INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
001-32671
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
58-2555670
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
2100 RiverEdge Parkway,
Suite 500, Atlanta,
Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30328
(Zip Code)
|
(770) 857-4700
Registrants telephone number, including area
code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Act during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and
non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by
reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold
as of the last business day of the registrants most
recently completed second fiscal quarter was $9,811,206,389. As
of February 11, 2008, the number of shares of the
registrants Common Stock outstanding was
70,135,975 shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information contained in the registrants Proxy
Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the
registrants fiscal year to which this report relates.
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires:
|
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, we,
us, our, our company and
our business refer to IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures Europe refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary, which, prior to September 3, 2007, operated as
ICE Futures and which, prior to October 25, 2005, operated
as the International Petroleum Exchange, or the IPE.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures U.S. refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary that we acquired on January 12, 2007, and which
prior to our acquisition, operated as the Board of Trade of the
City of New York, Inc., or NYBOT, a member-owned not-for-profit
corporation, and after our acquisition, operated as the Board of
Trade of the City of New York, Inc., or NYBOT, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of IntercontinentalExchange. On September 3,
2007, we renamed NYBOT ICE Futures U.S.. ICE
Clear U.S. refers to ICE Futures U.S.s wholly-owned
clearing subsidiary which previously operated as the New York
Clearing Corporation, or NYCC.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures Canada refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary that we acquired on August 27, 2007 and which
previously operated as the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, Inc, or
the WCE. ICE Clear Canada, refers to ICE Futures
Canadas wholly-owned clearing subsidiary which previously
operated as WCE Clearing Corporation, or WCECC.
|
Due to rounding, figures in tables may not sum exactly.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including the sections entitled Business,
Legal Proceedings and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our present beliefs and assumptions and on information
currently available to us. You can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, could,
would, targets, goal,
expect, intend, plan,
anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict,
potential, continue, or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements
relate to future events or our future financial performance and
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause our actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These
risks and other factors include those set forth in
Item 1(A) under the caption Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements and
other factors that may affect our performance include, but are
not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the business environment in which we
operate and trends in our industry, including increasing
competition;
|
|
|
|
our initiative to establish a European clearing house to clear
our energy futures and cleared OTC business and our ability to
commence operations and transition positions from a third party;
|
|
|
|
our ability to keep pace with rapid technological developments;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our cost estimates and expectations;
|
|
|
|
our belief that cash flows will be sufficient to fund our
working capital needs and capital expenditures, at least through
the end of 2009;
|
|
|
|
our ability, on a timely and cost-effective basis, to increase
the connectivity to our marketplace, expand our market data
business, develop new products and services, and pursue select
strategic acquisitions and alliances, all on a timely,
cost-effective basis;
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain existing market participants and attract
new ones;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights,
including the costs associated with such protection, and our
ability to operate our business without violating the
intellectual property rights of others;
|
|
|
|
the impact of any changes in domestic and foreign regulations or
government policy, including any changes or reviews of
previously issued regulations and policies;
|
|
|
|
potential adverse litigation results; and
|
|
|
|
our belief in our electronic platform and disaster recovery
system technologies, as well as our ability to gain access on a
timely basis to comparable products and services if our key
technology contracts were terminated.
|
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on
which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to
update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which such statement
is made or to reflect the occurrence of an unanticipated event.
New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for
management to predict all factors that may affect our business
and prospects. Further, management cannot assess the impact of
each factor on the business or the extent to which any factor,
or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
General
We are a leading operator of regulated futures exchanges as well
as global over-the-counter, or OTC, markets. Currently, we are
the only marketplace to offer an integrated electronic platform
for
side-by-side
trading of energy products in futures and both cleared and
bilateral OTC markets. Through our widely-distributed electronic
trading platform, our marketplace brings together buyers and
sellers of derivative and physical commodities and financial
contracts and allows our participants to optimize their trading,
risk management and hedging operations. We conduct our OTC
business directly through IntercontinentalExchange as an Exempt
Commercial Market under the Commodity Exchange Act, or CEA. We
conduct our regulated U.K. futures markets through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Europe. ICE Futures Europe
is the largest energy futures exchange outside of North America,
as measured by 2007 traded contract volume, and one of the top
10 commodity exchanges in the world, according to the Futures
Industry Association. We conduct our regulated U.S. futures
markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures
U.S. We conduct our regulated Canadian futures markets
through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Canada. We
completed our acquisition of ICE Futures U.S. on
January 12, 2007 and our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada
on August 27, 2007.
ICE Futures U.S. has a wholly-owned clearing house
subsidiary, ICE Clear U.S. ICE Futures Canada has a
wholly-owned clearing house subsidiary, ICE Clear Canada. Our
clearing houses are designed to ensure the safety and soundness
of our markets. Our clearing houses serve as a counterparty to
every trade becoming the buyer to each seller of a
futures contract and the seller to each buyer. This process
substantially reduces credit risk to our customers.
Our
Business
We operate diverse markets that are globally accessible, promote
price transparency and offer participants the opportunity to
trade a variety of energy, soft agricultural and agricultural
commodities and financial products. Our core products include
contracts based on crude and refined oil products, natural gas
and power, and emissions, as well as sugar, cotton, coffee,
cocoa, canola and orange juice along with foreign exchange and
index products. Our derivative and physical products provide
participants with a means for managing risks associated with
changes in the prices of these commodities, asset allocation,
ensuring physical delivery of
2
select commodity products, speculation and arbitrage. The
majority of our trading volume is financially, or cash settled,
meaning that settlement is made through cash payments based on
the difference between the purchase price of the contract and
the value of the underlying commodity at contract expiration,
rather than through physical delivery of the commodity itself.
We offer futures, options and swaps, which are based on
underlying commodity products, and are listed primarily on our
electronic trading platform. We also offer open-outcry trading
and privately negotiated transactions for certain products.
Trading in futures, options on futures, and OTC products offers
a way to protect against and potentially profit
from price changes in financial instruments and
physical commodities. Futures contracts are standardized
agreements to buy or sell a commodity or financial product at a
specified price in the future. The buyer and seller of a futures
contract agree on a price today for a product to be delivered or
settled and paid for in the future. Each contract specifies the
quantity of the product and the time of delivery or payment. An
option on a futures contract is the right, but not the
obligation, to buy or sell a futures contract at a specified
price on or before a certain expiration date. In the OTC
markets, swap contracts are the primary instrument used to
reduce or gain exposure to price movements related to a
commodity or financial product. Swap contracts are typically
less standardized than futures contracts, and are typically
financially settled against either a futures contract price or
an index price in order to hedge against or gain exposure to
commodity price fluctuations. Our customer base includes
professional traders, financial institutions, institutional and
individual investors, corporations, manufacturers, commodity
producers and refiners, and governmental bodies.
All futures and options contracts are cleared through a central
clearing house. In contrast, we also offer OTC swap contracts
that can be traded on a bilateral basis and certain OTC
contracts that can be traded on a cleared basis. Bilateral
contracts are settled between counterparties, while cleared
contracts are novated to a clearing house, where they are marked
to market and margined daily before final settlement at
expiration. We do not take proprietary trading positions in any
contracts in our markets.
We operate our European, Canadian and OTC markets exclusively on
our electronic platform, and we currently offer ICE Futures
U.S.s markets on both our electronic platform and through
an open-outcry trading floor based in New York City. In December
2007, we announced our intention to end open-outcry trading for
futures contracts at ICE Futures U.S. at the end of
February 2008, although we will continue to offer open-outcry
trading for all options on futures contracts at ICE Futures
U.S. We believe that electronic trading offers substantial
benefits to market participants. In contrast to alternate means
of trade execution, market participants executing trades
electronically on our platform are able to achieve improved
trade execution and cost efficiencies through firm posted prices
and greater speed and market transparency, reduced trading
errors and reduced need for market intermediaries. In addition
to trade execution, our electronic platform offers a
comprehensive suite of trading-related services, including
electronic trade confirmation and access to clearing services.
Through our electronic platform, we facilitate straight-through
processing of trades, with the goal of providing seamless
integration of front-, back-and mid-office trading and risk
management activities.
We operate and manage our business on the basis of three
segments: our futures business segment, our OTC business segment
and our market data business segment. For a discussion of these
segments and related financial disclosure, refer to note 21
to our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
For financial disclosure related to our geographic areas, refer
to note 21 to our consolidated financial statements.
Futures
Marketplaces
ICE Futures Europe operates as a Recognized Investment Exchange
in the United Kingdom, where it is regulated by the United
Kingdom Financial Services Authority, or FSA. ICE Futures Europe
was founded in 1980 as a traditional open-outcry auction market
by a group of leading energy and financial services companies.
Today, ICE Futures Europe operates exclusively as an electronic
exchange. Trades in our energy futures markets may only be
executed in the name of exchange members for the members
own account or their customers account. Our members and
their customers include many of the worlds largest energy
companies and leading financial institutions.
3
ICE Futures U.S. is the leading global futures and options
exchange for trading in a broad array of soft
agricultural commodities, including cocoa, coffee, cotton,
frozen concentrated orange juice, or FCOJ, and sugar. ICE
Futures U.S. also provides trading in futures and options
contracts for a variety of financial products, including its
futures and options contracts based on the U.S. Dollar
Index, or USDX. ICE Futures U.S. operates as a Designated
Contract Market and is regulated by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, or CFTC. Until February 2, 2007, ICE
Futures U.S. operated exclusively as an open-outcry
exchange and provided floor-based trading for all of its
contracts. On that date, ICE Futures U.S. introduced its
core soft commodity contracts for trading on our electronic
platform, and has subsequently also introduced the Russell
index, currency pairs and USDX futures contracts electronically.
ICE Futures U.S. owns its own clearing house, ICE Clear
U.S., which clears and settles contracts traded on, or subject
to, the rules of ICE Futures U.S. ICE Clear U.S. is a
Derivatives Clearing Organization and is regulated by the CFTC.
In 2005, ICE Clear U.S. implemented the Extensible Clearing
System, known as ECS, which is a flexible Internet-based
clearing system. ECS has permitted ICE Clear U.S. to
provide its clearing members with real-time clearing information
and the ability to scale and complete clearing processes more
efficiently.
ICE Futures Canada is Canadas only agricultural futures
and options exchange and North Americas first fully
electronic futures commodity exchange. Based in Winnipeg, ICE
Futures Canada offers futures and options contracts on canola,
domestic feed wheat, and western barley. For over a century ICE
Futures Canada, and its predecessor companies, have operated
regulated futures markets that bring together agricultural
industry participants, traders, and investors to engage in price
discovery, price risk transfer and price dissemination for the
markets. ICE Futures Canada is a recognized commodity futures
exchange under the provisions of The Commodity Futures Act
(Manitoba), or the CFA, and is regulated by the Manitoba
Securities Commission, or MSC.
ICE Futures Canada owns it own clearing house, ICE Clear Canada,
which clears and settles contracts traded on, or subject to, the
rules of ICE Futures Canada. ICE Clear Canada is a recognized
clearing house under the provisions of the CFA and is regulated
by the MSC.
OTC
Marketplace
In our OTC business, we operate over-the-counter energy markets
through our globally distributed electronic platform. We offer
trading in thousands of OTC contracts, covering a broad range of
energy-related products and contract types. These contracts
include derivative contracts as well as contracts that provide
for physical delivery of the underlying commodity, principally
relating to natural gas, power, natural gas liquids, chemicals
and crude and refined oil products. We are able to offer a wide
range of derivative contracts in our OTC markets due to the
availability of various combinations of commodities, product
types, delivery hub locations and terms or
settlement dates for a given contract. In 2007, we acquired
ChemConnect Inc. and Chatham Energy, and as a result, have
expanded our markets to include natural gas liquids, chemicals
and natural gas options contracts. Our OTC market participants
include many of the worlds largest energy companies,
leading financial institutions and proprietary trading firms, as
well as natural gas distribution companies and utilities.
Participants in our OTC markets must qualify as eligible
commercial entities under the CEA.
Market
Data
We offer a variety of market data services for both futures and
OTC markets through our market data subsidiary, ICE Data, which
we established in 2002 to meet the growing demand for objective,
transparent and verifiable energy market data. ICE Data compiles
and repackages market data derived from trading activity on our
platform into information products that are sold to a broad
customer base extending beyond our core trading community.
Since its inception, ICE Data has expanded to provide data
services covering our energy futures and OTC markets, as well as
soft agricultural and agricultural commodities, equity indices
and currency pairs. Market data services for these segments
include publication of daily indices, access to historical price
and other data,
4
view only access to our trading platform, end of day settlements
and pricing data sets, as well as a service that provides
independent validation of participants own valuations for
OTC products.
Global
Clearing Strategy
In April 2007, we announced our intention to establish a
European clearing house, based in London, as part of our
strategic plan to offer clearing services through our
wholly-owned clearing businesses in the U.S., Canada and the
U.K. Currently, our energy futures and cleared OTC businesses
rely on clearing services provided by LCH.Clearnet Ltd., an
independent third party clearing house based in the U.K. We
provide clearing services in the U.S. for all ICE Futures
U.S. contracts through ICE Clear U.S. ICE Clear Canada
is the designated clearing house for all ICE Futures Canada
contracts.
To date, we have executed significant portions of our strategic
plan for ICE Clear Europe. We intend to begin clearing our
energy futures and OTC contracts through ICE Clear Europe in the
third quarter of 2008. We believe that gaining greater control
over this core clearing capability will allow us to introduce
more products and services to the futures and OTC markets for
broker-dealers and for our customers, as well as ensure service
levels meet the standards that we have set within our execution
business. We also believe that this flexibility will allow us to
increase our speed-to-market for new cleared products and to
expand our products further into physically-delivered commodity
products. Finally, it is our objective to provide a clearing
model that benefits customers and clearing firms alike, through
competitive pricing, profit participations and new value-added
services. Longer term, we anticipate that collectively, our
European, Canadian and U.S. clearing houses might partner
to serve our global customer base across the commodities and
financial products marketplace, in an innovative and highly
capital efficient manner. Our clearing strategy is designed to
complement our diverse markets while meeting the risk management
and capital and regulatory requirements of an expanding global
marketplace.
Prior to commencing operations, ICE Clear Europe must be
approved by the FSA as a Recognised Clearing House. We submitted
the final FSA application in the third quarter of 2007, and
assuming that the information provided is satisfactory and the
initial timeline is met, regulatory approval is anticipated in
the first quarter of 2008.
On July 18, 2007, we formally notified LCH.Clearnet of our
intention to terminate our clearing agreements with them and
provided the required one years written notices of
termination of these agreements. The notices of termination
specify that the termination date will be a date agreed to
between the parties, or, in the event that no agreement is
reached between the parties regarding a termination date, will
be the date that is twelve months from the date of notice.
Acquisitions
and Strategic Relationships
Over the past two years, we have made several strategic
acquisitions and developed strategic relationships to expand our
product offering and client base, including our acquisitions of
ICE Futures U.S., Commoditrack Inc., Chemconnect Inc., ICE
Futures Canada, and Chatham Energy. We also acquired the
exclusive rights to the U.S. Russell Index futures
contracts, as well as key natural gas indices from both NGI and
NGX. We also entered into strategic alliances relating to our
electronic platform with Natural Gas Exchange, Inc., and Platts,
among others.
On December 21, 2006, we acquired an 8% equity stake in the
National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange, Ltd., or NCDEX, a
derivatives exchange located in Mumbai, India. NCDEX is
presently privately held. The NCDEX investment was made with the
strategic view of allowing the Company to participate in the
development of exchanges and derivatives markets in India and
potentially elsewhere in Asia, which is a key emerging region in
the exchange sector.
On January 12, 2007, we completed the transaction to
acquire NYBOT, now ICE Futures U.S. The acquisition
provided us with the capability to acquire the technology and
systems to provide clearing, as well as material revenue and
expense synergies, and the diversification and expansion of our
product offering into soft agricultural commodities, foreign
exchange and equity index futures and options on futures
products.
5
On February 28, 2007, we acquired all of the assets of
Commoditrack, Inc., which will enable us to provide our energy
market customers with a real-time risk management program.
On March 5, 2007, we purchased the intellectual property
rights to widely-used OTC natural gas price indices, called NGI
indices, from Intelligence Press, Inc. While Intelligence Press
has retained the rights to collect data, publish newsletters and
charge its customers for such services, we have the exclusive
right to charge and collect fees for those seeking license
arrangements for the NGI indices for use in clearing and
settlement.
On March 27, 2007, we entered into an agreement with
Natural Gas Exchange, Inc., or NGX, to form a technology and
clearing alliance for the North American natural gas and
Canadian power markets. Under the arrangement, the cleared and
bilateral markets for North American physical natural gas and
Canadian electricity operated by NGX and by us will be offered
together through our electronic trading platform. In turn, NGX
will serve as the physical settlement facility for these
products, in a process also referred to as physical clearance.
We will recognize a portion of transaction fee revenues
generated by products traded and cleared under this arrangement.
The NGX products will be listing on our electronic trading
platform beginning in February 2008. We also acquired the
exclusive licensing rights to the benchmark NGX natural gas
indices.
On March 30, 2007, we entered into a license agreement with
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., which operates an energy
information business known as Platts. Platts collects market
information from energy traders and brokers and publishes daily
price information in the form of indices or assessments. Under
the agreement, we jointly collaborated with Platts on the
migration of the Platts assessment processes to the assessment
system developed by us on our electronic trading platform in
certain energy products. With continued adoption of electronic
price assessment, we expect this to generate increased reliance
and trading activity on our platform within the OTC physical oil
markets. Platts is reimbursing us for a portion of the
development costs that are incurred to provide the additional
functionality to the trading platform. The arrangement was
initially introduced on our trading platform in June 2007 and is
being rolled out in phases across Asia, Europe and the U.S.
On June 15, 2007, we entered into an exclusive licensing
agreement with the Frank Russell Company, or Russell, to offer
futures and options on futures contracts based on the full range
of Russells industry-leading benchmark U.S. equity
indexes, including the Russell
1000®
Index, Russell
2000®
Index and Russell
3000®
Index, as well as the related value and growth indexes. After a
termination period for trading on existing exchanges in the
third quarter of 2008, we will for the first time have exclusive
rights, as long as certain trading volumes are maintained, to
list futures contracts based on Russells benchmark
U.S. equity indices. The term of the licensing agreement is
seven years and automatically renews for successive one year
periods unless terminated by either party.
On July 9, 2007, we acquired the trading business assets of
ChemConnect Inc., which operated an electronic marketplace for
trading of OTC natural gas liquids and chemical products,
including propane, ethane, ethylene, propylene and benzene. In
connection with the completion of the acquisition, we
transitioned the trading of the ChemConnect products to our OTC
electronic trading platform.
On August 27, 2007, we acquired The Winnipeg Commodity
Exchange, Inc., now ICE Futures Canada, the leading agricultural
commodity futures and options exchange in Canada, and home to
the worlds leading canola futures contract. The transition
of electronic trading for ICE Futures Canada from the
predecessor platform to our electronic trading platform took
place in December 2007.
On October 1, 2007, we acquired substantially all of the
assets of Chatham Energy Partners, LLC. The new business is
operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary known as Chatham Energy
LLC, or Chatham. Chatham is a leading OTC brokerage firm that
specializes in structuring and facilitating transactions in the
OTC markets for natural gas energy options. The acquisition of
Chatham has enabled the development and growth of our OTC
options business through Chathams brokerage activities and
will support the execution of our strategic plans to develop the
leading electronic marketplace for OTC energy options.
On March 15, 2007, we made a proposal to the board of
directors of CBOT Holdings, Inc., or CBOT, to combine our two
companies in a stock-for-stock transaction. CBOT was at the
time, and during the time of
6
our offer continued to be, a party to a definitive merger
agreement with Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc., or
CME, which permitted CBOT to consider superior transaction
proposals. Ultimately, CBOTs board of directors did not
accept our proposal to merge with CBOT, and accepted an improved
proposal from CME, which resulted in a completed transaction
between CME and CBOT on July 13, 2007.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We have established ourselves as a leading operator of regulated
futures exchanges as well as OTC markets. We believe our key
strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
highly liquid global markets and benchmark contracts;
|
|
|
|
diverse portfolio of products and services;
|
|
|
|
leading electronic derivatives trading platform;
|
|
|
|
integrated access to futures and OTC markets;
|
|
|
|
highly scalable, proven technology infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
strong value proposition, including improved trading execution
and in-house clearing capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
market transparency.
|
Highly
Liquid Global Markets and Benchmark Contracts
Several of our core products serve as global benchmarks for
managing risk relating to exposure to price movements in the
underlying commodities. We operate the leading market for
trading in Brent crude oil futures, as measured by the volume of
contracts traded in 2007, according to the Futures Industry
Association. The ICE Brent Crude futures contract is the leading
benchmark for pricing light, sweet crude oil produced and
consumed outside of the U.S. Similarly, the ICE Gas Oil
futures contract is a leading benchmark for the pricing of a
range of refined oil products outside the United States. We also
operate the worlds second largest market for trading in
West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, crude oil futures, as measured
by the volume of contracts traded in 2007, according to the
Futures Industry Association. The WTI Crude futures contract is
the leading benchmark for pricing light, sweet crude oil
produced and consumed within the U.S. We operate the
leading cleared OTC market for trading in Henry Hub natural gas
contracts. We also list hundreds of other contracts based on
natural gas and electric power hubs, or delivery points, in
North America, as well as certain refined products. We believe
that our introduction and adoption of futures-style clearing for
OTC products has enabled us to build significant liquidity
within the OTC markets we operate, while removing the
counterparty risk that is inherent in the bilateral OTC markets.
Our Sugar No. 11 futures contract serves as the benchmark
for raw sugar, a basic commodity now produced in over 120
countries and consumed by every country in the world. Our Coffee
C and Cotton No. 2 contracts are also
recognized as benchmark contracts. These products have been
synonymous with the two predecessor exchanges that formed ICE
Futures U.S. the Coffee, Sugar & Cocoa
Exchange and the New York Cotton Exchange. We believe that our
existing liquidity and history and that of ICE Futures
U.S.s predecessors in trading these commodity products for
over 100 years has enabled the development of our strong
industry relationships.
7
The following table shows the number and notional value of
commodities futures contracts traded in our most significant
futures markets. The notional value of contracts represents the
aggregate value of the underlying commodities covered by the
contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
59,729
|
|
|
$
|
4,293.2
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
$
|
2,936.2
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,712.5
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures(1)
|
|
|
51,388
|
|
|
|
3,727.2
|
|
|
|
28,673
|
|
|
|
1,919.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
|
|
1,582.8
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
|
|
1,071.6
|
|
|
|
10,972
|
|
|
|
569.1
|
|
Sugar No. 11 futures(2)
|
|
|
20,706
|
|
|
|
289.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Trading commenced on February 3, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Sugar No. 11 futures trades on ICE Futures U.S., which was
acquired on January 12, 2007. |
The following table shows the number and notional value of OTC
commodities contracts traded on our electronic platform in our
most significant OTC markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
157,956
|
|
|
$
|
2,705.6
|
|
|
|
121,047
|
|
|
$
|
2,289.3
|
|
|
|
55,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,300.4
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
394.2
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
284.7
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
165.1
|
|
Global oil and refined products
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
305.9
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
116.3
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
101.6
|
|
Diverse
Portfolio of Products and Services
We have developed and offer our customers a diverse array of
products and a broad range of trade execution, market data and
post-trade and clearing services on a single platform. We have a
history of developing innovative products and services for the
markets we serve, including electronic trade confirmation for
the bilateral OTC markets, independent price validation
services, OTC clearing and customized contract design. Our
markets provide important risk management tools and are
constantly evolving based on changes in market conditions,
market structure and technological advancements. We work closely
with our customers to create products and services that meet
their requirements. These relationships help us to anticipate
and lead industry changes.
Leading
Electronic Derivatives Trading Platform
Our electronic trading platform provides centralized and direct
access to risk management and trade execution for a variety of
energy, soft and agricultural commodities, and financial
products. We operate our energy futures and OTC markets, and our
Canadian agricultural markets, exclusively on our electronic
platform. Our electronic platform has enabled us to attract
significant liquidity from traditional market participants as
well as new market entrants seeking the access, efficiency, and
ease of execution offered by electronic trading. We have
developed a significant global presence with thousands of active
screens at over 1,500 OTC participant firms and over 750 futures
participant firms as of December 31, 2007.
Integrated
Access to Futures and OTC Markets
We believe that our growth has been driven in part by our
ability to uniquely offer qualified market participants
integrated access to both the futures and OTC markets. We
believe that our demonstrated ability
8
to develop technology and launch new products for both the
futures and OTC markets provides us with several competitive
advantages, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Diverse Markets: Our globally accessible
electronic trading platform offers qualified market participants
a single interface to multiple exchanges, covering five unique
product categories, including agricultural, energy, chemicals,
equity index and foreign exchange products, as well as a range
of OTC energy products. By offering trading in multiple markets
and products we provide our participants with maximum
flexibility to implement their trading and risk management
strategies.
|
|
|
|
Multiple Access Options: Our participants
access our electronic marketplace through a variety of means,
including through telecommunications hubs in the U.S., Canada,
Europe and Asia, via the Internet or through dedicated lines. We
offer various front-end trading alternatives, including
proprietary front-end systems, ISVs, our own front-end called
WebICE and brokerage firms. ISVs allow market participants to
access multiple exchanges through a single interface, which is
integrated with the participants risk management systems.
|
|
|
|
Cleared and Bilateral OTC Markets: We were the
first marketplace in North America to introduce cleared OTC
energy contracts. We believe that the introduction of cleared
energy contracts in the OTC markets we operate has increased
market liquidity, transparency and attracted new participants to
our OTC markets by reducing bilateral credit risk and by
improving capital efficiency. Today, qualified OTC participants
can trade bilateral and cleared contracts
side-by-side
on our platform.
|
Highly
Scalable, Proven Technology Infrastructure
Our electronic trading platform provides rapid trade execution
and is, we believe, one of the worlds most flexible,
efficient and secure systems for commodities trading. We have
designed our platform to be highly scalable meaning
that we can expand capacity and add new products and
functionality efficiently at relatively low cost and without
disruption to our markets. For example, we launched
side-by-side
trading of ICE Futures U.S.s benchmark soft agricultural
commodities on our electronic trading platform on
February 2, 2007, just twenty one days after we closed the
acquisition on January 12, 2007. Our platform can also be
adapted for use in other markets, as demonstrated by the
decision of the Chicago Climate Exchange, or CCX, to operate its
emissions markets on our trading platform. We believe that our
commitment to investing in technology to enhance our network
infrastructure, electronic trading platform and post-trade
processes will continue to contribute to the growth and
development of our business.
Strong
Value Proposition, Including Improved Trade Execution and
In-house Clearing Capabilities
We believe that by using our electronic platform, market
participants benefit from price transparency and can achieve
price improvement over alternate means of trade execution.
Electronic trade execution offers time and cost efficiencies by
providing firm posted prices and reducing trade-processing
errors and back office overhead, and allows us to accelerate the
introduction of new products on our platform. The combination of
electronic trade execution across a range of commodities and
derivatives markets and market data services facilitates
automation by our participants in all phases of processing from
front-office to back office, and ranging from trading and risk
management to trade settlement. In addition, in our U.K futures
business, eligible participants who become members may trade
directly in our markets by paying a maximum annual membership
fee of approximately $16,000 per year. In contrast, participants
on many other exchanges are required to purchase a
seat on the exchange before they are eligible to
trade directly on or gain membership in the exchange, the cost
of which is substantial.
ICE Clear U.S. clears and settles contracts traded on, or
subject to, the rules of ICE Futures U.S and ICE Clear Canada
clears and settles contracts traded on, or subject to, the rules
of ICE Futures Canada. With recognized and highly respected
clearing operations, we believe that these clearing houses
assurance of performance to its clearing members substantially
reduces counterparty risk and is a critical component of ICE
Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canadas identity as a
reliable and secure marketplace for global transactions. In
April 2007, we announced plans to establish a European clearing
house, based in London, as part of our
9
strategic plan to transition our clearing services in-house from
a third party clearing house. This clearing house will be known
as ICE Clear Europe.
Market
Transparency
We offer market participants price transparency
meaning a complete view of the depth and breadth of our
markets through our electronic platform. This format
provides equal access and market information to all
participants, as well as an electronic record of all bids,
offers and trades. This is in contrast to the traditional
open-outcry exchanges and voice-brokered markets with less
transparency, speed and access to these markets. All orders
placed on our platform are executed in the order in which they
are received, ensuring that all participants have equal
execution priority. In addition, we believe our transparent
electronic markets assist regulators through increased market
visibility and through the generation and maintenance by our
system of complete and confidential records of all transactions
executed in our markets.
Our
Growth Strategy
The record revenues and trading volume we achieved in 2007
reflect our focus on the implementation and execution of our
long-term growth strategy. We have expanded our core business
organically, developed innovative new products for global
markets, and provided trading-related services more broadly. In
addition, we have completed a number of acquisitions and
alliances to leverage our core strengths and grow our business.
We seek to advance our leadership position in the commodity
derivatives markets by focusing our efforts on the following key
strategies for growth:
|
|
|
|
|
attract new market participants;
|
|
|
|
offer additional markets and services;
|
|
|
|
continue to develop our electronic platform and increase
connectivity;
|
|
|
|
expand our market data and services businesses; and
|
|
|
|
pursue select strategic opportunities.
|
Attract
New Market Participants
In recent years, our customer base has grown and diversified due
to the emergence of new participants in the commodities markets,
the increased use of hedging programs by commercial enterprises,
our expansion into new markets, the increased access to our
markets as a result of electronic trading, and the increased
allocation to the commodities asset class by institutional
investors. New and traditional participants include financial
services companies, such as investment banks, hedge funds,
proprietary trading firms and asset managers, as well as
industrial businesses that are increasingly engaging in hedging,
trading and risk management strategies. We believe that many of
these participants have been attracted to our markets in part
due to the availability of electronic trading and due to the
need to hedge price volatility associated with commodity prices.
We intend to continue to expand our customer base by targeting
these and other new market participants and by offering a
growing range of products and electronic trade execution, as
well as pre-trade and post-trade processing capabilities.
Offer
Additional Markets and Services
We have grown, and intend to continue to grow, as a result of
our ability to leverage the combination of OTC markets, clearing
services and new product development. As we continue to develop
and launch our European clearing house, we will seek additional
markets and services with unmet needs in clearing, settlement
and trade confirmation services, including markets we do not
currently serve. We intend to continue to expand the range of
products we offer, both by commodity type and structure, by
working with customers and potential partners to develop new
OTC, futures and option products that provide relevant risk
management tools. We may also seek to license our platform to
other exchanges for the operation of their market on our
platform, as we have with the Chicago Climate Exchange and the
Natural Gas Exchange.
10
Continue
to Develop our Electronic Platform and Increase
Connectivity
We develop and maintain our own network infrastructure and
electronic trading platform to ensure the delivery of a
leading-edge technology platform. Our participants may access
our electronic platform for trading in our markets through our
proprietary front-end, known as WebICE, via a dedicated line or
the Internet, through our application programming interface, or
API, through one of our telecommunication hubs, through
co-location at our data center, or through the front-end systems
developed by any of 29 ISVs. These represent a substantial
portion of the ISVs that serve the commodities futures markets.
Furthermore, participants in our markets can access our platform
directly through their own proprietary interfaces or through a
number of brokerage firms. We intend to extend our initiatives
in this area by continuing to increase ease of access and
connectivity with our existing and prospective market
participants.
Expand
our Market Data and Services Businesses
We continue to leverage the value of the market data derived
from our trade execution, clearing and confirmation system by
developing enhancements to our existing information services and
creating new market data products. Currently, we publish daily
transaction-based indices for the North American spot natural
gas and power markets based on data collected from trading
activity on our platform. In addition, we sell real-time and
historical futures quotes and other futures market data through
137 data vendors that distribute this information, directly and
through various sub-vendors, to approximately 63,000
subscribers. We believe that the database of information
generated by our platform serves as the single largest
repository of energy market data. As a result of the breadth of
our global data offerings, we believe that we are well
positioned to meet the growing demand for additional energy
market data.
An important revenue source for us is our market data offerings.
We intend to further develop our market data offerings by
integrating proprietary information generated by us into new
market data products designed to meet the requirements of a
greater number of participants. Sophisticated quantitative
approaches to risk management as well as customer time
sensitivity has created new applications, uses and demands for
trading related data and analytics. For example, we acquired
Commoditrack in 2007 to address opportunities for serving the
demand for real-time risk management systems. We intend to
create new value-added services to complement our market data
products, including risk management technology, analytical tools
and other services to assist end users. We believe our market
data business is highly scalable, with limited incremental costs.
Pursue
Select Strategic Opportunities
We intend to continue to explore and pursue acquisition
opportunities to strengthen our competitive position and grow
our company. We may enter into business combination
transactions, make acquisitions or enter into strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or alliances, any of which may be
material. We may enter into these transactions for a variety of
reasons, including to expand our products and services, advance
our technology or take advantage of new developments and
potential changes in the industry.
Our
Products and Services
As a leading operator of global futures and OTC marketplaces, we
seek to provide our participants with centralized and direct
access to the futures and OTC markets for price transparency,
electronic trade execution, clearing services and services that
support their trading and risk management activities. The
primary services we provide are electronic price discovery in
futures markets, trade execution and trade processing in futures
and OTC markets, and the delivery of technology to facilitate
these and other trading and risk management activities. We also
offer a broad range of market data services for the futures and
OTC markets.
11
Regulated
Futures Markets
Regulated
Energy Future Products
We operate regulated markets for energy futures contracts and
options on those contracts through our subsidiary, ICE Futures
Europe. These contracts include the ICE Brent Crude futures
contract, the ICE WTI Crude futures contract, the ICE Gas Oil
futures contract, the ICE ECX CFI futures contract, the ICE UK
Natural Gas futures contract, the ICE UK Electricity futures
contract, the ICE Unleaded Gasoline Blendstock (RBOB) futures
contract, the ICE Heating Oil futures contract and options based
on the ICE Brent Crude, ICE WTI Crude, ICE ECX CFI and ICE Gas
Oil futures contracts. The ICE Brent Crude futures contract is
based on forward delivery of the Brent light, sweet grade of
crude oil that originates from the North Sea. Brent crude is a
leading benchmark used to price a range of traded oil products,
including approximately two-thirds of the worlds oil. The
ICE WTI Crude futures contract is a cash-settled futures
contract based on WTI, also a light, sweet crude. The ICE Gas
Oil futures contract is a European heating oil contract and
serves as a significant pricing benchmark for refined oil
products particularly in Europe and Asia.
Our futures markets are fully regulated. As a Recognized
Investment Exchange, ICE Futures Europe is responsible for
carrying out certain regulatory and surveillance functions. ICE
Futures Europe has its own regulatory, compliance and market
supervision functions, as well as a framework for disciplining
market participants who do not comply with exchange rules. Any
information that ICE Futures Europe obtains in its regulatory
capacity is confidential and accessible only by a select group
of compliance and surveillance staff within ICE Futures Europe.
We offer trading in each of our energy futures products
exclusively in our electronic markets. We provide access to
trading our oil contracts and related options continuously for
24 hours, from 11:00 p.m. on Sunday through to
11:00 p.m. on Mondays, and then for 22 hours (from
1:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.) Tuesday through Friday (GMT).
In our other energy futures contracts and related options and in
our emissions futures contracts, we provide electronic market
access for 10 hours on business days (from 7:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday (GMT).
Electronic trading of our energy futures products is available
to members and their customers. ICE Futures Europe members may
access our trading platform directly via the Internet, through
private telecommunication lines, through co-location at our
primary data center, through an independent software vendor or
through a members own front-end system. Customers of our
members may obtain order-routing access to our markets through
members. Once trades are executed on our platform, they are
matched and forwarded to a trade registration system that routes
them to LCH.Clearnet, our current third party clearing services
provider, for clearing and settlement. Electronic trading allows
participants to execute directly on our platform, when
traditionally such orders were delivered via telephone.
We have taken a number of steps to increase the accessibility
and connectivity of our electronic platform, including opening
our electronic platform to ISVs and allowing members to develop
their own conformed front-end systems. Our participants can
currently access our platform using 29 ISVs. We do not depend on
the services of any one independent software vendor for access
to a significant portion of our participant base.
We also have made a number of enhancements to our technology
infrastructure and electronic platform to facilitate trading in
futures contracts. Those enhancements include increased speed,
reliability and additional features, such as stop-limits and
extensive implied spread functionality, which allows certain
bids and offers to imply prices from one contract month to
another, as well as the use of formula-based spreadsheet tools
and the development of administrative and monitoring tools.
Regulated
Soft Agricultural Future Products
ICE Futures U.S. is a leading world market for the trading
of soft commodities, including coffee, sugar,
cotton, orange juice and cocoa futures and options. ICE Futures
U.S. and its predecessor companies have offered trading in
traditional soft agricultural commodities for over
100 years and have maintained a strong franchise in these
products. These markets are designed to provide effective
pricing and hedging tools to industry users worldwide as well as
strategic trading opportunities for individual and institutional
investors.
12
These soft commodity contracts were listed electronically for
the first time in their history in February 2007. The prices for
many of our agricultural contracts serve as global benchmarks
for the physical commodity markets, including Sugar No. 11
(world raw sugar), Coffee C (Arabica coffee) and
Cotton No. 2 (cotton).
Through close cooperation with agricultural industry
participants, ICE Futures U.S. has supported the
development of innovative and internationally recognized futures
and options contracts that reflect the basic requirements of the
commodity industry. ICE Futures U.S.s contract committees,
in conjunction with industry representatives, continuously
review contracts and trading practices to adjust specifications
and procedures to introduce new contracts when cash market
conditions warrant change.
Soft agricultural products have historically accounted for most
of ICE Futures U.S.s trading volume. In 2007, soft
agricultural products represented approximately 93.0% of the
total number of futures and options contracts traded in ICE
Futures U.S.s markets.
Regulated
Agricultural Future Products
ICE Futures Canada is the only commodity futures exchange in
Canada that facilitates the trade of futures and options on
futures contracts for canola, feed wheat and western barley. ICE
Futures Canada, and its predecessor companies, have been
operating for over 137 years and have maintained a strong
franchise in agricultural commodities. ICE Futures Canada
contracts are designed to provide effective pricing and hedging
tools to industry users worldwide as well as strategic trading
opportunities for individual and institutional investors. ICE
Futures Canada markets converted to a fully electronic
marketplace in December 2004. The price of the canola futures
contracts is the worldwide benchmark. In 2007, the canola
contract represented approximately 92.6% of the total number of
contracts traded on the ICE Futures Canada marketplace.
Regulated
Financial Future Products
ICE Futures U.S. offers financial products in the currency
markets, equity index and commodity index markets, including the
US Dollar Index, or USDX, the Russell equity indexes, the
CCI and RJ/CRB and dozens of currency pair futures and options
contracts. In 2007, contracts traded in our financial product
markets represented 7.0% of the total number of contracts traded
in ICE Futures U.S.s futures and options markets.
ICE Futures U.S. offers specialized tools such as financial
cross-rate contracts to complement its global agricultural
markets. We provide futures and options markets for a variety of
currency pair contracts including euro-based,
U.S. dollar-based, yen-based, sterling-based and other
useful cross-rates as well as the original contract based on the
USDX introduced in 1985. By identifying interbank market signals
and customer needs, we developed currency contracts and defined
trading procedures that serve institutional financial managers.
These products began being introduced on our electronic platform
in the second half of 2007.
ICE Futures U.S. lists futures and options contracts on the
Russell Indices of U.S. equities, beginning with the
Russell 1000 Index in 1999, followed by the Russell 2000 and the
Russell 3000 along with the value and the growth components of
these indices. In June 2007, ICE entered into an exclusive
licensing agreement with Russell with respect to its
U.S. equity index future and options on futures, which will
commence in 2008.
Clearing
House Function
We currently operate our own clearing house for our ICE Futures
U.S. business through ICE Clear U.S. and for our ICE
Futures Canada business through ICE Clear Canada. These clearing
houses clear, settle and guarantee to their clearing members the
financial performance of all futures contracts and options on
futures contracts matched through our execution facilities and
accepted by the clearing house from clearing members in our
U.S. and Canadian futures markets. Through our clearing
houses, we maintain a system for performance of financial
obligations owed to the clearing members through which buyers
and sellers conduct transactions. This system is supported by
several mechanisms, including rigorous clearing membership
requirements, the posting of original margin deposits, daily
mark-to-market of positions and payment of variation margin,
maintenance of a guaranty fund in which clearing members
maintain deposits with our
13
clearing house and broad assessment authority to recoup
financial losses if they arise due to a clearing member
financial default. The amount of margin deposits on hand will
fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, the
extent of open positions held at any point in time by market
participants and the volatility of the market as reflected in
the margin rates then in effect for such contracts.
We believe that having an integrated clearing function provides
us with significant competitive advantages. Ownership and
control of our own clearing house at ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Clear Canada enables us to capture the revenue associated with
both the trading and clearing of our futures and options
contracts. This is particularly important for trade execution
alternatives such as privately negotiated block trades, where we
can derive a higher clearing fee for each contract traded
compared to trades executed on our platform. By owning these
clearing houses, we can also control the cost structure and the
technology development cycle for our clearing services and are
able to manage our new product initiatives without being
dependent on a third party approval. We intend to begin clearing
our ICE Futures Europe and OTC contracts through ICE Clear
Europe in the third quarter of 2008 upon the transition of this
business from LCH.Clearnet.
Our clearing houses are a significant attraction, and an
important part of the functioning of our exchanges. Because the
role of the clearing house is to serve as a single counterparty
for each matched trade, clearing members do not need to evaluate
the credit of each potential counterparty or limit themselves to
a selected set of counterparties. This flexibility increases the
potential liquidity available for each trade. Additionally, the
substitution of our clearing house as the counterparty for each
matched trade allows our customers to establish a position with
one party and then to offset the position with another party.
This contract offsetting process provides our customers with
flexibility in establishing and adjusting positions and provides
for original margin efficiencies.
In order to ensure performance, our clearing houses establish
and monitor financial requirements for our clearing members and
set minimum margin requirements for our traded products. Our
clearing houses use proprietary software, based on an industry
standard margining convention, to determine the appropriate
margin requirements for a member by simulating the gains and
losses of complex portfolios. We typically hold margin
collateral to cover at least 97% of price changes for a given
product within a given historical period.
At each settlement cycle, our clearing houses value, at the
market price prevailing at that time, or mark-to-market, all
open futures positions and require payments from clearing
members whose positions have lost value and make payments to
clearing members whose positions have gained value. Our clearing
houses mark-to-market all open futures positions at least twice
a day, and more often if market volatility warrants.
Marking-to-market provides both participants in a transaction
with an accounting of their financial obligations under the
contract.
Having a mark-to-market cycle of a minimum of two times a day
for ICE Clear U.S. and once daily for ICE Clear Canada
helps protect the financial integrity of our clearing houses,
our clearing members and market participants. This allows our
clearing houses to identify quickly any clearing members that
may not be able to satisfy the financial obligations resulting
from changes in the prices of their open contracts before those
financial obligations become exceptionally large and jeopardize
the ability of our clearing houses to ensure financial
performance of their open positions.
As a self-regulatory organization, ICE Clear U.S. has
instituted detailed risk-management policies and procedures to
guard against default risk with respect to cleared contracts. In
order to manage the risk of financial non-performance, we
(i) have established that clearing members maintain at
least $5 million in minimum working capital;
(ii) limit the risk exposure of open positions based upon
that clearing members capital; (iii) require clearing
members to post original margin collateral for all open
positions, and to collect original margin from their customers;
(iv) pay and collect variation margin on a marked-to-market
basis at least twice daily; (v) require clearing members to
collect funds from under-margined customers; (vi) require
deposits to the guaranty fund from clearing members which would
be available to cover financial non-performance; and
(vii) have broad assessment authority to recoup financial
losses.
ICE Clear Canada has instituted a similar multi-layered risk
management system of rules, policies and procedures to protect
against default which include (i) operational and financial
standards for clearing
14
participants applicable to category of registration,
(ii) requirements for clearing participants to post
original margin for house and client positions and requirements
to collect additional margin from clients, (iii) assessing
and collecting
intra-day
margin payments on a pre-determined basis, (iv) requiring
all clearing participants to pay into a guaranty fund and
(v) rules requiring all clearing participants to provide
additional monies for the clearing fund in the event of a
default.
We also maintain extensive surveillance and compliance
operations and procedures to monitor and enforce compliance with
rules pertaining to the trading, position sizes, delivery
obligations and financial condition of clearing members and
large trader accounts.
In the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing member,
we would first apply assets of the clearing member to cover its
payment obligation. These assets include original margin,
variation margin and the guaranty fund deposits and any other
available assets. In addition, we would make a demand for
payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to the
clearing houses by the parent of a clearing member. Thereafter,
if the payment default remains unsatisfied, we would use the
guaranty fund of other clearing members and funds collected
through an assessment against all other solvent clearing members
to satisfy the deficit. We have agreed to reserve
$50.0 million of the $250.0 million available under
our revolving credit facility for use by ICE Clear U.S. to
provide liquidity in the event of default by a clearing member.
ICE Clear Canada has arranged a total of $3.0 million in
revolving standby credit facilities with the Royal Bank of
Canada to provide liquidity in the event of default by a
clearing member.
As part of our powers and procedures designed to backstop
financial obligations in the event of a default, we may levy
assessments on all of our clearing members if there are
insufficient funds available to cover a deficit. There is no
limit on this assessment of each clearing member unless the
clearing member has notified the clearing house that it is
withdrawing as a clearing member. Despite our authority to levy
assessments, there can be no assurance that the relevant
clearing members will have the financial resources available to
pay, or will not choose to be expelled from membership rather
than pay, any such assessments. Despite the risk mitigation
techniques adopted by, and the other powers and procedures
implemented by our clearing houses, which are designed to, among
other things, minimize the potential risks associated with the
occurrence of monetary defaults, there can be no assurance that
these powers and procedures will prevent such defaults or will
otherwise function to preserve the liquidity of the clearing
houses.
Our clearing houses have an excellent risk management track
record. ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada, and their
predecessor companies, have never experienced an incident of a
clearing member default which has required the use of the
guaranty funds or assets of either clearing house.
Global
OTC Marketplace
Our transparent, electronic platform offers real-time access to
the liquidity in our global OTC energy markets
meaning the complete range of bids, offers, trades and volumes
posted for hundreds of contracts listed on our electronic
platform. Our platform displays a live ticker for all contracts
traded in our OTC markets and provides information relating to
each trade, such as the volume weighted average price and
transacted volumes by contract. We offer fast, secure and
anonymous trade matching services, which we believe generally
are offered at a lower cost compared to traditional means of
execution.
Our electronic platform provides trade execution on the basis of
extensive, real-time price data where trades are processed
accurately, rapidly and at minimal cost. We have designed our
technology platform to ensure the secure, high-speed flow of
data from trading desks through the various stages of trade
processing. Qualified participants executing in our markets
benefit from straight-through processing whereby trades are
automatically confirmed and routed to back office departments
and risk management systems. We believe that the broad
availability of real-time OTC energy market access and data,
together with the availability of cleared OTC contracts at the
same price as bilateral products, has allowed us to achieve a
critical mass of liquidity in our OTC markets. The following
diagram illustrates the processing of an OTC trade from order
entry to recording in a companys risk management system.
This process typically occurs within a matter of seconds.
15
OTC
Products Overview
We offer market participants a wide selection of derivative
contracts, as well as contracts for physical delivery of energy
commodities, to satisfy their risk management and trading
objectives. We offer trading in over 1,000 unique contracts as a
result of the availability of various combinations of products,
locations and strips meaning the duration or
settlement date of the contract. Excluding the strip element,
over 23,700 unique contracts based on products and hub locations
were traded in our OTC market in 2007. A substantial portion of
the trading volume in our OTC markets relates to approximately
20-25 highly
liquid contracts in natural gas, power and oil. For these
contracts, the highest degree of market liquidity resides in the
prompt, or front month, contracts, with decreasing liquidity for
longer-dated contracts.
