10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-34776
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
80-0554627 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 1500 |
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
77002 |
| |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(281) 404-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of
shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at
November 8, 2011: 92,457,664 shares.
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share |
|
|
|
data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
163,601 |
|
|
$ |
143,520 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
124,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable oil and gas revenues |
|
|
40,703 |
|
|
|
25,909 |
|
Accounts receivable joint interest partners |
|
|
55,115 |
|
|
|
28,596 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
33,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
425,455 |
|
|
|
205,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) |
|
|
983,768 |
|
|
|
580,968 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
13,825 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment |
|
|
(148,121 |
) |
|
|
(99,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
849,472 |
|
|
|
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
28,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs and other assets |
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,314,376 |
|
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
|
$ |
8,198 |
|
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
11,194 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
Revenues and production taxes payable |
|
|
14,953 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
82,386 |
|
|
|
58,239 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
168,877 |
|
|
|
82,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
86,291 |
|
|
|
45,432 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
667,761 |
|
|
|
140,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized;
92,474,193 issued and 92,453,471 outstanding at September 30, 2011
and 92,240,345 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 20,722 shares |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
646,310 |
|
|
|
643,719 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(92,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
646,615 |
|
|
|
551,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,314,376 |
|
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
87,596 |
|
|
$ |
32,978 |
|
|
$ |
213,546 |
|
|
$ |
79,780 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
9,835 |
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
21,975 |
|
|
|
9,112 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
20,859 |
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
19,870 |
|
|
|
12,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
47,323 |
|
|
|
22,147 |
|
|
|
115,315 |
|
|
|
70,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
40,273 |
|
|
|
10,831 |
|
|
|
98,231 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
71,224 |
|
|
|
(3,124 |
) |
|
|
67,105 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,786 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(18,745 |
) |
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
64,962 |
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
49,575 |
|
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
105,235 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
147,806 |
|
|
|
7,824 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
38,946 |
|
|
|
9,239 |
|
|
|
55,015 |
|
|
|
39,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
66,289 |
|
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (Note 10) |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (Note 10) |
|
|
92,060 |
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
92,052 |
|
|
|
33,700 |
|
Diluted (Note 10) |
|
|
92,164 |
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
92,208 |
|
|
|
33,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Paid-in-Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
92,240 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
643,719 |
|
|
$ |
(92,845 |
) |
|
$ |
551,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock tax withholdings |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,791 |
|
|
|
92,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
92,453 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
(562 |
) |
|
$ |
646,310 |
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
646,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
55,015 |
|
|
|
39,106 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(67,105 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
5,810 |
|
Debt discount amortization and other |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Working capital and other changes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
(41,286 |
) |
|
|
(22,895 |
) |
Change in inventory |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
Change in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
Change in other current assets |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
47,820 |
|
|
|
4,887 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
139,682 |
|
|
|
30,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(386,927 |
) |
|
|
(164,666 |
) |
Derivative settlements |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(124,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(509,012 |
) |
|
|
(164,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,669 |
|
Proceeds from credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
Principal payments on credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
389,411 |
|
|
|
362,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
20,081 |
|
|
|
229,061 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
143,520 |
|
|
|
40,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
163,601 |
|
|
$ |
269,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued capital expenditures |
|
$ |
23,422 |
|
|
$ |
22,585 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Organization and Operations of the Company
Organization
Oasis Petroleum Inc. (Oasis or the Company) was formed on February 25, 2010, pursuant to
the laws of the State of Delaware, to become a publicly traded entity. The Companys predecessor,
Oasis Petroleum LLC, was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on February 26, 2007 by
certain members of the Companys senior management team and through investments made by Oasis
Petroleum Management LLC (OP Management) and certain private equity funds managed by EnCap
Investments L.P. (EnCap). OP Management, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed in
February 2007 to allow Company employees to become indirect investors in Oasis Petroleum LLC. In
May 2007, the Company formed Oasis Petroleum North America LLC (OPNA), a Delaware limited
liability company, to conduct the domestic oil and natural gas exploration and production
activities of the Company. In April 2008, the Company formed Oasis Petroleum International LLC
(OPI), a Delaware limited liability company, to conduct business development activities outside
of the United States of America. In June 2011, the Company formed Oasis Well Services LLC (OWS),
a Delaware limited liability company, to provide well services to OPNA. In July 2011, the Company
formed Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC (OPM), a Delaware limited liability company, to provide
marketing services to OPNA. OWS, OPM and OPI currently have no material business activities or
material assets.
A corporate reorganization occurred concurrently with the completion of the Companys initial
public offering (IPO) of its common stock on June 22, 2010. The Company sold 30,370,000 shares
and OAS Holding Company LLC (OAS Holdco), the selling stockholder, sold 17,930,000 shares of the
Companys common stock, in each case, at $14.00 per share. After deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions of approximately $25.5 million, the Company received net proceeds of $399.7
million. The selling stockholder received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $236.0 million.
The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by OAS Holdco. As a part of
this corporate reorganization, the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in
Oasis Petroleum LLC in exchange for shares of the Companys common stock. The Companys business
continues to be conducted through Oasis Petroleum LLC, as a wholly owned subsidiary.
Nature of Business
The Company is an independent exploration and production company focused on the acquisition
and development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources primarily in the Williston Basin.
The Companys assets, which consist of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties, are
located primarily in the Montana and North Dakota areas of the Williston Basin and are owned by
OPNA.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the
accounts of Oasis and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Oasis Petroleum LLC, OPNA, OPI, OWS and OPM.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have not been audited
by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, except that the condensed
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 is derived from audited financial statements. All
significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation have been included. In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in
the condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results
may differ from those estimates. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
annual results.
5
These interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain
disclosures have been condensed or
omitted from these financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) for complete consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction
with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (2010 Annual Report).
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company invests in certain money market funds, commercial paper and time deposits, all of
which are stated at fair value. The Company classifies all such investments with original maturity
dates less than 90 days as cash equivalents. The Company classifies all such investments with
original maturity dates greater than 90 days as held-to-maturity securities based on managements
intentions to hold the investments to their maturity date.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock shares represent shares withheld by the Company equivalent to the payroll tax
withholding obligations due from employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. The Company
includes the withheld shares as Treasury Stock on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and
separately pays the payroll tax obligation. These retained shares are not part of a publicly
announced program to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock and are accounted for at cost.
The Company does not have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of common stock.
Capitalized Interest
The Company capitalizes a portion of its interest expense incurred on its outstanding debt.
The amount capitalized is determined by multiplying the capitalization rate by the average amount
of eligible accumulated capital expenditures and is limited to actual interest costs incurred
during the period. The accumulated capital expenditures included in the capitalization of interest
calculation begin when the first costs are incurred and end when the asset is either placed into
production or written off.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair value. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04).
ASU 2011-04 changes some fair value measurement principles under U.S. GAAP, including a change in
the valuation premise and the application of premiums and discounts. It also contains some new
disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP. It is effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a
significant impact on its financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Comprehensive income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income
(Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), which requires an entity to
present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two
separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for
items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where
the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The
new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when
an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. On October 21, 2011, the
FASB decided to propose a deferral of the new requirement to present reclassifications of other
comprehensive income on the face of the income statement. ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will be applied retrospectively. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have any impact on its financial position,
cash flows or results of operations.
6
3. Inventory
Equipment and materials consist primarily of tubular goods and well equipment to be used in
future drilling or repair operations and are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost
determined on an average cost method. Crude oil inventories are valued at the lower of average cost
or market value. Inventory consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equipment and materials |
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
Crude oil inventory |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory |
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Property, Plant and Equipment
The following table sets forth the Companys property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Proved oil and gas properties(1) |
|
$ |
896,283 |
|
|
$ |
479,657 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment |
|
|
(147,151 |
) |
|
|
(98,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, net |
|
|
749,132 |
|
|
|
380,836 |
|
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
|
87,485 |
|
|
|
101,311 |
|
Other property and equipment(2) |
|
|
13,825 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment, net |
|
|
12,855 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
849,472 |
|
|
$ |
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the Companys proved oil and gas properties are an estimate of future asset
retirement costs of $10.0 million and $6.3 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the Companys other property and equipment is well service equipment of $7.4
million at September 30, 2011. There was no such equipment at December 31, 2010. |
As a result of expiring unproved property leases, the Company recorded non-cash
impairment charges on its unproved oil and gas properties of $0.4 million and $3.3 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and $0.8 million and $11.8 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. No impairment charges on
proved oil and natural gas properties were recorded for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2011 or 2010.
5. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted
the FASBs authoritative guidance
on fair value measurements effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities and
effective January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and liabilities. The Companys financial assets
and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company recognizes its
non-financial assets and liabilities, such as asset retirement obligations and proved oil and
natural gas properties upon impairment, at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
As defined in the authoritative guidance, fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date (exit price). To estimate fair value, the Company utilizes market data or
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These
inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.
7
The authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used
to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority
to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are
as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset
or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing
basis.
Level 2 Pricing inputs, other than unadjusted quoted prices in active markets included in
Level 1, are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes
those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These
models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted
forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual
prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially
all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the
instrument, and can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which
transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3 Pricing inputs are generally less observable from objective sources, requiring
internally developed valuation methodologies that result in managements best estimate of fair
value.
As required, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may
affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value
hierarchy levels. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the
Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair value as of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
105,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
105,327 |
|
Commodity derivative instruments (Note 6) (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
105,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
$ |
166,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair value as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative instruments (Note 6) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the Companys commodity derivative instruments is a liability for deferred premium puts of
$9.7 million at September 30, 2011. |
The Level 1 instruments presented in the table above consist of money market funds included in
Cash and cash equivalents on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30,
2011. The Companys money market funds represent cash equivalents backed by the assets of banks and
other liquid securities each with a minimum credit rating of A1/P1. The Company identified the
money market funds as Level 1 instruments due to the fact that the money market funds have daily
liquidity, quoted prices for the underlying investments can be obtained and there are active
markets for the underlying investments.
