Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission file number 001-34095
FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
39-1576570 |
|
|
|
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
401 Charmany Drive Madison, WI
|
|
53719 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(608) 238-8008
Telephone
number
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data Field required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non- accelerated filer. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants sole class of common stock, par value $0.01
per share, on April 22, 2010 was 2,539,992 shares.
[This page intentionally left blank]
2
FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
INDEX FORM 10-Q
1
PART I. Financial Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
8,031 |
|
|
$ |
8,566 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
79,077 |
|
|
|
104,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,108 |
|
|
|
112,737 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
131,869 |
|
|
|
122,286 |
|
Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $15,342 and $14,124, respectively |
|
|
839,382 |
|
|
|
839,807 |
|
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
Foreclosed properties |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
16,423 |
|
|
|
16,254 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,101,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
964,547 |
|
|
$ |
984,374 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings |
|
|
57,513 |
|
|
|
57,515 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
13,917 |
|
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,046,292 |
|
|
|
1,063,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 2,618,010 and 2,616,010 shares issued, 2,540,141 and
2,539,306 outstanding at 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
24,867 |
|
|
|
24,731 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
30,302 |
|
|
|
29,582 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
Treasury stock (77,869 and 76,704 shares at 2010 and 2009, respectively), at cost |
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
55,490 |
|
|
|
54,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,101,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,117,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
13,190 |
|
|
$ |
12,555 |
|
Securities |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
14,366 |
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
6,464 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
6,503 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment services income |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life
insurance |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Loan fees |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Credit, merchant and debit card fees |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Other |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
FDIC Insurance |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Collateral liquidation costs |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Loss on foreclosed properties, net |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
6,544 |
|
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
Dividends declared per share |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
24,088 |
|
|
$ |
29,252 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
(1,425 |
) |
|
$ |
53,006 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
Unrealized securities
gains arising during
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
Unrealized derivative
losses arising during
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Reclassification
adjustment for
realized losses on
derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406 |
|
Share-based compensation restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Cash dividends ($0.07 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased (1,027 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
24,260 |
|
|
$ |
28,881 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
$ |
(1,438 |
) |
|
$ |
53,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
24,731 |
|
|
$ |
29,582 |
|
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
54,393 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
Unrealized securities
gains arising during
the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
Share-based compensation restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
Cash dividends ($0.07 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased (1,165 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
24,867 |
|
|
$ |
30,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
$ |
(1,501 |
) |
|
$ |
55,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
First Business Financial Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Origination of loans for sale |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
Sale of loans originated for sale |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
Gain on sale of loans originated for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Loss on foreclosed properties and repossessed assets |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
7,013 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(18,842 |
) |
|
|
(5,286 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed properties and repossessed assets |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans and leases |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(10,160 |
) |
Purchases of leasehold improvements and equipment, net |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
Purchase of cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(10,110 |
) |
|
|
(8,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
|
|
(19,827 |
) |
|
|
51,496 |
|
Repayment of FHLB advances |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(15,003 |
) |
Net decrease in short-term borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,000 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(20,019 |
) |
|
|
14,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(25,629 |
) |
|
|
7,499 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
112,737 |
|
|
|
23,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
87,108 |
|
|
$ |
31,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on deposits and borrowings |
|
$ |
5,960 |
|
|
$ |
7,192 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Transfer to foreclosed properties and repossessed assets |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts and results of First Business
Financial Services, Inc. (FBFS or the Corporation), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, First
Business Bank and First Business Bank Milwaukee. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note 2 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The Corporation has not changed its
significant accounting and reporting policies from those disclosed in the Corporations Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no significant changes in the methods or
assumptions used in accounting policies requiring material estimates and assumptions.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary
for a fair presentation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included in
the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the three month
period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any
other interim period or the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. Certain amounts in prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Subsequent events have
been evaluated through the issuance of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets. In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) which eliminates the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets
and requires additional disclosures about a transferors continuing involvement in transferred
financial assets. This pronouncement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. The recognition and measurement provisions regarding transfers
of financial assets shall be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. The
disclosure requirements must be applied to transfers that occurred before and after the effective
date. The Corporation adopted this new pronouncement on January 1, 2010, as required. The sale
accounting treatment for the Corporations participation loans have been evaluated in accordance
with the new standard. Refer to Note 7 Loans and Leases for additional information. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements
of the Corporation.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17,
Consolidation (Topic 810) Improvements to Financial Reporting for Enterprises Involved with
Variable Interest Entities, amending prior guidance to change how a company determines when an
entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights)
should be consolidated. This statement requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in
a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics:
|
|
|
The power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance; and |
5
|
|
|
The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to
the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. |
Ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity are required. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard on January 1, 2010, as
required. There was no impact to the unaudited consolidated financial statements due to the
adoption of this standard.
Consolidation. In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810)
Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification which
provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify the scope
of which the decrease in ownership provisions apply or do not apply. The amendments also expand
the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or derecognition of a group of assets
within the scope of Subtopic 810-10 including the valuation techniques used to measure the fair
value of any retained investment, the nature of continuing involvement with the subsidiary and
whether the transaction that resulted in the deconsolidation of the subsidiary or the derecognition
of the group of assets was with a related party. The amendments of this update are effective
beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009.
The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity
adopted previous amendments to ASC 810-10 relating to non-controlling interests. The Corporation
adopted this accounting standard on January 1, 2010, as required. There was no impact to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements due to the adoption of this standard.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share.
Earnings per common share are computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share
are computed by dividing net income (loss) allocated to common shares by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the applicable period, excluding outstanding participating
securities. Participating securities include unvested restricted shares. Unvested restricted
shares are considered participating securities because holders of these securities receive
non-forfeitable dividends at the same rate as holders of the Corporations common stock. Diluted
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) allocated to common shares adjusted
for reallocation of undistributed earnings of unvested restricted shares by the weighted average
number of shares determined for the basic earnings per common share computation plus the dilutive
effect of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method.
For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, average anti-dilutive employee
share-based awards totaled 200,332 and 253,169, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings allocated to common stockholders |
|
$ |
173,177 |
|
|
$ |
171,187 |
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders |
|
|
702,253 |
|
|
|
(357,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for basic earnings per share |
|
|
875,430 |
|
|
|
(185,880 |
) |
Reallocation of undistributed earnings for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
875,430 |
|
|
$ |
(185,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares |
|
|
2,473,557 |
|
|
|
2,445,880 |
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive average shares |
|
|
2,473,557 |
|
|
|
2,445,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
6
Note 5 Share-Based Compensation
The Corporation adopted an equity incentive plan in 1993, as amended in 1995, an equity incentive
plan in 2001 and the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plans). The Plans are administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of FBFS and provide for the grant of equity
ownership opportunities
through incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options (Stock Options) and restricted shares.
As of March 31, 2010, 133,404 shares were available for future grants under the 2001 and 2006
Equity Incentive Plans (2001 and 2006 Plans). Shares covered by awards that expire, terminate or
lapse will again be available for the grant of awards under the 2001 and 2006 Plans. The
Corporation may issue new shares and shares from treasury for shares delivered under the Plans.
Stock Options
The Corporation may grant Stock Options to senior executives and other employees under the Plans.
