10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-13079
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
73-0664379 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
One Gaylord Drive
Nashville, Tennessee 37214
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(615) 316-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding as of July 31, 2011 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
48,401,015 shares |
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
INDEX
2
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
236,775 |
|
|
$ |
183,879 |
|
|
$ |
457,513 |
|
|
$ |
398,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
132,746 |
|
|
|
104,746 |
|
|
|
266,624 |
|
|
|
235,301 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
43,048 |
|
|
|
36,288 |
|
|
|
86,126 |
|
|
|
78,190 |
|
Casualty loss |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
31,347 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
31,347 |
|
Preopening costs |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,271 |
|
|
|
25,951 |
|
|
|
58,328 |
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
(20,693 |
) |
|
|
45,926 |
|
|
|
(5,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
|
|
(20,480 |
) |
|
|
(42,186 |
) |
|
|
(40,595 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
13,432 |
|
|
|
(37,744 |
) |
|
|
10,504 |
|
|
|
(38,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
(11,697 |
) |
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
(10,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
8,633 |
|
|
|
(26,047 |
) |
|
|
6,672 |
|
|
|
(27,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
111,363 |
|
|
$ |
124,398 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowance of $660 and $882, respectively |
|
|
48,977 |
|
|
|
31,793 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
47,594 |
|
|
|
48,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
215,018 |
|
|
|
212,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
2,197,076 |
|
|
|
2,201,445 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
143,773 |
|
|
|
142,651 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
12,521 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
49,780 |
|
|
|
51,065 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,616,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,620,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
58,574 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
145,110 |
|
|
|
175,343 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
12,475 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
147,376 |
|
|
|
246,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
1,165,156 |
|
|
|
1,100,641 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
110,238 |
|
|
|
101,140 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
141,290 |
|
|
|
142,200 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, no shares
issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000 shares authorized,
48,397 and 48,144 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
924,553 |
|
|
|
916,359 |
|
Treasury stock of 385 shares, at cost |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
152,280 |
|
|
|
145,600 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(21,167 |
) |
|
|
(28,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,051,551 |
|
|
|
1,029,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,616,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,620,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
Amounts to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Loss on assets damaged in flood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,541 |
|
Loss on disposals of long-lived assets |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
24,560 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
58,328 |
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
Amortization of discount on convertible notes |
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
5,722 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(17,184 |
) |
|
|
1,257 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
Insurance proceeds receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Income tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,323 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(22,580 |
) |
|
|
(7,546 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(4,005 |
) |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities continuing operations |
|
|
39,650 |
|
|
|
46,232 |
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities discontinued operations |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
39,622 |
|
|
|
46,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(61,413 |
) |
|
|
(19,855 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(56,765 |
) |
|
|
(15,704 |
) |
Net cash flows used in investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(56,765 |
) |
|
|
(17,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,965 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
(26,562 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
(26,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,035 |
) |
|
|
3,273 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted, beginning of period |
|
|
124,398 |
|
|
|
180,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted, end of period |
|
$ |
111,363 |
|
|
$ |
183,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gaylord Entertainment
Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) and have been prepared by the Company, without audit,
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the financial information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods have been
included. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for such
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year because of seasonal
and short-term variations.
2. NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require more
detailed disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements,
including the amounts and reasons for the transfers. Level 3 fair value measurements should present
separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this ASU
requires that a reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class
of assets and liabilities, defined as a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the
statement of financial position, as well as disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs
used to measure fair value in either Level 2 or Level 3. The Company adopted the remaining
disclosure requirements of this ASU in the first quarter of 2011, and the adoption did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to clarify
existing guidance and to require more detailed disclosures relating to Level 3 fair value
measurements. In addition, this ASU requires that a reporting entity should provide the hierarchy
classification for items whose fair value is not recorded on the balance sheet but is disclosed in
the footnotes. The Company will adopt this ASU in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect
this adoption to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to allow an
entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and
the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either instance, an entity
is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of
other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount
for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. The amendments in
this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an
item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The Company will adopt this
ASU in the first quarter of 2012 and does not expect this adoption to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
6
3. NASHVILLE FLOOD:
As more fully discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC, on May 3, 2010, Gaylord Opryland, the Grand Ole Opry, certain
of the Companys Nashville-based attractions, and certain of the Companys corporate offices
experienced significant flood damage as a result of the historic flooding of the Cumberland River
(collectively, the Nashville Flood). Substantially all of the affected properties reopened in the
second half of 2010; however, the Company will continue to have various flood-related expenses
during 2011 as it completes the remaining flood-related projects. The Company has segregated all
costs and insurance proceeds related to the Nashville Flood from normal operations and reported
those amounts as casualty loss or preopening costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
Casualty Loss
Casualty loss in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
respective periods was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Site remediation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
Non-capitalized
repairs of
buildings and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Site remediation |
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
Non-capitalized
repairs of
buildings and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
Insurance Proceeds |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Site remediation |
|
$ |
11,924 |
|
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,877 |
|
Impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
30,244 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,541 |
|
Other asset write-offs |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
Non-capitalized repairs of buildings
and equipment |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
Continuing costs during shut-down period |
|
|
15,957 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,780 |
|
Other |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
Insurance proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
61,494 |
|
|
$ |
12,425 |
|
|
$ |
7,428 |
|
|
$ |
(50,000 |
) |
|
$ |
31,347 |
|
|
|
|
All costs directly related to remediating the affected properties are included in casualty
loss. Lost profits from the interruption of the various businesses are not reflected in the above
tables.
7
Preopening Costs
The Company expenses the costs associated with start-up activities and organization costs
associated with its development of hotels and significant attractions as incurred. As a result of
the extensive damage to Gaylord Opryland and the Grand Ole Opry House and the extended period in
which these properties were closed, the Company incurred costs associated with the redevelopment
and reopening of these facilities through the date of reopening. The Company has included all costs
directly related to redeveloping and reopening the affected properties, as well as all continuing
operating costs other than depreciation and amortization incurred from June 10, 2010 (the date at
which the Company determined that the remediation was substantially complete) through the date of
reopening, as preopening costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
During the second quarter of 2010, in a continued effort to focus on its core Gaylord Hotels and
Opry and Attractions businesses, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of its Corporate Magic
business. On June 1, 2010, the Company completed the sale of Corporate Magic through the transfer
of all of its equity interests in Corporate Magic, Inc. in exchange for a note receivable which was
recorded at its fair value of $0.4 million. During the three months and six months ended June 30,
2010, the Company recognized a pretax gain of $0.6 million related to the sale of Corporate Magic,
as well as a permanent tax benefit of $3.2 million related to the sale.
5. INCOME PER SHARE:
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
48,370 |
|
|
|
47,098 |
|
|
|
48,296 |
|
|
|
47,055 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based
compensation |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of convertible notes |
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
assuming dilution |
|
|
50,944 |
|
|
|
47,098 |
|
|
|
51,923 |
|
|
|
47,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, the effect of dilutive stock-based
compensation awards was the equivalent of approximately 569,000 and 484,000 shares, respectively,
of common stock outstanding. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations in the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2010, these incremental shares were excluded from the
computation of dilutive earnings per share for those periods as the effect of their inclusion would
have been anti-dilutive.
The Company had stock-based compensation awards outstanding with respect to approximately 960,000
and 2,012,000 shares of common stock as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, that could
potentially dilute earnings per share in the future but were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as the
effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The Company had stock-based compensation awards outstanding with respect to approximately 955,000
and 2,293,000 shares of common stock as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, that could
potentially dilute earnings per share in the future but were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as the effect of their inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive.
8
As discussed in Note 9, and more fully in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2010, in 2009 the Company issued 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the
Convertible Notes) due 2014. It is the Companys intention to settle the face value of the
Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion/maturity. Any conversion spread associated with the
conversion/maturity of the Convertible Notes may be settled in cash or shares of the Companys
common stock. The effect of potentially issuable shares under this conversion spread for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 was the equivalent of approximately 257,000 shares of common stock
outstanding. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations in the three months ended
June 30, 2010, these incremental shares were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per
share for that period as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
In connection with the issuance of these notes, the Company sold common stock purchase warrants to
counterparties affiliated with the initial purchasers of the Convertible Notes. The initial strike
price of these warrants is $32.70 per share of the Companys common stock and the warrants cover an
aggregate of approximately 13.2 million shares of the Companys common stock, subject to
anti-dilution adjustments. If the average closing price of the Companys stock during a reporting
period exceeds this strike price, these warrants will be dilutive. The warrants may only be settled
in shares of the Companys common stock.
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Comprehensive income (loss) is as follows for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on natural gas
swaps, net of deferred taxes of $(20) and
$105 |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps,
net of deferred taxes of $1,982 and $1,577 |
|
|
3,549 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,150 |
|
|
$ |
(19,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on natural gas swaps, net of deferred taxes of $2 and $0 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of deferred taxes of $3,818 and $2,029 |
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
Other |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
13,602 |
|
|
$ |
(21,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
A rollforward of the amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the fair
value of financial derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, net of taxes, for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Natural Gas |
|
Total |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(7,860 |
) |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,005 |
) |
2011 changes in fair value, net of deferred taxes |
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6,884 |
|
Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(980 |
) |
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
|
7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment of continuing operations at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is recorded
at cost and summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land and land improvements |
|
$ |
221,444 |
|
|
$ |
214,989 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
2,259,109 |
|
|
|
2,241,813 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
510,674 |
|
|
|
482,011 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
48,005 |
|
|
|
51,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,039,232 |
|
|
|
2,990,656 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(842,156 |
) |
|
|
(789,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
2,197,076 |
|
|
$ |
2,201,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. NOTES RECEIVABLE:
In connection with the development of the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord
National), the Company is currently holding two issuances of bonds and receives the debt service
thereon, which is payable from tax increments, hotel taxes and special hotel rental taxes generated
from the development of the Gaylord National. The Company is recording the amortization of discount
on these notes receivable as interest income over the life of the notes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded interest income of $3.2
million on these bonds, which included in each period $3.1 million of interest that accrued on the
bonds and $0.1 million related to amortization of the discount on the bonds.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded interest income of $6.3
million and $6.4 million, respectively, on these bonds, which included in each period $6.2 million
of interest that accrued on the bonds and $0.1 million related to amortization of the discount on
the bonds. The Company received payments of $10.7 million and $11.8 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, relating to these notes receivable.
10
9. DEBT:
The Companys debt and capital lease obligations related to continuing operations at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility, interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 2.50% or
banks base rate plus 0.50%, maturing July 25, 2012 |
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
Convertible Senior Notes, interest at 3.75%, maturing October 1, 2014,
net of unamortized discount of $47,233 and $53,449 |
|
|
312,767 |
|
|
|
306,551 |
|
Senior Notes, interest at 6.75%, maturing November 15, 2014 |
|
|
152,180 |
|
|
|
152,180 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,165,346 |
|
|
|
1,159,215 |
|
Less amounts due within one year |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(58,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,165,156 |
|
|
$ |
1,100,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above decrease in amounts due within one year results from the Convertible Notes meeting a
condition for convertibility as of December 31, 2010, but not as of June 30, 2011. As of June 30,
2011, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants related to its debt.
As further discussed in Note 17, on August 1, 2011, the Company refinanced its $1.0 billion credit
facility.
Convertible Senior Notes
In 2009, the Company issued $360 million of the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are
convertible, under certain circumstances as described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC, at the holders option, into
shares of the Companys common stock, at an initial conversion rate of 36.6972 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial
conversion price of approximately $27.25 per share. The Company may elect, at its option, to
deliver shares of its common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock in
satisfaction of its obligations upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.
Concurrently with the offering of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note
hedge transactions with respect to its common stock (the Purchased Options) with counterparties
affiliated with the initial purchasers of the Convertible Notes, for purposes of reducing the
potential dilutive effect upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. The initial strike price of the
Purchased Options is $27.25 per share of the Companys common stock (the same as the initial
conversion price of the Convertible Notes) and is subject to certain customary adjustments. The
Purchased Options entitle the Company to purchase, subject to anti-dilution adjustments
substantially similar to the Convertible Notes, approximately 13.2 million shares of common stock.
