e20vf
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR
(g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
o
|
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
Date of event requiring this
shell company report
|
Commission file
number: 1-14251
SAP AG
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
SAP CORPORATION
(Translation of
Registrants name into English)
Federal Republic of Germany
(Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16
69190 Walldorf
Federal Republic of Germany
(Address of principal
executive offices)
Wendy Boufford
c/o SAP Labs
3410 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, United States of
America
650-849-4000 (Tel)
604-974-4789 (Fax)
(Name, Telephone,
Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact
Person)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
American Depositary Receipts, each representing
one Ordinary Share, without nominal value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Ordinary Shares, without nominal value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Act: None
Securities for which there is a
reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers
classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report:
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares, without nominal value (as of December 31,
2008)**
|
|
1,225,762,900
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If
this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Note
Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required
to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under
those Sections.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used
to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP þ International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards
Board o Other o
If
other has been checked in response to the previous
question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item
the registrant has elected to follow.
If
this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
* Not for trading, but
only in connection with the registration of American Depositary
Shares representing such ordinary shares.
** Including 38,456,734
treasury shares.
[THIS
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
i
INTRODUCTION
SAP AG is a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft)
and is referred to in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
together with its subsidiaries, as SAP, or as the
Company, we, our, or
us. Our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 18. Financial Statements in this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America, referred
to as U.S. GAAP.
In this Annual Report on
Form 20-F:
(i) references to US$, $, or
dollars are to U.S. dollars;
(ii) references to or euro
are to the euro. Our financial statements are denominated in
euros, which is the currency of our home country, Germany.
Certain amounts that appear in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
may not add up because of rounding adjustments.
Unless otherwise specified herein, euro financial data have been
converted into dollars at the noon buying rate in New York City
for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for
customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the
Noon Buying Rate) on December 31, 2008, which
was US$1.3919 per 1.00. No representation is made that
such euro amounts actually represent such dollar amounts or that
such euro amounts could have been or could be converted into
dollars at that or any other exchange rate on such date or on
any other dates. The rate used for the convenience translations
also differs from the currency exchange rates used for the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. For
information regarding recent rates of exchange between euro and
dollars, see Item 3. Key Information
Exchange Rates. On March 9, 2009, the Noon Buying
Rate for converting euro to dollars was US$1.2565 per 1.00.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
to ordinary shares are to SAP AGs ordinary shares, without
nominal value. References in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
to ADRs are to SAP AGs American Depositary
Receipts, each representing one SAP ordinary share.
SAP, R/3, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, PartnerEdge, ByDesign, SAP
Business ByDesign, and other SAP products and services mentioned
herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or
registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and other
countries. Business Objects and the Business Objects logo,
BusinessObjects, Crystal Reports, Crystal Decisions, Web
Intelligence, Xcelsius, and other Business Objects products and
services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are
trademarks or registered trademarks of Business
Objects S.A. in the United States and in other countries.
Business Objects is an SAP company. All other product and
service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective
companies. Data contained in this document serves informational
purposes only. National product specifications may vary.
Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
whenever a reference is made to our website, such reference does
not incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the
information contained on our website.
1
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
This Annual Report on
Form 20-F
contains forward-looking statements and information based on the
beliefs of, and assumptions made by, our management using
information currently available to them. Any statements
contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as
defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. We have based these forward-looking statements on
our current expectations, assumptions and projections about
future events. As a result, our forward-looking statements and
information are subject to uncertainties and risks. A broad
range of uncertainties and risks, many of which are beyond our
control, could cause our actual results and performance to
differ materially from any projections expressed in or implied
by our forward looking statements. These uncertainties and risks
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
economic conditions in general and trends in our business,
particularly the current global economic crisis and general
global economic uncertainty and any further deterioration of
current conditions;
|
|
|
|
claims and lawsuits against us that could result in adverse
outcomes, including third party infringement claims;
|
|
|
|
our ability to use intellectual property, including intellectual
property licensed to us by third parties;
|
|
|
|
the success of our new SAP Enterprise Support offering;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain, license and enforce intellectual property
rights;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully implement our business strategy,
including our SAP Business ByDesign offering as well as our SAP
NetWeaver platform strategy;
|
|
|
|
our ability to procure new licenses, renew existing maintenance
agreements and to sell additional professional services,
particularly with respect to our installed customer base;
|
|
|
|
consolidation, competition and rapid technological change in the
software industry;
|
|
|
|
liquidity and the valuation of our financial assets,
particularly in the current economic climate;
|
|
|
|
quarterly fluctuations in our sales and the related difficulty
of accurately forecasting future revenue, particularly in the
current economic climate;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to establish new relationships and enhance existing
relationships with third party distributors, software suppliers,
systems integrators and value-added resellers;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our IT security measures and general IT
system availability and Internet-related privacy concerns;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain and expand market acceptance of our
services and products, and customer satisfaction with the
implementation and installation of our products;
|
|
|
|
unauthorized or premature disclosure of our future strategies,
technologies and products;
|
|
|
|
social and political instabilities, terrorist attacks or other
acts of violence or war;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain key personnel with specialized knowledge
and technology skills;
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively manage our headcount and our
geographically dispersed employee base;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
international regulatory and global political conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage to avoid
negative impacts on our financial position or results of
operations resulting from the settlement of claims; and
|
|
|
|
other risks and uncertainties.
|
2
We describe these and other risks and uncertainties in more
detail under Item 3 Key Information Risk
Factors.
If one or more of these uncertainties or risks materializes, or
if managements underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our
actual results may differ materially from those described in or
inferred from our forward-looking statements and information.
The words aim, anticipate,
believe, continue, could,
counting on, is confident,
estimate, expect, forecast,
intend, may, plan,
project, predict, seek,
should, strategy, want,
will, would, guidance,
outlook and similar expressions as they relate to us
are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such
information includes, for example, the statements made in
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects and Item 11. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, but also
appears in other parts of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The factors that could affect our future financial results are
discussed more fully under Item 3. Key
Information Risk Factors as well as elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
This Annual Report includes statistical data about the IT
industry derived from information published by sources
including: Gartner, Inc., or Gartner, a provider of market
information and strategic information for the IT industry;
International Data Group, or IDC, a provider of market
information and advisory services for the information
technology, telecommunications, and consumer technology markets;
investment bank Goldman Sachs; financial services company UBS;
and Forrester Research, a major market research company. This
type of data represents only the estimates of Gartner, IDC,
Goldman Sachs, UBS, Forrester Research and other sources of
industry data. SAP does not adopt nor endorse any of the
statistical information provided by sources such as Gartner,
IDC, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Forrester Research or other similar
sources that is contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
In addition, although we believe that data from these companies
are generally reliable, this type of data is inherently
imprecise. We caution you not to place undue reliance on this
data.
EXPLANATION OF
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
This document discloses certain financial measures, such as
non-GAAP revenues, non-GAAP expenses, non-GAAP operating income,
non-GAAP operating margin and constant currency revenue and
operating income measures that are not prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP and are therefore considered non-GAAP
financial measures. Our non-GAAP financial measures may not
correspond to non-GAAP financial measures that other companies
report. The non-GAAP financial measures that we report should be
considered as additional to, and not as substitutes for or
superior to, revenue, operating income, cash flows, or other
measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. Our non-GAAP financial measures included in this
document are reconciled to the nearest U.S. GAAP measures,
except for projected 2009 figures for which we provide only a
projected non-GAAP financial measure without reconciling to a
corresponding projected U.S. GAAP measure because a
reconciliation is not practicable due to the prospective nature
of the information.
We believe that it is of interest to investors to receive
certain supplemental historical and prospective non-GAAP
financial information used by our management in running our
business and making financial, strategic and operational
decisions in addition to financial data prepared in
accordance with U.S GAAP to attain a more
transparent understanding of our past performance and our future
results. Beginning in 2008, we use these non-GAAP measures
consistently as defined below in our planning, forecasting,
reporting, compensation and external communication. Specifically,
|
|
|
|
|
Our management uses these non-GAAP numbers rather than
U.S. GAAP numbers as the basis for financial, strategic and
operating decisions.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
The variable remuneration components of our board members and
employees that are tied to our companys growth and
operating performance are based on SAPs achievement of its
targets for non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP software and
software-related revenue growth at constant currencies, and
non-GAAP operating margin at constant currencies.
|
|
|
|
The annual budgeting process involving all management units is
based on non-GAAP revenues and non-GAAP operating income numbers
rather than U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
|
|
|
All monthly forecast and performance reviews with all senior
managers globally are based on these non-GAAP measures rather
than U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
|
|
|
Both company-internal target setting and guidance provided to
the capital markets are based on non-GAAP revenues and non-GAAP
income measures rather than U.S. GAAP numbers.
|
We believe that our non-GAAP measures are useful to investors
for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
The non-GAAP measures provide investors with insight into
managements decision-making since management uses these
non-GAAP measures to run our business and make financial,
strategic and operating decisions.
|
|
|
|
The non-GAAP measures provide investors with additional
information that enables a comparison of year-over-year
operating performance by eliminating certain direct effects
resulting from the acquisition of Business Objects.
|
Our non-GAAP financial measures reflect adjustments based on the
following items, as well as the related income tax effects:
Non-GAAP Revenue
Revenues in this document identified as non-GAAP
revenue have been adjusted from the respective
U.S. GAAP numbers by including the full amount of Business
Objects support revenues that would have been reflected by
Business Objects had it remained a stand-alone entity but which
are not permitted to be reflected as revenues under
U.S. GAAP as a result of fair value accounting for Business
Objects support contracts in effect at the time of the Business
Objects acquisition.
Under U.S. GAAP we record at fair value the Business
Objects support contracts in effect at the time of the
acquisition of Business Objects. Consequently, our
U.S. GAAP support revenues, our U.S. GAAP software and
software-related service revenues and our U.S. GAAP total
revenues for periods subsequent to the Business Objects
acquisition do not reflect the full amount of support revenue
that Business Objects would have recorded for these support
contracts absent the acquisition by SAP. Adjusting revenue
numbers for this nonrecurring revenue impact provides additional
insight into our ongoing performance: The support contracts are
typically one-year contracts, and we expect customers will renew
them, which would result in revenues from the support fees.
However, we cannot provide absolute assurance that these
contracts will be renewed.
Non-GAAP Operating
Expense
We exclude acquisition-related charges, which are defined as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of intangibles acquired in business
combinations and certain standalone acquisitions of intellectual
property;
|
|
|
|
Expense from purchased in-process research and development; and
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses as far as incurred in connection with a
business combinations.
|
4
Non-GAAP Operating
Income and Non-GAAP Operating Margin
Operating income and operating margin in this document
identified as non-GAAP operating income and
non-GAAP operating margin have been adjusted from
the respective operating income and operating margin numbers as
recorded under U.S. GAAP by adjusting for the above
mentioned non-GAAP revenues and expenses.
We include these non-GAAP revenues and exclude these non-GAAP
expenses for the purpose of calculating non-GAAP operating
income and non-GAAP operating margin when evaluating the
continuing operational performance of the Company because these
expenses generally cannot be changed or influenced by management
after the acquisition other than by disposing of the acquired
assets. As management at levels below the Executive Board has no
influence on these expenses we generally do not consider these
expenses for purposes of evaluating the performance of
management units. As we believe that our Company-wide
performance measures need to be aligned with the measures
generally applied by management at varying levels throughout the
Company we exclude these expenses when making decisions to
allocate resources, both on a Company level and at lower levels
of the organization. In addition, we use these non-GAAP measures
to gain a better understanding of the Companys comparative
operating performance from period-to-period and as a basis for
planning and forecasting future periods. Considering that
management at all levels of the organization is heavily focused
on our non-GAAP measures in our internal reporting and
controlling, we believe that it is in the interest of our
investors that they are provided with the same information.
We believe that our non-GAAP financial measures described above
have limitations, which include but are not limited to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The eliminated amounts may be material to us.
|
|
|
|
Without being analyzed in conjunction with the corresponding
U.S. GAAP measures the non-GAAP measures are not indicative
of our present and future performance, foremost for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additional insight into our potential future financial
performance that our non-GAAP revenue numbers are intended to
provide assumes that Business Objects customers renew their
maintenance contracts. Projections of our future revenues made
based on these numbers would be overstated if such maintenance
renewals do not occur.
|
|
|
|
While our non-GAAP income numbers reflect the elimination of
certain acquisition-related expenses, no eliminations are made
for the additional revenues that result from the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related one-time charges that we eliminate in
deriving our non-GAAP income numbers are likely to recur should
SAP enter into material business combinations in the future.
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related amortization expenses that we eliminate
in deriving our non-GAAP income numbers are recurring expenses
that will impact our financial performance in future years.
|
|
|
|
While our non-GAAP revenue numbers are adjusted for a one-time
impact only, our non-GAAP expenses are adjusted for both
one-time and recurring items. Additionally, the revenue
adjustment for the fair value accounting for Business Objects
support contracts and the expense adjustment for one-time and
recurring acquisition-related charges do not arise from a common
conceptual basis as the revenue adjustment aims at improving the
comparability of the initial post-acquisition period with future
post-acquisition periods while the expense adjustment aims at
improving the comparability between post-acquisition periods and
pre-acquisition periods. This should particularly be considered
when evaluating our non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP
operating margin numbers as these combine our non-GAAP revenues
and non-GAAP expenses despite the absence of a common conceptual
basis.
|
5
We believe, however, that the presentation of the non-GAAP
measures in conjunction with the corresponding U.S. GAAP
measures provides useful information to management and investors
regarding present and future business trends relating to our
financial condition and results of operations. We therefore do
not evaluate our growth and performance without considering both
non-GAAP measures and U.S. GAAP measures. We caution the
readers of this document to follow a similar approach by
considering our non-GAAP measures only in addition to, and not
as a substitute for or superior to, revenues or other measures
of our financial performance prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP.
Constant
Currency Period-Over-Period Changes
We believe it is important for investors to have information
that provides insight into our sales. Revenue measures
determined under U.S. GAAP provide information that is
useful in this regard. However, both growth in sales volume and
currency effects impact period-over-period changes in sales
revenue. We do not sell standardized units of products and
services, so we cannot provide data expressed in such units to
present changes in the volume of products and services sold. To
provide information that may be useful to investors in breaking
down and evaluating sales volume changes, we do present
information adjusted for foreign currency effects about revenue
changes and various values and components relating to operating
income. We calculate constant currency year-over-year changes in
revenue and operating income by translating foreign currencies
using the average exchange rates from the previous (comparator)
year instead of the report year.
We believe that data on constant currency period-over-period
changes has limitations, particularly because the currency
effects that are eliminated constitute a significant element of
our revenues and expenses and may materially affect our
performance. We therefore limit our use of constant currency
period-over-period changes to the analysis of changes in volume
as one element of the full change in a financial measure. We do
not evaluate our growth and performance without considering both
constant currency period-over-period changes on the one hand and
changes in revenues, expenses, profit, or other measures of
financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP
on the other. We caution the readers of this report to follow a
similar approach by considering constant currency
period-over-period changes in measures of financial performance
only in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to,
changes in revenues, expenses, income or other measures prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
6
PART I
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY
INFORMATION
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
The following table presents selected consolidated financial
information of SAP for the five most recent fiscal years. The
selected consolidated financial information of SAP is a summary
of, is derived from and is qualified by reference to, our
consolidated financial statements, with the exception of the
2008 US$ amounts which are unaudited and are provided for the
convenience of readers. The selected consolidated balance sheet
data as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the
selected consolidated income statement data for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP.
However, we have not included our audited consolidated financial
statements for those periods in this document. The based
selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and the selected consolidated income statement
data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements,
which are included in Item 18. Financial
Statements and have been audited by KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG),
independent registered public accountants, whose report appears
on
page F-1
of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
US$(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except earnings per share data
|
|
|
Income Statement
Data(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
16,097
|
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
8,509
|
|
|
|
7,514
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
Earnings per share based on income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Earnings per share based on net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
US$(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except earnings per share data
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
19,761
|
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
|
9,503
|
|
|
|
9,040
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
10,068
|
|
|
|
7,233
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
5,782
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
Subscribed
capital(3)
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Short-term financial
debt(4)
|
|
|
3,236
|
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Long-term financial
debt(4)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts presented in US$ have been
translated for the convenience of the reader at 1.00 to
US$1.3919, the Noon Buying Rate for converting 1.00 into
dollars on December 31, 2008. See
Exchange Rates for recent exchange rates
between the Euro and the dollar. This convenience translation is
not included in our financial statements and, accordingly, our
independent registered public accounting firm has not audited
these US$ amounts.
|
|
(2)
|
|
All figures are based on
continuing operations except for Net income. See Note 11 to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements for further discussion on our
discontinued operations. As these discontinued operations were
acquired by us in 2005 the 2004 income statement data does not
reflect any discontinued operations.
|
|
(3)
|
|
On December 15, 2006 there
was a fourfold increase in the number of shares under a capital
increase pursuant to German law that resulted in an increase to
subscribed capital of approximately 950 million common
shares. Furthermore, the 2007 and 2008 figures reflect
cancellations of 23 million and 21 million treasury
shares effective September 7, 2007 and September 3,
2008, respectively. See Item 9. The Offer and
Listing General for more detail of the share
increase and the cancellation of shares.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The balances include financial
debt representing bank loans, overdrafts and convertible bonds
issued to facilitate settlement of share-based compensation
plans (See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees Share-Based Compensation Plans.).
Short-term is defined as having a remaining life of one year or
less; long-term is defined as having a remaining term exceeding
one year. The significant increase in short-term debt during
2008 is due to debt incurred to finance the acquisition of
Business Objects and the related incremental obligations under
the Business Objects equity programs.
|
EXCHANGE RATES
The prices for ordinary shares traded on German stock exchanges
are denominated in euro. Fluctuations in the exchange rate
between the euro and the dollar affects the dollar equivalent of
the euro price of the ordinary shares traded on the German stock
exchanges and, as a result, may affect the price of the ADRs in
the United States. See Item 9. The Offer and
Listing for a description of the ADRs. In addition, SAP AG
pays cash dividends, if any, in euro. As a result, any exchange
rate fluctuations will also affect the dollar amounts received
by the holders of ADRs on the conversion into dollars of cash
dividends paid in euro on the ordinary shares represented by the
ADRs. The deposit agreement with respect to the ADRs requires
the depositary to convert any dividend payments from euro into
dollars as promptly as practicable upon receipt.
A significant portion of our revenue and expenses is denominated
in currencies other than the euro. Therefore, fluctuations in
the exchange rate between the euro and the respective currencies
to which we are exposed may materially affect our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Foreign Currency Exchange Rate
Exposure. For our foreign currency risk and hedging
strategy see Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure About Market Risk Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk.
8
The following table sets forth the average, high and low Noon
Buying Rates for the euro expressed as U.S. dollars per
1.00.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Average(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1.2478
|
|
|
|
1.3625
|
|
|
|
1.1801
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.2400
|
|
|
|
1.3476
|
|
|
|
1.1667
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.2661
|
|
|
|
1.3327
|
|
|
|
1.1860
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.3797
|
|
|
|
1.4862
|
|
|
|
1.2904
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1.4695
|
|
|
|
1.6010
|
|
|
|
1.2446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
1.5923
|
|
|
|
1.5559
|
|
August
|
|
|
1.5569
|
|
|
|
1.4660
|
|
September
|
|
|
1.4737
|
|
|
|
1.3939
|
|
October
|
|
|
1.4058
|
|
|
|
1.2446
|
|
November
|
|
|
1.3039
|
|
|
|
1.2525
|
|
December
|
|
|
1.4358
|
|
|
|
1.2634
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
1.3946
|
|
|
|
1.2804
|
|
February
|
|
|
1.3064
|
|
|
|
1.2547
|
|
March (through March 9, 2009)
|
|
|
1.2674
|
|
|
|
1.2549
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The average of the applicable Noon
Buying Rates on the last day of each month during the relevant
period.
|
The Noon Buying Rate on March 9, 2009 was US$1.2565 per
1.00.
DIVIDENDS
Dividends are jointly proposed by SAP AGs Supervisory
Board (Aufsichtsrat) and Executive Board
(Vorstand) based on SAP AGs year-end stand-alone
statutory financial statements, subject to approval by the
shareholders and are officially declared for the prior year at
SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Dividends
paid to holders of the ADRs may be subject to German withholding
tax. See Item 8. Financial Information
Other Financial Information Dividend Policy
and Item 10. Additional Information
Taxation.
9
The following table sets forth in euro the annual dividends paid
or proposed to be paid per ordinary share in respect of each of
the years indicated. The amounts shown in the table for 2005 and
prior years are retrospectively adjusted for the effect of the
fourfold increase in the number of shares resulting from the
capital increase effective December 15, 2006 pursuant to
German law. One SAP ADR currently represents one SAP AG ordinary
share. Accordingly, the final dividend per ADR is equal to the
dividend for one SAP AG common share and is dependent on the
euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The table does not reflect
tax credits that may be available to German taxpayers who
receive dividend payments. If you own our ordinary shares or
ADRs and if you are a U.S. resident, refer to
Item 10. Additional Information
Taxation, for further information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Paid
|
|
|
|
per Ordinary
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
(1)
|
2005
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
(1)
|
2006
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
(1)
|
2007
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
(1)
|
2008 (proposed)
|
|
|
0.50
|
(2)
|
|
|
0.63
|
(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Translated for the convenience of
the reader from euro into U.S. dollars at the Noon Buying Rate
for converting euro into U.S. dollars on the dividend payment
date. The depositary is required to convert any dividend
payments received from SAP as promptly as practicable upon
receipt.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Subject to approval of the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders of SAP AG to be held on
May 19, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Translated for the convenience of
the reader from euro into U.S. dollars at the Noon Buying Rate
for converting euro into U.S. dollars on March 9, 2009 of
US$1.2565 per 1.00. The depositary is required to convert
any dividend payments received from SAP as promptly as
practicable upon receipt. The dividend paid may differ due to
changes in the exchange rate.
|
The amount of dividends paid on the ordinary shares depends on
the amount of profits to be distributed by SAP AG, which depends
in part upon our performance. The timing and amount of future
dividend payments will depend upon our future earnings, capital
needs and other relevant factors in each case as proposed by the
Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of SAP AG and approved
at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
RISK FACTORS
Economic, Political
and Regulatory Risks
The current global economic crisis and general uncertainty in
global economic conditions has caused, and may in the future
cause, a reduction and deferral in demand for our products,
negatively impacting our business, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows. Global economic conditions
may worsen in the future, exacerbating this negative impact.
The purchase and implementation of SAP software products
typically constitutes a significant portion of our
customers overall corporate budgets. As a result, customer
willingness to invest in acquiring and implementing SAP products
generally varies with economic and other business conditions.
Recently, economic conditions have deteriorated significantly in
the regions in which we do business and in the industries in
which our customers operate. Specifically, there has been a
significant reduction in the availability of credit, increased
rates of default and bankruptcy, decreased consumer spending and
a substantial decline in most major equity markets. In addition,
there has been nearly unprecedented volatility in global capital
and banking markets as well as in currency markets in certain
countries. As a result of deterioration in global economic
conditions and
10
financial markets, we have experienced and expect to continue to
experience for the foreseeable future a broad range of adverse
effects, including but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased IT investments generally;
|
|
|
|
Decreased customer demand for our software and services,
including order delays and cancellations;
|
|
|
|
Customers inability to obtain credit on acceptable terms,
or at all, to finance purchases of our software and services;
|
|
|
|
Insolvency of customers, partners and key suppliers, leading to
a negative impact on our business;
|
|
|
|
Increased risk in collectability of accounts receivable. For
example, the global economic crisis has led to greater
write-offs of accounts receivables for SAP in 2008 and may lead
to greater write-offs in the future;
|
|
|
|
Increased reserves for doubtful accounts;
|
|
|
|
Increased price competition for our products and services;
|
|
|
|
Decreased customer confidence; and
|
|
|
|
Pressure on our operating margin.
|
Continued deterioration of global economic conditions, including
the severe recession in the United States and other countries
and further disruptions in the credit and financial markets
worldwide, will likely have a negative impact on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows which
could be significant. In particular, our profitability and cash
flows might be significantly adversely affected by the current
and any continuing deterioration of the economic conditions in
Europe or the United States because we derive a substantial
portion of our revenue from software licenses and services in
those geographic regions. Additionally, an important feature of
our long-term strategy for growth is to increase our offerings
for the small and midsize enterprise segment. Consumer hesitancy
or limited availability of finance may constrict the business
operations of our customers and our channel, development, and
implementation partners, and consequently impede our own
operations. The consequences may include restrained or delayed
investments, late payments, bad debts, and even insolvency among
our customers and business partners. These have already had an
effect on our revenue growth and incoming payments, and the
impact may continue. In addition, our prices could come under
more pressure due to more intense competition or deflation. If
current economic conditions persist or worsen, we expect that
our revenue growth and results of operations will continue to be
negatively impacted. Finally, an extended period of further
economic deterioration could exacerbate the other risks we
describe in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
See Item 4. Information About SAP
Business by Region for information on the regions in which
we operate and Item 4. Information About
SAP Revenue by Industry Sector for information
on the industries in which our customers operate.
Continued
deterioration of global economic conditions could make it
increasingly difficult for us to accurately forecast demand for
our products and services, and could cause our revenue and
operating results to fall short of expectations.
Our revenue and operating results can vary and have varied in
the past, from quarter to quarter. Our revenue in general, and
in particular our software revenue, is difficult to forecast for
a number of reasons. See the risk factor below entitled
Our sales are subject to quarterly fluctuations and our
sales forecast may not be accurate for additional details.
Current economic conditions make it even more difficult for us
to accurately forecast demand for our products and services. As
a result, future quarterly revenue and operating results could
fall below our expectations, likely resulting in a decline in
our stock price.
11
Our
global business activities subject us to economic, regulatory
and other risks which could harm our business, operating results
and financial condition.
Our products and services are currently marketed in over 120
countries in the Europe, Middle East and Africa
(EMEA), North America and Latin America
(Americas) and Asia Pacific Japan (APJ)
regions. Sales in these regions are subject to risks inherent in
transacting business globally, including, in particular:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic or political conditions in each country or
region;
|
|
|
|
conflict and overlap among different tax structures;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences of doing business in a
particular region;
|
|
|
|
the management of an organization spread over various
jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
|
regulatory constraints such as import and export restrictions,
competition law regimes, legislation governing the use of the
Internet, additional requirements for the development and
distribution of software and services, trade restrictions,
changes in tariff and freight rates and travel and communication
costs;
|
|
|
|
In Brazil, India, and China, and elsewhere, certain regulatory
constraints in the form of, for example, special levies on
cross-border royalty payments and bureaucratic import-control
processes impede international goods traffic and business
operations;
|
|
|
|
expenses associated with localizing our products and transacting
business in the local currency;
|
|
|
|
different requirements of workers councils and labor
unions across countries; and
|
|
|
|
higher costs of doing business internationally.
|
As we expand further into new regions and markets, these risks
could intensify. One or more of these factors could adversely
impact our operations globally or in one or more particular
countries or regions. As a result, our business, operating
results and financial condition could be harmed.
Social
and political instabilities including those caused by terrorist
attacks, the risk of war or international hostilities, pandemic
disease outbreaks and natural disasters could adversely impact
our business.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war as well as
the risk of pandemic disease outbreaks and natural disasters
could have a negative impact on the world economy, contribute
further to the current climate of economic decline and economic
and political uncertainty in many regions in which we do
business and affect our and our customers revenue and
investment decisions over an extended period of time.
Furthermore, such occurrences could make business continuity and
business travel more difficult. This social and political
instability could interfere with customers decision making
processes and our ability to sell products and provide services
to them.
12
Market Risks
Our
future revenue is dependent in part upon our installed customer
base continuing to license additional products, renew
maintenance agreements and purchase additional professional
services; a decision not to renew contracts or not to purchase
more of our products or services could adversely impact our
business.
Our large installed customer base traditionally has generated a
large portion of our revenue. We have increased our customer
base by acquiring other companies and by extending our channel
partner ecosystem. Our support strategies are under constant
review and development to assist us in addressing our
customers broad range of requirements. In 2008 we rolled
out SAP Enterprise Support services, which we believe is more
extensive than the support offerings of many of our competitors.
Customers with current contracts pay support fees that increase
stepwise. Success in achieving our business goals depends
significantly on the success of our maintenance (support) models
and on our ability to deliver high-quality services. It is
possible that existing customers decide not to renew their
maintenance contracts with us or not to purchase more of our
products or services in the future. Such decisions by customers
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations.
Consolidation
in the software industry may result in unstable and/or decreased
demand for our software and stronger peer companies in the long
term.
The entire IT sector, including the software industry, has in
recent years experienced a period of consolidation through
mergers and acquisitions. We expect this trend to continue for
the foreseeable future. Although consolidations in the software
industry may create market opportunities for remaining entities,
any consolidation could create uncertainty among existing and
potential customers regarding future IT investment plans. In
turn, this could diminish customer demand for our products and
services and could result in longer sales cycles as customers
determine which company best addresses their needs. Also,
consolidated companies may emerge as stronger competitors with
more resources, a larger customer base and a wider variety of
product offerings than our own.
Due to
intense competition, our market share and financial performance
could decline.
The software industry has been and continues to be intensely
competitive. The market for our products continues to be
intensely competitive, with technology continuing to evolve
rapidly. As part of our business strategy, over the last few
years we have focused our efforts in areas where demand is
expected to grow more rapidly. In particular, we have focused on
the completion of our service-oriented architecture (SOA) road
map, customer relationship management solutions, solutions for
small and midsize enterprises, as well as industry-tailored
solutions for specific industries such as retail and financial
services. Our expansion from traditional large enterprise
resource planning (ERP) product offerings to our new product and
services offerings exposes us to competitors varying in size,
geographic location and specialty. Current and potential
competitors have established and may continue to establish
cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties
to increase the ability of their products to address customer
needs better than we do. Competition, with respect to pricing,
product quality and functionalities/features, and consulting and
support services, could increase substantially and result in
price reductions, cost increases or loss of market share.
The continuing trend towards outsourcing business processes to
external providers (business process outsourcing, or
BPO) and other software-based services could result
in increased competition for us with systems integrators,
consulting firms, telecommunications firms, computer hardware
and software vendors and other IT service providers.
13
The software application delivery model often referred to as
SaaS, or software as a service, is popular
particularly in the mid-market due to its low initial cost
requirements and Web-based operability. Our on-demand solutions
are targeted at midsize enterprises and we face strong
competition in this SaaS arena.
In response to competition, we have been required in the past,
and may be required in the future, to furnish additional
discounts or other concessions to customers or otherwise modify
our pricing practices. These developments have impacted and may
increasingly negatively impact our revenue, earnings and market
share.
Business Strategy
Risks
Demand
for our newly introduced products such as SAP Business ByDesign
may not develop as planned and our mid-market strategy may not
be successful.
We are investing significant resources in developing and
marketing new and enhanced products and services. Demand for and
customer acceptance of recently introduced products and services
are subject to a high level of uncertainty, especially due to
the current global economic crisis and the resulting global
economic uncertainty.
Targeting midsize companies with the aim of building a leading
position in the mid market is a key part of our strategy. To
that end, expanding our network of business partners and
creating the infrastructure for volume business are of great
importance. To tap potential business in the lower mid-market,
we have spent approximately 242 million beginning in
2007 through 2008 in sales channels, processes, infrastructure,
and human resources, all oriented toward new customer
relationships and a larger, more diversified partner ecosystem.
Our newly architectured mid-market solutions are in contrast to
our traditional software solution offerings due to their
different approach to market and different product appeal to a
large mass of midsize companies that traditionally have not
considered purchasing an integrated business application to
support their core business functions.
Despite our efforts, demand for these products and services may
not develop, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial position and results of operations or cash
flows.
Any
failure to develop new relationships and enhance existing
relationships with third-party distributors, software suppliers,
system integrators and value-added resellers that help sell our
products and services may adversely affect our
revenues.
We have entered into agreements with a number of leading
suppliers of computer software and hardware and other technology
providers to enable compatibility of certain of the products
produced by such suppliers with our software products. Also, we
have supplemented our consulting and support services (in the
areas of product implementation, training and maintenance)
through alliance partnerships with third-party hardware and
software suppliers, systems integrators, and consulting firms.
Most of these agreements and alliances are of relatively short
duration and are non-exclusive. In addition, we have established
relationships relating to the resale of certain of our software
products by third parties. These third parties include
value-added resellers and, in the area of application hosting
services, certain computer hardware vendors, systems integrators
and telecommunications providers. Our growth strategy includes
commencing and maintaining relationships with independent
software vendors and value added resellers for our products
targeted at small and midsize enterprises. Most of these third
parties and business partners have similar arrangements with our
competitors. In addition, some of these third parties also
produce their own standard application or technology integration
software in competition with SAP.
There can be no assurance that these third parties or business
partners will continue to cooperate with us when our agreements
or partnerships expire or are up for renewal. In addition, there
can be no assurance that these third parties and partners will
devote sufficient resources to promote, sell, support and
integrate our
14
products to enable us to compete successfully with other
software vendors. Finally, there can be no assurance that these
third parties and partners will provide high-quality products or
services, or that actions taken or omitted to be taken by these
parties will not adversely affect us. The failure to obtain
high-quality products or services that enable us to compete
successfully or to renew such agreements or partnerships could
adversely affect our ability to continue to develop product
enhancements and new solutions that keep pace with anticipated
changes in hardware and software technology and
telecommunications. In addition, any of these failures could
adversely affect our ability to penetrate target markets;
consequently, demand for our software products and services
could decline.
Human Capital Risks
If we
were to lose the services of members of management and employees
who possess specialized knowledge and technology skills, we may
not be able to manage our operations effectively or develop new
products and services.
If our highly skilled and specialized personnel leave the
Company and qualified replacements or new resources are not
available or if we decide to invest in additional resources in
certain areas we may not be able to manage our operations
effectively to achieve our targets. Especially as we embark on
the introduction of new and innovative technology offerings, we
are relying on being able to build up and maintain a specialized
workforce with deep technological know-how to ensure an optimal
implementation of such new technologies in accordance with our
customers demands. Most of our current employees, with the
exception of selected managers, are subject to employment
agreements or conditions that do not contain post-employment
noncompete provisions and, in the case of most of our existing
employees outside of Germany, permit the employees to terminate
their employment on relatively short or no notice. There can be
no assurance that we will continue to be able to attract or
retain the personnel we require to develop and market new and
enhanced products and to market and service our existing
products and conduct our operations successfully. Further,
recruiting of personnel may expose us to claims from other
companies seeking to prevent their employees from working for a
competitor.
If we do
not effectively manage headcount as well as our geographically
dispersed employee base, our business may not operate
efficiently, and this could have an adverse impact on our
results of operations.
Changes in employees and infrastructure might lead to a mismatch
between our costs and revenues in the future. In January 2009 we
announced our intention to reduce the number of positions
globally to 48,500 by the end of the year, and to take advantage
of any attrition during this time to assist in meeting our year
end goal. If we do not manage our intended reduction in number
of positions as planned, or if we are unable to manage
effectively our geographically dispersed workforce, our business
may not operate efficiently and this could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations.
Organizational and
Governance-Related Risks
We are
subject to significantly increased governance-related regulatory
requirements both in Germany and the United States.
As a stock corporation domiciled in Germany and listed in
Germany and the United States, SAP is subject to
governance-related regulatory requirements under both
jurisdictions. These standards are among the highest standards
worldwide and have grown considerably in the past few years. In
the United States, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the
establishment, ongoing assessment and certification of an
effective system of internal control over financial reporting
accompanied by stringent documentation efforts for companies and
their external auditors. Also in the United States, the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act requires not
15
only accurate books and records, but also sufficient controls,
policies and processes to ensure business is conducted without
the influence of bribery and corruption on an international
scale. Since the German federal government issued the
10-point program to strengthen corporate integrity and
investor protection in the past years, various new
legislation was passed to improve investor protection,
transparency and shareholder democracy. Additionally, most of
our subsidiaries face increasing local regulatory requirements
many of which have been expanded in recent years. Given the high
level of complexity of these laws there can be no assurance that
we will not be held in breach of certain regulatory
requirements, for example, through fraudulent or negligent
behavior of individual employees, our failure to comply with
certain formal documentation requirements or otherwise. Any
corresponding accusation against us, whether merited or not, may
have a material adverse impact on our reputation as well as the
trading price of our ordinary shares and ADRs.
Principal
shareholders may be able to exert control over our future
direction and operations.
As of March 9, 2009, the beneficial holdings of SAP
AGs principal shareholders and the holdings of entities
controlled by them constituted in the aggregate approximately
28% of the outstanding ordinary shares of SAP AG. If SAP
AGs principal shareholders and the holdings of entities
controlled by them vote in the same manner, this could delay,
prevent or facilitate a change in control of SAP or other
significant changes to SAP AG or its capital structure. See
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related-Party
Transactions Major Shareholders, for further
information.
Sales of
ordinary shares by principal shareholders could adversely affect
the price of our capital stock.
The sale of a large number of ordinary shares by any of the
principal shareholders and related entities could have a
negative effect on the trading price of our ADRs or our ordinary
shares. We are not aware of any restrictions on the
transferability of the shares owned by any of the principal
shareholders or related entities.
U.S.
judgments may be difficult or impossible to enforce against us
or our Board members.
Currently, except for John Schwarz and Bill McDermott, all
members of SAP AGs Executive Board and all members of the
Supervisory Board are non-residents of the United States. A
substantial portion of the assets of SAP and our Board members
are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not
be possible to effect service of process within the United
States upon
non-U.S. resident
persons or SAP or to enforce against
non-U.S. resident
persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts predicated upon
the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the
United States. In addition, awards of punitive damages in
actions brought in the United States or elsewhere may be
unenforceable in Germany.
SAPs
Sustainability Strategy may be difficult to maintain, and a
failure by us to meet customer or partner expectations or
generally accepted sustainability standards could have an
adverse impact on our results of operations, our business and
our reputation.
For SAP, sustainability is a standard that guides our engagement
in new business opportunities holistically
encompassing profitable growth, environmental value, and
societal benefit. Therefore, we address sustainability risks,
especially relating to climate change, corporate integrity,
human resources management, the ethical behavior of suppliers,
the accessibility, user-friendliness, and safety of our
products, privacy and data protection in connection with the use
of SAP products, and the digital divide the belief
that peoples access to digital and information technology
is dependent on social factors. If our sustainability practices
are not sufficient to meet the expectations of our customers and
partners or generally accepted sustainability standards, this
could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, our
business and our reputation.
16
Communication and
Information Risks
Our IT
security measures may be breached or compromised and we may
sustain unplanned IT system unavailability.
The Internet is a public network, and data is sent over this
network from many sources. We rely on encryption, authentication
technology and firewalls to provide security for confidential
information transmitted to and from us over the Internet. Anyone
who circumvents our security measures could misappropriate
proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services
or operations. In the past, computer viruses and software
programs that disable or impair computers have been distributed
and have rapidly spread over the Internet. Computer viruses
could be introduced into our systems or those of our customers
or suppliers, which could disrupt our network or make it
inaccessible to customers or suppliers. Our security measures
may be inadequate to prevent security breaches, and our business
would be harmed if we do not prevent them. In addition, we may
be required to expend significant capital and other resources to
protect against the threat of security breaches and to alleviate
problems caused by breaches as well as by any unplanned
unavailability of our internal IT systems.
Wide
acceptance of the use of Internet-based transactions may be
hindered due to privacy concerns and privacy breaches.
Consumers have significant concerns about secure transmissions
of confidential information, especially financial information,
over public networks like the Internet. This remains a
significant obstacle to general acceptance of
e-commerce
and certain aspects of our business, such as our on-demand
business. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in
the field of cryptography or other events or developments could
result in compromises or breaches of security such as those that
have generated widespread media attention. Continued
high-profile cases of inadvertent and unauthorized disclosure of
personal information could have the effect of substantially
reducing the use of the Web for commerce and communications and
therefore could adversely impact our long-term strategy for
growth.
We may
not be able to prevent unauthorized or premature disclosure of
our future strategies, technologies and products, resulting in
competitive disadvantage.
We have established a range of IT security standards and
organizational communication protocols to help ensure that
internal, confidential communications and information about
sensitive subjects such as our future strategies, technologies
and products are not improperly or prematurely disclosed to the
public. There is no guarantee that the established protective
mechanisms will work in every case. SAPs competitive
position could be compromised considerably if confidential
information about the future direction of our strategies,
technologies or products becomes public knowledge.
Financial Risks
Our
liquidity and the valuation of our financial assets may continue
to be adversely impacted by the global economic
downturn.
We use global centralized financial management to control liquid
assets, interest, and currencies with the goal of maintaining
Group liquidity at a level that is adequate to meet our
obligations. Most SAP companies are included in our central cash
management system. High levels of liquid assets and marketable
securities provide a strategic reserve, helping keep SAP
flexible, sound, and independent. We have a syndicated credit
line, and other bilateral credit lines on which we can draw if
necessary. Due to the current global economic conditions and the
credit markets in particular, refinancing conditions have become
markedly more difficult for the banks, which result in less
advantageous borrowing terms for businesses. We cannot therefore
exclude the possibility that the
17
risk of increased financing expense could materially affect our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
SAPs investment policy is set out in our internal treasury
guideline document, which is a collection of rules that apply
globally to all companies in the Group. Among its stipulations
is a requirement that we invest only in assets from investment
grade rated issuers. The weighted average rating of our
financial assets is between A and A+. We
pursue a policy of cautious investment characterized by wide
portfolio diversification with a variety of counterparties,
predominantly short-term investments, and standard investment
instruments. We cannot, however, exclude the possibility that
the current financial crisis could negatively affect our assets.
Because
we conduct our operations throughout the world, our results of
operations may be affected by currency fluctuations.
Although the euro has been our financial and reporting currency
since January 1, 1999, a significant portion of our
business is conducted in currencies other than the euro.
Approximately 64% of our consolidated revenue in 2008 was
attributable to operations in non-euro member states and
translated into euro. As a consequence, period-to-period changes
in the average exchange rate in a particular currency versus the
euro can significantly affect reported revenue and operating
results. In general, appreciation of the euro relative to
another currency has a negative effect on reported results of
operations, while depreciation of the euro has a positive
effect, although such effects may be short term in nature. We
continually monitor our exposure to currency risk and pursue a
company-wide foreign exchange risk management policy. We have in
the past and expect to continue in the future to at least partly
hedge such risks with certain financial instruments. There can
be no assurance that our hedging activities, if any, will be
effective. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk.
Our sales
are subject to quarterly fluctuations and our sales forecast may
not be accurate.
Our revenue and operating results can vary and have varied in
the past, sometimes substantially, from quarter to quarter. Our
revenue in general, and in particular our software revenue, is
difficult to forecast for a number of reasons, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the relatively long sales cycles for our products;
|
|
|
|
the large size and extended timing of individual license
transactions;
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction of new products or product
enhancements by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in customer budgets;
|
|
|
|
seasonality of a customers technology purchases; and
|
|
|
|
other general economic and market conditions, such as the global
economic crisis that emerged in late 2008.
|
As many of our customers make and plan their IT purchasing
decisions at or near the end of calendar quarters, and with a
significant percentage of those decisions being made during the
fourth quarter, even a small delay in purchasing decisions could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
While our dependence on single, large scale sales transactions
has decreased in recent years due to a relative increase in the
number of license transactions concluded by SAP, mainly
attributable to SAPs strengthened focus on the small and
midsize enterprises (SME) segment, there can be no assurance
that our results will not be adversely affected by the loss or
delay of one or a few large sales, which continue to occur
especially in the large enterprise segment.
We use a pipeline system to forecast sales and
trends in our business. Our sales personnel monitor the status
of proposals, including the date when they estimate that a
customer will make a purchase decision and the potential revenue
from the sale. While this pipeline analysis may provide us with
some guidance in business
18
planning, budgeting and forecasting, these pipeline estimates
may not consistently correlate to revenue in a particular
quarter and could cause us to improperly plan, budget or
forecast. Because our operating expenses are based upon
anticipated revenue levels and because a high percentage of our
expenses are relatively fixed in the near term, any shortfall in
anticipated revenue or delay in recognition of revenue could
result in significant variations in our results of operations
from quarter to quarter or year to year. A continued
deterioration in global economic conditions would make it
increasingly difficult for us to accurately forecast demand for
our products and services, and could cause our revenue, results
of operations and cash flows to fall short of expectations. We
have increased over recent years, and plan to continue to
increase in the future, the following expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
expansion of our operations;
|
|
|
|
research and development directed towards new products and
product enhancements; and
|
|
|
|
development of new distribution and resale channels,
particularly for small and midsize enterprises.
|
Such future increases in expenditures will depend, among other
things, upon economic conditions, ongoing results and evolving
business needs. To the extent such expenses precede or are not
subsequently followed by increased revenue, our quarterly or
annual operating results would be materially adversely affected
and may vary significantly from preceding or subsequent periods.
The
market price for our ADRs and ordinary shares may be
volatile.
The trading prices of our ADRs and ordinary shares have
experienced and may continue to experience significant
volatility. The current trading prices of the ADRs and the
ordinary shares reflect certain expectations about the future
performance and growth of SAP, particularly on a quarterly
basis. However, our revenue can vary and has varied, sometimes
substantially, from quarter to quarter, causing significant
variations in operating results and in growth rates compared to
prior periods. Any shortfall in revenue or earnings from levels
projected by us quarterly or from projections made by securities
analysts has had and could have an immediate and significant
adverse effect on the trading prices of the ADRs or the ordinary
shares in any given period. Additionally, we may not be able to
confirm our projections of any such shortfalls until late in the
quarter or following the end of the quarter because license
agreements are often executed late in a quarter. Finally, the
stock prices for many companies in the software sector have
experienced wide fluctuations, which have often not been
directly related to an individual companys operating
performance. The trading prices of our ADRs and ordinary shares
have in the past and could in the future fluctuate in response
to various factors including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us
or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
technological innovation by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our results of operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in revenue and revenue growth rates on a consolidated
basis or for specific geographic areas, business units, products
or product categories;
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or financial community;
|
|
|
|
general market conditions specific to particular industries;
|
|
|
|
litigation to which we are a party;
|
|
|
|
general and country specific economic or political conditions
(particularly wars, terrorist attacks, etc.); and
|
|
|
|
proposed and completed acquisitions or other significant
transactions by us or our competitors.
|
19
Many of these factors are beyond our control. In the past,
companies that have experienced volatility in the market price
of their stock have been subject to shareholder lawsuits
including securities class action litigation. Any such lawsuits
against us, with or without merit, could result in substantial
costs and the diversion of managements attention and
resources, resulting in a decline in our results of operations
and our stock price.
Our
revenue mix may vary and may negatively affect our profit
margins.
We generally license our software products for an upfront
license fee based on the number and types of users or other
applicable metrics. Maintenance fees are typically established
based on a specified percentage of the license fee. Variances or
slowdowns in our licensing activity may negatively impact our
current and future revenue from maintenance and services since
such maintenance and services revenues typically follow and are
dependent upon software sales. Historically, the profit margin
from our services arrangements is lower than that of our
software sales. Any decrease in the percentage of our total
revenue derived from software licensing could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
We have introduced new licensing models such as on-demand and
subscription models which typically result in revenue being
recognized over time. Although revenue from such new models is
still relatively insignificant, we expect it to grow in the
future. A significant portion of the related cost of developing,
marketing and providing our solutions to customers under such
new models could be incurred prior to the recognition of
revenue, thus impacting our profit margin in the short term.
Managements
use of estimates may affect our results of operations and
financial position.
Our financial statements are based upon the accounting policies
as described in Note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. Financial Statements.
Such policies require management to make significant estimates,
assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses.
Facts and circumstances used by management in making estimates
and judgments may change from time to time and may result in
significant variations, including adverse effects on our results
of operations or financial position.
Revenue
recognition accounting pronouncements and other financial
reporting standards may adversely affect our reported financial
information.
We regularly monitor our compliance with all of the financial
reporting standards and any new pronouncements that are relevant
to us. Findings of our monitoring activity or the pronouncement
of new financial reporting standards may require us to change
our revenue recognition or other financial reporting policies,
to alter our operational policy to reflect new or amended
financial reporting standards, or to restate our published
financial reporting information. We cannot exclude the
possibility that this may have a material impact on our
financial position and results of operations. Our significant
accounting policies are described in Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
The cost
of derivative instruments for hedging of share-based
compensation plans may exceed the benefits of those
arrangements.
To reduce the volatility of the income statement impact of our
share-based payment programs, we use derivative instruments to
hedge risks resulting from future cash flows associated with
STAR (stock appreciation rights) and SAP SOP (SAP stock option
plan) plans. We cannot exclude the possibility that the expense
of hedging the STAR and SOP plans will exceed the related
benefits or that a decision not to hedge a particular cash flow
stream will prove to be disadvantageous.
20
Project Risks
Customer
implementation and installation of our products involves
significant resources and is subject to significant
risks.
Implementation of SAP software is a process that often involves
a significant commitment of resources by our customers and is
subject to a number of significant risks over which we may have
little or no control. These risks include in particular:
|
|
|
|
|
shortage of our trained consultants available to assist
customers in the implementation of our products;
|
|
|
|
requirements that do not meet customer expectations or the
software does not fit to the business model of the customer;
|
|
|
|
third-party consultants do not have the know-how or resources to
successfully implement the software;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of the software is destabilized by custom
specific software development; and
|
|
|
|
the safeguarding measures offered by SAP are not implemented by
customers and partners.
|
Some of our customers have incurred significant third-party
consulting costs and experienced protracted implementation times
in connection with the purchase and installation of SAP software
products. In addition, the success of new SAP software products
introduced by us may be adversely impacted by the perceived or
actual time and cost to implement the SAP software products. We
cannot guarantee that we can reduce or eliminate protracted
installation or significant third-party consulting costs, that
shortages of our trained consultants will not occur, or that our
costs to perform installation projects will not exceed the fees
we receive when fixed fees are charged by us. Therefore,
unsuccessful customer implementation projects could result in
claims from customers, harm SAPs reputation, and cause a
loss of future revenues.
Product Risks
We depend
on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of
this technology could delay implementation of our products or
force us to pay higher license fees.
We license numerous third-party technologies that we incorporate
into our existing products, on which, in the aggregate, we may
be substantially dependent. There can be no assurance that the
licenses for such third-party technologies will not be
terminated, that the licenses will be available in the future on
terms acceptable to us or that we will be able to license
third-party software for future products. In addition, we may be
unable to renegotiate acceptable third-party license terms to
reflect changes in our pricing models. While we do not believe
that one individual technology we license is material to our
business, changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could
lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing or to SAP
software products becoming inoperable or their performance being
materially reduced, with the result that we may need to incur
additional development or licensing costs to ensure continued
performance of our products. The risk increases if we acquire a
company or a companys intellectual property assets that
have been subject to third-party technology licensing and
product standards less rigorous than our own. We cannot exclude
the possibility that adverse effects may result from a product
of a business we acquire.
Undetected
errors, shortcomings in our security features or delays in new
products and product enhancements may result in increased costs
to us and delayed demand for our products.
To achieve customer acceptance, our new products and product
enhancements often require long development and testing periods.
These development efforts are subject to multiple risks. For
example,
21
scheduled market launches can be delayed and products may not
completely satisfy our stringent quality standards or meet
customer expectations, market needs, or comply with local
standards and requirements. Generally, first releases are
licensed to a controlled group of customers after a validation
process. New products and product enhancements may contain a
number of undetected errors, or bugs, or prove incapable of high
volume data processing when they are released. There can be no
assurance that all errors and requirements can be corrected to
the customers satisfaction. As a result, we may be faced
with customer claims for cash refunds, damages, replacement
software or other concessions. The risk of errors and their
adverse consequences may increase as we seek to introduce a
variety of new software products simultaneously. Significant
undetected errors or delays in introducing new products or
product enhancements could affect market acceptance of SAP
software products, and any such events could have a material
adverse effect on SAPs financial condition, cash flow,
results of operations and reputation.
The use of SAP software products by customers in
business-critical applications and processes and the relative
complexity of some of our software products create the risk that
customers or other third parties may pursue warranty,
performance or other claims against us for actual or alleged
failures of SAP software products, the provision of services or
application hosting. We have in the past been, and may in the
future continue to be, subject to such warranty, performance or
other similar claims.
In addition, certain of our Internet browser-enabled products
include security features that are intended to protect the
privacy and integrity of customer data. Despite these security
features, our products may be vulnerable to break-ins and
similar problems caused by Internet users, such as hackers
bypassing firewalls and misappropriating confidential
information. Such break-ins or other disruptions could
jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted
through the computer systems of our customers. Addressing
problems and claims associated with such actual or alleged
failures could be costly and could have a material impact on our
operations.
Although our agreements generally contain provisions designed to
limit our exposure as a result of actual or alleged failures of
SAP software products or the provision of services, such
provisions may not cover every eventuality or be effective under
applicable law. Any claim, regardless of its merits could entail
substantial expense and require the devotion of significant time
and attention by key management personnel. The accompanying
publicity of any claim, regardless of its merits, could
adversely affect the demand for our software and our reputation.
If we are
unable to keep up with rapid technological changes, we may not
be able to compete effectively.
Our future success depends in part upon our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
continue to enhance and expand our existing products and
services;
|
|
|
|
provide
best-in-class
business solutions and services; and
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and provide new services that
satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements, keep
pace with technological developments and are accepted in the
market.
|
There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
anticipating and developing product enhancements or new
solutions and services to adequately address changing
technologies and customer requirements, that we will bring new
solutions, solution enhancements or services to market in
advance of our competitors or that we will be able to generate
enough revenues to offset the significant research and
development costs we incur in bringing these products and
services to the market. We may fail to anticipate and develop
technological improvements, to adapt our products to
technological change, changing country-specific regulatory
requirements, emerging industry standards and changing customer
requirements or to produce high-quality products, enhancements
and releases in a timely and cost-effective manner in order to
compete with applications and other technologies offered by our
competitors.
22
Our SAP
NetWeaver platform strategy may not succeed or may make certain
of our products less desirable.
Since the introduction of the SAP NetWeaver platform, we have
been executing on our application platform vision. While we
remain an enterprise application provider, the objectives of our
platform strategy are to decrease the cost of integration,
enable process flexibility and innovation, and help extend our
partner ecosystem.
With solutions built on the SAP NetWeaver platform, we are
targeting to enhance our position in the enterprise software
industry by extending core applications.
To promote a broad adoption of the SAP NetWeaver platform, we
are working with certified third-party independent software
vendors (ISVs) that use SAP NetWeaver as a basis to develop and
offer their own certified solutions. The continued success of
the SAP NetWeaver technology platform depends critically on our
maintaining a dynamic network of ISVs developing their own
business applications for SAP NetWeaver. Any ISV-developed
solutions with significant errors may reflect negatively on our
reputation and thus indirectly impede our own business
operations. In addition, as with any open platform design, the
greater flexibility provided to customers to use data generated
by non-SAP software may reduce customer demand for certain of
our software products. The failure to receive acceptance from
customers of the SAP NetWeaver platform, development by
competitors of superior technology or significant errors in the
solution could have a material adverse impact on our revenues,
earnings and results of operations.
See Item 4. Information about SAP
Description of the Business Evolution of SAP
Solutions, for a more detailed description of SAP
NetWeaver.
Other Operational
Risks
We are
subject to claims and lawsuits against us that may result in
adverse outcomes.
We are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits. Adverse
outcomes in some or all of the claims pending against us might
result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief
against us that could adversely affect our ability to conduct
our business. While management currently believes that resolving
all of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not
have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
position, income or cash flows, litigation and other claims are
by their nature subject to uncertainties, and managements
view of these matters may change in the future. Actual outcomes
of litigation and other claims may differ from the judgments
made by management in prior periods, which could result in a
material adverse impact on our financial position and results of
operations, as well as SAPs reputation. See Note 24
to our consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements for more information.
Third
parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property
rights, which could result in damages being assessed against us
and our ability to use certain technologies being limited in the
future.
Third parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we
have infringed their intellectual property rights. Our software
products have been, and we believe will increasingly be, subject
to such claims as the number of products in our industry segment
grows, as we expand our products into new industry segments and
as the functionality of products overlap. Any claims, with or
without merit, could preclude us from utilizing certain
technologies in our products, be time-consuming, result in
costly litigation, require us to pay damages to third parties,
require us to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on
terms that are not favorable to us, cause product shipment
delays, subject our products to an injunction, require a
complete or partial re-design of the relevant product, result in
delays by customers in making spending decisions, or damage our
reputation.
23
Additionally, the use of open-source software has become more
prevalent in the development of software solutions in the
software industry. Accordingly, we are selectively embedding in
our software certain third-party open-source software
components, which include software code subject to their
respective open-source licenses that may require that the code
be freely transferable. There can be no assurance that, in the
future, a third party will not assert that our products or the
third-party software we deploy must be made publicly available
under the terms of an open-source license, resulting in the loss
of our proprietary advantage in the affected product.
If we
acquire other companies, we may not be able to integrate their
operations effectively and, if we enter into strategic
alliances, we may not work successfully with our alliance
partners.
To complement or expand our business, we have made and expect to
continue to make acquisitions of additional businesses, products
and technologies. In addition, we have entered into, and expect
to continue to enter into, a variety of alliance arrangements.
Our current strategy for growth includes, but is not limited to,
the acquisition of companies and businesses with the aim of
strengthening our geographic reach, broadening our offerings in
particular industries, or complementing our technology
portfolio. Managements negotiation of potential
acquisitions or alliances, and managements integration of
acquired businesses, products or technologies could divert its
time, focus and resources. In addition, some transactions in
which we may encounter risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
inability to successfully integrate the acquired business,
including integrating different business and licensing models;
|
|
|
|
inability to integrate the acquired technologies or products
with current products and technologies;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of ongoing business;
|
|
|
|
inability to retain key technical and managerial personnel of
the acquired business;
|
|
|
|
dilution of existing equity holders caused by capital stock
issuances to the stockholders of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
incurrence of debt or significant cash expenditures;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in implementing, remediating or maintaining controls,
procedures and policies;
|
|
|
|
potential adverse impact on relationships with partners or
third-party providers of technology or products;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees and customers;
|
|
|
|
integration of the acquired companys accounting, human
resource and other administrative systems;
|
|
|
|
regulatory constraints; and
|
|
|
|
problems with product quality, product architecture, legal
contingencies, product development issues or other significant
risks that may not be detected through the due diligence process.
|
In addition, acquisitions of additional businesses may require
an immediate charge to income for any in-process research and
development costs of companies being acquired and amortization
costs related to certain tangible and intangible assets that are
acquired. Ultimately, certain acquired businesses may not
perform as anticipated, resulting in charges for the impairment
of goodwill and other intangible assets. Such write-offs and
amortization charges may have a significant negative impact on
operating margins and net income in the quarter in which the
business combination is completed and subsequent periods. In
addition, we have entered and expect to continue to enter into
alliance arrangements for a variety of purposes including the
development of new products and services. There can be no
assurance that any such products or services will be
successfully developed or that we will not incur significant
unanticipated liabilities in connection with such arrangements.
24
We may not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other
problems encountered in connection with any such transactions
and may therefore not be able to receive the intended benefits
of those acquisitions or alliances.
We may
not be able to adequately obtain, license or enforce
intellectual property rights.
We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination
of applicable trade secret, copyright, patent and trademark
laws, license and non-disclosure agreements and technical
measures. All of these measures afford only limited protection
and our proprietary rights could be challenged, invalidated,
held unenforceable, or otherwise circumvented. Some proprietary
rights may be vulnerable to disclosure or misappropriation by
employees, partners, or other third parties. Despite our
efforts, there can be no assurance that these protections will
be adequate to prevent third parties from obtaining, using, or
selling what we regard as our proprietary technology and
information without authorization. There can also be no
assurance that third parties will not independently develop
technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to
our technology. Also, it may be possible for third parties to
reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use technology and
information that we regard as proprietary. Accordingly, we might
not be able to protect our proprietary rights against
unauthorized third-party copying or utilization, which could
adversely affect our competitive position and result in reduced
sales. Any legal action we bring to enforce our proprietary
rights could be costly, distract management from day-to-day
operations, and lead to claims against us, which could adversely
affect our operating results. In addition, such enforcement
actions could involve a partner or vendor and adversely affect
our ability, and our customers ability, to access that
partner or vendors products. In addition, the laws and
courts of certain countries may not offer effective means to
enforce our intellectual property rights.
We may
not be able to secure our business operations against disruption
and to safeguard our assets.
We attach great importance, as a software company, to securing
our business operations against disruption and to safeguarding
our assets. We have a number of measures in place to ensure that
our data and information technology, our physical assets, and
our organization are secure against attack from without and
within. There is nevertheless a risk that someone might misuse
or steal property, plant, or equipment or gain unauthorized
access to our facilities and to sensitive material, and might
use such material to SAPs detriment. Any such misuse,
stealing or other security breach could negatively impact our
assets, finances, or income.
Our
insurance coverage may not be sufficient to avoid negative
impacts on our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows resulting from the settlement of claims.
We maintain adequate insurance coverage for protection against a
diverse portfolio of risks. Our objective is to ensure that
financial effects of risk occurrences are excluded or limited to
the extent practicable at reasonable cost. Despite these
measures, certain categories of risks are not currently
insurable at reasonable cost. Even if we obtain insurance, our
coverage may be subject to exclusions that limit or prevent our
indemnification under those insurance policies. Further, we
cannot guarantee the ability of the insurance companies to meet
their claims liabilities. If this risk occurs, it may result in
significant adverse impact on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
We may
incur losses in connection with venture capital
investments.
In the past we acquired and expect in the future to continue to
acquire equity interests in technology-related companies. Many
of these enterprises currently generate net losses and require
additional capital outlay from their investors. Changes to
planned business operations may possibly affect the performance
of companies in which SAP holds investments, and that could
negatively affect the value of our investments. Moreover, under
German tax law, capital losses and impairments of equity
securities are not tax-deductible, which may negatively affect
our effective tax rate.
25
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ABOUT SAP
Our legal corporate name is SAP AG. SAP AG is translated in
English to SAP Corporation. SAP AG, formerly known as SAP
Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der
Datenverarbeitung, was incorporated under the laws of the
Federal Republic of Germany in 1972. Where the context requires
in the discussion below, SAP AG refers to our predecessors,
Systemanalyse und Programmentwicklung GbR
(1972-1976)
and SAP Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der Datenverarbeitung
GmbH
(1976-1988).