Stock Options generally have an exercise price that is equal to the fair value of the common shares
on the date the option is granted. Stock Options granted under the 2001 and 2006 Plans are subject
to graded vesting, generally ranging from four to eight years, and have a contractual term of 10
years. For any new awards issued, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service
period for the entire award on a straight-line basis. The Corporation has not granted any Stock
Options since the Corporation became a public entity nor has it modified, repurchased or cancelled
any Stock Options during that period. Therefore, no stock-based compensation was recognized in the
consolidated statement of income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, except
with respect to restricted share awards. As of March 31, 2010, all Stock Options granted and not
previously forfeited have vested.
Stock Option activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 and three months ended March 31, 2010
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
157,290 |
|
|
$ |
22.07 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,500 |
) |
|
|
22.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
142,790 |
|
|
|
22.01 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
142,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
142,790 |
|
|
$ |
22.01 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
142,790 |
|
|
|
22.01 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
142,790 |
|
|
|
22.01 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares
Under the 2001 and 2006 Plans, the Corporation may grant restricted shares to plan participants,
subject to forfeiture upon the occurrence of certain events until dates specified in the
participants award agreement. While the restricted shares are subject to forfeiture, the
participant may exercise full voting rights and will receive all dividends and other distributions
paid with respect to the restricted shares. The restricted shares granted under the 2001 and 2006
Plans are subject to graded vesting. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service
period of four years for the entire award on a straight-line basis. Upon vesting of restricted
share awards, the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense is
recognized as a financing cash flow activity. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
restricted share awards vested on a date at which the market price was lower than the market value
on the date of grant; therefore, there is no excess tax benefit reflected in the consolidated
statements of cash flows for the periods.
7
Restricted share activity for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the three months ended March 31,
2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Restricted Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
104,949 |
|
|
$ |
19.12 |
|
Granted |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
10.07 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(34,273 |
) |
|
|
19.77 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,914 |
) |
|
|
19.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
70,262 |
|
|
$ |
17.88 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(7,773 |
) |
|
|
22.46 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
64,489 |
|
|
$ |
17.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, approximately $785,000 of deferred compensation expense was included in
additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheet related to unvested restricted shares
which the Corporation expects to recognize over four years. As of March 31, 2010, all restricted
shares that vested were delivered. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, share-based
compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of income (loss) totaled approximately
$136,000 and $172,000, respectively.
Note 6 Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available-for-sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
holding gains |
|
|
holding losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
126,508 |
|
|
$ |
3,062 |
|
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
129,342 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government-sponsored
enterprises |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,998 |
|
|
$ |
3,099 |
|
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
131,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
holding gains |
|
|
holding losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
116,109 |
|
|
$ |
2,615 |
|
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
118,509 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government-sponsored
enterprises |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,838 |
|
|
$ |
2,663 |
|
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
122,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations government agencies represent securities issued by the
Government National Mortgage Association. Collateralized mortgage obligations
government-sponsored enterprises include securities issued by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale by contractual
maturity at March 31, 2010 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due in one year through five years |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Due in five through ten years |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
3,941 |
|
Due in over ten years |
|
|
124,194 |
|
|
|
126,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,998 |
|
|
$ |
131,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the Corporations gross unrealized losses and fair value of investments,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual investments have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the Corporation had 17 and 10 securities that were in an unrealized loss
position, respectively. Such securities have declined in value due to the current interest rate
environment and have not experienced credit rating downgrades. At March 31, 2010 the Corporation
did not hold any securities that have been in a continuous loss position for twelve months or
greater. The Corporation also has not specifically identified securities in a loss position for
sale in the near term and does not believe that it will be required to sell any such securities.
It is expected that the Corporation will recover the entire amortized cost basis of each security
based upon an evaluation of the present value of the expected future cash flows. Accordingly, no
other than temporary impairment was recorded in the consolidated results of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
9
A summary of unrealized loss information for available-for-sale securities, categorized by security
type follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
27,612 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,612 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,612 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,612 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no sales of securities available for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, securities with a fair value of approximately $57.3
million and $55.9 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, interest rate swap
contracts and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and availability for additional advances.
Note 7 Loans and Leases
Loans and leases receivable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
First mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
442,754 |
|
|
$ |
441,806 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
57,909 |
|
|
|
64,194 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
43,833 |
|
|
|
43,959 |
|
1-4 family |
|
|
56,418 |
|
|
|
56,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans |
|
|
600,914 |
|
|
|
606,090 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
211,407 |
|
|
|
199,661 |
|
Direct financing leases, net |
|
|
25,524 |
|
|
|
27,607 |
|
Home equity loans and second mortgage |
|
|
6,369 |
|
|
|
7,879 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
10,973 |
|
|
|
13,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases receivable, gross |
|
|
855,187 |
|
|
|
854,497 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
14,124 |
|
Deferred loan fees |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases receivable, net |
|
$ |
839,382 |
|
|
$ |
839,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The total principal amount of loans transferred to third parties during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was $3.1 million. Each of the transfers of these financial assets met the
qualifications for sale
accounting, and therefore $3.1 million has been derecognized in the unaudited consolidated
financial statements. The Corporation has a continuing involvement in each of the agreements by
way of servicing the loans; however, there are no further obligations, other than standard
representations and warranties related to sold amounts, required of the Corporation in the event of
default. The loans were transferred at their fair value and no gain or loss was recognized upon
the transfer.
The total amount of loans transferred to third parties as loan participations at March 31, 2010 was
$54.6 million of which $54.6 million has been derecognized as a sale under the applicable
accounting guidance in effect at the time of the transfers of the financial assets. The
Corporation continues to have involvement with these loans by way of the relationship management
and all servicing responsibilities. As of March 31, 2010, none of the loans in this participation
sold portfolio were considered impaired nor has the Corporation recognized any charge-offs
associated with any retained portion of this pool of loans as measured by the Corporations
allowance for loan and lease loss measurement process and policies.
Non-accrual loans and leases consisted of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
8,087 |
|
|
$ |
8,482 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
1-4 family |
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans |
|
|
19,733 |
|
|
|
16,574 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
7,638 |
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
Direct financing leases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Home equity and second mortgage |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
31,618 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
Foreclosed properties and repossessed assets, net |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
32,951 |
|
|
$ |
29,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing troubled debt restructurings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans and leases to
gross loans and leases |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Total non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
to non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
48.52 |
|
|
|
50.76 |
|
11
Note 8 Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Allowance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,124 |
|
|
$ |
11,846 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate and other first mortgage |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(3,647 |
) |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2,031 |
) |
Direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
Home equity loans and second mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
Consumer and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(6,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate and other mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and second mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(5,947 |
) |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of period |
|
$ |
15,342 |
|
|
$ |
14,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to gross loans and leases |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
The following represents information regarding our impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
|
the Three |
|
|
the Year |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Impaired loans and leases with no impairment reserves required |
|
$ |
11,160 |
|
|
$ |
13,243 |
|
Impaired loans and leases with impairment reserves required |
|
|
20,458 |
|
|
|
14,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
|
31,618 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment reserve (included in allowance for loan and lease
losses) |
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
28,504 |
|
|
$ |
25,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average net impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
26,708 |
|
|
$ |
20,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foregone interest income attributable to impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foregone interest income on impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foregone interest income on impaired loans and leases for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was $337,000.
