UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

 

 

Commission file number 1-6571

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(908) 298-4000

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

Common Shares Outstanding as of June 30, 2008: 1,625,591,985

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

 

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in millions, except per share figures)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

 

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in millions)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in millions, except per share figures)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Schering-Plough Corporation and subsidiaries (Schering-Plough), have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for reporting on Form 10-Q. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations. These statements should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements included in Schering-Plough’s 2007 10-K/A.

 

In the opinion of Schering-Plough’s management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the statements of operations, cash flows and financial position for the interim periods presented.

 

In November 2007, Schering-Plough acquired Organon BioSciences N.V. (OBS), a company that discovers, develops and manufactures human prescription and animal health products. See Note 2, “Acquisition,” for additional information.

 

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard codifies the definition of fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. For calendar-year companies, the standard became effective January 1, 2008 (see Note 15, “Fair Value Measurements”) except for non-financial items measured on a non-recurring basis for which it is effective beginning January 1, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s financial statements. Based on Schering-Plough’s current financial position, the impact of the provisions of this standard that will be effective January 1, 2009 is not expected to be material.

 

In November 2006, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefits Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” which became effective for calendar-year companies on January 1, 2008. The Task Force concluded that an employer should recognize a liability for the postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement in accordance with either FASB Statement No. 106 or Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 12 based on the substantive agreement with the employee. The Task Force also concluded that an employer should recognize and measure an asset based on the nature and substance of the collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s financial statements.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 also includes an amendment to SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” which applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. For calendar-year companies, the standard became effective January 1, 2008. Schering-Plough chose not to elect the fair value option prescribed

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

by SFAS 159. As a result, the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s financial statements.

 

In June 2007, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-3, “Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities,” which became effective for calendar-year companies on January 1, 2008. The Task Force concluded that non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed, or when the goods or services are no longer expected to be provided. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements,” which is effective for calendar-year companies beginning January 1, 2009. The Task Force clarified the manner in which costs, revenues and sharing payments made to, or received by, a partner in a collaborative arrangements should be presented in the income statement and set forth certain disclosures that should be required in the partners’ financial statements. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110, which permits entities, under certain circumstances, to continue to use the “simplified” method of estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” options as discussed in SAB No. 107 and in accordance with FASB SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R). The guidance in this release became effective January 1, 2008. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations,” (SFAS 141R). For calendar-year companies, the standard is applicable to new business combinations occurring on or after January 1, 2009. SFAS 141R requires an acquiring entity to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. Most significantly, SFAS 141R will require that acquisition costs generally be expensed as incurred, certain acquired contingent liabilities be recorded at fair value, and acquired in-process research and development be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date. The standard will also impact certain unresolved matters related to purchase transactions consummated prior to the effective date of the standard. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51,” which is effective for calendar-year companies beginning January 1, 2009. The standard establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” which is effective for calendar-year companies beginning January 1, 2009. The standard enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). FSP 142-3 is effective for calendar-year companies beginning January 1, 2009. The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This standard identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The standard is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” The FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” The FSP requires companies to treat unvested share-based payment awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. The FSP is effective for calendar-year companies beginning January 1, 2009. Schering-Plough is currently assessing the potential impacts of implementing this standard.

 

 

Schering-Plough acquired Organon BioSciences N.V. (OBS) for a purchase price of approximately Euro 11 billion in cash, or approximately $16.1 billion (including legal and professional fees) on November 19, 2007 (the Acquisition Date). This acquisition added further diversification of marketed human prescription products, including two new therapeutic areas (Women’s Health and Central Nervous System), significant strength in Animal Health products and new research and development projects. The purchase method of accounting was used to account for the transaction in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The operating results of OBS are included in Schering-Plough’s consolidated financial statements for the period subsequent to the Acquisition Date.

 

A preliminary allocation of the purchase price of OBS was made as of the Acquisition Date. This allocation of the purchase price remains subject to the finalization of Schering-Plough’s management analysis of the fair value of the assets acquired (including assets related to pension plans) and liabilities assumed of OBS as of the Acquisition Date. As of June 30, 2008, the allocation of the purchase price to goodwill has decreased by $32 million as compared to the preliminary allocation as of the Acquisition Date. This adjustment to the preliminary purchase price allocation was primarily related to updated valuations of identifiable intangible assets, property and inventories partially offset by additional acquisition-related liabilities. The final allocation of the purchase price may result in additional adjustments to the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and may also result in adjustments to depreciation, amortization and acquired in-process research and development. The adjustments arising out of the finalization of the purchase price allocation will not impact cash flows. However, such adjustments could result in material increases or decreases to net income/(loss) available to common shareholders. Further revisions to the purchase price allocation will be made as additional information becomes available. The final allocation is expected to be completed no later than 12 months after the Acquisition Date.

 

Purchase accounting items of $1.048 billion related to the amortization of inventory, identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are included in depreciation and amortization in the Statement of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The updated preliminary purchase price allocation of acquired identifiable intangible assets, which resulted in a change in total intangible assets acquired of $46 million, is as follows:

 

 

The weighted-average life of total acquired intangibles is approximately 15 years. The intangible assets have no significant residual value. There were no acquired intangible assets that were determined to have an indefinite life.

 

 

Special and acquisition-related charges are as follows:

 

 

The special and acquisition-related costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included employee termination costs of $77 million and $84 million, respectively. See Note 4, “OBS Integration and Productivity Transformation Program,” for additional information. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, Schering-Plough made cash payments of $59 million for special and acquisition-related activities.

 

The special and acquisition related costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 were $11 million and $12 million, respectively, comprised of acquisition related charges (integration planning) for the planned OBS acquisition.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough made cash payments of $435 million, for the settlement of an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts involving certain of Schering-Plough’s sales, marketing and clinical trial practices and programs (the Massachusetts Investigation), cash payments of $9 million of employee termination costs related to the 2006 manufacturing streamlining and $6 million related to integration planning.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

As part of the preliminary purchase price allocation of the OBS acquisition as of the Acquisition Date, Schering-Plough recorded acquisition-related liabilities of $151 million related to involuntary termination benefits.

