UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
Commission File No. 1-8968
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Incorporated in the |
Employer Identification |
State of Delaware |
No. 76-0146568 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _____.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company. Yes No X .
The number of shares outstanding of the Company's common stock as of June 30, 2006 is shown below:
Title of Class |
Number of Shares Outstanding |
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share |
459,467,915 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
|||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ |
627 |
$ |
659 |
$ |
1,371 |
$ |
1,260 |
||||||||
Oil and condensate sales |
1,007 |
601 |
1,808 |
1,241 |
||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales |
138 |
104 |
245 |
206 |
||||||||||||
Other sales |
37 |
30 |
86 |
38 |
||||||||||||
Total |
1,809 |
1,394 |
3,510 |
2,745 |
||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Direct operating |
150 |
106 |
284 |
213 |
||||||||||||
Transportation and cost of product |
100 |
66 |
183 |
128 |
||||||||||||
General and administrative |
123 |
98 |
228 |
188 |
||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
362 |
277 |
655 |
548 |
||||||||||||
Other taxes |
101 |
90 |
208 |
171 |
||||||||||||
Impairments |
5 |
- |
18 |
|||||||||||||
Total |
841 |
637 |
1,576 |
1,248 |
||||||||||||
Operating Income |
968 |
757 |
1,934 |
1,497 |
||||||||||||
Interest Expense and Other (Income) Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
51 |
51 |
104 |
105 |
||||||||||||
Other (income) expense |
(7 |
) |
7 |
(7 |
) |
5 |
||||||||||
Total |
44 |
58 |
97 |
110 |
||||||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes |
924 |
699 |
1,837 |
1,387 |
||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense |
261 |
260 |
609 |
520 |
||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations |
663 |
439 |
1,228 |
867 |
||||||||||||
Income from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes |
152 |
68 |
248 |
131 |
||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ |
815 |
$ |
507 |
$ |
1,476 |
$ |
998 |
||||||||
Preferred Stock Dividends |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
$ |
814 |
$ |
506 |
$ |
1,474 |
$ |
996 |
||||||||
Per Common Share |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations - basic |
$ |
1.44 |
$ |
0.93 |
$ |
2.67 |
$ |
1.83 |
||||||||
Continuing operations - diluted |
$ |
1.43 |
$ |
0.92 |
$ |
2.65 |
$ |
1.81 |
||||||||
Discontinued operations - basic |
$ |
0.33 |
$ |
0.14 |
$ |
0.54 |
$ |
0.28 |
||||||||
Discontinued operations - diluted |
$ |
0.33 |
$ |
0.14 |
$ |
0.53 |
$ |
0.28 |
||||||||
Net income - basic |
$ |
1.77 |
$ |
1.07 |
$ |
3.21 |
$ |
2.11 |
||||||||
Net income - diluted |
$ |
1.76 |
$ |
1.06 |
$ |
3.18 |
$ |
2.09 |
||||||||
Dividends |
$ |
0.09 |
$ |
0.09 |
$ |
0.18 |
$ |
0.18 |
||||||||
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Basic |
459 |
472 |
460 |
473 |
||||||||||||
Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted |
463 |
477 |
464 |
477 |
||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
|
June 30, |
December 31, |
||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
671 |
$ |
561 |
||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance: |
||||||||
Customers |
982 |
1,109 |
||||||
Others |
343 |
562 |
||||||
Other current assets |
207 |
207 |
||||||
Current assets held for sale |
369 |
477 |
||||||
Total |
2,572 |
2,916 |
||||||
Properties and Equipment |
||||||||
Original cost (includes unproved properties of $1,340 and $1,198 |
||||||||
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) |
24,825 |
23,132 |
||||||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
8,592 |
7,935 |
||||||
Net properties and equipment - based on the full cost method |
||||||||
of accounting for oil and gas properties |
16,233 |
15,197 |
||||||
Other Assets |
609 |
561 |
||||||
Goodwill |
1,092 |
1,089 |
||||||
Long-Term Assets Held for Sale |
3,159 |
2,825 |
||||||
Total Assets |
$ |
23,665 |
$ |
22,588 |
||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION |
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued) |
||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
|
June 30, |
December 31, |
||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ |
1,262 |
$ |
1,485 |
||||
Accrued expenses |
428 |
499 |
||||||
Current debt |
211 |
80 |
||||||
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale |
306 |
339 |
||||||
Total |
2,207 |
2,403 |
||||||
Long-term Debt |
3,361 |
3,547 |
||||||
Other Long-term Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,070 |
3,993 |
||||||
Other |
951 |
819 |
||||||
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale |
712 |
775 |
||||||
Total |
5,733 |
5,587 |
||||||
Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share (2.0 million shares authorized, |
||||||||
0.05 million and 0.09 million shares issued as of June 30, 2006 and |
46 |
89 |
||||||
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share (1.0 billion and 450.0 million |
||||||||
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) |
46 |
27 |
||||||
Paid-in capital |
5,310 |
6,063 |
||||||
Retained earnings |
6,626 |
6,957 |
||||||
Treasury stock (34.4 million shares as of December 31, 2005) |
- |
(2,423 |
) |
|||||
Executives and Directors Benefits Trust, at market value (4.0 million and |
||||||||
2.0 million shares as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) |
(189 |
) |
(189 |
) |
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
(105 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
646 |
549 |
||||||
Minimum pension liability |
(16 |
) |
(17 |
) |
||||
Total |
525 |
527 |
||||||
Total |
12,364 |
11,051 |
||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
- |
- |
||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
$ |
23,665 |
$ |
22,588 |
||||
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
$ |
814 |
$ |
506 |
$ |
1,474 |
$ |
996 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Preferred Stock Dividends |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income Available to Common Stockholders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before Preferred Stock Dividends |
815 |
507 |
1,476 |
998 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Income Taxes |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) during the period1 |
(63 |
) |
3 |
(100 |
) |
(79 |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net income2 |
- |
25 |
- |
29 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
(63 |
) |
28 |
(100 |
) |
(50 |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments3 |
99 |
(27 |
) |
97 |
(37 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability4 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
36 |
1 |
(2 |
) |
(87 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
$ |
851 |
$ |
508 |
$ |
1,474 |
$ |
911 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1 net of income tax benefit (expense) of: |
$ |
38 |
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
59 |
$ |
46 |
||||||||||||||||||||
2 net of income tax expense of: |
- |
(15 |
) |
- |
(17 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
3 net of income tax benefit (expense) of: |
(15 |
) |
3 |
(14 |
) |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
4 net of income tax expense of: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
Six Months Ended |
||||||||
June 30 |
||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||
Cash Flow from Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,476 |
$ |
998 |
||||
Less income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
(248 |
) |
(131 |
) |
||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by |
||||||||
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
655 |
548 |
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
133 |
118 |
||||||
Impairments |
18 |
- |
||||||
Other noncash items |
27 |
23 |
||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
345 |
118 |
||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(476 |
) |
(28 |
) |
||||
Other items - net |
(81 |
) |
(87 |
) |
||||
Cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations |
1,849 |
1,559 |
||||||
Cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations |
330 |
172 |
||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,179 |
1,731 |
||||||
Cash Flow from Investing Activities |
||||||||
Additions to properties and equipment |
(1,679 |
) |
(1,285 |
) |
||||
Sales of properties and equipment |
5 |
141 |
||||||
Cash used in investing activities - continuing operations |
(1,674 |
) |
(1,144 |
) |
||||
Cash used in investing activities - discontinued operations |
(345 |
) |
(223 |
) |
||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,019 |
) |
(1,367 |
) |
||||
Cash Flow from Financing Activities |
||||||||
Additions to debt |
20 |
4 |
||||||
Retirements of debt |
(30 |
) |
(170 |
) |
||||
Increase in accounts payable, banks |
140 |
34 |
||||||
Dividends paid |
(85 |
) |
(88 |
) |
||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(122 |
) |
(199 |
) |
||||
Retirement of preferred stock |
(43 |
) |
- |
|||||
Issuance of common stock |
60 |
98 |
||||||
Cash used in financing activities - continuing operations |
(60 |
) |
(321 |
) |
||||
Cash used in financing activities - discontinued operations |
(28 |
) |
7 |
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(88 |
) |
(314 |
) |
||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash |
||||||||
Discontinued operations |
9 |
(9 |
) |
|||||
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
81 |
41 |
||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
739 |
874 |
||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
$ |
820 |
$ |
915 |
||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation is engaged in the exploration, development, production and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). The Company also engages in the hard minerals business through non-operated joint ventures and royalty arrangements in several coal, trona (natural soda ash) and industrial mineral mines. The terms "Anadarko" and "Company" refer to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries.The information, as furnished herein, reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of financial position as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
In preparing financial statements, management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to litigation, environmental liabilities, income taxes, fair values and determination of proved reserves. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Discontinued Operations Certain amounts have been reclassified to present the Company's Canadian oil and gas business as discontinued operations. Unless otherwise indicated, information presented in the notes to the financial statements relates only to Anadarko's continuing operations. See Note 4.
Derivative Instruments The derivative instruments utilized by Anadarko are in conjunction with its marketing and trading activities or are used to manage the price risk attributable to the Company's expected oil and gas production. Anadarko also periodically utilizes derivatives to manage its exposure associated with interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. All derivatives, other than those that meet the normal purchases and sales exception, are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.
For those derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, Anadarko formally documents the hedging relationship including the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. Each hedge is also assessed for effectiveness quarterly. Under hedge accounting, the derivatives may be designated as a hedge of exposure to changes in fair values, cash flows or foreign currencies. If the hedge relates to the exposure of fair value changes to a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, the unrealized gains and losses on the derivative and the unrealized gains and losses on the hedged item are both recognized currently in earnings. If the hedge relates to exposure of variability in the cash flow of a forecasted transaction, the effective portion of the unrealized gains and losses on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction is recorded. The ineffective portion of unrealized gains and losses attributable to cash flow hedges, if any, is recognized currently in earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness is that portion of the derivative's unrealized gains and losses that exceed the hedged item's unrealized gains and losses. In those instances where it becomes probable that a hedged forecasted transaction will not occur, the unrealized gain or loss is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings in the current period. Accounting for unrealized gains and losses attributable to foreign currency hedges that qualify for hedge accounting is dependent on whether the hedge is a fair value or a cash flow hedge. Unrealized gains and losses attributable to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized currently in earnings.
