e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-51357
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
52-2084569 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1600
|
|
75201 |
Dallas, Texas
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(214) 880-3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o *Registrant is not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T at this time
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The
number of shares of the issuers common stock, par value $0.01,
outstanding as of April 28, 2009 was 36,055,720.
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
Index to Form 10-Q
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
163,799 |
|
|
$ |
259,873 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
129,626 |
|
|
|
201,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
34,173 |
|
|
|
58,016 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
54,398 |
|
|
|
76,212 |
|
Facility closure costs |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(20,785 |
) |
|
|
(18,291 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
6,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(28,326 |
) |
|
|
(24,761 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
(9,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(30,440 |
) |
|
|
(15,273 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefit of $0 in 2009 and $306 in 2008) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(30,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.85 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.85 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
35,802 |
|
|
|
35,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
102,550 |
|
|
$ |
106,891 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $6,749 and $6,194 at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
75,463 |
|
|
|
84,984 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
36,773 |
|
|
|
41,516 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
63,835 |
|
|
|
68,868 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,105 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
284,726 |
|
|
|
310,617 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
77,213 |
|
|
|
80,374 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
111,193 |
|
|
|
111,193 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
16,716 |
|
|
|
18,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
489,848 |
|
|
$ |
521,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
43,234 |
|
|
$ |
35,414 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
28,313 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
71,592 |
|
|
|
73,252 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
319,171 |
|
|
|
319,182 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
25,960 |
|
|
|
26,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
416,723 |
|
|
|
418,666 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized; 36,066 and 36,128 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
147,960 |
|
|
|
146,650 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(67,697 |
) |
|
|
(37,119 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,497 |
) |
|
|
(7,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
73,125 |
|
|
|
102,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
489,848 |
|
|
$ |
521,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(30,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,846 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
5,853 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
Net non-cash (income) expense from discontinued operations |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
Net gain on sales of assets |
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
(395 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
13,088 |
|
|
|
(3,695 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
(681 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
5,461 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(9,481 |
) |
|
|
(11,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(3,235 |
) |
|
|
(16,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Deferred loan costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(15,749 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
106,891 |
|
|
|
97,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
102,550 |
|
|
$ |
81,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Builders FirstSource, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed in 1998, is a leading supplier and
manufacturer of structural and related building products for residential new construction in the
United States. In this quarterly report, references to the company, we, our, ours or us
refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or
the context otherwise requires.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements include all recurring adjustments and normal accruals necessary for a fair statement of
the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the dates and periods
presented. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
during the remainder of the current year or for any future period. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 is derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2008 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein should be read in conjunction with the more detailed audited consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 included in our most recent annual report on Form
10-K. Accounting policies used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K.
2. Net Loss per Common Share
Net loss per common share (EPS) is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share, which requires the presentation of basic
and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of potential common shares.
The table below presents a reconciliation of weighted average common shares used in the
calculation of basic and diluted EPS (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average shares for basic EPS |
|
|
35,802 |
|
|
|
35,460 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock awards and options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for diluted EPS |
|
|
35,802 |
|
|
|
35,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our restricted stock shares include rights to receive dividends that are not subject to the
risk of forfeiture even if the underlying restricted stock shares on which the dividends were paid
do not vest. In accordance with FASB Staff Position EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, unvested share-based
payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are deemed participating securities
under SFAS No. 128 and should be considered in the calculation of basic EPS. Since the restricted
stock shares do not include an obligation to share in losses, they will be included in our basic
EPS calculation in periods of net income and excluded from our basic EPS calculation in periods of
net loss. Accordingly, there were 171,000 and 394,000 restricted stock shares excluded from the
computations of basic EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because we generated a net loss. For the
purpose of computing diluted EPS, options to purchase 2.8 million and 3.0 million shares of common
stock were not included in the computations of diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, because their effect was anti-dilutive.
6
3. Receivables
Trade accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
$ |
82,212 |
|
|
$ |
91,178 |
|
Less: allowance for returns and doubtful accounts |
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
75,463 |
|
|
$ |
84,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income tax receivables |
|
$ |
33,197 |
|
|
$ |
35,268 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables |
|
$ |
36,773 |
|
|
$ |
41,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
Floating rate notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,216 |
|
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,216 |
|
|
|
319,226 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
$ |
319,171 |
|
|
$ |
319,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the current quarter, we reduced the borrowing capacity under our 2007 Senior Secured
Credit Agreement (the 2007 Agreement) from $350 million to $250 million. We do not anticipate
that our borrowing base will support borrowings in excess of $250 million at any point during the
remaining life of this credit facility. This reduction will allow us to reduce our interest expense
related to commitment fees. We expensed approximately $1.2 million of deferred financing costs
related to this reduction during the current quarter.
