e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
1-33409
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-0836269 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2250 Lakeside Boulevard |
|
|
Richardson, Texas
|
|
75082-4304 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 570-5800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On October 31, 2008, there were 350,173,117 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.0001
par value, outstanding.
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
* |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
* |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
* |
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
EX-10.1 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
|
|
|
* |
|
No reportable information under this item. |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,020,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
82,495 |
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for
uncollectible accounts of $3,637 and $2,908
at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
39,306 |
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
67,798 |
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
38,337 |
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
23,675 |
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,276,925 |
|
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,514,435 |
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
16,945 |
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
2,391,343 |
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
66,269 |
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,277,975 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
573,736 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
16,492 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
136,536 |
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
731,185 |
|
|
|
580,490 |
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
|
3,001,265 |
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
384,410 |
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
50,047 |
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
80,169 |
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,253,045 |
|
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares of preferred stock issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 350,097,854
and 348,108,027 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,564,883 |
|
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
473,275 |
|
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(13,263 |
) |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,024,930 |
|
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,277,975 |
|
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
610,691 |
|
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,771,222 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
76,030 |
|
|
|
67,607 |
|
|
|
256,660 |
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
686,721 |
|
|
|
556,738 |
|
|
|
2,027,882 |
|
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense of $58,484, $40,247, $160,202 and $112,073, shown
separately below) |
|
|
219,423 |
|
|
|
163,671 |
|
|
|
614,036 |
|
|
|
471,233 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
160,538 |
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
|
|
520,783 |
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense of $9,147, $5,246,
$25,617 and $13,923, shown separately below) |
|
|
116,654 |
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
|
|
334,448 |
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
67,631 |
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
|
|
185,819 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
566,068 |
|
|
|
423,600 |
|
|
|
1,659,557 |
|
|
|
1,276,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
120,653 |
|
|
|
133,138 |
|
|
|
368,325 |
|
|
|
367,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
42,950 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
136,032 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
41,059 |
|
|
|
46,518 |
|
|
|
136,588 |
|
|
|
123,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
79,594 |
|
|
|
86,620 |
|
|
|
231,737 |
|
|
|
244,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(34,714 |
) |
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
(96,873 |
) |
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
44,880 |
|
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
|
134,864 |
|
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,499 |
) |
Accrued dividends on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
Accretion on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Accretion on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
6,363 |
|
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedging derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
(3,202 |
) |
|
|
(9,286 |
) |
|
|
(7,863 |
) |
|
|
(4,157 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in
net income, net of tax |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
(5,016 |
) |
|
|
8,271 |
|
|
|
(7,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
45,248 |
|
|
$ |
42,767 |
|
|
$ |
136,070 |
|
|
$ |
142,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
349,983,692 |
|
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
349,069,936 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
355,883,935 |
|
|
|
356,638,145 |
|
|
|
355,573,339 |
|
|
|
276,482,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
185,819 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
14,268 |
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
4,876 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
30,254 |
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,523 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
93,484 |
|
|
|
95,257 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,644 |
|
|
|
(3,348 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(7,511 |
) |
|
|
(6,252 |
) |
Prepaid charges |
|
|
(17,854 |
) |
|
|
(10,268 |
) |
Deferred charges |
|
|
(3,702 |
) |
|
|
(3,941 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(16,057 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
21,381 |
|
|
|
49,584 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
16,069 |
|
|
|
17,785 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
527,907 |
|
|
|
440,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(660,771 |
) |
|
|
(525,701 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
(9,523 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,358,427 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
3,501,457 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Purchases of FCC licenses |
|
|
(314,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
(25,163 |
) |
|
|
(669 |
) |
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(991,234 |
) |
|
|
(392,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
23,021 |
|
Proceeds from 91/4% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
Proceeds from initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
13,511 |
|
|
|
1,254,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(449,816 |
) |
|
|
1,302,762 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
1,020,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
balances and results of operations of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (MetroPCS) and its
consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). MetroPCS indirectly owns, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, 85% of the limited liability company member interest in Royal Street
Communications, LLC (Royal Street Communications). The consolidated financial statements include
the balances and results of operations of MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the
balances and results of operations of Royal Street Communications and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively Royal Street). The Company consolidates its interest in Royal Street in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, because Royal Street is a variable interest entity and the Company
will absorb all of Royal Streets expected losses. All intercompany accounts and transactions
between MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and Royal Street have been eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements. The redeemable minority interest in Royal Street is included in
long-term liabilities. The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and
cash flows for the periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related footnotes are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) and E-911 fees are assessed by various governmental
authorities in connection with the services that the Company provides to its customers. The
Company reports these fees on a gross basis in service revenues and cost of service on the
accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. For the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded approximately $31.1 million and $24.7 million,
respectively, of FUSF and E-911 fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company recorded approximately $87.7 million and $69.9 million, respectively, of FUSF and E-911
fees. Sales, use and excise taxes are reported on a net basis in selling, general and
administrative expenses on the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income.
On March 14, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a 3 for 1 stock split of the
Companys common stock effected by means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each
share of common stock issued and outstanding on that date. All share, per share and conversion
amounts relating to common stock and stock options included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS consummated its initial public offering (the Offering) of
57,500,000 shares of common stock priced at $23.00 per share (less underwriting discounts and
commissions). MetroPCS sold 37,500,000 shares of common stock and certain of MetroPCS existing
stockholders sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock in the Offering, which included 7,500,000
shares sold by MetroPCS existing stockholders pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their
over-allotment option. Concurrent with the Offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including accrued but unpaid dividends, were converted into 150,962,644 shares of common stock.
The shares began trading on April 19, 2007 on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS.
4
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2. Acquisitions:
On December 21, 2007, the Company executed an agreement with PTA Communications, Inc. (PTA)
to purchase 10 MHz of personal communications services (PCS) spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of Jacksonville, Florida. The Company also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc.
(dba Cleartalk PCS) and PTA-FLA, Inc. for the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing
PCS wireless telecommunications services in the Jacksonville market. On January 17, 2008, the
Company closed on the acquisition of certain assets used in providing PCS wireless services. The
Company paid a total of $18.6 million in cash for these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On
May 13, 2008, the Company closed on the purchase of the 10 MHz of spectrum from PTA for the basic
trading area of Jacksonville, Florida for consideration of $6.5 million in cash.
3. Share-Based Payments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company has recognized stock-based compensation
expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, which includes stock options
granted to employees. The Company records stock-based compensation expense in cost of service and
selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under
SFAS No. 123(R) was $10.8 million and $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Cost of service for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
includes $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. For the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, selling, general and administrative expenses include $9.9
million and $6.5 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation
expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) was $30.3 million and $19.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cost of service for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $2.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, selling, general and
administrative expenses include $28.2 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of stock-based
compensation.
On March 7, 2008, the Company granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 5,393,065
shares of the Companys common stock to certain employees and non-employee directors. The exercise
price for the stock option grants is $16.20, which was equal to the Companys common stock closing
price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The stock options granted generally vest
on a four-year vesting schedule with 25% vesting on the first anniversary date of the award and the
remainder pro-rata on a monthly basis thereafter. The grant date fair value of these stock options
was approximately $36.9 million.
4. Investments:
The Company has historically invested its substantial cash balances in, among other things,
securities issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated commercial
paper and auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand
deposits. These investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. At
September 30, 2008, the Company had invested substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in
money market funds consisting of treasury securities.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company made an original investment of
$133.9 million in principal in certain auction rate securities, substantially all of which are
secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being
mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Consistent with the Companys investment
policy guidelines, the auction rate securities investments held by the Company all had AAA/Aaa
credit ratings at the time of purchase. With the continuing liquidity issues experienced in the
global credit and capital markets, the auction rate securities held by the Company at September 30,
2008 continued to experience failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the
auctions exceeded the amount of purchase orders. In addition, substantially all of the auction
rate securities held by the Company have been downgraded or placed on credit watch by at least one
credit rating agency.
The estimated market value of the Companys auction rate security holdings at September 30,
2008 was approximately $16.8 million, which reflects a $117.1 million adjustment to the original
principal value of $133.9
5
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was approximately $36.1 million,
which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the aggregate principal value at that date. Although
the auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated terms, based on
statements received from the Companys broker and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment
factors, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.0 million and $20.0 million during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, reflecting an additional portion of
the auction rate security holdings that the Company has concluded have an other-than-temporary
decline in value. The offsetting increase in fair value of approximately $0.7 million is reported
in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets.
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, the Companys auction rate securities
were presented as current assets under short-term investments on the Companys balance sheet.
Given the failed auctions, the Companys auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a
successful auction for them or the Company sells them. Accordingly, the entire amount of such
remaining auction rate securities has been reclassified from current to non-current assets and is
presented in long-term investments on the accompanying balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. The Company may incur additional impairments to its auction rate securities
which may be up to the full remaining value of such auction rate securities.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
On November 21, 2006, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of MetroPCS
(Wireless), entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of Wireless secured credit facility,
pursuant to which Wireless may borrow up to $1.7 billion, as amended, (the Senior Secured Credit
Facility). The agreement covers a notional amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this
portion of Wireless variable rate debt to fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. This
financial instrument is reported in other long-term liabilities at a fair market value of
approximately $22.5 million as of September 30, 2008. The decrease in fair value of $1.0 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
On April 30, 2008, Wireless entered into an additional two-year interest rate protection
agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure. The agreement was effective on June
30, 2008 and covers a notional amount of $500.0 million and effectively converts this portion of
Wireless variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of 5.46%. The monthly interest
settlement periods began on June 30, 2008. This agreement expires on June 30, 2010. This
financial instrument is reported in long-term investments at a fair market value of approximately
$0.2 million as of September 30, 2008. The decrease in fair value of $1.4 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The interest rate protection agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges. If a
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge and the hedging relationship qualifies for hedge
accounting under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended (SFAS No. 133), the effective portion of the change in fair value of the
derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified to
interest expense in the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of a derivative qualifying for hedge accounting is recognized
in earnings in the period of the change. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the change
in fair value did not result in ineffectiveness.
At
the inception of the cash flow hedges and quarterly thereafter, the Company performs an
assessment to determine whether changes in the fair values or cash flows of the derivatives are
deemed highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged
transaction. If at any time subsequent to the inception of the cash
flow hedges, the assessment
indicates that the derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, the Company will
discontinue hedge accounting and recognize all subsequent derivative gains and losses in results of
operations.
6
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
$ |
647,231 |
|
|
$ |
393,282 |
|
Network infrastructure |
|
|
2,415,023 |
|
|
|
1,901,119 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
62,684 |
|
|
|
44,059 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
45,072 |
|
|
|
33,410 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
10,155 |
|
|
|
7,833 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180,437 |
|
|
|
2,379,910 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(666,002 |
) |
|
|
(488,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
2,514,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,891,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. FCC Licenses and Microwave Relocation Costs:
The Company operates broadband PCS networks under licenses granted by the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) for a particular geographic area on spectrum allocated by the FCC
for broadband PCS services. In addition, in November 2006, the Company acquired a number of
advanced wireless services (AWS) licenses which can be used to provide services comparable to the
PCS services provided by the Company, and other advanced wireless services. In June 2008, the
Company acquired a 700 MHz license that also can be used to provide similar services. The PCS
licenses previously included, and the AWS licenses currently include, the obligation to relocate
existing fixed microwave users of the Companys licensed spectrum if the use of the Companys
spectrum would interfere with their systems and/or reimburse other carriers (according to FCC
rules) that relocated prior users if the relocation benefits the Companys system. Accordingly,
the Company incurred costs related to microwave relocation in constructing its PCS and AWS
networks. The microwave relocation costs are recorded at cost. Although PCS, AWS, and 700 MHz
licenses are issued with a stated term, 10 years in the case of the PCS licenses, 15 years in the
case of the AWS licenses, and approximately 10.5 years for 700 MHz licenses, the renewal of PCS,
AWS, and 700 MHz licenses is generally a routine matter without substantial cost, thus the Company
has determined that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors
currently exist that limit the useful life of its PCS, AWS and 700 MHz licenses. The carrying
value of FCC licenses and microwave relocation costs was approximately $2.4 billion as of September
30, 2008.
The Companys primary indefinite-lived intangible assets are its FCC licenses. Based on the
requirements of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS No. 142) the Company
tests investments in its FCC licenses for impairment annually or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of its FCC licenses might be impaired.
The Company performs its annual FCC license impairment test as of each September 30th. The
impairment test consists of a comparison of the estimated fair value with the carrying value. The
Company estimates the fair value of its FCC licenses using a discounted cash flow model. Cash flow
projections and assumptions, although subject to a degree of uncertainty, are based on a
combination of the Companys historical performance and trends, its business plans and managements
estimate of future performance, giving consideration to existing and anticipated competitive
economic conditions. Other assumptions include the Companys weighted average cost of capital and
long-term rate of growth for its business. The Company believes that its estimates are consistent
with assumptions that marketplace participants would use to estimate fair value. The Company
corroborates its determination of fair value of the FCC licenses, using the discounted cash flow
approach described above, with other market-based valuation metrics. Furthermore, the Company
segregates its FCC licenses by regional clusters for the purpose of performing the impairment test
because each geographical region is unique. An impairment loss would be recorded as a reduction in
the carrying value of the related indefinite-lived intangible asset and charged to results of
operations.
For the license impairment test performed as of September 30, 2008, the fair value of the FCC
licenses was in excess of its carrying value and no impairment has been recognized through
September 30, 2008.
7
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Auction 73
The Company participated as a bidder in FCC Auction No. 73, and on June 26, 2008, the Company
was granted one 700 MHz license for a total aggregate purchase price of approximately
$313.3 million. This 700 MHz license supplements the 10 MHz of AWS spectrum previously granted to
the Company in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area
as a result of FCC Auction No. 66.
Other Spectrum Acquisitions
On September 26, 2008, the Company entered into a spectrum exchange agreement covering
licenses in certain markets with Leap Wireless International, Inc. (Leap Wireless) with Leap
Wireless acquiring an additional 10 MHz of spectrum in San Diego and Fresno, California; Seattle,
Washington and certain other Washington and Oregon markets, and the Company acquiring an additional
10 MHz of spectrum in Shreveport-Bossier City, Louisiana; Lakeland-Winter Haven, Florida; and
Dallas-Ft. Worth, Texas and certain other North Texas markets. Completion of the spectrum exchange
is subject to customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company entered into various agreements
for the acquisition and exchange of spectrum in the aggregate amount of approximately $15.3
million. Consummation of these acquisitions is conditioned upon customary closing conditions,
including approval by the FCC.
8. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
227,906 |
|
|
$ |
131,177 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
41,208 |
|
|
|
25,399 |
|
Accrued accounts payable |
|
|
143,336 |
|
|
|
155,733 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
15,223 |
|
|
|
16,285 |
|
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
23,234 |
|
|
|
29,380 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
66,217 |
|
|
|
33,892 |
|
Taxes, other than income |
|
|
50,241 |
|
|
|
41,044 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
573,736 |
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
91/4% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
1,568,000 |
|
|
|
1,580,000 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
29,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
2,997,449 |
|
|
|
2,980,000 |
|
Add: unamortized premium on debt |
|
|
20,308 |
|
|
|
22,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
3,017,757 |
|
|
|
3,002,177 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(16,492 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,001,265 |
|
|
$ |
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91/4% Senior Notes
On November 3, 2006, Wireless completed the sale of $1.0 billion of principal amount of
91/4% Senior Notes due 2014, (the Initial Notes). On June 6, 2007, Wireless completed the sale of
an additional $400.0 million of 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014 (the Additional Notes and
together with the Initial Notes, the 91/4% Senior Notes) under the existing indenture at a price
equal to 105.875% of the principal amount of such Additional Notes.
8
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The 91/4% Senior Notes are unsecured obligations and are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS, Inc.,
and all of Wireless direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, but are not guaranteed by Royal
Street. Interest is payable on the 91/4% Senior Notes on May 1 and November 1 of each year.