The Company's derivative instruments are either exchange traded or transacted in an over-the-counter market. Valuation is determined by reference to readily available public data. Option valuations are based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 8.
Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value method. The Company grants various types of stock-based awards including stock options, nonvested equity shares (restricted stock) and performance-based awards. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Restricted stock awards are valued using the market price on grant-date. For performance-based awards, the fair value of the market condition portion of the award is measured using a Monte Carlo simulation and the performance condition portion of the award is measured at the market price of the Company's common stock on the grant-date. Liability classified awards are valued at the end of each period based on the specifications of each plan. The Company records compensation expense for stock-based compensation awards over the requisite service period. For equity awards that contain service and market conditions, compensation expense is recorded using the straight-line method. If the requisite service period is satisfied, expense is not adjusted unless the award contains a performance condition. If an award contains a performance condition, expense is recognized only for those shares that ultimately vest using the fair value per share measured at grant-date. See Note 2.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in previous mergers and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2006, $107 million of goodwill was allocated to and included in Long-term Assets Held for Sale on the consolidated balance sheet. Future changes in goodwill may result from, among other things, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in deferred income tax liabilities related to previous acquisitions, divestitures, impairments or future acquisitions or divestitures.
Earnings Per Share The Company's basic earnings per share (EPS) amounts have been computed based on the average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS amounts include the effect of the Company's outstanding stock options and performance-based stock awards under the treasury stock method, if including such potential shares of common stock is dilutive. See Note 10.
New Accounting Principles In January 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment," using the modified prospective method. See Note 2.
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109", was issued in 2006 and will be effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of uncertain tax return positions in the financial statements. The Company cannot reasonably determine the impact of FIN 48 on its financial statements at this time.
Effective January 2003, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for share-based employee compensation using the prospective method described in SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure." Effective January 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense related to share-based compensation as opposed to recognizing these forfeitures and the corresponding reduction in expense as they occur. The related cumulative adjustment as of January 1, 2006 of $2 million before income taxes was recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expense in 2006 and was not presented separately in the income statement due to immateriality. Results for prior periods have not been restated. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have a material impact on the Company's income before income taxes, net income or basic and diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The effect on net income and earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2005, had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to all options, was not material.
Activities and balances presented include amounts associated with discontinued operations. All share and price per share information presented has been restated to reflect the May 2006 two-for-one stock split which was effected in the form of a stock dividend. See Note 10.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company reported amounts attributable to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation in the financial statements (excess tax benefits) in the statement of cash flows as operating activities in other items, net. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits to be classified as financing cash flows. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, $20 million in excess tax benefits were included in cash flow from financing activities. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, $21 million in excess tax benefits were included in cash flow from operating activities.
The Company generally issues new shares to satisfy employee share-based payment plans. At June 30, 2006, 16 million shares of the 47 million shares of Anadarko common stock originally authorized for awards under the active share-based compensation plans remain available for future issuance. The compensation expense that has been recorded for the awards was $23 million and $20 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $8 million and $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Compensation cost capitalized as part of properties and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8 million and $6 million, respectively.
Cash received from stock option exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $40 million and $98 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from share-based payment arrangements totaled $20 million and $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Equity Classified Awards
Stock Options Certain employees may be granted options to purchase shares of Anadarko common stock under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. Stock options are granted at the fair market value of Anadarko common stock on the date of grant and have a maximum term of seven years from the date of grant. Stock options vest over service periods ranging from one to four years.
Nonemployee directors may be granted nonqualified stock options under the 1998 Director Stock Plan. Stock options are granted at the fair market value of Anadarko common stock on the date of grant and have a maximum term of ten years from the date of grant. Stock options vest over service periods ranging from the date of grant up to two years.
The fair value of stock option awards is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the expected life of the option was estimated based upon historical exercise behavior. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the expected forfeiture rate was estimated separately. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the volatility assumption was based upon historical implied volatilities over a term commensurate with the expected life of the option. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the volatility assumption was based upon historical price volatility over a term commensurate with the expected life of the option. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the risk-free interest rate was based on the continuous rate provided by the U.S. Treasury for a term commensurate with the expected life of the option. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the dividend yield assumed a constant annual dividend yield. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, the dividend yield was based on a historical dividend yield. The Company used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||
Expected option life - years |
4.5 |
5.2 |
||||
Volatility |
30.5 |
% |
32.8 |
% |
||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.7 |
% |
4.1 |
% |
||
Dividend yield |
0.8 |
% |
0.7 |
% |
A summary of stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is summarized below:
Weighted- |
Weighted- |
Aggregate |
|||||||||||
Shares |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
9.57 |
$ |
25.57 |
||||||||||
Granted |
.05 |
$ |
52.03 |
||||||||||
Exercised |
(1.82) |
$ |
21.80 |
||||||||||
Forfeited or expired |
(0.01) |
$ |
35.66 |
||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
7.79 |
$ |
26.60 |
3.4 |
$ |
161 |
|||||||
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2006 |
7.16 |
$ |
26.31 |
3.2 |
$ |
150 |
|||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
5.36 |
$ |
24.02 |
2.4 |
$ |
125 |
|||||||
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $16.10 and $13.23, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $55 million and $58 million, respectively, based on the difference between the market price at the exercise date and the option price. As of June 30, 2006, there was $14 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
Restricted Stock Shares of common stock may be granted to certain employees and nonemployee directors as restricted stock under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1998 Director Stock Plan. Restricted stock is subject to forfeiture restrictions and cannot be sold, transferred or disposed of during the restriction period. The holders of the restricted stock generally have the same rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive dividends or other distributions paid with respect to the shares. Restricted stock awards vest over service periods ranging from the date of grant up to four years.
A summary of restricted stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:
Weighted-Average |
|||||||||||||||
Shares |
|||||||||||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
3.11 |
$ |
34.92 |
||||||||||||
Granted |
0.09 |
$ |
51.48 |
||||||||||||
Vested |
(0.26) |
$ |
35.94 |
||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(0.05) |
$ |
35.53 |
||||||||||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
2.89 |
$ |
35.31 |
||||||||||||
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $38.49. The total fair value of restricted shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $13 million and $5 million, respectively, based on the market price at the vesting date. As of June 30, 2006, there was $69 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
Performance-Based Share Awards Anadarko and key officers of the Company have two Performance Unit Agreements with three-year terms under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The agreements provide for issuance of up to a maximum of 200,400 shares of Anadarko common stock after a three-year performance period ending in 2007 and a maximum of 506,000 shares of Anadarko common stock after a three-year performance period ending in 2008. The number of shares to be issued will be determined based on a market objective and a performance objective. The shares are equally weighted between the two objectives. The number of performance units to be issued with respect to the first objective will be determined by comparing the Company's total shareholder return to the total shareholder return of a predetermined group of peer companies over the performance period. The number of performance units to be issued with respect to the second objective will be determined based on the Company's reserve replacement efficiency ratio over the performance period. The fair value per share for the performance conditions is $31.54 and $47.14 for the three-year periods ending 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Anadarko and a key officer of the Company have entered into a Performance Share Agreement under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. The agreement provides for issuance of up to 160,000 shares of Anadarko common stock after a two-year performance period that ended in 2005 and a four-year performance period ending in 2007. The number of shares to be issued is determined by comparing the Company's total shareholder return to the total shareholder return of a predetermined group of peer companies. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, 28,800 shares were issued for the performance period that ended in 2005 with a fair value of $2 million.
As of June 30, 2006, there was $12 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to performance-based share awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
Liability Classified Awards
Long-Term Incentive Cash Program The Company offers a cash incentive program to employees of the Company's Canadian subsidiary that provides potential cash payments based upon attainment of specified Anadarko stock price targets. The awards vest over service periods of two years from the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant. The liability outstanding as of June 30, 2006 related to the program was $11 million. As of June 30, 2006, there was $2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the program, which is expected to be recognized over the next four months.
Value Creation Plan The Company offers a cash incentive program that provides employees the opportunity to earn cash bonus awards based on the Company's total shareholder return for the year compared to the total shareholder return of a predetermined group of peer companies. As of June 30, 2006, no liability was required to be recorded for this plan.
3. Pending Acquisitions
In June 2006, Anadarko signed separate agreements to acquire Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee) and Western Gas Resources, Inc. (Western). Anadarko expects to finance the acquisitions through a $24 billion, 364-day committed acquisition facility. See
Note 7.Anadarko agreed to acquire Kerr-McGee for $16.4 billion, or $70.50 per share, plus the assumption of debt and other liabilities estimated at $1.6 billion. The transaction, subject to the approval of Kerr-McGee shareholders, as well as other conditions including customary regulatory approvals, is expected to close in the third quarter of 2006.
The Company agreed to acquire Western for $4.7 billion, or $61.00 per share, plus the assumption of debt and other liabilities estimated at $600 million. Subject to the approval of Western's shareholders, as well as other conditions including customary regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2006.
In June 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to sell its Canadian oil and gas operations. Accordingly, the Canadian operations have been classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and cash flows and the assets and associated liabilities have been classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. The expected sale is part of a portfolio refocusing effort stemming from the agreements to acquire Kerr-McGee and Western. Proceeds from the divestiture will be used to retire debt. The following table summarizes the amounts included in income from discontinued operations for all periods presented:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ |
211 |
$ |
199 |
$ |
464 |
$ |
374 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ |
86 |
$ |
90 |
$ |
220 |
$ |
169 |
|||||||||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
66 |
(22) |
28 |
(38 |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ |
152 |
$ |
68 |
$ |
248 |
$ |
131 |
|||||||||||||||||
5. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market and removed at carrying value. The major classes of inventories, which are included in other current assets, are as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
millions |
||||||||||||||
Materials and supplies |
$ |
109 |
$ |
90 |
||||||||||
Natural gas |
9 |
18 |
||||||||||||
Crude oil and NGLs |
38 |
24 |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
156 |
$ |
132 |
||||||||||
The above table excludes $45 million and $49 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, of inventories which are included in Current Assets Held for Sale.
6. Properties and Equipment
Oil and gas properties include costs of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, which were excluded from capitalized costs being amortized. These amounts represent costs associated with unproved properties and major development projects in which the Company owns a direct interest. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company's investment in countries where proved reserves have not been established was $149 million and $107 million, respectively. For the first six months of 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded provisions for impairments of oil and gas properties of $18 million and zero, respectively, related to international activities.
