def14a
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO.
)
Filed by the Registrant
x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
x Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o Soliciting
Material under Rule 14a-12
|
PACCAR INC
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
x |
No fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which
transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of
transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
March 12, 2009
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of PACCAR Inc, which will be held at the
Meydenbauer Center, 11100 N.E. 6th Street, Bellevue,
Washington, at 10:30 a.m. on April 28, 2009.
The principal business of the Annual Meeting is stated on the
attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will also
provide an update on the Companys activities. The Board of
Directors recommends a vote FOR Item 1 and
AGAINST Items 2 and 3.
Your VOTE is important. Whether or not you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your proxy either by
mail, telephone or over the Internet.
Sincerely,
Mark C. Pigott
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PACCAR Inc will be held at
10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 28, 2009, at the
Meydenbauer Center, 11100 N.E. 6th Street, Bellevue,
Washington, for these purposes:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
To elect as directors the four Class II nominees named in
the attached proxy statement to serve three-year terms ending in
2012.
|
|
|
2.
|
To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding the annual election
of all directors.
|
|
|
3.
|
To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding a director vote
threshold; and
|
|
|
4.
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
|
Stockholders entitled to vote at this meeting are those of
record as of the close of business on
March 2, 2009.
IMPORTANT: The vote of each stockholder is important
regardless of the number of shares held. Whether or not you plan
to attend the meeting, please complete and return your proxy
form.
Directions to the Meydenbauer Center can be found on the back
cover of the attached Proxy Statement.
By order of the Board of Directors
J. M. DAmato
Secretary
Bellevue, Washington
March 12, 2009
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
PROXY
STATEMENT
The Board of Directors of PACCAR Inc issues this proxy statement
to solicit proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
at 10:30 a.m. on April 28, 2009, at the Meydenbauer
Center in Bellevue, Washington. This proxy statement includes
information about the business matters that will be voted upon
at the meeting. The proxy statement and proxy form were first
sent to stockholders on or about March 12, 2009.
GENERAL
INFORMATION
Voting
Rights
Stockholders eligible to vote at the meeting are those
identified as owners at the close of business on the record
date, March 2, 2009. Each outstanding share of common stock
is entitled to one vote on all items presented at the meeting.
At the close of business on March 2, 2009, the Company had
363,167,129 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote.
Stockholders may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy.
Execution of a proxy does not affect the right of a stockholder
to attend the meeting. The Board recommends that stockholders
exercise their right to vote by promptly completing and
returning the proxy form either by mail, telephone or the
Internet.
Voting by
Proxy
Mark C. Pigott and John M. Fluke, Jr., are designated proxy
holders to vote shares on behalf of stockholders at the 2009
Annual Meeting. The proxy holders are authorized to:
|
|
|
|
|
vote shares as instructed by the stockholders who have properly
completed and returned the proxy form;
|
|
|
|
vote shares as recommended by the Board when stockholders have
executed and returned the proxy form, but have given no
instructions; and
|
|
|
|
vote shares at their discretion on any matter not identified in
the proxy form that is properly brought before the Annual
Meeting.
|
The Trustee for the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (the SIP)
votes shares held in the SIP according to each members
instructions on the proxy form. If the proxy form is not
returned or is returned without voting instructions, the Trustee
will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares for
which it has received timely voting instructions, as provided in
the SIP.
Proxy
Voting Procedures
The proxy form allows registered stockholders to vote in one of
three ways:
Mail. Stockholders may complete, sign, date
and return the proxy form in the pre-addressed, postage-paid
envelope provided.
Telephone. Stockholders may call the toll-free
number listed on the proxy form and follow the voting
instructions given.
Internet. Stockholders may access the Internet
address listed on the proxy form and follow the voting
instructions given.
Telephone and Internet voting procedures authenticate each
stockholder by using a control number. The voting procedures
will confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
Stockholders who vote by telephone or Internet should not return
the proxy form.
1
Stockholders who hold shares through a broker or agent should
follow the voting instructions received from that broker or
agent.
Revoking Proxy Voting Instructions. A proxy
may be revoked by a later-dated proxy or by written notice to
the Secretary of the Company at any time before it is voted.
Stockholders who hold shares through a broker should contact the
broker or other agent if they wish to change their vote after
executing the proxy.
Online
Availability of Annual Meeting Materials
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held at
10:30 a.m. on April 28, 2009, at Meydenbauer Center,
Bellevue, Washington. The 2009 proxy statement and the 2008
Annual Report to stockholders are available on the
Companys Website at
www.paccar.com/2009annualmeeting/.
Stockholders who hold shares in a bank or brokerage account who
previously elected to receive the annual meeting materials
electronically and now wish to change their election and receive
paper copies may contact their bank or broker to change their
election.
Stockholders who receive annual meeting materials electronically
will receive a notice when the proxy materials become available
with instructions on how to access them over the Internet.
Multiple
Stockholders Sharing the Same Address
Registered stockholders at a shared address who would like to
discontinue receipt of multiple copies of the annual report and
proxy statement in the future should contact Wells Fargo
Shareowner Services at 1.877.602.7615 or
P.O. Box 64854, St. Paul, Minnesota
55164-0854.
Street name stockholders at a shared address who would like to
discontinue receipt of multiple copies of the annual report and
proxy statement in the future should contact their bank or
broker.
Some street name stockholders elected to receive one copy of the
2008 Annual Report and 2009 Proxy Statement at a shared address
prior to the 2009 Annual Meeting. If those stockholders now wish
to change that election, they may do so by contacting their
bank, broker, or PACCAR at 425.468.7520 or
P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009.
Vote
Required and Method of Counting Votes
The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by duly
authorized proxy, of a majority of all the stock issued and
outstanding and having voting power shall constitute a quorum
for the transaction of business.
|
|
Item 1:
|
Election
of Directors
|
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast for the
election of directors. If a stockholder does not vote for the
election of directors because the authority to vote is withheld,
because the proxy is not returned, because the broker holding
the shares does not vote or because of some other reason, the
shares will not count in determining the total number of votes
for each nominee. The Companys Certificate of
Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting. Proxies
signed and returned unmarked will be voted FOR the
nominees for Class II Director.
If any nominee is unable to act as director because of an
unexpected occurrence, the proxy holders may vote the proxies
for another person or the Board of Directors may reduce the
number of directors to be elected.
Items 2
and 3: Stockholder Proposals
To be approved, each item must receive the affirmative vote of a
majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to
vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will count as a vote
against each item. Broker nonvotes do not affect the voting
calculations. Proxies that are signed and returned unmarked will
be voted AGAINST Items 2 and 3.
2
STOCK
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following persons are known to the Company to be the
beneficial owners of more than five percent of the
Companys common stock as of December 31, 2008
(amounts shown are rounded to whole shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent
|
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
of Class
|
|
James C. Pigott
|
|
|
18,384,751
|
(a)
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
1405 42nd
Avenue East
Seattle, WA 98112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Ellen Hughes
|
|
|
25,342,282
|
(b)
|
|
|
6.99
|
|
701 5th
Avenue, Suite 5500
Seattle, WA 98104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 10,838,696 shares over which he has sole voting
power and 10,906,553 shares over which he has sole
investment power. He has shared voting power over
7,471,539 shares held by charitable trusts of which he is a
co-trustee and shares investment power over 7,400,478 of those
shares. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes 17,803,477 shares over which she has sole voting
and investment power, 138,327 shares over which she has
shared voting and investment power and the same
7,400,478 shares referenced in note (a) held by a
charitable trust of which she is a co-trustee and shares voting
and investment power. |
STOCK
OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following list shows the shares of common stock beneficially
owned by (1) each director and director nominee,
(2) the Chief Executive Officer and the other four most
highly compensated executive officers (collectively the
Named Executive Officers), and (3) by all
directors and executive officers as a group as of March 2,
2009 (amounts shown are rounded to whole share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent
|
Name
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
of Class
|
|
James G. Cardillo
|
|
|
202,356
|
(a)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Alison J. Carnwath
|
|
|
10,069
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John M. Fluke, Jr.
|
|
|
28,903
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kirk S. Hachigian
|
|
|
3,658
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephen F. Page
|
|
|
27,733
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert T. Parry
|
|
|
11,767
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
James C. Pigott
|
|
|
18,387,666
|
(c)(d)
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
John M. Pigott
|
|
|
2,290,311
|
(d)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark C. Pigott
|
|
|
6,238,281
|
(d)(e)
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
Thomas E. Plimpton
|
|
|
359,563
|
(a)
|
|
|
*
|
|
William G. Reed, Jr
|
|
|
682,518
|
(b)(d)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Daniel D. Sobic
|
|
|
81,094
|
(a)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gregory M. E. Spierkel
|
|
|
4,385
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Warren R. Staley
|
|
|
3,656
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael A. Tembreull
|
|
|
582,525
|
(a)(f)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Charles R. Williamson
|
|
|
16,539
|
(b)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Total of all directors and executive officers as a group
(21 individuals)
|
|
|
29,188,997
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
|
*Does not exceed one percent.
3
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes shares allocated in the Companys SIP for which
the participant has sole voting and investment power as follows:
J. G. Cardillo 34,507; T. E. Plimpton 44,454; D. D. Sobic
20,858; M.A. Tembreull 89,748. Includes restricted shares for
which the participant has voting power as follows: J. G.
Cardillo 15,813; T. E. Plimpton 28,892; D. D. Sobic 7,669. Also
includes options to purchase shares exercisable as of
March 2, 2009, as follows: J. G. Cardillo 144,664; T. E.
Plimpton 253,727; D. D. Sobic 51,139; M. A. Tembreull
197,955. Includes deferred cash awards accrued as stock units
without voting rights under the Deferred Compensation Plan (the
DC Plan) and the Long Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP) as follows:
T. E. Plimpton 11,691; M. A. Tembreull 134,625. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes shares in the Restricted Stock and Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the RSDC Plan)
over which the participant has sole voting but no investment
power. Also includes deferred stock units without voting rights
as follows: K. S. Hachigian 3,658; S. F. Page 20,059;
G. M. E. Spierkel 4,385; R. T. Parry 4,650; C. R. Williamson
8,621. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes the 18,384,751 shares described in footnote
(a) to the Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
table and 2,915 shares awarded January 2, 2009, under
the RSDC Plan. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes shares held in the name of a spouse and/or children to
which beneficial ownership is disclaimed. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes 63,516 shares allocated in the Companys SIP
for which he has sole voting and investment power; 254,373
restricted shares for which he has sole voting power; and
1,308,892 shares owned by a corporation over which he has
no voting or investment power. Also includes options to purchase
1,682,241 shares exercisable as of March 2, 2009 and
deferred cash awards accrued as 144,902 stock units under the DC
Plan and the LTIP. |
|
(f) |
|
M. A. Tembreull retired as Vice Chairman and a director of the
Company effective January 2, 2009. |
EXPENSES
OF SOLICITATION
Expenses for solicitation of proxies will be paid by the
Company. Solicitation will be by mail, except for any
electronic, telephone or personal solicitation by directors,
officers and employees of the Company, which will be made
without additional compensation. The Company has retained Laurel
Hill Advisory Group to aid in the solicitation of stockholders
for a fee of approximately $8,000 plus reimbursement of
expenses. The Company will request banks and brokers to solicit
proxies from their customers and will reimburse those banks and
brokers reasonable out-of-pocket costs for this solicitation.
4
|
|
ITEM 1:
|
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
|
Four Class II directors are to be elected at the meeting.
The persons named below have been designated by the Board as
nominees for election as Class II directors for a term
expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012. All of
the nominees are currently serving as directors of the Company.
