UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 1-9328
ECOLAB INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
41-0231510 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
370 Wabasha Street N., St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
1-800-232-6522
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Not Applicable)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of July 31, 2011.
231,958,167 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30 |
| ||||
(millions, except per share) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,698.8 |
|
$ |
1,520.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of sales |
|
860.8 |
|
750.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
609.6 |
|
565.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Special (gains) and charges |
|
30.1 |
|
0.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income |
|
198.3 |
|
204.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense, net |
|
13.1 |
|
15.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income before income taxes |
|
185.2 |
|
189.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
59.0 |
|
59.8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
|
126.2 |
|
129.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
0.3 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income attributable to Ecolab |
|
$ |
125.9 |
|
$ |
129.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.1750 |
|
$ |
0.1550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
231.6 |
|
233.4 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
236.1 |
|
237.4 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30 |
| ||||
(millions, except per share) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,217.1 |
|
$ |
2,952.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of sales (including special charges of $0.8 in 2011) |
|
1,631.2 |
|
1,466.7 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
1,191.2 |
|
1,123.4 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Special (gains) and charges |
|
44.7 |
|
4.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income |
|
350.0 |
|
358.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense, net |
|
26.6 |
|
30.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income before income taxes |
|
323.4 |
|
328.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for income taxes |
|
103.4 |
|
102.9 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
|
220.0 |
|
225.2 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
0.5 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income attributable to Ecolab |
|
$ |
219.5 |
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.3500 |
|
$ |
0.3100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
231.8 |
|
234.4 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
236.2 |
|
238.1 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
| ||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
$ |
242.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
1,106.7 |
|
999.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Inventories |
|
495.5 |
|
447.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
92.8 |
|
78.9 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other current assets |
|
136.0 |
|
101.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total current assets |
|
1,994.2 |
|
1,869.9 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,212.7 |
|
1,148.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Goodwill |
|
1,503.3 |
|
1,329.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
429.8 |
|
282.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
267.4 |
|
242.2 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,407.4 |
|
$ |
4,872.2 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
(Continued)
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (continued)
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
| ||
(millions, except shares and per share) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
$ |
189.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
400.5 |
|
349.3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Compensation and benefits |
|
271.3 |
|
308.1 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income taxes |
|
36.9 |
|
36.7 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
527.4 |
|
441.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
1,639.6 |
|
1,324.8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
703.3 |
|
656.4 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Postretirement health care and pension benefits |
|
494.4 |
|
565.8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
227.7 |
|
192.2 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equity (a) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock |
|
334.9 |
|
333.1 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,388.5 |
|
1,310.2 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
3,417.5 |
|
3,279.1 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(159.5 |
) |
(271.9 |
) | ||
Treasury stock |
|
(2,643.2 |
) |
(2,521.3 |
) | ||
Total Ecolab shareholders equity |
|
2,338.2 |
|
2,129.2 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
4.2 |
|
3.8 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
2,342.4 |
|
2,133.0 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
5,407.4 |
|
$ |
4,872.2 |
|
(a) Common stock, 400 million shares authorized, $1.00 par value per share, 231.9 million shares outstanding at June 30, 2011, 232.5 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2010. Shares outstanding are net of treasury stock.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30 |
| ||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
220.0 |
|
$ |
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interest to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
187.9 |
|
178.0 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
7.3 |
|
(0.8 |
) | ||
Share-based compensation expense |
|
21.0 |
|
14.2 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
(7.8 |
) |
(6.9 |
) | ||
Pension and postretirement plan contributions |
|
(123.0 |
) |
(12.7 |
) | ||
Pension and postretirement plan expense |
|
40.1 |
|
44.7 |
| ||
Restructuring, net of cash paid |
|
36.3 |
|
|
| ||
Other, net |
|
4.0 |
|
7.5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
(34.3 |
) |
(26.8 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(16.8 |
) |
12.3 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
(26.1 |
) |
(7.3 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
34.4 |
|
(9.4 |
) | ||
Other liabilities |
|
(40.9 |
) |
(53.0 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
302.1 |
|
365.0 |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
(Continued)
ECOLAB INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30 |
| ||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(145.8 |
) |
$ |
(125.4 |
) |
Capitalized software expenditures |
|
(11.9 |
) |
(21.1 |
) | ||
Property and other assets sold |
|
2.5 |
|
1.4 |
| ||
Businesses acquired and investments in affiliates, net of cash acquired |
|
(281.1 |
) |
(0.7 |
) | ||
Sale of business |
|
|
|
10.0 |
| ||
Deposit into indemnification escrow |
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
| ||
Receipt from indemnification escrow |
|
|
|
0.9 |
| ||
Cash used for investing activities |
|
(464.4 |
) |
(134.9 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net issuances (repayments) of commercial paper and notes payable |
|
362.3 |
|
73.2 |
| ||
Long-term debt repayments |
|
(153.8 |
) |
(3.3 |
) | ||
Reacquired shares |
|
(122.2 |
) |
(202.0 |
) | ||
Cash dividends on common stock |
|
(81.2 |
) |
(73.4 |
) | ||
Exercise of employee stock options |
|
50.7 |
|
34.8 |
| ||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
7.8 |
|
6.9 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
| ||
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
63.5 |
|
(163.8 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
19.7 |
|
(18.6 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(79.1 |
) |
47.7 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
242.3 |
|
73.6 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
$ |
121.3 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial information.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Consolidated Financial Information
The unaudited consolidated financial information for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Ecolab Inc. (the company) for the interim periods presented. The financial results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The unaudited consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto incorporated in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
With respect to the unaudited financial information of the company for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included in this Form 10-Q, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reported that they have applied limited procedures in accordance with professional standards for a review of such information. However, their separate report dated August 4, 2011 appearing herein states that they did not audit and they do not express an opinion on that unaudited financial information. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on their report on such information should be restricted in light of the limited nature of the review procedures applied. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act), for their report on the unaudited financial information because that report is not a report or a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
2. Special (Gains) and Charges
Special (gains) and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income include the following:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Special (gains) and charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restructuring charges |
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
| ||||
Business structure and optimization |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.2 |
| ||||
Acquisition integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
| ||||
Venezuela currency devaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
| ||||
Business write-downs and closure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) | ||||
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
30.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
44.7 |
|
4.1 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total special (gains) and charges |
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Special (Gains) and Charges (Continued)
For segment reporting purposes, special gains and charges are included in the Corporate segment, which is consistent with the companys internal management reporting.
Restructuring Charges
Following the recent implementation of new business systems in Europe, in February 2011, the company commenced a comprehensive plan to substantially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its European business, sharpen its competitiveness and accelerate its growth and profitability. Additionally, restructuring will be undertaken outside of Europe, the costs of which are not expected to be significant (collectively, the 2011 Restructuring Plan). Through the 2011 Restructuring Plan, approximately 900 positions are expected to be eliminated.
The company expects to incur pretax restructuring charges of approximately $150 million ($125 million after tax) through 2013, as the 2011 Restructuring Plan continues to roll out. Approximately $50 million to $70 million ($40 million to $60 million after tax) of those charges are expected to occur in 2011. The company anticipates that approximately $125 million of the pre-tax charge will represent cash expenditures. The remaining $25 million of the pre-tax charges represent estimated asset disposals.