The Company may settle the Purchased Options in shares, cash or a combination of cash and shares,
at the Companys option.
Separately and concurrently with entering into the Purchased Options, the Company also entered into
warrant transactions whereby it sold warrants to each of the hedge counterparties entitling them to
acquire, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, up to approximately 13.2 million shares of common
stock at an initial exercise price of $32.70 per share. The warrants may only be settled in shares
of the Companys common stock.
11
10. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and commodity price risk.
Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with portions of the
Companys variable rate borrowings. Natural gas price swaps are entered into to manage the price
risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the Companys
hotels. The Company designates its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable rate
borrowings and its natural gas price swaps as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of natural
gas and electricity. All of the Companys derivatives are held for hedging purposes. The Company
does not engage in speculative transactions, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for
trading purposes. All of the counterparties to the Companys derivative agreements are financial
institutions with at least investment grade credit ratings.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated
with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings (e.g., in interest expense when the hedged transactions are interest
cash flows associated with variable rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative
instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the
hedged item, or ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized in the statement of operations during the
current period.
The interest rate swap agreement utilized by the Company at June 30, 2011 effectively modified the
Companys exposure to interest rate risk by converting $500.0 million, or 71%, of the Companys
variable rate debt outstanding under the term loan portion of the Companys $1.0 billion credit
facility to a weighted average fixed rate of 3.94% plus the applicable margin on these borrowings,
thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. This agreement
involved the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments through
July 25, 2011, without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The critical terms of the
swap agreements matched the critical terms of the borrowings under the term loan portion of the
$1.0 billion credit facility. Therefore, the Company designated these interest rate swap agreements
as cash flow hedges. As the terms of these derivatives match the terms of the underlying hedged
items, there was no gain (loss) from ineffectiveness recognized in income on derivatives.
The Company has entered into natural gas price swap contracts to manage the price risk associated
with a portion of the Companys forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the
Companys hotels. The objective of the hedge is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated
with the forecasted purchases of these commodities. At June 30, 2011, the Company had 18 variable
to fixed natural gas price swap contracts that mature from July 2011 to December 2011 with an
aggregate notional amount of approximately 515,000 dekatherms. The Company has designated these
natural gas price swap contracts as cash flow hedges. The Company assesses the correlation of the
terms of these derivatives with the terms of the underlying hedged items on a quarterly basis.
During 2010, the Company entered into natural gas price swap contracts to manage the price risk
associated with a portion of the forecasted purchases of natural gas to be used at Gaylord
Opryland. As a result of the Nashville Flood discussed above, the majority of these purchases were
not going to be made while the hotel was closed. During June 2010, the Company terminated the
contracts for that period and recorded the resulting gains in other gains and losses in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2010.
12
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments based upon quotes, with appropriate
adjustments for non-performance risk of the parties to the derivative contracts, at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
12,227 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
12,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the respective periods
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Reclassified from |
|
Derivatives in |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
Cash Flow |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Hedging |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Location of Amount Reclassified from |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
Relationships |
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
5,531 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
Other gains (losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
$ |
4,511 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Reclassified from |
|
Derivatives in |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
Cash Flow |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
Hedging |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
|
Location of Amount Reclassified from |
|
Ended June |
|
|
Ended June |
|
Relationships |
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
30, 2011 |
|
|
30, 2011 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
10,698 |
|
|
$ |
5,598 |
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
Other gains (losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,704 |
|
|
$ |
5,505 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivative |
Designated as |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
Hedging |
|
Location of Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
Instruments |
|
Derivatives |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Natural gas swaps |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
11. STOCK PLANS:
In addition to grants of stock options to its directors and employees, the Companys 2006 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the Plan) permits the award of restricted stock and restricted stock units
(Restricted Stock Awards). The fair value of Restricted Stock Awards is determined based on the
market price of the Companys stock at the date of grant. The Company generally records
compensation expense equal to the fair value of each Restricted Stock Award granted over the
vesting period.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company granted 186,470 Restricted Stock Awards with
time-
13
based vesting and a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $34.02 per award. Additionally,
the Company granted 67,400 Restricted Stock Awards to certain members of its management team which
may vest in 2014. The number of awards that will ultimately vest will be based on Company
performance relative to the annual budgets approved by the Companys board of directors. The
Company will not begin recognizing compensation
cost for these awards until the fourth quarter of 2012 when the 2013 budget is approved and the key
terms and conditions of the awards will be deemed to be established and a grant date will have
occurred.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Restricted Stock Awards of 622,050 and 471,894 shares,
respectively, were outstanding.
The compensation cost that has been charged against pre-tax income for all of the Companys
stock-based compensation plans was $2.5 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4.8 million and $3.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
12. RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION PLANS:
Net periodic pension expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations included the following components for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
2,417 |
|
|
$ |
2,376 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,334 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic pension expense |
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations included the following components for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Amortization of curtailment gain |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. INCOME TAXES:
The Companys effective tax rate as applied to pre-tax income (loss) was 36% and 31% for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Companys increased effective tax rate
during the 2011 period was due primarily to changes in federal and state valuation allowances in
each period.
The Companys effective tax rate as applied to pre-tax income (loss) was 36% and 28% for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act, which became law on March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation
Act of 2010, which became law on March 30, 2010, the Company and other companies that receive a
subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive
a Federal income tax
14
deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with providing the
subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated retiree
health care liabilities and related subsidies were already
reflected in the Companys financial statements, this change required the Company to reduce the
value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial statements during the period the law
was enacted. As a result, the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash tax charge of $0.8 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to reflect the impact of this change. This charge, as
well as changes in the Companys valuation allowances during each period, resulted in the change to
the effective tax rate noted above.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $16.0 million and $19.0 million of
unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, of which $9.0 million would affect the Companys effective
tax rate if recognized. These liabilities are recorded in other long-term liabilities in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company estimates the overall decrease in
unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months will be approximately $14.1 million, mainly due
to the expiration of various statutes of limitations. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
the Company had accrued $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of interest and $0.1 million
of penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
On June 21, 2011, the Company announced its plans to develop a resort and convention hotel in
Aurora, Colorado, located approximately 25 minutes from downtown Denver. The Aurora development,
which is expected to feature 1,500 guest rooms and 400,000 square feet of exhibition and meeting
space, will be located on 85 acres in LNR Property CPI Funds High Point Master Plan Development.
The project is expected to cost approximately $800 million and will be funded by the Company,
potential joint venture partners and the tax incentives that are being provided as a result of an
agreement between the Company and the city of Aurora, and is contingent on receiving required
governmental approvals, incentives, and final approval by the Companys board of directors. The
Company expects to break ground on construction in mid-to-late 2012 and expects the resort to be
open for business in mid-to-late 2015. At this time, the Company has not made any material
financial commitments in connection with this development.
On September 3, 2008, the Company announced it had entered into a land purchase agreement with DMB
Mesa Proving Grounds LLC, an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. (DMB), to create a resort and
convention hotel at the Mesa Proving Grounds in Mesa, Arizona, which is located approximately 30
miles from downtown Phoenix. The DMB development is planned to host an urban environment that
features a Gaylord resort property, a retail development, a golf course, office space, residential
offerings and significant other mixed-use components. The Companys purchase agreement includes the
purchase of 100 acres of real estate within the 3,200-acre Mesa Proving Grounds. The project is
contingent on the finalization of entitlements and incentives, and final approval by the Companys
board of directors. The Company made an initial deposit of a portion of the land purchase price
upon execution of the agreement with DMB, and additional deposit amounts are due upon the
occurrence of various development milestones, including required governmental approvals of the
entitlements and incentives. These deposits are refundable to the Company upon a termination of the
agreement with DMB during a specified due diligence period, except in the event of a breach of the
agreement by the Company. The timing of this development is uncertain, and the Company has not made
any financing plans or, except as described above, made any commitments in connection with the
proposed development.
The Company is considering other potential hotel sites throughout the country. The timing and
extent of any of these development projects is uncertain, and the Company has not made any
commitments, received any government approvals or made any financing plans in connection with these
development projects.
Through joint venture arrangements with two private real estate funds managed by DB Real Estate
Opportunities Group, the Company previously invested in minority ownership interests in two joint
ventures which were formed to own and operate hotels in Hawaii. As part of the joint venture
arrangements, the Company entered into contribution agreements with the majority owners, which
owners had guaranteed certain
15
recourse liabilities under third-party loans to the joint ventures.
The guarantees of the joint venture loans guaranteed each of the subsidiaries obligations under
its third party loans for as long as those loans remain
outstanding (i) in the event of certain types of fraud, breaches of environmental representations
or warranties, or breaches of certain special purpose entity covenants by the subsidiaries, or
(ii) in the event of bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings of the subsidiaries. The Company
agreed that, in the event a majority owner is required to make any payments pursuant to the terms
of these guarantees of joint venture loans, it will contribute to the majority owner an amount
based on its proportional commitment in the applicable joint venture. The Company estimates that
the maximum potential amount for which the Company could be liable under the contribution
agreements is $23.8 million, which represents its pro rata share of the $121.2 million of total
debt that is subject to the guarantees. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not recorded any
liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheet associated with the contribution agreements.
On February 22, 2005, the Company concluded the settlement of litigation with Nashville Hockey Club
Limited Partnership (NHC), which owned the Nashville Predators NHL hockey team. At the closing of
the settlement, NHC redeemed all of the Companys outstanding limited partnership units in the
Predators, and the Naming Rights Agreement between the Company and NHC was terminated. In addition,
pursuant to a Consent Agreement among the Company, the National Hockey League and owners of NHC,
the Companys guaranty described below has been limited as described below.
In connection with the Companys execution of an Agreement of Limited Partnership with NHC on June
25, 1997, the Company, its subsidiary CCK, Inc., Craig Leipold, Helen Johnson-Leipold (Mr.
Leipolds wife) and Samuel C. Johnson (Mr. Leipolds father-in-law) entered into a guaranty
agreement executed in favor of the National Hockey League (NHL). This agreement provides for a
continuing guarantee of the following obligations for as long as either of these obligations
remains outstanding: (i) all obligations under the expansion agreement between NHC and the NHL; and
(ii) all operating expenses of NHC. The maximum potential amount which the Company and CCK,
collectively, could be liable under the guaranty agreement is $15.0 million, although the Company
and CCK would have recourse against the other guarantors if required to make payments under the
guarantee. In connection with the legal settlement with the Nashville Predators consummated on
February 22, 2005, this guaranty has been limited so that the Company is not responsible for any
debt, obligation or liability of NHC that arises from any act, omission or circumstance occurring
after the date of the legal settlement. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not recorded any
liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheet associated with this guarantee.
The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit its exposure to any significant
levels of claims relating to workers compensation, employee medical benefits and general liability
for which it is self-insured.
The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain officers, which provides for
severance payments upon certain events, including certain terminations in connection with a change
of control.
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in certain legal actions and claims on
a variety of matters. It is the opinion of management that such legal actions will not have a
material effect on the results of operations, financial condition or liquidity of the Company.
16
15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company held certain assets and liabilities that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included the Companys derivative instruments
related to interest rates and natural gas prices and investments held in conjunction with the
Companys non-qualified contributory deferred compensation plan.
The Companys interest rate and natural gas derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter swap
contracts, which are not traded on a public exchange. See Note 10 for further information on the
Companys derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company determines the fair values of
these swap contracts based on quotes, with appropriate adjustments for any significant impact of
non-performance risk of the parties to the swap contracts. Therefore, the Company has categorized
these swap contracts as Level 2. The Company has consistently applied these valuation techniques in
all periods presented and believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the
types of derivative contracts it holds.
The investments held by the Company in connection with its deferred compensation plan consist of
mutual funds traded in an active market. The Company determined the fair value of these mutual
funds based on the net asset value per unit of the funds or the portfolio, which is based upon
quoted market prices in an active market. Therefore, the Company has categorized these investments
as Level 1. The Company has consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods
presented and believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of
investments it holds.
The Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2011,
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
2011 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Deferred compensation plan investments |
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to fixed natural gas swaps, net |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable to fixed interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of the assets and liabilities held by the Company at June 30, 2011 are not
required to be measured at fair value. The carrying value of certain of these assets and
liabilities do not approximate fair value, as described below.
As further discussed in Note 8, in connection with the development of Gaylord National, the Company
received two notes receivable from Prince Georges County, Maryland which had an aggregate carrying
value of $130.4 million as of June 30, 2011. The aggregate fair value of these notes receivable,
based upon current
17
market interest rates of notes receivable with comparable market ratings and current expectations about
the timing of debt service payments under the notes, was approximately $162 million as of June 30,
2011.
As shown in Note 9, at June 30, 2011, the Company had $700.0 million in borrowings outstanding
under the $1.0 Billion Credit Facility that accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. Because
the margin of 2.50% is fixed, the carrying value of borrowings outstanding do not approximate fair
value. The fair value of the $700.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the $1.0 Billion Credit
Facility, based upon the present value of cash flows discounted at current market interest rates,
was approximately $682 million as of June 30, 2011.
As more fully discussed in Note 9, the Company has outstanding $360.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of Convertible Notes due 2014 that accrue interest at a fixed rate of 3.75%. The
carrying value of these notes on June 30, 2011 was $312.8 million, net of discount. The fair value
of the Convertible Notes, based upon the present value of cash flows discounted at current market
interest rates, was approximately $334 million as of June 30, 2011.
As shown in Note 9, the Company has outstanding $152.2 million in aggregate principal amount of
senior notes due 2014 that accrue interest at a fixed rate of 6.75% (the Senior Notes). The fair
value of these notes, based upon quoted market prices, was $152.9 million as of June 30, 2011.
The carrying amount of short-term financial instruments held by the Company (cash, short-term
investments, trade receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities) approximates fair value
due to the short maturity of those instruments. The concentration of credit risk on trade
receivables is minimized by the large and diverse nature of the Companys customer base.
16. FINANCIAL REPORTING BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS:
The Companys continuing operations are organized into three principal business segments:
|
|
|
Hospitality, which includes the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center, the
Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center, the Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center,
the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland, as
well as the Companys interest in a joint venture; |
|
|
|
|
Opry and Attractions, which includes the Grand Ole Opry, WSM-AM, and the Companys
Nashville-based attractions; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Other, which includes the Companys corporate expenses. |
18
The following information from continuing operations is derived directly from the segments
internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
218,173 |
|
|
$ |
172,920 |
|
|
$ |
427,515 |
|
|
$ |
376,615 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
18,569 |
|
|
|
10,930 |
|
|
|
29,936 |
|
|
|
21,691 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
236,775 |
|
|
$ |
183,879 |
|
|
$ |
457,513 |
|
|
$ |
398,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
25,291 |
|
|
$ |
22,443 |
|
|
$ |
50,566 |
|
|
$ |
45,662 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,271 |
|
|
$ |
25,951 |
|
|
$ |
58,328 |
|
|
$ |
53,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
41,713 |
|
|
$ |
30,009 |
|
|
$ |
71,167 |
|
|
$ |
60,255 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(13,869 |
) |
|
|
(14,133 |
) |
|
|
(27,955 |
) |
|
|
(28,662 |
) |
Casualty loss |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(31,347 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(31,347 |
) |
Preopening costs |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss) |
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
(20,693 |
) |
|
|
45,926 |
|
|
|
(5,740 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
|
|
(20,480 |
) |
|
|
(42,186 |
) |
|
|
(40,595 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations |
|
$ |
13,432 |
|
|
$ |
(37,744 |
) |
|
$ |
10,504 |
|
|
$ |
(38,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
On August 1, 2011, the Company refinanced the $1.0 Billion Credit Facility by entering into a $925
million senior secured credit facility by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the
Company party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent (the $925 Million Credit Facility). The $925 Million Credit Facility
consists of a $525.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, of which $200.0 million was
drawn at closing, and a $400.0 million senior secured term loan facility, which was fully funded at
closing. The $925 Million Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2015 and will initially bear
interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%, subject to adjustment as defined in the agreement.
The purpose of the $925 Million Credit Facility is for working capital, capital expenditures, and
other corporate purposes. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $3.7 million in deferred financing
costs associated with the $1.0 Billion Credit Facility, a portion of which will be written off
during the third quarter of 2011 as a result of the refinancing.
19
18. INFORMATION CONCERNING GUARANTOR AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES:
Not all of the Companys subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys Convertible Notes and the
Senior Notes. The Companys Convertible Notes and Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured
basis by generally all of the Companys significant active domestic subsidiaries (the
Guarantors). Certain discontinued operations and inactive subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) do
not guarantee the Companys Convertible Notes and Senior Notes.
The following condensed consolidating financial information includes certain allocations of
revenues and expenses based on managements best estimates, which are not necessarily indicative of
financial position, results of operations and cash flows that these entities would have achieved on
a stand alone basis.
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
$ |
236,770 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,456 |
) |
|
$ |
236,775 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,746 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
|
38,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,048 |
|
Casualty loss |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
Preopening costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,271 |
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(3,639 |
) |
|
|
34,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(21,447 |
) |
|
|
(30,542 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
30,713 |
|
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
26,247 |
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
(30,713 |
) |
|
|
3,316 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
3,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,432 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(3,290 |
) |
|
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,799 |
) |
Equity in subsidiaries earnings, net |
|
|
7,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
8,637 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
(7,841 |
) |
|
|
8,633 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
$ |
(7,841 |
) |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
|
|
20
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
$ |
183,872 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,675 |
) |
|
$ |
183,879 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,746 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4,366 |
|
|
|
31,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,288 |
|
Casualty loss |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,347 |
|
Preopening costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
24,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,951 |
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(7,655 |
) |
|
|
(13,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,693 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,789 |
) |
|
|
(29,131 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
29,595 |
|
|
|
(20,480 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
24,143 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
(29,595 |
) |
|
|
3,286 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(4,200 |
) |
|
|
(37,112 |
) |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,744 |
) |
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
11,013 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,697 |
|
Equity in subsidiaries losses, net |
|
|
(19,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
(26,099 |
) |
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
(26,047 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,065 |
) |
|
$ |
6,109 |
|
|
$ |
19,956 |
|
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
|
21
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
|
$ |
457,529 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,952 |
) |
|
$ |
457,513 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
266,624 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
8,342 |
|
|
|
77,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,126 |
|
Casualty loss |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468 |
|
Preopening costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
56,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,328 |
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(7,483 |
) |
|
|
53,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,926 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(42,521 |
) |
|
|
(60,526 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
61,061 |
|
|
|
(42,186 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
52,074 |
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
|
|
7,751 |
|
|
|
(61,061 |
) |
|
|
6,489 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,504 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
Equity in subsidiaries earnings, net |
|
|
5,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
6,672 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
4,944 |
|
|
$ |
(5,450 |
) |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
|
|
22
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Revenues |
|
$ |
3,274 |
|
|
$ |
398,395 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,309 |
) |
|
$ |
398,360 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
235,301 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
68,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
78,190 |
|
Casualty loss |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
27,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,347 |
|
Preopening costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
50,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,022 |
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(12,681 |
) |
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,740 |
) |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(41,254 |
) |
|
|
(58,070 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
58,884 |
|
|
|
(40,595 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
48,211 |
|
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
7,358 |
|
|
|
(58,884 |
) |
|
|
6,508 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(4,421 |
) |
|
|
(41,353 |
) |
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,571 |
) |
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
12,485 |
|
|
|
(2,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,722 |
|
Equity in subsidiaries losses, net |
|
|
(20,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(24,570 |
) |
|
|
(28,868 |
) |
|
|
4,660 |
|
|
|
20,929 |
|
|
|
(27,849 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,834 |
) |
|
$ |
7,905 |
|
|
$ |
20,929 |
|
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
|
|
|
23
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
107,310 |
|
|
$ |
4,053 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
111,363 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,977 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
5,086 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4,111 |
|
|
|
43,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
47,594 |
|
Intercompany receivables, net |
|
|
1,768,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,444 |
|
|
|
(2,063,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,881,400 |
|
|
|
101,725 |
|
|
|
295,124 |
|
|
|
(2,063,231 |
) |
|
|
215,018 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
39,623 |
|
|
|
2,157,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197,076 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,773 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
661,272 |
|
|
|
359,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(971,389 |
) |
|
|
49,780 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,592,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,762,848 |
|
|
$ |
295,532 |
|
|
$ |
(3,034,620 |
) |
|
$ |
2,616,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
12,468 |
|
|
|
133,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
145,110 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
Intercompany payables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976,326 |
|
|
|
86,779 |
|
|
|
(2,063,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
14,217 |
|
|
|
2,109,579 |
|
|
|
87,106 |
|
|
|
(2,063,526 |
) |
|
|
147,376 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
1,164,947 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165,156 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(21,559 |
) |
|
|
132,026 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,238 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
58,152 |
|
|
|
82,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
141,290 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
484 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
924,553 |
|
|
|
1,081,063 |
|
|
|
(40,127 |
) |
|
|
(1,040,936 |
) |
|
|
924,553 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
477,274 |
|
|
|
(645,260 |
) |
|
|
248,330 |
|
|
|
71,936 |
|
|
|
152,280 |
|
Other stockholders equity |
|
|
(21,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,167 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,376,545 |
|
|
|
438,191 |
|
|
|
208,204 |
|
|
|
(971,389 |
) |
|
|
1,051,551 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,592,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,762,848 |
|
|
$ |
295,532 |
|
|
$ |
(3,034,620 |
) |
|
$ |
2,616,062 |
|
|
|
|
24
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
117,913 |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
124,398 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,793 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative assets |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
5,748 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,495 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3,364 |
|
|
|
45,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
48,992 |
|
Intercompany receivables, net |
|
|
1,744,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,087 |
|
|
|
(2,031,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,866,806 |
|
|
|
89,780 |
|
|
|
287,767 |
|
|
|
(2,031,503 |
) |
|
|
212,850 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
38,686 |
|
|
|
2,162,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,201,445 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,651 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
12,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,521 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
654,722 |
|
|
|
362,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(965,939 |
) |
|
|
51,065 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,572,735 |
|
|
$ |
2,757,472 |
|
|
$ |
288,168 |
|
|
$ |
(2,997,442 |
) |
|
$ |
2,620,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease
obligations |
|
$ |
58,396 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,574 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
14,622 |
|
|
|
161,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
175,343 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
12,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,475 |
|
Intercompany payables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,947,054 |
|
|
|
84,323 |
|
|
|
(2,031,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
85,493 |
|
|
|
2,108,374 |
|
|
|
84,680 |
|
|
|
(2,031,798 |
) |
|
|
246,749 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of
current portion |
|
|
1,100,335 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,641 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(26,398 |
) |
|
|
127,768 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,140 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
58,559 |
|
|
|
83,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
142,200 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
481 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
916,359 |
|
|
|
1,081,056 |
|
|
|
(40,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,040,936 |
) |
|
|
916,359 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
470,594 |
|
|
|
(645,766 |
) |
|
|
243,386 |
|
|
|
77,386 |
|
|
|
145,600 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(28,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,089 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,354,746 |
|
|
|
437,678 |
|
|
|
203,267 |
|
|
|
(965,939 |
) |
|
|
1,029,752 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,572,735 |
|
|
$ |
2,757,472 |
|
|
$ |
288,168 |
|
|
$ |
(2,997,442 |
) |
|
$ |
2,620,933 |
|
|
|
|
25
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing
operating activities |
|
$ |
(12,553 |
) |
|
$ |
52,137 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,650 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(12,553 |
) |
|
|
52,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
|
(59,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,413 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
continuing operations |
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
(54,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,765 |
) |
Net cash used investing activities discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
(54,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock option and
purchase plans |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities continuing operations |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(10,603 |
) |
|
|
(2,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,035 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
117,913 |
|
|
|
6,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,398 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
107,310 |
|
|
$ |
4,053 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
111,363 |
|
|
|
|
26
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantors |
|
Guarantors |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
26,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,143 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46,232 |
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
26,351 |
|
|
|
19,188 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(18,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,855 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities continuing
operations |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(14,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,704 |
) |
Net cash used investing activities discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(14,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of senior notes |
|
|
(26,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,965 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities continuing
operations |
|
|
(25,290 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,562 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(25,290 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,273 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
175,871 |
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,029 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
175,392 |
|
|
$ |
7,910 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,302 |
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2010, appearing
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on February 25, 2011.