The Level 3 instruments presented in the tables above consist of oil collars. The fair value
of the Companys oil collars is based upon mark-to-market valuation reports provided by its
counterparties for monthly settlement purposes to determine the valuation of its derivative
instruments. The Company has a third-party reviewer evaluate other readily available market prices
for its derivative contracts as there is an active market for these contracts. However, the Company
does not have access to the specific valuation models used by its counterparties or third party
reviewer. The determination of the fair value of the Companys oil collars also incorporates a
credit adjustment for non-performance risk. The Company calculates the credit adjustment for
derivatives in an asset position using current credit default swap values for each counterparty.
The credit adjustment for derivatives in a liability position is based on the Companys current
cost of prime based borrowings (prime rate and associated
margin effect). Based on these calculations, the Company recorded a reduction to the fair
value of its derivative instruments in the amount of $0.5 million and $0.3 million at September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
8
The following table presents a reconciliation of the changes in fair value of the financial
assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,953 |
) |
Total gains (losses) (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
67,105 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Transfers in and out of level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
$ |
(3,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in
earnings relating to derivatives still held at
September 30 |
|
$ |
71,936 |
|
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
At September 30, 2011, the Companys financial instruments, including certain cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable, are carried at
amortized cost, which approximates cost and fair value due to the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The Companys derivative instruments reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet at September 30, 2011 are stated at fair value; however, certain of the derivative
instruments have a deferred premium put, which reduces the asset or increases the liability
depending on the fair value of the derivative instrument. The carrying amount of the Companys
long-term debt (senior unsecured notes due 2019) reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet at September 30, 2011 is $400.0 million, which approximates fair value.
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities
Asset retirement obligations. The carrying amount of the Companys asset retirement
obligations (ARO) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2011 is $11.6
million (see Note 8 Asset Retirement Obligations). The Company determines the ARO by calculating
the present value of estimated cash flows related to the liability. Estimating the future ARO
requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding timing and existence of a liability,
as well as what constitutes adequate restoration. Inherent in the fair value calculation are
numerous assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate costs, inflation factors, credit
adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental
and political environments. These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. To the extent future
revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding
adjustment is made to the related asset.
Impairment. The Company reviews its proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment
whenever events and circumstances indicate that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying
value may have occurred. The Company estimates the expected undiscounted future cash flows of its
oil and natural gas properties and compares such undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying
amount of the oil and natural gas properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the Company will adjust
the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties to fair value. The factors used to
determine fair value are subject to managements judgment and expertise and include, but are not
limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present value of future cash flows,
net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of proved reserves, future
commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and various
discount rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing
the expected cash flows projected. These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. No impairment
charges on proved oil and natural gas properties were recorded for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 or 2010.
9
6. Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in
oil prices. As of September 30, 2011, the Company utilized two-way and three-way collar options and
deferred premium puts to reduce the volatility of oil prices on a significant portion of the
Companys future expected oil production. All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance
sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value (see Note 5 Fair Value
Measurements). Derivative assets and liabilities arising from the Companys derivative contracts
with the same counterparty are also reported on a net basis, as all counterparty contracts provide
for net settlement. The Company has not designated any derivative instruments as hedges for
accounting purposes and does not enter into such instruments for speculative trading purposes. If a
derivative does not qualify as a hedge or is not designated as a hedge, the changes in fair value,
both realized and unrealized, are recognized in the Other Income (Expense) section of the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations as a gain or loss on derivative instruments. The Companys
cash flow is only impacted when the actual settlements under the derivative contracts result in
making or receiving a payment to or from the counterparty. These cash settlements are reflected as
investing activities in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding commodity derivative
instruments, all of which settle monthly based on the average West Texas Intermediate crude oil
index price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
Derivative |
|
Oil |
|
|
Sub-Floor |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Ceiling |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Instrument |
|
(Barrels) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Floor Price |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Fair Value Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
732,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.10 |
|
|
$ |
106.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,064 |
|
2011 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
$ |
60.00 |
|
|
$ |
80.00 |
|
|
$ |
94.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
2012 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,756,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.49 |
|
|
$ |
106.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,391 |
|
2012 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
1,020,500 |
|
|
$ |
69.03 |
|
|
$ |
89.03 |
|
|
$ |
113.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,356 |
|
2012 |
|
Put |
|
|
1,340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
12,829 |
|
2013 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
807,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89.23 |
|
|
$ |
111.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,982 |
|
2013 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
761,000 |
|
|
$ |
72.09 |
|
|
$ |
92.09 |
|
|
$ |
124.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
2013 |
|
Put |
|
|
124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
2014 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
112.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
2014 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
$ |
72.50 |
|
|
$ |
92.50 |
|
|
$ |
126.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the location and fair value of all outstanding commodity
derivative instruments recorded in the balance sheet for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instrument Assets (Liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Instrument Type |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative instruments current assets |
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative instruments non-current assets |
|
|
28,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative instruments current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,543 |
) |
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative instruments non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instrument asset (liability) |
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The following table summarizes the location and amounts of realized and unrealized gains and
losses from the Companys commodity derivative instruments for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Income Statement Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
71,403 |
|
|
$ |
(3,124 |
) |
|
$ |
71,936 |
|
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
Realized loss on derivative instruments |
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
71,224 |
|
|
$ |
(3,124 |
) |
|
$ |
67,105 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Long-Term Debt
Senior secured revolving line of credit. The Company entered into its fourth amendment to its
amended and restated credit agreement (the Amended Credit Facility) on June 16, 2011. The Amended
Credit Facility provides for a senior secured revolving line of credit of up to $600.0 million and
matures on February 26, 2015. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are collateralized by
perfected first priority liens and security interests on substantially all of the Companys assets,
including mortgage liens on oil and natural gas properties having at least 80% of the reserve value
as determined by reserve reports.
Availability under the Amended Credit Facility is restricted to the borrowing base, which is
subject to semi-annual redeterminations on April 1 and October 1 of each year. On January 21, 2011,
a redetermination of the borrowing base under the Companys Amended Credit Facility was completed,
at the request of the Company, in lieu of the April 1, 2011 redetermination. As a result of this
redetermination, the Companys borrowing base increased from $120 million to $150 million, and was
then automatically decreased to $137.5 million in connection with the issuance of the Companys
private placement of $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2019 on February 2, 2011
(discussed below).
Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are subject to varying rates of interest based on
(1) the total outstanding borrowings (including the value of all outstanding letters of credit) in
relation to the borrowing base and (2) whether the loan is a London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) loan or a bank prime interest rate loan (defined in the Amended Credit Facility as an
Alternate Based Rate or ABR loan). The LIBOR and ABR loans bear their respective interest rates
plus the applicable margin indicated in the following table as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
Ratio of Total Outstanding Borrowings to Borrowing Base |
|
for LIBOR Loans |
|
|
for ABR Loans |
|
Less than .50 to 1 |
|
|
2.00% |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
Greater than or equal to .50 to 1 but less than .75 to 1 |
|
|
2.25% |
|
|
|
0.75% |
|
Greater than or equal to .75 to 1 but less than .85 to 1 |
|
|
2.50% |
|
|
|
1.00% |
|
Greater than .85 to 1 but less than or equal 1 |
|
|
2.75% |
|
|
|
1.25% |
|
An ABR loan does not have a set maturity date and may be repaid at any time upon the Company
providing advance notification to the lenders under the Amended Credit Facility (the Lenders).
Interest is paid quarterly on ABR loans based on the number of days an ABR loan is outstanding as
of the last business day in March, June, September and December. The Company has the option to
convert an ABR loan to a LIBOR-based loan upon providing advance notification to the Lenders. The
minimum available loan term is one month and the maximum loan term is six months for LIBOR-based
loans. Interest for LIBOR loans is paid upon maturity of the loan term. Interim interest is paid
every three months for LIBOR loans that have loan terms that are greater than three months in
duration. At the end of a LIBOR loan term, the Amended Credit Facility allows the Company to elect
to continue a LIBOR loan with the same or a differing loan term or convert the borrowing to an ABR
loan.
On a quarterly basis, the Company also pays a 0.50% (as of September 30, 2011) annualized
commitment fee on the average amount of borrowing base capacity not utilized during the quarter and
fees calculated on the average amount of letter of credit balances outstanding during the quarter.
11
The Amended Credit Facility contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
a prohibition against incurring debt, subject to permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
|
a prohibition against making dividends, distributions and redemptions, subject to
permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
|
a prohibition against making investments, loans and advances, subject to permitted
exceptions; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on creating liens and leases on the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries, subject to permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on merging and selling assets outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on use of proceeds, investments, transactions with affiliates or change of
principal business; |
|
|
|
|
a provision limiting oil and natural gas derivative financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the Company not allow a ratio of Total Net Debt (as defined in the
Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated EBITDAX (as defined in the Amended Credit
Facility) to be greater than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four quarters ended on the last day of each
quarter; and |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the Company maintain a Current Ratio (as defined in the Amended
Credit Facility) of consolidated current assets (with exclusions as described in the
Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated current liabilities (with exclusions as described
in the Amended Credit Facility) of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of the last day of any
fiscal quarter. |
The Amended Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If an event of default
occurs and is continuing, the Lenders may declare all amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit
Facility to be immediately due and payable.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings and no outstanding letters of credit
issued under the Amended Credit Facility, resulting in an unused borrowing base capacity of $137.5
million.
Senior unsecured notes. On February 2, 2011, the Company issued $400.0 million of 7.25% senior
unsecured notes (the Notes) due February 1, 2019. Interest is payable on the Notes semi-annually
in arrears on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2011. The Notes are guaranteed on
a senior unsecured basis by the Companys material subsidiaries (Guarantors). These guarantees
are full and unconditional and joint and several among the Guarantors. The issuance of these Notes
resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $390.0 million.
The Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2011 (the Base Indenture),
among the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the Trustee), as amended and
supplemented by the first supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee,
also dated as of February 2, 2011 (the First Supplemental Indenture) and as further amended and
supplemented by the second supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee
(the Second Supplemental Indenture; the Base Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the First
Supplemental Indenture and the Second Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture), dated as of
September 19, 2011.
At any time prior to February 1, 2014, the Company has the option to redeem up to 35% of the
Notes at a redemption price of 107.25% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings so long as the redemption occurs
within 180 days of completing such equity offering and at least 65% of the aggregate principal
amount of the Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Prior to February 1, 2015, the
Company has the option to redeem some or all of the Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to
100% of their principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid
interest to the redemption date. On and after February 1, 2015, the Company has the option to
redeem some or all of the Notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount)
equal to 103.625% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 1, 2015, 101.813% for the twelve-month period beginning February
1, 2016 and 100.00% beginning on February 1, 2017, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date. The Company estimates that the fair value of this option is immaterial at
September 30, 2011.
12
On September 23, 2011, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC to
allow the holders of the Notes to exchange the Notes for registered notes that have substantially
identical terms as the Notes. The Company and the Guarantors will use commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the exchange to be completed within 360 days after the issuance of the Notes.
Under certain circumstances, in lieu of a registered exchange offer, the Company must use
commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes.
If the Company fails to satisfy these obligations on a timely basis, the annual interest borne by
the Notes will be increased by up to 1.0% per annum until the exchange offer is completed or the
shelf registration statement is declared effective.
The Indenture restricts the Companys ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries
to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions
on, redeem or repurchase, equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v)
enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii)
transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications. If
at any time when the Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard & Poors Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the Indenture) has occurred and is
continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and the Company and its subsidiaries will cease
to be subject to such covenants.
The Indenture contains customary events of default, including:
|
|
default in any payment of interest on any Note when due, continued for 30 days; |
|
|
|
default in the payment of principal of or premium, if any, on any Note when due; |
|
|
|
failure by the Company to comply with its other obligations under the
Indenture, in certain cases subject to notice and grace periods; |
|
|
|
payment defaults and accelerations with respect to other indebtedness of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) in the
aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million or more; |
|
|
|
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company or a
Significant Subsidiary (as defined in the Indenture) or group of Restricted
Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary; |
|
|
|
failure by the Company or any Significant Subsidiary or group of Restricted
Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary to
pay certain final judgments aggregating in excess of $10.0 million within 60
days; and |
|
|
|
any guarantee of the Notes by a Guarantor ceases to be in full force and
effect, is declared null and void in a judicial proceeding or is denied or
disaffirmed by its maker. |
Deferred financing costs. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $1.5 million and $8.9
million of deferred financing costs related to the Amended Credit Facility and the Notes,
respectively. The deferred financing costs are included in Deferred costs and other assets on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2011 and are being amortized over
the respective terms of the Amended Credit Facility and the Notes. The amortization of these
deferred financing costs is included in Interest expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
13
8. Asset Retirement Obligations
The following table reflects the changes in the Companys ARO during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARO |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,640 |
|
Liabilities incurred during period |
|
|
2,422 |
|
Liabilities settled during period |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
418 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Income Taxes
Prior to its corporate reorganization in connection with the IPO (see Note 1), the Company was
a limited liability company and not subject to federal or state income tax (in most states).
Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes was recorded prior to the corporate
reorganization as the Companys equity holders were responsible for income tax on the Companys
profits. In connection with the closing of the Companys IPO in June 2010, the Company merged into
a corporation and became subject to federal and state income taxes.
The Companys effective tax rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011
was 37.01% and 37.22%, respectively, which was consistent with the statutory tax rate applicable to
the U.S. and the blended state rate for the states in which the Company conducts business. As of
September 30, 2011, the Company did not have any uncertain tax positions requiring adjustments to
its tax liability.
The Company had deferred tax assets for its federal and state tax loss carryforwards at
September 30, 2011 recorded in noncurrent deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2011,
management determined that a valuation allowance was not required for the tax loss carryforwards as
they are expected to be fully utilized before expiration.
At September 30, 2010, the Companys effective tax rate was 39.4%. The Companys effective tax
rate for this period differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes and
certain non-deductible IPO-related costs recorded in the post-corporate reorganization period. At
September 30, 2010, the Company also increased its estimate of its deferred tax liability from $29.2
million to $35.4 million. After analyzing the book and tax basis differences for capital
expenditure accruals made at June 30, 2010, management determined that an additional deferred tax
liability of $5.2 million was needed as of the date of the corporate reorganization. In addition,
new tax legislation was passed in September 2010, which extended bonus tax depreciation retroactive
to January 1, 2010, resulting in an additional increase of the Companys deferred tax liability of
$0.8 million. These adjustments, along with $0.2 million of other changes in estimates, were
recorded as a discrete deferred tax expense of $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes the Companys income tax expense
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Initial
deferred tax expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,238 |
|
Discrete
adjustments to deferred tax expense |
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
6,206 |
|
Federal and
state income tax |
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
3,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
tax expense |
|
$ |
9,239 |
|
|
$ |
39,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the periods presented. The
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the impact of potentially dilutive
non-vested restricted shares outstanding during the periods presented, unless their effect is
anti-dilutive. There are no adjustments made to income available to common stockholders in the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share.
14
The following is a calculation of the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,060 |
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
92,052 |
|
|
|
33,700 |
|
Dilution effect of stock awards at end of period(1) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,164 |
|
|
|
92,000 |
|
|
|
92,208 |
|
|
|
33,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because the Company reported a net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, no unvested stock awards were included in computing diluted loss per share because the
effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease obligations. On January 12, 2011, the Company executed the fourth amendment to its
office space lease agreement for an additional 11,638 square feet of space within its current
office building. Under the terms of the fourth amendment, the Companys rental obligation for the
new premises commenced on May 1, 2011 and terminates on September 30, 2017. On September 26,
2011, the Company executed the fifth amendment to its office space lease agreement for an additional 27,538 square feet of space within its
current office building. Under the terms of this amendment, the Companys rental obligation for the
new premises will commence once construction is substantially complete, which is projected to be in
January 2012. The fifth amendment to the lease agreement terminates on September 30, 2017. The Companys total
rental commitments under non-cancelable leases for office space and other property and equipment at
September 30, 2011 were $13.0 million.
Drilling contracts. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had certain drilling rig contracts
with initial terms greater than one year. In the event of early contract termination under these
contracts, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately $51.0 million as of September 30,
2011 for the days remaining through the end of the primary terms of the contracts.
Volume commitment agreements. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had certain agreements
with an aggregate requirement to deliver a minimum quantity of approximately 10.4 MMBbl and 8.8 Bcf
from its Williston Basin project areas within a specified timeframe. Future obligations under these
agreements are approximately $35.5 million as of September 30, 2011.
Fracturing services. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had certain agreements with third
party fracturing service companies for an initial term greater than one year. In the event of early
contract termination under these agreements, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately
$41.6 million as of September 30, 2011 for the months remaining through the end of the primary term
of the agreement.
Litigation. The Company is party to various legal and/or regulatory proceedings from time to
time arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes all such matters are without
merit and involve amounts which, if resolved unfavorably, either individually or in the aggregate,
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
12. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
On February 2, 2011, the Company issued $400.0 million of Notes (see Note 7 Long-Term
Debt). The Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors, which are 100% owned
by the Company. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several among the
Guarantors. Certain of the Companys immaterial wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the
Notes (Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Notes were offered and sold to qualified institutional
buyers in reliance on Rule 144A and non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. They have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any state securities laws; however, as
discussed above in Note 7, on September 23, 2011, the Company filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-4 with the SEC to allow the holders of the Notes to exchange the Notes for registered notes
that have substantially identical terms as the Notes. This Registration Statement is pending
approval by the SEC.
15
The following financial information reflects condensed consolidating financial information of
the Company (Issuer) and its Guarantors on a combined basis, prepared on the equity basis of
accounting. The Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are minor and, therefore, not presented separately. The
information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Rule 3-10 under the SECs
Regulation S-X. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of
operations, cash flows or financial position had the Guarantors operated as independent entities.
