UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-32651
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 52-1165937 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
One Liberty Plaza New York, New York | 10006 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 401-8700
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Outstanding at July 31, 2006 | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share |
111,655,532 shares |
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
INDEX
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes market share and industry data that we obtained from industry publications and surveys, reports of governmental agencies, and internal company surveys. Industry publications and surveys generally state that the information they contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Statements as to our market position are based on most currently available market data. For market comparison purposes, data in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for initial public offerings, or IPOs, of companies in the United States is based on data provided by Thomson Financial, which does not include best efforts underwritings and we have chosen to exclude closed-end funds, therefore, the data may not be comparable to other publicly-available initial public offering data. Data in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for secondary offerings is also based on data provided by Thomson Financial. Data in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for new listings of equity securities on The Nasdaq Stock Market is based on data generated internally by us, which includes best efforts underwritings and issuers that switched from other listing venues. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding industry data presented herein, our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and Item 1. BusinessRisk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Trademarks and Servicemarks
ACES®, ENASTRAQ®, Market Intelligence Desk®, Market Mechanics®, MarketSite®, MarketSite Experience®, NASDAQ®, NASDAQ Biotechnology Index®, NASDAQ Canada®, NASDAQ Canada Index®, NASDAQ Capital Market®, NASDAQ Composite®, NASDAQ Composite Index®, NASDAQ Computer Index®,
i
NASDAQ DepthView®, NASDAQ Europe Composite Index®, NASDAQ-Financial®, NASDAQ-Financial Index®, NASDAQ Industrial Index®, NASDAQ Market Center®, NASDAQ MarketSite®, NASDAQ National Market®, NASDAQ PostData®, NASDAQ PowerView®, NASDAQ Prime®, NASDAQ Report Source®, NASDAQ Telecommunications Index®, NASDAQ TotalView®, NASDAQ Trader®, NASDAQ Volume Post®, NASDAQ Workstation®, NASDAQ Workstation II®, NASDAQ-100®, NASDAQ-100 European Tracker®, NASDAQ-100 Index®, NASDAQ-100 Index Tracking Stock®, NASTRAQ®, NDX®, Opening New Worlds®, QQQ®, SelectNet®, SuperMontage®, The NASDAQ Stock Market®, The Stock Market For The Next 100 Years®, and NASDAQ/NMS® are registered trademarks of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
ACTSM, Aggregated Depth at PriceSM (ADAPSM), Automated Confirmation Transaction ServiceSM, Closing CrossSM, CubesSM, EQ FundSM, EQQQSM, FlashQuotesSM, INETSM, InfoQuotesSM, Level 1 ServiceSM, LogoTicker, Market ForcesSM, MarketLinkSM, Market VelocitySM, Mutual Fund Quotation ServiceSM (MFQSSM), NASDAQ Competitive VWAPSM, NASDAQ Corporate Services NetworkSM NASDAQ Global MarketSM, NASDAQ Global SelectSM, NASDAQ Index WatchSM, NASDAQ InternationalSM, NASDAQ Market AnalytixSM, NASDAQ Market ForcesSM , NASDAQ MaxSM, NASDAQ Market VelocitySM, NASDAQ National Market CompositeSM, NASDAQ OnlineSM, NASDAQ Quotation Dissemination ServiceSM (NQDSSM), NASDAQ QuoteViewSM, NASDAQ Trade Dissemination ServiceSM (NTDSSM), NASDAQ Trade UpSM, NWIISM, Opening CrossSM, The CubeSM, Trade Reporting and Compliance EngineSM (TRACESM), Trade UpSM, UTP Quotation Data FeedSM (UQDFSM), UTP Trade Report Data FeedSM (UTDFSM) and the logos identifying Nasdaq indexes and products are servicemarks of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Forward-Looking Statements
The SEC encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so that investors can better understand a companys future prospects and make informed investment decisions. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains these types of statements. Words such as anticipates, estimates, expects, projects, intends, plans, believes and words or terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating results or financial performance identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
| our operating results may be lower than expected; |
| our ability to implement our strategic initiatives and any consequences from our pursuit of our corporate strategy, including our integration of INET and our acquisition of an approximate 25.3% stake in the London Stock Exchange Group plc; |
| competition, economic, political and market conditions and fluctuations, including interest rate risk; |
| government and industry regulation; and |
| adverse changes that may occur in the securities markets generally. |
Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the uncertainty and any risk related to forward-looking statements that we make. These risk factors are more fully described under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and Item 1. Business-Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should carefully read this entire Form 10-Q, including Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes. Except as required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. For any forward-looking statements contained in any document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
ii
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Market Services |
$ | 347,587 | $ | 163,626 | $ | 684,888 | $ | 288,741 | ||||||||
Issuer Services |
63,380 | 56,060 | 122,258 | 110,965 | ||||||||||||
Other |
65 | | 332 | 173 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
411,032 | 219,686 | 807,478 | 399,879 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Liquidity rebates |
(170,633 | ) | (69,180 | ) | (337,831 | ) | (104,555 | ) | ||||||||
Brokerage, clearance and exchange fees |
(69,248 | ) | (20,045 | ) | (136,479 | ) | (38,585 | ) | ||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
(239,881 | ) | (89,225 | ) | (474,310 | ) | (143,140 | ) | ||||||||
Gross margin |
171,151 | 130,461 | 333,168 | 256,739 | ||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
48,018 | 36,902 | 96,886 | 74,214 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
3,820 | 2,026 | 8,851 | 3,372 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,471 | 14,933 | 46,019 | 33,126 | ||||||||||||
Professional and contract services |
7,299 | 6,972 | 16,202 | 14,023 | ||||||||||||
Computer operations and data communications |
10,264 | 15,945 | 20,216 | 32,104 | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
1,843 | (745 | ) | 1,892 | (174 | ) | ||||||||||
Occupancy |
8,208 | 7,082 | 16,185 | 14,159 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
24,793 | 10,582 | 31,555 | 16,022 | ||||||||||||
Total direct expenses |
125,716 | 93,697 | 237,806 | 186,846 | ||||||||||||
Support costs from related parties, net |
9,105 | 10,441 | 17,222 | 20,812 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
134,821 | 104,138 | 255,028 | 207,658 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
36,330 | 26,323 | 78,140 | 49,081 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
6,275 | 3,097 | 10,753 | 4,522 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(24,406 | ) | (4,634 | ) | (40,850 | ) | (7,496 | ) | ||||||||
Dividend income |
9,223 | | 9,223 | | ||||||||||||
Minority interest |
317 | | 453 | | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
27,739 | 24,786 | 57,719 | 46,107 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
11,095 | 10,815 | 23,087 | 19,365 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,644 | $ | 13,971 | $ | 34,632 | $ | 26,742 | ||||||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,644 | $ | 13,971 | $ | 34,632 | $ | 26,742 | ||||||||
Preferred stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| (785 | ) | (359 | ) | (1,790 | ) | |||||||||
Accretion of preferred stock |
| (1,459 | ) | (331 | ) | (2,387 | ) | |||||||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
$ | 16,644 | $ | 11,727 | $ | 33,942 | $ | 22,565 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and par value amounts)
June 30, 2006 |
December 31, 2005 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 488,817 | $ | 165,237 | ||||
Available-for-sale investments, at fair value |
1,215,525 | 179,369 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
234,395 | 207,632 | ||||||
Receivables from related parties |
90 | 18 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
14,324 | 9,953 | ||||||
Other current assets |
35,537 | 34,754 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,988,688 | 596,963 | ||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
Land, buildings and improvements |
31,649 | 60,920 | ||||||
Data processing equipment and software |
180,583 | 179,991 | ||||||
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements |
104,977 | 115,551 | ||||||
317,209 | 356,462 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(222,904 | ) | (233,886 | ) | ||||
Total property and equipment, net |
94,305 | 122,576 | ||||||
Non-current deferred tax assets |
124,267 | 133,336 | ||||||
Goodwill |
988,277 | 961,893 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
207,251 | 215,478 | ||||||
Other assets |
12,446 | 16,540 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,415,234 | $ | 2,046,786 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 112,092 | $ | 118,884 | ||||
Accrued personnel costs |
36,166 | 55,284 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
114,869 | 53,593 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
56,456 | 61,849 | ||||||
Current portion of debt obligations |
11,848 | 7,500 | ||||||
Payables to related parties |
9,798 | 28,218 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
341,229 | 325,328 | ||||||
Debt obligations |
1,612,565 | 1,184,928 | ||||||
Accrued pension costs |
24,641 | 25,841 | ||||||
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
89,221 | 95,151 | ||||||
Non-current deferred revenue |
98,618 | 92,019 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
69,624 | 69,514 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
2,235,898 | 1,792,781 | ||||||
Minority interest |
545 | 998 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, shares issued: 130,708,873 at June 30, 2006 and 130,684,783 at December 31, 2005; shares outstanding: 111,620,480 at June 30, 2006 and 83,148,909 at December 31, 2005 |
1,308 | 1,307 | ||||||
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized, Series D preferred stock: $1.00 par value, 1 share issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005; Series C Cumulative preferred stock: 953,470 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
| 95,017 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,039,229 | 383,669 | ||||||
Common stock in treasury, at cost: 19,088,393 shares at June 30, 2006 and 47,535,874 shares at December 31, 2005 |
(249,594 | ) | (613,369 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(31,888 | ) | (1,290 | ) | ||||
Deferred stock compensation |
| (4,930 | ) | |||||
Common stock issuable |
| 6,809 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
419,736 | 385,794 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,178,791 | 253,007 | ||||||
Total liabilities, minority interest and stockholders equity |
$ | 3,415,234 | $ | 2,046,786 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||
Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,632 | $ | 26,742 | ||||
Non-cash items included in net income: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
46,019 | 33,126 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
5,444 | 780 | ||||||
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation |
(18,991 | ) | (2,802 | ) | ||||
Provision for bad debts |
1,892 | (174 | ) | |||||
Loss on the early extinguishment and refinancing of debt obligations |
20,884 | 7,393 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
(1,351 | ) | (1,728 | ) | ||||
Loss on write down of assets held-for-sale |
5,407 | | ||||||
Foreign currency gain related to investment in the LSE |
(8,197 | ) | | |||||
Other non-cash items included in net income |
913 | 2,240 | ||||||
Net change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(3,561 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Receivables from related parties |
(72 | ) | 3,210 | |||||
Other assets |
(13,065 | ) | (12,763 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(4,534 | ) | 2,262 | |||||
Accrued personnel costs |
(19,486 | ) | (21,479 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
66,091 | 60,137 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
(13,761 | ) | (3,320 | ) | ||||
Payables to related parties |
(9,068 | ) | (1,102 | ) | ||||
Accrued pension costs |
(1,200 | ) | 3,359 | |||||
Other liabilities |
(710 | ) | (853 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
87,286 | 95,001 | ||||||
Cash flow from investing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from redemptions of available-for-sale investments |
392,395 | 209,655 | ||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investments, net of capital return from the LSE |
(1,479,786 | ) | (265,064 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the maturities of available-for-sale investments |
28,750 | 13,100 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity investments |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments |
| (2,984 | ) | |||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired |
(38,060 | ) | 3,063 | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(5,989 | ) | (9,032 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
298 | 17,974 | ||||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(1,102,392 | ) | (30,288 | ) | ||||
Cash flow from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from debt obligations |
1,850,000 | 205,000 | ||||||
Payments of debt obligations |
(1,418,204 | ) | | |||||
Net proceeds from equity offerings |
972,719 | | ||||||
Series C Cumulative preferred stock redemptions and dividends |
(105,059 | ) | (40,354 | ) | ||||
Issuances of common stock, net of treasury stock purchases |
20,239 | 16,741 | ||||||
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation |
18,991 | | ||||||
Cash provided by financing activities |
1,338,686 | 181,387 | ||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
323,580 | 246,100 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
165,237 | 58,186 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 488,817 | $ | 304,286 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Unless otherwise noted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q , the terms Nasdaq, we, us and our refer to The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. We are responsible for the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this document. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation, have been reflected. Revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be representative of those for the full year. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
We have condensed or omitted footnotes or other financial information that are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, but are not required for interim reports. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current years presentation.
2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees including employee stock options, restricted stock and certain employee stock purchase plans, based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes our previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, or APB 25. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, or SAB 107, relating to SFAS 123(R). We have applied the provisions of SAB 107 in our adoption of SFAS 123(R).
We adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method and have recognized share-based compensation cost in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. We recognize compensation expense for share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). We recognized share-based compensation expense of $2.7 million under SFAS 123(R) for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and included these amounts in compensation and benefits expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognized share-based compensation expense of $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, which was related to restricted stock awards we had been expensing under previous accounting standards. We did not recognize any share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. See Note 10, Share-Based Compensation, for further discussion.
SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the consolidated statements of income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for share-based awards using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25 as allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Share-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123. Under the intrinsic value method, we did not recognize any share-based compensation expense, other than as related to restricted stock awards, because the exercise price of our stock options granted to employees and directors equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.
4
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Share-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted before, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted after January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). We based our share-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 on awards that we expect to ultimately vest, reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires us to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise our estimate, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from our estimates. In our pro forma information required under SFAS 123 for the periods before January 1, 2006, we accounted for forfeitures as required under SFAS 123(R).
On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3 Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. We elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to SFAS 123(R). The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool, or APIC pool, related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee share-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123(R).
3. Business Combinations
Purchase AcquisitionShareholder.com
In February 2006, we acquired Shareholder.com, a privately held, Massachusetts-based firm specializing in shareholder communications and investor relations intelligence services, for $40.0 million in cash, subject to post-closing adjustments. We operate Shareholder.com as a wholly-owned subsidiary and it is included in our Issuers Services segment. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operating results from the date of acquisition.
The following table presents a summary of the Shareholder.com acquisition:
Purchase |
Total Net (Liabilities) Acquired |
Purchased Intangible Assets |
Goodwill | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
$ 40,000 |
$ | (2,069 | ) | $ | 10,159 | $ | 31,910 |
We will finalize the purchase price allocation for the Shareholder.com acquisition within one year from the purchase date. We expect future adjustments related to taxes and settlement of post-closing adjustments. See Note 4, Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets, for further discussion.
