424B3
The
information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not
complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus
supplement is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to
buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale
is not permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
A filing fee of $28,221.52, calculated in accordance with
Rule 457(r), has been transmitted to the SEC in connection
with the securities offered from the registration statement
(Reg. Nos. 333-138010 and 333-138010-01)
by means of this prospectus supplement.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
OCTOBER 17, 2006
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED OCTOBER 16,
2006
7,500,000 Shares
Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust
Each Share of Trust Stock
Represents One Beneficial Interest in the Trust
We are selling 7,500,000 shares of our trust stock, each
representing one beneficial interest in the trust. The purpose
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust is to hold 100% of the
interests of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC. Each
beneficial interest in the trust corresponds to one interest of
Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC.
The shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
MIC. On October 13, 2006, the closing price of
shares of our trust stock on the New York Stock Exchange was
$30.43.
The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional
1,125,000 shares of trust stock from us at the public
offering price, less the underwriting discounts, within
30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement to
cover overallotments.
Investing in the shares involves risks. See Risk
Factors on
page S-14
of this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
Proceeds to Us
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Delivery of the shares will be made on or
about ,
2006.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch &
Co. |
Citigroup |
Credit
Suisse |
|
Macquarie Securities (USA)
Inc.
|
|
The date of this prospectus supplement
is ,
2006.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-iii
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
S-14
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
S-21
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
|
S-23
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-85
|
|
|
S-87
|
|
|
S-88
|
|
|
S-92
|
|
|
S-92
|
|
|
S-93
|
|
|
S-93
|
|
|
S-95
|
|
PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
|
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
|
|
ii
|
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR TERM SHEET
|
|
ii
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
|
ii
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
|
|
iv
|
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS
BY REFERENCE
|
|
iv
|
MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY
|
|
1
|
SELLING STOCKHOLDER
|
|
3
|
RISK FACTORS
|
|
4
|
USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
8
|
OUR MANAGER
|
|
9
|
DESCRIPTION OF SHARES
|
|
27
|
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
36
|
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
|
|
48
|
LEGAL MATTERS
|
|
50
|
EXPERTS
|
|
50
|
Australian banking regulations that govern the operations of
Macquarie Bank Limited and all of its subsidiaries, including
our Manager, require the following statements: Investments in
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust are not deposits with or
other liabilities of Macquarie Bank Limited or of any Macquarie
Group company and are subject to investment risk, including
possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal
invested. Neither Macquarie Bank Limited nor any other member
company of the Macquarie Group guarantees the performance of
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust or the repayment of
capital from Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust.
S-i
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have
not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide
you with different information. If anyone provides you with
different information, you should not rely on it. We are not,
and the underwriters are not, making an offer to sell these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
In this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus,
we rely on and refer to information and statistics regarding
market data and the industries of our businesses and investments
obtained from internal surveys, market research, independent
industry publications and other publicly available information,
including publicly available information regarding listed stock.
The information and statistics are based on industry surveys and
our Managers and its affiliates experience in the
industry.
S-ii
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
This document is in two parts. The first part is the prospectus
supplement, which discusses the terms of this offering of shares
of our trust stock. The second part is the accompanying
prospectus, dated October 16, 2006, that is also a part of
this document. This prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus are part of a registration statement that we filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, using the
SECs shelf registration rules. In this prospectus
supplement, we provide you with specific information about the
terms of this offering of the shares. Both this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus include important
information about us, the shares and other information you
should know before investing in the shares. This prospectus
supplement also adds to, updates and changes some of the
information contained in the accompanying prospectus. To the
extent that any statement that we make in this prospectus
supplement is inconsistent with the statements made in the
accompanying prospectus, the statements made in the accompanying
prospectus are deemed modified or superseded by the statements
made in this prospectus supplement. You should assume that the
information appearing in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, as well as the information contained in
any document incorporated by reference herein or therein, is
accurate as of the date of each such document only, unless the
information specifically indicates that another date applies.
See Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference.
S-iii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information incorporated by reference
or contained elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. You should read
carefully all of the information contained in or incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus, including the information set forth under the
caption Risk Factors beginning on
page S-14
of this prospectus supplement and on page 4 of the
accompanying prospectus, respectively, and our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes thereto incorporated
by reference herein before making a decision to invest in shares
of our trust stock.
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust, a Delaware statutory
trust that we refer to as the trust, owns its businesses and
investments through Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company that we refer to as the
company. Except as otherwise specified, Macquarie
Infrastructure Company, MIC, we,
us, and our refer to both the trust and
the company and its subsidiaries together. The company owns the
businesses located in the United States through a Delaware
corporation, Macquarie Infrastructure Company Inc., or MIC Inc.,
and a business located outside of the United States through a
Delaware limited liability company. Macquarie Infrastructure
Management (USA) Inc., the company that we refer to as our
Manager, is part of the Macquarie Group of companies. References
to the Macquarie Group include Macquarie Bank Limited and its
subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide.
Overview
We own, operate and hold investments in a diversified group of
infrastructure businesses primarily in the United States. We
believe our infrastructure businesses, which offer basic
everyday services, have a sustainable and stable cash flow
profile and offer the potential for capital growth.
Traditionally, infrastructure businesses have been owned by
governments or private investors or have formed part of
vertically integrated companies. By owning shares of our trust
stock, investors have an opportunity to participate directly in
the ownership of these businesses.
Our new businesses, all of which we acquired in the last six
months, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
The Gas Company, or TGC, a gas production and distribution
business in Hawaii;
|
|
|
|
a 50% ownership interest in IMTT Holdings, the owner/operator of
a bulk liquid storage terminal business, International-Matex
Tank Terminals, or IMTT; and
|
|
|
|
Trajen Holdings, which owns and operates 23 fixed base
operations, or FBOs, that are being integrated into our existing
airport services business, Atlantic Aviation.
|
Our existing businesses consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Aviation, an airport services business that operates 19
FBOs in the United States;
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Parking, an off-airport parking business; and
|
|
|
|
a district energy business, conducted through Thermal Chicago
and Northwind Aladdin.
|
In August 2006, we disposed of our investment in Macquarie
Communications Infrastructure Group, or MCG, and in October
2006, we disposed of our 17.5% interest in the holding company
that owns South East Water, or SEW, a regulated water utility in
southeastern England. Additionally, in August 2006, we entered
into an agreement to dispose of our interest in the holding
company that owns 50% of the company that operates Yorkshire
Link, or YLL, a
19-mile toll
road south of Leeds in England. In September 2006, our 50%
partner in this holding company exercised their
pre-emptive
rights over our interest. We expect this transaction to close by
the end of February 2007.
S-1
Our
Infrastructure Businesses
Private investment in infrastructure is a relatively new trend
in the United States, although well established in other
financial markets. Infrastructure businesses are generally
characterized by the essential nature of the services they
provide. Our existing businesses, such as our district energy
and airport parking businesses, and our new businesses,
including our gas production and distribution business, provide
basic, everyday services to our customers. In addition, our
infrastructure businesses, such as our FBOs and our bulk liquid
storage terminal business, have long-lived, high-value physical
assets with low ongoing maintenance capital expenditure
requirements (in the case of our FBOs), are scalable, and offer
significant barriers to entry for new participants. We invest in
infrastructure businesses that we believe offer sustainable cash
flows and the opportunity for future growth. We focus on the
ownership and operation of infrastructure businesses with
long-lived physical assets in the following categories:
|
|
|
|
|
user pays, such as our airport services,
airport parking and bulk liquid storage terminal businesses, the
revenues of which are derived from per-use or rental charges;
|
|
|
|
contracted, such as our district energy
business, a majority of the revenues of which are derived from
long-term contracts with governments or other
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
regulated, such as the utility operations of
our gas production and distribution business.
|
Infrastructure assets tend to be long-lived, require minimal or
recoverable maintenance capital expenditure and are generally
not subject to major technological change or rapid physical
deterioration. This typically means that significant cash flow
is available from infrastructure business to service debt, make
distributions to shareholders and to renew and expand the
business. Together with the potential capital appreciation
realized through the active management of these businesses,
investment in infrastructure offers the potential for both
income and growth.
S-2
Our infrastructure businesses provide sustainable and growing
long-term cash flows due to consistent customer demand and the
businesses strong competitive positions, which result from
high barriers to entry and our active management of our
businesses. We believe the ongoing cash flows of our
infrastructure businesses are protected by the nature of our
businesses, including:
|
|
|
|
|
They own long-lived, high-value physical assets and generate
predictable revenue streams.
|
|
|
|
All of our businesses, and particularly our airport services,
district energy and bulk liquid storage terminal businesses,
enjoy consistent, relatively inelastic demand for their
services, which provides for stability of cash flows.
|
|
|
|
Our businesses, including our bulk liquid storage terminal and
gas production and distribution businesses, benefit from
preferred positions in their respective markets.
|
|
|
|
Our businesses have strong competitive positions, largely due to
high barriers to entry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
high initial development and construction costs, such as the
cost of cooling equipment and distribution pipes for our
district energy business and the regulated distribution assets
for our gas production and distribution business;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining suitable land, such as the waterfront
land owned by our bulk liquid storage terminal business;
|
|
|
|
long-term, exclusive concessions or leases and customer
contracts, such as those held by our airport services and
district energy businesses; and
|
|
|
|
lack of cost-effective alternatives to customers in the
foreseeable future, such as our district energy business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many of our businesses are scalable such that relatively small
amounts of growth related capital expenditure can result in
significant increases in EBITDA.
|
We actively manage our businesses by seeking to grow revenues
while controlling expenses, improving marketing efforts to
attract customers to use the services provided by our user
pays and regulated businesses, and optimizing
capital structures, thereby maximizing the cash available for
distribution to holders of our trust stock. We believe we can
grow our businesses at rates above the fundamental drivers
associated with these businesses. For example, the fundamental
driver of revenue growth for our airport parking business is the
level of commercial airline passenger enplanements. The Federal
Aviation Administration projects increases in the commercial
passenger enplanements of approximately 3% per year. We
believe that our ability to effectively market our services and
manage yield will enable us to grow revenue in this business at
rates above those forecasted by the Federal Aviation
Administration.
The revenues generated by our infrastructure businesses can
generally be expected to keep pace with inflation due to the
pricing power often enjoyed by user pays businesses,
the price increases built into the agreements with customers of
contracted businesses, and the inflation and cost
pass-through adjustments typically provided by the regulatory
process to our regulated businesses. In addition, we
employ interest rate swaps in connection with the majority of
our businesses floating rate debt to protect our earnings
from the higher costs that may result from interest rate
increases.
Estimated
Cash Available for Distribution
We analyze our businesses cash flows and results of
operations on an ongoing basis to estimate cash available for
distribution to shareholders. We believe this is a critical
analysis as it demonstrates over time our continuing ability to
make distributions to our shareholders.
We use cash from operations, a GAAP measure, as the starting
point of this estimation. In the case of TGC, where this
information is not available for historical periods prior to our
acquisition, we use EBITDA instead as we believe it to be a
reasonable proxy for cash from operations because of TGCs
minimal income tax liability during the periods presented. Cash
from operations data for TGC will be available for future
periods and, for future periods, we will use cash from
operations as the basis for estimating TGCs contribution
to our cash available for distribution.
S-3
In calculating our estimated cash available for distribution in
the table below, we made two general types of adjustments to
cash from operations (or EBITDA). First, we made adjustments for
certain cash items, excluding those that we believe do not
affect estimated cash available for distribution over time and
including those that we believe directly affect estimated cash
available for distribution. Second, we made adjustments
reflecting the full period impact of our acquisitions and
disposals consummated or planned during the current year.
The first type of adjustments discussed above are generally
categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Regularly recurring cash items not included in cash from
operations, such as annualized cash capital expenditures and
principal repayments. We deduct these items since they directly
impact estimated cash available for distribution;
|
|
|
|
Regularly recurring items included in cash from operations that
we believe result from timing of cash payments and receipts,
such as movements in working capital. We adjust to exclude these
items as we do not believe they impact estimated cash available
for distribution over time;
|
|
|
|
Periodically recurring cash payments included in cash from
operations but funded, or expected to be funded, from equity
contributions or external financing, such as acquisition,
integration and broken deal costs. We adjust to exclude these
items as they are, or are expected to be, externally funded and
do not directly impact estimated cash available for
distribution; and
|
|
|
|
Periodic cash items not included in cash from operations that we
expect to occur only occasionally, such as settlements of
pre-acquisition items and release of debt reserves. We adjust to
include these items as they directly impact estimated cash
available for distribution.
|
We believe the categories and examples of adjustments to cash
from operations (or EBITDA) presented above covers a majority of
the adjustments we have made to date. However, the categories of
adjustments set forth above are for illustration purposes only
and are not a complete list of adjustments that we have made or
may make.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended
December 31, 2005, our then-existing businesses and
investments generated estimated cash available for distribution
of $31.2 million, or $1.15 per share, and
$47.9 million, or $1.77 per share, respectively.
In addition to the above, we have also made adjustments to cash
from operations to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated impact of owning businesses acquired recently for
the full periods presented; and
|
|
|
|
The estimated impact of the disposal of our MCG and SEW
investments and the proposed disposal of our YLL interest.
|
We have made these adjustments to more accurately reflect our
estimate of cash available for distribution for the periods
presented based on the company structure we believe would have
been in place had the acquisitions, disposal and planned
disposals been consummated at the beginning of the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
IMTT
|
|
|
TGC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash from Operations
|
|
$
|
43,547
|
|
|
$
|
24,788
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,335
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,022
|
(2)
|
|
|
26,022
|
|
Cash items not included in cash
from operations(3)
|
|
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,116
|
)
|
|
|
(11,289
|
)
|
Items in cash from operations due
to timing(4)
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
Items in cash from operations
externally funded(5)
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,964
|
|
Divestments of MCG, YLL and SEW(6)
|
|
|
(18,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,205
|
)
|
Additional interest expense(7)
|
|
|
(4,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,544
|
)
|
|
|
(12,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for
Distribution
|
|
$
|
22,087
|
|
|
$
|
24,788
|
|
|
$
|
11,362
|
|
|
$
|
58,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Cash from operations for IMTT
consists of:
|
S-4
|
|
|
|
|
$28,000 distribution guaranteed by the Shareholders
Agreement; net of
|
|
|
|
the estimated incremental base management fee of $3,213.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
EBITDA for TGC consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$27,923 of EBITDA generated by TGC; net of
|
|
|
|
the estimated incremental base management fee of $1,325; and
|
|
|
|
state taxes of $576.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Cash items not included in cash
from operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
TGC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
(5,099
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,215
|
)
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
Minority interests in estimated
cash available for distribution
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Cash settlement of pre-acquisition
item
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Items in cash from operations due
to timing consists entirely of working capital movements.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Items in cash from operations
externally funded consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
Costs of unsuccessful acquisition
bids
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Impact of divestments consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
MCG
|
|
$
|
(3,230
|
)
|
Yorkshire Link
|
|
|
(6,628
|
)
|
SEW
|
|
|
(8,347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Additional interest expense for MIC
relates to our Airport Services Business new financing that
resulted in $100 million in additional debt, net of reduced
interest expense related to a lower margin obtained on the
refinanced portion. Additional interest expense for TGC relates
to a new $160 million debt facility at TGC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
IMTT
|
|
|
TGC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash from Operations
|
|
$
|
23,401
|
|
|
$
|
6,197
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,598
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,596
|
(2)
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
Cash items not included in cash
from operations(3)
|
|
|
4,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,450
|
)
|
|
|
893
|
|
Items in cash from operations due
to timing(4)
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
Items in cash from operations
externally funded(5)
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Divestments of MCG, YLL and SEW(6)
|
|
|
(6,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,803
|
)
|
Interest expense adjustment(7)
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,664
|
)
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for
Distribution
|
|
$
|
25,760
|
|
|
$
|
6,197
|
|
|
$
|
5,482
|
|
|
$
|
37,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Cash from operations for IMTT
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7,000 distribution for the first quarter had the acquisition
been consummated then; net of
|
|
|
|
the estimated incremental base management fee of $803.
|
S-5
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
EBITDA for TGC consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10,927 of EBITDA generated by TGC; net of
|
|
|
|
the estimated incremental base management fee of $331.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Cash items not included in cash
from operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
TGC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
IMTT distribution for second quarter
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
Cash capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,560
|
)
|
Principal payments
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Minority interests in estimated
cash available for distribution
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Cash settlement of pre-acquisition
item
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,343
|
|
|
$
|
(3,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Items in cash from operations due
to timing consists entirely of working capital movements.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Items in cash from operations
externally funded consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
MIC
|
|
|
TGC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Costs of unsuccessful acquisition
bids
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
Integration costs
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Impact of divestments consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
MCG
|
|
$
|
(2,180
|
)
|
Yorkshire Link
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
SEW
|
|
|
(2,673
|
)
|
Annualization of distributions
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Reduction in interest expense for
MIC relates to assumed use of proceeds from disposals and equity
raise to pay down debt. Additional interest expense for TGC
relates to a new $160 million debt facility at TGC.
|
Total estimated cash available for distribution from our
existing businesses and investments during fiscal year 2005,
adjusted for the disposal of our MCG, YLL and SEW investments
and for the pro forma contribution generated by both our bulk
liquid storage terminal business and our gas production and
distribution business, would have been $58.2 million.
Estimated cash available for distribution for the first six
months of 2006, on the same basis, would have been
$37.4 million.
While financial statements reflecting the full-year results for
our airport services business including our acquisition of
Trajen are not available, using the definition of estimated cash
available for distribution outlined above we estimate that
Trajens contribution to our estimated cash available for
distribution for the first six months of 2006 if all 23 fixed
base operations had been owned by us during the period would
have been $4.9 million. Therefore, the total estimated cash
available for distribution from both our existing businesses and
new businesses for the first six months of 2006 would have been
approximately $42.3 million. For purposes of the preceding
analysis, we have excluded the interest expense associated with
the debt outstanding under our acquisition credit facility which
we used to acquire our new businesses and which we intend to
repay in full with the proceeds of this offering, the proceeds
from the August 2006 disposal of our MCG investment, the
proceeds from the October 2006 disposal of our SEW investment
and our disposal of our interest in our toll road business,
which we expect to be concluded by the end of February 2007.
Our
Manager
Our Manager, a member of the Macquarie Group, is responsible for
our
day-to-day
operations and affairs and actively oversees the management
teams of our operating businesses. Together with its
subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide, the Macquarie Group
provides specialist investment, advisory, trading and financial
S-6
services in select markets around the world. The Macquarie Group
is a global leader in advising on the acquisition, disposition,
management and financing of infrastructure assets and the
management of infrastructure investment vehicles on behalf of
third-party investors.
Our Managers active involvement in each of our businesses
enables our operational management teams to benefit from the
Macquarie Groups extensive industry experience and
regulatory knowledge, as well as its expertise in identifying,
valuing and financing the acquisition of infrastructure assets.
This relationship enables the operational management teams to
focus on expanding and strengthening the operations of their
respective businesses. Our acquisition opportunities are
identified largely by the Macquarie Groups more than 400
personnel in various advisory roles around the world. In
addition, we can access the experience and expertise of the more
than 480 people who manage the infrastructure businesses and
investments to improve the performance and to optimize the
capital structure of those businesses. The Macquarie
Groups focus on infrastructure has produced annualized
returns to investors of 17.8% as of June 30, 2006, since
its first infrastructure entity was listed in December of 1996.
Under the terms of the management services agreement, we have
first priority over all entities managed by members of the
Macquarie Group within the IB Funds, or IBF, division with
respect to infrastructure acquisition opportunities within the
United States with three exceptions. These exceptions are toll
roads, airports and communication infrastructure. Please see
page 18 of the accompanying prospectus for more detail.
Strategy
Our strategy is to deliver increasing value to shareholders
through two initiatives. First, we are growing our existing
businesses by pursuing revenue growth and gross operating income
improvement, optimizing the capital structure of our businesses,
and improving the performance and the competitive position of
our controlled businesses through complementary acquisitions.
Second, we will continue to acquire businesses we believe will
provide yield accretive returns in infrastructure sectors other
than those in which our businesses and investments currently
operate. We believe our association with the Macquarie Group is
key to the successful execution of our strategy.
Operational
Strategy
We rely on the Macquarie Groups demonstrated expertise and
experience in the management of infrastructure businesses to
execute our operational strategy. In managing infrastructure
businesses, the Macquarie Group endeavors to (1) recruit
and support talented operational management teams,
(2) instill disciplined financial management consistently
across the businesses, (3) source and execute complementary
acquisitions, and (4) optimize the capital structure of the
businesses to maximize returns to shareholders.
While leveraging our relationship with the Macquarie Group to
maximize shareholder value, we will continue to pursue the
following initiatives:
|
|
|
|
|
improving and expanding our existing marketing programs;
|
|
|
|
making selective capital expenditures to renew facilities and
expand certain operations; and
|
|
|
|
strengthening our competitive position through complementary
acquisitions.
|
We believe this strategy will increase the cash generated by our
businesses by increasing revenues and improving gross operating
income.
Acquisition
Strategy
We expect our acquisition strategy to benefit from the Macquarie
Groups deep knowledge and ability to identify acquisition
opportunities in the infrastructure area. We believe it is often
the case that infrastructure opportunities are not widely
offered, well-understood or properly valued. The Macquarie Group
has significant expertise in the execution of such acquisitions,
which can be time-consuming and complex.
We intend to acquire infrastructure businesses and investments
in sectors other than those sectors in which our businesses and
investments currently operate, provided we believe we can
achieve yield accretive returns. Our focus is on acquiring
businesses in the United States. Generally, we will seek to
acquire
S-7
controlling interests, but we may from time to time acquire
minority positions in attractive sectors where those
acquisitions generate immediate dividends and where our partners
have objectives similar to our own. We will not seek to acquire
infrastructure businesses that face significant competition,
such as merchant electricity generation facilities.
Execution
of Strategy to Date
Since our initial public offering in December 2004, we have
successfully executed our strategy by improving the performance
of our existing operations and through complementary
acquisitions, and have realized growth in revenue and margins.
For example, the gross profit generated by our airport services
business grew 32% in 2005 over 2004. The revenue generated by
our airport parking business increased 16% in 2005.
Operational Strategy. We have executed our
operational strategy as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging Our Relationship with the Macquarie
Group. Our Managers expertise in
structuring and refinancing the debt of our existing and new
businesses, as well as its ability to optimize the capital
structure of all of our businesses, has contributed to our
efforts to maximize returns to shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, following substantial growth in EBITDA from our
airport services business in 2005 over 2004, we were able to
increase the level of borrowing by this business while lowering
total borrowing costs and maintaining an appropriate debt
service coverage ratio. The net proceeds have been reinvested in
our new businesses at yields that we expect will be
substantially above the cost of the borrowed funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improving and Expanding Our Existing Marketing
Programs. Centralizing the capital management and
acquisition-related activities of our businesses has enabled
management at the operating company level to focus on improving
the performance of these businesses. In particular, operating
company management personnel have been freed up to enhance
marketing efforts and the deployment of growth capital
expenditures, both of which have resulted in the generation of
increased levels of distributable cash.
|
|
|
|
Making Selective Capital Expenditures to Expand Existing
Businesses. We continue to make selected capital
expenditures in our businesses to improve facilities and expand
capacity, which we expect will produce growth in revenue, EBITDA
and cash available for distribution. Anticipated capital
expenditures include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $12.4 million during 2006 and 2007 for
upgrades and expansion of certain facilities in our existing
airport services business plus approximately $850,000 in Trajen;
|
|
|
|
approximately $8.4 million beginning in the second half of
2006 for capacity expansion of our district energy business; and
|
|
|
|
at least $191.0 million during 2006 and 2007 that IMTT
intends to spend to expand its storage facilities; IMTT has
already received contractual commitments from customers for the
majority of the additional storage capacity resulting from the
expansion, with the balance of the new capacity to be used to
service customers while their existing tanks are undergoing
maintenance over the next five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strengthening Our Competitive Position Through Complementary
Acquisitions. We have grown our existing
businesses through the successful conclusion of yield-accretive,
complementary acquisitions identified by the Macquarie Group,
which, in addition to our recent acquisition of Trajen and its
23 FBOs, include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
our acquisition of an FBO at McCarran International Airport in
Las Vegas during the third quarter of 2005, resulting in the
expansion of our airport services business to one of the fastest
growing regional economies in the United States; and
|
|
|
|
our acquisition of eight additional off-airport parking
facilities during 2005, which increased the number of airports
served by our airport parking business from 15 to 20.
|
S-8
Acquisition Strategy. We have executed our
acquisition strategy as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Yield-Accretive Acquisitions in New
Sectors. We have concluded acquisitions of
businesses in new infrastructure sectors where our existing
businesses and investments had not previously operated. Our
acquisitions of IMTT and TGC expand our operations to bulk
liquid storage and gas production and distribution,
respectively, and we expect both acquisitions to be immediately
yield-accretive.
|
|
|
|
Focusing on U.S. Acquisition
Opportunities. All of the new infrastructure
businesses we acquired operate in the United States. Following
the disposition of our investments discussed under
Recent Developments, 100% of our cash
flow will be generated by businesses located in the United
States.
|
Recent
Developments
Disposal of Investments in MCG, SEW and YLL
In August 2006, we disposed of our investment in MCG, which
generated net proceeds to us of $76.45 million, which we
used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the
MIC Inc. acquisition credit facility, and entered into
agreements relating to the disposition of our interest in the
holding company that owns 50% of the company that owns the
Yorkshire Link concession and our 17.5% interest in the holding
company that owns SEW. We completed the sale of SEW on
October 2, 2006, generating approximately
$89.5 million of net proceeds, which was also used to repay
a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the MIC Inc.
acquisition credit facility. Each of these investments had been
a part of our portfolio since our initial public offering. The
disposal of these assets is consistent with our mandate to be
the owner and operator of infrastructure businesses, primarily
in the United States.
The prices at which we sold our investments in MCG and SEW and
the price at which we have agreed to sell our investment in YLL
will generate substantial gains for our investors. We will
redeploy the proceeds of the sales, into our recently acquired
businesses. We will do so by using the proceeds to reduce our
acquisition-related indebtedness not otherwise being repaid from
the proceeds of this offering. We expect the disposition of our
investment in YLL to be concluded by the end of February 2007.
Restatement of Certain Financial Statements
On September 13, 2006, our Audit Committee determined that
we would be required to amend and restate previously issued
financial statements and other financial information for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 for
derivative instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting
during those periods. On October 13, 2006, our Audit
Committee determined that our unaudited 2005 quarterly financial
statements and financial information as well as 2005 financial
information for our airport services and airport parking
segments within Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be restated
to reflect the elimination of hedge accounting for all of our
derivative instruments. We also determined that the impact of
not qualifying for hedge accounting was not material to our
audited financial statements for the full year 2005 or the
period from April 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31,
2004.
On October 16, 2006, we filed amended quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q/A
to restate our financial statements and other financial
information for the quarterly periods noted. We also filed an
amended annual report on
Form 10-K/A
for the full year 2005 in which we corrected certain quarterly
and segment financial information for that year but did not
change the audited annual financial results.
For a more detailed discussion of the restatements, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Restatement of
Certain Financial Statements in this prospectus
supplement. Additionally, we refer you to our amended annual
report on
Form 10-K/A,
filed with the SEC on October 16, 2006, and our amended
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q/A
filed the same day, all of which are incorporated by reference
in this prospectus supplement.
S-9
Corporate
Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 125 West
55th Street, New York, NY 10019. Our telephone number is
(212) 231-1000.
You may also obtain additional information about us from our
website, www.macquarie.com/mic. Information on our
website is not a part of this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus.
The
Offering
|
|
|
Shares of Trust Stock Offered by Us |
|
7,500,000 shares |
|
Shares Outstanding After the Offering |
|
34,712,165 shares |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of the shares in
this offering, assuming a public offering price of
$30.43 per share of trust stock, which was the closing
price of our trust stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
October 13, 2006, and after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and the expenses of this
offering payable by us, will be approximately
$215.5 million, or $247.2 million if the underwriters
exercise their overallotment option in full. |
|
|
|
We intend to use the aggregate net proceeds from this offering,
including any proceeds we may receive from the exercise by the
underwriters of their overallotment option, to repay borrowings
under MIC Inc.s acquisition credit facility incurred to
finance the acquisitions of TGC, IMTT and Trajen and for general
corporate purposes. See Use of Proceeds for more
information. |
|
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations |
|
Subject to the discussion in Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Considerations in the accompanying prospectus,
although the matter is not free from doubt, in the opinion of
Shearman & Sterling LLP, the trust will be classified
as a grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As
a result, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you
generally will be treated as the beneficial owner of a pro rata
portion of the interests in the company held by the trust.
Furthermore, subject to the discussion in Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations in the
accompanying prospectus, in the opinion of Shearman &
Sterling LLP, the company will be classified as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, neither
the company nor the trust will incur U.S. federal income
tax liability; rather, each beneficial owner of shares of trust
stock will be required to take into account its allocable share
of our income, gain, loss, deduction and other items for our
taxable year ending with or within the beneficial owners
taxable year. |
|
|
|
To the extent that the company receives dividend income that
qualifies for the lower rate of tax applicable to long-term
capital gains, holders of shares of trust stock who satisfy
certain holding period requirements will recognize dividend
income that qualifies for the lower rate of tax (currently, a
maximum rate of 15%). |
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
The company anticipates that more than 90% of a holders
distributive share of the companys income during each
taxable year will be qualifying income for purposes of the
holders determination of whether such holder satisfies the
income requirements necessary to qualify as a regulated
investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
|
|
|
The company also should not be treated as engaged in a
trade or business within the United States and therefore
it should not realize income that would be treated as
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business
within the United States. |
|
|
|
Please refer to the Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations section in the accompanying prospectus for
information on the potential U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of
shares of trust stock. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
See Risk Factors and other information included or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus for a discussion of factors you should
carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our
trust stock. |
|
New York Stock Exchange Symbol |
|
MIC |
The number of shares of trust stock to be outstanding
immediately after the offering is based on shares outstanding as
of September 30, 2006 and excludes 16,869 shares
issuable upon vesting of the same number of outstanding
restricted stock units and an additional 27,258 shares
reserved for issuance under our independent directors equity
plan. Except as otherwise noted, all information in this
prospectus supplement assumes that the underwriters
overallotment option is not exercised. If the overallotment
option is exercised in full, we will issue and sell an
additional 1,125,000 shares and the number of shares of
trust stock outstanding after the offering will be 35,837,165.
S-11
Summary
Historical Financial Data
The summary financial data for Macquarie Infrastructure Company
Trust include the results of operations, cash flow and balance
sheet data of Atlantic Aviation FBO, Inc. (formerly known as
North America Capital Holding Company), or Atlantic FBO Holdco,
which was deemed to be our predecessor. We have included the
results of operations and cash flow data of Atlantic FBO Holdco
for the year ended December 31, 2003, for the period from
January 1, 2004 through July 29, 2004 and for the
period July 30, 2004 through December 22, 2004. The
period from December 23, 2004 through December 31,
2004 includes the results of operations and cash flow data for
our businesses and investments from December 23, 2004
through December 31, 2004 and the results of the company
from April 13, 2004 through December 31, 2004. The
year ended December 31, 2005 includes the full year of
results for our consolidated group, with the results of
businesses acquired during 2005 being included from their dates
of acquisition. We have included the balance sheet data of
Atlantic FBO Holdco at December 31, 2003 and our
consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005. The summary financial data for the six
months ended June 30, 2005, and as of and for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements for such periods and dates,
included in our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, incorporated
by reference in this prospectus supplement, which, in the
opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the consolidated financial data. Our
historical results are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that may be expected in the future. You should
read the following information together with the information
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
included in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, and our amended Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, all of which
is incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
The summary financial data for IMTT as at and for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of IMTT Holdings, Inc.
(formerly known as Loving Enterprises, Inc.), incorporated in
this prospectus supplement by reference from our Current Report
on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on May 16, 2006. The summary financial
data for IMTT for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and as
at and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are derived
from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of IMTT
Holdings, Inc. We own 50% of IMTT and account for this business
under the equity method of accounting.
The summary financial data for TGC as of April 30, 2006 and
for the period from July 1, 2005 to April 30, 2006,
and as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the year ended
June 30, 2005 and the period from August 8, 2003 (date
of inception) to June 30, 2004, are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of K-1 HGC Investment,
LLC and subsidiaries, incorporated in this prospectus supplement
by reference from our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on June 27, 2006. The summary financial
data for TGC for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and as
at and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements of TGC.
The summary financial data presented below represent the
historical financial information for IMTT and TGC and do not
reflect the accounting for these businesses upon completion of
the acquisitions and the operation of the businesses as a
consolidated entity. You should read this information with the
financial statements and related notes, the unaudited condensed
combined pro forma financial statements and related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement.
S-12
Macquarie
Infrastructure Company Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Year
|
|
December 23
|
|
July 30
|
|
Jan 1
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
through
|
|
through
|
|
through
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 22,
|
|
July 29,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
192,127
|
|
|
$
|
138,254
|
|
|
$
|
304,743
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
$
|
39,304
|
|
|
$
|
55,762
|
|
|
$
|
77,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
17,887
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
25,351
|
|
|
|
(18,250
|
)
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
8,662
|
|
|
|
16,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
16,998
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
15,196
|
|
|
|
(17,588
|
)
|
|
|
(5,556
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
Successor at
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,967,473
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,208,487
|
|
|
$
|
135,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,384,574
|
|
|
|
786,693
|
|
|
|
603,676
|
|
|
|
75,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
574,088
|
|
|
|
567,665
|
|
|
|
596,296
|
|
|
|
(4,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
IMTT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
120,937
|
|
|
$
|
110,717
|
|
|
$
|
250,624
|
|
|
$
|
210,667
|
|
|
$
|
193,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
20,761
|
|
|
|
47,146
|
|
|
|
35,817
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,614
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
13,376
|
|
|
|
7,881
|
|
|
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
630,666
|
|
|
$
|
549,235
|
|
|
$
|
510,554
|
|
|
$
|
487,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
425,454
|
|
|
|
468,114
|
|
|
|
445,524
|
|
|
|
424,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
205,212
|
|
|
|
81,121
|
|
|
|
65,030
|
|
|
|
62,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Gas
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
July 1, 2005
|
|
Year
|
|
August 8, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
Ended
|
|
Through
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
April 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
82,568
|
|
|
$
|
70,907
|
|
|
$
|
129,935
|
|
|
$
|
132,413
|
|
|
$
|
104,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
17,885
|
|
|
|
19,640
|
|
|
|
18,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes(1)
|
|
|
7,474
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
5,792
|
|
|
|
10,815
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
At April 30,
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
319,277
|
|
|
$
|
188,774
|
|
|
$
|
175,075
|
|
|
$
|
158,957
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
207,628
|
|
|
|
105,913
|
|
|
|
100,236
|
|
|
|
92,638
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
111,649
|
|
|
|
82,783
|
|
|
|
74,769
|
|
|
|
66,263
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Gain on transfer of swaps of
$6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
has been excluded from income before taxes in the above table,
since this amount was eliminated on consolidation at the MIC
level.
|
S-13
RISK
FACTORS
We urge you to carefully read the risks described below and
beginning on page 4 of the accompanying prospectus and in
Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our amended
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement, as well as the other information we have
provided in this prospectus supplement, the accompanying
prospectus and the documents we incorporate by reference, before
reaching a decision regarding an investment in the shares.
An investment in shares of trust stock involves a number of
risks. Any of these risks could result in a significant or
material adverse effect on our results of operations or
financial condition and a corresponding decline in the market
price of the shares.
Risks
Related to Our New Businesses
TGC
relies on its synthetic natural gas, or SNG, plant, including
its transmission pipeline, for a significant portion of its
sales. Disruptions at that facility could adversely affect
TGCs ability to serve customers.
Disruptions at the SNG plant resulting from mechanical or
operational problems could affect TGCs ability to produce
SNG. Most of the regulated sales on Oahu are of SNG and are
produced at this plant. Disruptions to the primary and redundant
production systems would have a significant adverse effect on
sales and cash flows.
TGC
depends heavily on the two Oahu oil refineries for liquefied
petroleum gas and the primary feedstock for its SNG plant.
Disruptions at either of those refineries may adversely affect
TGCs operations.
TGCs business comprises the manufacture of SNG and the
distribution of SNG and liquified petroleum gas, or LPG. Any
feedstock, SNG or LPG supply disruptions that limit its ability
to manufacture and deliver gas for customers would adversely
affect its ability to carry out its operating activities. These
could include: an inability to renew feedstock purchase
arrangements, including our current SNG feedstock agreement
which is due for renewal in 2007; extended unavailability of one
or both of the Oahu refineries; a disruption to crude oil
supplies or feedstocks to Hawaii; or an inability to purchase
LPG from foreign sources. Specifically, TGC is limited in its
ability to store both foreign-sourced LPG and domestic LPG at
the same location at the same time and, therefore, any
disruption in supply may cause a short-term depletion of LPG.
All supply disruptions, if occurring for an extended period,
could materially adversely impact TGCs sales and cash
flows.
TGCs
most significant costs are locally-sourced LPG, LPG imports and
feedstock for the SNG plant, the costs of which are directly
related to petroleum prices. To the extent that these costs
cannot be passed on to customers, TGCs sales and cash
flows will be adversely affected.
The profitability of TGC is based on the margin of sales prices
over costs. Since LPG and feedstock for the SNG plant are
commodities, changes in the market for these products can have a
significant impact on costs. In addition, increased reliance on
higher-priced foreign sources of LPG, whether due to disruptions
or shortages in local sources or otherwise, could also have a
significant impact on costs. TGC has no control over these
costs, and, to the extent that these costs cannot be passed on
to customers, TGCs financial condition and the results of
operations would be adversely affected. Higher prices could
result in reduced customer demand or could result in customer
conversion to alternative energy sources. This would reduce
sales volume and adversely affect profits.
TGCs
operations on the islands of Hawaii, Maui and Kauai rely on LPG
that is transported to those islands by Jones Act qualified
barges from Oahu and from non-Jones Act vessels from foreign
ports. Disruptions to those vessels could adversely affect
TGCs results of operations.
TGC has time charter agreements allowing the use of two barges
that have the capability of transporting 424,000 gallons and
657,000 gallons of LPG, respectively. The Jones Act requires
that vessels carrying cargo between two U.S. ports meet
certain requirements. The barges used by TGC are the only two
Jones Act qualified barges capable of carrying large volumes of
LPG that are available in the Hawaiian Islands. They are near
the end of their useful economic lives, and TGC intends to
replace one or both of them
S-14
in the near future. To the extent that TGC is unable to replace
these barges, or alternatively, these barges are unable to
transport LPG from Oahu and TGC is not able to secure
foreign-source LPG or obtain an exemption to the Jones Act, the
storage capacity on those islands could be depleted and sales
and cash flows could be adversely affected.
The
recovery of amounts expended for capital projects and operating
expenses in the regulated operations is subject to approval by
the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission, or HPUC, which exposes
TGC to the risk of incurring costs that may not be recoverable
from regulated customers.
In the past, TGC has requested rate increases from the HPUC
approximately every five years as its operating costs increased
and as capital investments were committed. When the HPUC
approved MICs purchase of TGC, it stipulated that no rate
increase may be implemented until 2009. Should TGC seek a rate
increase, there is a risk that TGC will not be granted such
increase or that it will be permitted only part of the increase,
which may have a material adverse effect on TGCs financial
condition and results of operations.
The
non-regulated operations of TGC are subject to a variety of
competitive pressures and the actions of competitors,
particularly from other energy sources, could have a materially
adverse effect on operating results.
In Hawaii, gas is largely used by commercial and residential
customers for water heating and cooking. TGC also has wholesale
customers that resell product to other end-users. Gas end-use
applications may be substituted by other fuel sources such as
electricity, diesel, solar and wind. Customers could, for a
number of reasons, including increased gas prices, lower costs
of alternative energy or convenience, meet their energy needs
through alternative sources. This could have an adverse effect
on TGCs sales, revenue and cash flows.
Approximately
two-thirds of TGCs employees are members of a labor union.
A work interruption may adversely affect TGCs
business.
Approximately two-thirds of TGCs employees are covered
under a collective bargaining agreement that expires on
April 30, 2008. Labor disruptions related to that contract
or to other disputes could affect the SNG plant, distributions
systems and customer services. We are unable to predict how work
stoppages would affect the business.
TGCs
operating results are affected by Hawaiis
economy.
The primary driver of Hawaiis economy is tourism. A
significant portion of TGCs sales is generated from
businesses that rely on tourism as their primary source of
revenue. These businesses include hotels and resorts,
restaurants and laundries, comprising approximately 40% of
sales. Should tourism decline significantly, TGCs
commercial sales could be affected adversely.
In addition, a reduction in new housing starts and commercial
development would limit growth opportunities for TGCs
business.
TGC
has certain environmental risks.
TGC is subject to risks and hazards associated with the
refining, handling, storage and transportation of combustible
products. These risks could result in substantial losses due to
personal injury, loss of life, damage or destruction of property
and equipment, and environmental damage. Losses could be greater
than insurance levels maintained by TGC, which could have an
adverse effect on TGCs financial results. In addition,
disruptions to physical assets could reduce TGCs ability
to serve customers and adversely affect sales and cash flows.
Because
of its geographic location, Hawaii, and in turn TGC, is subject
to earthquakes and certain weather risks that could materially
disrupt operations.
Hawaii is subject to earthquakes and certain weather risks, such
as hurricanes, floods, heavy and sustained rains and tidal
waves. Because TGCs SNG plant, SNG transmission line and
several storage facilities are close to the ocean,
weather-related disruptions are possible. In addition,
earthquakes may cause disruptions. These events could damage
TGCs assets or could result in wide-spread damage to
TGCs
S-15
customers, thereby reducing sales volumes and, to the extent
such damages are not covered by insurance, TGCs revenue
and cash flows.
TGC
may face a greater exposure to terrorism than other businesses
because of the nature of its products.
Because of the combustible nature of TGCs products and
consumer reliance on these products for basic services,
TGCs SNG plant, transmission pipelines, barges and storage
facilities may be at greater risk for terrorism attacks than
other businesses. Such attacks could affect TGCs
operations significantly.
TGCs
income may be affected adversely if additional compliance costs
are required as a result of new safety, health or environmental
regulation.
TGC is subject to federal, state and local safety, health and
environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations
affect all aspects of TGCs operations and are frequently
modified. There is a risk that TGC may not be able to comply
with some aspect of these laws and regulations, resulting in
fines or penalties. Additionally, if new laws and regulations
are adopted or if interpretations of existing laws and
regulations change, TGC could be required to increase capital
spending and incur increased operating expenses in order to
comply. Because the regulatory environment frequently changes,
TGC cannot predict when or how it may be affected by such
changes.
IMTTs
business is dependent on the demand for bulk liquid storage
capacity in the locations where it operates.
Demand for IMTTs bulk liquid storage is largely a function
of U.S. domestic demand for chemical, petroleum and
vegetable and animal, or V&A, oil products and, less
significantly, the extent to which such products are imported
into the United States rather than produced domestically.
U.S. domestic demand for chemical, petroleum and V&A
products is influenced by a number of factors, including
economic conditions, growth in the U.S. economy and the
pricing of chemical, petroleum and V&A products and their
substitutes. Import volumes of these products to the United
States are influenced by the cost of producing chemical,
petroleum and V&A products domestically vis-à-vis
overseas and the cost of transporting the products from
overseas. In addition, changes in government regulations that
affect imports of bulk chemical, petroleum and V&A products,
including the imposition of surcharges or taxes on imported
products, could adversely affect import volumes. A reduction in
demand for bulk liquid storage, particularly in the New York
Harbor or the lower Mississippi River, as a consequence of lower
U.S. domestic demand for, or imports of, chemical,
petroleum or V&A products, could lead to a decline in
storage rates and tankage volumes rented by IMTT and adversely
affect IMTTs revenues and profitability.
IMTTs
business could be adversely affected by a substantial increase
in bulk liquid storage capacity in the locations where it
operates.
An increase in available tank storage capacity in excess of
growth in demand for such storage in the key locations in which
IMTT operates, such as New York Harbor and the lower Mississippi
River, could result in overcapacity and a decline in storage
rates and tankage volumes rented and could adversely affect
IMTTs revenues and profitability.
IMTT
is subject to environmental, health and safety risks that may
impact its future cash flows and profitability.
A number of the properties owned by IMTT have been subject to
environmental contamination in the past and require remediation
for which IMTT is liable. These remediation obligations exist
principally at IMTTs Bayonne and Lemont facilities and
could cost more than anticipated or could be incurred earlier
than anticipated or both. In addition, IMTT may discover
additional environmental contamination at its Bayonne, Lemont or
other facilities which may require remediation at significant
cost to IMTT. Further, the past contamination of the properties
owned by IMTT could also result in personal injury or property
damage or similar claims by third parties.
IMTTs operations are subject to numerous statutes, rules
and regulations relating to environmental, health and safety
protection that are complex, stringent and expensive to comply
with. Although we believe that IMTTs operations comply in
all material respects with environmental, health and safety
regulations,
S-16
failure to comply in the future may give rise to interruptions
in IMTTs operations and civil or criminal penalties and
liabilities that could adversely affect IMTTs business and
financial condition. Further, these rules and regulations are
subject to change and compliance with such changes could result
in a restriction of IMTTs business activities, significant
capital expenditures
and/or
increased ongoing operating costs.
IMTTs
current debt facilities will need to be refinanced on amended
terms and increased in size during 2006 and 2007 to provide the
funding necessary for IMTT to fully pursue its expansion plans.
The inability to refinance this debt on acceptable terms and to
borrow additional amounts would have a material adverse effect
on the business. Additionally, if interest rates or margins
increase, the cost of servicing any refinancing debt will
increase, reducing IMTTs profitability and its ability to
pay dividends to us.
IMTTs current debt facilities will need to be refinanced
on amended terms and increased in size during 2006 and 2007 to
provide the funding necessary for IMTT to fully pursue its
expansion plans. We cannot assure you that IMTT will be able to
refinance its debt facilities on acceptable terms, including the
loosening of certain restrictive covenants, or that IMTT will be
able to expand the size of its debt facilities by an amount
sufficient to cover the funding requirements of its expansion
plans. If IMTT is unable to obtain sufficient additional
financing, it will be unable to fully pursue its current
expansion plans, its growth prospects and results of operations
would be adversely affected and its distributions to us would
decline from current levels. This would adversely affect our
ability to make distributions to shareholders. Additionally,
even if available, replacement debt facilities may only be
available at substantially higher interest rates or margins or
with substantially more restrictive covenants. Either event may
limit the operational flexibility of IMTT and its ability to
upstream dividends and distributions to us. If interest rates or
margins increase, IMTT will pay higher rates of interest on any
debt that it raises to refinance existing debt, thereby reducing
its profitability and having an adverse impact on its ability to
pay dividends to us and our ability to make distributions to
shareholders.
IMTTs
business involves hazardous activities, is partly located in a
region with a history of significant adverse weather events and
is potentially a target for terrorist attacks. We cannot assure
you that IMTT is, or will be in the future, adequately insured
against all such risks.
The transportation, handling and storage of petroleum, chemical
and V&A products are subject to the risk of spills, leakage,
contamination, fires and explosions. Any of these events may
result in loss of revenue, loss of reputation or goodwill,
fines, penalties and other liabilities. In certain
circumstances, such events could also require IMTT to halt or
significantly alter operations at all or part of the facility at
which the event occurred. Consistent with industry practice,
IMTT carries insurance to protect against most of the
accident-related risks involved in the conduct of the business;
however, the limits of IMTTs coverage mean IMTT cannot
insure against all risks. In addition, because IMTTs
facilities are not insured against loss from terrorism, a
terrorist attack that significantly damages one or more of
IMTTs major facilities would have a negative impact on
IMTTs future cash flow and profitability. Further, losses
sustained by insurers during hurricanes Katrina and Rita may
result in lower insurance coverage and increased insurance
premiums for IMTTs properties in Louisiana going forward,
a situation that could worsen if future weather events cause
significant property damage in the U.S. Gulf region.