The Company has not presented separate financial and narrative information for each of the
Guarantors because it believes such financial and narrative information would not provide any
additional information that would be material in evaluating the sufficiency of the Guarantors.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
120,330 |
|
|
$ |
43,271 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
163,601 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
124,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,939 |
|
Accounts receivable oil and gas revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,703 |
|
Accounts receivable joint interest partners |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
56,441 |
|
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
55,115 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817 |
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,284 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
246,149 |
|
|
|
180,712 |
|
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
425,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
983,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983,768 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,825 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion,
amortization and impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
849,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
843,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(843,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,166 |
|
Deferred costs and other assets |
|
|
8,957 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,098,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,676 |
|
|
$ |
(844,753 |
) |
|
$ |
1,314,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
43,905 |
|
|
$ |
(1,406 |
) |
|
$ |
43,825 |
|
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,194 |
|
Revenues and production taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,953 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
82,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,386 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
164,114 |
|
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
168,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(8,739 |
) |
|
|
95,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,291 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
397,430 |
|
|
|
271,737 |
|
|
|
(1,406 |
) |
|
|
667,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
765,639 |
|
|
|
(765,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares
authorized; 92,474,193 issued and 92,453,471
outstanding |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 20,722 shares |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
637,567 |
|
|
|
8,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646,310 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
63,097 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
(77,708 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
701,023 |
|
|
|
788,939 |
|
|
|
(843,347 |
) |
|
|
646,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,098,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,676 |
|
|
$ |
(844,753 |
) |
|
$ |
1,314,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
119,940 |
|
|
$ |
23,580 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,520 |
|
Accounts receivable oil and gas revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,909 |
|
Accounts receivable joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,902 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
28,596 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
120,176 |
|
|
|
86,033 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
205,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,968 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion,
amortization and impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
485,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
605,553 |
|
|
$ |
571,982 |
|
|
$ |
(485,683 |
) |
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
8,198 |
|
|
$ |
(306 |
) |
|
$ |
8,198 |
|
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
Revenues and production taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,239 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
82,263 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
82,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
46,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,432 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
141,012 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
140,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,501 |
|
|
|
(513,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares
authorized; 92,240,345 issued and outstanding |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
634,976 |
|
|
|
8,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643,719 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(29,695 |
) |
|
|
(91,274 |
) |
|
|
28,124 |
|
|
|
(92,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
606,201 |
|
|
|
430,970 |
|
|
|
(485,377 |
) |
|
|
551,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
605,553 |
|
|
$ |
571,982 |
|
|
$ |
(485,683 |
) |
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,596 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
87,596 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,835 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,873 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,859 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
46,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
41,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries |
|
|
71,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,224 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,495 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,786 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
65,232 |
|
|
|
71,175 |
|
|
|
(71,445 |
) |
|
|
64,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
63,950 |
|
|
|
112,730 |
|
|
|
(71,445 |
) |
|
|
105,235 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
(41,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
66,289 |
|
|
$ |
71,445 |
|
|
$ |
(71,445 |
) |
|
$ |
66,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,978 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,978 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
20,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1,329 |
) |
|
|
12,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,124 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
(3,355 |
) |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(2,275 |
) |
|
|
8,805 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(9,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,008 |
) |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
213,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
213,546 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,975 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
111,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3,863 |
) |
|
|
102,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries |
|
|
105,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,105 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(17,909 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,745 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
88,869 |
|
|
|
66,538 |
|
|
|
(105,832 |
) |
|
|
49,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
85,006 |
|
|
|
168,632 |
|
|
|
(105,832 |
) |
|
|
147,806 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
(62,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
$ |
105,832 |
|
|
$ |
(105,832 |
) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,780 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,780 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,112 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
10,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
69,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
|
10,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings in subsidiaries |
|
|
(30,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(30,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
30,336 |
|
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(31,856 |
) |
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
30,336 |
|
|
|
7,824 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(39,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,336 |
) |
|
$ |
30,336 |
|
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash
flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
$ |
105,832 |
|
|
$ |
(105,832 |
) |
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(7,785 |
) |
|
|
62,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,015 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,105 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
Debt discount amortization and other |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
Working capital and other changes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(42,306 |
) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
(41,286 |
) |
Change in inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
Change in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
Change in other current assets |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(337 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
43,056 |
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
47,820 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
93,511 |
|
|
|
152,003 |
|
|
|
(105,832 |
) |
|
|
139,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(386,927 |
) |
Derivative settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(124,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,939 |
) |
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(124,939 |
) |
|
|
(384,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(9,650 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,027 |
) |
Investment in / capital contributions from
affiliates |
|
|
(357,970 |
) |
|
|
252,138 |
|
|
|
105,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
31,818 |
|
|
|
251,761 |
|
|
|
105,832 |
|
|
|
389,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
19,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,081 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
119,940 |
|
|
|
23,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
120,330 |
|
|
$ |
43,271 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
163,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent/ |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,336 |
) |
|
$ |
30,336 |
|
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
39,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,106 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,810 |
|
Debt discount amortization and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
Working capital and other changes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,108 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(22,895 |
) |
Change in inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
Change in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
Change in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
4,887 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
(31,410 |
) |
|
|
31,959 |
|
|
|
30,336 |
|
|
|
30,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,666 |
) |
Derivative settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from members contributions |
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
(235,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
399,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,669 |
|
Proceeds from credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
Principal payments on credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,000 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
Investment in / capital contributions from
affiliates |
|
|
(374,664 |
) |
|
|
405,000 |
|
|
|
(30,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
260,005 |
|
|
|
133,212 |
|
|
|
(30,336 |
) |
|
|
362,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
228,595 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,061 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
228,595 |
|
|
$ |
41,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
269,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated the period after the balance sheet date, noting no subsequent events
or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, other than as
noted below.
Derivative instruments. In October 2011, the Company converted its deferred premium put
contracts for 4,000 barrels of oil per day in calendar year 2012 to three-way costless collar
options. Additionally, the Company added deferred premium put spread contracts for 2,000 barrels
of oil per day in calendar year 2012 and three-way costless collar
options for 1,000 barrels of oil per day in calendar year 2013. The deferred premium put contracts had a total liability of
$4.9 million on the date of execution. As of November 7, 2011, the Company had 8,548 barrels of oil
per day hedged for the remainder of 2011, 13,500 barrels of oil per
day hedged in 2012, and 7,000
barrels of oil per day hedged in 2013. These derivative instruments do not qualify for and were not
designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes.
21
Senior secured revolving line of credit. On October 6, 2011, the Company entered into a fifth
amendment to its amended and restated credit agreement (the Fifth Amendment), among Oasis
Petroleum North America LLC, as
borrower, Oasis Petroleum LLC, Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC and Oasis Well Services LLC, as
wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, and the Company, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto
and BNP Paribas, as administrative agent (the Amended Credit Facility). The Fifth Amendment
reduced the interest rates payable on borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility, extended the
maturity date of the Amended Credit Facility from February 26, 2015 to October 6, 2016, and
increased the Companys senior secured revolving line of credit from $600 million to $1 billion. In
connection with the Fifth Amendment, the semi-annual redetermination of the Companys borrowing
base was completed on October 6, 2011, which resulted in the borrowing base of the Amended Credit
Facility increasing from $137.5 million to $350 million.
Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are subject to varying rates of interest based on
(1) the total outstanding borrowings (including the value of all outstanding letters of credit) in
relation to the borrowing base and (2) whether the loan is a London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) loan or a bank prime interest rate loan (defined in the Amended Credit Facility as an
Alternate Based Rate or ABR loan). The LIBOR and ABR loans bear their respective interest rates
plus the applicable margin indicated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
Ratio of Total Outstanding Borrowings to Borrowing Base |
|
for LIBOR Loans |
|
|
for ABR Loans |
|
Less than .25 to 1 |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .25 to 1 but less than .50 to 1 |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .50 to 1 but less than .75 to 1 |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .75 to 1 but less than .90 to 1 |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .90 to 1 but less than or equal to 1 |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
All other rates, terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Facility dated February 26, 2010
remained the same (see Note 7 Long-Term Debt).
In addition, on October 25, 2011, the Companys lenders in the Amended Credit Facility waived
the mandatory reduction of the Companys borrowing base that otherwise would have occurred as a
result of the issuance of the senior unsecured notes subsequently offered (see Senior unsecured
notes below).
Volume commitment agreements. On October 25, 2011, the Company amended one of its existing
volume commitment agreements for an aggregate requirement to deliver a minimum quantity of
approximately 7.5 Bcf from its Williston Basin project areas within a specified timeframe. The
future obligation under this amended agreement is approximately $18.9 million.
Senior unsecured
notes. On October 27, 2011, the Company issued $400 million of 6.5% senior
unsecured notes due November 1, 2021 (the 2021 Notes). Interest is payable on the 2021 Notes
semi-annually in arrears on each May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2012. The
2021 Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of the Companys
existing material subsidiaries (the Guarantors). The issuance of the 2021 Notes will result in net
proceeds to the Company of approximately $393 million, which the Company will use to fund its
exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes. The issuance
and sale of the 2021 Notes has been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to an
automatic shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-175603), as amended, of
the Company, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011. Closing of the issuance and sale of the 2021
Notes is scheduled for November 10, 2011.
On October 27, 2011, in connection with the issuance of these 2021 Notes, the Company entered
into an underwriting agreement (the Underwriting Agreement) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The
Underwriting Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company
and customary conditions to closing, obligations of the parties and termination provisions.
Additionally, the Company has agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may
be required to make because of any of those liabilities. Furthermore, the Company has agreed with
the underwriters not to offer or sell any debt securities issued or guaranteed by the Company
having a term of more than one year (other than the 2021 Notes) for a period of 60 days after the
date of the Underwriting Agreement without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.
Drilling contracts. On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into a new drilling rig contract
with an initial term greater than one year. In the event of early contract termination under this
new contract, the Company would be obligated to pay a maximum of approximately $15.1 million if
terminated immediately at the beginning of the contract.
22
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (2010 Annual Report), as well as the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, regarding our strategy, future
operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans
and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, the words could, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, may,
continue, predict, potential, project and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying
words. In particular, the factors discussed below and detailed under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
2010 Annual Report, could affect our actual results and cause our actual results to differ
materially from expectations, estimates, or assumptions expressed in, forecasted in, or implied in
such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may include statements about:
|
|
|
cash flows and liquidity; |
|
|
|
financial strategy, budget, projections and operating results; |
|
|
|
oil and natural gas realized prices; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling, completion and production equipment and materials; |
|
|
|
availability of qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
owning and operating a services company; |
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development costs; |
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
drilling and completion of wells; |
|
|
|
infrastructure for salt water disposal; |
|
|
|
gathering, transportation and marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
inclement weather conditions; |
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
effectiveness of our risk management activities;
|
23
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
|
|
|
counterparty credit risk; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation and taxation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries; |
|
|
|
uncertainty regarding our future operating results; |
|
|
|
estimated future net reserves and present value thereof; and |
|
|
|
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not
historical. |
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise these statements unless required by Securities
law, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although we
believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the
forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are reasonable, we can
give no assurance that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Some of the key
factors which could cause actual results to vary from our expectations include changes in oil and
natural gas prices, the timing of planned capital expenditures, availability of acquisitions,
uncertainties in estimating proved reserves and forecasting production results, operational factors
affecting the commencement or maintenance of producing wells, the condition of the capital markets
generally, as well as our ability to access them, the proximity to and capacity of transportation
facilities, and uncertainties regarding environmental regulations or litigation and other legal or
regulatory developments affecting our business, as well as those factors discussed below and
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, all of which are difficult to predict. In light of
these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur.
These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf.
Overview
We are an independent exploration and production company focused on the development and
acquisition of unconventional oil and natural gas resources primarily in the Williston Basin. Since
our inception, we have emphasized the acquisition of properties that provide current production and
significant upside potential through further development. Our drilling activity is primarily
directed toward projects that we believe can provide us with repeatable successes in the Bakken
formation.