Wireless may, at its option, redeem some or all of the 91/4% Senior Notes at any time on or after
November 1, 2010 for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 91/4% Senior
Notes. In addition, Wireless may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
91/4% Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain sales of equity securities.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 3, 2006, Wireless entered into the Senior Secured Credit Facility, which consists
of a $1.6 billion term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. On November 3,
2006, Wireless borrowed $1.6 billion under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The term loan
facility is repayable in quarterly installments in annual aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the
initial aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion.
The facilities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS,
Inc. and each of Wireless direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The facilities are not guaranteed by Royal Street, but Wireless pledged the
promissory note that Royal Street has given it in connection with amounts borrowed by Royal Street
from Wireless and the limited liability company member interest held in Royal Street
Communications. The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
cross defaults. The obligations are also secured by the capital stock of Wireless as well as
substantially all of Wireless present and future assets and the capital stock and substantially
all of the assets of each of its direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned subsidiaries
(except as prohibited by law and certain permitted exceptions), but excludes Royal Street.
The interest rate on the outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is
variable. The rate as of September 30, 2008 was 6.575%. On November 21, 2006, Wireless entered
into a three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk
exposure and fulfill a requirement of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The agreement covers a
notional amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate
debt to fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. On February 20, 2007, Wireless entered into
an amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the amendment, the margin on the base
rate used to determine the Senior Secured Credit Facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from
2.50%. On April 30, 2008, Wireless entered into an additional two-year interest rate protection
agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure.
This agreement was effective on June
30, 2008, covers a notional amount of $500.0 million and effectively converts this portion of
Wireless variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of 5.46%.
Capital Lease Obligations
The Company has entered into various non-cancelable distributed antenna systems (DAS)
capital lease agreements, with varying expiration terms through 2023, covering dedicated optical
fiber. Assets and future obligations related to capital leases are included in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet in property and equipment and long-term debt, respectively.
Depreciation of assets held under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization
expense. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had $29.5 million of capital lease obligations,
with $0.5 million and $29.0 million recorded in current maturities of long-term debt and long-term
debt, respectively.
10. Fair Value Measurements:
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (SFAS No. 157) for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 became effective
for financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, thereby
eliminating inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements, and
increases disclosures surrounding fair value calculations.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to
valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as
follows:
9
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets that the Company has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive
markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable
(e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities,
etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not
observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use. |
SFAS No. 157 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of
the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value calculation. The Companys financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis include long-term investments securities and derivative
financial instruments.
Included in the Companys long-term investments securities are certain auction rate securities
some of which are secured by collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying
collateral being mortgage securities or related to mortgage securities. Due to the lack of
availability of observable market quotes on the Companys investment portfolio of auction rate
securities, the fair value was estimated based on the Companys broker-dealer valuation models and
an internal analysis by management of other-than-temporary impairment factors. The broker-dealer
models considered credit default risks, the liquidity of the underlying security and overall
capital market liquidity. Management also looked to other marketplace transactions, and
information received from other third party brokers in order to assess whether the fair value based
on the broker-dealer valuation models was reasonable. The valuation of the Companys investment
portfolio is subject to uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Factors that may impact the
Companys valuation include changes to credit ratings of the securities as well as the underlying
assets supporting those securities, rates of default of the underlying assets, underlying
collateral values, discount rates, counterparty risk and ongoing strength and quality of market
credit and liquidity. Significant inputs to the investments valuation are unobservable in the
active markets and are classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Included in the Companys derivative financial instruments are interest rate swaps.
Derivative financial instruments are valued in the market using discounted cash flow techniques.
These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as interest rates. These market inputs
are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instruments term, notional
amount, discount rate and credit risk. Significant inputs to the derivative valuation for interest
rate swaps are observable in the active markets and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy.
The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2008, as required by SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
|
$ |
16,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,475 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,475 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Companys Level 3 assets, as
required by SFAS No. 157 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Fair Value Measurements of Assets Using Level 3 Inputs |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
19,730 |
|
|
$ |
36,050 |
|
Total losses (gains) (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
Losses included in earnings
that are attributable to the
change in unrealized losses
relating to those assets still
held at the reporting date as
reported in impairment loss on
investment securities in the
condensed consolidated
statements of income and
comprehensive income |
|
$ |
2,956 |
|
|
$ |
20,037 |
|
11. Income Taxes:
The Company records income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 uses an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes,
wherein deferred taxes are provided for book and tax basis differences for assets and liabilities.
As part of the Companys financial process, it must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax
assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by
recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are
estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are
evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred
tax assets, the taxable income in prior carryback years that can be used to absorb net operating
losses and credit carrybacks and taxable income in future years. The Companys judgment regarding
future taxable income may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. tax laws and
other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax
assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made.
FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48), clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance
with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement
of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues. Since
December 31, 2007, there have been no changes in the amount of the Companys unrecognized tax
benefits. The Company did accrue interest expense on the unrecognized tax benefit during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008. A state examination is currently ongoing and the Company
believes it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in that state could
significantly decrease within the next 12 month period. The gross unrecognized tax benefits for
this position could decrease due to settlement with this state in an amount up to $2.7 million. In
another state jurisdiction, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits in that state could significantly decrease within the next 12 months due
to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The gross unrecognized tax benefits for this tax
position could decrease due to the expiring statute in an amount up to $8.3 million. The Company
does not anticipate that a proposed adjustment in either of the state jurisdictions would result in
a material change to the Companys financial position.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is currently examining the 2005 tax year of Royal Street
Communications. Management does not believe the examination will have a significant effect on the
Companys tax position.
11
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In addition, there is a state income and franchise tax examination currently in progress for
one of the Companys subsidiaries for various tax years. Management does not believe this
examination will have a significant effect on the Companys tax position.
12. Stockholders Equity:
Common Stock Issued to Directors
Non-employee members of MetroPCS Board of Directors receive compensation for serving on the
Board of Directors, as provided in MetroPCS Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan (the
Remuneration Plan). In 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors amended and
restated the Remuneration Plan (the 2008 Remuneration Plan) to be more competitive with the
market and to be more reflective of the Companys status as a public company. The Remuneration
Plan provided, among other things, that each non-employee directors annual retainer and meeting
fees may be paid, at the election of each non-employee director, in cash, common stock, or a
combination of cash and common stock. The 2008 Remuneration Plan provides that each non-employee
directors annual retainer and meeting fees will be paid in cash and each director will receive
options to purchase common stock. In accordance with the 2008 Remuneration Plan, no shares of
common stock were issued to non-employee members of the Board of Directors during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, non-employee members of
the Board of Directors were issued 31,230 shares of common stock as partial payment of their annual
retainer.
13. Net Income Per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic EPSTwo Class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Accrued dividends and accretion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,647 |
) |
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
139,871 |
|
Amount allocable to common shareholders |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
118,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
349,983,692 |
|
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
349,069,936 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
118,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
349,983,692 |
|
|
|
346,844,393 |
|
|
|
349,069,936 |
|
|
|
267,545,403 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
5,900,242 |
|
|
|
9,793,752 |
|
|
|
6,503,403 |
|
|
|
8,937,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
355,883,934 |
|
|
|
356,638,145 |
|
|
|
355,573,339 |
|
|
|
276,482,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share during 2007 was computed in accordance with EITF 03-6
"Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, (EITF 03-06).
Under EITF 03-6, the preferred stock is considered a participating security for purposes of
computing earnings or loss per common share and, therefore, the preferred stock is included in the
computation of basic and diluted net income per common share using the two-class method, except
during periods of net losses. Preferred stock was included in the computation of income per common
share through April 24, 2007, the date of conversion to common stock as a result of the Offering.
When determining basic earnings per common share under EITF 03-6, undistributed earnings for a
period are allocated to a participating security based on the contractual participation rights of
the security to share in those earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been
distributed.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, 13.0 million and 6.3 million,
respectively, of stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common
share since the effect was anti-
12
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, 11.5 million and 3.6
million, respectively, of stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income
per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 59.1 million of convertible shares of Series D
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 2.5 million of convertible shares of Series E
Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share since the
effect was anti-dilutive.
14. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company has entered into a pricing agreement with a handset manufacturer for the purchase
of wireless handsets at specified prices. The terms of this agreement expire on December 31, 2008.
Total commitments outstanding under this pricing agreement are approximately $15.0 million as of
September 30, 2008.
AWS Licenses Acquired in Auction 66
Spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized by a variety of categories of commercial and
governmental users. To foster the orderly clearing of the spectrum, the FCC adopted a transition
and cost sharing plan pursuant to which incumbent non-governmental users could be reimbursed for
relocating out of the band, and the costs of relocation would be shared by AWS licensees benefiting
from the relocation. The FCC has established a plan where the AWS licensee and the incumbent
non-governmental user are to negotiate voluntarily for three years and then, if no agreement has
been reached, the incumbent licensee is subject to mandatory relocation where the AWS licensee can
force the incumbent non-governmental licensee to relocate at the AWS licensees expense. The
spectrum allocated for AWS currently is utilized also by incumbent governmental users. The FCC
rules provide that a portion of the money raised in Auction 66 will be used to reimburse the
relocation costs of incumbent governmental users from the AWS band. However, not all incumbent
governmental users are obligated to relocate and some such users may delay relocation for some
time. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred approximately
$1.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in microwave relocation costs relating to its AWS
licenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred
approximately $2.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in microwave relocation costs relating
to its AWS licenses.
FCC Katrina Order
In October 2007, the FCC released an Order on Reconsideration (Reconsideration Order)
adopting rules which require the Company to maintain emergency backup power for a minimum of
twenty-four hours for assets that are normally powered from local commercial power and located
inside mobile switching offices, and eight hours for assets that are normally powered from local
commercial power at other locations, including cell sites and DAS nodes. The rules have not taken
effect and, due to legal challenges as described below, the date on which they will become
effective, if at all, is unknown. If and when the rules take effect, the Company will not be
required to comply immediately with these minimum backup power requirements at locations where the
Company can demonstrate that such compliance is precluded by: (i) federal, state, tribal or local
law; (ii) risk to safety of life or health; or (iii) private legal obligation or agreement. In
addition, the rules require the Company to file a report with the FCC providing certain information
with respect to compliance with the backup power requirements. In cases where the Company
identifies assets that were designed with less than the required emergency backup power capacity
and compliance is not precluded, the Company must comply with the backup power requirement or,
within 12 months from the effective date of the rule, file with the FCC a certified emergency
backup power compliance plan. That plan must certify and describe how the Company will provide
emergency backup power to 100 percent of the area covered by any non-compliant asset in the event
of a commercial power failure. The backup power rules originally were scheduled to take effect
six months after the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approves the above-described
collection of information. OMB has solicited comment on the information collection requirement and
several interested parties, including the Company, have opposed the collection requirement. If the
OMB does not act by early November, the FCC could declare the rules effective, and, even if the OMB
rejects the collection of information, the FCC could reject the OMB determination. In addition,
multiple parties have filed an appeal of the Reconsideration Order with the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals. The appeal is being held in
13
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
abeyance pending action by OMB and the effective date of the Reconsideration Order has been
stayed pending the appeal. The Company cannot predict with any certainty either the likely timing
or the outcome of the OMB determination or the appeal. If the Company ultimately is required to
comply with backup power requirements of this nature, the Company may need to purchase additional
equipment, spend additional capital, seek and receive additional state and local permits,
authorizations and approvals, and incur additional operating expenses to comply with the
Reconsideration Order and such costs could be material. The Company could be forced to also
discontinue service from some sites or in some areas due to the new rules.
Litigation
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June
16, 2006, for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless
Communication Services and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by
Leap, or the 497 Leap Litigation. The complaint sought both injunctive relief and monetary
damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for the Companys alleged willful
infringement by the Companys wireless communication systems and associated services of the 497
Patent. The Company answered the complaint, raised a number of affirmative defenses, and together
with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities and certain
current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In the Companys counterclaims, the
Company claimed that it did not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent and the
Company asserted claims for constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and disclosure of
trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, breach of a confidential relationship,
and fraud. The Companys counterclaims sought monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent was invalid and that
Royal Street Communications did not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent.
The Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW. In February
2008, Leap answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street Communications, alleging
that Royal Street Communications willfully infringed the 497 Patent and seeking both injunctive
relief and monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for Royal Street
Communications alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems and associated
services of the 497 Patent.
On August 15, 2006, the Company filed an action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus
County, Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective
business advantage, and trespass. In this action, the Company sought monetary and punitive damages
and injunctive relief. The Company amended its complaint in response to demurrers and motions
filed by Leap and Orders of the Court. On September 22, 2008, the defendants were ordered by the
Court to answer the Companys complaint.
On September 26, 2008, Leap, Royal Street, the Company and the other defendants in the above
three actions settled the above actions and released all claims against the other parties related
to the above actions. The parties filed motions with the respective Courts dismissing the
respective actions with prejudice, which the respective Courts have granted.
The Company also tendered the 497 Leap Litigation to the manufacturer of the Companys
network infrastructure equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent
declined to indemnify and defend the Company. The Company filed a petition in state district court
in Harrison County, Texas, Cause No. 07-0710, for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is
obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend and hold the Company harmless from the 497 Leap
Litigation and for specific performance, for injunctive relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel
Lucent responded to the Companys petition and requested that the Court dismiss, abate, stay, and
deny every claim in the Companys petition asserted against Alcatel Lucent and order the Company to
amend the petition. The Company responded to Alcatel Lucents request. After the settlement with
Leap, on September 29,
14
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2008, the Company filed a Notice of Nonsuit to dismiss this action without
prejudice, and, on October 1, 2008, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice.
In addition, the Company is involved in other litigation from time to time, including
litigation regarding intellectual property claims, that the Company considers to be in the normal
course of business. The Company is not currently party to any pending legal proceedings that
it believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
103,361 |
|
|
$ |
112,641 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
Non-cash investing activities:
Net changes in the Companys accrued purchases of property, plant and equipment were $96.4
million and $11.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Assets acquired under capital lease obligations were $29.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Non-cash financing activities:
The Company accrued dividends of $6.5 million related to the Series D Preferred Stock for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The Company accrued dividends of $0.9 million related to the Series E Preferred Stock for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
16. Related-Party Transactions:
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own in the
aggregate an approximate 17% interest in a company that provides services to the Companys
customers, including handset insurance programs and roadside assistance services. Pursuant to the
Companys agreement with this related party, the Company bills its customers directly for these
services and remits the fees collected from its customers for these services to the related party.
Accruals for the fees that the Company collected from its customers are included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company had the
following transactions with this related party (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Fees received by the Company as
compensation for providing
billing and collection services |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
Handsets sold to the related party |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
15
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Accruals for fees collected from customers |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
Receivables from the related party included in accounts receivable |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
One of the Companys former directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own an interest in
a company that provides cell site leases to the Company. During the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1
million, respectively, for cell site leases. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded rent expense of approximately $0.2 million,
and $0.2 million, respectively, for cell site leases. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, the Company owed approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, to this related
party for deferred rent liability related to these cell site leases that is included in deferred
rents on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company paid approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively, to a law firm for professional services, a partner of which
is related to a Company executive officer.
17. Segment Information:
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had thirteen operating segments based on geographic
region within the United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, Miami, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco and
Tampa/Sarasota. Each of these operating segments provides wireless voice and data services and
products to customers in its service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to
provide these services. These services include unlimited local and long distance calling,
voicemail, caller ID, call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and
multimedia messaging, domestic and international long distance, international text messaging,
ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones,
nationwide roaming, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail, location
services and other value-added services.
The Company aggregates its operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and
Expansion Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia and Tampa/Sarasota, are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which the Company launches service in that
operating segment. Expenses associated with the Companys national data center and national
operations center are allocated based on the average number of customers in each operating segment.
There are no transactions between reportable segments.
16
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal evaluation purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
371,739 |
|
|
$ |
238,952 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
610,691 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
43,675 |
|
|
|
32,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,030 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
415,414 |
|
|
|
271,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,721 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
108,379 |
|
|
|
111,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,423 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
84,383 |
|
|
|
76,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,538 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
43,658 |
|
|
|
72,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,654 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
182,189 |
|
|
|
18,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,679 |
|
|
|
29,663 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
67,631 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
7,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,782 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
143,585 |
|
|
|
(18,643 |
) |
|
|
(4,289 |
) |
|
|
120,653 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,950 |
|
|
|
42,950 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
143,585 |
|
|
|
(18,643 |
) |
|
|
(45,348 |
) |
|
|
79,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
358,245 |
|
|
$ |
130,886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
48,165 |
|
|
|
19,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,607 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
406,410 |
|
|
|
150,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,738 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
108,077 |
|
|
|
55,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,671 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
87,232 |
|
|
|
43,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
40,651 |
|
|
|
43,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
170,983 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,691 |
|
|
|
12,769 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,107 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
140,752 |
|
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
133,138 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
140,752 |
|
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(48,545 |
) |
|
|
86,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
1,118,610 |
|
|
$ |
652,612 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,771,222 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
151,555 |
|
|
|
105,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,660 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,270,165 |
|
|
|
757,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,027,882 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
326,287 |
|
|
|
287,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,036 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
282,272 |
|
|
|
238,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,783 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
131,484 |
|
|
|
202,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,448 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
540,050 |
|
|
|
48,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
97,914 |
|
|
|
74,171 |
|
|
|
13,734 |
|
|
|
185,819 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
9,928 |
|
|
|
20,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,254 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
427,847 |
|
|
|
(45,785 |
) |
|
|
(13,737 |
) |
|
|
368,325 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,032 |
|
|
|
136,032 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
427,847 |
|
|
|
(45,785 |
) |
|
|
(150,325 |
) |
|
|
231,737 |
|
17
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
1,051,727 |
|
|
$ |
356,261 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
168,535 |
|
|
|
68,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
1,220,262 |
|
|
|
424,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
319,123 |
|
|
|
152,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,233 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
290,160 |
|
|
|
147,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1) |
|
|
128,335 |
|
|
|
111,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (2) |
|
|
489,175 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
87,008 |
|
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,532 |
|
|
|
12,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
394,378 |
|
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
367,877 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
394,378 |
|
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(128,334 |
) |
|
|
244,374 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $0.9 million
and $0.6 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. Cost of
service for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $2.1 million and $1.3
million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes $9.9
million and $6.5 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation disclosed separately.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 includes $28.2 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation
disclosed separately. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of the
Companys ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements and to fund future growth. |
The following table reconciles segment Adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 to consolidated income before provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
182,189 |
|
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
$ |
540,050 |
|
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
18,699 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
48,819 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
200,888 |
|
|
|
184,499 |
|
|
|
588,869 |
|
|
|
514,263 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(67,631 |
) |
|
|
(45,493 |
) |
|
|
(185,819 |
) |
|
|
(125,996 |
) |
(Loss) gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
(4,471 |
) |
|
|
(1,419 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(10,782 |
) |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
(30,254 |
) |
|
|
(18,971 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(42,950 |
) |
|
|
(54,574 |
) |
|
|
(136,032 |
) |
|
|
(152,718 |
) |
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(746 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
23,317 |
|
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
44,968 |
|
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
(2,956 |
) |
|
|
(15,007 |
) |
|
|
(20,037 |
) |
|
|
(15,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
79,594 |
|
|
$ |
86,620 |
|
|
$ |
231,737 |
|
|
$ |
244,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Guarantor Subsidiaries:
In connection with Wireless sale of the 91/4% Senior Notes and the entry into the Senior
Secured Credit Facility, MetroPCS and all of MetroPCS subsidiaries, other than Wireless and Royal
Street (the guarantor subsidiaries), provided guarantees on the 91/4% Senior Notes and Senior
Secured Credit Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several.
Certain provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4%
Senior Notes restrict the ability of Wireless to loan funds to MetroPCS. However, Wireless is
allowed to make certain permitted payments to MetroPCS under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit
Facility and the indenture relating to the 91/4% Senior Notes. Royal Street (the non-guarantor
subsidiaries) is not a guarantor of the 91/4% Senior Notes or the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
The following information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets as of September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 of the parent company (MetroPCS), the issuer
(Wireless), the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-
18
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
guarantor subsidiaries (Royal Street). Investments in subsidiaries held by the parent company
and the issuer have been presented using the equity method of accounting.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
837,169 |
|
|
$ |
159,682 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
22,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,020,392 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,579 |
|
|
|
9,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,495 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,306 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
27,081 |
|
|
|
35,097 |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,798 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,337 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,336 |
|
|
|
(218,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
19,187 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
838,265 |
|
|
|
553,176 |
|
|
|
64,826 |
|
|
|
38,718 |
|
|
|
(218,060 |
) |
|
|
1,276,925 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,722 |
|
|
|
2,114,108 |
|
|
|
376,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,514,435 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
16,774 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,945 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
611,842 |
|
|
|
1,687,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,299,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,097,744 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,391,343 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,026 |
|
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
15,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,466,881 |
|
|
$ |
3,063,707 |
|
|
$ |
4,299,887 |
|
|
$ |
724,014 |
|
|
$ |
(3,276,514 |
) |
|
$ |
6,277,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
226,786 |
|
|
$ |
320,318 |
|
|
$ |
26,632 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
573,736 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,492 |
|
Current payable to subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,336 |
|
|
|
208,724 |
|
|
|
(218,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,139 |
|
|
|
110,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,536 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(558,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,224,529 |
) |
|
|
1,782,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(558,049 |
) |
|
|
(955,546 |
) |
|
|
2,227,113 |
|
|
|
235,727 |
|
|
|
(218,060 |
) |
|
|
731,185 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972,308 |
|
|
|
28,367 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,001,265 |
|
Long-term payable to
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759,214 |
|
|
|
(759,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,410 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,604 |
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,047 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,724 |
|
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(558,049 |
) |
|
|
2,451,865 |
|
|
|
2,329,927 |
|
|
|
1,006,576 |
|
|
|
(977,274 |
) |
|
|
4,253,045 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,564,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,564,883 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
473,275 |
|
|
|
625,597 |
|
|
|
1,969,960 |
|
|
|
(302,562 |
) |
|
|
(2,292,995 |
) |
|
|
473,275 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(13,263 |
) |
|
|
(13,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,755 |
|
|
|
(13,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,024,930 |
|
|
|
611,842 |
|
|
|
1,969,960 |
|
|
|
(282,562 |
) |
|
|
(2,299,240 |
) |
|
|
2,024,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,466,881 |
|
|
$ |
3,063,707 |
|
|
$ |
4,299,887 |
|
|
$ |
724,014 |
|
|
$ |
(3,276,514 |
) |
|
$ |
6,277,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
801,472 |
|
|
$ |
633,277 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
35,015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,470,208 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,904 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,139 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
Prepaid charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,485 |
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,469 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,635 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
Current receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
803,841 |
|
|
|
974,793 |
|
|
|
69,913 |
|
|
|
39,095 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
1,732,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,636 |
|
|
|
1,546,647 |
|
|
|
300,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891,411 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
36,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,362,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,296 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,895 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
Long-term receivable from
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,524 |
|
|
|
6,442 |
|
|
|
13,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
(2,607,051 |
) |
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
154,205 |
|
|
$ |
244,913 |
|
|
$ |
40,254 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,449 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,758 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,369 |
|
|
|
96,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,481 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(537,540 |
) |
|
|
(949,296 |
) |
|
|
1,486,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
(754,598 |
) |
|
|
1,832,072 |
|
|
|
195,237 |
|
|
|
(154,758 |
) |
|
|
580,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,986,177 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,191 |
|
|
|
(618,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,128 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,939 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,723 |
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(537,463 |
) |
|
|
2,571,462 |
|
|
|
1,876,648 |
|
|
|
819,686 |
|
|
|
(772,949 |
) |
|
|
3,957,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES (See Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
1,524,769 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
|
|
485,871 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(193,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,828,581 |
) |
|
|
338,411 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
(14,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
(14,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
471,392 |
|
|
|
1,535,755 |
|
|
|
(173,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,834,102 |
) |
|
|
1,848,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,311,283 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,403 |
|
|
$ |
646,641 |
|
|
$ |
(2,607,051 |
) |
|
$ |
5,806,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
611,590 |
|
|
$ |
28,336 |
|
|
$ |
(29,235 |
) |
|
$ |
610,691 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
74,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
685,622 |
|
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
|
(29,235 |
) |
|
|
686,721 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,440 |
|
|
|
23,218 |
|
|
|
(29,235 |
) |
|
|
219,423 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
158,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,538 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
110,879 |
|
|
|
5,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,654 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
57,019 |
|
|
|
10,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,631 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
553,822 |
|
|
|
39,431 |
|
|
|
(29,235 |
) |
|
|
566,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
131,800 |
|
|
|
(11,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,653 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,031 |
|
|
|
(7,864 |
) |
|
|
23,459 |
|
|
|
(24,676 |
) |
|
|
42,950 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(43,580 |
) |
|
|
(105,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(4,256 |
) |
|
|
(25,558 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
24,676 |
|
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(44,880 |
) |
|
|
(78,346 |
) |
|
|
(7,811 |
) |
|
|
23,380 |
|
|
|
148,716 |
|
|
|
41,059 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
44,880 |
|
|
|
78,294 |
|
|
|
139,611 |
|
|
|
(34,475 |
) |
|
|
(148,716 |
) |
|
|
79,594 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
43,580 |
|
|
$ |
139,611 |
|
|
$ |
(34,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(148,716 |
) |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
489,104 |
|
|
$ |
6,387 |
|
|
$ |
(7,100 |
) |
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
65,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
554,410 |
|
|
|
6,387 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
556,738 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,120 |
|
|
|
14,651 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
163,671 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
128,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
79,574 |
|
|
|
4,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,496 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44,557 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
407,958 |
|
|
|
20,440 |
|
|
|
(7,100 |
) |
|
|
423,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
146,452 |
|
|
|
(14,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,138 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,172 |
|
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
(18,063 |
) |
|
|
54,574 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(55,657 |
) |
|
|
(122,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(12,458 |
) |
|
|
(28,269 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
18,063 |
|
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(53,108 |
) |
|
|
(88,431 |
) |
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
11,833 |
|
|
|
178,245 |
|
|
|
46,518 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
|
89,170 |
|
|
|
148,473 |
|
|
|
(25,886 |
) |
|
|
(178,245 |
) |
|
|
86,620 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
55,658 |
|
|
$ |
148,473 |
|
|
$ |
(25,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(178,245 |
) |
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,774,340 |
|
|
$ |
68,073 |
|
|
$ |
(71,191 |
) |
|
$ |
1,771,222 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,401 |
|
|
|
247,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,401 |
|
|
|
2,021,599 |
|
|
|
68,073 |
|
|
|
(71,191 |
) |
|
|
2,027,882 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,423 |
|
|
|
64,804 |
|
|
|
(71,191 |
) |
|
|
614,036 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,892 |
|
|
|
511,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,783 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
318,124 |
|
|
|
15,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,448 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
157,934 |
|
|
|
27,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,819 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,560 |
|
|
|
1,612,811 |
|
|
|
108,377 |
|
|
|
(71,191 |
) |
|
|
1,659,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
408,788 |
|
|
|
(40,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
368,325 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,672 |
|
|
|
(25,405 |
) |
|
|
69,825 |
|
|
|
(74,060 |
) |
|
|
136,032 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(139,725 |
) |
|
|
(324,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(15,176 |
) |
|
|
(78,678 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
74,060 |
|
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(134,864 |
) |
|
|
(236,757 |
) |
|
|
(25,416 |
) |
|
|
69,212 |
|
|
|
464,413 |
|
|
|
136,588 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
134,864 |
|
|
|
236,598 |
|
|
|
434,204 |
|
|
|
(109,516 |
) |
|
|
(464,413 |
) |
|
|
231,737 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
139,725 |
|
|
$ |
434,204 |
|
|
$ |
(109,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(464,413 |
) |
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,895 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,902 |
|
|
$ |
16,153 |
|
|
$ |
(17,962 |
) |
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,947 |
|
|
|
227,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,842 |
|
|
|
1,635,567 |
|
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
1,644,600 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
expense shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,068 |
|
|
|
37,127 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
471,233 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,617 |
|
|
|
429,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
225,638 |
|
|
|
14,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,150 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
123,463 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
1,231,894 |
|
|
|
53,843 |
|
|
|
(17,962 |
) |
|
|
1,276,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
403,673 |
|
|
|
(37,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,877 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,309 |
|
|
|
(5,381 |
) |
|
|
32,832 |
|
|
|
(47,042 |
) |
|
|
152,718 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(141,359 |
) |
|
|
(340,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(21,202 |
) |
|
|
(68,878 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1,907 |
) |
|
|
47,042 |
|
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(147,554 |
) |
|
|
(236,285 |
) |
|
|
(5,404 |
) |
|
|
30,925 |
|
|
|
481,821 |
|
|
|
123,503 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
|
238,179 |
|
|
|
409,077 |
|
|
|
(68,615 |
) |
|
|
(481,821 |
) |
|
|
244,374 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
141,359 |
|
|
$ |
409,077 |
|
|
$ |
(68,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(481,821 |
) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
139,725 |
|
|
$ |
434,204 |
|
|
$ |
(109,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(464,413 |
) |
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
157,934 |
|
|
|
27,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,819 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,268 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,254 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
24,879 |
|
|
|
(24,883 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
Impairment loss in investment securities |
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,484 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(128,943 |
) |
|
|
(395,295 |
) |
|
|
(50,771 |
) |
|
|
(8,181 |
) |
|
|
619,227 |
|
|
|
36,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
25,958 |
|
|
|
(159,047 |
) |
|
|
591,428 |
|
|
|
(60,363 |
) |
|
|
129,931 |
|
|
|
527,907 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,814 |
|
|
|
(589,736 |
) |
|
|
(81,168 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(660,771 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
Proceeds from sale of plant & equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Purchase of FCC licenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314,567 |
) |
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,163 |
) |
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(316,390 |
) |
|
|
(591,246 |
) |
|
|
(80,954 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(991,234 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
Proceeds from long-term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
(275,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,530 |
) |
|
|
8,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,220 |
) |
|
|
139,220 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,217 |
|
|
|
(127,250 |
) |
|
|
13,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
35,697 |
|
|
|
(473,595 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(12,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449,816 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
801,472 |
|
|
|
633,277 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
35,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
837,169 |
|
|
$ |
159,682 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
22,915 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,020,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
|
$ |
141,359 |
|
|
$ |
409,077 |
|
|
$ |
(68,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(481,821 |
) |
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
123,463 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,876 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
|
|
(30,658 |
) |
|
|
2,657 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(5,159 |
) |
|
|
(3,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,523 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
Impairment loss in investment securities |
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,257 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(156,781 |
) |
|
|
(338,814 |
) |
|
|
(188,771 |
) |
|
|
(3,191 |
) |
|
|
716,536 |
|
|
|
28,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
(102,124 |
) |
|
|
371,430 |
|
|
|
(33,534 |
) |
|
|
204,057 |
|
|
|
440,450 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,236 |
) |
|
|
(364,009 |
) |
|
|
(95,246 |
) |
|
|
(14,210 |
) |
|
|
(525,701 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,172 |
) |
|
|
(7,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,523 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
Cash used in business acquisitions |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(2,037,803 |
) |
|
|
(1,320,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,358,427 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
1,884,172 |
|
|
|
1,617,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,501,457 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(154,300 |
) |
|
|
242,809 |
|
|
|
(371,303 |
) |
|
|
(95,508 |
) |
|
|
(14,210 |
) |
|
|
(392,512 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,021 |
|
Proceeds from long-term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,000 |
|
|
|
(196,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from 91/4 % Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,500 |
|
Proceeds from initial public offering |
|
|
862,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862,500 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,225 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,484 |
) |
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
823,423 |
|
|
|
432,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,255 |
|
|
|
(189,847 |
) |
|
|
1,254,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
669,744 |
|
|
|
573,678 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
59,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,762 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
99,301 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
46,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
685,458 |
|
|
$ |
672,979 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
105,439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,464,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
19. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, (SFAS No.
141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of
the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R).
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, (SFAS No. 160), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a
parents ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is prohibited. The Company has not yet
determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of
SFAS No. 160.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
requires enhanced disclosures about a companys derivative and hedging activities. These enhanced
disclosures will discuss (a) how and why a company uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related
interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal
years beginning on or after November 15, 2008, with earlier adoption allowed. The Company has not
yet determined the effect on its financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon
adoption of SFAS No. 161.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets, (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet determined the effect on its
financial condition or results of operations, if any, upon adoption of FSP 142-3.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements. SFAS No.
162 is effective 60 days following the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC)
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments (PCAOB) to AU Section 411,
The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
SEC approved the PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411 on September 16, 2008. SFAS No. 162 is
effective on November 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard will not have a material
impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit
Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation
No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161, (FSP 133-1 and FIN
45-4). FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends and enhances disclosure requirements for sellers of credit
derivatives and financial guarantees. It also clarifies that the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 161 are effective for quarterly periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and fiscal years
that include those periods. FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is effective for reporting periods (annual or
interim) ending after November 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard will not have a
material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
27
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In September 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-5, Issuers Accounting for Liabilities
Measured at Fair Value With a Third-Party Credit Enhancement, (EITF 08-5). EITF 08-5 provides
guidance for measuring liabilities issued with an attached third-party credit enhancement (such as
a guarantee). It clarifies that the issuer of a liability with a third-party credit enhancement
(such as a guarantee) should not include the effect of the credit enhancement in the fair value
measurement of the liability. EITF 08-5 is effective for the first reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet determined the effect on its financial condition or
results of operations, if any, upon adoption of EITF 08-5.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a
Market That Is Not Active, (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarified the application of SFAS No. 157 in
an inactive market. It demonstrates how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the
market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior
periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of this standard did
not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
20. Subsequent Events:
In October 2008, the Company entered into an agreement for the acquisition of spectrum in the
amount of approximately $0.2 million. Consummation of this acquisition is conditioned upon
customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
28
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and should be evaluated as
such. Forward-looking statements include information concerning any possible or assumed future
results of operations, including statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies,
goals, future events, future revenues or performance, future penetration rates, planned market
launches, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical
information. Forward-looking statements often include words such as anticipate, expect,
suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates, targets, projects, would, should,
could, may, will, continue, forecast, and other similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are contained throughout this report, including Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Legal Proceedings, and Risk
Factors.
We base the forward-looking statements or projections made in this report on our current
expectations, plans and assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry,
as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments
and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances and at such times. As you
read and consider this report, you should understand that these forward-looking statements or
projections are not guarantees of future performance or results. Although we believe that these
forward-looking statements and projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are
made, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance
or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in the forward-looking statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such
forward-looking statements and projections include:
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of our industry; |
|
|
|
|
the rapid technological changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
an economic slowdown or recession in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
the state of the capital markets and the United States economy; |
|
|
|
|
our exposure to counterparty risk in our financial agreements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain the growth rates we have experienced to date; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to construct and launch future markets within projected time frames; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve our
financial and disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to clear the Auction 66 spectrum of incumbent licensees; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately enforce or protect our intellectual property rights or defend
against suits filed by others; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of our services and the costs of compliance and our failure to
comply with such regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our capital structure, including our indebtedness amounts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; |
29
|
|
|
our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors described under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended
March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, as updated or supplemented in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
These forward-looking statements and projections speak only as to the date made and are
subject to and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, many of which are beyond our control
or ability to predict and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements
and projections. All future written and oral forward-looking statements and projections
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our
cautionary statements. We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any
forward-looking statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or
circumstances, except as required by law.
Company Overview
Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are those of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including MetroPCS
Wireless, Inc. and Royal Street Communications, LLC. References to MetroPCS, MetroPCS
Communications, our Company, the Company, we, our, ours and us refer to MetroPCS
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unless otherwise
indicated, all share numbers and per share prices give effect to a 3 for 1 stock split effected by
means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. On April 18, 2007, the registration
statement for our initial public offering became effective and our common stock began trading on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS on April 19, 2007. We consummated our initial
public offering of our common stock on April 24, 2007.
We are a wireless telecommunications carrier that currently offers wireless services primarily
in the greater Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami,
Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Sacramento and Tampa/Sarasota metropolitan
areas. We launched service in the greater Atlanta, Miami and Sacramento metropolitan areas in the
first quarter of 2002; in San Francisco in September 2002; in Tampa/Sarasota in October 2005; in
Dallas/Ft. Worth in March 2006; in Detroit in April 2006; in Orlando in November 2006; in Los
Angeles in September 2007; in Las Vegas in March 2008; in Jacksonville in April 2008; and in
Philadelphia in July 2008. In 2005, Royal Street Communications, LLC, or Royal Street
Communications, and with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, or collectively, Royal Street, was granted
licenses by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, in Los Angeles and various metropolitan
areas throughout northern Florida. We own 85% of the limited liability company member interests in
Royal Street, but may only elect two of the five members of Royal Street Communications management
committee. We have a wholesale arrangement with Royal Street under which we purchase up to 85% of
the engineered capacity of Royal Streets systems allowing us to sell our standard products and
services under the MetroPCS brand to the public. Royal Street has constructed, or is in the
process of constructing, its network infrastructure in its licensed metropolitan areas. We
commenced commercial services in Orlando and certain portions of northern Florida in November 2006
and in Los Angeles in September 2007 through our arrangements with Royal Street. Additionally,
upon Royal Streets request, we have provided and will provide financing to Royal Street under a
loan agreement. On April 2, 2008, we executed an amendment to the loan agreement which increased
the amount available to Royal Street under the loan agreement by an additional $255.0 million. On
June 12, we executed an additional amendment to the loan agreement which increased the amount
available to Royal Street under the loan agreement by an additional $75.0 million. As of September
30, 2008, the maximum amount that Royal Street could borrow from us under the loan agreement was
approximately $1.0 billion of which Royal Street had borrowed $865.0 million through September 30,
2008. On October 21, 2008, Royal Street borrowed an additional $35.0 million under the loan
agreement.
As a result of the significant growth we have experienced since we launched operations, our
results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected in
future periods. Moreover, we expect that our number of customers will continue to increase, which
will continue to contribute to increases in our revenues and operating expenses. In November 2006,
we were granted advanced wireless services, or AWS, licenses in Auction 66, currently covering a
total population of approximately 125 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$1.4 billion. Approximately 82 million of the total licensed population associated with our
30
Auction 66 licenses represent expansion opportunities in geographic areas outside of our then
current operating markets, which we refer to as our Auction 66 Markets. These new expansion
opportunities in our Auction 66 Markets cover six of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the
United States. The balance of our Auction 66 Markets, which currently cover a population of
approximately 43 million, supplements or expands the geographic boundaries of our and Royal
Streets then existing operations in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Francisco and
Sacramento. We currently plan to focus on building out networks to cover approximately 40 million
of total population during 2009-2010 including the launch of the Boston and New York metropolitan
areas in early 2009. Our initial launch dates will be accomplished in phases in the larger
metropolitan areas.
We participated as a bidder in FCC Auction No. 73 and on June 26, 2008, we were granted one 12
MHz Lower Band Block A license for the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode
Island/Vermont Economic Area, or the 700 MHz License, for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $313.3 million. The 700 MHz License supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless
spectrum previously granted to us in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode
Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result of FCC Auction No. 66.
We sell products and services to customers through our Company-owned retail stores as well as
indirectly through relationships with independent retailers. We offer service which allows our
customers to place unlimited local calls from within our local service area and to receive
unlimited calls from any area while in our local service area, under simple and affordable flat
monthly rate service plans starting at $30 per month. For an additional $5 to $20 per month, our
customers may select a service plan that offers additional services, such as unlimited voicemail,
caller ID, call waiting, enhanced directory assistance, unlimited text messaging, mobile Internet
browsing, push e-mail, mobile instant messaging, picture and multimedia messaging and the ability
to place unlimited long distance calls from within our local service calling area to any number in
the continental United States. We offer flat-rate monthly plans at $30, $35, $40, $45 and $50, as
well as Family Plans which offer discounts off our monthly plans for multiple lines. All of these
plans require payment in advance for one month of service. If no payment is made in advance for the
following month of service, service is discontinued at the end of the month that was paid for by
the customer. For additional fees, we also provide international long distance and international
text messaging, ringtones, ring back tones, downloads, games and content applications, unlimited
directory assistance, location services and other value-added services. As of September 30, 2008,
over 83% of our customers have selected a $40 or higher rate plan. Our flat-rate plans
differentiate our service from the more complex plans and long-term contract requirements of
traditional wireless carriers. In addition, the above products and services are offered by us in
the Royal Street markets under the MetroPCS brand.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We have
discussed those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in
their application in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on
February 29, 2008.
Other than the adoption of SFAS No. 157, our critical accounting policies and the
methodologies and assumptions we apply under them have not materially changed from our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Revenues
We derive our revenues from the following sources:
Service. We sell wireless broadband PCS and AWS services, or PCS services. The various types
of service revenues associated with wireless broadband PCS for our customers include monthly
recurring charges for airtime, monthly recurring charges for optional features (including
nationwide long distance, unlimited text messaging, international text messaging, voicemail,
downloads, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory assistance, enhanced
directory assistance, ring back tones, mobile Internet browsing, mobile instant messaging, push
31
e-mail, location services and nationwide roaming) and charges for domestic and international
long distance service. Service revenues also include intercarrier compensation and nonrecurring
activation service charges to customers.
Equipment. We sell wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories that are used by our
customers in connection with our wireless services. This equipment is also sold to our independent
retailers to facilitate distribution to our customers.
Costs and Expenses
Our costs and expenses include:
Cost of Service. The major components of our cost of service are:
|
|
|
Cell Site Costs. We incur expenses for the rent of cell sites, network
facilities, engineering operations, field technicians and related utility and
maintenance charges. |
|
|
|
|
Intercarrier Compensation. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies
for their transport and termination of calls originated by our customers and destined
for customers of other networks. These variable charges are based on our customers
usage and generally applied at pre-negotiated rates with other carriers, although some
carriers have sought to impose such charges unilaterally. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Long Distance. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies for
long distance service provided to our customers. These variable charges are based on
our customers usage, applied at pre-negotiated rates with the long distance carriers. |
Cost of Equipment. We purchase wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories from
third-party vendors to resell to our customers and independent retailers in connection with our
services. We subsidize the sale of handsets to encourage the sale and use of our services. We do
not manufacture any of this equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling expense includes advertising and
promotional costs associated with marketing and selling to new customers and fixed charges such as
retail store rent and retail associates salaries. General and administrative expense includes
support functions including, technical operations, finance, accounting, human resources,
information technology and legal services. We record stock-based compensation expense in cost of
service and in selling, general and administrative expenses for expense associated with employee
stock options, which is measured at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the
award.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service, which are seven to ten
years for network infrastructure assets and capitalized interest, three to seven years for office
equipment, which includes computer equipment, three to seven years for furniture and fixtures and
five years for vehicles. Leasehold improvements and capital lease assets are amortized over the
term of the respective leases, which includes renewal periods that are reasonably assured, or the
estimated useful life of the asset or improvement, whichever is shorter.
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Interest expense includes interest incurred on our
borrowings, capital lease obligations, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of
discounts and premiums on long-term debt. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash and cash
equivalents.
Income
Taxes. As a result of our tax net operating losses which are
primarily related to accelerated tax depreciation available under
federal tax laws, we paid an insignificant amount of federal income taxes during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we paid approximately
$0.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in state income taxes. During the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, we paid approximately $0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively,
in state income taxes.
32
Seasonality
Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling
periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical results,
we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth quarters.
Softening of sales and increased customer turnover, or churn, in the second and third quarters of
the year usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions. However, sales activity and
churn can be strongly affected by the launch of new markets, new service offerings and promotional
activity, which have the ability to reduce or outweigh certain seasonal effects.
Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131 Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.
As of September 30, 2008, we had thirteen operating segments based on geographic region within
the United States: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New
York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Tampa/Sarasota. Each of
these operating segments provide wireless voice and data services and products to customers in its
service areas or is currently constructing a network in order to provide these services. These
services include unlimited local and long distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting,
enhanced directory assistance, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging, domestic and
international long distance, international text messaging, ringtones, games and content
applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet
browsing, mobile instant messaging, push e-mail, location services and other value-added services.
We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and Expansion
Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, Sacramento and San Francisco, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Boston, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, New York, Orlando/Jacksonville, Philadelphia, and Tampa/Sarasota are aggregated
because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they
are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes, class of
customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected
long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which we launch service in that operating
segment. Expenses associated with our national data center are allocated based on the average
number of customers in each operating segment. All intercompany transactions between reportable
segments have been eliminated in the presentation of operating segment data.
Interest and certain other expenses, interest income and income taxes are not allocated to the
segments in the computation of segment operating profit for internal evaluation purposes.
33
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
371,739 |
|
|
$ |
358,245 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
238,952 |
|
|
|
130,886 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
610,691 |
|
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
43,675 |
|
|
$ |
48,165 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
32,355 |
|
|
|
19,442 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,030 |
|
|
$ |
67,607 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
108,379 |
|
|
$ |
108,077 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
111,044 |
|
|
|
55,594 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
219,423 |
|
|
$ |
163,671 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
84,383 |
|
|
$ |
87,232 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
76,155 |
|
|
|
43,947 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160,538 |
|
|
$ |
131,179 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization disclosed
separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
43,658 |
|
|
$ |
40,651 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
72,996 |
|
|
|
43,845 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
116,654 |
|
|
$ |
84,496 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
182,189 |
|
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
18,699 |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
33,679 |
|
|
$ |
30,691 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
29,663 |
|
|
|
12,769 |
|
|
|
132 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
111 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
67,631 |
|
|
$ |
45,493 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
3,196 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
501 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
7,586 |
|
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,782 |
|
|
$ |
7,107 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
143,585 |
|
|
$ |
140,752 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(18,643 |
) |
|
|
(5,587 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(4,289 |
) |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
120,653 |
|
|
$ |
133,138 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, cost of service includes
$0.9 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $9.9 million of
stock-based compensation expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, cost of
service includes $0.6 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $6.5
million of stock-based compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our
ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and
to fund future growth. |
34
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $121.6 million, or approximately 25%, to $610.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $489.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets
service revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $13.5 million, or approximately
4%, to $371.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $358.2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net customer additions of approximately 268,000 customers for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2008, which accounted for $37.3 million of the Core Markets
increase, partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced
revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were previously
provided a la carte, accounting for a $18.1 million decrease. In addition, consolidated
E-911, Federal Universal Service Fund, or FUSF, vendors compensation and activation
revenues increased $7.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to a 32% increase in
our consolidated customer base since September 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. On January
1, 2008, we began allocating a portion of these revenues to the Expansion Markets. The
portion of these revenues that were allocated to the Expansion Markets during the three
months ended September 30, 2008 was $13.4 million, resulting in a net decrease of $5.7
million in the Core Markets when to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $108.1 million, or
approximately 83%, to $239.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from
$130.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in service
revenues is primarily attributable to net customer additions of 915,000 customers for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2008, which accounted for $108.3 million of the Expansion
Markets increase, partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and
reduced revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were
previously provided a la carte, accounting for an $13.6 million decrease. In addition,
E-911, FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased approximately $13.4
million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due primarily to the allocation of a portion of these revenues to the Expansion
Markets beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $8.4 million, or 12%, to $76.0 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $67.6 million for the three months ended September
30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $4.5 million, or 9%, to $43.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $48.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to a lower average price of handsets activated reducing equipment revenues by
$5.2 million, partially offset by an increase in upgrade handset sales to existing
customers which accounted for a $0.7 million increase in equipment revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $12.9 million, or
66%, to $32.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $19.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 262,000 customers
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, which
accounted for $6.1 million of the Expansion Markets increase, an increase in upgrade
handset sales to existing customers which accounted for $5.8 million of the increase and an
increase of approximately $0.7 million in additional accessory sales. |
35
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $55.7 million, or 34%, to $219.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from $163.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of service as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service for the three months ended September 30,
2008 was $108.4 million and remained relatively flat when compared to the same period in
2007. Core Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses) increased
$5.1 million, or 6%, to $88.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from
$82.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily
attributable to the 10% growth in our Core Markets customer base and the deployment of
additional network infrastructure during the twelve months ended September 30, 2008. In
addition, consolidated E-911, FUSF, and NECA/TRS expenses increased $8.6 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase
is primarily attributable to a 32% increase in our consolidated customer base since
September 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. On January 1, 2008, we began allocating a
portion of these expenses to the Expansion Markets. The portion of these expenses that were
allocated to the Expansion Markets during the three months ended September 30, 2008 was
$13.4 million, resulting in a net decrease of $4.8 million in the Core Markets when
compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $55.4 million, or
approximately 100%, to $111.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from
$55.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Expansion Markets cost of
service (excluding E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses) increased $42.0 million, or 77%, to
$97.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $55.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to the 84%
growth in our Expansion Markets customer base, coupled with expenses incurred as a result
of the launch of service in the Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan areas
as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York and Boston metropolitan areas.
In addition, E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses increased approximately $13.4 million during
the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily
to the allocation of a portion of these expenses to the Expansion Markets beginning on
January 1, 2008. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $29.4 million, or 22%, to $160.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $131.1 million for the three months ended September
30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $2.8 million, or 3%, to $84.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $87.2 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment is
primarily attributable to a lower average cost of handsets activated reducing cost of
equipment by $6.0 million as well as a decrease in cost of accessories accounting for $0.2
million. These decreases in cost of equipment were partially offset by an increase in
upgrade handset sales to existing customers which accounted for a $3.1 million increase as
well as an increase of $0.3 million in handset refurbishment cost. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $32.2 million, or 73%,
to $76.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $43.9 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment
is primarily attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately
262,000 customers for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same
period in 2007, which accounted for $19.6 million of the Expansion Markets increase,
coupled with an increase in the sale of handsets to existing customers accounting for $8.6
million of the increase as well as an increase of $1.0 million in handset refurbishment
cost and an increase in cost of accessories accounting for $0.3 million. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $32.2 million, or 38%, to $116.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
from $84.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due to increases
in Core Markets and Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
36
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.1
million to $43.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $40.6 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by $2.9 million,
or approximately 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in selling expenses is primarily
attributable to a $1.5 million increase in marketing and advertising expenses as well as
higher employee related costs of $1.6 million incurred to support the growth in the Core
Markets. General and administrative expenses decreased by $2.3 million, or 11% for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended September 30,
2007. This was due primarily to a decrease in various administrative expenses incurred as
a result of cost benefits achieved due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core
Markets. In addition, stock-based compensation expense increased $2.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 (see -
Stock-Based Compensation Expense below). |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $29.1 million, or 66%, to $73.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 from $43.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Selling expenses
increased by $20.3 million, or 125% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared
to the three months ended September 30, 2007. This increase is primarily due to a $10.3
million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth in
the Expansion Markets as well as higher employee related costs of $5.1 million to support
the growth and buildout of the Expansion Markets. General and administrative expenses
increased by $7.9 million, or 37% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007 primarily due to the 84% growth in our Expansion Markets customer
base, including the launch of service in the Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia
metropolitan areas, as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York and Boston
metropolitan areas. In addition, an increase of $0.9 million in stock-based compensation
expense contributed to the increase in the Expansion Markets (see
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense below). |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $22.1 million,
or approximately 49%, to $67.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $45.5
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases
in Core Markets and Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.0
million, or approximately 10%, to $33.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 from $30.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase
related primarily to additional network infrastructure assets placed into service during
the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 to support our continued growth. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$16.9 million, or 132%, to $29.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from
$12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase related
primarily to an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the
twelve months ended September 30, 2008 driven primarily by the launch of service in the Los
Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan areas. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $3.7 million, or
approximately 52%, to $10.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $7.1 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to increases in Core
Markets and Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $2.7 million, or
501%, to $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $0.5 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an
increase in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve
months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $1.0
million, or 15%, to $7.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $6.6
million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase in stock options
granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended September 30, 2008. |
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
|
$ |
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
247 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
42,950 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
(21 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
)% |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
(80 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
34,713 |
|
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
44,880 |
|
|
|
53,108 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets. Loss on disposal of assets increased $3.1 million to $1.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from a gain on disposal of assets of $1.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. During the three months ended September 30,
2008, we recorded a loss on disposal of assets related to certain network technology that was
retired and replaced with new technology.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $11.6 million, or 21%, to $43.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from $54.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the capitalization of $17.1 million of
interest during the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $8.4 million of interest
capitalized during the same period in 2007. We capitalize interest costs associated with our FCC
licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of such
capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in
progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction process. We expect
capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the Auction 66 Markets. In
addition, our weighted average interest rate decreased to 7.72% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to 8.13% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of
the borrowing rates under the senior secured credit facility. Average debt outstanding for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $3.0 billion.
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased $18.1 million, or 78%, to $5.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $23.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in interest and other income was primarily due to the Company
investing substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in money market funds consisting of
U.S. treasury securities rather than in short-term investments as the Company has done
historically.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our
substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the
United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money
market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we made
an original investment of $133.9 million in principal in certain auction rate securities that were
rated AAA/Aaa at the time of purchase, substantially all of which are secured by collateralized
debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related
to mortgage securities. With the continued liquidity issues experienced in global credit and
capital markets, the auction rate securities held by us at September 30, 2008 continue to
experience failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the auctions exceeds
the amount of purchase orders. We recognized an additional other-than-temporary impairment loss on
investment securities in the amount of $3.0 million during the three months ended September 30,
2008. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $34.7 million and $33.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate was 43.6% and
39.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our effective rates
differ from the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due to state and local taxes, non-deductible
expenses and an increase in the valuation allowance related to the impairment loss recognized on
investment securities during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net Income. Net income decreased $8.2 million, or 15%, to $44.9 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $53.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The decrease in net income
38
was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest and other income as well as a
decrease in income from operations. These items were partially offset by lower interest expense
and lower impairment loss on investment securities recognized during the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
1,118,610 |
|
|
$ |
1,051,727 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
652,612 |
|
|
|
356,261 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,771,222 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
151,555 |
|
|
$ |
168,535 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
105,105 |
|
|
|
68,077 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
256,660 |
|
|
$ |
236,612 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization
disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
326,287 |
|
|
$ |
319,123 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
287,749 |
|
|
|
152,110 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
614,036 |
|
|
$ |
471,233 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
282,272 |
|
|
$ |
290,160 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
238,511 |
|
|
|
147,765 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
520,783 |
|
|
$ |
437,925 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortization disclosed separately
below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
131,484 |
|
|
$ |
128,335 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
202,964 |
|
|
|
111,815 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
334,448 |
|
|
$ |
240,150 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
540,050 |
|
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
48,819 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
97,914 |
|
|
$ |
87,008 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
74,171 |
|
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
Other |
|
|
13,734 |
|
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
|
197 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
185,819 |
|
|
$ |
125,996 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
9,928 |
|
|
$ |
6,532 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
20,326 |
|
|
|
12,439 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,254 |
|
|
$ |
18,971 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
427,847 |
|
|
$ |
394,378 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(45,785 |
) |
|
|
(21,670 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
(13,737 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
368,325 |
|
|
$ |
367,877 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cost of service includes
$2.1 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $28.2 million of
stock-based compensation expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, cost of
service includes $1.3 million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $17.7
million of stock-based compensation expense. |
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our
ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and
to fund future growth. |
39
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $363.2 million, or approximately 26%, to $1.8
billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $1.4 billion for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service
revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $66.9 million, or 6%, to $1.1
billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $1.1 billion for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to
net customer additions of approximately 268,000 customers for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2008, which accounted for $118.7 million of the Core Markets increase,
partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and reduced revenue from
certain features now included in our service plans that were previously provided a la
carte, accounting for a $37.8 million decrease. In addition, consolidated E-911, Federal
Universal Service Fund, or FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased
$21.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period
in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to a 32% increase in our consolidated
customer base since September 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1,
2008, a portion of these revenues were allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of
$35.1 million resulting in a net decrease of $14.0 million in the Core Markets for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $296.3 million, or 83%,
to $652.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $356.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in service revenues is primarily
attributable to net customer additions of approximately 915,000 customers for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2008, which accounted for $292.2 million of the Expansion
Markets increase, partially offset by the higher participation in our Family Plans and
reduced revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were
previously provided a la carte, accounting for a $31.0 million decrease. In addition,
E-911, FUSF, vendors compensation and activation revenues increased approximately $35.1
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007
due primarily to the allocation of a portion of these revenues to the Expansion Markets
beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $20.0 million, or 8%, to $256.6 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $236.6 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets equipment revenues,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets equipment revenues as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues decreased $17.0 million, or 10%, to
$151.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $168.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to a lower average price of handsets activated reducing equipment revenues by
$20.3 million, partially offset by an increase in upgrade handset sales to existing
customers which accounted for a $2.6 million increase in equipment revenues as well as an
increase in accessory sales accounting for $0.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $37.0 million, or
54%, to $105.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $68.1 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily
attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately 552,000 customers
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, which
accounted for $22.2 million of the Expansion Markets increase, an increase in upgrade
handset sales to existing customers accounting for a $17.4 million increase and an increase
of approximately $2.5 million in additional accessory sales. These increases in equipment
revenues were partially offset by a lower average price of handsets activated which
accounted for a $5.1 million decrease. |
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $142.8 million, or 30%, to $614.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $471.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as
follows:
40
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $7.2 million, or 2%, to $326.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $319.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. Core Markets cost of service (excluding E-911, FUSF and
NECA/TRS expenses) increased $18.3 million, or 7%, to $266.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from $248.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The increase was primarily attributable to the 10% growth in our Core Markets customer base
and the deployment of additional network infrastructure during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2008. In addition, consolidated E-911, FUSF, and NECA/TRS expenses increased
$23.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period
in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to a 32% increase in our consolidated
customer base since September 30, 2007 and higher FUSF rates. Beginning on January 1,
2008, a portion of these expenses were allocated to the Expansion Markets in the amount of
$34.1 million resulting in a net decrease of $11.1 million in the Core Markets for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $135.6 million, or 89%,
to $287.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $152.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. Expansion Markets cost of service (excluding E-911,
FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses) increased $101.5 million, or approximately 68%, to $251.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $150.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to the 84%
growth in our Expansion Markets customer base, coupled with expenses associated with the
launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan
areas as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York and Boston metropolitan
areas. In addition, E-911, FUSF and NECA/TRS expenses increased approximately $34.1
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007
due primarily to the allocation of a portion of these expenses to the Expansion Markets
beginning on January 1, 2008. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $82.9 million, or 19%, to $520.8 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $437.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to an increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment,
partially offset by a decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment decreased $7.9 million, or approximately
3%, to $282.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $290.2 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in Core Markets cost of equipment
is primarily attributable to a lower average cost of handsets activated reducing cost of
equipment by $12.9 million, partially offset by an increase in upgrade handset sales to
existing customers accounting for $3.2 million as well as an increase of $1.7 million in
handset refurbishment expenses and an increase in cost of accessories due to an increase in
accessory sales accounting for a $0.1 million increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $90.8 million, or 61%,
to $238.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $147.7 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in Expansion Markets cost of equipment
is primarily attributable to an increase in gross customer additions of approximately
552,000 customers for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same
period in 2007, which accounted for $55.1 million of the Expansion Markets increase,
coupled with the sale of handsets to existing customers accounting for $31.7 million of the
increase as well as an increase of $2.9 million in handset refurbishment expenses and an
increase in cost of accessories due to an increase in accessory sales accounting for a $1.1
million increase. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $94.3 million, or 39%, to $334.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
from $240.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to
an increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as
follows:
41
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.2
million to $131.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $128.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Selling expenses increased by $8.5 million,
or 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in selling expenses is primarily attributable to a $4.9
million increase in marketing and advertising expenses as well as higher employee related costs of $2.8 million incurred to support the growth in the Core
Markets. General and administrative expenses decreased by $8.4 million, or approximately 13%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2007. This was due primarily to a decrease in various administrative expenses incurred
as a result of cost benefits achieved due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core
Markets. In addition, stock-based compensation expense increased $3.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 (see Stock-Based
Compensation Expense below). |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $91.1 million, or 82%, to $202.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 from $111.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Selling expenses
increased by $51.2 million, or 119% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase is primarily due to a $27.8
million increase in marketing and advertising expenses incurred to support the growth in
the Expansion Markets as well as higher employee related costs of $12.9 million to support
the growth and buildout of the Expansion Markets. General and administrative expenses
increased by $32.6 million, or approximately 58% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to the 84% growth in our Expansion
Markets customer base, including the launch of service in the Las Vegas, Jacksonville and
Philadelphia metropolitan areas, as well as the build-out expenses related to the New York
and Boston metropolitan areas. In addition, an increase of $7.4 million in stock-based
compensation expense contributed to the increase in the Expansion Markets (see
Stock-Based Compensation Expense below). |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $59.8 million,
or approximately 47%, to $185.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $126.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily due to increases
in Core Markets and Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $10.9
million, or approximately 13%, to $97.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 from $87.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase related
primarily to an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the
twelve months ended September 30, 2008 to support our continued growth. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$39.8 million, or approximately 116%, to $74.2 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 from $34.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase
related primarily to an increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service
during the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 driven primarily by the launch of service
in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan areas. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $11.3 million, or
approximately 59%, to $30.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $19.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is due primarily to increases in Core
Markets and Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $3.4 million, or
52%, to $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $6.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to an increase in
stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve months ended
September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $7.9
million, or 63%, to $20.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $12.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily related to
an increase in stock options granted to employees in these markets throughout the twelve
months ended September 30, 2008.
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
$ |
4,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
|
215 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
136,032 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
)% |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
96,873 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
134,864 |
|
|
|
147,554 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Loss on disposal of assets. Loss on disposal of assets increased $3.1 million to $4.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $1.4 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a loss on disposal of
assets related to certain network technology that was retired and replaced with new technology.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $16.7 million, or approximately 11%, to $136.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $152.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the capitalization of
$46.0 million of interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $21.2
million of interest capitalized during the same period in 2007. We capitalize interest costs
associated with our FCC licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new
market. The amount of such capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses
and construction in progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction
process. We expect capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the Auction
66 Markets. In addition, our weighted average interest rate decreased to 7.79% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to 8.16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as a result
of the borrowing rates under the senior secured credit facility. Average debt outstanding for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $3.0 billion compared to the average debt outstanding for
the nine months ending September 30, 2007 of $2.8 billion. The increase in average debt outstanding
was due to the issuance of an additional $400.0 million principal amount of our 91/4% senior notes in
June 2007.
Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income decreased $24.6 million, or 55%, to $20.4
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $45.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in interest and other income was primarily due to the Company
investing substantially all of its cash and cash equivalents in money market funds consisting of
U.S. treasury securities rather than in short-term investments as the Company has done
historically.
Impairment Loss on Investment Securities. We can and have historically invested our
substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities issued and fully guaranteed by the
United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and auction rate securities, money
market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These investments are subject to
credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we made
an original investment of $133.9 million in principal in certain auction rate securities that were
rated AAA/Aaa at the time of purchase, substantially all of which are secured by collateralized
debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage securities or related
to mortgage securities. With the continued liquidity issues experienced in global credit and
capital markets, the auction rate securities held by us at September 30, 2008 continue to
experience failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the auctions exceeds
the amount of purchase orders. We recognized an additional other-than-temporary impairment loss on
investment securities in the amount of $20.0 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. See Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $96.9 million and $96.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate was 41.8% and
40.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our effective rates
differ from the statutory federal rate of 35.0% due to state and local taxes, non-deductible
expenses and an increase in the valuation allowance related to the impairment loss recognized on
investment securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
43
Net Income. Net income decreased $12.7 million, or approximately 9%, to $134.9 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $147.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to a decrease in
interest and other income as well as a decrease in income from operations. These items were
partially offset by lower interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, we supplement the
information provided by financial statement measures with several customer-focused performance
metrics that are widely used in the wireless industry. These metrics include average revenue per
user per month, or ARPU, which measures service revenue per customer; cost per gross customer
addition, or CPGA, which measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer; cost per user per
month, or CPU, which measures the non-selling cash cost of operating our business on a per customer
basis; and churn, which measures turnover in our customer base. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP
performance measures and a further discussion of the measures, please read Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
The following table shows consolidated metric information for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
4,847,314 |
|
|
|
3,664,218 |
|
|
|
4,847,314 |
|
|
|
3,664,218 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
249,265 |
|
|
|
114,302 |
|
|
|
884,528 |
|
|
|
723,232 |
|
Churn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rate |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
40.42 |
|
|
$ |
42.77 |
|
|
$ |
41.43 |
|
|
$ |
43.22 |
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
123.52 |
|
|
$ |
125.92 |
|
|
$ |
126.35 |
|
|
$ |
118.99 |
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.18 |
|
|
$ |
17.81 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
|
$ |
18.11 |
|
Customers. Net customer additions were 249,265 for the three months ended September 30, 2008,
compared to 114,302 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of 118%. Net
customer additions were 884,528 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to 723,232
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of 22%. Total customers were 4,847,314
as of September 30, 2008, an increase of approximately 32% over the customer total as of September
30, 2007 and 22% over the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers
is primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service offerings and the launch of our
services in the Los Angeles metropolitan area in September 2007, the Las Vegas metropolitan area in
March 2008, the Jacksonville metropolitan area in April 2008 and the Philadelphia metropolitan area
in July 2008.
Churn. As we do not require a long-term service contract, we expect our churn percentage to be
higher than traditional wireless carriers that require customers to sign a one- to two-year
contract with significant early termination fees. Average monthly churn represents (a) the number
of customers who have been disconnected from our service during the measurement period less the
number of customers who have reactivated service, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly
number of customers during such period. We classify delinquent customers as churn after they have
been delinquent for 30 days. In addition, when an existing customer establishes a new account in
connection with the purchase of an upgraded or replacement phone and does not identify themselves
as an existing customer, we count that phone leaving service as a churn and the new phone entering
service as a gross customer addition. Churn for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
was 4.8% and 5.2%, respectively. Churn for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
4.5% and 4.7%, respectively. Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to
traditional retail selling periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base.
Based on historical results, we generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the
first and fourth quarters. Softening of sales and increased churn in the second and third quarters
of the year usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions during these quarters.
44
Average Revenue Per User. ARPU represents (a) service revenues less activation revenues and
pass through charges for the measurement period, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly
number of customers during such period. ARPU was $40.42 and $42.77 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a decrease of $2.35. ARPU was $41.43 and $43.22 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, a decrease of $1.79. The decrease in
ARPU for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, when compared to the same periods in
2007, was primarily attributable to higher participation in our Family Plans as well as reduced
revenue from certain features now included in our service plans that were previously provided a la
carte.
Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA is determined by dividing (a) selling expenses plus the total
cost of equipment associated with transactions with new customers less activation revenues and
equipment revenues associated with transactions with new customers during the measurement period by
(b) gross customer additions during such period. Retail customer service expenses and equipment
margin on handsets sold to existing customers when they are identified, including handset upgrade
transactions, are excluded, as these costs are incurred specifically for existing customers. CPGA
costs decreased to $123.52 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $125.92 for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. CPGA costs increased to $126.35 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 from $118.99 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in CPGA
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same periods in 2007 was
primarily driven by a 39% increase in gross additions. The increase in CPGA for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same periods in 2007, was primarily driven by selling
expenses associated with the continued customer growth in our Expansion Markets including the
launch of service in the Los Angeles metropolitan area as well as our recent launches of service in
the Las Vegas metropolitan area in March 2008, the Jacksonville metropolitan area in April 2008 and
the Philadelphia metropolitan area in July 2008.
Cost Per User. CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding
applicable non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on handset equipment transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and
costs associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)), divided by the sum of the average monthly number of
customers during such period. CPU for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$18.18 and $17.81, respectively. CPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$18.41 and $18.11, respectively. We continue to achieve cost benefits due to the increasing scale
of our business. However, these benefits have been more than offset by a combination of
construction and launch expenses associated with our Expansion Markets, which contributed $4.04 and
$3.36 of additional CPU for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and
$3.79 and $3.12 of additional CPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Core Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Core Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Core Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,845,732 |
|
|
|
2,578,019 |
|
|
|
2,845,732 |
|
|
|
2,578,019 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
35,729 |
|
|
|
186,827 |
|
|
|
277,061 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
182,189 |
|
|
$ |
170,983 |
|
|
$ |
540,050 |
|
|
$ |
489,175 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a Percent of
Service Revenues |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
47.7 |
% |
|
|
48.3 |
% |
|
|
46.5 |
% |
As of September 30, 2008, our networks in our Core Markets cover a population of approximately
23 million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Core Markets were 30,379 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, compared to 35,729 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net customer
additions in our Core Markets were 186,827 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared
to 277,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Total customers were 2,845,732 as of September 30, 2008, an
increase of 10% over the customer total as of September 30, 2007 and 7% over the customer total as
of December 31, 2007. The increase in total customers is primarily attributable to the continued
demand for our service offerings.
45
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months
ended September 30, 2008, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $182.2 million compared to $171.0
million for the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Core Markets
Adjusted EBITDA was $540.1 million compared to $489.2 million for the same period in 2007. We
continue to experience increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a result of continued customer
growth and cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were
49.0% and 47.7%, respectively. Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 48.3% and 46.5%, respectively. Consistent
with the increase in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to experience corresponding
increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due to the growth in
service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core
Markets.
Expansion Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Expansion Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Expansion Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,001,582 |
|
|
|
1,086,199 |
|
|
|
2,001,582 |
|
|
|
1,086,199 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
218,886 |
|
|
|
78,573 |
|
|
|
697,701 |
|
|
|
446,171 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
18,699 |
|
|
$ |
13,516 |
|
|
$ |
48,819 |
|
|
$ |
25,088 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a Percent of Service
Revenues |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
As of September 30, 2008, our networks in our Expansion Markets cover a population of
approximately 38 million.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 218,886 for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, compared to 78,573 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net
customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 697,701 for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, compared to 446,171 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Total customers were
2,001,582 as of September 30, 2008, an increase of 84% over the customer total as of September 30,
2007 and an increase of approximately 54% over the customer total as of December 31, 2007. The
increase in total customers is primarily attributable to the continued demand for our service
offerings as well as the continued expansion of our service footprint in the Los Angeles
metropolitan area and our recent launches of service in the Las Vegas, Jacksonville and
Philadelphia metropolitan areas.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months
ended September 30, 2008, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $18.7 million compared to an
Adjusted EBITDA of $13.5 million for the same period in 2007. For the nine months ended September
30, 2008, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $48.8 million compared to an Adjusted EBITDA of
$25.1 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA, when compared to the
same period in the previous year, was attributable to cost benefits achieved due to the increasing
scale of our business, partially offset by construction and launch expenses associated primarily with the
launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan areas
and the build out of the New York and Boston metropolitan areas.
46
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Expansion Markets
Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 were 7.8% and 10.3%, respectively. The decrease in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a
percent of service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was due to the
construction and launch expenses associated primarily with the launch of service in the Los
Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan areas and the build out of the New
York and Boston metropolitan areas, partially offset by the growth in service revenues. Expansion
Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 were 7.5% and 7.0%, respectively. Consistent with the increase in Expansion Markets
Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we experienced a corresponding
increase in Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due to the growth in
service revenues as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the
Expansion Markets, partially offset by construction and launch expenses associated primarily with
the launch of service in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Jacksonville and Philadelphia metropolitan
areas and the build out of the New York and Boston metropolitan areas.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We utilize certain financial measures and key performance indicators that are not calculated
in accordance with GAAP to assess our financial and operating performance. A non-GAAP financial
measure is defined as a numerical measure of a companys financial performance that (i) excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included
in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of
income or statement of cash flows; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have
the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and
presented.
ARPU, CPGA, and CPU are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management to judge our
ability to meet our liquidity requirements and to evaluate our operating performance. We believe
these measures are important in understanding the performance of our operations from period to
period, and although every company in the wireless industry does not define each of these measures
in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures (which are common in the wireless
industry) facilitate key liquidity and operating performance comparisons with other companies in
the wireless industry. The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures with our
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
ARPU We utilize ARPU to evaluate our per-customer service revenue realization and to assist
in forecasting our future service revenues. ARPU is calculated exclusive of activation revenues,
as these amounts are a component of our costs of acquiring new customers and are included in our
calculation of CPGA. ARPU is also calculated exclusive of pass through charges that we collect
from our customers and remit to the appropriate government agencies.
Average number of customers for any measurement period is determined by dividing (a) the sum
of the average monthly number of customers for the measurement period by (b) the number of months
in such period. Average monthly number of customers for any month represents the sum of the number
of customers on the first day of the month and the last day of the month divided by two. The
following table shows the calculation of ARPU for the periods indicated.
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and ARPU) |
|
Calculation of Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
610,691 |
|
|
$ |
489,131 |
|
|
$ |
1,771,222 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,988 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation revenues |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(2,995 |
) |
|
|
(11,910 |
) |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
Pass through charges |
|
|
(31,445 |
) |
|
|
(25,215 |
) |
|
|
(88,582 |
) |
|
|
(71,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenues |
|
$ |
574,860 |
|
|
$ |
460,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,670,730 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,645 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,741,043 |
|
|
|
3,592,045 |
|
|
|
4,480,606 |
|
|
|
3,416,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU |
|
$ |
40.42 |
|
|
$ |
42.77 |
|
|
$ |
41.43 |
|
|
$ |
43.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA We utilize CPGA to assess the efficiency of our distribution strategy, validate the
initial capital invested in our customers and determine the number of months to recover our
customer acquisition costs. This measure also allows us to compare our average acquisition costs
per new customer to those of other wireless broadband PCS providers. Activation revenues and
equipment revenues related to new customers are deducted from selling expenses in this calculation
as they represent amounts paid by customers at the time their service is activated that reduce our
acquisition cost of those customers. Additionally, equipment costs associated with existing
customers, net of related revenues, are excluded as this measure is intended to reflect only the
acquisition costs related to new customers. The following table reconciles total costs used in the
calculation of CPGA to selling expenses, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure to CPGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except gross customer |
|
|
|
additions and CPGA) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per Gross Addition (CPGA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
$ |
58,916 |
|
|
$ |
35,625 |
|
|
$ |
158,743 |
|
|
$ |
99,096 |
|
Less: Activation revenues |
|
|
(4,386 |
) |
|
|
(2,995 |
) |
|
|
(11,910 |
) |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
Less: Equipment revenues |
|
|
(76,030 |
) |
|
|
(67,607 |
) |
|
|
(256,660 |
) |
|
|
(236,612 |
) |
Add: Equipment revenue not associated with new customers |
|
|
33,295 |
|
|
|
31,590 |
|
|
|
116,711 |
|
|
|
107,492 |
|
Add: Cost of equipment |
|
|
160,538 |
|
|
|
131,179 |
|
|
|
520,783 |
|
|
|
437,925 |
|
Less: Equipment costs not associated with new customers |
|
|
(56,891 |
) |
|
|
(43,254 |
) |
|
|
(188,096 |
) |
|
|
(142,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross addition expenses |
|
$ |
115,442 |
|
|
$ |
84,538 |
|
|
$ |
339,571 |
|
|
$ |
257,546 |
|
Divided by: Gross customer additions |
|
|
934,607 |
|
|
|
671,379 |
|
|
|
2,687,513 |
|
|
|
2,164,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
123.52 |
|
|
$ |
125.92 |
|
|
$ |
126.35 |
|
|
$ |
118.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding applicable
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on equipment transactions unrelated to initial customer
acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and costs
associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)) exclusive of pass through charges, divided by the sum
of the average monthly number of customers during such period. CPU does not include any
depreciation and amortization expense. Management uses CPU as a tool to evaluate the non-selling
cash expenses associated with ongoing business operations on a per customer basis, to track changes
in these non-selling cash costs over time, and to help evaluate how changes in our business
operations affect non-selling cash costs per customer. In addition, CPU provides management with a
useful measure to compare our non-selling cash costs per customer with those of other wireless
providers. We believe investors use CPU primarily as a tool to track changes in our non-selling
cash costs over time and to compare our non-selling cash costs to those of other wireless
providers, although other wireless carriers may calculate this measure differently. The following
table reconciles total costs used in the calculation of CPU to cost of service, which we consider
to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to CPU.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average number |
|
|
|
of customers and CPU) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per User (CPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service |
|
$ |
219,423 |
|
|
$ |
163,671 |
|
|
$ |
614,036 |
|
|
$ |
471,233 |
|
Add: General and administrative expense |
|
|
57,738 |
|
|
|
48,871 |
|
|
|
175,705 |
|
|
|
141,054 |
|
Add: Net loss on equipment
transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition |
|
|
23,596 |
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
71,385 |
|
|
|
34,726 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense
included in cost of service and
general and administrative expense |
|
|
(10,782 |
) |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
(30,254 |
) |
|
|
(18,971 |
) |
Less: Pass through charges |
|
|
(31,445 |
) |
|
|
(25,215 |
) |
|
|
(88,582 |
) |
|
|
(71,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs used in the calculation of CPU |
|
$ |
258,530 |
|
|
$ |
191,884 |
|
|
$ |
742,290 |
|
|
$ |
556,836 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
4,741,043 |
|
|
|
3,592,045 |
|
|
|
4,480,606 |
|
|
|
3,416,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.18 |
|
|
$ |
17.81 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
|
$ |
18.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash
generated from operations. At September 30, 2008, we had a total of approximately $1.0 billion in
cash and cash equivalents. Over the last year, the capital and credit markets have become
increasingly volatile as a result of adverse economic and financial conditions that have triggered
the failure and near failure of a number of large financial services companies and a possible
global recession. We believe that this increased volatility and global recession may make it
difficult to obtain additional financing or sell additional equity. We believe that, based on our
current level of cash and cash equivalents and anticipated cash flows from operations, the current
adverse economic and financial conditions in the credit and capital markets will not have a
material impact on our liquidity, cash flow, financial flexibility or our ability to fund our
operations in the near-term.
We have historically invested our substantial cash balances in, among other things, securities
issued and fully guaranteed by the United States or the states, highly rated commercial paper and
auction rate securities, money market funds meeting certain criteria, and demand deposits. These
investments are subject to credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk. At September 30,
2008, we had invested substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in money market funds
consisting of U.S. treasury securities.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we made an original investment of $133.9 million in
principal in certain auction rate securities, substantially all of which are secured by
collateralized debt obligations with a portion of the underlying collateral being mortgage
securities or related to mortgage securities. Consistent with our investment policy guidelines,
the auction rate securities investments held by us all had AAA/Aaa credit ratings at the time of
purchase. With the continued liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets,
the auction rate securities held by us at September 30, 2008 continue to experience failed auctions
as the amount of securities submitted for sale in the auctions exceeds the amount of purchase
orders. In addition, substantially all of the auction rate securities held by us have been
downgraded or placed on credit watch by at least one credit rating agency.
The estimated market value of our auction rate security holdings at September 30, 2008 was
approximately $16.8 million, which reflects a $117.1 million adjustment to the original principal
value of $133.9 million. The estimated market value at December 31, 2007 was approximately $36.1
million, which reflected a $97.8 million adjustment to the aggregate principal value at that date.
Although the auction rate securities continue to pay interest according to their stated terms,
based on statements received from our broker and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment
factors, we recorded an impairment charge of $3.0 million and $20.0 million during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, reflecting an additional portion of our auction
rate security holdings that we have concluded have an other-than-temporary decline in value. The
offsetting increase in fair value of approximately $0.7 million is reported in accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets.