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements intended to qualify for
the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or
current facts. These statements contain words such as may, will, project, might, expect,
believe, anticipate, intend, could, would, estimate, continue or pursue, or the
negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. In particular, they include
statements relating to, among other things, future actions, new projects, strategies, future
performance, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and future financial results.
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about
future events.
We caution the reader that forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that cannot
be predicted or quantified and, consequently, actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but
are not limited to, those factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 or described from time to time in our other reports filed with the SEC. These
include the risks and uncertainties associated with the flood damage to Gaylord Opryland and our
other Nashville-area Gaylord facilities, which include our remaining flood-related repair projects
and effects of the hotel closure including the loss of customer goodwill, uncertainty of future
hotel bookings and other negative factors yet to be determined; economic conditions affecting the
hospitality business generally, rising labor and benefits costs, the timing of any new development
projects, increased costs and other risks associated with building and developing new hotel
facilities, the geographic concentration of our hotel properties, business levels at the Companys
hotels, our ability to successfully operate our hotels, our ability to refinance indebtedness as it
matures and our ability to obtain financing for new developments. Any forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such,
speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overall Outlook
Our concentration in the hospitality industry, and in particular the large group meetings sector of
the hospitality industry, exposes us to certain risks outside of our control. Recessionary
conditions in the national economy have resulted in economic pressures on the hospitality industry
generally, and on our Companys operations and expansion plans. In portions of 2008 and the first
half of 2009, we experienced declines in hotel occupancy, weakness in future bookings by our core
large group customers, lower spending levels by groups, increased cancellation levels, and
increases in groups not fulfilling the minimum number of room nights originally contracted for, or
rooms attrition. In recent quarters, we have begun to see stabilization in our industry and
specifically in our business. We have seen increases in group travel as compared to the 2008 and
2009 levels, as well as growth in outside-the-room revenue, indicating that not only are our group
customers beginning to travel again, they are spending more on food and beverage and entertainment
when they reach our properties. Our attrition and cancellation levels have also decreased compared
to 2009 and 2010 levels. As a result of the higher levels of group business, we have experienced an
increase in occupancy in recent quarters. Although we continue to see pressure on rates for
bookings that will travel in the shorter-term, in 2010 and thus far in 2011, we have experienced
solid booking levels in future periods, as well as improvements in pricing for those bookings. In
conjunction with the improvements in our business, as well as our improved outlook on the
hospitality industry generally, we are revisiting our future plans for growth. While we continue to
focus our marketing efforts on booking rooms in 2011, in addition to later years, there can be no
assurance that we can
28
continue to achieve further improvements in occupancy and revenue levels. We cannot predict when or
if hospitality demand and spending will return to historical levels, but we anticipate that our
future financial results and growth will be harmed if the economy does not continue to improve or
becomes worse.
See Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011, for important information regarding forward-looking
statements made in this report and risks and uncertainties we face.
Nashville Flood
As more fully discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31,
2010 filed with the SEC, on May 3, 2010, the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center
(Gaylord Opryland), the Grand Ole Opry, certain of our Nashville-based attractions, and certain
of our corporate offices experienced significant flood damage as a result of the historic flooding
of the Cumberland River (collectively, the Nashville Flood). Gaylord Opryland reopened November
15, 2010. While the Grand Ole Opry continued its schedule at alternative venues, including our
Ryman Auditorium, the Grand Ole Opry House reopened September 28, 2010. Certain of our
Nashville-based attractions were closed for a period of time, but reopened in June and July 2010,
and the majority of the affected corporate offices reopened during November 2010. Gross total
remediation and rebuilding costs are at the low end of the projected $215-$225 million range,
including approximately $23-$28 million in pre-flood planned enhancement projects at Gaylord
Opryland. In addition, preopening costs came in under the projected $57-$62 million range. These
costs included the initial eight-week carrying period for all labor at the hotel as well as the
labor for security, engineering, horticulture, reservations, sales, accounting and management
during the restoration, as well as the labor associated with re-launching the assets and the
restocking of operating supplies prior to re-opening. In addition, in 2010 we incurred a non-cash
write-off of $45.0 million associated with the impairment of certain assets as a result of
sustained flood damage. While certain flood-related projects remain to be completed in 2011, we
anticipate that net of tax refunds of $36.5 million, insurance proceeds of $50.0 million, and the
cost of projects slated for the property prior to the flood, the net cash impact of the flood in
2010 and 2011 will be approximately $150 million.
In addition, we have initiated an approximate $12 million enhancement to our existing Nashville
flood protection system in an effort to provide 500-year flood protection for Gaylord Opryland, as
well as an approximate $5 million enhancement to provide the same protection for the Grand Ole Opry
House. We have worked with engineers to design the enhancements to be aesthetically pleasing and
sensitive to adjacent property owners. It is anticipated that both projects will be completed by
mid-to-late 2012.
Development Update
On June 21, 2011, we announced our plans to develop a resort and convention hotel in Aurora,
Colorado, located approximately 25 minutes from downtown Denver. The Aurora development, which is
expected to feature 1,500 guest rooms and 400,000 square feet of exhibition and meeting space, will
be located on 85 acres in LNR Property CPI Funds High Point Master Plan Development. The project
is expected to cost approximately $800 million and will be funded by us, potential joint venture
partners and the tax incentives that are being provided as a result of an agreement between us and
the city of Aurora, and is contingent on receiving required governmental approvals, incentives, and
final approval by our board of directors. We expect to break ground on construction in mid-to-late
2012 and expect the resort to be open for business in mid-to-late 2015. At this time, we have not
made any material financial commitments in connection with this development.
Our investments in 2010 and the first half of 2011 consisted primarily of capital expenditures
associated with the flood damage and reopening of Gaylord Opryland and the Grand Ole Opry House, a
new resort pool at Gaylord Texan, and ongoing maintenance capital expenditures for our existing
properties. Our investments in the remainder of 2011 are expected to consist primarily of ongoing
maintenance capital expenditures for our existing properties; a rooms renovation, a new restaurant
and new resort pool at Gaylord Palms; design and
29
architectural plans for our planned resort and convention center in Aurora, Colorado; and
potentially, development or acquisition projects that have not yet been determined.
As described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included herewith, we have entered into a land purchase
agreement with respect to a potential hotel development in Mesa, Arizona.
We are also considering expansions at Gaylord Texan and Gaylord Palms, as well as other potential
hotel sites throughout the country. In addition, we are reevaluating our prior considerations
regarding a possible expansion at Gaylord Opryland. We have made no material financial commitments
to construct expansions of our current facilities or to build new facilities. We are closely
monitoring the condition of the economy and the availability of attractive financing. We are unable
to predict at this time when we might make such commitments or commence construction of these
proposed expansion projects.
Refinancing of our Credit Facility
As further described below in Liquidity and Capital Resources Principal Debt Agreements, on
August 1, 2011, we refinanced our $1.0 billion credit facility by entering into a $925 million
senior secured credit facility.
Our Current Operations
Our ongoing operations are organized into three principal business segments:
|
|
|
Hospitality, consisting of our Gaylord Opryland, our Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention
Center (Gaylord Palms), our Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord Texan),
our Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord National) and our Radisson
Hotel at Opryland (Radisson Hotel), as well as our interest in a joint venture. |
|
|
|
Opry and Attractions, consisting of our Grand Ole Opry assets, WSM-AM and our Nashville
attractions. |
|
|
|
Corporate and Other, consisting of our corporate expenses. |
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, our total revenues were divided
among these business segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Segment |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Hospitality |
|
|
92.2 |
% |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
93.5 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
We generate a significant portion of our revenues from our Hospitality segment. We believe that we
are the only hospitality company whose stated primary focus is on the large group meetings and
conventions sector of the lodging market. Our strategy is to continue this focus by concentrating
on our All-in-One-Place self-contained service offerings and by emphasizing customer rotation
among our convention properties, while also offering additional entertainment opportunities to
guests and target customers.
30
In addition to our group meetings strategy, we are also focused on improving leisure demand in our
hotels through special events (Country Christmas, summer-themed events, etc.), social media
strategies, and unique content and entertainment partnerships. As part of this strategy, on April
27, 2011, we announced a multi-year strategic alliance with DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. to
become the official hotel provider of DreamWorks vacation experiences. Through this strategic
alliance, we will offer leisure experiences featuring DreamWorks characters for our guests at all
of our resort properties beginning in November 2011.
Key Performance Indicators
The operating results of our Hospitality segment are highly dependent on the volume of customers at
our hotels and the quality of the customer mix at our hotels. These factors impact the price we can
charge for our hotel rooms and other amenities, such as food and beverage and meeting space. Key
performance indicators related to revenue are:
|
|
|
hotel occupancy (a volume indicator); |
|
|
|
|
average daily rate (ADR) (a price indicator); |
|
|
|
|
Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) (a summary measure of hotel results calculated by
dividing room sales by room nights available to guests for the period); |
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue per Available Room (Total RevPAR) (a summary measure of hotel results
calculated by dividing the sum of room, food and beverage and other ancillary service
revenue by room nights available to guests for the period); and |
|
|
|
|
Net Definite Room Nights Booked (a volume indicator which represents the total number of
definite bookings for future room nights at Gaylord hotels confirmed during the applicable
period, net of cancellations). |
We recognize Hospitality segment revenue from our occupied hotel rooms as earned on the close of
business each day and from concessions and food and beverage sales at the time of sale. Attrition
fees, which are charged to groups when they do not fulfill the minimum number of room nights or
minimum food and beverage spending requirements originally contracted for, as well as cancellation
fees, are recognized as revenue in the period they are collected. Almost all of our Hospitality
segment revenues are either cash-based or, for meeting and convention groups meeting our credit
criteria, billed and collected on a short-term receivables basis. Our industry is capital
intensive, and we rely on the ability of our hotels to generate operating cash flow to repay debt
financing, fund maintenance capital expenditures and provide excess cash flow for future
development.
The results of operations of our Hospitality segment are affected by the number and type of group
meetings and conventions scheduled to attend our hotels in a given period. We attempt to offset any
identified shortfalls in occupancy by creating special events at our hotels or offering incentives
to groups in order to attract increased business during this period. A variety of factors can
affect the results of any interim period, including the nature and quality of the group meetings
and conventions attending our hotels during such period, which meetings and conventions have often
been contracted for several years in advance, the level of attrition we experience, and the level
of transient business at our hotels during such period.
