e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-50743
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0602661 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
300 Third Street, Cambridge, MA
|
|
02142 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(617) 551-8200
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(do not check if smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At
July 29, 2011, the registrant had 42,651,782 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share,
outstanding.
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,110 |
|
|
$ |
74,599 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
150,839 |
|
|
|
158,532 |
|
Collaboration receivables |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,669 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
224,334 |
|
|
|
254,139 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
98,080 |
|
|
|
116,773 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
16,252 |
|
|
|
18,289 |
|
Investment in joint venture (Regulus Therapeutics Inc.) |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
3,616 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
340,828 |
|
|
$ |
393,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,949 |
|
|
$ |
9,312 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
11,116 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
80,721 |
|
|
|
81,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
100,534 |
|
|
|
102,046 |
|
Deferred rent, net of current portion |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion |
|
|
100,122 |
|
|
|
129,974 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
204,277 |
|
|
|
235,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4, 5 and 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 125,000,000 shares
authorized; 42,653,915 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2011; 42,343,423 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
509,826 |
|
|
|
500,443 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
714 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(373,456 |
) |
|
|
(343,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
136,551 |
|
|
|
158,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
340,828 |
|
|
$ |
393,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues from research collaborators |
|
$ |
20,614 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
$ |
41,511 |
|
|
$ |
51,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (1) |
|
|
25,303 |
|
|
|
28,136 |
|
|
|
51,652 |
|
|
|
52,836 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
8,429 |
|
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
18,653 |
|
|
|
21,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
33,732 |
|
|
|
38,243 |
|
|
|
70,305 |
|
|
|
74,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(13,118 |
) |
|
|
(11,626 |
) |
|
|
(28,794 |
) |
|
|
(22,932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of joint venture (Regulus Therapeutics Inc.) |
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
(3,919 |
) |
|
|
(2,084 |
) |
|
|
(5,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
(3,235 |
) |
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(4,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(13,824 |
) |
|
|
(14,861 |
) |
|
|
(30,109 |
) |
|
|
(27,166 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(13,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used to compute basic and
diluted net loss per common share |
|
|
42,379 |
|
|
|
41,991 |
|
|
|
42,369 |
|
|
|
41,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(13,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,955 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(14,052 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,069 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Non-cash stock-based compensation expenses included in
operating expenses are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
2,830 |
|
|
$ |
3,246 |
|
|
$ |
5,495 |
|
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(30,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,955 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
Non-cash income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
8,336 |
|
|
|
10,395 |
|
Charge for 401(k) company stock match |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Equity in loss of joint venture (Regulus Therapeutics Inc.) |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
5,497 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration receivables |
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
(2,091 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,547 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
(2,570 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(30,265 |
) |
|
|
(18,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(32,884 |
) |
|
|
(39,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(163,759 |
) |
|
|
(182,076 |
) |
Sales and maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
189,185 |
|
|
|
150,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
(34,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares to Novartis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
(71,286 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
74,599 |
|
|
|
137,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
67,110 |
|
|
$ |
66,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the Company or Alnylam) are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) applicable to interim
periods and, in the opinion of management, include all normal and recurring adjustments that are
necessary to present fairly the results of operations for the reported periods. The Companys
condensed consolidated financial statements have also been prepared on a basis substantially
consistent with, and should be read in conjunction with, the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, which were included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
on February 18, 2011. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial
statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results of the Companys
operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of the Companys
operations for any other interim period or for a full fiscal year.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of the
Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Alnylam U.S., Inc., Alnylam Europe AG (Alnylam Europe)
and Alnylam Securities Corporation. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated. The Company uses the equity method of accounting to account for its investment in
Regulus Therapeutics Inc. (Regulus).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per
common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares and dilutive potential common share equivalents then outstanding.
Potential common shares consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the
treasury stock method), and unvested restricted stock awards. Because the inclusion of potential
common shares would be anti-dilutive for all periods presented, diluted net loss per common share
is the same as basic net loss per common share.
The following table sets forth for the periods presented the potential common shares (prior to
consideration of the treasury stock method) excluded from the calculation of net loss per common
share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Options to purchase common stock |
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
|
7,872 |
|
Unvested restricted common stock |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,266 |
|
|
|
7,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
The fair value of restricted stock awards granted to employees is based upon the
quoted closing market price per share on the date of grant, adjusted for assumed forfeitures. For
performance-based restricted stock awards, the value of the awards is
measured when the Company determines the
achievement of such performance conditions are deemed probable. Expense is recognized over the vesting period,
commencing when the Company determines that it is probable that the awards will vest. In
May 2011, the Company granted an aggregate of 229,806 shares of
performance-based restricted stock awards to all employees, excluding the Companys leadership team. These restricted
stock awards were valued
5
at
$2.3 million on the grant date and have a term of five years. The vesting of these awards
is predicated on the Companys achievement of certain clinical development goals. For the six months ended
June 30, 2011, the Company recorded $0.3 million of stock-based compensation expense related to
these restricted stock awards.
Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present information about the Companys assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and indicate the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In
general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data
points that are observable, such as quoted prices (adjusted), interest rates and yield curves. Fair
values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points for the asset or liability,
and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows, in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
At |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
63,962 |
|
|
$ |
46,462 |
|
|
$ |
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Marketable securities (fixed income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
119,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government obligations |
|
|
102,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
26,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities (equity holdings) |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
312,881 |
|
|
$ |
46,462 |
|
|
$ |
266,419 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
At |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
59,702 |
|
|
$ |
40,686 |
|
|
$ |
19,016 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Marketable securities (fixed income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
133,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government obligations |
|
|
122,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
17,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities (equity holdings) |
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
335,007 |
|
|
$ |
40,686 |
|
|
$ |
294,321 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amounts reflected in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets for
cash, collaboration receivables, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.
Investments in Marketable Securities
The Company invests its excess cash balances in short-term and long-term marketable debt and
equity securities. The Company classifies its investments in marketable debt securities as either
held-to-maturity or available-for-sale based on facts and circumstances present at the time it
purchased the securities. At each balance sheet date presented, the Company classified all of its
investments in debt and equity securities as available-for-sale. The Company reports
available-for-sale investments at fair value at each balance sheet date and includes any unrealized
holding gains and losses (the adjustment to fair value) in stockholders equity. Realized gains and
losses are determined using the specific identification method and are included in other income. If
any adjustment to fair value reflects a decline in the value of the investment, the Company
considers all available evidence to evaluate the extent to which the decline is other than
temporary and, if so, marks the investment to market through a charge to its condensed
consolidated statements of operations. The Company did not record any impairment charges related to
its fixed income marketable securities during the current period. The Companys marketable
securities are classified as cash equivalents if the original maturity, from the date of purchase,
is 90 days or less, and as marketable securities if the original maturity, from the date of
purchase, is in excess of 90 days. The Companys cash equivalents are composed of money market
funds, U.S. government obligations and commercial paper.
The following tables summarize the Companys marketable securities at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, in thousands:
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Commercial paper (Due within 1 year) |
|
$ |
26,488 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
26,484 |
|
Corporate notes (Due within 1 year) |
|
|
87,255 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
87,334 |
|
Corporate notes (Due after 1 year through 2 years) |
|
|
32,033 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
32,019 |
|
U.S. Government obligations (Due within 1 year) |
|
|
37,013 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
37,021 |
|
U.S. Government obligations (Due after 1 year through 2 years) |
|
|
65,031 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
65,015 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
249,165 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
(371 |
) |
|
$ |
248,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Commercial paper (Due within 1 year) |
|
$ |
17,734 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
17,733 |
|
Corporate notes (Due within 1 year) |
|
|
116,385 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
116,566 |
|
Corporate notes (Due after 1 year through 2 years) |
|
|
16,767 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
16,775 |
|
U.S. Government obligations (Due within 1 year) |
|
|
24,246 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
24,233 |
|
U.S. Government obligations (Due after 1 year through 2 years) |
|
|
98,111 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
98,040 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
274,588 |
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
$ |
275,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2011 up through
the date these condensed consolidated financial statements were issued. During this period, the
Company did not have any material recognizable or nonrecognizable subsequent events.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2011, the Company adopted new authoritative guidance on revenue recognition for
multiple element arrangements. The guidance, which applies to multiple element arrangements entered
into or materially modified on or after January 1, 2011, amends the criteria for separating and
allocating consideration in a multiple element arrangement by modifying the fair value requirements
for revenue recognition and eliminating the use of the residual method. The fair value of
deliverables under the arrangement may be derived using a best estimate of selling price if
vendor specific objective evidence and third-party evidence is not available. Deliverables under
the arrangement will be separate units of accounting provided (i) a delivered item has value to the
customer on a standalone basis; and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return
relative to the delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered
probable and substantially in the control of the vendor. The Company did not enter into any
significant multiple element arrangements or materially modify any existing multiple element
arrangements during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Companys existing license and
collaboration agreements continue to be accounted for under previously issued revenue recognition
guidance for multiple element arrangements.
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard that clarifies the application of
certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosures for fair value
measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new standard
is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect that adoption of this new standard will have a
material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting
standard that eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part
of the statement of changes in stockholders equity, requires the consecutive presentation of the
statement of net income and other comprehensive income and requires an entity to present
reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive
income to net income. The amendments in this new standard do not change the items that must be
reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be
reclassified to net income nor do the amendments affect how earnings per share is calculated or
presented. This new standard is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. As this new
standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will not impact the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
2. SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS
The following table summarizes the Companys total consolidated net revenues from research
collaborators, for the periods indicated, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Roche |
|
$ |
13,994 |
|
|
$ |
13,994 |
|
|
$ |
27,988 |
|
|
$ |
27,988 |
|
Takeda |
|
|
5,493 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
10,923 |
|
Novartis |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
4,973 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
4,520 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
7,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues from research collaborators |
|
$ |
20,614 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
$ |
41,511 |
|
|
$ |
51,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platform Alliances
Roche Alliance
In July 2007, the Company and, for limited purposes, Alnylam Europe, entered into a license
and collaboration agreement (the LCA) with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Roche Basel) and
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (together with Roche Basel, Roche). Under the LCA, which became effective
in August 2007, the Company granted Roche a non-exclusive license to the Companys intellectual
property, including delivery-related intellectual property existing as of the date of the LCA, to
develop and commercialize therapeutic products that function through RNA interference (RNAi),
subject to the Companys existing contractual obligations to third parties. The license is
initially limited to four therapeutic areas, and may be expanded to include up to 18 additional
therapeutic areas, comprising substantially all other fields of human disease, as identified and
agreed upon by the parties, upon payment to the Company by Roche of an additional $50.0 million for
each additional therapeutic area, if any.
In consideration for the rights granted to Roche under the LCA, Roche paid the Company $273.5
million in upfront cash payments. In addition, in exchange for the Companys contributions under
the LCA, for each RNAi therapeutic product developed by Roche, its affiliates or sublicensees under
the LCA, the Company is entitled to receive milestone payments upon achievement of specified
development and sales events, totaling up to an aggregate of $100.0 million per therapeutic target,
together with royalty payments based on worldwide annual net sales, if any. Under the LCA, the
Company and Roche also established a discovery collaboration in October 2009 (Discovery
Collaboration), subject to the Companys existing contractual obligations to third parties.
In July 2007, the Company executed a common stock purchase agreement (the Common Stock
Purchase Agreement) with Roche Finance Ltd, an affiliate of Roche. In connection with the
execution of the LCA and the Common Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company also executed a share
purchase agreement (the Alnylam Europe Purchase Agreement) with Alnylam Europe and Roche
Beteiligungs GmbH, an affiliate of Roche (Roche Germany). Under the terms of the Alnylam Europe
Purchase Agreement, the Company sold substantially all of the non-intellectual property assets of
Alnylam Europe to Roche Germany for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million.
In summary, the Company received upfront payments totaling $331.0 million under the Roche
alliance, which include an upfront payment under the LCA of $273.5 million, $42.5 million under the
Common Stock Purchase Agreement and $15.0 million under the Alnylam Europe Purchase Agreement. The
Company initially recorded $278.2 million of these proceeds as deferred revenue in connection with
the Roche alliance.
When evaluating multiple element arrangements, the Company considers whether the components of
the arrangement represent separate units of accounting. The accounting guidance specifically
requires that the delivered components must have value to the customer on a standalone basis and
that there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered components.
Application of this standard requires subjective determinations and requires management to make
judgments about the value of each individual element and whether it is separable from the other
aspects of the contractual relationship. The Company has determined that the deliverables under
its agreements with Roche include the license, the Alnylam Europe assets and employees, the
steering committees (joint steering committee and future technology committee) and the services
under the Discovery Collaboration. The Company has determined that, pursuant to the accounting
guidance governing revenue recognition on multiple element arrangements, the license and assets of
Alnylam Europe are not separable from the undelivered services (i.e., the steering committees and
Discovery
8
Collaboration) and, accordingly the license and the services are being treated as a single
unit of accounting. When multiple deliverables are accounted for as a single unit of accounting,
the Company bases its revenue recognition pattern on the final deliverable. Under the Roche
alliance, the steering committee services and the Discovery Collaboration services are the final
deliverables and all such services will end, contractually, five years from the effective date of
the LCA.
In November 2010, Roche announced the discontinuation of certain activities in research and
early development, including its RNAi research efforts. The remaining deliverables under the LCA
currently remain in effect. Roche may assign its rights and obligations under the LCA to a third
party in connection with the sale or transfer of its entire RNAi business.
The Company is recognizing the Roche-related revenue on a straight-line basis over five years
because the Company cannot reasonably estimate the total level of effort required to complete its
service obligations under the LCA, and therefore, cannot utilize a proportional performance model.
As future substantive milestones are achieved, the Company will recognize as revenue a portion of
the milestone payment, equal to the percentage of the performance period completed when the
milestone is achieved, multiplied by the amount of the milestone payment. The Company will
recognize the remaining portion of the milestone over the remaining performance period on a
straight-line basis. The Company will continue to recognize the Roche-related revenue on a
straight-line basis over five years. If Roche terminates the LCA or assigns its rights and
obligations thereunder to a third party, at such time, the Company will reassess its deliverables
and the period over which it will complete its performance obligations under the LCA. At June 30,
2011, deferred revenue under the LCA was $65.3 million.
Takeda Alliance
In May 2008, the Company entered into a license and collaboration agreement (the Takeda
Collaboration Agreement) with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda) to pursue the
development and commercialization of RNAi therapeutics. Under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement,
the Company granted Takeda a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license to the Companys
intellectual property, including delivery-related intellectual property, controlled by the Company
as of the date of the agreement or during the five years thereafter, to develop, manufacture, use
and commercialize RNAi therapeutics, subject to the Companys existing contractual obligations to
third parties. The license initially is limited to the fields of oncology and metabolic disease and
may be expanded at Takedas option to include other therapeutic areas, subject to specified
conditions. Under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, Takeda is the Companys exclusive platform
partner in the Asian territory, as defined in the Takeda Collaboration Agreement through May 2013.
In consideration for the rights granted to Takeda under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement,
Takeda agreed to pay the Company $150.0 million in upfront and near-term technology transfer
payments. In addition, the Company has the option, exercisable until the start of Phase III
development, to opt-in under a 50-50 profit sharing agreement to the development and
commercialization in the United States of up to four Takeda licensed products, and would be
entitled to opt-in rights for two additional products for each additional field expansion, if any,
elected by Takeda under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement. In June 2008, Takeda paid the Company
an upfront payment of $100.0 million and agreed to pay an additional $50.0 million to the Company
upon achievement of specified technology transfer milestones. Of this $50.0 million, $20.0 million
was paid to the Company in October 2008, $20.0 million was paid to the Company in March 2010 and
$10.0 million was paid to the Company in March 2011 (collectively, Technology Transfer
Milestones). If Takeda elects to expand its license to additional therapeutic areas, Takeda will
be required to pay the Company $50.0 million for each of up to approximately 20 total additional
fields selected, if any, comprising substantially all other fields of human disease, as identified
and agreed upon by the parties. In addition, for each RNAi therapeutic product developed by Takeda,
its affiliates and sublicensees, the Company is entitled to receive specified development and
commercialization milestones, totaling up to $171.0 million per product, together with royalty
payments based on worldwide annual net sales, if any.
Pursuant to the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, the Company and Takeda are also collaborating
on the research of RNAi therapeutics directed to one or two disease targets agreed to by the
parties (the Research Collaboration), subject to the Companys existing contractual obligations
with third parties. Takeda also has the option, subject to certain conditions, to collaborate with
the Company on the research and development of RNAi drug delivery technology for targets agreed to
by the parties. In addition, Takeda has a right of first negotiation for the development and
commercialization of the Companys RNAi therapeutic products in the Asian territory, excluding the
Companys ALN-RSV program. In addition to the 50-50 profit sharing option, the Company has a
similar right of first negotiation to participate with Takeda in the development and
commercialization in the United States of licensed products. The collaboration is governed by a
joint technology transfer committee (the JTTC), a joint research collaboration committee (the
JRCC) and a joint delivery collaboration committee (the JDCC), each of which is comprised of an
equal number of representatives from each party.
9
The Company has determined that the deliverables under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement
include the license, the joint committees (the JTTC, JRCC and JDCC), the technology transfer
activities and the services that the Company will be obligated to perform under the Research
Collaboration. The Company has determined that, pursuant to the accounting guidance governing
revenue recognition on multiple element arrangements, the license and undelivered services (i.e.,
the joint committees and the Research Collaboration) are not separable and, accordingly, the
license and services are being treated as a single unit of accounting. When multiple deliverables
are accounted for as a single unit of accounting, the Company bases its revenue recognition pattern
on the final deliverable. Under the Takeda Collaboration Agreement, the last elements to be
delivered are the JDCC and JTTC services, each of which has a life of no more than seven years.
The Company is recognizing the upfront payment of $100.0 million and the Technology Transfer
Milestones of $50.0 million, the receipt of which the Company believed was probable at the
commencement of the collaboration, on a straight-line basis over seven years because the Company is
unable to reasonably estimate the level of effort to fulfill these obligations, primarily because
the effort required under the Research Collaboration is largely unknown, and therefore, cannot
utilize the proportional performance model. As future substantive milestones are achieved, the
Company will recognize as revenue a portion of the milestone payment equal to the percentage of the
performance period completed when the milestone is achieved, multiplied by the amount of the
milestone payment. The Company will recognize the remaining portion of the milestone over the
remaining performance period on a straight-line basis. At June 30, 2011, deferred revenue under the
Takeda Collaboration Agreement was $85.8 million.
Discovery and Development Alliances
Novartis Broad Alliance
In the second half of 2005, the Company entered into a series of transactions with Novartis
Pharma AG and its affiliate, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc. (together,
Novartis), which included a stock purchase agreement, an investor rights agreement (the Investor
Rights Agreement), and a research collaboration and license agreement (the Collaboration and
License Agreement). The Collaboration and License Agreement had an initial research term of three
years, with an option for two additional one-year extensions at the election of Novartis. Novartis
elected to extend the term through October 2010, the fifth and final planned year. In October 2010,
the research program under the Collaboration and License Agreement was substantially completed in
accordance with the terms of the Collaboration and License Agreement, subject to certain surviving
rights and obligations of the parties.
