UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-32600
TUCOWS INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-2707366 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
96 Mowat Avenue,
Toronto, Ontario M6K 3M1, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(416) 535-0123
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T §232.405 of this chapter during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No x
As of May 14, 2010, there were 59,803,124 outstanding shares of common stock, no par value, of the registrant.
TUCOWS INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES AND SERVICE MARKS
Tucows®, Butterscotch® and OpenSRS® are registered trademarks of Tucows, Inc. or its subsidiaries. Other service marks, trademarks and trade names of Tucows, Inc. or its subsidiaries may be used in this Annual Report on From 10-K (the Annual Report). All other service marks, trademarks and trade names referred to in the Annual Report are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, any trademarks referred to in the Annual Report may appear without the ® or TM symbol, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we or the owner of such trademark, as applicable, will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our or its rights, or the right of the applicable licensor, to these trademarks.
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Tucows Inc.
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,181,896 |
|
$ |
9,632,394 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $110,000 as of March 31, 2010 and $110,000 as of December 31, 2009 |
|
3,697,545 |
|
2,822,045 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
2,860,624 |
|
2,498,922 |
|
||
Derivative instrument asset, current portion (note 6) |
|
2,185,688 |
|
2,107,825 |
|
||
Prepaid domain name registry and ancillary services fees, current portion |
|
33,750,000 |
|
31,596,236 |
|
||
Income taxes recoverable |
|
358,000 |
|
674,000 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
48,033,753 |
|
49,331,422 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Derivative instrument asset, long-term portion (note 6) |
|
140,913 |
|
112,553 |
|
||
Prepaid domain name registry and ancillary services fees, long-term portion |
|
12,588,320 |
|
12,126,515 |
|
||
Property and equipment |
|
1,779,999 |
|
1,986,768 |
|
||
Deferred financing charges |
|
33,600 |
|
41,000 |
|
||
Deferred tax asset, long-term portion (note 7) |
|
4,102,929 |
|
3,907,476 |
|
||
Intangible assets (note 4) |
|
18,213,439 |
|
18,656,353 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
17,990,807 |
|
17,990,807 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
102,883,760 |
|
$ |
104,152,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,738,878 |
|
$ |
1,547,863 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
1,763,176 |
|
1,889,980 |
|
||
Customer deposits |
|
3,895,116 |
|
3,624,317 |
|
||
Loan payable, current portion (note 5) |
|
2,741,564 |
|
3,220,125 |
|
||
Deferred revenue, current portion |
|
42,837,249 |
|
40,211,766 |
|
||
Accreditation fees payable, current portion |
|
594,968 |
|
530,656 |
|
||
Deferred tax liability, current portion (note 7) |
|
1,102,929 |
|
907,476 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
54,673,880 |
|
51,932,183 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Derivative instrument liability, long-term portion |
|
7,958 |
|
15,708 |
|
||
Deferred revenue, long-term portion |
|
16,677,922 |
|
16,098,812 |
|
||
Accreditation fees payable, long-term portion |
|
169,705 |
|
169,620 |
|
||
Deferred tax liability, long-term portion (note 7) |
|
4,840,000 |
|
4,840,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity (note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock - no par value, 1,250,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock - no par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 59,792,816 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 67,080,353 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
12,579,210 |
|
14,030,384 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
43,587,383 |
|
47,287,351 |
|
||
Deficit |
|
(29,652,298 |
) |
(30,221,164 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
26,514,295 |
|
31,096,571 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
102,883,760 |
|
$ |
104,152,894 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
Tucows Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net revenues (note 9) |
|
$ |
20,445,153 |
|
$ |
20,091,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of revenues (*) |
|
14,924,874 |
|
13,785,398 |
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
310,058 |
|
392,947 |
|
||
Amortization of intangible assets (note 4) |
|
74,802 |
|
29,199 |
|
||
Total cost of revenues (note 9) |
|
15,309,734 |
|
14,207,544 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
5,135,419 |
|
5,883,880 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sales and marketing (*) |
|
1,862,336 |
|
1,353,176 |
|
||
Technical operations and development (*) |
|
1,243,013 |
|
1,104,139 |
|
||
General and administrative (*) |
|
815,580 |
|
1,869,896 |
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
43,889 |
|
82,453 |
|
||
Amortization of intangible assets (note 4) |
|
360,540 |
|
360,540 |
|
||
Gain on change in fair value of forward exchange contracts |
|
(113,973 |
) |
(85,343 |
) |
||
Total expenses |
|
4,211,385 |
|
4,684,861 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from operations |
|
924,034 |
|
1,199,019 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other income : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income (expense), net |
|
(39,168 |
) |
(63,462 |
) |
||
Total other income |
|
(39,168 |
) |
(63,462 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
884,866 |
|
1,135,557 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for income taxes (note 7) |
|
316,000 |
|
107,425 |
|
||
Net income for the period |
|
$ |
568,866 |
|
$ |
1,028,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings per common share (note 8) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shares used in computing basic earnings per common share (note 8) |
|
61,265,903 |
|
72,655,213 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings per common share (note 8) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per common share (note 8) |
|
63,338,084 |
|
72,657,604 |
|
(*) Stock-based compensation has been included in expenses as follows:
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
3,628 |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
15,686 |
|
14,900 |
|
||
Technical operations and development |
|
14,581 |
|
10,600 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
22,734 |
|
18,700 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
Tucows Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income for the period |
|
$ |
568,866 |
|
$ |
1,028,132 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
353,947 |
|
475,400 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred financing charges |
|
7,400 |
|
10,400 |
|
||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
435,342 |
|
389,739 |
|
||
Disposal of domain names |
|
7,572 |
|
973 |
|
||
Unrealized gain in the fair value of forward exchange contracts |
|
(113,973 |
) |
(85,343 |
) |
||
Stock-based compensation |
|
56,629 |
|
49,200 |
|
||
Change in non-cash operating working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(875,500 |
) |
(516,993 |
) |
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
(361,702 |
) |
(578,568 |
) |
||
Prepaid fees for domain name registry and ancillary services fees |
|
(2,615,569 |
) |
(2,125,399 |
) |
||
Income tax recoverable |
|
316,000 |
|
85,182 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
186,569 |
|
(180,821 |
) |
||
Accrued liabilities |
|
(126,804 |
) |
128,773 |
|
||
Customer deposits |
|
270,799 |
|
(309,502 |
) |
||
Deferred revenue |
|
3,204,593 |
|
2,463,376 |
|
||
Accreditation fees payable |
|
64,397 |
|
78,607 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
1,378,566 |
|
913,156 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds received on exercise of stock options |
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
||
Repurchase of common stock |
|
(5,212,272 |
) |
(1,811,179 |
) |
||
Repayment of loan payable |
|
(478,561 |
) |
(478,561 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(5,686,332 |
) |
(2,289,740 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cost of domain names acquired |
|
|
|
(5,900 |
) |
||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(142,732 |
) |
(42,240 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(142,732 |
) |
(48,140 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(4,450,498 |
) |
(1,424,724 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
9,632,394 |
|
5,427,467 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
5,181,896 |
|
$ |
4,002,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
39,276 |
|
$ |
65,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment acquired during the period not yet paid for |
|
$ |
98,040 |
|
$ |
2,784 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY:
Tucows Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (referred to throughout this report as the Company, Tucows, we, us or through similar expressions), together with our consolidated subsidiaries, is a global distributor of Internet services, including domain name registration, security and identity products through digital certificates and email through its distribution network of Internet Service Providers, web hosting companies and other providers of Internet services to end-users.
We were incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in November 1992 under the name Infonautics, Inc. In August 2001, we completed our acquisition of Tucows Inc., a Delaware corporation, and we changed our name from Infonautics, Inc. to Tucows Inc. Our principal executive office is located in Toronto, Ontario and we have offices in the United Kingdom and the United States.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated balance sheets, and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of Tucows and its subsidiaries as at March 31, 2010 and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for future periods.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Tucows in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in the Companys annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been condensed or omitted. These interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes follow the same accounting policies and methods of application used in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Tucows 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded out-of-period adjustments relating to rent expense and the amortization of intangible assets. These immaterial corrections of errors reduced net income after taxes by $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The Company recognizes the effects of events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued (subsequent events) if there is evidence that conditions related to the subsequent event existed at the date of the balance sheet date, including the impact of such events on managements estimates and assumptions used in preparing the financial statements. Other significant subsequent events that are not recognized in the financial statements, if any, are disclosed to the notes to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
3. NEW ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic: 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. Update 2010-06 requires additional fair value disclosures for significant transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy and gross presentation of items within the Level 3 reconciliation. This guidance also clarifies that entities need to disclose fair value information for each class of asset and liability measured at fair value and that valuation techniques need to be provided for all non-market observable measurements. Our adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010, did not impact our Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company does not have any such transfers and no items classified as Level 3.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009, the SEC announced that public companies with a public float below $75 million must begin to comply with the final stage of Section 404 that requires auditor attestation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, beginning with annual reports for fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010. The previous effective date was for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009. As a result, the Company will now be required to provide the attestation reports commencing for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (Update 2009-13). Update 2009-13 applies to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements that are currently within the scope of FASB ASC Subtopic 605-25 (previously included in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue no. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). Update 2009-13 provides principles and application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. It also requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. The guidance eliminates the use of the residual method, requires entities to allocate revenue using the relative-selling-price method, and significantly expands the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. Update 2009-13 is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We are currently assessing the impact of Update 2009-13 on our future consolidated financial statements.
