UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 28, 2003
Commission File No. 0-17038
Concord Camera Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey 13-3152196
(State or other jurisdiction of (I. R. S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
4000 Hollywood Boulevard, Presidential Circle - 6th Floor, North Tower,
Hollywood, Florida 33021
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(954) 331-4200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____
---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ___ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes X No ___
---
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock (computed by reference to the
closing sale price) held by non-affiliates of the Company as of the last
business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
was $116,126,449.
As of August 29, 2003, there were 28,610,766 shares of the Company's Common
Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
See Exhibit Index -- Page 48
PART I
Unless the context indicates otherwise, when used in this report, "we," "us,"
"our," "Concord" and the "Company" refer to Concord Camera Corp. and its
subsidiaries. Beginning in Fiscal 1999, the Company changed its fiscal year to
end on the Saturday closest to June 30. Fiscal 2003 refers to the Fiscal Year
ended June 28, 2003, Fiscal 2002 refers to the Fiscal Year ended June 29, 2002,
Fiscal 2001 refers to the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2001, Fiscal 2000 refers to
the Fiscal Year ended July 1, 2000, and Fiscal 1999 refers to the Fiscal Year
ended July 3, 1999. Prior to 1999, the Company's fiscal year was the
twelve-month period ended June 30. References to "fiscal year" incorporate this
usage.
All information in this report gives effect to a two-for-one stock split
effective on April 14, 2000 to shareholders of record on March 27, 2000.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report and the documents that are incorporated by reference into this
report contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe
harbor provisions of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some
of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should,"
"seeks," "intends," "plans," "estimates," or "anticipates" or the negative of
those words or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements concern
expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated
events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not
historical facts. They represent only our present belief regarding future
events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and involve
risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual
results to differ, perhaps materially, from the anticipated results indicated in
the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the factors that
could cause actual results to differ, please see the discussion under "Risk
Factors" contained in this report. Any forward-looking statements contained in
this report, or in the documents incorporated by reference into this report,
represent our estimates only as of the date of this report, or as of such
earlier dates as are indicated, and should not be relied upon as representing
our estimates as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update
forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim
any obligation to do so, even if our estimates change.
Item 1. The Business.
Our Company
We design, develop, manufacture and sell on a worldwide basis high quality,
popularly priced, easy-to-use image capture products. Our products include
digital image capture devices, 35mm and Advanced Photo System ("APS") (24mm)
traditional and single use cameras, and instant cameras. We believe we are the
fourth largest manufacturer of single use cameras in the world (behind Eastman
Kodak Company ("Kodak"), Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. ("Fuji") and Konica
Corporation).
We manufacture products in the People's Republic of China ("PRC"). Our
manufacturing facilities, together with several employee dormitories we lease,
comprise in excess of 600,000 square feet. We have operated in the PRC since
1984. Our manufacturing capabilities and facilities in the PRC are key
components of our low cost of production. Our Hong Kong management team, many of
whom live in the PRC, oversees our manufacturing activities. Our products are
conceptualized, designed, developed and engineered principally in design centers
in Hong Kong, the PRC and the United States.
-2-
We have evolved from a contract manufacturer and distributor of cameras to a
design and development service provider and manufacturer of high quality image
capture products with strong retail distribution. At the same time, we have
developed and manufacture a full line of lower priced digital cameras. Average
revenue per unit from our digital products is significantly higher than from our
traditional and single use camera products. In Fiscal 2003, we completed several
new digital camera development projects. We introduced to the marketplace 17 new
digital products which also provide platforms for the future development of
other digital products. Our design team is currently engaged in the development
of additional digital products. See "Products" below. The experience gained from
these development projects should enable us to compete effectively for supply
contracts with companies desiring to offer low cost digital camera solutions to
their customers.
We have two primary channels of distribution, our Design and Manufacturing
Services ("DMS") channel and our Retail Sales and Distribution ("RSD") channel.
Our DMS business is based on us supplying our customers with development,
design, engineering and manufacturing services. Our DMS customers have included
leading film, camera, telecommunication and technology companies. Our RSD
business sells private label and brand name image capture products to retailers
worldwide. We offer product and package design, and customer service to our
retail customers.
General
The mailing address of our headquarters is 4000 Hollywood Boulevard, Sixth
Floor, North Tower, Hollywood, Florida 33021, and our telephone number is (954)
331-4200. Concord was incorporated in New Jersey in 1982. The address of our
website is www.concord-camera.com. Through a link on the Investor Relations
section of our website, we make available the following filings as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to
the SEC: Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All
such filings are available free of charge.
Photography Market Overview
There are four main categories of cameras within the amateur photography market:
o Digital cameras - A digital camera uses an electronic sensor (versus
silver halide film) to electronically capture an image, which is then
stored in a memory device. Digital cameras with image review capability
allow for instantaneous viewing, and images can easily be downloaded to a
computer for viewing, manipulation, reproduction and storage. According to
IDC(1), approximately 30 million consumer digital cameras(2) were shipped
worldwide in 2002 (a 65% increase in the number of units shipped as
compared to 2001) generating shipment values of approximately $11
billion.(3)
o Single use cameras - Single use cameras are sold preloaded with film and
batteries and are designed to be used only once. After use, the consumer
returns the entire camera to the photo processor. The processor then
extracts the film and either disposes of the camera carcass or returns it
for recycling. According to the Photo Marketing Association ("PMA"), on a
unit basis, single use cameras account for approximately 87% of all
non-digital cameras sold worldwide, but we estimate this segment accounts
for less than 30% of worldwide amateur non-digital camera industry
revenues.
o 35mm and APS cameras - This category includes essentially all other
(non-single use) cameras that use silver halide film. Film formats include
both 35mm and APS. On a unit basis, 35mm and APS cameras account for about
11% of all non-digital cameras sold worldwide according to the PMA and we
estimate this segment accounts for about 40% of worldwide amateur
non-digital camera industry revenues.
------------
(1) IDC (a division of IDG) is a leading provider of industry analysis and
market data.
(2) "Consumer digital cameras" are cameras capturing images in digital format
only, and exclude digital cameras with interchangeable lenses ("digital
SLR") or cameras that operate only when connected to a PC ("PC cameras").
(3) According to IDC's weighted average of end user minimally advertised price
("MAP"). Source: IDC, Worldwide Digital Still Camera Forecast, 2003-2007,
May 2003.
-3-
o Instant cameras - Instant cameras provide the advantage of instant
photographs, but the cost per print is substantially higher than 35mm and
APS cameras. There is also a difference in the quality of prints produced
by instant cameras. On a unit basis, instant cameras account for about 1.5%
of all non-digital cameras sold worldwide according to the PMA and we
estimate this segment accounts for about 1 to 2% of worldwide amateur
non-digital camera industry revenues.
Market Trends
We expect to capitalize on a number of trends within the image capture industry,
including the following:
o Growth of Digital Photography. Digital photography is one of the fastest
growing areas of the photography market. According to IDC, worldwide
consumer digital camera shipments grew at an average rate of approximately
65% per year from 1999 through 2002, and are projected to grow at an average
rate of approximately 16% per year over the next three years with shipments
expected to surpass 53 million units in 2007. Despite their relatively
recent acceptance in the consumer market, digital camera sales have already
surpassed sales of instant cameras, single lens reflex cameras ("SLRs") and
traditional(4) 35mm and APS cameras. We believe we are well positioned to
address this market, with a design team focused on the development of
digital image capture devices and significant clean room facilities
dedicated to the manufacture and assembly of digital cameras. See
"Manufacturing Facilities" below.
o New Digital Image Capture Devices. In a clear departure from silver halide
photography, digital imaging enables images to be displayed and used in ways
that were previously impossible. Device manufacturers have begun to
incorporate image capture devices into cellular phones, personal digital
assistants, laptop computers and security monitoring devices.
o Growth of Single Use Cameras. Single use cameras are inexpensive, easy to
use and deliver high quality photographs. From 1999 through 2002, the number
of single use cameras sold worldwide grew at a compound annual rate of
10.1%, according to the PMA.
Our Growth Strategy
Our strategy is to become the leading producer of digital, single use and
traditional 35 mm and loyalty cameras at the opening price point in the retail
market while continuing to expand our DMS business. Our growth strategy includes
the following key elements:
o Continue to expand our RSD business. We continue to expand our RSD
business by increasing the number of customers, product listings and sales
volumes through the continued introduction of new products, many of which
are the result of our internal product development efforts. Our larger
retail customers include Aldi, Argos, Boots, Carrefour, Comp USA, CVS,
Eckerd, Family Dollar, Dollar General, Metro, Rite Aid, Ritz Camera Shops,
Target, Walgreens and Wal-Mart. We continue to invest in our internal sales
and marketing capabilities to expand our retail business.
In August 2002, we entered into two trademark licensing agreements with the
entity that purchased the assets of Polaroid Corporation ("Polaroid"). These
licenses enable us to market our single use (subject to the Japan
restriction under the Fuji license) and traditional film-based cameras (but
not instant or digital cameras) worldwide to retailers under the Polaroid
brand name. See "Licensing Activities" below.
We intend to capitalize on favorable trends in the digital and single use
camera markets by introducing new high quality cameras at affordable prices
for these targeted markets. The digital still camera and single use camera
markets are expected to offer significant growth potential in the next
several years. We have plans to expand our product offering in these
markets.
------------
(4) "Traditional" cameras do not include single use or digital cameras.
-4-
We also intend to explore RSD opportunities worldwide. Since Europe
comprises only 28% of our total RSD net sales, we believe potential
opportunities exist in this geographic region to market products with
well-recognized premium brand names such as Polaroid and to enter into
supply agreements for loyalty programs with the larger retailers. In
addition, we have entered into a distribution agreement to sell our products
in Russia and are pursuing additional opportunities elsewhere in the world.
o Enhance our DMS business. Over the years we have acquired DMS business
from several leading companies including Kodak, Hewlett-Packard Company
("Hewlett-Packard"), Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. ("Nokia") and Polaroid.
Currently, we are manufacturing two single use camera products for Kodak
under two separate Supply Agreements, the most recent of which was entered
into in September 2002 and has a minimum term of forty-two months. We
continue to invest in product development and low cost manufacturing to
increase business from our existing DMS customers.
o Develop new DMS relationships. We intend to leverage our existing
relationships and our strong capabilities in engineering, design and
manufacturing to establish new DMS relationships. We intend to attract new
DMS customers by exploiting our expertise in designing and low cost
manufacturing of digital and film-based image capture devices for leading
companies.
o Differentiate ourselves from other contract manufacturers. We will
continue to differentiate ourselves from our competitors by providing DMS
customers with dedicated design and development expertise at our facilities
in Hollywood, Florida, Hong Kong and the PRC, as well as our advanced, high
quality, low cost manufacturing capabilities.
o Pursue strategic relationships and acquisitions. When appropriate, we
intend to seek strategic relationships with established companies in our
industry, as well as acquisitions that will help us further expand our
customer base, product mix and distribution channels, thereby enhancing our
DMS and RSD businesses.
Products
We design, develop, manufacture and sell image capture products. Our products
include digital image capture devices, 35mm and APS traditional and single use
cameras, and instant cameras. We sell to our retail customers our own branded
and private label products, many of which we have developed and manufactured. We
also serve as a contract manufacturer of developed and co-developed products for
our customers.
We manufacture and assemble our products in the PRC both as a contract
manufacturer on a DMS basis and for direct sale under our trademarks and brand
names, and under private label brand names. In addition, we purchase some
products from third parties. New products are, and we expect they will continue
to be, designed and developed both independently and on a co-development basis
with existing and potential customers.
We offer a wide variety of CMOS(5) and CCD-imager(6) based digital cameras,
ranging from those with VGA(7) resolution up to and including 5.0 megapixels.
Over the next several years, digital cameras are expected to represent a
material portion of our sales as well as an increasing portion of worldwide
camera sales. During Fiscal 2003, we completed the design and development of
distinct new digital still camera platforms and currently have additional
product platforms in various stages of development. These new platforms are
significant for several reasons. First, they demonstrate our ability to
internally develop CCD-based platforms. Secondly, the optical modules and
lensing systems for these cameras were designed by Concord and represent
significant technological advances in opto-mechanics, focus and motion control
for higher resolution optical systems used in 3.0 megapixel and higher cameras.
From these platforms we have built, and recently began selling, new distinct
camera models. These platforms are designed for configuration flexibility so
that features, styles and user interfaces can be customized quickly, allowing
for the creation of numerous models and appearances using a common base to
accommodate different user and customer preferences.
-------------
(5) "CMOS" is the acronym for complementary metal-oxide semiconductor. 6 "CCD"
is the acronym for charge-coupled device.
(6) "CCD" is the acronym for charge-coupled device.
(7) "VGA" is the acronym for video graphics array.
-5-
We also offer a complete line of single use cameras using platforms that enable
us to change the optics, flash, encasements, finishes and packaging to
accommodate different user and customer preferences. Our 35mm camera products
range from entry-level to higher-end, fully featured zoom models and include
models used by certain RSD customers to support special promotion and loyalty
programs they offer to their customers.
Our expenditures for product design and development increased to $8.5 million in
Fiscal 2003 from $7.6 million in Fiscal 2002. For additional information
regarding amounts we spent on product development activities, see "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" below.
We anticipate product development costs to increase in Fiscal 2004.
RSD Sales
We make direct sales to retailers on a worldwide basis through offices and/or
representatives in the United States, Latin America and Canada ("Concord
Americas"), offices in the United Kingdom, France and Germany ("Concord
Europe"), and offices in Hong Kong ("Concord Asia"). Concord Asia is also
involved in DMS sales, as well as sales to and sales support for large retail
customers in the Americas, Europe and Asia. We have marketed our products to
retailers on a private label basis and/or under the following brand names:
o Argus(R) o Goldline(R)
o Apex(R) o Keystone(R)
o Concord(R) o Le Clic(R)
o Concord Eye Q(R) o Polaroid(R)
o Fun Shooter(R)
We have established a strong presence with our retail customers by offering
attractive, easy to use and popularly priced digital, APS, and 35mm format
cameras and 35mm and APS format single use cameras. Because of Concord's design
and development capabilities we can offer unique, customized product solutions
to our customers. We sold tens of millions of cameras last year worldwide,
including more than 100 different products sold from over 25,000 outlets.
A primary reason for our success in achieving year over year growth with our
retail customers has been our ability to innovate and customize our popularly
priced imaging products to meet their unique supply chain, product and packaging
requirements. We also sell our products to other consumer product companies who
use our products as premiums in connection with their product sales.
We have in-house sales and marketing personnel who make the majority of our
direct sales to DMS and retail customers. To assist our in-house RSD sales
staff, we also have nine independent sales agents who serve specific geographic
areas. Sales agents generally receive commissions ranging from 1.0% to 3.0% of
net sales to retail customers, depending on the type of customer, and may act as
selling agents for products of other manufacturers.
Our direct sales to retailers represented $145.8 million, or 76.8% of total net
sales in Fiscal 2003, and $95.7 million or 74.0% of total net sales in Fiscal
2002. The year over year increase in sales was fueled by the introduction of new
products and marketing programs. In Fiscal 2003, we had two retail customers
each of whose purchases represented in excess of 10% of our total net sales: (i)
Wal-Mart (19.1% of total net sales); and (ii) Walgreens (17.2% of total net
sales).
-6-
DMS Sales
We have developed products and long-term relationships with some of the world's
largest and most successful film, camera, global communication and technology
companies. Relationships with our DMS customers are handled by our in-house
sales and marketing personnel.
In Fiscal 2003, sales to Kodak accounted for 15.6% of our total net sales. DMS
customers accounted for $44.0 million, or 23.2%, of our total net sales in
Fiscal 2003.
Future DMS Relationships
We believe we are positioned to continue to benefit from an outsourcing trend in
the traditional, single use and digital image capture device markets, including
wireless transmission. By investing significant funds in development, design,
engineering and manufacturing capabilities, we have become a high quality, low
cost contract manufacturer. In addition, we believe DMS customers are
increasingly searching for development and co-development partners that can
provide them with value-added assistance in the design, development and testing
of innovative technologies. Our ability to serve not only as a reliable, quality
contract manufacturer but also as a valuable strategic partner positions us for
continued growth in our DMS business.
We are in discussions and/or negotiations with existing and potential DMS
customers for the development, design and production of a number of new
products. Our product development capabilities enable us to offer proprietary
assistance in the development of products for DMS customers. We target potential
DMS customers with: (a) an established brand name; (b) existing channels of
distribution; (c) multiple product outsourcing potential (traditional, single
use and digital cameras) and (d) products complementary to our manufacturing and
value-added skills.
Competition
The image capture industry is highly competitive. As a manufacturer and
distributor of high quality, popularly priced image capture devices, we
encounter substantial competition from a number of firms, many of which have
longer operating histories, more established markets and more extensive
facilities than we have. Many of our competitors have greater resources than we
have or may reasonably be expected to have in the foreseeable future. Our
competitive position is dependent upon our ability to continue manufacturing in
the PRC.
Licensing Activities
In August 2002, we entered into our two Polaroid license agreements. These
licenses provide for the exclusive (with the exception of products already
released by Polaroid into the distribution chain), worldwide use of the Polaroid
brand trademark in connection with the manufacture, distribution, promotion and
sale of 35mm and APS single use cameras, 35mm and APS manual and motorized
cameras, including zoom cameras, and certain related accessories. The licenses
do not include instant or digital cameras. Each license includes an initial term
of three and a half years and may be renewed at our option for an additional
three-year period.
We are one of a limited number of companies licensed by Fuji to manufacture,
remanufacture and sell single use cameras. Single use cameras accounted for
$101.4 million, or 53.4% of our Fiscal 2003 net sales. We have a worldwide
(excluding Japan until January 1, 2005) non-exclusive license to use certain of
Fuji's patents and patent applications related to single use cameras. The
license extends until the later of February 26, 2021 or the expiration of the
last of the licensed Fuji patents to expire.
-7-
Manufacturing
We conduct all of our manufacturing in the PRC. Our vertically integrated
manufacturing facilities include plastic injection molding of lenses and other
parts, stamping and machining of metal parts, manufacturing of printed circuit
boards ("PCBs"), assembly of PCBs using surface mount technology machinery and
manual insertion, application specific integrated circuit bonding, quality
control, quality assurance, painting and final assembly and testing.
Manufacturing Facilities
We began constructing our current manufacturing facilities in the PRC in Fiscal
1996. We expanded them in Fiscal 1999 by increasing our manufacturing and
related dormitory facilities to over 600,000 square feet. See "Properties"
below. In February 2000, we opened a new production facility dedicated to
digital image capture devices. Two-thirds of this new facility is comprised of
class 10,000 clean rooms where the ambient air particle count is controlled and
special gowns are worn by all personnel to maintain a high level of cleanliness.
This facility, located on the site of our PRC manufacturing operations, has a
fully trained and dedicated on-site staff including operators, engineers
(mechanical, electrical and optical) and production managers and supervisors.
Our PRC manufacturing facilities received the Social Accountability 8000
("SA8000") certification in November 2001. The SA8000 is an international
standard designed to ensure safe working conditions, fair management practices
and the protection of workers' rights. Our PRC manufacturing facilities are ISO
9000 and 9001 accredited.
Equipment and Raw Materials
We own the tools and equipment necessary to manufacture many of the components
used in our products. Numerous manufacturers and suppliers located in the Far
East and other parts of the world supply us with raw materials and various
components that we do not manufacture. Raw materials and components that we
purchase include film, batteries, glass lenses, plastic resins, metal,
packaging, electronic components, sensors, digital signal processors, memory and
displays.
Component procurement for digital cameras is more complex than for traditional
and single use cameras. Availability, delays in procurement, and price
fluctuations of the components for digital cameras, which may be outside our
control, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
PRC Operations
Our operations and profitability are substantially dependent upon our
manufacturing and assembly activities. Our current processing agreement with the
PRC entities expires in October 2006. We expect to continue manufacturing in the
PRC after 2006 either under a renewal of our processing agreement or pursuant to
some other form of legal authorization. We intend to continue to expand our
operations in the PRC, but there can be no assurance we will be able to do so.
In April 2002, we established and registered a wholly foreign owned enterprise
("WFOE"), named Concord Camera (Shenzhen) Company Limited ("Concord Shenzhen"),
pursuant to the law of the PRC concerning enterprises with sole foreign
investment. The business license of Concord Shenzhen, which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Concord Camera HK Limited ("Concord HK"), permits it to
manufacture and sell its products both in the PRC and internationally. Concord
Shenzhen started operating in September 2002.
-8-
Trademarks and Patents
We own trademarks which include, but are not limited to, the CONCORD(R),
KEYSTONE(R), CONCORD EYE Q(R), GO WIRELESS(TM), FUN SHOOTER(R), LE CLIC(R),
GOLDLINE(R) and APEX(R) names for cameras sold in the United States and numerous
foreign countries and the ARGUS(R) name in numerous foreign countries. We
license the trademark POLAROID(R) for exclusive use worldwide in connection with
the manufacture, distribution, promotion and sale of single use and traditional
film-based cameras (excluding instant and digital cameras). We own numerous
patents, certain of which are used in our current products. We have applied for,
and will continue to apply for, in the United States and foreign countries,
patents to protect the inventions and technology developed by or for the
Company. We do not believe our competitiveness and market share are dependent on
the ultimate disposition of our patent applications. We license patents and
patent applications related to single use cameras from Fuji in connection with
the manufacture and sale of single use cameras.
Employees
As of August 1, 2003, we had 236 employees, 55% of them were located in Hong
Kong and the PRC. None of our employees are represented by collective bargaining
agreements.
Pursuant to our agreements with PRC governmental agencies, these agencies
provide us with workers at our PRC manufacturing facilities. During Fiscal 2003,
based upon production demand, we were provided with approximately 3,700 to 5,800
workers. We believe our relationship with these workers is good.
Financial Information about Geographic Areas
For financial information about geographic areas, see Note 22, "Geographic Area
Information", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 2. Properties.
In Hollywood, Florida, we lease our principal office space, which consists of
approximately 20,000 square feet. We also lease a domestic warehouse in Fort
Lauderdale, Florida, which consists of approximately 13,700 square feet, of
which about 825 square feet is office space. These leases expire on January 31,
2014 and January 31, 2009, respectively.
In Hong Kong, we lease a total of approximately 33,000 square feet of business
and warehouse space comprised of one floor under a lease expiring in 2047 and
four floors under a lease expiring in July 2004, which we can extend to July 31,
2006. In the United Kingdom, we own an 11,000 square foot building on a one-half
acre parcel. We also lease warehouse and/or office space in France, Canada and
Germany in connection with the activities of our subsidiaries in these
jurisdictions.
In the PRC, we own manufacturing facilities in the Longgang District of
Shenzhen, and we lease several employee dormitories and a cafeteria. Pursuant to
land use agreements entered into with certain PRC governmental agencies, we
obtained the title and rights to use approximately eight acres of land for
factory buildings, dormitories and related ancillary buildings. Under the land
use agreement, we have the right to use the land through the year 2038. At the
end of the term, a PRC governmental agency will own the facilities and we will
have the right to lease the land and improvements thereon at then prevailing
lease terms.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
See Note 16, "Litigation and Settlements", in the accompanying Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
-9-
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
-10-
PART II
Item 5. Market for Company's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters.
Our Common Stock has been quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"LENS" since July 12, 1988. The following table shows, for each quarter in
Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, the high and low sales prices per share of our
Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
Quarter Ended High Low
------------- ---- ----
June 28, 2003.......................... $7.35 $4.96
March 29, 2003......................... $6.25 $5.00
December 28, 2002...................... $6.50 $4.28
September 28, 2002..................... $6.00 $3.55
June 29, 2002.......................... $9.15 $4.95
March 30, 2002......................... $9.39 $6.00
December 29, 2001...................... $7.79 $3.80
September 29, 2001..................... $6.23 $3.80
The closing price of our Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market on August
29, 2003 was $11.98 per share. As of August 29, 2003, there were 988
shareholders of record of our Common Stock.
The Company has never paid cash dividends and does not presently intend to pay
cash dividends.
-11-
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
Fiscal Year Ended
-----------------------------------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30, July 1, July 3,
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales $189,783 $129,317 $180,061 $167,720 $115,386
Cost of products sold 153,532 110,345 152,598 126,148 86,664
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross profit 36,251 18,972 27,463 41,572 28,722
Operating expenses 31,651(c) 28,683 45,056 25,607 20,561
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss) 4,600 (9,711) (17,593) 15,965 8,161
Other (income), net (2,372) (3,060) (4,892) (883) (441)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before taxes 6,972 (6,651) (12,701) 16,848 8,602
Provision (benefit) for taxes 569 (1,403) (931) (2,751) 893
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 6,403 $ (5,248) $(11,770) $ 19,599 $ 7,709
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Basic earnings (loss) per share(a) $ 0.23 $ (0.19) $ (0.45) $ 0.89 $ 0.35
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(a) $ 0.22 $ (0.19) $ (0.45) $ 0.81 $ 0.33
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital $121,077 $128,382 $131,003 $ 52,600 $ 37,447
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Total assets $205,814 $198,076 $213,666 $134,003 $ 96,647
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Total debt $ --(b) $ 14,934 $ 15,416 $ 19,555 $ 29,735
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Total stockholders' equity $156,828 $149,156 $154,337 $ 66,290 $ 42,696
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
(a) Per share data for all periods presented has been restated to reflect a
two-for-one stock split in Fiscal 2000.
(b) This debt was retired in August 2002. For further discussion, see Notes 1
and 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(c) Includes $0.9 million of variable stock-based compensation expense. For
further discussion, see Notes 1 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
-12-
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Fiscal 2003 consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto.