Our use of capital for acquisitions and development allows us to direct our capital resources
to what we believe to be the most attractive opportunities as market conditions evolve. We have
historically acquired properties that we believe will meet or exceed our rate of return criteria.
For acquisitions of properties with additional development, exploitation and exploration potential,
we have focused on acquiring properties that we expect to operate so that we can control the timing
and implementation of capital spending. In some instances, we have acquired non-operated property
interests at what we believe to be attractive rates of return either because they provided a
foothold in a new area of interest or complemented our existing operations. We intend to continue
to acquire both operated and non-operated properties to the extent we believe they meet our return
objectives. In addition, our willingness to acquire non-operated properties in new areas provides
us with geophysical and geologic data that may lead to further acquisitions in the same area,
whether on an operated or non-operated basis.
Due to the geographic concentration of our oil and natural gas properties in the Williston
Basin, we believe the primary sources of opportunities, challenges and risks related to our
business for both the short and long-term are:
|
|
|
Commodity prices for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
Transportation capacity; |
|
|
|
Availability and cost of services; and |
|
|
|
Availability of qualified personnel. |
Our revenue, profitability and future growth rate depend substantially on factors beyond our
control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments as well as competition from other
sources of energy. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and may fluctuate
widely in the future. Sustained periods of low
prices for oil or natural gas could materially and adversely affect our financial position,
our results of operations, the quantities of oil and natural gas reserves that we can economically
produce and our access to capital.
24
Prices for oil and natural gas can fluctuate significantly in response to relatively minor
changes in the global and regional supply of and demand for oil and natural gas. We enter into
crude oil sales contracts with purchasers who have access to crude oil transportation capacity,
utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our commodity price risk, and enter into
physical delivery contracts to manage our price differentials.
Our ability to develop and hold our existing undeveloped leasehold acreage is primarily
dependent upon having access to drilling rigs and completion services. The utilization of existing
drilling rigs and of existing completion service equipment in the Williston Basin is at an all-time
high. This has resulted in drilling rigs, completion equipment and crews being imported from Canada
and other parts of the United States. To ensure access to drilling rigs, we have entered into
fixed-term drilling rig contracts for periods of up to three years and currently have nine drilling
rigs under contract. We also enter into service contracts to ensure the availability of completion
services and the timely fracture stimulation of newly drilled wells. Our large concentrated acreage
position potentially provides us with a multi-year inventory of drilling projects and requires some
forward planning visibility for obtaining services.
Third Quarter 2011 Highlights:
|
|
|
Completed and placed on production 22 gross operated wells (17.4 net) in the
Bakken and Three Forks formations during the three months ended September 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
Drilling 7 gross operated wells (5.4 net) in the Bakken and Three Forks
formations at September 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
21 gross operated wells (15.6 net) waiting on completion in the Bakken and Three
Forks formations as of September 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
Average daily production of 11,583 Boe per day during the three months ended
September 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
Exploration and production capital expenditures of $198.9 million, consisting
primarily of $189.4 million in drilling expenditures during the three months ended
September 30, 2011. |
Results of Operations
Revenues
Our revenues are derived from the sale of oil and natural gas production and do not include
the effects of derivative instruments. Our revenues may vary significantly from period to period as
a result of changes in volumes of production sold or changes in commodity prices.
The following table summarizes our revenues and production data for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating results (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
85,870 |
|
|
$ |
32,082 |
|
|
$ |
53,788 |
|
|
$ |
208,442 |
|
|
$ |
76,641 |
|
|
$ |
131,801 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
5,104 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas revenues |
|
|
87,596 |
|
|
|
32,978 |
|
|
|
54,618 |
|
|
|
213,546 |
|
|
|
79,780 |
|
|
|
133,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Oil equivalents (MBoe) |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Average daily production (Boe/d) |
|
|
11,583 |
|
|
|
5,507 |
|
|
|
6,076 |
|
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
Average sales prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, without realized derivatives (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
83.52 |
|
|
$ |
66.42 |
|
|
$ |
17.10 |
|
|
$ |
86.58 |
|
|
$ |
67.58 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
Oil, with
realized derivatives (per Bbl) (1) |
|
|
83.35 |
|
|
|
66.42 |
|
|
|
16.93 |
|
|
|
84.58 |
|
|
|
67.53 |
|
|
|
17.05 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
|
7.66 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized prices include realized gains or losses on cash settlements for commodity
derivatives, which do not qualify for and were not designated as hedging instruments for
accounting purposes. |
25
Three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to three months ended September 30, 2010
Oil and natural gas revenues. Our oil and natural gas sales revenues increased $54.6 million,
or 166%, to $87.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2010. Our revenues are a function of oil and natural gas production
volumes sold and average sales prices received for those volumes. Average daily production sold
increased by 6,076 Boe per day, or 110%, to 11,583 Boe per day during the three months ended
September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
average daily production sold was primarily a result of our well completions during the last
quarter of 2010 and the first three quarters of 2011. Well completions in our West Williston, East
Nesson and Sanish project areas increased average daily production by approximately 6,063 Boe per
day, 1,317 Boe per day and 784 Boe per day, respectively, during the third quarter of 2011 as
compared to the third quarter of 2010. The higher production amounts sold increased revenues by
$46.2 million, and the remaining $8.4 million increase in revenues was attributable to higher oil
and gas sales prices during the three months ended September 30, 2011. Average oil sales prices,
without realized derivatives, increased by $17.10/Bbl, or 26%, to an average of $83.52/Bbl for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to nine months ended September 30, 2010
Oil and natural gas revenues. Our oil and natural gas sales revenues increased $133.8 million,
or 168%, to $213.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our revenues are a function of oil and natural gas
production volumes sold and average sales prices received for those volumes. Average daily
production sold increased by 4,772 Boe per day, or 108%, to 9,201 Boe per day
during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The increase in average daily production sold was primarily a result of our well completions
during the last quarter of 2010 and the first three quarters of 2011. These well completions in our
West Williston, East Nesson and Sanish project areas increased average daily production by
approximately 3,599 Boe per day, 974 Boe per day and 545 Boe per day,
respectively, during the first nine months of 2011. The higher production amounts sold increased
revenues by $111.7 million, and the remaining $22.1 million increase in
revenues was attributable to higher oil and gas sales prices during the nine months ended September
30, 2011. Average oil sales prices, without realized derivatives, increased by $19.00/Bbl, or 28%,
to an average of $86.58/Bbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
26
Expenses
|
|
The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the periods indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per Boe of production) |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
9,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
21,975 |
|
|
$ |
9,112 |
|
|
$ |
12,863 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
|
|
8,131 |
|
|
|
13,910 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
20,859 |
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
11,106 |
|
|
|
47,771 |
|
|
|
24,385 |
|
|
|
23,386 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
(8,496 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
(5,200 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
19,870 |
|
|
|
12,107 |
|
|
|
7,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
47,323 |
|
|
$ |
22,147 |
|
|
$ |
25,176 |
|
|
$ |
115,315 |
|
|
$ |
70,780 |
|
|
$ |
44,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
40,273 |
|
|
|
10,831 |
|
|
|
29,442 |
|
|
|
98,231 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
89,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative
instruments |
|
|
71,224 |
|
|
|
(3,124 |
) |
|
|
74,348 |
|
|
|
67,105 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
67,280 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,786 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(6,550 |
) |
|
|
(18,745 |
) |
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
(17,662 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
64,962 |
|
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
68,255 |
|
|
|
49,575 |
|
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
50,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
105,235 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
97,697 |
|
|
|
147,806 |
|
|
|
7,824 |
|
|
|
139,982 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
38,946 |
|
|
|
9,239 |
|
|
|
29,707 |
|
|
|
55,015 |
|
|
|
39,106 |
|
|
|
15,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
66,289 |
|
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
$ |
67,990 |
|
|
$ |
92,791 |
|
|
$ |
(31,282 |
) |
|
$ |
124,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expense (per Boe of
production): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
9.23 |
|
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
8.75 |
|
|
$ |
7.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
8.33 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
19.57 |
|
|
|
19.25 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
19.02 |
|
|
|
20.17 |
|
|
|
(1.15 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
(4.30 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
9.57 |
|
|
|
(2.71 |
) |
|
|
7.91 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
Three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to three months ended September 30, 2010
Lease operating expenses. Lease operating expenses increased $6.6 million to $9.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. This
increase was due to an increased number of producing wells and increased water production period
over period. The unit operating costs increased from $6.33 per Boe for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 to $9.23 per Boe for the three months ended September 30, 2011, primarily as a
result of increased costs associated with salt water trucking and disposal and the continuing
effects of the inclement weather during the second quarter of 2011. We have $35 million of capital
in our 2011 budget allocated to building salt water disposal infrastructure, which is currently
being deployed in our key operating areas. This infrastructure is expected to eliminate the need
for trucks, simplify operational logistics and reduce costs in 2012 by $2.00 to $3.00 per Boe from
current levels.
Production taxes. Our production taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were
10.1% and 10.7%, respectively, as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales. The 2011 production
tax rate was lower than the 2010 production tax rate primarily due to certain new wells in Montana
that are subject to lower incentivized production tax rates.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A). DD&A expense increased $11.1 million to $20.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September
30, 2010. The increase in DD&A expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily
due to the 110% increase in production for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to
the same quarter in 2010.
27
Impairment of oil and gas properties. During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we
recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for unproved
property leases that expired during the period. No impairment charges of proved oil and gas
properties were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
General and administrative expenses. Our general and administrative expenses increased $2.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $4.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010. Of this increase, approximately $2.4 million was due to the impact of our
organizational growth on employee compensation and $0.5 million was due to the amortization of our
restricted stock awards, offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in legal and printing costs related
to our IPO incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, we
had 106 full-time employees compared to 55 full-time employees as of September 30, 2010.