Total interest cost incurred during the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 was $66 million and $67 million, respectively. Of these amounts, the Company capitalized $15 million and $16 million, respectively, during the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 as part of the cost of properties. Total interest cost incurred during the first six months of 2006 and 2005 was $132 million and $135 million, respectively. Of these amounts, the Company capitalized $28 million and $30 million during the first six months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The interest rates for capitalization are based on the Company's weighted-average cost of borrowings used to finance the expenditures applied to costs excluded on which exploration, development and construction activities are in progress.
Properties and equipment include internal costs related to exploration, development and construction activities of $39 million and $35 million capitalized during the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the first six months of 2006 and 2005, the Company capitalized internal costs related to exploration, development and construction activities of $79 million and $72 million, respectively.
June 30, 2006 |
December 31, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
millions |
Principal |
Carrying Value |
Principal |
Carrying Value |
||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ |
3,742 |
$ |
3,580 |
$ |
3,796 |
$ |
3,677 |
||||||||||
Less current debt |
211 |
80 |
||||||||||||||||
Less debt associated with assets held for sale |
8 |
50 |
||||||||||||||||
Total long-term debt |
$ |
3,361 |
$ |
3,547 |
||||||||||||||
During the first six months of 2006, the Company redeemed for cash $42 million principal amount of 7.375% Debentures due May 2006 and $30 million principal amount of Zero Yield Puttable Contingent Debt Securities due 2021. As of June 30, 2006, current debt represents $51 million principal amount of 7% Notes due October 2006, $142 million principal amount of 5.375% Notes due March 2007 and $18 million notes payable, banks.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a $24 billion, 364-day committed acquisition facility provided by UBS, Credit Suisse and Citigroup in order to finance the pending acquisitions.
Derivative Instruments The Company is exposed to price risk from changing commodity prices. Management believes it is prudent to periodically minimize the variability in cash flows on a portion of its oil and gas production. To meet this objective, the Company enters into various types of derivative financial instruments to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changing commodity prices. The Company also uses fixed price physical delivery sales contracts to accomplish this objective. The types of derivative financial instruments utilized by the Company include futures, swaps and options.
Anadarko also enters into derivative financial instruments (futures, swaps and options) and physical delivery contracts for trading purposes with the objective of generating profits from exposure to changes in the market price of natural gas and crude oil. Derivative financial instruments are also used to meet customers' pricing requirements while achieving a price structure consistent with the Company's overall pricing strategy. In addition, the Company may use options and swaps to manage exposure associated with interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Futures contracts are generally used to fix the price of expected future gas sales and oil sales at major industry trading locations; e.g., Henry Hub, Louisiana for gas and Cushing, Oklahoma for oil. Commodity swap agreements are generally used to fix or float the price of oil and gas at major trading locations. Basis swaps are used to fix or float the price differential between the price of gas at Henry Hub and various other market locations. Physical delivery purchase and sale agreements require the receipt or delivery of physical product at a specified location and price. The pricing can be fixed or market-based. Options are generally used to fix a floor and a ceiling price (collar) for expected future gas sales and oil sales. Interest rate swaps are used by the Company to fix or float the interest rates attributable to the Company's existing or forecasted debt issuances.
Settlements of futures contracts are guaranteed by the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) or the International Petroleum Exchange and have nominal credit risk. Over-the-counter traded swaps and options and physical delivery agreements expose the Company to credit risk to the extent the counterparty is unable to meet its settlement commitment. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of each counterparty and assesses the impact, if any, on fair valuation and hedge accounting criteria. In addition, the Company routinely exercises its contractual right to net realized gains against realized losses in settling with its swap and option counterparties.
Oil and Gas Activities At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had option contracts, swap contracts and fixed price physical delivery contracts in place to hedge the sales price of a portion of its expected future sales of equity oil and gas production (non-trading activities). The fixed price physical delivery contracts are excluded from derivative accounting treatment under the normal sale provision. The derivative financial instruments receive hedge accounting treatment if they qualify and are so designated. For those derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting, unrealized gains and losses are recognized currently in oil and gas revenues. The timing of the recognition of gains and losses in earnings associated with derivative instruments is dependent on whether hedge accounting is utilized and the effectiveness of the hedge. All realized and unrealized gains and losses related to derivative financial instruments that are undertaken to hedge the sales price of the Company's future sales of equity gas and oil production are recorded to gas sales and oil and condensate sales when recognized. See
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Derivative Instruments.The fair value and the accumulated other comprehensive income balance applicable to the derivative financial instruments (excluding the physical delivery sales contracts) are as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
millions |
||||||||
Fair Value - Asset (Liability) |
|
|||||||
Current |
$ |
(30 |
) |
$ |
(28 |
) |
||
Long-term |
(137 |
) |
(25 |
) |
||||
Total |
$ |
(167 |
) |
$ |
(53 |
) |
||
|
||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss before income taxes |
$ |
(134 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss after income taxes |
$ |
(84 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
The difference between the fair value and the unrealized loss before income taxes recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income is due to recognition of unrealized gains and losses on derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting and hedge ineffectiveness.
Below is a summary of the Company's financial derivative instruments and fixed price, physical delivery sales contracts related to its oil and gas activities (non-trading) as of June 30, 2006, including the hedged volumes per day and the related weighted-average prices. The natural gas prices are NYMEX Henry Hub. The crude oil prices are a combination of NYMEX Cushing and Brent Dated.
Remainder |
Average |
Hedge |
||||||||||||||||
of |
2010- |
Accounting |
||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2012 |
Applied |
|||||||||||||
Natural Gas |
||||||||||||||||||
Two-Way Collars (thousand MMBtu/d) |
10 |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
No |
||||||||||||
Price per MMBtu |
||||||||||||||||||
Ceiling sold price |
$ |
5.88 |
$ |
6.02 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Floor purchase price |
$ |
4.00 |
$ |
4.00 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Three-Way Collars (thousand MMBtu/d) |
- |
30 |
30 |
50 |
- |
Yes |
||||||||||||
Price per MMBtu |
||||||||||||||||||
Ceiling sold price |
$ |
- |
$ |
11.23 |
$ |
13.83 |
$ |
12.60 |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Floor purchased price |
$ |
- |
$ |
9.00 |
$ |
7.50 |
$ |
7.50 |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Floor sold price |
$ |
- |
$ |
6.00 |
$ |
5.00 |
$ |
5.00 |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Total (thousand MMBtu/d) |
10 |
36 |
30 |
50 |
- |
|||||||||||||
Basis Swaps (thousand MMBtu/d) |
12 |
35 |
30 |
20 |
- |
No |
||||||||||||
Price per MMBtu |
$ |
(.30 |
) |
$ |
(1.47 |
) |
$ |
(1.43 |
) |
$ |
(1.08 |
) |
$ |
- |
||||
Crude Oil |
||||||||||||||||||
Two-Way Collars (MBbls/d) |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
No |
||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
||||||||||||||||||
Ceiling sold price |
$ |
26.32 |
$ |
26.32 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Floor purchase price |
$ |
22.00 |
$ |
22.00 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||
Three-Way Collars (MBbls/d) |
- |
35 |
51 |
48 |
8 |
* |
||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
||||||||||||||||||
Ceiling sold price |
$ |
- |
$ |
86.16 |
$ |
87.20 |
$ |
87.04 |
$ |
87.04 |
||||||||
Floor purchased price |
$ |
- |
$ |
58.57 |
$ |
53.37 |
$ |
52.51 |
$ |
49.35 |
||||||||
Floor sold price |
$ |
- |
$ |
43.57 |
$ |
38.37 |
$ |
37.51 |
$ |
34.34 |
||||||||
Total (MBbls/d) |
1 |
36 |
51 |
48 |
8 |
|||||||||||||
MMBtu - million British thermal units |
||||||||||||||||||
MMBtu/d - million British thermal units per day |
||||||||||||||||||
MBbls/d - thousand barrels per day |
||||||||||||||||||
* Crude oil three-way collars that were subject to hedge accounting are as follows: 2007 - 32 MBbls/d, 2008 - 45 MBbls/d, 2009 - 45 MBbls/d, 2010 - 18 MBbls/d, 2011 - 3 MBbls/d and 2012 - 2 MBbls/d.
A two-way collar is a combination of options, a sold call and a purchased put. The sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) and the purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor) the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of options, a sold call, a purchased put and a sold put. The sold call establishes a maximum price the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. The purchased put establishes a minimum price unless the market price falls below the sold put, at which point the minimum price would be the reference price (i.e., NYMEX) plus the difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike price. The fixed price hedges consist of swaps and physical delivery contracts and establish a fixed price the Company will receive for the volumes under contract.
Marketing and Trading Activities Gains and losses attributed to the Company's marketing and trading derivative instruments (both physically and financially settled) are recognized currently in earnings. The marketing and trading gains and losses that are attributable to the Company's production are recorded to gas sales and oil and condensate sales. The marketing and trading gains and losses that are attributable to third-party production are recorded to other sales. The fair values of these derivatives as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are as follows:
June 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
millions |
||||||||||||||
Fair Value - Asset (Liability) |
|
|||||||||||||
Current |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
1 |
|||||||||
Long-term |
1 |
2 |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
3 |
|||||||||
Firm Transportation Keep-Whole Agreement Effective April 1, 2006, Anadarko and Duke Energy Corporation (Duke) terminated the keep-whole agreement and Duke transferred to Anadarko a portfolio of certain gas transportation agreements that had been subject to the keep-whole agreement on several U.S. and Canadian pipelines.
The Company recognized other expense of $9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and other expense of $4 million and $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to the keep-whole agreement and associated derivative instruments. Net payments to Duke for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $2 million and $2 million, respectively, and net (payments to) receipts from Duke for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $7 million and $(3) million, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, other current assets included $30 million and other long-term liabilities included $22 million related to the keep-whole agreement and associated derivative instruments.
Interest Rate Swap In March 2006, Anadarko entered into a 25-year swap agreement with a notional value of $600 million whereby the Company receives a fixed interest rate and pays a floating interest rate indexed to LIBOR. This agreement was entered into to better balance the fixed-rate to floating-rate percentage of the Company's debt obligations. The transaction qualifies for fair value hedge accounting. Realized gains and losses under the agreement are recorded to interest expense. The net unrealized gain (loss) related to fair value changes of the interest rate swap and hedged debt is also recorded to interest expense. The fair value of the interest rate swap is reflected within assets or liabilities and the related change in fair value of the hedged debt is reflected in the carrying value of the associated long-term debt. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $47 million on the fair value of the interest rate swap, which was offset by a reduction of $47 million on the carrying value of the hedged debt. Any difference between the changes in the fair value of the swap and the carrying value of hedged debt represents hedge ineffectiveness.