4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Intangible assets consist of acquired technology, brand, customer relationships, surname domain names and our portfolio of domain names. As reflected in the table below, these balances are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the intangible assets, except for the surname domain names and portfolio domain names; which have been determined to have an indefinite life and which are tested annually for impairment.
A summary of acquired intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
Technology |
|
Brand |
|
Customer |
|
Surname domain |
|
Direct navigation |
|
|
|
||||||
Amortization period |
|
2 - 7 years |
|
7 years |
|
4 - 7 years |
|
indefinite life |
|
indefinite life |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net book value, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
324,928 |
|
$ |
686,820 |
|
$ |
3,408,380 |
|
$ |
12,132,408 |
|
$ |
2,103,817 |
|
$ |
18,656,353 |
|
Sale of domain names |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
(6,923 |
) |
(7,572 |
) |
||||||
Amortization expense |
|
(74,802 |
) |
(41,760 |
) |
(318,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(435,342 |
) |
||||||
Net book value, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
250,126 |
|
$ |
645,060 |
|
$ |
3,089,600 |
|
$ |
12,131,759 |
|
$ |
2,096,894 |
|
$ |
18,213,439 |
|
5. LOAN PAYABLE:
The Company entered into a non-revolving, reducing credit facility in the amount of $9.6 million with a Canadian chartered bank (the credit facility) to finance the purchase of Innerwise, Inc. in July 2007. Effective February 23, 2009, the Company agreed to amend the interest rate payable from the banks US Base rate plus 0.50% per annum to the banks US Base rate plus 1.50% per annum. The principal and accrued interest on the loan is payable monthly over the term of the loan, which is five years. Tucows may prepay this loan in full or in part without any premium or penalty. The credit facility provides that we maintain certain financial and operating covenants which include, among other provisions, maintaining specific leverage and coverage ratios during the term of the loan. Certain covenants under the credit facility may limit the amount of our capital expenditures. The credit facility is collateralized by a first lien on, and pledge of, the majority of the Company and our subsidiaries present and future property and assets (subject to certain exclusions). As of March 31, 2010, the Company continued to comply with all covenants of the credit facility.
Pursuant to the terms of the credit facility, the Company is required to make an annual cash sweep payment based on excess cash flow as defined in the credit facility agreement, as well as monthly principal repayments of approximately $160,000. Based on the assessment of the audited results for its 2008 fiscal year, the Company made a cash sweep payment for its 2008 fiscal year amounting to $0.7 million, which was paid on May 1, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, The Company estimated that the cash sweep payment for its 2009 fiscal year, payable during the three months ending June 30, 2010, will repay in full the $2,741,564 outstanding balance of our non-revolving, reducing credit facility.
To estimate the fair value of the Companys loan payable under the credit facility, the Company uses interest rates that are currently available to the Company for issuance of loans on similar terms and remaining maturities. The estimated fair value of the Companys loan payable at March 31, 2010 was $2,749,897, compared to a carrying amount of $2,741,564 at March 31, 2010.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES:
The Company enters into foreign currency contracts to hedge a portion of the Companys expected Canadian dollar requirements. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of our foreign currency contracts at March 31, 2010 was a net unrealized gain of $2.3 million as compared to a net unrealized gain of $2.2 million at December 31, 2009. The net unrealized gain is a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the date the currency forward contracts were entered into and the valuation date at period end.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had the following outstanding forward exchange contracts to trade U.S. dollars in exchange for Canadian dollars:
|
|
Notional |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
||
|
|
amount of |
|
exchange rate of |
|
|
|
||
Maturity date |
|
U.S. dollars |
|
U.S. dollars |
|
Fair value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
April - June 2010 |
|
$ |
4,939,000 |
|
0.8427 |
|
$ |
834,551 |
|
July - September 2010 |
|
5,400,000 |
|
0.8596 |
|
785,784 |
|
||
October - December 2010 |
|
5,400,000 |
|
0.9236 |
|
350,015 |
|
||
2010 |
|
15,739,000 |
|
0.8749 |
|
1,970,350 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
January March, 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9302 |
|
215,338 |
|
||
April - June 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9635 |
|
64,335 |
|
||
July - September 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9604 |
|
68,620 |
|
||
2011 |
|
11,700,000 |
|
0.9511 |
|
348,293 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
27,439,000 |
|
0.9058 |
|
$ |
2,318,643 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge a portion of our 2011 fiscal year expected Canadian dollar requirements. These contracts, collectively, have a notional value of US$6.5 million, whereby US$650,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis from May 2011 to September 2011 at an average foreign exchange rate of US$1.00: Cdn$1.0390.
The Company does not apply hedge accounting and, therefore, for the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $113,973 in the fair value of forward contracts in its consolidated statements of operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a gain on forward contracts of $85,343.
7. INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $316,000 on income before income taxes of $885,000 using an estimated effective tax rate for its 2010 fiscal year. Comparatively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a current tax expense of $107,000 on income before income taxes of $1.1 million using an estimated effective tax rate for its 2009 fiscal year that accounts for the utilization of remaining net operating loss carry forwards and alternative minimum tax credits available to the Company.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $4.3 million and a net deferred tax asset of $3.0 million. As of March 31, 2010 the Company has recorded a non-current deferred tax asset of $4.1 million and current deferred tax liabilities of $1.1 million. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has also recorded a non current deferred tax liability related to the temporary difference arising on indefinite life intangibles of $4.8 million.
The Company analyzes the carrying value of its deferred tax asset on a regular basis. In determining future taxable income, assumptions are made to forecast federal, state and international operating income, the reversal of temporary timing differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. The assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with other forecasts used to manage the business. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, there was no reversal of the valuation allowance. The valuation allowance will be maintained until sufficient evidence exists to support a reversal of, or decrease in, the valuation allowance.
The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes to account for income tax exposures. The application of this interpretation requires a two-step process that separates recognition of uncertain tax benefits from measurement thereof.
The Company has approximately $107,000 of total gross unrecognized tax benefit as of March 31, 2010 and $124,000 of total gross unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2009, which if recognized would favorably affect our income tax rate in future periods. The unrecognized tax benefit relates to prior year Pennsylvania state franchise taxes, other US state taxes. The unrecognized tax benefit has decreased by $17,000 when compared to the gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 we have now settled the claim for the Pennsylvania franchise taxes for the years December 31, 1996 to December 31, 2000. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefit for the 2009 and 2010 research and
development claim to be significant. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to taxes in tax expense. The Company did not have significant interest and penalties accrued as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively. The Company believes it is reasonably possible that $107,000 of the unrecognized tax benefit will decrease in the next twelve months as it is anticipated that the U.S. tax authorities will finalize their review of prior taxes owing in Pennsylvania within the period and certain other prior year state tax returns will be filed.
8. BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic earnings per common share has been calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share has been calculated by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. In computing diluted earnings per share, the treasury stock method is used to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the conversion of common shares equivalents or the proceeds of option exercises.
The following table is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income for the period |
|
$ |
568,866 |
|
$ |
1,028,132 |
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
61,265,903 |
|
72,655,213 |
|
||
Effect of outstanding stock options |
|
2,072,181 |
|
2,391 |
|
||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
63,338,084 |
|
72,657,604 |
|
||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, options to purchase 1,374,967 common shares that were outstanding, and were not included in the computation of diluted income per common share because all such options had exercise prices greater than the average market price of the common shares. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, options to purchase 7,167,669 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted income per common share because all such options had exercise prices greater than the average market price of the common shares.
On January 13, 2010, 6,341,470 common shares were repurchased and cancelled under the terms of a modified Dutch auction tender offer.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 an additional 956,000 common shares were repurchased and cancelled under the terms of our stock repurchase program announced in February 2010.
These reductions in the number of shares outstanding have been included in the computation of earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010(see note 11).
9. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
(a) The following is a summary of the Companys revenue earned from each significant revenue stream:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Domain Services |
|
$ |
15,403,010 |
|
$ |
14,202,023 |
|
Email Services |
|
638,188 |
|
1,121,935 |
|
||
Other Services |
|
1,093,711 |
|
1,094,460 |
|
||
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
17,134,909 |
|
16,418,418 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
YummyNames |
|
1,711,321 |
|
1,865,033 |
|
||
Hover |
|
1,129,497 |
|
1,300,584 |
|
||
Butterscotch |
|
469,426 |
|
507,389 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
20,445,153 |
|
$ |
20,091,424 |
|
No customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or the three months ended March 31, 2009. Significant management judgment is required at the time of recording of revenue to assess whether the collection of the resulting receivables is reasonably assured. On an ongoing basis, we assess the ability of our customers to make required payments. Based on this assessment, we expect the carrying amount of our outstanding receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, to be fully collected.
As of March 31, 2010, two customers accounted for 32% of accounts receivable, all of which has been paid subsequent to March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2009, no customer accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivable.
(b) The following is a summary of the Companys cost of revenues from each significant revenue stream:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Domain Services |
|
$ |
12,616,231 |
|
$ |
11,354,762 |
|
Email Services |
|
107,138 |
|
179,918 |
|
||
Other Services |
|
387,123 |
|
388,852 |
|
||
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
13,110,492 |
|
11,923,532 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
YummyNames |
|
202,754 |
|
185,554 |
|
||
Hover |
|
399,445 |
|
513,210 |
|
||
Butterscotch |
|
18,859 |
|
6,740 |
|
||
Network, other costs |
|
1,193,324 |
|
1,156,362 |
|
||
Network, depreciation and amortization costs |
|
384,860 |
|
422,146 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
15,309,734 |
|
$ |
14,207,544 |
|
(c) The following is a summary of the Companys property and equipment by geographic region:
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Canada |
|
$ |
1,348,232 |
|
$ |
1,475,056 |
|
United States |
|
428,314 |
|
506,533 |
|
||
United Kingdom |
|
3,453 |
|
5,179 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
1,779,999 |
|
$ |
1,986,768 |
|
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
The Company is involved in various legal claims and lawsuits in connection with its ordinary business operations. The Company intends to vigorously defend these claims. While the final outcome with respect to any actions or claims outstanding or pending as of March 31, 2010 cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that their resolution will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
The following unaudited table summarizes stockholders equity transactions for the period ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
Common stock |
|
paid in |
|
|
|
stockholders |
|
||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Amount |
|
capital |
|
Deficit |
|
equity |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balances, December 31, 2009 |
|
67,080,353 |
|
$ |
14,030,384 |
|
$ |
47,287,351 |
|
$ |
(30,221,164 |
) |
$ |
31,096,571 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
10,433 |
|
8,320 |
|
(3,819 |
) |
|
|
4,501 |
|
||||
Repurchase and retirement of shares Dutch Auction |
|
(6,341,470 |
) |
(1,268,294 |
) |
(3,222,692 |
) |
|
|
(4,490,986 |
) |
||||
Repurchase and retirement of shares Normal course issuer bid |
|
(956,000 |
) |
(191,200 |
) |
(530,086 |
) |
|
|
(721,286 |
) |
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
56,629 |
|
|
|
56,629 |
|
||||
Cancellation of restricted stock |
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568,866 |
|
568,866 |
|
||||
Balances, March 31, 2010 |
|
59,792,816 |
|
$ |
12,579,210 |
|
$ |
43,587,383 |
|
$ |
(29,652,298 |
) |
$ |
26,514,295 |
|
The following unaudited table summarizes stockholders equity transactions for the period ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
Common stock |
|
paid in |
|
|
|
stockholders |
|
||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Amount |
|
capital |
|
Deficit |
|
equity |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balances, December 31, 2008 |
|
73,073,782 |
|
$ |
15,198,358 |
|
$ |
48,714,676 |
|
$ |
(42,462,370 |
) |
$ |
21,450,664 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of shares |
|
(4,185,690 |
) |
(837,138 |
) |
(974,041 |
) |
|
|
(1,811,179 |
) |
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
49,200 |
|
|
|
49,200 |
|
||||
Net income for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,028,132 |
|
1,028,132 |
|
||||
Balances, March 31, 2009 |
|
68,888,092 |
|
$ |
14,361,220 |
|
$ |
47,789,835 |
|
$ |
(41,434,238 |
) |
$ |
20,716,817 |
|
On January 13, 2010, the Company announced that it successfully concluded a modified Dutch auction tender offer that was previously announced on December 14, 2009. Under the terms of the offer, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 6,341,470 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.70 per share, for a total of $4,439,029, excluding transaction costs of $51,957. The purchase price was funded from available cash. Of the 6,341,470 shares purchased, 5,000,000 were shares the Company offered to purchase in the offer and 1,341,470 where shares purchased pursuant to the Companys right to purchase up to an additional 2% of the shares outstanding immediately prior to the commencement of the tender offer. Due to over-subscription, the final proration factor for shares tendered at or below $0.70 per share was approximately 99.9%. For this purpose, shares tendered at $0.70 per share included shares tendered by those persons who indicated, in their letter of transmittal, that they were willing to accept the price determined in the offer. All shares purchased in the tender offer received the same price.
On February 16, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10 million of the Companys common stock at the Companys discretion. The Company has repurchased 956,000 shares under this repurchase program during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
12. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
(a) Stock options
The Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan) was established for the benefit of the employees, officers, directors and certain consultants of the Company. The maximum number of common shares which may be set aside for issuance under the 1996 Plan was 11,150,000 shares, provided that the Board of Directors of the Company has the right, from time to time, to increase such number subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company when required by law or regulatory authority. Generally, options issued under the 1996 Plan vest over a four-year period. The 1996 Plan expired on February 25, 2006 and no options have been issued from the 1996 Plan after that date.
On November 22, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved the implementation of the Companys 2006 Equity Compensation Plan (the 2006 Plan), which serves as a successor to the 1996 Plan. The 2006 Plan has been established for the benefit of the employees, officers, directors and certain consultants of the Company. The 5,000,000 common shares that have been set aside for issuance under the 2006 Plan are to provide eligible persons with the opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest, or otherwise increase their proprietary interest, in Tucows. Generally, options issued under the 2006 Plan vest over a four-year period and have a term not exceeding seven years.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, consistent with the guidance on stock compensation. Because option-pricing models require the use of subjective assumptions, changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options. The assumptions presented in the table below represent the weighted average of the applicable assumption used to value stock options at their grant date. The Company calculates expected volatility based on historical volatility of the Companys common shares. The expected term, which represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated based on historical exercise experience. The Company evaluated historical exercise behavior when determining the expected term assumptions. The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The Company determines the expected dividend yield percentage by dividing the expected annual dividend by the market price of our common shares at the date of grant.
No stock options were granted during the periods ended March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009.
Details of stock option transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
Three
months ended |
|
Three
months ended |
|
||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
||
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
7,203,977 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
7,282,777 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(10,433 |
) |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
(15,000 |
) |
0.64 |
|
(155,718 |
) |
0.53 |
|
||
Expired |
|
(383,374 |
) |
0.98 |
|
(1,500 |
) |
3.75 |
|
||
Outstanding, end of period |
|
6,795,170 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
7,125,559 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Options exercisable, end of period |
|
5,942,169 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
5,763,923 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
The stock options expire on various dates through 2016.
As of March 31, 2010, the exercise prices, weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding options and intrinsic values were as follows:
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
Options exercisable |
|
||||||||||||||
Exercise price |
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
||||
$0.31-$0.49 |
|
3,717,249 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
3.3 |
|
$ |
1,218,892 |
|
3,717,249 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
1,218,892 |
|
$0.56-$0.69 |
|
1,806,704 |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
4.7 |
|
210,927 |
|
1,189,704 |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
147,557 |
|
||
$0.80-$0.99 |
|
1,262,500 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1,026,500 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
||
$2.21-$4.84 |
|
8,717 |
|
$ |
4.32 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
8,716 |
|
$ |
4.32 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
6,795,170 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,429,819 |
|
5,942,169 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
1,366,449 |
|
Total unrecognized compensation cost relating to unvested stock options at March 31, 2010, prior to the consideration of expected forfeitures, was approximately $272,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
The Company recorded stock-based compensation of $56,436 and $49,200 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company has not capitalized any share-based compensation expense as part of the cost of an asset.
(b) Restricted stock awards
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, no restricted stock awards were granted to any employees of the Company.
Restricted stock awards generally vest annually over a four year period. Holders of restricted stock may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of an unvested stock. Unvested shares of restricted stock are held in escrow by the Company until the holders interest in such shares vests.
Holders of restricted stock shall have full shareholder rights with respect to any shares of Company stock issued to the participant under a stock award, whether or not the holders interest in those shares is vested. Accordingly, the holder shall have the right to vote such shares and to receive any regular cash dividends paid on such shares.
Total unrecognized compensation cost relating to unvested restricted stock awards at March 31, 2010, prior to the consideration of expected forfeitures, was approximately $3,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years.
The Company recorded stock-based compensation associated with restricted stock awards of $193 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Companys own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of the Companys derivative instrument assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010:
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Assets at |
|
||||||||
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative instrument asset |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,326,601 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,326,601 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,326,601 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,326,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative instrument liability |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(7,958 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(7,958 |
) |
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(7,958 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(7,958 |
) |
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of the Companys derivative instrument assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as at December 31, 2009:
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Assets at |
|
||||||||
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative instrument asset |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,220,378 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,220,378 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,220,378 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,220,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative instrument liability |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,708 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,708 |
) |
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,708 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(15,708 |
) |
14. RECLASSIFICATION
Certain of the prior periods comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in the current period.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements by us with regard to our expectations as to financial results and other aspects of our business that involve risks and uncertainties and may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as may, should, anticipate, believe, plan, estimate, expect and intend, and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include statements regarding, among other things, the Companys foreign currency requirements, specifically for the Canadian dollar; the estimated annual cash sweep payment due under the Companys credit facility; the number of new, renewed and transferred-in domain names, our valuations of certain deferred tax assets, our expectation to collect our outstanding receivables, net of our allowance for doubtful accounts; the potential impact of current and pending claims on our business; our expectation regarding fluctuations in certain expense and cost categories; our belief that the market for domain name registration will trend upward gradually and may be affected by market volatility; our belief that a slowing economy may lead to a decrease in advertising spending and the effect of changes in our contractual relationships on our revenue These statements are based on managements current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Many factors affect our ability to achieve our objectives and to successfully develop and commercialize our services including:
· Our ability to continue to generate sufficient working capital to meet our operating requirements;
· Our ability to maintain a good working relationship with our vendors and customers;
· The ability of vendors to continue to supply our needs;
· Actions by our competitors;
· Our ability to achieve gross profit margins at which we can be profitable;
· Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in our business;
· Our ability to effectively manage our business;
· Our ability to obtain and maintain approvals from regulatory authorities on regulatory issues;
· Pending or new litigation; and
· Factors set forth under the caption Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
This list of factors that may affect our future performance and financial and competitive position and also the accuracy of forward-looking statements is illustrative, but it is by no means exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us as of the date of this document, and we assume no obligation to update these cautionary statements or any forward-looking statements except to the extent of any obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933. These statements are not guarantees of future performance.
We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q by the foregoing cautionary statements.
OVERVIEW
Our mission is to provide simple, useful services that help people unlock the power of the Internet. We accomplish this by reducing the complexity our customers experience as they acquire, deliver or use Internet services such as domain name registration, email and other Internet services.
Our primary distribution channel is a global network of more than 10,000 resellers in more than 100 countries who typically provide their customers, the end-users of the Internet, with a critical component for establishing and maintaining an online presence. Our primary focus is serving the needs of this network of resellers by providing superior services, easy-to-use interfaces, proactive and attentive customer service, reseller-oriented technology and agile design and development processes. We seek to provide superior customer service to our resellers by anticipating their business needs and technical
requirements. This includes providing easy-to-use interfaces that enable resellers to quickly and easily integrate our services into their individual business processes, and offering brandable end-user interfaces that emphasize simplicity and visual appeal. We also provide second tier support to our resellers by email and phone in the event resellers experience issues or problems with our services. In addition, our Network Operating Center provides proactive support to our resellers by monitoring all services and network infrastructure to address deficiencies before customer services are impacted.
We believe that the underlying platforms for our services are one of the most mature, reliable and functional reseller-oriented provisioning and management platforms in our industry, and we continue to refine, evolve and improve these services for both resellers and end-users.
To assist us in forecasting growth and to help us monitor the effectiveness of our operational strategies, we categorize our revenue into the following services:
OpenSRS, our wholesale service, manages over ten million domain names, under its ICANN accreditation, as well as names Tucows manages for other registrars under their own accreditations, millions of mailboxes and tens of thousands of digital certificates through a network of over 10,000 web hosts, Internet service providers, or ISPs, and other resellers around the world.
Platypus, our billing service, provides ISPs with an industry-specific solution for billing, service provisioning and customer account management.
Hover, our retail service, offers services similar to those of OpenSRS to consumers and small businesses.
YummyNames, our domain portfolio service, manages tens of thousands of domain names, most of which generate advertising revenue and many of which we offer for resale via our reseller network and other channels. Included in the YummyNames domain portfolio are over 41,000 domains that allow over two-thirds of Americans to purchase a domain or email address based on their name.
Butterscotch, our content service, operates two advertising-supported websites, butterscotch.com and tucows.com, which provide content to help consumers overcome the complexity of modern technology and the Internet, in the form of over 2,600 videos and over 170,000 software and mobile listings and articles. Additionally, Butterscotch provides custom video production services for technology manufacturers and ISPs.
We periodically acquire companies or technology when we determine that the related products or technology are strategic or complementary to our current or future service offerings, as opportunities arise. For example:
· On July 25, 2007, we acquired Innerwise, Inc., or IYD, a privately held ICANN accredited registrar offering domain services through a worldwide wholesale affiliate network.
· On June 19, 2006, we acquired Mailbank.com, Inc. (doing business as NetIdentity). We use the assets from this acquisition to offer personalized Internet services directly to end-users through Hover and to resellers through OpenSRS Personal Names Service, as well as to generate income from the parked page of each domain address.
· On January 3, 2006, we acquired all of the Hosted Messaging assets of Critical Path, Inc. to expand our presence in the email market.
Our business model is characterized by non-refundable, up-front payments, which lead to recurring revenue and positive operating cash flow. We are an ICANN-accredited registrar and manage over ten million domains under our ICANN accreditation, as well as names we manage for other registrars under their own accreditations.
Net Revenues
OpenSRS
We derive revenue from our reseller network by providing them with reseller services that comprise (a) domain services, (b) email services and (c) other services. Other services primarily consist of secure sockets layer, or SSL, certificates and also include blogware and website building tools that are used by our resellers to create bundles of Internet services for their end-users along with billing solutions for ISPs.
OpenSRS Domain Service
Historically, our OpenSRS domain services has constituted the largest portion of our business and encompasses all of our services as an accredited registrar related to the registration, renewal, transfer and management of domain names. In addition, this service fuels other revenue categories as it often is the initial service for which a customer will engage us, enabling us to follow on with other services and allowing us to add to our domain portfolio by purchasing names registered through us upon their expiration. We also provide resellers with the ability to sell personal names. This service allows resellers the opportunity to sell email addresses based on our domain portfolio of surname domain names.
As of March 31, 2010, we offer registration services for the gTLDs .com, .net, .org, .info, ..name, .biz, .tel, .mobi and .asia and for the country code top-level domains, or ccTLDs .at, .be, .bz, .ca, .cc, .ch, .cn, .de, .dk, .es, .eu, .fr, .in, .it, ..li,.me, .mx .nl, .tv, .uk, .ws, and .us.
With respect to the sale of domain registrations, we modified our pricing structure for domain names to provide greater visibility into the various fees that make up the cost of a domain name, by breaking out the cost of the registry and ICANN fees separately from our management fee. In October 2007 and October 2008, registry fees were increased by 7% respectively by the major gTLD registries. Effective July 2010, registry fees for the .com and .net registrations will increase by an additional 7%. The management fee provides our resellers with access to our provisioning and management tools to enable them to register and administer domain names and access to additional services like WHOIS privacy and DNS services, enhanced domain name suggestion tools and access to our Premium Domain name services. We earn fees in connection with each new, renewed and transferred-in registration and from providing provisioning services to resellers and registrars on a monthly basis. Domain registrations are generally purchased for terms of one to ten years, with a majority having a one-year term. Except for certain large customers with whom we have negotiated alternative arrangements, payments for the full term of service, or billed revenue, is received at the time of activation of service. All fees received in connection with domain name registration are non-refundable, and where appropriate, are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
OpenSRS Email Service
We derive revenue from our hosted email service through our global distribution network. Our email service is offered on a per account, per month basis, and provides resellers with a reliable, scalable white label hosted email solutions that can be customized to their branding and business model requirements. The email service also includes spam and virus filtering on all accounts. End-users can access the email service via a full-featured, multi-language AJAX-enabled web interface, a WAP mobile interface, or through traditional desktop email clients, such as Microsoft Outlook or Apple Mail, using IMAP or POP/SMTP and 2GB of email storage.
We earn fees for email services when such services are activated. Email services are generally purchased monthly and, at month-end, are either deducted on a pre-authorized basis from resellers deposit account, or are invoiced.
Other OpenSRS Services
We derive revenue from other services primarily from provisioning SSL certificates. In addition, we provision blogware and website building tools that are used by our resellers to create bundles of Internet services for their end-users, as well as the provision of billing, provisioning and customer care software solutions to ISPs through our Platypus billing software.
We earn fees from such services when a service is activated. These services are generally purchased for terms of one month to three years. Platypus software is generally purchased for terms of one month to one year. Payments for services are for the full term of all services at the time of activation of service, are non-refundable and, where appropriate, are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as earned ratably over the service term. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
YummyNames
We derive revenue from our portfolio of domain names by displaying advertising on the domains and by making them available for sale or lease. In addition we display advertising on parked pages within OpenSRS. Parked pages are domain names registered with us that do not yet contain an active website. When a user types one of these domain names into a web browser, they are presented with dynamically generated links that are pay-per-click advertising. Every time a user clicks on one of these links, it generates revenue for us through our partnership with third-parties who provide syndicated pay-per-click advertising.
Portfolio names are sold through our premium domain name service, auctions or in negotiated sales. The size of our domain name portfolio varies over time, as we acquire and sell domains on a regular basis to maximize the overall value and revenue generation potential of our portfolio. In evaluating names for sale, we consider the potential foregone revenue from pay-per-click advertising, as well as other factors. The name will be offered for sale if, based on our evaluation, the name is deemed non-essential to our business and management believes that deriving proceeds from the sale is strategically more beneficial to the Company.
Portfolio names that have been acquired from third-parties or through acquisition are included as intangible assets with indefinite lives on our consolidated balance sheet.
In addition, we also offer the same services to our customers, allowing them to make available names registered by them for monetization on a similar basis. For customer names, we earn a referral fee for premium names or names sold or leased, and participate on a revenue share basis for names offered through our pay-per-click advertising program.
We recognize revenue from these services, net of any fees payable to resellers or customers, immediately upon completion of the service, or in the case of advertising revenue, on a monthly basis once the advertising has been served.
Hover
We derive revenues from the providing and managing Internet services, on a retail basis, to consumers and small businesses through our Hover.com website. These services include domain registration and other Internet services such as email and personalized email through our portfolio of surname-based domain names, as well as an easy-to-use interface that allows users to connect domain names to websites and email addresses through a unique DNS forwarding system. Depending on the service offered, we typically receive fees for our services.
Our customers generally purchase services for terms of one to ten years, with a majority of services purchased for a one-year term. Certain services are also offered on a monthly basis. Payments for the full term of all services, or billed revenue, are received at the time of service activation and, where appropriate, are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during quarterly and annual periods.
Butterscotch
We also generate advertising and other revenue through two ad-supported content sites, butterscotch.com and tucows.com.
Butterscotch.com derives revenue from banner and text advertising on the site, as well as from video advertising and product placement within the videos that make up the bulk of the site. In addition, revenue is earned through custom video production for technology manufacturers and Internet services customers.
Tucows.com advertising revenue is generated from third-party advertisers and from software developers who rely on us as a primary source of distribution. Software developers use our Author Resource Center to submit their products for inclusion on our site and to purchase promotional placement of their software. Software developers may also purchase other promotional services on a cost-per-click or flat rate basis. Software developers are able to promote their software through advertising services including keyword search placements, banners, promotional placements, expedited reviews and premium data services. Revenue is also generated from companies that contract with us to provide them with co-branded content.
Advertising and other revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which it is presented. To the extent that we do not meet the minimum number of post-presentation impressions that we guarantee to customers, we defer recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impressions are achieved. Custom video production revenue is recognized on acceptance of the completed video by the customer.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies and methods. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties made by management that may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, or Fiscal
2009, includes further information on the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the application of these estimates, including those related to the useful lives and valuation of intangible assets, valuation of goodwill, fair value measurement of assets and liabilities, product development costs, revenue recognition and deferred revenue and accounting for income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates.
Revenue recognition policy
We earn revenues from the following services;
· OpenSRS (Domain, Email and Other Services);
· YummyNames;
· Hover; and
· Butterscotch.
With respect to the sale of domain registrations and other Internet services, we earn registration fees in connection with each new, renewed and transferred-in registration and from providing provisioning services to resellers and registrars on a monthly basis. We also enter into revenue arrangements in which a reseller may purchase a combination of services (multiple element arrangements). When fair value exists for all elements, we allocate revenue to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. Fair value is established by the price charged when that element is sold separately. For arrangements where fair value exists only for the undelivered elements, we defer the fair value of the undelivered elements and recognize the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered items as revenue related to the delivered items, assuming all other criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Payments for the full term of all services, or billed revenue, are received at the time of activation of service and where appropriate are recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as earned ratably over the term of provision of service. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the quarters and the year.
Revenue from the sale of domain names consists primarily of amounts earned for the transfer of rights to domain names that are currently under the Companys control. Collectability of revenues generated is subject to a high level of uncertainty; accordingly revenues are recognized only when payment is received, except where a fixed contract has been negotiated, in which case revenues are recognized once all the terms of the contract have been satisfied.
We also generate advertising and other revenue through our online libraries of shareware, freeware and online services presented at our websites, tucows.com and butterscotch.com. Advertising and other revenue is recognized ratably over the period in which it is presented. To the extent that the minimum number of post-presentation impressions we guarantee to customers is not met, we defer recognition of the corresponding revenues until the guaranteed impressions are achieved. Custom video production revenue is recognized on acceptance of the completed video by the customer.
Changes to contractual relationships in the future could impact the amounts and timing of revenue recognition.
In those cases where payment is not received at the time of sale, additional conditions for recognition of revenue apply. The conditions are (i) that the collection of sales proceeds is reasonably assured and (ii) that we have no further performance obligations. We record expected refunds, rebates and credit card charge-backs as a reduction of revenues at the time of the sale based on historical experiences and current expectations. Should these expectations not be met, adjustments will be required in future periods.
We establish reserves for possible uncollectible accounts receivable and other contingent liabilities which may arise in the normal course of business. The allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated by taking into account factors such as our historical collection and write-off experience, the number of days the customer is past due and the status of the customers
account with respect to whether or not the customer is continuing to receive service. The contingent liability estimates are based on managements historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the reported amounts of liabilities and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Historically, credit losses have been within our expectations and the reserves we have established have been appropriate. However, we have, on occasion, experienced issues which have led to accounts receivable not being fully collected. Should these issues occur more frequently, additional reserves may be required.
Valuation of intangible assets, goodwill and long-lived assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired in business combinations. Intangible assets consist of acquired technology, brand, customer relationships, non-competition agreements, surname domain names and direct navigation domain names. Intangible assets, which include technology, brand value, customer relationships and non-competition arrangements related to the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation in April 2004, the acquisition of the Hosted Messaging Business of Critical Path, Inc. in January 2006, the acquisition of Mailbank.com Inc. in June 2006 and the acquisition of Innerwise, Inc. in July 2007, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of two to seven years.
Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles are not be amortized, but are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to carrying amount. Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles are tested for impairment annually at the same time every year, and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that impairment may exist. We review goodwill and indefinite life intangibles at least annually for possible impairment in the fourth quarter of each year.
We have other finite life intangible assets consisting of patented and non-patented technologies. These intangible assets are amortized over their expected economic lives. The lives are determined based upon the expected use of the asset, the estimated average life of the replacement parts of the reporting units products, the stability of the industry, expected changes in and replacement value of distribution networks and other factors deemed appropriate.
With regards to property, equipment and definite life intangible assets, we continually evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful lives of its definite-life intangible assets may warrant revision or that the remaining balance of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the asset in measuring whether the asset is recoverable. There was no impairment recorded on definite-life intangible assets and property and equipment during the three months ended March 31, 2010 or during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Determining the number of reporting units and the fair value of a reporting unit requires us to make judgments and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions, and determination of appropriate market comparables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. The long-term financial forecast represents the best estimate that we have at this time and we believe that its underlying assumptions are reasonable. However, actual performance in the near-term and longer-term could be materially different from these forecasts, which could impact future estimates of fair value of our reporting units and may result in a charge to earnings in future periods due to the potential for a write-down of goodwill in connection with such tests.
Accounting for income taxes
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. We apply a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if on the weight of available evidence; it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement.
Although we believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made.
As we account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, we recognize deferred tax assets or liabilities for the anticipated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the net deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, historical and future levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies are considered. In the event that it is determined that the deferred tax assets to be realized in the future would be in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be recorded. This adjustment would increase income in the period that such determination was made. Likewise, should it be determined that all or part of a recorded net deferred tax asset would not be realized in the future, an adjustment to increase the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be charged to income in the period that such determination would be made.
On a periodic basis, we evaluate the probability that our deferred tax assets will be recovered to assess its realizability. To the extent we believe it is more likely than not that some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, we will increase the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets. Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily upon future taxable income. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require possible material adjustments to these deferred tax assets, impacting net income or net loss in the period when such determinations are made.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AS COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
The following table presents our net revenues, by revenue source:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Domain Services |
|
$ |
15,403,010 |
|
$ |
14,202,023 |
|
Email Services |
|
638,188 |
|
1,121,935 |
|
||
Other Services |
|
1,093,711 |
|
1,094,460 |
|
||
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
17,134,909 |
|
16,418,418 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
YummyNames |
|
1,711,321 |
|
1,865,033 |
|
||
Hover |
|
1,129,497 |
|
1,300,584 |
|
||
Butterscotch |
|
469,426 |
|
507,389 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
20,445,153 |
|
$ |
20,091,424 |
|
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
353,729 |
|
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
The following table presents our revenues, by revenue source, as a percentage of total revenues:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
Domain Services |
|
76 |
% |
71 |
% |
Email Services |
|
3 |
% |
6 |
% |
Other Services |
|
5 |
% |
5 |
% |
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
84 |
% |
82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YummyNames |
|
8 |
% |
9 |
% |
Hover |
|
6 |
% |
6 |
% |
Butterscotch |
|
2 |
% |
3 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Deferred revenue from domain name registrations and other services at March 31, 2010 increased to $59.5 million from $56.7 million at March 31, 2009.
No customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and, at March 31, 2010, two customers accounted for 32% of accounts receivable. Significant management judgment is required at the time of recording of revenue to assess whether the collection of the resulting receivables is reasonably assured. On an ongoing basis we assess the ability of our customers to make required payments. Based on this assessment, we expect the carrying amount of our outstanding receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, to be fully collected.
OpenSRS
Net revenues from OpenSRS services for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009, increased by $0.7 million to $17.1 million.
This increase resulted from an increase in domain services of $1.2 million to $15.4 million, primarily the result of increased volumes of new clients and retention of existing customers. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the total new, renewed and transferred-in domain name registrations that we processed increased by 0.2 million to 2.0 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
While we anticipate that the number of new, renewed and transferred-in domain name registrations will continue to incrementally increase, the volatility in the market could affect the growth of domain names that we manage. As of March 31, 2010, the total domain names under our management increased by 0.4 million to 8.3 million, as compared to the total domain names under our management as of March 31, 2009. In addition, we provide provisioning services on a monthly
basis to accredited registrars who use our technical systems to process domain registrations with their own accreditation. As of March 31, 2010, we managed 1.7 million domain names on behalf of other accredited registrars, an increase of 0.2 million compared to the 1.5 million managed for accredited registrars as of March 31, 2009.
This increase from domain services was partially offset by $0.5 million to $0.6 million, primarily as a result of the loss of certain media portal email customers as was fully disclosed in prior filings. As our marketing efforts to date have not yet been successful in offsetting these customer losses, these customer losses have had a material adverse impact on our results of operations for email services for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
YummyNames
Net revenues from our YummyNames domain portfolio service for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased by $0.2 million, or 8%, to $1.7 million.
This decrease resulted from a reduction in our pay-per-click advertising or parked pages revenue by $0.2 million to $0.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily the result of the lower inventory of names available for parking purposes as we continue to sell non-strategic names. In addition, revenue from the sale of domain names decreased by $0.1 million to $1.2 million, primarily the result of the impact that our being able to sell the bulk of our backlog of non-strategic names during Fiscal 2009 has had on our regular bi-monthly sale of names.
These decreases were partially offset by the improved performance we are currently experiencing with our auction initiatives.
The market for monetization of domain names is rapidly evolving and there is no guarantee that we will be able to continue to acquire the same caliber of names for our portfolio from future expiring domains or that names we acquire in future will provide the same revenue impact as we have experienced from past acquisitions. In addition, the revenue we derive from domain portfolio services is driven by general macroeconomic factors that affect internet advertising. Our advertising expenditures are typically sensitive to economic conditions and tend to decline in recessionary periods and other periods of economic uncertainty.
Hover
Net revenues from Hover for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased by $0.2 million, or 13%, to $1.1 million.
Hover has been focusing on improving our retail platform to provide retail customers with a cleaner, simpler way to register and manage domain names and email addresses. During this initiative, we have been de-emphasizing new customer acquisitions while we concentrated on renewals. With the completion of our transitioning our retail customers from our Domain Direct, NetIdentity and IYD services to Hover, we have again begun to concentrate on launching programs to drive new customer acquisitions..
Butterscotch
Net revenues from Butterscotch for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 remained relatively flat at $0.5 million.
COST OF REVENUES
OpenSRS
· OpenSRS Domain Service
Cost of revenues for domain registrations represents the amortization of registry fees on a basis consistent with the recognition of revenues from our customers, namely ratably over the term of provision of the service. Registry fees, the primary component of cost of revenues, are paid in full when the domain is registered, and are initially recorded as prepaid domain registry fees. This accounting treatment reasonably approximates a recognition pattern that corresponds with the provision of the services during the period.
· OpenSRS Email Service
Cost of revenues for email services are payable to third-party providers for licensing and royalty costs related to the provision of certain components of our email services. Fees payable for these components are included in the cost of revenues in the month they are incurred.
· Other OpenSRS Services
Costs of revenues for other reseller services include fees paid to third-party service providers, primarily for SSL certificates and for printing services in connection with Platypus. Fees payable for SSL certificates are amortized on a basis consistent with the provision of service, generally one year, while monthly printing fees are included in cost of revenues in the month they are incurred.
YummyNames
Costs of revenues for our domain portfolio service represent the amortization of registry fees for domains added to our portfolio over the renewal period, which is generally one year, the value attributed under intangible assets to any domain name sold and any impairment charges that may arise from our assessment of our domain name intangible assets. As the total names in our portfolio continue to grow, this cost will become a more significant component of our cost of revenues. Payments for domain registrations are payable for the full term of service at the time of activation of service and are recorded as prepaid domain registry fees and are expensed ratably over the renewal term.
Hover
Costs of revenues for our provision and management of Internet services on a retail basis include the amortization of registry fees on a basis consistent with the recognition of revenues from our customers, namely ratably over the term of provision of the service and includes the amortization of registry fees payable to renew the domains in our surname portfolio. Registry fees, the primary component of cost of revenues, are paid in full when the domain is registered, and are recorded as prepaid domain registry fees.
Butterscotch
Costs of revenues for our ad-supported content sites include the fees paid to third-party service providers, primarily for digital certificates sold through our content sites and content license fees.
Network costs
Network costs include personnel and related expenses, depreciation and amortization, communication costs, equipment maintenance, stock-based compensation and employee and related costs directly associated with the management and maintenance of our network. Communication costs include bandwidth, co-location and provisioning costs we incur to support the supply of all our services.
The following table presents our cost of revenues, by revenue source, for the periods presented:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Domain Services |
|
$ |
12,616,231 |
|
$ |
11,354,762 |
|
Email Services |
|
107,138 |
|
179,918 |
|
||
Other Services |
|
387,123 |
|
388,852 |
|
||
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
13,110,492 |
|
11,923,532 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
YummyNames |
|
202,754 |
|
185,554 |
|
||
Hover |
|
399,445 |
|
513,210 |
|
||
Butterscotch |
|
18,859 |
|
6,740 |
|
||
Network, other costs |
|
1,193,324 |
|
1,156,362 |
|
||
Network, depreciation and amortization costs |
|
384,860 |
|
422,146 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
15,309,734 |
|
$ |
14,207,544 |
|
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
1,102,190 |
|
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
8 |
% |
|
|
The following table presents our cost of revenues, as a percentage of total cost of revenues for the periods presented:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OpenSRS : |
|
|
|
|
|
Domain Services |
|
81 |
% |
80 |
% |
Email Services |
|
1 |
% |
1 |
% |
Other Services |
|
3 |
% |
3 |
% |
Total OpenSRS Services |
|
85 |
% |
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YummyNames |
|
1 |
% |
1 |
% |
Hover |
|
3 |
% |
4 |
% |
Butterscotch |
|
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
Network, other costs |
|
8 |
% |
8 |
% |
Network, depreciation and amortization costs |
|
3 |
% |
3 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Prepaid domain registration and other Internet services fees as of March 31, 2010 increased by $3.1 million, or 7%, to $46.3 million from $43.2 million at March 31, 2009.
OpenSRS
Costs for OpenSRS for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased by $1.1 million, or 8%, when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase was primarily as a result of higher domain registration volumes experienced during the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
This increase was partially offset by decreased email services costs as certain costs incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2009 were one-time costs.
YummyNames
Costs for YummyNames for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 remained relatively flat at $0.2 million.
Hover
Costs for Hover for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased by $0.1 million, to $0.4 million. This decrease is a result of the decrease in revenue as described above.
Network costs
Network costs before depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2010 remained relatively flat at $1.2 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009, despite the significant strengthening on average of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar by approximately 15% from the prior fiscal first quarter, and reflects the improved efficiency of operating and managing our co-location facilities.
A significant portion of our operating and network expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars, as a result the strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar has negatively impacted all of our operating costs, during the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Exchange rates are, however, subject to significant and rapid fluctuations, and we therefore cannot predict the prospective impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Network depreciation and amortization costs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 remained relatively flat at $0.4 million, primarily as a result of certain of our older computer hardware now being fully depreciated and not requiring replacement.
Excluding movements in exchange rates, we expect network costs to decrease slightly for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
SALES AND MARKETING
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs. These costs include commissions and related expenses of our sales, product management, public relations, call center, support and marketing personnel. Other sales and marketing expenses include customer acquisition costs, advertising and other promotional costs.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
1,862,336 |
|
$ |
1,353,176 |
|
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
509,160 |
|
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
38 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
9 |
% |
7 |
% |
||
Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased by $0.5 million, or 38%, to $1.9 million when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to higher workforce costs that resulted from additional people employed in both our marketing and customer service areas and the negative impact the significant strengthening on average of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar by approximately 15% from the prior fiscal first quarter has had on sales and marketing expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Included in sales and marketing expenses is a non-recurring cost of approximately $0.1 million related to severance costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Excluding movements in exchange rates, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase slightly during Fiscal 2010, in absolute dollars, as we adjust our marketing programs and sales and customer support strategies to meet future opportunities in the marketplace.
TECHNICAL OPERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
Technical operations and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related expenses required to support the development of new or enhanced service offerings and the maintenance and upgrading of existing infrastructure. This includes expenses incurred in the research, design and development of technology that we use to register domain names, email, retail, domain portfolio and other Internet services, as well as to distribute our digital content services. Editorial costs relating to the rating and review of the software content libraries are included in the costs of product development. Costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and primarily include personnel costs for employees directly related to the development project. As no material expenditures for qualified application development stage initiatives were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009, no amounts have been capitalized. All other costs are expensed as incurred.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Technical operations and development |
|
$ |
1,243,013 |
|
$ |
1,104,139 |
|
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
138,874 |
|
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
13 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
6 |
% |
5 |
% |
||
Technical operations and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased by $0.1 million, or 13%, to $1.2 million when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
This increase for the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulted primarily from an increase in workforce-related costs, including contract and outside service costs, primarily the result of the significant strengthening on average of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar by approximately 15% from the prior fiscal first quarter.
Excluding movements in exchange rates, we expect technical operations and development expenses, in absolute dollars, for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 to remain relatively flat when compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related costs for managerial and administrative personnel, fees for professional services, public listing expenses, rent and other general corporate expenses.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
$ |
815,580 |
|
$ |
1,869,896 |
|
Decrease over comparative period |
|
$ |
(1,054,316 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease - percentage |
|
(56 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
4 |
% |
9 |
% |
||
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased by $1.1 million, or 56%, to $0.8 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This was primarily as a result of our recording a foreign exchange gain of $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. This gain in foreign exchange was primarily the result of the strengthening on average of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar by approximately 15% from the three months ended March 31, 2009. This decrease was offset mainly by an increase in workforce related costs, facility costs and professional fees of $0.3million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
|
$ |
43,889 |
|
$ |
82,453 |
|
Decrease over comparative period |
|
$ |
(38,564 |
) |
|
|
|
Decrease - percentage |
|
(47 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
% |
|
% |
||
Depreciation costs for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased by $39,000, or 47%, to $44,000, primarily the result of certain of our older assets being fully depreciated.
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
$ |
360,540 |
|
$ |
360,540 |
|
Decrease over comparative period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease - percentage |
|
|
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
2 |
% |
2 |
% |
||
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amounts arising in connection with the acquisition of Boardtown in April 2004, the acquisition of the hosted messaging assets of Critical Path Inc. in January 2006, the acquisition of Mailbank.com Inc. in June 2006 and the acquisition of IYD in July 2007.
In connection with the acquisition of Boardtown Corporation, the brand and customer relationships purchased are amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years, while the non-competition agreements entered into with the former owners of Boardtown Corporation are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
Customer relationships acquired in connection with the acquisition of the hosted messaging assets of Critical Path Inc. are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years.
Customer relationships acquired in connection with the acquisition of Mailbank.com Inc. are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years.
The brand and customer relationships acquired in connection with the acquisition of Mailbank.com Inc. are amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years.
GAIN ON CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
Although our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, a major portion of our fixed expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. Our goal with regard to foreign currency exposure is, to the extent possible; to achieve operational cost certainty, manage financial exposure to certain foreign exchange fluctuations and to neutralize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange movements. Accordingly, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate the exchange rate risk on portions of our Canadian dollar exposure.
As we are not required to comply with the documentation requirements for hedge accounting, we account for the fair value of the derivative instruments within the consolidated balance sheet as a derivative financial asset or liability and the corresponding change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Gain on change in fair value of forward contracts |
|
$ |
(113,973 |
) |
$ |
(85,343 |
) |
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
(28,630 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
34 |
% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
(1 |
)% |
|
% |
||
We have entered into forward exchange contracts to meet a portion of our future Canadian dollar requirements through September 2011. The impact of the fair value adjustment on unrealized foreign exchange on these contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was a net gain of $0.1 million, as compared to a net gain of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This net gain in fair value of forward contracts results from a combination of the impact from the change in foreign exchange rates over time, as well as from the impact of the settlement of forward exchange contracts as they mature.
At March 31, 2010, we reflect a derivative instrument asset of $2.3 million on our balance sheet as a result of our foreign exchange contracts. Until their respective maturity dates, these contracts will fluctuate in value in line with movements in the Canadian vs. U.S. dollar pair. As all of the remaining contracts pertaining to the 2010 fiscal year will have matured during the course of the 2010 fiscal year, a derivative instrument asset pertaining to 2010 fiscal year contracts of $2.0 million will reverse during the 2010 fiscal year and will result in our recognizing an additional non-cash loss of this amount by December 31, 2010. This loss may, however, be impacted by any additional contracts, with maturity dates after
March 31, 2010, that we may enter into and fluctuations in the value of our existing contracts that mature during the 2010 and 2011 fiscal years.
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Other income (expenses), net |
|
$ |
(39,168 |
) |
$ |
(63,462 |
) |
Increase over comparative period |
|
$ |
24,294 |
|
|
|
|
Increase - percentage |
|
(38 |
)% |
|
|
||
Percentage of net revenues |
|
(0 |
)% |
|
% |
||
Other income, net, primarily relates to interest payable pursuant to the terms of our Bank of Montreal credit facility, and decreased when compared to the prior fiscal first quarter as a result of the principal repayments we have made since March 2009.
INCOME TAXES
The following table presents our provision for income taxes for the periods presented:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
316,000 |
|
$ |
107,425 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $316,000 on income before taxes of $885,000 using an estimated effective tax rate for its 2010 fiscal year. Comparatively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a current tax expense of $107,000 on income before income taxes of $1.1 million using an estimated effective tax rate for its 2009 fiscal year that accounts for the utilization of remaining net operating loss carry forwards and alternative minimum tax credits available to us.
As of December 31, 2009, we recorded a valuation allowance of $4.3 million and a net deferred tax asset of $3.0 million. As of March 31, 2010 we have recorded a deferred tax asset of $4.1 million which has been allocated to non-current deferred tax assets and $1.1 million which has been allocated to current deferred tax liabilities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had also recorded a non current deferred tax liability related to the temporary difference arising on indefinite life intangibles of $4.8 million.
We analyze the carrying value of our deferred tax asset on a regular basis. In determining future taxable income, assumptions are made to forecast federal, state and international operating income, the reversal of temporary timing differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. The assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of future taxable income, and are consistent with other forecasts used to manage the business. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, there was no reversal of the valuation allowance. The valuation allowance will be maintained until sufficient evidence exists to support a reversal of, or decrease in, the valuation allowance.
We follow the provisions of FASB ASC: Topic 740, Income Taxes to account for income tax exposures. The application of this interpretation requires a two-step process that separates recognition of uncertain tax benefits from measurement thereof.