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed below
are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve
risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to economic, governmental,
political, competitive and technological factors affecting Concord's operations,
markets, products, prices and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report
and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). See
"Risk Factors" below. These factors may cause results to differ materially from
the statements made in this report or otherwise made by or on behalf of Concord.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop, manufacture and sell on a worldwide basis high quality,
popularly priced, easy-to-use image capture products. Our products include
digital image capture devices, 35 mm and APS traditional and single use cameras
and instant cameras. We manufacture and assemble our products in the PRC for
sales to retailers under our brand names, on a premium and private label basis,
and to DMS customers.
Over the last several years, we have evolved from a contract manufacturer and
distributor of cameras to a design and development service provider and
manufacturer of high quality image capture products with strong retail
distribution. We have improved the quality and capacity of our manufacturing
operations to a world class standard and have acquired additional core
technology, design and engineering expertise which has, in turn, enabled us to
improve product performance and picture quality and to respond quickly to
customer requirements.
We sell directly to our RSD customers on a worldwide basis through offices
and/or representatives in Concord Americas, Concord Europe, and Concord Asia.
Concord Asia is involved in all DMS sales, retail sales in the PRC and Asia as
well as free on board ("FOB") Hong Kong sales to large retail customers in the
Americas, Asia, and Europe. We attribute these FOB sales to the region where our
customer's home office is located. We have marketed our products to retailers on
a private label basis and /or under the brand names Concord(R), Polaroid(R),
Concord EyeQ(R), Keystone(R), Le Clic(R), Argus(R), Apex(R), Goldline(R) and Fun
Shooter(R).
As a contract manufacturer, we have also developed products with some of the
world's largest and most successful film, camera, global communication and
technology companies. Our relationships with our DMS customers are handled by
our in-house sales and marketing personnel. In Fiscal 2003, one DMS customer's
purchases represented more than 10% of our total net sales.
As a result of our strategy over the last several years, our sales and customer
mix has become more diversified. Sales to our RSD customers accounted for 76.7%
of total net sales for Fiscal 2003 compared to 32.3% of total net sales during
Fiscal 2000 and sales to our DMS customers represented 23.3% of total net sales
in Fiscal 2003 compared to 67.7% of total net sales in Fiscal 2000. The
evolution of our DMS and branded products into digital and other image capture
devices has diversified our product base. In Fiscal 2003, our third year of
selling digital image capture devices, such products accounted for 34.1% of our
total net sales as compared to 10.7% in Fiscal 2002. Net sales of single use
cameras accounted for 53.4% of total net sales in Fiscal 2003, compared to 70.1%
in Fiscal 2002.
We intend to continue obtaining additional business from our current customers,
and to establish new DMS and RSD relationships by positioning ourselves as an
innovative designer, developer, manufacturer, and marketer of high quality,
popularly priced image capture products.
-13-
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Our application of
accounting policies affects these estimates and assumptions. Actual results
could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements and accompanying notes:
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
The provision for doubtful accounts is based on our assessment of the
collectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of accounts
receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer's credit worthiness
or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, our estimates of
the recoverability of amounts owed to us could be adversely affected.
Inventory
Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon future demand forecasts. If
there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or there
is a higher rate of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing
technology and customer requirements, we may be required to reduce our inventory
values resulting from lower of cost or market value adjustments and our gross
profit could be adversely affected. Due to the shorter life cycles of digital
products, the obsolescence risk is more significant as it relates to these
products.
Deferred Taxes
The deferred tax valuation allowance is based on our assessment of the
realizability of our deferred tax assets on an ongoing basis and may be adjusted
from time to time as necessary. In determining the valuation allowance, we have
considered future taxable income and the feasibility of tax planning initiatives
and strategies. Should we determine that it is more likely than not that we will
realize certain of our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment would be
required to reduce the existing valuation allowance and increase income. On the
contrary, if we determine that we would not be able to realize our recorded
deferred tax asset, an adjustment to increase our valuation allowance would be
charged to the results of operations in the period such conclusion was made.
Such charge could have an adverse effect on our provision for income taxes
included in our results of operations.
Sales Returns
A provision for sales returns is established based on historical trends in
product returns. If future returns are higher than we predicted based on the
historical data, our net sales could be adversely affected.
Impairment of Long-lived and Other Assets
Periodically, we review our long-lived assets for impairment. We will record an
impairment loss when indications of impairment are present where undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'
carrying amounts. For royalty related assets, we will record an impairment loss
if the total expected royalty payments to be made over the life of an agreement,
excluding any minimum required payments, are less than the royalty related
assets' carrying value. The total expected royalty payments to be made over the
life of an agreement are dependent on management's estimates about future sales
volumes. Because judgment is required to estimate future sales volumes, the
estimates are not necessarily indicative of the sales volumes that will be
actually realized in the future. Such assets that are reviewed include patents,
goodwill, licensing and royalty agreements and certain property, plant and
equipment.
-14-
Accounting for Litigation and Settlements
We are involved in various legal proceedings. Due to their nature, such legal
proceedings involve inherent uncertainties including, but not limited to, court
rulings, negotiations between affected parties and the possibility of
governmental intervention. Management assesses the probability of loss for such
contingencies and accrues a liability and/or discloses the relevant
circumstances, as appropriate. Management believes that any liability to the
Company that may arise as a result of currently pending legal proceedings will
not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company
taken as a whole.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Under SEC regulations, we are required to disclose the following off-balance
sheet arrangements, if applicable:
- Any obligation under certain guarantee contracts;
- Any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an
unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit,
liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets;
- Any obligation under certain derivative instruments;
- Any obligation arising out of a material variable interest held by us
in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market
risk or credit risk support to us, or engages in leasing, hedging or
research and development services with us.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that we are required to
disclose pursuant to these regulations, other than those described in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements. We do not have, nor do we engage in,
transactions with any special purpose entities. We are not engaged in hedging
activities and had no forward exchange contracts outstanding at June 28, 2003.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into operating lease commitments,
purchase commitments and other contractual obligations. These transactions are
recognized in our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and are more fully discussed below in
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AS OF JUNE 28, 2003
(in Millions)
Payments due by period More
Less than than 5
Contractual Obligations Total 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years years
----------------------- ----- ------ --------- --------- ------
Operating Leases $ 5.2 $ 1.1 $ 1.2 $ 1.0 $ 1.9
Purchase Obligation 2.0 2.0 - - -
Patent, Trademark, Licensing and Royalty Obligations 6.3 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.8
------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total $ 13.5 $ 4.6 $ 3.2 $ 2.0 $ 3.7
====== ====== ====== ====== =====
-15-
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
For a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, see Note 1,
"Recently Issued Accounting Standards" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
-16-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002
Net Sales
Net sales for Fiscal 2003 set a Company record and were $189.8 million, an
increase of $60.5 million, or 46.8%, as compared to net sales for Fiscal 2002.
Sales in both our RSD and DMS businesses increased over last year. For Fiscal
2003, RSD net sales were $145.8 million, an increase of $50.1 million, or 52.3%
over Fiscal 2002. The increase in net sales resulted principally from new
digital camera sales, sales of Polaroid branded single use and traditional
cameras, new accounts and organic growth from existing accounts due to sell
through and new product introductions. DMS net sales were $44.0 million for
Fiscal 2003, an increase of $10.4 million, or 30.9%, as compared to Fiscal 2002.
The increase in DMS sales was due primarily to sales of a new single use camera
being manufactured for Kodak under a supply agreement entered into in September
2002, coupled with digital camera sales to a Fuji subsidiary, Legend Group
Limited in the PRC and Visioneer, Inc., and other sales to existing customers,
partially offset by the previously disclosed expiration of certain DMS
contracts.
Net sales of Concord Asia for Fiscal 2003 were $46.2 million, an increase of
$11.8 million, or 34.6%, as compared to Fiscal 2002. The increase was primarily
due to higher DMS net sales to Kodak.
Net sales of Concord Americas for Fiscal 2003 were $101.9 million, an increase
of $33.2 million, or 48.3%, as compared to Fiscal 2002. The increase was
primarily due to new digital camera sales, the success of certain new marketing
programs, increased penetration with existing customers, and the positive sell
through of certain new products.
Net sales of Concord Europe for Fiscal 2003 were $41.7 million, an increase of
$15.4 million, or 58.6%, as compared to Fiscal 2002. This increase was
principally due to new digital camera sales.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for Fiscal 2003 was $36.3 million, an increase of $17.3 million, or
91.1%, as compared to Fiscal 2002. Gross profit margin (gross profit expressed
as a percentage of net sales) increased to 19.1% for Fiscal 2003 as compared to
14.7% for Fiscal 2002. Fiscal 2003 included a $2.2 million pretax benefit
related to a favorable dispute resolution partially offset by $0.8 million of
additional air freight costs due to the West Coast dock worker's labor dispute,
while Fiscal 2002 included $3.1 million of net inventory provisions.
Additionally, Fiscal 2003 gross profit margins were positively impacted by
significantly increased sales accompanied by the related efficiency gains in
manufacturing. Product development costs in dollars and as a percentage of net
sales for Fiscal 2003 and 2002, included in cost of products sold, were $8.5
million (4.5%) and $7.6 million (5.9%), respectively.
Operating Expenses
Selling expenses for Fiscal 2003 were $8.9 million, or 4.7% of net sales. Last
year, selling expenses were $6.3 million, or 4.9% of net sales. The increase was
primarily due to additional sales and marketing personnel, higher freight and
handling costs, and royalties related to the Polaroid brand licenses, all of
which were attributable to the Company's year over year sales growth.
General and administrative expenses were $20.6 million, or 10.9% of net sales
for Fiscal 2003. This compared to $21.0 million, or 16.2% of net sales last
year. Fiscal 2003 general and administrative expenses included a $0.5 million
reduction in expense due to a payment from Polaroid in settlement of Concord's
outstanding Polaroid claims related to the Polaroid bankruptcy filing, while
Fiscal 2002 general and administrative expenses included a $1.6 million accounts
receivable provision due to the Polaroid bankruptcy, a $1.1 million charitable
contribution for victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, and a net
$0.7 million provision due to the Kmart Corporation bankruptcy. The remaining
elements of general and administrative expenses increased year over year by $3.5
million primarily due to additional staffing, professional and insurance costs,
and other costs associated with the Company's growth.
-17-
In April 2002, we uncovered a fraudulent scheme including check forgery by a
former employee, which resulted in the embezzlement of $1.3 million over an
eighteen-month period ending in April 2002, the preponderance of which occurred
in Fiscal 2002. Our investigation confirmed that the former employee acted alone
and the misappropriated funds have been identified. We have recovered all but
$0.1 million of the embezzlement from a combination of insurance proceeds,
assets secured and amounts recovered from the individual. Accordingly, we have
recorded accrued receivables, net of cash recoveries, of $0.1 million and $1.2
million in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively. In addition,
we have recorded under the caption "(Recovery) of operating expenses, net" in
the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for Fiscal 2002, $1.2
million related to the recovery, which is net of $0.1 million of expenses
related to the investigation and recovery efforts. The entire amount of the
recovery was recorded in the third quarter of Fiscal 2002 due to the fact that
it was impractical to determine the impact on Fiscal 2002 quarterly periods. The
embezzled amounts related to the prior fiscal year were not significant.
Variable stock-based compensation expense for Fiscal 2003 was $0.9 million as
compared to no expense in Fiscal 2002, primarily because the Company's Common
Stock price was higher on June 28, 2003 than the October 2001 repriced stock
options' exercise price of $5.97 and on June 29, 2002 was below the repriced
stock options' exercise price of $5.97. See Note 1, "Stock-Based Compensation"
in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Interest expense decreased by $1.3 million, or 51.2%, to $1.2 million for Fiscal
2003 from $2.5 million for Fiscal 2002. The lower interest expense in Fiscal
2003 was attributable to the repayment of the $15.0 million, 11% Senior Notes
("Senior Notes") in August 2002.
Other (Income), Net
Other (income), net was $(2.4) million and $(3.1) million for Fiscal 2003 and
Fiscal 2002, respectively. Other (income), net primarily includes investment
income, foreign exchange gains and losses, directors' fees, and certain investor
relations costs. Fiscal 2002 included $1.2 million of non-recurring income from
an arbitration award, while Fiscal 2003 included $1.4 million due to foreign
exchange gains. Investment income for Fiscal 2003 was $1.5 million as compared
to $2.4 million for Fiscal 2002. Fiscal 2002 included higher investment income
primarily attributable to higher interest rates.
Income Taxes
As a company engaged in processing activities in the PRC, we currently do not
pay income or turnover taxes in the PRC, but there can be no assurance we will
not be required to pay such taxes in the future. Hong Kong is taxed separately
from the PRC. Concord HK's annual tax rate increased from 8% to 8.75% effective
for Fiscal 2003.
As a company engaged in processing activities in the PRC, we have never paid any
income or turnover tax to the PRC related to those activities in the PRC.
Existing PRC statutes can be construed as providing for a minimum of 10% to 15%
income tax and a 3% turnover tax on our processing activities; however, the PRC
has never attempted to enforce those statutes. We have been advised that the
PRC's State Tax Bureau is reviewing the applicability of those statutes to
processing activities of the type engaged in by us, but it has not yet announced
any final decisions as to the taxability of those activities. After consultation
with our tax advisors, we do not believe any tax exposure we may have on account
of our processing operations in the PRC will be material to our financial
statements.
-18-
We do not provide for U.S. federal income taxes on undistributed earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries because we intend to permanently reinvest such earnings.
Undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries approximated $49.0 million as
of June 28, 2003. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might
be payable if such earnings were ever remitted. However, no withholding taxes
would be payable under current law. For U.S. federal tax purposes, as of June
28, 2003, we have net operating loss carryforwards of $7.8 million, of which
$4.3 million was attributable to deductions associated with stock option
exercises, that expire as follows: $2.8 million in 2010 and the balance
thereafter. Additionally, we have $10.6 million of net operating loss
carryforwards related to our foreign operations, $8.2 million of which relates
to Hong Kong, which have no expiration dates.
Each year we evaluate our deferred tax assets. As part of assessing the
realizability of our deferred tax assets, we evaluate whether it is more likely
than not that some portion, or all of our deferred tax assets, will be realized.
The realization of our deferred tax assets relates directly to our tax planning
initiatives and strategies for U.S. federal and state and Hong Kong tax
purposes. As of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002 based on all the available
evidence, we determined that it is more likely than not that our domestic and
Hong Kong net deferred tax assets will be fully realized. Consequently, we did
not adjust the valuation allowance, except for $0.2 million related solely to
the utilization of a potential capital loss associated with the Company's
short-term investments. We also evaluated our European net deferred tax assets
and determined that $0.4 million and $1.2 million were to remain recorded as a
valuation allowance as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively. For
Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, our effective tax rates were 8.2%,
(21.1%), and (7.3%), respectively. Our future effective tax rate will depend
upon the apportionment between foreign and domestic taxable income and losses,
and the statutory rates of the related tax jurisdictions.
Net Income (Loss)
As a result of the matters described above, we reported net income of $6.4
million, or $0.22 per diluted share, for Fiscal 2003 as compared to a net loss
of $(5.2) million, or $(0.19) per share, for Fiscal 2002.
Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001
Net Sales
Net sales for Fiscal 2002 were $129.3 million, a decrease of $50.7 million, or
28.2%, as compared to net sales for Fiscal 2001. The decrease in net sales
resulted principally from decreases in sales to DMS customers partially offset
by an increase in sales to new and existing RSD customers. On a comparative
basis, in Fiscal 2002 the decrease in DMS sales was attributed to the lack of
sales of a certain digital product to a former customer, significantly lower
sales of instant cameras, and decreases in sales of both digital and film based
products. The increase in RSD net sales was primarily due to increases in sales
to leading retailers in the Americas. For Fiscal 2002, RSD net sales were $95.7
million, an increase of $12.4 million, or 14.9%, as compared to Fiscal 2001. For
Fiscal 2002, DMS net sales were $33.6 million, a decrease of $63.1 million, or
65.2% as compared to Fiscal 2001.
Net sales of Concord Asia for Fiscal 2002 were $34.4 million, a decrease of
$62.5 million, or 64.5%, as compared to Fiscal 2001. The decrease was due to
lower DMS net sales.
Net sales of Concord Americas for Fiscal 2002, were $68.7 million, an increase
of $11.9, or 20.9% as compared to Fiscal 2001. The increase was primarily due to
the success of certain new marketing programs, increased penetration with
existing customers, and the positive sell through of certain new products.
Net sales of Concord Europe for Fiscal 2002 were $26.2 million, a decrease of
$0.1 million, or 0.2% as compared to Fiscal 2001.
-19-
Gross Profit
Gross profit for Fiscal 2002 was $19.0 million, a decrease of $8.5 million, or
30.9% as compared to Fiscal 2001. Gross profit margin decreased to 14.7% for
Fiscal 2002 as compared to 15.3% for Fiscal 2001. The decrease in gross profit
margin was attributable to: (i) significantly lower net sales, (ii) a digital
inventory provision of $2.3 million, (iii) competitive price pressures and
unfavorable absorption of manufacturing overhead and labor utilization, (iv) a
provision of $1.0 million related to specific product inventory for Polaroid
which filed for bankruptcy in October 2001 and (v) higher product development
costs. Included in gross profit for Fiscal 2001 were $4.7 million of inventory
provisions and $0.5 million associated with a restructuring and cost containment
program ("Restructuring Initiative") that was initiated in June 2001. Product
development costs in dollars and as a percentage of net sales for Fiscal 2002
and 2001, included in the cost of products sold, were $7.6 million (5.9%) and
$6.4 million (3.6%), respectively.
Operating Expenses
Selling expenses decreased by $1.8 million, or 22.2%, to $6.3 million for Fiscal
2002 from $8.1 million for Fiscal 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a
significant decline in net sales resulting in lower freight and certain other
variable selling expenses, as well as a decrease in salaries, travel and
entertainment and tradeshow expenses. Selling expenses, as a percentage of net
sales, increased to 4.9% for Fiscal 2002 from 4.5% for Fiscal 2001.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $12.3 million, or 37.1%, to
$21.0 million for Fiscal 2002 from $33.3 million for Fiscal 2001. As a
percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 16.2%
for Fiscal 2002 from 18.5% for Fiscal 2001. Included in general and
administrative expenses for Fiscal 2002 were certain amounts aggregating $3.0
million comprised of (i) a provision related to an account receivable of $1.6
million associated with Polaroid's bankruptcy filing; (ii) a net provision
related to an account receivable of $0.7 million associated with Kmart's
bankruptcy filing in January 2002; (iii) a charitable contribution that the
Company made for victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in the
amount of $1.1 million; and (iv) a reversal in June 2002 of an accrual
associated with the Restructuring Initiative of $0.3 million which resulted in a
reduction of general and administrative expenses. The Restructuring Initiative
was completed in June 2002. In Fiscal 2001, general and administrative expenses
included a $15.8 million provision for doubtful accounts for an account
receivable associated with a former DMS customer. Also, as a result of the
Restructuring Initiative, general and administrative expenses included $0.9
million of the $1.4 million restructuring charge that the Company recorded in
its fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001.
Terminated acquisition costs of $0.8 million in Fiscal 2001 related to a
proposed acquisition that was not consummated. Negotiations regarding this
acquisition were terminated in September 2000.
Interest expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 9.7%, to $2.5 million for Fiscal
2002 from $2.8 million for Fiscal 2001. The lower interest expense in Fiscal
2002 was attributable to the decreased use of short-term borrowings and the
repayment of certain capital leases.
Other (Income), Net
Other (income), net was $(3.1) million and $(4.9) million for Fiscal 2002 and
Fiscal 2001, respectively. Other (income), net primarily includes investment
income, foreign exchange gains and losses, directors' fees, and certain public
relations costs. The decrease in Fiscal 2002 was primarily attributable to lower
investment income offset by $1.2 million of income from an arbitration award.
-20-
Income Taxes
Income tax (benefit) was $(1.4) million and $(0.9) million for Fiscal 2002 and
Fiscal 2001, respectively. The increase in the income tax (benefit) is primarily
due to the utilization of $1.1 million of European valuation allowances in
Fiscal 2002. See "Income Taxes" under the "Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002"
discussion for additional income tax information.
Net Loss
As a result of the matters described above, we reported a net loss of $(5.2)
million, or $(0.19) per share, for Fiscal 2002 as compared to a net loss of
$(11.8) million, or $(0.45) per share, for Fiscal 2001.
Foreign Currency Transactions
We operate on a worldwide basis and our results may be adversely or positively
affected by fluctuations of various foreign currencies against the U.S. Dollar,
specifically, the Canadian Dollar, European Euro, British Pound Sterling, PRC
Renminbi, Hong Kong Dollar and Japanese Yen. Our foreign subsidiaries purchase
the majority of their finished goods inventories in U.S. Dollars. Accordingly,
the U.S. Dollar is the functional currency. Certain net sales to our customers
and purchases of certain components and services are transacted in local
currency including Japanese Yen, thereby creating an exposure to fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates. The translation from the applicable currencies
to U.S. Dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using current exchange
rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts
using a weighted average exchange rate during the period. Gains or losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions and remeasurement are included in
"Other (income), net" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A recent SEC release requires us to disclose factors that are likely to affect
our liquidity trends. We are not aware of factors that are reasonably likely to
adversely affect liquidity trends, other than those factors summarized under the
caption "Risk Factors" in this report. We do not have, nor do we engage in,
transactions with any special purpose entities. We are not engaged in hedging
activities and had no forward exchange contracts outstanding at June 28, 2003.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into operating lease commitments,
purchase commitments and other contractual obligations. These transactions are
recognized in our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and are more fully discussed below.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
anticipated cash flow from operations, and amounts available under our credit
facilities provide sufficient liquidity and capital resources for our
anticipated short-term working capital and capital expenditure requirements as
well as our anticipated long-term working capital and capital expenditure
requirements for the foreseeable future.
Working Capital - At Fiscal 2003 year end, working capital was $121.1 million as
compared to Fiscal 2002 year end working capital of $128.4 million, a decline of
$7.3 million. Cash and investments decreased by $15.6 million from $103.9
million at June 29, 2002 to $88.3 million at June 28, 2003 primarily as the
result of the repurchase of the $15.0 million Senior Notes and payment of $5.8
million for fixed asset expenditures. These two uses of cash, totaling $20.8
million, were partially offset by a total of $5.5 million of positive cash flow
from operations and proceeds received from Common Stock issuance resulting from
stock option and warrant exercises. Accounts receivable and inventory increased
by $9.5 and $9.8 million, respectively, during Fiscal 2003 as a result of our
significant sales growth.
-21-
Cash Provided by Operations - Cash provided by operations in Fiscal 2003 was
$5.0 million, which compared favorably to cash used in operations of $(1.1)
million for Fiscal 2002 and favorably to cash used in operations of $(3.4)
million for Fiscal 2001. The changes in cash provided by operating activities
for the respective Fiscal Years were primarily attributable to net income and
changes in accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable.
Cash Used in Investing Activities - Capital expenditures for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal
2002 and Fiscal 2001 were $5.8 million, $2.1 million, and $7.5 million,
respectively, and related primarily to expenditures on plant and equipment
purchased for our manufacturing facilities in the PRC. The increase in Fiscal
2003 was primarily the result of higher expenditures on plant and equipment
purchases primarily related to digital camera production at our manufacturing
facilities in the PRC. We anticipate capital expenditures will increase
substantially in Fiscal 2004 due to increased investments in plant and equipment
at our manufacturing facilities in the PRC in anticipation of increased revenue,
as well as investment in a new Enterprise Resource Planning software package for
worldwide operations. For Fiscal 2003, the decrease in cash from investing
activities related to certain short-term investments made in Fiscal 2003.
Cash Used in Financing Activities - Cash used in financing activities in Fiscal
2003 was $14.4 million. This resulted from the repayment of the Senior Notes
partially offset by proceeds received from Common Stock issuances resulting from
stock option and warrant exercises. Cash used in financing activities in Fiscal
2002 was $0.2 million, which was primarily attributable to repayments of capital
lease obligations. In Fiscal 2001, cash provided by financing activities of
$93.9 million was primarily attributable to our public equity offering
(described more fully below) in the Fall of 2000.
Operating Leases - We entered into operating leases in the ordinary course of
business (e.g., warehouse facilities, office space and equipment) where the
economic profile was favorable. The effects of outstanding leases are not
material to us in terms of either annual cash flow or total future minimum
payments. See Note 15, "Commitments and Contingencies," in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Purchase Commitments - As part of the ordinary course of our business, we enter
into and have purchase commitments for materials, supplies, services, and
property, plant and equipment. In the aggregate, such commitments are not at
prices in excess of current market and typically do not exceed one year.
Related Party Transactions - We engaged in related party transactions as
discussed in Note 17, "Related Party Transactions," in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. These transactions do not materially affect our results of
operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Other Contractual Obligations - We do not have any material financial guarantees
or other contractual commitments that are reasonably likely to adversely affect
liquidity. See Hong Kong Financing Facilities below for information about our
financial guarantees.
Hong Kong Financing Facilities - Concord HK has various financing and revolving
credit facilities in place providing an aggregate of approximately $23.5 million
in borrowing capacity. Certain of the revolving credit facilities are
denominated in Hong Kong Dollars. Since 1983 the Hong Kong Dollar has been
pegged to the United States Dollar. The revolving credit facilities are
comprised of 1) an approximately $11.0 million Import Facility, 2) an
approximately $2.6 million Packing Credit and Export Facility, 3) an
approximately $1.9 million Foreign Exchange Facility and 4) an $8.0 million
Accounts Receivable Financing Facility (collectively the "Hong Kong Financing
Facilities"). The $8.0 million Accounts Receivable Financing Facility is secured
by certain accounts receivable of Concord HK and guaranteed by us. We also
guarantee the remaining amount of approximately $15.5 million under the Hong
Kong Financing Facilities. Availability under the Accounts Receivable Financing
Facility is subject to advance formulas based on Eligible Accounts Receivable
and all the credit facilities are subject to certain financial ratios and
covenants. The Hong Kong Financing Facilities bear interest at variable rates.