SAP AG became a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) in
1988. Our principal executive offices, headquarters and
registered office are located at Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, 69190
Walldorf, Germany. Our telephone number
is +49-6227-7-47474.
In 2008, we acquired Business Objects. With that acquisition, we
expanded our core solutions to address the needs of the business
user. In addition, as part of our legal entity rationalization
activities, we have integrated certain Business Objects
subsidiaries into the following significant SAP subsidiaries:
SAP Deutschland AG &Co. KG, SAP (Schweiz) AG, SAP
Nederland B.V., SAP Brasil Ltda and SAP Japan Co., Ltd.
For a discussion of our principal capital expenditures and
divestitures, see Item 4. Description of
Property Capital Expenditures.
We intend to make this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and other periodic reports publicly available on our Web site
(www.sap.com) without charge immediately following our
filing with the SEC. We assume no obligation to update or revise
any part of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, unless we are required to do so by law.
DESCRIPTION OF THE
BUSINESS
Overview
SAP was founded in 1972. Our core business is selling licenses
for software solutions and related support services. In
addition, we offer consulting, training and other services for
our software solutions. We develop and market our products and
services in close cooperation with independent business partners.
As of December 31, 2008, we had more than 82,000 customers
in over 120 countries and employed more than 51,500 individuals
at locations in more than 50 countries in the EMEA, Americas,
and Asia Pacific Japan regions. We are headquartered in
Walldorf, Germany. As of December 31, 2008, SAP consisted
of SAP AG and its network of 187 subsidiaries. We have three
lines of business that constitute our reportable segments:
product, consulting and training. We tailor our solutions to
serve the needs of customers in 25 specific industries, for
example banking, insurance, chemicals, healthcare, retail,
consumer products, and the public sector. For a discussion of
our geographic regions and industry sectors, see
Item 4. Information about SAP Description
of the Business Revenue by Industry Sector,
and Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
The Company is listed on several exchanges, including the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
under the symbol SAP.
Evolution of SAP
Solutions
With the vision to create standard application software for
real-time business processing, we introduced the first
generation of our software in 1973, initially consisting of a
financial accounting application.
The SAP R/2 system, our second generation of application
software, was then developed for mainframe, designed to handle
different languages and currencies and to integrate many aspects
of business, including distribution centers, field operations
centers, corporate headquarters, and sales offices.
26
We recognized the demand for more decentralized business
software solutions and designed the initial version of the SAP
R/3 system, moving from mainframe computing to the three-tier
architecture of database, application and user interface.
Introduced in 1992, SAP R/3 quickly became the category leader
in ERP systems. During the 1990s, we introduced several
solutions built on SAP R/3 to provide capabilities tailored to
specific industries.
In the early 2000s, we continued to expand our product offerings
to include the SAP Business Suite family of business
applications that help enterprises improve business operations
ranging from supplier relationships, production and warehouse
management to sales, administrative functions and customer
relationships. We introduced the successor to SAP R/3 called the
SAP ERP application, which is a component of SAP Business Suite.
We began in 2003 to adapt our portfolio of products to the new
environment, mapping a route to a flexible new enterprise
service-oriented architecture for software. A service-oriented
architecture (SOA) is an industry term referring to a software
architecture that supports the design, development,
identification, and consumption of standardized services across
the enterprise, thereby improving reusability of software
components and creating agility in responding to change. The
term service as used in service-oriented
architecture means a Web service that is a self-contained
functionality that can be accessed by applications across a
network using mechanisms based on Web standards. An
enterprise service, defined by us and our partners
and customers, is a series of Web services combined with
business logic that can be accessed and used repeatedly to
support a particular business process. Aggregating Web services
into business-level enterprise services provides more meaningful
building blocks for composing applications to automate
enterprise-scale business scenarios.
One key benefit of enterprise service-oriented architecture, or
enterprise SOA, is the ability to rapidly map complex business
processes with reusable enterprise services. Companies can use
enterprise services to flexibly compose or alter applications as
rapidly as their markets and business process needs change. Our
platform for realizing enterprise SOA is the SAP NetWeaver
technology platform. Together with the SAP NetWeaver technology
platform and a repository of enterprise services, SAP ERP can
serve as a business process platform, which is the unified
environment that companies implement to perform their core
business processes efficiently and to reorganize, extend, and
create new business processes flexibly. In other words, SAP
helps organizations establish their unique business process
platform by delivering ready-to-execute software for business
processes, reusable enterprise services that enable business
process steps, and the technology to compose and deploy software
that enables flexible business processes.
In 2007, SAP launched a new product, SAP Business ByDesign, a
comprehensive, adaptable, on-demand business software solution
for midsized companies. SAP Business ByDesigns
availability is restricted in a limited number of countries; we
intend to introduce other deployment modes.
In recent years, SAP has built a portfolio of solutions
addressing the needs of the business user. Business users
comprise a segment of the global workforce that has historically
remained outside of the enterprise software mainstream. In their
roles as decision makers, business users are generally not
directly involved in more structured business processes such as
customer relationship management or supply chain
management although their roles often involve the
supervision and analysis of these processes. In most cases, they
operate in a less structured environment, drawing on information
resources as diverse as spreadsheets and Internet sites.
However, their efforts can be enhanced by tools and applications
designed to help organize and manage information to optimize
everyday business activities and improve the way employees work.
To meet the needs of this group of users, SAP has delivered
several enhancements to its core applications, such as embedded
analytics in the SAP Business Suite. We have also developed new
products to address the needs of such business users who wish to
take advantage of enterprise information. Examples of such
products include Duet. Introduced in 2006, Duet is the first
product jointly developed and supported by SAP and Microsoft.
Duet enables employees to interact quickly and easily with
selected SAP business processes and data without leaving the
familiar Microsoft Office environment. SAP also acquired
Business Objects in early 2008. SAP and Business Objects quickly
27
embarked on a road map to transform their software for business
users into the emerging market for business performance
optimization which helps organizations see and
respond to business events in real time.
Mission and Strategy
Trends
and Orientation
In the face of continuous, accelerated change in the business
environment, executives must find ways to contend with shifting
pressures to ensure sustained competitiveness and profitable
growth. These rapid changes are driven by key transformational
forces, such as global economic uncertainty, hypercompetition, a
rising consumer power, and the quest for sustainability.
Recently, the pervasive effect of these pressures on the global
business environment has demonstrated that businesses have
become more interconnected than ever before. Business models are
evolving from linear value chains to collaborative networks with
the customer at the center. Within the context of these business
networks, each business focuses on what it does best while
working closely with other companies to improve the overall
customer experience. The business network is a new source of
competitive advantage for companies because it increases and
speeds innovation not only between companies, but
also with the end customer and allows risks to be
managed and shared with partners and suppliers.
The sharing of risks, knowledge, and processes is typical of
collaborative relationships in a business network, and it
benefits all of the collaborators. However, many companies are
reluctant to adopt this approach because their strategic
planning is isolated from their business operations. Technology
solutions can help them close the gap between strategy and
execution by linking decision-making systems to integrated,
end-to-end processes that can be easily extended to business
partners.
Mission
It is part of our mission to help customers resolve such
difficulties and thereby enable them to achieve profitable,
sustainable growth. To succeed, we wish to build from our
established leading position in the business software market and
accelerate business and IT innovation for firms and industries.
In striving for this goal, we are also contributing to global
economic development on a grand scale.
We offer solutions that help companies of all sizes close the
gap between strategy and execution. They include the SAP
Business Suite family of business applications, SAP NetWeaver,
the SAP BusinessObjects portfolio, SAPs offerings for
small businesses and midsize companies, and solutions to help
customers realize their sustainability goals. Our portfolio of
SAP software and services can help customers attain the
visibility, efficiency, and flexibility that enables them to
respond to changes in the business environment with more agility
and effect and capture the full benefits of business networks.
At the heart of our strategy stands customer value. We intend to
widen the market we address with more attractive offerings for
our customers including, for example, new data analysis and
decision support solutions for business users, and software
solutions scaled to small businesses and midsize companies.
Strategy
for Growth
Our traditional core customer base includes many large global
enterprises as well as midsize companies. Such global companies
use the SAP Business Suite applications, SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions, or SAP Business One to automate their business
transactions, enabling better management and governance. In our
traditional core business, we seek to win a greater share of our
customers wallet. We also aim to win new customers, for
instance companies that have been using custom software.
28
Our portfolios of solutions for 25 industries are a crucial
factor in our success. In 2008, we focused on strategic
industries with exceptional growth potential, including, for
example, banking, retail, communications, and the public sector.
Delivering solutions for business users process
owners and decision makers is a central element of
our strategy for growth. In 2008, we concluded the acquisition
of Business Objects and expanded our core solutions to address
what we identify as the three key needs of decision makers in
business. First, they need to make decisions more effectively
based on a broader array of structured and unstructured data
from sources both inside and outside the enterprise. Second,
business users need better tools and applications to support
collaborative decision making. Third, business users seek to
build competitive advantage by creating and managing business
networks with partners, suppliers, and customers. Our products
focus on these needs to help individuals, teams, and companies
better collaborate through business networks.
The SAP Business ByDesign solution is designed to open up a new
segment of the global market for us, smaller businesses with
between 100 and 500 employees. They have distinctly
different software needs: Getting their new IT solution running
quickly, at minimum risk and predictable cost, is often more
important for these customers than specific functional depth.
Many such companies do not believe that their needs can be met
by traditional software offerings or by the available on-demand
solutions.
The following measures will help us realize our full growth
potential:
|
|
|
|
|
Organic growth: Our primary growth strategy is to continue to
develop our own product portfolio and our own base of direct
customers by winning more customers and by selling
more to our existing customers.
|
|
|
|
Co-innovation: Collaborating with customers and partners remains
one of our central policies. We are investing more in our
partner ecosystem. This supports the development of solutions
built on the SAP NetWeaver technology platform and leverages
sales forces to address the various market and customer segments.
|
|
|
|
Smart acquisitions: With targeted strategic and
fill-in acquisitions that add to our broad solution
offering for individual industries or across industries, we gain
specific technologies and capabilities to meet the needs of our
customers.
|
THE SAP PORTFOLIO
We offer a portfolio of business software, technology, and
related services and support to meet the long-term requirements
and mission-critical needs of our customers. The main challenges
facing our customers are the current global economic recession,
hypercompetition, rapidly shifting consumer demand, the impact
of international economic integration, the accelerating pace of
innovation, and the quest for sustainability. To be equal to
these challenges, companies and public administrations must link
their strategic planning to their business operations, closing
the gap between strategy and execution. This is where
information technology solutions can help. They can link
decision-making systems to integrated, end-to-end processes that
can be easily extended to business partners.
Our portfolio of SAP software and services can help customers
respond to changes in the business environment with more agility
and effect, better capture the benefits of business networks,
and thus grow profitably. The goal at the heart of our portfolio
of software and services is therefore the best possible
combination of efficiency, insight, and flexibility:
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency Innovative business processes to optimize
operations: SAP connects and streamlines processes across our
customers businesses to drive efficiency and help enable
business operations to achieve strategic goals.
|
|
|
|
Insight Improved decisions for greater success: SAP
enables business people to make more insightful and timely
strategic decisions based on better information in the context
of specific business issues.
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
Flexibility Strategic and operational agility: With
SAP software, customers can more easily pursue new strategies
and capture the full benefits of business networks, because
business processes are flexible and the business platform is
extensible.
|
In addition, at the end of October we started our Best-Run Now
initiative, with special solution offerings to help businesses
of all sizes in difficult times of economic uncertainty. It
draws together software and service products to offer solutions
that can help companies rapidly make a difference in areas such
as liquidity, business intelligence (BI), procurement, and
people management. Flexible financing options and support for
implementation make it easier for customers to invest speedily.
We offer the following products and services:
|
|
|
* |
|
depending on form of contract
|
Solutions for Large
Enterprises
SAP
Business Suite
The flagship of our large-enterprise offerings is SAP Business
Suite software. SAP Business Suite applications provide
end-to-end business process support, reporting, and analytics.
Its core applications, industry applications and supplementary
applications are powered by the SAP NetWeaver technology
platform. Companies use this platform to design, compose, or
adapt processes to address the unique needs in their industry.
Core SAP
Business Suite Applications
The cornerstone of SAP Business Suite is the SAP ERP
application, an integrated enterprise resource planning
application. SAP ERP addresses the core business software
requirements of midsize businesses and large organizations
around the world in all industries and sectors. SAP
ERP includes four individual solutions that support key
functional areas: SAP ERP Financials, SAP ERP Human Capital
Management, SAP ERP Operations, and SAP ERP Corporate Services.
The other components of SAP Business Suite are:
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Customer Relationship Management (SAP CRM) application,
which helps companies acquire and retain customers, build
lasting relationships, and improve customer loyalty. Companies
can
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
choose between ways to deploy the application: as an on-premise
implementation, on-demand as Web-based CRM, or in a hybrid
solution that combines both. As our customers business
needs evolve, they can smoothly transition from one deployment
option to another at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Product Lifecycle Management (SAP PLM) application,
which helps companies manage, track, and control all
product-related and project-related information over the
complete product and asset life cycle and across the extended
supply chain. SAP PLM integrates all product-related information
needed to collaborate with business partners and supporting
processes, including product innovation, design and engineering,
quality and maintenance management, and control of environmental
issues.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Supplier Relationship Management application (SAP SRM),
which helps organizations in all industries accelerate and
optimize the supply cycle by improving their vendor
relationships. It provides strategic value through sustainable
cost savings, contract compliance, and quick time-to-value.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Supply Chain Management (SAP SCM) application, which
gives our customers a base for building transparent, flexible
communities of companies. By integrating all partners in the
supply chain, supply and demand can be synchronized along the
chain, and materials and knowledge can flow freely among all of
the partners concerned. That helps companies intelligently adapt
to changing market conditions and proactively respond to
shorter, less predictable product life cycles.
|
We first delivered enhancement packages providing regular
updates for SAP ERP in 2007. This unique delivery model, which
we introduced for the entire SAP Business Suite in 2008, makes
it simpler and faster for customers running SAP Business Suite
applications to adopt new product functions, industry-specific
features, and enterprise services. It also shields customers
from the complexity of multiple upgrades and offers them an
opportunity to reduce information technology (IT) costs by
consolidating their systems on a single platform and reducing
the number of separate software instances that need to be
maintained.
Our enhancement package model also gives customers planning
security. The SAP Business Suite applications are, and will for
the next several years remain, a stable platform on which
customers can, if they wish, regularly update their system. The
packages provide a reliable software enhancement process that
alleviates disruption and minimizes costs.
31
Industry
Solutions for Large Enterprises
SAP Business Suite delivers distinct solution portfolios for 25
different industries, including for example banking and
insurance, chemicals, healthcare, retail, consumer products, and
the public sector. Each industry solution portfolio delivers
powerful, industry-specific functions along with best practices
we have developed with our customers. Our industry solutions are
designed to meet the needs of the major industry sectors listed
below. We also offer solutions for numerous subsectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries
Chemicals
Mill Products
Oil & Gas
Mining
Discrete Industries
Aerospace & Defense
Automotive
Engineering, Construction & Operations
High Tech
Industrial Machinery & Components
Consumer Industries
Consumer Products
Retail
Wholesale Distribution
Life Sciences
|
|
Service Industries
Media
Logistics Service Providers
Airlines
Telecommunications
Utilities
Professional Services
Financial Services
Banking
Insurance
Public Services
Healthcare
Higher Education & Research
Public Sector
Defense & Security
|
Solutions for Small
Businesses and Midsize Companies
SAP offers three solutions for small businesses and midsize
companies that are easy to implement and use. They are designed
to best fit the needs of small businesses and midsize companies
that need solutions to help them manage customer relationships,
supplier relationships, financial operations, and supply chains.
SAP
Business
All-in-One
Midsize companies with industry-specific requirements can buy
SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions from our channel partners. Customers can deploy SAP
Business
All-in-One
on-premise or hosted by an SAP partner. If they choose hosting
by an SAP partner, the software is operated, maintained, and
monitored by experts in an external data center. The customer
does not have any maintenance and update work or any
upfront capital investment. SAP Business
All-in-One
is a complete package built on SAP ERP and SAP CRM, including
SAP Best Practices and preconfigured business scenarios
specially packaged for industry-specific implementation and use
by midsize companies. Approximately 1,100 partners also offer
660 qualified SAP Business
All-in-One
solutions with extra functions for specific microvertical
markets and specific geographic regions. The SAP Business
All-in-One
fast-start program provides the complete package together with
an online solution configurator and special tools for rapid live
implementation. It is currently the choice of approximately
13,450 customers in 50 countries.
SAP
Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign is specially designed for businesses with
100 to 500 employees that wish to benefit from a powerful
enterprise solution but do not wish to run an extensive IT
infrastructure. It enables companies to manage different
business processes in harmony on one system. They can choose
which business processes to include, and add more as and when
they are required. SAP Business ByDesign offers preconfigured
best-practice process support for financials, CRM, people
management, procurement, project management, and the supply
32
chain through a single, consistent user interface. This solution
is hosted on the Internet by SAP and provided to customers in
on-demand mode for a monthly fee. It is a completely new
business model for SAP. Currently it is available in China,
France, Germany, India, the United States, and the United
Kingdom. We are controlling the
ramp-up,
carefully selecting new customers and working in close
collaboration with them and with partners, and feeding their
experience back into product development.
SAP
Business One
The SAP Business One application is for small businesses,
typically with fewer than 100 employees and 30 users, that
are looking for an affordable, single system to cover core
operations such as financials, sales, and customer support.
Customers can deploy SAP Business One on-premise or hosted by a
partner, typically in less than one month. The solution is sold
and supported through a global network of approximately 1,200
certified partners. There are over 550 extensions available from
independent software vendors (ISVs) and more than 40 country
versions. By the end of 2008, SAP Business One had a base of
approximately 22,600 customers.
SAP BusinessObjects
Portfolio
Our solutions for business users help our customers toward
broader insight, aligned strategy, and risk- and
performance-optimized decisions. They close the gap between
strategy and execution.
SAP
BusinessObjects Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects BI solutions help simplify the ways that
decision makers use information, enabling business users to
access, format, analyze, navigate in, and share information
across their organization.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects information management (IM) solutions
help organizations improve their data quality, understand and
use information better, track data lineage for compliance
purposes, and ensure consistent semantics across the business.
|
|
|
|
The SAP BusinessObjects intelligence platform is a BI platform
with a wide scope that makes relevant BI available to users in
accordance with their roles. The platform has functions to drive
productivity and improves organization-wide decision-making
processes.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects enterprise performance management (EPM)
solutions empower organizations to manage all financial and
operational aspects of strategy, planning, budgeting,
forecasting, reporting, and analytic requirements.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects governance, risk, and compliance (GRC)
solutions help ensure that customers have the proper processes
and controls in place to realize transparent GRC.
|
Additional
Solutions for Business Users
Originally announced in April 2005, Duet software provides
seamless access to SAP business process software and data using
Microsoft Office on the business users desktop. Duet is
the result of collaboration between Microsoft and us, and is our
first joint product. In 2008, SAP and Microsoft deepened the
relationship and jointly enhanced Duet with additional business
scenarios, platform capabilities, and development tools.
Alloy software, which we developed with IBM, enables business
users to access SAP software and information from within the
familiar IBM Lotus Notes environment.
33
Business
Intelligence Solutions for Midsize Companies
The SAP BusinessObjects portfolio comprises BI solutions for
small businesses and midsize companies. The solutions are
specifically designed to address the needs of businesses in that
segment.
The Crystal Reports family of offerings is specially designed
for small business that need a stable, easy reporting solution
for all areas in their organization a solution that
can draw on virtually any source of data. Customers can use
proven functions for designing, managing, visualizing,
delivering, and scheduling reports. We can deliver it in
on-premise mode either on a server or as a single
desktop application or in on-demand mode.
SAP BusinessObjects Edge BI software is powerful, integrated BI
software for midsize companies. It delivers solutions for
operational reports, ad-hoc reporting and analysis, and
dashboards, with powerful data integration and quality.
Customers can start with options to address their immediate BI
requirements and build their solution as their needs
grow at a low investment cost.
The SAP
NetWeaver Technology Platform
IT organizations can use SAP NetWeaver to run business software,
such as SAP Business Suite applications and SAP-certified
partner solutions, from a single, unified technology platform.
As the technical foundation for a service-oriented architecture
(SOA), SAP NetWeaver helps IT organizations evolve their
existing IT infrastructure into a business process platform and
enhance the performance of their business processes.
It unifies numerous middleware functions into a single software
environment to reduce IT complexity and increase business
agility. The platform supports open standards, so companies can
use it to integrate heterogeneous systems and data from diverse
SAP and non-SAP sources. It can help organizations make their
business processes reliable, secure, and scalable. SAP NetWeaver
is a technology platform for modular composition of applications
and for the delivery of solutions.
Solutions
for Sustainability
We aim to enable companies to execute their sustainability
strategies using SAP software solutions, thereby making a
contribution to growing their corporate value, protecting their
brands, and mitigating compliance risks. We see sustainability
as anchored in a holistic approach to risk and opportunity from
social, environmental, and economic perspectives. With our SAP
BusinessObjects GRC solutions, we help customers better manage
risk and compliance, especially with regard to financial
processes, environmental concerns, and securing the global
supply chain. Additionally, SAP Business Suite software provides
business process efficiency, flexibility and insight,
representing a sound foundation for an organizations
sustainability endeavors.
These are solutions that are specifically oriented to
sustainability:
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Supply Chain Management application is designed to help
our customers achieve their sustainability objectives. Companies
can use it to consolidate orders and optimize shipments,
reducing
CO2
emissions and overall energy consumption.
|
|
|
|
The SAP Environment, Health, and Safety Management (SAP EHS
Management) application supports the management of environment,
health, and safety, industrial hygiene, and occupational health
processes as well as compliance for product safety, hazardous
substances, dangerous goods, and waste management. In addition,
SAP EHS Management helps ensure compliance with environmental
laws and policies as well as reduce associated costs, efforts,
and risks on plant and corporate levels. Companies can also use
this software to manage compliance with European law concerning
the registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of
chemicals (REACH), which helps them secure the right to market
their products.
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
The SAP Recycling Administration application helps ensure
compliance with worldwide recycling legislation for packaging,
batteries, and waste electrical and electronic equipment.
|
|
|
|
The SAP BusinessObjects Risk Management application helps
companies balance business opportunities and the associated
financial, legal, and operational risks. By specifically
monitoring high-impact risks to avoid incurring damaging market
sanctions, companies can maximize corporate performance.
|
Because SAP applications are integrated, they can efficiently
support compliance. Integration with SAP and non-SAP software
gives businesses increased visibility, supporting compliance
functions across the enterprise and its network of business
partners.
SAP Services
Portfolio
The SAP Services organization provides a broad array of
methodologies, tools, and certified partner offerings to meet
our customers business needs. The SAP Services portfolio
includes consulting, education, support, custom development, and
managed services. The offerings are categorized into
software-related services, and professional services and other
services. Software-related services are support services
provided by the SAP support units (SAP Active Global Support,
SAP BusinessObjects Customer Assurance, and SME
Services) and custom development provided by the SAP Custom
Development organization. Our professional services and other
services are consulting, education, and managed services.
SAP Services has a local presence in more than 50 countries and
runs 77 training centers, seven global support centers, and 10
custom development centers in Europe, Asia, and the Americas.
The 20,000 SAP service experts provide 24x7 support for customer
and partner SAP solution portfolios at a global level.
Software-Related
Services
The SAP Custom Development organization develops custom
solutions on the SAP platform that are tailored to meet
customers unique business requirements. The service
portfolio includes extending and enhancing existing SAP
solutions and building new business solutions.
The SAP support units offer a range of services to support our
customers before, during, and after implementation of our
software solutions. We provide around-the-clock technical
support. Moreover, the organization offers proactive, preventive
support services to protect and enhance our customers
current investments in SAP technology and applications. SAP
Enterprise Support services are a key element in our offering,
providing customers with holistic IT landscape support over the
full life cycle of their application with the aim of optimizing
the solutions operation. This covers a wide range of
software components: SAP products, custom developments
(including developments released by SAP), and partner solutions.
SAP Enterprise Support aims to reduce the total cost of
operation for our customers by delivering accelerated
innovation, protection of investment, and mission-critical
support as a solution provider based on defined service level
agreements. SAP Product Support, for our largest enterprise
customers, provides the tools and methodologies to take charge
of day-to-day support needs and to manage IT landscape
holistically over the life cycle of SAP applications. From
implementation to operation to change management, it helps to
ensure that SAP solutions contribute to the business goals of
our customers. The SAP Safeguarding support option helps our
customers mitigate the technical risks of an implementation or
upgrade and ensure smooth go-live and ongoing operations. The
SAP MaxAttention support option delivers to our largest
enterprise customers technical account management for their
entire solution life cycle and implementation of end-to-end
solution operations.
On-Demand
Software Services
The market defines on-demand as a software delivery format in a
one-to-many framework (one solution served to many customers)
that can include different pricing options such as license fees
with, optionally, service fees, or recurring subscription fees.
It complements the traditional model by giving software vendors
an
35
additional format in which to market software and create
sustainable value for customers. Customers now have a choice of
deployment modes (on premise and off premise) and of payment
models (perpetual license with, optionally, recurring service
fees or recurring subscription fees).
SAP on-demand software services focus on delivering the right
solutions to meet customers needs. It is therefore crucial
that our customers are able to choose between different
deployment options to suit their different business needs. In
the large enterprise space, we are currently seeing customers
adopting on-demand models for business processes, such as for
sales automation processes connected with on-premise ERP
software functions, that are less mission-critical than, for
example, core financial processes. As a result, we expect
gradual adoption of on-demand solutions to be the norm, leading
to hybrid landscapes with integration of on-demand and
on-premise solutions. These adoption patterns are a key driver
in our on-demand strategy evidenced, for example, by
our SAP CRM and SAP
E-Sourcing
on-demand solutions, and the SAP BusinessObjects Information
OnDemand portal.
Professional
Services and Other Services
The SAP Consulting organization offers planning, implementation,
and optimization services for business solutions. We advise and
support customers on designing business processes and IT
infrastructure and help customers with project management and
solution implementation and integration. We also help customers
optimize solutions and IT landscapes for changing business needs.
The SAP Education organization provides the training, services,
and tools required to assist SAP customers and partners in
maximizing the value they can create with their SAP solutions.
SAP Education offerings include training needs analysis,
certification assessments, learning software and tools, and
education in several delivery models, including classroom and
e-learning.
The SAP Managed Services organization provides application
management services and hosting services, running and managing
SAP solutions on behalf of customers.
Newly
Introduced Products and Product Versions
In 2008, we extended our solution portfolio, focusing primarily
on increasing integration between the product lines to help our
customers close the gap between strategy and execution. Working
with our customers and partners, we created new solutions in all
four core areas of our product portfolio: enterprise
applications and industry solutions for large enterprises, the
technology platform, solutions for small businesses and midsize
companies, and applications for business users. We also made a
number of strategic acquisitions to augment our portfolio of
products.
Expanded
Offerings for Enterprise Applications and Industry
Solutions
SAP Business Suite applications and all SAP industry solutions
were improved to adapt to the accelerating rate of change of the
market and customer expectations:
|
|
|
|
|
SAP ERP: In May, we announced the general availability of the
third enhancement package for the SAP ERP application.
Functional improvements provide stronger support for financial
close processes, treasury risk, cash management, and expense
management. In addition, human capital management capabilities
were improved to support end-to-end talent management processes.
For organizations that operate global shared-service
organizations, new facilities were delivered to support
intracompany processes and collaboration. Enhancement packages
enable our customers to add functions to their SAP software
packages stepwise without upgrades, which reduces the total cost
of managing their enterprise software implementation.
|
|
|
|
SAP Customer Relationship Management: Since the introduction of
SAP CRM 2007 in December 2007, we have experienced significant
market momentum on a global basis. In 2008, we further enhanced
the
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
capabilities of SAP CRM by delivering new processes to meet
industry-specific needs such as investigative case management
for the public sector, loyalty management for consumer-focused
industries, and service management for discrete industries. In
addition, we partnered with Research In Motion (RIM) to extend
SAP applications for business users by creating an SAP CRM
application accessed from BlackBerry mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Supplier Relationship Management: In June 2008, we
introduced new versions of our SAP
E-Sourcing,
SAP Contract Lifecycle Management, and SAP Spend Analytics (now
SAP BusinessObjects Spend Performance Management) applications.
These new versions were designed to improve the amount of
identified and negotiated savings, increasing sustained savings
to our customers. In November 2008, the first customers started
to use SAP SRM 7.0. SAP SRM now extends compliance capabilities
with enhancements to centralized sourcing and contract
management, services procurement, catalog management, supplier
enablement, usability, and accessibility to information. SAP SRM
also helps fully deliver on the complete source-to-pay process
for our customers.
|
|
|
|
SAP Supply Chain Management: In 2008, we released a new version
of SAP SCM with capabilities that leverage point-of-sales data
to improve planning accuracy and visibility, provide new
forecasting methods and enhanced collaboration with contract
manufacturers, and enable attribute- or characteristics-based
planning. There were also major enhancements to warehouse and
transportation management, such as graphical warehouse layout
modeling, improved visualization, tighter integration of export
controls, and increased utilization through enhanced integrated
processes. We have also expanded the radio-frequency
identification (RFID) and auto-ID solution footprint of SAP SCM
with support for serialization technology and the EPCIS
standard, a global communications standard by EPCglobal that
improves transparency in the tracking of goods.
|
|
|
|
SAP Product Lifecycle Management: SAP PLM now offers simplified
access to information within the context of a specific role to
help our customers improve productivity, reduce training,
eliminate manual activities, and make decisions more rapidly.
SAP PLM now includes an intuitive new user interface that
delivers information in the context of the role requesting it.
For example, the application now supports product-centric
viewing.
|
|
|
|
SAP solutions for automatic identification (auto-ID) and
serialization: With the release of the latest SAP Auto-ID
Enterprise offering, we delivered several new functions in the
fields of auto-ID and serialization technology. For example, SAP
object event repository now conforms to the EPCIS standard.
Delivery processing scenarios now fully support the
U.S. Department of Defense item unique identification
(IUID) schema, which enables the identification of all inventory
items based on bar codes containing unique, fixed number
sequences, as well as the electronic product code of EPCglobal
and other serialization procedures. This release also includes
significant performance enhancements to support high-volume
processes. Enhancements to SAP ERP included support for unique
item identification (UII) from supply chain to asset management.
In addition, the SAP Event Management 7.0 application enhanced
usability and flexibility in the Web Dynpro user interface.
|
|
|
|
SAP Manufacturing: By acquiring Visiprise, we
improved manufacturing operations management capabilities by
optimizing execution of manufacturing processes on the plant
floor. This acquisition is a continuation of our investment in
applications for the shop floor and leverages existing
capabilities offered by the SAP Manufacturing Integration and
Intelligence (SAP MII) application. Further enhancements
included support for outsourced manufacturing, dynamic
production planning across multiple plants, and advances in lean
planning and operations management. We also made it easier to
create composite applications for manufacturing operations that
can significantly improve employee productivity.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise energy management: In July 2008, we
delivered an enterprise energy management solution. It comprises
functions from SAP MII, the plant information solution from
OSIsoft, and the SAP Environment, Health, and Safety Management
application. The solution enables companies to
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
gather information on the use of energy throughout the
enterprise, identify areas for energy reduction, monitor the
implementation of energy excellence projects, and make the
results available throughout the enterprise. Companies can
therefore use the enterprise energy management solution to cut
their energy costs and emissions.
|
SAP
NetWeaver Technology Platform Enhanced
SAP NetWeaver helps companies standardize, consolidate, and
optimize their IT landscape and develop innovative integrated
business process solutions. With SAP NetWeaver, we enable IT
departments to create a powerful business process platform based
on the principles of SOA. Enhancements made to SAP NetWeaver in
2008 focus on helping our customers to simplify the way workers
use IT, to accelerate the design and integration of applications
for business processes, and to intelligently manage and access
relevant data across the entire enterprise.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment: We released the first
enhancement package for the SAP NetWeaver Composition
Environment offering, providing a lean, integrated,
standards-based development, modeling, and runtime environment.
Software developers and technical consultants can use it to
extend application logic and, depending on users needs,
compose new views and applications based on SAP software. The
enhancement package delivers the next generation of tools for
increasing process flexibility with new business process
management and business rules management capabilities.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Identity Management: The SAP NetWeaver technology
platform now contains embedded identity management capabilities
to help companies save time and money by optimizing the
administration of user accounts and passwords inside their
business network.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Master Data Management (SAP NetWeaver MDM):
Adoption of the SAP NetWeaver MDM component continues to grow
among companies in all industries and of all sizes. A new
version was delivered in the fourth quarter of 2008. It offers
extended flexibility for data modeling and support for complex
objects, enabling the deployment of a single master data
management repository for multiple data domains. SAP NetWeaver
MDM now links with SAP BusinessObjects Data Services software
through the MDM enrichment controller. It is thus a solution
with innovative data-integration and data-quality capabilities.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Information Lifecycle Management: SAP has
developed a three-pronged approach to information life-cycle
management that meets the complex IM needs of todays
organizations: data archiving, which focuses on keeping the
growth of data volume in check; retention management, which
deals with the life cycle of data from the time it is created
until it is destroyed; and a retention warehouse, which
addresses the decommissioning of legacy applications and systems.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Search: Launched in 2007, the SAP
NetWeaver Enterprise Search application gives business users
easy access to data in SAP systems, and intuitive links to find
related information and act on the data they find. In 2008, we
again significantly extended the range of information sources
available and delivered a new user interface for SAP NetWeaver
Enterprise Search.
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver Mobile: In 2008; we introduced a new version of
the mobile application platform, designed to enhance scalability
of the platform as well as mobile device management and mobile
security features.
|
New
Developments for Small Businesses and Midsize
Companies
We delivered innovative developments for our customers in the
small business and midsize company segment in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Business One: In 2008, SAP Business One version 2007 was
released into general availability. The new release offers many
new financial and reporting capabilities that are designed to
enable small
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
businesses to leverage local best practices and address local
business customs. Further, we introduced an industry solutions
program that allows our software solution partners to create
tightly integrated solutions that extend the power of SAP
Business One. Additionally, we enabled integration between SAP
Business One and SAP NetWeaver, to make it easy for SAP Business
One customers to connect with SAP Business Suite implementations
used by their headquarter offices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Business
All-in-One:
In the second half of 2008, we released an enhanced version of
SAP Business
All-in-One
with new customer relationship management functions. By
combining comprehensive, preconfigured SAP CRM and SAP ERP best
practices, midsize companies can now manage their customers,
their brands, and sales effectiveness together with core
business operations in one solution. This new CRM offering can
be added at any time to a customers SAP Business
All-in-One
solution or deployed standalone, and is available from SAP and
SAP channel partners.
|
|
|
|
SAP Business ByDesign: In October 2008, we released Feature Pack
1.2 for SAP Business ByDesign. This new release optimized
quality, performance, and system stability.
|
Broader
Portfolio for Business Users
In 2008, we combined SAP applications for business users with
Business Objects solutions to form a new SAP
BusinessObjects portfolio of solutions. We expanded our
applications and capabilities with innovative offerings to
optimize enterprise performance management, promote good
governance, risk management, and compliance, and improve
enterprise-wide information flows.
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects IM solutions: Shipped in March 2008 as part
of SAP BusinessObjects XI 3.0, our SAP BusinessObjects Data
Services XI 3.0 information management solution was one of the
first of its kind to combine data integration and data quality
in a single product. It offers companies new ways to optimize
performance, giving users access to the right information at the
right time in an easy user interface.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects intelligence platform: In 2008, we delivered
two releases of the intelligence platform: SAP BusinessObjects
XI 3.0 in March and SAP BusinessObjects XI 3.1 in September. SAP
BusinessObjects XI 3.0 makes relevant BI available to users in
accordance with their roles. The platform now also has new
functions to drive productivity and improves organization-wide
decision-making processes. Enhanced migration tools ease
upgrades for customers. Moreover, SAP BusinessObjects solutions
now work within practically any application environment: SAP
BusinessObjects XI 3.1 added broader language support,
integration with data sources from a variety of
vendors including HP, Microsoft, and
Netezza and native support for the 64-bit
architecture many customers now use for their business
applications.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects BI solutions: In 2008, we provided the first
platform to combine access to all information (whether it is
structured in databases or unstructured text) and access for all
people (whether they require reporting, query and analysis,
dashboards and visualization, or predictive analysis) in a
single environment. We also delivered the SAP BusinessObjects
Edge BI 3.0 solutions, addressing the BI needs of midsize
companies, and Crystal Reports Server 2008 software for small
businesses.
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects GRC solutions: In 2008, we released new
versions of the SAP BusinessObjects Access Control and SAP
BusinessObjects Process Control (formerly SAP GRC Process
Control) applications. SAP BusinessObjects Process Control
automates control monitoring in both SAP and non-SAP systems to
assist compliance, detects exceptions, and remedies issues with
workflow-based processes. The new version of SAP BusinessObjects
Access Control includes automated review and approval processes
on employee access throughout the enterprise, automatic
monitoring and detection of access violations, and reaffirmation
of mitigation controls. In addition, we have added extended
identity management integration and cross-platform capabilities
for non-SAP applications.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
SAP BusinessObjects EPM solutions: In 2008, we delivered several
new EPM solutions. The new version of the SAP BusinessObjects
Planning and Consolidation application helps customers easily
configure their planning and budgeting applications to run on
SAP NetWeaver and is also optimized for the Microsoft SQL
platform, supporting customers with diverse IT environments. A
new version of our SAP BusinessObjects Strategy Management
application is now integrated with SAP NetWeaver as well, adding
more business context to the strategy management process and
lowering the total cost of ownership for SAP customers. We
released other new EPM solutions in a new version of the SAP
BusinessObjects Spend Performance Management application,
delivering actionable visibility into purchasing detail, a new
version of the SAP BusinessObjects Financial Consolidation
application, which helps organizations leverage their BI
investment and enables users to quickly create and distribute
ad-hoc financial reports to key decision makers, and a
new version of the SAP BusinessObjects Profitability and Cost
Management application, which helps customers gain more precise
insight into cost drivers and their effect on profitability.
|
Jointly developed with Microsoft, Duet software enables business
users to use SAP-based data and business process software in the
familiar Microsoft Office environment. In December 2008, we
delivered a new Duet version for
ramp-up,
with extensions to all existing user processes and new
capabilities for purchasing management, recruitment management,
and workflow approvals. It comes with additional configuration
tools for the system administrator and with more languages.
We developed the Alloy software in conjunction with IBM. It
enables business users to access SAP software and information
from within the familiar IBM Lotus Notes environment. Alloy is
available from both companies from the first quarter of 2009.
SEASONALITY
As is common in the software industry, our business has
historically experienced the highest revenue in the fourth
quarter of each year, due primarily to year-end capital
purchases by customers. Such factors have resulted in 2008,
2007, and 2006 first quarter revenue being lower than revenue in
the prior years fourth quarter. We believe that this trend
will continue in the future and that our revenue will continue
to peak in the fourth quarter of each year and decline from that
level in the first quarter of the following year.
BUSINESS BY REGION
We operate our business in three principal geographic regions,
namely EMEA, which represents Europe, the Middle East and
Africa, the Americas, which represents both North and South
America, and Asia Pacific Japan (APJ), which represents Japan,
Australia and other parts of Asia. We allocate revenue amounts
to each region based on where the customer is located. See
Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for additional
information with respect to operations by geographic region.
40
The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the
total revenue attributable to each of our three principal
geographic regions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
Rest of EMEA
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EMEA
|
|
|
6,204
|
|
|
|
5,390
|
|
|
|
4,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Rest of Americas
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Rest of APJ
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total APJ
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA. In 2008, 54% (2007: 53%) of our total
revenues were derived from the EMEA region. Our total revenues
in the EMEA region grew to 6,204 million or by 15% in
2008 (2007: 10%). The EMEA region revenue growth reflects a 17%
(2007: 11%) increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 2%
decrease from currency effects. Revenues in Germany, SAPs
home market, increased by 9% (2007: 5%) to
2,193 million in 2008 (2007:
2,004 million). Germany contributed 35% (2007: 37%)
of EMEAs total revenues, which is a slight decrease of
2 percentage points compared to 2007. The remainder of
revenues for the EMEA region in 2008 originated mainly from the
following countries: the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland,
the Netherlands, Italy and Russia.
The number of our employees (full-time equivalents, or FTEs) in
the EMEA region increased by 3,171 FTEs or 13%, from 23,654 as
of December 31, 2007 to 26,825 as of December 31,
2008. This increase was mainly driven by the acquisition of
Business Objects. In Germany, the number of FTEs increased by 6%
to 15,582 as of December 31, 2008 compared to 14,749 as of
December 31, 2007. See Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees Employees.
Americas. 33% (2007: 35%) of our 2008 total
revenues were recognized in the Americas region. Revenues
increased by 8% (2007: 6%) to 3,872 million in 2008.
Revenues from the United States grew by 7% in 2008 (2007: 4%),
which represents a growth of 14% (2007: 13%) from changes in
volumes and prices and a 7% decrease from currency effects. The
United States contributed 74% (2007: 76%) of our total revenues
in the Americas region. The rest of the Americas region
increased revenues by 14% (2007: 12%) to 990 million,
which represents a growth of 20% (2007: 15%) from changes in
volumes and prices and a 6% decrease from currency effects.
These revenues were principally generated in Canada, Brazil and
Mexico.
In the Americas region the FTEs increased by 27% from 10,629 as
of December 31, 2007 to 13,457 at December 31, 2008.
This increase was mainly driven by the acquisition of Business
Objects.
APJ. In 2008, the Asia Pacific Japan region
contributed 13% (2007: 12%) of our total revenues, with most of
this revenue being derived mainly from the following major
contributing countries: Japan, Australia, India, China and South
Korea. In the Asia Pacific Japan region, revenues rose by 17%
(2007: 15%) to 1,489 million in 2008. Japan increased
by 15% (2007: 4%) to 515 million, which represents
35% (2007: 35%) of total revenues in the Asia Pacific Japan
region. The Japan region revenue growth reflects a 6% (2007:
14%) increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 9%
increase from currency effects. The rest of the Asia Pacific
Japan region (Japan excluded) increased revenues by 18% (2007:
22%), which represents a growth of 26% (2007: 24%) from changes
in volumes and prices and an 8% decrease from currency effects.
In the Asia Pacific Japan region, FTEs increased by 17% from
9,578 as of December 31, 2007 to 11,254 as of
December 31, 2008. This increase was due principally to the
acquisition of Business Objects.
41
REVENUE BY INDUSTRY
SECTOR
We have identified six industry sectors to focus our product
development efforts on the key industries of our existing and
potential customers and to provide best business practices and
specific integrated business solutions to those industries. We
allocate our customers to an industry at the outset of an
initial arrangement. All subsequent revenues from a particular
customer are recorded under that industry sector. The following
table sets forth the total revenues attributable to each of the
six industry sectors for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Process Industries
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
Discrete Industries
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
Consumer Industries
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
Service Industries
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Public Services
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES, MARKETING AND
DISTRIBUTION
SAP AG primarily uses its worldwide network of subsidiaries to
market and distribute SAPs products and services locally.
Those subsidiaries have entered into license agreements with SAP
AG pursuant to which the subsidiary acquires the right to
sublicense SAP AGs products to customers within a specific
territory. Under these agreements, the subsidiaries retain a
certain percentage of the revenue generated by the sublicensing
activity. We began operating in the United States in 1988
through SAP America, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of SAP AG.
Since then, the United States has become one of our most
important markets. In certain countries, we have established
distribution agreements with independent resellers rather than
with subsidiaries.
In addition to our subsidiaries sales forces, we have
developed an independent sales and support force through
value-added resellers unrelated to SAP who assume responsibility
for the licensing, implementation and support of SAP solutions,
particularly with regard to the SAP Business One application and
qualified SAP Business
All-in-One
partner solutions. We have also entered into alliances with
major system integration firms, telecommunication firms and
computer hardware providers to offer certain SAP Business Suite
applications.
We supplement certain of our consulting and support services
through alliances with hardware and software suppliers, systems
integrators and third-party consultants with the goal of
providing customers with a wide selection of third-party
competencies. The role of the alliance partner ranges from
pre-sales consulting for business solutions to the
implementation of our software products to project management
and end-user training for customers and, in the case of certain
hardware and software suppliers, to technology support.
Traditionally, our sales model has been to charge a one-time, up
front license fee for a perpetual license to our software
(without any rights to future products) which is typically
installed at the customer site. We now offer our solutions in a
variety of ways which include on-demand, hosted solutions, and
subscription-based models. Although revenues from these new
types of models currently are not material, we expect these
revenues to increase in the future.
Our marketing efforts cover large, multinational groups of
companies as well as small and midsize enterprises. We believe
our broad portfolio of solutions and services enables us to meet
the needs of customers of all sizes and across industries.
Capitalizing on the possibilities of the Internet, we actively
make use of online marketing. Some of our solutions can be
tested online via the Internet demonstration and evaluation
system, which also offers special services to introduce
customers and prospects to new solutions and services.
42
PARTNERSHIPS,
ALLIANCES AND ACQUISITIONS
Partnerships and strategic alliances are a key element of our
efforts to broaden the solutions and services offered to SAP
customers and to extend the markets for our products and
services. Our close collaboration with partners across the life
cycle of a customer solution is a key element in enhancing
customer satisfaction. We characterize our partnerships and
strategic alliances into categories such as services,
technology, software, hosting, content, education and support
that together constitute what we refer to as the partner
services network. Within most categories, our partners may
achieve the status of a local or global partner. We expect our
alliance partners to provide customers with joint strategic
solutions. Our partners generally have a strong position in a
particular line of business or cross-industry and complement the
range of SAP solutions in these areas. Our partner network
includes thousands of companies including independent software
vendors (ISVs), systems integrators, and business process
outsourcing (BPO) providers across all partner categories.
We have entered into agreements with a number of leading
software, technology and services companies to cooperate and
enable the software, technology and services offered by such
suppliers to complement our software products and vice versa.
In May 2006, we announced the launch of a US$125 million
global fund called the SAP NetWeaver Fund, which focuses on
strategic investments in select companies that are committed to
the SAP ecosystem and are building innovative solutions based on
the SAP NetWeaver technology platform. To date, the fund has
invested approximately one-fourth of the US$125 million in
minority interests of six technology companies providing
innovative solutions for various industries from manufacturing
to life sciences. We account for these investments using the
cost method unless we are able to significantly influence the
operating
and/or
financial decisions of the investee, in which case we use the
equity method of accounting.
SAPs acquisition strategy is to acquire complementary
application offerings and solutions through strategic and
fill-in acquisitions. These acquisitions give SAP
access to innovative technologies while enabling SAP to continue
to focus on organic growth.
In 2008, we acquired the outstanding shares of two unrelated
companies and the net assets of two other unrelated businesses
that developed
and/or
distributed software that is complementary to our business. We
have integrated the acquired businesses into the SAP operations
and solution offerings. We have retained the majority of the
employees from the businesses we acquired. The financial results
of these acquired businesses have been included in our financial
statements since the respective acquisition dates. The amount of
in-process research and development we expensed in 2008 as a
result of these acquisitions was immaterial.
In early 2008 we acquired Business Objects, a leading provider
of business intelligence solutions. We have successfully
integrated Business Objects with SAP. The acquisition cost, net
of cash held by Business Objects, amounted to approximately
4.2 billion. The combination of Business Objects
solutions with SAP technologies enables SAP to offer a unique
portfolio of products that can give business users
process owners and decision makers in business the
transparency they need for effective decision making.
The acquisition of Visiprise, Inc. (Visiprise) in July 2008
exemplifies our fundamental acquisition strategy as mentioned
above. Visiprise was a privately-owned software vendor that
developed and distributed manufacturing execution systems. The
acquisition of Visiprise was another step in our strategy of
helping manufacturing organizations close the gap between
operational planning and production execution.
Other than the Business Objects acquisition, the acquisitions
made in 2008 were immaterial to us individually and in the
aggregate. For further information, see Note 4 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
There were no public takeover offers by third parties with
respect to our shares in 2008 or 2007.
43
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND LICENSES
We rely on a combination of the protections provided by
applicable trade secret, copyright, patent, and trademark laws,
license and non-disclosure agreements, and technical measures to
establish and protect our proprietary rights in our products.
For further details on risks related to SAPs intellectual
property rights, see Item 3 Key
Information Risk Factors Other
Operational Risks.
We may be dependent in the aggregate on technology that we
license from third parties that is embedded into our products or
that we resell to our customers. We have licensed and will
continue to license numerous third-party software products that
we incorporate into
and/or
distribute with our existing products. We endeavor to protect
ourselves in the respective agreements by obtaining certain
rights in case such agreements are terminated.
We are a party to certain patent cross-license agreements with
certain third parties.
We are named as a defendant in various legal proceedings for
alleged intellectual property infringements. See Note 24 to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of
these legal proceedings.
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
As of December 31, 2008, SAP AG was the holding company of
187 subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries perform various tasks such as
the distribution of SAPs products and providing SAP
services on a local basis. Our primary research and development
facilities, the overall group strategy and the corporate
administration functions are concentrated at our headquarters in
Walldorf, Germany.
The following table illustrates our most significant
subsidiaries based on revenues as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
Name of Subsidiary
|
|
%
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Function
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Deutschland AG & Co. KG, Walldorf
|
|
100
|
|
Germany
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Rest of Europe/Middle East/Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP (UK) Limited, Feltham
|
|
100
|
|
Great Britain
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP (Schweiz) AG, Biel
|
|
100
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP France S.A., Paris
|
|
100
|
|
France
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP ITALIA SISTEMI, APPLICAZIONI, PRODOTTI IN DATA PROCESSING
S.P.A., Milan
|
|
100
|
|
Italy
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP Nederland B.V.,s-Hertogenbosch
|
|
100
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP CIS, Moscow
|
|
100
|
|
Russia
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square
|
|
100
|
|
USA
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Business Objects Americas
|
|
100
|
|
USA
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP Canada Inc., Toronto
|
|
100
|
|
Canada
|
|
Sales, consulting, training,
and research and development
|
SAP Public Services, Inc., Washington, D.C.
|
|
100
|
|
USA
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
SAP Brasil Ltda.
|
|
100
|
|
Brasil
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP JAPAN Co., Ltd., Tokyo
|
|
100
|
|
Japan
|
|
Sales, consulting training,
and research and
development
|
SAP Australia Pty Limited, Sydney
|
|
100
|
|
Australia
|
|
Sales, consulting and training
|
44
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
Our principal office is located in Walldorf, Germany, where we
own and occupy approximately 420,000 square meters of
office space including our facilities in neighboring St.
Leon-Rot. We also own and lease office space in various other
locations in Germany, totaling approximately 115,000 square
meters, and in 59 other countries worldwide, totaling
approximately 705,000 square meters. The space in most
locations other than our principal office in Germany is leased.
We own certain real properties in Newtown Square and Palo Alto,
United States; Bangalore, India; and a few other locations in
and outside of Germany.
The office space we occupy includes approximately
275,000 square meters in the EMEA region, excluding
Germany, approximately 240,000 square meters in the USA,
and approximately 190,000 square meters in the APJ Region.
The space is being utilized for various corporate functions
including research and development, customer support, sales and
marketing, consulting, training, and administration.
Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements discusses
property, plant, and equipment by geographic region.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees discusses the numbers of our employees by
business area and by geographic region, which may be used to
approximate the productive capacity of our workspace in each
region.
We believe that our facilities are in good operating condition
and adequate for our present usage. We do not have any
significant encumbrances on our properties. We are currently
undertaking construction activities in various locations to
increase our capacity for future expansion of our business. Some
of our significant construction activities are described below,
under the heading Capital Expenditures.
Capital Expenditures
We commenced the construction of a new office building at our
Newtown Square location in the second quarter of 2007, which
will add 850 workspaces and will increase our workspace by
approximately 20,000 square meters. We estimate the total
cost to be about 79 million, of which we had incurred
approximately 55 million as of December 31,
2008. The construction is expected to be completed in May of
2009. We are funding the construction with internally generated
cash flows.
In Germany we closed down our branch in Saarbrücken and
started the consolidation of facilities with the branch in St.
Ingbert. We estimate the total cost of this project to be
approximately 14 million, of which we had paid
approximately 6 million as of December 31, 2008.
We are funding the construction in St. Ingbert with internally
generated cash flows. We expect to complete this project within
the second half of 2010.
In 2008 we began construction of a guesthouse in our Walldorf
location to save future travel costs on visiting SAP employees.
We estimate the total cost of the construction to be
approximately 17 million, of which we had paid
approximately 8 million as of December 31, 2008.
We are funding the construction with internally generated cash
flows. The construction is expected to be completed by the end
of 2009.
In Brazil, we commenced construction for the expansion of the
São Leopoldo office in the fourth quarter of 2007, which
will add 400 workspaces. We estimate the total costs to be about
13 million, of which we had incurred approximately
5 million as of December 31, 2008. We are
funding this project with internally generated cash flows. The
construction at this location is expected to be completed in mid
2009.
Our capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment
amounted to 344 million for 2008 (2007:
342 million; 2006: 316 million). Capital
expenditures in 2008 for property, plant, and equipment remained
constant compared to 2007. The increase from 2006 to 2007 was in
large part due to the construction of new buildings in Walldorf
that were completed in 2007. For a related discussion on
property, plant, and equipment, see Note 17 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
45
Our capital expenditures for intangible assets such as software
licenses, acquired technologies and customer contracts increased
significantly to 1,044 million in 2008 from
238 million in 2007 (2006: 189 million).
Goodwill also increased significantly to
3,547 million in 2008 from 520 million in
2007 (2006: 407 million). The increase from 2007 to
2008 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Business
Objects. The increase from 2006 to 2007 was primarily
attributable to the acquisition of the shares or net assets of
various unrelated companies in 2007. For further details on
acquisitions and related capital expenditures, see Note 4
and Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
For further details regarding capital expenditures by geographic
region, see Note 28 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. Financial Statements.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
OVERVIEW
Our principal sources of revenue are sales of software products
and related services. Software revenue is primarily derived from
software license fees that customers pay to use SAP products. We
provide standard support for a fee based on a fixed percentage
of the license fee paid by the customer and we also offer
optional support services for additional coverage and scope. In
2008 SAP began offering Enterprise Support, which allows
companies to take full advantage of the integration of SAP and
non-SAP solutions, minimize risk, enable the acceleration of
innovation and address solution lifecycle management. Our
professional service revenue consists of consulting, training
and other service revenue; consulting revenue is primarily
derived from the services rendered with respect to
implementation of our software products and training revenue
from customer project teams and end-users, as well as training
third-party consultants with respect to SAP software products.
See Item 4. Information about SAP The SAP
Portfolio for a more detailed description of the products
and services we offer.
Subscription revenues flow from contracts that have both a
software element and a support element. Subscription contracts
typically give our customers the use of current software and the
right to unspecified future products. We charge a fixed monthly
fee for a definite term, which is generally five years. Software
rental revenue flows from software rental contracts, also with
software and support elements but here the customer
receives the use of current products only. Our revenue from
other software-related services includes revenue from our
on-demand offerings, for example the SAP CRM on-demand solution,
any future on-demand revenue from our new midmarket product SAP
Business ByDesign, revenue from hosting contracts that do not
entitle the customer to readily exit the arrangement, and
revenue from software-related revenue-sharing arrangements, for
example our share of revenue from collaboratively developed
products.
We also report revenue from other services within professional
services and other service revenue. This item includes revenue
from non-mandatory hosting services, application management
services (AMS), and sales commission received from
third-parties. Non-mandatory hosting services revenue consists
of revenue from hosting contracts from which the customer can
readily exit if it wishes to run the software on its own systems.
In addition, we present in our Consolidated Statements of Income
the results of discontinued operations. This presentation
results from the wind-down of our TomorrowNow Group
(TN), which consists of TomorrowNow, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, and to cease providing third-party product-support
services. TN is a subsidiary of SAP America, Inc., which is a
wholly owned subsidiary of SAP AG. In our discussion in the
following Operating Results section and the
Segment Discussions section under this Item 5,
revenue and expense figures are for our continuing operations,
unless noted otherwise. The disposal of TN did not have a
significant
46
impact on our results of operations. See Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements for more detail about discontinued
operations.
The following discussion is provided to enable a better
understanding of our operating results for the periods covered,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the key factors and trends that we believe impacted our
performance in 2008;
|
|
|
|
our outlook for 2008 compared to our actual performance;
|
|
|
|
a discussion of our operating results for 2008 compared to 2007
and for 2007 compared to 2006 (including Segment Discussions);
|
|
|
|
the key factors and trends we believe will impact our
performance in 2009; and
|
|
|
|
our outlook for 2009 (including Medium-Term Perspectives).
|
The preceding overview should be read in connection with the
more detailed discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations in this Item 5,
Item 3. Key Information Risk
Factors and Item 18. Financial Statements.
KEY FACTORS
2008 Global Economic
Trends
The international financial crisis pervaded developments in the
global economy during 2008. Its impact on the entire financial
sector and on the real economy was apparent in pressure on the
prices of commodities and of many capital goods, a marked
decline in the price of many securities, corrections
in some places very substantial in real estate
prices, a loss of confidence among market participants, and a
noticeable decline in demand, which the automotive industry felt
especially keenly. In consequence, the economic outlook has
deteriorated significantly, and businesses and consumers have
accordingly adjusted their expectations. Falling commodity
prices at the end of 2008 did nothing to improve overall market
sentiment.
In January 2008, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) projected
that global output, which is the global total value of all goods
and services, would grow 4.2% in 2008; In January 2009, it
revised that projection downward to 3.4%. In an early forecast,
the IMF expected world trade in goods and services to increase
5.6% in 2008; it now believes world trade grew only 4.1% in 2008.
The European Central Bank (ECB) reported worsening economic
trends in the second half of 2008. It observed that global
inflationary pressures relaxed toward the end of the year, but
that the impact of the turmoil on the financial markets was
spreading across the world. The emerging and developing
economies, which in past years had made a strong contribution to
global economic growth, appear also to have been affected by
deteriorating economic conditions. In January 2009, the IMF
estimated that their combined 2008 output growth had declined to
6.3%.
According to the ECB, the economies of the United States and
western Europe became increasingly subdued over the year. In
North America, the sharp downturn in growth was primarily the
result of the steep decline in consumer spending, the continuing
correction of the housing market, and faltering investment in
business plant, equipment, and software. In the economies in the
euro area, 2008 saw ever tighter lending standards for business
and slower growth in lending to consumers, the ECB reported. The
Deutsche Bundesbank reports that in the second half of 2008,
Germany was also significantly affected by the ailing global
economy. Consumer spending and investment behavior were
disrupted, which was reflected in a marked rise in the savings
ratio toward the end of 2008.
Similarly, the economic situation in Japan was made worse in the
second half of 2008 by sluggish domestic demand and a continuing
decline in export activity, according to the ECB. Credit
conditions did not tighten as much as in other industrialized
countries. Nonetheless, the ECB assumes the Japanese economy
slowed further
47
in the final quarter of 2008, because the deteriorating
employment situation kept consumer spending in check and because
exports again decreased as a result of the falling demand
overseas for Japanese products.
According to the ECBs analysis, the pace of growth again
slackened appreciably in the emerging and developing economies
in Asia during the third quarter of 2008. Although the global
economic downturn spread and deepened in the second half of
2008, exports from the emerging countries in Asia were generally
not severely affected. Rather, it was declining domestic demand,
held back by evaporating consumer and business confidence that
slowed economic growth.
Year-Over-Year
Output Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008e
|
|
|
2009p
|
|
|
World
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Advanced economies
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
United States
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Euro area
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Germany
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Developing Asia
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
e = Estimate; p = Projection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: IMF, January 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Market in 2008
In the assessment of International Data Corporation (IDC), a
market research firm based in the United States, the effects of
the international financial crisis on the real economy had a
pronounced influence on global demand for IT
especially in the final quarter of 2008. Until as late as the
summer, the global IT market had withstood relatively well the
turmoil of the financial crisis and already receding economic
growth even though that market was beginning to show
signs of reduced vigor. In the first half of the year, IDC also
observed a flattening of the increase in demand for IT in the
emerging economies, trending toward the lower levels of demand
growth in the industrialized countries. While, in IDCs
analysis, demand in some industries, such as financial services,
retail, and construction, remained weak, international IT
spending growth was relatively constant into the third quarter
of 2008. IDC attributes such robust growth in IT spending to the
increasing complexity of the tasks that IT accomplishes for
companies, and on the resultant efficiency gains.
However, as the credit crunch worsened, from mid-September
companies showed much less willingness to invest in IT.
Investment bank Goldman Sachss IT spending indicator
suggested that IT capital expenditure growth was decelerating
significantly, measured over the full year. By the end of 2008,
the perception that economic growth was waning was already
reflected in acutely reduced demand from companies for hardware
and software, IDC observed.
Overall, in IDCs analysis, 2008 was a relatively good year
because the financial crisis did not affect the real economy
until quite late. Year-over-year, worldwide spending on IT,
excluding telecommunications, grew 6.9%. Breaking down 2008
spending growth by segment, IDC estimated that the biggest
increase was achieved in packaged software (9.1%), while the
weakest segment was hardware (4.9% growth). In its geographical
breakdown, IDC estimated that spending grew most strongly in the
AJP region (10.3%) and least strongly in the Americas region
(3.9%).
48
IT Spending
Percentage Change Since Previous Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008e
|
|
|
2009p
|
|
|
World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT market
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Hardware
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
Packaged software
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Application software
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Services
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Americas region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT market
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Packaged software
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Application software
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Services
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
EMEA region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT market
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Packaged software
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Application software
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Services
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
APJ region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IT market
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Packaged Software
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Application software
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Services
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
e = Estimate; p = Projection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: IDC Black Book Q4, February 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTLOOK 2008
SAP Performance
Against our Outlook for 2008
We expressed our 2008 operating income-related internal
management goals and published outlook in non-GAAP terms. For
this reason, in the following section we discuss performance
against our outlook exclusively and expressly in terms of
non-GAAP numbers. The subsequent discussion in this
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects Operating Results is in terms of
U.S. GAAP measures, except where otherwise noted.