12
Note 9 Deposits
Deposits consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Transaction accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
54,733 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
87,687 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Negotiable order of withdrawal
(NOW) accounts |
|
|
83,363 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
65,191 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction accounts |
|
|
138,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
273,077 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
262,276 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
79,991 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
98,431 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
473,383 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
470,789 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
964,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
984,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Borrowings
Borrowings consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
balance |
|
|
rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
balance |
|
|
rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Fed funds purchased |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
18,503 |
|
|
|
18,504 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
18,505 |
|
|
|
18,873 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
Senior line of credit |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
Subordinated notes payable |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
10.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,828 |
|
|
$ |
67,829 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
$ |
67,830 |
|
|
$ |
69,926 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
18,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
49,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation was in compliance with its debt covenants on its Senior
line of credit. Beginning in March 2010, the Corporation pays an unused line fee on its secured
Senior line of credit. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 interest expense incurred due to
this unused line fee was approximately $1,000.
13
Note 11 Fair Value Disclosures
The Corporation determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair
value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair
value is defined as the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced
liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date and is based on exit prices vs. entry
prices. Fair value includes assumptions about risk such as nonperformance risk in liability fair
values and is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.
|
|
|
Level 1 Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement
date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included with Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Level 3 inputs are inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to
the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Corporations assessment of the significance of a
particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers
factors specific to the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value
hierarchy level, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
129,342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
129,342 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
government
sponsored
enterprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,509 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,509 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations
government
sponsored
enterprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
There were no transfers in or out of
Level 1 or 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 or the
year ended December 31, 2009.
14
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, segregated by fair value
hierarchy are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
21,861 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,621 |
|
|
$ |
4,240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreclosed properties |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,596 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,820 |
|
|
$ |
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreclosed
properties |
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(525 |
) |
Impaired loans that are collateral dependent were written down to their fair value of $21.9 million
and $17.6 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, through the establishment of
specific reserves or by recording charge-offs when the carrying value exceeded the fair value.
Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income approach, or cost approach were
used to measure fair value and primarily included observable inputs for the individual impaired
loans being evaluated such as recent sales of similar assets or observable market data for
operational or carrying costs. In cases where such inputs were unobservable, the loan balance is
reflected within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Certain non-financial assets subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis included
goodwill and foreclosed properties. Foreclosed properties, upon initial recognition, are remeasured
and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan and lease losses, if
deemed necessary, based upon the fair value of the foreclosed property. The fair value of a
foreclosed property, upon initial recognition, is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on
observable market data, typically an appraisal, or Level 3 inputs based upon assumptions specific
to the individual property or equipment. Subsequent impairments of foreclosed properties are
recorded as a loss on foreclosed properties. During the three months ended March 31, 2010,
approximately $143,000 of outstanding loans were transferred to foreclosed properties as the
Corporation claimed title to the respective assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2010,
the Corporation completed an evaluation of certain of its foreclosed assets. Based upon the
evaluation and the results of the impairment calculation, we recognized impairment losses of
approximately $121,000 on foreclosed properties. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
foreclosed properties, at fair value, were $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively.
The Corporations goodwill is not amortized but is subject to an annual impairment evaluation. The
Corporation conducts its annual evaluation in June of each year. Based upon the results of this
analysis, the fair value of the Corporations subsidiary reporting unit goodwill exceeds the
carrying value of its assets and liabilities and, therefore, no impairment was necessary. The
goodwill impairment evaluation utilized a discounted cash flow method with further evaluation of
the consolidated entity market capitalization. A series of assumptions, including the discount rate
applied to the estimated future cash flows, were embedded within the evaluation. These assumptions
and estimates are subject to changes. There can be no assurances that discount rates will not
increase, projected earnings and cash flows of our subsidiary reporting unit will not decline, and
facts and circumstances influencing our consolidated market capitalization will not change.
Accordingly, an impairment charge to goodwill may be required in the foreseeable future if the book
equity of our subsidiary reporting unit exceeds its fair value. An impairment
charge to goodwill could have an adverse impact on future consolidated results of operations. On a
quarterly basis, the Corporation continues to evaluate the business climate and elements affecting
the reliability of the estimated cash flows utilized in the annual impairment calculation to assess
if triggering events have occurred. For the period subsequent to the most recent annual evaluation
period, no additional triggering events occurred.
15
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Corporation is required to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair
value estimates, methods, and assumptions, consistent with exit price concepts for fair value
measurements, are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
87,108 |
|
|
$ |
87,108 |
|
|
$ |
112,737 |
|
|
$ |
112,737 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
131,869 |
|
|
|
131,869 |
|
|
|
122,286 |
|
|
|
122,286 |
|
Loans and lease receivables |
|
|
839,382 |
|
|
|
820,042 |
|
|
|
839,807 |
|
|
|
820,286 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
Cash surrender value of life
insurance |
|
|
16,423 |
|
|
|
16,423 |
|
|
|
16,254 |
|
|
|
16,254 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
964,547 |
|
|
$ |
977,997 |
|
|
$ |
984,374 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,027 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and
other borrowings |
|
|
57,513 |
|
|
|
57,978 |
|
|
|
57,515 |
|
|
|
58,125 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
7,225 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off balance sheet items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, for which it is practicable to
estimate that value, is required whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. In
cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using
present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the
assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard,
the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and,
in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Certain financial
instruments and all non-financial instruments are excluded from the disclosure requirements.
Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent the underlying
value of the Corporation.
The carrying amounts reported for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and
accrued interest payable approximate fair value because of their short-term nature and because they
do not present unanticipated credit concerns.
16
Securities: The fair value measurements of investment securities are determined by a third party
pricing service which considers observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads,
cash flows, the
U.S. Treasury yield curve, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit
information and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things.
Loans and Leases: Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash
flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market rates that reflect the credit and
interest rate risk inherent in the portfolio of loans and then applying a discount factor based
upon the embedded credit risk of the loan to derive an exit price value. The estimate of maturity
is based on the Banks historical experience with repayments for each loan classification,
modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: The carrying amount of FHLB stock equals its fair value because the
shares may be redeemed by the FHLB at their carrying amount of $100 per share amount.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance: The carrying amount of the cash surrender value of life
insurance approximates its fair value as the carrying value represents the current settlement
amount.
Deposits: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as demand deposits and money
market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of time deposits is
based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the
rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value estimates do not
include the intangible value that results from the funding provided by deposit liabilities compared
to borrowing funds in the market.
Borrowed Funds: Market rates currently available to the Corporation and Banks for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risks: The fair value of the Corporations
off-balance sheet instruments is based on quoted market prices and fees currently charged to enter
into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the credit
standing of the related counter party.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally not marketable.
Furthermore, interest rates on any amounts drawn under such commitments would generally be
established at market rates at the time of the draw. Fair value would principally derive from the
present value of fees received for those products.