31
Selected Financial Information
The following table contains our unaudited selected summary financial data for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The table also shows the percentage relationships to total
revenues and, in the case of segment operating income (loss), its relationship to segment revenues
(in thousands, except percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
Unaudited |
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, |
|
Six Months ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
% |
|
2010 |
|
% |
|
2011 |
|
% |
|
2010 |
|
% |
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
218,173 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
$ |
172,920 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
$ |
427,515 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
% |
|
$ |
376,615 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
18,569 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
10,930 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
29,936 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
21,691 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
236,775 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
183,879 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
457,513 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
398,360 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
132,746 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
% |
|
|
104,746 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
266,624 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
235,301 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
43,048 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
36,288 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
86,126 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
78,190 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Casualty loss |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
31,347 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
31,347 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Preopening costs |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
25,291 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
22,443 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
50,566 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
45,662 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,271 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
25,951 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
58,328 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
53,022 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
205,575 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
% |
|
|
204,572 |
|
|
|
111.3 |
% |
|
|
411,587 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
404,100 |
|
|
|
101.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
41,713 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
30,009 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
71,167 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
60,255 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(13,869 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(14,133 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(27,955 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(28,662 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
Casualty loss |
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(31,347 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(31,347 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Preopening costs |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss) |
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
(20,693 |
) |
|
|
-11.3 |
% |
|
|
45,926 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
(5,740 |
) |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(20,480 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(42,186 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(40,595 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(4,799 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
$ |
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
$ |
6,680 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
$ |
(24,570 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These amounts have not been shown as a percentage of segment revenue because the
Corporate and Other segment generates only minimal revenue. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts have not been shown as a percentage of revenue because they have no relationship
to revenue. |
32
Summary Financial Results
Results
The following table summarizes our financial results for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except percentages and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
236,775 |
|
|
$ |
183,879 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
$ |
457,513 |
|
|
$ |
398,360 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
205,575 |
|
|
|
204,572 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
411,587 |
|
|
|
404,100 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
31,200 |
|
|
|
(20,693 |
) |
|
|
250.8 |
% |
|
|
45,926 |
|
|
|
(5,740 |
) |
|
|
900.1 |
% |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
8,637 |
|
|
|
(22,720 |
) |
|
|
138.0 |
% |
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
(24,570 |
) |
|
|
127.2 |
% |
Net income (loss) per share fully diluted |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
|
135.4 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
125.0 |
% |
Total Revenues
The increase in our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same period in 2010, is attributable to an increase in our Hospitality segment revenues of $45.3
million for the 2011 period and an increase in our Opry and Attractions segment revenue of $7.6
million for the 2011 period, as discussed more fully below. The increase in revenues in our
Hospitality segment is attributable to a $52.1 million increase in revenues at Gaylord Opryland
primarily as a result of being closed during a portion of the 2010 period due to the Nashville
Flood, partially offset by a $6.8 million decrease at our other hotel properties. Total Hospitality
revenues in the 2011 period include $2.9 million in attrition and cancellation fee collections, a
$0.5 million increase from the 2010 period.
The increase in our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same
period in 2010, is attributable to an increase in our Hospitality segment revenues of $50.9 million
for the 2011 period and an increase in our Opry and Attractions segment revenue of $8.2 million for
the 2011 period, as discussed more fully below. The increase in revenues in our Hospitality segment
is attributable to a $57.7 million increase in revenues at Gaylord Opryland primarily as a result
of being closed during a portion of the 2010 period due to the Nashville Flood, partially offset by
a $6.8 million decrease at our other hotel properties. Total Hospitality revenues in the 2011
period include $4.5 million in attrition and cancellation fee collections, a $0.9 million decrease
from the 2010 period.
Total Operating Expenses
The increase in our total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared
to the same period in 2010, is primarily due to increases of $34.3 million and $4.8 million at
Gaylord Opryland and our Opry and Attractions segment, respectively, as a result of being closed
during a portion of the 2010 period due to the Nashville Flood, partially offset by the 2010 period
including $31.3 million in net casualty loss and $6.2 million in preopening costs associated with
the Nashville Flood.
The increase in our total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to
the same period in 2010, is primarily due to increases of $40.9 million and $5.3 million at Gaylord
Opryland and our Opry and Attraction segment, respectively, as a result of being closed during a
portion of the 2010 period due to the Nashville Flood, partially offset by the 2010 period
including $31.3 million in net casualty loss and $6.2 million in preopening costs associated with
the Nashville Flood.
33
Net Income (Loss)
Our net income of $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to a net loss
of $22.7 million for the same period in 2010, was due primarily to the increase in our operating
income described above, partially offset by the following factors:
|
|
|
A provision for income taxes of $4.8 million during the 2011 period, as compared to a
benefit for income taxes of $11.7 million in the same period in 2010, described more fully
below. |
|
|
|
A $3.3 million decrease in our income from discontinued operations for the 2011 period,
as compared to the same period in 2010, due primarily to the gain on the sale, and the
related income tax benefit, of our Corporate Magic business in 2010, described more fully
below. |
Our net income of $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to a net loss of
$24.6 million for the same period in 2010, was due primarily to the increase in our operating
income described above, partially offset by the following factors:
|
|
|
A provision for income taxes of $3.8 million during the 2011 period, as compared to a
benefit for income taxes of $10.7 million in the same period in 2010, described more fully
below. |
|
|
|
A $3.3 million decrease in our income from discontinued operations for the 2011 period,
as compared to the same period in 2010, due primarily to the gain on the sale, and the
related income tax benefit, of our Corporate Magic business in 2010, described more fully
below. |
|
|
|
The 2010 period including a $1.3 million net gain on the extinguishment of debt relating
to the repurchase of a portion of our 6.75% senior notes which did not recur in 2011,
described more fully below. |
Factors and Trends Contributing to Operating Performance
The most important factors and trends contributing to our operating performance during the periods
described herein were:
|
|
|
The Nashville Flood during the 2010 periods, specifically, $31.3 million in net casualty
loss and $6.2 million in preopening costs incurred in the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2010, as well as the negative impact of the affected properties being closed and
the cash flow impact of remediation and rebuild costs. |
|
|
|
Increased occupancy levels at Gaylord Opryland (an increase of 3.9 percentage points of
occupancy and 7.2 points of occupancy for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to the period that the hotel was open during the same
periods in 2010), resulting from increased levels of group business during the periods, and
increased outside-the-room spending at Gaylord Opryland (an increase of 24.5% and 20.8% for
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to the
period that the hotel was open during the same periods in 2010), due primarily to increased
banquet spending by group business. These factors resulted in increased RevPAR and
increased Total RevPAR at Gaylord Opryland for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2011, as compared to the period that the hotel was open during the same periods in
2010. |
|
|
|
Decreased occupancy levels at Gaylord National (a decrease of 7.3 percentage points of
occupancy and 6.8 points of occupancy for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2010), primarily due to a decrease
is associations and governmental groups. The decrease in governmental groups is partially
driven by the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. |
34
|
|
|
government budget, as well as reductions in the federal per diem rate. The decrease in
associations and governmental groups also led to decreased outside-the-room spending at
Gaylord National (a decrease of 9.2% and 8.4% for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2011, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2010). |
|
|
|
Decreased attrition and cancellation levels for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, which increased our revenue,
operating income, RevPAR and Total RevPAR. Attrition at our hotels other than Gaylord
Opryland for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 was 12.4% and 11.1% of
bookings, respectively, compared to 12.5% and 11.9%, respectively, for the same periods in
2010. Cancellations at our hotels other than Gaylord Opryland for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2011 decreased 19.7% and 23.4%, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2010. Attrition at Gaylord Opryland for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011, was 6.7% and 3.0% of bookings, respectively, compared to 12.5% and 10.2%,
respectively, for the 2010 periods that the hotel was open. In the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010 Gaylord Opryland experienced approximately 283,000 cancellations
due to the closure of the property. |
Operating Results Detailed Segment Financial Information
Hospitality Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Hospitality segment
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except percentages
and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
Hospitality revenue (1) |
|
$ |
218,173 |
|
|
$ |
172,920 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
$ |
427,515 |
|
|
$ |
376,615 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Hospitality operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
120,350 |
|
|
|
95,649 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
244,115 |
|
|
|
216,621 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
30,818 |
|
|
|
24,819 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
61,666 |
|
|
|
54,077 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,292 |
|
|
|
22,443 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
50,567 |
|
|
|
45,662 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hospitality operating expenses |
|
|
176,460 |
|
|
|
142,911 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
356,348 |
|
|
|
316,360 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality operating income (2) |
|
$ |
41,713 |
|
|
$ |
30,009 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
$ |
71,167 |
|
|
$ |
60,255 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality performance metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
71.5 |
% |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
173.60 |
|
|
$ |
176.44 |
|
|
|
-1.6 |
% |
|
$ |
169.18 |
|
|
$ |
170.64 |
|
|
|
-0.9 |
% |
RevPAR (3) |
|
$ |
127.20 |
|
|
$ |
127.55 |
|
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
|
$ |
120.89 |
|
|
$ |
119.13 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Total RevPAR (4) |
|
$ |
298.84 |
|
|
$ |
306.65 |
|
|
|
-2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
295.76 |
|
|
$ |
291.40 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Net Definite Room Nights Booked (5) |
|
|
271,000 |
|
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
197.8 |
% |
|
|
546,000 |
|
|
|
452,000 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Hospitality results and performance metrics include the results of our Gaylord Hotels and
our Radisson Hotel for all periods presented. Performance metrics for the 2010 periods include
Gaylord Opryland through May 2, 2010, the date the hotel closed due to the Nashville Flood. |
|
(2) |
|
Hospitality operating income does not include the effect of casualty loss and preopening costs.
See the discussion of casualty loss and preopening costs set forth below. |
|
(3) |
|
We calculate Hospitality RevPAR by dividing room sales by room nights available to guests for
the period. Hospitality RevPAR is not comparable to similarly titled measures such as revenues.
Gaylord Opryland room nights available are not included in room nights available to guests while
Gaylord Opryland was closed. |
35
|
|
|
(4) |
|
We calculate Hospitality Total RevPAR by dividing the sum of room sales, food and
beverage, and other ancillary services (which equals Hospitality segment revenue) by room nights
available to guests for the period. Hospitality Total RevPAR is not comparable to similarly titled
measures such as revenues. Gaylord Opryland room nights available are not included in room nights
available to guests while Gaylord Opryland was closed. |
|
(5) |
|
Gaylord Opryland net definite room nights booked for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2010 includes approximately 283,000 cancellations due to the closure of the property. |
The increase in total Hospitality segment revenue in the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, is primarily due to increases of $52.1 million and
$57.7 million, respectively, at Gaylord Opryland primarily as a result of being closed during a
portion of the 2010 periods due to the Nashville Flood, partially offset by revenue decreases of
$6.8 million and $6.8 million, respectively, at our other hotel properties as a result of slightly
decreased occupancy rates and decreased outside-the-room spending during the 2011 periods. Total
Hospitality revenues were also impacted by an increase of $0.5 million and a decrease of $0.9 million in
attrition and cancellation fee collections during the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2010.
The percentage of group versus transient business based on rooms sold for our hospitality segment
for the periods presented was approximately as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Group |
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
|
81.6 |
% |
|
|
82.4 |
% |
|
|
82.2 |
% |
Transient |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
The slight increase in transient business during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared
to the same period in 2010 is primarily the result of a new resort pool at Gaylord Texan, which
opened in May 2011.
Total Hospitality segment operating expenses consist of direct operating costs, selling, general
and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense. The increase in Hospitality
operating expenses in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same
periods in 2010, is primarily attributable to increases of $34.3 and $40.9 million, respectively,
at Gaylord Opryland as a result of being closed during a portion of the 2010 periods as a result of
the Nashville Flood, as well as slight increases at Gaylord Palms and Gaylord Texan, partially
offset by a decrease in operating expenses at Gaylord National, as described below.
Total Hospitality segment operating costs, which consist of direct costs associated with the daily
operations of our hotels (primarily room, food and beverage and convention costs), increased in the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily
as a result of increases of $25.9 million and $29.6 million, respectively, at Gaylord Opryland as a
result of being closed during a portion of the 2010 periods as a result of the Nashville Flood, as
described below.
Total Hospitality segment selling, general and administrative expenses, consisting of
administrative and overhead costs, increased in the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily as a result of increases of $6.0 million
and $6.9 million, respectively, at Gaylord Opryland as a result of being closed during a portion of
the 2010 periods as a result of the Nashville Flood, as described below.
36
Total Hospitality segment depreciation and amortization expense increased in the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily as a result
of an increase at Gaylord Opryland due to the new fixed assets placed in service as part of the
rebuilding after the Nashville Flood.
