SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-12494
CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 62-1545718
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification
or organization) Number)
2030 Hamilton Place Blvd., Suite 500, Chattanooga, TN 37421-6000
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (423) 855-0001
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past ninety (90) days.
YES |X| NO |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer |X| Accelerated filer |_| Non-accelerated filer |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
YES |_| NO |X|
As of May 4, 2006, there were 64,324,279 shares of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, outstanding.
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION...........................................................................................3
ITEM 1: Financial Statements..................................................................................3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.................................................................3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.......................................................4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.......................................................5
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements........................................6
ITEM 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................14
ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk...........................................25
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures..............................................................................25
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION.............................................................................................25
ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings....................................................................................25
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.........................................................................................25
ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds..........................................34
ITEM 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities......................................................................35
ITEM 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders..................................................35
ITEM 5: Other Information....................................................................................35
ITEM 6: Exhibits.............................................................................................35
SIGNATURE...............................................................................................................36
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Financial Statements
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
March 31, December 31,
2006 2005
--------------- ---------------
ASSETS
Real estate assets:
Land.............................................................. $ 766,431 $ 776,989
Buildings and improvements........................................ 5,680,097 5,698,669
--------------- ---------------
6,446,528 6,475,658
Less accumulated depreciation................................... (774,049) (727,907)
--------------- ---------------
5,672,479 5,747,751
Real estate assets held for sale, net............................. 98,073 63,168
Developments in progress.......................................... 170,137 133,509
--------------- ---------------
Net investment in real estate assets............................ 5,940,689 5,944,428
Cash and cash equivalents........................................... 41,490 28,838
Receivables:
Tenant, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,139 in
2006 and $3,439 in 2005........................................ 57,274 55,056
Other............................................................. 9,726 6,235
Mortgage and other notes receivable................................. 18,077 18,117
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates............................ 81,442 84,138
Other assets........................................................ 209,354 215,510
--------------- ---------------
$ 6,358,052 $ 6,352,322
=============== ===============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Mortgage and other notes payable.................................... $ 4,393,888 $ 4,341,055
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities............................ 284,190 320,270
--------------- ---------------
Total liabilities................................................. 4,678,078 4,661,325
--------------- ---------------
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 8) ......................
Minority interests.................................................. 586,436 609,475
--------------- ---------------
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized:
8.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
2,000,000 shares outstanding in 2006 and 2005............... 20 20
7.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
460,000 shares outstanding in 2006 and 2005................ 5 5
7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
700,000 shares outstanding in 2006 and 2005................ 7 7
Common stock, $.01 par value, 180,000,000 shares authorized,
64,243,646 and 62,512,816 shares issued and outstanding
in 2005 and 2004, respectively............................. 642 625
Additional paid - in capital...................................... 1,047,701 1,037,764
Deferred compensation............................................. - (8,895)
Other comprehensive income........................................ 1,095 288
Retained earnings................................................. 44,068 51,708
--------------- ---------------
Total shareholders' equity...................................... 1,093,538 1,081,522
--------------- ---------------
$ 6,358,052 $ 6,352,322
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
3
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
---------------------------------------
2006 2005
--------------- ---------------
REVENUES:
Minimum rents........................................................... $ 152,152 $ 130,295
Percentage rents........................................................ 6,353 8,090
Other rents............................................................. 3,880 3,125
Tenant reimbursements................................................... 75,991 65,526
Management, development and leasing fees................................ 1,077 3,046
Other................................................................... 5,866 4,629
--------------- ---------------
Total revenues........................................................ 245,319 214,711
--------------- ---------------
EXPENSES:
Property operating...................................................... 40,737 35,638
Depreciation and amortization........................................... 54,766 41,275
Real estate taxes....................................................... 19,265 15,421
Maintenance and repairs................................................. 12,693 12,319
General and administrative.............................................. 9,587 9,186
Loss on impairment of real estate assets................................ - 262
Other................................................................... 4,169 3,430
--------------- ---------------
Total expenses........................................................ 141,217 117,531
--------------- ---------------
Income from operations.................................................. 104,102 97,180
Interest income......................................................... 1,732 1,683
Interest expense........................................................ (63,929) (48,921)
Loss on extinguishment of debt.......................................... - (884)
Gain on sales of real estate assets..................................... 900 2,714
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates......................... 2,068 3,091
Minority interest in earnings:
Operating partnership................................................. (18,129) (20,826)
Shopping center properties............................................ (588) (1,397)
--------------- ---------------
Income before discontinued operations................................... 26,156 32,640
Operating income of discontinued operations............................. 2,099 405
Loss on discontinued operations......................................... - (32)
--------------- ---------------
Net income.............................................................. 28,255 33,013
Preferred dividends..................................................... (7,642) (7,642)
--------------- ---------------
Net income available to common shareholders............................. $ 20,613 $ 25,371
=============== ===============
Basic per share data:
Income before discontinued operations,
net of preferred dividends...................................... $ 0.30 $ 0.40
Discontinued operations............................................. 0.03 0.01
--------------- ---------------
Net income available to common shareholders......................... $ 0.33 $ 0.41
=============== ===============
Weighted average common shares outstanding.......................... 62,655 62,448
Diluted per share data:
Income before discontinued operations,
net of preferred dividends....................................... $ 0.29 $ 0.39
Discontinued operations............................................. 0.03 -
--------------- ---------------
Net income available to common shareholders......................... $ 0.32 $ 0.39
=============== ===============
Weighted average common and potential
dilutive common shares outstanding............................... 64,283 64,794
Dividends declared per common share..................................... $ 0.4575 $ 0.40625
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
---------------------------------------
2006 2005
--------------- ---------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income.............................................................. $ 28,255 $ 33,013
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation.......................................................... 39,026 28,261
Amortization ......................................................... 18,032 15,046
Amortization of debt premiums......................................... (1,842) (1,678)
Amortization of above and below market leases......................... (2,602) (1,531)
Gain on sales of real estate assets................................... (900) (2,714)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations........................... - 32
Abandoned development projects........................................ (5) 121
Stock-based compensation expense...................................... 2,195 1,131
Loss on extinguishment of debt........................................ - 884
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates....................... (2,068) -
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates.......................... 2,269 -
Loss on impairment of real estate assets.............................. - 262
Minority interest in earnings......................................... 18,717 22,223
Changes in:
Tenant and other receivables.......................................... (5,709) 4,997
Other assets.......................................................... (3,556) (846)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.............................. (23,830) (22,854)
--------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by operating activities..................... 67,982 76,347
--------------- ---------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to real estate assets..................................... (50,044) (43,349)
Changes in other assets............................................. 4,805 (1,989)
Proceeds from sales of real estate assets........................... 1,541 52,675
Payments received on mortgage notes receivable...................... 40 542
Additional investments in and advances to unconsolidated
affiliates........................................................ (2,964) (9,542)
Distributions in excess of equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates........................................................ 5,459 3,189
Purchase of minority interest in the Operating Partnership.......... (1,112) (6)
--------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities........... (42,275) 1,520
--------------- ---------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from mortgage and other notes payable...................... 72,328 45,334
Principal payments on mortgage and other notes payable.............. (13,453) (33,892)
Additions to deferred financing costs............................... (2,460) (693)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.............................. 155 151
Costs related to issuance of preferred stock........................ - (193)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options............................. 2,395 1,379
Prepayment fees on extinguishment of debt........................... - (852)
Distributions to minority interests................................. (30,057) (22,186)
Dividends paid to holders of preferred stock........................ (7,642) (8,287)
Dividends paid to common shareholders............................... (34,321) (25,459)
--------------- ---------------
Net cash used in financing activities......................... (13,055) (44,698)
--------------- ---------------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS................................. 12,652 33,169
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period.......................... 28,838 25,766
--------------- ---------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period................................ $ 41,490 $ 58,935
=============== ===============
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized.................... $ 59,298 $ 48,428
=============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. ("CBL"), a Delaware corporation, is a
self-managed, self-administered, fully integrated real estate investment trust
("REIT") that is engaged in the ownership, development, acquisition, leasing,
management and operation of regional shopping malls and community centers. CBL's
shopping center properties are located in 27 states, but primarily in the
southeastern and midwestern United States.
CBL conducts substantially all of its business through CBL & Associates
Limited Partnership (the "Operating Partnership"). At March 31, 2006, the
Operating Partnership owned controlling interests in seventy-two regional malls,
twenty-seven associated centers (each adjacent to a regional shopping mall),
seven community centers and one office building. The Operating Partnership
consolidates the financial statements of all entities in which it has a
controlling financial interest or where it is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. The Operating Partnership owned non-controlling
interests in seven regional malls and three associated centers. Because one or
more of the other partners have substantive participating rights, the Operating
Partnership does not control these partnerships and, accordingly, accounts for
these investments using the equity method. The Operating Partnership had two
mall expansions, one open-air shopping center, two open-air shopping center
expansions, two associated centers and three community centers under
construction at March 31, 2006. The Operating Partnership also holds options to
acquire certain development properties owned by third parties.
CBL is the 100% owner of two qualified REIT subsidiaries, CBL Holdings I,
Inc. and CBL Holdings II, Inc. At March 31, 2006, CBL Holdings I, Inc., the sole
general partner of the Operating Partnership, owned a 1.6% general partner
interest in the Operating Partnership and CBL Holdings II, Inc. owned a 53.9%
limited partner interest for a combined interest held by CBL of 55.5%.
The minority interest in the Operating Partnership is held primarily by CBL
& Associates, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively "CBL's Predecessor") and by
affiliates of The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. ("Jacobs"). CBL's Predecessor
contributed their interests in certain real estate properties and joint ventures
to the Operating Partnership in exchange for a limited partner interest when the
Operating Partnership was formed in November 1993. Jacobs contributed their
interests in certain real estate properties and joint ventures to the Operating
Partnership in exchange for limited partner interests when the Operating
Partnership acquired the majority of Jacobs' interests in 23 properties in
January 2001 and the balance of such interests in February 2002. At March 31,
2006, CBL's Predecessor owned a 15.1% limited partner interest, Jacobs owned a
20.5% limited partner interest and third parties owned an 8.9% limited partner
interest in the Operating Partnership. CBL's Predecessor also owned 5.9 million
shares of CBL's common stock at March 31, 2006, for a total combined effective
interest of 20.3% in the Operating Partnership.