On October 1, 2007, we acquired substantially all of the
assets of Chatham. Chatham is a leading OTC brokerage firm that
specializes in structuring and facilitating transactions in the
OTC markets for natural gas energy options. The acquisition of
Chatham has enabled the development and growth of our OTC
options business through Chathams brokerage activities and
will support the execution of our strategic plans to develop the
leading electronic marketplace for these OTC energy options.
We characterize the range of instruments that participants may
trade in our markets by reference to type of commodity (such as
global oil products, North American power, North American gas,
etc.), products (such as forwards and swaps, differentials and
spreads, and OTC options) and contracts (meaning products
specified by delivery dates).
The following table indicates the number of unique commodities,
products and contracts traded in our OTC business for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Commodities markets traded
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products traded
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts traded
|
|
|
23,780
|
|
|
|
17,540
|
|
|
|
15,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleared
OTC Contracts
We developed the concept of cleared OTC energy contracts, which
provide participants with access to centralized clearing and
settlement arrangements. As of December 31, 2007, we listed
107 cleared contracts, including 43 cleared natural gas
contracts, 49 cleared power contracts and 15 cleared oil
contracts, all of which are financially settled. Transaction
fees derived from trade execution in cleared electronic OTC
contracts were $167.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and represented 69.3% of our total OTC
revenues during the year ended December 31, 2007, net of
intersegment fees. This compares to $121.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 or 71.8% of our total OTC
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The introduction of cleared OTC contracts has reduced bilateral
credit risk and the amount of capital our participants are
required to post on each OTC trade, as well as the resources
required to enter into multiple negotiated bilateral settlement
agreements to enable trading with other counterparties. In
addition, the
16
availability of clearing for both OTC and futures contracts
traded in our markets enables our participants to cross-margin
their futures and OTC positions meaning that a
participants position in its futures or OTC trades can be
offset against each other, thereby reducing the total amount of
capital the participant must deposit with the futures commission
merchant clearing members, known as FCMs. In order to clear
transactions executed on our platform, a participant must
therefore either be a member of the clearing house itself, or
have an account relationship with an FCM that is a member.
FCMs clear transactions for participants in substantially
the same way they clear futures transactions for customers.
Specifically, each FCM acts as the conduit for payments, such as
margin and settlement, required to be made by participants to
the clearing house, and for payments due to participants from
the clearing house.
Cleared OTC contracts are available for trading on the same
screen and are charged the same commission rate as bilaterally
traded contracts. In a cleared OTC transaction, the clearing
house acts as the counterparty for each side to the trade,
thereby reducing counterparty credit risk in the traditional
principal-to-principal OTC markets. However, participants to
cleared trades also pay a clearing fee directly to the clearing
house and to an FCM. There are currently over 50 FCMs clearing
OTC transactions in our markets. Participants also have the
option to trade on a bilateral basis with the counterparty to
avoid paying fees to the clearing house and a FCM subject to the
availability of bilateral credit with the counterparty. While we
currently derive no revenue directly from providing access to
these clearing services through LCH.Clearnet, we believe the
availability of clearing services and attendant improved capital
efficiency has attracted new participants to the markets for
energy commodities trading. Therefore, we plan to introduce
clearing in the third quarter of 2008, with the establishment of
ICE Clear Europe as the clearing house for OTC markets and ICE
Futures Europe.
We have extended the availability of our cleared OTC contracts
to voice brokers in our industry through our block trading
facility. Block trades are those trades executed in the voice
broker market, typically over the telephone, and then
transmitted to us electronically for clearing. We charge
participants fifty percent of our standard commission fee for
block trades. We believe that our block trading facility is a
valuable part of our cleared business as it serves to expand our
open interest. As of December 31, 2007, open interest in
our cleared OTC contracts was 7.2 million contracts in
North American natural gas and power, and global oil, as
compared to 4.6 million contracts as of December 31,
2006. Open interest refers to the total number of contracts that
are currently open, in other words, contracts that have been
traded but not yet liquidated by either an offsetting trade,
exercise, expiration or assignment.
OTC
Trade Execution Services
We offer a broad range of automated OTC trade execution
services, including straight-through trade processing,
electronic trade confirmation, market data and risk management
functionality.
Automated
Trade Execution Services Straight-Through Trade
Processing.
Our electronic platform offers the following features:
|
|
|
|
|
Viewing Live Markets: Traders may view all
live, firm quotes posted by other traders in our markets.
|
|
|
|
Counterparty, Credit and Risk Management
Screening: Quotes visible to a participants
traders on the screen are color-coded. One color indicates that
quotes have originated from parties other than that participant.
Another color indicates whether or not particular quotes meet
counterparty, credit and risk management criteria established by
the participants risk management personnel.
|
|
|
|
Instant Messaging: Our instant messaging
service allows participants to communicate directly with others
in our markets on a secure, anonymous and real time basis.
|
|
|
|
Simple Click Execution: Traders may act on a
bid or an offer with one or more clicks of a mouse or use of a
shortcut key programmable
set-up.
|
|
|
|
Order Matching: Once an order is placed by a
participants trader, it is automatically matched with a
quote meeting the participants counterparty, credit and
risk management criteria at the best available
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
price. If there are two quotes at the same price, priority goes
to the one that was entered first. Orders are matched on an
anonymous basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application Programming Interfaces: Our
application programming interfaces allow participants to build
their own customized front office trading systems, which can be
linked to our platform, thereby enabling high speed data flow to
their trading desk and back through to their risk management,
settlement and accounting systems.
|
|
|
|
Automated Spreadsheet Trading: Participants
may send orders to, and execute trades on, our platform using
their own proprietary formulas and strategies without the use of
our application programming interfaces or any code level
programming.
|
|
|
|
Trade Reporting: A confirmation is
automatically transmitted to each party to a trade.
|
|
|
|
Order Monitoring and Deal Surveys: Traders are
able to monitor and manage the status of all bids and offers
that they have entered on our platform, across all markets.
|
|
|
|
Electronic Invoicing: Our platform generates
electronic invoices and other reports detailing the fees and
trading commissions due from each participant.
|
Electronic
Trade Confirmation Services
Our electronic trade confirmation system offers market
participants an efficient, reliable and automated alternative to
manual trade verification and confirmation. When trading on a
traditional exchange or through OTC voice brokers, market
participants typically manually prepare and exchange paper
confirmations evidencing trade execution in order to create a
legal record of the trade.
Our automated electronic trade confirmation system reviews
electronic trade data received from individual traders, screens
and matches this data electronically, then highlights any
discrepancies in a report to the traders respective back
offices. This allows back office personnel to focus primarily on
those trades that require correction and verification, rather
than also reviewing the larger percentage of trades without
discrepancies. Participants using this service may elect to use
this confirmation as the official record of the transaction in
place of the fax traditionally generated by participants
back offices.
Our electronic trade confirmation service accepts data from
trades executed on our platform, through other exchanges or
trading facilities or through OTC voice brokers. We believe that
the convenience and cost savings offered by our electronic trade
confirmation service could attract new participants to our
platform, increasing the revenues that we derive from OTC
transaction fees.
OTC
Risk Management Functionality
Trades in the OTC commodities markets historically have been
executed as bilateral contracts in which each counterparty bears
the credit
and/or
delivery risk of the other. Our electronic platform allows
participants to pre-approve trading counterparties and establish
parameters for trading with each counterparty, thereby enforcing
internal risk management policies. Participants may set
firm-wide limits on tenor (duration) and the total daily value
of trades that its traders may conduct with a particular
counterparty in a given market.
Market
Data Services
Through ICE Data, we generate market information and indices
based primarily upon auditable transaction data derived from
actual bid and offer postings and trades executed in our
markets. Therefore, this information is not affected by
subjective estimation or selective polling, the methodologies
that currently prevail in the OTC markets. Each trading day, we
deliver proprietary market data directly from our OTC market to
the desktops of thousands of market participants.
ICE Data publishes ICE daily indices for our spot natural gas
and power markets with respect to over 90 of the most active gas
hubs and over 20 of the most active power hubs in North America.
In 2005, ICE Data was recognized by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, or FERC, as the only publisher of natural
gas
18
and power indices to fully comply with all of the natural gas
and power index publishing standards identified in its Policy
Statement on Price Indices. ICE Data transmits our daily indices
via e-mail
to approximately 10,000 energy industry participants on a
complimentary basis each trading day. In the future, we may
begin charging recipients for what we believe is increasingly
valuable data.
The ICE Data end of day report is a comprehensive electronic
summary of trading activity in our OTC markets. The report
features indicative price statistics, such as last price, high
and low price, total volume, volume-weighted average price, best
and offer, closing bid and closing offer, for all natural gas
and power contracts that are traded or quoted on our platform.
This information is sold as various subscription based products.
Also, for both our futures and OTC markets, we offer view only
access to market participants who are not active traders, but
who still desire access to real-time prices of physical and
financial energy derivative contracts.
ICE Data market price validation, or MPV, service provides
independent, consensus forward curve and option values for
long-dated global energy contracts on a monthly basis. On the
last business day of each month, MPV service participant
companies, representing the worlds largest energy and
commodities trading entities, submit their month-end forward
curve and option prices for over 200 global commodity contracts.
MPV service participants use these consensus values to validate
internal forward curves, mark-to-market their month-end
portfolios and establish profit and loss valuations in
accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard Board, or
FASB, and the International Account Standards recommendations
concerning the treatment and valuation of energy derivative
contracts.
We provide our real-time futures data to data distributors,
commonly called quote vendors, or QVs. These companies such as
Bloomberg or Reuters then package this data into real-time,
tick,
intra-day,
delayed, end-of-day and historical data packages to sell to end
users. The real-time packages are accessed on a subscription
basis and the appropriate exchange fee is paid for
each user/screen taking ICE Futures U.S. or ICE Futures
Europe data. The futures data includes the trading activity in
those markets, including bids, offers, trades and other key
price information. End users include a range of financial
information providers, FCMs, pension funds, financial services
companies, funds, insurance companies, commodity pools and
individual investors.
Our
Participant Base
Futures
Business Participant Base
Participants of ICE Futures Europe include representatives from
segments of the underlying industries served by our energy
markets, including, among others, the oil, gas and power
industries. Participants currently trade in our energy futures
markets, either directly as members or through an ICE Futures
Europe member. The participant base in our energy futures
business is globally dispersed, although we believe a
significant proportion of our participants are concentrated in
major financial centers in North America, the United Kingdom,
Continental Europe and Asia. We have obtained regulatory
clearance or received legal advice confirming that there is no
legal or regulatory impediment for the location of screens for
electronic trading in our energy futures markets in 54
jurisdictions in addition to the United Kingdom for ICE Futures
Europe, including the United States, Singapore, Dubai and all of
the member countries of the European Economic Area. Like our OTC
participant base, the participant base in our energy futures
business has grown significantly since we acquired ICE Futures
Europe in 2001. Memberships in our energy futures markets
increased to 144 members for the year ended December 31,
2007 as demand for electronic access to global energy markets
increased.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures Europe,
which handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf
of their customers, accounted for 57.7%, 51.0% and 45.6% of our
energy futures business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Revenues from one member accounted for 18.2%,
15.4% and 13.3% of our energy futures business revenues, net of
intersegment fees, for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Revenues from two other members
accounted for 14.8% and 10.7% of our energy futures business
revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and another member accounted for 12.1% of
our energy futures business revenues, net of intersegment fees,
for the year ended
19
December 31, 2006. A substantial part of the trading
activity of these participants typically represents trades
executed on behalf of their respective clients, rather than by
the firm for their own account.
Trades in our energy futures markets may only be executed in the
name of an ICE Futures Europe member for its own or others
accounts. In order to become an ICE Futures Europe member, an
applicant must complete an application form, undergo a due
diligence review and execute an agreement stating that it agrees
to be bound by ICE Futures Europe regulations. All energy
futures trades executed on our electronic platform are overseen
by or attributable to responsible individuals. Each
member may register one or more responsible individuals, who are
responsible for trading activities of both the member and its
customers, and who are accountable to ICE Futures Europe for the
conduct of trades executed in the members name. As of
December 31, 2007, there were over 2,150 responsible
individuals registered in our energy futures market.
ICE Futures U.S.s trading members include representatives
from segments of the underlying industries served by our soft
agriculture and financial markets, including, among others, the
citrus, cocoa, coffee, cotton and sugar industries. Trading
rights are also held by FCMs, floor brokers and floor traders. A
trading membership in ICE Futures U.S. enables the holder
to trade any of the exchanges futures and options
contracts. ICE Futures U.S. also issues trading permits
that allow the holder to trade a specified category of products,
such as options or financial contracts. To gain membership
status, a person must be approved by the membership committee.
All floor brokers and floor traders must be appropriately
registered under CFTC regulations and must be guaranteed by a
member of ICE Clear U.S.
ICE Futures U.S. has approval to list its screens in 25
jurisdictions. Traders in these futures markets include hedgers,
speculators and investors. Hedgers are commercial firms that
trade futures and options to reduce their price risk exposure in
the cash market, protect their profit margins and assist in
business planning. Investors and speculators, who seek to profit
from fluctuating prices, typically place an order through FCMs,
or through introducing brokers, who have clearing relationships
with FCMs. Investors also participate in the markets by pooling
their funds with other investors in collective investment
vehicles known as commodity pools, which are managed by
commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors. The
CFTC requires commodity professionals to be registered by the
National Futures Association a CFTC-designated
futures association that is charged with enforcing ethical,
financial and customer protection standards in the futures
industry.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures U.S., which
handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf of
their customers, accounted for 38.4% of ICE Futures
U.S. business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the
period from January 12, 2007 to December 31, 2007. No
participant accounted for more than 10% of ICE Futures
U.S. business revenues for the period from January 12,
2007 to December 31, 2007.
ICE Futures Canadas market participants include
representatives from companies that hedge their cash products in
the markets, including international grain companies, feed lots,
and food processors, as well as FCMs and liquidity providers.
Individuals and companies can access ICE Futures Canadas
markets by registering as participants with ICE Futures Canada,
or trading through a registered participant. To gain participant
status, a company or individual submits standard written
application/agreement forms. All FCMs must be appropriately
registered with the statutory regulatory authority in their home
jurisdiction and any self-regulatory organizations required by
their statutory regulatory authority. All entities that have
direct trading status must be cleared by a registered clearing
participant of ICE Clear Canada.
ICE Futures Canada has approval to have trading be done directly
to its marketplace on screens in Canada, other than in Quebec,
and in the United States through a no-action letter issued by
staff of the CFTC dated December 2004. Trading may be done in
the United Kingdom pursuant to a reliance on the overseas
persons exemption.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures Canada,
which handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf
of their customers, accounted for 51.6% of ICE Futures Canada
business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the period from
August 27, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Revenues from
two
20
members accounted for 13.2% and 11.4%, respectively, of ICE
Futures Canada business revenues for the period from
August 27, 2007 to December 31, 2007.
OTC
Business Participant Base
Pursuant to the CEA, our global OTC markets are principals-only
markets, designed for professional traders or other commercial
market participants. Stringent requirements apply to
participants, which include some of the worlds largest
energy companies, financial institutions and other active
contributors to trading volume in global commodities markets.
They include oil and gas producers and refiners, power stations
and utilities, chemical companies, transportation companies,
banks, funds and other energy market participants. Our
participant base is global in breadth, with thousands of
participants located in 15 countries. The five most active
trading participants together accounted for 17.8%, 23.3% and
24.4% of our OTC business revenues, net of intersegment fees,
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. No participant accounted for more than 10% of our
OTC business revenues for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 or 2005.
Trading in our OTC markets is available to a participant that
qualifies as an eligible commercial entity, as defined by the
CEA and rules promulgated by the CFTC. Eligible commercial
entities must satisfy certain asset-holding and other criteria
and include entities that, in connection with their business,
incur risks relating to a particular commodity or have a
demonstrable ability to make or take delivery of that commodity,
as well as financial institutions that provide risk management
or hedging services to those entities. Pursuant to the
CFTCs oversight of our markets, since October 2006, we
report all cleared positions in our primary OTC contracts on a
daily basis to the CFTC through futures-style large trader
reports. In addition, during 2007, we added regulatory staff to
our OTC business and anticipate gaining increased authority to
have oversight of certain of these markets in the future.
We require each qualified participant to execute a participant
agreement, which governs the terms and conditions of its
relationship with each participant and grants the participant a
non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to access our
platform. While we generally establish the same contractual
terms for all of our users, in connection with our entry into
new commodities markets, we have from time to time agreed to
minor modifications to the terms of our participant agreement
for trading in new products. We expect that any future services
that we may introduce will also be covered by our participant
agreement, as we generally have a unilateral right to amend our
terms with advance notice. As the OTC markets mature and
conventions change, our participant agreement provides us with
considerable flexibility to manage our relationship with our
participants on an ongoing basis.
Market
Data Participant Base
Our market data revenues are derived from a diverse customer
base including the worlds largest commodity companies,
leading financial institutions, proprietary trading firms,
natural gas distribution companies and utilities, hedge funds
and private investors. From an OTC perspective, a large
proportion of our market data revenues are derived from sales of
market data to companies executing trades on our platform. We
also continue to see an increasingly diverse and expanding list
of non-participant companies purchasing our data and subscribing
to view-only screens. The primary customer base for our futures
market data revenues are the market data redistributors
themselves such as Bloomberg, CQG, Interactive Data Corporation
or Reuters who redistribute our real-time pricing data and remit
to us a real-time exchange fee based on the users access
to our data. For both OTC and futures market data, end users
include corporate traders, risk managers, individual
speculators, consultants and analysts. No participant accounted
for more than 10% of our market data revenues for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Product
Development
We leverage our customer relationships, global distribution,
technology infrastructure and software development capabilities
to diversify our products and services. New product development
is an ongoing process that is part of our daily operations. We
are continually developing, evaluating and testing new products
21
for introduction in our futures and OTC markets. Our goal is to
create innovative solutions in anticipation of, or in response
to, changing conditions in the markets for commodities trading
to better serve our participant base. The majority of our
product development relates to evaluating new contracts or
markets for trading
and/or
clearing. We generally are able to develop and launch new
bilateral OTC contracts for trading within a number of weeks.
For futures and cleared OTC contracts, we are required to
collaborate with the clearing houses with respect to a number of
aspects of the development process. As a result, the investment
of time and resources required to develop cleared products is
greater than for bilateral contracts. In addition, new contracts
in our futures markets must be reviewed and approved as needed
by the FSA, the CFTC, the MSC or possibly other foreign
regulators. We do not incur separate, identifiable material
costs in association with the development of new
products such costs are embedded in our normal costs
of operation.
While we have historically developed our products and services
internally, we also periodically evaluate and enter into
strategic partnerships to identify opportunities to develop
meaningful new products and services. If we believe our success
will be enhanced by collaboration with a third party, we will
enter into a licensing arrangement or other strategic
arrangement.
In support of our product development goals, we rely on the
input of our product management, clearing, technology and sales
teams, who we believe are positioned to discern and anticipate
our participants needs. In April 2005, we introduced
trading in futures contracts linked to E.U. Emissions Allowances
issued under the European Unions mandatory Emissions
Trading Scheme. These contracts are offered in our energy
futures markets in conjunction with the European Climate
Exchange, a subsidiary of the Chicago Climate Exchange. In
February 2006, we successfully launched the ICE WTI Crude
futures contract and we have also introduced over 90 new cleared
OTC contracts in 2006 and 2007. During 2007, we entered into
strategic alliances with NGI, NGX, Platts and Russell.
Technology
Technology is a key component of our business strategy that we
regard as crucial to our success. We design, build, and operate
the majority of our own software systems and believe that having
control of our technology allows us to be more responsive to the
needs of our customers, supports the dynamic nature of our
business and deliver the highest quality products. Our systems
are built using state-of-the-art software technologies and best
practices including modern programming languages,
component-based architectures, and a combination of leading-edge
open source and proprietary technology products. We leverage
proven industry standards from leading hardware, software and
networking providers, as well as emerging technologies we
believe will give us a competitive edge in technology
development. We take a customer focused, iterative and results
driven approach to software design and development that allows
us to deliver innovative, high quality solutions quickly and
effectively.
Significant investments in production planning, quality
assurance and certification processes have enhanced our ability
to expedite the delivery of the system enhancements that we
develop for our participants. We believe in offering our
customers a choice, and as such, our electronic platform is
accessible from anywhere in the world via the Internet,
traditional telecommunication hubs, the newly constructed ICE
Global Network, or through co-location at our primary data
center. Users can access our electronic trading platform via our
own web based interface, via ISVs, or build link in their own
computer systems via one of our application programming
interfaces, or APIs. Over the past two years we have intensely
focused on enhancing capacity and performance of our electronic
trading platform. This effort has resulted in the best
performing platform in our industry, as measured by transaction
times and reliability relative to other futures trading
platforms offered by other exchanges.
We also develop and operate software components used to support
mid- and back office services such as clearing, market data and
electronic confirmations. Our clearing infrastructure is
designed to be easily extendable to support integration with
additional clearing interfaces. We currently support clearing
integration to four clearing houses, including LCH.Clearnet,
KCBOT, The Clearing Corporation and our own ICE Clear
U.S. for the purposes of clearing and settling the markets.
We are currently developing the technology infrastructure for
our new yet to be launched clearing house, ICE Clear Europe.
22
We maintain relationships with a range of technology partners,
vendors and suppliers in respect of clearing services, software
licensing, hosting facilities and electronic trade routing. The
technology systems supporting our trading and clearing
operations can be best described into the following major
categories:
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
The employees that design, build, operate and support our
technology
|
Trading Systems, Software and Applications
|
|
The systems and applications that are the foundation of our
trading platform, clearing infrastructure and related systems
|
Data Centers, Global Network, and Distribution
|
|
The data centers, hardware and networking technologies that host
our platforms and support the ability of our participants to
access our marketplace across our global marketplace
|
Security and Disaster Recovery
|
|
Technologies that maximize and maintain the security of our
markets, as well as provide for the transition to a redundant
operating environment in the event of system failure due to
internal or external issues
|
Support Services
|
|
The services we provide to insure optimal trading and risk
management services and customer support services
|
Personnel
Our technology staff is among the most productive and efficient
in the industry. We carefully recruit talented individuals and
once in the organization, we foster a culture of
entrepreneurship, innovation, customer service and results. Our
electronic platform is designed, built and operated by our
personnel. As of December 31, 2007, we employed a team of
approximately 200 experienced technology specialists, including
product managers, project managers, system architects, software
developers, network engineers, security specialists, performance
engineers, systems and quality analysts, database
administrators, website designers, helpdesk and support
personnel. We have established a track record of operating a
successful electronic platform by developing and integrating
multiple evolving technologies that support substantial trading
and clearing volume growth. The integrated suite of technologies
that we employ has been designed to support a significant
expansion of our current business and provide us with the
demonstrated ability to integrate new markets, scale our
infrastructure, leverage our technology platform and
distribution into new markets, and to develop new products and
services rapidly and reliably.
Trading
Systems, Software and Applications
Our technology systems may be categorized into the following
areas: trading platform, WebICE, application program interfaces,
trading platform performance, clearing systems, and risk
management systems. Each is discussed below.
Trading
Platform
At the core of our trading business is our electronic trading
platform. Our platform supports all of our futures exchanges as
well as all of our OTC marketplace. Order matching, with a
proprietary spread-implication algorithm, constitutes the core
of our electronic platform. Large scale enterprise servers
provide the processing capacity for the matching engine, which
captures price requests by our participants and matches trades
instantaneously, based on the quantity and price at which orders
were entered.
Our platform supports functionality for trading in bilateral and
cleared OTC, futures and options on futures contracts. For the
futures products, the platform supports a myriad of order types,
matching algorithms, price reasonability checks, intercommodity
spread pricing and real-time risk management. In addition, we
have developed a multi-generation implied matching engine that
automatically discovers best bid and offer prices further out on
the forward curve. For OTC products we also support bilateral
trading with real-time credit risk management between
counterparties by commodity or company. We also offer brokers a
facility to block trades for all their products. Our core
functionality is available on a single platform for all of the
products that we offer electronically, rendering it highly
flexible and relatively easy to maintain. As a result,
enhancements made for one product can easily be propagated for
other products.
23
WebICE
Connectivity to our trading platform is available through our
own web based front-end, multiple ISVs and APIs. We provide
secure access to our electronic platform via a graphical user
interface, or front-end, known as WebICE. The WebICE graphical
user interface serves as a customizable, feature rich front-end
to our platform. WebICE provides an easy to use and easily
accessible front-end for the entire suite of futures and OTC
products we offer. Participants can access our platform globally
via the Internet by logging in via our website homepage. Our
platform can be accessed using a number of operating systems,
including Microsoft Windows Vista, 2000/XP, Linux and Mac OS.
Assuming all legal agreements are in place, a new participant
can be configured and onto our electronic platform within ten
minutes. Thousands of users globally access our electronic
platform each trading day via WebICE.
Application
Programming Interfaces (APIs)
We selectively offer our participants use of APIs that allow
users to create customized applications and services around our
electronic platform to suit their specific needs. Completely
redesigned over the last two years, our interfaces are
considered among the fastest and easiest to work with APIs in
the industry. Participants using APIs are able to link their own
internal computer systems to our platform and enable algorithmic
trading, risk management, data services, and straight through
processing. Our APIs also enable ISVs to adapt their products to
our platform, thereby offering our participants a wide variety
of front-end choices in addition to our WebICE interface
We offer the following APIs to direct access customers and ISVs:
|
|
|
|
|
Order Routing The order routing specification
is based on the industry standard Financial Information
eXchange, or FIX, protocol. The FIX message specification is
fully compliant with the standard protocol. This reduces the
time for development and maintenance for new and existing
clients since there are many third party tools and vendors who
support the same. We have developed FIX adapters that achieve
very low latency for all transactions.
|
|
|
|
Market Data In the past year, we have
developed a light weight, language independent and fast market
data feed called iMpact. This feed provides full depth of book
and can be used by both trading clients and Quote vendors. The
feed is designed to be scalable to handle the growth and volume
of messages. The feed is currently based on the TCP/IP protocol.
In 2008, we plan to offer this feed over multicast with
additional value-added features such as price levels that will
further reduce bandwidth requirements and latency.
|
|
|
|
Trade Capture We currently offer a java based
API to capture all trades done by a given company that can be
used by firms for managing position and risk of their traders.
In 2008, we will extend the use of FIX protocol for trade
capture so that our customer can reap the benefits of
simplification and lower development and maintenance costs.
|
|
|
|
Block Trade In 2008, we plan to extend the
use of the FIX protocol for booking block trades. This will
allow broker firms to book pre-consummated trades electronically
and increase efficiencies with this process.
|
|
|
|
OTC For OTC products that have complex
bilateral and cleared trading requirements, we also offer a
Java-based API that can be used to trade these products
electronically on the trading platform.
|
Trading
Platform Performance
Speed, reliability, scalability and capacity are critical
performance criteria for electronic trading platforms. A
substantial portion of our operating budget is dedicated to
system design, development and operations in order to achieve
high levels of overall system performance. In 2007, we completed
a major two-year technology initiative to rebuild and optimize
the trading platform software, hardware, network and security
components to increase speed, access, capacity, reliability and
functionality. Our platform now delivers the fastest published
round-trip transaction time in the commodity markets, with
average transaction times today
24
of three milliseconds in our futures markets, and a blended
average of seven milliseconds for futures and OTC markets.
In our business, latency performance is not only measured in
average time, but also in the percentage of outliers
particularly during peak trading periods. We define outliers as
any request taking over 50 milliseconds. These outlier metrics
characterize the consistency of the platforms performance.
Not only is our platform fast, it is also consistent with better
than 99.5% of transactions completing in less than 50
milliseconds during the busiest of trading periods. Our platform
is also highly reliable achieving 99.996% availability during
2007. Planning for capacity, performance and reliability is
something we take very seriously and has become a core
competency. We continually run benchmark tests and monitor our
production systems and make adjustments as necessary in order to
insure that our systems can handle approximately two to three
times our peak transactions in our highest volume products.
Clearing
Systems
Through our wholly-owned clearing house, ICE Clear U.S., a broad
range of trade management and clearing services are offered, and
as is the case with the trading system, ICE now designs,
develops, and operates its own clearing technology. In 2007, ICE
Clear U.S. launched a new Post Trade Management System, or
PTMS, to client firms to efficiently manage their trades and
trade allocations prior to their submission to the trade
clearance system. PTMS is used by brokers, clerks and clearing
members to manage trades executed electronically on our platform
as well as via floor trading. Direct integration of post-trade
management functions within our clearing members internal
systems is also available via our industry-standard FIXML
protocol-based messaging solution. Our core clearing system,
Extensible Clearing System, or ECS, supports open and delivery
position management, real-time trade and post-trade accounting,
risk management (daily and
intra-day
cash mark-to-market/option premium and initial margin using the
CME SPAN@ algorithm), collateral management, daily settlement
and banking. ECS is a state-of-the art system offering open
Internet-based connectivity and integration options for clearing
member access to user and account management, position reporting
and collateral management. ECS also has an extensive reporting
system which delivers on-line access to daily and historical
reports in multiple formats, as well as an extensive currency
delivery system to manage the delivery and payment of currency
settlements. As we do with the trading platform, we take a
proactive approach to enhancing the reliability, capacity and
performance of our clearing systems. In the past year, we have
improved the performance and capacity of each of our core
clearing components by a factor of ten.
Risk
Management Systems
ICE Risk, formerly Commoditrack, Inc., is a unique hosted risk
management solution we offer to our clients to provide them with
world class risk management features without significant
investment in software or hardware. Developed to be a hosted
solution, all data resides securely in our redundant data
centers. Utilizing the latest database technologies, clients can
securely access the system with a front-end from any computer
and see their entire real-time risk position. Streaming market
data over the same link allows us to provide real-time prices
and profit/loss position, enhanced with formula processing to
provide the most accurate real-time view possible. ICE Risk
maintains multiple views of trades, from the top level as they
were executed (like spreads, swaps, and other derivatives) all
the way down to the lowest level breakdown. This allows traders
and risk managers to operate at different levels, all while
viewing the same position. The system also offers the ability to
move forward and backward in time, so customers can view their
position and profit/loss position as it existed last month, or
how decaying trades and expirations will change in the future.
Data
Centers, Global Network and Distribution
In June 2007, we completed the construction of a state-of-the
art hosting center in Chicago, Illinois. The new hosting
facility includes expanded co-location capabilities and will
provide the physical space, electric power, and bandwidth
necessary to accommodate continued growth in our messaging
traffic, trading volume and customer base. The facility was used
temporarily as our disaster recovery site but became the primary
25
production site in January 2008. The Atlanta-based data center
then became the disaster recovery site for our technology
systems.
We offer access to our electronic markets through a broad range
of interfaces including dedicated lines, server co-location data
centers, telecommunications hubs in the U.S., Europe and Asia,
and directly via the Internet. In 2007, the completed the
build-out of the ICE Global Fiber Network which consists of high
speed dedicated fiber-optic lines connecting data hubs in New
York, Atlanta, Chicago, London and Singapore with the
exchanges primary and disaster recovery data centers. This
network offers customers an inexpensive, high speed,
high-bandwidth, fiber network solution to routing trading and
pricing messages between each of these data hub locations and to
the primary and secondary data centers.
In addition to our global network, the accessibility of our
platform through the Internet differentiates our markets and
serves to attract liquidity in our markets. As of
December 31, 2007, we had thousands of active connections
to our platform at over 1,500 OTC participant firms and over 750
futures participant firms. As of the fourth quarter of 2007,
there was an average of 8,400 simultaneous active connections
daily during peak trading hours. One active connection can
represent many individual traders. In addition, we have 29
conformed ISVs interfacing to our trading platform. As a result,
we have the potential to attract thousands of additional
participants who may trade in our markets through ISVs rather
than through our own front-end. Many ISVs represent a single
connection to our platform, though numerous participants may
access our markets through multiple ISVs.
For high velocity traders interested in the lowest latency
possible we offer server co-location space at our data centers.
This service allows customers to deploy their trading servers
and applications which virtually eliminates data transmission
latency between the customer and the exchange. The combination
of our easy to use trading and data APIs, rapid trade execution
and collocation serves to attract algorithmic traders which are
growing liquidity contributors in many of our markets.
Security
and Disaster Recovery
Physical and digital security are each critical to the operation
of our platform. At our corporate offices and at all of our data
centers, physical access controls have been instituted to
restrict access to sensitive areas. We also employ leading-edge
digital security technology and processes, including high level
encryption technology, complex passwords, multiple firewalls,
network level virus detection, intrusion detection systems and
secured servers.
We use a multi-tiered firewall scheme to control access to our
network. We have also incorporated several protective features
into our electronic platform at the application layers to ensure
the integrity of participant data and connectivity. For example,
we use access control profiles to prevent a given participant
from accessing data affiliated with another participant. We are
also able to restrict the functions that a particular user can
perform with any company data within a given application. Our
electronic platform monitors the connection with each user
connected to our platform. If a connection to a particular
participant can no longer be detected, certain outstanding
orders entered by that participant are automatically withdrawn
and held. Users have the ability to allow orders to remain in
the market as inactive after logging out or disconnecting from
our platform. In addition, though our electronic platform is
accessible over the Internet, it is able to restrict platform
access to designated IP addresses, if so desired by a
participant.
We use a remote data center to provide a point of redundancy for
our trading technology. Our
back-up
disaster recovery facility fully replicates our primary data
center and is designed to ensure the uninterrupted operation of
our electronic platforms functionality in the event of
external threats, unforeseen disasters or internal failures. In
the event of a major disruption, participants connecting to our
electronic platform would be rerouted automatically to the
disaster recovery facility. Our primary data center continuously
collects and saves all trade information and periodically
transmits it to our disaster recover site. For that reason, we
expect that our disaster recovery system would have current, and
in most cases real-time, information in the event of a platform
outage. In the event that we were required to complete a
changeover to our
back-up
disaster recovery facility, we anticipate that our platform
would experience less than six hours of down time.
26
Support
Services
All of our participants have access via
e-mail,
online and telephone to our specialized help desk, which
provides support with respect to general technical, business and
administrative questions, and is staffed 24 hours a day
from Sunday at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time until Friday at
6:30 p.m. Eastern Time. At all other times, support
personnel are available to assist our participants via mobile
phone and
e-mail. We
utilize customer relationship management software to assist
support staff in tracing inbound calls, web requests and
e-mails to
centralize issue reporting and resolution tracking. Each week a
summary of reported issues is compiled and sent to operations
management for review. In addition, our participants may access
training and informational materials, which are available on our
website.
Competition
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive. We face
competition in all aspects of our business from a number of
different enterprises, both domestic and international,
including traditional exchanges, electronic platforms and voice
brokers. Prior to the passage of the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act of 2000, or the CFMA, futures trading was
generally required to take place on, or subject to the rules of,
a federally designated contract market. The costs and difficulty
of obtaining contract market designation and corresponding
regulatory requirements created significant barriers to entry
for competing exchanges. The CFMA and other changing market
dynamics have led to increasing competition from a number of
different domestic and international sources of varied size,
business objectives and resources.
We believe we compete on the basis of a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
depth and liquidity of markets;
|
|
|
|
price transparency;
|
|
|
|
reliability and speed of trade execution and processing;
|
|
|
|
technological capabilities and innovation;
|
|
|
|
breadth of product range;
|
|
|
|
rate and quality of new product developments;
|
|
|
|
quality of service;
|
|
|
|
distribution and ease of connectivity;
|
|
|
|
mid- and back-office service offerings, including differentiated
and value-added services;
|
|
|
|
transaction costs; and
|
|
|
|
reputation.
|
We believe that we compete favorably with respect to these
factors, and that our deep, liquid markets; breadth of product
offerings; new product development; and efficient, secure
settlement, clearing and support services distinguish us from
our competitors. We believe that in order to maintain our
competitive position, we must continue to develop new and
innovative products and services; enhance our technology
infrastructure; maintain liquidity and offer competitive
transaction costs.
Our
Principal Competitors
Currently, our principal competitors include exchanges such as
the New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange, or CME, and London International Financial
Futures and Options Exchange, or LIFFE, which is now part of
NYSE Euronext. In April 2006, NYMEX and CME announced that they
had entered into a definitive technology services agreement
under which CME, through CME Globex, is the exclusive electronic
trading services provider for NYMEXs energy futures and
options contracts. Subsequently, the volume of NYMEX energy
futures contracts traded through Globex surpassed the volume of
NYMEX energy futures contracts traded in its open-outcry market.
Among its primary products, NYMEX
27
offers trading in WTI light sweet crude oil futures and Henry
Hub natural gas futures contracts. In addition, we currently
compete with:
|
|
|
|
|
voice brokers active in the OTC commodities markets;
|
|
|
|
other electronic trading platforms for derivatives; and
|
|
|
|
market data vendors.
|
Competition
in our Futures Business
In our energy futures business, ICE Futures Europe, we currently
compete with global exchanges such as NYMEX, CME and the Tokyo
Commodity Exchange, or TOCOM, and European natural gas and power
exchanges, such as the European Energy Exchange. There are also
several exchanges that may, in the future, offer trading in
contracts that compete with our futures exchanges. In addition,
the recent consolidation of, and development of industry
alliances has resulted in a growing number of and
well-capitalized trading services providers, which compete with
all or portions of our business.
ICE Futures U.S. faces competition from traditional
exchanges as well as from new entrants to the derivatives
exchange sector. According to Futures Industry Association, ICE
Futures U.S. is currently the third largest derivatives
exchange in the U.S. The CME, the largest derivatives
exchange in the United States, competes with ICE Futures
U.S. in its markets for foreign currency and equity index
contracts. In December 2006, NYMEX listed cash-settled versions
of ICE Futures U.S.s physically delivered soft
agricultural contracts, initiating competition with ICE Futures
U.S. for the first time. Certain of NYMEXs soft
agricultural contracts have since been de-listed. Following the
merger of the CME and CBOT in July 2007, ICE Futures
U.S. expects that competition will intensify.
ICE Futures U.S. also faces limited competition abroad from
NYSE Euronext. Currently, ICE Futures U.S. competes
directly with NYSE Euronext in the cocoa, sugar and coffee
markets. ICE Futures U.S. also competes on a limited basis
with other exchanges such as the Tokyo Grain Exchange and the
Brazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange. At any time, a
regional exchange in an emerging market country, such as India
or China, or a producer country could attract enough activity
from outside its borders to compete with ICE Futures U.S.s
status as the benchmark pricing market for a given commodity.
ICE Futures Canada competes primarily with NYSE Euronexts
rapeseed contract and, to a lesser extent, the Australian
Securities Exchanges canola futures contract. There are no
other exchanges that list contracts for western barley or
Canadian feed wheat, although the Minneapolis Grain Exchange,
the Kansas City Board of Trade and CME have wheat contracts that
can be used to hedge Canadian wheat.
In addition to competition from derivates exchanges that offer
commodity products, our futures business also faces competition
from other exchanges, electronic trading systems, third party
clearing houses, FCMs and technology firms.
Competition
in Our OTC Business
Certain financial services or technology companies, in addition
to the competitors named above, have entered the OTC electronic
trading services market. Additional joint ventures and consortia
could form, or have been formed, to provide services that would
potentially compete with certain services that we provide.
Others may acquire the capacity to compete with us through
acquisitions. If we expand into new markets in the future, we
could face significant competition.
Competition
in Our Market Data Business
We compete in the market data sector based on our data for
futures markets and OTC markets. Competition for real-time data
comes from both the U.S. and European exchanges and
online brokers such as ICAP and Tradition Financial
Services, which list and sell market data relating to OTC
contracts that
co-exist
along side our futures contracts. Competition for OTC market
data comes from voice brokerage firms
28
such as Amerex, whose market data is derived from their
brokerage activities in the North American power and gas
markets, market price assessment and reporting organizations
such as Platts and NGI, as well as market data redistributors
such as Bloomberg and Reuters, which produce their own OTC price
assessments.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a wide range of intellectual property. We own or have
a license to use all of the software that is essential to the
operation of our electronic platform, much of which has been
internally-developed by our technology team since our inception.
In addition to our software, we regard certain business methods
and our brand names, marketing elements, logos and market data
to be valuable intellectual property. We protect this
intellectual property by means of patent, trademark, service
mark, copyright and trade secret laws, contractual restrictions
on disclosure and other methods.
We license a U.S. patent for an apparatus and method for
trading electric energy and share the rights and benefits of
this patent. Also, we are co-owners (together with NYMEX) of a
U.S. patent directed to an implied market trading system.
We currently have licenses to use several U.S. patents,
including the Togher family of patents, which relate to the way
in which bids and offers are displayed on an electronic trading
system in a manner that permits parties to act only on those
bids and offers from counterparties with whom the party has
available credit. In connection with the settlement of patent
infringement litigation with EBS Dealing Resources, Inc., or
EBS, we obtained from EBS a worldwide, fully paid, non-exclusive
license to use technology covered under patents known as the
Togher patents (presently issued or to be issued in the future
claiming priority to U.S. patent application 07/830,408).
As a fully paid license, we pay no royalties to EBS on an
ongoing basis. The EBS license expires on the latest expiration
of the underlying patents. Additionally, on May 2, 2006, we
received a U.S. patent jointly owned with NYMEX for an
implied market trading system. The joint patent covers a method
for a computer-based trading system that implies spread markets
for multiple real or implied spread markets.
We cannot guarantee that the Togher patents, the joint patent
with NYMEX or any other patents that we may license or acquire
in the future, are or will be valid and enforceable.
We have several U.S. and foreign patent applications
pending, including with respect to our electronic trade
confirmation service, our ICEMaker system, and our OTC clearing
service. We can provide no assurance that any of these
applications will result in the issuance of patents.
We have received several U.S. federal registrations on
trademarks used in our business, including
IntercontinentalExchange,
IntercontinentalExchange + design, ICE
and ICE + design. We have also received
U.S. federal registrations on other services or products we
provide, including ICEMaker, ICEBLOCK,
ICE DATA, ICE DATA + block design,
ICE Futures, ICE Futures + block design,
WEBICE, IPN ICE Private Network &
Design, The Interchange, Trade the
World, The Edge in Energy, The Energy
Marketplace, 10X, and 10X +
design. In addition, we have several foreign and
U.S. applications pending for other marks used in our
business. For instance, in the United States, we have
applications pending for the marks: ICE Clear,
ICE Clear U.S., ICE Clear Canada,
ICE Clear Europe, ICE Futures U.S.,
ICE Futures Canada, ICE Futures Europe,
ICE eConfirm, ICE iMpact, and ICE
Risk. In Canada, we have applications pending for the
marks: ICE, ICE + block design,
ICE Clear, ICE Clear U.S., ICE
Clear Canada, ICE Clear Europe, ICE
Futures, ICE Futures + block design, ICE
Futures U.S., ICE Futures Canada, ICE
Futures Europe, ICE eConfirm, ICE
iMpact, ICEMAKER, ICE Risk,
ICE DATA, and ICE DATA + block design.
In the European Union, we have applications pending for the
marks: ICEMAKER, ICE Clear, ICE
Clear U.S., ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures
Canada, ICE Futures Europe, ICE
eConfirm, ICE iMpact, and ICE
Risk. In Singapore, we have applications pending for the
marks: ICE Clear, ICE Clear U.S.,
ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear Europe,
ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures Canada,
ICE Futures Europe, ICE eConfirm,
ICE iMpact, and ICE Risk. We can provide
no assurance that any of these applications will mature into
registered trademarks.
29
ICE Futures U.S.s key strength is the brand recognition of
its soft commodity products. Unlike our
U.S. competitors, which have larger corporate identities,
ICE Futures U.S.s primary brand identity is derived from
the individual benchmark contracts that it trades. ICE Futures
U.S.s most significant brands are Coffee C,
Sugar No. 11 and Cotton No. 2. We protect these brand
names, as well as other products and services by relying on
trademark law and contractual safeguards. ICE Futures
U.S. owns the following registered service marks: Coffee
C, eCOPS, FINEX, TIPS, U.S. Dollar Index, and
USDX. ICE Futures U.S also licenses the following trademarks
from third parties: Russell 1000, Russell 1000 Value, Russell
1000 Growth, Russell 2000, Russell 2000 Value, Russell 2000
Growth, Russell 3000, Russell 3000 Value, Russell 3000 Growth,
Russell Top 200, Russell Top 200 Value, Russell Top 200 Growth,
Russell MidCap, Russell MidCap Value, Russell MidCap Growth,
Russell 2500, Russell 2500 Growth, Russell Small Cap
Completeness
Indextm,
Russell Small Cap Completeness Value
Indextm
and Russell Small Cap Completeness Growth
Indextm.
These are trademarks and service marks of the Russell Investment
Group. ICE Futures U.S. has an exclusive license to use the
trademark of the Russell Investment Group. ICE Futures
U.S. also licenses the NYSE Composite Index from NYSE
Euronext. ICE Futures U.S.s license with the NYSE Euronext
is an exclusive license to list and trade futures and options
contracts on the NYSE Composite Index. ICE Futures
U.S. also has an exclusive license with Reuters America,
LLC to list and trade futures and options contracts on the
Reuters Jefferies CRB Futures Price Index and the Continuous
Commodity Index.
We also have several foreign trademark registrations, including:
ICE, IntercontinentalExchange, and
IntercontinentalExchange + design, in the European
Union; ICEMAKER, ICE Futures and
ICE Futures + block design in Singapore; and
ICEBLOCK in the European Union, China, Hong Kong,
Norway, Singapore, and Switzerland.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
also contains additional trade names, trademarks and service
marks of our and of other companies. We do not intend the use or
display of other parties trademarks, trade names or
service marks to imply, and this use or display should not be
construed to imply, our endorsement or sponsorship of these
other parties, their endorsement or sponsorship of it, or any
other relationship between it and these other parties.
Sales
As of December 31, 2007, we employed 63 full-time
sales personnel. Our global sales team is managed by a futures
industry sales and marketing professional and is comprised
primarily of former brokers and traders with extensive
experience and established relationships within the commodity
trading community. Since our futures business is highly
regulated, we also employ sales and marketing staff
knowledgeable with respect to the regulatory constraints upon
marketing in this field.
Our marketing strategy is designed to expand relationships with
existing participants through the provision of value-added
products and services, technology support and product
information, as well as to attract new participants, including
those in markets and geographic areas where we do not currently
have a strong presence. We also seek to build brand awareness
and promote greater public understanding of our business,
including how our technology can improve current approaches to
price discovery and risk management in the energy markets.
We use a cross-promotional sales and marketing team for our
futures and OTC businesses. We believe this approach is
consistent with, and will provide more effective support of, the
underlying emphasis of our business model an open
architecture with flexibility that allows us to anticipate and
respond rapidly to customers and evolving trends in the markets
for commodities trading, while maintaining separate markets on a
regulatory basis.
We typically pursue our marketing goals through a combination of
on-line promotion through our website, third party websites,
e-mail,
print advertising,
one-on-one
client relationship management and participation in trade shows
and conferences. From time to time, we also provide commission
rate discounts of limited duration to support new product
launches. We participate in a number of domestic and
international trade shows, conferences and seminars regarding
futures, options on futures and OTC markets and other marketing
events designed to inform market participants about our products.
30
Our marketing department designs materials, information and
programs to educate market participants about our products and
services. We seek to educate these users about changes in
product design, margin requirements and product usage. Our sales
and marketing effort typically involves the development of
personal relationships with market participants who actively use
our markets to ensure that our product and service offerings are
based on their needs.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we had a total of
506 employees, with 167 employees at our headquarters
in Atlanta, 218 in New York, 81 in London and a total of
40 employees in our Winnipeg, Houston, Chicago, Singapore,
Dublin and Calgary offices. ICE Futures U.S. is a party to
a collective bargaining agreement, which represents a small
percentage of its trading floor employees. We have not
experienced any work stoppages, and we believe our relationship
with our employees is good.
Business
Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery
We maintain comprehensive business continuity and disaster
recovery plans and facilities to provide continuous availability
in the event of a business disruption or disaster.
Planning
We maintain incident and crisis management plans that address
how we would respond to a crisis event at any of our locations
world wide. We are committed to continuously understanding and
evaluating business risks and their impact on operations,
providing training to employees and performing exercises to
validate the effectiveness of our plans by participating in
industry sponsored disaster recovery and business continuity
exercises. We have invested in technology that will allow us to
manage incidents, track results and continuously update our
plans. We also utilize our strategic partners to provide an
independent view of the continued viability of our plans.