Loans under the 2007 Agreement are collateralized by substantially all of our assets,
primarily accounts receivable and inventory, and are guaranteed by us and certain of our
subsidiaries. Our net borrowing availability in excess of the $35 million liquidity covenant at
March 31, 2009 was zero due to a drop in our eligible borrowing base. The 2007 Agreement has
certain restrictive covenants, which, among other things, relate to the payment of dividends,
incurrence of indebtedness, and asset sales. The 2007 Agreement also has a fixed charge coverage
ratio of 1:1 that is triggered if our available borrowing capacity, as determined under the
borrowing base formula, is less than $35 million. The calculation allows cash on deposit with the
agent to be included as eligible borrowing base. Approximately $19.1 million of cash on hand at
March 31, 2009 supported a short-fall in the calculation of the $35 million minimum liquidity
covenant. Absent the use of cash in the calculation, we would have been forced to repay $19.1
million in borrowings to comply with the covenant. Based on our 2009 forecast, we will not meet the
fixed charge coverage ratio, but we anticipate that we will not fall below the $35 million minimum
liquidity covenant in 2009 including the use of cash on deposit with the agent; therefore, we will
not trigger the fixed charge coverage ratio requirement. The fixed charge coverage ratio is defined
as the ratio of earnings before interest expenses, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
expenses minus capital expenditures, cash taxes paid, dividends, distributions and share
repurchases or redemptions to the sum of scheduled principal payments and interest expense on a
trailing twelve month basis from the trigger date.
In the first quarter of 2008, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements with
notional amounts of $100.0 million, $50.0 million, and $50.0 million, respectively. The swap
agreements are three year swaps that fix $200.0 million of our outstanding floating rate notes at a
weighted average interest rate of 7.41%, including an applicable margin. We are paying a fixed rate
at 3.25%, 3.17% and 2.99%, respectively, on the swaps and receive a variable rate at 90 day LIBOR.
The swaps commenced May 15, 2008.
7
We utilize interest rate swaps in order to mitigate a portion of the interest rate risk that
we are exposed to in the normal course of business on our floating rate notes. Our three swaps are
designated and qualify as fully effective cash flow hedges. All changes in fair value are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and subsequently reclassified into
earnings when the related interest expense on the underlying borrowing is recognized. Based on
interest rates in effect on the interest rate swaps at the end of the quarter, we expect to
reclassify approximately $3.9 million of losses into interest expense within the next twelve
months. The table below presents the effect of our interest rate swap derivatives on the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
Designated as |
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from OCI |
Hedging |
|
Recognized in OCI* |
|
Location of Loss Reclassified |
|
Into Income* |
Instruments |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
from OCI into Income |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(808 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,005 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
(725 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
When our interest rate swap agreements are in a net asset position, we are exposed to credit
losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties. The amount of such credit exposure is
limited to the unrealized gains on our swaps. We have not experienced any credit loss as a result
of counterparty nonperformance in the past. To manage credit risks, we generally select
counterparties who are part of our banking syndicate and settle on a net basis. We perform a
quarterly assessment of our counterparty credit risk, including a review of credit ratings, credit
default swap rates, and potential nonperformance of the counterparty. Since the counterparty is
part of the bank syndicate, we also would have the ability to net amounts owed to us against any
outstanding borrowings under the 2007 Agreement, thereby reducing the credit risk.
When interest rate swap agreements are in a net liability position, we are required to
establish a reserve against our borrowing base equal to 110% of the fair value of the interest rate
swaps on the last day of the month. This reserve effectively reduces our available borrowing
capacity under the 2007 Agreement. At March 31, 2009, the reserve for the swaps is $8.8 million.
The swaps are also collateralized in a manner similar to the loans under the 2007 Agreement. In the
event of default, or if we or the counterparty fail to be part of the 2007 Agreement, an early
termination event would be triggered which could require us to settle the swaps on the termination
date at the then fair market value.
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) establishes a three-tiered fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations of
financial assets and liabilities and increases disclosures surrounding these calculations. The
three levels of inputs are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by us |
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those inputs classified as Level 1 |
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation |
SFAS No. 157 requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the
hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value calculation.
The only financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are our interest
rate swaps. The interest rate swaps are valued in the market using discounted cash flow
techniques. These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. These market inputs are
utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the term, notional amount, discount
rate, yield curve and credit
risk of the financial instrument. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest
rate swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
8
The following table presents information about the Companys financial instruments measured at
fair value on a recurring basis using significant other observable inputs (Level 2) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
Measurement as of |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
Measurement as of |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Interest rate swaps (included in Other long-term liabilities) |
|
$ |
7,957 |
|
|
$ |
7,957 |
|
|
$ |
7,667 |
|
|
$ |
7,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have elected to continue to report the value of our floating rate notes at amortized cost.
The floating rate notes are registered and publicly traded. The fair value of the floating rate
notes at March 31, 2009 based on recent trading was approximately $55.0 million. The carrying value
of amounts outstanding under the 2007 Agreement approximates fair value.