At June 28, 2003, there were no amounts outstanding under the Hong Kong
Financing Facilities.
-22-
United Kingdom Credit Facility - In November 1999, our United Kingdom subsidiary
obtained a United Kingdom credit facility (the "UK Facility") that was secured
by substantially all of our United Kingdom subsidiary's assets. The UK Facility
bore interest at 1.5% above the UK prime lending rate and was principally
utilized for working capital needs and allowed borrowings of up to approximately
$1.2 million. At June 28, 2003, there were no amounts outstanding under the UK
Facility. The facility expired in August 2003.
Exchange Offer - On August 28, 2001, we launched an offer to exchange
outstanding stock options that had an exercise price of more than $7.00 per
share for new options to purchase 75% of the shares subject to the outstanding
options at an exercise price of $5.97 per share (the closing price of the Common
Stock reported on the Nasdaq National Market on the date the Board of Directors
approved the exchange offer). The exchange offer expired on October 16, 2001. We
accepted for exchange and cancelled options to purchase a total of 1,375,876
shares of Common Stock and issued new options to purchase a total of 1,031,908
shares of Common Stock in exchange for the cancelled options. As a result of the
exchange offer, we are now required to apply variable accounting to these new
stock options until the options are exercised, cancelled or expired. For Fiscal
2003, we recorded $0.9 million of variable stock-based compensation expense in
the consolidated statement of operations because our Common Stock price on June
28, 2003 was above the exercise price of $5.97. For Fiscal 2002, we did not
record any variable stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated
statements of operations because the Company's stock price on June 29, 2002 was
below the exercise price of $5.97. Because the determination of variable
accounting expense associated with the repriced stock options is dependent, in
part, on our closing stock price at the end of each prospective reporting
period, it is not possible to determine its future impact, either favorable or
unfavorable, on our financial statements.
Common Stock Buy-Back Programs - In Fiscal 2000, we purchased 190,888 shares of
our Common Stock on the open market for $0.8 million as part of a Board of
Directors (the "Board") approved Common Stock buy-back program. In February
2001, we adopted an additional share repurchase program pursuant to which the
Board allocated up to $10.0 million for the repurchase of shares of our Common
Stock. We have not repurchased any shares pending completion of a review of our
other capital investment opportunities.
Public Equity Offering - On September 26, 2000, pursuant to an underwritten
public offering, we sold 3.9 million shares of our Common Stock at $23.00 per
share. On October 2, 2000, pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the
underwriters, we sold an additional 585,000 shares of our Common Stock at a
price of $23.00 per share. We received net proceeds of $96.9 million from the
offering, after deducting offering costs and underwriting fees of $6.3 million
from the gross proceeds of $103.2 million. The use of the offering proceeds was
intended for the repayment of outstanding indebtedness including capital leases,
for capital expenditures and for general corporate and strategic purposes,
including working capital and investments in new technologies, product lines and
complementary businesses.
Stock Split - On April 14, 2000, we effected a two-for-one stock split of our
Common Stock through a stock dividend to shareholders of record on March 27,
2000. Accordingly, share and per-share data for all periods presented in this
report have been restated to reflect the stock split.
Senior Notes - On July 30, 1998, we consummated a private placement of $15.0
million of unsecured Senior Notes that bore interest at 11%. In August 2002, we
repurchased all of these Senior Notes at slightly below par.
License Agreement - On August 26, 2002, we entered into our two Polaroid
licensing agreements. The two license agreements provide for the exclusive (with
the exception of products already released by Polaroid into the distribution
chain) worldwide use of the Polaroid brand trademark in connection with the
manufacture, distribution, promotion and sale of single-use cameras and
traditional film based cameras, including zoom cameras, and certain related
accessories. The licenses do not include instant or digital cameras. Each
license includes an initial term of three and a half years and may be renewed,
at our option, for an additional three-year period. Each license agreement
includes provisions for the payment of $3.0 million of minimum royalties, which
will be fully credited against percentage royalties. Through August 2003, we
have paid a total of $5.0 million, which represented $2.5 million for each
license agreement, as partial payment of the minimum royalties.
-23-
Litigation Settlements - On July 24, 2003, the Company entered into a settlement
agreement to dismiss a patent infringement complaint filed by the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and Electronic for Imaging, Inc. against the Company and
to release the Company from any and all claims of infringement of the patent at
issue. The Company recorded the settlement amount under the caption "Accrued
Expenses" in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 28, 2003. The settlement
is not material and does not have a material adverse effect on our financial
position or results of operations.
Growth Opportunities - We are evaluating various growth opportunities that could
require significant funding commitments. We have from time to time held, and
will continue to hold, discussions and negotiations with (i) companies that
represent potential acquisition or investment opportunities, (ii) potential
strategic and financial investors who have expressed an interest in making an
investment in or acquiring us, (iii) potential joint venture partners looking
toward formation of strategic alliances that would broaden our product base or
enable us to enter new lines of business and (iv) potential new and existing DMS
customers where the design, development and production of new products,
including certain new technologies, would enable us to expand our existing
business, and enter new markets including new ventures focusing on wireless
connectivity and other new communication technologies. However, there can be no
assurance that any definitive agreement will be reached regarding any of the
foregoing, nor does management believe that such agreements are necessary for
the successful implementation of our strategic plans.
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks regarding our Company. These
and other risks could materially and adversely affect our business, operating
results or financial condition. You should also refer to the other information
contained or incorporated by reference in this report.
Most of our operations in the People's Republic of China (PRC) are subject to
administration of its local governmental agencies.
The continuing viability of our PRC agreements is crucial to our business
operations in the PRC. We manufacture a majority of the components used in our
cameras and assemble all of our manufactured finished products in the PRC. We
currently have approximately 6,200 workers in the PRC either employed by our PRC
subsidiaries or through our agreements with various PRC government or
quasi-government agencies. We are responsible for their wages and housing and
must comply with a variety of local labor and employee benefit laws covering
these workers. While we believe we are in substantial compliance with applicable
laws as currently enforced, these laws are subject to modification and
interpretation by the applicable local governmental authorities. We cannot
predict the impact of any future modifications to or strict enforcement of the
existing laws. In addition, the termination or material modification of any of
our agreements with the PRC quasi-government agencies could have a material
adverse impact on our revenues and earnings.
We are exposed to political, economic and other risks that arise from operating
a multinational business.
We have significant operations outside the United States. We currently have
operations in Hong Kong, the PRC, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and
Germany. Further, we obtain raw materials, components and finished goods from
foreign suppliers. Accordingly, our business is subject to the political,
economic and other risks that are inherent in operating in foreign countries.
These risks include:
o the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting receivables
through foreign legal systems;
o trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
o the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or other restrictions;
-24-
o difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations and the
application of foreign labor regulations;
o required compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations;
and
o changes in the general political and economic conditions in the
countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets.
Our business success depends in part on our ability to successfully anticipate
and effectively manage these and other risks. No assurance can be given that
such risks will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Political and economic uncertainties in the PRC could affect our business.
Our business could be adversely affected by the imposition in the PRC of
austerity measures intended to reduce inflation, which could result in the
inadequate development or maintenance of infrastructure, the unavailability of
adequate power and water supplies, transportation, raw material and parts, or a
deterioration of the general political, economic or social environment in the
PRC.
Relocation time and expenses could result in substantial losses.
If we determine it is necessary to relocate our manufacturing facilities from
the PRC, due to confiscation, expropriation, nationalization, embargoes, or
other governmental restrictions, we would incur substantial operating and
capital losses including losses resulting from business interruption and delays
in production. In addition, as a result of a relocation of our manufacturing
equipment and other assets, we may incur relatively higher manufacturing costs,
which could reduce sales and decrease the current margin on the products we
previously manufactured in the PRC. Relocation of our manufacturing operations
would also result in disruption in the delivery of our products, which could, in
turn, reduce demand for our products in the future.
We are dependent on certain large customers.
In Fiscal 2003, we had three customers (Wal-Mart, Walgreens and Kodak) each of
whose purchases represented in excess of 10% of our total net sales and whose
purchases in the aggregate represented over 51% of our total net sales. The loss
of any of our large customers could have a material adverse impact on our
revenues and profits.
Digital camera products are subject to rapid technological changes, price
erosion and obsolescence.
Digital camera products are subject to rapid technological changes, price
erosion and obsolescence to a greater extent than traditional and single use
camera products. Because of rapid technological changes, some of our digital
camera products became obsolete and, consequently, we recorded significant lower
of cost or market value adjustments related to digital inventory during Fiscal
2002. Average selling prices for our products decline over relatively short time
periods. Many of our manufacturing costs are fixed. When our average selling
prices decline, our revenues decline unless we sell more units, and our gross
margins decline unless we are able to reduce our product costs by a commensurate
amount. Our operating results suffer when gross margins decline. To be
successful in the development, manufacture and sale of digital camera products,
we have to react quickly to technological advances and manage our inventory
effectively to accommodate price competition and the short life span of such
products.
Our digital camera products involve a more complex development process, which we
may not be able to successfully integrate into our operations, and we are
dependent upon the continued availability of products and key components.
Digital cameras involve a more complex development process and component
procurement process than our traditional and single use cameras. Manufacturing
delays, including component procurement delays or shortages and the timely
introduction and delivery of new components and products, which may be outside
our control, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and
financial condition. Any disruption in the availability of key components or our
suppliers' ability to deliver quality components and products in time to meet
critical manufacturing and distribution schedules could negatively impact our
ability to achieve our growth and sales objectives. We may occasionally
experience a short supply of certain component parts as a result of strong
demand in the industry for those parts or problems experienced by suppliers. If
shortages or delays persist, the price of these components may increase, we may
be exposed to product quality issues or the components may not be available at
all. We may not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of
acceptable quality to build new products in a timely manner in the quantities
needed. Accordingly, our revenue and gross margins and market share could suffer
until other sources can be developed.
-25-
We are exposed to risks associated with intellectual property used in image
capture devices.
Image capture devices use technology which may be protected by United States or
foreign patents. The right to use such intellectual property is subject to the
availability of licenses from the patent holders. If licenses are not available
or are only available on onerous terms, the Company's business could be
materially and adversely affected. In addition, the defense of patent
infringement claims could be time consuming and costly.
From time to time the Company receives patent infringement claims which it
analyzes and, if appropriate, may either take action to avoid infringement or
negotiate a license. In at least two such cases, one of which involves one of
the Company's largest customers, the Company is engaged in discussions looking
toward licensing of certain digital image capture technology.
We face a risk of business interruption as a result of political events in Hong
Kong and the PRC.
We conduct a substantial part of our business in Hong Kong and the PRC, such as
manufacturing, administration, sales, engineering and design. In July 1997, the
exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred from the United Kingdom
to the PRC and Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region of the PRC. We
cannot predict how the PRC will interpret and implement the basic law that
provides, in part, for the capitalist system and way of life to remain unchanged
for 50 years. We also cannot predict the effect of any such action on our
business activities in Hong Kong or the PRC, or on our operations or financial
condition in general. Any significant changes affecting our operations or
financial condition in Hong Kong or the PRC could have a material adverse effect
on our business and financial condition.
We are exposed to credit risk associated with sales to our customers.
The Company sells a significant number of its products to a relatively small
number of customers. Receivables arising from these sales are generally not
collateralized. The Company monitors the credit worthiness of its customers and
reviews outstanding receivable balances for collectibility on a regular basis
and records provisions for doubtful accounts as necessary. In the past we have
had customers file for protection from their creditors under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, we have recognized provisions related to
accounts receivable and inventory. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above.
-26-
We are dependent on a small group of key personnel.
Our business is managed by a small number of key management and operating
personnel. In particular, we rely on the continued services of Ira B. Lampert,
our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. The loss of his or any
other key employee services could have a material adverse impact on our
business. We believe our future success will depend in large part on our
continued ability to attract highly skilled and qualified personnel. Competition
for such personnel is intense. We may not be able to hire the necessary
personnel to implement our business strategy, or we may need to pay higher
compensation for employees than currently budgeted. Our inability to attract and
retain such personnel could limit our growth and affect our profits.
The camera and photographic products industry is highly competitive.
As a manufacturer and distributor of low cost, popularly priced image capture
products, we encounter substantial competition from a number of firms, many of
which have longer operating histories, more established markets, more extensive
facilities and, in some cases, greater resources.
To achieve our operating and financial objectives, we must manage our
anticipated growth effectively.
We anticipate that our business will continue to grow. Our future success
depends in large part on our ability to manage our anticipated growth. To manage
this growth, we will need to hire additional experienced, skilled personnel and
to train, manage and retain key employees. These activities may strain our
management resources. If we were unable to manage growth effectively, our
profits would be adversely affected.
We face certain foreign currency risks as a result of conducting a substantial
portion of our business activities in Hong Kong and the PRC.
Since 1983 and 1998 the Hong Kong Dollar and the PRC Renminbi, respectively,
have been pegged to the United States Dollar, but the exchange rate of these
currencies may fluctuate in the future. Although our DMS and major retail
business is conducted in U.S. Dollars, certain of our obligations under
agreements in the PRC and with our Hong Kong suppliers are paid in Hong Kong
Dollars and PRC Renminbi. There is increasing international pressure on the PRC
to appreciate its currency. We are also exposed to currency risks in Japan and
other countries where we purchase materials for our products or sell those
products. If there is a significant devaluation of the currency in a specific
country, the prices of our products will increase relative to that country's
currency and our products may be less competitive in that country. Also, if our
international customers become unwilling to place orders denominated in U.S.
Dollars, our revenue and operating results will be subject to foreign exchange
fluctuations. We generally do not engage in currency hedging activities.
We are unable to predict the effect of terrorist acts on commerce.
Terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. in September of 2001 have
disrupted commerce throughout the United States and other parts of the world.
The continued threat of terrorism within the United States and abroad and the
potential for continued military action and heightened security measures in
response to such threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout
the world. To the extent that such disruptions result in delays or cancellations
of customer orders, a general decrease in consumer spending, or our inability to
effectively market and sell our products, our business and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected. We are unable to predict whether the
threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long-term
commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have a long-term
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
-27-
Our future tax rates could increase.
A number of factors will affect our tax rate in the future, and the combined
effect of these factors could result in an increase in our effective tax rate as
compared to our effective tax rate in Fiscal 2003. This would adversely affect
our net income. We operate in different countries that have different income tax
rates. Based upon our apportionment of income, our effective tax rate could
fluctuate. A key factor that could cause our tax rate to increase would be
increasing the valuation allowance offsetting part, or all, of our net deferred
tax assets. Changes in tax laws in the United States may further limit our
ability to utilize our net operating losses. Any further limitation on our
ability to utilize our net operating losses could adversely affect our operating
results.
The implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system presents certain
risks.
In July 2003, we began implementing a new Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP,
system which will become an important element of the Company's accounting,
financial and operating functions. There are significant costs associated with
implementing the new ERP system, in terms of both financial outlay and the human
resources to be incurred and expended in connection with its implementation. In
addition, there are certain risks associated with the related conversion to a
new computer system, including a potential disruption in our accounting and
operational controls and the possibility of problems associated with the
conversion of electronic data. If these issues are not properly and adequately
addressed, it could result in the diversion of management's and other
personnel's attention and resources, and could materially adversely affect our
operating results and impact our ability to manage our business and anticipated
growth.
The importation of products into the United States and other countries in which
our products are sold is subject to various other risks.
The United States, the PRC, Hong Kong, the European Union or other countries may
impose trade restrictions that could adversely affect our operations. In
addition, the United States is currently monitoring various PRC practices,
including trade, investment and government procurement, as well as the PRC's
compliance with various multilateral and bilateral agreements. We cannot predict
whether the United States will take future trade actions against the PRC that
may result in increased tariffs against PRC products, including products
imported by us.
Our operations may be impaired as a result of disasters, business interruptions
or similar events, including the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome.
Disasters such as earthquakes, water, fire, electricity failure, or accidents
affecting our operating activities, major facilities, and employees'/customers'
health could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial
condition. In particular, our operations in the PRC, as well as most of our
third party manufacturers and service providers involved in the manufacturing of
our products, are located within a relatively close proximity of one another in
the PRC. Therefore, any disaster that strikes within close proximity of that
geographic area could be exceedingly disruptive to our business and could
materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
We do not currently have a disaster recovery plan.
-28-
In the event of another outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS,
our facilities and/or the facilities of our third party manufacturers and
service providers located in Hong Kong, the PRC and other parts of Southeast
Asia could be quarantined or temporarily closed. If this occurs, it could delay
or prevent us from developing new products or manufacturing, testing or shipping
our current products, and may require us to find other providers of such
services, which may be unavailable or more expensive. Further, if a SARS
outbreak has an adverse impact on the businesses of our customers, it could
reduce the size and/or frequency of our customers' purchases, which could
adversely impact our operating results.
We may not be able to identify and integrate future acquisitions.
We intend to pursue strategic acquisitions that we consider reasonable in light
of the revenues and profits we believe we will be able to generate from these
acquisitions. The cost of acquisitions within the industry has generally
increased over time. Additionally, we compete for acquisitions with certain
other industry competitors, some of which have greater financial and other
resources than we do. Increased demand for acquisitions may result in fewer
acquisition opportunities for us as well as higher acquisition prices. Although
we believe opportunities may exist for us to grow through acquisitions, we may
not be able to identify and consummate acquisitions on acceptable terms. If we
do acquire other companies, we may not be able to profitably manage and
successfully integrate them with our operations and sales and marketing efforts
without substantial costs or delays. Acquisitions involve a number of potential
risks, including the potential loss of customers, increased leverage and debt
service requirements, combining disparate company cultures and facilities and
operating in geographically diverse markets. One or more of our future
acquisitions may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
The market price of our Common Stock may fluctuate.
The stock markets, and in particular the Nasdaq National Market, have
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market
prices of equity securities of many companies and that often have been unrelated
or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These broad
market factors may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In the
past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's
securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against
that company. Such a lawsuit has been instituted against us and could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which
could harm our business. See "Legal Proceedings."
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
As a result of our global operating and financial activities, we are exposed to
changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates that may adversely
affect our results of operations and financial position. In seeking to minimize
the risks and/or costs associated with such activities, we manage exposures to
changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates through our
regular operating and financing activities.
At June 28, 2003, our exposure to changes in interest rates was minimal, since
we had no long-term or short-term debt outstanding. Since we have no debt
outstanding, we do not deem interest rate risk to be significant or material to
our financial position or results of operations. We do not presently use
derivative instruments to adjust our interest rate risk profile. We do not
utilize financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we
utilize leveraged financial instruments.
Each of our foreign subsidiaries purchases their inventories in U.S. Dollars and
certain of their sales are in foreign currency, thereby creating an exposure to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We purchase certain components,
raw materials and services needed to manufacture our products in foreign
currencies including Japanese Yen. The impact of foreign exchange transactions
is reflected in our statements of operations. As of June 28, 2003, we were not
engaged in any hedging activities and we had no forward exchange contracts
outstanding. We continue to analyze the benefits and costs associated with
hedging against foreign currency fluctuations.
-29-
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The financial statements listed in Item 15(a)(1) and (2) are included in the
report beginning on page F-2.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
CEO and CFO Certifications. The certifications of the CEO and the CFO required
by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Certifications") are filed as exhibits to this report. This section of the
report contains the information concerning the evaluation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) ("Disclosure Controls") and changes to internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
("Internal Controls") referred to in the Certifications and this information
should be read in conjunction with the Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Company's management,
including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does
not expect that the Company's Disclosure Controls or Internal Controls will
prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the limitations in any and
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have
been detected. Further, the design of any control system is based in part upon
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Because of these inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls. Based on our management's evaluation (with
the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our
Disclosure Controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving
their objectives and, at the "reasonable assurance" level, are effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file
or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls. There was no change in our Internal Controls
during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our Internal Controls.
-30-
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company.
Executive Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors (and their respective ages as of August 31,
2003) are as follows:
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Ira B. Lampert(3)(4) 58 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Gerald J. Angeli 50 Vice President of Worldwide Engineering and Technology
Richard M. Finkbeiner 57 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Brian F. King 50 Senior Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Keith L. Lampert 33 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Joseph Leonardo 57 Vice President and Director of Operations for the
Company and Managing Director of Concord HK
Harlan I. Press 39 Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Alan Schutzman 47 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Urs W. Stampfli 52 Senior Vice President and Director of Global Sales and Marketing
David M. Wand 48 Vice President and Director of Worldwide Supply Chain
Ronald S. Cooper(1)(2) 65 Director
Morris H. Gindi(1)(5) 58 Director
J. David Hakman(3)(4) 61 Director
William J. O'Neill, Jr.(1)(2) 61 Director
-------------
(1) Member of Audit Committee.
(2) Member of Compensation and Stock Option Committee.
(3) Member of Executive Committee.
(4) Member of Director Affairs Committee.
(5) Member of Marketing and Product Development Committee.
Ira B. Lampert has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since July 13, 1994. For the calendar year 1995 and again from July 31, 1998
through the present, Mr. Lampert also served as President of the Company. Mr.
Lampert is a member of the Queens College Foundation Board of Trustees (Queens
College is part of the City University system of New York), is a member of the
Advisory Board of the Boys & Girls Republic, a nonprofit organization for
underprivileged children, and serves on the Boards of Trustees of the Mount
Sinai Medical Center Foundation, Inc. and the Mount Sinai Medical Center of
Florida, Inc.
Gerald J. Angeli joined the Company in April 2000 as Vice President, DMS Product
Supply. Since March 2001, he has served as the Company's Vice President of
Worldwide Engineering and Technology. From July 1997 to April 2000, Mr. Angeli
was Vice President, Global Manufacturing and Products Supply for NCR
Corporation's Systemedia Group, where he was responsible for manufacturing,
customer service, distribution and logistics. Before that, Mr. Angeli was
employed by Kodak for 20 years in various capacities, most recently as Manager
of Worldwide Manufacturing and Supply Chain and Vice President, Consumer
Imaging.
Richard M. Finkbeiner joined the Company in July 2002 as Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Finkbeiner was
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Menasha Corporation, a
$1 billion privately owned manufacturing and services company. He was Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Creative Computers, Inc., a
publicly-traded reseller of computer equipment, from 1996 until he joined
Menasha in 1998. Mr. Finkbeiner has been Chief Financial Officer for several
other companies and spent 12 years with Hallmark Cards. He has an M.S. degree in
Applied Math, an M.B.A., and a C.P.A. certificate.
-31-
Brian F. King has been Senior Executive Vice President of the Company since
February 2002 and an Assistant Secretary of the Company since September 15,
2003. Mr. King served as Senior Vice President of the Company from August 1998
to February 2002 and as Chief Operating Officer from February 2002 to December
2002. In addition, he served as Secretary of the Company from August 1996 to
September 14, 2003, and served as Managing Director of Concord HK from August
1996 through April 2000. Mr. King served as the Company's Vice President of
Corporate and Strategic Development from June 1996 to August 1998.
Keith L. Lampert, who is a son of Ira B. Lampert, has been Executive Vice
President since February 2002 and Chief Operating Officer since January 1, 2003.
From February 2002 until January 2003, he also served as the Company's Director
of Worldwide Operations and was Managing Director of Concord HK from April 2000
until December 2002. From March 2001 to February 2002, Mr. Lampert also served
as the Company's Vice President of Worldwide Operations. He became a Vice
President of the Company in August 1998, having joined the Company in 1993.
Among other things, Mr. Lampert is responsible for the Company's operations in
Hong Kong and the People's Republic of China.
Joseph Leonardo has been Vice President and Director of Operations for the
Company and Managing Director of Concord HK since January 1, 2003. Mr. Leonardo
was Vice President and Director of Manufacturing Operations for the Company and
Deputy Managing Director of Concord HK from February 2002 to December 2002,
having served as Vice President and Director of Operations for Concord HK since
January 2001. From January 1998 to January 2001, Mr. Leonardo was the Company's
Director of Manufacturing. Prior to joining the Company, he was Vice President
of Manufacturing for MicroE, Inc. from February 1996 to November 1997. Mr.
Leonardo has over 30 years of experience in manufacturing, having held
manufacturing-related management positions at companies such as Polaroid and
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
Harlan I. Press has been Vice President and Treasurer since April 2000, Chief
Accounting Officer since November 1994, and Assistant Secretary of the Company
since October 1996. Mr. Press served as the Corporate Controller of the Company
from October 1996 through April 2000. Mr. Press is a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the New York State Society of
Certified Public Accountants and the Financial Executives Institute.
Alan Schutzman joined the Company on September 15, 2003 as Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary. From January 2001 until joining the
Company, Mr. Schutzman was Associate General Counsel of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.
("Jacuzzi"), and Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Jacuzzi since
September 2001. From July 1996 to December 2000, he served as Vice President and
General Counsel of various operating subsidiaries of Jacuzzi, including Ames
True Temper and Keller Ladders, Inc.
Urs W. Stampfli has been Senior Vice President since February 2002 and Director
of Global Sales and Marketing for the Company since April 2000. Mr. Stampfli
joined the Company in May 1998, as Director of Global Sales and Marketing, and
became a Vice President of the Company in April 2000. From 1990 to April 1998,
Mr. Stampfli was Vice President, Marketing, Photo Imaging Systems of Agfa
Division, Bayer Corporation.