The Investor Rights Agreement provides Novartis with the right generally to maintain its
ownership percentage in the Company until the earlier of any sale by Novartis of shares of the
Companys common stock and the expiration or termination of the Collaboration and License
Agreement, subject to certain exceptions. At June 30, 2011, Novartis owned 13.1% of the Companys
outstanding common stock.
In consideration for the rights granted to Novartis under the Collaboration and License
Agreement, Novartis made an upfront payment of $10.0 million to the Company in October 2005, partly
to reimburse prior costs incurred by the Company to develop in vivo RNAi technology. The Company
also received research funding and development milestone payments from Novartis.
In September 2010, Novartis exercised its right under the Collaboration and License Agreement
to select 31 designated gene targets, for which Novartis has exclusive rights to discover, develop
and commercialize RNAi therapeutic products using the Companys intellectual property and
technology, including delivery-related intellectual property and related technology. Under the
terms of the Collaboration and License Agreement, for any RNAi therapeutic products Novartis
develops against these targets, the Company is entitled to receive milestone payments upon
achievement of certain specified development and annual net sales events, up to an aggregate of
$75.0 million per therapeutic product, as well as royalties on annual net sales of any such
product. Novartis right of first offer with respect to an exclusive license for additional
targets has terminated. In September 2010, Novartis declined to exercise its non-exclusive option
to integrate into its operations the Companys fundamental and chemistry intellectual property
under the terms of the Collaboration and License Agreement. If Novartis had elected to exercise the
integration option, Novartis would have been required to make additional payments to the Company
totaling $100.0 million.
The Company believes the estimated period of performance under the Collaboration and License
Agreement is ten years, which includes the three-year initial term of the agreement, two one-year
extensions elected by Novartis and limited support as part of a technology transfer until 2015, the
fifth anniversary of the completion of the research term under the Collaboration and License
Agreement. The Company continues to use an expected term of ten years in its proportional
performance model. The Company reevaluates the expected term when new information is known that
could affect the Companys estimate. In the event the Companys period of performance is different
than estimated, the Company will adjust the amount of revenue recognized on a prospective basis.
10
At June 30, 2011, deferred revenue under the Novartis Collaboration and License Agreement was
$0.3 million.
Product Alliances
Kyowa Hakko Kirin Alliance
In June 2008, the Company entered into a license and collaboration agreement (the Kyowa Hakko
Kirin Agreement) with Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. (Kyowa Hakko Kirin). Under the Kyowa Hakko
Kirin Agreement, the Company granted Kyowa Hakko Kirin an exclusive license to its intellectual
property in Japan and other markets in Asia (the Licensed Territory) for the development and
commercialization of an RNAi therapeutic for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
infection. The Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement covers ALN-RSV01, as well as additional RSV-specific
RNAi therapeutic compounds that comprise the ALN-RSV program (Additional Compounds). The Company
retains all development and commercialization rights worldwide outside of the Licensed Territory,
subject to its agreement with Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cubist) described below.
Under the terms of the Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement, in June 2008, Kyowa Hakko Kirin paid the
Company an upfront cash payment of $15.0 million. In addition, Kyowa Hakko Kirin is required to
make payments to the Company upon achievement of specified development and sales milestones
totaling up to $78.0 million, and royalty payments based on annual net sales, if any, of RNAi
therapeutics for the treatment of RSV by Kyowa Hakko Kirin, its affiliates and sublicensees in the
Licensed Territory.
The collaboration between Kyowa Hakko Kirin and the Company is governed by a joint steering
committee that is comprised of an equal number of representatives from each party. Under the
agreement, Kyowa Hakko Kirin is establishing a development plan for the ALN-RSV program relating to
the development activities to be undertaken in the Licensed Territory, with the initial focus on
Japan. Kyowa Hakko Kirin is responsible, at its expense, for all development activities under the
development plan that are reasonably necessary for the regulatory approval and commercialization of
an RNAi therapeutic for the treatment of RSV in Japan and the rest of the Licensed Territory. The
Company is responsible for supply of the product to Kyowa Hakko Kirin under a supply agreement
unless Kyowa Hakko Kirin elects, prior to the first commercial sale of the product in the Licensed
Territory, to manufacture the product itself or arrange for a third party to manufacture the
product.
The Company has determined that the deliverables under the Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement include
the license, the joint steering committee, the manufacturing services and any Additional Compounds.
The Company has determined that, pursuant to the accounting guidance governing revenue recognition
on multiple element arrangements, the individual deliverables are not separable and, accordingly,
must be accounted for as a single unit of accounting. When multiple deliverables are accounted for
as a single unit of accounting, the Company bases its revenue recognition pattern on the final
deliverable. The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate its period of performance
under the Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement, as it is unable to estimate the timeline of its deliverables
related to the fixed-price option granted to Kyowa Hakko Kirin for any Additional Compounds. The
Company is deferring all revenue under the Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement until it is able to
reasonably estimate its period of performance. The Company will continue to reassess whether it can
reasonably estimate the period of performance to fulfill its obligations under the Kyowa Hakko
Kirin Agreement. At June 30, 2011, deferred revenue under the Kyowa Hakko Kirin Agreement was $15.5
million.
Cubist Alliance
In January 2009, the Company entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Cubist
(the Cubist Agreement) to develop and commercialize therapeutic products (Licensed Products)
based on certain of the Companys RNAi technology for the treatment of RSV infection. Licensed
Products initially included ALN-RSV01, as well as several other second-generation RNAi-based RSV
inhibitors. In November 2009, the Company and Cubist entered into an amendment to the Cubist
Agreement (the Amendment), which provides that the Company and Cubist would focus their
collaboration and joint development efforts on ALN-RSV02, a second-generation compound, intended
for use in pediatric patients. Consistent with the original Cubist Agreement, the Company and
Cubist were each responsible for one-half of the related development costs for ALN-RSV02. Pursuant
to the terms of the Amendment, the Company is continuing to develop ALN-RSV01 for adult transplant
patients at its sole discretion and expense. Cubist has the right to opt into collaborating with
the Company on ALN-RSV01 in the future, which right may be exercised for a specified period of time
following the completion of the Companys Phase IIb trial of ALN-RSV01, subject to the payment by
Cubist of an opt-in fee representing reimbursement of an agreed upon percentage of certain of the
Companys development expenses for ALN-RSV01. In December 2010, the Company and Cubist jointly made
a portfolio decision to put the development of ALN-RSV02 on hold.
In consideration for the rights granted to Cubist under the Cubist Agreement, in January 2009,
Cubist paid the Company an
11
upfront cash payment of $20.0 million. Cubist is also obligated under the Cubist Agreement to pay
the Company milestone payments, totaling up to an aggregate of $82.5 million, and has the right to
convert the North American co-development and profit sharing arrangement into a royalty-bearing
license.
The Company has determined that the deliverables under the Cubist Agreement include the
licenses, technology transfer related to the ALN-RSV program, the joint steering committee and the
development and manufacturing services that the Company is obligated to perform during the
development period. The Company also has determined that, pursuant to the accounting guidance
governing revenue recognition on multiple element arrangements, the licenses and undelivered
services are not separable and, accordingly, the licenses and services are being treated as a
single unit of accounting. When multiple deliverables are accounted for as a single unit of
accounting, the Company bases its revenue recognition pattern on the final deliverable. Under the
Cubist Agreement, the last element to be delivered is the development and manufacturing services,
which have an expected life of approximately eight years.
The Company is recognizing the upfront payment of $20.0 million on a straight-line basis over
approximately eight years because the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the level of effort
to fulfill its performance obligations, and therefore, cannot utilize a proportional performance
model. As future substantive milestones are achieved, the Company will recognize as revenue a
portion of the milestone payment, equal to the percentage of the performance period completed when
the milestone is achieved, multiplied by the amount of the milestone payment. The Company will
recognize the remaining portion of the milestone over the remaining performance period on a
straight-line basis. At June 30, 2011, deferred revenue under the Cubist Agreement was $13.8
million.
Under the terms of the Cubist Agreement, the Company and Cubist share responsibility for
developing Licensed Products in North America and each bears one-half of the related development
costs, provided that under the terms of the Amendment, the Company is funding the advancement of
ALN-RSV01 for adult lung transplant patients and Cubist retains an opt-in right. For revenue
generating arrangements that involve cost sharing between the parties, the Company presents the
results of activities for which it acts as the principal on a gross basis and reports any payments
received from, or made to, other collaborators based on other applicable GAAP or, in the absence of
other applicable GAAP, analogy to authoritative accounting literature or a reasonable, rational and
consistently applied accounting policy election. As the Company is not considered the principal
under the Cubist Agreement, the Company records any amounts due from Cubist as a reduction of
research and development expense.
3. INCOME TAXES
The Company expects to generate U.S. taxable losses during 2011 and has recorded no income tax
provision for the three or six months ended June 30, 2011. During each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a
benefit from income taxes of $0.2 million.
During 2009 and 2008, the Company utilized certain tax attributes, including net operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards as a result of the recognition of revenue for certain proceeds
received from strategic alliances. However, the Company also generated a deferred tax asset related
to the recognition of this revenue for tax purposes and recorded a net deferred tax asset to the
extent it was more likely than not that the asset would be realized. During 2010, the Company
generated sufficient net operating losses to carry back to 2009 and 2008 to obtain a refund of
taxes paid in those years, resulting in a realization of its net deferred tax asset. As a result,
during 2010, the Company reclassified $10.7 million of its deferred tax asset to income taxes
receivable. The Company received this income tax refund during the three months ended March 31,
2011.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of
$27.5 million and $101.6 million, respectively, to reduce future taxable income that will expire at
various dates through 2030. Ownership changes, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, including
those resulting from the issuance of common stock in connection with the Companys public
offerings, may limit the amount of net operating loss that can be utilized to offset future taxable
income or tax liability. The Company has determined that there is no limitation on the utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards in accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.
In July 2011, the Internal Revenue Service completed its audits of the Companys 2008 and 2009 tax
years. The Company did not record any tax expense related to these audits.
The Company continues to recognize fully its tax benefits which are offset by a valuation
allowance to the extent that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $0.1 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits
that, if recognized, would favorably impact the Companys effective income tax rate in future
periods.
12
4. REGULUS
In September 2007, the Company and Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Isis) established Regulus, a
company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of microRNA therapeutics, a
potential new class of drugs to treat the pathways of human disease. Regulus, which initially was
established as a limited liability company, converted to a C corporation in January 2009 and
changed its name to Regulus Therapeutics Inc.
In consideration for the Companys and Isis initial interests in Regulus, each party granted
Regulus exclusive licenses to its intellectual property for certain microRNA therapeutic
applications as well as certain patents in the microRNA field. In addition, the Company made an
initial cash contribution to Regulus of $10.0 million, resulting in the Company and Isis making
approximately equal aggregate initial capital contributions to Regulus. In March 2009, the Company
and Isis each purchased $10.0 million of Series A preferred stock of Regulus. In October 2010, in
connection with its strategic alliance with Regulus formed in June 2010, Sanofi made a $10.0
million equity investment in Regulus. As a result of this investment, the Company recognized a gain
of $4.4 million due to the increase in valuation of Regulus. This amount was recorded as other
income in the Companys consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, the Company, Isis and Sanofi owned approximately 45%, 46% and 9%, respectively,
of Regulus. Regulus continues to operate as an independent company with a separate board of
directors, scientific advisory board and management team, some of whom have options to purchase
common stock of Regulus. Members of the board of directors of Regulus who are the Companys
employees or Isis employees are not eligible to receive options to purchase Regulus common stock.
The Company has reviewed the consolidation guidance that defines a variable interest entity
(VIE) and concluded that Regulus currently qualifies as a VIE. The Company does not consolidate
Regulus as the Company lacks the power to direct the activities that could significantly impact the
economic success of this entity. At June 30, 2011, the total carrying value of the Companys
investment in joint venture (Regulus Therapeutics Inc.) in its condensed consolidated balance
sheets was $1.8 million under the equity method. The Companys maximum exposure to loss related to
this VIE is limited to the carrying value of the Companys investment, as well the portion of
Regulus debt, including accrued interest, guaranteed by the Company which was $5.4 million at June
30, 2011.
The Company accounts for its investment in Regulus using the equity method of accounting.
Summary results of Regulus operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
and balance sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented in the tables below, in
thousands (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
3,308 |
|
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
6,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
5,446 |
|
|
|
8,685 |
|
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
12,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
(7,876 |
) |
|
|
(4,288 |
) |
|
|
(10,944 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,254 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,930 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
|
$ |
42,616 |
|
|
$ |
54,789 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
29,887 |
|
|
|
40,446 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
47,546 |
|
|
|
59,703 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
11,265 |
|
|
|
11,270 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
3,881 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
13
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
Tekmira Litigation
On March 16, 2011, Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. filed
a civil complaint in the Business Litigation Section of the Suffolk County Superior Court, in
Boston, Massachusetts against the Company and on June 3, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint adding AlCana Technologies, Inc. (AlCana), a research collaborator of the Company, as a
defendant. The amended complaint alleges misappropriation of the plaintiffs confidential and
proprietary information and trade secrets, civil conspiracy, and tortious interference with
contractual relationships by the Company and AlCana, and unjust enrichment, contractual breach,
breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition, false
advertising, and unfair and deceptive acts and practices by the Company, and seeks injunctive
relief and unspecified damages and other relief. On April 6, 2011, the Company timely served and
filed an answer to the plaintiffs original complaint denying the plaintiffs claims in this
action, together with counterclaims against the plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, the Company timely
served and filed an answer to the plaintiffs amended complaint denying the plaintiffs claims and
counterclaims against the plaintiffs asserting breach of contract, defamation, breach of covenant
not to sue, breach of patent prosecution and non-use provisions, misappropriation of confidential
and proprietary information and trade secrets, unjust enrichment, breach of the implied covenant of
good faith and fair dealing, as well as violations of Massachusetts statutes. The Company is
seeking the dismissal of plaintiffs claims and judgment in its favor, as well as damages and
equitable relief.
University of Utah Litigation
On March 22, 2011, The University of Utah (the University) filed a civil complaint in the
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the Company, Max Planck
Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V. and Max Planck Innovation GmbH (together, Max
Planck), the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (Whitehead), the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) and the University of Massachusetts (UMass), claiming a professor
at the University is the sole inventor or, in the alternative, a joint inventor, of the Tuschl
patents. The University did not serve the original complaint on the Company or the other
defendants. On July 6, 2011, the University filed an amended complaint alleging substantially the
same claims against the Company, Max Planck, Whitehead, MIT and UMass. The amended complaint was
served on the Company on July 14, 2011. The University is seeking changes to the inventorship of
the Tuschl patents, unspecified damages and other relief.
Although the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to each of the claims in the
lawsuits described above and intends to fully defend itself in these matters, litigation is subject
to inherent uncertainty and a court could ultimately rule against the Company in one or both of
these matters. In addition, the defense of litigation and related matters are costly and may divert
the attention of the Companys management and other resources that would otherwise be engaged in
running the Companys business. The Company has not recorded an estimated liability associated with
the legal proceedings described above due in each case to the uncertainties related to both the
likelihood and the amount of any potential loss.
Tuschl Settlement
In
March 2011, the Company, Max Planck, Whitehead and UMass entered into
a global settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement) resolving their ongoing litigation regarding
the Tuschl patents. MIT, formerly a party to the litigation, also agreed to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
The
litigation was initiated in June 2009 and scheduled for trial in March 2011 in the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, and related to, among other things, the prosecution of the Tuschl I and Tuschl II patent
applications. In the field of RNAi therapeutics, the Company is the exclusive licensee of the Tuschl I patent
applications from Max Planck, MIT and Whitehead, and of the Tuschl II patent applications from Max Planck.
The terms of the Settlement Agreement included mutual releases and dismissal with prejudice of all claims and
counterclaims in the litigation between the parties.
As
part of the Settlement Agreement, Max Planck, Whitehead, UMass and MIT agreed that future prosecution of the Tuschl I and
Tuschl II patent families in the United States should be coordinated and led by a single party. Max Planck will assume
that role, in addition to their ongoing leadership in the continued prosecution of the Tuschl II patent family outside
the United States. UMass will lead future prosecution of the Tuschl I patent family outside the United States.
In addition, under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company granted UMass the right to sublicense the U.S.
Tuschl II patent family to Merck & Co., Inc., subject to certain third-party obligations of the Company and other
limitations, in exchange for a share of certain future sublicense income.
The
Company incurred costs of $3.3 million and $3.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, in connection with this dispute. These costs were charged to general and administrative expense.
The Company does not expect to incur any additional significant expenses related to this dispute.
6. RESTRUCTURING
In September 2010, as a result of the planned completion of the fifth and final year of the
research program under the Novartis Collaboration and License Agreement and the Companys reduced
need for service-based collaboration resources, the Companys Board of Directors approved and the
Company effected a corporate restructuring to focus the Companys resources on its most promising
programs and significantly reduce its cost structure. The corporate restructuring included
implementing a reduction of the Companys overall workforce by approximately 25%.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $2.2 million of
restructuring-related costs in operating expenses, including employee severance, benefits and
related costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not record any additional
restructuring related costs.
The following table summarizes the components of the Companys restructuring expenses recorded
in operating expenses and in current liabilities, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Charges |
|
|
(Reversals) or |
|
|
Amounts
Paid
Through |
|
|
Amounts
Accrued at |
|
|
|
and Amounts |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
to Charges |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Employee severance, benefits and related costs |
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,193 |
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The following table summarizes the components of the Companys restructuring activities
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Accrued |
|
|
(Reversals) or |
|
|
Amounts
Paid
Through |
|
|
Amounts
Accrued at |
|
|
|
at December 31, |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
to Charges |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Employee severance, benefits and related costs |
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely
historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Without limiting the foregoing, the
words may, will, should, could, expects, plans, intends, anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts, potential, continue, target, goal and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements
contain these words. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
are based on information available to us up to, and including, the date of this document, and we
assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain important factors,
including those set forth below under this Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should carefully review those factors and also carefully
review the risks outlined in other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapeutics based on RNA interference, or
RNAi. RNAi is a naturally occurring biological pathway within cells for selectively silencing and
regulating the expression of specific genes. Since many diseases are caused by the inappropriate
activity of specific genes, the ability to silence genes selectively through RNAi could provide a
new way to treat a wide range of human diseases. We believe that drugs that work through RNAi have
the potential to become a broad new class of drugs, like small molecule, protein and antibody
drugs. Using our intellectual property and the expertise we have built in RNAi, we are developing a
set of biological and chemical methods and know-how that we apply in a systematic way to develop
RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of a variety of diseases.
