Unassociated Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X]
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from ______________ to _______________
|
|
|
Commission File Number: 001-33795
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC.
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Maryland
|
|
68-0666697
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
500 12th Avenue South, Nampa, Idaho
|
|
83651
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (208) 466-4634
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
[X]
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
[ ]
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, 16,191,716 shares outstanding as of August 5, 2011.
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
2
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
25
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
41
|
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
42
|
|
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
43
|
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
|
43
|
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
43
|
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
43
|
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
|
43
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
|
43
|
SIGNATURES
|
45
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
201,944 |
|
|
$ |
416,426 |
|
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
422,142 |
|
|
|
275,180 |
|
FHLB stock, at cost
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease
losses of $13,387 and $15,432
|
|
|
491,421 |
|
|
|
621,010 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
33,519 |
|
|
|
27,955 |
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
12,745 |
|
|
|
12,437 |
|
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets
|
|
|
24,179 |
|
|
|
30,481 |
|
FDIC indemnification receivable, net
|
|
|
58,139 |
|
|
|
64,574 |
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
1,272,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,482,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$ |
133,143 |
|
|
$ |
138,300 |
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
235,061 |
|
|
|
225,794 |
|
Money market
|
|
|
176,180 |
|
|
|
180,454 |
|
Savings
|
|
|
82,774 |
|
|
|
69,079 |
|
Certificates
|
|
|
382,311 |
|
|
|
576,035 |
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
1,009,469 |
|
|
|
1,189,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
5,583 |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
53,422 |
|
|
|
67,622 |
|
Deferred income tax liability, net
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
7,406 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,075,967 |
|
|
|
1,277,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 authorized;
issued and outstanding, none
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 authorized; issued
and outstanding:
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Jun. 30, 2011 - 17,512,197 issued; 16,191,716 outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep. 30, 2010 - 17,460,311 issued; 16,687,561 outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
147,968 |
|
|
|
152,682 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
51,737 |
|
|
|
56,942 |
|
Unearned shares issued to employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
(7,875 |
) |
|
|
(8,657 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
3,954 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
196,827 |
|
|
|
205,088 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$ |
1,272,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,482,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Interest and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases
|
|
$ |
8,824 |
|
|
$ |
6,918 |
|
|
$ |
26,565 |
|
|
$ |
21,054 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
6,392 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
Other interest and dividends
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
11,392 |
|
|
|
8,501 |
|
|
|
33,420 |
|
|
|
26,125 |
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
5,410 |
|
|
|
5,129 |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
2,385 |
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
9,393 |
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
26,241 |
|
|
|
18,611 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
8,811 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
17,430 |
|
|
|
12,236 |
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
6,735 |
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
FDIC indemnification recovery
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Other
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
8,240 |
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
6,780 |
|
|
|
4,660 |
|
|
|
21,054 |
|
|
|
13,966 |
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
Advertising
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Postage and supplies
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
Insurance and taxes
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Provision for REO
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
Other
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
12,423 |
|
|
|
8,668 |
|
|
|
39,965 |
|
|
|
27,311 |
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(3,144 |
) |
|
|
(4,431 |
) |
|
|
(6,835 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,819 |
) |
|
|
(2,654 |
) |
Net loss before extraordinary gain
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
Extraordinary gain, net of tax of $195
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,941 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,612 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share before extraordinary item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
Gain per common share of extraordinary item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,536,539 |
|
|
|
15,543,199 |
|
|
|
15,616,285 |
|
|
|
15,491,203 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,536,539 |
|
|
|
15,543,199 |
|
|
|
15,616,285 |
|
|
|
15,491,203 |
|
Dividends declared per share:
|
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
|
$ |
0.165 |
|
|
$ |
0.165 |
|
See accompanying notes.
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except share data) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Issued to |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
ESOP |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
16,698,168 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
150,782 |
|
|
$ |
64,483 |
|
|
$ |
(9,699 |
) |
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
$ |
209,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issued, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
(25,607 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
ESOP shares committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
Tax adjustments for equity compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Dividends paid ($0.220 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before extraordinary item
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,396 |
) |
Extraordinary gain, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding
loss on securities available-
for-sale, net of taxes of $(49)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Adjustment for realized gains, net
of taxes of $38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
16,687,561 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
152,682 |
|
|
|
56,942 |
|
|
|
(8,657 |
) |
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
205,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock issued, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
27,269 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
ESOP shares committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
956 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
51,886 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541 |
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
Dividends paid ($0.165 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
Stock repurchase
|
|
|
(575,000 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized holding
loss on securities available-
for-sale, net of taxes of $612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
16,191,716 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
147,968 |
|
|
$ |
51,737 |
|
|
$ |
(7,875 |
) |
|
$ |
4,835 |
|
|
$ |
196,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(2,612 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Accretion of FDIC indemnification receivable
|
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investments
|
|
|
4,320 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets and repossessed assets
|
|
|
(581 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
ESOP shares committed to be released
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
8,811 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
Provision for losses on REO and other repossessed assets
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
Accrued deferred compensation expense, net
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(3,082 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
|
|
|
24,133 |
|
|
|
19,239 |
|
Originations of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(18,866 |
) |
|
|
(20,439 |
) |
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(2,377 |
) |
|
|
2,135 |
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(3,912 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
Net cash provided from operating activities
|
|
|
11,058 |
|
|
|
6,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from repayments of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
64,756 |
|
|
|
30,298 |
|
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(241,532 |
) |
|
|
(35,516 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
26,835 |
|
|
|
11,137 |
|
Reimbursement of loan losses under loss share agreement
|
|
|
15,289 |
|
|
|
19,455 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,424 |
) |
|
|
(8,229 |
) |
Net decrease in loans
|
|
|
103,506 |
|
|
|
39,990 |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets and real estate and other property owned
|
|
|
19,490 |
|
|
|
11,229 |
|
Net cash (used by) provided from investing activities
|
|
|
(19,080 |
) |
|
|
68,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(180,193 |
) |
|
|
60,021 |
|
Net decrease in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
(3,947 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Repayment of FHLB advances
|
|
|
(10,602 |
) |
|
|
(15,390 |
) |
Net (repayments of) proceeds from other borrowings
|
|
|
(3,599 |
) |
|
|
4,189 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(6,067 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
(2,588 |
) |
Net cash (used by) provided from financing activities
|
|
|
(206,460 |
) |
|
|
45,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(214,482 |
) |
|
|
120,282 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
416,426 |
|
|
|
49,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
201,944 |
|
|
$ |
170,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
7,352 |
|
|
$ |
7,507 |
|
Taxes
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of real estate owned and other assets in settlement of loans
|
|
$ |
18,162 |
|
|
$ |
11,045 |
|
Fair value adjustment to securities available-for-sale, net of taxes
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements presented in this quarterly report include the accounts of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Home Federal Bank (the “Bank”), which is a state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Nampa, Idaho. The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and are unaudited. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods included herein have been made. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 (“2010 Form 10-K”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 14, 2010.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year’s financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or equity.
Note 2 - Critical Accounting Estimates and Related Accounting Policies
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are considered reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, and thus actual results could differ from the amounts reported and disclosed herein. The Company considers the allowance for loan losses, acquired loans, the indemnification receivable due from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), deferred income taxes and valuation of real estate owned (“REO”) to be critical accounting estimates.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Management recognizes that losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the allowance for loan losses must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis by analyzing several factors including delinquency rates, charge-off rates and the changing risk profile of the Bank’s loan portfolio, as well as local economic conditions such as unemployment rates, bankruptcies and vacancy rates of business and residential properties.
The Company believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to change from period to period, requiring management to make assumptions about probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The impact of a sudden large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.
The Company’s methodology for analyzing the allowance for loan losses consists of specific allocations on significant individual credits and a general allowance amount, including a range of losses. The specific allowance component is determined when management believes that the collectability of an individually reviewed loan has been impaired and a loss is probable. A loan with a specific allowance is charged down to the estimated recoverable amount when the loan enters the process of foreclosure, at which point the specific allowance is classified as loss and is removed. The general allowance component relates to assets with no well-defined deficiency or weakness and takes into consideration loss that is inherent within the portfolio but has not been identified. The general allowance
is determined by applying a historical loss percentage to various types of loans with similar characteristics and classified loans that are not analyzed specifically. Adjustments are made to historical loss percentages to reflect current economic and internal environmental factors such as changes in underwriting standards and unemployment rates that may increase or decrease those loss factors. As a result of the imprecision in calculating inherent and potential losses, a range is added to the general allowance to provide an allowance for loan losses that is adequate to cover losses that may arise as a result of changing economic conditions and other qualitative factors that may alter historical loss experience.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results and decreased by the amount of actual loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. Provisions for losses on covered loans are recorded gross of recoverable amounts from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. The recoverable portion of the provision for loan losses on covered loans is recorded in noninterest income.
Acquired Loans. On August 7, 2009, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss sharing agreements with the FDIC to acquire certain assets and assume deposits and certain other liabilities of Community First Bank, a full-service commercial bank headquartered in Prineville, Oregon (“CFB Acquisition”). Under the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC has agreed to reimburse Home Federal Bank for 80% of losses and certain related expenses up to $34.0 million, and 95% of losses that exceed that amount. Loans acquired in the CFB Acquisition were valued as of the acquisition date in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 141, which has since been superseded by Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 805 [formerly SFAS No. 141(R)]. The Company was not permitted to adopt ASC 805 prior to its effective date, which was October 1, 2009. ASC 310-30 applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. For loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that were accounted for under ASC 310-30, management determined the value of the loan portfolio based on work provided by an appraiser. Factors considered in the valuation were projected cash flows for the loans, the type of loan and related collateral, classification status and current discount rates. Loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition accounted for under ASC 310-30 were not aggregated into pools and are accounted for on a loan-by-loan basis. An allowance for loan losses was established for loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that are not accounted for under ASC 310-30.
On July 30, 2010, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss sharing agreements with the FDIC to acquire certain assets and assume all of the deposits and certain other liabilities of LibertyBank, a full service commercial bank headquartered in Eugene, Oregon (“LibertyBank Acquisition”). Under the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses and certain related expenses. See Note 3 to the Selected Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the LibertyBank Acquisition. Loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are valued as of acquisition date in accordance with ASC 805. Further, the Company elected to account for all loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition within the scope of ASC 310-30. Under ASC 805 and ASC 310-30, loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition were recorded at fair value at acquisition date, factoring in credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of the acquisition date, unlike the loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition, which are accounted for under previous accounting guidance as described above. All loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition have been aggregated into pools of loans with similar risk characteristics to estimate cash flows under ASC 310-30. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single interest rate, cumulative loss rate and cash flow expectation. The Company aggregated all of the loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition into 22 different pools, based on common risk characteristics such as loan classification, loan structure, nonaccrual status and collateral type.
The cash flows expected over the life of the pools are estimated using an internal cash flow model that projects cash flows and calculates the carrying values of the pools, book yields, effective interest income and impairment, if any, based on pool level events. Assumptions as to cumulative loss rates, loss curves and prepayment speeds are utilized to calculate the expected cash flows. Under ASC 310-30, the excess of the expected cash flows at acquisition over the fair value is considered to be the accretable yield and is recognized as interest income over the life of the loan or pool. The excess of the contractual cash flows over the expected cash flows is considered to be the nonaccretable difference. Subsequent increases in cash flow over those expected at purchase date in excess of fair value are recorded as an adjustment to accretable difference on a prospective basis. Any disposals of loans, including sales of
loans, payments in full or foreclosures result in the removal of the loan from the ASC 310-30 portfolio at the carrying amount.
Loans and foreclosed and repossessed assets purchased in the CFB and Liberty Bank Acquisitions that are subject to the loss sharing agreements are referred to herein as “covered loans” and “covered assets.” Loans and real estate and other property owned directly or originated by the Bank or purchased loans not subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are referred to herein as “noncovered loans” and “noncovered assets.”
FDIC Indemnification Receivable. As noted above, in conjunction with the CFB Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. At each acquisition date the Company elected to account for amounts receivable under the loss sharing agreements as an indemnification asset. Subsequent to the acquisitions, changes in the value of the indemnification asset are based upon the estimated losses in the covered assets purchased in the acquisitions. The FDIC indemnification asset is accounted for on the same basis as the related covered loans and is the present value of the cash flows the Company expects the Bank to collect from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. The difference between the present value and the undiscounted cash flow the Company expects the Bank to collect from the FDIC is accreted into noninterest income over the life of the FDIC indemnification receivable.
The FDIC indemnification receivable is adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows based on the loan performance. Any increases in cash flow of the loans over those expected will reduce the FDIC indemnification receivable and any decreases in cash flow of the loans over those expected will increase the FDIC indemnification receivable. The FDIC indemnification receivable will be reduced as loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC. Increases and decreases to the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income.
Real Estate Owned. Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are initially recorded at the lower of cost or fair value at the date of foreclosure minus estimated costs to sell. Any valuation adjustments required at the time of foreclosure are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, the properties are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any subsequent valuation adjustments, operating expenses or income, and gains and losses on disposition of such properties are recognized in current operations. The valuation allowance is established based on our historical realization of losses and adjusted for current market trends.
Deferred Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are reported for temporary differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are computed using the asset and liability approach as prescribed in ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities are expected to be reported in an institution’s income tax returns. The deferred tax provision for the year is equal to the net change in the net deferred tax asset from the beginning to the end of the year, less amounts applicable to the change in value related to investments available-for-sale. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date. The primary differences between financial statement income and taxable income result from acquisition intangibles, the allowance for loan losses, deferred compensation, purchase accounting adjustments and related deferred acquisition gains. Deferred income taxes do not include a liability for pre-1988 bad debt deductions allowed to thrift institutions that may be recaptured if the institution fails to qualify as a bank for income tax purposes in the future.
Note 3 – Acquisition of LibertyBank
As noted above, on July 30, 2010, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss sharing agreements with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and certain other liabilities and acquire certain assets of LibertyBank, headquartered in Eugene, Oregon. LibertyBank operated fifteen locations in central and western Oregon. The LibertyBank Acquisition consisted of assets with a preliminary fair value estimate on the acquisition date of approximately $690.6 million, including $373.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, $197.6 million of loans and leases and $34.7 million of securities. Liabilities with a preliminary fair value estimate of $688.6 million were also assumed, including $682.6 million of deposits. The LibertyBank Acquisition has been incorporated
prospectively in the Company’s financial statements; therefore, year over year results of operations may not be comparable.
Note 4 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company has granted stock compensation awards with non-forfeitable dividend rights, which are considered participating securities. Accordingly, earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed using the two-class method as required by ASC 260-10-45. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (or loss) allocated to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period which excludes the participating securities. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock compensation awards, but excludes awards considered participating securities. ESOP shares are not considered outstanding for EPS until they are committed to be released. The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,941 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,612 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
Allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Net loss allocated to common shareholders
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(1,915 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Net loss allocated to common stock before extraordinary gain
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,584 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding, including shares considered
participating securities
|
|
|
15,686,911 |
|
|
|
15,754,145 |
|
|
|
15,773,664 |
|
|
|
15,734,164 |
|
Less: Average participating securities
|
|
|
(150,372 |
) |
|
|
(210,946 |
) |
|
|
(157,379 |
) |
|
|
(242,961 |
) |
Weighted average shares
|
|
|
15,536,539 |
|
|
|
15,543,199 |
|
|
|
15,616,285 |
|
|
|
15,491,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of dilutive restricted stock
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Weighted average shares and common stock
equivalents
|
|
|
15,536,539 |
|
|
|
15,543,199 |
|
|
|
15,616,285 |
|
|
|
15,491,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share before extraordinary
item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share after extraordinary
item:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options excluded from the calculation due to
their anti-dilutive effect on EPS
|
|
|
878,460 |
|
|
|
873,324 |
|
|
|
878,460 |
|
|
|
873,324 |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized comprehensive income of $2.8 million, compared to comprehensive loss of $1.1 million for the same period a year earlier. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized comprehensive losses of $1.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.
Note 5 - Investment securities
Investment securities available-for-sale consisted of the following at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored
Enterprises (“GSE”)
|
|
$ |
83,188 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
|
$ |
83,297 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
11,588 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Corporate note, FDIC-guaranteed
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE-issued
|
|
|
318,051 |
|
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
325,941 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
414,222 |
|
|
$ |
8,538 |
|
|
$ |
(618 |
) |
|
$ |
422,142 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. GSE
|
|
$ |
51,844 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
52,022 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
6,786 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Corporate note, FDIC-guaranteed
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE-issued
|
|
|
208,492 |
|
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
214,920 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
268,593 |
|
|
$ |
7,036 |
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
$ |
275,180 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities are comprised of fixed and variable-rate residential mortgages.
The fair value of impaired securities, the amount of unrealized losses and the length of time these unrealized losses existed for the periods indicated were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. GSE
|
|
$ |
25,570 |
|
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
25,570 |
|
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE-issued
|
|
|
29,706 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
29,706 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
62,654 |
|
|
$ |
(587 |
) |
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
63,005 |
|
|
$ |
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. GSE
|
|
$ |
14,111 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
14,111 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE-issued
|
|
|
50,997 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
50,997 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
69,206 |
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
69,206 |
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has evaluated these securities and has determined that the decline in fair value is not other than temporary. These securities have contractual maturity dates and management believes it is reasonably probable that
principal and interest balances on these securities will be collected based on the performance, underwriting, credit support and vintage of the loans underlying the securities. However, continued deteriorating economic conditions may result in degradation in the performance of the loans underlying these securities in the future. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of the amortized cost. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not likely that the Company would be required to sell securities in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its cost basis.
The contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from the contractual maturities of such securities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$ |
5,085 |
|
|
$ |
5,096 |
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
3,137 |
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
61,746 |
|
|
|
61,912 |
|
|
|
35,292 |
|
|
|
35,438 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
92,968 |
|
|
|
95,214 |
|
|
|
56,593 |
|
|
|
58,257 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
254,423 |
|
|
|
259,920 |
|
|
|
173,566 |
|
|
|
178,348 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
414,222 |
|
|
$ |
422,142 |
|
|
$ |
268,593 |
|
|
$ |
275,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, the Bank pledged investment securities for the following obligations (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB borrowings
|
|
$ |
39,500 |
|
|
$ |
42,378 |
|
|
$ |
51,174 |
|
|
$ |
54,309 |
|
Treasury, tax and loan funds at the Federal Reserve Bank
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
3,767 |
|
|
|
3,916 |
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
8,959 |
|
|
|
9,384 |
|
|
|
17,784 |
|
|
|
18,804 |
|
Deposits of municipalities and public units
|
|
|
18,694 |
|
|
|
19,588 |
|
|
|
19,977 |
|
|
|
21,106 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
70,007 |
|
|
$ |
74,398 |
|
|
$ |
92,702 |
|
|
$ |
98,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
Loans receivable are summarized by collateral type as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Gross
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Gross
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
133,936 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
$ |
157,574 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
% |
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
18,282 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
20,759 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
204,216 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
228,643 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
356,434 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
406,976 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
10,889 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
24,707 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Commercial and land development
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
21,190 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
30,951 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
48,554 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
50,710 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
56,745 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
57,140 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
66,490 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
57,524 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
108,051 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
6,999 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Gross loans
|
|
|
505,500 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
637,070 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(13,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$ |
491,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
621,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present loans at their recorded investment. Recorded investment includes the unpaid principal balance or the carrying amount of loans plus accrued interest less charge offs and net deferred loan fees. Accrued interest on loans was $1.3 million and $1.5 million as of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 respectively.
The following table presents the recorded investment in nonperforming loans and an aging of performing loans by class as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Nonperforming Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Past Due 90
or More
Days, Still
Accruing
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans
Delinquent
30-59 Days
|
|
|
Loans
Delinquent
60-89 Days
|
|
|
Loans Not
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
111,583 |
|
|
$ |
117,226 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,722 |
|
|
|
9,722 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
133,284 |
|
|
|
139,569 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
10,299 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,299 |
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
254,589 |
|
|
|
266,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,618 |
|
|
|
9,828 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,495 |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
14,672 |
|
|
|
17,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
35,903 |
|
|
|
36,507 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
40,742 |
|
|
|
41,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
|
7,496 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
14,278 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
14,278 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
317,239 |
|
|
|
333,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
16,143 |
|
|
|
16,855 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,438 |
|
|
|
8,560 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
7,481 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
7,481 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
57,166 |
|
|
|
64,647 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
79,747 |
|
|
|
90,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
8,975 |
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
13,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
14,265 |
|
|
|
14,369 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
15,816 |
|
|
|
15,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
49,592 |
|
|
|
50,273 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
15,145 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
15,145 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
157,583 |
|
|
|
172,792 |
|
Total gross loans
|
|
$ |
29,423 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
29,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
474,822 |
|
|
$ |
506,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recorded investment in nonperforming loans as of September 30, 2010 was $35.0 million.
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a monthly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk classification ratings:
Watch: Loans that possess some reason for additional management oversight, such as correctable documentation deficiencies, recent financial setbacks, deteriorating financial position, industry concerns, and failure to perform on
other borrowing obligations. Loans with this classification are to be monitored in an effort to correct deficiencies and upgrade the credit if warranted. At the time of this classification, they are not believed to expose the Bank to significant risk.
Special Mention: Performing loans that have developed minor credit weaknesses since origination. Evidence of credit weakness include the primary source of repayment has deteriorated and no longer meets debt service requirements as defined in policy, the borrower may have a short track record and little depth of management, inadequate current financial information, marginal capitalization, and susceptibility to negative industry trends. The primary source of repayment remains viable but there is increasing reliance on collateral or guarantor support.
Substandard: A loan is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth, liquidity and paying capacity of the borrower or collateral pledged. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values.
Loans not meeting the criteria above are considered to be Pass rated loans. As of June 30, 2011, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Watch
|
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
111,213 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
5,934 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
117,226 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,722 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
87,497 |
|
|
|
8,719 |
|
|
|
21,929 |
|
|
|
21,424 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
139,569 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
204,190 |
|
|
|
10,491 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
|
|
28,888 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
266,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
8,875 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,828 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
7,214 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
12,035 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
17,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
35,707 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
36,507 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
40,383 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
41,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
7,496 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
263,458 |
|
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
24,783 |
|
|
|
34,142 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
333,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
9,828 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
16,855 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
8,560 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
25,913 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
11,812 |
|
|
|
24,890 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
64,647 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
36,610 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
13,567 |
|
|
|
36,899 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
90,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
13,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
13,765 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
14,369 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
15,269 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
15,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
36,235 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
50,273 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
93,251 |
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
21,518 |
|
|
|
53,117 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
172,792 |
|
Total gross loans
|
|
$ |
356,709 |
|
|
$ |
15,811 |
|
|
$ |
46,301 |
|
|
$ |
87,259 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
506,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon currently known information, it is deemed probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the original terms of the agreement with the borrower. The following table summarizes impaired loans at June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with related specific allowance
|
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance
|
|
|
18,162 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
25,071 |
|
|
$ |
15,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific allowance on impaired loans
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
2,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average balance of impaired loans was $25.6 million and $26.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and was $24.7 million and $22.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest income recorded on impaired loans was immaterial during those periods.
The following table presents loans deemed impaired by class of loans as of and during the three months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance
|
|
|
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated
|
|
|
Average Recorded Investment
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
2,346 |
|
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial business and leases
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Total noncovered loans with no related allowance
|
|
|
7,883 |
|
|
|
7,791 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
1,788 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
5,151 |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
1,495 |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Commercial business and leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Total noncovered loans with an allowance recorded
|
|
|
6,906 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
830 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
6,364 |
|
|
|
6,283 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Commercial business and leases
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Total covered loans with no related allowance
|
|
|
10,492 |
|
|
|
10,371 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,312 |
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$ |
25,281 |
|
|
$ |
25,071 |
|
|
$ |
(1,330 |
) |
|
$ |
25,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings totaled $12.2 million and $10.1 million at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, and are included in the impaired loan disclosures above. Of these amounts, $5.5 million and $4.7 million were covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 respectively. There were no commitments to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Acquired with
Deteriorated
Credit Quality
|
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Acquired with
Deteriorated
Credit Quality
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
4,288 |
|
|
$ |
112,938 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
Commercial and multifamily
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
143,006 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
14,379 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
36,173 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
6,824 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
14,700 |
|
|
|
315,846 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
13,452 |
|
Commercial and multifamily
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
24,347 |
|
|
|
41,870 |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
9,209 |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5,895 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
6,363 |
|
|
|
43,512 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
10,371 |
|
|
|
45,905 |
|
|
|
116,516 |
|
Total gross loans
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
11,446 |
|
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
$ |
25,071 |
|
|
$ |
361,751 |
|
|
$ |
119,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Acquired with
Deteriorated
Credit Quality
|
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Acquired with
Deteriorated
Credit Quality
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
3,098 |
|
|
$ |
133,948 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
Commercial and multifamily
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
153,107 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
13,997 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
40,859 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
9,173 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
9,384 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
354,250 |
|
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four- family residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
|
|
16,333 |
|
Commercial and multifamily
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
37,172 |
|
|
|
56,909 |
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,940 |
|
|
|
24,207 |
|
Home equity
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
9,930 |
|
Consumer
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
16,502 |
|
|
|
89,135 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
3,527 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
73,037 |
|
|
|
196,514 |
|
Total gross loans
|
|
$ |
2,521 |
|
|
$ |
12,911 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
9,222 |
|
|
$ |
427,287 |
|
|
$ |
201,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
As of March
31, 2011
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
As of June
30, 2011
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,578 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,102 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
7,694 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
3,314 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
(2,008 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
14,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,811 |
|
|
$ |
(4,188 |
) |
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
13,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
As of
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
Charge-Offs
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
As of June
30, 2011
|
|
Noncovered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
$ |
3,165 |
|
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,497 |
) |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
1,823 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
(947 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5,102 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(2,444 |
) |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
(1,604 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncovered loans
|
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
(2,746 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
(2,943 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four- family residential
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Multifamily residential
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
(4,160 |
) |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
Total real estate construction
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
(4,370 |
) |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Automobile
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Leases
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered loans
|
|
|
3,527 |
|
|
|
7,475 |
|
|
|
(7,737 |
) |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
15,432 |
|
|
$ |
8,811 |
|
|
$ |
(12,739 |
) |
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
13,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three
Months
Ended June
30, 2010
|
|
|
For the Nine
Months
Ended June
30, 2010
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
27,779 |
|
|
$ |
28,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
Losses on loans charged-off
|
|
|
(4,127 |
) |
|
|
(8,312 |
) |
Recoveries on loans charged-off
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Adjustment to original purchase accounting
|
|
|
(9,210 |
) |
|
|
(9,210 |
) |
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
17,872 |
|
|
$ |
17,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank has purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. At the acquisition date, management estimated the fair value of the acquired loan portfolios which represented the expected cash flows from the portfolio discounted at a market-based rate. Included in the estimate of fair value was a discount credit adjustment that reflected expected credit losses. In estimating the preliminary fair value, management calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted contractual cash flows”) and estimated the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal and interest payments (the “undiscounted expected cash flows”). The amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value (the “accretable yield”) is accreted into interest income over the life of the loans. The difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the undiscounted expected cash flows is the nonaccretable difference. The nonaccretable difference represents an estimate of the credit risk in the acquired loan and lease portfolio at the acquisition date. The following table details activity of accretable yield (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of accretable yield
|
|
$ |
28,809 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
35,163 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
Accretable yield recognized as interest income
|
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(9,663 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of accretable yield
|
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount of loans for which income is not being recognized on loans individually accounted for under ASC 310-30 totaled $10.0 million and $20.6 million at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, all of which were purchased in the CFB Acquisition. There were no transfers from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield on loans during the three or nine month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2011, the provision for losses on purchased credit impaired loans totaled $611,000.
Note 7 – Fair Value Measurement
ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values: Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date; Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The Company attempts to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions.
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. GSE
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
83,297 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
83,297 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
Corporate note, FDIC-guaranteed
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE issued
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
325,941 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
325,941 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. GSE
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
52,022 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
52,022 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
Corporate note, FDIC-guaranteed
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, GSE issued
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
214,920 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
214,920 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities, private label
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Additionally, certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These adjustments to fair value generally result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment. The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
16,004 |
|
|
$ |
16,004 |
|
REO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
8,287 |
|
|
|
8,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
6,773 |
|
|
$ |
6,773 |
|
REO
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, based on the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent and have experienced a write-down in carrying value or have a recognized valuation allowance are included in the table above. Impaired loans whose fair value exceeds the carrying value are excluded from the table above as these loans do not represent assets measured and carried at fair value. Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral at June 30, 2011, had a carrying amount of $16.0 million, net of specific valuation allowances totaling $1.3 million. Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $6.8 million, net of specific valuation allowances of $2.5 million at September 30, 2010. Adjustments to the specific valuation allowance caused a release of provision of $815,000 and a provision of $3.3 million during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, and provisions of $757,000 and $5.7 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Fair value for REO is determined by obtaining appraisals on the properties. The fair value under such appraisals is determined by using an income, cost or comparable sales valuation technique. The fair value is then reduced by management’s estimate for the direct costs expected to be incurred in order to sell the property. Holding costs or maintenance expenses are recorded as period costs when incurred and are not included in the fair value estimate. The impact on earnings as a result of write-downs to REO was $296,000 and $418,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and was $1.3 million and $2.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At June 30, 2011, REO carried at fair value consisted of $4.7 million of land, $2.8 million of commercial real estate properties and $779,000 of single family residential properties.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
201,944 |
|
|
$ |
201,944 |
|
|
$ |
416,426 |
|
|
$ |
416,426 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
422,142 |
|
|
|
422,142 |
|
|
|
275,180 |
|
|
|
275,180 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
5,135 |
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
491,421 |
|
|
|
498,556 |
|
|
|
621,010 |
|
|
|
628,281 |
|
FDIC indemnification receivable, net
|
|
|
58,139 |
|
|
|
58,139 |
|
|
|
64,574 |
|
|
|
64,574 |
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and savings deposits
|
|
$ |
627,158 |
|
|
$ |
627,158 |
|
|
$ |
613,627 |
|
|
$ |
613,627 |
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
382,311 |
|
|
|
387,159 |
|
|
|
576,035 |
|
|
|
584,634 |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
53,422 |
|
|
|
55,644 |
|
|
|
67,622 |
|
|
|
71,050 |
|
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Investment securities: The Company’s investment securities available-for-sale consist primarily of securities issued by U.S. Government sponsored enterprises that trade in active markets. These securities are included under Level 2 because there may or may not be daily trades in each of the individual securities and because the valuation of these securities may be based on instruments that are not exactly identical to those owned by the Company.
Loans held for sale: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
FDIC indemnification receivable: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
FHLB stock: The determination of fair value of FHLB stock was impractical due to restrictions on the transferability of the stock.
Loans receivable: Fair values for all performing loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. In addition, the fair value reflects the decrease in loan values as estimated in the allowance for loan losses calculation.
Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
FHLB advances: The fair value of the borrowings is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rate at which similar borrowings with similar remaining maturities could be made.
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Accrued interest payable: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments: Fair values of off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the borrower’s credit standing. The fair value of the fees at June 30, 2011 and 2010, were insignificant.
Note 8 –FDIC Indemnification Receivable
Activity in the FDIC indemnification receivable for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Reimbursement Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
95% |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
84,518 |
|
|
$ |
9,148 |
|
|
$ |
76,305 |
|
|
$ |
(1,788 |
) |
|
$ |
74,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments from FDIC for losses on covered
assets
|
|
|
(19,111 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(15,289 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(15,289 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in estimated losses
|
|
|
(5,764 |
) |
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Discount accretion
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$ |
59,643 |
|
|
$ |
12,481 |
|
|
$ |
59,571 |
|
|
$ |
(1,432 |
) |
|
$ |
58,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the FDIC indemnification receivable for the nine month period ended June 30, 2011, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Reimbursement Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
|
95% |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
80,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,578 |
|
|
$ |
67,933 |
|
|
$ |
(3,359 |
) |
|
$ |
64,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments from FDIC for losses on covered
assets
|
|
|
(19,111 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(15,289 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(15,289 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in estimated losses
|
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
|
|
8,903 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
Discount accretion
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$ |
59,643 |
|
|
$ |
12,481 |
|
|
$ |
59,571 |
|
|
$ |
(1,432 |
) |
|
$ |
58,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For estimated losses on covered assets purchased in the CFB Acquisition, amounts receivable from the FDIC have been estimated at 80% of losses on covered assets (acquired loans and REO) up to $34.0 million. Reimbursable losses in excess of $34.0 million have been estimated at 95% of the amount recoverable from the FDIC. For estimated losses on covered assets purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition, amounts receivable from the FDIC have been estimated at 80% of losses on all covered assets.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements and “Safe Harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
§
|
statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;
|
§
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;
|
§
|
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
|
§
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:
§
|
the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets;
|
§
|
changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas;
|
§
|
changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources;
|
§
|
fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas;
|
§
|
secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market;
|
§
|
results of examinations of the Company by the Federal Reserve, and our bank subsidiary by the FDIC, the Idaho Department of Finance, or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings;
|
§
|
legislative or regulatory changes such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and its implementing regulations that adversely affect our business including the recently enacted financial reform legislation and changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules;
|
§
|
our ability to attract and retain deposits;
|
§
|
our ability to control operating costs and expenses;
|
§
|
the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation;
|
§
|
difficulties in reducing risks associated with the loans on our balance sheet;
|
§
|
staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated charges;
|
§
|
computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach;
|
§
|
our ability to retain key members of our senior management team;
|
§
|
costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments;
|
§
|
our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may acquire from our merger and acquisition activities into our operations, our ability to retain customers and employees and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto;
|
§
|
our ability to manage loan delinquency rates;
|
§
|
the possibility that the expected benefits from the FDIC-assisted acquisitions will not be realized;
|
§
|
increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;
|
§
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
|
§
|
the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions;
|
§
|
our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;
|
§
|
adverse changes in the securities markets;
|
§
|
inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;
|
§
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; and
|
§
|
other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and the other risks described as detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including our 2010 Form 10-K and subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Such developments could have an adverse impact on our financial position and our results of operations.
|
Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this quarterly report and in other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements and you should not rely on such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date hereof. These risks could cause our actual results for fiscal year 2011 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by or on behalf of us, and could negatively affect the Company’s financial condition, liquidity and operating and stock price performance.
Background and Overview
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc., (“we”, “us”, “our” the “Company”), is a Maryland corporation that serves as the holding company for Home Federal Bank (the “Bank”). The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “HOME” and is included in the U.S. Russell 2000® Index.
The Bank is a state-chartered, FDIC-insured commercial bank and is a community-oriented financial institution dedicated to serving the financial service needs of consumers and businesses within its market areas. The Bank’s primary business is attracting deposits from the general public and using these funds to originate loans. The Bank emphasizes the origination of commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans, construction and residential development loans, consumer loans and loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied residential real estate.
On August 7, 2009, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with loss share with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to assume all of the deposits (excluding nearly all brokered deposits) and certain other liabilities and acquire certain assets, including loans and REO of Community First Bank, a full service commercial bank, headquartered in Prineville, Oregon (the “CFB Acquisition”). The loans and REO purchased are covered by loss sharing agreements between the FDIC and Home Federal Bank which afford the Bank significant protection. Under the loss sharing agreements, Home Federal Bank will share in the losses and certain reimbursable expenses on assets covered under the agreement. The FDIC has agreed to reimburse Home Federal Bank for 80% of losses and certain reimbursable expenses up to $34.0 million, and 95% of losses that exceed that amount on covered assets.
On July 30, 2010, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC to assume all of the deposits and certain other liabilities and acquire certain assets of LibertyBank, headquartered in Eugene, Oregon (the “LibertyBank Acquisition”). Nearly all of the loans and REO purchased are covered by loss sharing agreements. The FDIC has agreed to reimburse Home Federal Bank for 80% of losses and certain reimbursable expenses on covered assets. The LibertyBank Acquisition has been incorporated prospectively in the Company’s financial statements and significantly increased the Company’s assets, income and expenses. As a result, year over year results of operations may not be comparable; therefore, we have incorporated narrative that describes changes in the financial position and result of operations of the Company since the previous quarter, which we believe provides the reader with an understanding of the incremental changes in the Company as the acquisitions are integrated.. In certain areas of this discussion and analysis, we have separately disclosed the impact of the LibertyBank Acquisition on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
At June 30, 2011, Home Federal Bank had operations in three distinct market areas including Boise, Idaho, and surrounding communities, together known as the Treasure Valley region of southwestern Idaho, which we refer to as
the Idaho Region. The CFB Acquisition resulted in the Bank’s entrance to the Tri-County Region of Central Oregon, including the counties of Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson. We refer to this market as the Central Oregon Region. In addition to deepening its presence in Central Oregon, as a result of the LibertyBank Acquisition, the Bank also operates in Lane, Josephine, Jackson, and Multnomah counties in Oregon, including the communities of Eugene, Grants Pass and Medford, Oregon. We refer to these markets as our Western Oregon Region. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had 34 full-service banking offices.
The following summarizes key activities of the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2011:
§
|
Net loss totaled $78,000, or $0.01 per share
|
§
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision income totaled $584,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
§
|
The Company repurchased 372,300 shares of its common stock during the quarter at an average cost of $10.50 per share for a total cost of $3.9 million
|
§
|
Net interest income before provision for loan losses increased $858,000 when compared to the linked quarter ended March 31, 2011
|
§
|
The provision for loan losses, net of the FDIC indemnification recovery, totaled $422,000 and the provision for REO totaled $296,000
|
§
|
Noninterest income, excluding the FDIC indemnification recovery, increased by $74,000, or 2.3%, when compared to the linked quarter
|
§
|
Noninterest expense decreased by $1.3 million compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2011
|
§
|
Total assets decreased $62.7 million during the quarter as maturing loans and investments were used to fund maturing certificates of deposit
|
§
|
Nonperforming assets declined $9.3 million, or 14.7%, compared to March 31, 2011
|
§
|
Average core deposits (defined as checking, money market and savings accounts) increased $7.3 million
|
§
|
The Company’s reorganization as a bank holding company and the Bank’s conversion to an Idaho-chartered commercial bank became effective May 31, 2011
|
With the integration of the core processing system and the operations teams of LibertyBank completed in March 2011, the third fiscal quarter of 2011 focused on stabilization and normalization of operational processes throughout the organization. We expect these efforts will continue over the next six months as we scrutinize our organizational structure and build a scalable operational foundation for growth. We are also analyzing the performance of individual branches in our network as we strive to reduce noninterest expense and improve efficiency.
The economies in our primary markets remain weak, with high unemployment and an uncertain economic outlook, which may continue to limit our ability to obtain meaningful loan growth. We will maintain a higher than optimal level of liquidity in the near term to provide flexibility in facilitating potential acquisitions and to prepare for the possibility of higher interest rates. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we reduced certificates of deposits assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition and experienced growth in average core deposits throughout our branch network over the linked quarter, although core deposits were lower at June 30, 2011 compared to March 31, 2011. We anticipate continued declines in certificates of deposit as scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition will increase in the next nine months and will utilize excess cash to fund those withdrawals.
Nonperforming assets and delinquent loans declined during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to March 31, 2011. Noncovered nonperforming assets declined $2.7 million during the quarter and noncovered loans delinquent 30 to 89 days declined to $1.8 million at June 30, 2011, from $3.7 million at March 31, 2011.
Since our conversion to a mutual holding company structure in 2004 and stock holding company structure in 2007, we have been implementing our strategy to transform the Bank’s balance sheet and operations to that of a commercial community bank. We have executed this strategy through organic growth in commercial loans and core deposits and through our FDIC-assisted acquisitions involving Community First Bank in 2009 and LibertyBank in 2010. On May 31, 2011, the Bank’s conversion from a federally chartered stock savings bank to a commercial bank charted in the State of Idaho and the Company’s reorganization as a bank holding company were completed.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Related Accounting Policies
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q provides a description of critical accounting policies and significant estimates in the financial statements that should be considered in conjunction with the reading of this discussion and analysis.
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, total assets decreased $210.1 million, or 14.2%. The changes in total assets were primarily concentrated in the following asset categories (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions
|
|
$ |
201,944 |
|
|
$ |
416,426 |
|
|
$ |
(214,482 |
) |
|
|
(51.5 |
)% |
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
422,142 |
|
|
|
275,180 |
|
|
|
146,962 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
491,421 |
|
|
|
621,010 |
|
|
|
(129,589 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
Cash and equivalents. The decrease in cash and equivalents during fiscal year 2011 from September 30, 2010, was due to the purchase of investment securities and payments on maturing certificates of deposit and borrowings that were not renewed. Cash obtained from the LibertyBank Acquisition in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 was used to purchase investments primarily during the first half of fiscal year 2011. Purchases of investments slowed during the third fiscal quarter due to unattractive yields available in the bond market. We will continue to invest excess cash in medium-term securities in fiscal 2011, but will also conserve some liquidity in order to meet the demand of maturing certificates of deposit assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition, prepare for the potential of rising interest rates, and to provide flexibility for potential acquisitions, repurchases of common stock or the early retirement of FHLB borrowings.
Investments. Investments decreased $17.6 million to $422.1 million at June 30, 2011 when compared to March 31, 2011, yet increased $147.0 million since September 30, 2010. Purchases of investments during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 totaled $8.6 million and had an average yield of 2.82% and an effective duration of 4.0 years. The effective duration of investments purchased in the quarter was longer than previous quarters as we purchased some longer-term municipal bonds. Investment purchases during the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 totaled $241.5 million and have an average yield and effective duration of 2.24% and 3.38 years, respectively. We are targeting medium-term securities in order to reduce price sensitivity and provide liquidity if needed in connection with a future response to an acquisition.
Nearly all of our investment securities are issued by U.S. Government sponsored enterprises, primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. While the U.S. Government has affirmed its support for government sponsored enterprises and the obligations and mortgage-backed securities they issued, significant deterioration in the financial strength of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or mortgage-backed security insurers or actions by the U.S. Government to modify the structure of these government enterprises could have a material effect on the valuation and performance of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio in future periods.
Our exposure to obligations of state and local political subdivisions was $11.5 million, comprising 2.7% of our securities portfolio at June 30, 2011. The following table summarizes the ratings of these securities at June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Standard and Poors
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
Aa2
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of obligations of state and local political
subdivisions
|
|
$ |
3,520 |
|
|
$ |
2,482 |
|
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
$ |
11,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans. Net loans and leases receivable decreased $39.7 million to $491.4 million at June 30, 2011, from $531.1 million at March 31, 2011. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, net loans and leases receivable declined $129.1 million. Noncovered loans declined $11.3 million during the quarter while covered loans purchased in the
CFB Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition declined $6.3 million and $22.9 million, respectively. The carrying amount of covered loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition totaled $64.2 million and $108.6 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011.
One-to-four family residential mortgage loans decreased $23.6 million during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2011 as we originated conventional one-to-four family residential loans primarily for sale in the secondary market. As a result, the residential loan portfolio will likely continue to decline as new loans are not added to the portfolio. We are currently assessing the impact of new regulatory requirements and other rules that may be promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act which could adversely impact the profitability of our mortgage loan activities. We may change the business model or exit this line of business if regulatory and legislative changes materially alter the risk profile or profitability of our mortgage loan and secondary market loan origination programs.
Approximately $20.1 million of the decline in commercial business loans during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2011 was from our wholly owned subsidiary, Commercial Equipment Lease Corporation (“CELC”), which was purchased in connection with the LibertyBank Acquisition. We are not originating new loans or leases in this subsidiary and therefore expect balances in this portfolio to continue to decline rapidly as most of these instruments were originated with terms of five years or less. Approximately $27.1 million in net loans and leases receivable were outstanding in the CELC portfolio as of June 30, 2011.
We also experienced significant reductions in our commercial business loan portfolio during the quarter due to clients refinancing at other institutions in our Western Oregon Region. While some of these balance reductions were favorable as some of those loans were criticized or classified, other loans were refinanced by clients to take advantage of loan term structures or covenant concessions offered by competitors that the Company was unwilling to meet. Excluding declines of equipment financing agreements in our leasing subsidiary, commercial business loans declined $8.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.
We will continue our emphasis on commercial and small business banking products. However, a weak economic outlook may limit our ability to organically generate meaningful loan growth over the next 12 to 18 months.
Asset Quality. Loans in the Company’s organic portfolio have general and specific loss reserves allocated when management has determined it is probable a loss has been incurred. Loans in the Community First Bank portfolio were recorded and are currently accounted for under the business combination rules of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 and Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 310-30. Loans in the Community First Bank portfolio that were not credit impaired on the date of purchase are allocated a general loss reserve. Loans that were credit impaired in the Community First Bank loan portfolio on the date of acquisition are reported at the present value of expected cash flows. No allowance for loan losses is reported on these loans as impairments in excess of the acquisition-date fair value discount result in a partial charge-off of the loan’s remaining unpaid principal balance. The loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are accounted for under the business combination rules of ASC 805 and ASC 310-30, which require all loans acquired in the LibertyBank portfolio to be reported initially at estimated fair value. Loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition have been aggregated into pools and the portion of the fair value discount not related to credit impairment is accreted over the life of the loan into interest income; therefore, loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are not individually identified as nonaccrual loans. Loans purchased in the Community First Bank acquisition were not pooled; therefore, loans that are on nonaccrual status, or are 90 days past due and still accruing interest are reported as nonperforming loans. If a loan pool becomes impaired, an allowance for loan losses is established for the pool.
The indemnified portion of partial charge-offs and provisions for general loan loss reserves for covered loans is recorded in noninterest income and results in an increase in the FDIC indemnification asset.
Loans delinquent 30 to 89 days totaled $1.8 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $8.9 million at September 30, 2010, including $64,000 and $435,000, respectively, of covered loans in the Community First Bank loan portfolio. Nonperforming assets, which include loans delinquent 90 days or more, nonaccrual loans and REO, totaled $53.6 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $65.5 million at September 30, 2010. REO and other repossessed assets decreased $6.3 million or 20.7% to $24.2 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $30.5 million as of September 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, nonperforming assets totaled $53.6 million and $65.5 million, respectively, with noncovered nonperforming assets increasing $1.2 million and covered nonperforming assets decreasing $13.1 million. Noncovered nonperforming assets declined $2.7 million as compared to the linked quarter. The total recorded investment in noncovered loans classified as substandard decreased $4.0 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, while noncovered loans classified as watch and special mention decreased $1.4 million, mostly in the watch classification.
The allowance for loan losses was $13.4 million at June 30, 2011, and $15.4 million at September 30, 2010. The general allowance for loan losses allocated to loans covered under the loss share agreement with the FDIC totaled $3.3 million at June 30, 2011, and the allowance for loan losses allocated to the noncovered organic loan portfolio was $9.5 million, or 2.84% of noncovered loans. Commencing April 1, 2011, we changed our accounting policy for loans that are in process of foreclosure. Previously, such impaired loans were allocated a specific reserve within the allowance for loan losses. These specific reserves are now classified by the Company as “Loss” and the loan balance is charged-down, which results in a reduction in the balance of the allowance for loan losses. At June 30, 2011, loan balances classified as loss that were charged-down totaled $2.4 million, which in previous reporting periods have been disclosed in the balance of the allowance for loan losses. The balance of the allowance for noncovered loan losses that has been specifically allocated to individual noncovered loans totaled $1.3 million at June 30, 2011.
Certain loan modifications or restructurings are accounted for as “troubled debt restructurings.” In general, the modification or restructuring of a debt is considered a troubled debt restructuring if we, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grant a concession to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $12.2 million and $10.1 million at June 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010, respectively. All troubled debt restructurings are considered to be impaired loans, but may not necessarily be placed on nonaccrual status.
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets decreased $6.3 million, or 20.7%, to $24.2 million compared to $30.5 million as of September 30, 2010, and decreased $398,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, REO and other repossessed assets was comprised primarily of $11.3 million of land development and speculative one- to four- family construction projects, $8.3 million of commercial real estate, and $4.1 million of one- to four- family residential properties. Of the $24.2 million of REO and other repossessed assets at June 30, 2011, $17.6 million was covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.
FDIC indemnification receivable. As part of the purchase and assumption agreements for the Community First Bank and LibertyBank acquisitions, we entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. These agreements cover realized losses on covered assets purchased from the FDIC in the CFB Acquisition and LibertyBank Acquisition. The indemnification receivable from the CFB Acquisition increased $5.5 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2011 to $12.7 million, primarily due to an increase in estimated losses. The indemnification receivable from the LibertyBank Acquisition decreased $12.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2011 to $45.4 million primarily due to the receipt of $15.3 million from the FDIC, partially offset by discount accretion and reimbursable expenses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the FDIC indemnification receivable declined $16.4 million primarily due to payments received from the FDIC totaling $15.3 million.
Deposits. Deposits decreased $180.2 million, or 15.1%, to $1.0 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $1.2 billion at September 30, 2010. Core deposits (defined as checking, savings and money market accounts) were $13.5 million, or 2.2%, higher at June 30, 2011, when compared to September 30, 2011. Average core deposits during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, totaled $498.1 million, compared to $485.9 million during the linked quarter.
The following table details the composition of the deposit portfolio and changes in deposit balances as of the balance sheet dates presented (dollars in thousands):
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$ |
133,143 |
|
|
$ |
138,300 |
|
|
$ |
(5,157 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
235,061 |
|
|
|
225,794 |
|
|
|
9,267 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Money market
|
|
|
176,180 |
|
|
|
180,454 |
|
|
|
(4,274 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Savings
|
|
|
82,774 |
|
|
|
69,079 |
|
|
|
13,695 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
382,311 |
|
|
|
576,035 |
|
|
|
(193,724 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
$ |
1,009,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,189,662 |
|
|
$ |
(180,193 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have directed our retail team to attempt to retain maturing certificate of deposit relationships that include a core deposit account. However, we are reluctant to compete for high-rate single account certificate of deposit customers due to our strong liquidity position at June 30, 2011, and consequently expect a managed reduction in these accounts.
Borrowings. FHLB advances and other borrowings decreased $14.2 million, or 21.0%, to $53.4 million compared to $67.6 million at September 30, 2010. The decrease resulted from maturing FHLB advances being repaid with excess liquidity. We will consider the early retirement of our outstanding FHLB advances due to our strong liquidity position if we believe such a transaction to be a prudent use of capital. The estimated prepayment penalty on the outstanding FHLB advances was $2.3 million at June 30, 2011. The weighted average rate on FHLB advances was 4.38% at June 30, 2011, and the weighted average remaining term was 1.26 years.
Equity. Stockholders’ equity decreased $8.3 million, or 4.0%, to $196.8 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $205.1 million at September 30, 2010. The decrease in stockholders’ equity during the nine month period was due to a net loss of $2.6 million, stock repurchases of $6.1 million and $2.6 million in dividends paid. These declines were partially offset by an increase to additional paid in capital due to equity compensation, ESOP transfers and exercised stock options. In addition, the change in market value of available-for-sale securities, net of taxes increased stockholders’ equity by $881,000. At June 30, 2011, the Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 38.27%; Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 37.00%; and Tier 1 capital to average asset ratio was 14.60%. The Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 29.48%; Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 28.21%; and Tier 1 capital to average asset ratio was 11.20%. The Bank was categorized as “Well-Capitalized” at June 30, 2011 under the regulations of the FDIC. The Company’s consolidated tangible common equity ratio was 15.24% at June 30, 2011, compared to 13.60% at September 30, 2010.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010
The LibertyBank Acquisition, which was consummated on July 30, 2010, has been incorporated prospectively in the Company’s financial statements; therefore, year over year results of operations may not be comparable. As a result, management believes comparisons to the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (“linked quarter”) provide a more meaningful analysis of the Company’s results of operations and therefore has included such discussion where appropriate.
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011, was $78,000, or $0.01 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $1.9 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, for the same period last year. Net interest margin increased to 3.23% in the current quarter compared to 2.93% for the same period last year. Total revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, consisting of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding indemnification recoveries and acquisition gains, increased $4.2 million, or 48.7%, to $12.7 million compared to $8.5 million for the same period of 2010. Total noninterest expense increased $3.8 million, or 43.3%, to $12.4 million compared to $8.7 million for the same quarter last year.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $3.5 million, or 58.5%, to $9.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $5.9 million for the same quarter of the prior year. The increase was attributable to the increase in earning assets in fiscal year 2011 due to the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The Company’s net interest margin increased 30 basis points to 3.23% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and increased 41 basis points from the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Our cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined to 0.83% in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to 1.79% in the year-ago period, as a result of rate reductions in all deposit product categories and accretion of fair value adjustments on certificates of deposit assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The year over year decline in net interest margin was due principally to excess cash obtained from the LibertyBank Acquisition which altered the mix of our interest-earning assets. A significant portion of the $373 million of cash obtained in this transaction has been invested in securities and used to pay out maturing certificates of deposit, which has helped to increase the net interest margin in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to the linked quarter. The average yield on earning assets increased to 3.92% in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, from 3.57% in the linked quarter primarily due to an increase of $390,000 in accretable yield on loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The quarterly average balance in the securities portfolio increased only modestly to $434.2 million from $431.5 million in the linked quarter, yet increased by $277.3 million when compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Average loan balances declined by $38.8 million when compared to the linked quarter, and increased by $28.8 million when compared to the same quarter in the previous year. We expect our net interest margin will remain below optimal levels until excess liquidity can be invested into loans. However, the weak economies in our market area may limit our ability to significantly increase loans in the near term.
The following table sets forth the impact to the Company’s net interest income from changes in balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities as well as changes in interest rates (in thousands). The rate column shows the effect attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effect attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, are allocated proportionately to the changes in rate and volume.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Compared to Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Money market accounts
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
Total deposits
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$ |
(1,327 |
) |
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
|
(574 |
) |
Total increase in net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,465 |
|
Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income for the three months ended June 30, 2011, increased $2.9 million, to $11.4 million, from $8.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase during the quarter was primarily attributable to higher levels of interest-earning assets and an increase in the yield earned on loans due the LibertyBank Acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned on investment securities.
The following table compares detailed average earning asset balances, associated yields, and resulting changes in interest and dividend income (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease) in
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest and
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees
|
|
$ |
528,902 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
$ |
500,090 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
182,376 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
139,727 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Investment securities, available-for-sale
|
|
|
434,161 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
156,902 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,326 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
1,163,707 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
$ |
808,792 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
$ |
2,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average yield on interest-earning assets declined in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to the comparable period of 2010 due to the mix of assets shifting to cash and investments from loans. The average yield on loans improved to 6.67% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 due to the LibertyBank Acquisition. The average yield on investment securities and mortgage-backed securities were lower in 2011 as lower yielding securities purchased over the last 12 months have diluted the average yield of the securities portfolio.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $574,000 to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Increased interest expense resulting from higher average balances was offset by a decrease in average deposit rates. Continued runoff in certificates of deposits combined with growth in core deposits resulted in a reduced cost of funds since the last fiscal year end. The cost of funds for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, was 0.83% compared to 0.89% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and 1.79% in the year-ago quarter. The Company anticipates meaningful declines in certificates of deposit balances in the next quarter as maturities of accounts assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition continue. The following table details average balances, cost of funds and the change in interest expense (dollars in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Increase/
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
in Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
$ |
81,795 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
$ |
49,886 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
240,103 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
119,869 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Money market deposits
|
|
|
176,247 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
96,989 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
412,951 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
232,603 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
53,486 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
76,786 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$ |
964,582 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
$ |
576,133 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
$ |
(574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses of $2.8 million was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $3.3 million for the same period of the prior year and $3.0 million for the linked quarter. The provision for noncovered directly originated loans was $200,000 in the June 30, 2011, quarter. The provision related to covered loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition totaled $2.0 million and an indemnification recovery of $1.9 million was recorded in noninterest income during the third fiscal quarter. The provision for loan losses on loans and leases purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition totaled $611,000 during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 and an indemnification recovery of $489,000 was recorded in noninterest income.
While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provision that may be required will not adversely impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators, as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $2.8 million to $5.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $2.9 million for the same quarter a year ago and decreased $387,000 when compared to the linked quarter. Of the $2.8 million year-over-year increase, $2.1 million was attributable to the FDIC indemnification recovery related to the loan loss provision. Excluding the FDIC indemnification recovery, noninterest income increased $74,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to the linked quarter.
The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in components of noninterest income (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
$ |
2,446 |
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
FDIC indemnification recovery
|
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
759.4 |
|
Other
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
931.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$ |
5,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,811 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees increased $121,000, or 5.2% during the most recent quarter, compared to the same quarter of last year primarily due to the increase in accounts assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition. Due to recently enacted regulations, fees from overdrafts (excluding the impact of the LibertyBank Acquisition) declined $708,000, or 54.0%, in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Other noninterest income for the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 includes $355,000 of accretable income related to the FDIC indemnification asset, a decline of $294,000 from the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and an increase of $275,000 over the same quarter in fiscal year 2010. The $587,000 increase in other noninterest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period a year earlier is primarily attributable to yield accretion related to the FDIC indemnification asset.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, increased $3.8 million, or 43.3%, to $12.4 million from $8.7 million for the comparable period a year earlier.
The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in components of noninterest expense (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$ |
6,780 |
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
% |
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Advertising
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
) |
Postage and supplies
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
120.7 |
|
Insurance and taxes
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Provision for REO
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$ |
12,423 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
$ |
3,755 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense was higher during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily as a result of the LibertyBank Acquisition. Expenses remained elevated in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, due to professional services costs associated with the conversion of the processing systems needed to integrate the operations of the LibertyBank Acquisition, a number of ongoing information technology initiatives, fees for external loan review services and assistance with reporting requirements under the FDIC loss share agreements. Provision for loss on REO and other repossessed assets fell $61,000 to $296,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the linked quarter, and was $122,000 less than the $418,000 in the same period a year earlier. The decline in the provision for REO is due to lower balances of noncovered REO in fiscal year 2011. The provision for declines in values of covered REO was reduced by the amount receivable from the FDIC (either 80% or 95% as applicable).
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010
Net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, was $2.6 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $3.9 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, for the same period last year. Net interest margin declined to 2.86% for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.19% for the same period last year. Total revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, which consists of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding indemnification recoveries and acquisition gains, increased $10.8 million, or 41.3%, to $37.1 million compared to $26.3 million for the same period of 2010. Total noninterest expense increased $12.7 million, or 46.3%, to $40.0 million compared to $27.3 million for the same quarter last year.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $7.6 million, or 41.0%, to $26.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $18.6 million for the same quarter of the prior year. The increase was attributable to the increase in earning assets in fiscal year 2011 due to the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The Company’s net interest margin decreased 33 basis points to 2.86% for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010. This decline was due principally to excess cash obtained from the LibertyBank Acquisition. A significant portion of the $373 million of cash obtained in this transaction has been invested in securities and used to pay out maturing certificates of deposit. Our average cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined to 0.94% in the nine months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 1.83% in the year-ago period, primarily as a result of market rate reductions and accretion of fair value adjustments on certificates of deposit assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition.
The following table sets forth the impacts to the Company’s net interest income from changes in balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities as well as changes in interest rates (in thousands). The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). Changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, are allocated proportionately to the changes in rate and volume.
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011
Compared to Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$ |
3,076 |
|
|
$ |
2,425 |
|
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
|
4,644 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
7,352 |
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(2,367 |
) |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$ |
(3,510 |
) |
|
$ |
3,175 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
Total increase in net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,630 |
|
Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest and dividend income for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, increased $7.3 million, to $33.4 million, from $26.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The increase during this nine month period was primarily attributable to higher levels of interest-earning assets and an increase in the yield earned on loans from the LibertyBank Acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in the average yield earned on investment securities.
The following table compares detailed average earning asset balances, associated yields, and resulting changes in interest and dividend income (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Increase/
(Decrease) in
Interest and
Dividend
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees
|
|
$ |
572,820 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
$ |
516,454 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
232,342 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
87,755 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Investment securities, available-for-sale
|
|
|
397,799 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
161,458 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
10,326 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$ |
1,222,789 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
$ |
777,430 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
$ |
7,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The yield on interest-earning assets declined in the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 due to the mix of assets shifting to cash and securities from loans. The average yield on loans improved to 6.17% in the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 due to the LibertyBank Acquisition. The yield on investment securities and mortgage-backed securities were lower in 2011 as lower yielding securities purchased over the last 12 months have diluted the average yield of the securities portfolio.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $335,000, to $7.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, from $7.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the reduction of costs associated with paydowns of FHLB advances, partially offset by increased costs related to the significant amount of certificate of deposits assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition. The following table details average balances, cost of funds and the change in interest expense (dollars in thousands):
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Increase/
(Decrease) in
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
$ |
77,000 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
$ |
45,938 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
235,426 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
110,982 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
175,086 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
85,478 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
469,745 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
228,458 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings
|
|
|
59,096 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
76,818 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,016,353 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
$ |
547,674 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
$ |
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses of $8.8 million was recorded for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $6.4 million for the same period of the prior year. The provision for the current nine month period was comprised of $1.1 million for noncovered directly originated loans, $7.1 million related to covered loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition (with a related indemnification recovery of $6.7 million in noninterest income), and $611,000 related to covered loans and leases purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition (with a related indemnification recovery of $489,000 in noninterest income).
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $9.9 million to $18.1 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $8.2 million for the same period a year ago. FDIC indemnification recovery income, resulting from expected recoveries related to additional loan and REO loss provisions, comprised $7.0 million of the increase.
The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in components of noninterest income (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
$ |
7,138 |
|
|
$ |
6,735 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
FDIC indemnification recovery
|
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
2,502.5 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
478.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$ |
18,104 |
|
|
$ |
8,240 |
|
|
$ |
9,864 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest income for the first nine months of fiscal year 2011 includes $1.9 million of accretable income related to the FDIC indemnification asset compared to $327,000 for the same period in the prior year. Service charges and fees increased $403,000, or 6.0% during the most recent nine month period, compared to the same period last year primarily due to the increase in accounts assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition. Due to recently enacted regulations, fees from overdrafts (excluding the impact of the LibertyBank Acquisition) declined $1.6 million, or 37.6%, in the first nine months of fiscal 2011, compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2010.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, increased $12.7 million, or 46.3%, to $40.0 million from $27.3 million for the comparable period a year earlier.
The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in components of noninterest expense (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$ |
21,054 |
|
|
$ |
13,966 |
|
|
$ |
7,088 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
% |
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
Data processing
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
Advertising
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
Postage and supplies
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
90.3 |
|
Insurance and taxes
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Provision for REO
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$ |
39,965 |
|
|
$ |
27,311 |
|
|
$ |
12,654 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense was higher during the most recent nine month period compared to the same period in fiscal year 2010 primarily as a result of the LibertyBank Acquisition, which accounts for an increase of approximately $8.6 million in noninterest expense. The provision for REO was lower in fiscal year 2011 compared to fiscal year 2010 due to the composition of REO and due to stabilization in commercial real estate values in 2011, albeit at distressed levels.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP), this quarterly report contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with information useful in understanding the Company’s financial performance; however, readers of this report are urged to review these non-GAAP financial measures in conjunction with the GAAP results as reported.
Management believes total revenue is a useful financial measure because it enables investors to assess the Company’s ability to generate income to cover credit losses and operating expenses. Total revenue is the sum of net interest income before provision for loan losses and total noninterest income, excluding FDIC indemnification recovery. The following table presents total revenue (non-GAAP) for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
TOTAL REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for
loan losses
|
|
$ |
9,393 |
|
|
$ |
8,535 |
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
|
$ |
8,568 |
|
|
$ |
5,928 |
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
6,303 |
|
|
|
8,439 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
Less: FDIC indemnification recovery
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
(2,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,996 |
) |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Less: Bargain purchase gain
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(3,209 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
12,711 |
|
|
$ |
11,779 |
|
|
$ |
12,621 |
|
|
$ |
12,800 |
|
|
$ |
8,546 |
|
Management believes pre-tax, pre-provision income (loss) is a useful financial measure because it enables investors to assess the Company’s ability to generate income and capital to cover credit losses through a credit cycle. Management uses this measure to evaluate core operating results exclusive of credit costs, which are often market driven or outside of the Company’s control. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (loss) is calculated starting with net loss and subtracting the income tax benefit or adding back the provision for income taxes and adding back the provision
for loan losses and the provision for REO and other repossessed assets (which is recorded in other noninterest expense). For covered losses and expenses that are subject to loss sharing agreements, the Company also deducts the associated FDIC indemnification recovery reported in noninterest income. Gains on acquisitions are also deducted from the calculation. The following table provides the reconciliation of net loss (GAAP) to pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
PRE-TAX, PRE-PROVISION INCOME
(LOSS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,331 |
) |
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,941 |
) |
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
Provision for REO and other repossessed assets
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
FDIC indemnification recovery
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
(2,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,996 |
) |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Bargain purchase gain
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(3,209 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision income (loss)
|
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
$ |
(1,587 |
) |
|
$ |
(523 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
297 |
|
Management believes tangible common equity, the tangible common equity ratio, and tangible book value per share are meaningful measures of capital adequacy. Tangible common equity is calculated as total stockholders' equity less the core deposit intangible. In addition, tangible assets are total assets less the core deposit intangible. The tangible common equity ratio is calculated as tangible common equity divided by tangible assets. Tangible book value per share is calculated by dividing tangible common equity by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of the period. The following table provides reconciliations of total stockholders’ equity (GAAP) to tangible common equity (non-GAAP), and total assets (GAAP) to tangible assets (non-GAAP), as well as the calculations for the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per share (dollars in thousands, except share data).
|
|
Fiscal Year 2011
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
September 30,
2010
|
|
|
June 30,
2010
|
|
TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
196,827 |
|
|
$ |
198,207 |
|
|
$ |
201,498 |
|
|
$ |
205,088 |
|
|
$ |
205,832 |
|
Subtract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$ |
193,413 |
|
|
$ |
194,617 |
|
|
$ |
197,722 |
|
|
$ |
201,117 |
|
|
$ |
205,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,272,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,335,530 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,655 |
|
|
$ |
1,482,861 |
|
|
$ |
869,222 |
|
Subtract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
|
|
-- |
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$ |
1,269,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,331,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,376,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,478,890 |
|
|
$ |
869,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
16,191,716 |
|
|
|
16,562,213 |
|
|
|
16,710,025 |
|
|
|
16,687,561 |
|
|
|
16,687,760 |
|
Tangible common equity ratio
|
|
|
15.24 |
% |
|
|
14.61 |
% |
|
|
14.36 |
% |
|
|
13.60 |
% |
|
|
23.68 |
% |
Tangible book value per outstanding share
|
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
|
$ |
12.33 |
|
Liquidity, Commitments and Capital Resources
Liquidity. We actively analyze and manage liquidity with the objectives of maintaining an adequate level of liquidity and to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to support loan growth, fund deposit withdrawals, fund operations and satisfy other financial commitments. See the "Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows" contained in Item 1 - Financial Statements, included herein.
The primary sources of funds are customer deposits, loan repayments, loan sales, maturing investment securities, and FHLB advances. These sources of funds are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions and competition. At June 30, 2011, certificates of deposit totaled $382.3 million, or 37.9% of total deposits, including $267.0 million that are scheduled to mature within the next twelve months. We believe our current liquidity position and anticipated operating results are sufficient to fund known, existing commitments and activity levels.
At June 30, 2011, the Bank maintained a borrowing facility with the FHLB of Seattle equal to 40% of total assets to the extent the Bank provides qualifying collateral and holds sufficient FHLB stock. At June 30, 2011, the Bank was in compliance with the collateral requirements and $87.9 million of the line of credit was available. The Bank is highly dependent on the FHLB of Seattle to provide the primary source of wholesale funding for immediate liquidity and borrowing needs. The failure of the FHLB of Seattle or the FHLB system in general, may materially impair the Company’s ability to meet our growth plans or to meet short and long-term liquidity demands.
The increase in liquidity over the last twelve months was primarily attributable to the LibertyBank Acquisition, as the Company received $313.9 million from the FDIC in connection with this acquisition and assumed $59.2 million of cash held by LibertyBank on the acquisition date. Funds obtained from the acquisition of LibertyBank in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 were invested in securities throughout fiscal year 2011. We will continue to invest excess cash in medium-term securities in fiscal 2011, but will also conserve some liquidity in order to meet the demand of maturing certificates of deposit assumed in the LibertyBank Acquisition, prepare for the potential of rising interest rates, and to provide flexibility for potential acquisitions, repurchases of common stock or the early retirement of FHLB borrowings.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of the Bank’s customers. These financial instruments generally include commitments to originate mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, and involve to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bank’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Because some commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The same credit policies are used in making commitments as are used for on-balance sheet instruments. Collateral is required in instances where deemed necessary.
Undisbursed balances of loans closed include funds not disbursed but committed for construction projects. Unused lines of credit include funds not disbursed, but committed for, home equity, commercial and consumer lines of credit.
Commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily used to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
In connection with certain asset sales, the Bank typically makes representations and warranties about the underlying assets conforming to specified guidelines. If the underlying assets do not conform to the specifications, the Bank may have an obligation to repurchase the assets or indemnify the purchaser against loss. These representations and warranties are most applicable to the residential mortgages sold in the secondary market. The Bank believes that the
potential for significant loss under these arrangements is remote. However, past performance may not be representative of future performance on sold loans and the Bank may experience material losses in the future.
The following is a summary of commitments and contingent liabilities with off-balance sheet risks as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Contract or
Notional
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans:
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$ |
13,540 |
|
Adjustable rate
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
Undisbursed balance of loans closed
|
|
|
6,102 |
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
68,063 |
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
91,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital. Consistent with the Bank’s goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, efforts are ongoing to actively seek to maintain a “well capitalized” institution in accordance with regulatory standards. The Company’s consolidated capital ratios at June 30, 2011, were as follows: Tier 1 capital 14.60%; Tier 1 (core) risk-based capital 37.00%; and total risk-based capital 38.27%. The applicable regulatory capital requirements to be considered well capitalized are 5%, 6% and 10%, respectively. The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios at June 30, 2011, were as follows: Tier 1 capital 11.20%; Tier 1 (core) risk-based capital 28.21%; and total risk-based capital 29.48%. As of June 30, 2011, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The Company’s consolidated tangible capital ratio was 15.24% at June 30, 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company’s Board of Directors has established an asset and liability management policy to guide management in maximizing net interest spread by managing the differences in terms between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities while maintaining acceptable levels of liquidity, capital adequacy, interest rate sensitivity, credit risk and profitability. The Asset/Liability Management Committee, consisting of certain members of senior management, communicate, coordinate and manage asset/liability positions consistent with the business plan and Board-approved policies, as well as to price savings and lending products, and to develop new products.
One of the Bank’s primary financial objectives is to generate ongoing profitability. The Bank’s profitability depends primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between the income it receives on its loan and investment portfolio and its cost of funds, which consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The rates the Company earns on assets and pays on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. The Bank’s loans generally have longer maturities than its deposits. Accordingly, the Company’s results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are affected by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of assets and liabilities. The Bank measures its interest rate sensitivity on a quarterly basis using an internal model.
In recent years, the Company has primarily utilized the following strategies in its efforts to manage interest rate risk:
§
|
Reduced our reliance on long-term, fixed-rate one-to-four family residential loans by originating nearly all of these loans for sale in the secondary market;
|
§
|
Increased originations of adjustable-rate commercial and commercial real estate loans;
|
§
|
Reduced our reliance on higher-rate certificates of deposit and FHLB borrowings by focusing on core deposit growth, including checking and savings accounts that are less-sensitive to interest rate changes and have longer average lives than certificates of deposit.
|
Management employs various strategies to manage the Company’s interest rate sensitivity including: (1) selling long-term fixed-rate mortgage loans in the secondary market; (2) borrowing intermediate to long-term funds at fixed rates from the FHLB; (3) originating commercial and consumer loans at shorter maturities or at variable rates; (4)
originating adjustable rate mortgage loans; (5) appropriately modifying loan and deposit pricing to capitalize on the then current market opportunities; and (6) increasing lower cost core deposits, such as savings and checking accounts. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments, and the Bank did not maintain a trading account for any class of financial instruments or engage in hedging activities or purchase high risk derivative instruments. Furthermore, the Company is not subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk.
There has not been any material change in the market risk disclosures contained in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other members of the Company’s management team as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2011, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. A number of internal control procedures were, however, modified during the quarter in conjunction with the Bank's internal control testing, ongoing operational changes and the integration of the application systems of acquired businesses. These controls also relate to the accounting and reporting for acquired loans, which is highly subjective and requires significant estimation of future events. The Company also continued to implement suggestions from its internal auditor and independent registered public accounting firm to strengthen existing controls.
The Company intends to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and to improve its controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that it may discover in the future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning the Company's business. While the Company believes the present design of its disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goal, future events affecting its business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures. The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent every error or instance of fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
|
The following table provides information about repurchases of common stock made by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2011:
|
Period of Repurchase
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
Average Price
Paid Per Share
|
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the
Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2011
|
|
372,300
|
|
$ 10.50
|
|
372,300
|
|
259,900
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
2.1
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement for Community First Bank Transaction (1)
|
2.2
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement for LibertyBank Transaction (2)
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (3)
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (3)
|
10.1
|
Amended Employment Agreement entered into by Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. with Len E. Williams *
|
10.2
|
Amended Severance Agreement with Eric S. Nadeau *
|
10.3
|
Amended Severance Agreement with R. Shane Correa *
|
10.4
|
Amended Severance Agreement with Cindy L. Bateman *
|
10.5
|
Form of Home Federal Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan (4)
|
10.6
|
Form of Director Indexed Retirement Agreement entered into by Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Nampa with each of its Directors (3)
|
10.7
|
Form of Director Deferred Incentive Agreement entered into by Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Nampa with each of its Directors (3)
|
10.8
|
Form of Executive Deferred Incentive Agreement, and amendment thereto, entered into by Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Nampa with Daniel L. Stevens, Robert A. Schoelkoph, and Lynn A. Sander (3)
|
10.9
|
Form of Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement entered into by Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Nampa with Daniel L. Stevens (3)
|
10.10
|
Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement entered into by Home Federal Bank with Len E. Williams (9)
|
10.11
|
Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement entered into by Home Federal Bank with Eric S. Nadeau (9)
|
10.12
|
2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan approved by stockholders on June 23, 2005 and Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (5)
|
10.13
|
2005 Recognition and Retention Plan approved by stockholders on June 23, 2005 and Form of Award Agreement (5)
|
10.14
|
Form of new Director Retirement Plan entered into by Home Federal Bank with each of its Directors (6)
|
10.15
|
Transition Agreement with Daniel L. Stevens (7)
|
10.16
|
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (8)
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act *
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act *
|
32
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act *
|
101 |
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (3) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (5) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (10) |
______________
(1)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 7, 2009
|
(2)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2010
|
(3)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-146289)
|
(4)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-35871)
|
(5)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-127858)
|
(6)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 21, 2005
|
(7)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 21, 2006
|
(8)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-157540)
|
(9)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
(10) |
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
* |
Filed herewith |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
/s/ Len E. Williams
|
|
|
Len E. Williams
|
|
|
President and
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
/s/ Eric S. Nadeau
|
|
|
Eric S. Nadeau
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 |
Amended Employment Agreement entered into by Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. with Len E. Williams *
|
10.2 |
Amended Severance Agreement with Eric S. Nadeau *
|
10.3 |
Amended Severance Agreement with R. Shane Correa *
|
10.4 |
Amended Severance Agreement with Cindy L. Bateman *
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
32
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
101 |
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (3) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (4) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (5) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
46