Hurricane
Katrina resulted in labor and materials shortages in the regions
affected. This may have a negative impact on the cost and
construction timeline of IMTTs new storage facility in
Louisiana, which could result in a loss of customer contracts
and reduced revenues and profitability.
In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, construction costs in the
region affected by the hurricane have increased and labor
shortages have been experienced. This could have a significant
negative impact on the cost and construction schedule of
IMTTs new storage facility at Geismar in Louisiana. IMTT
may not be fully compensated by customers for any such increase
in construction costs. In addition, substantial construction
delays could result in a loss of customer contracts with no
compensation or inadequate compensation, which would have a
material adverse effect on IMTTs future cash flows and
profitability.
S-17
Risks
Related to Our Business
For a detailed discussion of the additional risks related to our
business, please see Risk Factors Risks
Related to Our Business in Part I, Item 1A of
our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, which is incorporated by reference
in this prospectus supplement.
We
have only operated as a combined company since December 2004,
during which time we have devoted significant resources to
integrating our businesses, thereby diverting attention from
strategic initiatives.
We completed our initial public offering and the acquisition of
our initial businesses and investments in December 2004 and
completed additional acquisitions for our airport services
business and airport parking business during 2005. On
May 1, 2006, we completed the acquisition of our 50%
ownership interest in IMTTs bulk liquid storage business.
On June 7, 2006, we completed the acquisition of TGC, our
gas production and distribution business in Hawaii. On
July 11, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Trajen. With
the exception of our district energy business, prior to our
acquisition all of our businesses were privately owned and not
subject to financial and disclosure requirements and controls
applicable to U.S. public companies. We have expended
significant time and resources throughout our operations to
develop and implement effective systems and procedures,
including accounting and financial reporting systems, in order
to manage our operations on a combined basis as a consolidated
U.S. public company. As a result, these businesses have
been limited, and may continue to be limited, in their ability
to pursue strategic operating initiatives and achieve our
internal growth expectations. In addition, due to our short
operating history as a consolidated U.S. public company,
the performance of our consolidated business during its first
year of operations may not be an accurate indicator of our
prospects for future years.
Our
businesses have substantial indebtedness, which could inhibit
their operating flexibility.
As of June 30, 2006, on a consolidated basis, we had total
long-term debt outstanding of $1,046.9 million, including
$274.0 million outstanding under MIC Inc.s
acquisition credit facility. The amount outstanding under MIC
Inc.s acquisition credit facility and the amount
outstanding under the NACH credit facility both increased by
$180.0 million in the third quarter of 2006 to finance the
Trajen acquisition. We repaid $76.45 million of outstanding
borrowings under the MIC Inc. the acquisition credit facility
with proceeds from the sale of our investment in MCG and a
further $89.5 million of outstanding borrowings under the
MIC Inc. acquisition credit facility with proceeds from the sale
of our investment in SEW. After giving effect to this offering
and the application of the net proceeds of the offering as
described in Use of Proceeds, we will have
consolidated total
long-term
debt outstanding of approximately $1,023.3 million,
$72.6 million of which will be at the MIC Inc. level.
This will be further reduced by the application of the net
proceeds from the sale of our interest in YLL to repay in full
the outstanding borrowings under MIC Inc.s
acquisition credit facility, which we expect will occur by the
end of February 2007. The terms of our businesses debt
generally require our businesses to comply with significant
operating and financial covenants. The ability of each of our
businesses to meet their respective debt service obligations and
to repay their outstanding indebtedness will depend primarily
upon cash produced by that business.
This indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting the payment of dividends and distributions to us;
|
|
|
|
increasing the risk that our subsidiaries might not generate
sufficient cash to service their indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas
of our businesses because our subsidiaries must dedicate a
substantial portion of their operating cash flow to service
their debt;
|
|
|
|
limiting our and our subsidiaries ability to borrow
additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures,
debt services requirements, execution of our internal growth
strategy, acquisitions or other purposes; and
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and
to react to competitive pressures or adverse changes in
government regulation.
|
If we are unable to comply with the terms of any of our various
debt agreements, we may be required to refinance a portion or
all of the related debt or obtain additional financing. We may
be unable to refinance or obtain additional financing because of
our high levels of debt and debt incurrence restrictions under
our debt agreements. We also may be forced to default on any of
our various debt obligations if cash flow from the relevant
operating business is insufficient and refinancing or additional
financing is unavailable, and, as a result, the relevant debt
holders may accelerate the maturity of their obligations.
Our
Managers affiliation with Macquarie Bank Limited and the
Macquarie Group may result in conflicts of
interest.
Our Manager is an affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited and a
member of the Macquarie Group. From time to time, we have
entered into, and in the future we may enter into, transactions
and relationships involving Macquarie Bank Limited, its
affiliates, or other members of the Macquarie Group. Such
transactions have included and may include, among other things,
the acquisition of businesses and investments from Macquarie
Group members, the entry into debt facilities and derivative
instruments with Macquarie Bank Limited serving as lender or
counterparty, and financial advisory services provided to us by
Macquarie Securities (USA) Inc. and other affiliates of
Macquarie Bank Limited.
Although our audit committee, all of the members of which are
independent directors, is required to approve of any related
party transactions, including those involving Macquarie Bank
Limited, its affiliates, or members of the Macquarie Group, the
relationship of our Manager to Macquarie Bank Limited and the
Macquarie Group may result in conflicts of interest.
S-19
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $215.5 million (or approximately
$247.2 million if the underwriters overallotment
option is exercised in full) after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses of
this offering. We intend to use the net proceeds from this
offering, in addition to the net proceeds from our anticipated
disposition of our interest in YLL, to repay borrowings under
the acquisition credit facility of MIC Inc. incurred to finance
the acquisition of our interests in IMTT, Trajen and TGC. A
$1.00 change in the offering price per share would change our
expected net proceeds, and therefore, the amount of indebtedness
that we expect to repay, by approximately $7.2 million.
To fund acquisitions, capital expenditures and to a limited
extent working capital, we amended and restated our acquisition
credit agreement with Citicorp North America Inc. (as lender and
administrative agent), Citibank, N.A., Merrill Lynch Capital
Corporation, Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch and Macquarie
Bank Limited, pursuant to which they committed to provide, in
the aggregate, financing of up to $480.0 million,
consisting of a $300.0 million revolving credit facility
and a term loan of $180.0 million through March 31,
2008 (the acquisition credit facility). The interest
margin under the acquisition credit facility is LIBOR plus 2.00%
or a base rate plus 1.00%, increasing by 0.50% on
November 9, 2006 and again on May 9, 2007, up to a
maximum of 3.00% and 2.00%, respectively. The current margin on
outstanding borrowings is LIBOR plus 2.00%. Once the term loan
borrowings have been repaid in full or the term loan commitments
have otherwise terminated, the interest rate on the revolving
portion of the acquisition credit facility will decrease to
LIBOR plus 1.25% or the base rate plus 0.25%. Amounts borrowed
and repaid under the term loan portion of the acquisition credit
facility may not be reborrowed.
PRICE
RANGE OF SHARES OF TRUST STOCK
Our trust stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol MIC. On October 13, 2006, the last
reported sale price of our trust stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $30.43 per share. The following table sets forth,
for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of
shares of our trust stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
29.60
|
|
|
$
|
26.80
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
30.35
|
|
|
$
|
27.10
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
29.95
|
|
|
$
|
27.05
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
29.25
|
|
|
$
|
27.60
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
31.41
|
|
|
$
|
28.20
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
35.23
|
|
|
$
|
30.64
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
32.27
|
|
|
$
|
26.06
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
32.68
|
|
|
$
|
23.84
|
|
Fourth quarter (through
October 13, 2006)
|
|
$
|
31.85
|
|
|
$
|
30.18
|
|
S-20
DISTRIBUTION
POLICY
Our policy is to pay regular quarterly cash distributions on all
outstanding shares. Our distribution policy is based on the
predictable and stable cash flows of our businesses and
investments and our intention to pay out, as distributions to
our shareholders, the majority of our cash available for
distribution and not to retain significant cash balances in
excess of prudent reserves in our operating subsidiaries. If our
strategy is successful, we expect to maintain and increase the
level of our distributions to shareholders in the future.
The declaration and payment of any future distribution will be
subject to a decision of the companys board of directors,
which will include a majority of independent directors. The
companys board of directors will take into account such
matters as general business conditions, our financial condition,
results of operations, capital requirements and any contractual,
legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of
distributions by us to our shareholders or by our subsidiaries
to us, and any other factors that the board of directors deems
relevant. In particular, all of our businesses have substantial
debt commitments, which must be satisfied before any of them can
distribute dividends or make distributions to us. These factors
could affect our ability to continue to make distributions.
S-21
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our unaudited pro forma
capitalization, assuming no exercise of the underwriters
overallotment option, at the assumed public offering price of
$30.43 per share of trust stock and the application of the
estimated net proceeds of such sale (after deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and our offering
expenses). This table should be read in conjunction with
Use of Proceeds and our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in our amended Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, and in our amended Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, all of which are
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,843
|
|
|
$
|
34,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current
maturities
|
|
|
1,044,797
|
|
|
|
1,023,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,046,943
|
|
|
|
1,025,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust stock, no par value;
500,000,000 authorized; 34,712,165 shares issued and
outstanding as adjusted for the offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
574,088
|
|
|
|
789,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,621,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted reflects the application of the net proceeds of this
offering to repay outstanding debt as well as the repayment of
$165.9 million of our acquisition-related indebtedness with
the proceeds of our sale of our investments in MCG and SEW. As
adjusted also reflects the use of $3.0 million of cash and
the incurrence of $360.0 million of indebtedness to finance
the acquisition of Trajen, which was completed on July 11,
2006. As adjusted does not reflect the repayment of debt with
the anticipated proceeds of our announced disposition of YLL,
which will occur after the completion of this offering and will
be used to repay in full our currently outstanding
acquisition-related indebtedness. |
|
(2) |
|
Each share of trust stock represents one beneficial interest in
the trust. |
S-22
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data for Macquarie Infrastructure Company
Trust include the results of operations, cash flow and balance
sheet data of Atlantic Aviation FBO Inc. (formerly known as
North America Capital Holding Company), or Atlantic FBO Holdco,
which was deemed to be our predecessor. We have included the
results of operations and cash flow data of Atlantic FBO Holdco
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, for the
period from January 1, 2004 through July 29, 2004 and
for the period July 30, 2004 through December 22,
2004. The period from December 23, 2004 through
December 31, 2004 includes the results of operations and
cash flow data for our businesses and investments from
December 23, 2004 through December 31, 2004 and the
results of the company from April 13, 2004 through
December 31, 2004. The year ended December 31, 2005
includes the full year of results for our consolidated group,
with the results of businesses acquired during 2005 being
included from their dates of acquisition. We have included the
balance sheet data of Atlantic FBO Holdco at December 31,
2003, and our consolidated balance sheet data at
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005. The selected
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are
derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements for
such periods and dates, included in our amended Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, incorporated
by reference in this prospectus supplement, which, in the
opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the consolidated financial data. Our
historical results are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that may be expected in the future. You should
read the following information together with the information
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
included in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, and our amended Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, all of which
is incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
The selected financial data for IMTT as at and for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of IMTT Holdings, Inc.
(formerly known as Loving Enterprises, Inc.), incorporated in
this prospectus supplement by reference from our Current Report
on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on May 16, 2006. The selected financial
data for IMTT for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and as
at and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are derived
from the unaudited consolidated financial statements of IMTT
Holdings, Inc. We own 50% of IMTT and account for this business
under the equity method of accounting.
The selected financial data for TGC as of April 30, 2006
and for the period from July 1, 2005 to April 30,
2006, and as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the year
ended June 30, 2005 and the period from August 8, 2003
(date of inception) to June 30, 2004, are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of K-1 HGC Investment,
LLC and subsidiaries, incorporated in this prospectus supplement
by reference from our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on June 27, 2006. The selected financial
data for TGC for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and as
at and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements of TGC.
The selected financial data presented below represent the
historical financial information for IMTT and TGC and do not
reflect the accounting for these businesses upon completion of
the acquisitions and the operation of the businesses as a
consolidated entity. You should read this information with the
financial statements and related notes, the unaudited condensed
combined pro forma financial statements and related notes and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this prospectus supplement.
S-23
Macquarie
Infrastructure Company Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 23
|
|
|
July 30
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 22,
|
|
|
July 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share information)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from product sales
|
|
$
|
98,914
|
|
|
$
|
64,391
|
|
|
$
|
143,273
|
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
$
|
29,465
|
|
|
$
|
41,146
|
|
|
$
|
57,129
|
|
|
$
|
49,893
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
90,630
|
|
|
|
71,190
|
|
|
|
156,167
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
14,616
|
|
|
|
20,720
|
|
|
|
18,698
|
|
Financing and equipment lease income
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
192,127
|
|
|
|
138,254
|
|
|
|
304,743
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
39,304
|
|
|
|
55,762
|
|
|
|
77,849
|
|
|
|
68,591
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
(61,279
|
)
|
|
|
(36,803
|
)
|
|
|
(84,806
|
)
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
(16,599
|
)
|
|
|
(21,068
|
)
|
|
|
(27,003
|
)
|
|
|
(22,186
|
)
|
Cost of services(1)
|
|
|
(43,664
|
)
|
|
|
(36,566
|
)
|
|
|
(81,834
|
)
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(1,961
|
)
|
|
|
(1,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
87,184
|
|
|
|
64,885
|
|
|
|
138,103
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
21,856
|
|
|
|
33,266
|
|
|
|
48,885
|
|
|
|
44,498
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses(2)
|
|
|
(48,244
|
)
|
|
|
(38,286
|
)
|
|
|
(82,636
|
)
|
|
|
(7,953
|
)
|
|
|
(13,942
|
)
|
|
|
(22,378
|
)
|
|
|
(29,159
|
)
|
|
|
(27,795
|
)
|
Fees to manager
|
|
|
(10,196
|
)
|
|
|
(4,152
|
)
|
|
|
(9,294
|
)
|
|
|
(12,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
(3,831
|
)
|
|
|
(2,747
|
)
|
|
|
(6,007
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
(1,377
|
)
|
|
|
(2,126
|
)
|
|
|
(1,852
|
)
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
(7,026
|
)
|
|
|
(6,320
|
)
|
|
|
(14,815
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(2,329
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
17,887
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
25,351
|
|
|
|
(18,250
|
)
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
8,662
|
|
|
|
16,205
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
6,184
|
|
|
|
12,361
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(31,267
|
)
|
|
|
(15,269
|
)
|
|
|
(33,800
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
|
|
(4,655
|
)
|
|
|
(4,820
|
)
|
|
|
(5,351
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) and
amortization charges of investee
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
3,685
|
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(5,135
|
)
|
|
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income tax
|
|
|
20,161
|
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
|
|
(17,572
|
)
|
|
|
(5,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|
|
10,237
|
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(3,011
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
3,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
(4,192
|
)
|
|
|
(3,150
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
16,998
|
|
|
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
15,196
|
|
|
|
(17,588
|
)
|
|
|
(5,556
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations of
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(11,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) on disposal of
discontinued operations (net of applicable income tax provisions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
(11,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,587
|
|
|
$
|
15,196
|
|
|
$
|
(17,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(355
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,731
|
|
|
$
|
(6,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss)
per share(3)
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
(17.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 23
|
|
|
July 30
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 22,
|
|
|
July 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share information)
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$
|
23,401
|
|
|
$
|
20,744
|
|
|
$
|
43,547
|
|
|
$
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
(577
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,757
|
|
|
$
|
9,811
|
|
|
$
|
9,608
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(506,545
|
)
|
|
|
(51,650
|
)
|
|
|
(201,950
|
)
|
|
|
(467,477
|
)
|
|
|
(228,145
|
)
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
|
|
(4,648
|
)
|
|
|
(2,787
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
405,457
|
|
|
|
11,235
|
|
|
|
133,847
|
|
|
|
611,765
|
|
|
|
231,843
|
|
|
|
(5,741
|
)
|
|
|
(5,956
|
)
|
|
|
(5,012
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
$
|
(77,320
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
140,050
|
|
|
$
|
3,121
|
|
|
$
|
5,027
|
|
|
$
|
(793
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes depreciation expense of $4.5 million,
$3.8 million, $8.1 million and $195,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, the six months ended
June 30, 2005, the year ended December 31, 2005 and
the period December 23, 2004 through December 31,
2004, respectively, relating to our airport parking and district
energy businesses. |
|
(2) |
|
We incurred $6.0 million of non-recurring acquisition and
formation costs that have been included in the December 23,
2004 to December 31, 2004 consolidated results of
operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share was computed on a
weighted average basis for the six months ended June 30,
2006, the six months ended June 30, 2005, the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the period April 13, 2004
(inception) through December 31, 2004. The effect of
potentially dilutive shares for these periods is calculated by
assuming that the restricted stock unit grants issued to our
independent directors on December 21, 2004 (which vested on
May 25, 2005), May 25, 2005 (which vested on
May 25, 2006) and May 25, 2006 (which vest in
2007), had been fully converted to shares on the dates the
restricted stock unit grants were issued. The stock unit grants
issued to our independent directors on December 21, 2004
were anti-dilutive in 2004 due to our net loss for that period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor at
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
124,955
|
|
|
$
|
156,676
|
|
|
$
|
167,769
|
|
|
$
|
10,108
|
|
Property, equipment, land and
leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
461,314
|
|
|
|
335,119
|
|
|
|
284,744
|
|
|
|
36,963
|
|
Contract rights and other
intangibles, net
|
|
|
308,461
|
|
|
|
299,487
|
|
|
|
254,530
|
|
|
|
52,524
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
402,143
|
|
|
|
281,776
|
|
|
|
217,576
|
|
|
|
33,222
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,967,473
|
|
|
|
1,363,298
|
|
|
|
1,208,487
|
|
|
|
135,210
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
61,226
|
|
|
|
34,598
|
|
|
|
39,525
|
|
|
|
15,271
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
228,933
|
|
|
|
113,794
|
|
|
|
123,429
|
|
|
|
22,866
|
|
Long-term debt, including related
party, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,044,797
|
|
|
|
629,095
|
|
|
|
434,352
|
|
|
|
32,777
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,384,574
|
|
|
|
786,693
|
|
|
|
603,676
|
|
|
|
75,369
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,099
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
574,088
|
|
|
|
567,665
|
|
|
|
596,296
|
|
|
|
(4,258
|
)
|
S-25
IMTT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue
|
|
$
|
94,332
|
|
|
$
|
88,584
|
|
|
$
|
182,518
|
|
|
$
|
168,384
|
|
|
$
|
159,339
|
|
Terminal revenue
heating
|
|
|
10,542
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
20,595
|
|
|
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
12,493
|
|
Environmental response revenue
|
|
|
10,006
|
|
|
|
5,904
|
|
|
|
37,107
|
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
Nursery revenue
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
10,404
|
|
|
|
10,907
|
|
|
|
10,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
120,937
|
|
|
|
110,717
|
|
|
|
250,624
|
|
|
|
210,667
|
|
|
|
193,066
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal operating costs
|
|
|
(48,731
|
)
|
|
|
(45,867
|
)
|
|
|
(97,746
|
)
|
|
|
(87,755
|
)
|
|
|
(78,172
|
)
|
Terminal operating
costs fuel
|
|
|
(9,435
|
)
|
|
|
(9,505
|
)
|
|
|
(20,969
|
)
|
|
|
(17,712
|
)
|
|
|
(15,013
|
)
|
Environmental response operating
costs
|
|
|
(5,954
|
)
|
|
|
(4,541
|
)
|
|
|
(24,774
|
)
|
|
|
(9,720
|
)
|
|
|
(9,172
|
)
|
Nursery operating costs
|
|
|
(6,272
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
(10,268
|
)
|
|
|
(11,136
|
)
|
|
|
(11,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
70,392
|
|
|
|
66,216
|
|
|
|
153,757
|
|
|
|
126,323
|
|
|
|
113,748
|
|
Terminal gross profit
|
|
|
46,708
|
|
|
|
42,588
|
|
|
|
84,398
|
|
|
|
78,169
|
|
|
|
78,647
|
|
Environmental response gross profit
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
12,333
|
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
Nursery gross profit
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
50,545
|
|
|
|
44,501
|
|
|
|
96,867
|
|
|
|
84,344
|
|
|
|
79,318
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(10,866
|
)
|
|
|
(10,213
|
)
|
|
|
(22,834
|
)
|
|
|
(20,911
|
)
|
|
|
(20,823
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(15,165
|
)
|
|
|
(14,767
|
)
|
|
|
(29,524
|
)
|
|
|
(29,929
|
)
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
Mark-to-market
gain on non-hedging derivatives
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
20,761
|
|
|
|
47,146
|
|
|
|
35,817
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,400
|
)
|
|
|
(11,334
|
)
|
|
|
(22,100
|
)
|
|
|
(22,269
|
)
|
|
|
(21,671
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(6,486
|
)
|
|
|
(4,294
|
)
|
|
|
(11,670
|
)
|
|
|
(5,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,851
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,614
|
|
|
$
|
5,133
|
|
|
$
|
13,376
|
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
$
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
38,799
|
|
|
$
|
26,134
|
|
|
$
|
51,706
|
|
|
$
|
40,713
|
|
|
$
|
33,246
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(33,512
|
)
|
|
|
(14,050
|
)
|
|
|
(37,090
|
)
|
|
|
(51,033
|
)
|
|
|
(42,559
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
87,646
|
|
|
|
(11,198
|
)
|
|
|
(13,460
|
)
|
|
|
10,174
|
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
Effect of exchange rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
$
|
92,933
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
(146
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
131,577
|
|
|
$
|
59,798
|
|
|
$
|
38,809
|
|
|
$
|
30,511
|
|
Property, equipment, land and
leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
477,199
|
|
|
|
458,355
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
429,091
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
630,666
|
|
|
|
549,235
|
|
|
|
510,554
|
|
|
|
487,021
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
48,719
|
|
|
|
47,993
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
25,196
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
82,431
|
|
|
|
75,791
|
|
|
|
60,718
|
|
|
|
50,880
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
268,075
|
|
|
|
316,310
|
|
|
|
320,375
|
|
|
|
307,008
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
425,454
|
|
|
|
468,114
|
|
|
|
445,524
|
|
|
|
424,759
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
205,212
|
|
|
|
81,121
|
|
|
|
65,030
|
|
|
|
62,262
|
|
The Gas
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
July 1, 2005
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
August 8, 2003
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share information)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
82,568
|
|
|
$
|
70,907
|
|
|
$
|
129,935
|
|
|
$
|
132,413
|
|
|
$
|
104,883
|
|
Generation and purchased gas
|
|
|
(46,568
|
)
|
|
|
(37,402
|
)
|
|
|
(71,290
|
)
|
|
|
(67,493
|
)
|
|
|
(46,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
33,505
|
|
|
|
58,645
|
|
|
|
64,920
|
|
|
|
58,429
|
|
Operating and maintenance expenses
|
|
|
(9,101
|
)
|
|
|
(8,414
|
)
|
|
|
(14,765
|
)
|
|
|
(16,273
|
)
|
|
|
(14,536
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,573
|
)
|
|
|
(4,473
|
)
|
|
|
(5,074
|
)
|
|
|
(4,472
|
)
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
(7,816
|
)
|
|
|
(7,503
|
)
|
|
|
(13,662
|
)
|
|
|
(16,018
|
)
|
|
|
(14,200
|
)
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
(4,932
|
)
|
|
|
(4,223
|
)
|
|
|
(7,860
|
)
|
|
|
(7,915
|
)
|
|
|
(6,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
17,885
|
|
|
|
19,640
|
|
|
|
18,730
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3,960
|
)
|
|
|
(1,883
|
)
|
|
|
(3,857
|
)
|
|
|
(3,484
|
)
|
|
|
(2,609
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,180
|
)
|
|
|
(3,986
|
)
|
|
|
(5,526
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(6,390
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of prior period
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,384
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
3,380
|
|
|
$
|
6,386
|
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
10,815
|
|
|
$
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
11,211
|
|
|
$
|
11,618
|
|
|
$
|
13,804
|
|
|
$
|
17,222
|
|
|
$
|
19,932
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(260,207
|
)
|
|
|
(3,376
|
)
|
|
|
(17,084
|
)
|
|
|
(6,116
|
)
|
|
|
(112,480
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
255,450
|
|
|
|
(3,153
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
98,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$
|
6,454
|
|
|
$
|
5,089
|
|
|
$
|
(3,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,101
|
|
|
$
|
5,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gain on transfer of swaps of $6.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 has been excluded from net
income in the above table, since this amount was eliminated on
consolidation at the MIC level. |
S-27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
39,994
|
|
|
$
|
42,393
|
|
|
$
|
41,374
|
|
|
$
|
26,588
|
|
Property, equipment, land and
leasehold improvements, net
|
|
|
128,001
|
|
|
|
121,810
|
|
|
|
119,139
|
|
|
|
117,638
|
|
Contract rights and other
intangibles, net
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
120,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
319,277
|
|
|
|
188,774
|
|
|
|
175,075
|
|
|
|
158,957
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
18,669
|
|
|
|
14,471
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
12,844
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
8,103
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
72,593
|
|
|
|
72,593
|
|
|
|
72,593
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
207,628
|
|
|
|
105,913
|
|
|
|
100,236
|
|
|
|
92,638
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
111,649
|
|
|
|
82,783
|
|
|
|
74,769
|
|
|
|
66,263
|
|
S-28
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the financial condition and results
of operations of the company should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those
statements included elsewhere herein. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties
and are made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates, and similar
expressions identify such forward-looking statements. Our actual
results and timing of certain events could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those
set forth under Risk Factors beginning on
page S-14 of this prospectus supplement. Unless required by
law, we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking
statements. Readers should also carefully review the risk
factors set forth in other reports and documents filed from time
to time with the SEC.
For a detailed discussion of our operating segments and
businesses and our results of operations, please see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Operating
Segments and Businesses and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations in our
amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Results of Operations and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Business Segment
Operations in our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Results of
Operations in our Current Reports on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on May 16, 2006 and June 27, 2006,
all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
General
The trust is a Delaware statutory trust that was formed on
April 13, 2004. The company is a Delaware limited liability
company that was also formed on April 13, 2004. The trust
is the sole holder of 100% of the LLC interests of the company.
Prior to December 21, 2004, the trust was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Macquarie Infrastructure Management (USA) Inc., or
MIMUSA.
We own, operate and invest in a diversified group of
infrastructure businesses, which are businesses that provide
basic, everyday services, such as parking and gas production and
distribution, through long-lived physical assets. These
infrastructure businesses generally operate in sectors where
demand exceeds supply and high barriers to entry exist. As a
result, they have sustainable and growing long-term cash flows.
We operate and finance our businesses in a manner that maximizes
these cash flows.
We are dependent upon cash distributions from our businesses to
meet our corporate overhead and management fee expenses and to
pay dividends. We receive dividends from our airport services
business, airport parking business, district energy business,
gas production and distribution business and bulk liquid storage
terminal business through our directly owned holding company MIC
Inc.
Distributions received from our businesses, net of taxes, are
available first to meet management fees and corporate overhead
expenses then to fund dividend payments by the company to the
trust for payment to holders of trust stock. Base and
performance management fees payable to our Manager are allocated
between the company and the directly owned subsidiaries based on
the companys internal allocation policy.
Infrastructure businesses are generally insulated from the
impact of inflation by virtue of their ability to pass cost
increases through to customers. In addition, user
pays, contracted and regulated
infrastructure businesses have specific attributes that limit
their exposure to the negative effects of inflation. Regulatory
authorities determine the prices that a regulated infrastructure
business can charge for its services, typically on a
cost-plus or a reasonable
rate-of-return
basis. Typically, the amount approved by the regulatory
authority will apply for a number of years and may provide for
either inflationary changes or, as is the case for the regulated
operations of our gas production and distribution business, TGC,
an ability to adjust
S-29
customer billings for the actual amount of its largest and most
unpredictable cost components: liquefied petroleum gas and the
feedstock for its synthetic natural gas plant. The rates that
TGC charges its utility customers became effective in 2001. The
business may petition regulatory authorities for an increase in
its rates that, if approved, could become effective in 2009. TGC
has the ability to increase its standard price lists for
non-regulated customers at will.
Infrastructure businesses with contracted sources of revenue are
able to protect such revenues by employing contractual
provisions that require or permit price increases based on an
agreed upon indicator of inflation. For example, in our bulk
liquid storage terminal business, the per barrel rates for
storage under most of the customer contracts increase annually
on the basis of increases in various Consumer Price Indices
published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Given the largely fixed nature of the operating
expenses of this business, inflation of the revenue stream can
result in increased profitability.
Our user pays businesses derive revenue from per use
charges and generally attempt to pass increased costs through to
their customers. Our airport services and airport parking
businesses are examples. The primary sources of revenue are fuel
sales in the case of our airport services business and fees for
parking for our airport parking business. Subject to competitive
pressure in a given market, the prices charged for both fuel and
parking may be increased at rates comparable with the overall
rate of inflation since the relative size of the increase for
any one user is small. For example, based on the 20 year
average rate of inflation (CPI-U), the annual increase in an
average parking fee would have been approximately $1.25 in 2006
compared to 2005.
Summary
of Our Existing Businesses and Investments and Results of
Operations
Airport
Services Business
Our airport services business, Atlantic Aviation, operated FBOs
at 18 airports and one heliport throughout the United States
prior to our acquisition of Trajen on July 11, 2006. For a
discussion of our acquisition of Trajen, please refer to
Business Our New Businesses Trajen
Holdings, Inc. FBOs primarily provide fuelling and
fuel-related services, aircraft parking and hangarage to
owner/operators of jet aircraft in the general aviation sector
of the air transportation industry. The business also operates
six regional airports under management contracts, although
airport management constitutes a small portion of our airport
services business. Our airport services business had revenue and
operating income of $124.1 million and $20.6 million,
respectively, for the first six months of 2006. For fiscal 2005,
revenue and operating income of our airport services business
were $201.5 million and $28.3 million, respectively.
Total assets of our airport services business were
$523.1 million at June 30, 2006, $553.3 million
at December 31, 2005 and $410.3 million at
December 31, 2004. Revenues from our airport services
business comprised 64.6% of our total revenues in the first six
months of fiscal year 2006 and 66.1% of our total revenues in
fiscal year 2005.
General aviation, which includes corporate and leisure flying,
pilot training, helicopter, medivac and certain air freight
operations, is the largest segment of U.S. civil aviation
and represents the largest percentage of the active civil
aircraft fleet. General aviation does not include commercial air
carriers or military operations. In order to attract independent
operators to service general aviation aircraft, local airport
authorities grant FBO operators the right to sell fuel. Our
airport services business depends upon the level of general
aviation activity and jet fuel consumption for the largest
portion of its revenue.
Fuel revenue is a function of the volume sold at each location
and the average per gallon sale price. The average per gallon
sale price is a function of our cost of fuel plus, where
applicable, fees and taxes paid to airports or other local
authorities for each gallon sold, plus our margin. Our fuel
gross profit depends on the volume of fuel sold and the average
dollar-based margin earned per gallon. The dollar-based margin
charged to customers varies based on business considerations.
Dollar-based margins per gallon are generally insensitive to the
wholesale price of fuel with both increases and decreases in the
wholesale price of fuel generally passed through to customers,
subject to the level of price competition that exists at the
various FBOs.
We believe that our FBO business will continue to benefit from
the overall growth in the corporate jet market and the demand
for the services that our business offers. However, we believe
that our airport services
S-30
business is in a position to grow at rates in excess of the
industry as a result of our internal growth, marketing and
acquisition strategies.
Airport
Parking Business
Our airport parking business is the largest provider of
off-airport parking services in the United States, measured by
number of locations, with 30 facilities comprising over
40,000 parking spaces and over 360 acres near
20 major airports across the United States, including six
of the ten largest passenger airports. Our airport parking
business, operating generally under the names PCA,
Avistar or SunPark, provides customers
with 24-hour
secure parking close to airport terminals, as well as
transportation via shuttle bus to and from their vehicles and
the terminal. Operations are carried out on either owned or
leased land at locations near airports. Operations on owned land
or land on which our airport parking business has leases longer
in term than 20 years (including extension options) account
for a majority of our operating income. The airport parking
business had revenues and operating income of $38.0 million
and $6.9 million, respectively, for the first six months of
2006. For fiscal year 2005, revenues and operating income were
$59.8 million and $6.5 million, respectively. Total
assets of our airport parking business were $291.4 million
at June 30, 2006, $288.8 million at December 31,
2005 and $205.2 million at December 31, 2004. Revenues
from our airport parking business comprised 19.7% of our total
revenues in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 and 19.6%
of our total revenues in fiscal year 2005.
The revenues of our airport parking business include both
parking and non-parking components. Parking revenues, which
comprise the substantial majority of total revenues, are driven
by the volume of passengers using the airports at which the
business operates, its market share at each location and its
parking rates. We aim to grow our parking revenue by increasing
our market share at each location and increasing parking rates
taking into consideration local demand and competition.
We believe that we can grow our airport parking business by
focusing on achieving operating efficiencies and internal
growth, expanding marketing efforts and complementary
acquisitions.
District
Energy Business
Our district energy business consists of 100% of Thermal Chicago
and a 75% interest in Northwind Aladdin. We also own all of the
senior debt of Northwind Aladdin. The remaining 25% equity
interest in Northwind Aladdin is owned by Nevada Electric
Investment Company, an indirect subsidiary of Sierra Pacific
Resources. The district energy business had revenues and
operating income of $19.4 million and $4.1 million,
respectively, for the first six months of 2006. For fiscal 2005,
revenue and operating income were $43.4 million and
$9.4 million, respectively. Total assets of our district
energy business were $242.5 million at June 30, 2006,
$245.4 million at December 31, 2005 and
$254.0 million at December 31, 2004. Revenues from our
district energy business comprised 10% of our total revenues in
the first six months of fiscal year 2006 and 14.2% of our total
revenues in fiscal year 2005.
Thermal Chicago sells chilled water to approximately
100 customers in the downtown Chicago area under long-term
contracts. Pursuant to these contracts, Thermal Chicago receives
both capacity and consumption payments. Capacity payments
(cooling capacity revenue) are received irrespective of the
volume of chilled water used by a customer and these payments
generally increase in line with inflation. Capacity payments
constituted approximately 38% of Thermal Chicagos total
revenue in 2005.
Consumption payments (cooling consumption revenue) are a per
unit charge for the volume of chilled water used. Such payments
are higher in the summer months when the demand for chilled
water is at its highest and, as a consequence, approximately 80%
of consumption revenue is received in the second and third
quarter of each year. Consumption payments also fluctuate
moderately from year to year depending on weather conditions.
We believe that we can grow our district energy business
internally via capital expenditures that will expand the
capacity of the Thermal Chicago system. Including the capacity
resulting from the expansion of one of our cooling plants that
is currently underway, Thermal Chicago will have additional
saleable cooling
S-31
capacity of 11,400 tons. We have identified the likely
purchasers of this capacity and expect to have it contracted by
the end of 2007.
Disposal
of Investments
In August 2006, we sold our interest in MCG, in October 2006, we
sold our interest in SEW and we entered into an agreement
relating to the disposition of our interest in the Yorkshire
Link toll road in August 2006. Each had been a part of our
portfolio since our initial public offering.
The disposal of these assets is consistent with our strategy to
be the owner and operator of infrastructure businesses primarily
in the United States. Moreover, the prices at which we were able
to sell these assets generated substantial gains for our
investors. We will redeploy the proceeds of the sales, including
the gains, into our recently acquired businesses. We will do so
by using the proceeds to reduce our acquisition-related
indebtedness not otherwise being repaid from the proceeds of
this offering. The $76.45 million net proceeds from the
disposition of our interest in MCG and the $89.5 million
net proceeds from the sale of SEW were used to repay a portion
of the outstanding borrowings under the MIC Inc. acquisition
credit facility.
Toll Road
Business
On August 23, 2006, we entered into an agreement to sell
Macquarie Yorkshire Limited, the holding company for our 50%
interest in Connect
M1-A1
Limited, or CHL. CHL is the holder of the Yorkshire Link (U.K.)
toll road concession. On September 22, 2006, our 50% partner in
CHL exercised their
pre-emptive
rights over our interest. The sale will be made to our partner
on the same terms as set forth in the prior agreement. We will
receive gross proceeds of GBP 43.6 million, increasing by
GBP 7,000 per day from September 30, 2006 until closing,
net of transaction costs. We have entered into a foreign
exchange rate hedge that will result in the conversion of the
proceeds into approximately $81.3 million, without taking
the per diem increase into account, upon closing of the
transaction. We expect the transaction to close by the end of
February 2007, and we are entitled to receive dividend and
interest payments from CHL for all periods ending on or prior to
September 30, 2006. Completion of the sale is subject to
customary third party approvals.
Investment
in MCG
On August 17, 2006, we completed the sale of all of our
16,517,413 stapled securities of MCG. We sold the stapled
securities into the public market at a price of AUD
6.10 per share generating gross proceeds of AUD
100.8 million. Following settlement of the trade on
August 23, 2006, we converted the AUD proceeds into
$76.45 million and used the proceeds to repay a portion of
the outstanding borrowings under the MIC Inc. acquisition
credit facility.
Investment
in SEW
On October 2, 2006, through our wholly owned subsidiary
South East Water LLC, we entered into an irrevocable undertaking
with HDF (UK) Holdings Limited pursuant to which we sold our
17.5% minority interest in the holding company for SEW. The
disposal was made pursuant to the exercise by MEIF Luxembourg
Holdings SA, or MLH, an affiliate of our Manager, of its drag
along rights under the SEW shareholders agreement and as a
part of a sale by MLH and the other shareholders of all of their
respective interests in SEW.
We received dividend and interest payments totaling
approximately $3.4 million from SEW for the six-month
period ended September 30, 2006 on September 29, 2006.
We received net proceeds on the sale of approximately
$89.5 million, representing our pro rata share of the total
consideration less our pro rata share of expenses, which we used
to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the MIC
Inc. acquisition credit facility.
S-32
Restatement
of Certain Financial Statements
On September 13, 2006, our Audit Committee determined that
we would be required to amend and restate previously issued
financial statements and other financial information for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 for
derivative instruments that did not qualify for hedge accounting
during those periods. We also determined that the impact of not
qualifying for hedge accounting was not material to our audited
financial statements for the full year 2005 or the period from
April 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004.
This determination was made because, during the third quarter of
2006, we, in consultation with our external auditors, discovered
that our application of, and documentation related to, the
short-cut and critical terms match
methods under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), for a
number of our derivative instruments was incorrect.
Following our discovery of the errors in the application and
documentation of hedge accounting under SFAS 133, we
initiated a comprehensive review of all of our determinations
and documentation related to hedge accounting for our derivative
instruments, as well as our related processes and procedures. As
a result of that review, we determined that none of our interest
rate and foreign exchange derivative instruments met the
criteria required for use of either the short-cut or
critical terms match methods of hedge accounting for
all periods from April 13, 2004 (inception) through
June 30, 2006. We are not permitted to retroactively apply
an appropriate method of qualifying for hedge accounting
treatment for these instruments and, as a result, the changes in
the fair value of these derivative instruments during their term
needed to be reflected as a net non-cash unrealized gain or loss
on derivative instruments in the income statement rather than in
other comprehensive income in the balance sheet. The effect of
this error on our consolidated balance sheet was immaterial and
had no net effect on operating income, cash from operations or
consolidated statements of cash flows.
On October 13, 2006, management recommended to the Audit
Committee that our unaudited 2005 quarterly financial statements
and financial information as well as 2005 financial information
for our airport services and airport parking segments within
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations should be restated to reflect the
elimination of hedge accounting for all of our derivative
instruments. The Audit Committee agreed with managements
recommendation and determined that such previously reported 2005
unaudited quarterly financial statements, quarterly financial
information and segment financial information within
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations should also no longer be relied upon.
On October 16, 2006, we filed amended quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q/A
to restate our financial statements and other financial
information for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and
June 30, 2006, as well as a current report on
Form 8-K
amending filings on
Form 8-K/A
previously filed on June 28, 2006 and August 28, 2006,
which included pro forma financial information. We also filed an
amended annual report on
Form 10-K/A
for the full year 2005 in which we corrected certain quarterly
and segment financial information for that year, but did not
change the audited annual financial results.
In our restatement, managements disclosure on internal
controls over financial reporting indicate that our management
found a material weakness related to SFAS 133 as of
December 31, 2005, March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006 and, therefore, that our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective at those dates. We reported increased net
income for each of the first two fiscal quarters of 2006 as a
result of the restatements.
We do not intend to use hedge accounting through the remainder
of 2006. Therefore, changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments will be recorded as a pre-tax non-cash gain or loss
in our income statement and will result in a corresponding
after-tax increase or decrease in net income and EBITDA. For the
third quarter of 2006, we expect to record a pre-tax loss in the
fair value of derivatives in the range of $18 million to
$20 million on a consolidated basis.
S-33
We intend to apply an appropriate method of effectiveness
testing for these instruments in the first quarter of 2007 and
expect that they will qualify for hedge accounting from that
time. Regardless of the accounting treatment reflected in its
financial statements, we continue to believe that our various
derivative instruments are economically effective hedges of our
exposure to interest and currency exchange rate fluctuations.
Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
conducted the evaluation and restatement of these matters in
consultation with KPMG LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm and auditor for all affected periods.
Results
of Operations
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Key
Factors Affecting Operating Results
We recognized net income of $17.0 million for the first six
months of 2006, as compared to $7.6 million for the first
six months of 2005. Consolidated performance was primarily
driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
positive contributions from our acquisitions during the last
twelve months, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition of a Las Vegas FBO (Eagle Aviation Resources) in our
airport services business;
|
|
|
|
eight new locations in our airport parking business;
|
|
|
|
our acquisition of IMTT, which declared a $7.0 million
distribution during the second quarter; and
|
|
|
|
our acquisition of TGC;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased gross profit across our existing businesses driven by
improved performance at our airport services and airport parking
businesses;
|
|
|
|
recognition of distributions and loan repayments from our
existing unconsolidated businesses totaling $3.4 million to
date in 2006;
|
|
|
|
higher management fees, including the $4.1 million
performance fee earned by our Manager in the first quarter,
which it has reinvested in shares of trust stock, and higher
base management fees due to our increased investments;
|
|
|
|
an increase in interest expenses due to the overall increase in
our debt to partially fund our acquisitions, coupled with an
overall increase in interest rates; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in unrealized gains on derivative instruments of
$18.1 million over the $2.0 million reported in 2005.
|
S-34
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated results of operations are summarized below ($
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from fuel sales
|
|
$
|
98,914
|
|
|
$
|
64,391
|
|
|
|
34,523
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
|
$
|
143,273
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
90,630
|
|
|
|
71,190
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
156,167
|
|
Financing and equipment lease
income
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
192,127
|
|
|
|
138,254
|
|
|
|
53,873
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
304,743
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
61,279
|
|
|
|
36,803
|
|
|
|
24,476
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
84,806
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
43,664
|
|
|
|
36,566
|
|
|
|
7,098
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
81,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
87,184
|
|
|
|
64,885
|
|
|
|
22,299
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
138,103
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
48,244
|
|
|
|
38,286
|
|
|
|
9,958
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
82,636
|
|
Fees to our Manager
|
|
|
10,196
|
|
|
|
4,152
|
|
|
|
6,044
|
|
|
|
145.6
|
|
|
|
9,294
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
6,007
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
7,026
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
14,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,887
|
|
|
|
13,380
|
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
33.7
|
|
|
$
|
25,351
|
|
Other income
(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
6,184
|
|
|
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
12,361
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
4,064
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(31,267
|
)
|
|
|
(15,269
|
)
|
|
|
(15,998
|
)
|
|
|
(104.8
|
)
|
|
|
(33,800
|
)
|
Equity in earnings and
amortization charges of investee
|
|
|
5,568
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
983.3
|
|
|
|
3,685
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative
instruments
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
18,124
|
|
|
|
889.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
(88.8
|
)
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes and
minority interests
|
|
|
20,161
|
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
11,638
|
|
|
|
136.5
|
|
|
|
11,784
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(3,011
|
)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
(2,432
|
)
|
|
|
(420.0
|
)
|
|
|
3,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before minority
interests
|
|
|
17,150
|
|
|
|
7,944
|
|
|
|
9,206
|
|
|
|
115.9
|
|
|
|
15,399
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(57.4
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
16,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,587
|
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
124.0
|
|
|
$
|
15,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit
The increase in our consolidated gross profit was due primarily
to the acquisitions of the Las Vegas FBO in the third quarter of
2005, six off-airport parking facilities (collectively referred
to as SunPark) during the second half of 2005 and
TGC on June 7, 2006. Additionally, higher average dollar
per gallon fuel margins combined with stable fuel volumes at
existing locations in our airport services business, and higher
average revenue per car out in our airport parking business,
contributed to increases in gross profit.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The most significant factors in the increase in selling, general
and administrative expenses were:
|
|
|
|
|
$1.8 million additional costs from our TGC acquisition not
reflected in 2005 results;
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
additional costs at our airport parking businesss
corporate office primarily to support a larger organization
resulting from growth in number of locations;
|
|
|
|
additional compensation expenses related to stock appreciation
rights issued during 2006; and
|
|
|
|
additional corporate selling, general and administrative costs
of $1.1 million due primarily to costs of approximately
$461,000 related to an unsuccessful acquisition bid as well as
Sarbanes-Oxley costs.
|
Additionally, the management fee paid to our Manager increased
due to $4.1 million in performance fees in 2006 compared to
none in 2005, as well as a $1.9 million increase in the
base fee due primarily to our increased investments.
Other
Income (Expense)
Our dividend income in 2006 consists of a dividend declared by
and received from SEW in the first quarter and a dividend
declared by MCG in the second quarter. The comparable SEW
dividend from 2005, which was higher than the SEW dividend
received in 2006, was both declared and received in the second
quarter.
Interest income increased primarily as a result of higher
interest rates on invested cash in 2006. Interest expense
increased due mostly to a higher level of debt in 2006.
Our equity in the earnings on our Yorkshire Link investment
increased, primarily due to a gain from changes in the fair
value of interest rate swaps that Yorkshire records in the
income statement, compared with a loss recorded in the second
quarter of 2005.
The decrease in other expense was due primarily to advisory fees
incurred in 2005 related to our acquisition of two FBOs in
California.
We do not intend to use hedge accounting through the remainder
of 2006. Therefore, changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments will be recorded as a pre-tax non-cash gain or loss
in our income statement and will result in a corresponding
after-tax increase or decrease in net income and EBITDA. For the
third quarter of 2006, we expect to record a pre-tax loss in the
fair value of derivatives in the range of $18 million to
$20 million on a consolidated basis.
Income
Taxes
We recorded a pre-tax loss in the first six months of 2005.
However, since we were recently formed with no operating
history, we recorded a full valuation allowance on the benefits
of the pre-tax loss incurred. Therefore, we recorded no income
tax benefit in the first six months of 2005.
For the 2006 year, we project a net loss before taxes at
the MIC Inc. level, for which we expect to record an income tax
benefit. We also project deriving net income before taxes
outside MIC Inc. that will not be subject to income tax payable
by us. Since the income from outside MIC Inc. is projected to
exceed the pre-tax loss at the MIC Inc. level, we expect to
recognize pre-tax income on a consolidated basis.
EBITDA
We have included EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, on both a
consolidated basis as well as for each segment as we consider it
to be an important measure of our overall performance. We
believe EBITDA provides additional insight into the performance
of our operating companies and our ability to service our
obligations and support our ongoing dividend policy.