Datacenters
We use a remote data center to provide a point of redundancy for
our trading technology. Our
back-up
facility fully replicates our primary data center and is
designed to ensure the uninterrupted operation of our electronic
platforms functionality in the face of external threats,
unforeseen disasters or internal failures. In the event of an
emergency, participants connecting to our electronic platform
would be rerouted automatically to the
back-up
facility. Our primary data center continuously collects and
saves all trade information and periodically transmits it to our
back-up
facility. For that reason, we expect that our disaster recovery
system would have current, and in most cases real-time,
information in the event of a platform outage. In the event that
we were required to complete a changeover to our
back-up
disaster facility, we anticipate that our platform would
experience less than six hours of down time. Our primary
datacenter is currently located in Chicago, Illinois. We
currently maintain a disaster recovery hot-site in a secured
Tier-1 datacenter in Atlanta, Georgia.
People
Office facilities are protected against physical unavailability
via our incident management plans. Dedicated business continuity
facilities in Atlanta, New York, London and Winnipeg are
maintained for employee relocation in the event that a main
office is unavailable. Incident management plans place a
priority on the protection of our employees.
Regulation
We are primarily subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory
agencies in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada.
With respect to the ICE Futures Europe products, we have
permission from 55 jurisdictions to allow trading on our
platform. With respect to the ICE Futures U.S. products, we
have permission from 25 jurisdictions to allow trading on our
platform. With respect to the ICE Futures Canada
31
products, we have permission from Canada (except Quebec), the
United States and are able to facilitate trading under a
statutory exemption in the United Kingdom.
Regulation
of Our OTC Business in the United States
We operate our OTC electronic platform as an exempt commercial
market under the CEA and regulations of the CFTC. The CFTC
generally oversees, but does not currently substantively
regulate, the trading of OTC derivative contracts on our
platform. Each of our participants must qualify as eligible
commercial entities, as defined by the CEA, and each participant
must trade for its own account, as a principal. Eligible
commercial entities include entities with at least
$10 million in assets that incur risks (other than price
risk) relating to a particular commodity or have a demonstrable
ability to make or take delivery of that commodity, as well as
entities that regularly purchase or sell commodities or related
contracts that are either (i) funds offered to participants
that do not meet specified sophistication standards that have
(or are part of a group of funds that collectively have) at
least $1 billion in assets, or (ii) have, or are part
of a group that has, at least $100 million in assets. We
have also obtained orders from the CFTC permitting us to treat
floor brokers and floor traders on U.S. exchanges and ICE
Futures Europe as eligible commercial entities, subject to their
meeting certain requirements. As an exempt commercial market, we
are required to comply with access, reporting and record-keeping
requirements of the CFTC. In 2006, we undertook technology
enhancements and processes to begin reporting on a daily basis
to the CFTC all cleared futures-look-alike positions. Our OTC
business is not otherwise currently subject to substantive
regulation by the CFTC or other U.S. regulatory
authorities. However, both the CFTC and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, or FERC, have view only access to our
trading screens on a real-time basis. In addition, we are
required to:
|
|
|
|
|
report to the CFTC certain information regarding transactions in
products that are subject to the CFTCs jurisdiction and
that meet certain specified trading volume levels,
|
|
|
|
report to the CFTC certain large trader position information for
our cleared OTC natural gas markets pursuant to special call
issued by the CFTC,
|
|
|
|
record and report to the CFTC complaints that we receive of
alleged fraud or manipulative trading activity related to
certain of our products, and
|
|
|
|
if it is determined by the CFTC that any of our markets for
products that are subject to CFTC jurisdiction serve a
significant price discovery function (that is, they are a source
for determining the best price available in the market for a
particular contract at any given moment), publicly disseminate
certain market and pricing information free of charge on a daily
basis.
|
In December 2007, the United States Senate and a committee of
the House of Representatives passed legislation to increase
regulation of OTC markets. While the final legislation may
change, both bills would require and grant authority to OTC
electronic trading facilities to assume self regulatory
responsibilities, such as market monitoring and establishing
position limits or accountability limits, over contracts that
serve a significant price discovery function. Presently, we
believe that we would be required under the legislation to
assume regulatory responsibilities over at least one OTC
contract, the Henry Hub natural gas swap. The legislation could
deter trading on our platform. In addition, we would incur
additional costs in order to comply with new regulations in the
OTC markets. However, these are not believed to be material on a
consolidated basis. Specifically, the Senate version of the
legislation would require us to become a registrant of the CFTC,
which could mean that we may have to pay a regulatory fee on
each trade to a registered futures association.
In addition to the legislation above, several pieces of
legislation have recently been introduced in Congress that would
(i) increase regulation of the bilateral OTC market and
(ii) place a fee on cleared trades to fund the CFTC. If any
of these proposals are adopted, they could restrict or foreclose
some of our business, require us and our participants to operate
under heightened regulatory burdens and incur additional costs
in order to comply with additional regulations, and could deter
some participants from trading on our OTC platform.
We cannot predict whether this legislation will be adopted. If
such legislation or other legislation were to be enacted into
law, it could have an adverse effect on our business.
32
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 grants to the FERC the power to
prescribe rules related to the collection and government
dissemination of information regarding the availability and
price of natural gas and wholesale electric energy. In 2006,
FERC also issued final rules clarifying the agencys
authority over market manipulation by all electricity and
natural gas sellers, transmission owners and pipelines,
regardless of whether they are regulated by FERC. In July 2007,
FERC brought its first case using its new authority against
Amaranth Advisors, LLC. FERCs standard to prove
manipulation is lower than the CFTCs. Thus, given the
lower standard, it is possible that FERC may bring more actions
against our market participants. FERCs new authority and
possible future exercises of its rulemaking powers will impose
additional regulatory compliance costs on us and could adversely
impact demand for our data products in the United States. In
addition, recently passed legislation provided the Federal Trade
Commission with jurisdiction over fraud or false reports in
connection with transactions in crude oil or petroleum
distillates. The Federal Trade Commissions exercise of
this authority could also adversely affect trading activity on
our platform.
Regulation
of Our Business in the United Kingdom and Europe
In the United Kingdom, we also engage in a variety of activities
related to our business through subsidiary entities that are
subject to regulation by the UKs FSA. ICE Futures Europe
is recognized as an investment exchange by the FSA in accordance
with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA. As
such, ICE Futures Europe maintains front-line regulatory
responsibility for its markets and is subject to regulatory
oversight by the FSA. In order to retain its status as a
recognized investment exchange, ICE Futures Europe is required
to dedicate sufficient resources to its regulatory functions and
to meet various regulatory requirements relating to sufficiency
of financial resources, adequacy of systems and controls and
effectiveness of arrangements for monitoring and disciplining
its members. Failure to comply with these requirements could
subject ICE Futures Europe to significant penalties, including
de-recognition.
Further, we engage in sales and marketing activities in relation
to our OTC business through our subsidiary ICE Markets Limited,
or ICE Markets, which is authorized and regulated by the FSA as
an arranger of deals in investments and as an agency broker. ICE
Markets agreed to be subject to certain aspects of the
FSAs Alternative Trading Systems regime which include
various reporting, record keeping, and monitoring obligations
with respect to use by its participants of our electronic
trading platform.
The regulatory framework in relation to ICE Futures
Europes status as a recognized investment exchange is
supplemented by a series of legislative provisions regulating
the conduct of participants in the regulated market.
Importantly, FSMA contains provisions making it an offense to
engage in certain market behavior and prohibits market abuse
through the misuse of information, the giving of false or
misleading impressions or the creation of market distortions.
Breaches of those provisions give rise to the risk of criminal
or civil sanctions, including financial penalties. It should be
noted, that under FSMA, ICE Futures Europe, as a recognized
investment exchange, enjoys statutory immunity in respect of any
claims for damages brought against it relating to any actions it
has undertaken (or in respect of any action it has failed to
take) in good faith, in the discharge of its regulatory function.
The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive
2004/39/EC) came into force on November 1, 2007, and
introduced a harmonized approach to the licensing of services
relating to commodity derivatives across the European Economic
Area. The legislation also imposed greater regulatory burdens on
E.U.-based operators of regulated markets, alternative trading
systems and authorized firms in the commodity derivatives area.
The legislation also introduced the concept of a pan-European
passport allowing ICE Futures Europe to offer
services in all European Economic Area member states in which
our participants are based on the basis of UK regulation. This
legislation is consistent with other initiatives introduced to
provide a more harmonized approach to European regulation, for
example, the Market Abuse Directive (Directive 2003/06/EC) which
came into force in October 2004 introducing a specific
prohibition against insider dealing in commodity derivative
products.
Regulation
of our ICE Futures U.S. Business
ICE Futures U.S.s operations are subject to extensive
regulation by the CFTC under the CEA. The CEA generally requires
that futures trading conducted in the United States be conducted
on a commodity exchange
33
designated as a contract market by the CFTC. It also establishes
non-financial criteria for an exchange to be designated to list
futures and options contracts. Designation as a contract market
for the trading of specified futures contracts is non-exclusive.
This means that the CFTC may designate additional exchanges as
contract markets for trading in the same or similar contracts.
As a designated contract market, ICE Futures U.S. is a
self-regulatory organization that has instituted detailed rules
and procedures to comply with the core principles
applicable to it under the CEA. ICE Futures U.S. also has
surveillance and compliance operations and procedures to monitor
and enforce compliance with its rules, and ICE Futures
U.S. is periodically audited by the CFTC with respect to
the fulfillment of ICE Futures U.S.s self-regulatory
programs in these areas. The cost of regulatory compliance is
substantial.
Additional legislation or regulation, or changes in existing
laws and rules or their interpretation, may directly affect ICE
Futures U.S.s mode of operation and profitability. The
regulations under which ICE Futures U.S. has operated since
1974 have been changed in a manner that will permit unregulated
competitors and competitors in other regulated industries to
attempt to trade ICE Futures U.S.s products in their own
trading facilities without the same regulatory costs that ICE
Futures U.S. bears and allow ICE Futures U.S.s
competitors to trade futures contracts identical to the ones
that ICE Futures U.S. offers without any form of regulation
or oversight by the CFTC under certain circumstances. Generally,
those exclusions are available to markets limited to financial
products traded among institutions, whether traded
electronically or not. ICE Futures U.S. could also comply
with those exclusions and operate markets that are outside CFTC
jurisdiction.
The CFTC is subject to periodic reauthorization by Congress.
Congress is currently undertaking this process of reviewing the
laws and regulations embodied in the CEA to ensure that those
affecting the futures industry are adequate as market conditions
evolve. Changes made to the regulatory framework for exchanges
during reauthorization could make it easier for others to
compete with ICE Futures U.S. at a lower regulatory cost.
Regulation
of our ICE Futures Canada Business
ICE Futures Canadas operations are subject to extensive
regulation by the Manitoba Securities Commission, or MSC, under
the CFA. The CFA requires that an organization must be
recognized and registered before it can carry on the business of
a futures exchange. It establishes financial and non-financial
criteria for an exchange. Registration and recognition under the
CFA is non-exclusive. This means that the MSC may recognize and
registered additional exchanges as futures exchanges for trading
in the same or similar contracts. In addition, ICE Futures
Canada is also recognized by the MSC as a self-regulatory
organization and is required to institute and maintain detailed
rules and procedures to fulfill its obligations. ICE Futures
Canada also has surveillance and compliance operations and
procedures to monitor and enforce compliance by market
participants with its rules, and ICE Futures Canada is under the
audit jurisdiction of the MSC with respect to these
self-regulatory functions. ICE Futures Canada has a significant
number of trading terminals in the United States for which it
has received a no action letter. The no action letter requires
it to comply with the requirements of the CFTC including making
regular filings. The cost of regulatory compliance is
substantial.
Additional legislation or regulation, or changes in existing
laws and rules or their interpretation, may directly affect ICE
Futures Canadas mode of operation and profitability. The
regulations under which ICE Futures Canada operates permit
competitors in other regulated industries to attempt to trade
ICE Futures Canadas products in their own trading
facilities.
Industry
Overview
The markets for commodities trading include trading in both
physical commodities contracts and derivative
instruments instruments that derive their value from
an underlying commodity or index across a wide
variety of products. Derivative instruments provide a means for
hedging price risk, asset allocation, speculation or arbitrage.
Contracts for physical commodities allow counterparties to
contract for the delivery of the underlying physical asset.
34
The
Futures Market
A futures exchange typically operates as an auction market,
where trading is conducted either on an electronic platform or
on an open-outcry trading floor. In an auction market, prices
are established publicly either on a screen or on the floor of
an exchange by participants posting bids, or buying indications,
and offers, or indications to sell. A futures exchange offers
trading of standardized contracts and provides access to a
centralized clearing system. Commodity futures exchanges are
regulated in the United States by the CFTC and are required to
publish certain information, such as contract settlement prices
and participant information. Commodity futures exchanges are
regulated in the United Kingdom by the FSA and in Canada by the
MSC. In a typical futures market, participants can trade two
types of instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
Futures: A future is the most common
exchange-traded commodity contract. It is a standardized
contract to buy or sell a specified quantity of an underlying
asset during a particular month (an exact delivery date or a
range of dates will be specified). Contract sizes are
standardized and differ by commodity. For example, the ICE Brent
Crude futures contract has a contract quantity of 1,000 net
barrels, or 42,000 U.S. gallons. The price of the futures
contract is determined through the auction process on the
exchange. Futures contracts are settled through either physical
delivery or cash settlement, depending on the contract
specification.
|
|
|
|
Options: An option is a contract that conveys
to the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to call (buy) or
put (sell) an underlying futures contract at a price determined
at the time of the execution of the option.
|
Historically, trading in futures contracts took place
exclusively through face-to-face interaction on a physical
trading floor by members of an exchange, also known as a
pit, through an auction process known as
open-outcry. In an open-outcry market, the matching
of buyers and sellers is achieved by traders in the pit locating
other traders in the pit who have an opposite trading interest.
As the name implies, traders cry out their bids and
offers, often in combination with a system of hand signals, with
the objective of finding a counterparty with whom to trade.
All futures contracts and options on futures contracts are
cleared through a central clearing house. Clearing is the
procedure by which each futures and options contract traded on
an exchange is, typically, novated, or replaced, with a contract
with the clearing house. In this process, the clearing house is
interposed between the trading parties and becomes the buyer to
each member firm that is a seller, and the seller to each member
firm that is a buyer. By interposing itself between the member
firm parties of every trade, the clearing house guarantees each
member firm partys performance, and eliminates the need to
evaluate counterparty credit risk. FCMs function, in turn, as
intermediaries between market participants and a clearing house.
In effect, the clearing house takes on the counterparty credit
risk of the FCM, and the FCM assumes the credit risk of each of
its client market participants, which is partially offset by
capital held by the FCM with respect to each of its client
market participants.
The
OTC Market
Over-the-counter, or OTC, is a term used to describe trading
activity that does not take place on a regulated exchange
through listed contracts. In this market, commercial market
participants have historically entered into negotiated,
bilateral contracts, although in recent years participants have
begun to take advantage of cleared OTC contracts that, like
futures contracts, are standardized and cleared through a
central clearing house.
In contrast to the limited number of futures contracts available
for trading on regulated exchanges, participants in the OTC
markets have the ability to trade both standardized and
customized contracts, where counterparties can specify contract
terms, such as the underlying commodity, delivery date and
location, term and contract size. Furthermore, while exchanges
typically limit their hours of operation and restrict direct
trading access to a limited number of exchange members, OTC
markets operate virtually around the clock and do not impose
membership requirements. Our electronic OTC markets operate
seven days a week for 23 hours per day.
35
Financially- or cash-settled OTC contracts are classified as
derivatives meaning that the contract is settled
through cash payments based on the value of the underlying
commodity, rather than through physical delivery of the
commodity. Physical contracts provide for settlement through
physical delivery of the underlying commodity. Physical
contracts may be entered into for either immediate delivery of a
commodity, in the cash or spot market, or for
delivery of a commodity at a specified time in the future, in
the forward market. Forward contract prices are
generally based on the spot market prices of the underlying
commodity, since long-term contracts evolve into short-term
contracts over time.
Several types of contracts can be traded in the OTC market,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards and Swaps: A forward contract is an
agreement between two parties to deliver or settle on a
specified quantity of an underlying asset, on a specified date,
and at a specified location. Unlike futures contracts discussed
above, forward contracts are not always standardized, but can be
negotiated on an individual basis between counterparties.
However, OTC cleared contracts are standardized contracts. Swaps
generally are contracts between the holders of two different
assets with differing risk and performance profiles in which the
risk or performance characteristics are exchanged. Swaps may be
settled against the future price of a single commodity or
against an index of commodity prices.
|
|
|
|
Differentials and Spreads: Differentials, or
basis swaps, are contracts that allow counterparties to
swap delivery (or the financial equivalent of
delivery) of a commodity between two different delivery points.
For example, trading parties may enter into a basis swap for
natural gas by swapping delivery of natural gas at the benchmark
Henry Hub for delivery at any hub in North America. This type of
contract allows market participants to hedge or speculate on
forward natural gas prices in various markets. The price of a
basis swap contract is based on the price differential of
deliveries at each hub. Spreads are the simultaneous purchase
and sale of forward contracts for different months, different
commodities or different grades of the same commodity.
|
|
|
|
Options: Options are contracts that convey to
the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to require the
seller to make or take delivery of a stated quantity of a
specified commodity at a specified price. Options may also be
cash settled, based on the difference between the market price
of the underlying commodity and the price of the commodity
specified in the option.
|
Because bilateral OTC contracts are entered into and settled on
a principal-to-principal basis, each party is exposed to
counterparty credit risk. Therefore, traditionally, OTC market
participants have relied heavily on their internal risk
management systems to monitor and mitigate counterparty credit
and performance risk. In recent years, a growing number of
markets, including ours, have begun to offer clearing for some
of the more commonly traded, standardized OTC contracts to
address the risks associated with entering into bilateral
agreements. Participants who choose to trade cleared OTC
products must have an account with a FCM.
Industry
Trends
We believe that the increasing interest in derivatives trading
is being driven primarily by the following key factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Growth in Electronic Trading: Innovations in
technology have increased the speed of communications and the
availability of information, which have enabled market
participants to access and participate in the commodities
markets more easily and quickly and less expensively. During the
last decade, the use of electronic trading has become
increasingly prevalent, and offers a number of advantages
relative to floor-based trading. These include the ability to
offer more contracts that on a floor, to increase distribution,
the benefits of the network-effect and increased speed and
transparency.
|
|
|
|
Lower Barriers to Entry for Market
Participants: The barriers to entry for trading
in derivatives have traditionally been significant, which has
limited the ability of many traders to participate in this
market. In recent years, a considerable erosion of these
barriers has occurred largely due to the availability of
electronic trading. In addition to electronic trading, other
changes in market structure contributing to lower barriers to
entry include declining exchange membership fees, use of ISVs,
and the introduction of cleared OTC contracts.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing Adoption of Energy Commodities as an Investable
Asset Class: Investors interest in
commodities as an asset class has experienced significant growth
in recent years. A number of attributes inherent to commodities
have contributed to this growth including higher volatility,
geopolitical risk, low/negative correlation with other asset
classes, asset diversification and attractive investment returns.
|
|
|
|
New Market Participants: Recent growth in
derivatives trading has been driven in part by increased
participation in derivatives markets by financial institutions,
hedge funds, proprietary trading firms and institutional
investors.
|
Available
Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 2100 RiverEdge
Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328. Our main
telephone number is
(770) 857-4700.
A copy of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as well as any future Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to such reports are, or will be, available
free of charge, on the Internet at the Companys website
(www.theice.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after
we file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC.
A copy of these filings is also available at the SECs
website (www.sec.gov). The reference to our website
address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the
information contained on the website and should not be
considered part of this report. Our reports, excluding exhibits,
are also available free of charge by mail upon written request
to our Secretary at the address listed above.
In addition, we have posted on our website the charters for our
(i) Audit Committee, (ii) Compensation Committee and
(iii) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as
well as our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Board of
Directors Governance Principles, Board Communication Policy and
Governance Hotline. We will provide a copy of these documents
without charge to stockholders upon request.
ITEM 1(A). RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as other information contained in or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we
currently believe may materially affect us. Other risks and
uncertainties that we do not presently consider to be material
or of which we are not presently aware may become important
factors that affect our company in the future. If any of the
risks discussed below actually occur, our business, financial
condition, operating results, or cash flows could be materially
adversely affected.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
We
face intense competition that could materially and adversely
affect our business. If we are not able to compete successfully,
our business will not survive.
The industry in which we operate is highly competitive and we
expect competition to intensify in the future. Our current and
prospective competitors, both domestically and internationally,
are numerous.
We currently compete with:
|
|
|
|
|
regulated futures exchanges globally that offer trading in a
variety of markets, such as the CME Group;
|
|
|
|
energy futures exchanges, such as NYMEX, European Energy
Derivatives Exchange, or Endex (formerly known as Amsterdam
Power Exchange), Nord Pool, and Powernext;
|
|
|
|
other exchanges, such as the London International Financial
Futures and Options Exchange, or LIFFE, which is part of NYSE
Euronext, and regional exchanges, such as the Tokyo Grain
Exchange and the Brazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange,
which provide trade execution in futures and options contracts
on agricultural products such as sugar, coffee, canola and cocoa;
|
|
|
|
voice brokers active in the global commodities markets;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
other electronic energy trading platforms for OTC markets, such
as NYMEX Clearport and Houston Street;
|
|
|
|
other clearing houses, including LCH.Clearnet, which presently
clears futures trades for ICE Futures Europe and ICEs OTC
contracts;
|
|
|
|
market data and information vendors, such as Bloomberg, Reuters,
Argus and Platts; and
|
|
|
|
possible consortiums of customers and the above listed
competitors that may pool their various competitive advantages
to establish a new exchange or trading platform.
|
The global derivatives industry has grown more competitive due
to increasing consolidation and evolving markets. We may also
face additional competition from new entrants to our markets.
Competition in the market for derivatives trading has
intensified in connection with the increase in electronic
trading platforms. Competition will intensify if more exchanges
are established, or if existing platforms or exchanges that
currently do not trade commodities products decide to do so.
Additional competition from new entrants to our markets could
negatively impact our trading volumes and profitability.
In addition, some of the exchanges, trading systems, dealers and
other companies with which we currently or in the future may
compete are or may be substantially larger than us and have or
may have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing,
personnel and other resources and more diverse revenue streams
than we do. Some of these exchanges and other businesses have
long-standing, well-established and, in some cases, dominant
positions in their existing markets. They may offer a broader
range of products and services and may take better advantage of
business opportunities than we do.
Our ability to continually remain competitive with stronger
current and potential competitors will have a direct impact on
our results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to compete effectively. If our markets, products and
services are not competitive, our business, financial condition
and operating results will be materially affected. Our business
could also be materially affected if we fail to attract new
customers or lose a substantial number of our current customers
to competitors. In addition, even if new entrants or existing
competitors do not significantly erode our market share, we may
be required to reduce significantly the rates we charge for
trade execution for certain contracts or market data to remain
competitive, which could have a material adverse effect on our
profitability.
One of our principal competitors is NYMEX, a regulated futures
exchange that offers trading in futures products and options on
those futures in the crude oil, gas and metals markets, among
other commodities markets that compete directly with some of our
contracts. NYMEX has an agreement with CME under which CME
exclusively lists NYMEX energy contracts on its electronic
trading platform. In addition, on January 28, 2008, CME and
NYMEX announced that they are in discussions regarding
CMEs potential acquisition of NYMEX. NYMEXs
electronic trading volume has surpassed the volume on its open
outcry trading floor, which may increase the competition for
trading in our electronic platform and negatively impact our
trading volume and the liquidity in our markets.
Our
business is primarily transaction-based, and declines in trading
volumes and market liquidity would adversely affect our business
and profitability.
We earn transaction fees for transactions executed in our
markets and from the provision of electronic trade confirmation
services. We derived 85.4%, 87.2% and 87.9% of our consolidated
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively, from our transaction-based business.
The success of our business depends on our ability to maintain
and increase our trading volumes and the resulting transaction
fees. Any decline in our trading volumes in the short-term or
long-term will negatively impact our transaction fees and,
therefore, our revenues. Accordingly, the occurrence of any
event that reduces the amount of transaction fees we receive,
which may result from declines in trading volumes or market
liquidity, our decision to close the trading floor for futures
contracts at the end of February 2008 for ICE Futures
U.S.s core soft agricultural commodity contracts,
reductions in commission rates, regulatory changes,
38
rebates to customers, competition or otherwise, will have a
significant impact on our operating results and profitability.
Our
business depends in large part on volatility in commodity prices
generally and energy prices in particular.
Participants in the markets for energy, soft agricultural and
agricultural commodities trading pursue a range of trading
strategies. While some participants trade in order to satisfy
physical consumption needs, others seek to hedge contractual
price risk or take speculative or arbitrage positions, seeking
returns from price movements in different markets. Trading
volume is driven primarily by the degree of
volatility the magnitude and frequency of
fluctuations in prices of commodities. Volatility
increases the need to hedge contractual price risk and creates
opportunities for speculative or arbitrage trading. Commodities
markets historically have experienced significant price
volatility and in recent years reached record levels. We cannot
predict whether this pattern will continue, or for how long, or
if this trend will reverse itself. Were there to be a sustained
period of stability in the prices of commodities, we could
experience lower trading volumes, slower growth or even declines
in revenues.
In addition to price volatility, the increase in global energy
prices, particularly for crude oil, during the past several
years may have had a positive impact on the trading volume of
global energy commodities, including trading volumes in our
markets. If global crude oil prices decrease or return to the
lower levels where they historically have been, it is possible
that many market participants could reduce their trading
activity or leave the trading markets altogether. Global energy
prices are determined by many factors, including those listed
below, which are beyond our control and are unpredictable.
Consequently, we cannot predict whether global energy prices
will remain at their current levels, and we cannot predict the
impact that these prices will have on our future revenues or
profitability.
Factors that are particularly likely to affect price volatility
and price levels, and thus trading volumes, include:
|
|
|
|
|
economic, political and market conditions in the United States,
Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere in the world;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions, including hurricanes and other significant
weather events, that impact the production of commodities, and,
in the case of energy commodities, production, refining and
distribution facilities for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
the volatility in production volume of the commodities
underlying our energy, soft agricultural and agricultural
products and markets;
|
|
|
|
war and acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes;
|
|
|
|
credit quality of market participants;
|
|
|
|
the availability of capital;
|
|
|
|
broad trends in industry and finance, including the
consolidation in our industry;
|
|
|
|
the level and volatility of interest rates;
|
|
|
|
fluctuating exchange rates and currency values; and
|
|
|
|
concerns over inflation.
|
Any one or more of these factors may reduce price volatility or
price levels in the markets for derivatives trading generally
and for commodity products in particular. Any reduction in price
volatility or price levels could reduce trading activity in
those markets, including in our markets. Moreover, any reduction
in trading activity could reduce liquidity the
ability to find ready buyers and sellers at current
prices which in turn could further discourage
existing and potential market participants and thus accelerate
any decline in the level
39
of trading activity in these markets. In these circumstances,
the markets with the highest trading volumes, and therefore the
most liquidity, would likely have a growing competitive
advantage over other markets. This could put us at a greater
disadvantage relative to our principal competitor and other
competitors, whose markets are larger and more established than
ours.
We cannot predict whether or when these unfavorable conditions
may arise in the future or, if they occur, how long or severely
they will affect trading volumes. A significant decline in our
trading volumes due to reduced volatility, lower prices or any
other factor, could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues since our transaction fees would decline and on our
profitability since our revenues would decline faster than our
expenses, some of which are fixed. Moreover, if these
unfavorable conditions were to persist over a lengthy period of
time and trading volumes were to decline substantially and for a
long enough period, the liquidity of our markets, and the
critical mass of transaction volume necessary to support viable
markets, could be jeopardized.
Our
revenues have depended heavily upon trading volume in the
markets for ICE Brent Crude, ICE WTI Crude and ICE Gas Oil
futures contracts, and OTC North American natural gas and power
contracts. In addition, with the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S.
in January 2007, sugar futures and options on sugar futures
contracts have added to ICEs trading volumes. A decline in
volume or in our market share in these contracts would
jeopardize our ability to remain profitable and
grow.
Our revenues currently depend heavily on trading volume in the
markets for ICE Brent Crude futures contracts, ICE WTI Crude
futures contract, ICE Gas Oil futures contracts, sugar futures
and options on sugar futures contracts, OTC North American
natural gas contracts and OTC North American power contracts.
Trading in these contracts in the aggregate has represented
73.0% of our consolidated revenues for the most recent annual
period.
Our trading volume or market share in these markets may decline
due to a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
development of competing contracts, and competition generally;
|
|
|
|
reliance on technology to conduct trading;
|
|
|
|
the relative stability of commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
reduced growth in mature commodity markets;
|
|
|
|
increased availability of electronic trading on competing
contracts;
|
|
|
|
possible regulatory changes; and
|
|
|
|
adverse publicity and government investigations.
|
A decline in trading volume would have a negative impact on our
operating results and profitability.
A
decline in the production of commodities traded in our markets
could reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our revenues and
profitability.
We derived 84.3%, 86.1% and 86.9% of our consolidated revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, from exchange fees and commission fees generated
from trading in commodity products in our futures and OTC
markets. The volume of contracts traded in the futures and OTC
markets for any specific commodity tends to be a multiple of the
physical production of that commodity. If the physical supply or
production of any commodity declines, market participants could
become less willing to trade in contracts based on that
commodity. For example, ICE Brent Crude futures contract has
been subject to this risk as production of Brent crude oil
peaked in 1984 and began steadily falling in subsequent years.
We, in consultation with market participants, altered the
mechanism for settlement of ICE Brent Crude futures contract to
a mechanism based on the Brent/Forties/Oseberg North Sea oil
fields, known as the BFO Index, to ensure that the commodity
prices on which its settlement price is based reflect a large
enough pool of traders and trading activity so as to be less
susceptible to manipulation. Market participants that trade in
ICE Brent
40
Crude futures contract may determine in the future, however,
that additional underlying commodity products need to be
considered in the settlement of that contract or that the
settlement mechanism is not credible.
Exchange fees earned from trading in ICE Brent Crude futures
contract accounted for 47.6%, 50.5% and 68.8% of our total
revenues from our energy futures business, net of intersegment
fees, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, or 15.2%, 20.4% and 26.5% of our consolidated
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Any uncertainty concerning the settlement of
ICE Brent Crude futures contract, or a decline in the physical
supply or production of any other commodity on which our trading
products are based could result in a decline in trading volumes
in our markets, adversely affecting our revenues and
profitability.
In
connection with our strategy to form a wholly-owned European
clearing house, we served notice to terminate our clearing
arrangements with LCH.Clearnet, which currently provides
clearing services for the trading of certain futures and cleared
OTC contracts in our markets. We cannot offer our futures and
cleared OTC products without clearing services, and any delay in
commencing our European clearing operations at ICE Clear Europe
could result in a disruption to our business or materially and
adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
On July 18, 2007, we provided LCH.Clearnet with written
notice of our intent to terminate our contractual arrangements
pursuant to which LCH.Clearnet currently provides clearing
services to us for all energy futures contracts and cleared OTC
contracts traded in our markets. As provided in our notice of
termination, these services will terminate on a mutually agreed
upon date or in July 2008.
As previously announced, we intend to expand our clearing
operations globally by establishing a wholly-owned clearing
house in Europe, to be named ICE Clear Europe, through which we
intend to clear our energy futures contracts and cleared OTC
contracts. The successful establishment of ICE Clear Europe is
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including
obtaining appropriate regulatory approvals in the U.K., building
out or procuring appropriate clearing house technology and
integrating that technology with ICE Futures Europe and our OTC
business, and ultimately the acceptance of the clearing house by
FCMs and our trading participants who will be the users of the
clearing house. In addition, our competitors, who for this
purpose would include LCH.Clearnet, may attempt to interfere
with the transition of clearing to ICE Clear Europe or take
advantage of any issues or delays that occur with the clearing
transition. In particular, LCH.Clearnet may breach its clearing
services agreements with us or attempt to legally challenge
portions of the clearing services agreements that we believe
obligate LCH.Clearnet to refrain from amalgamating, transferring
or permitting credit offset for margin purposes with respect to
our contracts or they may attempt to interfere with the
transition of customer business to a new clearing house.
Further, we may be forced to seek legal action against
LCH.Clearnet to enforce our rights under the clearing services
agreements, which may disrupt our plans for providing clearing
services.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain regulatory
approval for ICE Clear Europe, that we will execute our business
plan in a timely manner or that there will be no issues, whether
operationally or due to the actions of competitors, with the
transition of clearing to ICE Clear Europe. If our clearing
services are delayed, suspended or interrupted, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be
materially and adversely affected. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, transaction fees
generated by our U.K. futures business, which are also referred
to as exchange fees, accounted for 31.1%, 39.3% and 36.7%,
respectively, of our consolidated revenues.
In addition, if ICE Clear Europe, or our existing clearing
operations at ICE Clear U.S. or ICE Clear Canada, are not
able to provide clearing services relating to our OTC business
following the termination of our agreements with LCH.Clearnet,
we may be unable to offer clearing services in connection with
trading certain OTC contracts in our markets for a considerable
period of time. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005, transaction fees derived from trading in cleared OTC
contracts accounted for 29.2%, 38.6% and 37.5%, respectively, of
our consolidated revenues. Our cleared OTC contracts have been a
significant component of our business, and accounted for 69.3%,
71.8% and 69.3% of revenues, net of the
41
intersegment fees, generated by our OTC business for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Legislation
or regulatory changes preventing clearing facilities from being
owned or controlled by exchanges may limit or stop our ability
to run a clearing house.
Many clearing firms have emphasized the importance to them of
centralizing clearing of futures contracts and options on
futures in order to maximize the efficient use of their capital,
exercise greater control over their value at risk and extract
greater operating leverage from clearing activities. Many have
expressed the view that clearing firms should have a choice of
where to clear their transactions or should control the
governance of clearing houses. In addition, some clearing firms
have expressed the view that multiple clearing houses should be
consolidated and operated as utilities rather than as for-profit
enterprises. Some of these firms, along with the Futures
Industry Association and UK Futures and Options Associations,
are attempting to cause legislative or regulatory changes to be
adopted that would allow market participants to transfer
positions from an exchange-owned clearing house (such as
ICEClear Europe) to a clearing house owned and controlled by
clearing firms. Some market participants, including the UK
Futures and Options Association, have expressed support for
extending the European Union Code of Clearing and Conduct to
derivatives, which would mandate clearing choice for customers
through interoperability. In addition, the U.S. Department
of Justice released comments on February 7, 2008 requesting
the U.S. Department of Treasury to review futures markets
to determine if a different regime for clearing is feasible,
which could include ending exchange control of financial futures
clearing to foster exchange competition. The Department of
Justice comments specifically excluded markets for commodities
futures, such as energy futures markets. If these legislative or
regulatory changes are adopted, alternative clearing houses may
seek to clear positions established on our exchanges. Even if
they are not successful in their efforts, the factors described
above may cause clearing firms to limit the use of our clearing
houses. If any of these events occur, our revenues and profits
would be materially and adversely affected.
Owning
clearing houses exposes us to risks, including risks related to
the cost of operating the clearing houses and the risk of
defaults by our participants clearing trades through our
clearing houses.
Operating clearing houses requires material ongoing expenditures
and may consume a significant portion of managements time.
We cannot assure you that our participants will migrate their
business from LCH.Clearnet to ICE Clear Europe. In addition, we
cannot assure you that our clearing arrangements will be
satisfactory to our participants or will not require additional
substantial system modifications to accommodate them in the
future. The transition to new clearing facilities for many of
our participants could be disruptive and costly. Our operation
of clearing houses may not be as successful and may not provide
us the benefits we anticipate. In addition, our operation of
these clearing houses may not generate sufficient revenues to
cover the expenses we incur.
There are risks inherent in operating a clearing house,
including exposure to the credit risk of clearing members and
defaults by clearing members, which could subject our business
to substantial losses. Although our clearing houses have
policies and procedures to help ensure that clearing members can
satisfy their obligations (and ICE Clear Europe will adopt
comparable policies and procedures), such policies and
procedures may not succeed in preventing defaults. We also have
in place or plan to establish, as appropriate, various measures
intended to enable our clearing houses to cover any default and
maintain liquidity, such as deposits in a guaranty fund.
However, we cannot assure you that these measures and safeguards
will be sufficient to protect us from a default or that we will
not be materially and adversely affected in the event of a
significant default. Additionally, the default of any one of the
clearing members could cause our customers to lose confidence in
the guarantee of our clearing houses, which would have an
adverse affect on our business.
42
Currently,
we continue to rely on LCH.Clearnet to provide clearing services
for the trading of certain futures and cleared OTC contracts in
our markets despite owning ICE Clear U.S., ICE Clear Canada and
forming ICE Clear Europe. We cannot operate our futures and
cleared OTC businesses without clearing services.
The termination of the contract with LCH.Clearnet will take
effect at the end of the exit phase, which is currently expected
to be in July 2008. Currently, we continue to rely on
LCH.Clearnet to provide clearing services to us for all energy
futures contracts traded in our markets.
ICE Clear U.S. will continue to serve as the designated
clearing house for trades executed at ICE Futures U.S. and
ICE Clear Canada will continue to provide clearing service for
trades executed at ICE Futures Canada. ICE Clear U.S. is
seeking recognition from the FSA to be allowed to provide
clearing services in the United Kingdom, for an exchange like
ICE Futures Europe. ICE Clear Canada is not currently authorized
by United Kingdom regulators to clear transactions executed on
an exchange located in the United Kingdom. Consequently, these
clearing houses are not currently able to clear trades in the
United Kingdom until they obtain such recognition, which could
take considerable time and resources, but they may offer certain
clearing services as an overseas person under United
Kingdom laws. There is no assurance that such recognition will
be granted.
If our clearing services are suspended or interrupted and we are
unable to provide clearing services to our customers through an
alternate provider on a timely basis, our business, financial
condition and results of operations would be materially and
adversely affected. If ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada
could not provide clearing services for our energy futures or
OTC products, we could not obtain clearing services from an
alternate provider, or ICE Clear Europe was unable to provide
such services, we may be unable to operate certain of our energy
futures and OTC markets and would possibly be required to cease
operations in those segments of our business. We cannot assure
you that our energy futures or OTC businesses would be able to
obtain clearing services from ICE Clear U.S. or ICE Clear
Canada, an alternate provider or ICE Clear Europe in sufficient
time to avoid or mitigate the material adverse effects described
above and, in the case of an alternate provider, on acceptable
terms.
We
intend to explore acquisition opportunities and strategic
alliances relating to other businesses, products or
technologies. We may not be successful in identifying
opportunities or integrating other businesses, products or
technologies successfully with our business. Any such
transaction also may not produce the results we
anticipate.
We intend to continue to explore and pursue acquisition
opportunities to strengthen our business and grow our company.
We may enter into business combination transactions, make
acquisitions or enter into strategic partnerships, joint
ventures or alliances, any of which may be material. We may
enter into these transactions to acquire other businesses,
products or technologies to expand our products and services,
advance our technology or take advantage of new developments and
potential changes in the industry.
The market for acquisition targets and strategic alliances is
highly competitive, particularly in light of increasing
consolidation in the exchange sector. As a result, we may be
unable to identify strategic opportunities or we may be unable
to negotiate or finance any future acquisition successfully.
Further, our competitors could merge, making it more difficult
for us to find appropriate entities to acquire or merge with and
making it more difficult to compete in our industry due to the
increased resources of our merged competitors. For example, on
January 28, 2008, CME and NYMEX announced that they are in
discussions regarding CMEs potential acquisition of NYMEX.
The process of integration may produce unforeseen regulatory and
operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert the
attention of management from the ongoing operation of our
business. Further, as a result of any future acquisition, we may
issue additional shares of our common stock that dilute
shareholders ownership interest in us, expend cash, incur debt,
assume contingent liabilities or create additional expenses
related to amortizing intangible assets with estimable useful
lives, any of which could harm our business, financial condition
or results of operations and negatively impact our stock price.
43
We may
fail to realize the anticipated cost savings, growth
opportunities and synergies and other benefits anticipated from
our mergers and acquisitions, which could adversely affect the
value of our common stock.
We completed multiple acquisitions in 2007, including
transactions with NYBOT (ICE Futures U.S.), Winnipeg Commodity
Exchange, Inc. (ICE Futures Canada), Chatham Energy Partners,
LLC, ChemConnect Inc., and Commoditrack, Inc (ICE Risk). The
success of our mergers and acquisitions will depend, in part, on
our ability to realize the anticipated synergies and growth
opportunities from combining the businesses, as well as our
expected cost savings and revenue growth trends. In general, we
expect to benefit from operational synergies resulting from the
consolidation of capabilities and elimination of redundancies in
our mergers and acquisitions. If we fail to successfully
integrate an acquired business, or if the reason we acquired the
business is materially impacted, we may be required to take an
impairment charge on our financial statements, which could
negatively impact our stock price.
With respect to the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition, we expect
continued operational synergies from the use of ICE Futures
U.S.s clearing technology, as well as greater efficiencies
from increased scale, market integration and increased
automation. Management also expects the combined entity will
enjoy revenue synergies, including additional clearing
alternatives; expense sharing; increased access, volume and
liquidity to the products traded on our respective markets; and
expanded product offerings and increased geographic reach.
Integration of companies acquired by us is complex and time
consuming, and requires substantial resources and effort. We
must successfully combine the businesses in a manner that
permits the expected cost savings and synergies to be realized.
In addition, we must achieve the anticipated savings and
synergies without adversely affecting current revenues and our
investments in future growth. The integration process and other
disruptions resulting from the mergers or acquisitions may also
disrupt each companys ongoing businesses or cause
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies
that adversely affect our relationships with market
participants, employees, regulators and others with whom we have
business or other dealings or our ability to achieve the
anticipated benefits of the merger or acquisition. In addition,
difficulties in integrating the businesses or any negative
impact on the regulatory functions of any of our companies could
harm the reputation of the companies. We may not successfully
achieve the integration objectives, and we may not realize the
anticipated cost savings, revenue growth and synergies in full
or at all, or it may take longer to realize them than expected.
We are
currently subject to regulation in multiple jurisdictions.
Failure to comply with existing regulatory requirements, and
possible future changes in these requirements or in the current
interpretation of these requirements, could adversely affect our
business.
ICE Futures Europe, through which we conduct our energy futures
business, operates as a Recognized Investment Exchange in the
United Kingdom. As a Recognized Investment Exchange, ICE Futures
Europe has regulatory responsibility in its own right and is
subject to supervision by the FSA pursuant to the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA. ICE Futures Europe is
required under the FSMA to maintain sufficient financial
resources, adequate systems and controls and effective
arrangements for monitoring and disciplining its members.
Likewise, ICE Futures U.S. operates as a Designated
Contract Market. As a self-regulatory organization, it is
responsible for ensuring that the exchange operates in
accordance with existing rules and regulations, and must comply
with eighteen core principles under the CEA. The ability of ICE
Futures Europe and ICE Futures U.S. to comply with all
applicable laws and rules is largely dependent on its
maintenance of compliance, audit and reporting systems. We
cannot assure you that these systems and procedures are fully
effective. Failure to comply with current regulatory
requirements and regulatory requirements that may be imposed on
us in the future could subject us to significant penalties,
including termination of our ability to conduct our regulated
energy futures business conducted through ICE Futures Europe and
our regulated soft commodities business through ICE Futures U.S.
Electronic trading in our energy futures contracts on ICE
Futures Europe is permitted in many jurisdictions, including in
the United States, through no-action relief from the
local jurisdictions regulatory requirements. In the United
States, direct electronic access to trading in ICE Futures
Europe products is
44
offered to U.S. persons based on a series of no-action
letters from the CFTC that permit
non-U.S. exchanges,
referred to as foreign boards of trade, to provide
U.S. persons with electronic access to their markets
without registration with the CFTC. Our ability to offer new
futures products under our existing no-action relief could be
impacted by any actions taken by the CFTC as a result of future
conditions being imposed on ICE Futures Europe under its
no-action relief. If our offering of products through ICE
Futures Europe to U.S. participants is subject to
additional regulatory constraints, our business could be
adversely affected. Similarly, electronic trading in ICE Futures
U.S. contracts is permitted in many jurisdictions through
no-action relief from the local jurisdictions
regulatory requirements. With the proposed end of open outcry
trading of ICE Futures U.S. futures contracts scheduled for
February 2008, the ability of ICE Futures U.S. to offer
trading in futures products in multiple jurisdictions will be
dependent upon its ability to comply with the existing
conditions of its no-action relief in various jurisdictions and
any new conditions that may be added.
New regulations or enforcement may force us to allocate more
resources to regulation or confidence in our markets may be
diminished and our business may be adversely affected. Even the
perception of unfairness or illegal behavior in our markets
could adversely affect our business. In addition, the recent
demise of certain hedge funds that traded energy commodities may
result in additional regulation by the CFTC or Congress.
Legislative and regulatory initiatives, either in the United
States, the United Kingdom or elsewhere, could affect one or
more of the following aspects of our business or impose one or
more of the following requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which we communicate with and contract with our
participants;
|
|
|
|
the demand for and pricing of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the tax treatment of trading in our products;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we maintain minimum regulatory capital on
hand;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we exercise regulatory oversight of our OTC
participants, and assume responsibility for their conduct;
|
|
|
|
our financial and regulatory reporting practices;
|
|
|
|
our record-keeping and record-retention procedures;
|
|
|
|
the licensing of our employees; and
|
|
|
|
the conduct of our directors, officers, employees and affiliates.
|
The implementation of new regulations, or changes in or
unfavorable interpretations of existing regulations by courts or
regulatory bodies could require us to incur significant
compliance costs and impede our ability to operate, expand and
enhance our electronic platform as necessary to remain
competitive and expand our business. Regulatory changes inside
or outside the United States or the United Kingdom could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The
nature and role of ICE Futures U.S.s self-regulatory
responsibilities may change.
Some financial services regulators have publicly stated their
interest in evaluating the ability of a financial exchange,
organized as a for-profit corporation, to adequately discharge
its self-regulatory responsibilities. ICE Futures U.S.s
regulatory programs and capabilities contribute significantly to
its brand name and reputation. We cannot assure you that ICE
Futures U.S. will not be required to further modify or
restructure its corporate governance or regulatory functions in
order to address these or other concerns. For example, the CFTC
adopted, but recently stayed implementation of, final rules to
minimize conflicts of interest on Boards of Directors of
registered, futures exchanges, or designated contract markets.
The new rules provided a safe harbor to designated contract
markets that had at least 35% of their board of directors
comprised of persons with no material relationship to the
designated contract market or its members and were deemed to be
public directors. While the rules regarding
conflicts of interest that were stayed would not likely result
in costly or burdensome changes at ICE Futures U.S.,
implementation of such rules could alter the composition of ICE
45
Futures U.S.s Board of Directors if implemented. Any
future new rules, modifications of existing rules or
restructuring of regulatory functions could entail material
costs.
The
energy commodities trading industry in North America has been
subject to increased regulatory scrutiny in the recent past, and
we face the risk of changes to our regulatory environment in the
future, which may diminish trading volumes on our electronic
platform.
We currently operate our OTC markets as an exempt
commercial market under the CEA. As such, our markets are
subject to anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, access, reporting and
record-keeping requirements of the CFTC. However, unlike a
futures exchange, ICE is not itself a self regulatory
organization that undertakes active regulatory oversight of OTC
trading. In December, the United States Senate and the United
States House of Representatives each passed legislation to
increase regulation of OTC markets, and in particular to require
active oversight of certain contracts traded on exempt
commercial markets that are deemed by the CFTC to be
significant price discovery contracts. Both bills
require OTC electronic trading facilities to assume self
regulatory responsibilities, such as market monitoring and
establishing position limits or accountability limits, over
contracts that serve a significant price discovery function. If
adopted, this legislation would require us and our OTC
participants to operate under heightened regulatory burdens and
incur additional costs, including recordkeeping and reporting
costs, to comply with the additional regulations, and could
deter some participants from trading on our OTC platform.