David M. Wand has been Vice President and Director of Worldwide Supply Chain for
the Company since February 2002, having served as Vice President and Director of
Worldwide Supply Chain and Information Technology for the Company from February
2002 to March 2003. From January 1999 to February 2002, Mr. Wand was Concord
HK's Director of Supply Chain and Information Systems and from December 1996,
when Mr. Wand first joined the Company, until January 1999, he was Materials
Director of Supply Chain for Concord HK. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wand
was with Andersen Consulting for two years, and EDS for ten years, where he was
responsible for implementing reengineering projects associated with the supply
chain and information technology functions.
Ronald S. Cooper has been a director of the Company since January 2000. Mr.
Cooper is a co-founder and principal of LARC Strategic Concepts, LLC, a
consulting firm focusing on emerging growth companies. Mr. Cooper retired from
Ernst & Young LLP in September 1998, having joined the firm in 1962. He became a
partner in 1973 and was Managing Partner of the firm's Long Island office from
1985 until he retired.
-32-
Morris H. Gindi has been a director of the Company since 1988. Mr. Gindi has
served as the Chief Executive Officer of Notra Trading Inc., an import agent in
the home textiles industry, since 1983 and as Chief Executive Officer of Morgan
Home Fashions, a manufacturer and distributor of home textiles, since 1995.
These two businesses import and distribute merchandise to all levels of the
retail trade. Mr. Gindi's career in the home textiles industry has spanned four
decades.
J. David Hakman has been a director of the Company since 1993. Mr. Hakman owns
Hakman Capital Corporation, an investment and merchant banking concern, a
subsidiary of which is a member of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.
William J. O'Neill, Jr. has been a director of the Company since August 2001.
Mr. O'Neill is a founder and principal of O'Neill Group, Inc., a consulting firm
focused on developing business strategies, operational execution, financial
evaluations and fundraising activities. From 1969 to 1999, Mr. O'Neill held
various management positions at Polaroid Corporation, most recently as Executive
Vice President and President, Corporate Business Development. Since July 2001,
he has served as Dean of the Frank Sawyer School of Management at Suffolk
University in Boston, Massachusetts.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expertise
The Company has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in
accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the
Audit Committee are Ronald S. Cooper (Chairman), Morris H. Gindi and William J.
O'Neill, Jr.
The Board of Directors has determined that the Company has two "audit committee
financial experts" serving on its Audit Committee, as that term is defined in
Item 401(h)(2) of Regulation S-K, namely Ronald S. Cooper and William J.
O'Neill, Jr. Mr. Cooper has over 35 years of experience in the field of public
accounting, retiring in 1998 from Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. O'Neill was Chief
Financial Officer (and Executive Vice President) of Polaroid from 1990 to 1998,
having held various other positions with Polaroid including that of Corporate
Controller for four years. All of the members of the Audit Committee, including
Messrs. Cooper and O'Neill are independent, as that term is defined in Item
7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and
controller, as well as all other employees and the directors of the Company. The
Code of Ethics, which the Company calls its Code of Conduct, is posted on the
Company's website: www.concord-camera.com, on the Investor Relations page. The
Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 10 of Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its Code of Ethics
that applies to the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and that relates to any
element of the Code of Ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation
S-K, by posting such information on the aforementioned website.
-33-
Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), requires our directors, executive officers and ten percent (10%)
shareholders ("Reporting Persons") to file initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership of the Common Stock and any other equity
securities with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on a review of the copies
of the reports furnished to us and written representations from our directors
and executive officers that no other reports were required, with respect to
Fiscal 2003 we believe that the Reporting Persons timely complied with all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them, except that Keith Lampert
filed a late Form 4 for the stock option granted to him on November 11, 2002.
-34-
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table contains certain information regarding aggregate
compensation earned, paid or payable during Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal
2001 to the Chief Executive Officer and to each of the other four highest paid
executive officers for services rendered to the Company during these fiscal
years.
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards
----------------------------------------------- ------------------------
Other Shares
Annual Underlying LTIP All Other
Name and Fiscal Salary Bonus** Compensation Options Payouts*** Compensation
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ($)
------------------ -------- --------- --------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ------------
Ira B. Lampert 2003 $916,667 $424,834 $715,109(1) - $235,919 $982,595(7)
Chairman, Chief 2002 920,833 - 681,110(1) 263,004(6) - 960,447(7)
Executive Officer 2001 969,444 - 686,555(1) - - 961,524(7)
and President
Brian F. King 2003 425,000 212,417 28,000(2) - 117,959 376,952(8)
Senior Executive Vice 2002 400,000 - (7,177)(2) 127,260(6) - 375,372(8)
President 2001 425,000 - 132,970(2) - - 373,540(8)
Keith L. Lampert 2003 317,070 158,762 136,049(3) 100,000 76,674 402,555(9)
Executive Vice 2002 225,000 - 228,968(3) 76,356(6) - 233,973(9)
President and Chief 2001 240,000 - 214,908(3) - - 229,868(9)
Operating Officer
Urs W. Stampfli 2003 264,320 119,685 21,805(4) - 69,449 48,322(10)
Senior Vice President 2002 210,500 - 12,000(4) 18,665(6) - 44,276(10)
and Director of Global 2001 223,650 - 12,000(4) - - 44,647(10)
Sales and Marketing
Richard M. Finkbeiner* 2003 243,110 94,459 16,825(5) 75,000 - 13,643(11)
Senior Vice President and 2002 - - - - - -
Chief Financial Officer 2001 - - - - - -
-----------------
(*) Mr. Finkbeiner joined the Company in July 2002 (shortly after the
beginning of Fiscal 2003).
(**) For Fiscal 2003, represents bonuses awarded on August 6, 2003 under the
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan ("AICP") in effect for Fiscal 2003.
For Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, no bonuses were awarded under the AICP
in effect for those years.
(***) Represents payments received in September 2003 under awards approved on
August 6, 2003 under the Company's Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term
Cash Incentive Plan (the "LTCIP") in effect for the Fiscal 2002-2003
performance period. The preponderance of the LTCIP awards made to the
executives named above in the Summary Compensation Table for this
performance period was in the form of contingent deferred compensation
to be earned over the next three years and will be included in the
Summary Compensation Table, in the future, as and when the conditions
to vesting have been met and the amounts have been earned. See
"Executive Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change
in Control Arrangements" below.
-35-
(1) Includes: (a) auto allowances and costs, partial housing costs and
reimbursement of taxes, respectively, of $30,000, $48,000 and $120,911
in Fiscal 2003, $30,714, $48,000 and $93,789 in Fiscal 2002, and
$30,808, $47,797 and $99,325 in Fiscal 2001; (b) the yearly credit
under the Lampert SERP (described below under "Executive Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements") of $500,000 in Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001;
and (c) for Fiscal 2003, reimbursements under the Company's Flexible
Perquisite Spending Account Program for Key Executives.
(2) For Fiscal 2003, this represents $18,000 in auto allowance paid, and
reimbursements under the Company's Flexible Perquisite Spending Account
Program for Key Executives. For Fiscal 2002, this represents $18,000 in
auto allowance paid, less Hong Kong tax reimbursements of $25,177
repaid by Mr. King to the Company. For Fiscal 2001, this represents
$108,142 paid by the Company pursuant to the Company's Executive
Management Tax Equalization Policy for executives stationed overseas,
$18,000 in auto allowance, and $6,828 in overseas housing costs.
(3) Includes: (a) amounts paid pursuant to the Company's Executive
Management Tax Equalization Policy of $23,700 in Fiscal 2003, $89,519
in Fiscal 2002, and $102,518 in Fiscal 2001; (b) an overseas allowance
of $25,000 per annum for Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, $12,500 of which
was received for Fiscal 2003; (c) overseas housing costs of $84,599 in
Fiscal 2003, $111,826 in Fiscal 2002 and $82,969 in Fiscal 2001; and
(d) for Fiscal 2003, $5,250 in auto allowance paid, and reimbursements
under the Company's Flexible Perquisite Spending Account Program for
Key Executives.
(4) For Fiscal 2003, this represents $12,000 in auto allowance paid, and
reimbursements under the Company's Flexible Perquisite Spending Account
Program for Key Executives. For Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, this
represents auto allowances paid.
(5) Represents $6,825 in auto allowance paid, and reimbursements under the
Company's Flexible Perquisite Spending Account Program for Key
Executives.
(6) This stock option was granted on October 17, 2001 in connection with
the Company's exchange offer (described under "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" above),
in exchange for the stock option granted in Fiscal 2000 which has been
cancelled.
(7) Represents: (a) $516,666 of the April 19, 2000 grant of deferred
compensation that vested in each of these fiscal years (as described
under "Executive Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and
Change in Control Arrangements" below, this grant vested in three equal
annual installments beginning January 1, 2001); (b) payments by the
Company for insurance premiums of $37,939 in Fiscal 2003, $27,838 in
Fiscal 2002 and $39,975 in Fiscal 2001; (c) in Fiscal 2003 and 2002,
payments by the Company for companion travel; and (d) $404,883 repaid
to Ira B. Lampert in each of these fiscal years as deferred
compensation pursuant to the conditional release program (which, as
described under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below,
began in May 1999 and continued on January 1 each year through January
1, 2003) because he prepaid the total amount of the indebtedness before
it was scheduled to be forgiven by the Company.
(8) Represents: (a) the amount of the April 19, 2000 grant of deferred
compensation that vested in the fiscal year (as described under
"Executive Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change
in Control Arrangements" below, this grant vested in three equal annual
installments beginning January 1, 2001); (b) payments by the Company
for insurance premiums; and (c) $116,140, $122,714 and $121,152 repaid
to Brian F. King in Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001,
respectively, as deferred compensation pursuant to the conditional
release program (which, as described under "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions" below, began in May 1999 and continued on January
1 each year through January 1, 2003) because he prepaid the total
amount of the indebtedness before it was scheduled to be forgiven by
the Company.
(9) Represents: (a) the amount of the April 19, 2000 grant of deferred
compensation that vested in the fiscal year (as described under
"Executive Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change
in Control Arrangements" below, this grant vested in three equal annual
installments beginning January 1, 2001); (b) payments by the Company
for insurance premiums; (c) $78,857, $83,321 and $78,858 repaid to
Keith L. Lampert in Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001,
respectively, as deferred compensation pursuant to the conditional
release program (which, as described under "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions" below, began in May 1999 and continued on January
1 each year through January 1, 2003) because he prepaid the total
amount of the indebtedness before it was scheduled to be forgiven by
the Company; and (d) for Fiscal 2003, a one-time grant of $100,000 in
deferred compensation, a $58,333 relocation payment, and certain
housing benefits, all of which were received in connection with Mr.
Lampert's promotion to Chief Operating Officer and as an inducement to
his repatriation to the United States. See "Executive Employment
Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements" below.
(10) Represents the amount of the April 19, 2000 grant of deferred
compensation that vested in the fiscal year (as described under
"Executive Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change
in Control Arrangements" below, this grant vested in three equal annual
installments beginning January 1, 2001), and insurance premiums paid by
the Company.
(11) Represents certain housing benefits received by Mr. Finkbeiner in
connection with his relocation, and insurance premiums paid by the
Company.
-36-
Stock Options
The following table sets forth information concerning stock option grants made
during Fiscal 2003 to executive officers named in the "Summary Compensation
Table."
Stock Option Grants in Fiscal 2003
Potential Realizable
Value at Assumed
% of Total Annual Rates of Stock
Number of Options Exercise Price Appreciation
Shares Granted to Price for Option Term
Underlying Employees Per --------------------
Options in Share Expiration 5% 10%
Name Granted Fiscal 2003 ($) Date ($) ($)
---- --------- ----------- --- ---- --- ---
Keith L. Lampert 100,000(1) 20.2 $ 5.18 11/10/12 $325,767 $825,559
Richard M. Finkbeiner 75,000(2) 15.2 4.00 07/21/12 188,668 478,123
----------------
(1) This option is to vest in three equal annual installments on November 11th
of 2003, 2004 and 2005.
(2) This option vested as to 18,750 shares on July 22, 2003, with the balance
to vest as to 18,750 additional shares on July 22nd of 2004, 2005 and
2006.
The following table sets forth information concerning stock option exercises
during Fiscal 2003 by each of the executive officers named in the "Summary
Compensation Table" and the fiscal year-end value of unexercised options held by
such officers, based on the closing price of $6.92 for the Common Stock on June
27, 2003.
-37-
Aggregated Stock Option Exercises in Fiscal 2003
and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Shares Value of Unexercised
Acquired Value Number of Shares Underlying In-the-Money Options
on Realized Unexercised Options at FY End at FY End ($)
Name Exercise (#) ($) Exercisable** Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- ------------ -------- ------------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Ira B. Lampert - - 1,525,004 - $7,597,613 -
Brian F. King 191,666* $812,990* 322,260 - 1,202,172 -
Keith L. Lampert 145,000* 506,784* 216,356 100,000 858,263 $174,000
Urs W. Stampfli - - 78,665 - 267,932 -
Richard M. - - - 75,000 - 219,000
Finkbeiner
-----------------
* None of the shares acquired upon these exercises have been sold; the
executives exercised these options and held the shares so acquired.
** Certain of the stock options reflected in this table were exercised after
the end of Fiscal 2003: (i) Ira B. Lampert exercised options for 183,032
shares on June 30, 2003, and exercised another option for 387,000 shares on
July 14, 2003 and deferred the receipt of 331,011 of these shares until July
1, 2005 under the Company's Deferred Delivery Plan; (ii) Brian F. King
exercised options for 100,000 shares on August 20, 2003, and (iii) Urs W.
Stampfli exercised an option for 15,000 shares on August 28, 2003. All of
these exercises were reported in Form 4s filed with the SEC.
Executive Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements
The following is a summary of the employment agreements between the Company and
each of the executive officers named in the above Summary Compensation Table.
The employment agreements provide for each named executive to serve in the
respective capacities indicated in the Summary Compensation Table.
The employment agreement for Ira B. Lampert (the "Lampert Agreement") has a
four-year term that automatically extends each day, by one day, until one party
notifies the other that the term should not be further extended. The term of the
employment agreements for Keith L. Lampert and Urs W. Stampfli expire on January
1, 2006, unless renewed by mutual agreement of the parties, and may be
terminated by the Company on thirty (30) days' notice at any time or by the
executive after January 1, 2006. The term of the employment agreement for Brian
F. King expires on January 1, 2004, unless renewed by mutual agreement of the
parties, and may be terminated on thirty (30) days' notice by the Company at any
time or by the executive after January 1, 2004. The term of Richard M.
Finkbeiner's employment agreement automatically renews from year-to-year, and
may be terminated by either party on sixty (60) days' notice.
The employment agreements provide that the Company will pay Ira B. Lampert,
Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert and Richard M. Finkbeiner annual base salaries
of $900,000, $450,000, $350,000 and $262,500, respectively, effective as of
January 1, 2003, and an annual base salary of $250,000 to Urs W. Stampfli
effective as of July 1, 2003.
In connection with Keith L. Lampert's promotion to Chief Operating Officer, the
Board also granted him an option to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock at $5.18 per share (the closing price on the grant date of November
11, 2002) with vesting in equal installments over three years from the grant
date, approved a relocation package, and authorized a one-time grant, effective
as of January 1, 2003, of $100,000 in fully vested deferred compensation as an
inducement for his repatriation to the United States. Mr. Lampert was also
provided with housing at the Company's expense while he was on overseas
assignment and tax equalization in accordance with the Company's Executive
Management Tax Equalization Policy.
-38-
Pursuant to the employment agreement for Mr. Finkbeiner, he was also provided
with a relocation package and a one-time grant of $100,000 in deferred
compensation (described below under "Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for
Named Executive Officers").
The Lampert Agreement provides that if his employment with the Company is
terminated by reason of death or disability, Mr. Lampert, or his legal
representative, would be entitled to receive, in addition to accrued
compensation (including, without limitation, any earned but unpaid bonus or
long-term incentive awards, any amount of base salary accrued or earned but
unpaid, any deferred compensation earned but unpaid, any accrued but unused
vacation pay and unreimbursed business expenses (the "Accrued Amounts")), his
base salary for the scheduled balance of the term (payable in the case of death
in a lump sum), a prorated bonus for the year in which the death or disability
occurred, and any other or additional benefits owed to the executive under the
then applicable employee benefit plans or policies of the Company, subject in
the case of disability to offset against the base salary payment by the amount
of any disability benefits provided to him by the Company or under any
disability insurance provided by or paid for by the Company.
The Lampert Agreement entitles Ira B. Lampert to participate generally in all
pension, retirement, insurance, savings, welfare and other employee benefit
plans and arrangements and fringe benefits and perquisites maintained by the
Company from time to time for senior executives of a comparable level. In
addition to any life insurance provided pursuant to one of the Company's plans,
Mr. Lampert is also provided with term life insurance, for such beneficiaries as
are designated by Mr. Lampert, of $5 million face value, and long-term
disability coverage with a $600,000 annual benefit payable in the event that Mr.
Lampert's employment with the Company is terminated due to his disability (the
"Additional Life and Disability Insurance"). In addition, the Company may
purchase key man life insurance on the life of Mr. Lampert, which may be used to
satisfy the Company's obligations under the Lampert Agreement in the event of
Mr. Lampert's death. The Company currently maintains $5 million in key man life
insurance on the life of Mr. Lampert.
If Mr. Lampert's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or if
there is a constructive termination without cause, Mr. Lampert would be entitled
to receive the Accrued Amounts, his base salary and continuation of his benefits
(or the economic equivalent of such benefits), the Additional Life and
Disability Insurance and certain perquisites for the scheduled balance of the
term and for an additional twelve months thereafter, and a prorated bonus for
the year in which the termination occurred. If such termination followed a
change of control of the Company, Mr. Lampert would be entitled to receive the
salary continuation benefit as a lump sum payment without any discount and,
subject to limited exceptions, any benefits, including options, in which he is
not at such time fully vested would become fully vested and any options would
remain exercisable for the full stated term of the option. If the automatic
extensions of the term of the Lampert Agreement are discontinued at the request
of the Company and Mr. Lampert's employment is terminated upon expiration of the
term, Mr. Lampert would be entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts, his base
salary and continuation of his benefits (or the economic equivalent of such
benefits), the Additional Life and Disability Insurance and certain perquisites
for twelve months after the end of the term, and a prorated bonus for the year
in which the termination occurred. In addition, if the severance payments to Mr.
Lampert under the Lampert Agreement follow a change in control and, together
with other amounts paid to Mr. Lampert, exceed certain threshold amounts and are
determined to constitute a parachute payment (as defined in Section 280G(b)(2)
of the Internal Revenue Code), Mr. Lampert is to receive an additional amount to
cover the federal excise tax with respect thereto on a "grossed up" basis.
If Ira B. Lampert is terminated for cause, or he voluntarily resigns, he will
only receive the Accrued Amounts and benefits provided in benefit plans.
Under the employment agreements for Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert and Urs W.
Stampfli, if the Company terminates the executive's employment at any time
without cause, or if the executive terminates his employment after the stated
term of his employment agreement, the executive will be entitled to severance
payments equal to one year of the executive's then base salary plus his
automobile allowance, payable in installments in accordance with the normal
payroll schedule. Under Mr. Finkbeiner's employment agreement, if the Company
terminates his employment without cause, Mr. Finkbeiner will be entitled to
severance payments equal to twelve months' of his then base salary. The
employment agreement for Keith L. Lampert also provides that if his employment
were to be terminated by the Company without cause, or upon a change of control,
the stock option for 100,000 shares granted to Mr. Lampert on November 11, 2002
would automatically become exercisable in full.
-39-
The employment agreements of all of the executives named in the Summary
Compensation Table prohibit them from competing with the Company for one year
following the termination of their employment with the Company; however, if Ira
B. Lampert's employment is terminated without cause, the duration of his
non-compete covenants would extend throughout the period in which his base
salary and other benefits are continued if such period exceeds twelve months.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for Named Executive Officers
Pursuant to the Lampert Agreement, the Company adopted a supplemental executive
retirement plan and agreement (a "SERP") for the benefit of Ira B. Lampert (the
"Lampert SERP"). A specified amount, currently $500,000, is credited to the
Lampert SERP account each year. These yearly credits are 100% vested and not
subject to forfeiture.
Effective as of April 19, 2000, in connection with a one-time grant of deferred
compensation to certain executive officers, the Company adopted certain SERPs,
including those with respect to deferred compensation in the following amounts
for the following named executive officers (the "Executive SERPs"): (i) Brian F.
King, $750,000; (ii) Keith L. Lampert, $450,000; and (iii) Urs W. Stampfli,
$110,000. The amounts in the Executive SERP accounts vested in three equal
annual installments beginning January 1, 2001. The Company simultaneously
approved a one-time grant of deferred compensation to Ira B. Lampert in the
amount of $1,549,999 with the same vesting schedule as under the Executive
SERPs, and the Lampert SERP was amended to include appropriate terms to govern
this one-time grant of deferred compensation.
In connection with a one-time grant of $100,000 in deferred compensation to
Richard M. Finkbeiner as of July 22, 2002, the Company adopted a SERP for the
benefit of Mr. Finkbeiner. The amounts in these SERP accounts vest, so long as
Mr. Finkbeiner continues to be employed by the Company, in four equal annual
installments beginning July 22, 2003. However, if the Company terminates Mr.
Finkbeiner's employment without cause, half of each year's installment will
immediately become vested.
Each time the Company credits an executive's account under a SERP agreement, the
Company simultaneously contributes an equal amount to a trust established for
the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy the obligations incurred by the
Company pursuant to the SERP.
Deferred Long Term Compensation
On August 6, 2003, all of the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table were awarded the following amounts of contingent deferred
compensation, which is not yet earned or vested, under the Company's Amended and
Restated 2002 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (the "LTCIP") with respect to the
Fiscal 2002-2003 performance period (the "Deferred LTCIP Awards"): (i) Ira B.
Lampert, $670,474; (ii) Brian F. King, $335,237; (iii) Keith L. Lampert,
$389,629; (iv) Urs W. Stampfli, $274,021; and (v) Richard M. Finkbeiner,
$224,722. The Deferred LTCIP Awards to Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert, Urs W.
Stampfli and Richard M. Finkbeiner vest, so long as the executive continues to
be employed by the Company, in three equal annual installments on August 6,
2004, 2005 and 2006, or immediately upon: (i) a change of control of the
Company; or (ii) the executive's death or disability. The Deferred LTCIP Award
granted to Ira B. Lampert has substantially the same terms and conditions as the
other Deferred LTCIP Awards, however, in addition to the events that will
accelerate the vesting of the other Deferred LTCIP Awards, it provides for
immediate vesting in the event of termination without cause, a constructive
termination of employment without cause, or the non-renewal of his employment
contract. The Lampert SERP, the Executive SERPs and the Finkbeiner SERP are all
being amended to include appropriate terms to govern the Deferred LTCIP Awards.
Once the relevant SERPs have been amended, the Company will contribute the
foregoing amounts to trusts established for the purpose of holding funds to
satisfy the Company's obligations under the Deferred LTCIP Awards.
-40-
Director Compensation
During Fiscal 2003, each non-employee member of the Board was paid the
following: (i) an annual fee of $12,000 for serving on the Board, which fee,
having been voluntarily reduced from $15,000 to $12,000 effective as of the
beginning of Fiscal 2002, was increased back to $15,000 effective as of January
1, 2003; (ii) a $2,500 annual fee for each Board committee on which he served
($3,500 for serving as Chairman); and (iii) $1,000 for each Board or committee
meeting attended.
In addition, pursuant to the formula award provisions of the Company's 1993
Incentive Plan, as amended, prior to January 20, 2003 each non-employee director
automatically received the following options to purchase shares of the Common
Stock. Upon appointment to the Board, each non-employee director received: (i)
an option to purchase up to 40,000 shares, vesting as to 8,000 shares on the
following January 1 and on each January 1 thereafter (provided that, if a
director fails to attend at least 75% of the Board meetings in any calendar
year, then the options that would have vested on the next January 1 are
forfeited); and (ii) an immediately exercisable option to purchase 13,000
shares. On each anniversary of his appointment, each non-employee director
received another immediately exercisable option to purchase 13,000 shares. All
of the foregoing options have an exercise price equal to the closing price of
the Common Stock on the date of grant and expire on the earlier of: (i) five
years from the grant date; or (ii) one year after the recipient ceases to be a
member of the Board. On January 20, 2003, the 1993 Incentive Plan was amended to
remove the provisions regarding formula awards to non-employee directors and, in
lieu of the anniversary grant that would have been received in 2003, each
non-employee director was granted an option to purchase 26,000 shares of Common
Stock at an exercise price of $5.52 per share. The foregoing options were
immediately exercisable as to 13,000 shares and will vest as to the remaining
13,000 shares on January 20, 2004 provided the director continues to serve on
the Board.
Effective July 31, 2003, the Company amended the outstanding options held by a
former director to permit such options to be exercised until their stated
expiration date, and to permit the continued vesting through January 2005 of
12,000 shares subject to one such option, in light of the valuable years of
advice and service that had been provided during his tenure as a member of the
Board. The foregoing amendments did not apply to the installment of 13,000
shares which would have vested on January 20, 2004 under the grant made to him
on January 20, 2003, which installment was forfeited.
-41-
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth certain information as of August 1, 2003 about
the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by: (i) each person or group who we
know beneficially owns more than 5% of our Common Stock; (ii) each director;
(iii) each executive officer named in the "Summary Compensation Table"; and (iv)
all directors and executive officers as a group:
Amount and Nature of Percent
Name of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership(1) of Class(1)
------------------------ ----------------------- -----------
(i) Beneficial Owners of More than 5% of the Common Stock
Awad Asset Management, Inc. 3,572,340(2) 12.7%
250 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10177
"MEP Group" of Company Officers or 3,157,645(3) 10.7%
Employees as described in note (3) below
Prudential Financial, Inc. 1,404,128(2) 5.0%
751 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
(ii) Directors
Ira B. Lampert 2,009,715(3)(4) 6.9%
Ronald S. Cooper 76,500(5) *
Morris H. Gindi 82,500(6) *
J. David Hakman 422,000(7) 1.5%
William J. O'Neill, Jr. 55,000(8) *
(iii) Named Executive Officers
Brian F. King 513,926(3)(9) 1.8%
Keith L. Lampert 426,356(3)(10) 1.5%
Urs W. Stampfli 88,665(11) *
Richard M. Finkbeiner 18,750(12) *
(iv) All executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons) 4,081,592 13.5%
--------------------
* Indicates less than one percent (1%).
