e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
1-33409
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-0836269 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2250 Lakeside Boulevard |
|
|
Richardson, Texas
|
|
75082-4304 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 570-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On July 31, 2008, there were 349,919,277 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par
value, outstanding.
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
|
|
* |
|
No reportable information under this item. |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,128,937 |
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
43,146 |
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for
uncollectible accounts of $3,533 and $2,908
at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
38,445 |
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
53,944 |
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
31,334 |
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
20,778 |
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,321,505 |
|
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,263,223 |
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
21,348 |
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
2,390,959 |
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,078,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
479,025 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
16,411 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
127,286 |
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
627,880 |
|
|
|
580,490 |
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
|
3,003,521 |
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
349,952 |
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
48,746 |
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
5,652 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
74,995 |
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,110,746 |
|
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares of preferred stock issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 349,898,967
and 348,108,027 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,553,234 |
|
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
428,395 |
|
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(13,631 |
) |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,968,033 |
|
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,078,779 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
598,562 |
|
|
$ |
479,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,532 |
|
|
$ |
918,857 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
80,245 |
|
|
|
71,835 |
|
|
|
180,629 |
|
|
|
169,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
678,807 |
|
|
|
551,176 |
|
|
|
1,341,161 |
|
|
|
1,087,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization expense of
$53,061, $36,653, $101,717 and $71,827, shown separately below) |
|
|
206,140 |
|
|
|
162,227 |
|
|
|
394,614 |
|
|
|
307,562 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
160,088 |
|
|
|
133,439 |
|
|
|
360,245 |
|
|
|
306,747 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization expense of $7,827, $4,471, $16,471 and $8,677,
shown separately below) |
|
|
113,419 |
|
|
|
82,717 |
|
|
|
217,793 |
|
|
|
155,654 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
60,888 |
|
|
|
41,124 |
|
|
|
118,188 |
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
543,163 |
|
|
|
419,114 |
|
|
|
1,093,489 |
|
|
|
853,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
135,644 |
|
|
|
132,062 |
|
|
|
247,672 |
|
|
|
234,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
45,664 |
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
|
|
93,083 |
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
49,688 |
|
|
|
34,928 |
|
|
|
95,529 |
|
|
|
76,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
85,956 |
|
|
|
97,134 |
|
|
|
152,143 |
|
|
|
157,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(35,491 |
) |
|
|
(39,040 |
) |
|
|
(62,159 |
) |
|
|
(63,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
50,465 |
|
|
|
58,094 |
|
|
|
89,984 |
|
|
|
94,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,499 |
) |
Accrued dividends on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
Accretion on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Accretion on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
56,534 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
86,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
58,094 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivative, net of tax |
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
6,898 |
|
|
|
(4,508 |
) |
|
|
5,129 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net
income, net of tax |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
4,842 |
|
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
65,211 |
|
|
$ |
65,312 |
|
|
$ |
90,822 |
|
|
$ |
99,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
349,051,983 |
|
|
|
296,670,880 |
|
|
|
348,608,037 |
|
|
|
227,238,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
356,177,866 |
|
|
|
306,484,317 |
|
|
|
355,440,059 |
|
|
|
235,898,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
118,188 |
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
12,967 |
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
59,794 |
|
|
|
62,158 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
65,993 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,757 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
Prepaid charges |
|
|
(17,920 |
) |
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
Deferred charges |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(9,332 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(46,872 |
) |
|
|
7,212 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
12,383 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
331,418 |
|
|
|
267,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(388,502 |
) |
|
|
(347,114 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
24,446 |
|
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,371,757 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1,226,823 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
Purchases of and deposits for FCC licenses |
|
|
(313,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
(25,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(703,165 |
) |
|
|
(1,495,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
29,479 |
|
|
|
59,076 |
|
Proceeds from 91/4% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
Proceeds from initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,266 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
8,997 |
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
30,476 |
|
|
|
1,294,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(341,271 |
) |
|
|
66,338 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
1,128,937 |
|
|
$ |
227,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
balances and results of operations of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (MetroPCS) and its
consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). MetroPCS indirectly owns, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, 85% of the limited liability company member interest in Royal Street
Communications, LLC (Royal Street Communications). The consolidated financial statements include
the balances and results of operations of MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the
balances and results of operations of Royal Street Communications and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively Royal Street). The Company consolidates its interest in Royal Street in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, because Royal Street is a variable interest entity and the Company
will absorb all of Royal Streets expected losses. All intercompany accounts and transactions
between MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and Royal Street have been eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements. The redeemable minority interest in Royal Street is included in
long-term liabilities. The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and cash flows
for the periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related footnotes are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Federal
Universal Service Fund (FUSF) and E-911 fees are assessed by various
governmental authorities in connection with the services that the Company provides to its
customers. The Company reports these fees on a gross basis in service revenues and cost of service
on the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. For the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded approximately $30.3 million and $25.3 million,
respectively, of FUSF and E-911 fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
the Company recorded approximately $56.6 million and $45.2 million, respectively, of FUSF and E-911
fees. Sales, use and excise taxes are reported on a net basis in selling, general and
administrative expenses on the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income.
On March 14, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a 3 for 1 stock split of the
Companys common stock effected by means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each
share of common stock issued and outstanding on that date. All share, per share and conversion
amounts relating to common stock and stock options included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS consummated its initial public offering (the Offering) of
57,500,000 shares of common stock priced at $23.00 per share (less underwriting discounts and
commissions). MetroPCS sold 37,500,000 shares of common stock and certain of MetroPCS existing
stockholders sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock in the Offering, which included 7,500,000
shares sold by MetroPCS existing stockholders pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option. Concurrent with the Offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including accrued but unpaid dividends, were converted into 150,962,644 shares of common stock.
The shares began trading on April 19, 2007 on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS.
2. Acquisitions:
On December 21, 2007, the Company executed an agreement with PTA Communications, Inc. (PTA)
to purchase 10 MHz of personal communications services (PCS) spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of
4
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Jacksonville, Florida. The Company also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc. (dba
Cleartalk PCS) and PTA-FLA, Inc. for the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing PCS
wireless telecommunications services in the Jacksonville market. On January 17, 2008, the Company
closed on the acquisition of certain assets used in providing PCS wireless services. The Company
paid a total of $18.6 million in cash for these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On May 13,
2008, the Company closed on the purchase of the 10 MHz of spectrum from PTA for the basic trading
area of Jacksonville, Florida for consideration of $6.5 million in cash.
3. Share-Based Payments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
"Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company has recognized stock-based compensation
expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, which includes stock options
granted to employees. The Company records stock-based compensation expense in cost of service and
selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under
SFAS No. 123(R) was $11.0 million and $7.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Cost of service for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes
$0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, selling, general and administrative expenses include $10.3 million
and $7.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense
recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) was $19.5 million and $11.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cost of service for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
includes $1.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, selling, general and administrative expenses include $18.3
million and $11.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation.
On March 7, 2008, the Company granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,393,065
shares of the Companys common stock to certain employees and non-employee directors. The exercise
price for the stock option grants is $16.20, which was equal to the Companys common stock closing
price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The stock options granted generally vest
on a four-year vesting schedule with 25% vesting on the first anniversary date of the award and the
remainder pro-rata on a monthly basis thereafter. The grant date fair value of these stock options
approximated $36.9 million.
4. Investments:
The Company has historically invested its substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. At
June 30, 2008, the Company had invested substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in money
market funds consisting of treasury securities.
The Company made an original investment of $133.9 million in principal in certain auction rate
securities, substantially all of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a
portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities.
Consistent with the Companys investment policy guidelines, the auction rate securities investments
held by the Company all had AAA/Aaa credit ratings at the time of purchase. With the liquidity
issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held by the
Company at June 30, 2008 have experienced continued failed auctions as the amount of securities
submitted for sale in the auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. In addition,
substantially all of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been downgraded or placed
on credit watch by at least one credit rating agency.
The estimated market value of the Companys auction rate security holdings at June 30, 2008
was approximately $19.7 million, which reflects a $114.2 million adjustment to the original
principal value of $133.9 million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was
approximately $36.1 million, which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the principal value at
that date. Although the auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated
terms, based on statements received from the Companys broker and an analysis of
other-than-temporary impairment factors, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million
and $17.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, reflecting an
additional portion of auction rate
5
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
security holdings that the Company has concluded have an other-than-temporary decline in
value. The offsetting increase in fair value of approximately $0.7 million is reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets, net of income taxes in the
amount of $0.2 million.
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, the Companys auction rate securities
were presented as current assets under short-term investments on the Companys balance sheet.
Given the failed auctions, the Companys auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a
successful auction for them. Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining auction rate
securities has been reclassified from current to non-current assets and is presented in long-term
investments on the accompanying balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. If
uncertainties in the credit and capital markets continue or these markets deteriorate further, the
Company may incur additional impairments to its auction rate securities.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
On November 21, 2006, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of MetroPCS
(Wireless), entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of Wireless secured credit facility,
pursuant to which Wireless may borrow up to $1.7 billion, as amended, (the Senior Secured Credit
Facility). The agreement covers a notional amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this
portion of Wireless variable rate debt to fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%.
On April 30, 2008, Wireless entered into an additional two-year interest rate protection
agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure. The agreement is effective on June
30, 2008, covers a notional amount of $500.0 million and effectively converts this portion of
Wireless variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of 5.46%. The monthly interest
settlement periods began on June 30, 2008. This agreement expires on June 30, 2010. This
financial instrument is reported in long-term investments at a fair market value of approximately
$1.6 million as of June 30, 2008. The change in fair value of $1.6 million is reported in
accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets, net of income taxes in the
amount of approximately $0.6 million.
The interest rate protection agreement has been designated as a cash flow hedge. If a
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge and the hedging relationship qualifies for hedge
accounting under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended (SFAS No. 133), the effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified to
interest expense in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of a derivative qualifying for hedge accounting is recognized
in earnings in the period of the change. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the change in
fair value did not result in ineffectiveness.
At the inception of the cash flow hedge and quarterly thereafter, the Company performs an
assessment to determine whether changes in the fair values or cash flows of the derivatives are
deemed highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged
transaction. If at any time subsequent to the inception of the cash flow hedge, the assessment
indicates that the derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the Company will
discontinue hedge accounting and recognize all subsequent derivative gains and losses in results of
operations.
6
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
$ |
538,878 |
|
|
$ |
393,282 |
|
Network infrastructure |
|
|
2,215,024 |
|
|
|
1,901,119 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
60,044 |
|
|
|
44,059 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
39,990 |
|
|
|
33,410 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
9,712 |
|
|
|
7,833 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,863,877 |
|
|
|
2,379,910 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(600,654 |
) |
|
|
(488,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
2,263,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. FCC Licenses and Microwave Relocation Costs:
The Company operates broadband PCS networks under licenses granted by the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) for a particular geographic area on spectrum allocated by the FCC
for broadband PCS services. In addition, in November 2006, the Company acquired a number of
advanced wireless services (AWS) licenses which can be used to provide services comparable to the
PCS services provided by the Company, and other advanced wireless services. In June 2008, the
Company acquired a 700 MHz license that also can be used to provide similar services. The PCS
licenses previously included and the AWS licenses currently include the obligation to relocate
existing fixed microwave users of the Companys licensed spectrum if the use of the Companys
spectrum would interfere with their systems and/or reimburse other carriers (according to FCC
rules) that relocated prior users if the relocation benefits the Companys system. Accordingly,
the Company incurred costs related to microwave relocation in constructing its PCS and AWS
networks. The PCS and AWS licenses and microwave relocation costs are recorded at cost. Although
PCS and AWS licenses are issued with a stated term, 10 years in the case of the PCS licenses,
15 years in the case of the AWS licenses, and approximately
10.5 for 700 MHz licenses,
the renewal of PCS and AWS licenses is generally a routine matter without substantial cost, and the
Company has determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other
factors currently exist that limit the useful life of its PCS, AWS and 700 MHz licenses. The
carrying value of FCC licenses and microwave relocation costs was approximately $2.4 billion as of
June 30, 2008.
Auction 73
The Company participated as a bidder in FCC Auction No. 73 and on June 26, 2008, the Company
was granted a 700 MHz license for a total aggregate purchase price of approximately $313.3 million.
This 700 MHz license supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless spectrum previously granted to the
Company in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area as
a result of FCC Auction No. 66.
8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
195,766 |
|
|
$ |
131,177 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
54,878 |
|
|
|
25,399 |
|
Accrued accounts payable |
|
|
105,924 |
|
|
|
155,733 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
16,285 |
|
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
21,467 |
|
|
|
29,380 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
33,822 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
Taxes, other than income |
|
|
49,479 |
|
|
|
41,044 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
479,025 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
9. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
91/4% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
1,572,000 |
|
|
|
1,580,000 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
26,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
2,998,986 |
|
|
|
2,980,000 |
|
Add: unamortized premium on debt |
|
|
20,946 |
|
|
|
22,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
3,019,932 |
|
|
|
3,002,177 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(16,411 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,003,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/4% Senior Notes
On November 3, 2006, Wireless completed the sale of $1.0 billion of principal amount of
91/4% Senior Notes due 2014, (the Initial Notes). On June 6, 2007, Wireless completed the sale of
an additional $400.0 million of 91/4% Senior Notes (the Additional Notes and together
with the Initial Notes, the 91/4% Senior Notes) under the existing indenture at a price equal to
105.875% of the principal amount of such Additional Notes.
The 91/4% Senior Notes are unsecured obligations and are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS, Inc.,
and all of Wireless direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, but are not guaranteed by Royal
Street. Interest is payable on the 91/4% Senior Notes on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
Wireless may, at its option, redeem some or all of the 91/4% Senior Notes at any time on or after
November 1, 2010 for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 91/4% Senior
Notes. In addition, Wireless may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
91/4% Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain sales of equity securities.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 3, 2006, Wireless entered into the Senior Secured Credit Facility, which consists
of a $1.6 billion term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. On November 3,
2006, Wireless borrowed $1.6 billion under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The term loan
facility is repayable in quarterly installments in annual aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the
initial aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion.
The facilities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS,
Inc. and each of Wireless direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The facilities are not guaranteed by Royal Street, but Wireless pledged the
promissory note that Royal Street has given it in connection with amounts borrowed by Royal Street
from Wireless and the limited liability company member interest held in Royal Street
Communications. The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
cross defaults. The obligations are also secured by the capital stock of Wireless as well as
substantially all of Wireless present and future assets and the capital stock and substantially
all of the assets of each of its direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned subsidiaries
(except as prohibited by law and certain permitted exceptions), but excludes Royal Street.
The interest rate on the outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is
variable. The rate as of June 30, 2008 was 6.516%. On November 21, 2006, Wireless entered into a
three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure
and fulfill a requirement of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate debt to
fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. On February 20, 2007, Wireless entered into an
amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the amendment, the margin on the base rate
used to determine the Senior Secured Credit Facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
On April 30, 2008, Wireless entered into an additional two-year interest rate protection agreement
to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure.
8
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
This agreement is effective on June 30, 2008, covers a notional amount of $500.0 million and
effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual
rate of 5.46%.