Presently, we anticipate that our OTC Henry Hub natural gas
contract, which comprised 73.4%, 81.6%, and 76.5% of our OTC
transaction volumes in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, would
be considered a significant price discovery contract.
In addition, the market for OTC energy commodities trading has
been the subject of increased scrutiny by regulatory and
enforcement authorities due to a number of highly publicized
incidents alleging manipulative trading activity by certain
entities and the failure of several hedge funds.
Furthermore, in response to the rise in energy commodity prices
in recent years and allegations that manipulative trading
practices by certain market participants may have contributed to
the rise in prices, legislative and regulatory authorities at
both the federal and state levels, as well as political and
consumer groups, have called for increased regulation and
monitoring of the OTC energy commodities markets and a review of
the no-action process pursuant to which ICE Futures
contracts are presently offered to market participants in the
United States.
It is possible that future unanticipated events in the markets
for energy commodities trading will lead to additional
regulatory scrutiny and changes in the level of regulation to
which we are subject. Increased regulation of our participants
or our markets could materially adversely affect our business.
The imposition of stabilizing measures such as price controls in
energy commodities markets could substantially reduce or
potentially even eliminate trading activity in affected markets.
New laws and rules applicable to us could significantly increase
our regulatory compliance costs, delay or prevent us from
introducing new products and services as planned and discourage
some market participants from using our electronic platform.
Allegations of manipulative trading by market participants or
additional failures of hedge funds could subject us to
regulatory scrutiny and possibly fines or restrictions on our
business, as well as significant legal expenses and adverse
publicity. All of this could lead to lower trading volumes,
liquidity and transaction fees, higher operating costs and lower
profitability or losses.
If we
are unable to keep up with rapid changes in technology and
participant preferences, we may not be able to compete
effectively.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve
the responsiveness, functionality, accessibility and reliability
of our electronic platform and our proprietary technology. The
financial services industry is characterized by rapid
technological change, change in use patterns, change in client
preferences, frequent product and service introductions and the
emergence of new industry standards and practices. These changes
could render our existing proprietary technology uncompetitive
or obsolete. Our ability to pursue our
46
strategic objectives, including increasing trading volumes on
our trading platforms, as well as our ability to continue to
grow our business, will depend, in part, on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our existing services and maintain and improve the
functionality and reliability of our electronic platform, in
particular, reducing network downtime or disruptions;
|
|
|
|
develop or license new technologies that address the
increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our participants;
|
|
|
|
anticipate and respond to technological advances and emerging
industry practices on a cost-effective and timely basis; and
|
|
|
|
continue to attract and retain highly skilled technology staff
to maintain and develop our existing technology and to adapt to
and manage emerging technologies while attempting to keep our
employee headcount low.
|
We cannot assure you that we will successfully implement new
technologies or adapt our proprietary technology to our
participants requirements or emerging industry standards
in a timely and cost-effective manner. Any failure to remain
abreast of industry standards in technology and to be responsive
to participant preferences could cause our market share to
decline and negatively impact our profitability.
Our
operating results may be subject to significant fluctuations due
to a number of factors.
A number of factors beyond our control may contribute to
substantial fluctuations in our operating results. As a result
of the factors described in the preceding risk factors, you will
not be able to rely on our historical operating results in any
particular period as an indication of our future performance.
The commodities trading industry, and energy commodities trading
in particular, has historically been subject to variability in
trading volumes due primarily to five key factors. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
geopolitical events,
|
|
|
|
weather,
|
|
|
|
real and perceived supply and demand imbalances in the
underlying commodities,
|
|
|
|
the number of trading days in a quarter, and
|
|
|
|
seasonality.
|
As a result of one or more of these factors, trading volumes in
our markets could decline, possibly significantly, which would
adversely affect our revenues derived from transaction fees. If
we fail to meet securities analysts expectations regarding
our operating performance, the price of our common stock could
decline substantially.
Our
cost structure is largely fixed in the short-term period. If our
revenues decline and we are unable to reduce our costs, or if
our expenses increase without a corresponding increase in
revenues, our profitability will be adversely
affected.
Our cost structure is largely fixed and we expect that it will
continue to be largely fixed. We base our expectations of our
cost structure on historical and expected levels of demand for
our products and services as well as our fixed operating
infrastructure, such as computer hardware and software, leases,
hosting facilities and security and staffing levels. If demand
for our products and services declines and, as a result, our
revenues decline, we may not be able to adjust our cost
structure on a timely basis. In that event, our profitability
will be adversely affected.
Fluctuations
in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our operating
results.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of ICE Futures
Europe and other U.K. subsidiaries have historically been
denominated in pounds sterling, which was the functional
currency of our U.K. subsidiaries. As a result, we had foreign
currency translation risk equal to our net investment in our
U.K. subsidiaries. The
47
financial statements of our U.K. subsidiaries were translated
into U.S. dollars using current rates of exchange, with
gains or losses included in the cumulative translation
adjustment account, a component of shareholders equity.
Effective as of July 1, 2006, the functional currency of
the majority of our U.K. subsidiaries became the
U.S. dollar. The decision to change the functional currency
of these entities was based on various economic factors and
circumstances, including the fact that beginning in the second
quarter of 2006, ICE Futures Europe began to charge and collect
exchange fees in U.S. dollars rather than pounds sterling
in its key futures contracts, including crude oil and heating
oil contracts. The functional currency of an entity is the
currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates. We will no longer recognize any translation
adjustments relating to those U.K. subsidiaries that have
switched their functional currency to the U.S. dollar.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of ICE Futures
Canada and other Canadian subsidiaries are denominated in
Canadian dollars. We have foreign currency translation risk
equal to our net investment in our Canadian subsidiaries. The
financial statements of our Canadian subsidiaries were
translated into U.S. dollars using current rates of
exchange, with gains or losses included in the cumulative
translation adjustment account, a component of
shareholders equity. As of December 31, 2007, the
portion of our shareholders equity attributable to
accumulated other comprehensive income from foreign currency
translation was $33.0 million. The period-end foreign
currency exchange rate for the Canadian dollar to the
U.S. dollar increased from 1.0515 as of August 27,
2007, the acquisition date of ICE Futures Canada, to 0.9881 as
of December 31, 2007.
We have foreign currency transaction risk primarily related to
the settlement of certain foreign assets, liabilities and
payables that occur through our foreign operations which are
received in or paid in pounds sterling. We had foreign currency
transaction gains (losses) of $842,000, ($288,000) and
$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily attributable to the
fluctuations of pounds sterling relative to the
U.S. dollar. The average exchange rate of pounds sterling
to the U.S. dollar increased from 1.8434 for the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 2.0020 for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
We may experience substantial gains or losses from foreign
currency transactions in the future given that there are still
certain net assets or net liabilities and expenses of our
subsidiaries that are denominated in pounds sterling and
Canadian dollars. Of our consolidated operating expenses, 15.2%,
29.8% and 48.1% were denominated in pounds sterling for the year
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As
the pounds sterling exchange rate changes, the
U.S. equivalent of expenses denominated in foreign
currencies changes accordingly. All sales in our business are
denominated in U.S. dollars, except for some small futures
contracts in our futures business segment. Our U.K. operations
in some instances function as a natural hedge because we
generally hold an equal amount of monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in pounds sterling.
While we may enter into hedging transactions in the future to
help mitigate our foreign exchange risk exposure, these hedging
arrangements may not be effective, particularly in the event of
imprecise forecasts of the levels of our
non-U.S. denominated
assets and liabilities. Accordingly, if there is an adverse
movement in exchange rates, we may suffer significant losses,
which would adversely affect our operating results and financial
condition.
Any
infringement by us of intellectual property rights of others
could result in litigation and adversely affect our ability to
continue to provide, or increase the cost of providing, our
products and services.
Patents and other intellectual property rights are increasingly
important as further electronic components are added to trading,
and patents and other intellectual property rights of third
parties may have an important bearing on our ability to offer
certain of our products and services. Our competitors, as well
as other companies and individuals, may have obtained, and may
be expected to obtain in the future, patent rights related to
the types of products and services we offer or plan to offer. We
cannot assure you that we are or will be aware of all patents
that may pose a risk of infringement by our products and
services. In addition, some patent applications in the United
States are confidential until a patent is issued, and therefore
we cannot evaluate the extent to which our products and services
may be covered or asserted to be covered in pending
48
patent applications. Thus, we cannot be sure that our products
and services do not infringe on the rights of others or that
others will not make claims of infringement against us.
In addition, our competitors may claim other intellectual
property rights over information that is used by us in our
product offerings. For example, in November 2002, NYMEX filed
claims against us in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York asserting that, among other
things, it infringed copyrights NYMEX claims exist in its
publicly available settlement prices that we use in connection
with the clearing of certain OTC derivative contracts. The court
granted a motion for summary judgment in our favor in September
2005 dismissing all claims brought against us by NYMEX. NYMEX
appealed the ruling of the District Court to the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals, and the Court of Appeals Affirmed the ruling
of the District Court by decision on August 1, 2007. On
August 15, 2007, NYMEX filed a Combined Petition for Panel
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, requesting that the case be
reheard before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On
October 25, 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
denied NYMEXs Combined Petition for a rehearing. On
January 16, 2008, NYMEX filed a writ of certiorari with the
U.S. Supreme Court seeking discretionary review of the
case, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided
whether to hear the case. Should NYMEX be successful in its
appeal to the Supreme Court and we are subsequently found to
have infringed NYMEXs intellectual property rights, we may
incur substantial monetary damages and may be enjoined from
using or referring to one or more types of NYMEX settlement
prices. If we are so enjoined, we could lose all or a
substantial portion of our cleared trading volume in Henry Hub
natural gas and WTI crude oil contracts and the related
commission revenues. Our OTC Henry Hub natural gas contract
comprised 35.0%, 47.8%, and 45.6% of our total transaction
volumes in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively, and our ICE
Futures Europe WTI Crude futures contract comprised 14.0% and
12.8% of our total transaction volumes in 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
With respect to our intellectual property, if one or more of our
products or services is found to infringe patents held by
others, it may be required to stop developing or marketing the
products or services, obtain licenses to develop and market the
products or services from the holders of the patents or redesign
the products or services in such a way as to avoid infringing
the patents. We also could be required to pay damages if we were
found to infringe patents held by others, which could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating
results. We cannot assess the extent to which we may be required
in the future to obtain licenses with respect to patents held by
others, whether such licenses would be available or, if
available, whether it would be able to obtain such licenses on
commercially reasonable terms. If we were unable to obtain such
licenses, we may not be able to redesign our products or
services at a reasonable cost to avoid infringement, which could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
and operating results.
Some
of the proprietary technology we employ may be vulnerable to
infringement by others.
Our business is dependent on proprietary technology and other
intellectual property that we own or license from third parties.
Despite precautions we have taken or may take to protect our
intellectual property rights, third parties could copy or
otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology without
authorization. It may be difficult for us to monitor
unauthorized use of our intellectual property. We cannot assure
you that the steps that we have taken will prevent
misappropriation of our proprietary technology or intellectual
property.
We have filed patent applications in the U.S. and in other
jurisdictions on a number of aspects of our electronic trading
system and trade confirmation systems. In addition, we have
licenses under two U.S. patents for trading electric
energy, and two joint U.S. patents with NYMEX covering an
implied market trading system. We have also filed patent
applications on certain aspects of our electronic trading and
trade confirmation systems in the European Patent Office and
Canada. We cannot assure you that we will obtain any final
patents covering these services, nor can we predict the scope of
any patents issued. In addition, we cannot assure you that any
patent issued will be effective to protect this intellectual
property against misappropriation. Third parties in Europe or
elsewhere could acquire patents covering this or other
intellectual property for which we obtain patents in the United
States, or equivalent intellectual property, as a result of
differences in local laws affecting patentability and patent
validity. Third parties in other jurisdictions might also
misappropriate our intellectual property rights with impunity if
intellectual property protection laws are
49
not actively enforced in those jurisdictions. Patent
infringement
and/or the
grant of parallel patents would erode the value of our
intellectual property.
We have secured trademark registrations for
IntercontinentalExchange and ICE from
the United States Patent and Trademark Office and from
relevant agencies in Europe, as appropriate, with
ICE also being registered in Singapore, as well as
registrations for other trademarks used in our business. We also
have several U.S. and foreign applications pending for
other trademarks used in our business. We cannot assure you that
any of these marks for which applications are pending will be
registered.
In addition, we may have to resort to litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, and
determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property
rights of others or defend ourselves from claims of
infringement. We may not receive an adequate remedy for any
infringement of our intellectual property rights, and we may
incur substantial costs and diversion of resources and the
attention of management as a result of litigation, even if we
prevail. As a result, we may choose not to enforce our infringed
intellectual property rights, depending on our strategic
evaluation and judgment regarding the best use of our resources,
the relative strength of our intellectual property portfolio and
the recourse available to us.
We
face significant challenges in implementing our strategic goals
of expanding product and service offerings and attracting new
market participants to our markets. If we do not meet these
challenges, we may not be able to increase our revenues or
remain profitable.
We seek to expand the range of derivative products that can be
traded in our markets and to ensure that trading in those new
products becomes liquid within a sufficiently short period of
time to support viable trading markets. We also seek to expand
the number of contracts traded in our futures markets. In
meeting these strategic goals, however, we face a number of
significant challenges, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to launching a new contract, we must satisfy certain
regulatory obligations, which if not satisfied could delay the
launch of the new contract.
|
|
|
|
When we expand our product offering through a merger or
acquisition, we may need to introduce the ICE trading platform
to customers that have historically conducted business by
telephone or on a different exchange. The process of
transitioning customers to our electronic platform can be time
consuming and expensive and if not ultimately accepted, could
substantially impair or render worthless the assets we acquired
through the merger or acquisition.
|
|
|
|
We must meet regulatory obligations and overcome any technical
or operational issues to successfully implement our clearing
strategy.
|
|
|
|
To expand the use of our electronic platform to additional
participants and contracts, we must continue to expand capacity
without disrupting functionality to satisfy evolving customer
requirements.
|
|
|
|
To introduce new trading-related services, we must develop
additional systems technology that will interface successfully
with the wide variety of unique internal systems used by our
participants. These challenges may involve unforeseen costs and
delays.
|
|
|
|
We must continue to build significant brand recognition among
commodities market participants in order to attract new
participants to our markets. This will require us to increase
our marketing expenditures. The cost of our marketing efforts
may be greater than we expect, and we cannot assure you that
these efforts will be successful.
|
Even if we resolve these issues and are able to introduce new
products and services, there is no assurance that they will be
accepted by our participants, attract new market participants,
or be competitive with those offered by other companies. If we
do not succeed in these efforts on a consistent, sustained
basis, we will be unable to implement our strategic objectives.
This would seriously jeopardize our ability to increase and
diversify our revenues, remain profitable and continue as a
viable competitor in our markets.
50
Reductions
in our exchange fee rates or commission rates resulting from
competitive pressures could lower our revenues and
profitability.
We may experience pressure on our exchange fee rates and
commission rates as a result of competition we face in our
futures and OTC markets. Some of our competitors offer a broader
range of products and services to a larger participant base, and
enjoy higher trading volumes, than we do. Consequently, our
competitors may be able and willing to offer commodity trading
services at lower commission rates than we currently offer or
may be able to offer. As a result of this pricing competition,
we could lose both market share and revenues. We believe that
any downward pressure on commission rates would likely continue
and intensify as we continue to develop our business and gain
recognition in our markets. A decline in commission rates could
lower our revenues, which would adversely affect our
profitability. In addition, our competitors may offer other
financial incentives such as rebates or payments in order to
induce trading in their markets, rather than in our markets.
Our
business may be harmed by computer and communications systems
failures and delays.
We support and maintain many of the systems that comprise our
electronic platform. Our failure to monitor or maintain these
systems, or to find replacements for defective components within
a system in a timely and cost-effective manner when necessary,
could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct
our business. Although we fully replicate our primary data
center, our redundant systems or disaster recovery plans may
prove to be inadequate. Our systems, or those of our third party
providers, may fail or, due to capacity constraints, may operate
slowly, causing one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated disruption in service to our participants;
|
|
|
|
slower response time and delays in our participants trade
execution and processing;
|
|
|
|
failed settlement by participants to whom we provide trade
confirmation or clearing services;
|
|
|
|
incomplete or inaccurate accounting, recording or processing of
trades;
|
|
|
|
our distribution of inaccurate or untimely market data to
participants who rely on this data in their trading
activity; and
|
|
|
|
financial loss.
|
We could experience system failures due to power or
telecommunications failures, human error on our part or on the
part of our vendors or participants, natural disasters, fire,
sabotage, hardware or software malfunctions or defects, computer
viruses, intentional acts of vandalism or terrorism and similar
events. In these instances, our disaster recovery plan may prove
ineffective. If any one or more of these situations were to
arise, they could result in damage to our business reputation,
participant dissatisfaction with our electronic platform,
prompting participants to trade elsewhere, or exposure to
litigation or regulatory sanctions. As a consequence, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could
suffer materially.
Our regulated business operations generally require that our
trade execution and communications systems be able to handle
anticipated present and future peak trading volume. Heavy use of
computer systems during peak trading times or at times of
unusual market volatility could cause those systems to operate
slowly or even to fail for periods of time. We will continue to
constantly monitor system loads and performance and regularly
implement system upgrades to handle estimated increases in
trading volume. However, we cannot assure you that our estimates
of future trading volume will be accurate or that our systems
will always be able to accommodate actual trading volume without
failure or degradation of performance.
Our
systems and those of our third party service providers may be
vulnerable to security risks, which could result in wrongful use
of our information, or which could make our participants
reluctant to use our electronic platform.
We regard the secure transmission of confidential information on
our electronic platform as a critical element of our operations.
Our networks and those of our participants and our third party
service providers,
51
may, however, be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer
viruses, firewall or encryption failures and other security
problems. We may be required to expend significant resources to
protect our business and our participants against the threat of
security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by security
breaches. Although we intend to continue to implement industry
standard security measures, we cannot assure you that those
measures will be sufficient to protect our business against
losses or any reduced trading volume incurred in our markets as
a result of any significant security breaches on our platform.
We
rely on specialized management and employees.
Our future success depends, in part, upon the continued
contributions of our executive officers and key employees whom
we rely on for executing our business strategy and identifying
new strategic initiatives. Some of these individuals have
significant experience in the commodities trading industry and
financial services markets generally, and possess extensive
technology skills. Although we have entered into employment
agreements with our executive officers, it is possible that one
or more of these persons could voluntarily terminate their
employment agreements with us. Furthermore, we have not entered
into employment agreements with non-executive personnel, who may
terminate their employment at any time. Several of these
employees have been with us since our inception and have vested
stock options. Any loss or interruption of the services of our
executive officers or other key personnel could result in our
inability to manage our operations effectively or to execute our
business strategy. We cannot assure you that we would be able to
find appropriate replacements for these key personnel if the
need arose. We may have to incur significant costs to replace
key employees who leave, and our ability to execute our business
strategy could be impaired if we cannot replace departing
employees in a timely manner. Competition in our industry for
persons with trading industry and technology expertise is
intense.
We
rely on third party providers and other suppliers for a number
of services that are important to our business. An interruption
or cessation of an important service or supply by any third
party could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We depend on a number of suppliers, such as online service
providers, hosting service and software providers, data
processors, software and hardware vendors, banks, and telephone
companies, for elements of our trading, clearing and other
systems. For example, we rely on Atos Euronext Market Solutions
Limited for the provision of a trade registration system that
routes trades executed in our markets for clearing. Atos
Euronext Market Solutions Limited and other companies within the
NYSE Euronext group of companies, are potential competitors to
both our futures business and OTC business, which could affect
the continued provision of these services in the future.
Moreover, the general trend toward industry consolidation, may
increase the risk that these services may not be available to us
in the future. We also rely on access to certain data used in
our business through licenses with third parties and we rely on
a large international telecommunications company for the
provision of hosting services. If these companies were to
discontinue providing services to us, we would likely experience
significant disruption to our business.
We cannot assure you that any of these providers will be able to
continue to provide these services in an efficient,
cost-effective manner or that they will be able to adequately
expand their services to meet our needs. We also cannot assure
you that any of these providers will not terminate our business
relationship with us for competitive reasons or otherwise. An
interruption in or the cessation of an important service or
supply by any third party and our inability to make alternative
arrangements in a timely manner, or at all, would result in lost
revenues and higher costs.
In addition, participants trading on our electronic platform may
access it through 29 ISVs, which represent a substantial portion
of the ISVs that serve the commodities markets. The loss of a
significant number of ISVs providing access could make our
platform less attractive to participants who prefer this form of
access.
52
We are
subject to significant litigation and liability
risks.
Many aspects of our business, and the businesses of our
participants, involve substantial risks of liability. These
risks include, among others, potential liability from disputes
over terms of a trade and the claim that a system failure or
delay caused monetary loss to a participant or that an
unauthorized trade occurred. For example, dissatisfied
participants that have traded on our electronic platform or on
ICE Futures U.S.s open outcry exchange, or those on whose
behalf such participants have traded, may make claims regarding
the quality of trade execution, or alleged improperly confirmed
or settled trades, abusive trading practices, security and
confidentiality breaches, mismanagement or even fraud against us
or our participants. In addition, because of the ease and speed
with which sizable trades can be executed on our electronic
platform, participants can lose substantial amounts by
inadvertently entering trade orders or by entering them
inaccurately. A large number of significant error trades could
result in participant dissatisfaction and a decline in
participant willingness to trade in our electronic markets.
Our
compliance and risk management methods might not be effective
and may result in outcomes that could adversely affect our
financial condition and operating results.
Our ability to comply with applicable laws and rules is largely
dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance,
audit and reporting systems, as well as our ability to attract
and retain qualified compliance and other risk management
personnel. Our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and
manage risks may not be fully effective. Management of
operational, legal and regulatory risk requires, among other
things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a
large number of transactions and events. We cannot assure you
that our policies and procedures will always be effective or
that we will always be successful in monitoring or evaluating
the risks to which we are or may be exposed.
In addition, the CFTC has broad enforcement powers to censure,
fine, issue
cease-and-desist
orders, prohibit us from engaging in some of our businesses or
suspend or revoke our designation as a contract market or the
designation of ICE Clear U.S. as a derivatives clearing
organization. Our ability to comply with applicable laws and
rules is largely dependent on our establishment and maintenance
of compliance, audit and reporting systems, as well as our
ability to attract and retain qualified compliance and other
risk management personnel. We face the risk of significant
intervention by regulatory authorities, including extensive
examination and surveillance activity. In the case of
non-compliance or alleged non-compliance with applicable laws or
regulations, we could be subject to investigations and
proceedings that may result in substantial penalties or civil
lawsuits, including by customers, for damages which can be
significant. Any of these outcomes would adversely affect our
reputation, financial condition and operating results. In
extreme cases, these outcomes could adversely affect our ability
to conduct our business.
|
|
ITEM 1(B).
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our most valuable property is our technology and the
infrastructure underlying it. Our intellectual property is
described under the heading Technology in
Item 1 Business. In addition to our
intellectual property, our other primary assets include computer
equipment, software, internally developed software and real
property. We own an array of computers and related equipment.
The net book value of our computer equipment, software and
internally developed software was $46.8 million as of
December 31, 2007.
Our principal executive offices are located in Atlanta, Georgia.
We occupy 46,437 square feet of office space in Atlanta
under a lease that expires on February 15, 2012. We also
lease an aggregate of 158,679 square feet of office space
in New York, London, Chicago, Houston, Winnipeg, Calgary and
Singapore. Our largest physical presence outside of Atlanta is
in New York, New York, where we have leased 111,255 square
feet of office space, primarily relating to ICE Futures
U.S.s executive office and its principal trading floor
that are located at One North End Avenue, New York, New York.
ICE Futures U.S. leases this space from NYMEX under a lease
that expires on July 1, 2013, unless an option to renew for
five years is extended by NYMEX
53
following the initial term. In addition, ICE Futures
U.S. leases space in lower Manhattan to house its primary
computer center, its new grading facility and certain
administrative offices. These leases expire on June 30,
2014 or December 31, 2016. ICE Futures U.S. also
maintains a
back-up
facility, which contains a fully operational trading floor and a
lights-out 24 by 7 computer center, through leases of three
parcels of space in Long Island City for this facility, which
expires on December 31, 2013. Our second largest physical
presence outside of Atlanta is in London, England, where we have
leased 16,348 square feet of office space. The various
leases covering these spaces generally expire between 2008 and
2010.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current
operations and that we will be able to obtain additional space
as and when it is needed.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including
those described below) concerning matters arising in connection
with the conduct of our business. We believe, based on currently
available information, that the results of such proceedings, in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition.
NYMEX
Claim of Infringement
On September 29, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York granted our motion for summary
judgment dismissing all claims brought by NYMEX against us in an
action commenced in November 2002. NYMEXs complaint
alleged copyright infringement by us on the basis of our use of
NYMEXs publicly available settlement prices in two of our
cleared OTC contracts. The complaint also alleged that we
infringe and dilute NYMEXs trademark rights by referring
to NYMEX trademarks in certain of our swap contract
specifications and that we tortiously interfered with a contract
between NYMEX and the data provider that provides us with the
NYMEX settlement prices pursuant to a license. In dismissing all
of NYMEXs claims, the court found that NYMEXs
settlement prices were not copyrightable works as a matter of
law, and we had not engaged in copyright or trademark
infringement in referencing NYMEXs publicly available
settlement prices. The trademark dilution and tortious
interference claims, which are state law claims, were dismissed
on jurisdictional grounds. While the court granted summary
judgment in our favor on all claims, NYMEX appealed the decision
regarding the copyright claims and state law claims in the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On August 1, 2007, the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District
Courts grant of motion for summary judgment in our favor.
On August 15, 2007, NYMEX filed a Combined Petition for
Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, requesting that the case
be reheard before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On
October 25, 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
denied NYMEXs Combined Petition for a rehearing. On
January 16, 2008, NYMEX filed a writ of certiorari with the
U.S. Supreme Court seeking discretionary review of the
case, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided
whether to hear the case. Should NYMEX be successful in its
appeal to the Supreme Court and we are subsequently found to
have infringed NYMEXs intellectual property rights, we may
incur substantial monetary damages and may be enjoined from
using or referring to one or more types of NYMEX settlement
prices.
Klein v.
ICE Futures U.S.; ICE Futures U.S. v. Klein
In December 2007, the parties mutually agreed to settle all
claims and disputes between the parties with respect to the
matters described below.
On July 26, 2000, Klein & Co. Futures, Inc., or
Klein, commenced a civil action, referred to as the Klein
Action, in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (00 Civ. 5563) against numerous
defendants, including ICE Futures U.S., various affiliates of
ICE Futures U.S. and officials of ICE Futures
U.S. and/or
its affiliates. Kleins claims arose out of its collapse in
the wake of the recalculation of settlement prices for futures
and options on the Pacific Stock Exchange Technology Index (an
index of technology stocks) in May 2000. Klein purported to
allege federal claims arising under the CEA and various state
law claims. On February 18, 2005, the District Court
dismissed Kleins CEA claims with prejudice in
54
accordance with Section 22(b) of the CEA for lack of
standing and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
Kleins state law claims. That decision was affirmed on
September 18, 2006, by a panel of the United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and a subsequent motion for
rehearing insomuch as the panel affirmed the District
Courts dismissal of its CEA claims against ICE Futures
U.S. and certain of its affiliates was denied. Klein then
filed a petition in the United States Supreme Court seeking to
appeal the decision of the United States Circuit Court on
March 14, 2007. The petition was granted and the appeal was
heard before the United States Supreme Court on October 29,
2007.
In March 2007, Klein filed a parallel action in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, New York County, against certain
defendants, including ICE Futures U.S. and its former
president. The action alleged a claim of slander and libel
against ICE Futures U.S. and its former president relating
to certain statements made in connection with Kleins
collapse. In May 2007, ICE Futures U.S. filed a motion to
dismiss on multiple grounds. Oral argument was held in August
2007 but the motion was not decided by the court.
Also, on May 14, 2001, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Clear
U.S. commenced an action, referred to as ICE Futures
U.S.s Action, in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (01 Civ. 4071) against Klein.
ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Clear U.S. commenced this
action in their capacity as the assignees of certain claims that
were held against Klein by its former customers. ICE Futures
U.S.s Action sought to recover money owed by Klein to
those customers in the wake of Kleins collapse. In the
same decision that dismissed the Klein action, the District
Court dismissed all of Kleins counterclaims against ICE
Futures U.S., denied ICE Futures U.S.s motion for judgment
on the pleadings and found that the complaint in ICE Futures
U.S.s Action did not state a claim for which relief could
be granted. However, the District Court granted ICE Futures
U.S. leave to replead. On April 14, 2005, ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Clear U.S. filed an amended complaint,
which Klein subsequently moved to dismiss. ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Clear U.S. opposed that motion which was
briefed on August 5, 2005, but was never decided by the
court.
In December 2007 and prior to the Supreme Courts ruling,
the parties mutually agreed to settle all claims and disputes
between the parties through entry of an omnibus settlement
agreement whereby all claims and disputes between them were
released and all actions dismissed, with prejudice, upon payment
of an undisclosed amount by ICE Futures U.S. to Klein. The
payment under the settlement agreement was a
pre-acquisition
contingency that existed at the time of the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition. Therefore, the payment to Klein was
accrued as a liability in the purchase price allocation and had
no income statement impact.
Altman
et al v. ICE Futures U.S.
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, County of New York, granted ICE Futures U.S.s motion
to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced
on December 8, 2006, by certain holders of non-equity
trading permits, or Permit Holders, of ICE Futures
U.S. seeking declaratory, monetary and injunctive relief
with respect to the merger. Plaintiffs alleged that, in
violation of contract rights
and/or
rights under New Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, or
NPCL, ICE Futures U.S.s Permit Holders, including
plaintiffs, were not permitted to vote with respect to the
merger and would not receive any part of the merger
consideration. Plaintiffs sought (i) to enjoin consummation
of the merger, (ii) declaratory relief regarding their past
and future rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of
unspecified damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. The
court also denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary
injunction. On February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders
perfected their appeal from the lower courts ruling
dismissing their complaint. The Permit Holders did not pursue an
appeal of the lower courts denial of their request for an
order enjoining the merger. ICE Futures U.S. will oppose
the appeal and seek affirmance of the lower courts
decision.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of
IntercontinentalExchanges security holders during the
fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
55
|
|
ITEM 4(A).
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
|
Set forth below, in accordance with General
Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K
and Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K,
is information regarding our executive officers and certain
other key employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Charles A. Vice
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Scott A. Hill
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|
David S. Goone
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategic Officer
|
Edwin D. Marcial
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President
|
Johnathan H. Short
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
David J. Peniket
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, ICE Futures Europe
|
Thomas W. Farley
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, ICE Futures U.S.
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher. Mr. Sprecher has
served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since our
inception and has served as our Chairman of the Board since
November 2002. As our Chief Executive Officer, he is responsible
for our strategic direction, operation, and financial
performance. Mr. Sprecher purchased Continental Power
Exchange, Inc., our predecessor company, in 1997. Prior to
joining Continental Power Exchange, Inc., Mr. Sprecher held
a number of positions, including President, over a fourteen-year
period with Western Power Group, Inc., a developer, owner and
operator of large central-station power plants. While with
Western Power, Mr. Sprecher was responsible for a number of
significant financings. In 2002, Mr. Sprecher was
recognized by Business Week magazine as one of its Top
Entrepreneurs. Mr. Sprecher holds a B.S. degree in Chemical
Engineering from the University of Wisconsin and an MBA from
Pepperdine University.
Charles A. Vice. Mr. Vice has served as
our President since October 2005 and our Chief Operating Officer
since July 2001. As our President and Chief Operating Officer,
Mr. Vice is responsible for overseeing our operations,
including market development, customer support and business
development activities. He has over 15 years of experience
in applying information technology in the energy industry.
Mr. Vice joined Continental Power Exchange, Inc. as a
Marketing Director during its startup in 1994, and prior thereto
was a Principal with Energy Management Associates for five
years, providing consulting services to energy firms. From 1985
to 1988, he was a Systems Analyst with Electronic Data Systems.
Mr. Vice holds a Bachelors of Science degree in
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alabama and an MBA
from Vanderbilt University.
Scott A. Hill. Mr. Hill has served as our
Chief Financial Officer since May 2007. As our Chief Financial
Officer, he is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our
finance and accounting functions, including treasury, tax, cash
management and investor relations. He is also responsible for
financial planning, audit, business development and human
resources. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hill spent
16 years as an international finance executive for IBM. He
oversaw IBMs worldwide financial forecasts and
measurements from 2006 through 2007, working alongside the CFO
of IBM and with all of the companys global business units.
Prior to that, Mr. Hill was Vice President and Controller
of IBMs Japan multi-billion dollar business operation from
2003 through 2005. Mr. Hill earned his BBA in Finance from
the University of Texas in Austin and his MBA from New York
University, where he was recognized as a Stern Scholar.
David S. Goone. Mr. Goone has served as
our Senior Vice President, Chief Strategic Officer since March
2001. He is responsible for the expansion of our product line,
including futures products and trading capabilities for our
electronic platform. Mr. Goone also leads our global sale
organization. Prior to joining us, Mr. Goone served as the
Managing Director, Product Development and Sales at the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange where he worked for nine years. From 1989
through 1992, Mr. Goone was Vice President at Indosuez Carr
Futures, where he developed institutional and corporate
business. Prior to joining Indosuez, Mr. Goone worked at
Chase Manhattan Bank, where he developed and managed their
exchange-traded foreign
56
currency options operation at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
Mr. Goone holds a B.S. degree in Accountancy from the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Edwin D. Marcial. Mr. Marcial has served
as our Chief Technology Officer since May 2000. He is
responsible for all systems development and our overall
technology strategy. He also oversees the software design and
development initiatives of our information technology
professionals in the areas of project management, architecture,
software development and quality assurance. Mr. Marcial
joined the software development team at Continental Power
Exchange, Inc. in 1996 and has 14 years of IT experience
building large-scale systems in the energy industry. Prior to
joining Continental Power Exchange, Inc., he led design and
development teams at Harris Corporation building software
systems for the companys energy controls division.
Mr. Marcial earned a B.S. degree in Computer Science from
the College of Engineering at the University of Florida.
Johnathan H. Short. Mr. Short has served
as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary since June 2004. In his role as General Counsel, he is
responsible for managing our legal and regulatory affairs. As
Corporate Secretary, he is also responsible for a variety of our
corporate governance matters. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Short was a partner at McKenna Long &
Aldridge LLP, a national law firm with approximately 350
attorneys. Mr. Short practiced in the corporate law group
of McKenna, Long & Aldridge (and its predecessor firm,
Long Aldridge & Norman LLP) from November 1994 until
he joined us in June 2004. From April 1991 until October 1994,
he practiced in the commercial litigation department of Long
Aldridge & Norman LLP. Mr. Short holds a J.D.
degree from the University of Florida, College of Law, and a
B.S. in Accounting from the University of Florida, Fisher School
of Accounting.
David J. Peniket. Mr. Peniket has served
as President, ICE Futures Europe, since October 2005 and Chief
Operating Officer, ICE Futures Europe, since January 2005.
Mr. Peniket is responsible for ICE Futures Europes
financial performance, technology and market operations, human
resources, business development and regulation and risk
management. Prior to assuming the role of Chief Operating
Officer, Mr. Peniket served as Director of Finance of ICE
Futures Europe since May 2000. Before joining ICE Futures Europe
in 1999, Mr. Peniket worked for seven years at KPMG LLP,
where he trained as an accountant and was a consultant in its
financial management practice. Mr. Peniket was Research
Assistant to John Cartwright MP from 1988 to 1991. He holds a
B.Sc. (Econ) degree in Economics from the London School of
Economics and Political Science and is a Chartered Accountant.
Thomas W. Farley. Mr. Farley joined ICE
Futures U.S. in February 2007 as President and Chief
Operating Officer. Mr. Farley is also a member of the Board
of Directors of ICE Futures U.S. Prior to joining ICE
Futures U.S., from July 2006 to January 2007, Mr. Farley
was President of SunGard Kiodex, a risk management technology
provider to the commodity derivatives markets. From October 2000
to July 2006, Mr. Farley served as Kiodexs Chief
Financial Officer and he also served as Kiodexs Chief
Operating Officer from January 2003 to July 2006. Prior to
Kiodex, Mr. Farley held positions in investment banking and
private equity. Mr. Farley holds a Bachelor of Arts in
Political Science from Georgetown University.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Approximate
Number of Holders of Common Stock
At February 11, 2008, there were approximately
743 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have paid no dividends on our common stock and we do not
anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the
future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend upon our results of operations, financial
conditions,
57
contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law
or the SEC and other factors our board of directors deems
relevant.
Price
Range of Common Stock
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
ticker symbol ICE. Our common stock was initially
offered and sold to the public at a price of $26.00 per share
and has been publicly traded since November 16, 2005. Prior
to that date, there was no public market in our stock. On
February 12, 2008, our common stock traded at a high of
$138.49 per share and a low of $130.77 per share. The
following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale
prices for the periods indicated for our common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Market Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
73.59
|
|
|
$
|
36.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
82.40
|
|
|
$
|
45.27
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
77.92
|
|
|
$
|
51.77
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
113.85
|
|
|
$
|
72.15
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
167.00
|
|
|
$
|
108.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
162.47
|
|
|
$
|
120.56
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
174.15
|
|
|
$
|
117.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
194.92
|
|
|
$
|
151.76
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about our common stock
that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans
as of December 31, 2007, which consists of the 2000 Stock
Option Plan, 2003 Directors Plan, 2004 Restricted Stock
Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
|
Securities to be Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
2,063,364
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
35.91
|
(1)
|
|
|
1,521,800
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
|
|
|
850,715
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
(2)
|
|
|
333,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
2,914,079
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
(1)(2)
|
|
|
1,855,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2000 Stock Option Plan was approved by our stockholders in
June 2000 and the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by our
stockholders in June 2005. Of the 2,063,364 securities to be
issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights,
1,359,087 are options with a weighted average exercise price of
$35.91 and the remaining 704,277 securities are restricted stock
shares that do not have an exercise price. |
|
(2) |
|
This category includes the 2003 Directors Plan and the 2004
Restricted Stock Plan. The weighted average exercise price of
outstanding options and rights in column (b) for equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders is not
applicable since the only grants or awards under these plans
have been restricted stock and restricted stock units, which do
not have an exercise price. For more information concerning
these plans, see note 11 to our consolidated financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
58
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following tables present our selected consolidated financial
data as of and for the dates and periods indicated. We derived
the selected consolidated financial data set forth below for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 from our audited consolidated
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We derived the selected consolidated financial data set forth
below for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and as
of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected consolidated financial data presented below is not
indicative of our future results for any period. The selected
consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income/(Loss) Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net(2)
|
|
$
|
490,358
|
|
|
$
|
273,629
|
|
|
$
|
136,976
|
|
|
$
|
90,906
|
|
|
$
|
81,434
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
70,396
|
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
|
|
14,642
|
|
|
|
12,290
|
|
|
|
9,624
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
574,293
|
|
|
|
313,799
|
|
|
|
155,865
|
|
|
|
108,414
|
|
|
|
93,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
101,397
|
|
|
|
49,750
|
|
|
|
35,753
|
|
|
|
30,074
|
|
|
|
26,236
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
23,047
|
|
|
|
11,395
|
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
12,312
|
|
|
|
13,066
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
9,039
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(3)
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
50,759
|
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
17,395
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
16,171
|
|
Floor closure costs(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement expense(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
|
|
17,024
|
|
|
|
19,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
220,730
|
|
|
|
109,164
|
|
|
|
99,660
|
|
|
|
76,020
|
|
|
|
74,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
353,563
|
|
|
|
204,635
|
|
|
|
56,205
|
|
|
|
32,394
|
|
|
|
18,918
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
358,434
|
|
|
|
212,543
|
|
|
|
59,995
|
|
|
|
33,722
|
|
|
|
19,866
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
|
|
19,585
|
|
|
|
11,773
|
|
|
|
6,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(6)
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
$
|
21,949
|
|
|
$
|
13,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,378
|
|
Deduction for accretion of Class B redeemable common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
(20,909
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,949
|
|
|
$
|
19,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share(8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding(8):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
52,865
|
|
|
|
54,329
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
|
|
54,640
|
|
59
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes revenues from related parties generated in the ordinary
course of our business. For a presentation and discussion of our
revenues attributable to related parties for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, see our consolidated
statements of income and note 13 to our consolidated
financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Our transaction fees are presented net of rebates. For a
discussion of these rebates, see Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Sources of
Revenues Transaction Fees included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
In 2007, we incurred $11.1 million in transaction costs
directly relating to the proposed merger with CBOT Holdings,
Inc., or CBOT. We did not succeed in our proposed merger with
CBOT and CME completed its acquisition of CBOT in July 2007.
These costs are classified as CBOT merger-related
transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2007.
See note 18 to our consolidated financial statements that
are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
In 2005, we closed our open-outcry trading floor in London to
take advantage of the increasing acceptance and adoption of
electronic trading, and to maintain and enhance our competitive
position. Costs associated with the floor closure were
$4.8 million and are classified as Floor closure
costs in the accompanying consolidated statement of income
for the year ended December 31, 2005. See note 20 to
our consolidated financial statements that are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(5) |
|
In 2005, we settled a legal action brought by EBS against us
related to alleged patent infringement. Under the settlement
agreement, we made a payment to EBS of $15.0 million, and
were released from the legal claims brought against us without
admitting liability. The payment was recorded as
Settlement expense in the accompanying consolidated
statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2005.
See note 19 to our consolidated financial statements that
are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(6) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2007
include $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related transaction
costs. Excluding these costs, net of taxes, our consolidated net
income for the year ended December 31, 2007 would have been
$247.8 million. The financial results for the year ended
December 31, 2005 include $4.8 million in expenses
incurred relating to the closure of our open-outcry trading
floor in London and a $15.0 million settlement expense
related to the payment made to EBS to settle litigation.
Excluding these charges, net of taxes, our consolidated net
income for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have been
$53.1 million. See Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Non-GAAP Financial Measures,
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(7) |
|
In connection with our formation, we granted a put option to
Continental Power Exchange, Inc., an entity controlled by our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey C. Sprecher. The
put option would have required us under certain circumstances to
purchase Continental Power Exchange, Inc.s equity interest
in our business at a purchase price equal to the greater of the
fair market value of the equity interest or $5 million. We
initially recorded the redeemable stock put at the minimum
$5 million redemption threshold. We adjusted the redeemable
stock put to its redemption amount at each subsequent balance
sheet date. Adjustments to the redemption amount were recorded
to retained earnings or, in the absence of positive retained
earnings, additional paid-in capital. In October 2005, we
entered into an agreement with Continental Power Exchange, Inc.
to terminate the redeemable stock put upon the closing of our
initial public offering of common stock in November 2005. We
increased the redeemable stock put by $61.3 million during
the year ended December 31, 2005 resulting from an increase
in the estimated fair value of our common stock from $8.00 per
share as of December 31, 2004 to $35.90 per share as of
November 21, 2005, the closing date of our initial public
offering of common stock and the termination date of the
redeemable stock put. The balance of the redeemable stock put on
November 21, 2005 was $78.9 million and was
reclassified to additional paid-in capital upon its termination.
See note 10 to our consolidated financial statements that
are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
In connection with the termination of the put option, we amended
certain registration rights previously granted to Continental
Power Exchange, Inc. pursuant to which we may be obligated to
pay the expenses of registration, including underwriting
discounts up to a maximum of $4.5 million. |
60
|
|
|
(8) |
|
The impact of outstanding stock options is considered to be
antidilutive in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
when a net loss available to common shareholders is reported.
Our outstanding stock options have not been included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2005 due to the $20.9 million net loss
available to common shareholders as a result of the
$61.3 million charged to retained earnings related to the
redeemable stock put adjustments. Therefore, our diluted
earnings per share are computed in the same manner as basic
earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005. If
the redemption adjustments to the redeemable stock put are
excluded from the calculation of earnings per share, the
resulting adjusted basic earnings per share would have been
$0.76 based on the $40.4 million in consolidated net income
for the year ended December 2005 and adjusted diluted earnings
per share would have been $0.74. The adjusted diluted earnings
per share would have been based on 54.4 million in adjusted
diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, which
includes 1.2 million stock options and restricted stock
having a dilutive effect for the year ended December 31,
2005. The adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share for the
year ended December 31, 2005, excluding the redeemable
stock put adjustments, the $4.8 million floor closure costs
and the $15.0 million settlement expenses, would have been
$1.00 and $0.98, respectively. See Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Financial Measures, included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
|
$
|
204,257
|
|
|
$
|
20,002
|
|
|
$
|
61,199
|
|
|
$
|
44,913
|
|
Restricted cash and restricted short-term investments(1)
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
|
|
16,193
|
|
|
|
12,578
|
|
|
|
18,421
|
|
|
|
36,797
|
|
Short-term investments(2)
|
|
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
77,354
|
|
|
|
111,181
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds asset(3)
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,142,094
|
|
|
|
340,917
|
|
|
|
164,015
|
|
|
|
100,042
|
|
|
|
105,893
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
20,348
|
|
|
|
19,364
|
|
|
|
25,625
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net(4)
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
|
|
86,075
|
|
|
|
81,448
|
|
Cost method investments(5)
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
38,738
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
|
493,211
|
|
|
|
265,770
|
|
|
|
207,518
|
|
|
|
214,879
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds liability(3)
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
910,961
|
|
|
|
37,899
|
|
|
|
26,394
|
|
|
|
34,440
|
|
|
|
17,917
|
|
Current and long-term debt(1)(6)
|
|
|
221,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B redeemable common stock(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
Redeemable stock put(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,582
|
|
|
|
17,582
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,476,856
|
|
|
|
454,468
|
|
|
|
232,623
|
|
|
|
132,149
|
|
|
|
101,194
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We redeemed all outstanding shares of our Class B
redeemable common stock in November 2004, which resulted in a
$18.5 million reduction in cash and cash equivalents, a
$24.0 million reduction in restricted short-term
investments, a $25.0 million increase in current and
long-term debt and a corresponding $67.5 million reduction
in Class B redeemable common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
We received net proceeds from our initial public offering of our
common stock in November 2005 of $60.8 million, after
deducting the underwriting discount. We also invested a portion
of our cash in excess of short-term operating needs in
investment-grade marketable debt securities and municipal bonds. |
61
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Clearing members of ICE Clear U.S., ICE Futures U.S.s
clearing house, and ICE Clear Canada, ICE Futures Canadas
clearing house, are required to deposit original margin and
variation margin and to make deposits to a guaranty fund. The
cash deposits made to these margin accounts and to the guaranty
fund are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as current
assets with offsetting current liabilities to the clearing
members that deposited them. See note 15 to our
consolidation financial statement that are included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
The increase in the goodwill and other intangible assets in 2007
relates to the acquisitions of ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures
Canada, Commoditrack, ChemConnect and Chatham that occurred
during the year ended December 31, 2007. See note 8 to
our consolidation financial statements that are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(5) |
|
In December 2006, we purchased an 8% equity share in NCDEX for
$36.3 million. See note 6 to our consolidated
financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(6) |
|
We borrowed $250.0 million in a senior unsecured credit
facility in connection with the purchase of ICE Futures U.S. in
January 2007. See note 9 to our consolidation financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(7) |
|
In October 2005, we entered into an agreement with Continental
Power Exchange, Inc. to cancel the redeemable stock put upon the
closing of the initial public offering of our common stock in
November 2005. See note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for percentages)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Market Share of Selected Key Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total crude oil futures contracts traded globally(1)
|
|
|
232,643
|
|
|
|
144,085
|
|
|
|
91,049
|
|
|
|
78,477
|
|
|
|
69,450
|
|
ICE Brent Crude oil futures contracts traded
|
|
|
59,729
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
|
|
25,458
|
|
|
|
24,013
|
|
ICE WTI Crude oil futures contracts traded
|
|
|
51,388
|
|
|
|
28,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our crude oil futures market share(1)
|
|
|
47.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cleared Henry Hub natural gas contracts traded on us and
NYMEX-ClearPort
|
|
|
133,463
|
|
|
|
121,144
|
|
|
|
53,166
|
|
|
|
21,241
|
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
Our cleared Henry Hub natural gas contracts traded
|
|
|
117,256
|
|
|
|
96,957
|
|
|
|
42,760
|
|
|
|
15,887
|
|
|
|
4,512
|
|
Our market share cleared Henry Hub natural gas vs.