(1) For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership was determined in
accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act based upon information
furnished by the persons listed or contained in filings made by them with
the SEC; the inclusion of shares as beneficially owned should not be
construed as an admission that such shares are beneficially owned for
purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. As of August 1, 2003, the
Company had 28,018,542 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. All
shares were owned directly with sole voting and investment power unless
otherwise indicated. (2) Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A
dated February 11, 2003 filed by Prudential Financial, Inc., and a Schedule
13G/A dated February 3, 2003 filed by Awad Asset Management, Inc., as to
their beneficial ownership at December 31, 2002.
-42-
(3) As of August 1, 2003, a group comprised of five officers or employees of
the Company (Messrs. Ira B. Lampert, Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert,
Harlan I. Press and Arthur Zawodny) (collectively, the "MEP Group")
beneficially owned, in the aggregate, 1,542,809 shares and options to
purchase 1,614,836 shares of Common Stock, or 10.7% of 29,633,378 (the
number of shares outstanding on that date plus the number of shares that
would have been outstanding if all options held by the members of the MEP
Group which were exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003 were
exercised). Of that total, 705,410 shares and options to purchase 391,656
shares of Common Stock were purchased under the Management Equity
Provisions ("MEP") of the Company's 1993 Incentive Plan and are subject to
the terms of an Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, dated February 28,
1997, as amended (the "Voting Agreement") pursuant to which MEP shares are
voted in accordance with the will of the holders of a majority of the
shares governed by the Voting Agreement. The balance of 837,399 shares and
options to purchase 1,223,180 shares of Common Stock were purchased or held
outside the MEP. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"
below. The MEP Group's address is c/o Concord Camera Corp., 4000 Hollywood
Boulevard, Presidential Circle - 6th Floor, North Tower, Hollywood, Florida
33021.
(4) Represents: (i) 954,972 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock
options exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003; (ii) 698,732 shares
owned, as to all of which Mr. Lampert has sole dispositive power; (iii)
331,011 shares, the receipt of which was deferred by Mr. Lampert until July
1, 2005 under the Company's Deferred Delivery Plan, but which could be
acquired by him within 60 days of August 1, 2003 under certain limited
circumstances described in that plan; and (iv) 25,000 shares held by a
ss 501(c)(3) charitable trust of which Mr. Lampert is a trustee with voting
and dispositive power. Since Mr. Lampert is part of the MEP Group, the
shares beneficially owned by him are included in footnote (3) above; the
MEP Group is deemed to have acquired the shares beneficially owned by any
member of the MEP Group described in footnote (3) above. In addition, since
Mr. Lampert currently owns a majority of the shares governed by the Voting
Agreement, he has the right to vote an additional 273,066 MEP shares
(705,410 MEP shares, less the 432,344 MEP shares owned directly by Mr.
Lampert) which are not included in the amount shown as beneficially owned
by Mr. Lampert.
(5) Includes 63,500 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003.
(6) Represents 67,500 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003, and 15,000 shares held by
the Notra Trading Inc. Profit Sharing Plan & Trust, a retirement plan of
which Mr. Gindi is a co-trustee and participant.
(7) Represents: (i) 67,500 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock
options exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003; and (ii) 84,500
shares held by the Hakman Family Trust, of which Mr. Hakman is a trustee
and beneficiary, 30,000 shares held by the Hakman Capital Corporation
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, and 240,000 shares held by a corporation
controlled by Mr. Hakman.
(8) Represents shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003.
(9) Represents 322,260 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003 and 191,666 shares owned, as
to all of which Mr. King has sole dispositive power. Since Mr. King is
part of the MEP Group, the shares beneficially owned by him are included
in footnote (3) above; the MEP Group is deemed to have acquired the shares
beneficially owned by any member of the MEP Group described in footnote
(3) above.
(10) Represents 216,356 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003 and 210,000 shares owned, as
to all of which Keith Lampert has sole dispositive power. Since Mr. Lampert
is part of the MEP Group, the shares beneficially owned by him are included
in footnote (3) above; the MEP Group is deemed to have acquired the shares
beneficially owned by any member of the MEP Group described in footnote (3)
above.
(11) Includes 78,665 shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003.
(12) Represents shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options
exercisable within 60 days of August 1, 2003.
-43-
Fiscal Year-End Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth aggregated information concerning our equity
compensation plans outstanding at June 28, 2003.
No. of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
No. of Securities to be Weighted-Average under Equity
Issued upon Exercise of Exercise Price of Compensation Plans
Options, Warrants and Options, Warrants and (excluding shares
Rights Outstanding Rights Outstanding reflected in
Plan Category at FY End (#) at FY End ($) the 1st column)
------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- -------------------
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by Shareholders 3,149,376 $3.59 118,208
Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by
Shareholders 1,067,250 $4.20 849,000
--------- ----- -------
Total 4,216,626 $3.75 967,208
========= ===== =======
At June 28, 2003, we had a total of thirty-two (32) compensation plans under
which Common Stock was authorized for issuance that were adopted without
shareholder approval: (i) the 2002 Incentive Plan for Non-Officer Employees, New
Recruits and Consultants (the "First 2002 Incentive Plan") and the 2002
Incentive Plan for New Recruits (the "Second 2002 Incentive Plan", collectively
with the First 2002 Incentive Plan, the "2002 Plans"); and (ii) thirty (30)
individual stock option plans that were issued to employees (four of whom are
executive officers) as an inducement to their employment with the Company and
one that was issued to a consultant as a retention inducement. None of the
options issued under any of these plans qualifies as an incentive stock option
for federal tax purposes.
At June 28, 2003, 500,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance
pursuant to outstanding options granted under and options available for grant
under each of the 2002 Plans. New recruits (including officers), non-officer
employees and consultants in our service are eligible to participate in the
First 2002 Incentive Plan. Only new recruits (including officers) are eligible
to participate in the Second 2002 Incentive Plan. The 2002 Plans generally
provide for the granting of stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted shares or any combination of the foregoing to eligible participants.
Shares subject to any outstanding options under each of these plans which expire
or otherwise terminate prior to exercise will be available for subsequent
issuance under the plan. Except as otherwise required by law or the plan, the
Compensation and Stock Option Committee or our Board of Directors determine
which eligible individuals are to receive option grants, the number of shares
subject to each such grant, the vesting schedule for the option grant, the
maximum term for which any granted option is to remain outstanding, and the
exercise price. The exercise price may not be less than the fair market value of
the option shares on the grant date.
At June 28, 2003, 916,250 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate were reserved
for issuance under individual stock option plans that were issued to employees
(four of whom are executive officers) as an inducement to their becoming
employed by the Company, and to a consultant as an inducement for his continued
services, or were subsequently received by the employee or consultant, in
exchange for their inducement option, in connection with a stock option
repricing program. These plans were adopted for retention of new employees and
consultants and have substantially the same terms and conditions as options
issued under the 2002 Plans. These stock options generally vest in three annual
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the employee's start date or
the grant date, have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Common
Stock on the date of grant, and expire ten years after the grant date. For those
stock options that were received in exchange for the person's inducement option,
the vesting schedule and expiration date of the inducement option were carried
forward into the person's repriced stock option. The individual stock option
plan issued to our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Ira B.
Lampert, had substantially the same terms and conditions as the other individual
plans, however, it provided that the option would remain exercisable until its
stated expiration date in the event of Mr. Lampert's termination without cause,
the non-renewal of his employment contract, his death or disability, or a change
of control. On July 14, 2003, Mr. Lampert exercised the outstanding balance
under his individual stock option plan in full before it expired on July 15,
2003.
-44-
The consultant's stock option began vesting on the date of grant, continues
vesting in annual installments and will become vested in full on April 24, 2004,
provided he continues to make his services available to the Company. The
consultant is required to pay liquidated damages to the Company if the stock
option stops vesting because he stopped making his services available to the
Company (other than by reason of his death or disability). In the event of the
death or disability of the consultant, or a change of control, while the
consultant is still making his services available to the Company, the option
will become exercisable in full and remain exercisable until the stated
expiration date.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Consulting Arrangements with Directors
A corporation controlled by J. David Hakman provided consulting services to us
from 1997 to July 2002 pursuant to an engagement agreement entered into on
September 25, 1997, as later amended and supplemented (the "Hakman Agreement").
Pursuant to the Hakman Agreement, the Company granted a warrant to purchase up
to 260,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.25 per share to a
corporation controlled by Mr. Hakman. In October 2000, the corporation exercised
the warrant as to all 113,000 shares that had vested up until that time. On
September 25, 2002, the corporation exercised the warrant as to another 77,000
shares that were vested and exercisable at that time. The warrant never vested
as to the remaining 70,000 shares and expired on September 25, 2002.
From May 1, 2002 through June 15, 2003, William J. Lloyd, who was a member of
our Board at the time, provided us with consulting services related to the
technological aspects of cameras and other products. As compensation for these
consulting services, the Company paid a corporation controlled by Mr. Lloyd a
retainer of $5,000 per month. The Company accepted Mr. Lloyd's resignation from
our Board effective as of July 31, 2003, and the consulting relationship was
terminated as of June 15, 2003, in order to avoid any conflicts of interest that
could result from a new executive position that had been accepted by Mr. Lloyd
with another company.
Transactions under the Management Equity Provisions of the 1993 Incentive Plan
On August 23, 1995, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved stock
purchase awards under the Management Equity Provisions ("MEP") of the Company's
1993 Incentive Plan pursuant to which 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock were made
available for purchase by senior management of the Company at a price per share
equal to $2.6875 per share (the closing price of the Common Stock on August 23,
1995, adjusted for the two-for-one stock split effective on April 14, 2000)
pursuant to binding commitments to be made by such persons by August 31, 1995.
The Company received commitments for the purchase of 888,000 shares (the
"Purchased Shares"). Each purchaser was also granted the right to receive a
contingent restricted stock award covering a number of shares equal to the
number of shares he had purchased based upon attainment of increases in
shareholder value in accordance with the plan. If issued, such contingent
restricted shares were to vest over a three-year period and were subject to
forfeiture prior to vesting under certain conditions.
In November 1995, members of the Company's senior management entered into
purchase agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") for the Purchased Shares.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreements, each purchaser executed a full recourse
note for the purchase price of such shares (each a "Note"; collectively, the
"Notes") and pledged the Purchased Shares as security for the payment of the
Note. The Notes bore interest at an annual rate of 6%. Concurrently with the
execution of their respective Purchase Agreements and Notes, each purchaser
entered into a Voting Agreement pursuant to which each purchaser agreed to vote
all of his Purchased Shares and contingent restricted stock in accordance with
the determination of the holders of a majority of all of the Purchased Shares
and contingent restricted stock held by the purchasers. To effect the foregoing,
each of the purchasers delivered an irrevocable proxy to Ira B. Lampert.
-45-
Pursuant to Amendments to each of the Purchase Agreements dated February 28,
1997 (the "Amendments"), the Company was relieved of its obligation to issue any
contingent restricted stock. Instead, each participating member of the Company's
senior management received, as of December 22, 1996, options to purchase that
number of shares of Common Stock (the "Option Shares") equal to the number of
Purchased Shares purchased by such person, at an exercise price of $0.9063 per
share. The options vested as to 20% of the Option Shares covered thereby as of
December 22, 1996, and the balance of the shares covered thereby began vesting
December 31, 1996 in equal monthly installments over a four-year period during
the term of employment or consultancy. The unvested portion became vested on
August 19, 1998 when the average closing price of the Common Stock was at least
$2.50 (after adjustment for the stock split effective on April 14, 2000) for 90
consecutive trading days. Concurrently with the Amendments, the Voting Agreement
and the irrevocable proxies were amended and restated to include the Option
Shares and delete any mention of the contingent restricted stock.
In April 1999, the Board approved a conditional release program whereby the
Company agreed to forgive a portion of the indebtedness represented by each Note
and concurrently release a proportionate number of Purchased Shares held by the
Company as security for payment of the Notes. The debt forgiveness and share
release program (the "Release Program") began on May 1, 1999 and continued on
January 1 each year through January 1, 2003. The total principal sum subject to
forgiveness under the Release Program was $2,386,500, together with interest
owed under the Notes. The debt forgiveness was conditioned upon the person's
continued employment with the Company. If a person ceased to be an employee or
consultant of the Company prior to full forgiveness of the debt, the principal
balance of the Note would have become immediately due and payable, including any
amounts scheduled to be forgiven at a future date.
As contemplated by the MEP, subsequent to 1995 certain Purchased Shares and the
related options were transferred to other eligible members of the Company's
senior management upon their execution of the required agreements and Notes.
Notes previously delivered to secure payment for such shares were canceled upon
delivery of new Notes by current members. The Purchased Shares and options
awarded pursuant to the MEP are presently held by Ira B. Lampert, Brian F. King,
Keith L. Lampert, Harlan I. Press and Arthur Zawodny.
In January 2000, the Board further provided that a participant in the MEP would
have the right to prepay all or any portion of the indebtedness represented by a
Note issued in connection with the purchase of shares, and that the amount so
prepaid would be repaid to the participant as deferred compensation at such time
as the amount would otherwise have been forgiven in accordance with the Release
Program.
The following were the scheduled release dates, and the total amounts that were
forgiven* on such dates, under the Release Program.
-46-
Total Principal Total Purchased
Releasee Release Dates Indebtedness Forgiven Shares Released
-------- -------------------------------- ------------------------ ----------------------
Brian F. King May 1, 1999, and January 1st $ 430,000* 160,000
of 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
Ira B. Lampert May 1, 1999, and January 1st $ 1,612,500* 600,000
of 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
Keith L. Lampert May 1, 1999, and January 1st $ 295,625* 110,000
of 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
Harlan I. Press January 6, 2000, and January $ 10,750 4,000
1st of 2001, 2002 and 2003
Arthur Zawodny May 1, 1999, and January 1st $ 37,625* 14,000
of 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
-----------
* After the January 1, 2000 release date, the balance of these amounts were
repaid in full. Ira B. Lampert, Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert and Arthur
Zawodny have each prepaid in full the balance of the debts represented by
their Notes and, as a result of their continued employment with the Company,
received deferred compensation in lieu of the amounts scheduled to be
forgiven under the Release Program.
Employment of Christopher Lampert
Another son of Ira B. Lampert, Christopher Lampert, works for the Company in
Hong Kong and the PRC as a project analyst and product operations manager. In
Fiscal 2003, we paid a total of $62,988 for his salary and his housing in Hong
Kong. Housing is customarily provided to our employees stationed by the Company
in Hong Kong and/or the PRC on foreign assignment.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) (1) and (2) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes
thereto, the related reports thereon of the certified public accountants and
financial statement schedule are filed under Item 8 of this report:
(a)(1) Financial Statements Page
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants................F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002....F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001..................F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years
ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001............F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended June 28, 2003, June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001............F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................F-6
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves.....F-36
All other financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the
instructions to Item 8 or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
-47-
(a)(3) Exhibits
No. Description Method of Filing
--- ----------- ----------------
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended Incorporated by reference to the Company's
through May 9, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
July 1, 2000.
3.2 Restated By-Laws, as amended through Incorporated by reference to the Company's
December 4, 2002 quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 28, 2002.
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate Incorporated by reference to the Company's
registration statement on Form 8-A filed
September 20, 2000.
4.2 Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 1998, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
between Dreyfus High Yield Strategies Fund annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
and the Company June 30, 1998.
4.3 Indenture, dated July 30, 1998, between Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Bankers Trust Company and the Company annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 1998.
4.4 Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 3, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
1998, between Dreyfus High Yield Strategies annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Fund and the Company June 30, 1998.
9.1* Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, dated Incorporated by reference to the Company's
February 28, 1997, among the parties annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
signatory thereto, including among others, July 1, 2000.
Ira B. Lampert, Brian King and Arthur
Zawodny, as amended on various dates in 1998
to add certain additional shares of the
Company's Common Stock owned by Ira B.
Lampert, Brian King and Keith Lampert and as
further amended on January 6, 2000 to add
certain shares owned by Harlan Press
10.1 Settlement Agreement between the Company and Filed herewith.
the Commission effective September 1, 1994
10.2 Second renewal agreement of Master Processing Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Contract No. (86)507, dated March 15, 1996, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
and approval notice issued by the Longgang ended September 30, 2000.
Economic Development Bureau (English
translations)
10.3 Contract for Grant of State-Owned Land Use Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Right, dated November 8, 1994, with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
Shenzhen Land Bureau (English translation) ended September 30, 2000.
-48-
10.4 Hong Kong Credit Facility and Factoring Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Agreement, dated September 8, 1999, between quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation ended January 1, 2000.
Limited ("HSBC") and Concord HK
10.5 Letter agreements between HSBC and Concord HK Incorporated by reference to the Company's
dated June 1, 2002 and June 4, 2002, relating annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
to and amending the Hong Kong Credit Facility June 29, 2002.
and Factoring Agreement
10.6 Renewal of Business License of Concord Camera Filed herewith.
(Shenzhen) Company Limited, issued by the
Shenzhen Municipal Administration for
Industry and Commerce on June 4, 2003
(English translation)
10.7* Incentive Plan (1993), as amended through Incorporated by reference to the Company's
April 24, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
July 1, 2000.
10.8* Amendments to the Incentive Plan (1993)dated Incorporated by reference to the Company's
as of April 19, 2001 and August 2, 2001 Schedule TO/A-1 filed August 28, 2001
10.9* Amendment to Incentive Plan (1993)dated as Incorporated by reference to the Company's
of January 20, 2003 quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 29, 2003.
10.10* Amendments to Incentive Plan (1993) dated as Filed herewith.
of February 10, 2003 and June 2, 2003
10.11* 2002 Incentive Plan for Non-Officer Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Employees, New Recruits and Consultants, and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Amendment No. 1 to same dated September 4, June 29, 2002.
2002
10.12* Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 2,2003 to Filed herewith.
2002 Incentive Plan for Non-Officer
Employees, New Recruits and Consultants
10.13* 2002 Incentive Plan for New Recruits, and Filed herewith.
Amendment No.1 to same dated as of June 2,
2003
10.14* Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated as Incorporated by reference to the Company's
of May 15, 1998, between Urs W. Stampfli and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
the Company June 29, 2002.
-49-
10.15* Amendment, effective as of February 11, 2003, Filed herewith.
to Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated
as of May 15, 1998, between Urs W. Stampfli
and the Company
10.16* Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated as Incorporated by reference to the Company's
of December 22, 1996, between Brian F. King annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
and the Company June 29, 2002.
10.17* Amendment, effective as of February 11, 2003, Filed herewith.
to Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated
as of December 22, 1996, between Brian F.
King and the Company
10.18* Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated as Incorporated by reference to the Company's
of December 22, 1996, between Ira B. Lampert annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
and the Company June 29, 2002.
10.19* Amendment, effective as of February 11, 2003, Filed herewith.
to Stock Option (Plan and) Agreement, dated
as of December 22, 1996, between Ira B.
Lampert and the Company
10.20* Deferred Delivery Plan, effective as of Filed herewith.
February 10, 2003
10.21* Amended and Restated 1995 Annual Incentive Filed herewith.
Compensation Plan, as amended through June
11, 2003
10.22* Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Cash Filed herewith.
Incentive Plan, as amended through June 11,
2003, and amendment to same dated July 31, 2003
10.23* 2002-2003 Performance Criteria under 2002 Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Long Term Cash Incentive Plan annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 29, 2002.
10.24* Restated Flexible Perquisite Spending Account Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Program for Key Executives quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 28, 2002.
10.25* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
dated as of May 1,1997, between the Company annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
and Ira B. Lampert June 30, 1997.
-50-
10.26* Amendment No.1 dated as of August 25, 1998, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Amendment No.3 dated as of April 19, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
and Amendment No. 4 dated as of January 1, June 30, 2001.
2001, to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1997, between
Ira B. Lampert and the Company
10.27* Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 1999, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
dated as of May 1, 1997, between Ira B. ended January 2, 1999.
Lampert and the Company
10.28* Amendment No. 5, dated as of December 2, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
2002, to Amended and Restated Employment quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1997, between ended December 28, 2002.
Ira B. Lampert and the Company
10.29* Amendment No. 6, dated February 10, 2003, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
dated as of May 1, 1997, between Ira B. ended March 29, 2003.
Lampert and the Company
10.30* Amended and Restated Deferral Agreement, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
dated as of January 1, 2002, between Concord annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Camera Corp. and Ira B. Lampert June 29, 2002.
10.31* Deferral Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2000, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
between Concord Camera Corp. and Keith L. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Lampert, and amendment to same dated as of June 29, 2002.
June 1, 2002
10.32* Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Retirement Plan and Agreement dated as of annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
April 19, 2000, between Ira B. Lampert and June 30, 2001.
the Company, and Amendment No. 1 to same
dated as of January 1, 2001
10.33* Amendment No. 2, dated as of January 1, 2002, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
to Amended and Restated Supplemental annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Executive Retirement Plan and Agreement dated June 29, 2002.
as of April 19, 2000, between Ira B. Lampert
and the Company
10.34* Terms of Employment between Brian F. King and Incorporated by reference to the Company's
the Company, effective as of January 1, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2001.
-51-
10.35* Amendment, dated as of November 20, 2002, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Terms of Employment dated as of January 1, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
2000, between Brian F. King and the Company ended December 28, 2002.
10.36* Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 26, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
2003, and Amendment No.3 dated as of March quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
30, 2003, to Terms of Employment dated as of ended March 29, 2003.
January 1, 2000, between Brian F. King and
the Company
10.37* Terms of Employment between Urs W. Stampfli Incorporated by reference to the Company's
and the Company, effective as of January 1, annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
2000 June 30, 2001.
10.38* Amendment, dated as of November 20, 2002, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Terms of Employment dated as of January 1, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
2000, between Urs W. Stampfli and the Company ended December 28, 2002.
10.39* Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 26, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
2003, and Amendment No. 3 dated as of March quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
30, 2003, to Terms of Employment dated as of ended March 29, 2003.
January 1, 2000, between Urs W. Stampfli and
the Company
10.40* Terms of Employment between Keith L. Lampert Incorporated by reference to the Company's
and the Company, effective as of November 11, quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
2002 ended December 28, 2002.
10.41* Terms of Employment between Richard Filed herewith.
Finkbeiner and the Company, effective as of
July 22, 2002, and Amendment No. 1 to same
dated as of January 1, 2003
10.42* Form of Supplemental Executive Retirement Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Plan and Agreement, dated as of April 19, annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
2000, between the Company and each of certain July 1, 2000.
executive officers
10.43* Form of Amendment to the Supplemental Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Executive Retirement Plan and Agreement, annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
dated as of April 19, 2000, between the June 30, 2001.
Company and each of certain executive officers
10.44* Form of Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 1, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
2002, to the Supplemental Executive annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Retirement Plan and Agreement between the June 29, 2002.
Company and each of Brian King, Keith
Lampert, Urs Stampfli and Harlan Press
-52-
10.45* Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Filed herewith.
Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2002, between
the Company and Richard M. Finkbeiner
10.46* Concord Camera Corp. Executive Management Tax Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Equalization Policy annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 29, 2002.
10.47 Lease Agreement, undated between Prologis Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Trust, a Maryland real estate investment quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
trust, and the Company ended January 2, 1999.
10.48 Lease Agreement, dated as of August 12,1998, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
between CarrAmerica Realty Corp. and the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
Company ended January 2, 1999.
10.49 First Amendment, dated October 12, 1999, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Lease dated as of August 12, 1998, between quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
CarrAmerica Realty Corp. and the Company ended October 2, 1999.
10.50 Second Amendment, dated January 3, 2000, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Lease dated as of August 12, 1998, between annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
CarrAmerica Realty Corp. and the Company July 1, 2000.
10.51 Third Amendment, dated January 6, 2003, to Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Lease dated as of August 12, 1998, between quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
CRD Presidential, LLC and the Company ended December 28, 2002.
10.52 Tenancy Agreement, dated September 18, 2002, Incorporated by reference to the Company's
between Southnice Investments Limited and quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
Concord Camera HK Limited ended December 28, 2002.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company Incorporated by reference to the Company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 29, 2002.
23 Consent of Independent Certified Public Filed herewith.
Accountants
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Filed herewith.
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Filed herewith.
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Filed herewith.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Filed herewith.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350
--------------
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
The Financial Statement Schedules required to be filed pursuant to this Item
15(d) are listed above.
-53-
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
On May 9, 2003, in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8216, the Company reported
under Item 9 - Regulation FD Disclosure (in lieu of Item 12 - Disclosure of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition) on Form 8-K information regarding
a press release announcing the Company's financial results for the quarter and
nine months ended March 29, 2003, and furnished a copy of the press release
dated May 9, 2003 as an exhibit to the foregoing report.
-54-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CONCORD CAMERA CORP.