5
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The following table presents the details of the purchased intangible assets acquired in the Shareholder.com acquisition. All purchased intangible assets are amortized over the straight-line method.
Technology |
Customer Relationships |
Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||
Estimated |
Amount |
Estimated Useful Life (in Years) |
Amount |
Estimated Useful Life (in Years) |
Amount |
Amount | |||||||||||
(in thousands, except years) | |||||||||||||||||
5 |
$ | 959 | 11 | $ | 6,800 | Indefinite | $ | 2,400 | (1) | $ | 10,159 |
(1) | Represents the Shareholder.com trade name which we determined to have an indefinite estimated useful life. |
Pro Forma Financial Information for Previous Acquisition
On December 8, 2005, we acquired INET. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operating results of INET from the date of acquisition. Unaudited pro forma combined historical results to reflect INET for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are included in the table below. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the unaudited pro forma historical results combine the historical condensed consolidated statements of income of Nasdaq and INET, giving effect to the INET acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2005. We also acquired Shareholder.com in 2006 and Carpenter Moore in 2005, but have not included results from these businesses in these pro forma results as these acquisitions were not considered significant under Regulation S-X.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 324,047 | $ | 618,017 | ||
Gross margin |
155,517 | 310,139 | ||||
Net income |
17,273 | 25,837 | ||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
15,029 | 21,660 | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.27 | ||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.25 |
The pro forma results include amortization of purchased intangible assets and the elimination of intercompany transactions had Nasdaq and INET acted as a combined company. The pro forma results also include additional interest expense recorded for the debt incurred and restructured in connection with the financing of the INET acquisition, which included: (1) the issuance of $205 million convertible notes to Silver Lake Partners, II, L.P., or SLP, ($145.0 million) and Hellman & Friedman Capital Partners IV, L.P., or H&F, ($60.0 million) on April 22, 2005, (2) the restructuring of the $240 million convertible notes issued to H&F (including a $7.4 million pre-tax loss on the restructuring) and (3) the issuance of the $750 million senior term debt. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of 2005, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results.
6
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
4. Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following table presents the changes in goodwill by segment during the six months ended June 30, 2006:
Market Services |
Issuers Services |
Total |
|||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
$ | 941,275 | $ | 20,618 | $ | 961,893 | |||||
Goodwill acquired |
| 31,910 | 31,910 | ||||||||
Purchase accounting adjustments |
(5,822 | ) | 296 | (5,526 | ) | ||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
$ | 935,453 | $ | 52,824 | $ | 988,277 | |||||
The net increase in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily relates to the acquisition of Shareholder.com and purchase accounting adjustments related to the acquisitions of INET, Carpenter Moore and Shareholder.com.
Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents details of our total purchased intangible assets both finite and indefinite lived:
June 30, 2006 |
December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Intangible Assets |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Intangible Assets | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Technology |
$ | 27,059 | $ | (13,980 | ) | $ | 13,079 | $ | 26,100 | $ | (4,108 | ) | $ | 21,992 | ||||||
Customer relationships |
202,400 | (12,441 | ) | 189,959 | 196,400 | (4,775 | ) | 191,625 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5,170 | (957 | ) | 4,213 | 1,970 | (109 | ) | 1,861 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 234,629 | $ | (27,378 | ) | $ | 207,251 | $ | 224,470 | $ | (8,992 | ) | $ | 215,478 | ||||||
The estimated future amortization expense of our purchased intangible assets at June 30, 2006 is as follows:
(in thousands) | |||
2006 |
$ | 12,566 | |
2007 |
18,852 | ||
2008 |
18,674 | ||
2009 |
18,643 | ||
2010 and thereafter |
136,116 | ||
Total |
$ | 204,851 | |
7
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The changes in net purchased intangible assets by segment during the six months ended June 30, 2006 were as follows:
Market Services |
Issuers Services |
Total |
||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
$ | 206,207 | $ | 9,271 | $ | 215,478 | ||||||
Intangible assets acquired |
| 10,159 | 10,159 | |||||||||
Amortization expense |
(17,605 | ) | (781 | ) | (18,386 | ) | ||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
$ | 188,602 | $ | 18,649 | $ | 207,251 | ||||||
5. 2006 and 2005 Cost Reduction Program, INET Integration and Strategic Review
Cost Reduction Program and INET Integration
We incurred charges of approximately $17.9 million in the second quarter of 2006 and approximately $31.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 in connection with actions we took to improve our operational efficiency as well as to integrate INET. We incurred charges of approximately $5.9 million in the second quarter of 2005 and approximately $13.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 in connection with actions we took to improve our operational efficiency. The following table summarizes these charges which are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 | |||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||
Real estate consolidation |
$ | 5.4 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 5.4 | $ | 4.4 | ||||
Reductions in force |
2.6 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 1.6 | ||||||||
Technology migration |
9.9 | 3.6 | 21.8 | 7.4 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 17.9 | $ | 5.9 | $ | 31.5 | $ | 13.4 | ||||
Real Estate Consolidation
During 2004, our management re-evaluated all of our owned and leased real estate and determined that we would consolidate staff into fewer locations and save significant costs. As part of our real estate consolidation plans, in the second quarter of 2006, we decided to sell our building and related assets located in Trumbull, Connecticut. As a result of this decision, the carrying value of the building and related assets was adjusted to its fair market value less costs to sell amounting to $30.8 million, which was determined based on a quoted market price from an independent third party. The resulting $5.4 million charge recorded in April 2006 was included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. On July 28, 2006, we completed the sale of this building and related assets for approximately $30.4 million. See Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further discussion.
In 2005, we changed the estimated useful life of certain data center and other assets and recorded charges for accelerated depreciation of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. We included these charges in depreciation and amortization expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
8
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Reductions in Force
We eliminated 42 positions in the second quarter of 2006 and 23 positions in the second quarter of 2005 and recorded charges of $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2006 and $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2005 for severance and outplacement costs. We eliminated 64 positions in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 29 positions in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and recorded charges of $4.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and $1.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 for similar costs. These charges were included in compensation and benefits expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We paid approximately $1.6 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and $0.2 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 for these severance and outplacement costs. We expect to pay the remainder of the severance and outplacement costs by the end of the third quarter of 2007. Total headcount increased from 768 employees at June 30, 2005 to 887 employees at June 30, 2006 as a result of employees acquired in the Shareholder.com acquisition in 2006 and the INET and Carpenter Moore acquisitions in 2005, partially offset by staff reductions.
Technology Migration
As a result of a continued review of our technology infrastructure, we shortened the estimated useful life of certain assets and changed the lease terms on certain operating leases associated with our quoting platform and our trading and quoting network as we continue to migrate our technology operations to fewer, scalable, less expensive platforms, which resulted in incremental depreciation and amortization expense. The INET integration has accelerated our migration to a low-cost trading platform. As a result, the charges associated with these assets were $9.9 million for the second quarter of 2006 and $21.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. Of these amounts, $9.4 million for the second quarter of 2006 and $21.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 were included in depreciation and amortization expense and for both periods $0.5 million was included in computer operations and data communications expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The charges associated with these assets were $3.6 million for the second quarter of 2005 and $7.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and were included in depreciation and amortization expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Strategic Review
During the second quarter of 2003, we announced the results of a strategic review of our operations designed to position us for improved profitability and growth. This strategic review included the elimination of non-core product lines and initiatives and resulted in a reduction in our workforce.
The liability for strategic review costs was $5.8 million at December 31, 2005. In the first quarter of 2006, we funded the majority of the remaining reserves, except a contractual sublease obligation that will continue through 2010. At June 30, 2006, the liability was approximately $1.0 million and is included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
9
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
6. Investments
The following tables summarize investments classified as available-for-sale that are carried at fair market value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
June 30, 2006 |
Cost |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Estimated Fair Market Value | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Investment in the LSE |
$ | 1,171,066 | $ | 30,947 | (1) | $ | 1,140,119 | |||
U.S. treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies |
17,700 | 233 | 17,467 | |||||||
Corporate bonds |
48,313 | 157 | 48,156 | |||||||
Auction rate and other securities |
9,783 | | 9,783 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 1,246,862 | $ | 31,337 | $ | 1,215,525 | ||||
(1) | Amount includes an unrealized loss of approximately $61.9 million which was partially offset by a foreign currency translation adjustment gain of approximately $31.0 million. |
December 31, 2005 |
Cost |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Estimated Fair Market Value | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
U.S. treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies |
$ | 50,400 | $ | 867 | $ | 49,533 | |||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
6,062 | 15 | 6,047 | ||||||
Auction rate securities |
123,856 | 67 | 123,789 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 180,318 | $ | 949 | $ | 179,369 | |||
Investment in the LSE
The following table summarizes the purchase of our 25.3% ownership stake in the LSE at June 30, 2006:
Date Purchased |
Number of Shares |
Purchase Price Per Share |
Total Consideration |
Percentage Ownership |
|||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||||||
April 18, 2006 |
38,100,000 | £ | 11.75 | £ | 447.7 | $ | 784.8 | 14.9 | % | ||||||
May 8, 2006 |
9,790,280 | £ | 12.18 | 119.2 | 220.7 | 18.7 | % | ||||||||
May 15, 2006 |
13,791,440 | £ | 12.48 | 172.1 | 321.4 | 24.1 | % | ||||||||
May 23, 2006 |
1,086,216 | £ | 12.38 | 13.5 | 25.4 | 24.6 | % | ||||||||
May 24, 2006 |
1,133,034 | £ | 12.33 | 14.0 | 26.3 | 25.1 | %(2) | ||||||||
Total |
63,900,970 | (1) | £ | 766.5 | $ | 1,378.6 | |||||||||
(1) | As a result of the LSEs capital return, we currently own 54,225,405 shares of the LSE. See below for further discussion. |
(2) | After taking into effect the LSEs recent share buyback in June 2006, our total percentage ownership is approximately 25.3%. |
On March 7, 2006, the LSE announced that shareholders of record on May 12, 2006 would receive a capital return of approximately GBP 510 million later in May 2006. On May 26, 2006, based on our share ownership, which includes the shares that settled through May 15, 2006, we received GBP 123.4 million, or $228.8 million, which was recorded as a reduction to the cost basis in our investment. As a result of the capital return, we
10
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
currently own 54,225,405 shares of the LSE. In addition, on May 26, 2006, we also received an ordinary dividend of approximately GBP 4.9 million, or $9.2 million, from the LSE which was recorded in dividend income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
To finance the above purchases, we entered into credit facilities and utilized cash on hand of approximately $287.6 million. See Note 8, Debt Obligations, for further discussion of the credit facilities. In connection with the financing, as of June 30, 2006, we incurred additional acquisition costs of approximately GBP 7.2 million, or $13.1 million, to acquire our stake in the LSE. These costs such as stamp duty reserve tax, brokerage, legal and advisory were recorded as an addition to the cost basis in our investment.
In accordance with FIN 35, Criteria for Applying the Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock an interpretation of APB Opinion 18, or FIN 35, and APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, or APB 18, an investment (direct or indirect) of 20%, such as ours in the LSE, generally leads to a presumption that an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over an investee, requiring the investment to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We concluded that we are not able to exercise significant influence over the operational and financial policies of the LSE pursuant to paragraph 4d of FIN 35 as the equity method of accounting for our investment in the LSE would require the LSE to routinely provide us with certain non-public information and information not available to its other shareholders, in order to convert LSEs results to GAAP and prepare a full purchase price allocation as required under APB 18. At this point, this information is not available to us. Therefore, we have concluded that we do not exert significant influence over the LSE and that the equity method of accounting is not required. Thus we will account for our investment in the LSE in accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, or SFAS 115, and include our LSE shares in available-for-sale investments, at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unrealized gains and losses, including foreign currency translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets until the sale or redemption of the shares.
7. Deferred Revenue
Our deferred revenue at June 30, 2006 is primarily related to Corporate Client Group fees and will be recognized in the following years:
Initial Listing Fees |
Listing of Additional Shares |
Annual and Other(1) |
Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Fiscal year ended: |
||||||||||||
2006 |
$ | 10,432 | $ | 18,009 | $ | 60,165 | $ | 88,606 | ||||
2007 |
18,250 | 31,633 | 196 | 50,079 | ||||||||
2008 |
15,559 | 21,381 | | 36,940 | ||||||||
2009 |
12,227 | 10,557 | | 22,784 | ||||||||
2010 and thereafter |
13,273 | 1,805 | | 15,078 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 69,741 | $ | 83,385 | $ | 60,361 | $ | 213,487 | ||||
(1) | Primarily includes Corporate Client Groups annual listing fees, as well as annual listing fees from mutual fund products from Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions and licensing revenues from Nasdaq Financial Products. |
11
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Our deferred revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is reflected in the following tables. The additions primarily reflect Corporate Client Group revenues from listing fees charged during the period while the amortization primarily reflects Corporate Client Group revenues from listing fees recognized during the period in accordance with GAAP.