 

In April 2008, Schering-Plough announced a major new program, the Productivity Transformation Program (PTP), which includes the ongoing integration of OBS, and is designed to reduce and avoid costs, and increase productivity. The targeted savings envisioned by this program include those resulting from the previously announced OBS integration synergies.

 

The following table summarizes the charges, cash payments and liabilities related to PTP, which includes the ongoing integration of OBS, through June 30, 2008:

 

 

 

 

In May 2000, Schering-Plough and Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck) entered into two separate sets of agreements to jointly develop and market certain products in the U.S. including (1) two cholesterol-lowering drugs and (2) an allergy/asthma drug. In December 2001, the cholesterol agreements were expanded to include all countries of the world except Japan. In general, the companies agreed that the collaborative activities under these agreements would operate in a virtual joint venture to the maximum degree possible by relying on the respective infrastructures of the two companies. These agreements generally provide for equal sharing of development costs and for co-promotion of approved products by each company.

 

The cholesterol agreements provide for Schering-Plough and Merck to jointly develop and commercialize ezetimibe in the cholesterol management field:

 

i. as a once-daily monotherapy (marketed as ZETIA in the U.S. and Asia and EZETROL in Europe);

 

ii. in co-administration with various approved statin drugs; and

 

iii. as a fixed-combination tablet of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Zocor), Merck’s cholesterol-modifying medicine. This combination medication (ezetimibe/simvastatin) is marketed as VYTORIN in the U.S. and as INEGY in many international countries.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

ZETIA/EZETROL (ezetimibe) and VYTORIN/INEGY (the combination of ezetimibe/simvastatin) are approved for use in the U.S. and have been launched in many international markets.

 

Schering-Plough utilizes the equity method of accounting in recording its share of activity from the Merck/Schering-Plough cholesterol joint venture. As such, Schering-Plough’s net sales do not include the sales of the cholesterol joint venture. The cholesterol joint venture agreements provide for the sharing of operating income generated by the cholesterol joint venture based upon percentages that vary by product, sales level and country. In the U.S. market, Schering-Plough receives a greater share of profits on the first $300 million of annual ZETIA sales. Above $300 million of annual ZETIA sales, Merck and Schering-Plough generally share profits equally. Schering-Plough’s allocation of the cholesterol joint venture income is increased by milestones recognized. Further, either company’s share of the cholesterol joint venture’s income from operations is subject to a reduction if that company fails to perform a specified minimum number of physician details in a particular country. The companies agree annually to the minimum number of physician details by country.

 

The companies bear the costs of their own general sales forces and commercial overhead in marketing joint venture products around the world. In the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, the cholesterol agreements provide for a reimbursement to each company for physician details that are set on an annual basis, and in Italy, a contractual amount is included in the profit sharing calculation that is not reimbursed. In the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico this amount is equal to each company’s physician details multiplied by a contractual fixed fee. Schering-Plough reports these amounts as part of equity income from the cholesterol joint venture. These amounts do not represent a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs for Schering-Plough’s detailing of the cholesterol products in these markets. In addition, these amounts are not reflective of Schering-Plough’s sales effort related to the joint venture as Schering-Plough’s sales force and related costs associated with the joint venture are generally estimated to be higher.

 

Costs of the joint venture that the companies contractually share are a portion of manufacturing costs, specifically identified promotion costs (including direct-to-consumer advertising and direct and identifiable out-of-pocket promotion) and other agreed upon costs for specific services such as market support, market research, market expansion, a specialty sales force and physician education programs.

 

Certain specified research and development expenses are generally shared equally by Schering-Plough and Merck.

 

The allergy/asthma agreements provided for the joint development and marketing by the companies of a once-daily, fixed-combination tablet containing loratadine/montelukast. On April 25, 2008, the Merck/Schering-Plough joint venture received a not-approvable letter from the FDA for the proposed fixed combination of loratadine/montelukast. During the second quarter of 2008 the respiratory joint venture was terminated in accordance with the agreements. This action has no impact on the cholesterol joint venture. As a result of the termination of the respiratory joint venture, Schering- Plough expects to receive payments totaling $105 million from Merck which Schering-Plough will recognize during 2008. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Merck/Schering-Plough joint venture allocated $64 million of this amount to Schering-Plough, which is included in equity income.

 

The unaudited financial information below presents summarized combined financial information for the Merck/Schering-Plough cholesterol joint venture for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Amounts related to physician details, among other expenses, that are invoiced by Schering-Plough and Merck in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico are deducted from income from operations of the cholesterol joint venture.

 

Schering-Plough’s share of the cholesterol joint venture’s income from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $436 million and $895 million, respectively. Included in Schering-Plough’s share of income from operations is income of $64 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 related to the termination of the respiratory joint venture with Merck. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough’s share of the cholesterol joint venture’s income from operations were $436 million and $869 million, respectively. In the U.S. market, Schering-Plough receives a greater share of income from operations on the first $300 million of annual ZETIA sales. As a result, Schering-Plough’s share of the cholesterol joint venture’s income from operations is generally higher in the first quarter than in subsequent quarters.

 

The following information provides a summary of the components of Schering-Plough’s equity income from the cholesterol joint venture for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

 

Equity income from the joint venture excludes any profit arising from transactions between Schering-Plough and the joint venture until such time as there is an underlying profit realized by the joint venture in a transaction with a party other than Schering-Plough or Merck.