BOARD
NOMINEES FOR CLASS II DIRECTORS
(TERMS EXPIRE AT THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING)
MARK C. PIGOTT, age 55, is Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and has held that position since January
1997. He was a Vice Chairman of the Company from January 1995 to
December 31, 1996, Executive Vice President from December
1993 to January 1995, Senior Vice President from January 1990 to
December 1993 and Vice President from October 1988 to December
1989. He is the nephew of retiring director James C. Pigott and
the brother of director John M. Pigott. He has served as a
director of the Company since 1994.
WILLIAM G. REED, JR., age 70, was chairman of Simpson
Investment Company, a forest products holding company and the
parent of Simpson Timber Company, from 1971 through June 1996.
He served as chairman of the board of Safeco Corporation from
January 2001 through December 2002 and as lead independent
director from 2000 to 2004. He has served as a director of the
Company since 1998.
WARREN R. STALEY, age 66, served as chairman and chief
executive officer of Cargill, Incorporated, an international
marketer, processor and distributor of agricultural, food,
financial and industrial products, from 2000 until his
retirement in 2007. He joined Cargill in 1969 and was elected
president and chief operating officer in 1998, chief executive
officer in 1999 and chairman in 2000. He has served as a
director of the Company since 2008.
CHARLES R. WILLIAMSON, age 60, was chairman and chief
executive officer of Unocal Corporation, the California-based
energy company, from 2001 until Unocal merged with Chevron
Corporation in August 2005. He served as executive vice
president of Chevron from August 2005 until his retirement in
December 2005. He served as a director of Unocal from 2000 to
2005. He held a variety of technical and management positions
with Unocal around the world. Mr. Williamson was the
chairman of the US-ASEAN Business Council from 2002 to 2005. He
is a director of the Weyerhaeuser Company and Talisman Energy
Inc. He has served as a director of the Company since 2006.
Retiring
Class II Director
JAMES C. PIGOTT, age 72, is president of Pigott
Enterprises, Inc., a private investment company, and has held
that position since 1983. He was chairman and chief executive
officer of Management Reports and Services, Inc., a provider of
business services, from 1986 until December 1999. He is the
uncle of Mark C. Pigott and John M. Pigott, both directors of
the Company. He has served as a director of the Company since
1972 and is retiring from the Board of Directors effective
April 27, 2009.
CLASS III
DIRECTORS (TERMS EXPIRE AT THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING)
ALISON J. CARNWATH, age 56, is chairman of MF Global
Limited, a Bermuda-based financial services firm. She is also
Chairman of Land Securities plc, the largest property company
listed on the London Stock Exchange, an adviser to Lexicon
Partners, an independent corporate finance advisory firm, and
chairman of the management board and investment committee at
ISIS Equity Partners, LLP, a private equity firm, both based in
the United Kingdom. She was chairman of Vitec Group plc, a
British supplier of products and services to the broadcast and
media industries, from April 1999 to October 2004 and was its
chief executive officer during 2001. She is a director of the
Man Group plc, a FTSE 100 Index member. She has served as a
director of the Company since 2005.
5
ROBERT T. PARRY, age 69, was president and chief executive
officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco from
1986 until his retirement in June 2004. In that position, he
served on the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal
Reserve System, the governmental body that sets monetary policy
and interest rates. He is also a director of the Janus Capital
Group Inc. He has served as a director of the Company since 2004.
JOHN M. PIGOTT, age 45, is a partner in Beta Business
Ventures, LLC, a private investment company formed in 2008, and
was a partner in the predecessor company Beta Capital Group, LLC
since 2003. He previously served in various management positions
within PACCAR from 1992 to 2003. He is the brother of Mark C.
Pigott and the nephew of James C. Pigott, both directors of the
Company. He was elected by the Board to serve as a director of
the Company, effective April 27, 2009.
GREGORY M. E. SPIERKEL, age 52, is chief executive officer
of Ingram Micro Inc., a leading California-based technology
distributor, and has held that position since June 2005. He
previously served as president from March 2004 to June 2005.
During his eleven year tenure with the company he held other
senior positions including executive vice president. He is also
a director of Ingram Micro. He has served as a director of the
Company since 2008.
CLASS I
DIRECTORS (TERMS EXPIRE AT THE 2011 ANNUAL MEETING)
JOHN M. FLUKE, JR., age 66, is chairman of Fluke Capital
Management, L.P., a private investment company, and has held
that position since 1990. He is a director of Tullys
Coffee Corporation. He has served as a director of the Company
since 1984.
KIRK S. HACHIGIAN, age 49, is chairman, president and chief
executive officer of Cooper Industries Ltd., manufacturer of
electrical products and tools. He was named chairman in February
2006, president and chief executive officer in May 2005 and
president and chief operating officer in August 2004. He is a
director of Cooper Industries Ltd. He has served as a director
of the Company since 2008.
STEPHEN F. PAGE, age 69, served as vice chairman and chief
financial officer and a director of United Technologies
Corporation (UTC), a provider of high-technology products and
services to the building systems and aerospace industries, from
2002 until his retirement in April 2004. From 1997 to 2002 he
was president and chief executive officer of Otis Elevator Co.,
a subsidiary of UTC. He is also a director of Lowes
Companies, Inc., and Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc. He has
served as a director of the Company since 2004.
THOMAS E. PLIMPTON, age 59, is Vice Chairman of the Company
and has held that position since September 2008. He also serves
as the Companys principal financial officer. He was
President from January 2003 to September 2008, Executive Vice
President from August 1998 to January 2003 and Senior Vice
President from August 1996 to August 1998. He was elected by the
Board to serve for the remainder of Michael A. Tembreulls
term as a Class I director, effective January 2, 2009.
THE BOARD
RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES.
6
BOARD
GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors has determined that the following persons
are independent directors as defined by NASDAQ Rule 4200:
Alison J. Carnwath, John M. Fluke, Jr., Kirk S. Hachigian,
Stephen F. Page, Robert T. Parry, James C. Pigott, William G.
Reed, Jr., Gregory M. E. Spierkel, Warren R. Staley, Harold
A. Wagner and Charles R. Williamson.
The Board of Directors maintains a corporate governance section
on its Website which includes key information about its
governance practices. The Companys Corporate Governance
Guidelines, its Board committee charters and its Code of
Business Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial
Officers are located at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/boardofdirectors.asp.
Stockholders may contact the Board of Directors by writing to:
The Board of Directors, PACCAR Inc, 11th Floor,
P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009, or by
e-mailing
PACCAR.Board@paccar.com. The Corporate Secretary will
receive, process and acknowledge receipt of all written
stockholder communications. Suggestions or concerns involving
accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be
directed to the Audit Committee chairman. Concerns regarding
other matters will be directed to the individual director or
committee named in the correspondence. If no identification is
made, the matter will be directed to the Executive Committee of
the Board.
The Board of Directors met four times during 2008. Each member
attended at least 75 percent of the combined total of
meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the
Board on which each served. All Company directors are expected
to attend each annual stockholder meeting. All directors
attended the annual stockholder meeting in April 2008.
The Board has four standing committees. The members of each
committee are listed below with the chairman of each committee
listed first:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Executive
|
|
Governance
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
Committee
|
|
J. M. Fluke, Jr.
|
|
C. R. Williamson
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
J. C. Pigott
|
S. F. Page
|
|
A. J. Carnwath
|
|
J. C. Pigott
|
|
A. J. Carnwath
|
W. R. Reed, Jr.
|
|
K. S. Hachigian
|
|
W. G. Reed, Jr.
|
|
J. M. Fluke, Jr.
|
C. R. Williamson
|
|
R. T. Parry
|
|
|
|
S. F. Page
|
|
|
G. M. E. Spierkel
|
|
|
|
W. R. Staley
|
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee has responsibility for the selection,
evaluation and compensation of the independent auditors and
approval of all services they provide. The Committee reviews the
Companys annual and quarterly financial statements,
monitors the integrity and effectiveness of the audit process,
and reviews the corporate compliance programs. It monitors the
Companys system of internal controls over financial
reporting and oversees the internal audit function. The Audit
Committee charter describes the Committees
responsibilities. It is posted at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/auditcommittee.asp.
All four members of the Audit Committee meet the independence
and financial literacy requirements of the SEC and NASDAQ rules.
The Board of Directors designated independent director John M.
Fluke, Jr., as Audit Committee financial expert. The
Committee met five times in 2008.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and
approving salaries and other compensation matters for executive
officers. It administers the LTIP, the Senior Executive Yearly
Incentive Compensation Plan and the DC Plan. The Committee
establishes base salaries, and annual and long-term performance
goals for executive officers. It also evaluates the CEOs
performance annually in executive session. It approves the
attainment of annual and long-term goals by the executive
officers. The Committee has authority to
7
employ a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of
the compensation of the Companys CEO or other executive
officers. The Committee does not retain a compensation
consultant on an annual basis and did not retain one in 2008.
The Compensation Committee charter describes the
Committees responsibilities. It is posted at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/compensationcommittee.asp.
All five members of the Compensation Committee meet the director
independence requirements of the NASDAQ rules and the
outside director requirements of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee met five times in
2008.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for
evaluating director candidates and selecting nominees for
approval by the independent members of the Board of Directors.
It also makes recommendations to the Board on corporate
governance matters including director compensation.
The Committee has established written criteria for the selection
of new directors, which is available at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/boardguidelines.asp.
To be a qualified director candidate, a person must have
achieved significant success in business, education or public
service, must not have a conflict of interest and must be
committed to representing the long-term interests of the
stockholders. In addition, the candidate must have the following
attributes:
|
|
|
|
|
the highest ethical and moral standards and integrity;
|
|
|
|
the intelligence, education and experience to make a meaningful
contribution to board deliberations;
|
|
|
|
the commitment, time and diligence to effectively discharge
board responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
mature judgment, objectivity, practicality and a willingness to
ask difficult questions; and
|
|
|
|
the commitment to work together as an effective group member to
deliberate and reach consensus for the betterment of the
stockholders and the long-term viability of the Company.
|
The Committee considers the names of director candidates
submitted by management and members of the Board of Directors.
It also considers recommendations by stockholders submitted in
writing to: Chairman, Nominating and Governance Committee,
PACCAR Inc, 11th Floor, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue,
WA 98009. Nominations by stockholders must comply with the
Company Bylaws requiring advance notice and meet the
requirements described in the section on Stockholder Proposals
and Director Nominations of this proxy statement. The Committee
engages the services of a private search firm from time to time
to assist in identifying and screening director candidates. The
Committee evaluates qualified director candidates and selects
nominees for approval by the independent members of the Board of
Directors. Mr. Charles R. Williamson and Mr. Warren R.
Staley are directors and nominees for election in this proxy
statement and were recommended to the Committee by a third-party
search firm.
The Nominating and Governance Committee charter describes the
Committees responsibilities. It is posted at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/nominatingcommittee.asp.
Each of the five Committee members meets the independence
requirements of the NASDAQ rules. The Committee met four times
in 2008.
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committee acts on routine Board matters when the
Board is not in session. The Committee took action twice in 2008.