Initial Listing Fees |
Listing of Additional Shares |
Annual and Other |
Total |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2006 |
$ | 69,678 | $ | 74,766 | $ | 1,168 | $ | 145,612 | ||||||||
Additions |
12,388 | 26,709 | 121,817 | 160,914 | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
(12,325 | ) | (18,090 | ) | (62,624 | ) | (93,039 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
$ | 69,741 | $ | 83,385 | $ | 60,361 | $ | 213,487 | ||||||||
Initial Listing Fees |
Listing of Additional Shares |
Annual and Other |
Total |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
$ | 74,300 | $ | 75,058 | $ | | $ | 149,358 | ||||||||
Additions |
10,568 | 25,390 | 115,311 | 151,269 | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
(15,259 | ) | (18,844 | ) | (57,029 | ) | (91,132 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
$ | 69,609 | $ | 81,604 | $ | 58,282 | $ | 209,495 | ||||||||
8. Debt Obligations
The following table presents the changes in our debt obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2006:
December 31, 2005 |
Additions |
Payments and Accretion |
June 30, 2006 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
$750 million senior term debt due December 8, 2011 (average interest rate of 6.14% at December 31, 2005) |
$ | 750,000 | $ | | $ | (750,000 | ) | $ | | |||||||
3.75% convertible notes due October 22, 2012 (net of premium and discount) |
442,428 | | 188 | 442,616 | ||||||||||||
$750.0 million senior term loan facility due April 18, 2012 (average interest rate of 6.97% at June 30, 2006) |
| 750,000 | (1,875 | ) | 748,125 | |||||||||||
$434.8 million term loan credit agreement due April 18, 2012 (average interest rate of 6.98% at June 30, 2006) |
| 1,100,000 | (666,328 | ) | 433,672 | |||||||||||
Total debt obligations |
1,192,428 | 1,850,000 | (1,418,015 | ) | 1,624,413 | |||||||||||
Less current portion |
(7,500 | ) | (4,348 | ) | | (11,848 | ) | |||||||||
Total long-term debt obligations |
$ | 1,184,928 | $ | 1,845,652 | $ | (1,418,015 | ) | $ | 1,612,565 | |||||||
The 3.75% convertible notes include the $205 million convertible notes issued at a discount to SLP and H&F and the restructured $240 million convertible notes issued at a premium to H&F. On an as-converted basis at June 30, 2006, H&F owned an approximate 18.1% equity interest in us as a result of its ownership of the $240 million convertible notes, $60.0 million of the $205 million convertible notes, 3,400,000 shares underlying
12
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
warrants and 500,000 shares of common stock purchased from us in a separate transaction. On an as-converted basis at June 30, 2006, SLP owned an approximate 10.5% equity interest in us as a result of its ownership of $145.0 million of the $205 million convertible notes, 1,562,500 shares underlying warrants and 1,430,250 shares of common stock owned by SLP affiliates.
On April 18, 2006, in order to finance the purchase of our stake in the LSE, we entered into new credit agreements, or the April 2006 Credit Facility. The April 2006 Credit Facility provided for credit of up to $1.925 billion of secured financing (see details below) and replaced our former credit agreement dated December 8, 2005 obtained in connection with the financing of the INET acquisition. In connection with the refinancing of our former credit agreement, we recorded a $12.3 million loss on the early extinguishment of this debt in April 2006, which we included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The $1.925 billion available under the April 2006 Credit Facility included:
(1) | a six-year $750.0 million senior term loan facility, |
(2) | a five-year un-drawn $75.0 million revolving credit facility, with a letter of credit subfacility and swingline loan subfacility and |
(3) | a six-year $1.1 billion secured term loan facility. |
On May 2, 2006, we completed a public offering of 18,500,000 shares of our common stock, for net proceeds of $665.2 million before deducting offering expenses. These proceeds were used to prepay a portion of the amount outstanding under the April 2006 Credit Facility. In connection with this prepayment we recorded a loss of $8.6 million on the early extinguishment of a portion of this debt in May 2006, which was included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
On May 19, 2006, the April 2006 Credit Facility was amended into two new credit facilities, or the Credit Facilities, and currently provides for credit up to $1.26 billion of secured financing. See Credit Facilities, below for further discussion.
At June 30, 2006 we were in compliance with the covenants of all of our debt agreements.
Credit Facilities
As discussed above, on May 19, 2006, the April 2006 Credit Facility was amended and the Credit Facilities currently provide for credit up to $1.26 billion of secured financing. The $1.26 billion available under the Credit Facilities includes:
(1) $825.0 million senior credit agreement, which includes:
| a six-year $750.0 million senior term loan facility, or $750.0 million senior term loan facility and |
| a five-year un-drawn $75.0 million revolving credit facility, with a letter of credit subfacility and swingline loan subfacility. |
(2) $434.8 million six-year secured term loan credit agreement, or $434.8 million term loan credit agreement.
Any amounts prepaid under the Credit Facilities, excluding the un-drawn $75.0 million revolving credit facility, constitute permanent reductions in availability.
13
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The interest rate on loans made under the Credit Facilities, excluding the un-drawn $75.0 million revolving credit facility, is expected to be either:
(1) a margin of 75 basis points (decreasing to a margin of 50 basis points on the earlier of either the outstanding amounts under the Credit Facilities is less than or equal to $750.0 million, or when the Credit Facilities receive a rating of Ba2 (stable outlook or better) or higher by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and a rating of BBB (stable outlook or better) or higher by Standards & Poors Ratings Group, Inc.) plus a rate per annum equal to the greater of:
(a) the rate announced from time to time by Bank of America, N.A. as its prime rate and
(b) the federal funds effective rate plus 1/2 of 1%, or
(2) a margin of 175 basis points (decreasing to a margin of 150 basis points on the earlier of either the outstanding amounts under the Credit Facilities is less than or equal to $750.0 million, or when the Credit Facilities receive a rating of Ba2 (stable outlook or better) or higher by Moodys and a rating of BBB (stable outlook or better) or higher by Standards & Poors) plus the LIBO Rate set by the British Bankers Association at 11:00 a.m. two days prior, in each case.
Nasdaq has also agreed to pay customary fees and expenses related to the Credit Facilities and to provide customary indemnities.
Our obligations under the Credit Facilities are secured by a security interest in and liens upon substantially all of our assets and subsidiaries. All of our domestic subsidiaries are guarantors of our obligations under the Credit Facilities, excluding the regulated broker-dealer subsidiaries, the insurance-related subsidiaries and The Trade Reporting Facility LLC, or TRF, a joint venture with National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or NASD, which we formed in April 2006 as part of our exchange registration. See Exchange Registration, of Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further discussion.
The Credit Facilities contain customary negative covenants which will affect our subsidiaries and us, including the following:
| limitations on the payment of dividends and redemptions of our capital stock; |
| limitations on loans, guarantees, investments, incurrence of debt and hedging arrangements; |
| limitations on issuance and amendment of preferred stock and amendment of subordinated debt agreements; |
| prohibition of prepayments, redemptions and repurchases of debt other than debt under the Credit Facilities; |
| limitations on liens and sale-leaseback transactions; |
| limitations on mergers, recapitalizations, acquisitions and asset sales; |
| limitations on transactions with affiliates; |
| limitations on restrictions on liens and other restrictive agreements; and |
| limitations on changes in our business. |
14
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
In addition, the Credit Facilities contain financial covenants, specifically, a maintenance of minimum interest expense coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facilities and pursuant to the following schedules:
Interest Expense Coverage Ratio
Period |
Ratio | |
April 18, 2006 to September 30, 2006 |
2.00 to 1.00 | |
October 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007 |
2.25 to 1.00 | |
April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 |
2.50 to 1.00 | |
April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 |
3.00 to 1.00 | |
April 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 |
3.50 to 1.00 | |
Thereafter |
4.00 to 1.00 |
Leverage Ratio
Period |
Ratio | |
April 18, 2006 to June 30, 2006 |
5.75 to 1.00 | |
July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 |
5.50 to 1.00 | |
October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 |
5.00 to 1.00 | |
January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2007 |
4.25 to 1.00 | |
April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007 |
4.00 to 1.00 | |
July 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007 |
3.75 to 1.00 | |
October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 |
3.50 to 1.00 | |
January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008 |
3.25 to 1.00 | |
April 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 |
3.00 to 1.00 | |
January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009 |
2.75 to 1.00 | |
Thereafter |
2.50 to 1.00 |
The $434.8 million term loan credit agreement is excluded from the calculation of the Leverage Ratio until October 2007. The Credit Facilities also contain customary affirmative covenants, including interest rate protection, access to financial statements, notice of trigger events and defaults, maintenance of business and insurance, and events of default, as well as cross-defaults on material indebtedness.
We are permitted to prepay borrowings under the Credit Facilities at any time in whole or in part, subject to our remaining in compliance with the covenants discussed above and our obligation to pay additional fees in certain circumstances. We are required to make mandatory prepayments upon the receipt of net proceeds in the case of a sale, transfer or other disposition of an asset or other events as defined in the Credit Facilities. Beginning in 2007, we also are required to use a percentage of our prior years excess cash flow to prepay loans outstanding under the Credit Facilities. The percentage of cash flow we are required to use for prepayments varies depending on our leverage ratio at the end of the year for which cash flow is calculated, with the maximum prepayment percentage set at 50.0%.
On July 28, 2006, we completed the sale of a building and related assets located in Trumbull, Connecticut. As a result of this sale we were required to prepay a portion of the Credit Facilities as defined in the agreements. We plan to use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes. See Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further discussion.
15
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
9. Employee Benefits
At December 31, 2005, we were a participating employer in a non-contributory, defined-benefit pension plan that NASD sponsors for the benefit of its eligible employees and the eligible employees of its subsidiaries. As part of our separation from NASD, effective January 1, 2006, we adopted our own non-contributory, defined-benefit pension plan and transferred our participants in NASDs pension plan to our plan. The adoption of our own plan did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We also have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP, for eligible senior executives. The SERP is an unfunded plan.
The following table presents the combined pension and SERP amounts recognized in compensation and benefits expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 1,673 | $ | 3,146 | $ | 3,346 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
969 | 1,040 | 1,910 | 2,080 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(719 | ) | (746 | ) | (1,438 | ) | (1,491 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
311 | 322 | 623 | 644 | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost recognized |
(135 | ) | (67 | ) | (270 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized transition asset |
(14 | ) | (14 | ) | (28 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||
Settlement loss recognized |
267 | | 348 | | ||||||||||||
Benefit cost |
$ | 2,216 | $ | 2,208 | $ | 4,291 | $ | 4,416 | ||||||||
10. Share-Based Compensation
We have a share-based compensation program that provides our Board of Directors broad discretion in creating employee equity incentives. Stock option grants are designed to reward employees for their long-term contributions to Nasdaq and provide incentives for them to remain with us. Our share-based compensation program includes stock options and restricted stock awards granted under various plans. Stock options are generally time-based. Stock option awards granted prior to January 1, 2005 generally vest 33% on each annual anniversary of the grant date over three years and expire ten years from the grant date. Stock option awards granted after January 1, 2005 generally vest 25% on each anniversary of the grant date over four years and also expire ten years from the grant date. In addition, in 2004 we granted Performance Accelerated Stock Options, or PASOs, for officers and a select group of non-officer employees. These PASOs included a performance based accelerated vesting feature based on Nasdaq achieving specific levels of performance. Since Nasdaq achieved the specific levels of performance for accelerated vesting, 50.0% of the PASO awards will vest on January 15, 2008 and the remaining 50.0% will vest on January 15, 2009. Restricted stock awards are generally time-based and vest over two to five-year periods beginning on the date of the grant. Additionally, we have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, that allows eligible employees to purchase a limited number of shares of Nasdaq common stock at six-month intervals, called offering periods, at 85.0% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period. The 15.0% discount given to our employees is included in compensation and benefits expense beginning January 1, 2006 with the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises, restricted stock and our ESPP are generally first issued out of common stock in treasury. As of June 30, 2006, we had approximately 7.8 million shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our stock option and restricted stock award plans and ESPP.
16
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The following table shows the total share-based compensation expense resulting from stock options, restricted stock awards and the 15.0% discount for the ESPP for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and restricted stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense before income taxes |
$ | 2,688 | $ | 462 | $ | 5,444 | $ | 780 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
(1,054 | ) | (181 | ) | (2,135 | ) | (306 | ) | ||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense after income taxes |
$ | 1,634 | $ | 281 | $ | 3,309 | $ | 474 | ||||||||
Had we not recognized additional share-based compensation expense for stock options and the 15.0% discount for the ESPP, our basic and diluted earnings per share would have increased by $0.01 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $0.02 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Under both SFAS 123(R) and APB 25, our previous accounting standard, we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock awards which is not included in the above earnings per share amounts.
We received net cash proceeds from the exercise of approximately 0.2 million stock options of $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, and from the exercise of approximately 1.8 million stock options, we received $22.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. We received net cash proceeds from the exercise of approximately 1.2 million stock options of $15.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, and from the exercise of approximately 1.3 million stock options, we received $16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we present excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, if any, as financing cash flows.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we applied SFAS 123, amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Share-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, or SFAS 148, which allowed companies to apply the existing accounting rules under APB 25 and related interpretations. In general, as the exercise price of options granted under these plans was equal to the market price of the underlying common stock on the grant date, we did not recognize share-based employee compensation cost in our net income for periods prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), we recorded $19.0 million of income tax benefits related to tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized from the exercise of stock options as cash provided by financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the six months ended June 30, 2006. In the six months ended June 30, 2005, a $2.8 million benefit arose from the tax deductions related to the exercise of stock options. On January 1, 2006, as required by SFAS 123(R), we recorded the deferred stock compensation and common stock issuable balances to additional paid-in capital.
