e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSISTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-120152
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter )
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-2018365 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification
number) |
|
|
|
3220 Tillman Drive-Suite 300, Bensalem, Pennsylvania
|
|
19020 |
|
(Address of principal executive office)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 215-639-4274
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files
YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common Stock, $.01 Par Value: 43,461,000 shares outstanding as of July
21, 2009.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
24,539,000 |
|
|
$ |
37,501,000 |
|
Marketable securities, at fair value |
|
$ |
52,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,414,000 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $3,950,000 in 2009 and $3,214,000 in 2008 |
|
|
105,689,000 |
|
|
|
96,558,000 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
1,239,000 |
|
|
|
2,838,000 |
|
Inventories and supplies |
|
|
16,544,000 |
|
|
|
16,079,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
4,769,000 |
|
|
|
4,225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
205,431,000 |
|
|
|
206,615,000 |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laundry and linen equipment installations |
|
|
1,785,000 |
|
|
|
1,767,000 |
|
Housekeeping equipment and office furniture |
|
|
16,347,000 |
|
|
|
16,365,000 |
|
Autos and trucks |
|
|
278,000 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,410,000 |
|
|
|
18,225,000 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
14,299,000 |
|
|
|
14,296,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,111,000 |
|
|
|
3,929,000 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
17,054,000 |
|
|
|
15,020,000 |
|
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, Less accumulated amortization of
$3,124,000 in 2009 and $2,466,000 in 2008 |
|
|
9,776,000 |
|
|
|
5,033,000 |
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE- long term portion, net of discount |
|
|
6,466,000 |
|
|
|
3,202,000 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION FUNDING, at fair value |
|
|
9,157,000 |
|
|
|
8,287,000 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES- long term portion |
|
|
7,049,000 |
|
|
|
6,386,000 |
|
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
259,112,000 |
|
|
$ |
248,561,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
9,385,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,301,000 |
|
Accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll taxes |
|
|
15,140,000 |
|
|
|
14,365,000 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
1,280,000 |
|
|
|
679,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
670,000 |
|
|
|
754,000 |
|
Accrued insurance claims |
|
|
4,385,000 |
|
|
|
3,943,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
30,860,000 |
|
|
|
29,042,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED INSURANCE CLAIMS- long term portion |
|
|
10,233,000 |
|
|
|
9,201,000 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION LIABILITY |
|
|
9,319,000 |
|
|
|
8,636,000 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized,
45,641,000 shares issued in 2009 and 45,563,000 in 2008 |
|
|
457,000 |
|
|
|
456,000 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
90,046,000 |
|
|
|
84,421,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
138,078,000 |
|
|
|
137,741,000 |
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 2,216,000 shares in 2009 and
2,335,000 in 2008 |
|
|
(19,881,000 |
) |
|
|
(20,936,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
208,700,000 |
|
|
|
201,682,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
259,112,000 |
|
|
$ |
248,561,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
-2-
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
170,896,000 |
|
|
$ |
147,918,000 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided |
|
|
145,830,000 |
|
|
|
127,074,000 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
13,516,000 |
|
|
|
10,124,000 |
|
Other Income : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest |
|
|
1,157,000 |
|
|
|
585,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
12,707,000 |
|
|
|
11,305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,892,000 |
|
|
|
4,352,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
7,815,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,953,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding |
|
|
43,537,000 |
|
|
|
43,080,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding |
|
|
44,262,000 |
|
|
|
43,962,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
-3-
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
331,305,000 |
|
|
$ |
295,177,000 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided |
|
|
283,722,000 |
|
|
|
252,928,000 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
24,392,000 |
|
|
|
20,703,000 |
|
Other Income : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest |
|
|
2,094,000 |
|
|
|
909,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
25,285,000 |
|
|
|
22,455,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
9,734,000 |
|
|
|
8,645,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
15,551,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,810,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding |
|
|
43,497,000 |
|
|
|
43,048,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of
Common Shares outstanding |
|
|
44,168,000 |
|
|
|
44,088,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
-4-
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
15,551,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,810,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,513,000 |
|
|
|
1,494,000 |
|
Bad debt provision |
|
|
1,450,000 |
|
|
|
850,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(747,000 |
) |
|
|
46,000 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
499,000 |
|
|
|
381,000 |
|
Amortization of premium on marketable securities |
|
|
464,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities |
|
|
(373,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on deferred compensation fund
investments |
|
|
(522,000 |
) |
|
|
491,000 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(10,581,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,446,000 |
) |
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
1,599,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories and supplies |
|
|
(190,000 |
) |
|
|
(290,000 |
) |
Notes receivable- long term portion |
|
|
(3,264,000 |
) |
|
|
480,000 |
|
Deferred compensation funding |
|
|
(348,000 |
) |
|
|
134,000 |
|
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
|
|
656,000 |
|
|
|
(1,154,000 |
) |
Accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll taxes |
|
|
293,000 |
|
|
|
1,340,000 |
|
Accrued insurance claims |
|
|
1,474,000 |
|
|
|
(634,000 |
) |
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
1,037,000 |
|
|
|
(435,000 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(418,000 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
6,552,000 |
|
|
|
(1,135,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15,063,000 |
|
|
|
9,514,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals of fixed assets |
|
|
211,000 |
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(1,064,000 |
) |
|
|
(729,000 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(3,329,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition |
|
|
(4,613,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,795,000 |
) |
|
|
(647,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,551,000 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(15,214,000 |
) |
|
|
(11,603,000 |
) |
Repayment of debt assumed in acquisition |
|
|
(4,718,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reissuance of treasury stock pursuant to Dividend Reinvestment
Plan |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
423,000 |
|
|
|
2,407,000 |
|
Tax benefit from equity compensation plans |
|
|
236,000 |
|
|
|
3,135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(19,230,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,581,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(12,962,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,714,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
37,501,000 |
|
|
|
92,461,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
24,539,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,747,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
8,646,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,883,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 66,000 shares of Common Stock related to acquisition |
|
$ |
4,494,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 49,000 shares of Common Stock in 2009 and
61,000 shares of Common Stock in 2008 pursuant to
Employee Stock Plans |
|
$ |
777,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,293,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
-5-
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
45,563,000 |
|
|
$ |
456,000 |
|
|
$ |
84,421,000 |
|
|
$ |
137,741,000 |
|
|
|
($20,936,000 |
) |
|
$ |
201,682,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,551,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,551,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and other stock-based compensation,
net of 2,000 shares tendered for payment |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
422,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit arising from Stock Plans transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares issued for Deferred Compensation Plan
funding and redemptions (21,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
354,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to Employee Stock Plans (49,000
shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426,000 |
|
|
|
777,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends $.35 per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,214,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,214,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to Dividend Reinvestment Plan (3,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to acquisition (66,000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,903,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,000 |
|
|
|
4,494,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
45,641,000 |
|
|
$ |
457,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,046,000 |
|
|
$ |
138,078,000 |
|
|
|
($19,881,000 |
) |
|
$ |
208,700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
-6-
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Reporting
The accompanying financial statements are unaudited and do not include certain information and
note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
complete financial statements. However, in our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The balance
sheet shown in this report as of December 31, 2008 has been derived from, and does not include, all
the disclosures contained in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of
operations for either the quarter or six month period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year.
As of June 30, 2009, we operate one wholly-owned subsidiary, Huntingdon Holdings, Inc.
(Huntingdon). Huntingdon invests our cash and cash equivalents, as well as managing our portfolio
of marketable securities. On March 1, 2009, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary HCSG Supply, Inc.