S-36
A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA is provided below ($ in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
16,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,587
|
|
|
$
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
124.0
|
|
|
$
|
15,196
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28,385
|
|
|
|
12,939
|
|
|
|
15,446
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
29,736
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
3,011
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
420.0
|
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
Depreciation(2)
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
6,631
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
14,098
|
|
Amortization(3)
|
|
|
7,026
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
14,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
63,710
|
|
|
$
|
34,056
|
|
|
|
29,654
|
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
$
|
70,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income and EBITDA include non-cash unrealized gain from
derivative instruments of $20.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes depreciation expense of $1.6 million and
$1.0 million for our airport parking business for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $2.8 million and $2.8 million for
the direct energy business for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which are included in
the cost of services on our consolidated condensed income
statement. Does not include $1.1 million of depreciation
expense related to our 50% investment in IMTT for the six months
ended June 30, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Does not include $1.9 million and $2.4 million of
amortization expense related to intangible assets in connection
with our investment in the toll road business for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
$189,000 of amortization expense related to intangible assets of
IMTT for the six months ended June 30, 2006. |
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
We recognized net income of $15.2 million from our existing
businesses and investments for the year ended December 31,
2005. Consolidated performance was primarily driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
net income of $7.1 million from our airport services
business and $452,000 from our district energy business,
partially offset by a loss of $3.3 million from our airport
parking business;
|
|
|
|
dividend income of $8.5 million from our investment in SEW
and $4.2 million from our investment in MCG; and
|
|
|
|
net income from our 50% share of the toll road business was
$3.7 million, net of amortization expense of
$3.8 million.
|
Summary
of Our New Businesses and Results of Operations
The
Gas Company
On June 7, 2006, we completed our acquisition of TGC from
k1 Ventures Limited. TGC is a Hawaii limited liability company
that owns and operates the regulated synthetic natural gas
production and distribution business in Hawaii and distributes
and sells liquefied petroleum gas through unregulated
operations. TGC operates in both regulated and unregulated
markets on the islands of Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Kauai, Molokai and
Lanai. The Hawaiian market includes Hawaiis
1.2 million full-time residents and the businesses serving
more than seven million annual visitors.
TGC has two primary businesses, utility (or regulated) and
non-utility (or unregulated):
|
|
|
|
|
The utility business includes distribution and sales of SNG on
the island of Oahu and distribution and sale of LPG to
approximately 35,850 customers through localized distribution
systems located on the islands of Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Kauai,
Molokai and Lanai (listed by size
|
S-37
|
|
|
|
|
of market). Utility revenue consists principally of sales of
thermal units, or therms, of SNG and gallons of LPG. One gallon
of LPG is the equivalent of 0.913 therms. The operating costs
for the utility business include the cost of locally purchased
feedstock, the cost of manufacturing SNG from the feedstock, LPG
purchase costs and the cost of distributing SNG and LPG to
customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-utility business comprises the sale of LPG to
approximately 31,550 customers, through truck deliveries to
individual tanks located on customer sites on Oahu, Hawaii,
Maui, Kauai, Molokai and Lanai. Non-utility revenue consists of
sales of gallons of LPG. The operating costs for the non-utility
business include the cost of purchased LPG and the cost of
distributing the LPG to customers.
|
SNG and LPG have a wide number of commercial and residential
applications, including electricity generation, water heating,
drying, cooking, and gas lighting. LPG is also used as a fuel
for some specialty vehicles and forklifts. Gas customers range
from residential customers to a wide variety of commercial
customers.
Revenue is primarily a function of the volume of SNG and LPG
consumed by customers and the price per thermal unit or gallon
charged to customers. Because both SNG and LPG are derived from
petroleum, revenue levels, without volume changes, will
generally track global oil prices. Utility revenue includes fuel
adjustment charges through which the changes in fuel costs are
passed through to utility customers. As a result, the key
measure of performance for this business is gross profit.
Volume is primarily driven by demographic and economic growth in
the state of Hawaii and by shifts of end users between gas and
other energy sources and competitors. The Hawaii Department of
Business, Economic Development, and Tourism has forecast
population growth for the state of 1.1% per year through 2010.
There are approximately 250 regulated utilities operating in
Hawaii. These comprise one gas utility, four electric utilities,
34 water and sewage utilities and 211 telecommunications
utilities. The four electric utility operators, combined, serve
approximately 450,000 customers. Since all businesses and
residences have electrical connections, this provides an
estimate of the total gas market potential. TGCs regulated
customer base is approximately 35,850 and its non-regulated
customer base is approximately 31,550. Accordingly, TGCs
overall market penetration, as a percentage of total electric
utility customers in Hawaii, is approximately 15% of Hawaii
businesses and residences. TGC has 100% of Hawaiis
regulated gas business and over 77% of Hawaiis unregulated
gas business.
Prices charged by TGC to its customers for the utility gas
business are based on Hawaii Public Utilities Commission, or
HPUC, regulated rates that allow TGC the opportunity to recover
its costs of providing utility gas service, including operating
expenses, taxes, a return of capital investments through
recovery of depreciation and a return on the capital invested.
TGCs rate structure generally allows it to maintain a
relatively consistent dollar-based margin per thermal unit by
passing increases or decreases in fuel costs to customers
through the fuel adjustment charges without filing a general
rate case.
TGC incurs expenses in operating and maintaining its facilities
and distribution network, comprising a SNG plant, a
22-mile
transmission line, 1,100 miles of distribution pipelines,
several tank storage facilities and a fleet of vehicles. These
costs are generally fixed in nature. Other operating expenses
incurred, such as LPG, feedstock for the SNG plant and
revenue-based taxes, are generally sensitive to the volume of
product sold. In addition, TGC incurs general and administrative
expenses at its executive office that include expenses for
senior management, accounting, information technology, human
resources, environmental compliance, regulatory compliance,
employee benefits, rents, utilities, insurance and other normal
business costs.
The rates that are charged to non-utility customers are set
based on LPG and delivery costs, and on the cost of fuel and
competitive factors.
As part of the regulatory approval process of our acquisition of
TGC, we agreed to 14 regulatory conditions addressing a variety
of matters. The material conditions include:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to recover goodwill, transaction or transition
costs in future rate cases;
|
S-38
|
|
|
|
|
the inability of TGC to file for a new rate case with a
prospective test year commencing prior to 2009;
|
|
|
|
a requirement to limit TGC and HGCs ratio of consolidated
debt to total capital to 65%;
|
|
|
|
a requirement to maintain $20.0 million in readily
available cash resources at TGC, HGC or the company;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that TGC revise its Fuel Adjustment Clause to
reconcile monthly charges to corresponding actually incurred
fuel expenses; and
|
|
|
|
a requirement that TGC provide a $4.1 million customer
appreciation credit to its gas customers.
|
Results
of Operations
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
We acquired TGC on June 7, 2006. Accordingly, our
consolidated operating results only reflect the results of
operations of TGC for the
24-day
period from June 7, 2006 through June 30, 2006. For
this 24-day
period, revenue was $10.6 million, gross profit was
$4.2 million and income before taxes was $312,000. Income
before taxes excludes a gain of $6.0 million recognized by
TGC relating to swaps transferred to TGC by us. This gain was
eliminated on consolidation.
Because TGCs results of operations are only included in
our financial results for a short period of 2006, the following
analysis compares the historical results of operations for TGC
under its current and prior owner. We believe that this is a
more appropriate approach to explaining the historical financial
performance and trends of TGC than discussing the composition of
the 24-day
period that is included in our results. The following table
compares the historical financial performance of TGC for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 (including the period owned by
us) to the comparable 2005 period.
Key
Factors Affecting Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
Therms sold in each of the utility and non-utility sectors
increased, mostly resulting from organic growth in the business;
|
|
|
|
Cost per therm increased by 24% due principally to higher
petroleum costs that are generally recoverable in billing rates;
and
|
|
|
|
Gross profit per therm increased 6% for the utility and 8% for
the non-utility operations.
|
S-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
$
|
48,784
|
|
|
$
|
41,017
|
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
33,784
|
|
|
|
29,890
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
82,568
|
|
|
|
70,907
|
|
|
|
11,661
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
Generation and purchased
gas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
|
26,642
|
|
|
|
20,256
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
19,926
|
|
|
|
17,146
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
33,505
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Transmission and distribution
|
|
|
7,049
|
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
Taxes-other than income
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,816
|
|
|
|
7,503
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Interest expense (net)
|
|
|
(3,960
|
)
|
|
|
(1,883
|
)
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
|
(225.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes(1)
|
|
$
|
7,474
|
|
|
$
|
10,383
|
|
|
|
(4,821
|
)
|
|
|
(46.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Income Before
Taxes to EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes(1)
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
|
$
|
10,383
|
|
|
|
(4,821
|
)
|
|
|
(46.4
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
12,307
|
|
|
$
|
14,839
|
|
|
|
(2,532
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gain on transfer of swaps of $6.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 has been excluded from income
before taxes in the above table, since this amount was
eliminated on consolidation at the MIC level in the second
quarter of 2006. |
Gross
Profit
The key factors generating gross profit are volume of SNG and
LPG sold and dollar-based margin per therm. TGCs gross
profit growth was due primarily to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
therms sold in both the utility and non-utility sectors
increased 1% for the six-month period. This overall increase in
therms sold included the benefit of a 1% increase in the number
of customers that TGC serves.
|
|
|
|
utility gross profit increased 6% for the six-month period due
to lower losses of gas while the product is in pipelines and
increased revenue taxes (which benefit gross profit since the
revenue-based taxes are included in revenue but the related and
offsetting expense is included below the gross profit line, in
operating costs).
|
S-40
|
|
|
|
|
gross profit per therm for the non-utility operations increased
8% for the six-month period due to the pro-rata accrual of a
contract revenue adjustment in 2006 and lower propane inventory
losses.
|
Operating
Expenses
Production costs and transmission and distribution costs were
higher for the six-month period due to increased personnel
costs, higher electricity costs, the cost to rent an electrical
generator at the SNG plant due to reliability issues with a
power supplier, costs associated with converting pipeline maps
to an electronic database and a non-recurring cost to repair the
SNG transmission line.
Taxes other than income are comprised of payroll taxes and an
8.9% revenue tax on regulated sales. The revenue tax expense
increased as a result of higher sales volumes and revenue, a
large component of which was due to increased fuel costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased due
primarily to personnel and benefit cost increases and
transitional costs relating to staff resourcing, offset by cost
savings resulting from the termination of two administrative
services agreements from third party providers.
Depreciation and amortization for the first half of 2006 was
slightly higher than in 2005 due to equipment additions and
depreciation and amortization related to the higher asset basis
following our purchase of TGC in June 2006.
Interest
Expense, Net
Interest expense increased in 2006 due primarily to increasing
interest rates and the higher debt balance incurred to fund our
acquisition of the business in early June 2006. The
$160 million of long-term debt, which carries a blended
margin of 50 basis points over LIBOR, has been hedged
through 2009. The effective interest rate on the debt is 5.345%.
Other
(Expense) Income
Other expense for the first half of 2006 was comprised
principally of sale closing expenses. Other income for the first
half of 2005 was primarily a $1.3 million
non-recurring
payment from an electric utility company to reimburse TGC under
a cost sharing arrangement, for entry into an energy corridor
fuel pipeline
right-of-way.
EBITDA
For the first half of 2006 compared with the same period of
2005, EBITDA declined by $2.5 million. The decrease was the
result of approximately $2.0 million of
non-recurring
costs associated with our purchase of the business, partially
offset by improved operating results of $500,000 and was also
due to the 2005 receipt of a $1.3 million energy corridor
payment that did not reoccur in 2006.
Ten
Months Ended April 30, 2006 Compared to Twelve Months Ended
June 30, 2005
The comparative periods discussed below consist of
10 months, 12 months and 11 months, respectively.
Accordingly, we have compared these periods on an average
dollars or units per month basis as we believe so doing provides
a more meaningful analysis than comparing periods of varying
length. We do not believe that seasonality is a material factor
over any particular period.
Key
Factors Affecting Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
Average therms sold per month in the regulated sector was flat,
while average gallons sold per month in the unregulated sector
increased 3%;
|
|
|
|
Dollar margin per therm increased 8% while dollar margin per
gallon increased 5%; and
|
|
|
|
Average gross profit per month increased 8%.
|
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
Month $
|
|
|
Month %
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Month(1)
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Month(1)
|
|
|
Change(1)
|
|
|
Change(1)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
$
|
69,164
|
|
|
$
|
6,916
|
|
|
$
|
70,514
|
|
|
$
|
5,876
|
|
|
$
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
60,771
|
|
|
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
61,899
|
|
|
|
5,158
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
129,935
|
|
|
|
12,994
|
|
|
|
132,413
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Generation and purchased
gas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
|
34,111
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
31,308
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
37,179
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
36,185
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
58,645
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
64,902
|
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
36,287
|
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
40,206
|
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
17,885
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
|
|
19,640
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Interest expense (net)
|
|
|
(3,857
|
)
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
(3,484
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(49.4
|
)%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,526
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.5
|
)%
|
Cumulative effect of prior period
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,384
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
$
|
579
|
|
|
$
|
10,815
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(35.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income
to EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of prior period
adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
3,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
23,032
|
|
|
$
|
2,303
|
|
|
$
|
26,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subtotals and totals may be off $1 due to rounding. |
S-42
Revenue
and Gross Profit
The key factors generating TGCs revenue and gross profit
are volume of SNG and LPG sold and dollar-based margin per therm
or gallon, respectively. TGCs average monthly revenue and
gross profit growth was due primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
rising cost of SNG and LPG, which is generally passed on to
customers. To date, there has not been any negative impact on
demand for SNG and LPG due to the increases in these costs; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in utility therm margins resulting from reduced SNG
gas line losses and recovery of percentage-based revenue taxes
that are recorded in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
|
The price increases in SNG were the result of an
average 29% increase in the cost of feedstock experienced
in the period ended April 30, 2006 when compared to the
period ended June 30, 2005. Price increases passed through
to customers were consistent with a formula permitted by the
HPUC. The price increases in LPG were the result of an
average 20% increase in the cost of feedstock between these
periods that TGC passed on to its customers.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Average selling, general and administrative expenses per month
increased approximately 8.3%. This was due primarily to salary
and wage merit and union contract increases, filling of vacant
positions, repair of damages caused by a fire at the SNG plant,
rental of a large electrical generator due to reliability issues
with a power supplier, increases in vehicle fleet fuel costs,
increases in employee benefit costs, higher
percentage-of-revenue taxes and other inflationary cost
increases.
Interest
Expense, Net
Average net interest expense per month increased 32.8% due
primarily to increasing interest rates. The outstanding debt is
unhedged.
Other
Income
Other income decreased because of the receipt of a payment from
an electric utility for the shared use of an Energy Corridor in
2005.
Cumulative
Effect of Prior Period Adjustment, Net of Tax
Prior to April 30, 2006, TGC followed the provisions of
SFAS No. 143 in accounting for its asset retirement
obligation. In applying this Statement, TGC took into
consideration only those legal obligations associated with the
retirement of long-lived assets that it considered to be
probable of being incurred.
Effective from April 30, 2006, TGC adopted the provisions
of FIN 47, and also recorded an asset retirement obligation
in those cases where the obligation to perform the asset
retirement activity was unconditional, even though the timing or
the method of settling the obligation was uncertain.
Twelve
Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Eleven Months Ended
June 30, 2004
Key
Factors Affecting Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
Average therms sold per month increased 1%, while average
gallons sold per month increased 5%;
|
|
|
|
Dollar margin per therm increased 4% while dollar margin per
gallon decreased 7%; and
|
|
|
|
Average gross profit per month increased 2%.
|
S-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Eleven Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
Month $
|
|
|
Month %
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Month(1)
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Month(1)
|
|
|
Change(1)
|
|
|
Change(1)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
$
|
70,514
|
|
|
$
|
5,876
|
|
|
$
|
55,727
|
|
|
$
|
5,066
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
61,899
|
|
|
|
5,158
|
|
|
|
49,156
|
|
|
|
4,469
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
132,413
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
104,883
|
|
|
|
9,535
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Generation and purchased
gas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
|
31,308
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
21,482
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
36,185
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
24,972
|
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
64,902
|
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
58,429
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
40,206
|
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
35,227
|
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19,640
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
18,730
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
Interest expense (net)
|
|
|
(3,484
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(2,609
|
)
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(6,390
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,815
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
9,625
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income to
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
26,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
23,096
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Subtotals and totals may be off $1 due to rounding.
|
Revenue
and Gross Profit
The key factors generating TGCs revenue and gross profit
are volume of SNG and LPG sold and dollar-based margin per therm
or gallon. TGCs average monthly revenue and gross profit
growth was due primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
rising cost of SNG and LPG, which is generally passed on to
customers;
|
|
|
|
an increase in both thermal unit and gallon sales volume and
increased dollar per therm fuel margins, partially offset by a
decrease in dollar per gallon fuel margins;
|
|
|
|
an increase in utility therm margins resulting from reduced
utility SNG gas line losses and coverage of percentage-based
revenue taxes that are recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses; and
|
S-44
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in non-utility margins resulting from comparably
higher costs of LPG due to increased purchases of LPG from
foreign suppliers at a cost higher than local supplies. TGC
chose to make these foreign purchases to ensure adequate supply
for TGCs customers following local fuel shortfalls. TGC
made a business decision not to entirely pass these increased
costs to TGCs customers due to long-term customer
relations, public relations, and competitive considerations.
|
The price increases in SNG were the result of an
average 32% increase in the cost of feedstock experienced
in the period ended June 30, 2005 when compared to the
period ended June 30, 2004. The price increases in LPG were
the result of an average 27% increase in the cost of
feedstock between these periods.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Average selling, general and administrative expenses per month
increased approximately 4.6%. This was due primarily to salary
and wage merit and union contract increases, increases in
employee benefit costs, increases in vehicle fleet fuel costs,
higher
percentage-of-revenue
taxes and other inflationary cost increases.
Interest
Expense, Net
Average net interest expense per month increased 22.4% due
primarily to increasing interest rates. The outstanding debt is
unhedged.
Other
Income
Other income increased because of the receipt of a non-recurring
payment from an electric utility for the shared use of an Energy
Corridor in 2005.
International-Matex
Tank Terminals
On May 1, 2006, we completed our acquisition, through our
wholly owned subsidiary, MIC Inc., of 50% of the shares of IMTT
Holdings Inc. (formerly known as Loving Enterprises, Inc). IMTT
Holdings is the ultimate holding company for a group of
companies and partnerships that own a bulk liquid storage
terminal business operating as IMTT.
IMTT provides bulk liquid storage and handling services in North
America through a total of eight terminals located on the East,
West and Gulf coasts and the Great Lakes region of the United
States and a partially owned terminal in each of Quebec and
Newfoundland, Canada, with the largest terminals located on the
New York Harbor and on the Mississippi River near the Gulf of
Mexico. IMTT stores and handles petroleum products, various
chemicals and vegetable and animal oils. IMTT is one of the
largest companies in the bulk liquid storage terminal industry
in the United States, based on storage capacity.
The key drivers of IMTTs revenue and gross profit are the
amount of tank capacity rented to customers and the rates at
which such capacity is rented. Customers generally rent tanks
under contracts with terms of between one and five years. Under
these contracts, customers generally pay for the capacity of the
tank irrespective of whether the tank is actually used. The key
driver of storage capacity utilization and tank rental rates is
the demand for capacity relative to the supply of capacity in a
particular region (e.g., New York Harbor, Lower Mississippi
River). Demand for capacity is primarily a function of the level
of consumption of the bulk liquid products stored by the
terminals and the level of importation and exportation of such
products. Demand for petroleum and liquid chemical products, the
main products stored by IMTT, historically has generally been
driven by the level of economic activity. We believe major
increases in the supply of new tank capacity in IMTTs key
markets has been and will continue to be limited by the
availability of waterfront land with access to the
infrastructure necessary for land based receipt and distribution
of stored product (road, rail and pipelines), lengthy
environmental permitting processes and high capital costs. We
believe a favorable supply/demand balance for bulk liquid
storage currently exists in the markets serviced by IMTTs
major facilities. This factor, when combined with the attributes
of IMTTs facilities such as deep water drafts and
S-45
access to land based infrastructure, have resulted in available
storage capacity at IMTTs major facilities for both
petroleum and chemical products being consistently fully or near
fully rented to customers.
IMTT earns revenues at its terminals from a number of sources
including storage of bulk liquids (per barrel, per month
rental), throughput of liquids (handling charges), heating (a
pass through of the cost associated with heating liquids to
prevent excessive viscosity) and other (revenue from blending,
packaging and warehousing, for example). The key elements of
revenue generally increase annually on the basis of inflation
escalation provisions in customer contracts.
In operating its terminals, IMTT incurs labor costs, fuel costs,
repair and maintenance costs, real and personal property taxes
and other costs (which include insurance and other operating
costs such as utilities and inventory used in packaging and
drumming activities).
In 2005, IMTT generated approximately 53% of its total terminal
revenue and 45% of its terminal gross profit at its Bayonne, NJ
facility, which services New York Harbor, and 32% of its total
terminal revenue and 47% of its terminal gross profit at its St.
Rose, LA, Gretna, LA and Avondale, LA facilities, which together
service the lower Mississippi River region (with St. Rose being
the largest contributor).
There are two key factors that are likely to materially impact
IMTTs total terminal revenue and terminal gross profit in
the future. First, IMTT has achieved substantial increases in
storage rates at its Bayonne and St. Rose facilities as customer
contracts expiring in 2005 and early 2006 have been renewed. In
addition, some customers of IMTT have been extending contracts
that do not expire until late 2006 and 2007 at rates above the
existing rates under such contracts. As a consequence, based on
the current level of demand for bulk liquid storage in New York
Harbor and the lower Mississippi River, we anticipate that IMTT
will achieve annual increases in storage revenues in excess of
inflation at least through 2008.
Second, over the course of 2006 and 2007, IMTT intends to
undertake significant growth capital expenditure which is
expected to contribute significantly to terminal gross profit in
2008 and beyond. IMTT is currently constructing a bulk liquid
chemical storage and handling facility on the Mississippi River
at Geismar, LA. To date, IMTT has committed approximately
$160.0 million of growth capital expenditure to the
project. Based on the current project scope and subject to
certain minimum volumes of chemical products being handled by
the facility, existing customer contracts are anticipated to
generate terminal gross profit and EBITDA of at least
approximately $18.8 million per year assuming the major
customer contract is ultimately accounted for as an operating
lease (in the event that the major customer contract is
ultimately accounted for as a finance lease, the projects
contribution to terminal gross profit and EBITDA will be
reduced, but the projects contribution to IMTTs
distributable cash flow will be unchanged). Completion of
construction of the initial $160.0 million phase of the
Geismar, LA project is targeted for the end of 2007. In the
aftermath of hurricane Katrina, construction costs in the region
affected by the hurricane have increased and labor shortages
have been experienced. Although a significant amount of the
impact of hurricane Katrina on construction costs has already
been incorporated into the capital commitment plan, there could
be further negative impacts on the cost of constructing the
Geismar, LA project (which may not be offset by an increase in
gross profit and EBITDA contribution) and/or the project
construction schedule. In addition to the Geismar, LA project,
IMTT is currently in the process of constructing 15 new storage
tanks with a total capacity of approximately 1.5 million
barrels at its Louisiana facilities at a total estimated cost of
$39.0 million. It is anticipated that construction of these
tanks will be completed from late 2006 through late 2007. Rental
contracts with initial terms of at least three years have
already been executed in relation to 11 of these tanks with the
balance of the tanks to be used to service customers while their
existing tanks are undergoing scheduled maintenance over the
next five years. Overall, it is anticipated that the operation
of the new tanks will contribute approximately $6.4 million
to IMTTs terminal gross profit and EBITDA annually.
As prescribed in the shareholders agreement between MIC,
IMTT Holdings and its other shareholders, until
December 31, 2007, subject to compliance with law, the debt
covenants applicable to its subsidiaries and retention of
appropriate levels of reserves, IMTT Holdings is required to
distribute $7.0 million per quarter to us. At June 30,
2006, we recorded a $7.0 million receivable in connection
with the expected receipt of our share of the cash distribution
for the second quarter of 2006 which was received on
July 26, 2006. Subsequent to December 31, 2007,
subject to the same limitations applicable prior to
December 31, 2007 and subject to IMTT Holdings
S-46
consolidated net debt to EBITDA ratio not exceeding 4.25:1 as at
each quarter end, IMTT Holdings is required to distribute all of
its consolidated cash flow from operations and cash flows from
(but not used in) investing activities less maintenance and
environmental remediation capital expenditure to its
shareholders quarterly.
As discussed above, in total, IMTT intends to undertake at least
approximately $191.0 million of aggregate growth capital
expenditure in 2006 and 2007. It is anticipated that this growth
capital expenditure and IMTTs dividend payments during
2006 and 2007, as prescribed in the shareholders
agreement, will be fully funded using a combination of
IMTTs cash flow from operations, IMTTs debt
facilities, the proceeds from MICs investment in IMTT
Holdings and future shareholder loans from the other
shareholders of IMTT Holdings. IMTTs current debt
facilities will need to be refinanced on amended terms and
increased in size during 2006 and 2007 to provide the funding
necessary for IMTT to fully pursue its expansion plans.
Based on current market conditions and assuming that the
construction of the new facility at Geismar is completed at the
end of 2007 and a number of the expansion opportunities
currently being considered by IMTT are pursued and completed
prior to the end of 2007, it is anticipated that IMTTs
total terminal revenue, terminal gross profit and cash flow
provided by operating activities will increase significantly
through 2008, enabling the initial level of annual distributions
from IMTT to MIC to be substantially maintained beyond 2007.
Our interest in IMTT Holdings, from the date of closing our
acquisition, May 1, 2006, is reflected in our equity in
earnings and amortization charges of investee line in our
financial statements.
Results
of Operations
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
We completed our acquisition of a 50% interest in IMTT on
May 1, 2006. Therefore IMTT only contributed to our
consolidated results from this date. We included $240,000 of net
income in our consolidated results for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, consisting of $1.0 million equity in
the earnings of IMTT (net of $554,000 tax expense) less $789,000
depreciation and amortization expense (net of $546,000 tax
benefit). IMTT declared a dividend of $14.0 million in June
2006 with $7.0 million payable to MIC Inc. that we recorded
as a receivable at June 30, 2006, and received on
July 26, 2006.
To enable meaningful analysis of IMTTs performance across
periods, IMTTs performance for the full six months ended
June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period, is
discussed below.
Key
Factors Affecting Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue and terminal gross profit increased principally
due to increases in average tank rental rates; and
|
|
|
|
Environmental response gross profit increased due to activities
related to hurricane Katrina and a significant spill response
job undertaken in the second quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue
|
|
$
|
94,332
|
|
|
$
|
88,584
|
|
|
|
5,748
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Terminal revenue
heating
|
|
|
10,542
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Environmental response revenue
|
|
|
10,006
|
|
|
|
5,904
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
Nursery revenue
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
120,937
|
|
|
|
110,717
|
|
|
|
10,220
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
S-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal operating costs
|
|
|
48,731
|
|
|
|
45,867
|
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Terminal operating
costs fuel
|
|
|
9,435
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Environmental response operating
costs
|
|
|
5,954
|
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Nursery operating costs
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
70,392
|
|
|
|
66,216
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Terminal gross profit
|
|
|
46,708
|
|
|
|
42,588
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Environmental response gross profit
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
2,689
|
|
|
|
197.3
|
|
Nursery gross profit
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
(139.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
50,545
|
|
|
|
44,501
|
|
|
|
6,044
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,866
|
|
|
|
10,213
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,165
|
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Mark-to-market
(gain) loss on non-hedging derivatives
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
(1,240
|
)
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
20,761
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,400
|
|
|
|
11,334
|
|
|
|
(1,934
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,486
|
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,614
|
|
|
$
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income to
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,614
|
|
|
$
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,400
|
|
|
|
11,334
|
|
|
|
(1,934
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,486
|
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,165
|
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
40,665
|
|
|
$
|
35,528
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
and Gross Profit
Terminal revenue increased due to a 1% increase in storage
capacity rented to customers in the six-month period, and a 6.6%
increase in average storage rates for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the corresponding period in 2005.
Overall storage capacity rented to customers remained
effectively stable at 95% of available storage capacity.
Terminal revenue also increased due to the increase in the
earnings of IMTTs Quebec terminal and the write-off of a
payable in the six-month period ended June 30, 2006
compared to the corresponding period in 2005. In the six months
to June 30, 2006, IMTT also achieved a $1.2 million
improvement in the differential between terminal
revenue heating and terminal operating
costs fuel due to increased demand for heating and
increases in unit fuel prices, both of which generated an
increased differential.
The increase in terminal revenue and heating differential was
partially offset by an increase in terminal operating costs.
This increase was principally due to general increases in direct
labor and health benefit costs, repair and maintenance and
property taxes, offset partially by a non-cash natural resource
damage settlement accrual in New Jersey in the second quarter of
2005 that did not reoccur in the second quarter of 2006.
Environmental response gross profit increased principally due to
spill
clean-up
activities resulting from hurricane Katrina and a significant
new spill response job undertaken.
S-48
The nursery gross profit decreased due to a reduction in demand
for plants and a write-down of unsaleable inventory in the
aftermath of hurricane Katrina.
Operating
Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased due to general
increases in direct labor and benefit expenses and expansion of
the environmental response businesss marketing function.
Interest
Expense, Net
Net interest expense declined due to the reduction of
outstanding debt and increase in interest from liquid asset
balances resulting from our investment in IMTT.
EBITDA
EBITDA increased due to the increased gross profit from terminal
operations and from environmental response activities offset
partially by a decline in gross profit contribution from the
nursery business and an increase in general and administrative
expenses.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Revenues from tank storage and terminal charges, railroad
operations, other rental income and other income reflected in
IMTT Holdings audited consolidated statements of income
for the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 have
been reclassified in the below presentation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
tank storage and terminal charges revenue has been segmented
into terminal revenue and terminal revenue heating
for a more meaningful analysis; and
|
|
|
|
other rental income, railroad operations revenue and other
income have been combined into terminal revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue
|
|
$
|
182,518
|
|
|
$
|
168,384
|
|
|
|
14,134
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Terminal revenue
heating
|
|
|
20,595
|
|
|
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
5,343
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
Environmental response revenue
|
|
|
37,107
|
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
20,983
|
|
|
|
130.1
|
|
Nursery revenue
|
|
|
10,404
|
|
|
|
10,907
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
250,624
|
|
|
|
210,667
|
|
|
|
39,957
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal operating costs
|
|
$
|
97,746
|
|
|
$
|
87,755
|
|
|
|
9,991
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Terminal operating
costs fuel
|
|
|
20,969
|
|
|
|
17,712
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Environmental response operating
costs
|
|
|
24,774
|
|
|
|
9,720
|
|
|
|
15,054
|
|
|
|
154.9
|
|
Nursery operating costs
|
|
|
10,268
|
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
153,757
|
|
|
|
126,323
|
|
|
|
27,434
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
Terminal gross profit
|
|
|
84,398
|
|
|
|
78,169
|
|
|
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Environmental response gross profit
|
|
|
12,333
|
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
|
|
92.6
|
|
Nursery gross profit
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
159.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
96,867
|
|
|
|
84,344
|
|
|
|
12,523
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
S-49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
22,834
|
|
|
|
20,911
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29,524
|
|
|
|
29,929
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Mark-to-market
gain on non-hedging derivatives
|
|
|
(2,637
|
)
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
47,146
|
|
|
|
35,817
|
|
|
|
11,329
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,100
|
)
|
|
|
(22,269
|
)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(11,670
|
)
|
|
|
(5,667
|
)
|
|
|
(6,003
|
)
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,376
|
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income to
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,376
|
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,100
|
|
|
|
22,269
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
11,670
|
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
105.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29,524
|
|
|
|
29,929
|
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
76,670
|
|
|
$
|
65,746
|
|
|
|
10,924
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal gross profit increased by $6.2 million (8%);
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue increased by $14.1 million. Of this
increase, $10.2 million was due to a combination of an
increase in storage capacity rented to customers (40% of the
$10.2 million increase) and increase in storage rates (60%
of the $10.2 million increase) and $3.2 million was
due to increased revenue from miscellaneous services. In 2005,
IMTT also achieved a $2.1 million improvement in the
differential between terminal revenue heating and
terminal operating costs fuel due to improved
customer contract terms and efficiency gains in the use of fuel;
|
|
|
|
The increase in terminal revenue and heating differential was
partially offset by a $10.0 million increase in terminal
operating costs. Of this increase in terminal operating costs,
$3.2 million related to the cost of a natural resource
damages settlement reached with the state of New Jersey which is
not expected to re-occur. The balance of the increase was due to
general increases in direct labor costs and health benefit
costs, property taxes, power costs and environmental compliance
costs;
|
|
|
|
In 2005, IMTTs major terminals maintained near full
storage capacity utilization and achieved increases in average
storage rates for all major petroleum products stored; and
|
|
|
|
Environmental response (Oil Mop) gross profit increased by
$5.9 million in 2005 principally due to spill
clean-up
activities resulting from Hurricane Katrina.
|
Operating
Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by
$1.9 million. Of this increase, $921,000 related to costs
incurred by IMTT when it temporarily relocated its head office
from New Orleans to Bayonne in the immediate aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina. This loss may be recoverable in whole or part
under IMTTs insurance policies, however, this has yet to
be confirmed. Other than a $325,000 insurance deductible
expensed during 2005, IMTT incurred no other material costs
related to Hurricane Katrina.
S-50
EBITDA
EBITDA increased due to increased gross profit from all
businesses partially offset by an increase in general and
administrative expenses.
Year
Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue
|
|
$
|
168,384
|
|
|
$
|
159,339
|
|
|
|
9,045
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Terminal revenue
heating
|
|
|
15,252
|
|
|
|
12,493
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
Environmental response revenue
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
54.9
|
|
Nursery revenue
|
|
|
10,907
|
|
|
|
10,822
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
210,667
|
|
|
|
193,066
|
|
|
|
17,601
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal operating costs
|
|
|
87,755
|
|
|
|
78,172
|
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Terminal operating
costs fuel
|
|
|
17,712
|
|
|
|
15,013
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
Environmental response operating
costs
|
|
|
9,720
|
|
|
|
9,172
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Nursery operating costs
|
|
|
11,136
|
|
|
|
11,391
|
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
126,323
|
|
|
|
113,748
|
|
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Terminal gross profit
|
|
|
78,169
|
|
|
|
78,647
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Environmental response gross profit
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
5,164
|
|
|
|
416.5
|
|
Nursery gross profit
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(59.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
84,344
|
|
|
|
79,318
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
20,911
|
|
|
|
20,823
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29,929
|
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Mark-to-market
gain on non-hedging derivatives
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
35,817
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(22,269
|
)
|
|
|
(21,671
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,851
|
)
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
98.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
$
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income to
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,881
|
|
|
$
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
22,269
|
|
|
|
21,671
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
98.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29,929
|
|
|
|
29,554
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
65,746
|
|
|
$
|
59,966
|
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal gross profit was substantially unchanged;
|
|
|
|
Terminal revenue increased by $9.0 million. Of this increase,
$8.9 million was due to a combination of an increase in
storage capacity rented to customers (72% of the
$8.9 million increase) and increases in storage rates (28%
of the $8.9 million increase);
|
S-51
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in terminal revenue was offset by increases in
terminal operating costs. Of the increase in terminal operating
costs, approximately $3.0 million related to the operating
costs associated with a facility that was acquired in 2004 and
combined into IMTTs Bayonne facility. The balance of the
increase was due to general increases in direct labor costs,
health benefit costs, workers compensation insurance costs and
increases in property taxes and environmental compliance costs;
|
|
|
|
In 2004, IMTTs major terminals maintained near full
storage capacity utilization and achieved increases in average
storage rates for all major petroleum products stored; and
|
|
|
|
Environmental response (Oil Mop) gross profit increased by
$5.2 million in 2004 principally due to spill
clean-up
activities resulting from Hurricane Ivan.
|
EBITDA
EBITDA increased due to increased gross profit from
environmental response activities.
Trajen
Holdings, Inc.
Trajens 23 sites have been acquired over a period of
several years and include five sites that were acquired in 2005
and five sites that were acquired in 2006. A number of the sites
acquired in 2005 and 2006 are material to Trajens overall
results. The relatively high level of recent acquisition
activity means that evaluation of Trajen on the basis of
historical financial information is neither practical nor
particularly meaningful in that it is not reflective of the
business as acquired by us. However, we believe that the
performance of the Trajen sites has been and will continue to be
broadly comparable with the overall performance of our existing
Atlantic sites due to the similar nature of their respective
physical assets and target markets (corporate and individual
owners of jet aircraft), as well as similar financial
performance of comparably sized sites in recent years. If we had
owned Trajens 23 sites from the beginning of 2006, we have
estimated that the business would contribute $66 to
$70 million to our consolidated gross profit for the year.
We have also estimated that Trajen would generate an EBITDA to
gross profit margin in a range of 44% to 46%.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
For a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources with
respect to our Existing Businesses, please see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources in
our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources in our Current Reports on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on May 16, 2006 and June 27, 2006,
all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The
Gas Company
Cash
Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and
2005
Because TGCs cash flows are only included in our financial
results for a short period of 2006, the following analysis
compares the historical cash flows for TGC under its current and
prior owner. We believe that this is a more appropriate approach
to explaining the historical cash flow trends of TGC than
discussing the composition of the
24-day
period that is included in our consolidated cash flows.
S-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash provided by operations
|
|
$
|
11,211
|
|
|
$
|
11,618
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(260,207
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,376
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
$
|
255,450
|
|
|
$
|
(3,153
|
)
|
Key factors influencing cash flows from TGC were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the decrease in operating cash flows for the first half of 2006
was mainly the result of normal working capital fluctuations.
The key factors that drive operating cash flows include customer
receipts less purchases of fuel, materials and supplies, and
less payment of payroll and benefit costs, franchise and revenue
taxes, vendor services and administrative charges;
|
|
|
|
cash used in investing activities increased mainly due to our
acquisition of TGC; and
|
|
|
|
cash provided by financing activities increased due to
$160.0 million of new term debt incurred to finance the
purchase of TGC, $106.7 million of capital received from us
upon our acquisition of the business, and $2.0 million
drawn on TGCs revolving credit agreement to fund working
capital needs immediately following the acquisition.
|
At June 30, 2006, TGC had cash of $5.9 million and had
$18.0 million available to borrow under its
$20 million revolving credit facility. On July 7,
2006, TGC repaid the $2.0 million outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, restoring its available balance to
$20.0 million. A $1.0 million cash dividend was paid
to MIC Inc. on July 21, 2006.
For information on our gas production and distribution
business outstanding debt and credit facilities, see
Note 8, Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of
our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, which is
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
Cash
Flows for the Ten Months Ended April 30, 2006 Compared to
the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2005, and the Twelve
Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to the Eleven Months
Ended June 30, 2004
Cash
Flow Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flow provided by operating activities decreased from 2004
to 2005 and also from 2005 to 2006. These decreases were due
primarily to changes in working capital and deferred taxes. The
working capital changes resulted from increases in accounts
receivable due to higher billings and increased inventory levels
resulting from higher fuel prices and the timing of purchases of
LPG. The following table summarizes the impact of working
capital and deferred taxes, and of other items, on cash flow
from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
(August 8,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
2003) to
|
|
|
Average Per
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2006
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Impact of items other than working
capital and deferred taxes
|
|
|
$14,685
|
|
|
|
$1,468
|
|
|
|
$16,290
|
|
|
|
$1,357
|
|
|
|
$14,803
|
|
|
|
$1,346
|
|
Impact of working capital and
deferred taxes
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
5,129
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
$13,804
|
|
|
|
$1,380
|
|
|
|
$17,222
|
|
|
|
$1,435
|
|
|
|
$19,932
|
|
|
|
$1,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-53
Cash
Flow Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
Ten Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
(August 8,
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
2003) to
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing
activities
|
|
|
$(17,084
|
)
|
|
|
$(6,116
|
)
|
|
|
$(112,480
|
)
|
Cash flow used in investing activities principally consists of
capital expenditures. Cash flow used in investing activities for
the ten months ended April 30, 2006 consisted of a
$10.5 million advance to Focus-Up Holding, Ltd., an
affiliate of k1 Ventures Ltd., and capital expenditures. Capital
expenditures in the ten months ended April 30, 2006
consisted of $5.9 million for maintenance and routine asset
replacements and $758,000 for new business opportunities. The
$758,000 expended for new business opportunities comprised of
pipelines, meters and tanks for new customers that are expected
to generate annual revenue of about $590,000 in the utility
business and about $135,000 in the non-utility business,
beginning immediately following equipment installation.
For the twelve months ended June 30, 2005, cash flows used
in investing activities consisted of capital expenditures of
$5.2 million for maintenance and routine asset replacements
and $933,000 for new business opportunities. The $933,000
expended for new business opportunities comprised of pipelines,
meters and tanks for new customers that are expected to generate
annual revenue of about $675,000 in the utility business and
about $125,000 in the non-utility business, beginning
immediately following equipment installation.
Cash flow used in investing activities for the period from
inception to June 30, 2004 included $106.5 million
related to the purchase of the business by k1. Capital
expenditures for 2004 were $6.0 million, consisting of
$5.5 million for maintenance and routine asset replacements
and $499,000 for new business opportunities. The $499,000
expended for new business opportunities comprised pipelines,
meters and tanks for new customers that have generated annual
revenue of about $270,000 in the utility business and about
$81,000 in the non-utility business.
TGC expects to spend approximately $6.9 million for
maintenance and routine replacements of current facilities and
equipment in 2006, of which $4.6 million was incurred
through June 30, 2006. The remaining $2.3 million
comprises approximately $1.0 million for vehicles and
$1.3 million for other renewals and upgrades. TGC expects
to spend approximately $3.7 million in 2006 for capital
projects related to new business and for new capital projects
that are not routine maintenance or asset replacements, of which
$500,000 was incurred through June 30, 2006. The remaining
$3.2 million relates to new business, including new tanks
and meters, expansion of current facilities and improvement of
distribution system reliability and capacity.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, TGC currently
expects to incur approximately $10.0 million for capital
expenditures. This includes $6.1 million for capitalized
maintenance and routine replacements of current facilities and
equipment. The remaining $3.9 million includes
approximately $2.0 million in projects for the expansion of
facility capabilities and to improve distribution system
reliability and capacity, as well as $1.9 million for
growth of current facilities, consisting of $1.0 million
for regulated operations and $0.9 million for unregulated
operations.
Cash
Flow (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception
|
|
|
|
Ten Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
(August 8,
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
2003) to
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2006
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
$(58
|
)
|
|
|
$(5
|
)
|
|
|
$98,105
|
|
Cash flow used in financing activities in 2004 was primarily due
to k1s equity and debt financing for its purchase of the
business in 2003.
S-54
International-Matex
Tank Terminals
Cash
Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and
2005
The acquisition of our 50% interest in IMTT was completed on
May 1, 2006. The following analysis compares the historical
cash flows for IMTT under its current and prior owners. We
believe that this is a more appropriate approach to explaining
the historical cash flow trends of IMTT, rather than discussing
the cash flows from IMTT included in our consolidated cash flows
for the period from May 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operations
|
|
$
|
38,799
|
|
|
$
|
26,134
|
|
Cash flow used in investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(33,512
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,050
|
)
|
Cash flow provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
$
|
87,646
|
|
|
$
|
(11,198
|
)
|
Key factors influencing cash flow at IMTT were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
cash flow provided by operations increased due to an increase in
gross profit and a decrease in interest paid and a reduction in
working capital;
|
|
|
|
cash flow used in investing activities increased principally due
to high levels of specific capital expenditure relating to the
construction of the new facility at Geismar, LA and the
construction of new storage tanks at IMTTs existing
facility at St. Rose, LA; and
|
|
|
|
substantial cash flow was provided to IMTT from financing
activities as a result of our investment in IMTT net of
dividends paid to the existing shareholders of IMTT and
repayments of borrowings.
|
For information on IMTTs debt and credit facilities, see
Liquidity and Capital Resources Our
Consolidated Cash Flow IMTT Cash Flow in
Part 2 of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, which is
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
Pursuant to the terms of the shareholders agreement
between ourselves and the other shareholders in IMTT, all
shareholders in IMTT other than MIC are required to loan all
dividends received by them (excluding the $100.0 million
dividend paid to prior existing shareholders at the closing of
our investment in IMTT), net of tax payable in relation to such
dividends, through the quarter ending December 31, 2007
back to IMTT Holdings Inc. The shareholder loan will bear
interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.5% and is to be repaid
over 15 years by IMTT Holdings Inc. with equal quarterly
amortization commencing March 31, 2008. No shareholder
loans were outstanding as at June 30, 2006.
Cash
Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to the
Year Ended December 31, 2004, and the Year Ended
December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Cash
Flow Provided by Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operations
|
|
$
|
51,706
|
|
|
$
|
40,713
|
|
|
$
|
33,246
|
|
Cash flow provided by operations increased by 22.5% from 2003 to
2004 and 27% from 2004 to 2005 primarily due to increases in
gross profit.
Significant growth in terminal revenue and terminal gross profit
is expected over the period from 2006 through 2008 and it is
anticipated that this will have a corresponding positive impact
on cash flow from operations over the same period. In addition,
IMTT Holdings Inc., which files a consolidated U.S. federal
tax
S-55
return for IMTT, as at the end of 2005 had carried forward
federal tax net operating losses of approximately
$80.0 million. Thus it is anticipated that IMTT will not
pay any significant amounts of U.S. federal taxation over the
period from 2006 through 2008.
Cash
Flow Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow used in investing
activities
|
|
$
|
(37,090
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,559
|
)
|
Including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital
expenditure plant & equipment
|
|
$
|
(17,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,844
|
)
|
Maintenance capital
expenditure environmental
|
|
$
|
(2,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,430
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,788
|
)
|
Growth capital expenditure
|
|
$
|
(16,499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,895
|
)
|
Cash flow used in investing activities declined by
$13.9 million from 2004 to 2005 due to a decline in growth
capital expenditure that was partially offset by an increase in
maintenance capital expenditure (which includes capitalized
expenditures on existing plant and equipment maintenance and
environmental related expenditures). Growth capital expenditure
in 2005 related primarily to the ongoing tank capacity additions
at St. Rose and various other facility improvements. Growth
capital expenditure in 2004 related primarily to the acquisition
and refurbishment of a terminal adjoining IMTTs Bayonne
terminal and new boilers and pier modifications at Bayonne.
Cash flow used in investing activities increased by
$8.5 million from 2003 to 2004 due to a decline in
maintenance capital expenditure that was more than offset by an
increase in growth capital expenditure discussed in the
paragraph above. Growth capital expenditure in 2003 related
primarily to tank capacity additions at St. Rose and Bayonne and
new boilers and pipeline relocations at Bayonne.
Looking forward it is anticipated that total maintenance capital
expenditure (plant and equipment and environmental) is unlikely
to exceed a range of between $30.0 million and
$40.0 million per year and is expected to be below this
range for the 2006 full year due to the deferral of
environmental capital expenditure into subsequent periods. The
expected level of future maintenance capital expenditure over
the longer term primarily reflects the need for increased
environmental expenditures going forward both to remediate
existing sites and to upgrade waste water treatment and spill
containment infrastructure to comply with existing, and
currently foreseeable changes to, environmental regulations.
Future maintenance capital expenditure is expected to be funded
from IMTTs cash flow from operations.
Cash
Flow Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
$
|
(13,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,174
|
|
|
$
|
6,598
|
|
Cash flow provided by financing activities in 2003 and 2004
principally reflects the net debt funding required to finance
growth capital expenditure in those years. In 2005 growth
capital expenditures were lower than in prior years and the
excess of cash flow provided by operations over capital
expenditures was used to reduce debt and to make distributions
to shareholders of IMTT and advances to their affiliates.
Sources
of Funding for IMTTs Future Growth Capital Expenditure and
Dividend Policy
IMTT intends to undertake at the least approximately
$191.0 million of aggregate growth capital expenditure in
2006 and 2007.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, IMTT spent
$26.0 million on expansion projects, including
$12.5 million related to the construction of a new bulk
liquid chemical storage facility at Geismar and
$7.0 million related to the ongoing construction of new
storage tanks at IMTTs existing facility at St.