17
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
As required by SFAS 148, prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we provided pro forma net income and pro forma net income per common share disclosures for share-based awards, as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS 123 had been applied. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to share-based compensation:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|||||||
(in thousands, except per share amount) | ||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 13,971 | $ | 26,742 | ||||
Share-based compensation cost determined under fair value based method for stock options (net of tax of $685 and $1,335, respectively) |
(1,061 | ) | (2,068 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 12,910 | $ | 24,674 | ||||
Pro forma basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.26 | ||||
Pro forma diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.24 | ||||
We estimated the fair value of share-based awards using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Expected life (in years) |
5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average risk free interest rate |
4.85 | % | 3.86 | % | 4.58 | % | 3.77 | % | ||||||||
Expected volatility |
35.0 | % | 30.0 | % | 32.5 | % | 30.0 | % | ||||||||
Dividend yield |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average fair value at grant date |
$ | 13.71 | $ | 5.04 | $ | 13.27 | $ | 3.68 |
Our computation of expected volatility for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 is based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 is based on historical volatility. Our computation of expected life is based on historical exercise patterns. The interest rate for periods within the expected life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Our Credit Facilities prohibit us from paying dividends. Before our Credit Facilities had been in place, it was not our policy to declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006, is as follows:
Stock Options |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
12,112,103 | $ | 9.23 | 7.2 | $ | 250,295 | ||||||
Grants |
416,050 | 37.84 | | (3,302 | ) | |||||||
Exercises |
(1,817,386 | ) | 12.24 | | (32,102 | ) | ||||||
Forfeitures or expirations |
(144,289 | ) | 13.85 | | (2,316 | ) | ||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
10,566,478 | $ | 9.78 | 7.3 | $ | 212,575 | ||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
4,241,396 | $ | 8.80 | 6.2 | $ | 89,504 |
18
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (i.e., the difference between Nasdaqs closing stock price on June 30, 2006 of $29.90 and the exercise price, times the number of shares) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their stock options on June 30, 2006. This amount changes based on the fair market value of Nasdaqs common stock. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $32.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Total fair value of stock options vested was $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2006, $8.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
The following table summarizes our restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
Restricted Stock Awards |
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||
Unvested awards at January 1, 2006 |
$ | 453,406 | $ | 15.02 | |||
Granted |
58,656 | 35.04 | |||||
Vested |
(161,052 | ) | 9.59 | ||||
Unvested awards at June 30, 2006 |
$ | 351,010 | $ | 20.85 | |||
At June 30, 2006, $4.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
Under our ESPP employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 10.0% of their annual compensation, subject to applicable annual Internal Revenue Service limitations. As of June 30, 2006 employees purchased 48,799 shares at a price of $24.02 and as of June 30, 2005, purchased 68,532 shares at a price of $8.67. The next purchase will be at the end of December 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $0.2 million of compensation expense for the 15.0% discount that is given to our employees. There was no expense recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2005 for the discount under APB 25.
11. Related Party Transactions
First Quarter 2006 Public Equity Offering
In the first quarter of 2006, we completed a public offering of 15,979,513 shares of our common stock, of which we sold 8,042,142 shares issued from common stock in treasury and NASD and other selling stockholders sold 7,937,371 shares. Other selling stockholders initially received their shares through the exercise of warrants they purchased in our 2000 and 2001 private placements.
Preferred Stock
On February 15, 2006 we redeemed our Series C Cumulative preferred stock, held by NASD, for $104.7 million including accrued and unpaid dividends and a make-whole premium. We used a portion of the net proceeds obtained from the first quarter 2006 public equity offering to fund the redemption.
NASD Equity Ownership
As a result of the first quarter 2006 public equity offering and the May 2006 offering, NASDs equity ownership in Nasdaq decreased from 18.4% at December 31, 2005 to 0.2% at June 30, 2006. In July 2006,
19
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
NASD announced it had achieved full divestiture of ownership of Nasdaq common stock. See Note 16, Subsequent Events, for further discussion.
Registration of NASD Warrant Shares
In May 2006, we began registering for resale up to 14,201,625 shares of common stock issued or issuable upon the exercise of warrants that were sold to investors by NASD in our 2000 and 2001 private placements. We have filed a registration statement and a series of prospectus supplements to register a portion of these shares and plan to continue to file additional prospectus supplements until the remaining shares are registered for resale. We have agreed to make the resale registration statement and related prospectus supplements available to selling stockholders until June 27, 2007, subject to blackout periods and other conditions.
Repurchase of Warrant Shares
In connection with our acquisition of INET, we acquired warrants that were originally purchased by INET from NASD in our 2000 and 2001 private placements. In June 2006, we exercised these warrants. We paid NASD approximately $0.7 million for these warrant shares, which were immediately retired to common stock in treasury. We acquired these warrants in connection with the acquisition of INET. See Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, for further discussion.
Other Related Party Transactions
NASD Regulation, Inc., or NASDR, provides us with regulatory services, including the regulation of trading activity on The Nasdaq Stock Market and surveillance and investigative functions for us. In October 2005, we transferred responsibility for the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, or OTCBB, an electronic screen-based quotation service for securities that, among other things, are not listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or any U.S. national securities exchange, back to NASD, but agreed to continue to operate the OTCBB on a contract basis for two years, subject to renewals. We provide NASD technology development support services for a fixed income trade reporting platform. We also pay NASD for the use of office space.
We also have formed a joint venture with NASD to operate a trade reporting facility, which will allow us to continue to collect reports of trades executed by broker-dealers outside of our exchange and recognize revenue for the related fees. To this end, we recently formed a limited liability company called The Trade Reporting Facility LLC, of which Nasdaq and NASD are members. Nasdaq provides technology and managerial services for the TRF, and NASD regulates the TRF as one of its facilities. The TRF began operating on August 1, 2006 for Nasdaq-listed securities, and will begin operating for other exchange-listed securities after the SEC approves an NASD filing to establish applicable rules.
20
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
12. Earnings Per Common Share
The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
|||||||||||||||
Net income applicable to common stockholders: |
|||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,644 | $ | 13,971 | $ | 34,632 | $ | 26,742 | |||||||
Preferred stock: |
|||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
| (785 | ) | (359 | ) | (1,790 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion of preferred stock |
| (1,459 | ) | (331 | ) | (2,387 | ) | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders for basic earnings per share |
16,644 | 11,727 | 33,942 | 22,565 | |||||||||||
Interest impact of convertible notes, net of taxes |
2,535 | 2,296 | 5,071 | 3,755 | |||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders for diluted earnings per share |
$ | 19,179 | $ | 14,023 | $ | 39,013 | $ | 26,320 | |||||||
Denominator: |
|||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares for basic earnings per share |
105,197,081 | 79,401,323 | 96,584,440 | 79,206,010 | |||||||||||
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Employee stock options and awards |
6,407,264 | 3,924,770 | 6,684,009 | 2,591,194 | |||||||||||
Convertible notes assumed converted into common stock |
30,689,655 | 26,376,658 | 30,689,655 | 19,228,043 | |||||||||||
Warrants |
2,902,951 | 211,601 | 3,091,727 | | |||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
145,196,951 | 109,914,352 | 137,049,831 | 101,025,247 | |||||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.28 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.26 | |||||||
Options to purchase 10,566,478 shares of common stock, 351,010 shares of restricted stock, convertible notes convertible into 30,689,655 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 4,962,500 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2006. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we included 9,975,413 of the options outstanding, 346,010 shares of restricted stock, all of the shares underlying the convertible notes and all of the shares underlying the warrants in the computation of diluted earnings per share, on a weighted average basis, as their inclusion was dilutive. The remaining options and shares of restricted stock were considered antidilutive and were excluded. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we included 9,999,513 of the options outstanding, all of the shares of restricted stock, all of the shares underlying the convertible notes and all of the shares underlying the warrants in the computation of diluted earnings per share, on a weighted average basis, as their inclusion was dilutive. The remaining options were considered antidilutive and were properly excluded.
21
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Options to purchase 15,099,682 shares of common stock, 445,559 shares of restricted stock, convertible notes convertible into 30,689,665 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 5,082,412 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2005. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, we included 14,983,582 of the options outstanding, all of the shares of restricted stock, 26,376,658 of the shares underlying the convertible notes and all of the shares underlying the warrants in the computation of diluted earnings, on a weighted average basis, as their inclusion was dilutive. The remaining options and shares underlying the convertible notes were considered antidilutive and were properly excluded. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we included 9,872,761 of the options outstanding, 319,803 shares of restricted stock and 19,228,043 of the shares underlying convertible notes in the computation of diluted earnings per share, on a weighted average basis, as their inclusion was dilutive. The remaining options, shares of restricted stock and shares underlying the convertible notes and all of the shares underlying the warrants were considered antidilutive and were properly excluded.
13. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is composed of net income and other comprehensive income, which includes the change in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, foreign currency translation adjustments and a minimum pension liability adjustment.
The following table outlines the changes in other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,644 | $ | 13,971 | $ | 34,632 | $ | 26,742 | ||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
(30,664 | )(1) | 1,008 | (30,610 | )(1) | 428 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
23 | (126 | ) | 12 | (115 | ) | ||||||||||
Total change in comprehensive income |
$ | (13,997 | ) | $ | 14,853 | $ | 4,034 | $ | 27,055 | |||||||
(1) | Amount includes an unrealized loss of approximately $61.9 million which was partially offset by a foreign currency translation adjustment gain of approximately $31.0 million related to our investment in the LSE. See Note 6, Investments, for further discussion. Tax benefits associated with the unrealized capital losses related to our investment in the LSE have been offset by a valuation allowance, as it is more-likely-than-not that they will not be realized. |
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Brut Agreements
Brut contracted with a subsidiary of SunGard, SunGard Financial Systems Inc., for SunGard Financial to provide Brut on-line processing, report services and related services in connection with Bruts clearance of trades. The term of this agreement is five years and began in September 2004 and is automatically renewed at yearly intervals thereafter until terminated by Brut or SunGard Financial. The annual service fee was $10.0 million in the first year, declining to $8.0 million in the second year and $6.0 million in the third year of the agreement. The annual service fee is subject to price review in years four and five based on market rates, but will not be less than $4.0 million per year. Some additional fees may be assessed based on services needed or requested.
22
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Brut also contracted with SunGard to host certain software on designated equipment at a SunGard facility for a transitional period beginning in September 2004. SunGard developed and operated the computer software programs that enables Brut to operate and provide order entry and execution over its ECN. Under the terms of the amended agreement, which was effective August 1, 2005, the monthly payment was reduced to a nominal amount for the remainder of the term of the agreement ($0.7 million in 2006) which now expires in December 2006. Brut may cancel the agreement at any time upon providing SunGard sixty days written notice.
Brokerage Activities
In accordance with FASB Interpretation 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, Brut provides guarantees to securities clearinghouses and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require members to guarantee the performance of other members. If a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearinghouses, other members would be required to meet its shortfalls. To mitigate these performance risks, the exchanges and clearinghouses often require members to post collateral as well as meet certain minimum financial standards. Bruts maximum potential liability under these arrangements cannot be quantified. However, we believe that the potential for Brut to be required to make payments under these arrangements is unlikely. Accordingly, no contingent liability is recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for these arrangements.
In August 2006, we settled a regulatory matter with NASD regarding compliance with Bruts obligations regarding short sales, firm quotes and other reporting and disclosure requirements. In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded a $2.2 million charge for the amount of the fine or penalty associated with these matters.
Leases
We lease some of our office space and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases with third parties and also sublease office space from NASD and sublease office space to third parties. Some of our leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses based on increases in property taxes and building operating costs.
Escrow Agreements
In connection with the acquisitions of Shareholder.com in 2006 and Carpenter Moore in 2005, we entered into escrow agreements for the designation of funds to secure the payment of post-closing adjustments and other closing conditions. The escrow agreements provide for payments of $1.5 million in 2006, $10.4 million in 2007 and $1.5 million in 2008.
Litigation
We may be subject to claims arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, there are legal proceedings pending against us, which are disclosed in Item 3. Legal Proceedings in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We believe that any liabilities or settlements arising from currently pending proceedings will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Our management is not aware of any unasserted claims or assessments that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
15. Segments
We manage, operate and provide our products and services in two business segments, our Market Services segment and our Issuer Services segment. The Market Services segment includes our transaction-based business
23
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
(Nasdaq Market Center) and our market information services business (Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions), which are interrelated because the transaction-based business generates the quote and trade information that we sell to market participants and data vendors. The Issuer Services segment includes our securities listings business, our insurance business and shareholder services (Corporate Client Group) and our financial products business (Nasdaq Financial Products). The companies listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market represent a diverse array of industries. This diversity of Nasdaq-listed companies allows us to develop industry-specific and other Nasdaq indexes that we use to develop and license financial products and associated derivatives. Because of these interrelationships, our management allocates resources, assesses performance and manages these businesses as two separate segments.
We evaluate the performance of our segments based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is income before income taxes. Results of individual businesses are presented based on our management accounting practices and our management structure. Certain charges are allocated to Corporate items in our management reports based on the decision that those activities should not be used to evaluate the segments operating performance.
The following table presents information regarding these operating segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Market Services |
Issuer Services |
Corporate Items and Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 347,587 | $ | 63,380 | $ | 65 | $ | 411,032 | |||||||
Cost of revenues |
(239,881 | ) | | | (239,881 | ) | |||||||||
Gross margin |
107,706 | 63,380 | 65 | 171,151 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 17,258 | $ | 10,375 | $ | 106 | $ | 27,739 | |||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 163,626 | $ | 56,060 | $ | | $ | 219,686 | |||||||
Cost of revenues |
(89,225 | ) | | | (89,225 | ) | |||||||||
Gross margin |
74,401 | 56,060 | | 130,461 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 7,051 | $ | 22,283 | $ | (4,548 | ) | $ | 24,786 | ||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 684,888 | $ | 122,258 | $ | 332 | $ | 807,478 | |||||||
Cost of revenues |
(474,310 | ) | | | (474,310 | ) | |||||||||
Gross margin |
210,578 | 122,258 | 332 | 333,168 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 36,940 | $ | 20,635 | $ | 144 | $ | 57,719 | |||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 288,741 | $ | 110,965 | $ | 173 | $ | 399,879 | |||||||
Cost of revenues |
(143,140 | ) | | | (143,140 | ) | |||||||||
Gross margin |
145,601 | 110,965 | 173 | 256,739 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | 9,331 | $ | 43,559 | $ | (6,783 | ) | $ | 46,107 | ||||||
24
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Total assets increased $1.4 billion or 66.9% at June 30, 2006 as compared with December 31, 2005. This increase is primarily due to the purchase of our stake in the LSE. See Note 6, Investments, for further discussion.
16. Subsequent Events
Sale of Building and Related Assets
In April 2006, we classified our building and related assets located in Trumbull, Connecticut as held-for-sale. See Note 5, 2006 and 2005 Cost Reduction Program, INET Integration and Strategic Review, for further discussion. On July 28, 2006, we completed the sale of this building and related assets for approximately $30.4 million which resulted in an additional $0.4 million loss recorded in the third quarter of 2006. As a result of this sale we were required to prepay a portion of the Credit Facilities as defined in the agreements. Accordingly, we prepaid approximately $9.7 million of the $750 million senior term loan facility and approximately $5.7 million of the $434.8 million term loan credit agreement. We plan to use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes.