Capital Lease Obligations
During 2007, the Company entered into various non-cancelable distributed antenna systems
(DAS) capital lease agreements, with varying expiration terms through 2023, covering dedicated
optical fiber. Assets and future obligations related to capital leases are included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet in property and equipment and long-term debt,
respectively. Depreciation of assets held under capital leases is included in depreciation and
amortization expense.
A summary of future minimum lease obligations for all non-cancelable capital lease agreements
as of June 30, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,287 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2,677 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2,757 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,840 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,135 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
36,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future lease payments |
|
|
49,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount representing interest |
|
|
(22,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments |
|
|
26,986 |
|
Current portion |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
26,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Fair Value Measurements:
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (SFAS No. 157) for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 became effective
for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, thereby
eliminating inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements, and
increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to
valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive
markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable
(e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities,
etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not
observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use. |
SFAS No. 157 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of
the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value calculation. The Companys financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis include short-term investments securities and derivative
financial instruments.
9
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Included in the Companys long-term investments securities are certain auction rate securities
some of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Due to the lack of
availability of observable market quotes on the Companys investment portfolio of auction rate
securities, the fair value was estimated based on the Companys broker-dealer valuation models and
an internal analysis by management of other-than-temporary impairment factors. The broker-dealer
models considered credit default risks, the liquidity of the underlying security and overall
capital market liquidity. Management also looked to other marketplace transactions, and
information received from other third party brokers in order to assess whether the fair value based
on the broker-dealer valuation models was reasonable. The valuation of the Companys investment
portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact the
Companys valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as the underlying
assets supporting those securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying
collateral values, discount rates, counterparty risk and ongoing strength and quality of market
credit and liquidity. Significant inputs to the investments valuation are unobservable in the
active markets and are classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Included in the Companys derivative financial instruments are interest rate swaps.
Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques.
These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as interest rates. These market inputs
are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instruments term, notional
amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest
rate swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at June 30, 2008, as required by SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
|
$ |
21,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,054 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,054 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of our Level 3 assets, as required by
SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements of Assets Using Level 3 Inputs |
|
Long-Term Investments |
|
Beginning balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
36,050 |
|
Total losses (gains) (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
17,080 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(798 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
19,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
Losses included in earnings that
are attributable to the change in
unrealized losses relating to
those assets still held at the
reporting date as reported in
impairment loss on investment
securities in the condensed
consolidated statements of income
and comprehensive income |
|
$ |
9,079 |
|
|
$ |
17,080 |
|
10
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11. Income Taxes:
The Company records income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 uses an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes,
wherein deferred taxes are provided for book and tax basis differences for assets and liabilities.
As part of the Companys financial process, it must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax
assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by
recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are
estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are
evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred
tax assets, the taxable income in prior carryback years that can be used to absorb net operating
losses and credit carrybacks and taxable income in future years. The Companys judgment regarding
future taxable income may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. tax laws and
other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax
assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made.
FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48), clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance
with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues. Since
December 31, 2007, there have been no changes in the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits. The
Company did accrue interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 on the
unrecognized tax benefit. A state examination is currently ongoing and the Company believes it is
reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly decrease
within the next 12 month period. The Company does not anticipate that a proposed adjustment would
result in a material change to the Companys financial position. The gross unrecognized tax
benefits could change due to settlement with this state in an amount up to $2.7 million. There have
been no additional changes in the Companys determination of the amounts that could significantly
change within the next twelve months.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining the 2005 tax year of Royal Street
Communications. Management does not believe the examination will have a significant effect on the
Companys tax position.
In addition, there are several state income and franchise tax examinations that are currently
in progress for the Company and/or certain of its subsidiaries for various tax years. Management
does not believe these examinations will have a significant effect on the Companys tax position.
12. Stockholders Equity:
Common Stock Issued to Directors
Non-employee members of MetroPCS Board of Directors receive compensation for serving on the
Board of Directors, as provided in MetroPCS Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan (the
Remuneration Plan). In 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors amended and
restated the Remuneration Plan (the 2008 Remuneration Plan) to be more competitive with the
market and to be more reflective of the Companys status as a public company. The Remuneration
Plan provided that each non-employee directors annual retainer and meeting fees may be paid, at
the election of each non-employee director, in cash, common stock, or a combination of cash and
common stock. The 2008 Remuneration Plan provides that each non-employee directors annual
retainer and meeting fees will be paid in cash and each director will receive options to purchase
common stock. In accordance with the 2008 Remuneration Plan, no shares of common stock were issued
to non-employee members of the Board of Directors during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, non-employee members of the Board of Directors were
issued 31,230 shares of common stock as partial payment of their annual retainer.
11
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13. Net Income Per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic EPSTwo Class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
58,094 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
Accrued dividends and accretion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,647 |
) |
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
56,534 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
86,763 |
|
Amount allocable to common shareholders |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
90.9 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
51,398 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
65,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
349,051,983 |
|
|
|
296,670,880 |
|
|
|
348,608,037 |
|
|
|
227,238,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
51,398 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
65,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
349,051,983 |
|
|
|
296,670,880 |
|
|
|
348,608,037 |
|
|
|
227,238,734 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
7,125,883 |
|
|
|
9,813,437 |
|
|
|
6,832,022 |
|
|
|
8,659,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
356,177,866 |
|
|
|
306,484,317 |
|
|
|
355,440,059 |
|
|
|
235,898,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share during 2007 is computed in accordance with EITF 03-6
Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, (EITF 03-06).
Under EITF 03-6, the preferred stock is considered a participating security for purposes of
computing earnings or loss per common share and, therefore, the preferred stock is included in the
computation of basic and diluted net income per common share using the two-class method, except
during periods of net losses. Preferred stock was included in the computation of income per common
share through April 24, 2007, the date of conversion to common stock as a result of the Offering.
When determining basic earnings per common share under EITF 03-6, undistributed earnings for a
period are allocated to a participating security based on the contractual participation rights of
the security to share in those earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been
distributed.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, 12.8 million and 4.5 million, respectively,
of stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since
the effect was anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, 10.8 million and
2.3 million, respectively, of stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net
income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, 36.5 million of convertible shares of Series D
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, 89.1 million of convertible
shares of Series D Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per
common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, 1.5 million of convertible shares of Series E
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, 3.7 million of convertible
shares of Series E Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per
common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
14. Commitments and Contingencies:
AWS Licenses Acquired in Auction 66
Spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized by a variety of categories of commercial and
governmental users. To foster the orderly clearing of the spectrum, the FCC adopted a transition
and cost sharing plan pursuant to which incumbent non-governmental users could be reimbursed for
relocating out of the band, and the costs of relocation would be shared by AWS licensees benefiting
from the relocation. The FCC has established a plan where
12
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
the AWS licensee and the incumbent non-governmental user are to negotiate voluntarily for
three years and then, if no agreement has been reached, the incumbent licensee is subject to
mandatory relocation where the AWS licensee can force the incumbent non-governmental licensee to
relocate at the AWS licensees expense. The spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized also
by incumbent governmental users. The FCC rules provide that a portion of the money raised in
Auction 66 will be used to reimburse the relocation costs of incumbent governmental users from the
AWS band. However, not all incumbent governmental users are obligated to relocate and some such
users may delay relocation for some time. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company incurred approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in microwave relocation
costs relating to its AWS licenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company
incurred approximately $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in microwave relocation costs
relating to its AWS licenses.
FCC Katrina Order
In October 2007, the FCC released an Order on Reconsideration (Reconsideration Order) which
requires the Company to maintain emergency backup power for a minimum of twenty-four hours for
assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and located inside mobile switching
offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power at other
locations, including cell sites and DAS nodes. If and when the rules take effect, the Company will
not be required to comply immediately with these minimum backup power requirements where the
Company can demonstrate that such compliance is precluded by: (i) federal, state, tribal or local
law; (ii) risk to safety of life or health; or (iii) private legal obligation or agreement. In
addition, within six months of the effective date of the Reconsideration Order, which is the date
of the federal register publication announcing Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval of
the information collection requirements, the Company will be required to file a report with the FCC
providing certain information with respect to compliance with the backup power requirements. The
District of Columbia Court of Appeals has stayed the effective date of the Reconsideration Order
pending the appeal of the Reconsideration Order by multiple parties. In July 2008, the Court issued
a decision ruling that the appeal was not ripe for a decision because the information collection
requirements, which the Court found integral to the rules, had not yet been submitted to or
approved by OMB. The Court, however, retained the case but held the appeal in abeyance pending a
decision by the OMB approving or disapproving the information collection requirements associated
with the rules. In cases where the Company identifies assets that were designed with less than the
required emergency backup power capacity and that is not precluded from compliance, the Company
must comply with the backup power requirement or, within 12 months from the effective date of the
rule, file with the FCC a certified emergency backup power compliance plan. That plan must certify
that and describe how the Company will provide emergency backup power to 100 percent of the area
covered by any non-compliant asset in the event of a commercial power failure. If the Company is
required to comply with the Reconsideration Order, the Company may be required to purchase
additional equipment, spend additional capital, seek and receive additional state and local
permits, authorizations and approvals, and incur additional operating expenses to comply with the
Reconsideration Order and such costs could be material. The Company could be forced to also
discontinue service from some sites or in some areas due to the new rules.
Litigation
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June
16, 2006, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless
Communication Services and Network and System for Delivering of Same, (the 497 Patent), held by
Leap. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages
and attorneys fees, for the Companys alleged willful infringement by the Companys wireless
communication systems and associated services of the 497 patent. The Company answered the
complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses, and together with two related entities,
counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities and certain current and former employees
of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In its counterclaims, the Company claims that it does not infringe
any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent, and the
Company asserts claims for constructive trust, misappropriation,
conversion and disclosure of
trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, breach of a confidential
relationship, and fraud. The Companys counterclaims seek monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, have answered the Companys
counterclaims, denied the Companys allegations and asserted affirmative defenses to its
counterclaims. In connection with denying a motion to dismiss by certain
13
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
individual defendants, the Court concluded that the Companys claims against those defendants
were compulsory counterclaims.
On May 16, 2008, the Court entered an order consolidating this action with the action brought
by Royal Street Communications described below for the purposes of discovery. On May 23, 2008, the
Court scheduled the claim construction hearing for both this action and the Royal Street
Communications action for late October 2008 and trial setting for April 2009. On July 1, 2008, the
Court entered an order accepting for filing a second amended complaint which added the Companys
wholly owned subsidiaries as additional defendants and dropped Leap Wireless International, Inc. as
a plaintiff. The Company plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497
Patent and to vigorously prosecute the Companys counterclaim against Leap.
The Company has also tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of its network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent declined to indemnify and
defend the Company. The Company filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County,
Texas, Cause No. 07-0710, for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate,
indemnify, defend and hold the Company harmless from the Leap patent infringement action and for
specific performance, for injunctive relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel Lucent has
responded to the Companys petition and requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny
every claim in the Companys petition asserted against Alcatel Lucent and order the Company to
amend its petition. The Company has responded to Alcatel Lucents request. The parties have
agreed to postpone the hearing on Alcatel Lucents request. No hearing is currently scheduled for
Alcatel Lucents request. The Company intends to vigorously prosecute this action.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not
being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. Leap responded to Royal Street
Communications complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal Street Communications complaint for
lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action be transferred to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, where Leap has brought suit
against the Company under the same patent. Royal Street Communications responded to this motion,
but the Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW, where it remains
pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street
Communications, alleging that Royal Street Communications willfully infringes the 497 Patent and
seeking both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for Royal Street Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems
and associated services of the 497 Patent. Leap also filed a motion to consolidate this action
with the Leap action against the Company. On May 16, 2008, the Court entered an order
consolidating this action with the action brought by Leap against the Company solely for the
purposes of discovery. On May 23, 2008, the Court scheduled the claims construction hearing for
this action and the Leap action described above for late October 2008 and on June 20, 2008 the
parties filed a proposed docket control order which requests that the Court stay the trial setting
in this action pending entry of Final Judgment in the Leap action directly against the Company.
Royal Street Communications plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497
Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, the Company and
Royal Street Communications could each be enjoined from operating its businesses in the manner in
which it and Royal Street Communications currently operate, could require the Company and Royal
Street Communications to expend additional capital to change certain technologies and operating
practices, or could prevent both the Company and Royal Street Communications from offering some or
all of the services the Company and Royal Street Communications each provide using some or all of
the Companys or Royal Street Communications existing systems. In addition, if Leap were
successful in its claim for monetary damages, the Company and Royal Street Communications could be
forced to pay Leap substantial damages, including treble damages if found to have willfully
infringed the 497 Patent, for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of its
revenues, which could materially adversely impact the Company and Royal Street Communications
financial performance. Further, if Leap were successful, the Company and/or Royal Street
Communications could be required to pay Leaps attorneys fees.
14
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In addition, the Company is involved in other litigation from time to time, including
litigation regarding intellectual property claims, that the Company considers to be in the normal
course of business. The Company is not currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that
it believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations or liquidity.
15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
109,438 |
|
|
$ |
90,049 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
Non-cash investing activities:
Net changes in the Companys accrued purchases of property, plant and equipment were $57.4
million and $10.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations were $26.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Non-cash financing activities:
The Company accrued dividends of $6.5 million related to the Series D Preferred Stock for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
The Company accrued dividends of $0.9 million related to the Series E Preferred Stock for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
16. Related-Party Transactions:
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own in the
aggregate an approximate 17% interest in a company that provides services to the Companys
customers, including handset insurance programs and roadside assistance services. Pursuant to the
Companys agreement with this related party, the Company bills its customers directly for these
services and remits the fees collected from its customers for these services to the related party.
Accruals for the fees that the Company collected from its customers are included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company had the
following transactions with this related party (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Fees received by the Company as
compensation for providing
billing and collection services |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
Handsets sold to the related party |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Accruals for fees collected from customers |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
Receivables from the related party included in accounts receivable |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
One of the Companys former directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own an interest in
a company that provides cell site leases to the Company. During the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively, for cell site leases. During the six months ended June 30,
15
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2008 and 2007, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.2 million, and $0.1
million, respectively, for cell site leases. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
Company owed approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, to this related party for
deferred rent liability related to these cell site leases that is included in deferred rents on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
17. Segment Information:
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had thirteen operating segments based on geographic region
within the United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles,
Miami, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco and Tampa/Sarasota.
Each of these operating segments provides wireless voice and data services and products to
customers in its service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these
services. These services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID,
call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging,
domestic and international long distance, international text messaging, ringtones, games and
content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile
Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail, location services and other value-added
services.
The Company aggregates its operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and
Expansion Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia and Tampa/Sarasota, are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which the Company launches service in that
operating segment. Expenses associated with the Companys national data center and national
operations center are allocated based on the average number of customers in each operating segment.
There are no transactions between reportable segments.
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal evaluation purposes.