S-56
Rose. The balance of the growth capital expenditure related to a
number of smaller projects to improve the capabilities of
IMTTs facilities. IMTT has currently committed to
$171.0 million of growth capital expenditure during the
remainder of 2006 and 2007, including at least approximately
$148.0 million in relation to the construction of the
Geismar facility and $23.0 million in relation to the
construction of 15 new storage tanks at IMTTs existing
facilities in Louisiana.
It is anticipated that this growth capital expenditure and
IMTTs dividend payments during 2006 and 2007 as prescribed
in the shareholders agreement between us and the other
shareholders of IMTT Holdings will be fully funded using a
combination of IMTTs cash flow from operations,
IMTTs debt facilities, the proceeds from our investment in
IMTT (net of the $100.0 million dividend payment to
shareholders other than us) and future loans from the IMTT
shareholders other than us. IMTTs current debt facilities
will need to be refinanced on amended terms and increased in
size during 2006 and 2007 to provide the funding necessary for
IMTT to fully pursue its expansion plans. Pursuant to the terms
of the shareholders agreement, all shareholders in IMTT
other than us are required to loan all dividends received by
them (excluding the $100.0 million dividend), net of tax
payable in relation to such dividends, through the quarter
ending December 31, 2007 back to IMTT Holdings. The
shareholder loan will have a fixed interest rate of 5.5% and be
repaid over 15 years with equal quarterly amortization.
Airport
Services Business
Cash Flow
Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
The acquisition of Atlantic Aviation by Atlantic Aviation FBO
Inc., or Atlantic FBO Holdco (formerly known as North America
Capital Holding Company), was initially partially financed with
a $130 million bridge loan facility provided by the
Macquarie Group. This bridge facility was refinanced in October
2004 with a term loan facility of the same amount. The Macquarie
Group provided $52 million of the term loan facility.
Atlantic FBO Holdco made a prepayment of $1.5 million of
the term loan on December 31, 2004. MIC purchased AvPorts
with a $36.0 million senior loan in place that was drawn at
the time of the prior owners acquisition. On
January 14, 2005, Atlantic FBO Holdco completed its
acquisition of two FBOs in California. This acquisition was
partly funded through an increase in the term loan of
$32 million, which was provided by WestLB AG, New York
Branch.
On December 12, 2005, Atlantic FBO Holdco, the holding
company for MICs airport services business, entered into a
loan agreement providing for $300 million of term loan
borrowing and a $5 million revolving credit facility. On
December 14, 2005, Atlantic FBO Holdco drew down
$300 million in term loans and repaid the existing term
loans of $198.6 million (including accrued interest and
fees), increased its debt service reserve by $3.4 million
and paid $6.4 million in fees and expenses. Atlantic FBO
Holdco also utilized $2 million of the revolving credit
facility to issue letters of credit.
The counterparties to the agreement are Mizuho Corporate Bank
Limited, as administrative agent, and other lenders party
thereto. The Atlantic FBO Holdco term loan is an obligation of
the MIC Inc. operating subsidiaries that comprise its airport
services business and is non-recourse to MIC Inc. or its other
businesses. The obligations under the credit agreements are
secured by the assets of Atlantic FBO Holdco as well as the
equity interests of Atlantic FBO Holdco and its subsidiaries.
The terms and conditions for the facilities include events of
default and representations and warranties that are customary
for facilities of this type.
On June 28, 2006, Atlantic FBO Holdco entered into an
agreement to expand the existing $300 million term loan at
Atlantic FBO Holdco to $480 million. On July 11, 2006,
Atlantic FBO Holdco used the additional $180 million term
loan to partially fund the acquisition of Trajen.
Details of the Atlantic FBO Holdco term loan facility are as
follows:
|
|
|
Amount outstanding as of
September 30, 2006 |
|
$480 million term loan
$4.3 million in letters of credit drawn against the
$5 million revolving credit facility |
|
Term |
|
Matures December 12, 2010 |
S-57
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
Payable at maturity |
|
Interest rate type |
|
Floating |
|
Interest rate base |
|
LIBOR |
|
Interest rate margin |
|
1.75% until 2008
2.00% until 2010 |
|
Interest rate hedging |
|
We have fixed the interest rate of 100% of the term loan by
entering into interest rate swaps (fixed vs. LIBOR) at the
following average rates (not including interest margin): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start Date
|
|
End Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
Dec 14, 2005
|
|
Sep 28, 2007
|
|
$300 million
|
|
|
4.27%
|
|
Sep 28, 2007
|
|
Nov 7, 2007
|
|
$300 million
|
|
|
4.73%
|
|
Nov 7, 2007
|
|
Oct 21, 2009
|
|
$300 million
|
|
|
4.85%
|
|
Oct 21, 2009
|
|
Dec 14, 2010
|
|
$300 million
|
|
|
4.98%
|
|
Sep 29, 2006
|
|
Dec 12, 2010
|
|
$180 million
|
|
|
5.515%
|
|
|
|
|
Debt service reserve |
|
Six months of debt service |
|
Distributions
lock-up tests |
|
12-month
forward and
12-month
backward debt service cover ratio < 1.5x |
|
|
|
Minimum adjusted pro forma EBITDA:
|
Year
|
|
After expansion
|
|
2005
|
|
$40.1 million
|
2006
|
|
$66.9 million
|
2007
|
|
$71.9 million
|
2008
|
|
$77.5 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum debt/adjusted EBITDA calculated quarterly:
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum debt/
|
Starting
|
|
Ending
|
|
adjusted EBITDA
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
5.5x
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
|
5.0x
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
4.5x
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory prepayments |
|
If any distribution
lock-up test
is not met for two consecutive quarters. |
|
Events of default financial triggers |
|
If backward debt service cover ratio < 1.2x |
|
12-month
backward debt service cover ratio as at December 31, 2005 |
|
2.19x |
|
12-month
forward debt service cover ratio as at December 31, 2005 |
|
2.63x |
We do not intend to be in a position to repay the amount
outstanding under this facility at maturity as a result of our
dividend policy to distribute to shareholders available cash net
of prudent reserves. Therefore, we will need to refinance this
facility at or prior to its maturity. We have no reason to
believe at this time that we will not be able to refinance the
debt when due.
On July 11, 2006, MIC Inc. borrowed $180 million
against its acquisition credit facility to fund a portion of the
acquisition of Trajen. MIC expects to repay all of the
outstanding borrowings under this facility with the net proceeds
of this offering, and the net proceeds from the disposition of
the MICs investments in MCG and SEW and the anticipated
disposition of its investment in YLL.
S-58
Maintenance
Capital Expenditure
We expect to spend approximately $3.8 million at
Atlantics existing FBOs, or $200,000 per FBO, per
year on maintenance capital expenditure. At our newly acquired
Trajen FBOs we expect to spend approximately $3.3 million,
or $140,000 per FBO, per year on maintenance capital
expenditure. These amounts will be spent on items such as
repainting, replacing equipment as necessary and any ongoing
environmental or required regulatory expenditure, such as
installing safety equipment. This expenditure is funded from
cash flow from operations.
Maintenance capital expenditures associated with Trajen sites is
lower than the expected annual maintenance capital expenditures
for our existing Atlantic sites as a result of the significant
capital improvements made by Trajen prior to our acquisition.
Specific
Capital Expenditure
We intend to spend a total of approximately $12.4 million
at Atlantics existing FBOs on specific capital expenditure
in 2006 and 2007, which we intend to fund from then existing
resources. We expect to spend $850,000 on specific capital
expenditures in 2007 at our newly acquired Trajen FBOs, all of
which was pre-funded at acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost/Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining (from
|
Location
|
|
Item
|
|
Expected Timing
|
|
December 31, 2005)
|
|
Teterboro Airport
|
|
Ramp construction
|
|
Completion expected in the second
quarter of 2007
|
|
$
|
4.5 million
|
|
Metroport East 34th Street
Heliport
|
|
Upgrade of heliport in exchange
for ten-year operating agreement
|
|
Completion expected in the second
quarter of 2007
|
|
$
|
2.8 million
|
|
Pittsburgh International Airport
|
|
Original lease requires further
capital expenditure. This will be fulfilled through the
development of a new hangar.
|
|
Completion expected in the third
quarter of 2007
|
|
$
|
5.1 million
|
|
Tucson International Airport
|
|
Hangar construction
|
|
Completion expected by July 2007
|
|
$
|
850,000
|
|
Airport
Parking Business
Refinancing
of Credit Facility
On September 1, 2006, our airport parking business, or
PCAA, through a number of its majority-owned airport parking
subsidiaries, entered into a loan agreement providing for
$195.0 million of term loan borrowings. On
September 1, 2006, PCAA drew down $195.0 million and
repaid two of its existing term loans totaling
$184.0 million, paid interest expense of $1.9 million,
and paid fees and expenses of $4.9 million. PCAA also
released approximately $0.4 million from reserves in excess
of minimum liquidity and reserve requirements. The remaining
amount of the drawdown, approximately $4.6 million, will be
used to fund maintenance and specific capital expenditures of
the airport parking business.
The counterparty to the agreement is Capmark Finance Inc. The
obligations under the credit agreements are secured by the
assets of PCAA borrowing entities. The terms and conditions for
the facility include events of default and representations and
warranties that are customary for facilities of this type.
The loan has a term of three years plus two one-year options,
subject to our meeting certain covenants. The loan has an
interest rate of the
one-month
LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.90% for the first
S-59
three years and a margin of 2.10% and 2.30% in years four and
five, respectively. An existing rate cap at LIBOR equal to 4.48%
will remain in effect through October 15, 2008 with respect
to a notional amount of the loan of $58.7 million. We have
entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the
$136.3 million balance at 5.17%. The interest rate swap
covers the entire $195.0 million from October 16, 2008
through the maturity of the loan on September 1, 2009.
PCAAs obligations under the interest rate swap have been
guaranteed by MIC Inc.
Commitments
and Contingencies
For a summary of the future obligations of MIC Inc., the
U.S. holding company for our consolidated businesses, due by
period, under their various contractual obligations, off-balance
sheet arrangements and commitments, please see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Commitments and
Contingencies in Part II, Item 7 of our amended
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, and our amended Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, each of which
is incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
The
Gas Company
The following table summarizes the future obligations of TGC, by
period, as of June 30, 2006, under various contractual
obligations and commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
|
2009-2011
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
|
Minimum lease obligations(2)
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
7,867
|
|
Barge charter obligations(3)
|
|
|
4,691
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefits(4)
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
Pension benefit payments(5)
|
|
|
19,201
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
9,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
197,921
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
|
$
|
7,498
|
|
|
$
|
11,104
|
|
|
$
|
177,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The long-term debt represents TGCs obligations to its
various lenders. TGC borrowed $160.0 million in connection
with our acquisition of TGC. No principal payments are required
on this debt until 2013. |
|
(2) |
|
TGC is obligated under non-cancelable real-estate operating
leases with terms longer than one year. The amounts represent
the minimum annual rental payments required to be paid in
connection with these leases. |
|
(3) |
|
TGC has a five-year time charter agreement with Sause Brothers
for the use of two LPG barges that it uses to carry LPG from
Oahu to the islands of Hawaii, Maui and Kauai. TGC can terminate
the charter after two years without penalty. The amounts
represent the minimum charter payments under the agreement if
TGC chartered for the entire five-year term. TGC is also
obligated to pay certain operating costs in connection with the
charter hire. These costs, which are based on utilization of the
barges, comprise principally port, dockage and towage charges. |
|
(4) |
|
TGC is obligated to pay post-retirement medical costs for
employees that were part of its union labor force prior to
retirement. The amounts include the estimated cash payments for
these benefits. |
|
(5) |
|
Certain of TGCs employees belong to a pension plan. The
amounts include the estimated benefit payments for this pension
plan. See Note 3, Significant Accounting Policies, to our
consolidated condensed financial statements in Part I,
Item I of our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, incorporated by
reference into this prospectus supplement, for further
information on the TGC pension plan. |
S-60
Acquisition
Credit Facility
On May 9, 2006, MIC Inc., the holding company for our
U.S. businesses, amended the revolving portion of its
acquisition credit facility, originally entered into on
November 11, 2005, pursuant to which the commitments under
the acquisition credit facility were increased to provide for a
$300.0 million revolving credit facility and a term loan of
$180.0 million through March 31, 2008 with Citicorp
North America Inc. (as lender and administrative agent),
Citibank, N.A., Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, Credit
Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch and Macquarie Bank Limited. The
term loan portion of the acquisition credit facility is being
repaid in full with the net proceeds of this offering and may
not be reborrowed. We intend to continue to use the revolving
portion of the acquisition credit facility to fund acquisitions,
capital expenditures and to a limited extent working capital,
pending refinancing through equity offerings at an appropriate
time. Under the terms of the acquisition credit facility, any
borrowings incurred to finance acquisitions must first be made
under the revolving portion of the facility except to the extent
there is availability under the $30.0 million working
capital sublimit under the acquisition credit facility. MIC
Inc.s obligations under the acquisition credit facility
are guaranteed by us and secured by a pledge of the equity of
all of our and MIC Inc.s current and future direct
subsidiaries.
The interest margin under the facility is LIBOR plus 2.00% or a
base rate plus 1.00%, increasing by 0.50% in November 2006 and
again in May 2007, up to a maximum of 3.00% and 2.00%,
respectively. The current margin on outstanding borrowings is
LIBOR plus 2.00%. Once the term loan borrowings have been repaid
in full or the term loan commitments have otherwise terminated,
the interest rate on the acquisition facility will decrease to
LIBOR plus 1.25% or the base rate plus 0.25%.
We expect to repay all of the outstanding borrowings under this
facility with the net proceeds from this offering and the
anticipated disposition of our investment in YLL. After giving
effect to the application of the estimated net proceeds of this
offering of approximately $215.5 million as set forth under
Use of Proceeds in this prospectus supplement, we
would have approximately $227.4 million of availability
under our revolving credit facility.
The terms and conditions for the revolving facility include
events of default and representations and warranties that are
generally customary for a facility of this type. In addition,
the revolving facility includes an event of default should the
Manager or another affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited cease to
act as manager.
Details of the amended acquisition credit facility are as
follows:
|
|
|
Facility size: |
|
$300 million revolving facility for loans
and/or
letters of credit $180 million term loan |
|
Term: |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Interest and principal repayments: |
|
Interest only during the term of the loan. Repayment of
principal at maturity, upon voluntary prepayment, or upon an
event requiring mandatory prepayment. |
|
Eurodollar rate: |
|
LIBOR plus
2.00% per annum, which increases by 0.50% in November 2006
and again in May 2007, up to a maximum of 3.00%
|
|
|
|
Rate
decreases to LIBOR plus 1.25% upon term loan repayment or other
termination of commitments
|
|
Base rate: |
|
Base rate
plus 1.00% per annum, which increases by 0.50% in November
2006 and again in May 2007, up to a maximum of 2.00%
|
|
|
|
Rate
decreases to base rate plus 0.25% upon term loan repayment or
other termination of commitments
|
S-61
|
|
|
Commitment fees: |
|
0.20% of
applicable LIBOR margin per annum on undrawn portion (initially
0.40%)
|
|
Financial Covenants: |
|
Maximum
leverage ratio is increased to < 6.8:1 through the end of
2006, declining to < 6.1:1 through March 31, 2008,
returning to < 5.6:1 upon term loan repayment or termination
of commitments
|
|
|
|
Ratio of
MIC Inc. plus MIC LLC Interest Expense to Consolidated Adjusted
Cash from Operations > 2:1
|
|
|
|
Restriction
on incurrence of additional debt at the company or MIC Inc.
level prior to term loan repayment or termination of commitments
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
relating to our existing businesses and investments, see
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, and Item 3 Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our
amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, each of which
is incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since
August 9, 2006, our original
Form 10-Q
filing date.
S-62
BUSINESS
General
We own, operate and hold investments in a diversified group of
infrastructure businesses primarily in the United States. We
believe our infrastructure businesses, which offer basic
everyday services, have a sustainable and stable cash flow
profile and offer the potential for capital growth.
Traditionally, infrastructure businesses have been owned by
governments or private investors or have formed part of
vertically integrated companies. By owning shares of our trust
stock, investors have an opportunity to participate directly in
the ownership of these businesses.
Our new businesses, all of which we acquired in the last six
months, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
The Gas Company, a gas production and distribution business in
Hawaii;
|
|
|
|
a 50% ownership interest in IMTT Holdings, the owner/operator of
a bulk liquid storage terminal business, IMTT; and
|
|
|
|
Trajen Holdings, which owns and operates 23 fixed base
operations, or FBOs, that are being integrated into our existing
airport services business, Atlantic Aviation.
|
Our existing businesses consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Aviation, an airport services business that operates 19
FBOs in the United States;
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Parking, an off-airport parking business; and
|
|
|
|
a district energy business, conducted through Thermal Chicago
and Northwind Aladdin.
|
In August 2006, we disposed of our investment in MCG and in
October 2006, we disposed of our 17.5% interest in the holding
company that owns SEW. Additionally, in August 2006, we entered
into an agreement to dispose of our interest in the holding
company that owns 50% of the company that operates YLL. In
September 2006, our 50% partner in this holding company
exercised their
pre-emptive
rights over our interest. We expect this transaction to close by
the end of February 2007.
Our
Manager
Our Manager, a member of the Macquarie Group, is responsible for
our
day-to-day
operations and affairs and actively oversees the management
teams of our operating businesses. Together with its
subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide, the Macquarie Group
provides specialist investment, advisory, trading and financial
services in select markets around the world. The Macquarie Group
is a global leader in advising on the acquisition, disposition,
management and financing of infrastructure assets and the
management of infrastructure investment vehicles on behalf of
third-party investors.
Neither the trust nor the company have or will have any
employees. Our Manager has the right to assign, or second, to
the company, on a permanent and wholly dedicated basis,
employees as chief executive officer and chief financial officer
and it makes other personnel available as required. The services
performed for the company are provided at our Managers
expense, including the compensation of our seconded officers.
Our Managers active involvement in the operation of each
of our businesses enables our operational management teams to
benefit from the Macquarie Groups extensive industry
experience and regulatory knowledge, as well as its expertise in
identifying, valuing and financing the acquisition of
infrastructure assets. This relationship enables the operational
management teams to focus on expanding and strengthening the
operations of their respective businesses. Our acquisition
opportunities are identified largely by the Macquarie
Groups more than 400 personnel in various advisory roles
around the world. In addition, we can access the experience and
expertise of the more than 480 people who manage the
infrastructure businesses and investments to improve the
performance and to optimize the capital structure of those
businesses. The Macquarie Groups focus on infrastructure
has produced annualized returns to investors of 17.8% as of
June 30, 2006, since its first infrastructure entity was
listed in December of 1996.
S-63
We pay our Manager a base management fee based primarily on our
market capitalization. In addition, to incentivize our Manager
to maximize shareholder returns, we may pay performance fees.
Our Manager can earn a performance fee equal to 20% of the
outperformance, if any, of quarterly total returns to our
shareholders above a weighted average of two benchmark indices,
a U.S. utilities index and a European utilities index,
weighted in proportion to our U.S. and
non-U.S. equity
investments. To be eligible for the performance fee, our Manager
must deliver total shareholder returns for the quarter that are
positive, in excess of the benchmark and in excess of any prior
underperformance. For more information about our Manager and the
management services agreement, please see Our
Manager beginning on page 9 of the accompanying
prospectus.
Industry
Our infrastructure businesses provide basic, everyday services
to customers. We focus on the ownership and operation of
infrastructure businesses in the following categories:
|
|
|
|
|
User Pays Assets. These assets are
generally transportation-related infrastructure that depend on a
per use system for their main revenue source. Demand for use of
these assets is relatively unaffected by macroeconomic
conditions because people use these types of assets on an
everyday basis. User pays assets, such as airports,
are generally owned by government entities in the United States.
Other types of user pays assets, such as airport-
and rail-related infrastructure, off-airport parking and bulk
liquid storage terminals are typically owned by the private
sector. Where the private sector owner has been granted a lease
or concession by a government entity to operate the business,
the business will be subject to restrictions and other
provisions contained in the lease or concession.
|
|
|
|
Contracted Assets. These assets
provide services through long-term contracts with other
businesses or governments. These contracts typically can be
renewed on comparable terms when they expire because there are
no or a limited number of providers of similar services.
Contracted assets, such as district energy systems and
contracted power generation plants, are generally owned by the
private sector in the United States. Where the private sector
owner has been granted a lease or concession by a government
entity to operate the business, the business will be subject to
restrictions and other provisions contained in the lease or
concession.
|
|
|
|
Regulated Assets. Businesses that
own these assets are the sole or predominant providers of
essential services in their service areas and, as a result, are
typically regulated by government entities with respect to the
level of revenue earned or charges imposed. Government-regulated
revenues typically enable the service provider to cover
operating costs, depreciation and taxes and achieve an adequate
return on debt and equity capital invested. Electric
transmission and gas production and distribution networks are
examples of regulated assets. In the United States, regulated
assets are generally owned by publicly listed utilities,
although some are owned by government entities.
|
By their nature, businesses in these categories generally have
sustainable and growing long-term cash flows due to consistent
customer demand and the businesses strong competitive
positions. Consistent customer demand is driven by the basic,
everyday nature of the services provided. The strong competitive
position results from high barriers to entry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
high initial development and construction costs, such as the
cost of cooling equipment and distribution pipes for district
energy systems and the distribution network for our gas
production and distribution business;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining suitable land, such as land near or at
airports for parking facilities or FBOs or waterfront land near
key ports of entry for bulk liquid storage terminals;
|
|
|
|
long-term concessions and customer contracts, such as FBO leases
and contracts for cooling services to buildings;
|
S-64
|
|
|
|
|
required government approvals, which may be difficult or
time-consuming to obtain, such as approvals to lay pipes under
city streets; and
|
|
|
|
lack of cost-effective alternatives to the services provided by
these businesses in the foreseeable future, as is the case with
district energy.
|
These barriers to entry have the effect of protecting the
revenue generated by the infrastructure assets owned by these
businesses. These barriers to entry exist because services
provided by infrastructure businesses, such as parking, gas
production and distribution, and bulk liquid storage, can
generally only be delivered by relatively large and costly
physical assets in close proximity to customers. These services
cannot be delivered over the internet, and cannot be outsourced
to other countries, and are therefore not susceptible to the
competitive pressures that other industries, including
manufacturing industries, typically face. We will not seek to
acquire infrastructure businesses that face significant
competition, such as merchant electricity generation facilities.
The prices charged for the use of, and accordingly, the revenue
generated by, infrastructure assets can generally be expected to
keep pace with inflation. User pays assets typically
enjoy pricing power in their market due to consistent demand and
limited competition, the contractual terms of contracted assets
typically allow for price increases, and the regulatory process
that determines revenues for regulated assets typically provides
for inflation and cost pass-through adjustments.
Infrastructure assets, especially newly constructed assets, tend
to be long-lived, require predictable maintenance capital
expenditures and are generally not subject to major
technological change or rapid physical deterioration. This
generally means that significant cash flow is available from
infrastructure businesses to service debt, make distributions to
shareholders and renew and expand the business.
The sustainable and growing long-term cash flows of
infrastructure assets mean their capital structures can
typically support more debt than other businesses. Our ability
to optimize the capital structure of our businesses is a key
component in maximizing returns to investors.
Strategy
We intend to deliver increasing value to shareholders through
two initiatives. First, we are growing our existing businesses
by pursuing revenue growth and gross operating income
improvement, optimizing the financing structure of our
businesses and improving the performance and the competitive
position of our controlled businesses through complementary
acquisitions. Second, we will continue to acquire businesses we
believe will provide yield accretive returns in infrastructure
sectors other than those in which our businesses currently
operate. We believe our association with the Macquarie Group is
key to the successful execution of our strategy.
Operational
Strategy
We rely on the Macquarie Groups demonstrated expertise and
experience in the management of infrastructure businesses to
execute our operational strategy. In managing infrastructure
businesses, the Macquarie Group endeavors to (1) recruit
and support talented operational management teams,
(2) instill disciplined financial management consistently
across the businesses, (3) source and execute complementary
acquisitions, and (4) structure and arrange debt financing
for the businesses to maximize returns to shareholders.
We plan to increase the cash generated by our businesses through
initiatives to increase revenues and improve gross operating
income. We have in place seasoned management teams at each of
our businesses who are supported by the demonstrated
infrastructure management expertise and experience of the
Macquarie Group in the execution of this strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
Improving and expanding our existing marketing
programs. We expect to continue to enhance the
client services and marketing programs of our businesses.
Sophisticated marketing programs relative to those of most other
industry participants exist within certain of our businesses,
such
|
S-65
|
|
|
|
|
as our airport parking and airport services businesses. We
intend to expand these programs and extend them to facilities
that we acquire within those businesses in the future.
Additionally, we expect that centralizing the capital management
and acquisition-related activities of our businesses will enable
operating company managers to increase their focus on enhancing
marketing efforts and other operating improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Making selective capital expenditures. We
expect to continue to make selected capital expenditures to
expand capacity of our existing businesses and improve their
facilities, which we believe will generate additional revenues,
EBITDA and cash available for distribution in the short-term.
Anticipated capital expenditures through 2007 include capacity
expansions of, and facility improvements to, our airport
services business, district energy business, gas production and
distribution business and bulk liquid storage terminal business.
We generally strive to manage maintenance capital expenditures
to keep our assets well-maintained and to avoid any
unanticipated maintenance costs over the life of the assets.
|
|
|
|
Strengthening our competitive position through complementary
acquisitions. We intend to continue to grow our
businesses by selectively acquiring and integrating
yield-accretive, complementary acquisitions identified by the
Macquarie Group. We believe that complementary acquisitions will
improve our overall performance by: (1) leveraging our
brand and marketing programs, particularly in our airport
services and airport parking businesses; (2) taking
advantage of the size and diversification of our businesses to
achieve lower financing costs; and (3) allowing us to
realize synergies and implement improved management practices
across a larger number of operations. The acquisition of Trajen
and the Las Vegas FBO by our airport services business, and the
acquisition of eight additional off-airport parking facilities
during 2005 by our airport parking business, are examples of
this strategy.
|
Acquisition
Strategy
We expect our acquisition strategy to benefit from the Macquarie
Groups deep knowledge and ability to identify acquisition
opportunities in the infrastructure area. We believe it is often
the case that infrastructure opportunities are not widely
offered, well-understood or properly valued. The Macquarie Group
has significant expertise in the execution of such acquisitions,
which can be time-consuming and complex, and through its
extensive contacts in this sector has access to information
about potential acquisitions.
We intend to acquire infrastructure businesses and investments
in sectors other than those sectors in which our businesses
currently operate, provided we believe we can achieve yield
accretive returns. Our acquisition of TGC is an example of this
strategy. While our focus is on acquiring businesses in the
United States, we may also consider opportunities in other
developed countries. Generally, we will seek to acquire
controlling interests, but we may acquire minority positions in
attractive sectors where those acquisitions generate immediate
dividends and where our partners have objectives similar to our
own. Our acquisition of our interest in IMTT is consistent with
this philosophy.
Our New
Businesses
The
Gas Company
Our
Acquisition
On June 7, 2006, through our wholly owned subsidiary,
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Inc., we completed the
acquisition of 100% of the stock of K-1 HGC Investment, L.L.C.
(subsequently renamed Macquarie HGC Investment LLC), which owns
HGC Holdings, L.L.C. (subsequently renamed HGC Holdings LLC),
and The Gas Company, LLC from k1 Ventures Limited. The cost of
the acquisition, including working capital adjustments and
transaction costs, was $272.0 million, pending final
agreement on the working capital adjustment.
S-66
Business
Overview
Founded in 1904, TGC is Hawaiis only franchised
full-service gas energy company, making gas products and
services available in Hawaii. The Hawaiian market includes
Hawaiis 1.2 million full-time residents and over
seven million annual visitors. TGC provides both regulated and
unregulated gas distribution services on the six primary islands
in the state of Hawaii.
TGC has approximately 90% of the states overall gas
market, comprising all of the regulated market, and
approximately 77% of the non-regulated gas market. TGC has two
products, synthetic natural gas, or SNG, and liquefied petroleum
gas, or LPG. Both products are relatively clean-burning fuels
that produce lower levels of harmful emissions than coal or oil.
This is particularly important in Hawaii where environmental
regulations exceed Federal Environmental Protection Agency
standards and lower emissions make our products attractive to
customers.
SNG and LPG have a wide number of commercial and residential
applications, including electricity generation, water heating,
drying, cooking, and gas lighting. LPG is also used as a fuel
for some specialty vehicles and forklifts. Gas customers range
from residential customers to a wide variety of commercial
customers.
TGC sales are stable and have demonstrated resilience even
during downturns in the tourism industry (as measured by visitor
arrivals) and fluctuations in the general economic environment.
Although the HPUC sets the base price for SNG and LPG sold by
our regulated business, TGC is permitted to charge customers a
fuel adjustment charge that can be adjusted monthly. Therefore,
the profitability of the business enjoys some protection from
feedstock price changes due to TGCs ability to recover
increasing feedstock costs by adjusting the rates charged to its
regulated customers.
TGC has two primary businesses, utility (or regulated) and
non-utility (or unregulated):
|
|
|
|
|
The utility business includes distribution and sales of SNG on
the island of Oahu and distribution and sale of LPG to
approximately 35,850 customers through localized distribution
systems located on the islands of Oahu, Hawaii, Maui, Kauai,
Molokai and Lanai (listed by size of market with Oahu being the
largest). Utility revenue consists principally of sales of
thermal units, or therms, of SNG and gallons of LPG. One gallon
of LPG is the equivalent of 0.913 therms. The operating costs
for the utility business include the cost of locally purchased
feedstock, the cost of manufacturing SNG from the feedstock, LPG
purchase costs and the cost of distributing SNG and LPG to
customers.
|
|
|
|
The non-utility business comprises the sale of LPG to
approximately 31,550 customers, through truck deliveries to
individual tanks located on customer sites on Oahu, Hawaii,
Maui, Kauai, Molokai and Lanai. Non-utility revenue consists of
sales of gallons of LPG. The operating costs for the non-utility
business include the cost of purchased LPG and the cost of
distributing the LPG to customers.
|
TGC provides either SNG or LPG to approximately 35,850 regulated
customers, comprising approximately 60% of TGCs total
revenue. TGCs unregulated customer base is comprised of
approximately 31,550 customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Volume (therms)
|
|
|
|
(per calendar year,
|
|
|
|
in thousands)(1)
|
|
Type
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Regulated SNG & LPG
|
|
|
17,536
|
|
|
|
34,250
|
|
|
|
34,241
|
|
Unregulated LPG
|
|
|
12,868
|
|
|
|
24,816
|
|
|
|
23,473
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Sales Revenue
|
|
|
|
(per calendar year)
|
|
Location
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Oahu
|
|
|
62%
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
Neighbor Islands
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Sales Revenue
|
|
|
|
(per calendar year)
|
|
Customer Type
|
|
2006(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
Commercial & Industrial
|
|
|
77%
|
|
|
|
78%
|
|
|
|
77%
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
TGC tracks its regulated business using Therms; 1 Therm is the
equivalent of 100,000 British Thermal Units and is the
equivalent of 0.913 gallons. |
|
(2) |
|
From January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006. |
Strategy
We believe that TGC will continue to generate stable cash flows
and revenue due to its established customer base and its strong
competitive position in Hawaii. Additionally, we believe that
TGC can increase its customer base, and accordingly, its revenue
and generated cash by (1) focusing on new opportunities
arising from growth in Hawaiis population, economy and
tourism industry, and (2) increasing the value of
TGCs products and its perceived attractiveness as an
alternative to other energy sources such as other LPG suppliers
and Hawaiis electric utilities.
Focus on growth opportunities arising from growth in
Hawaiis population, economy and tourism
industry. We consider growth of Hawaiis
population and economy to present opportunities to increase
TGCs base of non-regulated residential and commercial
customers of LPG. TGC intends to take advantage of growth in
Hawaiis tourism and real estate industries by pursuing new
customer relationships with hotel and condominium developers.
Increase TGCs attractiveness as an alternative to other
LPG suppliers and Hawaiis electric
utilities. We intend to invest in selected
capital expenditures, such as improvements to TGCs
distribution system and increases in TGCs LPG storage
capacity or supplies. We believe that these capital expenditures
will increase the reliability of TGCs distribution system
and will enhance TGCs attractiveness as an alternative to
Hawaiis regulated electric utilities and other
non-regulated LPG suppliers. Additionally, we intend to use
higher value-added solutions for customers and to continue to
market TGC as an environmentally friendly alternative to
electricity generation and as an established, reliable and
cost-effective distributor of LPG.
Products
Natural gas comprises a mixture of hydrocarbons, mostly methane,
that is generally derived from wells drilled into underground
reservoirs of porous rock. Hawaii relies solely on manufactured
and imported alternatives because the state does not have any
natural gas resources.
Synthetic Natural Gas. TGC catalytically
converts a light hydrocarbon feedstock (currently naphtha) to
SNG. The product is chemically similar in most respects to
natural gas. SNG may be substituted for, or interchanged with,
pipeline-quality natural gas, having the similar heating value
as natural gas on a cubic foot basis. TGC has the only SNG
manufacturing capability in Hawaii at its plant located on the
island of Oahu.
TGC is the only distributor in Hawaii of SNG, which it provides
to regulated customers through its transmission and distribution
system on Oahu. As with natural gas, SNG is delivered from a
centralized plant to customers via underground pipelines.
Liquefied Petroleum Gas. LPG is a generic name
for a mixture of hydrocarbon gases, most typically propane and
butane. Owing to its chemical properties, which result in LPG
becoming liquid at atmospheric
S-68
temperature and elevated pressure, LPG may be stored or
transported more easily than natural or synthetic natural gas.
LPG is typically transported using cylinders or tanks. Domestic
and commercial applications of LPG are similar to those of
natural and synthetic natural gas.
Utility
Regulation
TGCs utility operations are regulated by the HPUC, while
TGCs non-utility operations are not. The HPUC, a
three-person decision-making body appointed by the Governor of
the State of Hawaii, exercises broad regulatory oversight and
investigative authority over all public utility companies doing
business in the state of Hawaii.
Rate Regulation. The HPUC currently regulates
the rates that TGC can charge its utility customers via cost of
service regulation. Cost of service regulation allows TGC to set
rates in order to recover the reasonable and prudent costs of
providing utility gas service, including operating costs, taxes,
and a return of and on the capital it has invested.
TGCs rates are established by the HPUC in periodic rate
cases, initiated by TGC when it has the need to do so, which
historically has occurred approximately every five years. TGC
initiates a rate case by submitting a request to the HPUC for an
increase in the rates based, for example, upon materially higher
costs related to providing the service. The HPUC and the Hawaii
Division of Consumer Advocacy, or DCA, may also initiate a rate
case, although such proceedings have been relatively rare in
Hawaii and will generally only occur if the HPUC or DCA receive
numerous complaints about the rates being charged or if there is
a concern that TGC may be earning a greater than authorized rate
of return on investment for an extended period of time.
During the rate approval process, TGC must demonstrate that, at
its current rates and using a forward projected test year, its
revenue will not provide a reasonable opportunity to recover
costs and obtain a fair return on its investment. Following
submission by the DCA and other interested parties of their
positions on the rate request, the HPUC issues a decision
establishing the revenue requirements and the resulting rates
that TGC will be allowed to charge. This decision relies on
statutes, rules, regulations, prior precedent and
well-recognized ratemaking principles. The HPUC is statutorily
required to issue an interim decision on a rate case application
within a certain time period, generally within 11 months
following application, depending on the circumstances and
subject to TGCs compliance with procedural requirements.
In addition to formal rate cases, tariff changes and capital
additions are also approved by the HPUC.
This rate approval process is intended to ensure that a public
utility has a reasonable opportunity to recover costs that are
prudently incurred and earn a fair return on its investments,
while protecting consumer interests. The most recent TGC rate
case, resulting in a 9.9% increase, was approved by the HPUC in
May 2002. The next rate case could be initiated by TGC as early
as the fourth quarter of 2008 and new rates, if approved, could
be implemented in the second quarter of 2009. As permitted by
the HPUC, increases in TGCs gas feedstock costs since the
last rate case have been passed through to customers via a
monthly fuel adjustment charge.
Rates. TGCs rates for the regulated
business, as approved by the HPUC in 2002, excluding fuel
adjustment charge amounts, are set forth below:
Overview
of Rates/Therms by Customer Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly
|
|
|
Range of Rates
|
|
|
Medium
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Customer Category(1)
|
|
Base Charge
|
|
|
per Therm(2)
|
|
|
Off-Take Therms
|
|
|
Contract Therm
|
|
|
General Service
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.65 - $3.55
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
2.11 - $2.95
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Multi-Unit Residential
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.10 - $1.60
|
|
|
|
75 therms
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Commercial/Industrial
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.12 - $1.60
|
|
|
|
75 therms
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Large Firm
|
|
$
|
500.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.97 - $1.22
|
|
|
|
3,000 therms
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
S-69
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Additional customer categories exist on the island of Oahu, such
as Large Industrial, Large Firm, Alternate Energy, Standby, and
Interruptable. |
|
(2) |
|
The range of rates within a customer category vary by island
location and level of consumption, with rates in the General
Service, Multi-Unit Residential, Commercial/Industrial and Large
Firm categories declining as purchased therms increase above
prescribed thresholds. |
Competition
Regulated Business. TGC currently holds the
only franchise for regulated gas services in Hawaii. This
enables it to utilize public easements for distribution systems.
This franchise provides some protection from competition within
the same gas-energy sector since TGC has developed and owns an
extensive below-ground distribution infrastructure. The costs
associated with developing a distribution infrastructure are
significant. However, gas products can be stored in above-ground
tanks, and TGCs regulated customers, in most instances,
have the ability to move to unregulated gas with TGC or its
competitors by using LPG tanks.
Since electricity has similar markets and uses, TGCs
regulated business also competes with electric utilities in
Hawaii. Hawaiis electricity is generated by electric
utilities and various non-utility generators. Non-utility
generators, such as agricultural producers, can enter into power
purchase agreements with electric utilities or others to sell
excess power that is generated but not used by the non-utility
business. Most of Hawaiis electricity is sold to consumers
by the four regulated utilities: Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.
(serves the island of Oahu); Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc.
(serves the island of Hawaii); Kauai Island Utility Cooperative
(serves the island of Kauai); and Maui Electric Company, Ltd.
(serves the islands of Maui, Molokai and Lanai).
Unregulated Business. TGC also sells LPG in an
unregulated market in the six primary islands of Hawaii. Of the
largest 250 non-utility customers, over 90% have multi-year
supply contacts, with a weighted average life of almost three
years and which expire in various years through 2013. There are
two other wholesale companies and several small retail
distributors that share the LPG market, the largest of which is
AmeriGas. TGC has a competitive advantage due to its established
account base, storage facilities, distribution network and
reputation for reliable, cost-effective service. Depending upon
the end-use, the unregulated business also competes with
electricity, diesel and solar energy providers. Historically,
TGCs sales have been stable and somewhat insulated from
downturns in the economic environment and tourism activity. This
business comprises approximately 46% of TGCs revenue. No
single account comprises more than 1% of total revenue.
Fuel
Supply, SNG Plant and Distribution System
TGC obtains its LPG and raw feedstock for SNG production from
two oil refineries located on the island of Oahu, the Tesoro and
Chevron refineries, and from foreign imports. TGC owns the
dedicated pipelines, storage and infrastructure to handle this
supply and the resulting volumes of gas. LPG is supplied to
TGCs non-Oahu customers by barge.
S-70
TGCs storage capacities, as of June 30, 2006,
excluding product contained in transmission lines and tanks that
are on customer premises, are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
(thousands of
|
|
Island
|
|
LPG Gallons)
|
|
|
Oahu
|
|
|
230
|
|
Maui
|
|
|
592
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
852
|
|
Kauai
|
|
|
493
|
|
Molokai/Lanai
|
|
|
8
|
|
Barges
|
|
|
1,081
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Short-term storage.
Regulated Business. TGC manufactures SNG by
converting naphtha, purchased from Tesoro, in its SNG plant. The
plant is located in Campbell Industrial Park, about
22 miles west of the Honolulu business district. The SNG
plant configuration is effectively two production units, thereby
providing redundancy and ensuring continuous and adequate
supply. A propane air unit provides backup in the event of a SNG
plant shutdown. The SNG plant operates continuously with only a
15% seasonal variation in production and operates well within
its design capacity of 150,000 Therms per day. We believe that
as of June 7, 2006 the SNG plant has, with an appropriate
level of maintenance capital investment, an estimated remaining
economic life of approximately 20 years and that the
economic life of the plant is further extendable with additional
capital investment.
The SNG plant receives feedstock and fuel from the Tesoro
refinery under a ten-year Petroleum Feedstock Agreement, or PFA,
dated October 31, 1997. The PFA includes a ten-year
automatic renewal provision, unless the contract is cancelled by
either party 90 days prior to the end of the initial term.
TGC expects that the PFA will be renewed in the normal course of
business. The contract provides for a maximum quantity of
3.3 million Therms per month. When adjusted for the thermal
efficiency of the plant, it equates to approximately
35 million Therms per year of SNG production. The PFA is
more than adequate to meet the needs of the SNG plant. In 2005,
the SNG plant produced approximately 29 million Therms,
which equates to approximately 45% of all gas (both LPG and SNG)
supplied on all the islands of Hawaii.
A 22-mile
transmission line links the SNG plant to a distribution system
that ends in south Oahu. The pipeline is predominately
sixteen-inch transmission piping and is utilized only on Oahu to
move SNG from the Campbell Industrial Park to Pier 38 near the
financial district in Honolulu. This line also serves as a
short-term, 45-thousand Therm storage facility. Thereafter, a
pipeline distribution system consisting of approximately
900 miles of transmission, distribution and service
pipelines takes the gas to customers. Additionally, LPG is
trucked and shipped by barge to holder tanks on Oahu and
neighboring islands to be distributed via pipelines to utility
customers that are not connected to the Oahu SNG pipeline
system. Approximately 90% of TGCs pipeline system is on
Oahu.
Unregulated Business. The non-utility business
serves gas customers that are not connected to the TGC utility
pipeline system. The LPG acquired from the Oahu refineries and
foreign imports is distributed to neighboring island customers
utilizing two LPG-dedicated barges exclusively time-chartered by
a third party, harbor pipelines, trucks, several holder
facilities and storage base-yards on Kauai, Maui and Hawaii.
S-71
TGC is the only unregulated LPG provider in Hawaii that has
three sources of LPG supply. These sources are:
|
|
|
|
|
Chevron: TGC purchases approximately
18 million gallons of LPG annually from Chevrons
Campbell Industrial Park refinery. This is over 70 percent
of Chevrons LPG production, amounting to approximately
26 percent of total gas supplied in Hawaii.
|
|
|
|
Tesoro: TGC also purchases approximately
9 million gallons of LPG annually from Tesoros
Campbell Industrial Park refinery under an evergreen agreement.
The contract provides for a minimum quantity, but no maximum
quantity limitation. TGC purchases virtually all of
Tesoros LPG production, which is about 14% of the total
Hawaii LPG supply.
|
|
|
|
Foreign Suppliers: TGC buys LPG from foreign
suppliers to supplement locally sourced LPG. The company
typically purchases between two to four cargos per year. These
purchases are foreign sourced because there are no U.S. LPG
vessels that are available to bring LPG to Hawaii from the
U.S. mainland.
|
The Jones
Act
The barges transporting LPG between Oahu and its neighbor
islands must comply with the requirements of the Jones Act
(Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920). TGC
currently has the use of two Jones Act-qualified barges, having
the capability of transporting 424,000 gallons and 657,000
gallons of LPG, respectively, under a time charter arrangement
with Sause Brothers, Inc. Because these barges are important to
TGCs operations and must remain Jones Act-qualified, TGC
has the option to purchase the barges and can assign this right
to third parties.
Because there are no Jones Act-qualified ships transporting LPG
in the Pacific, TGC purchases between two and four cargos of LPG
from foreign sources per year. Foreign tankers are permitted to
carry LPG that originates outside of Hawaii to one or more ports
within the state.
The two Jones Act-qualified barges used by TGC are near the end
of their useful economic lives, and TGC intends to replace one
or both barges in the near future.
Employees
and Management
As of June 30, 2006, TGC had 317 employees, of which 210
were represented by the Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers
Union, Local 996 (the Union). The current Teamsters
collective bargaining agreement became effective May 1,
2004 and ends on April 30, 2008. This contract is expected
to be renegotiated near the end of the contract. TGC and the
Union have had a good relationship and there have been no major
disruptions in operations due to labor matters for over thirty
years.
Environmental
Matters and Legal Proceedings
Environmental Permits. The nature of a gas
distribution system means that relatively few environmental
operating permits are required. The most significant are air and
wastewater permits that are required for the SNG plant. These
permits contain restrictions and requirements that are typical
for an operation of this type. To date, TGC has been in
compliance with all material provisions of these permits and has
implemented environmental policies and procedures in an effort
to ensure continued compliance.
Environmental Compliance. We believe that TGC
is in compliance with applicable state and federal environmental
laws and regulations. With regard to hazardous waste, all TGC
facilities are generally classified as conditionally exempt
small quantity generators, which means they generate between
zero and one hundred kilograms of hazardous waste in a calendar
month. Under normal operating conditions, the facilities do not
generate hazardous waste. Hazardous waste, if produced, should
pose little or no ongoing risk to the facilities from a
regulatory standpoint because SNG and LPG dissipate quickly when
released.
Other Environmental Matters. Pier 38 and
Parcels 8 and 9, which are owned by the state of Hawaii
Department of Transportation Harbors Division, or
DOT, and which are currently used or have been used
S-72
previously by TGC or its predecessors, have known environmental
contamination and have undergone remediation work. Prior
operations on these parcels included a parking lot, propane
loading and unloading facilities, a propane air system and a
propane tank storage facility. Effective September 13,
2005, Parcel 8 and a portion of Parcel 9 were returned to DOT
under an agreement that did not require remediation by TGC. We
believe that any contamination on the portion of Parcel 9 that
TGC continues to use resulted from sources other than TGCs
operations because the contamination is not consistent with
TGCs past uses of the property.
Legal Proceedings. TGC is periodically
involved in certain legal, regulatory, administrative and
environmental proceedings before various judicial authorities,
arbitration panels and governmental agencies. These matters all
arise in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings can
include contract disputes, environmental reviews, tax and
financial audits and inquiries from regulators. Although we
cannot predict the final disposition of any such proceedings, we
believe that no current matter will have a material effect on
TGCs operations or financial statements.
International-Matex
Tank Terminals
Our
Acquisition
Through our indirectly wholly owned subsidiary, Macquarie
Terminal Holdings LLC, we completed the acquisition of a 50%
economic and voting interest in IMTT Holdings Inc. (formerly
known as Loving Enterprises, Inc.) on May 1, 2006 at a cost
of $250 million plus transaction costs of approximately
$7 million. The shares acquired by us were newly issued by
IMTT Holdings Inc. IMTT Holdings Inc. is the ultimate holding
company for IMTT. The balance of the shares in IMTT Holdings
Inc. are beneficially held by four related individuals.
Business
Overview
IMTT provides bulk liquid storage and handling services in North
America through a total of eight terminals located on the East,
West and Gulf coasts and the Great Lakes region of the United
States and a partially owned terminal in each of Quebec and
Newfoundland, Canada. The largest terminals are located on the
New York Harbor and on the Mississippi River near the Gulf of
Mexico. IMTT stores and handles petroleum products, various
chemicals and vegetable and animal oils. IMTT is one of the
largest companies in the bulk liquid storage terminal industry
in the United States, based on capacity. IMTT had revenue of
$250.6 million and operating income of $47.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and total assets of
$549.2 million at December 31, 2005.