Interest Rate Swaps: The carrying amount and fair value of existing derivative financial
instruments are based upon independent valuation models, which use widely accepted valuation
techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative
contract. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to
maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities. The Corporation incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect
both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair
value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Corporation has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any
premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporations entire
holding of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of the Corporations financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding
future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various
financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
17
Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting
to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that
are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value
estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation offers interest rate swap products directly to qualified commercial borrowers. The
Corporation economically hedges client derivative transactions by entering into offsetting interest
rate swap contracts executed with a third party. Derivative transactions executed as part of this
program are not designated as accounting hedge relationships and are marked-to-market through
earnings each period. The derivative contracts have mirror-image terms, which results in the
positions changes in fair value primarily offsetting through earnings each period. The credit
risk and risk of non-performance embedded in the fair value calculations is different between the
dealer counterparties and the commercial borrowers which may result in a difference in the changes
in the fair value of the mirror image swaps. The Corporation incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the counterpartys risk
in the fair value measurements. When evaluating the fair value of its derivative contracts for the
effects of non-performance and credit risk, the Corporation considered the impact of netting and
any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds and guarantees.
At March 31, 2010, the aggregate amortizing notional value of interest rate swaps with various
commercial borrowers was approximately $50.2 million. The Corporation receives fixed rates and
pays floating rates based upon LIBOR on the swaps with commercial borrowers. The aggregate
amortizing notional value of interest rate swaps with dealer counterparties was also approximately
$50.2 million. The Corporation pays fixed rates and receives floating rates based upon LIBOR on the
swaps with dealer counterparties. These interest rate swaps mature in 2013 through 2019. The
commercial borrower swaps were reported on the Corporations balance sheet as a derivative asset of
$1.8 million, included in accrued interest receivable and other assets, and a derivative liability
of $55,000, included in accrued interest and other liabilities as of March 31, 2010. Dealer
counterparty swaps were reported on the Corporations balance sheet as a net derivative liability
of $1.8 million due to master netting and settlement contracts with dealer counterparties and is
included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities as of March 31, 2010.
The table below provides information about the location and fair value of the Corporations
derivative instruments as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap Contracts |
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
18
The location and amount of gains and losses reported in the consolidated statements of income
(loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Instrument |
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps
non hedge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
Interest rate swaps
nonhedge |
|
$ |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Instrument |
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Interest rate swaps
hedge |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps
non hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
690 |
|
Interest rate swaps
non hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
- Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
When used in this report, and in any oral statements made with the approval of an authorized
executive officer, the words or phrases may, could, should, hope, might, believe,
expect, plan, assume, intend, estimate, anticipate, project, likely, or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, changes in economic conditions in the
market area of FBB or FBB Milwaukee, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuation in
interest rates, demand for loans in the market area of FBB or FBB Milwaukee, borrowers defaulting
in the repayment of loans and competition. These risks could cause actual results to differ
materially from what FBFS has anticipated or projected. These risk factors and uncertainties
should be carefully considered by potential investors. See Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for discussion relating to risk factors
impacting the Corporation. Investors should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made. The factors described within this Form 10-Q
could affect the financial performance of FBFS and could cause actual results for future periods to
differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods.
19
Where any such forward-looking statement includes a statement of the assumptions or bases
underlying such forward-looking statement, FBFS cautions that, while its management believes such
assumptions or bases are reasonable and are made in good faith, assumed facts or bases can vary
from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be
material, depending on the circumstances. Where, in any forward-looking statement, an expectation
or belief is expressed as to future results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith
and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of
expectation or belief will result in, or be achieved or accomplished.
FBFS does not intend to, and specifically disclaims any obligation to, update any forward-looking
statements.
The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant events and
factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of FBFS for the periods
indicated. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the Notes thereto presented in this Form 10-Q.
General
Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this Report
to First Business Financial Services, the Corporation, FBFS, we, us, our, or similar
references mean First Business Financial Services, Inc. together with our subsidiaries. First
Business Bank or First Business Bank Milwaukee or the Banks are used to refer to our
subsidiaries, First Business Bank and First Business Bank Milwaukee, alone.
Overview
FBFS is a registered bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Wisconsin and
is engaged in the commercial banking business through its wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, First
Business Bank and First Business Bank Milwaukee. All of the operations of FBFS are conducted
through the Banks and certain subsidiaries of First Business Bank. The Corporation operates as a
business bank focusing on delivering a full line of commercial banking products and services
tailored to meet the specific needs of small and medium sized businesses, business owners,
executives, professionals and high net worth individuals. The Corporation does not utilize a branch
network to attract retail clients.
General Overview
|
|
|
Total assets were $1.102 billion as of March 31, 2010 compared to $1.117 billion as of
December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $899,000 compared to a net
loss of $193,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin increased to 3.00% for the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to 2.65% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Top line revenue increased 17.7% to $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to $8.1 million for the comparable period of the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Loan and lease loss provision was $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to $2.2 million for same time period in the prior year. Allowance for loan
and lease loss as a percentage of gross loans and leases was 1.79% at March 31, 2010
compared to 1.65% at December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.35
compared to diluted loss per common share of $0.08 for the three months ended March 31,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized return on average equity and return on average assets were 6.46% and
0.33%, respectively for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, compared to (1.43)%
and (0.08)%, respectively, for the same time period in 2009. |
20
Results of Operations
Top
Line Revenue. Top line revenue is comprised of net interest income and non-interest income.
This measurement is also commonly referred to as operating revenue. Top line revenue grew 17.7%
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The
components of top line revenue were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
7,847 |
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Non-interest income |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total top line revenue |
|
$ |
9,476 |
|
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net Income. Adjusted net income is comprised of our net income as presented under
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) adjusted for the after tax effects of the provision
for loan and lease losses and actual net charge-offs incurred during the year. Historically, we
have experienced significant organic growth in our loan and lease portfolio. As a result of this
organic growth and the need for an additional provision for loan and lease losses required to
support the increased inherent risk associated with a growing portfolio, we adjust our GAAP net
income to add back the after tax effects of the provision for loan and lease losses and to reduce
GAAP net income by the related after tax net charge-off activities to allow our management to
better analyze the growth of our earnings, including a comparison to our benchmark peers.
Institutions with different loan and lease growth rates may not have comparable provisions for loan
and lease loss amounts and net charge-off activity. Primarily due to a lower level of loan
charge-off activity in the first three months of 2010 compared to the first three months of 2009,
our adjusted net income has significantly improved by 250.2%. In our judgment, presenting net
income excluding the after tax effects of the provision for loan and lease losses and including
actual net charge-offs allows investors to trend, analyze and benchmark our results of operations
in a more meaningful manner. Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income derived in accordance with
GAAP. A reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted net income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Net income (loss), presented under US GAAP |
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses, after tax |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
(38.8 |
)% |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs, after tax |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
(88.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Return
on Equity. Return on equity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 6.46%, compared
to (1.43)% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in return on equity from the
three-month comparable period of the prior year is primarily attributable to the increase in net
income. We view return on equity to be an important measurement to monitor profitability and we are
continuing to focus on improving our return on equity throughout 2010 by enhancing the overall
profitability of our client relationships, controlling our expenses and minimizing our costs of
credit.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income depends on the amounts of and yields on interest-earning
assets as compared to the amounts of and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest
income is sensitive to changes in market rates of interest and the asset/liability management
procedures we use in responding to such changes. Net interest income increased by $1.4 million, or
20.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The
increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to favorable rate variances, which added
approximately $1.3 million to net interest income. The Federal Reserve held interest rates
relatively consistent for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009. Therefore the
majority of the increase in net interest income associated with rate variances was caused by
pricing loans and deposits commensurate with current market conditions and demands. Average
earning assets increased $70.3 million, or 7.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009. Increased average earning assets as well as changes in the balances
and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities added approximately $300,000 to net
interest income during the first three months of 2010 compared to the same time period in 2009.