 

Due to the virtual nature of the cholesterol joint venture, Schering-Plough incurs substantial costs, such as selling, general and administrative costs, that are not reflected in equity income and are borne by the overall cost structure of Schering-Plough. These costs are reported on their respective line items in the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Operations and are not separately identifiable. The cholesterol agreements do not provide for any jointly owned facilities and, as such, products resulting from the joint venture are manufactured in facilities owned by either Schering-Plough or Merck.

 

During 2007, Schering-Plough announced that it had agreed with Merck to commence development of a single-tablet combination of ezetimibe and atorvastatin as a treatment for elevated cholesterol levels.

 

See Note 17, “Legal, Environmental and Regulatory Matters,” for discussion of the ENHANCE matter.

 

 

Schering-Plough adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R), effective January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of all share-based payments granted to employees. Schering-Plough elected the modified prospective transition method and therefore adjustments to prior periods were not required as a result of adopting SFAS 123R. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123R apply to all awards granted after the

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

date of adoption and to any unrecognized expense of awards unvested at the date of adoption based on the grant date fair value.

 

During the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, Schering-Plough issued its annual share-based compensation grants, including stock options and deferred stock units. A summary of the options, deferred stock units and performance-based deferred stock units granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

 

 

Options become exercisable in equal annual installments over a three-year period. The deferred stock units generally vest at the end of a three-year period from the date they were granted. The performance-based deferred stock units vest at the end of a three-year performance period if specific pre-established levels of performance, market conditions and service are met.

 

The weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, were as follows:

 

 

Total compensation expense related to stock options, deferred stock units and performance-based deferred stock units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $59 million and $119 million, respectively. Total compensation expense related to stock options, deferred stock units and performance-based deferred stock units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $46 million and $88 million, respectively.

 

At June 30, 2008, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to the performance-based deferred stock units granted in 2008 amounted to $18 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 2.5 years. The remaining unrecognized compensation cost for the performance-based deferred stock units may vary each reporting period based on changes in the expected achievement of performance measures.

 

Liability Plans

 

In addition, Schering-Plough has two compensation plans that are classified as liability plans under SFAS 123R. Schering-Plough recognized expense of $14 million and income of $21 million related to these plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough recognized expenses of $20 million and $27 million, respectively.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

The components of other expense/(income), net are as follows:

 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, Schering-Plough recognized a gain of $17 million ($12 million after tax) on the sale of a manufacturing site, which is included in Other, net.

 

In March 2007, as part of an overall risk management strategy and in consideration of various preliminary financing scenarios associated with the planned acquisition of OBS, Schering-Plough purchased a Euro-denominated currency option (derivative) for a premium of $130 million. This derivative did not qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended (SFAS 133). Accordingly, the change in fair value of this derivative was recognized in the Statement of Condensed Consolidated Operations. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough recognized mark-to-market losses of $35 million and $31 million, respectively, on this foreign currency option. This derivative was short-term (trading) in nature and did not hedge a specific financing or investing transaction. Accordingly, the cash impacts of this derivative were classified as operating cash flows in the Statement of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows. This derivative was terminated during the fourth quarter of 2007.

 

During 2007, Schering-Plough participated in health care refinancing programs adopted by local government fiscal authorities in a major European market. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough transferred $12 million and $95 million of its trade accounts receivables owned by a foreign subsidiary to third-party financial institutions without recourse. The transfer of trade accounts receivable qualified as sales of accounts receivable under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the transfer of these trade accounts receivable did not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s Statement of Condensed Consolidated Operations. Cash flows from these transactions are included in the change in accounts receivable in operating activities.

 

 

Schering-Plough expects to report a U.S. Net Operating Loss (NOL) carryforward of approximately $1.7 billion on its 2007 tax return, which will be available to offset future U.S. taxable income through 2027.

 

This U.S. NOL carryforward could be materially reduced after examination of Schering-Plough’s income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Schering-Plough continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets, as management cannot conclude that it is more likely than not the benefit of the U.S. net deferred tax assets can be realized.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

Schering-Plough has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the U.S. and certain foreign countries. In addition, Schering-Plough provides post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits primarily to its eligible U.S. retirees and their dependents through its post-retirement benefit plans.

 

The components of net pension expense were as follows:

 

 

The components of other post-retirement benefits expense were as follows:

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, Schering-Plough contributed $48 million and $96 million, respectively, to its retirement plans. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough contributed $22 million and $39 million, respectively, to its retirement plans. Schering-Plough expects to contribute approximately $119 million to its retirement plans during the remainder of 2008.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

The following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted earnings per common share computations (EPS):

 

 

Diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 is calculated based on net income available to common shareholders of $398 million and $651 million, respectively, and weighted-average diluted shares outstanding of 1.632 billion and 1.635 billion, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, Schering-Plough’s 2004 mandatory convertible preferred stock was dilutive under accounting rules. As such, diluted EPS for both periods is calculated based on net income of $539 million and $1.103 billion, respectively, and weighted-average diluted shares outstanding of 1.587 billion and 1.579 billion, respectively.

 

During the third quarter of 2007, Schering-Plough’s 2004 mandatory convertible preferred stock converted into 65 million common shares. These common shares are included in the weighted-average shares calculation for the periods after conversion.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, 65 million and 39 million, respectively, of equivalent common shares issuable under Schering-Plough’s stock incentive plans were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their effect would have been antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, 53 million and 34 million, respectively, of equivalent common shares issuable under Schering-Plough’s stock incentive plans were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their effect would have been antidilutive.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 91 million common shares obtainable upon conversion of Schering-Plough’s 2007 mandatory convertible preferred stock were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their effect would have been antidilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 65 million common shares obtainable upon conversion of the preferred stock were dilutive to EPS and were therefore included in the computation of diluted EPS.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

Comprehensive income is comprised of the following:

 

 

Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 includes a mark-to-market gain of $35 million related to a series of three interest rate swaps. The objective of the swaps was to hedge the interest rate payments to be made on future issuances of debt. As such, the swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of future interest payments, and in accordance with SFAS 133, the effective portion of the gains or losses on the hedges were reported in other comprehensive income and any ineffective portion was reported in operations. As a result of the Euro-denominated debt issuances during 2007, portions of the swaps were deemed ineffective and Schering-Plough recognized a $7 million loss in the Statement of Consolidated Operations during the fourth quarter of 2007. The effective portion of the swaps of $12 million was recorded in other comprehensive income during the fourth quarter of 2007 and is being recognized as interest expense over the life of the related debt. The cash flows related to these interest rate swaps were classified as operating cash flows in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were no open interest rate swaps.