Outlook for 2008
At the beginning of 2008, we provided an outlook of increasing
non-GAAP software and software-related service revenue (2007:
7,427 million) in a range between 24% and 27% on a
constant currency basis. We defined the measure as excluding a
nonrecurring deferred support revenue write-down of
approximately 180 million from the acquisition of
Business Objects. We expected SAPs business, excluding the
contribution from Business Objects, to contribute 12 to
14 percentage points to this growth. In July 2008, we also
announced that in view of our successful first-half year
operations, we expected non-GAAP software and software-related
service revenue growth to reach the upper end of the range that
we had announced earlier. In October 2008 as a result of the
49
deteriorating global economic conditions, we decided we could no
longer specifically forecast our non-GAAP at constant currency
software and software-related service revenue growth for 2008.
See below for our outlook given in October 2008.
At the beginning of 2008, we also projected that our
constant-currency non-GAAP operating margin, which excludes a
nonrecurring deferred support revenue write-down from the
acquisition of Business Objects and acquisition-related charges,
would be in a range between 27.5% and 28.0%. Non-GAAP operating
margin is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of non-GAAP
operating income at constant currency to non-GAAP total revenue
at constant currency. The non-GAAP operating margin outlook that
we announced at the beginning of 2008 included accelerated
investments of 175 to 225 million (2007:
125 million) in building a business around the new
SAP Business ByDesign solution to address new, untapped segments
in the mid-market. In April of 2008, we modified the rollout
strategy for the SAP Business ByDesign solution to enable a more
focused and controlled
ramp-up
process. We announced that the accelerated investment in SAP
Business ByDesign in 2008 would be reduced by approximately
100 million in view of the modified rollout strategy.
We expected this would reinforce the non-GAAP operating margin
improvement and lead to an operating margin in the range between
28.5% and 29.0%. In July 2008, we announced that we expected the
full-year non-GAAP operating margin to be at the upper end of
the range reinforced in April 2008. In October 2008 we modified
our constant currency non-GAAP operating margin outlook further
as the impact of the global economic crisis became more
apparent. See below for our outlook given in October 2008.
In October, we adjusted our outlook for full-year 2008 non-GAAP
software and software-related service revenues and non-GAAP
operating margin. In light of the uncertain economic and
business environment, in October 2008 we ceased providing an
outlook for full-year 2008 non-GAAP software and
software-related service revenues and modified our outlook for
non-GAAP operating margin. At that time we gave the following
outlook for full-year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
With recent cost-savings initiatives in place, the Company
expects full-year 2008 non-GAAP operating margin, which excludes
a nonrecurring deferred support revenue write-down of
180 million from the acquisition of Business Objects
and acquisition-related charges, to be around 28% at constant
currencies if we can increase non-GAAP software and
software-related service revenues, excluding a nonrecurring
deferred support revenue write-down from the acquisition of
Business Objects, in a range between 20% and 22% at constant
currencies for the full year 2008. We believe that in the fourth
quarter of 2008 we can save some 200 million compared
to our originally forecasted costs. To this end we will stop all
recruitment, considerably reduce spending on externally provided
services, and make cuts in travel and other variable expenditure
for the rest of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to project an effective tax rate of 31.0% to 31.5%
(based on U.S. GAAP income from continuing operations) for
2008.
|
|
|
|
In our previous outlook (given in July 2008) we expected to
hire 3,500 employees in 2008 (excluding additions from
acquisitions). To date we have hired 1,500 new employees (given
in October 2008; excluding new hires from acquisitions). Based
on our revised outlook this amount should not significantly
change through the end of the year.
|
|
|
|
We will continue in 2008 with our strategy of buying back shares
in order to give back liquidity to our shareholders. We already
bought back shares totaling 486.8 million as of
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
The investments in fixed assets (excluding acquisitions) planned
for 2008 mainly comprise the completion of office buildings at
several locations which can be fully financed with operating
cash flow. Based on our cost saving programs we reduced the
investments which were planned for the fourth quarter. Our
financial position shall be further strengthened as a result.
|
|
|
|
This outlook is based among others on the presented assumptions
regarding the global financial crisis which emerged in the
second half of September. The global financial crisis resulted
in a
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
clear and until this time unexpected change in the buying
behavior of our customers. However, the outlook is also based on
the assumption that the buying behavior will follow our normal
seasonality of revenues; we expect the fourth quarter
contributing the highest revenues of the year 2008.
|
A reconciliation from our Non-GAAP financial measures to our
U.S. GAAP financial measures is provided below. These
non-GAAP measures reconcile to the nearest U.S. GAAP
equivalents as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Objects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on the
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Acquisition-
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
Non-GAAP
|
|
|
Measure at
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Under U.S.
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Constant
|
|
2008
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
millions, except operating margin
|
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,623
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
8,919
|
|
Total
revenue(1)
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
Operating
income(1)
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
24.6%
|
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
|
28.2%
|
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
28.4%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These financial measures are the
numerator or the denominator in the calculation of our non-GAAP
operating margin and the comparable U.S. GAAP operating margin,
and are included in this table for the convenience of the reader.
|
2008
Non-GAAP Software and Software-Related Service
Revenue Early 2008 Outlook Compared to Actual
Performance
On a constant currency basis over the full year, our non-GAAP
software and software-related service revenue grew 20% (16%
without adjustment for currency effects) to
8,919 million (2007: 7,427 million), which
was below the revenue outlook we set at the beginning of the
year. We did not meet our early 2008 revenue outlook due to the
global economic crisis that emerged in the second half of 2008,
which caused the demand for our software products to decrease
steeply, particularly in the fourth quarter of 2008, as many
customers declined to make investment decisions. Although demand
for original SAP products fell more severely than the products
of Business Objects, SAPs business without the Business
Objects results contributed 6 percentage points to non-GAAP
software and software-related service revenue growth on a
constant currency basis due primarily to the successes in the
first half of the year. For the fifth year in succession,
including the results of Business Objects, we achieved
double-digit percentage growth in full-year non-GAAP software
and software-related service revenue on a constant currency
basis.
2008
Non-GAAP Operating Margin Outlook Compared to
Actual Performance
We achieved a non-GAAP operating margin of 28.4% on a constant
currency basis, meeting the outlook we provided at the beginning
of the year (27.5% to 28%) and the outlook provided in October
2008 (28.0%), but failing to meet the outlook provided in April
2008 and as revised in July 2008. This represented a
1.1 percentage-point improvement over the previous
years corresponding 27.3% non-GAAP operating margin,
despite the difficult economic conditions. In addition, we met
the non-GAAP at constant currency operating margin outlook of
28% we defined in October 2008, even though the 20%
year-over-year growth in our non-GAAP software and
software-related service revenue that we achieved on a constant
currency basis was at the lower end of the assumed range. We
realized this success by implementing comprehensive cost
savings, which included a stop on all recruitment and a
significant reduction of spending on external service providers,
business travel and other variable costs. Compared to the
original forecast, we saved more than 200 million in
the final quarter of 2008 with these measures, which were an
immediate response to the deteriorating economic conditions.
51
OPERATING RESULTS
Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
As a result of our acquisition of Business Objects in January
2008, our numbers for 2008 and 2007 are not fully comparable.
2008 compared with 2007. Total revenue increased
from 10,242 million in 2007 to
11,565 million in 2008, representing an increase of
1,323 million or 13%. The revenue growth reflects a
17% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects. This increase is mainly related
to the strong performance in software and software-related
service revenue, which grew by 1,030 million or 14%
compared to 2007. A significant portion of this growth was due
the acquisition of Business Objects. In 2008, software and
software-related service revenue represented 73% of our total
revenue, which was flat compared to 2007. Professional services
and other service revenue contributed 295 million to
the overall growth in 2008. This represents an increase of 11%
compared to 2007. Professional services and other service
revenue accounted for 26% of our total revenue compared to 27%
in 2007.
The average exchange rate for the U.S. dollar in 2008 was
$1.47 per 1.00, compared to $1.38 per 1.00 in 2007.
The rate evolved as follows for the period-end Noon Buying Rate
expressed as dollars per 1.00.
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Period-End
|
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
1.4603
|
|
March 2008
|
|
|
1.5805
|
|
June 2008
|
|
|
1.5748
|
|
September 2008
|
|
|
1.4081
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
1.3919
|
|
Ultimately the strength of the euro over the year reduced the
euro value of revenue generated in other currencies. Foreign
currency translation effects from the strengthening value of the
euro during the year negatively impacted our total revenue by 4%
in 2008.
2007 compared with 2006. Total revenue increased
from 9,393 million in 2006 to
10,242 million in 2007, representing an increase of
849 million or 9%. The revenue growth reflects a 13%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease
from currency effects. This increase is mainly related to the
strong increase in software and software-related service
revenue, which grew by 831 million or 13% compared to
2006. The revenue growth reflects a 17% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects. In
2007, software and software-related service revenue represented
73% of our total revenue, which is an increase of
3 percentage points compared to 2006, in line with our
goals. Professional services and other service revenue
contributed 16 million to the overall growth in 2007.
This represents an increase of 4% compared to 2006 from changes
in volumes and prices and 3% decrease from currency effects.
The average exchange rate for the U.S. dollar in 2007 was
$1.38 per 1.00, compared to $1.27 per 1.00 in 2006.
The rate evolved as follows for the period-end Noon Buying Rate
expressed as dollars per 1.00.
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Period-End
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
1.3197
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
1.3374
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
1.3520
|
|
September 2007
|
|
|
1.4219
|
|
December 2007
|
|
|
1.4603
|
|
52
Ultimately the strength of the euro over the year reduced the
euro value of revenue generated in other currencies. Foreign
currency translation effects from the strengthening value of the
euro during the year negatively impacted our total consolidated
revenue by 4% in 2007.
Software and
software-related service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
7,427
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Software revenue represents fees earned from the sale or license
of software to customers. Support revenue represents fees earned
from providing customers with technical support services and
unspecified software upgrades, updates and enhancements.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
represents fees earned from subscriptions, software rentals, and
other types of software-related service contracts.
2008 compared with 2007. Software and
software-related service revenue increased from
7,427 million in 2007 to 8,457 million in
2008, representing an increase of 1,030 million or
14%. A significant portion of this growth was due the
acquisition of Business Objects. The revenue growth reflects an
18% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects.
Software revenue rose from 3,407 million in 2007 to
3,606 million in 2008, accounting for an increase of
199 million, or 6%. The software revenue growth
consists of a 10% increase from changes in volumes and prices
and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
The strong performance in software and software-related service
revenue for the full year 2008 is the result of well balanced
growth in all regions. Compared to 2007 the EMEA region grew by
15%. This growth represents an 18% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 3% decrease from currency effects. The
Americas region grew by 9%, which represents a 16% increase from
changes in volumes and prices and a 7% decrease from currency
effects and the region Asia Pacific Japan region by grew 21%,
which represents a 23% increase from changes in volumes and
prices and a 2% decrease from currency effects.
The extension of our established product portfolio, SAP Business
Suite and our platform-related products based on SAP NetWeaver,
especially towards the business user solutions, led to an
overall software revenue growth rate of 6%. The software revenue
growth reflects a 10% increase from increased volumes and prices
and a 4% decrease from currency effects. In 2008, we continued
to derive software revenue from our strong customer base.
Nevertheless, the number of software contracts coming from new
customers remained stable at 31%. Based on the order entry
value, the new customer share decreased from 21% in 2007 to 13%
in 2008 influenced fundamentally by lower deal sizes in the
extended business user area.
The SAP NetWeaver-related revenue decreased from
997 million in 2007 to 942 million in
2008, representing a decrease of 55 million or 6%.
The portion relating specifically to the underlying SAP
NetWeaver stand-alone revenue increased by 55 million
or 17% to 384 million in 2008 compared to
329 million in 2007. The decrease was mainly due to
the global economic crisis that emerged during the second half
of 2008 since we recorded a 31% increase during the first half
of 2008.
Our stable customer base and the continued sale of software to
existing and new customers throughout 2008 resulted in an
increase in support revenue from 3,838 million in
2007 to 4,593 million in 2008, representing an
increase of 755 million or 20%. The support revenue
growth reflects a 23% increase from changes in volumes and
prices and a 3% decrease from currency effects. The largest
contributor to the 2008
53
increase in support revenue based on volume was the Americas
region where our support revenue increased by 27%.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 76 million or 42% to
258 million compared to 182 million in
2007. The growth in revenue reflects a 43% increase from volumes
and prices and 1% decrease from currency effects. The increase
was primarily due to the settlement of new major subscription
contracts.
2007 compared with 2006. Software and
software-related service revenue increased from
6,596 million in 2006 to 7,427 million in
2007, representing an increase of 831 million or 13%
A significant portion of this growth was due the acquisition of
Business Objects. This growth represents a 17% increase from
changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency
effects.
Software revenue increased from 3,003 million in 2006
to 3,407 million in 2007, representing an increase of
404 million, or 13%. This growth represents a 18%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 5% decrease
from currency effects. The currency effects were impacted by the
stronger value of the euro compared to other currencies. This
strong performance is the result of well balanced growth in all
regions. Compared to 2006 the EMEA region grew by 14%. This
growth represents a 15% increase from changes in volumes and
prices and a 1% decrease from currency effects. The Americas
region grew by 8%, which represents a 16% increase from changes
in volumes and prices and a 8% decrease from currency effects
and the Asia Pacific Japan region grew by 28%, which represents
a 32% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects.
In addition to the further increased licensing of our software
solution SAP Business Suite and the platform related products
utilizing our SAP NetWeaver platform technology, the growth in
software revenue was also driven by increased sales of our
business user solutions. In 2007 we continued to derive software
revenue from our existing customer base. In both 2007 and 2006,
approximately 31% of the number of new contracts came from new
customers, with the remaining 69% coming from our installed
customer base. Based on the value of orders received, the new
customer share increased from 19% in 2006 to 21% in 2007.
The SAP NetWeaver-related revenue increased from
754 million in 2006 to 997 million in
2007, representing an increase of 243 million or 32%.
The underlying SAP NetWeaver stand-alone revenue increased by
160 million or 95% to 329 million in 2007
compared to 169 million in 2006.
Thanks to our stable installed customer base and the continued
sale of software to existing and new customers throughout 2007,
support revenue increased from 3,464 million in 2006
to 3,838 million in 2007, representing an increase of
374 million or 11%. The support revenue growth
reflects a 15% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a
4% decrease from currency effects. The largest contributor to
the 2007 increase in support revenue based on volume was again
the EMEA region where the support revenue increased by
219 million or 11%.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 53 million or 41% to
182 million compared to 129 million in
2006.
Professional
services and other service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
54
2008 compared with 2007. Professional services and
other service revenue increased from 2,744 million in
2007 to 3,039 million in 2008, representing an
increase of 295 million or 11%. This revenue growth
reflects a 15% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a
4% decrease from currency effects.
Consulting revenue increased from 2,221 million in
2007 to 2,498 million in 2008, representing an
increase of 12%. The consulting revenue growth reflects a 17%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 5% decrease
from currency effects. In 2008, consulting contributed strongly
to the revenue growth in professional services and other service
revenue representing a pay off for past headcount investments in
the consulting area. Consulting revenue as a percentage of total
revenue remained quite stable at 22% in 2008, contributing to
SAPs total revenue double-digit growth rate.
Training revenue increased from 410 million in 2007
to 434 million in 2008, representing an increase of
6%. The training revenue growth reflects a 10% increase from
changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency
effects. Strong contribution to the growth in training revenue
was achieved by higher demand for
E-Learning
and on-site
customer training. The training business also benefited from
growth in the certification area.
Other service revenue decreased from 113 million in
2007 to 107 million in 2008, representing a decrease
of 5%. The other service revenue decline reflects a 2% decrease
from changes in volumes and prices and a 3% decrease from
currency effects. Other service revenue mainly consists of
revenue generated by the SAP Managed Services organization,
which operates, manages and maintains SAP solutions.
2007 compared with 2006. Professional services and
other service revenue increased slightly from
2,728 million in 2006 to 2,744 million in
2007, representing an increase of 16 million or 1%.
This revenue growth reflects a 4% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 3% decrease from currency effects.
Consulting revenue decreased from 2,249 million in
2006 to 2,221 million in 2007, representing a
decrease of 1%. The consulting revenue growth reflects a 2%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 3% decrease
from currency effects. In 2007, consulting headcount grew by
12%; however, it required time to ramp up these new resources to
a fully productive status. This effect, coupled with negative
currency effects, contributed to the slight decline in
consulting revenue.
Consulting revenue as a percentage of total revenue decreased
from 24% in 2006 to 22% in 2007, caused by the continued growth
of software and software-related services revenue, and the
slight decline of consulting revenue year over year.
Training revenue increased from 383 million in 2006
to 410 million in 2007 or 7%. The growth reflects an
11% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4%
decrease from currency effects. While traditional classroom
training only grew marginally, most of the growth in training
revenue was achieved in the
E-Learning
area. The training business also benefited from growth in the
certification area.
Other service revenue increased from 96 million in
2006 to 113 million in 2007 or 18%. The other service
revenue growth reflects a 23% increase from changes in volumes
and prices and a 5% decrease from currency effects. Other
service revenue mainly consists of revenue generated by the SAP
Managed Services organization, which operates, manages and
maintains SAP solutions. Most of the growth of SAP Managed
Services revenue came from the EMEA region.
55
Total Operating
Expenses and Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8,725
|
|
|
|
7,510
|
|
|
|
6,815
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Operating margin (Operating income as a percentage of total
revenue)
|
|
|
24.6%
|
|
|
|
26.7%
|
|
|
|
27.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of our acquisition of Business Objects in January
2008, our numbers for 2008 and 2007 are not fully comparable.
2008 compared with 2007. Despite our response to
the effects of the financial and economic crisis by introducing
cost-saving measures, which resulted in a saving of more than
200 million in the final quarter of 2008, our total
operating expenses for 2008 increased to
8,725 million compared to 7,510 million in
2007 representing an increase of 1,215 million or
16%. As described below the main driver for this increase was
the acquisition of Business Objects.
For a more detailed analysis of the individual operating expense
line items see the Operating Expenses section
following this section. The increase in total operating expenses
was mainly driven by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008 we increased our personnel expenses by
705 million or 17% to 4,879 million, which
is the result of the overall headcount increase in 2008 of 7,675
FTE, including acquisitions, or 17% to 51,536 FTE as of
December 31, 2008. Of this 17% Business Objects contributed
14 percentage points or 6,224 FTE.
|
|
|
|
In addition to the Business Objects acquisition the 2008 cost of
software and software-related services increased due to payments
for additional third-party licenses, the effects of license
disputes, and further reinforcement of our support resources in
the first half of the year.
|
|
|
|
The increase in our expenses for sales and marketing was steeper
than the rise in our total revenue. This was principally due to
our investment in expanding the field organization for our SAP
BusinessObjects solutions.
|
|
|
|
The modest increase in cost of professional services and other
services, research and development and general and
administration expense could for the most part be attributed to
expenses we incurred in several areas in connection with the
acquisition of Business Objects.
|
Increased operating expenses in 2008 coupled with the lower than
expected revenue result due to the deteriorating economic
conditions in the second half 2008, resulted in a decrease in
operating income from 6% in 2007 to 4% in 2008.
2007 compared with 2006. At the beginning of the
2007, we explained in our outlook that we intended to invest
about 300 million to 400 million over a
period of eight quarters starting in early 2007 to build up a
business around SAP Business ByDesign. Depending on when we
actually made these investments, in 2007 we expected to reinvest
the equivalent of about one to two operating margin percentage
points in preparing for additional future growth opportunities.
Therefore, we assumed our 2007 operating margin to be in the
range 26.0% to 27.0%. In line with our outlook, the additional
investment we had announced, which amounted to
125 million, reduced our operating margin by
1.2 percentage points. We spent the money on accelerated
investments in enhancing IT infrastructure, building our sales
and channel capability, and extending our marketing activity.
Total operating expenses for 2007 were 7,510 million
compared to 6,815 million representing an increase of
695 million or 10%.
56
The increase in total operating expenses was mainly driven by
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In 2007 we increased our personnel expenses by
356 million or 9% to 4,174 million, which
is the result of the overall headcount increase in 2007 of 4,663
FTE or 12% to 43,861 FTE as of December 31, 2007. We
continued to keep a tight control on personnel expenses due to
minimal fixed salary increases as well as by adding additional
headcount primarily in the major emerging markets with modest
salary levels. In total, 35% of the headcount increase in 2007
was realized in India, China and Bulgaria. The share of
employees in these three countries increased from 14% in 2006 to
16% as of December 31, 2007. Personnel expenses as
percentage of total operating expenses remained stable at 56%.
|
|
|
|
As a result of the strong increase in software and
software-related service revenue, cost of purchased licenses
(e.g. databases) increased in 2007 by 27%.
|
|
|
|
The incremental headcount and the increase in business activity
in 2007 resulted in 54 million or 13% higher travel
expenses compared to 2006.
|
|
|
|
Our accelerated investments in connection with SAP Business
ByDesign.
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of software and
software-related services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
As a percentage of software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services consists
primarily of:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer support costs which include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Enterprise Support (e.g. End-to-end Solution Operations,
Global support backbone, 7x 24 Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Custom
Code Support, Support for Enhancement Packs, Pro-active Remote
Service)
|
|
|
|
Support for Large Enterprises (LE)
|
|
|
|
Standard support (e.g. 24x7 customer problem resolution, remote
service delivery)
|
|
|
|
SAP Premium Support (Increased value on standard services)
|
|
|
|
Optimized implementation and ongoing management of End-to-end
Solution Operations (costs and risks control by managing
customers applications end-to-end)
|
|
|
|
SAP MaxAttention Support (comprehensive support tailored to
customer needs)
|
|
|
|
SAP Safeguarding (Reduced implementation or upgrade risk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of developing custom solutions that address
customers unique business requirements.
|
|
|
|
License fees and commissions paid to third parties for databases
and the other complementary third-party products sublicensed by
us to customers.
|
2008 compared with 2007. The cost of software and
software-related services increased from
1,310 million in 2007 to 1,646 million in
2008, or by 26%, which was mainly due the acquisition of
Business Objects, but also due to the expansion of support
resources, the 32 million effects of license disputes and
increased expenses for third-party license fees. As a percentage
of software and software-related service revenue, cost of
software and software-related services increased from 18% in
2007 to 19% in 2008.
57
Overall, the workforce in this area increased from 5,831 FTEs in
2007 to 6,458 FTEs in 2008, representing an increase of 11%. The
support organization has continued its efforts to improve the
efficiency of our processes by moving into low-cost locations
(Bulgaria, China and India). Approximately 24% of our global
support resources were based in the low-cost locations at the
end of 2008, which is an increase of 2 percentage points
compared to 2007.
2007 compared with 2006. The cost of software and
software-related services increased from
1,091 million in 2006 to 1,310 million in
2007, or by 20%, mainly due to the expansion of support
resources and increased expenses for third-party license fees.
As a percentage of software and software-related service
revenue, cost of software and software-related services
increased from 17% in 2006 to 18% in 2007. The decline of the
software and software-related services margin was influenced in
2007 by 0.5 percentage points from our accelerated
investments in SAP Business ByDesign.
Overall, the workforce in this area increased from 5,243 FTEs in
2006 to 5,831 FTEs in 2007, representing an increase of 11%. The
support organization has continued its efforts to improve the
efficiency of our processes by moving into low-cost locations
(Bulgaria, China and India). Twenty-two percent of the support
resources were based in the low-cost locations at the end of
2007, which is an increase of 2 percentage points compared
to 2006.
Cost of professional
services and other services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and other service
revenue
|
|
|
76%
|
|
|
|
76%
|
|
|
|
76%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and other services consists
primarily of consulting and training personnel expenses as well
as expenses for third-party consulting and training resources.
2008 compared with 2007. Cost of professional
services and other services rose from 2,091 million
in 2007 to 2,296 million in 2008, or 10%. As a
percentage of professional services and other services revenue,
cost of professional services and other service revenue remained
steady at 76%. The lower cost increase compared to a slightly
higher revenue growth led to a positive professional services
and other services margin development in 2008, although that
improvement was mainly offset by increased costs resulting from
our focused efforts to rapidly integrate the Business Objects
professional services activities into our service portfolio.
These increased costs negatively influenced our professional
services and other services margin by 1.4 percentage points.
The increase in cost of professional services and other services
was also due to increased personnel expenses resulting from the
integration of Business Objects employees.
2007 compared with 2006. Cost of services
increased from 2,073 million in 2006 to
2,091 million in 2007, or 1%. As a percentage of
service revenue, cost of services remained the same at 76% in
both 2007 and 2006. The professional services and other services
margin was influenced in 2007 by 0.5 percentage points from
our accelerated investments in SAP Business ByDesign.
The slight increase in cost of professional services and other
services was mainly driven by increased personnel expenses due
to the hiring of new employees in consulting.
58
Research and
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our research and development (R&D) expenses consist
primarily of:
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses related to our R&D employees;
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred for independent contractors retained by us to
assist in our R&D activities; and
|
|
|
|
Amortization of computer hardware and software used in our
R&D activities.
|
2008 compared with 2007. R&D expenses in 2008
increased by 12% to 1,631 million compared to
1,458 million in 2007. As a percentage of total
revenue, research and development expenses were 14% in 2008,
which is consistent with 2007.
Our R&D expenses in 2008 increased mainly due to
incremental headcount. The number of development employees
increased by 2,596 FTE or 20% to 15,547 FTE as of
December 31, 2008, primarily due to the Business Objects
acquisition.
2007 compared with 2006. R&D expenses in 2007
increased by 9% to 1,458 million compared to
1,335 million in 2006. As a percentage of total
revenue, R&D expenses were 14% in 2007, which is flat
compared to 2006. Around 0.3 percentage points of the 14%
increase were related to our accelerated investments in SAP
Business ByDesign.
R&D expenses were mainly impacted by incremental headcount.
The number of development employees increased by 1,150 FTE or
10% to 12,951 FTE as of December 31, 2007. The R&D
organization has continued to build up development resources
primarily in locations with modest salary levels, and 66% of the
research and development headcount increase in 2007 was realized
in India, China and Bulgaria. The share of development headcount
based in these three locations increased in 2007 by
3 percentage points to 28%.
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 compared with 2007. Sales and marketing
expenses increased from 2,162 million in 2007 to
2,540 million in 2008 or 17%. As a percentage of
total revenue, sales and marketing expenses rose slightly from
21% in 2007 to 22% in 2008. The cost increase resulted primarily
from the 2,419 FTE or 29% additional headcount adding up to
10,701 FTE. Of these, 2,184 FTE were integrated into our
organization as a result of the acquisition of Business Objects.
2007 compared with 2006. Sales and marketing
expenses increased from 1,908 million in 2006 to
2,162 million in 2007 or 13%. As a percentage of
total revenue, sales and marketing expenses increased slightly
from 20% in 2006 to 21% in 2007. The increase resulted primarily
from the 1,232 FTE incremental headcount. In addition, around
0.4 percentage points of the 13% increase were related to
our accelerated investments in the new business model for SAP
Business ByDesign.
59
Overall employees in sales and marketing increased by 1,232 FTE
or 17% to 8,282 FTE in 2007. This growth in 2007 was mainly
driven by the sales area while marketing headcount remained
almost flat. Around 43% of the sales headcount was hired in the
Americas region.
General and
Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 compared with 2007. General and
administration (G&A) expenses increased from
506 million in 2007 to 623 million in
2008. This represents an increase of 23%. This increase was
driven by increased personnel expenses and other headcount
related costs mainly due to the acquisition of Business Objects.
As a percentage of total revenue, G&A expenses remained
flat from 2007 at 5%.
The number of G&A employees increased by 447 FTE or 16% to
3,244 FTE in 2008. As in the prior year, we continued to expand
our shared service centers in all regions to support efficient
growth in this area.
2007 compared with 2006. G&A expenses
increased from 464 million in 2006 to
506 million in 2007. This represents an increase of
9%. This increase was driven by increased personnel expenses and
other headcount related costs due to the incremental headcount.
As a percentage of total revenue, G&A expenses remained at
5% as they were in 2006.
The number of G&A employees increased by 325 FTE or 13% to
2,797 FTE in 2007. We continued to expand our shared service
centers in all regions to support efficient growth in this area.
Financial
Income/Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income/expense, net
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)%
|
|
|
2%
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income/expense, net is comprised primarily of interest
income/expense, net, income/(losses) from equity method
investments, and gains/(losses) on sales of equity securities.
2008 compared with 2007. In 2008, we incurred
significantly higher interest costs than in 2007 due to an
additional acquisition-related bank loan that was taken out in
connection with the Business Objects acquisition. Our interest
income/expense, net declined by approximately 138% in 2008,
resulting in a net interest expense of 51 million.
(2007: 135 million net interest income).
Consequently, our financial income/expense, net decreased from a
net financial income of 124 million in 2007 to a net
financial expense of 62 million in 2008.
2007 compared with 2006. In 2007, our net
interest income rose 13% to 135 million (2006:
120 million), reflecting higher rates of interest.
Impairment charges on minority investments had a minimal
negative effect on financial income/expense, net. The hedging of
stock appreciation rights (STARs) had no effect on financial
income in 2007 (2006: 7 million unrealized gain). In
the previous year, the fair value of instruments acquired to
hedge anticipated STAR exposures increased before the
instruments were designated as hedging the exposure of STARs
granted, and the associated revaluation led to the unrealized
gain. In 2007, we did not acquire instruments to hedge the
anticipated exposure from STARs granted in 2007.
60
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
14%
|
|
As a percentage of Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 compared with 2007. Our income taxes
decreased by 10% in 2008 in comparison to 2007 and our effective
tax rate decreased in 2008 to 30.0% from the previous
years 32.2%. The decrease in our effective tax rate and
the corresponding income tax expense in 2008 was the result of a
reduction in the rate of corporation tax in Germany from 25% to
15%, effective January 1, 2008, and also a reduction in the
rate of trade tax under the German business taxation reform. The
decrease can also be attributed to the decline in income before
income taxes, which decreased by 4%. The decrease in income
before income taxes was mainly due to the reduction in financial
income/expense, net and the decrease in other non-operating
income/expense, net, which were subject to material negative
currency effects. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. Financial Statements,
for further details on income taxes.
2007 compared with 2006. Despite the positive
effect of tax-free or low-tax investment in equities and
financial assets, income tax rose 14% in 2007 while income from
continuing operations before income taxes rose 6%, resulting in
an effective tax rate of 32.2% as compared to 29.9% in 2006. Our
2006 effective tax rate was unusually low due to effects of the
conclusion of tax audits.
SEGMENT DISCUSSIONS
Currently we have three reportable operating segments: product,
consulting and training. Total revenue figures for each of our
operating segments differ from the revenue figures classified in
our consolidated statements of income because for segment
reporting purposes, revenue is generally allocated to the
segment that is responsible for the related transactions,
regardless of the nature of the sales transaction. The segment
contributions reflect only expenses directly attributable to the
segments and do not represent the actual margins for the
operating segments on a U.S. GAAP basis. Costs such as
general and administrative, research and development,
share-based compensation, and certain corporate expenses are not
allocated to the segments and therefore are not reflected in the
segment contribution results. See Note 28 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements for further details on our segments.
In 2008, operating expenses from share-based compensation plans
were 63 million compared to 95 million in
2007 and 99 million in 2006. As noted above, costs
related to share-based compensation programs do not impact
segment results. These expenses are not recorded within
operating segments.
Values in the following table are stated in millions of euros,
except for percentage and percentage point figures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
Product Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
|
14%
|
|
11%
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
(3,655
|
)
|
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
|
|
(2,609
|
)
|
|
19%
|
|
17%
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
4,711
|
|
|
|
4,307
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
9%
|
|
7%
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
56%
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
(2) percentage points
|
|
(3) percentage points
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
Consulting Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
19%
|
|
3%
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
17%
|
|
2%
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
24%
|
|
6%
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
1 percentage
point
|
|
1 percentage point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
Training Segment
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
External revenue
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
6%
|
|
12%
|
Segment expenses
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
5%
|
|
4%
|
Segment contribution
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
8%
|
|
25%
|
Segment profitability
|
|
|
43%
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
1 percentage
point
|
|
4 percentage points
|
Product Segment
The product segment is primarily engaged in marketing and
licensing our software products and providing support for our
software products. Support includes technical support for our
products, assistance in resolving problems, providing user
documentation, unspecified software upgrades, updates and
enhancements. The product segment also performs certain custom
development projects. The product segment includes the sales,
marketing and service and support lines of business.
2008 compared with 2007. Product segment
revenue increased by 14% from 7,369 million in 2007
to 8,366 million in 2008, of which approximately
850 million was due to acquisitions. The increase was
driven by an increased in customer licensing of our software
solutions which in turn contributed to an increase in support
revenue. This growth reflects a 17% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 3% decrease from currency effects.
Approximately 98% of revenue within the product segment is
derived from software and software-related service revenue.
Approximately 2% of revenue within the product segment is
derived from non-software related transactions (e.g.,
professional services, other services, and other revenues)
initiated by employees of the product segment. Software revenue
as part of the total product segment revenue increased by 3%
from 3,269 million in 2007 to
3,356 million in 2008. This growth reflects a 7%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease
from currency effects. Support revenue increased by 23% from
3,737 million in 2007 to 4,596 million in
2008. This growth reflects a 27% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 42% from 181 million in 2007 to
257 million in 2008.
Product segment expenses increased by 19% from
3,062 million in 2007 to 3,655 million in
2008. Expenses from the sales line of business account for about
half of the entire product segment expenses, while expenses from
the marketing line of business account for roughly 20% and
expenses from the service and support line of business account
for roughly 30% of overall product segment expenses. The
increase in product segment expenses results mainly from
headcount growth of roughly 20%, predominantly due to the
acquisition of Business Objects.
Product segment contribution increased by 9% from
4,307 million in 2007 to 4,711 million in
2008, or 56% of total segment revenue compared to 58% of total
segment revenue in 2007.
2007 compared with 2006. Product segment
revenue increased by 11% from 6,643 million in 2006
to 7,369 million in 2007, driven by increased
licensing of our software solutions which then contributed to an
increase in support revenue. This growth reflects a 15% increase
from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from
currency effects. Approximately 98% of revenue within the
product segment wass derived from software and software-related
service revenue, with the remaining 2% derived from professional
services and
62
other service revenue as well as other revenue. Software revenue
as part of the total product segment revenue increased by 12%
from 2,926 million in 2006 to
3,269 million in 2007. This growth reflects a 16%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease
from currency effects. Support revenue increased by 9% from
3,413 million in 2006 to 3,737 million in
2007. This growth reflects a 14% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 5% decrease from currency effects.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
increased by 41% from 129 million in 2006 to
182 million in 2007. This growth reflects a 45%
increase from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease
from currency effects.
Product segment expenses increased by 17% from
2,609 million in 2006 to 3,062 million in
2007. Expenses from the sales line of business accounted for
about half of the entire product segment expenses, while
expenses from the marketing line of business accounted for
roughly one-fourth and expenses from the service and support of
the line of business accounted also for roughly one-fourth of
overall product segment expenses. The increase in product
segment expenses resulted mainly from headcount
growth continued investment in aligning our
operations to more volume business and associated
personnel travel and infrastructure expenses as well as
additional third-party expenses.
Product segment contribution increased by 7% from
4,034 million in 2006 to 4,307 million in
2007, or 58% of total segment revenue compared to 61% of total
segment revenue in 2006.
Consulting Segment
The consulting segment is primarily engaged in the
implementation of our software products.
2008 compared with 2007. Consulting segment
revenue increased by 19% from 2,369 million in 2007
to 2,824 million in 2008. Of this increase
131 million was due to acquisitions. This growth
reflects a 24% increase from changes in volumes and prices and a
5% decrease from currency effects. Consulting segment expenses
increased by 17% from 1,738 million in 2007 to
2,040 million in 2008. Consulting segment
contribution increased by 24% from 631 million in
2007 to 784 million in 2008. The consulting segment
profitability increased by 1 percentage point to 28%.
Geographically EMEA, Americas and APJ have all contributed to
the strong top line growth in the consulting segments revenue
while increased demand has been managed through a 10% increase
in resources, predominantly in the global delivery organization
which accounts for 30% of this headcount increase, and the newly
introduced global hubs which have a focus on strategic solutions
and industries. In addition to this increase in workforce,
customer related third party delivery costs have increased 3% to
support the revenue growth. This growth reflects a 6% growth
from changes in volumes and prices and 3% decrease from currency
effects.
2007 compared with 2006. Consulting segment
revenue increased by 3% from 2,300 million in 2006 to
2,369 million in 2007. This growth reflects a 7% increase
from changes in volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from
currency effects. Consulting segment expenses increased by 2%
from 1,704 million in 2006 to
1,738 million in 2007. Consulting segment
contribution increased by 6% from 596 million in 2006
to 631 million in 2007. The consulting segment
profitability increased by 1 percentage point to 27%.
Geographically, the strongest growth in 2007 came from the
Americas region driven by increased activity in the United
States. The increase in demand has been managed through
increasing the local workforce by 15% and increased use of
SAPs global delivery resources enabling a reduction in
third party delivery costs. The Asia Pacific Japan region also
had strong growth in 2007, with activities in China and India
increasing substantially. This demand has been met through
increased use of global delivery resources, an increase in
headcount together with the use of external resources.
Consulting revenue in the EMEA region grew at a slower rate but
showed significant increase in some areas such as Commonwealth
of Independent States (CIS), the Nordic region, Benelux, Iberia,
southeast European countries, and the Middle East, which all
achieved double digit growth rates.
63
Training Segment
The training segment is primarily engaged in providing
educational services on the use of our software products and
related topics for customers and partners. Training services
include traditional classroom training at SAP training
facilities, customer and partner-specific training and end-user
training, as well as
e-learning.
2008 compared with 2007. Training segment
revenue was 525 million in 2008, which represents an
increase of 6% from 493 million in 2007. This growth
reflects an 11% increase from changes in volumes and prices and
a 5% decrease from currency effects. The primary driver of this
growth was traditional classroom training, where revenue growth
of 16% was achieved. Revenue in the other sectors such as
academy and certification, customer specific training and
e-learning
experienced marginal growth.
Of the 525 million training segment revenue
recognized in 2008, 39 million resulted from
businesses acquired in 2008. Of the core SAP business, before
acquisitions, EMEA and APJ grew 6% and 18% respectively while
the Americas decreased by 18% from 192 million to
158 million. North America shrank by 22%
counteracting the 4% growth shown in Latin America.
Training segment expenses increased from 284 million
in 2007 to 300 million in 2008, or 5% mainly due to
acquisition-related headcount growth.
Training segment contribution increased by 8% from
209 million in 2007 to 225 million in
2008. Training segment margin increased by 1 percentage
point to 43%.
2007 compared with 2006. Training segment
revenue was 493 million in 2007, which represents
another strong increase of 12% from 440 million in
2006. This growth reflects a 16% increase from changes in
volumes and prices and a 4% decrease from currency effects.
While traditional classroom training grew rather marginally,
strong revenue growth was achieved primarily in
e-learning,
academy training, and customer-specific training. Although it
still represents a rather small proportion of 9% of total
training revenue,
e-learning
continues to rise in popularity and grew significantly in 2007
by 181%.
Training segment expenses increased from 273 million
in 2006 to 284 million in 2007, or 4%. The cost of
internal and external resources increased to support the growing
business.
Training segment contribution increased by 25% from
167 million in 2006 to 209 million in
2007. Training segment margin increased by 4 percentage
points to 42%.
OUTLOOK 2009
Future Trends in the
Global Economy for 2009
At the end of 2008, the IMF believed that after massive
revaluations in the second half of the year, the prospects for
global economic development would remain poor as the financial
sector continued to contract. The Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) noted in November that it
was extraordinarily difficult to make reliable predictions about
the economy at the turn of 2008/2009.
As the IMF reported, it was widely held that conditions and
developments on the international financial markets continued to
pose a considerable risk for the global economy. Overvalued
assets on the books of the banks and financial institutions and
falling property prices had materially worsened global economic
conditions, the IMF reported. It noted that companies were
responding by reducing capacity and holding back investment in
capital goods, and that the effects would be felt well into 2009.
According to the IMFs January 2009 projections, in 2009
annual world output growth will decelerate to 0.5% from 3.4% in
2008. Compared to the previous year, the IMF expects significant
decreases in output in the advanced economies (2%) and world
trade (2.8%) in 2009. A sustained recovery will not be possible
until the functionality of the financial sector is restored and
the credit markets are unclogged, the IMF says. At the end of
64
November 2008, the OECD was already forecasting a 0.4%
contraction in the economies of its member states in 2009.
The IMFs January 2009 projections envisage a 1.6%
reduction in U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009. In
January 2009, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office also
expected a contraction in the U.S. economy in 2009, with
inflation-adjusted GDP falling 2.2% and the longest
and deepest recession in the United States since the Second
World War. According to the ECB, restrictive credit terms, the
shortage of work, weaker corporate balance sheets, and uncertain
economic prospects are all discouraging U.S. households and
businesses from spending. The continuing contraction of the
housing market and decreased demand for exports also represent
risks for the prospects of the U.S. economy, it reported.
The IMF, in its January 2009 report, projected a decline in euro
area output of 2.0% in 2009. The ECB also projected at the end
of 2008 that 2009 would see continuing weakness in the global
economy and very subdued demand on the domestic market. Provided
some of the gloom lifts from surrounding economies and some of
the tension is resolved on the financial markets, the ECB
envisages that the second half of 2009 could see the beginnings
of a recovery in the euro area, encouraged by an easing of
commodity prices. However, it believes the downside risks
predominate. Chief among these are that the turbulence on the
financial markets may have a greater impact on the real economy
than previously foreseen and that global macroeconomic
imbalances may stoke protectionism and other uncontrollable
phenomena.
In its January 2009 report the IMF forecast that, like the euro
area as a whole, Germany would experience significant economic
decline in 2009, with GDP contracting 2.5%. The German central
bank, the Deutsche Bundesbank, anticipated at the end of 2008
that early 2009 would see a considerable decrease in activity in
the real economy in Germany. It noted that bailout measures
instigated by governments in many countries represented a broad
base on which control over the global crisis of confidence might
be asserted, but that for the rest of 2009 the burdens on the
economy would be heavy. The Deutsche Bundesbank did not believe
the German economy would regain momentum until a revival in the
global economy, expected in 2010.
Japan will also experience significant decline in 2009, with GDP
contracting 2.6%, according to the January 2009 forecast
published by the IMF. According to the ECB, the beginning of the
year would be marked by slow consumer spending and weak export
demand. In the countries in Asia with developing and emerging
economies, according to the ECB growth would decline further in
2009 owing to the spreading global economic downturn, tight
finance, the weak real estate market, and the delayed effects of
earlier restrictive measures.
IT Market: Outlook
for 2009
The gloomy prospects for the development of the global economy
will continue to hamper demand for IT worldwide, according to
research published at the beginning of 2009 by U.S. market
research firm IDC. It believes businesses demand for IT
will grow much more slowly. The influence of the wider economy
will be stronger than usual and will only partly be offset by IT
industry factors. UBS, a financial services company, also points
to the close connection between economic growth and IT industry
growth, calculating a historical correlation of 0.71 between
global output growth and global IT spending growth.
IDCs expectations for the growth of the IT market reflect
deepening pessimism: In the summer of 2008, IDC was still
expecting 5.9% growth in global IT spending in 2009, by February
2009 it had revised this prediction to 0.5%. It foresees the
most significant decline in demand in the hardware segment. In
February 2009, it projected hardware spending would decrease
3.6%. In the summer of 2008, IDC was expecting 6.2% growth in
application software spending in 2009; by February 2009 it had
revised this projection to 2.7%. In both the packaged software
and the IT services segments, in February 2009 IDC projected
3.4% spending growth in 2009. In January 2009, Forrester
Research, another major market research firm in the United
States, predicted global IT spending would decline 3% in
U.S. dollar terms in 2009, after seven years of continuous
growth. The reasons it gives for this forecast are the impending
recession in the United States, and currency effects. Like IDC,
Forrester
65
also believes software will be the segment to perform best in
the global IT market, with spending virtually unchanged.
IDC expects the turbulence on the financial markets to have a
greater impact on the emerging markets, which have hitherto seen
relatively strong growth in this sector. Notably, this would
affect the economies of eastern Europe, including Russia, where
the global shortage of credit and tighter lending standards
would particularly impact companies IT spending. In the
EMEA region, it projects that 2009 overall IT spending will be
unchanged (0.0%) since the previous year, with growth in the
services segment being the highlight at 2.5%. It expects a
modest increase in demand for IT in 2009 in the Americas region:
Here it predicts overall IT sales will rise 0.6%, led by
packaged software spending and services spending increases of
3.9% and 3.5% respectively. In February 2009, IDC said it
expected IT demand to hold up best in the APJ region. It
believes spending will grow 1.3% there overall in 2009, helped
by increases of 5.4% in services sales and 5.2% in packaged
software sales.
In its discussion of future trends, IDC identifies several
factors that could have a positive effect in the IT industry.
For example, it suggests that convergence could buoy IT demand:
convergence of the telephone network and the Internet, of IT and
communications technologies, and of storage, routing, and
processing in data centers. Convergence may drive new
competitive dynamics and offer new applications and functions to
customers. IDC reports that the resulting stricter legal and
regulatory compliance demands should help sales of sophisticated
GRC software, both for initial deployment and to replace older
applications.
IDC sees a further positive factor in the transformation process
that the software industry is just entering. That transformation
includes basic architectures (such as SOA) and the way software
is written and delivered. The associated new avenues for using
software and new functions are expected to generate new demand.
IDC says applications will become more complex as they grow more
powerful. This would create space and edge for vendors offering
applications and systems that help reduce complexity. IDC
assumes that the transformation will take considerable time but
will also spur short and medium term demand as companies
transition from legacy systems to SOA-based solutions. It
expects new software creation and delivery models to play a key
role.
IDC also identifies the growing dynamism of IT as a short term
factor: The rate at which the power and productivity of IT grows
from version to version is accelerating. At the same time,
applications markets are converging and the functional scope of
individual applications is widening, reducing the attraction of
highly specialized applications. This means the new solutions
address functionally broader markets, which increases their
chance of success. Finally, IDC notes that companies will
continue to demand more data security, increasing the demand for
IT solutions that satisfy their requirements in that respect.
The more complex software grows, the more vulnerable it becomes
to attack. This will draw companies toward powerful security
solutions, IDC says. It expects this segment to grow
significantly. IDC says the current economic problems will
impede these trends but cannot stop them.
2009 Financial
Outlook for SAP
Due to the continuing uncertainty surrounding our economic and
business environment, we will not publish specific outlook
guidance for our 2009 software and software-related service
revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
We expect our 2009 non-GAAP operating margin, which excludes a
nonrecurring deferred support revenue writedown from the
acquisition of Business Objects of approximately
9 million and acquisition-related charges, to be in
the range of 24.5% to 25.5% at constant currencies. That
includes nonrecurring restructuring costs of between
200 million and 300 million that we expect
to incur as we reduce our workforce and that we expect will
negatively impact our non-GAAP operating margin by approximately
2 to 3 percentage points. Our 2009 non-GAAP operating
margin outlook is based on the assumption that our 2009 non-GAAP
software and software-related service revenue, which excludes a
nonrecurring deferred support revenue writedown from the
acquisition of Business Objects, will be unchanged or decline
not more than 1% at constant currencies (2008:
8,623 million).
|
|
|
|
We expect a corresponding decrease in our operating income.
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
We project an effective tax rate for 2009 of 29.5% to 30.5%
(2008: 30.1%) based on U.S. GAAP income from continuing
operations.
|
|
|
|
If the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders so resolves, in
2009 we will again pay a dividend that provides a payout ratio
of about 32%.
|
Excepting acquisitions, our planned capital expenditures for
2009 will be covered in full by operating cash flow and will
chiefly be spent on completing new office buildings at various
locations.
Among the premises on which this outlook is based are those
presented concerning economic development and our expectation
that we will not benefit from any positive effects in 2009 from
a major acquisition. We also assume that our results in the
first half of 2009, and especially in the first quarter, will
hardly be comparable with our very good performance in the first
half of 2008 before the beginning of the economic crisis.
Medium-Term
Perspectives
We expect our business and revenue to continue to grow, assuming
the current economic crisis does not have long-term
consequences. Our strategy is to increase software and
software-related service revenue, which comprises software and
maintenance revenue and subscriptions and other software-related
services.
The completion of our SOA development road map (which means all
SAP solutions now run on a business process platform), the
introduction of our SAP Business ByDesign solution, and our
acquisition of Business Objects will open up potential for us to
address more markets. We estimate that the total volume of the
software and software-related services segment of the markets in
which we now operate and will operate in the future will grow
from currently about US$70 billion to about
US$75 billion by 2010.
By 2010, we hope to increase our customer numbers to about
100,000. We expect 50% of our orders received to be for new
products by 2010.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
EXCHANGE RATE EXPOSURE
Although our reporting currency is the euro, a significant
portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than
the euro. International sales are primarily made through our
subsidiaries in the respective regions and are generally
denominated in the local currency, although in certain countries
where foreign currency exchange rate exposure is considered
high, some sales may be denominated in euro or
U.S. dollars. Expenses incurred by our subsidiaries are
generally denominated in the local currency. Accordingly, the
functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency.
Therefore, movements in the foreign currency exchange rates
between the euro and the respective local currencies to which
our subsidiaries in countries that do not participate in the
euro are exposed, may materially affect our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In
general, appreciation of the euro relative to another currency
has a negative effect on our results of operations, while
depreciation of the euro has a positive effect. As a
consequence, period-to-period changes in the average exchange
rate in a particular currency can significantly affect our
revenue, operating results and net income. The principal
currencies in which our subsidiaries conduct business that are
subject to the risks described in this paragraph include the
U.S. dollar, the Japanese yen, the British pound, the Swiss
franc, the Canadian dollar, and the Australian dollar. We enter
into derivative instruments, primarily foreign exchange forward
contracts, to protect our anticipated cash flows from foreign
subsidiaries from the effects of foreign currency exchange
fluctuations. See also Item 11. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk and Note 26 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
Approximately 64% of our consolidated revenue in 2008 and
approximately 66% in 2007 was attributable to operations in
non-euro participating countries and such revenues had to be
translated into euros for financial reporting purposes.
Fluctuations in the value of the euro had negative effects on
our consolidated revenue of
67
402 million, income before income taxes of
146 million and net income of 129 million
for 2008, and had negative effects on our consolidated revenue
of 365 million, income before income taxes of
118 million and net income of 99 million
for 2007. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk.
The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
discussed in the preceding paragraph is calculated by
translating current period figures in local currency to euros at
the monthly average exchange rate for the corresponding month in
the prior year. Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
we discuss our financial performance without the effect of
foreign currency fluctuations on a constant currency
basis, which is calculated in the same manner.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the
accounting policies described in Note 3 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 18. Financial
Statements in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The application of such policies may require management to make
significant estimates, judgments and assumptions that can have a
significant impact on amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. We base our assumptions, judgments and
estimates on historical experience and various other factors
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results could differ materially from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions. The accounting policies
that most frequently require us to make significant estimates,
judgments and assumptions, and therefore are critical to
understanding our results of operations, are:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognition;
|
|
|
|
Valuation of accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
Accounting for share-based compensation;
|
|
|
|
Accounting for income taxes and uncertain income tax positions;
|
|
|
|
Valuation of acquired assets; and
|
|
|
|
Legal contingencies.
|
Our management periodically discusses these critical accounting
policies with the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board.
Historically, our significant estimates, judgments and
assumptions relative to our critical accounting policies have
not differed materially from actual results. Please refer to
Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for further
discussion of our accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues from the sale or the license of our
software products and of support services, subscriptions,
consulting, development, training, and other professional
services. The vast majority of our software is sold or licensed
in multiple-element arrangements that include support services
and often professional services, development, or other elements.
We therefore license our software generally in multiple-element
arrangements. We recognize revenue pursuant to the requirements
of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
as amended, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collectability is probable. If at the outset of an arrangement
we determine that the arrangement fee is not fixed or
determinable, revenue is deferred until the arrangement fee
becomes due and payable by the customer. If at the outset of an
arrangement we determine that collectability is not probable,
revenue is deferred until payment is received or collectability
has become probable. The determination of whether fees are fixed
or determinable or whether the fees are collectible is
inherently judgmental. As a result, the timing or amount of
revenue recognition can vary depending on what assessments have
been made.
68
Revenue on multiple-element arrangements is recognized using the
residual method when company-specific objective evidence of fair
value exists for all of the undelivered elements (for example,
support services, consulting, or other services) in the
arrangement, but does not exist for one or more delivered
elements (for example, software). We allocate revenue to each
undelivered element based on its respective company- or
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value
(VSOE), which is the price charged when that element
is sold separately or, for elements not yet sold separately, the
price established by our management if it is probable that the
price will not change before the element is sold separately. We
allocate revenue to undelivered support services based on
company-wide rates charged to renew the support services
annually after an initial period. Such renewal rates generally
represent a fixed currency amount or a fixed percentage of the
discounted software license fee charged to the customer. The
vast majority of our customers renew their annual support
service contracts. We defer revenue for all undelivered elements
based on their respective VSOEs and recognize the residual
amount of the arrangement fee attributable to the delivered
elements, if any, when the basic criteria in
SOP 97-2
have been met. We review our VSOEs at least annually. If we are
unable to establish or maintain a VSOE for one or more
undelivered elements within a multiple-element arrangement, it
could adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and
financial position because we may have to defer all or a portion
of the revenue from multiple-element arrangements.
We have ongoing relationships with many of our customers and
often enter into several transactions with the same customer
within close proximity in time. Therefore, it is critical to
determine what constitutes a multiple-element arrangement with a
particular customer. Also determining what constitutes a
separate element in the arrangement may involve judgment; for
example, a right to an incremental discount on a customers
future purchases of software or services could become a separate
element in a multiple-element arrangement which we need to
separately account for if that incremental discount is
considered to be significant.
If a multiple-element arrangement involves significant
production, modification, or customization of the software, or
is otherwise determined to contain elements (such as consulting
services) that are deemed to be essential to the functionality
of the software elements, software revenue, which might
otherwise be recognized immediately, needs to be deferred and
recognized as the essential services are provided. The
determination of whether the arrangement involves significant
production, modification, or customization of the software or
whether an element is essential to the other elements could be
complex and requires the use of judgment.
Also, the determination of the amount of revenue from custom
joint development agreements, development services and
consulting services to recognize in a given period typically is
based on the amount of work completed up to that point. This
requires us to make estimates about total cost to complete the
project and the stage of completion. The assumptions, estimates,
and uncertainties inherent in determining the stage of
completion affect the timing and amounts of revenues and
expenses reported. If we do not have a sufficient basis to
measure the progress of completion or to estimate the total
contract revenues and costs, revenue is recognized when the
project is complete and, if applicable, final acceptance is
received from the customer. Changes in estimates of progress
towards completion and of contract revenues and contract costs
are accounted for as cumulative
catch-up
adjustments to the reported revenues for the applicable contract.
Valuation of
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amounts less an
allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful
accounts represents our best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in our existing accounts receivable portfolio. We
determine the allowance for doubtful accounts using a
two-step-approach. After giving consideration to the financial
solvency of specific customers, we evaluate homogenous
portfolios of receivables according to their default risk
primarily based on the age of the receivable and historical loss
experience, but also taking into consideration general market
factors such as the current economic crisis and how that might
impact our receivable portfolio. A continuation or worsening of
the economic crisis may lead to additional write-offs.
69
We believe that the accounting estimate related to the
establishment of the allowance for doubtful accounts is a
critical accounting policy because the assessment of whether a
receivable is collectible is inherently judgmental and requires
the use of assumptions about customer defaults that could change
significantly. Under U.S. GAAP, a valuation allowance must
be recognized when it is probable that a credit loss will occur
and the amount of such loss is reasonably estimable. Judgment is
required when we evaluate available information about a
particular customers financial situation to determine
whether an allowance for that specific account is necessary.
Basing the general allowance for the remaining receivables on
our historical loss experience, too, is highly judgmental as
history may not be indicative of future development,
particularly in unusual and extreme global economic
circumstances resulting from the global financial crisis.
Changes in our estimates about the allowance for doubtful
accounts could materially impact the reported assets and
expenses in our financial statements and net income could be
adversely affected if actual credit losses exceed our estimates.
Total accounts receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007
were 3,130 million and 2,898 million,
respectively, which were net of an allowance for bad debts of
51 million in 2008 and 21 million in 2007.
Net amounts charged to expense/(income) to provide for
allowances for doubtful accounts were 29 million,
6 million and (40) million, during 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively.
Specific customer credit loss risks are charged to the
respective cost of software and maintenance or cost of service.
Customer credit loss risks based on aging of the receivables are
classified as general bad debt expense, which is included in
Other operating income/expense, net as disclosed in
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
Charges for credit loss risks were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Specific customer credit loss risks
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Customer credit loss risks based on aging of the
receivables charged to expense/(income)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts charged to expense/(income) for allowances for
doubtful accounts
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable written off against the allowance for
doubtful accounts approximated 3 million,
8 million and 5 million during 2008, 2007,
and 2006, respectively.
Accounting for
Share-Based Compensation
As further explained in Note 27 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 18 Financial
Statements, as of December 31, 2008 we had two
share-based compensation plans classified as equity awards (SAP
Stock Option Plan 2002 and Long Term Incentive 2000 Plan) and
four share-based compensation plans that are classified as
liability: STAR Plan; Incentive Plan 2010; Virtual Stock Option
Plan 2007; and Business Objects Plan. Furthermore, we have
various employee share purchase plans. Effective January 1,
2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), using the modified-prospective
transition method. Accordingly, equity-classified awards are
measured at grant date fair value and are not subsequently
remeasured. Liability-classified awards are remeasured to fair
value at each balance sheet date until the award is settled.
For the years presented in our consolidated financial statements
in Item 18 Financial Statements, we did not
change any plan terms of our existing share-based compensation
plans. The historical Business Objects plans were modified by
Business Objects in anticipation of the closing of our
acquisition of Business Objects in accordance with local
regulations to preserve the liquidity of the shares underlying
the options and restricted stock units granted under these
plans. Options and restricted stock units granted under the
Business Objects plans included several plans, some of which
related to employees of companies previously acquired by
Business Objects. For further information, see Note 27 to
our consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
70
To estimate the fair values of our stock options and convertible
bonds granted under the share-based compensation plans
classified as equity awards (Stock Option Plan 2002 and Long
Term Incentive 2000 Plan) we used the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model. As described in Note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements, this option-pricing model requires
that we use a number of assumptions, including expected future
stock price volatility and expected option life (which
represents our estimate of the average amount of time remaining
until the options are exercised or expire unexercised).
The last stock options granted under SAP SOP 2002 Plan and
Long Term Incentive 2000 Plan were granted in 2006 and 2002,
respectively. For options granted in 2006 and 2005, the expected
life of the options was determined using the simplified
method to be 3.5 years, which represented the average
of the vesting period and the contractual term of the awards.
This approach was used because we did not have sufficient
information about the historical exercise behavior of
equity-based options granted to our employees. For awards
granted from 2002 to 2004, the expected term of the awards was
determined to be 2.5 years. Expected volatilities are based
on implied volatilities of traded options to purchase our common
share granted in 2006 and 2005 and based on historical data for
options granted between 2002 and 2004.
Additionally, our share price on the date of grant influences
the option value. Even though the exercise price of most options
equals or is connected to the quoted market price of our stock
on the grant date, the higher the share price, the higher the
option value.
We intend to continue using share-based compensation awards to
attract and retain senior managers and select employees.
However, we do not intend to grant any more options under
equity-classified awards and instead intend to make use of
share-based compensation awards classified as a liability.
For purposes of determining the estimated fair value of our
stock options, we believe expected volatility is the most
sensitive assumption. Changes in the volatility assumption could
significantly impact the estimated fair values calculated by the
Black-Scholes-Merton or other binomial option-pricing model.
Accounting for
Income Taxes and Uncertain Income Tax Positions
We conduct operations and earn income in numerous foreign
countries and are subject to changing tax laws in multiple
jurisdictions within the countries in which we operate. In
addition, there are numerous transactions where the ultimate tax
outcome is uncertain such as those involving revenue sharing and
cost reimbursement arrangements between SAP Group companies.
Significant judgments are necessary in determining our worldwide
income tax accruals and provisions in accordance with
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. Although we believe we have made reasonable
estimates about the ultimate resolution of our tax uncertainties
based on current tax laws and our interpretation of current tax
laws, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of
these matters will be consistent with what is reflected in our
historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences
could have a material effect on our income tax provision and net
income in the period in which such determinations are made.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in
which we expect the differences to reverse. We record a
valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In
evaluating our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we
consider all available positive and negative evidence, including
our past operating results, our forecast of future taxable
income. Our judgments regarding future taxable income are based
upon expectations of market conditions and other facts and
circumstances. Any adverse change to the underlying facts or our
assumptions could require that we reduce the carrying value of
our net deferred tax assets. Furthermore, our use of different
estimates, assumptions and judgments in connection with tax
planning strategies and tax uncertainties could result in
materially different carrying values of our income tax asset and
liability amounts and therefore could adversely impact our
recorded income tax amounts.
71
As of December 31, 2008, we have cumulative undistributed
earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries of approximately
2.764 million that are currently deemed to be
permanently reinvested. Changes in economic or other
circumstances may impact our decision to repatriate some or all
of these undistributed earnings which would result in the
recognition of additional income tax liabilities.
Valuation of
acquired assets
We account for all business combinations using the purchase
method of accounting which requires that the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at
their estimated fair values. Any excess of the acquisition cost
of the business combination over the estimated fair values of
the identifiable net assets acquired (e.g. any tangible assets
acquired, those intangible assets that are required to be
recognized and reported separately from goodwill, and any
liabilities assumed) is recorded as goodwill in the balance
sheet and is generally denominated in the local currency of the
related acquisition. Goodwill is allocated to our segments based
on fair values.
In addition to assets acquired in business combinations, as part
of our ongoing operations we purchase other intangible assets
such as intellectual property. These acquired assets are
reviewed for impairment when significant events occur or there
are changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying
amount of these assets or asset groups may not be recoverable.
Estimating the fair value to be assigned to each class of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed and the determination of the
appropriate reporting units to which any goodwill should be
allocated involves considerable management judgment. The
necessary valuations are based on information available at the
acquisition date and are based on expectations and assumptions
that have been deemed reasonable by management. These judgments,
estimates and assumptions can materially affect our results of
operations.