NYMEX-ClearPort(2)
|
|
|
87.9
|
%
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
|
|
74.8
|
%
|
|
|
65.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cleared PJM financial power contracts traded on us and
NYMEX-ClearPort
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Our cleared PJM financial power contracts traded
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Our market share cleared PJM financial power vs.
NYMEX-ClearPort(3)
|
|
|
97.3
|
%
|
|
|
93.6
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
|
|
68.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Average Daily Trading Fee Revenues(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our futures business average daily exchange fee revenues
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our bilateral OTC business average daily commission fee revenues
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Our cleared OTC business average daily commission fee revenues
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our OTC business average daily commission fee revenues
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total average daily exchange fee and commission fee revenues
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
|
$
|
1,071
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Trading Volume(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures volume
|
|
|
191,998
|
|
|
|
92,721
|
|
|
|
42,055
|
|
|
|
35,541
|
|
|
|
33,341
|
|
Futures average daily volume
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
OTC volume
|
|
|
174,858
|
|
|
|
130,832
|
|
|
|
61,999
|
|
|
|
30,961
|
|
|
|
24,260
|
|
OTC average daily volume
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
OTC Participants Trading Commission Percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial companies (including merchant energy)
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
|
64.1
|
%
|
Banks and financial institutions
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
Liquidity providers
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total crude oil futures contracts traded globally and our
resulting crude oil futures market share is calculated based on
the number of ICE Brent Crude futures contracts and ICE WTI
Crude futures contracts traded as compared to the total ICE
Brent Crude futures contracts, ICE WTI Crude futures contracts,
NYMEX Light Sweet Crude and London/Dublin Brent Crude futures
contracts traded. |
|
(2) |
|
Our cleared Henry Hub market share versus NYMEX-ClearPort is
calculated based on the number of OTC cleared Henry Hub natural
gas contracts traded as a percentage of the total OTC cleared
Henry Hub natural gas contracts and NYMEX-ClearPort Henry Hub
natural gas OTC contracts traded. |
63
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Our cleared PJM financial power market share versus
NYMEX-ClearPort is calculated based on the number of
IntercontinentalExchange cleared PJM financial power contracts
traded as a percentage of the total IntercontinentalExchange
cleared PJM financial power contracts and NYMEX-ClearPort
cleared PJM financial power contracts traded. PJM refers to the
Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland power trading hub. The
NYMEX-ClearPort cleared PJM financial power contract was
launched in April 2003 and our PJM financial power contract was
launched in November 2003. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the total commission fee and exchange fee revenues
for the year divided by the number of trading days during that
year. |
|
(5) |
|
Volume is calculated based on the number of contracts traded in
our markets, which is the number of round turn trades. Each
round turn trade represents a matched buy and sell order of one
contract. Average daily volume represents the total volume, in
contracts, for the year divided by the number of trading days
during the year. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements for many reasons, including those set
forth in Item 1(A) under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following discussion is qualified in its entirety by, and
should be read in conjunction with, the more detailed
information contained in Item 6 Selected Financial
Data and our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a leading global exchange and over-the-counter, or OTC,
market operator. We offer the leading electronic integrated
futures and OTC marketplace for trading a broad array of energy
products, as well as the leading soft commodities exchange.
Currently, we are the only marketplace to offer an integrated
electronic platform for
side-by-side
trading of products in both futures and OTC markets. Through our
widely-distributed electronic trading platform, our marketplace
brings together buyers and sellers of derivative and physical
commodities and financial contracts. We conduct our regulated
U.K. futures markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE
Futures Europe (formerly known as ICE Futures). We conduct our
regulated U.S. futures markets through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, ICE Futures U.S. (formerly known as the Board
of Trade of the City of New York, Inc., or NYBOT). We conduct
our regulated Canadian futures markets through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, ICE Futures Canada (formerly known as the Winnipeg
Commodity Exchange Inc., or WCE). ICE Futures U.S. has a
wholly-owned clearing house subsidiary called ICE Clear
U.S. (formerly known as the New York Clearing Corp., or
NYCC) and ICE Futures Canada has a wholly-owned clearing house
subsidiary called ICE Clear Canada (formerly known as the WCE
Clearing Corporation). We completed our acquisition of ICE
Futures U.S. on January 12, 2007 and our acquisition
of ICE Futures Canada on August 27, 2007.
We operate our business through three segments: a futures
business segment, an OTC business segment and a market data
business segment. In our futures markets, we offer trading in
standardized derivative contracts on our regulated exchanges. In
our OTC markets, we offer trading in over-the-counter, or
off-exchange, derivative contracts, including contracts that
provide for the physical delivery of an underlying commodity or
for financial settlement based on the price of an underlying
commodity. Through our market data segment, we offer a variety
of market data services and products for both futures and OTC
market participants and observers.
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated revenues increased by 83.0% to
$574.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the same period in 2006, primarily due to increased
contract volumes in our futures and OTC markets resulting from
organic growth and acquisitions.
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated operating expenses increased by 102.2% to
$220.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the same period in 2006, primarily due to
acquisitions, higher cash and non-cash compensation costs, CBOT
merger-related transaction expenses and increased technology
spending.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated operating margin decreased to 61.6% for the
year ended December 31, 2007, compared to 65.2% for the
same period in 2006 primarily due to the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition and the CBOT merger-related transaction
expenses incurred during 2007.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated net income increased by 67.9% to
$240.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to the same period in 2006.
|
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $574.3 million in
revenues for year ended December 31, 2007, a 83.0% increase
compared to $313.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Consolidated net income was
$240.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, a
67.9% increase compared to $143.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The financial results for the year
ended December 31, 2007 include $11.1 million in CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, or $7.2 million after
tax. Excluding these costs, our net income would have been
$247.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, 192.0 million
contracts were traded in our futures markets, up 107.1% from
92.7 million contracts traded during the year ended
December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31,
2007, 174.9 million contract equivalents were traded in our
OTC markets, up 33.7% from 130.8 million contract
equivalents traded during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Our
Business Environment
Our business is primarily transaction based, and our revenues
and profitability relate directly to the level of trading
activity in our markets. Trading volumes are driven by a number
of factors, including the degree of volatility in commodities
prices. Price volatility increases the need to hedge contractual
price risk and creates opportunities for arbitrage or
speculative trading. Changes in our futures trading volumes and
OTC average daily commissions have also been driven by varying
levels of liquidity and volatility both in our markets and in
the broader markets for commodities trading, which influence
trading volumes across all of the markets we operate.
We operate our energy futures and OTC markets and for ICE
Futures Canada exclusively on our electronic platform and we
currently offer ICE Futures U.S.s markets on both our
electronic platform and through our trading floor based in New
York. We transitioned our Canadian futures contracts to our
electronic platform in the fourth quarter of 2007. We believe
that the move toward electronic trade execution, together with
the improved accessibility for new market participants and the
increased adoption of energy commodities as a tradable,
investable asset class, has contributed to and will likely
support continued secular growth in the global markets. As
participation continues to increase and as participants continue
to employ more sophisticated financial instruments and risk
management strategies to manage their price exposure, we believe
there remains opportunity for further growth in derivatives
trading on a global basis. We do not risk our own capital by
engaging in any trading activities.
Variability
in Quarterly Comparisons
In addition to general conditions in the financial markets and
in our markets in particular, commodity trading has historically
been subject to variability in trading volumes due primarily to
five key factors. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
Geopolitical Events: Geopolitical events tend
to impact global commodity prices and may impact commodity
supply. Because commodity prices often move in conjunction with
changes in the perception of geopolitical risk, these events in
the past have impacted trading activities in our markets due to
the increased volatility and need for risk management in times
of uncertainty.
|
|
|
|
Weather: Weather events have been an important
factor in price volatility and the supply and demand of energy,
soft agricultural and agricultural commodities and, therefore,
the trading activities of market
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
participants. Unexpected or extreme weather conditions, such as
low temperatures or hurricanes, and other events that cause
demand increases, supply disruptions or unexpected volatility
tend to result in business disruptions and expanded hedging and
trading activity in our markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real and Perceived Supply and Demand
Imbalances: Various agencies and groups, such as
the International Energy Agency, regularly track commodity
supply data. Reporting on supply or production may impact
trading volume and price volatility due to real or perceived
supply and demand imbalances.
|
|
|
|
Number of Trading Days: The variability in the
number of business days in each quarter affects our revenues,
and will affect quarter-to-quarter revenue comparisons, since
trading generally only takes place on business days.
|
|
|
|
Seasonality: Participants engaged in energy, soft
agricultural and agricultural businesses tend to experience
moderate seasonal fluctuations in demand and price volatility,
although such seasonal impacts have been somewhat negated in
periods of high volume trading.
|
These and other factors could cause our revenues to fluctuate
from period to period. These fluctuations may affect the
reliability of period to period comparisons of our revenues and
operating results when, for example, these comparisons are
between periods in different seasons. Inter-seasonal comparisons
will not necessarily be indicative of our results for future
periods.
Segment
Reporting
For financial reporting purposes, as of December 31, 2007,
our business is divided into three segments: our futures
business segment, our OTC business segment and our market data
business segment. For a discussion of these segments and related
financial disclosure, refer to note 21 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We combined our U.K. futures business segment and our
U.S. futures business segment into one single futures
business segment to better reflect the manner in which
management views the business and in connection with the
globalization of our futures business as a result of the
acquisition of ICE Futures Canada.
66
Our
Futures Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our futures business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
$
|
87,308
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,126
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
41,334
|
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
49,942
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
30,683
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar futures
|
|
|
48,647
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures products and options
|
|
|
92,696
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
28,611
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
15,856
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
293,087
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
131,428
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
65,190
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(3)
|
|
|
80,053
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
25,939
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
22,865
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Intersegment expenses(4)
|
|
|
30,836
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
24,892
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
10,289
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Floor closure costs(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
117,275
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
52,862
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
40,432
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
175,812
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
78,566
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
14,217
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
64,005
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
9,606
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(5)
|
|
$
|
126,024
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,164
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,838
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $424,000,
$12.7 million and $11.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For a
discussion of our related parties, see note 13 to our
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Our transaction fees are presented net of rebates. For a
discussion of these rebates, see Sources of
Revenues Transactions Fees. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional
services expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Intersegment expenses represent fees paid by our futures
business segment for support provided by the OTC business
segment to operate the electronic trading platform used in our
futures business. |
|
(5) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2005
include $4.8 million in expenses incurred relating to the
closure of the open-outcry trading floor in London. Excluding
these floor closure charges, net of taxes, our futures business
net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 would have
been $21.0 million. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Our ICE Brent Crude futures contract is a benchmark contract
relied upon by a broad range of market participants, including
certain large oil producing nations, to price their crude oil.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the average daily
quantity of Brent crude oil traded in our markets was
232.4 million barrels, with an average notional daily value
of over $16.7 billion. We believe that market participants
are increasingly relying on this contract for their risk
management activities, as evidenced by steady increases in
traded volumes over the past several years. The growth of the
ICE Brent Crude futures contract, as well as the
67
launch of our ICE WTI Crude futures contract in February 2006
and its continued growth, has allowed us to achieve a 47.8%
market share of the global oil futures contracts traded for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
In our futures business segment, we earn transaction fees from
both counterparties to each futures contract or option on
futures contract that is traded, based on the volume of the
commodity underlying the futures or option contract that is
traded. We derived futures transaction fees of
$278.6 million, $123.4 million and $57.2 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, representing 48.5%, 39.3% and 36.7%, respectively,
of our consolidated revenues. The transaction fees earned on
energy futures and option transactions, which occur through ICE
Futures Europe, increased $55.5 million or 44.9% to
$178.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $123.4 million during the year ended December 31,
2006. The transaction fees earned on soft agriculture and
agriculture futures and options transactions, which occur
through ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada, were
$93.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
transaction fees earned on financial futures and options
transactions, which occur through ICE Futures U.S., were
$5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
A contract is a standardized quantity of the physical commodity
underlying each futures contract. The following table presents
the underlying commodity size per futures contract traded in our
key futures markets as well as the relevant standard of measure
for each contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contract
|
|
Size
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Barrels
|
|
ICE WTI Crude
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Barrels
|
|
ICE Gas Oil
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Metric Tonnes
|
|
Sugar
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
Pounds
|
|
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, trading
activity in our futures markets for commodity type based on the
total number of contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Number of futures and option contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
59,729
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
|
30,412
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures(1)
|
|
|
51,388
|
|
|
|
28,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
|
|
10,972
|
|
Sugar futures(2)
|
|
|
20,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures and options(3)
|
|
|
35,560
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
191,998
|
|
|
|
92,721
|
|
|
|
42,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A fee waiver applied to trade execution for ICE WTI Crude
futures contracts from the launch date of February 3, 2006
through March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Sugar futures began trading on January 12, 2007 in
connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
|
(3) |
|
The increase in the other futures and options contracts
primarily relates to the trading of the coffee futures and
options, cotton futures and options, cocoa futures and options
and sugar options, which began trading on January 12, 2007
in connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
68
The following chart presents the futures transaction fee
revenues by contract traded in our futures markets for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A fee waiver applied to trade execution for the ICE WTI Crude
futures contracts from the launch date of February 3, 2006
through March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Sugar futures began trading on January 12, 2007 in
connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
The following table presents our average daily open interest for
our futures contracts. Open interest is the number of contracts
(long or short) that a member holds either for its own account
or on behalf of its clients. Open interest refers to the total
number of contracts that are currently open in other
words, contracts that have been traded but not yet liquidated by
either an offsetting trade, exercise, expiration or assignment.
Open interest is also a measure of the future activity remaining
to be closed out in terms of the number of contracts that
members and their clients continue to hold in the particular
contract and by the number of contracts held for each contract
month listed by the exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Open interest futures and options contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Sugar futures and options(1)
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton futures and options(1)
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee futures and options(1)
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cocoa futures and options(1)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures and options
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sugar, cotton, coffee and cocoa futures and options began
trading on January 12, 2007 in connection with the ICE
Futures U.S. acquisition. |
We charge transaction fees to the clearing members of ICE
Futures Europe, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada for
contracts traded for their own account and for contracts traded
on behalf of their customers or local traders.
69
Our
OTC Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our OTC business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
$
|
155,533
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,302
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,911
|
|
|
|
62.9
|
%
|
North American power
|
|
|
43,349
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
27,223
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
16,444
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Other commodities markets
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Electronic trade confirmation
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
32,311
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
26,704
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
27,256
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
16,168
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
274,114
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
195,447
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
95,213
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(3)
|
|
|
94,350
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
67,451
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
40,808
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(4)
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement expense(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,286
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
12,609
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
151,162
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
90,343
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
69,769
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
122,952
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
105,104
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
25,444
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(9,846
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,907
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
33,858
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
7,698
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(4)(5)
|
|
$
|
79,199
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
77,494
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,335
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $1.3 million,
$3.2 million and $6.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For a
discussion of our related parties, see note 13 to our
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Our transaction fees are presented net of rebates. For a
discussion of these rebates, see Sources of
Revenues Transaction Fees. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses, professional
services expenses and patent royalty expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2007
include $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related transaction
costs. Excluding these costs, net of taxes, our OTC business net
income for the year ended December 31, 2007 would have been
$86.4 million. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
|
(5) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2005
include a $15.0 million settlement expense related to the
payment made to EBS to settle litigation. Excluding this
expense, net of taxes, our OTC business net income for the year
ended December 31, 2005 would have been $27.9 million.
See Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
Revenues in our OTC business segment are generated primarily
through transaction fees earned from trades. While we charge a
monthly data access fee for access to our electronic platform,
we derive a substantial portion of our OTC revenues from
transaction fees paid by participants for each trade that they
execute or clear based on the underlying commodity volume.
Transaction fees are payable by each
70
counterparty to a trade and, for bilateral trades, are generally
due within 30 days of the invoice date. We derived
transaction fees for OTC trades executed on our electronic
platform of $205.8 million, $146.7 million and
$78.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, representing 35.8%, 46.7% and
50.2%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues. Our OTC
commission rates vary by product and are based on the volume of
the commodity underlying the contract that is traded.
In addition to our transaction fees, a participant that chooses
to clear a trade must currently pay a fee to LCH.Clearnet for
the benefit of clearing and another for the services of the
relevant member clearing firm, or FCMs. Consistent with our ICE
Futures U.S. business, we currently do not derive any
direct revenues from the clearing process and participants pay
the clearing fees directly to LCH.Clearnet and the FCMs.
However, we have announced plans to launch ICE Clear Europe in
the third quarter of 2008. For the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, transaction fees related to cleared trades
represented 69.3%, 71.8% and 69.3% of our total OTC revenues,
respectively, net of intersegment fees. We intend to continue to
support the introduction of these products in response to the
requirements of our participants.
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
total volume of the underlying commodity and number of contracts
traded in our OTC markets, measured in the units indicated in
the footnotes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Total volume OTC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas(1)
|
|
|
394,880
|
|
|
|
302,591
|
|
|
|
138,809
|
|
North American power(2)
|
|
|
5,492
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
Global oil and refined products(3)
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Number of OTC contracts traded(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
157,956
|
|
|
|
121,047
|
|
|
|
55,524
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
Global oil
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
Other
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
174,858
|
|
|
|
130,832
|
|
|
|
61,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Measured in million British thermal units, or MMBtu. |
|
(2) |
|
Measured in megawatt hours. |
|
(3) |
|
Measured in equivalent barrels of oil. |
|
(4) |
|
These OTC market volumes are converted into contracts based on
the conversion ratios in the table below. |
The following table presents the underlying commodity size for
selected OTC contracts traded in our OTC markets as well as the
relevant standard of measure for such contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC Contract
|
|
Size
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
Financial gas
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
Physical gas
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
European gas
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Therms per day
|
East power
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Megawatt Hours per day
|
West power
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Megawatt Hours per day
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Barrels
|
Refined oil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Barrels
|
71
The following chart presents the OTC transaction fee revenues by
commodity traded in our markets for the periods presented:
The following table presents our average monthly open interest
for our cleared OTC contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Open interest cleared OTC contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Global oil and refined products
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
Market Data Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our market data business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
$
|
43,140
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,032
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,604
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
%
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
19,079
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
62,236
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
29,155
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(2)
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
8,190
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
7,465
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
54,799
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
20,965
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
19,910
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
35,389
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
46.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $157,000 and
$198,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. For a discussion of our related parties, see
note 13 to our consolidated financial statements, which are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional
services expenses. |
We earn terminal and license fee revenues that we receive from
data vendors through the distribution of real-time and
historical futures prices and other futures market data derived
from trading in our futures markets. We also earn subscription
fee revenues from OTC daily indices, view only access to the OTC
markets and OTC and futures end of day reports. In addition, we
manage the market price validation curves whereby participant
companies subscribe to receive consensus market valuations.
Intersegment
Fees
Our OTC business segment provides and supports the platform for
electronic trading in our futures business segment. Intersegment
fees include charges for developing, operating, managing and
supporting the platform for electronic trading in our futures
business segment. Our futures business segment and our OTC
business segment provide access to trading volumes to our market
data business segment. Our market data business segment provides
marketing and other promotional services to our OTC business
segment. We determine the intercompany or intersegment fees to
be paid by the business segments based on transfer pricing
standards and independent documentation. These intersegment fees
have no impact on our consolidated operating results. We expect
the structure of these intersegment fees to remain unchanged and
expect that they will continue to have no impact on our
consolidated operating results.
Sources
of Revenues
Our revenues are comprised of transaction fees, market data fees
and other revenues.
Transaction
Fees
Transaction fees have accounted for, and are expected to
continue to account for, a substantial portion of our revenues.
Transaction fees consist of exchange fees earned on futures
transactions, commission fees earned on OTC transactions,
electronic confirmation fees and, for transactions executed on
ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada, clearing fees. We
charge commission fees or exchange fees to both the buyer and
the seller in each transaction executed on our platform.
Commission fees and exchange fees are based on the number of
contracts traded during each month multiplied by the commission
rate. A change to either our commission rate or to the volume of
contracts we execute directly affects our revenues. We also
accept transactions that participants execute off-platform but
wish to have processed for clearing. We do not risk our own
capital by engaging in any trading activities.
Transaction fees are presented net of rebates. We recorded
rebates in our OTC business segment of $3.5 million,
$203,000 and $376,000 for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We recorded rebates in ICE
Futures Europe of $30.1 million, $7.2 million and
$200,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The rebate program has reduced ICE Futures
Europes average rate per contract by $0.21, $0.08 and
$0.01 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The increase in the rebates at ICE Futures Europe
is primarily related to the rebates offered on the ICE WTI Crude
futures contract. We recorded rebates in ICE Futures
U.S. of $3.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007. The rebate program has reduced the ICE
Futures U.S. average rate per contract by $0.07 for the
year ended December 31, 2007. We recorded rebates in ICE
Futures Canada of $149,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2007. We offer rebates in certain of our
markets primarily to help generate market liquidity and trading
volumes by providing customers trading in those markets a full
or partial discount to the applicable commission rate.
Typically, we offer these rebates until we believe the market
has generated sufficient liquidity and volume so that the
rebates are no longer needed to sustain and promote liquidity.
These rebates reduce revenue that we would have generated had we
charged full commissions and had we generated the same volume
without the rebate program.
73
Market
Data Fees
Market data fees consist of terminal fees and license fees that
we receive from data vendors in exchange for the provision of
real-time price information generated from our futures markets
through ICE Data. We invoice these data vendors monthly for
terminal fees based on the number of terminals that carry our
futures market data. Each data vendor also pays an annual
license fee which is deferred and recognized as revenue ratably
over the period for which services are provided.
Market data fees consist of data access fees that we have
historically charged to participants or customers that were not
active traders who were registered to trade or view OTC natural
gas and power products on our electronic platform. The data
access fees were based on their historical trading activity and
the number of users the participant firm had registered to trade
on our platform. We recognized the difference between the
monthly data access fee for a given participant and the actual
amount of commission fees generated by such participant for
trading activity in that month as data access revenues.
Beginning in March 2006, we changed the methodology for charging
OTC data access fees. The OTC data access fees are charged on a
per-user basis to those accessing our platform (both trading and
view only access). We also began to charge data access fees in
our energy futures business segment beginning in February 2006,
at the individual user level. The futures data access fees
replaced the futures system user fees that were previously
charged to our energy futures exchange members.
Market data fees also consist of subscription fees that we
receive from market participants who subscribe to our OTC market
data services through ICE Data. ICE Data has an exclusive
license to use our OTC market data and publishes the ICE Data
end of day report, ICE daily indices, as well as market price
validation curves, which are available to subscribers for a
monthly subscription fee. ICE Data also markets real-time view
only screen access to OTC markets and charges subscribers a fee
that varies depending on the number of users and the markets
accessed at each subscribing company. The revenues we receive
from market data fees are deferred and recognized as revenue
ratably over the period for which services are provided.
Other
Revenues
Other revenues primarily include revenues generated from
membership fees, training seminars, trade registration system
fees, eCOPS documentation fees, initiation fees, booth fees,
broker telephone fees, grading fees, certification fees and
licensing fees charged to the Chicago Climate Exchange, or CCX,
and the European Climate Exchange, or ECX, among others.
Other revenues include fees charged to CCX, a self-regulated
marketplace that administers a voluntary multi-sector greenhouse
gas reduction and trading program for North America. We, through
our OTC business segment, have been contracted to provide,
design and service CCXs electronic markets on our trading
platform in the United States. We charge licensing and service
fees in advance to CCX on a monthly basis and these fees are
recognized as services are provided. We also have an agreement,
through our energy futures business, with CCX and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, ECX, to list certain European emissions
contracts on our platform. Under this agreement, we have charged
ECX certain operating costs, which represented 27.5% of the
net European emissions membership fees and 27.5% of the net
transaction fees earned from the European emissions contracts
traded on our platform.
Components
of Expenses
Compensation
and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses primarily consist of
salaries, non-cash stock based compensation, bonuses, payroll
taxes, employer-provided medical and other benefit plan costs
and recruiting costs. Substantially all of our employees are
full-time employees. We capitalized and recorded as property and
equipment a portion of our compensation and benefits costs for
technology employees engaged in software development and the
enhancement of our electronic platform.
74
Professional
Services
Professional services expenses primarily consist of outside
legal, accounting and other professional and consulting services
expenses. We capitalize and record as property and equipment a
portion of the costs associated with fees for technology
consultants engaged in software development and enhancements to
our electronic platform. We expensed the remaining portion of
these fees in the month in which they were incurred.
Patent
Royalty
We entered into a long-term, non-exclusive licensing agreement
with a third party, which granted us the use of the third
partys patent. Under the agreement, we were required to
pay minimum annual license fees through the expiration date of
the patent on February 20, 2007 along with additional
royalty payments calculated quarterly based upon the volume of
certain futures transactions executed on our platform. This
licensing agreement ended on February 20, 2007 and no
payments are required after this date.
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
We incurred transaction costs directly relating to our proposed
merger with CBOT. We did not succeed with our proposed merger
with CBOT, and CME completed its acquisition of CBOT on
July 13, 2007. The merger-related transaction costs include
investment banking advisors, legal advisors, accounting
advisors, proxy advisors, public relation services and other
external costs directly related to the proposed transaction.
These costs were recorded primarily during the three months
ended June 30, 2007.
Selling,
General and Administrative
The major expense categories within selling, general and
administrative expenses include hosting expenses, hardware and
software support expenses, rent and occupancy expenses, and
marketing expenses. Cost of hosting expenses primarily consist
of the amounts we pay for the physical facilities, and
maintenance and other variable costs associated with securely
housing the hardware used to operate our electronic platform, as
well as our redundant disaster recovery facility. Cost of
hosting also includes participant network expenses we pay to
provide participants with direct connectivity to our platform.
Hardware and software support expenses primarily consist of
external hardware and software maintenance and support costs and
trade registration system costs. We currently lease office space
in Atlanta, New York, Houston, Chicago, London, Singapore,
Dublin, Winnipeg and Calgary. Our rent costs consist primarily
of rent expense for these properties. Our occupancy expenses
primarily relate to the use of electricity, telephone lines and
other miscellaneous operating costs. Marketing expenses
primarily consist of advertising, public relations and product
promotion and brand awareness campaigns, as well as for new and
existing products and services. These expenses also include our
participation in seminars, trade shows, conferences and other
industry events. Other selling, general and administrative costs
primarily consist of telephone and communications expense,
corporate insurance expense, travel expense, meals and
entertainment expense and dues, subscriptions and registration
expense.
Depreciation
and Amortization
We depreciate
and/or
amortize costs related to our property and equipment, including
computer and network equipment, software and internally
developed software, office furniture and equipment and leasehold
improvements. We compute depreciation expense using the
straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of the
assets, or in the case of leasehold improvements, the shorter of
the lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets, which
range from three to seven years. Gains on disposal of property
and equipment are included in other income, losses on disposals
of property and equipment are included in depreciation expense
and maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. We do not
amortize goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.
We amortize intangible assets with contractual or finite useful
lives, in each case over the estimated useful lives of the
intangible assets.
75
We capitalize costs, both internal and external, direct and
incremental, related to software developed or obtained for
internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Costs incurred in the application
development phase are capitalized and amortized over the useful
life of the software, for a period not to exceed three years.
Other
Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest income and
expense, as well as gains and losses on foreign currency
transactions. We generate interest income from the investment of
our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and
restricted cash. We incur interest expense on our interest on
outstanding indebtedness, the unused fee calculated under our
revolving credit facility and interest on the Russell license
agreement. We also recognized a gain during the year ended
December 31, 2007 for the sale of our former open-outcry
disaster recovery site in London.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of current and deferred
tax provisions relating to federal, state and local taxes, as
well as taxes related to foreign subsidiaries. We file a
consolidated United States federal income tax return and file
state income tax returns on a separate, combined or consolidated
basis in accordance with relevant state laws and regulations.
Our foreign subsidiaries are based in the United Kingdom, the
Netherlands and Canada and we file separate local country income
tax returns and take advantage of the United Kingdoms
group relief provisions when applicable. The difference between
the statutory income tax rate and our effective tax rate for a
given fiscal period is primarily a reflection of the tax effects
of our foreign operations, general business and tax credits, tax
exempt income, state income taxes and the non-deductibility of
certain expenses.
We recorded a tax benefit of $3.6 million in the second
quarter of 2007 related to the recognition of the indefinite
reinvestment provision of Accounting Principles Board, or APB,
Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income Taxes
Special Areas. The indefinite reinvestment provision of APB
Opinion No. 23 specifies that U.S. income taxes should
not be accrued on the undistributed earnings of a foreign
subsidiary if those earnings have been or will be indefinitely
invested outside the U.S. We had previously accrued
U.S. income taxes on a portion of the undistributed
earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $97.3 million, or 67.9%,
to $240.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $143.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net
income from our futures business segment increased
$73.9 million, or 141.6%, to $126.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $52.2 million for
the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to higher
transaction fee revenues, which benefited from our acquisition
of ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada in 2007. Net
income from our OTC business segment increased
$1.7 million, or 2.2%, to $79.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $77.5 million for the
comparable period in 2006. Net income in our OTC business
segment increased primarily due to higher transaction fee
revenues, offset by $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007 and $15.7 million in interest
expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net income from our market data business segment increased
$21.8 million, or 160.0%, to $35.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $13.6 million for
the comparable period in 2006. Net income in our market data
business segment increased primarily due to increased market
data sales in our futures business. Consolidated operating
income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to
61.6% for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 65.2% for
the comparable period in 2006. Consolidated net income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 41.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from 45.7% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Our consolidated revenues increased $260.5 million, or
83.0%, to $574.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $313.8 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase is primarily
76
attributable to increased trading volumes on our electronic
trading platform, revenues derived from ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada following their acquisition,
and increased non-transaction revenues, primarily market data
fees. A significant factor driving our revenues and volume
growth during this period was the continued growth in trading
volume of our energy futures and cleared OTC contracts as a
result of increasing participation in these markets and demand
to risk management within the energy sector.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $111.6 million,
or 102.2%, to $220.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $109.2 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase is primarily
attributable to $55.7 million in ICE Futures
U.S. operating expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2007, amortization expenses on the ICE Futures
U.S. intangibles of $8.2 million during year ended
December 31, 2007, $11.1 million in CBOT
merger-related transaction costs being incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2007, and higher compensation expenses
during the year ended December 31, 2007 due to non-cash
compensation expenses recognized under the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 123(R),
and an increase in our employee headcount.
Revenues
Transaction
Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $216.7 million, or
79.2%, to $490.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $273.6 million for the
comparable period in 2006. Transaction fees, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 85.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 87.2% for the comparable period in
2006.
Transaction fees generated in our futures business segment
increased $155.2 million, or 125.7%, to $278.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$123.4 million for the comparable period in 2006, while
increasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 48.5% for
the year ended December 31, 2007 from 39.3% for the
comparable period in 2006. The increase in transaction fees was
primarily due to our acquisitions of ICE Futures U.S. and
ICE Futures Canada on January 12, 2007 and August 27,
2007, respectively, an increase in our energy futures contract
volumes and a transaction fee increase effective July 1,
2007 for ICE Futures Europe, partially offset by an increase in
the transaction fee rebates for certain futures contracts.
Futures contract volumes increased for ICE Futures Europe
primarily due to increased liquidity brought by new market
participants due to electronic trading and increased trading of
the ICE WTI Crude futures contract, which was launched in
February 2006. Volumes at ICE Futures Europe increased 49.3% to
138.5 million contracts traded during the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 92.7 million contracts traded
during the comparable period in 2006. ICE Futures
U.S. adjusted its exchange fee rates effective
August 1, 2007, including adding a surcharge on certain
electronic trading products. Average transaction fees per
trading day for our futures business segment increased 132.7% to
$1.1 million per trading day for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $482,000 per trading day for the
comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our OTC business segment increased
$61.6 million, or 41.0%, to $211.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $150.2 million for
the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to increased
trading volumes. Transaction fees in this segment, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 36.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from 47.9% for the comparable
period in 2006. The decline in the percentage of consolidated
revenues is due to the inclusion of the ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada revenues in 2007 after their
acquisitions. The number of transactions or trades executed in
our OTC business segment increased by 55.8% to 5.9 million
trades for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
3.8 million trades for the comparable period in 2006.
Average transaction fees per trading day for our OTC business
segment increased 43.5% to $845,000 per trading day for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $589,000 per trading day for
the comparable period in 2006.
Increased volumes in our OTC business segment were primarily due
to increased trading activity in North American natural gas
and power markets as a result of the availability of cleared OTC
contracts, as well as increased liquidity brought by new market
participants and increased volatility relating to geopolitical
events, real and perceived supply and demand imbalances and
weather. Transaction fees generated by trading in
North American natural gas contracts increased
$37.9 million, or 32.3%, to $155.2 million for year
ended
77
December 31, 2007 from $117.3 million for the
comparable period in 2006. In addition, transaction fees
generated by trading in North American power contracts increased
$16.1 million, or 59.2%, to $43.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $27.2 million for the
comparable period in 2006. The continued growth in trading
volumes in OTC contracts can be attributed in part to the
continued introduction and use of cleared OTC contracts, which
eliminates the need for a counterparty to post capital against
each trade and also reduces requirements for entering into
multiple negotiated bilateral settlement agreements to enable
trading with other counterparties.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our
OTC business segment increased $2.5 million, or 71.3%, to
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$3.5 million for the comparable period in 2006.
Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, decreased to 1.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 1.1% for the comparable period in
2006.
Market
Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $36.2 million, or
105.6%, to $70.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $34.2 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to
the new terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data
vendors derived from ICE Futures U.S. following our
acquisition, increased data access fees in our OTC markets and
increased terminal fees and license fees that we receive from
data vendors in exchange for the provision of real-time price
information generated from ICE Futures Europe. During the year
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized
$28.9 million and $17.6 million, respectively, in data
access fees and terminal fees in our energy futures and OTC
businesses. During the year ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, we recognized $13.5 million and $11.5 million,
respectively, in terminal and license fees from data vendors in
our energy futures business. The increase in the market data
fees received from data vendors in our energy futures business
was due to both an increase in the average fee per terminal and
an increase in the number of terminals. We recognized
$20.9 million in terminal and license fees from data
vendors of ICE Futures U.S. during the year ended
December 31, 2007. ICE Futures U.S. adjusted its
market data rates effective June 1, 2007. Consolidated
market data fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
increased to 12.3% for the year ended December 31, 2007
from 10.9% for the comparable period in 2006.
Other
Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $7.6 million to
$13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $5.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to trade registration system fees of
$2.0 million recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2007 and $6.0 million in other revenues
relating to ICE Futures U.S. Other revenues for ICE Futures
U.S. include certification fees, grading fees, booth fees
and broker telephone billing fees. Consolidated other revenues,
as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 2.4% for
the year ended December 31, 2007 from 1.9% for the
comparable period in 2006.
Expenses
Compensation
and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased
$51.6 million, or 103.8%, to $101.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $49.8 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the inclusion of $25.9 million in compensation and
benefits expenses relating to ICE Futures U.S. in our
consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2007,
an increase in non-cash compensation expenses and an increase in
our employee headcount. The non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in our consolidated financial statements for our
stock options and restricted stock were $23.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to
$8.8 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs
recognized for the performance-based restricted stock that was
granted in December 2006. Our employee headcount increased from
226 employees
78
as of December 31, 2006 to 277 employees as of
December 31, 2007 (excluding the employees acquired as a
result of our acquisitions). ICE Futures U.S. employee
headcount decreased from 282 employees as of
January 12, 2007, the acquisition date, to
198 employees as of December 31, 2007. We had an
additional 31 employees as of December 31, 2007
relating to the other four acquisitions.
We expect that our compensation and benefits expenses will vary
from year to year as a percentage of total revenues due to
additional employees associated with the growth of our business,
accrual of bonuses, and due to non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Over
the next year, we expect compensation and benefits expenses to
increase from current levels. Consolidated compensation and
benefits expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
increased to 17.7% for year ended December 31, 2007 from
15.9% for the comparable period in 2006.
Professional
Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased
$11.7 million, or 102.3%, to $23.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $11.4 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the inclusion of $6.0 million in ICE Futures
U.S. professional services expenses in our consolidated
results for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
$3.5 million in professional services expenses incurred
relating to the establishment of ICE Clear Europe, our European
clearing house we are in the process of establishing.
We expect our professional services expenses to increase in
absolute terms in future periods in connection with the growth
of our business. As a percentage of total revenues, our
professional services expenses may decrease in future periods.
Consolidated professional services expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, increased to 4.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 3.6% for the comparable period in
2006.
Patent
Royalty
Patent royalty expenses decreased $7.3 million to
$1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$9.0 million for the comparable period in 2006.
Consolidated patent royalty expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 0.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 2.9% for the comparable period in
2006. The patent licensing agreement terminated on
February 20, 2007 and there were no patent royalty expenses
after this date.
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $11.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Consolidated CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 1.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $25.5 million, or 100.9%, to $50.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$25.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to $19.1 million of selling,
general and administrative expenses related to the business of
ICE Futures U.S. and increased costs of hosting expenses,
hardware and software support, marketing expenses and rent
expense that resulted from the growth of our business. We have
begun to relocate our technology operations and our support
systems, including our primary data center and our disaster
recovery site, to Chicago. Our disaster recovery site was
relocated from London to Chicago in June 2007. The primary data
center migrated from Atlanta to Chicago in January 2008.
Therefore, we have incurred some redundant costs at our
technology facilities in Atlanta, London and Chicago during this
transition period.
We expect our selling, general and administrative expenses to
increase in absolute terms in future periods in connection with
the growth of our business. As a percentage of total revenues,
our selling, general and
79
administrative expenses may decrease in future periods due to
anticipated revenue growth in excess of the selling, general and
administrative expenses growth. Consolidated selling, general
and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 8.8% for the year ended December 31,
2007 from 8.1% for the comparable period in 2006.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased
$19.0 million, or 138.5%, to $32.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $13.7 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the amortization on the acquired ICE Futures
U.S. intangibles of $8.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, the depreciation on the
$43.3 million in fixed asset additions incurred during the
year ended December 31, 2007 and the inclusion of
$4.5 million in ICE Futures U.S. depreciation expenses
in our consolidated results for the year ended December 31,
2007.
We anticipate that depreciation and amortization expenses will
increase in future periods due to the amortization of acquired
intangible assets and the increase in our capital expenditures
in 2007 and in the foreseeable future. Consolidated depreciation
and amortization expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 5.7% for the year ended December 31,
2007 from 4.4% for the comparable period in 2006.
Other
Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income decreased $3.0 million to
$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$7.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
decrease primarily related to the increase in interest expense,
partially offset by the gain recognized on the sale of an asset
and an increase in interest income. Interest expense increased
$18.4 million to $18.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $231,000 for the comparable period
in 2006 primarily due to $15.1 million in interest expense
and amortization associated with our $500.0 million credit
facility and interest expense of $3.1 million relating to
the Russell License. We recognized a gain of $9.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007 on the sale of our
former disaster recovery site used for our former open-outcry
physical trading floor in London. Interest income increased
$3.3 million to $11.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $8.6 million for the comparable
period in 2006 primarily due to an increase in our cash balances
from the net cash provided by operations.
Income
Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $48.5 million to
$117.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $69.3 million for the comparable period in 2006,
primarily due to the increase in our pre-tax income. Our
effective tax rate increased to 32.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 32.6% for the comparable period in
2006, primarily due to higher New York State and City tax rates
associated with the operations of ICE Futures U.S., which were
partially offset by a decrease in the amount of U.S. taxes
accrued on foreign earnings and an increase in tax credits
generated.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $102.9 million, or
254.5%, to $143.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $40.4 million for the
comparable period in 2005. Net income from our futures business
segment increased $34.3 million, or 192.4%, to
$52.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $17.8 million for the comparable period in 2005,
primarily due to higher transaction fees revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2006 and due to the
$4.8 million in floor closure costs incurred during the
year ended December 31, 2005. Net income from our OTC
business segment increased $59.2 million, or 322.7%, to
$77.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $18.3 million for the comparable period in 2005. Net
income in our OTC business segment increased primarily due to
significantly higher transaction fees revenues during the year
ended December 31, 2006 and due to the $15.0 million
settlement expense incurred
80
during the year ended December 31, 2005. Net income from
our market data business segment increased $9.4 million, or
221.2%, to $13.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $4.2 million for the comparable
period in 2005. Net income in our market data business segment
increased primarily due to increased market data sales and data
access fees in our OTC business during the year ended
December 31, 2006. Consolidated operating income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 65.2% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from 36.1% for the comparable
period in 2005. Consolidated net income, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, increased to 45.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 25.9% for the comparable period in
2005.
Our consolidated revenues increased $157.9 million, or
101.3%, to $313.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $155.9 million for the
comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily
attributable to increased trading volumes on our electronic
platform and increased market data fees. A significant factor
driving our revenues and volume growth during this period was
the continued growth in trading volumes of our cleared OTC
contracts and the launch of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract.
Consolidated operating expenses increased to $109.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$99.7 million for the comparable period in 2005,
representing an increase of 9.5%. This increase is primarily
attributable to higher compensation expenses during the year
ended December 31, 2006 due to an increase in our
discretionary bonus accrual and an increase in our employee
headcount, an increase in the non-cash compensation expenses
relating to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in 2006
and an increase in the patent royalty fees paid in 2006. These
increases were partially offset by floor closure costs of
$4.8 million incurred in 2005 in connection with our
decision to close our open-outcry trading floor in London, and
the $15.0 million litigation settlement payment made to EBS
in 2005.
Revenues
Transaction
Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $136.7 million, or
99.8%, to $273.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $137.0 million for the
comparable period in 2005. Transaction fees, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 87.2% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 87.9% for the comparable period in
2005.
Transaction fees generated in our futures business segment
increased $66.2 million, or 115.8%, to $123.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$57.2 million for the comparable period in 2005, while
increasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 39.3% for
the year ended December 31, 2006 from 36.7% for the
comparable period in 2005. The increase in transaction fees was
primarily due to an increase in our futures contract volumes.
Futures contract volumes increased primarily due to increased
liquidity brought by new market participants due to electronic
trading, the launch of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract in
February 2006 and increased volatility relating to geopolitical
events and real and perceived supply and demand imbalances.
Volumes in our futures business segment increased 120.5% to
92.7 million contracts traded during the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 42.1 million contracts traded
during the comparable period in 2005. Average transaction fees
per trading day increased 113.3% to $482,000 per trading day for
the year ended December 31, 2006 from $226,000 per trading
day for the comparable period in 2005.
Transaction fees generated in our OTC business segment increased
$70.4 million, or 88.3%, to $150.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from $79.8 million for
the comparable period in 2005, primarily due to increased
trading volumes. Transaction fees in this segment, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 47.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from 51.2% for the comparable
period in 2005. The number of transactions or trades executed in
our OTC business segment increased by 63.0% to 3.8 million
trades for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
2.3 million trades for the comparable period in 2005.
Average transaction fees per trading day increased 89.1% to
$589,000 per trading day for the year ended December 31,
2006 from $312,000 per trading day for the comparable period in
2005. The average revenues per transaction increased 15.1% for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the
comparable period in 2005. The increase in average revenues per
transaction was due in part to an increased number of higher
volume transactions, primarily as a result of market
participants generally trading in larger transaction sizes, and
a
81
change in the mix of contracts traded, with a larger number of
contracts traded related to commodities with higher commission
rates.
Increased volumes in our OTC business segment were primarily due
to increased trading activity in North American natural gas
and power markets as a result of the availability of cleared OTC
contracts, the launch of new cleared OTC contracts in 2006,
increased liquidity brought by new market participants and
increased volatility relating to geopolitical events and real
and perceived supply and demand imbalances. Cleared OTC
contracts eliminates the need for a counterparty to post capital
against each trade and also reduces requirements for entering
into multiple negotiated bilateral settlement agreements to
enable trading with other counterparties. Transaction fees
generated by trading in North American natural gas contracts
increased $57.4 million, or 95.8%, to $117.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$59.9 million for the comparable period in 2005. In
addition, transaction fees generated by trading in North
American power contracts increased $10.8 million, or 65.5%,
to $27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $16.4 million for the comparable period in 2005.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our
OTC business segment increased $1.9 million to
$3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$1.6 million for the comparable period in 2005. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, 585,009 trades were matched
through our electronic trade confirmation service, compared to
409,024 trades during the comparable period in 2005.
Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, increased to 1.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 1.0% for the comparable period in
2005.
Market
Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $19.6 million, or
133.8%, to $34.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $14.6 million for the
comparable period in 2005. This increase was primarily due to
increased data access fees in our OTC and energy futures
markets, increased terminal fees and license fees that we
receive from data vendors in exchange for the provision of
real-time price information generated from our energy futures
markets, increased market data fees in our OTC markets from the
market price validation service, and increased fees from view
only screen access and end of day reports. During the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we recognized
$17.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in data
access fees and terminal fees in our energy futures and OTC
business segments. During the year ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, we recognized $11.5 million and
$7.5 million, respectively, in terminal and license fees
from data vendors. The increase in the market data fees received
from data vendors were due to both an increase in the average
charge per terminal and an increase in the number of terminals.
We also continued to enroll new individual monthly subscribers
for our market price validation service and our view only screen
access service. Consolidated market data fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, increased to 10.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 9.4% for the comparable period in
2005.
Other
Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $1.7 million, or
39.7%, to $5.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2006 from $4.2 million for the comparable period in 2005.
This increase was primarily due to $1.5 million in trade
registration system fees which we recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2006. Consolidated other revenues, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 1.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from 2.7% for the comparable
period in 2005.
Expenses
Compensation
and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased
$14.0 million, or 39.2%, to $49.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $35.8 million for the
comparable period in 2005. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in the non-cash compensation expenses in accordance
with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on
January 1, 2006, an increase in our discretionary bonus
accrual for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to
the year ended December 31, 2005, and an increase in our
employee
82
headcount. The non-cash compensation expenses recognized in our
consolidated financial statements for our stock options and
restricted stock were $8.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $1.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. Our discretionary bonus
expense increased due to an increase in bonus eligible employees
and operating results substantially exceeding budgets for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Our employee headcount
increased from 203 employees as of December 31, 2005
to 226 employees as of December 31, 2006. Consolidated
compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 15.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 22.9% for the comparable period in
2005 primarily due to our increased revenues.
Professional
Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased
$1.3 million, or 12.6%, to $11.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $10.1 million for the
comparable period in 2005. This increase was primarily due to
costs that we incurred to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and other costs associated with being a public company,
partially offset by an aggregate decrease in legal fees related
to litigation with NYMEX and EBS, the former of which was
dismissed by a ruling in our favor on a motion for summary
judgment in the third quarter of 2005, which is currently on
appeal by NYMEX, and the latter of which was settled in the
second quarter of 2005. Consolidated professional services
expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to
3.6% for the year ended December 31, 2006 from 6.5% for the
comparable period in 2005.
Patent
Royalty
Patent royalty expenses increased $7.5 million to
$9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$1.5 million for the comparable period in 2005. The royalty
payments under the patent licensing agreement increased due to
increased energy futures volumes following the launch of
exclusive electronic trading during 2005 and due to the launch
of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract during February 2006.
Consolidated patent royalty expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, increased to 2.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from 1.0% for the comparable period in
2005.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $7.9 million, or 45.3%, to $25.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 from $17.4 million
for the comparable period in 2005. This increase was primarily
due to increased costs of hosting expenses, hardware and
software support expenses, bad debt expenses, insurance expenses
and travel and entertainment expenses and resulted from the
growth of our business. Consolidated selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, decreased to 8.1% for the year ended December 31,
2006 from 11.2% for the comparable period in 2005.
Floor
Closure Costs
Consolidated floor closure costs were $4.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, due to the closure of our
open-outcry trading floor in London in April 2005. Consolidated
floor closure costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
were 3.1% for the year ended December 31, 2005. We did not
have floor closure costs in the comparable period in 2006.