 

 

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

The overall decrease in total inventories was primarily due to the amortization of the fair value step-up recorded as part of the OBS acquisition.

 

Included in Other assets (non-current) at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $200 million and $96 million, respectively, of inventory not expected to be sold within one year.

 

 

Goodwill at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $3.1 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. The increase at June 30, 2008 as compared to December 31, 2007 was due to foreign currency translation, partially

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

offset by a decrease of $32 million due to adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation for the OBS acquisition. See Note 2, “Acquisition.”

 

The components of other intangible assets, net are as follows:

 

 

These intangible assets are amortized on the straight-line method over their respective useful lives. The residual value of intangible assets is estimated to be zero. Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $148 million and $11 million, respectively, and $291 million and $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Annual amortization expenses related to these intangible assets for the years 2008 to 2013 is expected to be approximately $580 million.

 

 

Schering-Plough’s outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:

 

 

The decrease in the Floating rate Euro-denominated term loan due 2012 was due to an early principal repayment of Euro 200 million ($310 million) made in May 2008, offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. No prepayment penalty was incurred relating to this principal repayment. The other changes in

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

outstanding Euro-denominated borrowings at June 30, 2008 were due to foreign currency translation on Euro-denominated debt balances.

 

 

Schering-Plough’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2008 includes the following assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

The majority of Schering-Plough’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are measured using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical items (Level 1) as inputs, multiplied by the number of units held at the balance sheet date. As of June 30, 2008, assets and liabilities with fair values measured using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) include measurements using quoted prices for identical items in markets that are not active and measurements using inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

 

 

Schering-Plough has three reportable segments: Human Prescription Pharmaceuticals, Animal Health and Consumer Health Care. The segment sales and profit data that follow are consistent with Schering-Plough’s current management reporting structure. The Human Prescription Pharmaceuticals segment discovers, develops, manufactures and markets human pharmaceutical products. The Animal Health segment discovers, develops, manufactures and markets animal health products. The Consumer Health Care segment develops, manufactures and markets over-the-counter, foot care and sun care products, primarily in the U.S.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Net sales by segment:

 

 

Net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 includes the net sales of OBS products acquired on November 19, 2007.

 

Profit by segment:

 

 

 

 

Schering-Plough’s consolidated net sales do not include sales of VYTORIN and ZETIA, which are managed in the cholesterol joint venture with Merck, as Schering-Plough accounts for this joint venture under the equity method of accounting (see Note 5, “Equity Income,” for additional information). The Human Prescription Pharmaceuticals segment includes equity income from the Merck/Schering-Plough joint venture.

 

“Corporate and other” includes interest income and expense, foreign exchange gains and losses, currency option gains, headquarters expenses, special and acquisition-related charges and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies used for segment reporting are the same as those described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in Schering-Plough’s 2007 10-K/A.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Sales of products comprising 10 percent or more of Schering-Plough’s U.S. or international sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were as follows:

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, net sales outside the U.S. totaled $3.5 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively. This approximated 70 percent of consolidated net sales for both periods.

 

Schering-Plough does not disaggregate assets on a segment basis for internal management reporting and, therefore, such information is not presented.

 

17.  LEGAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY MATTERS

 

Background

 

Schering-Plough is involved in various claims, investigations and legal proceedings.

 

Schering-Plough records a liability for contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Schering-Plough adjusts its liabilities for contingencies to reflect the current best estimate of probable loss or minimum liability, as the case may be. Where no best estimate is determinable, Schering-Plough records the minimum amount within the most probable range of its liability. Expected insurance recoveries have not been considered in determining the amounts of recorded liabilities for environmental related matters.

 

If Schering-Plough believes that a loss contingency is reasonably possible, rather than probable, or the amount of loss cannot be estimated, no liability is recorded. However, where a liability is reasonably possible, disclosure of the loss contingency is made.

 

Schering-Plough reviews the status of all claims, investigations and legal proceedings on an ongoing basis, including related insurance coverages. From time to time, Schering-Plough may settle or otherwise resolve these matters on terms and conditions management believes are in the best interests of Schering-Plough. Resolution of any or all claims, investigations and legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on Schering-Plough’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

 

Except for the matters discussed in the remainder of this Note, the recorded liabilities for contingencies at June 30, 2008, and the related expenses incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were not material. In the opinion of management, based on the advice of legal counsel, the ultimate outcome of these matters, except matters discussed in the remainder of this Note, will not have a material impact on Schering-Plough’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

 

ENHANCE Matter

 

In early 2008, the Merck / Schering-Plough cholesterol joint venture announced the results of the ENHANCE (Effect of Combination Ezetimibe and High-Dose Simvastatin vs. Simvastatin Alone on the Atherosclerotic Process in Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia) clinical trial. Schering-Plough encountered a challenge affecting sales of ZETIA and VYTORIN when the results of the ENHANCE

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

trial, as well as the length of time that expired between the last patient having an ultrasound image taken for the trial through the final analysis and the unblinding of data, became the subjects of intense scrutiny and varying interpretations in the media.

 

Schering-Plough, the joint venture and/or its joint venture partner, Merck, have received a number of governmental inquiries and have been the subject of a number of investigations with respect to the timing and disclosures relating to the ENHANCE clinical trial, the trial results, and in some cases sales of stock by the companies’ officers prior to release of the results of the ENHANCE clinical trial. Since mid-January 2008, Schering-Plough has become aware of or been served with litigation relating to such matters.

 

Schering-Plough is cooperating fully with the various investigations and responding to the requests for information, and Schering-Plough intends to vigorously defend the lawsuits that have been filed relating to these matters.

 

Earlier this year, after the initial release of ENHANCE data, the FDA stated that it would review the results of the trial, which may take approximately six months.

 

Please refer to “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 in Schering-Plough’s 2007 10-K/A and Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” in this 10-Q for additional information. Also see Part II, OTHER INFORMATION, “Recent Cholesterol Clinical Trials,” for information about another clinical trial relating to VYTORIN, SEAS.

 

AWP Litigation and Investigations

 

Schering-Plough continues to respond to existing and new litigation by certain states and private payors and investigations by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice and several states into industry and Schering-Plough practices regarding average wholesale price (AWP). Schering-Plough is cooperating with these investigations.

 

These litigations and investigations relate to whether the AWP used by pharmaceutical companies for certain drugs improperly exceeds the average prices paid by providers and, as a consequence, results in unlawful inflation of certain reimbursements for drugs by state programs and private payors that are based on AWP. The complaints allege violations of federal and state law, including fraud, Medicaid fraud and consumer protection violations, among other claims. In the majority of cases, the plaintiffs are seeking class certifications. In some cases, classes have been certified. The outcome of these litigations and investigations could include substantial damages, the imposition of substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies.

 

Securities and Class Action Litigation

 

Federal Securities Litigation

 

Following Schering-Plough’s announcement that the FDA had been conducting inspections of Schering-Plough’s manufacturing facilities in New Jersey and Puerto Rico and had issued reports citing deficiencies concerning compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, several lawsuits were filed against Schering-Plough and certain named officers. These lawsuits allege that the defendants violated the federal securities law by allegedly failing to disclose material information and making material misstatements. Specifically, they allege that Schering-Plough failed to disclose an alleged serious risk that a new drug application for CLARINEX would be delayed as a result of these manufacturing issues, and they allege that Schering-Plough failed to disclose the alleged depth and severity of its manufacturing issues. These complaints were consolidated into one action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on October 11, 2001, purporting to represent a class of shareholders who purchased shares of Schering-Plough stock from May 9, 2000 through February 15, 2001. The complaint seeks compensatory damages on behalf of the class. The Court certified the shareholder class on October 10, 2003.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Notice of pendency of the class action was sent to members of that class in July 2007. Discovery has been completed, and motions for summary judgment have been briefed and are pending.

 

ERISA Litigation

 

On March 31, 2003, Schering-Plough was served with a putative class action complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey alleging that Schering-Plough, retired Chairman, CEO and President Richard Jay Kogan, Schering-Plough’s Employee Savings Plan (Plan) administrator, several current and former directors, and certain former corporate officers breached their fiduciary obligations to certain participants in the Plan. The complaint seeks damages in the amount of losses allegedly suffered by the Plan. The complaint was dismissed on June 29, 2004. The plaintiffs appealed. On August 19, 2005 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the dismissal by the District Court and the matter has been remanded back to the District Court for further proceedings.

 

K-DUR Antitrust Litigation

 

Schering-Plough had settled patent litigation with Upsher-Smith, Inc. (Upsher-Smith) and ESI Lederle, Inc. (Lederle) relating to generic versions of K-DUR, Schering-Plough’s long-acting potassium chloride product supplement used by cardiac patients, for which Lederle and Upsher Smith had filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications. Following the commencement of an FTC administrative proceeding alleging anti-competitive effects from those settlements (which has been resolved in Schering-Plough’s favor), alleged class action suits were filed in federal and state courts on behalf of direct and indirect purchasers of K-DUR against Schering-Plough, Upsher-Smith and Lederle. These suits claim violations of federal and state antitrust laws, as well as other state statutory and common law causes of action. These suits seek unspecified damages. Discovery is ongoing.

 

Third-Party Payor Actions

 

Several purported class action litigations have been filed following the announcement of the settlement of the Massachusetts Investigation. Plaintiffs in these actions seek damages on behalf of third-party payors resulting from the allegations of off-label promotion and improper payments to physicians that were at issue in the Massachusetts Investigation.

 

Tax Matters

 

In October 2001, IRS auditors asserted that two interest rate swaps that Schering-Plough entered into with an unrelated party should be recharacterized as loans from affiliated companies, resulting in additional tax liability for the 1991 and 1992 tax years. In September 2004, Schering-Plough made payments to the IRS in the amount of $194 million for income tax and $279 million for interest. Schering-Plough filed refund claims for the tax and interest with the IRS in December 2004. Following the IRS’s denial of Schering-Plough’s claims for a refund, Schering-Plough filed suit in May 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey for refund of the full amount of the tax and interest. This refund litigation has been tried in Newark District Court and a decision has not yet been rendered. Schering-Plough’s tax reserves were adequate to cover the above-mentioned payments.

 

Pending Administrative Obligations

 

In connection with the settlement of an investigation with the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Schering-Plough entered into a five-year corporate integrity agreement (CIA). The CIA was amended in August of 2006 in connection with the settlement of the Massachusetts Investigation, commencing a new five-year term. Failure to comply with the obligations under the CIA could result in financial penalties.

 

SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Other Matters

 

Product Liability

 

Beginning in May of 2007, a number of complaints have been filed in various jurisdictions asserting claims against Organon USA, Inc., Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and/or Organon International (“Organon”) arising from Organon’s marketing and sale of NUVARING, a combined hormonal contraceptive vaginal ring. The plaintiffs contend that Organon failed to adequately warn of the alleged increased risk of venous thromboembolism (“VTE”) posed by NUVARING, and/or downplayed the risk of VTE. The plaintiffs seek damages for injuries allegedly sustained from their product use, including some alleged deaths, heart attacks and strokes. The majority of the cases are currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Other cases are pending in Wisconsin, Missouri, New York and Georgia.