(Supply) for approximately $1,100,000, financed principally through our acceptance of a secured
promissory note which is recorded in our notes receivable in the accompanying June 30, 2009 balance
sheet. As a result of the Supply sale, we recorded an immaterial gain in our 2009 first quarter
consolidated statements of income.
On April 30, 2009, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire essentially all of the assets
of Contract Environmental Services, Inc (CES), a South Carolina based corporation which is a
provider of professional housekeeping, laundry and dietary services to long-term care and related
facilities. We believe the acquisition of CES expands and compliments our position of being the
largest provider of such services to long-term care and related facilities in the United States.
The aggregate consideration, subject to future revision, was approximately $13,800,000 consisting
of approximately: (i) $4,600,000 in cash, (ii) a current issuance of approximately 66,000 shares of
our common stock (valued at approximately $1,183,000) and a future issuance of approximately
265,000 shares (valued at approximately $3,311,000) contingent upon the achievement of certain
financial targets, and (iii) the repayment of approximately $4,700,000 of certain debt obligations
of CES. The allocation of such consideration has resulted in our recording in the accompanying June
30, 2009 consolidated balance sheets of the following assets; (i) approximately $8,900,000
consisting primarily of accounts receivable, (ii) $5,400,000 of amortizable intangible assets, and
(iii) $2,000,000 of goodwill. Additionally, pursuant to the transaction we assumed approximately
$2,500,000 of certain other liabilities of the seller.
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are used for, but
not limited to, our allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued insurance claims, asset
valuations and review for potential impairment, stock-based compensation, and deferred tax
-7-
benefits. The estimates are based upon various factors including current and historical trends, as
well as other pertinent industry and regulatory authority information. We regularly evaluate this
information to determine if it is necessary to update the basis for our estimates and to compensate
for known changes.
Inventories and supplies include housekeeping, linen and laundry supplies, as well as food
provisions. Inventories and supplies are stated at cost to approximate a first-in, first-out (FIFO)
basis. Linen supplies are amortized over a 24 month period.
Revenues from services provided and equipment sales are recorded net of sales taxes.
Note 2 Fair Value Measurements and Marketable Securities
Certain of our assets and liabilities are reported at fair value in the accompanying balance
sheets. Such assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities,
accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable (including income taxes payable and accrued
expenses). Additionally, the following tables provide fair value measurement information for our
marketable securities and deferred compensation fund investment assets as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
Amount |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities |
|
$ |
52,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,651,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred Compensation
Funding |
|
$ |
9,157,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,157,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,157,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
Amount |
|
Total Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities |
|
$ |
49,414,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,414,000 |
|
|
$ |
49,414,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred Compensation
Funding |
|
$ |
8,287,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,287,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,287,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
For the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2009, the other income- investment and interest
caption on our consolidated statements of income includes an unrealized loss from marketable
securities of $272,000 and an unrealized gain from marketable securities of $373,000, respectively.
There were no unrealized gains or losses reported in our consolidated statements of income in
either of the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, reported within the
other income-
investment and interest caption are realized gains from our marketable securities of $185,000 in
the
-8-
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Estimated |
June 30, 2009 |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
Type of security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities |
|
$ |
51,132,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,519,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,651,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Estimated |
December 31, 2008 |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
Type of security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities |
|
$ |
48,268,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,414,000 |
|
We adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008 and elected the fair value option contained
therein for all marketable securities purchased since such adoption. Management elected the fair
value option for its marketable securities because it views such investment securities as highly
liquid and available to be drawn upon for working capital purposes making them essentially the same
as its cash and cash equivalents.
Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (which replaces SFAS No.
141) and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in accounting for our goodwill and
other identifiable intangible assets. SFAS No. 141(R) addresses the initial recognition and
measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS No.
142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a
business combination, whether acquired individually or with a group of other assets, and the
accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition.
The following table sets forth the amounts of our identifiable intangible assets subject to
amortization, which were acquired in the Summit and CES acquisitions, and the amortization expense
recognized thereon for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2009. The CES valuation
represents a preliminary allocation and is subject to revision, although we do not believe the
final allocation will have a material impact on the amount recorded at this time.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
Amortization Expense |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
Six Months |
|
Customer Relationships |
|
$ |
12,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
368,000 |
|
|
$ |
607,000 |
|
Non-compete Agreements |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,900,000 |
|
|
$ |
393,000 |
|
|
$ |
657,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9-
The customer relationships have a weighted-average amortization period of seven years and the
non-compete agreements have a weighted-average amortization period of eight years. The following
table sets forth the estimated amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization for the
remaining six months in our 2009 fiscal year and the following four fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
Non-Compete |
|
|
Period/Year |
|
Relationships |
|
Agreements |
|
Total |
July 1 to
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
864,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
914,000 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,729,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,829,000 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,729,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,829,000 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
1,729,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,829,000 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
1,410,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,510,000 |
|
The following table sets forth the amount of goodwill as of June 30, 2009 which is subject to
impairment testing, rather than amortization. The goodwill associated with the CES acquisition is
deductible for tax purposes over a fifteen year period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CES |
|
Summit |
|
All other |
|
Total |
$2,034,000 |
|
$ |
13,408,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,612,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,054,000 |
|
The following table sets forth by reportable operating segment, as described in Note 5
herein, the amounts of goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Amount |
|
Food |
|
$ |
2,380,000 |
|
Housekeeping |
|
|
14,674,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,054,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Other Contingencies
We have a $33,000,000 bank line of credit on which we may draw to meet short-term liquidity
requirements in excess of internally generated cash flow. Amounts drawn under the line of credit
are payable upon demand. At June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the line of credit.
However, at such date, we had outstanding a $31,925,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit which
relates to payment obligations under our insurance programs. As a result of the letter of credit
issued, the amount available under the line of credit was reduced by $31,925,000 at June 30, 2009.
The line of credit requires us to satisfy two financial covenants. We are in compliance with the
financial covenants at June 30, 2009 and expect to continue to remain in compliance with such
financial covenants. This line of credit expires on June 30, 2010. We believe the line of credit
will be renewed at that time.
We provide our services in 47 states and are subject to numerous local taxing jurisdictions within
those states. Consequently, the taxability of our services is subject to various interpretations
within these jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of business, a jurisdiction may contest our
reporting positions with respect to the application of its tax code to our services, which may
result in additional tax liabilities.
-10-
We have tax matters with various taxing authorities. Because of the uncertainties related to both
the probable outcome and amount of probable assessment due, we are unable to make a reasonable
estimate of a liability. We do not expect the resolution of any of these matters, taken
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse affect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations based on our best estimate of the outcomes of such matters.
We are also subject to various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of
business. Some of these matters include payroll and employee-related matters and
examinations by governmental agencies. As we become aware of such claims and legal
actions, we provide accruals if the exposures are probable and estimable. If an adverse
outcome of such claims and legal actions is reasonably possible, we assess materiality and
provide such financial disclosure, as appropriate. We believe that these matters, taken
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse affect on our
financial position or results of operations.
Congress has enacted a number of major laws during the past decade that have significantly
altered, or threaten to alter, overall government reimbursement for nursing home services.
Because our clients revenues are generally highly reliant on Medicare and Medicaid
reimbursement funding rates and mechanisms, the overall effect of these laws and trends in
the long term care industry have affected and could adversely affect the liquidity of our
clients, resulting in their inability to make payments to us on agreed upon payment terms.
These factors, in addition to delays in payments from clients, have resulted in and could
continue to result in significant additional bad debts in the near future.
Note 5 Segment Information
Reportable Operating Segments
We manage and evaluate our operations in two reportable segments. The two reportable segments
are Housekeeping (housekeeping, laundry, linen and other services), and Food (food services).