Historically, given the liquidity created by auctions, our auction rate securities were
presented as current assets under short-term investments on our balance sheet. Given the failed
auctions, our auction rate securities are illiquid until there is a successful auction for them or
we sell them. Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining auction rate securities has been
reclassified from current to non-current assets and is presented in long-term investments on our
balance sheet as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The $117.8 million impairment
49
charges recorded to date do not have a material impact on our liquidity and are not included in our
approximately $1.0 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2008. We may incur additional
impairments to our auction rate securities which may be up to the full remaining value of such
auction rate securities. Management believes that any future additional impairment charges
including an impairment equal to the full purchase price of such auction rate securities will not
have a material effect on our liquidity.
Our strategy has been to offer our services in major metropolitan areas and their surrounding
areas, which we refer to as clusters. We are seeking opportunities to enhance our current market
clusters and to provide service in new geographic areas. From time to time, we may purchase
spectrum and related assets from third parties or the FCC. We participated as a bidder in FCC
Auction 66 and in November 2006 we were granted eight licenses for a total aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.4 billion. We participated as a bidder in Auction 73 and on June 26, 2008, we
were granted one 700 MHz License for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $313.3 million.
The 700 MHz License supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless spectrum previously granted to us
in the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result
of Auction 66.
As a result of the acquisition of spectrum licenses and the opportunities that these licenses
provide for us to expand our operations into major metropolitan markets, we will require
significant additional capital in the future to finance the construction and initial operating
costs associated with such licenses. We generally do not intend to commence the construction of
any individual license area until we have sufficient funds available to provide for the related
construction and operating costs associated with such license area. We currently plan to focus on
building out networks to cover approximately 40 million of total population during 2009-2010
including the launch of the Boston and New York metropolitan areas in early 2009. Our initial
launch dates will be accomplished in phases in the larger metropolitan areas. Our future builds
will entail a more extensive use of distributed antenna systems, or DAS, systems than we have
deployed in the past. This, along with other factors, could result in an increase in the total
capital expenditures per covered population to initially launch operations, however, we would not
expect the estimate of total cash expenditures to reach free cash flow positive to be materially
impacted. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and our anticipated cash flows from
operations will be sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
The construction of our network and the marketing and distribution of our wireless
communications products and services have required, and will continue to require, substantial
capital investment. Capital outlays have included license acquisition costs, capital expenditures
for construction of our network infrastructure, costs associated with clearing and relocating
non-governmental incumbent licenses, funding of operating cash flow losses incurred as we launch
services in new metropolitan areas and other working capital costs, debt service and financing fees
and expenses. Our capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2008 were approximately $660.8
million and aggregate capital expenditures for 2007 were approximately $767.7 million. These
expenditures were primarily associated with the construction of the network infrastructure in our
Expansion Markets and our efforts to increase the service area and capacity of our existing Core
Markets network through the addition of cell sites and switches. We believe the increased service
area and capacity in existing markets will improve our service offering, helping us to attract
additional customers and increase revenues. In addition, we believe our new Expansion Markets have
attractive demographics which will result in increased revenues.
As of September 30, 2008, we owed an aggregate of approximately $3.0 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and 91/4% senior notes. As of September 30, 2008, we owed approximately
$29.5 million under our capital lease obligations.
Our senior secured credit facility calculates consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as: consolidated
net income plus depreciation and amortization; gain (loss) on disposal of assets; non-cash
expenses; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; provision for income taxes; interest expense; and
certain expenses of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. minus interest and other income and non-cash
items increasing consolidated net income.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, to be an important indicator to investors
because it provides information related to our ability to provide cash flows to meet future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and fund future growth. We present
this discussion of Adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our senior secured credit facility contain
ratios based on this measure. Other wireless carriers may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently.
If our Adjusted EBITDA were to decline below certain levels, covenants in our senior secured credit
facility that are based on Adjusted EBITDA, including our maximum senior secured leverage ratio
covenant, may be violated and could cause, among other things, an inability to incur further
indebtedness and in certain circumstances a default or mandatory prepayment under our senior
secured credit facility. Our maximum senior secured leverage ratio is required to be less than 4.5
to 1.0 based on Adjusted EBITDA plus the impact of
50
certain new markets. The lenders under our senior secured credit facility use the senior
secured leverage ratio to measure our ability to meet our obligations on our senior secured debt by
comparing the total amount of such debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, which our lenders use to estimate
our cash flow from operations. The senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of
senior secured indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by our senior secured credit facility.
For the twelve months ended September 30, 2008, our senior secured leverage ratio was 1.94 to 1.0,
which means for every $1.00 of Adjusted EBITDA, we had $1.94 of senior secured indebtedness. In
addition, consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is also utilized, among other measures, to determine
managements compensation levels. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with
GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for, operating income, net income, or any other
measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA
should not be construed as an alternative to, or more meaningful than cash flows from operating
activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP.
The following table shows the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
our senior secured credit facility, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Calculation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
44,880 |
|
|
$ |
53,108 |
|
|
$ |
134,864 |
|
|
$ |
147,554 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
67,631 |
|
|
|
45,493 |
|
|
|
185,819 |
|
|
|
125,996 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (1) |
|
|
10,782 |
|
|
|
7,107 |
|
|
|
30,254 |
|
|
|
18,971 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
42,950 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
136,032 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary (1) |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
Impairment loss on investment securities |
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
15,007 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
|
96,873 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
200,888 |
|
|
$ |
184,499 |
|
|
$ |
588,869 |
|
|
$ |
514,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a non-cash expense, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. |
In addition, for further information, the following table reconciles consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, to cash flows from operating activities
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
196,489 |
|
|
$ |
173,141 |
|
|
$ |
527,907 |
|
|
$ |
440,450 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
42,950 |
|
|
|
54,574 |
|
|
|
136,032 |
|
|
|
152,718 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
(23,317 |
) |
|
|
(20,418 |
) |
|
|
(44,968 |
) |
(Provision for) recovery of uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
|
(14,268 |
) |
|
|
(6,582 |
) |
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
(1,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(3,603 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
33,512 |
|
|
|
96,873 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(33,690 |
) |
|
|
(33,100 |
) |
|
|
(93,484 |
) |
|
|
(95,257 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
(30,269 |
) |
|
|
(22,291 |
) |
|
|
(36,037 |
) |
|
|
(28,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
200,888 |
|
|
$ |
184,499 |
|
|
$ |
588,869 |
|
|
$ |
514,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities increased $87.4 million to $527.9 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $440.5 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in earnings as a result of the growth
experienced over the last twelve months, as well as an increase in working capital during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $991.2 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to $392.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase
was due primarily to $314.6 million in purchases of FCC licenses, $25.2 million in cash used for
business acquisitions, $135.1 million increase in purchases of property and equipment which was
primarily related to construction in the Expansion Markets, and $143.0 million in net proceeds from
the sale of investments during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 that did not recur during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $13.5 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to $1.3 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease
was due primarily to $818.2 million in net proceeds from the Companys initial public offering that
was completed in April 2007 and $420.5 million in net proceeds from the issuance of the additional
notes in June 2007 that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Capital Lease Obligations
We have entered into various non-cancelable DAS capital lease agreements, with expirations
through 2023, covering dedicated optical fiber. Assets and future obligations related to capital
leases are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet in property and equipment and
long-term debt, respectively. Depreciation of assets held under capital lease obligations is
included in depreciation and amortization expense.
Capital Expenditures and Other Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
Capital Expenditures. We and Royal Street currently expect to incur capital expenditures in
the range of $1.1 billion to $1.3 billion for the year ending December 31, 2008 in our Core and
Expansion Markets. In addition, we have spent $313.3 million for the purchase of 700 MHz spectrum
in Auction 73 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we and Royal Street incurred $660.8 million
in capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and
improvement of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of
the Boston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia Expansion Markets.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we and Royal Street incurred $767.7 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Los
Angeles metropolitan area, which was launched in September 2007.
Other Acquisitions and Dispositions. On December 21, 2007, we executed an agreement with PTA
Communications, Inc., or PTA, to purchase 10 MHz of PCS spectrum from PTA for the basic trading
area of Jacksonville, Florida. We also entered into agreements with NTCH, Inc. (dba Cleartalk PCS)
and PTA-FLA, Inc. for the purchase of certain of their assets used in providing PCS wireless
telecommunications services in the Jacksonville market. On January 17, 2008, we closed on the
acquisition of certain assets used in providing PCS wireless services. We paid a total of $18.6
million in cash for these assets, exclusive of transaction costs. On May 13, 2008, we closed on
the purchase of the 10 MHz of spectrum from PTA for the basic trading area of Jacksonville, Florida
for consideration of $6.5 million in cash.
52
We participated as a bidder in Auction 73 and on June 26, 2008, we were granted one 700 MHz
License for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $313.3 million. The 700 MHz License
supplements the 10 MHz of advanced wireless spectrum previously granted to us in the
Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont Economic Area as a result of
Auction 66.
On September 29, 2008, we entered into a spectrum exchange agreement covering licenses in
certain markets with Leap Wireless International, Inc. (Leap Wireless). Leap Wireless will
acquire an additional 10 MHz of spectrum in San Diego and Fresno, California; Seattle, Washington
and certain other Washington and Oregon markets, and we will acquire an additional 10 MHz of
spectrum in Shreveport-Bossier City, Louisiana; Lakeland-Winter Haven, Florida; and Dallas-Ft.
Worth, Texas and certain other North Texas markets. Completion of the spectrum exchange is subject
to customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
On various dates in 2008, we entered into agreements for the acquisition of spectrum from
third parties in the aggregate amount of approximately $15.5 million. Consummation of these
acquisitions is conditioned upon customary closing conditions, including approval by the FCC.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We believe that inflation has not materially affected our operations.
Effect of New Accounting Standards
We believe that the adoption of new accounting standards has not materially affected our
results of operations. For further discussion see Note 19 to the financial statements included in
this report.
Fair Value Measurements
We do not expect changes in the aggregate fair value of our financial assets and liabilities
to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 10 to the
financial statements included in this report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates,
including interest rates. We do not routinely enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading, speculative or hedging purposes, unless it is hedging interest rate risk
exposure or is required by our senior secured credit facility. We do not currently conduct
business internationally, so we are generally not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $1.6 billion in outstanding indebtedness under
our senior secured credit facility that bears interest at floating rates based on the London Inter
Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding debt under our
senior secured credit facility as of September 30, 2008 was 6.575%. On November 21, 2006, to
manage our interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of our senior secured credit
facility, we entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement. This agreement covers a
notional amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to
fixed-rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on
February 1, 2007. The interest rate swap agreement expires in 2010. On April 30, 2008, to manage
our interest rate risk exposure, we entered into a two-year interest rate protection agreement.
The agreement was effective on June 30, 2008, covers a notional amount of $500 million and
effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to fixed rate debt at an annual rate of
5.46%. The monthly interest settlement periods began on June 30, 2008. The interest rate
protection agreement expires on June 30, 2010. If market LIBOR rates increase 100 basis points over the
rates in effect at September 30, 2008, annual interest expense on the approximately $68.0 million
in variable rate debt would increase approximately $0.7 million.
53
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported as required by the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for appropriate and timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with participation by our CEO and CFO,
has designed the Companys disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving these desired objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we conducted an evaluation,
with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this
report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is
necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and objectives. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2008 in timely making known to
them material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed
in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
54
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against MetroPCS in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June 16, 2006,
for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services
and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, held by Leap, or the 497 Leap
Litigation. The complaint sought both injunctive relief and monetary damages, including treble
damages and attorneys fees, for our alleged willful infringement by our wireless communication
systems and associated services of the 497 Patent. We answered the complaint, raised a number of
affirmative defenses, and together with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and
several related entities and certain current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. In
our counterclaims, we claimed that we do not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497
Patent and we asserted claims for constructive trust, misappropriation, conversion and disclosure
of trade secrets, misappropriation of confidential information, breach of a confidential
relationship, and fraud. Our counterclaims sought monetary and exemplary damages, and injunctive
relief.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street Communications filed a separate action in the United
States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No.
8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM, seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent was invalid and that
Royal Street Communications did not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of the 497 Patent. The
Court entered an Order transferring the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-00285-TJW. In February 2008, Leap
answered the complaint and counterclaimed against Royal Street Communications, alleging that Royal
Street Communications willfully infringed the 497 Patent and seeking both injunctive relief and
monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys fees, for Royal Street Communications
alleged willful infringement by its wireless communication systems and associated services of the
497 Patent.
On August 15, 2006, we filed an action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus County,
Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets,
interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective business
advantage, and trespass. In this action we sought monetary and punitive damages and injunctive
relief. We amended our complaint in response to demurrers and motions filed by Leap and Orders of
the Court. On September 22, 2008, the Defendants were ordered by the Court to answer our complaint.
On September 26, 2008, Leap, Royal Street, we and the other defendants in the above three
actions settled the above actions and released all claims against the other parties related to the
above actions. The parties filed motions with the respective Courts dismissing the respective
actions with prejudice, which the respective Courts have granted.
We also tendered the 497 Leap Litigation to the manufacturer of our network infrastructure
equipment, Alcatel Lucent, for indemnity and defense. Alcatel Lucent declined to indemnify and
defend us. We filed a petition in state district court in Harrison County, Texas, Cause No.
07-0710, for a declaratory ruling that Alcatel Lucent is obligated to cooperate, indemnify, defend
and hold us harmless from the 497 Leap Litigation and for specific performance, for injunctive
relief and for breach of contract. Alcatel Lucent responded to our petition and requested that the
Court dismiss, abate, stay, and deny every claim in our petition asserted against Alcatel Lucent
and order us to amend our petition. We responded to Alcatel Lucents request. After the settlement
with Leap, on September 29, 2008, we filed a Notice of Nonsuit to dismiss this action without
prejudice, and on, October 1, 2008, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice.
In addition, we are involved in other litigation from time to time, including litigation
regarding intellectual property claims that we consider to be in the normal course of business. We
are not currently party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would, individually
or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, or liquidity.
55
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC
on February 29, 2008, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed
with the SEC on May 9, 2008, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 filed with the SEC on August 8, 2008, other than the changes and additions to the Risk
Factors set forth below.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
We may face additional competition from new entrants in the wireless marketplace which could
adversely affect our operating results and hinder our ability to grow. |
The FCC is taking steps to make additional spectrum available for wireless services in each of
our metropolitan areas. Any auction and licensing of new spectrum may result in new competitors
and/or allow existing competitors to acquire additional spectrum, which could allow them to offer
services that we may not be able to offer with the licenses we hold or to which we have access due
to technological or economic constraints. The FCC already has allocated an additional 62 MHz of
spectrum in the 700 MHz band which may be used to offer services competitive with the services we
offer or plan to offer and another 40 MHz of spectrum has already been allocated for AWS.
Recently, the FCC adopted rules that will allow the use of unused digital television channels on an
unlicensed basis, which may allow third parties to offer services competitive with the services we
offer or plan to offer. In the future, our competitors may be able to use certain FCC programs,
such as the FCCs designated entity program or the proposed nationwide interoperable networks for
public safety use, to purchase or acquire spectrum at materially lower prices than what we are
required to pay, including at no cost. In addition, energy companies and utility companies are also
expanding their services to offer communications and broadband services. This additional
competition may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating
results.
|
|
We may be unable to obtain the roaming and other services we need from other carriers to remain
competitive. |
Many of our competitors have regional or national networks which enable them to offer
automatic roaming and long distance telephone services to their subscribers at a lower cost than we
can offer and allow them to offer unlimited fixed-rate roaming plans on their existing networks
over a larger area than we can offer. We do not have a national network, and we must pay fees to
other carriers who provide roaming services and who carry long distance calls made by our
subscribers. We currently have roaming agreements with several other carriers which allow our
customers to roam on those carriers network. The roaming agreements, however, do not cover all
geographic areas where our customers may seek service when they travel, generally cover voice but
not data services, and at least one such agreement may be terminated on relatively short notice. As
the wireless industry has consolidated, and may continue to consolidate in the future, we may have
increased difficulty entering into new roaming agreements with other carriers or replacing our
existing roaming agreements. Two carriers from whom we currently receive roaming services have
received the consent of the FCC to merge with one another and, as a result, our existing roaming
arrangements are likely to be adversely affected in the future which may lead to us having to pay
higher roaming rates in the future. In addition, we believe the rates we are charged by certain
carriers in some instances are higher than the rates they charge to other roaming partners.
Further, many of the wireless carriers against whom we compete have service area footprints
substantially larger than our footprint and some have substantially more spectrum. Certain of our
competitors also are able to offer their customers roaming services over larger geographic areas
and at lower rates than we can offer. Our ability to replicate these roaming service offerings at
rates which will make us, or allow us to be, competitive is uncertain at this time. The FCC
recently clarified that CMRS providers must offer automatic roaming services on just, reasonable
and non-discriminatory terms, but found that a CMRS provider is not required to offer roaming
services in any geographic area for which a requesting carrier holds a license or a spectrum lease,
even if the requesting carrier has not yet built its system, for roaming services that are
classified as information services (such as high speed wireless Internet access services), or for
roaming services that are not classified as CMRS (such as non-interconnected services). If we are
unable to enter into or maintain roaming agreements for roaming services that our customers want at
reasonable rates, including in areas where we have licenses or lease spectrum but have not
constructed facilities, we may be unable to compete effectively, may lose customers and revenues,
or may not be able to increase our customer base. We also may be unable to continue to receive
roaming services in areas in which we hold licenses or lease spectrum after the expiration or
termination
56
of our existing roaming agreements. We also may be obligated to allow customers of other
technically compatible carriers to roam automatically on our systems, which may enhance their
ability to compete with us. We also have no assurance that the rates we will be charged for
automatic roaming will be reasonable as the FCC did not establish a default rate. If these risks
occur, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results.
|
|
An economic slowdown or recession in the United States may slow our growth and could limit our
ability to pursue new opportunities, to engage in acquisitions, or to purchase additional spectrum. |
The United States economy has recently deteriorated significantly and may be depressed for the
foreseeable future. A significant portion of our subscribers are in the lower half of the average
income in the metropolitan areas we serve and may be disproportionately affected by any disruption
in the United States economy, including an economic downturn or recession. In addition, a number
of our subscribers work in industries which may be disproportionately affected by an economic
slowdown or recession. The resulting impact of such economic conditions on consumer spending could
have a material adverse effect on demand for our services and on our business, financial condition
and operating results.
Additionally, our Senior Secured Credit Facility includes a $100 million revolving line of
credit that is to be funded by a number of commercial and investment banks. The deteriorating
worldwide economic conditions and tightening capital markets may effect whether our lenders are
able to honor their commitments to fund our revolving line of credit should we need to draw on such
line of credit to pursue new opportunities, engage in acquisitions, or purchase additional
spectrum. Further, with the resulting lack of access to bank financing and equity markets and other
sources of funds due to current economic conditions, should we need to access the market for
additional funds, we may not be able to obtain such additional funds and, if we were able to obtain
such funds, it may not be on terms and conditions acceptable to us, which could also limit or
preclude our ability to pursue new opportunities, engage in acquisitions, or purchase additional
spectrum.
|
|
We are exposed to counterparty risk in our Senior Secured Credit Facility and related interest
rate protection agreements, which could increase the amount of interest we pay on our long-term
debt. |
We have entered into interest rate protection agreements to manage the Companys interest rate
risk exposure by fixing the interest expense we pay on our long-term debt under our Senior Secured
Credit Facility. There is considerable turmoil in the world economy and banking markets which
could effect whether the counterparties to such interest rate protection agreements are able to
honor their agreements. If the counterparties fail to honor their commitments, we could experience
higher interest rates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results. In addition, if the counterparties fail to honor their
commitments, we also may be required replace such interest rate protection agreement with a new
interest rate protection agreement in an amount equal to that portion of our long-term debt under
our Senior Secured Credit Facility and Indenture which is not fixed and which is less than 50% of
our total long-term debt under our Senior Secured Credit Facility and Indenture, and such
replacement interest rate protection agreement may be at higher rates than our current interest
rate protection agreements. Further, if we are unable to enter into new interest rate protection
agreements, the lenders may claim we are in default under the terms of our Senior Secured Credit
Facility, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
operating results.
|
|
Our billing vendor has publicly announced that it plans to leave the telecommunications
services business, including the billing services business. |
Verisign, the vendor for our existing billing system, has publicly announced that it plans to
leave the telecommunications services business, including the billing services business. We have a
contract with Verisign that will allow us to continue to receive billing services on a
month-to-month basis at least through mid-year 2009; however, Verisign has recently notified us
that it does not plan to renew our existing agreement for the provision of billing services in
connection with our BREW, roaming services and incidental long distance services which will
terminate in early 2009. We recently entered into an agreement with a new billing provider to
replace the billing services we are currently receiving from Verisign. The new billing provider is
in the process of implementing the new billing services. If Verisign fails to continue to provide
the services it has previously provided prior to our transition to a third party system, if
Verisign fails to continue to upgrade its software and systems as we grow and
57
change our business, or if Verisign does not cooperate in our transition to our new billing
services provider, or if we are unable to transition our billing services to the new billing
services provider in a timely manner and before Verisign ceases to provide such billing services,
we may not be able to bill our customers, provide customer care, grow our business, report
financial results, or manage our business and we may have increased churn, all of which could have
a material and adverse effect on our business and financial and operating results.
|
|
We rely on third-parties to provide equipment, software and services that are integral to our
business and any significant disruption in our relationship could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, or operating results. |
Sophisticated financial, management, information and billing systems are vital to our ability
to monitor and control costs, bill customers, process customer orders, provide customer service,
produce reliable and accurate financial reports, and achieve operating efficiencies. We currently
rely on internal systems and third-party vendors to develop and to provide all of our significant
information, financial, and processing systems. We have entered into agreements with third-party
suppliers to provide equipment, software and services that are integral to our business, such as
customer care, financial reporting, billing and payment processing. We purchase a substantial
portion of this equipment and services from only a few major suppliers and we generally rely on one
key vendor. Some of these agreements may be terminated upon relatively short notice. In addition,
our plans for developing and implementing our financial information and billing systems rely to
some extent on the design, development and delivery of products and services by third-party
vendors. Our right to use these systems is dependent on license agreements with third-party vendors
and these systems may not perform as anticipated.
If our suppliers terminate their agreement with us, experience interruptions or other problems
delivering products or services to us on a timely basis or at all, it may cause us to have
difficulty providing services to or billing our customers, developing and deploying new services
and/or upgrading, maintaining, improving our networks, or generating accurate or timely financial
reports and information. If alternative suppliers and vendors become necessary, we may not be able
to obtain satisfactory and timely replacement services on economically attractive terms, or at all.
The loss, termination or expiration of these agreements or our inability to renew them at all or on
favorable terms or negotiate agreements with other providers at comparable rates could harm our
business. Our reliance on others to provide essential services on our behalf also gives us less
control over the efficiency, timeliness and quality of these services.
Additionally, our business model utilizes and relies upon indirect distribution outlets
including a range of local, regional and national mass market dealers and retailers allowing us to
reach the largest number of potential customers in our markets at a relatively low cost. Many of
our dealers own and operate more than one location and may operate in more than one of our
metropolitan areas. Many of these dealers also accept payment for our services on our behalf. With
the recent deterioration of the United States economy and the credit markets which may continue for
the foreseeable future, some of our dealers and vendors may be unable to continue their operations
or secure funds for their continued operations. Further, due to the present economic conditions, we
may be unable to find participants in our local markets that would qualify or be able to open a
dealer location to replace closed operations. Since we rely on such third parties to provide some
of our services, any bankruptcy, termination, switch or disruption in service by such third parties
could be costly and affect operating efficiencies which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
|
|
We may incur higher than anticipated intercarrier compensation costs, which could increase our
costs and reduce our profit margin. |
When our customers use our service to call customers of other carriers, in certain
circumstances we are required to pay the carrier that serves the called party, and any intermediary
or transit carrier, for the use of their networks. An ongoing FCC rulemaking proceeding is
examining whether a unified intercarrier compensation regime should be established for all traffic
exchanged between all carriers, including CMRS carriers such as us. In the course of that
proceeding, the FCC may adopt new intercarrier compensation rules which could lead to significant
changes in what we are obligated to pay for terminating local and long distance calls on other
carriers networks and the revenues we receive for terminating the calls of other carriers on our
network. These changes may be phased in over a number of years and the relief afforded to us by
such rule changes may occur on a different time frame than the burdens imposed on us, including
increased costs as a result of these new rules. In some instances, the proposed changes may reduce
our costs, and in other instances the proposed changes may increase our costs. The likely net
effect of these proposals cannot be determined at this time because the proposals are still under
consideration and remain subject to
58
change. Further, the proposals are ambiguous in some respects and the manner in which
carriers might respond to them is unknown. Additionally, state regulatory proceedings of uncertain
outcome may need to be undertaken to implement these rules. Finally, any adopted rules are likely
to be challenged, which could affect their impact on us. New intercarrier compensation rules, if
adopted, may result in increases in the charges we are required to pay other carriers for
terminating calls on their networks, increase the costs of or difficulty in negotiating new
agreements with carriers, and decrease the amount of revenue we receive for terminating calls from
other carriers on our network. Such changes may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and operating results.
In 2001, the FCC issued an order, or ISP Remand Order, pertaining to traffic bound for
Internet service providers, or ISPs. The ISP Remand Order held that originating carriers would
only be obligated to pay an interim compensation rate, or ISP Remand Rate, for ISP-bound traffic
terminated on the networks of other carriers. In order to receive the benefit of the ISP Remand
Rate for ISP-bound traffic, incumbent local exchange carriers, or ILECs, were required to allow all
telecommunications services traffic that was not interstate, intrastate access, information access
or exchange services, or local traffic, to be terminated on their networks for the same ISP Remand
Rate. This requirement is known as the mirroring rule. In many cases, the mirroring rule
resulted in us paying significantly lower rates for the exchange of traffic with the ILECs, thereby
lowering our intercarrier compensation costs. In 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit issued a decision overturning and remanding to the FCC the ISP Remand Order,
but the Court left in place the ISP Remand Rate and the mirroring rule. As a result, most of our
local traffic continued to be exchanged with ILECs at the ISP Remand Rate. Recently, the Court
issued an order, or Mandamus Order, directing the FCC to respond to its prior remand by November 5,
2008 with a final, appealable order providing legal authority for the FCCs ISP Remand Rate. On November 5, 2008, the FCC issued an order responding to the Courts Mandamus Order and
provided a legal basis for its prior actions. Certain parties have indicated their
intention to challenge the new order. If the Court concludes that the FCCs order is not
sufficient, the Court may remand and vacate the FCCs the ISP Remand Rate or the related rules. If
the Court did so, the ILECs may try to raise the rates of traffic exchanged with the ILECs. If
these efforts are successful, the change in rates may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and operating results.
The FCC also previously determined that certain unilaterally imposed termination charges
imposed pursuant to a state tariff prior to April 2005 may be appropriate. Some carriers that may
not be covered by the FCC decision have claimed a unilateral right to impose charges on us that we
consider or may consider to be unreasonably high and have threatened to pursue or have initiated or
may initiate claims against us for termination payments. The outcome of these claims is uncertain.
A determination that we are liable for additional terminating compensation payments could subject
us to additional claims by other carriers. Further, legal restrictions may inhibit our ability or
willingness to block traffic to telecommunication carriers who may request unreasonable payment. In
addition, certain transit carriers have taken the position that they can charge market rates for
transit services, which may in some instances be significantly higher than our current rates or the
rates we are willing to pay. We may be obligated to pay these higher rates and/or purchase services
from others or engage in direct connection, which may result in higher costs which could materially
affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
|
|
A ruling of the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress may have an adverse effect on our
distribution strategy. |
Many carriers, including us, routinely place software locks on wireless handsets, which
prevent a customer from using a wireless handset sold by one carrier on another carriers system.
In 2006, the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress, or Copyright Office, determined that a
person could circumvent such software locks and other firmware that enable wireless handsets to
connect to a wireless telephone network when such circumvention is accomplished for the sole
purpose of lawfully connecting the wireless handset to another wireless telephone network. The
determination by the Copyright Office expires in October 2009 and the Copyright Office may not
extend such determination. The determination may allow customers who are dissatisfied with their
service to utilize the services of our competitors or us without having to purchase a new handset.
The ability of our customers to leave our service and use their wireless handsets on other
carriers networks may have an adverse material impact on our business. In addition, since we
provide a subsidy for handsets to our distribution partners that are incurred in advance, we may
experience higher distribution costs resulting from wireless handsets not being activated or
maintained on our network, which costs may be material. We have implemented a flashing service
which allows new customers to unlock their phones which enables them to
59
connect their existing
handsets to our network. A carrier has alleged that our flashing program infringes and dilutes their trademarks and
servicemarks and that we are inducing the breach of agreements with their customers. If a
significant number of new customers are attracted to our service as a result of this flashing
service and we are unable to continue such service, it could adversely affect our ability to
continue to attract new customers to our service, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and operating results.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
The FCC may adopt technical rules in connection with the allocation of spectrum which may
cause harmful interference to our existing
networks.
The FCC recently proposed to allocate 20 or 25 MHz of spectrum for a nationwide broadband
network operating in spectrum adjacent to the existing allocated and licensed AWS spectrum. The
FCC also has proposed service rules for 10 MHz of spectrum for AWS services operating in spectrum
adjacent to the existing PCS spectrum. The technical rules proposed by the FCC for these blocks of
spectrum may result in interference to our existing and planned PCS and AWS networks which could
cause our customers to experience dropped calls and degraded call quality while using our system.
With the exception of the Boston-Worcester, Massachusetts/New Hampshire/Rhode Island/Vermont
Economic Area, we are licensed for or have access to only AWS and PCS spectrum in our metropolitan
areas and therefore we would be unable to use other frequency bands to avoid any such interference.
If our customers as a result of interference experience a significant increase in dropped calls or
significantly degraded service, we could experience higher churn and we may have difficulty adding
additional customers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, our financial condition
and operating results. In addition, the interference may cause our networks to have reduced
capacity which may require us to add additional cell sites or DAS nodes and spend additional
capital, which may be material.
Spectrum for which we have been granted licenses as a result of Auction 66 and Auction 73 is
subject to certain legal challenges, which
may ultimately result in the FCC revoking our licenses.
We were required by the applicable FCC rules to pay the full purchase price of approximately
$1.4 billion and $313.3 million to the FCC for the licenses we were granted as a result of Auction
66 and Auction 73, respectively, even though there are ongoing challenges to some aspects of the
final auction rules as they relate to DE participation in the auctions. Several interested parties
are appealing these rules in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the U.S Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and seeking, among other relief, to overturn the
results of Auction 66 and Auction 73. We are unable at this time to predict the likely outcome of
these challenges. If the courts invalidate either auction, we could lose the licenses granted to us
as a result of the auctions, including the Auction 66 Market licenses and the license granted in
Auction 73, and would have no assurance of being able to reacquire the licenses in a subsequent
re-auction. While we would likely receive a refund of the payments made to the FCC for the
spectrum should either auction be overturned, we would not be reimbursed for time, money and
efforts spent to clear the spectrum, expenses incurred to build systems operating on the spectrum,
or the interest expenses incurred by us prior to the refund. In addition, there could be a delay
in us receiving a refund of our payments until the appeal is final. If the results of either
auction were overturned and we receive a refund, the delay in the return of our money, the interest
we would have incurred without reimbursement, the loss of any amounts spent to develop the licenses
in the interim, and the loss of the ability to provide service in the metropolitan areas covered by
such licenses, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating
results.
60
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Managed Services Agreement, entered into on September 15, 2008 and effective as of April 8, 2008,
by and between MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. and Amdocs Software Systems Limited and Amdocs, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
|
| | Portions of this Exhibit have been
omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of an application for confidential treatment.
|
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 10, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 10, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
62
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Managed Services Agreement, entered into on September 15, 2008 and effective as of April 8, 2008,
by and between MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. and Amdocs Software Systems Limited and Amdocs, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
|
| | Portions of this Exhibit have been
omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of an application for confidential treatment.
|
63