In June 2006, Anadarko entered into a three-month forward-looking 30-year swap agreement with a notional value of $1.5 billion and two three-month forward-looking 10-year swap agreements with a combined notional value of $1 billion whereby the Company pays a fixed interest rate and receives a floating interest rate indexed to LIBOR. These agreements were entered into to fix the interest rate on a portion of the debt the Company expects to issue during the third quarter of 2006. The transactions qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. The effective portion of the net unrealized gain (loss) related to the fair value changes of these interest rate swaps is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion is recognized in interest expense. The fair value of the interest rate swap is reflected within assets or liabilities. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $34 million, including ineffectiveness which was immaterial.
9. Preferred Stock
Anadarko repurchased $43 million of preferred stock during the first six months of 2006. For the first and second quarters of 2006 and 2005, dividends of $13.65 per share (equivalent to $1.365 per Depositary Share) were paid to holders of preferred stock.
In May 2006, the Company's shareholders approved a two-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend. The distribution date was May 26, 2006 to stockholders of record on May 12, 2006. In addition, the Company's Board of Directors approved the retirement of the Company's existing treasury stock prior to the stock split distribution date. The book value of the treasury shares was allocated to common stock, paid-in capital and retained earnings at the time of retirement. Except for the presentation of common shares authorized and issued on the consolidated balance sheet, all prior period share and per share information has been restated to reflect the stock split.
The reconciliation between basic and diluted EPS, from continuing operations, is as follows:
Three Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 |
June 30, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations |
$ |
663 |
$ |
439 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
1 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
available to common stockholders |
$ |
662 |
459 |
$ |
1.44 |
$ |
438 |
472 |
$ |
0.93 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
performance-based stock awards |
- |
4 |
- |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
available to common stockholders plus |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
plus assumed conversion |
$ |
662 |
463 |
$ |
1.43 |
$ |
438 |
477 |
$ |
0.92 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 |
June 30, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
Income |
Shares |
Per Share |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operations |
$ |
1,228 |
$ |
867 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
2 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
available to common stockholders |
$ |
1,226 |
460 |
$ |
2.67 |
$ |
865 |
473 |
$ |
1.83 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
performance-based stock awards |
- |
4 |
- |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
available to common stockholders plus |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
plus assumed conversion |
$ |
1,226 |
464 |
$ |
2.65 |
$ |
865 |
477 |
$ |
1.81 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, options for 0.9 million average shares of common stock were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The Company has a stock buyback program under which shares are repurchased either in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, Anadarko purchased 2.5 million shares of common stock for $118 million under the program. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, Anadarko purchased 5.2 million shares of common stock for $198 million.
The covenants in the Company's credit agreement provide for a maximum capitalization ratio of 60% debt, exclusive of the effect of any noncash writedowns. Retained earnings were not restricted as to the payment of dividends at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
11. Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Information
The difference between cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheet and statement of cash flows at June 30, 2006 is due to cash of $149 million, which is included in Current Assets Held for Sale. The amounts of cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized) and income taxes, including amounts related to discontinued operations, are as follows:
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||
Interest |
$ |
96 |
$ |
98 |
||||||
Income taxes |
$ |
209 |
$ |
144 |
12. Segment Information
The following table illustrates information related to continuing operations for Anadarko's business segments. The segment shown as All Other and Intercompany Eliminations includes other smaller operating units, corporate activities, financing activities and intercompany eliminations. Operating income (loss), shown in the table below, agrees to the consolidated statement of income where it reconciles to income before income taxes.
Oil and Gas |
Marketing |
All Other and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration |
and |
Intercompany |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
and Production |
Trading |
Minerals |
Eliminations |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
1,747 |
$ |
53 |
$ |
13 |
$ |
(4 |
) |
$ |
1,809 |
||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
$ |
5 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ |
1,049 |
$ |
(6 |
) |
$ |
12 |
$ |
(87 |
) |
$ |
968 |
|||||||||||||||||
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
1,335 |
$ |
43 |
$ |
11 |
$ |
5 |
$ |
1,394 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ |
834 |
$ |
(3 |
) |
$ |
9 |
$ |
(83 |
) |
$ |
757 |
|||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
3,379 |
$ |
92 |
$ |
33 |
$ |
6 |
$ |
3,510 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
$ |
18 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
18 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ |
2,078 |
$ |
(18 |
) |
$ |
31 |
$ |
(157 |
) |
$ |
1,934 |
|||||||||||||||||
Net properties and equipment |
$ |
14,257 |
$ |
463 |
$ |
1,186 |
$ |
327 |
$ |
16,233 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ |
1,092 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
1,092 |
|||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
2,655 |
$ |
83 |
$ |
25 |
$ |
(18 |
) |
$ |
2,745 |
||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ |
1,667 |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
22 |
$ |
(190 |
) |
$ |
1,497 |
|||||||||||||||||
Net properties and equipment |
$ |
12,314 |
$ |
368 |
$ |
1,190 |
$ |
306 |
$ |
14,178 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ |
1,192 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
1,192 |
|||||||||||||||||||
13. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and supplemental pension plans that are noncontributory and a foreign contributory defined benefit pension plan. The Company also provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Health care benefits are funded by contributions from the Company and the retiree, with the retiree contributions adjusted according to the provisions of the Company's health care plans. The Company's retiree life insurance plan is noncontributory. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the majority of its plans.
The following activities and balances include amounts associated with discontinued operations.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company made contributions of $58 million to its funded pension plans, $7 million to its unfunded pension plans and $4 million to its unfunded other postretirement benefit plans. Contributions to the funded plans increase the plan assets while contributions to unfunded plans are used for current benefit payments. During the remainder of 2006, the Company expects to contribute about $3 million to its funded pension plans, $3 million to its unfunded pension plans and $3 million to its unfunded other postretirement benefit plans.
The following table sets forth the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit cost.
|
Pension Benefits |
Other Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ |
10 |
$ |
9 |
$ |
4 |
$ |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
10 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return (loss) on plan assets |
(12 |
) |
(9 |
) |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses and prior service cost |
5 |
4 |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ |
13 |
$ |
14 |
$ |
7 |
$ |
6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pension Benefits |
Other Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ |
20 |
$ |
18 |
$ |
8 |
$ |
7 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
21 |
19 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return (loss) on plan assets |
(24 |
) |
(18 |
) |
- |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses and prior service cost |
10 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ |
27 |
$ |
28 |
$ |
14 |
$ |
13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
General Litigation charges and adjustments of $10 million and $3 million were expensed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Litigation charges of zero and $27 million were expensed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and is involved in governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, royalty claims, contract claims and environmental claims. The Company has also been named as a defendant in various personal injury claims, including claims by employees of third-party contractors alleging exposure to asbestos, silica and benzene while working at refineries located in Texas, California and Oklahoma. Two companies Anadarko acquired in 2000 and 2002 sold the refineries prior to being acquired by Anadarko. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow of the Company.
Litigation The Company is subject to various claims from its royalty owners in the regular course of business as an oil and gas producer, including disputes regarding measurement, costs and expenses beyond the wellhead and basis for royalty valuations. Among such claims, the Company was named as a defendant in a case styled U.S. of America ex rel. Harold E. Wright v. AGIP Company, et al. (the ''Gas Qui Tam case'') filed in September 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. This lawsuit generally alleges that the Company and 118 other defendants undervalued natural gas in connection with a payment of royalties on production from federal and Indian lands. Based on the Company's present understanding of these various governmental and False Claims Act proceedings, the Company believes that it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously assert such defenses. However, if the Company is found to have violated the Civil False Claims Act, the Company could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including treble damages and substantial monetary fines. All defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds based on Mr. Wright's failure to qualify as the original source of the information underlying his fraud claims, and the Company filed additional motions to dismiss on separate grounds. On September 14, 2005, the trial court declined an early appeal of its order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss. Meanwhile, the discovery process is ongoing and the court has set a trial date for fall 2007. Management is currently unable to determine a reasonably possible range of loss, if any, related to this matter.
Other The Company is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of Anadarko, the liability with respect to these actions will not have a material effect on the Company.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company has made in this report, and may from time to time otherwise make in other public filings, press releases and discussions with Company management, forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 concerning the Company's operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward looking statements include information concerning future production and reserves, schedules, plans, timing of development, contributions from oil and gas properties, and those statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "estimates," "projects," "target," "goal," "plans," "objective," "should" or similar expressions or variations on such expressions. For such statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations include, but are not limited to, the Company's assumptions about energy markets, production levels, reserve levels, operating results, competitive conditions, technology, the availability of capital resources, capital expenditures and other contractual obligations, the supply and demand for oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and other products or services, the price of oil, natural gas, NGLs and other products or services, implementation of plans concerning the Bear Head liquefied natural gas facility, currency exchange rates, the weather, inflation, the availability of goods and services, drilling risks, future processing volumes and pipeline throughput, general economic conditions, either internationally or nationally or in the jurisdictions in which the Company or its subsidiaries are doing business, legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in environmental regulation, environmental risks and liability under federal, state and foreign environmental laws and regulations, the securities or capital markets, the ability to successfully integrate the operations of the Company, Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee) and Western Gas Resources, Inc. (Western), our ability to repay the debt issued for the acquisition of Kerr-McGee and Western and other factors discussed in "Risk Factors" and in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K and "Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q. Anadarko undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements.
Overview
General Anadarko Petroleum Corporation's primary line of business is the exploration, development, production and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The Company's major areas of operations are located in the United States and Algeria. The Company is also active in Venezuela, Qatar and several other countries. The Company's focus is on adding high-margin oil and natural gas reserves at competitive costs and continuing to develop more efficient and effective ways of exploring for and producing oil and gas. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "Anadarko" or "Company" refer to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries.