 

French Matter

 

Based on a complaint to the French competition authority from a competitor in France and pursuant to a court order, the French competition authority has obtained documents from a French subsidiary of Schering-Plough relating to SUBUTEX, one of the products that the subsidiary markets and sells. Any resolution of this matter adverse to the French subsidiary could result in the imposition of civil fines and injunctive or administrative remedies. On July 17, 2007, the Juge des Libertés et de la Détention ordered the annulment of the search and seizure on procedural grounds. On July 19, 2007, the French authority appealed the order to the French Supreme Court.

 

In April 2007, the competitor also requested interim relief, a portion of which was granted by the French competition authority in December 2007. The interim relief required Schering-Plough’s French subsidiary to publish in two specialized newspapers information including that the generic has the same quantitative and qualitative composition and the same pharmaceutical form as, and is substitutable for, SUBUTEX. In February 2008, the Paris Court of Appeal confirmed the decision of the French competition authority.

 

Environmental

 

Schering-Plough has responsibilities for environmental cleanup under various state, local and federal laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund. At several Superfund sites (or equivalent sites under state law), Schering-Plough is alleged to be a potentially responsible party (PRP). Schering-Plough believes that it is remote at this time that there is any material liability in relation to such sites. Schering-Plough estimates its obligations for cleanup costs for Superfund sites based on information obtained from the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), an equivalent state agency and/or studies prepared by independent engineers, and on the probable costs to be paid by other PRPs. Schering-Plough records a liability for environmental assessments and/or cleanup when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Schering-Plough Corporation

 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Schering-Plough Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2008, and the related statements of condensed consolidated operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the statements of condensed consolidated cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of consolidated operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 29, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Parsippany, New Jersey

July 31, 2008

 

 

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

 

Overview of Schering-Plough

 

Schering-Plough is an innovation-driven science-centered global health care company. Schering-Plough discovers, develops and manufactures pharmaceuticals for three customer markets — human prescription, animal health and consumer. While most of the research and development activity is directed toward human prescription products, there are important applications of this central research and development platform into the animal health products and the consumer health care products. Schering-Plough also accesses external innovation via partnering, in-licensing and acquisition for all three customer markets.

 

Strategy — Focused on Science

 

In 2003, soon after Fred Hassan was elected as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation, he initiated a six-to-eight year strategic plan, called the Action Agenda. A key component of the Action Agenda is applying science to meet unmet medical needs. A core strategy of Schering-Plough is to invest substantial funds in scientific research with the goal of creating therapies and treatments that address important unmet medical needs and also have commercial value. Consistent with this core strategy, Schering-Plough is increasing its investment in research and development. Schering-Plough has been successful in advancing the pipeline and has several late-stage projects that will require sizable resources to complete. As Schering-Plough continues to develop the later-phase pipeline compounds (e.g., golimumab, sugammadex, thrombin receptor antagonist, vicriviroc, boceprevir and asenapine), it anticipates higher spending on clinical trial activities. Schering-Plough’s progressing early pipeline includes drug candidates across a wide range of therapeutic areas.

 

Another key component of the Action Agenda is the focus on building long-term value for shareholders and for the patients who rely upon Schering-Plough’s drugs. This longer-term focus includes concurrent emphasis on growing sales, disciplined cost controls and investing in research and development for the future.

 

Early on, Hassan and the new management team that he recruited applied the Action Agenda to stabilizing, repairing and turning around Schering-Plough after Schering-Plough encountered challenges earlier this decade under a prior management team.

 

Currently, Schering-Plough continues work in the fourth of five phases of the Action Agenda. During the fourth, or Build the Base phase, Schering-Plough continues to focus on its strategy of value creation across a broad front. Over the past four years, sales of Schering-Plough pharmaceutical products across an array of therapeutic areas showed strong growth compared to prior periods and other pharmaceutical companies. Schering-Plough’s pharmaceutical sales and marketing activities expanded geographically, including into Brazil, China and Russia. This geographic diversity adds to growth and makes performance less sensitive to any one geographic area. The strategic Organon BioSciences N.V. (OBS) acquisition was closed in November 2007 and significant integration activities continue. The OBS acquisition added further diversification of marketed products, including two new therapeutic areas (Women’s Health and Central Nervous System); key pipeline projects; significant strength in the Animal Health products and pipeline; and significant talent, including in key research and development functions.

 

As part of the Action Agenda, Schering-Plough continues to work to enhance infrastructure, upgrade processes and systems and strengthen talent. While these efforts are being implemented on a companywide basis, Schering-Plough is focusing especially on research and development to support Schering-Plough’s science-based business.

 

The pharmaceutical industry is under increasing political and regulatory pressure, particularly in the United States and Schering-Plough and the Merck/Schering-Plough cholesterol joint venture have encountered specific challenges during 2008, as explained in more detail in Part II, OTHER INFORMATION, “Recent Cholesterol Clinical Trials.”

The strength Schering-Plough built during the earlier phases of the Action Agenda, including the diversified group of products, customer segments, and geographic areas, as well as its highly experienced executive team, will be helpful in weathering current and future challenges, including those relating to the Merck/Schering-Plough cholesterol joint venture.