In the year ending December 31, 2005, IMTT generated
approximately 53% of its terminal revenue and 45% of its
terminal gross profit at its Bayonne, New Jersey facility, which
services New York Harbor, and 32% of its total terminal revenue
and 47% of its terminal gross profit at its St. Rose, Gretna and
Avondale, Louisiana facilities, which together service the lower
Mississippi River region (with St. Rose as the largest
contributor). The balance of IMTTs total terminal revenue
and terminal gross profit in the year ending December 31,
2005 was generated from IMTTs four other wholly owned
storage facilities in the United States and two partially owned
facilities in Canada.
IMTT stores a wide range of petroleum, chemical and agricultural
products at its terminals. The table below summarizes the
proportion of the revenues generated from the major commodities
stored at IMTTs terminal at Bayonne, IMTTs terminals
in Louisiana (St. Rose, Gretna and Avondale) and IMTTs
other U.S. terminals for the year ended December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of Terminal Revenue from Major Commodities
Stored
|
Bayonne Terminal
|
|
Louisiana Terminals
|
|
Other US Terminals
|
|
Black Oil: 35%
|
|
Black Oil: 49%
|
|
Chemical: 37%
|
Gasoline: 21%
|
|
Chemical: 23%
|
|
Black Oil: 14%
|
Chemical: 21%
|
|
Vegetable and Animal Oil: 14%
|
|
|
Black Oil includes 6 oil which is a heavy fuel used in
electricity generation, as fuel for ships, where it is referred
to as bunker oil, and for other industrial uses. Black Oil also
includes vacuum gas oil, which is
S-73
used as a feedstock for tertiary stages in oil refineries, where
it is further broken down into other petroleum products.
Outside of its terminal operations, IMTT also owns two
additional businesses: Oil Mop, an environmental response and
spill clean up business and St. Rose Nursery, a nursery business.
Oil Mop has a network of facilities along the U.S. Gulf
coast between Houston and New Orleans. These facilities service
predominantly the Gulf region, but also respond to spill events
as needed throughout the United States and internationally. The
business generates approximately one half of its revenue from
spill clean up, one quarter from tank cleaning and the balance
from other activities including vacuum truck services, waste
disposal and material sales to the spill clean up sector. The
underlying drivers of demand for spill clean up services include
shipping and oil and gas industry activity levels in the Gulf
region, the aging of pipeline and other mid-stream petroleum
infrastructure, the frequency of natural disasters and
regulations regarding the standards of spill clean up. Revenue
generated by Oil Mop from spill clean up tends to be highly
variable depending on the frequency and magnitude of spills in
any particular period.
St. Rose Nursery is located adjacent to IMTTs
St. Rose terminal and acts as a green buffer
between the terminal and neighboring residential properties.
St. Rose Nursery grows plants and repackages cut flowers
for sale through retail outlets throughout Louisiana and
historically has not contributed significantly to IMTTs
gross profit.
Industry
Overview
Bulk liquid storage terminals are an essential link in the
supply chain for most major liquid commodities that are
transported in bulk. Such facilities are principally used to
store inventory and may be owned by the owner of the products
stored or owned by companies such as IMTT who rent the storage
facilities to third parties for storage of their products.
Products commonly stored in bulk include crude oil, refined
petroleum products such as gasoline, basic or commodity
chemicals such as methanol and ethanol, specialty chemicals and
vegetable and animal oils.
The ability of any bulk liquid storage terminal to increase its
storage rates is principally driven by the balance between the
supply and demand for storage in the locale that the terminal
serves and the attributes of the terminal in terms of dock water
depth and access to land based infrastructure such as a
pipeline, rail and road.
The demand for bulk liquid storage in the United States is
fundamentally driven by the level of product inventories, which
is a function of the volume of the stored products consumed and
which in turn is largely driven by economic activity. Import and
export levels of bulk liquid products are also important drivers
of demand for domestic bulk liquid storage as imports and
exports require storage for the staging, aggregation
and/or
break-up of
the products before and after shipment. An example of this is
basic or commodity chemicals which are used as feedstock in the
production of specialty chemical products. As a result of high
natural gas prices in the United States, the cost of producing
commodity chemicals that use natural gas as a feedstock such as
methanol is now higher in the United States than the cost of
importing such chemicals from countries with low cost natural
gas. As a result domestic production of such chemicals has
declined while imports have increased substantially, generating
increased demand for bulk commodity chemical storage in the
United States.
In terms of tankage supply, tightening environmental
regulations, limited availability of waterfront land with the
necessary access to land-based infrastructure, community
resistance and high capital costs represent substantial barriers
to the construction of new bulk liquid storage facilities,
particularly in storage markets located near major urban
populations such as New York Harbor. As a consequence, new
supply is generally created by the addition of tankage to
existing terminals where existing infrastructure can be
leveraged, resulting in higher returns on invested capital.
However, the ability of an existing terminal to add to its
capacity is limited not only by available land but also by the
ability of the terminals dock infrastructure, which can be
expensive to upgrade, to service, in a timely manner, the higher
levels of ship traffic that results from tankage expansion.
S-74
Based on the aforementioned industry factors, we believe that a
supportive supply/demand balance for bulk liquid storage at
well-located, capable terminals will continue to exist over the
medium to long term. As discussed above, in the year ending
December 31, 2005, IMTT generated approximately 91% of the
total gross profit from its terminal operations from its
facilities in New York Harbor at Bayonne, New Jersey and on the
lower Mississippi River at St. Rose, Gretna and Avondale,
Louisiana. All of these facilities are well-located in key
distribution centers for bulk liquid products, have deep water
berths allowing large ships to dock without lightering and have
access to road, rail and, in the case of Bayonne and
St. Rose, pipeline infrastructure for onward distribution
of stored product.
Strategy
We believe that IMTT will continue to benefit from overall
growth in the demand for bulk liquid storage and constraints on
increases in supply of such storage in the key markets in which
it operates. We believe that the positive impact of such factors
on IMTTs revenues and profits will be maximized by IMTT
continuing to follow its existing internal growth and expansion
and acquisitions strategies.
Internal Growth. IMTT will continue to
maximize revenue and profitability growth through optimizing the
mix of commodities stored at IMTTs terminals so that
tankage is rented for the storage of commodities where the
supply/demand balance for storage for such commodities and
therefore the storage rates are most favorable. IMTT also plans
to continue to invest in improving the capabilities of its
facilities to receive and distribute stored product from and to
multiple modes of transportation at high speed. This includes
continuing to invest in dock, pipeline and pumping
infrastructure and dredging to ensure that large ships and
barges which represent the cheapest transport options for
customers can deliver and receive stored product from
IMTTs facilities with fast turnaround so that the costs
associated with shipping such as demurrage are minimized. As
such investments create immediate value for customers in the
form of lower supply chain costs and increased logistical
flexibility, the costs of such investments can usually be
recovered quickly through storage rate increases. This is
attractive given that such infrastructure investments have a
long useful life and therefore result in a near permanent
improvement in the capabilities of IMTTs facilities and
their long-term competitive position. Finally, IMTT intends to
maintain its current high level of customer service.
Expansions and Acquisitions. IMTT plans to
continue to increase its share of available storage capacity and
thereby continue to improve its competitive position in the key
storage markets of New York Harbor and the lower Mississippi
River. IMTT intends to do this through a combination of:
|
|
|
|
|
the construction of new tankage at existing facilities in these
markets when supported by existing customer demand;
|
|
|
|
the completion of the construction of the new chemical storage
facility at Geismar, Louisiana which will establish IMTT as a
significant participant in the market for specialty chemical
storage in the lower Mississippi River and also provide a strong
base from which to expand this initial presence; and
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of smaller terminals in these markets where
capacity utilization, storage rates and therefore terminal gross
profit can be increased under IMTTs ownership.
|
IMTT will also consider the acquisition of storage facilities in
markets outside of the key markets in which it currently
operates and where IMTT believes that over the long term a
favorable supply/demand balance will exist for bulk liquid
storage or where IMTT believes that the performance of the
facilities can be improved under its ownership.
S-75
Locations
The location of each of IMTTs facilities, its storage
capacity, as measured by the number of tanks in service and
their aggregate capacity, and its marine capabilities, as
measured by the number of ship and barge docks for the loading
and unloading of stored product, are summarized in the table
below. This information is as of December 31, 2005 and
reflects capacity available for rent, excluding recovery tanks
and tanks used in packaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Aggregate Capacity
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Tanks
|
|
of Storage Tanks
|
|
Ship and Barge
|
Facility
|
|
Land
|
|
in Service
|
|
in Service
|
|
Docks in Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions of barrels)
|
|
|
|
Facilities in the United
States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayonne, NJ
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
St. Rose, LA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Gretna, LA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Avondale, LA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Geismar, LA(1)
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Lemont, IL
|
|
Owned/Leased
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Richmond, CA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Richmond, VA
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Facilities in Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quebec City, Quebec(2)
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Placentia Bay, Newfoundland(3)
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currently under construction |
|
(2) |
|
Indirectly 66.6% owned by IMTT |
|
(3) |
|
Indirectly 20.1% owned by IMTT |
IMTTs operations are conducted on predominantly owned
land. In addition to marine access, all facilities have road
access and, except for Richmond, Virginia and Placentia Bay,
have rail access that enables these facilities to send and
receive stored product by these modes of transport.
Bayonne, New Jersey. IMTTs terminal at
Bayonne, New Jersey, is IMTTs largest terminal by storage
capacity with 15.3 million barrels. It is located on the
Kill Van Kull between New Jersey and Staten Island and provides
storage services to New York Harbor, or NYH. IMTT-Bayonne has a
substantial share of the market for third party petroleum and
liquid chemical storage in NYH and is the largest third party
bulk liquid storage facility in NYH by capacity. IMTT-Bayonne
has been aggregated over a number of years by IMTT through
progressive acquisitions of neighboring facilities.
NYH is the main petroleum trading hub in the
U.S. northeast. NYH is the physical delivery point for the
gasoline and heating oil futures contracts traded on NYMEX. NYH
is also the endpoint for the major refined petroleum product
pipelines from the U.S. gulf region where approximately
half of U.S. domestic refining capacity is located, the
starting point for refined petroleum product pipelines from the
East coast to the inland markets and the key port for
U.S. refined petroleum product imports from outside of the
United States. IMTT-Bayonne has connections to the Colonial,
Buckeye and Harbor refined petroleum product pipelines. It also
has rail and road connections. As a result, IMTT-Bayonne
provides its customers with substantial logistic flexibility
that is at least comparable with its competitors. This feature
is attractive to IMTTs customers.
Due to a U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, or USACE, dredging
program for the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay, the water depth in
the channel passing IMTT-Bayonnes docks is 45 feet
(although IMTT has dredged some but not all of its docks to that
depth) and there is a plan to dredge to 50 feet. Almost all
of
S-76
IMTTs competitors in NYH are located on Arthur Kill and
there are no plans of which we are aware for the USACE to dredge
this body of water beyond its current depth. As a result, the
water depth at the docks of all of IMTT-Bayonnes major
competitors is substantially less than 45 feet. This
difference in water depth is significant in that IMTT can handle
large ships at full load without the need for lightering which
delays ships and is expensive. IMTT-Bayonnes facility also
has a large waterfront and as a consequence a large number of
docks. As a result, IMTT-Bayonnes docks are generally
uncongested, which reduces ship turnaround times and demurrage
costs.
We believe the current favorable supply/demand balance for bulk
liquid storage in NYH is evident in the high capacity
utilization experienced by IMTT-Bayonne. For the three years
ended December 31, 2005, on average approximately 95% of
IMTT-Bayonnes available storage capacity was rented.
St. Rose/Avondale/Gretna/Geismar,
Louisiana. IMTTs St. Rose, Avondale,
Gretna and Geismar terminals on the lower Mississippi River in
Louisiana have a combined storage capacity of 14.1 million
barrels with St. Rose as the largest with storage capacity
of 11.4 million barrels. IMTT-St. Rose, individually
and in combination with IMTTs other terminals on the lower
Mississippi River, has a substantial share of the market for
third party bulk liquid storage on the lower Mississippi River
and St. Rose is the largest third party bulk liquid storage
facility on the lower Mississippi River.
The Mississippi River is a key transport route in the United
States and the bulk liquid storage terminals near the mouth of
the Mississippi River perform two major functions. First, the
terminals provide an interface (i.e. a transshipment point)
between the central United States and the rest of the world for
the import and export of liquid agricultural products. Second,
the terminals also service the petroleum and chemical industries
along the U.S. gulf coast, lower Mississippi River and the
midwest. The U.S. gulf coast region hosts approximately
half of U.S. domestic petroleum refining capacity and is
the access point for the majority of crude oil imports into the
United States. All of IMTTs facilities in Louisiana are
located on the lower portion of the Mississippi River, which is
navigable by large ships. Thus, IMTTs Louisiana facilities
with their deep water ship and barge docks and rail and road
infrastructure access are highly capable of performing the
functions discussed above.
Similar to IMTT-Bayonne, we believe the current favorable
supply/demand balance for bulk liquid storage in the lower
Mississippi is illustrated by the level of capacity utilization
at IMTTs Louisiana facilities. For the three years ended
December 31, 2005, on average approximately 93% of the
available storage capacity of IMTTs Louisiana terminals
was rented. Due to strong demand for storage capacity, IMTT is
currently in the process of constructing 15 new storage tanks
with a total capacity of approximately 1.5 million barrels
at its Louisiana facilities at a total estimated cost of
approximately $39.0 million. It is anticipated that
construction of these tanks will be completed from late 2006
through late 2007. Rental contracts with initial terms of at
least three years have already been executed in relation to 11
of these tanks with the balance of the tanks to be used to
service customers while their existing tanks are undergoing
maintenance over the next five years. Overall, it is anticipated
that the operation of the new tanks will contribute
approximately $6.4 million to IMTTs terminal gross
profit and EBITDA annually. At Geismar, a new, approximately
570,000 barrel bulk liquid chemical storage and handling
facility is under construction with capital committed to date of
$160.0 million. Based on the current project scope and
subject to certain minimum volumes of chemical products being
handled by the facility, existing customer contracts are
anticipated to generate terminal gross profit and EBITDA of at
least approximately $18.8 million per year assuming the
major customer contract is ultimately accounted for as an
operating lease (in the event that the major customer contract
is ultimately accounted for as a finance lease, the
projects contribution to terminal gross profit and EBITDA
will be reduced, but the projects contribution to
IMTTs distributable cash flow will be unchanged).
Completion of construction of the initial $160.0 million
phase of the Geismar project is targeted for the end of 2007. In
the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, construction costs in the
region affected by the hurricane have increased and labor
shortages have been experienced. Although a significant amount
of the impact of hurricane Katrina on construction costs has
already been incorporated into the capital commitment plan,
there could be further negative impacts on the cost of
constructing the Geismar, Louisiana project (which may not be
offset by an increase in its gross profit and EBITDA
contribution) and/or the project construction schedule.
S-77
Other Terminals. IMTTs smaller
operations in the United States consist of Chesapeake and
Richmond, Virginia, located in the mid-Atlantic region on the
Elizabeth and James Rivers, respectively, Lemont, located on the
upper Mississippi near the Great Lakes, and Richmond,
California, located in San Francisco Bay area. In Canada,
IMTT owns 66.6% of a terminal located at the Port of Quebec on
the St. Lawrence River and 20.1% of a facility located on
Placentia Bay, Newfoundland, which is a specialized facility
used for the transshipment of crude oil from fields off the East
coast of Canada. As a group, these facilities have a total
storage capacity of 7.2 million barrels and generate less
than 10% of IMTTs terminal gross profit.
Competition
The competitive environment in which IMTT operates varies by
terminal location. The principal competition for each of
IMTTs facilities comes from other third-party bulk liquid
storage facilities located in the same storage market.
IMTTs major competitor in the New York Harbor storage
market in which the Bayonne facility operates is Kinder Morgan,
which has three storage facilities in the New York Harbor area.
Kinder Morgan is also IMTTs main competitor in the lower
Mississippi River storage market in which IMTTs Louisiana
facilities operate. In both the New York Harbor and Lower
Mississippi markets, IMTT operates the largest third-party
terminal by capacity, and IMTT and Kinder Morgan on a combined
basis control a substantial majority of the bulk liquid storage
capacity available for use by third parties. We believe that
IMTTs large share of the market for third-party bulk
liquid storage in the New York Harbor and lower Mississippi
regions, combined with the capabilities of IMTTs
facilities at Bayonne and in Louisiana, provides IMTT with a
strong competitive position in the New York Harbor and Lower
Mississippi bulk liquid storage markets.
IMTTs minor facilities in Illinois, California and
Virginia represent only a small proportion of available bulk
liquid storage capacity in their respective markets and have
numerous competitors with facilities of similar or larger size
with similar capabilities.
Secondary competition for IMTTs facilities comes from bulk
liquid storage facilities located in the same broad geographic
region as IMTTs terminals. For example, bulk liquid
storage facilities located on the Houston Ship Channel provide a
moderate level of competition for IMTTs Louisiana
facilities.
Customers
IMTT provides bulk liquid storage services principally to
vertically integrated petroleum product producers, petroleum
product refiners, chemical manufacturers, food processors and
traders of bulk liquid petroleum, chemical and agricultural
products. At IMTTs Bayonne facility, the largest customer
generated 13% of the facilitys total terminal revenue and
the five largest customers generated 43% of the facilitys
total terminal revenue for the year ended December 31,
2005. At IMTTs Louisiana facilities, the largest customer
generated 15% of the facilities total terminal revenue and
the five largest customers generated 57% of the facilities
total terminal revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Customer
Contracts
Storage tanks are generally rented to customers under contracts
with terms of between one and five years. Pursuant to these
contracts, customers generally pay for the capacity of the tank
irrespective of whether the tank is actually used. Tank rentals
are generally payable monthly and rates are stated in terms of
cents per barrel of storage capacity per month. Tank rental
rates vary by commodity stored and by location. IMTTs
standard form of customer contract generally permits a certain
number of free product movements into and out of the storage
tank with charges for throughput above the prescribed levels.
Where a customer is renting a tank that is required to be heated
to prevent the stored product from becoming excessively viscous,
pursuant to the customer contract, IMTT charges the customer for
the heating of the tank with such charges essentially reflecting
a pass-through of IMTTs cost of providing heating which is
principally the cost of fuel. Pursuant to IMTTs standard
form of customer contract, tank rental rates, throughput rates
and the rates for some other services are generally subject to
annual inflation increases. The product stored in the tanks
remains the
S-78
property of the customer at all times and therefore IMTT takes
no commodity price risk. The customer is also responsible for
insurance against loss of the stored product.
Regulation
The rates that IMTT charges for the services that it provides
are not subject to regulation. However, IMTTs operations
are overseen by a number of regulatory bodies and IMTT must
comply with numerous federal, state and local environmental,
occupational health and safety, security and planning statutes
and regulations. These regulations require IMTT to obtain and
maintain permits to operate its facilities and impose standards
that govern the way IMTT operates its business. If IMTT does not
comply with the relevant regulations, IMTT could lose its
operating permits and become subject to fines and increased
liability in the event of an accident that involved its
facilities. As a result, IMTT has developed environmental and
health and safety compliance functions at the terminal level
which are overseen by the terminal managers and IMTTs
Director of Environmental, Health and Safety, Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Executive Officer located at the head office.
While changes in environmental, health and safety regulations
pose a risk to IMTTs operations, such changes are
generally phased in over time to manage the impact on industry.
The Bayonne, New Jersey terminal which has been acquired and
aggregated over a 22 year period, contains pervasive
remediation requirements that were assumed at the time of
purchase from the various former owners. One former owner
retained environmental remediation responsibilities for a
purchased site as well as sharing other remediation costs. These
remediation requirements are documented in two memoranda of
agreement and an administrative consent order with the State of
New Jersey. Remediation efforts entail removal of the free
product, soil treatment, repair/replacement of sewer systems,
and the implementation of containment and monitoring systems.
These remediation activities are estimated to span a period of
ten to twenty years or more.
The Lemont terminal has entered into a consent order with the
State of Illinois to remediate contamination at the site that
pre-dated IMITT ownership. Remediation is also required as a
result of the renewal of a lease with a government agency for a
portion of the terminal. This remediation effort, consisting of
among other things, the implementation of extraction and
monitoring wells and soil treatment, is estimated to span a
period of ten to twenty years.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources for discussion of the expected future
capitalized cost of environmental remediation.
Management
The
day-to-day
operation of IMTTs terminals is overseen by individual
terminal managers who are responsible for all aspects of the
operations at their sites. IMTTs terminal managers have on
average 29 years experience in the bulk liquid storage
industry and 17 years service with IMTT.
IMTTs head office is based in New Orleans. The head office
provides the business with central management, performs support
functions such as accounting, tax, human resources, insurance,
information technology and legal services and provides support
for functions that have been partially de-centralized to the
terminal level such as engineering and environmental and
occupational health and safety regulatory compliance.
IMTTs senior management team other than the terminal
managers have on average 21 years experience in the
bulk liquid storage industry and 21 years service with IMTT.
Employees
As at June 30, 2006, IMTT had a total of 934 employees with
704 employed at the bulk liquid storage terminals, 90 employed
by Oil Mop, 69 employed by St. Rose Nursery and 71 employed
at the head office in New Orleans. At the Bayonne terminal, 132
staff members are unionized, and at the Lemont terminal, 48 of
the staff members are unionized. Of the unionized employees at
Bayonne, 126 are members of the Paper, Allied-Industrial
Chemical and Energy Workers International Union, now United
Steel Workers, or
S-79
USW, and the balance are members of the Teamsters Union. The
unionized employees at Lemont are also members of USW.
The collective bargaining agreement with USW at Bayonne extends
until June 2011, the collective bargaining agreement with the
Teamsters at Bayonne extends until April 2007 and the collective
bargaining agreement at Lemont extends until October 2007.
We believe employee relations at IMTT are good.
Shareholders
Agreement
Upon acquisition of our interest in IMTT, through our indirectly
wholly owned subsidiary Macquarie Terminal Holdings LLC, we
became a party to a shareholders agreement relating to
IMTT Holdings Inc. The other parties to the shareholders
agreement are IMTT Holdings Inc. and the four individual
shareholders of IMTT Holdings. A summary of the key terms of the
IMTT Holdings Inc. shareholders agreement, which was
filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form
8-K filed
with the SEC on April 14, 2006 and is incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement, is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Detail and Comment
|
|
Parties
|
|
|
|
IMTT Holdings Inc,
Then-Current
Shareholders and Macquarie Terminal Holdings LLC
|
Section 3
|
|
Board of Directors and Investor
Representative
|
|
Board
of IMTT Holdings of six members with three appointees from
Macquarie Terminal Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
All
decisions of the Board require majority approval, including the
approval of at least one member appointed by Macquarie Terminal
Holdings LLC and one member appointed by the
Then-Current
Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Customary
list of items that must be referred to Board for approval.
|
|
|
|
|
MIC
will appoint an Investor Representative, or IR, and may, at its
election, delegate some decision making authority with respect
to IMTT to the IR.
|
Section 4
|
|
Dividend Policy
|
|
Fixed
quarterly distributions to MIC of $7 million per quarter
through December 31, 2007 subject only to
(i) compliance with financial covenants and law and
(ii) retention of adequate cash reserves and committed and
unutilized credit facilities as required for IMTT to meet the
normal requirements of its business and to fund capital
expenditures commitments approved by the Board.
|
|
|
|
|
Commencing
March 2008, required quarterly distributions of 100% of cash
from operations and cash from investing activities less
maintenance capital expenditures, subject only to
(i) compliance with financial covenants and law and
(ii) retention of adequate cash reserves and committed and
unutilized credit facilities as required for IMTT to meet the
normal requirements of its business and to fund capital
expenditures commitments approved by the Board.
|
S-80
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Detail and Comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commencing
March 2008, if debt: EBITDA (ex-shareholder loans) at the end of
the quarter is greater than 4.25x then the payment of dividends
is not mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
Then-Current
Shareholders will lend all dividends received for quarters
through December 31, 2007 back to IMTT Holdings. Such
shareholder loans will be repaid over 15 years commencing
March 2008 and earn a fixed interest rate of 5.5%.
|
Section 5
|
|
Capital Structure Policy
|
|
Commencing
March 2008, minimum gearing requirement of debt: EBITDA
(ex-shareholder loans) of 3.75x with proceeds of regearing paid
out as dividends.
|
Section 6
|
|
Corporate Opportunities
|
|
All
shareholders are required to offer investment opportunities in
bulk liquid terminal sector to IMTT.
|
Section 7
|
|
Non-Compete
|
|
Shareholders
will not invest or engage in businesses that compete directly
with IMTTs business.
|
Section 8
|
|
CEO and CFO Succession
|
|
Pre-agreed
successor to current chief executive officer is identified.
Thereafter,
Then-Current
Shareholders are entitled to nominate chief executive officer
whose appointment will be subject to Board approval.
|
|
|
|
|
After
the current chief financial officer, MIC is entitled to nominate
all subsequent chief financial officers whose appointment will
be subject to Board approval.
|
Section 9
|
|
Transfer Restrictions/Right of
First Refusal
|
|
No
transfers other than to affiliates within the first
10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter,
transfers are subject to right of first refusal and consent of
non-selling shareholders.
|
Section 10
|
|
Shareholder Default
|
|
60-day
cure period. Remedies include specific performance and
indemnities for monetary damages.
|
Section 11
|
|
Special Governance Standards
|
|
Provides
MIC with enhanced rights in the event that MIC controls IMTT in
the future.
|
Section 12
|
|
Contractual Dispute Resolution
|
|
Arbitration
in Delaware.
|
Section 13
|
|
Board Deadlock Resolution
|
|
Arbitration
in Delaware (arbitrator required to have appropriate level of
commercial experience).
|
Section 14
|
|
MIC Information and Reporting
Requirements
|
|
MIC
is entitled to receive all information in a timely manner as
required to (i) monitor the performance of the business,
(ii) meet its public disclosure obligations,
(iii) satisfy its reporting obligations to lenders and
(iv) complete its tax returns.
|
Section 15
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
The
parties agree to reincorporate Loving in Delaware (currently
incorporated in Louisiana) and change its name to IMTT Holdings
Inc. This is now complete.
|
|
|
|
|
Governing
Law Delaware
|
S-81
Properties
IMTT owns and operates eight wholly owned bulk liquid storage
facilities in the United States and has part ownership in two
companies that each own bulk liquid storage facilities in
Canada. The land on which the facilities are located is either
owned or leased by IMTT with leased land comprising a small
proportion of the aggregate amount of land on which the
facilities are located. IMTT also owns the storage tanks, piping
and transportation infrastructure such as docks and truck and
rail loading equipment located at all facilities, except for
Quebec and Geismar where the docks are leased. We believe that
the aforementioned equipment that is in service is generally
well maintained and adequate for the present operations.
Legal
Proceedings
IMTT is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Trajen
Holdings, Inc.
Our
Acquisition
On July 11, 2006, MIC Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary,
completed the purchase of 100% of the shares of Trajen. The
transaction was concluded by our subsidiary Atlantic FBO Holdco
(formerly known as North America Capital Holding Company), the
parent of our airport services business. Trajen is the holding
company for a group of companies, limited liability companies
and limited partnerships that own and operate 23 FBOs at
airports in 11 states. The Trajen business is being
integrated with our airport services business operated as
Atlantic Aviation. Trajen also owned two businesses, Trajen
Systems and Department of Defense Services, providers of
logistical and technical services to government agencies, that
were retained by the sellers of Trajen.
We paid $363.0 million for Trajen, including transaction
costs, integration and pre-funded capital expenditures, an
estimated working capital adjustment and an increase in a debt
service reserve. The payment was funded with a combination of a
$180 million increase in an existing loan facility at
Atlantic FBO Holdco, a $180 million increase in borrowings
under the MIC Inc. acquisition credit facility and available
cash of $3.0 million. Transaction-related expenses totaled
$10.7 million, integration and pre-funded growth capital
expenditures totaled $5.9 million and the increase in the
debt service reserve totaled $6.6 million. For a detailed
discussion of the Atlantic FBO Holdco term loan borrowing please
see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Business
Overview
Trajen is being integrated into our airport services business,
as further described below. For a detailed discussion of our
airport services business segment, its industry and strategy,
please see Business Our Businesses and
Investments Airport Services Business in our
amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, which is incorporated by reference
in this prospectus supplement.
Like our existing FBOs, Trajens FBOs generate revenue
primarily through the sale of fuel to owners/operators of jet
aircraft in the general aviation sector of the air travel
industry. Some sites also provide fuel and fuel-related services
to commercial
and/or
military aircraft. Overall, approximately 13% of Trajens
gross profit is generated from fuelling military-related
aircraft. At its San Antonio location, Trajen currently
provides fuelling only to military-related aircraft, although
Trajen plans to expand its operations at that location to also
service general aviation customers. In general, Trajens
strategy is to maintain and, where possible, to grow a
dollar-based margin per gallon of fuel sold. Trajen generates a
smaller amount of revenue from hangar, ramp and office rental
and catering and other services.
In operating and maintaining each FBO, Trajen incurs fixed
expenses, such as lease payments and insurance, as well as
expenses that increase with the xlevel of activity, such as
salaries. In addition, Trajen incurs general and administrative
expenses at its head office that include senior management
expenses as well as accounting, information technology, human
resources, environmental compliance and other system costs. A
S-82
limited amount of these expenses are expected to be reduced or
eliminated following integration of the business with existing
Atlantic FBO operations in our airport services business. The
results of the businesses will be reported as components of our
airport services business segment.
We believe that there is little seasonality in our airport
services business generally, and in Trajens results
specifically.
Locations
Trajens facilities operate pursuant to long-term leases
from airport authorities or local government agencies. The
leases have an average remaining length of approximately
21.4 years. The average remaining lease life across our
entire airport services business increases from 17.1 years
to 18.7 years with the addition of the Trajen facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FBOs at
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Lease
|
Airport
|
|
Location
|
|
Airport
|
|
by Trajen
|
|
Expiry(1)
|
|
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
1
|
|
Jun 2006
|
|
2024
|
Stockton Metropolitan Airport
|
|
Stockton, California
|
|
None
|
|
May 2006
|
|
2032
|
Waukesha County Airport
|
|
Waukesha, Wisconsin
|
|
None
|
|
Apr 2006
|
|
2018
|
Palwaukee Municipal Airport
|
|
Wheeling, Illinois
|
|
1
|
|
Mar 2006
|
|
2023
|
Kissimmee Gateway Airport
|
|
Kissimmee, Florida
|
|
4
|
|
Feb 2006
|
|
2038
|
Aspen/Pitkin County Airport
|
|
Aspen, Colorado
|
|
None
|
|
Oct 2005
|
|
2023
|
Elmira/Corning Regional Airport
|
|
Elmira, New York
|
|
None
|
|
Sep 2005
|
|
2035
|
Greater Binghamton/Edwin Link Field
|
|
Binghamton, New York
|
|
None
|
|
Sep 2005
|
|
2032
|
El Paso International Airport
|
|
El Paso, Texas
|
|
1
|
|
Apr 2005
|
|
2033
|
Lake Tahoe Airport
|
|
South Lake Tahoe, California
|
|
None
|
|
Apr 2005
|
|
2009
|
Wiley Post Airport
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
|
|
1
|
|
2004
|
|
2025
|
Austin-Bergstrom International
Airport
|
|
Austin, Texas
|
|
1
|
|
2003
|
|
2038
|
George Bush Intercontinental
Airport
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
1
|
|
2003
|
|
2014
|
Natrona County International
Airport
|
|
Casper, Wyoming
|
|
None
|
|
2003
|
|
2017
|
Tucson International Airport
|
|
Tucson, Arizona
|
|
4
|
|
2003
|
|
2021
|
Fort Worth Meacham
International Airport
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
3
|
|
2003
|
|
2032
|
Ketchikan International Airport
|
|
Ketchikan, Alaska
|
|
None
|
|
2003
|
|
2013
|
Juneau International Airport
|
|
Juneau, Alaska
|
|
1
|
|
2003
|
|
2025
|
Sitka Airport
|
|
Sitka, Alaska
|
|
None
|
|
2003
|
|
2033
|
Gustavus Airport
|
|
Gustavus, Alaska
|
|
None
|
|
2003
|
|
Monthly
|
Hayward Executive Airport
|
|
Hayward, California
|
|
1
|
|
2000
|
|
2048
|
Kelly Field Air Force Base
|
|
San Antonio, Texas
|
|
None
|
|
2000
(Start-up)
|
|
2047
|
Sacramento Mather Airport
|
|
Sacramento, California
|
|
None
|
|
1999
(Start-up)
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes renewal options |
The airport authorities have termination rights in each lease.
Standard terms allow for termination if the tenant defaults on
the terms and conditions of the lease, abandons the property or
becomes insolvent or bankrupt. Most of the leases allow for the
lease to be terminated if there are liens filed against the
property. Such terms are standard throughout the industry.
S-83
Employees
As of July 11, 2006, Trajen had approximately 425 employees
dedicated to its FBO operations. None of these employees are
covered by collective bargaining agreements. We believe that
employee relations at Trajen are good.
Integration
We plan to integrate the Trajen FBOs into our existing Atlantic
FBO operations. Trajen FBOs will be managed by our existing
Atlantic management team. Trajens head office is currently
located in Bryan, Texas. We will retain the Bryan office for a
period of approximately 12 months, during which time we
will transfer functions performed in Bryan to Atlantics
head office in Plano, Texas, reassign the reporting lines from
Bryan to Plano and implement Atlantics information
technology, accounting and human resources systems at the Trajen
sites.
Combined with our existing portfolio of 19 FBOs, the total of 42
sites will constitute the second largest network of FBOs in the
United States. A large, nationwide network can benefit from
certain economies of scale, for example, using our existing
Atlantic management team to oversee the operations of the larger
combined operations. In addition, we believe that the expanded
geographic coverage resulting from our acquisition of Trajen
improves brand awareness and our competitive position among FBO
networks generally. Further, of the airports at which we
operate, the percentage at which we are the sole service
provider has increased as a result of the Trajen acquisition.
There is no overlap between the locations of our existing 19
Atlantic FBOs and the 23 Trajen FBOs.
We anticipate branding a majority of Trajens FBOs as
Atlantic. We will undertake the branding on a
site-by-site
basis in conjunction with the implementation of Atlantics
information technology systems. The sites will be re-branded
starting with the largest and working through to the smaller
sites. In addition, we expect that as a part of our integration
of the Trajen and Atlantic businesses we will introduce our
Atlantic Awards pilot incentive program to the Trajen sites.
Our
Existing Businesses
For a detailed discussion of our operating segments and existing
businesses and our results of operations, please see
Business Our Businesses and Investments
in our amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
SEC on October 16, 2006, which is incorporated by reference in
this prospectus supplement.
S-84
SHARE
OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of shares of trust stock by each person who
is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent of the outstanding shares of trust stock, each of our
directors and executive officers and our directors and executive
officers as a group as of September 30, 2006, based on
27,212,165 shares issued and outstanding.
All holders of shares of trust stock are entitled to one vote
per share on all matters submitted to a vote of holders of
shares of trust stock. The voting rights attached to shares of
trust stock held by our directors, executive officers or major
shareholders do not differ from those that attach to shares of
trust stock held by any other holder.
Under
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act, beneficial ownership includes
shares for which the individual, directly or indirectly, has
voting power, meaning the power to control voting decisions, or
investment power, meaning the power to cause the sale of the
shares, whether or not the shares are held for the
individuals benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
(Number of Shares)
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Stock
|
|
|
Trust Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representing
|
|
|
Representing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sole Voting
|
|
|
Shared Voting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and/or
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
5% Beneficial Owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure
Management (USA) Inc.(1)
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
125 West 55th Street
New York, New York 10019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc.(2)
|
|
|
1,361,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361,100
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Merrill Lynch & Co.,
Inc.(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,037,100
|
|
|
|
2,037,100
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Directors(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Roberts(5)
|
|
|
53,400
|
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
2,632,048
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Norman H. Brown, Jr.
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
George W. Carmany, III
|
|
|
9,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,339
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William H. Webb
|
|
|
11,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,839
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Shemara Wikramanayake(5)
|
|
|
97,500
|
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
2,676,148
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Named Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Stokes(5)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
2,593,648
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
All Directors and Officers as a
Group
|
|
|
201,884
|
|
|
|
2,578,648
|
|
|
|
2,780,532
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Macquarie Bank Limited, or MBL, has entered into a total return
swap with respect to 599,000 shares of trust stock held by
our Manager, representing 2.2% of the outstanding Shares of
Trust Stock. The counterparty to the swap is Macquarie
International Infrastructure Fund Limited, or MIIF, a
mutual fund company which is managed by a member of the
Macquarie Group of companies. MBL had caused our Manager to
pledge 599,000 of its shares of trust stock to MIIF to
secure MBLs obligations under the total return swap. Our
Manager retains the voting rights on all the pledged shares. As
a result of this transaction, our Manager beneficially owns and
has sole voting power over 2,578,648 shares of trust stock,
sole dispositive power over 1,979,648 shares of trust stock
and shared dispositive power over 599,000 shares of trust
stock. |
footnotes continued on the following page
S-85
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Number of shares presented is based solely on the information
provided in a filing by such person with the SEC on
Schedule 13G. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes amounts beneficially owned by or on behalf of Merrill
Lynch Investment Managers and ML Global Allocation Fund, Inc.
The address of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. is World
Financial Center, North Tower, 250 Vesey Street New York, NY
10381 and the address of ML Global Allocation Fund, Inc. is 800
Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ 08536. Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc., or ML&Co., is a parent holding
company. Merrill Lynch Investment Managers is an operating
division of ML&Co. consisting of ML&Co.s
indirectly-owned asset management subsidiaries. The following
asset management subsidiaries hold certain shares of our trust
stock: Transamerica Fund Advisors, Fund Asset
Management, L.P., Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, L.P. |
|
(4) |
|
The address of each person is c/o Macquarie Infrastructure
Company LLC, 125 West 55th Street, New York, New York
10019. |
|
(5) |
|
Each of the following persons may be deemed to beneficially own,
and share voting and investment power in, the shares of trust
stock held by Macquarie Infrastructure Management (USA) Inc.,
our Manager, shown separately in the table above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Roberts, as the Global Head of the Macquarie
Groups IB Funds division, of which our Manager constitutes
a part.
|
|
|
|
Ms. Wikramanayake, as a director of our Manager.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stokes, as the president and a director of our Manager.
|
Each of the foregoing disclaims beneficial ownership and such
information shall not be construed as an admission that such
person is, for the purposes of Section 13(d) or 13(g) of
the Exchange Act, the beneficial owner of any of the shares of
trust stock owned by our Manager.
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Consists of shares for which the holder has neither voting nor
dispositive power. |
S-86
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
For information on our relationship with the Macquarie Group and
related party transactions, including those relating to our
acquisition and ownership of our existing businesses and
investments, our new businesses, certain of our debt facilities
and derivative instruments and contractual arrangements with our
Manager, please refer to our revised Definitive Proxy Statement
dated April 19, 2006, our amended Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006, respectively, our amended Current Reports on
Form 8-K/A
filed on May 16, 2006, and June 27, 2006, and our
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on June 12, 2006, June 28, 2006, June 29,
2006, July 13, 2006, August 22, 2006, August 28,
2006, September 7, 2006, September 25, 2006 and
October 2, 2006, each of which is incorporated by reference
into this prospectus supplement.
Our Manager is an affiliate of Macquarie Bank Limited and a
member of the Macquarie Group. From time to time, we have
entered into, and in the future we may enter into, transactions
and relationships involving Macquarie Bank Limited, its
affiliates, or other members of the Macquarie Group. Although
our audit committee, all of the members of which are independent
directors, is required to approve of any related party
transactions, including those involving Macquarie Bank Limited,
its affiliates, or members of the Macquarie Group, the
relationship of our Manager to Macquarie Bank Limited and the
Macquarie Group may result in conflicts-of-interest. See
Risk Factors Risks Related to Our
Business.
S-87
UNDERWRITING
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC are acting as representatives of the underwriters. Subject
to the terms and conditions described in a purchase agreement
between us and the underwriters, we have agreed to sell to the
underwriters, and the underwriters severally have agreed to
purchase from us, the number of shares listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith
Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies & Company,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Securities (USA)
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the terms and conditions in the purchase agreement,
the underwriters have agreed to purchase all the shares sold
under the purchase agreement if any of these shares are
purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the purchase agreement
provides that the purchase commitments of the nondefaulting
underwriters may be increased or the purchase agreement may be
terminated.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or
to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to
make in respect of those liabilities.
The underwriters are offering the shares, subject to prior sale,
when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to
approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the
validity of the shares, and other conditions contained in the
purchase agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of
officers certificates and legal opinions. The underwriters
reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the
public and to reject orders in whole or in part.
The allocation of shares in this offering is determined by the
underwriters, exercised within limits permitted by applicable
law and regulation. After the underwriters obtain indications of
interest from potential investors, including the number of
shares that a potential investor may be interested in
purchasing, the underwriters will determine the number of shares
to be offered to each potential investor from the
underwriters allocations. Depending on a variety of
factors, the underwriters may allocate to an investor a smaller
number of shares than that investor had expressed an interest in
purchasing, or allocate no shares at all to that investor.
Commissions
and Discounts
The representatives have advised us that the underwriters
propose initially to offer the shares to the public at the
initial public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus supplement and to dealers at that price less a
concession not in excess of
$ per share. The underwriters
may allow, and the dealers may reallow, a discount not in excess
of $ per share to other
dealers. After the public offering, the public offering price,
concession and discount may be changed.
S-88
The following table shows the public offering price,
underwriting discount and proceeds before expenses to us. The
information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the
underwriters of their overallotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Without Option
|
|
|
With Option
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The expenses of the offering, not including the underwriting
discount, are estimated at $2.5 million and are payable by
us.
Overallotment
Option
We have granted options to the underwriters to purchase up to
1,125,000 additional shares at the public offering price less
the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise these
options for 30 days from the date of this prospectus
supplement solely to cover any overallotments. If the
underwriters exercise these options, each underwriter will be
obligated, subject to conditions contained in the purchase
agreement, to purchase a number of additional shares
proportionate to that underwriters initial amount
reflected in the above table.
No Sales
of Similar Securities
We and our executive officers and directors and our Manager have
agreed, with exceptions, not to sell or transfer any shares for
90 days after the date of this prospectus supplement
without first obtaining the written consent of the
representatives. Specifically, we and these other individuals
have agreed not to directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell or contract to sell any shares;
|
|
|
|
sell any option or contract to purchase any shares;
|
|
|
|
purchase any option or contract to sell any shares;
|
|
|
|
grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of any shares;
|
|
|
|
lend or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares;
|
|
|
|
request or demand that we file a registration statement related
to the shares; or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole
or in part, the economic consequence of ownership of any shares
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or
otherwise.
This lock-up
provision applies to shares and to securities convertible into
or exchangeable or exercisable for or repayable with shares. It
also applies to shares owned now or acquired later by the person
executing the agreement or for which the person executing the
agreement later acquires the power of disposition. These
restrictions do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares to the underwriters; or
|
|
|
|
the sale of shares to our Manager upon its reinvestment of fees
payable under the management services agreement.
|
New York
Stock Exchange Listing
The shares have been approved for listing on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol MIC, subject to notice of
issuance.
S-89
Price
Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids
Until the distribution of the shares is completed, SEC rules may
limit the underwriters and selling group members from bidding
for and purchasing our shares. However, the representatives may
engage in transactions that stabilize the price of the shares,
such as bids or purchases to peg, fix or maintain that price.
If the underwriters create a short position in the shares in
connection with the offering (i.e., if they sell more shares
than are listed on the cover of this prospectus supplement), the
representatives may reduce that short position by purchasing
shares in the open market. The representatives may also elect to
reduce any short position by exercising all or part of the
overallotment option described above. Purchases of the shares to
stabilize their price or to reduce a short position may cause
the price of the shares to be higher than it might be in the
absence of such purchases.
The representatives may also impose a penalty bid on
underwriters and selling group members. This means that if the
representatives purchase shares in the open market to reduce the
underwriters short position or to stabilize the price of
such shares, the representatives may reclaim the amount of the
selling concession from the underwriters and the selling group
members who sold those shares. The imposition of a penalty bid
may also affect the price of the shares in that it discourages
resales of those shares.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
the shares. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters
make any representation that the representatives will engage in
these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced,
will not be discontinued without notice.
U.K.
Selling Restrictions
Each underwriter has agreed that: (i) it has not offered or
sold and, prior to the expiry of a period of six months from the
closing date, will not offer or sell any shares of trust stock
to persons in the United Kingdom except to persons whose
ordinary activities involve them in acquiring, holding, managing
or disposing of investments (as principal or agent) for the
purposes of their businesses or otherwise in circumstances which
have not resulted and will not result in an offer to the public
in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Public Offers of
Securities Regulations 1995; (ii) it has only communicated
or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause
to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in
investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of
the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the
FSMA)) received by it in connection with the issue
or sale of any shares of trust stock in circumstances in which
section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuer; and
(iii) its offering has complied and will comply with all
applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done
by it in relation to the shares of trust stock in, from or
otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
No Public
Offering Outside the United States
No action has been or will be taken in any jurisdiction (except
in the United States and Canada) that would permit a public
offering of our shares or the possession, circulation or
distribution of this prospectus supplement or any other material
relating to us or our shares in any jurisdiction where action
for that purpose is required. Accordingly, our shares may not be
offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and neither this
prospectus supplement nor any other offering material or
advertisements in connection with our shares may be distributed
or published, in or from any country or jurisdiction except in
compliance with any applicable rules and regulations of any such
country or jurisdiction.
Purchasers of the shares offered by this prospectus supplement
may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges in
accordance with the laws and practices of the country of
purchase in addition to the offering price on the cover page of
this prospectus supplement.
Other
Relationships
Macquarie Securities (USA) Inc., an underwriter, is an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of Macquarie Bank Limited. Macquarie
Infrastructure Management (USA) Inc., our Manager, is part of
the Macquarie
S-90
Group, and, as such, is an affiliate of Macquarie Securities
(USA) Inc. We have paid financial advisory fees to Macquarie
Securities (USA) Inc. in connection with the acquisitions and
financing of TGC, Trajen and our interest in IMTT Holdings of
approximately $5.0 million, $6.1 million and
$4.3 million, respectively, as well as $575,000 in
connection with establishing and amending our acquisition credit
facility and the other transactions referenced under
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions. In addition, Macquarie Securities (USA) Inc.
has been reimbursed for any
out-of-pocket
expenses it incurs in connection with providing such financial
advisory services. We have agreed that Macquarie Securities
(USA) Inc. will have preferred provider status in respect of any
financial advisory services to be contracted for by us or our
subsidiaries in the future.
Certain affiliates of Merrill Lynch & Co., Citigroup
Global Markets Inc., Macquarie Bank Limited, the parent company
of our Manager, and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are
lenders under the MIC Inc. acquisition credit facility, which is
expected to be repaid in part with the net proceeds of this
offering.
Some of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in,
are engaged in, and may in the future engage in, investment
banking and other commercial dealings in the ordinary course of
business with us and other members of the Macquarie Group. They
have received customary fees and commissions for these services.
Availability
of Prospectus Supplement Online
A prospectus supplement in electronic format will be made
available on the websites maintained by one or more of the lead
managers of this offering and may also be made available on
websites maintained by other underwriters. The underwriters may
agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to
their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions
will be allocated by the lead managers to underwriters that may
make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
S-91
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the securities offered in this prospectus
supplement and accompanying prospectus is being passed upon for
us by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington,
Delaware. Certain legal matters in connection with the
securities offered hereby will be passed upon for us by
Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, New York. Certain
legal matters will be passed upon on behalf of the underwriters
by Sidley Austin
llp, New York, New
York.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Macquarie
Infrastructure Company Trust as of December 31, 2005 and
2004, and the year ended December 31, 2005 and the period
April 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity
(deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of
North America Capital Holding Company for the periods
January 1, 2004 through July 29, 2004, July 30,
2004 through December 22, 2004, and for the year ended
December 31, 2003, and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005 have been incorporated by reference
herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference
herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The report of KPMG LLP dated March 10, 2006, except as to
the fifth and sixth paragraphs of Managements Report on
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (as restated), which
are as of October 13, 2006, on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses such
firms opinion that Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust
did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of
a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the
control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that
states as a result of its evaluation of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting, management has
identified a material weakness. Specifically, the internal
accounting staff did not possess sufficient technical expertise
to ensure the correct application of hedge accounting in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. This material weakness resulted in the
restatement of previously filed unaudited financial statements
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006, as well as unaudited 2005 quarterly financial statements.
The report of KPMG LLP dated March 10, 2006, except as to
the fifth and sixth paragraphs of Managements Report on
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (as restated), which
are as of October 13, 2006, on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, contains an
explanatory paragraph that states Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust acquired Eagle Aviation Resources, Ltd. (EAR), on
August 12, 2005, and acquired SunPark on October 3,
2005. Management excluded from its assessment of the
effectiveness of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trusts
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, both EARs and SunParks
internal control over financial reporting. The EAR assets
represent 4.6% of the Companys total assets at
December 31, 2005, and generated 4.1% of the Companys
total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005. The
SunPark assets represent 5.5% of the Companys total assets
at December 31, 2005 and generated 1% of the Companys
total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Such firms audit of internal control over financial
reporting of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust also
excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial
reporting of both EAR and SunPark.
The consolidated balance sheet of Connect M1-A1 Holdings Limited
and subsidiary, as of March 31, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
deficit and other comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for
the year ended March 31, 2006, incorporated in this
prospectus by reference from the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 29, 2006, have been
audited by KPMG LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their
report, which is incorporated herein
S-92
by reference, and has been so incorporated in reliance upon the
report of such firm given upon their authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of K-1 HGC Investment, LLC
and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and for the period
from July 1, 2005 to April 30, 2006, and as of
June 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the year ended
June 30, 2005 and the period from August 8, 2003 (date
of inception) to June 30, 2004, incorporated in this
prospectus supplement by reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 27, 2006, have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated
in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference,
and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of
such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting
and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Loving Enterprises,
Inc. (currently known as IMTT Holdings, Inc.) as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005 appearing in the
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 16, 2006 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon dated
April 14, 2006 included therein, and incorporated herein by
reference. Such financial statements are, and audited financial
statements of IMTT Holdings, Inc. to be included in subsequently
filed documents of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and
Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC will be, incorporated
herein in reliance upon the reports of Ernst & Young
LLP pertaining to such financial statements (to the extent
covered by consents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission) given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Eagle Aviation
Resources, Ltd. as of December 31, 2004, and the related
statement of income, members equity, and cash flows for
the year then ended, incorporated in this prospectus supplement
by reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 4, 2005, have been audited
by L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC, independent auditors,
as stated in their report, which are incorporated herein by
reference, and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the
reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
document we file with the SEC at the SECs public reference
room at Room 1580, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for information on the operations of the public reference room.
The SEC maintains a website that contains annual, quarterly and
current reports, proxy and information statements and other
information that issuers (including Macquarie Infrastructure
Company) file electronically with the SEC. The SECs
website is www.sec.gov.
In addition, our SEC filings and other information about us may
also be obtained from our website at
www.macquarie.com/mic, although information on our
website does not constitute a part of this prospectus
supplement. Our shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol MIC, and all
reports, proxy statements and other information filed by us with
the NYSE may be inspected at the NYSEs offices at
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information we file with them, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those documents
that are considered part of this prospectus supplement. Later
information that we file will automatically update and supersede
this information. We incorporate by reference the documents
listed below and any future filings we make with the SEC under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until
the offering of the shares of trust stock
S-93
covered by this prospectus supplement has been completed. This
prospectus is part of a registration statement filed with the
SEC.
We are incorporating by reference into this prospectus
supplement the following documents filed with the SEC (excluding
any portions of such documents that have been
furnished but not filed for purposes of
the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (as amended and
restated by our
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on October 16, 2006);
|
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006 (each as amended and restated by our
Forms 10-Q/A
filed with the SEC on October 16, 2006);
|
|
|
|
Our revised definitive Proxy Statement dated April 19,
2006; and
|
|
|
|
Our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 16, 2005 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on October 4, 2005), April 17, 2006, April 19,
2006, May 2, 2006 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on May 16, 2006), June 12, 2006 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on June 27, 2006 and our Form 8-K on October 16,
2006), June 28, 2006, June 29, 2006, July 13,
2006, July 14, 2006, August 21, 2006, August 22,
2006, August 28, 2006 (as amended by our
Form 8-K
on October 16, 2006), September 7, 2006, September 14,
2006, September 25, 2006, October 2, 2006,
October 16, 2006 and October 16, 2006.
|
The documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement are available from us upon request. We will provide a
copy of any and all of the information that is incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement to any person, without
charge, upon written or oral request. Requests for such copies
should be directed to the following:
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust
125 West 55th Street
New York, NY 10019
Attention: Investor Relations
S-94
GLOSSARY
OF DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Definition
|
|
Atlantic FBO Holdco
|
|
Atlantic Aviation FBO Inc.
(formerly known as North America Capital Holding Company), the
holding company for our airport services business
|
CHL
|
|
Connect M1-A1 Limited, the holding
company for our toll road business
|
Company
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure Company
LLC
|
DCA
|
|
Hawaii Division of Consumer
Advocacy
|
DOT
|
|
Hawaii Department of
TransportationHarbors Division
|
EBITDA
|
|
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization
|
Exchange Act
|
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended
|
FBO
|
|
Fixed base operation
|
HPUC
|
|
Hawaii Public Utilities
Commission, the regulator of the utility operations of our gas
production and distribution business
|
IBF
|
|
The Macquarie Groups IB
Funds division
|
IMTT
|
|
International-Matex Tank
Terminals, the operating company for our bulk liquid storage
terminal business
|
IMTT Holdings
|
|
IMTT Holdings Inc. (formerly known
as Loving Enterprises, Inc.), the holding company for our bulk
liquid storage terminal business
|
LPG
|
|
Liquefied petroleum gas
|
Manager or MIMUSA
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure
Management (USA) Inc., our Manager
|
MBL
|
|
Macquarie Bank Limited
|
MCG
|
|
Macquarie Communications
Infrastructure Group
|
MIC
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure Company,
and, as used herein, each of these terms refers to the trust and
the company and its subsidiaries together
|
MIC Inc.
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure Company
Inc., the holding company for our businesses located in the
United States
|
MIIF
|
|
Macquarie International
Infrastructure Fund Limited
|
MLH
|
|
MEIF Luxembourg Holdings SA
|
NYH
|
|
New York Harbor
|
NYSE
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
PFA
|
|
Petroleum Feedstock Agreement
|
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Securities Act
|
|
Securities Act of 1933, as amended
|
SEW
|
|
South East Water, the water
utility in Southeast England in which we had an investment
|
SNG
|
|
Synthetic natural gas
|
TGC
|
|
The Gas Company, LLC, the
operating company for our gas production and distribution
business
|
Therms
|
|
Thermal units (1 Therm is the
equivalent of 100,000 British Thermal Units)
|
Trajen
|
|
Trajen Holdings, Inc.
|
Trust
|
|
Macquarie Infrastructure Company
Trust
|
USW
|
|
United Steel Workers
|
V&A
|
|
Vegetable and animal oil
|
YLL
|
|
Yorkshire Link, the toll road
operated by our toll road business
|
S-95
PROSPECTUS
Trust Stock
Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust
Each Share of Trust Stock
Represents One Beneficial Interest in the Trust
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust may sell, and Macquarie
Infrastructure Management (USA) Inc., our Manager, as a selling
stockholder, may sell, from time to time, shares of trust stock,
each representing one beneficial interest in the trust. The
purpose of the trust is to hold 100% of the interests of
Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC. Each beneficial interest
in the trust corresponds to one interest of Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC. We may, and our Manager may, offer
for sale the shares covered by this prospectus directly to
purchasers or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, in
public or private transactions, at prevailing market prices or
at privately negotiated prices, including in satisfaction of
certain contractual obligations. For additional information on
the methods of sale, you should refer to the section of this
prospectus entitled Plan of Distribution. Unless
otherwise set forth in a prospectus supplement, we will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by our Manager.
The shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
MIC.
We will provide more specific information about the terms of an
offering of these shares of trust stock in supplements or term
sheets to this prospectus. This prospectus may not be used to
offer or sell shares of trust stock unless accompanied by a
prospectus supplement or term sheet. You should read this
prospectus, the prospectus supplements and term sheets carefully
before you invest. If any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents
are involved in any offering, the names of such underwriters,
broker-dealers or agents and any applicable commissions or
discounts will be described in the applicable prospectus
supplement or term sheet relating to the offering.
Investing in the shares involves risks that are described in
the Risk Factors section beginning on page 4 of
this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is October 16, 2006.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Australian banking regulations that govern the operations of
Macquarie Bank Limited and all of its subsidiaries, including
our Manager, require the following statements: Investments in
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust are not deposits with or
other liabilities of Macquarie Bank Limited or of any Macquarie
Group company and are subject to investment risk, including
possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal
invested. Neither Macquarie Bank Limited nor any other member
company of the Macquarie Group guarantees the performance of
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust or the repayment of
capital from Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information different from that contained in this prospectus.
This prospectus may be used only for the purpose for which it
has been published, and no person has been authorized to give
any information not contained in this prospectus. If you receive
any other information, you should not rely on it. We are not
making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where
the offer is not permitted.
i
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement on
Form S-3
that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC, using a shelf registration process. Under this
shelf process, we may, and our Manager may, sell the shares
covered by this prospectus in one or more offerings. Because we
are a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act,
we may, from time to time, add and offer additional shares of
trust stock by filing a prospectus supplement or term sheet with
the SEC at the time of the offer.
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT OR TERM SHEET
This prospectus provides you with a general description of the
shares of trust stock that we or our Manager may offer. Each
time that we or our Manager offer shares of trust stock, we will
provide a prospectus supplement or term sheet that will contain
specific information about the terms of that offering. The
prospectus supplement or term sheet may also add to, update or
change information contained in this prospectus. Any statement
that we make in this prospectus will be modified or superseded
by any inconsistent statement made by us in a prospectus
supplement or term sheet. You should read both this prospectus
and any accompanying prospectus supplement or term sheet
together with the additional information described under the
heading Incorporation of Certain Documents by
Reference.
The prospectus supplement or term sheet to be attached to the
front of this prospectus will describe: the applicable public
offering price, the price paid for the shares of trust stock,
the net proceeds, the manner of distribution and any
underwriting compensation and the other specific material terms
related to the offering of shares of trust stock covered by this
prospectus.
For more detail on the terms of the shares of trust stock
offered, see Description of Shares.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
We have included or incorporated by reference into this
prospectus, and from time to time may make in our public
filings, press releases or other public statements, certain
statements that may constitute forward-looking statements. These
include without limitation those under the headings
Macquarie Infrastructure Company and Risk
Factors, as well as those contained in any prospectus
supplement or term sheet or in any document incorporated by
reference into this prospectus. In addition, our management may
make forward-looking statements to analysts, investors,
representatives of the media and others. These forward-looking
statements are not historical facts and represent only our
beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature,
are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. We may, in some
cases, use words such as project,
believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend,
should, would, could,
potentially, or may or other words that
convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to identify
these forward-looking statements.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are
identifying important factors that, individually or in the
aggregate, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those contained in any forward-looking statements made by us.
Any such forward-looking statements are qualified by reference
to the following cautionary statements.
Forward-looking statements in this prospectus and any prospectus
supplement or term sheet (including any documents incorporated
by reference herein or therein) are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control,
including, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our short operating history;
|
|
|
|
our limited ability to remove our Manager for underperformance
and our Managers right to resign;
|
|
|
|
our holding company structure, which may limit our ability to
meet our dividend policy;
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to service, comply with the terms of and refinance
at maturity our substantial indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
decisions made by persons who control the businesses in which we
hold less than majority control, including decisions regarding
dividend policies;
|
|
|
|
our ability to make, finance and integrate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to implement our operating and internal growth
strategies;
|
|
|
|
the regulatory environment in which our businesses and the
businesses in which we hold investments operate and our ability
to comply with any changes thereto, rates implemented by
regulators of our businesses and the businesses in which we hold
investments, and our relationships and rights under concessions
and contracts with governmental agencies and authorities;
|
|
|
|
changes in patterns of commercial or general aviation air
travel, or automobile usage, including the effects of changes in
airplane fuel and gas prices, and seasonal variations in
customer demand for our businesses;
|
|
|
|
changes in electricity or other power costs;
|
|
|
|
the competitive environment in which our businesses and the
businesses in which we hold investments operate;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic, business or demographic conditions
or trends, or changes in the political environment, level of
tourism or construction and transportation costs, in the United
States and other countries in which we have a presence,
including changes in interest rates and inflation;
|
|
|
|
environmental risks pertaining to our businesses and the
businesses in which we hold investments;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain or replace qualified employees;
|
|
|
|
work interruptions or other labor stoppages at our businesses or
the businesses in which we hold investments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the current treatment of qualified dividend income
and long-term capital gains under current U.S. federal
income tax law and the qualification of our income and gains for
such treatment;
|
|
|
|
disruptions or other extraordinary or force majeure events
affecting the facilities or operations of our businesses and the
businesses in which we hold investments and our ability to
insure against any losses resulting from such events or
disruptions;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in fuel costs, or the costs of supplies upon which
our gas production and distribution business is dependent, and
our ability to recover increases in these costs from customers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to make alternate arrangements to account for any
disruptions that may affect the facilities of the suppliers or
the operation of the barges upon which our gas production and
distribution business is dependent; and
|
|
|
|
changes in U.S. domestic demand for chemical, petroleum and
vegetable and animal oil products, the relative availability of
tank storage capacity and the extent to which such products are
imported.
|
Our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities
could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by
the forward-looking statements. A description of risks that
could cause our actual results to differ appears under the
caption Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
prospectus and in the
iii
documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus. It is
not possible to predict or identify all risk factors and you
should not consider that description to be a complete discussion
of all potential risks or uncertainties that could cause our
actual results to differ.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you
should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. The future events discussed in this prospectus may
not occur. These forward-looking statements are made as of the
date of this prospectus. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. You
should, however, consult further disclosures we may make in
future filings with the SEC.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are required to comply with the reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, and, in accordance with those requirements, we file
combined annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
document we file at the SECs public reference room located
at Room 1580, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SECs toll-free number at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the public reference room. Our SEC
filings are also available to the public from the SECs
website at www.sec.gov and can be found by searching the
EDGAR archives on the website. In addition, our SEC filings and
other information about us may also be obtained from our website
at www.macquarie.com/mic, although information on our
website does not constitute a part of this prospectus. Our
shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under
the symbol MIC and all reports, proxy statements and
other information filed by us with the NYSE may be inspected at
the NYSEs offices at 20 Broad Street, New York, New
York 10005.
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-3
to register with the SEC the securities covered by this
prospectus. This prospectus is a part of the registration
statement and does not contain all the information in the
registration statement. Whenever a reference is made in this
prospectus to a contract or other document, the reference is
only a summary and you should refer to the exhibits that are a
part of the registration statement or our other SEC filings for
a copy of the contract or other document.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference the
information we file with them, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those documents
that are considered part of this prospectus. Later information
that we file will automatically update and supersede this
information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed
below and any future filings we make with the SEC under
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until
the offering of the particular securities covered by a
prospectus supplement or term sheet has been completed. This
prospectus is part of a registration statement filed with the
SEC.
We are incorporating by reference into this prospectus the
following documents filed with the SEC (excluding any portions
of such documents that have been furnished but not
filed for purposes of the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (as amended and
restated by our
Form 10-K/A
filed with the SEC on October 16, 2006);
|
|
|
|
Our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006 (each as amended and restated by our
Forms 10-Q/A
filed with the SEC on October 16, 2006);
|
|
|
|
The description of our shares of trust stock set forth in our
registration statement in Form 8-A filed pursuant to Section 12
of the Exchange Act on December 13, 2004;
|
|
|
|
Our revised definitive Proxy Statement dated April 19,
2006; and
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
Our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 16, 2005 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on October 4, 2005), April 17, 2006, April 19,
2006, May 2, 2006 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on May 16, 2006), June 12, 2006 (as amended by our
Form 8-K/A
on June 27, 2006 and our
Form 8-K
on October 16, 2006), June 28, 2006, June 29,
2006, July 13, 2006, July 14, 2006, August 21,
2006, August 22, 2006, August 28, 2006 (as amended by
our
Form 8-K
on October 16, 2006), September 7, 2006, September 14,
2006, September 25, 2006, October 2, 2006,
October 16, 2006 and October 16, 2006.
|
The documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus are
available from us upon request. We will provide a copy of any
and all of the information that is incorporated by reference in
this prospectus to any person, without charge, upon written or
oral request. Requests for such copies should be directed to the
following:
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust
125 West 55th Street
New York, NY 10019
Attention: Investor Relations
Except as provided above, no other information, including, but
not limited to, information on our website, is incorporated by
reference in this prospectus.
v
MACQUARIE
INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust, a Delaware statutory
trust that we refer to as the trust, owns its businesses and
investments through Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company that we refer to as the
company. Except as otherwise specified, Macquarie
Infrastructure Company, we, us,
and our refer to both the trust and the company and
its subsidiaries together. The company owns the businesses
located in the United States through a Delaware corporation,
Macquarie Infrastructure Company Inc., or MIC Inc., and those
located outside of the United States through Delaware limited
liability companies. Macquarie Infrastructure Management (USA)
Inc., the company that we refer to as our Manager, is part of
the Macquarie Group of companies. References to the Macquarie
Group include Macquarie Bank Limited and its subsidiaries and
affiliates worldwide.
General
The trust and the company were each formed on April 13,
2004. On December 21, 2004, we completed our initial public
offering and concurrent private placement of shares of trust
stock representing beneficial interests in the trust. Each share
of trust stock corresponds to one LLC interest of the company.
We used the majority of the proceeds of the offering and private
placement to acquire our initial businesses and investments and
to pay related expenses.
We own, operate and hold investments in a diversified group of
infrastructure businesses primarily in the United States.
Traditionally, infrastructure businesses have been owned by
governments or private investors or have formed part of
vertically integrated companies. By owning shares of our trust
stock, investors have an opportunity to participate directly in
the ownership of these businesses.
Our new businesses, all of which we acquired in the last six
months, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
The Gas Company, or TGC, a gas production and distribution
business in Hawaii;
|
|
|
|
a 50% ownership interest in IMTT Holdings, the owner/operator of
a bulk liquid storage terminal business, International-Matex
Tank Terminals, or IMTT; and
|
|
|
|
Trajen Holdings, which owns and operates 23 fixed base
operations, or FBOs, that are being integrated into our existing
airport services business, Atlantic Aviation.
|
Our existing businesses consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Aviation, an airport services business that operates 19
FBOs in the United States;
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Parking, an off-airport parking business; and
|
|
|
|
a district energy business, conducted through Thermal Chicago
and Northwind Aladdin.
|
In August 2006, we disposed of our investment in Macquarie
Communications Infrastructure Group, or MCG, and in October
2006, we disposed of our 17.5% interest in the holding company
that owns South East Water, or SEW, a regulated water utility in
southeastern England. Additionally, in August 2006, we entered
into an agreement to dispose of our interest in the holding
company that owns 50% of the company that operates Yorkshire
Link, or YLL, a
19-mile toll
road south of Leeds in England. In September 2006, our 50%
partners in this holding company exercised their
pre-emptive
rights over our interest. We expect this transaction to close by
the end of February 2007.
Our
Manager
We have entered into a management services agreement with our
Manager. Our Manager is responsible for our
day-to-day
operations and affairs and oversees the management teams of our
operating businesses. Neither the trust nor the company has or
will have any employees. Our Manager has the right to assign, or
second, to the company, on a permanent and wholly dedicated
basis, employees to assume the offices of chief executive
officer and chief financial officer and makes other personnel
available as required.
1
The services performed for the company are provided at our
Managers expense, including the compensation of our
seconded officers.
We pay our Manager a management fee based primarily on our
market capitalization. In addition, to incentivize our Manager
to maximize shareholder returns, we may pay performance fees
based on criteria set forth in the management services
agreement. Our Manager can earn a performance fee equal to 20%
of the outperformance, if any, of quarterly total returns to our
shareholders above a weighted average of two benchmark indices,
a U.S. utilities index and a European utilities index,
weighted in proportion to our U.S. and
non-U.S. equity
investments. To be eligible for the performance fee, our Manager
must deliver total shareholder returns for the quarter that are
positive. Any underperformance from prior periods is carried
over to subsequent periods and must be exceeded in such
subsequent period for our Manager to be eligible for the
performance fee.
Our Manager is a member of the Macquarie Group, which, together
with its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide, provides
specialist investment, advisory, trading and financial services
in select markets around the world. The Macquarie Group is
headquartered in Sydney, Australia and is a global leader in
advising on the acquisition, financing and development of
infrastructure assets and the management of infrastructure
investment vehicles on behalf of third-party investors.
We believe that the Macquarie Groups demonstrated
expertise and experience in the management, acquisition and
funding of infrastructure businesses provide us with a
significant advantage in pursuing our strategy. Our Manager is
part of the Macquarie Groups IB Funds division, or IBF,
which as of June 30, 2006 managed approximately
$27 billion of equity on behalf of retail and institutional
investors. Currently, the division manages a global portfolio of
99 assets across 24 countries, the majority of which are held
through its listed and unlisted funds and vehicles. These
businesses include toll roads, airports and airport-related
infrastructure, communications, media, electric and gas
distribution networks, water utilities, aged care, rail, tank
storage and ferry assets. The IBF division has been operating
since 1996 and currently has over 480 staff internationally,
with more than 50 executives based in the United States and
Canada.
We expect that the Macquarie Groups infrastructure
advisory division, with over 400 executives internationally,
including more than 90 executives in North America, is an
important source of acquisition opportunities and advice for us.
During 2005, the Macquarie Group globally advised on
infrastructure transactions valued at more than
$32 billion. The Macquarie Groups infrastructure
advisory division is separate from the IBF division.
Historically, the Macquarie Groups advisory group has
presented the various infrastructure investment vehicles in IBF
with a significant number of high quality infrastructure
acquisition opportunities.
Although it has no contractual obligation to do so, we expect
that Macquaries infrastructure advisory division will
continue to present our Manager with similar opportunities.
Under the terms of the management services agreement, our
Manager is obliged to present to us, on a priority basis,
acquisition opportunities in the United States that are
consistent with our strategy, as discussed below, and the
Macquarie Group is our preferred financial adviser.
We also believe that our relationship with the Macquarie Group
enables us to take advantage of its expertise and experience in
debt financing for infrastructure assets. As the typically
strong, stable cash flows of infrastructure assets are usually
able to support high levels of debt relative to equity, we
believe that the ability of our Manager and the Macquarie Group
to source and structure low-cost project and other debt
financing provides us with a significant advantage when
acquiring assets. We believe that relatively lower costs will
help us to maximize returns to shareholders from those assets.
Principal
Executive Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 125 West
55th Street, New York, NY 10019. Our telephone number
at that location is
(212) 231-1000.
You may also obtain additional information about us from our
website, www.macquarie.com/mic. Information on our
website is not a part of this prospectus.
2
SELLING
STOCKHOLDER
We may register shares of trust stock covered by this prospectus
for
re-offers
and resales by our Manager. Because we are a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act, we
may add secondary sales of the shares by our Manager by filing a
prospectus supplement or term sheet with the SEC. We may
register these shares to permit our Manager to resell its shares
when it deems appropriate. Our Manager may resell all, a portion
or none of its shares at any time and from time to time. Our
Manager may also sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of some or
all of its shares in transactions exempt from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act. We do not know when or in
what amounts our Manager may offer shares for sale under this
prospectus and any prospectus supplement or term sheet. We will
pay all expenses incurred with respect to the registration of
the shares owned by our Manager, other than underwriting fees,
discounts or commissions, which will be borne by our Manager. We
will provide you with a prospectus supplement or term sheet
naming our Manager, the amount of shares to be registered and
sold and any other terms of the shares being sold by our Manager.
Material
Relationships with the Selling Stockholders
The following discussion contains summary information regarding
our relationship with our Manager. For a more complete
discussion of our relationship with and related party
transactions involving various members of the Macquarie Group,
please see the section entitled Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions in our revised definitive Proxy
Statement, dated April 19, 2006, and our quarterly and
current reports which are incorporated by reference into this
prospectus.
Our
Managers Relationship with the Macquarie
Group
Our Manager is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Macquarie
Bank Limited.
Contractual
Arrangements
At the closing of our initial public offering, we entered into a
management services agreement with our Manager, providing for
its management of our
day-to-day
operations and affairs and oversight of the management teams of
our operating businesses. See Our Manager
Management Services Agreement for a further discussion of
the terms of this agreement.
Our Manager acquired 2,000,000 shares of trust stock from
the company concurrently with the closing of our initial public
offering with an aggregate purchase price of $50 million,
at a purchase price per share equal to the initial public
offering price of $25. Pursuant to the terms of the management
services agreement, our Manager may sell up to 65% of these
shares at any time and may sell the balance at any time from and
after December 21, 2007. In addition, our Manager may
elect, and has in the past elected, to reinvest all or any
portion of its management fees in shares of trust stock at a
price based on calculations set forth in the management services
agreement.
We entered into a registration rights agreement with our Manager
under which we agreed to register (i) 30% of the shares in
our Managers initial investment, as well as any shares
purchased by our Manager upon reinvestment of any of its
management fees, at any time upon reasonable request,
(ii) a further 35% of the shares in our Managers
initial investment as soon as reasonably possible following
December 21, 2005 and (iii) the balance of the shares
in our Managers initial investment as soon as reasonably
possible following December 21, 2007. In addition, our
Manager may also require us to include its shares in future
registration statements that we file, subject to cutback at the
option of the underwriters of any such offering.
3
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in the shares involves a number of risks. For a
discussion of risks related to our business, please see
Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our
amended Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on
October 16, 2006, and Part II, Item 1A Risk
Factors of our amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, all of which are
incorporated in this prospectus by reference. You should
carefully read and consider the risks described below and
elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as those described in the
documents we incorporate by reference, before investing in our
shares.
Risks
Related to Ownership of Our Trust Stock
Future
sales of shares may affect the market price of our
shares.
We cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of our
shares, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have
on the market price of our shares. Sales of substantial amounts
of our shares in the public market, or the perception that such
sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of
our shares and may make it more difficult for you to sell your
shares at a time and price which you deem appropriate.
The
market price and marketability of our shares may from time to
time be significantly affected by numerous factors beyond our
control, which may adversely affect our ability to raise capital
through future equity financings.
The market price of our shares may fluctuate significantly. Many
factors that are beyond our control may significantly affect the
market price and marketability of our shares and may adversely
affect our ability to raise capital through equity financings.
These factors include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the stock markets generally;
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of registered investment companies, business
development companies or companies in our sectors, which may not
be related to the operating performance of these companies;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our earnings caused by marking to market on a
quarterly basis our derivative instruments;
|
|
|
|
changes in our earnings or variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in revenue or net income or any increase in losses
from levels expected by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax law;
|
|
|
|
operating performance of companies comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors; and
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source.
|
4
Certain
provisions of the management services agreement, the second
amended and restated operating agreement of the company, the
second amended and restated trust agreement and other agreements
make it difficult for third parties to acquire control of the
trust and the company and could deprive you of the opportunity
to obtain a takeover premium for your shares.
Under the terms of the management services agreement, our
Manager must significantly underperform in order for the
management services agreement to be terminated. The
companys board of directors cannot remove our Manager
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
our shares underperform a weighted average of two benchmark
utilities indices by more than 30% in relative terms and more
than 2.5% in absolute terms in 16 out of 20 consecutive quarters
prior to and including the most recent full quarter, and the
holders of a minimum of
662/3%
of the outstanding trust stock (excluding any shares of trust
stock owned by our Manager or any affiliate of the Manager) vote
to remove our Manager;
|
|
|
|
our Manager materially breaches the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continues unremedied for
60 days after notice;
|
|
|
|
our Manager acts with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement, or engages
in fraudulent or dishonest acts; or
|
|
|
|
our Manager experiences certain bankruptcy events.
|
Our Managers performance will be measured by the market
performance of our shares relative to a weighted average of two
benchmark utilities indices, a U.S. utilities index and a
European utilities index, weighted in proportion to our U.S. and
non-U.S. equity
investments. As a result, even if the absolute market
performance of our shares does not meet expectations, the
companys board of directors cannot remove our Manager
unless the market performance of our shares also significantly
underperforms the benchmark. If we were unable to remove our
Manager in circumstances where the absolute market performance
of our shares does not meet expectations, the market price of
our shares could be negatively affected.
In addition to the limited circumstances in which our Manager
can be terminated under the terms of the management services
agreement, the management services agreement provides that, in
circumstances where the trust stock ceases to be listed on a
recognized U.S. exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market
as a result of the acquisition of trust stock by third parties
in an amount that results in the trust stock ceasing to meet the
distribution and trading criteria on such exchange or market,
the Manager has the option to either propose an alternate fee
structure and remain our Manager or resign, terminate the
management services agreement upon 30 days written
notice and be paid a substantial termination fee. The
termination fee payable on the Managers exercise of its
rights to resign as our Manager subsequent to a delisting of our
shares could delay or prevent a change in control of the company
that may favor our shareholders. Furthermore, where our Manager
elects not to resign subsequent to a delisting and unless
otherwise approved in writing by our Manager, any proceeds from
the sale, lease or exchange of a significant amount of assets
must be reinvested in new assets of our company. We will also be
prohibited from incurring any new indebtedness or engaging in
any transactions with the shareholders of the trust, the company
or their respective affiliates without the prior written
approval of the Manager. These provisions could also delay or
prevent a change in control of the company that may favor our
shareholders.
The second amended and restated operating agreement of the
company, which we refer to as the LLC agreement, and the second
amended and restated trust agreement, which we refer to as the
trust agreement, contain a number of provisions that could have
the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to
acquire, or discouraging a third party from acquiring, control
of the trust and the company. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the companys ability to enter into certain
transactions with our major shareholders, with the exception of
our Manager, modeled on the limitation contained in
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law;
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
allowing only the companys board of directors to fill
vacancies, including newly created directorships, and requiring
that directors may be removed only for cause and by a
shareholder vote of
662/3%;
|
|
|
|
requiring that only the companys chairman or board of
directors may call a special meeting of our shareholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting shareholders from taking any action by written
consent;
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
candidates for election to the companys board of directors
or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by our
shareholders at a shareholders meeting;
|
|
|
|
having a substantial number of additional shares of authorized
but unissued trust stock;
|
|
|
|
providing the companys board of directors with broad
authority to amend the LLC agreement and the trust
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
requiring that any person who is the beneficial owner of ten
percent or more of our shares to make a number of
representations to the City of Chicago in its standard form of
Economic Disclosure Statement, or EDS.
|
In addition, most of the contracts governing our debt
arrangements contain change of control provisions that would
require repayment or cause a default in the event our Manager or
another member of the Macquarie Group ceases to manage the
company.
Risks
Related to Taxation
Shareholders
may be subject to taxation on their share of our taxable income,
whether or not they receive cash distributions from
us.
Shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation
and, in some cases, state, local, and foreign income taxation on
their share of our taxable income, whether or not they receive
cash distributions from us. Shareholders may not receive cash
distributions equal to their share of our taxable income or even
the tax liability that results from that income. In addition, if
we invest in the stock of a controlled foreign corporation (or
if one of the corporations in which we invest becomes a
controlled foreign corporation, an event which we cannot
control), we may recognize taxable income, which shareholders
will be required to take into account in determining their
taxable income, without a corresponding receipt of cash to
distribute to them.
If the
company fails to satisfy the qualifying income
exception, all of its income, including income derived from its
non-U.S. assets,
will be subject to an entity-level tax in the United States,
which could result in a material reduction in our
shareholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus could
result in a substantial reduction in the value of the
shares.
A publicly traded partnership will not be characterized as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes so long as
90% or more of its gross income for each taxable year
constitutes qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code. We refer to this exception as
the qualifying income exception. The company has concluded that
it is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. This conclusion is based upon the fact that:
(a) the company has not elected and will not elect to be
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes; and (b) for each taxable year, the company
expects that more than 90% of its gross income is and will be
income that constitutes qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code. Qualifying income includes
dividends, interest and capital gains from the sale or other
disposition of stocks and bonds. If the company fails to satisfy
the qualifying income exception described above,
items of income and deduction would not pass through to
shareholders and shareholders would be treated for
U.S. federal (and certain state and local) income tax
purposes as shareholders in a corporation. In such case, the
company would be required to pay income tax at regular corporate
rates on all of its income, including income derived from its
non-U.S. assets.
In addition, the
6
company would likely be liable for state and local income and/or
franchise taxes on all of such income. Distributions to
shareholders would constitute ordinary dividend income taxable
to such shareholders to the extent of the companys
earnings and profits, and the payment of these dividends would
not be deductible by the company. Taxation of the company as a
corporation could result in a material reduction in our
shareholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus could
result in a substantial reduction of the value of the shares.
The
current treatment of qualified dividend income and long-term
capital gains under current U.S. federal income tax law may
be adversely affected, changed or repealed in the
future.
Under current law, qualified dividend income and long-term
capital gains are taxed to non-corporate investors at a maximum
U.S. federal income tax rate of 15%. This tax treatment may
be adversely affected, changed or repealed by future changes in
tax laws at any time and is currently scheduled to expire for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2010.
7
USE OF
PROCEEDS
Unless indicated otherwise in the applicable prospectus
supplement or term sheet, we expect to use the net proceeds from
our sale of shares of trust stock under this prospectus for
general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to,
repayment or refinancing of borrowings, working capital, capital
expenditures, investments and acquisitions. Unless otherwise set
forth in the applicable prospectus supplement or term sheet, we
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by our
Manager. Additional information on the use of net proceeds from
the sale of securities offered by this prospectus may be set
forth in the prospectus supplement or term sheet relating to
such offering.
8
OUR
MANAGER
Management
Services Agreement
The company and its managed subsidiaries appointed Macquarie
Infrastructure Management (USA) Inc. as Manager pursuant to the
terms of a management services agreement. Under the management
services agreement, the companys direct, wholly owned
subsidiaries are referred to as managed subsidiaries. The
material elements of the management services agreement are
summarized below. The statements that follow are subject to and
are qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of the management services agreement, which is filed
as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on December 27, 2004, as amended by
amendment no. 1 to the agreement filed as an exhibit to our
amended Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Duties
of Our Manager
The management services agreement defines our Managers
duties and responsibilities. Subject to the oversight and
supervision of the companys board of directors, our
Manager manages the companys and the managed
subsidiaries
day-to-day
business and affairs. Neither the trust nor the company has any
employees. Our Manager has the right to second to the company,
on a permanent and wholly dedicated basis, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer. The companys board of
directors elects the seconded chief executive officer and chief
financial officer as officers of the company in accordance with
the terms of the LLC agreement as amended from time to time, and
the operating objectives, policies and restrictions of the
company in existence from time to time.
Our Manager agreed to perform the following duties:
|
|
|
|
|
cause the carrying out of all of the companys
day-to-day
management, secretarial, accounting, administrative, liaison,
representative, regulatory and reporting functions and
obligations and those of its managed subsidiaries and any such
obligations of the company with respect to the trust;
|
|
|
|
maintain the companys and managed subsidiaries books
and records consistent with industry standards and in compliance
with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Securities
Act and the Exchange Act and with GAAP;
|
|
|
|
identify, evaluate and recommend, through the companys
officers, acquisitions or investment opportunities from time to
time; and, if the companys board of directors approves any
acquisition or investment, negotiate and manage such
acquisitions or investments on the companys behalf; and
thereafter manage those acquisitions or investments, as a part
of the companys business under the management services
agreement, on behalf of the company and any relevant managed
subsidiary. To the extent acquisition or investment
opportunities covered by the priority protocol described below
are offered to our Manager or to entities that are managed by
subsidiaries of Macquarie Bank Limited within the IB Funds
division (or any such successor thereto) of the Macquarie Group,
our Manager will offer any such acquisition or investment
opportunities to the company in accordance with the priority
protocol described below unless our chief executive officer
notifies our Manager in writing that the acquisition or
investment opportunity does not meet the companys
acquisition criteria, as determined by the companys board
of directors from time to time. The company acknowledges and
agrees that (i) no Manager affiliate has any obligation to
offer any acquisition or investment opportunities covered by the
priority protocol described below to our Manager or to the IB
Funds division of the Macquarie Group, (ii) any Manager
affiliate is permitted to establish further investment vehicles
that will seek to invest in infrastructure businesses in the
United States, provided that the then-existing rights of the
company and the managed subsidiaries pursuant to the management
services agreement are preserved, and (iii) in the event
that an acquisition or investment opportunity is offered to the
company by our Manager and the company determines that it does
not wish to pursue the acquisition or investment opportunity in
full, any portion of the
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
opportunity which the company does not wish to pursue may be
offered to any other person, including a new investment vehicle
or any other investment vehicle managed by the Macquarie Group,
in the sole discretion of our Manager or any Manager affiliate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
attend to all matters necessary to ensure the professional
management of any business controlled by the company;
|
|
|
|
identify, evaluate and recommend the sale of all or any part of
the business that the company owns from time to time in
accordance with the companys criteria and policies then in
effect and, if such proposed sale is approved by the
companys board of directors and the board of directors of
any relevant managed subsidiary, negotiate and manage the
execution of the sale on the companys behalf and on behalf
of any relevant managed subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
recommend and, if approved by the companys board of
directors, use its reasonable efforts to procure the raising of
funds whether by way of debt, equity or otherwise, including the
preparation, review, distribution and promotion of any
prospectus or offering memorandum in respect thereof, but
without any obligation to provide such funds;
|
|
|
|
recommend changes to the companys LLC agreement and the
management services agreement to the companys board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
recommend capital reductions, including repurchases of LLC
interests of the company and the corresponding shares of trust
stock, to the companys board of directors;
|
|
|
|
recommend to the companys board of directors and, as
applicable, the boards of directors of the managed subsidiaries
the appointment, hiring and dismissal (including all material
terms related thereto) of officers, staff and consultants to the
company, its managed subsidiaries and any of their subsidiaries,
as the case may be;
|
|
|
|
cause the carrying out of maintenance to, or development of, any
part of the business or any asset of the company or any managed
subsidiary approved by the companys board of directors;
|
|
|
|
when appropriate, recommend to the companys board of
directors nominees of the company as directors of the managed
subsidiaries and any of their subsidiaries or companies in which
the company, its managed subsidiaries or any of their
subsidiaries has made an investment;
|
|
|
|
recommend to the companys board of directors the payment
of dividends and interim dividends to its members;
|
|
|
|
prepare all necessary budgets for the company for submission to
the companys board of directors for approval;
|
|
|
|
make recommendations to the boards of directors of the company
and its managed subsidiaries for the appointment of auditors,
accountants, legal counsel and other accounting, financial or
legal advisers and technical, commercial, marketing or other
independent experts;
|
|
|
|
make recommendations with respect to the exercise of the voting
rights to which the company or any managed subsidiary is
entitled in respect of its investments;
|
|
|
|
recommend and, subject to approval of the companys board
of directors, provide or procure all necessary technical,
business management and other resources for the companys
subsidiaries, including the managed subsidiaries, and any other
entities in which the company has made an investment;
|
|
|
|
do all things necessary on its part to enable the companys
and, as applicable, each managed subsidiarys compliance
with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requirements of applicable law, including the rules and
regulations promulgated under the Securities Act or the Exchange
Act or the rules, regulations or procedures of any
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
foreign, federal, state or local governmental, judicial,
regulatory or administrative authority, agency or
commission; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any contractual obligations by which the company or any of its
managed subsidiaries is bound;
|
|
|
|
|
|
prepare and, subject to approval of the companys board of
directors, arrange to be filed on the companys behalf with
the SEC, any other applicable regulatory body, the NYSE or any
other applicable stock exchange or automated quotation system,
in a timely manner, all annual, quarterly, current and other
reports the company is required to file with the SEC pursuant to
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
|
|
|
|
attend to all matters necessary for any reorganization,
bankruptcy proceedings, dissolution or winding up of the company
or any of its managed subsidiaries subject to approval by the
relevant board of directors of the company or any such managed
subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
attend to the timely calculation and payment of taxes and the
filing of all tax returns by the company and each of its
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
attend to the opening, closing, operation and management of all
company and managed subsidiary bank accounts and accounts held
with other financial institutions, including making any deposits
and withdrawals reasonably necessary for the management of the
companys and the managed subsidiaries
day-to-day
operations;
|
|
|
|
cause the consolidated financial statements of the company and
its subsidiaries for each fiscal year to be prepared and
quarterly interim financial statements to be prepared in
accordance with applicable accounting principles for review and
audit as required by law;
|
|
|
|
recommend the arrangements for the holding and safe custody of
the companys property, including the appointment of
custodians or nominees;
|
|
|
|
manage litigation in which the company or any managed subsidiary
is sued or commence litigation after consulting with, and
subject to the approval of, the board of directors of the
company or such managed subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
carry out valuations of any of the companys assets or the
assets of any of its subsidiaries or arrange for such valuation
to occur as and when our Manager deems necessary or desirable in
connection with the performance of its obligations under the
management services agreement, or as otherwise approved by the
companys board of directors;
|
|
|
|
make recommendations in relation to and effect the entry into
insurance of the companys assets, or the assets of any of
its managed subsidiaries and their subsidiaries, together with
other insurances against other risks, including directors and
officers insurance, as our Manager and the board of directors of
the company or any managed subsidiary, as applicable, may from
time to time agree; and
|
|
|
|
provide all such other services as may from time to time be
agreed upon with the company, including any and all accounting
and investor relations services (such as the preparation and
organization of communications with shareholders and
shareholders meetings) and all other duties reasonably related
to
day-to-day
operations of the company and its managed subsidiaries.
|
In addition, our Manager must:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain professional indemnity insurance and fraud and other
insurance and maintain such coverage as is reasonable having
regard to the nature and extent of its obligations under the
management services agreement;
|
|
|
|
exercise all due care, loyalty, skill and diligence in carrying
out its duties under the management services agreement as
required by applicable law;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
provide the companys board of directors and/or the
compensation committee with all information in relation to the
performance of our Managers obligations under the
management services agreement as the companys board of
directors and/or the compensation committee may request;
|
|
|
|
promptly deposit all amounts payable to the company or the
managed subsidiaries, as the case may be, to a bank account held
in the companys name, or in the name of a managed
subsidiary, as applicable;
|
|
|
|
ensure that all of the companys property and that of the
managed subsidiaries is clearly identified as such, held
separately from property of our Manager and, where applicable,
in safe custody;
|
|
|
|
ensure that all of the companys property and that of the
managed subsidiaries (other than money to be deposited to any
company or managed subsidiary bank account, as the case may be)
is transferred to or otherwise held in the companys name
or in the name of a managed subsidiary, as the case may be, or
any nominee or custodian appointed by the company or a managed
subsidiary, as the case may be;
|
|
|
|
prepare detailed papers and agendas for scheduled meetings of
the board of directors (and all committees thereof) of the
company and the managed subsidiaries that, where applicable,
contain such information as is reasonably available to our
Manager to enable the boards of directors (and any such
committees) to base their opinion; and
|
|
|
|
in conjunction with the papers referred to in the bullet point
above, prepare or cause to be prepared reports to be considered
by the board of directors of the company or the managed
subsidiaries (or any applicable committee thereof) in accordance
with the companys internal policies and procedures
(1) on any acquisition, investment or sale of any part of
the business proposed for consideration by any such board of
directors or committee, (2) on the management of the
business and (3) otherwise in respect of the performance of
our Managers obligations under the management services
agreement, in each case that the company may require and in such
form that the company and our Manager agree upon or as otherwise
reasonably requested by any such board of directors (or any
applicable committee thereof).
|
In connection with the performance of its obligations under the
management services agreement, our Manager is required to obtain
approval of the companys and any relevant managed
subsidiarys board of directors, in each case in accordance
with the companys internal policy regarding action
requiring board approval or as otherwise determined by any such
board of directors (or any applicable committee thereof) or the
companys officers.
Board
Appointee
Pursuant to the terms of the management services agreement and
the LLC agreement, for so long as our Manager or any affiliate
of our Manager holds shares of trust stock with an aggregate
value of no less than $5 million, based on the per share
price of the shares sold in our initial public offering (as
adjusted to reflect any subsequent stock splits or similar
recapitalizations), our Manager has the right to appoint one
director to the companys board of directors and an
alternate for such appointee, and such director, or alternate,
if applicable, will serve as the chairman of the board of
directors. Our Managers appointees on the companys
board of directors are not required to stand for election by our
shareholders.
Our Managers appointees do not receive any compensation
(other than
out-of-pocket
expenses) and do not have any special voting rights. The
appointees of our Manager shall not participate in discussions
regarding, or vote on, any related party transaction in which
any affiliate of our Manager has an interest. The audit
committee of the board of directors is responsible for approving
all related party transactions.
12
Secondment
of Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Under the management services agreement, our Manager has the
right to second to us our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer on a permanent and wholly dedicated basis. The
companys board of directors elects the seconded chief
executive officer and chief financial officer as officers of the
company in accordance with the terms of the LLC agreement. Our
Manager and the companys board of directors agree from
time to time to second to the company one or more additional
individuals to serve as officers or otherwise of the company.
All seconded persons remain employees of, and are remunerated
by, our Manager or an affiliate of our Manager. Our Manager also
provides on a non-seconded basis and at its own cost other
personnel as required to meet its obligations under the
management services agreement.
Our Manager or an affiliate of our Manager determines and pays
the compensation of the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer with input from the companys board of
directors. In establishing the remuneration for the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, our Manager or an
affiliate of our Manager will take into account the following
considerations: the standard remuneration guidelines as adopted
by our Manager or an affiliate of our Manager from time to time;
assessment by our Manager or an affiliate of our Manager of the
respective individuals performance, our Managers
performance and the companys and its subsidiaries
performance, financial or otherwise; and assessment by the
companys board of directors of the respective
individuals performance and the performance of our Manager.
After consultation with our Manager, the companys board of
directors may at any time request that our Manager replace any
individual seconded to the company, and our Manager will, as
promptly as practicable, replace such individual.
The company provides any individuals seconded to the company
with adequate indemnities and maintains directors and officers
insurance in support of the indemnities. Our Manager is required
to reduce our management fees by the amount of any fees that any
individual seconded to the company or any staff member or
employee of our Manager or its affiliates receives as
compensation for serving as a director on the boards of
directors of the company, any of the companys subsidiaries
or any company in which the company or its subsidiaries has made
an investment.
Expenses
of the Company
The company and the managed subsidiaries have agreed jointly and
severally to pay, or indemnify and reimburse if incurred by our
Manager on the companys behalf, all costs incurred by our
Manager in relation to the proper performance of our
Managers powers and duties under the management services
agreement or in relation to the administration or management of
the company, which include, but are not limited to, costs
incurred with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the performance by our Manager of its obligations under the
management services agreement;
|
|
|
|
all fees required to be paid to the SEC;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition, disposition, insurance, custody and any other
transaction in connection with assets of the company or any
managed subsidiary and any proposed acquisition, disposition or
other transaction in connection with an investment, provided
that no reimbursement will be made except for costs that have
been authorized by the company and the relevant managed
subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
the administration or management of the company, the managed
subsidiaries and the business;
|
|
|
|
financing arrangements on behalf of the company or any managed
subsidiary or guarantees in connection with the company or any
managed subsidiary, including hedging costs;
|
|
|
|
stock exchange listing fees;
|
|
|
|
underwriting of any offer and sale of trust stock, including
underwriting fees, handling fees, costs and expenses, amounts
payable under indemnification or reimbursement provisions in the
underwriting agreement and any amounts becoming payable in
respect of any breach (other than
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
for negligence, fraud or breach of duty) by our Manager of its
obligations, representations or warranties (if any) under any
such underwriting agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
convening and holding meetings of holders of trust stock,
members or shareholders, as the case may be;
|
|
|
|
taxes incurred by our Manager on behalf of the company or any
subsidiary (including any amount charged by a supplier of goods
or services or both to our Manager by way of or as a
reimbursement for value added taxes) and financial institution
fees;
|
|
|
|
engagement of agents, valuers, contractors and advisers, whether
or not associates of our Manager;
|
|
|
|
engagement of accountants for the preparation and/or audit of
financial information, financial statements and tax returns of
the company and the managed subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
termination of the management services agreement and the
retirement or removal of our Manager and the appointment of a
replacement;
|
|
|
|
any court proceedings, arbitration or other dispute concerning
the company or any of the managed subsidiaries, including
proceedings against our Manager, except to the extent that our
Manager is found by a court to have acted with gross negligence,
willful misconduct, bad faith or reckless disregard of its
duties or engaged in fraudulent or dishonest acts;
|
|
|
|
advertising, investor relations and promotion of the
company; and
|
|
|
|
complying with any other applicable law or regulation.
|
Termination
of Management Services Agreement
The companys board of directors may terminate the
management services agreement and our Managers appointment
only if:
|
|
|
|
|
our shares underperform a weighted average of two benchmark
utilities indices by more than 30% in relative terms and more
than 2.5% in absolute terms in 16 out of 20 consecutive quarters
prior to and including the most recent full quarter, and the
holders of a minimum of
662/3%
of trust stock (excluding any shares of trust stock owned by our
Manager or any Manager affiliate) vote to remove our Manager
(see example of quarterly performance test calculation
below); or
|
|
|
|
our Manager materially breaches the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continues unremedied for
60 days after notice; or
|
|
|
|
our Manager acts with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement or engages
in fraudulent or dishonest acts; or
|
|
|
|
our Manager experiences certain bankruptcy events.
|
The management services agreement permits our Manager to resign
and terminate the management services agreement at any time with
90 days written notice to the company, and this right
is not contingent upon our finding a replacement. Australian
banking regulations that govern the operations of Macquarie Bank
Limited and all of its subsidiaries, including our Manager,
require that subsidiaries of Australian banks providing
management services have these resignation rights. If our
Manager resigns, it is under no obligation to find a replacement
before resigning. However, if our Manager resigns, until the
date on which the resignation becomes effective, it will, upon
request of the companys board of directors, use reasonable
efforts to assist the companys board of directors to find
replacement management.
14
If at any time the trust stock ceases to be listed on a
recognized U.S. exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market
as a result of the acquisition of trust stock by third parties
in an amount that results in the trust stock ceasing to meet the
distribution and trading criteria of such exchange or market,
then:
(i) unless otherwise approved in writing by our Manager:
(A) any proceeds from the sale, lease or exchange of the
assets of the company or any of its subsidiaries, subsequent to
the delisting of the trust stock, in one or more transactions,
which in aggregate exceed 15% of the value of the trust (as
calculated by multiplying the price per share of trust stock
stated in clause (i) of the definition of Termination
Fee below by the aggregate number of shares of trust stock
issued and outstanding, other than treasury shares, on the date
the trust stock ceases to be listed), shall be reinvested in new
assets of the company (other than cash or cash equivalents)
within six months of the date on which the aggregate proceeds
from such transaction or transactions exceed 15% of the value of
the trust;
(B) neither the company nor any of its subsidiaries shall
incur any new indebtedness or engage in any transactions with
the shareholders of the trust, the company or affiliates of
shareholders of the trust or the company; and
(C) the Macquarie Group shall no longer have any obligation
to provide investment opportunities to the company pursuant to
the priority protocol described below;
(ii) our Manager shall as soon as practicable provide a
proposal for an alternate method to calculate fees to act as
Manager on substantially similar terms as set forth in the
management services agreement to the companys board of
directors for approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed; or
(iii) our Manager may elect to resign and terminate the
management services agreement upon 30 days written
notice to the company and be paid the Termination Fee within
45 days of such notice.
Where:
Termination Fee means the amount calculated
as follows: the sum of (i) all accrued and unpaid base
management fees and performance fees for the period from the
previous applicable fiscal quarter end date to the date our
trust stock ceased to be listed, using the volume weighted
average price per share of trust stock, paid by an acquiror in
the transaction or series of transactions that led to the
delisting of the trust stock to calculate such fees, plus
(ii) (a) if the price per share of trust stock stated
in (i) above multiplied by the aggregate number of shares
of trust stock issued and outstanding, other than treasury
shares, on the date the trust stock ceased to be listed is less
than or equal to $500 million, 10% of such value, or
(b) if the price per share of trust stock stated in
(i) above multiplied by the aggregate number of shares of
trust stock issued and outstanding, other than treasury shares,
on the date the trust stock ceased to be listed is greater than
$500 million, $50 million plus 1.5% of such value in
excess of $500 million.
Upon the resignation of our Manager and the termination of the
management services agreement, or within 30 days of a
delisting of our shares of trust stock, unless otherwise
approved in writing by our Manager, the trust, the company and
its subsidiaries will cease using the Macquarie brand entirely,
including changing their names to remove any reference to
Macquarie. Similarly, if our Managers
appointment is terminated by the company, the trust, the company
and its subsidiaries will cease using the Macquarie brand within
30 days of termination.
Set out below is an example of the quarterly calculation of
Manager performance that will be performed pursuant to the terms
of the management services agreement. The results of the
calculations are rounded for use in the example below; however,
no rounding is applied under the terms of the management
services agreement.
15
Manager
Performance Test Example
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the previous
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
C1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the current
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
J1
|
|
=
|
|
U.S. net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
K1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
L1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
N1
|
|
=
|
|
Foreign net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
P1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Q1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
(1) Calculation
of performance test return for the period
Performance test return for the period
=
(C1 − B1)/B1
=
(1.1 − 1)/1
= 10%
This is the total return on the shares of trust stock for the
fiscal quarter.
(2) Calculation
of performance test benchmark return for the period
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the period
=
J1 × (L1 − K1)/K1
=
75% × (1.06 − 1.02)/1.02
=
2.94%
= Y1
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI Europe Utilities
Index over the period
=
N1 × (Q1 − P1)/P1
=
25% × (1.04 − 1)/1
= 1%
= Z1
Performance test benchmark return for the period
=
Y1 + Z1
=
2.94% + 1%
=
3.94%
This is the total return on the benchmark for the fiscal quarter
against which our Managers performance is assessed.
16
For our Manager to fail the performance test for the fiscal
quarter, the performance test return for the period must be less
than:
(A) 3.94% − 2.5%
=
1.44%
and
(B) 70%
of 3.94%
=
2.76%
As the performance test return is greater than (A) (the
performance test benchmark return minus 2.5% in absolute terms)
and (B) (the performance test benchmark return minus 30% in
relative terms), our Manager passed the test for the fiscal
quarter in the example above. Subject to a shareholder vote, we
can remove our Manager if it fails to pass the performance test
illustrated above in 16 out of 20 consecutive fiscal quarters.
Our
Managers Investment and Registration Rights
Concurrently with the closing of our initial public offering on
December 21, 2004, our Manager acquired
2,000,000 shares of trust stock with an aggregate purchase
price of $50 million, at a purchase price per share equal
to the initial public offering price, which we refer to as the
initial investment. Pursuant to the terms of the management
services agreement, our Manager may sell up to 65% of these
shares at any time and may sell the balance at any time from and
after December 21, 2007, the third anniversary of the
closing of our initial public offering.
On December 21, 2004, in connection with the closing of our
initial public offering, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with our Manager under which we agreed to register
(i) 30% of the shares in our Managers initial
investment, as well as any shares purchased by our Manager upon
reinvestment of any of its management fees, at any time upon
reasonable request, (ii) a further 35% of the shares in our
Managers initial investment as soon as reasonably possible
following December 21, 2005 and (iii) the balance of
the shares in our Managers initial investment as soon as
reasonably possible following December 21, 2007. In
addition, our Manager may also require us to include its shares
in future registration statements that we file, subject to
cutback at the option of the underwriters of any such offering.
Shares sold pursuant to any of these registration statements
will be freely tradable in the public market without restriction.
Acquisition
Opportunities
Our Manager has exclusive responsibility for reviewing and
making recommendations to the companys board of directors
with respect to acquisition opportunities and dispositions. In
the event that an opportunity is not originated by our Manager,
the companys board of directors must seek a recommendation
from our Manager prior to making a decision concerning any
acquisition or disposition.
Our Manager and its affiliates will refer to the companys
board of directors any acquisition opportunities in accordance
with the U.S. acquisition priorities below that are made
available by any source to the IB Funds division of the
Macquarie Group unless our chief executive officer determines
that such opportunity does not meet our acquisition criteria
adopted by the companys board of directors.
17
U.S. Acquisition
Priorities
The company has first priority ahead of all current and future
entities managed by our Manager or by members of the Macquarie
Group within the IB Funds division in each of the following
infrastructure acquisition opportunities that are within the
United States:
|
|
|
Sector
|
|
|
|
Airport fixed base operations
|
|
|
District energy
|
|
|
Airport parking
|
|
|
Regulated Assets (including, but
not limited to, electricity and gas transmission and
distribution and water services)
|
|
|
User pays assets, contracted
assets, and regulated assets (as defined below) that represent
an investment of greater than AUD 40 million, subject to
the following qualifications:
|
|
|
Roads
|
|
The company has second priority
after Macquarie Infrastructure Group, any successor thereto or
spin-off managed entity thereof or any one managed entity, or a
MIG Transferee, to which Macquarie Infrastructure Group has
transferred a substantial interest in its U.S. Assets;
provided that, in the case of such MIG Transferee, both
Macquarie Infrastructure Group and such entity are co-investing
in the proposed investment.
|
Airport ownership
|
|
The company has second priority
after Macquarie Airports (consisting of Macquarie Airports Group
(MAG) and Macquarie Airports (MAp)), any successor thereto or
spin-off managed entity thereof or any one managed entity, or a
MAp Transferee, to which Macquarie Airports has transferred a
substantial interest in its U.S. Assets; provided that, in
the case of such MAp Transferee, both Macquarie Airports and
such entity are co-investing in the proposed investment.
|
Communications
|
|
The company has second priority
after Macquarie Communications Infrastructure Group, any
successor thereto or spin-off managed entity thereof or any one
managed entity, or a MCG Transferee, to which Macquarie
Communications Infrastructure Group has transferred a
substantial interest in its U.S. Assets; provided that, in
the case of such MCG Transferee, both Macquarie Communications
Infrastructure Group and such entity are co-investing in the
proposed investment.
|
Regulated assets (including, but
not limited to, electricity and gas transmission and
distribution and water services):
|
|
The company has second priority
after Macquarie Essential Assets Partnership (MEAP) until such
time as MEAP has invested a further CAD 45 million in the
United States. Thereafter, the company will have first priority.
|
User pays assets means businesses that are
transportation-related and derive a majority of their revenues
from a per use fee or charge.
18
Contracted assets means businesses that derive a majority of
their revenues from long-term contracts with other businesses or
governments.
Regulated assets means businesses that are the sole or
predominant providers of at least one essential service in their
service areas and where the level of revenue earned or charges
imposed are regulated by government entities.
The company has first priority ahead of all current and future
entities managed by our Manager or any Manager affiliate in all
investment opportunities originated by a party other than our
Manager or any Manager affiliate where such party offers the
opportunity exclusively to the company and not to any other
entity managed by our Manager or any Manager affiliate within
the IB Funds division of the Macquarie Group.
Fees
The company and the managed subsidiaries will compensate our
Manager for managing our operations through base management fees
and performance fees, which are described below.
The company and the managed subsidiaries will pay our Manager a
base management fee each fiscal quarter for services provided in
the amount of (i) 0.375% per fiscal quarter of net
investment value up to $500 million,
(ii) $1.875 million per fiscal quarter plus
0.3125% per fiscal quarter of net investment value over
$500 million and up to $1.5 billion, or
(iii) $5 million per fiscal quarter plus
0.25% per fiscal quarter of net investment value over
$1.5 billion, in each case adjusted on a pro rata basis if
the fiscal quarter in respect of which the calculation is made
is the fiscal quarter commencing on the date of the closing of
this offering, less:
(A) the amount of any fees paid by the company or any of
its subsidiaries during the fiscal quarter to any individuals
seconded to the company or to any officer, director, staff
member or employee of our Manager or its affiliates, received as
compensation for serving as a director on the boards of
directors of the company, any of the companys subsidiaries
or any company in which the company or its subsidiaries has
invested, excluding amounts paid as reimbursement for expenses,
in each case to the extent such fees are not subsequently paid
to the company or any of its subsidiaries; less
(B) the amount of any management fees other than
performance-based management fees payable to our Manager or its
affiliates for that fiscal quarter (adjusted, to the extent
required, on a pro rata basis if the fiscal quarter in respect
of which the calculation is made is the fiscal quarter
commencing on the date of the closing of this offering) in
relation to its management of an investment vehicle in which the
company has invested (calculated in U.S. dollars using the
applicable exchange rate on the last business day of such fiscal
quarter) multiplied by the companys percentage ownership
in the investment vehicle on the last business day of the fiscal
quarter; provided that, to the extent that such management fee
accrues over a period in excess of any fiscal quarter, such
management fee for any fiscal quarter will be estimated by our
Manager and will be adjusted to actual in the fiscal quarter
such fee becomes available; and less
(C) all base management fees previously earned in any
fiscal quarter in relation to any future investment if it is
determined conclusively during the relevant fiscal quarter that
such future investment will not be completed.
For purposes of calculating the base management fees under the
management services agreement, net investment value is
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the volume-weighted average market capitalization of the trust
over the last 15 trading days of the quarter, or for the period
beginning on the closing date of this offering, such fewer
number of trading days from and including the first day of
trading for the trust stock to and including the last day of the
quarter (based on the volume-weighted average trading prices and
average number of outstanding shares of trust stock); plus
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of debt with recourse to the company or to its
managed subsidiaries excluding any debt incurred on behalf of
any subsidiary of a managed subsidiary; plus
|
|
|
|
the value of firm commitments for future investments, provided
such firm commitments have not been outstanding for more than
two consecutive fiscal quarters; and less
|
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents held by the company and its managed
subsidiaries, excluding amounts held for the benefit of any
subsidiary of a managed subsidiary.
|
The company will pay performance fees to our Manager based on
the total returns to shareholders, as measured by the return on
the company accumulation index, relative to those of a
benchmark. The benchmark is comprised of a weighted average of
the MSCI U.S. IMI/Utilities Index and the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars), both calculated on a
total return basis. The weightings used in the calculation of
the benchmark will be adjusted quarterly in advance to reflect
the fair values in U.S. dollars of our U.S. and
non-U.S. businesses
and investments. In the event that a more suitable benchmark
becomes available, the benchmark may be changed as agreed upon
by the company and our Manager.
Performance fees are calculated and payable quarterly in arrears
in the amount of 20% of outperformance of the company
accumulation index over the benchmark. Performance fees are
payable only if there is a positive total return in the company
accumulation index for the relevant quarter. If there is a
negative total return in the company accumulation index but the
company accumulation index outperforms the benchmark, such
outperformance is carried forward and included in the
calculation of performance fees in the subsequent period. Any
underperformance of the company accumulation index relative to
the benchmark is also carried forward and included in the
calculation of performance fees in the subsequent period.
In the event of an offering by the trust greater than or equal
to 15% of the total number of shares of trust stock issued and
outstanding (excluding any issuance of shares of trust stock to
the Manager upon reinvestment of management fees or in relation
to any dividend reinvestment plan or employee or director
benefit plan), the performance fee calculated in the fiscal
quarter in which the offering occurs will be adjusted to reflect
the performance of the price of such newly issued shares
relative to the performance of the benchmark for the period from
the date of such offering to the end of the relevant fiscal
quarter.
Base management fees and performance fees are due at the end of
the relevant fiscal quarter and are payable in cash by the
company and the managed subsidiaries. Our Manager may elect to
reinvest all or any portion of its fees in shares of trust
stock. If our Manager elects to reinvest its fees in shares of
trust stock, the price of the shares will be based on the
volume-weighted average trading price of our outstanding shares
over the 15 trading days beginning on the trading day
immediately following the record date for the payment of
dividends relating to the most recent fiscal quarter or,
otherwise, on the third trading day following an earnings
release relating to such fiscal quarter. The company will, and
will cause the trust to, at all times have reserved a sufficient
number of LLC interests and shares of trust stock, respectively,
to enable our Manager to invest all reasonably foreseeable fees
receivable in shares of trust stock.
By way of illustration, the tables below provide an example of a
quarterly base management fee calculation and three examples of
quarterly performance fee calculations. The results of the
calculations are rounded for use in the examples below; however,
no rounding is applied under the terms of the management
services agreement. The performance fee examples also assume
that there have been no adjustments required to reflect
offerings equal to or greater than 15% of the total number of
shares of trust stock issued and outstanding during the fiscal
quarter.
20
Base
Management Fee Example
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1
|
|
=
|
|
Average number of shares of trust
stock issued and outstanding over the last 15 trading days of
the fiscal quarter
|
|
|
25,000,000
|
|
A2
|
|
=
|
|
Volume-weighted average trading
price per share of trust stock over the last 15 trading days of
the fiscal quarter
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
A
|
|
=
|
|
Market value of the trust
stock (A) = (A1) (A2)
|
|
$
|
500,000,000
|
|
B
|
|
=
|
|
External borrowings of the company
and the managed subsidiaries at the end of the fiscal quarter
not on behalf of a subsidiary of a managed subsidiary
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
C
|
|
=
|
|
Future investments as at the end
of the fiscal quarter
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
D
|
|
=
|
|
Cash balances of the company and
the managed subsidiaries at the end of the fiscal quarter
excluding amounts held on behalf of any subsidiary of a managed
subsidiary
|
|
$
|
20,000,000
|
|
E
|
|
=
|
|
Non-performance-based management
fees earned by an affiliate of the Manager from the management
of a Macquarie Group managed investment vehicle in which the
company has an investment
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
F
|
|
=
|
|
The companys percentage
ownership in the Macquarie Group managed investment vehicle on
the last day of the fiscal quarter
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
G
|
|
=
|
|
Unreimbursed fees paid to
secondees or employees of the Manager
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
H
|
|
=
|
|
Base management fees previously
earned by the Manager on future investments not completed
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
The net investment value for the fiscal quarter is calculated as
follows:
=
A + B + C − D
=
$500,000,000 + $100,000,000 + $0 −
$20,000,000
=
$580,000,000
The base management fee for the fiscal quarter is calculated as
follows:
=
(applicable rate × net investment
value) − (E × F) −
G − H
=
$1,875,000 + (0.3125% × ($580,000,000 −
$500,000,000)) − ($1,000,000 × 15%) − 0 − 0
=
$1,875,000 + $250,000 − $150,000 − 0 − 0
=
$1,975,000
21
Performance
Fee Example 1 Outperformance and Performance Fee
Paid
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1/X1
|
|
=
|
|
Average market capitalization of
the trust over the last 15 trading days of the previous fiscal
quarter
|
|
$
|
500,000,000
|
|
B1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the previous
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
C1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the current
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
J1
|
|
=
|
|
U.S. net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
K1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
L1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
N1
|
|
=
|
|
Foreign net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
P1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Q1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
D
|
|
=
|
|
Deficit carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
S
|
|
=
|
|
Surplus carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
The performance fee is 20% of the return for the period above
the benchmark return for that period, after allowing for any
deficit or surplus carried forward from
previous periods.
(1) Calculation
of return for the period
Return for the period:
=
A1 × (C1 − B1)/B1
=
$500,000,000 × (1.05 − 1)/1
=
$25,000,000
Return for the period after allowing for any surplus carried
forward:
=
Return for the period + S
=
$25,000,000 + $0
=
$25,000,000
(2) Calculation
of benchmark return for the period
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the period:
=
J1 × (L1 − K1)/K1
=
65% × (1.02 − 1)/1
=
1.3%
= Y1
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI Europe Utilities
Index (in U.S. dollars) over the period:
=
N1 × (Q1 − P1)/P1
=
35% × (1.03 − 1)/1
=
1.05%
= Z1
Benchmark return for the period:
=
X1 × (Y1 + Z1)
=
$500,000,000 × (1.3% + 1.05%)
=
$11,750,000
22
Benchmark return for the period after allowing for deficit
carried forward:
=
Benchmark return for the period + D
=
$11,750,000 + $0
=
$11,750,000
Performance fee for the period:
=
20% × (return − benchmark return)
=
20% × ($25,000,000 − $11,750,000)
=
20% × ($13,250,000)
=
$2,650,000
As the return for the fiscal quarter is greater than the
benchmark return for the fiscal quarter, a performance fee is
payable in respect of the period to the order of $2,650,000.
Deficit carried forward to next period:
= $0
Performance
Fee Example 2 Underperformance and Deficit Carried
Forward
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1/X1
|
|
=
|
|
Average market capitalization of
the trust over the last 15 trading days of the previous fiscal
quarter
|
|
$
|
500,000,000
|
|
B1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the previous
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
C1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the current
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
J1
|
|
=
|
|
U.S. net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
K1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
L1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
N1
|
|
=
|
|
Foreign net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
P1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
Q1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
D
|
|
=
|
|
Deficit carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
S
|
|
=
|
|
Surplus carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
The performance fee is 20% of the return for the period above
the benchmark return for that period, after allowing for any
deficit or surplus carried forward from
previous periods.
(1) Calculation
of return for the period
Return for the period:
=
A1 × (C1 − B1)/B1
=
$500,000,000 × (1.02 − 1.05)/1.05
=
$−14,285,714
Return for the period after allowing for any surplus carried
forward:
=
Return for the period + S
=
$−14,285,714 + $0
=
$−14,285,714
23
(2) Calculation
of benchmark return for the period
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the period:
=
J1 × (L1 − K1)/K1
=
70% × (1.05 − 1.02)/1.02
=
2.06%
= Y1
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI Europe Utilities
Index (in U.S. dollars) over the period:
=
N1 × (Q1 − P1)/P1
=
30% × (1.06 − 1.03)/1.03
=
0.87%
= Z1
Benchmark return for the period:
=
X1 × (Y1 + Z1)
=
$500,000,000 × (2.06% + 0.87%)
=
$14,650,000
Benchmark return for the period after allowing for deficit
carried forward:
=
Benchmark return for the period + D
=
$14,650,000 + $0
=
$14,650,000
Performance fee for the period:
=
20% × (return 7 − benchmark return)
=
20% × (−$14,285,714 −
$14,650,000)
= $0
since
return < benchmark
return
As the return for the fiscal quarter is less than the benchmark
return for the fiscal quarter, no performance fee is payable in
respect of the period and a deficit is carried forward.
Deficit carried forward to next period:
=
$14,650,000 − −$14,285,714
=
$28,935,714
24
Performance
Fee Example 3 Outperformance and Performance Fee
Paid After Recovery of Carried Forward Deficit
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A1/X1
|
|
=
|
|
Average market capitalization of
the trust over the last 15 trading days of the previous fiscal
quarter
|
|
$
|
500,000,000
|
|
B1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the previous
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
C1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the company
accumulation index over the last 15 trading days of the current
fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
J1
|
|
=
|
|
U.S. net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
K1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
L1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the last 15 trading days of
the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
N1
|
|
=
|
|
Foreign net equity value on the
last business day of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
P1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the previous fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Q1
|
|
=
|
|
Average closing of the MSCI Europe
Utilities Index (in U.S. dollars) over the last 15 trading
days of the current fiscal quarter
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
D
|
|
=
|
|
Deficit carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
$
|
28,935,714
|
|
S
|
|
=
|
|
Surplus carried
forward from the previous period
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
The performance fee is 20% of the return for the period above
the benchmark return for that period, after allowing for any
deficit or surplus carried forward from
previous periods.
(1) Calculation
of return for the period
Return for the period:
=
A1 × (C1 − B1)/B1
=
$500,000,000 × (1.1 − 1.02)/1.02
=
$39,215,686
Return for the period after allowing for any surplus carried
forward:
=
Return for the period + S
=
$39,215,686 + $0
=
$39,215,686
(2) Calculation
of benchmark return for the period
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI
U.S. IMI/Utilities Index over the period:
= J1
× (L1 − K1)/K1
=
75% × (1.06 − 1.05)/1.05
=
0.71%
= Y1
Weighted average percentage change in MSCI Europe Utilities
Index (in U.S. dollars) over the period:
= N1
× (Q1 − P1)/P1
=
25% × (1.04 − 1.06)/1.06
=
−0.47%
= Z1
25
Benchmark return for the period:
= X1
× (Y1 + Z1)
=
$500,000,000 × (0.71% − 0.47%)
=
$1,200,000
Benchmark return for the period after allowing for deficit
carried forward:
=
Benchmark return for the period + D
=
$1,200,000 + $28,935,714
=
$30,135,714
Performance fee for the period:
=
20% × (return − benchmark return)
=
20% × ($39,215,686 − $30,135,714)
=
20% × ($9,079,972)
=
$1,815,994
As the return for the fiscal quarter is greater than the
benchmark return for the fiscal quarter after allowing for
recovery of the deficit carried forward from prior periods, a
performance fee is payable in respect of the period to the order
of $1,815,994.
Deficit carried forward to next period:
= $0
26
DESCRIPTION
OF SHARES
General
The following is a summary of the material terms of the shares
representing beneficial interests in Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust, which we refer to as the trust stock, and the
limited liability company interests of Macquarie Infrastructure
Company LLC, which we refer to as the LLC interests. The trust
agreement and the LLC agreement provide for the issuance of the
trust stock and LLC interests, respectively, and the
distributions on and voting rights of the trust stock and the
LLC interests, respectively. The following description is
subject to the provisions of the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act and the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.
Certain provisions of the LLC agreement and the trust agreement
are intended to be consistent with the Delaware General
Corporation Law, and the powers of the company, the governance
processes and the rights of the trust as the holder of the LLC
interests and the shareholders of the trust are generally
intended to be similar in many respects to those of a Delaware
corporation. In some instances, this summary refers to specific
differences between the rights of holders of trust stock or LLC
interests, on the one hand, and the rights of shareholders of a
Delaware corporation, on the other hand. Similarly, in some
instances this summary refers to specific differences between
the attributes of shares of trust stock or LLC interests, on the
one hand, and shares of stock of a Delaware corporation, on the
other hand. The statements that follow are subject to and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of each of the trust agreement and the LLC agreement,
which will govern your rights as a holder of the trust stock and
the trusts rights as a holder of LLC interests, each of
which is filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on September 7, 2005.
Authorized
Trust Stock
Each share of trust stock represents one beneficial interest in
the trust and each share of trust stock corresponds to one
underlying LLC interest of the company owned by the trust.
Unless the trust is dissolved, it must remain the sole holder of
100% of the LLC interests and at all times the company will have
outstanding the identical number of LLC interests as the number
of outstanding shares of trust stock. The trust is authorized to
issue 500,000,000 shares of trust stock and the company is
authorized to issue a corresponding number of LLC interests.
Currently, the trust has 27,212,165 shares outstanding, and
the company will have an equal number of corresponding LLC
interests outstanding. The trust cannot issue any other class of
trust stock, and the company does not intend to issue any other
class of LLC interests. All shares and LLC interests will be
fully paid and nonassessable upon payment therefor.
Dividends
The company, acting through its board of directors, declares and
pays dividends on the LLC interests to the trust as the sole
holder of those interests. Upon receipt of any dividends
declared and paid by the company, the trust is required,
pursuant to the terms of the trust agreement, to distribute the
whole amount of those dividends in cash to its shareholders, in
proportion to their percentage ownership of the trust, as they
appear on the share register on the related record date. The
board of directors may, in its sole discretion and at any time,
declare and pay dividends of the company and make and pay
distributions from the net cash flow to the holders of its LLC
interests. Net cash flow, for any period, is defined
as the gross cash proceeds of the company for such period less
the portion thereof used to pay or establish reserves for
company expenses, debt payments, capital improvements,
replacements and contingencies, all as determined by the board
of directors of the company. Net cash flow will not be reduced
by depreciation, amortization, cost recovery deductions or
similar allowances, but will be increased by any reductions of
reserves discussed in the prior sentence.
Voting
Rights
Each outstanding share of trust stock is entitled to one vote
for each share on any matter with respect to which the trust, as
sole member of the company, is entitled to vote, as provided in
the LLC agreement and as detailed below. Pursuant to the terms
of the LLC agreement and the trust agreement, unless the trust
is dissolved, it must remain the sole holder of the LLC
interests and, with respect to those matters subject to
27
vote by the members of the company, the company will act at the
direction of the trust. The company, as sponsor of the trust,
will provide to the trust, for transmittal to shareholders of
the trust, the appropriate form of proxy to enable shareholders
of the trust to direct, in proportion to their percentage
ownership of trust stock, the trusts vote. The trust will
vote its LLC interests in the same proportion as the vote of
holders of the trust stock. For the purposes of this summary,
the voting rights of members of the company that effectively
will be exercised by the shareholders of the trust by proxy will
be referred to as the voting rights of the holders of the trust
stock.
The LLC agreement provides that the members are entitled, at the
annual meeting of members of the company, to vote for the
election of all of the directors other than the director
appointed by our Manager. Because neither the trust agreement
nor the LLC agreement provides for cumulative voting rights, the
holders of a plurality of the voting power of the then
outstanding shares of the trust, the companys sole member,
represented at a meeting will effectively be able to elect all
the directors of the company standing for election.
Right
to Bring a Derivative Action and Enforcement of the Provisions
of the LLC Agreement by Holders of the
Trust Stock
The LLC agreement and the trust agreement both provide that a
holder of trust stock has the right to directly institute a
legal proceeding against the company to enforce the provisions
of the LLC agreement. In addition, the LLC agreement and the
trust agreement provide that holders of ten percent or more of
the outstanding shares of trust stock have the right to cause
the trust to bring a derivative action in the right of the
company under
Section 18-1001
of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.
Acquisition
Exchange and Optional Purchase
The LLC agreement and the trust agreement provide that, if at
any time more than 90% of the then outstanding shares of trust
stock are held by one person, whom we refer to as the acquirer,
such acquirer has the right to cause the trust, acting at the
direction of the companys board of directors, to
mandatorily exchange all shares of trust stock then outstanding
for an equal number of LLC interests, which we refer to as an
acquisition exchange, and dissolve the trust. The company, as
sponsor of the trust, will cause the transfer agent of the trust
stock to mail a copy of notice of such exchange to the
shareholders of the trust at least 30 days prior to the
exchange of shares of trust stock for LLC interests. Upon the
completion of such acquisition exchange, each holder of shares
of trust stock immediately prior to the completion of the
acquisition exchange will be admitted to the company as a member
in respect of an equal number of LLC interests and the trust
will cease to be a member of the company.
Following the exchange, the LLC agreement provides that the
acquirer has the right to purchase from the other members for
cash all, but not less than all, of the outstanding LLC
interests that the acquirer does not own. The acquirer can
exercise its right to effect such purchase by delivering notice
to the company of its election to make the purchase not less
than 60 days prior to the date which it selects for the
purchase. The company will use reasonable efforts to cause the
transfer agent to mail the notice of the purchase to the record
holders of the LLC interests at least 30 days prior to
purchase.
Upon the acquirers exercise of its purchase right, the LLC
agreement provides that members other than the acquirer shall be
required to sell all, but not less than all, of their
outstanding LLC interests at the offer price. The offer price
will be equal to the average closing price (as described below)
per share of trust stock or LLC interest, as applicable, on the
20 trading days immediately prior to, but not including, the
date of the acquisition exchange. While this provision of the
LLC agreement provides for a fair price requirement, the LLC
agreement does not provide members with appraisal rights that
shareholders of a Delaware corporation would be entitled to
under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
The closing price of the trust stock or LLC interests, as
applicable, on any date of determination means:
|
|
|
|
|
the closing sale price (or, if no closing price is reported, the
last reported sale price) of a share of trust stock or an LLC
interest, as applicable (regular way), on the NYSE on such date;
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
if the trust stock or the LLC interests are not listed for
trading on the NYSE on any such date, the closing sale price as
reported in the composite transactions for the principal
U.S. securities exchange on which the trust stock or the
LLC interests, as applicable, are so listed;
|
|
|
|
if the trust stock or the LLC interests, as applicable, are not
so listed on a U.S. national or regional securities
exchange, the price as reported by the Nasdaq National Market;
|
|
|
|
if the trust stock or the LLC interests, as applicable, are not
so reported, the last quoted bid price for the trust stock or
the LLC interests, as applicable, in the
over-the-counter
market as reported by the National Quotation Bureau or a similar
organization; or
|
|
|
|
if the trust stock or the LLC interests, as applicable, are not
so quoted, the average of the midpoint of the last bid and ask
prices for the trust stock or the LLC interests, as applicable,
from at least three nationally recognized investment firms that
the company selects for such purpose.
|
Mandatory
Exchange
The LLC agreement and the trust agreement provide that, in the
event the companys board of directors determines that
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the trust or the company, or both, is, or is reasonably likely
to be, treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes;
|
|
|
|
the trust is, or is reasonably likely to be, required to issue
Schedules K-1 to holders of trust stock; or
|
|
|
|
the existence of the trust otherwise results, or is reasonably
likely to result, in a material tax detriment to the trust, the
holders of trust stock, the company or any of the members,
|
and the board of directors obtains an opinion of counsel to such
effect, the company, as sponsor of the trust, must cause the
trust to exchange all shares of trust stock then outstanding for
an equal number of LLC interests, which we refer to as a
mandatory exchange, and dissolve the trust. The company, as
sponsor of the trust, will cause the transfer agent for the
trust stock to mail a copy of notice of such exchange to the
shareholders of the trust at least 30 days prior to the
mandatory exchange. Upon the completion of a mandatory exchange,
each holder of shares of trust stock immediately prior to the
completion of the mandatory exchange will be admitted to the
company as a member in respect of an equal number of LLC
interests and the trust will cease to be a member of the company.
Election
by the Company
In circumstances where the trust has been dissolved, the LLC
agreement provides that the board of directors may, without the
consent of the members, cause the company to elect to be treated
as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes only
if the board receives an opinion from a nationally recognized
financial adviser to the effect that the market valuation of the
company is expected to be significantly lower as a result of the
company continuing to be treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes than if the company
instead elected to be treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Dissolution
of the Trust and the Company
The LLC agreement provides for the dissolution and winding up of
the company upon the occurrence of:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of a resolution by a majority vote of the board of
directors approving the dissolution, winding up and liquidation
of the company and such action has been approved by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding LLC interests
entitled to vote thereon;
|
|
|
|
the unanimous vote of its members to dissolve, wind up and
liquidate the company; or
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
a judicial determination that an event has occurred that makes
it unlawful, impossible or impractical to carry on the business
of the company as then currently operated as determined in
accordance with
Section 18-802
of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.
|
Following the occurrence of a dissolution event with respect to
the company, each share of trust stock will be mandatorily
exchanged for an LLC interest and the company will then be
liquidated in accordance with the terms of the LLC agreement.
Upon liquidation and winding up of the company, the then holders
of LLC interests will be entitled to share ratably in the assets
of the company legally available for distribution following
payment to creditors.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
Certain provisions of the management services agreement, the
trust agreement and the LLC agreement may make it more difficult
for third parties to acquire control of the trust and the
company by various means. These provisions could deprive the
shareholders of the trust of opportunities to realize a premium
on the shares of trust stock owned by them. In addition, these
provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of
the trust stock. These provisions are intended to:
|
|
|
|
|
protect the position of our Manager and its rights to manage the
business and affairs of the company under the management
services agreement;
|
|
|
|
enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the
composition of the board of directors of the company and in the
policies formulated by the board;
|
|
|
|
discourage certain types of transactions which may involve an
actual or threatened change in control of the trust and the
company;
|
|
|
|
discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights;
|
|
|
|
encourage persons seeking to acquire control of the trust and
the company to consult first with the board of directors of the
company to negotiate the terms of any proposed business
combination or offer; and
|
|
|
|
reduce the vulnerability of the trust and the company to an
unsolicited proposal for a takeover that does not contemplate
the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of trust stock
or that is otherwise unfair to shareholders of the trust.
|
Anti-Takeover
Effects of the Management Services Agreement
The limited circumstances in which our Manager may be terminated
means that it will be very difficult for a potential acquirer of
the company to take over the management and operation of our
business. Under the terms of the management services agreement,
our Manager may only be terminated by the company in the
following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
our shares underperform a weighted average of two benchmark
utilities indices by more than 30% in relative terms and more
than 2.5% in absolute terms in 16 out of 20 consecutive quarters
prior to and including the most recent full quarter, and the
holders of a minimum of
662/3%
of trust stock (excluding any shares of trust stock owned by our
Manager or any affiliate of our Manager) vote to remove our
Manager;
|
|
|
|
our Manager materially breaches the terms of the management
services agreement and such breach continues unremedied for
60 days after notice;
|
|
|
|
our Manager acts with gross negligence, willful misconduct, bad
faith or reckless disregard of its duties in carrying out its
obligations under the management services agreement or engages
in fraudulent or dishonest acts; or
|
|
|
|
our Manager experiences certain bankruptcy events.
|
30
In addition to the limited circumstances in which our Manager
can be terminated under the terms of the management services
agreement, the management services agreement provides that in
circumstances where the trust stock ceases to be listed on a
recognized U.S. exchange or on the Nasdaq National Market
as a result of the acquisition of trust stock by third parties
in an amount that results in the trust stock ceasing to meet the
distribution and trading criteria on such exchange or market,
the Manager has the option to either propose an alternate fee
structure and remain our Manager or resign, terminate the
management services agreement upon 30 days written
notice and be paid a substantial termination fee. The
termination fee payable on the Managers exercise of its
right to resign as our Manager subsequent to a delisting of our
shares could delay or prevent a change in control that may favor
our shareholders. Furthermore, in the event of such a delisting
and unless otherwise approved in writing by our Manager, any
proceeds from the sale, lease or exchange of a significant
amount of assets must be reinvested in new assets of our
company. We will also be prohibited from incurring any new
indebtedness or engaging in any transactions with the
shareholders of the trust, the company or their affiliates
without the prior written approval of the Manager. These
provisions could deprive the shareholders of the trust of
opportunities to realize a premium on the shares of trust stock
owned by them.
Furthermore, upon resignation of our Manager and the termination
of the management services agreement, or within 30 days of
a delisting of our shares unless otherwise agreed by our
Manager, the trust, the company and its subsidiaries will cease
using the Macquarie brand entirely, including changing their
names to remove any reference to Macquarie.
Similarly, if our Managers appointment is terminated by
the company, the trust, the company and its subsidiaries will
cease using the Macquarie brand within 30 days of
termination.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions in the Trust Agreement and the LLC
Agreement
A number of provisions of the LLC agreement and the trust
agreement also could have the effect of making it more difficult
for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party
from acquiring, control of the trust and the company. The trust
agreement and the LLC agreement prohibit the merger or
consolidation of the trust and the company with or into any
limited liability company, corporation, trust or any other
unincorporated business or the sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of the trusts and the companys
assets unless the board of directors adopts a resolution by a
majority vote approving such action and unless such action is
approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
outstanding shares of trust stock entitled to vote thereon;
provided, however, that any shares of trust stock held by the
Manager or an affiliate or associate of the Manager shall not be
entitled to vote to approve any merger or consolidation with or
into, or sale, lease or exchange to, the Manager or any
affiliate or an associate thereof. In addition, the LLC
agreement and the trust agreement contain provisions based on
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which
prohibit the company and the trust from engaging in a business
combination with an interested shareholder unless such business
combination is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of
662/3%
of the outstanding trust stock of the companys sole member
(other than those shares held by the interested shareholder or
any affiliate or associate thereof).
A business combination means:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation of the trust, the company or a
subsidiary of the company with an interested shareholder or any
person that is, or after such merger or consolidation would be,
an affiliate or associate of an interested shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other
disposition (in one transaction or a series of transactions) to
or with, or proposed by or on behalf of, an interested
shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder of any assets of the trust, the company or a
subsidiary of the company, having an aggregate fair market value
of not less than ten percent of the net investment value of the
company; or
|
|
|
|
the issuance or transfer by the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company (in one transaction or series of
transactions) of any securities of the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company to, or proposed by or on behalf of, an
interested shareholder or an affiliate or associate of an
interested shareholder in exchange for cash, securities or other
property (or a
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
combination thereof) having an aggregate fair market value of
not less than ten percent of the net investment value of the
company; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
any spinoff or
split-up of
any kind of the trust, the company or a subsidiary of the
company proposed by or on behalf of an interested shareholder or
an affiliate or associate of the interested shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
any reclassification of the trust stock or LLC interests
(including any reverse split of shares of trust stock or LLC
interests, or both) or recapitalization of the trust or the
company, or both, or any merger or consolidation of the trust or
company with any subsidiary of the company, or any other
transaction that has the effect of increasing the percentage of
the outstanding shares of the trust, the company or any
subsidiary of the company or any class of securities of the
company or any subsidiary of the company or the trust
convertible or exchangeable for shares of trust stock, LLC
interests or equity securities of any subsidiary, as the case
may be, that are directly or indirectly owned by an interested
shareholder or any affiliate or associate of an interested
shareholder; or
|
|
|
|
any agreement, contract or other arrangement providing for any
one or more of the actions in the above bullet points.
|
Please see Our Manager Management Services
Agreement Fees for a description of the
definition of net investment value.
An interested shareholder is a person (other than
our Manager, the trust, the company or any subsidiary of the
company or any employee benefit plan) who:
|
|
|
|
|
is, or was at any time within the three-year period immediately
prior to the date in question, the beneficial owner of 15% or
more of the shares of trust stock or LLC interests, as the case
may be, and who did not become the beneficial owner of such
amount of shares of trust stock or LLC interests, as the case
may be, pursuant to a transaction that was approved by the
companys board of directors; or
|
|
|
|
is an assignee of, or has otherwise succeeded to, any shares of
trust stock or LLC interests, as the case may be, of which an
interested shareholder was the beneficial owner at any time
within the three-year period immediately prior to the date in
question, if such assignment or succession occurred in the
course of a transaction, or series of transactions, not
involving a public offering.
|
Subject to the right of our Manager to appoint one director and
his or her successor in the event of a vacancy, the LLC
agreement authorizes only the board of directors of the company
to fill vacancies, including for newly created directorships.
This provision could prevent a shareholder of the trust from
effectively obtaining an indirect majority representation on the
board of directors of the company by permitting the existing
board to increase the number of directors and to fill the
vacancies with its own nominees. The LLC agreement and the trust
agreement also provide that, with the exception of the director
appointed to serve as Chairman by our Manager, directors may be
removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of
holders of
662/3%
of the outstanding trust stock.
The trust agreement and the LLC agreement do not permit holders
of the trust stock to act by written consent. Instead,
shareholders may only take action via proxy, which, when the
action relates to the trusts exercise of its rights as a
member of the company, may be presented at a duly called annual
or special meeting of members of the company and will constitute
the vote of the trust. For so long as the trust remains the
companys sole member, the trust shall act by written
consent, including to vote its LLC interests in a manner that
reflects the vote by proxy of the holders of the trust stock.
Furthermore, the trust agreement and the LLC agreement provide
that special meetings may only be called by the chairman of the
board of directors of the company or by resolution adopted by
the board of directors. The trust agreement and the LLC
agreement also provide that members, or holders of trust stock,
seeking to bring business before an annual meeting of members or
to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual
meeting of members of the company, must provide notice thereof
in writing to the company not less than 120 days and not
more than 150 days
32
prior to the anniversary date of the preceding years
annual meeting of the company. In addition, the member or holder
of trust stock furnishing such notice must be a member or
shareholder of record on both (1) the date of delivering
such notice and (2) the record date for the determination
of members or shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting. The
LLC agreement and the trust agreement specify certain
requirements as to the form and content of a members or
shareholders notice, as the case may be. These provisions
may preclude members or holders of trust stock from bringing
matters before an annual meeting or from making nominations for
directors at an annual or special meeting.
Authorized but unissued shares of trust stock are available for
future issuance, without approval of the shareholders of the
trust. These additional shares of trust stock may be utilized
for a variety of purposes, including future public offerings to
raise additional capital or to fund acquisitions. The existence
of authorized but unissued shares of trust stock could render
more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of the
trust by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or
otherwise.
In addition, the board of directors of the company has broad
authority to amend the LLC agreement and the trust agreement, as
discussed below. The board could, in the future, choose to amend
the LLC agreement to include other provisions which have the
intention or effect of discouraging takeover attempts.
Disclosure
Requirements Applicable to Ten Percent Investors
In the event that we are required to obtain approval from the
City of Chicago in the future for any matter, including to
expand our district cooling system in downtown Chicago or to
amend the use agreement we have entered into with the City of
Chicago, we will need to, and certain of our investors may need
to, submit an Economic Disclosure Statement, or EDS, to the City
of Chicago. The LLC agreement and the trust agreement require
any holder of ten percent of the shares of trust stock to
prepare and provide to us an executed EDS for submission to the
City within 30 days of our written request. As previously
disclosed, the City of Chicago may also require and EDS form
from an investor that holds between 7.5% and 10% of our
outstanding trust stock; however, such investors are not
obligated to provide an EDS to us. Completion of the then
current EDS is likely to involve making a number of
representations, acknowledgements and agreements, including the
following:
Representations
|
|
|
|
|
the investor has not had a business relationship
with any City of Chicago elected official in the 12 months
before the date of the EDS;
|
|
|
|
the investor is not delinquent in the payment of any tax
administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue, nor is it or
its affiliates delinquent in paying any fine, fee, tax or other
charge owed to the City of Chicago;
|
|
|
|
the investor and its affiliates have not, in the past five
years, been found in violation of any City of Chicago, state or
federal environmental law or regulation;
|
|
|
|
the investor, and its officers, directors, partners, members,
managers and executive directors, if any, have not, in the past
five years, been convicted or found liable in connection with a
public transaction or contract or antitrust violations, fraud,
falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, had one or more public transactions terminated for
cause or default or engaged in acts of bribery, bid-rigging or
bid collusion; and
|
|
|
|
the investor has searched any and all of its records and the
records of any and all predecessor entities for records of
investments or profits from slavery, the slave industry or
slaveholder insurance policies, and has either found no such
records and no records of names of any slaves or slaveholders or
has provided full disclosure to the City of Chicago as required
in the EDS.
|
33
Acknowledgements
and Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
the investor will comply fully with the Citys Governmental
Ethics and Campaign Financing Ordinances;
|
|
|
|
the investor understands and will comply with the applicable
requirements of the City of Chicagos Governmental Ethics
Ordinance and the provisions of the Municipal Code relating to
cooperation with investigations by the Inspector General; and
|
|
|
|
the investor will comply with all statutes, ordinances and
regulations on which the EDS is based.
|
Each investor that submits an EDS must also supplement the EDS
for any changes up to the time the City of Chicago takes action
on the matter.
If the City of Chicago determines that any information provided
in an EDS is false, incomplete or inaccurate, it could rescind
or void our use agreement or any other arrangement that we have
with the City of Chicago at that time, as well as pursue any
remedies under the use agreement or such other arrangements.
Furthermore, the City of Chicago could decline to allow us or
any investor that submits an EDS to participate in other
transactions with the City of Chicago.
Any EDS filed by an investor may become publicly available. By
completing and signing an EDS, an investor will have waived and
released any possible rights or claims which it may have against
the City of Chicago in connection with the public release of
information contained in the EDS and also will have authorized
the City of Chicago to verify the accuracy of any information
submitted in the EDS. The filing of an EDS will entitle the City
of Chicago to investigate the creditworthiness of the investor
named in the EDS. For further details on the currently required
disclosures, we refer you to the current form of EDS, which can
be found at the City of Chicagos website at
egov.cityofchicago.org.
Amendment
of the LLC Agreement
The LLC agreement may be amended by a majority vote of the board
of directors of the company, except with respect to the
following provisions, which effectively require an affirmative
vote of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of trust
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
the purpose or powers of the company;
|
|
|
|
the authorization of additional LLC interests;
|
|
|
|
the provisions regarding the right to acquire LLC interests
after an acquisition exchange described above;
|
|
|
|
the right of a holder of trust stock to enforce the LLC
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the hiring of a replacement manager following the termination of
the management services agreement;
|
|
|
|
the merger or consolidation of the company, the sale, lease or
exchange of all or substantially all of the companys
assets and certain other business combinations or transactions;
|
|
|
|
the right of holders to vote on the dissolution of the company;
and
|
|
|
|
the provision of the LLC agreement governing amendments thereof.
|
In addition, the consent of our Manager is required to amend the
provisions providing for the duties of our Manager and the
secondment of our officers pursuant to the management services
agreement, the provision entitling our Manager to appoint the
director who will serve as the chairman of the board of
directors of the company for so long as the management services
agreement is in effect and the provision of the LLC agreement
governing amendments thereof.
34
Amendment
of the Trust Agreement
The trust agreement may be amended by the company, as sponsor of
the trust. However, the company may not:
|
|
|
|
|
enter into or consent to any amendment which would cause the
trust to fail or cease to qualify for the exemption from the
status of an investment company under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 or be classified as anything other than a
grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
cause the trust to issue a class of equity securities other than
the shares or issue any debt securities or any derivative
securities or amend the provision of the trust agreement
prohibiting any such issuances;
|
|
|
|
enter into or consent to any amendment of the trust agreement
that would affect the exclusive and absolute right of the
shareholders of trust stock to direct the voting of the trust,
as a member of the company, with respect to all matters reserved
for the vote of members pursuant to the LLC agreement;
|
|
|
|
engage in the merger or consolidation of the trust, the sale,
lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the
trusts assets and certain other business combinations or
transactions;
|
|
|
|
change the number of authorized shares without the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares of trust stock; or
|
|
|
|
amend the provision of the trust agreement governing the
amendment thereof without the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares of trust stock.
|
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for the shares of trust stock
and the LLC interests is The Bank of New York.
Listing
The shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol
MIC.
35
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion describes the material
U.S. federal (and certain state and local) income tax
considerations associated with the purchase, ownership and
disposition of shares as of the date hereof by U.S. holders
(as defined below) and
non-U.S. holders
(as defined below). Except where noted, this discussion deals
only with shares held as capital assets by holders who acquired
shares upon their original issuance and does not address special
situations, such as those of:
|
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
persons holding shares as a part of a hedging, integrated or
conversion transaction or a straddle;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities holdings; or
|
|
|
|
persons liable for alternative minimum tax.
|
Furthermore, the discussion below is based upon the provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code,
the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, or the
Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations
thereof, all as of the date hereof, and such authorities may be
repealed, revoked, modified or subject to differing
interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis, so as to
result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different
from those described below.
A U.S. holder of shares means a beneficial
owner of shares that is for U.S. federal income tax
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation) created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any
state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in
effect under applicable Regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
A
non-U.S. holder
of shares means a beneficial owner of shares that is an
individual, a corporation, an estate or a trust that is not a
U.S. holder.
If a partnership or other entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds
shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding
shares, we urge you to consult your own tax adviser.
No statutory, administrative or judicial authority directly
addresses the treatment of shares or instruments similar to
shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result,
we cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service, or the
IRS, or the courts will agree with the tax consequences
described herein. A different treatment from that described
below could adversely affect the amount, timing and character of
income, gain or loss in respect of an investment in the shares.
If you are considering the purchase of shares, we urge you to
consult your own tax adviser concerning the particular
U.S. federal income tax
36
consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of shares, as well as any consequences to you
arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
Status of
the Trust
Under current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of
the trust agreement (and other relevant documents), although the
matter is not free from doubt, in the opinion of
Shearman & Sterling LLP, the trust will be classified a
grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not
as an association taxable as a corporation. As a result, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, you generally will be
treated as the beneficial owner of a pro rata portion of the
interests in the company held by the trust. You should be aware
that an opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS or the
courts. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the IRS will
not contend, or that a court will not ultimately hold, that the
trust does not constitute a grantor trust for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. If the trust is found not to constitute a
grantor trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the
board of directors determines that the existence of the trust
results or is reasonably likely to result in a material tax
detriment to holders, among other things, then the board of
directors may agree to dissolve the trust and transfer LLC
interests to holders in exchange for shares of trust stock.
Status of
the Company
A partnership is not a taxable entity and incurs no
U.S. federal income tax liability. Section 7704 of the
Code provides that publicly traded partnerships will, as a
general rule, be taxed as corporations. However, an exception,
which we refer to as the qualifying income exception, exists
with respect to publicly traded partnerships of which 90% or
more of the gross income during each taxable year consists of
qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code. Qualifying income includes
dividends, interest and capital gains from the sale or other
disposition of stocks and bonds. We estimate that at least 90%
of our gross income for each taxable year will constitute income
that Shearman & Sterling LLP has opined or will opine
is qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704(d)
of the Code.
Under current law and assuming full compliance with the terms of
the LLC agreement (and other relevant documents) and based upon
factual representations made by us, in the opinion of
Shearman & Sterling LLP, the company will be classified
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The
factual representations made by us upon which
Shearman & Sterling LLP has relied are: (a) the
company has not elected and will not elect to be treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
(b) for each taxable year, more than 90% of the
companys gross income will be income that
Shearman & Sterling LLP has opined or will opine is
qualifying income within the meaning of Section 7704(d) of
the Code.
There can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the
company should be treated as a publicly traded partnership
taxable as a corporation. No ruling has been or will be sought
from the IRS, and the IRS has made no determination, as to the
status of the company for U.S. federal income tax purposes
or whether the companys operations generate
qualifying income under Section 7704(d) of the
Code. Whether the company will continue to meet the qualifying
income exception is a matter that will be determined by the
companys operations and the facts existing at the time of
future determinations. However, the companys board of
directors will use its best efforts to cause the company to
operate in such manner as is necessary for the company to
continue to meet the qualifying income exception.
If the company fails to satisfy the qualifying income exception
described above (other than a failure which is determined by the
IRS to be inadvertent and which is cured within a reasonable
period of time after the discovery of such failure) or if the
company elects to be treated as a corporation based upon a
determination of the board of directors in the circumstances
described in Description of
Shares Authorized Trust Stock
Election by the Company above, the company will be treated
as if it had transferred all of its assets, subject to its
liabilities, to a newly formed corporation, on the first day of
the year in which it failed to satisfy the exception, in return
for stock in that corporation, and then distributed that stock
to the holders in liquidation of their interests in the company.
This contribution and liquidation should be tax-free to holders
(except for a
non-U.S. holder
with respect to its indirect interest in MIC Inc., but only if
MIC Inc. were considered a U.S. real property holding
corporation at such time but the newly formed corporation were
not
37
considered a U.S. real property holding corporation) and
the company so long as the company, at that time, does not have
liabilities in excess of its tax basis in its assets.
Thereafter, the company would be treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the company were
taxable as a corporation in any taxable year, either as a result
of a failure to meet the qualifying income exception described
above or otherwise, its items of income, gain, loss and
deduction would be reflected only on its tax return rather than
being passed through to the holders of shares, and its net
income would be taxed to it at the tax rates applicable to
domestic corporations. In addition, any distribution made to the
trust would be treated as taxable dividend income, to the extent
of the companys current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of current and accumulated earnings
and profits, a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of
each holders tax basis in its LLC interests, or taxable
capital gain, after the holders tax basis in its LLC
interests is reduced to zero. Taxation of the company as a
corporation could result in a material reduction in a
holders cash flow and after-tax return and thus could
result in a substantial reduction of the value of the shares.
The discussion below is based on Shearman & Sterling
LLPs opinion that the company will be classified as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
U.S. Holders
Treatment
of Company Income
A partnership does not incur U.S. federal income tax
liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is required to
take into account its share of items of income, gain, loss,
deduction and other items of the partnership. Accordingly, each
holder will be required to include in income its allocable share
of our income, gain, loss, deduction and other items for our
taxable year ending with or within its taxable year. In
computing a partners U.S. federal income tax
liability, such items must be included, regardless of whether
cash distributions are made by the partnership. Thus, holders
may be required to include income without a corresponding
current receipt of cash if the company generates taxable income
but does not make cash distributions. The character of an item
of income, gain, loss, deduction or other items will generally
be determined at the partnership level (rather than at the
partner level). Our taxable year will end on December 31
unless otherwise required by law.
Under the Code, qualified dividend income received
by (or allocable to) non-corporate taxpayers, including
individuals, from qualified foreign corporations and most
domestic corporations generally is subject to tax at the lower
rate applicable to long-term capital gain. In general, a
qualified foreign corporation is a foreign
corporation that (1) is incorporated in a possession of the
United States or (2) is eligible for the benefits of a tax
treaty that is a comprehensive income tax treaty to
which the United States is a party. A foreign corporation will
also be treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect
to any dividend paid by such corporation if the stock with
respect to which such dividend is paid is readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States. However,
dividends from a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC,
will not be treated as qualified dividend income. In addition,
for a shareholder to receive qualifying dividend income with
respect to dividends paid on the shares, the shareholder
generally must hold the stock on which the dividend is paid more
than 60 days during the
121-day
period beginning 60 days before the
ex-dividend
date. In the case of dividend income recognized by the company,
the holding period requirement must be met both by the company
with respect to the stock and by the holder with respect to its
shares of trust stock (in each case, as determined with respect
to the ex-dividend date for the stock on which the dividend is
paid).
Dividends received by the company from U.S. corporations
(including MIC Inc.) generally will constitute qualified
dividend income. Any dividends received by the company that do
not constitute qualified dividend income will be taxed to
U.S. holders at the tax rates generally applicable to
ordinary income.
Dividends received by the company from foreign corporations in
which it may own stock from time to time may constitute
qualified dividend income if such foreign
corporations satisfy the definition of a qualified foreign
corporation. We cannot assure you that dividends from
foreign corporations whose stock we subsequently acquire will
constitute qualified dividend income.
38
Unless Congress enacts legislation providing otherwise, the
reduced rates for qualified dividend income will not apply for
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010, and the
law as in effect prior to the enactment of the qualified
dividend income provisions will apply.
Allocation
of the Companys Profits and Losses
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holders
distributive share of the companys income, gain, loss,
deduction and other items will be determined by the LLC
agreement, unless an allocation under the agreement does not
have substantial economic effect, in which case the
allocations will be determined in accordance with the
partners interests in the partnership. The
company believes that the allocations pursuant to the LLC
agreement should be considered to have substantial economic
effect.
If the allocations provided by the LLC agreement were
successfully challenged by the IRS, the amount of income or loss
allocated to holders for U.S. federal income tax purposes
under the agreement could be increased or reduced or the
character of the income or loss could be modified.
Treatment
of Distributions
Distributions of cash by a partnership (including distributions
made in redemption of less than all of a partnership interest)
are generally not taxable to the distributee to the extent the
amount of cash does not exceed the distributees tax basis
in its partnership interest. Thus, any cash distributions made
by the company will be taxable to a holder only to the extent
such distributions exceed the holders tax basis in the LLC
interests it is treated as owning (see Tax
Basis in LLC Interests below). Any cash distributions in
excess of a holders tax basis generally will be considered
to be gain from the sale or exchange of the shares (see
Disposition of Shares below).
Disposition
of Shares
If a U.S. holder transfers shares, it will be treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as transferring its pro
rata share of the LLC interests held by the trust. If such
transfer is a sale or other taxable disposition, the
U.S. holder will generally be required to recognize gain or
loss measured by the difference between the amount realized on
the sale and the U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in
the LLC interests deemed sold. The amount realized will include
the U.S. holders share of the companys
liabilities, as well as any proceeds from the sale. The gain or
loss recognized will generally be taxable as capital gain or
loss, except that the gain will be ordinary income to the extent
attributable to the U.S. holders allocable share of
unrealized gain or loss in assets of the company to the extent
described in Section 751 of the Code (including unremitted
earnings of any controlled foreign corporations held, directly
or indirectly, by the company). Capital gain of non-corporate
U.S. holders is eligible to be taxed at reduced rates where
the LLC interests deemed sold are considered held for more than
one year. Capital gain of corporate U.S. holders is taxed
at the same rate as ordinary income. Any capital loss recognized
by a U.S. holder on a sale of shares will generally be
deductible only against capital gains, except that a
non-corporate U.S. holder may also offset up to
$3,000 per year of ordinary income. U.S. holders who
purchase shares at different times and sell all or part of the
shares within a year of their most recent purchase are urged to
consult their tax advisers regarding the application of certain
split holding period rules to them and the treatment
of any gain or loss as long-term or short-term capital gain or
loss.
In general, a U.S. holder who is deemed to dispose of an
interest in a PFIC may be subject to certain adverse tax
consequences unless one of certain specific tax elections (if
available) is made. These consequences are generally that
(1) any gain derived from the deemed disposition of such
stock, as well as any excess distribution that is
treated as received from the PFIC (i.e., a distribution that
exceeds 125% of the average distributions from the shorter of
the prior three years and the holders holding period),
would be treated as ordinary income that was earned ratably over
each day in the holders holding period for the stock,
(2) the portion of such gain or distribution that is
allocable to prior taxable years generally would be subject to
U.S. federal income tax at the highest rate applicable to
ordinary income for the relevant taxable years,
39
regardless of the tax rate otherwise applicable to the
U.S. holder and (3) an interest charge would be
imposed on the resulting tax liability as if such liability
represented a tax deficiency for the past taxable years.
A U.S. holder would be deemed to dispose of an interest in
a PFIC if the company disposes of stock in a PFIC, the company
receives an excess distribution from a PFIC or such
U.S. holder disposes of shares at a time when the company
holds stock in a PFIC. We urge you to consult your own tax
advisers with respect to the application of the PFIC rules to
your particular circumstances.
Tax
Basis in LLC Interests
A U.S. holders initial tax basis in the LLC interests
it is treated as holding will equal the sum of (a) the
amount of cash paid by such U.S. holder for its shares and
(b) such U.S. holders share of the
companys liabilities. A U.S. holders tax basis
in the LLC interests it is treated as holding will be increased
by (a) the U.S. holders share of the
companys taxable income, including capital gain,
(b) the U.S. holders share of the companys
income, if any, that is exempt from tax and (c) any
increase in the U.S. holders share of the
companys liabilities. A U.S. holders tax basis
in the LLC interests it is treated as holding will be decreased
(but not below zero) by (a) the amount of any cash
distributed (or deemed distributed) to the U.S. holder,
(b) the U.S. holders share of the companys
losses and deductions, (c) the U.S. holders
share of the companys expenditures that are neither
deductible nor properly chargeable to its capital account and
(d) any decrease in the U.S. holders share of
the companys liabilities.
Treatment
of Securities Loans
A U.S. holder whose shares are loaned to a short
seller to cover a short sale of shares may be considered
as having disposed of those shares. If so, such U.S. holder
would no longer be a beneficial owner of a pro rata portion of
the LLC interests with respect to those shares during the period
of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the disposition.
As a result, during the period of the loan, (1) any of our
income, gain, loss, deduction or other items with respect to
those shares would not be reported by the U.S. holder, and
(2) any cash distributions received by the U.S. holder
as to those shares would be fully taxable, likely as ordinary
income. Accordingly, U.S. holders who desire to avoid the
risk of gain recognition from a loan to a short seller are urged
to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements to
prohibit their brokers from borrowing their shares.
Limitations
on Interest Deductions
The deductibility of a non-corporate U.S. holders
investment interest expense is generally limited to
the amount of that holders net investment
income. Investment interest expense would generally
include interest expense incurred by the company, if any, and
investment interest expense incurred by the U.S. holder on
any margin account borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase
or carry shares. Net investment income includes gross income
from property held for investment and amounts treated as
portfolio income, such as dividends and interest, under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income. For this purpose, any long-term capital gain or
qualifying dividend income that is taxable at long-term capital
gains rates is excluded from net investment income unless the
U.S. holder elects to pay tax on such gain or dividend
income at ordinary income rates.
Syndication
and Other Expenses
In general, expenses incurred by us that are considered
miscellaneous itemized deductions may be deducted by
a U.S. holder that is an individual, estate or trust only
to the extent that they exceed 2% of the adjusted gross income
of such U.S. holder. The Code imposes additional
limitations (which are scheduled to be phased out between 2006
and 2010) on the amount of certain itemized deductions
allowable to individuals, by reducing the otherwise allowable
portion of such deductions by an amount equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
3% of the individuals adjusted gross income in excess of
certain threshold amounts; or
|
|
|
|
80% of the amount of certain itemized deductions otherwise
allowable for the taxable year.
|
40
In addition, these expenses are also not deductible in
determining the alternative minimum tax liability of a
U.S. holder. The company will report such expenses on a pro
rata basis to the holders, and each U.S. holder will
determine separately to what extent they are deductible on such
U.S. holders tax return. A U.S. holders
inability to deduct all or a portion of such expenses could
result in an amount of taxable income to such U.S. holder
with respect to the company that exceeds the amount of cash
actually distributed to such U.S. holder for the year. We
anticipate that management fees the company will pay will
constitute miscellaneous itemized deductions. If the IRS were to
successfully assert that any portion of the management fees paid
by the company to our Manager should have been paid by MIC Inc.,
such management fees would not be deductible by the company but
would be deductible by MIC Inc. In contrast, if the IRS were to
successfully assert that any portion of the management fees paid
by MIC Inc. to our Manager should have been paid by the company,
the company likely would recognize a deemed dividend from MIC
Inc. and the company would recognize additional deductions for
management fees, which would be subject to the limitations
described above.
Expenditures in connection with the issuance and marketing of
shares (so-called syndication fees) are not eligible
for amortization and are not deductible.
Section 754
Election
The company will make the election permitted by Section 754
of the Code. Such an election is irrevocable without the consent
of the IRS. The election will generally require a purchaser of
shares to adjust its proportionate share of the basis in the
companys assets, or the inside basis, pursuant to
Section 743(b) of the Code to fair market value (as
reflected in the purchase price for the purchasers
shares), as if it had acquired a direct interest in the
companys assets. The Section 743(b) adjustment is
attributed solely to a purchaser of shares and is not added to
the bases of the companys assets associated with all of
the other holders. The Section 754 election, however, could
result in adjustments to the inside basis of the company assets,
under Section 734, in connection with certain distributions.
The calculations under Section 754 of the Code are complex,
and there is little legal authority concerning the mechanics of
the calculations, particularly in the context of publicly traded
partnerships and partnerships held by grantor trusts. To help
reduce the complexity of those calculations and the resulting
administrative costs to the company, the company will apply
certain conventions in determining and allocating the
Section 743 basis adjustments. It is possible that the IRS
will successfully assert that the conventions utilized by the
company do not satisfy the technical requirements of the Code or
the Regulations and, thus, will require different basis
adjustments to be made.
Limitations
on Deductibility of Losses
The deduction by a U.S. holder of its share of the
companys losses, if any, will be limited to the lesser of
(i) the tax basis in such holders shares (and, in
turn, in the non-management interests the holder is deemed to
own), or (ii) in the case of a holder that is an individual
or a closely-held corporation (a corporation where more than 50%
of the value of its stock is owned directly or indirectly by
five or fewer individuals or certain tax-exempt organizations),
the amount which the holder is considered to be at
risk with respect to certain activities of the company. In
general, the amount at risk includes the
holders actual amount paid for the shares and any share of
company debt that constitutes qualified nonrecourse
financing. The amount at risk excludes any
amount the holder borrows to acquire or hold its shares if the
lender of such borrowed funds owns shares or can look only to
shares for repayment. Losses in excess of the amount at risk
must be deferred until years in which the company generates
taxable income against which to offset such carryover losses.
Passive
Activity Income and Loss
Individuals are subject to certain passive activity
loss rules under Section 469 of the Code. Under these
rules, losses from a passive activity generally may not be used
to offset income derived from any source other than passive
activities. Losses that cannot be currently used under this rule
may generally be carried
41
forward. Upon an individuals disposition of an interest in
the passive activity, the individuals unused passive
losses may generally be used to offset other (i.e., non-passive)
income. Under temporary Regulations, income or loss from the
companys investments generally will not constitute income
or loss from a passive activity. Therefore, income or gains from
the companys investments will not be available to offset a
U.S. holders passive losses from other sources.
Transferor/Transferee
Allocations
In general, the companys taxable income and losses will be
determined monthly and will be apportioned among the holders in
proportion to the number of LLC interests treated as owned by
each of them as of the close of the last trading day of the
preceding month. With respect to any LLC interest that was not
treated as outstanding as of the close of the last trading day
of the preceding month, the first person that is treated as
holding such LLC interest (other than an underwriter or other
person holding in a similar capacity) for U.S. federal
income tax purposes will be treated as holding such LLC interest
for this purpose as of the close of the last trading day of the
preceding month. As a result, a holder transferring its shares
may be allocated income, gain, loss and deduction realized after
the date of transfer.
Section 706 of the Code generally requires that items of
partnership income and deductions be allocated between
transferors and transferees of partnership interests on a daily
basis. It is possible that transfers of shares could be
considered to occur for U.S. federal income tax purposes
when the transfer is completed without regard to the
companys convention for allocating income and deductions.
In that event, the companys allocation method might be
considered a monthly convention that does not literally comply
with that requirement.
If the IRS treats transfers of shares as occurring throughout
each month and a monthly convention is not allowed by the
Regulations (or only applies to transfers of less than all of a
holders shares) or if the IRS otherwise does not accept
the companys convention, the IRS may contend that taxable
income or losses of the company must be reallocated among the
holders. If such a contention were sustained, the holders
respective tax liabilities would be adjusted to the possible
detriment of certain holders. The companys board of
directors is authorized to revise the companys method of
allocation between transferors and transferees (as well as among
holders whose interests otherwise vary during a taxable period).
Constructive
Termination
The company will be considered to have terminated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or
exchange of 50% or more of the total shares within a
12-month
period. A constructive termination results in the closing of the
companys taxable year for all holders. In the case of a
holder reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year
ending December 31, the closing of the companys
taxable year may result in more than 12 months of its
taxable income or loss being includable in such holders
taxable income for the year of termination. The company would be
required to make new tax elections after a termination,
including a new election under Section 754. A termination
could also result in penalties if the company were unable to
determine that the termination has occurred.
Tax
Reporting by the Trust and the Company
Information returns will be filed with the IRS, as required,
with respect to income, gain, loss, deduction and other items
derived from the shares. The company will file a partnership
return with the IRS and intends to issue a
Schedule K-1
to the trustee on behalf of the holders. The trustee intends to
report to you all necessary items on a tax information statement
or some other form as required by law. If you hold your shares
through a nominee (such as a broker), we anticipate that the
nominee will provide you with an IRS Form 1099 or
substantially similar form, which will be supplemented by
additional tax information that we will make available directly
to you. Furthermore, holders should be aware that recently
promulgated Regulations that are applicable as of
January 1, 2007 could alter the manner in which tax
reporting by the company, the trust and any nominee will be
undertaken. We note that, given the lack of authority addressing
structures similar to that of the trust and the company, it is
not certain that the IRS will agree that the manner
42
in which the trust and the company will report tax information
complies with existing law and the Regulations applicable
beginning January 1, 2007. If the company or the trust is
found not to have reported in a manner consistent with
applicable law, the company or the trust could be subject to
significant tax penalties, including assessments for periods in
prior taxable years.
Audits
and Adjustments to Tax Liability
Any challenge by the IRS to the tax treatment by a partnership
of any item must be conducted at the partnership, rather than at
the partner, level. A partnership ordinarily designates a
tax matters partner (as defined under
Section 6231 of the Code) as the person to receive notices
and to act on its behalf in the conduct of such a challenge or
audit by the IRS.
Pursuant to the LLC agreement, our Manager will be appointed the
tax matters partner of the company for all purposes
pursuant to
Sections 6221-6231
of the Code. The tax matters partner, which is required by the
LLC agreement to notify all U.S. holders of any
U.S. federal income tax audit of the company, will have the
authority under the LLC agreement to conduct any IRS audits of
the companys tax returns or other tax-related
administrative or judicial proceedings and to settle or further
contest any issues in such proceedings. The decision in any
proceeding initiated by the tax matters partner will be binding
on all U.S. holders. As the tax matters partner, our
Manager will have the right on behalf of all holders to extend
the statute of limitations relating to the holders
U.S. federal income tax liabilities with respect to company
items.
A U.S. federal income tax audit of the companys
information return may result in an audit of the returns of the
U.S. holders, which, in turn, could result in adjustments
of items of a holder that are unrelated to the company as well
as to company-related items. In particular, there can be no
assurance that the IRS, upon an audit of an information return
of the company or of an income tax return of a U.S. holder,
might not take a position that differs from the treatment
thereof by the company. A U.S. holder would be liable for
interest on any deficiencies that resulted from any adjustments.
Potential U.S. holders should also recognize that they
might be forced to incur substantial legal and accounting costs
in resisting any challenge by the IRS to items in their
individual returns, even if the challenge by the IRS should
prove unsuccessful.
Foreign
Tax Credits
Subject to generally applicable limitations, U.S. holders
will be able to claim foreign tax credits with respect to
certain foreign income taxes paid or incurred by us, withheld on
payments made to us or paid by us on behalf of holders. If a
holder elects to claim a foreign tax credit, it must include in
its gross income, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
both its share of the companys items of income and gain
and also its share of the amount which we deem to be the
holders portion of foreign income taxes paid with respect
to, or withheld from, dividends, interest or other income
derived by the company. U.S. holders may then subtract from
their U.S. federal income tax liability the amount of such
taxes withheld, or else treat such foreign taxes as deductions
from gross income; however, as in the case of investors
receiving income directly from foreign sources, the
above-described tax credit or deduction is subject to certain
limitations. The Code imposes a required holding period on stock
for U.S. holders to be eligible to claim such credits. Even
if the holder is unable to claim a credit, he or she must
include all amounts described above in income. We urge
U.S. holders to consult their tax advisers regarding this
election and its consequences to them.
Taxation
of Certain Foreign Earnings
Under Subpart F of the Code, certain undistributed earnings and
certain passive income of a foreign company constituting a
controlled foreign corporation, or CFC, as defined in
Section 957 of the Code, are taxed to certain
U.S. holders prior to being distributed. We believe, but
cannot offer any assurances, that none of the foreign companies
that the company has invested in are CFCs. In addition, no
assurances can be given that other foreign companies in which
the company may invest in the future will not be CFCs. Even if a
foreign corporation in which we invest constitutes a CFC, we
will recognize income in respect of such CFC prior to the
receipt of cash distributions only if such CFC recognizes more
than a de minimis amount of certain types of income.
Distributions made by a foreign company regarded as a CFC could
generally
43
constitute qualified dividend income; however, the
operation of the Subpart F provisions would result in such
earnings, when distributed or deemed distributed, not being
regarded as qualified dividend income. Further, as
discussed above in Disposition of Shares,
U.S. holders of PFICs may be subject to certain adverse
U.S. federal income tax consequences, including a deferred
interest charge upon the distribution of previously accumulated
earnings.
Taxation
of Foreign Currency Transactions
To the extent that the company receives dividends or interest
income denominated in a
non-U.S.
currency, the company may realize gain or loss attributable to
fluctuations in the value of such
non-U.S. currencies
relative to the value of the dollar. In general, gains or losses
of the company on the acquisition and disposition of
non-U.S. currency
will be treated as ordinary income or loss. In addition, gains
or losses attributable to fluctuations in exchange rates that
occur between the time that the company accrues interest or
expenses denominated in a
non-U.S. currency
and the time that the company collects the interest or pays the
expenses may be treated as ordinary income or loss. Further, any
gain or loss recognized by the company with respect to
derivative instruments used to hedge its foreign currency risk
may be treated as ordinary income or loss.
Tax
Shelter Disclosure Rules
There are circumstances under which certain transactions must be
disclosed to the IRS in a disclosure statement attached to a
taxpayers U.S. federal income tax return (a copy of
such statement must also be sent to the IRS Office of Tax
Shelter Analysis). In addition, the Code imposes a requirement
on certain material advisers to maintain a list of
persons participating in such transactions, which list must be
furnished to the IRS upon written request. These provisions can
apply to transactions not conventionally considered to involve
abusive tax planning. Consequently, it is possible that such
disclosure could be required by the company or the holders if a
holder incurs a loss (in each case, in excess of a threshold
computed without regard to offsetting gains or other income or
limitations) from the disposition (including by way of
withdrawal) of shares or possibly in other circumstances.
Furthermore, the companys material advisers could be
required to maintain a list of persons investing in the company
pursuant to the Code. While the tax shelter disclosure rules
generally do not apply to a loss recognized on the disposition
of an asset in which the taxpayer has a qualifying basis
(generally a basis equal to the amount of cash paid by the
taxpayer for such asset), such rules will apply to a taxpayer
recognizing a loss with respect to interests in a pass-through
entity (such as the shares) even if its basis in such interests
is equal to the amount of cash it paid. We urge
U.S. holders to consult their tax advisers regarding the
tax shelter disclosure rules and their possible application to
them.
Non-U.S. Holders
A
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such
holders distributive share of the companys income,
provided that such income is not considered to be income of the
holder that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade
or business within the United States. In the case of an
individual
non-U.S. holder,
such holder will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on
gains on the sale of shares in the company or such holders
distributive share of gains if such holder is present in the
United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year
and certain other conditions are met.
The company should not be treated as engaged in a trade or
business within the United States and therefore should not
realize income that would be treated as effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business within the United
States. If the income from the company is effectively
connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by
a
non-U.S. holder
(and, if certain income tax treaties apply, is attributable to a
U.S. permanent establishment), then such holders
share of any income and any gains realized upon the sale or
exchange of shares will be subject to U.S. federal income
tax at the graduated rates applicable to U.S. citizens and
residents and domestic corporations.
Non-U.S. holders
that are corporations may also be subject to a 30% branch
profits tax (or lower treaty rate, if applicable) on their
effectively connected earnings and profits that are not timely
reinvested in a U.S. trade or business.
44
In addition, gains, if any, allocable to a
non-U.S. holder
and attributable to a sale by the company of a
U.S. real property interest, or USRPI (other
than such gains subject to tax under the rules discussed above),
are generally subject to U.S. federal income tax as if such
gains were effectively connected with the conduct by the
non-U.S. holder
of a U.S. trade or business. Moreover, a withholding tax is
imposed with respect to such gain as a means of collecting such
tax. For this purpose, a USRPI includes an interest (other than
solely as a creditor) in a U.S. real property holding
corporation (in general, a U.S. corporation, at least
50% of whose real estate and trade or business assets, measured
by fair market value, consists of USRPIs), as well as an
interest in a partnership that holds USRPIs. This withholding
tax would be creditable against a
non-U.S. holders
actual U.S. federal income tax liability and any excess
withholding tax may generally be eligible for refund. Although a
non-U.S. holder
who is a partner in a partnership that owns USRPIs is generally
subject to tax on its sale or other disposition of its
partnership interest to the extent attributable to such USRPIs,
no withholding tax is generally imposed on the transfer of
publicly traded partnership interests, and gain will not be
taxable under the USRPI provisions where the
non-U.S. holder
owns no more than 5% of a publicly traded entity such as the
company. A
non-U.S. holder
that owns more than 5% of the company should consult its tax
adviser about the potential application of the USRPI provisions.
In light of our recent acquisitions, we currently believe that
we are a U.S. real property holding corporation.
A
non-U.S. holder
generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
at the rate of 30% (or, under certain circumstances, at a
reduced rate provided by an income tax treaty, if applicable) in
respect of such holders distributive share of dividends
from U.S. corporations (including MIC Inc.) and certain
other types of
U.S.-source
income realized by the company.
Non-U.S. holders
will be subject to U.S. federal estate tax on the value of
U.S.-situs
property owned at the time of their death. It is unclear whether
partnership interests (such as the LLC interests) will be
considered
U.S.-situs
property. Accordingly,
non-U.S. holders
may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax on all or part of
the value of the LLC interests owned at the time of their death.
Non-U.S. holders
are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to
the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in the
company.
Regulated
Investment Companies and Tax-Exempt Organizations
The company anticipates that more than 90% of a holders
distributive share of our income during each year will be
qualifying income for purposes of the holders
determination of whether such holder satisfies the income
requirements necessary to qualify as a regulated investment
company for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
An organization that is otherwise exempt from U.S. federal
income tax is nonetheless subject to taxation with respect to
its unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI, to
the extent that its UBTI from all sources exceeds $1,000 in any
taxable year. Except as noted below with respect to certain
categories of exempt income, UBTI generally includes income or
gain derived (either directly or through partnerships) from a
trade or business, the conduct of which is substantially
unrelated to the exercise or performance of the
organizations exempt purpose or function.
UBTI generally does not include passive investment income, such
as dividends, interest and capital gains, whether realized by
the organization directly or indirectly through a partnership
(such as the company) in which it is a partner. This type of
income is exempt, subject to the discussion of unrelated
debt-financed income below, even if it is realized from
securities trading activity that constitutes a trade or business.
UBTI includes not only trade or business income or gain as
described above, but also unrelated debt-financed
income. This latter type of income generally consists of
(1) income derived by an exempt organization (directly or
through a partnership) from income-producing property with
respect to which there is acquisition indebtedness
at any time during the taxable year and (2) gains derived
by an exempt organization (directly or through a partnership)
from the disposition of property with respect to which there is
acquisition indebtedness at any time during the twelve-month
period ending with the date of the disposition.
45
The company has incurred acquisition indebtedness
with respect to certain of its assets. To the extent the company
recognizes income in the form of dividends and interest from
securities with respect to which there is acquisition
indebtedness during a taxable year, the percentage of the
income that will be treated as UBTI generally will be equal to
the amount of the income times a fraction, the numerator of
which is the average acquisition indebtedness
incurred with respect to the securities, and the denominator of
which is the average amount of the adjusted basis of
the securities during the period such securities are held by the
company during the taxable year.
To the extent the company recognizes gain from securities with
respect to which there is acquisition indebtedness,
the portion of the gain that will be treated as UBTI will be
equal to the amount of the gain times a fraction, the numerator
of which is the highest amount of the acquisition
indebtedness with respect to the securities during the
twelve-month period ending with the date of their disposition,
and the denominator of which is the average amount of the
adjusted basis of the securities during the period such
securities are held by the company during the taxable year. In
determining the unrelated debt-financed income of the company,
an allocable portion of deductions directly connected with the
companys debt-financed property will be taken into
account. In making such a determination, for instance, a portion
of losses from debt-financed securities (determined in the
manner described above for evaluating the portion of any gain
that would be treated as UBTI) would offset gains treated as
UBTI. A charitable remainder trust will not be exempt from
U.S. federal income tax under the Code for any year in
which it has UBTI; in view of the potential for UBTI, the
company is not a suitable investment for a charitable remainder
trust.
Certain
State and Local Taxation Matters
Prospective holders should consider, in addition to the
U.S. federal income tax consequences described, potential
state and local tax considerations in investing in the shares.
State and local laws often differ from U.S. federal income
tax laws with respect to the treatment of specific items of
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit. A holders
distributive share of the taxable income or loss of the company
generally will be required to be included in determining its
reportable income for state and local tax purposes in the
jurisdiction in which the holder is a resident. The company may
conduct business in a jurisdiction that will subject a holder to
tax (and require a holder to file an income tax return with the
jurisdiction in respect to the holders share of the income
derived from that business). A prospective holder should consult
its tax adviser with respect to the availability of a credit for
such tax in the jurisdiction in which the holder is a resident.
The company should not be subject to the New York City
unincorporated business tax because such tax is not imposed on
an entity that is primarily engaged in the purchase and sale of
securities for its own account. By reason of a
similar own account exemption, it is also expected
that a nonresident individual U.S. holder should not be
subject to New York State personal income tax with respect to
his or her share of income or gain recognized by us. New York
State and New York City residents will be subject to New York
State and New York City personal income tax on their income
recognized in respect of the shares. Because the company may
conduct its business, in part, in New York City, corporate
U.S. holders generally will be subject to the New York
State franchise tax and the New York City general corporation
tax by reason of their investment in the company, unless certain
exemptions apply. However, pursuant to regulations, the company
may qualify as a portfolio investment partnership.
Accordingly, non-New York corporate U.S. holders not
otherwise subject to New York State franchise tax or New York
City general corporation tax may not be subject to such tax
solely by reason of investing in shares. No ruling from the New
York State Department of Taxation and Finance or the New York
City Department of Finance has been, or will be, requested
regarding such matters.
Backup
Withholding
The company is required in certain circumstances to backup
withhold on certain payments paid to noncorporate holders of the
companys shares who do not furnish the company with their
correct taxpayer identification number (in the case of
individuals, their social security number) and certain
certifications, or
46
who are otherwise subject to backup withholding. Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld from
payments made to you may be refunded or credited against your
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Holders should be aware that certain aspects of the
U.S. federal, state and local income tax treatment
regarding the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares are
not clear under existing law. Thus, we urge holders to consult
their own tax advisers to determine the tax consequences of
ownership of the shares in their particular circumstances,
including the application of U.S. federal, state, local and
foreign tax laws.
47
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We may sell, and our Manager may sell, shares of trust stock in
any one or more of the following ways from time to time:
(i) through agents; (ii) to or through underwriters;
(iii) through brokers or dealers; (iv) directly by us
or our Manager to purchasers, including through a specific
bidding, auction or other process; or (v) through a
combination of any of these methods of sale. The applicable
prospectus supplement or term sheet will contain the terms of
the transaction, name or names of any underwriters, dealers,
agents and the respective amounts of shares underwritten or
purchased by them, the public offering price of the shares, and
the applicable agents commission, dealers purchase
price or underwriters discount. Our Manager or any dealers
and agents participating in the distribution of the shares may
be deemed to be underwriters, and compensation received by them
on resale of the shares may be deemed to be underwriting
discounts. Additionally, because our Manager may be deemed to be
an underwriter within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act, our Manager may be
subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the
Securities Act.
Any initial offering price, dealer purchase price, discount or
commission may be changed from time to time.
The shares may be distributed from time to time in one or more
transactions, at negotiated prices, at a fixed price or fixed
prices (that may be subject to change), at market prices
prevailing at the time of sale, at various prices determined at
the time of sale or at prices related to prevailing market
prices.
Offers to purchase shares may be solicited directly by us or our
Manager or by agents designated by us from time to time. Any
such agent may be deemed to be an underwriter, as that term is
defined in the Securities Act, of the shares so offered and sold.
If underwriters are utilized in the sale of any shares in
respect of which this prospectus is being delivered, such shares
will be acquired by the underwriters for their own account and
may be resold from time to time in one or more transactions,
including negotiated transactions, at fixed public offering
prices or at varying prices determined by the underwriters at
the time of sale. Shares may be offered to the public either
through underwriting syndicates represented by managing
underwriters or directly by one or more underwriters. If any
underwriter or underwriters are utilized in the sale of shares,
unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, the obligations of the underwriters are subject to
certain conditions precedent and the underwriters will be
obligated to purchase all such shares if any are purchased.
If a dealer is utilized in the sale of the shares in respect of
which this prospectus is delivered, we will sell, and our
Manager will sell, shares of trust stock to the dealer, as
principal. The dealer may then resell such shares to the public
at varying prices to be determined by such dealer at the time of
resale. Transactions through brokers or dealers may include
block trades in which brokers or dealers will attempt to sell
shares as agent but may position and resell as principal to
facilitate the transaction, or in crosses in which the same
broker or dealer acts as agent on both sides of the trade. Any
such dealer may be deemed to be an underwriter, as such term is
defined in the Securities Act, of the shares so offered and
sold. In addition, our Manager may sell shares in ordinary
brokerage transactions or in transactions in which a broker
solicits purchases.
Offers to purchase shares may be solicited directly by us or by
our Manager and the sale thereof may be made by us or our
Manager directly to institutional investors or others, who may
be deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the
Securities Act with respect to any resale thereof.
Our Manager may also resell all or a portion of its shares in
transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 144 under the
Securities Act, provided they meet the criteria and conform to
the requirements of that rule, Section 4(1) of the
Securities Act or other applicable exemptions, regardless of
whether the shares are covered by the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part.
If so indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement or term
sheet, we may, or our Manager may, authorize agents and
underwriters to solicit offers by certain institutions to
purchase shares from us or our Manager at the public offering
price set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement or term
sheet pursuant
48
to delayed delivery contracts providing for payment and delivery
on the date or dates stated in the applicable prospectus
supplement. Such delayed delivery contracts will be subject only
to those conditions set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
Agents, underwriters and dealers may be entitled under relevant
agreements with us or our Manager to indemnification by us
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act, or to contribution with respect to payments
which such agents, underwriters and dealers may be required to
make in respect thereof. The terms and conditions of any
indemnification or contribution will be described in the
applicable prospectus supplement or term sheet. We will pay all
expenses incurred with respect to the registration of the shares
owned by our Manager, other than underwriting fees, discounts or
commissions, which will be borne by our Manager.
We may, or our Manager may, also sell shares through various
arrangements involving mandatorily or optionally exchangeable
securities, and this prospectus may be delivered in connection
with those sales.
We may, or our Manager may, enter into derivative, sale or
forward sale transactions with third parties, or sell shares not
covered by this prospectus to third parties in privately
negotiated transactions. If the applicable prospectus supplement
or term sheet indicates, in connection with those transactions,
the third parties may sell shares covered by this prospectus and
the applicable prospectus supplement or term sheet, including in
short sale transactions and by issuing shares not covered by
this prospectus but convertible into or exchangeable for or
representing beneficial interests in such shares, or the return
of which is derived in whole or in part from the value of such
shares. If so, the third party may use shares received under
those sales, forward sale or derivative arrangements or shares
pledged by us or our Manager or borrowed from us, our Manager or
others to settle those sales or to close out any related open
borrowings of shares, and may use shares received from us or our
Manager in settlement of those transactions to close out any
related open borrowings of shares. The third party in such sale
transactions will be an underwriter and will be identified in
the applicable prospectus supplement (or a post-effective
amendment).
Additionally, our Manager may engage in hedging transactions
with broker-dealers in connection with distributions of shares
or otherwise. In those transactions, broker-dealers may engage
in short sales of shares in the course of hedging the positions
they assume with our Manager. Our Manager also may sell shares
short and redeliver shares to close out such short positions.
Our Manager may also enter into option or other transactions
with broker-dealers which require the delivery of shares to the
broker-dealer. The broker-dealer may then resell or otherwise
transfer such shares pursuant to this prospectus. Our Manager
also may loan or pledge shares, and the borrower or pledgee may
sell or otherwise transfer the shares so loaned or pledged
pursuant to this prospectus. Such borrower or pledgee also may
transfer those shares to investors in our shares or our
Managers securities or in connection with the offering of
other securities not covered by this prospectus.
Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive compensation
in the form of commissions, discounts or concessions from us or
our Manager. Underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may also
receive compensation from the purchasers of shares for whom they
act as agents or to whom they sell as principals, or both.
Compensation as to a particular underwriter, broker-dealer or
agent might be in excess of customary commissions and will be in
amounts to be negotiated in connection with transactions
involving shares. In effecting sales, broker-dealers engaged by
us or our Manager may arrange for other broker-dealers to
participate in the resales.
Agents, underwriters and dealers may engage in transactions
with, or perform services for, us or our Manager and our
respective subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business.
Any underwriter may engage in overallotment, stabilizing
transactions, short covering transactions and penalty bids in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Overallotment involves sales in excess of the offering size,
which create a short position. Stabilizing transactions permit
bids to purchase the underlying shares so long as the
stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum. Short
covering transactions involve purchases of the shares in the
open market after the distribution is completed to cover short
positions. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a
selling concession from a dealer when the
49
shares originally sold by the dealer are purchased in a covering
transaction to cover short positions. Those activities may cause
the price of the shares to be higher than it would otherwise be.
If commenced, the underwriters may discontinue any of the
activities at any time. An underwriter may carry out these
transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in the
over-the-counter
market or otherwise.
The place and time of delivery for the shares will be set forth
in the accompanying prospectus supplement or term sheet for such
shares.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares offered in this prospectus is being
passed upon for us and our Manager by Potter Anderson &
Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delaware. Certain legal matters in
connection with the shares offered hereby will be passed upon
for us and our Manager by Shearman & Sterling LLP, New
York, New York.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Macquarie
Infrastructure Company Trust as of December 31, 2005 and
2004, and the year ended December 31, 2005 and the period
April 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity
(deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of
North America Capital Holding Company for the periods
January 1, 2004 through July 29, 2004, July 30,
2004 through December 22, 2004, and for the year ended
December 31, 2003, and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005 have been incorporated by reference
herein in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, incorporated by reference
herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The report of KPMG LLP dated March 10, 2006, except as to
the fifth and sixth paragraphs of Managements Report on
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (as restated), which
are as of October 13, 2006, on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses such
firms opinion that Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust
did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of
a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the
control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that
states as a result of its evaluation of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting, management has
identified a material weakness. Specifically, the internal
accounting staff did not possess sufficient technical expertise
to ensure the correct application of hedge accounting in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. This material weakness resulted in the
restatement of previously filed unaudited financial statements
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30,
2006, as well as unaudited 2005 quarterly financial statements.
The report of KPMG LLP dated March 10, 2006, except as to
the fifth and sixth paragraphs of Managements Report on
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting (as restated), which
are as of October 13, 2006, on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, contains an
explanatory paragraph that states Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust acquired Eagle Aviation Resources, Ltd. (EAR), on
August 12, 2005, and acquired SunPark on October 3,
2005. Management excluded from its assessment of the
effectiveness of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trusts
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, both EARs and SunParks
internal control over financial reporting. The EAR assets
represent 4.6% of the Companys total assets at
December 31, 2005, and generated 4.1% of the Companys
total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005. The
SunPark assets represent 5.5% of the Companys total assets
at December 31, 2005 and generated 1% of the Companys
total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005.
Such firms audit of internal control over financial
reporting of Macquarie Infrastructure
50
Company Trust also excluded an evaluation of the internal
control over financial reporting of both EAR and SunPark.
The consolidated balance sheet of Connect M1-A1 Holdings Limited
and subsidiary, as of March 31, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
deficit and other comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for
the year ended March 31, 2006, incorporated in this
prospectus by reference from the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 29, 2006, have been
audited by KPMG LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their
report, which is incorporated herein by reference, and has been
so incorporated in reliance upon the report of such firm given
upon their authority of said firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of K-1 HGC Investment, LLC
and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2006 and for the period
from July 1, 2005 to April 30, 2006, and as of
June 30, 2005 and 2004, and for the year ended
June 30, 2005 and the period from August 8, 2003 (date
of inception) to June 30, 2004, incorporated in this
prospectus by reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 27, 2006, have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated
in their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference,
and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of
such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting
and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Loving Enterprises,
Inc. (currently known as IMTT Holdings, Inc.) as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2005 appearing in the
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 16, 2006 have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon dated
April 14, 2006 included therein, and incorporated herein by
reference. Such financial statements are, and audited financial
statements of IMTT Holdings, Inc. to be included in subsequently
filed documents of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and
Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC will be, incorporated
herein in reliance upon the reports of Ernst & Young
LLP pertaining to such financial statements (to the extent
covered by consents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission) given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Eagle Aviation
Resources, Ltd. as of December 31, 2004, and the related
statement of income, members equity, and cash flows for
the year then ended, incorporated in this prospectus by
reference from the Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and Macquarie
Infrastructure Company LLC filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 4, 2005, have been audited
by L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC, independent auditors,
as stated in their report, which are incorporated herein by
reference, and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the
reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
51
7,500,000 Shares
Macquarie Infrastructure
Company Trust
Each Share of Trust Stock
Represents One Beneficial Interest in the Trust
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Citigroup
Credit Suisse
A.G. Edwards
Jefferies &
Company
Macquarie Securities (USA)
Inc.
Stifel Nicolaus
, 2006