Our core product strategy, which we refer to as Alnylam 5x15, is focused on the development
and commercialization of innovative RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of genetically defined
diseases. Under our core product strategy, we expect to progress five RNAi therapeutic programs
into advanced stages of clinical development by the end of 2015. As part of this strategy, our goal
is to develop product candidates with the following shared characteristics: a genetically defined
target and disease; the potential to have a significant impact in high unmet need patient
populations; the ability to leverage our existing RNAi delivery platform; the opportunity to
monitor an early biomarker in Phase I clinical trials for human proof of concept; and the existence
of clinically relevant endpoints for the filing of a new drug application, or NDA, with a focused
patient database and possible accelerated paths for commercialization. We intend to commercialize
products arising from this core product strategy on our own in the United States and potentially
certain other countries, and we intend to enter into alliances to develop and commercialize any
such products in other global territories. We are currently advancing three core programs in
clinical or pre-clinical development: ALN-TTR for the treatment of transthyretin-mediated
amyloidosis, or ATTR; ALN-PCS for the treatment of severe hypercholesterolemia; and ALN-HPN for the
treatment of refractory anemia. As part of our core product strategy, we also expect to designate
and start pre-clinical development of two additional RNAi therapeutic candidates targeting
genetically defined diseases by the end of 2011.
While focusing our efforts on our core product strategy, we also intend to continue to advance
additional development programs through existing or future alliances. We have three partner-based
programs in clinical or pre-clinical development, including ALN-RSV01 for the treatment of
respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, infection, ALN-VSP for the treatment of liver cancers and
ALN-HTT for the treatment of Huntingtons disease, or HD.
Our most advanced core product development program, ALN-TTR, targets the transthyretin, or
TTR, gene, for the treatment of ATTR, a hereditary, systemic disease associated with severe
morbidity and mortality caused by a mutation in the TTR gene that leads to the extracellular
deposition of amyloid fibrils. In July 2010, we initiated a Phase I clinical trial for ALN-TTR01, a
systemically delivered RNAi therapeutic. ALN-TTR01 employs a first-generation lipid nanoparticle,
or LNP, formulation. The Phase I clinical trial for ALN-TTR01 is being conducted in Portugal,
Sweden, the United Kingdom and France, and is a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled dose
escalation study. As a result of favorable safety data to date, we received regulatory approval to
extend this Phase I clinical trial with additional dose cohorts up to 1.0 mg/kg, increasing
enrollment from 28 to up to 36 patients. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and
tolerability of a single dose of intravenous ALN-TTR01. Secondary objectives include
characterization of plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of ALN-TTR01 and assessment of
pharmacodynamic activity based on measurements of circulating TTR serum levels. In January 2011,
The Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products of the European
16
Medicines Agency adopted a positive opinion for ALN-TTR01 designation as an orphan medicinal
product for the treatment of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy, one of the predominant
forms of ATTR. In April 2011, the European Commission officially designated ALN-TTR01 as an orphan
drug. In parallel with the development of ALN-TTR01, we are also advancing ALN-TTR02 utilizing a
proprietary second-generation LNP formulation.
Our second core product development program is ALN-PCS. ALN-PCS employs a proprietary
second-generation LNP formulation, specifically using the MC3 lipid. We are developing ALN-PCS, a
systemically delivered RNAi therapeutic, for the treatment of severe hypercholesterolemia. ALN-PCS
targets a gene called proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, or PCSK9, which is involved in
the regulation of LDL receptor levels on hepatocytes and the metabolism of LDL cholesterol, or
LDL-c, which is also commonly referred to as bad cholesterol. In July 2011, we filed a clinical
trial application, or CTA, with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA,
to initiate a Phase I clinical trial for ALN-PCS in the United Kingdom. Upon receiving clearance
of the CTA, we plan to initiate the Phase I clinical trial as a randomized, single-blind,
placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study, enrolling approximately 32 healthy volunteer
subjects with elevated baseline LDLc. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety
and tolerability of a single dose of ALN-PCS, with patients being enrolled into five sequential
cohorts of increasing doses ranging from 0.015 to 0.25 mg/kg. Secondary objectives include
characterization of plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of ALN-PCS, and assessment of pharmacodynamic
effects of the drug on plasma PCSK9 protein and LDLc levels measured from serial blood samples
prior to and following dosing. Pre-clinical studies with ALN-PCS demonstrated specific silencing
of PCSK9 messenger RNA, or mRNA, in the liver, and plasma PCSK9 protein levels of up to 90%, with
an ED50 (the dose that provides a 50% silencing effect) of approximately 0.06 mg/kg for both mRNA
and protein reduction. These studies have also demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in levels
of LDL-c, which result is rapidly achieved and durable, lasting for weeks after a single dose.
We
have designated ALN-HPN as our third core product development program. ALN-HPN is a
systemically delivered RNAi therapeutic targeting hepcidin, a genetically validated gene in iron
homeostasis, for the treatment of refractory anemia. Anemia of chronic disease, or ACD, occurs in
patients with end-stage renal disease, cancer and chronic inflammatory disease. ACD patients who
are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron define a condition of
refractory anemia for which there is substantial unmet need. Pre-clinical studies with a small
interfering RNA, or siRNA, targeting hepcidin demonstrated the ability to silence the gene and
increase serum iron levels. ALN-HPN also employs a second-generation LNP formulation.
As noted above, while focusing our efforts on our core product strategy, we also intend to
continue to advance additional partner-based development programs, including ALN-RSV, ALN-VSP and
ALN-HTT, through existing or future alliances.
In February 2010, we initiated a multi-center, global, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled Phase IIb clinical trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy as well as safety of
aerosolized ALN-RSV01 in adult lung transplant patients naturally infected with RSV. Patients are
being randomized in a one-to-one drug to placebo ratio. The primary endpoint of this clinical trial
is a reduction in the incidence of new or progressive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, or BOS, a
potentially life-threatening complication in lung transplant
patients. During 2011, we amended the
protocol of this clinical trial to perform an interim analysis, blinded to us and investigators,
which could expand enrollment from 76 to up to 120 patients. The interim analysis will be
performed when 75% of patients are evaluable for the BOS endpoint at six months. We have formed
collaborations with Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Cubist, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., or
Kyowa Hakko Kirin, for the development and commercialization of RNAi products for the treatment of
RSV. Under our agreement with Cubist, we are developing ALN-RSV01 for adult transplant patients at
our sole discretion and expense and Cubist has the right to opt into collaborating with us on
ALN-RSV01 in the future. In December 2010, we and Cubist jointly made a portfolio decision to put
the development of ALN-RSV02, a second-generation compound for the pediatric population, on hold.
In
August 2011, we announced that we have completed a Phase I clinical trial for ALN-VSP, which
was our first systemically delivered RNAi therapeutic to enter clinical development. ALN-VSP is
comprised of two siRNAs, one targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF, and the other
targeting kinesin spindle protein, or KSP, and employs a first-generation LNP formulation. We are
developing ALN-VSP for the treatment of liver cancers, including both primary and secondary liver
cancers. This Phase I clinical trial was a multi-center, open label, dose escalation study to
evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous ALN-VSP in
patients with advanced solid tumors with liver involvement. We completed enrollment in this
clinical trial during the first quarter of 2011 and reported study results in June 2011. ALN-VSP
was administered to 41 patients at doses ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg and was generally well
tolerated. As of July 2011, five patients with disease control were continuing to receive therapy
in an extension study. Results from pharmacodynamic measurements provide evidence of biological
activity, and biopsy data demonstrate both tissue levels of ALN-VSP and also human proof-of-concept
for an RNAi mechanism of action. We intend to partner our ALN-VSP program prior to initiating a
Phase II clinical trial.
17
A third partner-based development program is ALN-HTT, an RNAi therapeutic candidate targeting
the huntingtin gene, for the treatment of HD, which we are developing in collaboration with
Medtronic, Inc., or Medtronic. In November 2010, we and Medtronic entered into an agreement with
CHDI Foundation, Inc., or CHDI, under which CHDI has agreed to initially fund approximately 50% of
the costs of this program up to the point at which an investigational new drug application, or IND,
can be filed with the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or a comparable foreign
regulatory filing can be made.
We also continue to work internally and with third-party collaborators to develop new
technologies to deliver our RNAi therapeutics both directly to specific sites of disease, and
systemically by intravenous or subcutaneous administration. We have numerous RNAi therapeutic
delivery collaborations and intend to continue to collaborate with government, academic and
corporate third parties to evaluate different delivery options.
We believe that the strength of our intellectual property portfolio relating to the
development and commercialization of siRNAs as therapeutics provides us a leading position with
respect to this therapeutic modality. This includes ownership of, or exclusive rights to, issued
patents and pending patent applications claiming fundamental features of siRNAs and RNAi
therapeutics as well as those claiming crucial chemical modifications and promising delivery
technologies. We believe that no other company possesses a portfolio of such broad and exclusive
rights to the patents and patent applications required for the commercialization of RNAi
therapeutics. Given the importance of our intellectual property portfolio to our business
operations, we intend to vigorously enforce our rights and defend against challenges that have
arisen or may arise in this area.
In addition, our expertise in RNAi therapeutics and broad intellectual property estate have
allowed us to form alliances with leading companies, including Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Isis,
Medtronic, Novartis Pharma AG, or Novartis, Biogen Idec Inc., or Biogen Idec, F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Ltd, or Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, or Takeda, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Cubist. We
have also entered into contracts with government agencies, including the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or NIAID, a component of the National Institutes of Health, or
NIH. We have established collaborations with and, in some instances, received funding from major
medical and disease associations, including CHDI. Finally, to further enable the field and monetize
our intellectual property rights, we also grant licenses to biotechnology companies for the
development and commercialization of RNAi therapeutics for specified targets in which we have no
direct strategic interest under our InterfeRxtm program, and to research companies that
commercialize RNAi reagents or services under our research product licenses.
We also seek to form or advance new ventures and opportunities in areas outside our primary
focus on RNAi therapeutics. For example, we have presented data regarding the application of RNAi
technology to improve the manufacturing processes for biologics, including recombinant proteins and
monoclonal antibodies. We are advancing these applications of RNAi technology in an internal effort
referred to as Alnylam Biotherapeutics. We have formed, and intend to form additional,
collaborations through this effort with third-party biopharmaceutical companies. Additionally, in
2007, we and Isis established Regulus Therapeutics Inc., or Regulus, a company focused on the
discovery, development and commercialization of microRNA therapeutics. Because microRNAs are
believed to regulate whole networks of genes that can be involved in discrete disease processes,
microRNA therapeutics represent a possible new approach to target the pathways of human disease.
Regulus has formed collaborations with GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, and Sanofi to advance its efforts.
Given the broad applications for RNAi technology, in addition to our efforts on Alnylam
Biotherapeutics and Regulus, we believe new ventures and opportunities will be available to us.
To
date, a substantial portion of our total net revenues has been derived from collaboration
revenues from strategic alliances with Roche, Takeda, Cubist and Novartis, and from the United
States government in connection with our development of treatments for hemorrhagic fever viruses,
including Ebola. We expect our revenues to continue to be derived primarily from existing
alliances, including those with Roche and Takeda, new strategic alliances, government and
foundation funding and license fee revenues.
We have incurred significant losses since we commenced operations in 2002 and expect such
losses to continue for the foreseeable future. Historically, we have generated losses principally
from costs associated with research and development activities, acquiring, filing and expanding
intellectual property rights and general administrative costs. As a result of planned expenditures
for research and development activities relating to our drug development programs, including the
development of drug delivery technologies and clinical trial costs, extension of the capabilities
of our technology platform, including through business initiatives, continued management and growth
of our patent portfolio, collaborations and general corporate activities, we expect to incur
additional operating losses for the foreseeable future.
Although we currently have programs focused on a number of therapeutic areas, we are unable to
predict when, if ever, we will successfully develop or be able to commence sales of any product.
Our sources of potential funding for the next several years are
18
expected to be derived primarily from new and existing strategic alliances, which may include
license and other fees, funded research and development and milestone payments, government and
foundation funding, and proceeds from the sale of equity or debt. In July 2011, we filed a shelf
registration statement with the SEC for an indeterminate number of shares of common stock and/or
other securities, up to an aggregate of $150 million, for future issuance.
We anticipate that our operating results will fluctuate for the foreseeable future and,
therefore, period-to-period comparisons should not be relied upon as predictive of the results of
future periods.
Research and Development
Since our inception, we have focused on drug discovery and development programs. Research and
development expenses represent a substantial percentage of our total operating expenses. Under our
core product strategy, we expect to progress five RNAi therapeutic programs into advanced stages of
clinical development by the end of 2015. While focusing our efforts on our core product strategy,
we also intend to continue to advance additional partner-based development programs through
existing or future alliances.
In addition, we continue to work internally and with third-party collaborators to develop new
technologies to deliver our RNAi therapeutics both directly to specific sites of disease, and
systemically by intravenous or subcutaneous administration.
There is a risk that any drug discovery or development program may not produce revenue for a
variety of reasons, including the possibility that we will not be able to adequately demonstrate
the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. Moreover, there are uncertainties specific to any
new field of drug discovery, including RNAi. The successful development of any product candidate we
develop is highly uncertain. Due to the numerous risks associated with developing drugs, we cannot
reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts necessary to
complete the development of, or the period, if any, in which material net cash inflows will
commence from, any potential product candidate. These risks include the uncertainty of:
|
|
|
our ability to discover new product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to progress product candidates into pre-clinical and clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
the scope, rate of progress and cost of our pre-clinical trials and other
research and development activities, including those related to developing safe and
effective ways of delivering siRNAs into cells and tissues; |
|
|
|
|
the scope, rate of progress and cost of any clinical trials we commence; |
|
|
|
|
clinical trial results; |
|
|
|
|
the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other
intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
the terms, timing and success of any collaboration, licensing and other arrangements that we
may establish; |
|
|
|
|
the cost, timing and success of regulatory filings and approvals or potential
changes in regulations that govern our industry or the way in which they are interpreted
or enforced; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing sufficient sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing sufficient clinical and commercial supplies
for any product candidates and products that we may develop; |
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with legal activities, including litigation, arising in the
course of our business activities and our ability to prevail in any such legal disputes;
and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of competing technological and market developments. |
Any failure to complete any stage of the development of any potential products in a timely
manner could have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position and liquidity. A
discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties associated with completing our projects on
schedule, or at all, and the potential consequences of failing to do so, are set forth in Part II,
Item 1A below
under the heading Risk Factors.
19
Strategic Alliances
A significant component of our business plan is to enter into strategic alliances and
collaborations with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, research
foundations and others, as appropriate, to gain access to funding, capabilities, technical
resources and intellectual property to further our development efforts and to generate revenues. We
also seek to form or advance new ventures and opportunities in areas outside our primary focus on
RNAi therapeutics.
To generate revenues from our intellectual property rights, we also grant licenses to
biotechnology companies under our InterfeRx program for the development and commercialization of
RNAi therapeutics for specified targets in which we have no direct strategic interest. We also
license key aspects of our intellectual property to companies active in the research products and
services market, which includes the manufacture and sale of reagents. Our InterfeRx and research
product licenses aim to generate modest near-term revenues that we can re-invest in the development
of our proprietary RNAi therapeutics pipeline. At June 30, 2011, we had granted such licenses, on
both an exclusive and non-exclusive basis, to approximately 20 companies.
Since delivery of RNAi therapeutics remains a major objective of our research activities, we
also look to form collaboration and licensing arrangements with other companies and academic
institutions to gain access to delivery technologies. For example, we have entered into agreements
with Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation, or Tekmira, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or
MIT, The University of British Columbia, or UBC, and AlCana Technologies, Inc., or AlCana, among
others, to focus on various delivery strategies. We have also entered into license agreements with
Isis, Max Planck Innovation GmbH (formerly known as Garching Innovation GmbH), or Max Planck
Innovation, Tekmira, MIT, Cancer Research Technology Limited, or CRT, Whitehead Institute for
Biomedical Research, or Whitehead, Stanford University, or Stanford, The University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, or UTSW, as well as a number of other entities, to obtain rights to
intellectual property in the field of RNAi.
Finally, we seek funding for the development of our proprietary RNAi therapeutics pipeline
from the government and foundations. For example, in 2006, the NIAID awarded us a contract to
advance the development of a broad spectrum RNAi anti-viral therapeutic against hemorrhagic fever
virus, including the Ebola virus, which contract ended in December 2010.
UBC/AlCana Delivery Collaboration. Our research agreement with UBC and AlCana entered into in
July 2009 is focused on the discovery of novel lipids, such as the MC3 lipid, employed in
second-generation LNP formulations for the systemic delivery of RNAi therapeutics. Pursuant to the
terms of the research agreement, we were funding collaborative research over an initial two-year
period, and recently exercised our right to extend the collaborative research and our funding for a
third year, through July 2012. The collaborative research is being conducted by our scientists,
together with scientists at UBC and AlCana.
Under the research agreement, we have exclusive rights to all new inventions relating to the
delivery of oligonucleotides and other nucleic acid constructs, as well as sole rights to
sublicense any resulting intellectual property to our current and future collaborators. UBC and
AlCana are eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $1.3 million in milestone payments from us for
each licensed product (as defined in the research agreement) directed to a particular target (as
defined in the research agreement), together with single-digit royalty payments on annual product
sales.
Concurrent with the execution of the research agreement, we also entered into a supplemental
agreement with Tekmira, Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tekmira, or
Protiva, UBC and AlCana, which contains additional terms regarding the intellectual property rights
arising out of the research agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the supplemental agreement, each
of Tekmira and Protiva has the right to use new inventions under the research agreement for its own
RNAi therapeutic programs that are licensed under our InterfeRx program and would be required to
pay milestones and royalties to UBC and AlCana in connection with such use.
Pursuant to the terms of the supplemental agreement, each of Tekmira and Protiva waived all
prohibitions and restrictions on certain former Tekmira employees who are now working at UBC and
AlCana in connection with their performance of the collaborative research under the research
agreement and granted us, AlCana, UBC and such former Tekmira employees a covenant not to sue for
any cause of action relating to such activities that arose out of their former employment with
Tekmira.
The subject matter of these agreements is the subject of ongoing litigation between Tekmira
and Protiva, on the one hand, and us and AlCana, on the other hand, a description of which is set
forth below under Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings.
Takeda Alliance. Under our collaboration agreement with Takeda, Takeda agreed to pay us $50.0
million upon achievement of specified technology transfer milestones. Of this $50.0 million, $20.0
million was paid to us in October 2008, $20.0 million was paid to us in March 2010 and the final
$10.0 million was paid to us in March 2011.
20
Alnylam Biotherapeutics
Since 2009, we have advanced our efforts regarding the application of RNAi technologies to
improve the manufacturing processes for biologics, including recombinant proteins and monoclonal
antibodies. These applications of RNAi technology, which we are advancing in an internal effort
referred to as Alnylam Biotherapeutics, have the potential to create new business opportunities. In
particular, we are advancing RNAi technologies to improve the quantity and quality of biologics
manufacturing processes using mammalian cell culture, such as Chinese hamster ovary, or CHO, cells.
This RNAi technology potentially could be applied to the improvement of manufacturing processes for
existing marketed drugs, new drugs in development and for the emerging biosimilars market. We have
developed proprietary delivery lipids that enable the efficient delivery of siRNAs into CHO cells
when grown in suspension culture, as well as other cell systems that are used for the manufacture
of biologics. Studies have demonstrated that silencing certain target genes involved in certain CHO
cell apoptotic and metabolic pathways resulted in improved cell viability as compared with
untreated cells. Additional studies demonstrated the ability to target a viral infection of CHO
cells and alter glycosylation pathways. During 2010, Alnylam Biotherapeutics formed two
collaborations with leading biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. As Alnylam Biotherapeutics
advances the technology, it plans to seek additional collaborations with established biologic
manufacturers, selling licenses, products and services.
microRNA Therapeutics
Regulus. In September 2007, we and Isis established Regulus, a company focused on the
discovery, development and commercialization of microRNA therapeutics. Regulus leverages our and
Isis technologies, know-how and intellectual property relating to microRNA therapeutics.
Regulus, which initially was established as a limited liability company, converted to a C
corporation as of January 2, 2009 and changed its name to Regulus Therapeutics Inc. In
consideration for our and Isis initial interests in Regulus, we and Isis each granted Regulus
exclusive licenses to our intellectual property for certain microRNA therapeutics as well as
certain patents in the microRNA field. At June 30, 2011, we, Isis and Sanofi owned approximately
45%, 46% and 9%, respectively, of Regulus. Regulus continues to operate as an independent company
with a separate board of directors, scientific advisory board and management team, some of whom
have options to purchase common stock of Regulus.
Regulus is exploring therapeutic opportunities that arise from microRNA dysregulation. Since
microRNAs are believed to regulate broad networks of genes and biological pathways, microRNA
therapeutics define a new and potentially high-impact strategy to target multiple nodes on disease
pathways. microRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate the expression of other genes. There
are approximately 700 microRNAs that have been identified in the human genome, and these are
believed to regulate the expression of up to 30% of all human genes. Since microRNAs may act as
master regulators of the genome and are often found to be dysregulated in disease, microRNAs
potentially represent an exciting new platform for drug discovery and development. Regulus is
advancing microRNA therapeutics in several areas including fibrosis, hepatitis C virus, or HCV,
infection, immuno-inflammatory diseases, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, and oncology.
In April 2008, Regulus entered into a worldwide strategic alliance with GSK to discover,
develop and market novel microRNA-targeted therapeutics to treat inflammatory diseases such as
rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. In connection with this alliance, Regulus
received $20.0 million in upfront payments from GSK, including a $15.0 million option fee and a
loan of $5.0 million (guaranteed by us and Isis) that will convert into Regulus common stock under
certain specified circumstances. Regulus is eligible to receive development, regulatory and sales
milestone payments for each of the four microRNA-targeted therapeutics discovered and developed as
part of the alliance, and would also receive royalty payments on worldwide sales of products
resulting from the alliance, if any. In May 2009, Regulus achieved the first demonstration of a
pharmacological effect in immune cells by specific microRNA inhibition, the initial discovery
milestone under the GSK alliance, which triggered a payment under the agreement. In July 2011,
Regulus and GSK identified a third microRNA target under this alliance triggering an additional
pre-clinical milestone payment from GSK.
In February 2010, Regulus and GSK established a new collaboration to develop and commercialize
microRNA therapeutics targeting miR-122 in all fields, with the treatment of HCV infection as the
lead indication. Under the terms of this collaboration, Regulus received $8.0 million in upfront
payments from GSK, including a $3.0 million license fee and a loan of $5.0 million (guaranteed by
us and Isis) that will convert into Regulus common stock under certain specified circumstances.
Consistent with the original GSK alliance, Regulus is eligible to receive development, regulatory
and sales milestone payments, as well as royalty payments on worldwide sales of products resulting
from the alliance, if any, as Regulus and GSK advance microRNA therapeutics targeting miR-122.
21
In June 2010, Regulus entered into a global, strategic alliance with Sanofi to discover,
develop and commercialize microRNA therapeutics on up to four microRNA targets. Under the terms of
this alliance, Regulus received $25.0 million in upfront fees and is entitled to annual research
support for three years with the option to extend research support for two additional years. In
addition, Regulus is eligible to receive royalties on microRNA therapeutic products commercialized
by Sanofi, if any. Sanofi will support 100% of the costs of clinical development and
commercialization of each program. The alliance will initially focus on the therapeutic area of
fibrosis. Regulus and Sanofi will collaborate on up to four microRNA targets, including Regulus
lead fibrosis program targeting miR-21. Sanofi also received an option for a broader technology
alliance with Regulus that provides Regulus certain rights to participate in development and
commercialization of resulting products. If exercised, this option is worth up to an additional
$50.0 million to Regulus. We and Isis are each eligible to receive 7.5% of all potential upfront
and milestone payments, in addition to single-digit royalties on product sales, if any. We received
$1.9 million from Regulus in connection with this alliance, representing 7.5% of the $25.0 million
upfront payment from Sanofi to Regulus. In addition, in October 2010, Sanofi made a $10.0 million
equity investment in Regulus.
Intellectual Property
The strength of our intellectual property portfolio relating to the development and
commercialization of siRNAs as therapeutics is essential to our business strategy. We own or
license issued patents and pending patent applications in the United States and in key markets
around the world claiming fundamental features of siRNAs and RNAi therapeutics as well as those
claiming crucial chemical modifications and promising delivery technologies. Specifically, we have
a portfolio of patents, patent applications and other intellectual property covering: fundamental
aspects of the structure and uses of siRNAs, including their use as therapeutics, and RNAi-related
mechanisms; chemical modifications to siRNAs that improve their suitability for therapeutic uses;
siRNAs directed to specific targets as treatments for particular diseases; delivery technologies,
such as in the field of cationic liposomes; and all aspects of our specific development candidates.
We believe that no other company possesses a portfolio of such broad and exclusive rights to
the patents and patent applications required for the commercialization of RNAi therapeutics. Our
intellectual property estate for RNAi therapeutics includes over 1,800 active cases and over 700
granted or issued patents, of which over 300 are issued or granted in the United States, the
European Union and Japan. We continue to seek to grow our portfolio through the creation of new
technology in this field. In addition, we are very active in our evaluation of third-party
technologies.
Our expertise in RNAi therapeutics and broad intellectual property estate have allowed us to
form alliances with leading companies, including Isis, Medtronic, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Takeda,
Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Cubist, as well as license agreements with other biotechnology companies
interested in developing RNAi therapeutic products and research companies that commercialize RNAi
reagents or services.
Given the importance of our intellectual property portfolio to our business operations, we
intend to vigorously enforce our rights and defend against challenges that have arisen or may arise
in this area.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Revenue Recognition
In January 2011, we adopted new authoritative guidance on revenue recognition for multiple
element arrangements. The guidance, which applies to multiple element arrangements entered into or
materially modified on or after January 1, 2011, amends the criteria for separating and allocating
consideration in a multiple element arrangement by modifying the fair value requirements for
revenue recognition and eliminating the use of the residual method. The fair value of deliverables
under the arrangement may be derived using a best estimate of selling price if vendor specific
objective evidence and third-party evidence is not available. Deliverables under the arrangement
will be separate units of accounting provided (i) a delivered item has value to the customer on a
standalone basis; and (ii) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and
substantially in the control of the vendor. We did not enter into any significant multiple element
arrangements or materially modify any of our existing multiple element arrangements during the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Our existing license and collaboration agreements continue to be
accounted for under previously issued revenue recognition guidance for multiple element
arrangements.
22
Except as noted above, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting
policies since the beginning of this fiscal year. Our other critical accounting policies are
described in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which
we filed with the SEC on February 18, 2011.
Results of Operations
The following data summarizes the results of our operations for the periods indicated, in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
20,614 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
$ |
41,511 |
|
|
$ |
51,181 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
33,732 |
|
|
|
38,243 |
|
|
|
70,305 |
|
|
|
74,113 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(13,118 |
) |
|
|
(11,626 |
) |
|
|
(28,794 |
) |
|
|
(22,932 |
) |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(13,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,632 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,955 |
) |
Net Revenues from Research Collaborators
We generate revenues through research collaborations. The following table summarizes our
total consolidated net revenues from research collaborators, for the periods indicated, in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Roche |
|
$ |
13,994 |
|
|
$ |
13,994 |
|
|
$ |
27,988 |
|
|
$ |
27,988 |
|
Takeda |
|
|
5,493 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
10,923 |
|
Novartis |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
4,973 |
|
Government contract |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
Other research collaborator |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
3,517 |
|
InterfeRx program, research reagent license and other |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues from research collaborators |
|
$ |
20,614 |
|
|
$ |
26,617 |
|
|
$ |
41,511 |
|
|
$ |
51,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in Novartis revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was due primarily to the planned
completion of the fifth and final year of the research program under the Novartis collaboration and
license agreement in October 2010. The decrease in government contract revenues for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was
primarily a result of the completion of our contract with the NIAID in December 2010. The decrease
in other research collaborator revenues was primarily as a result of the $1.9 million sublicense
fee recognized in connection with Regulus June 2010 alliance with Sanofi, representing 7.5% of the
$25.0 million upfront payment from Sanofi to Regulus.
23
Total deferred revenue of $180.8 million at June 30, 2011 consists of payments we have
received from collaborators, primarily Roche, Takeda, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Cubist, but have not
yet recognized pursuant to our revenue recognition policies.
For the foreseeable future, we expect our revenues to continue to be derived primarily from
our alliances with Roche, Takeda and Cubist, as well as other strategic alliances, collaborations,
foundation funding, government contracts and licensing activities.
Operating expenses
The following tables summarize our operating expenses for the periods indicated, in thousands
and as a percentage of total operating expenses, together with the changes, in thousands and
percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
25,303 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
$ |
28,136 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,833 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
General and
administrative |
|
|
8,429 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
33,732 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
38,243 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,511 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
51,652 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
$ |
52,836 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
General and
administrative |
|
|
18,653 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
21,277 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
70,305 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
74,113 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development. The following tables summarize the components of our research
and development expenses for the periods indicated, in thousands and as a percentage of total
research and development expenses, together with the changes, in thousands and percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
% of Expense |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
% of Expense |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trial and manufacturing |
|
$ |
6,569 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
5,871 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Compensation and related |
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
6,268 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
External services |
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
(1,422 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
Facilities-related |
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Lab supplies and materials |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
License fees |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
* |
% |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses |
|
$ |
25,303 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
28,136 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,833 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to lower external service
expenses, including pre-clinical costs associated with our ALN-TTR and ALN-VSP programs. License
fees decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2010 as a result of license agreements entered into during the three months ended June 30,
2010. Lab supplies and materials and compensation and related expenses also decreased during the
three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily
to the reduction in workforce in connection with our September 2010 corporate restructuring.
Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in clinical trial and manufacturing expenses
as we continue to advance our clinical programs.
24
We expect to continue to devote a substantial portion of our resources to research and
development expenses as we continue development of our and our collaborators product candidates
and focus on continuing to develop drug delivery-related technologies, however, we expect that
research and development expenses will remain consistent in the second half of 2011.
A significant portion of our research and development costs are not tracked by project as they
benefit multiple projects or our technology platform and because our most-advanced programs are in
the early stages of clinical development. However, our collaboration agreements contain
cost-sharing arrangements pursuant to which certain costs incurred under the project are
reimbursed. Costs reimbursed under the agreements typically include certain direct external costs
and a negotiated full-time equivalent labor rate for the actual time worked on the project. In
addition, we have been reimbursed under government contracts for certain allowable costs including
direct internal and external costs. As a result, although a significant portion of our research and
development expenses are not tracked on a project-by-project basis, we do track direct external
costs attributable to, and the actual time our employees worked on, our collaborations and
government contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
% of Expense |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
% of Expense |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical trial and manufacturing |
|
$ |
12,760 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
10,275 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Compensation and related |
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
12,318 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
External services |
|
|
9,420 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
10,487 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
(1,067 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Facilities-related |
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
5,918 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Lab supplies and materials |
|
|
3,276 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4,268 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
License fees |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development expenses |
|
$ |
51,652 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
52,836 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,184 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to lower external service expenses,
including pre-clinical costs associated with our ALN-TTR and ALN-VSP programs. Partially
offsetting this decrease was an increase in clinical trial and manufacturing expenses as we
continue to advance our clinical programs.
General and administrative. The following tables summarize the components of our general and
administrative expenses for the periods indicated, in thousands and as a percentage of total
general and administrative expenses, together with the changes, in thousands and percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and professional services |
|
$ |
4,198 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
$ |
5,499 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,301 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
Compensation and related |
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
Facilities-related |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
8,429 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,107 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended June
30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 was due primarily to lower consulting
and professional services expenses related to business activities, primarily legal activities, a
description of which is set forth below under Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings.
We
expect that general and administrative expenses will remain
consistent in the second half of 2011.
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Category |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and professional services |
|
$ |
9,674 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
$ |
11,635 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,961 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Compensation and related |
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
Facilities-related |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
18,653 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
21,277 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,624 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in general and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30,
2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 was due primarily to lower consulting and
professional services expenses related to business activities, primarily legal activities, a
description of which is set forth below under Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings.
Other income (expense)
We
incurred $1.0 million and $2.1 million of equity in loss of joint venture (Regulus
Therapeutics Inc.) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to
$3.9 million and $5.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively,
related to our share of the net losses incurred by Regulus.
Interest income was $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, as compared to $0.6 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to lower average cash, cash equivalent
and marketable securities balances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes our cash flow activities for the periods indicated, in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(30,109 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,955 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used
in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
13,320 |
|
|
|
18,187 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(16,095 |
) |
|
|
(31,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(32,884 |
) |
|
|
(39,915 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
(34,425 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
(71,286 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
74,599 |
|
|
|
137,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
67,110 |
|
|
$ |
66,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we commenced operations in 2002, we have generated significant losses. At June 30,
2011, we had an accumulated deficit of $373.5 million. At June 30, 2011, we had cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities of $316.0 million, compared to cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities of $349.9 million at December 31, 2010. We invest primarily in cash
equivalents, U.S. government and municipal obligations, high-grade corporate notes and commercial
paper. Our investment objectives are, primarily, to assure liquidity and preservation of capital
and, secondarily, to obtain investment income. All of our investments in debt securities are
recorded at fair value and are available-for-sale. Fair value is determined based on quoted market
prices and models using observable data inputs. We have not recorded any impairment charges related
to our fixed income marketable securities at June 30, 2011.
Operating activities
We have required significant amounts of cash to fund our operating activities as a result of
net losses since our inception.
26
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in operating activities of $32.9 million was
due primarily to our net loss and a decrease in deferred revenue of $30.3 million. These amounts
were partially offset by the receipt of our income tax refund of $10.7 million in March 2011. In
addition, net cash used in operating activities is adjusted for non-cash items to reconcile net
loss to net cash used in or provided by operating activities. These non-cash adjustments consist
primarily of stock-based compensation, equity in loss of joint venture (Regulus Therapeutics Inc.),
and depreciation and amortization.
We expect that we will require significant amounts of cash to fund our operating activities
for the foreseeable future as we continue to develop and advance our research and development
initiatives. The actual amount of overall expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including
the timing of expenses, the timing and terms of collaboration agreements or other strategic
transactions, if any, and the timing and progress of our research and development efforts.
Investing activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by investing activities of $24.9
million resulted primarily from net sales and maturities of marketable securities. For the six
months ended June 30, 2010, net cash used in investing activities of $34.4 million resulted
primarily from net purchases of marketable securities of $31.9 million and purchases of property
and equipment of $2.5 million related to our Cambridge facility.
Financing activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash of $0.5 million provided by financing
activities was due to proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with stock option
exercises. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities of
$3.1 million was due to proceeds of $1.0 million from our issuance of common stock to Novartis in
April 2010, as well as proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with stock option
exercises.
Operating Capital Requirements
We do not know when, if ever, we will successfully develop or be able to commence sales of any
product. Therefore, we anticipate that we will continue to generate significant losses for the
foreseeable future as a result of planned expenditures for research and development activities
relating to our drug development programs, including the development of drug delivery technologies
and clinical trial costs, extension of the capabilities of our technology platform, including
through business initiatives, continued management and growth of our patent portfolio,
collaborations and general corporate activities. Based on our current operating plan, we believe
that our existing cash, cash equivalents and fixed income marketable securities, for which we have
not recognized any impairment charges, together with the cash we expect to generate under our
current alliances, will be sufficient to fund our planned operations for at least the next several
years, For this and other reasons discussed below, we may require significant additional funds
earlier than we currently expect in order to develop, conduct clinical trials for and commercialize
any product candidates.
In the future, we may seek additional funding through additional collaborative arrangements
and public or private financings. In July 2011, we filed a shelf registration statement with the
SEC for an indeterminate number of shares of common stock and/or other securities, for up to an
aggregate of $150 million, for future issuance. During the current downturn in global financial
markets, some companies have experienced difficulties accessing their cash equivalents and
investment securities and raising capital generally, which have had a material adverse impact on
their liquidity. The current economic downturn has diminished the availability of capital and may
limit our ability to access these markets to obtain financing in the future. As a result of these
and other factors, additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. In
addition, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our
stockholders. For example, if we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, further
dilution to our existing stockholders may result. In addition, as a condition to providing
additional funds to us, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior to those
of existing stockholders. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required
to significantly delay or curtail one or more of our research or development programs. We also
could be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require
us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates that we would otherwise
pursue.
Even if we are able to raise additional funds in a timely manner, our future capital
requirements may vary from what we expect and will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
|
our progress in demonstrating that siRNAs can be active as drugs; |
27
|
|
|
our ability to develop relatively standard procedures for selecting and modifying siRNA
product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
progress in our research and development programs, as well as the magnitude of these
programs; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of milestone and other payments, if any, from
present and future collaborators, if any; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of funding under current and future government or foundation
contracts, if any; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain and establish additional collaborative arrangements and/or new
business initiatives; |
|
|
|
|
the resources, time and costs required to successfully initiate and complete our
pre-clinical and clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, and obtain and maintain
licenses to third-party intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
the resources, time and cost required for the preparation, filing, prosecution,
maintenance and enforcement of patent claims; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage the potential impact of our corporate
restructuring and workforce reduction on our culture, collaborative relationships and
business operations; |
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with legal activities, including litigation, arising in the
course of our business activities and our ability to prevail in any such legal disputes; |
|
|
|
|
progress in the research and development programs of Regulus; and |
|
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of sales and royalties, if any, from our potential products. |
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The disclosure of our contractual obligations and commitments is set forth under the heading
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsContractual
Obligations and Commitments in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations and commitments since
December 31, 2010.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a new accounting standard that
clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosures for fair
value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new standard is
effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011.
We do not expect that adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that eliminates the option to present the
components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity, requires the
consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income and requires an entity to
present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net
income. The amendments in this new standard do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive
income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments
affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This new standard is required to be applied retrospectively
and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. As this
new standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will not impact our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
As part of our investment portfolio, we own financial instruments that are sensitive to market
risks. The investment portfolio is used to preserve our capital until it is required to fund
operations, including our research and development activities. Our marketable securities consist of
U.S. government and municipal obligations, high-grade corporate notes and commercial paper. All of
our investments in debt securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair
value. Our available-for-sale investments in debt securities are sensitive to changes in interest
rates and changes in the credit ratings of the issuers. Interest rate changes would result in a
change in the net fair value of these financial instruments due to the difference between the
market interest rate and the market interest rate at the date of purchase of the financial
instrument. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 50 basis
points, or one-half of a percentage point, from levels at June 30, 2011, the net fair value of our
interest-sensitive financial instruments would have resulted in a hypothetical decline of $1.1
million. A downgrade in the credit rating of an issuer of a debt security or further deterioration
of the credit markets could result in a decline in the fair value of the debt instruments. Our
investment guidelines prohibit investment in auction rate securities and we do not believe we have
any direct exposure to losses relating from mortgage-based securities or derivatives related
thereto such as credit-default swaps. We have not recorded any impairment charges to our fixed
income marketable securities at June 30, 2011.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and vice president of
finance and treasurer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2011. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, means
28
controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys
management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011, our chief executive officer and vice
president of finance and treasurer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a15(d) and
15d15(d) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2011 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Tekmira Litigation
On March 16, 2011, Tekmira and Protiva filed a civil complaint in the Business Litigation
Section of the Suffolk County Superior Court, in Boston, Massachusetts against us and on June 3,
2011, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding AlCana, a research collaborator of ours, as
a defendant. The amended complaint alleges misappropriation of the plaintiffs confidential and
proprietary information and trade secrets, civil conspiracy, and tortious interference with
contractual relationships by us and AlCana, and unjust enrichment, contractual breach, breach of
the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition, false advertising, and
unfair and deceptive trade practices by us, and seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages and
other relief. On April 6, 2011, we timely served and filed an answer to the plaintiffs original
complaint denying the plaintiffs claims in this action, together with counterclaims against the
plaintiffs. On June 28, 2011, we timely served and filed an answer to the plaintiffs amended
complaint denying the plaintiffs claims and counterclaims against the plaintiffs asserting breach
of contract, defamation, breach of covenant not to sue, breach of patent prosecution and non-use
provisions, misappropriation of confidential and proprietary information and trade secrets, unjust
enrichment, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as violations of
Massachusetts statutes. We are seeking the dismissal of plaintiffs claims and judgment in our
favor, as well as damages and equitable relief.
University of Utah Litigation
On March 22, 2011, The University of Utah, or the University, filed a civil complaint in the
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by against us, Max Planck
Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Wissenschaften E.V. and Max Planck Innovation, together, Max Planck,
Whitehead, MIT and the University of Massachusetts, or UMass, claiming a professor at the
University is the sole inventor, or in the alternative, a joint inventor, of the Tuschl patents.
The University did not serve the original complaint on us or the other defendants. On July 6,
2011, the University filed an amended complaint alleging substantially the same claims against us,
Max Planck, Whitehead, MIT and UMass. The amended complaint was served on us on July 14, 2011. The
University is seeking changes to the inventorship of the Tuschl patents, unspecified damages and
other relief.
Although we believe we have meritorious defenses to each of the claims in the lawsuits
described above and intend to fully defend ourselves in these matters, litigation is subject to
inherent uncertainty and a court could ultimately rule against us in one or both of these matters.
In addition, the defense of litigation and related matters are costly and may divert the attention
of our management and other resources that would otherwise be engaged in running our business.
29
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business is subject to numerous risks. We caution you that the following important
factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf in filings with the SEC, press releases,
communications with investors and oral statements. All statements other than statements relating to
historical matters should be considered forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the
words believe, expect, anticipate, may, could, intend, will, plan, target, goal
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all
forward-looking statements contain these words. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be
wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks
and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in the discussion below will be important in determining
future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results
may vary materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. We explicitly disclaim
any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that
arise after the date hereof. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosure we make in
our reports filed with the SEC.
Risks Related to Our Business
Risks Related to Being an Early Stage Company
Because we have a short operating history, there is a limited amount of information about us
upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects.
Our operations began in 2002 and we have only a limited operating history upon which you can
evaluate our business and prospects. In addition, as an early-stage company, we have limited
experience and have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully overcome many of the risks and
uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in new and rapidly evolving fields, particularly
in the biopharmaceutical area. For example, to execute our business plan, we will need to
successfully:
|
|
|
execute product development activities using unproven technologies related to
both RNAi and to the delivery of siRNAs to the relevant tissues and cells; |
|
|
|
|
build and maintain a strong intellectual property portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
gain regulatory acceptance for the development of our product candidates and
market success for any products we commercialize; |
|
|
|
|
develop and maintain successful strategic alliances; and |
|
|
|
|
manage our spending as costs and expenses increase due to clinical trials,
regulatory approvals and commercialization. |
If we are unsuccessful in accomplishing these objectives, we may not be able to develop
product candidates, commercialize products, raise capital, expand our business or continue our
operations.
The approach we are taking to discover and develop novel RNAi therapeutics is unproven and may
never lead to marketable products.
We have concentrated our efforts and therapeutic product research on RNAi technology, and our
future success depends on the successful development of this technology and products based on it.
Neither we nor any other company has received regulatory approval to market therapeutics utilizing
siRNAs, the class of molecule we are trying to develop into drugs. The scientific discoveries that
form the basis for our efforts to discover and develop new drugs are relatively new. The scientific
evidence to support the feasibility of developing drugs based on these discoveries is both
preliminary and limited. Skepticism as to the feasibility of developing RNAi therapeutics has been
expressed in scientific literature. For example, there are potential challenges to achieving safe
RNAi therapeutics based on the so-called off-target effects and activation of the interferon
response. In addition, decisions by other companies with respect to their RNAi development efforts
may increase skepticism in the marketplace regarding the potential for RNAi therapeutics.
30
Relatively few product candidates based on these discoveries have ever been tested in animals
or humans. siRNAs may not naturally possess the inherent properties typically required of drugs,
such as the ability to be stable in the body long enough to reach the tissues in which their
effects are required, nor the ability to enter cells within these tissues in order to exert their
effects. We currently have only limited data, and no conclusive evidence, to suggest that we can
introduce these drug-like properties into siRNAs. We may spend large amounts of money trying to
introduce these properties, and may never succeed in doing so. In addition, these compounds may not
demonstrate in patients the chemical and pharmacological properties ascribed to them in laboratory
studies, and they may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective or harmful
ways. As a result, we may never succeed in developing a marketable product, we may not become
profitable and the value of our common stock will decline.
Further, our focus solely on RNAi technology for developing drugs, as opposed to multiple,
more proven technologies for drug development, increases the risks associated with the ownership of
our common stock. If we are not successful in developing a product candidate using RNAi technology,
we may be required to change the scope and direction of our product development activities. In that
case, we may not be able to identify and implement successfully an alternative product development
strategy.
Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Need for Financing
We have a history of losses and may never become and remain consistently profitable.
We have experienced significant operating losses since our inception. At June 30, 2011, we had
an accumulated deficit of $373.5 million. To date, we have not developed any products nor generated
any revenues from the sale of products. Further, we do not expect to generate any such revenues in
the foreseeable future. We expect to continue to incur annual net operating losses over the next
several years and will require substantial resources over the next several years as we expand our
efforts to discover, develop and commercialize RNAi therapeutics. We anticipate that the majority
of any revenue we generate over the next several years will be from alliances with pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies or funding from contracts with the government or foundations, but
cannot be certain that we will be able to secure or maintain these alliances or contracts, or meet
the obligations or achieve any milestones that we may be required to meet or achieve to receive
payments. We anticipate that revenue derived from such sources will not be sufficient to make us
consistently profitable.
We believe that to become and remain consistently profitable, we must succeed in discovering,
developing and commercializing novel drugs with significant market potential. This will require us
to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including pre-clinical testing and clinical
trial stages of development, obtaining regulatory approval for these novel drugs and manufacturing,
marketing and selling them. We may never succeed in these activities, and may never generate
revenues that are significant enough to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability,
we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. If we
cannot become and remain consistently profitable, the market price of our common stock could
decline. In addition, we may be unable to raise capital, expand our business, diversify our product
offerings or continue our operations.
We will require substantial additional funds to complete our research and development activities
and if additional funds are not available, we may need to critically limit, significantly scale
back or cease our operations.
We have used substantial funds to develop our RNAi technologies and will require substantial
funds to conduct further research and development, including pre-clinical testing and clinical
trials of any product candidates, and to manufacture and market any products that are approved for
commercial sale. Because the successful development of our products is uncertain, we are unable to
estimate the actual funds we will require to develop and commercialize them.
Our future capital requirements and the period for which we expect our existing resources to
support our operations may vary from what we expect. We have based our expectations on a number of
factors, many of which are difficult to predict or are outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
our progress in demonstrating that siRNAs can be active as drugs; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop relatively standard procedures for selecting and modifying siRNA
product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
progress in our research and development programs, as well as the magnitude of these
programs; |
|
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of milestone and other payments, if any, from present and
future collaborators, if
any; |
31
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of funding under current and future government or
foundation contracts, if any; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain and establish additional collaborative arrangements and/or new
business initiatives; |
|
|
|
|
the resources, time and costs required to initiate and complete our pre-clinical
and clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, and obtain and maintain licenses to
third-party intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
the resources, time and cost required for the preparation, filing, prosecution,
maintenance and enforcement of patent claims; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage the potential impact of our corporate
restructuring and workforce reduction on our culture, collaborative relationships and
business operations; |
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with legal activities, including litigation, arising in the
course of our business activities and our ability to prevail in any such legal disputes; |
|
|
|
|
progress in the research and development programs of Regulus; and |
|
|
|
|
the timing, receipt and amount of sales and royalties, if any, from our potential
products. |
If our estimates and predictions relating to these factors are incorrect, we may need to
modify our operating plan.
Even if our estimates are correct, we will be required to seek additional funding in the
future and intend to do so through either collaborative arrangements, public or private equity
offerings or debt financings, or a combination of one or more of these funding sources. Additional
funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, the terms of any
financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders. For example, if we
raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, under our shelf registration statement or
otherwise, further dilution to our stockholders will result. In addition, as a condition to
providing additional funds to us, future investors may demand, and may be granted, rights superior
to those of existing stockholders. Moreover, our investor rights agreement with Novartis provides
Novartis with the right generally to maintain its ownership percentage in us, subject to certain
exceptions. These rights continue until the earlier of any sale by Novartis of shares of our common
stock and the expiration or termination of our license agreement with Novartis, subject to certain
exceptions. Pursuant to the terms of its investor rights agreement with us, Novartis purchased an
aggregate of 335,033 shares of our common stock, resulting in aggregate payments to us of $7.6
million. These purchases allowed Novartis to maintain its ownership position of approximately 13.4%
of our outstanding common stock. While the exercise of these rights by Novartis has provided us
with funding, and the exercise in the future by Novartis may provide us with additional funding
under some circumstances, these exercises have caused, and any future exercise of these rights by
Novartis will also cause further, dilution to our stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may
involve restrictive covenants that could limit our flexibility in conducting future business
activities and, in the event of insolvency, would be paid before holders of equity securities
received any distribution of corporate assets.
If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly
delay or curtail one or more of our research or development programs or undergo additional
reductions in our workforce or other corporate restructuring activities. We also could be required
to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish
rights to some of our technologies, product candidates or products that we would otherwise pursue
on our own.
If the estimates we make, or the assumptions on which we rely, in preparing our condensed
consolidated financial statements prove inaccurate, our actual results may vary from those
reflected in our projections and accruals.
Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, the amounts of charges
accrued by us and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. We cannot assure you, however, that our estimates, or the assumptions underlying
them, will be correct.
32
The investment of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is subject to risks which
may cause losses and affect the liquidity of these investments.
At June 30, 2011, we had $316.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
We historically have invested these amounts in corporate bonds, commercial paper, securities issued
by the U.S. government and municipal obligations, certificates of deposit and money market funds
meeting the criteria of our investment policy, which is focused on the preservation of our capital.
These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks,
including the impact of U.S. sub-prime mortgage defaults that have affected various sectors of the
financial markets and caused credit and liquidity issues. We may realize losses in the fair value
of these investments or a complete loss of these investments, which would have a negative effect on
our condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, should our investments cease paying
or reduce the amount of interest paid to us, our interest income would suffer. These market risks
associated with our investment portfolio may have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
Our license and collaboration agreements with pharmaceutical companies are important to our
business. If these pharmaceutical companies do not successfully develop drugs pursuant to these
agreements or we develop drugs targeting the same diseases as our non-exclusive licensees, our
business could be adversely affected.
In July 2007, we entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Roche. Under the
license and collaboration agreement we granted Roche a non-exclusive license to our intellectual
property to develop and commercialize therapeutic products that function through RNAi, subject to
our existing contractual obligations to third parties. The license is limited to the therapeutic
areas of oncology, respiratory diseases, metabolic diseases and certain liver diseases and may be
expanded to include up to 18 additional therapeutic areas, comprising substantially all other
fields of human disease, as identified and agreed upon by the parties, upon payment to us by Roche
of an additional $50.0 million for each additional therapeutic area, if any. In addition, in
exchange for our contributions under the collaboration agreement, for each RNAi therapeutic product
developed by Roche, its affiliates, or sublicensees under the collaboration agreement, we are
entitled to receive milestone payments upon achievement of specified development and sales events,
totaling up to an aggregate of $100.0 million per therapeutic target, together with royalty
payments based on worldwide annual net sales, if any. In November 2010, Roche announced the
discontinuation of certain activities in research and early development, including their RNAi
research efforts. Our license and collaboration agreement with Roche currently remains in effect.
Roche may assign its rights and obligations under the license and collaboration agreement to a
third party in connection with the sale or transfer of its entire RNAi business.
In May 2008, we entered into a similar license and collaboration agreement with Takeda, which
is limited to the therapeutic areas of oncology and metabolic diseases, and which may be expanded
to include up to 20 additional therapeutic areas, comprising substantially all other fields of
human disease, as identified and agreed upon by the parties, upon payment to us by Takeda of an
additional $50.0 million for each additional therapeutic area, if any. For each RNAi therapeutic
product developed by Takeda, its affiliates and sublicensees, we are entitled to receive specified
development and commercialization milestones, totaling up to $171.0 million per product, together
with royalty payments based on worldwide annual net sales, if any. In addition, we agreed that we
will not grant any other party rights to develop RNAi therapeutics in the Asian territory through
May 2013.
In September 2010, Novartis exercised its right under our collaboration and license agreement
to select 31 designated gene targets, for which Novartis has exclusive rights to discover, develop
and commercialize RNAi therapeutic products using our intellectual property and technology. Under
the terms of the collaboration and license agreement, for any RNAi therapeutic products Novartis
develops against these targets, we are entitled to receive milestone payments upon achievement of
certain specified development and annual net sales events, up to an aggregate of $75.0 million per
therapeutic product, as well as royalties on annual net sales of any such product.
If Takeda, Novartis or, if Roche assigns our license, Roches assignee, fails to successfully
develop products using our technology, we may not receive any milestone or royalty payments under
these agreements. In addition, even if Takeda is not successful in its efforts, we are limited in
our ability to form alliances with other parties in the Asia territory until 2013. We also have the
option under the Takeda agreement, exercisable until the start of Phase III development, to opt-in
under a 50-50 profit sharing agreement to the development and commercialization in the United
States of up to four Takeda licensed products, and would be entitled to opt-in rights for two
additional products for each additional field expansion, if any, elected by Takeda under the
collaboration agreement. If Takeda fails to successfully develop products, we may not realize any
economic benefit from these opt-in rights.
33
Finally, either Takeda or an assignee of Roche could become a competitor of ours in the
development of RNAi-based drugs targeting the same diseases that we choose to target. Takeda has,
and an assignee of Roche could have, significantly greater financial resources than we do and far
more experience in developing and marketing drugs, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage
if we were to compete with them in the development of RNAi-based drugs targeting the same disease.
We may not be able to execute our business strategy if we are unable to enter into alliances
with other companies that can provide business and scientific capabilities and funds for the
development and commercialization of our product candidates. If we are unsuccessful in forming
or maintaining these alliances on favorable terms, our business may not succeed.
We do not have any capability for sales, marketing or distribution and have limited
capabilities for drug development. In addition, we believe that other companies are expending
substantial resources in developing safe and effective means of delivering siRNAs to relevant cell
and tissue types. Accordingly, we have entered into alliances with other companies and
collaborators that we believe can provide such capabilities, and we intend to enter into additional
alliances in the future. For example, we intend to enter into (1) non-exclusive platform and/or
multi-target discovery alliances which will enable our collaborators to develop RNAi therapeutics
and will bring in additional funding with which we can develop our RNAi therapeutics, and (2)
worldwide or specific geographic partnerships on select RNAi therapeutic programs. In such
alliances, we expect our current, and may expect our future, collaborators to provide substantial
capabilities in delivery of RNAi therapeutics to the relevant cell or tissue type, clinical
development, regulatory affairs, and/or marketing, sales and distribution. For example, under our
agreements with MIT, Tekmira, UBC and AlCana, among others, we have access to certain existing
delivery technologies and/or are developing additional delivery capabilities. In addition, under
our collaboration with Medtronic, we are jointly developing ALN-HTT, an RNAi therapeutic for HD,
which would be delivered using an implanted infusion device developed by Medtronic. The success of
this collaboration will depend, in part, on Medtronics expertise in the area of delivery of drugs
by infusion device, something that they have never done before with our product candidates. In
other alliances, we may expect our collaborators to develop, market and sell certain of our product
candidates. We may have limited or no control over the development, sales, marketing and
distribution activities of these third parties. Our future revenues may depend heavily on the
success of the efforts of these third parties. For example, we will rely entirely on Kyowa Hakko
Kirin for development and commercialization of any RNAi products for the treatment of RSV in Asia.
If Kyowa Hakko Kirin is not successful in its commercialization efforts, our future revenues from
RNAi therapeutics for the treatment of RSV may be adversely affected.
We may not be successful in entering into such alliances on favorable terms due to various
factors, including our ability to successfully demonstrate proof of concept for our technology in
man, our ability to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our specific drug candidates, and the
strength of our intellectual property. Even if we do succeed in securing any such alliances, we may
not be able to maintain them if, for example, development or approval of a product candidate is
delayed or sales of an approved drug are disappointing. Furthermore, any delay in entering into
collaboration agreements could delay the development and commercialization of our product
candidates and reduce their competitiveness even if they reach the market. Any such delay related
to our collaborations could adversely affect our business.
For certain product candidates that we may develop, we have formed collaborations to fund all
or part of the costs of drug development and commercialization, such as our collaborations with
Takeda, Cubist and Medtronic. We may not, however, be able to enter into additional collaborations,
and the terms of any collaboration agreement we do secure may not be favorable to us. If we are not
successful in our efforts to enter into future collaboration arrangements with respect to a
particular product candidate, we may not have sufficient funds to develop that or any other product
candidate internally, or to bring any product candidates to market. If we do not have sufficient
funds to develop and bring our product candidates to market, we will not be able to generate sales
revenues from these product candidates, and this will substantially harm our business.
If any collaborator terminates or fails to perform its obligations under agreements with us, the
development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed or terminated.
Our dependence on collaborators for capabilities and funding means that our business could be
adversely affected if any collaborator terminates its collaboration agreement with us or fails to
perform its obligations under that agreement. Our current or future collaborations, if any, may not
be scientifically or commercially successful. Disputes may arise in the future with respect to the
ownership of rights to technology or products developed with collaborators, which could have an
adverse effect on our ability to develop and commercialize any affected product candidate.
Our current collaborations allow, and we expect that any future collaborations will allow,
either party to terminate the
34
collaboration for a material breach by the other party. Our agreement with Kyowa Hakko Kirin
for the development and commercialization of RSV therapeutics for the treatment of RSV infection in
Japan and other major markets in Asia may be terminated by Kyowa Hakko Kirin without cause upon
180-days prior written notice to us, subject to certain conditions, and our agreement with Cubist
relating to the development and commercialization of certain RSV therapeutics in territories
outside of Asia may be terminated by Cubist at any time upon as little as three months prior
written notice, if such notice is given prior to the acceptance for filing of the first application
for regulatory approval of a licensed product. If we were to lose a commercialization collaborator,
we would have to attract a new collaborator or develop internal sales, distribution and marketing
capabilities, which would require us to invest significant amounts of financial and management
resources.
In addition, if we have a dispute with a collaborator over the ownership of technology or
other matters, or if a collaborator terminates its collaboration with us, for breach or otherwise,
or determines not to pursue the research and development of RNAi therapeutics, it would be
difficult for us to attract new collaborators and could adversely affect how we are perceived in
the business and financial communities. Moreover, a collaborator, or in the event of a change in
control of a collaborator or the assignment of a collaboration agreement to a third party, the
successor entity or assignee, could determine that it is in its financial interest to:
|
|
|
pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products, either on its
own or jointly with others, that may be competitive with the products on which it is
collaborating with us or which could affect its commitment to the collaboration with us; |
|
|
|
|
pursue higher-priority programs or change the focus of its development programs,
which could affect the collaborators commitment to us; or |
|
|
|
|
if it has marketing rights, choose to devote fewer resources to the marketing of
our product candidates, if any are approved for marketing, than it does for product
candidates developed without us. |
If any of these occur, the development and commercialization of one or more product candidates
could be delayed, curtailed or terminated because we may not have sufficient financial resources or
capabilities to continue such development and commercialization on our own.
Regulus is important to our business. If Regulus does not successfully develop drugs pursuant to
our license and collaboration agreement, our business could be adversely affected. In addition,
disagreements between us and Isis regarding the development of microRNA technology may cause
significant delays and other impediments in the development of this technology, which could
negatively affect the value of the technology and our investment in Regulus.
In September 2007, we and Isis formed Regulus, of which we owned approximately 45% at June 30,
2011, to discover, develop and commercialize microRNA therapeutics. Regulus is exploring
therapeutic opportunities that arise from dysregulation of microRNAs. Neither Regulus nor any other
company has received regulatory approval to market therapeutics utilizing microRNA technology. In
connection with the establishment of Regulus, we exclusively licensed to Regulus our intellectual
property rights covering microRNA technology. Generally, we do not have rights to pursue microRNA
therapeutics independently of Regulus. If Regulus is unable to discover, develop and commercialize
microRNA therapeutics, our business could be adversely affected.
Moreover, Regulus has formed a collaboration with GSK pursuant to which GSK has provided
Regulus with loans totaling $5.4 million, including accrued interest. These loans are guaranteed by
us and Isis. If Regulus is unable to repay GSK or convert the loans into Regulus common stock, we
could be liable for our share of these obligations, and our business could be adversely affected.
In addition, Regulus operates as an independent company, governed by a board of directors. We
and Isis each can elect an equal number of directors to serve on the Regulus board. Regulus
researches and develops microRNA projects and programs pursuant to an operating plan that is
approved by its board. Any disagreements between Isis and us regarding a development decision or
any other decision submitted to Regulus board may cause significant delays in the development and
commercialization of microRNA technology and could negatively affect the value of our investment in
Regulus.
We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials, and if they fail to fulfill their
obligations, our development plans may be adversely affected.
We rely on independent clinical investigators, contract research organizations and other
third-party service providers to assist us in managing, monitoring and otherwise carrying out our
clinical trials. We have and we plan to continue to contract with certain
35
third-parties to provide certain services, including site selection, enrollment, monitoring
and data management services. Although we depend heavily on these parties, we do not control them
and therefore, we cannot be assured that these third-parties will adequately perform all of their
contractual obligations to us. If our third-party service providers cannot adequately fulfill their
obligations to us on a timely and satisfactory basis or if the quality and accuracy of our clinical
trial data is compromised due to failure to adhere to our protocols or regulatory requirements or
if such third-parties otherwise fail to meet deadlines, our development plans may be delayed or
terminated.
We have very limited manufacturing experience or resources and we must incur significant costs
to develop this expertise or rely on third parties to manufacture our products.
We have very limited manufacturing experience. Our internal manufacturing capabilities are
limited to small-scale production of non-current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP material for
use in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Some of our product candidates utilize specialized
formulations, such as liposomes or LNPs, whose scale-up and manufacturing could be very difficult.
We also have very limited experience in such scale-up and manufacturing, requiring us to depend on
a limited number of third parties, who might not be able to deliver in a timely manner, or at all.
In order to develop products, apply for regulatory approvals and commercialize our products, we
will need to develop, contract for, or otherwise arrange for the necessary manufacturing
capabilities. We may manufacture clinical trial materials ourselves or we may rely on others to
manufacture the materials we will require for any clinical trials that we initiate. There are a
limited number of manufacturers that supply synthetic siRNAs. We currently rely on several contract
manufacturers for our supply of synthetic siRNAs. There are risks inherent in pharmaceutical
manufacturing that could affect the ability of our contract manufacturers to meet our delivery time
requirements or provide adequate amounts of material to meet our needs. Included in these risks are
synthesis and purification failures and contamination during the manufacturing process, which could
result in unusable product and cause delays in our development process, as well as additional
expense to us. To fulfill our siRNA requirements, we may also need to secure alternative suppliers
of synthetic siRNAs. In addition to the manufacture of the synthetic siRNAs, we may have additional
manufacturing requirements related to the technology required to deliver the siRNA to the relevant
cell or tissue type. In some cases, the delivery technology we utilize is highly specialized or
proprietary, and for technical and legal reasons, we may have access to only one or a limited
number of potential manufacturers for such delivery technology. For example, under our agreements
with Tekmira, we are obligated, subject to certain exceptions specified in our contract with
Tekmira, to utilize Tekmira for the manufacture of all LNP-formulated product candidates covered by
Tekmiras intellectual property beginning during pre-clinical development and continuing through
Phase II clinical trials. Failure by manufacturers to properly formulate our siRNAs for delivery
could result in unusable product. Furthermore, a breach by such manufacturers of their contractual
obligations would cause delays in our discovery and development process, as well as additional
expense to us.
The manufacturing process for any products that we may develop is subject to the FDA and
foreign regulatory authority approval process and we will need to contract with manufacturers who
can meet all applicable FDA and foreign regulatory authority requirements on an ongoing basis. In
addition, if we receive the necessary regulatory approval for any product candidate, we also expect
to rely on third parties, including our commercial collaborators, to produce materials required for
commercial supply. We may experience difficulty in obtaining adequate manufacturing capacity for
our needs. If we are unable to obtain or maintain contract manufacturing for these product
candidates, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to successfully
develop and commercialize our products.
To the extent that we enter into manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend
on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner and consistent with
contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and quality
assurance. The failure of a third-party manufacturer to perform its obligations as expected could
adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:
|
|
|
we may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials of products that are under
development; |
|
|
|
|
we may be delayed in submitting regulatory applications, or receiving regulatory
approvals, for our product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
we may lose the cooperation of our collaborators; |
|
|
|
|
our products could be the subject of inspections by regulatory authorities; |
|
|
|
|
we may be required to cease distribution or recall some or all batches of our products;
and |
36
|
|
|
ultimately, we may not be able to meet commercial demands for our products. |
If any third-party manufacturer with whom we contract fails to perform its obligations, we may
be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we may not have the capabilities or
resources, or enter into an agreement with a different third-party manufacturer, which we may not
be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills required to
manufacture our product may be unique to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty
transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such
skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be
required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with
quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays associated with
the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product
candidates in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a manufacturer may possess technology
related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such manufacturer owns independently. This
would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such
manufacturer in order to have another third party manufacture our products.
We have no sales, marketing or distribution experience and would have to invest significant
financial and management resources to establish these capabilities.
We have no sales, marketing or distribution experience. We currently expect to rely heavily on
third parties to launch and market certain of our product candidates, if approved. However, if we
elect to develop internal sales, distribution and marketing capabilities as part of our core
product strategy, we will need to invest significant financial and management resources. For core
products where we decide to perform sales, marketing and distribution functions ourselves, we could
face a number of additional risks, including:
|
|
|
we may not be able to attract and build a significant marketing or sales force; |
|
|
|
|
the cost of establishing a marketing or sales force may not be justifiable in
light of the revenues generated by any particular product; and |
|
|
|
|
our direct sales and marketing efforts may not be successful. |
If we are unable to develop our own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, we will
not be able to successfully commercialize our core products without reliance on third parties.
The current credit and financial market conditions may exacerbate certain risks affecting our
business.
Due to the tightening of global credit, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance
of our third-party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. We rely on third parties for several
important aspects of our business, including significant portions of our manufacturing needs,
development of product candidates and conduct of clinical trials. If such third parties are unable
to satisfy their commitments to us, our business could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Managing Our Operations
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified key management and scientists, staff,
consultants and advisors, particularly given our workforce reduction, our ability to implement
our business plan may be adversely affected.
We are highly dependent upon our senior management and scientific staff. The loss of the
service of any of the members of our senior management, including Dr. John Maraganore, our Chief
Executive Officer, may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of product development and
other business objectives. Our employment agreements with our key personnel are terminable without
notice. We do not carry key man life insurance on any of our employees.
We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, universities, governmental entities and other research institutions, many
of which have substantially greater resources with which to reward qualified individuals than we
do. In addition, as a result of our September 2010 corporate restructuring and workforce reduction,
we may face additional challenges in retaining our existing employees and recruiting new employees
to join our company as our business needs change. We may be unable to attract and retain suitably
qualified individuals, and our failure to do so could have
an adverse effect on our ability to implement our future business plan.
37
We may have difficulty managing our growth and expanding our operations successfully as we seek
to evolve from a company primarily involved in discovery and pre-clinical testing into one that
develops and commercializes drugs.
Since we commenced operations in 2002, we have grown substantially. At June 30, 2011, we had
173 employees in our facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts. We expect that as we seek to increase
the number of product candidates we are developing we will need to expand our operations in the
future. This growth may place a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure. If
product candidates we develop enter and advance through clinical trials, we will need to expand our
development, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities or contract with other
organizations to provide these capabilities for us. As our operations expand due to our development
progress, we expect that we will need to manage additional relationships with various
collaborators, suppliers and other organizations. Our ability to manage our operations and future
growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls,
reporting systems and procedures. We may not be able to implement improvements to our management
information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in
existing systems and controls.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of system failures.
Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of
our contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized
access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. Such
events could cause interruption of our operations. For example, the loss of pre-clinical trial data
or data from completed or ongoing clinical trials for our product candidates could result in delays
in our regulatory filings and development efforts and significantly increase our costs. To the
extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of or damage to our data, or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and
the development of our product candidates could be delayed.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Risks Related to Development, Clinical Testing and Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates
Any product candidates we develop may fail in development or be delayed to a point where they do
not become commercially viable.
Before obtaining regulatory approval for the commercial distribution of our product
candidates, we must conduct, at our own expense, extensive pre-clinical tests and clinical trials
to demonstrate the safety and efficacy in humans of our product candidates. Pre-clinical and
clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete
and is uncertain as to outcome, and the historical failure rate for product candidates is high. We
currently have several programs in clinical development. We are developing ALN-RSV01 for the
treatment of RSV infection. In January 2008, we completed our GEMINI study, a Phase II clinical
trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and anti-viral activity of ALN-RSV01 in adult
subjects experimentally infected with RSV. During 2009, we completed a Phase IIa clinical trial
assessing the safety and tolerability of ALN-RSV01 in adult lung transplant patients naturally
infected with RSV. In February 2010, we initiated a Phase IIb clinical trial to evaluate the
clinical efficacy endpoints as well as safety of aerosolized ALN-RSV01 in adult lung transplant
patients naturally infected with RSV. The objective of this Phase IIb clinical trial is to repeat
and extend the clinical results observed in the Phase IIa clinical trial. In addition, in March
2009, we initiated a Phase I clinical trial of ALN-VSP, our first systemically delivered RNAi
therapeutic. We are developing ALN-VSP for the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancer. In
July 2010, we also initiated a Phase I clinical trial for ALN-TTR01, our second systemically
delivered RNAi therapeutic, which targets the TTR gene for the treatment of ATTR. In July 2011, we
filed a CTA with the MHRA to initiate a Phase I clinical trial of ALN-PCS for the treatment of
severe hypercholesteremia. However, we may not be able to further advance these or any other
product candidate through clinical trials.
If we enter into clinical trials, the results from pre-clinical testing or early clinical
trials of a product candidate may not predict the results that will be obtained in subsequent human
clinical trials of that product candidate or any other product candidate. For example, ALN-RSV01
may not demonstrate the same results in the Phase IIb clinical trial as it did in our Phase IIa
clinical trial. In addition, ALN-VSP, ALN-TTR01 and our other systemically delivered therapeutics,
such as ALN-PCS, employ novel delivery formulations that have yet to be extensively evaluated in
human clinical trials and proven safe and effective. We, the FDA or other applicable regulatory
authorities, or an institutional review board, or IRB, or similar foreign review board or
committee, may suspend clinical trials of a product candidate at any time for various reasons,
including if we or they believe the subjects or patients
38
participating in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. Among other
reasons, adverse side effects of a product candidate on subjects or patients in a clinical trial
could result in the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities suspending or terminating the trial and
refusing to approve a particular product candidate for any or all indications of use.
Clinical trials of a new product candidate require the enrollment of a sufficient number of
patients, including patients who are suffering from the disease the product candidate is intended
to treat and who meet other eligibility criteria. Rates of patient enrollment are affected by many
factors, including the size of the patient population, the age and condition of the patients, the
stage and severity of disease, the nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical
sites, the availability of effective treatments for the relevant disease, the seasonality of
infections and the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial. In our ALN-VSP clinical trial, one
patient with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer with extensive involvement of the liver
developed hepatic failure five days following the second dose of ALN-VSP and subsequently died;
this was deemed possibly related to the study drug. Six additional patients treated at the same
dose did not exhibit any evidence of hepatotoxicity. As of March 2011, the ALN-VSP clinical trial
had completed enrollment and a maximum tolerated dose was reached. In addition, our ALN-TTR01 trial
targets a small population of patients suffering from ATTR. Delays or difficulties in patient
enrollment or difficulties retaining trial participants can result in increased costs, longer
development times or termination of a clinical trial.
Clinical trials also require the review and oversight of IRBs, which approve and continually
review clinical investigations and protect the rights and welfare of human subjects. Inability to
obtain or delay in obtaining IRB approval can prevent or delay the initiation and completion of
clinical trials, and the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities may decide not to consider any data
or information derived from a clinical investigation not subject to initial and continuing IRB
review and approval in support of a marketing application.
Our product candidates that we develop may encounter problems during clinical trials that will
cause us, an IRB or regulatory authorities to delay, suspend or terminate these trials, or that
will delay or confound the analysis of data from these trials. If we experience any such problems,
we may not have the financial resources to continue development of the product candidate that is
affected, or development of any of our other product candidates. We may also lose, or be unable to
enter into, collaborative arrangements for the affected product candidate and for other product
candidates we are developing.
A failure of one of more of our clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. We may
experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, pre-clinical testing and the
clinical trial process that could delay or prevent regulatory approval or our ability to
commercialize our product candidates, including:
|
|
|
our pre-clinical tests or clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive
results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional
pre-clinical testing or clinical trials, or we may abandon projects that we expect to be
promising; |
|
|
|
|
delays in filing INDs or comparable foreign applications or delays or failure in
obtaining the necessary approvals from regulators or IRBs in order to commence a
clinical trial at a prospective trial site, or their suspension or termination of a
clinical trial once commenced; |
|
|
|
|
conditions imposed on us by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities regarding
the scope or design of our clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
problems in engaging IRBs to oversee clinical trials or problems in obtaining or
maintaining IRB approval of trials; |
|
|
|
|
delays in enrolling patients and volunteers into clinical trials, and variability
in the number and types of patients and volunteers available for clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
high drop-out rates for patients and volunteers in clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
negative or inconclusive results from our clinical trials or the clinical trials
of others for product candidates similar to ours; |
|
|
|
|
inadequate supply or quality of product candidate materials or other materials
necessary for the conduct of our clinical trials; |
39
|
|
|
greater than anticipated clinical trial costs; |
|
|
|
|
serious and unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by participants in
our clinical trials or by individuals using drugs similar to our product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
poor effectiveness of our product candidates during clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
unfavorable FDA or other regulatory agency inspection and review of a clinical
trial site or records of any clinical or pre-clinical investigation; |
|
|
|
|
failure of our third-party contractors or investigators to comply with regulatory
requirements or otherwise meet their contractual obligations in a timely manner, or at
all; |
|
|
|
|
governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy
and guidelines, including the imposition of additional regulatory oversight around
clinical testing generally or with respect to our technology in particular; or |
|
|
|
|
varying interpretations of data by the FDA and similar foreign regulatory agencies. |
Even if we successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates, any given product
candidate may not prove to be a safe and effective treatment for the diseases for which it was
being tested.
The regulatory approval process may be delayed for any products we develop that require the use
of specialized drug delivery devices, which may require us to incur additional costs and delay
receipt of any potential product revenue.
Some product candidates that we develop may need to be administered using specialized drug
delivery devices that deliver RNAi therapeutics directly to diseased parts of the body. For
example, we believe that product candidates we develop for HD or other central
nervous system diseases may need to be administered using such a device. For neurodegenerative
diseases, we have entered into a collaboration agreement with Medtronic to pursue potential
development of drug-device combinations incorporating RNAi therapeutics. We may not achieve
successful development results under this collaboration and may need to seek other collaborations
to develop alternative drug delivery systems, or utilize existing drug delivery systems, for the
direct delivery of RNAi therapeutics for these diseases. While we expect to rely on drug delivery
systems that have been approved by the FDA or other regulatory agencies to deliver drugs like ours
to diseased parts of the body, we, or our collaborator, may need to modify the design or labeling
of such delivery device for some products we may develop. In such an event, the FDA may regulate
the product as a combination product or require additional approvals or clearances for the modified
delivery device. Further, to the extent the specialized delivery device is owned by another
company, we would need that companys cooperation to implement the necessary changes to the device,
or its labeling, and to obtain any additional approvals or clearances. In cases where we do not
have an ongoing collaboration with the company that makes the device, obtaining such additional
approvals or clearances and the cooperation of such other company could significantly delay and
increase the cost of obtaining marketing approval, which could reduce the commercial viability of
our product candidate. In addition, the use of a specialized delivery system, even if previously
approved, could complicate the design or analysis of clinical trials for our RNAi therapeutics. In
summary, we may be unable to find, or experience delays in finding, suitable drug delivery systems
to administer RNAi therapeutics directly to diseased parts of the body, which could negatively
affect our ability to successfully commercialize these RNAi therapeutics.
We may be unable to obtain United States or foreign regulatory approval and, as a result, be
unable to commercialize our product candidates.
Our product candidates are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to, among
other things, research, testing, development, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, approval,
recordkeeping, reporting, labeling, storage, marketing and distribution of drugs. Rigorous
pre-clinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory approval process are required
to be successfully completed in the United States and in many foreign jurisdictions before a new
drug can be marketed. Satisfaction of these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time
consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. It is possible that none of the product
candidates we may develop will obtain the regulatory approvals necessary for us or our
collaborators to begin selling them.
We have very limited experience in conducting and managing the clinical trials necessary to
obtain regulatory approvals, including approval by the FDA. The time required to obtain FDA and
other approvals is unpredictable but typically takes many years
40
following the commencement of clinical trials, depending upon the type, complexity and novelty
of the product candidate. The standards that the FDA and its foreign counterparts use when
regulating us are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. Any analysis we
perform of data from pre-clinical and clinical activities is subject to confirmation and
interpretation by regulatory authorities, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval.
We may also encounter unexpected delays or increased costs due to new government regulations, for
example, from future legislation or administrative action, or from changes in FDA policy during the
period of product development, clinical trials and FDA regulatory review. It is impossible to
predict whether legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA or foreign regulations,
guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.
Because the drugs we are developing may represent a new class of drug, the FDA and its foreign
counterparts have not yet established any definitive policies, practices or guidelines in relation
to these drugs. While we believe the product candidates that we are currently developing are
regulated as new drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the FDA could decide to
regulate them or other products we may develop as biologics under the Public Health Service Act.
The lack of policies, practices or guidelines may hinder or slow review by the FDA of any
regulatory filings that we may submit. Moreover, the FDA may respond to these submissions by
defining requirements we may not have anticipated. Such responses could lead to significant delays
in the clinical development of our product candidates. In addition, because there may be approved
treatments for some of the diseases for which we may seek approval, in order to receive regulatory
approval, we may need to demonstrate through clinical trials that the product candidates we develop
to treat these diseases, if any, are not only safe and effective, but safer or more effective than
existing products. Furthermore, in recent years, there has been increased public and political
pressure on the FDA with respect to the approval process for new drugs, and the number of approvals
to market new drugs has declined.
Any delay or failure in obtaining required approvals could have a material adverse effect on
our ability to generate revenues from the particular product candidate for which we are seeking
approval. Furthermore, any regulatory approval to market a product may be subject to limitations on
the approved uses for which we may market the product or the labeling or other restrictions. In
addition, the FDA has the authority to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies, or
REMS, plan as part of an NDA or after approval, which may impose further requirements or
restrictions on the distribution or use of an approved drug or biologic, such as limiting
prescribing to certain physicians or medical centers that have undergone specialized training,
limiting treatment to patients who meet certain safe-use criteria and requiring treated patients to
enroll in a registry. These limitations and restrictions may limit the size of the market for the
product and affect reimbursement by third-party payors.
We are also subject to numerous foreign regulatory requirements governing, among other things,
the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing authorization, pricing and third-party
reimbursement. The foreign regulatory approval process varies among countries and includes all of
the risks associated with FDA approval described above as well as risks attributable to the
satisfaction of local regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Approval by the FDA does not ensure
approval by regulatory authorities outside the United States and vice versa.
Even if we obtain regulatory approvals, our marketed drugs will be subject to ongoing regulatory
review. If we fail to comply with continuing U.S. and foreign requirements, our approvals could
be limited or withdrawn, we could be subject to other penalties, and our business would be
seriously harmed.
Following any initial regulatory approval of any drugs we may develop, we will also be subject
to continuing regulatory review, including the review of adverse drug experiences and clinical
results that are reported after our drug products are made commercially available. This would
include results from any post-marketing tests or surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of
the drug product required as a condition of approval or agreed to by us. Any regulatory approvals
that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved uses
for which the product may be marketed. Other ongoing regulatory requirements include, among other
things, submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as
well as continued compliance with cGMP requirements and good clinical practices for any clinical
trials that we conduct post-approval. In addition, we are conducting, and intend to continue to
conduct, clinical trials for our product candidates, and we intend to seek approval to market our
product candidates, in jurisdictions outside of the United States, and therefore will be subject
to, and must comply with, regulatory requirements in those jurisdictions.
The FDA has significant post-market authority, including, for example, the authority to
require labeling changes based on new safety information and to require post-market studies or
clinical trials to evaluate serious safety risks related to the use of a drug and to require
withdrawal of the product from the market. The FDA also has the authority to require a REMS plan
after approval, which may impose further requirements or restrictions on the distribution or use of
an approved drug.
41
The manufacturer and manufacturing facilities we use to make any of our product candidates
will also be subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA and other regulatory agencies.
The discovery of any new or previously unknown problems with our third-party manufacturers,
manufacturing processes or facilities, may result in restrictions on the drug or manufacturer or
facility, including withdrawal of the drug from the market. We do not have, and currently do not
intend to develop, the ability to manufacture material for our clinical trials or on a commercial
scale. We may manufacture clinical trial materials or we may contract a third party to manufacture
these materials for us. Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not
be subject if we manufactured products ourselves, including reliance on the third-party
manufacturer for regulatory compliance. Our product promotion and advertising is also subject to
regulatory requirements and continuing regulatory review.
If we or our collaborators, manufacturers or service providers fail to comply with applicable
continuing regulatory requirements in the United States or foreign jurisdictions in which we may
seek to market our products, we or they may be subject to, among other things, fines, warning
letters, holds on clinical trials, refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications or
supplements to approved applications, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approval, product
recalls and seizures, refusal to permit the import or export of products, operating restrictions,
injunction, civil penalties and criminal prosecution.
Even if we receive regulatory approval to market our product candidates, the market may not be
receptive to our product candidates upon their commercial introduction, which will prevent us
from becoming profitable.
The product candidates that we are developing are based upon new technologies or therapeutic
approaches. Key participants in pharmaceutical marketplaces, such as physicians, third-party payors
and consumers, may not accept a product intended to improve therapeutic results based on RNAi
technology. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to convince the medical community and
third-party payors to accept and use our product, or to provide favorable reimbursement.
Other factors that we believe will materially affect market acceptance of our product
candidates include:
|
|
|
the timing of our receipt of any marketing approvals, the terms of any approvals
and the countries in which approvals are obtained; |
|
|
|
|
the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, as demonstrated in clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
relative convenience and ease of administration of our product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
the willingness of patients to accept potentially new routes of administration; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our physician education programs; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of adequate government and third-party payor reimbursement; |
|
|
|
|
the pricing of our products, particularly as compared to alternative treatments; and |
|
|
|
|
availability of alternative effective treatments for the diseases that product
candidates we develop are intended to treat and the relative risks, benefits and costs
of the treatments. |
If we or our collaborators, manufacturers or service providers fail to comply with healthcare
laws and regulations, we or they could be subject to enforcement actions, which could affect our
ability to develop, market and sell our products and may harm our reputation.
As a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, we are subject to federal, state, and foreign healthcare
laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients rights. These laws and regulations
include:
|
|
|
the U.S. federal healthcare program anti-kickback law, which prohibits, among
other things, persons from soliciting, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or
indirectly, to induce either the referral of an individual for a healthcare item or
service, or the purchasing or ordering of an item or service, for which payment may be
made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid; |
42
|
|
|
the U.S. federal false claims law, which prohibits, among other things,
individuals or entities from knowingly presenting or causing to be presented, claims for
payment by government funded programs such as Medicare or Medicaid that are false or
fraudulent, and which may apply to us by virtue of statements and representations made
to customers or third parties; |
|
|
|
|
the U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA,
and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health, or HITECH, Act,
which prohibit executing a scheme to defraud healthcare programs; impose requirements
relating to the privacy, security, and transmission of individually identifiable health
information; and require notification to affected individuals and regulatory authorities
of certain breaches of security of individually identifiable health information; and |
|
|
|
|
state laws comparable to each of the above federal laws, such as, for example,
anti-kickback and false claims laws applicable to commercial insurers and other
non-federal payors, requirements for mandatory corporate regulatory compliance programs,
and laws relating to patient data privacy and security. |
If our operations are found to be in violation of any such requirements, we may be subject to
penalties, including civil or criminal penalties, monetary damages, the curtailment or
restructuring of our operations, loss of eligibility to obtain approvals from the FDA, or exclusion
from participation in government contracting or other government programs, including Medicare and
Medicaid, any of which could adversely our financial results. Although effective compliance
programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and prosecution for violations of these laws, these
risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Any action against us for an alleged or suspected violation
could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and could divert our managements attention from
the operation of our business, even if our defense is successful. In addition, achieving and
sustaining compliance with applicable laws and regulations may be costly to us in terms of money,
time and resources.
If we or our collaborators, manufacturers or service providers fail to comply with applicable
federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, we could be subject to enforcement actions, which
could affect our ability to develop, market and sell our products successfully and could harm our
reputation and lead to reduced acceptance of our products by the market. These enforcement actions
include, among others:
|
|
|
adverse regulatory inspection findings; |
|
|
|
|
warning letters; |
|
|
|
|
voluntary or mandatory product recalls or public notification or medical product
safety alerts to healthcare professionals; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on, or prohibitions against, marketing our products; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on, or prohibitions against, importation or exportation of our products; |
|
|
|
|
suspension of review or refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to
approved applications; |
|
|
|
|
exclusion from participation in government-funded healthcare programs; |
|
|
|
|
exclusion from eligibility for the award of government contracts for our products; |
|
|
|
|
suspension or withdrawal of product approvals; |
|
|
|
|
product seizures; |
|
|
|
|
injunctions; and |
|
|
|
|
civil and criminal penalties and fines. |
Any drugs we develop may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party
reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives, thereby harming our business.
43
The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing and reimbursement for new drugs vary
widely from country to country. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before
it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product
licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains
subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. Although we
intend to monitor these regulations, our programs are currently in the early stages of development
and we will not be able to assess the impact of price regulations for a number of years. As a
result, we might obtain regulatory approval for a product in a particular country, but then be
subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product and negatively impact
the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country.
Our ability to commercialize any products successfully also will depend in part on the extent
to which reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government
health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Even if we
succeed in bringing one or more products to the market, these products may not be considered
cost-effective, and the amount reimbursed for any products may be insufficient to allow us to sell
our products on a competitive basis. Because our programs are in the early stages of development,
we are unable at this time to determine their cost effectiveness or the likely level or method of
reimbursement. Increasingly, the third-party payors who reimburse patients, such as government and
private insurance plans, are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined
discounts from list prices, and are seeking to reduce the prices charged for pharmaceutical
products. If the price we are able to charge for any products we develop is inadequate in light of
our development and other costs, our profitability could be adversely affected.
We currently expect that any drugs we develop may need to be administered under the
supervision of a physician. Under currently applicable U.S. law, drugs that are not usually
self-administered may be eligible for coverage by the Medicare program if:
|
|
|
they are incident to a physicians services; |
|
|
|
|
they are reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of the illness
or injury for which they are administered according to accepted standards of medical
practice; |
|
|
|
|
they are not excluded as immunizations; and |
|
|
|
|
they have been approved by the FDA. |
There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage for newly-approved drugs, and coverage
may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the FDA. Moreover,
eligibility for coverage does not imply that any drug will be reimbursed in all cases or at a rate
that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim
payments for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be
made permanent. Reimbursement may be based on payments allowed for lower-cost drugs that are
already reimbursed, may be incorporated into existing payments for other services and may reflect
budgetary constraints or imperfections in Medicare data. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by
mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by
any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they
may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare
coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. Our inability to
promptly obtain coverage and profitable reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private
payors for new drugs that we develop and for which we obtain regulatory approval could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to
commercialize products, and our overall financial condition.
We believe that the efforts of governments and third-party payors to contain or reduce the
cost of healthcare and legislative and regulatory proposals to broaden the availability of
healthcare will continue to affect the business and financial condition of pharmaceutical and
biopharmaceutical companies. A number of legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare
system in the United States and other major healthcare markets have been proposed in recent years,
and such efforts have expanded substantially in recent years. These developments have included
prescription drug benefit legislation that was enacted and took effect in January 2006, healthcare
reform legislation enacted by certain states, and major healthcare reform legislation that
was passed by Congress and enacted into law in the United States in 2010. These developments could,
directly or indirectly, affect our ability to sell our products, if approved, at a favorable price.
In particular, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA, and a
related reconciliation bill were signed into law. This new legislation changes the current system
of healthcare insurance and benefits intended to broaden
44
coverage and control costs. The new law also contains provisions that will affect companies in
the pharmaceutical industry and other healthcare related industries by imposing additional costs
and changes to business practices. Provisions affecting pharmaceutical companies include the
following:
|
|
|
Mandatory rebates for drugs sold into the Medicaid program have been increased,
and the rebate requirement has been extended to drugs used in risk-based Medicaid
managed care plans. |
|
|
|
|
The 340B Drug Pricing Program under the Public Health Services Act has been
extended to require mandatory discounts for drug products sold to certain critical
access hospitals, cancer hospitals and other covered entities. |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical companies are required to offer discounts on brand-name drugs to
patients who fall within the Medicare Part D coverage gap, commonly referred to as the
Donut Hole. |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical companies are required to pay an annual non-tax deductible fee to
the federal government based on each companys market share of prior year total sales of
branded products to certain federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid,
Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. The aggregated industry-wide
fee is expected to total $28 billion through 2019, of which $2.5 billion will be payable
in 2011. Since we expect our branded pharmaceutical sales to constitute a small portion
of the total federal health program pharmaceutical market, we do not expect this annual
assessment to have a material impact on our financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
The new law provides that biologic products may receive 12 years of market
exclusivity, with a possible six-month extension for pediatric products. After this
exclusivity ends, generic manufacturers will be permitted to enter the market, which is
likely to reduce the pricing for such products and could affect the companys
profitability. In addition, generic manufacturers will be permitted to challenge one or
more of the patents for a branded drug after a product is marketed for four years. |
The full effects of the U.S. healthcare reform legislation cannot be known until the new law
is implemented through regulations or guidance issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services and other federal and state healthcare agencies. The financial impact of the U.S.
healthcare reform legislation over the next few years will depend on a number of factors, including
but not limited, to the policies reflected in implementing regulations and guidance, and changes in
sales volumes for products affected by the new system of rebates, discounts and fees. The new
legislation may also have a positive impact on our future net sales, if any, by increasing the
aggregate number of persons with healthcare coverage in the United States, but such increases are
unlikely to be realized until approximately 2014 at the earliest.
Moreover, we cannot predict what healthcare reform initiatives may be adopted in the future.
Further federal and state legislative and regulatory developments are likely, and we expect ongoing
initiatives in the United States to increase pressure on drug pricing. Such reforms could have an
adverse effect on anticipated revenues from product candidates that we may successfully develop and
for which we may obtain regulatory approval and may affect our overall financial condition and
ability to develop drug candidates.
There is a substantial risk of product liability claims in our business. If we are unable to
obtain sufficient insurance, a product liability claim against us could adversely affect our
business.
Our business exposes us to significant potential product liability risks that are inherent in
the development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of human therapeutic products. Product
liability claims could delay or prevent completion of our clinical development programs. If we
succeed in marketing products, such claims could result in an FDA investigation of the safety and
effectiveness of our products, our manufacturing processes and facilities or our marketing
programs, and potentially a recall of our products or more serious enforcement action, limitations
on the approved indications for which they may be used, or suspension or withdrawal of approvals.
Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may also result in injury to our
reputation, costs to defend the related litigation, a diversion of managements time and our
resources, and substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients. We currently have
product liability insurance that we believe is appropriate for our stage of development and may
need to obtain higher levels prior to marketing any of our product candidates. Any insurance we
have or may obtain may not provide sufficient coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore,
clinical trial and product liability insurance is becoming increasingly expensive. As a result, we
may be unable to obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses
caused by product liability claims that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
45
If we do not comply with laws regulating the protection of the environment and health and human
safety, our business could be adversely affected.
Our research and development involves the use of hazardous materials, chemicals and various
radioactive compounds. We maintain quantities of various flammable and toxic chemicals in our
facilities in Cambridge that are required for our research and development activities. We are
subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage,
handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. We believe our procedures for storing, handling
and disposing these materials in our Cambridge facility comply with the relevant guidelines of the
City of Cambridge and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Although we believe that our safety
procedures for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards mandated by
applicable regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot
be eliminated. If an accident occurs, we could be held liable for resulting damages, which could be
substantial. We are also subject to numerous environmental, health and workplace safety laws and
regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures, exposure to blood-borne pathogens and
the handling of biohazardous materials.
Although we maintain workers compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may
incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of these materials, this insurance
may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for
environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our
storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials. Additional federal, state
and local laws and regulations affecting our operations may be adopted in the future. We may incur
substantial costs to comply with, and substantial fines or penalties if we violate, any of these
laws or regulations.
Risks Related to Patents, Licenses and Trade Secrets
If we are not able to obtain and enforce patent protection for our discoveries, our ability to
develop and commercialize our product candidates will be harmed.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies
that we develop under the patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States and
other countries, so that we can prevent others from unlawfully using our inventions and proprietary
information. However, we may not hold proprietary rights to some patents required for us to
commercialize our proposed products. Because certain U.S. patent applications are confidential
until the patents issue, such as applications filed prior to November 29, 2000, or applications
filed after such date which will not be filed in foreign countries, third parties may have filed
patent applications for technology covered by our pending patent applications without our being
aware of those applications, and our patent applications may not have priority over those
applications. For this and other reasons, we may be unable to secure desired patent rights, thereby
losing desired exclusivity. Further, we may be required to obtain licenses under third-party
patents to market our proposed products or conduct our research and development or other
activities. If licenses are not available to us on acceptable terms, we will not be able to market
the affected products or conduct the desired activities.
Our strategy depends on our ability to rapidly identify and seek patent protection for our
discoveries. In addition, we may rely on third-party collaborators to file patent applications
relating to proprietary technology that we develop jointly during certain collaborations. The
process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming. If our present or future
collaborators fail to file and prosecute all necessary and desirable patent applications at a
reasonable cost and in a timely manner, our business will be adversely affected. Despite our
efforts and the efforts of our collaborators to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized
parties may be able to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. While issued
patents are presumed valid, this does not guarantee that the patent will survive a validity
challenge or be held enforceable. Any patents we have obtained, or obtain in the future, may be
challenged, invalidated, adjudged unenforceable or circumvented by parties attempting to design
around our intellectual property. Moreover, third parties or the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, or USPTO, may commence interference proceedings involving our patents or patent
applications. For example, the USPTO has declared an interference between our issued
patent covering ALN-VSP, our RNAi therapeutic undergoing clinical testing for the treatment of
liver cancers, and a pending third-party application. Any challenge to, finding of
unenforceability or invalidation or circumvention of, our patents or patent applications, would be
costly, would require significant time and attention of our management and could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Our pending patent applications may not result in issued patents. The patent position of
pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, including ours, is generally uncertain and involves
complex legal and factual considerations. The standards that the USPTO and its foreign counterparts
use to grant patents are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. Similarly, the
ultimate degree of protection that will be afforded to biotechnology inventions, including ours, in
the United States and foreign countries, remains uncertain and is dependent upon the scope of the
protection decided upon by patent offices, courts and lawmakers.
46
Moreover, there are periodic discussions in the Congress of the United States and in
international jurisdictions about modifying various aspects of patent law. If any such changes are
enacted and do not provide adequate protection for discoveries, including our ability to pursue
infringers of our patents for substantial damages, our business could be adversely affected. There
is also no uniform, worldwide policy regarding the subject matter and scope of claims granted or
allowable in pharmaceutical or biotechnology patents. Accordingly, we do not know the degree of
future protection for our proprietary rights or the breadth of claims that will be allowed in any
patents issued to us or to others.
We also rely to a certain extent on trade secrets, know-how and technology, which are not
protected by patents, to maintain our competitive position. If any trade secret, know-how or other
technology not protected by a patent were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a
competitor, our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We license patent rights from third-party owners. If such owners do not properly or successfully
obtain, maintain or enforce the patents underlying such licenses, our competitive position and
business prospects will be harmed.
We are a party to a number of licenses that give us rights to third-party intellectual
property that is necessary or useful for our business. In particular, we have obtained licenses
from, among others, CRT, Isis, MIT, Whitehead, Max Planck, Stanford, Tekmira and UTSW. We also
intend to enter into additional licenses to third-party intellectual property in the future.
Our success will depend in part on the ability of our licensors to obtain, maintain and
enforce patent protection for our licensed intellectual property, in particular, those patents to
which we have secured exclusive rights. Our licensors may not successfully prosecute the patent
applications to which we are licensed. Even if patents issue in respect of these patent
applications, our licensors may fail to maintain these patents, may determine not to pursue
litigation against other companies that are infringing these patents, or may pursue such litigation
less aggressively than we would. Without protection for the intellectual property we license, other
companies might be able to offer substantially identical products for sale, which could adversely
affect our competitive business position and harm our business prospects. In addition, we
sublicense our rights under various third-party licenses to our collaborators. Any impairment of
these sublicensed rights could result in reduced revenues under our collaboration agreements or
result in termination of an agreement by one or more of our collaborators.
Other companies or organizations may challenge our patent rights or may assert patent rights
that prevent us from developing and commercializing our products.
RNAi is a relatively new scientific field, the commercial exploitation of which has resulted
in many different patents and patent applications from organizations and individuals seeking to
obtain patent protection in the field. We have obtained grants and issuances of RNAi patents and
have licensed many of these patents from third parties on an exclusive basis. The issued patents
and pending patent applications in the United States and in key markets around the world that we
own or license claim many different methods, compositions and processes relating to the discovery,
development, manufacture and commercialization of RNAi therapeutics.
Specifically, we have a portfolio of patents, patent applications and other intellectual
property covering: fundamental aspects of the structure and uses of siRNAs, including their
manufacture and use as therapeutics, and RNAi-related mechanisms; chemical modifications to siRNAs
that improve their suitability for therapeutic uses; siRNAs directed to specific targets as
treatments for particular diseases; and delivery technologies, such as in the field of cationic
liposomes.
As the field of RNAi therapeutics is maturing, patent applications are being fully processed
by national patent offices around the world. There is uncertainty about which patents will issue,
and, if they do, as to when, to whom, and with what claims. It is likely that there will be
significant litigation and other proceedings, such as interference, reexamination and opposition
proceedings, in various patent offices relating to patent rights in the RNAi field. For example,
various third parties have initiated oppositions to patents in our Kreutzer-Limmer and Tuschl II
series in the EPO and in other jurisdictions. We expect that additional oppositions will be filed
in the EPO and elsewhere, and other challenges will be raised relating to other patents and patent
applications in our portfolio. In many cases, the possibility of appeal exists for either us or our
opponents, and it may be years before final, unappealable rulings are made with respect to these
patents in certain jurisdictions. The timing and outcome of these and other proceedings is
uncertain and may adversely affect our business if we are not successful in defending the
patentability and scope of our pending and issued patent claims. In addition, third parties may
attempt to invalidate our intellectual property rights. Even if our rights are not directly
challenged, disputes could lead to the weakening of our intellectual property rights. Our defense
against any attempt by third parties to circumvent or invalidate our intellectual property rights
could be costly to us, could require significant time and attention of our management and could
have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to successfully compete in the field
of RNAi.
47
There are many issued and pending patents that claim aspects of oligonucleotide chemistry that
we may need to apply to our siRNA therapeutic candidates. There are also many issued patents that
claim targeting genes or portions of genes that may be relevant for siRNA drugs we wish to develop.
Thus, it is possible that one or more organizations will hold patent rights to which we will need a
license. If those organizations refuse to grant us a license to such patent rights on reasonable
terms, we may not be able to market products or perform research and development or other
activities covered by these patents.
If we become involved in patent litigation or other proceedings related to a determination of
rights, we could incur substantial costs and expenses, substantial liability for damages or be
required to stop our product development and commercialization efforts.
Third parties may sue us for infringing their patent rights. Likewise, we may need to resort
to litigation to enforce a patent issued or licensed to us or to determine the scope and validity
of proprietary rights of others. In addition, a third party may claim that we have improperly
obtained or used its confidential or proprietary information. For example, in March 2011, Tekmira
and Protiva filed a civil complaint in the Business Litigation Section of the Suffolk County
Superior Court, in Boston, Massachusetts against us and on June 3, 2011, the plaintiffs filed an
amended complaint adding AlCana, a research collaborator of ours, as a defendant. The amended
complaint alleges misappropriation of the plaintiffs confidential and proprietary information and
trade secrets, civil conspiracy, and tortious interference with contractual relationships by us and
AlCana, and unjust enrichment, contractual breach, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and
fair dealing, unfair competition, false advertising, unfair and deceptive trade practices by us,
and seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages and other relief. In April 2011, we served and
filed an answer to the plaintiffs original complaint denying the plaintiffs claims in this
action, together with counterclaims against the plaintiffs. In June 2011, we served and filed an
answer to the plaintiffs amended complaint denying the plaintiffs claims and counterclaims
against the plaintiffs asserting breach of contract, defamation, breach of covenant not to sue,
breach of patent prosecution and non-use provisions, misappropriation of confidential and
proprietary information and trade secrets, unjust enrichment, breach of the implied covenant of
good faith and fair dealing, as well as violations of Massachusetts statutes. We are seeking the
dismissal of the plaintiffs claims and judgment in our favor, as well as damages and equitable
relief. Although we believe we have meritorious defenses to each of the claims in this lawsuit and
intend to fully defend ourselves in this matter, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainty and
a court could ultimately rule against us and award substantial damages. In addition, defense of
litigation and related matters are costly and may divert the attention of our management and other
resources that would otherwise be engaged in running our business.
Furthermore, third parties may challenge the inventorship of our patents or licensed patents.
For example, in March 2011, the University of Utah filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Massachusetts against us, Max Planck, Whitehead, MIT and UMass, claiming
that a professor of the University is the sole inventor, or in the alternative, a joint inventor of
certain of our in-licensed patents. The original complaint was not served on any of the parties
and, in July 2011, the University filed an amended complaint containing substantially the same
claims as the original complaint against us, Max Planck, Whitehead, MIT and UMass. The amended
complaint alleges the defendants have incorrectly determined inventorship of some of our
in-licensed patents and further claims unjust enrichment, unfair competition, false advertising and
seeks correction of inventorship, injunctive relief and unspecified damages. We believe we have
meritorious defenses against each of the claims in this lawsuit and intend to fully defend
ourselves in this matter if the complaint is served. However, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainty and a court could ultimately rule against us.
In addition, in connection with a license agreement, we agreed to indemnify the licensor for
costs incurred in connection with litigation relating to intellectual property rights. The cost to
us of any litigation or other proceeding relating to intellectual property rights, even if resolved
in our favor, could be substantial, and the litigation would divert our managements efforts. Some
of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively
than we can because they have substantially greater resources. Uncertainties resulting from the
initiation and continuation of any litigation could delay our research and development efforts and
limit our ability to continue our operations.
If any parties successfully claim that our creation or use of proprietary technologies
infringes upon their intellectual property rights, we might be forced to pay damages, potentially
including treble damages, if we are found to have willfully infringed on such parties patent
rights. In addition to any damages we might have to pay, a court could require us to stop the
infringing activity or obtain a license. Any license required under any patent may not be made
available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, such licenses are likely to be
non-exclusive and, therefore, our competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to
us. If we fail to obtain a required license and are unable to design around a patent, we may be
unable to effectively market some of our technology and products, which could limit our ability to
generate revenues or achieve profitability and possibly prevent us from generating revenue
sufficient to sustain our operations. Moreover, we expect that a number of our collaborations will
provide that royalties payable to us for licenses to our intellectual property may be offset by
amounts paid by our collaborators to third parties who have competing or superior intellectual
property positions in the relevant fields, which could result in significant reductions in our
revenues from products developed through collaborations.
48
If we fail to comply with our obligations under any licenses or related agreements, we could
lose license rights that are necessary for developing and protecting our RNAi technology and any
related product candidates that we develop, or we could lose certain exclusive rights to grant
sublicenses.
Our current licenses impose, and any future licenses we enter into are likely to impose,
various development, commercialization, funding, royalty, diligence, sublicensing, insurance and
other obligations on us. If we breach any of these obligations, the licensor may have the right to
terminate the license or render the license non-exclusive, which could result in us being unable to
develop, manufacture and sell products that are covered by the licensed technology or enable a
competitor to gain access to the licensed technology. In addition, while we cannot currently
determine the amount of the royalty obligations we will be required to pay on sales of future
products, if any, the amounts may be significant. The amount of our future royalty obligations will
depend on the technology and intellectual property we use in products that we successfully develop
and commercialize, if any. Therefore, even if we successfully develop and commercialize products,
we may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability.
Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of
trade secrets and other proprietary information.
In order to protect our proprietary technology and processes, we rely in part on
confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees, consultants, outside scientific
collaborators and sponsored researchers, and other advisors. These agreements may not effectively
prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event
of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, others may independently
discover trade secrets and proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade
secret rights against such party. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to
enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade
secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.
Risks Related to Competition
The pharmaceutical market is intensely competitive. If we are unable to compete effectively with
existing drugs, new treatment methods and new technologies, we may be unable to commercialize
successfully any drugs that we develop.
The pharmaceutical market is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. Many large
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and other
public and private research organizations are pursuing the development of novel drugs for the same
diseases that we are targeting or expect to target. Many of our competitors have:
|
|
|
much greater financial, technical and human resources than we have at every stage
of the discovery, development, manufacture and commercialization of products; |
|
|
|
|
more extensive experience in pre-clinical testing, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals, and in manufacturing, marketing and selling
pharmaceutical products; |
|
|
|
|
product candidates that are based on previously tested or accepted technologies; |
|
|
|
|
products that have been approved or are in late stages of development; and |
|
|
|
|
collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research
institutions. |
We will face intense competition from drugs that have already been approved and accepted by
the medical community for the treatment of the conditions for which we may develop drugs. We also
expect to face competition from new drugs that enter the market. We believe a significant number of
drugs are currently under development, and may become commercially available in the future, for the
treatment of conditions for which we may try to develop drugs. For instance, we are currently
evaluating RNAi therapeutics for ATTR, severe hypercholesterolemia, refractory anemia, RSV, liver
cancers and HD, and have a number of additional discovery programs targeting other diseases. These
drugs may be more effective, safer, less expensive, or marketed and sold more effectively, than any
products we develop.
If we successfully develop product candidates, and obtain approval for them, we will face
competition based on many different factors, including:
49
|
|
|
the safety and effectiveness of our products; |
|
|
|
|
the ease with which our products can be administered and the extent to which
patients accept relatively new routes of administration; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and scope of regulatory approvals for these products; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
price; |
|
|
|
|
reimbursement coverage; and |
|
|
|
|
patent position. |
Our competitors may develop or commercialize products with significant advantages over any
products we develop based on any of the factors listed above or on other factors. Our competitors
may therefore be more successful in commercializing their products than we are, which could
adversely affect our competitive position and business. Competitive products may make any products
we develop obsolete or noncompetitive before we can recover the expenses of developing and
commercializing our product candidates. Such competitors could also recruit our employees, which
could negatively impact our level of expertise and the ability to execute on our business plan.
Furthermore, we also face competition from existing and new treatment methods that reduce or
eliminate the need for drugs, such as the use of advanced medical devices. The development of new
medical devices or other treatment methods for the diseases we are targeting could make our product
candidates noncompetitive, obsolete or uneconomical.
We face competition from other companies that are working to develop novel drugs and technology
platforms using technology similar to ours. If these companies develop drugs more rapidly than
we do or their technologies, including delivery technologies, are more effective, our ability to
successfully commercialize drugs may be adversely affected.
In addition to the competition we face from competing drugs in general, we also face
competition from other companies working to develop novel drugs using technology that competes more
directly with our own. We are aware of multiple companies that are working in the field of RNAi. In
addition, we granted licenses or options for licenses to Isis, GeneCare Research Institute Co.,
Ltd., Benitec Ltd., Calando Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tekmira, Quark Biotech, Inc. and others under
which these companies may independently develop RNAi therapeutics against a limited number of
targets. Any of these companies may develop its RNAi technology more rapidly and more effectively
than us. Merck & Co., Inc., or Merck, was one of our collaborators and a licensee under our
intellectual property for specified disease targets until September 2007, at which time we and
Merck agreed to terminate our collaboration. As a result of its acquisition of Sirna Therapeutics,
Inc. in December 2006, and in light of the mutual termination of our collaboration, Merck, which
has substantially more resources and experience in developing drugs than we do, may become a direct
competitor.
In addition, as a result of agreements that we have entered into, Roche and Takeda have
obtained non-exclusive licenses, and Novartis has obtained specific exclusive licenses for 31 gene
targets, to certain aspects of our technology that give them the right to compete with us in
certain circumstances.
We also compete with companies working to develop antisense-based drugs. Like RNAi
therapeutics, antisense drugs target messenger RNAs, or mRNAs, in order to suppress the activity of
specific genes. Isis is currently marketing an antisense drug and has several antisense product
candidates in clinical trials. The development of antisense drugs is more advanced than that of
RNAi therapeutics, and antisense technology may become the preferred technology for drugs that
target mRNAs to silence specific genes.
In addition to competition with respect to RNAi and with respect to specific products, we face
substantial competition to discover and develop safe and effective means to deliver siRNAs to the
relevant cell and tissue types. Safe and effective means to deliver siRNAs to the relevant cell and
tissue types may be developed by our competitors, and our ability to successfully commercialize a
competitive product would be adversely affected. In addition, substantial resources are being
expended by third parties in the effort to discover and develop a safe and effective means of
delivering siRNAs into the relevant cell and tissue types, both in academic laboratories and in the
corporate sector. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, and if
our competitors are able to negotiate exclusive access to those delivery solutions developed by
third parties, we may be unable
to successfully commercialize our product candidates.
50
Our Alnylam Biotherapeutics efforts will also face competition from established companies
developing and commercializing technology applications to improve the manufacturing processes for
drugs. If these companies advance and market their technologies more rapidly than Alnylam
Biotherapeutics, we may be unable to establish collaborations for Alnylam Biotherapeutics with
established biologic manufacturers, selling licenses, products and services.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
If our stock price fluctuates, purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
The market price of our common stock has and may continue to fluctuate significantly in
response to factors that are beyond our control. The stock market in general has recently
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The market prices of securities of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have been extremely volatile, and have experienced
fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
these companies. These broad market fluctuations could result in extreme fluctuations in the price
of our common stock, which could cause purchasers of our common stock to incur substantial losses.
We may incur significant costs from class action litigation due to our expected stock
volatility.
Our stock price may fluctuate for many reasons, including as a result of public announcements
regarding the progress of our development efforts or the development efforts of our collaborators
and/or competitors, the addition or departure of our key personnel, variations in our quarterly
operating results and changes in market valuations of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.
When the market price of a stock has been volatile as our stock price may be, holders of that stock
have occasionally brought securities class action litigation against the company that issued the
stock. If any of our stockholders were to bring a lawsuit of this type against us, even if the
lawsuit is without merit, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. The lawsuit could
also divert the time and attention of our management.
Novartis ownership of our common stock could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.
At June 30, 2011, Novartis held 13.1% of our outstanding common stock and has the right to
maintain its ownership percentage until the earlier of any sale by Novartis of shares of our common
stock and the expiration or termination of our collaboration and license agreement, subject to
certain exceptions. This concentration of ownership may harm the market price of our common stock
by:
|
|
|
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company; |
|
|
|
|
impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our
company; or |
|
|
|
|
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise
attempting to obtain control of our company. |
Sales of additional shares of our common stock could result in dilution to existing stockholders
and cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the availability of
such shares for sale, by us or others could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Novartis has rights, subject to certain conditions, to require us to file registration statements
covering its shares or to include its shares in registration statements that we file, including
the shelf registration statement we filed in July 2011. In addition, if Novartis decides to sell
a portion of its shares in a rapid or disorderly manner, our stock price could be negatively
impacted.
51
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law and our stockholder
rights plan could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more
difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current
management.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws may delay or prevent an
acquisition of us or a change in our management. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or
prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it
more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Because our board of
directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could
in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team.
These provisions include:
|
|
|
a classified board of directors; |
|
|
|
|
a prohibition on actions by our stockholders by written consent; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for election to our board of directors and for
proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings. |
In addition, our board of directors has adopted a stockholder rights plan, the provisions of
which could make it difficult for a potential acquirer of Alnylam to consummate an acquisition
transaction.
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of
15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years
after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding
voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner. These provisions
would apply even if the proposed merger or acquisition could be considered beneficial by some
stockholders.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
As we previously reported, in a non-binding advisory vote at our 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, a majority of the votes cast voted in favor of an annual advisory stockholder vote on
the compensation of our named executive officers. After taking into consideration these voting
results and our board of directors recommendation in favor of an annual advisory stockholder vote
on the compensation of our named executive officers, we intend to hold future advisory votes on the
compensation of our named executive officers every year.
52
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Sponsored Research Agreement dated as of July 27, 2009
by and among the Company, The University of British
Columbia and AlCana Technologies, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2011 (File No. 000-50743)
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Supplemental Agreement effective July 27, 2009 by and
among the Company, Tekmira Pharmaceuticals
Corporation, Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc., The
University of British Columbia and AlCana
Technologies, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June
29, 2011 (File No. 000-50743) and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
12#
|
|
Computation of Consolidated Ratios
of Earnings/Deficiencies to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
|
|
|
101+
|
|
The following materials from Registrants Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged
as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates confidential treatment requested as to certain portions,
which portions were omitted and filed separately with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request. |
|
# |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
+ |
|
Furnished herewith. |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
August 3, 2011
|
|
/s/ John M. Maraganore
John M. Maraganore, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 3, 2011
|
|
/s/ Michael P. Mason
Michael P. Mason
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
54