8
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS
The following table provides information on compensation for
non-employee directors who served during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008:
Summary
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash (a)
|
|
Awards (b)
|
|
Compensation (c)
|
|
Total (d)
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
A. J. Carnwath
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
93,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,713
|
|
J. M. Fluke, Jr
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
90,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,086
|
|
K. S. Hachigian
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,703
|
|
S. F. Page
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
90,086
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
225,086
|
|
R. T. Parry
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
90,086
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
220,086
|
|
J. C. Pigott
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
180,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,587
|
|
W. G. Reed, Jr
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
90,086
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
210,086
|
|
G. M. E. Spierkel
|
|
|
96,924
|
|
|
|
15,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,522
|
|
W. R. Staley
|
|
|
26,250
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,703
|
|
H. A. Wagner
|
|
|
28,076
|
|
|
|
180,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,663
|
|
C. R. Williamson
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
74,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,912
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fees for non-employee directors include the 2008 annual retainer
of $75,000, board meeting fees of $7,500 per meeting and
committee meeting fees of $5,000 per meeting. If elected or
retired during the calendar year, the non-employee director
receives a prorated retainer. A single meeting attendance fee is
paid when a board and committee meeting are held on the same
day. S. F. Page, H. A. Wagner and C. R. Williamson elected to
defer retainer and meeting fees into stock units pursuant to the
terms of the RSDC Plan described in the Narrative below. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair value of restricted stock awards to each non-employee
director under the RSDC Plan is determined based on the number
of shares granted and the quoted price of the Companys
common stock on the grant date, and compensation expense is
recognized over the requisite service period as defined in
FAS 123R. Amounts shown above represent compensation
expense recognized in 2008 related to restricted stock awards
made under the RSDC Plan for 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
calculated in accordance with FAS 123R. Expense recognized
for K. S. Hachigian, G. M. E. Spierkel, W. R. Staley and
C. R. Williamson is prorated based on the date of
their initial Board membership. Expense recognized for H. A.
Wagner and J. C. Pigott includes the value of all remaining
restricted shares due to reaching mandatory retirement age. See
Note R to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
The grant date fair value of the restricted stock award granted
on January 2, 2008, to each non-employee director is
$90,000. On December 31, 2008, non-employee directors held
the following unvested shares of restricted stock: A. J.
Carnwath 6,659; J. M. Fluke, Jr., 6,659; K. S. Hachigian 741; S.
F. Page 6,659; R. T. Parry 6,659; J. C. Pigott 6,659; W. G.
Reed, Jr., 6,659; G. M. E. Spierkel 1,445; W. R. Staley 741; H.
A. Wagner 0; C. R. Williamson 5,003. |
|
(c) |
|
Directors may participate in the Companys matching gift
program on the same basis as U.S. salaried employees. Under the
program, the PACCAR Foundation matches donations participants
make to eligible educational institutions up to a maximum annual
donation of $5,000 per participant. |
|
(d) |
|
K. S. Hachigian, S. F. Page, R. T. Parry, G. M. E. Spierkel, H.
A. Wagner and C. R. Williamson deferred some or all of their
compensation earned in 2008. None of the deferred compensation
earned interest that was in excess of 120 percent of the
applicable federal long-term rate as prescribed under
Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Perquisites
were less than the $10,000 reporting threshold. |
9
Narrative
to Director Compensation Table
On the first business day of the year, each non-employee
director receives $90,000 in restricted stock or restricted
stock units under the RSDC Plan. The number of shares received
is determined by dividing $90,000 by the closing price of a
share of Company stock on the first business day of the year.
Non-employee directors elected during the calendar year receive
a prorated award to reflect the number of calendar quarters the
director will serve in the year of election. Restricted shares
vest three years after the date of grant or upon mandatory
retirement after age 72, death or disability. Directors
receive dividends and voting rights on all shares during the
vesting period. Effective January 1, 2008, the RSDC Plan
was amended to allow non-employee directors to elect to receive
a credit to the stock unit account in lieu of a grant of
restricted stock. The account is credited with the number of
shares otherwise applicable to the grant of restricted stock and
subject to the same vesting conditions. Thereafter dividends
earned are treated as if they were reinvested at the closing
price of Company stock on the date the dividend is payable.
Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a part of their
cash retainer and fees to an income account or to a stock unit
account under the RSDC Plan. The income account accrues interest
at a rate equal to the simple combined average of the monthly Aa
Industrial Bond yield averages for the immediately preceding
quarter and is compounded quarterly. Stock unit accounts are
credited with the number of shares of Company common stock that
could have been purchased at the closing price on the date the
cash compensation is payable. Thereafter dividends earned are
treated as if they were reinvested at the closing price of
Company stock on the date the dividend is payable. The balances
in a directors deferred accounts are paid out at or after
retirement or termination in accordance with the directors
deferred account election. The balance in the stock unit account
is distributed in shares of the Companys common stock.
The Company provides transportation for or reimburses
non-employee directors for travel and out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with their services. It also pays or
reimburses directors for expenses incurred to participate in
continuing education programs.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors
All non-employee directors are expected to hold at least
$200,000 worth of Company stock,
and/or
deferred stock units while serving as a director. Directors have
three years from date of appointment to attain this ownership
threshold. All non-employee directors with three or more years
of service meet the stock ownership guidelines.
POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Under its Charter, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
is responsible for reviewing and approving related person
transactions as set forth in Item 404 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission
Regulation S-K.
The Committee will consider whether such transactions are in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Company
has written procedures designed to bring such transactions to
the attention of management. Management is responsible for
presenting related person transactions to the Audit Committee
for review and approval.
10
COMPENSATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)
Compensation
Program Objectives and Structure
PACCARs compensation programs are designed to attract and
retain high-quality executives, link incentives to the
Companys superior performance results and align the
interests of management with those of stockholders. These
programs offer compensation that is competitive with companies
that operate in the same industries globally. PACCARs goal
is to achieve superior performance measured against its industry
peers. Under the supervision of the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors (the Committee), composed
exclusively of independent directors, the Company compensation
objectives utilize programs that have delivered 70 consecutive
years of net income, yearly dividends since 1941 and excellent
stockholder returns. The compensation framework has these
components:
Short-term performance compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary. The fixed amount of compensation for
performing day-to-day responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
Annual incentive cash compensation. Annual cash
awards that focus on the attainment of Company yearly
profitability and individual business unit goals.
|
Long-term performance compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
An equity and cash-based Long Term Incentive Plan
(LTIP) that focuses on long-term growth in
stockholder value, including three-year performance versus
industry peers as measured by growth in net income, return on
sales and return on capital. The equity-based compensation
consists of stock options and restricted stock.
|
The Committee believes that this combination of salary, cash
incentives and equity-based compensation provides appropriate
incentives for executives to deliver superior short and
long-term business performance and stockholder returns.
The Named Executive Officers and all U.S. salaried
employees participate in the Companys retirement programs.
The Named Executive Officers also participate in the
Companys unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan described
on page 23, which provides a retirement benefit to those
employees affected by the maximum benefit limitations permitted
for qualified plans by the Internal Revenue Code and other
qualified plan benefit limitations. The Company does not provide
any other significant perquisites or executive benefits to its
Named Executive Officers.
Executive
Compensation Criteria
The Compensation Committee considers a number of important
factors when reviewing and determining executive compensation,
including Company performance, individual performance and
compensation for executives among peer organizations. The
Committee also considers the opinion of the Chief Executive
Officer when determining compensation for the executives that
report to him.
Role of Compensation Consultant. The Committee
does not retain a compensation consultant on an annual basis and
it did not retain one in 2008.
Industry Compensation Comparison Groups. The
Compensation Committee periodically utilizes information from
industry-published compensation surveys as well as compensation
data from peer companies to determine if compensation for the
Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers is
competitive with the market. The Committee believes that
comparative compensation information should be used in its
deliberations, but it does not specify a target
compensation level for any given executive but rather a range of
compensation. The Committee has discretion to determine the
nature and extent to which it will use comparative compensation
data.
Compensation of the Named Executive Officers reflects the
Committees consideration of comparative data and analysis
from a 2006 survey of 86 companies with median revenues of
$11.3 billion conducted by
11
Hewitt Associates (Hewitt). The companies in that
survey are listed on page 11 of the Companys 2008
proxy statement. Hewitt did not advise the Committee or make any
recommendations regarding the data it supplied nor did it
provide any other executive compensation services. The Committee
assessed 2006 pay levels for the Named Executive Officers based
in part on the data provided by Hewitt and a comparison of
Company compensation levels against the 50th percentile of
the surveyed companies. The total direct compensation of each
Named Executive Officer was within the competitive range of
survey data.
Peer Companies. As part of its analysis of
comparative data, the Committee includes compensation data from
Peer Companies that comprise the index used in the stock
performance graph set forth in the Companys Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and page 28 of this proxy statement. In particular, the
Company measures its financial performance against Peer
Companies when evaluating achievement of the cash portion of the
LTIP Company performance goal and applicable goals under the
restricted stock share match program. The nine Peer Companies
for the LTIP
2006-2008
and
2007-2009
cycles are:
|
|
|
|
|
ArvinMeritor Inc.
|
|
Caterpillar Inc.
|
|
Cummins Inc.
|
Dana Corporation
|
|
Deere & Company
|
|
Eaton Corporation
|
Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd.
|
|
Navistar International Corporation
|
|
Oshkosh Truck Corporation
|
As discussed in the 2008 proxy statement, effective with the
LTIP cycle beginning January
2008-2010,
the following are the Peer Companies for purposes of the Company
performance goal in the LTIP cash program and the applicable
goals under the share match program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Revenue
|
|
Company Name
|
|
(in billions)
|
|
|
Caterpillar Inc.
|
|
$
|
51,324
|
|
Cummins Inc.
|
|
|
14,342
|
|
Danaher Corp.
|
|
|
12,697
|
|
Deere & Company
|
|
|
27,872
|
|
Dover Corp.
|
|
|
7,569
|
|
Eaton Corporation
|
|
|
15,376
|
|
Harley-Davidson Inc.
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
Honeywell International Inc.
|
|
|
36,556
|
|
Illinois Tool Works
|
|
|
15,869
|
|
Ingersoll-Rand Co Ltd.
|
|
|
13,227
|
|
United Technologies Corp.
|
|
|
58,681
|
|
PACCAR Inc
|
|
|
14,972
|
|
Elements
of Total Compensation
The Companys executive compensation program is comprised
of base salaries, annual cash incentives, and long-term
incentives consisting of cash, stock options and restricted
stock. The Committee made no significant changes to the elements
of the compensation program for the Named Executive Officers for
2008.
Compensation Mix. The Companys executive
compensation program structure includes a balance of annual and
long-term incentives, cash and Company equity. At higher levels
of responsibility within the Company, the senior executives have
a larger percentage of total compensation at risk based on
Company performance incentive programs. For 2008, the Committee
approved target allocations as displayed below. The Company
believes these allocations promote its objectives of profitable
growth and superior long-term results.
12
|
|
|
Chairman & CEO
|
|
Other Named Executive
Officers
|
2008 Target Compensation Structure
|
|
2008 Average Target Compensation Structure
|
|
Base Salary. Base salary provides a fixed,
baseline level of compensation that is not contingent upon
Company performance. It is important that base salaries are
competitive with industry peer companies to attract and retain
high-caliber executives. The midpoints of the base salary ranges
are set at approximately the market median of the 2006 Hewitt
survey, with minimums at 70 percent of the midpoint and
maximums at 130 percent of the midpoint and were not
changed in 2008. An executive officers actual salary
relative to this salary range reflects his or her
responsibility, experience and individual performance.
The Committee reviews base salaries every 12 to 18 months
and may or may not approve changes. Consistent with this
practice, the Committee reviewed the salary of each Named
Executive Officer and approved increases in 2008. On
January 1, 2008, the Chief Executive Officer received a
3.8 percent increase over his May 1, 2006 base salary
(2.3 percent annualized). The annualized increase for the
other Named Executive Officers ranged from 1.7 to
4.5 percent and occurred 15 to 18 months from their
previous salary increase. During the fall of 2008,
Mr. Plimpton, Mr. Cardillo and Mr. Sobic were
promoted to their current positions. Accordingly, each received
a salary increase to reflect their additional responsibilities.
Their average salary increase was 15.2 percent.