In June 2006, Anadarko announced it agreed to acquire Kerr-McGee and Western in separate all-cash transactions totaling $21.1 billion, plus the assumption of debt estimated at $2.2 billion. Anadarko expects to finance the acquisitions through a $24 billion, 364-day committed acquisition facility. Both transactions are expected to close in the third quarter of 2006. Also in June 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to sell its Canadian oil and gas operations. Unless noted otherwise, the following information relates to continuing operations and excludes the discontinued Canadian operations, which are classified as held for sale. See Acquisitions and Divestitures and Discontinued Operations for additional information.
Results of Continuing Operations - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Selected Data |
|||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Financial Results |
|||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ |
1,809 |
$ |
1,394 |
$ |
3,510 |
$ |
2,745 |
|||||||||
Costs and expenses |
841 |
637 |
1,576 |
1,248 |
|||||||||||||
Interest expense and other (income) expense |
44 |
58 |
97 |
110 |
|||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
261 |
260 |
609 |
520 |
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ |
663 |
$ |
439 |
$ |
1,228 |
$ |
867 |
|||||||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations - diluted |
$ |
1.43 |
$ |
0.92 |
$ |
2.65 |
$ |
1.81 |
|||||||||
Average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
463 |
477 |
464 |
477 |
|||||||||||||
Operating Results |
|||||||||||||||||
Sales volumes (MMBOE) |
36 |
34 |
68 |
70 |
|||||||||||||
Capital Resources and Liquidity |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
$ |
1,849 |
$ |
1,559 |
|||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ |
1,686 |
$ |
1,291 |
|||||||||||||
MMBOE - million barrels of oil equivalent |
In May 2006, the Company's shareholders approved a two-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend. The distribution date was May 26, 2006 to stockholders of record on May 12, 2006. All prior period share and per share information presented on the following pages has been restated to reflect the stock split.
Financial Results - Continuing Operations
Net Income In the second quarter of 2006, Anadarko's net income from continuing operations was $663 million or $1.43 per share (diluted). This compares to net income from continuing operations of $439 million or $0.92 per share (diluted) for the second quarter of 2005. The increases in net income and earnings per share were primarily due to higher realized crude oil and NGLs prices, higher oil sales volumes and a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by higher costs and expenses and lower natural gas sales volumes.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, Anadarko's net income from continuing operations was $1.23 billion or $2.65 per share (diluted). This compares to net income from continuing operations of $867 million or $1.81 per share (diluted) for the same period in 2005. The increase in net income was primarily due to higher net realized commodity prices and a decrease in income tax expense, partially offset by higher costs and expenses and lower sales volumes. Earnings per share were favorably impacted due to lower average shares outstanding in 2006 as a result of stock repurchases in 2005 and 2006.
Revenues |
|||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ |
627 |
$ |
659 |
$ |
1,371 |
$ |
1,260 |
|||||||||
Oil and condensate sales |
1,007 |
601 |
1,808 |
|
1,241 |
||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales |
138 |
104 |
245 |
|
206 |
||||||||||||
Other sales |
37 |
30 |
86 |
|
38 |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
1,809 |
$ |
1,394 |
$ |
3,510 |
$ |
2,745 |
|||||||||
Anadarko's total revenues for the second quarter of 2006 increased 30% compared to the same period of 2005 due to higher realized oil and NGLs prices and higher oil sales volumes, partially offset by the lower natural gas volumes. Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 28% compared to the same periods of 2005, primarily due to higher net commodity prices, partially offset by lower gas volumes.
The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk of a decrease in the market prices for its anticipated sales of natural gas, crude oil and condensate and NGLs. This activity is referred to as price risk management. The impact of price risk management and marketing activities related to continuing operations increased total gas, oil and condensate and NGLs revenues $20 million during the second quarter of 2006 compared to an increase of $4 million in the same period of 2005. For the second quarter of 2006, these activities resulted in $0.34 per Mcf higher average natural gas prices and $1.15 per barrel lower average oil prices compared to market prices. For the second quarter of 2005, these activities resulted in $0.24 per Mcf higher average natural gas prices and $1.72 per barrel lower average oil prices compared to market prices.
The impact of price risk management and marketing activities increased total gas, oil and condensate and NGLs revenues $43 million for the first six months of 2006, compared to a decrease of $18 million in the same period of 2005. For the first six months of 2006, these activities resulted in $0.29 per Mcf higher average natural gas prices and $0.70 per barrel lower average oil prices compared to market prices. For the first six months of 2005, these activities resulted in $0.18 per Mcf higher average natural gas prices and $2.12 per barrel lower average oil prices compared to market prices.
Analysis of Sales Volumes |
|||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||||||
Barrels of Oil Equivalent (MMBOE) |
|||||||||||||||||||
United States |
27 |
27 |
53 |
54 |
|||||||||||||||
Algeria |
7 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
|||||||||||||||
Other International |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|||||||||||||||
Total |
36 |
34 |
68 |
70 |
|||||||||||||||
Barrels of Oil Equivalent per Day (MBOE/d) |
|||||||||||||||||||
United States |
304 |
295 |
293 |
298 |
|||||||||||||||
Algeria |
71 |
57 |
67 |
67 |
|||||||||||||||
Other International |
17 |
20 |
18 |
21 |
|||||||||||||||
Total |
392 |
372 |
378 |
386 |
|||||||||||||||
MBOE/d - thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day |
Anadarko's daily sales volumes increased 5% for the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005 primarily due to higher sales volumes in Algeria related to the timing of cargo liftings and due to additional wells being tied in and put into production in the Gulf of Mexico, partially offset by lower oil sales volumes in Venezuela as a result of contract changes. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, Anadarko's daily sales volumes decreased 2% compared to the same period of 2005 primarily due to lower onshore United States gas volumes as a result of an increased focus on exploration drilling and lower oil sales volumes in Venezuela, partially offset by higher oil sales volumes from the Gulf of Mexico.
Natural Gas Sales Volumes and Average Prices |
|||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||||||
United States (Bcf) |
99 |
104 |
197 |
210 |
|||||||||||||||
MMcf/d |
1,091 |
1,147 |
1,091 |
1,165 |
|||||||||||||||
Price per Mcf |
$ |
6.31 |
$ |
6.32 |
$ |
6.94 |
$ |
5.98 |
|||||||||||
Bcf - billion cubic feet |
|||||||||||||||||||
MMcf/d - million cubic feet per day |
The Company's daily natural gas sales volumes for the second quarter of 2006 were down 5% compared to the second quarter of 2005. For the first six months of 2006, the Company's daily natural gas sales volumes were down 6% compared to the same period in 2005. The decreases were primarily due to natural declines and a partial shift in focus toward exploration drilling versus the development of existing fields, primarily in east Texas and north Louisiana. While continued development drilling is planned to maintain steady production at the more mature Bossier and Vernon fields, the Company chose to shift some of the resources away from development of those fields in order to test step-out and new field prospects in 2005. While exploration efforts will continue in 2006, many of the new rigs being added in 2006 will be utilized for development drilling. Production of natural gas is generally not directly affected by seasonal swings in demand.
Anadarko's average realized natural gas price for the second quarter of 2006 was relatively flat with the same period of 2005. The Company's average natural gas price for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 16% compared to the same period in 2005. The higher year-to-date prices in 2006 are attributed to continued strong demand in North America and the impact of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico during 2005 on gas production and infrastructure. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has utilized price risk management on only 1% of its anticipated natural gas wellhead sales volumes for 2006. See Marketing Strategies under Item 2 and Energy Price Risk under Item 3 of this Form 10-Q.
Crude Oil and Condensate Sales Volumes and Average Prices |
||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
|||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||
United States (MMBbls) |
7 |
5 |
14 |
12 |
||||||||||||||
MBbls/d |
84 |
65 |
77 |
67 |
||||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
$ |
61.81 |
$ |
44.32 |
$ |
59.71 |
$ |
41.20 |
||||||||||
Algeria (MMBbls) |
7 |
5 |
12 |
12 |
||||||||||||||
MBbls/d |
71 |
57 |
67 |
67 |
||||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
$ |
70.54 |
$ |
51.75 |
$ |
67.12 |
$ |
49.81 |
||||||||||
Other International (MMBbls) |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||||||||||
MBbls/d |
17 |
20 |
18 |
21 |
||||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
$ |
53.47 |
$ |
40.03 |
$ |
50.59 |
$ |
35.40 |
||||||||||
Total (MMBbls) |
16 |
12 |
29 |
28 |
||||||||||||||
MBbls/d |
172 |
142 |
162 |
155 |
||||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
$ |
64.61 |
$ |
46.71 |
$ |
61.73 |
$ |
44.10 |
||||||||||
MMBbls - million barrels |
||||||||||||||||||
MBbls/d - thousand barrels per day |
Anadarko's daily crude oil and condensate sales volumes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 were up 21% and 5%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2005. The increase for the second quarter of 2006 is primarily due to additional wells being tied in and put into production in the Gulf of Mexico and higher sales volumes in Algeria related to the timing of cargo liftings. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, volumes in the United States also increased as a result of operations in the Gulf of Mexico. The increases for both periods were partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes from Venezuela due to recent contract changes. Production of oil usually is not affected by seasonal swings in demand.
Anadarko's average crude oil price for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 38% and 40%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2005. These higher crude oil prices in 2006 were attributed to continued political unrest in oil exporting countries, increased worldwide demand and the impact of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico during 2005 on oil production and infrastructure. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has utilized price risk management on less than 1% of its anticipated oil and condensate sales volumes for 2006. See
Energy Price Risk under Item 3 of this Form 10-Q.
Natural Gas Liquids Sales Volumes and Average Prices |
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
|||||||||||||||
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Total (MMBbls) |
4 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
||||||||||||
MBbls/d |
38 |
39 |
35 |
37 |
||||||||||||
Price per barrel |
$ |
39.66 |
$ |
29.65 |
$ |
39.32 |
$ |
31.02 |
The Company's daily NGLs sales volumes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, decreased 3% and 5%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2005. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the average NGLs price increased 34% and 27%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2005. NGLs production is dependent on natural gas and NGLs prices as well as the economics of processing the natural gas to extract NGLs.