Date: September 25, 2003 By: /s/ Ira B. Lampert
-----------------------------------
Ira B. Lampert, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name Capacity Date
---- -------- ----
/s/ Ira B. Lampert Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive September 25, 2003
------------------------------ Officer and President (Principal
Ira B. Lampert Executive Officer)
/s/ Richard M. Finkbeiner Senior Vice President and September 25, 2003
------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer
Richard M. Finkbeiner (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Harlan I. Press Vice President and Treasurer September 25, 2003
------------------------------ (Principal Accounting Officer)
Harlan I. Press
/s/ Ronald S. Cooper Director September 25, 2003
------------------------------
Ronald S. Cooper
/s/ Morris H. Gindi Director September 25, 2003
------------------------------
Morris H. Gindi
/s/ J. David Hakman Director September 25, 2003
------------------------------
J. David Hakman
/s/ William J. O'Neill, Jr. Director September 25, 2003
------------------------------
William J. O'Neill, Jr.
-55-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Concord Camera Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Concord Camera
Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended June 28, 2003. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a).
These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Concord
Camera Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, and the
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended June 28, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the related
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
July 31, 2003, except as to the last paragraph of Note 15 for which the date is
August 6, 2003
F-1
Concord Camera Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
------------ -----------
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 38,221 $ 103,868
Short-term investments 50,035 -
Accounts receivable, net 32,494 22,984
Inventories 32,317 22,485
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 5,122 4,194
---------- ---------
Total current assets 158,189 153,531
Property, plant and equipment, net 21,328 20,985
Goodwill, net 3,721 3,721
Other assets 22,576 19,839
---------- ---------
Total assets $ 205,814 $ 198,076
========== =========
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 22,105 $ 12,502
Accrued expenses 13,023 12,013
Other current liabilities 1,984 634
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities 37,112 25,149
Senior notes - 14,934
Other liabilities 11,874 8,837
---------- ----------
Total liabilities 48,986 48,920
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Blank check preferred stock, no par value
1,000 shares authorized, none issued - -
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 29,464 and 29,029 shares issued
as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively 141,109 140,547
Paid-in capital 5,407 4,412
Deferred stock-based compensation (190) (332)
Notes receivable arising from common stock purchase agreements - (1)
Retained earnings 15,070 8,667
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (431) -
---------- ---------
160,965 153,293
Less: treasury stock, at cost, 1,543 shares (4,137) (4,137)
---------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity 156,828 149,156
---------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 205,814 $ 198,076
========== =========
See accompanying notes.
F-2
Concord Camera Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended
-----------------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
------------ ------------ ----------
Net sales $ 189,783 $ 129,317 $ 180,061
Cost of products sold 153,532 110,345 152,598
----------- ----------- ----------
Gross profit 36,251 18,972 27,463
Selling expenses 8,905 6,343 8,149
General and administrative expenses 20,616 20,968 33,313
(Recovery) of operating expenses, net - (1,150) -
Variable stock-based compensation expense 900 - -
Terminated acquisition costs - - 800
Interest expense 1,230 2,522 2,794
Other (income), net (2,372) (3,060) (4,892)
----------- ----------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes 6,972 (6,651) (12,701)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 569 (1,403) (931)
----------- ----------- ----------
Net income (loss) $ 6,403 $ (5,248) $ (11,770)
=========== =========== ==========
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.23 $ (0.19) $ (0.45)
=========== =========== ==========
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.22 $ (0.19) $ (0.45)
=========== =========== ==========
Weighted average
common shares outstanding - basic 27,874 27,438 25,992
Dilutive effect of common stock options 1,571 - -
----------- ----------- ----------
Weighted average
common shares outstanding - diluted 29,445 27,438 25,992
=========== =========== ==========
See accompanying notes.
F-3
Concord Camera Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands)
Notes
Receivable
arising
Common Stock from Common Accumulated
------------ Deferred Stock Treasury Stock Other
Issued Stated Paid-in Stock-Based Retained Purchase -------------- Comprehensive
Shares Value Capital Compensation Earnings Agreements Shares Cost Loss Total
------ ----- ------- ------------ ------------------- ------ ---- ---- -----
Balance as of July 1, 2000 23,826 $42,145 $2,626 $ - $25,685 $ (29) 1,543 $(4,137) $ - $66,290
Issuance of common stock,
net 4,485 96,881 - - - - - - - 96,881
Exercise of stock options
and warrants 601 1,228 - - - - - - - 1,228
Income tax benefit from
stock options exercised - - 1,696 - - - - - - 1,696
Interest on notes
receivable arising from
common stock purchase
agreements - - - - - (2) - - - (2)
Officers' notes forgiven on
stock purchases - - - - - 14 - - - 14
Net loss - - - - (11,770) - - - - (11,770)
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- ------ ------ -------
Balance as of June 30, 2001 28,912 140,254 4,322 - 13,915 (17) 1,543 (4,137) - 154,337
Exercise of stock options 117 293 - - - - - - - 293
Deferred stock-based
compensation - - - (332) - - - - - (332)
Interest on notes
receivable arising from
common stock purchase
agreements - - - - - (1) - - - (1)
Officers' notes forgiven on
stock purchases - - - - - 8 - - - 8
Officers' notes paid on
stock purchase - - - - - 9 - - - 9
Stock-based compensation - - 90 - - - - - - 90
Net loss - - - - (5,248) - - - - (5,248)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ --------
Balance as of June 29, 2002 29,029 140,547 4,412 (332) 8,667 (1) 1,543 (4,137) - 149,156
Exercise of stock options
and warrants 435 562 - 562
Deferred stock-based
compensation - - - 142 - - - - - 142
Officers' notes forgiven on
stock purchases - - - - - 1 - - - 1
Stock-based compensation - - 995 - - - - - - 995
Net income - - - - 6,403 - - - - 6,403
Unrealized loss on
securities - - - - - - - - (431) (431)
--------
Comprehensive income 5,972
------- -------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Balance as of June 28, 2003 29,464 $141,109 $5,407 $ (190) $15,070 $ - 1,543 $(4,137) $(431) $156,828
======= ======== ======= ======== ======= ======= ======= ======== ======= ========
See accompanying notes.
F-4
Concord Camera Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Year Ended
---------------------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
------------- -------------- ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 6,403 $ (5,248) $ (11,770)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 6,068 6,260 5,737
Write-off of deferred finance costs 303 - -
Deferred income taxes and stock option exercise
tax benefit 339 (1,403) 174
Non-cash compensation expense 900 - 401
Settlement of net accrued product costs (2,234) - -
Provision for specific doubtful accounts 519 2,282 15,800
Provision for specific inventory obsolescence 22 3,261 4,714
Restructuring (reversal) reserve - (448) 1,400
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (10,029) (14) (7,484)
Inventories (9,854) 5,020 (3,877)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 73 163 3,246
Other assets (2,763) (1,651) (2,555)
Accounts payable 9,603 (5,489) (7,519)
Accrued expenses 3,249 (2,872) (766)
Other current liabilities 351 (1,914) (361)
Other liabilities 2,036 919 (580)
-------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 4,986 (1,134) (3,440)
-------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (5,795) (2,141) (7,488)
Purchase of available-for-sale investments (50,466) - -
Proceeds from maturities (purchases) of
held-to-maturity investments - 49,870 (49,870)
-------- ---------- ----------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (56,261) 47,729 (57,358)
-------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net repayments under short-term debt agreements - - (2,190)
Repayments of Senior Notes (14,934) - -
Net principal repayments under capital
lease obligations - (504) (2,037)
Proceeds from notes receivable arising from
common stock purchase agreements - 9 -
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 562 293 98,110
-------- ---------- ----------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (14,372) (202) 93,883
-------- ---------- ----------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (65,647) 46,393 33,085
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 103,868 57,475 24,390
-------- ---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year $ 38,221 $ 103,868 $ 57,475
======== ========== ==========
See Note 2, "Supplemental Cash Flow Information," and accompanying notes.
F-5
CONCORD CAMERA CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Description of Business
Concord Camera Corp., a New Jersey corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the "Company") designs, develops,
manufactures and sells high quality, popularly priced, easy-to-use image capture
products on a worldwide basis. The Company manufacturers and assembles its
products in its manufacturing facilities in the People's Republic of China
("PRC"). In addition, the Company purchases some products from third parties.
The Company's products include digital image capture devices, 35mm and APS
traditional and single use cameras, and instant cameras. The Company also serves
as a contract manufacturer of developed and co-developed products for its Design
and Manufacturing Services ("DMS") customers, and also sells its own branded and
private label versions of many of those products, incorporating certain of the
co-developed technology, to its Retail Sales and Distribution ("RSD") customers.
During the fiscal years ended June 28, 2003 ("Fiscal 2003"), June 29, 2002
("Fiscal 2002"), and June 30, 2001 ("Fiscal 2001"), net sales and percentages of
total net sales of the Company's three largest customers collectively amounted
to $98.7 million (52.0%), $61.9 million (47.9%), and $74.7 million (41.5%),
respectively. See Note 22, "Geographic Area Information," for further
information about significant customers.
Beginning in the fiscal year ended July 3, 1999 (Fiscal 1999), the Company
changed its fiscal year to end on the Saturday closest to June 30. Prior to
Fiscal 1999, the Company's fiscal year was the twelve-month period ending June
30.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Transactions
The Company operates on a worldwide basis and its results may be adversely or
positively affected by fluctuations of various foreign currencies against the
U.S. Dollar, specifically, the Canadian Dollar, European Euro, British Pound
Sterling, PRC Renminbi, Hong Kong Dollar and the Japanese Yen. Each of the
Company's foreign subsidiaries purchases its finished goods inventories in U.S.
Dollars. Accordingly, the U.S. Dollar is the functional currency. Certain net
sales to customers and purchases of certain components and services are
transacted in local currency, including Japanese Yen, thereby creating an
exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The translation
from the applicable currencies to U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet
accounts using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and
for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate during
the period. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions and
remeasurement are included in "Other (income), net" in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. For Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002, and Fiscal
2001 included in "Other (income), net" in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations are approximately $(1.4) million, $(0.2) million, and
$(0.3) million, respectively, of net foreign currency (gains).
F-6
Hedging Activities
During Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001 the Company had no forward
exchange contracts outstanding and did not participate in any other type of
hedging activities.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company sells a significant percentage of its products to a relatively small
number of customers. These customers operate in markets located principally in
the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada, Latin America,
PRC and Hong Kong. Receivables arising from these sales are generally not
collateralized. The Company's credit terms extended to customers are generally
sixty days or less. The Company does not charge interest on amounts
outstanding. The Company monitors the credit-worthiness of its customers and
reviews outstanding receivable balances for collectibility on a regular basis
and records provisions for doubtful accounts as necessary. Customers that
individually account for greater than 10% of the Company's total net sales
create a concentration of credit risk. During Fiscal 2003, there were three such
customers. See Note 22, "Geographic Area Information," for further discussion of
significant customers.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
accounts receivable, net, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate
fair value because of their short duration to maturity. The fair value of debt
is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same issues or on current
rates offered to the Company for debt with the same remaining maturities.
Because judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of
fair value, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that
could be realized or would be paid in a current market exchange. The effect of
using different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may be material
to the estimated fair value amounts. The carrying amount of the Company's Senior
Notes approximated fair value at June 29, 2002. See Note 9, "Senior Notes."
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three
months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investments
At June 28, 2003, the Company's "Short-term investments", as classified in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet, consisted of fixed income funds that
invest in debt securities and are considered available-for-sale securities.
Investments in marketable securities not classified as held-to-maturity or
trading are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are
carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax,
reported as a component of comprehensive income (loss) unless the loss is other
than temporary, and then it would be included in earnings. Realized gains and
losses, interest and dividends are classified as investment income in "Other
(income), net" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of
June 28, 2003, the gross cost, unrealized holding loss, and fair value of the
short-term investments were $50.4 million, $0.4 million, and $50.0 million,
respectively. Dividend income of $0.6 million related to the short-term
investments was included in "Other (income), net" for Fiscal 2003.
Investments held in deferred compensation trusts directed by participants are
classified as trading with changes in fair value recorded in earnings.
Inventories
Inventories, the majority of which are raw materials, components and
work-in-progress, are stated at the lower of cost or market value and are
determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Work-in-progress and component
inventory costs include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. The
Company records lower of cost or market value adjustments for excess, obsolete
or slow-moving inventory based on changes in customer demand, technological
developments or other economic factors.
F-7
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Property, plant and equipment, net are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed by use of the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.
Small tools and accessories used in production in the PRC are charged to
operations when purchased. Leasehold costs and improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease or their estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter. Depreciation expense for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and
Fiscal 2001 was approximately $5.4 million, $5.4 million and $4.6 million,
respectively.
Useful Lives
Asset Class (in years)
----------- --------
Buildings 30-50
Equipment 3-10
Office furniture and equipment 3-7
Automobiles 5-7
Leasehold improvements 3-11
Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net
assets acquired and, for the one-year period ended June 30, 2001, goodwill was
amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from fifteen to twenty
years. Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
("SFAS No. 142") and ceased amortizing its remaining goodwill balances. Under
SFAS No. 142, the Company's goodwill is subject to an impairment test, at least
annually. Identifiable intangible assets that have finite useful lives will
continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company's amortizable
intangible assets include patents, trademarks and licenses and their respective
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
See Note 6, "Goodwill, Net," and Note 7, "Other Assets," for a discussion of the
effect of adopting SFAS No. 142.
Impairment of Long-lived and Other Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long Lived Assets, the Company records impairment losses when indications of
impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amounts. No impairment
indicators were identified for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 or Fiscal 2001.
For royalty related assets, the Company will record an impairment loss if the
total expected royalty payments to be made over the life of an agreement,
excluding any minimum required payments, are less than the royalty related
assets' carrying value. The total expected royalty payments to be made over the
life of an agreement are dependent on management's estimates about future sales
volumes. Because judgment is required to estimate future sales volumes, the
estimates are not necessarily indicative of the sales volumes that will be
actually realized in the future.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when title and risk of loss are transferred to the
customer, which is generally when the product is shipped. Net sales includes a
provision for returns based on historical trends in product returns. If future
returns are higher than estimated based on historical data, net sales could be
adversely affected. Net sales includes reimbursements of $1.7 million, $1.3
million and $0 for certain development costs incurred in connection with joint
production agreements with third parties during Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and
Fiscal 2001, respectively. Revenue is recognized on these arrangements as
contractual milestones are achieved.
F-8
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company incurred shipping and handling costs of approximately $2.1 million,
$1.3 million and $1.8 million during Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001,
respectively, that are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations under the caption "Selling expenses". Costs incurred by the Company
related to shipping and handling that ready products for sale (i.e., freight
charges incurred to transport products to the Company's manufacturing facilities
and warehouses) are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations under the caption "Cost of products sold."
Product Design and Development Costs
Product design and development costs, which include costs in connection with new
product development, product design, fundamental and exploratory research,
process improvement, product use technology, and product quality assurance, are
part of the production process and are expensed when products are sold. The
Company's products are developed, designed and engineered principally by its own
engineers in the Company's three product development and design centers located
in the U.S., Hong Kong and the PRC. The Company incurred $8.5 million, $7.6
million and $6.4 million during Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001,
respectively, for product design and development. These costs are included in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations under the caption, "Cost
of products sold."
Advertising and Promotional Allowances
Advertising and promotional costs, which include advertising allowances and
other discounts, have been expensed as incurred and have historically been
included in selling expenses. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
("EITF") Issue No. 00-25, Vendor Income Statement Characterization of
Consideration from a Vendor to a Retailer, which addresses the operating
statement classification of consideration between a vendor and a retailer, the
Company has recorded certain variable selling expenses including advertising
allowances, other discounts, and other allowances as a reduction of net sales.
Stock-Based Compensation
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, ("SFAS
No. 123") as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
and Disclosure, ("SFAS No. 148") the Company has elected to follow Accounting
Principles Board Opinion ("APB Opinion") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, ("APB No. 25") intrinsic value method and related interpretations in
accounting for its employee stock-based transactions and has complied with the
disclosure requirement of SFAS No. 148. See Note 11, "Stockholders' Equity" and
Note 12, "Stock Option Plans". Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is
calculated at the time of option grant, based upon the difference between the
exercise price of the option and the fair market value of the Company's no par
value common stock ("Common Stock"). Compensation expense is recognized over the
option's vesting period. In the Fall of 2001, the Company consummated an
exchange offer for certain outstanding stock options and, as a result, is
required to apply variable stock-based compensation accounting for the new
options issued in the exchange until they are exercised, cancelled or expired.
For Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded $0.9 million of variable stock-based
compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations because its
Common Stock price on June 28, 2003 was higher than the new repriced stock
options' exercise price of $5.97. For Fiscal 2002, the Company did not record
any variable stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated statement of
operations because its Common Stock price on June 29, 2002 was below the new
repriced stock options' exercise price of $5.97. Because the determination of
variable stock-based compensation expense associated with the repriced stock
options is significantly dependent upon the Company's closing Common Stock price
at the end of each prospective reporting period, it is not possible to determine
its future impact, either favorable or unfavorable, on the consolidated
financial statements.
F-9
The Company accounts for its stock option plans using the intrinsic value method
prescribed by APB No. 25, and related Interpretations, under which no
compensation cost for stock options is recognized for stock option awards
granted at or above fair market value. Effective July 19, 2001, the Company
amended the outstanding fully vested options held by certain former directors to
permit such options to be exercised until their stated expiration dates.
Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share
is required by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, has been determined as
if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value
method of that Statement. The effects of applying SFAS No. 148 for either
recognizing compensation expense or providing pro forma disclosures are not
likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income for future
years. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using
a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions for the three years ended June 28, 2003:
Fiscal 2003 Fiscal 2002 Fiscal 2001
--------------- --------------- --------------
Risk-Free Interest Rate 2.5% 3.3% 3.5%
Expected Option Lives 3-5 years 3-5 years 3-5 years
Expected Volatilities 0.849 0.883 0.871
Expected Dividend Yields 0% 0% 0%
Weighted Average Fair Value
of Options Granted $3.39 $1.85 $6.51
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of the Company's employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No.
148, the estimated fair value of the equity awards is amortized to expense over
the options' vesting period. The following table illustrates the effect on net
income (loss) and earning (loss) per share if the fair value based method had
been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
Fiscal Year
---------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income (loss), as reported $ 6,403 $ (5,248) $(11,770)
Add: variable stock-based compensation expenses, net of
related tax effects, included in the determination of net
income (loss) as reported 743 - -
Deduct: total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects (1,712) (3,711) (5,035)
--------- ---------- --------
Pro forma net income (loss) $ 5,434 $ (8,959) $(16,805)
========= ========== ========
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic - as reported $ 0.23 $ (0.19) $ (0.45)
========== ========== ========
Basic - pro forma $ 0.19 $ (0.33) $ (0.65)
========== ========== ========
Diluted - as reported $ 0.22 $ (0.19) $ (0.45)
========== ========== ========
Diluted - pro forma $ 0.19 $ (0.33) $ (0.65)
========== ========== ========
F-10
Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is based on the consolidated United
States entities' and individual foreign companies' estimated tax rates for the
applicable year. Deferred taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability
method based on the difference between financial reporting and tax basis of
assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred
income tax provisions and benefits are based on the changes in the net deferred
tax asset or liability from period to period. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, ("SFAS No. 130"), includes net earnings adjusted for certain revenues,
expenses, gains and losses that are excluded from net earnings under generally
accepted accounting principles. Unrealized gains and losses related to the
Company's available-for-sale investments are included as a component of
"Accumulated other comprehensive loss" reported in the accompanying balance
sheet as of June 28, 2003. Such gains and losses are excluded from net income
(loss). As of June 28, 2003, an amount classified within "Accumulated other
comprehensive loss" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet consisted
solely of gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities of $(0.4)
million. See "Short-term Investments" above for a further discussion of
available-for-sale securities.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are calculated in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, ("SFAS No. 128"). All applicable earnings
(loss) per share amounts have been presented in conformity with SFAS No. 128
requirements. In Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, potentially dilutive securities
comprised of options to purchase 1,705,270 and 2,439,440 shares of Common Stock,
respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share
because their impact was antidilutive.
F-11
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both
Liabilities and Equity, ("SFAS No. 150"). The statement established standards
for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer
classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an
asset in some circumstances). The statement is effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is
effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15,
2003. Because the Company does not have any financial instruments falling within
the scope of this statement, no additional disclosures are required and SFAS No.
150 will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities. FASB Interpretation No. 46 requires consolidation of
a variable interest entity if a company's variable interest absorbs a majority
of the entity's losses or receives a majority of the entity's expected residual
returns, or both. The Company does not believe it has any variable interest
entities. However, the Company continues to evaluate the effect of adopting FASB
Interpretation No. 46 on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, which amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide for alternative methods of transition
for an entity that changes to the fair value method of accounting for employee
stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require expanded disclosure of the effects of an
entity's accounting policy with respect to employee stock-based compensation.
SFAS No. 148, which became effective in the third quarter Fiscal 2003, did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, as the Company
has not adopted the fair value method for employee stock-based compensation. See
Note 12, "Stock Option Plans."
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others, which requires guarantors to make significant new
disclosures and requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value. FASB
Interpretation No. 45 disclosure requirements are effective for periods ending
after December 15, 2002 and for guarantees issued or modified after December 31,
2002. Because the Company has no material guarantees, no additional disclosures
are required and FASB Interpretation No. 45 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No.
4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Correction,
("SFAS No. 145"). SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses
from Extinguishment of Debt, and other existing authoritative pronouncements to
make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their
applicability under changed conditions. According to SFAS No.145, a gain or loss
from the extinguishment of debt should not be classified as extraordinary if it
does not meet the criteria for classification as an extraordinary item under APB
Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of
Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently
Occurring Events and Transaction. SFAS No. 145 is effective for financial
statements issued after May 15, 2002. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a
loss of $0.3 million associated with the write-off of deferred finance costs on
the repurchase of its Senior Notes under the caption "Interest expense" in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for Fiscal 2003. See Note 9,
"Senior Notes."
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation.
F-12
NOTE 2 - SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
(in thousands)
Fiscal Year
--------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
---------- ---------- ---------
Cash paid for interest $ 212 $ 1,841 $ 2,217
========== ========== =========
Cash paid for income taxes $ - $ 494 $ 1,523
========== ========== =========
NOTE 3 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET:
(in thousands)
Accounts receivable, net consist of the following:
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
------------ -----------
Trade accounts receivable $ 35,605 $ 25,576
Less: provisions for doubtful accounts, discounts,
returns and allowances (3,111) (2,592)
---------- ---------
Total accounts receivable, net $ 32,494 $ 22,984
========== =========
NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES:
(in thousands)
Inventories consist of the following:
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
---------- ----------
Raw material, components and work in progress $ 19,345 $ 16,197
Finished goods 12,972 6,288
---------- ----------
Total inventories $ 32,317 $ 22,485
========== ==========
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET:
(in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
---------- ----------
Buildings $ 7,385 $ 7,385
Equipment 32,951 30,499
Office furniture and equipment 11,245 9,975
Automobiles 599 478
Leasehold improvements 5,116 4,836
---------- ---------
57,296 53,173
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (35,968) (32,188)
---------- ---------
Total property, plant and equipment, net $ 21,328 $ 20,985
========== =========
F-13
NOTE 6 - GOODWILL, NET
(in thousands)
Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142,
which eliminates the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets, and initiates an annual review of these assets for impairment.
Identifiable intangible assets with determinable useful lives will continue to
be amortized. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company ceased amortization
of its goodwill balances. The Company currently does not have any
indefinite-lived intangible assets. Intangible assets that have finite useful
lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, the Company performed an impairment test of its existing goodwill
and it is management's assessment that goodwill impairment does not exist. The
accounting standard requires the presentation of a reconciliation of previously
reported net income and earnings per share to the amounts adjusted for the
exclusion of the goodwill amortization net of related tax effect.
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
---------- ----------
Goodwill $ 6,401 $ 6,401
Less: accumulated amortization (2,680) (2,680)
---------- ---------
Goodwill, net $ 3,721 $ 3,721
========== =========
F-14
Net (loss) and (loss) per share for Fiscal 2001, as adjusted for the exclusion
of amortization expense, was as follows:
Fiscal 2001 Impact of
-------------------------- Exclusion of
As As Goodwill
Reported Adjusted Amort. Expense
----------- ------------ ---------------
(Loss) before income
taxes (as originally reported) $ (12,701) $ (12,701) $ -
Adjustment for the exclusion
of goodwill amortization - 291 291
---------- ---------- ----------
(Loss) income before income taxes (12,701) (12,410) 291
(Benefit) provision for income taxes (931) (843) 88
----------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) income $ (11,770) $ (11,567) $ 203
=========== ========== ==========
Basic and diluted (loss) per share $ (0.45) $ (0.45) $ -
=========== ========== ==========
NOTE 7 - OTHER ASSETS:
(in thousands)
Other assets consist of:
Useful Lives June 28, June 29,
(in Years) 2003 2002
-------------- ---------- ---------
Patents, trademarks and licenses, net 5 - 20 $ 4,643 $ 5,242
Deferred compensation 8,349 6,971
Deferred tax asset, net 5,837 6,893
Prepaid royalties 3,412 -
Other 335 733
--------- ---------
$ 22,576 $ 19,839
========= =========
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
--------- ---------
Patents, trademarks and licenses $ 8,932 $ 8,932
Less: accumulated amortization (4,289) (3,690)
--------- ---------
Patents, trademarks and licenses, net $ 4,643 $ 5,242
========= =========
F-15
Estimated Aggregate
Fiscal Year Amortization Expense
----------- ----------------------
2004 $330
2005 $324
2006 $324
2007 $291
2008 $263
As of June 28, 2003, the aggregate weighted average amortization period for
patents, trademarks, and licenses was approximately eighteen years. For Fiscal
2003 and Fiscal 2002, intangible asset amortization expense was $0.6 million and
$0.7 million, respectively.
See Note 10, "Other Liabilities," for a description of deferred compensation,
Note 14, "Income Taxes," for a description of deferred tax assets, and Note 15,
"Commitments and Contingencies," for a description of license and royalty
agreements.
NOTE 8 - SHORT-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING FACILITIES:
The Company had no short-term debt outstanding as of June 28, 2003 or June 29,
2002.
Hong Kong Financing Facilities
A Hong Kong subsidiary of the Company has various revolving credit facilities in
place providing an aggregate of approximately $23.5 million in borrowing
capacity. Certain of the revolving credit facilities are denominated in Hong
Kong Dollars. Since 1983 the Hong Kong Dollar has been pegged to the United
States Dollar. The revolving credit facilities are comprised of 1) an
approximately $11.0 million Import Facility, 2) an approximately $2.6 million
Packing Credit and Export Facility, 3) an approximately $1.9 million Foreign
Exchange Facility and 4) an $8.0 million Accounts Receivable Factoring Facility
(collectively, the "Hong Kong Financing Facilities"). The $8.0 million Accounts
Receivable Factoring Facility is secured by certain accounts receivables of the
Hong Kong subsidiary and guaranteed by the Company. The Company also guarantees
the remaining amount of approximately $15.5 million under the Hong Kong
Financing Facilities. Availability under the Accounts Receivable Factoring
Facility is subject to advance formulas based on Eligible Accounts Receivable
and all of the Hong Kong Financing Facilities are subject to certain financial
ratios and covenants. The Hong Kong Financing Facilities bear interest at
variable rates. At June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, there were no amounts
outstanding under the Hong Kong Financing Facilities.
United Kingdom Credit Facility
A United Kingdom ("UK") subsidiary of the Company had a revolving credit
facility (the "UK Facility") in place that provided approximately $1.2 million
of borrowing capacity. The facility was secured by substantially all of the
assets of the subsidiary, and was principally utilized for working capital needs
and bore interest at 1.5% above the UK prime lending rate. At June 28, 2003 and
June 29, 2002, no amounts were outstanding under this facility. The UK Facility
expired in August 2003.
NOTE 9 - SENIOR NOTES:
On July 30, 1998, the Company consummated a private placement of $15.0 million
of unsecured senior notes ("Senior Notes"). The notes bore interest at 11%,
payable quarterly, and the maturity date was July 15, 2005. The amortization of
the deferred costs associated with the Senior Notes was included in interest
expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
F-16
On August 15, 2002, the Company repurchased the Senior Notes. The Company paid
slightly below par to repurchase and cancel the Senior Notes. At the time of
repurchase, the Company incurred $0.3 million of expenses associated with the
write-off of deferred finance costs related to the Senior Notes, which was
included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations for Fiscal 2003.
As of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, the outstanding balances of the Senior
Notes were $0 and $14.9 million, respectively.
NOTE 10 - OTHER LIABILITIES:
(in thousands)
Other liabilities consist of the following:
June 28, June 29,
2003 2002
------------ -----------
Deferred compensation obligations $ 8,285 $ 5,961
Licensing and royalty related obligations 3,425 2,660
Other 164 216
----------- --------
Total other liabilities $ 11,874 $ 8,837
=========== =========
Deferred compensation obligations represents the total vested account balances
for all participants included in the Company's SERPs and for those participants
who have individual deferred compensation agreements. An asset associated with
such deferred compensation arrangements was also recorded in "Other assets" in
the accompanying balance sheets as of June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002,
respectively. These assets are funded by the Company in separate trusts in the
name of each participant in the SERPs. The trust makes payments directly to all
participants. The underlying assets are recorded at fair value and primarily
represent marketable equity securities invested at the participants' direction.
Changes in the vested account balances of the deferred compensation obligations
as well as changes in the fair value of the underlying assets are recorded in
earnings. Licensing and royalty related obligations represent the total of
future minimum royalty payment amounts and an amount equal to the present value
of future payments related to various licensing agreements. See Note 15,
"Commitments and Contingencies."
NOTE 11 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
On September 26, 2000, the Company sold, pursuant to an underwritten public
offering, 3.9 million shares of its Common Stock at a price of $23.00 per share.
Pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters, the Company
sold an additional 585,000 shares of Common Stock on October 3, 2000 at a price
of $23.00 per share. The net proceeds of the offering to the Company were $96.9
million, after deducting offering costs and underwriting fees of $6.3 million
from gross proceeds of $103.2 million. The use of the offering proceeds was
intended to repay outstanding indebtedness including capital leases, for capital
expenditures and for general corporate and strategic purposes, including working
capital and investments in new technologies, product lines and complementary
businesses.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2000, the shareholders authorized the Company to
issue up to 1.0 million shares of blank check preferred stock, with such rights
and preferences as may be determined by the Board from time to time. None of
this preferred stock has been issued to date.
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends for any of the fiscal
years presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
F-17
On August 23, 1995, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved stock
purchase awards under the Management Equity Provisions ("MEP") of the Company's
1993 Incentive Plan ("Incentive Plan") pursuant to which 1.0 million shares of
Common Stock were made available for purchase by senior management of the
Company at a price per share equal to $2.6875 per share (the closing price of
the Common Stock on August 23, 1995, as adjusted for the two-for-one stock split
effective on April 14, 2000) pursuant to binding commitments to be made by such
persons by August 31, 1995. The Company received commitments for the purchase of
888,000 shares (the "Purchased Shares"). Each purchaser was also granted the
right to receive a contingent restricted stock award covering a number of shares
equal to the number of shares he had purchased based upon attainment of
increases in shareholder value in accordance with the Incentive Plan. If issued,
such contingent restricted shares were to vest over a three-year period and were
subject to forfeiture prior to vesting under certain conditions.
In November 1995, members of the Company's senior management entered into
purchase agreements (the "Purchase Agreements") for the Purchased Shares.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreements, each purchaser executed a full recourse
note for the purchase price of such shares (each a "Note"; collectively, the
"Notes") and pledged the Purchased Shares as security for the payment of the
Note. The Notes bore interest at an annual rate of 6%. Concurrently with the
execution of their respective Purchase Agreements and Notes, each purchaser
entered into a Voting Agreement pursuant to which each purchaser agreed to vote
all of his Purchased Shares and contingent restricted stock in accordance with
the determination of the holders of a majority of all of the Purchased Shares
and contingent restricted stock held by the purchasers. To effect the foregoing,
each of the purchasers delivered an irrevocable proxy to Ira B. Lampert.
Pursuant to Amendments to each of the Purchase Agreements dated February 28,
1997 (the "Amendments"), the Company was relieved of its obligation to issue any
contingent restricted stock. Instead, each participating member of the Company's
senior management received, as of December 22, 1996, options to purchase that
number of shares of Common Stock (the "Option Shares") equal to the number of
Purchased Shares purchased by such person, at an exercise price of $0.9063 per
share. The options vested as to 20% of the Option Shares covered thereby as of
December 22, 1996, and the balance of the shares covered thereby began vesting
December 31, 1996 in equal monthly installments over a four-year period during
the term of employment or consultancy. The unvested portion became vested on
August 19, 1998 when the average closing price of the Common Stock was at least
$2.50 (after adjustment for the two-for-one stock split effective on April 14,
2000) for 90 consecutive trading days. Concurrently with the Amendments, the
Voting Agreement and the irrevocable proxies were amended and restated to
include the Option Shares and delete any mention of the contingent restricted
stock.
In April 1999, the Board approved a conditional release program whereby the
Company agreed to forgive a portion of the indebtedness represented by each Note
and concurrently release a proportionate number of Purchased Shares held by the
Company as security for payment of the Notes. The debt forgiveness and share
release program (the "Release Program") began on May 1, 1999 and continued on
January 1 each year through January 1, 2003. The total principal sum subject to
forgiveness under the Release Program was approximately $2.4 million, together
with interest owed under the Notes. The debt forgiveness was conditioned upon
the person's continued employment with the Company. If a person ceased to be an
employee or consultant of the Company prior to full forgiveness of the debt, the
principal balance of the Note would have become immediately due and payable,
including any amounts scheduled to be forgiven at a future date.
As contemplated by the MEP, subsequent to 1995 certain Purchased Shares and the
related options were transferred to other eligible members of the Company's
senior management upon their execution of the required agreements and Notes.
Notes previously delivered to secure payment for such shares were canceled upon
delivery of new Notes by current members. The Purchased Shares and options
awarded pursuant to the MEP are presently held by Ira B. Lampert, Brian F. King,
Keith L. Lampert, Harlan I. Press and Arthur Zawodny.
F-18
In January 2000, the Board further provided that a participant in the MEP would
have the right to prepay all or any portion of the indebtedness represented by a
Note issued in connection with the purchase of shares, and that the amount so
prepaid would be repaid to the participant as deferred compensation at such time
as the amount would otherwise have been forgiven in accordance with the Release
Program.
The following were the release dates, and the total amounts that were forgiven*
on such dates, under the Release Program:
Total Principal Total Purchased
Releasee Release Dates Indebtedness Forgiven Shares Released
-------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------
May 1, 1999, and January 1st of
Brian F. King................... 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 $ 430,000* 160,000
May 1, 1999, and January 1st of
Ira B. Lampert.................. 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 $ 1,612,500* 600,000
May 1, 1999, and January 1st of
Keith L. Lampert................ 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 $ 295,625* 110,000
January 6, 2000, and January 1st of
Harlan I. Press................. 2001, 2002 and 2003 $ 10,750 4,000
May 1, 1999, and January 1st of
Arthur Zawodny.................. 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 $ 37,625* 14,000
-----------
* After the January 1, 2000 release date, the balance of these amounts were
repaid in full. Ira B. Lampert, Brian F. King, Keith L. Lampert and Arthur
Zawodny have each prepaid in full the balance of the debts represented by their
Notes and, as a result of their continued employment with the Company, were
entitled to receive deferred compensation in lieu of the amounts scheduled to be
forgiven under the Release Program.
NOTE 12 - STOCK OPTION PLANS:
On September 4, 2002, the Company adopted a non-qualified stock option plan that
provides for a maximum number of 500,000 shares of Common Stock for awards
issuable to new employees ("SEP 2002 Plan"). The SEP 2002 Plan permits the
Company's Compensation Committee or Board to grant, in their discretion, a
variety of Common Stock awards on a stand-alone, combination, or tandem basis.
The SEP 2002 Plan expires in September 2012.
On April 26, 2002, the Company adopted a non-qualified stock option plan that
provides for a maximum number of 500,000 shares of Common Stock for awards
issuable to non-officer employees, new employees, and consultants ("APR 2002
Plan"). The APR 2002 Plan permits the Company's Compensation Committee or Board
to grant, in their discretion, a variety of Common Stock awards on a
stand-alone, combination, or tandem basis. The APR 2002 Plan expires in April
2013.
On August 28, 2001, the Company launched an offer to exchange outstanding stock
options with an exercise price of more than $7.00 per share for new options to
purchase 75% of the shares subject to the outstanding options at an exercise
price of $5.97 per share (the closing price of the Common Stock as reported on
the Nasdaq National Market on the date the Board of Directors approved the
exchange offer). The exchange offer expired on October 16, 2001. The Company
accepted for exchange and cancelled options to purchase a total of 1,375,876
shares of Common Stock and issued new options to purchase a total of 1,031,908
shares of Common Stock in exchange for the cancelled options. As a result of the
exchange offer, the Company is required to apply variable accounting for these
new stock options until the options are exercised, cancelled or expired. For
Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded $0.9 million in variable stock-based
compensation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
because the Company's Common Stock price on June 28, 2003 was greater than the
new repriced stock options' exercise price of $5.97. For Fiscal 2002, the
Company did not record any variable stock-based compensation expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations because the Company's Common
Stock price on June 29, 2002 was below the new repriced stock options' exercise
price of $5.97.
F-19
The Company's 1993 Incentive Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the
Company's Board to grant a variety of Common Stock awards. As amended, a maximum
number of 3,400,584 shares of Common Stock are subject to the 1993 Incentive
Plan. The 1993 Incentive Plan expires on December 1, 2003.
In addition, the Company, from time to time, has granted stock options to
certain individuals as part of an "individual employee stock option plan" as an
inducement to employment.
Stock option activity was as follows:
1993 Plan APR 2002 Plan
----------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Number of Average Number of Average
Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
------------- -------------- ------------ --------------
Outstanding at July 1, 2000 3,499,048 $8.31 - -
Canceled (200,000) $22.19 - -
Granted 269,500 $8.63 - -
Exercised (325,000) $1.56 - -
------------- -------------- ------------ --------------
Outstanding at June 30, 2001 3,243,548 $7.55 - -
Canceled (1,090,965) $20.82 - -
Granted 1,101,884 $6.06 6,000 $5.35
Exercised (43,125) $1.66 - -
------------- -------------- ------------ --------------
Outstanding at June 29, 2002 3,211,342 $3.18 6,000 $5.35
Canceled (23,300) $3.63 (40,000) $4.65
Granted 309,999 $5.30 143,000 $4.45
Exercised (348,665) $0.99 - -
------------- -------------- ------------ --------------
Outstanding at June 28, 2003 3,149,376 $3.59 109,000 $4.43
============= ============== ============ ==============
Exercisable at June 28, 2003 2,780,927 $3.33 1,000 $5.35
============= ============== ============ ==============
Exercisable at June 29, 2002 2,707,810 $2.72 - -
============= ============== ============ ==============
Exercisable at June 30, 2001 2,602,041 $6.37 - -
============= ============== ============ ==============
F-20
SEP 2002 Plan Individual Plans
--------------------------- -----------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Number of Average Number of Average
Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
----------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Outstanding at July 1, 2000 - - 1,272,432 $3.17
Canceled - - (60,834) $14.06
Granted - - 317,500 $17.90
Exercised - - (267,600) $2.65
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------
Outstanding at June 30, 2001 - - 1,261,498 $7.07
Canceled - - (403,832) $17.13
Granted - - 367,000 $6.11
Exercised - - (74,500) $2.97
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------
Outstanding at June 29, 2002 - - 1,150,166 $3.44
Canceled - - (147,916) $2.46
Granted 42,000 $5.24 - -
Exercised - - (86,000) $1.52
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------
Outstanding at June 28, 2003 42,000 $5.24 916,250 $4.13
=========== ============== ============== =============
Exercisable at June 28, 2003 - - 790,314 $3.77
=========== ============== ============== =============
Exercisable at June 29, 2002 - - 733,698 $2.55
=========== ============== ============== =============
Exercisable at June 30, 2001 - - 705,664 $4.17
=========== ============== ============== =============
1993 Plan Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
--------- -------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Weighted
Average
Number Remaining Weighted Number Weighted
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Average Outstanding Average
At Least Less Than June 28, 2003 Life Exercise Price June 28, 2003 Exercise Price
-------- --------- -------------- -------------- ----------------- -------------- --------------
$0.50 $1.00 753,516 2.8 $0.94 753,516 $0.94
$1.00 $2.00 732,850 2.3 $1.47 732,850 $1.47
$2.00 $4.00 137,000 5.3 $2.84 137,000 $2.84
$4.00 $6.00 1,206,510 5.4 $5.74 906,729 $5.89
$6.00 $8.00 274,500 6.1 $6.73 209,832 $6.75
$8.00 $9.00 45,000 4.5 $8.23 41,000 $8.22
--------------- -------------- ------------------ -------------- --------------
$0.50 $9.00 3,149,376 4.1 $3.59 2,780,927 $3.33
=============== ============== ================== ============== ==============
F-21
APR 2002 Plan Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Weighted
Average
Number Remaining Weighted Number Weighted
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Average Outstanding Average
At Least Less Than June 28, 2003 Life Exercise Price June 28, 2003 Exercise Price
-------- --------- -------------- ------------- ------------------ --------------- ----------------
$2.00 $4.00 75,000 9.1 $4.00 - -
$4.00 $6.00 34,000 9.3 $5.39 1,000 $5.35
-------------- ------------- ------------------ --------------- ----------------
$2.00 $6.00 109,000 9.1 $4.43 1,000 $5.35
============== ============= ================== =============== ================
SEP 2002 Plan Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Weighted
Average
Number Remaining Weighted Number Weighted
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Average Outstanding Average
At Least Less Than June 28, 2003 Life Exercise Price June 28, 2003 Exercise Price
-------- --------- ------------- --------------- ---------------- ------------ --------------
$4.00 $6.00 42,000 9.6 $5.24 - -
-------------- --------------- ---------------- ------------ --------------
$4.00 $6.00 42,000 9.6 $5.24 - -
============== =============== ================ ============ ==============
Individual Plans Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
---------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Weighted
Average
Number Remaining Weighted Number Weighted
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding Contractual Average Outstanding Average
At Least Less Than June 28, 2003 Life Exercise Price June 28, 2003 Exercise Price
-------- --------- -------------- --------------- ---------------- -------------- ----------------
$1.00 $2.00 185,000 0.9 $1.83 185,000 $1.83
$2.00 $4.00 315,000 1.0 $2.75 315,000 $2.75
$4.00 $6.00 264,250 7.0 $5.71 209,649 $5.81
$6.00 $8.00 140,000 7.6 $6.93 76,666 $6.86
$8.00 $9.00 12,000 8.8 $8.31 3,999 $8.31
-------------- --------------- ---------------- -------------- ----------------
$1.00 $9.00 916,250 3.8 $4.13 790,134 $3.77
============== =============== ================ ============== ================
1993 APR 2002 SEP 2002 Individual
At June 28, 2003: Plan Plan Plan Plans Total
----------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Shares of Common Stock
available for future grants 118,208 391,000 458,000 - 967,208
Shares of Common Stock
reserved for future issuances 3,149,376 109,000 42,000 916,250 4,216,626
NOTE 13 - DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN:
The Company maintains a defined contribution plan ("401(k)") that covers
substantially all employees meeting certain service requirements. The Company,
in its sole discretion, makes matching cash contributions up to specified
percentages of employees' contributions and makes additional discretionary
contributions if the Company achieves certain profitability requirements.
F-22
For Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002, and Fiscal 2001, the Company's expenses related to
the 401(k) were $268,000, $235,000, and $224,000, respectively.
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES:
(in thousands)
Income (loss) before income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations consists of the following:
Year Ended
--------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
----------- ----------- ----------
United States $ (241) $ (3,105) $ (126)
Foreign 7,213 (3,546) (12,575)
----------- ---------- ----------
$ 6,972 $ (6,651) $ (12,701)
=========== ========== ==========
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following:
Year Ended
--------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
----------- ------------ ----------
Current:
United States $ 61 $ - $ 591
Foreign 168 - -
Deferred
United States (149) (1,121) (525)
Foreign 489 (282) (997)
---------- ----------- ---------
$ 569 $ (1,403) $ (931)
========== =========== =========
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of (a)
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and
(b) operating loss carryforwards. The tax effects of significant items
comprising the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 28, 2003
are as follows:
F-23
United States Foreign
------------- -------
Federal State Hong Kong Europe Total
------- ----- --------- ------ -----
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
-------------------------
Difference between book and tax
basis of property $ - $ - $ (852) $ - $ (852)
Other deferred liabilities (65) - - - (65)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total deferred liabilities $ (65) $ - $ (852) $ - $ (917)
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
Deferred Tax Assets:
--------------------
Operating loss carryforwards $ 941 $ - $ 804 $ 235 $ 1,980
Reserves not currently deductible 495 45 - - 540
Unrealized loss on investment 151 11 - - 162
Depreciation 207 14 - - 221
Compensation accruals 3,638 284 - - 3,922
Difference between book and tax
basis of property 347 26 - - 373
Tax credits 211 - - - 211
Amortization 777 32 - - 809
Contributions carryover 294 22 - - 316
Other deferred tax assets 35 6 - 129 170
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Total deferred tax assets $ 7,096 $ 440 $ 804 $ 364 $ 8,704
------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ -----------
Less: valuation allowance (151) (11) - (364) (526)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Net deferred tax asset $ 6,880 $ 429 $ (48) $ - $ 7,261
============ =========== ============ ============ ===========
The net deferred tax assets included in "Prepaid expenses and other current
assets" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 28, 2003 was $1.5
million and the net deferred tax assets included in "Other assets" in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 28, 2003 was $5.8 million.
F-24
The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company's deferred tax
assets and liabilities as of June 29, 2002 are as follows:
United States Foreign
------------- -------
Federal State Kong Hong Europe Total
------- ----- --------- ------ -----
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
-------------------------
Difference between book and tax
basis of property $ - $ - $ (866) $ - $ (866)
Other deferred liabilities (116) - (15) - (131)
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Total deferred liabilities $ (116) $ - $ (881) $ - $ (997)
=========== ============ =========== =========== ==========
Deferred Tax Assets:
--------------------
Operating loss carryforwards $ 2,708 $ 169 $ 1,322 $ 1,088 $ 5,287
Reserves not currently deductible 257 12 - - 269
Depreciation 157 10 - - 167
Compensation accruals 2,562 172 - - 2,734
Difference between book and tax
basis of property 129 8 - - 137
Tax credits 129 - - - 129
Amortization 604 19 - - 623
Contributions carryover 308 26 - - 334
Other deferred tax assets 2 4 - 66 72
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Total deferred tax assets $ 6,856 $ 420 $ 1,322 $ 1,154 $ 9,752
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Less: valuation allowance - - - (1,154) (1,154)
------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
Net deferred tax asset $ 6,740 $ 420 $ 441 $ - $ 7,601
============ ============ =========== =========== ==========
The net deferred tax assets included in "Prepaid expenses and other current
assets" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 29, 2002 was $0.7
million and the net deferred tax assets included in "Other assets" in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at June 29, 2002 was $6.9 million.
The Company currently does not pay income or turnover taxes in the PRC on its
processing activities, but there can be no assurance that the Company will not
be required to pay such taxes in the future. Income derived from Hong Kong
business activities is taxed separately from the PRC. The Company's Hong Kong
subsidiary's annual tax rate increased from 8.0% to 8.75% effective for Fiscal
2003.
The Company has never paid any income or turnover tax to the PRC related to its
processing activities in the PRC. Existing PRC statutes can be construed as
providing for a minimum of 10% to 15% income tax and a 3% turnover tax on the
Company's business activities; however, the PRC has never attempted to enforce
those statutes. The Company has been advised that the PRC's State Tax Bureau is
reviewing the applicability of those statutes to processing activities of the
type engaged in by the Company, but it has not yet announced any final decisions
as to the taxability of those activities. After consultation with its tax
advisors, the Company does not believe that any tax exposure it may have on
account of its operations in the PRC will be material to its financial
statements.
F-25
The Company does not provide for U.S. federal income taxes on undistributed
earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as it intends to permanently reinvest such
earnings. Undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries approximated $49.0
million as of June 28, 2003. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax
that might be payable if such earnings were ever remitted. However, no
withholding taxes would be payable under current law. As of June 28, 2003,
Concord had net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. tax purposes of
approximately $7.8 million, of which approximately $4.3 million as of June 28,
2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively, were attributable to deductions associated
with stock option exercises. The net operating loss carryforwards expire as
follows: $2.8 million in 2010 and the balance thereafter. Additionally, the
Company has approximately $10.6 million, of which $8.2 million relates to Hong
Kong, of net operating loss carryforwards related to its foreign operations
which have no expiration dates.
As of June 28, 2003, management evaluated the Company's deferred tax asset. As
part of assessing the realizability of its deferred tax assets, management
evaluated whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of its
deferred tax assets, will be realized. The realization of its U.S. and Hong Kong
deferred tax assets relates directly to the Company's tax planning initiatives
and strategies for U.S. federal and state tax purposes and Hong Kong purposes.
As of June 28, 2003, based on all the available evidence, management determined
that it is more likely than not that its U.S. and Hong Kong deferred tax assets
will be fully realized. Accordingly, there was no valuation allowance recorded
against its U.S. deferred tax asset at June 28, 2003 except for $0.2 million
related solely to the utilization of a potential capital loss associated with
the Company's short-term investments. The Company's management also evaluated
its European deferred tax assets and determined that a full valuation allowance
of $0.4 million and $1.2 million at June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002,
respectively, was appropriate. During Fiscal 2003, the European valuation was
reduced by $0.3 million as a result of utilizing $0.9 million of net operating
loss carryforwards. For Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002, and Fiscal 2001, the Company's
effective tax rate was 8.2%, (21.1%), and (7.3%), respectively. The Company's
future effective tax rate will depend on the apportionment between foreign and
domestic taxable income and losses, and the statutory rates of the related tax
jurisdictions.
A reconciliation of income tax expense computed at the statutory U.S. federal
rate to the actual provision (benefit) for income taxes is as follows:
Year Ended
-----------------------------------------------
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
----------- ----------- -----------
Computed tax (benefit) at statutory U.S. federal
tax rates $ 2,440 $ (2,328) $ (4,446)
Earnings (loss) of foreign subsidiaries subject
to a different tax rate (1,752) 2,057 3,462
U.S. permanent differences 100 44
Utilization of European valuation allowance (283) (1,123) -
State income tax, net of federal benefit 40 (78) 76
Other 24 25 (23)
---------- --------- ----------
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 569 $ (1,403) $ (931)
========== ========= ==========
NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Offices and Warehouses
United States
The Company's principal offices, including its U.S. design center, occupy
approximately 20,000 square feet at 4000 Hollywood Boulevard, Hollywood,
Florida. The Company's domestic warehouse is approximately 13,700 square feet,
about 825 square feet of which is office space, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The
Company's leases for these facilities provide for rent of approximately $25,800
and $7,700 per month, respectively, with annual increases ranging from 2-3% and
3%, respectively, and expire on January 31, 2014, and January 31, 2009,
respectively.
F-26
Hong Kong
The Company leases a total of approximately 33,000 square feet of office,
business and warehouse space comprised of one floor under a lease expiring in
2047, and four floors under a lease, that has an option to extend to July 31,
2006, expiring in July 2004, at Concord Technology Centre, Texaco Road, Tsuen
Wan, New Territories, Hong Kong at a cost of approximately $16,200 per month
including rent and maintenance.