Property-Level Results. The following presents the property-level financial results of our
Hospitality segment for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Gaylord Opryland Results. The results of Gaylord Opryland for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance
metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
73,064 |
|
|
$ |
20,963 |
|
|
|
248.5 |
% |
|
$ |
133,374 |
|
|
$ |
75,632 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
% |
|
Operating expense data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
38,135 |
|
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
211.5 |
% |
|
|
76,408 |
|
|
|
46,805 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
227.3 |
% |
|
|
16,955 |
|
|
|
10,101 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
75.8 |
% |
|
|
71.9 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
65.0 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
159.83 |
|
|
$ |
150.38 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
$ |
149.17 |
|
|
$ |
145.15 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
121.08 |
|
|
$ |
108.14 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
$ |
107.71 |
|
|
$ |
94.41 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
278.88 |
|
|
$ |
234.89 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
$ |
255.95 |
|
|
$ |
217.11 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gaylord Opryland results and performance do not include the
effect of casualty loss and preopening costs. Performance metrics
for 2010 periods are through May 2, 2010, the date the hotel
closed due to the Nashville Flood. See the discussion of casualty
loss and preopening costs set forth below. |
Total revenue increased at Gaylord Opryland in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011,
as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily as a result of the hotel closing during portions
of the 2010 periods due to the Nashville Flood. During the three months and six months ended June
30, 2011, RevPAR and Total RevPAR increased as compared to the 2010 periods in which the hotel was
open as a result of increased occupancy, primarily corporate groups, and increased ADR. The
increase in corporate groups also led to increases in outside-the-room spending at the hotel, which
drove the hotels increased Total RevPAR during the 2011 periods. The increase in Total RevPAR was
also impacted by higher collection of attrition and cancellation fees.
Operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses increased at Gaylord Opryland in
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, as a
result of the hotel closing during portions of the 2010 periods due to the Nashville Flood.
37
Gaylord Palms Results. The results of Gaylord Palms for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
37,747 |
|
|
$ |
37,837 |
|
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
$ |
83,239 |
|
|
$ |
81,154 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
21,117 |
|
|
|
21,478 |
|
|
|
-1.7 |
% |
|
|
44,849 |
|
|
|
44,584 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
7,448 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
15,881 |
|
|
|
14,561 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
|
72.3 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
76.0 |
% |
|
|
73.2 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
165.32 |
|
|
$ |
162.29 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
165.70 |
|
|
$ |
169.62 |
|
|
|
-2.3 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
122.02 |
|
|
$ |
117.27 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
125.95 |
|
|
$ |
124.21 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
295.02 |
|
|
$ |
295.73 |
|
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
$ |
327.09 |
|
|
$ |
318.89 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Gaylord Palms RevPAR increased in the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same period in 2010, as a result of slight increases in both occupancy and ADR. However, this
increase was offset by a decrease in outside-the-room spending as a result of a shift in mix from corporate to association groups, which led to the slight decrease in
revenue and Total RevPAR for the three month period. The increase in Gaylord Palms revenue and
Total RevPAR in the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, was
primarily due to increased occupancy and outside-the-room spending, largely driven by an increase
in group business during the period, partially offset by a lower ADR, as rates in Orlando remain
under short-term pressure, primarily due to the increase in room supply in the Orlando, Florida
market that has seen slow absorption due to the challenging economic environment. Total RevPAR was
also impacted by lower collection of attrition and cancellation fees during the 2011 periods.
Operating costs remained fairly stable at Gaylord Palms in the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same periods in 2010, primarily due to increased incentive compensation expense and increased sales
and marketing expenses.
38
Gaylord Texan Results. The results of Gaylord Texan for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
45,690 |
|
|
$ |
45,412 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
96,050 |
|
|
$ |
92,283 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
25,103 |
|
|
|
24,346 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
51,349 |
|
|
|
49,378 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Selling, general and |
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
-2.1 |
% |
|
|
12,337 |
|
|
|
12,192 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
76.2 |
% |
|
|
72.1 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
172.15 |
|
|
$ |
165.58 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
180.88 |
|
|
$ |
167.13 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
131.24 |
|
|
$ |
119.31 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
134.38 |
|
|
$ |
121.04 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
332.29 |
|
|
$ |
330.27 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
351.20 |
|
|
$ |
337.43 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
The increase in Gaylord Texan revenue, RevPAR and Total RevPAR in the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, was primarily due to higher
occupancy and ADR during the 2011 periods, driven by an increase in higher-rated transient business due to the impact of the 2011 Super Bowl being held in metropolitan Dallas and the
impact of the new resort pool that opened during May 2011. This increase helped offset a shift in business
mix from higher-rated corporate groups to lower-rated association groups. The increases in revenue and Total
RevPAR were partially offset by lower collection of attrition and cancellation fees during the 2011
periods.
Operating costs at Gaylord Texan increased in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011,
as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily due to increased variable operating costs
associated with the higher occupancy at the hotel. Selling, general and administrative expenses
fluctuated only slightly during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to
the same periods in 2010.
39
Gaylord National Results. The results of Gaylord National for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
59,914 |
|
|
$ |
66,791 |
|
|
|
-10.3 |
% |
|
$ |
112,268 |
|
|
$ |
124,314 |
|
|
|
-9.7 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
35,040 |
|
|
|
36,743 |
|
|
|
-4.6 |
% |
|
|
69,846 |
|
|
|
74,229 |
|
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
7,687 |
|
|
|
8,094 |
|
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
16,464 |
|
|
|
-5.1 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
75.2 |
% |
|
|
-9.7 |
% |
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
|
72.9 |
% |
|
|
-9.3 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
211.25 |
|
|
$ |
215.83 |
|
|
|
-2.1 |
% |
|
$ |
199.97 |
|
|
$ |
204.61 |
|
|
|
-2.3 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
143.39 |
|
|
$ |
162.38 |
|
|
|
-11.7 |
% |
|
$ |
132.11 |
|
|
$ |
149.15 |
|
|
|
-11.4 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
329.85 |
|
|
$ |
367.72 |
|
|
|
-10.3 |
% |
|
$ |
310.75 |
|
|
$ |
344.10 |
|
|
|
-9.7 |
% |
Gaylord National revenue and Total RevPAR decreased in the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily as a result of lower occupancy
and decreased outside-the-room spending during the 2011 periods, primarily due to a decrease in
associations and governmental groups. The decrease in governmental groups and their associated ADR
was partially driven by the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. government budget, as well as
reductions in the federal per diem rate. The decreases in revenue and Total RevPAR were partially
offset by an increase in collections of attrition and cancellation fees during the 2011 periods.
Operating costs at Gaylord National decreased in the three months and six months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily due to decreased variable operating costs
associated with the decrease in occupancy and outside-the-room revenues. Selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the same periods in 2010, primarily due to a decrease in employment costs and a
decrease in legal and consulting costs associated with the finalization of contract negotiations
with the unions representing certain of our employees in 2010.
40
Opry and Attractions Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Opry and
Attractions segment for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
18,569 |
|
|
$ |
10,930 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
% |
|
$ |
29,936 |
|
|
$ |
21,691 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
9,560 |
|
|
|
6,343 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
% |
|
|
16,829 |
|
|
|
13,460 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (1) |
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
|
279.8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,223 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
1168.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Opry and Attractions segment results do not include the effect of
casualty loss and preopening costs. See the discussion of
casualty loss and preopening costs set forth below. |
The increase in revenues in the Opry and Attractions segment for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010, is primarily due to increases in each
of the businesses that were temporarily closed during 2010 as a result of the Nashville Flood.
The increase in Opry and Attractions operating costs and selling, general and administrative costs
in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010,
was due primarily to the increase in each of the businesses that were temporarily closed during
2010 as a result of the Nashville Flood.
41
Corporate and Other Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Corporate and Other
segment for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
%Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
5,220 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
8,426 |
|
|
|
8,959 |
|
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
|
|
17,247 |
|
|
|
18,556 |
|
|
|
-7.1 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss (1) |
|
$ |
(13,869 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,133 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(27,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,662 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and Other segment results do not include the effect of
casualty loss. See the discussion of casualty loss set forth
below. |
Corporate and Other segment revenue consists of rental income and corporate sponsorships.
Corporate and Other operating costs, which consist primarily of costs associated with information
technology, increased in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same periods in 2010, due primarily to higher employment costs.
Corporate and Other selling, general and administrative expenses, which consist of senior
management salaries and benefits, legal, human resources, accounting, pension and other
administrative costs, decreased in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared
to same periods in 2010, due primarily to lower consulting, pension and incentive compensation
costs in the 2011 periods, which were partially offset by increased equity compensation costs.
Corporate and Other depreciation and amortization expense increased slightly in the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the same periods in 2010, primarily due to an
increase in software placed into service.
42
Operating Results Casualty Loss
As a result of the Nashville Flood discussed above, during the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2011, casualty loss was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opry and |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Attractions |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
Site remediation |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
Non-capitalized repairs of buildings and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opry and |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Attractions |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
Site remediation |
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
Non-capitalized repairs of buildings and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opry and |
|
Corporate |
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
Attractions |
|
and Other |
|
Proceeds |
|
Total |
Site remediation |
|
$ |
11,924 |
|
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,877 |
|
Impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
30,244 |
|
|
|
5,163 |
|
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,541 |
|
Other asset write-offs |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
Non-capitalized repairs of buildings and equipment |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
Continuing costs during shut-down period |
|
|
15,957 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,780 |
|
Other |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
Insurance proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Net casualty loss |
|
$ |
61,494 |
|
|
$ |
12,425 |
|
|
$ |
7,428 |
|
|
$ |
(50,000 |
) |
|
$ |
31,347 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Results Preopening Costs
We expense the costs associated with start-up activities and organization costs as incurred. As a
result of the extensive damage to Gaylord Opryland and the Grand Ole Opry House and the extended
period in which these properties were closed, we incurred costs associated with the reopening of
these facilities through the date of reopening. We have included all costs directly related to
redeveloping and reopening the affected properties, as well as all continuing operating costs other
than depreciation and amortization incurred from June 10, 2010 (the
date at which we determined that the remediation was substantially complete) through the date of
reopening, as preopening costs. During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we
incurred $6.2 million in preopening costs.
43
Non-Operating Results Affecting Net Income (Loss)
General
The following table summarizes the other factors which affected our net income (loss) for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
%Change |
Interest expense, net of
amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
(21,377 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,480 |
) |
|
|
-4.4 |
% |
|
$ |
(42,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,595 |
) |
|
|
-3.9 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
-0.3 |
% |
Income from
unconsolidated companies |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
-20.0 |
% |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
177.8 |
% |
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
195.9 |
% |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
68.8 |
% |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(4,799 |
) |
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
-141.0 |
% |
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
-135.7 |
% |
Income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
-99.9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
-99.8 |
% |
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, increased $0.9 million to $21.4 million (net of
capitalized interest of $0.1 million) during the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to
the same period in 2010, due primarily to an increase in interest expense associated with our $1.0
billion credit facility and an increase in the amortization of the debt discount associated with
our 3.75% convertible notes.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, increased $1.6 million to $42.2 million (net of
capitalized interest of $0.2 million) during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the
same period in 2010, due primarily to an increase in interest expense associated with our $1.0
billion credit facility and an increase in the amortization of the debt discount associated with
our 3.75% convertible notes, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense associated with our
6.75% senior notes as a result of the repurchase of a portion of those notes in the 2010 period.
Cash interest expense increased $0.6 million to $17.0 million in the three months ended June 30,
2011, and increased $0.9 million to $33.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the same periods in 2010. Noncash interest expense, which includes amortization of
deferred financing costs and debt discounts and capitalized interest, increased $0.3 million to
$4.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, and increased $0.7 million to $8.7 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010.
Our weighted average interest rate on our borrowings, excluding the write-off of deferred financing
costs during the period, was 7.0% and 6.8% for the three months and 6.9% and 6.7% for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Income
Interest income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 primarily includes
amounts earned on the notes that were received in connection with the development of Gaylord
National.
44
Income from Unconsolidated Companies
We account for our investment in RHAC Holdings, LLC (the joint venture entity which owns the Aston
Waikiki Beach Hotel) under the equity method of accounting. Income from unconsolidated companies
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of equity method income
from this investment.
Net Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased $2.0 million and $28.5
million, respectively, in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 6.75% senior notes for $1.9
million and $27.0 million, respectively. After adjusting for deferred financing costs and other
costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, as a result of the
repurchases.