Derivative instruments. As a result of our derivative activities, we incurred cash settlement net
losses of $179 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and no cash settlements for
the three months ended September 30, 2010. In addition, as a result of forward oil price changes,
we recognized a $71.4 million non-cash unrealized mark-to-market derivative gain and a $3.1 million
non-cash unrealized mark-to-market derivative loss during the three months ended September 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $6.6 million to $6.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was
the result of interest related to our senior unsecured notes issued in February 2011 at an interest
rate of 7.25%. There were no borrowings under our revolving credit facility during the three months
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Income taxes. Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was recorded at
39.4% of pre-tax net income. In addition, we recorded a $6.2 million discrete deferred tax expense
in September 2010 for changes in estimates to our deferred tax liability for the initial book and
tax basis differences recorded at the time of our corporate reorganization in June 2010 (see Note 9
Income Taxes). Our income tax expense was $38.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2011, resulting in an effective tax rate of 37.01%. Our effective tax rate is expected to continue
to closely approximate the statutory rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate of the
states in which we conduct business.
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2010
Lease operating expenses. Lease operating expenses increased $12.9 million to $22.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This
increase was primarily due to an increased number of producing wells from our West Williston
acquisitions that were completed in the fourth quarter of 2010 and to our well completions during
the last quarter of 2010 and the first three quarters of 2011. The unit operating costs increased
from $7.54 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $8.75 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, primarily due to increased costs associated with water production, salt water
disposal and the continuing effects of the inclement weather during the first half of 2011. We have
$35 million of capital in our 2011 budget allocated to building salt water disposal infrastructure,
which is currently being deployed in our key operating areas. This infrastructure is expected to
eliminate the need for trucks, simplify operational logistics and reduce costs in 2012 by $2.00 to
$3.00 per Boe from current levels.
Production taxes. Our production taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were
relatively consistent at 10.3% and 10.2%, respectively, as a percentage of oil and natural gas
sales.
DD&A. DD&A expense increased $23.4 million to $47.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in DD&A expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to the production increases from the West
Williston acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter of 2010 and to our well completions during
2010 and the first three quarters of 2011. The DD&A rate for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 was $19.02 per Boe compared to $20.17 per Boe for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
This decrease in the DD&A rate was due to the lower cost of reserve additions associated with our
2010 acquisition and drilling activities over the last quarter of 2010 and the first three quarters
of 2011.
28
Impairment of oil and gas properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we
recorded non-cash impairment charges of $3.3 million and $11.8 million, respectively, for unproved
property leases that expired during these periods. No impairment charges of proved oil and gas
properties were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Stock-based compensation expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a $5.2
million non-cash charge for stock-based compensation expense associated with OP Managements grant
of 1.0 million Class C Unit Interests (C Units). The C Units were granted on March 24, 2010 to
individuals who were employed by us as of February 1, 2010 and who were not executive officers or
key employees with an existing capital investment in OP Management. The C Units were membership
interests in OP Management and not direct interests in us. The C Units were non-transferable, had
no voting power and vested immediately on the grant date. Based on the characteristics of these
awards, we concluded that they represented equity-type awards and we accounted for the value of
these awards as if they had been awarded by us. We used fair-value-based methods to determine the
value of stock-based compensation awarded to our employees and recognized the entire amount as
expense due to the immediate vesting of the awards, with no future requisite service period
required by the employees. As of December 31, 2010, OP Management had distributed substantially all
cash or requisite common stock to its members based on membership interests and distribution
percentages. No stock-based compensation expense was recorded for the nine months ended September
30, 2011 related to the C Units.
General and administrative. Our general and administrative expenses increased $7.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Of this increase, approximately $5.9 million was due to the impact of our organizational
growth on employee compensation and $2.0 million was due to the amortization of our restricted
stock awards, offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in legal costs related to our IPO incurred
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, we had 106 full-time
employees compared to 55 full-time employees as of September 30, 2010.
Derivative instruments. As a result of our derivative activities, we incurred cash settlement net
losses of $4.8 million and $59 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. In addition, as a result of forward oil price changes, we recognized a $71.9 million
non-cash unrealized mark-to-market derivative gain and a $0.1 million non-cash unrealized
mark-to-market derivative loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased by $17.7 million to $18.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was
the result of interest related to our senior unsecured notes issued in February 2011 at an interest
rate of 7.25%. There were no borrowings under our revolving credit facility during the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to a weighted average outstanding debt balance of $20.5 million
at a weighted average interest rate of 3.11% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Income taxes. Prior to our corporate reorganization, we were a limited liability company not
subject to entity level income tax. In connection with the closing of our IPO in June 2010, we
merged into a corporation and became subject to federal and state entity-level taxation. In
connection with our corporate reorganization, an initial net deferred tax liability of $29.2
million was established for differences between the tax and book basis of our assets and
liabilities and a corresponding deferred tax expense was recorded in our Consolidated Statement of
Operations. Subsequent to our corporate reorganization, we recorded federal and state income tax
expense of $3.7 million at an effective tax rate of 39.4% on pre-tax income and a $6.2 million
discrete deferred tax expense in September 2010 for changes in estimates on our deferred tax
liability for the initial book and tax basis differences recorded in June 2010 (see Note 9
Income Taxes). Our income tax expense was $55.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011, resulting in an effective tax rate of 37.22%. Our effective tax rate is expected to continue
to closely approximate the statutory rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate of the
states in which we conduct business.
29
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity as of the date of this report have been proceeds from our IPO
in June 2010, proceeds from our private placement of senior unsecured notes in February 2011,
borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, cash flows from operations and capital contributions from private investors
prior to our IPO. Our primary use of capital has been for the acquisition, development and
exploration of oil and natural gas properties. We continually monitor potential capital sources,
including equity and debt financings, in order to meet our planned capital expenditures and
liquidity requirements. Our future success in growing proved reserves and production will be highly
dependent on our ability to access outside sources of capital.
Our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
139,682 |
|
|
$ |
30,885 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(509,012 |
) |
|
|
(164,705 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
389,411 |
|
|
|
362,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,081 |
|
|
$ |
229,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Our cash flows depend on many factors, including the price of oil and natural gas and the
success of our development and exploration activities as well as future acquisitions. We actively
manage our exposure to commodity price fluctuations by executing derivative transactions to
mitigate the change in oil prices on a portion of our production, thereby mitigating our exposure
to oil price declines, but these transactions may also limit our cash flow in periods of rising oil
prices.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $139.7 million and $30.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by
operating activities for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 2010 was primarily the
result of an increase in oil and natural gas production of 108% and an increase in average oil
sales prices, without realized derivatives, of 28%. In addition, at September 30, 2011, we had a
working capital surplus of $256.6 million. This surplus was primarily attributable to our cash and
short-term investment balances as a result of the net proceeds from the issuance of our senior
unsecured notes in February 2011.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $509.0 million and $164.7 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010 of $344.3 million was
attributable to increased levels of capital expenditures for drilling, development and acquisition
costs and purchases of short-term investments.
Our capital expenditures for drilling, development and acquisition costs are summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Project Area: |
|
|
|
|
West Williston |
|
$ |
316,106 |
|
East Nesson |
|
|
64,947 |
|
Sanish |
|
|
18,147 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2) |
|
$ |
399,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents data relating to our properties in the Barnett shale. |
|
(2) |
|
Capital expenditures reflected in the table above differ from the amounts shown in the
statement of cash flows in our condensed consolidated financial statements because amounts
reflected in the table above include changes in accrued liabilities from the previous
reporting period for capital expenditures, while the amounts presented in
the statement of cash flows are presented on a cash basis. The capital expenditures amount
presented in the statement of cash flows also includes cash paid for other property and
equipment as well as cash paid for asset retirement obligations. |
30
On August 1, 2011, our Board of Directors increased our total 2011 capital expenditure budget
from $490 million to $627 million. Our exploration and production budget increased by $97 million
to $587 million, and consists of:
|
|
|
$527 million for drilling and completing operated and
non-operated wells; and |
|
|
|
$60 million for maintaining and expanding our leasehold position, constructing
infrastructure to support production in our core project areas, micro-seismic work,
purchasing seismic data and other test work. |
Additionally, the revised 2011 budget includes expenditures related to our newly formed
subsidiary, OWS, totaling $24 million for equipment and materials related to start-up costs
necessary to provide select well services to OPNA. The 2011 budget also includes $16 million of
other non-exploration and production capital expenditures for an operations building in Williston,
North Dakota, and other equipment.
While we have budgeted $627 million for these purposes, the ultimate amount of capital we will
expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions and the success of our drilling and
operations results as the year progresses. We believe that the net proceeds from our offering of
senior unsecured notes of approximately $393 million, which
will close on November 10,
2011, together with our cash on hand, short-term investments and cash flows from operating
activities should be sufficient to fund our 2011 capital expenditure budget. However, because the
operated wells funded by our 2011 drilling plan represent only a small percentage of our gross
identified drilling locations, we may be required to generate or raise multiples of this amount of
capital to develop our entire inventory of identified drilling locations should we elect to do so.
Our capital budget may be adjusted as business conditions warrant. The amount, timing and
allocation of capital expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control. If oil and
natural gas prices decline or costs increase significantly, we could defer a significant portion of
our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to prioritize capital projects that we
believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flows. We
routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices,
availability of financing, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of
regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in drilling activities,
contractual obligations, internally generated cash flows and other factors both within and outside
our control.
Cash flows provided by financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $389.4 million and $362.9 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, cash sourced through financing activities was primarily provided by the net
proceeds from the issuance of our senior unsecured notes in February 2011. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, cash sourced through financing activities was primarily provided by net
proceeds from the sale of common stock in our IPO.
Senior secured revolving line of credit. On October 6, 2011, we entered into our fifth
amendment to our Amended Credit Facility. This amendment reduced the interest rates payable on our
borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility, extended the maturity date of the Amended Credit
Facility from February 26, 2015 to October 6, 2016, and increased our senior secured revolving line
of credit from $600 million to $1 billion. In connection with this amendment, the semi-annual
redetermination of our borrowing base was completed on October 6, 2011, which resulted in the
borrowing base of our Amended Credit Facility increasing from $137.5 million to $350 million.
Borrowings under our Amended Credit Facility are collateralized by perfected first priority liens
and security interests on substantially all of our assets, including mortgage liens on oil and
natural gas properties having at least 80% of the reserve value as determined by reserve reports.
At our election, interest is generally determined by reference to (i) the London interbank offered
rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 1.50% and 2.50% per annum; or (ii) a domestic
bank prime rate plus an applicable margin between 0.00% and 1.00% per annum.
31
As of September 30, 2011, we had no borrowings and no outstanding letters of credit under the
Amended Credit Facility. The Amended Credit Facility also contains certain financial covenants and
customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders under our
Amended Credit Facility may declare all amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility to be
immediately due and payable. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the financial
covenants of the Amended Credit Facility.
Senior unsecured notes. On February 2, 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 7.25% senior
unsecured notes due February 1, 2019 (the Notes). Interest is payable on the notes semi-annually
in arrears on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2011. These notes are guaranteed
on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these notes resulted in
net proceeds to us of approximately $390 million, which we are using to fund our exploration,
development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
The Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2011 (the Base Indenture),
among the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the Trustee), as amended and
supplemented by the first supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee,
also dated as of February 2, 2011 (the First Supplemental Indenture) and as further amended and
supplemented by the second supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee
(the Second Supplemental Indenture; the Base Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the First
Supplemental Indenture and the Second Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture), dated as of
September 19, 2011.
On September 23,
2011, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 with the SEC to
allow the holders of the Notes to exchange the Notes for registered notes that have substantially
identical terms as the Notes. We and the Guarantors will use commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the exchange to be completed within 360 days after the issuance of the Notes.
Under certain circumstances, in lieu of a registered exchange offer,
we must use
commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes.
If we fail to satisfy these obligations on a timely basis, the annual interest borne by
the Notes will be increased by up to 1.0% per annum until the exchange offer is completed or the
shelf registration statement is declared effective.
The Indenture restricts the Companys ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries
to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions
on, redeem or repurchase, equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v)
enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii)
transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to certain exceptions and qualifications. If
at any time when the Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and
Standard & Poors Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the Indenture) has occurred and is
continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and the Company and its subsidiaries will cease
to be subject to such covenants. The Indenture also contains customary events of default.
In order to continue funding the needs of our future capital expenditure program, on
October 27, 2011, we issued $400 million of 6.5% senior unsecured notes due November 1, 2021 (the 2021
Notes). Interest is payable on the 2021 Notes semi-annually in arrears on each May 1 and November
1 of each year, beginning on May 1, 2012. The 2021 Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a
senior unsecured basis by all of our existing material subsidiaries (the Guarantors). The
issuance of the 2021 Notes will result in net proceeds to us of approximately $393 million, which we
will use to fund our exploration, development and acquisition program and for general corporate
purposes. The issuance and sale of the 2021 Notes has been registered under the Securities Act of
1933 pursuant to our automatic shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-175603), as amended, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011. Closing of the issuance and sale of
the 2021 Notes is scheduled for November 10, 2011.
On October 27, 2011, in connection with the issuance of these 2021 Notes, we entered into an
underwriting agreement (the Underwriting Agreement) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The
Underwriting Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by us and
customary conditions to closing, obligations of the parties and termination provisions.
Additionally, we agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required
to make because of any of those liabilities. Furthermore, we agreed with the underwriters not to
offer or sell any debt securities issued or guaranteed by us having a term of more than one year
(other than the 2021 Notes) for a period of 60 days after the date of the Underwriting Agreement
without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
See Note 5 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of
our money market funds and derivative instruments and their related fair value measurements. See
also Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk below.
32
Contractual Obligations
We have the following contractual obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2011 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
2-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
$ |
13,002 |
|
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
|
$ |
4,404 |
|
|
$ |
4,503 |
|
|
$ |
2,272 |
|
Drilling rig commitments (1) |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
34,795 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Volume commitment agreements (1) |
|
|
35,483 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
11,242 |
|
|
|
23,310 |
|
Fracturing service agreements (1) |
|
|
41,625 |
|
|
|
36,375 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes (2) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Asset retirement obligations (3) |
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
552,676 |
|
|
$ |
52,662 |
|
|
$ |
46,319 |
|
|
$ |
18,834 |
|
|
$ |
434,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
description of our operating leases, drilling rig commitments, volume commitment agreements
and fracturing service agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
description of our senior unsecured notes. As of September 30, 2011, we had no balance
outstanding under our Amended Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts represent our estimate of future asset retirement obligations on an
undiscounted basis. Because these costs typically extend many years into the future, estimating these future costs
requires management
to make estimates and judgments that are subject to future revisions based upon numerous
factors, including
the rate of inflation, changing technology and the political and regulatory environment. See
Note 8 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from
those disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report other than those noted below.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company invests in certain money market funds, commercial paper and time deposits, all of
which are stated at fair value. The Company classifies all such investments with original maturity
dates less than 90 days as cash equivalents. The Company classifies all such investments with
original maturity dates greater than 90 days as held-to-maturity securities based on managements
intentions to hold the investments to their maturity date.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock shares represent shares withheld by the Company equivalent to the payroll tax
withholding obligations due from employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. The Company
includes the withheld shares as Treasury Stock on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and
separately pays the payroll tax obligation. These retained shares are not part of a publicly
announced program to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock and are accounted for at cost.
The Company does not have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of common stock.
Capitalized Interest
The Company capitalizes a portion of its interest expense incurred on its outstanding debt.
The amount capitalized is determined by multiplying the capitalization rate by the average amount
of eligible accumulated capital expenditures and is limited to actual interest costs incurred
during the period. The accumulated capital expenditures included in the capitalization of interest
calculation begin when the first costs are incurred and end when the asset is either placed into
production or written off.
33
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair value. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04).
ASU 2011-04
changes some fair value measurement principles under U.S. GAAP, including a change in the valuation
premise and the application of premiums and discounts. It also contains some new disclosure
requirements under U.S. GAAP. It is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a significant impact
on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
Comprehensive income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income
(Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05), which requires an entity to
present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two
separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for
items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where
the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The
new standard does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when
an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. On October 21, 2011, the
FASB decided to propose a deferral of the new requirement to present reclassifications of other
comprehensive income on the face of the income statement. ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will be applied retrospectively. We do not
expect the adoption of this new guidance to have any impact on our financial position, cash flows
or results of operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The following market risk disclosures should be read in conjunction with the quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in our 2010 Annual Report, as well as with the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
We are exposed to a variety of market risks including commodity price risk, interest rate risk
and counterparty and customer risk. We address these risks through a program of risk management,
including the use of derivative instruments.
Commodity price exposure risk. We are exposed to market risk as the prices of oil and natural
gas fluctuate as a result of changes in supply and demand and other factors. To partially reduce
price risk caused by these market fluctuations, we have entered into derivative instruments in the
past and expect to enter into derivative instruments in the future to cover a significant portion
of our future production.
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in oil prices.
As of September 30, 2011, we utilized two-way and three-way collar options and deferred premium
puts to reduce the volatility of oil prices on a significant portion of our future expected oil
production. A two-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call and a purchased put. The
purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor) and the sold call establishes a maximum price
(ceiling) we will receive for the volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of
options: a sold call, a purchased put and a sold put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price
(floor), unless the market price falls below the sold put (sub-floor), at which point the minimum
price would be NYMEX-WTI plus the difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike
price. The sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) we will receive for the volumes under
contract. For the deferred premium puts, we pay a premium to the counterparty in exchange for the
sale of the instrument. If the index price is below the floor price of the put, we receive the
difference between the floor price and the index price multiplied by the contract volumes less the
premium. If the index price settles at or above the floor price of the put, we pay only the
premium.
We recognize all derivative instruments at fair value; however, certain of our derivative
instruments have a deferred premium put option, which reduces the asset or increases the liability,
depending on the fair value of the derivative instrument. The credit standing of our counterparties
is analyzed and factored into the fair value amounts recognized on the balance sheet. Derivative
assets and liabilities arising from our derivative contracts with the same counterparty are also
reported on a net basis, as all counterparty contracts provide for net settlement.
34
The following is a summary of our derivative contracts as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Sub- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
Derivative |
|
Oil |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Instrument |
|
(Barrels) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Floor Price |
|
|
Ceiling Price |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Fair Value Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
732,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.10 |
|
|
$ |
106.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,064 |
|
2011 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
45,500 |
|
|
$ |
60.00 |
|
|
$ |
80.00 |
|
|
$ |
94.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
2012 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,756,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.49 |
|
|
$ |
106.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,391 |
|
2012 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
1,020,500 |
|
|
$ |
69.03 |
|
|
$ |
89.03 |
|
|
$ |
113.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,356 |
|
2012 |
|
Put |
|
|
1,340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
12,829 |
|
2013 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
807,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89.23 |
|
|
$ |
111.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,982 |
|
2013 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
761,000 |
|
|
$ |
72.09 |
|
|
$ |
92.09 |
|
|
$ |
124.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
2013 |
|
Put |
|
|
124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
2014 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
112.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766 |
|
2014 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
$ |
72.50 |
|
|
$ |
92.50 |
|
|
$ |
126.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk. We had $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes outstanding at
September 30, 2011, which have a fixed cash interest rate of 7.25% per annum. During the first nine
months of 2011, we had no indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility. We may
utilize interest rate derivatives to alter interest rate exposure in an attempt to reduce interest
rate expense related to existing debt issued under our revolving credit facility. Interest rate
derivatives would be used solely to modify interest rate exposure and not to modify the overall
leverage of the debt portfolio.
Counterparty and customer credit risk. Joint interest receivables arise from billing entities
which own partial interest in the wells we operate. These entities participate in our wells
primarily based on their ownership in leases on which we choose to drill. We have limited ability
to control participation in our wells. We are also subject to credit risk due to concentration of
our oil and natural gas receivables with several significant customers. The inability or failure of
our significant customers to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may
adversely affect our financial results. In addition, our oil and natural gas derivative
arrangements expose us to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. However, in
order to mitigate the risk of nonperformance, we only enter into derivative contracts with
counterparties that are high credit-quality financial institutions, all of which are lenders under
our revolving credit facility. This risk is also managed by spreading our derivative exposure
across several institutions and limiting the hedged volumes placed under individual contracts.
While we do not require all of our customers to post collateral and we do not have a formal
process in place to evaluate and assess the credit standing of our significant customers for oil
and natural gas receivables and the counterparties on our derivative instruments, we do evaluate
the credit standing of such counterparties as we deem appropriate under the circumstances. This
evaluation may include reviewing a counterpartys credit rating, latest financial information and,
in the case of a customer with which we have receivables, their historical payment record, the
financial ability of the customers parent company to make payment if the customer cannot and
undertaking the due diligence necessary to determine credit terms and credit limits. Several of our
significant customers for oil and natural gas receivables have a credit rating below investment
grade or do not have rated debt securities. In these circumstances, we have considered the lack of
investment grade credit rating in addition to the other factors described above.
35
The counterparties on our derivative instruments currently in place are lenders under our
revolving credit facility with investment grade ratings. We are likely to enter into any future
derivative instruments with these or other lenders under our revolving credit facility, which also
carry investment grade ratings. Furthermore, the agreements with each of the counterparties on our
derivative instruments contain netting provisions. As a result of these netting provisions, our
maximum amount of loss due to credit risk is limited to the net amounts due to and from the
counterparties under the derivative contracts. The Company had a net derivative asset position of
approximately $61.5 million at September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Prior to the completion of our
IPO, we were a private company with limited accounting personnel to adequately execute our
accounting processes and other supervisory resources with which to address our internal control
over financial reporting. As previously discussed in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of our 2010
Annual Report, we did not maintain an effective control environment in that the design and
execution of our controls did not consistently result in effective review and supervision by
individuals with financial reporting oversight roles. The lack of adequate staffing levels resulted
in insufficient time spent on review and approval of certain information used to prepare our
financial statements, which resulted in certain control deficiencies. We concluded that these
control deficiencies constituted a material weakness in our control environment.
Remediation activities. Although remediation efforts are still in progress, management has
taken steps to address the cause of the material weakness by putting into place new accounting
processes and control procedures. In addition, we have hired additional accounting and financial
reporting staff since our IPO, implemented additional analysis and reconciliation procedures and
increased the levels of review and approval. Additionally, we have begun taking steps to
comprehensively document and analyze our system of internal control over financial reporting in
preparation for our first management report on internal control over financial reporting required
in connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Management will continue to evaluate the design and effectiveness of these control changes in
conjunction with its ongoing evaluation, review, formalization and testing of our internal control
environment over the remainder of 2011. We will not complete our review until after this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q is filed. We cannot predict the outcome of our review at this time. During the
course of the review, we may identify additional control deficiencies, which could give rise to
additional significant deficiencies and other material weaknesses.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2011. Our disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required
to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC. In light of the previously identified material weakness described above, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2011.
Notwithstanding the existence of the material weakness, management concluded that the financial
statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for
all periods presented.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. As our remediation efforts are still in
progress, as described above, there were changes in our system of internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred
during the three months ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
See Part I, Item 1, Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
entitled Commitments and Contingencies, which is incorporated in this item by reference.
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our
other SEC filings could have a material impact on our business, financial position or results of
operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations.
For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information in Item 1A.
Risk Factors in our 2010 Annual Report. Except for the risk factors set forth below, there have
been no material changes in our risk factors from those described in our 2010 Annual Report.
Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could
result in increased costs to producers and additional operating restrictions or delays, which could
adversely affect our production.
Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production
of natural gas and/or oil from dense subsurface rock formations. The process involves the
injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into the formation to fracture the
surrounding rock and stimulate production. The process is typically regulated by state oil and
natural gas commissions. However, the EPA recently asserted federal regulatory authority over
certain hydraulic fracturing activities involving diesel under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act
(the SDWA) and has begun the process of drafting guidance documents related to this newly
asserted regulatory authority. In addition, legislation has been introduced before Congress,
called the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act, to provide for federal
regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the hydraulic
fracturing process. At the state level, some states have adopted and other states are considering
adopting regulations that could restrict hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances. For
instance, effective August 26, 2011, Montana adopted hydraulic fracturing disclosure regulations
pursuant to which well operators must provide information in drilling permit applications on the
estimated volume and types of materials to be used in the proposed hydraulic fracturing activities.
Upon completion of the well, well operators must provide the Montana Board of Oil and Gas
Conservation with the volume and type of chemicals used, including the additive type, chemical
ingredient names, and Chemical Abstracts Number, subject to certain trade secret protections. In
September 2011, the North Dakota Industrial Commission proposed new regulations for hydraulic
fracturing activities that could require well operators, under certain circumstances, to disclose
the hydraulic fluid composition, including the trade name, supplier, ingredients, Chemical
Abstracts Number, and the maximum ingredient concentrations of all additives in the hydraulic
fracturing fluid. In
the event that new or more stringent federal, state or local legal restrictions are adopted in
areas where we operate, we could incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such
requirements, experience delays or curtailment in the pursuit of exploration, development, or
production activities, and perhaps even be precluded from the drilling of wells.
In addition, there are certain governmental reviews either underway or being proposed that
focus on environmental aspects of hydraulic fracturing practices. The White House Council on
Environmental Quality is coordinating an administration-wide review of hydraulic fracturing
practices, and a committee of the United States House of Representatives has conducted an
investigation of hydraulic fracturing practices. Furthermore, a number of federal agencies are
analyzing, or have been requested to review, a variety of environmental issues associated with
hydraulic fracturing. The EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental effects of
hydraulic fracturing on drinking water and groundwater, with initial results expected to be
available by late 2012 and final results by 2014. Moreover, the EPA recently announced on October
20, 2011 that it is also launching a study regarding wastewater resulting from hydraulic fracturing
activities and currently plans to propose standards by 2014 that such wastewater must meet before
being transported to a treatment plant. In addition, the U.S. Department of Energy is conducting
an investigation of practices the EPA could
37
recommend to better protect the environment from drilling using hydraulic fracturing completion methods. Also, the U.S. Department of the
Interior is considering disclosure requirements or other mandates for hydraulic fracturing on
federal lands. Additionally, certain members of Congress have called upon the U.S. Government
Accountability Office to investigate how hydraulic fracturing might adversely affect water
resources; the SEC to investigate the natural gas industry and any possible misleading of investors
or the public regarding the economic feasibility of pursuing natural gas deposits in shales by
means of hydraulic fracturing; and the U.S. Energy Information Administration to provide a better
understanding of that EPAs estimates regarding natural gas reserves, including reserves from shale
formations, as well as uncertainties associated with those estimates. These ongoing or proposed
studies, depending on their degree of pursuit and any meaningful results obtained, could spur
initiatives to further regulate hydraulic fracturing under the federal SDWA or other regulatory
mechanism.
Certain federal income tax deductions currently available with respect to oil and gas exploration
and development may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.
On September 12, 2011, President Obama sent to Congress a legislative package that includes
proposed legislation that, if enacted into law, would eliminate certain key U.S. federal income tax
incentives currently available to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies. These
changes include, among other proposals, (i) the repeal of the percentage depletion allowance for
oil and gas properties, (ii) the elimination of current deductions for intangible drilling and
development costs, (iii) the elimination of the deduction for United States production activities,
and (iv) the extension of the amortization period for certain geological and geophysical
expenditures.
These proposals also were included in President Obamas Proposed Fiscal Year 2012 Budget. It
is unclear whether any such changes or similar changes will be enacted or, if enacted, how soon any
such changes could become effective. The passage of this legislation or any other similar changes
in U.S. federal income tax law could affect certain tax deductions that are currently available
with respect to oil and gas exploration and production. Any such changes could have an adverse
effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Unregistered sales of securities. There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during
the period covered by this report.
Issuer purchases of equity securities. The following table contains information about our
acquisition of equity securities during the three months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Shares that May Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Exchanged (1) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
Under the Plans or Programs |
|
Jul 1 Jul 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 Aug 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 1 Sept 30, 2011 |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
26.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
127 |
|
|
$ |
26.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represent shares that employees surrendered back to the Company that equaled in value
the amount of taxes needed for payroll tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of
restricted stock awards. |
38
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 19, 2011 among the
Company, the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-4 on September 23, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 6, 2011, among Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, as borrower,
Oasis Petroleum LLC, Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC, Oasis Well Services
LLC and Oasis Petroleum Inc., as guarantors, BNP Paribas, as
administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 001-34776)
filed on October 7, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated October 27, 2011, by and among Oasis
Petroleum Inc., the subsidiary guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, as representative of the underwriters named therein
(filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (file
no. 001-34776) filed on October 28, 2011, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS (a)
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH (a)
|
|
XBRL Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL (a)
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF (a)
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB (a)
|
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE (a)
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
|
|
Date: November 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas B. Nusz
|
|
|
|
Thomas B. Nusz |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael H. Lou
|
|
|
|
Michael H. Lou |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Roy W. Mace
|
|
|
|
Roy W. Mace |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 19, 2011 among the
Company, the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-4 on September 23, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 6, 2011, among Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, as borrower,
Oasis Petroleum LLC, Oasis Petroleum Marketing LLC, Oasis Well Services
LLC and Oasis Petroleum Inc., as guarantors, BNP Paribas, as
administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 001-34776)
filed on October 7, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated October 27, 2011, by and among Oasis
Petroleum Inc., the subsidiary guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, as representative of the underwriters named therein
(filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (file
no. 001-34776) filed on October 28, 2011, and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS (a)
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH (a)
|
|
XBRL Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL (a)
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF (a)
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB (a)
|
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE (a)
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |
41