In connection with the acquisition of Business Objects, we
recognized goodwill of approximately 3.5 billion and
identifiable intangible assets of approximately
1.0 billion. Factors that contributed to our
recognition of goodwill in connection with the acquisition of
Business Objects are expected synergies from combining the
activities of the two companies as well as assets which cannot
be recognized separately apart from goodwill because they are
not identifiable (such as the quality and level of education of
the workforce). The results of Business Objects have been
included in the consolidated financial statements from the date
of acquisition. In connection with the acquisition we incurred
restructuring costs as a result of severance and relocation of
workforce, the elimination of duplicate facilities, and contract
terminations. Such costs have been recognized as liabilities of
the acquired entities.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142), we review the carrying amount
of goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. Additionally, we
perform an impairment assessment of goodwill and other
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of goodwill and other
intangible assets may not be recoverable. In making that
assessment, we use certain assumptions and estimates about
future cash flows, which are complex and often subjective. They
can be affected by a variety of factors, including changes in
our business strategy, our internal forecasts and estimation of
our weighted-average cost of capital.
Due to the above factors, actual cash flows and values could
vary significantly from the forecasted future cash flows and
related values derived using the discounted cash flow method.
Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made
in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, different
assumptions and estimates could materially affect our reported
financial results. We did not record any impairment charges on
our goodwill or intangible assets during fiscal year 2008.
However, the amount of goodwill and other intangible assets on
our consolidated balance sheet has increased significantly in
2008, primarily as a result of the Business Objects acquisition.
As of December 31, 2008, the carrying amounts of our
goodwill and intangible assets, net were
5,009 million and 1,127 million,
respectively (2007: 1,423 million and
403 million, respectively). Although we do not
currently have an indication of any significant impairment,
72
there can be no assurance that impairment charges will not occur
in the future. For more information, see Note 16 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
Legal Contingencies
Currently we are involved in various claims and legal
proceedings. We review the status of each significant matter on
at least a quarterly basis and assess our potential financial
and business exposures related to such matters. We make a
provision for a liability for such matters when it is both
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the loss can be reasonably estimated pursuant to
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Significant judgment is required in (a) the determination
whether a liability has been incurred, (b) the
determination of the probability of loss, (c) the
determination whether the amount of a probable loss is
reasonably estimable and (d) the estimate of the probable
loss. Due to uncertainties relating to these matters, accruals
are based only on the best information available at the time. As
additional information becomes available, we reassess the
potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation
and may revise our estimates and any related accruals. Such
revisions to our estimates of the potential liabilities could
have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial position. The effects of changes in estimates of
potential liabilities related to our legal contingencies had no
material impact on 2008, 2007 or 2006 results. See Note 24
to our consolidated financial statements in Item 18
Financial Statements.
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS NOT YET ADOPTED
See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18 Financial Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments is funds generated from our business operations.
Over the past several years, our principal use of cash has been
to support continuing operations and our capital expenditure
requirements resulting from our growth, to pay dividends on our
shares, to buy back SAP shares in the open market and to acquire
businesses. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in euro
and U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2008.
We use global centralized financial management to control liquid
assets as well as monitor exposure to interest rates and
currencies with the goal of achieving adequate liquidity for the
SAP Group. High levels of liquid assets and marketable
securities provide a strategic reserve, helping keep SAP
flexible, sound, and independent. The 1 billion
syndicated credit facility and other, bilateral lines of credit
are currently available for additional liquidity if required.
We believe that our working capital is sufficient to meet our
present operational needs and, together with expected cash flows
from operations, will support our currently planned capital
expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. However,
given the current uncertain economic environment, there can be
no assurance that a further downturn in the economy worldwide,
in a particular region, or in demand for our products and
services in general, will not have a material adverse impact on
our liquidity.
To complement or expand our business in the future, we have made
and expect to make acquisitions of businesses, products and
technologies, and to enter into joint venture arrangements.
These acquisitions or joint venture arrangements may require
additional financing. Due to the financial market crisis
additional financing will generally be more difficult to obtain.
Refinancing costs (credit spreads) have significantly increased
during the last
12-18 months.
In connection with our acquisition of Business Objects we
entered into a 5 billion credit facility in October
2007 (subsequently reduced to 4.45 billion as of
December 31, 2007 and further reduced to
2.95 billion in February 2008). The credit facility
has to be repaid by December 31, 2009. As of March 9,
2009, we had outstanding borrowings of 2.3 billion on
this credit facility.
73
Due to the current global economic conditions and the credit
markets in particular, refinancing conditions have become
markedly more difficult. Therefore, we monitor funding options
available in the capital markets and trends in the availability
of funds as well as the cost of such funding. Depending on our
future cash needs and future market conditions, we might issue
debt instruments available to us with a view to maintaining
financial flexibility and limiting repayment risk.
The table below presents our cash and cash equivalents as well
as short-term investments as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
Restricted
cash(1)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)%
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)%
|
|
|
(1) |
The restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2007
represents a security deposit that served as collateral for the
credit facility entered into in connection with the acquisition
of Business Objects.
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash at banks and highly
liquid investments with original maturity of three months or
less, including mainly money market funds and time deposits.
Short-term investments consist of investments with original
maturities of greater than three months and remaining maturities
of less than one year, including time deposits, money market
funds and other available-for-sale debt and marketable equity
securities. Investments with maturities beyond one year or
certain cost- and equity-method equity investments may be
classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and
because such marketable securities represent the investment of
cash that is available for current operations. The decrease in
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments from 2007
was mainly due to the use of liquidity for acquisitions,
continued repurchase of our own shares, dividend payments, and
repayments of short-term debt. See Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18
Financial Statements for a related discussion on how we
define short-term investments.
Total net interest expenses amounted to 51 million in
2008 compared to net interest income of 135 million
in 2007 and 120 million in 2006. The change is
primarily due to strong increase in interest expenses following
the credit facility we entered into in connection with the
acquisition of Business Objects (123 million in 2008
compared to 7 million in 2007 and
4 million in 2006). Interest income was also
considerably lower due to a generally lower interest rate
environment (72 million in 2008 compared to
142 million in 2007 and 124 million in
2006). In addition to foreign currency exposure, we are
generally exposed to fluctuations in the interest rates of many
of the worlds leading industrialized countries. Our
interest income and expense are most sensitive to fluctuations
in the level of U.S. dollar and euro interest rates.
We operate globally and have subsidiaries in over 50 countries.
Our foreign subsidiaries license SAP AGs software products
to local customers and remit a certain percentage of the revenue
to SAP AG in Germany as license fees. We have experienced and
expect to experience situations where the amount of funds
transferred from our subsidiaries in certain countries to
Germany are restricted due to economic or legal reasons. The
impact of such restrictions on our intercompany transfers has
been and is expected to be insignificant.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments mainly
consisted of amounts held in U.S. dollars (approximately
361 million) and in euro (approximately
764 million) as of December 31, 2008.
74
Analysis of
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,769
|
)
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
%
|
|
|
955
|
%
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Cash provided by operating activities increased by
233 million or 12% in 2008 over 2007 mainly
attributable to effective management of our working capital, for
example, the cost-savings measures implemented in 2008.
Consistent with the revenue growth (13% in 2008), our accounts
receivable balance increased by 232 million or 8% in
2008 while our rolling
12-month
average collection period, which is measured in days sales
outstanding, or DSO (defined as average number of days from
revenue recognition to cash receipt from the customer) increased
from 66 days in 2007 to 71 days in 2008, mainly as a
result of the deteriorating economic conditions. Cash used in
investing activities increased significantly from
1,392 million in 2007 to 3,769 million in
2008 mainly due to our acquisition of Business Objects which led
to an increase of cash outflows for acquisitions by
3,101 million from 672 million in 2007 to
3,773 million in 2008. Also, in 2008 we invested
339 million in our technology and business
infrastructure by purchasing intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment, a significant portion of which represented
the cost of constructing office buildings. Cash provided by
financing activities increased by 2,568 million
mainly due to proceeds from the credit facility we entered into
in connection with our acquisition of Business Objects, but also
due to decreased spending on purchases of treasury stock (2008:
487 million; 2007: 1,005 million).
Cash provided by operating activities increased by
95 million or 5% in 2007 over 2006, mainly due to the
increase in net income. As total revenue grew, our accounts
receivable balance increased by 455 million or 19% in
2007 while our rolling
12-month
average collection period, which is measured in DSO, was reduced
from 68 days in 2006 to 66 days in 2007. Cash used in
investing activities increased significantly from
132 million in 2006 to 1,392 million in
2007. This increase is partly due to a transfer of cash to
restricted cash. The restricted cash was set up in 2007 as a
security deposit that served as collateral for a credit facility
entered into in connection with the acquisition of Business
Objects. Also, the net inflow from short-term, equity, and other
investments was significantly less than in 2006, because in 2006
we had liquidated and reallocated substantial amounts of such
investments. In addition, cash outflow for acquisitions of
unrelated companies increased to 672 million (2006:
504 million). Also, we continued to spend on
intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, amounting
to 401 million in 2007, a significant portion of
which represented the cost of construction of office buildings.
Cash used in financing activities decreased by
88 million or 6% in 2007, mainly because of a
slightly lower amount used for purchases of treasury stock
(2007: 1,005 million; 2006: 1,149 million).
Credit Lines
As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding long-term
financial debt of 2 million and outstanding
short-term financial debt of approximately
2,325 million, consisting primarily of amounts
borrowed under the 5 billion credit facility and
other lines of credit as described below.
In October 2007 we entered into a 5 billion credit
facility (subsequently reduced to 4.45 billion as of
December 31, 2007 and further reduced to
2.95 billion in February 2008) in connection
with the acquisition of Business Objects. The use of the
facility is not restricted by any financial covenants.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest of EURIBOR plus a
margin of 0.25%. As of March 9, 2009, we had an outstanding
borrowing of 2.3 billion on this credit facility.
Also, currently we are party to a revolving 1 billion
syndicated credit facility agreement with an initial term of
5 years ending November 2009. The use of the facility is
not restricted by any financial covenants.
75
Proceeds are for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under
the facility bear interest of EURIBOR or LIBOR for the
respective currency plus a margin ranging from 0.20% to 0.25%
depending on the amount drawn. We are also required to pay a
commitment fee of 0.07% per annum on unused amounts of the
available credit. We entered into this credit facility to
increase our financial flexibility. We did not, however, draw
down the facility in 2008, nor do we currently intend to draw
down on the facility. Consequently, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the facility as of December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2008, SAP AG had additional available
lines of credit totaling approximately 597 million.
As of December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings
outstanding under these lines of credit. Furthermore, certain of
our foreign subsidiaries have lines of credit available that
allow them to borrow funds in their respective local currencies
at prevailing interest rates, generally to the extent SAP AG has
guaranteed such amounts. As of December 31, 2008,
approximately 52 million was available through such
arrangements. Total aggregate borrowings under these lines of
credit amounted to 21 million as of December 31,
2008.
Authorized Capital
We also have available sources of cash through authorized
capital as outlined in Note 20 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 18 Financial
Statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
Several entities of the SAP Group have entered into operating
leases for office facilities, computer hardware and certain
other equipment. These arrangements are sometimes referred to as
a form of off-balance sheet financing. Rental expenses under
these operating leases are set forth below under
Contractual Obligations.
We have not entered into any transactions, arrangements or other
relationships with unconsolidated, variable interest entities,
as such term is defined in FASB Interpretation No. 46
(Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51.
We believe we do not have other forms of material
off-balance-sheet arrangements that would require disclosure
other than those already disclosed.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The table below presents our on- and off-balance sheet
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Short-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease
obligations(2)
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Purchase
obligations(3)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance
sheet(4)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This represents bank loans and interest thereon.
|
|
(2)
|
See Note 23 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for additional
information about operating lease obligations and the related
rental expense.
|
|
(3)
|
Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or
services that are enforceable and legally binding on us that
specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum
quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price
provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The
outstanding obligations include the
|
76
|
|
|
construction of facilities, office
equipment and car purchase commitments, food and security
services and other facility commitments.
|
Our expected contributions to our pension and other post
employment benefit plans are not included in the table above. We
expect to contribute in 2009 statutory minimum and discretionary
amounts of 2 million to our German defined benefit
plans and 29 million to our foreign defined benefit
plans, all of which are expected to be paid as cash
contributions. Our contributions to our German and foreign
defined contribution plans have ranged from
86 million to 93 million in 2006 through
2008; we expect similar contributions to be made in 2009. See
Note 19a to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for additional
information on estimated future pension benefits to be paid.
|
|
(4) |
Amounts mainly consist of employee-related liabilities
(57 million) and derivatives (31 million)
and deferred rent (36 million). Not included in the
table are noncurrent income taxes payable of
278 million, which includes provisions for
uncertainties in income taxes. Other noncurrent liabilities on
the balance sheet such as pension and other post employment
benefit liabilities, deferred compensation, deferred income and
deferred tax liabilities are not included in this table. For
additional information on liabilities see Notes 18 and 19b
to our consolidated financial statements in Item 18
Financial Statements.
|
We expect to meet these contractual obligations with existing
cash and our cash flows from operations. The timing of payments
for the above contractual obligations is based on payment
schedules for those obligations where set payments exist. For
other obligations with no set payment schedules, estimates as to
the most likely timing of cash payments have been made. The
ultimate timing of these future cash flows may differ from these
estimates.
Obligations under
Indemnifications and Guarantees
Our software license agreements generally include certain
provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our
software products infringe a third partys intellectual
property rights. To date, we have not incurred any material loss
as a result of such indemnification obligations and have not
recorded any liabilities related to such obligations.
In addition, we occasionally provide function or performance
guarantees in routine consulting contracts and development
arrangements. Based on historical experience and evaluation, we
do not believe that any material loss resulting from these
guarantees is probable. In addition, because the guarantees
relate to our own performance, no related liability has been
recorded. We also generally provide a six to twelve month
warranty on our software. Due to the nature of these warranties,
which relate to the performance of our software, we cannot
reasonably estimate the maximum exposure to loss resulting from
the warranties. Our warranty liability is included in Other
obligations. See Note 19b to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18 Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, no guarantees were
provided for performance or financial obligations of third
parties.
RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT
The SAP product development units define the business functions
and technical architecture of future software products and
realize them in software code and software-related content such
as models and methodologies.
SAPs development labs, known as SAP Labs, are our global
research and development organization with operations in various
countries throughout the world. Next to our headquarters in
Walldorf, Germany, our three largest development locations are
in India, the United States and China. This regional
diversification enhances the efficient use of local resources
and allows for closer ties to the companies in our partner
ecosystem as we jointly develop innovative products and
services. The network of SAP Labs is designed to act quickly on
new requirements from customers and the market and to accelerate
product innovation and raise productivity.
77
Complementing the SAP Labs network, SAP Research is a group
responsible for identifying emerging information technology
trends, as well as researching and building prototypes for
potential inclusion in SAP products. The fundamental business
model of SAP Research is based on co-innovation through
collaborative research with both academia and industry. SAP
Research consists of 14 interconnected research centers on five
continents. Each center is located in close proximity to an SAP
development center or on a university campus. We believe that in
the medium term we must continuously improve our portfolio of
products if we are to maintain and build on our current leading
position as a vendor of business software.
Research and development (R&D) expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
1,631 million, 1,458 million and
1,335 million, respectively. R&D expenses as a
percentage of total revenue were 14%, 14% and 14% for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
The importance of R&D was also reflected in the breakdown
of employee profiles. In 2008, our total FTE count in
development work was 15,547 (2007: 12,951). This constitutes 30%
of all SAP employees and represents a 20% rise in the number of
R&D employees since the previous year. Our acquisition of
Business Objects in 2008 contributed 1,697 new R&D
employees or 13% of this increase.
The expenses for R&D include mainly employee salaries and
the cost of externally procured development services.
78
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS,
SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
SUPERVISORY BOARD
The current members of the Supervisory Board of SAP AG, each
members principal occupation, the year in which each was
first elected and the year in which the term of each expires,
respectively, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Term
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Occupation
|
|
Elected
|
|
Expires
|
|
Prof. Dr. h.c. mult. Hasso Plattner,
Chairman(1)(2)(4)(6)(7)(8)(12)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Pekka
Ala-Pietilä(1)(7)(8)(12)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Co-founder and CEO Blyk Ltd.
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr. Wilhelm
Haarmann(1)(2)(4)(5)(9)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Attorney at Law, Certified Public
|
|
|
1988
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auditor and Certified Tax Advisor; HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft, Rechtsanwälte, Steuerberater,
Wirtschaftsprüfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Liautaud(7)(13)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
General Partner, Balderton Capital
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. h.c. Hartmut
Mehdorn(1)(5)(6)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chairperson of Executive Board, Deutsche Bahn AG
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. mult. Dr.-Ing. E.h. mult. Joachim
Milberg(1)(2)(3)(4)(7)(8)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of BMW AG
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. Erhard
Schipporeit(1)(3)(11)(12)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus
Wucherer(1)(7)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Managing Director of Dr. Klaus Wucherer Innovations- und
Technologieberatung GmbH
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Lars Lamadé, Vice
Chairman(4)(6)(10)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Employee, Project Manager Service & Support
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Thomas
Bamberger(3)(10)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Employee, Chief Controlling Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research & Breakthrough Innovation, Head of Operations
Global Service & Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panagiotis
Bissiritsas(2)(5)(10)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Employee, Support Expert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Willi
Burbach(4)(7)(10)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Employee, Developer
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Peter
Koop(4)(7)(10)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Employee, Industry Business Development Expert
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Christiane
Kuntz-Mayr(7)(14)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Employee, Deputy Chairperson of the Works Council of SAP AG
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Dr. Gerhard
Maier(2)(3)(10)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Employee, Development Project Manager
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Stefan
Schulz(5)(6)(7)(10)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Employee, Development Project Manager
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs
shareholders on May 10, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Compensation
Committee.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Member of the General Committee.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Member of the Finance and
Investment Committee.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Member of the Mediation Committee.
|
79
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Member of the Technology and
Strategy Committee.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Member of the Nomination Committee
|
|
(9)
|
|
Until January 1, 2006,
Wilhelm Haarmann practiced as a partner of Haarmann Hemmelrath
which served as special German tax counsel to SAP AG and
counseled SAP with regard to other legal matters. On
January 1, 2006, he founded HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft in Frankfurt.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs employees
on April 23, 2007.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee and
determined to be the Audit Committee financial expert.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Member of the Special Committee
|
|
(13)
|
|
Elected by SAP AGs
shareholders on June 3, 2008, replacing August-Wilhelm
Scheer who resigned from the Supervisory Board on the same day.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Replacing Helga Classen who left
the Supervisory Board on December 31, 2008 due to partial
retirement.
|
For detailed information on the Supervisory Board committees and
their tasks, including the Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee, please refer to Item 10 Additional
Information Corporate Governance.
Certain current members of the Supervisory Board of SAP AG were
members of supervisory boards and comparable governing bodies of
enterprises other than SAP AG in Germany and other countries as
of December 31, 2008. See Note 29 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 18 Financial
Statements for more detail. Apart from pension obligations
towards employees, SAP AG has not entered into contracts with
any member of the Supervisory Board that provide for benefits
upon a termination of the employment or service of the member.
Pursuant to the German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), members of the Supervisory Board
of SAP AG consist of eight representatives of the shareholders
and eight representatives of the employees. Of the eight
employee representatives, two must be nominated by the trade
unions. The elected employees must be at least 18 years of
age and must have been in the employment of SAP AG or one of its
German subsidiaries for at least one year. They must also
fulfill the other qualifications for election codified in
Section 8 of the German Works Council Constitution Act.
These qualifications include, among other things, not having
been declared ineligible or debarred from holding public office
by a court.
EXECUTIVE BOARD
The current members of the Executive Board, the year in which
each member was first appointed and the year in which the term
of each expires, respectively, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
Year Current
|
|
Name
|
|
Appointed
|
|
|
Term Expires
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann, Co-CEO
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Léo Apotheker, Co-CEO
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus Heinrich
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
John Schwarz
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Jim Hageman Snabe
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
The Executive Board members responsibilities are aligned
along SAPs value chain, spanning innovation, research and
development, production, services, marketing, training,
consulting and sales.
80
The following changes occurred in the Executive Board in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
On February 19, 2008, we announced that Business Objects
CEO John Schwarz was named member of the SAP Executive Board,
effective March 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
On April 2, 2008, we announced that the SAP Supervisory
Board named then Deputy CEO Léo Apotheker as SAPs
Co-CEO alongside Henning Kagermann, with immediate effect.
Henning Kagermann will step down as planned on May 31, 2009
at which time Léo Apotheker will be sole CEO.
|
|
|
|
Further on April 2, 2008, we announced that the SAP
Supervisory Board appointed Erwin Gunst, Bill McDermott and Jim
Hageman Snabe to the SAP Executive Board effective July 1,
2008.
|
|
|
|
On October 31, 2008, Claus Heinrich announced that he has
decided to leave SAP on May 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
On November 26, 2008, the SAP Supervisory Board named Erwin
Gunst the next labor relations director of SAP AG, effective
January 1, 2009, succeeding Claus Heinrich.
|
|
|
|
On December 31, 2008, Peter Zencke gave up this seat on the
SAP Executive Board upon expiration of his contract.
|
A description of the management responsibilities and backgrounds
of the current members of the Executive Board are as follows:
Henning Kagermann, Co-CEO (Vorstandssprecher),
61 years old, physics graduate. Henning Kagermann joined
SAP AG in 1982. He became a member of the Executive Board in
1991 and Co-CEO in 1998. In May 2003 he became sole CEO of the
Executive Board. In April 2008 he again became Co-CEO when the
SAP Supervisory Board named Léo Apotheker Co-CEO alongside
Henning Kagermann. He has overall responsibility for SAPs
strategy and business development, and is further responsible
for internal audit and top talent management.
Léo Apotheker, Co-CEO (Vorstandssprecher),
55 years old, business economist. Léo Apotheker first
joined SAP in 1988 and became a member of the Executive Board in
2002. In April 2008 he became Co-CEO alongside Henning
Kagermann. He is responsible for consulting, education,
marketing, partner management, industry solutions, and global
communications.
Werner Brandt, 55 years old, business administration
graduate. Werner Brandt joined SAP in early 2001 as the Chief
Financial Officer and member of the Executive Board. Prior to
joining SAP, Werner Brandt was CFO and member of the Executive
Board of Fresenius Medical Care AG since 1999. In this role, he
was also responsible for labor relations. Before joining
Fresenius Medical Care AG, Werner Brandt headed the finance
function of the European operations of Baxter International Inc.
His responsibilities at SAP include finance and administration,
shared services, global intellectual property,
mergers & acquisitions, and SAP Ventures.
Erwin Gunst, 49 years old, holds a degree in
commercial engineering. He joined SAP in 1988 and became Chief
Operating Officer and member of its Executive Board on
July 1, 2008. He is responsible for company operations and
processes, global human resources (including labor relations),
internal SAP IT, and the management of all SAP Labs worldwide.
Claus Heinrich, 53 years old, business management
and operations research graduate. Claus Heinrich joined SAP in
1987 and became a member of the Executive Board in 1996. On
October 31, 2008, he announced that he will leave SAP on
May 31, 2009.
Bill McDermott, 47 years old, holds a masters
degree in business administration. He joined SAP in 2002 and
became a member of its Executive Board on July 1, 2008. He
is responsible for global field operations.
Gerhard Oswald, 55 years old, economics
graduate. Gerhard Oswald joined SAP in 1981 and
became a member of the Executive Board in 1996. He is
responsible for global service and support.
John Schwarz, 58 years old, has diploma in business
administration and a degree in computer science. John Schwarz
joined SAP in 2008 and became a member of its Executive Board on
March 1, 2008. He is chief executive officer (CEO) of
Business Objects, a business unit within the SAP Group. He
joined Business Objects in
81
September 2005 as its CEO. Prior to Business Objects, he was
president and chief operating officer of Symantec Corporation.
He is responsible for the SAP BusinessObjects business unit, the
Global Ecosystem & Partner Group and for Corporate
Business Development.
Jim Hagemann Snabe, 43 years old, holds a master
degree in operational research. He joined SAP in 1990 and became
a member of its Executive Board on July 1, 2008. He is
responsible for product development. This includes solutions for
large enterprises, small and medium size enterprises, and the
technology platform.
The members of the Executive Board of SAP AG as of
December 31, 2008 that are members on other supervisory
boards and comparable governing bodies of enterprises, other
than SAP, in Germany and other countries, are set forth in
Note 29 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18 Financial Statements. Apart from
pension obligations, SAP AG has not entered into contracts with
any member of the Executive Board that provide for benefits upon
a termination of the employment of service of the member.
To our knowledge, there are no family relationships among the
Supervisory Board and Executive Board members.
COMPENSATION
This compensation report outlines the criteria that we apply to
determine compensation for Executive Board and Supervisory Board
members, discloses the amount of compensation paid, and
describes the compensation systems. It also contains information
about Executive Board members share-based compensation
plans, shares held by Executive Board and Supervisory Board
members, and the directors dealings required to be
disclosed in accordance with the German Securities Trading Act.
Compensation for
Executive Board Members
Compensation
System
Until and including 2008, the Executive Board members
compensation system has been set by the Compensation Committee,
a committee of the Supervisory Board chaired by Hasso Plattner
(chairperson of the Supervisory Board). Its other members are
Panagiotis Bissiritsas, Wilhelm Haarmann, Gerhard Maier, and
Joachim Milberg. In the future, the full Supervisory Board will
assume this responsibility, in accordance with the amended
German Corporate Governance Code.
Executive Board members compensation is intended to
reflect the Groups size and global presence as well as our
economic and financial standing. The level is internationally
competitive to reward committed, successful work in a dynamic
environment.
The compensation of the Executive Board as a body is
performance-based. It has three elements: a fixed element
(salary), a performance-related element (directors
profit-sharing), and a long-term incentive element (share-based
compensation).
A compensation target is set for the total of fixed and
performance-related elements. We review the compensation target
every year in the light of our business and directors
compensation at comparable companies on the international stage.
Every year, the Compensation Committee sets the target
performance-related compensation, reflecting the relevant values
in SAPs budget for that year. The number of virtual stock
options issued in 2008 to each individual member of the
Executive Board by way of share-based compensation was decided
by the Compensation Committee at its meeting on March 3,
2008, and reflected the fair value of the options.
The following criteria apply to the elements of Executive Board
compensation for 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
The fixed element is paid as a monthly salary.
|
|
|
|
The amount of performance-related compensation to be paid out in
respect of 2008 depends on the SAP Groups achievement of
its targets for (non-GAAP) operating income, (non-GAAP) software
and
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
software-related service revenue growth at constant currencies,
and the (non-GAAP) operating margin at constant currencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2009, the Supervisory Boards
Compensation Committee assessed SAPs performance against
the agreed targets and determined how much performance-related
compensation was payable. The payment will be made after the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in May 2009.
|
|
|
|
The regular form of share-based compensation is the issue of
virtual stock options under the terms of the 2007 stock option
plan (SAP SOP 2007). For the terms and details of SAP
SOP 2007, see Note 27 to our consolidated financial
statements in ITEM 18. Financial Statements.
|
Amount of
Compensation
Executive Board members compensation was as follows in
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Related
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Elements
|
|
|
Element
|
|
|
Incentive Elements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
Share-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit-
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
Sharing
|
|
|
(SAP SOP
2007)(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
750.0
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
2,606.1
|
|
|
|
948.4
|
|
|
|
4,320.2
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
687.5
|
|
|
|
334.5
|
|
|
|
2,388.9
|
|
|
|
632.3
|
|
|
|
4,043.2
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,636.8
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(3)
|
|
|
227.5
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036.1
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,633.1
|
|
Bill
McDermott(3)
|
|
|
395.2
|
|
|
|
142.4
|
|
|
|
631.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168.9
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
627.9
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
3,241.2
|
|
John
Schwarz(4)
|
|
|
424.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
1,295.2
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,311.7
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(3)
|
|
|
227.5
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
790.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040.3
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
455.0
|
|
|
|
143.5
|
|
|
|
1,581.0
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
2,756.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,532.6
|
|
|
|
1,362.0
|
|
|
|
14,826.5
|
|
|
|
4,467.2
|
|
|
|
25,188.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Insurance contributions, benefits
in kind, expenses for maintenance of two households due to work
abroad, compensation from seats on other governing bodies in the
SAP Group, leave compensation, reimbursement of legal fees.
|
|
2)
|
|
Fair value at the time of
allocation.
|
|
3)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since July 1, 2008. (The table shows compensation since
that date.)
|
|
4)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since March 1, 2008. (The table shows compensation since
that date.)
|
The total compensation of all Executive Board members in fiscal
year 2008 for work for SAP excluding compensation relating to
the office of Executive Board member was 8,741,300. This
was primarily compensation earned as SAP employees before they
took their Executive Board seats after the beginning of the
year. It includes, among other elements, share-based
compensation under SAP SOP 2007.
The values for regular share-based compensation in the table
above result from the following allocations of SAP SOP 2007
virtual stock options granted in 2008.
83
The following table shows total Executive Board compensation in
2007, including SAP SOP 2007 stock options granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Elements
|
|
|
Element
|
|
|
Incentive Elements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
Share-Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit-
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Other1)
|
|
|
Sharing
|
|
|
(SAP SOP
2007)(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
728.5
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
4,219.7
|
|
|
|
949.1
|
|
|
|
5,913.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shai Agassi (member until March 31,
2007)(4)
|
|
|
161.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
446.8(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
485.6
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
2,813.1
|
|
|
|
632.7
|
|
|
|
3,990.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
443.4
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
2,568.5
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
3,630.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
443.4
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
2,568.5
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
3,609.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
443.4
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
2,568.5
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
3,604.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
443.4
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
2,568.5
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
3,617.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,149.0
|
|
|
|
182.4
|
|
|
|
17,753.6
|
|
|
|
3,892.6
|
|
|
|
24,977.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Insurance contributions, benefits
in kind, expenses for maintenance of two households due to work
abroad, compensation from seats on other governing bodies in the
SAP Group.
|
|
2)
|
|
Fair value at the time of
allocation.
|
|
3)
|
|
The portion of the directors
profit-sharing for January through March 2007 was calculated on
the basis of the actual directors profit-sharing paid in
2006.
|
|
4)
|
|
Shai Agassi left the Executive
Board on March 31, 2007. His employment contract with SAP
ended on April 30, 2007.
|
Share-Based Compensation Under SAP SOP 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per Right
|
|
|
Elements
|
|
|
per Right on
|
|
|
Total Value on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
133,396
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
948.4
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
623.0
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
88,933
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
632.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
415.3
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
577.3
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
379.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
628,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,467.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,934.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since July 1, 2008. (No allocations were made after that
date.)
|
|
2)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since March 1, 2008. (The table shows allocations since
that date.)
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Allocations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per Right
|
|
|
Elements
|
|
|
per Right on
|
|
|
Total Value on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
at Time of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
118,637
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
949.1
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
1,012.0
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
79,093
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
632.7
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
674.7
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
616.0
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
616.0
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
616.0
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
|
|
|
616.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
486,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,892.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,150.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-of-Service
Undertakings
Retirement
Pension Plan
Members of the Executive Board receive a retirement pension when
they reach the retirement age of 60 and vacate their Executive
Board seat or a disability pension if, before reaching the
regular retirement age, they become subject to occupational
disability or permanent incapacity. A surviving dependents
pension is paid on the death of a former member of the Executive
Board. The disability pension is 100% of the vested retirement
pension entitlement and is payable until but not after the
beneficiarys 60th birthday. The surviving
dependents pension is 60% of the retirement pension or
vested disability pension entitlement at death. Entitlements are
enforceable against SAP AG.
The benefit payable has been agreed with the active Executive
Board members. If service is ended prematurely, pension
entitlement is reduced in proportion as the actual length of
service stands in relation to the maximum possible length of
service.
On January 1, 2000, SAP AG introduced a contributory
retirement pension plan. At that time, the performance-based
retirement plan was discontinued for Executive Board members.
Entitlements accrued up to December 31, 1999, were
unaffected. The benefits are derived from any accrued
entitlements on December 31, 1999, under performance-based
pension agreements and a salary-linked contribution for the
period commencing January 1, 2000. The contribution is 4%
of applicable compensation up to the applicable income threshold
plus 14% of applicable compensation above the applicable income
threshold. For this purpose, applicable compensation is 90% of
target annual salary. The applicable income threshold is the
statutory annual income threshold for the state pension plan in
Germany (West), as amended from time to time.
An exceptional agreement applies to Executive Board member
Léo Apotheker. Léo Apothekers agreement provides
only for a retirement pension, and the pension contribution
reflects his participation in the French social security system.
Henning Kagermanns rights to retirement pension benefits
will be increased by further annual contributions because he has
remained a member of the Executive Board after his
60th birthday.
Executive Board member Bill McDermott has rights to future
benefits under the pension plan of SAP America, Inc. The pension
plan of SAP America, Inc. is a cash balance plan that provides
on retirement either monthly pension payments or a lump sum. The
pension becomes available from the beneficiarys
65th birthday. Subject to certain conditions, the plan also
provides earlier payment or invalidity benefits.
85
In addition, for the following members of the Executive Board
SAP paid pension contributions to third parties in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
474.5
|
|
Jim Hagemann Snabe
|
|
|
92.1
|
|
SAP made no retirement pension plan contributions in respect of
Executive Board member John Schwarz in 2008.
The following table shows the change in total projected benefit
obligation (PBO) and in the total accruals for pension
obligations to Executive Board members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henning
|
|
|
Léo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kagermann
|
|
|
Apotheker
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Werner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claus E.
|
|
|
Bill
|
|
|
Gerhard
|
|
|
Dr. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Co-CEO)
|
|
|
(Co-CEO)
|
|
|
Shai Agassi
|
|
|
Brandt
|
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
Heinrich
|
|
|
McDermott
|
|
|
Oswald
|
|
|
Zencke
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
PBO January 1, 2007
|
|
|
5,334.7
|
|
|
|
445.4
|
|
|
|
356.8
|
|
|
|
593.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,015.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,284.3
|
|
|
|
3,875.9
|
|
|
|
16,905.7
|
|
Less plan assets market value January 1, 2007
|
|
|
4,582.5
|
|
|
|
603.4
|
|
|
|
246.4
|
|
|
|
408.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,763.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,015.1
|
|
|
|
2,947.0
|
|
|
|
12,566.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued January 1, 2007
|
|
|
752.2
|
|
|
|
(158.0
|
)
|
|
|
110.4
|
|
|
|
185.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269.2
|
|
|
|
928.9
|
|
|
|
4,339.7
|
|
PBO change in 2007
|
|
|
530.5
|
|
|
|
(22.9
|
)
|
|
|
(320.9
|
)
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269.5
|
)
|
|
|
(228.4
|
)
|
|
|
(575.2
|
)
|
Plan assets change in 2007
|
|
|
645.5
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
(199.0
|
)
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301.3
|
|
|
|
407.9
|
|
|
|
1,550.5
|
|
PBO December 31, 2007
|
|
|
5,865.2
|
|
|
|
422.5
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
613.7
|
|
|
|
280.3
|
|
|
|
2,730.9
|
|
|
|
588.4
|
|
|
|
3,014.8
|
|
|
|
3,647.5
|
|
|
|
17,199.2
|
|
Less plan assets market value December 31, 2007
|
|
|
5,228.0
|
|
|
|
630.4
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
510.7
|
|
|
|
272.9
|
|
|
|
2,028.7
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
2,316.4
|
|
|
|
3,354.9
|
|
|
|
14,434.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued December 31, 2007
|
|
|
637.2
|
|
|
|
(207.9
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
103.0
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
702.2
|
|
|
|
543.4
|
|
|
|
698.4
|
|
|
|
292.6
|
|
|
|
2,764.8
|
|
PBO change in 2008
|
|
|
(277.2
|
)
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
108.9
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
366.6
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
432.2
|
|
Plan assets change in 2008
|
|
|
277.2
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.3
|
|
|
|
(224.8
|
)
|
|
|
282.6
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
320.2
|
|
|
|
431.8
|
|
|
|
1,217.0
|
|
PBO December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,588.0
|
|
|
|
439.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701.8
|
|
|
|
389.2
|
|
|
|
2,811.9
|
|
|
|
955.0
|
|
|
|
3,099.1
|
|
|
|
3,610.7
|
|
|
|
17,595.5
|
|
Less plan assets market value December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,505.2
|
|
|
|
658.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624.0
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
2,311.3
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
2,636.6
|
|
|
|
3,786.7
|
|
|
|
15,604.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued December 31, 2008
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
(219.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.8
|
|
|
|
341.1
|
|
|
|
500.6
|
|
|
|
921.7
|
|
|
|
462.5
|
|
|
|
(176.0
|
)
|
|
|
1,991.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
When Erwin Gunst joined the
Executive Board and his employment with SAPs Switzerland
affiliate ended, his vested plan funds were transferred to a
vested benefits account.
|
The following table shows the annual pension entitlement of each
member of the Executive Board on reaching age 60 based on
entitlements from performance-based and salary-linked plans
vested on December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested on
|
|
|
Vested on
|
|
|
Vested on
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
334.9
|
(1)
|
|
|
322.7
|
(1)
|
|
|
289.8
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
Erwin Gunst
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
186.1
|
|
|
|
175.2
|
|
|
|
165.5
|
|
Bill McDermott
|
|
|
121.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
201.2
|
|
|
|
192.8
|
|
|
|
184.6
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
226.5
|
|
|
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
207.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Due to the extension of Henning
Kagermanns contract beyond his 60th birthday, this value
represents the retirement pension entitlement that he would
receive after his current Executive Board contract expires on
May 31, 2009, based on the entitlements vested on
December 31, 2008.
|
86
These are vested entitlements. To the extent that members
continue to serve on the Executive Board and that therefore more
contributions are made for them in the future, pension actually
payable at age 60 will be more than shown in the table.
In 2008, pension benefits of 763,000 were paid to former
Executive Board members (2007: 743,000). On
December 31, 2008, the PBO for former Executive Board
members was 11,367,000 (2007: 11,587,000). Plan
assets of 12,646,000 are available to service these
obligations (2007: 11,811,000).
Postcontractual
Noncompete Provisions
During the agreed
12-month
postcontractual noncompete period, Executive Board members
receive abstention payments corresponding to 50% of their final
average contractual compensation as members. SAP deducts the
abstention compensation from any amount it owes the member under
the pension plan.
End of
Term in Office and of Employment Contract
Peter Zenckes term of office on the Executive Board
expired on December 31, 2008, as did the notice period in
his contract of employment. In accordance with his contract,
since retirement he has been receiving abstention payments for a
12-month
postcontractual noncompete period corresponding to 50% of his
final average contractual compensation as a member.
Early
Termination
The standard contract for all Executive Board members since
January 1, 2006, provides that on termination before full
term, SAP AG will pay to the member the outstanding part of the
compensation target for the entire remainder of the term,
appropriately discounted for early payment. A member has no
claim to that payment if he or she leaves SAP for reasons for
which he or she is responsible.
If an Executive Board members post on the Executive Board
expires or ceases to exist because of, or as a consequence of,
change or restructuring or due to a change of control, SAP AG
and each Executive Board member has the right to terminate the
employment contract within eight weeks of the occurrence by
giving six months notice. A change of control is deemed to
occur when a third party is required to make a mandatory
takeover offer to the shareholders of SAP AG under the German
Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act, when SAP AG merges with
another company and becomes the subsumed entity, or when a
control or profit transfer agreement is concluded with SAP AG as
the dependent company. An Executive Board members contract
can also be terminated before full term if his or her
appointment as an SAP AG Executive Board member is revoked in
connection with a change of control.
We have agreed payments of 4,120,600 for Claus Heinrich in
relation to the ending of his contract with SAP on May 31,
2009, in accordance with the above agreements on payments made
for early termination. He will receive 658,800 in respect
of the portion of the directors profit-sharing bonus to
which he is entitled for 2009. We have set aside the
postcontractual noncompete provisions in his contract.
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVES FOR THE EXECUTIVE BOARD
Members of the Executive Board hold virtual stock options under
SAP SOP 2007, stock appreciation rights under the Incentive
Plan 2010, stock options under SAP SOP 2002, and stock
options and convertible bonds under the Long Term Incentive
(LTI) Plan 2000 that were granted to them in previous years. For
the terms and details of these plans, see Note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements in ITEM 18.
Financial Statements.
SAP
SOP 2007
The table below shows Executive Board members holdings, on
December 31, 2008, of virtual stock options issued to them
under the SAP SOP 2007 plan since its inception, including
virtual stock options issued to them both during and before
their respective membership of the Executive Board.
87
The strike price for an option is 110% of the base price. The
base price is the average closing price of one SAP share in the
Frankfurt stock exchange Xetra trading system over the 20
consecutive business days immediately starting the day after the
announcement of the Companys preliminary annual results.
The premium of 10%, which is payable in addition to the base
price, serves the purpose of rendering the exercise of the
option economically reasonable only after the stock exchange
price of the SAP share has risen by at least 10% as compared
with the price used to determine the base price. The issued
options have a term of five years and can only be exercised on
specified dates after the two-year vesting period. Therefore,
none of the options held could be exercised on December 31,
2008.
SAP
SOP 2007 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
per Unit on
|
|
|
Accrual on
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
per Unit at
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Time of Grant
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
118,637
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
363.3
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
133,396
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
259.6
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
79,093
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
242.2
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
88,933
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
173.0
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
221.2
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
56,258
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
172.3
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
70,284
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
136.8
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
221.2
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
62,508
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
191.4
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
70,284
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
136.8
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
221.2
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
37,505
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
56,228
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
109.4
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
72,216
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
221.2
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,574.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member since July 1, 2008;
the holding was allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member since March 1, 2008
|
Incentive Plan
2010
The additional nonrecurring share-based compensation awarded in
2006 comprises STARs for the Incentive Plan
2010 share-based compensation plan. The plan is a
nonrecurring incentive with a term of up to five years, intended
to give more encouragement than previously for innovation and to
ensure the Executive Board actions remain focused on a long-term
goal. The Incentive Plan 2010 is a share-based compensation plan
intended to reward a substantial increase in our market
capitalization. The Executive Board will qualify for payout
under the plan only if, not later than the end of 2010,
SAPs average market capitalization during the last six
months of a year is not less than 50% greater than its average
value between July 1 and December 31, 2005,
88
(base value: 44,794,067,259) and SAP stock outperforms the
S&P North Software-Software
Indextm
(which is the successor of the GSTI Software index) over the
same period. Payouts are scaled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
If market capitalization does not increase by 50% or more, the
Executive Board will not receive a payout.
|
|
|
|
If market capitalization increases by more than 50% but less
than 100%, target achievement will be measured progressively.
|
|
|
|
If SAPs market capitalization increases not less than
twofold during the said period, the Executive Board will receive
a payout of 100 million.
|
The STARs awarded to Executive Board members under this plan
expire on December 31, 2010. If the target 100% increase in
market capitalization is reached at an earlier date, while at
the same time the stock is outperforming the S&P North
Software-Software Index, the plan ends at that earlier date. All
payouts under the plan are cash; no new SAP shares will be
issued. A beneficiary cannot exercise a STAR if he or she would
take a windfall profit; that is, a substantial extraordinary
unforeseen profit arising out of circumstances not intended by
the Executive Board. All decisions in this regard or concerning
appropriate reduction of plan payouts are at the sole discretion
of the Compensation Committee of the Supervisory Board. For the
terms and details of this plan, see Note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements in ITEM 18.
Financial Statements.
Nonrecurring Share-Based Compensation: Incentive Plan 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
Fair Value per
|
|
|
Unit on
|
|
|
Accrual on
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unit at Time of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
188,182
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
125,455
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
226.8
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
28,815
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
45,345
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
17,290
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
62,727
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
113.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
655,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member since July 1, 2008;
the rights were allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board
|
89
SAP
SOP 2002
The table below shows Executive Board members
December 31, 2008, holdings of stock options issued in
previous years under the SAP SOP 2002 plan since its
inception.
The strike prices for SAP SOP 2002 stock options are 110%
of the base price of an SAP AG common share. The base price is
the arithmetic mean closing auction price for SAP stock in the
Xetra trading system (or its successor system) over the five
business days immediately before the issue date of that stock
option. The strike price cannot be less than the closing auction
price on the day before the issue date. As a result of the
issuance on December 21, 2006, of bonus shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on exercise
each stock option now entitles its beneficiary to four shares.
For better comparability with the price of SAP stock since
implementation of the capital increase, the following table
shows not the number (quantity) of options but the number
(quantity) of shares to which they entitle the holder.
Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per share and
not per option. The number of shares shown in the table is four
times the number of options, and the strike price for an option
is four times the strike price per share shown in the table.
No rights expired or were forfeited in the report year.
SAP
SOP 2002 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
in 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
267,820
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,820
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
143,404
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,404
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
95,604
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,604
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
61,264
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,264
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
44,596
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,596
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
77,296
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,296
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
51,180
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,180
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
37,164
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,164
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,980
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member since July 1, 2008;
the shares were allocated before appointment to the Executive
Board
|
LTI Plan 2000
Beneficiaries under the LTI Plan 2000 could choose between
convertible bonds and stock options. The chief difference was in
the way the exercise or conversion price was determined. The
bond conversion price depends on the closing price of SAP stock
the day before the bond was issued, while the option strike
price varies with the performance of SAP stock over time against
the S&P North Software-Software Index (the successor of the
GSTI Software index).
90
The table below shows stock options held by members of the
Executive Board on December 31, 2008, granted in earlier
years under the LTI Plan 2000. The strike prices for LTI Plan
2000 stock options reflect the prices payable by an Executive
Board member for one SAP common share on exercise of the option
on December 31, 2008. The strike prices vary with the
performance of SAP stock over time against the S&P North
Software-Software Index. As a result of the issuance on
December 21, 2006, of bonus shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on exercise
each stock option now entitles its beneficiary to four shares.
For better comparability with the price of SAP stock since
implementation of the capital increase, the following table
shows not the number (quantity) of options but the number
(quantity) of shares to which they entitle the holder.
Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per share and
not per option. The number of shares shown in the table is four
times the number of options, and the strike price for an option
is four times the strike price per share shown in the table.
LTI Plan 2000 Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Exercised in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term in
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Day2
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,128
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,128
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,924
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,924
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,700
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,700
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
No options were exercised in 2008,
and the strike price is variable in accordance with the terms of
the plan being ascertained on the day an option is
exercised so there is no information to disclose
here.
|
|
(2)
|
|
No options were exercised in 2009,
so no strike price is shown.
|
91
The table below shows convertible bonds held by members of the
Executive Board on December 31, 2008, granted in earlier
years under the LTI Plan 2000. The strike prices for LTI Plan
2000 convertible bonds reflect the prices payable by an
Executive Board member for one SAP common share on conversion of
the bond. The strike prices are fixed and correspond to the
quoted price of one SAP share on the business day immediately
preceding the grant of the convertible bond. As a result of the
issuance on December 21, 2006, of bonus shares at a
one-to-three
ratio under a capital increase from corporate funds, on
conversion each bond now entitles its beneficiary to four
shares. For better comparability with the price of SAP stock
since implementation of the capital increase, the following
table shows not the number (quantity) of convertible bonds but
the number (quantity) of shares to which they entitle the
holder. Consequently, the strike prices shown are prices per
share and not per bond. The number of shares shown in the table
is four times the number of bonds, and the strike price for a
bond is four times the strike price per share shown in the table.
LTI Plan 2000 Convertible Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding on
|
|
|
Exercised in
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Quantity of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Day
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
89,700
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
83.67
|
|
|
|
95,400
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,400
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
72.58
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,700
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
47.81
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,862,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,862,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
Total
Expense for Share-Based Compensation
In the report year and the prior year total expense for the
share-based compensation plans of Executive Board members was
recorded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
1,047.5
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
690.3
|
|
Dr. Werner Brandt
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
601.4
|
|
Erwin
Gunst(1)
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Claus E. Heinrich
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
518.7
|
|
Bill
McDermott(1)
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerhard Oswald
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
601.4
|
|
John
Schwarz(2)
|
|
|
158.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Hagemann
Snabe(1)
|
|
|
95.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Peter Zencke
|
|
|
98.9
|
|
|
|
601.4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
947.5
|
|
|
|
4,060.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since July 1, 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Executive Board
since March 1, 2008.
|
STOCK HELD BY
EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBERS
No member of the Executive Board holds more than 1% of the
common stock of SAP AG. Members of the Executive Board held a
total of 88,527 SAP shares on December 31, 2008. On
December 31, 2007, members of the Executive Board held a
total of 86,515 SAP shares.
The table below shows transactions by Executive Board members
and persons closely associated with them notified to SAP
pursuant to the German Securities Trading Act, section 15a,
in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions in SAP Shares
|
|
|
Transaction Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Unit Price
|
|
Léo Apotheker (Co-CEO)
|
|
|
October 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
Stock purchase
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
26.35
|
|
Executive
Board: Other Information
We did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or enter
into any commitment for the benefit of, any member of our
Executive Board in 2008 or the previous year.
As far as the law permits, SAP AG and SAP AGs affiliated
companies in Germany and elsewhere indemnify and hold harmless
their respective directors and officers against and from the
claims of third parties. To this end, we maintain
directors and officers group liability insurance.
The policy is annual and is renewed from year to year. The
insurance covers the personal liability of the insured group for
financial loss caused by its managerial acts and omissions.
There is no individual deductible as envisaged in the German
Corporate Governance Code. We believe the motivation and
responsibility that the members of the Executive Board and
Supervisory Board bring to their duties would not be improved by
such a deductible element. For this reason, SAP regards a
deductible as unnecessary for the insured group.
93
Compensation for
Supervisory Board members
Compensation
System
Supervisory Board members compensation is governed by our
Articles of Incorporation, section 16. Each member of the
Supervisory Board receives, in addition to the reimbursement of
his or her expenses, compensation composed of fixed elements and
a variable element. The variable element depends on the dividend
paid by SAP on common shares.
The fixed element is 75,000 for the chairperson,
50,000 for the deputy chairperson, and 37,500 for
other members. For membership of a Supervisory Board committee,
members receive additional fixed compensation of 2,500
(provided that the relevant committee meets during the fiscal
year) and the chairperson of the committee receives 5,000.
The fixed remuneration element is due for payment after the end
of the fiscal year.
The variable compensation element is 8,000 for the
chairperson, 6,000 for the deputy chairperson, and
4,000 for the other members of the Supervisory Board for
each 0.01 by which the dividend distributed per share
exceeds 0.25. However, the aggregate compensation
excluding compensation for committee memberships must not exceed
200,000 for the chairperson, 150,000 for the deputy
chairperson, and 100,000 for other members.
Any member of the Supervisory Board having served for less than
the entire fiscal year receives one-twelfth of their respective
remuneration for each month of service commenced. This also
applies to the higher compensation levels for the chairperson
and deputy chairperson and to the additional compensation for
committee chairs and memberships.
94
Amount of
Compensation
Subject to the resolution on the appropriation of retained
earnings by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
May 19, 2009, the compensation paid to Supervisory Board
members in respect of fiscal year 2008 will be as set out in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
for Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
for Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Work
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Work
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. h.c. mult. Hasso Plattner (chairperson)
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
225.0
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
125.0
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
Lars Lamadé (deputy chairperson from May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
131.7
|
|
Pekka Ala-Pietilä
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
Thomas Bamberger (from May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
Panagiotis Bissiritsas (from May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
Willi Burbach
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
Helga Classen (deputy chairperson until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
123.3
|
|
Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Haarmann
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
Bernhard Koller (until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Peter Koop (from May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
Christiane Kuntz-Mayr (until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
Bernard Liautaud (from June 3, 2008)
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Dr. Gerhard Maier
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Dr. h.c. Hartmut Mehdorn
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Joachim Milberg (from
May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
71.7
|
|
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. August-Wilhelm Scheer (until
April 4, 2008)
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
Dr. Barbara Schennerlein (until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Dr. Erhard Schipporeit
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
107.5
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Stefan Schulz
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Dr. Dieter Spöri (until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Dr. h.c. Klaus Tschira (until May 10, 2007)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer (from May 10,
2007)
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
102.5
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
646.9
|
|
|
|
1,094.8
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
|
|
|
1,840.0
|
|
|
|
672.9
|
|
|
|
1,118.8
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
1,867.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, we reimburse to members of the Supervisory Board
their expenses and the value-added tax payable on their
compensation.
The total compensation of all Supervisory Board members in 2008
for work for SAP excluding compensation relating to the office
of Supervisory Board member was 1,050,300.
95
Long-Term
Incentives for the Supervisory Board
We do not offer members stock options or other share-based
compensation for their Supervisory Board work. Any stock options
or other share-based compensation received by employee-elected
members relate to their position as SAP employees and not to
their work on the Supervisory Board.
Supervisory
Board Members Shareholdings
See Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements in
ITEM 18. Financial Statements, which shows the
shareholdings of Supervisory Board members Hasso Plattner
(chairperson) and Klaus Tschira (who left the Supervisory Board
in May 2007), and the companies they control, on
December 31, 2008. No other member of the Supervisory Board
held more than 1% of the SAP AG common stock at the end of 2008
or of the previous year. Members of the Supervisory Board held a
total of 128,995,306 SAP shares on December 31, 2008. On
December 31, 2007, members of the Supervisory Board held a
total of 128,993,710 SAP shares.
The table below shows transactions by Supervisory Board members
and persons closely associated with them notified to SAP
pursuant to the German Securities Trading Act, section 15a,
in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions in SAP Shares
|
|
|
|
Transaction Date
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
Unit Price in
|
|
|
Dr. Elisabeth Strobl-Haarmann
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
Stock sale
|
|
|
|
4,490
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
July 4, 2008
|
|
|
|
Stock purchase
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
33.08
|
|
Supervisory
Board: Other Information
We did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or enter
into any commitment for the benefit of, any member of our
Supervisory Board in 2008 or the previous year.
Hasso Plattner, the chairperson of the Supervisory Board,
entered into a consulting contract with SAP after he joined the
Supervisory Board in May 2003. The contract does not provide for
any compensation. The only cost we incurred under the contract
was the reimbursement of expenses.
As far as the law permits, we indemnify Supervisory Board
members against, and hold them harmless from, claims brought by
third parties. To this end, we maintain directors and
officers group liability insurance. For more information
about this insurance, see the Executive Board: Other Information
section.
EMPLOYEES
(continuing operations)
As of December 31, 2008, we had 51,536 FTEs worldwide
(2007: 43,861; 2006: 39,198), which represented an increase of
17% from December 31, 2007, of which the acquisition of
Business Objects contributed 14%. Of the total headcount,
15,582 employees were based in Germany and 9,214 in the
United States.
Originally, we had planned to increase our workforce in 2008 by
4,000 FTEs (excluding additions through acquisitions). In
October 2008, in response to the downturn of the economy, we
implemented a head count freeze under which recruiting was
limited to very rare exceptions. In January 2009 we announced
our intention to reduce the number of positions globally to
48,500 by the end of the year, and to take advantage of any
attrition during this time to assist in meeting our year end
goal.
96
The following tables set forth the numbers of employees by
functional area and by geographic region as of December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 in terms of FTEs (All headcount figures are
based on continuing operations):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees as of December 31, continuing operations
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
FTEs
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
APJ
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
|
|
3,022
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
5,831
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
5,243
|
|
Service
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
12,785
|
|
|
|
6,336
|
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
11,518
|
|
Development
|
|
|
8,687
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
15,547
|
|
|
|
7,787
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
12,951
|
|
|
|
7,507
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
|
|
11,801
|
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
4,014
|
|
|
|
2,042
|
|
|
|
10,701
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
2,604
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
7,050
|
|
General & Administration
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP Group
|
|
|
26,825
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
51,536
|
|
|
|
23,654
|
|
|
|
10,629
|
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
43,861
|
|
|
|
22,339
|
|
|
|
9,109
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
39,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that hiring highly qualified professionals is
essential to build the foundation for our future success and
continued growth. Initial plans for 2008 called for 4,000 new
jobs to be created. The actual net FTEs increased by 7,675. Of
the total worldwide headcount increase in 2008, acquisitions
accounted for 6,491 FTE, the majority of which was in the
Americas region. The average number of FTE increased by 9,401
from 42,129 in 2007 to 51,530 in 2008. The percentage increases
were 27% in the Americas region, 13% in the EMEA region, and 18%
in the Asia Pacific Japan region. We filled 2,828 new positions
in the Americas region and 3,171 new positions in the EMEA
region in 2008. Of the 1,676 new positions in the Asia Pacific
Japan region, most were in India (753) and China (428).
Certain employees who are employed by SAP but who are not
currently working or who work part-time while finishing a
university degree are excluded from the above figures. Also,
certain temporary employees are not included in the above
figures. The number of such temporary employees is not material.
On a worldwide basis, we believe that our employee relations are
excellent. Employees of SAP France S.A. and Business Objects
S.A. are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
A German group works council with six members from the German
subsidiaries at SAPs headquarters in Walldorf represents
SAPs German employees. On the legal entity level, the SAP
AG works council represents the employees of the AG with 31
members, the employees of SAP Germany are represented by a works
council with 30 members. For different areas of co-determination
the entity-level works councils have elected committees. By law
the works council is entitled to consultation- and in some areas
to co-determination- rights concerning labor conditions at SAP
AG and SAP Germany. Therefore the implementation of some labor
and employment measures may take longer and be more costly than
in countries without a works council, but these processes offer
the possibility of a better acceptance and understanding of
measures by the employees. Other employee representatives
include the group works council currently having six members
(members of the works councils of SAP and SAP Germany), the
representatives of severely disabled persons in all entities and
on group level (Germany) and the spokes persons committee as the
representation of the executives.
Each of SAP France S.A and Business Objects S.A are represented
by a French works council. A French works council is responsible
for protecting the employees collective interests by
ensuring that management considers the interests of employees in
making decisions on behalf of the company. A French works
council is entitled to certain company information and to
consult with management on matters that are expected to have an
impact on company structure or on the employees it represents.
In addition, the employees of our subsidiaries SAP Spain and SAP
Belgium are also represented by works councils.
97
SHARE OWNERSHIP
Beneficial Ownership
of Shares
The ordinary shares beneficially owned by Hasso Plattner
(Chairperson of the Supervisory Board) and Klaus Tschira and
companies affiliated with the aforementioned individuals are
disclosed in Item 7. Major Shareholders and
Related-Party Transactions Major Shareholders.
We believe each of the other members of the Supervisory Board
and the Executive Board beneficially owns less than 1% of SAP
AGs ordinary shares as of March 9, 2009.
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION PLANS
SAP Stock Option
Plan 2002
At the 2002 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the SAP AG
shareholders approved the SAP SOP 2002. The SAP
SOP 2002 provided for the issuance of stock options to the
members of the SAP AG Executive Board, members of
subsidiaries Executive Boards and to eligible executives
and other top performers of SAP AG and its subsidiaries. The SAP
SOP 2002 Plan was designed to replace the LTI 2000 Plan
described below and was replaced in 2007 by the SOP 2007 Plan.
The last stock options under the SAP SOP 2002 Plan were
granted in 2006. See Note 27 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. Financial Statements for
a more detailed discussion.
By resolution of SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders held on May 10, 2007, the Executive Board of
SAP AG was authorized to acquire, on or before October 31,
2008, up to 120 million shares in the Company on the
condition that such share purchases, together with any
previously acquired shares, do not account for more than 10% of
SAP AGs capital stock. Such repurchased ordinary shares
may, among other things, be used to satisfy our obligations upon
conversion of the convertible bonds or exercise of the stock
options under the LTI 2000 Plan and our obligations upon the
exercise of stock options under the SAP SOP 2002. This
resolution replaced the resolution of the Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders of May 9, 2006, which authorized the
Executive Board to acquire on or before October 31, 2007,
up to 120 million shares in SAP to, among other things,
satisfy our obligations upon conversion of the convertible bonds
or exercise of the stock options under the LTI 2000 Plan and the
exercise of stock options under the SAP SOP 2002. These
repurchases of ordinary shares are expected to reduce the
dilutive effects on earnings per share. As of March 9,
2009, we have repurchased 14,835 thousand ordinary shares and
issued them to stock option holders who have exercised stock
options under the SAP SOP 2002. The number of repurchased
shares was adjusted to reflect the December 15,
2006 share issuance presented as a share split.
Long Term Incentive
2000 Plan
On January 18, 2000 SAPs shareholders approved the
LTI 2000 Plan. The LTI 2000 Plan is a share-based compensation
program, providing members of the SAP AG Executive Board,
members of subsidiaries executive boards and selected
employees a choice between convertible bonds, stock options, or
a 50% mixture of each. Under the LTI 2000 Plan, 15 million
convertible bonds or 18.75 million stock options were
originally authorized, and a maximum of 18.75 million
ordinary shares (not adjusted for the December 15,
2006 share issuance presented as a share split) were
authorized pursuant to a contingent capital increase for
issuance upon conversion of the convertible bonds and exercise
of the stock options granted under the LTI 2000 Plan. Upon
conversion of the convertible bonds and exercise of the stock
options, we will be required to provide ordinary shares in
return for payment of the conversion or exercise price, as the
case may be, which will be less than the market price for the
ordinary shares at the time of such conversion or exercise.
By resolution of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
May 3, 2002, the authorization to issue convertible bonds
and stock options under the LTI 2000 Plan, to the extent not yet
made use of, was revoked. In
98
addition, the contingent capital for issuance upon conversion of
the convertible bonds and exercise of the stock options granted
under the LTI 2000 Plan was reduced to the amount necessary to
secure all convertible bonds and stock options already granted
under the LTI 2000 Plan. In total SAP AG issued approximately
8.68 million convertible bonds and approximately
3.63 million stock options under the LTI 2000 Plan.
The conversion price of the convertible bonds for four SAP AG
ordinary shares will equal the closing price of the SAP AG
ordinary share quoted in the Xetra trading system (or any
successor system) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange on the last
trading day prior to the issue of the respective convertible
bond (the day on which SAP AG or the credit institution managing
the issue on behalf of SAP AG accepts the beneficiarys
subscription). Upon the exercise of the conversion rights, an
additional payment is due for each four shares equal to the
amount by which the conversion price of the shares exceeds the
nominal amount of the converted bond of 1 for each
convertible bond, which was payable upon granting of the
convertible bonds and which is mandatory according to German
Stock Corporation Law.