Other Gains and (Losses)
Other gains and (losses) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 primarily
consisted of miscellaneous income and expense related to the retirements of fixed assets.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate as applied to pretax income from continuing operations differed from the
statutory federal rate due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
U.S. Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
State taxes (net of federal tax benefit and
change in valuation allowance)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Change in treatment of Medicare Part D subsidies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which became law on March 23, 2010, as
amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which became law on March 30,
2010, the Company and other companies that receive a subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide
retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive a Federal income tax deduction for the
expenses incurred in connection with providing the subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy
received. Because future anticipated retiree health care liabilities and related subsidies were
already reflected in the Companys financial statements, this change required the Company to reduce
the value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial statements during the period the
law was enacted. As a result, the Company recorded a one-time, non-cash tax charge of $0.8 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to reflect the impact of this change. This charge, as
well as changes in the Companys valuation allowances during each period, resulted in the change to
the effective tax rate noted above.
Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
During the second quarter of 2010,
in a continued effort to focus on our core Gaylord Hotels and Opry and Attractions businesses,
we committed to a plan of disposal of our Corporate Magic business. On June 1, 2010, we completed
the sale of Corporate Magic through the transfer of all of our equity interests in Corporate
Magic, Inc. in exchange for a note receivable which was recorded at its fair value of $0.4
million. During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a pretax
gain of $0.6 million related to the sale of Corporate Magic, as well as a permanent tax benefit
of $3.2 million related to the sale.
45
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows From Operating Activities. Cash flow from operating activities is the principal source
of cash used to fund our operating expenses, interest payments on debt, and maintenance capital
expenditures. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our net cash flows provided by operating
activities continuing operations were $39.7 million, reflecting primarily cash provided by our
income from continuing operations before non-cash depreciation expense, amortization expense,
income tax provision, stock-based compensation expense, income from unconsolidated companies, and
losses on the disposals of certain fixed assets of approximately $81.5 million, partially offset by
unfavorable changes in working capital of approximately $41.8 million. The unfavorable changes in
working capital primarily resulted from a decrease in accrued expenses, primarily related to the
payment of accrued compensation, accrued property taxes, and accrued expenses associated with our
hotel holiday programs, and an increase in trade receivables due to a seasonal change in the timing
of payments received from corporate group customers at Gaylord Opryland, Gaylord National and
Gaylord Palms, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenues due to increased receipts of
deposits on advanced bookings of hotel rooms at Gaylord National and Gaylord Opryland.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net cash flows provided by operating activities -
continuing operations were $46.2 million, reflecting primarily our loss from continuing operations
before non-cash depreciation expense, amortization expense, income tax provision, stock-based
compensation expense, income from unconsolidated companies, net gain on extinguishment of debt,
losses on assets damaged in flood, and losses on the sales of certain fixed assets of approximately
$102.0 million, partially offset by unfavorable changes in working capital of approximately $55.8
million. The unfavorable changes in working capital primarily resulted from accruing a $30.0
million insurance recovery receivable related to the Nashville Flood, a $26.3 million increase in
income taxes receivable due to the estimated federal tax refund related to the casualty loss
sustained from the Nashville Flood for income tax purposes, a decrease in deferred revenue at
Gaylord Opryland as a result of the hotel closing on May 2, 2010 due to the Nashville Flood, and a
decrease in accrued expenses primarily related to the payment of accrued property taxes.
Cash Flows From Investing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our primary uses
of funds for investing activities were purchases of property and equipment, which totaled $61.4
million, partially offset by the receipt of a $2.5 million principal payment on the bonds that were
received in April 2008 in connection with the development of Gaylord National and $2.2 million in
proceeds from the sale of certain fixed assets. Our capital expenditures during the six months
ended June 30, 2011 primarily included remaining flood-related projects at Gaylord Opryland, the
building of our new resort pool at Gaylord Texan and various information technology projects, as
well as ongoing maintenance capital expenditures for our existing properties.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our primary uses of funds and investing activities were
purchases of property and equipment, which totaled $19.9 million, partially offset by the receipt
of a $3.8 million principal payment on the bonds that were received in April 2008 in connection
with the development of Gaylord National. Our capital expenditures during the six months ended June
30, 2010 primarily included the rebuilding of Gaylord Opryland and the Grand Ole Opry House, as
well as ongoing maintenance capital expenditures for our existing properties.
Cash Flows From Financing Activities. Our cash flows from financing activities reflect primarily
the incurrence of debt and the repayment of long-term debt. During the six months ended June 30,
2011, our net cash flows provided by financing activities were approximately $4.1 million,
primarily reflecting $4.2 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock option and purchase plans.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net cash flows used in financing activities were
approximately $26.6 million, primarily reflecting the payment of $27.0 million to repurchase
portions of our senior notes.
46
Liquidity
As further described above, we anticipate investing in our operations during 2011 through ongoing
maintenance of our existing hotel properties and a rooms renovation, a new restaurant and new
resort pool at Gaylord Palms. We plan to use our existing cash on hand and cash flow from
operations to fund these expenditures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate potential acquisition
opportunities and future development opportunities for hotel properties and have considered
expanding our existing hotel properties. On June 21, 2011, we announced our plans to develop a
resort and convention hotel in Aurora, Colorado. The project is expected to cost approximately $800
million and will be funded by us, potential joint venture partners and the tax incentives that are
being provided as a result of an agreement between us and the city of Aurora, and is contingent on
receiving required governmental approvals, incentives, and final approval by our board of
directors. We expect to break ground on construction in mid-to-late 2012 and expect the resort to
be open for business in mid-to-late 2015. We anticipate that our 2011 expenditures surrounding the
Aurora development will be limited to design and architectural plans. At this time, we have not
made any material financial commitments in connection with this development.
We will continue to evaluate additional acquisition or development opportunities in light of
economic conditions and other factors. We are unable to predict at this time if or when additional
development or acquisition opportunities may present themselves. In addition, we are unable to
predict at this time when we might make commitments or commence construction related to the
proposed development in Mesa, Arizona or our proposed expansions. Furthermore, we do not anticipate
making significant capital expenditures on the development in Mesa, Arizona or the proposed
expansions of Gaylord Palms and Gaylord Texan during 2011.
As further described below, on
August 1, 2011, we refinanced our $1.0 billion credit facility by
entering into a $925 million credit facility, which matures August 1, 2015.
Principal Debt Agreements
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility. On July 25, 2008, we refinanced our previous $1.0 billion credit
facility by entering into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the $1.0 Billion Credit
Facility) by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, as
guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. The $1.0
Billion Credit Facility consisted of the following components: (a) a $300.0 million senior secured
revolving credit facility, which included a $50.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $30.0
million sublimit for swingline loans, and (b) a $700.0 million senior secured term loan facility.
The term loan facility was fully funded at closing. The revolving loan, letters of credit, and term
loan were to mature on July 25, 2012. At our election, the revolving loans and the term loans
incurred interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% or a base rate (the higher of the lead
banks prime rate and the federal funds rate) plus 0.50%. We entered into interest rate swaps with
respect to $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the term loan portion to
convert the variable rate on those borrowings to a fixed weighted average interest rate of 3.94%
plus the applicable margin on these borrowings during the term of the swap agreements. Interest on
our borrowings was payable quarterly, in arrears, for base rate loans and at the end of each
interest rate period for LIBOR rate-based loans. Principal was payable in full at maturity. We were
required to pay a commitment fee of 0.25% per year of the average unused portion of the $1.0
Billion Credit Facility.
$925 Million Credit Facility. On August 1, 2011, we refinanced the $1.0 Billion Credit Facility by
entering into a $925 million senior secured credit facility by and among the Company, certain
subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent (the $925 Million Credit Facility). The $925 Million
Credit Facility consists of the following components: (a) a $525.0 million senior secured revolving
credit facility, of which $200.0 million was drawn at closing, and includes a $75.0 million letter
of credit sublimit and a $50.0 million sublimit for swingline loans, and (b) a $400.0 million
senior secured term loan facility, which was fully funded at closing. The $925 Million Credit
47
Facility also includes an accordion feature that will allow us to increase the facility by a total
of up to $475.0 million, subject to securing additional commitments from existing lenders or new lending institutions. The $925 Million Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2015 and will
initially bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%, subject to adjustment as defined in
the agreement, payable at the end of each interest rate period. Principal is payable in full at
maturity. We are required to pay a fee of 0.3% to 0.4% per year of the average unused
portion of the $925 Million Credit Facility. The purpose of the $925 Million Credit Facility is for
working capital, capital expenditures, and other corporate purposes.
The $925 Million Credit Facility is (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on the real property
and related personal and intellectual property of our Gaylord Opryland hotel, Gaylord Texan hotel,
Gaylord Palms hotel and Gaylord National hotel, and pledges of equity interests in the entities
that own such properties and (ii) guaranteed by each of the four wholly-owned subsidiaries that own
the four hotels. Advances are subject to a 55% borrowing base, based on the appraisal value of the
hotel properties (reduced to 50% in the event a hotel property is sold).
In addition, the $925 Million Credit Facility contains certain covenants which, among other things,
limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with
affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other
matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The material financial covenants, ratios or
tests contained in the $925 Million Credit Facility are as follows:
|
|
|
We must maintain a consolidated funded indebtedness to total asset value ratio as of the
end of each calendar quarter of not more than 65%. |
|
|
|
|
We must maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of not less than $850.0 million plus
75% of the proceeds received by us or any of our subsidiaries in connection with any equity
issuance. |
|
|
|
|
We must maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the
agreement, of not less than 1.75 to 1.00. |
|
|
|
|
We must maintain an implied debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of adjusted net
operating income to monthly principal and interest that would be required if the
outstanding balance were amortized over 25 years at an assumed fixed rate) of not less than
1.60 to 1.00. |
If an event of default shall occur and be continuing under the $925 Million Credit Facility, the
commitments under the $925 Million Credit Facility may be terminated and the principal amount
outstanding under the $925 Million Credit Facility, together with all accrued unpaid interest and
other amounts owing in respect thereof, may be declared immediately due and payable. The $925
Million Credit Facility is cross-defaulted to our other indebtedness.
As of June 30, 2011, we had $3.7 million in deferred financing costs associated with the $1.0
Billion Credit Facility, a portion of which will be written off during the third quarter of 2011 as
a result of the refinancing.
As of August 1, 2011, $600.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the $925 Million Credit
Facility, and the lending banks had issued $8.0 million of letters of credit under the facility for
us, which left $317.0 million of availability under the credit facility (subject to the
satisfaction of debt incurrence tests under the indentures governing our senior notes).
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes. In 2009, we issued $360 million of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes
(the Convertible Notes). The Convertible Notes have a maturity date of October 1, 2014, and
interest is payable semiannually in cash in arrears on April 1 and October 1, and commenced April
1, 2010. The Convertible Notes are convertible, under certain circumstances as described below, at
the holders option, into shares of our common stock, at an initial conversion rate of 36.6972 shares
of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of
48
the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of
approximately $27.25 per share. We may elect, at our option, to deliver shares of our common stock,
cash or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock in satisfaction of our obligations
upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. We intend to settle the face value of the Convertible
Notes in cash.
The Convertible Notes are convertible under any of the following circumstances: (1) during any
calendar quarter ending after September 30, 2009 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the
closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading
day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds
120% of the applicable conversion price per share of common stock on the last trading day of such
preceding calendar quarter; (2) during the ten business day period after any five consecutive
trading day period in which the Trading Price (as defined in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal
amount of the Convertible Notes, as determined following a request by a Convertible Note holder,
for each day in such five consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of the product of the
last reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable conversion rate, subject to certain
procedures; (3) if specified corporate transactions or events occur; or (4) at any time on or after
July 1, 2014, until the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding October 1, 2014. At June
30, 2011, none of the conditions permitting conversion were satisfied and, thus, the Convertible
Notes are not currently convertible.