 

Regarding challenges in regard to the recent cholesterol clinical trials, Schering-Plough’s strategy is centered on emphasizing the science around high LDL cholesterol (low-density lipoprotein, often known as “bad cholesterol”), which medical experts and health advisory groups have long recognized as a significant cardiovascular risk factor and recommended increasingly aggressive treatment of high cholesterol for certain patients. Lowering LDL cholesterol, along with a healthy diet and lifestyle changes, remains the cornerstone of lipid treatment for patients at risk for heart disease. Clinical studies have demonstrated that VYTORIN lowers patients’ LDL cholesterol more than rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin at the doses studied and was able to get more patients to the LDL cholesterol goals identified by the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. The ENHANCE and Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) clinical trials also demonstrated superior LDL cholesterol lowering with VYTORIN compared to simvastatin (ENHANCE) and placebo (SEAS). See “Outlook” for the current perspective on the effects of these challenges on Schering-Plough’s business.

 

In April 2008, Schering-Plough announced the Productivity Transformation Program (PTP). The goal of this program, which includes the ongoing integration of OBS, is to create a leaner, stronger company to support Schering-Plough’s goal of building long-term high performance despite the current challenging pharmaceutical industry environment and the particular challenges facing Schering-Plough. This program targets savings of $1.5 billion on an annualized basis by 2012 and is designed to reduce and avoid costs, while increasing productivity. Of the total targeted savings, approximately $1.25 billion are anticipated to be accomplished by the end of 2010 with the balance achieved by 2012. The targeted savings envisioned by this program include those resulting from the previously announced OBS integration synergies. Beyond this program, Schering-Plough anticipates investing in new high priority clinical trials, the pursuit of strategic opportunities, including product launches and anticipates natural cost growth. Approximately 1,100 positions have been eliminated through June 30, 2008.

 

Results and Highlights for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:

 

 

Strategic Alliances

 

As is typical in the pharmaceutical industry, Schering-Plough licenses manufacturing, marketing and/or distribution rights to certain products to others, and also manufactures, markets and/or distributes products owned by others pursuant to licensing and joint venture arrangements. Any time that third parties are involved, there are additional factors relating to the third party and outside the control of Schering-Plough that may create positive or negative impacts on Schering-Plough. VYTORIN, ZETIA and REMICADE are subject to such arrangements and are key to Schering-Plough’s current business and financial performance.

 

In addition, any potential strategic alternatives may be impacted by the change of control provisions in those arrangements, which could result in VYTORIN and ZETIA being acquired by Merck or REMICADE reverting back to Centocor. The change in control provision relating to VYTORIN and ZETIA is included in the contract with Merck, filed as Exhibit 10(r) to Schering-Plough’s 2007 10-K/A, and the change of control provision relating to REMICADE is contained in the contract with Centocor, filed as Exhibit 10(v) to Schering-Plough’s 2007 10-K/A.

 

Cholesterol Franchise

 

Schering-Plough’s cholesterol franchise products, VYTORIN and ZETIA, are managed through a joint venture between Schering-Plough and Merck for the treatment of elevated cholesterol levels in all markets outside Japan. ZETIA is Schering-Plough’s novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor. VYTORIN is the combination of ZETIA and Zocor (simvastatin), a statin medication developed by Merck. The financial commitment to compete in the cholesterol reduction market is shared with Merck, and profits from the sales of VYTORIN and ZETIA are also shared with Merck. The operating results of the joint venture with Merck are recorded using the equity method of accounting.

 

The cholesterol-reduction market is the single largest pharmaceutical category in the world. VYTORIN and ZETIA are competing in this market. Global total combined sales of VYTORIN and ZETIA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, decreased 10 percent and 2 percent, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, total combined sales of VYTORIN and ZETIA outside the U.S. increased 37 percent and 41 percent, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, total combined sales of VYTORIN and ZETIA in the U.S. declined 26 percent and 16 percent, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. As of June 2008, total combined prescription share for VYTORIN and ZETIA in the U.S. was down approximately five market share points versus December 2007 from 16.9 percent to 12.1 percent. Media reaction to the release of the results of the ENHANCE clinical trial in early 2008 led some commentators to call for the use of other products, rather than VYTORIN and ZETIA. Continued reductions in the sales and/or market share of Schering-Plough’s cholesterol franchise would have a significant impact on Schering-Plough’s consolidated results of operations and cash flows. In the past, Schering-Plough’s profitability has been largely dependent upon the performance of the cholesterol franchise; while performance of the cholesterol franchise is still material to Schering-Plough, as the product diversity has become stronger (through the OBS acquisition as well as development of other Schering-Plough products) the dependence on the cholesterol franchise is lessening.

 

Japan is not included in the joint venture with Merck. In the Japanese market, Bayer Healthcare is co-marketing Schering-Plough’s cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, ZETIA, which was approved in Japan in April 2007 as a monotherapy and co-administered with a statin for use in patients with hypercholesterolemia, familial hypercholesterolemia or homozygous sitosterolemia. ZETIA was launched in Japan during June 2007. Schering-Plough’s sales of ZETIA in Japan under the co-marketing agreement with Bayer Healthcare are recognized in net sales.

 

License Arrangements with Centocor

 

REMICADE is prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, early rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ankylosing spondylitis, plaque psoriasis and ulcerative colitis. REMICADE is Schering-Plough’s second largest marketed pharmaceutical product line (after the

cholesterol franchise). REMICADE is licensed from and manufactured by Centocor, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson company. During 2005, Schering-Plough exercised an option under its contract with Centocor for license rights to develop and commercialize golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody which has been filed for approval in Europe. Schering-Plough has exclusive marketing rights to both products outside the U.S., Japan and certain Asian markets. In December 2007, Schering-Plough and Centocor revised their distribution agreement regarding the development, commercialization and distribution of both REMICADE and golimumab, extending Schering-Plough’s rights to exclusively market REMICADE to match the duration of Schering-Plough’s exclusive marketing rights for golimumab. Effective upon regulatory approval of golimumab in the EU, Schering-Plough’s marketing rights for both products will now extend for 15 years after the first commercial sale of golimumab within the EU. Centocor will receive a progressively increased share of profits on Schering-Plough’s distribution of both products in the Schering-Plough marketing territory between 2010 and 2014, and the share of profits will remain fixed thereafter for the remainder of the term. The changes to the duration of REMICADE marketing rights and the profit sharing arrangement for the products are all conditioned on approval of golimumab being granted prior to September 1, 2014. Schering-Plough may independently develop and market golimumab for a Crohn’s disease indication in its territories, with an option for Centocor to participate. In addition, Schering-Plough and Centocor agreed to utilize an autoinjector device in the commercialization of golimumab and further agreed to share its development costs.

 

Manufacturing, Sales and Marketing

 

Schering-Plough supports commercialized products with manufacturing, sales and marketing efforts. Schering-Plough is also moving forward with additional investments to enhance its infrastructure and business, including capital expenditures for the drug development process (where products are moved from the drug discovery pipeline to markets), information technology systems, and post-marketing studies and monitoring.

 

Schering-Plough continually reviews the business, including manufacturing operations, to identify actions that will enhance long-term competitiveness. However, Schering-Plough’s manufacturing cost base is relatively fixed, and actions to significantly reduce Schering-Plough’s manufacturing infrastructure, including specific reviews of Schering-Plough’s manufacturing operations that will be made as part of PTP involve complex issues. As a result, shifting products between manufacturing plants can take many years due to construction and regulatory requirements, including revalidation and registration requirements. Future events and decisions may lead to asset impairments or related costs.

 

Regulatory and Competitive Environment

 

Schering-Plough is subject to the jurisdiction of various national, state and local regulatory agencies. Regulatory compliance is complex and costly, impacting the timing needed to bring new drugs to market and to market drugs for new indications.

 

Schering-Plough engages in clinical trial research in many countries around the world. Research activities must comply with stringent regulatory standards and are subject to inspection by the U.S., the EU, and local country regulatory authorities. Schering-Plough is subject to pharmacovigilance reporting requirements in many countries and other jurisdictions, including the U.S., the EU, and the EU member states. Clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance of certain marketed drugs of competitors within the industry have raised safety concerns that have led to recalls, withdrawals or adverse labeling of marketed products.

 

A number of intermediaries are involved between drug manufacturers, such as Schering-Plough, and patients who use the drugs. These intermediaries impact the patient’s ability, and their prescribers’ ability, to choose and pay for a particular drug. These intermediaries include health care providers, such as hospitals and clinics; payors and their representatives, such as employers, insurers, managed care organizations and governments; and others in the supply chain, such as pharmacists and wholesalers. Further, in the U.S., many of Schering-Plough’s pharmaceutical products are subject to increasingly competitive pricing as certain of the intermediaries (including managed care groups, institutions and government agencies) seek price discounts. In most international markets, Schering-Plough operates in an environment of government-mandated cost-containment programs. Also, the pricing, sales and marketing programs and arrangements, and related business

practices of Schering-Plough and other participants in the health care industry are under continued scrutiny from federal and state regulatory, investigative, prosecutorial and administrative entities.

 

The market for pharmaceutical products is competitive. Schering-Plough’s operations may be affected by technological advances of competitors, industry consolidation, patents granted to competitors, loss of patent protection due to challenges by competitors, competitive combination products, new products of competitors, new information from clinical trials of marketed products or post-marketing surveillance and generic competition as Schering-Plough’s products mature.

 

OBS Acquisition

 

On November 19, 2007, Schering-Plough acquired OBS for a purchase price of approximately Euro 11 billion in cash, or approximately $16.1 billion.

 

Commencing from the acquisition date, OBS’ assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the results of OBS’ operations, are included in Schering-Plough’s consolidated financial statements.

 

The impact of purchase accounting, based on a preliminary valuation, resulted in the following non-cash pre-tax items during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:

 

 

DISCUSSION OF OPERATING RESULTS

 

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 discussed below include OBS’ product sales and expenses as well as certain non-cash items relating to purchase accounting associated with the OBS acquisition.

 

Net Sales

 

A significant portion of net sales is made to major pharmaceutical and health care product distributors and major retail chains in the U.S. Consequently, net sales and quarterly growth comparisons may be affected by fluctuations in the buying patterns of major distributors, retail chains and other trade buyers. These fluctuations may result from seasonality; pricing; wholesaler, retail and trade buying decisions; changes in overall demand factors or other factors. In addition to these fluctuations, sales of many pharmaceutical products in the U.S. are subject to increased pricing pressure from managed care groups, institutions, government agencies, and other groups seeking discounts. Schering-Plough and other pharmaceutical manufacturers in the U.S. market are also required to provide statutorily defined rebates to various government agencies in order to participate in the Medicaid program, veterans’ health care programs and other government-funded programs. The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 contains a prescription drug benefit for individuals who are eligible for Medicare and has resulted in increased use of generics and increased purchasing power of those negotiating on behalf of Medicare recipients. In most international markets, Schering-Plough operates in an environment where governments have mandated cost-containment programs, placed restrictions on physician prescription levels and patient reimbursements, emphasized greater use of generic drugs and enacted across-the-board price cuts as methods to control costs.

Consolidated net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $4.9 billion, an increase of $1.7 billion or 55 percent compared with the same period in 2007, including an estimated impact of 7.6 percent from foreign exchange on stand-alone Schering-Plough net sales. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, consolidated net sales totaled $9.6 billion, an increase of $3.4 billion or 56 percent as compared to the same period in 2007, including an estimated impact of 7.4 percent from foreign exchange on stand-alone Schering-Plough net sales. The impact of currency is more pronounced on products and businesses that are concentrated in Europe.

 

Consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included $1.4 billion and $2.8 billion of net sales of OBS products. The increase in net sales also reflects the growth in sales volumes of REMICADE and TEMODAR as well as Animal Health and Consumer Health Care products.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, net sales outside the U.S. totaled $3.5 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively. Net sales outside the U.S. approximated 70 percent of consolidated net sales for both periods.

 

Net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows: