UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended April 29, 2012
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-2402
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
41-0319970 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
|
|
| |
1 Hormel Place |
|
|
|
Austin, Minnesota |
|
|
55912-3680 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(507) 437-5611
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X YES NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). X YES NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer X |
|
Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes X No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at June 3, 2012 |
Common Stock |
|
$.0293 par value 263,357,840 |
Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
$.01 par value -0- |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(In Thousands of Dollars)
|
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
524,779 |
|
$ |
463,130 |
|
Short-term marketable securities |
|
76,811 |
|
76,077 |
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
439,348 |
|
461,110 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
912,672 |
|
885,823 |
| ||
Income taxes receivable |
|
16,649 |
|
24,423 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
69,485 |
|
69,203 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
|
11,986 |
|
10,048 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
8,345 |
|
8,417 |
| ||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
2,060,075 |
|
1,998,231 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
67,033 |
|
59,814 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
GOODWILL |
|
630,875 |
|
630,884 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OTHER INTANGIBLES |
|
127,593 |
|
132,046 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
PENSION ASSETS |
|
79,896 |
|
80,208 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INVESTMENTS IN AND RECEIVABLES FROM AFFILIATES |
|
301,685 |
|
295,698 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OTHER ASSETS |
|
138,977 |
|
140,420 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land |
|
56,245 |
|
56,273 |
| ||
Buildings |
|
757,331 |
|
749,143 |
| ||
Equipment |
|
1,405,774 |
|
1,393,128 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
73,315 |
|
50,286 |
| ||
|
|
2,292,665 |
|
2,248,830 |
| ||
Less allowance for depreciation
|
|
(1,384,136) |
|
(1,341,740) |
| ||
|
|
908,529 |
|
907,090 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
4,314,663 |
|
$ |
4,244,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(In Thousands of Dollars)
|
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
318,432 |
|
$ |
390,171 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
53,729 |
|
40,539 |
| ||
Accrued workers compensation |
|
33,281 |
|
32,218 |
| ||
Accrued marketing expenses |
|
86,327 |
|
77,363 |
| ||
Employee related expenses |
|
161,272 |
|
195,258 |
| ||
Taxes payable |
|
6,776 |
|
8,137 |
| ||
Interest and dividends payable |
|
40,151 |
|
34,500 |
| ||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
699,968 |
|
778,186 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS |
|
476,173 |
|
473,688 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LONG-TERM DEBT less current maturities |
|
250,000 |
|
250,000 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
82,699 |
|
82,701 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, par value $.01 a share-- |
|
|
|
|
| ||
authorized 160,000,000 shares; issued none |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, non-voting, par value $.01 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
a share authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued none |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, par value $.0293 a share-- |
|
|
|
|
| ||
authorized 800,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
| ||
issued 263,239,531 shares April 29, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
issued 263,963,251 shares October 30, 2011 |
|
7,713 |
|
7,734 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(187,529) |
|
(175,483) |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
2,980,353 |
|
2,824,331 |
| ||
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
2,800,537 |
|
2,656,582 |
| ||
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
|
5,286 |
|
3,234 |
| ||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
2,805,823 |
|
2,659,816 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
|
$ |
4,314,663 |
|
$ |
4,244,391 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,012,859 |
|
$ |
1,959,041 |
|
$ |
4,052,298 |
|
$ |
3,880,599 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
1,677,252 |
|
1,632,814 |
|
3,379,282 |
|
3,180,367 |
| ||||
GROSS PROFIT |
|
335,607 |
|
326,227 |
|
673,016 |
|
700,232 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
148,684 |
|
160,136 |
|
301,161 |
|
305,297 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
7,816 |
|
6,672 |
|
18,817 |
|
13,577 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
194,739 |
|
172,763 |
|
390,672 |
|
408,512 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income and expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest and investment income |
|
2,338 |
|
1,972 |
|
3,928 |
|
2,413 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
(3,283) |
|
(7,187) |
|
(6,497) |
|
(13,766) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
193,794 |
|
167,548 |
|
388,103 |
|
397,159 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
64,859 |
|
56,846 |
|
129,835 |
|
136,422 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET EARNINGS |
|
128,935 |
|
110,702 |
|
258,268 |
|
260,737 |
| ||||
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
1,048 |
|
1,123 |
|
1,986 |
|
2,332 |
| ||||
NET EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION |
|
$ |
127,887 |
|
$ |
109,579 |
|
$ |
256,282 |
|
$ |
258,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC |
|
263,610 |
|
267,207 |
|
263,778 |
|
266,868 |
| ||||
DILUTED |
|
269,061 |
|
272,847 |
|
269,334 |
|
272,293 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE: |
|
$ |
0.1500 |
|
$ |
0.1275 |
|
$ |
0.3000 |
|
$ |
0.2550 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS INVESTMENT
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Hormel Foods Corporation Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Non- controlling Interest |
|
Total Shareholders Investment |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Balance at October 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,793 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,568,774 |
|
$ |
(175,910 |
) |
$ 5,982 |
|
$ |
2,406,639 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474,195 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
479,196 |
| ||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
843 |
|
251 |
|
1,094 |
| ||||||
Deferred hedging, net of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,476 |
) |
|
|
(3,476 |
) | ||||||
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,252 |
|
479,874 |
| ||||||
Purchases of common stock |
|
|
|
(152,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,930 |
) | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
17,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,229 |
| ||||||
Exercise of stock options/nonvested shares |
|
102 |
|
(163 |
) |
53,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,039 |
| ||||||
Shares retired |
|
(161 |
) |
153,093 |
|
(70,329 |
) |
(82,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
(8,000 |
) | ||||||
Declared cash dividends $.51 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(136,035 |
) | ||||||
Balance at October 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,734 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,824,331 |
|
$ |
(175,483 |
) |
$ 3,234 |
|
$ |
2,659,816 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,282 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
258,268 |
| ||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
66 |
|
1,124 |
| ||||||
Deferred hedging, net of reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,673 |
) |
|
|
(16,673 |
) | ||||||
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
246,288 |
| ||||||
Purchases of common stock |
|
|
|
(42,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,088 |
) | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
11,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,129 |
| ||||||
Exercise of stock options/nonvested shares |
|
22 |
|
(211 |
) |
9,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,515 |
| ||||||
Shares retired |
|
(43 |
) |
42,299 |
|
(20,833 |
) |
(21,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
| ||||||
Declared cash dividends $.30 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(78,837 |
) | ||||||
Balance at April 29, 2012 |
|
$ |
7,713 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,980,353 |
|
$ |
(187,529 |
) |
$ 5,286 |
|
$ |
2,805,823 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
|
May 1, 2011 |
| |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
258,268 |
|
$ |
260,737 |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
|
|
55,254 |
|
57,362 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4,453 |
|
4,919 |
| ||
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of dividends |
|
|
(7,657) |
|
(9,546) |
| ||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(793) |
|
(3,187) |
| ||
Gain on property/equipment sales and plant facilities |
|
|
(279) |
|
(53) |
| ||
Non-cash investment activities |
|
|
(2,309) |
|
(478) |
| ||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
11,129 |
|
12,242 |
| ||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(4,634) |
|
(10,255) |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
21,762 |
|
25,147 |
| ||
Increase in inventories |
|
|
(26,849) |
|
(16,617) |
| ||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(14,782) |
|
45,924 |
| ||
Increase in pension and post-retirement benefits |
|
|
8,569 |
|
12,579 |
| ||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(89,101) |
|
(102,855) |
| ||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
213,031 |
|
275,919 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (purchase) sale of trading securities |
|
|
- |
|
5,000 |
| ||
Acquisitions of businesses/intangibles |
|
|
(168) |
|
(7,207) |
| ||
Purchases of property/equipment |
|
|
(58,217) |
|
(35,892) |
| ||
Proceeds from sales of property/equipment |
|
|
1,803 |
|
2,171 |
| ||
Decrease in investments, equity in affiliates, and other assets |
|
|
4,746 |
|
3,465 |
| ||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(51,836) |
|
(32,463) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net |
|
|
- |
|
247,657 |
| ||
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(73,186) |
|
(61,925) |
| ||
Share repurchase |
|
|
(42,088) |
|
(34,718) |
| ||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
10,028 |
|
43,764 |
| ||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,634 |
|
10,255 |
| ||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
- |
|
(3,000) |
| ||
Other |
|
|
- |
|
(1,148) |
| ||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(100,612) |
|
200,885 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
1,066 |
|
1,518 |
| ||
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
61,649 |
|
445,859 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
463,130 |
|
467,845 |
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF QUARTER |
|
$ |
524,779 |
|
$ |
913,704 |
| |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE A GENERAL
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Hormel Foods Corporation (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information, and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. The balance sheet at October 30, 2011, has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011.
Certain reclassifications of previously reported amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on net earnings as previously reported.
Investments
The Company maintains a rabbi trust to fund certain supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans, which is included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The securities held by the trust are classified as trading securities. Therefore, unrealized gains and losses associated with these investments are included in the Companys earnings. Gains related to securities held by the trust were $1.4 million and $2.7 million for the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to gains of $1.4 million and $1.8 million for the second quarter and six months ended May 1, 2011. The Company has transitioned the majority of this portfolio to more fixed return investments to reduce the exposure to volatility in equity markets.
The Company also holds securities as part of an investment portfolio, which are classified as short-term marketable securities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. These investments are also trading securities. Therefore, unrealized gains and losses are included in the Companys earnings. The Company recorded a gain of $0.4 million and $0.7 million related to these investments during the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to a gain of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the second quarter and six months ended May 1, 2011.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Non-cash investment activities presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows generally consist of unrealized gains or losses on the Companys rabbi trust and other investments, amortization of affordable housing investments, and amortization of bond financing costs. The noted investments are included in other assets or short-term marketable securities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Changes in the value of these investments are included in the Companys net earnings and are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as either interest and investment income or interest expense, as appropriate.
Guarantees
The Company enters into various agreements guaranteeing specified obligations of affiliated parties. The Companys guarantees either terminate in one year or remain in place until such time as the Company revokes the agreement. The Company currently provides a renewable standby letter of credit for $4.8 million to guarantee obligations that may arise under worker compensation claims of an affiliated party. This potential obligation is not reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) updated the guidance within Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 220, Comprehensive Income. The update eliminates the option for companies to report other comprehensive income and its related components in the Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity. Instead, companies have the option to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous Statement of Comprehensive Income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance is to be applied retrospectively, and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the new provisions of this accounting standard at the beginning of fiscal year 2013, and adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, as it relates to presentation only.
In May 2011, the FASB updated the guidance within ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The update amends and clarifies current fair value measurement guidance, and requires additional disclosures. The most significant disclosure requirement relates to quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption is not permitted. Accordingly, the Company adopted the new provisions of this accounting standard in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, and adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE B STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company issues stock options and nonvested shares as part of its stock incentive plans for employees and non-employee directors. The Companys policy is to grant options with the exercise price equal to the market price of the common stock on the date of grant. Options typically vest over periods ranging from six months to four years and expire ten years after the grant date. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense ratably over the shorter of the requisite service period or vesting period. The fair value of stock-based compensation granted to retirement-eligible individuals is expensed at the time of grant.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company made a one-time grant of 100 stock options (pre-2011 split) to each active, full-time employee of the Company on January 8, 2007. This grant was to vest upon the earlier of five years or attainment of a closing stock price of $50.00 per share (pre-2011 split) for five consecutive trading days, and had an expiration of ten years after the grant date. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the options vested after the stock attained the required closing price per share for five consecutive trading days.
A reconciliation of the number of options outstanding and exercisable (in thousands) as of April 29, 2012, and changes during the six months then ended, is as follows:
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
Outstanding at October 30, 2011 |
|
19,932 |
|
$ 17.89 |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
2,642 |
|
29.42 |
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
1,071 |
|
14.93 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
28 |
|
20.72 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 29, 2012 |
|
21,475 |
|
$ 19.45 |
|
5.8 years |
|
$ 206,631 |
Exercisable at April 29, 2012 |
|
14,991 |
|
$ 17.26 |
|
4.6 years |
|
$ 176,233 |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted and the total intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands) during the second quarter and first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
|
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | ||||
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
5.37 |
|
$ |
5.67 |
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
$ |
5.54 |
Intrinsic value of exercised options |
|
$ |
9,492 |
|
$ |
20,648 |
|
$ |
15,321 |
|
$ |
39,187 |
The fair value of each option award is calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | ||||
|
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
Risk-Free Interest Rate |
|
1.6% |
|
3.2% |
|
1.8% |
|
3.0% |
Dividend Yield |
|
2.1% |
|
2.0% |
|
2.0% |
|
2.0% |
Stock Price Volatility |
|
21.0% |
|
21.0% |
|
21.0% |
|
21.0% |
Expected Option Life |
|
8 years |
|
8 years |
|
8 years |
|
8 years |
As part of the annual valuation process, the Company reassesses the appropriateness of the inputs used in the valuation models. The Company establishes the risk-free interest rate using stripped U.S. Treasury yields as of the grant date where the remaining term is approximately the expected life of the option. The dividend yield is set based on the dividend rate approved by the Companys Board of Directors and the stock price on the grant date. The expected volatility assumption is set based primarily on historical volatility. As a reasonableness test, implied volatility from exchange traded options is also examined to validate the volatility range obtained from the historical analysis. The expected option life assumption is set based on an analysis of past exercise behavior by option holders. In performing the valuations for option grants, the Company has not stratified option holders as exercise behavior has historically been consistent across all employee and non-employee director groups.
The Companys nonvested shares granted on or before September 26, 2010, vest after five years or upon retirement. Nonvested shares granted after September 26, 2010, vest after one year. A reconciliation of the nonvested shares (in thousands) as of April 29, 2012, and changes during the six months then ended, is as follows:
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- | |
Nonvested at October 30, 2011 |
|
215 |
|
$ |
19.94 |
Granted |
|
45 |
|
|
28.97 |
Vested |
|
110 |
|
|
21.13 |
Forfeited |
|
7 |
|
|
28.27 |
Nonvested at April 29, 2012 |
|
143 |
|
$ |
21.48 |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested shares granted, the total fair value (in thousands) of nonvested shares granted, and the fair value (in thousands) of shares that have vested during the first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
|
Six Months Ended | ||||
|
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | ||
Weighted-average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
28.97 |
|
$ |
24.84 |
Fair value of nonvested shares granted |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
$ |
1,118 |
Fair value of shares vested |
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
$ |
335 |
Stock-based compensation expense, along with the related income tax benefit, for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011 is presented in the table below.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | |||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |
Stock-based compensation expense recognized |
|
$ 4,889 |
|
$ 4,002 |
|
$ |
11,129 |
|
$ 12,242 |
Income tax benefit recognized |
|
(1,854) |
|
(1,520) |
|
|
(4,220) |
|
(4,650) |
After-tax stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ 3,035 |
|
$ 2,482 |
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
$ 7,592 |
At April 29, 2012, there was $16.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense from stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. This compensation is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.0 years. During the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, cash received from stock option exercises was $6.1 million and $10.0 million, respectively, compared to $19.8 million and $43.8 million for the second quarter and six months ended May 1, 2011. The total tax benefit to be realized for tax deductions from these option exercises for the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, was $3.6 million and $5.8 million, respectively, compared to $7.9 million and $14.9 million in the comparable periods in fiscal 2011.
Shares issued for option exercises and nonvested shares may be either authorized but unissued shares, or shares of treasury stock acquired in the open market or otherwise.
NOTE C GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended April 29, 2012, is presented in the table below. There were no changes in the carrying amount during the second quarter of fiscal 2012.
(in thousands) |
|
Grocery |
|
Refrigerated |
|
JOTS |
|
Specialty |
|
All Other |
|
Total |
| ||||||
Balance as of |
|
$ |
123,316 |
|
$ |
96,652 |
|
$ |
203,214 |
|
$ |
207,028 |
|
$ |
674 |
|
$ |
630,884 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
-- |
|
(9) |
|
-- |
|
-- |
|
-- |
|
(9) |
| ||||||
Balance as of |
|
$ |
123,316 |
|
$ |
96,643 |
|
$ |
203,214 |
|
$ |
207,028 |
|
$ |
674 |
|
$ |
630,875 |
|
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for definite-lived intangible assets are presented in the table below.
|
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
October 30, 2011 | ||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Gross Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross Carrying |
|
Accumulated | ||||
Customer lists/relationships |
|
$ |
22,148 |
|
$ |
(13,505) |
|
$ |
22,378 |
|
$ |
(12,556) |
Proprietary software & technology |
|
22,000 |
|
(16,071) |
|
22,000 |
|
(14,822) | ||||
Formulas & recipes |
|
17,854 |
|
(10,616) |
|
18,354 |
|
(10,047) | ||||
Distribution network |
|
4,120 |
|
(3,577) |
|
4,120 |
|
(3,371) | ||||
Other intangibles |
|
9,260 |
|
(6,085) |
|
14,030 |
|
(10,105) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
75,382 |
|
$ |
(49,854) |
|
$ |
80,882 |
|
$ |
(50,901) |
Amortization expense was $2.1 million and $4.5 million for the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, respectively, compared to $2.4 million and $4.9 million for the second quarter and six months ended May 1, 2011.
Estimated annual amortization expense (in thousands) for the five fiscal years after October 30, 2011, is as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
Estimated |
2012 |
|
$ 8,906 |
2013 |
|
7,699 |
2014 |
|
6,303 |
2015 |
|
3,192 |
2016 |
|
1,023 |
The carrying amounts for indefinite-lived intangible assets are presented in the table below.
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
October 30, 2011 |
| ||
Brands/tradenames/trademarks |
|
$ |
94,081 |
|
$ |
94,081 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
7,984 |
|
7,984 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
102,065 |
|
$ |
102,065 |
|
NOTE D INVESTMENTS IN AND RECEIVABLES FROM AFFILIATES
The Company accounts for its majority-owned operations under the consolidation method. Investments in which the Company owns a minority interest, and for which there are no other indicators of control, are accounted for under the equity or cost method. These investments, along with any related receivables from affiliates, are included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as investments in and receivables from affiliates.
Investments in and receivables from affiliates consists of the following:
(in thousands) |
|
Segment |
|
% |
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, |
MegaMex Foods, LLC |
|
Grocery Products |
|
50% |
|
$ 212,991 |
|
$ 205,523 |
Purefoods-Hormel Company |
|
All Other |
|
40% |
|
66,441 |
|
65,140 |
San Miguel Purefoods (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. |
|
All Other |
|
49% |
|
13,989 |
|
17,442 |
Other |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
8,264 |
|
7,593 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ 301,685 |
|
$ 295,698 |
Equity in earnings of affiliates consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | |||||
(in thousands) |
|
Segment |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |
MegaMex Foods, LLC |
|
Grocery Products |
|
$ 7,501 |
|
$ 6,762 |
|
$ 16,125 |
|
$ |
11,688 |
Purefoods-Hormel Company |
|
All Other |
|
982 |
|
779 |
|
4,469 |
|
2,804 | |
San Miguel Purefoods (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. |
|
All Other |
|
(901) |
|
(800) |
|
(2,368) |
|
(1,011) | |
Other |
|
Various |
|
234 |
|
(69) |
|
591 |
|
96 | |
Total |
|
|
|
$ 7,816 |
|
$ 6,672 |
|
$ 18,817 |
|
$ |
13,577 |
MegaMex Foods, LLC
On October 26, 2009, the Company completed the formation of MegaMex Foods, LLC (MegaMex), a 50/50 joint venture formed by the Company and Herdez Del Fuerte, S.A. de C.V. to market Mexican foods in the United States. On October 6, 2010, MegaMex acquired 100 percent of the stock of Don Miguel Foods Corp. (Don Miguel). Don Miguel is a leading provider of branded frozen and fresh authentic Mexican appetizers, snacks, and hand-held items. On August 22, 2011, MegaMex acquired 100 percent of Fresherized Foods, which produces Wholly Guacamole®, Wholly Salsa® and Wholly Queso® products.
The Company recognized a basis difference of $21.3 million associated with the formation of MegaMex, which is being amortized through equity in earnings of affiliates.
NOTE E EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA
The following table sets forth the denominator for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | ||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
263,610 |
|
267,207 |
|
263,778 |
|
266,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares |
|
5,451 |
|
5,640 |
|
5,556 |
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
269,061 |
|
272,847 |
|
269,334 |
|
272,293 |
For the second quarter and six months ended April 29, 2012, 2.6 million and 1.9 million weighted-average stock options, respectively, were not included in the computation of dilutive potential common shares since their inclusion would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per share, compared to 0.8 million and 1.0 million for the second quarter and six months ended May 1, 2011.
NOTE F COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Components of comprehensive income, net of taxes, are:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings |
|
$ |
128,935 |
|
$ |
110,702 |
|
$ |
258,268 |
|
$ |
260,737 |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Deferred (loss) gain on hedging |
|
(3,046) |
|
13,105 |
|
(7,557) |
|
25,286 | ||||
Reclassification adjustment into net earnings |
|
(2,336) |
|
(5,729) |
|
(9,116) |
|
(8,994) | ||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
531 |
|
2,207 |
|
1,124 |
|
2,337 | ||||
Pension and post-retirement benefits |
|
2,688 |
|
3,151 |
|
3,569 |
|
8,301 | ||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
(2,163) |
|
12,734 |
|
(11,980) |
|
26,930 | ||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
126,772 |
|
123,436 |
|
246,288 |
|
287,667 | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
1,078 |
|
1,162 |
|
2,052 |
|
2,451 | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Hormel Foods Corporation |
|
$ |
125,694 |
|
$ |
122,274 |
|
$ |
244,236 |
|
$ |
285,216 |
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
$ |
10,750 |
|
|
$ |
9,692 |
|
Pension & other benefits |
|
(198,614 |
) |
|
(202,183 |
) | ||
Deferred gain on hedging |
|
335 |
|
|
17,008 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(187,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(175,483 |
) |
NOTE G INVENTORIES
Principal components of inventories are:
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, | ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
Finished products |
|
$ |
489,356 |
|
$ |
463,491 |
Raw materials and work-in-process |
|
244,725 |
|
251,324 | ||
Materials and supplies |
|
178,591 |
|
171,008 | ||
Total |
|
$ |
912,672 |
|
$ |
885,823 |
NOTE H DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
The Company uses hedging programs to manage price risk associated with commodity purchases. These programs utilize futures contracts and swaps to manage the Companys exposure to price fluctuations in the commodities markets. The Company has determined that its programs which are designated as hedges are highly effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows generated by the items hedged.
Cash Flow Hedges: The Company utilizes corn and soybean meal futures to offset the price fluctuation in the Companys future direct grain purchases, and has entered into various swaps to hedge the purchases of grain and natural gas at certain plant locations. The financial instruments are designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges, and the Company measures the effectiveness of the hedges on a regular basis. Effective gains or losses related to these cash flow hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) and reclassified into earnings, through cost of products sold, in the period or periods in which the hedged transactions affect earnings. Any gains or losses related to hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in the current period cost of products sold. The Company typically does not hedge its grain or natural gas exposure beyond the next two upcoming fiscal years. As of April 29, 2012, and October 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding commodity futures contracts and swaps that were entered into to hedge forecasted purchases:
|
|
Volume |
| ||
Commodity |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
October 30, 2011 |
|
Corn |
|
14.8 million bushels |
|
20.8 million bushels |
|
Natural gas |
|
0.2 million MMBTUs |
|
0.5 million MMBTUs |
|
As of April 29, 2012, the Company has included in AOCL, hedging gains of $0.5 million (before tax) relating to these positions, compared to gains of $27.3 million (before tax) as of October 30, 2011. The Company expects to recognize the majority of these gains over the next 12 months. The balance as of April 29, 2012, includes gains of $2.6 million related to the Companys soybean meal futures contracts. These contracts were de-designated as cash flow hedges effective January 30, 2011, as they were no longer highly effective. These gains will remain in AOCL until the hedged transactions occur or it is probable the hedged transactions will not occur. Gains or losses related to these contracts after the date of de-designation have been recognized in earnings as incurred.
Fair Value Hedges: The Company utilizes futures to minimize the price risk assumed when forward priced contracts are offered to the Companys commodity suppliers. The intent of the program is to make the forward priced commodities cost nearly the same as cash market purchases at the date of delivery. The futures contracts are designated and accounted for as fair value hedges, and the Company measures the effectiveness of the hedges on a regular basis. Changes in the fair value of the futures contracts, along with the gain or loss on the hedged purchase commitment, are marked-to-market through earnings and are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as a current asset and liability, respectively. Effective gains or losses related to these fair value hedges are recognized through cost of products sold in the period or periods in which the hedged transactions affect earnings. Any gains or losses related to hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in the current period cost of products sold. As of April 29, 2012, and October 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding commodity futures contracts designated as fair value hedges:
|
|
Volume |
| ||
Commodity |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
October 30, 2011 |
|
Corn |
|
9.2 million bushels |
|
12.4 million bushels |
|
Lean hogs |
|
0.8 million cwt |
|
1.3 million cwt |
|
Other Derivatives: During fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the Company has held certain futures and options contract positions as part of a merchandising program and to manage the Companys exposure to fluctuations in commodity markets and foreign currencies. The Company has not applied hedge accounting to these positions.
Additionally, as of January 30, 2011, the Company de-designated its soybean meal futures contracts that were previously designated as cash flow hedges, as these contracts were no longer highly effective. Hedge accounting is no longer being applied to these contracts, and gains or losses occurring after the date of de-designation have been recognized in earnings as incurred.
As of April 29, 2012, and October 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding commodity futures contracts related to other programs:
|
|
Volume |
| ||
Commodity |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
October 30, 2011 |
|
Soybean meal |
|
- |
|
4,300 tons |
|
Fair Values: The fair values of the Companys derivative instruments (in thousands) as of April 29, 2012, and October 30, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value (1) | ||
|
|
Location on |
|
April 29, |
|
October 30, |
Asset Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ 15,959 |
|
$ 58,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
49 |
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ 16,008 |
|
$ 58,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ 523 |
|
$ 351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
$ 523 |
|
$ 351 |
(1) Amounts represent the gross fair value of derivative assets and liabilities. The Company nets the derivative assets and liabilities for each of its hedging programs, including cash collateral, when a master netting arrangement exists between the Company and the counterparty to the derivative contract. The amount or timing of cash collateral balances may impact the classification of the derivative in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. See Note I - Fair Value Measurements for a discussion of these net amounts as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Derivative Gains and Losses: Gains or losses (before tax, in thousands) related to the Companys derivative instruments for the second quarter ended April 29, 2012, and May 1, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |||||
Commodity contracts |
|
$ (4,843) |
|
$ 21,073 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
3,751 |
|
$ |
9,210 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
(2,247) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
$ |
(9,121) |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
(297) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
| ||||||||||
Derivatives Not |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
86 |
|
$ |
(2,363) |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
(191) |
|
|
|
| |||
Derivative Gains and Losses: Gains or losses (before tax, in thousands) related to the Companys derivative instruments for the six months ended April 29, 2012, and May 1, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Consolidated |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |||||||
Commodity contracts |
|
$ (12,085) |
|
$ 40,663 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
14,641 |
|
$ |
14,457 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
(5,328) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
Gain/(Loss) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
5,349 |
|
$ |
(11,664) |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
(419) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location on |
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
| |||||||||||
Derivatives Not |
|
|
|
|
|
Statements |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
(1,947) |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
(191) |
|
|
|
| |||||
(1) |
Amounts represent gains or losses in AOCL before tax. See Note F Comprehensive Income for the after tax impact of these gains or losses on net earnings. |
(2) |
There were no gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness during the second quarter or first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011. |
(3) |
There were no gains or losses resulting from the discontinuance of cash flow hedges during the second quarter or first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011. However, effective January 30, 2011, the Company de-designated and discontinued hedge accounting for its soybean meal futures contracts. At the date of de-designation of these hedges, gains of $17.7 million (before tax) were deferred in AOCL, with $2.6 million (before tax) remaining as of April 29, 2012. These gains will remain in AOCL until the hedged transactions occur or it is probable the hedged transactions will not occur. Gains or losses related to these contracts after the date of de-designation have been recognized in earnings as incurred. |
(4) |
Amounts represent losses on commodity contracts designated as fair value hedges that were closed during the second quarter or first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011, which were offset by a corresponding gain on the underlying hedged purchase commitment. Additional gains or losses related to changes in the fair value of open commodity contracts, along with the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged purchase commitment, are also marked-to-market through earnings with no impact on a net basis. |
(5) |
There were no gains or losses recognized as a result of a hedged firm commitment no longer qualifying as a fair value hedge during the second quarter or first six months of fiscal years 2012 and 2011. |
NOTE I FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Pursuant to the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), the Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value or discloses the fair value of certain assets and liabilities recorded at cost in the consolidated financial statements. Fair value is calculated as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires assets and liabilities measured at fair value to be categorized into one of three levels based on the inputs used in the
valuation. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs, other than those included in Level 1, based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect an entitys own assumptions about what inputs a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of April 29, 2012, and October 30, 2011, and their level within the fair value hierarchy, are presented in the tables below.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at April 29, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value at |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Assets at Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
342,440 |
|
$ |
342,440 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Short-term marketable securities (2) |
|
76,811 |
|
1,924 |
|
74,887 |
|
- |
| ||||
Other trading securities (3) |
|
108,017 |
|
35,906 |
|
72,111 |
|
- |
| ||||
Commodity derivatives (4) |
|
6,290 |
|
6,290 |
|
- |
|
- |
| ||||
Total Assets at Fair Value |
|
$ |
533,558 |
|
$ |
386,560 |
|
$ |
146,998 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities at Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commodity derivatives (4) |
|
$ |
523 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
523 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Deferred compensation (3) |
|
45,139 |
|
16,243 |
|
28,896 |
|
- |
| ||||
Total Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
$ |
45,662 |
|
$ |
16,243 |
|
$ |
29,419 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at October 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value at |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
| ||||
Assets at Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
341,447 |
|
$ |
341,447 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Short-term marketable securities (2) |
|
76,077 |
|
358 |
|
75,719 |
|
- |
| ||||
Other trading securities (3) |
|
105,367 |
|
34,588 |
|
70,779 |
|
- |
| ||||
Commodity derivatives (4) |
|
7,174 |
|
7,174 |
|
- |
|
- |
| ||||
Total Assets at Fair Value |
|
$ |
530,065 |
|
$ |
383,567 |
|
$ |
146,498 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities at Fair Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Commodity derivatives (4) |
|
$ |
351 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
351 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Deferred compensation (3) |
|
44,956 |
|
15,379 |
|
29,577 |
|
- |
| ||||
Total Liabilities at Fair Value |
|
$ |
45,307 |
|
$ |
15,379 |
|
$ |
29,928 |
|
$ |
- |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the financial assets and liabilities above:
(1) The Companys cash equivalents consist of money market funds rated AAA. As these investments have a maturity date of three months or less, the carrying value approximates fair value.
(2) The Company holds trading securities as part of a portfolio maintained to generate investment income and to provide cash for operations of the Company, if necessary. The portfolio is managed by a third party who is responsible for daily trading activities, and all assets within the portfolio are highly liquid. The cash, U.S. government securities, and highly rated money market funds held by the portfolio are classified as Level 1. The current investment portfolio also includes corporate bonds, international government securities, commercial paper, agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other asset-backed securities for which there is an active, quoted market. Market prices are obtained from a variety of industry standard providers, large financial institutions, and other third-party sources to calculate a representative daily market value, and therefore, these securities are classified as Level 2.
(3) The Company also holds trading securities as part of a rabbi trust to fund certain supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans. The rabbi trust is included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and is valued based on the underlying fair value of each fund held by the trust. A portion of the funds held related to the supplemental executive retirement plans have been invested in fixed income funds managed by a third party. The declared rate on these funds is set based on a formula using the yield of the general account investment portfolio that supports the fund, adjusted for expenses and other charges. The rate is guaranteed for one year at issue, and may be reset annually on the policy anniversary, subject to a guaranteed minimum rate. As the value is based on adjusted market rates, and the fixed rate is only reset on an annual basis, these funds are classified as Level 2. The remaining funds held are also managed by a third party, and include equity securities, money market accounts, bond funds, or other portfolios for which there is an active quoted market. Therefore these securities are classified as Level 1. The related deferred compensation liabilities are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and are valued based on the underlying investment selections held in each participants account. Investment options generally mirror those funds held by the rabbi trust, for which there is an active quoted market. Therefore these investment balances are classified as Level 1. The Company also offers a fixed rate investment option to participants. The rate earned on these investments is adjusted annually based on a specified percentage of the United States Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) Applicable Federal Rates in effect and therefore these balances are classified as Level 2.
(4) The Companys commodity derivatives represent futures contracts, option contracts, and swaps used in its hedging or other programs to offset price fluctuations associated with purchases of corn, soybean meal, and natural gas, and to minimize the price risk assumed when forward priced contracts are offered to the Companys commodity suppliers. The Companys futures and options contracts for corn and soybean meal are traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, while futures contracts for lean hogs are traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. These are active markets with quoted prices available and therefore these contracts are classified as Level 1. The Companys natural gas swaps are settled based on quoted prices from the New York Mercantile Exchange. As the swaps settle based on quoted market prices, but are not held directly with the exchange, the swaps are classified as Level 2. All derivatives are reviewed for potential credit risk and risk of nonperformance. The Company nets the derivative assets and liabilities for each of its hedging programs, including cash collateral, when a master netting arrangement exists between the Company and the counterparty to the derivative contract. The net balance for each program is included in other current assets or accounts payable, as appropriate, in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. As of April 29, 2012, the Company has recognized the right to reclaim cash collateral of $1.2 million from, and the obligation to return cash collateral of $10.9 million to, various counterparties. As of October 30, 2011, the Company had recognized the right to reclaim cash collateral of $20.1 million from, and the obligation to return cash collateral of $71.8 million to, various counterparties.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities also include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other liabilities, for which carrying value approximates fair value. The Company does not carry its long-term debt at fair value in its Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Based on borrowing rates available to the Company for long-term financing with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of long-term debt, utilizing discounted cash flows (Level 2), was $277.3 million as of April 29, 2012, and $266.9 million as of October 30, 2011.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company also measures certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value that are recognized or disclosed on a nonrecurring basis (e.g. goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment). During the six months ended April 29, 2012, and May 1, 2011, there were no material remeasurements of assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition.
NOTE J PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Net periodic benefit cost for pension and other post-retirement benefit plans consists of the following:
|
|
Pension Benefits |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
| ||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
5,856 |
|
$ |
6,051 |
|
$ |
11,712 |
|
$ |
12,103 |
|
Interest cost |
|
12,284 |
|
12,571 |
|
24,568 |
|
25,141 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(17,128) |
|
(15,748) |
|
(34,255) |
|
(31,495) |
| ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(1,270) |
|
(151) |
|
(2,540) |
|
(303) |
| ||||
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
5,033 |
|
4,158 |
|
10,065 |
|
8,316 |
| ||||
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
4,775 |
|
$ |
6,881 |
|
$ |
9,550 |
|
$ |
13,762 |
|
|
|
Post-retirement Benefits |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
|
April 29, 2012 |
|
May 1, 2011 |
| ||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
556 |
|
$ |
543 |
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
$ |
1,085 |
|
Interest cost |
|
4,437 |
|
4,683 |
|
8,875 |
|
9,366 |
| ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
883 |
|
1,074 |
|
1,796 |
|
2,193 |
| ||||
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
| ||||
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
5,875 |
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
$ |
11,781 |
|
$ |
12,642 |
|
NOTE K INCOME TAXES
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, at April 29, 2012, recorded in other long-term liabilities was $28.3 million, of which $18.5 million would impact the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. The Company includes accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense, with $0.2 million and $0.3 million included in expense in the second quarter and first six months, respectively, of fiscal 2012. The amount of accrued interest and penalties at April 29, 2012, associated with unrecognized tax benefits was $6.6 million.
The Company is regularly audited by federal and state taxing authorities. During fiscal year 2012, the I.R.S. concluded its examination of the Companys consolidated federal income tax returns for the fiscal years through 2009. The Company is in various stages of audit by several state taxing authorities on a variety of fiscal years, as far back as 2004. While it is reasonably possible that one or more of these audits may be completed within the next 12 months and that the related unrecognized tax benefits may change, based on the status of the examinations it is not possible to reasonably estimate the effect of any amount of such change to previously recorded uncertain tax positions.
NOTE L SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company develops, processes, and distributes a wide array of food products in a variety of markets. The Company reports its results in the following five segments: Grocery Products, Refrigerated Foods, Jennie-O Turkey Store, Specialty Foods, and All Other.
The Grocery Products segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of shelf-stable food products sold predominantly in the retail market. This segment also includes the results from the Companys MegaMex joint venture.
The Refrigerated Foods segment includes the Hormel Refrigerated operating segment and the Affiliated Business Units. This segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of branded and unbranded pork and beef products for retail, foodservice, and fresh product customers. The Affiliated Business Units include the Farmer John, Burke Corporation, Dans Prize, Saags Products, Inc., and Precept Foods businesses. Precept Foods, LLC, is a 50.01 percent owned joint venture.
The Jennie-O Turkey Store segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of branded and unbranded turkey products for retail, foodservice, and fresh product customers.
The Specialty Foods segment includes the Diamond Crystal Brands, Century Foods International, and Hormel Specialty Products operating segments. This segment consists of the packaging and sale of various sugar and sugar substitute products, salt and pepper products, liquid portion products, dessert mixes, ready-to-drink products, sports nutrition products, gelatin products, and private label canned meats to retail and foodservice customers. This segment also includes the processing, marketing, and sale of nutritional food products and supplements to hospitals, nursing homes, and other marketers of nutritional products.
The All Other segment includes the Hormel Foods International operating segment, which manufactures, markets, and sells Company products internationally. This segment also includes the results from the Companys international joint ventures and miscellaneous corporate sales.
Intersegment sales are recorded at prices that approximate cost and are eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company does not allocate investment income, interest expense, and interest income to its segments when measuring performance. The Company also retains various other income and unallocated expenses at corporate. Equity in earnings of affiliates is included in segment operating profit; however, earnings attributable to the Companys noncontrolling interests are excluded. These items are included below as net interest and investment expense (income), general corporate expense, and noncontrolling interest when reconciling to earnings before income taxes.
Sales and operating profits for each of the Companys reportable segments and reconciliation to earnings before income taxes are set forth below. The Company is an integrated enterprise, characterized by substantial intersegment cooperation, cost allocations, and sharing of assets. Therefore, the Company does not represent that these segments, if operated independently, would report the operating profit and other financial information shown below.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
| ||||||||
Sales to Unaffiliated Customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
263,993 |
|
|
$ |
260,273 |
|
|
$ |
533,472 |
|
|
$ |
537,172 |
|
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
|
1,031,975 |
|
|
|
1,040,624 |
|
|
|
2,115,500 |
|
|
|
2,051,326 |
|
|
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
|
391,053 |
|
|
|
365,953 |
|
|
|
768,424 |
|
|
|
730,470 |
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
228,947 |
|
|
|
205,001 |
|
|
|
446,971 |
|
|
|
396,346 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
96,891 |
|
|
|
87,190 |
|
|
|
187,931 |
|
|
|
165,285 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,012,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,041 |
|
|
$ |
4,052,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,880,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
5,452 |
|
|
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
|
32,585 |
|
|
|
33,885 |
|
|
|
62,720 |
|
|
|
61,143 |
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,742 |
|
|
$ |
37,123 |
|
|
$ |
68,331 |
|
|
$ |
66,677 |
|
|
Intersegment elimination |
|
|
(35,742 |
) |
|
|
(37,123 |
) |
|
|
(68,331 |
) |
|
|
(66,677 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
263,993 |
|
|
$ |
260,273 |
|
|
$ |
533,472 |
|
|
$ |
537,172 |
|
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
|
1,035,106 |
|
|
|
1,043,822 |
|
|
|
2,121,044 |
|
|
|
2,056,778 |
|
|
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
|
423,638 |
|
|
|
399,838 |
|
|
|
831,144 |
|
|
|
791,613 |
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
228,973 |
|
|
|
205,041 |
|
|
|
447,038 |
|
|
|
396,428 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
96,891 |
|
|
|
87,190 |
|
|
|
187,931 |
|
|
|
165,285 |
|
|
Intersegment elimination |
|
|
(35,742 |
) |
|
|
(37,123 |
) |
|
|
(68,331 |
) |
|
|
(66,677 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,012,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,041 |
|
|
$ |
4,052,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,880,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
42,858 |
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
86,951 |
|
|
$ |
87,610 |
|
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
|
53,009 |
|
|
|
70,250 |
|
|
|
106,758 |
|
|
|
166,384 |
|
|
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
|
70,198 |
|
|
|
46,703 |
|
|
|
146,960 |
|
|
|
120,528 |
|
|
Specialty Foods |
|
|
20,859 |
|
|
|
19,164 |
|
|
|
37,506 |
|
|
|
36,442 |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
12,855 |
|
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
25,326 |
|
|
|
18,437 |
|
|
Total segment operating profit |
|
$ |
199,779 |
|
|
$ |
183,609 |
|
|
$ |
403,501 |
|
|
$ |
429,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and investment expense (income) |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
General corporate expense |
|
|
6,088 |
|
|
|
11,969 |
|
|
|
14,815 |
|
|
|
23,221 |
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
193,794 |
|
|
$ |
167,548 |
|
|
$ |
388,103 |
|
|
$ |
397,159 |
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
There have been no material changes in the Companys Critical Accounting Policies, as disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011.
The Company is a processor of branded and unbranded food products for retail, foodservice, and fresh product customers. It operates in five reportable segments as described in Note L in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reported record net earnings per diluted share of $0.48, an increase of 20.0 percent compared to $0.40 per diluted share in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Significant factors impacting the second quarter of fiscal 2012 were:
· Jennie-O Turkey Store reported another excellent quarter, driven by strong value-added sales and operational efficiencies.
· Refrigerated Foods experienced a substantial decline in segment profit, reflecting continued unfavorable pork operating margins.
· Robust export sales of fresh pork and the SPAM family of products generated notable profit gains for the All Other segment.
· Grocery Products segment profit increased as a result of improved sales and lower pork and beef input costs.
· Profitability improved for Specialty Foods as pricing actions taken earlier in the year offset higher raw material costs.
Net earnings attributable to the Company for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 increased 16.7 percent to $127.9 million compared to $109.6 million net earnings attributable to the Company in the same quarter of fiscal 2011. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter increased 20.0 percent to $0.48 from $0.40 diluted earnings per share last year. Net earnings attributable to the Company for the first six months of fiscal 2012 decreased 0.8 percent to $256.3 million compared to $258.4 million net earnings attributable to the Company in fiscal 2011. Diluted earnings per share for the same period were $0.95 in fiscal 2012, even with the prior year.
Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 increased 2.7 percent to $2.01 billion, versus $1.96 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Tonnage decreased 2.1 percent to 1.20 billion lbs. for the second quarter compared to 1.22 billion lbs. in the same quarter of last year. Net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2012 increased 4.4 percent to $4.05 billion from $3.88 billion in the first six months of fiscal 2011. Tonnage for the first six months of fiscal 2012 decreased 2.1 percent to 2.41 billion lbs. compared to 2.46 billion lbs. in 2011. Four of the five reporting segments of the Company generated top line growth during the second quarter. Value-added sales for Jennie-O Turkey Store and Specialty Foods were particularly strong compared to the prior year, and the retail and foodservice business units within Refrigerated Foods also reported gains for the quarter. Despite some ongoing softness in center-of-the-store sales, the Grocery Products segment also generated an overall increase through growth in sales of SPAM and the MegaMex portfolio of Mexican foods. Export sales by the Companys International business have continued to be robust in fiscal 2012, which also contributed to the improved top-line results. Tonnage reductions for the first half primarily reflect reduced commodity meat sales in both the Refrigerated Foods and Jennie-O Turkey Store segments in fiscal 2012, as well as the ongoing impact of pricing advances taken across the Company in recent quarters.
Gross profit for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 was $335.6 million and $673.0 million, respectively, compared to $326.2 million and $700.2 million for the same periods last year. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the second quarter remained flat at 16.7 percent compared to the prior year, and decreased to 16.6 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012 from 18.0 percent for the comparable six months of fiscal 2011. The spread between hog costs and primal values has remained well below prior year levels throughout the first six months of the year, resulting in substantial declines in pork operating margins compared to fiscal 2011. Improved margins for Jennie-O Turkey Store and the Companys international export business were able to offset these declines for the second quarter, but have been unable to fully compensate for the sizable year-over-year margin declines that have been incurred in the first half of fiscal 2012. Additionally, shipping and handling expenses to date in fiscal 2012 have increased across all segments of the Company. The Companys value-added businesses within the Grocery Products and Refrigerated Foods segments did generate some margin improvement during the second quarter as a result of lower pork and beef raw material costs.
Entering the second half of the fiscal year, the Company anticipates that pork operating margins will gradually improve yet remain below prior year levels. Declines in commodity turkey values and higher grain input costs may also temper the margin gains that Jennie-O Turkey Store has experienced in recent quarters. The international export environment is expected to remain positive, which should continue to benefit margins throughout the remainder of the fiscal year. The Company will also continue to focus on expanding value-added sales and leveraging operational efficiencies to enhance margins, and believes comparative results will be positive in the latter half of the year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 were $148.7 million and $301.2 million, respectively, compared to $160.1 million and $305.3 million for the same periods last year. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 7.4 percent for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to 8.2 percent and 7.9 percent for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, in fiscal 2011. Pension and insurance related expenses decreased significantly for both the second quarter and six months compared to the prior year, offsetting increases in brokerage and research and development expenses. Advertising expenses have also decreased during the first half of fiscal 2012. However, media support for the Companys key Hormel branded items is ongoing, and new campaigns to support the Companys SPAM and Jennie-O Turkey Store brands will gain momentum in the latter half of the year. The Company expects selling, general and administrative expenses to be approximately 7.5 percent of net sales for the full year in fiscal 2012.
Equity in earnings of affiliates was $7.8 million and $18.8 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to $6.7 million and $13.6 million last year. Strong results from the Companys 50 percent owned MegaMex joint venture have been a primary driver of the increase for both the second quarter and first six months compared to the prior year. The Companys 40 percent owned Philippine joint venture, Purefoods-Hormel Company, also reported improved results for the first six months of fiscal 2012, which have offset declines for the Companys other international joint ventures.
The effective tax rate for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 was 33.5 percent, respectively, compared to 33.9 and 34.3 percent for the comparable quarter and six months of fiscal 2011. The lower rate for the first six months of fiscal 2012 is primarily due to net favorable discrete items in the first quarter related to state and federal audit settlements for prior periods. The Company expects a full-year effective tax rate between 33.5 and 34.5 percent for fiscal 2012.
Net sales and operating profits for each of the Companys reportable segments are set forth below. The Company is an integrated enterprise, characterized by substantial intersegment cooperation, cost allocations, and sharing of assets. Therefore, the Company does not represent that these segments, if operated independently, would report the operating profit and other financial information shown below. Additional segment financial information can be found in Note L of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
% |
|
April 29, |
|
May 1, |
|
% |
| ||||||||||
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
263,993 |
|
|
$ |
260,273 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
533,472 |
|
|
$ |
537,172 |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
1,031,975 |
|
|
1,040,624 |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
2,115,500 |
|
|
2,051,326 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
| ||||
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
391,053 |
|
|
365,953 |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
768,424 |
|
|
730,470 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
| ||||
Specialty Foods |
|
228,947 |
|
|
205,001 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
446,971 |
|
|
396,346 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
| ||||
All Other |
|
96,891 |
|
|
87,190 |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
187,931 |
|
|
165,285 |
|
|
13.7 |
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,012,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,041 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,052,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,880,599 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Segment Operating Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Grocery Products |
|
$ |
42,858 |
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
86,951 |
|
|
$ |
87,610 |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Refrigerated Foods |
|
53,009 |
|
|
70,250 |
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
106,758 |
|
|
166,384 |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
| ||||
Jennie-O Turkey Store |
|
70,198 |
|
|
46,703 |
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
146,960 |
|
|
120,528 |
|
|
21.9 |
|
| ||||
Specialty Foods |
|
20,859 |
|
|
19,164 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
37,506 |
|
|
36,442 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
| ||||
All Other |
|
12,855 |
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
25,326 |
|
|
18,437 |
|
|
37.4 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total segment operating profit |
|
$ |
199,779 |
|
|
$ |
183,609 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
403,501 |
|
|
$ |
429,401 |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
Net interest and investment expense (income) |
|
945 |
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
(81.9 |
) |
|
2,569 |
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
(77.4 |
) |
| ||||
General corporate expense |
|
6,088 |
|
|
11,969 |
|
|
(49.1 |
) |
|
14,815 |
|
|
23,221 |
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
| ||||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
1,048 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
1,986 |
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
193,794 |
|
|
$ |
167,548 |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
$ |
388,103 |
|
|
$ |
397,159 |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Grocery Products
The Grocery Products segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of shelf-stable food products sold predominantly in the retail market. This segment also includes the results from the Companys MegaMex joint venture.
Grocery Products net sales increased 1.4 percent and decreased 0.7 percent for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to the same fiscal 2011 periods. Tonnage decreased 2.9 percent for the second quarter and 4.6 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year. This segment again experienced some softness in center-of-the-store sales during the second quarter, but did see some improvement compared to the first quarter. Gains were reported for the SPAM family of products during the quarter, aided by an advertising campaign featuring a new animated character, Sir Can-A-Lot. Additional advertising support will accompany the 75th anniversary of SPAM this year, and the product line is still enjoying growth both in the U.S. and abroad. Offsetting these gains were reduced sales of Dinty Moore stew and Hormel bacon toppings. Hormel Compleats microwave meals also experienced declines during the second quarter, as did the entire microwave meals category. New product packaging and several new product varieties for this line should be fully reflected in retail stores beginning this summer. Additional advertising support of the Hormel brand should also enhance top-line results for this product line in the latter half of the year.
Sales results for the MegaMex joint venture continued to grow throughout the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Beginning in the third quarter, the Companys retail sales force will be assuming responsibility for sales of the portfolio of products offered by Don Miguel Foods Corp. (additional product lines within the MegaMex joint venture). These sales will then be reported in the Grocery Products segment, and will enhance top-line comparative results in the latter half of the fiscal year. Sales related to this integrated product line for the second half are estimated to be $80 to $90 million.
Segment profit for Grocery Products increased 9.8 percent for the second quarter and decreased 0.8 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2011. Profit results for the quarter benefitted from lower pork and beef input costs, which offset volume declines across several core product lines. Improved equity in earnings results from the MegaMex joint venture also contributed to the improved profitability. Looking forward, the Company expects input costs to normalize to historical levels in the latter half of the year. Additionally, this segment remains focused on new product efforts and ongoing advertising support for its core Hormel and SPAM brands, which should contribute to improved profit results as the year progresses.
Refrigerated Foods
The Refrigerated Foods segment includes the Hormel Refrigerated operating segment and the Affiliated Business Units. This segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of branded and unbranded pork and beef products for retail, foodservice, and fresh product customers. The Affiliated Business Units include the Farmer John, Burke Corporation, Dans Prize, Saags Products, Inc., and Precept Foods businesses. Precept Foods, LLC, is a 50.01 percent owned joint venture.
Net sales for the Refrigerated Foods segment decreased 0.8 percent and increased 3.1 percent for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods of fiscal 2011. Tonnage decreased 3.8 percent and 2.0 percent for the second quarter and first six months compared to the prior year. Declines for the second quarter primarily reflect lower sales of commodity pork items, as harvest levels were reduced in order to limit the Companys exposure to unfavorable pork operating margins. However, top-line gains were reported across several key value-added product categories.
Within the Meat Products retail business, notable sales gains were reported in the second quarter for Hormel Natural Choice deli meats, Hormel party trays, Hormel pepperoni, and DiLusso deli products. Foodservice sales were also strong for the quarter, particularly for Natural Choice deli meats, Café H ethnic meats, and Hormel premium bacon. Advertising campaigns supporting the Hormel brand have benefitted top-line results across the segment to date, and that growth is expected to continue throughout fiscal 2012.
Segment profit for Refrigerated Foods decreased 24.5 percent and 35.8 percent for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to the prior year. Pork operating margins have been unfavorable since late in the first quarter and have remained significantly below prior year levels throughout the first six months of the year, resulting in substantial losses compared to fiscal 2011. Some benefit was realized in the second quarter due to lower pork raw material costs and improved value-added sales, but these gains were not enough to offset the losses incurred in operations.
Entering the second half of the year, the Company expects comparative sales and profit results for Refrigerated Foods to gradually improve. Pork operating margins are expected to remain below prior year and historical levels, while the Companys value-added business should benefit from improvement in raw material costs. Ongoing brand campaigns should further enhance retail value-added sales within this segment in the second half of the year, and the foodservice business anticipates additional growth as the industry experiences gradual improvement.
Jennie-O Turkey Store
The Jennie-O Turkey Store (JOTS) segment consists primarily of the processing, marketing, and sale of branded and unbranded turkey products for retail, foodservice, and fresh product customers.
JOTS net sales increased 6.9 percent and 5.2 percent for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, versus the comparable periods of fiscal 2011. Tonnage decreased 2.5 percent for the second quarter and 4.8 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to fiscal 2011 results. The top-line gains reflect improved value-added sales, with Jennie-O Turkey Store retail tray pack items and turkey burgers showing particular strength to date in fiscal 2012. This segment continues to benefit from the Make the Switch marketing campaign that ran in the latter half of fiscal 2011. Reduced commodity meat sales, softer deli sales, and a shift in the timing of holiday sales of whole birds to later in the fiscal year, offset a portion of the retail value-added sales growth and contributed to the tonnage declines for both the second quarter and six months compared to fiscal 2011.
JOTS has continued to generate excellent profit results to date in fiscal 2012, with segment profit up 50.3 percent for the second quarter and 21.9 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year. The increased value-added business noted above was a key driver of the increased profitability, reflecting the continued benefit of successful marketing campaigns and pricing initiatives. Higher whole bird pricing and the favorable impact of ongoing efficiency gains across the business also contributed to the strong results, offsetting declines in commodity meat margins resulting from lower volumes and reduced pricing in the current year. Higher, more volatile grain markets experienced throughout the second quarter were partially mitigated by the Companys hedging programs, but are expected to remain a challenge entering the third quarter.
Entering the second half of fiscal 2012, declines in commodity turkey values and higher grain input costs may slow the gains for this segment. The Company expects that the strength of its value-added sales, favorable whole bird pricing, and the continued benefit from operational efficiencies will be able to offset the impact of these items in the latter half of the year, but year-over-year growth is not likely to be as robust as it has been in recent quarters.
Specialty Foods
The Specialty Foods segment includes the Diamond Crystal Brands (DCB), Century Foods International (CFI), and Hormel Specialty Products (HSP) operating segments. This segment consists of the packaging and sale of various sugar and sugar substitute products, salt and pepper products, liquid portion products, dessert mixes, ready-to-drink products, sports nutrition products, gelatin products, and private label canned meats to retail and foodservice customers. This segment also includes the processing, marketing, and sale of nutritional food products and supplements to hospitals, nursing homes, and other marketers of nutritional products.
Specialty Foods net sales increased 11.7 percent for the second quarter and 12.8 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to the same periods of fiscal 2011. Tonnage increased 1.6 percent for the second quarter and 1.5 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year. Strong sales of bulk and nutritional products at CFI were a key driver of the increase, reflecting successful efforts to diversify the customer base. Tonnage gains remained more modest, reflecting product mix changes and the impact of pricing initiatives. Sales of private label canned meats and ingredients also increased for HSP for the second quarter compared to the prior year, while DCB sales declined due to lower sales of sugar substitutes and other core products.
Specialty Foods segment profit increased 8.8 percent for the second quarter and 2.9 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to fiscal 2011 results. Pricing actions taken in prior quarters in response to higher input costs began to positively impact results during the second quarter. Some improvement in pork raw material costs was also experienced late in the quarter and should continue to enhance margins entering the second half of the year. Improvements in product mix and the customer base have also contributed to the profit growth in the current year compared to fiscal 2011.
Looking forward, the Company expects Specialty Foods to continue its positive momentum. Efforts are ongoing to secure new business and leverage operational efficiencies across the business, which should continue to drive segment profit growth in the latter half of fiscal 2012.
All Other
The All Other segment includes the Hormel Foods International (HFI) operating segment, which manufactures, markets, and sells Company products internationally. This segment also includes the results from the Companys international joint ventures and miscellaneous corporate sales.
All Other net sales increased 11.1 percent and 13.7 percent for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, as compared to fiscal 2011. Strong export sales of fresh pork and the SPAM family of products through HFI were the principal drivers of the top-line results for both the second quarter and six months compared to the prior year. Segment profit also increased significantly, up 52.2 percent for the second quarter and 37.4 percent for the first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to fiscal 2011 results. Strong volumes and lower pork raw material costs generated year-over-year profit gains during the second quarter. Results for both the Companys China operations and its Philippine joint venture, Purefoods-Hormel Company, also improved during the second quarter and contributed to the increased profit results.
The Company expects HFI to continue to provide strong earnings growth in upcoming quarters, as pork exports are expected to remain robust during the remainder of the fiscal year. Ongoing branding and marketing efforts are also providing a benefit and should enhance profits for this segment going forward.
Unallocated Income and Expenses
The Company does not allocate investment income, interest expense, and interest income to its segments when measuring performance. The Company also retains various other income and unallocated expenses at corporate. Equity in earnings of affiliates is included in segment operating profit; however, earnings attributable to the Companys noncontrolling interests are excluded. These items are included in the segment table for the purpose of reconciling segment results to earnings before income taxes.
Net interest and investment expense (income) for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 was a net expense of $0.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, compared to a net expense of $5.2 million and $11.4 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease for both the second quarter and six months primarily reflects lower interest expense, resulting from reduced debt levels and interest rates compared to fiscal 2011. Interest expense of $6.5 million for the first six months of fiscal 2012 decreased from $13.8 million in the prior year, and the Company anticipates that interest expense will approximate $12.0 to $14.0 million for the full year in fiscal 2012. For the first six months, improved returns on the Companys rabbi trust for supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans also contributed to the overall expense decrease compared to the prior year.
General corporate expense for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 was $6.1 million and $14.8 million, respectively, compared to $12.0 million and $23.2 million for the comparable periods of fiscal 2011. Lower pension and insurance expenses contributed to the decrease for both the quarter and six months in fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year. Higher compensation related expenses were also incurred in the first half of fiscal 2011, partially due to the prior year vesting of options under the Universal Stock Option award granted to all employees in 2007.
Net earnings attributable to the Companys noncontrolling interests were $1.0 million and $2.0 million for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, compared to $1.1 million and $2.3 million for the comparable periods of fiscal 2011. The decreases to date in fiscal 2012 primarily reflect lower results for the Companys Precept Foods business.
There has been no material change in the information regarding Related Party Transactions that was disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents were $524.8 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2012 compared to $913.7 million at the end of the comparable fiscal 2011 period.
Cash provided by operating activities was $213.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $275.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2011. The combination of lower earnings and higher working capital balances has generated the decrease for fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year.
Cash used in investing activities increased to $51.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 from $32.5 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2011. Capital expenditures in the first six months of fiscal 2012 have increased to $58.2 million from $35.9 million in the comparable six months of fiscal 2011. The Company currently estimates its fiscal 2012 capital expenditures will be approximately $120.0 to $130.0 million.
Cash used in financing activities was $100.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $200.9 million in the same period of fiscal 2011. The significant decrease in cash flows was driven by the Companys issuance of $250.0 million of 4.125% Notes due in 2021 that occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Additionally, proceeds generated from the Companys stock option plan exercises decreased $33.7 million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to the prior year vesting of options under the Universal Stock Option award granted to all employees in 2007. The Company also used $42.1 million for common stock repurchases in the first six months of fiscal 2012, compared to $34.7 million in the same period of the prior year. For additional information pertaining to the Companys share repurchase plans or programs, see Part II, Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Cash dividends paid to the Companys shareholders also continue to be an ongoing financing activity for the Company. Dividends paid in the first six months of 2012 were $73.2 million compared to $61.9 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2011. For fiscal 2012, the annual dividend rate was increased to $0.60 per share, representing the 46th consecutive annual dividend increase. The Company has paid dividends for 335 consecutive quarters and expects to continue doing so.
The Company is required, by certain covenants in its debt agreements, to maintain specified levels of financial ratios and financial position. At the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of these debt covenants.
Cash flows from operating activities continue to provide the Company with its principal source of liquidity. The Company does not anticipate a significant risk to cash flows from this source in the foreseeable future because the Company operates in a relatively stable industry and has strong brands across many product lines.
Maximizing the value returned to shareholders through dividend payments remains a priority for use of the Companys strong cash position in fiscal 2012. Additional share repurchase activity and capital spending to enhance and expand current operations is also expected to continue throughout the year. The Company also remains well positioned to take advantage of strategic acquisition opportunities and continues to evaluate options in that area.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The Company records income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The Company is unable to determine its contractual obligations by year related to this pronouncement, as the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of its reserves for income taxes cannot be reasonably estimated. The total liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, at April 29, 2012, was $28.3 million.
There have been no other material changes to the information regarding the Companys future contractual financial obligations that was disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company currently provides a renewable standby letter of credit for $4.8 million to guarantee obligations that may arise under workers compensation claims of an affiliated party. This potential obligation is not reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
This report contains forward-looking information within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking information may include statements concerning the Companys outlook for the future as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans, strategies, or anticipated events and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information. The Company is filing this cautionary statement in connection with the Reform Act. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Companys Annual Report to Stockholders, other filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), the Companys press releases, and oral statements made by the Companys representatives, the words or phrases should result, believe, intend, plan, are expected to, targeted, will continue, will approximate, is anticipated, estimate, project, or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those anticipated or projected.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Reform Act, the Company is identifying risk factors that could affect financial performance and cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods. The discussion of risk factors in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain cautionary statements regarding the Companys business, which should be considered by investors and others. Such risk factors should be considered in conjunction with any discussions of operations or results by the Company or its representatives, including any forward-looking discussion, as well as comments contained in press releases, presentations to securities analysts or investors, or other communications by the Company.
In making these statements, the Company is not undertaking, and specifically declines to undertake, any obligation to address or update each or any factor in future filings or communications regarding the Companys business or results, and is not undertaking to address how any of these factors may have caused changes to discussions or information contained in previous filings or communications. Though the Company has attempted to list comprehensively these important cautionary risk factors, the Company wishes to caution investors and others that other factors may in the future prove to be important in affecting the Companys business or results of operations.
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which represent current views as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are inherently at risk to any changes in the national and worldwide economic environment, which could include, among other things, economic conditions, political developments, currency exchange rates, interest and inflation rates, accounting standards, taxes, and laws and regulations affecting the Company and its markets.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Hog Markets: The Companys earnings are affected by fluctuations in the live hog market. To minimize the impact on earnings, and to ensure a steady supply of quality hogs, the Company has entered into contracts with producers for the purchase of hogs at formula-based prices over periods of up to 10 years. Purchased hogs under contract accounted for 98 percent and 95 percent of the total hogs purchased by the Company during the first six months of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. The majority of these contracts use market-based formulas based on hog futures, hog primal values, or industry reported hog markets. Under normal, long-term market conditions, changes in the cash hog market are offset by proportional changes in primal values. Therefore, a hypothetical 10 percent change in the cash hog market would have had an immaterial effect on the Companys results of operations.
Certain procurement contracts allow for future hog deliveries (firm commitments) to be forward priced. The Company generally hedges these firm commitments by using hog futures contracts. These futures contracts are designated and accounted for as fair value hedges. The change in the market value of such futures contracts is highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item, and the Company evaluates the effectiveness of the contracts on a regular basis. Changes in the fair value of the futures contracts, along with the gain or loss on the firm commitment, are marked-to-market through earnings and are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as a current asset and liability, respectively. The fair value of the Companys open futures contracts as of April 29, 2012, was $6.9 million compared to $(3.1) million as of October 30, 2011.
The Company measures its market risk exposure on its hog futures contracts using a sensitivity analysis, which considers a hypothetical 10 percent change in market prices. A 10 percent increase in market prices would have negatively impacted the fair value of the Companys April 29, 2012, open contracts by $6.9 million, which in turn would lower the Companys future cost of purchased hogs by a similar amount.
Turkey and Hog Production Costs: The Company raises or contracts for live turkeys and hogs to meet some of its raw material supply requirements. Production costs in raising turkeys and hogs are subject primarily to fluctuations in feed prices, and to a lesser extent, fuel costs. Under normal, long-term market conditions, changes in the cost to produce turkeys and hogs are offset by proportional changes in their respective markets.
To reduce the Companys exposure to changes in grain prices, the Company utilizes a hedge program to offset the fluctuation in the Companys future direct grain purchases. This program currently utilizes corn futures, and these contracts are accounted for under cash flow hedge accounting. The open contracts are reported at their fair value with an unrealized loss of $1.4 million, before tax, on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of April 29, 2012, compared to an unrealized gain of $13.7 million, before tax, as of October 30, 2011.
The Company measures its market risk exposure on its grain futures contracts using a sensitivity analysis, which considers a hypothetical 10 percent change in the market prices for grain. A 10 percent decrease in the market price for grain would have negatively impacted the fair value of the Companys April 29, 2012, open grain contracts by $8.4 million, which in turn would lower the Companys future cost on purchased grain by a similar amount.
Natural Gas: Production costs at the Companys plants and feed mills are also subject to fluctuations in fuel costs. To reduce the Companys exposure to changes in natural gas prices, the Company utilizes a hedge program to offset the fluctuation in the Companys future natural gas purchases. This program utilizes natural gas swaps, and these contracts are accounted for under cash flow hedge accounting. The open contracts are reported at their fair value with an unrealized loss of $0.5 million, before tax, on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of April 29, 2012, compared to an unrealized loss of $0.4 million, before tax, as of October 30, 2011.
The Company measures its market risk exposure on its natural gas contracts using a sensitivity analysis, which considers a hypothetical 10 percent change in the market prices for natural gas. A 10 percent decrease in the market price for natural gas would have negatively impacted the fair value of the Companys April 29, 2012, open natural gas contracts by an immaterial amount, which in turn would lower the Companys future cost on natural gas purchases by a similar amount.
Long-Term Debt: A principal market risk affecting the Company is the exposure to changes in interest rates on the Companys fixed-rate, long-term debt. Market risk for fixed-rate, long-term debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value, resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent decrease in interest rates, and amounts to approximately $5.9 million. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt was estimated using discounted future cash flows based on the Companys incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Investments: The Company holds trading securities as part of a rabbi trust to fund certain supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans, and as part of an investment portfolio. As of April 29, 2012, the balance of these securities totaled $184.8 million. A portion of these securities represent fixed income funds. The Company is subject to market risk due to fluctuations in the value of the remaining investments, as unrealized gains and losses associated with these securities are included in the Companys net earnings on a mark-to-market basis. A 10 percent decline in the value of the investments not held in fixed income funds would have a direct negative impact to the Companys pretax earnings of approximately $11.3 million, while a 10 percent increase in value would have a positive impact of the same amount.
International: While the Company does have international operations and operates in international markets, it considers its market risk in such activities to be immaterial.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information the Company is required to disclose in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Controls.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, there has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings related to the on-going operation of its business, including claims both by and against the Company. At any time, such proceedings typically involve claims related to product liability, contract disputes, wage and hour laws, employment practices, or other actions brought by employees, consumers, competitors, or suppliers. The Company establishes accruals for its potential exposure, as appropriate, for claims against the Company when losses become probable and reasonably estimable. However, future developments or settlements are uncertain and may require the Company to change such accruals as proceedings progress. Resolution of any currently known matters, either individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
The Companys operations are subject to the general risks of the food industry.