Costs and Expenses |
|||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Direct operating |
$ |
150 |
$ |
106 |
$ |
284 |
$ |
213 |
|||||||||
Transportation and cost of product |
100 |
66 |
183 |
128 |
|||||||||||||
General and administrative |
123 |
98 |
228 |
188 |
|||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
362 |
277 |
655 |
548 |
|||||||||||||
Other taxes |
101 |
90 |
208 |
171 |
|||||||||||||
Impairments |
5 |
- |
18 |
- |
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
841 |
$ |
637 |
$ |
1,576 |
$ |
1,248 |
|||||||||
During the second quarter of 2006, Anadarko's costs and expenses increased 32% compared to the second quarter of 2005 due to the following factors:
- |
Direct operating expense was up 42% due to an increase in maintenance and repair activity, as well as rising utility and fuel expenses as a result of higher energy costs and industry demand for services and materials. |
- |
Transportation and cost of product expense increased 52% primarily due to increases in transportation and NGLs processing expense. The increase was primarily due to the Company transporting a higher percentage of its natural gas volumes in order to reach higher priced markets. Several of these transportation contracts were assumed from Duke when the keep-whole agreement was terminated. |
- |
General and administrative (G&A) expense increased 26% primarily due to higher compensation and benefits expenses attributed primarily to the rising cost of attracting and retaining a highly qualified workforce. G&A expense for the second quarter of 2006 also included about $10 million related to expensing costs associated with international projects that will not be pursued. |
- |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense increased 31%. DD&A expense includes an increase of $42 million associated with the impact of higher expected future development costs, $26 million primarily due to higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool) and an increase of $14 million related to higher production volumes. |
- |
Other taxes increased 12% primarily due to higher net realized commodity prices. |
- |
Impairments in the second quarter of 2006 were related to other international oil and gas activities. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, Anadarko's costs and expenses increased 26% compared to the same period of 2005 due to the following factors:
- |
Direct operating expense was up 33% due to an increase in workovers in the Gulf of Mexico, and an increase in maintenance and repair activity, as well as rising utility and fuel expenses as a result of higher energy costs and industry demand. |
- |
Transportation and cost of product expense increased 43% primarily due to higher transportation and NGLs processing expense. |
- |
G&A expense increased 21% primarily due to higher compensation and benefits attributed primarily to the rising cost of attracting and retaining a highly qualified workforce. G&A expense during 2006 also included about $10 million related to expensing costs associated with international projects that will not be pursued. |
- |
DD&A expense increased 20%. DD&A expense includes an increase of $70 million primarily due to higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool) and $42 million associated with the impact of higher expected future development costs. |
- |
Other taxes increased 22% primarily due to higher net realized commodity prices. |
- |
Impairments in the first six months of 2006 were related to other international oil and gas activities. |
Interest Expense and Other (Income) Expense
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross interest expense |
$ |
66 |
$ |
67 |
$ |
132 |
$ |
135 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(15 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(30 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
51 |
51 |
104 |
105 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (Income) Expense |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
(6 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(5 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Firm transportation keep-whole contract valuation |
- |
9 |
4 |
12 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
- |
2 |
1 |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other (income) expense |
(7 |
) |
7 |
(7 |
) |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
44 |
$ |
58 |
$ |
97 |
$ |
110 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense
For additional information see Acquisitions and Divestitures and Debt below and Interest Rate Risk under Item 3 of this Form 10-Q.
Income Tax Expense |
|||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
||||||||||||||||
millions except percentages |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ |
261 |
$ |
260 |
$ |
609 |
$ |
520 |
|||||||||
Effective tax rate |
28 |
% |
37 |
% |
33 |
% |
37 |
% |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, income tax expense related to continuing operations increased 0% and 17% compared to the same periods of 2005 primarily due to fluctuations in income before income taxes, partially offset by a decrease in state income taxes due to enacted Texas legislation. See
Other Developments. Variances from the 35% statutory rate are caused by income taxes related to foreign activities, state income taxes including a reduction in the second quarter 2006 resulting from enacted Texas legislation, excess U.S. foreign tax credits and other items.Operating Results
Acquisitions and Divestitures In June 2006, Anadarko announced it agreed to acquire Kerr-McGee and Western in separate all-cash transactions. Anadarko intends to finance the acquisitions through a $24 billion, 364-day committed acquisition facility provided by UBS, Credit Suisse and Citigroup and subsequently syndicated to a group of major banks. Pricing of the acquisition facility is expected to be moderately lower than the Company's existing credit agreement and the covenants less restrictive than those included in the existing credit agreement. Anadarko plans to repay the acquisition facility with proceeds from asset sales, free cash flow from operations and the issuance of equity, debt and bank financing during the term of the facility. Anadarko intends to reduce leverage significantly over the 18 to 24 months following closing of the acquisitions.
Summary of the Kerr-McGee Corporation Transaction Anadarko has agreed to acquire Kerr-McGee for $16.4 billion, or $70.50 per share, plus the assumption of debt and other liabilities estimated at $1.6 billion. Kerr-McGee's year-end 2005 proved reserves, excluding pending Gulf of Mexico shelf divestitures, totaled 898 MMBOE, of which approximately 62% is natural gas. Proved undeveloped reserves represented 30% of the total. Production in 2006 is expected to be about 92 MMBOE, with natural gas representing approximately 60% of the total.
Kerr-McGee's core properties are located in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and onshore in Colorado and Utah. They include deepwater Gulf of Mexico blocks which are supported by Kerr-McGee's "hub-and-spoke" infrastructure. In Colorado, Kerr-McGee holds acreage in the Wattenberg natural gas play, located largely on Anadarko's Land Grant holdings, where Anadarko owns the royalty interest. In Utah, Kerr-McGee holds acreage in the Uinta basin's prolific Greater Natural Buttes gas play. In addition to its U.S. portfolio, Kerr-McGee produces oil and is continuing to develop and explore offshore China, has made discoveries and is pursuing the development of fields on the North Slope of Alaska and offshore Brazil, and is exploring offshore Australia, West Africa and the islands of Trinidad and Tobago.
Anadarko's and Kerr-McGee's Boards of Directors have unanimously approved the terms of the agreement, and Kerr-McGee's Board has recommended that its shareholders approve the transaction. Subject to the approval of Kerr-McGee shareholders at a meeting set for August 10, 2006, as well as other conditions including customary regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2006.
Summary of the Western Transaction Anadarko has agreed to acquire Western for $4.7 billion, or $61.00 per share, plus the assumption of debt and other liabilities estimated at $600 million. Western's year-end 2005 proved reserves totaled 153 MMBOE, with proved undeveloped reserves representing 57% of the total, while 2006 production is expected to total about 12.5 MMBOE. Essentially all of the reserves and production are natural gas.
Western's coalbed methane properties within the Powder River basin are directly adjacent to Anadarko's assets in this developing play. Anadarko expects that combining its properties with Western's will accelerate the development of these natural gas resources and produce volume growth through the end of the decade, and possibly longer, with more than 12,000 identified drilling locations in inventory.
Anadarko's and Western's Boards of Directors have unanimously approved the terms of the agreement, and Western's Board has recommended that its shareholders approve the transaction. Concurrent with the execution of the Western merger agreement, the Company entered into a voting agreement representing approximately 17% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Western common stock, which granted Anadarko a proxy to vote their shares at any stockholder meeting convened to consider the Western merger. Subject to the approval of Western's shareholders at a meeting set for August 23, 2006, as well as other conditions including customary regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2006.
Divestitures In June 2006, Anadarko announced its intent to sell its wholly owned subsidiary, Anadarko Canada Corporation. The expected sale is part of a portfolio refocusing effort stemming from the agreements to acquire Kerr-McGee and Western. Proceeds from the divestiture will be used to retire debt. See
Discontinued Operations.In July 2006, the Company announced that it had signed an agreement to sell Bear Head LNG Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary. Anadarko will receive $125 million, as well as an 18 month option to secure up to 350 MMcf/d of throughput capacity at competitive rates. The option period begins once the transaction closes, which is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2006. The expected sale is part of a portfolio refocusing effort stemming from the agreements to acquire Kerr-McGee and Western. Proceeds from the divestiture will be used to retire debt.
Exploration and Development Activities Excluding discontinued operations, Anadarko participated in a total of 198 wells, including 144 gas wells, 52 oil wells and 2 dry holes during the second quarter of 2006. This compares to a total of 154 wells, including 120 gas wells and 34 oil wells during the second quarter of 2005.
For the first six months of 2006, Anadarko participated in a total of 339 wells, including 256 gas wells, 78 oil wells and 5 dry holes. This compares to a total of 352 wells, including 272 gas wells, 76 oil wells and 4 dry holes during the first six months of 2005.
The Company's marketing department manages sales of its natural gas, crude oil and NGLs. In marketing its production, the Company attempts to maximize realized prices while managing credit exposure. The Company's sales of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs are generally made at the market prices of those products at the time of sale.
The Company also purchases natural gas, crude oil and NGLs volumes for resale primarily from partners and producers near Anadarko's production. These purchases allow the Company to aggregate larger volumes, attract larger, more creditworthy customers and facilitate its efforts to maximize prices received for the Company's production.
In an effort to protect the Company from commodity price risk stemming from the anticipated acquisitions of Kerr-McGee and Western, a strategy has been developed to have hedged the Company's current forecasted production up to the equivalent of 75% of the acquired portfolio through 2008. The strategy employs the use of three-way collars, along with certain other derivatives, intended to help ensure a return on investment while maintaining upside potential that could result from higher commodity prices.
The Company may also engage in trading activities for the purpose of generating profits from exposure to changes in market prices of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs. However, the Company does not engage in market-making practices nor does it trade in any non-energy-related commodities. The Company's trading risk position, typically, is a net short position that is offset by the Company's natural long position as a producer. See
Energy Price Risk under Item 3 of this Form 10-Q.Capital Resources and Liquidity
Overview Anadarko's primary source of cash during the first six months of 2006 was cash flow from operating activities. The Company used cash flow primarily to fund its capital spending program, repurchase Anadarko common stock, pay dividends and retire debt as well as preferred stock. The Company funded its capital investment programs during the first six months of 2006 primarily through cash flow from operating activities.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities Anadarko's cash flow from continuing operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $1.85 billion compared to $1.56 billion for the same period of 2005. The increase in cash flow was attributed to higher commodity prices, partially offset by higher costs and expenses and lower sales volumes.
Fluctuations in commodity prices have been the primary reason for the Company's short-term changes in cash flow from operating activities. Anadarko holds derivative instruments to help manage commodity price risk. Sales volume changes can also impact cash flow in the short-term, but have not been as volatile as commodity prices in prior years. Anadarko's long-term cash flow from operating activities is dependent on commodity prices, reserve replacement and the level of costs and expenses required for continuing operations.