5. Comprehensive Loss
The following table presents the components of comprehensive loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(30,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,846 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss change in fair value
of interest rate swap agreements, net of related
tax effect |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(2,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(30,661 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Employee Stock-based Compensation
Our board of directors granted 430,634 stock options and 28,850 shares of restricted stock to
employees on February 26, 2008. The grants were made primarily under our 2007 Incentive Plan with
6,850 shares of restricted stock under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and all vest ratably over
three years. The grant date fair value for the restricted stock and the exercise price for the
options was $6.70 per share, which was the closing stock price on that date. The grant date fair
value of the options was $2.75 and was determined using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life |
|
5 years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
42.28 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
7. Facility Closure Costs
During the first quarter of 2009, we developed a plan to close a distribution facility in
Maryland and an administrative facility in South Carolina. The exit plan is expected to be
completed in the second quarter of 2009. During the first quarter of 2009, we recognized $0.6
million in facility closure costs which are primarily related to future minimum lease obligations
on these vacated facilities, net of estimated sub-rental lease income. Facility closure reserves
were approximately $5.6 million at March 31, 2009, of which $4.1 million was classified as other
long-term liabilities.
8. Income Taxes
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (SFAS No. 109), we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation
allowance is required. SFAS No. 109 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances
should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded additional valuation allowance of $12.9 million against the
net deferred tax assets generated from the net loss during the period related to our continuing
operations. We did not record a similar valuation allowance in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
9
To the extent we generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize the tax
benefits of the net deferred tax assets on which a valuation allowance is recorded, our effective
tax rate may decrease as the valuation allowance is reversed. However, to the extent we generate
future operating losses, we would be required to increase the valuation allowance on our net
deferred tax assets and our income tax expense will be adversely affected.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
We are a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although the
ultimate disposition of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes
the outcome of any claim that is pending or threatened, either individually or on a combined basis,
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations. However, there can be no assurances that future costs would not be material
to our results of operations or liquidity for a particular period.
10. Segment and Product Information
We have three regional operating segments Atlantic, Southeast and Central with
centralized financial and operational oversight. We believe that these operating segments meet the
aggregation criteria prescribed in SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, and thus have one reportable segment.
Sales by product category for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
29,829 |
|
|
$ |
51,532 |
|
Windows & doors |
|
|
40,662 |
|
|
|
66,879 |
|
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
39,979 |
|
|
|
61,219 |
|
Millwork |
|
|
17,178 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
Other building products & services |
|
|
36,151 |
|
|
|
52,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
163,799 |
|
|
$ |
259,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, as required for our financial
assets and financial liabilities. However, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS 157 for one
year as it relates to fair value measurement requirements for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis.
We adopted these remaining provisions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 157 did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R addresses the recognition and accounting for identifiable assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in business combinations. SFAS 141R also
establishes expanded disclosure requirements for business combinations. SFAS 141R was effective for
us on January 1, 2009, and we will apply SFAS 141R prospectively to all business combinations
subsequent to the effective date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires
entities that use derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives
and strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. SFAS 161 also requires entities to disclose additional
information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements, how the provisions of
SFAS 133 have been applied, and the impact that hedges have on an entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 161 effective
January 1, 2009. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the Companys
disclosures about its derivative instruments and hedging activities.
10
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-06-1).
According to FSP EITF 03-06-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under SFAS No.
128. As such, they should be included in the computation of basic earnings per share (EPS) using
the two-class method. This pronouncement, which we adopted January 1, 2009, requires retrospective
application. The application of FSP EITF 03-06-1 did not have a material impact on the computation
of our EPS as discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This staff position requires disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments whenever a public company issues financial information for interim
reporting periods. This staff position is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June
15, 2009. We will comply with these disclosure requirements subsequent to this date.
11
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December
31, 2008 included in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. The following discussion and
analysis should also be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements appearing elsewhere in this report. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to
the company, we, our, ours or us refer to Builders FirstSource, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires.
Cautionary Statement
Statements in this report which are not purely historical facts or which necessarily depend
upon future events, including statements regarding our anticipations, beliefs, expectations, hopes,
intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements in
this report are based upon information available to us on the date of this report. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Any forward-looking statements made in this report involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the
events or results described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In addition, oral statements made by our
directors, officers and employees to the investor and analyst communities, media representatives
and others, depending upon their nature, may also constitute forward-looking statements. As with
the forward-looking statements included in this report, these forward-looking statements are by
nature inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors.
Further information regarding the risk factors that could affect our financial and other results
are included as Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We are a leading supplier and manufacturer of structural and related building products for
residential new construction in the U.S. We offer an integrated solution to our customers providing
manufacturing, supply and installation of a full range of structural and related building products.