Although both segments serve the same client base and share many operational similarities, they are
managed separately due to distinct differences in the type of service provided, as well as the
specialized expertise required of the professional management personnel responsible for delivering
the respective segments services. We consider the various services provided within Housekeeping to
be one reportable operating segment since such services are rendered pursuant to a single service
agreement and the delivery of such services is managed by the same management personnel.
Differences between the reportable segments operating results and other disclosed data and our
consolidated financial statements relate primarily to corporate level transactions, and the
recording of transactions at the reportable segment level which use methods other than generally
accepted accounting principles. Additionally, included in the differences between the reportable
segments operating results and other disclosed data are amounts attributable to our investment
holding company subsidiary. This subsidiary does not transact any business with the reportable
segments. Segment amounts reported are prior to any elimination entries made in consolidation.
-11-
Housekeeping provides services in Canada, although essentially all of its revenues and net income,
99% in both categories, are earned in one geographic area, the United States. Food provides
services solely in the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Housekeeping |
|
Food |
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
services |
|
services |
|
eliminations |
|
Total |
Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
131,484,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,440,000 |
|
|
$ |
(28,000 |
) |
|
$ |
170,896,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
11,754,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,007,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,054,000 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
12,707,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
119,952,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,592,000 |
|
|
$ |
374,000 |
|
|
$ |
147,918,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
11,227,000 |
|
|
$ |
701,000 |
|
|
$ |
(623,000 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
11,305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
256,936,000 |
|
|
$ |
74,244,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
331,305,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
25,620,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,763,000 |
|
|
$ |
(4,098,000 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
25,285,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
239,470,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,833,000 |
|
|
$ |
874,000 |
|
|
$ |
295,177,000 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
23,043,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,979,000 |
|
|
$ |
(2,567,000 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
22,455,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
represents primarily corporate office cost and related overhead, as well as
consolidated subsidiarys operations that are not allocated to the reportable segments. |
Total Revenues from Clients
The following revenues earned from clients differ from segment revenues reported above due to
the inclusion of adjustments used for segment reporting purposes by management. We earned total
revenues from clients in the following service categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Housekeeping services |
|
$ |
88,412,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,257,000 |
|
Laundry and linen services |
|
|
41,834,000 |
|
|
|
37,365,000 |
|
Food Services |
|
|
39,995,000 |
|
|
|
27,703,000 |
|
Maintenance services
and Other |
|
|
655,000 |
|
|
|
593,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
170,896,000 |
|
|
$ |
147,918,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Housekeeping services |
|
$ |
175,142,000 |
|
|
$ |
164,875,000 |
|
Laundry and linen services |
|
|
80,740,000 |
|
|
|
74,207,000 |
|
Food Services |
|
|
74,222,000 |
|
|
|
55,010,000 |
|
Maintenance services
and Other |
|
|
1,201,000 |
|
|
|
1,085,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,305,000 |
|
|
$ |
295,177,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Client
We have one client, a nursing home chain (Major Client), which accounted for the respective
percentages of our revenues as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Six months |
|
2nd quarter |
Total revenues |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Housekeeping |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Food |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Six months |
|
2nd quarter |
Total revenues |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Housekeeping |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Food |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Additionally, at both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, amounts due from such client represented
less than 1% of our accounts receivable balance. The loss of such client, or a significant
reduction in revenues from such client, would have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations of our two operating segments. In addition, if such client changes its payment terms it
would increase our accounts receivable balance and have a material adverse effect on our cash flows
and cash and cash equivalents.
Note 6 Earnings Per Common Share
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted earnings per common
share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,815,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
7,815,000 |
|
|
|
43,537,000 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
7,815,000 |
|
|
|
44,262,000 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,953,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
6,953,000 |
|
|
|
43,080,000 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
6,953,000 |
|
|
|
43,962,000 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,551,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
15,551,000 |
|
|
|
43,497,000 |
|
|
$ |
.36 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
671,000 |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
15,551,000 |
|
|
|
44,168,000 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per-share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,810,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
13,810,000 |
|
|
|
43,048,000 |
|
|
$ |
.32 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040,000 |
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
common share |
|
$ |
13,810,000 |
|
|
|
44,088,000 |
|
|
$ |
.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 371,000 and 367,000 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of
$20.89 per common share were outstanding during the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2008, respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share
because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common
shares, and therefore, would be antidilutive.
Options to purchase 356,000 and 360,000 shares of common stock at an average exercise price of
$20.89 per common share were outstanding during the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009, respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share
because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common
shares, and therefore, would be antidilutive.
Note 7 Dividends
We have paid regular quarterly cash dividends since the second quarter of 2003. During the six
month period ended June 30, 2009, we paid regular cash dividends totaling $15,214,000 as follows.
-14-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
2nd Quarter |
Cash dividend per common share |
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
Total cash dividends paid |
|
$ |
7,388,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,826,000 |
|
Record date |
|
February 6 |
|
April 24 |
Payment date |
|
February 20 |
|
May 15 |
On July 14, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend payment of $.19
per common share to be paid on August 7, 2009 to shareholders of record as of July 24, 2009.
Note 8 Share-Based Compensation
Stock Options
During the six month period ended June 30, 2009, the stock option activity under our 2002
Stock Option Plan, 1995 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for key employees, and 1996
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (collectively the Stock Option Plans), was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
(In Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
10.14 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
15.58 |
|
|
|
421,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
19.35 |
|
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
11.24 |
|
|
|
2,213,000 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
$ |
15,772,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,515,000 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
$ |
14,820,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Price Range |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$1.50 - 2.74 |
|
|
189,000 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
|
|
189,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
3.01 - 5.53 |
|
|
584,000 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
584,000 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
9.10 - 9.10 |
|
|
332,000 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
9.10 |
|
|
|
332,000 |
|
|
|
9.10 |
|
13.81 -15.58 |
|
|
753,000 |
|
|
|
5.91 |
|
|
|
14.78 |
|
|
|
339,000 |
|
|
|
13.81 |
|
$20.89 -20.89 |
|
|
355,000 |
|
|
|
8.51 |
|
|
|
20.89 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
20.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,213,000 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
$ |
11.24 |
|
|
|
1,515,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information pertaining to option activity during the six month periods ended June 30, 2009
and June 30, 2008 was as follows:
-15-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June |
|
June |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2008 |
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted: |
|
$ |
1,545,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,237,000 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vested: |
|
$ |
447,000 |
|
|
$ |
-0- |
|
Total pre-tax intrinsic value of stock options exercised: |
|
$ |
967,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,505,000 |
|
Total pre-tax share-based compensation expense charged
against income: |
|
$ |
354,000 |
|
|
$ |
224,000 |
|
Total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested
options: |
|
$ |
2,793,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,013,000 |
|
Under our Stock Option Plans at June 30, 2009, in addition to the 2,213,000 shares issuable
pursuant to outstanding option grants, an additional 2,002,000 shares of our Common Stock are
available for future grants. Options outstanding and exercisable were granted at stock option
prices which were not less than the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date the options
were granted and no option has a term in excess of ten years. Additionally, with the exception of
the options granted in 2009 and 2008, options became vested and exercisable either on the date of
grant or commencing six months after the option grant date. The options granted in 2009 and 2008
become vested and exercisable ratably over a five year period on each yearly anniversary date of
the option grant.