The Operating Partnership conducts CBL's property management and
development activities through CBL & Associates Management, Inc. (the
"Management Company") to comply with certain requirements of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Operating Partnership owns
100% of the Management Company's preferred stock and common stock.
CBL, the Operating Partnership and the Management Company are collectively
referred to herein as "the Company".
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited;
however, they have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
6
information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring matters) necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial statements for these interim periods have been
included. The results for the interim period ended March 31, 2006, are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.'s audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the CBL & Associates
Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
Note 2 - Joint Ventures
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
At March 31, 2006, the Company had investments in the following 14
partnerships and joint ventures, which are accounted for using the equity method
of accounting:
---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -----------
Company's
Joint Venture Property Name Interest
---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -----------
Governor's Square IB Governor's Plaza 50.0%
Governor's Square Company Governor's Square 47.5%
High Pointe Commons, LP High Pointe Commons 50.0%
Imperial Valley Mall L.P. Imperial Valley Mall 60.0%
Imperial Valley Peripheral L.P. Imperial Valley Mall (vacant land) 60.0%
Imperial Valley Commons L.P. Imperial Valley Commons 60.0%
Kentucky Oaks Mall Company Kentucky Oaks Mall 50.0%
Mall of South Carolina L.P. Coastal Grand-Myrtle Beach 50.0%
Mall of South Outparcel L.P. Coastal Grand-Myrtle Beach (vacant 50.0%
land)
Mall Shopping Center Company Plaza del Sol 50.6%
N. Dalton Bypass, LLC Hammond Creek Commons 51.0%
Parkway Place L.P. Parkway Place 45.0%
Triangle Town Member LLC Triangle Town Center, Triangle Town 50.0%
Commons and Triangle Town Place
York Town Center, LP York Town Center 50.0%
Condensed combined financial statement information for the unconsolidated
affiliates is as follows:
Company's Share for the
Total for the Three Months Three Months
Ended March 31, Ended March 31,
------------------------------ -----------------------------
2006 2005 2006 2005
--------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Revenues $ 24,879 $ 35,826 $ 12,506 $ 8,767
Depreciation and amortization (6,476) (7,914) (3,278) (1,710)
Interest expense (8,665) (8,898) (4,394) (2,522)
Other operating expenses (6,879) (8,595) (3,469) (2,379)
Discontinued operations - 454 - 38
Gain on sales of real estate assets 1,406 1,471 703 897
--------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Net income $ 4,265 $ 12,344 $ 2,068 $ 3,091
=============== ============= ============== =============
Note 3 - Mortgage and Other Notes Payable
Mortgage and other notes payable consisted of the following at March
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively:
7
March 31, 2006 December 31, 2005
------------------------------ ----------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Interest Interest
Amount Rate(1) Amount Rate(1)
-------------- -------------- --------------- -----------
Fixed-rate debt:
Non-recourse loans on operating properties $ 3,262,444 6.02% $ 3,281,939 6.02%
-------------- ---------------
Variable-rate debt:
Recourse term loans on operating properties 292,000 5.67% 292,000 5.33%
Construction loans 100,294 5.95% 76,831 5.76%
Lines of credit 739,150 5.46% 690,285 5.29%
-------------- ---------------
Total variable-rate debt 1,131,444 5.56% 1,059,116 5.33%
-------------- ---------------
Total $ 4,393,888 5.90% $ 4,341,055 5.85%
============== ===============
(1) Weighted-average interest rate including the effect of debt premiums,
but excluding amortization of deferred financing costs.
Unsecured Line of Credit
------------------------
The Company has one unsecured credit facility with total availability of
$500,000. This credit facility bears interest at the London Interbank Offered
Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin of 90 to 145 basis points based on the Company's
leverage, as defined in the agreement. The credit facility matures in August
2006 and has three one-year extension options, which are at the Company's
election. At March 31, 2006, the outstanding borrowings of $350,000 under the
unsecured credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of 5.17%.
Secured Lines of Credit
------------------------
The Company has four secured lines of credit that are used for
construction, acquisition, and working capital purposes. Each of these lines is
secured by mortgages on certain of the Company's operating properties.
Borrowings under the secured lines of credit had a weighted average interest
rate of 5.72% at March 31, 2006. The following summarizes certain information
about the secured lines of credit as of March 31, 2006:
Total Total Maturity
Available Outstanding Date
----------------------------------------------------
$ 476,000 $ 358,150 February 2009
100,000 29,000 June 2007
20,000 1,000 March 2007
10,000 1,000 April 2007
-------------------------------------
$ 606,000 $ 389,150
=====================================
In February 2006, the Company amended one of the secured credit facilities
to increase the maximum availability from $373,000 to $476,000, extend the
maturity date from February 28, 2006 to February 28, 2009 plus a one-year
extension option, increase the minimum tangible net worth requirement, as
defined, from $1,000,000 to $1,370,000 and increase the limit on the maximum
availability that the Company may request from $500,000 to $650,000.
Letters of Credit
-----------------
At March 31, 2006, the Company had additional secured lines of credit with
a total commitment of $27,123 that can only be used for issuing letters of
credit. The total outstanding amount under these lines of credit was $25,880 at
March 31, 2006.
Covenants and Restrictions
--------------------------
Twenty-three malls, five associated centers, two community centers and the
corporate office building are owned by special purpose entities that are
8
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements. The sole business
purpose of the special purpose entities is to own and operate these properties,
each of which is encumbered by a commercial-mortgage-backed-securities loan. The
real estate and other assets owned by these special purpose entities are
restricted under the loan agreements in that they are not available to settle
other debts of the Company. However, so long as the loans are not under an event
of default, as defined in the loan agreements, the cash flows from these
properties, after payments of debt service, operating expenses and reserves, are
available for distribution to the Company.
The weighted average remaining term of the Company's consolidated debt was
4.7 years at March 31, 2006 and 4.7 years at December 31, 2005. Of the $751,197
of debt that will mature before March 31, 2007, the Company has extension
options that will extend the maturity date of $587,222 of that debt beyond March
31, 2007. The mortgage notes payable comprising the remaining $163,975 are
expected to be retired or refinanced.
Note 4 - Shareholders' Equity And Minority Interests
In January 2006, holders of 1,480,066 common units of limited partnership
interest in the Operating Partnership and holders of 27,582 Series J special
common units ("J-SCUs") of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership exercised their conversion rights. The Company elected to issue
1,480,066 shares of common stock in exchange for the common units and to pay
cash of $1,112 in exchange for the J-SCUs.
Note 5 - Segment Information
The Company measures performance and allocates resources according to
property type, which is determined based on certain criteria such as type of
tenants, capital requirements, economic risks, leasing terms, and short- and
long-term returns on capital. Rental income and tenant reimbursements from
tenant leases provide the majority of revenues from all segments. Information on
the Company's reportable segments is presented as follows:
Associated Community
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 Malls Centers Centers All Other Total
-------------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ------------
Revenues $ 227,828 $ 9,152 $ 1,904 $ 6,435 $ 245,319
Property operating expenses (1) (75,542) (2,224) (693) 5,764 (72,695)
Interest expense (54,310) (1,154) (700) (7,765) (63,929)
Other expense - - - (4,169) (4,169)
Gain on sales of real estate assets - - 53 847 900
----------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ------------
Segment profit and loss $ 97,976 $ 5,774 $ 564 $ 1,112 105,426
=========== ============== ============= ===============
Depreciation and amortization expense (54,766)
General and administrative expense (9,587)
Interest income 1,732
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates 2,068
Minority interest in earnings (18,717)
------------
Income before discontinued operations $ 26,156
============
Total assets $5,721,502 $ 273,772 $ 151,635 $ 211,143 $6,358,052
Capital expenditures (2) $ 32,920 $ 10,222 $ 315 $ 12,706 $ 56,163
9
Associated Community
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Malls Centers Centers All Other Total
-------------------------------------- ----------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ------------
Revenues $ 199,181 $ 8,246 $ 1,593 $ 5,691 $ 214,711
Property operating expenses (1) (66,915) (1,954) (361) 5,852 (63,378)
Interest expense (43,489) (1,174) (715) (3,543) (48,921)
Other expense - - - (3,430) (3,430)
Gain (loss) on sales of real estate
assets 990 - (1,724) 3,448 2,714
----------- ------------- ------------- --------------- ------------
Segment profit and loss $ 89,767 $ 5,118 $ (1,207) $ 8,018 101,696
=========== ============== ============= ===============
Depreciation and amortization expense (41,275)
General and administrative expense (9,186)
Loss on impairment of real estate
assets (262)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (884)
Interest income 1,683
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates 3,091
Minority interest in earnings (22,223)
------------
Income before discontinued operations $ 32,640
============
Total assets $4,654,115 $ 277,335 $ 89,574 $ 157,756 $5,178,780
Capital expenditures (2) $ 33,828 $ 5,962 $ 737 $ 14,709 $ 55,236
(1) Property operating expenses include property operating expenses, real
estate taxes and maintenance and repairs. (2) Amounts include acquisitions
of real estate assets and investments in unconsolidated affiliates.
Developments in progress are included in the All Other category.
Note 6- Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net income
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of unrestricted
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS assumes the issuance of
common stock for all potential dilutive common shares outstanding. The limited
partners' rights to convert their minority interest in the Operating Partnership
into shares of common stock are not dilutive. The following summarizes the
impact of potential dilutive common shares on the denominator used to compute
earnings per share:
Three Months Ended March 31,
----------------------------
2006 2005
------------- -----------
Weighted average shares outstanding 63,042 62,768
Effect of nonvested stock awards (387) (320)
------------- -----------
Denominator - basic earnings per share 62,655 62,448
Dilutive effect of:
Stock options 1,421 1,888
Nonvested stock awards 183 242
Deemed shares related to deferred compensation
arrangements 64 216
------------- -----------
Denominator - diluted earnings per share 64,283 64,794
============= ===========
Note 7- Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in shareholders' equity during
the period, except those resulting from investments by shareholders and
distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income includes other comprehensive
income of $807 in the three months ended March 31, 2006, which represents
unrealized gain on marketable securities that are classified as available for
sale. Comprehensive income was equal to net income for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
10
Note 8- Contingencies
The Company is currently involved in certain litigation that arises in the
ordinary course of business. It is management's opinion that the pending
litigation will not materially affect the financial position or results of
operations of the Company.