As a result of restructuring activities, the company recorded restructuring charges of $29.8 million ($25.2 million after tax) or $0.11 per diluted share and $41.0 million ($34.2 million after tax) or $0.15 per diluted share, during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
Restructuring charges and subsequent reductions for the first six months of 2011 related to the 2011 Restructuring Plan include the following:
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Termination |
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(millions) |
|
Costs |
|
Disposals |
|
Other |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
2011 Restructuring Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Recorded expense and accrual |
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
Cash payments |
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
(4.7 |
) | ||||
Non-cash charges |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restructuring liability, June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
$ |
36.6 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Special (Gains) and Charges (Continued)
Restructuring charges have been included as a component of both cost of sales and special gains and charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included as a component of cost of sales include manufacturing related severance. Restructuring liabilities have been classified as a component of other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Employee termination costs include personnel reductions and related costs for severance, benefits and outplacement services. Asset disposals include leasehold improvement write-downs. Other charges include lease terminations.
As previously disclosed, in 2009, the company completed restructuring and other cost-saving actions in order to streamline operations and improve efficiency and effectiveness (the 2009 Restructuring Plan). The 2009 Restructuring Plan was finalized and all actions, except for certain cash payments, were completed as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining liability related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan was $2.8 million. A minimal amount remains as a liability related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan as of June 30, 2011.
Non-restructuring Special (Gains) and Charges
Special gains and charges in 2011 include acquisition integration costs incurred to optimize the Cleantec business structure. Further details related to the Cleantec acquisition are included in Note 7.
Beginning in 2010, Venezuela was designated hyper-inflationary and as such all foreign currency fluctuations are recorded in income. On January 8, 2010 the Venezuelan government devalued its currency, the Bolivar Fuerte. As a result of the devaluation, the company recorded a charge in the first quarter of 2010 due to the remeasurement of the local balance sheet using the official rate of exchange for the Bolivar Fuerte.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. Selected Balance Sheet Information
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
| ||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
1,155.8 |
|
$ |
1,044.5 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
(49.1 |
) |
(44.9 |
) | ||
Total |
|
$ |
1,106.7 |
|
$ |
999.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
281.9 |
|
$ |
254.2 |
|
Raw materials and parts |
|
235.6 |
|
216.1 |
| ||
Inventories at FIFO cost |
|
517.5 |
|
470.3 |
| ||
Excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost |
|
(22.0 |
) |
(22.7 |
) | ||
Total |
|
$ |
495.5 |
|
$ |
447.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land |
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
305.6 |
|
279.9 |
| ||
Leasehold improvements |
|
77.9 |
|
75.9 |
| ||
Machinery and equipment |
|
732.9 |
|
699.1 |
| ||
Merchandising equipment |
|
1,532.2 |
|
1,419.2 |
| ||
Capitalized software |
|
339.0 |
|
321.2 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
56.7 |
|
48.9 |
| ||
|
|
3,080.1 |
|
2,872.6 |
| ||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(1,867.4 |
) |
(1,724.3 |
) | ||
Total |
|
$ |
1,212.7 |
|
$ |
1,148.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other intangible assets, gross |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
440.3 |
|
$ |
276.0 |
|
Trademarks |
|
122.4 |
|
111.3 |
| ||
Patents |
|
81.2 |
|
79.0 |
| ||
Customer lists |
|
5.6 |
|
5.6 |
| ||
Other intangibles |
|
82.5 |
|
73.3 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
732.0 |
|
$ |
545.2 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
(187.1 |
) |
$ |
(159.5 |
) |
Trademarks |
|
(45.2 |
) |
(41.0 |
) | ||
Patents |
|
(31.3 |
) |
(28.2 |
) | ||
Customer lists |
|
(5.6 |
) |
(5.5 |
) | ||
Other intangibles |
|
(33.0 |
) |
(28.5 |
) | ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
429.8 |
|
$ |
282.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
106.4 |
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
Pension |
|
1.4 |
|
1.5 |
| ||
Other |
|
159.6 |
|
128.7 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
267.4 |
|
$ |
242.2 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. Selected Balance Sheet Information (Continued)
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
| ||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
361.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
Notes payable |
|
34.7 |
|
32.4 |
| ||
Long-term debt, current maturities |
|
7.8 |
|
156.8 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
403.5 |
|
$ |
189.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Discounts and rebates |
|
$ |
236.3 |
|
$ |
220.7 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
40.6 |
|
40.7 |
| ||
Interest payable |
|
14.6 |
|
9.3 |
| ||
Taxes payable, other than income |
|
48.8 |
|
49.2 |
| ||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
16.5 |
|
5.1 |
| ||
Restructuring |
|
36.6 |
|
2.8 |
| ||
Other |
|
134.0 |
|
113.7 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
527.4 |
|
$ |
441.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
$ |
65.3 |
|
Income taxes payable - non-current |
|
37.6 |
|
38.1 |
| ||
Other |
|
118.6 |
|
88.8 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
227.7 |
|
$ |
192.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax |
|
$ |
(12.8 |
) |
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit expense, net of tax |
|
(385.9 |
) |
(387.4 |
) | ||
Cumulative translation, net of tax |
|
239.2 |
|
118.8 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
(159.5 |
) |
$ |
(271.9 |
) |
4. Interest
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
Interest income |
|
(1.7 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(3.2 |
) |
(2.4 |
) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
$ |
26.6 |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, commercial paper, notes payable, foreign currency forward contracts interest rate swap contracts and long-term debt. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, commercial paper and notes payable approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The carrying values of foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap contracts are at fair value, which is determined based on foreign currency exchange rates and current interest rates, respectively, as of the balance sheet date (level 2 - significant other observable inputs).
The carrying amount and the estimated fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, held by the company were:
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
(millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Long-term debt (including current maturities) |
|
$ |
711.1 |
|
$ |
766.0 |
|
$ |
813.2 |
|
$ |
850.6 |
|
The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments. The company has concluded that it does not have any level 3 financial instruments (unobservable inputs) measured using the companys own assumptions of fair market value.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging
The company uses foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and foreign currency debt to manage risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and net investments in foreign operations. The company records all derivatives as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivative qualifies and is designated as a hedge. The effective portion of changes in fair value of hedges are initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Amounts recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The company evaluates hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis. If a derivative is no longer expected to be effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. Hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded in earnings.
The company does not hold derivative financial instruments of a speculative nature. The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance of counterparties for foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. The company monitors its exposure to credit risk by using credit approvals and credit limits and by selecting major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties. The company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
The company utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted foreign currency transactions, including: sales, inventory purchases, and intercompany royalty and management fee payments. These forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portions of the changes in fair value of these contracts are recorded in AOCI until the hedged items affect earnings, at which time the gain or loss is reclassified into the same line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income as the underlying exposure being hedged. All hedged transactions are forecasted to occur within the next twelve months.
The company occasionally enters into interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate exposures. During the first six months of 2011, the company entered into four forward starting swap agreements in anticipation of a long-term debt issuance. The interest rate swap agreements were designated and effective as a cash flow hedge of the expected interest payments related to the anticipated debt issuance. The company expects to complete the long-term debt issuance by the end of 2011. In 2006, the company entered into and subsequently closed two forward starting swap contracts related to the issuance of its senior euro notes. The settlement payment was recorded in AOCI and is recognized in earnings as part of interest expense over the remaining life of the notes as the forecasted interest transactions occur.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
The company also uses foreign currency forward contracts to offset its exposure to the change in value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily receivables and payables. Although the contracts are effective economic hedges, they are not designated as accounting hedges. Therefore, changes in the value of these derivatives are recognized immediately in earnings, thereby offsetting the current earnings effect of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of the companys outstanding derivatives. The amounts are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the balance sheet.
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
| ||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
9.6 |
|
1.3 |
|
2.6 |
|
1.9 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
$ |
16.5 |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
The company had foreign currency forward exchange contracts with notional values that totaled approximately $523 million at June 30, 2011, and $433 million at December 31, 2010.
The company had interest rate swap contracts with notional values that totaled $250 million at June 30, 2011.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
The impact on AOCI and earnings from derivative contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) recognized into AOCI (effective portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
AOCI (equity) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
$ |
1.1 |
|
$ |
(5.6 |
) |
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
AOCI (equity) |
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income (effective portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
(3.0 |
) | ||||
|
|
SG&A |
|
(0.6 |
) |
0.2 |
|
(0.9 |
) |
0.5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(3.5 |
) |
(2.4 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions (Continued)
The impact on earnings from derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain (loss) recognized in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
SG&A |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
(2.8 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
The amounts recognized in earnings above offset the earnings impact of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.
Net Investment Hedge
The company designates its euro 300 million ($432 million as of June 30, 2011) senior notes and related accrued interest as a hedge of existing foreign currency exposures related to net investments the company has in certain Euro functional subsidiaries. Accordingly, the transaction gains and losses on the euronotes which are designated and effective as hedges of the companys net investments have been included as a component of the cumulative translation adjustment account. Total transaction gains and losses related to the euronotes charged to shareholders equity were as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Transaction gains (losses), net of tax |
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
$ |
24.7 |
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
$ |
50.2 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Comprehensive Income
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
126.2 |
|
$ |
129.5 |
|
$ |
220.0 |
|
$ |
225.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
51.7 |
|
(84.0 |
) |
120.4 |
|
(174.3 |
) | ||||
Derivative instruments |
|
(8.2 |
) |
1.5 |
|
(9.5 |
) |
2.6 |
| ||||
Pension and postretirement benefits |
|
2.2 |
|
9.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
24.0 |
| ||||
Total |
|
45.7 |
|
(72.9 |
) |
112.4 |
|
(147.7 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total comprehensive income, including noncontrolling interest |
|
171.9 |
|
56.6 |
|
332.4 |
|
77.5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
(0.6 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Ecolab |
|
$ |
171.7 |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
$ |
332.0 |
|
$ |
78.1 |
|
7. Business Acquisitions and Dispositions
In December 2010, subsequent to the companys fiscal year end for international operations, the company completed the purchase of the assets of the Cleantec business of Campbell Brothers Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Cleantec is a developer, manufacturer and marketer of cleaning and hygiene products principally within the Australian food and beverage processing, foodservice, hospitality and textile care markets. The total purchase price was approximately $43 million, of which $2 million remains payable and was placed in an escrow for indemnification purposes. The business, which has annual sales of approximately $55 million, became part of the companys International segment during the first quarter of 2011.
In March 2011, the company closed on the purchase of the assets of O.R. Solutions, Inc., a privately-held developer and marketer of surgical fluid warming and cooling systems in the U.S. The total purchase price was approximately $260 million, of which $26 million remains payable and was placed in an escrow for indemnification purposes related to general representations and warranties. The business, which has annual sales of approximately $55 million, became part of the companys U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing segment during the first quarter of 2011.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. Business Acquisitions and Dispositions (Continued)
In July 2011, the company entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Nalco Holding Company (Nalco), under which Nalco will be merged with a subsidiary of the company. Based in Naperville, Illinois, Nalco is the worlds leading water treatment and process improvement company, offering water management sustainability services focused on industrial, energy and institutional market segments. Nalco sales were approximately $4.3 billion in 2010. Subject to the terms of the merger agreement, the company will issue approximately 68.9 million shares of Ecolab stock and pay approximately $1.6 billion in cash to Nalco shareholders. This represents a fully-diluted offer value for Nalcos equity of $5.4 billion and, inclusive of $2.7 billion in Nalco net debt, a total transaction value of $8.1 billion, based on the companys closing stock price on July 19, 2011. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter, subject to customary closing conditions, regulatory clearances, as well as approval of both the companys and Nalcos shareholders.
The weighted average useful life of identifiable intangible assets acquired during 2011 is 14 years.
There were no acquisitions during the first six months of 2010. The company made an earnout payment in the second quarter of 2010 related to a previous acquisition. The company sold a small joint venture in its international segment during the second quarter of 2010. The impact of this divestiture was not material.
Completed acquisitions in 2011 are not material to the companys consolidated financial statements; therefore pro forma financial information is not presented. The aggregate purchase price of acquisitions has been reduced for any cash or cash equivalents acquired with the acquisitions.
Based upon purchase price allocations, the components of the aggregate purchase prices of acquisitions are shown in the table below. The contingent consideration relates to an immaterial acquisition completed during the second quarter of 2011.
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
$ |
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Customer relationships |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
144.7 |
|
|
| ||||
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
| ||||
Patents |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
| ||||
Other intangibles |
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
| ||||
Goodwill |
|
3.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
91.9 |
|
0.7 |
| ||||
Total aggregate purchase price |
|
8.3 |
|
0.7 |
|
313.9 |
|
0.7 |
| ||||
Contingent consideration |
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
| ||||
Liability for indemnification |
|
|
|
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
| ||||
Net cash paid for acquisitions |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
281.1 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. Earnings Attributable to Ecolab Per Common Share
The computations of the basic and diluted earnings attributable to Ecolab per share amounts were as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions, except per share) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to Ecolab |
|
$ |
125.9 |
|
$ |
129.3 |
|
$ |
219.5 |
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
231.6 |
|
233.4 |
|
231.8 |
|
234.4 |
| ||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and awards |
|
4.5 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.4 |
|
3.7 |
| ||||
Diluted |
|
236.1 |
|
237.4 |
|
236.2 |
|
238.1 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share |
|
2.3 |
|
5.0 |
|
2.4 |
|
7.4 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. Pension and Postretirement Plans
The company is not required to make any contributions to its U.S. pension plan and postretirement health care benefits plan for 2011. However, the company made a $100 million voluntary contribution to the U.S. pension plan in the first quarter of 2011.
Certain international pension benefit plans are required to be funded in accordance with local government requirements. The company contributed $23 million to its international pension benefit plans during the first six months of 2011. The company currently estimates that it will contribute approximately $18 million more to the international pension benefit plans during the remainder of 2011.
The components of net periodic pension and postretirement health care benefit costs for the second quarter ended June 30 are as follows:
|
|
U.S. Pension |
|
International |
|
U.S. |
| ||||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
15.3 |
|
15.6 |
|
7.2 |
|
6.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
2.2 |
| ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(24.7 |
) |
(22.5 |
) |
(5.7 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.4 |
) | ||||||
Recognition of net actuarial loss |
|
8.0 |
|
6.2 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) |
|
(1.1 |
) |
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) | ||||||
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
The components of net periodic pension and postretirement health care benefit costs for the six months ended June 30 are as follows:
|
|
U.S. Pension |
|
International |
|
U.S. |
| ||||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligation |
|
30.6 |
|
31.2 |
|
14.0 |
|
12.9 |
|
4.2 |
|
4.4 |
| ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(49.4 |
) |
(45.0 |
) |
(11.2 |
) |
(8.3 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
(0.8 |
) | ||||||
Recognition of net actuarial loss |
|
16.0 |
|
12.4 |
|
2.8 |
|
1.9 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
| ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) |
|
(2.2 |
) |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) | ||||||
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. Operating Segments
The companys twelve operating segments have been aggregated into three reportable segments. Financial information for each of the companys reportable segments is as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cleaning & Sanitizing |
|
$ |
752.4 |
|
$ |
689.3 |
|
$ |
1,433.9 |
|
$ |
1,321.6 |
|
Other Services |
|
116.5 |
|
114.9 |
|
223.7 |
|
219.6 |
| ||||
Total |
|
868.9 |
|
804.2 |
|
1,657.6 |
|
1,541.2 |
| ||||
International |
|
781.1 |
|
728.4 |
|
1,497.3 |
|
1,409.6 |
| ||||
Subtotal at fixed currency |
|
1,650.0 |
|
1,532.6 |
|
3,154.9 |
|
2,950.8 |
| ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
48.8 |
|
(12.4 |
) |
62.2 |
|
1.5 |
| ||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
1,698.8 |
|
$ |
1,520.2 |
|
$ |
3,217.1 |
|
$ |
2,952.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cleaning & Sanitizing |
|
$ |
143.0 |
|
$ |
138.6 |
|
$ |
254.9 |
|
$ |
252.0 |
|
Other Services |
|
15.9 |
|
18.6 |
|
30.6 |
|
33.2 |
| ||||
Total |
|
158.9 |
|
157.2 |
|
285.5 |
|
285.2 |
| ||||
International |
|
71.1 |
|
56.5 |
|
116.1 |
|
96.7 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Corporate |
|
(35.7 |
) |
(6.9 |
) |
(56.3 |
) |
(18.8 |
) | ||||
Subtotal at fixed currency |
|
194.3 |
|
206.8 |
|
345.3 |
|
363.1 |
| ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
4.0 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
4.7 |
|
(5.0 |
) | ||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
198.3 |
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
The International amounts included above are based on translation into U.S. dollars at the fixed currency exchange rates used by management for 2011.
Consistent with the companys internal management reporting, the Corporate segment includes special gains and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The Corporate segment also includes investments in the development of business systems and other corporate investments the company is making as part of ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and returns.
Total service revenue for the U.S. Other Services and International segments, at public exchange rates are as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. Other Services |
|
$ |
98.3 |
|
$ |
97.8 |
|
$ |
187.4 |
|
$ |
185.6 |
|
International |
|
52.8 |
|
44.9 |
|
100.2 |
|
89.3 |
| ||||
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the second quarter. The companys reporting units are its operating segments. If circumstances change significantly, the company would also test a reporting unit for impairment during interim periods between its annual tests. During the second quarter ended June 30, 2011, the company completed its annual test for goodwill impairment. Based on this testing, no adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill was necessary. There has been no impairment of goodwill since the adoption of FASB guidance for goodwill and other intangibles on January 1, 2002.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for each of the companys reportable segments during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
Cleaning & |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
(millions) |
|
Sanitizing |
|
Services |
|
Total |
|
Intl |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Beginning Goodwill as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
454.4 |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
$ |
504.9 |
|
$ |
824.4 |
|
$ |
1,329.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Business acquisitions (a) |
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
3.3 |
|
91.9 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
82.1 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Ending goodwill as of as of June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
543.0 |
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
$ |
593.5 |
|
$ |
909.8 |
|
$ |
1,503.3 |
|
(a) For 2011, goodwill related to businesses acquired of $88.6 million is expected to be tax deductible.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Continued)
The companys other intangible assets primarily include customer relationships, trademarks, patents and other technology. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Total amortization expense related to other intangible assets during the second quarter ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $13.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively. Total amortization expense related to other intangible assets during the first six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $25.3 million and $20.2 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, future estimated amortization expense related to amortizable other identifiable intangible assets will be:
(millions) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
2011 (Remainder: six-month period) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
2012 |
|
54 |
| |
2013 |
|
53 |
| |
2014 |
|
42 |
| |
2015 |
|
37 |
| |
12. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance on fair value measurements. The updated guidance will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a material impact on the companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued a final standard on the presentation of comprehensive income. Under the newly issued guidance, net income and comprehensive income may only be presented either as one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption and will include the required disclosures upon adoption in the first quarter of 2012.
No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective has had or is expected to have a material impact on the companys consolidated financial statements.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
The company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to, among other things, workers compensation, general liability, automobile claims, health insurance claims, lawsuits, environmental matters and income taxes. The company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments.
The company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. The company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable, or both, if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred.
ECOLAB INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
The company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits, claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. These include antitrust, patent infringement, product liability and wage hour lawsuits, as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites, such as Superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities. Because litigation is inherently uncertain, and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur, there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of presently recorded liabilities. A future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the companys results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded. The company currently believes that such future charge, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the companys consolidated financial position.
The company is a defendant in three wage hour lawsuits claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act or a similar state law. Two of the suits seek certification of a state class of certain Institutional division associates. One of the suits seeks certification of a national class of certain independent contractors in the companys U.S. Other Services segment, as well as the granting of certain employment benefits. None of the suits have been certified for class-action status. The suits are still in their initial phases. The company believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss related to these lawsuits.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Ecolab Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Ecolab Inc. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and equity, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 25, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2010, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 4, 2011
ECOLAB INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is useful in understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition. The discussion should be read in conjunction with both the unaudited consolidated financial information and related notes included in this Form 10-Q, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. This discussion contains various Non-GAAP Financial Measures and also contains various Forward-Looking Statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We refer readers to the statements entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Forward-Looking Statements located at the end of Part I of this report.
Overview of the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
We reported strong adjusted earnings per share growth in the second quarter. Sales increased, led by good growth from our U.S. Cleaning and Sanitizing segment, Asia Pacific and Latin America. Increased sales and improving international profits more than offset higher delivered product costs.
Both 2011 and 2010 results of operations included special gains and charges, as well as discrete tax items which impact the year over year comparisons.
Sales Performance
· Consolidated net sales increased 12% to $1.7 billion. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales increased 9%. Net sales were favorably impacted by foreign currency exchange during the quarter. When measured in fixed rates of currency exchange, net sales grew 8%.
· U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing sales rose 9% to $752 million. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales rose 6%. Results were led by 10% sales growth for Food & Beverage, 7% growth for Kay, 4% growth for Institutional and 27% growth for Healthcare. Excluding acquisitions, Healthcare sales were flat compared to the prior year.
· U.S. Other Services sales increased 1% to $116 million. GCS sales grew 7% while Pest Elimination sales were comparable to the prior year.
· International sales, when measured in fixed rates of currency exchange, increased 7% to $781 million in the second quarter. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, fixed currency sales increased 5%. Asia Pacific reported 16% sales growth for the quarter (5% growth excluding impact from acquisitions) while Latin America reported sales growth of 14%. Canada sales rose 7% for the quarter and Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA) sales increased by 3%. When measured at public currency rates, International sales increased 16%.
Financial Performance
· Operating income decreased 3% to $198 million. Excluding the impact of special gains and charges from both years, adjusted operating income increased 11% compared to the second quarter of 2010.
· Net income attributable to Ecolab decreased 3% to $126 million. Excluding the impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items, adjusted net income attributable to Ecolab increased 14%.
· Reported diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab of $0.53 decreased 2% compared to the second quarter of 2010. Excluding the impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items, adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab increased 14% to $0.64 for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $0.56 in the second quarter of 2010.
Financial Performance (Continued)
· Our reported effective income tax rate was 31.9% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 31.6% for the second quarter of 2010. Excluding the tax rate impact of special gains and charges, and discrete tax items, our adjusted effective income tax rate was 30.2% and 30.4% for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Reconciliations of reported and adjusted amounts are provided on pages 30-32 of this report.
Results of Operations - Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011 were $1.7 billion, an increase of 12% compared to last year. For the first six months of 2011, net sales increased 9% to $3.2 billion. When measured in fixed rates of currency exchange, sales increased 8% for the second quarter of 2011 and 7% for the first six months of 2011. The components of the sales increase are shown below.
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||
(percent) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Volume |
|
4 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
|
Price changes |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Acquisitions & divestitures |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Fixed currency sales increase |
|
8 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange |
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total net sales increase |
|
12 |
% |
|
9 |
% |
|
Gross Profit Margin
The gross profit margin (gross margin)(defined as the difference between net sales less cost of sales divided by net sales) was 49.3% and 50.7% for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our gross margin for the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was 49.3% and 50.3%, respectively. The gross margin decrease resulted from higher delivered product costs, which more than offset the impact of volume and pricing gains.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of consolidated net sales were 35.9% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 37.2% in 2010. For the first six month periods, selling, general and administrative expenses were 37.0% of sales in 2011 and 38.1% of sales in 2010. Leverage from sales gains in 2011 more than offset cost increases.
Special (Gains) and Charges
Special gains and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income included the following items:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Special (gains) and charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restructuring charges |
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
| ||||
Business structure and optimization |
|
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.2 |
| ||||
Acquisition integration costs |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
| ||||
Venezuela currency devaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
| ||||
Business write-downs and closure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) | ||||
Other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
30.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
44.7 |
|
4.1 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total special (gains) and charges |
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Following the recent implementation of new business systems in Europe, in February 2011, we commenced a comprehensive plan to substantially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our European business, sharpen its competitiveness and accelerate its growth and profitability. Additionally, restructuring will be undertaken outside of Europe, the costs of which are not expected to be significant. As a result of restructuring activities, we recorded restructuring charges of $29.8 million ($25.2 million after tax) or $0.11 per diluted share and $41.0 million ($34.2 million after tax) or $0.15 per diluted share, during the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Restructuring charges have been included as a component of both cost of sales and special gains and charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
We expect to incur pretax restructuring charges of approximately $150 million ($125 million after tax) through 2013, as the restructuring plan continues to roll out. These actions are expected to result in approximately $120 million ($100 million after tax) in annualized cost savings when fully realized, with approximately $4 million to $6 million ($3 million to $5 million after tax) realized in 2011. Approximately $50 million to $70 million ($40 million to $60 million after tax) of these charges are expected to occur in 2011. We anticipate that approximately $125 million of the pre-tax charge will represent cash expenditures. The remaining $25 million of the pre-tax charges represent estimated asset disposals.
Further details related to our restructuring charges and non-restructuring special gains and charges are included in Note 2.
Operating Income
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
% |
|
June 30 |
|
% |
| ||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Reported GAAP operating income |
|
$ |
198.3 |
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
(3) |
% |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
(2 |
)% |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Special gains and charges |
|
30.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income |
|
228.4 |
|
204.9 |
|
11 |
|
395.5 |
|
362.2 |
|
9 |
|
| |||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
(4.0 |
) |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
5.0 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-GAAP adjusted fixed currency operating income |
|
$ |
224.4 |
|
$ |
207.4 |
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
390.8 |
|
$ |
367.2 |
|
6 |
% |
|
Our reported operating income decrease of 3% and 2% for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, was impacted by the year over year comparison of special gains and charges.
On an adjusted basis, excluding special gains and charges, operating income increased 11% and 9% in the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively. Foreign currency had a favorable impact on both second quarter and year to date adjusted operating income. Adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 8% in the second quarter and 6% for the first six months of 2011. The adjusted operating income increase was driven by sales volume gains, pricing and efficiencies, which more than offset increased delivered product costs and other costs.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense totaled $13.1 million in the second quarter of 2011, compared with $15.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. Net interest expense for the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was $26.6 million and $30.0 million, respectively. The decline in our net interest expense was due to repayment of our $150 million 6.875% notes in February 2011 and higher interest income, partially offset by higher interest expense related to hedging activities.
Provision for Income Taxes
The following table provides a summary of our reported tax rate:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
| ||||
(percent) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported GAAP tax rate |
|
31.9 |
% |
31.6 |
% |
32.0 |
% |
31.4 |
% |
Tax rate impact of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special gains and charges |
|
(2.4 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(1.9 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
Discrete tax items |
|
0.7 |
|
(1.1 |
) |
0.1 |
|
(0.4 |
) |
Non-GAAP adjusted tax rate |
|
30.2 |
% |
30.4 |
% |
30.2 |
% |
30.5 |
% |
The reported tax rate for the second quarter and first six months of 2011 and 2010 included the tax impact of special gains and charges and discrete tax items which combined, increased our reported tax rate. The decrease in the 2011 Non-GAAP adjusted effective tax rate compared to 2010 was due primarily to increased tax benefits from international operations and inclusion of the R&D credit, which was not extended for 2010 until the fourth quarter of 2010.
The second quarter 2011 reported tax rate was impacted by $6.0 million of reduced tax expense, including $4.5 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges and $1.5 million of discrete tax net benefits. For the first six months of 2011, the reported tax rate was impacted by $8.0 million of reduced tax expense, including $7.6 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges and $0.4 million of discrete tax net benefits. Second quarter 2011 discrete tax benefits primarily include the impact of recognizing settlements and adjustments related to prior year tax returns. First quarter 2011 discrete tax expense primarily includes recognizing the impact of a change in our blended state tax rate, partially offset by a prior year state refund claim.
The second quarter 2010 reported tax rate was impacted by $2.1 million of additional tax expense, which was primarily driven by discrete tax net expense, with minimal impact from special gains and charges. For the first six months of 2010, the reported tax rate was impacted by $1.6 million of additional tax expense, including $0.3 million of net tax expense on special gains and charges and $1.3 million of discrete tax net expense. The discrete tax items for the second quarter of 2010 primarily include a $2 million charge for the impact of international tax costs from optimizing our business structure. Discrete tax items for the first quarter of 2010 included a $5 million charge due to the passage of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Law which changes the tax deductibility related to federal subsidies and resulted in a reduction of the value of the companys deferred tax assets related to the subsidies. This charge was offset by a $6 million tax benefit from the settlement of an international tax audit.