Our manufactured products include our factory-built roof and floor trusses, wall panels and stairs,
aluminum and vinyl windows, custom millwork and trim, as well as engineered wood that we design and
cut for each home. We also assemble interior and exterior doors into pre-hung units. Additionally,
we supply our customers with a broad offering of professional grade building products not
manufactured by us, such as dimensional lumber and lumber sheet goods, various window, door and
millwork lines, as well as cabinets, roofing and gypsum wallboard. Our full range of
construction-related services includes professional installation, turn-key framing and shell
construction, and spans all our product categories.
We group our building products into five product categories:
|
|
|
Prefabricated Components. Our prefabricated components consist of wood floor and roof
trusses, steel roof trusses, wall panels, stairs, and engineered wood. |
|
|
|
|
Windows & Doors. Our windows & doors category is comprised of the manufacturing,
assembly, and distribution of windows and interior and exterior door units. |
|
|
|
|
Lumber & Lumber Sheet Goods. Lumber & lumber sheet goods include dimensional lumber,
plywood, and OSB products used in on-site house framing. |
|
|
|
|
Millwork. Millwork includes interior trim, exterior trim, columns and posts that we
distribute, as well as custom exterior features that we manufacture under the Synboard brand
name. |
|
|
|
|
Other building products & services. Other building products & services are comprised of
products such as cabinets, gypsum, roofing and insulation and services such as turn-key
framing, shell construction, design assistance, and professional installation spanning all
of our product categories. |
12
Our operating results are dependent on the following trends, events and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control:
|
|
|
Homebuilding Industry. Our business is driven primarily by the residential new
construction market, which is in turn dependent upon a number of factors, including interest
rates, consumer confidence, foreclosure rates, and the health of the economy and mortgage
markets. Over the past few years, many homebuilders significantly decreased their starts
because of lower demand and an excess of home inventory. Due to the decline in housing
starts and increased competition for homebuilder business, we have and will continue to
experience increasing pressure on our margins. The decline in housing starts continues to be
widespread and we expect this trend to continue through 2009 and possibly beyond. However,
we still believe there are several meaningful trends that indicate U.S. housing demand will
likely remain healthy in the long term and that the current downturn in the housing industry
is likely a trough in the cyclical nature of the residential construction industry. These
trends include relatively low interest rates, the aging of housing stock, and normal
population growth due to birthrate exceeding death rate. |
|
|
|
|
Targeting Large Production Homebuilders. In recent years, the homebuilding industry has
undergone significant consolidation, with the larger homebuilders substantially increasing
their market share. We expect that trend to accelerate during this housing correction due to
the better liquidity positions of the larger homebuilders relative to the smaller, less
capitalized homebuilders. Our focus is on maintaining relationships and market share with
these customers while balancing the competitive pressures we are facing in our markets with
certain profitability expectations. Our sales to the Builder 100, the countrys largest
100 homebuilders, fell 47.0% during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the
same period of the prior year, slightly better than the overall decline in housing activity
in the United States. We expect that our ability to maintain strong relationships with the
largest builders will be vital to our ability to grow and expand into new markets as well as
maintain our current market share through the downturn. Additionally, during the downturn,
we will continue to expand our custom homebuilder base, but this growth may be limited by
our tight credit standards. |
|
|
|
|
Expand into Multi-Family and Light Commercial Business. We have, and will continue to,
diversify our customer base and grow our sales by further expanding into multi-family and
light commercial business. While we primarily serve the single family new home construction
market, we have entered the multi-family and/or light commercial market in certain regions.
Our Shelby, Alabama location gives us the ability to manufacture steel roof trusses often
used in multi-family and light commercial construction. |
|
|
|
|
Use of Prefabricated Components. Prior to the current housing downturn, homebuilders
were increasingly using prefabricated components in order to realize increased efficiency
and improved quality. Shortening cycle time from start to completion was a key imperative of
the homebuilders during periods of strong consumer demand. With the current housing
downturn, that trend has decelerated as cycle time has less relevance. Customers who
traditionally used prefabricated components, for the most part, still do. However, the
conversion of customers to this product offering has slowed. We expect this trend to
continue at least for the duration of this downturn. In response, we have reduced our
manufacturing capacity and delayed plans to open new facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Economic Conditions. Economic changes both nationally and locally in our markets impact
our financial performance. The building products supply industry is highly dependent upon
new home construction and subject to cyclical market changes. Our operations are subject to
fluctuations arising from changes in supply and demand, national economic conditions, labor
costs, competition, government regulation, trade policies and other factors that affect the
homebuilding industry such as demographic trends, interest rates, single-family housing
starts, employment levels, consumer confidence, and the availability of credit to
homebuilders, contractors, and homeowners. During 2007, the mortgage markets experienced
substantial disruption due to increased defaults, primarily as a result of credit quality
deterioration. The disruption has continued and precipitated evolving changes in the
regulatory environment and reduced availability of mortgages for potential homebuyers due to
an illiquid credit market and more restrictive standards to qualify for mortgages. During
2008, the conditions in the credit markets and the economy worsened and the economy fell
into a recession. The credit markets and financial services industry have recently
experienced a significant crisis characterized by the bankruptcy or failure of various
financial institutions and severe limitations on credit availability. As a result, the
credit markets have become highly illiquid as financial and lending institutions have
limited credit to conserve cash and protect their balance sheets. Although Congress and
applicable regulatory authorities have enacted legislation and implemented policies and
plans designed to free up the credit markets, it is unclear as to whether these actions have
been effective to date or will be effective in the future. As the housing industry is
dependent upon potential homebuyers access to mortgage financing and homebuilders access
to commercial credit, it is likely there will be further damage to an already weak housing
industry until conditions substantially improve. |
13
|
|
|
Cost of Materials. Prices of wood products, which are subject to cyclical market
fluctuations, may adversely impact operating income when prices rapidly rise or fall within
a relatively short period of time. We purchase certain materials, including lumber products,
which are then sold to customers as well as used as direct production inputs for our
manufactured and prefabricated products. Short-term changes in the cost of these materials,
some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes passed on to our
customers, but our pricing quotation periods may limit our ability to pass on such price
changes. We may also be limited in our ability to pass on increases on in-bound freight
costs on our products due to the price of fuel. Our inability to pass on material price
increases to our customers could adversely impact our operating income. |
|
|
|
|
Controlling Expenses. Another important aspect of our strategy is controlling costs and
enhancing our status as a low-cost building materials supplier in the markets we serve. We
pay close attention to managing our working capital and operating expenses. We have a best
practices operating philosophy, which encourages increasing efficiency, lowering costs,
improving working capital, and maximizing profitability and cash flow. We constantly analyze
our workforce productivity to achieve the optimum, cost-efficient labor mix for our
facilities. Further, we pay careful attention to our logistics function and its effect on
our shipping and handling costs. |
CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK
The housing industry experienced further declines in the first quarter of 2009. The
annualized rate for single-family housings starts at March 31, 2009 was 358,000, down almost 50%
from 711,000 one year ago. For the quarter, actual single-family housing starts were 78,200, down
from 161,900 last year, a 52% decline. We felt the impact of these difficult conditions on our
first quarter results although we were able to limit the impact through execution of our strategy.
Our strategy principally consisted of growing market share, implementing cost containment programs
which included reducing physical capacity and adjusting staffing levels, prudently managing credit
and, most importantly, conserving cash. Overall, we feel these efforts were successful. We estimate
that market share gains contributed 17% sales growth during the quarter, partially offsetting the
impact of declining housing starts on our sales. We lowered our average full-time equivalent
headcount by over 1,900 from the first quarter of 2008, a decrease of 38%. The reductions in
payroll costs coupled with other cost reductions allowed us to reduce our selling, general and
administrative expenses by 29% compared to the first quarter of 2008. Because of these measures
and others, our net cash used during the quarter was only $4.3 million. We believe these efforts
will not only benefit us in the short-term but will allow us to be a more efficient organization in
the long-term.
We expect these difficult conditions to continue throughout 2009. We believe our strategy
remains relevant in these conditions and allows us to focus on conserving cash while maintaining a
viable operating platform. We have aggressively but prudently cut costs during this downturn, and
these efforts will continue in 2009. In addition, we believe we can continue to offset declining
sales through market share gains by expanding our presence in the light commercial and multi-family
segments, as well as increasing penetration with our top customers. Finally, we will continue to
focus on working capital, to diligently control credit to our customers and also work with our
vendors to improve our payment terms and pricing on our products. We ended the
quarter with over $102 million in cash, of which $83.5 million was available for operations. In
addition, we received $31.8 million in federal income tax refunds subsequent to quarter-end, and
are expecting an additional $1.0 to 1.5 million in state income tax refunds to be received later in
2009. The continued execution of our strategy coupled with our available cash and income tax
refunds should provide adequate liquidity to weather this unprecedented downturn into 2010.
We still believe that the long-term outlook for the housing industry is positive due to growth
in the underlying demographics. At this point, it is unclear if housing activity has hit bottom,
but we believe our market leadership, financial strength and industry-leading scale afford us the
ability to manage through the downturn. We will continue to work diligently to achieve the
appropriate balance of short-term cost reductions while maintaining the expertise to grow the
business when market conditions improve
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
None
14
SEASONALITY AND OTHER FACTORS
Our first and fourth quarters have historically been, and are expected to continue to be,
adversely affected by weather patterns in some of our markets, causing reduced construction
activity. In addition, quarterly results historically have reflected, and are expected to continue
to reflect, fluctuations from period to period arising from the following:
|
|
|
The volatility of lumber prices; |
|
|
|
|
The cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry; |
|
|
|
|
General economic conditions in the markets in which we compete; |
|
|
|
|
The pricing policies of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
The production schedules of our customers; and |
|
|
|
|
The effects of weather. |
The composition and level of working capital typically change during periods of increasing
sales as we carry more inventory and receivables. Working capital levels typically increase in the
second and third quarters of the year due to higher sales during the peak residential construction
season. These increases have in the past resulted in negative operating cash flows during this peak
season, which generally have been financed through available cash. Collection of receivables and
reduction in inventory levels following the peak building and construction season have more than
offset this negative cash flow. We have also from time to time utilized our credit facility to
cover working capital needs if needed.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the
percentage relationship to sales of certain costs, expenses and income items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
79.1 |
% |
|
|
77.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
Facility closure costs |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(12.6 |
)% |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(18.7 |
)% |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared with the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Sales. Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $163.8 million, a 37.0% decrease
from sales of $259.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. In the three months ended
March 31, 2009, housing starts in our markets decreased approximately 50%, while market prices for
lumber and lumber sheet goods were on average 15.2% lower than the same period a year ago. We were
able to mitigate some of this decline by continuing to expand into the multi-family and light
commercial segment. Additionally, we were able to largely hold our market share with our Builder
100 customers and increase share with regional builders, and to lesser degree, with smaller custom
builders. These items contributed to an approximate 17% market share growth during the current
quarter. We were limited in growing our market share with custom builders due to our tight credit
standards. Although these tight credit standards reduce our growth potential, they also limit our
exposure to large write-offs in future quarters.
15
The following table shows sales classified by product category (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
% Change |
|
Prefabricated components |
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
$ |
51.5 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
(42.1 |
)% |
Windows & doors |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
(39.2 |
)% |
Lumber & lumber sheet goods |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
(34.7 |
)% |
Millwork |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
(38.5 |
)% |
Other building products & services |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
(30.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
163.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
259.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(37.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All our product categories have been negatively impacted by volume declines associated with
decreased housing activity. For the lumber & lumber sheet goods category, decreased volume
accounted for 92% of our sales decline while lower prices accounted for 8% of the decline. This
equates to $19.5 million and $1.7 million in sales declines due to volume and price, respectively,
for this product category.
Our sales saw a shift away from prefabricated components towards other building products and
services. As housing starts have declined cycle time has become less relevant, causing some
builders to opt for our framing and installation services over prefabricated components. Our
installation business has also grown due to our expansion into the multi-family and light
commercial segments. We believe our installation business and our value-added products and services
give us a competitive advantage helping us to attract new business during this down cycle.
Gross Margin. Gross margin decreased $23.8 million to $34.2 million. Our gross margin
percentage decreased from 22.3% in the first quarter of 2008 to 20.9% in the current quarter, a
1.4 percentage point decline. Our gross margin percentage decreased by 0.3 percentage points due to
price, 0.6 percentage points due to volume (a result of fixed costs within cost of goods sold) and
0.5 percentage points due to a shift in sales mix toward installed product sales, which carry a
lower gross margin percentage. We experienced margin compression across all product categories due
to competition and lower sales volumes against fixed costs in our manufacturing facilities. While
we have seen some margin stabilization in recent months, if economic conditions continue to
deteriorate, we could see further margin compression.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased $21.8 million, or 28.6%. Average full-time equivalent employee headcount for the quarter
was 37.7% lower than the year ago quarter, and our salaries and benefits expense, excluding stock
compensation, decreased $13.6 million, or 31.3%, compared to a 37.0% decline in sales. We will
continue to consider in-market consolidations and facility closures based on specific market
conditions. Additionally, our office general and administrative expense decreased $3.1 million,
which included decreases in professional services fees and travel related costs, and our delivery
expenses decreased $4.1 million due to lower fuel costs combined with our efforts to eliminate
excess fleet. As an offset to these declines, our bad debt expense increased $0.9 million as our
customers continue to struggle with the decline in housing starts and limited availability of
credit. We have responded to the increase in bad debt expense by continuing to tighten our credit
standards, lowering credit limits, and in some cases requiring collateral.
As a percent of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 29.3% in
2008 to 33.2% in 2009. Salaries and benefit expense as a percentage of sales increased 1.5%,
occupancy by 0.9% due to the fixed nature of the category, delivery costs by 0.7% due to fixed
lease costs, and bad debt expense by 0.6%. We continue to monitor our operating cost structure
closely and make adjustments as necessary.
Interest Expense, net. Interest expense was $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2009, an
increase of $1.1 million. The increase was primarily due to the write-off of $1.2 million of
unamortized debt issuance costs in the current quarter related to the capacity reduction of our
credit facility from $350 million to $250 million.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We recognized income tax expense of $2.1 million, or a 7.5%
effective tax rate, compared to an income tax benefit of $9.5 million, or a 38.3% tax benefit rate,
for the same period a year ago. The income tax rate in the current quarter was affected by a
non-cash valuation allowance of $12.9 million against the net deferred tax assets generated from
the net loss during the period related to our continuing operations. Excluding the effect of the
valuation allowance, the effective tax rate was 38.1%.
16
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash on hand was $102.6 million at March 31, 2009. Due to the decline in sales and the
corresponding reduction in our trade receivables and inventory which support our borrowing base,
our net borrowing availability in excess of the $35 million liquidity covenant contained in our
credit agreement was zero at March 31, 2009. Approximately $19.1 million of cash on hand at
quarter-end supported a short-fall in the calculation of the $35 million minimum liquidity
covenant. This covenant, which calculates as eligible borrowing base minus outstanding borrowings,
must exceed $35 million or we are required to meet a fixed charge coverage ratio, which we
currently would not meet. However, the calculation also allows cash on deposit with the agent to be
included as eligible borrowing base. Absent the use of cash in the calculation, we would have been
forced to repay $19.1 million in borrowings in order to comply with the covenant. Accordingly, our
available cash was $83.5 million at March 31, 2009.
Since the beginning of the housing downturn, a primary focus has been on protecting our
liquidity. We have implemented an action plan consisting of growing market share, reducing physical
capacity, adjusting staffing levels, implementing cost containment programs, managing credit
tightly, and most importantly, conserving cash. Although we felt the impact of the difficult
conditions, we were able to limit it through this action plan. Overall, we believe our efforts were
successful and we will continue to execute this strategy in 2009. With this continued strategy
execution, $83.5 million in available cash at quarter-end, $31.8 million in federal income tax
refunds received subsequent to quarter-end, and an additional $1.0 $1.5 million in state income
tax refunds expected to be received later in 2009, we believe we will have sufficient capital to
meet our anticipated short-term needs, including capital expenditures and debt obligations for the
next twelve months. Key assumptions considered in making this assessment are single-family housing
starts ranging from 350,000 to 500,000, market share gains consistent with that achieved in 2008,
market prices for commodity products stable with 2008, stable to only slight declines in product
gross margins, continued ability to lower operating costs principally in salaries and benefits
expense, timely receipt of our expected state income tax refunds, and consistent advance rates
under our credit facility year-over-year. Should housing conditions deteriorate greater than
expected, advance rates under our credit agreement be significantly reduced, or other assumptions
prove to be incorrect, our action plans will expand to include further facility closures, attempts
to renegotiate leases, increased headcount reductions and the potential divestitures of non-core
business.
Our focus on liquidity extends beyond just 2009. Although an improvement in housing activity
is generally expected toward the end of 2009, we have set an action plan for 2009 designed to
provide us with sufficient liquidity to extend into 2010 even with no appreciable improvement in
housing activity. However, there are no assurances that these steps will prove successful if the
housing downturn is steeper or more protracted than general expectations. Should the current
economic conditions continue beyond what we have planned in our 2009 action plan or deteriorate
further, subsequent to 2009 we may be required to raise external funds through the sale of common
stock or debt in the public capital markets or in privately negotiated transactions. There can be
no assurance that any such financing would be available on favorable terms, if at all. In assessing
our liquidity, key components include our net loss, current assets and current liabilities. For
assessing our long-term liquidity, we also consider our debt and long-term liabilities.
For more information regarding our liquidity and capital resources see our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no other material changes in our
liquidity, commitments for capital expenditures or sources and mix of capital resources.
Consolidated Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities was $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to cash used in operating activities of $16.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008. This decrease in cash used was primarily driven by reductions in working capital, primarily
trade accounts receivable and inventory, which was partially offset by reduced profitability due to
declining sales.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, cash used in investing activities was
$1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Capital expenditures increased $0.4 million and were
partially offset by an increase in proceeds from sale of assets as the company continued its
efforts to reduce fleet costs by buying out existing equipment leases and selling off excess
equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, cash used in financing activities was $0.1 compared
to cash provided by financing activities of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in cash received from stock option exercises.
17
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, as required for our financial
assets and financial liabilities. However, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS 157 for one
year as it relates to fair value measurement requirements for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis.
We adopted these remaining provisions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 157 did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R addresses the recognition and accounting for identifiable assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in business combinations. SFAS 141R also
establishes expanded disclosure requirements for business combinations. SFAS 141R was effective for
us on January 1, 2009, and we will apply SFAS 141R prospectively to all business combinations
subsequent to the effective date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires
entities that use derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives
and strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. SFAS 161 also requires entities to disclose additional
information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements,
how the provisions of SFAS 133 have been applied, and the impact that hedges have on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS 161 effective January 1, 2009. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for the Companys disclosures about its derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-06-1).