PRC Operations
The Company manufactures its products at its manufacturing facilities located in
the Longgang District of Shenzhen, PRC (the "Company Facility"). The Company
leases three employee dormitories and a canteen (the "Dormitories") at a cost of
approximately $46,000 per month. The aggregate square footage of the Company
Facility and the Dormitories is in excess of 600,000 square feet.
In Fiscal 2000, the Company completed an expansion to increase the aggregate
size of the Company Facility. The Company also opened a new production facility
dedicated to digital image capture device manufacturing. In connection with
these construction activities, the Company incurred costs of approximately
$4,000,000. Such costs are being amortized over the expected useful life of the
expanded facilities. The current processing agreement with the PRC expires in
October 2006. The Company fully expects to renew its agreement and intends to
continue to expand its operations in the PRC, but there can be no assurance that
the processing agreement will be extended or renewed and the Company will be
able to continue to operate in the PRC. Pursuant to a land use agreement, the
Company has the title and right to use the land upon which the Company Facility
sits through the year 2038. At the end of the term, title and ownership to the
land and Company Facility transfer to a PRC governmental agency. At that time,
the Company expects to be able to lease the PRC land and improvements thereon at
then prevailing rates.
Other Jurisdictions
The Company owns an 11,000 square foot building on a one-half acre parcel in the
UK that is used in connection with its operations in the UK. The Company also
leases warehouse and/or office space in France, Canada, and Germany in
connection with the activities of its subsidiaries in those jurisdictions.
Leases
During Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, the Company made principal payments under
capital lease obligations related to various fixed assets that were classified
as capital leases. The initial terms of such capital leases ranged from three to
five years and expired at various times through June 29, 2002. Monthly payments
on those leases ranged from approximately $300 to $45,000. During Fiscal 2002,
the Company paid off the remaining balance of its capital lease obligations.
F-27
Future minimum rental payments for operating leases are as follows:
(in thousands)
Fiscal Year
-----------
2004 $ 1,066
2005 715
2006 509
2007 498
2008 495
Thereafter 1,891
-----------
Total minimum payments $ 5,174
===========
Rental expense for operating leases of approximately $1.6 million, $1.6 million,
and $1.9 million was incurred for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001,
respectively.
Employment Agreements and Executive SERPS
The employment agreement for Ira B. Lampert (the "Lampert Agreement") has a
four-year term that automatically extends each day, by one day, until one party
notifies the other that the term should not be further extended. The Lampert
Agreement provides that if his employment with the Company is terminated by
reason of death or disability, Mr. Lampert or his legal representative would be
entitled to receive, in addition to accrued compensation (including, without
limitation, any earned but unpaid bonus or long-term incentive awards, any
amount of base salary accrued or earned but unpaid, any deferred compensation
earned but unpaid, any accrued but unused vacation pay and unreimbursed business
expenses (the "Accrued Amounts")), his base salary for the scheduled balance of
the term (payable in the case of death in a lump sum), a prorated bonus for the
year in which the death or disability occurred, and any other or additional
benefits owed to the executive under the then applicable employee benefit plans
or policies of the Company, subject in the case of disability to offset against
the base salary payment by the amount of any disability benefits provided to him
by the Company or under any disability insurance provided by or paid for by the
Company.
The Lampert Agreement entitles Ira B. Lampert to participate generally in all
pension, retirement, insurance, savings, welfare and other employee benefit
plans and arrangements and fringe benefits and perquisites maintained by the
Company from time to time for senior executives of a comparable level. In
addition to any life insurance provided pursuant to one of the Company's plans,
Mr. Lampert is also provided with term life insurance, for such beneficiaries as
are designated by Mr. Lampert, of $5 million face value, and long-term
disability coverage with an annual benefit of $352,000 and a lump sum benefit of
$1 million payable in the event that Mr. Lampert's employment with the Company
is terminated due to his disability (the "Additional Life and Disability
Insurance"). In addition, the Company may purchase key man life insurance on the
life of Mr. Lampert, which may be used to satisfy the Company's obligations
under the Lampert Agreement in the event of Mr. Lampert's death. The Company
currently maintains $5 million in key life insurance on the life of Mr. Lampert.
F-28
If Mr. Lampert's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or if
there is a constructive termination without cause, Mr. Lampert would be entitled
to receive the Accrued Amounts, his base salary and continuation of his benefits
(or the economic equivalent of such benefits), the Additional Life and
Disability Insurance and certain perquisites for the scheduled balance of the
term and for an additional twelve months thereafter, and a prorated bonus for
the year in which the termination occurred. If such termination followed a
change of control of the Company, Mr. Lampert would be entitled to receive the
salary continuation benefit as a lump sum payment without any discount and,
subject to limited exceptions, any benefits, including options, in which he is
not at such time fully vested would become fully vested and any options would
remain exercisable for the full stated term of the option. If the automatic
extensions of the term of the Lampert Agreement are discontinued at the request
of the Company and Mr. Lampert's employment is terminated upon expiration of the
term, Mr. Lampert would be entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts, his base
salary and continuation of his benefits (or the economic equivalent of such
benefits), the Additional Life and Disability Insurance and certain perquisites
for twelve months after the end of the term, and a prorated bonus for the year
in which the termination occurred. In addition, if the severance payments to Mr.
Lampert under the Lampert Agreement follow a change in control and, together
with other amounts paid to Mr. Lampert, exceed certain threshold amounts and are
determined to constitute a parachute payment (as defined in Section 280G(b)(2)
of the Internal Revenue Code), Mr. Lampert is to receive an additional amount to
cover the federal excise tax with respect thereto on a "grossed up" basis.
If Ira B. Lampert is terminated for cause, or he voluntarily resigns, he will
only receive the Accrued Amounts and benefits provided in benefit plans.
The Company also has employment agreements with its other executive officers
that provide for annual salaries ranging from approximately $177,450 to
$450,000, plus certain other fringe benefits. These agreements prohibit the
executives from competing with the Company for one year following termination of
employment with the Company. Each agreement contains, among other things,
termination provisions that may result in the Company being obligated to make
severance payments equal to one year's base salary plus certain other fringe
benefits.
Pursuant to the Lampert Agreement, the Company adopted a supplemental executive
retirement plan and agreement (a "SERP") for the benefit of Ira B. Lampert (the
"Lampert SERP"). A specified amount, currently $500,000, is credited to the
Lampert SERP account each year. These yearly credits are 100% vested and not
subject to forfeiture. Pursuant to a one-time grant to Mr. Lampert of $1,549,999
in deferred compensation, made as of April 19, 2000, that amount was added to
the Lampert SERP. It vested in three equal annual installments beginning January
1, 2001 and, as such, became fully vested on January 1, 2003.
In addition to the Lampert SERP, in connection with grants of deferred
compensation to its executive officers, the Company has adopted various SERPs
for the benefit of those executives. A total of $1,915,000 has been contributed
to the executive SERPs (other than the Lampert SERP), which range from $100,000
to $750,000 per executive, before giving effect to the Deferred LTCIP Awards
that will be added to the SERP of those executive officers who were granted a
Deferred LTCIP Award on August 6, 2003. Generally, the amounts in the executive
SERPs vest in installments over a period of not less than three years, subject
to the executive's continued employment, and most provide for accelerated
vesting, in whole or in part, if the executive's employment is terminated by the
Company without cause. Additionally two executive officers have elected to defer
compensation from time to time, pursuant to their respective deferral agreements
with the Company.
Each time the Company credits an executive's account under a SERP or deferral
agreement, the Company simultaneously contributes an equal amount to a trust
established for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy the obligations
incurred by the Company pursuant to the same.
SERP and other deferred compensation account balances, including investment
earnings, are recorded as a deferred compensation asset and the related vested
balances are recorded as a deferred compensation liability. See Note 7, "Other
Assets," and Note 10, "Other Liabilities," of the accompanying Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
License and Royalty Agreements
On August 26, 2002, the Company entered into two Polaroid licensing agreements.
The two license agreements provide for the exclusive (with the exception of
products already released by Polaroid into the distribution chain), worldwide
use by the Company of the Polaroid brand trademark in connection with the
manufacture, distribution, promotion and sale of single use cameras and
traditional film based cameras, including zoom cameras, and certain related
accessories. The licenses do not include instant or digital cameras. Each
license includes an initial term of three and a half years and may be renewed
under the same economic terms at the Company's option, for an additional
three-year period. Each license agreement provides for the payment by the
Company of $3.0 million of minimum royalties, or $6.0 million in total, which
will be fully credited against percentage royalties. Pursuant to the terms of
the license agreements, in August 2002, the Company paid a total of $4.0
million, which represented $2.0 million for each license agreement, as partial
payment of the minimum royalties and has recorded these payments as prepaid
assets. These assets are amortized based on a percentage of sales. Additionally,
the Company has recorded the remaining $2.0 million future minimum royalty
payments as a liability.
F-29
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company entered into a new twenty-year license
agreement with Fuji Photo Film Ltd ("Fuji"). Under the new license agreement,
Fuji granted to the Company a worldwide (excluding Japan until January 1, 2005)
non-exclusive license to use certain of Fuji's patents and patent applications
related to single-use cameras. In consideration of the license, Concord agreed
to pay a license fee and certain royalty payments to Fuji. Accordingly, a
significant portion of the balance for patents, trademarks and licenses, net in
"Other assets" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at June 28, 2003
and June 29, 2002 was an asset associated with the Fuji license. Concord has
also recorded as a liability a corresponding amount that was included in
licensing related obligations in "Other liabilities" in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets at June 28, 2003, and June 29, 2002 which was equal
to the present value of future license fee payments. Because these recorded
amounts were the result of a non-cash transaction, they are not reflected in the
changes in "Other assets" and "Other liabilities" in the accompanying
consolidated statement of cash flow for Fiscal 2001. These assets are amortized
based on quantities of units produced.
Additionally, the Company has other license and royalty agreements that require
the payment of royalties based on the manufacture and/or sale of certain
products. The Company's license and royalty agreements expire at various dates
through Fiscal 2021. Total amortization and royalty expense for all licensing
and royalty agreements for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001 was $4.5
million, $4.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
Purchase Commitment
At June 28, 2003, the Company has a $2.0 million purchase commitment to procure
a certain quantity of material from a vendor.
Indemnification
At June 28, 2003, the Company has an indemnification agreement with a certain
third party to reimburse it for legal costs incurred by this party in connection
with the securities class action against the Company. As of June 28, 2003, the
Company has accrued $0.2 million related to such indemnification and is
classified in "Accrued expenses" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
See Note 16, "Litigation and Settlements," of the accompanying Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred Long Term Compensation
On August 6, 2003, certain executive officers were awarded $1.9 million in the
aggregate of contingent deferred compensation, which is not yet earned or
vested, under the Company's Amended and Restated 2002 Long-Term Cash Incentive
Plan (the "LTCIP") with respect to the Fiscal 2002-2003 performance period (the
"Deferred LTCIP Awards"). The Deferred LTCIP Awards vest, so long as the
executive continues to be employed by the Company, in three equal annual
installments on August 6, 2004, 2005 and 2006, or immediately upon: (i) a change
of control of the Company; or (ii) the executive's death or disability. The
Deferred LTCIP Award granted to Ira B. Lampert has substantially the same terms
and conditions as the other Deferred LTCIP Awards, however, in addition to the
events that will accelerate the vesting of the other Deferred LTCIP Awards, it
provides for immediate vesting in the event of termination without cause, a
constructive termination of employment without cause, or the non-renewal of his
employment contract. The Lampert SERP and the SERPs of other executives to whom
Deferred LTCIP Awards were granted are being amended to include appropriate
terms to govern the Deferred LTCIP Awards. Once the relevant SERPs have been
amended, the Company will contribute the foregoing amounts to trusts established
for the purpose of holding funds to satisfy the Company's obligations under the
Deferred LTCIP Awards. The Company expenses the Deferred LTCIP Awards over the
vesting period.
F-30
NOTE 16 - LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENTS:
In July 2002, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain
of its officers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida by individuals purporting to be shareholders of the Company. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on August 30, 2002. The complaint was
dismissed by the Court in December 2002 in response to the motion to dismiss
filed by the Company. In January 2003, an amended class action complaint (the
"Amended Complaint") was filed adding certain of the Company's current and
former directors as defendants. The lead plaintiffs in the Amended Complaint
seek to act as representatives of a class consisting of all persons who
purchased the Company's Common Stock (i) issued pursuant to the Company's
September 26, 2000 secondary offering (the "Secondary Offering") or (ii) during
the period from September 26, 2000 through June 22, 2001, inclusive (the "Class
Period"). The Amended Complaint asserts, among other things, that the Company
made untrue statements of material fact and omitted to state material facts
necessary to make statements made not misleading in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus issued in connection with the Secondary Offering, in periodic
reports it filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in press
releases it made to the public regarding its operations and financial results.
The allegations are centered around claims that the Company failed to disclose
that the transaction with then customer, KB Gear Interactive, Inc. ("KB Gear"),
was a highly risky transaction, claims that throughout the Class Period the
Company failed to disclose that a large portion of its accounts receivable was
represented by a delinquent and uncollectible balance due from then customer, KB
Gear, and claims that such failures artificially inflated the price of the
Common Stock. The Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages, interest,
attorneys' fees, costs of suit and unspecified other and further relief from the
court. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit and filed a motion
to dismiss the Amended Complaint on April 18, 2003. The lawsuit is in the
earliest stage and discovery has not yet commenced. Although the Company
believes this lawsuit is without merit, its outcome cannot be predicted, and if
adversely determined, the ultimate liability of the Company, which could be
material, cannot be ascertained. On September 17, 2002, the Company was advised
by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission that it is conducting an
informal inquiry related to the matters described above. On October 15, 2002,
the staff of Nasdaq requested certain information and materials related to the
matters described above and as to matters related to the previously reported
embezzlement of Company funds by a former employee, uncovered in April 2002.
In May 2003, a related class action complaint was filed against the Company and
certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida. This second class action contains allegations which are the
same or similar to the allegations of the previously existing class action
described above. In view of the procedural history of the existing class action,
the Company questions the propriety of this second class action and has so
notified counsel for the plaintiffs in the second action. The Company has not
been served with this related class action complaint. On September 8, 2003, the
Court issued an Order requiring the plaintiff's, on or before September 12,
2003, to show cause why the second class action should not be dismissed for
failure to serve the complaint upon the defendants within the 120 day period
prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In its Order, the Court
stated that the plaintiff's failure to show cause will result in dismissal of
the complaint without prejudice. If it is not dismissed by the Court, the
Company intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. The lawsuit is in the
earliest stage and discovery has not yet commenced. Although the Company
believes this lawsuit is without merit, its outcome cannot be predicted, and if
adversely determined, the ultimate liability of the Company, which could be
material, cannot be ascertained.
As previously reported, a patent infringement complaint was filed by the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Electronics for Imaging, Inc. against
214 defendants, including the Company, in April 2002 in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. A settlement has been reached
between the Company and the plaintiff in this matter. The settlement is not
material and does not have a material adverse effect on our financial position
or results of operations.
F-31
The Company is involved from time to time in routine legal matters incidental to
its business. In the opinion of our management, the resolution of such matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of
operations.
NOTE 17 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
On May 1, 2002, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with William J.
Lloyd, a member of the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Lloyd
provided consulting services to the Company on an as needed basis in exchange
for a $5,000 per month retainer payable at the end of each calendar month and
reimbursement of all reasonable business expenses. The term of the agreement was
to continue from May 1, 2002 until terminated by either party. The Company
accepted Mr. Lloyd's resignation from the Board of Directors, effective July 31,
2003, and his consulting agreement was terminated effective June 15, 2003.
A corporation controlled by J. David Hakman provided consulting services to the
Company from 1997 to July 2002 pursuant to an engagement agreement entered into
on September 25, 1997, as later amended and supplemented (the "Hakman
Agreement"). Pursuant to the Hakman Agreement, the Company granted a warrant to
purchase up to 260,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.25 per
share to the corporation controlled by Mr. Hakman. In October 2000, the
corporation exercised the warrant as to all 113,000 shares that had vested up
until that time. On September 25, 2002, the corporation exercised the warrant as
to another 77, 000 shares that were vested and exercisable at that time. The
warrant never vested as to the remaining 70,000 shares and expired on September
25, 2002.
NOTE 18 - OTHER ITEMS
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company favorably resolved a
disputed claim with a DMS customer. Over the course of a 30-month DMS supply
agreement, which expired in January 2002, the Company recorded certain accrued
assets and liabilities. The favorable resolution resulted in a reversal of these
accrued assets and liabilities with a corresponding reduction of cost of
products sold of $2.2 million recorded in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations for Fiscal 2003.
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company recognized a provision for
inventory of approximately $2.3 million principally related to the
rationalization of sub-one megapixel digital inventory comprised of components
and finished goods. The Company recorded the provision for inventory in cost of
products sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for
Fiscal 2002.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a $1.0 million
accounts receivable provision related to Kmart Corporation which filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on January 22, 2002. In
the third quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a recovery of
approximately $0.3 million associated with the sale to a third party of the
Kmart Corporation accounts receivable. The initial provision for doubtful
accounts recorded in the second quarter of Fiscal 2002 and subsequent recovery
in the third quarter of Fiscal 2002 were included in general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying statements of operations for Fiscal 2002.
During the first quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company recognized a provision
related to accounts receivable of $1.6 million, and a provision related to
inventory of $1.8 million. Both of these provisions related to Polaroid
Corporation ("Polaroid"), which filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code on October 12, 2001, and were included in general and
administrative expenses and cost of products sold, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for Fiscal 2002. As a result
of inventory sales to Polaroid, in the third quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company
recorded approximately $0.8 million of income by reducing part of the $1.8
million provision. In the first quarter of Fiscal 2003, in settlement of
Concord's outstanding claims related to the Polaroid bankruptcy, the Company
recorded as a reduction of general and administrative expenses a $0.5 million
payment.
F-32
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001, the Company recognized a provision for
doubtful accounts of approximately $15.8 million, and a provision for inventory
of approximately $2.7 million. These provisions related to a former DMS customer
and were included in general and administrative expense and cost of products
sold, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for Fiscal 2001. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001, the Company
recorded a $2.0 million provision resulting from inventory written down to the
lower of cost or market value. These costs were included in cost of products
sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for Fiscal 2001.
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001, the Company announced a restructuring
and cost containment initiative ("Restructuring Initiative"), which consisted of
facilities consolidation, the closure of the Company's single use camera short
run labeling facility in the United States, and the termination of approximately
71 employees primarily employed in manufacturing, engineering, sales and
marketing and administration functions. The Company also reduced its
manufacturing workforce in the PRC by approximately 2,000 workers. The
Restructuring Initiative was fully implemented by the end of Fiscal 2002.
Initial costs accrued for the Restructuring Initiative were approximately $1.4
million which were comprised of approximately $0.4 million related to the
closure of facilities and approximately $1.0 million related to personnel
redundancy costs. During Fiscal 2002 the Company implemented elements of its
Restructuring Initiative and incurred approximately $0.8 million and $0.2
million, respectively, in payments related to personnel redundancy costs and
facilities consolidation. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2002, the Company
reversed its remaining accrual balance of $0.4 million by recording a
corresponding reduction in cost of products sold and general and administrative
expenses in the amounts of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
NOTE 19 - RECOVERY OF OPERATING EXPENSES, NET:
In April 2002, the Company uncovered a fraudulent scheme including check forgery
by a former employee, which resulted in the embezzlement of approximately $1.3
million over an eighteen-month period ending in April 2002, the preponderance of
which occurred in Fiscal 2002. The Company's investigation confirmed that the
former employee acted alone and the misappropriated funds have been identified.
The Company has recovered all but $0.1 million of the embezzlement from a
combination of insurance proceeds, assets secured and assets to be recovered
from the individual. Accordingly, the Company has recorded accrued receivables,
net of cash recoveries, of $0.1 million and $1.2 million in prepaid expenses and
other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June
28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded
under the caption "(Recovery) of operating expenses, net" in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations for Fiscal 2002, $1.2 million related to
the recovery, which is net of $0.1 million of expenses related to the
investigation and recovery efforts. The entire amount of the recovery was
recorded in the third quarter of Fiscal 2002 due to the fact that it was
impractical to determine the impact on Fiscal 2002 quarterly periods. The
embezzled amounts relating to the prior fiscal year were not significant.
NOTE 20 - TERMINATED ACQUISITION COSTS:
Terminated acquisition costs of $0.8 million for Fiscal 2001 were related to a
proposed acquisition that was not consummated. Negotiations regarding this
acquisition were terminated in September 2000.
F-33
NOTE 21 - OTHER (INCOME), NET:
(in thousands)
Included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations under the
caption, other (income), net is the following:
June 28, June 29, June 30,
2003 2002 2001
----------- ----------- -----------
Investment income $ (1,527) $ (2,351) $ (5,123)
Arbitration award - (1,178) -
Foreign currency (gain), net (1,406) (193) (348)
Other expenses, net 561 662 579
----------- ----------- -----------
Other (income), net $ (2,372) $ (3,060) $ (4,892)
=========== =========== ===========
NOTE 22 - GEOGRAPHIC AREA INFORMATION:
Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of a Business Enterprise and
Related Information, the Company is required to report segment information.
Since the Company operates in only one business segment, imaging equipment, and
sells only one type of product, image capture devices, no additional segment
reporting is required. SFAS No. 131 also requires certain revenue disclosures of
geographic information based on the Company's determination as to which regions
such revenues were attributed. Accordingly, for purposes of this disclosure, the
Company attributed RSD sales to the region where the customer's home office was
located and all DMS sales were attributed to Asia. A summary of selected
financial information regarding the Company's geographic operations (the
Americas consist of the United States, Canada, and Latin America; Europe
consists of the United Kingdom and the other countries in the European Union;
Asia consists of Hong Kong and the PRC) is set forth below:
Year Ended
----------------------------------------
Sales made to unaffiliated customers: June 28, June 29, June 30,
(in thousands) 2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------ -----------
Americas $ 101,866 $ 68,703 $ 56,840
Europe 41,677 26,257 26,315
Asia 46,240 34,357 96,906
------------- ------------ -----------
Total $ 189,783 $ 129,317 $ 180,061
============= ============ ===========
Identifiable assets: June 28, June 29,
(in thousands) 2003 2002
------------- -----------
Americas $ 126,622 $ 139,722
Europe 17,837 9,284
Asia 61,355 49,070
------------- ----------
Total $ 205,814 $ 198,076
============= ==========
In Fiscal 2003, each of the following customers accounted for at least 10% of
net sales: Walgreen Co. ("Walgreens"), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart") and
Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak"). These companies represented the Company's three
largest customers generating net sales in Fiscal 2003 of approximately $36.3
million (19.1% of total net sales), $32.7 million (17.2% of total net sales) and
$29.7 million (15.6% of total net sales), respectively. The loss of any one of
these customers or significantly reduced sales to these customers could have a
material adverse impact on results of operations.
F-34
In Fiscal 2002, each of the following customers accounted for at least 10% of
consolidated net sales: Walgreens and Wal-Mart. These companies represented the
Company's largest customers generating net sales of approximately $25.4 million
(19.6% of total net sales) and $24.0 million (18.6% of total net sales),
respectively.
In Fiscal 2001, each of the following customers accounted for at least 10% of
consolidated net sales: KB Gear, (former customer), Walgreens, and Kodak. Net
sales to these companies were approximately $26.2 million (14.6% of total net
sales), $25.9 million (14.4% of total net sales) and $22.6 million (12.6% of
total net sales), respectively.
No other customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales during
Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002 or Fiscal 2001.
NOTE 23 - QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED):
(in thousands)
Quarter Ended
------------------------------------------------------------
Sept. 28, Dec. 28, Mar. 29, June 28,
2002 2002 2003 2003
----------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Net sales $ 30,182 $ 61,840 $ 36,246 $ 61,515
Gross profit 7,722 9,468 8,392 10,669
Income before income taxes 1,230 2,545 1,397 1,800
Net income 1,391 2,085 1,257 1,670
Basic earnings per share $ 0.05 $ 0.07 $ 0.05 $ 0.06
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.05 $ 0.07 $ 0.04 $ 0.06
Quarter Ended
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sept. 29, Dec. 29, Mar. 30, June 29,
2001 2001 2002 2002
----------- ----------- ------------- ------------
Net sales $ 32,887 $ 39,266 $ 26,422 $ 30,742
Gross profit 5,744 7,328 1,807 4,093
(Loss) income before income taxes (1,438) (1,414) (3,965) 166
Net (loss) income (1,269) (1,555) (3,348) 924
Basic earnings (loss) per share $ (0.04) $ (0.06) $ (0.12) $ 0.03
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ (0.04) $ (0.06) $ (0.12) $ 0.03
See Note 18, "Other Items," for a description of items that had a significant
effect on certain quarters.
F-35
Schedule II
CONCORD CAMERA CORP.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(in thousands)
Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
Additions
---------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance
beginning of costs and other at end
Description period expenses accounts Deductions of period
---------------- -------------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -----------
1. Provisions for doubtful accounts, discounts, returns and allowances
Fiscal Year:
2001 $ 425 278 - - $ 703
2002 $ 703 1,889 - - $ 2,592
2003 $ 2,592 519 - - $ 3,111
Note: This schedule does not include approximately $15,800,000 related to a
write-off recorded in Fiscal 2001.
2. Deferred tax valuation allowance
Fiscal Year:
2001 $ - 2,181 - - $ 2,181
2002 $ 2,181 - - 1,027 $ 1,154
2003 $ 1,154 - 162 790 $ 526
F-36