Blueprint
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☑ QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2018
OR
☐
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from ___ to ___
Commission File Number 1-14523
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
California
|
|
95-2086631
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
16139 Wyandotte Street
|
|
|
Van Nuys, California
|
|
91406
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area
Code: 818-787-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting
company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
|
Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐ No ☒
As of February 1, 2019, there were 3,673,055 shares of the
issuer’s Common Stock, no par value,
outstanding.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION, OTHER
INFORMATION AND SIGNATURE
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the
“Company”) business and activities set forth in this
Form 10-Q and in other past and future reports and announcements by
the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and assumptions regarding future activities and results of
operations of the Company. In light of the “safe
harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could
cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in
any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company:
market acceptance of Company products and services; changing
business conditions or technologies and volatility in the
semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the
Company’s products and services; the impact of competition;
problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery
schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications
which could affect the market for the Company’s products and
services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired
businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with
conducting business internationally and especially in Asia,
including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency
restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social,
political and economic instability; changes in U.S. and global
financial and equity markets, including market disruptions and
significant interest rate fluctuations; and other economic,
financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s
control. Other than statements of historical fact, all statements
made in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking, including, but
not limited to, statements regarding industry prospects, future
results of operations or financial position, and statements of our
intent, belief and current expectations about our strategic
direction, prospective and future financial results and condition.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the
use of terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,”
“potential,” “believes,” “can
impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or
other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to
predict, which could cause actual outcomes and results to differ
materially from our expectations, forecasts and
assumptions.
Unless
otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed
circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events. You are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$6,192
|
$6,539
|
Short-term
deposits
|
2,121
|
653
|
Trade
accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $249
and $259
|
6,996
|
7,747
|
Other
receivables
|
991
|
881
|
Inventories,
less provision for obsolete inventory of $695 and $695
|
2,630
|
2,930
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
279
|
208
|
Assets
held for sale
|
486
|
91
|
Total current assets
|
19,695
|
19,049
|
NON-CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
335
|
400
|
Investment
properties, net
|
678
|
1,146
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
12,749
|
11,935
|
Other
assets
|
1,750
|
2,249
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,688
|
1,695
|
Total
non-current assets
|
17,200
|
17,425
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$36,895
|
$36,474
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Lines
of credit
|
$2,033
|
$2,043
|
Accounts
payable
|
2,532
|
3,704
|
Accrued
expenses
|
3,978
|
3,172
|
Income
taxes payable
|
256
|
285
|
Current
portion of bank loans payable
|
480
|
367
|
Current
portion of capital leases
|
252
|
250
|
Total current liabilities
|
9,531
|
9,821
|
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Bank
loans payable, net of current portion
|
2,525
|
1,437
|
Capital leases,
net of current portion
|
382
|
524
|
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
296
|
327
|
Income
taxes payable
|
613
|
828
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
37
|
36
|
Total
non-current liabilities
|
3,853
|
3,152
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
$13,384
|
$12,973
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
TRIO-TECH
INTERNATIONAL’S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
Common
stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,673,055 shares
issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2018, and 3,553,055
shares as at June 30, 2018
|
$11,424
|
$11,023
|
Paid-in
capital
|
3,258
|
3,249
|
Accumulated
retained earnings
|
5,938
|
5,525
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain-translation adjustments
|
1,683
|
2,182
|
Total Trio-Tech International shareholders'
equity
|
22,303
|
21,979
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
1,208
|
1,522
|
TOTAL
EQUITY
|
$23,511
|
$23,501
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$36,895
|
$36,474
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
UNAUDITED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
$3,352
|
$3,973
|
$6,989
|
$8,738
|
Testing
services
|
4,393
|
4,936
|
8,830
|
9,541
|
Distribution
|
1,916
|
1,606
|
3,860
|
3,142
|
Others
|
29
|
37
|
56
|
76
|
|
9,690
|
10,552
|
19,735
|
21,497
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of manufactured products sold
|
2,646
|
3,068
|
5,503
|
6,717
|
Cost
of testing services rendered
|
3,106
|
3,251
|
6,489
|
6,390
|
Cost
of distribution
|
1,662
|
1,409
|
3,348
|
2,777
|
Others
|
18
|
29
|
36
|
58
|
|
7,432
|
7,757
|
15,376
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
2,258
|
2,795
|
4,359
|
5,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
1,722
|
1,727
|
3,481
|
3,566
|
Selling
|
187
|
252
|
334
|
431
|
Research
and development
|
122
|
118
|
194
|
302
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
Total
operating expenses
|
2,031
|
2,097
|
4,009
|
4,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
227
|
698
|
350
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income / (Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expenses
|
(98)
|
(52)
|
(176)
|
(110)
|
Other income,
net
|
49
|
42
|
92
|
200
|
Total
other (expenses) / income
|
(49)
|
(10)
|
(84)
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Income
Taxes
|
178
|
688
|
266
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Benefits / (Expenses)
|
124
|
(13)
|
50
|
(55)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, net of
tax
|
302
|
675
|
316
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
Income
/ (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
4
|
(2)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
NET INCOME
|
306
|
673
|
312
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
net (loss) / income attributable to non-controlling
interest
|
(42)
|
-
|
(101)
|
27
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$348
|
$673
|
$413
|
$1,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations, net of tax
|
346
|
678
|
415
|
1,254
|
Income
/ (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
2
|
(5)
|
(2)
|
(6)
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$348
|
$673
|
$413
|
$1,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.09
|
$0.19
|
$0.11
|
$0.35
|
Basic
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Basic Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.09
|
$0.19
|
$0.11
|
$0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
0.09
|
$0.18
|
$0.11
|
$0.34
|
Diluted
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Diluted Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.09
|
$0.18
|
$0.11
|
$0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
3,673
|
3,548
|
3,673
|
3,548
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
108
|
245
|
142
|
222
|
Number
of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted
|
3,781
|
3,793
|
3,815
|
3,770
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
UNAUDITED (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Trio-Tech
International Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$306
|
$673
|
$312
|
$1,275
|
Foreign
currency translation, net of tax
|
(51)
|
588
|
(590)
|
963
|
Comprehensive Income / (Loss)
|
255
|
1,261
|
(278)
|
2,238
|
Less:
comprehensive (loss) / income attributable to non-controlling
interest
|
(57)
|
88
|
(192)
|
115
|
Comprehensive Income / (Loss) Attributable to Trio-Tech
International Common Shareholders
|
$312
|
$1,173
|
$(86)
|
$2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
Six Months ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Balance
at June 30, 2018
|
3,553
|
11,023
|
3,249
|
5,525
|
2,182
|
1,522
|
23,501
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
413
|
-
|
(101)
|
312
|
Dividend
declared by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(122)
|
(122)
|
Exercise of stock
options
|
120
|
401
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
401
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(499)
|
(91)
|
(590)
|
Balance
at Dec. 31, 2018
|
3,673
|
11,424
|
3,258
|
5,938
|
1,683
|
1,208
|
23,511
|
Six Months ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
Balance
at June 30, 2017
|
3,523
|
10,921
|
3,206
|
4,341
|
1,633
|
1,426
|
21,527
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,248
|
-
|
27
|
1,275
|
Dividend
declared by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(123)
|
(123)
|
Exercise of
options
|
15
|
41
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
41
|
Issue of restricted
shares to service provider
|
10
|
51
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
875
|
88
|
963
|
Balance
at Dec. 31, 2017
|
3,548
|
11,013
|
3,208
|
5,589
|
2,508
|
1,418
|
23,736
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$312
|
$1,275
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,145
|
1,019
|
Stock
compensation
|
9
|
2
|
Reversal
of provision for obsolete inventory
|
-
|
(3)
|
Reversal of income tax provision
|
(145)
|
-
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
(2)
|
-
|
Accrued
interest expense, net accrued interest income
|
26
|
95
|
Write
off of property, plant and equipment – continued
operations
|
-
|
11
|
Issuance
of shares to service provider
|
-
|
51
|
Warranty
recovery, net
|
(22)
|
3
|
Gain
on proceeds from insurance claim
|
-
|
(73)
|
Deferred
tax benefit / (provision)
|
29
|
(25)
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition
effects
|
|
|
Trade
accounts receivable
|
753
|
(484)
|
Other receivables
|
(110)
|
(147)
|
Other assets
|
428
|
(37)
|
Inventories
|
294
|
(1,153)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(71)
|
(54)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(287)
|
934
|
Income taxes payable
|
(84)
|
59
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
2,275
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturing of unrestricted term deposits and short-term
deposits, net
|
-
|
544
|
Proceeds
from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
3
|
-
|
Investments
in unrestricted deposits
|
(1,461)
|
(281)
|
Insurance
proceeds received
|
-
|
73
|
Addition
to property, plant and equipment
|
(2,297)
|
(1,507)
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(3,755)
|
(1,171)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
|
|
|
Repayment
on lines of credit
|
(5,908)
|
(4,978)
|
Repayment
of bank loans and capital leases
|
(410)
|
(373)
|
Dividends
paid on non-controlling interest
|
(122)
|
(123)
|
Proceeds
from exercising stock options
|
401
|
41
|
Proceeds
from lines of credit
|
5,962
|
4,581
|
Proceeds
from bank loans and capital leases
|
1,475
|
464
|
Net Cash Generated from / (Used in) Financing
Activities
|
1,398
|
(388)
|
|
|
|
Effect of Changes in Exchange Rate
|
(272)
|
433
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) / increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash
|
(354)
|
347
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of
period
|
8,234
|
6,429
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of
period
|
$7,880
|
$6,776
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Information of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$150
|
$91
|
Income
taxes
|
$104
|
$119
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions
|
|
|
Capital
lease of property, plant and equipment
|
$-
|
$228
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Reconciliation of Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
6,192
|
5,059
|
Restricted term-deposits in non-current assets
|
1,688
|
1,717
|
Total Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in
statement of cash flows
|
$7,880
|
$6,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
Amounts
reflecting adoption of ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows,
Restricted Cash (Topic 230) beginning in the first quarter of
2019.
Amounts included in restricted deposits represent the amount of
cash pledged to secure loans payable or trade financing granted by
financial institutions and serve as collateral for public utility
agreements such as electricity and water. Restricted deposits are
classified as non-current assets, as they relate to long-term
obligations and will become unrestricted only upon discharge of the
obligations.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE AND NUMBER OF
SHARES)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Trio-Tech International (“the Company” or
“TTI” hereafter) was incorporated in fiscal year 1958
under the laws of the State of California. TTI provides third-party
semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its
laboratories in Southeast Asia. In addition, TTI operates testing
facilities in the United States. The Company also designs,
develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of equipment and
systems used in the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor
devices and electronic components. In the second quarter of fiscal
year 2019, TTI conducted business in four business segments:
Manufacturing, Testing Services, Distribution and Real Estate. TTI
has subsidiaries in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and
China as follows:
|
Ownership
|
Location
|
Express Test Corporation (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van
Nuys, California
|
Trio-Tech Reliability Services (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van
Nuys, California
|
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van
Nuys, California
|
European Electronic Test Centre (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Dublin,
Ireland
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Bangkok,
Thailand
|
Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Bangkok,
Thailand
|
(49% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and 51% owned by
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Penang
and Selangor, Malaysia
|
Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd.
|
55%
|
Selangor,
Malaysia
|
(100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.)
|
|
|
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.
|
76%
|
Selangor,
Malaysia
|
(76% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Suzhou,
China
|
Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Chongqing,
China
|
SHI International Pte. Ltd. (Dormant)
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd)
|
55%
|
Singapore
|
PT SHI Indonesia (Dormant)
(100% owned by SHI International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Batam,
Indonesia
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Tianjin,
China
|
* 100% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
The accompanying un-audited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S.
dollars. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include all the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.
Except as otherwise specifically noted in this form 10-Q, the
Company’s operating results are presented based on the
translation of foreign currencies using the respective
quarter’s average exchange rate.
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform
to the current presentation.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
amendments in ASU 2018-19 ASC Topic 326: Codification Improvements
to Financial Instruments – Credit Losses clarifies that
receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope
of the credit losses standard, but rather, should be accounted for
in accordance with the leases standard. The amendments are
effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
While early application is permitted, including adoption in an
interim period, the Company has not elected to early adopt. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting
standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-18 ASC Topic 808: Collaborative
Arrangements: Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and
Topic 606, provides more comparability in the presentation of
revenue for certain transactions between collaborative arrangement
participants. It allows organizations to only present units of
account in collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of
the revenue recognition standard together with revenue accounted
for under the revenue recognition standard. The parts of the
collaborative arrangement that are not in the scope of the revenue
recognition standard should be presented separately from revenue
accounted for under the revenue recognition standard. The
amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this
accounting standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-13 ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure
Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair
Value Measurement modify the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurements based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement,
including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments
on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted
average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3
fair value measurements, and the narrative description of
measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only
the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial
fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied
retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date.
The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-09 Codification
Improvements represent changes
to clarify, correct errors in, or make minor improvements to the
Codification, eliminating inconsistencies and providing
clarifications in current guidance. The amendments in this ASU
include those made to: Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive
Income-Overall; Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments;
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity-Overall; Compensation-Stock
Compensation-Income Taxes; Business Combinations-Income Taxes;
Derivatives and Hedging-Overall; Fair Value Measurement-Overall;
Financial Services-Brokers and Dealers-Liabilities; and Plan
Accounting-Defined Contribution Pension Plans-Investments-Other.
The amendments are effective for all entities for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018. The effectiveness of this update
is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-02 ASC Topic 220: Income Statement – Reporting
Comprehensive Income provide financial statement preparers
with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to retained earnings in each
period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal
corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion
thereof) is recorded. The amendments
in ASC Topic 220 are effective for public business entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. While early application is
permitted, including adoption in an interim period, the
Company has not elected to early adopt. The effectiveness of this
update is not expected to have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2017-11: Earnings Per Share
(Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (Topic
480);
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815) are effective for public companies for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2017-04 ASC Topic 350 —
'Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other (“ASC Topic
350”) simplify the test for goodwill impairment. For public
companies, these amendments are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2016-13 ASC Topic 326: Financial Instruments —
Credit losses (“ASC Topic
326”) are issued for the measurement of all expected credit
losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on
historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forecasts. For public companies that are not SEC
filers, ASC Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
While early application will be permitted for all organizations for
fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018, the Company has not yet
determined if it will early adopt. The effectiveness of this update
is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU 2016-12 ASC Topic 842:
Leases, which amends a number of aspects of the existing accounting
standards for leases which requiring lessees to recognize operating
leased assets and corresponding liabilities on the balance sheet
for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. In
July 2018, ASU 2018-10: Codification Improvements to Leases are
to address stakeholders’ questions about how to apply certain
aspects of the new guidance in Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 842, Leases. The
clarifications address the rate implicit in the lease, impairment
of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease
classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase
options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and
certain transition adjustments. Besides, the amendments in ASU
2018-11 ASC Topic 842: Leases:
Targeted Improvements related to transition relief on
comparative reporting at adoption affect all entities with lease
contracts that choose the additional transition method and
separating components of a contract affect only lessors whose lease
contracts qualify for the practical expedient. In July 2018, the
amendments in ASU 2018-20 ASC Topic 842: Leases: Narrow-Scope
Improvements for Lessors addresses the following issues facing
lessors when applying this lease standard: (1) sales taxes and
other similar taxes collected from lessees, (2) certain lessor
costs and (3) recognition of variable payments for contracts with
lease and non-lease components. The
amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted and allows for
either a modified retrospective adoption or a retrospective
adoption by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, the
Company has not elected to early adopt. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this ASU might
result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company
is still evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update
on its consolidated financial statements.
Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective until after
December 31, 2018 are not expected to have a significant effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
3. TERM DEPOSITS
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
deposits
|
$2,132
|
$606
|
Currency
translation effect on short-term deposits
|
(11)
|
47
|
Total short-term deposits
|
2,121
|
653
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,699
|
1,664
|
Currency
translation effect on restricted term deposits
|
(11)
|
31
|
Total restricted term deposits
|
1,688
|
1,695
|
Total term deposits
|
$3,809
|
$2,348
|
Restricted deposits represent the amount of cash pledged to secure
loans payable granted by financial institutions and serve as
collateral for public utility agreements such as electricity and
water. Restricted deposits are classified as non-current assets, as
they relate to long-term obligations and will become unrestricted
only upon discharge of the obligations. Short-term deposits
represent bank deposits, which do not qualify as cash
equivalents.
4. TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR
DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable consists of customer obligations due under
normal trade terms. Although management generally does not require
collateral, letters of credit may be required from the customers in
certain circumstances. Management periodically performs credit
evaluations of customers’ financial conditions.
Senior management reviews accounts receivable on a periodic basis
to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible.
Management includes any accounts receivable balances that are
determined to be uncollectible in the allowance for doubtful
accounts. After all reasonable attempts to collect a receivable
have failed, the receivable is written off against the
allowance. Based on the information available,
management believed the allowance for doubtful accounts as of
December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 was
adequate.
The following table represents the changes in the allowance for
doubtful accounts:
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Beginning
|
$259
|
$247
|
Additions charged
to expenses
|
-
|
8
|
Recovered
|
(2)
|
(1)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(8)
|
5
|
Ending
|
$249
|
$259
|
5. LOANS RECEIVABLE FROM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS
The following table presents Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd
(“TTCQ”)’s loan receivable from property
development projects in China as of December 31, 2018. The exchange
rate is based on the date published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2015, since the net loan
receivable was “nil” as of December 31,
2018.
|
Loan Expiry
Date
|
|
Loan Amount
(RMB)
|
|
|
Loan Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
|
Short-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JiangHuai (Project – Yu Jin Jiang An)
|
May 31, 2013
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
Less: allowance for doubtful receivables
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
Net loan receivables from property development
projects
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye
|
Oct 31, 2016
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
Less: transfer – down-payment for purchase of
investment property
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
Net loan receivables from property development
projects
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiangHuai Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”)
to invest in their property development projects (Project - Yu Jin
Jiang An) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term
nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based
on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables, amounting to renminbi (“RMB”) 2,000,
or approximately $325. The loan was renewed but expired on May 31,
2013. TTCQ is in the legal process of recovering the outstanding
amount of $325. TTCQ did not generate other income from JiangHuai
for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 or for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2018. Based on TTI’s financial policy, a
provision for doubtful receivables of $325 on the investment in
JiangHuai was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2014
based on TTI’s financial policy. TTCQ is in the legal process
of recovering the outstanding amount of $325.
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiaSheng”) to
invest in their property development projects (Project B-48 Phase
2) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term nature
of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based on ASC
Topic 310, amounting to RMB 5,000, or approximately $814 based on
the exchange rate as at March 31, 2015 published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore. The amount was unsecured and repayable at
the end of the term. The loan was renewed in November 2011 for a
period of one year, which expired on October 31, 2012 and was again
renewed in November 2012 and expired in November 2013. On November
1, 2013 the loan was transferred by JiaSheng to, and is now payable
by, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (“Jun Zhou Zhi
Ye”), and the transferred agreement expired on October 31,
2016. Prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan
receivable was classified as a long-term receivable. The book value
of the loan receivable approximates its fair value. In the second
quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan receivable was transferred to
down payment for purchase of investment property that is being
developed in the Singapore Themed Resort Project (see Note
8).
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
$1,156
|
$1,153
|
Work
in progress
|
1,612
|
1,947
|
Finished
goods
|
565
|
505
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(8)
|
20
|
Less:
provision for obsolete inventory
|
(695)
|
(695)
|
|
$2,630
|
$2,930
|
The following table represents
the changes in provision for obsolete inventory:
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
$695
|
$686
|
Additions
charged to expenses
|
3
|
9
|
Usage
– disposition
|
(2)
|
(5)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(1)
|
5
|
Ending
|
$695
|
$695
|
7. ASSETS HELD FOR
SALE
Penang Property
During
the fourth quarter of 2015, the operations in Malaysia planned to
sell its factory building in Penang, Malaysia. In accordance with
ASC Topic 360, during fiscal year 2015 the property was
reclassified from investment property, which had a net book value
of RM 371, or approximately $98, to assets held for sale, since
there was an intention to sell the factory building. In May 2015,
Trio-Tech Malaysia was approached by a potential buyer to purchase
the factory building. On September 14, 2015, application to sell
the property was rejected by Penang Development Corporation (PDC).
The rejection was because the business activity of the purchaser
was not suitable to the industry that is being promoted on said
property. PDC made an offer to purchase the property, which was not
at the expected value and the offer expired on March 28, 2016 and
no further conversations with PDC have occurred since. During the
first quarter of fiscal year 2019, there was an interested buyer to
purchase the property; however, the purchase was not consummated as
the potential buyer was unable to obtain financing. During the
second quarter of fiscal year 2019, Management has received an
expressions of interest in acquiring this property and continues to
pursue such offer and other potential opportunities for the sale of
this property. The net book values of the building were RM371, or
$89, as at each of December 31, 2018 and RM371, or $91, as at June
30, 2018.
Mao Ye Property
During
the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell our Mao Ye
Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties. In
order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2019, the Company completed the sale of seven of the fifteen
units constituting the Mao Ye Property. The Company believes that
it has the ability to complete the sale transaction for remaining
units within a period of one year since the asset can be
transferred to the buyer in its present condition and the target
price given to the sole agent is reasonable in relation to its
current fair value. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, as there was
an intention to sell the investment properties within 1 year, the
property was reclassified from investment property, which had a net
book value of RMB 2,732, or approximately $397 as at December 31,
2018.
8. INVESTMENTS
During
the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company entered into a
joint venture agreement with JiaSheng to develop real estate
projects in China. The Company invested RMB 10,000, or
approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as of March 31,
2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for a 10%
interest in the newly formed joint venture, which was incorporated
as a limited liability company, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd.
(the “joint venture”), in China. The agreement
stipulated that the Company would nominate two of the five members
of the Board of Directors of the joint venture and had the ability
to assign two members of management to the joint venture. The
agreement also stipulated that the Company would receive a fee of
RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as
of March 31, 2014, published by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore, for the services rendered in connection with bidding in
certain real estate projects from the local government. Upon
signing of the agreement, JiaSheng paid the Company RMB 5,000 in
cash, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate published by
the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2014. The
remaining RMB 5,000, which was not recorded as a receivable as the
Company considered the collectability uncertain, would be paid over
72 months commencing in 36 months from the date of the agreement
when the joint venture secured a property development project
stated inside the joint venture agreement. The Company considered
the RMB 5,000, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate as
of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore,
received in cash from JiaSheng, the controlling venturer in the
joint venture, as a partial return of the Company’s initial
investment of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the
exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore. Therefore, the RMB 5,000 received in cash
was offset against the initial investment of RMB 10,000, resulting
in a net investment of RMB 5,000 as of March 31, 2014. The Company
further reduced its investments by RMB 137, or approximately $22,
towards the losses from operations incurred by the joint venture,
resulting in a net investment of RMB 4,863, or approximately $781
based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore as of March 31, 2014.
“Investments”
in the real estate segment were the cost of an investment in a
joint venture in which we had a 10% interest. During the second
quarter of fiscal year 2014, TTCQ disposed of its 10% interest in
the joint venture. The joint venture had to raise funds for the
development of the project. As a joint-venture partner, TTCQ was
required to stand guarantee for the funds to be borrowed;
considering the amount of borrowing, the risk involved was higher
than the investment made, hence TTCQ decided to dispose of the 10%
interest in the joint venture investment. On October 2, 2013, TTCQ
entered into a share transfer agreement (the “Share Transfer
Agreement”) with Zhu Shu. Based on the agreement, the
purchase price was to be paid by (1) RMB 10,000 worth of commercial
property in Chongqing China, or approximately $1,634 based on
exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as
of October 2, 2013, by non-monetary consideration and (2) the
remaining RMB 8,000, or approximately $1,307 based on exchange
rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of
October 2, 2013, by cash consideration. The consideration consisted
of (1) commercial units measuring 668 square meters to be delivered
in June 2016 and (2) sixteen quarterly equal installments of RMB
500 per quarter commencing from January 2014. Based on ASC Topic
845 Non-monetary Consideration, the Company deferred the
recognition of the gain on disposal of the 10% interest in joint
venture investment until such time that the consideration is paid,
so that the gain can be ascertained. The recorded value of the
disposed investment amounting to $783, based on exchange rates
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of June 30,
2014, is classified as “other assets” under non-current
assets, because it is considered a down payment for the purchase of
the commercial property in Chongqing. The first three installments,
amounting to RMB 500 each due in January 2014, April 2014 and July
2014, were all outstanding until the date of disposal of the
investment in the joint venture. Out of the outstanding RMB 8,000,
TTCQ received RMB 100 during May 2014.
On
October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a
memorandum of understanding. Based on the memorandum of
understanding, both parties agreed to register a sales and purchase
agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the
commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project) located
in Chongqing, China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop
lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration
for the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye as
follows:
a) Long
term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed
in Note 5, plus the interest receivable on long term loan
receivable of RMB 1,250;
b)
Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as mentioned above;
and
c) RMB
5,900 for the part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB
8,000 relating to the disposal of the joint venture.
The
consideration does not include the remaining outstanding amount of
RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid to TTCQ in
cash.
The
shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the
construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort
Project. The initial targeted date of completion was December 31,
2016. Based on discussions with the developers, the completion date
is currently estimated to be December 31, 2019.
The
Share Transfer Agreement (10% interest in the joint venture) was
registered with the relevant authorities in China during October
2016.
9. INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of December 31, 2018. The exchange rate is
based on the market rate as of December 31, 2018.
|
Investment Date /
Reclassification Date
|
|
Investment
Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I - MaoYe Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
|
|
-
|
(87)
|
Reclassification
as “Asset held for sale”
|
July
01, 2018
|
(5,554)
|
(807)
|
|
-
|
-
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(119)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
7,625
|
1,109
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
Sep
30, 2018
|
(5,783)
|
(841)
|
Reclassified
as “Asset held for sale”
|
July
01, 2018
|
2,822
|
410
|
|
(2,961)
|
(431)
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
4,664
|
678
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of June 30, 2018. The exchange rate is based
on the market rate as of June 30, 2018.
|
|
|
Investment
Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I - Mao Ye
Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(131)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
13,179
|
1,991
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2018
|
(5,596)
|
(845)
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
7,583
|
1,146
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment
properties in Malaysia as of December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018.
The exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of June 30, 2015
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
of Penang Property
|
Dec
31, 2012
|
681
|
181
|
Currency translation
|
|
-
|
(16)
|
Reclassification as "Asset held for
sale"
|
|
(681)
|
(165)
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(83)
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
7
|
Reclassified
as “Assets held for sale”
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(76)
|
Net
investment in rental property - Malaysia
|
|
-
|
-
|
Rental Property I - Mao Ye Property
In fiscal 2008, TTCQ purchased an office in Chongqing, China from
MaoYe Property Ltd. (“MaoYe”), for a total cash
purchase price of RMB 5,554, or approximately $894. TTCQ identified
a new tenant and signed a new rental agreement (653 square meters
at a monthly rent of RMB 39, or approximately $6) on August 1, 2015
which expires on July 31, 2020. TTCQ signed a new rental agreement
(451 square meters at a monthly rent of RMB 24, or approximately
$4) on February 1, 2018 which expires on January 31,
2021.
During
the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell our Mao Ye
Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties. In
order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2019, the Company completed the sale of seven of the fifteen
units constituting the Mao Ye Property. The Company believes that
it has the ability to complete the sale transaction for remaining
units within a period of one year since the asset can be
transferred to the buyer in its present condition and the target
price given to the sole agent is reasonable in relation to its
current fair value. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, as there was
an intention to sell the investment properties within 1 year, the
property was reclassified from investment property, which had a net
book value of RMB 2,732, or approximately $397 as at December 31,
2018.
Property purchased from MaoYe generated a rental income of $21 and
$43 during the three and six months ended December 31, 2018,
respectively, and $26 and $53 for the same period in last fiscal
year.
Rental Property II - JiangHuai
In
fiscal year 2010, TTCQ purchased eight units of commercial property
in Chongqing, China from Chongqing JiangHuai Real Estate
Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”) for a total purchase
price of RMB 3,600, or approximately $580. Although these units
were rented in the past, all eight units are currently vacant and
TTCQ is working with the developer to find a suitable buyer to
purchase all the commercial units. TTCQ has yet to receive the
title deed for these properties; however, TTCQ has the vacancies in
possession with the exception of two units, which are in the
process of clarification. TTCQ is in the legal process to obtain
the title deed, which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the
entire project.
Property purchased from JiangHuai did not generate any rental
income during the three and six months ended December 31, 2018 or
during the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Rental Property III – FuLi
In fiscal 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
Chongqing FuLi Real Estate Development Co. Ltd.
(“FuLi”) to purchase two commercial properties totaling
311.99 square meters (“office space”) located in Jiang
Bei District Chongqing. Although TTCQ currently rents its office
premises from a third party, it intends to use the office space as
its office premises. The total purchase price committed and paid
was RMB 4,025, or approximately $648. The development was
completed, and the property was handed over in April 2013 and the
title deed was received during the third quarter of fiscal
2014.
The two
commercial properties were leased to third parties under two
separate rental agreements. One of such leases provides for a rent
increase of 5% every year on May 1, commencing in 2017 until the
rental agreement expires on April 30, 2019. For the other
lease expired on March 31, 2018, TTCQ identified a new tenant and
signed a new rental agreement (161 square meters at a monthly rent
of RMB 62, or approximately $9) on November 1, 2018 which expires
on October 31, 2019.
Properties purchased from Fu Li generated a rental income of $8 and
$13 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018,
respectively, while it generated a rental income of $11 and $23 for
the same period in the last fiscal year.
Summary
Total rental income for all investment properties in China was $29
and $56 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018,
respectively, and were $37 and $76 for the same period in the last
fiscal year.
Depreciation expenses for all investment properties in China
were $14 and $28 and for the three and
six months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, and were $24 and
$49 for the same period in the last fiscal
year.
10. OTHER ASSETS
Other
assets consisted of the following:
|
Dec.
31, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Down
payment for purchase of investment properties
|
$1,645
|
$1,645
|
Down
payment for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
133
|
561
|
Deposits
for rental and utilities
|
140
|
140
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(168)
|
(97)
|
Total
|
$1,750
|
$2,249
|
11. LINES OF CREDIT
Carrying value of the Company’s lines of credit approximates
its fair value because the interest rates associated with the lines
of credit are adjustable in accordance with market situations when
the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and
adequate access to funds in global markets.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit
that are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity with
|
Type of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
|
|
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines
of Credit
|
Ranging
from 1.6% to
5.5%
|
$-
|
$4,172
|
$3,310
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines
of Credit
|
5.22%
to 6.3%
|
$-
|
$1,454
|
$404
|
Universal (Far
East) Pte. Ltd.
|
Lines
of Credit
|
Ranging
from 1.6% to
5.5%
|
$-
|
$366
|
$245
|
As of June 30, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit that
are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity with
|
Type of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
|
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines
of Credit
|
Ranging
from 1.6% to 5.5%
|
$-
|
$4,183
|
$3,325
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines
of Credit
|
5.22%
|
$-
|
$1,511
|
$437
|
Universal
(Far East) Pte. Ltd.
|
Lines
of Credit
|
Ranging
from 1.6% to 5.5%
|
$-
|
$367
|
$256
|
On
January 4, 2018, Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. signed an
agreement with a bank to sub-allocate a portion of the facility
thereunder to its subsidiary - Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for
an Accounts Payable Financing facility for S$500, or approximately
$367 based on the market exchange rate. Interest charged ranges
between 1.6% and 5.5%. The financing facility was set up to
facilitate the working capital in our operations in Singapore. The
Company started to use this facility in fiscal year
2018.
12. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following:
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Payroll
and related costs
|
$1,385
|
$1,545
|
Commissions
|
77
|
89
|
Customer
deposits
|
1,125
|
17
|
Legal
and audit
|
183
|
265
|
Sales
tax
|
18
|
17
|
Utilities
|
142
|
130
|
Warranty
|
60
|
82
|
Accrued
purchase of materials and property, plant and
equipment
|
354
|
454
|
Provision
for re-instatement
|
294
|
289
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
397
|
203
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(57)
|
81
|
Total
|
$3,978
|
$3,172
|
13. WARRANTY ACCRUAL
The Company provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred
under its warranty program at the time the sale is
recorded. The warranty period of the products
manufactured by the Company is generally one year or the warranty
period agreed with the customer. The Company estimates
the warranty costs based on the historical rates of warranty
returns. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its
recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as
necessary.
|
Dec.
31,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Beginning
|
$82
|
$48
|
Additions
charged to cost and expenses
|
4
|
64
|
Reversal
|
(26)
|
(30)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
-
|
-
|
Ending
|
$60
|
$82
|
14. BANK LOANS PAYABLE
Bank loans payable consisted of the following:
|
Dec.
31, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note
payable denominated in RM for expansion plans in Malaysia, maturing
in August 2028, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate
less 1.50% (5.00% at December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018) per
annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through
August 2028, collateralized by the acquired building with a
carrying value of $7,518 and $2,809, as at December 31, 2018 and
June 30, 2018, respectively.
|
2,861
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
Note
payable denominated in U.S. dollars for expansion plans in
Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in April 2020, bearing
interest at the bank’s lending rate (3.96% for December 31,
2018 and June 30, 2018) with monthly payments of principal plus
interest through June 2020. This note payable is secured by plant
and equipment with a carrying value of $228 and $187, as at
December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018, respectively.
|
218
|
293
|
|
|
|
Currency
translation effect on bank loan payable
|
(74)
|
(104)
|
|
|
|
Total bank loans payable
|
$3,005
|
$1,804
|
Current
portion of bank loan payable
|
489
|
380
|
Currency
translation effect on current portion of bank loan
|
(9)
|
(13)
|
Current portion of bank loan payable
|
480
|
367
|
Long
term portion of bank loan payable
|
2,590
|
1,528
|
Currency
translation effect on long-term portion of bank loan
|
(65)
|
(91)
|
Long term portion of bank loans payable
|
$2,525
|
$1,437
|
Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at December 31,
2018 were as follows:
2019
|
$480
|
2020
|
411
|
2021
|
364
|
2022
|
383
|
2023
|
300
|
Thereafter
|
1,067
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$3,005
|
Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at June 30, 2018
were as follows:
2019
|
$367
|
2020
|
372
|
2021
|
242
|
2022
|
254
|
2023
|
267
|
Thereafter
|
302
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$1,804
|
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. has capital commitments for the purchase of
equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RM
18, or approximately $4, based on the exchange rate as at December
31, 2018, as compared to the capital commitment as at June 30, 2018
amounting to RM 62, or approximately $16.
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. in China has capital commitments for
the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs
amounting to RMB 265, or approximately $39, based on the exchange
rate as on December 31, 2018, as compared to the capital commitment
as at June 30, 2018 amounting to RMB 3,927, or approximately
$593.
Trio-Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. in China has capital commitments for the
purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs
amounting to RMB 632, or approximately $92, based on the exchange
rate as on December 31, 2018 as compared to the capital commitment
as at June 30, 2018 amounting to RMB 6,084, or approximately
$919.
Deposits with banks in China are not insured by the local
government or agency, and are consequently exposed to risk of loss.
The Company believes the probability of a bank failure, causing
loss to the Company, is remote.
The Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims
and assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal
business operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of
these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
16. BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
In fiscal year 2019, the Company operates in four segments; the
testing service industry (which performs structural and electronic
tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of
equipment (which equipment tests the structural integrity of
integrated circuits and other products), distribution of various
products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia,
and the real estate segment in China.
The revenue allocated to individual countries was based on where
the customers were located. The allocation of the cost of
equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and
depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary
purpose for which the equipment was acquired.
All inter-segment revenue was from the manufacturing segment to the
testing and distribution segments. Total inter-segment revenue was
$116 and $401 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018,
as compared to $587 and $681for the same period in the last fiscal
year. Corporate assets mainly consisted of cash and
prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of stock
option expenses, salaries, insurance, professional expenses and
directors' fees. Corporate expenses are allocated to the four
segments. The following segment information table includes segment
operating income or loss after including the corporate expenses
allocated to the segments, which gets eliminated in the
consolidation.
The following segment information is un-audited for the three and
six months ended December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017:
Business Segment
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$6,989
|
$183
|
$8,835
|
$58
|
$1
|
|
2017
|
$8,738
|
$293
|
$8,837
|
$56
|
$37
|
|
2018
|
8,830
|
(117)
|
23,750
|
1,059
|
2,296
|
|
2017
|
9,541
|
853
|
23,591
|
913
|
1,558
|
|
2018
|
3,860
|
342
|
759
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
3,142
|
220
|
621
|
-
|
-
|
|
2018
|
56
|
(17)
|
3,449
|
28
|
-
|
|
2017
|
76
|
(19)
|
3,624
|
50
|
-
|
|
2018
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
-
|
|
2018
|
-
|
(41)
|
76
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
(102)
|
88
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$19,735
|
$350
|
$36,895
|
$1,145
|
$2,297
|
|
2017
|
$21,497
|
$1,245
|
$36,789
|
$1,019
|
$1,595
|
The following segment information is unaudited for the period
referenced below:
Business Segment
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$3,352
|
$76
|
$8,835
|
$29
|
$-
|
|
2017
|
$3,973
|
$107
|
$8,837
|
$28
|
$2
|
|
2018
|
4,393
|
21
|
23,750
|
547
|
1,083
|
|
2017
|
4,936
|
517
|
23,591
|
466
|
1,064
|
|
2018
|
1,916
|
170
|
759
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
1,606
|
119
|
621
|
-
|
-
|
|
2018
|
29
|
(5)
|
3,449
|
14
|
-
|
|
2017
|
37
|
(9)
|
3,624
|
25
|
-
|
|
2018
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
-
|
|
2018
|
-
|
(35)
|
76
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
(36)
|
88
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$9,690
|
$227
|
$36,895
|
$590
|
$1,083
|
|
2017
|
$10,552
|
$698
|
$36,789
|
$519
|
$1,066
|
* Fabrication services is
a discontinued operation.
17. OTHER INCOME, NET
Other
income / (expenses) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
26
|
12
|
36
|
20
|
Other
rental income
|
29
|
27
|
56
|
53
|
Exchange
loss
|
(28)
|
(25)
|
(67)
|
(31)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
22
|
28
|
65
|
158
|
Total
|
$49
|
$42
|
$92
|
$200
|
18. INCOME TAX
The
Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes and income tax assets and liabilities,
including evaluating uncertainties in the application of accounting
principles and complex tax laws. The statute of limitations, in
general, is open for years 2014 to 2017 for tax authorities in
those jurisdictions to audit or examine income tax returns. The
Company is under annual review by the tax authorities of the
respective jurisdiction to which the subsidiaries
belong.
The U.S
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on
December 22, 2017. The Tax Act, among other things reduces the U.S.
federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0%, eliminated
corporate Alternative Minimum Tax, modified rules for expensing
capital investment, and limited the deduction of interest expense
for certain companies. The Tax Act is a fundamental change to the
taxation of multinational companies, including a shift from a
system of worldwide taxation with some deferral elements to a
territorial system, current taxation of certain foreign income, a
minimum tax on low tax foreign earnings, and new measures to
curtail base erosion and promote U.S. production.
As the
Company has a June 30 fiscal year end, the lower corporate income
tax rate will be phased in, resulting in a lower U.S. statutory
federal rate. In accordance with Section 15 of the Internal Revenue
Code, the Company applied a blended U.S. statutory federal income
tax rate of 27.5% for the year ended June 30, 2018. Accounting
Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740 requires filers to
record the effect of tax law changes in the period enacted. During
fiscal year of 2018, the Company recognized income tax expenses of
$900 related to the one-time deemed repatriation. No expenses have
been recognized related to the deferred tax re-measurement and
minimum tax on low tax foreign earnings. However, SEC issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), that permits
filers who may not have the necessary information available,
prepared, or analyzed (including computations) for certain income
tax effects of the Act in order to determine a reasonable estimate
to be recorded as provisional amounts during a measurement period
ending no later than one year from the date of
enactment.
Certain
material provisions affecting the Company is provided
below.
One-Time Mandatory Repatriation
One of
the effects of the Tax Act is to transition from a world-wide to a
territorial tax system. The Tax Act requires a mandatory one-time
repatriation of certain post-1986 earnings and profits that were
deferred from U.S. taxation by the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries. The basis of the tax is on cash held and specified
assets which are taxed at 15.5% and 8%, respectively. The Company
has elected to pay the repatriation tax over an 8-year
period.
The
Company recorded an estimated $900 charge in fiscal 2018 related to
the one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of deferred
foreign income, which was included in the provision for income
taxes on our consolidated income statements and income taxes on our
consolidated balance sheets, based on existing tax laws and the
best information available as of the date of estimate.
As of
December 31, 2018, the initial estimate for the one-time transition
tax was adjusted to reflect final computation using all available
data and tax legislation published post estimate. In the second
quarter of fiscal 2019 upon finalization of our accounting
analysis, we reversed $145 from the provision of income tax thus
reducing the tax liability related to the one-time transition tax
to $755. The adjustments materially impact our provision for income
taxes and effective tax rate. The significant change is due to the
update of information from additional analysis performed on foreign
tax pools and earnings and profits computations where the
information is available post estimate. The transition
tax may change in the future due to changes in tax law as enacted
by the US Government, new guidance from federal and state
regulators and related interpretations of the Tax Act.
Minimum Tax on Low Tax Foreign Earnings
The Tax
Act implemented the inclusion in gross income for the Global
Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI) for any taxable year beginning on
or after January 1, 2018. This provision significantly expands
current taxation of foreign subsidiary corporate earnings. The
Company must generally include in current income all earnings of
the foreign subsidiaries in excess of the assumed deemed return on
tangible assets of the foreign subsidiaries. Given the complexity
of GILTI provision, the company is still assessing the effects of
the provisions to determine whether to elect to either provide for
the minimum tax as future income tax expense as a period expense or
as a deferred tax on the related investment in foreign
subsidiaries.
Deferred Tax Re-Measurement
The
re-measurement is based on the expected reversals of the deferred
taxes at the estimated US federal tax rates of 28.0% for the
current fiscal year and 21.0% for future fiscal years. As the
Company established a full valuation allowance on the U.S. deferred
tax assets, the Company has not recognized any income tax effects
for the deferred tax re-measurement under the Tax Act. The
Company’s accounting for the any possible income tax effects
for the deferred tax re-measurement will be completed during the
measurement period, which should not extend beyond one year from
the enactment date.
The
Company accrues penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits when necessary as a component of penalties and interest
expenses, respectively. The Company had not accrued any penalties
or interest expenses relating to unrecognized benefits as of
December 31, 2018.
19. REVENUE
The
Company generates revenue primarily from 3 different segments:
Manufacturing, Testing and Distribution. The Company accounts for a
contract with a customer when there is approval and commitment from
both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment
terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and
collectability of consideration is probable. The Company’s
revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the
arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes.
The revenues are recognized as separate performance obligations
that are satisfied by transferring control of the product or
service to the customer.
Significant Judgments
The
Company’s arrangements with its customers include various
combinations of products and services, which are generally capable
of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance
obligations. A product or service is considered distinct if it is
separately identifiable from other deliverables in the arrangement
and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other
resources that are readily available to the customer.
The
Company allocates the transaction price to each performance
obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis (SSP).
Determining the SSP for each distinct performance obligation and
allocation of consideration from an arrangement to the individual
performance obligations and the appropriate timing of revenue
recognition are significant judgments with respect to these
arrangements. The Company typically establishes the SSP based on
observable prices of products or services sold separately in
comparable circumstances to similar clients. The Company may
estimate SSP by considering internal costs, profit objectives and
pricing practices in certain circumstances.
Warranties,
discounts and allowances are estimated using historical and recent
data trends. The Company includes estimates in the transaction
price only to the extent that a significant reversal of revenue is
not probable in subsequent periods. The Company’s products
and services are generally not sold with a right of return, nor has
the Company experienced significant returns from or refunds to its
customers.
Manufacturing
The
Company primarily derives revenue from the sale of both front-end
and back-end semiconductor test equipment and related peripherals,
maintenance and support of all these products, installation and
training services and the sale of spare parts. The Company’s
revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the
arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales
taxes.
The
Company recognizes revenue at a point in time when the Company has
satisfied its performance obligation by transferring control of the
product to the customer. The Company uses judgment to evaluate
whether the control has transferred by considering several
indicators, including:
● whether the Company has a present right to
payment;
● the customer has legal title;
● the customer has physical possession;
● the customer has significant risk and rewards of
ownership; and
● the customer has accepted the product, or whether
customer acceptance is considered a formality based on history of
acceptance of similar products (for example, when the customer has
previously accepted the same equipment, with the same
specifications, and when we can objectively demonstrate that the
tool meets all of the required acceptance criteria, and when the
installation of the system is deemed perfunctory).
Not all
of the indicators need to be met for the Company to conclude that
control has transferred to the customer. In circumstances in which
revenue is recognized prior to the product acceptance, the portion
of revenue associated with its performance obligations to install
product is deferred and recognized upon acceptance.
The
majority of sales under Manufacturing segment include a standard
12-month warranty. The Company has concluded that the warranty
provided for standard products are assurance type warranties and
are not separate performance obligations. Warranty provided for
customized products are service warranties and are separate
performance obligations. Transaction prices are allocated to this
performance obligation using cost plus method. The portion of
revenue associated with warranty service is deferred and recognized
as revenue over the warranty period, as the customer simultaneously
receives and consumes the benefits of warranty services provided by
the Company.
Testing
The
Company rendered testing services to manufacturers and purchasers
of semiconductors and other entities who either lack testing
capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are
insufficient. The Company primarily derives testing revenue from
burn-in services, manpower supply and other associated services.
Standalone Selling price is directly observable from the sales
orders. Revenue is allocated to performance obligations satisfied
at a point in time depending upon terms of the sales order.
Generally, there is no other performance obligation other from what
has been stated inside the sales order for each of these
sales.
Terms
of contract that may indicate potential variable consideration
included warranty, late delivery penalty and reimbursement to solve
non-conformance issues for rejected products. Based on historical
and recent data trends, it is concluded that these terms of the
contract do not represent potential variable consideration. The
transaction price is not contingent on the occurrence of any future
event.
Distribution
The
Company distributes complementary products particularly equipments,
industrial products and components by manufacturers mainly from the
U.S., Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The Company recognizes revenue from
product sales at a point in time when the Company has satisfied its
performance obligation by transferring control of the product to
the customer. The Company uses judgment to evaluate whether the
control has transferred by considering several indicators discussed
above. Generally, the Company recognizes the revenue at a point in
time, generally upon shipment or delivery of the products to the
customer or distributors, depending upon terms of the sales
order.
Method and Impact of Adoption
Effective
as of July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from contracts with
Customers (Topic 606), and its related amendments using the
modified retrospective transition method. This method was applied
to contracts that were not complete as of the date of adoption.
Under the modified retrospective transition approach, periods prior
to the adoption date were not adjusted and continue to be reported
in accordance with ASC 605.
An
assessment was made on the impact of all existing arrangements as
at the date of adoption, under ASC 606, to identify the cumulative
effect of applying ASC 606 on the beginning retained earnings. The
Company quantified the impact of the adoption on its’
financial position, results of operations and cash flow. The
impact amounted to 0.06% of fiscal 2018 revenue or $28, which is
immaterial to the Company. Hence, based on materiality
principle, the Company concluded that the cumulative adjustment is
not required to be made to the Company’s Beginning Retained
Earnings.
The
impact is primarily driven by the changes related to the accounting
of standard warranty. Prior to adoption of ASC 606, the Company
accounted for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of
sales when revenue was recognized. Upon adoption of ASC 606, the
standard warranty for customized products is recognized as a
separate performance obligation.
The
Company has completed its adoption and implemented policies,
processes and controls to support the standard’s measurement
and disclosure requirements. The Company recognizes net product
revenue when its satisfies the obligations as evidenced by the
transfer of control of its products and services to customers. The
guidance did not have material impact on the company’s
consolidated financial results.
Contract Balances
The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections
may result in accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract
liabilities (deferred revenue) on the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet. A receivable is recorded in the period
the Company delivers products or provides services when the Company
has an unconditional right to payment.
Contract assets primarily relate to the value of products and
services transferred to the customer for which the right to payment
is not just dependent on the passage of time. Contract assets are
transferred to receivable when rights to payment become
unconditional.
A contract liability is recognized when the Company receives
payment or has an unconditional right to payment in advance of the
satisfaction of performance. The contract liabilities represent (1)
Deferred product revenue relates to the value of products that have
been shipped and billed to customers and for which the control has
not been transferred to the customers, and (2) Deferred service
revenue, which is recorded when the Company receives consideration,
or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior
to transferring services to the customer under the terms of a sales
contract. Deferred service revenue typically results from warranty
services, and maintenance and other service contracts.
As of
July 1, 2018, deferred income amounting to $260 was reclassified
from other receivables to contract assets and customer deposits
amounting to $31 was reclassified from accrued expenses to contract
liabilities in order to establish the new opening balance for
contract assets and liabilities.
The
Company’s payment terms and conditions vary by contract type,
although terms generally include a requirement of payment of 70% to
90% of total contract consideration within 30 to 60 days of
shipment, with the remainder payable within 30 days of acceptance.
In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from
the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its
contracts generally do not include a significant financing
component.
Contract assets were recorded under other receivable while
contract liabilities were recorded under accrued expenses in the
balance sheet.
The
following table is the reconciliation of contract
balances.
|
Dec 31, 2018
(Unaudited)
$
|
July 1, 2018 (Unaudited)
$
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
6,996
|
7,747
|
Trade
Accounts Payable
|
2,532
|
3,704
|
Contract
Assets
|
238
|
260
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
1,034
|
31
|
Remaining Performance Obligation
The remaining performance obligation (RPO) disclosure provides the
aggregate amount of the transaction price yet to be recognized as
of the end of the reporting period and an explanation as to when
the company expects to recognize these amounts in revenue. It is
intended to be a statement of overall work under contract that has
not yet been performed and does not include contracts in which the
customer is not committed. The customer is not considered committed
when they are able to terminate for convenience without payment of
a substantive penalty. The disclosure includes estimates of
variable consideration, except
when the variable consideration is a sales based or usage-based
royalty promised in exchange for a license of intellectual
property. Additionally, as a practical expedient, the Company does
not include contracts that have an original duration of one year or
less. Remaining performance obligation estimates are subject to
change and are affected by several factors, including terminations,
changes in the scope of contracts, periodic revalidations, and
adjustment for revenue that has not materialized and adjustments
for currency.
As at December 31, 2018, the aggregate amount of the transaction
price allocated to RPO related to customer contracts that are
unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied was $1,158. Given the profile
of contract terms, approximately 21.1% percent of this amount is
expected to be recognized as revenue over the next two years,
approximately 78.9% percent between three and five years and the
balance thereafter.
Practical
Expedients
The Company applies the following practical
expedients:
●
The
Company accounts for shipping and handling costs as activities to
fulfill the promise to transfer the goods, instead of a promised
service to its customer.
●
The
Company has not elected to adjust the promised amount of
consideration for the effects of a significant financing component
as the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period
between when the entity transfers a promised good or service to a
customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will
generally be one year or less.
●
The
Company has elected to adopt the practical expedient for contract
costs, specifically in relation to incremental costs of obtaining a
contract.
Costs to obtain a contract are not material, and the Company
generally expenses such costs as incurred because the amortization
period is one year or less.
20. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company adopted ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share.
Basic Earnings Per Share
(“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to
common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding (denominator) during the
period. Diluted EPS give effect to all dilutive
potential common shares outstanding during a period. In
computing diluted EPS, the average price for the period is used in
determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the
exercise of stock options and warrants.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the
years presented herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from
continuing operations, net of tax
|
$346
|
$678
|
$415
|
$1,254
|
Income
/ (loss) attributable to Trio-Tech International common
shareholders from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
2
|
(5)
|
(2)
|
(6)
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$348
|
$673
|
$413
|
$1,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding - basic
|
3,673
|
3,548
|
3,673
|
3,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
108
|
245
|
142
|
222
|
Number
of shares used to compute earnings per share - diluted
|
3,781
|
3,793
|
3,815
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.09
|
0.19
|
0.11
|
0.35
|
Basic earnings
per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Basic earnings per share from net income attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.09
|
$0.19
|
$0.11
|
$0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.09
|
0.18
|
0.11
|
0.34
|
Diluted
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Diluted earnings per share from net income attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.09
|
$0.18
|
$0.11
|
$0.34
|
21. STOCK OPTIONS
On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2007 Employee Plan”) and the 2007 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2007 Directors Plan”), each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 3, 2007. Each of
those plans was amended during the term of such plan to increase
the number of shares covered thereby. As of the last amendment
thereof, the 2007 Employee Plan covered an aggregate of 600,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock and the 2007 Directors
Plan covered an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock. Each of those plans terminated by its respective
terms on September 24, 2017. These two plans were administered by
the Board, which also established the terms of the
awards.
On September 14, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2017 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2017 Employee Plan”) and the 2017 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2017 Directors Plan”) each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 4, 2017. Each of
these plans is administered by the Board of Directors of the
Company.
Assumptions
The fair value for the options granted were estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions, assuming no expected
dividends:
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
47.29% to 104.94
|
%
|
|
|
60.41% to 104.94
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.30% to 0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.30% to 0.78
|
%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of
the Company’s stock. Due to higher volatility, the
observation is made on a daily basis for the three months ended
December 31, 2018. The observation period covered is consistent
with the expected life of options. The expected life of the options
granted to employees has been determined utilizing the
“simplified” method as prescribed by ASC Topic
718 Stock
Based Compensation, which,
among other provisions, allows companies without access to adequate
historical data about employee exercise behavior to use a
simplified approach for estimating the expected life of a "plain
vanilla" option grant. The simplified rule for estimating the
expected life of such an option is the average of the time to
vesting and the full term of the option. The risk-free rate is
consistent with the expected life of the stock options and is based
on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
2017 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2017 Employee Plan permits the grant of stock
options to its employees covering up to an aggregate of 300,000
shares of Common Stock. Under the 2017 Employee Plan, all options
must be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value
as of the grant date and the options granted must be exercisable
within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant, or such
lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option
agreements. The options may be exercisable (a) immediately as of
the effective date of the stock option agreement granting the
option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related to the date of
the grant of the option, the date of first employment, or such
other date as may be set by the Compensation Committee. Generally,
options granted under the 2017 Employee Plan are exercisable within
five years after the date of grant, and vest over the period as
follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the remaining balance
vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding
anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based compensation will
be recognized in terms of the grade method on a straight-line basis
for each separately vesting portion of the award. Certain option
awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in
control (as defined in the 2017 Employee Plan).
On December 4, 2018, the Company granted options to purchase 16,000
shares of its Common Stock to employee pursuant to the 2017
Employee Plan. There were no stock options exercised during the
six-month period ended December 31, 2018. The Company recognized $8
stock-based compensation expenses during the six-month period ended
December 31, 2018.
The Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2017 Employee
plan during the six months ended December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2018, there were vested employee stock options
granted under the Employee Plan 2017 covering a total of 19,000
shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was
$5.51 and the weighted average contractual term was 4.37
years.
A
summary of option activities under the 2017 Employee Plan during
the six months ended December 31, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
60,000
|
$5.98
|
4.73
|
$-
|
Granted
|
16,000
|
3.75
|
4.93
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2018
|
76,000
|
5.51
|
4.37
|
-
|
Exercisable at December 31,
2018
|
19,000
|
5.51
|
4.37
|
-
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the six months ended December 31, 2018 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2018
|
45,000
|
$5.98
|
Granted
|
16,000
|
3.75
|
Vested
|
(4,000)
|
(5.51)
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested at December 31,
2018
|
57,000
|
$5.51
|
2007 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2007 Employee Plan terminated by its terms on
September 24, 2017 and no further options may be granted
thereunder. However, the options outstanding thereunder continue to
remain outstanding and in effect in accordance with their terms.
The Employee Plan permitted the grant of stock options to its
employees covering up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of Common
Stock. Under the 2007 Employee Plan, all options were required to
be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value as of
the grant date and the options granted were required to be
exercisable within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant,
or such lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option
agreements. The options were permitted to be exercisable (a)
immediately as of the effective date of the stock option agreement
granting the option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related
to the date of the grant of the option, the date of first
employment, or such other date as may be set by the Compensation
Committee. Generally, options granted under the 2007 Employee Plan
are exercisable within five years after the date of grant, and vest
over the period as follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the
remaining balance vesting in equal installments on the next three
succeeding anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based
compensation will be recognized in terms of the grade method on a
straight-line basis for each separately vesting portion of the
award. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if
there is a change in control (as defined in the 2007 Employee
Plan).
The
Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee
Plan during the six months ended December 31, 2018.
There were 50,000 of options exercised during the six-month period
ended December
31, 2018. The
Company recognized $1 stock-based compensation expenses during the
six months ended December
31,
2018.
The
Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee
Plan during the six months ended December 31, 2017. There were no
options exercised during the six months ended December 31, 2017.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $3 in
the six months ended December 31, 2017 under the 2007 Employee
Plan. The balance unamortized stock-based compensation of $3 based
on fair value on the grant date related to options granted under
the 2007 Employee Plan is to be recognized over a period of three
years. The weighted-average remaining contractual term for
non-vested options was 3.77 years.
As of December 31, 2018, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2007 Employee Plan covering a total of 48,750 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.59 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 2.61
years.
As of December 31, 2017, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2007 Employee Plan covering a total of 79,375 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.36 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 1.86
years.
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the six months ended December 31, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.10
|
$121
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(50,000)
|
3.25
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
|
77,500
|
$3.68
|
2.71
|
$-
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2018
|
48,750
|
$3.59
|
2.61
|
$-
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the six months ended December 31, 2018 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the six months ended December 31, 2017 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2017
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
3.10
|
$187
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.60
|
$445
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2017
|
79,375
|
$3.36
|
1.86
|
$290
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the six months ended December 31, 2017 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2017
|
48,125
|
$3.77
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2017
|
48,125
|
$3.77
|
2017 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2017 Directors Plan permits the grant of options covering up to an
aggregate of 300,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the
form of non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise
price of the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2019, the Company did
not grant any options pursuant to the 2017 Directors Plan. There
were no stock options exercised during the six-month period ended
December 31, 2018. The Company did not recognize any stock-based
compensation expenses during the six months ended December 31,
2018.
During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2018, the Company did
not grant any options pursuant to the 2017 Directors
Plan.
2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2007 Directors Plan terminated by its terms on September 24, 2017
and no further options may be granted thereunder. However, the
options outstanding thereunder continue to remain outstanding and
in effect in accordance with their terms. The Directors Plan
permitted the grant of options covering up to an aggregate of
500,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the form of
non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise price of
the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2019, the Company did
not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan. There
were 70,000 of stock options exercised during the six-month period
ended December 31, 2018. The Company did not recognize any
stock-based compensation expenses during the six months ended
December 31, 2018.
During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2018, the Company did
not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan. There
were 15,000 of stock options exercised during the six-month period
ended December 31, 2017. The Company did not recognize any
stock-based compensation expenses during the six months ended
December 31, 2017.
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the six months ended December 31, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
390,000
|
$3.41
|
2.05
|
$412
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(70,000)
|
3.39
|
-
|
-
|
|
(20,000)
|
(3.62)
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2018
|
300,000
|
$3.40
|
2.08
|
$-
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2018
|
300,000
|
$3.40
|
2.08
|
$-
|
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the three months ended December 31, 2017 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2017
|
415,000
|
$3.36
|
2.93
|
$673
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(15,000)
|
2.76
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2017
|
400,000
|
$3.38
|
2.49
|
$1,452
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2017
|
400,000
|
$3.38
|
2.49
|
$1,452
|
22. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS APPROXIMATE
CARRYING VALUE
In accordance with ASC Topics 825 and 820, the following presents
assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value and
classified by level of fair value measurement
hierarchy:
There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the three and
six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount approximates
fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Restricted term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Lines of credit (Level 3) – The carrying value of the lines
of credit approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of
the obligations.
Bank loans payable (Level 3) – The carrying value of the
Company’s bank loan payables approximates its fair value as
the interest rates associated with long-term debt is adjustable in
accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds
with similar terms and remaining maturities.
22. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Subsequent to 31 December 2018, the Company has completed the sales
transaction for seven units of our Mao Ye Property in China,
Chongqing with net book value of RMB 905, approximately $135 for a
selling price of RMB 3,314, approximately $493.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Overview
The following should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated unaudited financial statements and notes in Item I
above and with the audited consolidated financial statements and
notes, and the information under the heading and
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.
Trio-Tech
International (“TTI”) was incorporated in 1958 under
the laws of the State of California. As used herein, the term
“Trio-Tech” or “Company” or
“we” or “us” or “Registrant”
includes Trio-Tech International and its subsidiaries unless the
context otherwise indicates. Our mailing address and executive
offices are located at 16139 Wyandotte Street, Van Nuys, California
91406, and our telephone number is (818) 787-7000.
The
Company is a provider of reliability test equipment and services to
the semiconductor industry. Our customers rely on us to verify that
their semiconductor components meet or exceed the rigorous
reliability standards demanded for aerospace, communications and
other electronics products.
TTI generated approximately 99.7% of its revenue from its three
core business segments in the test and measurement industry, i.e.
manufacturing of test equipment, testing services and distribution
of test equipment during the three months ended December 31, 2018.
To reduce our risks associated with sole industry focus and
customer concentration, the Company expanded its business into the
real estate investment and oil and gas equipment fabrication
businesses in 2007 and 2009, respectively. The Company’s
Indonesia operation and the Indonesia operation’s immediate
holding company, which comprised the fabrication services segment,
suffered continued operating losses since it commenced its
operations, and the cash flow was minimal in the past years. The
Company established a restructuring plan to close the fabrication
services operation, and in accordance with ASC Topic 205,
Presentation of Financial Statement Discontinued Operations
(“ASC Topic 205”), the Company presented the operation
results from fabrication services as a discontinued operation. The
Real Estate segment contributed only 0.3% to the total revenue and
has been insignificant since the property market in China has
slowed down due to control measures in China.
Manufacturing
TTI
develops and manufactures an extensive range of test equipment used
in the "front end" and the "back end" manufacturing processes of
semiconductors. Our equipment includes leak detectors, autoclaves,
centrifuges, burn-in systems and boards, HAST testers, temperature
controlled chucks, wet benches and more.
Testing
TTI
provides comprehensive electrical, environmental, and burn-in
testing services to semiconductor manufacturers in our testing
laboratories in Asia and the U.S. Our customers include both
manufacturers and end-users of semiconductor and electronic
components, who look to us when they do not want to establish their
own facilities. The independent tests are performed to industry and
customer specific standards.
Distribution
In addition to marketing our proprietary products, we distribute
complementary products made by manufacturers mainly from the U.S.,
Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The products include environmental
chambers, handlers, interface systems, vibration systems, shaker
systems, solderability testers and other semiconductor equipment.
Besides equipment, we also distribute a wide range of components
such as connectors, sockets, LCD display panels and touch-screen
panels. Furthermore, our range of products are mainly targeted for
industrial products rather than consumer products whereby the life
cycle of the industrial products can last from 3 years to 7
years.
Real Estate
Beginning in 2007, TTI has invested in real estate property in
Chongqing, China, which has generated investment income from the
rental revenue from real estate we purchased in Chongqing, China,
and investment returns from deemed loan receivables, which are
classified as other income. The rental income is generated from the
rental properties in MaoYe and FuLi in Chongqing, China. In the
second quarter of fiscal 2015, the investment in JiaSheng, which
was deemed as loans receivable, was transferred to down payment for
purchase of investment property in China.
Second Quarter Fiscal 2019 Highlights
●
Total
revenue decreased by $862, or 8.2%, to $9,690 for the second
quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $10,552 for the same period
in fiscal 2018.
●
Manufacturing
segment revenue decreased by $621, or 15.6%, to $3,352 for the
second quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $3,973 for the same
period in fiscal 2018.
●
Testing
segment revenue decreased by $543, or 11.0%, to $4,393 for the
second quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $4,936 for the same
period in fiscal 2018.
●
Distribution
segment revenue increased by $310, or 19.3%, to $1,916 for the
second quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $1,606 for the same
period in fiscal 2018.
●
Real
estate segment revenue decreased by $8, or 21.6%, to $29 for the
second quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $37 for the same
period in fiscal 2018.
●
Gross
profit margin in absolute dollars decreased by $537, or 19.2%, to
$2,258 for the second quarter of fiscal 2019, as compared to $2,795
for the same period in fiscal 2018.
●
The
overall gross profit margin decreased by 3.2% to 23.3% for the
second quarter of fiscal 2019, from 26.5% for the same period in
fiscal 2018.
●
Income
from operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2019 was $227, a
decrease of $471 or 67.5%, as compared to $698 for the same period
in fiscal 2018.
●
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $5, or 0.3%, to $1,722 for
the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, from $1,727 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Selling
expenses decreased by $65, or 25.8%, to $187 for the second quarter
of fiscal year 2019, from $252 for the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Other
income increased by $7 to $49 in the second quarter of fiscal year
2019 compared to $42 for the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Income
Tax benefit for the second quarter of fiscal year 2019 was $124, a
change of $137, as compared to income tax expenses of $13 for the
same period in fiscal year 2018.
●
During
the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, income from continuing
operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax was $302, an
decrease of $373, as compared to $675 for the same period in fiscal
year 2018.
●
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest for the second
quarter of fiscal year 2019 was $42, as compared to nil for the
same period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Working
capital increased by $936, or 10.1%, to $10,164 as of December 31,
2018, compared to $9,288 as of June 30, 2018.
●
Earnings
per share for the three months ended December 31, 2018 was $0.09,
an decrease of $0.10, as compared to $0.19 for the same period in
fiscal year 2018.
●
Total
assets increased by $421 or 1.1% to $36,895 as of December 31,
2018, compared to $36,474 as of June 30, 2018.
●
Total
liabilities increased by $411 or 3.2% to $13,384 as of December 31,
2018, compared to $12,973 as of June 30, 2018.
Results of Operations and Business Outlook
The following table sets forth our revenue components for the three
and six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
34.6%
|
37.7%
|
35.4%
|
40.6%
|
Testing
Services
|
45.3
|
46.8
|
44.7
|
44.4
|
Distribution
|
19.8
|
15.2
|
19.6
|
14.6
|
Real
Estate
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Revenue for the three months and six months ended December 31, 2018
was $9,690 and $19,735, respectively, a decrease of $862 and
$1,762, respectively, when compared to the revenue for the same
periods of the prior fiscal year. As a percentage, revenue
decreased by 8.2% for the three and six months ended December 31,
2018, when compared to total revenue for the same periods of the
prior year.
For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the $862 decrease in
overall revenue was primarily due to
●
decrease
in the manufacturing segment in the Singapore
operations,
●
decrease
in the testing segment in the Malaysia and Tianjin, China
operations; and
●
decrease
in the distribution segment in Malaysia operations,
These decreases were partially offset by the
●
an
increase in the testing segment in the Singapore operations;
and
●
an
increase in the distribution segment in the Singapore and Bangkok,
Thailand operations
For the six months ended December 31, 2018, the $1,762 decrease in
overall revenue was primarily due to
●
decrease
in the manufacturing segment in the Singapore and Suzhou, China
operations,
●
decrease
in the testing segment in the Tianjin, China Operations and
Malaysia operations; and
These decreases were partially offset by the
●
an
increase in the distribution segment in the Singapore
operations
Revenue into and within China, the Southeast Asia regions and other
countries (except revenue into and within the U.S.) decreased by
$740 (or 7.3%) to $9,460, and by $1,584 (or 7.7%) to $19,035 for
the three months and six months ended December 31, 2018,
respectively, as compared with $10,200 and $20,619, respectively,
for the same periods of last fiscal year.
Revenue into and within the U.S. was $230 and $700 for the three
months and six months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, a
decrease of $122 and $178, respectively, from $352 and $878 for the
same periods of last fiscal year, respectively.
Revenue for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018 is
discussed within the four segments as follows:
Manufacturing Segment
Revenue in the manufacturing segment as a percentage of total
revenue was 34.6% and 35.4% for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2018, respectively, a decrease of 3.1% and 5.2% of
total revenue, respectively, when compared to the same periods of
the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of revenue
decreased by $621 to $3,352 from $3,973 and decreased by $1,749 to
$6,989 from $8,738 for the three and six months ended December 31,
2018, respectively, compared to the same periods of the last fiscal
year.
The revenue in the manufacturing segment from a major customer
accounted for 39.0% and 47.5% of our total revenue in the
manufacturing segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively, and 39.4% and 42.3% of our total revenue in
the manufacturing segment for the six months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
The future revenue in our manufacturing segment will be
significantly affected by the purchase and capital expenditure
plans of this major customer, if the customer base cannot be
increased.
Testing Services Segment
Revenue in the testing segment as a percentage of total revenue was
45.3% and 44.7% for the three and six months ended December 31,
2018, a decrease of 1.5% and an increase of 0.3%, respectively, of
total revenue when compared to the same periods of the last fiscal
year. The absolute amount of revenue decreased by $543
to $4,393 from $4,936 and by $711 to $8,830 from $9,541 for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2018, respectively,
compared to the same periods of the last fiscal
year.
The revenue in the testing segment from a major customer accounted
for 73.3% and 78.9% of our revenue in the testing segment for the
three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and
74.6% and 78.6% of our total revenue in the manufacturing segment
for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The future revenue in our testing segment will be affected by the
demands of this major customer, if the customer base cannot be
increased. Demand for testing services varies from country to
country depending on changes taking place in the market and our
customers’ forecasts. As it is difficult to
accurately forecast fluctuations in the market, management believes
it is necessary to maintain testing facilities in close proximity
to our customers in order to make it convenient for them to send us
their newly manufactured parts for testing and to enable us to
maintain a share of the market.
Distribution Segment
Revenue in the distribution segment as a percentage of total
revenue was 19.8% and 19.6% for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2018, an increase of 4.6% and 5.0%, respectively,
when compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal
year. The absolute amount of revenue increased by $310
to $1,916 from $1,606, and increased by $718 to $3,860 from $3,142
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018, respectively,
compared to the same periods of the last fiscal
year.
Demand in the distribution segment varies depending on the demand
for our customers’ products and the changes taking place in
the market and our customers’ forecasts. Hence it
is difficult to accurately forecast fluctuations in the
market.
Real Estate Segment
The real estate segment accounted for 0.3% of total net revenue for
the three and six months ended December 31, 2018. The absolute
amount of revenue in the real estate segment decreased by $8 to $29
from $37 and by $20 to $56 from $76 for the three and six months
ended December 31, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods
of the last fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to a
decrease in rental income in the real estate segment for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2018.
During the first quarter of 2019, Management decided to sell our
Mao Ye Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties.
In order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. In accordance with ASC Topic
360, as there was an intention to sell the investment properties,
the property was reclassified from investment property, which had a
net book value of RMB 2,729, or approximately $397 as at December
31, 2018, to assets held for sale.
Uncertainties and Remedies
There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties
when forecasting performance, such as the constantly changing
nature of technology, specific requirements from the customer,
decline in demand for certain types of burn-in devices or
equipment, decline in demand for testing services and fabrication
services, and other similar factors. One factor that influences
uncertainty is the highly competitive nature of the semiconductor
industry. Another is that some customers are unable to provide a
forecast of the products required in the upcoming weeks; hence it
is difficult to plan for the resources needed to meet these
customers’ requirements due to short lead time and last
minute order confirmation. This will normally result in a lower
margin for these products, as it is more expensive to purchase
materials in a short time frame. However, the Company has taken
certain actions and formulated certain plans to deal with and to
help mitigate these unpredictable factors. For example, in order to
meet manufacturing customers’ demands upon short notice, the
Company maintains higher inventories, but continues to work closely
with its customers to avoid stock piling. We believe that we have
improved customer service from staff by keeping our staff through
our efforts to keep our staff up to date on the newest technology
and stressing the importance of understanding and meeting the
stringent requirements of our customers. Finally, the Company is
exploring new markets and products, looking for new customers, and
upgrading and improving burn-in technology while at the same time
searching for improved testing methods of higher technology
chips.
We are in the process of implementing an ERP System, as part of a
multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes.
The implementation of this ERP system is scheduled to occur in
phases over the next few years, and began with the migration of
certain of our operational and financial systems in our Singapore
operations to the new ERP system during the second quarter of
fiscal 2017. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the
operational and financial systems in Singapore were substantially
transitioned to the new system.
This implementation effort continued in fiscal 2019. The
operational and financial systems in our Malaysia operation have
been substantially transitioned to the new system during the first
quarter of fiscal 2019.
As a phased implementation of this system occurs, we are
experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which,
in turn, result in changes to our internal control over financial
reporting. While we expect the new ERP system to strengthen our
internal financial controls by automating certain manual processes
and standardizing business processes and reporting across our
organization, management will continue to evaluate and
monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each
of the affected areas evolve.
The Company’s primary exposure to movements in foreign
currency exchange rates relates to non-U.S. dollar-denominated
sales and operating expenses in its subsidiaries. Strengthening of
the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies adversely affects
the U.S. dollar value of the Company’s foreign
currency-denominated sales and earnings, and generally leads the
Company to raise international pricing, potentially reducing demand
for the Company’s products. Margins on sales of the
Company’s products in foreign countries and on sales of
products that include components obtained from foreign suppliers
could be materially adversely affected by foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations. In some circumstances, for competitive or other
reasons, the Company may decide not to raise local prices to fully
offset the dollar’s strengthening, or at all, which would
adversely affect the U.S. dollar value of the Company’s
foreign currency-denominated sales and earnings. Conversely, a
strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar,
while generally beneficial to the Company’s foreign currency
denominated sales and earnings could cause the Company to reduce
international pricing, thereby limiting the benefit. Additionally,
strengthening of foreign currencies may also increase the
Company’s cost of product components denominated in those
currencies, thus adversely affecting gross margins.
There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties
when forecasting performance of our real estate segment, such as
obtaining the rights by the joint venture to develop the real
estate projects in China, inflation in China, currency fluctuations
and devaluation, and changes in Chinese laws, regulations, or their
interpretation.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 and December
31, 2017
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of
income data as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of sales
|
76.7
|
73.5
|
Gross Margin
|
23.3%
|
26.5%
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
17.8%
|
16.4%
|
Selling
|
1.9
|
2.4
|
Research
and development
|
1.3
|
1.1
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
-
|
Total
operating expenses
|
21.0%
|
19.9%
|
Income from Operations
|
2.3%
|
6.6%
|
Overall Gross Margin
Overall gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased by 3.2%
to 23.3% for the three months ended December 31, 2018, from 26.5%
in the same period of the last fiscal year. In terms of absolute
dollar amounts, gross profits decreased by $537 to $2,258 for the
three months ended December 31, 2018, from $2,795 as compared to
the same period of the last fiscal year. There was an decrease in
gross profit margin, in absolute dollars, across all segments
except for distribution and real estate.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing
segment decreased by 1.7% to 21.1% for the three months ended
December 31, 2018, from 22.8% in the same period of the last fiscal
year. The decrease in gross margin was due to the change in product
mix in the Singapore operations, where there was an increase in
sales of products that had lower profit margins and a decrease in
sales of products that had higher profit margins as compared to the
same period of last fiscal year. As a result, the decrease in
manufacturing revenue was higher than the decrease in cost for the
three months ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. In absolute dollar amounts, gross profits
in the manufacturing segment decreased by $199 to $706 for the
three months ended December 31, 2018 from $905 for the same period
of last fiscal year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing
segment decreased by 4.8% to 29.3% for the three months ended
December 31, 2018, from 34.1% in the same period of the last fiscal
year. The decrease in profit margin as a percentage of
revenue was mainly due to a decrease in high margin testing revenue
in Singapore Operations. The decrease of gross margin was further
impacted by the decrease of sales in Malaysia operation and
Tianjin, China Operation where significant portions of our
cost of goods sold are fixed and as the demand of services and
factory utilization decrease, the fixed costs are spread over the
decreased output, which decreases the gross profit margin. In
absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the testing segment
decreased by $398 to $1,287 for the three months ended December 31,
2018 from $1,685 for the same period of the last fiscal
year.
Gross profit margin of the distribution segment is not only
affected by the market price of our products, but also by our
product mix, which changes frequently as a result of changes in
market demand. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in
the distribution segment increased by 1.0% to 13.3% for the three
months ended December 31, 2018, from 12.3% in the same period of
the last fiscal year. The increase in gross margin as a
percentage of revenue was due to the change in product mix in the
distribution segment of the Singapore and Suzhou, China operations
resulting in an increase in sales of products that had higher
profit margin and a decline in sales of products that had lower
profit margin, as compared to the same period of last fiscal year.
In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the
distribution segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018
was $254, an increase by $57 as compared to $197 in the same period
of last fiscal year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate
segment was 37.9% for the three months ended December 31, 2018, as
compared to 21.6% in the same period of the last fiscal year. In
absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the real estate segment
for the three months ended December 31, 2018 was $11, an increase
of $3 from $8 in the same period of last fiscal
year
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
$1,722
|
$1,727
|
Selling
|
187
|
252
|
Research
and development
|
122
|
118
|
Total
|
$2,031
|
$2,097
|
General and administrative expenses decreased by $5, or 0.3%, from
$1,727 to $1,722 for the three months ended December 31, 2018
compared to the same period of last fiscal year. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the
decrease in payroll related expenses in the U.S. operation and
traveling expenses in Tianjin, China operations. This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in the Singapore operations as a
result of additional headcount in the three months ended December
31, 2018 as compared to the same period of last fiscal
year.
Selling expenses decreased by $65, or 25.8%, for the three months
ended December 31, 2018, from $252 to $187, as compared to the same
period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to
lower commission expenses in the Singapore operations and U.S
operations as the commissionable revenue decreased in the three
months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the same period of
last fiscal year.
Research and development expenses increased by $4, for the three
months ended December 31, 2018, from $118 to $122, as compared to
the same period of the last fiscal year. The marginal increase was
mainly due to Singapore operations.
Income from Operations
Income from operations was $227 for the three months ended December
31, 2018, as compared to $698 for the same period of last fiscal
year. The decrease was mainly due to the lower gross profit margin
as we discussed earlier. Decrease in gross profit margin is greater
than the decrease in operating expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the second quarter of fiscal years 2019 and
2018 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
$98
|
$52
|
Interest expense increased by $46 to $98 from $52 for the three
months ended December 31, 2018. The increase was due to increase
utilization of short-term loan in the Singapore Operation and
long-term loan in the Malaysia Operation. As of December 31, 2018,
the Company had an unused line of credit of $3,959 as compared to
$4,018 at June 30, 2018. The bank loan payable increased by $1,201
to $3,005 for the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to
$1,804 as at June 30, 2018.
Other Income
Other income for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
$26
|
$12
|
Other
rental income
|
29
|
27
|
Exchange
loss
|
(28)
|
(25)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
-
|
-
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
22
|
28
|
Total
|
$49
|
$42
|
Other income for the three months ended December 31, 2018 was $49,
an increase of $7 as compared to $42 for the same period last
fiscal year. This increase was mainly attributable to higher
interest income received due to placement of interest-bearing
deposits by Malaysia and Singapore Operations.
Income Tax Expenses
Income
Tax benefit for the three months ended December 31, 2018 was $124,
a change of $137 as compared to income tax expense of $13 for the
same period last fiscal year. This change was mainly due to the
reversal of $145 from provision of income tax. The reversal was
made after finalization of One-Time Mandatory Repatriation Tax
summarized in the financial statements under Item 1 above in this
Form 10-Q. Initially, during third quarter of fiscal year 2018, we
made an income tax provision of $900 on an estimated basis. During
the second quarter of fiscal 2019, upon finalization of One-Time
Mandatory Repatriation Tax, we determined that an adjustment was
required, resulting in a $145 tax liability reversal which in turn
reduced the income tax provision to $755. This adjustment
materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax
rate.
The
significant change in the tax liability provision was due to the
update of information from additional analysis performed on foreign
tax pools and earnings and profits computations.
Non-controlling Interest
As of December 31, 2018, we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd., SHI
International Pte. Ltd. and PTSHI Indonesia, and a 76% interest in
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. The non-controlling interest for the
three months ended December 31, 2018, in the net loss of
subsidiaries was $42, compared to nil for the same period of the
previous fiscal year. The decrease in the non-controlling
interest in the net income of subsidiaries was attributable to the
decrease in net income generated by the Malaysia testing operation
due to a decrease in testing revenue which decrease the net
profit.
Profit from Discontinued Operations
Profit from discontinued operations was $4 for the three months
ended December 31, 2018, as compared to a loss of $2 for the same
period of the last fiscal year.
Net Income
Net income was $348 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, a
decrease of $325 as compared to net income of $673 for the three
months ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in net income was
mainly due to the decrease in revenue generated which led to a
decrease in the operating income.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.09 for
the three months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $0.19 for
the same period in the last fiscal year. Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations were nil for both the three months
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.09 for
the three months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $0.18 for
the same period in the last fiscal year. Diluted earnings per share
from discontinued operations were nil for both the three months
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Segment Information
The revenue, gross margin and income from each segment for the
second quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively, are
presented below. As the revenue and gross margin for each segment
have been discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of
income from operations is discussed below.
Manufacturing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
manufacturing segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$3,352
|
$3,973
|
Gross margin
|
21.1%
|
22.8%
|
Income from operations
|
$76
|
$107
|
Income from operations in the manufacturing segment was $76
for the three months ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $31, as
compared to $107 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The
decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $199 in the gross
margin, as discussed earlier while partially offset at decrease of
$168 in operating expenses. Operating expenses for the
manufacturing segment were $630 and $798 for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease
in operating expenses was mainly due to a decrease in selling
expenses of $83, general and administrative expenses of $27 and
corporate overhead of $62, as compared to the same period of last
fiscal year. The decrease in general and administrative expenses
was primarily due to decrease in headcount and fixed assets being
fully depreciated in the Suzhou, China operations. The decrease in
payroll related expenses in U.S. operation also further decrease
the general and administrative expenses. The decrease in selling
expenses was due to a decrease in commission expenses in the U.S.
and Singapore operations as the commissionable revenue decreased as
compared to the same period last fiscal year. The decrease in
corporate overhead expenses was due to a change in the corporate
overhead allocation as compared to the same period last fiscal
year. Corporate charges are allocated on a pre-determined fixed
charge basis.
Testing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
testing segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$4,393
|
$4,936
|
Gross margin
|
29.3%
|
34.1%
|
Income from operations
|
$21
|
$517
|
Income from operations in the testing segment for the three months
ended December 31, 2018 was $21, a decrease of $496 compared to
$517 in the same period of last fiscal year. The decrease in
operating income was mainly attributable to the decrease of $398 in
gross margin, as discussed earlier, coupled with increase in
operating expenses by $98. Operating expenses were $1,266 and
$1,168 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly
attributable to an increase in general and administrative expenses
by $106 and selling expenses of $16, which was partially offset by
a decrease in corporate overhead expenses by $24. The increase in
general and administrative expenses was due to increase of medical
expenses in the Singapore operation. The decrease in corporate
overhead expenses was due to a change in the corporate overhead
allocation as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
Corporate charges are allocated on a pre-determined fixed charge
basis.
Distribution Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
distribution segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$1,916
|
$1,606
|
Gross margin
|
13.3%
|
12.3%
|
Income from operations
|
$170
|
$119
|
Income from operations in the distribution segment increased by $51
to $170 for the three months ended December 31, 2018, as compared
to $119 in the same period of last fiscal year. The increase
in operating income was primarily due to an increase in gross
margin as discussed earlier, which was partially offset by a
decrease in operating expenses of $6. Operating expenses were $84
and $78 for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Real Estate Segment
The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real
estate segment for the three months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$29
|
$37
|
Gross margin
|
37.9%
|
21.6%
|
Loss from operations
|
$(5)
|
$(9)
|
Loss from operations in the real estate segment for the three
months ended December 31, 2018 was $5, a decrease of $4, as
compared to $9 for the same period of the last fiscal
year. The decrease in operating loss was mainly due to
an increase in gross margin as discussed earlier, which was
partially offset by an increase in operating expenses of $1.
Operating expenses were $16 and $17 for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Corporate
The loss from operations for corporate for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Loss income from operations
|
$(35)
|
$(36)
|
Corporate
operating loss decreased by $1 to $35 for the three months ended
December 31, 2018 as compared to of $36 in the same period of the
last fiscal year.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended December 31, 2018 and December
31, 2017
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of
income data as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of sales
|
77.9
|
74.2
|
Gross Margin
|
22.1%
|
25.8%
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
17.6%
|
16.6%
|
Selling
|
1.7
|
2.0
|
Research
and development
|
1.0
|
1.4
|
Total
operating expenses
|
20.3%
|
20.0%
|
Income from Operations
|
1.8%
|
5.8%
|
Overall Gross Margin
Overall gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased by 3.7%
to 22.1% for the six months ended December 31, 2018, from 25.8% in
the same period of last fiscal year, primarily due to an decrease
in the gross profit margin in the manufacturing and testing
segments, which was partially offset by an increase in the gross
profit margin in the distribution and real estate segments. In
terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profits decreased by $1,196
to $4,359 for the six months ended December 31, 2018, from $5,555
for the same period of the last fiscal year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing
segment decreased by 1.8% to 21.3% for the six months ended
December 31, 2018, from 23.1% in the same period of the last fiscal
year. In absolute dollar amounts, gross profit decreased by $535 to
$1,486 for the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to
$2,021 for the same period in last fiscal year. The decrease in
absolute dollar amount of gross margin was primarily due to
decrease in orders Singapore and Suzhou, China operations, which
contributed to a decrease in the gross margin.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing
segment decreased by 6.5% to 26.5% for the six months ended
December 31, 2018 from 33.0% in the same period of the last fiscal
year. The decrease in profit margin as a percentage of revenue
was mainly due to a decrease in high margin testing revenue in
Singapore Operations. Furthermore, there was a decrease in testing
revenue in Malaysia operation and Tianjin, China operation where
significant portions of our cost of goods sold are fixed and as the
demand of services and factory utilization decrease, the fixed
costs are spread over the decreased output, which decreases the
gross profit margin. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross
profit in the testing segment decreased by $810 to $2,341 for the
six months ended December 31, 2018, from $3,151 for the
same period of the last fiscal
year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the distribution
segment increased by 1.7% to 13.3% for the six months ended
December 31, 2018, from 11.6% in the same period of the last fiscal
year. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the
distribution segment for the six months ended December 31, 2018 was
$512, an increase of $147 as compared to $365 in the same period of
the last fiscal year. The increase in absolute dollar amount of
gross margin was due to increase of distribution revenue in
Singapore Operation which were offset by the decrease of
distribution revenue in Malaysia operation. The gross profit
margin of the distribution segment was not only affected by the
market price of our products, but also our product mix, which
changes frequently as a result of changes in market
demand.
Gross
profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate segment
increased by 12.0% to 35.7% for the six months ended December 31,
2018, from 23.7% in the same period of the last fiscal year. In
terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit increased by $2 to
$20 for the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $18
for the same period in last fiscal year.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
$3,481
|
$3,566
|
Selling
|
334
|
431
|
Research
and development
|
194
|
302
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
11
|
Total
|
$4,009
|
$4,310
|
General and administrative expenses decreased by $85, or 2.4%, from
$3,566 to $3,481 for the six months ended December 31, 2018
compared to the same period of the last fiscal year. There was a
decrease in general and administrative expenses in the U.S.,
Tianjin, China operations and Suzhou, China Operations, which was
partially offset by the increase in general and administrative
expenses in all other operations.
The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily
due to the decrease in payroll related and bonus expenses in the
U.S. operations. This increase was partially offset mainly by an
increase in headcount and medical expenses in the Singapore
operation for the six months ended December 31, 2018, as compared
to the same period of last fiscal year.
Selling expenses decreased by $97, or 22.5%, for the six months
ended December 31, 2018, from $431 to $334 compared to the same
period of the last fiscal year, The decrease was mainly due to an
decrease in commission expenses in the U.S operations and Singapore
operations as the commissionable revenue decreased in the six
months ended December 31, 2018, selling expenses is further
decrease due to adoption of a new revenue standard as described in
note 19 to financial statements included in Part1-item1 of this
Form 10-Q as compared to the same period of last fiscal
year.
Research and development expenses decreased by $108, for the six
months ended December 31, 2018, from $302 to $194, as compared to
the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly
due to a decrease of the expenses in Suzhou, China operation. The
Suzhou operation did not incur research and development expenses in
six months ended December 31, 2018 whereas there was a one-off
research and development project in the Suzhou, China operations in
the six months ended December 31, 2017.
Income from Operations
Income from operations was $413 for the six months ended December
31, 2018 as compared to $1,248 for the same period of the last
fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in gross
profit margin being greater than the decrease in operating
expenses, as discussed earlier.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
$176
|
$110
|
Interest expense increased by $66 to $176 from $110 for the six
months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the same period of
the last fiscal year. The increase was due to increase utilization
of short-term loan in the Singapore Operation and long-term loan in
the Malaysia Operation. The bank loan payable increased by $1,201
to $3,005 for the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to
$1,804 as at June 30, 2018.
Other Income
Other income for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
$36
|
$20
|
Other
rental income
|
56
|
53
|
Exchange
loss
|
(67)
|
(31)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
2
|
-
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
65
|
158
|
Total
|
$92
|
$200
|
Other income for the six months ended December 31, 2018 was $92, a
decrease of $108 as compared to $200 for the same period of last
fiscal year. This decrease was mainly attributable to the existence
of a non-recurring reimbursement income for the six months ended
December 31, 2017. This decrease also was caused by foreign
currency exchange loss primarily in Tianjin and Suzhou, China
operations contributing to an exchange loss of $67 for the six
months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to an exchange loss of
$31 for the same period last fiscal year.