Capital Expenditures The following table shows the Company's capital expenditures relating to continuing operations, by category.
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||
June 30 |
||||||||||
millions |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||
Development |
$ |
1,106 |
$ |
855 |
||||||
Exploration |
204 |
223 |
||||||||
Property acquisition |
||||||||||
Development - proved |
- |
28 |
||||||||
Exploration - unproved |
176 |
47 |
||||||||
Capitalized interest and internal costs related to exploration |
||||||||||
and development activities |
100 |
97 |
||||||||
Total oil and gas |
1,586 |
1,250 |
||||||||
Gathering and other |
100 |
41 |
||||||||
Total* |
$ |
1,686 |
$ |
1,291 |
||||||
* Includes actual asset retirement expenditures of $7 million and $6 million, respectively. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, Anadarko's capital spending increased 31% compared to the same period of 2005 primarily due to an increase in exploration lease acquisitions, offshore drilling completions, development of the coalbed methane infrastructure and rising service and material costs. The variances in the mix of oil and gas spending reflect the Company's available opportunities based on the near-term ranking of projects by net asset value potential.
Common Stock Repurchase Plan A $1 billion stock buyback program was authorized in November 2005. Shares may be repurchased either in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the first six months of 2006, Anadarko purchased 2.5 million shares of common stock for $118 million under the program. The repurchase program does not obligate Anadarko to acquire any specific number of shares and may be discontinued at any time. At June 30, 2006, $636 million remained available for stock repurchases under the program.
Dividends In the first six months of 2006 and 2005, Anadarko paid $83 million and $86 million, respectively, in dividends to its common stockholders (nine cents per share in the first and second quarters of both 2006 and 2005). Anadarko has paid a dividend to its common stockholders continuously since becoming an independent company in 1986. During each of the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, Anadarko also paid $2 million in preferred stock dividends.
The covenants in the Company's credit agreement provide for a maximum capitalization ratio of 60% debt, exclusive of the effect of any noncash writedowns. As of June 30, 2006, Anadarko's capitalization ratio was 22% debt; therefore, retained earnings were not restricted as to the payment of dividends. The Company intends to amend the credit agreement prior to closing the acquisitions to allow for a higher maximum capitalization ratio covenant such that it may close the acquisitions using the $24 billion acquisition facility and ensure that retained earnings are not restricted as to the payment of dividends.
Debt As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Anadarko's total debt, including amounts related to discontinued operations, was $3.6 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively. During the first six months of 2006, the Company redeemed for cash $42 million principal amount of 7.375% Debentures due May 2006 and $30 million principal amount of Zero Yield Puttable Contingent Debt Securities due 2021.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a $24 billion, 364-day committed acquisition facility provided by UBS, Credit Suisse and Citigroup and subsequently syndicated to a group of major banks in order to finance the acquisitions.
Preferred Stock Anadarko repurchased $43 million of preferred stock during the first six months of 2006.
Outlook The Company currently expects 2006 capital spending to be approximately $4 billion, not including the aforementioned acquisitions. Capital spending will be reviewed upon the completion of the acquisitions and divestitures in order to meet the Company's operating strategy. With the acquisitions, Anadarko believes that its expected level of cashflow and adherence to its capital discipline strategy will be more than sufficient to fund the Company's projected operational program.
This strategy is accomplished by setting capital activity at levels that are self-funding. When prices exceed targeted levels, as is currently the case, costs tend to increase as well. The cash generated in excess of the amount needed to fund the steady level of capital activity is: used to build balance sheet strength through debt reductions; systematically returned to shareholders through stock repurchases; or otherwise made available for reinvestment in other strategic options.
In June 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to sell its Canadian oil and gas operations. Accordingly, the Canadian operations have been classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and cash flows and the associated assets and liabilities have been classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2006, operations in Canada represented approximately 16% of Anadarko's total assets and 13% of year-to-date 2006 sales volumes. The following table summarizes selected data pertaining to discontinued operations.
Discontinued Operations |
Three Months Ended |
Six Months Ended |
||||||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
|||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts |
2006 |
2005 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ |
211 |
$ |
199 |
$ |
464 |
$ |
374 |
||||||||
Costs and expenses |
131 |
110 |
254 |
210 |
||||||||||||
Interest expense and other (income) expense |
(6 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(5 |
) |
||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(66 |
) |
22 |
(28 |
) |
38 |
||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ |
152 |
$ |
68 |
$ |
248 |
$ |
131 |
||||||||
Earnings per share from discontinued operations - diluted |
$ |
0.33 |
$ |
0.14 |
$ |
0.53 |
$ |
0.28 |
||||||||
Sales volumes (MMBOE) |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
$ |
330 |
$ |
172 |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ |
343 |
$ |
262 |
Income from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 increased 124% and 89%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2005 primarily due to a decrease in Canadian tax rates and higher commodity prices, partially offset by rising costs and expenses. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 includes a $79 million decrease related to Canadian tax rate changes.
Obligations and Commitments
Marketing Activities Effective April 1, 2006, Anadarko and Duke terminated the keep-whole agreement and Duke transferred to Anadarko a portfolio of certain gas transportation agreements that had been subject to the keep-whole agreement on several U.S. and Canadian pipelines. The gas transportation agreements extend through 2009 and represent an aggregate commitment of approximately $70 million.
Marketing and Trading Contracts The following tables provide additional information as of June 30, 2006 regarding the Company's marketing and trading portfolio of physical delivery and financially settled derivative instruments and the firm transportation keep-whole agreement and related financial derivative instruments.
|
Marketing |
Firm |
Total |
|||||||||||||
millions |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of |
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2005 - assets (liabilities) |
$ |
3 |
$ |
8 |
$ |
11 |
||||||||||
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during 2006 |
(2 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(11 |
) |
||||||||||
Fair value of new contracts when entered into during 2006 |
2 |
- |
2 |
|||||||||||||
Other changes in fair value |
(4 |
) |
1 |
(3 |
) |
|||||||||||
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of |
||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 - assets (liabilities) |
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
- |
$ |
(1 |
) |
||||||||
|
Fair Value of Contracts as of June 30, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
Assets (Liabilities) |
Maturity less than |
Maturity |
Maturity |
Maturity |
|
||||||||||||||
Marketing and Trading |
|||||||||||||||||||
Prices actively quoted |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
1 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
(1 |
) |
|||||||
Recent Accounting Developments
In March 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Exposure Draft on accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement benefit plans. If adopted as proposed, the Company would be required to recognize the entire overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit plans. The previously unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs would be required to be recognized on the balance sheet and in other comprehensive income (net of tax). The Company is currently awaiting issuance of a final statement from the FASB. At December 31, 2005, the Company's unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans was $320 million and $48 million, respectively, before income taxes.
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109", was issued in 2006 and will be effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of uncertain tax return positions in the financial statements. The Company cannot reasonably determine the impact of FIN 48 on its financial statements at this time.
Venezuela Anadarko's operations in Venezuela have been governed by an Operating Service Agreement (OSA) that was entered into in November 1993 with an affiliate of Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA), the national oil company of Venezuela. Anadarko and its partner in the OSA, Petrobras Energia Venezuela (Petrobras), have conducted their OSA operations via a Venezuelan joint venture in which Petrobras acts as operator. In 2005, the Venezuelan Ministry of Energy and Petroleum announced that all OSAs concluded by PDVSA between 1992 and 1997 were subject to renegotiation. On March 31, 2006, Anadarko executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Corporación Venezolana del Petróleo, S.A. (CVP), an affiliate of PDVSA, PDVSA and Petrobras, under which the parties agreed to convert the OSA to a company in which CVP and PDVSA will have a 60% interest, Petrobras will have a 22% interest, and Anadarko will have an 18% interest. The final contracts covered by the MOU have been approved by Venezuela's National Assembly. Anadarko expects to execute the contracts during the third quarter of 2006 at which time the OSA will be terminated and the new company will be formed.
In the first quarter of 2006, Anadarko paid approximately $6 million of Venezuela tax related to an assessment by SENIAT, the Venezuela national tax authority, which included an increase in corporate income tax rates (67.7% for 2001 and 50% for 2002-2004). In the second quarter of 2006, Anadarko paid approximately $4 million of interest and penalties related to SENIAT's tax assessment.
Anadarko is unable to predict the effect that any political events may have on its operations or interests in Venezuela for 2006 and beyond. Anadarko is currently analyzing its options, including the possible sale of these non-operated interests in Venezuela. Depending on what the Company decides to do with these assets going forward, Anadarko may be required to record a partial impairment of these assets in the near future, but cannot currently predict what a possible loss, if any, may be. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, approximately 2% of Anadarko's income from continuing operations before income taxes and total assets were associated with operations located in Venezuela.
Algeria Anadarko's operations in Algeria have been governed by an Agreement for Exploration and Exploitation of Liquid Hydrocarbons (herein referred to as the PSC) that Anadarko Algeria Corporation entered into in October 1989 with Sonatrach, the national oil company of Algeria. In March 2006, Anadarko received from Sonatrach a letter purporting to give notice under the PSC that enactment of a new law relating to hydrocarbons triggered Sonatrach's right under the PSC to renegotiate the PSC in order to re-establish the equilibrium of Anadarko's and Sonatrach's interests. Anadarko and Sonatrach reached an impasse over whether Sonatrach has a right to renegotiate the PSC based on this new law and have entered into a formal non-binding conciliation process under the terms of the PSC to try to resolve this dispute. At this time, Anadarko is unable to reasonably estimate what the economic impact under the PSC might be if Sonatrach is successful in modifying the PSC.
State Income Taxes Texas House Bill 3, signed into law in May 2006, eliminates the taxable capital and earned surplus components of the existing franchise tax and replaces these components with a taxable margin tax calculated on a combined basis. There will be no impact on Anadarko's 2006 Texas current state income taxes as the new tax is effective for reports due on or after January 1, 2008 (based on business activity during 2007). Anadarko is required to include the impact of the law change on its deferred state income taxes in income for the period which includes the date of enactment. The adjustment, a reduction in Anadarko's deferred state income taxes in the amount of $69 million, net of federal benefit, was included in the second quarter 2006 tax provision.