16
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
377,602 |
|
|
$ |
220,960 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
598,562 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
48,276 |
|
|
|
31,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,245 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
425,878 |
|
|
|
252,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678,807 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
110,624 |
|
|
|
95,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,140 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
87,456 |
|
|
|
72,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,088 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
44,258 |
|
|
|
69,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,419 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
187,335 |
|
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,709 |
|
|
|
24,148 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
60,888 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
7,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,007 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
148,390 |
|
|
|
(8,714 |
) |
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
|
|
135,644 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,664 |
|
|
|
45,664 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
148,390 |
|
|
|
(8,714 |
) |
|
|
(53,720 |
) |
|
|
85,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
356,547 |
|
|
$ |
122,794 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
479,341 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
52,102 |
|
|
|
19,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,835 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
408,649 |
|
|
|
142,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,176 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
110,606 |
|
|
|
51,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,227 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
89,689 |
|
|
|
43,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,439 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
44,388 |
|
|
|
38,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,717 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
167,869 |
|
|
|
12,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,212 |
|
|
|
11,533 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
41,124 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
136,401 |
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
132,062 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
136,401 |
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(36,360 |
) |
|
|
97,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
746,872 |
|
|
$ |
413,660 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,160,532 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
107,880 |
|
|
|
72,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,629 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
854,752 |
|
|
|
486,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,341,161 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
217,909 |
|
|
|
176,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,614 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
197,889 |
|
|
|
162,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,245 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
87,825 |
|
|
|
129,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,793 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
357,861 |
|
|
|
30,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
64,236 |
|
|
|
44,508 |
|
|
|
9,444 |
|
|
|
118,188 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,732 |
|
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
284,262 |
|
|
|
(27,142 |
) |
|
|
(9,448 |
) |
|
|
247,672 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,083 |
|
|
|
93,083 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
284,262 |
|
|
|
(27,142 |
) |
|
|
(104,977 |
) |
|
|
152,143 |
|
17
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
693,481 |
|
|
$ |
225,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
918,857 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
48,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,005 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
813,851 |
|
|
|
274,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,087,862 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
211,046 |
|
|
|
96,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,562 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
202,929 |
|
|
|
103,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,747 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
87,684 |
|
|
|
67,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,654 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
318,191 |
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
56,317 |
|
|
|
21,597 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
253,626 |
|
|
|
(16,084 |
) |
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
|
|
234,738 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
253,626 |
|
|
|
(16,084 |
) |
|
|
(79,789 |
) |
|
|
157,753 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $0.7 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. Cost of service
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $1.2 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $10.3
million and $7.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
includes $18.3 million and $11.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed
separately. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of the
Companys ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements and to fund future growth. |
The following table reconciles segment Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 to consolidated income before provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
187,335 |
|
|
$ |
167,869 |
|
|
$ |
357,861 |
|
|
$ |
318,191 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
12,577 |
|
|
|
30,120 |
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
210,167 |
|
|
|
180,446 |
|
|
|
387,981 |
|
|
|
329,763 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(60,888 |
) |
|
|
(41,124 |
) |
|
|
(118,188 |
) |
|
|
(80,504 |
) |
(Loss) gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(2,628 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(2,649 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(11,007 |
) |
|
|
(7,653 |
) |
|
|
(19,472 |
) |
|
|
(11,864 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(45,664 |
) |
|
|
(49,168 |
) |
|
|
(93,083 |
) |
|
|
(98,144 |
) |
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(492 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
14,494 |
|
|
|
15,254 |
|
|
|
21,651 |
|
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
(9,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
85,956 |
|
|
$ |
97,134 |
|
|
$ |
152,143 |
|
|
$ |
157,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Guarantor Subsidiaries:
In connection with Wireless sale of the 91/4% Senior Notes and the entry into the Senior
Secured Credit Facility, MetroPCS and all of MetroPCS subsidiaries, other than Wireless and Royal
Street (the guarantor subsidiaries), provided guarantees on the 91/4% Senior Notes and Senior
Secured Credit Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several.
Certain provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4%
Senior Notes restrict the ability of Wireless to loan funds to MetroPCS. However, Wireless is
allowed to make certain permitted payments to MetroPCS under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit
Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4% Senior Notes. Royal Street (the non-guarantor
subsidiaries) is not a guarantor of the 91/4% Senior Notes or the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
The following information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 of the parent company (MetroPCS), the issuer (Wireless), the
guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries
18
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Royal Street). Investments in subsidiaries held by the parent company and the issuer have
been presented using the equity method of accounting.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
831,515 |
|
|
$ |
282,196 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
14,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,128,937 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,212 |
|
|
|
7,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,146 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,445 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
14,485 |
|
|
|
33,656 |
|
|
|
5,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,944 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,334 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
(188,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
832,644 |
|
|
|
588,979 |
|
|
|
59,248 |
|
|
|
29,022 |
|
|
|
(188,388 |
) |
|
|
1,321,505 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,348 |
|
|
|
1,875,413 |
|
|
|
357,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,263,223 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,348 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
567,579 |
|
|
|
1,582,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,149,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,097,360 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390,959 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,969 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
719,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(719,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,035 |
|
|
|
15,536 |
|
|
|
15,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,419,953 |
|
|
$ |
2,963,127 |
|
|
$ |
4,058,526 |
|
|
$ |
695,287 |
|
|
$ |
(3,058,114 |
) |
|
$ |
6,078,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
142,694 |
|
|
$ |
303,383 |
|
|
$ |
32,948 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
479,025 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,411 |
|
Current payable to subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
180,260 |
|
|
|
(188,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,004 |
|
|
|
106,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,286 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(548,080 |
) |
|
|
(1,163,752 |
) |
|
|
1,711,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(548,080 |
) |
|
|
(983,962 |
) |
|
|
2,134,731 |
|
|
|
213,579 |
|
|
|
(188,388 |
) |
|
|
627,880 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,976,946 |
|
|
|
26,458 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,003,521 |
|
Long-term payable to
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
719,886 |
|
|
|
(719,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,952 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,074 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,746 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,652 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,960 |
|
|
|
22,915 |
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(548,080 |
) |
|
|
2,395,548 |
|
|
|
2,228,178 |
|
|
|
943,374 |
|
|
|
(908,274 |
) |
|
|
4,110,746 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,553,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,553,234 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
428,395 |
|
|
|
582,018 |
|
|
|
1,830,348 |
|
|
|
(268,087 |
) |
|
|
(2,144,279 |
) |
|
|
428,395 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(13,631 |
) |
|
|
(14,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,439 |
|
|
|
(13,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,968,033 |
|
|
|
567,579 |
|
|
|
1,830,348 |
|
|
|
(248,087 |
) |
|
|
(2,149,840 |
) |
|
|
1,968,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,419,953 |
|
|
$ |
2,963,127 |
|
|
$ |
4,058,526 |
|
|
$ |
695,287 |
|
|
$ |
(3,058,114 |
) |
|
$ |
6,078,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
801,472 |
|
|
$ |
633,277 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
35,015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,904 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,485 |
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
803,841 |
|
|
|
974,793 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
39,095 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
1,546,647 |
|
|
|
300,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
36,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,362,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,296 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,524 |
|
|
|
6,442 |
|
|
|
13,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
(2,607,051 |
) |
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
154,205 |
|
|
$ |
244,913 |
|
|
$ |
40,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,369 |
|
|
|
96,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(537,540 |
) |
|
|
(949,296 |
) |
|
|
1,486,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
(754,598 |
) |
|
|
1,832,072 |
|
|
|
195,237 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
580,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,939 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,723 |
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
2,571,462 |
|
|
|
1,876,648 |
|
|
|
819,686 |
|
|
|
(772,949 |
) |
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
|
|
485,871 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(193,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,828,581 |
) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
(14,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(173,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
(2,607,051 |
) |
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
599,556 |
|
|
$ |
26,887 |
|
|
$ |
(27,881 |
) |
|
$ |
598,562 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
75,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
675,405 |
|
|
|
26,887 |
|
|
|
(27,881 |
) |
|
|
678,807 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,129 |
|
|
|
21,892 |
|
|
|
(27,881 |
) |
|
|
206,140 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
155,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,088 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
107,978 |
|
|
|
5,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,419 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
51,340 |
|
|
|
9,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,888 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
|
529,979 |
|
|
|
36,616 |
|
|
|
(27,881 |
) |
|
|
543,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
145,426 |
|
|
|
(9,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,644 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,630 |
|
|
|
(6,126 |
) |
|
|
25,724 |
|
|
|
(26,564 |
) |
|
|
45,664 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(55,401 |
) |
|
|
(116,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(4,143 |
) |
|
|
(27,525 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
26,564 |
|
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment
securities |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(50,465 |
) |
|
|
(90,945 |
) |
|
|
(6,163 |
) |
|
|
25,493 |
|
|
|
171,768 |
|
|
|
49,688 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
50,465 |
|
|
|
90,892 |
|
|
|
151,589 |
|
|
|
(35,222 |
) |
|
|
(171,768 |
) |
|
|
85,956 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
55,401 |
|
|
$ |
151,589 |
|
|
$ |
(35,222 |
) |
|
$ |
(171,768 |
) |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
479,311 |
|
|
$ |
5,541 |
|
|
$ |
(6,088 |
) |
|
$ |
479,341 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
68,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
547,580 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
(6,088 |
) |
|
|
551,176 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,538 |
|
|
|
12,777 |
|
|
|
(6,088 |
) |
|
|
162,227 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
130,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,439 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
77,733 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,717 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
40,198 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,124 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
403,114 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
(6,088 |
) |
|
|
419,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
144,466 |
|
|
|
(12,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,062 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,824 |
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
(15,436 |
) |
|
|
49,168 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(50,221 |
) |
|
|
(123,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(7,873 |
) |
|
|
(21,393 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(658 |
) |
|
|
15,435 |
|
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(58,094 |
) |
|
|
(88,684 |
) |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
9,967 |
|
|
|
173,589 |
|
|
|
34,928 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
58,094 |
|
|
|
89,261 |
|
|
|
146,316 |
|
|
|
(22,948 |
) |
|
|
(173,589 |
) |
|
|
97,134 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
58,094 |
|
|
$ |
50,221 |
|
|
$ |
146,316 |
|
|
$ |
(22,948 |
) |
|
$ |
(173,589 |
) |
|
$ |
58,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,162,751 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
$ |
(41,956 |
) |
|
$ |
1,160,532 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,403 |
|
|
|
173,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,403 |
|
|
|
1,335,977 |
|
|
|
39,737 |
|
|
|
(41,956 |
) |
|
|
1,341,161 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,984 |
|
|
|
41,586 |
|
|
|
(41,956 |
) |
|
|
394,614 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
|
353,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,245 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
207,245 |
|
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,793 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
100,915 |
|
|
|
17,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,188 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
1,058,990 |
|
|
|
68,946 |
|
|
|
(41,956 |
) |
|
|
1,093,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
276,987 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,672 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,642 |
|
|
|
(17,541 |
) |
|
|
46,366 |
|
|
|
(49,384 |
) |
|
|
93,083 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(96,146 |
) |
|
|
(219,551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(10,918 |
) |
|
|
(53,122 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
49,384 |
|
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment
securities |
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(89,984 |
) |
|
|
(158,411 |
) |
|
|
(17,605 |
) |
|
|
45,832 |
|
|
|
315,697 |
|
|
|
95,529 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
89,984 |
|
|
|
158,305 |
|
|
|
294,592 |
|
|
|
(75,041 |
) |
|
|
(315,697 |
) |
|
|
152,143 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
96,146 |
|
|
$ |
294,592 |
|
|
$ |
(75,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(315,697 |
) |
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
918,798 |
|
|
$ |
9,766 |
|
|
$ |
(10,862 |
) |
|
$ |
918,857 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,646 |
|
|
|
162,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,801 |
|
|
|
1,081,157 |
|
|
|
9,766 |
|
|
|
(10,862 |
) |
|
|
1,087,862 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,948 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
(10,862 |
) |
|
|
307,562 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
300,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,747 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown
separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
146,064 |
|
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,654 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,907 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,646 |
|
|
|
823,937 |
|
|
|
33,403 |
|
|
|
(10,862 |
) |
|
|
853,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
257,220 |
|
|
|
(23,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,738 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,137 |
|
|
|
(3,368 |
) |
|
|
20,354 |
|
|
|
(28,979 |
) |
|
|
98,144 |
|
Earnings from consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(85,702 |
) |
|
|
(217,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(8,744 |
) |
|
|
(40,609 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
28,979 |
|
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(94,446 |
) |
|
|
(147,854 |
) |
|
|
(3,383 |
) |
|
|
19,092 |
|
|
|
303,576 |
|
|
|
76,985 |
|
Income (loss) before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
94,446 |
|
|
|
149,009 |
|
|
|
260,603 |
|
|
|
(42,729 |
) |
|
|
(303,576 |
) |
|
|
157,753 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
|
$ |
85,702 |
|
|
$ |
260,603 |
|
|
$ |
(42,729 |
) |
|
$ |
(303,576 |
) |
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
96,146 |
|
|
$ |
294,592 |
|
|
$ |
(75,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(315,697 |
) |
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
100,915 |
|
|
|
17,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,188 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,134 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,322 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
24,880 |
|
|
|
(24,883 |
) |
|
|
1,205 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
Impairment loss in investment securities |
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,794 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(86,055 |
) |
|
|
(189,370 |
) |
|
|
(117,935 |
) |
|
|
(16,102 |
) |
|
|
415,230 |
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
21,009 |
|
|
|
(31,324 |
) |
|
|
312,785 |
|
|
|
(45,702 |
) |
|
|
74,650 |
|
|
|
331,418 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,947 |
|
|
|
(338,720 |
) |
|
|
(53,048 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(388,502 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
27,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,446 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Purchases of and deposits for FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(313,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(313,267 |
) |
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,162 |
) |
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(335,037 |
) |
|
|
(312,650 |
) |
|
|
(52,834 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(703,165 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,479 |
|
Proceeds from long-term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
(170,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,632 |
) |
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,399 |
) |
|
|
92,399 |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
8,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
8,997 |
|
|
|
15,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,168 |
|
|
|
(71,969 |
) |
|
|
30,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
|
(351,081 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(20,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341,271 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
801,472 |
|
|
|
633,277 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
35,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
831,515 |
|
|
$ |
282,196 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
14,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,128,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(in thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
|
$ |
85,702 |
|
|
$ |
260,603 |
|
|
$ |
(42,729 |
) |
|
$ |
(303,576 |
) |
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,907 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,573 |
|
|
|
(19,573 |
) |
|
|
2,048 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(1,473 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement
obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
572 |
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,158 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(101,512 |
) |
|
|
(161,976 |
) |
|
|
(118,748 |
) |
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
397,207 |
|
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities |
|
|
(8,539 |
) |
|
|
(12,321 |
) |
|
|
240,417 |
|
|
|
(26,306 |
) |
|
|
74,058 |
|
|
|
267,309 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,247 |
) |
|
|
(241,518 |
) |
|
|
(59,724 |
) |
|
|
(8,625 |
) |
|
|
(347,114 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of
property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,780 |
) |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(1,403,253 |
) |
|
|
(968,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,371,757 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
630,856 |
|
|
|
595,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226,823 |
|
Change in restricted cash and
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(772,397 |
) |
|
|
(414,008 |
) |
|
|
(240,339 |
) |
|
|
(59,724 |
) |
|
|
(8,625 |
) |
|
|
(1,495,093 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,076 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to
parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from 91/4% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
Proceeds initial public offering |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(44,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,266 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,135 |
) |
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options |
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
822,554 |
|
|
|
470,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,941 |
|
|
|
(65,433 |
) |
|
|
1,294,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
41,618 |
|
|
|
43,731 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(19,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,338 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning
of period |
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
99,301 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
46,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of
period |
|
$ |
57,332 |
|
|
$ |
143,032 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
27,137 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
227,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
19. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, (SFAS No.
141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R).
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, (SFAS No. 160), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a
parents ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
requires enhanced disclosures about a companys derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced
disclosures will discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related
interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. The Company has not
yet determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon
adoption of SFAS No. 161.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets, (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet determined the effect on its
financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of FSP 142-3.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements. SFAS No.
162 is effective 60 days following the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions, approval
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The implementation of
this standard will not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of
operations.
20. Subsequent Events:
The Company has entered into various agreements for the acquisition of spectrum in the
aggregate amount of approximately $15.0 million. Consummation of
these acquisitions is
conditioned upon customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
27
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and should be evaluated as
such. Forward-looking statements include information concerning any possible or assumed future
results of operations, including statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies,
goals, future events, future revenues or performance, future penetration rates, planned market
launches, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical
information. Forward-looking statements often include words such as anticipate, expect,
suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates, targets, projects, would, should,
could, may, will, continue, forecast, and other similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are contained throughout this report, including Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Legal Proceedings, and Risk
Factors.
We base the forward-looking statements or projections made in this report on our current
expectations, plans and assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry,
as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments
and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances and at such times. As you
read and consider this report, you should understand that these forward-looking statements or
projections are not guarantees of future performance or results. Although we believe that these
forward-looking statements and projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are
made, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance
or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in the forward-looking statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such
forward-looking statements and projections include:
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of our industry; |
|
|
|
|
the rapid technological changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
an economic slowdown or recession in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain the growth rates we have experienced to date; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to construct and launch future markets within projected time frames; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve our
financial and disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to clear the Auction 66 spectrum of incumbent licensees; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately enforce or protect our intellectual property rights or defend
against suits filed by others; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of our services and the costs of compliance and our failure to
comply with such regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our capital structure, including our indebtedness amounts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors described under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended
December 31, 2007 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, as updated or supplemented in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
28
These forward-looking statements and projections speak only as to the date made and are
subject to and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, many of which are beyond our control
or ability to predict and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements
and projections. All future written and oral forward-looking statements and projections
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our
cautionary statements. We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any
forward-looking statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or
circumstances, except as required by law.
Company Overview
Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are those of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including MetroPCS
Wireless, Inc. and Royal Street Communications, LLC. References to MetroPCS, MetroPCS
Communications, our Company, the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to MetroPCS
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unless otherwise
indicated, all share numbers and per share prices give effect to a 3 for 1 stock split effected by
means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. On April 18, 2007, the registration
statement for our initial public offering became effective and our common stock began trading on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS on April 19, 2007. We consummated our initial
public offering of our common stock on April 24, 2007.
We are a wireless telecommunications carrier that currently offers wireless services primarily
in the greater Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami,
Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Sacramento and Tampa/Sarasota metropolitan
areas. We launched service in the greater Atlanta, Miami and Sacramento metropolitan areas in the
first quarter of 2002; in San Francisco in September 2002; in Tampa/Sarasota in October 2005; in
Dallas/Ft. Worth in March 2006; in Detroit in April 2006; in Orlando in November 2006; in Los
Angeles in September 2007; in Las Vegas in March 2008; in Jacksonville in May 2008; and in
Philadelphia in July 2008. In 2005, Royal Street Communications, LLC, or Royal Street
Communications, and with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, or collectively, Royal Street, was granted
licenses by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, in Los Angeles and various metropolitan
areas throughout northern Florida. We own 85% of the limited liability company member interests in
Royal Street, but may only elect two of the five members of Royal Street Communications management
committee. We have a wholesale arrangement with Royal Street under which we purchase up to 85% of
the engineered capacity of Royal Streets systems allowing us to sell our standard products and
services under the MetroPCS brand to the public. Royal Street has constructed, or is in the
process of constructing, its network infrastructure in its licensed metropolitan areas. We
commenced commercial services in Orlando and certain portions of northern Florida in November 2006
and in Los Angeles in September 2007 through our arrangements with Royal Street. Additionally,
upon Royal Streets request, we have provided and will provide financing to Royal Street under a
loan agreement. On April 2, 2008, we executed an amendment to the loan agreement which increased
the amount available to Royal Street under the loan agreement by an additional $255.0 million. On
June 12, we executed an additional amendment to the loan agreement which increased the amount
available to Royal Street under the loan agreement by an additional $75.0 million. As of June 30,
2008, the maximum amount that Royal Street could borrow from us under the loan agreement was
approximately $1.0 billion of which Royal Street had borrowed $760.0 million through June 30, 2008.
As a result of the significant growth we have experienced since we launched operations, our
results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected in
future periods. Moreover, we expect that our number of customers will continue to increase, which
will continue to contribute to increases in our revenues and operating expenses. In November 2006,
we were granted advanced wireless services, or AWS, licenses in Auction 66, currently covering a
total population of approximately 125 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$1.4 billion. Approximately 82 million of the total licensed population associated with our
Auction 66 licenses represent expansion opportunities in geographic areas outside of our then
current operating markets, which we refer to as our Auction 66 Markets. These new expansion
opportunities in our Auction 66 Markets cover six of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the
United States. The balance of our Auction 66 Markets, which currently cover a population of
approximately 43 million, supplements or expands the geographic boundaries
29
of our and Royal Streets then existing operations in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles,
San Francisco and Sacramento. We currently plan to focus on building out approximately 40 million
of the total population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on the New York,
Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. Of the approximate 40 million total
population, we are targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of
approximately 30 to 32 million by late 2008 through the first half of 2009. Our initial launch
dates will vary in our Auction 66 Markets and our launch dates in the larger metropolitan areas
will be accomplished in phases. We launched service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March
2008 and in the Philadelphia metropolitan area in July 2008.
We participated as a bidder in FCC Auction No. 73 and on June 26, 2008, we were granted a 12
MHz Lower Band Block A license for the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode
Island/Vermont Economic Area, or the 700 MHz License, for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $313.3 million. The 700 MHz License supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless
spectrum previously granted to us in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode
Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result of FCC Auction No. 66.
We sell products and services to customers through our Company-owned retail stores as well as
indirectly through relationships with independent retailers. We offer service which allows our
customers to place unlimited local calls from within our local service area and to receive
unlimited calls from any area while in our local service area, under simple and affordable flat
monthly rate service plans starting at $30 per month. For an additional $5 to $20 per month, our
customers may select a service plan that offers additional services, such as unlimited voicemail,
caller ID, call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, unlimited text messaging, mobile Internet
browsing, push e-mail, mobile instant messaging, picture and multimedia messaging and the ability
to place unlimited long distance calls from within our local service calling area to any number in
the continental United States. We offer flat-rate monthly plans at $30, $35, $40, $45 and $50, as
well as Family plans which offer discounts off our monthly plans for multiple lines. All of these
plans require payment in advance for one month of service. If no payment is made in advance for the
following month of service, service is discontinued at the end of the month that was paid for by
the customer. For additional fees, we also provide international long distance and international
text messaging, ringtones, ring back tones, downloads, games and content applications, unlimited
directory assistance, location services and other value-added services. As of June 30, 2008, over
85% of our customers have selected a $40 or higher rate plan. Our flat-rate plans differentiate
our service from the more complex plans and long-term contract requirements of traditional wireless
carriers. In addition, the above products and services are offered by us in the Royal Street
markets under the MetroPCS brand.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We have
discussed those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in
their application in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on
February 29, 2008.
Other than the adoption of SFAS No. 157, our critical accounting policies and the
methodologies and assumptions we apply under them have not materially changed from our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Revenues
We derive our revenues from the following sources:
Service. We sell wireless broadband PCS services. The various types of service revenues
associated with wireless broadband PCS for our customers include monthly recurring charges for
airtime, monthly recurring charges for optional features (including nationwide long distance,
unlimited text messaging, international text messaging, voicemail, downloads, ringtones, games and
content applications, unlimited directory assistance, enhanced directory assistance, ring back
tones, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail, location services and
30
nationwide roaming) and charges for domestic and international long distance service. Service
revenues also include intercarrier compensation and nonrecurring activation service charges to
customers.
Equipment. We sell wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories that are used by our
customers in connection with our wireless services. This equipment is also sold to our independent
retailers to facilitate distribution to our customers.
Costs and Expenses
Our costs and expenses include:
Cost of Service. The major components of our cost of service are:
|
|
|
Cell Site Costs. We incur expenses for the rent of cell sites, network
facilities, engineering operations, field technicians and related utility and
maintenance charges. |
|
|
|
|
Intercarrier Compensation. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies
for their transport and termination of calls originated by our customers and destined
for customers of other networks. These variable charges are based on our customers
usage and generally applied at pre-negotiated rates with other carriers, although some
carriers have sought to impose such charges unilaterally. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Long Distance. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies for
long distance service provided to our customers. These variable charges are based on
our customers usage, applied at pre-negotiated rates with the long distance carriers. |
Cost of Equipment. We purchase wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories from
third-party vendors to resell to our customers and independent retailers in connection with our
services. We subsidize the sale of handsets to encourage the sale and use of our services. We do
not manufacture any of this equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling expense includes advertising and
promotional costs associated with marketing and selling to new customers and fixed charges such as
retail store rent and retail associates salaries. General and administrative expense includes
support functions including, technical operations, finance, accounting, human resources,
information technology and legal services. We record stock-based compensation expense in cost of
service and in selling, general and administrative expenses for expense associated with employee
stock options, which is measured at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the
award.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service, which are seven to ten
years for network infrastructure assets and capitalized interest, three to seven years for office
equipment, which includes computer equipment, three to seven years for furniture and fixtures and
five years for vehicles. Leasehold improvements and capital lease assets are amortized over the
term of the respective leases, which includes renewal periods that are reasonably assured, or the
estimated useful life of the asset or improvement, whichever is shorter.
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Interest expense includes interest incurred on our
borrowings, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of discounts and premiums on
long-term debt. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash and cash equivalents.
Income Taxes. As a result of our operating losses and accelerated depreciation available under
federal tax laws, we paid no federal income taxes during the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we paid approximately $1.7
million and $2.1 million, respectively, in state income taxes. We paid no significant state income
taxes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
31
Seasonality
Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling
periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical results,
we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth quarters.
Softening of sales and increased customer turnover, or churn, in the second and third quarters of
the year usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions. However, sales activity and
churn can be strongly affected by the launch of new markets and promotional activity, which have
the ability to reduce or outweigh certain seasonal effects.
Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131 Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of June 30, 2008, we had thirteen operating segments based on geographic region within the
United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York,
Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Tampa/Sarasota. Each of these
operating segments provide wireless voice and data services and products to customers in its
service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these services. These
services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting,
enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging, domestic and
international long distance, international text messaging, ringtones, games and content
applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet
browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail, location services and other value-added services.
We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and Expansion
Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, and Tampa/Sarasota are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which we launch service in that operating
segment. Expenses associated with our national data center are allocated based on the average
number of customers in each operating segment. All intercompany transactions between reportable
segments have been eliminated in the presentation of operating segment data.
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating profit for internal evaluation purposes.
32
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
377,602 |
|
|
$ |
356,547 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
220,960 |
|
|
|
122,794 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
598,562 |
|
|
$ |
479,341 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
48,276 |
|
|
$ |
52,102 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
31,969 |
|
|
|
19,733 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
80,245 |
|
|
$ |
71,835 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
110,624 |
|
|
$ |
110,606 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
95,516 |
|
|
|
51,621 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
206,140 |
|
|
$ |
162,227 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
87,456 |
|
|
$ |
89,689 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
72,632 |
|
|
|
43,750 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160,088 |
|
|
$ |
133,439 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization disclosed separately
below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
44,258 |
|
|
$ |
44,388 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
69,161 |
|
|
|
38,329 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
113,419 |
|
|
$ |
82,717 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
187,335 |
|
|
$ |
167,869 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
22,832 |
|
|
|
12,577 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
32,709 |
|
|
$ |
28,212 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
24,148 |
|
|
|
11,533 |
|
|
|
109 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
192 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
60,888 |
|
|
$ |
41,124 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
3,796 |
|
|
$ |
3,904 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
7,211 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,007 |
|
|
$ |
7,653 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
148,390 |
|
|
$ |
136,401 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(8,714 |
) |
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(4,032 |
) |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
135,644 |
|
|
$ |
132,062 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, cost of service includes $0.7
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $10.3 million of stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, cost of service includes $0.5
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $7.2 million of stock-based
compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our
ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and
to fund future growth. |
33
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $119.3 million, or 25%, to $598.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $479.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $21.1 million, or 6%, to $377.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $356.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to net
customer additions of approximately 273,000 customers for the twelve months ended June 30,
2008, which accounted for $37.1 million of the Core Markets increase, partially offset by
the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from certain features now
included in our service plans that were previously provided a la carte, accounting for a
$9.9 million decrease. In addition, consolidated E-911, Federal Universal Service Fund, or
FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased $6.1 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase is primarily
attributable to a 30% increase in our consolidated customer base since June 30, 2007 and
higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1, 2008, a portion of these revenues were
allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of $12.2 million resulting in a net
decrease of $6.1 million in the Core Markets for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $98.2 million, or 80%,
to $221.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $122.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net customer additions of approximately 775,000 customers for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2008, which accounted for $94.0 million of the Expansion Markets
increase, partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced
revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were previously
provided a la carte, accounting for an $8.0 million decrease. In addition, E-911, FUSF,
vendors compensation and activation revenues increased approximately $12.2 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to
the allocation of a portion of these revenues to the Expansion Markets beginning on January
1, 2008. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $8.4 million, or 12%, to $80.2 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $71.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues, partially
offset by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $3.8 million, or 7%, to $48.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $52.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily attributable to the
sale of lower priced handset models accounting for $3.7 million of the decrease coupled
with a decrease in gross customer additions accounting for $0.9 million. These decreases
in equipment revenues were partially offset by an increase in upgrade handset sales to
existing customers which accounted for a $0.4 million increase in equipment revenues as
well as an increase in accessory sales which accounted for a $0.4 million increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $12.2 million, or
62%, to $31.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $19.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 157,000 customers
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, which
accounted for $8.4 million of the Expansion Markets increase, an increase in upgrade
handset sales to existing customers which accounted for $6.5 million of the increase and an
increase of approximately $0.8 million in additional accessory sales. These increases in
equipment revenues were partially offset by the sale of lower priced handset models which
accounted for a $3.5 million decrease from the same period in 2007. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $43.9 million, or 27%, to $206.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $162.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of service as follows:
34
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was
$110.6 million and remained relatively flat when compared to the same period in 2007. Core
Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses) increased $5.2
million, or 6%, to $89.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $84.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable
to the 11% growth in our Core Markets customer base and the deployment of additional
network infrastructure during the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. In addition,
consolidated E-911, FUSF, and NECA/TRS expenses increased $6.1 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase is primarily
attributable to a 30% increase in our consolidated customer base since June 30, 2007 and
higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1, 2008, a portion of these expenses were
allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of $11.3 million resulting in a net
decrease of $5.2 million in the Core Markets for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $43.9 million, or 85%,
to $95.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $51.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. Expansion Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and
NECA/TRS expenses) increased $32.6 million, or 64%, to $83.6 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from $51.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily attributable to the 77% growth in our Expansion Markets customer
base, coupled with expenses as a result of the launch of service in the Las Vegas and
Jacksonville metropolitan areas as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York,
Philadelphia and Boston metropolitan areas. In addition, E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses
increased approximately $11.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the allocation of a portion of these expenses
to the Expansion Markets beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $26.7 million, or 20%, to $160.1 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $133.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment, partially
offset by a decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $2.2 million, or 2%, to $87.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $89.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment is primarily
attributable to a decrease in gross customer additions which accounted for $3.2 million
when compared to the same period in 2007, partially offset by an increase in upgrade
handset sales to existing customers which accounted for a $0.5 million increase in cost of
equipment as well as an increase in cost of accessories from an increase in accessory sales
accounting for a $0.2 million increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $28.9 million, or 66%,
to $72.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $43.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment is
primarily attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 157,000
customers for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007,
which accounted for $20.9 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with an
increase in the sale of handsets to existing customers accounting for $9.2 million of the
increase as well as an increase of $0.8 million in handset refurbishment cost and an
increase in cost of accessories accounting for $0.3 million. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease in Expansion Markets cost of equipment as a result of the
sale of lower priced handsets accounting for $2.3 million. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $30.7 million, or 37%, to $113.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
$82.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an
increase in Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.1
million to $44.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $44.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by $2.1 million, or
approximately 11% for the three months ended June 30, |
35
|
|
|
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in selling expenses is
primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to
support the growth in the Core Markets and a $0.3 million increase related to FUSF billings
that were allocated to selling expenses beginning January 1, 2008. General and
administrative expenses decreased $2.2 million, or approximately 9% for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to a decrease in
various administrative expenses incurred as a result of cost benefits achieved due to the
increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $30.8 million, or 80%, to $69.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
from $38.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by
$17.9 million, or approximately 129% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily due to a $10.7 million
increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth in the
Expansion Markets as well as higher employee related costs of $4.5 million to support the
growth and buildout of the Expansion Markets. General and administrative expenses
increased by $12.9 million, or approximately 53% for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to the 77% growth in our Expansion
Markets customer base, including the launch of service on the Las Vegas and Jacksonville
metropolitan areas, as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia
and Boston metropolitan areas. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $19.8 million,
or 48%, to $60.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $41.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.5
million, or 16%, to $32.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $28.2
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase related primarily to
additional network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months ended
June 30, 2008 to support our continued growth. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$12.6 million, or 109%, to $24.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
$11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase related primarily to
an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended June 30, 2008 driven primarily by the launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas
and Jacksonville metropolitan areas. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $3.3 million, or
44%, to $11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $7.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets
stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets stock-based
compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Stock-based compensation expense in the Core Markets remained relatively
flat during the three months ended June 30, 2008, decreasing $0.1 million, or 3%, to $3.8
million from $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $3.4
million, or 92%, to $7.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $3.8 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase
in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended
June 30, 2008 as a result of an increase in employees to support the growth and build-out
of the Expansion Markets. |
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
$ |
2,628 |
|
|
$ |
(393 |
) |
|
|
769 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
45,664 |
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
)% |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
35,491 |
|
|
|
39,040 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Net income |
|
|
50,465 |
|
|
|
58,094 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets. Loss on disposal of assets increased $3.0 million to $2.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from a gain of $0.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded a loss on disposal
of assets related to certain network technology that was retired and replaced with new technology.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $3.5 million, or 7%, to $45.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $49.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the capitalization of $13.6 million of interest
during the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $7.2 million of interest capitalized
during the same period in 2007. We capitalize interest costs associated with our FCC licenses and
property and equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of such capitalized
interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in progress involved
in those markets and the duration of the construction process. We expect capitalized interest to
be significant during the construction of the Auction 66 Markets. In addition, our weighted
average interest rate decreased to 7.63% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 8.11%
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of the borrowing rates under the senior
secured credit facility. Average debt outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was
$3.0 billion compared to the average debt outstanding for the three months ending June 30, 2007 of
$2.7 billion. The increase in average debt outstanding was due to the issuance of an additional
$400.0 million principal amount of our 91/4% senior notes in June 2007.
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased $9.1 million, or 63%, to $5.4
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $14.5 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007. The decrease in interest and other income was primarily due to the Company investing
substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in money market funds consisting of U.S.
treasury securities rather than in short-term investments as the Company has done historically.
For further discussion see Note 4 to the financial statements included in this report.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our
substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the
United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money
market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. We made an original investment of $133.9 million
in principal in certain auction rate securities that were rated AAA/Aaa at the time of purchase,
substantially all of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the
underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. With the
liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held
by us at June 30, 2008 have experienced continued failed auctions as the amount of securities
submitted for sale in the auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. We recognized an
additional other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities in the amount of $9.1
million during the three months ended June 30, 2008. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $35.5 million and $39.0 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate was 41.3% and
40.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our effective rates differ
from the statutory federal rate of 35% for state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses and an
increase in the valuation allowance which was related to the impairment loss recognized on
investment securities during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Net Income. Net income decreased $7.6 million, or 13%, to $50.5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $58.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in net income was primarily attributable to the decrease in interest and other income as
well as the impairment loss on investment securities recognized during the three months ended June
30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007.
37
However these increases were partially offset by an increase in operating income as well as
decreases in interest expense and provision for income taxes.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
746,872 |
|
|
$ |
693,481 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
413,660 |
|
|
|
225,376 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,160,532 |
|
|
$ |
918,857 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
107,880 |
|
|
$ |
120,370 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
72,749 |
|
|
|
48,635 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
180,629 |
|
|
$ |
169,005 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
217,909 |
|
|
$ |
211,046 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
176,705 |
|
|
|
96,516 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
394,614 |
|
|
$ |
307,562 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
197,889 |
|
|
$ |
202,929 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
162,356 |
|
|
|
103,818 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
360,245 |
|
|
$ |
306,747 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization disclosed
separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
87,825 |
|
|
$ |
87,684 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
129,968 |
|
|
|
67,970 |
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
217,793 |
|
|
$ |
155,654 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
357,861 |
|
|
$ |
318,191 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
30,120 |
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
160 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
64,236 |
|
|
$ |
56,317 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
44,508 |
|
|
|
21,597 |
|
|
|
106 |
% |
Other |
|
|
9,444 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
265 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,188 |
|
|
$ |
80,504 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
6,732 |
|
|
$ |
5,999 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
|
5,865 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,472 |
|
|
$ |
11,864 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
284,262 |
|
|
$ |
253,626 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(27,142 |
) |
|
|
(16,084 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(9,448 |
) |
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
247,672 |
|
|
$ |
234,738 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, cost of service includes $1.2
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $18.3 million of stock-based
compensation expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, cost of service includes $0.7
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $11.2 million of stock-based
compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our
ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and
to fund future growth. |
38
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $241.7 million, or 26%, to $1.2 billion for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 from $918.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $53.4 million, or 8%, to $746.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $693.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to net customer
additions of approximately 273,000 customers for the twelve months ended June 30, 2008,
which accounted for $81.4 million of the Core Markets increase, partially offset by the
higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from certain features now
included in our service plans that were previously provided a la carte, accounting for a
$19.8 million decrease. In addition, consolidated E-911, Federal Universal Service Fund,
or FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased $13.5 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase is
primarily attributable to a 30% increase in our consolidated customer base since June 30,
2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1, 2008, a portion of these revenues were
allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of $21.7 million resulting in a net
decrease of $8.2 million in the Core Markets for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $188.3 million, or 84%,
to $413.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $225.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to
net customer additions of approximately 775,000 customers for the twelve months ended June
30, 2008, which accounted for $183.9 million of the Expansion Markets increase, partially
offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from certain
features now included in our service plans that were previously provided a la carte,
accounting for a $17.3 million decrease. In addition, E-911, FUSF, vendors compensation
and activation revenues increased approximately $21.7 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the allocation of a
portion of these revenues to the Expansion Markets beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $11.6 million, or 7%, to $180.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $169.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues, partially offset
by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $12.5 million, or 10%, to
$107.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $120.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily attributable
to the sale of lower priced handset models accounting for $14.1 million of the decrease
coupled with a decrease in gross customer additions which accounted for $1.3 million.
These decreases in equipment revenues were partially offset by an increase in upgrade
handset sales to existing customers which accounted for a $2.0 million increase in
equipment revenues as well as an increase in accessory sales accounting for $0.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $24.1 million, or
50%, to $72.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $48.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily attributable
to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 290,000 customers for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, which accounted for
$16.2 million of the Expansion Markets increase, an increase in upgrade handset sales to
existing customers accounting for a $15.3 million increase and an increase of approximately
$1.8 million in additional accessory sales. These increases in equipment revenues were
partially offset by the sale of lower priced handset models which accounted for a $9.2
million decrease. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $87.0 million, or 28%, to $394.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 from $307.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $6.9 million, or 3%, to $217.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $211.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. Core Markets cost |
39
|
|
|
of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses) increased $13.2 million, or 8%, to
$178.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $165.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to the 11% growth in our Core
Markets customer base and the deployment of additional network infrastructure during the
twelve months ended June 30, 2008. In addition, consolidated E-911, FUSF, and NECA/TRS
expenses increased $14.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to a 30% increase in our
consolidated customer base since June 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January
1, 2008, a portion of these expenses were allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of
$20.7 million resulting in a net decrease of $6.3 million in the Core Markets for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $80.1 million, or 83%,
to $176.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $96.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. Expansion Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and
NECA/TRS expenses) increased $59.5 million, or 62%, to $154.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from $95.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily attributable to the 77% growth in our Expansion Markets customer
base, coupled with expenses associated with the launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las
Vegas and Jacksonville metropolitan areas as well as the build-out expenses related to the
New York, Philadelphia and Boston metropolitan areas. In addition, E-911, FUSF and
NECA/TRS expenses increased approximately $20.7 million during the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the allocation of a portion
of these expenses to the Expansion Markets beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $53.5 million, or 17%, to $360.2 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $306.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment, partially offset
by a decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $5.0 million, or 2%, to $197.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $202.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment is primarily attributable to
the sale of lower priced handsets accounting for $4.9 million of the decrease as well as
the decrease in gross customer additions which accounted for $4.2 million of the decrease
when compared to the same period in 2007. These increases were partially offset by an
increase in upgrade handset sales to existing customers accounting for $2.4 million as well
as an increase of $1.4 million in handset refurbishment expenses and an increase in cost of
accessories due to an increase in accessory sales accounting for a $0.3 million increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $58.5 million, or 56%,
to $162.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $103.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment is
primarily attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 290,000
customers for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007,
which accounted for $39.1 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the sale
of handsets to existing customers accounting for $21.9 million of the increase as well as
an increase of $1.9 million in handset refurbishment expenses and an increase in cost of
accessories due to an increase in accessory sales accounting for a $0.7 million increase.
These increases were partially offset by the sale of lower priced handsets accounting for a
$5.1 million decrease in Expansion Markets cost of equipment. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $62.1 million, or 40%, to $217.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from
$155.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an
increase in Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.1
million to $87.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $87.7 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by $5.5 million, or 15% for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase in selling expenses is primarily due to a $3.3 million increase |
40
|
|
|
in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth in the Core Markets and
a $2.2 million increase related to FUSF billings that were allocated to selling expenses
beginning January 1, 2008. General and administrative expenses decreased $5.4 million, or
11% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily
to a decrease in various administrative expenses incurred as a result of cost benefits
achieved due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $62.0 million, or 91%, to $130.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008
from $68.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by
$30.8 million, or 115% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2007. This increase is primarily due to a $17.4 million increase in
marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth in the Expansion Markets
as well as higher employee related costs of $7.8 million to support the growth and buildout
of the Expansion Markets. General and administrative expenses increased by $31.2 million,
or approximately 76% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 primarily due to the 77% growth in our Expansion Markets customer base as well as the
build-out expenses related to the New York, Philadelphia and Boston metropolitan areas. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $37.7 million,
or 47%, to $118.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $80.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $7.9
million, or 14%, to $64.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $56.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase related primarily to an increase in
network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months ended June 30,
2008 to support our continued growth. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$22.9 million, or 106%, to $44.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $21.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase related primarily to an
increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended June 30, 2008 driven primarily by the launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas
and Jacksonville metropolitan areas. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $7.6 million, or
64%, to $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $11.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to increases in Core Markets and Expansion
Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $0.7 million, or
12%, to $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $6.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase in stock
options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended June 30,
2008. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $6.9
million, or 117%, to $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $5.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase
in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended
June 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
93,083 |
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
62,159 |
|
|
|
63,307 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Net income |
|
|
89,984 |
|
|
|
94,446 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
41
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $5.0 million, or 5%, to $93.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $98.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease
in interest expense was primarily due to the capitalization of $28.9 million of interest during the
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $12.9 million of interest capitalized during the same
period in 2007. We capitalize interest costs associated with our FCC licenses and property and
equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of such capitalized interest depends
on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in progress involved in those markets
and the duration of the construction process. We expect capitalized interest to be significant
during the construction of the Auction 66 Markets. In addition, our weighted average interest rate
decreased to 7.83% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 8.18% for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 as a result of the borrowing rates under the senior secured credit facility.
Average debt outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $3.0 billion compared to the
average debt outstanding for the six months ending June 30, 2007 of $2.7 billion. The increase in
average debt outstanding was due to the issuance of an additional $400.0 million principal amount
of our 91/4% senior notes in June 2007.
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased $6.4 million, or 30%, to $15.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $21.7 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007. The decrease in interest and other income was primarily due to the Company investing
substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in money market funds consisting of U.S.
treasury securities rather than in short-term investments as the Company has done historically.
For further discussion see Note 4 to the financial statements included in this report.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our
substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the
United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money
market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. We made an original investment of $133.9 million
in principal in certain auction rate securities that were rated AAA/Aaa at the time of purchase,
substantially all of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the
underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. With the
liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held
by us at June 30, 2008 have experienced continued failed auctions as the amount of securities
submitted for sale in the auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. We recognized an
additional other-than-temporary impairment loss on investment securities in the amount of $17.1
million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $62.2 million and $63.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate was 40.9% and 40.1% for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our effective rates differ from the
statutory federal rate of 35% for state and local taxes, non-deductible expenses and an increase in
the valuation allowance which was related to the impairment loss recognized on investment
securities during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Net Income. Net income decreased $4.5 million, or 5%, to $90.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $94.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease
in net income was primarily attributable to the decrease in interest and other income as well as
the impairment loss on investment securities recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008
as compared to the same period in 2007. However these increases were partially offset by an
increase in operating income as well as a decrease in interest expense.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, we supplement the
information provided by financial statement measures with several customer-focused performance
metrics that are widely used in the wireless industry. These metrics include average revenue per
user per month, or ARPU, which measures service revenue per customer; cost per gross customer
addition, or CPGA, which measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer; cost per user per
month, or CPU, which measures the non-selling cash cost of operating our business on a per customer
basis; and churn, which measures turnover in our customer base. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP
performance measures and a further discussion of the measures, please read Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
42
The following table shows consolidated metric information for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
4,598,049 |
|
|
|
3,549,916 |
|
|
|
4,598,049 |
|
|
|
3,549,916 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
183,530 |
|
|
|
154,713 |
|
|
|
635,263 |
|
|
|
608,930 |
|
Churn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
41.77 |
|
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
|
$ |
41.98 |
|
|
$ |
43.46 |
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
135.90 |
|
|
$ |
124.79 |
|
|
$ |
127.86 |
|
|
$ |
115.87 |
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.23 |
|
|
$ |
18.01 |
|
|
$ |
18.53 |
|
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
Customers. Net customer additions were 183,530 for the three months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to 154,713 for the three months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of approximately 19%.
Net customer additions were 635,263 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 608,930 for
the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of 4%. Total customers were 4,598,049 as of June
30, 2008, an increase of approximately 30% over the customer total as of June 30, 2007 and 16% over
the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and the launch of our services in
the Los Angeles metropolitan area in September 2007 as well as our launches of service in the Las
Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008 and the Jacksonville metropolitan area in April 2008.
Churn. As we do not require a long-term service contract, we expect our churn percentage to be
higher than traditional wireless carriers that require customers to sign a one- to two-year
contract with significant early termination fees. Average monthly churn represents (a) the number
of customers who have been disconnected from our service during the measurement period less the
number of customers who have reactivated service, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly
number of customers during such period. We classify delinquent customers as churn after they have
been delinquent for 30 days. In addition, when an existing customer establishes a new account in
connection with the purchase of an upgraded or replacement phone and does not identify themselves
as an existing customer, we count that phone leaving service as a churn and the new phone entering
service as a gross customer addition. Churn for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was
4.5% and 4.8%, respectively. Churn for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was 4.3% and
4.4%, respectively. Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional
retail selling periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on
historical results, we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and
fourth quarters. Softening of sales and increased churn in the second and third quarters of the
year usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions during these quarters.
Average Revenue Per User. ARPU represents (a) service revenues less activation revenues,
E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation charges for the measurement period, divided by (b) the sum of
the average monthly number of customers during such period. ARPU was $41.77 and $43.18 for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a decrease of $1.41. ARPU was $41.98 and
$43.46 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a decrease of $1.48. The
decrease in ARPU for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, when compared to the same
periods in 2007, was primarily attributable to higher participation in our Family Plans as well as
reduced revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were previously
provided a la carte.
Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA is determined by dividing (a) selling expenses plus the total
cost of equipment associated with transactions with new customers less activation revenues and
equipment revenues associated with transactions with new customers during the measurement period by
(b) gross customer additions during such period. Retail customer service expenses and equipment
margin on handsets sold to existing customers when they are identified, including handset upgrade
transactions, are excluded, as these costs are incurred specifically for existing customers. CPGA
costs have increased to $135.90 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $124.79 for the three
months ended June 30, 2007. CPGA costs have increased to $127.86 for the six months ended June 30,
2008 from $115.87 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in CPGA for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 when compared to the same periods in 2007, were primarily driven by
selling expenses associated with the continued customer growth in our Expansion Markets including
the launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan area as well as our recent launches of
service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008 and
the Jacksonville metropolitan area in April 2008.
43
Cost Per User. CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding
applicable non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on handset equipment transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and
costs associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)), divided by the sum of the average monthly number of
customers during such period. CPU for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $18.23 and
$18.01, respectively. CPU for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $18.53 and $18.28,
respectively. We continue to achieve cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business.
However, these benefits have been more than offset by a combination of construction and launch
expenses associated with our Expansion Markets, which contributed approximately $3.70 and $3.18 of
additional CPU for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and approximately
$3.66 and $3.01 of additional CPU for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Core Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Core Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Core Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,815,353 |
|
|
|
2,542,290 |
|
|
|
2,815,353 |
|
|
|
2,542,290 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
19,437 |
|
|
|
57,479 |
|
|
|
156,448 |
|
|
|
241,332 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
187,335 |
|
|
$ |
167,869 |
|
|
$ |
357,861 |
|
|
$ |
318,191 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a Percent of
Service Revenues |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
47.9 |
% |
|
|
45.9 |
% |
As of June 30, 2008, our networks in our Core Markets cover a population of approximately 23
million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Core Markets were 19,437 for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to 57,479 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net customer additions
in our Core Markets were 156,448 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to 241,332 for
the six months ended June 30, 2007. Total customers were 2,815,353 as of June 30, 2008, an
increase of approximately 11% over the customer total as of June 30, 2007 and approximately 6% over
the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $187.3 million compared to $167.9 million for
the same period in 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was
$357.9 million compared to $318.2 million for the same period in 2007. We continue to experience
increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a result of continued customer growth and cost
benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were
49.6% and 47.1%, respectively. Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were 47.9% and 45.9%, respectively. Consistent with
the increase in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to experience corresponding increases in
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due to the growth in service revenues
as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
44
Expansion Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Expansion Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Expansion Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
1,782,696 |
|
|
|
1,007,626 |
|
|
|
1,782,696 |
|
|
|
1,007,626 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
164,093 |
|
|
|
97,234 |
|
|
|
478,815 |
|
|
|
367,598 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
22,832 |
|
|
$ |
12,577 |
|
|
$ |
30,120 |
|
|
$ |
11,572 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a Percent of Service
Revenues |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
As of June 30, 2008, our networks in our Expansion Markets cover a population of approximately
34 million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 164,093 for the three months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to 97,234 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net customer
additions in our Expansion Markets were 478,815 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
367,598 for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net customer additions is
primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings as well as the continued
expansion of our service footprint in the Los Angeles metropolitan area and our recent launches of
service in the Las Vegas and the Jacksonville metropolitan areas. Total customers were 1,782,696
as of June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately 77% over the customer total as of June 30, 2007
and an increase of approximately 37% over the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase
in total customers is primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and
the continued growth of our service footprint in the Los Angeles metropolitan area since our launch
in September 2007 as well as our launches of service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area and the
Jacksonville metropolitan area.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $22.8 million compared to an Adjusted
EBITDA of $12.6 million for the same period in 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008,
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $30.1 million compared to an Adjusted EBITDA of $11.6 million
for the same period in 2007. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA, when compared to the same period in
the previous year, was attributable to cost benefits achieved due to the increasing scale of our
business, offset by construction and launch expenses associated primarily with the launch of
service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Jacksonville metropolitan areas and the buildout of our
Auction 66 Markets in the Northeast.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Expansion Markets
Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
were 10.3% and 10.2%, respectively. Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were 7.3% and 5.1%, respectively.
Consistent with the increase in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to experience
corresponding increases in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due
to the growth in service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business in the Expansion Markets.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We utilize certain financial measures and key performance indicators that are not calculated
in accordance with GAAP to assess our financial and operating performance. A non-GAAP financial
measure is defined as a numerical measure of a companys financial performance that (i) excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included
in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of
income or statement of cash flows; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have
the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated
and presented.
45
ARPU, CPGA, and CPU are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management to judge our
ability to meet our liquidity requirements and to evaluate our operating performance. We believe
these measures are important in understanding the performance of our operations from period to
period, and although every company in the wireless industry does not define each of these measures
in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures (which are common in the wireless
industry) facilitate key liquidity and operating performance comparisons with other companies in
the wireless industry. The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures with our
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
ARPU We utilize ARPU to evaluate our per-customer service revenue realization and to assist
in forecasting our future service revenues. ARPU is calculated exclusive of activation revenues,
as these amounts are a component of our costs of acquiring new customers and are included in our
calculation of CPGA. ARPU is also calculated exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors
compensation revenues, as these are generally pass through charges that we collect from our
customers and remit to the appropriate government agencies.
Average number of customers for any measurement period is determined by dividing (a) the sum
of the average monthly number of customers for the measurement period by (b) the number of months
in such period. Average monthly number of customers for any month represents the sum of the number
of customers on the first day of the month and the last day of the month divided by two. The
following table shows the calculation of ARPU for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and ARPU) |
|
Calculation of Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
598,562 |
|
|
$ |
479,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,160,532 |
|
|
$ |
918,857 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation revenues |
|
|
(3,899 |
) |
|
|
(2,683 |
) |
|
|
(7,525 |
) |
|
|
(5,142 |
) |
E-911, FUSF and vendors
compensation charges |
|
|
(30,583 |
) |
|
|
(25,721 |
) |
|
|
(57,137 |
) |
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenues |
|
$ |
564,080 |
|
|
$ |
450,937 |
|
|
$ |
1,095,870 |
|
|
$ |
867,723 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,501,980 |
|
|
|
3,480,780 |
|
|
|
4,350,387 |
|
|
|
3,328,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU |
|
$ |
41.77 |
|
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
|
$ |
41.98 |
|
|
$ |
43.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA We utilize CPGA to assess the efficiency of our distribution strategy, validate the
initial capital invested in our customers and determine the number of months to recover our
customer acquisition costs. This measure also allows us to compare our average acquisition costs
per new customer to those of other wireless broadband PCS providers. Activation revenues and
equipment revenues related to new customers are deducted from selling expenses in this calculation
as they represent amounts paid by customers at the time their service is activated that reduce our
acquisition cost of those customers. Additionally, equipment costs associated with existing
customers, net of related revenues, are excluded as this measure is intended to reflect only the
acquisition costs related to new customers. The following table reconciles total costs used in the
calculation of CPGA to selling expenses, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure to CPGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except gross customer |
|
|
|
additions and CPGA) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per Gross Addition (CPGA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
$ |
53,180 |
|
|
$ |
33,365 |
|
|
$ |
99,827 |
|
|
$ |
63,471 |
|
Less: Activation revenues |
|
|
(3,899 |
) |
|
|
(2,683 |
) |
|
|
(7,525 |
) |
|
|
(5,142 |
) |
Less: Equipment revenues |
|
|
(80,245 |
) |
|
|
(71,835 |
) |
|
|
(180,629 |
) |
|
|
(169,005 |
) |
Add: Equipment revenue not associated with new customers |
|
|
37,613 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
|
|
83,416 |
|
|
|
75,902 |
|
Add: Cost of equipment |
|
|
160,088 |
|
|
|
133,439 |
|
|
|
360,245 |
|
|
|
306,747 |
|
Less: Equipment costs not associated with new customers |
|
|
(58,993 |
) |
|
|
(43,795 |
) |
|
|
(131,204 |
) |
|
|
(98,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross addition expenses |
|
$ |
107,744 |
|
|
$ |
82,383 |
|
|
$ |
224,130 |
|
|
$ |
173,009 |
|
Divided by: Gross customer additions |
|
|
792,823 |
|
|
|
660,149 |
|
|
|
1,752,906 |
|
|
|
1,493,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
135.90 |
|
|
$ |
124.79 |
|
|
$ |
127.86 |
|
|
$ |
115.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
CPU CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding applicable
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on equipment transactions unrelated to initial customer
acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and costs
associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)) exclusive of E-911, FUSF, and vendors
compensation charges, divided by the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such
period. CPU does not include any depreciation and amortization expense. Management uses CPU as a
tool to evaluate the non-selling cash expenses associated with ongoing business operations on a per
customer basis, to track changes in these non-selling cash costs over time, and to help evaluate
how changes in our business operations affect non-selling cash costs per customer. In addition,
CPU provides management with a useful measure to compare our non-selling cash costs per customer
with those of other wireless providers. We believe investors use CPU primarily as a tool to track
changes in our non-selling cash costs over time and to compare our non-selling cash costs to those
of other wireless providers, although other wireless carriers may calculate this measure
differently. The following table reconciles total costs used in the calculation of CPU to cost of
service, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and CPU) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per User (CPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service |
|
$ |
206,140 |
|
|
$ |
162,227 |
|
|
$ |
394,614 |
|
|
$ |
307,562 |
|
Add: General and administrative expense |
|
|
60,239 |
|
|
|
49,352 |
|
|
|
117,966 |
|
|
|
92,183 |
|
Add: Net loss on equipment
transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition |
|
|
21,380 |
|
|
|
9,903 |
|
|
|
47,788 |
|
|
|
23,062 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense
included in cost of service and
general and administrative expense |
|
|
(11,007 |
) |
|
|
(7,653 |
) |
|
|
(19,472 |
) |
|
|
(11,864 |
) |
Less: E-911, FUSF, and
vendors compensation revenues |
|
|
(30,583 |
) |
|
|
(25,721 |
) |
|
|
(57,137 |
) |
|
|
(45,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs used in the calculation of CPU |
|
$ |
246,169 |
|
|
$ |
188,108 |
|
|
$ |
483,759 |
|
|
$ |
364,951 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,501,980 |
|
|
|
3,480,780 |
|
|
|
4,350,387 |
|
|
|
3,328,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.23 |
|
|
$ |
18.01 |
|
|
$ |
18.53 |
|
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash
generated from operations. At June 30, 2008, we had a total of approximately $1.1 billion in cash
and cash equivalents. We have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other
things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated
commercial paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and
demand deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate
risk. At June 30, 2008, we had invested substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in
money market funds consisting of U.S. treasury securities.
We made an original investment of $133.9 million in principal in certain auction rate
securities, substantially all of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a
portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities.
Consistent with our investment policy guidelines, the auction rate securities investments held by
us all had AAA/Aaa credit ratings at the time of purchase. With the liquidity issues experienced
in global credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held by us at June 30, 2008 have
experienced continued failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the
auctions has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. In addition, substantially all of the auction
rate securities held by us have been downgraded or placed on credit watch by at least one credit
rating agency.
The estimated market value of our auction rate security holdings at June 30, 2008 was
approximately $19.7 million, which reflects a $114.2 million adjustment to the original principal
value of $133.9 million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was approximately $36.1
million, which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the principal value at that date. Although
the auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated terms, based on
statements received from our broker and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors, we
recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million and $17.1 million during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, reflecting an additional portion of auction rate security
holdings that we have concluded have an
47
other-than-temporary decline in value. The offsetting increase in fair value of approximately
$0.7 million is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance
sheets, net of income taxes in the amount of $0.2 million.
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, our auction rate securities were
presented as current assets under short-term investments on our balance sheet. Given the failed
auctions, our auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a successful auction for them.
Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining auction rate securities has been reclassified from
current to non-current assets and is presented in long-term investments on our balance sheet as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The $114.9 million impairment charges recorded to date does
not have a material impact on our liquidity and is not included in our approximately $1.1 billion
in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2008. If uncertainties in the credit and capital
markets continue or these markets deteriorate further, we may incur additional impairments to its
auction rate securities. Management believes that any future additional impairment charges will
not have a material effect on our liquidity.
Our strategy has been to offer our services in major metropolitan areas and their surrounding
areas, which we refer to as clusters. We are seeking opportunities to enhance our current market
clusters and to provide service in new geographic areas. From time to time, we may purchase
spectrum and related assets from third parties or the FCC. We participated as a bidder in FCC
Auction 66 and in November 2006 we were granted eight licenses for a total aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.4 billion. We participated as a bidder in Auction 73 and on June 26, 2008, we
were granted the 700 MHz License for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $313.3 million.
The 700 MHz License supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless spectrum previously granted to us
in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result
of Auction 66.
As a result of the acquisition of the spectrum licenses from Auction 66 and the opportunities
that these licenses provide for us to expand our operations into major metropolitan markets, we
will require significant additional capital in the future to finance the construction and initial
operating costs associated with such licenses. We generally do not intend to commence the
construction of any individual license area until we have sufficient funds available to provide for
the related construction and operating costs associated with such license area. We currently plan
to focus on building out approximately 40 million of the total population in our Auction 66 Markets
with a primary focus on the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. We
launched service in the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008 and in the Philadelphia
metropolitan area in July 2008. Of the approximate 40 million total population, we are targeting
launch of operations with an initial covered population of approximately 30 to 32 million by late
2008 through the first half of 2009. Our initial launch dates will vary in our Auction 66 Markets
and our launch dates in the larger metropolitan areas will be accomplished in phases. Our Auction
66 Markets will entail a more extensive use of DAS systems than we have deployed in the past.
This, along with other factors, could result in an increase in the total capital expenditures per
covered population to initially launch operations, however, we would not expect the estimate of
total cash expenditures to reach free cash flow positive to be materially impacted. We believe
that our existing cash, cash equivalents and our anticipated cash flows from operations will be
sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
The construction of our network and the marketing and distribution of our wireless
communications products and services have required, and will continue to require, substantial
capital investment. Capital outlays have included license acquisition costs, capital expenditures
for construction of our network infrastructure, costs associated with clearing and relocating
non-governmental incumbent licenses, funding of operating cash flow losses incurred as we launch
services in new metropolitan areas and other working capital costs, debt service and financing fees
and expenses. Our capital expenditures for the first six months of 2008 were approximately $388.5
million and aggregate capital expenditures for 2007 were approximately $767.7 million. These
expenditures were primarily associated with the construction of the network infrastructure in our
Expansion Markets and our efforts to increase the service area and capacity of our existing Core
Markets network through the addition of cell sites and switches. We believe the increased service
area and capacity in existing markets will improve our service offering, helping us to attract
additional customers and increase revenues. In addition, we believe our new Expansion Markets have
attractive demographics which will result in increased revenues.
As of June 30, 2008, we owed an aggregate of approximately $3.0 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and 91/4% senior notes. As of June 30, 2008, we owed approximately $27.0
million under capital lease obligations.
Our senior secured credit facility calculates consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as: consolidated
net income plus depreciation and amortization; gain (loss) on disposal of assets; non-cash
expenses; gain (loss) on extinguishment of
48
debt; provision for income taxes; interest expense; and certain expenses of MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. minus interest and other income and non-cash items increasing consolidated net
income.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, to be an important indicator to investors
because it provides information related to our ability to provide cash flows to meet future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and fund future growth. We present
this discussion of Adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our senior secured credit facility contain
ratios based on this measure. Other wireless carriers may calculate
Adjusted EBITDA differently. If our Adjusted EBITDA were to decline below certain levels,
covenants in our senior secured credit facility that are based on Adjusted EBITDA, including our
maximum senior secured leverage ratio covenant, may be violated and could cause, among other
things, an inability to incur further indebtedness and in certain circumstances a default or
mandatory prepayment under our senior secured credit facility. Our maximum senior secured leverage
ratio is required to be less than 4.5 to 1.0 based on Adjusted EBITDA plus the impact of certain
new markets. The lenders under our senior secured credit facility use the senior secured leverage
ratio to measure our ability to meet our obligations on our senior secured debt by comparing the
total amount of such debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, which our lenders use to estimate our cash flow
from operations. The senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of senior secured
indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. For the twelve
months ended June 30, 2008, our senior secured leverage ratio was 1.98 to 1.0, which means for
every $1.00 of Adjusted EBITDA we had $1.98 of senior secured indebtedness. In addition,
consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is also utilized, among other measures, to determine managements
compensation levels. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for, operating income, net income, or any other measure of
financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA should not be
construed as an alternative to, or more meaningful than cash flows from operating activities, as
determined in accordance with GAAP.
The following table shows the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
our senior secured credit facility, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Calculation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
50,465 |
|
|
$ |
58,094 |
|
|
$ |
89,984 |
|
|
$ |
94,446 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
60,888 |
|
|
|
41,124 |
|
|
|
118,188 |
|
|
|
80,504 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (1) |
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
45,664 |
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
|
|
93,083 |
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary (1) |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
35,491 |
|
|
|
39,040 |
|
|
|
62,159 |
|
|
|
63,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
210,167 |
|
|
$ |
180,446 |
|
|
$ |
387,981 |
|
|
$ |
329,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a non-cash expense, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. |
49
In addition, for further information, the following table reconciles consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, to cash flows from operating activities
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
223,969 |
|
|
$ |
155,737 |
|
|
$ |
331,418 |
|
|
$ |
267,309 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
45,664 |
|
|
|
49,168 |
|
|
|
93,083 |
|
|
|
98,144 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(2,048 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
(14,494 |
) |
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
|
(21,651 |
) |
(Provision for) recovery of uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
(6,970 |
) |
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
|
|
(12,967 |
) |
|
|
(4,265 |
) |
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
(2,322 |
) |
|
|
(3,832 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
35,491 |
|
|
|
39,040 |
|
|
|
62,159 |
|
|
|
63,307 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(34,246 |
) |
|
|
(38,547 |
) |
|
|
(59,794 |
) |
|
|
(62,158 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
(46,300 |
) |
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
(5,768 |
) |
|
|
(6,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
210,167 |
|
|
$ |
180,446 |
|
|
$ |
387,981 |
|
|
$ |
329,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $331.4 million during the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to $267.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to a $37.7 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense
associated with the increased asset purchases and construction in the Expansion Markets, $17.1
million in impairment losses recognized on investment securities and a $7.6 million increase in
non-cash stock-based compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $703.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to $1.5 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was due primarily
to a $1.2 billion decrease in net purchases of investments that occurred during the six months
ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was partially
offset by an increase attributable to $313.3 million in purchases of FCC licenses as a result of
participation in Auction 73, $25.2 million in cash used for business acquisitions and a $41.4
million increase in purchases of property and equipment which was primarily related to construction
in the Expansion Markets.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $30.5 million during the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to $1.3 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was due
primarily to $818.2 million in net proceeds from the Companys initial public offering that was
completed in April 2007 and $420.5 million in net proceeds from the issuance of the additional
notes in June 2007 that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
50
Capital Lease Obligations
During 2007, the Company entered into various non-cancelable DAS capital lease agreements,
with expirations through 2023, covering dedicated optical fiber. Assets and future obligations
related to capital leases are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in property
and equipment and long-term debt, respectively. Depreciation of assets held under capital lease
obligations is included in depreciation and amortization expense.
As of June 30, 2008, we had DAS capital lease agreements in operation in three metropolitan
areas including Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia.
Capital Expenditures and Other Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
Capital Expenditures. We and Royal Street currently expect to incur capital expenditures in
the range of $1.1 billion to $1.3 billion for the year ending December 31, 2008 in our Core and
Expansion Markets, which includes $600.0 million to $700.0 million in our Auction 66 Markets. In
addition, we have spent $313.3 million for the purchase of spectrum in Auction 73 for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we and Royal Street incurred $388.5 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Boston,
Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia Expansion Markets.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we and Royal Street incurred $767.7 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, which was launched in September 2007.
Other Acquisitions and Dispositions. On December 21, 2007, the Company executed an agreement
with PTA Communications, Inc., or PTA, to purchase 10 MHz of PCS spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of Jacksonville, Florida. The Company also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc.
(dba Cleartalk PCS) and PTA-FLA, Inc. for the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing
PCS wireless telecommunications services in the Jacksonville market. On January 17, 2008, the
Company closed on the acquisition of certain assets used in providing PCS wireless services. The
Company paid a total of $18.6 million in cash for these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On
May 13, 2008, the Company closed on the purchase of the 10 MHz of spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of Jacksonville, Florida for consideration of $6.5 million in cash.
We participated as a bidder in Auction 73 and on June 26, 2008, we were granted the 700 MHz
License for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $313.3 million. The 700 MHz License
supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless spectrum previously granted to us in the
Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result of
Auction 66.
We have entered into various agreements for the acquisition of spectrum in the aggregate
amount of approximately $15.0 million. Consummation of these
acquisitions is conditioned upon
customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We believe that inflation has not materially affected our operations.
51
Effect of New Accounting Standards
We believe that the adoption of new accounting standards has not materially affected our
results of operations. For further discussion see Note 19 to the financial statements included in
this report.
Fair Value Measurements
We do not expect changes in the aggregate fair value of our financial assets and liabilities
to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 10 to the financial
statements included in this report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates,
including interest rates. We do not routinely enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading, speculative or hedging purposes, unless it is hedging interest rate risk
exposure or is required by our senior secured credit facility. We do not currently conduct
business internationally, so we are generally not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $1.6 billion in outstanding indebtedness under our
senior secured credit facility that bears interest at floating rates based on the London Inter Bank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding debt under our senior
secured credit facility as of June 30, 2008 was 6.516%. On November 21, 2006, to manage our
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of our senior secured credit facility, we
entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement. This agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to
fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on
February 1, 2007. The interest rate swap agreement expires in 2010. On April 30, 2008, to manage
our interest rate risk exposure, we entered into a two-year interest rate protection agreement.
The agreement is effective on June 30, 2008, covers a notional
amount of $500.0 million and
effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of
5.46%. The monthly interest settlement periods began on June 30, 2008. The interest rate
protection agreement expires on June 30, 2010. If market LIBOR rates increase 100 basis points
over the rates in effect at June 30, 2008, annual interest expense on the approximately $72.0
million in variable rate debt would increase approximately $0.7 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported as required by the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for appropriate and timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with participation by our CEO and CFO,
has designed the Companys disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving these desired objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we conducted an evaluation,
with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this
report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is
necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and objectives. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2008 in timely making known to them
material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed in
our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the first quarter of 2008 and effective as of April 1, 2008, the Company completed its
accounting system conversion from Solomon Accounting Software to Oracle Enterprise Business Suite
(Oracle ERP). Management
52
has redesigned and evaluated our internal controls over financial reporting for the new Oracle
ERP environment and ensured that our controls and procedures are effective. There have been no
other changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
53
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against MetroPCS in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June 16, 2006,
for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services
and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by Leap. The complaint
seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees,
for our alleged willful infringement by our wireless communication systems and associated services
of the 497 patent. We have answered the complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses, and
together with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities and
certain current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In our counterclaims, we claim
that we do not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent and we assert claims for
constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and
disclosure of trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, breach of a
confidential relationship, and fraud. Our counterclaims seek monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, have answered our counterclaims, denied
our allegations and asserted affirmative defenses to our counterclaims. In connection with denying
a motion to dismiss by certain individual defendants, the court concluded that our claims against
those defendants were compulsory counterclaims.
On May 16, 2008, the Court entered an order consolidating this action with the action brought
by Royal Street Communications described below for the purposes of discovery. On May 23, 2008,
the Court scheduled the claim construction hearing for both this action and the Royal Street
Communications action for late October 2008 and trial setting for April 2009. On July 1, 2008, the
Court entered an order accepting for filing a second amended complaint which added MetroPCS wholly
owned subsidiaries as additional defendants and dropped Leap Wireless International, Inc. as a
plaintiff. We plan to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497 Patent and to
vigorously prosecute our counterclaims against Leap.
We also have tendered Leaps claims to the manufacturer of our network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent declined to indemnify and
defend us. We filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County, Texas, Cause No.
07-0710, for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend
and hold us harmless from the Leap patent infringement action and for specific performance, for
injunctive relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel Lucent has responded to our petition and
requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny every claim in our petition asserted
against Alcatel Lucent and order us to amend our petition. We have responded to Alcatel Lucents
request. The parties have agreed to postpone the hearing on Alcatel Lucents request. No hearing is
currently scheduled for Alcatel Lucents request. We intend to vigorously prosecute our action.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications, LLC, or Royal Street Communications, filed
a separate action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Division, Civil Action No. 8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497
Patent is invalid and not being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. Leap responded to
Royal Street Communications complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal Street Communications
complaint for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action be transferred to the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, where Leap has
brought suit against the Company under the same patent. Royal Street Communications responded to
this motion, but the Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW,
where it remains pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against
Royal Street Communications, alleging that Royal Street Communications willfully infringes the
497 Patent and seeking both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and
attorneys fees, for Royal Street Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless
communication systems and associated services of the 497 patent. Leap also filed a motion to
consolidate this action with the Leap action against us. On May 16, 2008, the Court entered an
order consolidating this action with the action brought by Leap against MetroPCS solely for the
purposes of discovery.
54
On May 23, 2008, the Court scheduled the claims construction hearing for this action and the
Leap action described above for late October 2008 and on June 20, 2008 the parties filed a proposed
docket control order which requests that the Court stay the trial setting in this action pending
entry of Final Judgment in the Leap action directly against MetroPCS. Royal Street Communications
plans to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, we and Royal
Street Communications could be enjoined from operating our respective businesses in the manner in
which we and Royal Street Communications currently operate, could require us and Royal Street
Communications to expend additional capital to change certain technologies and operating practices,
or could prevent both us and Royal Street Communications from offering some or all of the services
we each provide using some or all of our or Royal Street Communications existing systems. In
addition, if Leap were successful in its claim for monetary damages, we and Royal Street
Communications could be forced to pay Leap substantial damages, including treble damages if found
to have willfully infringed the 497 Patent, for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a
portion of both our revenues, which could materially adversely impact our and Royal Street
Communications financial performance. Further, if Leap were successful, we and/or Royal Street
Communications could be required to pay Leaps attorneys fees.
On August 15, 2006, we filed a separate action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus
County, Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective
business advantage, and trespass. In this action we seek monetary and punitive damages and
injunctive relief. We have amended our complaint in response to demurrers and motions filed by Leap
and Orders of the Court. On August 16, 2007, we filed our Third Amended Complaint which among other
things eliminated the trespass claims. On September 20, 2007, Defendants demurred to the Third
Amended Complaint alleging that the claims were uncertain and we have responded. On October 24,
2007, the parties filed a stipulation to request that the Court stay the action and discovery for
90 days following the entry of the Order granting the stay. On May 27, 2008, the Court reopened the
action and has set the next scheduling conference for September 22, 2008. On July 31, 2008, the
Court entered a tentative ruling denying Defendants demurrer to our Third Amended Complaint. We
plan to vigorously prosecute this action.
On January 7, 2008, Freedom Wireless, Inc., or Freedom Wireless, filed an action against
Verisign, Inc., our billing vendor, and several telecommunications providers who use Verisigns
billing system, including us, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California, San Francisco Division, Civil Action Number CV-08-112-JL, for infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 5,722,067 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, U.S. Patent No.
6,157,823 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, and U.S. Patent No. 6,236,851
entitled Prepaid Security Cellular Telecommunications System, or collectively the Freedom
Wireless Patents, held by Freedom Wireless. The complaint sought both injunctive relief and
monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for our alleged willful
infringement of the Freedom Wireless Patents. On May 20, 2008, Freedom Wireless dismissed without
prejudice its action against us. By dismissing its action without prejudice, Freedom Wireless
reserves the right in the future to bring an action against us for the same matters contained in
the action it dismissed against us.
In addition, we are involved in other litigation from time to time, including litigation
regarding intellectual property claims, that we consider to be in the normal course of business. We
are not currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that we believe would, individually
or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
55
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC
on February 29, 2008 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
filed with the SEC on May 9, 2008, other than the changes and additions to the Risk Factors set
forth below.
Risks Related to Our Business
We may be unable to obtain the roaming and other services we need from other carriers to remain
competitive.
Many of our competitors have regional or national networks which enable them to offer
automatic roaming and long distance telephone services to their subscribers at a lower cost than we
can offer and allow them to offer unlimited fixed-rate roaming plans on their existing networks
over a larger area than we can offer. We do not have a national network, and we must pay fees to
other carriers who provide roaming services and who carry long distance calls made by our
subscribers. We currently have roaming agreements with several other carriers which allow our
customers to roam on those carriers network. The roaming agreements, however, do not cover all
geographic areas where our customers may seek service when they travel, generally cover voice but
not data services, and at least one such agreement may be terminated on relatively short notice and
may not be renewed in the future. In addition, we believe the rates we are charged by certain
carriers in some instances are higher than the rates they charge to other roaming partners.
Further, many of the wireless carriers against whom we compete have service area footprints,
including roaming area footprints, substantially larger than our footprint and some have
substantially more spectrum. Certain of our competitors also are able to offer their customers
roaming services at lower rates than we can offer. The FCC recently clarified that CMRS providers
must offer automatic roaming services on just, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. Based on
this ruling, we may be obligated to allow customers of other technically compatible carriers to
roam automatically on our systems, which may enhance their ability to compete with us. We also have
no assurance that the rates we will be charged for automatic roaming will be reasonable as the FCC
did not establish a default rate. The FCC also found that a CMRS provider is not required to offer
automatic roaming services for any geographic area in which a requesting carrier holds licenses to
or leases spectrum even if it has not yet built its system, for roaming services that are
classified as information services (such as high speed wireless Internet access services), or for
roaming services that are not classified as CMRS (such as non-interconnected services). If we are
unable to enter into or maintain roaming agreements for roaming services that our customers want at
reasonable rates, including in areas where we have licenses or lease spectrum but have not
constructed facilities, we may be unable to compete effectively and may lose customers and
revenues. We may also be unable to continue to receive roaming services in areas in which we hold
licenses or lease spectrum after the expiration or termination of our existing roaming agreements.
Furthermore, as the wireless industry consolidates, our ability to replicate our roaming service
offerings at rates which will make us, or allow us to be, competitive is uncertain at this time and
may become more difficult. For example, if the announced merger of Verizon Wireless with Alltel
Corporation is approved and consummated, we will lose one existing roaming partner and the number
of remaining carriers using our technology from whom we can obtain roaming services in certain
metropolitan and rural areas will decrease to two which may decrease our ability to receive roaming
services at reasonable rates if at all.
Our billing vendor has publicly announced that it plans to leave the telecommunications services
business, including the billing services business.
Verisign, the vendor for our existing billing system, has publicly announced that it plans to
leave the telecommunications services business, including the billing services business. We have a
contract with Verisign that will allow us to transition our billing services to a third party
through mid-year 2009; however, Verisign has recently notified us that it does not plan to renew
our existing agreement for the provision of billing services in connection with our BREW, roaming
services and incidental long distance services which will terminate in early 2009. We are in the
process of identifying and negotiating a new billing service agreement with a third party. If
Verisign fails to continue to provide the services it has previously provided prior to our
transition to a third party system, if Verisign fails to continue to upgrade its software and
systems as we grow and change our business, or if we are unable to find a new vendor to support our
billing system on a cost effective basis or at all or we are unable to transition our billing
services to a new vendor before the end of the transition period, we may not be able to bill our
customers, provide
56
customer care, grow our business, report financial results, or manage our business and we may
have increased churn, all of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business and
financial results.
A patent infringement suit has been filed against us by Leap which could have a material adverse
effect on our business or results of operations.
On June 14, 2006, Leap and Cricket Communications, Inc., or collectively Leap, filed suit
against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
Division, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless
Communication Services and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by
Leap. On July 1, 2008, the Court entered an order accepting for filing a second amended complaint
which added MetroPCS wholly owned subsidiaries as additional defendants and dropped Leap Wireless
International, Inc. as a plaintiff. The suit seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages,
including treble damages and attorneys fees, for our alleged willful infringement of the 497
Patent. The court has scheduled the claim construction hearing for late October 2008 and the trial
setting for April 2009.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not
being infringed upon by Royal Street Communications. The Court entered an Order transferring the
action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division,
Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW, where it remains pending. In February 2008, Leap answered the
complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street Communications, claiming that Royal Street
Communications willfully infringes the 497 Patent and seeking both injunctive relief and monetary
damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for Royal Street Communications alleged
willful infringement by its wireless communication systems and associated services of the 497
Patent. The Court has entered an order consolidating this action with the action brought by Leap
against us solely for the purposes of discovery.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief in either action, we and Royal
Street Communications could be enjoined from operating our respective businesses in the manner in
which we and Royal Street Communications currently operate, could require us and Royal Street
Communications to expend additional capital to change certain technologies and operating practices,
or could prevent both us and Royal Street Communications from offering some or all of the services
we each provide using some or all of the existing systems. In addition, if Leap were successful in
its claim for monetary damages, we and Royal Street Communications could be forced to pay Leap
substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for past infringement and/or
ongoing royalties on a portion of both our revenues, which could materially adversely impact our
financial performance and Royal Street Communications financial performance.
If Freedom Wireless refiles its patent suit against us and is successful it could have a material
adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
On January 7, 2008, Freedom Wireless, Inc., or Freedom Wireless, filed suit against us in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco, for
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,722,067 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System,
U.S. Patent No. 6,157,823 entitled Security Cellular Telecommunications System, and U.S. Patent
No. 6,236,851 entitled Prepaid Security Cellular Telecommunications System held by Freedom
Wireless. The complaint sought both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble
damages, for our alleged infringement of these patents. On May 20, 2008, Freedom Wireless dismissed
its action against us without prejudice to its right to bring an action against us in the future.
If Freedom Wireless decides to pursue its action against us in the future and is successful, it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. Moreover, any such action may consume valuable management time, may be very costly to
defend and may distract management attention away from our business.
57
We plan to utilize DAS systems to construct critical portions of our new metropolitan areas,
including the Auction 66 Markets, and any delay in construction of or inability of our existing
DAS providers to construct such systems may delay a launch of new metropolitan areas, including
the Auction 66 Markets.
We currently plan to use DAS systems in lieu of traditional cell sites to provide service to
certain critical portions of new metropolitan areas we plan to build, including the Auction 66
Markets. These DAS systems may be leased and/or licensed from third party suppliers. The use of DAS
systems to provide service in difficult to construct areas of a metropolitan area, such as downtown
areas, is not new to wireless carriers; however, the scope of our proposed use of such DAS systems
is new to us. In addition, in order to construct DAS systems, the DAS provider will be required to
obtain necessary authority from the relevant state and local regulatory authorities and to secure
certain agreements, such as right of way agreements, in order to construct or operate the DAS
systems. In addition, the DAS system provider may be required to construct a transport network as
part of their construction of the DAS systems. Some of the DAS system providers we are using have
not previously constructed or been authorized to construct DAS systems in certain of our new
metropolitan areas, including our Auction 66 Markets, so there may be unforeseen obstacles and
delays in constructing the DAS systems in those metropolitan areas. In addition, the authorization
of the DAS provider to construct DAS systems may be subject to challenge. For example, in June
2008, a competing DAS provider filed an action challenging the franchise authorization and right of
our DAS provider to construct DAS systems on certain utility and city owned facilities in New York
City. The competing DAS provider has sued both the City of New York and our DAS provider seeking
to vacate and annul the authorization granted to our DAS provider, annul any selection of utility
or city facilities by our DAS provider, find that the City had breached its franchise agreement
with the competing DAS provider, and assess monetary damages and equitable relief, including
specific performance, against the City of New York.
Since the scope of the DAS systems being considered is substantial and we are considering
using these DAS systems to provide service in critical areas, any delay in the construction of
these DAS systems or inability to use DAS systems provided by our existing DAS providers could
delay our launch of our new metropolitan areas and could have a material adverse effect on our
future operations and financial results. In addition, the use of DAS systems will result in an
acceleration of capital expenditures compared to our traditional metropolitan builds without DAS
systems. DAS systems also pose particular compliance challenges with regard to the FCCs recently
adopted eight hour back up power requirement which could have a material adverse affect on our
ability to comply with applicable laws, could require us to spend significant amounts of additional
capital, and could have a material adverse affect on our financial and operating results.
The investment of our substantial cash balances are subject to risks which may cause losses.
We can and have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or any state, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. For
example, in 2007 we made an original investment of $133.9 million in principal in certain auction
rate securities, which had AAA credit ratings at the time of purchase, substantially all of which
are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being
mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Substantially all of these auction rate
securities held by us have been downgraded or placed on credit watch. As a result of the lack of
liquidity in the global credit and capital markets, these auction rate securities failed to attract
a buyer at scheduled auctions. As a result, these auction rate securities are illiquid and we have
recognized a significant loss on these investments and we may recognize additional losses in the
future up to the full amount of the investments if uncertainties in these markets continue, these
markets deteriorate further, or the Company experiences any ratings downgrades on investments in
its portfolio (including the auction rate securities). Such risks, including the continued failure
of future auctions for the auction rate securities, may result in a loss of liquidity, substantial
impairment to our investments, realization of substantial future losses, or a complete loss of the
investment in the long-term which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, liquidity and financial condition.
58
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel,
and the loss of one or more members of our management, including our chief executive officer,
could have a negative impact on our business.
Our business is managed by a small number of key executive officers, including our chief
executive officer, Roger Linquist. The loss of one or more of these persons could disrupt our
ability to react quickly to business developments and changes in market conditions, which could
harm our financial results. None of our managing key executives has an employment contract, so any
such executive officers may leave at any time subject to forfeiture of any unpaid performance
awards and any unvested options. We believe that our future success will also depend in large part
on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive, technical and management
personnel. We believe competition for highly qualified management, technical and sales personnel is
intense, and there can be no assurance that we will retain our key management, technical and sales
employees, that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining other highly
qualified management, technical and sales personnel in the future sufficient to support our
continued growth, or that we will be successful in replacing any of our key management, technical
and sales personnel that may retire or cease to be employed by us. We have occasionally experienced
difficulty in recruiting qualified personnel and there can be no assurance that we will not
experience such difficulties in the future. The departure or retirement of, or our inability to
attract or retain, highly qualified executive, technical and management personnel, including the
chief executive officer, could materially and adversely affect our business operations, financial
performance, and stock price.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
The requirements of the FCC Order Implementing the Independent Panel on Hurricane Katrina may have
a material financial or operational impact on our financial results and operations.
The FCC recently adopted a requirement that wireless carriers maintain emergency back-up power
for a minimum of twenty-four hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power
and located inside mobile switching offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered
from local commercial power and at other locations, including cell sites and DAS nodes. The back-up
power requirement has not yet taken effect, and the date on which it will take effect is uncertain.
An industry group and several wireless carriers filed an appeal of this requirement to the District
of Columbia Court of Appeals and the effectiveness of the rules has been stayed. In July 2008, the
Court issued a decision ruling that the appeal was not ripe for a decision because the information
collection requirements, which the Court found integral to the rules, had not yet been submitted to
or approved by the Office of Management and Budget, or OMB. The Court, however, retained the case
but held the appeal in abeyance pending a decision by the OMB approving or disapproving the
information collection requirements associated with the rules. If and when the rule takes effect,
we will not be required to comply with these minimum backup power requirements at sites where we
can demonstrate that such compliance is precluded by certain exceptions. To the extent we are
required to comply with these requirements, we may find it necessary to file a waiver with the FCC
seeking relief from these requirements or additional time to comply. We can give no assurance that
the FCC will grant any such relief. If we are required to comply with these requirements we may
have to purchase additional equipment, spend additional capital, seek and receive additional state
and local permits, authorizations and approvals, and incur additional operating expenses and such
costs could be material. In addition, we may be unable to comply with these requirements and we
could be forced to cease operations from some locations or be subject to fines and forfeitures and
other adverse licensing actions from the FCC. Further, the requirement to install these back up
power facilities could also adversely affect our operations by distracting management and
engineering resources from the maintenance and growth of our existing networks or new metropolitan
areas, such as the Auction 66 Markets or could limit our ability to use certain technologies, such
as DAS systems, which could have a material adverse impact on our operations and delay a launch of
service in such areas. Finally, a material failure to comply with these requirements may limit our
ability to draw certain amounts under our existing senior secured credit facility or could result
in a default under our 91/4% senior notes due 2014.
59
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of April 2,
2008, by and between Royal Street Communications, LLC, Royal Street Communications California, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 262, LLC, Royal Street Communications Florida, LLC, Royal Street BTA 159, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 212, LLC, Royal Street BTA 239, LLC, Royal Street BTA 289, LLC and Royal Street
BTA 336, LLC and MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of June 12,
2008, by and between Royal Street Communications, LLC, Royal Street Communications California, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 262, LLC, Royal Street Communications Florida, LLC, Royal Street BTA 159, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 212, LLC, Royal Street BTA 239, LLC, Royal Street BTA 289, LLC and Royal Street
BTA 336, LLC and MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. |
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
61
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Third Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of April 2,
2008, by and between Royal Street Communications, LLC, Royal Street Communications California, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 262, LLC, Royal Street Communications Florida, LLC, Royal Street BTA 159, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 212, LLC, Royal Street BTA 239, LLC, Royal Street BTA 289, LLC and Royal Street
BTA 336, LLC and MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of June 12,
2008, by and between Royal Street Communications, LLC, Royal Street Communications California, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 262, LLC, Royal Street Communications Florida, LLC, Royal Street BTA 159, LLC,
Royal Street BTA 212, LLC, Royal Street BTA 239, LLC, Royal Street BTA 289, LLC and Royal Street
BTA 336, LLC and MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. |
62