Net interest margin increased 35 basis points to 3.00% for the three months ended March 31, 2010
from 2.65% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The improvement in net interest margin is
primarily due to a 53 basis point decline in cost of interest bearing liabilities to 2.71% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 from 3.24% for the comparable period of 2009 partially offset by
a decline of 17 basis points of yield on average earning assets to 5.48% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 from 5.65% for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The yield on average earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was negatively
affected by approximately 20 basis points by an increase in low yielding short-term investments
held at the Federal Reserve Bank compared to a negative effect of 3 basis points in the comparable
period of 2009. Additionally, the increased level of non-accrual loans and leases had a negative
impact of 18 basis points during the first three months of 2010 compared to negative impact of 14
basis points during the first three months of 2009. Partially offsetting these factors was a
positive impact of approximately 17 basis points during the three months ended March 31, 2010 due
to the collection of fees in lieu of interest compared to 1 basis point during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The increase in the amount of fees collected in lieu of interest will vary
with the number and amount of loans where such fees are charged. Despite the negative effects
discussed, the yield on our loan and lease portfolio increased by 31 basis points to 6.18% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 from 5.87% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
improvement in the overall yields on the loan and lease portfolio is mainly the result of pricing
and mix of the loan and lease portfolio as we continue to improve our credit spreads on our fixed
rate loan portfolio commensurate with current economic conditions and market needs and a continued
increase in the dollar amount and number of loans with floor interest rates in excess of the
current market rates.
The overall weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.71% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 a decrease of 53 basis points from 3.24% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The decrease in the overall rate on the liability portfolio is primarily caused by
the replacement of maturing brokered certificates of deposits at lower current market rates.
We expect to have continued elevated levels of non-accrual loans and the predictability of the
payments collected in lieu of interest is uncertain; however, we believe that current market
conditions will support continued improvement in pricing on our loan and deposit products.
Therefore, we believe that our net interest margin will remain stable for 2010, although no
assurances can be given. The net interest margin is dependent upon various factors, including
competitive pricing pressures, balance sheet mix from client
behavior relative to loan or deposit products, asset liability management strategies employed by us
and the slope of the yield curve in the future.
22
Average Interest-Earning Assets, Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities and Interest Rate Spread.
The table below shows our average balances, interest, average rates, net interest margin and the
spread between the combined average rates earned on interest-earning assets and average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. The average balances are derived from
average daily balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
yield/cost |
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
yield/cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate and other mortgage loans(1) |
|
$ |
603,692 |
|
|
$ |
8,467 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
$ |
575,359 |
|
|
$ |
7,888 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
Commercial and industrial loans(1) |
|
|
204,499 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
|
227,716 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
Direct financing leases(1) |
|
|
26,576 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
30,457 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
22,225 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases receivable(1) |
|
|
853,426 |
|
|
|
13,190 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
855,757 |
|
|
|
12,555 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
Mortgage-related securities(2) |
|
|
125,775 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
108,290 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
66,398 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,047,966 |
|
|
|
14,366 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
977,710 |
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
47,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,095,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,015,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
72,629 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
53,844 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
Money market |
|
|
267,756 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
176,812 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
88,253 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
116,479 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
464,657 |
|
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
|
479,905 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
893,295 |
|
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
827,040 |
|
|
|
6,465 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
18,503 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
19,987 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
39,010 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
45,904 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
961,123 |
|
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
903,246 |
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
78,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,039,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
961,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
55,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,095,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,015,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,847 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
86,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.65 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
109.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense to average assets |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average balances of loans and leases include non-performing loans and leases. Interest
income related to non-performing loans and leases is recognized when collected. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes amortized cost basis of assets available for sale. |
23
The table below provides information with respect to (1) the change in interest income
attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), (2) the change in
interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate) and
(3) the change in interest income attributable to changes in rate/volume (changes in rate
multiplied by changes in volume) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same
period of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Interest-Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate and other mortgage loans |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
236 |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases receivable |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
635 |
|
Mortgage-related securities |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
change in income on interest-earning assets |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Money market |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other borrowings |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
Junior subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in net interest income |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
(196 |
) |
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses. The provision for loan and lease losses totaled $1.3
million and $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our
provision for loan and lease losses is determined based upon credit risk and other subjective
factors pursuant to our allowance for loan and lease loss methodology, the magnitude of net
charge-offs recorded in the period and the amount of reserves established for impaired loans that
present collateral shortfall positions. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the factors
influencing the provision for loan and lease losses were the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Changes in the provision for loan and lease losses
associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establishment/modification of specific reserves on impaired
loans, net |
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
Increase in allowance for loan and lease loss reserve due to
subjective factor changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
Amount necessary to cover higher than anticipated charge-offs |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Change in inherent risk of the loan and lease portfolio |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan and lease losses |
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to Asset Quality for further information.
24
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income, consisting primarily of fees earned for trust and
investment services, service charges on deposits, income from bank-owned life insurance and loan
fees, remained flat at $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Trust and investment services fee income increased $133,000, or 30.6%, to $567,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 from $434,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Trust and
investment services fee income is driven by the amount of assets under management and
administration and is influenced by the timing and volatility of the equity markets coupled with
our ability to continue to add clients to our portfolio. At March 31, 2010, we had $357.9 million
of trust assets under management compared to $323.3 million at December 31, 2009 and $238.3 at
March 31, 2009. Assets under administration were $117.2 million at March 31, 2010 compared to
$124.2 million at December 31, 2009 and $102.9 million at March 31, 2009. Our sales pipeline
continues to be strong and we expect to continue to increase our assets under management. Trust
and investment services fee income will continue to be affected by market volatility for the
foreseeable future.
Service charges on deposits increased $64,000, or 19.2%, to $398,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 from $334,000 for the same period in 2009. The increase in service charge income
relates to a more disciplined approach to charging clients for services that they use, a focus on
promoting additional treasury management services to existing Bank clients and new initiatives to
spur deposit activity and subsequent service charge growth.
We offer interest rate swap products directly to our qualified commercial borrowers. We
economically hedge these client derivative transactions by simultaneously entering into offsetting
interest rate swap contracts with dealer counterparties. Derivative transactions executed as part
of this program are not designated as accounting hedge relationships and are marked-to-market
through earnings each period. The demand for this product has significantly declined due to
movement in interest rates and a more normal correlation of key rates.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not enter into any new derivative
transactions. We recorded in the consolidated income statements a gain relating to the initial
fair value recognition for the swaps which totaled $223,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and this is included in other income. No gains were recognized for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. Changes in fair value of
non-hedge derivative contracts are included in other income in the consolidated statements of
income (loss). The derivative contracts have mirror-image terms, which results in the positions
changes in fair value primarily offsetting through earnings each period. Each of the swap
contracts include a credit valuation which was not a significant component of the fair value of the
interest rate swap contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized approximately $92,000 of gains on sale of leased assets
that were at or near the end of the lease terms. In the comparable period of 2009, we recognized
losses of approximately $2,000. Gains on sale of leased equipment are included in other income in
the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased by $383,000, or 6.2%, to $6.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 from $6.2 million for the comparable period of 2009. The
increase in non-interest expense is caused by several factors including increased FDIC insurance
expense, increased compensation expense, and losses incurred on foreclosed properties, partially
offset by decreased amounts of collateral liquidation costs.