The Company has guaranteed 50% of the debt of Parkway Place L.P., an
unconsolidated affiliate in which the Company owns a 45% interest, which owns
Parkway Place in Huntsville, AL. The total amount outstanding at March 31, 2006,
was $53,200 of which the Company has guaranteed $26,600. The guaranty will
expire when the related debt matures in June 2008.
The Company has issued various bonds that it would have to satisfy in the
event of non-performance. At March 31, 2006, the total amount outstanding on
these bonds was $24,013.
Note 9 - Share-Based Compensation
The Company maintains the CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which permits the Company to issue
stock options and common stock to selected officers, employees and directors of
the Company up to a total of 10,400,000 shares. The compensation committee of
the board of directors (the "Committee") administers the plan. The compensation
cost that has been charged against income for the plan was $2,253 and $1,142 for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Compensation cost
resulting from share-based awards is recorded at the Management Company. The
Management Company is a taxable entity; however, as a result of it incurring
recurring losses, a full valuation allowance has been recorded against its net
deferred tax asset. Accordingly, the recognition of compensation cost or the tax
deduction received upon the exercise or vesting of share-based awards, resulted
in no tax benefits to the Company. Compensation cost capitalized as part of real
estate assets was $106 and $44 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
Stock options issued under the plan allow for the purchase of common stock
at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Stock options
granted to officers and employees vest and become exercisable in installments on
each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant and expire 10 years
after the date of grant. Stock options granted to independent directors are
fully vested upon grant; however, the independent directors may not sell, pledge
or otherwise transfer their stock options during their board term or for one
year thereafter. No stock options have been granted since 2002.
Under the plan, common stock may be awarded either alone, in addition to,
or in tandem with other stock awards granted under the plan. The Committee has
the authority to determine eligible persons to whom common stock will be
awarded, the number of shares to be awarded and the duration of the vesting
period, as defined. The Committee may also provide for the issuance of common
stock under the plan on a deferred basis pursuant to deferred compensation
arrangements. The fair value of common stock awarded under the plan is
determined based on the market price of the Company's common stock on the grant
date.
Historically, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plans
under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25") and
related interpretations. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company elected to begin
recording the expense associated with stock options granted after January 1,
2003, on a prospective basis in accordance with the fair value and transition
11
provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", as
amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition
and Disclosure - An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123."
No stock-based compensation expense related to stock options granted prior
to January 1, 2003, has been reflected in net income since these awards are
being accounted for under APB No. 25 and all options granted had an exercise
price equal to the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of
grant. For SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosure purposes, the fair value of stock
options was determined as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method,
compensation cost recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2006
includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to,
but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 and (b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated.
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company's
net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended March 31,
2006, is $94 lower than if it had continued to account for share-based
compensation under SFAS No. 123. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 would have been the same as reported basic and
diluted earnings per share if the Company had not adopted SFAS 123(R).
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per
share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No. 123(R) to all outstanding and unvested awards in the three months ended
March 31, 2005:
-----------------
Three Months
Ended March 31,
2005
------------------
Net income available to common shareholders, as reported $25,371
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in
reported net income available to common
shareholders 1,142
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value method (1,247)
------------------
Pro forma net income available to common shareholders $25,226
==================
Earnings per share:
Basic, as reported $ 0.41
==================
Basic, pro forma $ 0.41
==================
Diluted, as reported $ 0.39
==================
Diluted, pro forma $ 0.39
==================
The Company's stock option activity for the three months ended March 31,
2006 is summarized as follows:
Weighted
Weighted Average Aggregate
Average Remaining Intrinsic
Exercise Contractual Value
Shares Price Term
-------------- ---------------------------------------
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 2,208,440 $ 13.89
Exercised (212,020) $ 11.29
--------------
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 1,996,420 $ 14.16 4.1 years $ 56,474
==============
Vested or expected to vest at March 31, 2006 1,996,420 $ 14.16 4.1 years $ 56,474
==============
Options exercisable at March 31, 2006 1,569,420 $ 13.40 3.7 years $ 45,585
==============
12
No stock options have been granted since the adoption of SFAS No. 123 on
January 1, 2003. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, was $6,611 and $2,766, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company's nonvested shares as of March 31,
2006, and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2006, is presented
below:
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Shares Fair Value
-------------------------
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 387,506 $ 30.06
Granted 36,181 $ 41.42
Vested (37,658) $ 40.01
Forfeited (600) $ 39.24
-------------
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 385,429 $ 30.14
=============
The weighted average grant-date fair value of shares granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $41.42 and $35.81, respectively.
The total fair value of shares vested during the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005 was $1,560 and $896, respectively.
As of March 31, 2006, there was $8,605 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under
the plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 3.7 years.
Note 10 - Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
The Company's noncash investing and financing activities were as follows
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-------------------------
2006 2005
-------------------------
Conversion of minority interest into common stock $16,486 $ -
Additions to real estate assets accrued but not yet paid $17,670 $7,291
=========================
Note 11 - Discontinued Operations
As of March 31, 2006, the Company had identified five community centers
that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale. Total revenues for
these community centers were $3,565 and $587 for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All prior periods presented have been restated
to reflect the operations of these community centers as discontinued operations.
The five community centers were sold during May 2006.
Note 12 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2005, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No.
04-5, "Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a
Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited
Partners Have Certain Rights." EITF Issue No. 04-5 provides a framework for
determining whether a general partner controls, and should consolidate, a
limited partnership or a similar entity. EITF Issue No. 04-5 is effective after
June 29, 2005, for all newly formed limited partnerships and for any
pre-existing limited partnerships that modify their partnership agreements after
that date. General partners of all other limited partnerships are required to
apply the consensus no later than the beginning of the first reporting period in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of EITF Issue No.
04-5 did not result in any changes to the manner in which the Company accounts
for its joint ventures.
13
In June 2005, the FASB issued FSP 78-9-1, "Interaction of AICPA Statement
of Position 78-9 and EITF Issue No. 04-5." The EITF acknowledged that the
consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-5 conflicts with certain aspects of Statement of
Position ("SOP") 78-9, "Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures." The
EITF agreed that the assessment of whether a general partner, or the general
partners as a group, controls a limited partnership should be consistent for all
limited partnerships, irrespective of the industry within which the limited
partnership operates. Accordingly, the guidance in SOP 78-9 was amended in FSP
78-9-1 to be consistent with the guidance in EITF Issue No. 04-5. The effective
dates for this FSP are the same as those mentioned above in EITF Issue No. 04-5.
The adoption of FSP 78-9-1 did not result in any changes to the manner in which
the Company accounts for its joint ventures.
ITEM 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes that are included in this Form 10-Q. In this
discussion, the terms "we", "us", "our", and the "Company" refer to CBL &
Associates Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Certain statements made in this section or elsewhere in this report may be
deemed "forward looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities
laws. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that
these expectations will be attained, and it is possible that actual results may
differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due
to a variety of risks and uncertainties. In addition to the risk factors
described in Part II, Item 1A. of this report, such risks and uncertainties
include, without limitation, general industry, economic and business conditions,
interest rate fluctuations, costs of capital and capital requirements,
availability of real estate properties, inability to consummate acquisition
opportunities, competition from other companies and retail formats, changes in
retail rental rates in the Company's markets, shifts in customer demands, tenant
bankruptcies or store closings, changes in vacancy rates at our properties,
changes in operating expenses, changes in applicable laws, rules and
regulations, the ability to obtain suitable equity and/or debt financing and the
continued availability of financing in the amounts and on the terms necessary to
support our future business. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors
affecting the forward-looking information.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We are a self-managed, self-administered, fully integrated real estate
investment trust ("REIT") that is engaged in the ownership, development,
acquisition, leasing, management and operation of regional shopping malls and
community centers. Our shopping center properties are located in 27 states, but
primarily in the southeastern and midwestern United States.
As of March 31, 2006, we owned controlling interests in seventy-two
regional malls, twenty-seven associated centers (each adjacent to a regional
shopping mall), seven community centers and one office building. We consolidate
the financial statements of all entities in which we have a controlling
financial interest or where we are the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. As of March 31, 2006, we owned non-controlling interests in
seven regional malls and three associated centers. Because one or more of the
other partners have substantive participating rights we do not control these
partnerships and joint ventures and, accordingly, account for these investments
using the equity method. We had two mall expansions, one open-air shopping
center, two open-air shopping center expansions, two associated centers and
three community centers under construction at March 31, 2006. We also hold
options to acquire certain development properties owned by third parties.
14
The majority of our revenues is derived from leases with retail tenants and
generally includes base minimum rents, percentage rents based on tenants' sales
volumes and reimbursements from tenants for expenditures, including property
operating expenses, real estate taxes and maintenance and repairs, as well as
certain capital expenditures. We also generate revenues from sales of outparcel
land at the properties and from sales of operating real estate assets when it is
determined that we can realize the maximum value of the assets. Proceeds from
such sales are generally used to reduce borrowings on our credit facilities.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following significant transactions impact the comparison of the results
of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to the results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005:
|X| We have acquired or opened eight malls, two open-air centers, two
associated centers and two community centers since January 1, 2005
(collectively referred to as the "New Properties"). We do not consider
a property to be one of the Comparable Properties (defined below)
until the property has been open for one complete calendar year. The
New Properties are as follows:
Project Name Location Date Acquired / Opened
------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- -----------------------
Acquisitions:
Laurel Park Place Livonia, MI June 2005
The Mall of Acadiana Lafayette, LA July 2005
Layton Hills Mall Layton, UT November 2005
Layton Hills Convenience Center Layton, UT November 2005
Oak Park Mall Overland Park, KS November 2005
Eastland Mall Bloomington, IL November 2005
Hickory Point Mall Forsyth, IL November 2005
Triangle Town Center (50/50 joint venture) Raleigh, NC November 2005
Triangle Town Place (50/50 joint venture) Raleigh, NC November 2005
Developments:
Imperial Valley Mall (60/40 joint venture) El Centro, CA March 2005
Cobblestone Village at Royal Palm Royal Palm Beach, FL June 2005
Chicopee Marketplace Chicopee, MA September 2005
Southaven Towne Center Southaven, MS October 2005
Gulf Coast Town Center - Phase I (50/50
joint venture) Ft. Myers, FL November 2005
|X| Properties that were in operation as of January 1, 2005 and March 31,
2006 are referred to as the "Comparable Properties."
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 to the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005
Revenues
The $30.6 million increase in revenues resulted from increases of $25.4
million attributable to the additional revenues from the New Properties and
increased revenues of $6.0 million from the Comparable Properties.
Our cost recovery ratio increased slightly to 104.5% for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, compared to 103.4% for the three months ended March 31,
2005.
Management, development and leasing fees decreased $2.0 million, primarily
as a result of the sale of our management contracts with Galileo America, LLC in
August 2005.
15
Other revenues increased $1.2 million due to growth in our subsidiary that
provides security and maintenance services to third parties.
Expenses
The $9.3 million increase in property operating expenses, including real
estate taxes and maintenance and repairs, resulted from an increase of $7.5
million attributable to the New Properties and $1.8 million from the Comparable
Properties.
The $13.5 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense
resulted from increases of $10.7 million from the New Properties and $2.8
million from the Comparable Properties. The increase attributable to the
Comparable Properties is due to ongoing capital expenditures for renovations,
expansions, tenant allowances and deferred maintenance.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million primarily as a
result of annual increases in salaries and benefits of existing personnel and
the addition of new personnel to support our growth.
Other expense increased $0.7 million due to an increase of $0.8 million in
the operating expenses of our subsidiary that provides security and maintenance
services to third parties and a decrease of $0.1 million in write-offs of
abandoned development projects.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest expense increased by $15.0 million due to the additional debt
associated with the New Properties and an increase in the weighted average
interest rate of our variable-rate debt as compared to the comparable period of
the prior year.
Gain on Sales
Gain on sales of real estate assets of $0.9 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2006 relates to the sale of one outparcel. Gain on sales of real
estate assets of $2.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005 was
primarily related to a gain of $1.7 million from sales of two outparcels and
$1.0 million from the recognition of deferred gain related to properties that
were previously sold to Galileo America, LLC.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates decreased $1.0 million
primarily because of the disposition of our ownership interest in Galileo
America, LLC in August 2005.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations in the three months ended March 31, 2006 reflects
the results of operations of five community centers that were classified as held
for sale as of March 31, 2006. Discontinued operations in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 are related to five community centers that were sold in March
2005, as well as six community centers that have been sold or classified as held
for sale in periods subsequent to March 31, 2005.
Operational Review
The shopping center business is, to some extent, seasonal in nature with
tenants achieving the highest levels of sales during the fourth quarter because
16
of the holiday season. Additionally, the malls earn most of their "temporary"
rents (rents from short-term tenants), during the holiday period. Thus,
occupancy levels and revenue production are generally the highest in the fourth
quarter of each year. Results of operations realized in any one quarter may not
be indicative of the results likely to be experienced over the course of the
fiscal year.
We classify our regional malls into two categories - malls that have
completed their initial lease-up are referred to as stabilized malls and malls
that are in their initial lease-up phase and have not been open for three
calendar years are referred to as non-stabilized malls. The non-stabilized malls
currently include Coastal Grand-Myrtle Beach in Myrtle Beach, SC, which opened
in March 2004; Imperial Valley Mall in El Centro, CA, which opened in March
2005; Southaven Towne Center in Southaven, MS, which opened in October 2005; and
Gulf Coast Town Center - Phase I in Ft. Myers, FL, which opened in November
2005.
We derive a significant amount of our revenues from the mall
properties. The sources of our revenues by property type were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31,
---------------------------------
2006 2005
----------------- ---------------
Malls 92.9% 92.8%
Associated centers 3.7% 3.8%
Community centers 0.8% 0.7%
Mortgages, office building and other 2.6% 2.7%
Sales and Occupancy Costs
Mall store sales (for those tenants who occupy 10,000 square feet or less
and have reported sales) increased by 2.8% on a comparable per square foot basis
to $332 per square foot for the trailing twelve months ended March 31, 2006.
Occupancy costs as a percentage of sales for the stabilized malls were
13.6% (we previously reported 12.6% in the investor conference call script
attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 28, 2006)
and 13.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Occupancy
The occupancy of the portfolio was as follows:
At March 31,
-------------------------------------
2006 2005
------------------ ------------------
Total portfolio occupancy 91.3% 91.3%
Total mall portfolio 91.1% 91.5%
Stabilized malls 91.3% 91.9%
Non-stabilized malls 88.2% 81.8%
Associated centers 92.0% 91.9%
Community centers 91.9% 82.9%
Leasing
Average annual base rents per square foot were as follows for each property
type:
At March 31,
-------------------------------------
2006 2005
------------------ ------------------
Stabilized malls $ 26.71 $ 25.45
Non-stabilized malls $ 27.11 $ 26.92
Associated centers $ 10.85 $ 10.05
Community centers $ 9.44 $ 14.55
Other $ 19.33 $ 19.25
17
The following table shows the positive results we achieved in increasing
the initial and average base rents through new and renewal leasing during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 for small shop spaces less than 20,000 square
feet that were previously occupied, excluding junior anchors:
Base Rent
Per Initial Base Average Base
Square Foot Rent Per Rent Per
Prior Lease Square Foot % Change Square Foot % Change
Square Feet (1) New Lease (2) Initial New Lease (3) Average
------------- ------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
Stabilized Malls 753,970 $ 26.24 $ 26.37 0.5% $ 27.01 2.9%
Associated centers 14,657 17.57 18.86 7.3% 18.87 7.4%
Community centers 5,002 20.62 20.62 0.0% 21.47 4.1%
------------- ------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
773,629 $ 26.04 $ 26.19 0.6% $ 26.82 3.0%
============= ============= =============== ============ ============= ===========
(1) Represents the rent that was in place at the end of the lease term.
(2) Represents the rent in place at beginning of the lease terms.
(3) Average base rent over the term of the new lease.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
There was $41.5 million of cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2006,
an increase of $12.7 million from December 31, 2005. Cash flows from operations
are used to fund short-term liquidity and capital needs such as tenant
construction allowances, capital expenditures and payments of dividends and
distributions. For longer-term liquidity needs such as acquisitions, new
developments, renovations and expansions, we typically rely on property specific
mortgages (which are generally non-recourse), construction and term loans,
revolving lines of credit, common stock, preferred stock, joint venture
investments and a minority interest in the Operating Partnership.
Cash Flows
Cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March
31, 2006, decreased by $8.3 million to $68.0 million from $76.3 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Debt
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we borrowed $72.3 million
under mortgage and other notes payable and paid $13.5 million to reduce
outstanding borrowings under mortgage and other notes payable. We also paid $2.5
million of costs directly related to borrowings and our credit facilities.
The following tables summarize debt based on our pro rata ownership share
(including our pro rata share of unconsolidated affiliates and excluding
minority investors' share of shopping center properties) because we believe this
provides investors a clearer understanding of our total debt obligations and
liquidity (in thousands):
Weighted
Average
Minority Unconsolidated Interest
Consolidated Interests Affiliates Total Rate(1)
------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- ---------------
March 31, 2006:
Fixed-rate debt:
Non-recourse loans on operating properties $ 3,262,444 $ (51,686) $ 225,238 $ 3,435,996 5.99%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Variable-rate debt:
Recourse term loans on operating properties 292,000 - 26,600 318,600 5.64%
Construction loans 100,294 - - 100,294 5.95%
Lines of credit 739,150 - - 739,150 5.46%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Total variable-rate debt 1,131,444 - 26,600 1,158,044 5.55%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Total $ 4,393,888 $ (51,686) $ 251,838 $ 4,594,040 5.88%
============= ================ =============== =============
18
Weighted
Average
Minority Unconsolidated Interest
Consolidated Interests Affiliates Total Rate(1)
------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------- ---------------
December 31, 2005:
Fixed-rate debt:
Non-recourse loans on operating properties $ 3,281,939 $ (51,950) $ 216,026 $ 3,446,015 5.99%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Variable-rate debt:
Recourse term loans on operating properties 292,000 - 26,600 318,600 5.33%
Construction loans 76,831 - - 76,831 5.76%
Lines of credit 690,285 - - 690,285 5.29%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Total variable-rate debt 1,059,116 - 26,600 1,085,716 5.33%
------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------
Total $ 4,341,055 $ (51,950) $ 242,626 $ 4,531,731 5.83%
============= ================ =============== =============
(1) Weighted average interest rate including the effect of debt premiums,
but excluding amortization of deferred financing costs.
We have four secured credit facilities with total availability of $606.0
million, of which $389.2 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2006. The
secured credit facilities bear interest at rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging
from 90 to 100 basis points.
We have an unsecured credit facility with total availability of $500.0
million, of which $350.0 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2006. The
unsecured credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 90 to 145
basis points based on our leverage.
We also have secured and unsecured lines of credit with total availability
of $27.1 million that can only be used to issue letters of credit. There was
$25.9 million outstanding under these lines at March 31, 2006.
The secured and unsecured credit facilities contain, among other
restrictions, certain financial covenants including the maintenance of certain
coverage ratios, minimum net worth requirements, and limitations on cash flow
distributions. We were in compliance with all financial covenants and
restrictions under our credit facilities at March 31, 2006. Additionally,
certain property-specific mortgage notes payable require the maintenance of debt
service coverage ratios. At March 31, 2006, the properties subject to these
mortgage notes payable were in compliance with the applicable ratios.
We expect to refinance the majority of mortgage and other notes payable
maturing over the next five years with replacement loans. Based on our pro rata
share of total debt, there is $745.1 million of debt that is scheduled to mature
before March 31, 2007. There are extension options in place that will extend the
maturity of $587.2 million of this debt beyond March 31, 2007. The remaining
$157.9 of debt that is maturing before March 31, 2007 is expected to be retired
or refinanced.
Equity
In January 2006, holders of 1,480,066 common units of limited partnership
interest in the Operating Partnership and holders of 27,582 Series J special
common units ("J-SCUs") of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership exercised their conversion rights. We elected to issue 1,480,066
shares of common stock in exchange for the common units and to pay cash of $1.1
million in exchange for the J-SCUs.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we received $2.6 million in
proceeds from issuances of common stock related to exercises of employee stock
options and from our dividend reinvestment plan.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we paid dividends of $42.0
million to holders of our common stock and our preferred stock, as well as $30.1
million in distributions to the minority interest investors in our Operating
Partnership and certain shopping center properties.
19
As a publicly traded company, we have access to capital through both the
public equity and debt markets. In January 2006, we filed a shelf registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission authorizing us to publicly
issue shares of preferred stock, common stock and warrants to purchase shares of
common stock. There is no limit to the offering price or number of shares that
we may issue under this shelf registration statement.
We anticipate that the combination of equity and debt sources will, for the
foreseeable future, provide adequate liquidity to continue our capital programs
substantially as in the past and make distributions to our shareholders in
accordance with the requirements applicable to real estate investment trusts.
Our strategy is to maintain a conservative debt-to-total-market
capitalization ratio in order to enhance our access to the broadest range of
capital markets, both public and private. Based on our share of total
consolidated and unconsolidated debt and the market value of equity, our
debt-to-total-market capitalization (debt plus market value equity) ratio was as
follows at March 31, 2006 (in thousands, except stock prices):
Shares
Outstanding Stock Price (1) Value
------------------ ----------------- -----------------
Common stock and operating partnership units 115,669 $ 42.45 $4,910,149
8.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 2,000 $ 50.00 100,000
7.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 460 $ 250.00 115,000
7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock 700 $ 250.00 175,000
-----------------
Total market equity 5,300,149
Company's share of total debt 4,593,990
-----------------
Total market capitalization $9,894,139
=================
Debt-to-total-market capitalization ratio 46.4%
=================
(1) Stock price for common stock and operating partnership units equals
the closing price of the common stock on March 31, 2006. The stock
price for the preferred stock represents the liquidation preference of
each respective series of preferred stock.
As of March 31, 2006, our variable rate debt of $1.2 billion represents
11.7% of our total market capitalization and 25.2% of our share of total
consolidated and unconsolidated debt.
Capital Expenditures
We expect to continue to have access to the capital resources necessary to
expand and develop our business. Future development and acquisition activities
will be undertaken as suitable opportunities arise. We do not expect to pursue
these opportunities unless adequate sources of funding are available and a
satisfactory budget with targeted returns on investment has been internally
approved.
An annual capital expenditures budget is prepared for each property that is
intended to provide for all necessary recurring and non-recurring capital
expenditures. We believe that property operating cash flows, which include
reimbursements from tenants for certain expenses, will provide the necessary
funding for these expenditures.
The following development projects were under construction as of March 31,
2006 (dollars in thousands):
20
Our Share
of Costs
Incurred
Project Our Share as of
Square Of Total March 31, Projected Initial
Property Location Feet Costs 2006 Opening Date Yield
--------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ --------------- --------
Mall Expansions:
The District at Valley View Roanoke, VA 75,576 $19,700 $ 922 Nov-06/Mar-07 7.3%
Hanes Mall-Dick's Sporting Goods Winston-Salem, NC 66,000 10,150 5,811 July-06 10.0%
Open-Air Center:
Alamance Crossing Burlington, NC 635,240 103,684 28,245 Jul-07 8.5%
Open-Air Center Expansions:
Southaven Towne Center-
Books-A-Million Southaven, MS 15,000 2,530 2,184 Aug-06 10.6%
Gulf Coast Town Center Phase II Ft. Myers, FL 750,000 109,641(a) 23,201 Oct-06/Mar-07 9.0%
Associated Centers:
The Plaza at Fayette Mall Lexington, KY 187,413 38,341 20,898 Jul/Oct-06 9.0%
Fairview
The Shoppes at St. Clair Heights, IL 77,330 27,048 13,032 Mar-07 7.0%
Community Center:
The Shoppes at Pineda Ridge Melbourne, FL 170,009 6,584 1,171 Nov-06 9.0%
High Pointe Commons Harrisburg, PA 299,935 7,271 5,963 Oct-06 10.0%
Lakeview Point Stillwater, OK 207,300 21,537 9,281 Oct-06 9.0%
----------- ------------ ------------
2,483,803 $346,486 $110,708
=========== ============ ============
(a) Amounts shown are 100% of the cost and cost to date.
There are construction loans in place for the costs of Alamance Crossing,
Gulf Coast Town Center, The Plaza at Fayette, High Pointe Commons and Lakeview
Pointe. The remaining costs will be funded with operating cash flows and the
credit facilities.
We have entered into a number of option agreements for the development of
future regional malls, open-air centers and community centers. Except for the
projects discussed under Developments and Expansions above, we do not have any
other material capital commitments.
Dispositions
We received a total of $1.6 million in cash proceeds from the sale of one
outparcel.
In May 2006, we sold five community centers for a total sales price of
$106.5 million. The assets and liabilities related to these community centers
were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2006.
Other Capital Expenditures
Including our share of unconsolidated affiliates' capital expenditures and
excluding minority investor's share of capital expenditures, we spent $5.0
million during the three months ended March 31, 2006 for tenant allowances,
which generate increased rents from tenants over the terms of their leases.
Deferred maintenance expenditures were $0.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and included $0.2 million for roof repairs and replacements, $0.1
million for resurfacing and improved lighting of parking lots and $0.1 million
for other capital expenditures. Renovation expenditures were $5.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Deferred maintenance expenditures are generally billed to tenants as common
area maintenance expense, and most are recovered over a 5- to 15-year period.
21
Renovation expenditures are primarily for remodeling and upgrades of malls, of
which approximately 30% is recovered from tenants over a 5- to 15-year period.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. The following discussion
describes our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are both
important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of
operations and that require significant judgment or use of complex estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Minimum rental revenue from operating leases is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the initial terms, including rent holidays, of the
related leases. Certain tenants are required to pay percentage rent if their
sales volumes exceed thresholds specified in their lease agreements. Percentage
rent is recognized as revenue when the thresholds are achieved and the amounts
become determinable.
We receive reimbursements from tenants for real estate taxes, insurance,
common area maintenance, utilities and other recoverable operating expenses as
provided in the lease agreements. Tenant reimbursements are recognized as
revenue in the period the related operating expenses are incurred. Tenant
reimbursements related to certain capital expenditures are billed to tenants
over periods of 5 to 15 years and are recognized as revenue when billed.
We receive management, leasing and development fees from third parties and
unconsolidated affiliates. Management fees are charged as a percentage of
revenues (as defined in the management agreement) and are recognized as revenue
when earned. Development fees are recognized as revenue on a pro rata basis over
the development period. Leasing fees are charged for newly executed leases and
lease renewals and are recognized as revenue when earned. Development and
leasing fees received from unconsolidated affiliates during the development
period are recognized as revenue to the extent of the third-party partners'
ownership interest. Fees to the extent of our ownership interest are recorded as
a reduction to our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate.
Gains on sales of real estate assets are recognized when it is determined
that the sale has been consummated, the buyer's initial and continuing
investment is adequate, our receivable, if any, is not subject to future
subordination, and the buyer has assumed the usual risks and rewards of
ownership of the asset. When we have an ownership interest in the buyer, gain is
recognized to the extent of the third party partner's ownership interest and the
portion of the gain attributable to our ownership interest is deferred.
Real Estate Assets
We capitalize predevelopment project costs paid to third parties. All
previously capitalized predevelopment costs are expensed when it is no longer
probable that the project will be completed. Once development of a project
commences, all direct costs incurred to construct the project, including
interest and real estate taxes, are capitalized. Additionally, certain general
and administrative expenses are allocated to the projects and capitalized based
on the amount of time applicable personnel work on the development project.
Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Major replacements
and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful
lives.
All acquired real estate assets are accounted for using the purchase method
of accounting and accordingly, the results of operations are included in the
consolidated statements of operations from the respective dates of acquisition.
The purchase price is allocated to (i) tangible assets, consisting of land,
22
buildings and improvements, and tenant improvements, (ii) and identifiable
intangible assets and liabilities generally consisting of above- and
below-market leases and in-place leases. We use estimates of fair value based on
estimated cash flows, using appropriate discount rates, and other valuation
methods to allocate the purchase price to the acquired tangible and intangible
assets. Liabilities assumed generally consist of mortgage debt on the real
estate assets acquired. Assumed debt with a stated interest rate that is
significantly different from market interest rates is recorded at its fair value
based on estimated market interest rates at the date of acquisition.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over estimated lives of
40 years for buildings, 10 to 20 years for certain improvements and 7 to 10
years for equipment and fixtures. Tenant improvements are capitalized and
depreciated on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.
Lease-related intangibles from acquisitions of real estate assets are amortized
over the remaining terms of the related leases. Any difference between the face
value of the debt assumed and its fair value is amortized to interest expense
over the remaining term of the debt using the effective interest method.
Carrying Value of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically evaluate long-lived assets to determine if there has been
any impairment in their carrying values and record impairment losses if the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the assets' carrying amounts or if there are other indicators of impairment. If
it is determined that an impairment has occurred, the excess of the asset's
carrying value over its estimated fair value will be charged to operations.
There were no impairment charges in the three months ended March 31, 2006. We
recorded an impairment charge of $0.3 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2005, related to the sale of five community centers.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2005, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No.
04-5, "Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a
Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited
Partners Have Certain Rights." EITF Issue No. 04-5 provides a framework for
determining whether a general partner controls, and should consolidate, a
limited partnership or a similar entity. EITF Issue No. 04-5 is effective after
June 29, 2005, for all newly formed limited partnerships and for any
pre-existing limited partnerships that modify their partnership agreements after
that date. General partners of all other limited partnerships are required to
apply the consensus no later than the beginning of the first reporting period in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of EITF Issue No.
04-5 did not result in any changes to the manner in which we account for our
joint ventures.