The exercise price of the stock options issued under the LTI
2000 Plan for one SAP AG ordinary share is calculated by
reference to the outperformance. The outperformance is the
percentage points by which the performance of the SAP AG
ordinary share exceeds the performance of the S&P North
Software
Indextm
(which is the successor of the GSTI Software Index). The initial
value for determining the performance by the SAP AG ordinary
shares is the closing price of the SAP AG ordinary shares quoted
in the Xetra trading system (or any successor system) of the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange on the last trading day prior to the
issue of the stock option (the day on which SAP AG or the credit
institution managing the issue for SAP AG accepts the
beneficiarys subscription). The initial value for
determining the performance of the reference index is the last
value recorded for the reference index on the same trading day
on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The final value for
determining the performance of the SAP AG ordinary share is the
closing price of SAPs ordinary shares quoted in the Xetra
trading system (or any successor system) of the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange on the latest trading day prior to exercise of the
subscription right attaching to the stock option. The final
value for determining the performance of the reference index is
the last value of the reference index on the same trading day on
the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The initial value and the
final value of the reference index will be translated from US$
to euro using the noon-fixing rate as published each day by the
European Central Bank. Performance is the price change measured
between the initial value and the final value, expressed as
percentage points. In calculating the performance of the SAP AG
ordinary share, the same adjustment rules for dividend payments,
subscription rights, and other special rights are applied to the
stock exchange prices used as are applied in determining the
relevant reference index. The exercise price for one stock
option is calculated by reference to the outperformance. The
outperformance is the percentage points by which the performance
of the SAP AG ordinary share exceeds the performance of the
reference index, as follows: The exercise price is the final
value as determined above, less the product of the initial value
as determined above and the outperformance.
Beneficiaries under the LTI 2000 Plan may not exercise their
conversion or subscription rights until a vesting period has
elapsed. The vesting period for 33% of such rights ends two
years after the issue date, for the next 33% three years after
the issue date and for the balance four years after the issue
date. Convertible bonds and stock options under the LTI 2000
Plan have a term of 10 years from the issue date, after
which they become void.
As of March 9, 2009, we have repurchased 7,216 thousand
ordinary shares and issued them to stock option holders who have
exercised stock options under the LTI 2000 Plan. See the
preceding section, SAP Stock Option Plan 2002, for further
discussions regarding shares we are authorized to repurchase to
satisfy our obligations under the LTI 2000 Plan and the SAP
SOP 2002.
Stock Appreciation
Rights (STAR) Plans
In March and April 2008, we granted approximately
18.5 million (2007: 18.7 million; 2006:
14.1 million) stock appreciation rights to selected
employees who are not participants in the LTI 2000 Plan or SAP
SOP 2002. The plan does not involve the issue or grant of
options or shares. See Note 27 to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 18. Financial
Statements for a more detailed discussion.
99
Incentive Plan 2010
In January 2008 and January 2007 we granted 0.1 and
0.7 million stock appreciation rights (rights)
to our top executives under the Incentive Plan 2010
respectively. In March 2006, we granted 0.7 million rights
to the Executive Board members under the Incentive Plan 2010.
The plan provides for a maximum payout of approximately
100 million for the tranche granted to the Executive
Board members and approximately another 100 million
for the tranche granted to the top executives, provided that the
market capitalization of SAP AG doubles by December 31,
2010. Therefore, the maximum payout for the stock appreciation
rights that have been granted to date under this plan amounts to
approximately 200 million in the aggregate. The plan
does not involve the issue or grant of options or shares. See
Note 27 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for a more
detailed discussion.
Virtual Stock Option
Plan 2007
In the first half of 2008 as well as in March 2007 we granted
8.7 and 7.0 million virtual stock options respectively
(stock appreciation rights, SOP 2007). The
plans terms envisage cash settlement only, and it is
available to members of the SAP AG Executive Board, members of
subsidiaries executive boards and eligible executives and
other top performers of SAP AG and its subsidiaries. The program
replaced the SAP SOP 2002 Plan, described above. The plan
does not involve the issue or grant of options or shares. See
Note 27 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for a more
detailed discussion.
German Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
We maintain two employee stock purchase plans for our German
employees: (i) an ongoing payroll deduction plan (the
German Payroll Deduction Plan) and (ii) an
annual purchase plan (the German Annual Purchase
Plan). Under the German Payroll Deduction Plan, an
eligible German employee is able to purchase ordinary shares
through payroll deductions of up to 10% of the gross monthly
salary of the employee and SAP contributions of 15% of the
ordinary share purchase price as well as the assumption of
ancillary purchase expenses. As soon as the amount available for
an employee is sufficient together with our contribution to
purchase an ordinary share, such purchase is effected at the
market price and credited to the employees account. The
acquired shares are not subject to a holding period. Under the
German Annual Purchase Plan, eligible German employees may buy a
determined number of ordinary shares per year on a set date.
Under such plan, SAP contributes 260 per year. The
employee provides any additional amounts, if necessary, to avoid
the purchase of fractional shares. The acquired shares are
transferred to an individual account of the participating
employee, and they are not subject to a holding period.
Employees must elect each year to participate in the German
Annual Purchase Plan.
U.S. Employee Stock
Purchase Plans
During 2008 we maintained two plans which allow for our
U.S. employees to acquire equity securities of SAP AG as
follows: (i) an employee non-discount purchase plan (the
U.S. Non-discount Plan); and (ii) the ADR
Stock Fund (the ADR Stock Fund) available under the
SAP America, Inc. 401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan). Under
the U.S. Non-discount Plan, an administrator makes open
market purchases of ADRs for the accounts of participating
employees on a semi-monthly basis. Such purchases are made out
of amounts deducted from each participating employees
eligible compensation. SAP does not make any contributions in
connection with the U.S. Non-discount Plan. The ADR Stock
Fund was introduced in 2000 as an investment option provided to
certain U.S. employees under the 401(k) Plan. For 2007,
U.S. employees could contribute up to 25% of their pretax
and after tax payroll under the 401(k) Plan, and we would
contribute 50% of the contributed amounts up to 6% of the pretax
and after tax pay not to exceed $6,600 per year. Both employee
and employer contributions are submitted to a plan administrator
who provides various investment fund options at the election of
each participant.
100
Other Foreign Stock
Purchase Plans
Although we maintain and are in the process of introducing
various employee stock purchase plans similar to our German and
U.S. plans in the majority of our remaining foreign
subsidiaries, the combined impact of these plans on our results
of operations, net income and cash flows is not material.
Certain employees of Business Objects companies held equity
awards giving rights to Business Objects shares (stock options
and Restricted Stock Unit (RSU)) at the time of the acquisition
by SAP. Due to a squeeze-out initiated by SAP France, the
Business Objects shares were no longer publicly traded as of
February 18, 2008. As part of the acquisition, the equity
awards of the Business Objects employees were supplemented with
certain mechanisms to allow the employees to cash out their
equity awards, either by receiving cash instead of Business
Objects shares (cash payment mechanism or CPM) or by receiving
Business Objects shares that subsequently must be tendered to
SAP (liquidity agreement mechanism or LAM) in accordance with
local regulations. The new rights closely mirrored the economics
of the previous entitlements. See Note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements, for a more detailed discussion.
ITEM 7. MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
The share capital of SAP AG consists of ordinary shares, which
are issued only in bearer form. Accordingly, SAP AG generally
has no way of determining who its shareholders are or how many
shares a particular shareholder owns. SAPs ordinary shares
are traded in the United States by means of ADRs. Each ADR
currently represents one SAP ordinary share. On March 9,
2009, based upon information provided by the ADR depositary, the
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, there were
93,339,185ADRs held of record by 17,245 registered holders. The
ordinary shares underlying such ADRs represented 7.61% of the
then-outstanding ordinary shares (including treasury stock).
Because SAPs ordinary shares are issued in bearer form
only, we are unable to determine the number of ordinary shares
directly held by persons with U.S. addresses.
However, under Section 21 of the German Securities Trading
Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz), holders of voting
securities of a German company admitted to official trading on a
stock exchange within the European Union or the European
Economic Area are obligated to notify the issuer of the
securities of the level of their holdings whenever such holdings
reach, exceed or fall below certain thresholds, which have been
set at 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75% of the
issuers outstanding voting rights.
101
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of the ordinary shares to the extent known
to SAP as of March 9, 2009 of: (i) each person or
group known by SAP AG to own beneficially 5% or more of the
outstanding ordinary shares; and (ii) the beneficial
ownership of all members of the Supervisory Board and all
members of the Executive Board, individually and as a group, in
each case as reported to SAP AG by such persons. There was, as
far as we are able to tell given the nature of our shares, no
significant change in the percentage ownership held by any major
shareholder during the past three years. None of the major
shareholders have special voting rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Major Shareholders
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Dietmar Hopp,
collectively(1)
|
|
|
110,273,200
|
|
|
|
8.996
|
%
|
Hasso Plattner, Chairperson Supervisory Board,
collectively(2)
|
|
|
128,987,982
|
|
|
|
10.522
|
%
|
Klaus Tschira,
collectively(3)
|
|
|
109,754,305
|
|
|
|
8.953
|
%
|
Executive Board Members as a group (7 persons)
|
|
|
88,527
|
|
|
|
0.007
|
%
|
Supervisory Board Members as a group (16 persons)
|
|
|
128,994,969
|
|
|
|
10.523
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Board Members and Supervisory Board Members as a
group (23 persons)
|
|
|
129,083,496
|
|
|
|
10.530
|
%
|
Options and convertible bonds that are vested and exercisable
within 60 days of March 9, 2009, held by Executive
Board Members and Supervisory Board Members,
collectively(4)
|
|
|
914,997
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes Dietmar Hopp Stiftung GmbH and DH Besitzgesellschaft
mbH & Co. KG in which Dietmar Hopp exercises sole
voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes Hasso Plattner Förderstiftung gGmbH and Hasso
Plattner GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs-KG in which Hasso
Plattner exercises sole voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes Klaus Tschira Stiftung gGmbH and Dr. h. c. Tschira
Beteiligungs GmbH & Co. KG in which Klaus Tschira
exercises sole voting and dispositive power.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 511,147 stock options and 403,850 convertible bonds.
Each of these stock options and convertible bonds entitles the
holder, if exercised or converted, to four SAP AG ordinary
shares.
|
We at present have no knowledge about any arrangements, the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change
in control of the company.
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
See Note 30 in Item 18. Financial
Statements for information on related-party transactions.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See Item 18. Financial Statements and pages F-1
through F-95
OTHER FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted
or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business.
Although the outcome of such proceedings and claims cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the
outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse
effect on our
102
business, results of operations, financial position or cash
flows. Any litigation, however, involves potential risk and
potentially significant litigation costs, and therefore there
can be no assurance that any litigation which is now pending or
which may arise in the future would not have such a material
adverse effect on our business, financial position, income or
cash flows.
See a detailed discussion of our legal proceedings in
Note 24 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements.
Dividend Policy
Dividends are jointly proposed by SAP AGs Supervisory
Board and Executive Board based on SAP AGs year-end
stand-alone financial statements, subject to approval at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, and are officially
declared for the prior year at SAP AGs Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders. SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders usually convenes during the second quarter of each
year. Since ordinary shares are in bearer form, dividends are
usually remitted to the custodian bank on behalf of the
shareholder within one business day following the Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders. Record holders of the ADRs on the
dividend record date will be entitled to receive payment of the
dividend declared in respect of the year for which it is
declared. Cash dividends payable to such holders will be paid to
the Depositary in euro and, subject to certain exceptions, will
be converted by the Depositary into U.S. dollars. The
amount of dividends received by holders of ADRs may be affected
by fluctuations in exchange rates. See Item 3. Key
Information Exchange Rates. The timing and
amount of future dividend payments will depend upon our future
earnings, capital needs and other relevant factors.
Significant Changes
We acquired substantially all outstanding securities of Business
Objects in 2008. In connection with the acquisition, we entered
into a 5 billion credit facility in October 2007
(subsequently reduced to 4.45 billion as of
December 31, 2007 and further reduced to
2.95 billion in February 2008). Funds available under
the facility were not drawn until the first quarter of 2008. As
of March 9, 2009, we had 2.3 billion drawn on
this credit facility.
To enable us to adapt our size to todays market conditions
and the broader impact of the global recession, in January 2009
we announced our intention to reduce the number of positions
globally to 48,500 by the end of the year, and to take advantage
of any attrition during this time to assist in meeting our year
end goal.
ITEM 9. THE
OFFER AND LISTING
GENERAL
Our ordinary shares are officially listed on the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange, the Berlin Stock Exchange and the Stuttgart Stock
Exchange. In addition, the ordinary shares are traded in the
over-the-counter markets (Freiverkehr) in Germany. The
principal trading market for the ordinary shares is Xetra, the
electronic dealing platform of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The
ordinary shares are issued only in bearer form.
On December 15, 2006, the resolution of the May 9,
2006 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to increase the
Companys subscribed capital from corporate funds (retained
earnings and APIC) became effective. For each share they already
held, SAP AG shareholders received three additional shares after
the close of stock exchange business on December 20, 2006.
The Companys stock exchange listing was amended
accordingly with effect from December 21, 2006. The new
shares resulting from the subscribed capital increase were
automatically credited to shareholders custody accounts.
For financial statement purposes, the issuance of the additional
shares is presented as a share split. Accordingly, earnings per
share information for years prior to 2006 presented throughout
this annual report have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect
the December 15, 2006 share issuance. Other prior year
share information, for example shares authorized, issued and
outstanding, have not been retrospectively adjusted to reflect
the December 15, 2006 share issuance because
Section 8 of the German
103
Stock Corporation Act (AktG) requires that the
Companys shares maintain a per-share nominal value of at
least 1, and the Companys per-share nominal value of
its issued and outstanding shares was already 1 before the
December 15, 2006 share issuance.
With the change in share capital in December 2006 the previous
ratio between the ADRs and the underlying ordinary shares of
4:1, meaning that four SAP ADRs were the equivalent of one SAP
AG ordinary share, changed to 1:1, meaning that one SAP ADR
represents one SAP ordinary share. Holders of SAP ADRs did not
receive additional ADRs as a result of the capital increase.
On September 7, 2007, the Executive Board of SAP AG
announced that it decided to decrease the Companys capital
stock by canceling 23,000,000 treasury shares, representing 1.8%
of the capital stock before this corporate action.
On September 3, 2008, the Executive Board of SAP AG
announced that it decided to decrease the Companys capital
stock by canceling 21,000,000 treasury shares, representing 1.7%
of the capital stock before this corporate action.
As of December 31, 2008 the share capital of SAP AG was
1,225,762,900 representing 1,225,762,900 no-par ordinary
shares.
ADRs representing SAP AG ordinary shares are listed on the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol
SAP and currently each represents one ordinary share.
104
TRADING ON THE
FRANKFURT STOCK EXCHANGE AND THE NYSE
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high
and low closing sales prices for the ordinary shares on the
Xetra trading System of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, as
provided by Reuters, together with the closing highs and lows of
the DAX, and the high and low closing sales prices for the ADRs
on the NYSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
Share(1)
|
|
|
DAX(2)
|
|
|
Price per ADR
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
In US$
|
|
|
Annual Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
4,261.79
|
|
|
|
3,646.99
|
|
|
|
45.45
|
|
|
|
35.50
|
|
2005
|
|
|
38.95
|
|
|
|
28.63
|
|
|
|
5,458.58
|
|
|
|
4,178.10
|
|
|
|
46.43
|
|
|
|
36.96
|
|
2006
|
|
|
46.86
|
|
|
|
34.56
|
|
|
|
6,611.81
|
|
|
|
5,292.14
|
|
|
|
57.00
|
|
|
|
43.57
|
|
2007
|
|
|
42.27
|
|
|
|
33.37
|
|
|
|
8,105.69
|
|
|
|
6,447.70
|
|
|
|
59.86
|
|
|
|
44.45
|
|
2008
|
|
|
39,93
|
|
|
|
23,45
|
|
|
|
7,949.11
|
|
|
|
4,127.41
|
|
|
|
58.98
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
Quarterly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
42.27
|
|
|
|
33.37
|
|
|
|
7,027.59
|
|
|
|
6,447.70
|
|
|
|
55.71
|
|
|
|
44.45
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
38.15
|
|
|
|
33.65
|
|
|
|
8,090.49
|
|
|
|
6,937.17
|
|
|
|
51.35
|
|
|
|
45.08
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
41.76
|
|
|
|
36.61
|
|
|
|
8,105.69
|
|
|
|
7,270.07
|
|
|
|
58.67
|
|
|
|
49.85
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
41.66
|
|
|
|
34.31
|
|
|
|
8,076.12
|
|
|
|
7,511.97
|
|
|
|
59.86
|
|
|
|
50.05
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
34.88
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
|
|
|
7,949.11
|
|
|
|
6.182,30
|
|
|
|
51.93
|
|
|
|
45.77
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
35.52
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
7,225.94
|
|
|
|
6,418.32
|
|
|
|
55.20
|
|
|
|
48.72
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.93
|
|
|
|
32.38
|
|
|
|
6,609.63
|
|
|
|
5,807.08
|
|
|
|
58.98
|
|
|
|
51.40
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
36.98
|
|
|
|
23.45
|
|
|
|
5,806.33
|
|
|
|
4,127.41
|
|
|
|
51.85
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
Monthly Highs and Lows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
|
|
37.26
|
|
|
|
32.38
|
|
|
|
6,536.09
|
|
|
|
6,081.70
|
|
|
|
58.98
|
|
|
|
51.40
|
|
August
|
|
|
38.71
|
|
|
|
37.00
|
|
|
|
6,609.63
|
|
|
|
6,236.96
|
|
|
|
58.56
|
|
|
|
55.71
|
|
September
|
|
|
39.93
|
|
|
|
36.97
|
|
|
|
6,518.47
|
|
|
|
5,807.08
|
|
|
|
58.13
|
|
|
|
52.19
|
|
October
|
|
|
36.98
|
|
|
|
23.45
|
|
|
|
5,806.33
|
|
|
|
4,295.67
|
|
|
|
51.85
|
|
|
|
30.22
|
|
November
|
|
|
29.44
|
|
|
|
23.80
|
|
|
|
5,278.04
|
|
|
|
4,127.41
|
|
|
|
38.38
|
|
|
|
29.70
|
|
December
|
|
|
27.74
|
|
|
|
24.10
|
|
|
|
4,810.20
|
|
|
|
4,381.47
|
|
|
|
36.27
|
|
|
|
32.21
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
27.85
|
|
|
|
25.91
|
|
|
|
5,026.31
|
|
|
|
4,178.94
|
|
|
|
37.62
|
|
|
|
33.30
|
|
February
|
|
|
29.64
|
|
|
|
25.52
|
|
|
|
4,666.82
|
|
|
|
3,843.74
|
|
|
|
38.61
|
|
|
|
32.14
|
|
March (through March 9, 2009)
|
|
|
26.43
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
3,890.94
|
|
|
|
3,666.41
|
|
|
|
33.11
|
|
|
|
31.69
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Share prices for 2006 and prior are retrospectively adjusted for
the effect of the fourfold increase in the number of shares
resulting from the capital increase which became effective
December 15, 2006 (see the immediately preceding section
General for more detail of the share
increase).
|
|
(2)
|
The DAX is a continuously updated, capital-weighted performance
index of 30 German blue chip companies. In principle, the shares
included in the DAX are selected on the basis of their stock
exchange turnover and the issuers market capitalization.
Adjustments to the DAX are made for capital changes,
subscription rights and dividends.
|
On March 9, 2009, the closing sales price per ordinary
share on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange was 25.59 as
provided by Reuters, and the closing sales price per ADR on the
NYSE was US$31.78, as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape.
105
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION
Organization and
Register
SAP AG is a stock corporation organized in the Federal Republic
of Germany under the Stock Corporation Act
(Aktiengesetz). SAP AG is registered in the Commercial
Register (Handelsregister) at the Lower Court of
Mannheim, Germany, under the entry number HRB
350269. SAP AG publishes its official notices in the
Internet version of the Federal Gazette
(www.ebundesanzeiger.de).
Objectives and
purposes
Section 2 of SAP AGs Articles of Incorporation states
that our objectives involve, directly or indirectly, the
development, production and marketing of products and the
provision of services in the field of information technology,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
developing and marketing integrated product and service
solutions for
e-commerce;
|
|
|
|
developing software for information technology and the licensing
of its use to others;
|
|
|
|
organization and deployment consulting, as well as user
training, for
e-commerce
and other software solutions;
|
|
|
|
selling, leasing, renting and arranging the procurement and
provision of all other forms of use of information technology
systems and related equipment; and
|
|
|
|
making capital investments in enterprises active in the field of
information technology to promote the opening and advancement of
international markets in the field of information technology.
|
SAP AG is authorized to act in all the business areas listed
above and to delegate such activities to affiliated enterprises
within the meaning of the German Stock Corporation Act; in
particular SAP AG is authorized to delegate its business in
whole or in part to such enterprises. SAP AG is authorized to
establish branch offices in Germany and other countries, as well
as to form, acquire or invest in other companies of the same or
related kind and to enter into collaboration and joint venture
agreements. SAP AG is further authorized to invest in
enterprises of all kinds principally for the purpose of placing
financial resources. SAP AG is authorized to dispose of
investments, to consolidate the management of enterprises in
which it participates, to enter into affiliation agreements with
such enterprises, or to do no more than manage its shareholdings.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Introduction
The primary source of law relating to corporate governance of a
German stock corporation is the German Stock Corporation Act.
Other relevant rules impacting corporate governance are
contained in the German Security Trading Act, Securities
Purchase and Takeover Act, Stock Exchange Admission Regulations,
Commercial Code and other statutes. In addition to these
mandatory rules, in February 2002, a government commission
appointed by the German Minister of Justice adopted the German
Corporate Governance Code (GCGC), which has since
been amended. The GCGC consists of recommended corporate
governance standards. Section 161 of the Stock Corporation
Act, however, requires the executive board and the supervisory
board of exchange-listed companies, such as SAP AG, to declare
annually that the recommendations set forth in the GCGC have
been and are being complied with, or which of the
recommendations are not being applied. SAP AG has disclosed
deviations from the GCGC in the above-mentioned declaration of
compliance on a yearly basis
106
since 2002 (See
www.sap.com/about/governance/statutes/declarationofimplementation.epx).
See Item 16G. Differences in Corporate Governance
Practices for additional information on our corporate
governance practices.
In December 2001, as one of the first German listed companies to
do so, SAP published its own corporate governance
rules SAPs Principles of Corporate
Governance. Since the adoption of the GCGC in 2002, SAP
has adjusted its own principles according to new national and
international corporate governance standards as appropriate and
as far as they were applicable to SAP. Due to these continual
amendments, SAPs Principles of Corporate Governance and
the applicable German Law together with the GCGC have come to
cover largely the same content. In October 2007, SAP therefore
decided to discontinue its own Principles of Corporate
Governance and instead makes reference to the GCGC as the basis
of its corporate governance.
As a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, we are in compliance with the applicable regulations
of the Corporate Governance Rules of the New York Stock Exchange
as they apply to foreign private issuers.
The Global Compliance Office (GCO), an extension of SAPs
Global Legal Department, was created by the SAP Executive Board
in 2006 to oversee and coordinate legal and regulatory policy
compliance for the SAP Group companies. Effective March 1,
2007, the Company appointed a new Chief Global Compliance
Officer who reports to the General Counsel, and also has direct
communication channels and reporting obligations to the
Executive Board and the Audit Committee of the Supervisory
Board. The GCO manages a network of more than 100 local
subsidiary Compliance Officers who act as the point of contact
for local questions or issues under the SAP Code of Business
Conduct for employees. The GCO provides training and
communication to SAP employees to raise awareness and
understanding of legal and regulatory compliance policies.
Employee help lines are also supported in each region where
questions can be raised or questionable conduct can be
reported without fear of repercussion.
SAP AG, as a German stock corporation, is governed by three
separate bodies: the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board and
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. Their rules are
defined by German law and by SAPs Articles of
Incorporation (Satzung) and may be briefly summarized as
follows:
The Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board appoints and removes the members of the
Executive Board and oversees and advises the management of the
corporation. At regular intervals it meets to discuss current
business as well as business development and planning. The SAP
Executive Board must consult with the Supervisory Board
concerning the corporate strategy, which is developed by the
Executive Board. The Supervisory Board must also approve the
annual budget of SAP upon submission by the Executive Board and
certain subsequent deviations from the approved budget. The
Supervisory Board is also responsible for representing SAP AG in
transactions between SAP AG and Executive Board members.
The Supervisory Board, based on a recommendation by its Audit
Committee, provides its proposal for the election of the
independent public accountant to the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders. Prior to submitting this proposal and in
accordance with the GCGC, the Supervisory Board must obtain a
statement from the proposed independent public accountant
confirming its independence. The Supervisory Board is also
responsible for monitoring the auditors continued
independence.
The German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz) requires supervisory boards of
corporations with more than 2,000 employees to consist of
an equal number of representatives of the shareholders and
representatives of the employees. The minimum total number of
supervisory board members, and thus the minimum number of
shareholder representatives and employee representatives, is
legally fixed and depends on the number of employees employed by
the corporation and its German subsidiaries. Our Supervisory
Board currently consists of sixteen members, of which eight
members have been elected by SAP AGs shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and eight members which
have been elected by the employees of companies of the SAP Group
having their registered office in Germany.
107
Any Supervisory Board member elected by the shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders may be removed by
three-quarters of the votes cast at the Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders. Any Supervisory Board member elected by the
employees may be removed by three quarters of the votes cast by
the employees of companies of the SAP Group having their
registered office in Germany.
The Supervisory Board elects a chairperson and a deputy
chairperson among its members by a majority of vote of its
members. If such majority is not reached on the first vote, the
chairperson will be chosen solely by the members elected by the
shareholders and the deputy chairperson will be chosen solely by
the members elected by the employees. Unless otherwise provided
by law, the Supervisory Board acts by simple majority. In the
case of any deadlock the chairperson has the deciding vote.
The members of the Supervisory Board cannot be elected for a
longer term than approximately 5 years. The term expires at
the close of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders giving
its formal approval of the acts of Supervisory Board and
Executive Board in the fourth fiscal year following the year in
which the Supervisory Board was elected unless the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders specifies a shorter term of
office when electing individual members of the Supervisory Board
or the entire Supervisory Board. Re-election is possible. The
Supervisory Board normally meets four times a year. The
remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board is
determined by the Articles of Incorporation.
As stipulated in the GCGC, an adequate number of our Supervisory
Board members are independent. To be considered for appointment
to the Supervisory Board and for as long as they serve, members
must comply with certain criteria concerning independence,
conflicts of interest and multiple memberships of management,
supervisory and other governing bodies. They must be loyal to
SAP in their conduct and must not accept any position in
companies that are in competition with SAP. Members are subject
to the insider trading prohibitions and the respective
directors dealing rules of the German Securities Trading
Act. A member of the Supervisory Board may not vote on matters
relating to certain contractual agreements between such member
and SAP AG. Further, as the compensation of the Supervisory
Board members is laid down in the Articles of Incorporation,
Supervisory Board members are unable to vote on their own
compensation.
The Supervisory Board may appoint committees from among its
members and may, to the extent permitted by law, entrust such
committees with the authority to make decisions. Currently the
Supervisory Board maintains the following committees:
The focus of the Audit Committee
(Prüfungsausschuss) is the oversight of
SAPs external financial reporting (including internal
controls over financial reporting) as well as SAPs risk
management and compliance matters. Among the tasks of the Audit
Committee are the discussion of SAPs quarterly and year
end financial reporting prepared under German and
U.S. regulations, including SAPs Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
The Audit Committee proposes the appointment of the external
auditor and its compensation to the Supervisory Board,
determines focus audit areas, discusses critical accounting
policies with and reviews the audit reports issued and audit
issues identified by the auditor and monitors the auditors
independence. Both SAPs Internal Audit Department and
SAPs Global Compliance Office (GCO) report upon request or
at the occurrence of certain findings, but in any case at least
once a year, directly to the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has established procedures regarding the
prior approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by
our independent auditor. See Item 16C. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services for details. Furthermore the
Audit Committee monitors the efficiency of our internal risk
management and other monitoring processes that are or need to be
established.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of 4 members: Erhard
Schipporeit, Thomas Bamberger, Gerhard Maier and Joachim
Milberg. The Supervisory Board has determined Erhard Schipporeit
to be an audit committee financial expert as defined by the
regulations of the Commission issued under Section 407 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. See Item 16A. Audit Committee
Financial Expert for details. He is also the chairperson
of the Audit Committee.
108
The General Committee (Präsidialausschuss)
coordinates the Supervisory Board agenda, meetings and deals
with corporate governance issues. Furthermore, it was assigned
the authority to grant Virtual SAP SOP 2007/Grant 2008
stock options to all recipients with the exception of Executive
Board members.
The Compensation Committee (Personalausschuss) is
responsible for concluding employment contracts with and for the
arrangement of the remuneration of Executive Board members. It
prepares proposals for the Executive Board compensation system
including the main contract elements for approval and regular
review by the full Supervisory Board and also grants Virtual SAP
SOP 2007/Grant 2008 stock options to Executive Board
members.
The Finance and Investment Committee (Finanz- und
Investitionsausschuss) addresses general financing issues.
Furthermore, it regularly discusses venture capital investments
and other equity investments with the Executive Board and
reports to the Supervisory Board on such investments. It is also
responsible for the approval of such investments if the
individual investment amount exceeds certain specified limits.
Required by the German Co-determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), the Mediation Committee
(Vermittlungsausschuss) convenes only if the two-thirds
majority required for appointing/revoking the appointment of
Executive Board members is not attained. This committee has
never held a meeting in SAP AGs history.
The Strategy and Technology Committee (Strategie- und
Technologieausschuss) monitors technology transactions and
provides the Supervisory Board with in-depth technical advice.
The Nomination Committee (Nominierungsausschuss) is
exclusively composed of shareholder representatives and is
responsible for identifying suitable candidates for membership
of the Supervisory Board for recommendation to the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
The Special Committee (Sonderausschuss),
established on June 3, 2008, is tasked with coordinating
and managing the Supervisory Boards external legal
advisors concerned with the investigation and analysis of the
facts in connection with the legal action brought by Oracle
Corporation.
The duties, procedures and committees of the Supervisory Board
are specified in their respective bylaws which reflect the
requirements of the German Stock Corporation Act and the GCGC.
Major decisions of the Executive Board require Supervisory Board
approval.
According to the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SAP does
not grant loans to the members of the Executive Board or the
Supervisory Board.
The Executive Board
The Executive Board manages the Companys business, is
responsible for preparing its strategy and represents it in
dealings with third parties. The Executive Board reports
regularly to the Supervisory Board about SAP operations and
business strategies and prepares special reports upon request. A
person may not serve on the Executive Board and on the
Supervisory Board at the same time.
The Executive Board and the Supervisory Board must cooperate
closely for the benefit of the Company. Without being asked, the
Executive Board must provide to the Supervisory Board regular,
prompt and comprehensive information about all of the essential
issues affecting the SAP Groups business progress and its
potential business risks. Furthermore, the Executive Board must
maintain regular contact with the chairperson of the Supervisory
Board. The Executive Board must inform the chairperson of the
Supervisory Board promptly about exceptional events that are of
significance to SAPs business. The chairperson must inform
the Supervisory Board accordingly.
Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, the Executive Board
must consist of at least 2 members. Currently, SAP AGs
Executive Board is composed of 9 members. Any 2 members of the
Executive Board jointly or one member of the Executive Board and
the holder of a special power of attorney (Prokurist)
jointly may legally represent SAP AG. The Supervisory Board
appoints each member of the Executive Board for a maximum term
of 5 years, with the possibility of re-appointment. Under
certain circumstances, a member of the Executive
109
Board may be removed by the Supervisory Board prior to the
expiration of that members term. A member of the Executive
Board may not vote on matters relating to certain contractual
agreements between such member and SAP AG, and may be liable to
SAP AG if such member has a material interest in any contractual
agreement between SAP and a third party which was not disclosed
to and approved by the Supervisory Board. Further, as the
compensation of the Executive Board members is set by the
Supervisory Board, Executive Board members are unable to vote on
their own compensation.
Under German law SAP AGs Supervisory Board members and
Executive Board members have a duty of loyalty and care towards
SAP AG. They must exercise the standard of care of a prudent and
diligent businessman and bear the burden of proving they did so
if their actions are contested. Both bodies must consider the
interest of SAP AG shareholders and our employees and, to some
extent, the common interest. Those who violate their duties may
be held jointly and severally liable for any resulting damages,
unless they acted pursuant to a lawful resolution of the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
SAP has implemented a Code of Business Conduct for employees
covering the following topics: conflict of interest, personal
gain, bribery and corruption, confidentiality, financial
concerns, conduct with customers, ventures, competitors and
partners and trading in shares (addressing insider trading
concerns). The employee code is equally applicable to managers
and members of the Executive Board. See Item 16B.
Code of Ethics for details.
Under German law the Executive Board of SAP AG has to assess all
major risks for the SAP Group. In addition, all measures taken
by management to reduce and handle the risks have to be
documented. Therefore, SAPs management has adopted
suitable measures such as implementing an enterprise-wide
monitoring system to ensure that adverse developments
endangering the corporate standing are recognized at a
reasonably early point in time.
The Annual General
Meeting of Shareholders
Shareholders of the Company exercise their voting rights at
shareholders meetings. The Executive Board calls the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which must take place
within the first eight months of each fiscal year. The
Supervisory Board or the Executive Board may call an
extraordinary meeting of the shareholders if the interests of
the stock corporation so require. Additionally, shareholders of
SAP AG holding in the aggregate a minimum of 5% of SAP AGs
issued share capital may call an extraordinary meeting of the
shareholders. Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to
attend and participate in shareholders meetings if they
have provided timely notice of their intention to attend the
meeting.
At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders
are asked, among other things, to formally approve the actions
taken by the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board in the
preceding fiscal year, to approve the distribution of the
corporations profits, to appoint an independent auditor
and to ratify amendments of our Articles of Incorporation.
Shareholder representatives of the Supervisory Board are elected
at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders for a term of
approximately five years. Shareholders may also be asked to
resolve on measures to raise or reduce the capital of the
Company. The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders can make
management decisions only if requested to do so by the Executive
Board.
CHANGE IN CONTROL
There are no provisions in the Articles of Incorporation of SAP
AG that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control of SAP AG and that would only
operate with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate
restructuring involving it or any of its subsidiaries.
On January 1, 2002, the German Securities Purchase and
Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und
Übernahmegesetz) became effective. It requires, among
other things, that a bidder seeking control of a company with
its corporate seat in Germany and traded on a European Union
stock exchange must publish advance notice of a tender offer,
submit a draft offer statement to the Federal Financial
Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für
110
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) for review, and obtain
certification from a qualified financial institution that
adequate financing is in place to complete the offer. Once a
bidder has acquired shares representing 30% of the voting power
of the target company, it must make an offer for all remaining
shares. The Securities Purchase and Takeover Act requires the
executive board of the target company to refrain from taking any
measures that may frustrate the success of the takeover offer.
However, the target executive board is permitted to take any
action that a prudent and diligent management of a company that
is not the target of a takeover bid would also take. Moreover,
the target executive board may search for other bidders and,
with the prior approval of the supervisory board, may take other
defensive measures, provided that both boards act within the
parameters of their general authority under the German Stock
Corporation Act. An executive board may also adopt specific
defensive measures if such measures have been approved by the
supervisory board and were specifically authorized by the
shareholders no later than 18 months in advance of a
takeover bid by resolution of 75% of the votes cast.
Effective as of July 14, 2006 the German Implementation Act
for the European Takeover Directive amended the German Purchase
and Takeover Act. Under the European Takeover Directive member
states may choose whether EU restrictions on frustrating action
apply to companies that are registered in their territory.
Germany decided to opt out and to retain its current
restrictions on a board taking frustrating action (as described
above). As required by the Directive if a country decides to opt
out the German Purchase and Takeover Act grants companies the
option of voluntarily applying the European standard by a change
of the Articles of Incorporation (opt-in). SAP AG has not made
use of this option. Furthermore, the German Commercial Act
(Handelsgesetzbuch) was amended and companies listed in
Germany are required to list in their Review of Group operations
and Review of operations, among other things, (i) all
material contracts with a change of control clause and
(ii) all compensation agreements with members of the
Executive Board or employees for the case of a change of
control. SAPs Review of Group operations, which is
included in its annual report, is available on SAPs Web
site at www.sap.com.
CHANGE IN SHARE
CAPITAL
Under German law, the capital stock may be increased in
consideration of contributions in cash or in kind, or by
establishing authorized capital or contingent capital or by an
increase of the companys capital reserves. Authorized
capital provides the Executive Board with the flexibility to
issue new shares for a period of up to five years, generally to
preserve liquidity. The Executive Board must obtain the approval
of the Supervisory Board before issuing new shares with regard
to the authorized capital. Contingent capital allows the
issuance of new shares for specified purposes, including
employee stock option plans and the issuance of shares upon
conversion of convertible bonds and exercise of stock options.
By law, the Executive Board may only issue new shares with
regard to the contingent capital for the specified purposes.
Capital increases require an approval by 75% of the issued
shares present at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders at
which the increase is proposed and require an amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation.
The share capital may be reduced by an amendment of the Articles
of Incorporation approved by 75% of the issued shares present at
the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. In addition, the
Executive Board of SAP AG is allowed to authorize a reduction of
the companys capital stock by canceling a defined number
of repurchased treasury shares if this repurchasing and the
subsequent reduction have already been approved by the Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders.
The Articles of Incorporation do not contain conditions
regarding changes in the share capital that are more stringent
than those required by German law.
RIGHTS ACCOMPANYING
OUR SHARES
There are no limitations imposed by German law or the Articles
of Incorporation of SAP AG on the rights to own securities,
including the rights of non-residents or foreign holders to hold
the ADRs or ordinary shares, to exercise voting rights or to
receive dividends or other payments on such shares.
111
According to the German stock corporation law, the rights of
shareholders cannot be amended without shareholders
consent. The Articles of Incorporation do not provide more
stringent conditions regarding changes of the rights of
shareholders than those required by German law.
Voting Rights
Each ordinary share represents one vote. Cumulative voting is
not permitted under German law. SAP AGs Articles of
Incorporation provide that resolutions may be passed at the
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders by the majority as
required by law. This means that resolutions may be passed by a
majority of votes cast, unless the law requires a higher vote.
German law requires that the following matters, among others, be
approved by the affirmative vote of 75% of the issued shares
present at the general shareholders meeting at which the
matter is proposed:
|
|
|
|
|
changing the corporate purpose of the company set out in the
articles of incorporation;
|
|
|
|
capital increases and capital decreases;
|
|
|
|
excluding preemptive rights of shareholders to subscribe for new
shares;
|
|
|
|
dissolution;
|
|
|
|
a merger into, or a consolidation with, another company;
|
|
|
|
a transfer of all or virtually all of the assets; and
|
|
|
|
a change of corporate form.
|
Dividend Rights
See Item 3. Key Information
Dividends and Item 8. Financial
Information Dividend Policy.
Preemptive Rights
Shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe
(Bezugsrecht) for any issue of additional shares in
proportion to their shareholdings in the issued capital. The
preemptive rights may be excluded under certain circumstances by
a shareholders resolution (approved by 75% of the issued
shares present at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders) or
by the Executive Board authorized by such shareholders
resolution and subject to the consent of the Supervisory Board.
Liquidation
If SAP AG were to be liquidated, any liquidation proceeds
remaining after all of our liabilities were paid would be
distributed to our shareholders in proportion to their
shareholdings.
Disclosure of
Shareholdings
SAP AGs Articles of Incorporation do not require
shareholders to disclose their share holdings. The German
Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz),
however, requires holders of voting securities of SAP AG to
notify SAP AG and the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of
the number or shares they hold if that number reaches, exceeds
of falls below specified thresholds. These thresholds are 3%,
5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75% of the
corporations outstanding voting rights.
In addition, the German Securities Trading Act also obliges
anyone who holds, directly or indirectly, financial instruments
that result in an entitlement to acquire, on ones
initiative alone and under a legally binding agreement, shares
in SAP AG, to notify without undue delay to SAP AG and the
Federal Financial
112
Supervisory Authority if the thresholds mentioned above have
been reached, exceeded or fallen below, with the exception of
the 3% threshold. Furthermore, the German Risk Limitation Act
(Risikobegrenzungsgesetz) provides for an aggregation of
positions in voting rights and other financial instruments
effective as of March 1, 2009.
Exchange Controls
and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders
The euro is a fully convertible currency. At the present time,
Germany does not restrict the export or import of capital,
except for investments in certain areas in accordance with
applicable resolutions adopted by the United Nations and the
European Union. However, for statistical purposes only, every
individual or corporation residing in Germany
(Resident) must report to the German Central Bank
(Deutsche Bundesbank), subject only to certain immaterial
exceptions, any payment received from or made to an individual
or a corporation residing outside of Germany
(Non-Resident) if such payment exceeds 12,500
(or the equivalent in a foreign currency). In addition, German
Residents must report any claims against or any liabilities
payable to Non-Residents if such claims or liabilities, in the
aggregate, exceed 5 million (or the equivalent in a
foreign currency) at the end of any calendar month. Residents
are also required to report annually to the German Central Bank
any shares or voting rights of 10% or more which they hold
directly or indirectly in non-resident corporations with total
assets of more than 3 million. Corporations residing
in Germany with assets in excess of 3 million must
report annually to the German Central Bank any shares or voting
rights of 10% or more held directly or indirectly by a
Non-Resident. For a discussion of the treatment of remittance of
dividends, interest or other payments to Non-Resident holders of
ADRs or ordinary shares, see below
Taxation German Taxation of
Holders of ADRs or Ordinary Shares.
TAXATION
General
The following discussion summarizes certain German tax and
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares. Although
the following discussion does not purport to describe all of the
tax considerations that may be relevant to a prospective
purchaser of ADRs or ordinary shares, this discussion:
(i) summarizes the material German tax consequences to a
holder of ADRs or ordinary shares, and (ii) summarizes
certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences to a
U.S. Holder (as hereinafter defined) of ADRs or ordinary
shares that is not resident (in the case of an individual) or
domiciled (in the case of a legal entity), as the case may be,
in Germany (in either case, referred to herein as not
resident or as a non-resident) and does not
have a permanent establishment or fixed base located in Germany
through which such ADRs or ordinary shares are held.
German
Taxation of Holders of ADRs or Ordinary Shares
The following discussion generally summarizes the principal
German tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares to a beneficial owner.
This summary is based on the laws that are in force at the date
of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and is subject to any changes in German law, or in any
applicable double taxation conventions to which Germany is a
party, occurring after such date. This discussion is also based,
in part, on representations of the Depositary and assumes that
each obligation of the Deposit Agreement and any related
agreements will be performed in accordance with its terms.
The following discussion is not a complete analysis or listing
of all potential German tax consequences to holders of ADRs or
ordinary shares and does not address all tax considerations that
may be relevant to all categories of potential purchasers or
owners of ADRs or ordinary shares. In particular, the following
discussion does not address the tax consequences for: (i) a
person that owns, directly or indirectly, 1% or more of SAP
AGs shares; (ii) a holding which forms a part of a
German permanent establishment of a person not resident in
Germany; (iii) a person that is resident in Germany and at
the same time resident in another country; or (iv) a
pension fund.
113
OWNERS AND PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF OUR ADRs OR ORDINARY SHARES
ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE
OVERALL GERMAN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF.
For purposes of applying German tax law and the double taxation
conventions to which Germany is a party, a holder of ADRs will
generally be treated as owning the ordinary shares represented
thereby.
German Taxation of
Dividends
For income tax purposes the half-income system applies with
regard to the taxation of dividends until December 31, 2008
(from January 1, 2009 onwards the existing rules on the
taxation of dividends and capital gains have been amended as
discussed below under Reform of the Taxation of Dividends
and Capital Gains). Under this system only half of the
distributed profits of a corporation will be included in the
personal income tax base of an individual shareholder resident
in Germany. It is not possible to credit the corporation tax
paid by the company against the shareholders income tax.
For corporation tax purposes, effectively, a portion of 95% of
the dividends received by corporate shareholders domiciled in
Germany will be tax-exempt in order to avoid double taxation.
These rules have some exceptions, which especially apply to
financial and certain insurance institutions.
Based on these considerations the German taxation of dividends
can be summarized as follows:
Under German income tax law, German corporations are required to
withhold tax on dividends in an amount equal to 20% (25% for
dividends distributed from January 1, 2009 onwards as
discussed below under Reform of the Taxation of Dividends
and Capital Gains) of the gross amount paid to resident
and non-resident shareholders. As the basis for deduction of the
withholding tax is the gross amount, withholding tax will be
deducted on the taxable and tax-exempt portion of the dividend
received. A 5.5% solidarity surtax on the German withholding tax
is currently levied on dividend distributions paid by a German
corporation, such as SAP AG. The solidarity surtax equals 1.1%
(5.5% of 20%) of the gross amount of a cash dividend (1.375%
(5.5% of 25%) for dividends distributed from January 1,
2009 onwards as discussed below under Reform of the
Taxation of Dividends and Capital Gains). Certain persons
resident in Germany (e.g., qualifying investment funds or
tax-exempt organizations) may obtain a partial or full refund of
such taxes.
For an individual holder of ordinary shares that is resident in
Germany, according to German income tax law, half of the
dividends received are subject to German income tax (for
dividends distributed from January 1, 2009 onwards see
below under Reform of the Taxation of Dividends and
Capital Gains). The same is generally true for ADRs
because each of them represents one ordinary share. For such a
holder, the taxable amount will be the sum of: (i) half of
the cash payment by SAP AG and (ii) half of the taxes
withheld. For a corporate holder of ADRs or ordinary shares that
is domiciled in Germany, according to German income tax law,
dividends in principle are exempt from corporation tax. However,
a portion of 5% of the dividends received is treated as
non-deductible expenses. Therefore, effectively a portion of 95%
of dividends received by a corporate holder of ADRs or ordinary
shares that is resident in Germany is exempt and a portion of 5%
of the dividends received is subject to corporation tax. These
rules as regards the (partial) exemption for dividends from
corporation tax have some exceptions, which especially apply to
financial and certain insurance institutions.
Subject to certain conditions, the tax withheld on the gross
amount will be eligible for credit against the holders
income tax or corporation tax liability. Exceeding amounts are
refunded upon filing and assessment of the tax return. For
holders subject to German trade tax, such tax is imposed, in
general, only on the amount of the dividends received, which is
subject to income tax or corporation tax. On the portion of the
dividends received which is exempt from income tax or
corporation tax, trade tax will become due if the holder of ADRs
or ordinary shares does not own at least 15% of the shares in
the distributing corporation at the beginning of the tax year.
114
Refund of
German Tax to U.S. Holders
A partial refund of the 20% withholding tax equal to 5% (for
dividends distributed from January 1, 2009 onwards a
partial refund of the 25% withholding tax equal to 10% as
discussed below under Reform of the Taxation of Dividends
and Capital Gains) of the gross amount of the dividend and
a full refund of the solidarity surtax can be obtained by a
U.S. Holder (as hereinafter defined) under the
U.S.-German
income tax treaty (Convention between the Federal Republic of
Germany and the United States of America for the Avoidance of
Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with
respect to Taxes on Income and Capital and to certain other
Taxes as recently amended by the Protocol of June 1, 2006
and as published in the German Federal Law Gazette 2008 vol. II
pp. 611/851, the Treaty). Thus, for each US$100 of
gross dividends paid by SAP AG to a U.S. Holder, the
dividends (which are dependant on the euro/dollar exchange rate
at the time of payment) after partial refund of the 20% (25%
from January 1, 2009 onwards as discussed below under
Reform of the Taxation of Dividends and Capital
Gains) withholding tax and a refund of the solidarity
surtax under the Treaty will be subject to a German withholding
tax of US$15.
To claim the refund of amounts withheld in excess of the Treaty
rate, a U.S. Holder must submit (either directly or, as
described below, through the Depositary) a claim for refund to
the German tax authorities, with, in the case of a direct claim,
the original bank voucher (or certified copy thereof) issued by
the paying entity documenting the tax withheld, within four
years from the end of the calendar year in which the dividend is
received. Claims for refund are made on a special German claim
for refund form, which must be filed with the German tax
authorities: Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, D-53221 Bonn,
Germany;
http://www.bzst.bund.de.
The German claim for refund form may be obtained from the German
tax authorities at the same address where applications are
filed, or from the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany,
4645 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20007.
U.S. Holders must also submit to the German tax authorities
a certification of their U.S. residency status (IRS
Form 6166). This certification can be obtained from the
Internal Revenue Service by filing a request for certification
with the Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 42530,
Philadelphia, PA
19101-2530
or, by private delivery service to Citibank, Attention: IRS
Lockbox Operations, 1617 Brett Road, New Castle, DE
19720-2425.
Requests for certification of U.S. residency status are to
be made by filing Form 8802 Application for United States
Residency Certification.
In accordance with arrangements under the Deposit Agreement, the
Depositary (or a custodian as its designated agent) holds the
ordinary shares and receives and distributes dividends to the
U.S. Holders. The Depositary has agreed, to the extent
practicable, to perform administrative functions necessary to
obtain the refund of amounts withheld in excess of the Treaty
rate for the benefit of U.S. Holders who supply the
necessary documentation.
In order to claim a refund, the U.S. Holder should deliver
an IRS Form 6166 certification to the Depositary along with
the completed claim for refund form. In the case of ADRs held
through a broker or other financial intermediary, the required
documentation should be delivered to such broker or financial
intermediary for forwarding to the Depositary. In all other
cases, the U.S. Holders should deliver the required
documentation directly to the Depositary. The Depositary will
file the required documentation with the German tax authorities
on behalf of the U.S. Holders.
The German tax authorities will issue the refunds, which will be
denominated in euro, in the name of the Depositary. The
Depositary will convert the refunds into dollars and issue
corresponding refund checks to the U.S. Holders or their
brokers.
Refund of
German Tax to Holders of ADRs or Ordinary Shares in Other
Countries
A holder of ADRs or ordinary shares resident in a country other
than Germany or the United States that has entered into a double
taxation convention with Germany may obtain a full or partial
refund of German withholding taxes. Rates and procedures may
vary according to the applicable treaty. Claims for refund, if
any,
115
are made on a special German claim for refund form, which must
be filed with the German tax authorities: Bundeszentralamt
für Steuern, D-53221 Bonn, Germany;
http://www.bzst.bund.de.
For details, such holders are urged to consult their own tax
advisors.
German
Taxation of Capital Gains
Half of a capital gain derived from the sale or other
disposition by an individual holder resident in Germany of ADRs
or ordinary shares is subject to income tax if the ADRs or
ordinary shares are held as part of his or her trade or business
or if the ADRs or ordinary shares held as part of his or her
private assets are sold within a period of one year after
acquisition until December 31, 2008 (from January 1,
2009 onwards the existing rules on the taxation of dividends and
capital gains have been amended as discussed below under
Reform of the Taxation of Dividends and Capital
Gains).
A capital gain derived from the sale or other disposition by a
corporate holder domiciled in Germany of ADRs or ordinary shares
is, in principle, exempt from corporation tax. However, a
portion of 5% of a capital gain derived is treated as
non-deductible business expenses. Therefore, effectively a
portion of 95% of a capital gain derived from the sale or other
disposition by a corporate holder domiciled in Germany of ADRs
or ordinary shares is exempt and a portion of 5% of a capital
gain derived is subject to corporation tax. These rules as
regards the (partial) exemption from corporation tax have some
exceptions, which especially apply to financial and certain
insurance institutions.
Special rules apply for individual and corporate holders
resident in Germany if the shares have been received in the
course of a tax-exempt reorganization.
For holders subject to German trade tax, such tax is imposed in
general only on the portion of the capital gain, which is
subject to income tax or corporation tax.
A holder of ADRs or ordinary shares resident or domiciled in a
country other than Germany is in general not subject to German
income or corporation tax on the capital gain derived from the
sale or other disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares.
Reform of
the Taxation of Dividends and Capital Gains
From January 1, 2009 onwards, the existing rules on the
taxation of dividends and capital gains have been amended if the
holder of the shares is an individual resident in Germany and if
he holds the shares in his or her private assets. In such a case
dividends will be subject to an income tax of 25% (flat rate)
plus solidarity surtax of 5.5% (total tax rate: 26.375%) plus,
as the case may be, church tax. The same will apply to capital
gains regardless of the period the shares will have been held
before they will be sold, provided the shares have been acquired
from January 1, 2009 onwards.
A portion of 40% of dividends and capital gains which an
individual earns from shares constituting business assets will
be exempted under the law effective from January 1, 2009.
The remaining 60% of such income will be subject to income tax
at individual income tax rates.
The existing rules will remain unchanged with respect to trade
tax and the taxation of corporate shareholders.
Also, dividends distributed to non-resident shareholders will be
subject to a withholding tax rate of 25% plus solidarity surtax
of 5.5% (total tax rate: 26.375%) from January 1, 2009
onwards. Corporate non-resident shareholders will generally be
entitled to a refund in the amount of two fifths of the
withholding tax (including solidarity surtax). This does not
preclude a further reduction of withholding tax, if any,
available under a relevant tax treaty.
For many non-resident shareholders the withholding tax rate is
currently reduced under applicable income tax treaties. E.g. for
a U.S. Holder a partial refund of the withholding tax rate
of 25% equal to 10% of the
116
gross amount of the dividend plus a full refund of the
solidarity surtax can be obtained (for an example see below
under U.S. Taxation of U.S. Holders of Ordinary
Shares or ADRs Distributions). To reduce the
withholding tax to the applicable treaty tax rate a non-resident
shareholder must apply for a refund of withholding taxes paid.
With regard to the respective refund procedure we refer to the
above sections Refund of German Tax to
U.S. Holders and Refund of German Tax to
Holders of ADRs or Ordinary Shares in Other Countries.
Other German Taxes
There are no German net worth, transfer, stamp or similar taxes
on the holding, purchase or sale of ADRs or ordinary shares.
German Estate and
Gift Taxes
A transfer of ADRs or ordinary shares by gift or by reason of
death of a holder will be subject to German gift or inheritance
tax, respectively, if the tax-free allowance is exceeded and one
of the following persons is resident in Germany: the donor or
transferor or his or her heir, or the donee or other
beneficiary. If one of the aforementioned persons is resident in
Germany and another is resident in a country having a treaty
with Germany, regarding gift or inheritance taxes, different
rules may apply. If none of the aforementioned persons is
resident in Germany, the transfer is not subject to German gift
or inheritance tax. For persons giving up German residence,
special rules apply during the first five years, and under
specific circumstances, during the first ten years, after the
end of the year in which the person left Germany. In general, in
the case of a U.S. Holder, a transfer of ADRs or ordinary
shares by gift or by reason of death that would otherwise be
subject to German gift or inheritance tax, respectively, will
not be subject to such German tax by reason of the
U.S.-German
estate tax treaty (Convention between the Federal Republic of
Germany and the United States of America for the Avoidance of
Double Taxation with respect to Estate, Gift and Inheritance
Taxes, German Federal Law Gazette 1982 II page 847, amended
by the Protocol of September 15, 2000, German Federal Law
Gazette 2000 II, page 1170 and as published on
December 21, 2000, German Federal Law Gazette 2001 II,
page 65) (the Estate Tax Treaty) unless the
donor or transferor, or the heir, donee or other beneficiary, is
domiciled in Germany for purposes of the Estate Tax Treaty at
the time of the making of the gift or at the time of the
donors or transferors death.
In general, the Estate Tax Treaty provides a credit against
U.S. federal estate and gift tax liability for the amount
of inheritance and gift tax paid in Germany, subject to certain
limitations, in a case where the ADRs or ordinary shares are
subject to German inheritance or gift tax and U.S. federal
estate or gift tax.
U.S. Taxation of
U.S. Holders of Ordinary Shares or ADRs
The following discussion generally summarizes certain
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of ADRs or ordinary shares to a
beneficial owner: (i) who is an individual citizen or
resident of the United States or a corporation organized under
the laws of the United States or any political subdivision
thereof, an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal
income tax regardless of its source or a trust, if a
U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over its
administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized
to control all substantial decisions of the trust; (ii) who
is not resident in Germany for German tax purposes;
(iii) whose holding of ADRs or ordinary shares does not
form part of the business property or assets of a permanent
establishment or fixed base in Germany; and (iv) who is
fully entitled to the benefits of the Treaty in respect of such
ADRs or ordinary shares (a U.S. Holder).
This summary deals only with ADRs and ordinary shares that are
held as capital assets and does not address tax considerations
applicable to U.S. Holders that may be subject to special
tax rules, such as dealers or traders in securities, financial
institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities,
regulated investment companies, U.S. Holders that hold
ordinary shares or ADRs as a part of a straddle, conversion
transaction or other arrangement involving more than one
position, U.S. Holders that own (or are deemed for
U.S. tax
117
purposes to own) 10% or more of the total combined voting power
of all classes of voting stock of SAP AG, U.S. Holders that
have a principal place of business or tax home
outside the United States or U.S. Holders whose
functional currency is not the dollar and
U.S. Holders that hold ADRs or ordinary shares through
partnerships or other pass-through entities.
The discussion below is based upon the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), the
Treaty and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions there
under at the date of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Any such authority may be repealed, revoked or modified, perhaps
with retroactive effect, so as to result in U.S. federal
income tax consequences different from those discussed below. No
assurance can be given that the conclusions set out below would
be sustained by a court if challenged by the IRS. The discussion
below is based, in part, on representations of the Depositary,
and assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and
any related agreements will be performed in accordance with its
terms.
THE DISCUSSION SET OUT BELOW IS INTENDED ONLY AS A SUMMARY OF
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF AN
INVESTMENT IN ADRs OR ORDINARY SHARES. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE
URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE APPLICATION TO
THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATION OF THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS DISCUSSED
BELOW, AS WELL AS THE APPLICATION OF STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAX
LAW. THE STATEMENTS OF U.S. TAX LAW SET OUT BELOW ARE BASED
ON THE LAWS IN FORCE AND INTERPRETATIONS THEREOF AT THE DATE OF
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 20-F
AND ARE SUBJECT TO ANY CHANGES OCCURRING AFTER THAT DATE.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder of
ADRs will be considered to own the ordinary shares represented
thereby. Accordingly, unless the context otherwise requires, all
references in this section to ordinary shares are deemed to
refer likewise to ADRs representing an ownership interest in
ordinary shares.
Distributions
Subject to the discussion below under Passive Foreign
Investment Company Considerations distributions made by
SAP AG with respect to ordinary shares (other than distributions
in liquidation and certain distributions in redemption of
stock), including the amount of German tax deemed to have been
withheld in respect of such distributions, will be taxed to
U.S. Holders as ordinary dividend income to the extent that
such distributions do not exceed the current and accumulated
earnings and profits of SAP AG as computed for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. SAP AG does not maintain calculations of
its earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax
principles. If SAP AG does not report to a U.S. Holder the
portion of a distribution that exceeds earnings and profits, the
distribution will generally be taxable as a dividend even if
that distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable
return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described
above.
As discussed above, a U.S. Holder may obtain a refund of
German withholding tax to the extent that the German withholding
tax exceeds 15% of the amount of the associated distribution.
For example, if SAP AG distributes a cash dividend equal to
US$100 to a U.S. Holder, the distribution currently will be
subject to German withholding tax of US$20 plus US$1.10 surtax,
and the U.S. Holder will receive US$78.90 (for dividends
distributed from January 1, 2009 onwards withholding tax
amounts to US$25 plus surtax of US$1.38 and the U.S. Holder
will receive US$73.62 as generally described above under
Reform of the Taxation of Dividends and Capital
Gains). If the U.S. Holder obtains the Treaty refund,
he will receive an additional US$6.10 (for dividends distributed
from January 1, 2009 onwards US$11.38) from the German tax
authorities. For U.S. tax purposes, such U.S. Holder
will be considered to have received a total distribution of
US$100, which will be deemed to have been subject to German
withholding tax of US$15 (15% of US$100) resulting in the net
receipt of US$85.
In the case of a distribution in euro, the amount of the
distribution generally will equal the dollar value of the euro
distributed (determined by reference to the spot currency
exchange rate on the date of receipt of the distribution
(receipt by the Depositary in the case of a distribution on
ADRs)), regardless of whether the holder in fact converts the
euro into dollars, and the U.S. Holder will not realize any
separate foreign currency gain or loss (except to the extent
that such gain or loss arises on the actual disposition of
foreign currency received).
118
Dividends paid by SAP AG generally will constitute
portfolio income for purposes of the limitations on
the use of passive activity losses (and, therefore, generally
may not be offset by passive activity losses) and as
investment income for purposes of the limitation on
the deduction of investment interest expense. Dividends paid by
SAP AG will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction
generally allowed to U.S. corporations under
Section 243 of the Code. Dividends paid by SAP AG after
December 31, 2002 are treated as qualified dividends
subject to capital gains rates as provided by the Jobs and
Growth Tax Reconciliation Act of 2003. These reduced rates are
scheduled to expire for years beginning after December 31,
2010.
Sale or
Exchange
In general, assuming that SAP AG at no time is a passive foreign
investment company, upon a sale or exchange of ordinary shares
to a person other than SAP AG, a U.S. Holder will recognize
gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount realized on the sale or exchange and the
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the ordinary
shares. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will
be long-term capital gain (taxable at a reduced rate for
individuals) if the ordinary shares were held for more than one
year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to
significant limitations. Upon a sale of ordinary shares to SAP
AG, a U.S. Holder may recognize capital gain or loss or,
alternatively, may be considered to have received a distribution
with respect to the ordinary shares, in each case depending upon
the application to such sale of the rules of Section 302 of
the Code.
Deposit and withdrawal of ordinary shares in exchange for ADRs
by a U.S. Holder will not result in its realization of gain
or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Foreign
Tax Credit
In general, in computing its U.S. federal income tax
liability, a U.S. Holder may elect for each taxable year to
claim a deduction or, subject to the limitations on foreign tax
credits generally, a credit for foreign income taxes paid or
accrued by it. For U.S. foreign tax credit purposes,
subject to the applicable limitations under the foreign tax
credit rules, the 15% German tax that is treated as having been
withheld from dividends paid to a U.S. Holder will be
eligible for credit against the U.S. Holders federal
income tax liability. Thus, in the numerical example set out
above, a U.S. Holder who receives a cash distribution of
US$85 from SAP AG (US$100 of the initial distribution net of
US$20 of German withholding tax and US$1.10 of surtax plus the
Treaty refund of US$6.10; for dividends distributed from
January 1, 2009 onwards US$100 of the initial distribution
net of US$25 of German withholding tax and US$1.38 of surtax
plus the Treaty refund of US$11.38) will be treated as having
been subject to German withholding tax in the amount of US$15
(15% of US$100) and will be able to claim the U.S. foreign
tax credit, subject to applicable foreign tax credit
limitations, in the amount of US$15.
For U.S. foreign tax credit purposes, dividends paid by SAP
AG generally will be treated as foreign-source income and as
passive category income (or in the case of certain
holders, as general category income). Gains or
losses realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or exchange of
ordinary shares generally will be treated as
U.S.-source
gain or loss.
The availability of foreign tax credits depends on the
particular circumstances of each U.S. Holder.
U.S. Holders are advised to consult their own tax advisors.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company Considerations
Classification as a PFIC. Special and adverse
U.S. tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that holds an
interest in a passive foreign investment company (a
PFIC). In general, a PFIC is any
non-U.S. corporation,
if (i) 75% or more of the gross income of such corporation
for the taxable year is passive income (the income
test) or (ii) the average percentage of assets (by
value) held by such corporation during the taxable year that
produce passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, royalties,
rents and annuities) or that are held for the production of
passive income is at least 50% (the asset test). A
corporation that owns, directly or indirectly, at least 25% by
119
value of the stock of a second corporation must take into
account its proportionate share of the second corporations
income and assets in applying the income test and the asset test.
Based on current projections concerning the composition of SAP
AGs income and assets, SAP AG does not believe that it
will be treated as a PFIC for its current or future taxable
years. However, because this conclusion is based on our current
projections and expectations as to its future business activity,
SAP AG can provide no assurance that it will not be treated as a
PFIC in respect of its current or any future taxable years.
Consequences of PFIC Status. If SAP AG is treated
as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder
holds ordinary shares, then, subject to the discussion of the
qualified electing fund (QEF) and
mark-to-market rules below, such U.S. Holder
generally will be subject to a special and adverse tax regime
with respect to any gain realized on the disposition of the
ordinary shares and with respect to certain excess
distributions made to it by SAP AG. The adverse tax
consequences include taxation of such gain or excess
distribution at ordinary income rates and payment of an interest
charge on tax, which is deemed to have been deferred with
respect to such gain or excess distributions. Under the PFIC
rules, excess distributions include dividends or other
distributions received with respect to the ordinary shares, if
the aggregate amount of such distributions in any taxable year
exceeds 125% of the average amount of distributions from SAP AG
made during a specified base period.
In some circumstances, a U.S. Holder may avoid certain of
the unfavorable consequences of the PFIC rules by making a QEF
election in respect of SAP AG. A QEF election effectively would
require an electing U.S. Holder to include in income
currently its pro rata share of the ordinary earnings and net
capital gain of SAP AG. However, a U.S. Holder cannot elect
QEF status with respect to SAP AG unless SAP AG complies with
certain reporting requirements and there can be no assurance
that SAP AG will provide such information.
A U.S. Holder that holds marketable stock in a
PFIC may, in lieu of making a QEF election, also avoid certain
unfavorable consequences of the PFIC rules by electing to mark
the PFIC stock to market at the close of each taxable year. SAP
AG expects that the ordinary shares will be
marketable for this purpose. A U.S. Holder that
makes the mark-to-market election will be required to include in
income each year as ordinary income an amount equal to the
excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock at the
close of the year over the U.S. Holders adjusted tax
basis in the stock. If, at the close of the year, the
U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis exceeds the fair
market value of the stock, then the U.S. Holder may deduct
any such excess from ordinary income, but only to the extent of
net mark-to-market gains previously included in income. Any gain
from the actual sale of the PFIC stock will be treated as
ordinary income, and any loss will be treated as ordinary loss
to the extent of net mark-to-market gains previously included in
income.
Taxation of Holders
of ADRs or Ordinary Shares in Other Countries
HOLDERS OR POTENTIAL HOLDERS OF ADRs OR ORDINARY SHARES WHO ARE
RESIDENT OR OTHERWISE TAXABLE IN COUNTRIES OTHER THAN GERMANY
AND THE UNITED STATES ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX
ADVISORS CONCERNING THE OVERALL TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE
ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF ADRs OR ORDINARY
SHARES.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Loan Facility
On October 7, 2007, we entered into a Tender Offer
Agreement with Business Objects whereby we undertook to conduct
concurrent tender offers in France and the United States for all
outstanding securities of Business Objects. In connection with
the tender offers, we entered into a 5 billion loan
facility (subsequently reduced to 4.45 billion as of
December 31, 2007 and further reduced to
2.95 billion in February 2008) with Deutsche
Bank AG serving as the Original Mandated Lead Arranger, Deutsche
Bank Luxembourg S.A. serving as the Agent and Existing Lender
and Deutsche Bank AG, Paris Branch serving as the Presenting
Bank for purposes
120
of the French tender offer pursuant to a loan agreement that was
amended and restated as of February 27, 2008 (the
Loan Facility). Funds available under the Loan
Facility were available only in connection with the financing of
the tender offers. There is no further availability for drawings
under the Loan Facility and the facility terminates on
December 31, 2009.
The Loan Facility is not subject to any financial covenants.
Borrowings under the Loan Facility bear interest of EURIBOR plus
a margin of 0.25%. As of March 9, 2009, we had an
outstanding borrowing of 2.3 billion under the Loan
Facility. The Loan Facility contains representations customary
for credit facilities of this nature, including accuracy of
financial statements; absence of material litigation; no
violation of laws or material agreements; power and authority to
enter into and perform the Loan Facility documentation; and
material accuracy of information.
The Loan Facility also contains certain events of default
customary for loan facilities of this nature, including
non-payment of principal or interest when due; breach of
covenants; material incorrectness of representations when made;
bankruptcy and insolvency of SAP and its material subsidiaries;
and cross-default of other material indebtedness. If any of
these events of default occur and are not cured within
applicable grace periods or waived, the agent under the Loan
Facility will at the request, or may with the consent of the
lenders owed a majority of the then aggregate unpaid principal
amount of the borrowings declare all amounts under the Loan
Facility immediately due and payable.
This description is a summary of the Loan Facility and is
qualified in its entirety by the Loan Facility and related
documents which are filed as Exhibit 4.4 and
Exhibit 4.1.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Credit Facility
On November 5, 2004, we entered into a Syndicated
Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with an
initial term of 5 years (the Credit Agreement)
among SAP; the lenders named in the Credit Agreement; ABN AMRO
Bank N.V., BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank AG and J.P. Morgan
plc as Mandated Lead Arrangers; and ABN AMRO N.V. London Branch
as Agent (the Agent).
Under the Credit Agreement, we may borrow up to
1,000,000,000 for general corporate purposes, and amounts
borrowed and prepaid as described below may be reborrowed. We
are required to pay a commitment fee of 0.07% per annum on
unused amounts of the available revolving credit facility. The
Credit Agreement does not provide for any financial covenants.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest of EURIBOR or LIBOR
for the respective currency plus a margin ranging from 0.20% to
0.25% depending on the amount drawn.
We may prepay at any time, at our option, in whole or in part
(but not less than 20,000,000 at any time) any outstanding
borrowings plus accrued interest upon up to five business
days notice to the Agent. We are required to pay any
related breakage costs in connection with prepaying.
The Credit Agreement contains representations customary for
credit facilities of this nature, including accuracy of
financial statements; absence of material litigation; no
violation of laws or agreements; power and authority to enter
into and perform the Credit Agreement and related finance
documentation; and material accuracy of information.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain events of default
customary for credit facilities of this nature, including
non-payment of principal or interest when due; breach of
covenants; material incorrectness of representations when made;
bankruptcy and insolvency of SAP and its material subsidiaries;
and cross-default of other material indebtedness. If any of
these events of default occur and are not cured within
applicable grace periods or waived, the Agent will at the
request, or may with the consent of the lenders owed a majority
of the then aggregate unpaid principal amount of the borrowings
declare all amounts under the Credit Agreement immediately due
and payable.
121
As of March 9, 2009, SAP has not made any borrowings under
the Credit Agreement.
This description is a summary of the Credit Agreement and is
qualified in its entirety by the Credit Agreement, which is
filed as Exhibit 4.11 to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with
these requirements, we file reports and furnish other
information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. These
materials, including this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and copied at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also
maintains a Web site at www.sec.gov that contains reports
and other information regarding registrants that file
electronically with the SEC. Our annual report and some of the
other information submitted by us to the SEC may be accessed
through this Web site. In addition, information about us is
available at our Web site: www.sap.com.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various financial risks, including changes in
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, equity prices
and the creditworthiness of our counterparties.
We manage credit, liquidity, interest rate, equity price and
foreign currency exchange rate risks on a Group-wide basis.
Selected derivatives are exclusively used for this purpose and
not for speculation which is defined as entering into derivative
instruments without a corresponding underlying transaction.
Financial risk management is done centrally. It is regulated by
internal guidelines and undergoes continuous internal risk
analysis.
For the presentation of market risks, we use sensitivity
analyses that show the effects of hypothetical changes of
relevant risk variables on income and other comprehensive income
depending whether fair value fluctuations affect earnings or
shareholders equity. The periodic effects are determined
by relating the hypothetical changes in the risk variables to
the balance of financial instruments at the reporting date.
The following discussion of our market risk exposure should be
read in conjunction with the related Notes 25 and 26 to our
consolidated financial statements in Item 18.
Financial Statements.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
EXCHANGE RATE RISK
Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the risk of loss due to
adverse changes in foreign exchange rates. As a globally active
enterprise, we are subject to risks associated with fluctuations
in foreign currencies with regard to our ordinary operations.
Foreign currency-denominated receivables, payables, debt, and
other monetary balance sheet positions as well as future cash
flows resulting from forecasted transactions, including
intra-group transactions, are subject to currency risks. Risks
from foreign currencies are continuously assessed. Most of these
transactions are hedged to the extent that they influence our
income and cash flows.
Under U.S. GAAP, foreign exchange risks arise on account of
monetary financial instruments denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency where the nonfunctional currency is
the respective risk variable; translation risks are not taken
into consideration. Because the individual Group entities mainly
conduct their operating business in their own functional
currencies, our risk of exchange rate fluctuations from ongoing
ordinary operations is not considered significant.
With regard to our investing and financing activities we are not
exposed to any significant foreign exchange risk as all
activities are conducted in the respective functional currency.
122
We disclose our risk exposure based on a sensitivity analysis
using the following assumptions:
According to our general policy not to invoice in currencies
other than the entitys functional currency, the majority
of our nonderivative monetary financial instruments such as
cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, loans to employees
and third parties, bank liabilities, and other financial
liabilities are denominated in the respective entities
functional currency. Thus, a foreign exchange risk in these
transactions is nonexistent. In exceptional cases and limited
economic environments, operating transactions are denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency leading to a
currency risk for the related monetary instruments. Where we
hedge against currency impacts on cash flows, these foreign
currency-denominated financial instruments are economically
converted into the functional currency by the use of forward
exchange contracts or options. Therefore, fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates do not have a significant impact
on profit and loss or shareholders equity with regard to
our nonderivative monetary financial instruments.
Furthermore, income or expenses on the nonderivative monetary
financial instruments discussed above are always recognized in
the relevant entitys functional currency. Therefore,
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates have no significant
impact on profit and loss or shareholders equity in this
regard.
Our freestanding derivatives designed for hedging foreign
currency exchange rate risks almost completely balance the
changes in the fair values of the hedged item attributable to
exchange rate movements in the income statement in the same
period. As a consequence, the hedged items and the hedging
instruments are not exposed to currency risks with an effect on
profit or loss, or shareholders equity either.
Consequently, we are only exposed to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations with regard to:
|
|
|
|
|
derivatives held within a designated cash-flow hedging
relationship and
|
|
|
|
foreign currency embedded derivatives (which arise for instance
due to a foreign-currency denominated contract in Switzerland).
|
As all our cash-flow hedges in a hedge relationship are
effective, the fluctuations in the respective currencies affect
other comprehensive income. The interest element which is not
part of the assigned hedging relationship and is posted to
profit and loss is not affected by currency fluctuations. As we
do not have a significant exposure to a single currency, we
disclose our exposure to our major currencies in total. If, at
December 31, 2008, the euro had gained (lost) 10% against
all our major currencies, the unrealized foreign currency
cash-flow hedge position in other comprehensive income would
have been 65 million (December 31, 2007:
64 million) higher (lower) than presented.
Any change in the value of our foreign currency embedded
derivatives is recorded in profit or loss. If, at
December 31, 2008, the euro had gained (lost)
10 percent against the Swiss franc, the effect on other
nonoperating income would have been 40 million
(December 31, 2007: 37 million) higher (lower)
than presented. If at December 31, 2008, the euro had
gained (lost) 10 percent against all other currencies, the
effect on other nonoperating income would have been
3 million (December 31, 2007:
3 million) lower (higher) (December 31, 2007:
higher (lower)) than presented.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Interest-rate risks result from changes in market interest rates
which can cause changes in the fair value of fixed-rate
instruments and interest to be paid for variable-rate
instruments.
This risk is negligible with regard to our operating activities.
Interest rate risks arise on account of our investing activities
in debt instruments and our financing activities in connection
with financial liabilities. In order to create a balanced
structure of fixed and variable financial cash flows, we manage
interest-rate risk by adding interest rate-related derivative
instruments to a given portfolio of investments and debt
financing.
123
Due to the short maturities of our investments (all our debt
securities are classified as current) we do not have a
significant interest-rate risk related to financial assets. See
Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for a more
detailed discussion.
We entered into derivative financial instruments to hedge the
interest rate risk resulting from the variable interest rate
credit facility in connection with the acquisition of Business
Objects.
A sensitivity analysis is provided to show our interest rate
risk exposure at the balance sheet date based on the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates only affect nonderivative fixed-rate
financial instruments if they are recognized at fair value. As
we have classified our investments as available for sale we
carry interest-rate sensitive debt investments at fair value
with fair value changes recognized in other comprehensive
income. For this reason, changes in prevailing market rates are
included in the equity-related sensitivity calculation.
|
|
|
|
Income or expenses for nonderivative financial instruments with
variable interest are subject to interest rate risk if they are
not hedged items in an effective hedging relationship. We
therefore have no significant interest-rate risk arising from
our financial liabilities and consider interest rate changes for
our variable rate debt investments in the earnings-related
sensitivity calculation.
|
|
|
|
Due to the aforementioned designation of interest rate
derivatives to a cash-flow hedge relationship, the respective
interest rate changes affect the unrealized interest rate
cash-flow hedge position in other comprehensive income. The
movements related to the interest rate swaps variable leg
are not reflected in the sensitivity calculation as they offset
the variable interest payments for the credit facility. We
therefore consider only changes from the interest rate
swaps fixed leg in the equity-related sensitivity
calculation for the interest swaps in a hedge relationship.
|
|
|
|
As the deal contingent interest rate payer swaps are
freestanding derivatives with fair value fluctuations charged to
profit or loss we include only changes from the interest rate
swaps fixed leg in the earnings-related sensitivity
calculation. The movements related to the interest rate
swaps variable leg are not reflected in the sensitivity
calculation as they offset the variable interest payments for
the credit facility.
|
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the unrealized
gains/losses on marketable securities position in other
components of equity would have been 0 million
(December 31, 2007: 2 million) lower (higher)
than presented.
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates for our variable
rate debt investments had been 100 basis points higher
(lower), the financial income/expense, net would have been
3 million (December 31, 2007:
1 million) higher (lower) than presented.
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the Unrealized interest
rate cash-flow hedge position in other comprehensive income
would have been 1 million (December 31, 2007:
0 million) lower (higher) than presented.
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the impact on financial
income/expense, net from deal contingent interest rate payer
swaps would have been 0 million higher (lower)
(December 31, 2007: 9 million higher and
7 million lower, respectively) than presented.
EQUITY PRICE RISK
Equity-price risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in
equity markets. Our investments consist of listed and non-listed
securities held for purposes other than trading and are
classified as available for sale. Our equity investments in
listed securities are accounted for at fair value with fair
value changes recorded in other comprehensive income and are
monitored based on the current market value that is affected by
the fluctuations in the volatile stock markets worldwide. An
assumed 20% increase (decrease) in equity prices as of
December 31,
124
2008 would not have a material impact on the value of our
investments in marketable securities (2007:
1 million) with corresponding entries in other
comprehensive income.
The equity investments in non-listed securities are monitored
individually. Those securities are recognized at cost, because
market values are generally not observable. They are subject to
an annual impairment test.
OTHER RISKS
Share-Based
Compensation Hedging
We hedge certain cash flow exposures associated with both
recognized and unrecognized share-based compensation through the
purchase of derivative instruments from independent financial
institutions.
See Notes 25, 26 and 27 to our consolidated financial
statements in Item 18. Financial Statements for
more information regarding our share-based compensation
activities, including the detail of the derivative instruments
we held as of December 31, 2008 as hedges.
Credit Risk
See Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for a discussion
of our credit risk exposure.
Liquidity Risk
See Note 26 to our consolidated financial statements in
Item 18. Financial Statements for a discussion
of our liquidity risk exposure. Also see ITEM 5.
Liquidity and Capital Resources for more information on
our liquidity risk.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other
procedures of SAP that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by SAP in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
SAP in the reports that it files or
125
submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to SAP management, including SAPs principal executive and
financial officers (i.e. SAPs co-chief executive officers
(Co-CEOs) and chief financial officer
(CFO)), or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. SAPs management evaluated, with the
participation of SAPs Co-CEOs, Henning Kagermann and
Léo Apotheker, and CFO, Werner Brandt, the effectiveness of
SAPs disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2008. The evaluation was led by SAPs
Global Governance Risk & Compliance function,
including dedicated SOX Champions in all of
SAPs major entities and business units with the
participation of process owners, SAPs key corporate senior
management, senior management of each business group, and as
indicated above under the supervision of SAPs Co-CEOs and
CFO. Based on the foregoing, SAPs management, including
SAPs Co-CEOs and CFO, concluded that as of
December 31, 2008, SAPs disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
MANAGEMENTS
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of SAP is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. SAPs internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed under the
supervision of SAPs Co-CEOs and CFO to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
SAPs management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, it used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework.
Based on the assessment under these criteria, SAP management has
concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was effective.
KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, our independent
registered public accounting firm has issued its attestation
report on the effectiveness of SAPs internal control over
financial reporting, which is included below under the heading
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
CHANGE IN INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting during the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 20-F
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of SAP
AG:
We have audited SAP AGs internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). SAP AGs
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing
126
the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, SAP AG maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of SAP AG as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders equity, comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008, and our report dated March 25, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Mannheim, Germany
March 25, 2009
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT
COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our Supervisory Board determined that Erhard Schipporeit is an
audit committee financial expert, as defined by the
regulations of the Commission issued pursuant to
Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and meeting
the requirements of Item 16A. He is
independent, as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 16B. CODE
OF ETHICS
In 2003, SAP adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to
all employees (including all personnel in the accounting and
controlling departments) and the members of SAPs Executive
Board (including our Co-CEOs and CFO). Our Code of Business
Conduct constitutes a code of ethics as defined in
Item 16.B of
Form 20-F.
Our Code of Business Conduct sets standards for all dealings
with customers, partners, competitors and suppliers and
includes, among others, regulations with regard to
confidentiality, loyalty, preventing
127
conflicts of interest and preventing bribery. International
differences in culture, language, and legal and social systems
make the adoption of uniform Codes of Business Conduct across an
entire global company challenging. As a result, SAP has set
forth a master code containing minimum standards. In turn, each
company within the SAP Group has been required to adopt a
similar code that meets at least these minimum standards, but
may also include additional or more stringent rules of conduct.
Newly acquired companies also are expected to meet the minimum
standards set forth in the Code of Business Conduct.
We have made our Code of Business Conduct publicly available by
posting the full text on our Web site under
www.sap.com/corpgovernance (section Policies and
Statutes). The published Code of Business Conduct is the
code of our parent company, SAP AG. It is identical to the
master code.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
AUDIT FEES,
AUDIT-RELATED FEES, TAX FEES AND ALL OTHER FEES
Refer to Note 31 to our consolidated financial statements
in Item 18. Financial Statements for
information on fees paid to our independent registered public
accounting firm, KPMG, for audit services and other professional
services.
AUDIT
COMMITTEES PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
As required under German law, our shareholders appoint our
independent auditors to audit our financial statements, based on
a proposal that is legally required to be submitted by the
Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Boards proposal is
based on a proposal by the Audit Committee. See also the
description under the heading Corporate Governance
in Item 10. Additional Information.
In 2002 our Audit Committee adopted a policy with regard to the
pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by
our independent auditors. This policy, which is designed to
assure that such engagements do not impair the independence of
our auditors, was amended and expanded in 2003 and 2007. The
policy requires prior approval of the Audit Committee for all
services to be provided by our independent auditors for any
entity of the SAP Group. With regard to non-audit services the
policy distinguishes among three categories of services:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Prohibited services: This category includes services
that our independent auditors must not be engaged to perform.
These are services that are not permitted by applicable law or
that would be inconsistent with maintaining the auditors
independence.
|
|
|
2.
|
Services requiring universal approval: Services of
this category may be provided by our independent auditors up to
a certain aggregate amount in fees per year that is determined
annually by the Audit Committee.
|
|
|
3.
|
Services requiring individual approval: Services of
this category may only be provided by our independent auditors
if they have been individually (specifically) pre-approved by
the Audit Committee or an Audit Committee member who is
authorized by the Audit Committee to make such approvals.
|
Our Chief Accounting Officer reviews all individual requests to
engage our independent auditors as a service provider in
accordance with this policy and determines the category to which
the requested service belongs. All requests for engagements with
expected fees over a specified limit are additionally reviewed
by our CFO. Based on the determination of the category the
request is (i) declined if it is a prohibited
service, (ii) approved if it is a service
requiring universal approval and the maximum aggregate
amount fixed by the Audit Committee has not been reached or
(iii) forwarded to the Audit Committee for individual
approval if the service requires individual approval
or is a service requiring universal approval and the
maximum aggregate amount fixed by the Audit Committee has been
exceeded.
128
Our Audit Committees pre-approval policies also include
information requirements to ensure the Audit Committee is kept
aware of the volume of engagements involving our independent
auditors that were not individually pre-approved by the Audit
Committee itself.
All services performed by our independent auditors in the last
two fiscal years were authorized pursuant to our pre-approval
policies.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS
FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act requires that all members of our audit
committee be independent, subject to certain exceptions. In
accordance with German law, the Audit Committee consists of both
employee and shareholder elected members.
Rule 10A-3
provides an exception for an employee of a foreign private
issuer such as SAP who is not an executive officer of that
issuer and who is elected to the supervisory board or audit
committee of that issuer pursuant to the issuers governing
law. In this case, the employee is exempt from the independence
requirements of
Rule 10A-3
and is permitted to sit on the audit committee.
We rely on this exemption. Our Audit Committee includes two
members who are non-executive employees of SAP AG, Thomas
Bamberger and Gerhard Maier, who were named to our Supervisory
Board pursuant to the German Co-determination Act (see
Item 6 for details). We believe that the reliance on this
exemption does not materially adversely affect the ability of
our Audit Committee to act independently and to satisfy the
other requirements of
Rule 10A-3.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
The following table sets out information concerning purchases of
our ordinary shares under our supported Employee Discount Stock
Purchase programs, Long-Term Incentive Plan 2000, Stock Option
Plan 2002 and other share buy-back activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
|
Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(in )
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
the Plans or Programs
|
|
|
January 1/1/08 1/31/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
77,023,001
|
|
February 2/1/08 2/28/08
|
|
|
3,339,428
|
|
|
|
32,47
|
|
|
|
3,339,428
|
|
|
|
74,926,777
|
|
March 3/1/08 3/31/08
|
|
|
4,687,699
|
|
|
|
31,98
|
|
|
|
4,687,699
|
|
|
|
70,324,007
|
|
April 4/1/08 4/30/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
70,372,708
|
|
May 5/1/08 5/31/08
|
|
|
3,813,435
|
|
|
|
32,58
|
|
|
|
3,813,435
|
|
|
|
66,606,519
|
|
June 6/1/08 6/30/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,777,219
|
|
July 7/1/08 7/31/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,868,806
|
|
August 8/1/08 8/31/08
|
|
|
2,361,207
|
|
|
|
37,83
|
|
|
|
2,361,207
|
|
|
|
64,985,901
|
|
September 9/1/08 9/30/08
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
37,32
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
83,915,467
|
|
October 10/1/08 10/31/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
83,975,123
|
|
November 11/1/08 11/30/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
84,049,348
|
|
December 12/1/08 12/31/08
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
84,119,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,601,769
|
|
|
|
33,34
|
|
|
|
14,601,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases between January 1, 2008 and June 3, 2008
were made in accordance with the authorization to acquire and
use treasury shares granted at the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders on May 10, 2007, pursuant to which the
Executive Board was authorized to acquire, on or before
October 31, 2008, up to 120 million shares of SAP.
129
Purchases between June 4, 2008 and December 31, 2008
were made in accordance with the authorization to acquire and
use treasury shares granted at the Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders on June 3, 2008, pursuant to which the
Executive Board was authorized to acquire, on or before
November 30, 2009, up to 120 million shares of SAP.
The authorization from June 3, 2008 replaced the
authorization from May 10, 2007.
Both authorizations were subject to the provision that the
shares to be purchased, together with any other shares already
acquired and held by SAP, do not account for more than 10% of
SAPs capital stock.
All purchases were made in market transactions effected on the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange via the electronic trading system Xetra.
We did not purchase our ADRs during 2008.
ITEM 16F. CHANGES
IN REGISTRANTSS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
Not applicable.
ITEM 16G. DIFFERENCES
IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The following summarizes the principal ways in which our
corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock
Exchange, NYSE, corporate governance rules
applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, the NYSE
Rules. Further information about the differences between
our corporate governance practices and the NYSE Rules is
available on the SAP website at
(http://www.sap.com/about/governance/statutes/index.epx).
Introduction
SAP is incorporated under the laws of Germany, with securities
publicly traded on markets in Germany (Frankfurt Exchange) and
the United States (NYSE).
The NYSE Rules permit foreign private issuers to follow
applicable home country corporate governance practices in lieu
of the NYSE corporate governance standards, subject to certain
exceptions. Foreign private issuers electing to follow home
country corporate governance rules are required to disclose the
principal differences in their corporate governance practices
from those required under the NYSE Rules. This Item 16G
summarizes the principal ways in which SAPs corporate
governance practices differ from the NYSE Rules applicable to
domestic issuers.
Legal Framework
The primary source of law relating to the corporate governance
of a German stock corporation is the German Stock Corporation
Act (Aktiengesetz). Additionally, the Securities Trading
Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz), the German Securities
Purchase and Take Over Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und
Übernahmegesetz), the Stock Exchange Admission
Regulations, the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch) and certain other German statutes
contain corporate governance rules applicable to SAP. In
addition to these mandatory rules, the German Corporate
Governance Code (GCGC) summarizes the mandatory
statutory corporate governance principles found in the German
Stock Corporation Act and other provisions of German law.
Further, the GCGC contains supplemental recommendations and
suggestions for standards on responsible corporate governance
intended to reflect generally accepted best practices.
The German Stock Corporation Act requires the executive and the
supervisory board of exchange-listed companies like SAP to
declare annually that the recommendations set forth in the GCGC
have been and are being complied with, and to identify any
recommendations not being applied. SAP has disclosed deviations
from a few of the GCGC recommendations in its Declaration of
Compliance on a yearly basis since 2003. These declarations are
available on the SAP website
(www.sap.com/about/governance/statutes/index.epx).
130
Significant
Differences
We believe the following to be the significant differences
between German corporate governance practices, as SAP has
implemented them, and those applicable to domestic companies
under the NYSE Rules.
German Stock
Corporations are Required to have a Two-Tier Board System
SAP is governed by three separate bodies: (i) the
Supervisory Board, which counsels, supervises and controls the
Executive Board; (ii) the Executive Board, which is
responsible for the day-to-day management of SAP; and
(iii) the General Shareholders Meeting. The rules
applicable to these governing bodies are defined by German law
and by SAPs Articles of Incorporation. This corporate
structure differs from the unitary board of directors
established by the relevant laws of all U.S. states and the
NYSE Rules. See Item 10. Additional
Information Corporate Governance for
additional information on these rules.
Director
Independence Rules
The NYSE Rules require that a majority of the members of the
board of directors of a listed issuer and each member of its
nominating, corporate governance, compensation and audit
committee be independent and stipulate that no
director qualifies as independent unless the board
of directors has made an affirmative determination that the
director has no material direct or indirect relationship with
the listed company. However, under the NYSE Rules a director may
still be deemed independent even if the director or a member of
the directors immediate family has received during a
12 month period within the prior three years up to $120,000
in direct compensation. In addition, a director may also be
deemed independent even if a member of the directors
immediate family works for the companys auditor in a
non-partner capacity and not on the companys audit. By
contrast, the GCGC requires that the Supervisory Board ensure
that proposed candidates are persons with the necessary
knowledge, competencies and applicable experience, and that the
Supervisory Board includes what it considers an adequate number
of independent members. A Supervisory Board member is considered
independent if he or she has no business or personal relations
with SAP or its Executive Board that could give rise to a
conflict of interest. The members of the Supervisory Board must
have enough time to perform their board duties and must carry
out their duties carefully and in good faith. For as long as
they serve, they must comply with the criteria that are
enumerated in relation to the selection of candidates for the
Supervisory Board concerning independence, conflict of interest
and multiple memberships of management, supervisory and other
governing bodies. They must be loyal to SAP in their conduct and
they must not accept appointment in companies that are in
competition with SAP. Supervisory Board members must disclose
any planned non-ordinary course business transactions with SAP
to the Supervisory Board promptly. The Supervisory Board members
cannot carry out such transactions before the Supervisory Board
has given its permission. The Supervisory Board may grant its
permission for any such transaction only if the transaction is
based on terms and conditions that are standard for the type of
transaction in question and if the transaction is not contrary
to SAPs interest. SAP complies with these GCGC director
independence requirements.
German corporate law and the GCGC do not require the Supervisory
Board to make an affirmative determination that individual
directors are independent or that a majority of Supervisory
Board members or the members of a specific committee are
independent.
The NYSE independence requirements are closely linked with risks
specific to unitary boards of directors that are customary for
U.S. companies. In contrast, the two-tier board structure
requires a strict separation of the executive board and
supervisory board. In addition, the supervisory board of large
German stock corporations is subject to the principle of
employee codetermination as outlined in the German
Co-Determination Act of 1976 (Mitbestimmungsgesetz). As a
result, the Supervisory Board of SAP AG consists of 16 members,
of which eight have been elected by SAP AGs shareholders
at the Annual General Meeting and eight members have been
elected by employees of SAP AG and its German subsidiaries.
Typically, the chairperson of the supervisory board is a
shareholder representative. In case of a tie vote, the
supervisory board chairperson may
131
cast the decisive
tie-breaking
vote. This board structure creates a different system of checks
and balances, including employee participation, and cannot be
directly compared with a unitary board system.
Audit Committee
Independence
As a foreign private issuer, the NYSE Rules require SAP to
establish an Audit Committee that satisfies the requirements of
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act with respect to audit committee
independence. SAP is in compliance with these requirements. The
Chairman of SAPs Audit Committee and Mr. Joachim
Milberg, recently elected to the Audit Committee, meet the
independence requirements of
Rule 10A-3
of the Exchange Act. The other two Audit Committee members,
Messrs. Thomas Bamberger and Gerhard Maier, are employee
representatives who are eligible for the exemption provided by
Rule 10
A-3 (b) (1)
(iv) (C) (see Item 16.D for details).
Similar to the Board independence requirements under German
corporate law and the GCGC, supervisory boards are not required
to determine affirmatively that the audit committee members are
independent. Nonetheless, SAP meets the NYSE Rules on audit
committee independence applicable to foreign private issuers.
Rules on
Non-Management Board Meetings are Different
Section 303 A.03 of the NYSE Rules stipulates that the
non-management board of each listed issuer must meet at
regularly scheduled executive sessions without the management.
Under German corporate law and the GCGC the Supervisory Board is
entitled but not required to exclude Executive Board members
from its meetings. The Supervisory Board exercises this right
temporarily during its meetings, for example when it discusses
or decides Executive Board member affairs like the appointment
of new Executive Board members.
Rules on
Establishing Committees Differ
Pursuant to Section 303 A.04 and 303 A.05 of the NYSE Rules
listed companies are required to set up a Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee, each composed
entirely of independent directors and having a written charter
specifying the committees purpose and responsibilities. In
addition, each committees performance must be reviewed
annually. With one exception, German corporate law does not
mandate the creation of specific supervisory board committees.
Required by the German Co-Determination Act of 1976
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), the Mediation Committee
(Vermittlungsausschuss) convenes only if the
2/3
majority required for appointing/revoking the appointment of
Executive Board Members is not attained. This committee has
never been convened in SAPs history. In addition, the GCGC
recommends that the Supervisory Board establish an Audit
Committee and a Nomination Committee. In addition to the legally
required Mediation Committee, SAP has the following committees,
which are in compliance with the GCGC: General Committee,
Compensation Committee, Audit Committee, Strategy and Technology
Committee, Finance and Investment Committee, Nomination
Committee, and Special Committee (See Item 10.
Additional Information Corporate Governance
for more information).
Rules on
Shareholders Compulsory Approval are Different
Section 312 of the NYSE Rules requires U.S. companies
to seek shareholder approval of all equity-compensation plans,
including certain material revisions thereto (subject to certain
exemptions as described in the rules), issuances of common
stock, including convertible stock, if the common stock has, or
will have upon issuance, voting power of or in excess of 20% of
the then outstanding common stock, and issuances of common stock
if they trigger a change of control.
According to the German Stock Corporation Act and other
applicable German laws, shareholder approval is required for a
broad range of matters, such as amendments to the articles of
association, certain
132
significant corporate transactions (including inter-company
agreements and material restructurings), the offering of stock
options and similar equity compensation to its employees by a
way of a conditional capital increase or by using treasury
shares (including significant aspects of such an equity
compensation plan as well as the exercise thresholds), the
issuance of new shares, the authorization to purchase the
corporations own shares, and other material issues, such
as transfers of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the
stock corporation, including shareholdings in subsidiaries.
Specific Principles
of Corporate Governance
Under the NYSE Rules Section 303 A.09 listed companies
must adopt and disclose corporate guidelines. Since October
2007, SAP has applied the recommended corporate governance
standards of the GCGC rather than company-specific principles of
corporate governance. The CGCG recommendations differ from the
NYSE Standards primarily as outlined in this Item 16G.
Specific Code of
Business Conduct
NYSE Rules Section 303 A.10 requires listed companies
to adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for
directors, officers and employees, and to disclose promptly any
waivers of the code for directors or executive officers.
Although not required under German law, SAP has adopted a Code
of Business Conduct, which is equally applicable to employees,
managers and members of the Executive Board. SAP complies with
the requirement to disclose the Code of Business Conduct and any
waivers of the code with respect to directors and executive
officers.
PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Reference is made to pages F-1 through F-95, incorporated herein
by reference.
The following consolidated financial statements are filed as
part of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended 2008, 2007
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Annual
Report on
Form 20-F:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation (Satzung) of SAP AG, as amended
to date (English
translation).(1)
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Form of global share certificate for ordinary shares (English
translation).(1)
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Form of American Depositary
Receipt.(2)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement among SAP AG,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Depositary, and
all owners and holders from time to time of American Depositary
Receipts issued thereunder, including the form of American
Depositary Receipts, dated as of December 3,
2004.(3)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 20, 2006 to
Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement among SAP AG, Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as Depository, and all owners
and holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts
issued thereunder, including the form of American Depositary
Receipts.(2)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Tender Offer Agreement dated as of October 7, 2007 between
SAP AG and Business Objects
S.A.(4)
|
|
4
|
.3.1
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of October 22,
2007 between SAP AG and SAP France
S.A.(4)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement relating to the
5,000,000,000 (subsequently reduced to
2,947,679,513.45) Syndicated Multicurrency Term Loan
Facility Agreement dated October 1, 2007 by and among SAP
AG (Borrower), Deutsche Bank AG, ABN Amro Bank N.V.,
Niederlassung Deutschland, BNP Paribas S.A., Commerzbank
Aktiengesellschaft, J.P. Morgan plc and Sumitomo Mitsui
Banking Corporation (Mandated Lead Arrangers), Deutsche Bank AG
Paris Branch (Offer Guarantor), Deutsche Bank Luxemburg S.A.
(Agent) and Certain Financial Institutions
(Lenders).(5)
|
|
4
|
.4.1
|
|
Accession Agreement relating to the 5,000,000,000
(subsequently reduced to 2,947,679,513.45) Syndicated
Multicurrency Term Loan Facility Agreement dated October 1,
2007 by and among SAP AG (Borrower), Deutsche Bank AG, ABN Amro
Bank N.V., Niederlassung Deutscheland, BNP PARIBAS S.A.,
Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, J.P. Morgan plc and
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (Mandated Lead Arrangers),
Deutsche Bank AG Paris Branch (Offer Guarantor), certain
financial institutions (Existing Lenders), certain financial
institutions (New Lenders), and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A.
(Agent).(5)
|
|
8
|
|
|
Subsidiaries, Equity Method Investments, and Other Investments
of SAP AG.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Henning Kagermann, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Léo Apotheker, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
12
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Werner Brandt, Chief Financial Officer,
required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
or
Rule 15d-14(a).
|
|
13
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Henning Kagermann, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
13
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Léo Apotheker, Co-Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
13
|
.3
|
|
Certification of Werner Brandt, Chief Financial Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
15
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
of SAP AG filed on March 22, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Post Effective Amendment No. 1
to
Form F-6
filed on December 20, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on
Form 6-K
of SAP AG, filed on December 13, 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Tender Offer Statement on
Schedule TO filed with the SEC by SAP France S.A. on
December 4, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
of SAP AG filed on April 2, 2008. |
134
SIGNATURES
The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
SAP AG
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
|
HENNING
KAGERMANN
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Henning Kagermann
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 26, 2009
Name: Léo Apotheker
Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 26, 2009
Name: Dr. Werner Brandt
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Dated March 26, 2009
135
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of SAP AG:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
SAP AG and subsidiaries (SAP or the
Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders
equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of SAP as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
SAPs internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), and our report dated March 25, 2009 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of SAPs internal
control over financial reporting.
KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Mannheim, Germany
March 25, 2009
F-1
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
for
the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions, unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
Software revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,019
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
Support revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,393
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Software and software-related service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,771
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
7,427
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
Consulting revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
Training revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Other service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Professional services and other service revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
16,097
|
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
10,242
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software and software-related services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
|
(1,310
|
)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
Cost of professional services and other services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,196
|
)
|
|
|
(2,296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091
|
)
|
|
|
(2,073
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
|
|
(1,458
|
)
|
|
|
(1,335
|
)
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,540
|
)
|
|
|
(2,162
|
)
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
General and administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
Other operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,144
|
)
|
|
|
(8,725
|
)
|
|
|
(7,510
|
)
|
|
|
(6,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-operating income/expense, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Financial income/expense, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
|
|
(825
|
)
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations
basic in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations
diluted in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
Earnings per share from net income basic
in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
Earnings per share from net income diluted
in
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2008 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.3919 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2008.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
as
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
3,128
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Prepaid expenses/deferred charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
|
|
|
5,782
|
|
|
|
6,408
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
6,972
|
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Prepaid expenses/deferred charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,713
|
|
|
|
8,415
|
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,761
|
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
Income tax obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
3,583
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Deferred Income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,120
|
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
|
|
3,199
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Income tax obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,690
|
|
|
|
6,962
|
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock, no par values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
Authorized Not issued or outstanding:
480 million at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Issued and outstanding:
1.226 million and 1.246 million shares at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
(1,734
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,730
|
|
|
|
7,709
|
|
|
|
7,159
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
10,068
|
|
|
|
7,233
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,761
|
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2008 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.3919 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2008.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
for
the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
income/loss
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
5,980
|
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
5,782
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
Other comprehensive income/loss, net of tax
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/loss
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
Cancellation of treasury stock
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other treasury stock transactions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(967
|
)
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
Other comprehensive income/loss, net of tax
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/loss
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
Cancellation of treasury stock
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other treasury stock transactions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(1,734
|
)
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
Other comprehensive income/loss, net of tax
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/loss
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
Cancellation of treasury stock
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other treasury stock transactions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Convertible bonds and stock options exercised
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
7,709
|
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
7,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Statement is an integral part
of Note 20.
F-4
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
for
the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains/losses on marketable securities
(tax 2008: 1; 2007: 0; 2006: 0)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments on marketable securities for
gains/losses included in net income
(tax 2008: -1; 2007: 0; 2006: -1)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized pension costs
(tax 2008: 19; 2007: 1; 2006: 2)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency cash flow hedge and interest rate
hedge gains/losses
(tax 2008: 13; 2007: -6; 2006: -15)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Reclassification foreign currency cash flow hedge and interest
rate hedge adjustments for gains/losses included in net
income
(tax 2008: 9; 2007: 4; 2006: 4)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized foreign currency cash flow hedge and interest
rate hedge gains/losses
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on STAR hedge
(tax 2008: -11; 2007: -3; 2006: -13)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Reclassification adjustments on STAR hedge for gains included in
net income
(tax 2008: 6; 2007: 9; 2006: 39)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on STAR hedge
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency effects from intercompany long-term investment
transactions
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on income and expense items recognized directly in
equity
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/loss
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for
the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
millions
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before minority
interests
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations
before minority interests to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Gains/losses from equity investees
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gains/losses on disposal of intangible assets and property,
plant, and equipment
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Gains on disposal of investments
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Writedowns of financial assets
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(40
|
|
Impacts of hedging for cash-settled share-based payment plans
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Share-based compensation including income tax benefits
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(93
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Change in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Change in accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Change in deferred income
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
3,039
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of minority interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Business combinations, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
|
(5,252
|
)
|
|
|
(3,773
|
)
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
Repayment of acquirees debt in business combinations
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of intangible assets and property, plant,
and equipment
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Cash transferred to restricted cash
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Use of restricted cash
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
|
|
(2,055
|
)
|
Sales of investments
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
Purchase of other financial assets
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Sales of other financial assets
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(5,246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,769
|
)
|
|
|
(1,392
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock (share-based compensation)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Repayment of bonds
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Proceeds from short-term and long-term debt
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Repayments of short-term and long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Proceeds from the exercise of equity-based derivative
instruments (STAR hedge)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Purchase of equity-based derivative instruments (hedge for
cash-settled share-based payment plans)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/used in financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
335
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2008 figures have been
translated solely for the convenience of the reader at an
exchange rate of US$1.3919 to 1.00, the Noon Buying Rate
certified by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on
December 31, 2008.
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
SAP AG AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of SAP AG and
its subsidiaries (collectively, we, our,
SAP, Group, or Company) have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP).
We are an international corporation with headquarters in
Walldorf, Germany. We develop, market, and sell a variety of
software solutions, primarily enterprise application software
products for organizations including corporations, government
agencies, and educational institutions. We also offer support,
consulting, training and other services related to our software
offering. For more information, see Note 28.
Certain amounts reported prior to 2007 were reclassified to
conform to the new presentation in 2007. In the first quarter of
2007 we changed the presentation of our consolidated statements
of income. We believe that the new presentation shows more
transparently our potential new revenue streams. We renamed what
we previously called Maintenance revenue to Support revenue; we
renamed what we previously called Software and maintenance
revenue to Software and software-related service revenue; and we
now show Subscriptions and other software-related service
revenue as a separate component within Software and
software-related service revenue. This new item includes revenue
from subscriptions, software rentals and time-based licenses,
hosted and other on-demand solutions, and other software-related
services. We also renamed what we previously called Service
revenue to Professional services revenue. Furthermore, we now
show revenue from Other services as an additional item within
Professional services revenue. Finally, we reclassified and
renamed various expense categories to correspond with the
revised revenue items. For more information, see Note 5.
Amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements are
reported in millions of euros (millions) unless
otherwise stated.
Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may
not add up precisely to the totals we provide and percentages
may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.
Except as otherwise indicated, the information presented in
these Notes refers to our continuing operations. See
Note 11 for further information about our discontinued
operations.
We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that
involves numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are
beyond our control. We derive a substantial portion of our
revenue from software licenses and software-related services
sold to customers in Germany, the United States, the United
Kingdom, France, and Japan. Our future revenue and income may be
adversely affected by a prolonged economic slowdown in any of
these countries or elsewhere. For example, the current global
financial crisis and general uncertainty in global economic
conditions has caused, and may in the future cause, reduction
and deferral in demand for our products, negatively impacting
our business, results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows. Global economic conditions may worsen in the future,
exacerbating this negative impact. This deterioration of the
global economic conditions could make it increasingly difficult
for us to accurately forecast demand for our products and
services, and could cause our revenue and operating results to
fall short of expectations. Other risk factors include
consolidation and intense competition in the software industry
and in customer demand.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in euros,
which is the functional currency of SAP AG. However, because a
significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies
other than the euro, our reported financial results are affected
by foreign currency exchange rate changes. We continually
monitor our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk and have
a Company-wide foreign currency exchange risk policy under which
we may hedge such risks with certain financial instruments.
However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,
especially the value of the U.S. dollar, pound sterling,
Japanese yen, Swiss franc,
F-7
Canadian dollar, and Australian dollar could significantly
impact our reported financial position and results of operations.
|
|
(2)
|
SCOPE OF
CONSOLIDATION
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements include SAP AG and all
entities that are controlled directly or indirectly by SAP AG.
We fully consolidate one entity in which we hold only 49% of the
voting shares, due to an agreement with the majority shareholder
which provides that SAP fully controls the entity, receives all
benefits and incurs all risks. All other consolidated entities
are majority-owned.
All SAP entities prepare their financial statements as at
December 31. All financial statements were prepared
applying the same Group U.S. GAAP accounting and valuation
principles. Intercompany transactions and balances relating to
consolidated entities have been eliminated.
The following table summarizes the change in the number of legal
entities included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview of Legal
Entities Consolidated in the Financial Statements
The changes in the scope of companies included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements during 2008 have an effect on
the comparability of the Consolidated Financial Statements
presented. The additions relate to legal entities added in
connection with acquisitions. The disposals are due to mergers
and liquidations of consolidated or acquired legal entities. For
additional information on our acquisitions and the effect on our
Consolidated Financial Statements please see Note 4.
Associates
Companies in which we do not have a controlling financial
interest but over which we can exercise significant operating
and financial influence (associates) are accounted for using the
equity method.
|
|
(3)
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In making
our estimates, we consider historical and forecast information,
as well as regional and industry economic conditions in which
the Company or its customers operate, changes to which could
adversely affect our estimates, in particular when assessing
revenues and costs, the valuation and recoverability of
receivables, investments and other assets, tax positions,
provisions and contingent liabilities. Actual results could
differ from original estimates.
F-8
Basis of Measurement
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared based
on the historical cost basis except for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments,
available-for-sale
financial assets and liabilities for cash-settled share-based
payment arrangements are measured at fair value;
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange receivables and payables are translated at
period-end exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
Pensions are measured according to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158
(SFAS 158), Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,
as described in Note 19a.
|
Where applicable, information about the methods and assumptions
used in determining the respective measurement bases and fair
values is disclosed in the Notes specific to that asset or
liability.
Business Combinations
We account for all business combinations using the purchase
method. We allocate the purchase price to the fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of
acquisition. The results of operations of acquired entities are
included in our Consolidated Statements of Income beginning at
the respective acquisition date.
Foreign Currencies
The functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their local
currencies. The assets and liabilities of our foreign operations
where the functional currency is not the euro are translated
into euros using period-end closing exchange rates. Items of
income and expense are translated into euros using average
exchange rates during the respective periods. The resulting
foreign currency translation adjustments are included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (SOCI). Currency
effects from intercompany long-term investments relate to
intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a
long-term investment nature and are also included in Accumulated
other comprehensive income/loss in the SOCI. When a foreign
operation is disposed of, the foreign currency translation
adjustments applicable to that entity are recognized in profit
or loss.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the
respective functional currencies of Group entities at the
exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets
and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies other
than the functional currency are remeasured at the period-end
closing rate with resulting gains and losses reflected in Other
non-operating income/expense, net in the Consolidated Statements
of Income.
Operating cash flows are translated into euros using average
exchange rates during the respective periods. Investing and
financing cash flows are translated into euros using the
exchange rates in effect at the time of the respective
transaction. The effects on cash due to fluctuations in exchange
rates are shown in a separate line in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
F-9
Exchange Rates
The exchange rates of key currencies affecting the Company were
as follows:
Exchange
Rates
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues from the sale or license of our software
products and of support, subscription, consulting, development,
training, and other services. The vast majority of our software
arrangements include support services and many also include
professional services and other elements.
Software and software-related service revenue as shown in our
Consolidated Statements of Income is the sum of our software
revenue, support revenue, and revenue from subscriptions and
other software-related services. Professional services and other
service revenue as shown in our Consolidated Statements of
Income is the sum of our consulting revenue, training revenue,
and other service revenue. Other revenue as shown in our
Consolidated Statements of Income consists of income from SAP
marketing events. Revenue information by segment and geographic
region is disclosed in Note 28.
Software revenue represents fees earned from the sale or license
of software to customers. Support revenue represents fees earned
from providing customers with unspecified future software
updates, upgrades, and enhancements, and technical product
support. We recognize support revenues ratably over the term of
the support service contract, usually one year. We do not
separately sell technical support services or unspecified
software upgrades, updates, and enhancements. Accordingly, we do
not distinguish within Software and software-related service
revenue or within Cost of software and software-related services
the amounts attributable to technical support services and
unspecified software upgrades, updates, and enhancements.
Subscription and other software-related service revenue
represents fees earned from subscription and software rental
arrangements, on-demand solutions, and other software-related
services. Subscription contracts have both software and support
service elements as they provide the customer with current
software products, rights to receive unspecified software
products in the future, and rights to support services.
Customers pay an annual fee for a defined subscription term,
usually five years, and we recognize such fees ratably over the
term of the arrangement beginning with the delivery of the first
product. Software rental contracts also have both software and
support service elements. Such contracts, sometimes referred to
as time-based license contracts, provide the customer with
current software products and support but not the right to
receive unspecified software products in the future. We
recognize fees from software rental contracts ratably over the
term of the arrangement. Revenue from on-demand solutions relate
to hosted contracts that provide the customer with the right to
use certain software functionality but not the right to exit the
contract or take possession of the software without significant
penalty. On-demand solution revenues are recognized ratably over
the term of the arrangement. Other software-related services
revenue mainly consists of software-related revenue-sharing
agreements.
We recognize consulting, training, and other professional
services revenues when the respective services are performed.
Consulting revenue primarily results from implementation support
contracts to install and
F-10
configure our software products. Such contracts do not usually
involve significant production, modification, or customization
of software so the consulting revenues are recognized on a
time-and-materials
basis or using the proportional performance method of
accounting. Training revenue results from contracts to provide
educational services to customers and partners regarding the use
of our software products.
Other service revenue consists of fees from non-mandatory
hosting contracts, application management services (AMS) and
referral fees. Non-mandatory hosting contracts allow the
customer to exit the arrangement at any time and to take
possession of the software without significant penalty. Our AMS
contracts provide post-implementation application support,
optimization, and improvements to a customers SAP-centric
IT solution to ensure availability and performance of the
customers business processes. Fees from referral services
are commissions from partners to which we have referred
customers.
We recognize revenue pursuant to the requirements of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement of Position
97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
(SOP 97-2),
as amended. Revenue on multiple-element arrangements is
recognized using the residual method of revenue recognition when
company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all
of the undelivered elements (for example, support services,
consulting, or other services) in the arrangement, but does not
exist for one or more delivered elements (generally software).
We allocate revenue to each undelivered element based on its
respective company-specific objective evidence of fair value
which is the price charged when that element is sold separately
or, for elements not yet sold separately, the price established
by our management if it is probable that the price will not
change before the element is sold separately. We allocate
revenue to undelivered support services based on company-wide
rates charged to renew the support services annually after an
initial period. Such renewal rates generally represent a fixed
currency amount or a fixed percentage of the discounted software
license fee charged to the customer; the vast majority of our
customers renew their annual support service contract at these
rates. We allocate revenue to future incremental discounts
whenever customers are granted the right to license additional
software at a higher discount than the one given for the initial
software license arrangement or to purchase or renew support or
services at rates below VSOE of fair value of the respective
service as we believe such discounts are significant regardless
of quantitative magnitude. We defer revenue for all undelivered
elements and recognize the residual amount of the arrangement
fee attributable to the delivered elements, if any, when the
basic criteria in
SOP 97-2
have been met.
Under
SOP 97-2,
provided that the arrangement does not involve significant
production, modification, or customization of the software,
software revenue is recognized when all of the following four
criteria have been met:
1. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists
2. Delivery has occurred,
3. The fee is fixed or determinable, and
4. Collectibility is probable.
If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that the
arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is
deferred until the arrangement fee becomes due and payable by
the customer. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine
that collectibility is not probable, revenue is deferred until
payment is received. Almost none of our software license
agreements include acceptance testing provisions. If an
arrangement allows for customer acceptance testing of the
software, we defer revenue until the earlier of customer
acceptance or when the acceptance right lapses.
We usually sell or license software on a perpetual basis.
Occasionally, we license software for a specified time. Revenue
from short-term time-based licenses, which usually include
support services during the license period, is recognized
ratably over the license term. We allocate a portion of
short-term time-based license fees to support revenue based on
the estimated fair value of the support services and allocate
the remaining (residual) amount to software revenue. Revenue
from multi-year time-based licenses that include support
services,
F-11
whether separately priced or not, is recognized ratably over the
license term unless a substantive support service renewal rate
exists, in which case the amount allocated to the delivered
software based on the residual method is recognized as software
revenue once the basic criteria in
SOP 97-2
have been met.
We recognize revenue from arrangements involving resellers on
evidence of sell-through by the reseller to the end-customer. We
have a history of honoring contingent rights if we become aware
that a reseller has granted contingent rights to an
end-customer, although we have no contractual obligation to do
so. Accordingly, we do not recognize revenue for arrangements
involving resellers until the earlier of the point at which a
valid license agreement without contingencies has been agreed
with the end-customer or the contingencies expire.
In multiple-element arrangements involving software and
consulting, training, or other professional services that are
not essential to the functionality of the software, the service
revenues are accounted for separately from the software
revenues. Revenues for arrangements that involve significant
production, modification, or customization of the software and
those in which the services are not available from third-party
vendors and are therefore deemed essential to the software, are
recognized, depending on the fee structure, on a
time-and-material
basis or using the percentage of completion method, based on
direct labor costs incurred to date as a percentage of total
estimated project costs required to complete the project. If we
do not have a sufficient basis to measure the progress of
completion or to estimate the total contract revenues and costs,
revenue and costs are deferred until the project is complete
and, if applicable, final acceptance is received from the
customer. If the arrangement includes elements that do not
qualify for contract accounting (for example support services
and hosting) such elements are accounted for separately provided
that the elements have stand-alone value and that
company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. When
total cost estimates exceed revenues in an arrangement, the
estimated losses are recognized immediately based on an average
fully burdened daily rate applicable to the unit delivering the
services, which consists of costs allocable to the arrangement.
Sometimes we enter into joint development agreements with
customers to leverage their industry expertise and provide
standard software solutions for selected vertical markets. These
customers generally contribute cash, resources, and industry
expertise in exchange for license rights for the future
solution. We recognize software revenue in conjunction with
these arrangements based on the percentage of completion method.
If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure the progress
towards completion, revenue is recognized when the project is
complete and, if applicable, final acceptance is received from
the customer. When total cost estimates exceed revenues in an
arrangement, the estimated losses are recognized immediately
based on an average fully burdened daily rate applicable to the
unit delivering the services, which consists of costs allocable
to the arrangement.
The assumptions, risks, and uncertainties inherent in the
application of the percentage of completion method and the
proportional performance method affect the timing and amounts of
revenues and expenses reported. Numerous internal and external
factors can affect estimates including direct labor rates,
utilization, and efficiency variances. Changes in estimates of
SAPs progress towards completion and of contract revenues
and contract costs are accounted for as cumulative
catch-up
adjustments to the reported revenues for the applicable contract.
We account for
out-of-pocket
expenses invoiced by SAP and reimbursed by customers as support,
consulting, and training revenues, depending on the nature of
the service for which the
out-of-pocket
expenses were incurred.
If a customer is specifically identified as a bad debtor, we
stop recognizing revenue except to the extent of fees that have
already been collected.
We record sales net of applicable sales taxes.
F-12
Research and
Development
Development activities involve a plan or design for the
production of new or substantially improved products. We have
determined that technological feasibility for our software
products is reached shortly before the products are available
for sale. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is
established have not been material. Consequently, all research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Government Grants
We record government grants when it is reasonably assured that
we will comply with the relevant conditions and that the grant
will be received. Our government grants generally represent
subsidies for activities specified in the grant. As a result,
government grants are recognized as a reduction of the related
expense when earned.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are included in sales and marketing expense
and are expensed as incurred. Our contributions to resellers
that allow our resellers to execute qualified and approved
marketing activities are recognized as an offset to revenue
unless we obtain a separate identifiable benefit for the
contribution and the fair value of the benefit is reasonably
estimable.
Leases
We are a lessee of property, plant, and equipment, mainly
buildings and vehicles, under operating leases that do not
transfer to us the substantive risks and rewards of ownership.
Rent expense on operating leases is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease including renewal
terms if, at inception of the lease, renewal is reasonably
assured.
Some of our operating leases contain lessee incentives, such as
up-front payments of costs or free or reduced periods of rent.
The incentives are amortized over the life of the lease and the
rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
life of the lease. The same applies to contractually agreed
future increases of rents.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and on tax loss and
tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in profit or
loss in the period that includes the enactment date.
We reduce deferred income tax assets by a valuation allowance to
the extent that it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Interest and penalties on income taxes are classified as income
tax expense.
Since 2007 we have applied Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109
(FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. Uncertain income tax positions
F-13
result in the recognition of tax provisions or the decrease of
recognized tax assets based on the recognition threshold and
measurement attributes of FIN 48. The benefit of a tax
position is recognized only when it is more likely than not that
the tax position will be sustained, based on the technical
merits of the position, by a taxing authority having full
knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets
the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured as
the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50%
likely of being realized on settlement with the taxing
authority. For more information, see Note 10.
Share-Based
Compensation
Share-based compensation covers cash-settled and equity-settled
awards issued to employees. We account for these awards
according to SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)).
Equity-settled awards are measured at grant-date fair values
determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model.
Such awards are not subsequently remeasured. The grant-date fair
value of equity-settled awards is recognized as personnel
expense on a straight-line basis over the period in which the
employees become unconditionally entitled to the options, with a
corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. The amount
recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual
number of share options that ultimately vest.
The fair value of cash-settled awards is recognized as personnel
expense using the accelerated attribution method over the period
in which the employees become unconditionally entitled to
payment with a corresponding increase in liabilities.
Cash-settled awards are remeasured to fair value at each balance
sheet date until the award is settled. Any changes in the fair
value of the liability are recognized as personnel expense in
profit or loss. The fair values for hedged programs are based on
market data reflecting current market expectations.
For more information about our share-based compensation plans,
see Note 27.
Comprehensive
Income/Loss
Comprehensive income is comprised of Net income and Other
comprehensive income/loss.
Other comprehensive income/loss includes foreign currency
translation adjustments, unrealized gains and losses from
intercompany long-term investment transactions, unrecognized
pension cost, gains and losses from derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges, gains and losses resulting from share-based
compensation hedges, and unrealized gains and losses from debt
securities and marketable equity securities classified as
available-for-sale.
Other comprehensive income/loss and comprehensive income are
displayed separately in the SOCI as well as in Note 20.
Earnings per Share
We present basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS). Basic
earnings per share is determined by dividing consolidated income
from continuing operations, income/loss from discontinued
operations and net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect
the potential dilution that would occur if all in the
money securities to issue common shares were exercised or
converted.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash at banks and highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less.
F-14
Investments
Investments with original maturities of greater than three
months and remaining maturities of less than one year are
classified as short-term investments. Investments with
maturities beyond one year may be classified as short term based
on their highly liquid nature and because such marketable
securities represent the investment of cash that is available
for current operations.
Marketable debt and equity securities, other than investments
accounted for by the equity method, are classified as
available-for-sale.
Securities classified as
available-for-sale
are accounted for at fair value with unrealized gains and losses
being excluded from profit or loss and reported net of tax as a
component of Other comprehensive income within
shareholders equity. Gains or losses realized on sales of
securities classified as
available-for-sale
are based on the average-cost method. We do not hold securities
for trading purposes or to maturity, respectively.
Equity investments in privately held companies over which we do
not have the ability to exercise significant influence or
control are accounted for at cost. Gains or losses realized on
sales of such investments are based on the average-cost method.
Investments accounted for under the equity method are initially
recorded at acquisition cost and are subsequently adjusted for
our proportionate share of the investees profit or loss,
changes in the investees equity and for amortization of
any step-up
in the value of the acquired assets over the investees
book value. The excess of our initial investment in equity
method companies over our ownership percentage in the underlying
net assets of those companies is attributed to certain fair
value adjustments with the remaining portion recognized as
goodwill (investor level goodwill), which is not
amortized.
All investments are evaluated for impairment at least annually
or if we become aware of an event that indicates that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. To
determine whether a decline in value below the carrying amount
of an asset is
other-than-temporary,
we consider whether we have the ability and intent to hold a
debt instrument until a market price recovery occurs or whether
evidence indicating that the carrying value of the investment is
recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. Evidence
considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the
decline in fair value, the severity and duration of the decline
in realizable value below cost, changes in value subsequent to
the balance sheet date, as well as forecasted performance of the
investee. If a decline in value below the carrying amount is
determined to be
other-than-temporary,
the asset is written down to fair value through an impairment
charge recognized in Financial income, net and a new cost basis
is established.