FDIC insurance expense was $782,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of
$447,000, or 133.4%, from $335,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. On December 30,
2009, the Banks prepaid their 2010 2012 FDIC premiums and we are amortizing the expense over the
coverage period. The increase in FDIC insurance is due to overall higher premium rates due to
enacted regulations, increased costs due to our participation in the temporary liquidity guarantee
program as well as the increased rate applied to the Banks overall larger deposit base.
25
Compensation expense increased by $322,000, or 10.1%, to $3.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 from $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The overall increase
in compensation expense relates to the level of the non-equity incentive compensation accrual
recorded. We currently expect to achieve a higher level of income and return on equity in 2010 and
therefore have increased our accruals associated with our non-equity incentive compensation
program.
The net loss on foreclosed properties increased to $113,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2010 from zero for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase is associated with the
results of impairment evaluations on certain of our foreclosed properties. Based upon our most
recent evaluation, we identified further deterioration in the fair values of certain foreclosed
properties. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $121,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 to reduce the carrying values to the best estimate of fair value as of
the measurement period. This impairment charge was partially offset by gains of approximately
$8,000 on sales of foreclosed properties in our existing foreclosed property portfolio. We did not
sell any foreclosed properties nor recognize any impairment losses on foreclosed properties during
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Collateral liquidation costs associated with certain of our problem commercial loans for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 were $224,000, a decrease of approximately 60.1%, from $562,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. These expenses represent costs incurred to work through our
impaired loans. Collateral liquidation costs include legal expenses, rent expenses, shipping costs,
warranty expenses, taxes incurred by the client and other necessary expenses required to protect
our security interest. The primary reason for the decline in the expenses is due to an unusual,
disproportionate amount of costs incurred on one particular credit during the first quarter of 2009
which did not recur during the first quarter of 2010. The amount of collateral liquidation costs
are influenced by the timing and level of effort required for each individual circumstance. It is
doubtful that we will recoup these expenses and have recognized them through our consolidated
results of operations as incurred.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $689,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, with an
effective rate of 43.4%, compared to income tax benefit of $115,000 with an effective rate of 37.3%
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The effective tax rate also includes additional
interest expense, net of federal benefit, accrued on our uncertain tax positions. Interest
expense, net of federal benefit, recognized on these uncertain tax positions was $42,000 and
$33,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Excluding the interest
expense related to the uncertain tax positions, our effective tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 would have been 40.7% and 48.1%, respectively.
Due to our accounting policy to include interest expense related to uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense, our effective tax rate will continue to reflect the interest on
the uncertain positions which will compound each year the positions are outstanding. Therefore, we
believe presenting the effective tax rate excluding the interest expense related to uncertain tax
positions provides greater comparability of the effective tax rates in the periods presented. The
difference in the effective tax rate from 2010 to 2009 primarily reflects the significant
difference in income before income tax expense, and the relationship of tax-exempt income (e.g.
increase in cash surrender value of life insurance) to income before income tax expense before
giving effect to the interest expense related to the uncertain tax positions. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded additional state tax expense of approximately $43,000, net
of federal benefit, associated with an uncertain tax position.
Generally, the provision for income taxes is determined by applying an estimated annual effective
income tax rate to income before income taxes. Typically, the rate is based on the most recent
annualized forecast of pretax income, book versus tax differences and tax credits, if any. If we
determine that a reliable annual effective tax rate cannot be determined, the actual effective tax
rate for the year-to-date period may be used. We re-evaluate the income tax rates each quarter.
Therefore, the current projected effect tax rate for the entire year may change.
26
Financial Condition
General. Our total assets decreased by $15.7 million, or 1.4%, to $1.102 billion at March 31, 2010
from $1.117 billion at December 31, 2009. The decrease in assets is primarily attributable to the
decline in our on-balance sheet liquidity resulting from declines in our core deposit balances,
partially offset by the use of excess liquidity to purchase securities available for sale to
achieve an improvement in our yield on earning assets.
Short-term investments. Short-term investments decreased by $25.1 million to $79.1 million at
March 31, 2010 from $104.2 million at December 31, 2009. We continue to value the safety and
soundness provided by the Federal Reserve Bank, and during this difficult economic environment, we
view on-balance sheet liquidity as a critical element to maintaining adequate liquidity to meet our
cash and collateral obligations and therefore are continuing to keep elevated levels of cash on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. We will, however, utilize excess liquidity to pay down
maturing debt or not replace maturing brokered certificates of deposit or invest in prudent
securities to maintain adequate liquidity at an improved margin.
Securities. Securities available-for-sale increased by $9.6 million, or 7.8% to $131.9 million at
March 31, 2010 from $122.3 million at December 31, 2009, primarily due to additional purchases of
government agency collateralized mortgage obligations. Our available-for-sale investment portfolio
primarily consists of collateralized mortgage obligations and is used to provide a source of
liquidity, including the ability to pledge securities, while maximizing the earnings potential of
our assets. The estimated prepayment streams associated with this portfolio also allow us to
better match our short-term liabilities. We purchase investment securities intended to protect our
net interest margin while maintaining an acceptable risk profile. While collateralized mortgage
obligations present prepayment risk and extension risk, we believe the overall credit risk
associated with these investments is minimal as approximately 98.1% of the obligations we hold were
issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), a government agency. The remaining
1.9% of the collateralized mortgage obligations we hold were issued by government-sponsored
enterprises Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
(FHLMC). We do not hold any FNMA or FHLMC preferred stock. In addition, our credit risk is
further mitigated by the fact that the securities within our portfolio are not collateralized by
subprime mortgages.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized unrealized holding gains of
approximately $423,000 through other comprehensive income. All of the securities we hold have
active trading markets, and we are not currently experiencing difficulties in pricing our
securities. Our portfolio is sensitive to fluctuations in the interest rate environment and has
limited sensitivity to credit risk due to the nature of the issuers of our securities as previously
discussed. If interest rates decline and the credit quality of the
securities remain positive, the market value of our debt securities portfolio should improve. If
interest rates increase and the credit quality of the securities remain positive, the market value
of our debt securities portfolio should decline. No securities within our portfolio were deemed to
be other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2010.
Loans and Leases Receivable. Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease
losses, remained relatively flat at $839.4 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $839.8 million at
December 31, 2009. We principally originate commercial business loans and commercial real estate
loans. The overall mix of the loan and lease portfolio at March 31, 2010 remained generally
consistent with the mix at December 31, 2009, continuing to have a concentration in commercial real
estate mortgage loans at 73.7% of our total loan portfolio. Economic conditions remained weak in
the geographic markets we serve during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the demand for new
loans within our markets has declined. We are competing with other lenders for fewer high quality
loan opportunities which are putting pressure on our ability to grow our loan and lease portfolio
at growth rates we experienced in recent years. We remain committed to our underwriting standards
and continue to seek high quality assets to continue our growth plan.
27
The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of gross loans and leases was 1.79% and
1.65% as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Non-accrual loans and leases as a
percentage of gross loans and leases increased to 3.70% at March 31, 2010 compared to 3.26% at
December 31, 2009. As we continued to receive updated financial information from our borrowers, we
identified additional borrowers that we believe do not have adequate liquidity to make their
payments in accordance with the terms of the contractual arrangements therefore we have considered
these assets impaired and have placed them on non-accrual. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, we recorded charge-offs of approximately $126,000 on identified impaired loans and leases
within our loan and lease portfolio due to declining real estate and equipment values supporting
our loans where the collateral is no longer sufficient to cover the outstanding principal and the
borrowers do not have any other means to repay the obligation. Charge-offs do not appear to be
concentrated in any specific industry or geographic location.
Given continued charge-offs and increased indicators of impairment of loans and leases, we recorded
a $1.3 million provision for loan and lease losses in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Taking into consideration the level of charge-offs recorded and the need for additional specific
reserves on impaired loans with estimated collateral shortfalls, we concluded that an appropriate
allowance for loan and lease losses as of March 31, 2010 is $15.3 million or 1.79% of gross loans
and leases. Refer to the Asset Quality section for more information.
Deposits. As of
March 31, 2010, deposits decreased $19.8 million to $964.5 million from $984.4
million at December 31, 2009. Due to our business banking focus that provides for a larger average
deposit relationship, activity within a few of our client relationships can influence our deposit
ending balances at each measurement period. We continue to focus on gathering local deposits
through a variety of methods including offering competitive rates and targeted treasury management
initiatives. Brokered certificates of deposit continue to be a significant source of our funding
and totaled $473.4 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $470.8 million at December 31, 2009;
however, successful in-market deposit gathering, excess on-balance sheet liquidity and limited loan
growth has allowed us to keep our brokered deposit balances at approximately the same level as
December 31, 2009.
Asset Quality
Non-performing Assets. Non-performing assets consisted of non-accrual loans and leases and
foreclosed properties totaling $33.0 million, or 2.99% of total assets, as of March 31, 2010, an
increase of approximately 11.7% from December 31, 2009. Non-performing assets were $29.5 million,
or 2.64% of total assets, at December 31, 2009. The increase in non-performing assets was the
result of identification of additional credits in which the borrowers are having difficulties
making the required principal and interest payments based upon various economic factors they face
including but not limited to the ability to sell land, inadequate cash flow from the operations of
their businesses, or final determinations by our clients to file bankruptcy. While impaired loans
and leases exhibit weaknesses that inhibit repayment in
compliance with the original note terms, the measurement of impairment may not always result in a
specific reserve included in the allowance for loan and lease losses. As part of underwriting
process as well as our ongoing monitoring efforts, we try to ensure that we have adequate
collateral to protect our interest in the related credits and as a result of this practice a
significant portion of our non-performing loans either do not require additional specific reserves
or a lower level of required specific reserve as the loans are believed to be adequately
collateralized as of the measurement period thus providing for a declining allowance for loan and
lease loss to non-accrual loans and leases ratio. Any shortfalls based upon our collateral
evaluation are then reserved for. We expect the current economic situation to continue for the near
term. As a result, it is likely that we will continue to experience elevated levels of impaired
loans and leases.
28
Our non-accrual loans and leases consisted of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
8,087 |
|
|
$ |
8,482 |
|
Construction and land development |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
1-4 family |
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
3,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total first mortgage loans |
|
|
19,733 |
|
|
|
16,574 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
7,638 |
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
Direct financing leases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Home equity and second mortgage |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
31,618 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
Foreclosed properties and repossessed assets |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
32,951 |
|
|
$ |
29,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing troubled debt restructurings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans and leases
to gross loans and leases |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Total non-performing assets to
total assets |
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
to gross loans and leases |
|
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
non-accrual loans and leases |
|
|
48.52 |
|
|
|
50.76 |
|
A rollforward of our current period non-accrual loan activity is as follows (In thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,825 |
|
Loans transferred into non-accrual status |
|
|
7,340 |
|
Loans returned to accrual status |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
Loans transferred to foreclosed properties |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Loans charged-off |
|
|
(126 |
) |
Loans fully paid-off |
|
|
(211 |
) |
Principal payments applied to non-accrual loans |
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
31,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
29
The following represents information regarding our impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
|
the Three |
|
|
the Year |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Impaired loans and leases with no impairment reserves required |
|
$ |
11,160 |
|
|
$ |
13,243 |
|
Impaired loans and leases with impairment reserves required |
|
|
20,458 |
|
|
|
14,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
|
31,618 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment reserve (included in allowance for loan and lease
losses) |
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
28,504 |
|
|
$ |
25,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
26,708 |
|
|
$ |
20,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foregone interest income attributable to impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans and leases |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foregone interest income on impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foregone interest income on impaired loans and leases for the three months ended March 31, 2009
was $337,000.
When we believe that we will not recover our principal on a loan or lease, we record a charge-off
for the amount deemed to be uncollectible. The charge-off is recorded through our allowance for
loan and lease losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net charge-offs of
approximately $126,000 as compared to recording net charge-offs of approximately $1.1 million for
the three months ending March 31, 2009. We continue to proactively monitor our loan and lease
portfolio for further deterioration and apply our prescribed allowance for loan and lease loss
reserve methodology. We believe that our allowance for loan and lease loss reserve was recorded at
the appropriate value at March 31, 2010; however, given ongoing complexities with legal actions on
certain of our large impaired loans and the lack of significant improvement in economic conditions,
further charge-offs and increased provisions for loan losses could be recorded if additional facts
and circumstances lead us to a different conclusion.
30
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,124 |
|
|
$ |
11,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate and
other mortgage |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
Direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and second mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate and other mortgage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financial leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and second mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of period |
|
$ |
15,342 |
|
|
$ |
12,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, the Banks did
not make any dividend payments to the Corporation. The Banks are subject to certain regulatory
limitations regarding their ability to pay dividends to the Corporation. Management believes that
the Corporation will not be adversely affected by these dividend limitations. The Corporations
principal liquidity requirements at March 31, 2010 are the repayment of interest payments due on
subordinated and junior subordinated notes. The Corporation expects to meet its liquidity needs
through existing cash on hand, established cash flow sources such as payments from subsidiaries for
services provided, its line of credit in the amount of $10.5 million of which $10,000 is
outstanding on March 31, 2010 and through any future dividends received from the Banks. The
Corporation and its subsidiaries continue to have a strong capital base and the Corporations
regulatory capital ratios continue to be above the defined minimum regulatory ratios.
We manage our liquidity to ensure that funds are available to each of our Banks to satisfy the cash
flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to ensure the Corporations own cash requirements
are met. The Banks maintain liquidity by obtaining funds from several sources, including principal
and interest payments on loans receivable and mortgage-related securities, deposits and other
borrowings such as federal funds and FHLB advances. The scheduled payments of loans and
mortgage-related securities are generally a predictable source of funds. Deposit flows and loan
prepayments, however, are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and
competition.
31
We had $473.4 million of outstanding brokered deposits at March 31, 2010, compared to $470.8
million of brokered deposits as of December 31, 2009. We are committed to our continued efforts to
raise in-market deposits and reduce our overall dependence on brokered certificates of deposit.
However, brokered
deposits are an efficient source of funding for the Banks and allow them to gather funds across a
larger geographic base at price levels and maturities that are more attractive than single service
deposits when required to raise a similar level of deposits within a short time period. Access to
such deposits allows us the flexibility to decline pursuing single service deposit relationships in
markets that have experienced unfavorable pricing levels. In addition, the administrative costs
associated with brokered deposits are considerably lower than those that would be incurred to
administer a similar level of local deposits with a similar maturity structure. Our local market
deposits have increased but remain volatile, and we expect local deposits to continue to increase
as we establish new client relationships and further marketing efforts aimed at increasing the
balances in existing clients deposit accounts. Nonetheless, we will likely continue to use
brokered deposits to compensate for shortfalls in deposit gathering in maturity periods needed to
effectively match the interest rate sensitivity measured through our defined asset/liability
management process. In order to provide for ongoing liquidity and funding, all of our brokered
deposits are certificates of deposit that do not allow for withdrawal at the option of the
depositor before the stated maturity.
The Banks have been able to access the brokered certificate of deposit market as needed at rates
and terms comparable to market standards. In the event that there is a disruption in the
availability of brokered deposits at maturity, the Banks have managed the maturity structure so
that at least 120 days of maturities could be funded through borrowings with the Federal Home Loan
Bank or Federal Reserve Discount Window utilizing currently unencumbered securities as collateral.
We believe the Banks will also have access to the unused federal funds lines, cash flows from
borrower repayments, and cash flows from security maturities and have the ability to raise local
market deposits by offering attractive rates to generate the level required to fulfill the
liquidity need.
The Banks are required by federal regulation to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure safe and
sound operations. We believe that the Banks have sufficient liquidity to match the balance of net
withdrawable deposits and short-term borrowings in light of present economic conditions and deposit
flows.
Under Federal law and regulation, the Corporation and the Banks are required to meet certain Tier 1
and risk-based capital requirements. Tier 1 capital generally consists of stockholders equity
plus certain qualifying debentures and other specified items less intangible assets such as
goodwill. Risk-based capital requirements presently address credit risk related to both recorded
and off-balance sheet commitments and obligations.
As of March 31, 2010, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
and the State of Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions categorized the Banks as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
In addition, the Banks exceeded the minimum net worth requirement of 6.0% required by the State of
Wisconsin at December 31, 2009, the latest evaluation date.
32
The following table summarizes the Corporations and Banks capital ratios and the ratios required
by their federal regulators at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required to be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required for Capital |
|
|
Corrective Action |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
(to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
111,370 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
% |
|
$ |
72,715 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
95,984 |
|
|
|
11.88 |
|
|
|
64,644 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
80,805 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
13,979 |
|
|
|
14.06 |
|
|
|
7,953 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
9,942 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
(to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
60,959 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
% |
|
$ |
36,358 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
85,846 |
|
|
|
10.62 |
|
|
|
32,322 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
48,483 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
12,724 |
|
|
|
12.80 |
|
|
|
3,977 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
5,965 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
60,959 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
$ |
43,588 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
85,846 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
36,986 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
46,232 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
12,724 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
6,571 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
8,213 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required to be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required for Capital |
|
|
Corrective Action |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands) |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
(to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
110,513 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
% |
|
$ |
72,772 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
94,251 |
|
|
|
11.62 |
|
|
|
64,906 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
81,132 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
14,246 |
|
|
|
14.69 |
|
|
|
7,757 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
9,696 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
(to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
60,109 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
% |
|
$ |
36,386 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
84,082 |
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
32,453 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
48,679 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
13,027 |
|
|
|
13.44 |
|
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
5,818 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
60,109 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
$ |
43,485 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
First Business Bank |
|
|
84,082 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
|
|
37,042 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
46,302 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
First Business Bank Milwaukee |
|
|
13,027 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
|
6,406 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
8,007 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
33
Contractual Obligations and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no significant changes to the Corporations contractual obligations and off-balance
arrangements disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We continue to
believe that we have adequate capital and liquidity available from various sources to fund
projected contractual obligations and commitments.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Interest rate risk, or market risk, arises from exposure of our financial position to changes in
interest rates. It is our strategy to reduce the impact of interest rate risk on net interest
margin by maintaining a favorable match between the maturities and repricing dates of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. This strategy is monitored by the Banks
respective Asset/Liability Management Committees, in accordance with policies approved by the
Banks respective Boards of Directors. These committees meet regularly to review the sensitivity
of each Banks assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs and sources,
and pricing and funding strategies.
We use two techniques to measure interest rate risk. The first is simulation of earnings. The
balance sheet is modeled as an ongoing entity whereby future growth, pricing, and funding
assumptions are implemented. These assumptions are modeled under different rate scenarios.
The second measurement technique used is static gap analysis. Gap analysis involves measurement of
the difference in asset and liability repricing on a cumulative basis within a specified time
frame. A positive gap indicates that more interest-earning assets than interest-bearing
liabilities reprice/mature in a time frame and a negative gap indicates the opposite. In addition
to the gap position, other determinants of net interest income are the shape of the yield curve,
general rate levels, reinvestment spreads, balance sheet growth and mix and interest rate spreads.
We manage the structure of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities by adjusting
their mix, yield, maturity and/or repricing characteristics based on market conditions.
The process of asset and liability management requires management to make a number of assumptions
as to when an asset or liability will reprice or mature. Management believes that its assumptions
approximate actual experience and considers them reasonable, although the actual amortization and
repayment of assets and liabilities may vary substantially. Our economic sensitivity to changes in
interest rates at March 31, 2010 has not changed materially since December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 4T. |
|
- Controls and Procedures |
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon
that evaluation, the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,
2010.
There was no change in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
34
Part II. Other Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
- Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are engaged in legal proceedings in the
ordinary course of their respective businesses. Management believes that any liability arising
from any such proceedings currently existing or threatened will not have a material adverse effect
on the Corporations financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
There have been no material changes to risk factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A. to Part I
of the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
- Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(a) None.
(b) None.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 January 31, 2010 |
|
|
691 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177,150 |
|
February 1 February 28, 2010 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,150 |
|
March 1 March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,150 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares in this column represent the 1,165 shares that were surrendered to us to
satisfy income tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted
shares during the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
On November 20, 2007, the Corporation publicly announced a stock repurchase program
whereby the Corporation would repurchase up to approximately $1,000,000 of the
Corporations outstanding stock. As of March 31, 2010, approximately $177,150 remains
available to repurchase the Corporations outstanding stock. There currently is no
expiration date to this stock repurchase program. |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
- Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
- Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
35
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
- Other Information. |
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. paragraph 1350. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
/s/ Corey A. Chambas
|
|
|
Corey A. Chambas |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
/s/ James F. Ropella
|
|
|
James F. Ropella |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
36
FIRST BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Exhibit Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. paragraph 1350 |
37