e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
.
Commission file number 0-15341
Donegal Group Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-2424711 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1195 River Road, P.O. Box 302, Marietta, PA 17547
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(717) 426-1931
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest
practicable date: 19,965,942 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
5,576,775 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding on July 30, 2010.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity, at amortized cost |
|
$ |
68,000,766 |
|
|
$ |
73,807,126 |
|
Available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
536,086,968 |
|
|
|
517,703,672 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
14,136,602 |
|
|
|
9,914,626 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
9,142,992 |
|
|
|
9,309,347 |
|
Short-term investments, at cost, which
approximates fair value |
|
|
44,721,825 |
|
|
|
56,100,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
672,089,153 |
|
|
|
666,835,186 |
|
Cash |
|
|
10,123,179 |
|
|
|
12,923,898 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
6,435,842 |
|
|
|
6,202,710 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
70,110,729 |
|
|
|
61,187,021 |
|
Reinsurance receivable |
|
|
93,795,397 |
|
|
|
84,670,009 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
33,873,125 |
|
|
|
32,844,179 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
4,254,403 |
|
|
|
5,086,949 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
62,141,500 |
|
|
|
56,040,728 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
6,440,764 |
|
|
|
6,592,223 |
|
Accounts receivable securities |
|
|
2,587,399 |
|
|
|
588,292 |
|
Federal income taxes recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,047 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,965,582 |
|
|
|
1,967,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
963,817,073 |
|
|
$ |
935,601,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
276,230,422 |
|
|
$ |
263,598,844 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
258,837,434 |
|
|
|
241,821,419 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9,279,023 |
|
|
|
10,578,695 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
3,256,349 |
|
|
|
2,561,426 |
|
Federal income taxes payable |
|
|
655,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,798,378 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
15,465,000 |
|
|
|
15,465,000 |
|
Accounts payable securities |
|
|
7,244,783 |
|
|
|
6,828,873 |
|
Due to affiliate |
|
|
2,043,935 |
|
|
|
3,813,294 |
|
Drafts payable |
|
|
1,324,145 |
|
|
|
884,993 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,601,958 |
|
|
|
1,745,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
575,938,715 |
|
|
|
550,096,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, authorized
2,000,000 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
30,000,000 shares, issued 20,615,840 and 20,569,930
shares and outstanding 19,953,539 and 19,917,331 shares |
|
|
206,158 |
|
|
|
205,700 |
|
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
10,000,000 shares, issued 5,649,240 shares and
outstanding 5,576,775 shares |
|
|
56,492 |
|
|
|
56,492 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
165,398,461 |
|
|
|
164,585,214 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
17,628,498 |
|
|
|
15,007,044 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
213,838,682 |
|
|
|
214,755,495 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(9,249,933 |
) |
|
|
(9,104,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
387,878,358 |
|
|
|
385,505,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
963,817,073 |
|
|
$ |
935,601,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
93,002,409 |
|
|
$ |
87,540,345 |
|
Investment income, net of investment expenses |
|
|
4,968,490 |
|
|
|
5,266,161 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
1,965,091 |
|
|
|
445,140 |
|
Lease income |
|
|
229,490 |
|
|
|
234,713 |
|
Installment payment fees |
|
|
1,359,874 |
|
|
|
1,308,620 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
101,525,354 |
|
|
|
94,823,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
68,509,616 |
|
|
|
61,903,131 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
16,146,000 |
|
|
|
14,634,000 |
|
Other underwriting expenses |
|
|
14,182,695 |
|
|
|
12,527,331 |
|
Policyholder dividends |
|
|
65,482 |
|
|
|
91,682 |
|
Interest |
|
|
168,935 |
|
|
|
198,467 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
581,750 |
|
|
|
335,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
99,654,478 |
|
|
|
89,689,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
1,870,876 |
|
|
|
5,133,528 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
131,148 |
|
|
|
745,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,739,728 |
|
|
$ |
4,387,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock basic |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,739,728 |
|
|
$ |
4,387,624 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding income during the period,
net of income tax |
|
|
4,383,766 |
|
|
|
1,413,555 |
|
Reclassification adjustment, net of income tax |
|
|
(1,296,960 |
) |
|
|
(289,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,086,806 |
|
|
|
1,124,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4,826,534 |
|
|
$ |
5,511,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
184,374,505 |
|
|
$ |
175,889,888 |
|
Investment income, net of investment expenses |
|
|
9,898,981 |
|
|
|
10,623,750 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
1,986,603 |
|
|
|
703,995 |
|
Lease income |
|
|
455,997 |
|
|
|
456,334 |
|
Installment payment fees |
|
|
2,660,116 |
|
|
|
2,608,376 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
199,376,202 |
|
|
|
190,325,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
136,491,102 |
|
|
|
127,852,296 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
32,161,000 |
|
|
|
29,367,000 |
|
Other underwriting expenses |
|
|
26,815,711 |
|
|
|
25,203,963 |
|
Policyholder dividends |
|
|
244,783 |
|
|
|
335,211 |
|
Interest |
|
|
353,693 |
|
|
|
1,403,245 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
1,163,499 |
|
|
|
817,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
197,229,788 |
|
|
|
184,979,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
2,146,414 |
|
|
|
5,345,783 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
171,928 |
|
|
|
788,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
|
$ |
4,557,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock basic |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
|
$ |
4,557,428 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding income during the period,
net of income tax |
|
|
3,932,612 |
|
|
|
5,920,430 |
|
Reclassification adjustment, net of income tax |
|
|
(1,311,158 |
) |
|
|
(457,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,621,454 |
|
|
|
5,462,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4,595,940 |
|
|
$ |
10,020,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
|
Class A Amount |
|
|
Class B Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
20,569,930 |
|
|
|
5,649,240 |
|
|
$ |
205,700 |
|
|
$ |
56,492 |
|
|
$ |
164,585,214 |
|
|
$ |
15,007,044 |
|
|
$ |
214,755,495 |
|
|
$ |
(9,104,246 |
) |
|
$ |
385,505,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock (stock
compensation plans) |
|
|
45,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,868,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,868,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145,687 |
) |
|
|
(145,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,621,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,621,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
20,615,840 |
|
|
|
5,649,240 |
|
|
$ |
206,158 |
|
|
$ |
56,492 |
|
|
$ |
165,398,461 |
|
|
$ |
17,628,498 |
|
|
$ |
213,838,682 |
|
|
$ |
(9,249,933 |
) |
|
$ |
387,878,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
|
$ |
4,557,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,257,660 |
|
|
|
1,322,211 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
(1,986,603 |
) |
|
|
(703,995 |
) |
Equity loss (income) |
|
|
197,545 |
|
|
|
(42,691 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses |
|
|
12,631,578 |
|
|
|
9,687,639 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
17,016,015 |
|
|
|
9,725,766 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
(8,923,708 |
) |
|
|
(5,052,587 |
) |
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(1,028,946 |
) |
|
|
(1,164,877 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(579,005 |
) |
|
|
78,709 |
|
Reinsurance receivable |
|
|
(9,125,388 |
) |
|
|
(5,047,189 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
(6,100,772 |
) |
|
|
(4,031,695 |
) |
Accrued investment income |
|
|
(233,132 |
) |
|
|
6,518 |
|
Due to affiliate |
|
|
(1,769,359 |
) |
|
|
(2,392,632 |
) |
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
694,923 |
|
|
|
2,051,245 |
|
Current income taxes |
|
|
1,318,713 |
|
|
|
2,451,699 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,299,672 |
) |
|
|
(4,220,349 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
297,926 |
|
|
|
384,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
2,367,775 |
|
|
|
3,052,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
4,342,261 |
|
|
|
7,609,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(80,020,763 |
) |
|
|
(72,564,308 |
) |
Purchases of equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
(11,014,460 |
) |
|
|
(13,404,392 |
) |
Maturity of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
5,612,123 |
|
|
|
18,252,970 |
|
Available for sale |
|
|
39,093,985 |
|
|
|
22,158,494 |
|
Sales of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
26,454,158 |
|
|
|
10,037,415 |
|
Sales of equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
6,765,783 |
|
|
|
13,070,887 |
|
Payments to Sheboygan policyholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,556,650 |
) |
Net increase in investment in affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
Net purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(390,737 |
) |
|
|
(666,968 |
) |
Net sales of short-term investments |
|
|
11,378,590 |
|
|
|
31,642,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(2,121,321 |
) |
|
|
2,919,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(5,666,605 |
) |
|
|
(5,400,717 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
790,633 |
|
|
|
720,816 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(145,687 |
) |
|
|
(198,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(5,021,659 |
) |
|
|
(4,878,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(2,800,719 |
) |
|
|
5,650,539 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
12,923,898 |
|
|
|
1,830,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
10,123,179 |
|
|
$ |
7,481,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period Interest |
|
$ |
337,677 |
|
|
$ |
481,430 |
|
Net cash received during period Taxes |
|
$ |
(600,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,751,090 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
DONEGAL GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1 Organization
Donegal Mutual Insurance Company (Donegal Mutual) organized us as a downstream insurance
holding company on August 26, 1986. Our six insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual conduct
business as the Donegal Insurance Group. The Donegal Insurance Group writes personal and commercial
lines of property and casualty insurance exclusively through a network of independent insurance
agents in 20 Mid-Atlantic, Midwestern, New England and Southeastern states. The personal lines
products consist primarily of homeowners and private passenger automobile policies. The commercial
lines products consist primarily of commercial automobile, commercial multi-peril and workers
compensation policies.
Our insurance subsidiaries are Atlantic States Insurance Company (Atlantic States), Southern
Insurance Company of Virginia (Southern), Le Mars Insurance Company (Le Mars), the Peninsula
Insurance Group (Peninsula), which consists of Peninsula Indemnity Company and The Peninsula
Insurance Company, and Sheboygan Falls Insurance Company (Sheboygan). We also own approximately
48% of the outstanding stock of Donegal Financial Services Corporation (DFSC), a unitary thrift
holding company that owns Province Bank FSB. Donegal Mutual owns the remaining approximately 52%
of the outstanding stock of DFSC.
At June 30, 2010, Donegal Mutual held approximately 42% of our outstanding Class A common
stock and approximately 75% of our outstanding Class B common stock.
Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual are parties to a pooling agreement under which each company
places all of its direct written business in the pool and both companies share the underwriting
results of the pool as provided in the pooling agreement, excluding certain reinsurance Donegal
Mutual assumes from our five other insurance subsidiaries. From July 1, 2000 through February 29,
2008, Atlantic States had a 70% share of the results of the pool, and Donegal Mutual had a 30%
share of the results of the pool. Donegal Mutual and Atlantic States amended the pooling
agreement effective March 1, 2008 to increase Atlantic States share of the results of the pool to
80% and to decrease Donegal Mutuals share of the results of the pool to 20% beginning on that
date. See Note 4 Reinsurance for more information regarding the pooling agreement.
On February 23, 2009, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program, pursuant
to which we may purchase up to 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock at prices prevailing
from time to time in the open market subject to the provisions of applicable SEC rules and in
privately negotiated transactions. We did not purchase any shares of our Class A common stock under
this program during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We purchased 9,702
and no shares of our Class A common stock under this program during the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. We have purchased a total of 17,371 shares of our Class A common stock
under this program through June 30, 2010.
In October 2009, Donegal Mutual consummated an affiliation with Southern Mutual Insurance
Company (Southern Mutual), pursuant to which Donegal Mutual purchased a surplus note of Southern
Mutual in the principal amount of $2.5 million, Donegal Mutual designees became a majority of the
members of Southern Mutuals board of directors and Donegal Mutual agreed to provide quota share
reinsurance to Southern Mutual for 100% of its business. Effective October 31, 2009, Donegal Mutual
began to include business Donegal Mutual assumes from Southern Mutual in the pooling agreement with
Atlantic States. Southern Mutual writes primarily personal lines of insurance in Georgia and South
Carolina and had direct premiums written of approximately $13.3 million in 2009. Pursuant to
applicable accounting standards, Southern Mutual is a variable interest entity, of which we are not
the primary beneficiary.
In April 2010, DFSC and certain of its affiliates, including Donegal Mutual and us, and Union
National Financial Corporation (UNNF) executed an agreement pursuant to which DFSC and UNNF would
merge, with DFSC as the surviving company in the merger. The merger is subject to a number of
conditions, including approval of the merger by the holders of 80% of the outstanding shares of
UNNF and the approval of various federal bank regulatory agencies. Under the agreement, Province
Bank FSB, which DFSC owns, and Union National Community Bank, which UNNF owns, would also merge.
The combined bank would
6
have total assets of approximately $600 million and would have 13 branch
locations in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The companies expect to complete the mergers in the
fourth quarter of 2010.
In July 2010, we executed an agreement pursuant to which we will acquire all of the
outstanding stock of Michigan Insurance Company (MICO), an 83.6%-owned subsidiary of West Bend
Mutual Insurance Company (WBM). MICO writes various lines of property and casualty insurance
exclusively in the State of Michigan. MICO had direct written premiums of $106.6 million and net
written premiums of $26.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The purchase price will be
calculated based on the United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) book value
of MICO as of the closing date of the acquisition. We estimate that the purchase price payable to
the shareholders of MICO will be approximately $39 million. The acquisition is subject to a number
of conditions, including the approval of the Insurance Department of the State of Michigan. We
expect to complete the acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2010.
2 Basis of Presentation
Our financial information for the interim periods included in this Form 10-Q Report is
unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments that, in the opinion of our management, are necessary for a fair presentation of our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows for those interim periods. Our results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations we expect for the year ending December 31, 2010.
You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
7
3 Earnings Per Share
We have two classes of common stock, which we refer to as our Class A common stock and our
Class B common stock. Our certificate of incorporation provides that whenever our board of
directors declares a dividend on our Class B common stock, our board of directors must also declare
a dividend on our Class A common stock that is payable at the same time to holders as of the same
record date at a rate that is at least 10% greater than the rate at which our board of directors declared the
dividend on our Class B common stock. Accordingly, we use the two-class method to compute our
earnings per common share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines
earnings per share separately for each class of common stock based on dividends we have declared
and an allocation of our remaining undistributed earnings using a participation percentage that
reflects the dividend rights of each class. The table below presents for the periods indicated a
reconciliation of the numerators and denominators we used to compute basic and diluted net income
per share for each class of common stock:
For the Three Months Ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
19,953,539 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,898,680 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
3,507 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic computations |
|
|
19,953,539 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,898,680 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director and employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in per share
computations |
|
|
19,953,539 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,898,680 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income |
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
19,942,153 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,891,096 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income |
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
3,642 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic computations |
|
|
19,942,153 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,891,096 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director and employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in per share
computations |
|
|
19,942,153 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,891,096 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
We did not include outstanding options to purchase the following number of shares of Class A
common stock in our computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the
options was greater than the average market price during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Number of shares excluded |
|
|
3,290,099 |
|
|
|
3,413,932 |
|
|
|
3,290,099 |
|
|
|
3,423,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Reinsurance
Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual have participated in a pooling agreement since 1986 under
which each company places all of its direct written business into the pool, and Atlantic States and
Donegal Mutual then share the underwriting results of the pool in accordance with the terms of the
pooling agreement. From July 1, 2000 through February 29, 2008, Atlantic States had a 70% share of
the results of the pool, and Donegal Mutual had a 30% share of the results of the pool. Donegal
Mutual and Atlantic States amended the pooling agreement effective March 1, 2008 to increase
Atlantic States share of the results of the pool to 80% beginning on that date.
Atlantic States, Southern and Donegal Mutual purchase third-party reinsurance on a
combined basis. Le Mars, Peninsula and Sheboygan have separate third-party reinsurance programs
that provide similar types of coverage and that are commensurate with their relative size and risk
exposures. Our insurance subsidiaries place reinsurance with various reinsurers, all of which,
consistent with Donegal Insurance Groups requirements, have an A.M. Best rating of A- (Excellent)
or better or, with respect to foreign reinsurers, have a financial condition that, in the opinion
of our management, is equivalent to a company with at least an A- rating. The following
information describes the external reinsurance our insurance subsidiaries have in place during 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
excess of loss reinsurance, under which losses are automatically reinsured,
through a series of reinsurance agreements, over a set retention ($750,000), and |
|
|
|
|
catastrophe reinsurance, under which Donegal Mutual, Atlantic States and Southern
recover, through a series of reinsurance agreements, 100% of an accumulation of many
losses resulting from a single event, including natural disasters, over a set
retention ($3.0 million). |
Our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual also purchase facultative reinsurance to cover
exposures from losses that exceed the limits provided by their reinsurance agreements with third
parties.
In addition to the pooling agreement and third-party reinsurance, our insurance subsidiaries
have various reinsurance agreements with Donegal Mutual.
We made no significant changes to our third-party reinsurance or the reinsurance agreements
between our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
9
5 Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our fixed maturities and equity securities at
June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
60,045 |
|
|
|
3,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,606 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4,278 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
68,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,757 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
71,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
36,378 |
|
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
36,926 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
376,303 |
|
|
|
14,315 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
389,752 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
28,613 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
29,406 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
76,808 |
|
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
80,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
518,102 |
|
|
|
18,976 |
|
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
536,087 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
14,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
526,153 |
|
|
$ |
25,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
550,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our fixed maturities and equity
securities at December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
61,736 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
64,723 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
6,243 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
73,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,236 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
77,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
41,061 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
40,630 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
346,799 |
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
358,367 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
26,972 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
27,766 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
88,914 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
90,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
503,746 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
517,704 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
6,339 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
507,550 |
|
|
$ |
22,303 |
|
|
$ |
2,234 |
|
|
$ |
527,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of our fixed maturities at June 30, 2010, by
contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
Held to maturity |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
3,995 |
|
|
$ |
4,032 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
13,845 |
|
|
|
14,744 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
45,675 |
|
|
|
48,358 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity |
|
$ |
68,001 |
|
|
$ |
71,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
15,460 |
|
|
$ |
15,664 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
84,130 |
|
|
|
87,091 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
110,446 |
|
|
|
114,540 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
231,258 |
|
|
|
238,789 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
76,808 |
|
|
|
80,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale |
|
$ |
518,102 |
|
|
$ |
536,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains and losses from investments before applicable income taxes are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gross realized gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
1,631 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
$ |
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains |
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We held fixed maturities and equity securities with unrealized losses representing
declines that we considered temporary at June 30, 2010 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government
corporations and
agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,233 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
15,705 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
17,144 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
5,287 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
23,071 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
21,112 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
We held fixed maturities and equity securities with unrealized losses representing
declines that we considered temporary at December 31, 2009 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government
corporations and
agencies |
|
$ |
26,704 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
17,971 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
29,582 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
23,514 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
71,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
$ |
30,727 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of our total fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss at June 30, 2010, we
classified 29 securities with a fair value of $38.1 million and an unrealized loss of $991,033 as
available-for-sale and carried them at fair value on our balance sheet, while we classified three
securities with a fair value of $824,743 and an unrealized loss of $7,761 as held-to-maturity on
our balance sheet and carried them at amortized cost.
Of our total fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss at December 31, 2009, we
classified 70 securities with a fair value of $97.9 million and an unrealized loss of $2.1 million
as available-for-sale and carried them at fair value on our balance sheet, while we classified
three securities with a fair value of $2.3 million and an unrealized loss of $37,097 as
held-to-maturity on our balance sheet and carried them at amortized cost.
We have no direct exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities and hold no
collateralized debt obligations. Substantially all of the unrealized losses in our fixed maturity
investment portfolio have resulted from general market conditions and the related impact on our
fixed maturity investment valuations. We make estimates concerning the valuation of our investments
and the recognition of other-than-temporary declines in the value of our investments. For equity
securities, when we consider the decline in value of an individual investment to be other than
temporary, we write the investment down to its fair value, and we reflect the amount of the
write-down as a realized loss in our results of operations. We individually monitor all investments
for other-than-temporary declines in value. Generally, if an individual equity security has
depreciated in value by more than 20% of original cost, and has been in such an unrealized loss
position for more than six months, we assume there has been an other-than-temporary decline in
value. We held nine equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010.
Based upon our analysis of general market conditions and underlying factors impacting these equity
securities, we consider these declines in value to be temporary. With respect to a debt security
that is in an unrealized loss position, we first assess if we intend to sell the debt security. If
we intend to sell the debt security, we recognize the impairment loss in our results of operations.
If we do not intend to sell the debt security, we determine whether it is more likely than not that
we will be required to sell the security prior to
recovery. If it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security prior to
recovery, we recognize an impairment loss in our results of operations. If it is more likely than
not that we will not be required to sell the debt security prior to recovery, we then evaluate
whether a credit loss has occurred. To determine whether a credit loss has occurred, we compare the
amortized cost of the debt security to the present value of the cash flows we expect to collect. If
we expect a cash flow shortfall, we consider a credit loss to have occurred. If we consider a
credit loss to have occurred, we consider the impairment to be other than temporary. We then
recognize the amount of the impairment loss related to the credit loss in our results of
operations, and we recognize the remaining portion of the impairment loss in our other
comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. In addition, we may write down securities in an
unrealized loss position based on a number of other factors, including the fair value of the
investment being significantly below its cost, whether the financial condition of the issuer of the
security is deteriorating, the occurrence of industry, company and geographic events that have
negatively impacted the value of the security and rating agency downgrades. We determined that no
investments with fair values below cost had declined on an other-than-temporary basis during the
first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We amortize premiums and discounts on debt securities over the life of the security as an
adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. We compute realized investment gains and
losses using the specific identification method.
12
We amortize premiums and discounts for mortgage-backed debt securities using anticipated
prepayments.
We account for investments in our affiliates using the equity method of accounting, under
which we record our investment at cost, with adjustments for our share of our affiliates earnings
and losses as well as changes in our affiliates equity due to unrealized gains and losses.
13
6 Segment Information
We evaluate the performance of our personal lines and commercial lines segments based upon the
underwriting results of our insurance subsidiaries using statutory accounting principles prescribed
or permitted by various state insurance departments (SAP). Our management uses SAP to measure the
performance of our insurance subsidiaries instead of GAAP. Financial data by segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
28,903 |
|
|
$ |
28,065 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
64,099 |
|
|
|
59,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
93,002 |
|
|
|
87,669 |
|
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP premiums earned |
|
|
93,002 |
|
|
|
87,540 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
5,266 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
101,525 |
|
|
$ |
94,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,603 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
(9,430 |
) |
|
|
(4,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(7,600 |
) |
|
|
(2,759 |
) |
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(5,901 |
) |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
5,266 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Other |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
$ |
5,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
56,591 |
|
|
$ |
57,324 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
127,811 |
|
|
|
119,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
184,402 |
|
|
|
176,335 |
|
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP premiums earned |
|
|
184,374 |
|
|
|
175,890 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
9,899 |
|
|
|
10,624 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,116 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
199,376 |
|
|
$ |
190,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
(761 |
) |
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
(12,267 |
) |
|
|
(10,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(13,028 |
) |
|
|
(8,208 |
) |
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(11,338 |
) |
|
|
(6,869 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
9,899 |
|
|
|
10,624 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
2,146 |
|
|
$ |
5,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
7 Subordinated Debentures
On October 29, 2003, we received $10.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of
subordinated debentures. The debentures mature on October 29, 2033 and are callable at our option,
at par. The debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.85%,
which is adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2010, the interest rate on the debentures was 4.18%.
On May 24, 2004, we received $5.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated
debentures. The debentures mature on May 24, 2034 and are callable at our option, at par. The
debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.85%, which is
adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2010, the interest rate on the debentures was 4.33%.
8 ShareBased Compensation
We measure all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, using a
fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statements of income.
In determining the expense we record for stock options granted to directors and employees of our
subsidiaries and affiliates other than Donegal Mutual, we estimate the fair value of each option
award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The significant
assumptions we utilized in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model are the risk-free
interest rate, expected term, dividend yield and expected volatility.
We charged compensation expense for our stock compensation plans against income before income
taxes of $60,824 and $48,691 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, with
a corresponding income tax benefit of $20,680 and $17,042, respectively. We charged compensation
expense for our stock compensation plans against income before income taxes of $120,985 and
$110,391 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, with a corresponding income
tax benefit of $41,135 and $38,637, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, our total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation granted under our stock
compensation plans was $80,797. We expect to recognize this cost over a weighted average period of
0.7 years.
We account for share-based compensation to employees and directors of Donegal Mutual as
share-based compensation to employees of a controlling entity. As such, we measure the fair value
of the award at the grant date and recognize the fair value as a dividend to Donegal Mutual. This
accounting applies to options we grant to employees and directors of Donegal Mutual, the employer
of a majority of the employees that provide services to us. We recorded implied dividends of $0 and
$5,298 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We recorded implied
dividends of $23,072 and $32,923 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We received no cash from option exercises under all stock option compensation plans for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. We realized no tax benefits for the tax deductions from
option exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
9 Fair Value Measurements
We account for financial assets using a framework that establishes a hierarchy that ranks the
quality and reliability of inputs, or assumptions, used in the determination of fair value, and we
classify financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value in one of the following three
categories:
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2 directly or indirectly observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices; and
Level 3 unobservable inputs not corroborated by market data.
For investments that have quoted market prices in active markets, we use the quoted market
price as fair value and include these investments in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. We
classify publicly traded equity securities as Level 1. When quoted market prices in active markets
are not available, we base fair values on quoted market prices of comparable instruments or broker
quotes we obtain from independent pricing services through a bank trustee. We classify our fixed
maturity investments as Level 2. Our fixed maturity investments consist of U.S. Treasury securities
and obligations of U.S, government corporations
15
and agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, corporate securities and
residential mortgage-backed securities. During the first six months of 2010, we classified one
equity security as Level 3. We utilized a fair value model that incorporated significant other
unobservable inputs, such as estimated volatility, to estimate the equity securitys fair value.
Pursuant to terms of an initial public offering, we are restricted from selling this security for a
specified period, and the fair value we determined as of June 30, 2010 reflects this restriction.
During the first six months of 2010, we recorded unrealized income of $94,419 related to this
security in other comprehensive income.
We present our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities at
estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of a security may differ from the amount that could
be realized if the security was sold in a forced transaction. In addition, the valuation of fixed
maturity investments is more subjective when markets are less liquid, increasing the potential that
the estimated fair value does not reflect the price at which an actual transaction would occur. We
utilize nationally recognized independent pricing services to estimate fair values for our fixed
maturity and equity investments. The pricing services utilize market quotations for fixed maturity
and equity securities that have quoted prices in active markets. For fixed maturity securities
that generally do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing services prepare estimates of fair value
measurements using proprietary pricing applications, which include available relevant market
information, benchmark yields, sector curves and matrix pricing. The pricing services do not use
broker quotes in determining the fair values of our investments. We review the estimates of fair
value the pricing services provide to determine if the estimates obtained are representative of
fair values based upon our general knowledge of the market, our research findings related to
unusual fluctuations in value and our comparison of such values to execution prices for similar
securities. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we received one estimate per security from
one of the pricing services and we priced all but an insignificant amount of our Level 1 and Level
2 investments using those prices. In our review of the estimates the pricing services provided as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we did not identify any discrepancies and we did not make
any adjustments to the estimates the pricing services provided.
We present our cash and short-term investments at cost, which approximates fair value. The
carrying values in the balance sheet for premium and reinsurance receivables and payables
approximate their fair values. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for our
subordinated debentures approximate their fair values due to their variable rate nature, and there
has been no change in our creditworthiness.
We evaluate our assets and liabilities on a recurring basis to determine the appropriate level
at which to classify them for each reporting period. The following table presents our fair value
measurements for our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities as of
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
36,926 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,926 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
389,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
29,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
80,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
14,137 |
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
550,224 |
|
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
537,271 |
|
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
We did not have any transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the quarter ended June 30,
2010.
16
The following table presents our fair value measurements for our investments in
available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
40,630 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,630 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
358,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
27,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
90,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
6,232 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
527,618 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
518,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,232 |
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll forward of the significant unobservable inputs for
our Level 3 securities for the three months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
5,852 |
|
Net unrealized income |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll forward of the significant unobservable inputs for
our Level 3 securities for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
6,232 |
|
Net unrealized income |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, we had no material unrecognized tax
benefits or accrued interest and penalties. The Internal Revenue Service examined our 2006 federal
tax return and made no adjustments to the taxes we had reported. Tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009
remained open for examination as of June 30, 2010.
11 Impact of New Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, codified in ASC subtopic 860-20. ASC subtopic 860-20 amends
the derecognition guidance in Statement 140 and eliminates the concept of qualifying
special-purpose
entities. ASC subtopic 860-20 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. We adopted ASC subtopic 860-20 on January 1, 2010. The adoption did not impact
our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), which
amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs) and is codified
in ASC subtopic 810-10. An entity would consolidate a VIE, as the primary beneficiary, when the
entity has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive
benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. ASC subtopic 810-10
requires ongoing reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASC
subtopic 810-10 amends interpretation 46(R) to eliminate the quantitative approach previously
required for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASC subtopic 810-10 is
17
effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. We adopted ASC subtopic 810-10
on January 1, 2010. The adoption did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06,Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends ASC subtopic 820-10 by requiring
new, and clarifying existing, fair value disclosures. ASU 2010-06 is effective for the interim
period ended March 31, 2010, except for certain new Level 3 rollforward disclosures, which are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. We have included herein the disclosures ASU 2010-06 requires for the first half of
2010, and we will include the Level 3 rollforward disclosures ASU 2010-06 requires for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2010.
12 Subsequent Event
In July 2010, we executed an agreement pursuant to which we will acquire all of the
outstanding stock of MICO, an 83.6%-owned subsidiary of WBM. MICO writes various lines of property
and casualty insurance exclusively in the State of Michigan. MICO had direct written premiums of
$106.6 million and net written premiums of $26.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
purchase price will be calculated based on the GAAP book value of MICO as of the closing date of
the acquisition. We estimate that the purchase price payable to the shareholders of MICO will be
approximately $39 million. The acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, including the
approval of the Insurance Department of the State of Michigan. We expect to complete the
acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
You should read the following information in conjunction with the historical financial
information and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We combine our financial statements with those of our insurance subsidiaries and present our
financial statements on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
Our insurance subsidiaries make estimates and assumptions that can have a significant effect
on amounts and disclosures that we report in our financial statements. The most significant
estimates relate to our insurance subsidiaries reserves for property and casualty insurance unpaid
losses and loss expenses, valuation of investments and determination of other-than-temporary
impairment in the value of investments and policy acquisition costs. While we believe our estimates
and the estimates of our insurance subsidiaries are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ
from the amounts estimated. We regularly review these estimates and reflect any adjustment we
consider necessary in our current results of operations.
Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses
Liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses are estimates at a given point in time of the
amounts an insurer expects to pay with respect to policyholder claims based on facts and
circumstances the insurer
then knows. An insurer recognizes at the time it establishes its estimates that its ultimate
liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses will exceed or be less than those estimates. Our
insurance subsidiaries base their estimates of liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses on
assumptions as to future loss trends and expected claims severity, judicial theories of liability
and other factors, including prevailing economic conditions. However, during the loss adjustment
period, our insurance subsidiaries may learn additional facts regarding individual claims, and,
consequently, it often becomes necessary for our insurance subsidiaries to adjust their estimates
of liability. Our insurance subsidiaries reflect any adjustments to their liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss expenses in their results of operations for the period in which our insurance
subsidiaries change their estimates.
Our insurance subsidiaries maintain liabilities for the payment of unpaid losses and loss
expenses with respect to both reported and unreported claims. It is the intent of our insurance
subsidiaries that their liabilities for loss expenses will cover the ultimate costs of settling all
losses, including investigation and litigation costs from those losses. Our insurance subsidiaries
base the amount of their liabilities for reported
18
losses primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation
of the type of risk involved, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding each claim and the
provisions of our insurance policies relating to the type of loss. Our insurance subsidiaries
determine the amount of their liabilities for unreported claims and loss expenses on the basis of
historical information by line of insurance. Our insurance subsidiaries account for inflation in
the reserving function through analysis of costs and trends and reviews of historical reserving
results. Our insurance subsidiaries closely monitor their liabilities and recompute them
periodically using new information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. Our
insurance subsidiaries do not discount their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses.
Our liability estimates can change over time because of unexpected changes in assumptions
related to our insurance subsidiaries external environment and, to a lesser extent, assumptions as
to our insurance subsidiaries internal operations. For example, our insurance subsidiaries have
experienced a decrease in claims frequency on workers compensation claims during the past several
years while claims severity has gradually increased. These trend changes give rise to greater
uncertainty as to the pattern of future loss settlements on bodily injury claims. Related
uncertainties regarding future trends include the cost of medical technologies and procedures and
changes in the utilization of medical procedures. Assumptions related to our insurance
subsidiaries external environment include the absence of significant changes in tort law and the
legal environment that increase liability exposure, consistency in judicial interpretations of
insurance coverage and policy provisions and the rate of loss cost inflation. Internal assumptions
include accurate measurement of the impact of rate changes and changes in policy provisions and
consistency in the quality and characteristics of business written within a given line of business
among other items. To the extent our insurance subsidiaries determine that underlying factors
impacting their assumptions have changed, our insurance subsidiaries make adjustments they consider
appropriate for those changes in their liabilities. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries
ultimate liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses will likely differ from the amount recorded
at June 30, 2010. For every 1% change in our estimate of our insurance subsidiaries liability for
unpaid losses and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverable, the effect on our pre-tax results
of operations would be approximately $1.8 million.
The establishment of appropriate liabilities is an inherently uncertain process. There can be
no assurance that the ultimate liability of our insurance subsidiaries will not exceed our
insurance subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense reserves and have an adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we cannot predict the timing,
frequency and extent of adjustments to our insurance subsidiaries estimated future liabilities,
since the historical conditions and events that serve as a basis for our insurance subsidiaries
estimates of ultimate claim costs may change. As is the case for substantially all property and
casualty insurance companies, our insurance subsidiaries have found it necessary in the past to
increase their estimated future liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses in certain periods,
and in other periods their estimates have exceeded their actual liabilities. Changes in our
insurance subsidiaries estimate of their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses generally
reflect actual payments and the evaluation of information received since the prior reporting date.
Excluding the impact of severe weather events, our insurance subsidiaries have noted slight
downward trends in the number of claims incurred and the number of claims outstanding at period
ends relative to their premium base in recent years across most of their lines of business.
However, the amount of the average claim outstanding has increased gradually over the past several
years as the property and casualty insurance industry has experienced increased litigation trends,
periods in which economic conditions have extended the estimated length of disabilities, increased
medical loss cost trends and a general slowing of settlement rates in litigated claims. We may
make adjustments in the future to reflect subsequent developments. However, on the basis of our
insurance subsidiaries internal procedures, which analyze, among other things, their prior
assumptions, their experience with similar cases and historical
trends such as reserving patterns, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix,
as well as court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes, we believe that our insurance
subsidiaries have made adequate provision for their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses
as of June 30, 2010.
Atlantic States participation in the pool with Donegal Mutual exposes it to adverse loss
development on the business of Donegal Mutual that is included in the pool. However, pooled
business represents the predominant percentage of the net underwriting activity of both companies,
and Donegal Mutual and Atlantic States share any adverse risk development of the pooled business
according to their respective participation in the pool. The business in the pool is homogeneous,
and the pooling agreement provides that each company has a percentage share of the entire pool.
Since Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual pool substantially all their business and each company
shares the results according to its respective participation level under the terms of the pooling
agreement, the intent of the underwriting pool is to produce a more uniform and stable underwriting
result from year to year for each company than they would experience individually and to spread the
risk of loss between Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual.
19
The risk profiles of the business Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual write have historically
been, and continue to be, substantially similar. The same executive management and underwriting
personnel administer products, classes of business underwritten, pricing practices and underwriting
standards of Donegal Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries.
In addition, Donegal Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries, operating together as the Donegal
Insurance Group, share a combined business plan to achieve market penetration and underwriting
profitability objectives. The products our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual offer are
generally complementary, thereby allowing Donegal Insurance Group to offer a broader range of
products to a given market and to expand Donegal Insurance Groups ability to service an entire
personal lines or commercial lines account. Distinctions within the products of Donegal Mutual and
our insurance subsidiaries generally relate to specific risk profiles targeted within similar
classes of business, such as preferred tier products compared to standard tier products, but we do
not allocate all of the standard risk gradients to one company. Therefore, the underwriting
profitability of the business directly written by the individual companies will vary. However,
because the pool homogenizes the risk characteristics of all business written directly by Donegal
Mutual and Atlantic States and each company shares the results according to each companys
participation percentage, each company realizes its percentage share of the underwriting results of
the pool. Our insurance subsidiaries unpaid liability for losses and loss expenses by major line
of business as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commercial lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
20,702 |
|
|
$ |
21,465 |
|
Workers compensation |
|
|
39,443 |
|
|
|
38,092 |
|
Commercial multi-peril |
|
|
34,156 |
|
|
|
30,640 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial lines |
|
|
96,314 |
|
|
|
92,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
71,005 |
|
|
|
70,019 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
14,933 |
|
|
|
16,312 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personal lines |
|
|
87,750 |
|
|
|
88,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and personal lines |
|
|
184,064 |
|
|
|
180,262 |
|
Plus reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
92,166 |
|
|
|
83,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
276,230 |
|
|
$ |
263,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
We have evaluated the effect on our insurance subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense
reserves and our stockholders equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the variables we
considered in establishing the loss and loss expense reserves of our insurance subsidiaries. We
established the range of reasonably likely changes based on a review of changes in accident year
development by line of business and applied those changes to our insurance subsidiaries loss
reserves as a whole. The selected range does not necessarily indicate what could be the potential
best or worst case or the most likely scenario. The following table sets forth the estimated
effect on our insurance subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense reserves and our stockholders
equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the variables we considered in establishing
loss and loss expense reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Loss and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
Loss Expense |
|
Percentage Change |
|
Adjusted Loss and |
|
Percentage Change |
Change in Loss |
|
Reserves Net of |
|
in Stockholders |
|
Loss Expense |
|
in Stockholders |
and Loss Expense |
|
Reinsurance as of |
|
Equity as of |
|
Reserves Net of |
|
Equity as of |
Reserves Net of |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
Reinsurance as of |
|
December 31, |
Reinsurance |
|
2010 |
|
2010(1) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
2009(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)% |
|
$ |
165,658 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
162,236 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
(7.5
|
) |
|
|
170,259 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
166,742 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
(5.0
|
) |
|
|
174,861 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
171,249 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
(2.5
|
) |
|
|
179,462 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
175,755 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Base
|
|
|
|
184,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
188,666 |
|
|
|
-0.8 |
|
|
|
184,769 |
|
|
|
-0.8 |
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
193,267 |
|
|
|
-1.5 |
|
|
|
189,275 |
|
|
|
-1.5 |
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
197,869 |
|
|
|
-2.3 |
|
|
|
193,782 |
|
|
|
-2.3 |
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
202,470 |
|
|
|
-3.1 |
|
|
|
198,288 |
|
|
|
-3.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of income tax effect. |
Investments
We make estimates concerning the valuation of our investments and the recognition of
other-than-temporary declines in the value of our investments. For equity securities, when we
consider the decline in value of an individual investment to be other than temporary, we write down
the investment to its fair value, and we reflect the amount of the write-down as a realized loss in
our results of operations. We individually monitor all investments for other-than-temporary
declines in value. Generally, if an individual equity security has depreciated in value by more
than 20% of original cost, and has been in such an unrealized loss position for more than six
months, we assume there has been an other-than-temporary decline in value. We held nine equity
securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010. Based upon our analysis of
general market conditions and underlying factors impacting these equity securities, we consider
these declines in value to be temporary. With respect to a debt security that is in an unrealized
loss position, we first assess if we intend to sell the debt security. If we intend to sell the
debt security, we recognize the impairment loss in our results of operations. If we do not intend
to sell the debt security, we determine whether it is more likely than not that we will be required
to sell the security prior to recovery. If it is more likely than not that we will be required to
sell the debt security prior to recovery, we recognize an impairment loss in our results of
operations. If it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the debt security
prior to recovery, we then evaluate whether a credit loss has occurred. To determine whether a
credit loss has occurred, we compare the amortized cost of the debt security to the present value
of the cash flows we expect to collect. If we expect a cash flow shortfall, we consider a credit
loss to have occurred. If we consider that a credit loss has occurred, we consider the impairment
to be other than temporary. We then recognize the amount of the impairment loss related to the
credit loss in our results of operations, and we recognize the remaining portion of the impairment
loss in our other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. In addition, we may write down
securities in an unrealized loss position based on a number of other factors, including the fair
value of the investment being significantly below its cost, whether the financial condition of the
issuer of a security is deteriorating, the occurrence of industry, company and geographic events
that have negatively impacted the value of a security and rating agency downgrades. We determined
that no investments with a fair value below cost had declined on an other-than-temporary basis
during the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
21
We present our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities at
estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of a security may differ from the amount that could
be realized if the security was sold in a forced transaction. In addition, the valuation of fixed
maturity investments is more subjective when markets are less liquid, increasing the potential that
the estimated fair value does not reflect the price at which an actual transaction would occur. We
utilize nationally recognized independent pricing services to estimate fair values for our fixed
maturity and equity investments. The pricing services utilize market quotations for fixed
maturity and equity securities that have quoted prices in active markets. For fixed maturity
securities that generally do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing services prepare estimates of
fair value measurements using proprietary pricing applications, which include available relevant
market information, benchmark yields, sector curves and matrix pricing. The pricing services do
not use broker quotes in determining the fair values of our investments. We review the estimates
of fair value the pricing services provide to determine if the estimates obtained are
representative of market prices based upon our general knowledge of the market, our research
findings related to unusual fluctuations in value and our comparison of such values to execution
prices for similar securities. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we received one
estimate per security from one of the pricing services and we priced all but an insignificant
amount of our Level 1 and Level 2 investments using those prices. In our review of the estimates
the pricing services provided as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we did not identify any
discrepancies and we did not make any adjustments to the fair value estimates the pricing services
provided. We classified one equity security as Level 3 as of June 30, 2010, as described in
Footnote 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We utilized a fair value model that
incorporated significant other unobservable inputs, such as estimated volatility, to estimate the
equity securitys fair value. Pursuant to terms of an initial public offering, we are restricted
from selling this security for a specified period, and the fair value we determined as of June 30,
2010 reflects this restriction.
Policy Acquisition Costs
Our insurance subsidiaries defer their policy acquisition costs, consisting primarily of
commissions, premium taxes and certain other underwriting costs that vary with and relate primarily
to the production of business. We amortize these costs over the period in which our insurance
subsidiaries earn the related premiums. The method we follow in computing deferred policy
acquisition costs limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value,
which gives effect to the premiums to be earned, related investment income, losses and loss
expenses and certain other costs we expect to incur as our insurance subsidiaries earn the
premiums.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2009
Net Premiums Written. Net premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were
$102.4 million, an increase of $8.8 million, or 9.4%, from the $93.6 million of net premiums
written for the comparable period in 2009. Personal lines net premiums written increased $4.8
million, or 7.4%, for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009. The
increase was attributable to additional personal lines premiums received from the pooling agreement
as a result of Donegal Mutuals affiliation with Southern Mutual, as well as increased writings in
our personal automobile and homeowners lines of business. Commercial lines net premiums written
increased $4.0 million, or 13.7%, for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the comparable period
in 2009 due to increased writings in our commercial multi-peril and workers compensation lines of
business.
Net Premiums Earned. Net premiums earned were $93.0 million, an increase of $5.5 million, or
6.3%, compared to $87.5 million for the second quarter of 2009. Our insurance subsidiaries earn
premiums and recognize them as revenue over the terms of their policies, which are one year or less
in duration.
Therefore, increases or decreases in net premiums earned generally reflect increases or
decreases in net premiums written in the preceding twelve-month period compared to the comparable
period one year earlier.
Investment Income. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our net investment income
decreased to $5.0 million, compared to $5.3 million for the comparable period one year ago. An
increase in our average invested assets from $635.1 million for the second quarter of 2009 to
$664.9 million for the second quarter of 2010 was offset by a decrease in our annualized average
rate of return to 3.0% in 2010, compared to 3.3% in 2009. Our annualized average rate of return on
investments decreased primarily due to lower market interest rates over the past year.
Net Realized Investment Gains. Net realized investment gains for the second quarter of 2010
were $2.0 million, compared to $445,140 for the comparable period in 2009. We did not recognize any
impairment losses during the second quarter of 2010 or 2009.
22
Losses and Loss Expenses. Our loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss
expenses to premiums earned, for the second quarter of 2010 was 73.7%, an increase from our 70.7%
loss ratio for the second quarter of 2009. We incurred weather-related losses of approximately $10
million after reinsurance during the second quarter of 2010, primarily related to a number of wind
and hail events in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions, compared to approximately $8.0 million
during the second quarter of 2009. We incurred fire losses of approximately $6.1 million during
the second quarter of 2010, compared to approximately $3.5 million during the second quarter of
2009. Our commercial lines loss ratio decreased to 61.1% for the second quarter of 2010, compared
to 64.0% for the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to decreases in our commercial automobile
and workers compensation loss ratios. Our personal lines loss ratio increased to 79.6% for the
second quarter of 2010, compared to 74.0% for the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to
increases in our personal automobile and homeowners loss ratios.
Underwriting Expenses. Our expense ratio, which is the ratio of policy acquisition costs and
other underwriting expenses to premiums earned, for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009 were 32.6%
and 31.0%, respectively. Our expense ratio for both periods reflected decreased expenses incurred
for underwriting-based incentive compensation costs as a result of our higher loss ratios.
Combined Ratio. Our combined ratio was 106.4% and 101.8% for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Our combined ratio represents the sum of our loss ratio, expense ratio
and dividend ratio, which is the ratio of workers compensation policy dividends incurred to
premiums earned. The increase in combined ratio is due to an increase in loss ratio.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2010 was $168,935, compared to
$198,467 for the second quarter of 2009. The lower interest expense in the 2010 period reflected a
decrease in average interest rates on our subordinated debentures for the second quarter of 2010
compared to the comparable period in 2009.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $131,148 for the second quarter of 2010, representing an
effective tax rate of 7.0%, compared to $745,904 for the second quarter of 2009, representing an
effective tax rate of 14.5%. Effective tax rates in both periods represented estimates based on
projected annual taxable income, with the decrease in 2010 attributable to tax-exempt interest
representing a larger proportion of our income before taxes.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net income for the second quarter of 2010 was $1.7
million, or $.07 per share of Class A common stock and $.06 per share of Class B common stock,
compared to net income of $4.4 million, or $.18 per share of Class A common stock and $.16 per
share of Class B common stock, for the second quarter of 2009. We had 19.9 million Class A shares
and 5.6 million Class B shares outstanding for both periods.
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net Premiums Written. Net premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $195.3
million, an increase of $13.7 million, or 7.6%, from the $181.6 million of net premiums written for
the comparable period in 2009. Personal lines net premiums written increased $8.4 million, or
6.9%, for the first half of 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009. The increase was
attributable to additional personal lines premiums received from the pooling agreement as a result
of Donegal Mutuals affiliation with Southern Mutual, as well as increased writings in our personal
automobile and homeowners lines of business. Commercial lines net premiums written increased $5.3
million, or 8.8%, for the first half of 2010
compared to the comparable period in 2009 due to increased writings in our commercial
automobile, commercial multi-peril and workers compensation lines of business.
Net Premiums Earned. Net premiums earned were $184.4 million, an increase of $8.5 million, or
4.8%, compared to $175.9 million for the first half of 2009. Our insurance subsidiaries earn
premiums and recognize them as revenue over the terms of their policies, which are one year or less
in duration. Therefore, increases or decreases in net premiums earned generally reflect increases
or decreases in net premiums written in the preceding twelve-month period compared to the
comparable period one year earlier.
Investment Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net investment income
decreased to $9.9 million, compared to $10.6 million for the comparable period one year ago. An
increase in our average invested assets from $631.4 million for the first half of 2009 to $669.5
million for the first half of 2010 was offset by a decrease in our annualized average rate of
return to 3.0% in 2010, compared to
23
3.4% in 2009. Our annualized average rate of return on
investments decreased primarily due to lower market interest rates over the past year.
Net Realized Investment Gains. Net realized investment gains for the first half of
2010 were $2.0 million, compared to $703,995 for the comparable period in 2009. We did not
recognize any impairment losses during the first half of 2010 or 2009.
Losses and Loss Expenses. Our loss ratio, which is the ratio of incurred losses and loss
expenses to premiums earned, for the first half of 2010 was 74.0%, an increase from our 72.7% loss
ratio for the first half of 2009. We incurred weather-related losses of approximately $19 million
after reinsurance during the first half of 2010, primarily related to a number of wind and hail
events in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions and two major winter storms in the Mid-Atlantic
region, compared to approximately $15.6 million during the first half of 2009. We incurred fire
losses of approximately $14.0 million during the first half of 2010, compared to approximately
$10.5 million during the first half of 2009. Our commercial lines loss ratio increased to 69.5%
for the first half of 2010, compared to 65.8% for the first half of 2009, primarily due to
increases in our commercial automobile and commercial multi-peril loss ratios. Our personal lines
loss ratio increased slightly to 76.3% for the first half of 2010, compared to 76.1% for the first
half of 2009, primarily due to increases in our homeowners loss ratios.
Underwriting Expenses. Our expense ratio, which is the ratio of policy acquisition costs and
other underwriting expenses to premiums earned, for the first half of 2010 and 2009 were 32.0% and
31.0%, respectively. Our expense ratio for both periods reflected decreased expenses incurred for
underwriting-based incentive compensation costs as a result of our higher loss ratios.
Combined Ratio. Our combined ratio was 106.2% and 103.9% for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Our combined ratio represents the sum of our loss ratio, expense ratio
and dividend ratio, which is the ratio of workers compensation policy dividends incurred to
premiums earned. The increase in combined ratio is due to an increase in loss ratio.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the first half of 2010 was $353,693, compared to $1.4
million for the first half of 2009. The lower interest expense in the 2010 period reflected a
decrease in average interest rates on our subordinated debentures for the first half of 2010
compared to the comparable period in 2009. Interest expense for the first half of 2009 included
$974,000 related to interest and penalties on contested premium tax litigation paid during that
period.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $171,928 for the first half of 2010, representing an
effective tax rate of 8.0%, compared to $788,355 for the first half of 2009, representing an
effective tax rate of 14.7%. Effective tax rates in both periods represented estimates based on
projected annual taxable income, with the decrease in 2010 attributable to tax-exempt interest
representing a larger proportion of income before taxes.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net income for the first half of 2010 was $2.0
million, or $.08 per share of Class A common stock and $.07 per share of Class B common stock,
compared to net income of $4.6 million, or $.18 per share of Class A common stock and $.16 per
share of Class B common stock, reported for the first half of 2009. We had 19.9 million Class A
shares outstanding for both periods. We had 5.6 million Class B shares outstanding for both
periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of an entitys ability to secure enough cash to meet its contractual
obligations and operating needs as they arise. Our major sources of funds from operations are the
net cash flows generated from our insurance subsidiaries underwriting results, investment income
and maturing investments.
We have historically generated sufficient net positive cash flow from our operations to fund
our commitments and add to our investment portfolio, thereby increasing future investment returns.
The impact of the pooling agreement between Donegal Mutual and Atlantic States has historically
been cash flow positive because of the consistent underwriting profitability of the pool. We
settle the pool monthly, thereby resulting in cash flows substantially similar to cash flows that
would result from the underwriting of direct business. We have not experienced any unusual
variations in the timing of claim payments associated with the loss reserves of our insurance
subsidiaries. We maintain significant liquidity in our investment portfolio in the form of readily
marketable fixed maturities, equity securities and short-term investments. We structure our
fixed-maturity investment portfolio following a laddering approach, so that projected cash
24
flows from investment income and principal maturities are evenly distributed from a timing perspective,
thereby providing an additional measure of liquidity to meet our obligations should an unexpected
variation occur in the future. Net cash flows provided by operating activities in the first half
of 2010 and 2009 were $4.3 million and $7.7 million, respectively, with the change in cash flows
due primarily to increased claim payments during the first half of 2010.
In June 2010, we renewed our existing credit agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company (M&T) relating to a $35.0 million unsecured, revolving line of credit that will expire in
June 2013. We may request a one-year extension of the credit agreement as of each anniversary date
of the agreement. We may also request an increase in the credit amount in an amount not to exceed
$25.0 million, thereby bringing the line of credit to $60.0 million. As of June 30, 2010, we had
the ability to borrow $35.0 million at interest rates equal to M&Ts current prime rate or the then
current LIBOR rate plus between 1.75% and 2.25%, depending on our leverage ratio. In addition, we
pay a fee of 0.2% per annum on the loan commitment amount regardless of usage. The credit
agreement requires our compliance with certain covenants, which include minimum levels of our net
worth, leverage ratio and statutory surplus and the A.M. Best ratings of our insurance
subsidiaries. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under
the credit agreement, and we were in compliance with all requirements of the credit agreement.
The following table shows our expected payments for significant contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability for unpaid losses and
loss expenses of our insurance
subsidiaries |
|
$ |
184,064 |
|
|
$ |
84,217 |
|
|
$ |
83,876 |
|
|
$ |
7,481 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
15,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
199,529 |
|
|
$ |
84,217 |
|
|
$ |
83,876 |
|
|
$ |
7,481 |
|
|
$ |
23,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate the date of payment for the net liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses of
our insurance subsidiaries based on historical experience and expectations of future payment
patterns. The liability is shown net of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses
to reflect expected future cash flows related to such liability. Amounts Atlantic States assumes
pursuant to the pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual represent a substantial portion of our
insurance subsidiaries gross liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses, and amounts Atlantic
States cedes pursuant to the pooling agreement represent a substantial portion of our insurance
subsidiaries reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses. Cash settlement of
Atlantic States assumed liability from the pool is included in monthly settlements of pooled
activity, as we net amounts ceded to and assumed from the pool. Although Donegal Mutual and we do
not anticipate any changes in the pool participation levels in the foreseeable future, any such
change would be prospective in nature and therefore would not impact the timing of expected
payments by Atlantic States for its percentage share of pooled losses occurring in periods prior
to the effective date of such change.
We estimate the date of payment for the subordinated debentures based on their contractual
maturities. The debentures are redeemable at our option, at par, as discussed in Note 7 -
Subordinated Debentures. The subordinated debentures carry interest rates that vary based upon the
three-month LIBOR rate and adjust quarterly. Based upon the interest rates in effect as of June 30,
2010, our annual interest cost associated with the subordinated debentures is approximately
$634,000. For every 1% change in the three-month LIBOR rate, the effect on our annual interest cost
would be approximately $150,000.
On February 23, 2009, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program, pursuant
to which we may purchase up to 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock at prices prevailing from
time to time in the open market subject to the applicable SEC rules and in privately negotiated
transactions. We did not purchase any shares of our Class A common stock under this program during
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We purchased 9,702 and no shares of
our Class A common stock under this program during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We have purchased a total of 17,371 shares of our Class A common stock under this
program through June 30, 2010.
25
On July 15, 2010, our board of directors declared quarterly cash dividends of 11.5 cents per
share for our Class A common stock and 10.25 cents per share for our Class B common stock, payable
August 16, 2010 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 2, 2010. There are
no regulatory restrictions on our payment of dividends to our stockholders, although there are
state law restrictions on the payment of annual dividends greater than 10% of statutory surplus by
our insurance subsidiaries to us. Our insurance subsidiaries are required by law to maintain
certain minimum surplus on a statutory basis and require prior approval of the applicable
domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities for dividends in excess of 10% of statutory surplus.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital (RBC) requirements. At December 31,
2009, our insurance subsidiaries capital levels were each substantially above the applicable RBC
requirements. At January 1, 2010, amounts available for distribution as dividends to us from our
insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of their domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities
were $19.0 million from Atlantic States, $0 from Southern, $2.8 million from Le Mars, $3.9 million
from Peninsula, and $584,431 from Sheboygan, all of which remained available at June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures. We anticipate
that our pending acquisitions of UNNF and MICO will close in the fourth quarter of 2010. We
currently estimate that the cash purchase price of these acquisitions will total approximately $51
million, which we will derive from our existing internally generated funds, dividends from our
insurance subsidiaries and draws under our line of credit.
Equity Price Risk
Our portfolio of marketable equity securities, which is carried on our consolidated balance
sheets at estimated fair value, has exposure to the risk of loss resulting from an adverse change
in prices. We manage this risk by performing an analysis of prospective investments and through
regular reviews of our portfolio by our investment staff.
Credit Risk
Our portfolio of fixed-maturity securities and, to a lesser extent, our portfolio of
short-term investments is subject to credit risk, which we define as the potential loss in market
value resulting from adverse changes in the borrowers ability to repay the debt. We manage this
risk by performing an analysis of prospective investments and through regular reviews of our
portfolio by our investment staff. We also limit the percentage and amount of our total investment
portfolio that we invest in the securities of any one issuer.
Our insurance subsidiaries provide property and casualty insurance coverages through
independent insurance agencies. We bill the majority of this business directly to the insured,
although a portion of our commercial business is billed through agents to whom our insurance
subsidiaries extend credit in the normal course of business.
Because the pooling agreement does not relieve Atlantic States of primary liability as the
originating insurer, Atlantic States is subject to a concentration of credit risk arising from
business ceded to Donegal Mutual. Our insurance subsidiaries maintain reinsurance agreements with
Donegal Mutual and with a number of other major unaffiliated authorized reinsurers.
Impact of Inflation
We establish property and casualty insurance premium rates before we know the amount of unpaid
losses and loss expenses or the extent to which inflation may impact such expenses. Consequently,
our insurance subsidiaries attempt, in establishing rates, to anticipate the potential impact of
inflation.
26
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Our market risk generally represents the risk of gain or loss that may result from the
potential change in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of fluctuations in
prices and interest rates and, to a lesser extent, our debt obligations. We manage our interest
rate risk by maintaining an appropriate relationship between the average duration of our investment
portfolio and the approximate duration of our liabilities, i.e., policy claims of our insurance
subsidiaries and debt obligations.
Our investment mix has shifted slightly due to a shift from lower-yielding short-term
investments to fixed maturity investments during 2010. We have maintained approximately the same
duration of our investment portfolio to our liabilities from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
There have been no material changes to our quantitative or qualitative market risk exposure
from December 31, 2009 through June 30, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to SEC
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure
that information we, including our consolidated subsidiaries, are required to disclose in our
periodic filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect materially,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
All statements contained in this report that are not historic facts are based on current
expectations. Such statements are forward-looking in nature (as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995) and necessarily involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results
could vary materially. The factors that could cause actual results to vary materially include, but
are not limited to, our ability to maintain profitable operations, the adequacy of our reserves for
unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, business and economic conditions in the areas in which
we operate, conditions resulting from the ongoing recession in the United States, severe weather
events, competition from various insurance and non-insurance businesses, terrorism, the
availability and cost of reinsurance, legal and judicial developments, changes in regulatory
requirements and other risks that we describe from time to time in our filings with the SEC. We
disclaim any obligation to update such statements or to announce publicly the results of any
revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of
anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Not applicable.
27
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition, and, therefore, the value of
our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, are subject to a number of risks. For a
description of certain risks, we refer to Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 11, 2010. There have been no material changes in the risk factors
disclosed in that Form 10-K Report during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
28
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1 |
|
Statement of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2 |
|
Statement of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code |
29
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DONEGAL GROUP INC.
|
|
August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Donald H. Nikolaus
|
|
|
|
Donald H. Nikolaus, President |
|
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey D. Miller
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey D. Miller, Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
30