We have approximately $107,000 of total gross unrecognized tax benefit as of March 31, 2010 and $124,000 of total gross unrecognized tax benefit as of December 31, 2009, which if recognized would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. The unrecognized tax benefit relates to prior year Pennsylvania state franchise taxes and other US state taxes. The unrecognized tax benefit has decreased by $17,000 when compared to the gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 as Pennsylvania have now settled their claim for the years December 31, 1996 to December 31, 2000. We do not expect the unrecognized tax benefit for the 2009 and 2010 research and development claim to be significant. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to taxes in tax expense. We did not have significant interest and penalties accrued as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 respectively. We believe it is reasonably possible that $107,000 of the unrecognized tax benefit will decrease in the next twelve months as it is anticipated that the U.S. tax authorities will finalize their review of prior taxes owing in Pennsylvania within the period and certain other prior year state tax returns will be filed.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of March 31, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows generated from operations and cash and cash equivalents of $5.2 million, as compared to $9.6 million at December 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $1.4 million, as compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This increase of $0.5 million was primarily the result of improved management in working capital.
Net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 totaled $5.7 million. We used $4.5 million to repurchase 6.4 million shares pursuant to the terms of a Dutch auction tender offer completed during January 2010 and $0.7 million to repurchase 956,000 of our shares under the terms of our stock repurchase program announced in February 2010.
Pursuant to the terms of our non-revolving, reducing credit facility, we also made equal monthly principal repayments totalling $0.5 million. We currently estimate that the cash sweep payment, which will be based on our audited 2009 results and will be payable during the three months ending June 30, 2010, will be sufficient to pay off in full the outstanding balance of our non-revolving, reducing credit facility during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Investing activities used net cash of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $48,000 in net cash used in the same period in Fiscal year 2009, primarily a result of the acquisition of additional property and equipment.
Based on our operations, we believe that our cash flow from operations will be adequate to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and our loan repayments for at least the next 12 months.
We may choose to raise additional funds or seek other financing arrangements to facilitate more rapid expansion, develop new or enhance existing products or services, respond to competitive pressures or acquire or invest in complementary businesses, technologies, services or products.
If additional financing is required, we may not be able to raise it on acceptable terms, or at all, and additional financing may be dilutive to existing investors. We may also evaluate potential acquisitions of other businesses, products and technologies. To complete potential acquisitions, we may issue additional securities or need additional equity or debt financing and any additional financing may be dilutive to existing investors. There are currently no material understandings, commitments or agreements regarding the acquisition of other businesses.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We develop products in Canada and sell these services in North America and Europe. Our sales are primarily made in U.S. dollars, while a major portion of expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. Our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of Canadian and U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in short-term instruments. Based on the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that there is no material interest rate risk exposure as of March 31, 2010. We are also subject to market risk exposure related to changes in interest rates on our non-revolving, reducing credit facility with The Bank of Montreal. Any changes in interest rates are not expected to be material. Fluctuations in interest rates are beyond our control. We will continue to monitor and assess the risks associated with interest expense exposure and may take additional actions in the future to mitigate these risks.
Although our functional currency is the U.S. dollar, a substantial portion of our fixed expenses are incurred in Canadian dollars. Our policy with respect to foreign currency exposure is to manage financial exposure to certain foreign exchange fluctuations with the objective of neutralizing some of the impact of foreign currency exchange movements. Exchange rates are, however, subject to significant and rapid fluctuations, and therefore we cannot predict the prospective impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Accordingly, we have entered into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate the exchange rate risk on portions of our Canadian dollar exposure.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had forward exchange contracts to trade U.S. dollars in exchange for Canadian dollars as follows:
|
|
Notional |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
||
|
|
amount of |
|
exchange rate of |
|
|
|
||
Maturity date |
|
U.S. dollars |
|
U.S. dollars |
|
Fair value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
April - June 2010 |
|
$ |
4,939,000 |
|
0.8427 |
|
$ |
834,551 |
|
July - September 2010 |
|
5,400,000 |
|
0.8596 |
|
785,784 |
|
||
October - December 2010 |
|
5,400,000 |
|
0.9236 |
|
350,015 |
|
||
Total 2010 |
|
15,739,000 |
|
0.8749 |
|
1,970,350 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
January March, 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9302 |
|
215,338 |
|
||
April - June 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9635 |
|
64,335 |
|
||
July - September 2011 |
|
3,900,000 |
|
0.9604 |
|
68,620 |
|
||
Total 2011 |
|
11,700,000 |
|
0.9511 |
|
348,293 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
27,439,000 |
|
0.9058 |
|
$ |
2,318,643 |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a series of foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge a portion of its 2011 fiscal year expected Canadian dollar requirements. These contracts, collectively, have a notional value of US$6.5 million, whereby US$650,000 is converted into Canadian dollars on a semi-monthly basis from May 2011 to September 2011 at an average foreign exchange rate of US$1.00: Cdn$1.0390.
As the Company does not comply with the documentation requirements for hedge accounting, we account for the fair value of the derivative instruments within the consolidated balance sheet as a derivative financial asset or liability and the corresponding change in fair value is recorded in our consolidated statement of operations. We have no other freestanding or embedded derivative instruments.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $114,000 in the fair value of forward contracts in its consolidated statements of operations and a net derivative asset of $2.3 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a gain on forward contracts of $85,000 in the fair value of forward contracts in its consolidated statements of operations and a derivative liability of $1.9 million.
We have performed a sensitivity analysis model for foreign exchange exposure over the three months ended March 31, 2010. The analysis used a modeling technique that compares the U.S. dollar equivalent of all expenses incurred in Canadian dollars, at the actual exchange rate, to a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in the foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar, with all other variables held constant. Foreign currency exchange rates used were based on the market rates in effect during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The sensitivity analysis indicated that a hypothetical
10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates would result in a decrease in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of approximately $0.5 million. There can be no assurances that the above projected exchange rate decrease will materialize. Fluctuations of exchange rates are beyond our control. We will continue to monitor and assess the risk associated with these exposures and may take additional actions in the future to hedge or mitigate these risks.
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, marketable securities, foreign exchange contracts and accounts receivable. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are in high-quality securities placed with major banks and financial institutions whom we have evaluated as highly creditworthy and commercial paper. With respect to accounts receivable, we perform ongoing evaluations of our customers, generally granting uncollateralized credit terms to our customers, and maintaining an allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience and our expectation of future losses.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We are involved in various investigations, claims and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of our business, none of which, in our opinion, will harm our business. We cannot assure that we will prevail in any litigation. Regardless of the outcome, any litigation may require us to incur significant litigation expense and may result in significant diversion of our attention.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should also carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, all of which could materially affect our business, financial condition or operating results and should be considered before making an investment decision regarding our securities. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In the three months ended March 31, 2010 we used $5,212,272 to repurchase 7,297,470 shares of the Companys common stock pursuant to a Dutch auction tender offer and a normal course issuer bid. All shares repurchased were cancelled. The following table shows the monthly activity related to our stock repurchases for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Period |
|
Total number of |
|
Average price paid per |
|
Total number of shares |
|
Maximum number of shares |
|
|
March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 |
|
954,400 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
954,400 |
|
13,128,507 |
|
February 1, through February 28, 2010 |
|
1,600 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
1,600 |
|
14,082,907 |
|
January 1, through January 31, 2010 |
|
6,341,470 |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
6,341,470 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
7,297,470 |
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
7,297,470 |
|
|
|
(1) On January 13, 2010, the Company announced that it successfully concluded a modified Dutch auction tender offer that was previously announced on December 14, 2009. Under the terms of the offer, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 6,341,470 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $0.70 per share, for a total of $4,439,029, excluding transaction costs of $51,957. Due to over-subscription, the final proration factor for shares tendered at or below $0.70 per share was approximately 99.9%. For this purpose, shares tendered at $0.70 per share included shares tendered by those persons who indicated, in their letter of transmittal, that they were willing to accept the price determined in the offer. All shares purchased in the tender offer received the same price.
(2) On February 16, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase of up to $10 million of its common stock at its discretion under the terms of a normal course issuer bid. Based on the market share price of $0.71 at close of business on March 31, 2010, the Company is eligible to repurchase up to 14,084,507 shares of common stock, on the NYSE Amex, under the terms of this normal course issuer bid.
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Tucows current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on November 29, 2007) |
3.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with Tucows annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2007) |
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification * |
31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification * |
32.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officers Section 1350 Certification |
32.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officers Section 1350 Certification |
* Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 14, 2010 |
|
TUCOWS INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Elliot Noss |
|
|
|
Elliot Noss |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael Cooperman |
|
|
|
Michael Cooperman Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Tucows current report on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC on November 29, 2007) |
3.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Tucows Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with Tucows annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2007) |
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification * |
31.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officers Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification * |
32.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officers Section 1350 Certification |
32.2 |
|
Chief Financial Officers Section 1350 Certification |
* Filed herewith.
Furnished herewith.