Dividend income is recognized when earned. Interest income is
recognized based on the effective interest method.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amounts less sales
allowances and an allowance for doubtful accounts. Included in
accounts receivable are unbilled receivables related to
fixed-fee and
time-and-material
consulting arrangements. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our
existing accounts receivable portfolio. We determine the
allowance for doubtful accounts using a two-step approach:
First, we consider the financial solvency of specific customers
and record an allowance for specific customer balances when we
believe it is probable that we will not collect the amount due
according to the contractual terms of the arrangement. Second,
we evaluate homogenous portfolios of receivables according to
their default risk primarily based on the age of the receivable
and historical loss experience, but also taking into
consideration general market factors such as the current
economic crisis and how that might impact our receivable
portfolio. We record an allowance for a portfolio of receivables
when we believe it is probable that a loss has occurred or that
we will not collect some or all of the amounts due. Account
balances are charged off against the allowance after all
collection efforts have been exhausted and the likelihood of
recovery is considered remote. Allowances for a portfolio of
receivables are recorded as Other operating
F-15
income/expense whereas allowances for specific customer balances
are recorded in Cost of software and software related services
or Cost of professional services and other services, depending
on the transaction to which the receivable relates. As accounts
receivable do not bear interest, we discount receivables with a
term exceeding one year to their present value using local
market interest rates.
Financial and Other
Assets
Included in Other financial assets are non-derivative and
derivative financial assets. Other non-derivative financial
assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted
in an active market are generally measured at amortized cost
which approximates fair value either due to their short-term
nature or due to the inclusion of interest. Non-interest-bearing
or below-market-rate loans to employees and to third parties are
discounted to the present value of estimated future cash flows.
In the event of any delay or shortfall in payments due under
employee or third-party loans, we perform an individual loan
review to determine whether any impairment exists. The same
applies if we become aware of any change in the debtors
financial condition that indicates a delay or shortfall in
payments may result. If it is probable that we will not be able
to collect the amounts due according to the terms of the loan
agreement an impairment charge is recorded on an allowance
account based on our best estimate of the amount that will not
be recoverable. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance after all collection efforts have been exhausted and
the likelihood of recovery is considered remote.
Investments held for employee-financed postemployment plans are
recorded at their cash surrender values or fair market values
depending on the assets held. Other assets are recorded at
historical cost which approximates fair value due to their
short-term nature or the inclusion of interest.
Inventories, consisting primarily of costs for office supplies
and documentation, are immaterial to us and are therefore
included in Other assets. We record inventories at the lower of
purchase or production cost and market value. Production costs
consist of direct salaries, materials, and production overhead.
Derivatives with positive fair values are recorded as an asset.
For further information on derivatives see section
Derivatives.
Derivatives
We account for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance
with SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), which requires
all derivative financial instruments be recorded on the balance
sheet at fair value.
Derivatives without
designated hedge relationship
Many transactions constitute economic hedges and therefore
contribute effectively to the securing of financial risks but do
not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. For the
hedging of currency risks inherent in foreign currency
denominated, recognized monetary assets and liabilities we do
not designate our derivative financial instruments as accounting
hedges as the realized profits and losses from the underlying
transactions are recognized in profit or loss at the same time
as the realized profits and losses from the derivatives used as
hedging instruments. Derivatives without a designated hedge
relationship for the economic hedging of interest rate risks are
classified as held for trading and recorded at fair value
through profit or loss.
Embedded derivatives
We occasionally have contracts that require payment streams in
currencies other than the functional currency of either party to
the contract. Such embedded foreign currency derivatives are
separated from the host contract and accounted for separately if
the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and
the embedded derivative are not closely related, a separate
instrument with the same terms as the embedded
F-16
derivative would meet the definition of a derivative, and the
combined instrument is not measured at fair value through profit
or loss.
Derivatives with
designated hedge relationship (cash-flow hedge)
Derivatives which meet the requirements for hedge accounting as
set out in SFAS 133 and which are part of an effective
hedging relationship are initially recorded at their fair value.
We designate and document the hedge relationship including the
nature of the risk, the identification of the hedged item, the
hedging instrument, and how we will assess the hedge
effectiveness. Subsequently, derivatives within a hedging
relationship are accounted for at fair values. The accounting
for changes in fair value of the hedging instrument depends on
the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. The effective
portion of the unrealized gain or loss on the derivative
component included in the cash-flow hedge relationship (included
component) is reported net of tax in Other comprehensive
income/loss. We subsequently reclassify the portion of gains or
losses on the included component from equity to profit or loss
when a financial asset or liability is recognized. The
ineffective portion of gains or losses on the included component
as well as all fair value changes resulting from the excluded
components are reported in profit or loss. For detailed
information on our hedges, see Note 25.
Valuation and
testing of effectiveness
Derivatives are recorded at fair value in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The fair value of the derivatives is calculated
by discounting the expected future cash flows using relevant
interest rates and spot rates over the remaining term of the
contracts.
Gains or losses on the spot price and the intrinsic values of
the derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges
are recognized net of tax directly in Other comprehensive
income/loss within shareholders equity whereas gains and
losses on the interest element and on the time values excluded
from the hedging relationship are recognized in profit or loss
immediately.
The effectiveness of the hedging relationship is tested
prospectively and retrospectively. Prospectively, we apply the
critical terms match for our foreign currency hedges as
currencies, maturity and the amounts are identical for the
forecasted transactions and the spot element of the forward
exchange rate contract or intrinsic value of the currency
options, respectively. For interest rate swaps, we also apply
the critical terms match as the notional amounts, currencies,
maturity, basis of the variable leg (EURIBOR), reset dates and
the dates of the interest and principal payments are identical
for the debt instrument and the corresponding interest rate
swaps. Therefore, over the life of the hedging instrument, the
changes in cash flows of the hedging relationship components
will offset the impact of fluctuations of the underlying
forecasted transactions.
Retrospectively, effectiveness is tested on a cumulative basis
applying the Dollar Offset Method by using the Hypothetical
Derivative Method. Under this approach, the change in fair value
of a constructed hypothetical derivative whose terms reflect
those of the hedged item is compared to the change in the fair
value of the hedging instrument based on the relevant spot rates
at the time of hedge designation and the actual spot rates. The
hedge is deemed highly effective if the results are within a
range of 80% to 125%.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity
over the fair values assigned to the tangible assets acquired,
to those intangible assets that are required to be recognized
and reported separately from goodwill, and to the liabilities
assumed.
We do not amortize goodwill but test it for impairment at least
annually and when events occur or changes in circumstances
indicate the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its
carrying value. In respect to at-equity investments, the
carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount
of the investment.
F-17
Other Intangible
Assets
Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are
recorded at acquisition cost, amortized on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful life of two to 16 years. All of
our intangible assets, with the exception of goodwill, have
finite useful lives and are therefore subject to amortization.
We expense immediately the fair value of acquired identifiable
in-process research and development (in-process
R&D), which represents acquired research and
development efforts that have not reached technological
feasibility and that have no alternative future use.
Property, Plant, and
Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are carried at acquisition cost
plus the fair value of related asset retirement costs, if any
and if reasonably estimable and less accumulated depreciation.
Interest incurred during the construction of qualifying assets
is capitalized and amortized over the related assets
estimated useful lives.
Property, plant, and equipment are generally depreciated using
the straight-line method. Land is not depreciated.
Useful lives
Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line
method over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful
life of the asset. If a renewal option exists, the depreciation
period reflects the additional time covered by the option if
exercise is reasonably assured when the leasehold improvement is
first put into operation.
Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets, such as property, plant, equipment,
and acquired intangible assets for impairment, whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. We assess
recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing their
carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted net cash
flows the asset or related asset group are expected to generate.
If an asset or group of assets is considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds fair
value.
Assets and
Liabilities Held for Sale
Long-lived assets and disposal groups, which represent assets to
be disposed of together as a group in a single transaction and
liabilities directly associated with those assets that we will
also transfer in the transaction, are classified as held for
sale beginning in the period we commit to sell the assets or
disposal group as long as certain criteria are met including
that the assets or disposal group are available for immediate
sale in their present condition, that the sale of the assets or
disposal group is probable and expected to be completed within
one year, that we are actively seeking a buyer and that changes
to the sales plan are unlikely. Long-lived assets and disposal
groups held for sale are presented separately in the
consolidated balance sheets and reported at the
F-18
lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Long-lived assets held for sale are not depreciated from the
date they are no longer classified as held for use.
Discontinued
Operations
Discontinued operations are reported when one of our components
comprising operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished from the rest of SAP, operationally and for
financial reporting purposes, have been disposed of or are
classified as held for sale, and when both of the following
criteria are met (1) the operations and cash flows of the
component will be (or have been) eliminated from the ongoing
operations of SAP as a result of the disposal transaction and
(2) we will not have any significant continuing involvement
in the operations of the component after the disposal
transaction.
Prepaid Expenses and
Deferred Charges
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges primarily consist of
prepayments of operating leases, support services and software
royalties which will be charged to expense in future periods.
Pension Benefit
Liabilities
We measure our pension-benefit liabilities based on actuarial
computations using the
projected-unit-credit
method in accordance with SFAS 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158), and
SFAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions
(SFAS 87). The assumptions used to calculate
pension liabilities and costs are shown in Note 19a.
SFAS 158 requires the recognition of an asset or liability
for the overfunded or underfunded status of the respective
defined benefit plan. Changes in the amount of the projected
benefit obligation or plan assets resulting from demographic and
financial data different than originally assumed and from
changes in assumptions can result in actuarial gains and losses
not yet recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Amortization of an unrecognized net gain or loss is included as
a component of our net periodic benefit plan cost for a year if,
as of the beginning of the year, that unrecognized net gain or
loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit
obligation or the fair value of that plans assets. In that
case, the amount of amortization recognized is the resulting
excess divided by the average remaining service period of the
active employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. If
unrecognized net gains or losses do not exceed 10% of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of
that plans assets these unrecognized net gains and losses
are recognized as a separate component of other comprehensive
income (OCI) net of tax.
SAPs pension benefits are classified as defined
contribution plans if the payment to a separate fund relieves
SAP of all obligations from the pension plan. Obligations for
contributions to defined contribution pension plans are
recognized as an expense in profit or loss when they become due.
Provisions
Provisions are recorded when we have a legal or constructive
obligation to third parties as a result of a past event, the
amount can be reasonably estimated and it is probable that there
will be an outflow of future economic benefits. We regularly
adjust provisions for loss contingencies as further information
develops or circumstances change. Noncurrent provisions are
reported at the present value of their expected settlement
amounts as at the balance sheet date. Discount rates are
regularly adjusted to current market interest rates. Any legal
costs expected to be incurred in connection with litigation
cases are expensed as incurred.
Our software contracts usually contain general warranty
provisions guaranteeing that the software will perform according
to SAPs stated specifications for six to twelve months. At
the time of the sale or license of our software covered by such
warranty provisions, we record an accrual for warranty costs
based on the historical average cost of fulfilling our
obligations and we classify these as a current obligation.
F-19
A provision for restructuring is recognized when we have
approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan and the
restructuring has commenced or has been announced. Restructuring
liabilities resulting from business combinations are recognized
upon acquisition as part of the purchase price allocation in
accordance with
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination.
Accounts Payable,
Financial and Other Liabilities
Trade payables due within one year are recognized at invoiced
amounts and trade payables due beyond one year are discounted to
present value based on prevailing market rates adjusted for
credit risk.
Derivatives with negative fair values are recorded as a
liability. For further information on derivatives see section
Derivatives.
Deferred Income
Deferred income consists mainly of prepayments made by our
customers for support services and professional services amounts
deferred from software arrangements for discounts on undelivered
elements and support renewal options granted to customers, and
amounts recorded in purchase accounting at fair value for
obligations to perform under acquired support contracts.
Deferred income will be recognized as software revenue, support
revenue, professional service revenue, or other revenue,
depending on the reasons for the deferral, once the basic
applicable revenue recognition criteria have been met, for
example, when the related services are performed or when the
discounts are used. The current portion of deferred income is
expected to be recognized within the next 12 months.
Treasury Stock
Treasury shares are recorded at acquisition cost and are
presented as a deduction from Shareholders equity. Gains
and losses on the subsequent reissuance of treasury shares are
credited or charged to Additional paid-in capital on an
after-tax basis. On cancellation of treasury shares any excess
over the calculated par value is charged to Retained earnings.
New Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which provides a
single definition of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and requires expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The provisions of SFAS 157 should be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it
is initially applied. FSP FAS
157-2 defers
the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities that are not remeasured at fair value
on a recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We have adopted Statement 157 except for those items
specifically deferred by FSP
SFAS 157-2.
Based on the analysis done so far, we do not expect the full
adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R), which
requires acquirers of a business to recognize most identifiable
assets acquired, including goodwill, the liabilities assumed,
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at their full
fair value on the acquisition date. SFAS 141R also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is
to be applied prospectively. Earlier application is prohibited.
Historically, we have rarely entered into business combinations
in which we did not fully acquire the target. Should this
history continue, the main impacts from applying SFAS 141R
will be those resulting from changes in acquired income tax
F-20
positions in accordance with FIN 48 and additional expenses
resulting from the new guidance in SFAS 141R under which
acquisition-related expenses and restructuring expenses can no
longer be recorded as part of the purchase price in a business
combination. The amount of these additional expenses mainly
depends on the number and size of our future business
combinations as well as the extent of use of third-party
resources in the acquisition process.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which establishes
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
(minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity
that should be reported as equity in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and establishes a single method of accounting for
changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary
that do not result in deconsolidation. SFAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 and is to be applied prospectively, except for presentation
and disclosure requirements which shall be applied
retrospectively. Earlier application is prohibited.
Noncontrolling interests in our consolidated financial
statements are not material. Therefore we do not expect
SFAS 160 to materially impact our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB ratified
EITF 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements
(EITF 07-1),
which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes
reporting requirements for transactions between participants in
the arrangement and third parties.
EITF 07-1
also establishes the appropriate income statement presentation
and classification for joint operating activities and payments
between participants, as well as the sufficiency of the
disclosure related to these arrangements.
EITF 07-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We do not expect the adoption of
EITF 07-1
to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of
FAS 133 (SFAS 161), which establishes the
disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and for
hedging activities. This Statement amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 with the intent to
provide users of financial statements with an enhanced
understanding of: (1) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (2) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its
related interpretations and (3) how derivative instruments
and related hedged items affect an entitys financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008 and is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is
encouraged. We do not expect SFAS 161 to materially impact
our consolidated financial statements with the exception of
additional disclosures.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(FSP 142-3),
which amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This new guidance applies
prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired
individually or with a group of other assets in business
combinations and asset acquisitions.
FSP 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. Early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the
adoption of
FSP 142-3
to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 162), which identifies the sources of
generally accepted accounting principles and provides a
framework, or hierarchy, for selecting the principles to be used
in preparing U.S. GAAP financial statements for
nongovernmental entities. This Statement makes the GAAP
hierarchy explicitly and directly applicable to preparers of
financial statements, a step that recognizes preparers
responsibilities for selecting the accounting principles for
their financial statements. The hierarchy of authoritative
accounting guidance is not expected to change current practice.
This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified
EITF 08-6,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations
(EITF 08-6),
which addresses questions about the potential effect of
SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 on equity-method
F-21
accounting under Opinion 18. The primary issues are whether
transaction costs for an investment in a new acquisition should
be expensed as incurred or included in the investments
cost basis, how to account for subsequent purchases and sales of
additional ownership interests by the investee, and whether the
investor must separately assess its share of the investees
underlying assets for impairment.
EITF 08-6
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, consistent with the effective dates of SFAS 141(R)
and SFAS 160. We do not expect the adoption of
EITF 08-6
to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified
EITF 08-7,
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets
(EITF 08-7),
which pertains to the accounting for acquired intangible assets
that the acquirer decides not to use, but intends to hold to
prevent others from using them.
EITF 08-7
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, in order to coincide with the effective
dates of SFAS 141(R). We do not expect the adoption of
EITF 08-7
to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In 2008, we acquired the outstanding shares of two unrelated
companies and the net assets of two other unrelated businesses.
The results of these acquired businesses have been included in
our Consolidated Statements of Income since the respective
acquisition dates. Acquisitions in 2008 were as follows:
All 2008 acquisitions except for the acquisition of Business
Objects S.A. were immaterial individually and in the aggregate
to SAP. All of the acquired businesses developed
and/or sold
software in specific areas with strategic interest to us. The
aggregate purchase price of our 2008 acquisitions was paid in
cash and, excluding Business Objects, amounted to
85 million net of cash received. The amount was
allocated as follows: 34 million as identifiable
intangible assets with estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to
12 years, 1 million as in-
F-22
process research and development which was expensed at the
respective acquisition date since the respective acquired
technologies had no alternative future use, and 3 million
as net liabilities. The remaining 53 million was
allocated to goodwill, of which 6 million is expected
to be fully deductible for tax purposes over an amortization
period of up to 15 years. In addition we recorded a
2 million settlement loss related to a reacquired
distribution right in connection with one of the acquisitions.
We have not yet finalized the purchase price allocation for the
transactions concluded during the second half of 2008, as we are
still in the process of evaluating our assumptions for these
acquisitions and particularly the assumed pre-acquisition
contingencies related to tax and customer contracts.
Acquisition of
Business Objects S.A.
Business Objects is a provider of business intelligence
solutions. Through a combination of technology, consulting,
education services, and its partner network, Business Objects
provides information and business decision making resources to
small and large companies. Business Objects has dual
headquarters in San Jose, California and Levallois-Perret,
France. Before the acquisition, its stock was traded on both the
NASDAQ (via American depositary receipts) and Euronext Paris
stock exchanges. We acquired substantially all of the
outstanding shares of Business Objects during the first two
months of 2008, except a very minor amount of shares (0.02% of
share capital) held by employees that are restricted under local
law. Our acquisition took the form of a tender offer under
French and U.S. law for all Business Objects common
stock, all American depositary shares representing Business
Objects common stock, and all convertible bonds and warrants
issued by Business Objects.
Under the terms and conditions of the tender offer agreement, we
made a cash offer of 42.00 per share of common stock and
the U.S. dollar equivalent of 42.00 per American
depositary receipts share determined using the Euro to
U.S. dollar exchange rate on settlement of the tender
offers and of 50.65 per convertible bond, and a range of
12.01 to 24.96 per warrant, depending on the warrant
grant date. After reaching the initial minimum tender condition
of more than 50% as at January 21, 2008 the tender offer
period was reopened under the same conditions until
January 29, thereby resulting in an ownership level of more
than 95%. This allowed SAP to commence an immediate
squeeze-out acquisition of the outstanding shares of
the remaining shareholders. The acquisition cost in the amount
of 4.2 billion net of cash acquired has been financed
partially by a syndicated bank loan.
The following table shows the components of our acquisition cost
for Business Objects:
Business Objects
Acquisition Cost
As part of the business combination, we purchased substantially
all shares outstanding, all warrants, and all convertible bonds.
The convertible bonds have been converted and the face value of
the bond (450 million)
F-23
has been paid to SAP since the acquisition. In addition, we
assumed Business Objects employee share-based payment
programs without changing the parameters of these programs. The
fair value of employee stock options assumed and awards
exchanged was determined using a binomial based valuation model
with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of
3.42%-3.74%, expected volatility of 29%, and a dividend yield of
1.3%. For the purposes of purchase accounting we have used the
cash offer price of 42 for the valuation of the fair value
of the exchanged Business Objects stock option awards. The fair
value of unvested Business Objects options and restricted stock
awards related to future service is being amortized on the basis
of the accelerated attribution method over the remaining service
period, while the value of vested options is included in the
total purchase price. Acquisition related transaction costs
include investment banking fees, legal and other fees for
external advisors directly related to the acquisition.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair
values as of the acquisition date, January 21, 2008. The
excess of the acquisition cost of the business combination over
the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets
acquired has been recognized as goodwill. Factors that
contributed to the recognition of goodwill of
3.5 billion are expected synergies from combining the
activities of SAP and Business Objects as well as assets which
cannot be recognized separately apart from goodwill because they
are not identifiable (such as the quality and level of education
of the workforce).
The following table shows all the allocation of the acquisition
costs to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the acquisition date:
BOBJ Condensed
Opening Balance sheet
In connection with the acquisition, we have incurred
restructuring costs resulting from severance and workforce
relocation payments (18 million), elimination of
duplicate facilities (37 million), and settlements
F-24
with vendors to end service contracts (3 million).
Such costs have been recognized as liabilities of the acquired
entity.
The allocation of the purchase price is based upon valuations
and estimates as of the acquisition date.
The following pro forma financial information presents
SAPs results as if the acquisition had occurred at the
beginning of the respective periods. These pro forma results
have been prepared for comparative purposes only. The pro forma
results are not necessarily indicative either of the results of
operations that actually would have occurred had the acquisition
been in effect at the beginning of the respective periods or of
future results.
BOBJ ProForma
In connection with our 2008 transactions discussed above, we
assigned the following amounts to identifiable intangible assets:
Identifiable
Intangible Assets Acquired as part of business combinations in
2008
F-25
Goodwill adjustments in 2008 including the amounts recognized
for our 2008 acquisitions, 3 million recognized for
earn-out payments related to prior acquisitions, and
-35 million of adjustments to prior year purchase
price allocations were assigned to our Product, Consulting, and
Training segments as follows:
Assignment of
acquired goodwill to segments
F-26
Prior year
acquisitions
In 2007, we acquired the outstanding shares of five unrelated
companies and the net assets of two other unrelated businesses.
The results of these acquired businesses have been included in
our Consolidated Statements of Income since the respective
acquisition dates. Acquisitions in 2007 were as follows:
Prior
year acquisitions
These transactions were immaterial individually to SAP. The
acquired businesses developed
and/or sold
software in specific areas with strategic interest to us. Due to
the fact that we integrate our acquired businesses into our
overall operations very quickly and that some acquisitions were
concluded in the form of asset deals, we cannot determine the
additional revenues and net operating profit attributable to
these entities since the acquisition date or for the full year.
The aggregate purchase price of these 2007 acquisitions was paid
in cash and amounted to 671 million net of cash
received and was allocated as follows: 172 million as
identifiable intangible assets with estimated useful lives
ranging from one to 12 years, 1 million as
in-process research and development which was expensed at the
respective acquisition date since the respective acquired
technologies had no alternative future use, and
18 million net assets acquired. The remaining
480 million was allocated as goodwill, of which
205 million is expected to be fully deductible for
tax purposes over an amortization period of up to 15 years.
In addition, in 2007
F-27
we paid amounts related to achieved milestones and earn-out
consideration relating to prior acquisitions and escrow returns
with a net amount of 1 million, resulting in total
net cash outflow of 672 million in 2007.
In 2007, we also acquired the remaining outstanding shares of
our subsidiary SAP Systems Integration AG (SAP SI).
We accounted for the acquisition of SAP SI shares using the
purchase method. The aggregate purchase price for the SAP SI
shares acquired in 2007 was 48 million, which was
paid in cash. The purchase price was based on SAPs cash
offer of 38.83 per share which was made under the
squeeze-out provisions of the German Stock
Corporation Act, section 327a, paragraph 1. Those
provisions entitled us, as the holder of at least 95% of the
outstanding shares, to acquire for cash all remaining shares
owned by the non-controlling shareholders. We allocated
9 million to minority interest, 2 million
to identifiable intangible assets and 37 million of
the aggregate purchase price to goodwill in the Consulting
segment. The recorded goodwill is not tax deductible.
With the purchase of software licenses and support business or
our exclusive partner SAP Arabia we also reacquired some
contracts and rights, including our trademark and the existing
exclusive distribution arrangement. The amount allocated to the
reacquired software distribution right was 37 million
(which is included in the above amount of acquired intangibles).
The settlement of pre-existing rights and contracts resulted in
a settlement loss of 3 million and was recognized in
Cost of sales and marketing.
In connection with the 2007 transactions including the
squeeze-out of SAP SI, we assigned the following amounts to
identifiable intangible assets:
Identifiable
intangible assets acquired as part of business
combinations
(5) REVENUE
Revenue information by segment and geographic region is
disclosed in Note 28.
Revenues from construction-type contracts (contract revenues)
are included in software revenue and professional service
revenue resulting from essential consulting services depending
on the type of project.
Detailed information on our revenue recognition policies is
disclosed in Note 3.
(6) FUNCTIONAL
COSTS AND OTHER EXPENSES
The information provided below is classified by the type of
expense. The Consolidated Statements of Income include these
amounts in various categories based on the applicable functional
area.
F-28
Personnel
Expenses/Number of Employees
Personnel expenses were as follows:
Personnel
Expenses
Expenses associated with our share-based compensation plans
described in Note 27 are included in personnel expenses for
all years presented.
The average number of employees, measured in full-time
equivalents, was as follows:
Number of
Employees
Government Grants
During the fiscal year 2008 we received 32 million
(2007: 16 million, 2006: 11 million) of
government grants and similar assistance which we have offset
against our related expenses. All conditions required to obtain
these grants have either been met or are reasonably assured of
being met.
In addition we have received conditional promises of a further
44 million, which relate mostly to research- and
development related expenses, which have not been recorded as at
December 31, 2008 because the conditions required to obtain
them are not yet reasonably assured of being achieved.
Advertising expenses
Advertising expenses amounted to 151 million,
165 million, and 172 million in 2008,
2007, and 2006 respectively.
F-29
(7) OTHER
OPERATING INCOME/EXPENSE, NET
Other operating income/expense for the years ending December 31
was as follows:
Other
Operating Income/Expense, Net
(8) OTHER
NON-OPERATING INCOME/EXPENSE, NET
Other non-operating income/expense, net for the years ending
December 31 was as follows:
Other
Non-operating Income/Expense, Net
F-30
(9) FINANCIAL
INCOME/EXPENSE, NET
Financial income, net for the years ending December 31 was as
follows:
Financial
Income/expense, Net
We derive interest income primarily from cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, and other financial assets.
The increase in interest expense is mainly due to the credit
facility we entered into in connection with the acquisition of
Business Objects S.A.
In the table above, income from securities and expenses for
other financial assets and loans both include
0 million in 2008 (241 million in 2007;
156 million in 2006) resulting from collateral
held to secure financing investments made. While holding the
collateral, we directly transfer to the debtor any income
received on the collateral. Interest income received on the
financing investment is included in interest income. We decide
on a
case-by-case
basis whether to require collateral for our financial
investments.
Information on gains and losses recognized directly in
Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss or in profit and
loss for our financial assets is given in Note 13 and for
our financial liabilities in Note 18. For information about
our hedging activities, see Note 25.
F-31
(10) INCOME
TAXES
Income tax expense for the years ending December 31 comprised
the following components:
Income
Tax Expense
In 2008, 2007, and 2006, the German government enacted several
new tax laws. Included was the 2008 Business Tax Reform which
was enacted in 2007 and has major effects on corporations. For
us the most significant effect results from a reduction of the
German corporate income tax rate from 25% to 15%, effective
January 1, 2008. For deferred tax purposes, this reduction
of the corporate income tax rate in Germany was already taken
into account in 2007, as deferred taxes are required to be
calculated using the enacted tax rate applicable to the year in
which the deferred tax item is expected to be realized or
settled. The resulting effect on deferred taxes did not
materially impact earnings.
The impact of the remaining tax law changes enacted in 2007, and
the new tax laws enacted in 2008 and 2006, was not material to
our consolidated financial statements for the years ending
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
Income from continuing operations before income tax and minority
interests consisted of the following:
Income
from Continuing Operations
F-32
The effective income tax rate for the years ending
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, was 30.0%, 32.2%, and
29.9%, respectively. The following table reconciles the expected
income tax expense computed by applying our combined German
corporate tax rate of 26.33% (2007: 35.49%; 2006: 35.66%) to the
actual income tax expense. Our 2008 combined German corporate
tax rate includes a corporate income tax rate of 15.00%, (2007:
21.91%; 2006: 21.85%; 2007 and 2006 after the benefit of trade
tax deductibility which ceased in 2008), plus a solidarity
surcharge of 5.5% thereon, and trade taxes of 10.50% (2007:
12.38%; 2006: 12.61%).
Reconciliation
of Income Tax Expense
F-33
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 relate to the underlying items
as follows:
Deferred
Tax Assets and Liabilities
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we
consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Based on the
level of historical taxable income and projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets
are recoverable, we believe it is more likely than not that the
Company will realize the benefits of these deductible
differences, net of the existing valuation allowances as at
December 31, 2008. The amount of the deferred tax asset
considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near
term if our estimates of future taxable income during the
carryforward period were reduced.
At December 31, 2008, certain of our foreign subsidiaries
with continuing operations had net operating loss carryforwards
amounting to 318 million (2007:
114 million), which may be used to offset future
taxable income. Of this amount, 160 million relates
to federal net operating loss carryforwards in the United
States, of which 84 million expire during the years
2024 through 2028 if not used earlier, and
123 million relates to state net operating loss
carryforwards in the United States, of which
70 million expire during the years 2024 through 2028
if not used earlier. The remaining amounts of the U.S. loss
carryforwards are available to be used to offset federal and
state taxable income, if any, over the next 15 years. Of
the 35 million net operating loss carryforwards
outside of the United States, 15 million relates to
net operating loss carryforwards that will
F-34
expire if not used within one to seven years and
20 million relates to net operating loss
carryforwards that will not expire and therefore can be utilized
indefinitely.
Deferred tax assets as at December 31, 2008, and 2007 have
been reduced by a valuation allowance of 33 million
and 8 million respectively to a net amount that we
believe is more likely than not to be realized.
We recognized deferred income tax liabilities of
14 million (2007: 17 million) for income
taxes on future dividend distributions from foreign
subsidiaries, which is based on 696 million (2007:
1,335 million) cumulative undistributed earnings of
those foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to
be repatriated. We have not recognized a deferred income tax
liability on approximately 2,764 million (2007:
2,249 million) for undistributed earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries that arose in 2008 and prior years because
we plan to indefinitely reinvest those undistributed earnings.
It is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized tax
liabilities for these undistributed foreign earnings.
Total income taxes including the items charged or credited
directly to related components of shareholders equity for
the years ending December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 consist
of the following:
Total
Income Taxes
For information about the income tax impact of the components of
Accumulated other comprehensive Income/loss, see Note 20.
At January 1, 2008, unrecognized income tax benefits
relating to uncertain tax positions amounted to 96 million
and were accounted for as income tax provisions. At
December 31, 2008, uncertainties in income taxes had
increased by 155 million to 251 million
(thereof 241 million (2007: 96 million)
would have an impact on the effective tax rate if recognized).
F-35
The amounts of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
The unrecognized income tax benefits at December 31, 2008
include 156 million related to Business Objects,
which is net of 87 million related to 2008
settlements of Business Objects related tax contingencies.
As at December 31, 2008 interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits shown in the statement of income
amounted to 7 million (2007: 2 million).
The respective provision for interest and penalties amounted to
37 million (2007: 4 million). This
provision, that includes an increase in the amount of
32 million due to the acquisition of Business
Objects, is shown as income tax obligation.
For the major tax jurisdictions and legal entities in Germany,
fiscal years 2003 through 2008 and for the United States, fiscal
years 2005 through 2008 remain subject to examination. It is
reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits may increase or decrease within the next
12 months. However we do not anticipate that unrecognized
income tax benefits will significantly change within
12 months of the reporting date.
(11) ASSETS AND
LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In November 2007 we committed to a plan to sell the business of
TomorrowNow, Inc., (TomorrowNow), a wholly owned subsidiary of
SAP America, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of SAP AG) and to
cease engaging in the business model of providing support
services relating to third-party software. Negotiations with
several interested parties took place. The assets and
liabilities of TomorrowNow, which included the assets and
liabilities of TomorrowNow entities in Europe, Australia and
Asia were expected to be sold within twelve months. Therefore,
the assets and liabilities were classified as a disposal group
held for sale and were presented separately in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2007.
In the second half of 2008 we made a strategic decision to
discontinue our search for potential buyers and to rather
abandon the operations of TomorrowNow. We completed the
abandonment of TomorrowNow in October 2008. As part of this
process, the assets were either disposed of or fully depreciated
since there is no continuing economic benefit. All operating
liabilities were settled and any remaining liabilities not
relating to the operations of TomorrowNow were assumed by the
Group.
TomorrowNow was a distinct asset group with cash flows and
operations that were separable from those of the rest of SAP.
The operations of this disposal group had been accounted for as
a part of the product segment. U.S. GAAP requires the
results of operations of a component of an entity that either
has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale to be
removed from income from continuing operations and reported as
discontinued
F-36
operations for all periods presented. The following table
details the amounts reclassified to discontinued operations:
Results
from Discontinued Operations
The following table details the major classes of assets and
liabilities of the TomorrowNow disposal group held for sale at
December 31, 2007:
Assets
and Liabilities Held for Sale
(12) EARNINGS
PER SHARE
Convertible bonds and stock options granted to employees under
our share-based compensation programs are included in the
diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they have
a dilutive effect. The dilutive impact is calculated using the
treasury stock method. The computation of diluted earnings per
share does not include certain convertible bonds and stock
options issued in connection with the SAP AG 2000 Long Term
Incentive Plan (LTI 2000 Plan) and the SAP Stock
Option Plan 2002 (SAP SOP 2002) because their
effect is antidilutive. Such convertible bonds and stock
options, if converted or exercised, represented
43.6 million SAP common shares in 2008, 37.3 million
SAP common shares in 2007 and 23.6 million SAP common
shares in 2006. The number of outstanding stock options and
convertible bonds is presented in Note 27.
F-37
Earnings
per Share
|
|
(13)
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
|
Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash and Investments as at
December 31 consisted of the following:
Cash and
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Financial Assets
F-38
Restricted Cash
Funds classified as Restricted cash as at December 31, 2007
related to a security deposit that served as collateral for
SAPs credit facility entered into in connection with the
acquisition of Business Objects S.A. as described in Note 4
and 18.
Debt Securities and
Marketable Equity Securities
As at December 31, 2008 and 2007, all of our debt and
marketable equity securities held as investments were classified
as available-for-sale. Fund securities mainly comprise of
investments in federal bonds from EU countries. Proceeds from
sales of available-for-sale securities in 2008
were 478 million
(2007: 45 million;
2006: 199 million). Gross gains realized from
sales of available-for-sale securities in 2008
were 5 million (2007: 2 million;
2006: 0 million). Gross losses realized from
sales of available-for-sale securities in 2008
were 2 million (2007: 1 million;
2006: 2 million). Due to these sales of
available-for-sale securities we recognized in profit and loss
gains of 5 million
(2007: 2 million;
2006: 0 million) and losses
of 2 million (2007: 1 million;
2006: 2 million) which had previously been
included in Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss.
Amounts pertaining to marketable securities as at December 31
were as follows:
Securities
For the marketable securities in a loss position, the fair
values are categorized according to the duration of the loss
position as follows:
Marketable
Securities in Loss Position
F-39
For the year ending December 31, 2008, we recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges related to marketable
equity securities of 1 million
(2007: 1 million;
2006: 0 million) and therefore removed
unrealized losses recorded directly in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss up to that point of 1 million
(2007: 1 million;
2006: 0 million).
The marketable debt securities as at December 31, 2008,
consisted of investment grade bonds. The decline in fair value
of marketable debt securities in 2008 resulted from changes in
general market conditions and not from changes in the
creditworthiness of the underlying debtor. We determine these
impairments to be temporary, in view of the short duration of
the respective declines in value and our intention and ability
to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time
sufficient for a forecasted recovery.
The estimated year-end fair values of our debt securities
(excluding debt-based funds), are presented by contractual
maturity below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without penalty.
Debt
Securities
Equity Securities at
Cost
The carrying value of all equity securities at cost
was 74 million and 69 million as
at December 31, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Equity
securities at cost, which primarily include venture capital
investments, are not included in the table above as market
values for those securities are generally not readily
observable. In 2008, we sold two (2007: two; 2006: two)
investments with a carrying value at the time of sale
of 3 million (2007: 3 million;
2006: 2 million) and realized gains
of 10 million (2007: 0 million;
2006: 0 million). As at December 31, 2008
we intend to dispose of one cost method investment in the near
future. For information on fair value measurement with regard to
our equity securities at cost, please see Note 26.
During 2008, 2007, and 2006, we
recorded 12 million, 6 million,
and 1 million, respectively, in charges related
to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities at cost.
Equity Method
Investments
We account for the following companies under the equity method:
The excess of our initial investment in equity method companies
over our ownership percentage in the underlying net assets of
those companies amounted to 12 million as at
December 31, 2008 (2007: 11 million) and is
attributed to certain fair-value adjustments with the remaining
portion recognized as goodwill. Although we own less than 20% of
the voting stock of the investee company, we account for three
investments using the equity method, because we can exercise
significant influence over the operating and financial policies
of these entities through holding seats on their boards or other
means.
F-40
|
|
(14)
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE,
NET
|
Accounts receivable, net includes costs and estimated earnings
in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
of 221 million and 162 million
as at December 31, 2008, and 2007, respectively. We
received advances of 470 million
and 385 million as at December 31, 2008,
and 2007, respectively.
The carrying amounts of our accounts receivable from customers
as at December 31 were as follows:
Carrying
Amounts of Accounts Receivable
Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows:
Changes
in the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Concentrations of credit risks are limited due to our large
customer base and its dispersion across many different
industries and countries worldwide. No single customer accounted
for 5% or more of total revenues in 2008, 2007, or 2006 or of
Accounts receivable, net in 2008 or 2007. The aging of Accounts
receivable as at December 31 was:
Aging of
Accounts Receivable Gross
At the outset of any customer arrangement we strictly assess the
creditworthiness of the respective customer and only record
revenue and the related receivable if collectibility is assured.
Due to this approach and our short payment terms, we have no
indication as at the reporting date of impairments of Accounts
receivable that are not past due.
For accounts receivable past due, we determine the allowance for
doubtful accounts using a two-step-approach described in
Note 3. We therefore consider accounts receivable
of 86 million (2007: 33 million)
as
F-41
individually impaired in full or only partially mainly based on
debtors financial difficulties and accounts receivable
of 769 million
(2007: 587 million) as collectively impaired
based on the age of the receivables and our historical loss
experience.
For more information about financial risk and how we manage it,
see Note 26.
Other
Assets
Investments in insurance policies relate to the
employee-financed pension plans as presented in Note 19a.
The corresponding liability for investments in other
postemployment plans is included in employee-related obligations
(see Note 19b).
Detailed information about our derivative financial instruments
is presented in Note 25.
Loans granted to employees primarily consist of interest-free or
below-market-rate building loans. Gross amounts of loans to
employees were 64 million in 2008
and 63 million in 2007. The cumulative effect of
discounting the employee loans based on the market interest
rates in effect when the loans were granted
was 11 million in 2008
and 11 million in 2007. Amortization of employee
loan discounts amounted to 3 million in 2008
and 3 million in 2007, respectively. There have
been no loans to employees or members of the Executive Board and
Supervisory Board to assist them in exercising stock options or
convertible bonds. There have been no significant defaults of
loans to employees.
Miscellaneous other assets primarily consists of interest
receivables, tax claims, short-term loans, and other items for
which the recognized amounts are not material.
Loans to third parties are presented net of allowances for
credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses of
third-party loans were not significant in all periods presented.
F-42
|
|
(16)
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
F-43
The additions to goodwill result from our acquisitions
(3.579 million), contingent consideration paid for
prior acquisitions (3 million), and purchase price
adjustments (-35 million). For more information about
our acquisitions, see Note 4. Due to our decision in the
second half of 2008 to abandon our TomorrowNow operations, we
recorded a loss on disposal for the goodwill in the amount
of 6 million allocated to this disposal group.
For more information on our discontinued operations, see
Note 11.
All our intangible assets except goodwill are subject to
amortization. Intangible assets consist of three major asset
classes: Software and database licenses, Acquired technology,
and Other intangibles.
Software and database licenses consist primarily of technology
for internal use whereas Acquired technology consists primarily
of purchased software to be incorporated into our product
offerings. The additions to Software and database licenses in
2008 and 2007 were individually acquired from third parties,
whereas the additions to Acquired technology and Other
intangibles primarily result from our acquisitions discussed in
Note 4.
Other intangibles consist primarily of acquired trademark
licenses and customer contracts acquired as well as In-process
research and development which is fully amortized upon
acquisition. For more information, see Note 4.
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for our intangible
assets recorded as at December 31, 2008, for each of the
five succeeding years ending December 31, is as follows:
Estimated
Future Amortization of Intangibles
The carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment as at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
Goodwill
by Segments
For more information about our segments, see Note 28.
F-44
|
|
(17)
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND
EQUIPMENT
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
F-45
The additions and disposals in Other property, plant, and
equipment relate primarily to the renewal and purchase of
computer hardware and cars acquired in the normal course of
business.
Interest capitalized was not material in any period presented.
During 2008, 2007, and 2006, depreciation expense for Property,
plant, and equipment
was 214 million, 179 million,
and 156 million, respectively. The majority of
depreciation expense for all years presented related to assets
classified as Other property, plant, and equipment.
|
|
(18)
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE,
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES AND OTHER LIABILITIES
|
Accounts payable, Financial liabilities and Other liabilities
classified on due dates as at December 31 were as follows:
Accounts
Payable, Financial Liabilities and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
less than
|
|
between 1
|
|
more than
|
|
Balance on
|
|
less than 1
|
|
between 1
|
|
more than
|
|
Balance on
|
millions
|
|
1 year
|
|
and 5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
31.12.2008
|
|
year
|
|
and 5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
31.12.2007
|
|
Payable to suppliers
|
|
506
|
|
3
|
|
0
|
|
509
|
|
688
|
|
6
|
|
0
|
|
694
|
Advance payments received
|
|
32
|
|
2
|
|
0
|
|
34
|
|
27
|
|
4
|
|
0
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
538
|
|
5
|
|
0
|
|
543
|
|
715
|
|
10
|
|
0
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans and overdraft
|
|
2,319
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
2,321
|
|
25
|
|
2
|
|
0
|
|
27
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
255
|
|
33
|
|
0
|
|
288
|
|
57
|
|
4
|
|
0
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
2,574
|
|
34
|
|
1
|
|
2,609
|
|
82
|
|
6
|
|
0
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other employee-related liabilities
|
|
1,161
|
|
6
|
|
51
|
|
1,218
|
|
1,060
|
|
6
|
|
49
|
|
1,115
|
Other taxes
|
|
268
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
268
|
|
262
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
262
|
Miscellaneous other liabilities
|
|
57
|
|
23
|
|
15
|
|
95
|
|
52
|
|
11
|
|
7
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
1,486
|
|
29
|
|
66
|
|
1,581
|
|
1,374
|
|
17
|
|
56
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
68
|
|
67
|
|
4,733
|
|
2,171
|
|
33
|
|
56
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities are unsecured, except for the retention of title and
similar rights which are customary in our industry. Effective
interest rates on bank loans were 4.30% in 2008, 8.03% in 2007,
and 8.08% in 2006.
As at October 1, 2007, SAP AG entered into
a 5 billion credit facility agreement with
Deutsche Bank AG. The credit facility was entered into in
connection with our acquisition of Business Objects S.A. The use
of the facility is not restricted by any financial covenants. As
at December 31, 2008, there were borrowings
of 2.3 billion outstanding under the facility
which bear interest of EURIBOR plus a margin of 0.25%. The
credit facility matures at December 31, 2009. It can be
repaid in full or in part at any time at our request, but at the
latest at December 31, 2009.
As at November 5, 2004, SAP AG entered into
a 1 billion syndicated revolving credit facility
agreement with an initial term of five years. The use of the
facility is not restricted by any financial covenants.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest of EURIBOR or LIBOR
for the respective currency plus a margin ranging from 0.20% to
0.25% depending on the amount drawn. We are also required to pay
a commitment fee of 0.07% per annum on the unused available
credit. As at December 31, 2008, and 2007, there were no
borrowings outstanding under the facility.
Additionally, as at December 31, 2008, and 2007, SAP AG had
available lines of credit totaling 597 million
and 599 million, respectively. As at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no borrowings
outstanding under these lines of credit.
As at December 31, 2008 and 2007, certain subsidiaries had
lines of credit available that allowed them to borrow in local
currencies at prevailing interest rates up
to 52 million and 44 million,
respectively. Total
F-46
aggregate borrowings under these lines of credit, which are
guaranteed by SAP AG, amounted to 21 million as at
December 31, 2008, and 27 million as at
December 31, 2007.
A maturity analysis that provides the remaining contractual
undiscounted cash flows of all our financial liabilities held at
December 31, 2008 and those contractually agreed is shown
in the table below. Financial liabilities for which repayment
can be requested by the contract partner at any time are
assigned to the earliest possible period. Variable interest
payments were calculated using the last interest rate fixed
before December 31, 2008. As we settle our derivative
contracts gross, we separately show the pay and receive leg for
all our currency and interest rate derivatives whether or not
the fair value of the derivative is negative. The cash outflows
for the currency derivatives are translated using the respective
forward rate.
Contractual
maturities of financial liabilities
F-47
Provisions based on due dates as at December 31 were as follows:
Provisions
|
|
a)
|
Pension Plans and
Similar Obligations
|
We maintain several defined benefit and defined contribution
plans for our employees in Germany and at our foreign
subsidiaries, which provide for old age, disability, and
survivors benefits. We also have several immaterial
foreign termination indemnity plans that meet the criteria of
defined benefit plans included in foreign benefit plans. The
measurement dates for the domestic and foreign benefit plans are
December 31. Individual benefit plans have also been
established for members of the Executive Board.
The liabilities accrued for pensions and other similar
obligations on December 31 consist of the following:
Liabilities
Accrued for Pensions and Other Similar Obligations
The increase in total liabilities accrued for pension plans
mainly result from an increase in employee-financed plans. The
related insurance contracts held by us resulted in an increase
in Other assets by the same amount. For more information about
our employee-financed pension plans, see the further information
below.
The Consolidated Balance Sheets include the following
significant components related to defined benefit pension plans
as at December 31, 2008, and 2007:
F-48
Significant
Components related to Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans and Similar Obligations
Our domestic defined benefit plans provide participants with
pension benefits that are based on the length of service and
compensation of employees. Foreign defined benefit plans provide
participants with pension benefits that are based on
compensation levels, age, and length of service.
Certain of our foreign subsidiaries are required to provide to
their employees termination indemnity benefits regardless of the
reason for termination. We treat these plans as defined benefit
plans if the substance of the post-employment plan is a pension
type-arrangement. Most of these arrangements provide the
employee with a one-time payment based on compensation levels,
age, and years of service on termination, regardless of the
reason (retirement, voluntary or involuntary).
Our subsidiaries in the United States decided to
freeze their defined benefit plan effective
December 31, 2008 and offer additional and improved
benefits under their defined contribution plan
(401k-Plan
regulations) instead. Beginning in 2009, eligible employees
cannot continue to increase future retirement benefits through
continued service to the company except for earning interest on
their plan asset balance. We treat this defined benefit
amendment as a curtailment in accordance with SFAS 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of
Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits (
SFAS 88), due to the fact that future service
of current employees will no longer qualify for benefits. As a
result we reduced net loss included in other comprehensive
income/loss in the amount of 9 million as offset
to the reduction of the defined benefit obligation.
The following table presents the change in the present value of
the defined benefit obligations and the fair value of the plan
assets with a reconciliation of the funded status to net amounts
recognized:
F-49
Change in
the Present Value of the DBO and the Fair Value of the Plan
Assets
The following weighted average assumptions were used for the
actuarial valuation of our domestic and foreign pension
liabilities as at the respective measurement date:
Actuarial
Assumptions for Defined Benefit Liabilities
The components of our net periodic benefit cost and other
amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the years
ending December 31 were as follows:
F-50
Cost of
Defined Benefit Plans
Amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic
pension cost that are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income:
Unrecognized
Pension Cost
We will amortize in 2009 actuarial gains and losses of our
defined benefit plans from accumulated other comprehensive
income into net periodic benefit cost in the amount
of 6 million.
F-51
Our actuaries relied on the following principal actuarial
assumptions (expressed as weighted averages for our foreign and
other post-employment benefit plans) for 2008, 2007, and 2006 to
calculate the net periodic benefit costs:
Actuarial
Assumptions for Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Pension Assets
Our investment strategy on domestic benefit plans is to invest
all contributions in stable insurance policies. The expected
rate of return on plan assets for our domestic benefit plans is
calculated by reference to the expected returns achievable on
the insured policies given the expected asset mix of the
policies. The assumed discount rates are derived from rates
available on high-quality fixed-income investments for which the
timing and amounts of payments match the timing and the amounts
of our projected pension payments.
The expected return assumptions for our foreign plan assets are
based on weighted average expected long-term rates of return for
each asset class which are estimated based on factors such as
historical return patterns for each asset class and forecasts
for inflation. We review historical return patterns and other
relevant financial factors for appropriateness and
reasonableness and make modifications to eliminate certain
effects when considered necessary. The assumed discount rates
are derived from rates available on investment grade
fixed-income investments for which the timing and amounts of
payments match the timing and amounts of our projected pension
payments. Our foreign benefit plan asset allocation as at
December 31, 2008, and our target asset allocation, is as
follows:
Plan
Asset Allocation for Foreign Pension Plans
and Other Post-Employment Obligations
F-52
The investment strategies for foreign benefit plans vary
according to the conditions of the country in which the benefit
plans are maintained. Generally, a long-term investment horizon
has been adopted for all major foreign benefit plans. Our policy
is to invest in a risk-diversified portfolio consisting of a mix
of assets within the target asset allocation range presented
above.
Funded Status of
Domestic and Foreign Plans
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit
obligation, and fair value of plan assets for our domestic and
foreign defined benefit pension plans as well as post employment
benefit plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of
plan assets are as follows:
Funded
Status of Plans with Accumulated Benefit
Obligation in excess of Plan Assets
F-53
Expected Future
Contributions and Benefits
Our expected contribution in 2009 is 2 million
for domestic defined benefit plans
and 29 million for foreign defined benefit and
post-employment benefit plans, all of which is expected to be
paid as cash contributions.
The estimated future pension benefit payments to be made over
the next 10 years by our domestic and foreign benefit plans
for the years ending December 31 are as follows:
Estimated
Future Pension Benefit Payments
Defined Contribution
Pension Plans
We maintain domestic and foreign defined contribution plans.
Amounts contributed by the Company under such plans are based on
a percentage of the employees salary or the amount of
contributions made by employees. The costs associated with
defined contribution plans
were 86 million, 93 million,
and 92 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006
respectively.
Employee-Financed
Pension Plan
In Germany we maintain an unqualified employee-financed pension
plan, whereby employees may contribute a limited portion of
their salary. We purchase and hold guaranteed fixed rate
insurance contracts, which are recorded in Other assets (see
Note 15) and are equal to the obligations under the
plan (282 million and 236 million on
December 31, 2008, and 2007, respectively).
F-54
(19) PROVISIONS
b) Other
Obligations
Other obligations as at December 31 were as follows:
Other
Obligations
Obligations related to share-based compensation programs
comprise the obligations for our cash-settled share-based
compensation programs which are described in detail in
Note 27.
Other employee-related obligations primarily comprise provisions
for time credits, severance payments under ongoing
post-employment benefit plans in accordance with SFAS 112,
Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
(SFAS 112), jubilee expenses, and
semiretirement.
Restructuring activities include contract termination costs and
similar restructuring costs for unused lease space. We account
for our restructuring activities in accordance with
SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit and
Disposal Activities (SAFS 146). Our provision for
unused lease space relates to costs that we will continue to
incur for vacated space under various operating lease contracts
that will have no future economic benefit. Restructuring costs
are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income in the
line item Other operating income/expense, net.
In connection with the acquisition of Business Objects S.A., we
incurred costs related to certain exit activities of Business
Objects and to involuntarily terminate or relocate employees of
Business Objects. As such, and as described in detail in
Note 4, we accrued restructuring costs in accordance with
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with the Purchase
Business Combination
(EITF 95-3)
as part of the allocation of the purchase price for Business
Objects.
The following table provides a roll forward of our restructuring
obligations including amounts charged or credited to the
Consolidated Statements of Income for each year presented:
F-55
Restructuring
obligations
Warranty obligations represent the estimated future cost of
fulfilling our contractual requirements associated with sales of
our software. We determine the warranty accrual based on the
historical average cost of fulfilling our obligations under
these commitments. Changes in the warranty accruals in 2008 and
2007 are summarized below:
Changes
in warranty accruals
F-56
Other obligations relate mainly to asset retirement obligations
and the litigation matters described in Note 24. For asset
retirement obligations we record the present value of these
obligations in the period in which the obligation is incurred.
The increase during the period of the discounted amount was not
material.
Additions to our provisions also include interest components
which are not material individually and in the aggregate.
|
|
(20)
|
SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Common Stock
As at December 31, 2008, the capital stock of SAP AG
consisted of 1,225,762,900 (2007: 1,246,258,408) shares of
no-par common stock (including treasury stock), with a
calculated nominal value of 1 per share.
In 2008 the number of common shares decreased by
21,000,000 shares (corresponding to 21,000,000) due to
cancellation of shares in treasury stock, partially offset by an
increase of 504.492 shares (corresponding
to 504,492) as a result of the exercise of awards
granted under certain share-based payment plans. In 2007 the
number of common shares decreased by 23,000,000 shares
(corresponding to 23,000,000) due to cancellation of
shares in treasury stock, partially offset by an increase of
1,721,160 shares (corresponding to 1,721,160) as
a result of the exercise of awards granted under certain
share-based payment plans.
Shareholdings in SAP AG as at December 31, 2008, were as
follows:
Shareholdings
in SAP AG (> 5% directly or indirectly)
Authorized Capital
The Articles of Incorporation authorize the Executive Board of
SAP AG (the Executive Board) to increase the Common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 60 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash until May 11, 2010 (Authorized Capital I).
The issuance is subject to the statutory subscription rights of
existing shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 180 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash until May 8, 2011 (Authorized Capital Ia).
The issuance is subject to the statutory subscription rights of
existing shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 60 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash or in kind until May 11, 2010 (Authorized
Capital II). This capital increase could also be executed
as a result of a business combination. Subject to certain
preconditions and the consent
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
of the Supervisory Board, the Executive Board is authorized to
exclude the shareholders statutory subscription rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to a total amount of 180 million through the
issuance of new common shares in return for contributions in
cash or in kind until May 8, 2011 (Authorized Capital
IIa). This capital increase could also be executed as a
result of a business combination. Subject to certain
preconditions and the consent of the Supervisory Board, the
Executive Board is authorized to exclude the shareholders
statutory subscription rights.
|
Contingent Capital
SAP AGs common stock is subject to a contingent increase
of common shares. The contingent increase may be affected only
to the extent that the holders of the convertible bonds and
stock options that were issued by SAP AG under certain
share-based payment plans (see Note 27) exercise their
conversion or subscription rights. Contingent Capital amounted
to 208 Mio. as of December 31, 2008 compared
to 209 Mio. as of December 31, 2007. The
immaterial change relates solely to the exercise of subscription
rights.
Treasury Stock
By resolution of SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders held on June 3, 2008, the Executive Board of
SAP AG was authorized to acquire, on or before November 30,
2009, up to 120 million shares in the Company on the
condition that such share purchases, together with any
previously acquired shares, do not account for more than 10% of
SAP AGs Common stock. Although Treasury stock is legally
considered outstanding, there are no dividend or voting rights
associated with shares held in treasury. We may redeem or resell
shares held in treasury or may use Treasury stock for the
purpose of servicing subscription rights and conversion rights
under the Companys share-based payment plans. Also, we may
use the shares held in treasury as consideration in connection
with the acquisition of other companies.
As at December 31, 2008, we had acquired 38 million
(2007: 48 million) of our own shares,
representing 38 million
(2007: 48 million) or 3.1% (2007: 3.9%) of
common stock. In 2008, 15 million (2007: 27 million)
shares in aggregate were acquired under the buyback program at
an average price of approximately 33.34
(2007: 36.85) per share,
representing 15 million
(2007: 27 million) or 1.2% (2007: 2.2%) of
common stock. We transferred 3 million shares to employees
during the year (2007: 5 million shares) at an average
price of 26.43 (2007: 28.13) per share and
we reduced the number of common shares by 21 million shares
(corresponding to 21 million) due to
cancellation of shares in Treasury stock. The Company purchased
no SAP American depositary receipts (ADRs) in 2008.
(Each ADR represents one common share of SAP AG). The Company
held no SAP ADRs as at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
F-58
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income/Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss consisted of the
following as at December 31:
Other
Components of Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments comprise all foreign currency
differences arising from the translation of the financial
statements of foreign operations.
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities represent
the net cumulative change between fair value and cost for
available-for-sale financial assets since the respective
acquisition date.
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized pension costs comprise actuarial gains and losses
relating to defined benefit pension plans and similar
obligations.
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on foreign currency cash flow hedges comprise
the net change in fair value of foreign currency cash flow
hedges related to hedged transactions that have not impacted
earnings, less the component of the financial instruments
gain or loss that was excluded from the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. In addition, gains and losses on the effective
part of interest rate hedges are also included.
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on STAR hedges comprise the net change in fair
value of cash flow hedging instruments associated with the
unrecognized portion of nonvested STARs (see Note 25).
|
|
|
|
Currency effects from intercompany long-term investments related
to intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a
long-term investment nature.
|
Miscellaneous
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz), the
amount of dividends available for distribution to SAP AGs
shareholders is based on the earnings of SAP AG as reported in
its statutory financial statements which are determined under
the accounting rules stipulated by the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch). For the year ending December 31, 2008,
the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of SAP AG propose
a dividend distribution in 2009 of 0.50 per share.
Dividends per share for 2007 and 2006 were 0.50
and 0.46, respectively, and were paid in the
immediately succeeding year in each case.
Additional Capital
Disclosures
The primary objective of our capital management is to ensure
that we maintain a stable capital structure with focus on
shareholders equity to uphold investor, creditor and
customer confidence and to ensure future development of our
business. We are focused on keeping our shareholders
equity base solid to ensure
F-59
independence, security, as well as a high financial flexibility
through a favorable impact on the conditions of potential future
borrowings if so required.
We currently do not have a credit rating with any rating agency.
Our debt ratio is relatively low at 49% (2007: 37%), and we so
far do not believe that a rating would have a substantial effect
on our current or future borrowing conditions and financing
possibilities.
Our goal is that we will continue to be able to return excess
liquidity to our shareholders by distributing annual dividends
as well as repurchasing treasury shares in future periods. The
amount of future dividends and the extent of future purchases of
treasury shares will be balanced with our effort to continue to
maintain an adequate liquidity status for the group.
In order to maintain or adjust our capital structure, we use
various instruments including share buybacks and the
determination of the amount of dividends paid to shareholders.
Furthermore, we manage our financial liabilities, for example by
entering into interest rate swaps on our borrowings.
The capital structure at the balance sheet date was as follows:
Capital
Structure
Our net income growth mainly reinforced shareholders
equity and minority interests in 2008, adding 730 million
(2007: 367 million). The equity ratio (that is,
the ratio of shareholders equity to total assets)
decreased to 51% (2007: 63%). This decrease is due to the fact
that our total liabilities increased 80%, mainly as a result of
the loan that we entered into to finance the acquisition of
Business Objects while our shareholders equity grew 11%.
Our debt ratio (total debt as a portion of total assets) rose
from 37% in 2007 to 49% in 2008.
We are predominantly equity-financed. This is also evident from
the fact that bank loans and overdrafts represented only 16% of
total assets as of December 31, 2008 (2007: 0.26%).
In 2008, we were able to distribute 594 million
in dividends from our 2007 earnings
(2007: 556 million). Aside from the distributed
dividend, in 2008 we also returned 487 million
to our shareholders by repurchasing our own shares
(2007: 1,005 million).
Commitments exist to sell treasury stock or issue common shares
in connection with our share-based payment plans as described in
Note 27. We have satisfied in all years presented and
expect to continue to satisfy commitments resulting from our
share-based payment plans through both, treasury stock and
capital increases.
F-60
|
|
(21)
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH
FLOW INFORMATION
|
Interest paid in 2008, 2007 and 2006 amounted
to 105 million, 6 million
and 4 million, respectively, while interest
received in 2008, 2007 and 2006 amounted
to 72 million, 142 million
and 124 million, respectively. Income taxes paid
in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, net of refunds,
was 882 million, 811 million,
and 866 million, respectively.
|
|
(22)
|
CONTINGENT
LIABILITIES
|
In the normal course of business, we usually indemnify our
customers against liabilities arising from a claim that our
software products infringe a third partys patent,
copyright, trade secret, or other proprietary rights. To date,
we have not incurred any material loss as a result of such
indemnification and have not recorded any material liabilities
related to such obligations in the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
We occasionally grant function or performance guarantees in
routine consulting contracts or development arrangements. Also,
our software license agreements generally include a clause
guaranteeing that the software substantially conforms to the
specifications as described in applicable documentation for a
period of six to 12 months from delivery. Our product and
service warranty liability, which is measured based on
historical experience and evaluation, is included in Provisions
(see Note 19b).
For contingent liabilities related to litigation matters, see
Note 24.
As at December 31, 2008 and 2007, no guarantees were
provided for the performance or financial obligations of third
parties.
|
|
(23)
|
OTHER FINANCIAL
COMMITMENTS
|
Other financial commitments amounted
to 1,112 million, 850 million
and 849 million as at December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively, and primarily comprise commitments
under rental contracts and operating leases
of 863 million, 649 million
and 657 million as at December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively. Those commitments relate primarily
to the lease of office space, cars, and office equipment. As at
December 31, 2008, the future minimum sublease payments
expected to be received was 16 million. In
addition, financial commitments existed in the form of purchase
commitments totaling 79 million in 2008
(97 million in 2007 and 74 million in
2006). These commitments relate primarily to construction on new
and existing facilities, office equipment and car purchase
commitments. The remaining commitments
totaling 170 million in 2008
(104 million in 2007 and 118 million
in 2006) relate to various other third-party agreements.
Historically, the majority of such purchase commitments have
been realized. For financial commitments related to our pension
plans, see Note 19a.
F-61
Commitments under operating lease contracts and purchase
obligations as at December 31, 2008 were as follows:
Other
Financial Commitments
Rent expense
was 272 million, 209 million,
and 181 million for the years 2008, 2007, and
2006, respectively.
|
|
(24)
|
LITIGATION AND CLAIMS
|
Intellectual
Property Litigation
In September 2006,
U.S.-based
i2 Technologies US, Inc. and i2 Technologies, Inc.