Net Income Attributable to Ecolab
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
% |
|
June 30 |
|
% |
| ||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Reported GAAP net income |
|
$ |
125.9 |
|
$ |
129.3 |
|
(3)% |
|
$ |
219.5 |
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
(2)% |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Special gains and charges |
|
25.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
4.4 |
|
|
| ||||
Discrete tax expense (benefits) |
|
(1.5 |
) |
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
1.3 |
|
|
| ||||
Non-GAAP adjusted net income |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
14% |
|
$ |
257.0 |
|
$ |
230.5 |
|
11% |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share Attributable to Ecolab (EPS)
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
% |
|
June 30 |
|
% |
| ||||||||||
(dollars) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Reported GAAP diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
(1 |
)% |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Special gains and charges |
|
0.11 |
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Discrete tax expense (benefits) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Non-GAAP adjusted diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
12 |
% |
|
Note: Per share amounts in table above do not necessarily sum due to changes in shares outstanding and rounding.
Currency translation had a favorable impact of approximately $4.6 million, net of tax, or $0.02 per share on diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2010. Currency translation had a favorable impact of approximately $7.0 million, net of tax, or $0.03 per share on diluted earnings per share for the first six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
Segment Results
Sales for each of our reportable segments were as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
% |
|
June 30 |
|
% |
| ||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cleaning & Sanitizing |
|
$ |
752.4 |
|
$ |
689.3 |
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,433.9 |
|
$ |
1,321.6 |
|
8 |
% |
|
Other Services |
|
116.5 |
|
114.9 |
|
1 |
|
|
223.7 |
|
219.6 |
|
2 |
|
| ||||
Total |
|
868.9 |
|
804.2 |
|
8 |
|
|
1,657.6 |
|
1,541.2 |
|
8 |
|
| ||||
International |
|
781.1 |
|
728.4 |
|
7 |
|
|
1,497.3 |
|
1,409.6 |
|
6 |
|
| ||||
Subtotal at fixed currency |
|
1,650.0 |
|
1,532.6 |
|
8 |
|
|
3,154.9 |
|
2,950.8 |
|
7 |
|
| ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
48.8 |
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
| ||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
1,698.8 |
|
$ |
1,520.2 |
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
3,217.1 |
|
$ |
2,952.3 |
|
9 |
% |
|
U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing sales increased 9% in the second quarter and 8% for the first six months of 2011. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales increased 6% for both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Sales for our larger U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing businesses were as follows:
· Institutional - Sales grew 4% for the both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. New account gains, sales initiatives and effective product and service programs continued to drive results. We experienced mixed market trends in the second quarter, with increased demand from our lodging customers, while overall foot traffic at our foodservice customers was soft.
· Food & Beverage - Sales in the second quarter of 2011 increased 10%, while sales for the first six months of 2011 increased 8%. Sales increased in the dairy and food market segments, led by corporate account wins, pricing and product penetration. Second quarter sales also benefited from a project sale through our Ecovation business.
· Kay - Sales increased 7% and 9% for the second quarter of 2011 and first six months of 2011, respectively. The sales increase was led by strong growth from our food retail business from both new and existing accounts.
· Healthcare - Sales increased 27% for the second quarter and 23% for the first six months of 2011. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales were flat for the second quarter and increased 4% for the first six months of 2011. Sales of equipment and patient drapes, hand hygiene, and surgical instrument cleaning products led the sales increase through the first six months of 2011.
Segment Results (Continued)
U.S. Other Services sales increased 1% in the second quarter of 2011 and 2% for the first six months of 2011. Sales for our U.S. Other Services businesses were as follows:
· Pest Elimination - Sales were flat to the prior year periods both for the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Gains in the hospitality, food & beverage plant, healthcare and grocery segments were offset by slow conditions in other major segments. Contract sales increased marginally, offset by a small decrease in non-contract sales.
· GCS Service - Sales grew 7% for the both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Service and installed parts sales increased, benefiting from pricing gains and new accounts. Direct parts sales showed improvement in the second quarter compared to the prior year.
We evaluate the performance of our International operations based on fixed rates of foreign currency exchange. Fixed currency sales for our International operations increased 7% and 6% for the second quarter and six months of 2011, respectively. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, fixed currency sales increased 5% for both the second quarter and six months ended 2011. When measured at public currency rates, International sales increased 16% for the second quarter of 2011 and 11% for the first six months of 2011. Fixed currency sales changes for our International regions were as follows:
· EMEA - Sales increased 3% for the second quarter and 2% for the first six months of 2011. For the second quarter, sales growth in MEA, Germany and the U.K. was partially offset by lower sales in France and Italy. From a divisional perspective, Europes Food & Beverage sales rose during the quarter, driven by market share gains through corporate accounts. Healthcare and Pest Elimination sales also increased during the second quarter. Institutional sales were flat for second quarter and Textile Care sales were slightly lower compared to the prior year.
· Asia Pacific - Sales increased 16% for the both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, sales increased 5% and 6% for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively. Sales growth was driven primarily by increases in China and Australia. From a divisional perspective, Institutional sales remained strong as occupancy levels showed improvement. Food & Beverage also continued to report strong sales growth, benefiting from increased product penetration and account gains.
· Latin America - We continue to see strong sales growth in Latin America, as sales increased 14% for the second quarter and 13% for the first six months of 2011. At a country level, Brazil, Chile and Mexico all showed strong sales gains. Our Institutional, Food & Beverage and Pest Elimination businesses all reported double-digit increases in sales.
· Canada - Sales increased 7% for the second quarter and 2% for the first six months of 2011. For the quarter, solid growth in both Institutional and Food & Beverage led the sales increase. Institutional sales were comparable to the prior year for the first six months of 2011.
Segment Results (Continued)
Operating income for each of our reportable segments is as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
June 30 |
|
% |
|
June 30 |
|
% |
| ||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cleaning & Sanitizing |
|
$ |
143.0 |
|
$ |
138.6 |
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
254.9 |
|
$ |
252.0 |
|
1 |
% |
|
Other Services |
|
15.9 |
|
18.6 |
|
(15 |
) |
|
30.6 |
|
33.2 |
|
(8 |
) |
| ||||
Total |
|
158.9 |
|
157.2 |
|
1 |
|
|
285.5 |
|
285.2 |
|
|
|
| ||||
International |
|
71.1 |
|
56.5 |
|
26 |
|
|
116.1 |
|
96.7 |
|
20 |
|
| ||||
Corporate |
|
(35.7 |
) |
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
(56.3 |
) |
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
| ||||
Subtotal at fixed currency |
|
194.3 |
|
206.8 |
|
(6 |
) |
|
345.3 |
|
363.1 |
|
(5 |
) |
| ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
4.0 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
| ||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
198.3 |
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
(2 |
)% |
|
U.S. Cleaning & Sanitizing operating income increased 3% for the second quarter of 2011 and 1% for the first six months of 2011. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, operating income decreased 4% for both the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Increases in delivered product costs more than offset volume and pricing gains.
U.S. Other Services operating income decreased 15% and 8% for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively. Increases in service delivery costs more than offset sales gains and cost savings actions to drive the operating income decline.
International segment operating income at fixed currency rates increased 26% for the second quarter of 2011 and 20% for the first six months of 2011. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, fixed currency operating income increased 24% and 19% for the second quarter of 2011 and first six months of 2011, respectively. Operating income growth was driven by volume and pricing gains, which more than offset higher delivered product and other costs. When measured at public currency rates, International operating income increased 40% and 32% for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively.
Consistent with our internal management reporting, the Corporate segment includes special gains and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Items included in special gains and charges are shown in the table on page 29. The Corporate segment also includes investments in the development of business systems and other corporate investments we are making as part of our ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and returns.
Financial Position and Liquidity
Total assets were $5.4 billion as of June 30, 2011, compared to total assets of $4.9 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase is due partially to acquisitions, which added $0.3 billion to total assets. Also driving the increase is the impact of foreign currency exchange rates which increased the value of international assets on our balance sheet when translated into U.S. dollars.
Total debt was $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2011 and $846 million as of December 31, 2010. The ratio of total debt to capitalization (total equity plus total debt) increased to 32% at June 30, 2011 compared to 28% at December 31, 2010. The increases in debt and the debt to capital ratio were due primarily to the O.R Solutions, Inc. acquisition, the $100 million voluntary contribution to our U.S. pension plan and share repurchases. We are in compliance with all of our debt covenants and believe we have sufficient borrowing capacity to meet our foreseeable operating needs.
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $302 million for the first six months of 2011 compared to $365 million in 2010. Operating cash flow in 2011 was negatively impacted by a $100 million voluntary contribution to our U.S. pension plan. We continue to generate strong cash flow from operations which has allowed us to continue to fund our ongoing operations, investments in the business, acquisitions, pension obligations and return cash to shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments.
Cash used for investing activities was $464 million in 2011 compared to $135 million in 2010. Cash paid for acquisitions increased in 2011 due primarily to the acquisitions of the Cleantec business of Campbell Brothers Ltd. and O.R. Solutions, Inc. in the first quarter. There was minimal acquisition activity during the first six months of 2010. See Note 7 for further information on our business acquisition activity. Increases in capital expenditures compared to the prior year were partially offset by a decrease in software investments.
Cash provided by financing activities in 2011 included an increase of $362 million related to net issuances of commercial paper and notes payable. This increase was used to fund acquisition activity, a long-term debt repayment, the voluntary U.S. pension contribution and share repurchases. 2011 included the repurchase of 2.4 million of our common shares for approximately $120 million under our share repurchase program. During the first six months of 2010 we repurchased 4.5 million of our common shares for approximately $200 million.
The schedule of contractual obligations included in the Financial Position and Liquidity section of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 disclosed total notes payable and long-term debt due within one year of $189 million. As of June 30, 2011, the total notes payable and long-term debt due within one year has increased to $404 million. The increase from year end is primarily due to an increase in our outstanding U.S. commercial paper. Our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $48 million as of June 30, 2011 and $66 million as of December 31, 2010. There are specific positions within the 1999 through 2001 examinations that are still open with the IRS. The decrease in the liability balance was due primarily to the settlement of our 2007 through 2008 IRS audit and corresponding adjustments to prior year reserves. We are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, we do not expect significant payments related to these obligations within the next year.
Excluding the impact of the recently announced planned merger with Nalco which will require the issuance of shares, we currently expect to fund all of the cash requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for the next twelve months, including scheduled debt repayments, new investments in the business, dividend payments, possible business acquisitions and pension contributions with cash from operating activities, cash reserves and short-term or long-term borrowings. We expect to fund the cash portion of the planned merger with Nalco by accessing the capital markets through a combination of short-term and long-term debt.
Financial Position and Liquidity (Continued)
As of June 30, 2011, we had $163 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and expect our operating cash flow to remain strong. Additionally, we have a $600 million multi-year credit facility with a diverse portfolio of banks which expires in June 2012. The credit facility supports our $600 million U.S. commercial paper program and our $200 million European commercial paper program. Combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $600 million. As of June 30, 2011, we had $361 million in outstanding U.S. commercial paper, with an average annual interest rate of 0.1%, and no amounts outstanding under our European commercial paper program. Both programs are rated A-1 by Standard & Poors and P-1 by Moodys. As a result of the recently announced planned merger with Nalco, we intend to replace the multi-year credit facility with a larger facility and correspondly upsize our commercial paper program. In light of the additional borrowing needs due to the planned Nalco merger, the ratings agencies are reviewing the ratings of our programs, and both have put us on a negative watch for a potential downgrade.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For information on new accounting pronouncements, see Note 12.
Subsequent Events
On July 19, 2011, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Nalco Holding Company (Nalco), under which Nalco will be merged with a subsidiary of our company. Based in Naperville, Illinois, Nalco is the worlds leading water treatment and process improvement company, offering water management sustainability services focused on industrial, energy and institutional market segments. Nalco delivers significant environmental, social and economic performance benefits to customers through value-added services in water treatment and management, pollution reduction programs, energy conservation, and oil and gas extraction efficiency and sustainability offerings. Nalco sales were approximately $4.3 billion in 2010.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Nalco shareholders will have the option to receive either 0.7005 shares of Ecolab common stock or $38.80 per Nalco share in cash, without interest, subject to proration such that the overall consideration paid to Nalco shareholders will be approximately 70% in Ecolab shares and 30% in cash. Subject to the terms of the merger agreement, we will issue approximately 68.9 million shares of Ecolab stock and pay approximately $1.6 billion in cash to Nalco shareholders. This represents a fully-diluted offer value for Nalcos equity of $5.4 billion and, inclusive of $2.7 billion in Nalco net debt, a total transaction value of $8.1 billion, based on our closing stock price on July 19, 2011, the last stock trading day prior to the announcement of the merger.
The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter, subject to customary closing conditions, regulatory clearance, as well as approval of both our and Nalcos shareholders.
On August 1, 2011, we were served with a purported class action lawsuit, filed in Illinois state court, by a purported Nalco shareholder alleging that the directors of Nalco breached their fiduciary duties in connection with Nalcos decision to enter into the merger agreement, and that Ecolab aided and abetted such breach. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and equitable relief, including an order enjoining consummation of the merger. Ecolab believes that the allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 2, contains financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). These Non-GAAP measures include fixed currency sales and fixed currency operating income, adjusted operating income, adjusted fixed currency operating income, adjusted effective tax rate, adjusted net income attributable to Ecolab and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab. We provide these measures as additional information regarding our operating results. We use these Non-GAAP measures internally to evaluate our performance and in making financial and operational decisions, including with respect to incentive compensation. We believe that our presentation of these measures provides investors with greater transparency with respect to our results of operations and that these measures are useful for period-to-period comparison of results.
We include in special gains and charges items that are unusual in nature, significant in amount and important to an understanding of underlying business performance. In order to better allow investors to compare underlying business performance period-to-period, we provide adjusted operating income, adjusted fixed currency operating income, adjusted net income attributable to Ecolab and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to Ecolab, which exclude special gains and charges and discrete tax items.
The adjusted effective tax rate measure promotes period-to-period comparability of the underlying effective tax rate because the amounts excluded do not necessarily reflect costs associated with historical trends or expected future costs.
We evaluate the performance of our international operations based on fixed currency rates of foreign exchange. Fixed currency sales, fixed currency operating income and adjusted fixed currency operating income measures eliminate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our international sales, operating income and adjusted operating income, respectively, and promote a better understanding of our underlying sales and operating income trends. Fixed currency amounts are based on translation into U.S. dollars at fixed foreign currency exchange rates established by management at the beginning of 2011.
These measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to GAAP, and may be different from Non-GAAP measures used by other companies. Investors should not rely on any single financial measure when evaluating our business. We recommend that investors view these measures in conjunction with the GAAP measures included in this Financial Discussion and have provided reconciliations of reported GAAP amounts to the Non-GAAP amounts on pages 30-32.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Item 2, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include expectations concerning the timing, costs, cash expenditures, benefits and headcount impact of our 2011 Restructuring Plan initiatives, timing of the completion of the Nalco merger and the form of consideration to be paid in the merger, timing of long-term debt issuances, contributions to pension and post-retirement health care benefit plans, tax deductibility of goodwill, amortization expense, the impact of new accounting pronouncements, the impact of potential lawsuits or claims, gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits or uncertain tax positions and payments related thereto, timing of hedged transactions, future cash flow and sources of funding and nonperformance of financial counterparties. Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, we believe, estimate, project (including the negative or variations thereof) or similar terminology, generally identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may also represent challenging goals for us. These statements, which represent the companys expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those of such forward-looking statements. We caution that undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Some of the factors which could cause results to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statement are set forth under Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q. Except as required under applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our Forward-Looking Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We primarily use foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency debt and interest rate swaps to manage risks generally associated with interest rate and foreign exchange rate volatility and net investments in our foreign operations. We do not hold derivative financial instruments of a speculative nature. For a more detailed discussion of derivative instruments, refer to Note 5, entitled Financial Instruments and Hedging Transactions, of the consolidated financial statements located under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, beginning on page 13.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2011, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
During the period April 1 through June 30, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Note 13, entitled Commitments and Contingencies located under Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q beginning on page 24, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2011, we identify under Item 1A important factors which could affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q. See the section entitled Forward-Looking Statements located on page 39 of this Form 10-Q. We may also refer to such disclosure to identify factors that may cause results to differ from those expressed in other forward-looking statements made in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or webcasts open to the public.
The discussion below includes updates to these risk factor disclosures.
The proposed merger between Ecolab and Nalco Holding Company may present certain risks to the business and operations of Ecolab and to the combined company following the merger.
On July 19, 2011, Ecolab entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) among Ecolab, Sustainability Partners Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ecolab (Merger Sub), and Nalco Holding Company (Nalco). The Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of each of Ecolab and Nalco, provides for the merger of Nalco with and into Merger Sub (the Merger), with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock of Nalco issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares that are owned by Ecolab or Nalco or any of their respective wholly-owned subsidiaries and shares with respect to which appraisal rights are properly exercised and not withdrawn) will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the stockholder (subject to the reallocation), either 0.7005 shares of common stock of Ecolab or $38.80 in cash, without interest. The overall mix of consideration paid to stockholders of Nalco will be approximately 30% cash and 70% stock. The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions applicable to both Ecolab and Nalco including, among others, the receipt of required regulatory approvals, the adoption of the Merger Agreement by the Nalco stockholders and the approval of the issuance of Ecolab common stock to Nalcos stockholders by the stockholders of Ecolab.
The proposed merger may present certain risks to Ecolabs business and operations prior to the closing of the merger, including, among other things, risks that:
· the stockholders of Nalco may not adopt the merger agreement;
· the stockholders of Ecolab may not approve the issuance of Ecolab common stock to Nalco stockholders in the merger;
Risk Factors (continued)
· the companies may be unable to obtain regulatory approvals required for the merger, or that required regulatory approvals may delay the merger or result in the imposition of conditions that could have a material adverse effect on the combined company or cause the companies to abandon the merger;
· the conditions to the closing of the merger may not be satisfied;
· a material adverse change, event or occurrence may affect Ecolab or Nalco prior to the closing of the merger and may delay the merger or cause the companies to abandon the merger; and
· an unsolicited offer by another company to acquire shares or assets of Ecolab or Nalco could interfere with or prevent the merger.
In addition, certain risks may continue to exist after the closing of the merger, including, among other things, risks that:
· problems that may arise in successfully integrating the businesses of the companies, which may result in the combined company not operating as effectively and efficiently as expected;
· the merger may involve unexpected costs, unexpected liabilities or unexpected delays;
· the credit ratings of the combined company or its subsidiaries may be different from what the companies currently expect;
· the businesses of the companies may suffer as a result of uncertainty surrounding the merger; and
· disruptions from the transaction may harm relationships with customers, employees and suppliers.
Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements of Ecolab, Nalco and the combined company.
We expect to incur significant expenses in connection with our proposed merger with Nalco, including significant debt refinancing costs, professional fees and other fees, costs and expenses. If the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, we may be required under the terms of the merger agreement to pay Nalco a termination fee of $275 million and may be obligated to reimburse Nalco for up to $8 million in transaction-related expenses. We also expect to incur significant integration and restructuring fees and costs following completion of the merger.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
| |
April 1 - 30, 2011 |
|
6,677 |
|
$ |
52.17 |
|
0 |
|
3,898,533 |
|
May 1 - 31, 2011 |
|
981,937 |
|
$ |
52.67 |
|
948,975 |
|
17,949,558 |
|
June 1 - 30, 2011 |
|
68 |
|
$ |
54.25 |
|
0 |
|
17,949,558 |
|
Total |
|
988,682 |
|
$ |
52.67 |
|
948,975 |
|
17,949,558 |
|
(1) Includes 39,707 shares reacquired from employees and/or directors as swaps for the cost of stock options, or shares surrendered to satisfy minimum statutory tax obligations under our stock incentive plans.
(2) The average price paid per share includes brokerage commissions associated with publicly announced plan purchases plus the value of such other reacquired shares.
(3) As announced on February 26, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 additional shares of Common Stock, including shares to be repurchased under Rule 10b5-1. As announced on May 5, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase up to 15,000,000 additional shares of Common Stock, including shares to be repurchased under Rule 10b5-1. We intend to repurchase all shares under these authorizations, for which no expiration date has been established, in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions.
Item 5. Other Information
As previously reported on the companys Form 8-K dated May 5, 2011, Ecolabs Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 5, 2011. The fifth proposal was an advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation. As disclosed in the companys proxy statement, the Board of Directors recommended that stockholders vote for annual (1 year) frequency of future advisory votes. The proposal received the following votes:
1-Year |
|
2-Years |
|
3-Years |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non- |
|
160,907,070 |
|
2,379,850 |
|
20,634,493 |
|
1,339,790 |
|
15,768,962 |
|
Accordingly, the frequency selected by a majority of the stockholders was for such vote to occur every year, supporting the Board of Directors initial recommendation.
On August 4, 2011, pursuant to a recommendation of the Boards Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors determined that the company shall conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the companys named executive officers pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 every year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, or until the Board of Directors otherwise determines that a different frequency for such votes is in the best interests of the company.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report:
(15) Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information.
(31) Rule 13a - 14(a) Certifications.
(32) Section 1350 Certifications.
Pursuant to Rule 406T, the following exhibit is furnished and should not be deemed filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
(101) Interactive Data File.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
ECOLAB INC. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2011 |
|
By: |
/s/John J. Corkrean |
|
|
|
John J. Corkrean Vice President & Corporate Controller (duly authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
|
Document |
|
Method of Filing |
(15) |
|
Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information. |
|
Filed herewith electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
(31) |
|
Rule 13a - 14(a) Certifications. |
|
Filed herewith electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
(32) |
|
Section 1350 Certifications. |
|
Filed herewith electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
(101) |
|
Interactive Data File. |
|
Filed herewith electronically |