The Convertible Notes are general unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equal in right
of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including our 6.75%
senior notes due 2014, and senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated
indebtedness, if any. The Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to any of our secured
indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
The Convertible Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured unsubordinated basis
by generally all of our active domestic subsidiaries. Each guarantee will rank equally in right of
payment with such subsidiary guarantors existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and
senior in right of payment to all future subordinated indebtedness, if any, of such subsidiary
guarantor. The Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries that do not
guarantee the Convertible Notes.
Upon a Fundamental Change (as defined), holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of
their Convertible Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to (but
excluding) the Fundamental Change Repurchase Date (as defined). The Convertible Notes are not
redeemable at our option prior to maturity.
We do not intend to file a registration statement for the resale of the Convertible Notes or any
common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. As a result, holders may only
resell the Convertible Notes or common stock issued upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, if
any, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and
other applicable securities laws.
6.75% Senior Notes. On November 30, 2004, we completed our offering of $225 million in aggregate
principal amount of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 6.75% (the Senior Notes).
The Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2014, bear interest semi-annually in cash in
arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2005. The Senior Notes are
redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2009 at a designated
redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Senior Notes rank equally in right of
payment with our other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all of
our secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The Senior Notes are fully and
unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by generally all of
our active domestic subsidiaries. In addition, the Senior Notes indenture contains certain
covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness (including
additional indebtedness under the term loan portion of our senior secured credit facility),
investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales,
49
capital expenditures, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances
and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The Senior Notes are cross-defaulted
to our other indebtedness.
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased $2.0 million and $28.5
million, respectively, in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding Senior Notes for $1.9
million and $27.0 million, respectively. After adjusting for deferred financing costs and other
costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, as a result of the
repurchases. We used available cash to finance the purchases and intend to consider additional
repurchases of our Senior Notes from time to time depending on market conditions.
Future Developments
As described in Development Update above, we are considering other potential hotel sites
throughout the country, including Aurora, Colorado and Mesa, Arizona.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, we
invested in two unconsolidated entities, one of which owns a hotel located in Hawaii and the other
which formerly owned a hotel located in Hawaii. Our joint venture partner in each of these
unconsolidated entities guaranteed, under certain circumstances, certain loans made to wholly-owned
subsidiaries of each of these entities, and we agreed to contribute to these joint venture partners
our pro rata share of any payments under such guarantees required to be made by such joint venture
partners. In addition, we enter into commitments under letters of credit, primarily for the purpose
of securing our deductible obligations with our workers compensation insurers, and lending banks
under our credit facility had issued $8.0 million of letters of credit as of June 30, 2011 for us.
Except as set forth above, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of June 30, 2011,
including long-term debt and operating and capital lease commitments (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts |
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
Contractual obligations |
|
committed |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
5 years |
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,212,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
512,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital leases |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction commitments |
|
|
48,474 |
|
|
|
48,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
655,853 |
|
|
|
7,331 |
|
|
|
12,578 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
627,246 |
|
Other |
|
|
20,055 |
|
|
|
5,736 |
|
|
|
11,223 |
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations |
|
$ |
1,936,961 |
|
|
$ |
61,731 |
|
|
$ |
724,010 |
|
|
$ |
523,974 |
|
|
$ |
627,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total operating lease commitments of $655.9 million above includes the 75-year
operating lease agreement we entered into during 1999 for 65.3 acres of land located in
Osceola County, Florida where Gaylord Palms is located. |
The cash obligations in the table above do not include future cash obligations for interest
associated with our outstanding long-term debt and capital lease obligations.
Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash payments associated with our
defined benefit pension plan, our non-qualified retirement plan, our non-qualified contributory
deferred compensation plan and our defined benefit postretirement health care and life insurance
plan, we cannot make reasonably certain estimates of the period of cash settlement. Therefore,
these obligations have been excluded from the contractual
50
obligations table above. See Note 12 and
Note 13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further
discussion related to these obligations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Certain of our accounting policies, including those
related to revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, stock-based
compensation, derivative financial instruments, income taxes, retirement and postretirement
benefits other than pension plans, and legal contingencies, require that we apply significant
judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments are based
on our historical experience, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our
customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. There can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ from our estimates. For a discussion of our critical
accounting policies and estimates, please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There were no
newly identified critical accounting policies in the first six months of 2011 nor were there any
material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included
herewith.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposures to
market risk are from changes in interest rates, natural gas prices and equity prices and changes in
asset values of investments that fund our pension plan.
Risk Related to Changes in Interest Rates
Borrowings outstanding under our $925 Million Credit Facility initially bear interest at an annual
rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%, subject to adjustment as defined in the agreement. If LIBOR were to
increase by 100 basis points, our annual interest cost on the $600.0 million in borrowings
outstanding under our $925 Million Credit Facility as of August 1, 2011 would increase by
approximately $6.0 million.
Certain of our outstanding cash balances are occasionally invested overnight with high credit
quality financial institutions. We do not have significant exposure to changing interest rates on
invested cash at June 30, 2011. As a result, the interest rate market risk implicit in these
investments at June 30, 2011, if any, is low.
Risk Related to Changes in Natural Gas Prices
As of June 30, 2011, we held 18 variable to fixed natural gas price swaps with respect to the
purchase of 515,000 dekatherms of natural gas in order to fix the prices at which we purchase that
volume of natural gas for our hotels. These natural gas price swaps, which have remaining terms of
up to six months, effectively adjust the price on that volume of purchases of natural gas to a weighted average price of $4.91 per
dekatherm. These natural gas swaps are deemed effective, and, therefore, the hedges have been
treated as an effective cash flow hedge. If the forward price of natural gas futures contracts for
delivery at the Henry Hub as of June 30, 2011 as quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange was to
increase or decrease by 10%, the net derivative liability associated with the fair value of our
natural gas swaps outstanding as of June 30, 2011 would have decreased or increased by $0.2
million.
51
Risk Related to Changes in Equity Prices
The $360 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes we issued in September 2009 may be
converted prior to maturity, at the holders option, into shares of our common stock under certain
circumstances as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December
31, 2010 filed with the SEC. The initial conversion price is approximately $27.25 per share. Upon
conversion, we may elect, at our option, to deliver shares of our common stock, cash or a
combination of cash and shares of our common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon
conversion of the Convertible Notes. As such, the fair value of the Convertible Notes will
generally increase as our share price increases and decrease as the share price declines.
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge
transactions intended to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in
the event that the market value per share of our common stock, as measured under the Convertible
Notes, at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the Convertible Notes. The
convertible note hedge transactions involved us purchasing from four counterparties options to
purchase approximately 13.2 million shares of our common stock, subject to anti-dilution
adjustments, at a price per share equal to the initial conversion price of the Convertible Notes.
Separately we sold warrants to the same counterparties whereby they have the option to purchase
approximately 13.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $32.70 per share. As a result
of the convertible note hedge transactions and related warrants, the Convertible Notes will not
have a dilutive impact on shares outstanding if the share price of our common stock is below
$32.70. For every $1 increase in the share price of our common stock above $32.70, we will be
required to deliver, upon the exercise of the warrants, the equivalent of $13.2 million in shares
of our common stock (at the relevant share price).
Risk Related to Changes in Asset Values that Fund our Pension Plans
The expected rates of return on the assets that fund our defined benefit pension plan are based on
the asset allocation of the plan and the long-term projected return on those assets, which
represent a diversified mix of equity securities, fixed income securities and cash. As of June 30,
2011, the value of the investments in the pension fund was $68.2 million, and an immediate 10%
decrease in the value of the investments in the fund would have reduced the value of the fund by
approximately $6.8 million.
52
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation
of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Company is a party to certain litigation, as described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements included herein and which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
The following risk factors should be considered in addition to the risk factors set forth in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Our hotel developments, including our potential projects in Mesa, Arizona, and Aurora, Colorado,
are subject to financing, timing, budgeting and other risks.
We intend to develop additional hotel properties and expand existing hotel properties as suitable
opportunities arise, taking into consideration the general economic climate. New project
development has a number of risks, including risks associated with:
|
|
|
construction delays or cost overruns that may increase project costs; |
|
|
|
|
construction defects or noncompliance with construction specifications; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits and
authorizations; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of governmental financing and/or incentives; |
|
|
|
|
other risks of construction described below; |
|
|
|
|
development costs incurred for projects that are not pursued to completion; |
|
|
|
|
so-called acts of God such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods or fires that could
delay the development of a project; |
|
|
|
|
adoption of state or local laws that negatively impact the tourism industry; |
53
|
|
|
risks associated with joint ventures or alliances or other potential transaction
structures we may enter into in connection with development projects; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of capital, which is expected to be unfavorable until
general economic conditions improve in the U.S.; and |
|
|
|
|
governmental restrictions on the nature or size of a project or timing of
completion. |
Our development projects may not be completed on time or within budget.
There are significant risks associated with our future construction projects, which could adversely
affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows from these planned projects.
Our future construction projects, including our planned project in Mesa, Arizona and Aurora,
Colorado, as well as the possible expansions of Gaylord Opryland, Gaylord Palms, and Gaylord Texan,
entail significant risks. Construction activity requires us to obtain qualified contractors and
subcontractors, the availability of which may be uncertain. Construction projects are subject to
cost overruns and delays caused by events outside of our control, such as shortages of materials or
skilled labor, unforeseen engineering, environmental and/or geological problems, work stoppages,
weather interference, unanticipated cost increases and unavailability of construction materials or
equipment. Construction, equipment or staffing problems or difficulties in obtaining any of the
requisite materials, licenses, permits, allocations and authorizations from governmental or
regulatory authorities, construction defects or noncompliance with construction specification,
could increase the total cost, delay, jeopardize or prevent the construction or opening of such
projects or otherwise affect the design and features of Gaylord Opryland, Gaylord Palms, and
Gaylord Texan or other projects. In addition, we will be required to obtain financing for
development projects and to use cash flow from operations for development and construction. We may
seek additional debt or equity financing for development and construction projects, and we may
enter into joint ventures or alliances with one or more third parties. We have no financing plans
for projects, and we do not know if any needed financing will be available on favorable terms.
We will be required to refinance our $925 Million Credit Facility by August 1, 2015, and there is
no assurance that we will be able to refinance it on acceptable terms.
The revolving loan, letters of credit and term loan under our $925 Million Credit Facility mature
on August 1, 2015. Prior to this date, we will be required to refinance this credit facility in
order to finance our ongoing capital needs. Our ability to refinance this credit facility on
acceptable terms will be dependent upon a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the
value of our assets, borrowing restrictions which may be imposed by lenders and conditions in the
credit markets at the time we refinance. The availability of funds for new investments and
improvement of existing hotels depends in large measure on capital markets and liquidity factors
over which we can exert little control. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain
additional financing on acceptable terms.
54
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases of shares of the Companys
common stock made during the three months ended June 30, 2011 by or on behalf of the Company or any
affiliated purchaser, as defined by Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Number of |
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
as Part of |
|
Shares that May |
|
|
Number of |
|
Price |
|
Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs |
April 1 April 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 May 31, 2011 (1) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
$ |
35.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
133 |
|
|
$ |
35.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares withheld from vested restricted stock to satisfy the minimum
withholding requirement for federal and state taxes. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Inapplicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
On August 1, 2011, the Company entered into a $925 million senior secured credit facility, as
described above under Part I, Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Principal Debt Agreements, which
discussion is incorporated herein by reference.
Certain of the lenders under the $925 million senior secured credit facility or their affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, certain commercial banking, financial advisory,
and investment banking services in the ordinary course of business for the Company, its subsidiaries and certain of its affiliates, for which they receive customary fees and commissions.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
See Index to Exhibits following the Signatures page.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
|
|
Date: August 5, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Colin V. Reed
|
|
|
|
Colin V. Reed |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mark Fioravanti
|
|
|
|
Mark Fioravanti |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Rod Connor
|
|
|
|
Rod Connor |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
56
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION |
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (restated for SEC filing
purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended (restated for SEC filing
purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 7, 2009). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Gaylord
Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Colin V. Reed pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Mark Fioravanti pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Colin V. Reed and Mark Fioravanti pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Gaylord Entertainment Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are
deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11
or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to
liability under those sections. |
57