In June 2005, the FASB issued FSP 78-9-1, "Interaction of AICPA Statement
of Position 78-9 and EITF Issue No. 04-5." The EITF acknowledged that the
consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-5 conflicts with certain aspects of Statement of
Position ("SOP") 78-9, "Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures." The
EITF agreed that the assessment of whether a general partner, or the general
partners as a group, controls a limited partnership should be consistent for all
limited partnerships, irrespective of the industry within which the limited
partnership operates. Accordingly, the guidance in SOP 78-9 was amended in FSP
78-9-1 to be consistent with the guidance in EITF Issue No. 04-5. The effective
dates for this FSP are the same as those mentioned above in EITF Issue No. 04-5.
The adoption of FSP 78-9-1 did not result in any changes to the manner in which
we account for our joint ventures.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
In the last three years, inflation has not had a significant impact on the
Company because of the relatively low inflation rate. Substantially all tenant
leases do, however, contain provisions designed to protect the Company from the
impact of inflation. These provisions include clauses enabling the Company to
23
receive percentage rent based on tenant's gross sales, which generally increase
as prices rise, and/or escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates
during the terms of the leases. In addition, many of the leases are for terms of
less than ten years, which may enable the Company to replace existing leases
with new leases at higher base and/or percentage rents if rents of the existing
leases are below the then existing market rate. Most of the leases require
tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area
maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing the Company's
exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
Funds From Operations ("FFO") is a widely used measure of the operating
performance of real estate companies that supplements net income determined in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). The National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") defines FFO as net
income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains or losses on sales of
operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments
for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated on the same basis.
We define FFO available for distribution as defined above by NAREIT less
dividends on preferred stock. Our method of calculating FFO may be different
from methods used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such
other REITs.
We believe that FFO provides an additional indicator of the operating
performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation
and amortization, which assumes the value of real estate assets declines
predictably over time. Since values of well-maintained real estate assets have
historically risen with market conditions, we believe that FFO enhances
investors' understanding of our operating performance. The use of FFO as an
indicator of financial performance is influenced not only by the operations of
our properties and interest rates, but also by our capital structure.
FFO does not represent cash flows from operations as defined by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, is not necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs and should not be
considered as an alternative to net income for purposes of evaluating our
operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.
FFO increased 9.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $96.6
million compared to $88.5 million for the same period in 2005. The New
Properties generated 83.5% of the growth in FFO. Consistently high portfolio
occupancy, recoveries of operating expenses, increases in rental rates from
renewal and replacement leasing and lower expenses related to bad debt and other
charges against revenues accounted for the remaining 16.5% growth in FFO.
The calculation of FFO is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
----------------------------
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Net income available to common shareholders $ 20,613 $ 25,371
Depreciation and amortization from:
Consolidated properties 54,766 41,275
Unconsolidated affiliates 3,278 1,710
Discontinued operations 515 11
Minority interest in earnings of operating partnership 18,129 20,826
Minority investors' share of depreciation and amortization
in shopping center properties (539) (362)
(Gain) loss on disposal of:
Operating real estate assets - (223)
Discontinued operations - 32
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets (195) (179)
------------- -------------
Funds from operations $ 96,567 $ 88,461
============= =============
24
ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our debt obligations and derivative
financial instruments. We may elect to use derivative financial instruments to
manage our exposure to changes in interest rates, but will not use them for
speculative purposes. Our interest rate risk management policy requires that
derivative instruments be used for hedging purposes only and that they be
entered into only with major financial institutions based on their credit
ratings and other factors.
Based on our proportionate share of consolidated and unconsolidated
variable rate debt at March 31, 2006, a 0.5% increase or decrease in interest
rates on this variable-rate debt would decrease or increase annual cash flows by
approximately $5.8 million and, after the effect of capitalized interest, annual
earnings by approximately $5.5 million.
Based on our proportionate share of total consolidated and unconsolidated
debt at March 31, 2006, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would decrease the
fair value of debt by approximately $72.6 million, while a 0.5% decrease in
interest rates would increase the fair value of debt by approximately $74.9
million.
We did not have any derivative financial instruments during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 or at March 31, 2005.
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of its effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, an
evaluation, under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was
performed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and with the participation of our management, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective. No change in our internal
control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings
None
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The following information updates the information disclosed in "Item 1A -
Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, by providing information that is current as of March 31, 2006:
25
RISKS RELATED TO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
----------------------------------------
REAL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS RISKS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND
OUR CONTROL, THAT COULD CAUSE DECLINES IN THE OPERATING REVENUES AND/OR THE
UNDERLYING VALUE OF ONE OR MORE OF OUR PROPERTIES.
A number of factors may decrease the income generated by a retail shopping
center property, including:
|X| National, regional and local economic climates, which may be
negatively impacted by plant closings, industry slowdowns, adverse
weather conditions, natural disasters, and other factors which tend to
reduce consumer spending on retail goods.
|X| Local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or reduction
in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the availability and
creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants.
|X| Increased operating costs, such as increases in real property taxes,
utility rates and insurance premiums.
|X| Perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and
attractiveness of the shopping center.
|X| The willingness and ability of the shopping center's owner to provide
capable management and maintenance services.
|X| The convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other
retailing options, such as the Internet.
In addition, other factors may adversely affect the value of our Properties
without affecting their current revenues, including:
|X| Adverse changes in governmental regulations, such as local zoning and
land use laws, environmental regulations or local tax structures that
could inhibit our ability to proceed with development, expansion, or
renovation activities that otherwise would be beneficial to our
Properties.
|X| Potential environmental or other legal liabilities that reduce the
amount of funds available to us for investment in our Properties.
|X| Any inability to obtain sufficient financing (including both
construction financing and permanent debt), or the inability to obtain
such financing on commercially favorable terms, to fund new
developments, acquisitions, and property expansions and renovations
which otherwise would benefit our Properties.
|X| An environment of rising interest rates, which could negatively impact
both the value of commercial real estate such as retail shopping
centers and the overall retail climate.
THE LOSS OF ONE OR MORE SIGNIFICANT TENANTS, DUE TO BANKRUPTCIES OR AS A RESULT
OF ONGOING CONSOLIDATIONS IN THE RETAIL INDUSTRY, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT BOTH
THE OPERATING REVENUES AND VALUE OF OUR PROPERTIES.
Regional malls are typically anchored by well-known department stores and
other significant tenants who generate shopping traffic at the mall. A decision
by an anchor tenant or other significant tenant to cease operations at one or
more Properties could have a material adverse effect on those Properties and, by
extension, on our financial condition and results of operations. The closing of
an anchor or other significant tenant may allow other anchors and/or tenants at
26
an affected Property to terminate their leases, to seek rent relief and/or cease
operating their stores or otherwise adversely affect occupancy at the Property.
In addition, key tenants at one or more Properties might terminate their leases
as a result of mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, dispositions or
bankruptcies in the retail industry. The bankruptcy and/or closure of one or
more significant tenants, if we are not able to successfully re-tenant the
affected space, could have a material adverse effect on both the operating
revenues and underlying value of the Properties involved.
WE MAY INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS,
WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH
FLOW AND THE FUNDS AVAILABLE TO US TO PAY DIVIDENDS.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and
regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances
on, under or in that real property. These laws often impose liability whether or
not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of
hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, removal or
remediation of hazardous or toxic substances may be substantial. In addition,
the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remedy
environmental hazards properly, may adversely affect the owner's or operator's
ability to sell or rent affected real property or to borrow money using affected
real property as collateral.
Persons or entities that arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous
or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation
of hazardous or toxic substances at the disposal or treatment facility, whether
or not that facility is owned or operated by the person or entity arranging for
the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. Laws exist that
impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and
third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real property for
personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing materials. In
connection with our ownership, operation, management, development and
redevelopment of our Properties, or any other Properties we acquire in the
future, we may be potentially liable under these laws and may incur costs in
responding to these liabilities, which could have an adverse effect on our
results of operations, cash flow and the funds available to us to pay dividends.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND THE MARKET FOR OUR STOCK
-----------------------------------------------------------
WE MAY ELECT NOT TO PROCEED WITH CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONCE THEY HAVE
BEEN UNDERTAKEN, RESULTING IN CHARGES THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT
ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD IN WHICH THE CHARGE IS TAKEN.
We intend to pursue development and expansion activities as opportunities
arise. In connection with any development or expansion, we will incur various
risks including the risk that development or expansion opportunities explored by
us may be abandoned and the risk that construction costs of a project may exceed
original estimates, possibly making the project not profitable. Other risks
include the risk that we may not be able to refinance construction loans which
are generally with full recourse to us, the risk that occupancy rates and rents
at a completed project will not meet projections and will be insufficient to
make the project profitable, and the risk that we will not be able to obtain
anchor, mortgage lender and property partner approvals for certain expansion
activities. In the event of an unsuccessful development project, our loss could
exceed our investment in the project.
We have in the past elected not to proceed with certain development
projects and anticipate that we will do so again from time to time in the
future. If we elect not to proceed with a development opportunity, the
development costs ordinarily will be charged against income for the then-current
period. Any such charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations for the period in which the charge is taken.
27
COMPETITION FROM OTHER RETAIL FORMATS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE REVENUES
GENERATED BY OUR PROPERTIES, RESULTING IN A REDUCTION IN FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR
DISTRIBUTION TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS.
There are numerous shopping facilities that compete with our Properties in
attracting retailers to lease space. In addition, retailers at our Properties
face competition for customers from:
|X| Discount shopping centers
|X| Outlet malls
|X| Wholesale clubs
|X| Direct mail
|X| Telemarketing
|X| Television shopping networks
|X| Shopping via the Internet
Each of these competitive factors could adversely affect the amount of
rents that we are able to collect from our tenants, thereby reducing our
revenues and the funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
SINCE OUR SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED PRINCIPALLY IN THE SOUTHEASTERN
AND MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES, OUR FINANCIAL POSITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION TO SHAREHOLDERS ARE SUBJECT GENERALLY TO
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THESE REGIONS.
