e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission file number: 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
OHIO
|
|
34-0577130 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH
|
|
44706-2798 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
330.438.3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and small reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
Common Stock, without par value
|
|
96,846,164 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
763,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,352 |
|
|
$ |
2,367,021 |
|
|
$ |
3,942,848 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
|
634,082 |
|
|
|
954,812 |
|
|
|
1,957,473 |
|
|
|
2,968,817 |
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
129,562 |
|
|
|
381,540 |
|
|
|
409,548 |
|
|
|
974,031 |
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
|
107,244 |
|
|
|
176,491 |
|
|
|
358,699 |
|
|
|
517,568 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
19,613 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
84,074 |
|
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
202,670 |
|
|
|
(33,225 |
) |
|
|
449,021 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,319 |
) |
|
|
(11,003 |
) |
|
|
(27,188 |
) |
|
|
(33,375 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
4,294 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(4,519 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
15,820 |
|
|
(Loss) Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(11,785 |
) |
|
|
193,092 |
|
|
|
(55,840 |
) |
|
|
435,760 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
68,121 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
155,078 |
|
|
(Loss) Income From Continuing Operations |
|
|
(18,901 |
) |
|
|
124,971 |
|
|
|
(58,740 |
) |
|
|
280,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
(30,803 |
) |
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
(59,912 |
) |
|
|
26,099 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income |
|
|
(49,704 |
) |
|
|
131,510 |
|
|
|
(118,652 |
) |
|
|
306,781 |
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
(4,877 |
) |
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(50,128 |
) |
|
$ |
130,413 |
|
|
$ |
(113,775 |
) |
|
$ |
303,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to The Timken Companys
Common Shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(19,325 |
) |
|
$ |
123,874 |
|
|
$ |
(53,863 |
) |
|
$ |
277,722 |
|
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(30,803 |
) |
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
(59,912 |
) |
|
|
26,099 |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(50,128 |
) |
|
$ |
130,413 |
|
|
$ |
(113,775 |
) |
|
$ |
303,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Attributable to The Timken
Company Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
(Loss) earnings per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Basic
(loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share Discontinued Operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Diluted
(loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
382,878 |
|
|
$ |
133,383 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
248,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2009 $58,101; 2008 $55,043 |
|
|
458,393 |
|
|
|
575,915 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
716,948 |
|
|
|
1,000,493 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
69,633 |
|
|
|
83,438 |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
17,536 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
Current assets, discontinued operations |
|
|
364,494 |
|
|
|
182,861 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
58,657 |
|
|
|
47,704 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,316,697 |
|
|
|
2,033,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Net |
|
|
1,425,960 |
|
|
|
1,516,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
222,225 |
|
|
|
221,435 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
134,437 |
|
|
|
140,898 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
310,928 |
|
|
|
314,960 |
|
Non-current assets, discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,625 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
47,774 |
|
|
|
38,695 |
|
|
Total Other Assets |
|
|
715,364 |
|
|
|
985,613 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,458,021 |
|
|
$ |
4,536,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
63,323 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
352,558 |
|
|
|
423,523 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
147,848 |
|
|
|
217,090 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,467 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
Current liabilities, discontinued operations |
|
|
44,181 |
|
|
|
21,512 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
268,537 |
|
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
881,507 |
|
|
|
798,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
469,057 |
|
|
|
515,250 |
|
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
786,545 |
|
|
|
830,019 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
611,743 |
|
|
|
613,045 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,479 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
Non-current liabilities, discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,860 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
109,717 |
|
|
|
83,985 |
|
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
|
|
1,985,541 |
|
|
|
2,074,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock without par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 200,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2009 97,020,355 shares;
2008 96,891,501 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated capital |
|
|
53,064 |
|
|
|
53,064 |
|
Other paid-in capital |
|
|
839,719 |
|
|
|
838,315 |
|
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,431,701 |
|
|
|
1,580,084 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(747,157 |
) |
|
|
(819,633 |
) |
Treasury shares at cost (2009 174,191 shares; 2008 344,948 shares) |
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
|
|
(11,586 |
) |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,572,834 |
|
|
|
1,640,244 |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
22,794 |
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
1,590,973 |
|
|
|
1,663,038 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
4,458,021 |
|
|
$ |
4,536,050 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED (USED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(113,775 |
) |
|
$ |
303,821 |
|
Loss (earnings) from discontinued operations |
|
|
59,912 |
|
|
|
(26,099 |
) |
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(4,877 |
) |
|
|
2,960 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
150,835 |
|
|
|
154,965 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
36,142 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
(14,935 |
) |
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
20,490 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
11,561 |
|
|
|
13,171 |
|
Pension and other postretirement expense |
|
|
77,092 |
|
|
|
62,342 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit payments |
|
|
(89,216 |
) |
|
|
(55,783 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
128,359 |
|
|
|
(81,248 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
311,517 |
|
|
|
(213,384 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(169,367 |
) |
|
|
97,129 |
|
Other net |
|
|
(9,862 |
) |
|
|
(15,316 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
391,043 |
|
|
|
248,165 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Discontinued Operations |
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
60,691 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
|
|
424,315 |
|
|
|
308,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(80,953 |
) |
|
|
(176,250 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
30,095 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(57,178 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Continuing Operations |
|
|
(74,133 |
) |
|
|
(199,349 |
) |
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities Discontinued Operations |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
(10,063 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities |
|
|
(75,667 |
) |
|
|
(209,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(34,608 |
) |
|
|
(50,083 |
) |
Net proceeds from common share activity |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
16,879 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
254,051 |
|
|
|
773,301 |
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(53,378 |
) |
|
|
(846,987 |
) |
Short-term debt activity net |
|
|
(37,039 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(248,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities |
|
|
(118,478 |
) |
|
|
(12,742 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
19,325 |
|
|
|
(14,483 |
) |
|
Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
249,495 |
|
|
|
72,219 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
133,383 |
|
|
|
42,884 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
382,878 |
|
|
$ |
115,103 |
|
|
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the Company)
have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
information and notes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.
GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain amounts in
the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements and notes have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation.
On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its Needle
Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation. The financial results for the NRB
operations have been reclassified to Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Refer to
Note 18 Divestitures for further discussion.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company evaluated the classification of its investments held
by the Companys operations in India and concluded that a large portion of these investments should
be considered Cash and cash equivalents on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Companys
conclusion was based on the short-term and highly-liquid nature of the investments. At December
31, 2008, the Company held $23,640 of investments, of which $17,077 has been reclassified from
Other current assets to Cash and cash equivalents to conform to the 2009 presentation for these
investments.
Management has evaluated and disclosed all material events occurring subsequent to the date of the
financial statements up to November 9, 2009, the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued final accounting rules that
established the Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as a single source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as interpretive releases
are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The new accounting rules
established two levels of U.S. GAAP authoritative and non-authoritative. The Codification
supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and was effective for the
Company beginning July 1, 2009. The Codification was not intended to change or alter existing
U.S. GAAP, and as a result, the new accounting rules establishing the Accounting Standards
Codification did not have an impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued new accounting rules concerning fair value measurements. The
new accounting rules establish a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the
new rules expand the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the
fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy.
In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The
implementation of the new accounting rules for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules related to business combinations. The new
accounting rules provide revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration
transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest and
goodwill acquired in a business combination. The new accounting rules expand required disclosures
surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. The new accounting rules
are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of the new accounting rules for business combinations, effective January 1, 2009,
did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
5
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests. The new
accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the Company (sometimes called minority interests) to be clearly identified, presented,
and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from
the parents equity. All changes in the parents ownership interests are required to be accounted
for consistently as equity transactions, and any noncontrolling equity investments in
deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. The new accounting rules on
noncontrolling interests are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively
applied to comparative financial statements. The implementation of new accounting rules on
noncontrolling interests, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In March 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules about derivative instruments and hedging
activities, which amended previous accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
The new accounting rules require entities to provide greater transparency through additional
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The new accounting rules are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of the new accounting rules on
derivative instruments and hedging activities, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures
on derivative instruments and related hedged items and did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition. See Note 16 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities for the expanded disclosures.
In June 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings
per share. The new accounting rules clarify that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. The new accounting rules
provide guidance on how to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute earnings per
share using the two-class method. The new accounting rules are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 31, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new
accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings per share did not have a material
impact on the Companys disclosure of earnings per share. See Note 10 Earnings Per Share for
the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method.
In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on employers disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. The new accounting rules require the disclosure of additional
information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of
fair value measurements and concentrations of risk. These new accounting rules are effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets is not expected to have a material
impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting rules for subsequent events. The new accounting rules
establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The
new accounting rules are effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15,
2009 and were adopted by the Company in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of the new
accounting rules for subsequent events did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
Note 3 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing supplies |
|
$ |
64,140 |
|
|
$ |
71,756 |
|
Work in process and raw materials |
|
|
278,267 |
|
|
|
413,273 |
|
Finished products |
|
|
374,541 |
|
|
|
515,464 |
|
|
Inventories net |
|
$ |
716,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,493 |
|
|
An actual valuation of the inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made only at
the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim
LIFO calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these calculations are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual
results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory
valuation. The LIFO reserve at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $274,950 and $298,195,
respectively. The Companys Steel segment recognized a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $4,130 and
$20,318, respectively, during the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 as a result of
expected lower year-end inventory quantities and material costs, especially scrap steel costs.
6
Note 4 Property, Plant and Equipment
The components of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
622,843 |
|
|
$ |
606,255 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3,032,108 |
|
|
|
2,985,799 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
3,654,951 |
|
|
|
3,592,054 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,228,991 |
) |
|
|
(2,075,082 |
) |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment net |
|
$ |
1,425,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,516,972 |
|
|
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, machinery and equipment included approximately
$114,500 and $120,400, respectively, of capitalized software. Depreciation expense for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $44,992 and $46,488, respectively. Depreciation
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $139,552 and $138,721,
respectively. Depreciation expense on capitalized software for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $5,600 and $4,800, respectively. Depreciation expense on
capitalized software for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 was approximately $15,900 and $13,300, respectively.
With the exception of the net assets of the NRB operations, there were no assets held for sale at
September 30, 2009. Assets held for sale were $7,020 at December 31, 2008 and primarily consisted
of three buildings comprising the Companys former office complex in Torrington, Connecticut. In
January 2009, the Company sold one of these buildings and
recognized a pretax gain of $1,322. During the second quarter of
2009, in anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record
upon completion of the sale of the remaining buildings comprising
the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$6,376. The Company finalized the sale of these remaining buildings on
July 20, 2009 and recognized an additional loss of $689.
On February 15, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its former seamless steel tube
manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately $28,400. The Company
recognized a pretax gain of approximately $20,200 during the first quarter of 2008 and recorded the
gain in Other income (expense), net in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Income.
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Other |
|
Ending Balance |
|
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
49,810 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
49,888 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
161,990 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
162,696 |
|
Steel |
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,641 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,435 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
$ |
222,225 |
|
|
Acquisitions represent opening balance sheet allocation adjustments for acquisitions completed in
2008. Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.
7
Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
The following table displays intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
79,139 |
|
|
$ |
13,353 |
|
|
$ |
65,786 |
|
|
$ |
79,139 |
|
|
$ |
10,020 |
|
|
$ |
69,119 |
|
Engineering drawings |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Know-how |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
Patents |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
Technology use |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
3,471 |
|
|
|
31,529 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
32,952 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
PMA licenses |
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
7,039 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
Unpatented technology |
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
156,334 |
|
|
$ |
38,481 |
|
|
$ |
117,853 |
|
|
$ |
155,513 |
|
|
$ |
31,345 |
|
|
$ |
124,168 |
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
222,225 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
222,225 |
|
|
$ |
221,435 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,435 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
Land-use rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
Industrial license agreements |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964 |
|
FAA air agency certificates |
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
238,809 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
238,809 |
|
|
$ |
238,165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
238,165 |
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
395,143 |
|
|
$ |
38,481 |
|
|
$ |
356,662 |
|
|
$ |
393,678 |
|
|
$ |
31,345 |
|
|
$ |
362,333 |
|
|
Amortization
expense for intangible assets for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
was $3,153 and $3,483, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $10,101 and $10,256, respectively. Amortization expense for
intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $13,400 for 2009; $11,400 in 2010; $11,000 in
2011; $10,600 in 2012 and $8,100 in 2013.
Note 6 Equity Investments
The Companys investments in less than majority-owned companies in which it has the ability to
exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method except when they qualify
as variable interest entities and are consolidated.
Equity investments are reviewed for impairment when circumstances (such as lower-than-expected
financial performance or change in strategic direction) indicate that the carrying value of the
investment may not be recoverable. If impairment does exist, the equity investment is written down
to its fair value with a corresponding charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income. An
impairment charge of $1,346 was recorded during the third quarter of 2009 relating to the Companys
equity investment in Endorsia.com International AB.
Investments accounted for under the equity method were $12,943 and $13,634 at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively, and were reported in Other non-current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
8
Note 6 Equity Investments (continued)
The Companys Mobile Industries segment has a joint venture with Advanced Green Components, LLC
(AGC). AGC is engaged in the business of converting steel to machined rings for tapered bearings
and other related products. During the third quarter of 2006, AGC refinanced its long-term debt of
$12,240. The Company guaranteed half of this obligation. The Company concluded the refinancing
represented a reconsideration event to evaluate whether AGC was a variable interest entity. The
Company concluded that AGC was a variable interest entity and that the Company was the primary
beneficiary. Therefore, the Company consolidated AGC, effective September 30, 2006. At September
30, 2009, net assets of AGC were $910, primarily consisting of the following: inventory of $5,397;
property, plant and equipment of $20,691; short-term and long-term debt of $18,050; and other
non-current liabilities of $7,365. All of AGCs assets are collateral for its obligations. Except
for AGCs indebtedness for which the Company is a guarantor, AGCs creditors have no recourse to
the general credit of the Company.
The Company has no other variable interest entities, other than AGC, for which it is a primary
beneficiary.
Note 7 Financing Arrangements
Short-term debt at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries
with various banks with interest rates ranging from 0.85% to 10.50% |
|
$ |
63,323 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
63,323 |
|
|
$ |
91,482 |
|
|
The lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings
up to $383,325. At September 30, 2009, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $63,323, which
reduced the availability under these facilities to $320,002.
The Company has a $175,000 Accounts Receivable Securitization Financing Agreement (Asset
Securitization Agreement), renewable every 364 days. Under the terms of the Asset Securitization
Agreement, which expires on December 18, 2009, the Company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain
domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary that in turn uses the trade receivables to secure borrowings, which are funded through a
vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term market. Borrowings under the agreement are
limited to certain borrowing base calculations. Any amounts outstanding under this Asset
Securitization Agreement would be reported on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet in
Short-term debt. As of September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Asset
Securitization Agreement. Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset
Securitization Agreement as of September 30, 2009, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the
availability under the Asset Securitization Agreement to $75,647. The yield on the commercial
paper, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a financing cost and is
included in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
9
Note 7 Financing Arrangements (continued)
Long-term debt at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through
May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76% |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 15, 2014,
with an interest rate of 6.0% |
|
|
249,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development
Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025
(0.34% at September 30, 2009) |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025
(1.59% at September 30, 2009) |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
|
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding
Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.99% at September 30, 2009) |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Variable-rate
Unsecured Canadian Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,104 |
|
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, maturing on February 15, 2010
with an interest rate of 5.75% |
|
|
250,993 |
|
|
|
252,357 |
|
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC,
maturing on July 17, 2010 (2.32% at September 30, 2009) |
|
|
12,240 |
|
|
|
12,240 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,003 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
737,594 |
|
|
|
532,358 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
268,537 |
|
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
469,057 |
|
|
$ |
515,250 |
|
|
On September 9, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of $250,000 of fixed-rate 6.0%
unsecured Senior Notes, due in 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes will be used for
the repayment of the Companys fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes maturing on February 15,
2010.
On
July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500,000 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
(new Senior Credit Facility). At September 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings
under its new Senior Credit Facility but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $35,543, which
reduced the availability under the new Senior Credit Facility to $464,457. This new Senior Credit
Facility matures on July 10, 2012. Under the new Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three
financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a
consolidated minimum tangible net worth test. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in full
compliance with the covenants under the new Senior Credit Facility.
In December 2005, the Company entered into an unsecured loan in Canada. The Company repaid a
portion of this loan in June 2009 and repaid the remaining balance on July 10, 2009.
The Company is the guarantor of $6,120 of AGCs $12,240 credit facility. Refer to Note 6 Equity
Investments for additional discussion. Effective as of July 17, 2009, AGC renewed its $12,240
credit facility with US Bank for another 365 days. The Company continues to guarantee half of this
obligation.
10
Note 8 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues
liabilities for warranty based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim
experience in accordance with accounting rules for contingencies established by the FASB. Should
the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and
reasonably estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are
made quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical experience change. The following is a
rollforward of the warranty accruals for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the twelve
months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
13,515 |
|
|
$ |
12,571 |
|
Expense |
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(9,209 |
) |
|
|
(6,581 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
8,228 |
|
|
$ |
13,515 |
|
|
The product warranty accrual at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was included in Accounts
payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Note 9 Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Invested |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
in the |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,663,038 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
838,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,580,084 |
|
|
$ |
(819,633 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,586 |
) |
|
$ |
22,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(118,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
54,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement liability
adjustment
(net of income tax of $12,949) |
|
|
18,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
(net of income tax of $41) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
(46,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital investment of Timken XEMC (Hunan)
Bearings Co. |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(763 |
) |
Dividends $0.36 per share |
|
|
(34,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 170,757 shares from treasury
and 128,853 shares from authorized |
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,590,973 |
|
|
$ |
53,064 |
|
|
$ |
839,719 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,701 |
|
|
$ |
(747,157 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,493 |
) |
|
$ |
18,139 |
|
|
The total comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $5,663. The total comprehensive income
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $41,558 and $272,002, respectively.
11
Note 10 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic
earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Timken Company |
|
$ |
(19,325 |
) |
|
$ |
123,874 |
|
|
$ |
(53,863 |
) |
|
$ |
277,722 |
|
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings
allocated to nonvested stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders for basic earnings per
share and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
(19,325 |
) |
|
$ |
123,041 |
|
|
$ |
(53,863 |
) |
|
$ |
275,820 |
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic |
|
|
96,176,091 |
|
|
|
95,878,978 |
|
|
|
96,111,847 |
|
|
|
95,574,420 |
|
Effect of dilutive options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,239 |
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding,
assuming dilution of stock options |
|
|
96,176,091 |
|
|
|
96,103,130 |
|
|
|
96,111,847 |
|
|
|
95,968,659 |
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
In periods in which a net loss has occurred, as is the case for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the dilutive effect of stock options is not recognized and thus is not utilized
in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share.
The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average
market price of the Companys common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options
outstanding were 40,350 and 536,456, respectively, for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
12
Note 11 Segment Information
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment
is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S.
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of
subsidiaries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
327,572 |
|
|
$ |
426,489 |
|
|
$ |
920,385 |
|
|
$ |
1,397,565 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
186,392 |
|
|
|
316,904 |
|
|
|
616,884 |
|
|
|
895,622 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
100,272 |
|
|
|
104,711 |
|
|
|
318,767 |
|
|
|
302,208 |
|
Steel |
|
|
149,408 |
|
|
|
488,248 |
|
|
|
510,985 |
|
|
|
1,347,453 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
763,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,352 |
|
|
$ |
2,367,021 |
|
|
$ |
3,942,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries |
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
972 |
|
|
$ |
2,199 |
|
|
$ |
2,252 |
|
Steel |
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
48,291 |
|
|
|
30,365 |
|
|
|
133,002 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,116 |
|
|
$ |
49,263 |
|
|
$ |
32,564 |
|
|
$ |
135,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment EBIT, as adjusted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
13,745 |
|
|
$ |
8,684 |
|
|
$ |
(601 |
) |
|
$ |
43,387 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
16,081 |
|
|
|
73,296 |
|
|
|
94,626 |
|
|
|
180,929 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
19,114 |
|
|
|
9,819 |
|
|
|
55,955 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
Steel |
|
|
(20,266 |
) |
|
|
133,802 |
|
|
|
(60,435 |
) |
|
|
267,499 |
|
|
Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments |
|
|
28,674 |
|
|
|
225,601 |
|
|
|
89,545 |
|
|
|
515,851 |
|
|
Unallocated corporate expense |
|
|
(10,310 |
) |
|
|
(19,024 |
) |
|
|
(35,802 |
) |
|
|
(54,724 |
) |
Impairment and restructuring |
|
|
(19,613 |
) |
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
(84,074 |
) |
|
|
(7,442 |
) |
Rationalization and integration charges |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(5,228 |
) |
|
|
(3,447 |
) |
(Loss) gain on sale of non-strategic assets, net of dissolution of subsidiary |
|
|
(2,587 |
) |
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
19,987 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,319 |
) |
|
|
(11,003 |
) |
|
|
(27,188 |
) |
|
|
(33,375 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
4,294 |
|
Intersegment eliminations |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
6,261 |
|
|
|
(5,384 |
) |
|
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations
before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
(11,785 |
) |
|
$ |
193,092 |
|
|
$ |
(55,840 |
) |
|
$ |
435,760 |
|
|
Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments. These sales are eliminated upon
consolidation.
The following table
presents assets employed by segment for the periods ended September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
1,575,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,299,095 |
|
Process Industries |
|
|
824,591 |
|
|
|
885,689 |
|
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
541,019 |
|
|
|
606,753 |
|
Steel |
|
|
951,254 |
|
|
|
1,078,597 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
201,468 |
|
|
|
213,430 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,093,527 |
|
|
$ |
4,083,564 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
364,494 |
|
|
|
452,486 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,458,021 |
|
|
$ |
4,536,050 |
|
|
13
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges
Impairment and restructuring charges by segment are comprised of the following:
For the three months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
6,477 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
18,807 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,936 |
|
|
$ |
6,718 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
19,613 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
29,847 |
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,796 |
|
Severance expense
and related benefit
costs |
|
|
27,467 |
|
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
2,055 |
|
|
|
46,311 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,791 |
|
|
$ |
42,773 |
|
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
$ |
3,224 |
|
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
|
$ |
84,074 |
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
Process |
|
Aerospace and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industries |
|
Industries |
|
Defense |
|
Steel |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Severance expense and related benefit costs |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
Exit costs |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,442 |
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for
the periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all
amounts in the tables above.
14
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
Selling and Administrative Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company initially targeted pretax savings
of approximately $30,000 to $40,000 in annual selling and administrative costs. In April 2009, in
light of the Companys revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and earnings for the
year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80,000. The implementation of these
savings began in the first quarter of 2009 and is expected to be significantly completed by the end
of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected to be achieved in 2010. As the
Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut its sales and administrative
associate workforce by up to 400 positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of approximately
$15,000 to $20,000. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recognized $10,613 of
severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative eliminating approximately 270
associates. Of the $10,613 charge for the first nine months of 2009, $4,524 related to the Mobile
Industries segment, $1,944 related to the Process Industries segment, $552 related to the Aerospace
and Defense segment, $1,538 related to the Steel segment and $2,055 related to Corporate.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded $13,555 and $28,819,
respectively, in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits
of $1,611 for the first nine months of 2009, to eliminate approximately 3,000 associates to
properly align its business as a result of the current downturn in the economy and expected market
demand. Of the $13,555 charge, $10,268 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $2,304 related to
the Process Industries segment and $983 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. Of the
$28,819 charge, $20,603 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $4,836 related to the Process
Industries segment, $1,695 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1,685 related to the
Steel segment.
Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization
In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the
first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel
Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group
includes three reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of approximately $18,000 in 2008 as a result of these
changes. During the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $1,948 of severance and
related benefit costs related to this initiative.
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6,376 during the second quarter
of 2009.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an additional
loss of $689 in Other (expense) income, net on the sale of the remaining portion of this office complex.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the planned closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao
Paulo, Brazil. The closure of this manufacturing facility was subsequently delayed to serve higher
customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will
close this facility before the end of 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax
savings of approximately $5,000, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25,000 to $30,000,
which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and
selling, administrative and general expenses. Due to the delay in the closure of this
manufacturing facility, the Company expects to realize the $5,000 of annual pretax savings by
the end of 2010, once this facility closes. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs
of approximately $21,978 as of September 30, 2009 related to this closure. During the third
quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded $1,322 and $2,520, respectively, of
severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $699 and $1,467, respectively, associated
with the planned closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility. During the
third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $611 and $1,613, respectively, of
severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $807 associated with the planned closure of
the Companys San Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility.
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $897 during the first quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed
assets at one of its facilities in France as a result of the carrying value of these assets
exceeding expected future cash flows.
15
Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $35,000 through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $70,000 to $80,000 (including pretax cash costs of
approximately $45,000 to $50,000), by the end of 2009.
The Company recorded exit costs of $241 during the third quarter of 2009 related to Process
Industries rationalization plans. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $27,651 and exit costs of $1,607. During the third quarter and first nine
months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $190 and $1,621, respectively, as a result of
Process Industries rationalization plans. The significant impairment charge recorded during the
first nine months of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors served by
one of the rationalized plants, resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for this plant
exceeding its estimated future cash flows and being written down to their fair value. The Company
now expects to close this facility by the end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred
cumulative pretax costs of approximately $67,973 (including approximately $25,300 of pretax cash
costs) through September 30, 2009 for these rationalization plans including rationalization costs
recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. The Process
Industries segment has realized approximately $15,000 in annual pretax savings through September
30, 2009 as a result of these actions.
In October 2009, the Company announced the consolidation of its distribution
centers in Bucyrus,
Ohio and Spartanburg, South Carolina into a larger, leased facility in the region near the existing
Spartanburg location. The closure of the Bucyrus Distribution Center will displace approximately
290 associates. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $4,482 of severance and
related benefit costs related to this closure.
Steel
In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility
located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $389 of exit costs during the first nine months
of 2008 related to this action.
The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
|
$ |
19,062 |
|
Expense |
|
|
47,667 |
|
|
|
12,709 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(29,775 |
) |
|
|
(14,750 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
34,913 |
|
|
$ |
17,021 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is included in Accounts
payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at
September 30, 2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $1,611.
The accrual at September 30, 2009 includes $27,481 of severance and related benefits, with the
remainder of the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the
$27,481 accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of
2010. In addition to the restructuring accrual presented above, the Company has $1,846 of
restructuring accruals at September 30, 2009 related to the NRB operations that will be retained by
the Company. The expense related to these retained restructuring accruals has been reclassified to discontinued operations.
16
Note 13 Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys retirement and
postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
are based on actuarial calculations prepared during 2008. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 is the Companys best estimate of each periods proportionate share
of the amounts to be recorded for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9,645 |
|
|
$ |
9,010 |
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
39,459 |
|
|
|
39,793 |
|
|
|
9,721 |
|
|
|
9,794 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(48,526 |
) |
|
|
(50,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
8,984 |
|
|
|
7,247 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
15,230 |
|
|
$ |
8,916 |
|
|
$ |
14,149 |
|
|
$ |
10,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
28,829 |
|
|
$ |
27,107 |
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
$ |
2,344 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
117,605 |
|
|
|
120,047 |
|
|
|
29,162 |
|
|
|
30,511 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(144,771 |
) |
|
|
(151,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
8,615 |
|
|
|
9,443 |
|
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
(1,633 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
26,806 |
|
|
|
21,801 |
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
41,442 |
|
|
$ |
26,838 |
|
|
$ |
35,650 |
|
|
$ |
35,504 |
|
|
The net periodic benefit for defined benefit pension and postretirement plans retained by NRB are
classified as discontinued operations. As a result of the pending
sale of the NRB operations, the Company recognized a
pretax curtailment loss of $2,811 for the pension benefit obligations and $3,399 for postretirement
benefit obligations.
Note 14 Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
7,116 |
|
|
$ |
68,121 |
|
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
|
$ |
155,078 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(60.4 |
)% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
The Companys provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed in accordance with
interim period income tax accounting rules by applying the appropriate annual effective tax rates
to income or loss before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete
items, including interest on prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the period in which
they occur.
17
Note 14 Income Taxes (continued)
The effective tax rates on the pretax losses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009
were unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to losses at certain
foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, as well as the net impact of discrete
tax adjustments recorded during the periods. These items were partially offset by the earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35% and the net effect of
other U.S. tax items. Application of interim period income tax accounting rules has caused
significant volatility in the 2009 quarterly effective tax rates. For the full year of 2009, the
Company expects its effective tax rate to be in the range of 25% to 30%.
In the first nine months of 2009, the Companys unrecognized tax benefits increased by $5,200.
This increase represents an increase of $14,200 for tax positions related to prior years, offset by
a decrease of $9,000 related to lapses in statutes of limitation. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company had approximately $76,900 of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included in this
amount is approximately $38,200, which represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that
would favorably impact the Companys effective income tax rate in any future periods if such
benefits were recognized.
Note 15 Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). The FASB provides accounting rules that classify the inputs used to measure fair value
into the following hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
7,654 |
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges |
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
The Company uses publicly available foreign currency forward and spot rates to measure the fair
value of its foreign currency forward contracts. The Companys interest rate swaps are remeasured
each period using observable market interest rates.
The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of risk associated with the
counterparts to its financial instruments.
18
Note 15 Fair Value (continued)
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at September 30, 2009 |
|
Total Gains |
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held for sale |
|
$ |
301,033 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
301,033 |
|
|
$ |
(38,087 |
) |
Long-lived assets held and used |
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
(32,515 |
) |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
304,570 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
304,570 |
|
|
$ |
(70,602 |
) |
|
The following table presents the long-lived assets that have been adjusted to their fair value
in the first nine months of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Value |
|
Adjustment |
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Long-lived assets held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of the NRB operations |
|
$ |
334,728 |
|
|
$ |
(33,695 |
) |
|
$ |
301,033 |
|
Torrington campus office complex |
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
|
(4,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets held for sale: |
|
$ |
339,120 |
|
|
$ |
(38,087 |
) |
|
$ |
301,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held and used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Industries facilities |
|
$ |
29,815 |
|
|
$ |
(27,652 |
) |
|
$ |
2,163 |
|
Torrington campus office complex |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
(1,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Endorsia.com International AB |
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
374 |
|
|
Total long-lived assets held and used: |
|
$ |
36,052 |
|
|
$ |
(32,515 |
) |
|
$ |
3,537 |
|
|
In the first nine months of 2009, assets held for sale of $339,120 and assets held and used of
$36,052 were written down to their fair value of $304,570 and impairment charges of $70,602 were
included in earnings. During the third quarter, the net assets associated with the pending sale of
the NRB business were reclassified to assets held for sale and adjusted for impairment and written
down to their fair value of $301,033. In addition, the Companys equity investment in Endorsia.com
International AB was adjusted for impairment and written down to its fair value of $1,000.
Assets held for sale of $4,392 and assets held and used of $1,984, associated with the Companys
former Torrington campus office complex, were written down to zero and an impairment charge was
recognized for the full amount. The Company recognized an impairment charge during the second
quarter in anticipation of recognizing a loss on the sale of these assets sold on July 20, 2009.
The Company subsequently sold the assets for a loss of $689.
Assets held and used associated with the rationalization of the Process Industries three Canton,
Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities, with a carrying value of $29,815, were written down to their
fair value of $2,163, resulting in an impairment charge of $27,652, which was included in earnings
for the first nine months of 2009. In addition to the Torrington campus office complex and the
rationalization of Process Industries facilities, a portion of assets held and used that were part
of a larger group of assets and had a total carrying value of $1,907 were found to be impaired
during the first nine months of 2009, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,533. A portion of
these assets, with a carrying value of $128, were scrapped and written down to zero, while the
remaining assets of $1,779 were written down to their fair value of $374.
With the exception of the assets held and used associated with the Torrington campus office
complex, the estimated fair value was based on what the Company would receive for used machinery
and equipment, if sold. Of the total impairment charge of $70,601 recognized in earnings during
the first nine months of 2009, $3,923 was recognized in the first quarter of 2009, $31,707 was
recognized in the second quarter of 2009 and $34,971 was recognized in the third quarter of 2009.
The
Company has adopted the revisions to the FASBs accounting rules regarding financial
instruments. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, commercial
paper, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due
to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys long-term fixed-rate
debt, based on quoted market prices, was $447,780 and $339,640 at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively. The carrying value of this debt at such dates was $429,930 and $429,000
respectively.
19
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange
rate risk, and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on various commodities are entered into to
manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas used in the Companys
manufacturing process. Forward contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage
the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted revenue denominated in foreign currencies.
Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage the
foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of the Companys commitments
denominated in foreign currencies. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate
risk associated with the Companys fixed and floating-rate borrowings.
The Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted
revenues, and certain interest rate hedges as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings. The
majority of the Companys natural gas forward contracts are not subject to any hedge designation as
they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $208,204 of outstanding foreign currency forward
contracts at notional value. The total notional value of foreign currency hedges as of December
31, 2008 was $239,415.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e.,
hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which
the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in
excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if
any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the current period.
To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting
from export sales over the next year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow
hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted intra-group revenue or expense
denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens significantly
against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue
is offset by gains in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely,
when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is
offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the
exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof
that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well
as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized
in the same line item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in interest expense when the hedged
item is fixed-rate debt).
20
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
The following table presents the fair value and location of all assets and liabilities associated
with the Companys hedging instruments within the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
at 9/30/09 |
|
at 12/31/08 |
|
at 9/30/09 |
|
at 12/31/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
4,398 |
|
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
2,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
|
$ |
8,314 |
|
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other non-current assets/liabilities |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
10,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,159 |
|
|
$ |
10,853 |
|
|
The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the
unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income |
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on derivative |
|
income on derivative |
|
|
Location of gain or |
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
Derivatives in fair value |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
hedging relationships |
|
income on derivative |
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(776 |
) |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
(1,364 |
) |
|
$ |
232 |
|
Natural gas forward contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(776 |
) |
|
$ |
(424 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,923 |
) |
|
$ |
(843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income |
|
recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on derivative |
|
income on derivative |
Hedged items in |
|
Location of gain or |
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
fair value hedge |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
relationships |
|
income on derivative |
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate debt |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
(232 |
) |
Natural gas |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
2,549 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
21
Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
(loss) reclassified from |
|
|
recognized in OCI on |
|
AOCI into income |
|
|
derivative |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
(4,613 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
(4,613 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
reclassified from AOCI |
|
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
into income (effective |
|
|
OCI on derivative |
|
portion) |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
(4,761 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,670 |
) |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
(4,761 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,670 |
) |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
Amount of gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized in income on |
|
recognized in income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative |
|
derivative |
Derivatives not |
|
Location of gain or |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
designated as |
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
hedging instruments |
|
income on derivative |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
forward contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Foreign currency
forward contracts |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(4,405 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
924 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,385 |
) |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
(1,783 |
) |
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
22
Note 17 Prior Period Adjustments
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded two adjustments related to its 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements. In the first quarter of 2009, Net income (loss) attributable to
noncontrolling interest increased by $6,100 (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to
the $48,765 goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the
Mobile Industries segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of
2008, the Company did not fully recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to
two separate subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership.
In
addition, (Loss) Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes decreased by $3,400 ($2,044 after-tax) due to a
correction of an error related to $3,400 of in-process research and development costs that were
recorded in Other current assets with the anticipation of being paid for by a third-party.
However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be substantiated through a
contract with a third-party.
As a result of these errors, the Companys 2008 results were understated by $4,056, and the
Companys first quarter 2009 results were overstated by the same amount. Management of the Company
concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustments was immaterial to the Companys 2008 and
first quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the projected full-year 2009 financial
statements.
Note 18 Divestitures
On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its
NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction, which is expected to occur
by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of
other closing conditions, the Company will receive approximately $330,000 in cash proceeds for
these operations (including certain receivables to be retained by the Company), subject to working
capital adjustments. The NRB operations primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market
sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of
radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles, for
automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in the United States,
Canada, Europe and China. The NRB operations had 2008 sales of approximately $620,000 and were
previously included in the Companys Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and
Defense reportable segments. The Mobile Industries segment accounted for approximately 80% of the
2008 sales of the NRB operations.
The results of operations were reclassified as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of
2009 as the NRB operations met all the criteria for discontinued operations, including assets held
for sale. Previous results for 2009 and 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation
under Discontinued Operations. The Company incurred a pretax impairment loss of $33,695 during
the third quarter of 2009 as the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations were lower than
the net book value of the net assets expected to be transferred as a result of sale of the NRB
operations to JTEKT Corporation.
The following results of operations for this business have been treated as discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
103,025 |
|
|
$ |
146,332 |
|
|
$ |
288,953 |
|
|
$ |
510,055 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
13,112 |
|
|
|
25,215 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
88,005 |
|
Impairment and restructuring charges |
|
|
48,592 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
53,790 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(30,803 |
) |
|
$ |
6,539 |
|
|
$ |
(59,912 |
) |
|
$ |
26,099 |
|
|
23
Note 18 Divestitures (continued)
The following presentation shows the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
25,799 |
|
|
$ |
33,482 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
114,827 |
|
|
|
145,201 |
|
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
193,263 |
|
|
|
226,895 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,614 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
26,638 |
|
|
|
32,806 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
Total assets, discontinued operations |
|
$ |
364,494 |
|
|
$ |
452,486 |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
16,757 |
|
|
$ |
19,907 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
15,790 |
|
|
|
14,026 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,986 |
|
|
Total liabilities, discontinued operations |
|
$ |
44,181 |
|
|
$ |
45,372 |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income related to the net assets of the NRB operations included
in the Companys Equity at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $19,280 and $9,944,
respectively. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income was factored in
when the Company recorded the impairment loss of $33,695.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
Introduction
The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and
assemblies, high-quality alloy steels and aerospace power transmission systems, as well as a
provider of related products and services. The Company operates under two business groups: the
Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission
Group is composed of three operating segments: (1) Mobile Industries, (2) Process Industries and
(3) Aerospace and Defense. These three operating segments and the Steel Group comprise the
Companys four reportable segments.
The Mobile Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products
and services. Customers of the Mobile Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers
and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, medium and heavy-duty trucks, rail cars,
locomotives and agricultural, construction and mining equipment. Customers also include
aftermarket distributors of automotive products. The Companys strategy for the Mobile Industries
segment is to improve financial performance by allocating assets to serve the most attractive
market sectors and restructuring or exiting those businesses where adequate returns cannot be
achieved over the long-term.
The Process Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related
products and services. Customers of the Process Industries segment include original equipment
manufacturers of power transmission, energy and heavy industries machinery and equipment, including
rolling mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses,
cranes, hoists, drawbridges, wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors
and crushers and food processing equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of
products other than those for steel and automotive applications. The Companys strategy for the
Process Industries segment is to pursue growth in selected industrial market sectors and in the
aftermarket and to achieve a leadership position in Asia. In December 2007, the Company announced
the establishment of a joint venture, Timken XEMC (Hunan) Bearings Co., Ltd., to manufacture
ultra-large-bore bearings for the growing Chinese wind energy market. In October 2008, the joint
venture broke ground on a new wind energy plant to be built in China. Bearings produced at this
facility are expected to be available in 2010. In October 2008, the Company announced that it
would expand production at its Tyger River facility in Union, South Carolina to make
ultra-large-bore bearings to serve wind-turbine manufacturers in North America.
The Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor
head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears and other precision flight-critical components
for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace and Defense segment also provides
aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as
well as aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. In addition, the Aerospace and
Defense segment manufactures bearings for original equipment manufacturers of health and
positioning control equipment. The Companys strategy for the Aerospace and Defense segment is to:
(1) grow by adding power transmission parts, assemblies and services, utilizing a platform
approach; (2) develop new aftermarket channels; and (3) add core bearing capacity through
manufacturing initiatives in North America and China. In November 2008, the Company completed the
acquisition of the assets of EXTEX Ltd. (EXTEX), located in Gilbert, Arizona. EXTEX is a leading
designer and marketer of high-quality replacement engine parts for the aerospace aftermarket.
The Steel segment manufactures more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy steel, which are produced
in both solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The Steel segment also
manufactures custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications. The
Companys strategy for the Steel segment is to focus on opportunities where the Company can offer
differentiated capabilities while driving profitable growth. In November 2008, the Company opened
a new small-bar steel rolling mill to expand its portfolio of differentiated steel products. The
new mill enables the Company to competitively produce steel bars down to 1-inch diameter for use in
power transmission and friction management applications for a variety of customers, including
foreign automakers. In February 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of
Boring Specialties, Inc. (BSI), a provider of a wide range of precision deep-hole oil and gas
drilling and extraction products and services.
In addition to specific segment initiatives, the Company has been making strategic investments in
business processes and systems. Project O.N.E. is a multi-year program, which began in 2005,
designed to improve the Companys business processes and systems. The Company expects to invest
approximately $210 million to $220 million, which includes internal and external costs, to
implement Project O.N.E. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has incurred costs of approximately
$209.1 million, of which approximately $118.8 million have been capitalized to the Consolidated
Balance Sheet. During 2008 and 2007, the Company completed the installation of Project O.N.E. for
the majority of the Companys domestic operations and a major portion of its European operations.
On April 1, 2009, the Company completed the next installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of
the Companys remaining European operations, as well as certain other facilities in North America
and India. With the completion of the April 2009 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 80%
of the Bearings and Power Transmission Groups global sales flow through the new system. The next
installation of Project O.N.E. is expected to be completed in April 2010.
25
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its
Needle Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction,
which is expected to occur by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory approvals and the
satisfaction or waiver of other closing conditions, the Company will receive approximately $330
million in cash proceeds for these operations (including certain receivables to be retained by the
Company), subject to working capital adjustments. The NRB operations manufacture highly engineered
needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings,
as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles, for automotive and industrial applications.
The NRB operations
have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and China. The NRB operations had 2008 sales
of approximately $620 million and were previously included in the Companys Mobile Industries,
Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense reportable segments. The Mobile Industries segment
accounted for approximately 80 percent of the 2008 sales of the NRB operations. The results of
operations were reclassified as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of 2009 as the NRB
operations met all the criteria for discontinued operations, including assets held for sale.
Previous results for 2009 and 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation under
Discontinued Operations. The Company incurred a pretax impairment loss of approximately $33.7
million during the third quarter of 2009 as the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations
were lower than net book value of the net assets expected to be transferred as a result of sale of
the NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. Refer to Note 18 Divestitures in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.
Financial Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
763.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,336.4 |
|
|
$ |
(572.8 |
) |
|
|
(42.9 |
)% |
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
(143.9 |
) |
|
|
(115.1 |
)% |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
|
|
(573.8 |
)% |
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(63.6 |
)% |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
|
|
130.4 |
|
|
|
(180.5 |
) |
|
|
(138.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
(1.48 |
) |
|
|
(115.6 |
)% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
(557.1 |
)% |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
(1.87 |
) |
|
|
(138.7 |
)% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,176,091 |
|
|
|
96,103,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,367.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1,575.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.0 |
)% |
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
280.7 |
|
|
|
(339.5 |
) |
|
|
(120.9 |
)% |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
(86.0 |
) |
|
NM |
(Loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(263.3 |
)% |
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company |
|
|
(113.8 |
) |
|
|
303.8 |
|
|
|
(417.6 |
) |
|
|
(137.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
(3.43 |
) |
|
|
(119.5 |
)% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
(0.89 |
) |
|
|
(329.6 |
)% |
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
$ |
3.14 |
|
|
$ |
(4.32 |
) |
|
|
(137.6 |
)% |
Average number of shares diluted |
|
|
96,111,847 |
|
|
|
95,968,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
Net sales for the third quarter of 2009 were approximately $0.76 billion, compared to $1.34
billion in the third quarter of 2008, a decrease of 42.9%. Net sales for the first nine months of
2009 were approximately $2.37 billion, compared to $3.94 billion in the first nine months of 2008,
a decrease of 40.0%. Sales were lower across all business segments for the third quarter of 2009.
Sales for the first nine months of 2009 were lower across all business segments except for the
Aerospace and Defense segment. The decrease in sales was primarily driven by lower volume and
lower surcharges in the Steel segment, partially offset by the impact of favorable pricing.
The Companys third quarter and first nine months results reflect the deterioration of most
market sectors as a result of the
current global economic downturn. The impact of lower volume and higher restructuring charges, as
a result of actions taken to align the Companys businesses with current demand, was partially
offset by lower raw material costs and lower selling and administrative costs. Additionally, the
Companys results from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2008 reflected a pretax
gain of $20.2 million on the sale of the Companys former seamless steel tube manufacturing
facility located in Desford, England.
26
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Outlook
The Companys outlook for 2009 reflects a deteriorating global economic climate that is expected to
last through the remainder of the year, impacting most of the Companys market sectors. Lower
sales, compared to 2008, are expected in all business segments except for the Aerospace and Defense
segment. A significant portion of the decrease in Steel segment sales is expected to be due to
lower surcharges to recover raw material and energy costs, which were at historically high levels
during the middle of 2008, but declined dramatically towards the end of 2008. The Companys
results will continue to reflect lower margins as a result of the lower volume and surcharges,
partially offset by improved pricing, lower raw material costs and lower selling, administrative
and general expenses. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company announced that it planned to
eliminate approximately 400 sales and administrative salaried positions and implement other cost
savings initiatives that are targeted to save approximately $80 million in annual selling and
administrative expenses.
The Company expects to generate cash from operations for the full year of 2009 as a result of
working capital reductions and lower income taxes, partially offset by higher pension
contributions. In addition, the Company expects to reduce capital expenditures by approximately
50% in 2009, compared to 2008.
The Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
327.6 |
|
|
$ |
426.5 |
|
|
$ |
(98.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
)% |
Process Industries |
|
|
186.4 |
|
|
|
316.9 |
|
|
|
(130.5 |
) |
|
|
(41.2 |
)% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
Steel |
|
|
149.4 |
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
|
|
(338.9 |
) |
|
|
(69.4 |
)% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
763.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,336.4 |
|
|
$ |
(572.8 |
) |
|
|
(42.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Industries |
|
$ |
920.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,397.6 |
|
|
$ |
(477.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.1 |
)% |
Process Industries |
|
|
616.9 |
|
|
|
895.6 |
|
|
|
(278.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
Aerospace and Defense |
|
|
318.7 |
|
|
|
302.2 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Steel |
|
|
511.0 |
|
|
|
1,347.4 |
|
|
|
(836.4 |
) |
|
|
(62.1 |
)% |
|
Total Company |
|
$ |
2,367.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1,575.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.0 |
)% |
|
Net sales for the third quarter of 2009 decreased $572.8 million, or 42.9%, compared to the third
quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $420 million across all business
segments, lower surcharges in the Steel segment of approximately $215 million and the effect of
foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately $15 million, partially offset by improved
pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $55 million.
Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 decreased $1.58 billion, or 40.0%, compared to the
first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $1.2 billion across all
business segments, except for the Aerospace and Defense segment, lower surcharges in the Steel
segment of approximately $475 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of
approximately $145 million. These decreases were partially offset by improved pricing and
favorable sales mix of approximately $180 million.
27
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
381.5 |
|
|
$ |
(251.9 |
) |
|
|
(66.0 |
)% |
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,160 |
) bps |
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
409.5 |
|
|
$ |
974.0 |
|
|
$ |
(564.5 |
) |
|
|
(58.0 |
)% |
Gross profit % to net sales |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) bps |
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Gross profit decreased in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, due to
the impact of lower sales volume across most market sectors of approximately $190 million, lower
surcharges in the Steel segment of $215 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately $50
million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $195 million, improved
pricing and sales mix of approximately $20 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $30
million. The higher manufacturing costs were primarily driven by the Mobile Industries and Steel
segments as a result of the underutilization of plant capacity. The lower raw material costs are
primarily due to lower scrap steel costs as scrap steel and other raw material costs have fallen in
2009 from historically high levels in 2008.
Gross profit decreased in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008,
due to the impact of lower sales volume across most market sectors of approximately $445 million,
lower surcharges in the Steel segment of $475 million and higher manufacturing costs of
approximately $250 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $400
million, improved pricing and sales mix of approximately $145 million and lower logistics costs of
approximately $85 million.
In the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009, rationalization expenses included in cost
of products sold primarily related to the continued rationalization of Process Industries Canton,
Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2008,
rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold primarily related to certain Mobile
Industries domestic manufacturing facilities, the closure of the Companys seamless steel tube
manufacturing operations located in Desford, England and the continued rationalization of Process
Industries Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. Rationalization expenses in the
respective periods of 2009 and 2008 primarily consisted of accelerated depreciation and relocation
of equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Administrative and General Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
107.2 |
|
|
$ |
176.5 |
|
|
$ |
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
)% |
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative
and general expenses |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
$ |
358.7 |
|
|
$ |
517.6 |
|
|
$ |
(158.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
)% |
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
bps |
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative
and general expenses |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
)% |
|
The decrease in selling, administrative and general expenses in the third quarter of 2009, compared
to the third quarter of 2008, was primarily due to restructuring initiatives and lower
discretionary spending on items such as travel and professional fees of approximately $45 million
and lower performance-based compensation of approximately $20 million. The decrease
in selling, administrative and general expenses in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the
first nine months of 2008, was primarily due to restructuring initiatives and lower discretionary
spending on items such as travel and professional fees of approximately $100 million, lower
performance-based compensation of approximately $40 million and lower bad debt expense of
approximately $15 million.
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
In the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the rationalization expenses included in
selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to exit costs for associates exiting
the Company. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the rationalization expenses
included in selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to the rationalization
of the Process Industries Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs associated with vacating the
Torrington, Connecticut office complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment and Restructuring Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Severance and related benefit costs
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Exit costs
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
Severance and related benefit costs
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
Exit costs
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
76.6 |
|
|
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the
periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts
in the tables above. See Note 12 Impairment and Restructuring for further details by segment.
Selling and Administrative Cost Reductions
In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and
reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company had targeted pretax savings of
approximately $30 million to $40 million in annual selling and administrative costs. In April
2009, in light of the Companys revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and
earnings for the year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80 million. The
implementation of these savings began in the first quarter of 2009 and is expected to be
substantially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected
to be achieved in 2010. As the Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut up
to 400 sales and administrative associate positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of
approximately $15 million to $20 million. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company
recorded $10.6 million of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative to
eliminate approximately 270 associates. Of the $10.6 million charge for the first nine months of
2009, $4.5 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.9 million related to the Process
Industries segment, $0.6 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment, $1.5 million related
to the Steel segment and $2.1 million related to Corporate.
Manufacturing Workforce Reductions
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded $13.6 million and
$28.8 million, respectively, in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of
pension benefits of $1.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, to eliminate approximately
3,000 associates to properly align its business as a result of the current downturn in the economy
and expected market demand. Of the $13.6 million charge, $10.3 million related to the Mobile
Industries segment, $2.3 million related to the Process Industries segment and $1.0 million related
to the Aerospace and Defense segment. Of the $28.8 million charge, $20.6 million related to the
Mobile Industries segment, $4.8 million related to the Process Industries segment, $1.7 million
related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1.7 million related to the Steel segment.
Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization
In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the
first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel
Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission
Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group includes three reportable segments: Mobile
Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of
approximately $18 million in 2008 as a result of these changes. During the first nine months of
2008, the Company recorded $1.9 million of severance and related benefit costs related to this
initiative. The majority of the severance charge related to the Mobile segment.
29
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Torrington Campus
On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office
complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the
sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million during the second
quarter of 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an additional loss of
approximately $0.7 million in Other (expense) income, net on the sale of the remaining portion of
this office complex.
Mobile Industries
In March 2007, the Company announced the planned closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao
Paulo, Brazil. The closure of this manufacturing facility was subsequently delayed to serve higher
customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will
close this facility before the end of 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax
savings of approximately $5 million, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25 million to $30
million, which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products
sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. Due to the delay in the closure of this
manufacturing facility, the Company expects to realize the $5 million of annual pretax savings
before the end of 2010, once this facility closes. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative
pretax costs of approximately $22.0 million as of September 30, 2009 related to this closure.
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded $1.3 million and $2.5
million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $0.7 million and
$1.5 million, respectively, associated with the planned closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil
manufacturing facility. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company
recorded $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and
exit costs of $0.8 million associated with the planned closure of the Companys Sao Paulo, Brazil
manufacturing facility.
In
addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.9 million during
the first nine months of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in
France as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows.
Process Industries
In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize its three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio
within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver
annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million through streamlining operations and workforce
reductions, with expected pretax costs of approximately $70 million to $80 million (including
pretax cash costs of approximately $50 million), by the end of 2009.
The Company recorded exit costs of $0.2 million during the third quarter of 2009 related to Process
Industries rationalization plans. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $27.7 million and exit costs of $1.6 million. During the third quarter and
first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $0.2 million and $1.6 million as a
result of Process Industries rationalization plans. The significant impairment charge recorded
during the first nine months of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors
served by one of the rationalized plants resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for
this plant exceeding their future cash flows. The Company expects to close this facility by the
end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately
$68.0 million (including approximately $25.3 million of pretax cash costs) as of September 30, 2009
for these rationalization plans, including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold
and selling, administrative and general expenses. As of September 30, 2009, the Process Industries
segment has realized approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.
In October 2009, the Company announced the consolidation of its distribution centers in Bucyrus,
Ohio and Spartanburg, South Carolina into a larger, leased facility in the region surrounding the
existing Spartanburg location. The closure of the Bucyrus Distribution Center will displace
approximately 290 employees. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $4.5 million
of severance and related benefit costs related to this closure.
Steel
In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility
located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $0.4 million of exit costs during the first nine
months of 2008 related to this action.
30
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
Expense |
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
The restructuring accrual at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is included in Accounts
payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at
September 30, 2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $1.6
million. The accrual at September 30, 2009 includes $27.5 million of severance and related
benefits, with the remainder of the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The
majority of the $27.5 million accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be
paid by the middle of 2010. In addition to the restructuring accrual presented above, the Company
has approximately $1.8 million of restructuring accruals at September 30, 2009 related to the NRB
operations that will be retained by the Company. The expense related
to these retained restructuring accruals has been reclassified to
discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(69.8 |
)% |
|
Interest expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 decreased compared to the
third quarter and first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower average debt outstanding, which
more than offset the impact of higher borrowing costs. Interest income for the third quarter and
first nine months of 2009 decreased compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to
lower interest rates on invested cash balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) on divestitures of non-strategic assets |
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
NM |
(Loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
)% |
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
(103.4 |
)% |
Gain (loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
120.0 |
% |
Other
income (expense) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
192.9 |
% |
|
Other
(expense) income, net |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(79.1 |
)% |
|
The loss on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the third quarter of 2009 reflects an
impairment loss on the Companys joint venture, Endorsia.com International AB, of $1.3 million and
a loss of $0.7 million on the sale of the remaining portion of the Companys former office complex
located in Torrington, Connecticut. For the first nine months of 2009, this impairment loss is
offset by a gain of $0.6 million on the sale of the Companys former office complex located in
Torrington, Connecticut. The sale of the Torrington office complex occurred in two separate
transactions; one in the first quarter of 2009 resulting in a gain of $1.3 million and the other in
the third quarter of 2009 resulting in the loss of $0.7 million mentioned above. The gain on
divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first nine months of 2008 primarily related to the
sale of the Companys former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford,
England. In February 2008, the Company completed the sale of this facility, resulting in a pretax
gain of approximately $20.4 million.
31
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
For the third quarter of 2009, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $3.1 million
of losses on the disposal of fixed assets, partially offset by
capital gains of $0.4 million on the Companys
available-for-sale investments and $0.4 million of royalty income. For the third quarter of 2008, other (expense) income,
net primarily consisted of $2.8 million of foreign currency exchange gains, offset by $1.2 million
of donations and $1.1 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets. For the first nine months
of 2009, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $6.1 million of foreign currency
exchange gains and royalty income of $1.1 million, partially offset by $4.9 million of losses on
the disposal of fixed assets and $1.7 million of losses from equity investments. For the first
nine months of 2008, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $4.9 million of losses on
the disposal of fixed assets and $3.1 million of donations, partially offset by gains on equity
investments of $1.6 million and $1.2 million of foreign currency exchange gains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
(61.0 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(60.4 |
)% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
155.1 |
|
|
$ |
(152.2 |
) |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 were unfavorable
relative to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to increased losses at certain foreign
subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded.
The effective tax rates on the pretax losses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009
were unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to losses at certain
foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, as well as the net impact of discrete
tax adjustments recorded during the periods. These items were partially offset by the earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35% and the net effect of
other U.S. tax items. Application of interim period income tax accounting rules has caused
significant volatility in the 2009 quarterly effective tax rates. For the full year of 2009, the
Company expects its effective tax rate to be in the range of 25% to 30%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating results, net of tax |
|
$ |
(30.8 |
) |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating results, net of tax |
|
$ |
(59.9 |
) |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
|
(86.0 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
In July 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its NRB
operations to JTEKT Corporation. The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2009, subject
to customer regulatory approvals and the satisfaction and waiver of other closing conditions.
Discontinued operations represent the operating results of this business. In the third quarter of
2009, the results of operations, net of tax, were a loss of $30.8 million, compared to income of
$6.5 million for the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to a deterioration of the markets served
by the NRB operations. The third quarter of 2009 also reflects a pretax impairment loss of $33.7
million and pension curtailment of $6.2 million (a total of $25.1 million after-tax) as a result of
the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations being lower than the net book value of the
net assets expected to be transferred as a result of the sale of the NRB operations to JTEKT
Corporation. The third quarter of 2009 also reflects other pretax severance and related benefit
costs of $8.7 million. For the first nine months of 2009, the results of discontinued operations,
net of tax, were a loss of $59.9 million, compared to income of $26.1 million for the third quarter
of 2009, primarily due to a deterioration of the markets served by the NRB operations and charges
recorded as a result of restructuring initiatives. Including the impairment loss recorded during
the third quarter of 2009, the first nine months of 2009 include pretax impairment losses of $34.5
million, pretax pension curtailments of $6.2 million and other pretax charges related to severance
and related benefits of $13.1 million. Refer to Note 18 Divestitures in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.
32
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(63.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(4.9 |
) |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
NM |
|
On January 1, 2009, the Company implemented new accounting rules related to noncontrolling
interests. The new accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries
held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called minority interests) to be clearly
identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within
equity, but separate from the parents equity. In addition, the new accounting rules require that
net income (loss) attributable to parties other than the Company be separately reported on the
Consolidated Statement of Income. In the third quarter of 2009, the net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest decreased $0.7 million, compared to the third quarter of 2008, as a result
of lower volume for subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. For the
first nine months of 2009, the net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was a loss
of $4.9 million, compared to income of $3.0 million for the first nine months of 2008. In the
first quarter of 2009, net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6.1
million due to a correction of an error related to the $48.8 million goodwill impairment loss the
Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries segment. In recording the
goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company did not fully recognize that a
portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to two separate subsidiaries in which the Company
holds less than 100% ownership. As a result, the Companys 2008 financial statements were
understated by $6.1 million and the Companys first quarter 2009 financial statements were
overstated by $6.1 million. Management concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustment was
not material to the Companys 2008 and first quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the
projected full-year 2009 financial statements.
Business Segments:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is
adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to
certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment
and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses
on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S.
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of
subsidiaries). Refer to Note 11 Segment Information for the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by
segment to consolidated income before income taxes.
On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its NRB
operations to JTEKT Corporation. The financial results for the NRB operations have been
reclassified to Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Segment results for 2009 and
2008 have been reclassified to conform to the discontinued operations presentation.
Mobile Industries Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
327.6 |
|
|
$ |
426.5 |
|
|
$ |
(98.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
920.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,397.6 |
|
|
$ |
(477.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.1 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
43.4 |
|
|
$ |
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(101.4 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) bps |
|
33
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Mobile Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates.
The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to
meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to
period. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as
such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
327.6 |
|
|
$ |
426.5 |
|
|
$ |
(98.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
336.9 |
|
|
$ |
426.5 |
|
|
$ |
(89.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
920.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,397.6 |
|
|
$ |
(477.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.1 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75.7 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
996.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,397.6 |
|
|
$ |
(401.5 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
)% |
|
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 21.0% for the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily due
to lower volume of approximately $110 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable
sales mix of approximately $20 million. The lower volume was seen across all market sectors, led
by a 55% decline in heavy truck demand and a 53% decline in global off-highway demand. Adjusted
EBIT was higher in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily due
to lower selling, administrative and general expense of approximately $35 million, improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $5 million, lower material costs of approximately $20
million and lower logistics costs of approximately $10 million, partially offset by the impact of
underutilization of manufacturing capacity of approximately $35 million and the impact of lower
demand of $30 million. The lower selling, administrative and general expenses reflect actions
taken by management to align business activities with market conditions.
The Mobile Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 28.7% for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $435 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $65 million. The lower volume was seen across all market
sectors, led by a 31% decline in light vehicle demand, a 57% decline in heavy truck demand and a
45% decline in off-highway demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first nine months of 2009
compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to the impact of underutilization of
manufacturing capacity of approximately $140 million and the impact of lower demand of $80 million,
partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $60 million, lower
selling, administrative and general expenses of $85 million and lower logistics costs of
approximately $40 million.
The Mobile Industries segments sales are expected to decrease approximately 20% to 25% in the
fourth quarter of 2009, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, as demand is expected to be down
across all of the Mobile Industries market sectors. These decreases are expected to be partially
offset by improved pricing. In addition, adjusted EBIT for the Mobile Industries segment is
expected to decrease during the fourth quarter of 2009, compared to the same period of the prior
year, as lower demand is partially offset by improved pricing and lower selling, administrative and
general expenses. In reaction to the current and anticipated lower demand, the Mobile Industries
segment reduced total employment levels by approximately 2,900 positions during the first nine
months of 2009. The Company expects to continue to take actions in the Mobile Industries segment
to properly align its business with market demand.
34
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Process Industries Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
187.0 |
|
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
|
$ |
(130.9 |
) |
|
|
(41.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
73.3 |
|
|
$ |
(57.2 |
) |
|
|
(78.0 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
619.1 |
|
|
$ |
897.9 |
|
|
$ |
(278.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
180.9 |
|
|
$ |
(86.3 |
) |
|
|
(47.7 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(480 |
) bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Process Industries segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
currency exchange rates. The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and
the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from
period to period. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are
measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
187.0 |
|
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
|
$ |
(130.9 |
) |
|
|
(41.2 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
191.7 |
|
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
|
$ |
(126.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
619.1 |
|
|
$ |
897.9 |
|
|
$ |
(278.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
Currency |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency |
|
$ |
658.4 |
|
|
$ |
897.9 |
|
|
$ |
(239.5 |
) |
|
|
(26.7 |
)% |
|
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 39.7% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $140 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $15 million. The lower volume was seen across most market
sectors, led by a 72% decline in power transmission and a 50% decline experienced by the Companys
industrial distribution channel. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the impact of lower volumes of approximately $70
million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $10 million.
The Process Industries segments net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes,
decreased 26.7% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year,
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $310 million, partially offset by improved pricing
and favorable sales mix of approximately $65 million. The lower volume was seen across most market
sectors, led by a 60% decline in power transmission, a 44% decline in heavy industry and a 51%
decline experienced by the Companys industrial distribution channel. Adjusted EBIT was lower in
the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to the
impact of lower volumes of approximately $155 million, partially offset by improved pricing and
favorable sales mix of approximately $75 million. The Company expects lower Process Industries
segment sales and adjusted EBIT for the remainder of 2009, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008,
due to significantly reduced demand across most Process Industries market sectors. In reaction to
the current and anticipated lower demand, the Process Industries segment reduced total employment
levels by approximately 1,300 positions during 2009. The Process Industries segments sales are
expected to decrease approximately 30% to 35% during the fourth quarter of 2009 as compared to
fourth quarter of 2008. The Company expects to continue to take actions in the Process Industries
segment to properly align its business with market demand.
35
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Aerospace and Defense Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
|
$ |
104.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
960 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
318.8 |
|
|
$ |
302.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT |
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
|
|
133.3 |
% |
Adjusted EBIT margin |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
970 |
bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Aerospace and Defense segment
operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of
acquisitions made in 2008 and currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency
exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the
percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of EXTEX. Acquisitions in the
current year represent the increase in sales, year over year, for this recent acquisition. The
year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such,
currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
|
$ |
104.7 |
|
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
Acquisitions |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
NM |
Currency |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
97.5 |
|
|
$ |
104.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
318.8 |
|
|
$ |
302.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Acquisitions |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
NM |
Currency |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
313.6 |
|
|
$ |
302.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
currency-rate changes, decreased 6.9% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter
of 2008, as a result of reduced demand across commercial and civil aircraft markets, partially
offset by continued strength of defense markets. Profitability for the third quarter of 2009,
compared to the third quarter of 2008, improved approximately $9 million primarily due to
structural profitability improvements and improved pricing.
The Aerospace and Defense segments net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and
currency-rate changes, increased 3.8% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine
months of 2008, as a result of improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $10
million. Adjusted EBIT for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of
2008, improved primarily due to leveraging these increases in sales with improved manufacturing
performance. The Company expects the Aerospace and Defense segment to see a modest increase in
sales for the full year of 2009, compared to 2008, as a result of the continued integration of the
acquisition of The Purdy Corporation, acquired in October 2007, which has a strong defense-oriented
profile, and the benefits from the inclusion of a full year of sales from the EXTEX acquisition.
The Aerospace and Defense segments adjusted EBIT is expected to improve in 2009 from 2008,
leveraging improved manufacturing performance and the integration of acquisitions. The Aerospace
and Defense segment has reduced employment by approximately 400 associates during 2009 as a result
of profitability improvement initiatives.
36
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Segment: |
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
157.9 |
|
|
$ |
536.5 |
|
|
$ |
(378.6 |
) |
|
|
(70.6 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) |
|
$ |
(20.3 |
) |
|
$ |
133.8 |
|
|
$ |
(154.1 |
) |
|
|
(115.2 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,780 |
) bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
541.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,480.5 |
|
|
$ |
(939.1 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) |
|
$ |
(60.4 |
) |
|
$ |
267.5 |
|
|
$ |
(327.9 |
) |
|
|
(122.6 |
)% |
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin |
|
|
(11.2 |
)% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,930 |
) bps |
|
The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Steel segment operations reported
in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of acquisitions made in
2008 and currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates are
removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net
sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company
completed the acquisition of the assets of BSI. Acquisitions in the current year represent the
increase in sales, year over year, for only the first quarter period for this acquisition. The
year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such,
currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
157.9 |
|
|
$ |
536.5 |
|
|
$ |
(378.6 |
) |
|
|
(70.6 |
)% |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
Currency |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
159.5 |
|
|
$ |
536.5 |
|
|
$ |
(377.0 |
) |
|
|
(70.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales, including intersegment sales |
|
$ |
541.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,480.5 |
|
|
$ |
(939.1 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
)% |
Acquisitions |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
NM |
Currency |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Net sales, excluding the impact of
acquisitions and currency |
|
$ |
539.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,480.5 |
|
|
$ |
(941.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.6 |
)% |
|
The Steel segments net sales for the third quarter of 2009, excluding the effect of acquisitions
and currency-rate changes, decreased 70.3% compared to the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to
lower volume of approximately $165 million across all market sectors and lower surcharges in the
third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Surcharges decreased to $21.0
million in the third quarter of 2009 from $234.4 million in the third quarter of 2008. Surcharges
are a pricing mechanism that the Company uses to recover scrap steel, energy and certain alloy
costs, which are derived from published monthly indices. The average scrap index for the third
quarter of 2009 was $311 per ton compared to $759 per ton for the third quarter of 2008. Steel
shipments for the third quarter of 2009 were 132,306 tons, compared to 281,341 tons for the third
quarter of 2008, a decrease of 53.0%. The Steel segments average selling price, including
surcharges, was $1,194 per ton for the third quarter of 2009, compared to an average selling price
of $1,907 per ton for the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in the average selling prices was
primarily the result of lower surcharges. The lower surcharges were the result of lower prices for
certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, natural gas and molybdenum.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT decreased $154.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, compared
to the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower surcharges of $213 million, the impact of
lower sales volume of approximately $85 million and the impact of the underutilization of capacity
of approximately $15 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $165
million and lower LIFO charges of $14 million. In the third quarter of 2009, the Steel segment
recognized LIFO income of $4 million, compared to LIFO income of $18 million in the third quarter
of 2008. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys
and energy, decreased 77% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior
year to an average cost of $150 per ton.
37
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The Steel segments net sales for the first nine months of 2009, excluding the effects of
acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 63.6% compared to the first nine months of 2008
primarily due to lower volume of approximately $480 million across all market sectors and lower
surcharges in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. Surcharges
decreased to $69.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 from $543.7 million in the first nine
months of 2008. The average scrap index for the first nine months of 2009 was $243 per ton compared to $615
per ton for the first nine months of 2008. Steel shipments for the first nine months of 2009 were
444,411 tons, compared to 919,582 tons for the first nine months of 2008, a decrease of 52%. The
Steel segments average selling price, including surcharges, was $1,218 per ton for the first nine
months of 2009, compared to an average selling price of $1,610 per ton for the first nine months of
2008. The decrease in the average selling prices was primarily the result of lower surcharges.
The lower surcharges were the result of lower prices for certain input raw materials, especially
scrap steel, molybdenum, natural gas and nickel.
The Steel segments adjusted EBIT decreased $327.9 million in the first nine months of 2009,
compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower surcharges of $475 million, the
impact of lower sales volume of approximately $225 million and the impact of the underutilization
of capacity of approximately $90 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of
approximately $365 million and lower LIFO charges of $48 million. In the first nine months of
2009, the Steel segment recognized LIFO income of $20.3 million, compared to LIFO expense of $27.3
million in the first nine months of 2008. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing
process, including scrap steel, alloys and energy, decreased 57% in the first nine months of 2009
compared to the first nine months in the prior year to an average cost of $247 per ton.
The Company expects the Steel segment to see a 50% to 60% decrease in sales for the remainder of
2009, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, due to lower volume and lower average selling prices.
The lower average selling prices are driven by lower surcharges as scrap steel and alloy prices
have fallen substantially from historically high levels in 2008. The Company also expects lower
demand across most market sectors, primarily driven by a 57% decline in energy markets and a 55%
decline in industrial markets. The Company expects the Steel segments adjusted EBIT to be
significantly lower in 2009 primarily due to the lower demand and average selling prices, partially
offset by lower raw material costs and related LIFO income. Scrap, alloy and energy costs are
expected to increase in the near term from current levels as global industrial production improves
and then level off. As a result of lower projected year-end 2009 scrap costs and other raw
material costs, compared to year-end 2008, as well as lower quantities, the Steel segment expects
to recognize approximately $25 million to $30 million in LIFO income for 2009. In light of the
current market demands, the Steel segment reduced total employment levels by approximately 670
positions during the first nine months of 2009. The Company will continue to take actions in the
Steel segment to properly align its business with market demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense: |
|
|
3Q 2009 |
|
3Q 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(45.8 |
)% |
Corporate expense % to net sales |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2009 |
|
YTD 2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expense |
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
|
$ |
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(34.6 |
)% |
Corporate expense % to net sales |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
bps |
|
Corporate expenses decreased for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, compared to the
third quarter and first nine months of 2008, as a result of lower performance-based compensation
and restructuring initiatives.
38
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The Balance Sheet
Total assets as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2009 decreased by $78.3
million from December 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to lower property, plant and
equipment and lower working capital as a result of lower volumes and capital expenditures in 2009,
partially offset by cash proceeds from the issuance of new fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
382.9 |
|
|
$ |
133.4 |
|
|
$ |
249.5 |
|
|
|
187.0 |
% |
Restricted cash |
|
|
248.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248.2 |
|
|
NM |
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
458.4 |
|
|
|
575.9 |
|
|
|
(117.5 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
)% |
Inventories, net |
|
|
716.9 |
|
|
|
1,000.5 |
|
|
|
(283.6 |
) |
|
|
(28.3 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(16.5 |
)% |
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
80.4 |
% |
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
364.5 |
|
|
|
182.9 |
|
|
|
181.6 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
% |
Other current assets |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
2,316.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,033.5 |
|
|
$ |
283.2 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a discussion of the increase in cash and
cash equivalents. Restricted cash represents the net proceeds received from the issuance of $250
million of fixed-rate 6.0% unsecured Senior Notes in September 2009, which will be used to redeem
$250 million of fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes maturing in February 2010. Accounts
receivable, net decreased as a result of the lower sales in the third quarter of 2009, as compared
to the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease in inventories was primarily due to lower volume and
the Companys concerted effort to decrease inventory levels, as well as lower raw material costs,
partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. Other current assets increased
primarily due to current year income taxes receivable, partially offset by the reduction of assets
held for sale as a result of the sale of portions of the Torrington campus. Current assets of
discontinued operations increased due to the reclassification of non-current assets related to NRB
operations to current assets as a result of qualifying as assets held for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Net: |
|
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
3,655.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,592.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Less: allowances for depreciation |
|
|
(2,229.0 |
) |
|
|
(2,075.1 |
) |
|
|
(153.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
)% |
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
$ |
1,426.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,517.0 |
|
|
$ |
(91.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
)% |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment net in the first nine months of 2009 was primarily
due to current-year depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures. In addition, the impact
of asset impairments also reduced property, plant and equipment net in the first nine months of
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
222.2 |
|
|
$ |
221.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
134.4 |
|
|
|
140.9 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
310.9 |
|
|
|
315.0 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
269.6 |
|
|
|
(269.6 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
715.3 |
|
|
$ |
985.6 |
|
|
$ |
(270.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.4 |
)% |
|
The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to amortization expense recognized during
the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in non-current assets is due to the reclassification
of non-current assets related to the NRB operations to current assets, as well as the asset
impairment loss recognized during the third quarter of 2009.
39
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
91.5 |
|
|
$ |
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
)% |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
352.6 |
|
|
|
423.5 |
|
|
|
(70.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
)% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
147.8 |
|
|
|
217.1 |
|
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(31.9 |
)% |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
% |
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
268.6 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
251.5 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
881.5 |
|
|
$ |
798.3 |
|
|
$ |
83.2 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
The decrease in short-term debt was primarily due to lower net borrowings by the Companys foreign
subsidiaries under lines of credit due to lower working capital requirements. The decrease in
accounts payable and other liabilities was primarily due to lower volumes. The decrease in accrued
salaries, wages and benefits was the result of the payout of 2008 performance-based compensation in
the first quarter of 2009 and no accrued performance-based compensation for 2009. The decrease in
income taxes payable was primarily due to income tax payments during the first nine months of 2009
and benefits recognized on the current consolidated pretax loss. The resulting receivable balance
in income taxes payable was reclassified to Other current assets as of September 30, 2009. Current
liabilities of discontinued operations increased due to the reclassification of non-current
liabilities related to NRB operations to current liabilities as a result of qualifying as assets
held for sale. The increase in the current portion of long-term debt was due to the
reclassification of the Companys $250 million 5.75% fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes, which
mature in February 2010, from non-current liabilities to current liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
469.1 |
|
|
$ |
515.3 |
|
|
$ |
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
)% |
Accrued pension cost |
|
|
786.6 |
|
|
|
830.0 |
|
|
|
(43.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
Accrued postretirement benefits cost |
|
|
611.7 |
|
|
|
613.0 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,985.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,074.7 |
|
|
$ |
(89.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
The decrease in long-term debt was primarily due to the payment of the Companys variable-rate
unsecured Canadian note during the first nine months of 2009. In addition, the Company issued $250
million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes that will mature in September 2014. This issuance
was offset in long-term debt by the reclassification of the Companys $250 million fixed-rate
unsecured Senior Notes, which mature in February 2010, to current liabilities. Accrued pension
cost decreased primarily due to pension contributions to the Companys defined benefit pension
plans, partially offset by pension expense. The decrease in non-current liabilities is due to the
reclassification of non-current liabilities related to the NRB operations to current liabilities.
Other non-current liabilities increased due in part to an increase in the Companys accruals for
uncertain tax positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
892.8 |
|
|
$ |
891.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Earnings invested in the business |
|
|
1,431.7 |
|
|
|
1,580.1 |
|
|
|
(148.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
)% |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(747.1 |
) |
|
|
(819.6 |
) |
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
(61.2 |
)% |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
1,591.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,663.1 |
|
|
$ |
(72.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
40
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Earnings invested in the business decreased in the first nine months of 2009 by a net loss of
$113.8 million and dividends declared of $34.6 million. The decrease in accumulated other
comprehensive loss was primarily due to the positive impact of foreign currency translation,
partially offset by the recognition of prior-year service costs and actuarial losses for defined
benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans. The increase in the foreign currency translation
adjustment of $54.3 million was due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other
currencies, such as the Brazilian real, the British pound, the South African rand, the Czech
Republic koruna and the Euro. See Foreign Currency for further discussion regarding the impact
of foreign currency translation. Treasury shares decreased in the first nine months of 2009 as a
result of utilizing these shares for the Companys stock compensation plans. Noncontrolling
interest decreased in the first nine months of 2009 primarily due to net losses attributable to
noncontrolling interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows: |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
424.3 |
|
|
$ |
308.8 |
|
|
$ |
115.5 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(75.6 |
) |
|
|
(209.4 |
) |
|
|
133.8 |
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(118.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(105.8 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
249.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
177.3 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $308.8 million for the first nine months
of 2008 to $424.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 as the result of higher cash provided
by working capital items, particularly inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by
lower net income adjusted for impairment charges, higher defined benefit pension plan contributions
and lower cash provided from discontinued operations. Inventories provided cash of $311.5 million
in the first nine months of 2009 after using cash of $213.4 million in the first nine months of
2008. Accounts receivable provided cash of $128.4 million in the first nine months of 2009 after
using cash of $81.2 million in the first nine months of 2008. Inventories and accounts receivable
provided cash in the first nine months of 2009 primarily due to lower volumes and the Companys
concerted effort to improve working capital. Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including
income taxes, were a net use of cash of $169.4 million for the first nine months of 2009 after
providing cash of $97.1 million for the first nine months of 2008. Net income (including
discontinued operations), adjusted for impairment charges, decreased $303.3 million in the first
nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. Contributions to the Companys
defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit payments increased from $55.8
million for the first nine months of 2008 to $89.2 million for the first nine months of 2009. Cash
flow from discontinued operations decreased from $60.7 million in the first nine months of 2008 to
$33.3 million in the first nine months of 2009.
The net
cash used by investing activities of $75.6 million for the first nine months of 2009
decreased from the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower capital expenditures in the current
year and lower acquisition activity, partially offset by lower proceeds from disposals of property,
plant and equipment. Capital expenditures decreased $95.3 million in the first nine months of
2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. The Company expects to reduce capital expenditures
by approximately 50% in 2009, compared to 2008 levels, in response to the current economic
downturn. Cash used for acquisitions decreased $56.8 million in 2009, compared to the same period
in 2008, primarily due to the acquisition of the assets of BSI in 2008. Proceeds from the disposal
of property, plant and equipment decreased $27.2 million primarily due to the sale of the Companys
former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately
$28.0 million during the first quarter of 2008.
The net cash flows from financing activities used cash of $118.5 million during the first nine
months of 2009 after using cash of $12.7 million during the first nine months of 2008. The
increased use of cash was primarily due to repayments of debt. The Company reduced its net
borrowings, net of restricted cash, by $84.5 million during the first nine months of 2009 in light
of cash provided from operations and lower acquisition activity, as well as lower capital
expenditures. In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured Senior
Notes. The net proceeds of $248.2 million was reclassified to restricted cash and will be used to
redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes that mature in February 2010. In addition, net proceeds
from common share activity decreased $16.2 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to
the first nine months of 2008 as a result of fewer exercises of the Companys outstanding stock
options, partially offset by lower cash dividends paid to shareholders of $15.5 million in the
first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008, as a result of the Company
cutting its quarterly dividend beginning in the second quarter of 2009.
41
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total debt was $801.0 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $623.9 million at December 31,
2008. Net debt was $169.9 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $490.5 million at December
31, 2008. The net debt to capital ratio was 9.6% at September 30, 2009, compared to 22.8% at
December 31, 2008.
Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
$ |
91.5 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
268.6 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
469.1 |
|
|
|
515.3 |
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
801.0 |
|
|
|
623.9 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
(631.1 |
) |
|
|
(133.4 |
) |
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
169.9 |
|
|
$ |
490.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital: |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
169.9 |
|
|
$ |
490.5 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,591.0 |
|
|
|
1,663.1 |
|
|
Net debt + shareholders equity (capital) |
|
$ |
1,760.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,153.6 |
|
|
Ratio of net debt to capital |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
The Company presents net debt because it believes net debt is more representative of the Companys
financial position.
At September 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its Asset Securitization,
which provides for borrowings up to $175 million, subject to certain borrowing base limitations,
and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the Company. As of September 30, 2009,
although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization, certain
borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization to $75.6
million.
On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500 million Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement. This new Senior Credit Facility replaces the former Senior Credit Facility, which was
due to expire on June 30, 2010. The new Senior Credit Facility matures on July 10, 2012. At
September 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its new Senior Credit Facility
but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $35.5 million, which reduced the availability under
the new Senior Credit Facility to $464.5 million. Under the new Senior Credit Facility, the
Company has three financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest
coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum tangible net worth test. The maximum consolidated
leverage ratio permitted under the new Senior Credit Facility was 3.5 to 1.0. As of September 30,
2009, the Companys consolidated leverage ratio was 1.94 to 1.0. The minimum consolidated interest
coverage ratio permitted under the new Senior Credit Facility was 4.0 to 1.0. As of September 30,
2009, the Companys consolidated interest coverage ratio was 7.56 to 1.0. As of September 30,
2009, the Companys consolidated tangible net worth exceeded the minimum required amount by a
significant margin. Refer to Note 7 Financing Arrangements for further discussion.
The interest rate under the new Senior Credit Facility is based on the Companys consolidated
leverage ratio. In addition, the Company will pay a facility fee based on the consolidated
leverage ratio multiplied by the aggregate commitments of all of the lenders under this agreement.
Financing costs on the new Senior Credit Facility will be amortized over the life of the new
agreement and are expected to result in approximately $2.9 million in annual interest expense.
Other sources of liquidity include lines of credit for certain of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries, which provide for borrowings up to $383.3 million. The majority of these lines are
uncommitted. At September 30, 2009, the Company had borrowings outstanding of $63.3 million
against these lines, which reduced the availability under these facilities to $320 million.
42
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash on hand and cash generated from
operating activities will be met by the committed funds available under its Asset Securitization
and the new Senior Credit Facility. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its
obligations through at least the term of the new Senior Credit Facility.
The Company expects to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. However, the Company may need
to limit its borrowings under the new Senior Credit Facility or other facilities in order to remain
in compliance. As of September 30, 2009, the Company could have borrowed up to an additional $432
million under the new Senior Credit Facility or other facilities without violating its debt
covenants.
In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes. These
new Senior Notes, which mature in September 2014, bear interest at 6.0% per annum. The net
proceeds from the sale of the new Senior Notes will be used to redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior
Notes maturing in February 2010. The net proceeds from the sale of the new Senior Notes are
classified as restricted cash on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.
The Companys debt, including the new Senior Notes, is rated Baa3, by Moodys Investor Services
and BBB- by Standard & Poors Ratings Services, both of which are considered investment grade
credit ratings.
For the full year of 2009, the Company expects to generate cash from operations due to lower
working capital levels, as well as lower income taxes and reduced selling, administrative and
general expenses. In addition, the Company expects to decrease capital expenditures by 50% in
2009, compared to 2008. The Company also expects to make approximately $65 million in pension
contributions in 2009, compared to $22.1 million in 2008.
The Company may take further actions to reduce expenses and preserve liquidity beyond the actions
announced to-date as it reacts to economic and financial conditions. In addition, further actions
may be taken to reduce expenses in order to optimize the size of the Company as a result of current
and anticipated market demand. However, at this time these actions are not expected to have a
material impact on the liquidity of the Company.
In addition, the Company expects to receive approximately $330 million in cash proceeds from the
sale of the NRB operations (including certain receivables to be retained by the Company), subject
to working capital adjustments. The sale of the NRB operations is expected to close by the end of
2009.
Financing Obligations and Other Commitments
The Company currently expects to make cash contributions to its global defined benefit pension
plans of approximately $65 million in 2009. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company has
made cash contributions of approximately $55 million to its defined benefit pension plans. Returns
for the Companys global defined benefit pension plan assets in 2008 were significantly below the
expected rate of return assumption of 8.75 percent, due to broad declines in global equity markets.
These unfavorable returns negatively impacted the funded status of the plans at the end of 2008
and are expected to result in significant pension contributions over the next several years. The
decrease in global defined benefit pension assets in 2008 is expected to increase pension expense
by approximately $15 million in 2009 and may increase pension expense even further in years after
2009. Returns for the Companys U.S. defined benefit pension plan assets for the first nine
months of 2009 were approximately 20%, primarily due to strong performance in the global equity
markets.
During the first nine months of 2009, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock
as authorized under the Companys 2006 common stock purchase plan. This plan authorizes the
Company to buy, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, up to four million
shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes, up
to an aggregate of $180 million. The authorization expires on December 31, 2012.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other
persons.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued final accounting rules that
established the Accounting Standards Codification as a single source of authoritative accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied
by nongovernmental entities. Rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), as well as interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC
registrants. The new accounting rules established two levels of U.S. GAAP authoritative and non
authoritative. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards
and was effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. The Codification was not intended to
change or alter existing U.S. GAAP, and as a result, the new accounting rules establishing the
Accounting Standards Codification did not have an impact on results of operations and financial
condition.
43
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
In September 2006, the FASB issued accounting rules concerning fair value measurements. The new
accounting rules establish a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the
new rules expand the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately
disclosing the fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value
hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of
new accounting rules for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, effective January 1,
2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules related to business combinations. The new
accounting rules provide revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration
transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest and
goodwill acquired in a business combination. The new accounting rules expand required disclosures
surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. The new accounting rules
are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of the new accounting rules for business combinations, effective January 1, 2009,
did not have a material impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests. The new
accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the Company (sometimes called minority interests) to be clearly identified, presented,
and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from
the parents equity. All changes in the parents ownership interests are required to be accounted
for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated
subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. The new accounting rules on noncontrolling
interests are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to
comparative financial statements. The implementation of new accounting rules on noncontrolling
interests, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
In March 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules about derivative instruments and hedging
activities, which amended previous accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
The new accounting rules require entities to provide greater transparency through additional
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The new accounting rules are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of the new accounting rules on
derivative instruments and hedging activities, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures
on derivative instruments and related hedged item and did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition. See Note 16 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities for the expanded disclosures.
In June 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings
per share. The new accounting rules clarify that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. The new accounting rules
provide guidance on how to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute earnings per
share using the two-class method. The new accounting rules are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 31, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new
accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings per share did not have a material
impact on the Companys disclosure of earnings per share. See Note 10 Earnings Per Share for
the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting rules for subsequent events. The new accounting rules
establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The
new accounting rules are effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15,
2009 and were adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the new
accounting rules for subsequent events did not have a material impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on employers disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. The new accounting rules require the disclosure of additional
information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of
fair value measurements and concentrations of risk. The new accounting rules are effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets is not expected to have a material
impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
44
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
periods presented. The Company reviews its critical accounting policies throughout the year.
Except for the following critical accounting policies on Inventory and Goodwill, the Company has
concluded that there have been no changes to its critical accounting policies or estimates, as
described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Inventory:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 48% valued by the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and the remaining 52% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method. The majority of the Companys domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and all
of the Companys international (outside the United States) inventories are valued by the FIFO
method. An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of
each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO
calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and
costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, annual results may
differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
The Companys Steel segment recognized $20.3 million in LIFO income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, compared to LIFO expense of $27.3 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. Based on current expectations of inventory levels and costs, the Steel segment expects
to recognize approximately $25 million to $30 million in LIFO income for the year ended December
31, 2009. The expected reduction in the LIFO reserve for 2009 is a result of lower costs,
especially scrap steel costs, as well as lower inventory quantities. A 1.0% increase in costs
would reduce the current LIFO income estimate for 2009 by $1.5 million. A 1.0% increase in
inventory quantities would reduce the current LIFO income estimate for 2009 by $0.7 million.
Goodwill:
The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually.
The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual
forecasting process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Each interim
period, management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present
that would necessitate that a goodwill impairment analysis be performed in an interim period other
than during the fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. Step one compares the carrying amount of
the reporting unit to its estimated fair value. To the extent that the carrying value of the
reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, step two is performed, where the reporting units
carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent that
the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and
must be recognized.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Companys reporting
units are the same as its reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries, Aerospace
and Defense and Steel. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the
estimated fair value of each reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow
model) as well as a market approach, with its carrying value. The income approach and the market
approach are equally weighted in arriving at fair value, which the Company has applied
consistently.
The discounted cash flow model requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT
(earnings before interest and taxes) margins and capital expenditures. The Companys four
reporting units each provide their forecast of results for the next three years. These forecasts
are the basis for the information used in the discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow
model also requires the use of a discount rate and a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue
growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units), as well as
projections of future operating margins (for the period beyond the forecasted three years). During
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company used a discount rate for each of its four reporting units
ranging from 11% to 12% and a terminal revenue growth rate ranging from 2% to 3%. The difference
in the discount rates and terminal revenue growth rates is based on the underlying markets and
risks associated with each of the Companys reporting units.
The market approach requires several assumptions including sales multiples and EBITDA (earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples for comparable companies that
operate in the same markets as the Companys reporting units. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
the Company used sales multiples for its four reporting units ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 and EBITDA
multiples ranging from 3.8 to 8.0. The difference in the sales multiples and the EBITDA multiples
is due to the underlying markets associated with each of the Companys reporting units.
45
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
As a result of the goodwill impairment analysis performed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company recognized a goodwill impairment loss of $48.8 million for the Mobile Industries segment in
its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The fair value of each of the
Companys other reporting units exceeded its carrying value. As of December 31, 2008, the Company
had $230.0 million of goodwill on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which $167.6 million was
attributable to the Aerospace and Defense segment. See Note 8 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets in the Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 for carrying amount of goodwill by
segment. The Aerospace and Defense segment is the only reporting unit in which the fair value of
the reporting unit did not exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit by more than 10%. The
fair value of this reporting unit was $445.9 million compared to a carrying value of $436.2
million. A 40 basis point increase in the discount rate would have resulted in the Aerospace and
Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would have required the
completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a potential goodwill
impairment loss. A 450 basis point decrease in the projected cash flows would have resulted in the
Aerospace and Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would
have required the completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a
potential goodwill impairment loss.
Other Matters:
Foreign Currency:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the
balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing
during the quarter. Related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Foreign currency exchange losses included in the Companys operating results for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 were $2.5 million, compared to a gain of $2.4 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2008. Foreign currency exchange gains included in the Companys
operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $2.9 million, compared to a
gain of $0.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the three months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a positive non-cash foreign currency translation
adjustment of $31.8 million that increased shareholders equity, compared to a negative non-cash
foreign currency translation adjustment of $106.9 million that decreased shareholders equity for
the three months ended September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company recorded a positive non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $54.3 million that
increased shareholders equity, compared to a negative non-cash foreign currency translation
adjustment of $65.7 million that decreased shareholders equity in the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The foreign currency translation adjustments for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were positively impacted by the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other
currencies, such as the Brazilian real, the British pound, the South African rand, the Czech
Republic koruna and the Euro.
New Labor Contract:
On November 1, 2009, the Company reached a new four-year agreement with the United Steelworkers of
America. The contract went into effect immediately and expires September 30, 2013. The new
contract covers approximately 2,300 associates at the Companys steel and bearing plants in the
Canton, Ohio area.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements set forth in this document (including the Companys forecasts, beliefs and
expectations) that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis contains numerous forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers
that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company due to a variety of important factors, such as:
a) |
|
continued weakness in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from
the global economic slowdown, terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to,
political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in
countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency
valuations; |
b) |
|
the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the
industries in which the Company operates. This includes the ability of the Company to respond
to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer bankruptcies or liquidations,
the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade
continue in the U.S. markets; |
c) |
|
competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by
existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing
and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the Companys products are sold
or distributed; |
46
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
d) |
|
changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Companys
manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and
manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the
Companys ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and
the operation of the Companys surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated
with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction
initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages;
and changes in the cost of labor and benefits; |
e) |
|
the success of the Companys operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits
from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired
companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the Companys ability to maintain
appropriate relations with unions that represent Company associates in certain locations in
order to avoid disruptions of business; |
f) |
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to,
claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty,
environmental issues, and taxes; |
g) |
|
changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest
rates to the extent they affect the Companys ability to raise capital or increase the
Companys cost of funds, including the ability to refinance its unsecured notes, have an
impact on the overall performance of the Companys pension fund investments and/or cause
changes in the global economy and financial markets which affect customer demand and the
ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Companys products or equipment which
contains the Companys products; |
h) |
|
the Companys ability to successfully complete the sale of its Needle Roller Bearings
operations; and |
i) |
|
those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this document, in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 and in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
Additional risks relating to the Companys business, the industries in which the Company operates
or the Companys common stock may be described from time to time in the Companys filings with the
SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties
that may affect actual results and may be beyond the Companys control.
Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
47
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Refer to information appearing under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q. Furthermore, a discussion
of market risk exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. There have been no material changes in reported market risk since the
inclusion of this discussion in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K referenced above.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a) |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Companys principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).
Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
|
During the Companys most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. |
48
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 included a
detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below amends and updates
those risk factors and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information
disclosed in the Form 10-K and the Forms 10-Q.
Continued weakness in either global economic conditions or in any of the industries in which
our customers operate or sustained uncertainty in financial markets could adversely impact
our revenues and profitability by reducing demand and margins.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global economy
generally and in global capital markets. The current global economic downturn has caused
extreme volatility in the capital markets and in the end markets in which our customers
operate. Our revenues may be negatively affected by continued reduced customer demand,
additional changes in the product mix and negative pricing pressure in the industries in
which we operate. Margins in those industries are highly sensitive to demand cycles, and our
customers in those industries historically have tended to delay large capital projects,
including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. As a result, our
revenues and earnings are impacted by overall levels of industrial production.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global
financial markets. If an end user cannot obtain financing to purchase our products, either
directly or indirectly contained in machinery or equipment, demand for our products will be
reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.
Certain automotive industry companies are experiencing significant financial downturns.
While recent bankruptcies of certain automotive industry companies did not result in any
material losses to the Company, if any other automotive industry customers become insolvent
or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would
be adversely affected and any payment we received during the preference period prior to a
bankruptcy filing may be potentially recoverable by the bankruptcy estate. Furthermore, if
certain of our automotive industry customers liquidate in bankruptcy, we may incur
impairment charges relating to obsolete inventory and machinery and equipment. In addition,
financial instability of certain companies that participate in the automotive industry
supply chain could disrupt production in the industry. A disruption of production in the
automotive industry could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
earnings.
We may incur further impairment and restructuring charges that could materially affect our
profitability.
We have taken approximately $243 million in impairment and restructuring charges, during the
last four years, for the Canton bearing operations, Mobile Industries segment, Bearings and
Power Transmission Group and employment and other cost reduction initiatives. We expect to
take additional charges in connection with the Canton bearing operations, the Mobile
Industries segment, and the employment and cost reduction initiatives. Continued weakness in
business or economic conditions, or changes in our business strategy, may result in
additional restructuring programs and may require us to take additional charges in the
future, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.
49
The unprecedented conditions in the financial and credit markets may affect the availability
and cost of credit.
The financial and credit markets are experiencing unprecedented levels of volatility and
disruption, which has impacted the general availability of credit and resulted in
significantly higher financing costs. If we are unable to obtain credit as we need it, our
liquidity and ability to operate our business may be adversely impacted.
We may not be able to maintain compliance with the covenants contained in our debt
agreement.
We reported a net loss for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009. The U.S. and
global industrial manufacturing downturn deepened during 2009 and contributed to a decrease
in our sales and profitability. We cannot foresee whether our operations will generate
sufficient revenue for us to attain profitability in the future, and we may not be able to
reduce fixed costs sufficiently to improve our operating ratios.
In addition, our new Senior Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to
achieve certain financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified
financial ratios. In particular, our new Senior Credit Facility contains requirements
relating to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated interest coverage
ratio and a minimum consolidated net worth. These covenants could, among other things, limit
our ability to borrow against the new Senior Credit Facility or other facilities. Further,
our ability to meet the financial covenants or requirements in our new Senior Credit
Facility may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to satisfy
such covenants and requirements. A breach of these covenants or our inability to comply with
the financial ratios, tests or other restrictions could result in an event of default under
our new Senior Credit Facility, which in turn could result in an event of default under the
terms of our other indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our new
Senior Credit Facility, after the expiration of any grace periods, the lenders could elect
to declare all amounts outstanding under our new Senior Credit Facility, together with
accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, our assets may not be
sufficient to repay in full the payments due under that facility or our other indebtedness.
In addition, if we are unable to service our indebtedness or fund our operating costs, we
will be forced to adopt alternative strategies that may include:
|
|
|
further reducing or delaying capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
seeking additional debt financing or equity capital, possibly at a higher cost to us or have
other terms that are less attractive to us than would otherwise be the case; |
|
|
|
|
selling assets; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring or refinancing debt, which may increase further our financing costs; or |
|
|
|
|
curtailing or eliminating certain activities. |
Moreover, we may not be able to implement any of these strategies on satisfactory terms, if
at all.
Work stoppages or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt our operations, reduce
our revenues and materially affect our earnings.
A work stoppage at one or more of our facilities could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, if one or more of our
customers were to experience a work stoppage, that customer would likely halt or limit
purchases of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
50
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer of Purchases of Common Stock
The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 of its common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as |
|
shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly |
|
may yet |
|
|
Total number |
|
Average |
|
announced |
|
be purchased |
|
|
of shares |
|
price paid |
|
plans or |
|
under the plans |
Period |
|
purchased(1) |
|
per share(2) |
|
programs |
|
or programs(3) |
|
|
07/01/09 - 07/31/09 |
|
|
513 |
|
|
$ |
17.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
08/01/09 - 08/31/09 |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
20.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
09/01/09 - 09/30/09 |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
21.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
$ |
19.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares of the companys common stock that are owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares and the exercise of stock options. |
|
(2) |
|
For restricted shares, the price paid per share is an average calculated using the daily high and low of the
companys common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time of vesting. For stock options, the
price paid is the real time trading stock price at the time the options are exercised. |
|
(3) |
|
Pursuant to the companys 2006 common stock purchase plan, the company may purchase up to four million shares
of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the aggregate. The company may purchase shares
under its 2006 common stock purchase plan until December 31, 2012. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2009, by and
between The Timken Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as
Trustee |
|
|
12 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President Finance and
Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
|
Certifications of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) and Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President
Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
|
|
Date November 9, 2009 |
By |
/s/ James W. Griffith
|
|
|
|
James W. Griffith |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date November 9, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
|
|
|
|
Glenn A. Eisenberg |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Finance
and Administration (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|