The Committee made its salary decisions after considering the
Companys excellent performance, the compensation
guidelines and internal equity. The Chief Executive Officer was
not involved in discussions regarding his salary. He suggested
salary recommendations to the Committee for the other Named
Executive Officers. All salary increases were consistent with
the Companys overall compensation guidelines. The
Committee believes that the base salary of each of the Named
Executive Officers is appropriate based on scope of
responsibility, tenure with the Company, individual performance
and competitive pay practices.
Annual Incentive Cash Compensation
(IC). This program provides yearly
cash incentives for the Named Executive Officers to achieve
annual Company profit and business unit goals. The Committee
sets annual performance goals and a threshold, target and
maximum award for each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a
percentage of base salary. Awards are measured on a sliding
scale as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Goal Achieved
|
|
|
<70
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
115
|
%
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
140% and above
|
% of Target Paid
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
%
|
|
200%
|
A hallmark of the annual cash incentive program has been a
consistent and rigorous focus on achieving the Companys
annual net profit goal. The Committee has chosen net profit, not
EBITDA or operating profit, as the chief financial metric for
this program because it is the primary indicator of corporate
performance to stockholders. When setting incentive compensation
goals for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee believes
that corporate performance is an appropriate measure of
individual performance. Accordingly, the
13
2008 award for each Named Executive Officer is based upon
Company performance relative to an overall net profit goal
proposed by Company management and approved by the Committee
within the first 90 days of each year. The target level
represents an amount of net profit that the Committee determines
is attainable with outstanding performance under expected
economic conditions. The Committee assesses annual goal
achievement and approves awards for the Named Executive Officers.
IC Awards for the Named Executive Officers are subject to the
terms of the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan
(the IC Plan) approved by the stockholders as
required by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The maximum annual incentive cash award under the Plan is
$4,000,000. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or
eliminate (but not increase) any award earned by the Named
Executive Officers based on an assessment of individual
performance.
For 2008, the Companys net profit target was
$1.1 billion and actual net profit was $1.02 billion,
an excellent result considering the difficult recession. The
Committee approved payouts of 85 percent of each Named
Executive Officers target award, which corresponds with
achievement of 92.5 percent of the net profit goal. The
Committee approved payments consistent with the calculated goal
achievement for each Named Executive Officer and did not
exercise discretion to reduce or modify any payment. The
following table outlines the 2008 goals and incentive awards
achieved for each Named Executive Officer.
The Committee notes that M. C. Pigott generously declined his
2008 annual incentive payment of $1,147,500 that he earned, in
recognition of the challenging economic recession and the
negative effect upon the Companys employees and
stockholders. The Committee accepted his decision. Therefore,
the Summary Compensation Table on page 19 indicates that
his 2008 non-equity incentive plan compensation was zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Achieved
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
Award
|
|
|
Measure as
|
|
|
as a %
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
as a % of
|
|
|
a % of
|
|
|
of
|
|
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Measure
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Goal
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
Company Profit Goal
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
Company Profit Goal
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
Company Profit Goal
|
|
|
72
|
(a)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
Company Profit Goal
|
|
|
64
|
(a)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
Company Profit Goal
|
|
|
56
|
(a)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Target percentages were prorated based on the number of months
the individual was in a particular position and salary level. |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation (LTIP). The
Companys long-term incentive program is based on a
multi-year performance period and provides annual grants of
stock options, restricted stock and cash incentive awards. The
LTIP aligns the interests of stockholders with those of
executives to focus on long-term growth in stockholder value.
The 2008 target for each element of the long-term compensation
program for each Named Executive Officer is calculated as a
percentage of base salary as indicated in the table below. These
targets were unchanged from 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
375
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
260
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
210
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
14
Long-term incentive compensation cash
award. This program focuses on long-term growth
in stockholder value by providing an incentive for superior
Company performance that is measured against Peer Companies
performance over a three-year period. Company performance is
measured by three-year compound growth in net income, return on
sales and return on capital (weighted equally) as compared to
the Peer Companies (Company Performance Goal). Named
Executive Officers and all executive officers are eligible for a
long-term incentive cash award based upon three-year performance
goals approved by the Committee with a new performance period
beginning every calendar year.
For the
2008-2010
cycle, the Committee approved the following goals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Performance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Performance
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Measures for
|
|
Measure as a
|
|
Name
|
|
LTIP 2008-2010 Cycle
|
|
% of Target
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
Company Performance Goal
|
|
|
100
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
Company Performance Goal
|
|
|
100
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
Company Performance Goal
|
|
|
100
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
Company Performance Goal
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Business Unit Performance
|
|
|
50
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
Company Performance Goal
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Business Unit Profit
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
Business Unit Performance
|
|
|
25
|
|
The Committee believes that three-year compound growth in net
income, return on sales and return on capital are excellent
indicators of the Companys performance against the Peer
Companies. The Company has used this rigorous comparison goal
for over ten years. During that period the Company has
demonstrated extraordinary performance against the Peer
Companies and provided superior returns to stockholders. The
target amount will be earned if the Companys financial
performance ranks above at least half of the Peer Companies. The
maximum cash award amount will be earned if the Companys
financial performance ranks above all of the Peer Companies. No
award will be earned if the Companys financial performance
ranks in the bottom 25 percent of the Peer Companies.
The remaining portion of the award for certain of the Named
Executive Officers is based upon individual business unit goals
determined by the Chief Executive Officer similar to those
described above for the annual incentive plan, measured over a
three-year performance cycle. The Committee assesses goal
achievement for the prior three-year period in the April
following completion of the applicable cycle and approves awards
for the Named Executive Officers at such time. Long-term
incentive cash awards are measured on a sliding scale as
indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Goal Achieved
|
|
|
<75
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
150% and above
|
% of Target Paid
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
200%
|
In April 2008, the Committee determined the cash awards for the
three-year period
2005-2007
ending December 31, 2007. One hundred percent of the cash
award for M. C. Pigott, M. A. Tembreull and T. E. Plimpton was
based on the Company Performance Goal. For the
2005-2007
LTIP cycle, the Company achieved superior results and tied for
second among all of Peer Companies that reported earnings. The
Committee approved a payout of 162.5 percent of target on
the Company Performance Goal for each Named Executive Officer
reflecting excellent goal achievement and did not exercise
discretion to reduce or modify payment. The remaining fifty
percent of the award for J. G. Cardillo was based on business
unit profit. A maximum payout was approved based on that goal
achievement which resulted in an overall payout of
181.3 percent of target reflecting excellent goal
achievement. The remaining sixty percent of the award for
D. D. Sobic was based on business unit profit (forty
percent) and individual performance (twenty percent). The
Committee determined that D. D. Sobic exceeded each goal and
approved an overall payout of 181 percent of target
reflecting excellent goal achievement. The long-term cash awards
for
2006-2008
LTIP cycle have not been determined as of the date of this proxy
statement.
15
The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible participant
in any year under this program is $6,000,000. The award is also
subject to the conditions of payment set forth in the Long Term
Incentive Plan, as required by Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The Committee, in its sole discretion,
may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) any award earned by
the Named Executive Officers based on an assessment of
individual performance.
Stock options. The Committee includes stock
options in its compensation program because stock options link
the interests of executives directly with stockholders
interests through increased individual stock ownership. Stock
options are granted by the Committee once each year on a
predetermined date after the fourth-quarter earnings release,
and are not repriced. They become exercisable at the end of a
three-year vesting period and expire ten years after the date of
grant.
The Compensation Committee granted stock options on
January 30, 2008. The number of options was determined by
multiplying the executives base salary on January 30,
2008, by a target award percentage and dividing by the average
closing price of the Companys stock on the first five
trading days of the year. The exercise price of stock options is
the closing price of the Companys stock on the date of
grant, January 30, 2008. All stock options granted in 2008
vest and become exercisable on January 1, 2011, and remain
exercisable until January 30, 2018 unless the
participants employment terminates for reasons other than
retirement at age 65, or the participant is demoted to an
ineligible position. Vesting may be accelerated in the event of
a change in control.
Annual restricted stock
program. Performance-based restricted stock is
included in the program because it provides an opportunity for
executives to earn Company equity with performance-based
compensation deductible under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The Committee sets a Company performance
goal during the first 90 days of the year and restricted
stock grants are made in the following year if the Committee
determines that the performance goal is achieved. The restricted
stock vests 25 percent per year over a four-year period
beginning in the year following the grant. Unvested shares are
forfeited upon termination unless termination is by reason of
death, disability or retirement. All shares vest immediately
upon a change in control. Each Named Executive Officer has the
same rights as all other stockholders to vote the shares and
receive cash dividends.
The Named Executive Officers received a grant of
performance-based restricted stock on January 30, 2008,
after the Committee determined that the performance goal of four
percent return on 2007 sales was exceeded. The number of
restricted shares granted was determined by multiplying the
executives annual base salary by a target award percentage
and dividing by the average closing price of the Companys
stock for the first five trading days of 2008. All awards were
consistent with the target award percentage and the Committee
did not exercise discretion to make any material adjustments.
Twenty-five percent of the shares vested on January 1,
2009, and 25 percent of shares will vest on each successive
January 1 through January 1, 2012.
Compensation
of the Chief Executive Officer
The Committee applies the same compensation philosophy, policies
and comparative data analysis to the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer as it applies to the other Named Executive
Officers. The Chief Executive Officer is the only officer with
overall responsibility for all corporate functions and, as a
result has a greater percentage of his total compensation based
on the overall financial performance of the Company. Under his
leadership, the Company has significantly outperformed both its
Peer Companies and the S&P 500 Index for the ten-year
period ending December 31, 2008.
In addition to the change to base salary discussed above, in
2008 the Committee approved a grant of 150,000 restricted shares
to match an equal number of shares the Chief Executive Officer
personally purchased through the exercise of stock options.
Under this share match program, if the Chief Executive Officer
purchases Company stock either by exercising stock options or
through open market purchases, he may receive a matching award
of restricted stock if rigorous performance goals are met. The
program provides for a maximum of 562,500 restricted shares and
an annual limit of 150,000 shares. Restricted match shares
vest after five years if the Companys earnings per share
growth over the same five-year period meets or exceeds at least
fifty percent of the Peer Companies. The Chief Executive Officer
has the same rights as all other
16
stockholders to vote the shares and receive cash dividends. With
certain exceptions, all restricted match shares will be
forfeited if the performance threshold is not achieved or if the
Chief Executive Officer terminates employment with the Company
during the vesting period. If the purchased shares are sold
before the vesting period, an equal number of restricted match
shares will be forfeited.
Deferral
of Annual and Long-Term Performance Awards
The Committee administers a DC Plan described on page 23
which allows eligible employees to defer cash incentive awards
into an income account or a stock unit account. Both accounts
are unfunded and unsecured. This program provides tax and
retirement planning benefits to participants and market-based
returns on amounts deferred. Certain deferrals are subject to
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Payouts from the income
account are made in cash either in a lump sum or in a maximum of
15 annual installments in accordance with the executives
payment election. Stock units credited under the Deferred
Compensation Plan are disbursed in a one-time payment of Company
shares. Participation in the DC Plan is voluntary.
Stock
Ownership Guidelines
Effective January 1, 2008, the Board of Directors approved
stock ownership guidelines for the Companys executive
officers and directors to link their long-term economic interest
directly to that of the Company stockholders. The Chief
Executive Officer is expected to hold five times his base salary
in Company stock
and/or
deferred stock units. Other executive officers are expected to
hold one times their base salary in Company stock, vested stock
options
and/or
deferred stock units. Executive officers have three years to
attain this ownership threshold. All executive officers are in
compliance as of January 1, 2009.
Changes
Approved for 2009
Due to the challenging business environment in 2009, the
Committee approved the following reductions to the annual and
long-term compensation programs for all participants including
the Named Executive Officers for the 2009 cycle only.
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum award that may be earned under the 2009 annual
incentive cash compensation program is reduced from
200 percent to 160 percent of the executives
target award.
|
|
|
|
The percentage of base salary used to determine long-term
compensation target awards for the
2009-2011
cycle is reduced to the 2005 level. The year 2005 was chosen
because it is the year preceding the most recent structural
increase in the program. A comparison of the 2009 target and the
2008 target for each element of the long-term compensation
program for each Named Executive Officer, calculated as a
percentage of base salary, is indicated in the following table.
A 2009 target was not established for Mr. Tembreull because
he retired effective January 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2010 Cycle
|
|
2009-2011 Cycle(a)
|
|
|
Long-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
term
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
term
|
|
Stock
|
|
Restricted
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
Options
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Cash
|
|
Options
|
|
Stock
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
375
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
450
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
300
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
325
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
260
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
325
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
210
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
260
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Annual restricted stock grants included in the long-term
compensation program will not be made for the 2009 performance
period for the 2009 cycle only. |
17
Effect of
Post-Termination Events
The Company has no written employment agreement with its Chief
Executive Officer or with any Named Executive Officer. Executive
compensation programs provide full benefits only if a Named
Executive Officer remains with the Company until normal
retirement at age 65. In general, upon a termination
without cause a Named Executive Officer retains vested benefits
but receives no enhancements or severance. In a termination for
cause, the executive forfeits all benefits except those provided
under a qualified pension plan. Annual and long-term cash
incentives are prorated upon retirement or death and are awarded
at the maximum level upon a change in control. The annual
restricted stock grants become fully vested at retirement, death
or a change in control. The Company believes that the benefits
described in this section help it attract and retain its
executive officers by providing financial security in the event
of certain qualifying terminations of employment or a change of
control of the Company. The fact that the Company provides these
benefits does not materially affect other decisions that the
Company makes regarding compensation. The Company maintains a
separation pay plan for all U.S. salaried employees that
provides a single payment of up to six months of base salary in
the event of job elimination in a business restructuring or
reduction in the workforce. The Named Executive Officers are
eligible for the benefit on the same terms as any other eligible
U.S. salaried employee.
Effect of
Accounting or Tax Treatment
Company policy is to structure compensation arrangements that
preserve tax deductions for executive compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Cash awards
paid to Named Executive Officers under the IC Plan and under the
LTIP are subject to certain conditions of payment intended to
preserve deductibility imposed under Section 162(m). The
Committee establishes a yearly funding plan limit equal to a
percentage of the Companys net income and assigns each
Named Executive Officer a percentage of each fund. In 2008, the
funding limit for the Named Executive Officers under the IC Plan
equaled two percent of Companys net income and the limit
for the LTIP equaled three quarters of one percent of the
Companys cumulative net income for the
2008-2010
performance cycle. The Committee can exercise discretion to
reduce or eliminate any award earned by the Named Executive
Officers based on an assessment of individual performance
against preapproved goals. The cash incentive awards to the
Named Executive Officers under both plans are subject to the
pre-established funding and plan limits even if some or all of
the executives performance goals have been exceeded. The
Committee retains the flexibility to pay compensation that is
not fully deductible within the limitations of Section 162(m) if
it determines that such action is in the best interests of the
Company and its stockholders in order to attract, retain and
reward outstanding executives. The Company offers compensation
programs that are intended to be tax efficient for the Company
and for the executive officers.
Conclusion
The Companys compensation programs are designed and
administered in a manner consistent with its executive
compensation philosophy and guiding principles. The programs
emphasize the retention of key executives and appropriate
rewards for excellent results. The Committee monitors these
programs in recognition of the dynamic marketplace in which the
Company competes for talent. The Company will continue to
emphasize pay-for-performance and equity-based incentive
programs that compensate executives for results that are
consistent with generating outstanding performance for its
stockholders.
18
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Section (CD&A) for 2008 with management. Based
on the Committees review and its discussions with
management, the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section be
included in the Companys proxy statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting.
THE
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
C. R. Williamson, Chairman
A. J. Carnwath
K. S. Hachigian
R. T. Parry
G. M. E. Spierkel
Summary
Compensation
The following table provides information on compensation for the
Named Executive Officers for the last three fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
($) (a)
|
|
($) (b)
|
|
($) (c)
|
|
($) (d)
|
|
($) (e)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
1,348,846
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,421
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,396
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,400,351
|
|
|
$
|
11,500
|
|
|
$
|
5,819,514
|
|
Chairman and Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
2,673,144
|
|
|
|
1,310,749
|
|
|
|
3,277,950
|
|
|
|
935,940
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
9,509,033
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
1,282,692
|
|
|
|
840,663
|
|
|
|
1,308,777
|
|
|
|
3,804,168
|
|
|
|
1,371,714
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
8,619,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
899,423
|
|
|
|
482,831
|
|
|
|
568,188
|
|
|
|
573,750
|
|
|
|
817,495
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
3,353,187
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
875,000
|
|
|
|
538,730
|
|
|
|
675,914
|
|
|
|
1,722,000
|
|
|
|
960,777
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
4,783,671
|
|
(principal
financial officer)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
862,885
|
|
|
|
505,827
|
|
|
|
699,418
|
|
|
|
2,040,313
|
|
|
|
1,261,036
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
5,380,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
736,885
|
|
|
|
380,923
|
|
|
|
438,761
|
|
|
|
451,633
|
|
|
|
916,476
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
2,936,178
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
415,611
|
|
|
|
516,820
|
|
|
|
1,216,440
|
|
|
|
704,432
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
3,539,553
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
659,788
|
|
|
|
385,368
|
|
|
|
513,821
|
|
|
|
1,430,834
|
|
|
|
931,121
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
3,931,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
552,423
|
|
|
|
221,290
|
|
|
|
247,235
|
|
|
|
301,183
|
|
|
|
516,110
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
1,849,741
|
|
President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
495,000
|
|
|
|
191,964
|
|
|
|
258,824
|
|
|
|
690,384
|
|
|
|
367,530
|
|
|
|
78,020
|
|
|
|
2,081,722
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
441,154
|
|
|
|
170,596
|
|
|
|
214,682
|
|
|
|
612,490
|
|
|
|
334,385
|
|
|
|
184,700
|
|
|
|
1,958,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
408,019
|
|
|
|
137,769
|
|
|
|
151,748
|
|
|
|
196,563
|
|
|
|
292,890
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
1,198,489
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents compensation expense recognized in 2008 related to
restricted stock awards made under the Companys LTIP on
January 30, 2008, February 19, 2008, January 31,
2007, February 5, 2007, and April 25, 2006, calculated
in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123R
(FAS 123R). For additional information
concerning FAS 123R accounting assumptions, refer to Notes
in the Consolidated Financial Statement included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the applicable fiscal year as shown in footnote
(b) below. 2008 amounts for M. C. Pigott reflect the
reduction of a compensation expense recorded in 2007 of $778,791
in accordance with the recognition principles of FAS 123R. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents compensation expense recognized in 2008 related to
stock options granted on January 30, 2008, January 31,
2007 and January 26, 2006, calculated in accordance with
FAS 123R. For additional FAS 123R accounting
information, including the Companys Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model assumptions, refer to the Notes in the
Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the applicable fiscal year ending as follows:
December 31, 2008 Note R;
December 31, 2007 Note P;
December 31, 2006 Note A. |
19
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Amounts for 2008 represent the annual cash incentive awards
earned in 2008 that were determined and paid in 2009 under the
IC Plan. M. C. Pigott declined the $1,147,500 annual incentive
award he earned in 2008 in recognition of the recession that is
affecting the Companys employees and stockholders. Long
Term Performance Cash awards earned under the LTIP during the
2006-2008
cycle will not be determined until late April 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents the interest earned under the DC Plan in excess of
120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as
prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
(M. C. Pigott $1,029; M. A. Tembreull $21,928; T. E. Plimpton
$19,624; J. G. Cardillo $13,072; and the aggregate change in
value during 2008 of benefits accrued under the Companys
qualified defined benefit retirement plan and Supplemental
Retirement Plan (M. C. Pigott $1,399,321; M. A. Tembreull
$795,567; T. E. Plimpton $896,852; J. G. Cardillo $503,038; D.
D. Sobic $292,890). |
|
(e) |
|
Represents Company matching contributions to the Companys
401(k) Savings Investment Plan of $11,500 for each Named
Executive Officer for 2008, $11,250 for 2007 and $11,000 for
2006. Aggregate perquisites were less than $10,000 for each
Named Executive Officer. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the
Named Executive Officers during 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Number
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
of
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Base
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
Plan
|
|
Shares
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
And Option
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Target
|
|
or Units
|
|
Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,810,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Match(b)
|
|
|
2/19/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,444,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,956
|
|
|
$
|
45.74
|
|
|
|
848,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Cash(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184,091
|
|
|
$
|
2,025,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,050,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Cash(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,776
|
|
|
|
45.74
|
|
|
|
452,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Cash(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,818
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Cash(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,328
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,636
|
|
|
|
45.74
|
|
|
|
357,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Cash(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,091
|
|
|
|
639,000
|
|
|
|
1,278,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Cash(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,533
|
|
|
|
531,333
|
|
|
|
1,062,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,158
|
|
|
|
45.74
|
|
|
|
215,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Cash(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
346,500
|
|
|
|
693,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Cash(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,733
|
|
|
|
354,333
|
|
|
|
708,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,012
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(a)
|
|
|
1/30/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,804
|
|
|
|
45.74
|
|
|
|
135,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTIP Cash(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
231,000
|
|
|
|
462,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Cash(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
|
231,250
|
|
|
|
462,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents grants and awards under
the LTIP described on pages
14-16.
|
(b)
|
|
Represents shares awarded under the
LTIP restricted share match program described on page 16.
The grant date fair value is based on the closing price of
Company stock on February 19, 2008 of $42.96.
|
(c)
|
|
Represents awards under the
Companys Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation
Plan (IC) and described on page 13.
|
20
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows all outstanding stock option and
restricted stock awards held by the Named Executive Officers on
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards(a)
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
or Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Number
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
of Unearned
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units of
|
|
Shares, Units or
|
|
Units or Other
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
|
That Have
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(g)
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
310,870
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10.6235
|
|
|
|
1/1/02
|
|
|
|
4/27/09
|
|
|
|
29,468
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
842,785
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
(e)
|
|
$
|
1,072,500
|
|
|
|
|
351,298
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8.2469
|
|
|
|
1/1/03
|
|
|
|
1/25/10
|
|
|
|
33,680
|
(c)
|
|
|
963,248
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(f)
|
|
|
4,290,000
|
|
|
|
|
342,339
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10.1975
|
|
|
|
1/1/04
|
|
|
|
1/24/11
|
|
|
|
39,582
|
(d)
|
|
|
1,132,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,724
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12.5353
|
|
|
|
1/1/05
|
|
|
|
1/23/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,427
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.9555
|
|
|
|
1/1/06
|
|
|
|
1/15/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,067
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25.3126
|
|
|
|
1/1/07
|
|
|
|
1/15/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,043
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32.1111
|
|
|
|
1/1/08
|
|
|
|
1/20/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
147,343
|
|
|
|
32.2267
|
|
|
|
1/1/09
|
|
|
|
1/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
112,266
|
|
|
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
1/31/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
98,956
|
|
|
|
45.7400
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
1/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
34,759
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25.3126
|
|
|
|
1/1/07
|
|
|
|
1/15/14
|
|
|
|
7,922
|
(b)
|
|
|
226,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,983
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32.1111
|
|
|
|
1/1/08
|
|
|
|
1/20/15
|
|
|
|
9,067
|
(c)
|
|
|
259,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
79,213
|
|
|
|
32.2267
|
|
|
|
1/1/09
|
|
|
|
1/26/16
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
(d)
|
|
|
301,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
60,450
|
|
|
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
1/31/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
52,776
|
|
|
|
45.7400
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
1/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
74,128
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.9555
|
|
|
|
1/1/06
|
|
|
|
1/15/13
|
|
|
|
6,034
|
(b)
|
|
|
172,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,255
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25.3126
|
|
|
|
1/1/07
|
|
|
|
1/15/14
|
|
|
|
6,995
|
(c)
|
|
|
200,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,990
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32.1111
|
|
|
|
1/1/08
|
|
|
|
1/20/15
|
|
|
|
8,328
|
(d)
|
|
|
238,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
60,354
|
|
|
|
32.2267
|
|
|
|
1/1/09
|
|
|
|
1/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46,635
|
|
|
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
1/31/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
41,636
|
|
|
|
45.7400
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
1/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
36,235
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12.5353
|
|
|
|
1/1/05
|
|
|
|
1/23/12
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
(b)
|
|
|
76,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,198
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.9555
|
|
|
|
1/1/06
|
|
|
|
1/15/13
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
(c)
|
|
|
92,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,486
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25.3126
|
|
|
|
1/1/07
|
|
|
|
1/15/14
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
(d)
|
|
|
138,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1111
|
|
|
|
1/1/08
|
|
|
|
1/20/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
28,057
|
|
|
|
32.2267
|
|
|
|
1/1/09
|
|
|
|
1/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29,640
|
|
|
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
1/31/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25,158
|
|
|
|
45.7400
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
1/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1975
|
|
|
|
1/1/04
|
|
|
|
1/24/11
|
|
|
|
3,012
|
(d)
|
|
|
86,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5353
|
|
|
|
1/1/05
|
|
|
|
1/23/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9555
|
|
|
|
1/1/06
|
|
|
|
1/15/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.3126
|
|
|
|
1/1/07
|
|
|
|
1/15/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1111
|
|
|
|
1/1/08
|
|
|
|
1/20/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,321
|
|
|
|
32.2267
|
|
|
|
1/1/09
|
|
|
|
1/26/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
18,618
|
|
|
|
44.5600
|
|
|
|
1/1/10
|
|
|
|
1/31/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,804
|
|
|
|
45.7400
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
1/30/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents stock options granted under the LTIP. The vesting
date may be accelerated if a change in control occurs. Options
expire ten years from the date of grant unless employment is
terminated earlier. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents restricted stock granted April 26, 2006.
Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent
January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1,
2009 and January 1, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents restricted stock granted on January 31, 2007.
Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent
January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1,
2009; January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents restricted stock granted on January 30, 2008.
Twenty-five percent of the shares vest on each subsequent
January 1. The remaining vesting dates are January 1,
2009; January 1, 2010; January 1, 2011 and
January 1, 2012. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents restricted stock under the share match program
scheduled to vest on December 31, 2011. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents restricted stock under the share match program
scheduled to vest on December 31, 2012. |
|
(g) |
|
The amount shown represents the number of shares multiplied by
the closing price of the Companys stock on
December 31, 2008 of $28.60. |
21
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows all stock options exercised and
restricted stock awards that vested during 2008 for the Named
Executive Officers and the value realized upon exercise or
vesting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
200,598
|
|
|
$
|
6,509,194
|
|
|
|
25,962
|
|
|
$
|
1,414,410
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
877,575
|
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
|
|
380,488
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
140,673
|
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
291,468
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
131,460
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Pension
Benefits
The following table shows the present value of the retirement
benefit payable to the Named Executive Officers under the
Companys noncontributory retirement plan and Supplemental
Retirement Plan as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Present
|
|
During
|
|
|
|
|
of Years
|
|
Value of
|
|
Last
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Year
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
632,115
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
9,146,665
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,202,320
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
9,349,656
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
924,031
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
5,311,049
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
570,372
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1,731,383
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
422,212
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
730,377
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
The Companys qualified noncontributory retirement plan has
been in effect since 1947. The Named Executive Officers
participate in this plan on the same basis as other salaried
employees. Employees are eligible to become a member in the plan
after completion of 12 months of employment with at least
1,000 hours of service. The plan provides benefits based on
years of service and salary. Participants are vested in their
retirement benefits after five years of service.
The benefit for each year of service, up to a maximum of
35 years, is equal to one percent of highest average salary
plus 0.5 percent of highest average salary in excess of the
Social-Security-covered compensation level. Highest average
salary is defined as the average of the highest 60 consecutive
months of an employees cash compensation, which includes
base salary and annual incentive cash compensation but it
excludes compensation under the LTIP. The benefits are not
subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset
amounts. Benefits from the plan are paid as a monthly
single-life annuity, or if married, actuarially-equivalent
50 percent, 75 percent or 100 percent joint and
survivor annuity options are also available. Survivor benefits
based on the 50 percent joint and survivor option will be
paid to an eligible spouse if the employee is a vested member in
the plan and dies before retirement.
22
The Companys unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan (SRP)
provides a retirement benefit to those affected by the maximum
benefit limitations permitted for qualified plans by the
Internal Revenue Code and to those deferring incentive
compensation bonuses. The benefit is equal to the amount of
normal pension benefit reduction resulting from the application
of maximum benefit and salary limitations and the exclusion of
deferred incentive compensation bonuses from the retirement plan
benefit formula. Benefits from the plan are paid as a lifetime
monthly annuity or a single lump sum distribution at the
executives election and will be made at the later of:
(1) termination of employment; (2) age 55 with
15 years of service or age 65, whichever occurs first;
or (3) twelve months from the date the payment election is
made. If the participant dies before the supplemental benefit
commencement date, the participants surviving spouse will
be eligible to receive a survivor pension for the amount by
which the total survivor pension benefit exceeds the surviving
spouses retirement plan benefit.
Normal retirement age under both plans is 65 and participants
may retire early between ages 55 and 65 if they have
15 years of service. For retirement at ages 55 through
61 with 15 years of service, pension benefits are reduced
four percent per year from age 65. For retirement at or
after age 62 with 15 years of service, there is no
reduction in retirement benefits. As of December 31, 2008,
T. E. Plimpton, J. G. Cardillo and D. D. Sobic are eligible for
a reduced early retirement benefit. M. A. Tembreull is eligible
for age 62 unreduced early retirement benefit.
The Pension Plan table shows the present value of the accrued
retirement benefits for the Named Executive Officers under the
Companys retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan
based on highest average salary and service as of
December 31, 2008. The retirement benefits were calculated
using the assumptions found in the Notes for Consolidated
Financial Statements under Note M of the Companys
2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Depending on executive recruitment considerations, additional
years of service may be offered to new executives.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The following table provides information about the deferred
compensation accounts of the Named Executive Officers as of
December 31, 2008. Amounts deferred reflect cash awards
payable in prior years but voluntarily deferred by the executive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contribution in
|
|
Earnings (Loss)
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
|
2008
|
|
in 2008
|
|
Distributions
|
|
12/31/2008 (a)
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
$
|
1,191,562
|
|
|
$
|
(3,270,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
4,336,322
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(2,955,512
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,217,140
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(56,749
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,252,505
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
147,478
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,610,610
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
To the extent required to be reported, all cash awards were
reported as compensation to the Named Executive Officer in the
Summary Compensation Table for previous years. |
The Companys DC Plan provides all eligible employees
including the Named Executive Officers an opportunity to
voluntarily defer all or part of the cash awards earned and
payable under the LTIP and the IC Plan. The Company makes no
contributions to the Plan.
A portion of the amount in the 2008 Aggregate Earnings column is
reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Named
Executive Officers as follows: M. C. Pigott $1,029; M. A.
Tembreull $21,928; T. E. Plimpton $19,624; and J. G. Cardillo
$13,072.
The Named Executive Officers have elected to defer into an
income account, a stock unit account or any combination of each.
Deferral elections were made in the year before the award was
payable. Cash awards
23
were credited to the income account as of January in the year
the award was payable and interest is compounded quarterly on
the account balance based on the simple combined average of
monthly Aa Industrial Bond Yield averages for the previous
quarter. The Named Executive Officer may elect to be paid out
the balance in the income account in a lump sum or in up to 15
substantially equal annual installments. Cash awards credited to
the stock unit account are based on the average closing price of
a share of the Companys common stock on the first five
trading days in January of the year the cash award was payable.
Dividend equivalents are credited to the stock unit account
based on the closing price of the Companys common stock on
the date the dividend is paid to stockholders. The stock unit
account is paid out in a single distribution of whole shares of
the Companys common stock.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The Named Executive Officers do not have severance or change in
control agreements with the Company. The information below
describes certain compensation that would become payable under
existing plans if each Named Executive Officers employment
terminated or a change in control occurred on December 31,
2008. These payments are in addition to deferred compensation
balances and the present value of accumulated Supplemental
Retirement Plan benefits reported in the Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation and Pension Benefits
tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Pigott
|
|
|
M. A. Tembreull
|
|
|
T. E. Plimpton
|
|
|
J. G. Cardillo
|
|
|
D. D. Sobic
|
|
|
Termination for Cause
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Termination Without Cause
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
573,750
|
|
|
|
451,633
|
|
|
|
301,183
|
|
|
|
196,563
|
|
Long-Term Performance Award
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,365,000
|
|
|
|
936,000
|
|
|
|
461,550
|
|
|
|
303,175
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
787,787
|
|
|
|
610,810
|
|
|
|
307,164
|
|
|
|
86,143
|
|
Total
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,726,537
|
|
|
|
1,998,443
|
|
|
|
1,069,897
|
|
|
|
585,881
|
|
Death
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
1,147,500
|
|
|
|
573,750
|
|
|
|
451,633
|
|
|
|
301,183
|
|
|
|
196,563
|
|
Long-Term Performance Award
|
|
|
5,021,875
|
|
|
|
2,248,333
|
|
|
|
1,554,000
|
|
|
|
808,050
|
|
|
|
534,175
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
8,300,578
|
|
|
|
787,787
|
|
|
|
610,810
|
|
|
|
307,164
|
|
|
|
86,143
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,469,953
|
|
|
|
3,609,870
|
|
|
|
2,616,443
|
|
|
|
1,416,397
|
|
|
|
816,881
|
|
Change in control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan
|
|
|
2,700,000
|
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
1,062,666
|
|
|
|
708,666
|
|
|
|
462,500
|
|
Long-Term Performance Award
|
|
|
7,700,000
|
|
|
|
3,446,667
|
|
|
|
2,388,000
|
|
|
|
1,203,000
|
|
|
|
797,000
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
8,300,578
|
|
|
|
787,787
|
|
|
|
610,810
|
|
|
|
307,164
|
|
|
|
86,143
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,700,578
|
|
|
|
5,584,454
|
|
|
|
4,061,476
|
|
|
|
2,218,830
|
|
|
|
1,345,643
|
|
Termination for Cause. If a Named Executive Officer had
been terminated for cause, as defined in the
Companys LTIP, all unpaid cash incentives under the IC
Plan and the LTIP, stock options (vested and unvested),
restricted stock, deferred compensation balances and accrued
Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits would have been
immediately forfeited.
Resignation or Termination without Cause. If a Named
Executive Officer had resigned or been terminated without cause,
all unpaid incentives under the IC Plan and the LTIP, unvested
stock options and restricted stock would have been immediately
forfeited. Vested stock options with expiration dates of
April 27, 2009, through January 15, 2014, would remain
exercisable for three months from the date of termination. All
other vested stock options would remain exercisable for one
month from the date of termination (expiration dates and number
of stock options are disclosed in the Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal Year-End table).
Deferred compensation balances, as described in the Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table, would be paid in a lump sum or in
installments according to the payment election filed by the
Named Executive Officer. The Named Executive Officer may elect
to have such payments made or commence in any January
24
that is at least 12 months from the date of such payment
election, but no later than the first January following the year
in which the executive attains
age 70-1/2.
Accrued Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits described under
the Pension Benefits Table would be paid in a form previously
elected by the Named Executive Officer. M. C. Pigott, T. E.
Plimpton and J. G. Cardillo would receive single lump-sum cash
payments and M. A. Tembreull and D. D. Sobic would receive
monthly annuities payable for life. If termination occurred on
December 31, 2008, these payments would be made or would
commence in accordance with the terms of the Plan on
January 1, 2009, for M. A. Tembreull, T. E. Plimpton, J. G.
Cardillo and D. D. Sobic. Payments for M. C. Pigott would begin
when first eligible to receive retirement benefits under the
qualified Retirement Plan.
Retirement. M. C. Pigott was not eligible to
receive retirement benefits on December 31, 2008 due to the
age threshold. Deferred compensation balances and accumulated
Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits would have been payable
for the other Named Executive Officers as described above under
Resignation or Termination without Cause
Annual incentive compensation earned in 2008 would have been
paid in the first quarter of 2009 and long-term incentive cash
awards earned under the
2006-2008
performance cycle would be paid in April 2009 based on actual
performance against goals. Unvested stock options would have
been immediately forfeited and vested stock options would have
remained exercisable for 12 months following the date of
retirement. All annual restricted stock would be immediately
vested.
Death. In the event of death on
December 31, 2008, beneficiaries of the Named Executive
Officers would have been entitled to receive all of the benefits
that would have been paid to a Named Executive Officer who had
retired on that date as described above, with the following
exceptions:
Long-term incentive cash awards earned under the
2007-2009
LTIP performance cycle and the
2008-2010
LTIP performance cycle would have been paid on a prorated basis
(2/3 and 1/3, respectively) following completion of the cycle,
based on actual performance against goals. Restricted stock
awarded under the share match program would vest following
completion of the cycle if the performance goal is achieved.
Change in control. Benefits payable in the
event of a change in control on December 31, 2008, are the
same as benefits payable in the event of death on the same date
(as described above) with the following exceptions:
Named Executive Officers would have been entitled to a maximum
IC award for 2008 (200 percent of target), a maximum
long-term incentive cash award under the
2006-2008
performance cycle of the LTIP and a maximum prorated award under
the
2007-2009
and the
2008-2010
performance cycles based on the number of full or partial months
completed in the performance cycle. The maximum payout amounts
are shown in the table above and would have been paid in a lump
sum immediately following the change in control. All restricted
stock would vest immediately.
Deferred compensation balances would have been paid as a single
lump sum in cash from the income account and whole
shares of the Companys common stock from the stock
account immediately following the change in control.
In addition, in the event of a change in control, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the
discretionary authority to provide the following additional
benefits:
1) Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options.
The value of unvested options that could have been immediately
vested upon a change in control on December 31, 2008 for
each Named Executive Officer was zero.
2) Increased Supplemental Retirement Benefits. If the
Committee chooses to terminate the Supplemental Retirement Plan
upon a change in control, the value of accrued benefits under
the plan would be paid in a single lump sum immediately
following the change in control. The additional Supplemental
Retirement Plan benefits that would have been paid had the plan
been terminated following a change in control on
December 31, 2008, are as follows: M. C. Pigott $7,475,779;
M. A. Tembreull $4,821,109; T. E. Plimpton
25
$2,799,510; J. G. Cardillo $799,524; D. D. Sobic $572,014. For
purposes of calculating the value of the benefit to be paid upon
such a plan termination, the normal actuarial factors and
assumptions used to determine Actuarial Equivalent
under the qualified retirement plan will be used with the
exception of the interest rate which will be zero percent.
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP performed the audit of the
Companys financial statements for 2008 and has been
selected to perform this function for 2009. Partners from the
Seattle office of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the
Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make statements
if they desire and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has furnished the
following report:
The Audit Committee is comprised of four members, each of whom
meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of
SEC and NASDAQ rules. It adopted a written charter outlining its
responsibilities that was approved by the Board of Directors. A
current copy of the Audit Committees charter is posted at
www.paccar.com/company/corporateresponsibility/auditcommittee.asp.
The Board of Directors designated John M. Fluke, Jr.,
as audit committee financial expert.
Among the Committees responsibilities is the selection and
evaluation of the independent auditors and the review of the
financial statements. The Committee reviewed and discussed the
audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent
fiscal year with management. In addition, the Committee
discussed under SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing
Standards, AU § 380) all matters required to be
discussed with the independent auditors Ernst & Young
LLP. The Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP the
written disclosures and letter required by the applicable
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding the independent accountants communications with
the audit committee concerning independence. Based on the Audit
Committees review of the audited financial statements and
its discussions with management and the independent auditors,
the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the
audited consolidated financial statements be included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Committee approved the engagement of the independent
auditors, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has
also adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all audit
and non-audit work performed by Ernst & Young, LLP.
The audit services engagement terms and fees and any changes to
them require Audit Committee preapproval. The Committee has also
preapproved the use of Ernst & Young for specific
categories of non-audit, audit-related and tax services up to a
specific annual limit. Any proposed services exceeding
preapproved limits require specific Audit Committee preapproval.
The Companys complete preapproval policy was attached to
the Companys 2004 proxy statement as Appendix E. The
Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the
non-audit services listed below is compatible with maintaining
the independence of Ernst and Young LLP. The services provided
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and December 31,
2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
$4.91
|
|
|
|
$4.86
|
|
Audit-Related
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
.31
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
.25
|
|
|
|
.26
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5.36
|
|
|
|
$5.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Audit
Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2008, the independent
auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, charged the Company
$4.91 million for professional services rendered for the
audit of the Companys annual financial statements included
in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
audit of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting, reviews of the financial
statements included in the Companys Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
and services provided in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings.
Audit-Related
Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2008, the independent
auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company
$.20 million for audit-related professional services. These
services include employee benefit plan (pension and 401(k))
audits and other assurance services not directly related to the
audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Tax
In the year ended December 31, 2008, the independent
auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company
$.25 million for tax services, which include fees for tax
return preparation for the Company, consulting on audits and
inquiries by taxing authorities and the effects that present and
future transactions may have on the Companys tax
liabilities.
All Other
Fees
In the year ended December 31, 2008, Ernst &
Young LLP was not engaged to perform professional services other
than those authorized above.
THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE
J. M. Fluke, Jr., Chairman
S. F. Page
W. G. Reed, Jr.
C. R. Williamson
27
STOCKHOLDER
RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change
in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Companys
common stock to the cumulative total return of the
Standard & Poors Composite 500 Stock Index and
the return of two industry peer groups of companies identified
in the graph (the Current Peer Group Index and the Prior Peer
Group Index) for the last five fiscal years ending
December 31, 2008. Effective January 1, 2008, the
Company revised its peer group to reflect changes in the
industry and to provide a more challenging and competitive group
against which to measure performance. Standard &
Poors has calculated a return for each company in both the
Current Peer Group Index and Prior Peer Group Index weighted
according to its respective capitalization at the beginning of
each period with dividends reinvested on a monthly basis.
Management believes that the identified companies and
methodology used in the graph for the peer group indices
provides a better comparison than other indices available. The
Current Peer Group Index consists of Caterpillar Inc., Cummins
Inc., Danaher Corporation, Deere & Company, Dover
Corporation, Eaton Corporation, Harley-Davidson, Inc., Honeywell
International Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., Ingersoll-Rand
Company Ltd. and United Technologies Corporation. The Prior Peer
Group consists of Arvin Meritor Inc., Caterpillar Inc., Cummins
Inc., Dana Corporation, Deere & Company, Eaton
Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Company Ltd., Navistar International
Corp. and Oshkosh Truck Corp. The comparison assumes that $100
was invested December 31, 2003 in the Companys common
stock and in the stated indices and assumes reinvestment of
dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
PACCAR Inc
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
147.13
|
|
|
|
|
131.80
|
|
|
|
|
193.77
|
|
|
|
|
251.52
|
|
|
|
|
134.92
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
110.88
|
|
|
|
|
116.33
|
|
|
|
|
134.70
|
|
|
|
|
142.10
|
|
|
|
|
89.53
|
|
Current Peer Group Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
116.59
|
|
|
|
|
121.11
|
|
|
|
|
142.74
|
|
|
|
|
183.05
|
|
|
|
|
107.86
|
|
Prior Peer Group Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
120.12
|
|
|
|
|
124.60
|
|
|
|
|
142.00
|
|
|
|
|
204.90
|
|
|
|
|
100.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
The Company has been advised that two stockholders intend to
present proposals at the Annual Meeting. The Company will
furnish the name, address and number of shares held by the
proponent of each of the following stockholder proposals upon
receipt of a request for such information to the Secretary.
In accordance with the proxy regulations, the following is the
complete text of each proposal exactly as submitted. The
stockholder proposals include some assertions the Company
believes are incorrect. The Company has not attempted to refute
all of these inaccuracies. The Company accepts no
responsibility for the proposals.
|
|
ITEM 2:
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSAL REGARDING THE ANNUAL ELECTION OF ALL
DIRECTORS
|
Resolved, shareowners ask that our Company take the
steps necessary to reorganize the Board of Directors into one
class with each director subject to election each year and to
complete this transition within one-year.
Supporting Statement. Our current practice, in which
only a few directors stand for election annually, is not in the
best interest of our Company and its stockholders. Eliminating
this staggered system would give stockholders an opportunity to
register their view on the performance of each director
annually. Electing directors in this manner is one of the best
methods available to stockholders to ensure that the Company
will be managed in a manner that is in the best interest of
stockholders.
The Council of Institutional Investors also recommends adoption
of annual election of each director. This proposal topic also
won strong support at the following companies in 2008:
|
|
|
Fortune Brands (FO)
|
|
74% Nick Rossi (Sponsor)
|
McGraw-Hill (MHP)
|
|
70% Nick Rossi
|
Eastman Chemical (EMN)
|
|
58% Ray T. Chevedden
|
The merits of this Elect Each Director Annually proposal should
be considered in the context of the need for improvements in our
companys corporate governance and in individual director
performance. For instance in 2008 the following governance and
performance issues were identified:
Our poison pill was set to expire on
February 19, 2009.
In 2002 and 2004 shareholders supported
redeeming our poison pill with more than a 48% vote. This
48%-vote is believed to indicate a significant margin of
majority support from independent shareholders.
The Corporate Library (TCL)
www.thecorporatelibrary.com, an independent investment
research firm, rated our company:
D in governance.
High Governance Risk Assessment.
Very High Concern in Takeover Defenses which makes
it difficult to replace underperforming directors.
Our directors needed only one-vote out of
365 million to be elected and then they were set for
3-years
Accountability concern.
We would have to marshal a 67% shareholder vote to
make certain governance improvements Entrenchment
concern.
With two insiders on the Board and an inside-related
director on the board (James Pigott) we did not even have an
Independent Chairman or a Lead Director.
James Pigott, with
36-years
tenure (independence concern), was 50% of our key Nomination
Committee
John Fluke, with
24-years
tenure (independence concern), was on our key audit and
executive pay committees.
We had no right to:
Cumulative voting.
To call a special meeting.
To act by written consent.
To vote on our auditors.
29
Our directors served on boards rated F
or D by The Corporate Library:
|
|
|
William Reed Washington Mutual (WM)
|
|
On PCAR audit committee
|
Robert Parry Countrywide Financial (CFC)
|
|
On PCAR executive pay committee
|
Robert Parry Janus Capital (JNS)
|
|
On PCAR executive pay committee
|
Our full Board met only 4-times in an entire
year Commitment concern.
The above concerns shows there is need for improvement. Please
encourage our board to respond positively to this proposal.
Elect Each Director Annually
Yes on 2
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RESPONSE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST ITEM 2
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
It is the Companys position that PACCAR has one of the
best qualified Board of Directors of any public company in the
United States. The impeccable integrity of Company management,
the consistency of superior stockholder returns, especially
compared to the Standard & Poors 500 Index, and
the quality and technology leadership displayed in its products
and processes are the result of a dedicated and proactive Board
of Directors. PACCAR has earned a net income for 70 consecutive
years and paid a dividend every year since 1941.
In 1986, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment
to the Companys Certificate of Incorporation to divide the
Board of Directors into three classes, with approximately
one-third of the directors elected each year for a three-year
term. More than 78 percent of the Companys
outstanding shares voted for this amendment. The Board continues
to believe that a classified board (that is, one where only a
portion of the board is elected each year) is in the best
interests of the stockholders. Currently, many corporations in
the Standard & Poors 500 have classified boards.
The majority of the Companys directors are independent of
the Company and are experienced, proven executives and leaders
who serve on the boards of other prominent corporations. An
experienced, knowledgeable Board of Directors is a tremendous
asset to the Company, ensuring that it is managed well and
profitably for the benefit of its stockholders. Since the
Companys classified Board of Directors was adopted
twenty-three years ago, the Company has grown significantly and
profitably.
A classified board structure provides continuity and stability
of leadership and policy because a majority of the directors at
any given time will have prior experience as directors of the
Company. Consequently, the Board has a solid knowledge of the
Company, a broader perspective on its operations, and a better
understanding of its future plans and opportunities. This
structure enables the directors to build on past experience for
more effective long-term strategic planning. This is
particularly important in a company like PACCAR that engages in
long-term investment programs.
Directors elected for staggered terms are equally accountable to
stockholders as directors elected annually. The Companys
classified Board reduces the vulnerability of the Company to
certain potentially abusive takeover tactics and encourages
potential acquirers to initiate arms-length negotiations with
management and seasoned directors. Because only one-third of the
directors are elected at any annual meeting of stockholders, it
is impossible to elect an entire new Board or even a majority of
the Board at a single meeting. Incumbent directors always
represent a majority of the Board and are in a position to
negotiate with the proponent of the change while protecting the
interests of all stockholders.
Approval of this proposal would not automatically result in a
change to the Board structure. Under Delaware law, to change the
structure of the Companys Board of Directors, the Board
must first authorize an amendment to the Companys
Certificate of Incorporation. The stockholders would then have
to approve that amendment with an affirmative vote of two-thirds
of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock.
30
The Board believes that a classified board is appropriate for
the Company and will serve and protect stockholders
interests successfully as it has for decades.
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
ITEM 2.
|
|
ITEM 3:
|
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSAL REGARDING A DIRECTOR VOTE THRESHOLD
|
Resolved: That the shareholders of PACCAR Inc.
(Company) hereby request that the Board of Directors
initiate the appropriate process to amend the Companys
corporate governance documents (articles or bylaws) to provide
that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote
of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of
shareholders, with a plurality vote standard retained for
contested director elections, that is, when the number of
director nominees exceeds the number of board seats.
Supporting Statement: In order to provide
shareholders a meaningful role in director elections, the
Companys director election vote standard should be changed
to a majority vote standard. A majority vote standard would
require that a nominee receive a majority of the votes cast in
order to be elected. The standard is particularly well-suited
for the vast majority of director elections in which only board
nominated candidates are on the ballot. We believe that a
majority vote standard in board elections would establish a
challenging vote standard for board nominees and improve the
performance of individual directors and entire boards. The
Company presently uses a plurality vote standard in all director
elections. Under the plurality standard, a board nominee can be
elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even if a
substantial majority of the votes cast are withheld
from the nominee.
In response to strong shareholder support for a majority vote
standard, a strong majority of the nations leading
companies, including Intel, General Electric, Motorola, Hewlett
Packard, Morgan Stanley, Home Depot, Gannett, Marathon Oil, and
Pfizer, have adopted a majority vote standard in company bylaws
or articles of incorporation. Additionally, these companies have
adopted director resignation policies in their bylaws or
corporate governance policies to address post-election issues
related to the status of director nominees that fail to win
election. Other companies have responded only partially to the
call for change by simply adopting post election director
resignation policies that set procedures for addressing the
status of director nominees that receive more
withhold votes than for votes. At the
time of this proposal submission, our Company and its board had
not taken either action.
We believe that a post election director resignation policy
without a majority vote standard in company governance documents
is an inadequate reform. The critical first step in establishing
a meaningful majority vote policy is the adoption of a majority
vote standard. With a majority vote standard in place, the board
can then take action to develop a post election procedure to
address the status of directors that fail to win election. A
majority vote standard combined with a post election director
resignation policy would establish a meaningful right for
shareholders to elect directors, and reserve for the board an
important post election role in determining the continued status
of an unelected director. We urge the Board to take this
important step of establishing a majority vote standard in the
Companys governance documents.
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RESPONSE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST ITEM 3
FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
One of the strengths of PACCAR is the continuity of vision and
quality performance that have resulted from the diligent and
positive manner in which the directors guide the Company. PACCAR
stockholders have benefited from the outstanding leadership the
Board of Directors has provided the Company for many years. The
Companys average annual total stockholder return for the
ten-year period ending December 31, 2008 is
17.6 percent compared with a 1.4 percent loss for the
Standard & Poors 500 Index.
31
The Company has an excellent history of electing Board
directors by a substantial majority.
|
|
|
|
|
For 20 consecutive years, over 88 percent of the
outstanding shares have been represented at the Companys
annual meeting.
|
|
|
|
Every director nominee has received an affirmative vote greater
than 87 percent of the shares voted through the plurality
process during the previous 20 years.
|
|
|
|
The Companys Nominating and Governance Committee has a
thorough and proven director selection process to identify
strong nominees committed to serving the Company and its
stockholders.
|
|
|
|
The Company has a governance policy that requires a director to
submit a resignation to the Board upon a change in principal
employment or responsibility. This policy provides additional
assurance that Board directors are of the highest caliber and
have the necessary time to serve stockholders during their term.
|
A plurality voting standard is an accepted method among
public companies and is the standard voting practice under the
laws of the State of Delaware.
|
|
|
|
|
The rules governing plurality voting are well understood by
stockholders. In plurality voting for the election of directors,
the nominees with the most votes are elected. By contrast, in a
majority voting system, the result is uncertain if none of the
director nominees receives a majority of the votes cast.
|
|
|
|
It is not in the best interest of the Company or its
stockholders to implement a majority vote system that lacks a
clear process for determining the outcome in a situation where
no nominee receives a majority of the votes cast.
|
|
|
|
The Companys stockholders rejected similar stockholder
proposals by a substantial margin in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
|
The Board believes electing directors under a plurality vote
process is best for the ongoing success of the Company and its
stockholders, but it will continue to review the majority vote
standard.
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST
ITEM 3.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 2010
A stockholder proposal must be addressed to the Corporate
Secretary and received at the principal executive offices of the
Company, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009, by
the close of business on November 12, 2009, to be
considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the
Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
For business to be brought before the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders by a stockholder, other than those proposals
included in the proxy materials, the Companys Bylaws (Art.
III, Section 5) provide that notice of such business
must be received at the Companys principal executive
offices not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to
the first anniversary of the prior years annual meeting.
The notice must specify the stockholders name, address and
number of shares of the Company beneficially owned, a
description of the desired business to be brought before the
annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at
the annual meeting and other information stated in the Bylaws.
The Companys Bylaws (Art. III,
Section 6) provide that nominations for director by a
stockholder must be received by the Corporate Secretary at the
Companys principal executive offices not less than 90 nor
more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the
prior years annual meeting. The notice must specify the
stockholders name, address and number of shares of the
Company beneficially owned, and it must specify certain
information relating to the nominee as required under the
Companys Bylaws and Regulation 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
A copy of the pertinent Bylaw provision is available on request
to the Corporate Secretary, PACCAR Inc, P.O. Box 1518,
Bellevue, Washington 98009.
32
OTHER
BUSINESS
The Company knows of no other business likely to be brought
before the meeting.
J. M. DAmato
Secretary
March 12, 2009
33
Directions to
Meydenbauer Center
|
|
|
|
Driving
Directions
|
|
|
Parking
|
From I-405 northbound or southbound take Exit 13A west (NE 4th Street westbound).
Turn right onto 112th Avenue NE (heading north).
Turn left onto NE 6th Street and proceed into the Meydenbauer Center parking garage entrance on the right.
|
|
|
Due to limited
parking availability and construction around Meydenbauer Center,
you are encouraged to explore Metro Transits commuter
services. The Bellevue Transit Center is located one block from
Meydenbauer Center.
Please visit www.meydenbauer.com for the latest
information on parking availability in and around Meydenbauer
Center.
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles with two or
more occupants may use the NE 6th Street HOV only off-
and on-ramps. Cross 112th Avenue NE and turn right into the
Meydenbauer Center parking garage.
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
10:30 a.m.
Meydenbauer Center
11100 N.E. 6th Street
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be
held on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. at Meydenbauer Center, Bellevue, Washington. The
proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available on the Companys website at
www.paccar.com/2009annualmeeting/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777 - 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004
|
|
proxy |
|
|
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on April 28, 2009.
The shares of common stock you hold of record on March 2, 2009, will be voted as you specify on the
reverse side.
If the proxy is signed and no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted FOR Item 1 and
AGAINST Items 2 and 3. By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Mark C.
Pigott, John M. Fluke, Jr., and each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote your shares
on the matters shown on the reverse side and to vote in their discretion on any other matters which
may properly come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments.
Shares credited to the undersigned in the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (SIP) will be voted by
the Trustee in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse. If no voting
instructions are received, the Trustee will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares with
respect to which it has received timely voting instructions by Members, as provided in the SIP.
See reverse for voting instructions.
Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named
proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you
marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNET www.eproxy.com/pcar
Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m. (CT) on
April 27, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
PHONE 1-800-560-1965
Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 12:00 p.m.
(CT) on April 27, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the
postage-paid envelope provided. |
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by
Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back the
proxy card.
TO VOTE BY MAIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS ON ALL ITEMS BELOW,
SIMPLY SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD.
ò Please detach here ò
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Item 1 and AGAINST Items 2 and 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of directors:
|
|
|
01 |
|
|
Mark C. Pigott
|
|
|
03 |
|
|
Warren R. Staley
|
|
o
|
|
Vote FOR
|
|
o
|
|
Vote WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
|
02 |
|
|
William G. Reed, Jr.
|
|
|
04 |
|
|
Charles R. Williamson
|
|
|
|
all nominees
|
|
|
|
from all nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(except as marked) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated nominee,
write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Stockholder proposal regarding the annual election of all directors
|
|
o For
|
|
o Against
|
|
o Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Stockholder proposal regarding a director vote threshold
|
|
o For
|
|
o Against
|
|
o Abstain |
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE
VOTED FOR ITEM 1 AND AGAINST ITEMS 2 AND 3.
Address Change? Mark Box o Indicate changes below:
Signature(s) in Box
Please sign exactly
as name(s) appears
in type. If shares
are held by joint
owners, all persons
should sign. When
acting as attorney,
executor,
administrator,
trustee, or
guardian, please
give full title as
such. If a
corporation, please
sign full corporate
name by president
or other authorized
officer. If a
partnership, please
sign partnership
name by authorized
person.