At June 30, 2009, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested options, as
reported above, was expected to be recognized through the fourth quarter of 2013 for the options
granted in 2009 and the fourth quarter of 2012 for the options granted in 2008. The fair value of
options granted in 2009 and 2008 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
Weighted average expected life in years |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Total pre-tax share-based compensation expense charged against income for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 for options granted under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (ESPP) was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
2nd Quarter |
|
Six Months |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
Six Months |
$65,000
|
|
$145,000
|
|
$91,000
|
|
$158,000 |
It is estimated, at this time, that the expense attributable to such share-based payments in each
of the subsequent quarters of 2009 will approximate the average of the amounts recorded in the 2009
first and second quarter. However, such future expense related to our ESPP will be impacted by, and
be dependent on the change in our stock price over the remaining period up to the December 31, 2009
measurement date.
Such expense was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
-16-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
Six Months |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
Weighted average expected life (in years) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
Six Months |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
Weighted average expected life (in years) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
We may issue new common stock or re-issue common stock from treasury to satisfy our obligations
under any of our share-based compensation plans.
Note 9 Related Party Transactions
One of our directors, as well as the brother of an officer and director (collectively Related
Parties), have separate ownership interests in several different client facilities which have
entered into service agreements with us. During the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June
30, 2008, the service agreements with the client facilities in which the Related Parties have
ownership interests resulted in aggregate revenues of $2,719,000 and $2,609,000, respectively. At
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, accounts and notes receivable from such facilities of
$1,793,000 (net of reserves of $926,000) and $1,837,000 (net of reserves of $739,000),
respectively, are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Another of our directors is a member of a law firm which was retained by us. During the six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, fees received from us by such firm did not exceed
$100,000 in either period. Additionally, such fees did not exceed, in either period, 5% of such
firms revenues.
Note 10 Income Taxes
We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions
requiring recognition in our financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years
ended December 31, 2005 through 2008, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major
tax jurisdictions as of June 30, 2009.
-17-
We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any
such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the
event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the
financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.
Note 11 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB Statement 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) was
issued. SFAS 141R replaces SFAS 141. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer of a business to
recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value. SFAS 141R also requires
transactions costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred. SFAS
141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on
or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008. The effective date, as well as our adoption date, for the pronouncement was
January 1, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2008 the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3), which amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142. This pronouncement requires enhanced
disclosures concerning a companys treatment of costs incurred to renew or extend the term
of a recognized intangible asset. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We have determined that the standard
will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles
to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the
U.S. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We currently adhere to the
hierarchy of GAAP as presented in SFAS No. 162, and therefore our adoption did not have an
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, which establishes general
standards for accounting for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. The pronouncement requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, whether that date represents the
date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. SFAS 165 is
effective with interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. Once
adopted, we will assess the impact of SFAS 165 on our consolidated financial statement
disclosures.
-18-
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This report and documents incorporated by reference into this report contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), as amended, which are not
historical facts but rather based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our
business and industry, our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as believes, anticipates,
plans, expects, will, goal, and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. The inclusion of forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a
representation by us that any of our plans will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. Such forward looking information is also subject to various risks and
uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks arising from our
providing services exclusively to the health care industry, primarily providers of long-term care;
credit and collection risks associated with this industry; one client accounting for approximately
13% of revenues in the six month period ended June 30, 2009 (see Note 5 Major Client in the
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements); risks associated with our acquisition of
Contract Environmental Services, Inc., including integration risks and costs, or such business not
achieving expected financial results or synergies or failure to otherwise perform as expected; our
claims experience related to workers compensation and general liability insurance; the effects of
changes in, or interpretations of laws and regulations governing the industry, our workforce and
services provided, including state and local regulations pertaining to the taxability of our
services; and the risk factors described in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008 in Part I
under Government Regulation of Clients, Competition, Service Agreements/Collections, and
under Item IA Risk Factors. Many of our clients revenues are highly contingent on Medicare and
Medicaid reimbursement funding rates, which Congress has affected through the enactment of a number
of major laws during the past decade. These laws have significantly altered, or threatened to
alter, overall government reimbursement funding rates and mechanisms. The overall effect of these
laws and trends in the long-term care industry have affected and could adversely affect the
liquidity of our clients, resulting in their inability to make payments to us on agreed upon
payment terms. These factors, in addition to delays in payments from clients, have
resulted in, and could continue to result in, significant additional bad debts in the near future.
Additionally, our operating results would be adversely affected if unexpected increases in the
costs of labor and labor related costs, materials, supplies and equipment used in performing
services could not be passed on to our clients.
In addition, we believe that to improve our financial performance we must continue to obtain
service agreements with new clients, provide new services to existing clients, achieve modest price
increases on current service agreements with existing clients and maintain internal cost reduction
strategies at our various operational levels. Furthermore, we believe that our ability to sustain
the internal development of managerial personnel is an important factor impacting future operating
results and successfully executing projected growth strategies.
-19-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion is intended to provide the reader with information that will be
helpful in understanding our financial statements including the changes in certain key items in
comparing financial statements period to period. We also intend to provide the primary factors that
accounted for those changes, as well as a summary of how certain accounting principles affect our
financial statements. In addition, we are providing information about the financial results of our
two operating segments to further assist in understanding how these segments and their results
affect our consolidated results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with
our financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the periods then ended and
the notes accompanying those financial statements.
Overview
We provide housekeeping, laundry, linen, facility maintenance and food services to the health
care industry, including nursing homes, retirement complexes, rehabilitation centers and hospitals
located throughout the United States.
We believe that we are the largest provider of housekeeping and laundry services to the long-term
care industry in the United States, rendering such services to approximately 2,300 facilities in 47
states as of June 30, 2009. Although we do not directly participate in any government reimbursement
programs, our clients reimbursements are subject to government regulation. Therefore, they are
directly affected by any legislation relating to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement programs.
We provide our services primarily pursuant to full service agreements with our clients. In such
agreements, we are responsible for the management and hourly employees located at our clients
facilities. We also provide services on the basis of a management-only agreement for a very limited
number of clients. Our agreements with clients typically provide for a one year service term,
cancelable by either party upon 30 to 90 days notice after the initial 90-day period.
We are organized into two reportable segments; housekeeping, laundry, linen and facility
maintenance (Housekeeping), and food services (Food). Housekeeping is being provided at all
of our approximately 2,300 client facilities, generating approximately 78% or $257,083,000 of total
consolidated revenues in the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Food is being provided to
approximately 325 client facilities and contributed approximately 22% or $74,222,000 of 2009 six
month period total consolidated revenues.
The services provided by Housekeeping consist primarily of the cleaning, disinfecting and
sanitizing of patient rooms and common areas of a clients facility, as well as the laundering and
processing of the personal clothing belonging to the facilitys patients. Also within the scope of
this segments service is the laundering and processing of the bed linens, uniforms and other
assorted linen items utilized by a client facility.
Food consists of providing for the development of a menu that meets the patients dietary needs,
and the purchasing and preparing of the food for delivery to the patients.
As of June 30, 2009, we operate one wholly-owned subsidiary, Huntingdon Holdings, Inc.
(Huntingdon). Huntingdon invests our cash and cash equivalents, as well as managing our
-20-
portfolio of marketable securities. On March 1, 2009, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary HCSG
Supply, Inc. (Supply) for approximately $1,100,000, financed principally through our acceptance
of a secured promissory note which is recorded in our notes receivable in the accompanying June 30,
2009 balance sheet. As a result of the Supply sale, we recorded an immaterial gain in our
consolidated statement of income for the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
On April 30, 2009, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement to acquire essentially all of the assets
of Contract Environmental Services, Inc (CES), a South Carolina based corporation which is a
provider of professional housekeeping, laundry and dietary services to long-term care and related
facilities. We believe the acquisition of CES expands and compliments our position of being the
largest provider of such services to long-term care and related facilities in the United States.