Our properties are located principally in the southeastern and midwestern
Unites States. Our properties located in the southeastern United States
accounted for approximately 51.7% of our total revenues from all properties for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and currently include 40 Malls, 20
Associated Centers, five Community Centers and one Office Building. Our
properties located in the midwestern United States accounted for approximately
23.8% of our total revenues from all properties for the three months March 31,
2006 and currently include 20 Malls and three Associated Centers. Our results of
operations and funds available for distribution to shareholders therefore will
be subject generally to economic conditions in the southeastern and midwestern
United States. We will continue to look for opportunities to geographically
diversify our portfolio in order to minimize dependency on any particular
region; however, the expansion of the portfolio through both acquisitions and
developments is contingent on many factors including consumer demand,
competition and economic conditions.
CERTAIN OF OUR SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTIES ARE SUBJECT TO OWNERSHIP INTERESTS
HELD BY THIRD PARTIES, WHOSE INTERESTS MAY CONFLICT WITH OURS AND THEREBY
CONSTRAIN US FROM TAKING ACTIONS CONCERNING THESE PROPERTIES WHICH OTHERWISE
WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COMPANY AND OUR STOCKHOLDERS.
We own partial interests in eight malls, six associated centers, three
community centers and one office building. We manage all of these properties
except for Governor's Square, Governor's Plaza and Kentucky Oaks. A property
manager affiliated with the managing general partner performs the property
management services for these properties and receives a fee for its services.
The managing partner of each of these three Properties controls the cash flow
distributions, although our approval is required for certain major decisions.
Springdale Center in Mobile, AL and Wilkes-Barre Township Marketplace in
Wilkes-Barre Township, PA, are managed by a third party that receives a fee for
its services. Springdale Center and Wilkes-Barre Township Marketplace were sold
in May 2006.
Where we serve as managing general partner of the partnerships that own our
properties, we may have certain fiduciary responsibilities to the other partners
28
in those partnerships. In certain cases, the approval or consent of the other
partners is required before we may sell, finance, expand or make other
significant changes in the operations of such properties. To the extent such
approvals or consents are required, we may experience difficulty in, or may be
prevented from, implementing our plans with respect to expansion, development,
financing or other similar transactions with respect to such properties.
With respect to Governor's Square, Governor's Plaza and Kentucky Oaks we do
not have day-to-day operational control or control over certain major decisions,
including the timing and amount of distributions, which could result in
decisions by the managing general partner that do not fully reflect our
interests. This includes decisions relating to the requirements that we must
satisfy in order to maintain our status as a REIT for tax purposes. However,
decisions relating to sales, expansion and disposition of all or substantially
all of the assets and financings are subject to approval by the Operating
Partnership.
CERTAIN AGREEMENTS WITH PRIOR OWNERS OF PROPERTIES THAT WE HAVE ACQUIRED MAY
INHIBIT OUR ABILITY TO ENTER INTO FUTURE SALE OR REFINANCING TRANSACTIONS
AFFECTING SUCH PROPERTIES, WHICH OTHERWISE WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE
COMPANY AND OUR STOCKHOLDERS.
Certain Properties that we originally acquired from third parties had
unrealized gain attributable to the difference between the fair market value of
such Properties and the third parties' adjusted tax basis in the Properties
immediately prior to their contribution of such Properties to the Operating
Partnership pursuant to our acquisition. For this reason, a taxable sale by us
of any of such Properties, or a significant reduction in the debt encumbering
such Properties, could result in adverse tax consequences to the third parties
who contributed these properties in exchange for interests in the Operating
Partnership. Under the terms of these transactions, we have generally agreed
that we either will not sell or refinance such an acquired Property for a number
of years in any transaction that would trigger adverse tax consequences for the
parties from whom we acquired such Property, or else we will reimburse such
parties for all or a portion of the additional taxes they are required to pay as
a result of the transaction. Accordingly, these agreements may cause us not to
engage in future sale or refinancing transactions affecting such Properties
which otherwise would be in the best interests of the Company and our
stockholders, or may increase the costs to us of engaging in such transactions.
THE LOSS OR BANKRUPTCY OF A MAJOR TENANT COULD NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL
POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
In the three months ended March 31, 2006, no tenant accounted for 5% or
more of revenues except for The Limited Stores Inc. (including Intimate Brands,
Inc.), which accounted for approximately 5.2% of our total revenues. The loss or
bankruptcy of this key tenant could negatively affect our financial position and
results of operations.
OUR FINANCIAL POSITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR
DISTRIBUTION TO SHAREHOLDERS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ANY ECONOMIC
DOWNTURN AFFECTING THE OPERATING RESULTS AT OUR PROPERTIES IN THE NASHVILLE,
TENNESSEE AREA, WHICH IS OUR SINGLE LARGEST MARKET.
Our properties located in Nashville, TN accounted for 5.3% of our revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. No other market accounted for more
than 3.1% of our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Our
financial position and results of operations will therefore be affected by the
results experienced at properties located in the Nashville, TN area.
RISING INTEREST RATES COULD BOTH INCREASE OUR BORROWING COSTS, THEREBY ADVERSELY
AFFECTING OUR CASH FLOW AND THE AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTIONS TO OUR
STOCKHOLDERS, AND DECREASE OUR STOCK PRICE, IF INVESTORS SEEK HIGHER YIELDS
THROUGH OTHER INVESTMENTS.
29
An environment of rising interest rates could lead holders of our
securities to seek higher yields through other investments, which could
adversely affect the market price of our stock. One of the factors that may
influence the price of our stock in public markets is the annual distribution
rate we pay as compared with the yields on alternative investments. Numerous
other factors, such as governmental regulatory action and tax laws, could have a
significant impact on the future market price of our stock. In addition,
increases in market interest rates could result in increased borrowing costs for
us, which may adversely affect our cash flow and the amounts available for
distributions to our stockholders.
RECENT CHANGES IN THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF CORPORATE DIVIDENDS
MAY MAKE OUR STOCK LESS ATTRACTIVE TO INVESTORS, THEREBY LOWERING OUR STOCK
PRICE.
In May 2003, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends
received by individual taxpayers was reduced generally from 38.6% to 15% (from
January 1, 2003 through 2008). However, dividends payable by REITs are generally
not eligible for such treatment. Although this legislation did not have a
directly adverse effect on the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the
more favorable treatment for non-REIT dividends could cause individual investors
to consider investments in non-REIT corporations as more attractive relative to
an investment in a REIT, which could have an adverse impact on the market price
of our stock.
CERTAIN OF OUR CREDIT FACILITIES, THE LOSS OF WHICH COULD HAVE A MATERIAL,
ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, ARE
CONDITIONED UPON THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP CONTINUING TO BE MANAGED BY CERTAIN
MEMBERS OF ITS CURRENT SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND BY SUCH MEMBERS OF SENIOR
MANAGEMENT CONTINUING TO OWN A SIGNIFICANT DIRECT OR INDIRECT EQUITY INTEREST IN
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP.
Certain of the Operating Partnership's lines of credit are conditioned upon
the Operating Partnership continuing to be managed by certain members of its
current senior management and by such members of senior management continuing to
own a significant direct or indirect equity interest in the Operating
Partnership (including any shares of our common stock owned by such members of
senior management may hold in us). If the failure of one or more of these
conditions resulted in the loss of these credit facilities and we were unable to
obtain suitable replacement financing, such loss could have a material, adverse
impact on our financial position and results of operations.
OUR INSURANCE COVERAGE MAY CHANGE IN THE FUTURE, AND MAY NOT INCLUDE COVERAGE
FOR ACTS OF TERRORISM.
The general liability and property casualty insurance policies on our
Properties currently include loss resulting from acts of terrorism, whether
foreign or domestic. The cost of general liability and property casualty
insurance policies that include coverage for acts of terrorism has risen
significantly post-September 11, 2001. The cost of coverage for acts of
terrorism is currently mitigated by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act ("TRIA").
If TRIA is not extended beyond its current expiration date of December 31, 2007,
we may incur higher insurance costs and greater difficulty in obtaining
insurance that covers terrorist-related damages. Our tenants may also experience
similar difficulties. We are unable at this time to predict whether we will
continue our policy coverage as currently structured when our policies are up
for renewal on December 31, 2006.
RISKS RELATED TO FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS
----------------------------------------
IF WE FAIL TO QUALIFY AS A REIT IN ANY TAXABLE YEAR, OUR FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR
DISTRIBUTION TO STOCKHOLDERS WILL BE REDUCED.
30
We intend to continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the
Internal Revenue Code. Although we believe that we are organized and operate in
such a manner, no assurance can be given that we currently qualify and in the
future will continue to qualify as a REIT. Such qualification involves the
application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for
which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The
determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within
our control may affect our ability to qualify. In addition, no assurance can be
given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court
decisions will not significantly change the tax laws with respect to
qualification or its corresponding federal income tax consequences.
If in any taxable year we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not
be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our
taxable income and we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable
income at regular corporate rates. Unless entitled to relief under certain
statutory provisions, we also would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for
the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost.
As a result, the funds available for distribution to our stockholders would be
reduced for each of the years involved. We currently intend to operate in a
manner designed to qualify as a REIT. However, it is possible that future
economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our board of
directors, with the consent of a majority of our stockholders, to revoke the
REIT election.
ANY ISSUANCE OR TRANSFER OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK TO ANY PERSON IN EXCESS OF THE
APPLICABLE LIMITS ON OWNERSHIP NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN OUR STATUS AS A REIT WOULD
BE DEEMED VOID AB INITIO, AND THOSE SHARES WOULD AUTOMATICALLY BE TRANSFERRED TO
A NON-AFFILIATED CHARITABLE TRUST.
To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more
than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or
indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year. Our
certificate of incorporation generally prohibits ownership of more than 6% of
the outstanding shares of our capital stock by any single stockholder determined
by vote, value or number of shares (other than Charles Lebovitz, our Chief
Executive Officer, David Jacobs, Richard Jacobs and their affiliates under the
Internal Revenue Code's attribution rules). The affirmative vote of 66 (2)/3% of
our outstanding voting stock is required to amend this provision.
Our board of directors may, subject to certain conditions, waive the
applicable ownership limit upon receipt of a ruling from the IRS or an opinion
of counsel to the effect that such ownership will not jeopardize our status as a
REIT. Absent any such waiver, however, any issuance or transfer of our capital
stock to any person in excess of the applicable ownership limit or any issuance
or transfer of shares of such stock which would cause us to be beneficially
owned by fewer than 100 persons, will be null and void and the intended
transferee will acquire no rights to the stock. Instead, such issuance or
transfer with respect to that number of shares that would be owned by the
transferee in excess of the ownership limit provision would be deemed void ab
initio and those shares would automatically be transferred to a trust for the
exclusive benefit of a charitable beneficiary to be designated by us, with a
trustee designated by us, but who would not be affiliated with us or with the
prohibited owner. Any acquisition of our capital stock and continued holding or
ownership of our capital stock constitutes, under our certificate of
incorporation, a continuous representation of compliance with the applicable
ownership limit.
IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN OUR STATUS AS A REIT AND AVOID THE IMPOSITION OF CERTAIN
ADDITIONAL TAXES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, WE MUST SATISFY MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS, WHICH MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF
CASH WE MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO RETAIN FOR USE IN GROWING OUR
BUSINESS.
To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we
generally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least
90% of our taxable income after certain adjustments. However, to the extent that
31
we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90% but
less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we will be subject to
tax on the undistributed amount at ordinary and capital gains corporate tax
rates, as the case may be. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible
excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid by us
during each calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income
for such calendar year, 95% of our capital gain net income for the calendar year
and any amount of such income that was not distributed in prior years. In the
case of property acquisitions, including our initial formation, where individual
properties are contributed to our Operating Partnership for Operating
Partnership units, we have assumed the tax basis and depreciation schedules of
the entities' contributing properties. The relatively low tax basis of such
contributed properties may have the effect of increasing the cash amounts we are
required to distribute as dividends, thereby potentially limiting the amount of
cash we might otherwise have been able to retain for use in growing our
business. This low tax basis may also have the effect of reducing or eliminating
the portion of distributions made by us that are treated as a non-taxable return
of capital.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
---------------------------------------------
THE OWNERSHIP LIMIT DESCRIBED ABOVE, AS WELL AS CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN OUR
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS, OUR STOCKHOLDER
RIGHTS PLAN, AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF DELAWARE LAW MAY HINDER ANY ATTEMPT TO
ACQUIRE US.
Certain provisions of Delaware law, as well as of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and agreements to which we are a party,
may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a third party from
making an acquisition proposal for us and may inhibit a change in control that
some, or a majority, of our stockholders might believe to be in their best
interest or that could give our stockholders the opportunity to realize a
premium over the then-prevailing market prices for their shares. These
provisions and agreements may be summarized as follows:
|X| THE OWNERSHIP LIMIT - As described above, to maintain our status as a
REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of
our outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by
five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to
include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year. Our
certificate of incorporation generally prohibits ownership of more
than 6% of the outstanding shares of our capital stock by any single
stockholder determined by value (other than Charles Lebovitz, David
Jacobs, Richard Jacobs and their affiliates under the Internal Revenue
Code's attribution rules). In addition to preserving our status as a
REIT, the ownership limit may have the effect of precluding an
acquisition of control of us without the approval of our board of
directors.
|X| CLASSIFIED BOARD OF DIRECTORS; REMOVAL FOR CAUSE - Our certificate of
incorporation provides for a board of directors divided into three
classes, with one class elected each year to serve for a three-year
term. As a result, at least two annual meetings of stockholders may be
required for the stockholders to change a majority of our board of
directors. In addition, our stockholders can only remove directors for
cause and only by a vote of 75% of the outstanding voting stock.
Collectively, these provisions make it more difficult to change the
composition of our board of directors and may have the effect of
encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender offers or other
unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with our board of directors
rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts.
32
|X| ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS - Our bylaws
establish advance notice procedures with regard to stockholder
proposals relating to the nomination of candidates for election as
directors or new business to be brought before meetings of our
stockholders. These procedures generally require advance written
notice of any such proposals, containing prescribed information, to be
given to our Secretary at our principal executive offices not less
than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the meeting.
|X| VOTE REQUIRED TO AMEND BYLAWS - A vote of 66 (2)/3% of the outstanding
voting stock is necessary to amend our bylaws.
|X| STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN - We have a stockholder rights plan, which may
delay, deter or prevent a change in control unless the acquirer
negotiates with our board of directors and the board of directors
approves the transaction. The rights plan generally would be triggered
if an entity, group or person acquires (or announces a plan to
acquire) 15% or more of our common stock. If such transaction is not
approved by our board of directors, the effect of the stockholder
rights plan would be to allow our stockholders to purchase shares of
our common stock, or the common stock or other merger consideration
paid by the acquiring entity, at an effective 50% discount.
|X| DELAWARE ANTI-TAKEOVER STATUTE - We are a Delaware corporation and are
subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In
general, Section 203 prevents an "interested stockholder" (defined
generally as a person owning 15% or more of a company's outstanding
voting stock) from engaging in a "business combination" (as defined in
Section 203) with us for three years following the date that person
becomes an interested stockholder unless:
(a) before that person became an interested holder, our board of
directors approved the transaction in which the interested holder
became an interested stockholder or approved the business
combination;
(b) upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
interested stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the
interested stockholder owns 85% of our voting stock outstanding
at the time the transaction commenced (excluding stock held by
directors who are also officers and by employee stock plans that
do not provide employees with the right to determine
confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be
tendered in a tender or exchange offer); or
(c) following the transaction in which that person became an
interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by
our board of directors and authorized at a meeting of
stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
two-thirds of our outstanding voting stock not owned by the
interested stockholder.
Under Section 203, these restrictions also do not apply to certain
business combinations proposed by an interested stockholder following
the announcement or notification of certain extraordinary transactions
involving us and a person who was not an interested stockholder during
the previous three years or who became an interested stockholder with
the approval of a majority of our directors, if that extraordinary
transaction is approved or not opposed by a majority of the directors
who were directors before any person became an interested stockholder
in the previous three years or who were recommended for election or
elected to succeed such directors by a majority of directors then in
office.
33
CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS HELD BY MEMBERS OF OUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT MAY TEND TO
CREATE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN SUCH INDIVIDUALS AND THE INTERESTS OF THE
COMPANY AND OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP.
|X| RETAINED PROPERTY INTERESTS - Members of our senior management own
interests in certain real estate properties that were retained by them
at the time of our initial public offering. These consist primarily of
outparcels at certain of our properties, which are being offered for
sale through our management company. As a result, these members of our
senior management have interests that could conflict with the
interests of the Company, our shareholders and the Operating
Partnership with respect to any transaction involving these
properties.
|X| TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE SALE OR REFINANCING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES -
Since certain of our properties had unrealized gain attributable to
the difference between the fair market value and adjusted tax basis in
such properties immediately prior to their contribution to the
Operating Partnership, a taxable sale of any such properties, or a
significant reduction in the debt encumbering such properties, could
cause adverse tax consequences to the members of our senior management
who owned interests in our predecessor entities. As a result, members
of our senior management might not favor a sale of a property or a
significant reduction in debt even though such a sale or reduction
could be beneficial to us and the Operating Partnership. Our bylaws
provide that any decision relating to the potential sale of any
property that would result in a disproportionately higher taxable
income for members of our senior management than for us and our
stockholders, or that would result in a significant reduction in such
property's debt, must be made by a majority of the independent
directors of the board of directors. The Operating Partnership is
required, in the case of such a sale, to distribute to its partners,
at a minimum, all of the net cash proceeds from such sale up to an
amount reasonably believed necessary to enable members of our senior
management to pay any income tax liability arising from such sale.
|X| INTERESTS IN OTHER ENTITIES; POLICIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS -
Certain entities owned in whole or in part by members of our senior
management, including the construction company that built or renovated
most of our properties, may continue to perform services for, or
transact business with, us and the Operating Partnership. Furthermore,
certain property tenants are affiliated with members of our senior
management. Accordingly, although our bylaws provide that any contract
or transaction between us or the Operating Partnership and one or more
of our directors or officers, or between us or the Operating
Partnership and any other entity in which one or more of our directors
or officers are directors or officers or have a financial interest,
must be approved by our disinterested directors or stockholders after
the material facts of the relationship or interest of the contract or
transaction are disclosed or are known to them, these affiliations
could nevertheless create conflicts between the interests of these
members of senior management and the interests of the Company, our
shareholders and the Operating Partnership in relation to any
transactions between us and any of these entities.
ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Effective as of March 6, 2006, we issued 1,480,066 shares of
common stock to seven holders of common units in the Operating
Partnership who exercised their exchange rights, in exchange for
1,480,066 common units of limited partnership interest. We
believe the issuance of these shares was exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof because this issuance
did not involve a public offering or sale. No underwriters,
brokers or finders were involved in this transaction.
34
(c) The following table presents information with respect to
repurchases of common stock made by us during the three months
ended March 31, 2006:
Average Total Number of Maximum Number of
Total Number Price Shares Purchased as Shares that May Yet
of Shares Paid per Part of a Publicly Be Purchased
Period Purchased (1) Share (2) Announced Plan Under the Plan
------ ------------- --------- ------------------- -------------------
January 1-31, 2006 -- -- -- --
February 1-28, 2006 -- -- -- --
March 1-31, 2006 636 $ 42.15 -- --
---------------- ---------------- --------------------- ---------------------
Total 636 $ 42.15 -- --
================ ================ ===================== =====================
(1) Represents shares surrendered to the Company by
employees to satisfy federal and state income tax
withholding requirements related to the vesting of
shares of restricted stock issued under the CBL &
Associates Properties, Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan.
(2) Represents the market value of the common stock on the
vesting date for the shares of restricted stock, which
was used to determine the number of shares required to
be surrendered to satisfy income tax withholding
requirements.
ITEM 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
ITEM 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
ITEM 5: Other Information
None
ITEM 6: Exhibits
12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Dividends
31.1 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
by the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)
by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)
by the Chief Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
35
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC.
/s/ John N. Foy
--------------------------------------------------------
John N. Foy
Vice Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
Date: May 10, 2006
36
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number Description
--------- ------------
12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Dividends
31.1 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
by the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)
by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b)
by the Chief Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
37