Income Tax Expenses
Income
Tax benefit for the three months ended December 31, 2018 was $124,
a change of $137 as compared to income tax expense of $13 for the
same period last fiscal year. This change was mainly due to the
reversal of $145 from provision of income tax. The reversal was
made after finalization of One-Time Mandatory Repatriation Tax
summarized in the financial statements under Item 1 above in this
Form 10-Q. Initially, during third quarter of fiscal year 2018, we
made an income tax provision of $900 on an estimated basis. During
the second quarter of fiscal 2019, upon finalization of One-Time
Mandatory Repatriation Tax, we determined that an adjustment was
required, resulting in a $145 tax liability reversal which in turn
reduced the income tax provision to $755. These adjustment
materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax
rate.
The
significant change in the tax liability provision was due to the
update of information from additional analysis performed on foreign
tax pools and earnings and profits computations.
Non-controlling Interest
As of December 31, 2018, we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech
Malaysia, Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd., SHI International
Pte. Ltd. and PTSHI Indonesia, and a 76% interest in Prestal
Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. The net loss attributable to our
non-controlling interest in these subsidiaries for the six months
ended December 31, 2018 was $101, a decrease of $128, as compared
to net income of $27 for the same period of last fiscal
year. The decrease was attributable to the decrease in net
income generated by the Malaysia testing operation due to a
decrease in testing revenue which decrease the net
profit.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations was $4 for the six months ended
December 31, 2018, a decrease of $1 as compared to a loss of $5 for
the same period of the last fiscal year.
Net Income
Net income was $413 for the six months ended December 31, 2018, a
decrease of $835, as compared to a net income of $1,248 for the
same period in the last fiscal year. The deterioration was mainly
due to a decrease in revenue, gross margin and decrease in
operating income, as discussed earlier.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.11 for
the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $0.35 for the
same period in the last fiscal year. Basic earnings per share from
discontinued operations were nil for both the six months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.11 for
the six months ended December 31, 2018 as compared to $0.34 for the
same period in the last fiscal year. Diluted earnings per share
from discontinued operations were nil for both the six months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Segment Information
The revenue, gross profit margin, and income or loss from
operations in each segment for the six months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, are presented below. As the
segment revenue and gross margin for each segment have been
discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of income
from operations is discussed below.
Manufacturing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
manufacturing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$6,989
|
$8,738
|
Gross margin
|
21.3%
|
23.1%
|
Income from operations
|
$183
|
$293
|
Income from operations from the manufacturing segment was $183
for the six months ended December 31, 2018, a decrease of $110 as
compared to $293 in the same period of the last fiscal year, due to
a decrease in gross margin by $535 which was partially offset by a
decrease in operating expenses. Operating expenses for the
manufacturing segment were $1,303 and $1,728 for the six months
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease in
operating expenses of $425 was mainly due to a decrease in general
and administrative expenses by $94, decreased in selling expenses
by $132, decrease in corporate overhead by $70 and decrease in
research and development expenses by $129, as compared to the same
period of last fiscal year.
Testing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and (loss) / income from operations for
the testing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$8,830
|
$9,541
|
Gross margin
|
26.5%
|
33.0%
|
(Loss) / Income from operations
|
$(117)
|
$853
|
Loss from operations in the testing segment for the six months
ended December 31, 2018 was $117, a deterioration of $970 compared
to income from operation of $853 in the same period of the last
fiscal year. The deterioration was attributable to the
decrease in gross margin by $810. The increase in operating
expenses of $160 also further decrease the operating
income. Operating expenses were $2,458 and $2,298 for the six
months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The higher
operating expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in
general and administrative expenses by $235, which was partially
offset by a decrease in corporate overheads by $115. The increase
in general and administrative expenses was due to increase of
medical expenses and increase of headcount in the Singapore
operations and an increase in payroll related expenses in the
Malaysia operations. The decrease in corporate overhead expenses
was due to a change in the corporate overhead allocation as
compared to the same period last fiscal year. Corporate charges are
allocated on a pre-determined fixed charge basis.
Distribution
Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
distribution segment for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$3,860
|
$3,142
|
Gross margin
|
13.3%
|
11.6%
|
Income from operations
|
$342
|
$220
|
Income from operations in the distribution segment for the six
months ended December 31, 2018 was $342, an increase by $122 as
compared to $220 in the same period of the last fiscal
year. The increase in operating income was primarily due to an
increase in gross margin as discussed earlier which was partially
offset by the increase of operating expenses of $25. Operating
expenses were $170 and $145 for the six months ended December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively.
Real Estate Segment
The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real
estate segment for the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$56
|
$76
|
Gross margin
|
35.7%
|
23.7%
|
Loss from operations
|
$(17)
|
$(19)
|
Loss from operations in the real estate segment for the six months
ended December 31, 2018 was $17, an improvement of $2 as compared
to $19 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The
decrease in operating loss was mainly due to an increase in gross
margin, as discussed earlier. Operating expenses were $37 for the
six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Corporate
The loss from operations for corporate for the six months ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
$(41)
|
$(102)
|
Operating loss in the corporate office for the six months ended
December 31, 2018 was $41, a decrease of $61, as compared to $102
for the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was
mainly due to decrease in staff related expenses and also decrease
in professional fee.
Financial Condition
During the six months ended December 31, 2018 total assets
increased by $421 from $36,474 as at June 30, 2018 to $36,895. The
increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase in
short-term deposits, other receivables, prepaid expenses, assets
held for sale, and property, plant and equipment which were
partially offset by decrease in cash and cash equivalents, trade
receivables, deferred tax asset, investment properties and other
assets.
Cash and cash equivalents were $6,192 as at December 31, 2018,
reflecting a decrease of $347 from $6,539 as at June 30, 2018,
mainly due to placement of interest-bearing deposits by Singapore
and Malaysia operation. This was partially offset by the improved
collections in the U.S. operation.
Short term deposits were $2,121 as at December 31, 2018, reflecting
an increase of $1,468 from $653 as at June 30, 2018, primarily due
to placement of deposit by the Singapore and Malaysia
operation.
As at December 31, 2018, the trade accounts receivable balance
decreased by $751 to $6,996 from $7,747 as at June 30, 2018, mainly
due to decreased sales in Malaysia operation and Tianjin, China
operation for the six months ended December 31, 2018. The accounts
receivables turnover days was 67 and 72 days at the end of the
second quarter of fiscal year 2018 and for the fiscal year ended
2018, respectively.
As at December 31, 2018 other receivables were $991, reflecting an
increase of $110 from $881 as at June 30, 2018. The increase was
primarily due to increase of advance payment made in Singapore
Operation.
Inventories as at December 31, 2018 were $2,630, a decrease of
$300, as compared to $2,930 as at June 30, 2018. The decrease in
inventory was mainly due to Singapore Operation is managing and
monitoring its purchases to meet the requirements and the decrease
in inventory was due to shipments made recently.
Prepaid expenses were $279 as at December 31, 2018 compared to $208
as at June 30, 2018. The increase of $71 was primarily due to
increase in prepayment for insurance expenses and software related
expenses in the Singapore operation.
Investment properties were $678 as at December 31, 2018 compared to
$1,146. The decreases of $468 was primarily due to reclassification
of MaoYe investment properties to assets held for
sales.
Property, plant and equipment, net increased by $814 from $11,935
as at June 30, 2018, to $12,749 as at December 31, 2018, was mainly
due to higher capital expenditure in the Suzhou, China operations ,
Malaysia operation and Tianjin, China operation for the six months
ended December 31, 2018.
Other assets decreased by $499 to $1,750 as at December 31, 2018,
as compared to $2,249 as at June 30, 2018. This was mainly due to
reclassification of down payment made for purchase of property,
plant & equipment to fixed assets by the Malaysia and Tianjin,
China operation.
Assets held for sales were $486 as at December 31, 2018 compared to
$91 as at June 30, 2018. The increase of $395, was primarily due to
reclassification of MaoYe investment properties to assets for
sales.
Accounts payable decreased by $1,172 to $2,532 as at December 31,
2018, as compared to $3,704 as at June 30, 2018. This was mainly
due to more payments released in the first quarter and second
quarter of fiscal year 2019 as compared to fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2018.
Accrued expenses increased by $806 to $3,978 as at December 31,
2018, as compared to $3,172 as at June 30, 2018. The increase in
accrued expenses was mainly due to customer deposits in Singapore
operation and Suzhou, China operations, these increases were
partially offset by decrease in payroll related accruals and
accrued purchases.
Bank loans payable increased by $1,201 to $3,005 as at December 31,
2018, as compared to $1,804 as at June 30, 2018. This was due to an
additional loan availed by the Malaysia operation, which was
partially offset by repayment of bank loans by the Singapore
operation.
Capital leases decreased by $140 to $634 as at December 31, 2018,
as compared to $774 as at June 30, 2018. This was due repayment of
capital leases by the Malaysia and Singapore
operations.
Liquidity Comparison
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $802 to
$2,275 for the six months ended December 31, 2018, compared to
$1,473 during the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase
in net cash generated by operating activities was primarily due to
an increase in cash inflow of $1,236 from accounts receivables and
$465 from other assets, and an increase in cash inflow of $1,447 in
inventories. These were partially offset by an increase in cash
outflow of accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1,221 and
decrease in cash inflow from net income of $963.
Net
cash used in investing activities increased by $2,584 to $3,755 for
the six months ended December 31, 2018, compared to 1,171 during
the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase was
primarily due to $790 in capital spending coupled with increase in
$1,180 in investments in unrestricted short-term deposits and a
decrease of $544 in proceeds from maturing of unrestricted and
restricted term deposits and short-term deposits. This increase in
net cash used in investing activities was partially offset by the
$281 decrease in investments in restricted and unrestricted
deposits.
Net cash generated in financing activities increased by $1,786 to
$1,398 for the six months ended December 31, 2018, compared to net
cash used in financing activities of $388 during the same period of
the last fiscal year. The increase was mainly due to an increase in
proceeds from lines of credit of $5,962 while partially offset by
the decrease in cash generated through borrowings from bank loans
and capital leases by $3,570 and by the increase in repayment lines
of credit of $930.
We believe that our projected cash flows from operations, borrowing
availability under our revolving lines of credit, cash on hand,
trade credit and the secured bank loan will provide the necessary
financial resources to meet our projected cash requirements for at
least the next 12 months.
Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies
Effective
as of July 1, 2018, the Company has adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from contracts with
Customers (Topic 606),, and its related amendments using
modified retrospective transition method. We have completed our
adoption and implemented policies, processes and controls to
support the standard’s measurement and disclosure
requirements as described in note 1 to
the financial statements included in item 1 of this Form
10-Q.
The amendments in ASU 2016-02 ASC Topic 842: Leases become effective for the Company in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. These amendments require companies to recognize
the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term
leases) at the commencement date of the applicable lease: (a) a
lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease
payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and
(b) a right-of-use asset, which is as an asset that represents the
lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified
asset for the lease term. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting
standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
There
have been no other significant changes in the critical accounting
policies from those, disclosed in” Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” included in the most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2018, the end
of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at a reasonable level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as discussed below, there has been no change in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2018, that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation
We are in the process of implementing an ERP System, as part of a
multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes.
The implementation of this ERP system is scheduled to occur in
phases over the next few years, and began with the migration of
certain of our operational and financial systems in our Singapore
operations to the new ERP system during the second quarter of
fiscal 2017. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the
operational and financial systems in Singapore were substantially
transitioned to the new system.
This implementation effort continued in fiscal 2019. The
operational and financial systems in our Malaysia operation have
been substantially transitioned to the new system during the first
quarter of fiscal 2019.
As a phased implementation of this system occurs, we are
experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which,
in turn, result in changes to our internal control over financial
reporting. While we expect the new ERP system to strengthen our
internal financial controls by automating certain manual processes
and standardizing business processes and reporting across our
organization, management will continue to evaluate and
monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each
of the affected areas evolve.
Adoption of New Revenue
Recognition Accounting Standard
We implemented controls relating to adoption of the new revenue
recognition accounting standards that were adopted in fiscal 2019
to ensure that the revenue contracts, and related policies and
process flows were sufficiently reviewed to identify adoption
impacts.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Not applicable.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Malaysia and Singapore regulations prohibit the payment of
dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings
and tax credit. In addition, the payment of dividends can only be
made after making deductions for income tax pursuant to the
regulations. Furthermore, the cash movements from the
Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary to overseas are
restricted and must be authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia.
California law also prohibits the payment of dividends if the
Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet
certain asset to liability ratios.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine
Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other
Information
Not applicable.
31.1
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of
Registrant
31.2
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of
Registrant
32
Section
1350 Certification
101.INS
XBRL
Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Victor H.M. Ting
VICTOR H.M. TING
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 13, 2019
|