According to FSP EITF 03-06-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under
SFAS No. 128. As such, they should be included in the computation of basic earnings per share
(EPS) using the two-class method. This pronouncement, which we adopted January 1, 2009, requires
retrospective application. The application of FSP EITF 03-06-1 did not have a material impact on
the computation of our EPS as discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This staff position requires disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments whenever a public company issues financial information for interim
reporting periods. This staff position is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June
15, 2009. We will comply with these disclosure requirements subsequent to this date.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. Changes in our
debt could also increase these risks. We utilize interest rate swap contracts to fix interest rates
on a portion of our outstanding long-term debt balances. Based on debt outstanding on March 31,
2009 and interest rate swap contracts in place at March 31, 2009, a 1.0% increase in interest rates
would result in approximately $1.2 million of additional interest expense annually. As discussed
in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, our interest rate swap contracts are
currently in a net liability position. Under the terms of our 2007 credit agreement, when these
swap contracts are in a net liability position we are required to establish a reserve against our
borrowing base equal to 110% of the fair value of the contracts as of the last day of each month.
At March 31, 2009, this reserve was $8.8 million.
We purchase certain materials, including lumber products, which are then sold to customers as
well as used as direct production inputs for our manufactured products that we deliver. Short-term
changes in the cost of these materials, some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are
sometimes, but not always, passed on to our customers. Our delayed ability to pass on material
price increases to our customers can adversely impact our operating income.
18
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications. Our management, with the
participation of our principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO),
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The controls
evaluation was conducted by our Disclosure Committee, comprised of senior representatives from our
finance, accounting, internal audit, and legal departments under the supervision of our CEO and
CFO.
Certifications of our CEO and our CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), are attached as exhibits to this
quarterly report. This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with
the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A system of controls and procedures, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the system are met. Because of the limitations in all such systems, no evaluation
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. Furthermore, the design of any system of controls and procedures is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions, regardless of how unlikely. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective
system of controls and procedures, misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and
not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
included a review of their objectives and design, the Companys implementation of the controls and
procedures and the effect of the controls and procedures on the information generated for use in
this quarterly report. In the course of the evaluation, we sought to identify whether we had any
data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action,
including process improvements, were being undertaken if needed. This type of evaluation is
performed on a quarterly basis so that conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures can be reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Many of the
components of our disclosure controls and procedures are also evaluated by our internal audit
department, our legal department and by personnel in our finance organization. The overall goals of
these various evaluation activities are to monitor our disclosure controls and procedures on an
ongoing basis, and to maintain them as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
Conclusions regarding Disclosure Controls. Based on the required evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of March 31, 2009, we maintain
disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this
report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in
the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured
retention as we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any
or all of our liabilities in respect of claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental
regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations. We believe
that our facilities are in material compliance with such laws and regulations. As owners and
lessees of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of
contamination on such properties, in some circumstances without regard to whether we knew of or
were responsible for such contamination. Our current expenditures
19
with respect to environmental investigation and remediation at our facilities are minimal,
although no assurance can be provided that more significant remediation may not be required in the
future as a result of spills or releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances or the
discovery of unknown environmental conditions.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
(a) None
Use of Proceeds
(b) Not applicable
Company Stock Repurchases
(c) The following table provides information with respect to our purchases of Builders
FirstSource, Inc. common stock during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
January 1, 2009 January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2009 February 28, 2009 |
|
|
61,814 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2009 March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
61,814 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares presented in the above table represent restricted stock tendered in order to meet
minimum withholding tax requirements for shares vested.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
(a) None
(b) None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
(a) None
(b) None
20
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys current report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2005, among JLL
Building Products, LLC, Builders FirstSource, Inc., Floyd F. Sherman, Charles L. Horn,
Kevin P. OMeara, and Donald F. McAleenan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., the Guarantors named therein, and UBS Securities LLC and Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 27, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Subsidiary Guarantors thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys registration statement
on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2005, File
Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as chief executive
officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Charles L. Horn as chief financial officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as chief executive
officer and Charles L. Horn as chief financial officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statements pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our chief executive officer, and Charles L. Horn, our chief financial
officer. |
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ FLOYD F. SHERMAN
|
|
|
Floyd F. Sherman |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
April 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CHARLES L. HORN
|
|
|
Charles L. Horn |
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
April 29, 2009
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 6, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Builders FirstSource, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys current report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2007, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2005, among JLL
Building Products, LLC, Builders FirstSource, Inc., Floyd F. Sherman, Charles L. Horn,
Kevin P. OMeara, and Donald F. McAleenan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 4, 2005, File Number 0-51357) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders
FirstSource, Inc., the Guarantors named therein, and UBS Securities LLC and Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 27, 2005, File Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2005, among Builders FirstSource, Inc., the
Subsidiary Guarantors thereto, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys registration statement
on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2005, File
Number 333-122788) |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as chief executive
officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Charles L. Horn as chief financial officer |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Written statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Floyd F. Sherman as chief executive
officer and Charles L. Horn as chief financial officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is furnishing, but not filing, the written
statements pursuant to Title 18 United States Code 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Floyd F. Sherman,
our chief executive officer, and Charles L. Horn, our chief financial
officer. |
23