Settlement
Expense
Consolidated settlement expense was $15.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, due to the payment made to
settle litigation with EBS. Consolidated settlement expense, as
a percentage of consolidated revenues, was 9.6% for the year
ended December 31, 2005. We did not have settlement
expenses in the comparable period in 2006.
83
Depreciation
and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses decreased
$1.4 million, or 9.1%, to $13.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $15.1 million for the
comparable period in 2005. This decrease was due to certain
property and equipment purchased in 2002 and 2003 with estimated
useful lives of three years becoming fully depreciated over the
course of 2005 and 2006. The amortization of the eSpeed patent
license fee, included in depreciation and amortization expense,
totaled $2.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2006 and $2.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2005. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 4.4% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from 9.7% for the comparable
period in 2005.
Other
Income
Consolidated other income increased $4.1 million, or
108.7%, to $7.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $3.8 million for the comparable
period in 2005. The increase in other income was primarily due
to an increase in interest and investment income and a decrease
in interest expense. Interest and investment income increased
$5.5 million from the prior year primarily due to an
increase in our cash balances from the net proceeds received
from our initial public offering of common stock in November
2005 and from the cash flows generated from operations during
the year ended December 31, 2006. The level of interest
rates in the United States increased throughout 2006 and this
had an impact on our interest and investment income. Our
investments during the year ended December 31, 2006 also
included more taxable investments which generally earn a higher
pre-tax interest rate than the tax exempt investments that we
primarily invested in during the year ended December 31,
2005. Also, in connection with the change in our functional
currency of the majority of the U.K. subsidiaries to the
U.S. dollar on June 30, 2006, we converted the
majority of our cash in the U.K. from pounds sterling
denominated investments to U.S. dollar denominated
investments. The majority of our U.K. pounds sterling
investments had lower interest rates commensurate with the lower
U.K. interest rates over the last year. Interest expense
decreased $382,000 from the prior year primarily due to the
remaining $13.0 million outstanding balance under the
Wachovia revolving credit agreement being paid off with a
portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering of
common stock in November 2005.
The increase in other income was partially offset by foreign
currency transaction losses recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2006. ICE recognized net foreign currency
transaction losses of $288,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to net foreign currency
transaction gains of $1.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The foreign currency transaction gains
and losses primarily related to the settlement of foreign
currency assets, liabilities and payables that occur through our
foreign operations which are received in or paid in pounds
sterling due to the increase or decrease in the period-end
foreign currency exchange rates between periods. Through
June 30, 2006, the functional currency of our foreign
subsidiaries was pounds sterling. The average exchange rate of
pounds sterling to the U.S. dollar increased from 1.8128
for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 1.8543 for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Income
Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $49.7 million to
$69.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $19.6 million for the comparable period in 2005,
primarily due to the increase in our pre-tax income. Our
effective tax rate was 32.6% for both the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005. The effective tax rate for the
year ended December 31, 2006 is lower than the statutory
rate primarily due to our decision to reinvest
$51.0 million in undistributed overseas earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries during 2006, tax exempt income and
favorable state rates. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is lower than the statutory rate
primarily due to an increase in federal and state research and
development tax credits.
84
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth quarterly unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income for the periods presented. We
believe that this data has been prepared on substantially the
same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and
includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our
consolidated results of operations for the quarters presented.
This unaudited condensed consolidated quarterly data should be
read together with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The historical results for any quarter do not necessarily
indicate the results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2007(2)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
$
|
21,320
|
|
|
$
|
22,071
|
|
|
$
|
21,796
|
|
|
$
|
22,121
|
|
|
$
|
18,003
|
|
|
$
|
17,357
|
|
|
$
|
15,290
|
|
|
$
|
13,476
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
12,592
|
|
|
|
12,791
|
|
|
|
11,889
|
|
|
|
12,670
|
|
|
|
10,964
|
|
|
|
11,425
|
|
|
|
8,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar futures
|
|
|
12,160
|
|
|
|
12,829
|
|
|
|
14,823
|
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures products and options
|
|
|
26,328
|
|
|
|
25,642
|
|
|
|
22,277
|
|
|
|
18,449
|
|
|
|
8,733
|
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
|
5,988
|
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
OTC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
43,410
|
|
|
|
41,665
|
|
|
|
34,275
|
|
|
|
36,183
|
|
|
|
35,655
|
|
|
|
36,955
|
|
|
|
26,369
|
|
|
|
18,323
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
12,212
|
|
|
|
9,713
|
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
8,088
|
|
|
|
6,411
|
|
|
|
4,833
|
|
Other commodities markets
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Electronic trade confirmation services
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
23,306
|
|
|
|
17,225
|
|
|
|
15,846
|
|
|
|
14,019
|
|
|
|
9,647
|
|
|
|
9,748
|
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
3,248
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
159,296
|
|
|
|
151,735
|
|
|
|
136,654
|
|
|
|
126,608
|
|
|
|
95,264
|
|
|
|
94,662
|
|
|
|
73,591
|
|
|
|
50,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
34,913
|
|
|
|
23,009
|
|
|
|
21,717
|
|
|
|
21,758
|
|
|
|
14,214
|
|
|
|
12,987
|
|
|
|
11,932
|
|
|
|
10,617
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
6,714
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
2,690
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(1)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
12,170
|
|
|
|
13,002
|
|
|
|
12,130
|
|
|
|
7,629
|
|
|
|
7,016
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,546
|
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
7,748
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
62,769
|
|
|
|
50,871
|
|
|
|
60,125
|
|
|
|
46,965
|
|
|
|
31,080
|
|
|
|
29,280
|
|
|
|
26,175
|
|
|
|
22,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
100,864
|
|
|
|
76,529
|
|
|
|
79,643
|
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
|
|
65,382
|
|
|
|
47,416
|
|
|
|
27,653
|
|
Other income (expense), net(2)
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
8,221
|
|
|
|
3,216
|
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
31,437
|
|
|
|
32,593
|
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
|
|
32,278
|
|
|
|
18,408
|
|
|
|
24,468
|
|
|
|
17,302
|
|
|
|
9,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
64,652
|
|
|
$
|
66,681
|
|
|
$
|
53,693
|
|
|
$
|
55,586
|
|
|
$
|
48,992
|
|
|
$
|
43,645
|
|
|
$
|
30,967
|
|
|
$
|
19,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended June 30,
2007 include $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs, or $7.1 million after tax. Excluding
these costs, net of taxes, our OTC business |
85
|
|
|
|
|
net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 would
have been $60.7 million. See
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended March 31,
2007 include the results of ICE Futures U.S. for the period from
January 13, 2007 to March 31, 2007 and also include a
gain of $9.3 million, or $5.8 million after tax,
relating to the sale our former open-outcry disaster recovery
site in London. |
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations, growth and
cash needs primarily through income from operations and
borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal liquidity
and capital requirements have been to fund capital expenditures,
working capital, strategic acquisitions, and marketing and
development of our electronic trading platform. We may need to
incur additional debt or issue additional equity to make
strategic acquisitions or investments in the future. We financed
the cash portion of the merger with ICE Futures U.S. with
cash on hand and borrowings under a senior unsecured credit
facility discussed below. We financed the other acquisitions we
made in 2007 with cash on hand.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Short-Term Investments, Restricted Cash
and Restricted Short-Term Investments
We had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of
$119.6 million and $204.3 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We had
$141.0 million and $77.4 million in short-term
investments as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
and $19.6 million and $16.2 million in restricted cash
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We consider
all short-term, highly liquid investments with remaining
maturity dates of three months or less at the time of purchase
to be cash equivalents. We classify all investments with
remaining maturity dates in excess of three months and with
maturities less than one year and investments that we intend to
hold for less than one year as short-term investments. We
classify all investments that we intend to hold for more than
one year as long-term investments. We classify all cash that is
not available for general use, either due to FSA requirements or
through restrictions in specific agreements, as restricted cash.
The decrease in the cash and cash equivalents and in short-term
investments was primarily due to the cash we used in connection
with the acquisitions that we completed in 2007 offset by cash
flows generated from operations.
We invest a portion of our cash in excess of short-term
operating needs in investment-grade marketable debt securities
and municipal bonds through a third party asset management
company. We classify these investments as available-for-sale in
accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Available-for-sale investments are carried at their fair
values with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income
taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses, and declines in
value deemed to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale
investments, are recognized currently in earnings. We do not
have any investments classified as held-to-maturity or trading.
We have entered into an agreement with a third party asset
management company to manage our cash over a predetermined
operating cash threshold for an agreed upon fee. The agreement
specifies our investment objectives, as well as guidelines for
and restrictions on investments. The investment objectives are
to maximize income, preserve principal value, invest in
high-quality investment grade securities and to maintain
adequate liquidity to meet account demands. The investments
guidelines limit the types of investments that the third party
asset management company can enter into based on pre-approved
guidelines relating to types of securities, amount of
investments and maturity.
86
Cash
Flow
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
major components of net increases (decreases) in cash and cash
equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
287,781
|
|
|
$
|
150,689
|
|
|
$
|
49,812
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(637,388
|
)
|
|
|
(27,628
|
)
|
|
|
(117,120
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
264,759
|
|
|
|
58,339
|
|
|
|
30,329
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
(4,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(84,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
184,255
|
|
|
$
|
(41,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by operating activities was
$287.8 million, $150.7 million and $49.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities
primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash
items, including depreciation and amortization and the effects
of changes in working capital. Fluctuations in net cash provided
by operating activities are primarily attributable to increases
and decreases in our net income between periods and, to a lesser
extent, due to fluctuations in working capital. The
$137.1 million increase in net cash provided by operating
activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the
comparable period in 2006 is primarily due to the
$21.8 million increase in the market data business
segments net income and the $73.9 million increase in
the futures business segments net income for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from the comparable period in 2006.
The $100.9 million increase in net cash provided by
operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2006
from the comparable period in 2005 is primarily due to the
$59.2 million increase in the OTC business segments
net income and the $34.3 million increase in the futures
business segments net income for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from the comparable period in 2005. These
amounts were partially offset by $60.8 million and
$41.0 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Investing
Activities
Consolidated net cash used in investing activities was
$637.4 million, $27.6 million and $117.1 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These activities primarily relate to cash paid for
acquisitions and other intangibles, sales and purchases of
available-for-sale investments, capital expenditures in each
period for software, including internally developed software,
and for computer and network equipment. The cash paid for
acquisitions, net of cash acquired, for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $480.1 million and we paid
$52.7 million for the purchase of the Russell licensing
agreement. We had a net decrease (increase) in investments
classified as available-for-sale of ($59.6 million),
$36.9 million and ($107.8 million) for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and a net
(increase) decrease in restricted cash of ($6.4 million),
($3.6 million) and $4.4 million, respectively, due to
changes in the restricted cash balances between periods. We
incurred capitalized software development costs of
$12.3 million, $7.4 million and $5.1 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Capital expenditures totaled $31.0 million,
$12.4 million and $8.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These
capital expenditures primarily relate to hardware purchases to
continue the development and expansion of our electronic
platform and physical relocation of our primary data center and
disaster recovery site.
Financing
Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by financing activities was
$264.8 million, $58.3 million and $30.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Consolidated net cash provided by financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily
relates to the $250.0 million in proceeds
87
received from borrowings under the credit agreement and
$60.8 million in excess tax benefits generated from
stock-based compensation, partially offset by $25.5 million
in cash payments related to treasury shares received for
restricted stock and stock option tax payments as well as
$28.1 million in repayments under the credit agreement.
Consolidated net cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2006 primarily relates to the
$41.0 million excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation and $21.8 million in proceeds from the
exercise of common stock options. Consolidated net cash provided
by financing activities for the year ended December 31,
2005 primarily relates to the $55.1 million in net proceeds
received from the issuance of our common stock in the initial
public offering in November 2005, partially offset by the
repayment of our $25.0 million revolving credit facility.
Loan
Agreements
We financed the cash portion of the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings under a
senior unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Agreement, dated
January 12, 2007, as amended on August 24, 2007, that
we entered into with Wachovia, as Administrative Agent, Bank of
America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and the lenders named
therein. In connection with the Credit Agreement, we terminated
our previous $50.0 million credit facility with Wachovia,
under which no borrowings were outstanding. The Credit Agreement
provides for a term loan facility in the aggregate principal
amount of $250.0 million and a revolving credit facility in
the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million, which we
collectively refer to as the Credit Facilities. In connection
with the acquisition, we used the proceeds of the
$250.0 million term loan along with $166.8 million of
cash on hand to finance the $416.8 million cash component
of the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, we can borrow an aggregate principal amount of
up to $250.0 million under the revolving credit facility at
any time from the closing date of the Credit Agreement through
the third anniversary of the closing date of the merger with ICE
Futures U.S., which is January 12, 2010. We have agreed to
reserve $50.0 million of the $250.0 million available
under the revolving credit facility for use by ICE Clear
U.S. to provide liquidity in the event of a default by a
clearing member. The remaining amount under the revolving credit
facility can be used by us for general corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at our option, bear
interest on the principal amount outstanding at either:
(i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or (ii) a
base rate plus an applicable margin rate. The
base rate will be equal to the higher of
(i) Wachovias prime rate or (ii) the federal
funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from
0.50% to 1.125% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for
the base rate loans based on our total leverage ratio calculated
on a trailing twelve month period. Interest on each loan is
payable quarterly. As of December 31, 2007, we have a
$221.9 million three month LIBOR loan outstanding with a
stated interest rate of 5.46%, including the applicable margin
rate of 0.625%. For the borrowings under the term loan facility,
we began making payments on June 30, 2007, and will make
payments quarterly thereafter until the fifth anniversary of the
closing date of the merger with ICE Futures U.S., which will be
January 12, 2012. The Credit Agreement includes an
unutilized revolving credit commitment that is equal to the
unused maximum revolver amount multiplied by an applicable
margin rate and is payable in arrears on a quarterly basis. The
applicable margin rate ranges from 0.10% to 0.20% based on our
total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month
period. Based on this calculation, the applicable margin rate
was 0.125% at December 31, 2007.
The Credit Agreement requires us to use 100% of the net cash
proceeds raised from debt issuances or asset dispositions, with
certain limited exceptions, to prepay outstanding loans under
the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, we may prepay
the outstanding loans under the Credit Facilities, in whole or
in part, without premium or penalty upon written notice to the
Administrative Agent. The Credit Agreement contains affirmative
and negative covenants, including, but not limited to, leverage
and interest coverage ratios, as well as limitations or required
approvals for acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain
investments, the incurrence of additional debt or the creation
of liens and other fundamental changes to our business. We have
been and are currently in compliance with all applicable
covenants under the Credit Agreement.
ICE Clear Canada (formerly WCE Clearing Corporation) has
arranged a total of $3.0 million in a revolving standby
credit facility with the Royal Bank of Canada to provide
liquidity in the event of default by a clearing participant.
Borrowings under the revolving standby credit facility, which
are required to be
88
collateralized, bear interest based on the prime rate plus
0.75%. There are no borrowings outstanding under this facility
and ICE Clear Canada is currently in compliance with all
applicable covenants.
Future
Capital Requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including the rate of our trading volume growth, required
technology initiatives, regulatory compliance costs, the timing
and introduction of new products and enhancements to existing
products, and the continuing market acceptance of our world
class electronic platform. We currently expect to make capital
expenditures ranging between an aggregate of $36 million
and $40 million in 2008 which we believe will support the
enhancement of our leading edge technology and the continued
expansion of our futures, OTC and market data businesses. We
expect that these expenditures will focus on the further
expansion of our electronic futures and OTC participant base,
the expansion of distribution opportunities through possible
acquisitions of existing businesses or otherwise, the addition
of new products and services in our market data services
business, and the provision of back office service systems as
well as technical improvements to, and enhancements of, our
existing systems, products and services. We expect our
capitalized software development costs to remain relatively
consistent with our 2007 capitalized software development costs.
With the exception of potential acquisitions, we believe that
cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our
anticipated working capital needs and capital expenditure
requirements at least through the end of 2008. Our
$250.0 million revolving credit agreement is currently the
only significant agreement or arrangement that we have with
third parties to provide us with sources of liquidity and
capital resources. We currently have no borrowings under this
revolving credit agreement. In the event that we consummate any
strategic acquisitions or investments, or if we are required to
raise capital for any reason, we may need to incur additional
debt or issue additional equity to help raise the necessary
funds. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any
such financing on acceptable terms or at all.
Off-Balance
Sheet Entities
We currently do not have any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities, which have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our
contractual obligations (which we intend to fund from
operations) and commercial commitments as of December 31,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and interest
|
|
$
|
257,333
|
|
|
$
|
49,604
|
|
|
$
|
114,433
|
|
|
$
|
93,296
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Russell licensing agreement
|
|
|
126,659
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
27,720
|
|
|
|
39,917
|
|
|
|
48,522
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
107,507
|
|
|
|
20,570
|
|
|
|
51,445
|
|
|
|
18,435
|
|
|
|
17,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
491,499
|
|
|
$
|
80,674
|
|
|
$
|
193,598
|
|
|
$
|
151,648
|
|
|
$
|
65,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have excluded from the contractual obligations and commercial
commitments table above $6.8 million in uncertain tax
liabilities that are expected to be reversed within the next
five years. Of this amount, $462,000 is expected to be settled
within the next year, $2.5 million is expected to be
settled in the next two to three years and $3.8 million is
expected to be settled in the next four to five years. The
anticipated reduction in the balance of the liability is due
primarily to the anticipated expiration of the applicable
statute of limitations. At this time, we are not able to
determine which portion, if any, of the uncertain tax benefits
will be settled by means of a cash payment so it has not been
included in the table above.
89
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We provide adjusted net income, adjusted earnings per common
share on adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common
share on net income as additional information regarding our
operating results. We use these non-GAAP measures internally to
evaluate our performance and in making financial and operational
decisions. We believe that our presentation of these measures
provides investors with greater transparency and supplemental
data relating to our financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, we believe the presentation of these
measures is useful for period-to-period comparison of results
because the CBOT merger-related transaction costs, floor closure
costs and the settlement expense described below do not reflect
historical operating performance. While adjustments to the
redeemable stock put described below have been recorded in prior
years, they were recorded while the redeemable stock put
remained outstanding. The redeemable stock put was terminated in
November 2005. These measures are not in accordance with, or an
alternative to, U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles or GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP measures
used by other companies. Investors should not rely on any single
financial measure when evaluating our business. We strongly
recommend that investors review the GAAP financial measures
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including our consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto.
When viewed in conjunction with our GAAP results and the
accompanying reconciliation, we believe adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share provides a more complete
understanding of factors affecting our business than GAAP
measures alone. Our management uses adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share to evaluate operating performance
and management decisions made during the reporting period by
excluding certain items that we believe have less significance
on the day-to-day performance of our business. Our internal
budgets are based on adjusted net income and adjusted earnings
per share, and we report our adjusted net income and adjusted
earnings per share to our board of directors. In addition,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share are among
the criteria used in determining performance-based compensation.
We understand that analysts and investors regularly rely on
non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share, to assess operating performance. We
use adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share because
they more clearly highlight trends in our business that may not
otherwise be apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial
measures, since adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per
share eliminates from our results specific financial items that
have less bearing on our operating performance.
Adjusted
Net Income
Adjusted net income for the 2007 periods below is calculated by
adding the CBOT merger-related transaction costs to net income,
and it is presented net of tax. We incurred incremental direct
merger-related transaction costs of $10.9 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2007 and $11.1 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007 relating to our
proposed merger with CBOT. We did not succeed in our proposed
merger with CBOT and the CME completed its acquisition of CBOT
on July 13, 2007. The merger-related transaction costs
include investment banking advisors, legal advisors, accounting
advisors, proxy advisors, public relation services and other
external costs directly related to the proposed transaction.
Despite our plans to continue to explore and pursue acquisition
opportunities, we do not believe that this item is
representative of our past or future operating performance given
that the magnitude of the expense was well outside of our
historical expenses. We believe that the CBOT merger-related
transaction costs are infrequent and unusual and are not
representative of our historical operating performance because
we have not incurred similar significant merger-related costs
within the prior periods and do not expect to incur such costs
again within the next several years.
Adjusted net income for the 2005 periods below is calculated by
adding net income and two nonrecurring items, floor closure
costs and settlement expense, presented net of tax. We do not
believe these items are representative of our future operating
performance since both costs were incurred for specific reasons
outside of historical operations. We believe that the floor
closure costs and the settlement expense are unusual expenses
and they are not representative of historical operating
performance.
90
Adjusted
Earnings Per Share Redeemable Stock Put
Adjusted earnings per common share are calculated as
(i) net income divided by the weighted average common
shares outstanding and (ii) adjusted net income divided by
the weighted average common shares outstanding. These
calculations for the 2005 periods below exclude the redemption
adjustments relating to the redeemable stock put, which are used
to determine the net income available to common shareholders.
While the redemption adjustments to retained earnings have been
recorded in prior periods, no further adjustments will be
recorded following the termination of the redeemable stock put
in connection with our initial public offering. As a result, we
believe that it is appropriate to exclude this non-cash item to
provide shareholders with an adjusted earnings per share
calculation. We have no plans to issue a redeemable stock put in
the future.
The impact of outstanding stock options are considered to be
antidilutive in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
when a net loss available to common shareholders is reported.
Our outstanding stock options have not been included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share in 2005 due to the
$20.9 million net loss available to common shareholders as
a result of the $61.3 million charged to retained earnings
related to the redeemable stock put adjustments. Therefore, our
diluted earnings per share are computed in the same manner as
basic earnings per share in 2005. When the redeemable stock put
adjustments are excluded from the calculation of earnings per
share, the dilutive stock options need to be included in the
calculation of dilutive earnings per share due to the resulting
net income of $40.4 million in 2005.
The following table reconciles our 2007 net income to
adjusted net income and calculates adjusted earnings per common
share on adjusted net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
53,693
|
|
|
$
|
79,199
|
|
Add: CBOT merger-related transaction costs
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
Less: Effective tax rate benefit of CBOT merger-related
transaction costs
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
(3,906
|
)
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income
|
|
$
|
247,784
|
|
|
$
|
60,731
|
|
|
$
|
86,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share on net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings per common share on adjusted net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic
|
|
$
|
3.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
69,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
71,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The presentation below compares our 2005 operating performance
for the current periods, as adjusted, to our normal operating
performance in the comparable prior periods. The following table
reconciles net income (loss) to adjusted net income, net loss
available to common shareholders to net income and diluted
weighted
91
average common shares outstanding to adjusted diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding, and calculates adjusted
earnings per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,838
|
|
|
$
|
18,335
|
|
Add: Floor closure costs
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Settlement expense
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Less: Effective tax rate benefit of floor closure costs and
settlement expense
|
|
|
(7,119
|
)
|
|
|
(7,119
|
)
|
|
|
(1,685
|
)
|
|
|
(5,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income
|
|
$
|
53,105
|
|
|
$
|
12,554
|
|
|
$
|
20,967
|
|
|
$
|
27,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(20,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put
|
|
|
61,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
54,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings per common share on adjusted net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings per common share on net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted
|
|
|
54,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, FASB, issued Interpretation No. 48, or
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance
on de-recognition of tax benefits, classification on the balance
sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. We adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the
adoption, we recognized a charge of $83,000 to the
January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. As of the
adoption date, we had unrecognized tax benefits of
$13.2 million of which $5.0 million, if recognized,
would affect our effective tax rate. We recorded a decrease to
unrecognized tax benefits of $1.2 million as of
December 31, 2007, of which $2.4 million increased
income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007. We
recognize interest accruals related to income tax uncertainties
as a
92
component of interest expense. Any related penalties, if
incurred, would be included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Interest expense related to the
unrecognized tax benefits totaled $478,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Accrued interest and penalties were
$1.5 million and $1.9 million as of January 1,
2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands fair value measurement disclosures.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for us beginning in fiscal
year 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of the pending
adoption of SFAS No. 157 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected are reported in earnings.
SFAS No. 159 will be effective for us beginning in
fiscal year 2008. We do not expect that we will elect the fair
value option under SFAS No. 159, and we do not expect
SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our
business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations. The impact of, and any associated risks related to,
these policies on our business operations is discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. For a
detailed discussion on the application of these and other
accounting policies, see note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these
accounting principles requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities, at the date of our financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period.
We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis,
including those related to the accounting matters described
below. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical
experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances when we make these estimates and
judgments. Based on these factors, we make estimates and
judgments about, among other things, the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from market
prices or other independent sources and about the recognition
and characterization of our revenues and expenses. The values
and results based on these estimates and judgments could differ
significantly under different assumptions or conditions and
could change materially in the future.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies,
among others, affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements and could materially increase or decrease our
reported results, assets and liabilities.
Goodwill
and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
We have significant intangible assets related to goodwill and
other acquired intangibles. Our determination of the fair value
of the intangible assets, related estimated useful lives of
intangible assets and whether or not these assets are impaired
requires us to make significant judgments. If we change our
strategy or if market conditions shift, our judgments may
change, which may result in adjustments to recorded asset
balances. As of December 31, 2007, we had goodwill of
$1,009.7 million and net other intangible assets of
$537.7 million relating to our acquisitions, our purchase
of trademarks and Internet domain names from various third
parties, and the Russell licensing agreement. Under the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, we do not amortize goodwill or other
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Intangible
assets with finite useful lives are amortized over the lesser of
their contractual or estimated useful lives.
In connection with our acquisitions, assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values.
We have recorded goodwill for the excess of the purchase price
of our acquisitions over the fair
93
value of identifiable net assets acquired, including other
identified intangible assets. We recognize specifically
identifiable intangibles when a specific right or contract is
acquired. Our fair value assumptions are based on
managements judgment and require the use of significant
estimates and assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows.
In performing the purchase price allocation, we consider, among
other factors, the intended future use of acquired assets,
analyses of historical financial performance and estimates of
future performance of the acquired business.
At the acquisition date, a preliminary allocation of the
purchase price is recorded based upon a preliminary valuation.
We continue to review and validate estimates, assumptions and
valuation methodologies underlying the preliminary valuation
during the purchase price allocation period. Accordingly, these
estimates and assumptions are subject to change, which could
have a material impact on our financial statements. The purchase
price allocation period ends when we have obtained all of the
information and that is known to be obtainable, which usually
does not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.
We test goodwill in each of our reporting units for impairment
at least annually in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142 by comparing the carrying value of the
reporting unit with its estimated fair value. If the carrying
value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value,
then an impairment loss is recorded if and to the extent that
the carrying value of the goodwill is in excess of the implied
fair value of the goodwill in accordance with the two-step
process in SFAS No. 142. Other finite-lived intangible
assets are evaluated for impairment under
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under SFAS No. 144,
we are required to evaluate whether events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our
depreciable assets to be held and used may not be recoverable.
An estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by these
long-lived assets is then compared to the carrying value of
those assets to determine if the asset is recoverable. If an
asset is not recoverable, the loss is measured as the difference
between fair value and carrying value of the impaired asset.
Fair value of an asset is based on various valuation techniques,
including discounted cash flow analyses.
In assessing whether goodwill and other intangible assets are
impaired, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future
cash flows, estimated long-term growth rates of our business,
the period over which cash flows will occur, and other factors
to determine the fair value of our assets. These estimates and
assumptions require managements judgment, and changes to
these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the
determination of fair value
and/or
impairment for each reporting unit. Future events could cause us
to conclude that indications of goodwill or intangible asset
impairment exist. Impairment may result from, among other
things, deterioration in the performance of our business,
adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws
and regulations, competition, or the sale or disposition of a
reporting unit. Any resulting impairment loss could have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Our goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment annually in our fiscal fourth quarter
or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that value may be impaired. The reporting unit levels for our
impairment testing of goodwill are the OTC reporting unit, the
ICE Futures U.S. reporting unit, the ICE Futures Europe
reporting unit and the ICE Futures Canada reporting unit and the
market date reporting unit. This analysis has not resulted in
impairment through December 2007.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
We capitalize costs related to software developed or obtained
for internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Costs incurred during the
preliminary project work stage or conceptual stage, such as
determining the performance requirements, system requirements
and data conversion, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in
the application development phase, such as coding, testing for
new software and upgrades that result in additional
functionality, are capitalized and are amortized using the
straight-line method over the useful life of the software, not
to exceed three years. Amortization of these capitalized costs
begins only when the software becomes ready for its intended
use. Costs incurred during the post-implementation/operation
stage, including training costs and maintenance costs, are
expensed as incurred. We capitalized internally developed
software costs of $12.3 million, $7.4 million and
$5.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Determining whether particular
costs incurred are more properly attributable to the preliminary
or conceptual stage, and thus expensed, or to the application
development phase, and thus capitalized and amortized, depends
on subjective judgments about the nature of the development
work,
94
and our judgments in this regard may differ from those made by
other companies. General and administrative costs related to
developing or obtaining such software are expensed as incurred.
We review our capitalized software development costs and our
other long-lived assets for impairment at each quarterly balance
sheet date and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets
should be assessed. Our judgments about impairment are based in
part on subjective assessments of the usefulness of the relevant
software and may differ from comparable assessments made by
others. We have not recorded any impairment charges since our
formation. To analyze recoverability, we estimate undiscounted
net future cash flows over the remaining life of such assets. If
these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount,
impairment would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of
assets to their estimated fair value with a corresponding charge
to earnings. We believe that our capitalized software
development costs are appropriately valued in our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 7(A).
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of
business. This market risk consists primarily of interest rate
risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, restricted cash, long-term investments, current and
long-term debt and foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Interest
Rate Risk
We have exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relating to our cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, current and noncurrent restricted cash and
indebtedness. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, our cash
and cash equivalents, short-term investments and current and
noncurrent restricted cash were $283.2 million and
$297.8 million, respectively, of which $16.0 million
and $23.5 million, respectively, were denominated in pounds
sterling and Canadian dollars. The remaining investments are
denominated in U.S. dollars. We would not expect our
operating results or cash flows to be significantly affected by
changes in market interest rates. We do not use our investment
portfolio for trading or other speculative purposes.
At December 31, 2007, we had outstanding a
$221.9 million term loan under our Credit Facilities which
is subject to interest rate risk. A hypothetical 100 basis
point increase in long-term interest rates would decrease annual
pre-tax earnings by $2.2 million, assuming no change in the
volume or composition of our debt.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have foreign currency transaction risk related to the
settlement of foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities
and payables that occur through our foreign operations which are
received in or paid in pounds sterling due to the increase or
decrease in the period-end foreign currency exchange rates
between periods. We had foreign currency transaction gains
(losses) of $842,000, ($288,000) and $1.5 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
primarily attributable to the fluctuations of pounds sterling
relative to the U.S. dollar. The average exchange rate of
pounds sterling to the U.S. dollar increased from 1.8128
for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 1.8434 for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and then increased to 2.0020 for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
We have historically generated a significant portion of our
revenues from sales to participants located outside of the
United States, principally in the United Kingdom. Of our
consolidated revenues, 1.2%, 7.2% and 38.3% were denominated in
pounds sterling or Canadian dollars for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Of our
consolidated operating expenses, 15.9%, 29.8% and 48.1% were
denominated in pounds sterling or Canadian dollars for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As
the pounds sterling or Canadian dollar exchange rate changes,
the U.S. equivalent of revenues and expenses denominated in
foreign currencies changes accordingly. Our operating expenses,
certain of which are denominated in pounds sterling, increased
$2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the same period in the prior year due to the 8.6%
increase in the average exchange rate of pounds sterling to the
U.S. dollar for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the same period in 2006. A 10% adverse change in the
underlying foreign currency exchange rates would not be
significant to our financial condition or results of operations.
95
As of the second quarter of 2006, we began charging exchange
fees in U.S. dollars rather than in pounds sterling in our
key U.K. futures contracts, including crude oil and heating oil
contracts. All sales in our business are now denominated in
U.S. dollars, except for some small futures contracts at
ICE Futures Europe and sales through ICE Futures Canada. We may
experience substantial gains or losses from foreign currency
transactions in the future given there are still net assets or
net liabilities and expenses of our U.K. and Canadian
subsidiaries financial statements that are denominated in pounds
sterling or Canadian dollars. Our U.K. operations in some
instances function as a natural hedge because we generally hold
an equal amount of monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in pounds sterling.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of ICE Futures
Europe and the other U.K. subsidiaries have historically been
denominated in pounds sterling, the functional currency of our
U.K. subsidiaries. We had foreign currency translation risk
equal to our net investment in our U.K. subsidiaries. The
financial statements of our U.K. subsidiaries were translated
into U.S. dollars using current rates of exchange, with
gains or losses included in the cumulative translation
adjustment account, a component of shareholders equity.
Effective as of July 1, 2006, the functional currency of
the majority of our U.K. subsidiaries became the
U.S. dollar. The functional currency of an entity is the
currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates. Normally, it is the currency of the environment in
which an entity primarily generates and expends cash. Once the
functional currency of a foreign entity is determined, that
determination should be used consistently unless significant
changes in economic facts and circumstances indicate clearly
that the functional currency has changed. A change in functional
currency should be accounted for prospectively, and previously
issued financial statements should not be restated for a change
in functional currency. In addition, if the functional currency
changes from a foreign currency to the reporting currency, as is
the case with us, translation adjustments for prior periods
should not be removed from equity and the translated amounts for
non-monetary assets as the end of the prior period become the
accounting basis for those assets in the period of the change
and subsequent periods. The functional currency switched based
on various economic factors and circumstances, including the
fact that beginning in the second quarter of 2006, ICE Futures
Europe began to charge and collect exchange fees in
U.S. dollars rather than pounds sterling in its key futures
contracts, including crude oil and heating oil contracts. We
will no longer recognize any translation adjustments in the
consolidated financial statements subsequent to June 30,
2006 for those U.K. subsidiaries that have switched their
functional currency to the U.S. dollar.
In connection with our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada in
August 2007, we now have foreign currency translation risk equal
to our net investment in certain Canadian subsidiaries. The
revenues, expenses and financial results of these Canadian
subsidiaries are denominated in Canadian dollars, which is the
functional currency of these subsidiaries. The financial
statements of these subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. dollars using current rate of exchange, with gains or
losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment
account, a component of shareholders equity. As of
December 31, 2007, the portion of our shareholders
equity attributable to accumulated other comprehensive income
from foreign currency translation was $33.0 million. The
period-end foreign currency exchange rate for pounds sterling to
the U.S. dollar increased from 1.7188 as of
December 31, 2005 to 1.9586 as of December 31, 2006
and further increased to 1.9843 as of December 31, 2007.
The period-end foreign currency exchange rate for Canadian
dollar to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.0515 as of
August 27, 2007, the acquisition date of ICE Futures
Canada, to 0.9881 as of December 31, 2007.
Impact of
Inflation
We have not been adversely affected by inflation as
technological advances and competition have generally caused
prices for the hardware and software that we use for our
electronic platform to remain constant or to decline. In the
event of inflation, we believe that we will be able to pass on
any price increases to our participants, as the prices that we
charge are not governed by long-term contracts.
96
REPORT OF
MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Our management is responsible for the preparation and integrity
of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The financial statements were prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the
circumstances and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on
our best judgments and estimates. Financial information in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is consistent with that in the financial statements.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange
Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements. Our internal control over
financial reporting is supported by a program of internal audits
and appropriate reviews by management, written policies and
guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified
personnel and a written Code of Business Conduct adopted by our
Board of Directors, applicable to all Company Directors and all
officers and employees of our Company and subsidiaries.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and
even when determined to be effective, can only provide
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, comprised solely
of directors who are independent in accordance with the
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards,
the Exchange Act and our Board of Director Governance
Principles, meets with the independent auditors, management and
internal auditors periodically to discuss internal control over
financial reporting and auditing and financial reporting
matters. The Audit Committee reviews with the independent
auditors the scope and results of the audit effort. The Audit
Committee also meets periodically with the independent auditors
and the internal auditors without management present to ensure
that the independent auditors and the internal auditors have
free access to the Audit Committee. Our Audit Committees
Report will be included in our 2008 Proxy Statement.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, management believes that
we maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007.
As permitted by SEC regulations, our management has excluded ICE
Futures U.S., Inc. and ICE Futures Canada, Inc. from its
assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007 since they were acquired in purchase
business combinations in 2007. ICE Futures U.S., Inc. and ICE
Futures Canada, Inc. are wholly-owned subsidiaries with total
assets of $988.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and
total revenues of $127.1 million since the dates of
acquisition.
Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a
registered public accounting firm, are appointed by the Audit
Committee, subject to ratification by our shareholders.
Ernst & Young LLP has audited and reported on our
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. The reports of the
independent auditors are contained in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
|
|
/s/ Scott
A. Hill
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Scott A. Hill
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2008
|
|
February 11, 2008
|
98
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
We have audited IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Report of Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
managements assessment of and conclusion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of ICE Futures U.S., which is
included in the 2007 consolidated financial statements of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and constituted
$976.8 million and $52.7 million of total and net
assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2007 and
$124.8 million and $41.8 million of revenues and net
income, excluding intercompany charges, respectively, for the
year then ended. Additionally, managements assessment of
and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting did not include the internal controls of ICE
Futures Canada, which is included in the 2007 consolidated
financial statements of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
constituted $11.6 million and $2.2 million of total
and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2007 and
$2.3 million and $0.6 million of revenues and net
income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of
internal control over financial reporting of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. also did not include an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of
ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada.
In our opinion, IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO
criteria.
99
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
Subsidiaries and our report dated February 11, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 11, 2008
100
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders equity,
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Notes 2, 11, and 12 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, effective January 1, 2006 and Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective
January 1, 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 11,
2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 11, 2008
101
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
|
$
|
204,257
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
|
|
16,193
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
77,354
|
|
Customer accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $370 and $985
at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
51,241
|
|
|
|
31,673
|
|
Related-parties
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
Asset held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,698
|
|
Current deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,142,094
|
|
|
|
340,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,009,687
|
|
|
|
79,575
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
537,722
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Cost method investments
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
38,738
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
|
|
6,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,590,727
|
|
|
|
126,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
$
|
493,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
27,811
|
|
|
$
|
13,228
|
|
Accrued salaries and benefits
|
|
|
23,878
|
|
|
|
18,135
|
|
Current portion of licensing agreement
|
|
|
10,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
11,687
|
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
7,461
|
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
910,961
|
|
|
|
37,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
108,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
184,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion of licensing agreement
|
|
|
89,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned government grant
|
|
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
408,528
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,319,489
|
|
|
|
38,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at December 31,
2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 194,275 shares
authorized; 70,963 and 59,596 shares issued at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively; 69,711 and
58,125 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,252 and 1,471 shares at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(30,188)
|
|
|
|
(9,748)
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,043,971
|
|
|
|
245,030
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
431,708
|
|
|
|
191,179
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
30,655
|
|
|
|
27,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,476,856
|
|
|
|
454,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
$
|
493,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
102
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net (including $13,657 and $15,411 with
related-parties in 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
$
|
490,358
|
|
|
$
|
273,629
|
|
|
$
|
136,976
|
|
Market data fees (including $412 and $198 with related-parties
in 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
70,396
|
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
|
|
14,642
|
|
Other (including $1,729, $1,984 and $1,934 with related-parties
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
574,293
|
|
|
|
313,799
|
|
|
|
155,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
101,397
|
|
|
|
49,750
|
|
|
|
35,753
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
23,047
|
|
|
|
11,395
|
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
9,039
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
50,759
|
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
17,395
|
|
Floor closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
Settlement expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
220,730
|
|
|
|
109,164
|
|
|
|
99,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
353,563
|
|
|
|
204,635
|
|
|
|
56,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
11,865
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(18,641)
|
|
|
|
(231)
|
|
|
|
(613)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
11,647
|
|
|
|
(426)
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
358,434
|
|
|
|
212,543
|
|
|
|
59,995
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
|
|
19,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,319)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
(20,909)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
103
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Available-
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Series 1
|
|
|
Series 2
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
For-Sale
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
51,537
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
|
(1,534)
|
|
|
$
|
(5,541)
|
|
|
$
|
39,886
|
|
|
$
|
(6,087)
|
|
|
$
|
68,820
|
|
|
$
|
37,043
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,516)
|
|
|
$
|
132,149
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,705)
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(15,548)
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
(2,467)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,319)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,319)
|
|
Cancellation of redeemable stock put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,901
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,139
|
|
Conversion of Class A common stock, Series 2 into
common stock
|
|
|
15,900
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,900)
|
|
|
|
(159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
35,782
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(1,534)
|
|
|
|
(5,541)
|
|
|
|
177,602
|
|
|
|
(6,899)
|
|
|
|
47,911
|
|
|
|
21,338
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(2,450)
|
|
|
|
232,623
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
(93)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(188)
|
|
|
|
21,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,818
|
|
Reversal of deferred stock compensation in connection with
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,899)
|
|
|
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class A common stock, Series 1 and
Series 2 into common stock
|
|
|
38,748
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(2,863)
|
|
|
|
(29)
|
|
|
|
(35,885)
|
|
|
|
(359)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69)
|
|
|
|
(4,765)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,765)
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(746)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
59,596
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,471)
|
|
|
|
(9,748)
|
|
|
|
245,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,179
|
|
|
|
29,863
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(2,450)
|
|
|
|
454,468
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
(472)
|
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,459
|
|
Issuance of shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,663
|
|
Treasury shares received during acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(197)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197)
|
|
Treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181)
|
|
|
|
(24,814)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,814)
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
5,043
|
|
|
|
(5,043)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83)
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
70,963
|
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(1,252)
|
|
|
$
|
(30,188)
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,971
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
431,708
|
|
|
$
|
33,046
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
(2,450)
|
|
|
$
|
1,476,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
104
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $655,
$830 and ($476) for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
(15,705
|
)
|
Change in available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $22,
($34) and $34 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
Change in fair value of net investment hedges, net of tax of $40
for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
243,856
|
|
|
$
|
151,700
|
|
|
$
|
24,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
105
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(9,268)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(615)
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
|
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
(171)
|
|
|
|
(882)
|
|
|
|
(770)
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
23,595
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Issuance of vested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(3,222)
|
|
|
|
(5,345)
|
|
|
|
(2,356)
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(60,812)
|
|
|
|
(40,996)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash floor closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net
|
|
|
(4,919)
|
|
|
|
(19,397)
|
|
|
|
(5,447)
|
|
Related-parties
|
|
|
(329)
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
(288)
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(2,359)
|
|
|
|
(4,310)
|
|
|
|
(2,778)
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
(510)
|
|
|
|
(1,320)
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
|
|
37,791
|
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued salaries and benefits, and other
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(3,400)
|
|
|
|
16,335
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
47,169
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
287,781
|
|
|
|
150,689
|
|
|
|
49,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(30,999)
|
|
|
|
(12,377)
|
|
|
|
(8,610)
|
|
Capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
(12,267)
|
|
|
|
(7,438)
|
|
|
|
(5,123)
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(480,114)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
(61,099)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost method investment
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
|
(36,937)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
272,771
|
|
|
|
346,090
|
|
|
|
58,755
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
(332,357)
|
|
|
|
(309,227)
|
|
|
|
(166,575)
|
|
Capitalized acquisition costs
|
|
|
(121)
|
|
|
|
(4,124)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(6,431)
|
|
|
|
(3,615)
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(637,388)
|
|
|
|
(27,628)
|
|
|
|
(117,120)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
60,812
|
|
|
|
40,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482)
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
55,139
|
|
Proceeds from credit facility
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of credit facilities
|
|
|
(28,125)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000)
|
|
Issuance costs for credit facilities
|
|
|
(2,375)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194)
|
|
Payments relating to treasury shares received for restricted
stock and stock option tax payments and exercises
|
|
|
(25,484)
|
|
|
|
(4,953)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
22,006
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
264,759
|
|
|
|
58,339
|
|
|
|
30,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
(4,218)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(84,660)
|
|
|
|
184,255
|
|
|
|
(41,197)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
204,257
|
|
|
|
20,002
|
|
|
|
61,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
|
$
|
204,257
|
|
|
$
|
20,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
54,255
|
|
|
$
|
38,279
|
|
|
$
|
19,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
14,586
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(61,319)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of redeemable stock put
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
106
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
Business and Organization
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (the Company) owns
and operates an Internet-based, global electronic marketplace
for facilitating trading in futures and over-the-counter
(OTC) commodities and derivative financial products
(the Platform). The Company owns 100% of ICE Futures
Europe (formerly known as ICE Futures), which operates as a
United Kingdom (U.K.) Recognized Investment Exchange
for the purpose of trading energy commodity futures and options
contracts. The Company also owns 100% of the Board of Trade of
the City of New York, Inc., or NYBOT, which, effective
September 3, 2007, changed its name to ICE Futures U.S.,
Inc. (ICE Futures U.S.). The Company acquired ICE
Futures U.S. on January 12, 2007 and it operates as a
United States (U.S.) Designated Contract Market for
the purpose of trading soft commodity and financial futures and
options contracts. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, the
Company also has offices in London, New York, Chicago, Houston,
Calgary, Winnipeg, Dublin and Singapore.
The Company currently operates the OTC markets as an exempt
commercial market (ECM) pursuant to the Commodity
Exchange Act (CEA) and regulations of the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). As an ECM, the
Company is required to file a notice with the CFTC, provide the
CFTC with access to its trading system and certain trading
reports and respond to requests for information or records from
the CFTC.
ICE Futures Europe is subject to extensive regulation in the
U.K. by the Financial Services Authority, or FSA, in accordance
with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. ICE Futures
Europe is responsible for maintaining financial resources
sufficient for the proper performance of its functions as a
Recognized Investment Exchange, and, in order to satisfy this
requirement, is obligated to maintain a minimum amount of liquid
financial assets at all times.
ICE Futures U.S. is subject to extensive regulation in the
U.S. by the CFTC under the CEA. The CEA generally requires
that futures trading conducted in the U.S. be conducted on
a commodity exchange designated as a contract market by the
CFTC. It also establishes non-financial criteria for an exchange
to be designated to list futures and options contracts.
Designation as a contract market for the trading of specified
futures contracts is non-exclusive. This means that the CFTC may
designate additional exchanges as contract markets for trading
in the same or similar contracts. As a designated contract
market, ICE Futures U.S. is a self-regulatory organization
that has instituted detailed rules and procedures to comply with
the core principles applicable to it under the CEA.
ICE Futures U.S. also has surveillance and compliance
operations and procedures to monitor and enforce compliance with
its rules, and ICE Futures U.S. is periodically audited by
the CFTC with respect to the fulfillment of ICE Futures
U.S.s self-regulatory programs in these areas.
The Company does not risk its own capital by engaging in any
trading activities or by extending credit to market participants.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation. As discussed in Note 3, the Company
completed several acquisitions in 2007 and has included the
financial results of these companies in its consolidated
financial statements effective from the respective acquisition
dates forward.
107
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the
Companys management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported
amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts
could differ from those estimates.
Segment
and Geographic Information
The Company currently has three reportable operating segments:
its OTC business segment, its futures business segment, and its
market data business segment. All three operate across domestic
and international markets. Substantially all of the
Companys identifiable assets are located in the U.S., the
U.K. and Canada.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments
with remaining maturities at the purchase date of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted
Cash
The Company classifies all cash and cash equivalents that are
not available for general use by the Company, either due to
Financial Services Authority requirements or through
restrictions in specific agreements, as restricted in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets (Note 4).
Short-Term
and Long-Term Investments
The Company invests a portion of its cash in excess of
short-term operating needs in investment-grade marketable debt
securities and municipal bonds (Note 5). These investments
are classified as available-for-sale in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities. The Company does not have any investments
classified as held-to-maturity or trading. Available-for-sale
investments are carried at their fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized
gains and losses, and declines in value deemed to be
other-than-temporary on available-for-sale investments, are
recognized currently in earnings.
The Company determines the appropriate classification of its
investments in marketable debt securities and municipal bonds at
the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation at each
balance sheet date. The Company may or may not hold securities
with stated maturities greater than twelve months until
maturity. In response to changes in the availability of and the
yield on alternative investments as well as liquidity
requirements, the Company occasionally sells these securities
prior to their stated maturities. As these securities are viewed
by the Company as available to support current operations and
requirements, certain marketable debt securities and municipal
bonds with maturities beyond 12 months are classified as
current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Investments that the Company intends to hold for more than one
year are classified as long-term investments in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Cost
Method Investments
The Company uses the cost method to account for investments in
companies that the Company does not control and for which the
Company does not have the ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial policies (Note 6).
108
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Margin
Deposits and Guaranty Funds
Original margin, variation margin and guaranty fund deposits
held by the Companys clearing houses for clearing members
may be in the form of cash, money market mutual fund shares,
U.S. Government obligations, Canadian Government
obligations, or letters of credit. Cash original margin,
variation margin and guaranty fund deposits are reflected in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as a current asset and
a current liability. Cash received is invested by the
Companys clearing houses, primarily in overnight
transactions in money market mutual funds. Any interest earned
on the guaranty fund cash deposits accrues to the Company and is
included in interest and investment income in the consolidated
statements of income and any interest earned on the cash
original margin deposits accrues to the clearing members. The
amount of margin deposits on hand will fluctuate over time as a
result of, among other things, the extent of open positions held
at any point in time by market participants in contracts and the
margin rates then in effect for such contracts.
Non-cash original margin and guaranty fund deposits are not
reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These
securities are held in safekeeping and are only pledged to the
Companys clearing houses and the Companys clearing
houses do not take legal ownership. Interest and gain or loss on
securities deposited to satisfy original margin or guaranty fund
requirements accrues to the clearing members.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, reduced by
accumulated depreciation (Note 7). Depreciation and
amortization expense related to property and equipment is
computed using the straight-line method based on estimated
useful lives of the assets, or in the case of leasehold
improvements, the shorter of the initial lease term or the
estimated useful life of the asset. The Company reviews the
remaining estimated useful lives of its property and equipment
at each balance sheet date and will make adjustments to the
estimated remaining useful lives whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the remaining useful lives have
changed. Gains on disposals of property and equipment are
included in other income and losses on disposals of property and
equipment are included in depreciation expense. Maintenance and
repairs are expensed as incurred.
Software
Development Costs
The Company capitalizes costs, both internal and external direct
and incremental costs, related to software developed or obtained
for internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Software development costs
incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stage are
expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the
application development stage are capitalized and are amortized
using the straight-line method over the useful life of the
software, not to exceed three years. Amortization of these
capitalized costs begins only when the software becomes ready
for its intended use. General and administrative costs related
to developing or obtaining such software are expensed as
incurred.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded goodwill for the excess of the purchase
price for its acquisitions over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired, including other identified intangible
assets (Note 8). The Company recognizes specifically
identifiable intangibles when a specific right or contract is
acquired. Goodwill has been allocated to reporting units for
purposes of impairment testing based on the portion of synergy,
cost savings and other expected future cash flows expected to
benefit the reporting units at the time of the acquisition.
The Company tests its goodwill for impairment at the reporting
unit level, which in some cases is different than the operating
segment level where the goodwill is reported under
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures
109
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
The reporting unit levels for the Companys goodwill and
its other intangible assets are the OTC, ICE Futures U.S, ICE
Futures Europe, ICE Futures Canada and market data reporting
units. Impairment testing at the reporting unit level is
performed utilizing a two-step methodology in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. The initial step requires the Company to
determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it
to the carrying value, including goodwill and other intangible
assets, of such reporting unit. If the fair value exceeds the
carrying value, no impairment loss is recognized and the second
step, which is a calculation of the impairment, is not
performed. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recorded equal
to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its
implied fair value.
The Companys indefinite-lived intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment annually in its fiscal fourth quarter
or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the asset may be impaired. Such evaluation includes
comparing the fair value of the asset with its carrying value.
If the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is
less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized
in an amount equal to the difference. This analysis did not
result in an impairment charge during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Intellectual
Property
All costs related to internally developed patents and trademarks
are expensed as incurred. All costs related to purchased
patents, trademarks and Internet domain names are recorded as
other intangible assets and are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. All costs related to
licensed patents are capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the license.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible
Assets
The Company reviews its property and equipment and finite-lived
intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully
recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects
undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining life of
such assets. If these projected cash flows are less than the
carrying amount, an impairment would be recognized, resulting in
a write-down of assets with a corresponding charge to earnings.
The impairment loss is measured based upon the difference
between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets.
Finite-lived intangible assets are generally amortized on a
straight-line basis or using an accelerated method over the
lesser of their contractual or estimated useful lives.
Income
Taxes
The Company and its U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated
U.S. federal income tax return. State income tax returns
are filed on a separate, combined or consolidated basis in
accordance with relevant state laws and regulations. The
majority of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are based in
the U.K. and they file separate local country income tax returns
and take advantage of the U.K.s group relief provisions
when applicable. Deferred tax expenses and benefits are
recognized for changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The difference between the statutory income tax rate and our
effective tax rate for a given period is primarily a reflection
of the tax effects of our foreign operations, general business
and tax credits, tax-exempt income, state income taxes and the
non-deductibility of certain expenses.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys revenues primarily consist of transaction fee
revenues for OTC and futures transactions executed over the
Platform or through the open-outcry exchange and are recognized
on the date the transactions occur. The Company calculates the
transaction fee revenues based on the volume of each
110
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
commodity traded multiplied by the transaction rate for each
commodity type. The futures transaction fee revenues are
determined on the basis of the transaction fee charged for each
contract traded on the exchange. Cleared transaction fees are
currently remitted by LCH.Clearnet to ICE Futures Europe on a
monthly basis. LCH.Clearnet, which is a clearing house based in
London, also collects fees for cleared OTC contracts traded on
the Platform.
Transaction fees are recorded net of rebates of
$37.3 million, $7.4 million and $543,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
Company offers rebates in certain of its markets primarily to
help generate market liquidity and trading volumes by providing
customers trading in those markets a full or partial discount to
the applicable commission rate. Typically, the Company offers
these rebates until it believes the market has generated
sufficient liquidity and volume so that the rebates are no
longer needed to sustain and promote liquidity. These rebates
reduce revenue that the Company would have generated had it
charged full transaction fees and had it generated the same
volume without the rebate program.
Market data fee revenues primarily include terminal and license
fees received from data vendors in exchange for the provision of
real-time futures price information and data access fees. Market
data fees are charged to data vendors on a monthly basis based
on the number and type of terminals they have carrying futures
data. Each data vendor also pays an annual license fee, which is
deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the period of
the annual license. Market data fee revenues also include
monthly data access fees charged to customers that are signed up
to trade on the OTC Platform. The monthly data access amount for
each company is based on the number of users at each company
signed up to trade on the Platform. The difference between the
monthly data access fee total for each company and the actual
amount of commissions paid that month for trading activity is
recognized as monthly data access revenues. The actual amount of
commissions paid that month for trading activity is recognized
as transaction fee revenues.
Other revenues are recognized as services are provided or they
are deferred and amortized ratably over the periods to which
they relate.
Sources
of Supplies
The Company uses 13 primary vendors for equipment used in the
Platform and its network. If these vendors were unable to meet
the Companys needs, management believes that the Company
could obtain this equipment from other vendors on comparable
terms and that its operating results would not be materially
adversely affected.
Credit
Risk and Significant Customers
The Companys accounts receivable related to its OTC
business segment and its market data business segment subjects
the Company to credit risk, as the Company does not require its
customers to post collateral for bilateral trades or for market
data services. The Company does not risk its own capital in
transactions or extend credit to market participants in any
commodities markets. The Company limits its risk of loss by
allowing trading access to the Platform to companies that
qualify as eligible commercial entities, as defined in the CEA,
and by terminating access to the Platform by entities with
delinquent accounts.
The launch and growth of cleared OTC products also limits the
Companys risk of loss in its OTC business as the
LCH.Clearnet collects cleared transaction fees on the date the
transactions occur and transfers these fees to the Company on a
monthly basis. The LCH.Clearnet serves as the central
counterparty to all trades executed by its members. During the
year ended December 31, 2007, 81.4% of the OTC business
segment commission fee revenues were from cleared trades. The
futures businesses have minimal credit risk as all of their
transaction revenues are cleared through the LCH.Clearnet, ICE
Clear U.S. or ICE Clear Canada.
111
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
There were no accounts receivable balances greater than 10% of
total consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31,
2007 or December 31, 2006. No single customer accounted for
more than 10% of total consolidated revenues during any of the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company currently sponsors employee stock option and
restricted stock plans. On January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) requires
the measurement and recognition of compensation expenses for all
share-based payment awards made to employees and directors
including employee stock options and restricted stock based on
estimated fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes the
Companys previous accounting under Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, for periods beginning in fiscal
2006.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified
prospective method. Under the modified prospective method,
compensation costs are recognized beginning on the adoption date
based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all
share-based payments granted after the effective date and based
on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards
granted to employees prior to the effective date of
SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective
date. The Companys consolidated financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 reflect the
impact of SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the
modified prospective transition method, the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have not
been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of
SFAS No. 123(R).
SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the
fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that
is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as stock-based
compensation expenses over the requisite service period in the
Companys consolidated financial statements. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for
stock-based awards to employees and directors using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion
No. 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123. Under the
intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expenses
have been recognized in the Companys consolidated
statements of income for stock options because the exercise
price of the Companys stock options granted to employees
and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying
stock at the date of grant.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), a Company is required to
calculate its historical additional paid-in capital pool
(APIC Pool). Prior to January 1, 2006, the
Company had not deducted in its tax returns any compensation
related to the share-based awards. Accordingly, the Company has
no tax benefits available to credit toward its historical APIC
Pool calculation. As of January 1, 2006, the APIC Pool of
the Company was zero. During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, excess tax benefits of $61.1 million and
$43.3 million, respectively, were recognized as an increase
to the additional paid-in capital balance. Of that amount,
$60.8 million and $41.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were qualifying
excess tax benefits that increased the APIC Pool eligible to
absorb future write-offs, if any, of unrealized deferred tax
assets related to stock options. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R), the $60.8 million and
$41.0 million is reported as a financing cash flow in the
accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Regarding the ordering of tax benefits to determine whether an
excess tax benefit was realized, as well as to measure that
excess tax benefit, the Company follows applicable tax laws and
ignores indirect effects of the excess tax benefit.
No unearned compensation is included in stockholders
equity under SFAS No. 123(R) for stock options and
restricted stock awards granted. Rather, such stock options and
restricted stock awards and units are included in
stockholders equity under SFAS No. 123(R) when
services required from employees and directors
112
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
in exchange for the awards are rendered and expensed. Upon the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006,
the Company reversed the December 31, 2005 deferred stock
compensation balance of $6.9 million by a charge to
additional paid-in capital.
Employee and director stock-based compensation expenses and the
related income tax benefit recognized for both stock options and
restricted stock in the accompanying consolidated statement of
income for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
$23.6 million and $7.4 million, respectively, and was
$8.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The amount expensed for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is net of
$1.8 million and $664,000, respectively, of stock-based
compensation that was capitalized as software development costs.
Employee and director stock-based compensation expenses and the
related income tax benefit recognized on the restricted stock in
the accompanying consolidated statement of income was
$1.7 million and $631,000 respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No 123(R), the Company had
adopted the disclosure-only provisions under
SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transaction and Disclosure. Had the Company elected to adopt
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123
for its stock options granted prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), pro forma net loss available to
common shareholders and loss per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2005 would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders, as reported
|
|
$
|
(20,909
|
)
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
loss, net of tax
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under
the fair value method for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(7,218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholders, pro forma
|
|
$
|
(26,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company will continue to use the Black-Scholes option
pricing model for purposes of valuing stock option awards. The
Companys determination of fair value of stock option
awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model is affected by the Companys stock price as
well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and
subjective variables. These variables include, but are not
limited to, the Companys expected share price volatility
over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee
stock option exercise behavior. Option-pricing models were
developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that
have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because the Companys employee stock options
have certain characteristics that are significantly different
from traded options, and because changes in the subjective
assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in
managements opinion, the existing valuation models may not
provide an accurate measure of the fair value of the
Companys employee stock options. Although the fair value
of employee stock options is determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R) using an option pricing model, that
value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a
willing buyer/willing seller market transaction, if one was to
exist.
113
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Earnings
Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted
average common shares outstanding during the year. Common
equivalent shares from stock options and restricted stock
awards, using the treasury stock method, are also included in
the diluted per share calculations unless their effect of
inclusion would be antidilutive (Note 22).
Treasury
Stock
The Company records treasury stock activities under the cost
method whereby the cost of the acquired stock is recorded as
treasury stock (Note 11).
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure about the Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requires the disclosure of the fair
value of financial instruments, including assets and liabilities
recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The
Companys financial instruments include cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, customer
accounts receivable, margin deposits and guaranty funds, cost
method investments, short-term and long-term debt and other
short-term assets and liabilities. Based on the short-term
nature of these financial instruments or their market rates, the
estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments approximate their carrying values as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
We carry our cost method investments at cost, or if a decline in
the value of the investment is deemed to be other than
temporary, at fair value. Estimates of fair value are generally
based on discounted cash flow analysis.
Foreign
Currency Translation Adjustments and Foreign Currency
Transaction Gains and Losses
In accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation, the functional currency of the Companys
U.K. subsidiaries had historically been U.K. pounds sterling.
The Company translated the assets and liabilities of its U.K.
subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange
rates and the revenues and expenses of these entities were
translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting
period. Translation adjustments were recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income, a separate component of
shareholders equity in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive income.
Effective July 1, 2006, the functional currency of the
majority of the Companys U.K. subsidiaries, including ICE
Futures Europe, became the U.S. dollar.
SFAS No. 52 states that the functional currency
of an entity is the currency of the primary economic environment
in which the entity operates. Normally, it is the currency of
the environment in which an entity primarily generates and
expends cash. Once the functional currency of a foreign entity
is determined, that determination should be used consistently
unless significant changes in economic facts and circumstances
indicate clearly that the functional currency has changed. A
change in functional currency should be accounted for
prospectively, and previously issued financial statements should
not be restated for a change in functional currency. In
addition, if the functional currency changes from a foreign
currency to the reporting currency, as is the case with the
Company, translation adjustments for prior periods should not be
removed from equity and the translated amounts for non-monetary
assets at the end of the prior period become the accounting
basis for those assets in the period of the change and
subsequent periods. The functional currency changed based on
various economic factors and circumstances, including the fact
that during the second quarter of 2006, ICE Futures Europe began
to charge and collect exchange fees in U.S. dollars rather
than pounds sterling in its key futures contracts, including
crude oil and heating oil contracts. The Company no longer
recognizes any translation adjustments in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements subsequent to June 30,
2006 for those U.K. subsidiaries that have switched their
functional currency to the U.S. dollar.
114
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In connection with the Companys acquisition of ICE Futures
Canada in August 2007 (Note 3), the Company now has foreign
currency translation risk equal to its net investment in certain
Canadian subsidiaries. The revenues, expenses and financial
results of these Canadian subsidiaries are denominated in
Canadian dollars, which is the functional currency of these
subsidiaries. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars using current rate of
exchange, with gains or losses included in the cumulative
translation adjustment account, a component of
shareholders equity.
The Company has foreign currency transaction gains and losses
related to the settlement of foreign currency denominated
assets, liabilities and payables that occur through its foreign
operations which are received in or paid in pounds sterling due
to the increase or decrease in the period-end foreign currency
exchange rates between periods. Gains and losses from foreign
currency transactions are included in other income (expense) in
the accompanying consolidated statements of income and resulted
in net gains (losses) of $842,000, ($288,000) and
$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Marketing
and Promotional Fees
Advertising costs, including print advertising and production
costs, product promotion campaigns and seminar, conference and
convention costs related to trade shows and other industry
events, are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred
advertising costs of $4.1 million, $1.8 million and
$1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes- an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition of tax
benefits, classification on the balance sheet, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007. As a result of the adoption, the Company
recognized a charge of $83,000 in its January 1, 2007
retained earnings balance.
In September 2006, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands fair value measurement disclosures.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company beginning in
fiscal year 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of the pending adoption of SFAS No. 157 on its
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected are reported in earnings.
SFAS No. 159 will be effective for the Company
beginning in fiscal year 2008. The Company does not expect that
it will elect the fair value option under
SFAS No. 159, and does not expect
SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Company completed its acquisition of ICE Futures
U.S. on January 12, 2007 (the Acquisition
Date). In the acquisition, each outstanding ICE Futures
U.S. membership interest was converted into, at the
election of each ICE Futures U.S. member, either
(i) cash equal to $1,074,719, (ii) 17,025 shares
of the Companys common stock or (iii) a combination
of cash consideration and stock consideration, in each case
subject to proration in accordance with the merger agreement
(the merger consideration). In addition, each
115
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
outstanding ICE Futures U.S. membership interest was
converted into the right to receive a pro rata share of any
bonus pool amounts not paid to ICE Futures
U.S. officers and governors and a pro rata share of ICE
Futures U.S.s excess working capital as of the Acquisition
Date. The Company determined that ICE Futures U.S.s excess
working capital as of the Acquisition Date was $2.1 million
and this amount was paid in cash to the ICE Futures
U.S. members that received the merger consideration. Under
terms of the merger agreement, the maximum amount of cash
payable by the Company as merger consideration, excluding the
excess working capital and including any cash payable in respect
of the bonus pool, was $400 million. In accordance with the
merger agreement, the Company paid the remainder of the merger
consideration, excluding the excess working capital and the cash
portion of the bonus pool, in shares of the Companys
common stock.
The acquisition provided the Company with the potential for
clearing, revenue and expense synergies, as well as the
opportunity to expand the Companys electronic trading
platform into soft commodities and financial products offered by
ICE Futures U.S. The acquisition has been accounted for as
a purchase business combination. Assets acquired and liabilities
assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of
January 12, 2007. The total purchase price was
$1.1 billion, and was comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to ICE Futures U.S. members
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Fair value of the Companys common stock issued
|
|
|
706,663
|
|
Excess working capital
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,123,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued
10.3 million shares of its common stock to ICE Futures
U.S. members. The fair value of the Companys common
stock was determined for accounting purposes to be $68.63 per
share, which represented the average closing price of the
Companys common stock for the five business day period
commencing two business days prior to the public announcement of
the acquisition on September 14, 2006. Acquisition-related
transaction costs include investment banking, legal and
accounting fees, valuation, printing and other external costs
directly related to the acquisition.
Purchase
Price Allocation for ICE Futures U.S. Acquisition
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was
allocated to ICE Futures U.S.s net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets based on the estimated fair
values of these assets as of January 12, 2007, as set forth
below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible
and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The
purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
39,945
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
784,385
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14,993
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
16,149
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
890,466
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
327,500
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
24,587
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(37,985
|
)
|
Accrued restructuring costs
|
|
|
(14,366
|
)
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
(784,385
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(113,930
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(11,741
|
)
|
Unearned government grant
|
|
|
(12,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
1,123,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The accounts payable and accrued liabilities amount above
includes $17.4 million related to investment banking
services performed for ICE Futures U.S. in connection with
the acquisition, which was paid subsequent to the Acquisition
Date. This amount has been included as a component of cash paid
for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, in the accompanying
consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The entire goodwill amount above will be
included in the OTC business segment for purposes of segment
reporting under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, because
this is consistent with how it is reported internally to the
Companys chief operating decision maker. Of the ICE
Futures U.S. goodwill balance above, $443.5 million
was allocated to the OTC reporting unit, $266.1 million was
allocated to the ICE Futures Europe reporting unit,
$19.7 million was allocated to the market data reporting
unit and the remaining $161.2 million was allocated to the
ICE Futures U.S. reporting unit for purposes of impairment
testing as required by SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. The goodwill from the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition was allocated based on the portion of the
synergy, costs savings and other expected future cash flows
expected to benefit the reporting units at the time of the
acquisition.
Identifiable
Intangible Assets for ICE Futures U.S. Acquisition
In performing the purchase price allocation, the Company
considered, among other factors, the intended future use of
acquired assets, analyses of historical financial performance
and estimates of future performance of ICE Futures U.S.s
business. The estimate of the fair value of intangible assets is
based, in part, on a valuation using an income approach, market
approach or a cost approach, as appropriate. The rates utilized
to discount net cash flows to their present values were based on
the Companys weighted average cost of equity and ranged
from 13.0% to 14.8%. These discount rates were determined after
consideration of the Companys rate of return on debt and
equity and the weighted average return on invested capital. The
following table sets forth the components of intangible assets
associated with the acquisition as of December 31, 2007 (in
thousands, except years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Agriculture and soft commodity trading products
|
|
$
|
195,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,200
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
Financial trading products
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
14,011
|
|
|
20 years
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
29,700
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
27,843
|
|
|
17-20 years
|
Technology
|
|
|
7,900
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
3 years
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
2-5 years
|
DCM/DCO designation
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
327,500
|
|
|
$
|
8,192
|
|
|
$
|
319,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The agriculture and soft commodity trading products identifiable
intangible asset relates to the core trading product rights and
privileges relating to the agriculture and soft commodity
trading products. An indefinite life was used for the
agriculture and soft commodity trading products as these
products have traded for many years at ICE Futures U.S., ICE
Futures U.S. is allowed to trade these products without
requiring a license from any third party and authorizations by
the CFTC to trade these products are perpetual. The financial
trading products have been assigned a 20 year useful life
as they do not have a long trading history, are not unique to
ICE Futures U.S. and in some cases are dependent on
licenses with third parties. Customer relationships represent
the underlying relationships with ICE Futures U.S.s
existing customers. Technology represents both internally and
externally developed software related to clearing operations,
back office, eCOPS, floor operations and general operations.
Non-compete agreements represent the estimated fair value of
agreements with ICE Futures U.S.s former management team.
DCM/DCO designation represents Designated Contract Market
(DCM) and Derivatives Clearing Organization
(DCO) designations available from the
117
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
CFTC under the CEA when certain standards are met. The customer
relationships intangible asset and the financial trading
products intangible asset are being amortized using an
accelerated method and the other finite-lived intangible assets
are being amortized using the straight-line method.
Accrued
Restructuring Costs for ICE Futures U.S.
Acquisition
As a part of the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S., the Company
formed a plan to restructure the ICE Futures
U.S. duplicative employee functions to align them with the
Companys existing business functions and to streamline ICE
Futures U.S.s operations. Consequently, the Company
included an accrual for severance benefit costs of
$14.4 million in the purchase price allocation to account
for the planned reduction in workforce. The original amount of
the liability was $11.0 million and it was increased to
$14.4 million as of December 31, 2007. The Company has
completed its assessment of which employees of ICE Futures
U.S. would be involuntarily terminated and increased the
reserve by $3.3 million based on this finalized plan. This
amount and the related payments are documented in the following
table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, January 12, 2007
|
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
Increase in reserve
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
Cost applied against the reserve
|
|
|
(11,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
Forma Financial Information for ICE Futures U.S.
Acquisition
The financial information in the table below summarizes the
combined results of operations of the Company and ICE Futures
U.S., on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been
combined as of the beginning of the periods presented. The pro
forma financial information is presented for informational
purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations
that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place
at the beginning of the periods presented. Such pro forma
financial information is based on the historical financial
statements of the Company and ICE Futures U.S.
This pro forma financial information is based on estimates and
assumptions that have been made solely for purposes of
developing such pro forma information, including, without
limitation, purchase accounting adjustments. The pro forma
financial information presented below also includes depreciation
and amortization based on the valuation of ICE Futures
U.S.s tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets
resulting from the transaction and interest expense related to
the debt issued to complete the acquisition. The pro forma
financial information does not reflect any synergies or
operating cost reductions that may be achieved from the combined
operations. The pro forma financial information combines the
historical results for the Company and ICE Futures U.S. for
the year ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per
share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
409,568
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
139,817
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Other
Acquisitions
On February 28, 2007, the Company acquired all the assets
of Commoditrack, Inc. for a combination of cash and the
Companys common stock. The acquisition enables the Company
to provide its customers a real-time risk management program as
well as the ability to download trades and access profit and
loss detail on
118
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the Platform. The acquisition has been accounted for as a
purchase business combination. The financial results have been
included in the OTC business segment from the date of
acquisition.
On July 9, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of
ChemConnect Inc. for cash. ChemConnect is an electronic
marketplace for the trading of OTC natural gas liquids and
chemical products, including propane, ethane, ethylene,
propylene and benzene. On the closing date of the acquisition,
the Company transitioned the trading of these products to the
Companys Platform. The acquisition has been accounted for
as a purchase business combination. The financial results have
been included in the OTC business segment from the date of
acquisition.
On August 27, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of ICE
Futures Canada and its clearing house, ICE Clear Canada, Inc.
(formerly known as the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, Inc. and the
WCE Clearing Corporation, respectively), for cash. ICE Futures
Canada is the leading agricultural futures exchange in Canada
and it offers futures and options contracts on canola, domestic
feed wheat and western barley. In connection with the
acquisition, the Company transitioned the trading of the ICE
Futures Canada products to the Companys Platform in
December 2007. The acquisition has been accounted for as a
purchase business combination. The financial results have been
included in the futures business segment from the date of
acquisition.
On October 1, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of
Chatham Energy Partners, LLC (Chatham) for cash.
Chatham is a leading OTC brokerage firm that specializes in
structuring and facilitating transactions in the natural gas
markets for energy options. Chatham supports the execution of
the Companys strategic plans to develop the leading
electronic marketplace for the execution of OTC energy options.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The financial results of Chatham have been included
in the OTC business segment from the date of acquisition.
The aggregate cost of these other acquisitions was
$90.5 million, which was paid in cash. Under purchase
accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on preliminary
estimated fair values of these assets. The purchase price
allocations for these other acquisitions are preliminary and are
subject to change during the allocation period. The primary area
of purchase price allocation that is not yet finalized relates
to identified intangible assets.
The Company will make additional payments in cash or stock
contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue targets by
certain of the acquisition companies or contingent upon the
acquisition companies meeting certain other criteria. The
maximum annual contingent payments to be made are
$14.0 million, $16.2 million and $19.2 million in
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
As a Recognized Investment Exchange, the FSA requires ICE
Futures Europe to restrict the use of the equivalent of six
months of operating expenditures in cash or cash equivalents at
all times. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, this amount
was equal to $13.1 million and $12.4 million,
respectively, and is reflected as restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company owns 100% of ICE Markets Limited. ICE Markets
Limited, which is based in London, supports trading of European
energy commodities, performs helpdesk functions and is
authorized by the FSA to act as an arranger of deals in
investments. The FSA requires ICE Markets Limited to maintain a
minimum level of financial resources, which is calculated
annually on the basis of 25% of the relevant annual
expenditures, adjusted for any illiquid assets. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the resource requirement was
equal to $2.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively,
and is reflected as restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
119
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In August 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with a
third party to sell its former open-outcry disaster recovery
site in London. Prior to the closure of the Companys
open-outcry floor in London during April 2005, the building on
this site was used as a backup open-outcry trading facility. In
August 2006, in connection with the sale, the Company received a
non-refundable deposit of $1.3 million. The deposit was
recorded as deferred revenue and restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2006. As of December 31, 2006, the net book value of the
land, which was included in the futures business segment, was
$3.7 million and was classified as an asset held for sale.
The sale was completed in February 2007 at which time final
payment was received and a net gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million was recognized as other income in the
accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
5.
|
Short-Term
and Long-Term Investments
|
Short-term and long-term investments consist of
available-for-sale securities. The cost of securities sold is
based on the specific identification method. As of
December 31, 2007, available-for-sale securities consisted
of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Government securities
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
28,757
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28,817
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
111,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
140,896
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, available-for-sale securities
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
$
|
77,356
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
77,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of these investments as of
December 31, 2007, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year
|
|
$
|
17,252
|
|
Due within 1 year to 5 years
|
|
|
12,809
|
|
Due within 5 years to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 10 years
|
|
|
110,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had
$141.0 million and $77.4 million, respectively, in
short-term investments. Investments that the Company intends to
hold for less than one year are classified as short-term
investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments, including
the restricted short-term investments, were $272.8 million,
$346.1 million and $58.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Purchases
of available-for-sale investments, including the restricted
short-term investments, were $332.4 million,
$309.2 million and $166.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and
120
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
2005, respectively. Net realized gains on the available-for-sale
investments, including the restricted short-term investments,
were $171,000, $882,000 and $770,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and have
been classified as interest and investment income in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income.
|
|
6.
|
Cost
Method Investments
|
In December 2006, the Company acquired an 8% equity stake in the
National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange, Ltd
(NCDEX), a derivatives exchange located in Mumbai,
India, for $36.3 million. The Company may be required to
sell 3% of its 8% NCDEX stake as a result of recent Indian
regulatory limitations on foreign investments in Indian
Exchanges. The Company currently believes there will be
sufficient demand for its shares such that it will at least
recover its carrying value if it is required to sell the 3%
stake. In addition, the Company has a 1.1% equity share
investment in LCH.Clearnet, a third party clearing house that
currently clears the Companys OTC and energy futures
contracts. The Company uses the cost method to account for these
investments as the Company does not control and does not have
the ability to exercise significant influence over the
investment companies operating and financial policies.
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Computer and network equipment
|
|
$
|
46,393
|
|
|
$
|
25,786
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Software and internally developed software
|
|
|
70,336
|
|
|
|
52,629
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
11,707
|
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,928
|
|
|
|
85,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(79,404
|
)
|
|
|
(59,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
63,524
|
|
|
$
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
amortization of software and internally developed software was
$8.1 million, $6.1 million and $7.1 million,
respectively, and depreciation of all other property and
equipment was $15.1 million, $4.7 million and
$4.7 million, respectively. The unamortized software and
internally developed software balances were $21.5 million
and $12.4 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill consisted of the following as of December 31, 2007
and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
73,967
|
|
Other activity
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
79,575
|
|
Acquisition of ICE Futures U.S.
|
|
|
890,466
|
|
Other acquisitions
|
|
|
37,801
|
|
Other activity
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,009,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company completed the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition
during the year ended December 31, 2007, which resulted in
goodwill of $890.5 million (Note 3). The Company also
completed the acquisitions of Commoditrack, ChemConnect, ICE
Futures Canada and Chatham during the year ended
December 31, 2007 (Note 3), which resulted in
additional goodwill of $37.8 million. The total amount of
goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes is
$10.1 million. The other activity in the goodwill balance
relates to foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company
did not recognize any amortization expense or impairment losses
on goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005.
Other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization
consisted of the following as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
62,709
|
|
|
$
|
5,769
|
|
|
|
4 to 20
|
|
Russell licensing rights
|
|
|
149,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Trading products with finite lives
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
15,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 to 5
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
9,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,455
|
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(15,754
|
)
|
|
|
(6,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets, net
|
|
|
236,701
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading products with indefinite-lives
|
|
|
216,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCM/DCO designation for ICE Futures U.S.
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15,863
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
301,021
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
537,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See note 3 for a discussion of the $327.5 million in
other intangible assets relating to the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition and Note 16 for a discussion of the
$149.8 million in Russell licensing rights. The remaining
$68.4 million in other intangibles assets increase during
the year ended December 31, 2007 relate to the other
acquisitions completed in 2007.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
amortization of other intangible assets was $9.5 million,
$648,000 and $1.3 million, respectively. Collectively, the
remaining weighted average useful lives of the finite-lived
intangible assets is 9.6 years. The Company expects future
amortization expense from other intangible assets as of
December 31, 2007 to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
25,734
|
|
2009
|
|
|
36,123
|
|
2010
|
|
|
32,294
|
|
2011
|
|
|
31,858
|
|
2012
|
|
|
30,461
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
80,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
236,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company financed the cash portion of the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings under a
senior unsecured credit facility (the Credit
Agreement) dated January 12, 2007, as amended on
August 24, 2007, that the Company entered into with
Wachovia Bank, National Association (Wachovia), as
Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication
Agent, and the lenders named therein. In connection with the
Credit Agreement, the Company terminated its previous
$50.0 million credit facility with Wachovia, under which no
borrowings were outstanding. The Credit Agreement provides for a
term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$250.0 million and a revolving credit facility in the
aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million (collectively,
the Credit Facilities). In connection with the
acquisition, the Company used the proceeds of the
$250.0 million term loan along with $166.8 million of
cash on hand to finance the $416.8 million cash component
of the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow an aggregate principal
amount of up to $250.0 million under the revolving credit
facility at any time from the closing date of the Credit
Agreement through the third anniversary of the closing date of
the merger with ICE Futures U.S., which is January 12,
2010. The Company has agreed to reserve $50.0 million of
the $250.0 million available under the revolving credit
facility for use by ICE Clear U.S., ICE Futures U.S.s
clearing organization, to provide liquidity in the event of
default by a clearing participant. The remaining amount under
the revolving credit facility can be used by the Company for
general corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at the option of the
Company, bear interest on the principal amount outstanding at
either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or
(ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin
rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of
(i) Wachovias prime rate or (ii) the federal
funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from
0.50% to 1.125% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for
the base rate loans based on the Companys total leverage
ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month period. Interest on
each loan is payable quarterly. As December 31, 2007, the
Company has a $221.9 million three-month LIBOR loan
outstanding with a stated interest rate of 5.46%, including the
applicable margin rate at December 31, 2007 of 0.625% on
the LIBOR loan. For the borrowings under the term loan facility,
the Company began making payments on June 30, 2007, and
will make payments quarterly thereafter until the fifth
anniversary of the closing date of the merger with ICE Futures
U.S., which will be January 12, 2012. Aggregate principal
maturities on this note over each of the next five years are
$37.5 million, $46.9 million, $50.0 million,
$68.8 million and $18.7 million in 2008, 2009, 2010,
2011 and 2012, respectively. The Credit Agreement includes an
unutilized revolving credit commitment fee that is equal to the
unused maximum revolver amount multiplied by an applicable
margin rate and is payable in arrears on a quarterly basis. The
applicable margin rate ranges from 0.10% to 0.20% based on the
Companys total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing
twelve month period. Based on this calculation, the applicable
margin rate was 0.125% at December 31, 2007.
The Credit Agreement requires the Company to use 100% of the net
cash proceeds raised from debt issuances or asset dispositions,
with certain limited exceptions, to prepay outstanding loans
under the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, the
Company may prepay the outstanding loans under the Credit
Facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty upon
written notice to the Administrative Agent. The Credit Agreement
contains affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not
limited to, leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as
limitations or required approvals for acquisitions, dispositions
of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of additional
debt or the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to
the Companys business. The Company has been and is
currently in compliance with all applicable covenants under the
Credit Agreement.
ICE Clear Canada has arranged a total of $3.0 million in a
revolving standby credit facility with the Royal Bank of Canada
to provide liquidity in the event of default by a clearing
member. Borrowings under the revolving standby credit facility,
which are required to be collateralized, bear interest based on
the prime rate
123
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
plus 0.75%. There are no borrowings outstanding under this
facility, and ICE Clear Canada is currently in compliance with
all applicable covenants.
On November 17, 2004, the Company entered into a
$25.0 million revolving credit agreement (the
Facility) with Wachovia. The Facility was amended on
October 18, 2005 to increase the amount up to
$50.0 million. Under the terms of the Facility, the Company
could borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to the maximum
available under the Facility at any time from the closing date
of the Facility through the termination date of the Facility.
The Facility was scheduled to terminate on November 17,
2007. The Company borrowed $25.0 million under the Facility
on November 23, 2004. These funds were used for a portion
of the $67.5 million redemption of the Companys
Class B redeemable common stock that occurred in
November 2004 (Note 11). The Company repaid
$12.0 million in January 2005 with excess cash and the
remaining $13.0 million in November 2005, using a portion
of the proceeds from the Companys November 2005 initial
public offering of common stock. In connection with the closing
of the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S., on January 12,
2007, the Company terminated the $50.0 million Facility,
under which no borrowings were outstanding.
Continental Power Exchange, Inc. is the Companys
predecessor company and was owned by the chief executive officer
of the Company. The Company had a put agreement (the
Redeemable Stock Put) with Continental Power
Exchange, Inc. under which, in certain circumstances,
Continental Power Exchange, Inc. had the right to require the
Company to purchase a portion of the Companys common stock
held by Continental Power Exchange, Inc. for an amount equal to
the greater of fair market value at the date the put was
exercised, or $5.0 million. Continental Power Exchange,
Inc. had the right to exercise the put option upon the
termination, retirement, death or disability of the chief
executive officer, exercisable at any time within six months of
such an event.
The Company initially recorded the Redeemable Stock Put at the
minimum $5.0 million redemption threshold and had adjusted
the Redeemable Stock Put to its redemption amount at each
subsequent balance sheet date. The adjustment to the redemption
amount had been recorded directly to retained earnings or, in
the absence of positive retained earnings, by charges against
additional paid-in capital.
In October 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with
Continental Power Exchange, Inc. (the Put Termination
Agreement) to cancel the Redeemable Stock Put contingent
upon the closing of the Companys initial public offering
of common stock. The Company increased the Redeemable Stock Put
by $61.3 million during the year ended December 31,
2005 resulting from an increase in the estimated fair value of
the Companys common stock from $8.00 per share as of
December 31, 2004 to $35.90 per share as of
November 21, 2005, the closing date of the Companys
initial public offering of common stock and the termination date
of the Redeemable Stock Put. The balance of the Redeemable Stock
Put on November 21, 2005 was $78.9 million and was
reclassifed to additional paid-in capital upon its termination.
As part of the Put Termination Agreement, the Company amended
Continental Power Exchange, Inc.s registration rights with
respect to its shares of the Companys common stock. In
addition to extending customary demand and piggy-back
registration rights for a twelve-month period from a six-month
period following the termination of the senior officers
employment with the Company, the Company has agreed to pay all
underwriting discounts, brokers fees and selling
commissions incurred by Continental Power Exchange, Inc. in
connection with selling its shares pursuant to the registration
rights granted under the agreement. In no event will the
aggregate amount payable by the Company for these underwriting
fees exceed $4.5 million. The Company has not accrued for
these fees because the payment of any amount is not currently
probable.
124
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Common
Stock
On March 21, 2005, the board of directors approved a plan
of recapitalization that amended and restated the Companys
Certificate of Incorporation effective immediately prior to the
closing of the November 2005 initial public offering of the
Companys common stock. The plan of recapitalization and
the amendment and restatement of the Companys Certificate
of Incorporation were approved by the Companys
shareholders. The plan of recapitalization: (i) authorized
a reverse stock split of the Companys outstanding common
stock at a ratio of 1 for 4; (ii) authorized the creation
of a new class of common stock and a new class of preferred
stock; and (iii) authorized the Companys board of
directors to grant holders of its Class A, Series 1
and Class A, Series 2 common shares the right to
convert these shares into shares of new common stock on a
1-for-1
basis at the holders option, subject to such conditions as
the Companys board of directors may deem appropriate. As
of December 31, 2006, all Class A, Series 1 and
Class A, Series 2 common shares have been converted
into the new class of common stock.
Stock
Option Plans
The Company has adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2000
Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Stock Option Plan). As
of December 31, 2007, there are 5,250,000 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000 Stock Option
Plan, of which 186,608 shares are available for future
issuance as of December 31, 2007. The Company has also
adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan). The 2005
Equity Incentive Plan allows the Company to grant incentive
stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units. As of
December 31, 2007, there are 2,125,000 shares reserved
for issuance under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, of which
1,321,460 shares are available for future issuance as of
December 31, 2007.
Stock options are granted at the discretion of the compensation
committee of the board of directors. The Company may grant,
under provisions of the plans, both incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options. The options generally vest from
three to four years, but can vest at different intervals based
on the compensation committees determination. Generally,
options may be exercised up to ten years after the date of
grant, but generally expire 14 days after termination of
employment. The following is a summary of options for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
4,874,073
|
|
|
$
|
8.48
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
509,950
|
|
|
|
18.01
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(145,340
|
)
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(451,265
|
)
|
|
|
9.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,787,418
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,654
|
|
|
|
100.38
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,510,481
|
)
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(142,683
|
)
|
|
|
8.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,304,908
|
|
|
|
17.05
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
108,126
|
|
|
|
180.63
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,043,734
|
)
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(10,213
|
)
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,359,087
|
|
|
|
35.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Details of stock options outstanding as of December 31,
2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Vested or expected to vest
|
|
|
1,311,920
|
|
|
$
|
32.57
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
|
$
|
209,821
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
936,690
|
|
|
$
|
15.59
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
|
|
$
|
165,707
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
$143.6 million, $157.7 million and $1.1 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, there were
$15.3 million in total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years as
the stock options vest. During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, the total fair value of options vested was
$119.4 million and $60.3 million.
Details of options outstanding as of December 31, 2007 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Options
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
$ 4.20 - 7.04
|
|
|
22,953
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
22,953
|
|
8.00 - 12.00
|
|
|
916,214
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
785,841
|
|
26.00 - 35.08
|
|
|
144,140
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
73,078
|
|
81.25 - 104.23
|
|
|
167,654
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
54,818
|
|
115.72 - 138.80
|
|
|
11,049
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
156.78 - 160.58
|
|
|
7,992
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
170.25 - 189.43
|
|
|
89,085
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,359,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2007, 936,690
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.59.
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2006, 1,346,834
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $9.17.
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2005, 2,425,705
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $8.77.
All stock options are granted at an exercise price equal to the
fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. The grant
date fair value is based on the closing stock price on the date
of grant. Prior to the Companys initial public offering of
common stock in November 2005, this determination was made by
the Companys compensation committee, primarily based on
annual valuations performed by an independent third party. The
fair value of the stock options on the date of the grant is
recognized as expense ratably over the vesting period, net of
estimated forfeitures.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for
purposes of valuing stock option awards, both under
SFAS 123(R) for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 and for pro forma purposes under SFAS No. 123 for
the year ended December 31, 2005. Pro forma information
regarding net income and earnings per share, as presented in
Note 2 for the year ended December 31, 2005 is
required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by
SFAS No. 148, and has been determined as if the
Company has accounted for its employee stock options under the
fair value method of SFAS No. 123 as of its effective
date. The Company has used the
126
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Black-Scholes option pricing model weighted-average assumptions
in the table below to compute the value of all options for
shares of common stock granted to employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Estimated weighted-average fair value of options granted per
share
|
|
$
|
92.58
|
|
|
$
|
53.06
|
|
|
$
|
7.36
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life
computation is derived from historical exercise patterns and
anticipated future patterns. Expected volatilities are based on
historical volatility of the Companys stock as well as
stock of certain of the Companys peers within its industry
group.
Restricted
Stock Plans
The Company granted a maximum of 398,013, 407,661 and 63,750
time- and performance-based restricted stock units under the
2005 Equity Incentive Plan during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, including
85,460, 141,111 and 63,750 time-based restricted stock units in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The grant date fair value of
each award is based on the closing stock price at the date of
grant. The fair value of the time-based restricted stock units
on the date of the grant is recognized as expense ratably over
the vesting period, net of forfeitures. Granted but unvested
shares would be forfeited upon termination of employment. When
restricted stock is forfeited, compensation costs previously
recognized for unvested shares are reversed. Until the shares
vest and are issued, the participants have no voting or dividend
rights and the shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred,
pledged or otherwise encumbered.
As of December 31, 2007, there are 1,475,000 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan (the
Restricted Plan). Under the Restricted Plan, the
compensation committee reserved a number of the Companys
common stock treasury shares sufficient to cover the current
obligations under the Restricted Plan for issuance to the
employees and board of directors of the Company. As of
December 31, 2007, 1,446,674 restricted shares under the
Restricted Plan were subject to outstanding awards of restricted
stock units made to senior officers of the Company and members
of the board of directors. Of these shares, 800,212 were granted
in 2004 as time-based restricted shares and vest based on a
four-year vesting schedule. As of December 31, 2007,
531,178 of the time-based restricted treasury shares under the
Restricted Plan have been issued.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, deferred stock
compensation of $2.5 million was recorded on the restricted
stock grants issued during the year based on the fair value of
the shares on the date of grant and was being amortized over
four years. The unamortized balance of deferred stock
compensation on the restricted stock was included as a separate
component of shareholders equity. The unamortized deferred
stock compensation balance was reversed by a charge to
additional paid-in capital upon adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recognizes
compensation costs, net of forfeitures, over the vesting period
for awards with performance conditions only if it is probable
that the condition will be satisfied. If the Company initially
determines that it is not probable that the performance
condition will be satisfied and later determines that it is
probable that the performance condition will be satisfied, or
vice versa, the effect of the change in estimate will be
accounted for in the period of change by recording a cumulative
catch-up
adjustment to retroactively apply the new estimate. The Company
would recognize the remaining compensation costs over the
remaining vesting period. The Companys compensation
committee, pursuant to the terms
127
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the authority delegated to
it by the Companys board of directors, can make equitable
adjustments to the performance condition in recognition of
unusual or non-recurring events.
Under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, 61,983 to 309,913
restricted shares have been reserved for potential issuance as
performance-based restricted shares for certain Company
employees. These restricted shares are also subject to a market
condition that may reduce the number of shares that are issued
if the 2008 Company total shareholder return falls below that of
the S&P 500 Index. The reduction in the number of shares
that could be issued if total shareholder return is below the
return of the S&P 500 Index will be either a 10% or 20%
reduction. These shares were granted in December 2007 and vest
over a three-year period based on the Companys financial
performance targets set by the Companys compensation
committee for the year ending December 31, 2008. The
potential compensation expenses to be recognized under these
performance-based restricted shares would be $10.0 million
if the Threshold Performance Target is met and
61,983 shares vest, $20.0 million if the Target
Performance Target is met and 123,965 shares vest,
$34.9 million if the Above Target Performance Target is met
and 216,939 shares vest, and $49.9 million if the
Maximum Performance Target is met and 309,913 shares vest.
Shares to be issued will be prorated on a straight-line basis
between performance level targets. Under
SFAS No. 123(R), the Company will recognize
compensation costs, net of forfeitures, using an accelerated
amortization method over the vesting period for awards with
performance conditions only if it is probable that the condition
will be satisfied. As of December 31, 2007, no compensation
costs have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements related to these shares.
In 2006, the Company granted a maximum of 269,190
performance-based restricted shares for certain Company
employees. These shares vest over a three-year period based on
the Companys financial performance targets set by the
Companys compensation committee for the year ending
December 31, 2007. The potential compensation expenses to
be recognized under these performance-based restricted shares
would be $4.8 million if the Threshold Performance Target
is met and 53,824 shares vest, $9.6 million if the
Target Performance Target is met and 107,683 shares vest,
$16.7 million if the Above Target Performance Target is met
and 188,420 shares vest, and $23.9 million if the
Maximum Performance Target is met and 269,190 shares vest.
Shares to be issued was prorated on a straight-line basis
between performance level targets. During the three months ended
March 31, 2007, the Company determined that it was probable
that the Target Performance Target would be met and the Company
recorded a cumulative
catch-up
adjustment of $787,000 in non-cash compensation expenses. During
the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company
determined that it was probable that a performance target level
between the Target Performance Target and the Above Target
Performance Target would be met and the Company recorded a
cumulative
catch-up
adjustment of $944,000 in non-cash compensation expenses. An
additional $6.5 million cumulative
catch-up
adjustment was recorded during the three months ended
December 31, 2007 to reflect actual 2007 performance. The
Company uses an accelerated attribution method to record
compensation costs related to this award. Total 2007 non-cash
compensation expenses related to this award were
$11.2 million. The remaining $7.1 million in non-cash
compensation expenses will be expensed over the remaining two
year vesting period.
In September 2004, the Company granted 625,212 performance-based
restricted shares for the Companys senior officers under
the Restricted Plan. These shares vest based on Company
financial performance relative to three-year cumulative
performance targets set by the Companys Compensation
Committee for the period from January 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2007. The potential compensation expenses to
be recognized under the performance-based restricted shares
would be $1.4 million if the Minimum Performance Target is
met and 208,404 restricted shares vest, $2.8 million if the
Target Performance Target is met and 416,807 restricted shares
vest or $4.2 million if the Maximum Performance Target is
met and 625,212 restricted shares vest. During the three months
ended March 31, 2006, the Company determined that it was
probable that the Target Performance Target would be met and the
Company recorded a cumulative
catch-up
adjustment to non-cash compensation expenses of
$1.2 million. During the three months ended June 30,
2006, the Company determined that it was probable that the
Maximum Performance Target would be met and the Company recorded
a cumulative
catch-up
adjustment to non-cash compensation expenses of $943,000. The
remaining $2.1 million in non-cash
128
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
compensation expenses under the Maximum Performance Target were
expensed ratably over the remaining requisite service period
from June 30, 2006 through December 31, 2007. The
Company met the Maximum Performance Target for the period from
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007 and the company
issued the 625,212 shares in January 2008 following the
completion of the performance period.
The Company has adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2003
Restricted Stock Deferral Plan for Outside Directors (the
Director Plan). Directors can elect to receive up to
100% of their board compensation in restricted stock or
restricted stock units. The restricted stock generally vests
over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2007, there
are 250,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance
under the Director Plan. Under the Director Plan, the
compensation committee reserved a number of the Companys
common stock treasury shares sufficient to cover the current
obligations under the Director Plan for issuance to the board of
directors in lieu of fees otherwise payable in cash. During the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, 947, 5,043
and 16,799 shares, respectively, of restricted stock and
restricted stock units were granted to members of the board of
directors under the Director Plan.
Restricted shares are used as an incentive to attract and retain
qualified senior officers and to increase shareholder returns
with actual performance-based awards based on enhanced
shareholder value. The restricted plans include a change in
control provision that may accelerate vesting on both the
time-based and performance-based restricted shares if employment
is terminated or if the individual resigns for good
reason within 12 months after the effective date of a
change in control. The following is a summary of the nonvested
restricted shares under all plans discussed above for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock Shares
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
1,430,183
|
|
|
$
|
7.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
101,799
|
|
|
|
27.86
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(260,508
|
)
|
|
|
(8.36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,271,474
|
|
|
|
9.01
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
349,521
|
|
|
|
89.29
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(213,391
|
)
|
|
|
(9.78
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(68,535
|
)
|
|
|
(8.31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,339,069
|
|
|
|
29.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
398,334
|
|
|
|
182.66
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(268,998
|
)
|
|
|
(21.91
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,276
|
)
|
|
|
(38.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,436,129
|
|
|
|
73.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock shares granted in the table above include both
time-based and performance-based grants. Performance based
shares awarded in prior years have been adjusted to reflect the
actual shares to be issued based on the achievement of past
performance targets. Unvested performance-based restricted
shares granted are presented in the table above at the maximum
number of restricted shares that would vest if the maximum
performance targets are met. As of December 31, 2007, there
were $23.5 million in total unrecognized compensation costs
related to the time-based restricted stock and the
performance-based restricted stock. These costs are expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years
as the restricted stock vests. During the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the total fair value of
restricted stock vested under all restricted stock plans was
$41.0 million and $14.5 million, respectively.
Treasury
Stock
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company received 180,601 and 68,654 shares, respectively,
of common stock from certain employees of the Company related to
tax withholdings made by the Company on the employees
behalf. The Company recorded the receipt of the shares as
treasury stock. The
129
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Company also issued 404,740 and 135,370 shares of treasury
stock during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, under the Director Plan and the Restricted Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Companys
compensation committee reserved 21,250 treasury shares for
potential issuance under the Restricted Plan. During the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Companys
compensation committee reserved 947, 5,043 and 16,799 treasury
shares, respectively, for potential issuance under the Director
Plan. Treasury stock activity is presented in the accompanying
consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
income before income taxes from domestic operations was
$192.3 million, $144.2 million and $27.3 million,
respectively, and income before income taxes from foreign
operations was $166.1 million, $68.3 million and
$32.7 million, respectively. Details of the income tax
provision in the accompanying consolidated statements of income
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
72,623
|
|
|
$
|
44,576
|
|
|
$
|
11,787
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
30,359
|
|
|
|
10,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,767
|
|
|
|
74,935
|
|
|
|
22,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
(2,370
|
)
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
(3,290
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,945
|
)
|
|
|
(5,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense
|
|
$
|
117,822
|
|
|
$
|
69,275
|
|
|
$
|
19,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial
statements and their respective tax bases which give rise to
deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2007
and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred and stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
7,478
|
|
|
$
|
3,189
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
8,446
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
NOL carryforward
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31,114
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
28,396
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(6,772
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(122,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax accrued on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,813
|
)
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(132,227
|
)
|
|
|
(4,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(103,831
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
Net current deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(108,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company has excess foreign tax
credits of $1.2 million for tax purposes which are expected
to offset prior tax liabilities. As of December 31, 2007,
the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
$13.0 million for state tax purposes, which will be
available to offset future taxable income. If not used, these
carryforwards will expire in 2026. The Company recognized a
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $2.7 million
as of December 31, 2007. The valuation allowance is due to
excess state tax credits that are available to offset future
taxes.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax
rate to the Companys effective income tax rate for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Jobs Act repatriation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2007
is lower than the federal statutory rate primarily due to a
decrease in the amount of U.S. taxes accrued on foreign
earnings, tax exempt interest income and tax credits, which are
partially offset by state taxes and non-deductible expenses.
131
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries that have not been remitted to the
U.S. totaled $209.5 million and $82.9 million as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006. These earnings are not
subject to U.S. income tax until they are distributed to
the U.S. Historically, the Company has provided for
deferred U.S. federal income taxes on these undistributed
earnings in the accompanying consolidated statements of income
as they were determined not to be indefinitely reinvested.
However, during the year ended December 31, 2006, the
Company determined in accordance with APB No. 23,
Accounting for Income Taxes-Special Areas, that
$51.0 million of the undistributed earnings are
indefinitely reinvested, primarily related to the cost method
investment made during the fourth quarter of 2006 (Note 6).
Also during the three months ended March 31, 2007, the
Company determined that $31.2 million of the undistributed
earnings will be indefinitely reinvested, primarily relating to
the cash required to establish and to fund the new European
clearing house that the Company will operate beginning in the
second half of 2008. The undistributed earnings that had been
indefinitely reinvested total $82.3 million and
$51.0 million as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company further determined that
all prior undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries
will be indefinitely reinvested. The Company made this
determination on the basis of sufficient evidence that
demonstrates that it will invest the undistributed earnings
overseas indefinitely. Under APB Opinion No. 23, when it
becomes apparent that some or all of the undistributed earnings
of a foreign subsidiary on which income taxes have been accrued
in the past will not be remitted in the foreseeable future, then
the parent company should adjust income tax expense of the
current period to reflect this change. The Company reduced tax
expense by $3.6 million and $4.8 million for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to reflect
the decision to indefinitely reinvest these prior undistributed
earnings. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred
U.S. income tax liability on the undistributed earnings of
the Companys foreign subsidiaries is not practicable.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the Jobs Act) introduced a special one-time
dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain
foreign earnings in 2004 or 2005, provided certain criteria are
met. The deduction resulted in an approximate 5.25% federal tax
rate on repatriated earnings. To qualify for the deduction, the
earnings must be reinvested in the U.S. pursuant to a
domestic reinvestment plan established by the Companys
chief executive officer and approved by the Companys board
of directors. Certain other criteria in the Jobs Act must be
satisfied as well. In 2005, the Company completed its evaluation
of the repatriation provision and repatriated $35.0 million
of foreign earnings in accordance with the requirements of the
Jobs Act. As a result, the Company recognized a tax benefit of
$2.0 million, net of available foreign tax credits.
The Jobs Act tax benefit was offset by tax expense of
$2.0 million recorded for the year ended December 31,
2005 related to an increase to the estimate of
U.S. residual taxes due on the remaining undistributed
earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries. The impact
of this $2.0 million increase in the U.S. residual
taxes decreased earnings per share by $0.04 during the year
ended December 31, 2005.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
13,173
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
Additions based on tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Reductions resulting from statute of limitation lapses
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
11,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of the adoption date of FIN 48, the Company had
unrecognized tax benefits of $13.2 million of which
$5.0 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate. The Company recorded a decrease to unrecognized tax
benefits of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2007, of
which approximately $2.4 million and $1.6 million
increased income tax expense for the year and three months ended
December 31, 2007, respectively. As of December 31,
2007, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of
$12.0 million, of which $4.6 million, if recognized,
would affect the effective tax rate. The Company recognizes
interest accrued related to income tax uncertainties as a
component of interest expense. Any related penalties, if
incurred, would be included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Interest expense related to the
unrecognized tax benefits totaled $478,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Accrued interest and penalties were
$1.5 million and $1.9 million as of January 1,
2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Company currently anticipates the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits to decrease by $462,000 by December 31, 2008. The
unrecognized tax benefit, related to research and development
and investment tax credits claimed, nexus and the classification
of income, would decrease due to the closing of the related
statue of limitations of the jurisdiction where reported and the
filing of tax returns. The Company or one of its subsidiaries
files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction,
and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
U.S. federal, state, local or foreign examinations by tax
authorities for years before 2004.
Related-parties include principal owners of the Company and
other parties that control or can significantly influence the
management or operating policies of the Company. Principal
owners include any party that owns more than 10% of the voting
interest in or common stock of the Company. During the year
ended December 31, 2005, the Company had two shareholders
who held more than 10% of the common stock of the Company and
are considered related-parties. In connection with the
Companys secondary offering of common stock on
July 21, 2006, the voting interest of the two shareholders
of the Company who previously held more than 10% of the common
stock of the Company fell below the 10% threshold. Therefore,
beginning on July 21, 2006, these two shareholders are no
longer considered related-parties for disclosure purposes. The
Company has classified all companies that had board of director
participation as a related-party due to their significant
influence over the Company. Revenues earned from related-parties
of the Company totaled $1.7 million, $16.1 million and
$17.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2007 and
2006, the Company had $777,000 and $448,000, respectively, in
accounts receivable from related-parties.
The Company had a stock put agreement with Continental Power
Exchange, Inc., which is the Companys predecessor company
and which is owned by the chief executive officer of the
Company. The stock put was canceled in November 2005. See
note 10 for more detail on this related-party stock put
agreement.
|
|
14.
|
Unearned
Government Grant
|
In November 2002, ICE Futures U.S. entered into a ten-year
agreement with the New York State Urban Development Corporation
d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC).
As a result of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center
on September 11, 2001, the ESDC, in cooperation with the
New York City Economic Development Corporation d/b/a New York
City Industrial Development Agency, determined that ICE Futures
U.S. was eligible for assistance under the World Trade
Center Job Creation and Retention Program. In November 2002, ICE
Futures U.S. received a cash grant of $23.3 million
for fixed asset investment. This agreement requires ICE Futures
U.S. to maintain certain annual employment levels in a
certain geographic area of New York City and the grant is
subject to recapture amounts on a declining scale over a ten
year term if ICE Futures U.S. employment levels fall below
the minimum level. The grant is recognized in the income
statement ratably in accordance with the ten-year recapture
schedule as a credit to depreciation and amortization expense.
133
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, the potential recapture amount had
decreased to $10.5 million and is scheduled to decrease by
$1.7 million at the end of each fiscal year going forward.
The following is a schedule of future grant amortization as of
December 31, 2007 of each year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,748
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Clearing
Organizations
|
ICE Clear U.S. (formerly known as the New York Clearing
Corporation or NYCC), the clearing organization for ICE Futures
U.S., performs the clearing and settlement of every futures and
options on futures contract traded through ICE Futures
U.S. ICE Clear Canada (formerly known as the WCE Clearing
Corporation), the clearing organization for ICE Futures Canada,
performs the clearing and settlement of every futures and
options on futures contract traded through ICE Futures Canada.
ICE Clear U.S. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ICE Futures Canada (ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada are
referred to herein collectively as the ICE Clearing
Houses). Each of the ICE Clearing Houses have equal and
offsetting claims to and from their respective clearing members
on opposite sides of each contract, standing as an intermediary
on every contract cleared. ICE Clear U.S. serves as the
intermediary for any cleared futures contract or option until
the first to occur of: (i) the liquidation of such futures
contract or option by the holder through an offsetting trade,
(ii) the exercise or assignment of any option (after which
ICE Clear U.S. continues as intermediary for the futures
contract issued pursuant to such exercise), (iii) final
cash settlement of the futures contract, or (iv) issuance
of a delivery notice by ICE Clear U.S. to the receiver with
respect to a futures contract of a deliverer. ICE Clear Canada
also performs as the intermediary for any cleared futures
contract or option until the same events above occur with the
exception of event (iii) since cash settlement is not an
option at ICE Futures Canada. To the extent that funds are not
otherwise available to satisfy an obligation under an applicable
contract, the ICE Clearing Houses bear counterparty credit risk
in the event that future market movements create conditions that
could lead to clearing members failing to meet their obligations
to the clearing organization. The ICE Clearing Houses reduce
their exposure through a risk management program that includes
initial and ongoing financial standards for admission as a
clearing member, original and variation margin requirements,
mandatory deposits to a guaranty fund and the ability to assess
clearing members.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses require all clearing members to
maintain on deposit with it cash, money market mutual fund
shares, U.S. Government obligations (with respect to ICE
Clear U.S.), Canadian Government obligations (with respect to
ICE Clear Canada) or letters of credit to secure payment of
variation margin as may become due from the clearing members,
and such deposits in total are known as original margin. ICE
Clear U.S. marks all outstanding futures contracts to
market at least twice daily and pay and collect option premium
daily. ICE Clear Canada marks all outstanding positions to
market once per day. Clearing members that experience net losses
from future and option positions at the end of the trading day
are required to pay the relevant ICE Clearing House the amount
of those net losses in cash by 9:00 am the following morning.
Likewise, clearing members that experience net collects are paid
those net profits by the relevant ICE Clearing House in cash.
For the
intra-day
mark to market, ICE Clear U.S. clearing members are
required to deposit all losses in excess of $100,000 within 60
minutes of notice and ICE Clear Canada clearing members are
required to make any required payment exceeding $10,000 within
60 minutes of notice. Clearing members with collects greater
than $250,000 will be paid those profits by the relevant ICE
Clearing House in
134
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
cash. The payments of profits and losses are known as variation
margin. Generally, any significant overnight balance in the
clearance account is invested in money market mutual funds.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses require that each clearing
member make deposits in a fund known as a guaranty or clearing
fund (Guaranty Fund), that is maintained by the
relevant ICE Clearing House. These amounts serve to secure the
obligations of a clearing member to the ICE Clearing House to
which it has made the Guaranty Fund deposits and may be used to
cover losses sustained by the respective ICE Clearing House as a
result of the default of the clearing member. All income earned
from investing clearing members cash deposits in the
Guaranty Fund belongs to the respective ICE Clearing House and
is included in interest income in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income.
Should a particular clearing member fail to deposit original
margin, or to make a variation margin payment, when and as
required, the relevant ICE Clearing House may liquidate its open
positions and use its original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits
to make up the amount owed. In the event that those deposits are
not sufficient to pay that amount in full, it may utilize the
Guaranty Fund deposits of all clearing members for that purpose.
In addition, the relevant ICE Clearing House may assess its
clearing members to meet any remaining shortfall. As of
December 31, 2007, margin cash deposits and Guaranty Fund
cash deposits are as follows for ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Clear Canada (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S.
|
|
|
ICE Clear Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
774,593
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
774,975
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
6,554
|
|
|
|
14,449
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
784,256
|
|
|
$
|
7,796
|
|
|
$
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded these cash deposits in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as current assets with offsetting
current liabilities to the clearing members who deposited the
funds. The majority of deposit balances are denominated in
foreign currencies. Any foreign currency gains or losses on the
assets are fully offset by foreign currency gains or losses on
the offsetting liabilities. All cash, securities and letters of
credit are only available to meet the financial obligations of
that clearing firm to the relevant ICE Clearing House. ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada are separate legal entities and
are not subject to the liabilities of the other clearing house
or the obligations of the members of the other clearing house.
These cash deposits may fluctuate due to the investment choices
available to clearing members and the change in the amount of
deposits required. As a result, these assets and offsetting
liabilities may vary significantly over time.
ICE Clear U.S. has credit risk for maintaining these cash
deposits at various financial institutions. These deposits at
times may be in excess of federally insured limits. ICE Clear
U.S. monitors these deposits and mitigates credit risk by
keeping such deposits in several financial institutions. At ICE
Clear Canada, all cash deposits are held at the central clearing
bank. The ICE Clearing Houses have not experienced losses
related to these deposits.
In addition to the cash original margin, variation margin, and
Guaranty Fund deposits made to the relevant ICE Clearing House,
clearing members also pledge assets, including
U.S. Government obligations, Canadian Government
obligations, money market mutual funds and letters of credit, to
the relevant ICE Clearing House to mitigate its credit risk. The
U.S. Government obligations, Canadian Government
obligations, money market mutual funds and letters of credit are
held in safekeeping and any interest and gain or loss accrues to
the clearing member. These pledged assets are not reflected in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007 as the ICE Clearing Houses do not take
legal ownership. The ICE Clearing Houses have controlling
interest of accounts where these assets are held at the
financial institutions and depositories. The amount that the
clearing members are required to maintain in the original margin
and
135
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Guaranty Fund accounts is determined by parameters established
by the risk management department and the Board of the ICE
Clearing Houses and may fluctuate over time.
As of December 31, 2007, the U.S. Government
obligations and money market mutual funds pledged by the
clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits
for ICE Clear U.S. are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
Money
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
Mutual Fund
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
3,139,010
|
|
|
$
|
834,310
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
94,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,233,453
|
|
|
$
|
834,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Canadian Government
obligations and letters of credit pledged by the clearing
members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits for ICE
Clear Canada are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Letters
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
of Credit
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
40,897
|
|
|
$
|
18,925
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
17,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58,648
|
|
|
$
|
18,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has agreed to reserve $50.0 million of the
$250.0 million available under the revolving credit
facility for use by ICE Clear U.S. to provide liquidity in
the event of default by a clearing participant (Note 9).
ICE Clear Canada has also arranged a total of $3.0 million
in revolving standby credit facilities with the Royal Bank of
Canada to provide liquidity in the event of default by a
clearing participant (Note 9).
ICE Futures Canada receives cash and non-cash deposits relating
to deliveries of commodity futures contracts by certain
participants. The Company has recorded the delivery performance
cash deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as
current assets with offsetting current liabilities. As of
December 31, 2007, the amount of delivery performance cash
deposits held by ICE Futures Canada was $1.1 million and is
reflected in prepaid expenses and other current assets and in
other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet. The letters of credit held by ICE Futures Canada
as non-cash delivery performance deposits as of
December 31, 2007, and not reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet, were $11.6 million.
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
The Company leases office space, equipment facilities, and
certain computer equipment. As of December 31, 2007, future
minimum lease payments under these noncancelable operating
agreements are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10,721
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,385
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
2012
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company had no capital lease obligations as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006. Rental expense amounted to
$11.8 million, $4.0 million and $3.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Russell
Licensing Agreement
On June 15, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive
licensing agreement (the Licensing Agreement) with
the Frank Russell Company (Russell) to offer futures
and options on futures contracts based on the full range of
Russells industry-leading benchmark U.S. equity
indexes, including the Russell
1000®
Index, Russell
2000®
Index and Russell
3000®
Index, as well as the related value and growth indexes offered
by Russell. Under the Licensing Agreement, the Company and its
affiliates will have exclusive rights to list futures contracts
and options on futures contracts based on the full range of
Russells benchmark U.S. equity indexes. Prior to this
Licensing Agreement, ICE Futures U.S. had the ability to
trade futures and options on futures on the Russell
1000®,
Russell
2000®
and Russell
3000®,
including certain mini and full-size contracts, as
well as the Russell 1000
Growth®
and Russell 1000
Value®
Indexes and the Russell 2000
Growth®
and Russell 2000
Value®
Indexes.
The Licensing Agreement will result in the termination of all
other valid licenses on futures and options on futures based on
the Russell indexes. Due to the wind down provisions of existing
Russell contracts, during the first year of the Licensing
Agreement, the Company has the ability to offer the Russell
licenses on a non-exclusive basis. These rights will become
exclusive starting in the third quarter of 2008, and will remain
exclusive throughout the remainder of the agreement. The term of
the Licensing Agreement is seven years (through July 1,
2014), after which time it will be automatically renewed for
successive one-year terms unless either party provides a written
notice to the other party to not renew the Licensing Agreement.
Beginning three years after the effective date of the Licensing
Agreement, the Company will be required to maintain a minimum
level of average trading volume per quarter to preserve the
exclusive rights granted to it under the Licensing Agreement.
In exchange for the license rights, the Company paid Russell
$50.0 million in July 2007 and will also make annual
royalty payments based on the annual contract trade volumes,
subject to certain minimum annual royalty payments. The Company
has recorded the purchased license rights as intangible assets,
which were valued based on the net present value of all minimum
annual royalty payments that the Company is required to make to
Russell throughout the term of the agreement. As of
December 31, 2007, the assets related to the Licensing
Agreement are $149.7 million and are included in other
intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. The intangible assets will be amortized based on the
Companys valuations of the non-exclusive and the exclusive
periods of the Licensing Agreement. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, amortization expense related to the
Licensing Agreement was $83,000, which reflects amortization on
the non-exclusive portion of the intangible asset as the
exclusive period has not commenced.
Since the Company is required to pay minimum annual royalty
payments in order to maintain the Russell license rights, the
Company has also recorded a liability based on the net present
value of the total required payments as of the effective date of
the Licensing Agreement. As of December 31, 2007, the
current and noncurrent liabilities relating to the minimum
annual royalty payments of the Licensing Agreement are
$10.6 million and $89.6 million, respectively, and are
reflected as licensing agreement liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The difference between the present
value of the payments and the actual payments is recorded as
interest expense using the effective interest method over the
term of the Licensing Agreement. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, interest expense related to the
Licensing Agreement was $3.1 million.
137
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Patent
Licensing Agreement
In March 2002, the Company entered into a long-term,
non-exclusive licensing agreement with eSpeed, Inc.
(eSpeed), which granted the use of eSpeeds
patent to the Company and its majority-owned and controlled
affiliates. Under the agreement, the Company was required to pay
minimum annual license fees of $2.0 million beginning in
April 2002 through the expiration date of the patent in February
2007 along with additional royalty payments calculated quarterly
based upon the volume of certain futures transactions executed
on the Platform. The Company recorded amortization expense of
$283,000, $2.2 million and $2.0 million during the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
relating to the licensing agreement. The Company paid royalty
payments of $1.7 million, $9.0 million and
$1.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, which were recorded as patent
royalty expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income. The licensing agreement and related patent expired in
February 2007 and no future payments are required.
ICE
Futures U.S. eSpeed Agreement
In 2004, ICE Futures U.S. entered into an agreement with
eSpeed that terminated a previous agreement with eSpeed which
had provided for the establishment of an electronic marketplace,
in exchange for a one-time cash payment in 2004 and a commitment
to make variable cash payments to eSpeed based on the number of
electronic contracts traded on ICE Futures U.S. through
September 2017. The variable payment has a cap of
$1.0 million per year. These payments may be adjusted
annually for changes in the Consumer Price Index. ICE Futures
U.S. began executing electronic trades on February 2,
2007. Based on the electronic trading volumes for the year ended
December 31, 2007, ICE Futures U.S. triggered the cap
on the variable payment and expensed $1.0 million as
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Middle
East Sour Crude Oil Futures Contract Liquidity Provider
Program
On May 21, 2007, the Company listed for trading the ICE
Middle East Sour Crude futures contract through ICE Futures
Europe. The contract was offered free of trading fees for an
initial three-month period for all customers (which has been
extended to an initial nine-month period), except for those
trades that occur off exchange. An incentive program for
liquidity providers was promoted in conjunction with the launch
of the contract. ICE Futures Europe notified participants in the
initial program of its termination on October 19, 2007 at
which point it was replaced with a revised program.
Under the terms of the revised program, five liquidity providers
will trade without charge for an additional period as long as
they meet certain market making obligations under the Middle
East Sour Crude futures liquidity provider program until
April 15, 2008. The market making obligations require the
liquidity providers to maintain two-sided markets consisting of
a simultaneous bid and offer during certain times and based on
certain prices. In addition to free trading, the liquidity
providers will also receive (i) a monthly stipend of
$30,000 per liquidity provider each month and (ii) a share
in a liquidity provider pool program (the Liquidity
Provider Pool), that is to be established in each year
beginning in 2008 through 2015 (the Measurement
Period).
The Liquidity Provider Pool will be valued at 50% of the overall
transaction fees received by ICE Futures Europe in relation to
trading in the ICE Middle East Sour Crude futures contract in
each calendar year of the Measurement Period, net of certain
expenses and taxes. The Liquidity Provider Pool will be
allocated between the eligible liquidity providers based on the
following: (i) 20% allocated equally among the eligible
liquidity providers, (ii) 40% allocated on the basis of the
extent of their market making obligations, and (iii) 40%
allocated on the basis of contract volumes traded by the
liquidity providers during that calendar year of the Measurement
Period. However, there is a 40% cap on the share in the annual
Liquidity Provider Pool that any one liquidity provider can
receive in any calendar year in the Measurement Period. Payments
under the
138
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
provisions of the Liquidity Provider Pool will be in the first
quarter of the subsequent calendar year during the Measurement
Period.
Employment
Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with all of
its corporate officers. If the corporate officers are terminated
without cause, the employment agreements result in separation
payments ranging from six months to three years of the corporate
officers annual base salary. In some cases, the employment
agreements also stipulate an additional payment for bonus
compensation for the balance of the term of the employment
agreement. Also, certain employment agreements have provisions
that provide for termination payments following a change of
control and corresponding loss of employment, which generally
provide for base salary, bonus payment, benefits continuation
for the full term of the employment agreement (ranging from one
to three years), gross up payment for any excise taxes due under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the
acceleration of vesting of any stock options granted after the
execution of the employment agreements.
The Companys U.K. subsidiaries, in accordance with normal
U.K. practice, have entered into employment agreements with all
of its employees. The employment agreements require a severance
notice ranging from one to six months.
Legal
Proceedings
On September 29, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York granted the Companys motion
for summary judgment dismissing all claims brought by the New
York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) against the
Company in an action commenced in November 2002. NYMEXs
complaint alleged copyright infringement by the Company on the
basis of its use of NYMEXs publicly available settlement
prices in two of the Companys cleared OTC contracts. The
complaint also alleged that the Company infringe and dilute
NYMEXs trademark rights by referring to NYMEX trademarks
in certain swap contract specifications and that the Company
tortiously interfered with a contract between NYMEX and the data
provider that provides the Company with the NYMEX settlement
prices pursuant to a license. In dismissing all of NYMEXs
claims, the court found that NYMEXs settlement prices were
not copyrightable works as a matter of law, and the Company had
not engaged in copyright or trademark infringement in
referencing NYMEXs publicly available settlement prices.
The trademark dilution and tortious interference claims, which
are state law claims, were dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
While the court granted summary judgment in the Companys
favor on all claims, NYMEX appealed the decision regarding the
copyright claims and state law claims in the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals. On August 1, 2007, the Second Circuit
Court of Appeals affirmed the District Courts grant of
motion for summary judgment in the Companys favor. On
August 15, 2007, NYMEX filed a Combined Petition for Panel
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, requesting that the case be
reheard before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On
October 25, 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
denied NYMEXs Combined Petition for a rehearing. On
January 16, 2008, NYMEX filed a writ of certiorari with the
U.S. Supreme Court seeking discretionary review of the
case, and the U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided
whether to hear the case. Should NYMEX be successful in its
appeal to the Supreme Court and the Company is subsequently
found to have infringed NYMEXs intellectual property
rights, the Company may incur substantial monetary damages and
may be enjoined from using or referring to one or more types of
NYMEX settlement prices.
As described below, a series of legal actions have existed
between the Company and Klein & Co. Futures, Inc.
(Klein). In December 2007, the parties mutually
agreed to settle all claims and disputes between the parties
with respect to the matters described below.
On July 26, 2000, Klein commenced a civil action, referred
to as the Klein Action, in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York against numerous defendants,
including ICE Futures U.S.,
139
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
various affiliates of ICE Futures U.S. and officials of ICE
Futures
U.S. and/or
its affiliates. Kleins claims arose out of its collapse in
the wake of the recalculation of settlement prices for futures
and options on the Pacific Stock Exchange Technology Index (an
index of technology stocks) in May 2000.
Klein purported to allege federal claims arising under the CEA
and various state law claims. On February 18, 2005, the
District Court dismissed Kleins CEA claims with prejudice
in accordance with Section 22(b) of the CEA for lack of
standing and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
Kleins state law claims. That decision was affirmed on
September 18, 2006, by a panel of the United States Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and a subsequent motion for
rehearing insomuch as the panel affirmed the District
Courts dismissal of its CEA claims against ICE Futures
U.S. and certain of its affiliates was denied. Klein then
filed a petition in the United States Supreme Court seeking to
appeal the decision of the United States Circuit Court on
March 14, 2007. The petition was granted and the appeal was
heard before the United States Supreme Court on
October 29, 2007.
In March 2007, Klein filed a parallel action in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, New York County, against certain
defendants, including ICE Futures U.S. and its former
president. The action alleged a claim of slander and libel
against ICE Futures U.S. and its former president relating
to certain statements made in connection with Kleins
collapse. In May 2007, ICE Futures U.S. filed a motion to
dismiss on multiple grounds. Oral argument was held in August
2007 but the motion was not decided by the court.
Also, on May 14, 2001, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Clear
U.S. commenced an action, referred to as ICE Futures
U.S.s Action, in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against Klein. ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Clear U.S. commenced this action in their
capacity as the assignees of certain claims that were held
against Klein by its former customers. ICE Futures U.S.s
Action sought to recover money owed by Klein to those customers
in the wake of Kleins collapse. In the same decision that
dismissed the Klein action, the District Court dismissed all of
Kleins counterclaims against ICE Futures U.S., denied ICE
Futures U.S.s motion for judgment on the pleadings and
found that the complaint in ICE Futures U.S.s Action did
not state a claim for which relief could be granted. However,
the District Court granted ICE Futures U.S. leave to
replead. On April 14, 2005, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE
Clear U.S. filed an amended complaint, which Klein
subsequently moved to dismiss. ICE Futures U.S. and ICE
Clear U.S. opposed that motion which was briefed on
August 5, 2005, but was never decided by the court.
As stated above, in December 2007 and prior to the Supreme
Courts ruling, the parties mutually agreed to settle all
claims and disputes between the parties through entry of an
omnibus settlement agreement whereby all claims and disputes
between them were released and all actions dismissed, with
prejudice, upon payment of an undisclosed amount by ICE Futures
U.S. to Klein. The payment under the settlement agreement
was a pre-acquisition contingency that existed as the time of
the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. Therefore, the payment to
Klein was accrued as a liability in the purchase price
allocation and had no income statement impact.
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, County of New York, granted ICE Futures U.S.s motion
to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced
on December 8, 2006, by certain holders of non-equity
trading permits (Permit Holders), of ICE Futures
U.S. seeking declaratory, monetary and injunctive relief
with respect to the acquisition by the Company. Plaintiffs
alleged that, in violation of contract rights
and/or
rights under New Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, ICE
Futures U.S.s Permit Holders, including plaintiffs, were
not permitted to vote with respect to the merger and would not
receive any part of the merger consideration. Plaintiffs sought
(i) to enjoin consummation of the merger,
(ii) declaratory relief regarding their past and future
rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of unspecified
damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of
contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. The court also
denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.
On February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders perfected their
appeal from the lower courts ruling dismissing their
complaint. The Permit Holders did not
140
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
pursue an appeal of the lower courts denial of their
request for an order enjoining the merger. ICE Futures
U.S. will oppose the appeal and seek affirmance of the
lower courts decision.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that
arise in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company
does not believe that the resolution of these matters, including
those specifically discussed above, will have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition,
results of operations, or liquidity. It is possible, however,
that future results of operations for any particular quarterly
or annual period could be materially and adversely affected by
any new developments relating to these proceedings and claims.
|
|
17.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Companys U.K.-based subsidiaries have a defined
contribution pension plan for eligible employees. The Company
contributes a percentage of the employees base salary to
the plan each month and employees are also able to make
additional voluntary contributions, subject to plan and
statutory limits. The Companys contribution ranges from
10% to 20% of the employees base salary. Total pension
contributions made by the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $982,000, $832,000
and $879,000, respectively.
The Companys ICE Futures U.S. employees are eligible
to participate in ICE Futures U.S.s 401(k) and Profit
Sharing Plan (the NY 401(k) Plan). The Company
offers a match of 50% of the first 4% of the eligible
employees compensation contributed to the NY 401(k) Plan,
subject to plan and statutory limits, and an annual
discretionary contribution. Total matching contributions and
discretionary contributions under the NY 401(k) Plan for the
year ended December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million.
The remaining employees of the Companys
U.S. operations are eligible to participate in the
Companys 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the 401(k)
Plan). The Company offers a match of 100% of the first 5%
of the eligible employees compensation contributed to the
401(k) Plan, subject to plan and statutory limits. Total
matching contributions under the Companys 401(k) Plan for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were
$1.1 million, $860,000 and $669,000, respectively. No
discretionary or profit sharing contributions were made during
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
|
|
18.
|
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
|
The Company incurred incremental direct merger-related
transaction costs of $11.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 relating to the proposed merger with CBOT
Holdings, Inc. (CBOT). Ultimately, CBOTs board
of directors did not accept the Companys proposal to merge
with CBOT, and instead accepted an improved proposal from the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. (CME),
which resulted in a completed transaction between CME and CBOT
on July 13, 2007. The $11.1 million in merger-related
transaction costs included investment banking advisors, legal,
accounting, proxy advisor, public relation services and other
external costs directly related to the proposed transaction.
These costs have been recorded as CBOT merger-related
transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In January 2004, EBS Dealing Resources, Inc. (EBS),
filed a complaint against the Company in United States
District Court, Southern District of New York, alleging that the
Company infringed upon two patents held by EBS related to credit
filter technology for electronic brokerage systems. In September
2005, the Company settled the legal action brought by EBS
related to the alleged patent infringement. Under the settlement
agreement, the Company made a payment of $15.0 million to
EBS, and was released from the legal
141
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
claims brought against it without admitting liability. The
payment was classified as Settlement expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income for the year
ended December 31, 2005.
On April 7, 2005, the Company closed its open-outcry
trading floor in London. This was done to take advantage of the
increasing acceptance and adoption of electronic trading, and to
maintain and enhance the Companys competitive position.
All energy futures trading is now conducted exclusively on the
Companys electronic platform. The Company recorded floor
closure costs of $4.8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005 in connection with the closure of the
open-outcry trading floor. These costs include lease
terminations for the building where the floor was located,
payments made to 18 employees who were terminated as a
result of the closure, contract terminations, and other
associated costs, including legal costs and asset impairment
charges. This expense was classified as Floor closure
costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income, and recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, and SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits. The following table
reflects the components of the floor closure cost charge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor Closure Cost
|
|
|
|
Expense-Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Lease termination costs
|
|
$
|
2,572
|
|
Employee termination benefits
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
Other contract termination costs
|
|
|
273
|
|
Other associated costs
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total floor closure costs
|
|
$
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of floor closure costs for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $14,000,
$1.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively. All of
the Companys floor closure costs are attributable to the
futures business segment.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Companys
principal business segments consist of its OTC business segment,
its futures business segment and its market data business
segment. The operations of ICE Futures Europe, ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada make up the futures business
segment and the operations of ICE Data make up the market data
business segment. The remaining companies, including the
acquisitions of ChemConnect, Chatham and Commoditrack, have been
included in the OTC business segment as they primarily support
the Companys OTC business operations. In the prior
quarters in 2007 only, the Company reported four business
segments; its OTC business segment, its U.K. futures business
segment, its U.S. futures business segment and its market
data business segment. As of December 31, 2007, the Company
combined the U.K. futures business segment and the
U.S. futures business segment into one futures business
segment in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as this
is how it was reported internally and provided to the
Companys chief operating decision maker.
142
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Intersegment revenues and transactions attributable to the
performance of services are recorded at cost plus an agreed
market percentage intercompany profit. Intersegment revenues
attributable to licensing transactions have been priced in
accordance with comparable third party agreements. The
accounting policies of the business segments are the same as
those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. Financial data for the Companys business
segments and geographic areas are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
241,803
|
|
|
$
|
289,333
|
|
|
$
|
43,157
|
|
|
$
|
574,293
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
32,311
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
19,079
|
|
|
|
55,144
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,286
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
|
|
5,747
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
11,865
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
15,658
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,641
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,907
|
|
|
|
64,005
|
|
|
|
19,910
|
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
79,199
|
|
|
|
126,024
|
|
|
|
35,389
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,654,133
|
|
|
|
1,122,279
|
|
|
|
19,933
|
|
|
|
2,796,345
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
38,044
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
43,266
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,397,696
|
|
|
|
149,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
115,541
|
|
|
|
120,249
|
|
|
|
51,991
|
|
|
|
287,781
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
376,012
|
|
|
$
|
198,281
|
|
|
$
|
574,293
|
|
As of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
60,874
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
143
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues from one customer of the futures business segment
comprised 11.5% of the Companys futures revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2007. No additional customers
accounted for more than 10% of the Companys segment
revenues or consolidated revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
168,743
|
|
|
$
|
127,024
|
|
|
$
|
18,032
|
|
|
$
|
313,799
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
26,704
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
42,231
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,858
|
|
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
77,494
|
|
|
|
52,164
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
414,193
|
|
|
|
71,972
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
493,211
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
18,068
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
19,815
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
68,884
|
|
|
|
64,730
|
|
|
|
17,075
|
|
|
|
150,689
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Union
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
178,100
|
|
|
$
|
135,699
|
|
|
$
|
313,799
|
|
As of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
4,460
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
144
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues from two customers of the futures business segment
comprised 15.4% and 12.1% of the Companys futures revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2006. No additional
customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys
segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
84,179
|
|
|
$
|
60,082
|
|
|
$
|
11,604
|
|
|
$
|
155,865
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
5,108
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
18,006
|
|
Floor closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
Settlement expense
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
12,609
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
7,698
|
|
|
|
9,606
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
19,585
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
18,335
|
|
|
|
17,838
|
|
|
|
4,237
|
|
|
|
40,410
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
213,518
|
|
|
|
47,473
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
|
265,770
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
9,557
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
20,459
|
|
|
|
23,719
|
|
|
|
5,634
|
|
|
|
49,812
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Union
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
90,202
|
|
|
$
|
65,663
|
|
|
$
|
155,865
|
|
As of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,974
|
|
|
|
8,374
|
|
|
|
20,348
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
Revenues from one customer of the futures business segment
comprised 13.3% of the Companys futures revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2005. No additional customers
accounted for more than 10% of the Companys segment
revenues or consolidated revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
145
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Earnings
Per Common Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share
computations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
(20,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of outstanding stock options is considered to be
antidilutive in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
when a net loss available to common shareholders is reported.
The Companys outstanding stock options have not been
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share during
the year ended December 31, 2005 due to the
$20.9 million net loss available to common shareholders as
a result of the $61.3 million charged to retained earnings
related to the redeemable stock put adjustments. Therefore, the
Companys diluted earnings per share is computed in the
same manner as basic earnings per share during the year ended
December 31, 2005. If the Company had reported net income
available to common shareholders during the year ended
December 31, 2005, the diluted earnings per share would
have been based on 54.4 million in adjusted diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding, which includes
1.2 million stock options and restricted stock having a
dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2005.
146
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
23.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
The following table has been prepared from the financial records
of the Company, and reflects all adjustments that are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of operations for the interim periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
Qtr(a)
|
|
|
2nd
Qtr(b)
|
|
|
3rd
Qtr
|
|
|
4th
Qtr
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
126,608
|
|
|
$
|
136,654
|
|
|
$
|
151,735
|
|
|
$
|
159,296
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
79,643
|
|
|
|
76,529
|
|
|
|
100,864
|
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
|
55,586
|
|
|
|
53,693
|
|
|
|
66,681
|
|
|
|
64,652
|
|
Earnings per common share(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
50,282
|
|
|
$
|
73,591
|
|
|
$
|
94,662
|
|
|
$
|
95,264
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
27,653
|
|
|
|
47,416
|
|
|
|
65,382
|
|
|
|
64,184
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
|
19,664
|
|
|
|
30,967
|
|
|
|
43,645
|
|
|
|
48,992
|
|
Earnings per common share(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company recognized a net gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million during the first quarter of 2007.
(Note 4). |
|
(b) |
|
The Company recognized $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the second quarter of 2007
(Note 18). |
|
(c) |
|
The annual earnings per common share may not equal the sum of
the individual quarters earnings per common share due to
rounding. |
147
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9(A).
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. As of the end of the period covered
by this report, an evaluation was carried out by our management,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions
were taken.
(c) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting and the Attestation Report of the
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm. Managements report on its assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007 and the attestation
report of Ernst & Young LLP on our internal control
over financial reporting are set forth in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9(B).
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information relating to our Board of Directors set forth under
the captions Proposal 1 Election of
Directors Nominees for Election as Directors at the
2008 Annual Meeting and Proposal 1
Election of Directors Continuing Directors in
our Proxy Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(2008 Proxy Statement) is incorporated herein by
reference. Information relating to our executive officers is,
pursuant to Instruction 3 of Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K
and General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K,
set forth at Part I, Item 4(A) of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Information regarding
compliance by our directors and executive officers and owners of
more than ten percent of our Common Stock with the reporting
requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, set forth under the caption
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the 2008
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. Information
relating to our financial expert serving on our Audit Committee
(Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K),
our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(Item 407(c)(3) of
Regulation S-K),
our Audit Committee (Item 407(d)(4) of
Regulation S-K)
and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
(Item 405 of
Regulation S-K),
is set forth under the caption Meetings and Committees of
the Board in our 2008 Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which
applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. Our
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct meets the requirements of a
code of ethics as defined by Item 406 of
Regulation S-K,
and applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (who is the principal financial and principal accounting
officer), as well as all other employees, as indicated above.
Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct also meets the
requirements of a code of ethics and business
148
conduct under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Our
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website
at www.theice.com under the heading Investor
Resources. We will also provide a copy of the Code of
Ethics and Business Conduct to stockholders at no charge upon
written request.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information relating to executive compensation set forth under
the captions Proposal 1 Election of
Directors Directors Compensation,
Executive Compensation and Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in our 2008
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference, except for
the information set forth in the section entitled
Executive Compensation Report of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive
Compensation, which specifically is not so incorporated by
reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information regarding ownership of our common stock by certain
persons as set forth under the caption Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in our 2008
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. In
addition, information in tabular form relating to securities
authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is
set forth under the caption Equity Compensation Plan
Information and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information regarding certain relationships and transactions
between our company and certain of our affiliates as set forth
under the caption Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions in our 2008 Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference. In addition, information regarding our
directors independence (Item 407(a) of
Regulation S-K)
as set forth under the caption Proposal 1
Election of Directors Nominees for Election as
Directors as the 2008 Annual Meeting in our 2008 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services of
our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, is set forth under the caption
Principal Accountant Fees and Services in our 2008
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Documents Filed as Part of this Report.
(1) Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements and the related reports of
management and independent registered public accounting firm
which are required to be filed as part of this Report are
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These consolidated financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Consolidated Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts is included as a schedule herein.
Schedules not listed have been omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is included in the
consolidated financial statements or notes, thereto.
(3) Exhibits
See (b) below.
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits listed below under Index to Exhibits
are filed with or incorporated by reference in this Report.
Where such filing is made by incorporation by reference to a
previously filed registration statement or report, such
registration statement or report is identified in parentheses.
We will furnish any exhibit upon request to Investor Relations,
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328.
150
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chief Executive Officer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey C. Sprecher and
Scott A. Hill, and each of them his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the calendar year ended December 31, 2007, and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as
of the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott
A. Hill
Scott
A. Hill
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial
and accounting officer)
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles
R. Crisp
Charles
R. Crisp
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Fredrick
W. Hatfield
Fredrick
W. Hatfield
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jean-Marc
Forneri
Jean-Marc
Forneri
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terrence
F. Martell
Terrence
F. Martell
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sir
Robert Reid
Sir
Robert Reid
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederic
V. Salerno
Frederic
V. Salerno
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
L. Sandor
Richard
L. Sandor, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Fred
W. Schoenhut
Fred
W. Schoenhut
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Judith
A. Sprieser
Judith
A. Sprieser
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent
Tese
Vincent
Tese
|
|
Director
|
|
February 13, 2008
|
152
FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULE
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Description
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
Deductions(2)
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
(814
|
)
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Additions charged to costs and expenses for the allowance for
doubtful accounts are based on our historical collection
experiences and managements assessment of the
collectibility of specific accounts. Additions to the deferred
income tax valuation allowance relate to state research and
development tax credits which the Company does not expect to
realize. This column also includes the foreign currency
translation adjustments. |
|
(2) |
|
Deductions represent the write-off of uncollectible receivables,
net of recoveries. |
153
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed with this Report. We will
furnish any exhibit upon request to IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc., Investor Relations, 2100 RiverEdge Parkway,
Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Merger Agreement, dated September 14, 2006, among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., Board of Trade of the City of
New York, Inc., and CFC Acquisition Co., including the forms of
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the surviving
corporation which are Exhibits A and B to the Merger
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
ICEs registration statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the SEC on November 16, 2006, File
No. 333-138312).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Merger Agreement, dated as of
October 30, 2006, among IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.,
Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc., and CFC
Acquisition Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2
to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-4,
filed with the SEC on November 16, 2006, File
No. 333-138312).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to ICEs Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to ICEs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2004,
between IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Jeffrey C. Sprecher
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2003, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Charles A. Vice (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ICEs registration
statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2003, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Richard V. Spencer
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2006, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and David S. Goone (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2003, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Edwin D. Marcial
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2004, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Johnathan H. Short
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
filed with the SEC on May 21, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Deferral
Plan for Outside Directors (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to ICEs Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to ICEs
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006,
File No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ICEs
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
filed with the SEC on May 21, 2007,
File No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of October 9,
2003, between The London Clearing House Limited and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Clearing Services Agreement, dated as of October 2003, between
The International Petroleum Exchange of London Limited and The
London Clearing House Limited (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
TRS Application Services Agreement, dated as of
April 25, 2001, between The International Petroleum
Exchange of London Limited and LIFFE Services Company Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2007, among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and other Lenders named therein (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 12, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the Lenders named therein dated as of
August 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 30, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Patent License Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2002,
between eSpeed, Inc. and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Office Lease, dated as of June 8, 2000, as amended, between
CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
AT&T Master Agreement (MA Reference No. MA
35708) and Addendum to Master Agreement, dated as of
April 8, 2002, between AT&T Corporation and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 13, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Lease of Part (Offices) (WTC/Q/W (Part): 2.18.1, dated
April 24, 1996, between Clipper Investments Limited and The
International Petroleum Exchange of London Limited (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to ICEs registration
statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Resident Members Agreement, dated as of December 2,
1983, between St.
Katharine-By-The-Tower
Limited and Aegis Insurance Services Group Limited (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to ICEs registration
statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Resident Members Agreement, dated as of November 28,
1991, between St.
Katharine-By-The-Tower
Limited and The International Petroleum Exchange of London
Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Lease of Part (Offices) (Suite Ref. 2.17), dated as of
April 28, 2003, between Inter One Limited and Inter Two
Limited and The International Petroleum Exchange of London
Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to
ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Deed of Novation, dated July 22, 2005, between The
International Petroleum Exchange of London Limited, LIFFE
Services Limited, Atos Euronext Market Solutions Limited, and
LIFFE Administration and Management (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.25 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Settlement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005, by and
between EBS Group Limited and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Six, dated as of October 12, 2005, by and
between CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and the parties listed in
Annex A thereto (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.30 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement, dated as of
May 11, 2000, by and between IntercontinentalExchange, LLC,
Continental Power Exchange, Inc., and Jeffrey C. Sprecher
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement,
dated as of May 17, 2000, by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC, Continental Power Exchange, Inc.,
and Jeffrey C. Sprecher (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement,
dated as of October 24, 2005, by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., Continental Power Exchange,
Inc., and Jeffrey C. Sprecher (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.33 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Seven, dated as of May 12, 2006, by and
between CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to ICEs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).*
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 30, 2007, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Scott A. Hill (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on May 2, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
|
|
License Agreement For Index-Related Derivative Products dated as
of June 15, 2007 between IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
Frank Russell Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on June 20, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).*
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Power of Attorney (included with signature page hereto).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of
Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of
Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Confidential treatment has been previously requested or granted
to portions of this exhibit by the SEC. |
156