NASD Equity Ownership in Nasdaq Common Stock
On July 11, 2006, NASD announced it had achieved full divestiture of ownership of Nasdaq common stock, with the sale of its remaining shares of Nasdaq common stock. NASD still has voting control based on its ownership of our Series D preferred stock. After we complete the second phase of exchange registration, which we expect to occur in the fourth quarter of 2006, the Series D preferred stock will automatically lose its voting rights and will be redeemed by us for $1.00.
Exchange Registration
On August 1, 2006, we completed a corporate restructuring in connection with becoming operational as a national securities exchange. Under the new structure, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. was converted to a holding company and, its wholly-owned subsidiary, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, assumed the operations of the national securities exchange.
25
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We are a leading provider of securities listing, trading, and information products and services. Our revenue sources are diverse and include revenues from transaction services, market data products and services, listing fees and client services, and financial products. The Nasdaq Stock Market is the largest electronic equity securities market in the United States, both in terms of number of listed companies and traded share volume. As of June 30, 2006, we were home to 3,205 listed companies. We also operate The Nasdaq Market Center, which provides our market participants with the ability to access, process, display and integrate orders and quotes in The Nasdaq Stock Market and other national stock exchanges. Transactions involving 291.6 billion equity securities were executed on or reported to our systems in the first six months of 2006.
On August 1, 2006, we completed a corporate restructuring in connection with becoming operational as a national securities exchange. Under the new structure, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. was converted to a holding company and, its wholly-owned subsidiary, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, assumed the operations of the national securities exchange.
Second Quarter 2006 Highlights
Second quarter net income increased to $16.6 million or $0.13 per diluted share from net income of $14.0 million or $0.13 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2005. Our recent acquisitions contributed to our earnings and we expect further contributions from them in our future results. Gross margin (revenues less cost of revenues) increased by 31.2% in the second quarter of 2006, from $130.4 million. During the quarter, we continued with our cost reduction program and the integration of INET. Our results were also impacted by our investment in the LSE.
During the second quarter, we:
| acquired a stake in the LSE totaling approximately 25.3% of the issued share capital of the LSE, after taking into effect LSEs recent share buyback. |
| completed an offering of 18,500,000 shares of common stock at $37.36 per share. The net proceeds were used to prepay a portion of the amount outstanding under our April 2006 Credit Facility. |
| received approval from the SEC of our phased approach to exchange operation. We became operational as an exchange in Nasdaq-listed securities on August 1, 2006, and plan to become operational in other exchange-listed securities in the fourth quarter of 2006. |
| entered into a definitive agreement to acquire PrimeZone Media Network, Inc., a privately held press release newswire and multimedia service firm, enhancing Nasdaqs investor relations and corporate communications suite. We expect to complete this acquisition in the third quarter of 2006. |
| improved our matched market share in New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE-listed stocks, to 8.3%, up from 7.0% in the first quarter of 2006. Matched market share for American Stock Exchange, or Amex-listed stocks, increased to 24.8% in the second quarter of 2006, up from 22.3% in the prior quarter. |
Key Drivers
The following table includes data showing average daily share volume in Nasdaq-listed securities and the percentage of share volume of Nasdaq-, NYSE- and Amex-listed securities reported to The Nasdaq Market Center. In addition, the table shows drivers for our Issuer Services segment, including initial public offerings and number of listed companies. In evaluating the performance of our business, our senior management closely watches these key drivers.
26
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||
Average daily share volume in Nasdaq-listed securities (in billions) |
2.14 | 1.78 | 2.13 | 1.89 | ||||||||
Percentage of share volume of Nasdaq-listed securities reported to The Nasdaq Market Center |
77.8 | % | 55.7 | % | 78.9 | % | 55.3 | % | ||||
Percentage of share volume of NYSE-listed securities reported to The Nasdaq Market Center |
22.7 | % | 15.6 | % | 22.4 | % | 15.3 | % | ||||
Percentage of share volume of Amex-listed securities reported to The Nasdaq Market Center |
46.1 | % | 32.4 | % | 45.1 | % | 31.9 | % | ||||
Initial public offerings |
35 | 25 | 65 | 45 | ||||||||
Secondary offerings |
54 | 50 | 123 | 95 | ||||||||
New listings(1) |
81 | 66 | 141 | 118 | ||||||||
Number of listed companies(2) |
3,205 | 3,241 | 3,205 | 3,241 |
(1) | New listings reflect initial public offerings, including those completed on a best efforts basis, and issuers that switched from other listing venues. |
(2) | Number of listed companies as of period end. |
Operating Results
The following table shows a summary of our operating results:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Market Services |
$ | 347.6 | $ | 163.6 | # | $ | 684.9 | $ | 288.7 | # | ||||||||||||
Issuer Services |
63.4 | 56.1 | 13.0 | % | 122.3 | 110.9 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | 0.2 | 0.2 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
411.0 | 219.7 | 87.1 | % | 807.4 | 399.8 | # | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
(239.9 | ) | (89.3 | ) | # | (474.3 | ) | (143.1 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
171.1 | 130.4 | 31.2 | % | 333.1 | 256.7 | 29.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total expenses |
134.8 | 104.1 | 29.5 | % | 255.0 | 207.6 | 22.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16.6 | $ | 14.0 | 18.6 | % | $ | 34.6 | $ | 26.7 | 29.6 | % | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.15 | 6.7 | % | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.28 | 25.0 | % | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 | | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.26 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
Our second quarter and first six months of 2006 results were primarily driven by increases in the gross margin of our Market Services segment, where we gained market share and trading volume, primarily due to the INET acquisition. Second quarter and first six months of 2006 results include INET operations, following the acquisition on December 8, 2005. Market share increases were in Nasdaq-, NYSE- and Amex-listed securities and average daily share volume also increased. An increase in sales of proprietary data products also contributed to the increase in gross margin from Market Services. Issuer Services revenues were positively impacted by our recent acquisitions of Carpenter Moore and Shareholder.com. Partially offsetting these increases was an increase in expenses related to the integration of INET and our cost reduction program and recent acquisitions. These current and prior year items are discussed in more detail below.
27
Integration of INET
Our integration of INET is well underway. On July 14, 2006, the SEC approved our plan to integrate The Nasdaq Market Center and the Brut and INET execution systems into a single platform. Our system integration, which is based on the INET platform, will provide improved execution quality and speed, while maintaining the attributes of The Nasdaq Market Center, including market making functionality, attributed quotes, and the Opening, Closing and IPO crosses. Our system integration in Nasdaq-listed securities will occur on a security-by-security phase-in scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2006. NYSE-, Amex- and regional-listed securities will be integrated on a single date in the fourth quarter of 2006. We expect to complete the integration during the fourth quarter of 2006.
Exchange Registration
In January 2006, the SEC approved our application for registration as a national securities exchange. We began operating as an exchange in Nasdaq-listed securities on August 1, 2006, and expect to begin operating in other exchange-listed securities in the fourth quarter of 2006. Before we can operate as an exchange for other exchange-listed securities, the NASD must establish a facility for quotation and trade reporting of these securities. We expect to act as a service provider to NASD to allow it to satisfy this condition in the near term, though there may be delays in NASD completing required actions and SEC approval. Exchange registration has already provided benefits to our proprietary data business and our corporate governance structure.
To facilitate our operations as an exchange, we have formed the TRF, a joint venture with NASD to operate a trade reporting facility, which will allow us to continue to collect reports of trades executed by broker-dealers outside of our exchange and recognize revenue for the related fees. Nasdaq provides technology and managerial services for the TRF, and NASD regulates the TRF as one of its facilities. The TRF began operating on August 1, 2006 for Nasdaq-listed securities, and will begin operating for other exchange-listed securities after the SEC approves an NASD filing to establish applicable rules. Nasdaq does not expect the TRF to have a material effect on our financial results.
Cost Reductions and Operating Efficiencies
During the past several years, we have taken significant steps to grow our business and enhance our competitive position. We have successfully reduced technology costs, eliminated non-core products, scaled back our workforce and consolidated our real estate facilities and operations. We continue to migrate our technology operations to fewer, scalable, less expensive non-proprietary platforms. The INET integration has accelerated our migration to a low-cost trading platform and will result in significant operating synergies.
As a result of our cost reduction steps, in the second quarter of 2006 we incurred incremental pre-tax expenses of approximately $17.9 million, and incurred $31.5 million in the first six months of 2006 in connection with taking actions to improve our operational efficiency, including the integration of INET. We incurred similar charges of approximately $5.9 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $13.4 million in the first six months of 2005. We expect to incur additional charges in the remaining periods of 2006 related to the integration of INET, consolidation of real estate and reductions in our workforce. See Note 5, 2006 and 2005 Cost Reduction Program, INET Integration and Strategic Review, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Business Environment
In spite of a challenging business environment and increasing uncertainty about the overall economy, our key drivers showed a solid performance for the current quarter. Our business environment continues to be marked by intense competition in our trade execution, trade reporting and listings business. Specific challenges we face include aggressive pricing in an attempt to increase trading volume market share and an increased
28
emphasis on electronic trading due to technological advancements and regulatory changes. As our industry further consolidates internationally, global factors and competitors are becoming increasingly important to our performance. Our business has been and will continue to be impacted by domestic and international trends in the following key external factors:
| the number of companies seeking equity financing, which is affected by factors such as investor demand, the economy, alternative sources of financing, and tax and regulatory policies; |
| trading volumes, particularly in U.S. equity securities, which are driven primarily by overall macroeconomic conditions; |
| competition (in terms of listings, market share, pricing, and product and service offerings); and |
| technological advancements and regulatory developments. |
These factors will affect our future revenues, gross margin and net income.
The optimism about future economic conditions that characterized the end of the first quarter faded during the second quarter as investor reaction to positive news concerning economic growth was tempered by continuing new highs in commodity prices and indications from the Federal Reserve that further monetary tightening could not be ruled out. U.S. equity price indices exhibited a mixed performance during the quarter with the Nasdaq Composite underperforming other leading indices. Global price indices and equity trading volumes on international equity markets also exhibited mixed results. The value of the S&P Global 1200, a composite index comprised of major regional and country indexes, was 15.2% higher on June 30, 2006 compared with its value on June 30, 2005 and was 0.9% lower on June 30, 2006 compared with March 31, 2006. The aggregate dollar value of equity trading by the worlds leading equity markets also increased 54.5% during the second quarter of 2006 compared with the second quarter of 2005 and increased 6.4% during the second quarter of 2006 relative to the first quarter of 2006. While facing the possibility of a slow down in the pace of economic expansion, our short term performance drivers remained strong in the quarter. Rising domestic equity prices and volumes positively impacted the issuance of equity capital and the number of initial public offerings on Nasdaq during the quarter. Trading volume in U.S. equity markets increased 25.2% during the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the second quarter of 2005 and increased 6.8% during the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2006.
We experience competition in our core domestic trading activities such as execution services; quoting and trading capabilities; and reporting services. Several new entrants to the execution services business engaged in aggressive price competition earlier this year by reducing the trade execution transaction fees they charge their customers. As the second quarter ended, the NYSE and Nasdaq announced new trade execution pricing for NYSE-listed securities. We continually monitor the trade execution transaction fees we charge our customers, particularly our large-volume customers, to insure we remain competitive. Our revenues from the sale of market information products and services are also under competitive threat from other securities exchanges that trade Nasdaq-listed securities. We have in place a program that provides monetary incentives for quoting market participants to send orders and report trades to The Nasdaq Market Center. Nasdaq, however, has changed the percentage shared under this program from time to time throughout 2005 and 2006 and may continue to further alter the terms of the program. In addition, the acquisition of INET, along with our 2004 acquisition of Brut, have accelerated our growth initiatives and enhanced our competitive position.
We aggressively compete for new listings of initial public offerings of both domestic and international companies. Our primary competitor for larger company listings on The Nasdaq Stock Market is the NYSE Group, which was formed by the mergers of the Pacific Exchange, ArcaEx, and the NYSE. The newly-combined NYSE Group has indicated that it intends to expand the listings business of the former Pacific Exchange. Domestically, we also compete, to a limited extent, with the Amex for listing of smaller, less active, companies. Internationally, we compete for listings with a number of major global exchanges including the LSE and NYSE
Group. Nasdaq-sponsored financial products are subject to intense competition from other exchange traded
29
funds, or ETFs, derivatives and structured products as investment alternatives and we are subject to competition for the listing of these products from other exchanges.
The securities industry continues to experience considerable technological and regulatory change. Some of our competitors who have historically supported a floor-based trading model are beginning to more fully automate their processes. While one consequence of these initiatives has been to highlight the advantages of the electronic trading model, another consequence has been to shorten the expected life of legacy hardware and architecture as market centers rapidly innovate in order to offer their customers the best possible platform. In addition, our competitors migration to electronic trading could further increase the competitive pressures on us.
Business Segments
We manage, operate and provide our products and services in two business segments: Market Services and Issuer Services.
| Market Services segment includes our transaction-based business (Nasdaq Market Center) and our market information services business (Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions), which are interrelated because the transaction-based business generates the quote and trade information that we sell to market participants and data vendors. |
| Issuer Services segment includes our securities listings business, our insurance business and shareholder services (Corporate Client Group) and our financial products business (Nasdaq Financial Products). The companies listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market represent a diverse array of industries. This diversity of Nasdaq-listed companies allows us to develop industry-specific and other Nasdaq indexes that we use to develop and license financial products and associated derivatives. |
Because of these interrelationships, our management allocates resources, assesses performance and manages these businesses as two separate segments. See Note 15, Segments, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Sources of Revenues
Market Services
Nasdaq Market Center
The Nasdaq Market Center is our transaction-based platform that provides our market participants with access to The Nasdaq Stock Market execution services, such as quoting and trading capabilities, and reporting services such as trade reporting and risk management. We provide these quoting, trading, and reporting services for securities listed on The Nasdaq Global Market (formerly The Nasdaq National Market) and The Nasdaq Capital Market. Until September 30, 2005, we also provided these services for securities authorized for quotation on the OTCBB, and for securities that are traded in the Over-the-Counter, or OTC, market by NASD members. Effective October 1, 2005, we transferred responsibility for the OTCBB and OTC to NASD.
We provide our customers with the ability to execute trades electronically in equity securities. The primary fee for these execution services is a transaction execution charge, assessed on a per share basis to the party that accesses the liquidity provided by another market participant. In most circumstances, we credit a portion of the per share execution charge as a rebate to the market participant that provides the liquidity. We also earn revenues based on our share of trading securities listed on the NYSE and Amex. Many of our competitors engage in aggressive price competition by reducing the transaction fees they charge customers for trade execution. As a result of this competition, during 2005, we significantly reduced the transaction fees we charge our customers for trade execution, particularly for large-volume customers. In early 2006, in connection with our acquisition of INET, we adjusted our transaction fees to harmonize our pricing structure with INET, whose fees had been higher than ours. We periodically re-examine our pricing structure to ensure that our fees remain competitive.
30
The Nasdaq Market Center also generates revenue by charging fees for trade reporting, trade comparison, order routing and providing risk management services. Although we do not currently charge market participants for most of the trades they report to us, we do earn revenues for all trades reported to us in the form of shared market information revenues under the Nasdaq Unlisted Trading Privileges Plan, or the UTP Plan, in the case of Nasdaq-listed securities and under the Consolidated Tape Plan, or the CTA Plan, and the Consolidated Quotation Plan, or CQ Plan, in the case of exchange-listed securities.
Finally, The Nasdaq Market Center generates revenue by providing market participants with a front-end workstation and by offering several different alternatives to access The Nasdaq Market Center. The type of connectivity is determined by the level of functionality a customer needs. During 2005, we completed the necessary steps to exit a low-margin business related to our legacy service products and associated proprietary network.
Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions
The primary source of revenues for Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions is the collection and dissemination of price quotations and information regarding price and volume of executed trades. We collect information, distribute it and earn revenues in two capacities: as a member of the UTP Plan and as a distributor of our proprietary market data. We also operate as the exclusive Securities Information Processor as part of the UTP Plan for the collection and dissemination of the best bid and offer information and last transaction information from the exchanges and markets that quote and trade in Nasdaq-listed securities.
In our role as the Securities Information Processor, we disseminate information to data vendors, which the data vendors then sell to the public. After deducting expenses incurred as the Securities Information Processor, we distribute the tape fees to the respective UTP Plan participants, including ourselves, based on a combination of the participants respective annual trade volume and share volume. Since our sharing in the UTP Plan is based on our market share, our revenues from the sale of market information products and services are under competitive pressure from other securities exchanges that trade Nasdaq-listed securities. As a result, we have implemented the General Revenue Sharing Program, which provides an incentive for quoting market participants to send orders and report trades to The Nasdaq Market Center to stabilize Nasdaqs share of UTP Plan revenues.
In the second quarter of 2006, upon consultation with the SEC, it was determined that the approval of Amendment 13 to the UTP Plan on February 7, 2006 resulted in the immediate removal of Nasdaq Quotation Dissemination Services, or NQDS, from the UTP Plan. As a result, we were no longer required to share revenues from our individual market participants quotations effective as of February 7, 2006. Prior to this decision, participants had received their UTP share for the first quarter of 2006. Therefore, in the second quarter of 2006, we recorded an adjustment to our UTP Plan revenue sharing to decrease the shared revenues from February 7, 2006 through March 31, 2006, from the plan participants. We still are required to share UTP Plan revenues related to trade reports and the best priced quotations in our market.
We also sell proprietary data products to market participants that choose to display trading interest on The Nasdaq Market Center. We offer a range of proprietary data products including TotalView, our flagship market depth quote product. We operate several other proprietary services and data feed products, including the Mutual Fund Quotation Service, or MFQS; the Mutual Fund Dissemination Service; our financial websites, Nasdaq.com and NasdaqTrader.com; and Nasdaq Index Dissemination Service. Within the past year, we launched Nasdaq OpenView, which is similar to TotalView, but displays market depth for NYSE- and Amex-listed securities and ModelView, a web-based historical data product intended to provide more comprehensive information regarding The Nasdaq Market Center liquidity.
31
Issuer Services
Corporate Client Group
The Corporate Client Group provides customer support services and products to Nasdaq-listed companies and is responsible for obtaining new listings on The Nasdaq Stock Market. We charge issuers an initial listing fee, a fee for listing of additional shares and an annual fee. The initial listing fee for securities listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market includes a listing application fee and a total shares outstanding fee. The fee for listing of additional shares is based on the total shares outstanding, which we review quarterly. Annual fees for securities listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market are based on total shares outstanding. In the beginning of 2005, Nasdaq increased the amount of its annual fees for both The Nasdaq National Market and The Nasdaq Capital Market in a range of approximately 14.0% to 31.0%. Initial listing and listing of additional shares fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over estimated service periods, which are six and four years, respectively, based on our historical listing experience, pursuant to the requirements of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13: Revenue Recognition, or SAB Topic 13.
In the first quarter of 2006, we announced the creation of The Nasdaq Global Select Market, a new listing tier with the highest initial listing standards in the world. The Nasdaq Global Select Market became effective on July 3, 2006 and approximately 1,200 companies qualified for this new market tier. In conjunction with the creation of the new tier, we renamed The Nasdaq National Market, The Nasdaq Global Market. The Nasdaq Capital Market was not renamed. All three market tiers maintain rigorous listing and corporate governance standards and issuers listing on these markets have the opportunity to leverage an array of Nasdaq corporate services.
On January 1, 2005, we purchased the remaining 50.0% interest in the Nasdaq Insurance Agency from AIG for nominal consideration. The agency provides insurance brokerage services and specializes in the director and officer liability insurance market. On October 1, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Carpenter Moore, a San Francisco-based insurance brokerage firm specializing in management liability. The purchases of the Nasdaq Insurance Agency and Carpenter Moore provide current and future Nasdaq-listed companies and other customers with a full service corporate insurance broker offering customized risk management advice and insurance placement services. Carpenter Moore also added depth of brokerage expertise in directors and officers, errors and omissions and other management liability insurance products, and has significantly expanded regional coverage. On February 1, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Shareholder.com, a privately held, Massachusetts-based firm specializing in shareholder communications and investor relations intelligence services. Shareholder.com continues to offer its comprehensive suite of services to all publicly traded companies who wish to optimize investor relations capabilities. Our 2006 results include activity related to Shareholder.com from February 1, 2006 through June 30, 2006. See Purchase Acquisition Shareholder.com, of Note 3, Business Combinations, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Nasdaq Financial Products
Nasdaq develops and licenses Nasdaq-branded indexes, associated derivatives and financial products as part of Nasdaq Financial Products. We believe that these indexes and products leverage, extend and enhance the Nasdaq brand. Nasdaqs license fees for its trademark licenses vary by product based on assets or number or underlying dollar value of contracts issued. In addition to generating licensing revenues for Nasdaq, these products, particularly mutual funds and ETFs lead to increased investments in companies listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market, which enhances our ability to attract new listings.
Nasdaqs ability to collect licensing revenues for options on ETFs that track our indexes (such as QQQ) will most likely be impacted by the recent outcome of two cases involving other index providers. In September 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed actions brought by McGraw-Hill and Dow Jones against an options market that threatened to trade options based on their proprietary indexes without a license. This dismissal was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in June 2006. The Second Circuit ruled that markets, in facilitating the trading of options on ETFs, are not misappropriating any intellectual property right of index providers.
32
Segment Operating Results
Of total second quarter 2006 revenues of $411.0 million, 84.6% was from our Market Services segment and 15.4% was from our Issuer Services segment. Of our total first six months of 2006 revenues of $807.4 million, 84.8% was from our Market Services segment, and 15.2% was from our Issuers Services segment.
The following table shows total revenues by segment, cost of revenues and gross margin:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Market Services |
$ | 347.6 | $ | 163.6 | # | $ | 684.9 | $ | 288.7 | # | ||||||||||||
Issuer Services |
63.4 | 56.1 | 13.0 | % | 122.3 | 110.9 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | 0.2 | 0.2 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
411.0 | 219.7 | 87.1 | % | 807.4 | 399.8 | # | |||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
(239.9 | ) | (89.3 | ) | # | (474.3 | ) | (143.1 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 171.1 | $ | 130.4 | 31.2 | % | $ | 333.1 | $ | 256.7 | 29.8 | % | ||||||||||
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
Market Services
The following table shows revenues, cost of revenues and gross margin from Market Services:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nasdaq Market Center: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Execution and trade reporting revenues |
$ | 291.4 | $ | 116.2 | # | $ | 577.9 | $ | 228.9 | # | ||||||||||||
Access services revenues |
13.1 | 20.3 | (35.5 | )% | 25.4 | 41.2 | (38.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Liquidity rebates(1) |
| | | | (35.5 | ) | # | |||||||||||||||
Tape fee revenue sharing |
(5.3 | ) | (2.4 | ) | # | (10.7 | ) | (4.5 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Total Nasdaq Market Center revenues |
299.1 | 134.0 | # | 592.4 | 229.9 | # | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Liquidity rebates(1) |
(170.6 | ) | (69.2 | ) | # | (337.8 | ) | (104.5 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Brokerage, clearance and exchange fees |
(69.3 | ) | (20.1 | ) | # | (136.5 | ) | (38.6 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
(239.9 | ) | (89.3 | ) | # | (474.3 | ) | (143.1 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Gross margin from Nasdaq Market Center |
59.2 | 44.7 | 32.4 | % | 118.1 | 86.8 | 36.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(2) |
48.7 | 46.0 | 5.9 | % | 100.8 | 92.9 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program |
(2.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | # | (5.5 | ) | (3.2 | ) | 71.9 | % | |||||||||||
UTP Plan revenue sharing |
(6.2 | ) | (19.6 | ) | (68.4 | )% | (19.9 | ) | (39.7 | ) | (49.9 | )% | ||||||||||
Total Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions revenues |
39.9 | 25.2 | 58.3 | % | 75.4 | 50.0 | 50.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Market Services revenues |
8.6 | 4.4 | 95.5 | % | 17.1 | 8.8 | 94.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin from Market Services |
$ | 107.7 | $ | 74.3 | 45.0 | % | $ | 210.6 | $ | 145.6 | 44.6 | % | ||||||||||
33
# | Denotes a variance equal to or greater than 100.0%. |
(1) | Pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, of the FASB, Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, or EITF 99-19, Nasdaq records execution revenues from transactions executed through the Brut and INET platforms on a gross basis in revenues and records expenses such as liquidity rebate payments as cost of revenues as both Brut and INET act as principal. On February 1, 2006, Brut and INET merged under a single broker-dealer, Brut LLC. Before the second quarter of 2005, we reported other execution revenues net of liquidity rebates, which totaled $35.5 million for the first quarter of 2005, as Nasdaq does not act as principal. However, during and since the second quarter of 2005 under Nasdaqs new Limitation of Liability Rule, Nasdaq, subject to certain caps, provides compensation for losses due to malfunctions of the order-execution systems of The Nasdaq Market Center. Therefore, under EITF 99-19, Nasdaq has recorded all execution revenues from transactions executed through The Nasdaq Market Center on a gross basis in execution and trade reporting revenues and has recorded liquidity rebate payments as cost of revenues as Nasdaq now has certain risk associated with trade execution subject to rule limitations and caps. This rule change in fact was made on a prospective basis beginning April 1, 2005 as required under GAAP. This rule change did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of Nasdaq. |
(2) | Includes eligible and non-eligible UTP Plan revenues. Eligible UTP Plan revenues are associated with the calculation and dissemination of the consolidated national best bid and best offer and last sale information. These revenues are shared among UTP Plan participants. Non-eligible UTP Plan revenues are associated with the calculation and dissemination of proprietary Nasdaq information and are not shared among UTP Plan participants. As of February 7, 2006, NQDS, the best quote information for each market participant, revenues are no longer eligible UTP Plan revenues. |
Nasdaq Market Center
Execution and trade reporting revenues increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to the inclusion of INET results as well as increases in market share in Nasdaq-, NYSE- and Amex-listed securities and average daily share volume. In February 2006, we harmonized our pricing on Nasdaq-listed securities across all of our venues and introduced new pricing on NYSE-listed securities, which further contributed to the increase in revenues. The Nasdaq-listed pricing increased the execution fees for Brut and Nasdaqs legacy execution systems, but decreased the execution fees for INET.
Access services revenues decreased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to the retirement of our legacy access service products and associated proprietary network in the fourth quarter of 2005, when we completed the transition to the new Nasdaq workstation. Beginning in 2005, we migrated users away from our legacy access service products towards our new QIX protocol, FIX connectivity and new Nasdaq workstation, all of which operate over third-party networks. By doing so, we have been able to and will continue to reduce our technology and network costs and increase our systems scalability without affecting performance or reliability. Revenues from the discontinued products totaled $15.5 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $32.1 million in the first six months of 2005 and expenses related to the discontinued products were $12.1 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $25.1 million in the first six months of 2005. The industry standards and third-party products are more efficient and cost effective but produce lower revenues. However, these products will contribute more to our operating results than our access services legacy products. Partially offsetting the decrease in the second quarter and the first six months of 2006, were access services revenues from INET and the new Nasdaq workstation and increased revenues from FIX and QIX.
We share tape fee revenues from NYSE- and Amex-listed securities through The Nasdaq Market Center tape fee revenue sharing. We earn tape fee revenues from NYSE- and Amex-listed securities based upon both the
34
percentage of trades reported to The Nasdaq Market Center for securities listed on these exchanges and the size of NYSE and Amex revenue sharing pools. The increases for the second quarter and the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year were primarily due to an increase in our market share in both NYSE- and Amex-listed securities, partially offset by amounts retained that pre-acquisition were shared with INET, and pricing changes in February 2006 which eliminated certain trades from being eligible for revenue sharing.
The Nasdaq Market Center shares revenues under the Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program. This discretionary program requires us to share operating revenue, which is interpreted to mean net revenue after expenses from all services that derive revenue from member trading and trade reporting activity in Nasdaq-listed securities. The program is designed to provide an incentive for quoting market participants to send orders and report trades to The Nasdaq Market Center. The amount of Nasdaq Market Center revenues shared under the Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program was flat quarter over quarter and for the six months.
Nasdaq Market Center liquidity rebates, in which we credit a portion of the per share execution charge to the market participant that provides the liquidity, increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year. The first six months of 2005 comparison includes $35.5 million recorded net in total revenues which was before Nasdaqs new Limitation of Liability Rule. The increases in liquidity rebates were primarily due to increases in market share for transactions executed on the INET platform and NYSE-listed securities. In February 2006, we harmonized our pricing for all of our venues, which increased the per share liquidity rebates for INET, but decreased the per share liquidity rebates for Brut and Nasdaqs legacy execution system. Also beginning February 2006, we began paying rebates on NYSE- and Amex-listed securities.
Brokerage, clearance and exchange fees are additional cost of revenues for Brut and INET platforms. The increases in brokerage, clearance and exchange fees for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year were primarily due to additional activity from INETs operations and increases in market share.
Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions
We provide subscribers with inside quote and last trade information through Level 1, the best quote information for each market participant through NQDS, and all price levels for each market participant through TotalView. These services are provided for securities listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market to both professional and non-professional users. We also provide subscribers with quote information at all price levels for each market participants trading of NYSE- and Amex-listed stocks through OpenView. In addition, we provide MFQS, a service that collects and disseminates daily price and related data for unit investment trusts, mutual funds and money market funds that are subscribers to this service. These subscription revenues, which include eligible and non-eligible UTP Plan revenues, increased for the second quarter and the first six months of 2006 primarily due to an increase in TotalView subscribers compared with the same periods last year. Also contributing to the increases in revenues was an increase in the number of Level 1 non-professional users and functionality improvements to MFQS accompanied by a price increase. In the first quarter of 2006, we had an audit of data usage by a major market distributor which further contributed to the increase in revenues for the first six months of 2006.
We also share Market Services Subscriptions revenues under the Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program. The amount of Nasdaq Market Services Subscriptions revenues shared under the Nasdaq General Revenue Sharing Program increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to changes in the amount shared under the program.
Nasdaq also shares tape fee revenues for Nasdaq-listed securities through the UTP Plan. Under the revenue sharing provision of the UTP Plan, we are permitted to deduct costs associated with acting as the exclusive Securities Information Processor from the total amount of tape fees collected. After these costs are deducted from
35
the tape fees, we distribute to the respective UTP Plan participants, including Nasdaq, their share of tape fees based on a combination of their respective trade volume and share volume. Our tape fee revenue sharing allocated to UTP Plan participants decreased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to 1) a stronger market share, which included INET trade reporting activity for the second quarter and first six months of 2006, decreasing the amount Nasdaq shared with UTP participants, 2) the one time recovery of the amount paid in the first quarter of 2006 for NQDS from February 7, 2006 through March 31, 2006, after it was determined that NQDS was effectively removed from the UTP Plan and 3) lower shareable revenue as NQDS is no longer in the plan.
Other Market Services
Other Market Services revenues increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to a contract between NASD and us for the operations of the OTCBB, which took effect on October 1, 2005. We transferred responsibility for the OTCBB back to NASD, but agreed to continue to operate the OTCBB on a contract basis for two years, subject to renewals.
Issuer Services
The following table shows revenues from Issuer Services:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer Services: |
||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Client Group |
$ | 52.3 | $ | 46.0 | 13.7 | % | $ | 101.0 | $ | 91.1 | 10.9 | % | ||||||
Nasdaq Financial Products |
11.1 | 10.1 | 9.9 | % | 21.3 | 19.8 | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Issuer Services revenues |
$ | 63.4 | $ | 56.1 | 13.0 | % | $ | 122.3 | $ | 110.9 | 10.3 | % | ||||||
Corporate Client Group
The following tables show our revenues from the Corporate Client Group as reported in accordance with GAAP (as reported) and as would be reported on a non-GAAP basis (billed basis). We believe that the presentation of billed basis revenues, as they relate to listing of additional shares and initial listing fees, is a good indicator of current Corporate Client Group activity as billed basis information excludes the effects of recognizing revenues related to initial listing fees and listing of additional shares fees over the six and four year periods, respectively.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
|||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Annual renewal fees |
$ | 26.9 | $ | 26.9 | $ | 26.7 | $ | 26.7 | 0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||
Listing of additional shares fees |
9.2 | 15.5 | 9.5 | 15.0 | (3.2 | )% | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||
Initial listing fees |
6.0 | 6.7 | 7.5 | 5.8 | (20.0 | )% | 15.5 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate Client services |
10.2 | 10.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | # | # | ||||||||||||
Total Corporate Client Group revenues |
$ | 52.3 | $ | 59.3 | $ | 46.0 | $ | 49.8 | 13.7 | % | 19.1 | % | ||||||
36
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
As Reported |
Billed Basis |
|||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Annual renewal fees |
$ | 52.7 | $ | 52.7 | $ | 52.8 | $ | 52.8 | (0.2 | )% | (0.2 | )% | ||||||
Listing of additional shares fees |
18.1 | 26.7 | 18.8 | 25.4 | (3.7 | )% | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||
Initial listing fees |
12.3 | 12.3 | 15.3 | 10.5 | (19.6 | )% | 17.1 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate Client services |
17.9 | 17.9 | 4.2 | 4.2 | # | # | ||||||||||||
Total Corporate Client Group revenues |
$ | 101.0 | $ | 109.6 | $ | 91.1 | $ | 92.9 | 10.9 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
Corporate Client Group revenues are primarily derived from fees for annual renewals, listing of additional shares and initial listings for companies listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Fees are generally calculated based upon total shares outstanding for the issuing company. These fees are initially deferred and amortized over the estimated periods for which the services are provided. Revenues from annual renewal fees are amortized on a pro-rata basis over the calendar year and initial listing fees and listing of additional shares fees are amortized over six and four years, respectively. The difference between the as reported revenues and the billed basis revenues is due to the amortization of fees in accordance with GAAP. See Note 7, Deferred Revenue, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion. Corporate Client services revenues includes revenues from Carpenter Moore for the second quarter and first six months of 2006, from Shareholder.com beginning February 1, 2006 and revenues from NIA and other sources for all periods presented.
Annual renewal fees on both an as reported and billed basis marginally increased for the second quarter of 2006 and marginally decreased for the first six months of 2006, compared with the same periods last year. The number of listed companies decreased in 2006. The number of companies listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market on January 1, 2006 was 3,208 and 3,271 on January 1, 2005, the date on which listed companies are billed their annual fees. The decrease in the number of listed companies in 2006 was due to 332 delistings by Nasdaq during 2005, partially offset by 269 new listings in 2005. The delistings in 2005 were primarily a result of mergers and acquisitions, but were also because of companies failure to meet our listing standards. Partially offsetting the decrease in the number of listed companies was an increase in the average total shares outstanding for The Nasdaq National Market, which increased the annual renewal fees billed. For the second quarter of 2006, additional new listings increased the annual renewal fees.
Listing of additional shares fees decreased on an as reported basis and increased on a billed basis for both the second quarter and first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year. The increases were primarily due to an increase in secondary offerings as well as other additional share activity. There were 54 secondary offerings in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 50 secondary offerings in the second quarter of 2005 and 123 secondary offerings in the first six months of 2006 as compared to 95 secondary offerings in the same period last year.
Initial listing fees decreased on an as reported basis and increased on a billed basis for both the second quarter and first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year. The increases were primarily due to an increase in new listings, including the number of initial public offerings. There were 81 new listings, including 35 initial public offerings in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 66 new listings, including 25 initial public offerings in the second quarter of 2005 and 141 new listings, including 65 initial public offerings in the first six months of 2006 as compared to 118 new listings, including 45 initial public offerings for the same period last year.
Corporate Client services revenues on both an as reported and billed basis increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to revenues generated from the recent acquisitions of Carpenter Moore and Shareholder.com.
37
Nasdaq Financial Products
The following table shows revenues from Nasdaq Financial Products:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Licensing revenues |
$ | 9.7 | $ | 9.1 | 6.6 | % | $ | 18.8 | $ | 18.0 | 4.4 | % | ||||||
Other revenues |
1.4 | 1.0 | 40.0 | % | 2.5 | 1.8 | 38.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total Nasdaq Financial Products revenues |
$ | 11.1 | $ | 10.1 | 9.9 | % | $ | 21.3 | $ | 19.8 | 7.6 | % | ||||||
Licensing revenues increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to higher volume activity for both derivative and third party products as well as increases in third party assets under management.
Expenses
Direct Expenses
The following table shows the details of Nasdaqs direct expenses:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
$ | 48.0 | $ | 36.9 | 30.1 | % | $ | 96.9 | $ | 74.2 | 30.6 | % | ||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
3.8 | 2.0 | 90.0 | % | 8.9 | 3.4 | # | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21.5 | 14.9 | 44.3 | % | 46.0 | 33.1 | 39.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Professional and contract services |
7.3 | 7.0 | 4.3 | % | 16.2 | 14.0 | 15.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Computer operations and data communications |
10.3 | 15.9 | (35.2 | )% | 20.2 | 32.1 | (37.1 | )% | ||||||||||||
Provision for bad debts |
1.8 | (0.7 | ) | # | 1.9 | (0.2 | ) | # | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
8.2 | 7.1 | 15.5 | % | 16.2 | 14.2 | 14.1 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
24.8 | 10.6 | # | 31.5 | 16.0 | 96.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Total direct expenses |
$ | 125.7 | $ | 93.7 | 34.2 | % | $ | 237.8 | $ | 186.8 | 27.3 | % | ||||||||
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
Compensation and benefits expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to our acquisitions of INET, Carpenter Moore and Shareholder.com and higher reduction in force charges. For the second quarter of 2006, the reduction in force charge was $2.6 million compared with a charge of $1.2 million for the second quarter of 2005. For the first six months of 2006, the reduction in force charge was $4.3 million compared with a charge of $1.6 million for the same period of 2005. Headcount increased from 768 employees at June 30, 2005 to 887 employees at June 30, 2006 primarily from our acquisitions. Also contributing to the increases was share-based compensation expense of $2.7 million recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the second quarter of 2006 compared with $0.5 million of expense for the second quarter of 2005 and share-based compensation expense of $5.4 million for the first six months of 2006 compared with $0.8 million for the first six months of 2005. See Note 2, Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement, and Note 10, Share-Based Compensation, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
38
Marketing and advertising expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to costs related to our new listings and dual listing advertisements.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to intangible amortization expense on identifiable intangible assets purchased in connection with the INET, Carpenter Moore and Shareholder.com acquisitions and additional depreciation and amortization expense due to a change in the estimated useful life of some of The Nasdaq Market Center assets due to the migration to the INET trading platform.
Professional and contract services expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to additional costs from our recent acquisitions.
Computer operations and data communications expense decreased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to lower costs associated with providing communication lines to customers due to the retirement of legacy access services products, which we discontinued as of December 31, 2005.
Provision for bad debts increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year. In the second quarter and first six months of 2005, we had a bankruptcy recovery, which resulted in a net benefit for bad debts.
Occupancy expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to additional costs from our recent acquisitions.
General and administrative expense increased for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006 compared with the same periods last year primarily due to an additional loss on the early extinguishment of debt, the refinancing of our $750.0 million senior term debt and a loss on the write down of a held-for-sale building. In the second quarter and first six months of 2006, we recorded a $12.3 million loss on the early extinguishment of the $750.0 million senior term debt issued in December 2005, which was refinanced in April 2006. An additional $8.6 million loss was recorded on the early extinguishment of the portion of the $1.1 billion secured term loan of our April 2006 Credit Facility that was repaid in May 2006 as a result of the equity offering. In the second quarter and first six months of 2005, we also had a $7.4 million loss on the restructuring of the $240.0 million convertible notes. Also contributing to the increases was a $5.4 million charge recorded on the write down of a held-for-sale building to fair market value. These increases were partially offset by a realized foreign currency gain related to our investment in the LSE of $8.2 million. In the first quarter of 2006, we recorded a $2.1 million charge associated with potential fines or penalties for Bruts obligations regarding short sales, firm quotes and other reporting and disclosure requirements, which further contributed to the increase in expense for the first six months of 2006.
Support Costs From Related Parties, net
Support costs from related parties, net were $9.1 million for the second quarter of 2006 as compared with $10.4 million for the second quarter of 2005, a decrease of 12.5% and $17.2 million for the first six months of 2006 as compared with $20.8 million for the first six months of 2005, a decrease of 17.3%. These decreases are primarily due to the transfer of ownership of the OTCBB to NASD, which reduced the associated regulatory costs.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense was $18.1 million for the second quarter of 2006 as compared with $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2005 and $30.1 million for the first six months of 2006 as compared with $3.0 million for the first six months of 2005. These increases were primarily due to additional interest expense on the April 2006
39
Credit Facility and the Credit Facilities resulting from the purchase of issued share capital of the LSE. For the first six months of 2006, the increase was also due to additional interest expense from our $205 million convertible notes issued in April 2005 and from our $750 million senior term debt issued in December 2005 to finance the INET acquisition, partially offset by a lower interest coupon rate on our $240 million convertible notes.
Dividend Income
Dividend income was $9.2 million for the second quarter and for the first six months of 2006. Dividend income represents an ordinary dividend received from our investment in the LSE.
Minority Interest
Minority interest was $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2006 and $0.5 million for the first six months of 2006. We began recording minority interest for Reuters minority investment in the Independent Research Network beginning in the third quarter of 2005.
Income Taxes
Our income tax provision was $11.1 million for the second quarter of 2006 as compared with $10.8 million for the second quarter of 2005, an increase of 2.8% and $23.1 million for the first six months of 2006 as compared with $19.4 million for the first six months of 2005, an increase of 19.1%. The overall effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2006 was 40.0% and was 43.6% in the second quarter of 2005. The overall effective tax rate in the first six months of 2006 was 40.0% and was 42.0% in the first six months of 2005. The higher effective tax rate in 2005 was primarily due to a loss on the restructuring of the $240 million convertible notes, a portion of which is not deductible for tax purposes due to the conversion feature.
The effective tax rate may vary from period to period depending on, among other factors, the geographic and business mix of earnings and losses. These and other factors, including history of pre-tax earnings and losses, are taken into account in assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require cash to pay our operating expenses, make capital expenditures and service our debt and other long-term liabilities. Our principal source of funds is cash from our operations. We also have a $75.0 million revolving credit facility under our Credit Facilities to borrow funds. In addition, we have obtained funds by selling our common stock in the capital markets. In the near term, we expect that our operations will provide sufficient cash to fund our operating expenses, capital expenditures and interest payments on our debt. In the long-term, we may use both internally generated funds and external sources to satisfy our debt and other long-term liabilities.
Principal factors that could affect the availability of our internally-generated funds include:
| deterioration of our revenues in either of our business segments, |
| changes in our working capital requirements, and |
| an increase in our expenses. |
Principal factors that could affect our ability to obtain cash from external sources include:
| financial covenants contained in our Credit Facilities that limit our total borrowing capacity, |
| increases in interest rates applicable to our floating rate term debt, |
| credit rating downgrades, which could limit our access to additional debt, |
40
| a decrease in the market price of our common stock, and |
| volatility in the public equity markets. |
The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our cash flows, contractual obligations and other commitments on our liquidity and capital resources.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments and Changes in Cash Flow
The following tables summarize our cash and cash equivalents and investments and changes in cash flow:
June 30, 2006 |
December 31, 2005 |
Percentage Change | ||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 488.8 | $ | 165.2 | # | |||
Available-for-sale investments, at fair value(1) |
1,215.5 | 179.4 | # | |||||
Total |
$ | 1,704.3 | $ | 344.6 | # | |||
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
(1) | Available-for-sale investments include our $1.1 billion investment in the LSE. |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Percentage Change |
||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||
(in millions) | |||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 87.3 | $ | 95.0 | (8.1 | )% | |||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(1,102.4 | ) | (30.3 | ) | # | ||||||
Cash provided by financing activities |
1,338.7 | 181.4 | # |
# | Denotes a variance greater than 100.0%. |
Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments. Cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments increased primarily as a result of our investment in the LSE, the receipt of funds from Nasdaqs equity offerings in the first quarter of 2006 and May 2006, the receipt of a capital return and ordinary dividend from the LSE, the collection of annual listing fees and positive cash flow. These increases were partially offset by cash used to purchase our stake in the LSE, redeem our Series C Cumulative preferred stock, pay debt obligations and acquire Shareholder.com.
Cash provided by operating activities. The following items impacted our cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
| Decrease in other operating liabilities of $48.8 million, mainly due to a decrease in accrued personnel costs of $19.5 million, reflecting payments associated with severance liabilities and a decrease in other accrued liabilities, payables to related parties and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $27.4 million due to timing of payments. |
Offset by increases in:
| Non-cash charges of approximately $52.0 million, comprised primarily of depreciation and amortization of $46.0 million and loss on the early extinguishment and refinancing of debt obligations of $20.9 million. |
| Net income of $34.6 million. |
We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, accounts receivable collections, stock option expensing and the timing and amount of other payments that we make.
41
Cash used in investing activities. The increase in cash used in investing activities is primarily attributable to purchases of available-for-sale investments, including our purchase of LSE shares, and our acquisition of Shareholder.com, partially offset by proceeds from redemptions and maturities of available-for-sale investments.
Cash provided by financing activities. Cash provided by financing activities increased primarily because of the proceeds we received from debt obligations and the net proceeds from our equity offerings in the first quarter of 2006 and May 2006, partially offset by funds used for payments of debt obligations and the redemption of our Series C Cumulative preferred stock.
Capital Resources and Working Capital
Working capital (calculated as current assets less current liabilities) was $1.6 billion at June 30, 2006, compared with $271.6 million at December 31, 2005, an increase of $1.4 billion. This increase was primarily due to our investment in the LSE and an increase in cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments as discussed above.
We have historically been able to generate sufficient funds from operations to meet working capital requirements. At June 30, 2006, except for the un-drawn $75.0 million revolving credit facility obtained in connection with the Credit Facilities, we did not have any lines of credit. See Credit Facilities, of Note 8, Debt Obligations, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
At June 30, 2006, none of our lenders were affiliated with Nasdaq, except to the extent, if any, that H&F and SLP would be deemed affiliates of Nasdaq due to their ownership of the $240 million convertible notes and $205 million convertible notes and associated warrants.
Broker Dealer Net Capital Requirements
Our broker-dealer subsidiaries, Brut, INET and Island Execution Services, LLC, are subject to regulatory requirements intended to ensure their general financial soundness and liquidity, which require that they comply with minimum capital requirements. On February 1, 2006, Brut and INET merged under a single broker-dealer, Brut LLC. At June 30, 2006, Brut LLC was required to maintain minimum net capital of $0.3 million and had total net capital of approximately $42.9 million or $42.6 million in excess of the minimum amount required. At June 30, 2006, Island Execution Services was also required to maintain minimum net capital of $0.3 million and had total net capital of approximately $1.6 million or $1.3 million in excess of the minimum amount required.
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Commitments
We have contractual obligations to make future payments under long-term debt, long-term non-cancelable lease agreements and other obligations and have contingent commitments under a variety of arrangements. Contractual obligations, as previously disclosed in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, have not materially changed. However, in the second quarter of 2006, we entered into credit facilities to finance the purchases of LSE shares. See Note 8, Debt Obligations, and Note 14, Commitments and Contingencies, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Credit Facilities
In the second quarter of 2006, we entered into credit facilities to finance the purchase of the LSE shares. At June 30, 2006, total debt obligations outstanding under the Credit Facilities were $1.26 billion including a $75.0 million revolving credit facility still available to drawdown under the Credit Facilities. See Note 8, Debt Obligations, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Our significant debt has resulted in the downgrading of our credit rating by Moodys to Ba3 from Ba2 and by Standard & Poors to BB+ from BBB-. In addition, Moodys lowered its ratings outlook to negative from stable and Standard & Poors has put our credit outlook as developing.
42
The Credit Facilities covenants restrict our ability to grant liens, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, sell assets, make restricted payments, conduct transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate. In addition, our convertible notes contain a covenant restricting our ability to incur senior debt, and as a consequence of our current debt outstanding under our Credit Facilities, our convertible notes would not permit us to incur additional senior debt without consent.
May 2006 Public Equity Offering
On May 2, 2006, we sold 18,500,000 shares of our common stock in a public offering for net proceeds of $665.2 million, before the deduction of offering expenses, which was used to prepay a portion of the amount outstanding under the $1.1 billion secured term loan of our April 2006 Credit Facility. See of Note 8, Debt Obligations, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Investments
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities. See Note 6, Investments, to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses, including foreign currency fluctuations, reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax where applicable.
Fixed Income Securities
As of June 30, 2006, our fixed income securities have an average duration of 0.24 years. Our primary investment objective for fixed income securities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields, without significantly increasing risk. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and their fair values may fluctuate with changes in interest rates. However, management does not believe that a 100 basis point fluctuation in market interest rates will have a material effect on the carrying value of our fixed income securities at June 30, 2006.
Investment in the LSE
As of June 30, 2006, we own 25.3% of the issued share capital of the LSE. The cost of this investment is approximately GBP 650.3 million. This investment is accounted for under SFAS 115 and as indicated above any unrealized gains or losses, including foreign currency fluctuations are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income until sold or redeemed.
The fair market value of our investment in the LSE is subject to market price volatility. As of June 30, 2006 the gross unrealized loss on our investment in the LSE was $61.9 million which was partially offset by a foreign currency translation adjustment gain of approximately $31.0 million.
Nasdaq regularly monitors and evaluates the realizable value of its investment security portfolio. When assessing securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider such factors as, among other things, the duration for which the market value had been less than cost, any news that has been released specific to the investee, analyst coverage and the outlook for the overall industry in which the investee operates. For equity securities we also consider the performance of the investees stock price in relation to industry indexes and review the investees credit profile. There were no impairment charges recorded on our investments during the first six months of 2006 or 2005.
As of June 30, 2006, there were no hedges on our investments. However we periodically reevaluate our hedging policies and may choose to enter into future transactions. Nasdaq does not currently hedge any variable interest rates on these securities.
43
Debt Obligations
At June 30, 2006, both our $205 million and $240 million convertible notes specify fixed interest rates until October 22, 2012. However, our Credit Facilities specify floating interest rates until maturity in April 2012 and are therefore subject to interest rate risk. Management does not believe that a 100 basis point fluctuation in market interest rates will have a material effect on the carrying value of our outstanding floating rate debt obligations at June 30, 2006. However, due to the stock appreciation on the convertible option feature from $14.50 at the time of issuance to $29.90 at June 30, 2006, the fair value of Nasdaqs convertible notes exceeds its carrying value.
As of June 30, 2006, Nasdaq does not currently hedge any variable interest rates on our debt obligations. However we periodically reevaluate our hedging policies and may choose to enter into future transactions.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk from third parties, including customers, counterparties and clearing agents. These parties may default on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure or other reasons. In particular, our subsidiary Brut may be exposed to credit risk, due to the default of trading counterparties, in connection with the external routing and agency brokerage services Brut provides its customers through the Brut and INET platforms. Although Brut and INET merged under a single broker-dealer, these entities will continue to operate as two separate limit order books, with separate matching and routing systems, as well as clearing relationships until the complete integration of The Nasdaq Market Center and the Brut and INET execution systems into a single platform during the fourth quarter of 2006. While we are not exposed to counterparty risk for trades executed on The Nasdaq Market Center, we are exposed to counterparty risk in connection with trades executed on or through the Brut ECN and INET ECN systems, or Brut and INET System Trades, given that Brut, acts as central counterparty on an agency basis for these trades.
Brut System Trades in Nasdaq-listed securities and NYSE-listed securities routed to the NYSE DOT system with broker-dealer clients are cleared by Brut, as a member of the National Securities Clearing Corporation, or NSCC. INET System Trades in Nasdaq-listed securities and NYSE-listed securities routed to the NYSE with broker-dealer clients were cleared pursuant to a clearing agreement with Instinet Clearing Services, Inc., or ICS. As of May 31, 2006, INETs clearing agreement with ICS was terminated. Effective June 1, 2006, INET System Trades were cleared by Brut.
Pursuant to the rules of the NSCC and Bruts clearing agreement, Brut is liable for any losses incurred due to a counterparty or a clearing agents failure to satisfy its contractual obligations, either by making payment or delivering securities. Adverse movements in the prices of securities that are subject to these transactions can increase our credit risk. However, we believe that the risk of material loss is limited, as Brut customers are not permitted to trade on margin and NSCC rules limit counterparty risk on self-cleared transactions by establishing credit limit and capital deposit requirements for all brokers that clear with NSCC. Brut has never incurred a liability due to a customers failure to satisfy its contractual obligations as a counterparty to a Brut System Trade. Credit difficulties or insolvency or the perceived possibility of credit difficulties or insolvency of one or more larger or visible market participants could also result in market-wide credit difficulties or other market disruptions. We also have credit risk related to transaction fees that are billed to customers on a monthly basis, in arrears. Our potential exposure to credit losses on these transactions is represented by the receivable balances in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our customers are financial institutions whose ability to satisfy their contractual obligations may be impacted by volatile securities markets. Credit losses such as those described above could adversely affect our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
As a result of INETs relationship with ICS, INET was exposed to substantial credit risk from both parties to a securities transaction during the period between the transaction date and the settlement date. Adverse movements in the prices of these securities could have increased our credit risk. All of INETs transactions and,
44
consequently, the concentration of its credit exposure are with broker-dealers primarily located in the United States. INET seeks to control its credit risk through a variety of reporting and control procedures, including establishing credit limits and enforcing credit standards based upon a review of the counterparties financial condition and credit rating. INET monitors trading activity and collateral levels on a daily basis for compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines and obtains additional collateral, if appropriate. As noted above, INETs clearing agreement with ICS was terminated on May 31, 2006. Effective June 1, 2006, INET System Trades were cleared by Brut.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a). Disclosure controls and procedures. Nasdaqs management, with the participation of Nasdaqs President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Nasdaqs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, Nasdaqs President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Nasdaqs disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b). Internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in Nasdaqs internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Nasdaqs internal control over financial reporting.
45
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings disclosed in our 2005 Form 10-K.
Please refer to our most recent Form 10-K and March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q to read about the material risks we face.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Repurchases made in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (in whole number of shares):
Period |
(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Units) |
(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |||||
April 2006 |
| | | | |||||
May 2006 |
43,803 | $ | 36.78 | | | ||||
June 2006 |
44,063 | $ | 16.00 | | | ||||
Total |
87,866 | | | | |||||
The shares repurchased during May 2006 were acquired from employees in connection with the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from vesting in restricted stock grants. The shares repurchased during June 2006 represent warrant shares that were originally purchased by INET from NASD in our 2000 and 2001 private placements. We acquired these warrant shares in connection with our acquisition of INET. We paid NASD approximately $0.7 million for these warrant shares, which were immediately retired to common stock in treasury.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
None
The exhibits required by this item are listed on the Exhibit Index.
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET, INC. (Registrant) | ||||
Date: August 8, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ ROBERT GREIFELD | ||
Name: Title: |
Robert Greifeld President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: August 8, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID P. WARREN | ||
Name: Title: |
David P. Warren Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
47
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
Exhibit Name | |
3.1 | Certificate of Elimination (previously filed with Nasdaqs Current Report on Form 8-K on April 4, 2006). | |
10.1 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2006 among The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and the other parties thereto (previously filed with Nasdaqs Current Report on Form 8-K on May 24, 2006). | |
10.2 | Amended and Restated Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2006, among The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., Nightingale Acquisition Limited and the other parties thereto (previously filed with Nasdaqs Current Report on Form 8-K on May 24, 2006). | |
11.1 | Computation of Per Share Earnings (omitted in accordance with section (b)(11) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K). The calculation of per share earnings is set forth in Part I, Item 1, in Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Earnings Per Common Share). | |
31.1 | Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley. |