(i2) instituted legal proceedings in the United States against
SAP. i2 alleged that SAPs products and services infringe
one or more of the claims in each of seven patents held by i2.
In its complaint, i2 sought unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief. In August 2007, SAP instituted
legal proceedings in the United States against i2. In April
2008, SAP amended the complaint to add a third patent. SAP
alleged, per the amended complaint, that i2s products
infringe one or more of the claims in each of three patents held
by SAP. In its complaint, SAP sought unspecified monetary
damages and permanent injunctive relief. In June 2008 SAP and i2
resolved this dispute. The terms of the settlement agreement
provided SAP to make a one-time cash payment to i2 and for SAP
to receive a license to all i2 patents.
In October 2006,
U.S.-based
Sky Technologies LLC (Sky) instituted legal proceedings in the
United States against SAP and Oracle. Sky alleges that
SAPs products and services infringe one or more of the
claims in each of five patents held by Sky. In its complaint,
Sky seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive
relief. The claim construction hearing (Markman hearing) was
held in June 2007. The legal proceedings have been stayed
pending a decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit with respect to an interlocutory appeal.
In January 2007, German-based CSB-Systems AG (CSB) instituted
legal proceedings in Germany against SAP. CSB alleges that
SAPs products and services infringe one or more of the
claims of a German patent and a German utility model held by
CSB. In its complaint, CSB has set the amount in dispute
at 1 million and is seeking permanent injunctive
relief. Within these proceedings CSB is not precluded from
requesting damages in excess of the amount in dispute. In July
2007, SAP filed its response in the legal proceedings including
a nullity action and cancellation proceeding against the patent
and utility model, respectively. The infringement hearing has
been re-scheduled for May 2009. The nullity hearing on the
German patent was held in January 2009 and the German Court
determined that the patent is invalid. CSB may appeal.
F-62
In March 2007,
U.S.-based
Oracle Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries
(Oracle) instituted legal proceedings in the United
States against TomorrowNow, Inc. and its parent company, SAP
America, Inc. and SAP Americas parent company SAP AG
(SAP). Oracle filed an amended complaint in June
2007, a second amended complaint in July 2008 and a third
amended complaint in October 2008. As amended, the lawsuit
alleges copyright infringement, violations of the Federal
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the California Computer Data
Access and Fraud Act, unfair competition, intentional and
negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and
civil conspiracy. The lawsuit alleges that SAP unlawfully copied
and misappropriated proprietary, copyrighted software products
and other confidential materials developed by Oracle to service
its own customers. The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief and
unspecified monetary damages including punitive damages. In July
2007, SAP and TomorrowNow filed their response to the first
amended complaint. In October 2008, SAP and TomorrowNow filed a
motion to dismiss in response to Oracles third amended
complaint. The Court granted the motion in-part which eliminated
certain plaintiffs from the lawsuit. Subsequently, in December
2008, SAP filed an answer to the third amended complaint as
revised pursuant to the Courts ruling on the motion to
dismiss. The trial is scheduled for February 2010. Additionally,
in June 2007, SAP became aware that the United States Department
of Justice had opened an investigation concerning related issues
and had issued subpoenas to SAP and TomorrowNow; SAP and
TomorrowNow are cooperating with the investigation and are
responding to the original subpoenas and additional subpoenas
issued by the Department of Justice. In February 2009 a
settlement conference was held. No settlement was reached.
In April 2007,
U.S.-based
Versata Software, Inc. (formerly Trilogy Software, Inc.)
(Versata) instituted legal proceedings in the United States
against SAP. Versata alleges that SAPs products and
services infringe one or more of the claims in each of five
patents held by Versata. In its complaint, Versata seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief. A
first claim construction hearing (Markman hearing) was held in
June 2008. A second Markman hearing is scheduled for March 2009.
The trial has been scheduled for August 2009.
In August 2007,
U.S.-based
elcommerce.com, Inc. (elcommerce) instituted legal proceedings
in the United States against SAP. elcommerce alleges that
SAPs products and services infringe one or more of the
claims in one patent held by elcommerce. In its complaint,
elcommerce seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent
injunctive relief. The trial has been scheduled for January 2011.
In August 2007, Canadian-based JuxtaComm, Inc. (JuxtaComm)
instituted legal proceedings in the United States against
Business Objects and several other defendants. JuxtaComm alleges
that Business Objects products infringe one or more of the
claims in one patent held by JuxtaComm. In its complaint,
JuxtaComm seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent
injunctive relief. The trial has been scheduled for November
2009.
In November 2007,
U.S.-based
Diagnostic Systems Corp. (DSC) instituted legal proceedings in
the United States against SAP and several other defendants.
Among the defendants is Business Objects, which was sued by DSC
prior to it being acquired by SAP. DSC alleges that SAPs
products and services infringe one or more of the claims in one
patent held by DSC. In its complaint against SAP, DSC seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief. In
its complaint against Business Objects, which also alleges
infringement of one or more claims in one DSC patent, DSC seeks
unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive relief.
The legal proceedings had been stayed pending a decision from
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with respect to a
Writ of Mandamus. In January 2009, the legal proceedings were
re-activated. A trial date has not yet been set.
In May 2008,
U.S.-based
InfoMentis, Inc. (InfoMentis) instituted legal
proceedings in the United States against SAP. InfoMentis alleges
copyright infringement and unfair competition. The lawsuit seeks
unspecified monetary damages and a permanent injunction. SAP
filed its response in August 2008. A trial date has not yet been
set.
F-63
In July 2008,
U.S.-based
Implicit Networks (Implicit) instituted legal proceedings in the
United States against SAP and several other defendants. Implicit
alleges that SAPs products and services infringe one or
more of the claims of two patents held by Implicit. In its
complaint, Implicit seeks unspecified monetary damages and
permanent injunctive relief. SAP filed its response in November
2008. A trial date has not yet been set.
In July 2008,
U.S.-based
Aloft Media (Aloft) instituted legal proceedings in the United
States against SAP and several other defendants. Aloft alleges
that SAPs products and services infringe one or more of
the claims of two patents held by Aloft. In its complaint, Aloft
seeks unspecified monetary damages and permanent injunctive
relief. SAP filed its response in October 2008. A trial date has
not yet been set.
Other Litigation
In January 2008,
U.S.-based
Acorn Systems, Inc. (Acorn) instituted legal
proceedings in the United States against SAP. Acorn filed an
amended complaint in March 2008. As amended, the lawsuit alleges
breach of contract, fraud and fraudulent inducement, negligent
misrepresentation, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations
of the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 1983, and
unfair competition. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary
damages, although Acorn alleges in the complaint that it has
suffered at least $116 million in damages. In February
2008, SAP filed a response to the original complaint and, in
March 2008, instituted legal proceedings against Acorn in the
Commercial Court of Brussels asking the Court to declare, inter
alia, that SAP had not breached the contract, that SAP did not
commit fraud and that SAP had not misappropriated Acorn trade
secrets. SAP and Acorn have resolved these disputes and SAP has
made a payment to Acorn.
In April 2008, South African-based Systems Applications
Consultants (PTY) Limited (Securinfo) instituted legal
proceedings in South Africa against SAP. Securinfo alleges that
SAP has caused one of its subsidiaries to breach a software
distribution agreement with Securinfo. In its complaint,
Securinfo seeks damages of
approximately 610 million plus interest. In
September 2008, SAP filed a motion to dismiss. A trial date has
not yet been set.
In April 2008,
U.S.-based
Wellogix, Inc. (Wellogix) instituted legal
proceedings in the United States against SAP as well as several
other defendants. Wellogix alleges several causes of action
including, but not limited to, breach of joint
venture/partnership agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud,
negligent misrepresentation, and misappropriation of
confidential information. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary
damages. SAP filed its responds in May 2008. In December 2008,
the Court granted SAPs motion to dismiss indicating the
legal proceedings were improperly initiated in Texas. Wellogix
may appeal.
We are also subject to a variety of other claims and lawsuits
that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our
business, including proceedings and claims that relate to
companies which we have acquired. We will continue to vigorously
defend against all claims and lawsuits against us. We make a
provision for a liability for such matters when it is both
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the loss can be reasonably estimated. We currently believe that
resolving all claims and lawsuits against us, individually or in
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial position, income, or cash flows.
Consequently, the provisions currently recorded for these claims
and lawsuits are neither individually nor in aggregate material
to SAP. However, all claims and lawsuits involve risk and could
lead to significant financial or reputational damage to the
parties involved. Because of significant inherent uncertainties
related to these matters, there can be no assurance that our
business, financial position, income or cash flows will not be
materially adversely affected nor can we reliably estimate the
maximum possible loss in the case of an unfavorable outcome.
|
|
(25)
|
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
In order to reduce risks resulting from fluctuations in
foreign-currency exchange rates, risks resulting from future
cash flows associated with share-based compensation granted to
employees and risks resulting from
F-64
variable interest payments we enter derivative financial
instruments. The hedging strategy is set by our Treasury
Guideline. The fair values of our derivative financial
instruments were as follows:
Fair
values of Derivative Financial Instruments
Currency Hedging
As a globally active enterprise, we are subject to risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
in our ordinary operations. Foreign currency-denominated
receivables, payables, debt, and other balance sheet positions,
and future cash flows resulting from anticipated transactions
including intra-group transactions are subject to currency
risks. We manage our currency risk exposure on a Group-wide
basis using primarily foreign exchange forward contracts and
currency options.
Derivatives
without designated hedge relationship
Foreign exchange derivatives entered into by us to offset
exposure due to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and
liabilities or anticipated cash flows which are not designated
as being in a hedge accounting relationship are marked to market
at each reporting period, with gains and losses recognized in
profit or loss.
In addition, this line item contains foreign currency
derivatives embedded in nonderivative host contracts that are
separated and accounted for as derivatives according to the
requirements of SFAS 133.
F-65
Derivatives with
designated hedge relationship (cash-flow hedges)
We are exposed to risks associated with anticipated intercompany
cash flows in foreign currencies resulting from intercompany
royalty payments and operating expenses charged within the
Group. Most of SAP AGs subsidiaries have entered into
license agreements with SAP AG pursuant to which each subsidiary
has acquired the right to sublicense SAP AG software products to
customers within a specific territory. Under these license
agreements, the subsidiaries are generally required to pay SAP
AG a royalty equivalent to a percentage of the software and
support services fees charged by them to their customers within
30 days following the end of the month in which the
subsidiary recognizes the revenue. These intercompany royalties
payable to SAP AG are mostly denominated in the respective
subsidiaries local currency. This leads to a
centralization of the foreign currency risk with SAP AG in
Germany as the royalties are to be paid in subsidiarys
local currency while the functional currency of SAP AG is the
euro. In addition, operating expenses arising in entities purely
dedicated to development activities are charged in their
functional currencies to Business Objects USA and Business
Objects Software Ireland leading to a centralization of foreign
currency risk in those two entities.
We enter into derivative instruments, primarily foreign exchange
forward contracts, to hedge significant anticipated cash flows
in foreign currencies from foreign subsidiaries. Specifically,
we exclude the interest and the time value component and only
designate the spot price of the foreign exchange forward
contracts and the intrinsic value of the currency options,
respectively, as hedging instrument to offset anticipated cash
flows relating to countries with significant operations,
including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan,
Switzerland, Canada, and Australia. We generally use foreign
exchange derivatives that have maturities of 15 months or
less, which may be rolled over to provide continuing coverage
until the applicable royalties are received.
In 2008, net losses totalling 32 million (2007:
net gains of 48 million) resulting from the
change in the component of the derivatives designated as hedging
instruments were taken directly to Other comprehensive income.
For the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007, no highly
probable transaction designated as a hedged item in a cash flow
hedge relationship ceased to be probable of occuring. Therefore,
we did not discontinue any of our cash flow hedge relationships.
Also, we did not identify any ineffectiveness for these hedges
for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007 and thus did not record fair
value changes in profit or loss. In 2008, we reclassified net
losses of 16 million
(2007: 38 million) out of other comprehensive
income/loss to profit or loss due to the hedged items affecting
income. Generally, the cash flows of the forecasted transactions
are expected to occur and therefore affect profit and loss
monthly within a timeframe of 15 months from the balance
sheet date. It is estimated that 28 million of
the net losses recognized in other comprehensive income on
December 31, 2008 will be reclassified into earnings during
fiscal year 2009.
Share-based
compensation hedging
We hedge certain cash flow exposures associated with both
recognized and unrecognized share-based compensation (see
Note 27) through the purchase of derivative
instruments from independent financial institutions.
As at December 31, 2008 and 2007, the following derivatives
were designated as hedging instruments for the STAR 2008, 2007,
and STAR 2006 programs, respectively, and for the SOP 2007
program.
F-66
Share-based
compensation Hedges
|
|
|
*
|
|
with designated hedge relationship
|
The terms of the derivative financial instruments are each
designed to reflect the terms of the underlying share-based
compensation program. For the STAR programs, the derivatives
reflect the eight measurement dates and weighting factors
applicable to the STAR program, as described in Note 27.
The number of options expiring at each measurement date, reflect
the respective weighting factor of that date. The payment date
of each option reflects the payout date of the STAR program that
it hedges. Viewed together, we will receive from the financial
institution 100% of the first 12.50 in appreciation of the
SAP AG stock price above the STAR exercise price, 50% of the
next 12.50 appreciation of the SAP AG stock price above
the STAR exercise price, and 25% of any additional appreciation
of the SAP AG stock price above the STAR exercise price. For the
SOP program, the derivative reflects the exercise hurdle of 110%
of the base value as well as the cap at a stock price of 200% of
the exercise price. The terms of these derivative financial
instruments require cash settlement, and there are no settlement
alternatives. These derivative financial instruments are
accounted for as Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair value of our share-based compensation hedges is
calculated considering risk-free interest rates, the remaining
term of the derivatives, the dividend yields and the share price
and the volatility of SAP stock.
The change in fair value of the derivatives in a designated
hedge relationship attributable to the nonvested portion is
recorded directly in Other comprehensive income with the
resulting deferred tax liability recorded separately. The amount
recognized directly in Other comprehensive income is used to
offset compensation expense on the underlying share-based
compensation programs recognized over the vesting period. The
fair values of the derivative instruments related to the
underlying share-based compensation programs are based on market
data reflecting current market expectations.
In 2008, a net result of 0 million (2007: a net
result of 0 million; 2006: a net gain of
7 million) was recorded in Financial income, net.
Based on the valuation of the share-based compensation hedges,
compensation expense was increased by 40 million
(2007: increased by 19 million; 2006: reduced by
72 million).
F-67
In 2008, net gains of 22 million (2007:
7 million) were taken directly to Other comprehensive
income/loss. For the years ending December 31, 2008 and
2007, no gains or losses were reclassified from Accumulated
other comprehensive income as a result of the discontinuance of
share-based compensation hedges because it was probable that the
original forecasted transaction would not occur. We did not
record any ineffectiveness for these hedges for the fiscal years
2008 and 2007. In 2008, we reclassified net losses of
13 million (2007: 19 million) out of other
comprehensive income/loss to profit or loss due to the hedged
items affecting income. We estimate that 1 million of
net losses included in Accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31, 2008 will be reclassified into earnings during
the next year.
Interest Rate Hedging
We have partly financed the acquisition of Business Objects S.A.
by entering into a syndicated term loan facility. The interest
payments related to this facility depend on the reference rate
of EURIBOR. In order to hedge for the cash-flow risk resulting
from fluctuations in future interest payments related to the
syndicated term loan facility, we entered into several interest
rate payer swaps as hedging instruments. Through the interest
rate payer swaps, the underlying floating rate of the facility
is economically converted into a fixed rate as the changes in
the cash flows of the hedged items resulting from changes in
EURIBOR are offset against the changes in the cash flows of the
interest rate swaps. At December 31, 2008, the volume of
the interest rate derivatives covered the total volume of the
syndicated term loan facility.
Although all interest rate payer swaps we hold constitute
effective economic hedges, not all qualify for hedge accounting
treatment. In order to hedge for the risk in variable cash flows
even before the acquisition date, we entered several deal
contingent interest rate swaps which we kept after the
acquisition date. Due to these interest rate derivatives being
contingent with regard to uncertainty of the acquisition and the
resulting facility, the derivatives did not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment at year-end 2007.
Derivatives
without designated hedge relationship
As the above mentioned deal contingent interest rate derivatives
and the term facility have different parameters, a hedge
accounting treatment was not established after the acquisition
date. Hence, the deal contingent interest rate payer swaps are
recorded at fair value with any changes in fair value charged to
profit and loss and we recorded losses of 7 million
in Financial income, net in the financial year 2008 (2007: gains
of 1 million). At December 31, 2008, we had
interest rate derivatives without designated hedge relationship
with a negative fair value of 7 million (2007:
positive fair value of 1 million).
Derivatives with
designated hedge relationship cash-flow
hedges
At December 31, 2008, we had interest rate derivatives with
a designated hedge relationship with a negative fair value of
16 million (2007: 0 million) for which net
losses of 15 million of the 2008 financial year due
to the designation as cash-flow hedging instruments were
recorded in Other comprehensive income/loss. Due to the interest
rate derivatives being contingent with regard to the acquisition
of Business Objects, S.A., a hedge accounting relationship was
not established at year end 2007 and changes in the fair value
in 2007 were recorded in Financial income, net. Therefore, no
amounts were removed from equity and included in profit and
loss. We did not record any ineffectiveness for these hedges for
the fiscal year 2008.
(26) FINANCIAL
RISK MANAGEMENT
We are exposed to various financial risks, including changes in
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, equity prices
and the creditworthiness of our counterparties.
We manage credit, liquidity, interest rate, equity price and
foreign currency exchange risks on a Group-wide basis. Selected
derivatives are exclusively used for this purpose and not for
speculation which is defined as entering into derivative
instruments without a corresponding underlying transaction.
Financial risk management is done centrally. It is regulated by
internal guidelines and undergoes continuous internal risk
analysis.
F-68
For the presentation of market risks, we use sensitivity
analyses that show the effects of hypothetical changes of
relevant risk variables on income and Other comprehensive
income/loss depending whether fair value fluctuations affect
earnings or Shareholders equity. The periodic effects are
determined by relating the hypothetical changes in the risk
variables to the balance of financial instruments at the
reporting date.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Risk
Foreign currency exchange risk is the risk of loss due to
adverse changes in foreign exchange rates. As a globally active
enterprise, we are subject to risks associated with fluctuations
in foreign currencies with regard to our ordinary operations.
Foreign currency-denominated receivables, payables, debt, and
other monetary balance sheet positions as well as future cash
flows resulting from forecasted transactions including
intra-group transactions are subject to currency risks as
described in Note 25. Risks from foreign currencies are
continuously assessed. Most of these transactions are hedged to
the extent that they influence our income and cash flows.
Under U.S. GAAP, foreign exchange risks arise on account of
monetary financial instruments denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency where the nonfunctional currency is
the respective risk variable; translation risks are not taken
into consideration. Because the individual Group entities mainly
conduct their operating business in their own functional
currencies, our risk of exchange rate fluctuations from ongoing
ordinary operations is not considered significant.
With regard to our investing and financing activities we are not
exposed to any significant foreign exchange risk as all
activities are conducted in the respective functional currency.
We disclose our risk exposure based on a sensitivity analysis
using the following assumptions:
According to our general policy not to invoice in currencies
other than the entitys functional currency, the
majority of our nonderivative monetary financial instruments
such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, loans to
employees and third parties, bank liabilities, and other
financial liabilities are denominated in the respective
entities functional currency. Thus, a foreign exchange
risk in these transactions is nonexistent. In exceptional cases
and limited economic environments, operating transactions are
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency
leading to a currency risk for the related monetary instruments.
Where we hedge against currency impacts on cash flows, these
foreign currency-denominated financial instruments are
economically converted into the functional currency by the use
of forward exchange contracts or options. Therefore,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates do not have a
significant impact on profit and loss or shareholders equity
with regard to our nonderivative monetary financial instruments.
Furthermore, income or expenses on the nonderivative monetary
financial instruments discussed above are always recognized in
the relevant entitys functional currency. Therefore,
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates have no significant
impact on profit and loss or shareholders equity in this
regard.
Our freestanding derivatives designed for hedging currency risks
almost completely balance the changes in the fair values of the
hedged item attributable to exchange rate movements in the
income statement in the same period. As a consequence, the
hedged items and the hedging instruments are not exposed to
currency risks with an effect on profit or loss, or
shareholders equity either.
Consequently, we are only exposed to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations with regard to:
|
|
|
|
|
derivatives held within a designated cash-flow hedging
relationship and
|
|
|
|
foreign currency embedded derivatives (which arise for instance
due to a foreign-currency denominated contract in Switzerland).
|
As all our cash-flow hedges in a hedge relationship are
effective, the fluctuations in the respective currencies affect
Other comprehensive income/loss. The interest element which is
not part of the assigned hedging relationship and is posted to
profit and loss is not affected by currency fluctuations. As we
do not have a significant exposure to a single currency, we
disclose our exposure to our major currencies (as described in
Note 25) in total. If, at December 31, 2008, the
euro had gained (lost) 10% against all our major currencies, the
F-69
Unrealized foreign currency cash-flow hedge position in Other
comprehensive income/loss would have been 65 million
(December 31, 2007: 64 million) higher (lower)
than presented.
Any change in the value of our foreign currency embedded
derivatives is recorded in profit or loss. If, at
December 31, 2008, the euro had gained (lost)
10 percent against the Swiss franc, the effect on other
nonoperating income would have been 40 million
(December 31, 2007: 37 million) higher (lower)
than presented. If at December 31, 2008, the euro had
gained (lost) 10 percent against all other currencies, the
effect on other nonoperating income would have been
3 million (December 31, 2007: 3 million)
lower (higher) (December 31, 2007: higher (lower)) than
presented.
Interest-Rate Risk
Interest-rate risks result from changes in market interest rates
which can cause changes in the fair value of fixed-rate
instruments and interest to be paid for variable-rate
instruments.
This risk is negligible with regard to our operating activities.
Interest rate risks arise on account of our investing activities
in debt instruments and our financing activities in connection
with financial liabilities. In order to create a balanced
structure of fixed and variable financial cash flows, we manage
interest-rate risk by adding interest rate-related derivative
instruments to a given portfolio of investments and debt
financing.
Due to the short maturities of our investments (all our debt
securities are classified as current) we do not have a
significant interest-rate risk related to financial assets (see
Note 13).
As described in Note 25, we entered into derivative
financial instruments to hedge the interest rate risk resulting
from the variable interest rate credit facility in connection
with the acquisition of Business Objects S.A.
A sensitivity analysis is provided to show our interest rate
risk exposure at the balance sheet date based on the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in interest rates only affect nonderivative fixed-rate
financial instruments if they are recognized at fair value. As
we have classified our investments as available for sale we
carry interest-rate sensitive debt investments at fair value
with fair value changes recognized in Other comprehensive
income/loss. For this reason, changes in prevailing market rates
are included in the equity-related sensitivity calculation.
|
|
|
|
Income or expenses for nonderivative financial instruments with
variable interest are subject to interest rate risk if they are
not hedged items in an effective hedging relationship. We
therefore have no significant interest-rate risk arising from
our financial liabilities and consider interest rate changes for
our variable rate debt investments in the earnings-related
sensitivity calculation.
|
|
|
|
Due to the aforementioned designation of interest rate
derivatives to a cash-flow hedge relationship, the respective
interest rate changes affect the Unrealized interest rate
cash-flow hedge position in Other comprehensive income/loss. The
movements related to the interest rate swaps variable leg
are not reflected in the sensitivity calculation as they offset
the variable interest payments for the credit facility. We
therefore consider only changes from the interest rate
swaps fixed leg in the equity-related sensitivity
calculation for the interest swaps in a hedge relationship.
|
|
|
|
As the deal contingent interest rate payer swaps are
freestanding derivatives with fair value fluctuations charged to
profit or loss we include only changes from the interest rate
swaps fixed leg in the earnings-related sensitivity
calculation. The movements related to the interest rate
swaps variable leg are not reflected in the sensitivity
calculation as they offset the variable interest payments for
the credit facility.
|
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the unrealized
gains/losses on marketable securities position in Other
comprehensive income/loss would have been 0 million
(December 31, 2007: 2 million) lower (higher)
than presented.
F-70
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates for our variable
rate debt investments had been 100 basis points higher
(lower), the financial income, net would have been
3 million (December 31, 2007:
1 million) higher (lower) than presented.
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the Unrealized interest
rate cash-flow hedge position in other comprehensive income/loss
would have been 1 million (December 31, 2007:
0 million) lower (higher) than presented.
If, at December 31, 2008, interest rates had been
100 basis points higher (lower), the impact on financial
income, net from deal contingent interest rate payer swaps would
have been 0 million higher (lower) (December 31,
2007: 9 million higher and 7 million
lower, respectively) than presented.
Equity-Price Risk
Equity-price risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in
equity markets. Our investments consist of listed and non-listed
securities held for purposes other than trading and are
classified as available for sale. Our equity investments in
listed securities are accounted for at fair value with fair
value changes recorded in Other comprehensive income/loss and
are monitored based on the current market value that is affected
by the fluctuations in the volatile stock markets worldwide. An
assumed 20% increase (decrease) in equity prices as at
December 31, 2008 would not have a material impact on the
value of our investments in marketable securities (2007:
1 million) with corresponding entries in Other
comprehensive income/loss.
The equity investments in non-listed securities are monitored
individually. Those securities are recognized at cost, because
market values are generally not observable. They are subject to
an annual impairment test.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of economic loss of principal or
financial rewards stemming from counterpartys failure to
repay or service debt according to the contractual obligations.
We are exposed to credit-related losses through our operating
and investing activities.
Credit risk from our operations comprises the default risk of
customers and counterparties to derivatives we hold to hedge
risks inherent in our operating activities. The default risk of
customers is managed separately, mainly based on assessing
creditworthiness through external ratings and our historical
experience with respective customers. Outstanding debts are
continuously monitored locally. Credit risks are taken into
account through individual and portfolio impairments (described
in detail in Note 3 and Note 14). In terms of the
overall credit risk exposure from these operations, the impact
of receivables from single customers is limited due to our large
customer base and its distribution across many different
industries and countries worldwide. To mitigate the credit risk
we conduct all of our hedging activities with approved major
financial institutions that carry high external credit ratings.
In addition, the concentration of credit risk that exists when
counterparties are involved in similar activities operating in
the same industry and geographical area is further mitigated by
diversification of counterparties throughout the world and by an
internal limit system for each individual counterparty. The
maximum exposure to credit risk from operating activities is
limited to the carrying amounts of our accounts receivable and
the derivative financial assets held to hedge operating risks.
Credit risk from our investing activities relates to cash and
cash equivalents, debt investments and other nonderivative
financial assets. In connection with the financial instruments
discussed above, we are exposed to credit-related losses to the
extent that banks or issuers of securities fail to fulfill their
financial obligations. To mitigate this risk we conduct all our
activities only with approved major financial institutions and
issuers that carry high external ratings. In addition, we
diversify our activities over multiple counterparties. This
approach is assured by detailed guidelines for the management of
financial risks stipulating that the business volume with each
individual counterparty depends on the lowest official long-term
credit rating available of at least one of the major rating
agencies or participation in the German Depositors
Guarantee Fund. In line with our risk
F-71
policy, investments are only allowed in approved investment
grade instruments. The maximum exposure to credit risk from cash
and cash equivalents, debt investments and other financial
assets is equal to the carrying amount of these assets.
No significant agreements reducing the maximum exposure to
credit risk had been concluded as at the reporting date.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk results from the potential inability to meet
financial obligations, such as payments to suppliers or
employees. Our Group-wide liquidity is generally managed by our
global treasury department through holding adequate volumes of
cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and maintaining
credit facilities.
Our main source of liquidity is our operating business,
generally generating those liquid funds needed to maintain our
investing and financing strategy. Unless restricted by local
regulations, subsidiaries pool their cash surplus to the global
treasury which then arranges to fund other subsidiaries
requirements or invest any net surplus in the market, seeking to
optimize yield while ensuring liquidity by investing only with
counterparties and issuers of high credit quality.
Apart from working capital and cash management, SAP has reduced
its liquidity risk by arranging an adequate volume of available
credit facilities with various financial institutions. For
details, see Note 18.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
We use various types of financial instruments in the ordinary
course of business. We use the following categories: loans and
receivables (L&R), available-for-sale (AFS), held for
trading (HFT) and amortized cost (AC). We neither designate our
financial assets and liabilities as at fair value through profit
or loss nor hold financial assets to maturity.
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial
instruments were as follows:
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
F-72
All financial instruments presented in the table above are
described in detail in Notes 13, 14, 15, 18, and 25. The
fair values of these financial instruments are determined as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, other
nonderivative financial assets: Because the financial assets are
primarily of short-term nature it is assumed that the fair
values of these assets approximate their carrying values.
Investments in insurance policies held for postemployment
pension plans and semiretirement as well as prepaid pensions are
valued at their cash surrender values. Non-interest-bearing or
below market-rate loans to third parties or employees are
discounted to the present value of estimated future cash flows
using the original effective interest rate the respective
borrower would have to pay to a bank for a similar loan. In case
of bad debts and sales allowances the carrying amount is reduced
accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Investments: The fair values of marketable securities are based
on quoted market prices as at December 31. For non-listed
equity securities fair values could not readily be observed due
to the absence of an active market with market prices. Also,
calculating fair values by discounting estimated future cash
flows is not possible as a determination of cash flows is not
reliable. Therefore, fair values for nonlisted equity securities
are not presented.
|
|
|
|
Bank liabilities: As almost all our bank liabilities are
variable interest debts their carrying values approximate their
fair values.
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other nonderivative financial liabilities:
Because these financial liabilities are mainly of short-term
nature it is assumed that their fair values approximate their
carrying values.
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments: The fair value of foreign
exchange forward contracts is based on discounting the expected
future cash flows over the respective zero-coupon interest
rates, spot rates and the remaining term of the contracts. The
fair value of the derivatives entered into to hedge our
share-based compensation programs are calculated considering
risk-free interest rates, the remaining term of the derivatives,
the dividend yields, the stock price and the volatility of our
share. Fair values of our derivative interest rate contracts are
calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows by
taking the prevailing market rates for the remaining term of the
contracts as a basis.
|
|
|
|
The fair values of nonderivative financial assets and
liabilities and of derivative financial instruments are
generally determined for each type of instrument on an
individual basis.
|
Determination of
Fair Values
SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or pay to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. In accordance with
SFAS 157, we have categorized our recurring basis of
financial assets and liabilities based on the priority of the
inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value
hierarchy.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (Level 3). The inputs used to measure fair value may
fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors
specific to the asset or liability.
The levels of the fair value hierarchy and its application to
our financial assets and liabilities are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities
|
F-73
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar
assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities; or
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little
or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets or liabilities
|
The following table allocates our financial assets and
liabilities to the three levels of the fair value hierarchy
according to SFAS 157:
Classification of
Financial Instruments
F-74
Fair Value
Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Valuation
Techniques Level 1
Measures of fair value of our time deposits and
available-for-sale debt securities were derived from quoted
prices traded in active markets.
Valuation
Techniques Level 2
All our Level 2 assets and liabilities consist of
derivative financial instruments. The fair value of the
derivatives is calculated by discounting the expected future
cash flows using relevant interest rates and spot rates over the
remaining term of the contracts.
Valuation
Techniques Level 3
The investments in our equity securities recorded at cost
consist primarily of venture capital investments. These
investments are recorded at cost because market values for those
securities are generally not readily obtainable. Our estimation
of fair value for our Level 3 investments includes a
comparison to similar companies based on revenue multiples and
review of each companies cash position, financing needs,
earnings and revenue outlook, operational performance,
management and ownership changes and competition.
F-75
Assets and
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets, including our equity method investments and
goodwill, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and
therefore are not included in the table above. These assets
include equity method investments that are recognized at fair
value at the end of the period to the extent that they are
deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. During fiscal year
2008, we did not record any other-than-temporary impairments on
those assets required to be measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis.
(27) SHARE-BASED
PAYMENT PLANS
Our total compensation expense recorded in connection with
share-based payment plans for the year 2008 was
63 million (2007: 95 million; 2006:
99 million). The total income tax benefit recognized
in the income statement for share-based payment plans was
48 million in 2008 (2007: 32 million;
2006: 13 million). The tax benefit realized from
stock options exercised during the annual period was
24 million (2007: 19 million; 2006:
14 million).
|
|
a)
|
Employee Discounted
Stock Purchase Programs
|
The Company acquires SAP AG common shares for various employee
stock purchase plans and transfers the shares to employees. We
record the discounts provided to employees through such plans as
compensation expense. The discounts provided to employees do not
exceed 15%.
|
|
b)
|
Cash-Settled
Share-Based Payment Plans
|
|
|
|
|
b.1)
|
Stock Appreciation
Rights (STAR) Plans
|
In March and April 2008, we granted approximately
18.5 million (2007: 18.7 million; 2006:
14.1 million) stock appreciation rights (2008
STARs, 2007 STARs and 2006 STARs
respectively) to selected employees who are not beneficiaries of
the SOP 2007 Plan explained further below. The 2008, 2007
and 2006 STAR grant-base values of 32.69, 35.71 and
42.12, respectively, are based on the average fair market
value of one common share over the 20 business days commencing
the day after the announcement of the Companys preliminary
results for the preceding fiscal year. The valuation of the
STARs is calculated quarterly over a period of two years. Each
quarterly valuation is weighted as follows in determining the
final valuation:
The valuations for quarters ending December 31 are calculated on
the basis of the amount by which the grant price is exceeded by
the average fair market value of one share of Common stock, as
quoted on Xetra, the trading system of the Frankfurt Stock
Exchange, over the 20 consecutive business days following the
announcement date of the Companys preliminary annual
results. The other quarterly valuations are calculated on the
basis of the amount by which the grant price is exceeded by the
average fair market value of one share of common share, as
quoted on Xetra, over the five consecutive business days
following the announcement of the Companys quarterly
results. Because each quarterly valuation is conducted
independently, it is unaffected by any other quarterly valuation.
The cash payout value of each STAR is calculated quarterly as
follows: (i) 100% of the first 12.50 value
appreciation for such quarter; (ii) 50% of the next
12.50 value appreciation; and (iii) 25% of any
additional value appreciation. Beneficiaries will receive
payments with respect to the 2008 STARs as follows: 50% on both
March 31, 2010 and January 31, 2011. Under the terms
of the 2007 STAR program, beneficiaries are scheduled to
F-76
receive an initial payment of 50% on March 31, 2009, and a
second installment on January 31, 2010. Beneficiaries will
receive STAR payments provided that they are still employees of
the Company on the payment dates, subject to certain exceptions.
As our STAR plans are settled in cash, rather than by issuing
equity instruments, a liability is recorded for such plans based
on the current fair value of the STAR awards at the reporting
date. The fair value of the STAR 2008 and 2007 awards was
estimated using a Monte-Carlo valuation model.
Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from
traded options on our stock with corresponding lifetimes and
exercise prices. The fair value as at December, 31 was
calculated on the basis of the following assumptions:
The fair value of the STAR 2006 awards was based on market data
that reflect current market expectations. The fair value of the
STAR awards is the same as the fair values of the derivatives
that are entered into to hedge the compensation expense for the
STAR 2007 awards as described in
Note 25 because the terms of the STAR awards
and the derivatives are the same. Compensation
expense including the effects of changes in the fair
value of the STAR award is accrued over the period
in which the employee performs the related service
(vesting period).
As at December 31, 2008, a STAR provision in the amount of
15 million (2007: 74 million; 2006:
132 million) was included in provisions in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The related STAR expense was affected by the
effects of the STAR hedge as described in
Note 25 and therefore totaled 28 million
(2007: 43 million, 2006: 28 million). The
STAR provision as at December 31, 2008, and the related
STAR expenses recorded during 2008, result from awards granted
under the 2008, 2007, and 2006 STAR programs.
In 2008, we paid to employees 1 million related to
STAR 2006 and 58 million related to STAR 2005. In
2007 we paid to employees 61 million related to STAR
2005 and 18 million related to STAR 2004.
The amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested share-based payment arrangements granted under the
STAR plans is dependent on the final intrinsic value of the
awards which itself depends on the future price of our common
share which we cannot reasonably predict. The final payout
amount will be recognized over a remaining period from
December 31, 2008 of 2.1 years for STAR 2008,
1.1 years for STAR 2007, and 0.1 year for STAR 2006.
|
|
|
|
b. 2)
|
Incentive Plan 2010
|
In January 2008 and January 2007, the Company granted
respectively 0.1 and 0.7 million stock appreciation rights
(rights) to top executives under the Incentive Plan
2010. The plan provides for a maximum payout of 144.60 per
right if the market capitalization of SAP AG doubles by
December 31, 2010. The rights issued to the beneficiaries
of this plan will automatically be exercised in case the
conditions for exercise are met. The base value of the rights is
the base market capitalization figure of 44,794,067,259,
calculated as 144.60 (average Xetra closing price of the
SAP AG stock in the period July 1 through December 31,
2005, prior to the capital increase as implemented on
December 21, 2006) times 309,779,165 shares
(number of issued shares minus the treasury shares on
December 31, 2005, prior to the capital increase
implemented on December 21, 2006).
F-77
For the Incentive Plan 2010, the relevant actual market
capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average closing
price of one SAP share in the Xetra trading system in the
measurement period (July 1 through December 31 of each year) by
the average number of SAP AG shares outstanding minus the
average number of treasury shares in the measurement period of
that year. The relevant actual market capitalization is
calculated annually in the first month after the end of each
measurement period, beginning in 2006 and ending in 2010.
The rights will only be exercisable if SAPs common share
outperforms the S&P North Software-Software
Indextm
(formerly GSTI Software Index) during the period between the
issue of the rights and December 31, 2010, or December 31
of the year with the last measurement period if the rights are
exercised before that date. Further, to be exercisable from 2006
through 2009, the actual market capitalization must not be less
than 200% of the base value.
The rights are not exercisable if exercise would result in a
windfall profit. The decision whether exercise results in a
windfall profit will be made by the Supervisory Boards
compensation committee at its sole discretion.
If the relevant actual market capitalization is 200% (or more)
of the base market capitalization and the other conditions are
met, the payout value per right will be 144.60.
If the increase between the base value and the relevant actual
market capitalization is below 200% of the base market
capitalization, the payout per award will be based on the
following scale:
Payout
per Award
If the plan pays out, beneficiaries will receive the payments
12 months after the compensation committee has determined
the exercise value.
The Incentive Plan 2010 is settled in cash rather than by
issuing equity instruments, so a liability is recorded for the
rights granted reflecting the fair value of the rights at the
reporting date. Compensation expense including the
effects of any changes in fair value of the rights
is accrued over the period the beneficiaries are expected to
perform the related service (vesting period).
The fair value of the rights is estimated using a Monte-Carlo
valuation model. Expected volatilities are based on implied
volatilities from traded options on our stock for options with a
corresponding lifetime and
F-78
exercise price. The expected life is based on our estimate of
the earliest point in time when the vesting conditions are
collectively met. The fair value as at December, 31 was
calculated using the following assumptions:
As at December 31, 2008 the provision for rights granted
under the Incentive Plan 2010 amounted to 2 million (2007:
3 million; 2006: 2 million).
The amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested rights granted under the Incentive Plan 2010 depends
on the final intrinsic value of the awards which itself depends
on the future price of our common shares and certain other
factors that we cannot influence or reasonably predict. The
final payout amount will be recognized over a remaining period
of up to two years from December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
b.3)
|
Virtual Stock Option
Plan 2007
|
In the first half of 2008 as well as in 2007, the Company
granted 8.7 and 7.0 million virtual stock options
respectively (stock appreciation rights, SAP
SOP 2007). The plan provides for cash settlement only
and is available to members of the SAP AG Executive Board,
members of subsidiaries executive boards, as well as to
eligible executives and other top performers of SAP AG and its
subsidiaries. The program replaced the SAP SOP 2002 Plan,
described below. The awards granted in 2008 and 2007 have a
respective grant-base value of 32.69 and 35.71,
which is based on the average fair market value of one common
share over the 20 business days following the announcement date
of the Companys preliminary results for the preceding
fiscal year.
Under the SAP SOP 2007 Plan, beneficiaries receive stock
appreciation rights (Virtual Stock Options or
rights) based on the SAP share price, which gives
them the right to receive a certain amount of money by exercise
under the terms and conditions of this plan.
Rights granted under this plan may be exercised after a vesting
period of two years starting on the grant date. The term of the
Virtual Stock Options is five years, i.e. the rights will expire
five years after the grant date if not exercised by the holder
before that date.
The exercise price is 110% of the base value. Thus, the right
can only be exercised if the share price at exercise exceeds the
grant price by at least 10%. Monetary benefits will be capped at
a share price of 200% of the exercise price.
The SAP SOP 2007 is settled in cash rather than by issuing
equity instruments, so a liability is recorded on the basis of
the current fair value of the outstanding Virtual Stock Options
at the reporting date. The fair value of the rights is estimated
using a binomial valuation method. Expected volatilities are
based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock
with a corresponding lifetime and exercise price. The expected
life of the options was determined to be 5 years. This
assumption was made based on expected exercise behavior since
F-79
no reliable historical data was available. The fair values as at
December, 31 were calculated using the following assumptions:
As at December 31, 2008, the provision for rights granted
under the SAP SOP 2007 Plan amounted to 36 million
(21 million as at December 31, 2007).
The amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested rights granted under the SAP SOP 2007 Plan
depends on the final intrinsic value of the awards which itself
depends on the future price of our common share and certain
other factors that we cannot influence or reasonably predict.
The final payout amount will be recognized over a remaining
period from December 31, 2008 of 3.9 years for
SOP 2007 granted in 2008, and of 3.1 years for
SOP 2007 granted in 2007.
|
|
|
|
b.4)
|
Business Objects
cash-settled awards based on former Business Objects option and
Restricted Stock Unit plans
|
Prior to being acquired by SAP, the employees of Business
Objects companies were granted equity awards giving rights to
Business Objects shares. Following the Business Objects
acquisition described in Note 4, and the squeeze-out on
February 18, 2008, the Business Objects shares were no
longer publicly traded. Therefore, SAP implemented mechanisms to
allow the employees to cash out their equity awards, either by
receiving cash instead of Business Objects shares (cash payment
mechanism or CPM) or by receiving Business Objects shares that
they subsequently sell to SAP (liquidity agreement mechanism or
LAM). The implementation of CPM and LAM resulted in substance in
a conversion of the 5.1 million equity awards outstanding
at February 18, 2008 to an equal number of cash settled
share-based payment awards (replacing awards) to replace the
stock options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) granted to them
by Business Objects prior to SAPs acquisition of Business
Objects (replaced awards).
The replaced awards comprised the following categories of awards:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options with a
4-year
monthly graded vesting schedule from grant date, subject to a
minimum of one year of continued service with the Company. The
contractual terms range from 7 10 years. The
exercise price for one sub-category of the awards was equal to
100% of the closing price of the Business Objects stock as
reported on the Eurolist by Euronext on the last trading day
prior to the option grant date; while the other subcategory of
awards the exercise price was 100% of the average of the opening
share price as reported on such market over the 20 trading days
immediately preceding the historical grant date.
|
|
|
|
International RSUs were subject to a
3-year
graded vesting schedule. These rights were provided free of
charge to the employees (no exercise price).
|
|
|
|
French RSUs had a two-year vesting period followed by a two-year
holding period. These rights were also provided to the employees
free of charge (no exercise price).
|
The replacing awards closely mirror the terms of the replaced
awards (including conditions such as exercise price and vesting)
except that
|
|
|
|
|
The replaced awards were planned to be settled by issuing equity
instruments whereas the replacing awards are settled in cash
either via the CPM or via the LAM mechanism.
|
F-80
|
|
|
|
|
The replaced awards were indexed to Business Objects share
price whereas the replacing awards are indexed to SAPs
stock price as follows: SAPs offering price for Business
Objects shares during the tender offer (42) is divided by
SAP AGs share price at the tender offer closing date
(32.28) and the result is multiplied by the weighted
average SAP share closing price during the 20 trading days
preceding the exercise or disposition date.
|
In countries where the CPM applies, the benefit resulting from
the stock option exercise or the RSU vesting is usually paid
directly to the employees by SAP.
In countries where the LAM applies an equity settlement was
retained but supplemented by the LAM. In these cases, the
employees continue to receive shares of Business Objects S.A.
upon stock options exercise and RSU vesting and have a put
option on these shares to resell the shares to SAP within
3 months from the exercise or vesting date, except for some
stock options exercise subject to French tax law, for which the
put option period is 2 years and 3 months. SAP has a
call option on these shares.
In both cases, these awards are accounted for as a cash-settled
award under SFAS 123R because the obligation to the
employee will ultimately be settled in cash only, both under the
CPM and the LAM mechanism.
As the replacing awards are settled in cash rather than by
issuing equity instruments, a liability is recorded on the basis
of the current fair value of the outstanding replacing awards at
the reporting date. The fair value of the rights is estimated
using a binomial valuation method. Expected volatilities are
based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock
with a corresponding lifetime and exercise price. The expected
life of the options was determined to be 3.7 years. This
assumption was made based on historical exercise behavior of
Business Objects employees.
The fair values as at December, 31 were calculated using the
following assumptions:
As at December 31, 2008, the provision for rights granted
under the Business Objects Plan amounted to 37 million.
In 2008 we paid to employees 36 million related to
the Business Objects Plan.
The amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested rights granted under the Business Objects Plan depends
on the final intrinsic value of the awards which itself depends
on the future price of our common share and certain other
factors that we cannot influence or reasonably predict.
The final payout amount will be recognized over a weighted
average remaining vesting period from December 31, 2008 of
1.6 years.
F-81
c) Equity
Settled Share-Based Payment Plans
|
|
|
|
c.1)
|
Stock Option Plan
2002
|
At the 2002 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the SAP AG
shareholders approved the SAP SOP 2002 Plan, which provides
for the issuance of stock options to members of the SAP AG
Executive Board, members of subsidiaries executive boards,
and to eligible executives and other top performers of SAP AG
and its subsidiaries. The SAP SOP 2002 Plan was designed to
replace the LTI 2000 Plan, described below. Under the SAP
SOP 2002 Plan, the Executive Board was authorized to issue,
on or before April 30, 2007, up to 19.0 million stock
options. In 2007, the SAP SOP 2002 Plan was replaced by the
SAP SOP 2007 Plan. The last stock options under the SAP
SOP 2002 Plan were granted in 2006.
Each stock option granted under the SAP SOP 2002 Plan
entitles its holder to subscribe to four shares of the
Companys common stock by tendering payment of an exercise
price per option equal to a base price and a premium of 10% of
the base price. The base price is calculated as the average
market price of SAP AGs common share on the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange during the five trading days preceding the issue
of the respective stock option, calculated on the basis of the
arithmetic mean of the closing auction prices of the stock in
the Xetra trading system. The options cannot be exercised at an
exercise price that is less than the closing auction stock price
on the day before the issue date. The term of the stock options
is five years. Subscription rights cannot be exercised until the
vesting period of two years has elapsed.
For options granted to members of the Executive Board during and
after February 2004, the SAP SOP 2002 Plans terms cap
the subscription rights if the Supervisory Board determines that
an option holder would make a windfall profit on exercising the
rights. A windfall profit is defined for this purpose as a
profit that, when combined with the profit from earlier
exercises of subscription rights issued to the option holder at
the same issuing date, exceeds twice the product of (i) the
number of subscription rights received by the option holder and
(ii) the exercise price. Such profit is determined as the
total of the differences, calculated individually for each
exercised subscription right, between the closing price of the
share on the exercise day and the exercise price. SAP AG has
undertaken to reimburse to the option holders any expenses they
may incur through fees, taxes, or deductions related to the cap.
The cap will only be imposed if the Supervisory Board determines
that the windfall profit results from significant extraordinary,
unforeseeable developments for which the Executive Board is not
responsible.
The fair value of the options granted under the SAP
SOP 2002 Plan was estimated as at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. For options
granted 2006 and 2005, the expected life of the options was
determined using the simplified method to be
3.5 years, which represented the average of the vesting
period and the contractual term of the awards. This approach was
used because we did not have sufficient information about the
historical exercise behavior of equity-based options granted to
our employees. For awards granted from 2002 to 2004, the
expected term of the awards was determined to be 2.5 years.
Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities of
traded options to purchase our common share granted in 2006 and
2005 and based on historical data for options granted between
2004 and 2002.
The fair values of the Companys share-based awards granted
under SAP SOP 2002 Plan were calculated using the following
assumptions and plan terms:
F-82
Activities in 2008 under Stock Option Plan 2002 were as follows:
Activities
under SAP SOP 2002
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of share options
granted during the years 2006 and 2005 was 26.47 and
20.08, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the years ending December 31, 2008, 2007,
and 2006 was 21 million, 59 million, and
46 million, respectively. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, we
recorded compensation expenses for SAP SOP 2002 in the
amount of 1 million, 26 million and
55 million respectively.
A summary of the status of our nonvested options as at
December 31, 2008, and changes during the year ending
December 31, 2008, is presented below:
Status of
Nonvested SAP SOP 2002 Options
As at December 31, 2008, no unrecognized cost related to
nonvested options granted under the SAP SOP 2002 remained.
c.2) Long Term
Incentive 2000 Plan
On January 18, 2000, SAP AGs shareholders approved
the LTI 2000 Plan. The LTI 2000 Plan is a share-based payment
program providing members of the SAP AG Executive Board, members
of subsidiaries executive boards and selected employees a
choice between convertible bonds, stock options, or a 50%
mixture of each. Beneficiaries were offered 25% more units if
they chose stock options than if they chose convertible bonds.
Under the LTI 2000 Plan, each convertible bond having a 1
nominal value is convertible into four common
F-83
shares over a maximum of 10 years, subject to service
vesting requirements. The conversion price is equal to the
market price of a common share as quoted on the Xetra trading
system on the day immediately preceding the grant. Each stock
option may be exercised in exchange for four common shares over
a maximum of 10 years, subject to the same vesting
requirements. The exercise price varies with the outperformance
of the common share price appreciation against the appreciation
of the S&P North Software-Software IndexTM (formerly GSTI
Software Index) from the day immediately preceding grant to the
day on which the exercise price is determined. Both the
convertible bonds and stock options vest as follows: 33% after
two years from date of grant, 33% after three years, and 34%
after four years. Forfeited convertible bonds or stock options
are disqualified and may not be reissued.
In total, 12.3 million conversion and subscription rights
were issued under the LTI 2000 Plan through March 14, 2002.
At the 2002 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, the
Companys shareholders revoked the authorization to issue
further convertible bonds and stock options under the LTI 2000
Plan.
A summary of the LTI 2000 Plan activity for both convertible
bonds and stock options is as follows:
Summary
of the LTI 2000 Plan
All convertible bonds and stock options outstanding as at
December, 31, 2008 are exercisable.
Due to the fact that all LTI 2000 Plans were fully vested during
2006, we recorded no compensation expenses in 2008 or 2007. In
2006, we recorded compensation expenses for the LTI 2000 Plan in
the amount of 11 million based on the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. The total intrinsic
value of stock options exercised during the years ending
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 was 5 million,
5 million and 27 million respectively. The
total intrinsic value of convertible bonds exercised during the
years ending December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 was
0 million, 0 million, and
6 million, respectively.
|
|
(28)
|
SEGMENT AND
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
Our internal reporting system produces reports in which business
activities are presented in a variety of ways, for example, by
line of business, geography and areas of responsibility of the
individual Executive Board
F-84
members (Board areas). Based on these reports, the Executive
Board, which is responsible for assessing the performance of
various company components and making resource allocation
decisions as a Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), evaluates
business activities in a number of different ways. While neither
the line of business structure, the geographic structure, nor
the Board areas are identified as primary, we have determined
that our lines of business constitute operating segments. We
have three reportable operating segments which are organized
based on products and services: Product, Consulting, and
Training.
The Product segment is primarily engaged in marketing and
licensing our software products, performing custom software
development services for customers, and providing support
services for our software products. The Consulting segment
performs various professional services, mainly implementation of
our software products. The Training segment provides educational
services on the use of our software products and related topics
for customers and partners.
Our management reporting system reports our inter-segment
services as cost reductions and does not track them as internal
revenues. Inter-segment services mainly represent utilization of
manpower resources of one segment by another segment on a
project-by-project
basis. Inter-segment services are charged based on internal cost
rates including certain indirect overhead costs but without
profit margin.
The accounting policies applied in the internal reporting to our
CODM differ from our U.S. GAAP accounting policies as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The internal reporting to our CODM generally attributes revenue
to the segment that is responsible for the related transaction
regardless of revenue classification in our income statement.
Thus, for example, the Training segments revenue includes
certain amounts classified as software revenue. Since our
segments are organized on the basis of products and services,
the amounts of external revenue for the Product, Consulting and
Training segments are materially consistent with the amounts of
Software and software-related service revenue, Consulting
revenue, and Training revenue, respectively, as reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
The internal reporting to our CODM allocates expenses to the
segments based on organizational structures and cost centers
rather than cost classification to functional areas.
|
|
|
|
The internal reporting to our CODM excludes share-based
compensation expenses.
|
|
|
|
Differences in foreign currency translations result in minor
deviations between the amounts reported internally to our CODM
and the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
Starting in 2008 we have made certain changes in our internal
management reporting which resulted in additional deviations
between the amounts reported internally to our CODM and the
amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
In contrast to our U.S. GAAP revenue figures presented in
our Consolidated Statements of Income, the revenue numbers in
our management reporting system include the support revenue that
would have been reflected by Business Objects had it remained a
standalone entity but are not permitted to be reflected as
revenue under U.S. GAAP as a result of fair value
accounting for Business Objects support contracts in effect at
the time of our acquisition of Business Objects.
|
|
|
|
In contrast to our U.S. GAAP income figures presented in
our Consolidated Statements of Income, the income measures in
our management reporting system include the full amount of
Business Objects support revenue and exclude acquisition-related
charges. Acquisition-related charges in this context comprise:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of intangibles acquired in business
combinations and standalone acquisitions of intellectual
property.
|
|
|
|
Expenses from purchased in-process research and development.
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses incurred in connection with business
combinations.
|
F-85
In prior years, acquisition-related charges were partially
included in the segment results, while the rest was shown under
development expenses and administration and other corporate
expenses. In 2008 we began excluding acquisition related charges
from the segments in our management reporting system. Therefore
we have adjusted the prior year figures in the tables below for
comparison purposes. Instead the acquisition related charges are
presented as a separate line item.
Segment
Revenue and Results
F-86
Reconciliation
of Revenues and Segment Results
Segment Revenues
Since our segments are organized on the basis of products and
services, the amounts of external revenue for the Product,
Consulting, and Training segments are materially consistent with
the amounts of Software and software-related service revenue,
Consulting revenue, and Training revenue, respectively, as
reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income, except for
the differences in accounting policies discussed above.
External revenue from services provided outside of the
reportable segments (2008: 16 million, 2007:
11 million, 2006: 10 million) mainly
represents revenue incidental to our main business activities
and minor currency translation differences.
Segment Result
Segment result reflects operating expenses directly attributable
or reasonably allocable to the segments, including costs of
product, costs of services, and sales and marketing expenses.
Costs that are not directly attributable or reasonably allocable
to the segments such as administration and other corporate
expenses are not included in the segment result. Development
expense is excluded from the segment result because our internal
management reporting measures the segment performance without
taking development expense into account. In addition, for
management purposes, share-based compensation expense,
write-down of support revenue and acquisition-related charges
are not included in the segment result.
Depreciation and amortization expenses reflected in the segment
result include the amounts directly attributable to each segment
and the depreciation and amortization portion of the facility
and IT-related expenses allocated to each segment based on
headcount, facility space and other measures.
F-87
A one-time effect of a change in estimate on allowance for
doubtful accounts in 2006 was allocated to the Product segment,
the Consulting segment, and the Training segment in the amounts
of 30 million, 13 million, and
2 million, respectively.
Development expense and administration and other corporate
expense are based on a management view and do not equal the
amounts under the corresponding caption in the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The differences are mainly due to the fact
that the management view focuses on organizational structures
and cost centers rather than cost classification to functional
areas.
Segment Assets
Segment asset information is not provided to the CODM. Goodwill
by reportable segment is disclosed in Note 16.
Geographic
Information
The following tables present revenue by location of customers
and by location of companies, which reflects the location of our
subsidiary responsible for the sale, and information about
certain long-lived assets detailed by geographic region.
Total
Revenue by Location
1) Europe, Middle East, Africa
F-88
Software
and Software-Related Service Revenue by Location
1) Europe, Middle East, Africa
Property,
Plant, and Equipment and Intangible Assets
1) Europe, Middle East, Africa
F-89
The total compensation of the Executive Board members for fiscal
year 2008 amounted to 25 million (2007:
25 million). This amount includes
5 million (2007: 3 million) fixed and
15 million (2007: 18 million)
performance-related compensation as well as 4 million
(2007: 4 million) share-based compensation and
additional only in 2006 17 million of nonrecurring
share-based compensation. The share-based compensation
corresponds to the grant date fair value of the 628,329 virtual
stock options (2007: 486,594) issued to Executive Board members
during the year. In 2008, the projected benefit obligation for
pensions to Executive Board members increased
1 million to 18 million (2007:
17 million). The annual pension entitlement of the
members of the Executive Board on reaching age 60 based on
entitlements from performance-based and salary-linked plans
amounted to 1 million as at December 31, 2008
(1 million as at December 31, 2007).
Subject to the adoption of the dividend resolution by the
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on
May 19, 2009, the total annual compensation of the
Supervisory Board members was 2 million (2007:
2 million). This amount includes 1 million
(2007: 1 million) fixed, 1 million (2007:
1 million) variable compensation, and
0.1 million (2007: 0.08 million) committee
remuneration. The Supervisory Board members do not receive any
share-based compensation for their services. As far as members
who are employee representatives on the Supervisory Board
receive share-based compensation, such compensation is for their
services as employees only and is unrelated to their status as
members of the Supervisory Board.
In 2008, the pension payments to former Executive Board members
were 1 million (2007: 1 million). The
projected benefit obligation of pensions as at December 31,
2008 for former Executive Board members was
12 million (2007: 12 million).
Payments of 4 million were agreed for Shai Agassi in
relation to the ending of his contract with SAP on
April 30, 2007.
Peter Zencke, who left SAP on December 31, 2008, will be
paid abstention compensation corresponding to 50% of his final
average contractual compensation during the continuance of a
12-month
postcontractual noncompeting period.
SAP did not grant any compensation advance or credit to, or
enter into any commitment for the benefit of, any member of the
Executive Board or Supervisory Board in fiscal year 2008, 2007,
or 2006.
F-93
On December 31, 2008, members of the Executive Board held a
total of 88,527 SAP shares (December 31, 2007: 86,515 SAP
shares) and members of the Supervisory Board held a total of
128,995,306 SAP shares (December 31, 2007: 128,993,710 SAP
shares).
Detailed information on the different elements of the
compensation as well as on the number of shares owned by members
of the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board are disclosed
in SAPs Compensation Report which is part of the Review of
SAP Group Operations and of SAPs Annual Report on
Form 20-F
both available on SAPs Web site.
|
|
(30)
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
Certain Executive Board and Supervisory Board members of SAP AG
currently hold, or held within the last year, positions of
significant responsibility with other entities as presented in
Note 29. We have relationships with certain of these
entities in the ordinary course of business, whereby we buy and
sell a wide variety of products and services at prices we
believe are consistent with those negotiated at arms
length between unrelated parties.
After his move from SAPs Executive Board to SAPs
Supervisory Board in May 2003, Hasso Plattner entered into a
contract with SAP AG under which he provides consulting services
for SAP. The contract provides for the reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses only which were immaterial to SAP in all
periods presented.
Hasso Plattner is the sole proprietor of H.P. Beteiligungs GmbH,
which itself holds 90% of Bramasol, Inc., Palo Alto, United
States. Bramasol is a SAP partner with which we generated
revenues which were immaterial to SAP in all periods presented.
The amounts charged to SAP for the services of Bramasol were
also immaterial in all periods presented.
Wilhelm Haarmann practices as a partner of the law firm HAARMANN
Partnerschaftsgesellschaft in Frankfurt. The amounts charged to
SAP for the services of HAARMANN Partnerschaftsgesellschaft were
immaterial to SAP in all periods presented.
|
|
(31)
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
FEES AND SERVICES
|
At SAP AGs Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on
June 3, 2008, SAPs shareholders mandated KPMG
Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Berlin (since
October 1, 2008 KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft), to serve as SAP AGs
independent auditors for the 2008 fiscal year. KPMG Germany and
other firms in the global KPMG network billed the following fees
to SAP for audit and other professional services related to 2008
and the two previous years:
Fees for Audit and
other Professional Services
Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG for the audit
of our consolidated annual financial statements as well as
audits of statutory financial statements of SAP AG and its
subsidiaries. Audit-related fees are fees charged by KPMG for
assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of our financial
statements and are not reported under Audit fees. This category
comprises fees billed for accounting advice on actual or
contemplated transactions and other agreed on procedures. Tax
fees
F-94
are fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for tax
advice on Group restructuring, transfer pricing, and other
actual or contemplated transactions, tax compliance, and
employee-related tax queries. The category All other fees
includes other support services, such as training and expert
advice on issues unrelated to accounting and taxes.
For services provided by KPMG Germany and its affiliates we
recorded expenses of 4.1 million in 2008 (2007:
2.7 million, 2006: 2.9 million), of which
3.3 million (2007: 2.5 million, 2006:
2.5 million) relate to audit services,
0.4 million (2007: 0.0 million, 2006:
0.0 million) relate to audit related services,
0.2 million (2007: 0.0 million, 2006:
0.0 million) relate to tax services, and
0.1 million (2007: 0.2 million, 2006:
0.4 million) relate to other services. The increase
since the previous year results from the greater number of KPMG
affiliates involved.
At the end of January 2009, we announced our intention to
continue the cost-reduction program and to take further measures
to reduce costs. Additionally, to enable SAP to adapt its size
to todays market conditions and the effects of the global
recession, we intend to reduce our workforce to 48,500 positions
worldwide by the end of 2009, by means of nonreplacement
wherever possible. We expect the restructuring associated with
the reduction in positions to cost 200 million to
300 million in 2009 and to produce annual savings of
some 300 million to 350 million beginning
in 2010.
F-95