The aggregate consideration, subject to future revision, was approximately $13,800,000 consisting
of approximately: (i) $4,600,000 in cash, (ii) a current issuance of approximately 66,000 shares of
our common stock (valued at approximately $1,183,000) and a future issuance of approximately
265,000 shares (valued at approximately $3,311,000) contingent upon the achievement of certain
financial targets, and (iii) the repayment of approximately $4,700,000 of certain debt obligations
of CES. The allocation of such consideration has resulted in our recording in the accompanying June
30, 2009 consolidated balance sheets of the following assets; (i) approximately $8,900,000
consisting primarily of accounts receivable, (ii) $5,400,000 of amortizable intangible assets, and
(iii) $2,000,000 of goodwill. Additionally, pursuant to the transaction we assumed approximately
$2,500,000 of certain other liabilities of the seller.
Consolidated Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage which certain items
bear to consolidated revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relation to Consolidated Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services provided |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
Selling, general and
administration |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Investment and interest income |
|
|
.7 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the factors noted in the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements
included in this report, we anticipate our financial performance for the remainder of 2009 may be
comparable to the six month period ended June 30, 2009 percentages presented in the above table as
they relate to consolidated revenues.
Housekeeping is our largest and core reportable segment, representing approximately 78% of consolidated revenues in each of the quarter and six month period ended June 30,
2009. Food revenues represented approximately 22% of consolidated
revenues in each of such periods.
-21-
Although there can be no assurance thereof, we believe that for the remainder of 2009 each of
Housekeepings and Foods revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, will remain
approximately the same as their respective percentages noted above. Furthermore, we expect the
sources of growth for the remainder of 2009 for the respective operating segments will be primarily
the same as historically experienced. Accordingly, although there can be no assurance thereof, the
growth in Food is expected to come from our current Housekeeping client base, while growth in
Housekeeping is expected to come primarily from obtaining new clients.
2009 Second Quarter Compared with 2008 Second Quarter
The following table sets forth 2009 second quarter income statement key components that we use
to evaluate our financial performance on a consolidated and reportable segment basis, as well as
the percentage changes of each compared to 2008 second quarter amounts. The differences between the
reportable segments operating results and other disclosed data and our consolidated financial
statements relate primarily to corporate level transactions and recording of transactions at the
reportable segment level which use methods other than generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Corporate and |
|
Housekeeping |
|
Food |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
increase |
|
eliminations |
|
Amount |
|
% increase |
|
Amount |
|
% incrrease |
Revenues |
|
$ |
170,896,000 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(28,000 |
) |
|
$ |
131,484,000 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
39,440,000 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
% |
Cost of services provided |
|
|
145,830,000 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(11,333,000 |
) |
|
|
119,730,000 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
37,433,000 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense |
|
|
13,516,000 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
13,516,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest income |
|
|
1,157,000 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
1,157,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
12,707,000 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,054,000 |
) |
|
$ |
11,754,000 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,007,000 |
|
|
|
186.4 |
% |
Revenues
Consolidated
Consolidated revenues increased 15.5% to $170,896,000 in the 2009 second quarter compared to
$147,918,000 in the 2008 second quarter as a result of the factors discussed below under Reportable
Segments.
Our Major Client accounted for 13% and 15%, respectively of consolidated revenues in the three
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.The loss of such client would have a material
adverse effect on the results of operations of our two operating segments. In addition, if such
Major Client changes its payment terms it would increase our accounts receivable balance and have a
material adverse effect on our cash flows and cash and cash equivalents.
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 9.6% net growth in reportable segment revenues resulted primarily from revenues
attributable to service agreements entered into with new clients. CES accounted for approximately
2.7% of the second quarters net growth in reportable segment revenues.
Foods 42.9% net growth in reportable segment revenues is primarily a result of
-22-
providing this service to existing Housekeeping clients. CES accounted for approximately 16.2% of
such quarters net growth in reportable segment revenues.
We derived 13% and 11%, respectively, of Housekeeping and Foods 2009 second quarter revenues
from our Major Client.
Costs of services provided
Consolidated
Cost of services provided, on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of consolidated revenues
for the 2009 second quarter decreased to 85.3 % from 85.9 % in the corresponding 2008 quarter. The
following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key indicators that
we manage on a consolidated basis in evaluating our financial performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incr |
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2009 % |
|
2008 % |
|
(Decr)% |
Bad debt provision |
|
|
.4 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
Workers compensation and general
liability insurance |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
The increase in bad debt provision resulted primarily from unfavorable collection experience.
The slight decrease in workers compensation and general liability insurance is primarily a result
of favorable claims experience during the quarter.
Reportable Segments
Cost of services provided for Housekeeping, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, for the
2009 second quarter increased to 91.1% from 90.6% in the corresponding 2008 quarter. Cost of
services provided for Food, as a percentage of Food revenues, for the 2009 second quarter decreased
to 94.9% from 97.5% in the corresponding 2008 quarter.
The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key indicators,
as a percentage of the respective segments revenues, which we manage on a reportable segment basis
in evaluating our financial performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2009 % |
|
2008 % |
|
Incr (Decr) % |
Housekeeping labor and other labor costs |
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
Housekeeping supplies |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
.4 |
|
Food labor and other labor costs |
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Food supplies |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
The increase in Housekeeping labor and other labor costs, as percentage of Housekeeping revenues,
resulted primarily from inefficiencies in managing these costs. The increase in Housekeeping
supplies resulted primarily from vendor price increases.
The decrease in Food labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Food revenues, resulted
from efficiencies achieved in managing such costs at the facility level. The decrease in Food
supplies, as a percentage of Food revenues, resulted primarily from more efficient use of these
supplies at the facility level, as well as improved purchasing programs.
-23-
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in the 2009 second quarter to 7.9%, as
a percentage of consolidated revenues, compared to 6.8% in the 2008 second quarter. The increase is
primarily attributable to recognizing a net $766,000 increase change in compensation expense as a
result of the increase in market value of the investments held in our Deferred Compensation Fund
which was offset by the recording of such income as discussed below in Consolidated Investment and
Interest Income. Additionally, we incurred increased professional fees during the 2009 second
quarter in connection with our CES acquisition and other matters.
Consolidated Investment and Interest Income
Investment and interest income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to .7% in
the 2009 second quarter compared to .4% in the 2008 second quarter. The net increase is primarily
attributable to increase in market value of the investments held in our Deferred Compensation Fund
which was offset somewhat by reduced interest earned on investments.
Income before Income Taxes
Consolidated
As a result of the discussion above related to revenues and expenses, consolidated income
before income taxes for the 2009 second quarter decreased slightly to 7.5 %, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, compared to 7.6% in the 2008 second quarter.
Reportable Segments
Housekeeping realized a 4.7% increase in income before income taxes in comparing the three
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. CES contributed approximately 3.8% of the
quarters increase in income before income taxes with the remaining income before income taxes
improvement being attributable to the gross profit earned on Housekeepings 6.9% organic revenue
growth.
Foods 2009 second quarter income before income taxes increased 186% in comparing it to the 2008
second quarter. The increase is primarily attributable to the gross profit earned on the 26.7%
organic revenue growth, as well as efficiencies achieved in managing operations at the facility
level. CES contributed approximately 31.3% of the quarters increase in income before income taxes.
Consolidated Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for both of the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008 was 38.5%. Our 38.5% effective tax rate differs from the federal income tax statutory rate
principally because of the effect of state and local income taxes and estimated tax credits
available to the Company.
Consolidated Net Income
As a result of the matters discussed above, consolidated net income for the 2009 second
quarter remained essentially unchanged at 4.6%, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, compared
to 4.7% in the 2008 second quarter.
-24-
2009 Six Month Period Compared with 2008 Six Month Period
The following table sets forth for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 income statement
key components that we use to evaluate our financial performance on a consolidated and reportable
segment basis, as well as the percentage changes of each compared to the six month period ended
June 30, 2008 amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Corporate and |
|
Housekeeping |
|
Food |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
increase |
|
eliminations |
|
Amount |
|
% incr |
|
Amount |
|
% incr |
Revenues |
|
$ |
331,305,000 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
256,936,000 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
$ |
74,244,000 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
Cost of services provided |
|
|
283,722,000 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(18,075,000 |
) |
|
|
231,316,000 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
70,481,000 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense |
|
|
24,392,000 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
24,392,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and interest income |
|
|
2,094,000 |
|
|
|
130.2 |
|
|
|
2,094,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
25,285,000 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
(4,098,000 |
) |
|
$ |
25,620,000 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,763,000 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
% |
Revenues
Consolidated
Consolidated revenues increased 12.2% to $331,305,000 in the six month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to $295,177,000 in the same 2008 period as a result of the factors discussed below
under Reportable Segments.
Our Major Client accounted for 13% and 15%, respectively of consolidated revenues in the six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 7.3% net growth in reportable segment revenues resulted primarily from an
increase in revenues attributable to service agreements entered into with new clients. CES
accounted for approximately 1.3% of the six month periods net growth in reportable segment
revenues.
Foods 35.4% net growth in reportable segment revenues is primarily a result of providing this
service to existing Housekeeping clients. CES accounted for approximately 8.2% of the six month
periods net growth in reportable segment revenues.
We derived 13% and 12%, respectively, of Housekeeping and Foods 2009 six month periods revenues
from the Major Client.
Costs of services provided
Consolidated
Cost of services provided, on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of consolidated revenues
for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased to 85.6% from 85.7% in the corresponding
2008 period.
-25-
The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key indicators
that we manage on a consolidated basis in evaluating our financial performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incr |
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2009 % |
|
2008 % |
|
(Decr)% |
Bad debt provision |
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
Workers compensation and general
liability insurance |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
.7 |
|
The increase in bad debt provision resulted primarily from unfavorable collection experience.
The increase in workers compensation and general liability insurance is primarily due to
unfavorable claims experience during the six month period.
Reportable Segments
Cost of services provided for Housekeeping, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues, for the
six month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased to 90.0% from 90.4% in the corresponding 2008
period. Cost of services provided for Food, as a percentage of Food revenues, for the 2009 six
month period decreased to 94.9% from 96.4% in comparing it to the 2008 six month period.
The following table provides a comparison of the primary cost of services provided-key indicators,
as a percentage of the respective segments revenues, that we manage on a reportable segment basis
in evaluating our financial performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Services Provided-Key Indicators |
|
2009 % |
|
2008 % |
|
Incr (Decr) % |
Housekeeping labor and other labor costs |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
Housekeeping supplies |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
Food labor and other labor costs |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Food supplies |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
(.2 |
) |
The decrease in Housekeeping labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Housekeeping revenues,
resulted primarily from efficiencies achieved in managing these costs at the facility level. The
decrease in Housekeeping supplies resulted primarily from better management of these costs.
The decrease in Food labor and other labor costs, as a percentage of Food revenues, resulted from
efficiencies achieved in managing these costs at all operating levels. The decrease in Food segment
supplies, as a percentage of Food segment revenues, is a result of better management of these
supplies at the facility level and improved purchasing programs.
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense increased to 7.4%, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues in the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 7.0% in the 2008 six
month period. The increase is primarily attributable to the affect of recognizing a net $1,013,000
increase change in compensation expense as a result of the increase in market value of the
investments held in our Deferred Compensation Fund which was offset by the recording of such income
as discussed below in Consolidated Investment and Interest Income. Additionally, we incurred
increased professional fees associated with the CES acquisition and other matters.
-26-
Consolidated Investment and Interest Income
Investment and interest income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to .6% in
the 2009 six month period compared to .3% in the same 2008 period. The increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in the market value of investments held in our Deferred Compensation
Fund, and the interest earned, and realized and unrealized net gains on our marketable securities
portfolio.
Income before Income Taxes
Consolidated
As a result of the discussion above related to revenues and expenses, consolidated income
before income taxes for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 remained constant, in comparison
to the same 2008 period, at 7.6 %, as a percentage of consolidated revenues.
Reportable Segments
Housekeepings 11.2% increase in income before income taxes is primarily attributable to the
gross profit earned on the 6.0% increase in organic reportable segment revenues. CES contributed
approximately 1.9% of Housekeepings 2009 six month periods increase in income before income
taxes.
Foods income before income taxes increase of 90.1% on a reportable segment basis is primarily
attributable to the gross profit earned on the 27.2% increase in organic reportable segment
revenues and efficiencies achieved in managing operations at the facility level. CES contributed
approximately 11.1% of Foods 2009 six month periods increase in income before income taxes.
Consolidated Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for both of the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008
was 38.5%. Absent any significant change in federal, or state and local tax laws, we expect our
effective tax rate for the remainder of 2009 to approximate 38.5%. Our 38.5% effective tax rate
differs from the federal income tax statutory rate principally because of the effect of state and
local income taxes and estimated tax credits available to the Company.
Consolidated Net Income
As a result of the matters discussed above, consolidated net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 remained at 4.7%, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, compared to the six month
period ended June 30, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting standards generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We consider the three policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our financial
statements because their application places the most significant demands on our judgment.
Therefore, it should be noted that financial reporting results rely on estimating the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies and
-27-
estimates are described in the following paragraphs. For these estimates, we caution that future
events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Any such adjustments or revisions to estimates could result in material differences to previously
reported amounts.
The three policies discussed are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting
policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically
dictated by accounting standards generally accepted in the United States, with no need for our
judgment in their application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting another
available alternative would not produce a materially different result. See our audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which contain accounting policies and estimates and other disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (the Allowance) is established as losses are estimated to
have occurred through a provision for bad debts charged to earnings. The Allowance is evaluated
based on our periodic review of accounts and notes receivable and is inherently subjective as it
requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes
available.
We have had varying collection experience with respect to our accounts and notes receivable. When
contractual terms are not met, we generally encounter difficulty in collecting amounts due from
certain of our clients. Therefore, we have sometimes been required to extend the period of payment
for certain clients beyond contractual terms. These clients include those who have terminated
service agreements and slow payers experiencing financial difficulties. In making credit
evaluations, in addition to analyzing and anticipating, where possible, the specific cases
described above, we consider the general collection risks associated with trends in the long-term
care industry. We also establish credit limits, perform ongoing credit evaluations, and monitor
accounts to minimize the risk of loss.
In accordance with the risk of extending credit, we regularly evaluate our accounts and notes
receivable for impairment or loss of value and when appropriate, will provide in our Allowance for
such receivables. We generally follow a policy of reserving for receivables due from clients in
bankruptcy, clients with which we are in litigation for collection and other slow paying clients.
The reserve is based upon our estimates of ultimate collectibility. Correspondingly, once our
recovery of a receivable is determined through either litigation, bankruptcy proceedings or
negotiation to be less than the recorded amount on our balance sheet, we will charge-off the
applicable amount to the Allowance.
Our methodology for the Allowance is based upon a risk-based evaluation of accounts and notes
receivable associated with a clients ability to make payments. Such Allowance generally consists
of an initial amount established based upon criteria generally applied if and when a client account
files bankruptcy, is placed for collection/litigation and/or is considered to be pending
collection/litigation. The initial Allowance is adjusted either higher or lower when additional
information is available to permit a more accurate estimate of the collectibility of an account.
-28-
Summarized below for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008 are
the aggregate account balances for the three Allowance criteria noted above, net write-offs of
client accounts, bad debt provision and allowance for doubtful accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances of Clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Bankruptcy or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
In/Pending |
|
Net Write-Offs |
|
Bad Debt |
|
Allowance for |
Ended |
|
Collection/Litigation |
|
of Client Accounts |
|
Provision |
|
Doubtful Accounts |
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
10,334,000 |
|
|
$ |
714,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,450,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,950,000 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
8,417,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,304,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,234,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,214,000 |
|
At June 30, 2009, we identified accounts totaling $10,334,000 that require an Allowance based on
potential impairment or loss of value. An Allowance totaling $3,950,000 was provided for these
accounts at such date. Actual collections of these accounts could differ from that which we
currently estimate. If our actual collection experience is 5% less than our estimate, the related
increase to our Allowance would decrease net income by $196,000.
Notwithstanding our efforts to minimize credit risk exposure, our clients could be adversely
affected if future industry trends, as more fully discussed under Liquidity and Capital Resources
below, and as further described in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K in Part I under ''Risk
Factors, ''Government Regulation of Clients and ''Service Agreements/Collections, change in
such a manner as to negatively impact the cash flows of our clients. If our clients experience a
negative impact in their cash flows, it would have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Accrued Insurance Claims
We currently have a Paid Loss Retrospective Insurance Plan for general liability and workers
compensation insurance, which comprise approximately 29% of our liabilities at June 30, 2009. Our
accounting for this plan is affected by various uncertainties because we must make assumptions and
apply judgment to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not
reported as of the balance sheet date. We address these uncertainties by regularly evaluating our
claims pay-out experience, present value factor and other factors related to the nature of
specific claims in arriving at the basis for our accrued insurance claims estimate. Our evaluations
are based primarily on current information derived from reviewing our claims experience and
industry trends. In the event that our claims experience and/ or industry trends result in an
unfavorable change, it would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations and financial condition. Under these plans, predetermined loss limits are arranged with
an insurance company to limit both our per-occurrence cash outlay and annual insurance plan cost.
For workers compensation, we record a reserve based on the present value of future payments,
including an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, that are developed as a result of a
review of our historical data and open claims. The present value of the payout is determined by
applying an 8% discount factor against the estimated value of the claims over the estimated
remaining pay-out period. Reducing the discount factor by 1% would reduce net income by
-29-
approximately $41,000. Additionally, reducing the estimated payout period by six months would
result in an approximate $86,000 reduction in net income.
For general liability, we record a reserve for the estimated ultimate amounts to be paid for known
claims. The estimated ultimate reserve amount recorded is derived from the estimated claim reserves
provided by our insurance carrier reduced by an historical experience factor.
Asset Valuations and Review for Potential Impairment
We review our fixed assets, goodwill and other intangible assets at least annually or whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. This
review requires that we make assumptions regarding the value of these assets and the changes in
circumstances that would affect the carrying value of these assets. If such analysis indicates that
a possible impairment may exist, we are then required to estimate the fair value of the asset and,
as deemed appropriate, expense all or a portion of the asset. The determination of fair value
includes numerous uncertainties, such as the impact of competition on future value. We believe that
we have made reasonable estimates and judgments in determining whether our long-term assets have
been impaired; however, if there is a material change in the assumptions used in our determination
of fair value or if there is a material change in economic conditions or circumstances influencing
fair value, we could be required to recognize certain impairment charges in the future. As a result
of our most recent reviews, no changes in asset values were required.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $77,190,000 and
working capital of $174,571,000 compared to December 31, 2008 cash and cash equivalents, and
marketable securities of $86,915,000 and working capital of $177,573,000. We view our cash and cash
equivalents, and marketable securities as our principal measure of liquidity. Our current ratio at
June 30, 2009 decreased slightly to 6.7 to 1 compared to 7.1 to 1 at December 31, 2008. This
decrease resulted from the timing of payments for accrued payroll, accrued and withheld payroll
taxes, as well as the timing of payments for income taxes, which were offset by the increase in
accounts and notes receivable resulting from primarily from our 12.2% increase in revenues. On an
historical basis, our operations have generally produced consistent cash flow and have required
limited capital resources. We believe our current and near term cash flow positions will enable us
to fund our continued anticipated growth.
Operating Activities
The net cash provided by our operating activities was $15,063,000 for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009. The principal sources of net cash flows from operating activities for this
period were net income, non-cash charges to operations for bad debt provisions, and depreciation
and amortization. Additionally, operating activities cash flows increased by $1,599,000 as a
result of the timing of payments for income taxes. The operating activity that used the largest
amount of cash during the six month period ended June 30, 2009 was a net increase of $13,845,000 in
accounts and notes receivable and long-term notes receivable resulting primarily from the 12.2%
growth in the Companys 2009 six month period consolidated revenues. Additionally, the increase was impacted by
receivables assumed in the CES acquisition, as well as the timing of collections.
-30-
Investing Activities
Our principal use of cash in investing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2009
was $4,613,000 expended for the CES acquisition. Additionally, we expended $3,329,000 and
$1,064,000, respectively, for the net purchases of marketable securities, and of housekeeping
equipment, computer software and equipment, and laundry equipment installations. Under our current
plans, which are subject to revision upon further review, it is our intention to spend an aggregate
of $500,000 to $1,000,000 during the remainder of 2009 for such capital expenditures.
Financing Activities
In connection with the CES acquisition, we made cash payments of $4,718,000 for the repayment
of CES debt assumed in the transaction.
We have paid regular quarterly cash dividends since the second quarter of 2003. During the six
month period ended June 30, 2009 we paid regular cash dividends totaling $15,214,000 as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
2nd Quarter |
Cash dividend per common share |
|
$ |
.17 |
|
|
$ |
.18 |
|
Total cash dividends paid |
|
$ |
7,388,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,826,000 |
|
Record date |
|
February 6 |
|
April 24 |
Payment date |
|
February 20 |
|
May 15 |
Additionally, on July 14, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend of $.19 per
common share to be paid on August 7, 2009 to shareholders of record as of July 24, 2009.
Our Board of Directors reviews our dividend policy on a quarterly basis. Although there can be no
assurance that we will continue to pay dividends or the amount of the dividend, we expect to
continue to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend. In connection with the establishment of our
dividend policy, we adopted a Dividend Reinvestment Plan in 2003.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2009, we received proceeds of $423,000 from the exercise
of stock options by employees and directors. Additionally, we recognized an income tax liability of
$236,000 from equity compensation plans transactions.
Line of Credit
We have a $33,000,000 bank line of credit on which we may draw to meet short-term liquidity
requirements in excess of internally generated cash flow. Amounts drawn under the line of credit
are payable upon demand. At June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the line. However, at
such date, we had outstanding a $31,925,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit which relates to
payment obligations under our insurance programs. As a result of the letter of credit issued, the
amount available under the line of credit was reduced by $31,925,000 at June 30, 2009.
The line of credit requires us to satisfy two financial covenants. Such covenants, and their
respective status at June 30, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
Covenant Description and Requirement
|
|
Status at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Commitment coverage ratio: cash and cash
equivalents must equal or exceed outstanding
obligations under the line by a multiple of 2
|
|
Commitment coverage is 2.4 |
|
|
|
Tangible net worth: must exceed $160,217,000
|
|
Tangible net worth is $181,870,000 |
As noted above, we complied with the financial covenants at June 30, 2009 and expect to continue to
remain in compliance with such financial covenants. This line of credit expires on June 30, 2010.
We believe the line of credit will be renewed at that time.
-31-
Accounts and Notes Receivable
We expend considerable effort to collect the amounts due for our services on the terms agreed
upon with our clients. Many of our clients participate in programs funded by federal and state
governmental agencies which historically have encountered delays in making payments to its program
participants. Congress has enacted a number of laws during the past decade that have significantly
altered, or may alter, overall government reimbursement for nursing home services. Because our
clients revenues are generally reliant on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement funding rates and
mechanisms, the overall effect of these laws and trends in the long term care industry have
affected and could adversely affect the liquidity of our clients, resulting in their inability to
make payments to us on agreed upon payment terms. These factors, in addition to delays in payments
from clients, have resulted in and could continue to result in significant additional bad debts in
the near future. Whenever possible, when a client falls behind in making agreed-upon payments, we
convert the unpaid accounts receivable to interest bearing promissory notes. The promissory notes
receivable provide a means by which to further evidence the amounts owed and provide a definitive
repayment plan and therefore may ultimately enhance our ability to collect the amounts due. At June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $12,414,000 and $6,418,000, net of reserves, respectively,
of such promissory notes outstanding. Additionally, we consider restructuring service agreements
from full service to management-only service in the case of certain clients experiencing financial
difficulties. We believe that such restructurings may provide us with a means to maintain a
relationship with the client while at the same time minimizing collection exposure.
As a result of the current economic crisis, many states have significant budget deficits.
State Medicaid programs are experiencing increased demand, and with lower revenues than
projected, they have fewer resources to support their Medicaid programs. As a result,
some state Medicaid programs are reconsidering previously approved increases in nursing
home reimbursement or are considering delaying those increases. A few states have
indicated it is possible they will run out of cash to pay Medicaid providers, including
nursing homes. Any of these changes would adversely affect the liquidity of our clients,
resulting in their inability to make payments to us as agreed upon. Congress has enacted
major economic stimulus legislation which may help to counter the impact of the economic
crisis on state budgets. The legislation includes the temporary provision of additional
federal matching funds to help states maintain their Medicaid programs. Given the
volatility of the economic environment, it is difficult to predict the impact of this
legislation on our clients liquidity and their ability to make payments to us as agreed.
We have had varying collection experience with respect to our accounts and notes receivable.
When contractual terms are not met, we generally encounter difficulty in collecting amounts due
-32-
from certain of our clients. Therefore, we have sometimes been required to extend the period of
payment for certain clients beyond contractual terms. These clients include those who have
terminated service agreements and slow payers experiencing financial difficulties. In order to
provide for these collection problems and the general risk associated with the granting of credit
terms, we have recorded bad debt provisions (in an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts) of $1,450,000
in the six month period ended June 30, 2009 and $850,000 in the six month period ended June 30,
2008. These provisions represent approximately .5% and .3%, as a percentage of total revenues for
such respective periods. In making our credit evaluations, in addition to analyzing and
anticipating, where possible, the specific cases described above, we consider the general
collection risk associated with trends in the long-term care industry. We also establish credit
limits, perform ongoing credit evaluation and monitor accounts to minimize the risk of loss.
Notwithstanding our efforts to minimize credit risk exposure, our clients could be adversely
affected if future industry trends change in such a manner as to negatively impact their cash
flows. If our clients experience a negative impact in their cash flows, it would have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
At June 30, 2009, amounts due from our Major Client represented less than 1% of our accounts
receivable balance. However, if such client changes its payments terms, it would increase our
accounts receivable balance and have a material adverse affect on our cash flows and cash and cash
equivalents.
Insurance Programs
We have a Paid Loss Retrospective Insurance Plan for general liability and workers
compensation insurance. Under these plans, pre-determined loss limits are arranged with an
insurance company to limit both our per-occurrence cash outlay and annual insurance plan cost.
For workers compensation, we record a reserve based on the present value of future payments,
including an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, that are developed as a result of a
review of our historical data and open claims. The present value of the payout is determined by
applying an 8% discount factor against the estimated value of the claims over the estimated
remaining pay-out period.
For general liability, we record a reserve for the estimated ultimate amounts to be paid for known
claims. The estimated ultimate reserve amount recorded is derived from the estimated claim reserves
provided by our insurance carrier reduced by an historical experience factor.
We regularly evaluate our claims pay-out experience, present value factor and other factors
related to the nature of specific claims in arriving at the basis for our accrued insurance claims
estimate. Our evaluation is based primarily on current information derived from reviewing our
claims experience and industry trends. In the event that our claims experience and/ or industry
trends result in an unfavorable change, it would have an adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Capital Expenditures
The level of capital expenditures is generally dependent on the number of new clients
obtained. Such capital expenditures primarily consist of housekeeping equipment purchases,
laundry and linen equipment installations, and computer hardware and software. Although we have no
specific material commitments for capital expenditures through the end of calendar year
-33-
2009, we estimate that for the remainder of 2009 we will have capital expenditures of approximately $500,000
to $1,000,000 in connection with housekeeping equipment purchases and laundry and linen equipment
installations in our clients facilities, as well as expenditures relating to internal data
processing hardware and software requirements. We believe that our cash from operations, existing
cash and cash equivalents balance and credit line will be adequate for the foreseeable future to
satisfy the needs of our operations and to fund our anticipated growth. However, should these
sources not be sufficient, we would, if necessary, seek to obtain necessary working capital from
such sources as long-term debt or equity financing.
Material Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than our irrevocable standby letter
of credit previously discussed.
Effects of Inflation
Although there can be no assurance thereof, we believe that in most instances we will be able
to recover increases in costs attributable to inflation by passing such cost increases through to
our clients.
-34-
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Management does not believe that there is any material market risk exposure with respect to
derivative or other financial instruments that would require disclosure under this item.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act), such as this Form 10-Q, is reported in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) rules. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Based on their evaluation as of June 30, 2009, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b), our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believe our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act 13a-15(e) are effective.
In connection with the evaluation pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) of our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) by our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, no changes during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, were identified that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Certifications
Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer regarding,
among other items, disclosure controls and procedures are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q.
-35-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
Not Applicable
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
ITEM 3. Defaults under Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 19, 2009. The results were as follows.
(1) All of managements nominees for directors received the requisite plurality of the votes
cast by the shareholders and will hold office until their successors are elected and qualified
(there being no opposition nominee):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares voted |
|
|
Director |
|
FOR |
|
Withheld |
Daniel P. McCartney |
|
|
26,636,000 |
|
|
|
15,168,000 |
|
Joseph F. McCartney |
|
|
19,512,000 |
|
|
|
22,292,000 |
|
Robert L. Frome |
|
|
25,415,000 |
|
|
|
16,389,000 |
|
Thomas A. Cook |
|
|
25,105,000 |
|
|
|
16,699,000 |
|
Robert J. Moss |
|
|
29,782,000 |
|
|
|
12,021,000 |
|
John M. Briggs |
|
|
38,228,000 |
|
|
|
3,575,000 |
|
Dino D. Ottaviano |
|
|
40,892,000 |
|
|
|
912,000 |
|
(2) Proposal to approve and ratify selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent
certified public accountants of the Company for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was
approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Voted |
|
Shares Voted |
|
Shares |
|
Broker |
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAINING |
|
Non-votes |
41,366,000
|
|
375,000
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
ITEM 5. Other Information.
a) None
-36-
ITEM 6. Exhibits
a) Exhibits -
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 |
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 |
-37-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant had duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
July 22, 2009 |
/s/ Daniel P. McCartney
|
|
Date |
DANIEL P. McCARTNEY, |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2009 |
/s/ Richard W. Hudson
|
|
Date |
RICHARD W. HUDSON, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|
|
-38-