In addition, see
Risk Factors under Part II, Item 1a of this Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company's primary market risks are fluctuations in energy prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. These fluctuations can affect revenues and the cost of operating, investing and financing activities. The Company's risk management policy provides for the use of derivative instruments to manage these risks. The types of derivative instruments utilized by the Company include futures, swaps, options and fixed price physical delivery contracts. The volume of derivative instruments utilized by the Company is governed by the risk management policy and can vary from year to year. For information regarding the Company's accounting policies related to derivatives and additional information related to the Company's derivative instruments, see
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 7 - Debt and Note 8 - Financial Instruments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.The following activities and balances includes amounts associated with discontinued operations.
Energy Price Risk The Company's most significant market risk is the pricing for natural gas, crude oil and NGLs. Management expects energy prices to remain volatile and unpredictable. If energy prices decline significantly, revenues and cash flow would significantly decline. The Company has substantially more exposure to unfavorable changes in energy prices in 2006 than it did in prior years due to a decreased level of derivative instruments in place. In addition, a noncash writedown of the Company's oil and gas properties could be required under full cost accounting rules if period end prices decline significantly. Below is a sensitivity analysis of the Company's commodity price related derivative instruments.
Derivative Instruments Held for Non-Trading Purposes The Company had derivative instruments in place to reduce the price risk associated with future equity production of 44 Bcf of natural gas and 58 MMBbls of crude oil as of June 30, 2006 (excluding physical delivery fixed price contracts not accounted for as derivative instruments). As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $167 million on these derivative instruments. Utilizing the actual derivative contractual volumes, a 10% increase in underlying commodity prices would result in an additional loss on these derivative instruments of approximately $214 million. However, this loss would be substantially offset by an increase in the value of that portion of the Company's equity production that is hedged.
Derivative Instruments Held for Trading Purposes As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $35 million (losses of $45 million and gains of $10 million) on derivative financial instruments entered into for trading purposes and a net unrealized gain of $49 million (gains of $63 million and losses of $14 million) on physical delivery contracts entered into for trading purposes and accounted for as derivatives. Utilizing the actual derivative contractual volumes and assuming a 10% increase in underlying commodity prices, the potential additional loss on these derivative instruments would be $7 million.
For additional information regarding the Company's marketing and trading portfolio, see
Marketing Strategies under Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.Interest Rate Risk As of June 30, 2006, Anadarko has $3.6 billion of outstanding debt, all of which is fixed-rate debt. During March 2006, Anadarko entered into a 25-year swap agreement with a notional value of $600 million whereby the Company receives a fixed interest rate and pays a floating interest rate indexed to the six-month LIBOR. This agreement was entered into to better balance the fixed-rate to floating-rate percentage of the Company's debt obligations. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $47 million on the fair value of this, which was substantially offset by a reduction of the carrying value of the hedged debt. A 10% increase in interest rates that were in effect on June 30, 2006, would result in an additional unrealized loss of approximately $36 million on this swap.
During June 2006, Anadarko entered into a three-month forward-looking 30-year swap agreement with a notional value of $1.5 billion and two three-month forward-looking 10-year swap agreements with a combined notional value of $1 billion whereby the Company pays a fixed interest rate and receives a floating interest rate indexed to LIBOR. These agreements were entered into to fix the interest rate on a portion of the debt the Company expects to issue during the third quarter of 2006. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $34 million on these swaps. A 10% increase in interest rates that were in effect on June 30, 2006, would result in an unrealized gain of approximately $137 million on these swaps.
Foreign Currency Risk The Company has Canadian subsidiaries which use the Canadian dollar as their functional currency. The Company's other international subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. To the extent that business transactions in these countries are not denominated in the respective country's functional currency, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
A Canadian subsidiary has notes and debentures denominated in U.S. dollars. The potential foreign currency remeasurement impact on earnings from a 10% unfavorable change in the June 30, 2006 Canadian exchange rate against the U.S. dollar would be a loss of approximately $170 million based on the outstanding debt at June 30, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Anadarko's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer performed an evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2006.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in Anadarko's internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
See Note 14 - Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I - Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Environmental Matters The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has alleged certain violations of the Clean Water Act with respect to the Company's offshore operations. The Company met with the EPA and agreed to resolve these allegations through the payment of a $60,000 penalty and by completing a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) at a cost of $50,000. The SEP was completed in March 2006 and Anadarko filed its SEP completion report with the EPA. This matter is now closed.
In December 2003, Anadarko Gathering Company voluntarily disclosed the findings of an internal environmental audit for its facilities in Kansas to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. In April 2006, Anadarko submitted the Finalized Consent Decree and Final Order which included the assessment of a $150,000 penalty along with the funding of a SEP and a contribution to the Kansas Association for Conservation and Environmental Education. This matter is now closed.
The following risk factors update the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The mergers with Kerr-McGee and Western may not close.
The mergers with Kerr-McGee and Western both require various state and federal regulatory approvals, including the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. We cannot be certain we will obtain all of the required government approvals, and a failure to obtain the requisite approvals would prevent the applicable merger from closing.
If the proposed mergers with Kerr-McGee and Western close, we may not be able to successfully integrate our operations with Kerr Mc-Gee and Western's operations.
Integration of the three previously independent companies will be a complex, time consuming and costly process. Failure to timely and successfully integrate these companies may have a material adverse effect on the combined company's business, financial condition and result of operations. The difficulties of combining the companies will present challenges to our management, including:
The combined company will also be exposed to risks that are commonly associated with transactions similar to the mergers, such as unanticipated liabilities and costs, some of which may be material, and diversion of management's attention. As a result, the anticipated benefits of the mergers may not be fully realized, if at all.
After the mergers, our debt may limit our financial and operating flexibility.
We will be incurring approximately $23 billion in debt (including debt assumed) to consummate the Kerr-McGee and Western mergers. Assuming the mergers were completed as of June 30, 2006, our total debt would have been about $27 billion as of June 30, 2006. Our debt following the merger could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:
We may be subject to increased tax payment obligations in connection with our operations in Algeria.
Under a new hydrocarbons law adopted by the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria in April 2005 (2005 Law), the government of Algeria reorganized its regulation of the oil sector in Algeria. The government of Algeria has recently adopted legislative text that amends the 2005 Law and Law 86-14 to, among other things, impose an excess profits tax to the extent that oil prices exceed $30 per barrel. The amendments, as proposed, would affect contracts signed prior to July 2005 and have a retroactive effect to January 2006. At this time, there is uncertainty regarding the application and effect of the legislation and its amendments because implementing regulations have not been promulgated.
We operate in other countries and are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties.
Our operations in areas outside the United States are subject to various risks inherent in foreign operations. These risks may include, among other things:
Our international operations may also be adversely affected by laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade and taxation.
Realization of any of these factors could materially adversely affect our financial position.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases by the Company of its shares of common stock during the second quarter of 2006.
Total number of |
Approximate dollar |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
shares purchased |
value of shares that |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
number of |
Average |
as part of publicly |
may yet be |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
price paid |
announced plans |
purchased under the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period |
purchased (1) |
per share |
or programs |
plans or programs (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 1-30 |
41,300 |
$ |
52.39 |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 1-31 |
2,247 |
$ |
52.57 |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 1-30 |
6,170 |
$ |
48.21 |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter 2006 |
49,717 |
$ |
51.88 |
- |
$ |
636,000,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) |
During the second quarter of 2006, zero shares were purchased under the Company's share repurchase program. During the second quarter of 2006, 49,717 shares purchased were related to stock received by the Company for the payment of withholding taxes due on shares issued under employee stock plans. |
(2) |
In November 2005, the Company announced a stock buyback program to purchase up to $1 billion in shares of common stock. The Company may purchase additional shares under this program in the future; however, the repurchase program does not obligate Anadarko to acquire any specific number of shares and may be discontinued at any time. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On May 11, 2006, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The following table presents the voting results for the items that were presented for stockholder approval:
For |
Against |
Withheld or |
|||||||||||
(a) |
Election of Directors: * |
||||||||||||
Robert J. Allison, Jr. |
197,073,696 |
- |
6,310,620 |
||||||||||
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
198,918,503 |
- |
4,465,813 |
||||||||||
(b) |
Approval of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
185,266,023 |
12,811,025 |
1,307,365 |
|||||||||
(c) |
Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditors for 2006 |
199,161,782 |
2,951,107 |
1,275,520 |
|||||||||
* Those directors whose term of office continued were as follows: Larry Barcus, James L. Bryan, James T. Hackett, H. Paulett Eberhart, John R. Butler, Jr. and John R. Gordon.
Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by an asterisk (*) and are filed herewith; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated. |
Exhibit |
Original Filed |
File |
|||||
Number |
Description |
Exhibit |
Number |
||||
2(a) |
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of |
2.1 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
(b) |
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of |
2.1 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
(c) |
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of |
2.2 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
3(a) |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
4(a) to Form S-3 dated |
333-60496 |
||||
of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, |
May 9, 2001 |
||||||
dated August 28, 1986 |
|||||||
(b) |
By-laws of Anadarko Petroleum |
3(b) to Form 10-Q |
1-8968 |
||||
Corporation, as amended |
for quarter ended |
||||||
September 30, 2004 |
|||||||
(c) |
Certificate of Amendment of Anadarko's |
4.1 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
July 28, 2000 |
||||||
*(d) |
Certificate of Amendment of Anadarko's |
||||||
Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|||||||
4(a) |
Certificate of Designation of 5.46% |
4(a) to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B |
May 6, 1998 |
||||||
(b) |
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 29, |
4.1 to Form 8-A dated |
1-8968 |
||||
1998, between Anadarko Petroleum |
October 30, 1998 |
||||||
Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank |
|||||||
(c) |
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated |
2.4 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
as of April 2, 2000 between Anadarko and |
April 2, 2000 |
||||||
The Rights Agent |
|||||||
10(a) |
Form of Voting Agreement dated as of |
10.1 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
Director and Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements |
|||||||
10(b) |
Summary of Material Terms of Employment - |
10.1 to Form 8-K dated |
1-8968 |
||||
Bruce W. Busmire |
May 4, 2006 |
||||||
*12 |
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed |
||||||
Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed |
|||||||
Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |
|||||||
*31(a) |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - |
||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
|||||||
*(b) |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - |
||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
|||||||
*32 |
Section 1350 Certifications |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized officer and principal financial officer.
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION |
||||
(Registrant) |
||||
July 31, 2006 |
By: |
/s/ R. A. WALKER |
||
R. A. Walker - Senior Vice President, |
||||
|