The food products manufacturing industry is subject to the risks posed by:
▪ food spoilage;
▪ food contamination caused by disease-producing organisms or pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella, and pathogenic E coli.;
▪ food allergens;
▪ nutritional and health-related concerns;
▪ federal, state, and local food processing controls;
▪ consumer product liability claims;
▪ product tampering; and
▪ the possible unavailability and/or expense of liability insurance.
The pathogens which may cause food contamination are found generally in livestock and in the environment and thus may be present in our products as a result of food processing. These pathogens also can be introduced to our products as a result of improper handling by customers or consumers. We do not have control over handling procedures once our products have been shipped for distribution. If one or more of these risks were to materialize, the Companys brand and business reputation could be negatively impacted. In addition, revenues could decrease, costs of doing business could increase, and the Companys operating results could be adversely affected.
Deterioration of economic conditions could harm the Companys business.
The Companys business may be adversely affected by changes in national or global economic conditions, including inflation, interest rates, availability of capital markets, energy availability and costs (including fuel surcharges), and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions. Decreases in consumer spending rates and shifts in consumer product preferences could also negatively impact the Company.
The recent volatility in financial markets and the deterioration of national and global economic conditions could impact the Companys operations as follows:
▪ The financial stability of our customers and suppliers may be compromised, which could result in additional bad debts for the Company or non-performance by suppliers; and
▪ The value of our investments in debt and equity securities may decline, including most significantly the Companys trading securities held in an investment portfolio and as part of a rabbi trust to fund supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans, and the Companys assets held in pension plans.
The Company also utilizes hedging programs to reduce its exposure to various commodity market risks, which qualify for hedge accounting for financial reporting purposes. Volatile fluctuations in market conditions could cause these instruments to become ineffective, which could require any gains or losses associated with these
instruments to be reported in the Companys earnings each period. These instruments may also limit the Companys ability to benefit from market gains if commodity prices become more favorable than those that have been secured under the Companys hedging programs.
Additionally, if a high pathogenic disease outbreak developed in the United States, it may negatively impact the national economy, demand for Company products, and/or the Companys workforce availability, and the Companys financial results could suffer. The Company has developed contingency plans to address infectious disease scenarios and the potential impact on its operations, and will continue to update these plans as necessary. There can be no assurance given, however, that these plans will be effective in eliminating the negative effects of any such diseases on the Companys operating results.
Fluctuations in commodity prices of pork, poultry, and feed ingredients could harm the Companys earnings.
The Companys results of operations and financial condition are largely dependent upon the cost and supply of pork, poultry, and feed grains as well as the selling prices for many of our products, which are determined by constantly changing market forces of supply and demand.
The live hog industry has evolved to very large, vertically integrated, year-round operations operating under long-term supply agreements. This has resulted in fewer hogs being available on the cash spot market. Additionally, overall hog production in the U.S. has declined. The decrease in the supply of hogs could diminish the utilization of harvest and production facilities and increase the cost of the raw materials they produce. Consequently, the Company uses long-term supply contracts to ensure a stable supply of raw materials while minimizing extreme fluctuations in costs over the long term. This may result, in the short term, in costs for live hogs that are higher than the cash spot market depending on the relationship of the cash spot market to contract prices. Market-based pricing on certain product lines, and lead time required to implement pricing adjustments, may prevent all or part of these cost increases from being recovered, and these higher costs could adversely affect our short-term financial results.
Jennie-O Turkey Store raises turkeys and also contracts with turkey growers to meet its raw material requirements for whole birds and processed turkey products. Additionally, the Company owns various hog raising facilities that supplement its supply of raw materials. Results in these operations are affected by the cost and supply of feed grains, which fluctuate due to climate conditions, production forecasts, and supply and demand conditions at local, regional, national, and worldwide levels. The Company attempts to manage some of its short-term exposure to fluctuations in feed prices by forward buying, using futures contracts, and pursuing pricing advances. However, these strategies may not be adequate to overcome sustained increases in market prices due to alternate uses for feed grains or other changes in these market conditions.
Outbreaks of disease among livestock and poultry flocks could harm the Companys revenues and operating margins.
The Company is subject to risks associated with the outbreak of disease in pork and beef livestock, and poultry flocks, including Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), pneumo-virus, Porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV2), Porcine Reproduction & Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD), and Avian Influenza. The outbreak of disease could adversely affect the Companys supply of raw materials, increase the cost of production, and reduce operating margins. Additionally, the outbreak of disease may hinder the Companys ability to market and sell products both domestically and internationally. The Company has developed business continuity plans for various disease scenarios and will continue to update these plans as necessary. There can be no assurance given, however, that these plans will be effective in eliminating the negative effects of any such diseases on the Companys operating results.
Market demand for the Companys products may fluctuate due to competition from other producers.
The Company faces competition from producers of various meats and protein sources, including pork, beef, turkey, chicken, and fish. The bases on which the Company competes include:
▪ price;
▪ product quality;
▪ brand identification;
▪ breadth of product line; and
▪ customer service.
Demand for the Companys products is also affected by competitors promotional spending and the effectiveness of the Companys advertising and marketing programs. The Company may be unable to compete successfully on any or all of these bases in the future.
The Companys operations are subject to the general risks associated with acquisitions.
The Company has made several acquisitions in recent years and regularly reviews opportunities for strategic growth through acquisitions. Potential risks associated with acquisitions include the inability to integrate new operations successfully, the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns, the potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired companies, the possible assumption of unknown liabilities, potential disputes with the sellers, potential impairment charges if purchase assumptions are not achieved or market conditions decline, and the inherent risks in entering markets or lines of business in which the Company has limited or no prior experience. Any or all of these risks could impact the Companys financial results and business reputation. In addition, acquisitions outside the United States may present unique challenges and increase the Companys exposure to the risks associated with foreign operations.
The Companys operations are subject to the general risks of litigation.
The Company is involved on an ongoing basis in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Trends in litigation may include class actions involving employees, consumers, competitors, suppliers, shareholders, or injured persons, and claims relating to product liability, contract disputes, intellectual property, advertising, and labeling, wage and hour laws, employment practices, or environmental matters. Litigation trends and the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and adverse litigation trends and outcomes could adversely affect the Companys financial results.
Government regulation, present and future, exposes the Company to potential sanctions and compliance costs that could adversely affect the Companys business.
The Companys operations are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, federal and state taxing authorities, and other state and local authorities that oversee workforce immigration laws, tax regulations, animal welfare, food safety standards, and the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, and labeling of the Companys products. The Companys manufacturing facilities and products are subject to constant inspection by federal, state, and local authorities. Claims or enforcement proceedings could be brought against the Company in the future. Additionally, the Company is subject to new or modified laws, regulations, and accounting standards. The Companys failure or inability to comply with such requirements could subject the Company to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions.
The Company is subject to stringent environmental regulation and potentially subject to environmental litigation, proceedings, and investigations.
The Companys past and present business operations and ownership and operation of real property are subject to stringent federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the environment, and the handling and disposition of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) or otherwise relating to protection of the environment. Compliance with these laws and regulations, and the ability to comply with any modifications to these laws and regulations, is material to the Companys business. New matters or sites may be identified in the future that will require additional investigation, assessment, or expenditures. In addition, some of the Companys facilities have been in operation for many years and, over time, the Company and other prior operators of these facilities may have generated and disposed of wastes that now may be considered hazardous. Future discovery of contamination of property underlying or in the vicinity of the Companys present or former properties or manufacturing facilities and/or waste disposal sites could require the Company to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any of these events, the implementation of new laws and regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws or regulations, could adversely affect the Companys financial results.
The Companys foreign operations pose additional risks to the Companys business.
The Company operates its business and markets its products internationally. The Companys foreign operations are subject to the risks described above, as well as risks related to fluctuations in currency values, foreign currency exchange controls, compliance with foreign laws, and other economic or political uncertainties. International sales are subject to risks related to general economic conditions, imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other restrictions, enforcement of remedies in foreign jurisdictions and compliance with applicable foreign laws, and other economic and political uncertainties. All of these risks could result in increased costs or decreased revenues, which could adversely affect the Companys financial results.
Deterioration of labor relations or increases in labor costs could harm the Companys business.
The Company has approximately 19,600 domestic and foreign employees, of which approximately 5,700 are represented by labor unions, principally the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. A significant increase in labor costs or a deterioration of labor relations at any of the Companys facilities that results in work slowdowns or stoppages could harm the Companys financial results. The union contract at the Companys facility in Stockton, California will expire during fiscal 2012, covering approximately 100 employees. Negotiations at this facility have not yet been initiated. The company is currently negotiating a new contract at its Clougherty Packing (Farmer John) foodservice facility, covering approximately 115 people.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities in the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2012
Period |
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
| |
January 30, 2012 March 4, 2012 |
|
250,164 |
|
$ |
29.04 |
|
250,000 |
|
2,701,900 |
|
March 5, 2012 April 1, 2012 |
|
416,000 |
|
28.67 |
|
416,000 |
|
2,285,900 |
| |
April 2, 2011 April 29, 2012 |
|
411,500 |
|
28.63 |
|
411,500 |
|
1,874,400 |
| |
Total |
|
1,077,664 |
|
$ |
28.74 |
|
1,077,500 |
|
|
|
1The 164 shares repurchased during the second quarter, other than through publicly announced plans or programs, represent purchases for a Company employee award program.
2On May 26, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock with no expiration date. On November 22, 2010, the Board of Directors also authorized a two-for-one split of the Companys common stock. As part of the resolution to approve that stock split, the number of shares remaining to be repurchased was adjusted proportionately. The stock split was approved by shareholders and was subsequently effected on February 1, 2011. All numbers in the table above reflect the impact of this stock split.
10.1 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification Required Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification Required Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 8, 2012 |
By |
/s/ JODY H. FERAGEN |
|
|
JODY H. FERAGEN |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|
|
and Director |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: June 8, 2012 |
By |
/s/ JAMES N. SHEEHAN |
|
|
JAMES N. SHEEHAN |
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |