e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
Number: 0-28132
Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
31-1455414
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
10200 Alliance Road, Suite 200
Cincinnati, OH
45242-4716
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(513) 794-7100
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of
the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
( Title of Class )
The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
(Name of exchange on which
listed)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12
(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K,
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant, computed using the closing
price as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. for the
Registrants Common Stock on July 31, 2009, was
$15,858,181.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common
Stock, $.01 par value, as of April 6, 2010: 9,556,179.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 26, 2010 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this
Form 10-K
to the extent stated herein. Except with respect to information
specifically incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K,
the Definitive Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as a
part hereof.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information contained herein, this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements relating to the
Companys plans, strategies, expectations, intentions, etc.
and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are no guarantee of
future performance and are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict and actual results
could differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, the impact of competitive
products and pricing, product demand and market acceptance, new
product development, key strategic alliances with vendors that
resell the Company products, the ability of the Company to
control costs, availability of products produced from third
party vendors, the healthcare regulatory environment, potential
changes in legislation, regulation and government funding
affecting the healthcare industry, healthcare information
systems budgets, availability of healthcare information systems
trained personnel for implementation of new systems, as well as
maintenance of legacy systems, fluctuations in operating
results, effects of critical accounting policies and judgments,
changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required
by the Financial Accountings Standards Board or other similar
entities, changes in economic, business and market conditions
impacting the healthcare industry, the markets in which the
Company operates and nationally, and the Companys ability
to maintain compliance with the terms of its credit facilities,
and other risk factors that might cause such differences
including those discussed herein, including, but not limited to,
discussions in the sections entitled Part I,
Item 1 Business, Item 1A Risk
Factors, Part II, Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplemental Data. In addition, other written or oral
statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be
made by or on behalf of the Company. Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which reflect managements analysis only as of the date
thereof. The Registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly
revise these forward-looking statements, to reflect events or
circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should
carefully review the risk factors described in this and other
documents Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. files from time to
time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and any Current Reports on
Form 8-K.
PART I
Company
Overview
Founded in 1989, Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
(Streamline
Health®
or the Company) is a healthcare information
technology company, which is focused on developing and licensing
proprietary software solutions that improve document-centric
information flows and complement and enhance existing
transaction-centric hospital healthcare information systems. The
Company sells its products in North America through its direct
sales force, and its reseller partnerships. The Company also
sells to direct remarketers, hospitals, clinical and ambulatory
services.
Document imaging and workflow management technologies like those
provided by Streamline Health are essential elements of a
complete Electronic Health Record (EHR) because they allow for
the storage of unstructured data. Unstructured data may consist
of patient record elements other than discrete data, such as
hand written physician or nursing notes and physician orders,
photographs, audio, video, and outside correspondence. The
Companys systems and services allow critical information
to be accessed, and eventually delivered to the caregiver at the
point of patient care. The Companys systems and services
can also help a providers existing system to achieve
meaningful use under the HITECH provisions of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). These
benefits encourage physicians to adopt the Companys
solutions because of convenient access to documents not
typically available in data-centric clinical information systems.
Streamline Healths solutions create an integrated
document-centric repository of historical health information
that is complementary to and can be seamlessly integrated with
existing transaction-centric clinical, financial and management
information systems. These solutions allow healthcare providers
to move toward a more complete EHR, while improving service
levels and convenience for all stakeholders. These integrated
systems allow providers and administrators to dramatically
improve the availability, accuracy, and timelines of patient
1
information, while decreasing direct costs associated with
document retrieval,
work-in-process,
chart completion, document retention and archiving.
The Companys applications allow authenticated users access
to protected health information (PHI) that exists in disparate
systems across the continuum of care. These applications improve
operational efficiencies through business process optimization,
as well as automating inefficient, labor-intensive paper
environments. These applications use document management and
advanced workflow tools to ensure users can electronically
access both structured (transaction-centric) and
unstructured (document-centric) patient information
from a single permanent and secure repository; including
clinicians handwritten notes, laboratory results,
photographs, insurance cards, human resource documents,
correspondence, etc.
The inefficiencies of paper-based medical records increase the
cost of patient care. Physicians often cannot gain access to the
entire medical record at the time of patient visits, and
multiple users cannot simultaneously access the record when only
a single copy of the paper-based patient record is available.
Based upon Streamline Healths experience in installing its
systems, a typical 500 bed hospital can produce 10,000 to 20,000
pages of new patient information each day. Even with
computerized admission, billing, laboratory and radiology
systems, individual physician document retrieval requests can be
as high as 100 documents per physician per day. The volume of
medical images in the patient record is expanding as well. In
addition, new image forms such as digitized slides, videos and
photographs proliferate. Thus, the ability to store and retrieve
document images of voluminous paper records on a timely basis is
a critical feature of a complete EHR.
Today, healthcare information is often stored on numerous
dissimilar host-based and departmental systems that are spread
throughout an enterprise and are not integrated. Additionally,
these current systems do not address the data stored on paper or
the increasing volume of medical images such as photographs,
audio, video etc. Streamline Health believes the efficiencies
and productivity of hospitals and integrated healthcare delivery
networks can be greatly enhanced by seamlessly integrating their
historical information systems with document management and
workflow applications. Streamline Health has image-enabled many
popular Hospital Information Systems, such as those offered by
Telus Health, GE Healthcare, Epic Systems, Eclipsys Corporation
and Cerner Corporation. Streamline Health is marketing
image-enabling technology through its Streamline Health
Integration Tools (STRM-IT) integration toolkit. Streamline
Health intends to continue to aggressively market its unique
image-enabling solutions to end-users and other third-party
software application providers. Streamline Health has several
large scale, enterprise wide image enabled sites, including
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, which utilizes
Streamline Healths solution on over 8,000 workstations and
over 1,250 simultaneous users at any point in time.
In order to simultaneously reduce costs and enhance the level of
patient care, hospitals and other healthcare providers are
requiring comprehensive, cost-effective information systems that
deliver rapid access to fully updated and complete patient
information. Traditional healthcare information systems are
inadequate because: (i) they do not capture large amounts
of the patient records which are paper-based and stored in
various sites throughout the enterprise; (ii) computerized
patient data is generated using a variety of disparate systems
which cannot share information; and (iii) multimedia
medical information such as video and audio information are
frequently inaccessible at the point of patient care.
Accordingly, hospitals and other healthcare providers are
increasing their information systems expenditures, which have
traditionally lagged behind other data-intensive industries such
as banking.
The Company operates primarily in one segment as a provider of
health information technology solutions that streamline
healthcare processes and information flows within a healthcare
facility.
Copies of documents filed by Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
etc., and all amendments to those reports, if any, can be found
at the web site www.streamlinehealth.net as soon as
practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies can
be downloaded free of charge from the Streamline Health web site
or directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission web
site,
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/srch-edgar.
Also, copies of Streamline Healths annual report on
2
Form 10-K
will be made available, free of charge, upon written request to
the Company. The Companys corporate office address is
10200 Alliance Road, Suite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242.
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing February 1 in that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year.
Products
Streamline Healths systems enable medical and
administrative personnel to more efficiently capture, store,
manage, route, retrieve and process vast amounts of clinical,
financial, patient and other information. Applications within
our systems fulfill the administrative and regulatory needs of
the Health Information Management, Patient Financial Services,
Administration and other hospital departments. These systems
have been specifically designed to integrate with any Clinical
Information System through various means, including our
proprietary software integration tool, STRM-IT. For example,
Streamline Health has integrated its solutions with selected
systems from Telus Health (Oacis Electronic Medical Record),
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Cerner Corporation, Eclipsys
Corporation, Epic Systems, Lawson Software, and GE Healthcare
applications, thus enabling customers to use our solutions
without the expense of replacing entire software systems to gain
the software functionality. By offering electronic access to all
the patient information components of the medical record, this
integration completes one of the most difficult tasks necessary
to provide a true Electronic Health Record. Streamline
Healths systems deliver enterprise-wide access to fully
updated patient information, which historically was maintained
on a variety of media, including paper, magnetic disk, optical
disk, and microfilm.
Streamline Healths health information management, patient
financial services, and administrative workflow solutions
provide financial, administrative, and clinical benefits to the
healthcare provider and facilitate more effective patient care.
These benefits include:
|
|
|
|
|
Easy to navigate, real-time computerized interfaces that are
physician-oriented and can be used at the point of patient care
|
|
|
|
Secured access to data under HIPAA standards to protect
patients healthcare information
|
|
|
|
Enterprise-wide access to patient lifetime medical records,
which assist in making informed clinical and financial decisions
|
|
|
|
Reduced costs for administrative personnel due to increased
workflow efficiency, as documents can be scanned, indexed, and
routed within an organization to all users who need to process
that information simultaneously, or in sequence as required
|
|
|
|
Increased productivity through the elimination of file
contention by providing multiple users simultaneous access to
patient medical records
|
|
|
|
Reduced costs and improved care through the reduction of
unnecessary testing and admissions
|
|
|
|
Improved cash flow through accelerated account receivable
collections and reductions in technical denials
(which occur when a third-party payer refuses payment because of
the providers inability to substantiate billing claims due
to loss of portions or all of the patient record)
|
|
|
|
Expedited treatment decisions, and fewer redundant tests as a
result of timely access to complete information
|
|
|
|
Fewer medical record errors by minimizing misfiled, lost and
improperly completed records; and
|
|
|
|
Increased security of patient information through improved
controls on access to confidential data and the creation of
audit trails that identify the persons who accessed or even
tried to access such information.
|
Streamline Health systems and services are built using advanced
document management and workflow automation technologies to
create robust Health Information Management (Medical Records),
Revenue Cycle, and administrative workflow solutions. Document
management technology makes paper-based information, as well as
medical images, sound and video information as readily available
and easy to process as traditional electronic data. In addition
to intelligent electronic routing of documents, workflow
automation offers sophisticated management tools and reporting
to increase efficiency and support of business process
re-engineering efforts.
3
Streamline Healths systems employ an open architecture
that leverages enterprise technologies from Microsoft, Oracle
and Sun Microsystems, and are designed to work within a
healthcare enterprise. These systems include user interfaces
designed specifically by Streamline Health for physicians, and
other medical and administrative personnel in hospitals and
integrated healthcare networks. Streamline Healths health
information management workflow solutions incorporate advanced
features, including workflow and security features, which allow
customers to restrict direct access to confidential patient
information, secure Protected Health Information from
unauthorized indirect access and have audit trail features.
Streamline Health has developed innovative application tool sets
to enable existing Hospital Information System applications,
thereby allowing users to have a common user interface on a
universal workstation. Streamline Health has also developed its
own document and workflow management middleware to efficiently
provide the object-oriented business processes common to all of
its applications, such as scanning/indexing, faxing/printing,
data archiving migration, security and auditing. Through its
application software, document management middleware, and its
workflow, image and web-enabling tools, Streamline Health allows
the seamless merging of its Medical Record and Patient Financial
Services department back office functionality with
existing clinical, billing and administrative information
systems at the desktop.
The Companys software solutions can be provided either by
purchased perpetual license which is installed locally in the
customers data center, or on a subscription basis via
Software as a Service (also referred to as
SaaS, hosting, hosted
delivery or application hosting services).
Application hosting services are remotely hosted from our
hosting center, rather than licensed and installed locally.
Under these arrangements, customers electronically capture
document-centric information at the healthcare facility and
securely transmit the data over a dedicated, secure data
communications line or virtual private network (VPN) via the
internet to the Streamline Healths established hosting
center. The hosting center runs Streamline Healths suite
of document workflow products, an offering called ASPeN
(Application Service Provider
e-health
Network).
Streamline Healths hosting services deliver high quality,
subscription-based services to healthcare providers which enable
them to achieve enhanced patient care, improved security, and
accessibility to patient records at significant cost savings;
with minimal up-front capital investment, maintenance, and
support costs. In addition, the healthcare provider need not
have knowledge of, expertise in, or control over the technology
infrastructure in the hosting center that supports them.
Providers realize benefits more quickly with less economic risk.
Our customers are charged on subscription, and occasionally on a
per transaction basis, which is an attractive alternative to
purchasing an in-house, locally installed system. This hosted
service is made possible through the advancement of web
browser-based technology,
state-of-the-art
communication technology and advanced software design.
accessANYwareTM
Streamline Healths core technology is a patient-centric
document management-based repository, accessANYware. The
accessANYware family of solutions work complementary to, and can
be seamlessly integrated with existing transaction-centric
clinical, financial and management information systems, allowing
healthcare providers to aggressively move toward a true EHR. It
allows authorized users to perform document searching,
retrieval, viewing, processing, printing and faxing, as well as
report generation all from a single login. It also
provides access to images such as digitized slides, videos and
photographs. In addition, it provides the ability to store and
retrieve document images of voluminous paper records on a timely
basis at the desktop.
The Company has successfully made generally-available its
fifth-generation accessANYware architecture. This development
effort included the consolidation of technology platforms onto
the Microsoft.NET platform, and also the internationalization of
the software to reach international markets. This
internationalization specifically included French Canadian
language capabilities as part of Streamline Healths
agreements with the Centre hospitalier de lUniversité
de Montréal (CHUM), the McGill University Health Centre
(MUHC), and LAgence de la santé et des sociaux de
Montreal (lAgence) via our distribution partner Telus
Health. Prior versions of accessANYware are still available for
sale, and the Company continues to provide full product support
for prior versions, as we anticipate several years before all
existing accessANYware customers complete a transition to
accessANYware 5.0.
4
Major changes from the fourth generation software to the fifth
generation software:
|
|
|
|
|
STRM-IT and accessANYware are now one product
|
|
|
|
Within the one application many modules may be added on to fit
customer needs, including custom workflows & uses
|
|
|
|
Migration of platform from Java to Microsoft.NET
|
|
|
|
Patient worklist divided into filtering section and document grid
|
|
|
|
Role-based, LDAP compliant security function built in, makes for
easier administration
|
|
|
|
Microsoft SQL Server Capable (Future)
|
Benefits of the new architecture:
|
|
|
|
|
Cutting-edge service oriented architecture
|
|
|
|
Enhanced database design better enforces table relationships and
constraints, prevents orphan records
|
|
|
|
Multi-entity, multi-timezone, and
multi-language
functionality
|
|
|
|
Provides for a higher level of integration with 3rd party
applications
|
|
|
|
Customizable user interfaces, sorts, grouping, filtering, and
workflow creation
|
|
|
|
Vastly improved product stability, which allows easier
support & troubleshooting, at less cost
|
|
|
|
Platform enables future expansion and easier integration with
customers existing systems
|
|
|
|
Shorter testing cycles
|
|
|
|
Faster
time-to-market
|
|
|
|
Simplified installation
|
The accessANYware family of products includes:
|
|
|
|
|
accessANYware HIM is an enterprise wide,
HIPAA/HITECH secure application that provides hospital
organizations the ability to electronically store, search and
retrieve medical records from any location within the facility,
physician offices, off-site clinics and even from home. In
addition, accessANYware HIM provides a complete
chart deficiency management system that includes analysis,
electronic signature and management reports all from
a single login. accessANYware HIM allows the user to
securely view the entire medical record from a visit view or a
category-based longitudinal view of historical patient
information.
|
|
|
|
accessANYware PFS is a HIPAA/HITECH secure
application that allows any department of a healthcare
organization the ability to store, retrieve and process
document-centric information using a site-defined electronic
folder hierarchy with a user-friendly interface.
accessANYware PFS provides document management and
workflow capabilities for a hospital organizations
enterprise-wide departmental needs, such as Patient Financial
Services, Business Office, Human Resources, Materials
Management, and virtually any other department that has document
intensive storage, retrieval and processing needs.
|
|
|
|
Streamline Health Integration Tools
STRM-ITtm
supports powerful image-enabling and workflow technology that
allows healthcare users to immediately and simultaneously access
any patient information, including multimedia and paper-based
information, through their existing third-party clinical, HR
administrative or billing applications. STRM-IT also supports
direct, secure access to the entire patient chart and physician
inbox via integration. As a result, any application across the
entire enterprise can be image-enabled, including the host
Healthcare Information Systems, Patient Billing Systems,
Clinical Data Repositories and others. When the Clinical Data
Repository is image-enabled, users can access any piece of
information on the same workstation and from the same screen
display, including the point of patient care.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
This means users can view traditional electronic data and images
simultaneously on the same screen without signing in and out of
multiple applications.
|
FolderView
FolderView complements our flagship solution, accessANYware, by
providing capture/indexing of non-patient centric documents,
storage in a historical repository, document search/viewing,
reporting, auditing and optional modules for Patient Financial
Services or Administrative Services applications. FolderView
provides a complete departmental document management solution
that addresses the content management needs of the full
organization in one application. Each department can create a
customized structure based on specific requirements, and
integrate department specific workflows to enhance the solution.
Significant features are multiple file type support, audio/video
support, version control features, email and fax integration,
and paperless markup capabilities.
Workflow
Solutions
The Companys departmental workflow-based solutions and
services offer solutions to specific healthcare business
processes within the Health Information Management (HIM) and
revenue cycle. These solutions offer value to all of the
constituents in the healthcare delivery process by enabling them
to simultaneously access and utilize Streamline Healths
advanced workflow applications to process information, on a
real-time basis from virtually any location, including the
physicians desktop, using web-based technology. Streamline
Healths solutions integrate its own proprietary document
management platform, application workflow modules, and image and
web-enabling tools that allow for the seamless merger of
back office functionality with existing Hospital
Information Systems at the desktop. Customers can purchase or
host the FolderView Workflow, departmental workflows, or can
consult the Company to design custom workflows based on their
needs.
The Streamline Health departmental workflow solutions are:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Management Workflow focuses on improving and
enhancing the cash posting, including the researching and follow
up functions within the business office for received
non-standard paper remittances. By scanning the documents into
the workflow, the manual posting is done from the image,
allowing the page to be captured and stored to the account level
in the customers accounting system.
|
|
|
|
Referral Order Workflow allows hospitals the ability to
electronically manage their inbound physician referral orders
through a workflow process from receipt through
pre-registration, and ultimately indexing into a central
electronic repository, accessANYware.
|
|
|
|
Chart Completion Workflow is a chart deficiency
management workflow that provides management reporting along
with providing analysts and clinicians the ability to remotely
analyze, electronically sign and complete deficient records. In
addition to a single login, Chart Completion Workflow delivers a
single user interface and integrated database. Therefore, from a
single system login, users with appropriate security have the
ability to search and retrieve information regarding patients
and cases (for chart analysis), view, print and fax patient
documents, as well as analyze or complete deficient documents.
The functions presented to the user vary with the users
security. For example, if the user is a clinician, they are
presented with an inbox function that displays a list of
incomplete charts (awaiting completion) and a list of
linked patients assigned to them. The clinician then
has the option to complete deficient charts or retrieve patient
information via searching or by clicking on the
linked patients within their inbox. This access may
occur from any workstation within the facility, the
physicians office, or some other remote site. With proper
security, the user is able to view, print and fax patient
information.
|
|
|
|
Coding Workflow provides workflow automation of the
coding and abstracting process by allowing hospital personnel to
electronically access documents to be coded and abstracted from
remote locations, including the employees home. It may
also be integrated with third-party encoding or abstracting
software, avoiding redundant data entry. Due to an acute
shortage of available coding personnel, there currently exists a
great demand for solutions to attract and retain qualified
coders and to make the coding process more efficient.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Release of Information Workflow fulfills internal and
external requests for patient information and allows for
automatic invoicing capability. It also provides the ability to
electronically search for, print, mail or fax information to
third parties that request copies of patient records.
|
|
|
|
Chart Tracking Workflow provides the ability to manage
requests for and track the physical location of paper records.
This workflow also allows the user to define the retention and
destruction of these paper records.
|
|
|
|
Financial Screening Workflow manages the rising number of
self-pay accounts that healthcare providers are experiencing by
forwarding the financial documents at the time of receipt to
insurance specialists to expedite charity care program analysis.
|
|
|
|
Pre-Operative Workflow manages patient documents and
reduces cancelled/rescheduled surgeries by proactively providing
required document sets for the scheduled surgery facilitating
those that are missing.
|
|
|
|
RAC/AMP Audit Workflow helps reduce
and/or
eliminate default states (absent documents, missed document
deadlines) and improve efficiency and productivity in managing
the federal governments Recovery Audit Contractor program
to minimize Medicare fraud and abuse.
|
|
|
|
FMLA/LOA Workflow tracks Family Medical Leave (FMLA) and
leave of absence requests (LOA) and helps to determine
eligibility, calculates employee payment for continued benefits.
creates notification letters, tracks expected return to work
date, and integrates with Lawson software.
|
|
|
|
Contract Management Workflow stores and retrieves
approved contracts with hospital vendors in FolderView database.
The workflow will track contracts and notify materials
management at user-specified intervals, as contracts are about
to expire. The workflow can be configured to track contracts
throughout the approval process. It will also maintain an
archive of expired and terminated contracts.
|
|
|
|
Contractor Management Workflow stores and retrieves
approved contractor documents. The workflow integrates
contractor data within the Contract Management Workflow. It will
notify at specific intervals materials management, department
heads, and contractors as documentation data about to expire,
and then archive expired documentation and terminated
contractors. It provides an interface for the providers
badge system to upload contractor photos. In addition, it allows
security to access contractor information, and make
determination on whether a contractor is cleared to work (OSHA).
|
Health
Information Management Suites
Streamline Health provides the opportunity to bundle solutions
to provide value offerings to customers. Customers can purchase
these bundled solutions based on their needs.
|
|
|
|
|
HIM Suite includes accessANYware Patient
Folders, Chart Completion Workflow, Release of Information
Workflow, Coding Workflow and Chart Tracking Workflow.
|
|
|
|
The PFS Suite includes accessANYware Non
Patient Folders, and a choice of three among the following
workflows: Referral Order Workflow, Pre-Operative Workflow,
Financial Screening Workflow and Cash Management Workflow, and
administrative workflows.
|
|
|
|
The Enterprise Suite is a full offering of Streamline
Health solutions including the HIM Suite, the PFS Suite, and the
Streamline Health Integration Tools (STRM-IT).
|
Professional
Services & Business Process Management
Consulting
Streamline Health provides a full complement of professional
services to implement its software applications. Streamline
Health believes that high quality consulting and professional
implementation services are important to attracting new
customers and maintaining existing customer satisfaction. These
services include implementation and training, project
management, business process optimization, and custom software
development. The implementation and training services include
equipment and software installation, system integration and
comprehensive training. The project management services include
needs and cost/benefit analysis, hardware and software
configuration and business process management. Business Process
Management Services (BPM) provides
7
consulting for customer document workflow applications. These
custom software development services include interface, workflow
optimization and report development.
Competition
Several companies historically have dominated the Clinical
Information System software market and several of these
companies have either acquired, developed or are developing
their own document management and workflow technologies. The
industry is undergoing consolidation and realignment as
companies position themselves to compete more effectively.
Strategic alliances between vendors offering health information
management workflow and document management technologies and
vendors of other healthcare systems are increasing. Barriers to
entry to this market include technological and application
sophistication, the ability to offer a proven product, a
well-established customer base and distribution channels, brand
recognition, the ability to operate on a variety of operating
systems and hardware platforms, the ability to integrate with
pre-existing systems and capital for sustained development and
marketing activities. Streamline Health believes that these
barriers taken together represent a moderate to high level
barrier to entry. Foreign competition has not been a significant
factor in the market, to date.
Streamline Health has many competitors including Clinical
Information System vendors that are larger and more established
and have substantially more resources than Streamline Health. In
addition, information and document management companies serving
other industries may enter the market. Suppliers and companies
with whom Streamline Health may establish strategic alliances
may also compete with Streamline Health. Such companies and
vendors may either individually, or by forming alliances
excluding Streamline Health, place bids for large agreements in
competition with Streamline Health. A decision on the part of
any of these competitors to focus additional resources in the
image-enabling, workflow, and other markets addressed by
Streamline Health could have a material adverse effect on
Streamline Health.
Streamline Health believes that the principal competitive
factors in its market are customer recommendations and
references, company reputation, system reliability, system
features and functionality (including ease of use),
technological advancements, customer service and support,
breadth and quality of the systems, the potential for
enhancements and future compatible products, the effectiveness
of marketing and sales efforts, price and the size and perceived
financial stability of the vendor. In addition, Streamline
Health believes that the speed with which companies in its
market can anticipate the evolving healthcare industry structure
and identify unmet needs are important competitive factors.
There can be no assurance that Streamline Health will be able to
compete successfully in the future against existing or potential
competitors.
Streamline Health believes that its principal competitors are:
Cerner Corporation; Eclipsys Corporation; Hyland Software, Inc.;
McKesson HBOC, Inc.; MedPlus, Inc. (a subsidiary of Quest
Diagnostics Incorporated); Perceptive Vision, Inc.; Siemens
Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (a subsidiary of Siemens AG); and
SoftMed Systems, Inc., (a unit of 3M).
Healthcare
Industry Trends Impacting Streamline Health
Rapid
Technological Change and Evolving Market
The market for Streamline Healths systems and services is
characterized by rapidly changing technologies, regulatory
requirements, evolving industry standards and new product
introductions and enhancements that may render existing
solutions obsolete or less competitive. As a result, Streamline
Healths position in the healthcare information technology
market could change rapidly due to unforeseen changes in the
features and functions of competing products, as well as the
pricing models for such products. Streamline Healths
future success will depend, in part, upon Streamline
Healths ability to enhance its existing systems and
services and to develop and introduce new systems and services
to meet changing requirements. Streamline Health believes the
demand for its health information document management and
workflow solutions, which can supply document management
capabilities to complement the data-centric elements of an EHR,
will increase in future years.
8
Changes
and Consolidation in the Healthcare Industry
Streamline Health derives substantially all of its revenues from
providing hosted services, the licensing of software, providing
professional services and maintenance services within the
healthcare industry. Accordingly, the success of Streamline
Health is dependent upon the regulatory and economic conditions
in the healthcare industry. Many healthcare providers are
consolidating to establish integrated healthcare delivery
networks to take advantage of economies of scale, greater
marketing power and greater leverage in negotiating with vendors
who supply the industry with the goods and services they
require. The impact of such consolidations, Streamline Health
believes, will benefit Streamline Health as more healthcare
organizations investigate methods to streamline operations,
including outsourcing non-core services to reduce costs and
improve the quality of patient care through the use of
information technology, especially in the paper intensive areas
of Patient Medical Records, Patient Financial Services, and
Administrative Services.
The
U.S. Healthcare System, U.S. Government Policy and Legislative
Initiatives
The mixed public-private healthcare system in the United States
is the most expensive in the world, with healthcare costing more
per person than in any other nation. According to the World
Health Organization 2009 Statistics, a greater portion of gross
domestic product (15.3% of GDP in 2006) is spent on
healthcare in the U.S. than in any other major
industrialized country in the world. The U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services has projected that health care as a
percentage of GDP would be 17.3% in 2009 and 19.3% by 2019. It
is widely accepted that the current national system does not
deliver an equivalent value for the overall dollars spent.
Streamline Health believes its solutions can reduce healthcare
costs for its customers, as has been demonstrated in return on
investment studies performed by a number of our customers
resulting in attractive payback periods.
In response to this projected growth in healthcare spending, the
healthcare industry is undergoing significant change as
competition and cost-containment measures imposed by
governmental and private payers have put significant pressures
on healthcare providers to control healthcare costs while
improving the quality patient care. At the same time, the
healthcare delivery system is experiencing a shift from a highly
fragmented group of non-allied healthcare providers to
integrated healthcare networks, which combine all of the
services, products and infrastructure necessary to address the
needs of healthcare customers. As a result, healthcare providers
are seeking to cut costs, increase productivity and enhance the
quality of patient care through improved access to information
throughout the entire hospital or integrated healthcare network.
The increased use of health information technology can aid in
creating a more efficient system for all stakeholders.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(Stimulus Bill or ARRA) was enacted by
the United States Congress and signed into law by President
Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The Act allocated
approximately $19 billion for health information technology
investment to reduce direct spending for health benefits and
improve overall efficiency and safety. The provision of the
legislation that addresses health information technology
specifically is known as the HITECH Act. Some highlights of the
HITECH Act that may impact Streamline Health are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
Intends to modernize U.S. healthcare system with health
information technology (HIT) investments to reduce cost and
improve quality of patient care, focusing on preventable errors
and inefficient paper billing systems
|
|
|
|
Goal of full deployment of EHR by 2014
|
|
|
|
$19B investment in HITECH Provision includes $40 thousand per
physician in EHR adoption incentives beginning in 2011 payable
through 2016
|
|
|
|
HIT extension programs for regional adoption via Regional Health
Information Organizations (RHIO)
|
|
|
|
Funds earmarked to states to promote interoperable EHRs
|
|
|
|
Education programs to train clinicians in EHRs
|
|
|
|
Dramatically increase the number of HIT professionals (current
shortage to meet aggressive EHR adoption plans)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Create HIT grant and loan programs
|
|
|
|
Accelerate construction of National Health Information Network
(NHIN)
|
Published articles have proved it difficult to estimate the
number of physician offices using electronic medical records.
Surveys have reported as few as 17% of physicians using EHR and
as high as 44%. However, the process of developing
meaningful use as defined by HITECH, can depend on
how the effectiveness of the system in place is measured. The
National Center for Health Statistics survey of doctors with EHR
systems reported that less than 5% reported having a
fully-functional system. Despite the enormous
investments in electronic medical record technology to date, the
majority of the patient records remain paper-based.
Streamline Health believes that the HIPAA (Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act) regulation are an additional
impetus for healthcare to embrace Streamline Health solutions as
a means of ensuring compliance with federal regulations.
Additionally, the healthcare industry is being strongly
encouraged by many professional medical organizations to make
greater use of information technology.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Health
Care Bill) was signed into law by President Obama on
March 23, 2010. The Health Care Bill places substantial
emphasis on the expansion health care coverage to a significant
amount of the currently uninsured, and introduces a significant
amount of new rules and regulations affecting the complete
continuum of care. Specifically, the implementation of the
provisions in the Health Care Bill may create new requirements
for healthcare information technology, such as those offered by
Streamline Health, such as audit compliance to combat waste,
fraud and abuse.
Contracts
Overview
To supplement its direct sales force, the Company has
remarketing agreements with large healthcare industry partners.
A summary of these remarketing agreements are detailed below:
In 2002, Streamline Health entered into a five year Remarketing
Agreement with IDX Information Systems Corporation, which was
subsequently acquired by GE Healthcare, a unit of the General
Electric Company in January 2006. Under the terms of the
Remarketing Agreement, IDX/GE was granted a non-exclusive
worldwide license to distribute all Streamline Health document
workflow and document management software including
accessANYware, Coding Workflow, and hosting services to its
customers and prospective customers, as defined in the
Remarketing Agreement. The Agreement has an automatic annual
renewal provision and, after the initial five year term, which
ended January 30, 2007, can be cancelled by IDX/GE upon
90 days written notice to the Company. This automatic
annual renewal provision now extends the agreement through
January 30, 2011. The Company has no reason to believe that
the agreement will not continue to be renewed annually or will
be terminated.
In December 2007, Streamline Health entered into an agreement
with Telus Health (formerly Emergis, Inc.), a large
international telecommunications corporation based in Canada, in
January 2008, under which Telus Health is integrating Streamline
Healths accessANYware document management repository and
document workflow applications into its Oacis (Open Architecture
Clinical Information System) Electronic Health Record solution.
In May 2008, Streamline Health and Telus Health announced their
agreement to provide their integrated document management and
workflow solution at the eight hospitals representing the Centre
hospitalier de lUniversité de Montréal (CHUM)
and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). Telus Health
integrated Streamline Healths accessANYware document
management and chart completion workflow solution into its Oacis
electronic medical record solution. The integrated solution
addresses clinicians need for immediate access to patient
records in hybrid environments, where electronic health records
still coexist with paper. CHUM and MUHC will be among the first
sites in Canada to deploy the integrated solution.
In May 2009, Streamline Health in collaboration with Telus
Health announced that, consistent with its international
expansion plans, the Companys document workflow solutions
will be integrated into the electronic medical records solution
for multiple facilities within an additional leading Canadian
healthcare region. Streamline Health has now secured two large
international contracts for implementation of its solutions
10
at a total of over 18 healthcare facilities. As a result of
these contracts, and the recent achievement by the Company of
the General Availability of its new multi-lingual product, the
Company recognized significant revenues in the fourth quarter of
2009.
In July 2009, Streamline Health entered into an agreement to
provide its integrated document management and workflow solution
to an existing hosted customer. This project will add
approximately $954,000 over a five year term to the current
relationship. The solution will create an online centralized
repository of all requested pre-surgery documents coupled with
smart software that alerts and tracks the entire process and
workflow. The solution also includes robust compliance reporting
as well as an interface to the customers surgery
scheduler. The revenues for the hosted solution, and the
professional services provided by the agreement are recognized
in accordance with the Companys revenue recognition
policies.
In November 2009, Streamline Health entered into a purchase
agreement to provide its integrated document management and
workflow solution to Moses Cone Health System. Streamline will
implement its enterprise document workflow solution integrated
into the GE Centricity electronic medical records solution in
the five-hospital health system in Greensboro, North Carolina.
The total value of the contract is in excess of
$1.0 million. The solution will transform the current
paper-based HIM department into a centralized hub for more
efficient workflow between the billing department, doctors, and
coders, while assisting the hospital system in achieving its
stated goal of becoming paperless within five years.
In February 2010, Streamline Health entered into a hosted
services agreement to provide its Audit Integrity Manager
Workflow solution, along with the option to buy additional
custom workflows as needed, to Childrens National Medical
Center in Washington D.C. The solution will expedite its
third-party reimbursement and cash flow processes, an aid its
compliance processes.
Signed
Agreements Backlog
Streamline Health enters into master agreements with its
customers to specify the scope of the system to be installed
and/or
services to be provided by Streamline Health, the agreed upon
aggregate price and the timetable for implementation. The master
agreement typically provides that Streamline Health will deliver
the system in phases, thereby allowing the customer flexibility
in the timing of its receipt of systems and to make adjustments
that may arise based upon changes in technology or changes in
customer needs. The master agreement also allows the customer to
request additional components as the installation progresses,
which additions are then separately negotiated as to price and
terms. Historically, customers have ultimately purchased systems
and services in addition to those originally contemplated by the
master agreement, although there can be no assurance that this
trend will continue in the future.
At January 31, 2010, Streamline Health has master
agreements and purchase orders from remarketing partners for
systems and related services (excluding support and maintenance,
and transaction-based revenues for the application-hosting
services) that have not been delivered, and or installed. These
systems and services are expected to be delivered over the next
two to three years. In addition, the Companys master
agreements also generally provide for a limited initial
maintenance period and require the customer to subscribe for
maintenance and support services on a monthly, quarterly, or
annual basis. Maintenance and support revenues are expected to
increase in future periods.
The commencement of revenue recognition varies depending on the
size and complexity of the system, the implementation schedule
requested by the customer and usage by customers of the
application-hosting services. Therefore, it is difficult for the
Company to accurately predict the revenue it expects to achieve
in any particular period. The Companys master agreements
generally provide that the customer may terminate its agreement
upon a material breach by Streamline Health, or may delay
certain aspects of the installation. There can be no assurance
that a customer will not cancel all or any portion of a master
agreement or delay installations. A termination or installation
delay of one or more phases of an agreement, or the failure of
Streamline Health to procure additional agreements, could have a
material adverse effect on Streamline Healths business,
financial condition, and results of operations. The Company does
not have a history of contract cancellations, however delays are
sometimes experienced in the course of the contract and are
accounted for accordingly.
11
See also ITEM 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Backlog, for an explanation of the current year backlog compared
with the prior year backlog.
License
fees
The Company incorporates software licensed from various vendors
into its proprietary software. In addition, third-party,
stand-alone software is required to operate Streamline
Healths proprietary software. The Company licenses these
software products, and pays the required license fees when such
software is delivered to customers.
Employees
As of January 31, 2010, Streamline Health had
97 full-time employees, a net increase of 7 during the
fiscal year. The Company utilizes independent contractors to
supplement its staff, as needed. None of Companys
employees are represented by a labor union or subject to a
collective bargaining agreement. The Company has never
experienced a work stoppage and believes that its employee
relations are good.
Key
Personnel
Streamline Healths success depends, to a significant
degree, on its management, sales and technical personnel.
Streamline Health must recruit, motivate and retain highly
skilled managers, sales force, consulting and technical
personnel, including application programmers, database
specialists, consultants and system architects skilled in the
technical environments in which Streamline Healths systems
operate. Competition for such technical expertise is intense.
Our failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could have
a material adverse impact on the Company.
Regulatory
Matters
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
asked the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of
Sciences to design a standardized model of an electronic health
record, in a move that may help spur nationwide acceptance of
EHRs. The impact of such a change, if implemented by HHS,
on current Streamline Health systems and services is unknown at
this time. However, Streamline Health believes that its systems
are sufficiently flexible to accommodate changing regulatory
requirements. Patient privacy is of utmost concern, as evidenced
by current HIPAA regulations. Streamline Healths systems
enable a healthcare organization to lock down Protected Health
Information, as defined by HIPAA, by preventing unauthorized
access and providing audit trails for every occurrence of access
to PHI.
Regulations
Relating to Confidentiality
Federal and state laws regulate the confidentiality of patient
records and the circumstances under which such records may be
released. These regulations govern both the disclosure and use
of Protected Health Information (PHI). Regulations governing
electronic health data privacy are continuing to evolve. The
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of
1996, enacted August 22, 1996, is designed to improve the
efficiency of healthcare by standardizing the interchange of
specified electronic data, and to protect the security and
confidentiality of PHI. The legislation requires that covered
entities comply with national standards for certain types of
electronic health information transactions and the data elements
used in such transactions, and adopt policies and practices to
ensure the integrity and confidentiality of PHI.
Regulations adopted pursuant to HIPAA include rules addressing
several areas. The Privacy Rule also extended the scope of
enforcement to PHI residing on non-electronic media, such as
paper, as well as to email, oral and written communications.
Streamline Health cannot predict the potential impact of new or
revised regulations that have not yet been released or made
final, or any other regulations that might be adopted. Congress
may adopt legislation that may change, override, conflict with,
or preempt the currently issued regulations. Additionally,
legislation governing the dissemination of patient health
information is also from time to time proposed and debated at
the state level. These laws or regulations, when adopted, could
restrict the ability of customers to obtain, use, or disseminate
PHI. Streamline Health believes that the features and
architecture of Streamline Healths systems are
12
such that it currently supports or should be able to make the
necessary modifications to its products, if required, to ensure
support of the HIPAA regulations, and other legislation or
regulations.
However, if the regulations are unduly restrictive, this could
cause delays in the delivery of new versions of software and
adversely affect the licensing of Streamline Healths
software. Overall, Streamline Health believes the HIPAA
regulations will continue to stimulate healthcare organizations
to purchase computer-based EHR systems that automate the
collection, use, and disclosure of PHI, while maintaining
appropriate security and audit controls over the information.
However, there can be no assurance that an increase in the
purchase of new systems or additional use of Streamline Health
software and services will occur.
Limited
Protection of Proprietary Technology
The success of Streamline Health depends on the protection of
its intellectual property rights relating to its proprietary
technology. Streamline Health relies on a combination of
confidentiality, nondisclosure, license, employment agreements,
trade secret laws, copyrights, and restrictions on the
disclosure of its intellectual property. Notwithstanding these
precautions, others may copy, reverse engineer or design
independently, technology similar to Streamline Healths
products. It may be necessary to litigate to enforce or defend
Streamline Healths proprietary technology or to determine
the validity of the intellectual property rights of others.
Streamline Health could also be required to defend itself
against claims made by third parties for intellectual property
right infringement. Any litigation, could be successful or
unsuccessful, may result in substantial cost and require
significant attention by management and technical personnel.
See also, PART I, ITEM 1, BUSINESS.
The following is a list of risk factors that affect the Company.
They are not listed in any particular order or relative
importance and no inferences should be given to the listing
order. In addition, risks and uncertainties not currently known
to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company, its
financial condition
and/or
operating results.
The
variability of the Companys quarterly operating results
can be significant.
The Companys operating results have fluctuated from
quarter to quarter in the past, and the Company may experience
continued fluctuations in the future. Future revenues and
operating results may vary significantly from
quarter-to-quarter
as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside
the control of the Company. These factors include: the
relatively large size of customer agreements; unpredictability
in the number and timing of system sales and sales of
applications hosting services; length of the sales cycle; delays
in installations; changes in customers financial condition
or budgets; increased competition; the development and
introduction of new products and services; the loss of
significant customers or remarketing partners; changes in
government regulations, particularly as to the healthcare
industry; the size and growth of the overall healthcare
information technology markets; any liability and other claims
that may be asserted against the Company; the Companys
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; national and
local general economic and market conditions; and other factors
referenced or incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K
and any other filings by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
The
Companys sales have been concentrated in a small number of
customers.
The Companys revenues have been concentrated in a
relatively small number of large customers, and the Company has
historically derived a substantial percentage of its total
revenues from a few customers. There can be no assurance that a
customer will not cancel all or any portion of a master
agreement or delay installations. A termination or installation
delay of one or more phases of an agreement, or the failure of
Streamline Health to procure additional agreements, could have a
material adverse effect on Streamline Healths business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
13
In
addition to direct sales, the Company relies on third party
remarketing alliances for a substantial portion of its revenues.
The Company seeks to expand its distribution channels by
creating remarketing alliances with third parties who are
engaged in the sale of healthcare information systems, medical
records management and outsourcing, and other healthcare
information technology and patient care solutions. GE Healthcare
and Telus Health, the Companys major remarketing partners,
could choose to discontinue reselling Streamline Health
products, and significant customers could elect to discontinue
using the Companys products. The Company needs to ensure
that it expands its distribution channels to reduce the reliance
on a single major reseller.
The
Company could be less profitable than
expected.
Because of the relatively fixed operating expenses and overhead,
the future profitability of the Company is dependent on
increasing revenues which may not materialize as anticipated.
Because of the Companys anticipated shift in strategic
focus towards remote application hosting services, upon
obtaining new application hosting customers, the Company will
have to expend a significant amount of costs and time before
those new customers are able to begin using such services and
the Company cannot begin to recognize revenues from those
clients until the commencement of such services. Accordingly,
the Company anticipates that its near term cash flow, revenue
and profitability may be adversely affected by this shift in
strategic focus until new hosting customers go into production.
While the Company anticipates long term growth through increases
in recurring subscription fees and significantly improved profit
visibility, the Companys failure to successfully implement
its focus on building its application hosting services business,
or the failure of such initiative to result in improved
profitability, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys liquidity, financial position and results of
operations.
The
Company needs to manage its costs while planning for
growth.
The Company is currently experiencing a period of growth
primarily through its remote application hosting line of
business and this could continue to place a significant strain
on the Companys cash flow. This could also strain the
services and support operations, sales and administrative
personnel and other resources as they are requested to handle
the added work load with existing support resources. Streamline
Health believes that it must continue to focus on these remote
hosting services, develop new products, enhance existing
solutions and serve the needs of its existing and anticipated
customer base. The Companys ability to successfully
maintain and expand its operations will depend, in large part,
upon its ability to attract and retain highly qualified
employees. The Companys ability to manage its planned
growth effectively also will require the Company to continue to
improve its operational, management, and financial systems and
controls, to train, motivate, and manage its employees and to
judiciously manage its operating expenses in anticipation of
increased future revenues.
The
potential impact on the Company of new or changes in existing
federal, state, and local regulations governing healthcare
information could be substantial.
Healthcare regulations issued to date have not had a material
adverse affect on the Companys business. However, the
Company cannot predict the potential impact of new or revised
regulations that have not yet been released or made final, or
any other regulations that might be adopted. Congress may adopt
legislation that may change, override, conflict with, or preempt
the currently existing regulations and which could restrict the
ability of customers to obtain, use, or disseminate patient
health information. Streamline Health believes that the features
and architecture of its existing solutions are such that it
currently supports or should be able to make the necessary
modifications to its products, if required, to ensure support of
HIPAA regulations, and other legislation or regulations, but
there can be no assurances.
While
provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 may increase the demand for healthcare information
technology, including the solutions offered by the Company, such
laws and regulations may have adverse consequences on the
Company.
Legislation governing the dissemination of patient health
information is also from
time-to-time
proposed and debated at the federal and state level including,
but not limited to, the healthcare initiatives set forth in The
14
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the
Stimulus Bill) signed into law by President Obama on
February 17, 2009. Notwithstanding that the Stimulus Bill
places substantial emphasis on the modernization of the
U.S. healthcare system by using healthcare information
technology, with a primary focus on electronic medical records,
the Companys ability to benefit from such initiatives is
uncertain at this time. The implementation of the provisions in
the Stimulus Bill may create new requirements for healthcare
information technology that would require the Company to incur
additional research and development expenditures to modify or
expand its solutions in order to be fully compliant. In
addition, until it becomes more clear how the government will
apply its anticipated substantial funding of these healthcare
initiatives, hospitals and other healthcare providers may delay
purchases of new solutions until additional details become
known. In such event, the Company may experience delays in
entering into new agreements with existing customers and
potential new customers. The substantial sums of money
contemplated by the Stimulus Bill to be spent on healthcare
information technology further may increase competition by
attracting new and financially stronger entities to this
industry.
While
provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may
increase the demand for healthcare information technology,
including the solutions offered by the Company, such laws and
regulations may have adverse consequences on the
Company.
Legislation governing the dissemination of patient health
information is also from
time-to-time
proposed and debated at the federal and state level including,
but not limited to, the healthcare initiatives set forth in the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Health
Care Bill) signed into law by President Obama on
March 23, 2010. Notwithstanding that the Health Care Bill
places substantial emphasis on the expansion of health care
coverage to 31 million currently uninsured Americans, and
introduces a significant amount of new rules and regulations
affecting the complete continuum of care, the Companys
ability to benefit from such initiatives is uncertain at this
time. The implementation of the provisions in the Health Care
Bill may create new requirements for healthcare information
technology that would require the Company to incur additional
research and development expenditures to modify or expand its
solutions in order to be fully compliant with any new
regulations, or compete with other vendors. In addition, until
it becomes clearer how the new rules and regulations will affect
the administration, insurance and technology aspects of the
delivery system, care providers may delay purchases of new
solutions until additional details become known. In such event,
the Company may experience delays in entering into new
agreements with existing customers and potential new customers.
Streamline
Health faces significant competition, including from companies
with significantly greater resources.
The Company currently competes with many other companies for the
licensing of similar software solutions and related services.
Several companies historically have dominated the clinical
information systems software market and several of these
companies have either acquired, developed or are developing
their own document management and workflow technologies. The
industry is undergoing consolidation and realignment as
companies position themselves to compete more effectively. Many
of these companies are larger than Streamline Health and have
significantly more resources to invest in their business. In
addition, information and document management companies serving
other industries may enter the market. Suppliers and companies
with whom Streamline Health may establish strategic alliances
may also compete with Streamline Health. Such companies and
vendors may either individually, or by forming alliances
excluding Streamline Health, place bids for large agreements in
competition with Streamline Health. A decision on the part of
any of these competitors to focus additional resources in the
image-enabling, workflow, and other markets addressed by
Streamline Health could have a material adverse effect on
Streamline Health.
The
healthcare industry is evolving rapidly, which may make it more
difficult for the Company to be competitive in the
future.
The U.S. healthcare system is under intense pressure to
improve in many areas, including modernization, universal access
and controlling skyrocketing costs of care. Streamline Health
believes that the principal competitive factors in its market
are customer recommendations and references, company reputation,
system reliability, system features and functionality (including
ease of use), technological advancements, customer service and
15
support, breadth and quality of the systems, the potential for
enhancements and future compatible products, the effectiveness
of marketing and sales efforts, price and the size and perceived
financial stability of the vendor. In addition, the Company
believes that the speed with which companies in its market can
anticipate the evolving healthcare industry structure and
identify unmet needs are important competitive factors. There
can be no assurance that Streamline Health will be able to keep
pace with changing conditions and new developments such that it
will be able to compete successfully in the future against
existing or potential competitors.
Rapid
technology changes and short product life cycles could harm
Streamline Healths business.
The market for Streamline Healths solutions and services
is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, regulatory
requirements, evolving industry standards and new product
introductions and enhancements that may render existing
solutions obsolete or less competitive. As a result, Streamline
Healths position in the healthcare information technology
market could change rapidly due to unforeseen changes in the
features and functions of competing products, as well as the
pricing models for such products. The Companys future
success will depend, in part, upon the Companys ability to
enhance its existing solutions and services and to develop and
introduce new solutions and services to meet changing
requirements. The Company needs to maintain an ongoing research
and development program to continue to develop new solutions and
apply new technologies to its existing products, but may not
have sufficient funds with which to undertake such required
research and development. If the Company is not able to foresee
changes
and/or to
react in a timely manner to such developments, the Company may
experience a material, adverse impact on its business, operating
results, and financial condition.
Streamline
Healths intellectual property rights are valuable, and any
inability to protect them could reduce the value of Streamline
Healths solutions and services.
The Company trademarks and copyrights its intellectual property,
which represents an important asset to the Company. Streamline
Health does not have any patent protection on any of its
software. The Company relies upon license agreements, employment
agreements, confidentiality, nondisclosure agreements, etc. to
maintain the confidentiality of Streamline Healths
proprietary information and trade secrets. Notwithstanding these
precautions, others may copy, reverse engineer or design
independently, technology similar to Streamline Healths
products. If the Company fails to adequately protect the
intellectual property through trademarks and copyrights, license
agreements, employment agreements, confidentiality,
nondisclosure agreements, etc., the intellectual property rights
may be misappropriated by others, invalidated, or challenged,
and our competitors could duplicate the Companys
technology or may otherwise limit any competitive technology
advantage the Company may have. It may be necessary to litigate
to enforce or defend Streamline Healths proprietary
technology or to determine the validity of the intellectual
property rights of others. Any litigation, could be successful
or unsuccessful, may result in substantial cost and require
significant attention by management and technical personnel.
Due to the rapid pace of technology change, the Company believes
its future success is likely to depend upon continued
innovation, technical expertise, marketing skills and customer
support and services rather than on legal protection of our
property rights. However, the Company has in the past, and
intends in the future, to aggressively assert its intellectual
property rights when necessary.
The
Company could be subjected to claims of intellectual property
infringement, which claims could be expensive to
defend.
While the Company does not believe that its products and
services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third
parties, the potential for intellectual property infringement
claims continually increases as the number of software patents
and copyrighted and trademarked materials continues to rapidly
expand. Any claim for intellectual property right infringement,
even if not meritorious, would be expensive to defend. If the
Company were to become liable for infringing third party
intellectual property rights, the Company could be liable for
substantial damage awards, and potentially be required to cease
using the technology, to produce non-infringing technology, or
to obtain a license to use such technology. Such potential
liabilities or increased costs could be materially adverse to
the Company.
16
The
Companys customers must comply with extensive regulations
relating to confidentiality and, accordingly, the Companys
solutions must be able to assist its customers in complying with
such regulations.
Federal and state laws regulate the confidentiality of patient
records and the circumstances under which such records may be
released. Regulations governing electronic health data privacy
are continuing to evolve. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, enacted August 22,
1996, is designed to improve the efficiency of healthcare by
standardizing the interchange of specified electronic data, and
to protect the security and confidentiality of protected health
information. HIPAA requires that covered entities comply with
national standards for certain types of electronic health
information transactions and the data elements used in such
transactions, and adopt policies and practices to ensure the
integrity and confidentiality of Protected Health Information.
Streamline Health cannot predict the potential impact of new or
revised regulations that have not yet been released or made
final, or any other regulations that might be adopted.
Streamline Health believes that the features and architecture of
Streamline Healths solutions are such that it currently
supports or should be able to make the necessary modifications
to its products, if required, to ensure support of the HIPAA
regulations, and other legislation or regulations. However, if
the regulations are unduly restrictive, this could cause delays
in the delivery of new versions of solutions and adversely
affect the licensing of Streamline Healths solutions.
However, there can be no assurance that an increase in the
purchase of new systems or additional use of Streamline Health
software and services will occur.
Third
party products are essential to Streamline Healths
software.
Streamline Health software incorporates software licensed from
various vendors into its proprietary software. In addition,
third-party, stand-alone software is required to operate some of
the Companys proprietary software modules. The loss of the
ability to use these third party products, or ability to obtain
substitute third party software at comparable prices, could have
a material adverse affect on the ability to license Streamline
Health software.
Streamline
Healths solutions may not be error free and could result
in claims of breach of contract and
liabilities.
Streamline Healths solutions are very complex and may not
be error free, especially when first released. Although the
Company performs extensive testing, failure of any product to
operate in accordance with its specifications and documentation
could constitute a breach of the license agreement and require
Streamline Health to correct the deficiency. If such deficiency
is not corrected within the agreed upon contractual limitations
on liability and cannot be corrected in a timely manner, it
could constitute a material breach of a contract allowing the
termination thereof and possibly subjecting the Company to
liability. Also, Streamline Health sometimes indemnifies its
customers against third-party infringement claims. If such
claims are made, even if they are without merit, they could be
expensive to defend. Streamline Healths license agreement
generally limits the Companys liability arising from
claims such as described in the foregoing sentences, but such
limits may not be enforceable in some jurisdictions or under
some circumstances. A significant uninsured or under-insured
judgment against the Company could have a material adverse
impact on the Company.
The
Company could be liable to third parties from the use of the
Companys solutions.
The Companys solutions provide access to patient
information used by physicians and other medical personnel in
providing medical care. The medical care provided by physicians
and other medical personnel are subject to numerous medical
malpractice and other claims. The Company attempts to limit any
potential liability of the Company to customers by limiting the
warranties on its solutions in the Companys agreements
with the Companys customer, the healthcare provider.
However, such agreements do not protect the Company from third
party claims by patients who may seek damages from any or all
persons or entities connected to the process of delivering
patient care. The Company maintains insurance, which provides
limited protection from such claims, if such claims against the
Company would result in liability to the Company. Although no
such claims have been brought against the Company to date
regarding injuries related to the use of our solutions, such
claims may be made
17
in the future. A significant uninsured or under-insured judgment
against the Company could have a material adverse impact on the
Company.
The
Companys remote application hosting services and support
services could experience interruptions.
The Company provides remote hosting services for many clients,
including the storage of critical patient, financial and
administrative data. In addition, it provides support services
to clients through the client support facility. The Company has
redundancies, such as backup generators, redundant
telecommunications lines, and backup facilities built into its
operations to prevent disruptions. However, complete failure of
all generators or impairment of all telecommunications lines or
severe casualty damage to the primary building or equipment
inside the primary building housing our hosting center or client
support facilities could cause a temporary disruption in
operations and adversely affect clients who depend on the
application hosting services. Any interruption in operations at
its data center or client support facility could cause the
Company to lose existing clients, impede our ability to obtain
new clients, result in revenue loss, cause potential liability
to our clients, and increase our operating costs.
The
Companys remote application hosting services are provided
over an internet connection. Any breach of security or
confidentiality of protected health information could expose the
Company to significant expense, and harm to the Companys
reputation.
The Company provides remote hosting services for clients,
including the storage of critical patient, financial and
administrative data. The Company has security measures in place
to prevent or detect misappropriation of Protected Heath
Information. The Company must maintain facility and systems
security measures to preserve the confidentiality of data
belonging to clients as well as their patients that resides on
computer equipment in the Data Center, which we handle via
application hosting services, or that is otherwise in the
Companys possession. Notwithstanding efforts undertaken to
protect data, it can be vulnerable to infiltration as well as
unintentional lapse. If confidential information is compromised,
the Company could face claims for contract breach, penalties and
other liabilities for violation of applicable laws or
regulations, significant costs for remediation and
re-engineering to prevent future occurrences, and serious harm
to the Companys reputation.
The
loss of key personnel could adversely affect Streamline
Healths business.
Streamline Healths success depends, to a significant
degree, on its management, sales force and technical personnel.
The Company must recruit, motivate, and retain highly skilled
managers, sales, consulting and technical personnel, including
application programmers, database specialists, consultants, and
system architects who have the requisite expertise in the
technical environments in which our solutions operate.
Competition for such technical expertise is intense. The
Companys failure to attract and retain qualified personnel
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The
Company may not have access to sufficient capital to be
competitive in its markets.
Streamline Health may need additional capital in the form of
loans or equity in order to operate and to be competitive. The
Company may be limited to the availability of such capital or
may not have any availability, in which case the Companys
future prospects may be materially impaired.
The
Company must maintain compliance with the terms of its existing
credit facilities. The failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys ability to finance its
ongoing operations and the Company may not be able to find an
alternative lending source if a default would
occur.
On October 21, 2009, the Company entered into an amended
and restated revolving credit facility with its existing lender.
Upon doing so, the Company was able to negotiate modified terms
in which the minimum tangible net worth requirement was
eliminated. There can be no assurances that the Company will be
able to maintain compliance with all of the continuing covenants
and other terms and conditions of this credit facility on an
ongoing basis. If not, the Company could be required to pay back
the amounts borrowed on an accelerated basis, which could
subject the Company to decreased liquidity and other negative
impacts on the Companys business, results of
18
operations and financial condition. Furthermore, if the Company
would need to find an alternative lending source, the Company
may have difficulty in doing so, particularly in the current
credit environment which is not favorable to borrowers. Without
a sufficient credit facility, the Company would be adversely
affected by a lack of access to liquidity needed to operate the
Companys business. Any disruption in access to credit
could force the Company to take measures to conserve cash, such
as deferring important research and development expenses, which
measures could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Potential
disruptions in the credit markets may adversely affect our
business, including the availability and cost of short-term
funds for liquidity requirements and our ability to meet
long-term commitments, which could adversely affect our results
of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
If internal funds are not available from operations, the Company
may be required to rely on the banking and credit markets to
meet its financial commitments and short-term liquidity needs.
The Companys access to funds under its revolving credit
facility or pursuant to arrangements with other financial
institutions is dependent on the ability of the financial
institutions ability to meet funding commitments.
Financial institutions may not be able to meet their funding
commitments if they experience shortages of capital and
liquidity or if they experience high volumes of borrowing
requests from other borrowers within a short period of time.
Current
economic conditions in the United States and globally may have
significant effects on the Companys customers and
suppliers that would result in material adverse effects on the
Companys business, operating results and stock
price.
Current economic conditions in the United States and globally
and the concern that the worldwide economy may enter into a
prolonged recessionary period may materially adversely affect
the Companys customers access to capital or
willingness to spend capital on the Companys products and
services
and/or their
levels of cash liquidity in with which or willingness to pay for
products that they will order or have already ordered from the
Company. Continuing adverse economic conditions would also
likely negatively impact the Companys business, which
could result in: (1) reduced demand for the Companys
products and services; (2) increased price competition for
the Companys products and services; (3) increased
risk of collectability of cash from the Companys
customers; (4) increased risk in potential reserves for
doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable;
(5) reduced revenues; and (6) higher operating costs
as a percentage of revenues.
All of the foregoing potential consequences of the current
economic conditions are difficult to forecast and mitigate. As a
consequence, the Companys operating results for a
particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore,
prior results are not necessarily indicative of future results
to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing effects
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, results of operations and financial condition and
could adversely affect the Companys stock price.
The
market price of the Companys common stock is likely to be
highly volatile as the stock market in general can be highly
volatile.
The public trading of the Companys common stock is based
on many factors, which could cause fluctuation in the price of
the Companys common stock. These factors may include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
General economic and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
Actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;
|
|
|
|
Lack of research coverage by securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
Conditions or trends in the healthcare information technology
industry;
|
|
|
|
Changes in the market valuations of other companies in the
Companys industry;
|
|
|
|
Announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, divestitures, joint
ventures or other strategic initiatives;
|
|
|
|
Capital commitments;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Additional or departures of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
Sales and repurchases of the Companys common stock.
|
Many of these factors are beyond the Companys control.
These factors may cause the market price of the Companys
common stock to decline, regardless of the Companys
operating performance.
The
preparation of the Companys financial statements requires
the use of estimates that may vary from actual
results.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make significant
estimates that affect the financial statements. One of the
Companys most critical estimates is the capitalization of
software development costs. Due to the inherent nature of these
estimates, the Company cannot provide absolute assurance that it
will not significantly increase or decrease such estimates upon
determination of the actual results. Any required adjustments
could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its
results of operations, and could result in the restatement of
the Companys prior period financial statements.
Changes
in accounting standards could impact the Companys reported
earnings and financial condition.
The accounting standard setters, including the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and other regulatory bodies, periodically
change the financial accounting and reporting standards that
govern the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and
can materially impact how the Company records and reports its
financial condition and results of operations. In some cases,
the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard
retroactively, which could result in the restatement of the
Companys prior period financial statements.
Failure
to improve and maintain the quality of internal controls over
financial reporting could materially and adversely affect the
Companys ability to provide timely and accurate financial
information about the Company.
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements
for the Companys fiscal year end, management conducted a
review of the internal control structure over financial
reporting. No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses
were identified. However, management cannot be certain that
deficiencies will not arise in the future or be identified or
that the Company will be able to correct and maintain adequate
controls over financial processes and reporting in the future.
Any failure to maintain adequate controls or to adequately
implement required new or improved controls could harm operating
results or cause failure to meet reporting obligations in a
timely and accurate manner.
Foreign
currency risk
In connection with the Companys expansion into foreign
markets, the Company is a receiver of currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. Accordingly, changes in the exchange rates,
and in particular a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, will
negatively affect the Companys net sales and gross margins
as expressed in U.S. dollars. There is also a risk that the
Company will have to adjust local currency product pricing due
to competitive pressures when there has been significant
volatility in foreign currency exchange rates.
These
risks are not exhaustive.
Other sections of this
Form 10-K
may include additional factors which could adversely impact the
Companys business and financial performance. Moreover, the
Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing
environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is
not possible for the Companys management to predict all
risk factors, nor can the Company assess the impact of all
factors on the Companys business or the extent to which
any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results
to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as
a prediction of actual results.
20
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None
Streamline Healths principal offices are located at 10200
Alliance Road, Suite 200, Cincinnati,
OH 45242-4716.
The offices consist of approximately 21,700 square feet of
space under a lease that expires in July 2010. In addition,
Streamline Health leases dedicated collocation high security
data center space in the Cincinnati, OH area, for its hosting
services, hosting center operations, which lease expires in June
2010, but has automatic renewal provisions. The current rental
expense for all of these facilities approximates $400,000
annually.
Streamline Health believes that its facilities are adequate for
its current needs and that suitable alternative space is
available to accommodate expansion of Streamline Healths
operations. The Company is currently discussing lease options
for its corporate office with potential landlords including its
current landlord.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Streamline Health is, from time to time, a party to various
legal proceedings and claims, which arise, in the ordinary
course of business. Streamline Health is not aware of any legal
matters that will have a material adverse effect on Streamline
Healths consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The names, ages, and positions held by the Executive Officers of
Streamline Health on April 16, 2010 are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Appointed as
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(1)
|
|
Executive Officer(2)
|
|
J. Brian Patsy
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
|
|
|
1989
|
|
Gary M. Winzenread
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Product Development and Strategy
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Joseph O. Brown, II
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President Administrative Services and Chief Information
Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
B. Scott Boyden, Jr.
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Donald E. Vick, Jr.
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Controller, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Interim Treasurer
and Interim Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All current officers of Streamline Health hold office until
their successors are elected and qualified or until any removal
or resignation. Officers of Streamline Health are elected by the
Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. For
purposes of the descriptions of the background of Streamline
Healths Executive Officers, the term Company
refers to both Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. and its
predecessors LanVision Systems, Inc. and LanVision, Inc. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents date of appointment to Registrant or its predecessor. |
J. Brian Patsy is a founder of the Company and has served
as the President and a Director since Streamline Healths
inception in October 1989. Mr. Patsy was appointed Chief
Executive Officer in March 1996, and served as Chairman of the
Board until May 2009. Prior to founding Streamline Health,
Mr. Patsy served in various executive, management and
engineering capacities with Wang Laboratories, AT&T,
Ameritch, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company and the National
Security Agency. Mr. Patsy has over 37 years of
experience in the information technology industry.
Mr. Patsy received a Masters of Business Administration
from Kent State University with a
21
major in Finance and Economics in 1976, and a Bachelor of
Science Degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of
Akron in 1973.
Gary M. Winzenread joined the Company in 2007 as the Director of
Product Strategy and shortly thereafter assumed responsibility
for Product Development as well. Mr. Winzenread was a
consultant to Streamline Health in 2007, and prior to that spent
8 years as the President and CEO of Praxis Solutions, the
software development consultancy he founded in 1998. As CEO of
Praxis, he led the company through many years of growth over 50%
per annum to a 40 person consultancy he successfully sold
in 2004 to Number Six Software of McLean, VA, with whom he
stayed in executive capacities through 2006.
Joseph O. Brown, II joined the Company in 1991 as Director
of Information Technology. In 1998 Mr. Brown assumed
responsibility for the formation and operation of the
Application Hosting Operations known as ASPeN. In 2000 he was
appointed Chief Information Officer, and in 2007 was elected a
Vice President with responsibility for ASPeN, as well as
assuming responsibility for Product Support and Client
Professional Services. In early 2009, Mr. Brown assumed the
title of Vice President Consulting Services and Chief
Information Officer. Early in 2010 Mr. Browns title
was changed to Vice President Administrative Services and CIO.
Prior to joining Streamline Health, Mr. Brown served with
the U.S. Marine Corps as a Data Systems Officer.
Mr. Brown has over 23 years of experience in the
information technology industry.
B. Scott Boyden, Jr. joined the Company in 2008 as
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Boyden
has assumed all responsibilities for managing and directing the
sales and marketing activities of Streamline Health.
Mr. Boyden has more than 20 years of senior-level
sales, marketing and executive management experience in the
healthcare industry. He has built and led winning sales teams at
both regional and national levels and has a prior background of
top sales performance himself. Most recently he served as the
area vice president of sales for Misys Healthcare Systems, where
he enjoyed a successful 10 year career, and was recognized
as a top sales leader and performer contributing over
$100 million of sales revenue. Mr. Boydens
employment agreement will expire on June 30, 2010. The
Company has informed him that his agreement will not be renewed.
Donald E. Vick, Jr. joined the Company in 1997, as
Assistant Controller. In 2002, he was appointed Controller and
Assistant Treasurer. In 2005 he was also appointed Assistant
Secretary. In 2008, he was appointed Interim Chief Financial
Officer, Interim Treasurer, and Interim Corporate Secretary.
Prior to joining Streamline Health, Mr. Vick served as
Assistant Controller of Cincom Systems, Inc., an international
software development and marketing company. Mr. Vick is a
Certified Public Accountant.
There are no family relationships between any Director or
Executive Officer and any other Director or Executive Officer of
the Registrant.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
Market
For Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities
|
(a) The Companys Common Stock trades on the Capital
Market tier of The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol STRM.
The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices for
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. Common Stock for each of the
quarters in fiscal years 2009 and 2008, as reported by The
NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
4th Quarter (November 1, 2009 through January 31, 2010)
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
3rd Quarter (August 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009)
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
2nd Quarter (May 1, 2009 through July 31, 2009)
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
1st Quarter (February 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009)
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
4th Quarter (November 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009)
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
3rd Quarter (August 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
2nd Quarter (May 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008)
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
1st Quarter (February 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008)
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
The market price of the Common Stock could be subject to
significant fluctuations based on factors such as announcements
of new products or customers by Streamline Health or its
competitors, quarterly fluctuations in Streamline Healths
financial results or other competitors financial results,
changes in analysts estimates of Streamline Healths
financial performance, general conditions in the healthcare
information technology industry and conditions in the financial
markets. In addition, the stock market, in general, has
experienced price and volume fluctuations which have
particularly affected the market price of high technology
companies and which have been often unrelated to the operating
performance of a specific company. Many technology companies,
including Streamline Health, experience significant fluctuations
in the market price of their equity securities. There can be no
assurance that the market price of the Common Stock will not
decline, or otherwise continue to experience significant
fluctuations in the future.
(b) According to the stock transfer agents records,
Streamline Health had 180 stockholders of record as of
April 6, 2010. Because brokers and other institutions on
behalf of stockholders hold many of such shares, Streamline
Health is unable to determine with complete accuracy the current
total number of stockholders represented by these record
holders. Streamline Health estimates that it has approximately
2,600 stockholders, based on information provided by the
Companys stock transfer agent from their search of
individual participants in security position listings.
(c) Streamline Health has not paid any cash dividends on
its Common Stock since its inception and does not intend to pay
any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
23
MARKET
PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCK MATERS
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return
on Common Stock with the cumulative total return on the NASDAQ
U.S. Total Return Index and on the NASDAQ Computer and Data
Processing Services Stock Index for the period commencing
January 31, 2005 and ending January 31, 2010, assuming
an investment of $100 and the reinvestment of any dividends.
The comparison in the graph below is based upon historical data
and is not indicative of, nor intended to forecast the future
performance of Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/31/051
|
|
1/31/061
|
|
1/31/071
|
|
1/31/081
|
|
1/31/091
|
|
1/31/101
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. Common Stock
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
228.01
|
|
|
$
|
183.71
|
|
|
$
|
86.32
|
|
|
$
|
57.33
|
|
|
$
|
71.99
|
|
NASDAQ U.S. Total Return Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
112.50
|
|
|
$
|
120.66
|
|
|
$
|
115.89
|
|
|
$
|
57.60
|
|
|
$
|
83.33
|
|
NASDAQ Computer and Data Processing Services Stock Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
112.10
|
|
|
$
|
124.44
|
|
|
$
|
130.34
|
|
|
$
|
81.47
|
|
|
$
|
127.91
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Assumes that $100.00 was invested on January 31, 2005 in
Common Stock at the closing price of $3.07 per share and at the
closing sales price of each index on that date and that all
dividends were reinvested. No dividends have been declared on
Common Stock. Stockholder returns over the indicated period
should not be considered indicative of future stockholder
returns. |
The information required above by Item 201(e) of
Regulation S-K
is not considered filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and should not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
24
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth consolidated financial data with
respect to Streamline Health for each of the five years in the
period ended January 31, 2010. The information set forth
below should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year(1)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues(2)
|
|
$
|
18,208
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
|
$
|
16,684
|
|
|
$
|
15,961
|
|
|
$
|
16,185
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
16,855
|
|
|
|
17,632
|
|
|
|
17,388
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
14,447
|
|
Operating profit
(loss)(3)
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
Net earnings
(loss)(3 &
4)
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share of Common stock
|
|
|
.14
|
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.28
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share of Common stock
|
|
|
.14
|
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
(.08
|
)
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.27
|
|
Shares used in computing basic per share data
|
|
|
9,381
|
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
|
|
9,234
|
|
|
|
9,195
|
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted per share data
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
|
|
9,234
|
|
|
|
9,722
|
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of the year):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
2,189
|
|
|
$
|
3,317
|
|
|
$
|
4,634
|
|
Working capital (deficit)
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
17,525
|
|
|
|
16,732
|
|
|
|
16,099
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
8,731
|
|
|
|
7,097
|
|
|
|
8,193
|
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year of
Streamline Health commencing February 1 of that calendar year
and ending on January 31 of the following year. |
|
(2) |
|
During fiscal 2008, the Company revised its historical financial
statements to reclassify revenue and costs related to certain
maintenance services. During a review of the accounting
treatment of its revenue recognition policies, the Company
determined that certain revisions to the accounting treatment of
its revenue recognition for royalty commissions paid to GE
Healthcare were necessary. The selected financial data presented
above reflect the revised amounts. |
|
(3) |
|
Operating profit (loss) and net earnings (loss) includes a
$100,000, $100,000, and $41,000 reduction in reserves due to
changes in estimates, in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in 2005 includes a tax benefit of $897,000 relating
to the reduction in the valuation allowances for the deferred
tax assets relating to the net operating loss carry forward
based upon reasonable future earnings before income tax
projections. |
25
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of
Operations
|
See also PART 1, ITEM 1, BUSINESS for general and
specific descriptions of Streamline Healths business.
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Company
Initiatives and Strategy
In 2009, the Company established a new division to take
advantage of what we believe is a significant growth opportunity
to provide customized document workflow solutions and Business
Process Management (or BPM) consulting services. Many industry
consultants, including Gartner Research, believe healthcare
organizations face an ever increasing demand to improve business
processes and reduce costs, especially in the current economic
climate. Business Process Management is a proven discipline
which allows organizations to improve their business operations
by identifying, automating and optimizing existing
labor-intensive business processes that cause bottlenecks and
inefficiencies.
BPM solutions are quickly rising to the top of technology
spending priorities across many healthcare organizations. A CIO
study by HIMSS Analytics placed BPM solutions as the number two
spending priority on corporate IT budgets. Additionally,
according to Forrester Research, by 2011 the global market for
BPM solutions is expected to reach $6.3 billion. This is a
significant increase from the under $1 billion produced in
2006.
The Company has already created and installed numerous custom
workflow-based BPM solutions, referred to as Streamline
Optimization Solutions, or SOS, at several existing customer
locations, enabling them to streamline their Patient Financial
Services, Human Resources and administrative document-centric
processes.
Streamline Healths objective is to continue to be a
leading provider of health information management, Patient
Financial Services, and administrative workflow solutions to the
healthcare industry by providing process integration services
and solutions.
Highlight
Customer Satisfaction
The Company has made significant investment in customer
satisfaction initiatives during fiscal 2009, which will continue
into 2010. The Company has identified the need to better service
our legacy architecture as we transition our existing customer
base to the fifth generation architecture, accessANYware 5.0.
Focus
on Sales and Marketing
As a result of the first delivery and implementation of the
Companys 5th generation architecture, accessANYware
5.0, in 2010 it is anticipated that the Company will shift its
investments in resources from research and development into
additional sales, marketing and implementation resources. The
Company has developed a library of departmental process
optimization solutions that it believes will provide the impetus
for its future growth. Accordingly, the Company will be
investing in additional resources to promote, sell and implement
its portfolio of departmental solutions.
Building
the Recurring Revenue Stream
Streamline Health experienced a significant growth in hosting
services contracts and related backlog of recurring revenue over
the past two fiscal years. The Company is experiencing a
dramatic shift away from its traditional model of licensed,
locally installed software, towards our hosted delivery model. A
desirable byproduct of this dramatic shift to the hosted model
is much better visibility for future revenue streams based on
backlog fulfillment from hosted contracts over typical five year
contract periods, as well as a high percentage of contract
renewals after the initial term.
Factors that we believe have contributed to this significant
shift to the hosted delivery model are:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Hosted services are now becoming more main stream, and market
adoption has increased dramatically over the past few years.
|
26
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Small to mid-sized healthcare organizations do not have the
capital, or the information technology staffs to support
complex, locally installed software.
|
|
|
3.
|
Economic conditions, and reduced access to credit have forced
hospital organizations to reconsider their capital purchases and
look to operating lease alternatives, such as our hosted
services, to meet their software needs.
|
|
|
4.
|
Hosted services are an excellent hedge against future
obsolescence, and provide a lower-risk alternative to
traditional licensed models.
|
Streamline Health now provides hosted services to The Health
Alliance of Greater Cincinnati, Catholic Healthcare West, T. J.
Sampson Community Hospital, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Patty
A. Clay Medical Center, Marion General Medical Center, the
University of California San Francisco (UCSF), Massena
Medical Center, Columbus Ohio Vital Statistics, and
Childrens Medical Center of Columbus, OH, New York
Presbyterian Hospital, and Childrens National Medical
Center, Washington, D.C., among others. In addition,
Streamline Health has licensed its workflow and document
management solutions, which are installed at leading healthcare
providers including Parkview Health, Pro Health Care, Peace
Health, Texas Health Resources, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, the
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Beth Israel Medical Center,
and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, among others.
We believe that the realignment will better focus and position
the company to take advantage of increased market opportunities
for hosted services, particularly at the lower end of the
healthcare market where opportunities for these services is
growing much faster than the marketplace in general. We also
believe that our hosted services provide us with a significant
advantage in the marketplace, as many of our competitors do not
have a comparable offering.
Expand
Distribution Channels
Streamline Health estimates the total market for Streamline
Healths document management solutions and services could
be in excess of $16 billion, and the market is less than
30% penetrated. Streamline Health strongly believes its highly
evolved, secure and technologically advanced web browser-based
hosted applications will position Streamline Health to take
advantage of, what it continues to believe will be,
significantly increasing market opportunities for Streamline
Health and its distribution partners in the future.
Execute
on Product Development Goals
Streamline Health intends to continue its product development
efforts and increase the functionality of existing applications
along with the development of new applications using workflow
technologies. In particular, Streamline Health intends to
increase the functionality of its web-based applications.
Streamline Health has continued to add new features,
functionality and workflow applications to its suite of
products, including revenue cycle management solutions such as
remote coding, remote physician order processing, pre-admission
registration scanning, insurance verification, explanation of
benefits processing, and enterprise compliance solutions.
Streamline Health believes only the most robust, flexible,
dependable solutions will survive in the healthcare market, and
Streamline Health has attempted to establish itself as a leader
in document management and workflow-based solutions through
strong product development.
Continued
Research and Development
Streamline Health continues to focus its research and
development efforts to develop new application software and
increase the functionality of existing applications. Customer
requirements and desires significantly influence Streamline
Healths research and development efforts.
27
Results
of Operations
Fiscal 2009 revenue performance was in line with expectations.
The Company recognized revenues of approximately
$18.2 million, a record for the Company. The revenues
recognized relating to the general availability of accessANYware
5.0, and continued revenue recognition of hosted contracts, were
coupled with targeted expense reductions and phased-in strategic
investments, which were primary contributors to the Company
exceeding its expectations of operating profits in fiscal 2009.
The Company achieved an operating profit of approximately
$1.4 million in fiscal 2009, compared to operating losses
of $1.3 million in fiscal 2008.
The following table sets forth, for each fiscal year indicated,
certain operating data as percentages:
Statement
of Operations(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(2)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Systems sales
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
Services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
Application-hosting services
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(.3
|
)
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
Income tax net benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings(loss)
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of systems sales
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
102.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
44.8
|
%
|
|
|
42.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of application-hosting services
|
|
|
49.7
|
%
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because a significant percentage of the operating costs are
incurred at levels that are not necessarily correlated with
revenue levels, a variation in the timing of systems sales and
installations and the resulting revenue recognition can cause
significant variations in operating results. As a result,
period-to-period
comparisons may not be meaningful with respect to the past
operations nor are they necessarily indicative of the future
operations of Streamline Health in the near or long-term. The
data in the table is presented solely for the purpose of
reflecting the relationship of various operating elements to
revenues for the periods indicated. |
|
(2) |
|
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing on February 1 of that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year. |
Comparison
of fiscal year 2009 with 2008
The approximate net increase in working capital deficit of
$482,000 at January 31, 2010 from January 31, 2009
resulted primarily from the following:
The decrease in cash resulted primarily from significant
increases in accounts receivable net of cash collected, property
and equipment additions, and capitalized software expenditures.
In addition, the timing of vendor payments and deferred revenues
negatively impacted the balance of cash at the end of the fiscal
year.
The net increase of $1,098,000 in accounts and contract
receivables, both current and non-current, is primarily due to
the general release of accessANYware 5.0 and the associated
billed receivables of approximately $760,000. This was coupled
with a net $473,000 increase in billed receivables in the fourth
quarter.
28
The approximate $393,000 increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses at January 31, 2010 from January 31,
2009 is due to compensation accruals, including quarterly
commissions and discretionary bonuses, coupled with the timing
of vendor payments at the end of the fiscal year.
The approximate $1.7 million decrease in deferred revenues
results primarily from revenues recognized in the amount of
$800,000 on one large hosted contract due to acceptance criteria
being met, $240,000 relating to the delivery of accessANYware
5.0 to a Canadian customer, and approximately $600,000 relating
to earned maintenance revenues.
Revenues
Revenues consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended January 31,
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Proprietary software(1)
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
$
|
1,565
|
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Hardware & third party software(1)
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
Professional services(2)
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Maintenance & support(2)
|
|
|
7,520
|
|
|
|
7,331
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Application hosting services
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
18,208
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Proprietary software and hardware are the components of the
system sales line item |
|
(2) |
|
Professional services and maintenance & support are
the components of the service, maintenance and support line
item. This includes BPM consulting services. |
Total revenues for fiscal year 2009 were $18,208,000 compared
with revenues of $16,286,000 in fiscal year 2008, an increase of
approximately $1,923,000, or 12%. The increase is attributable
to the software and other services revenue recognized which are
associated with the delivery of accessANYware 5.0 to a Canadian
customer, and coupled with increases in application hosting
revenues and professional services. In addition, the
Companys increased application hosting is primarily due to
several newer hosted customer projects reaching acceptance
criteria by the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Revenues from new
hosted customer agreements entered into since July of fiscal
2008 continue to incrementally roll out in fiscal 2009.
Proprietary software Revenues from
software sales in fiscal year 2009 were $2,438,000, an increase
of $873,000, or 56% from fiscal 2008. This increase was the
result of approximately $1.7 million in software revenues
recognized, net of foreign currency adjustments, relative to the
general availability and delivery of accessANYware 5.0 to a
Canadian customer. This was offset by decreased spending on new
proprietary software by our existing customers.
Hardware and third party software
Revenues from hardware and third party software sales in fiscal
2009 were $1,236,000, a decrease of $448,000, or 27% from fiscal
2008. The decrease in hardware and third party software revenue
in fiscal 2009 is primarily attributable to a decrease in
upgrades from the existing customer base in fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008.
Maintenance and support Revenues from
maintenance, and support in fiscal year 2009 were $7,520,000, an
increase of $189,000, or 3% from fiscal 2008. The increase in
maintenance and support results from the addition of new
customers, expansion of existing systems by customers, and
scheduled annual increases for renewals.
Professional services Revenues from
professional services in fiscal year 2009 were $3,713,000, an
increase of $919,000, or 33% from fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2008,
the Company entered into several application-hosting services
contracts for which the customer acceptance provisions within
that contract caused professional services revenue to be
deferred until all customer acceptance provisions were met. The
professional services revenues recognized due to customer
milestones being met contributed to the large increase, along
with a continued high demand for professional services from our
customer base.
29
Application hosting Revenues from
application-hosting services were $3,301,000 or an increase of
$389,000, or 14% from fiscal 2008. This increase is attributable
to an increase in the number of hosting customers. Revenues from
new hosted customer agreements entered into since July of fiscal
2008 continue to roll out in fiscal 2009, fueling increases in
the recurring hosted revenue stream.
Revenues from remarketing partners
Total revenues from GE were $5,639,000, or 31% in fiscal year
2009 as compared to $6,069,000, or 37% in fiscal 2008. Revenues
in fiscal 2009 were primarily derived of $644,000 for hardware
and third party software sales, $519,000 for Streamline Health
software, $1,174,000 for professional services, $2,877,000 for
maintenance and support revenues, and $425,000 of hosting
revenues. Streamline Health relies on GE Healthcare for a
significant amount of its revenues, the loss of which would have
a material adverse affect on future results of operations.
Total revenues from Telus Health were $2,071,000 in fiscal year
2009, or 11% of total revenues. Revenues were primarily derived
of $1,712,000 for Streamline Health software, and $297,000 for
professional services. Remaining recognized revenues were from
hardware & third party software, and system
maintenance.
In fiscal year 2009, three customers accounted for 19% of the
total revenues, compared to 25% in fiscal year 2008, exclusive
of our remarketing partners. A substantial portion of fiscal
year total 2009 revenues came from fulfillment of backlog and
add-on business, primarily expansion and upgrades and a large
new customer in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Cost
of Sales
Cost of sales consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended January 31,
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of system sales
|
|
$
|
2,993
|
|
|
$
|
3,328
|
|
|
$
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
Cost of services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Cost of application hosting
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
$
|
9,668
|
|
|
$
|
8,865
|
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales consists of cost of systems sales, cost of
services, maintenance and support, and cost of
application-hosting services. Cost of systems sales includes
amortization of capitalized software expenditures, royalties,
and the cost of third-party hardware and software. Cost of
systems sales, as a percentage of systems sales, varies from
period-to-period
depending on hardware and software configurations of the systems
sold. The cost of systems sales as a percentage of associated
revenues in fiscal year 2009 and 2008 were 82% and 102%,
respectively. The decrease in the cost of sales is primarily the
result of the reduced hardware and third party software sales
and the associated direct costs. Cost of systems sales as a
percentage of systems sales may vary from
period-to-period
depending on hardware and software configurations of the systems
sold or add-on sales delivered. The relatively fixed cost of the
capitalized software amortization compared to the variable
nature of system sales each quarter causes these percentages to
vary dramatically, especially in those periods where systems
sales are low.
Cost of services, maintenance and support as a percentage of
services, maintenance and support revenues in 2009 and 2008 were
45% and 43%, respectively. The cost of services, maintenance and
support includes compensation and benefits for support and
professional services personnel and the cost of third party
maintenance contracts. These increases are due to primarily the
increased professional services staffing costs and third party
maintenance contract costs associated with supporting an
increased customer base, and specifically the startup costs of
the BPM services.
The cost of application-hosting services in 2009 and 2008 as a
percentage of revenues was 50% and 42%, respectively. The cost
of application-hosting services operations is relatively fixed,
but subject to inflation for the goods and services it requires.
The increase is primarily attributable to increased depreciation
and third party license and maintenance expenses as a result of
the growing hosting center operations.
30
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended January 31,
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands):
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
$
|
5,504
|
|
|
$
|
6,503
|
|
|
$
|
(999
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative expenses consist primarily
of compensation and related benefits and reimbursable travel and
living expenses related to the Companys sales, marketing
and administrative personnel; advertising and marketing
expenses, including trade shows and similar type sales and
marketing expenses; and general corporate expenses, including
occupancy costs. Selling, General and Administrative expenses in
fiscal 2009 and 2008 as a percentage of revenues were 30% and
40%, respectively. This decrease over the respective comparable
prior periods is due to effective cost management measures begun
in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 including; planned
reductions in sales and administrative expenses, and strategic
hiring and employee compensation structures since the reduction
in sales force during fiscal 2008. The Company has been able to
capitalize on the efficiencies gained by improving the
allocation of resources, and reducing expenses.
Product
Research and Development Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended January 31,
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands):
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
2,264
|
|
|
$
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product research and development expenses consist primarily of
compensation and related benefits; the use of independent
contractors for specific near-term development projects; and an
allocated portion of general overhead costs, including
occupancy. Research and development expenses in fiscal 2009 and
2008, as a percentage of revenues, were 9% and 14%,
respectively. While software capitalization remained relatively
constant, the decrease in the percentage of research and
development expense to revenue was attributable to cost cutting
measures, which decreased research and development expenses not
eligible for capitalization in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Operating
Profit (loss)
The Company achieved an operating profit of $1,354,000 in fiscal
2009, compared to a operating loss of $1,347,000 in fiscal 2008.
Significant revenues recognized relating to the general
availability of accessANYware 5.0 and the continued revenue
recognition of hosted contracts; which were coupled with
targeted expense reductions and efficiency initiatives,
contributed to improved operating profits.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest income in fiscal 2009 was $0 compared $8,000 in fiscal
2008. Interest income consists primarily of interest on cash
balances. The interest income declined during 2009 because of
lower cash balances and lower interest rates. Interest expense
in 2009 was related to the working capital facility interest and
fees, along with accrued interest for the capital lease.
Interest expense from the working capital facility was $42,000
in fiscal 2009 compared with $24,000 in fiscal 2008. The
increase in the interest expense in 2009 results primarily from
a larger average balance outstanding than in fiscal 2008.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The tax provision in fiscal 2009 is comprised of Federal
alternative minimum tax, and state taxes. The tax provision in
2008 is primarily state provisions.
31
Net
Earnings (loss)
The Company achieved net earnings of $1,288,000 in fiscal 2009,
compared to a net loss of $1,375,000 in fiscal 2008. Significant
revenues recognized relating to accessANYware 5.0 and hosted
contracts, and strategic spending allowed for significantly
improved earnings in fiscal 2009.
Backlog
At January 31, 2010 Streamline Health has master agreements
and purchase orders from customers and remarketing partners for
systems and related services (excluding support and maintenance,
and transaction-based application-hosting revenues), which have
not been delivered or installed which, if fully performed, would
generate future revenues of approximately $4,454,000 compared
with $6,559,000 at January 31, 2009. The related systems
and services are expected to be delivered over the next two to
three years. The decrease in the backlog is the result of fewer
contracts entered into during fiscal 2009 and further
recognition of the professional services related to fiscal 2008
contracts. The $201,000 Streamline Health software component of
this backlog declined from the prior year of $1,027,000 due to
the recognition of the revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009, for the delivery of accessANYware 5.0 to a Canadian
customer. At January 31, 2010, Streamline Health had
maintenance agreements purchase orders, from customers and
remarketing partners for maintenance, which if fully performed,
will generate future revenues of approximately $5,987,000
compared with $6,578,000 at January 31, 2009, through their
respective renewal dates in fiscal year 2010 and 2011. The
decrease results primarily from the recognition in fiscal 2009
of maintenance revenue from one long term maintenance contract
for one large customer. At January 31, 2010, Streamline
Health has entered into hosting agreements, which are expected
to generate revenues in excess of $9,414,000 through their
respective renewal dates in fiscal years 2010 through 2014. The
application-hosting backlog decreased from the $13,043,000 at
January 31, 2009, due to the decreased volume of new
hosting business and renewals, and recognized revenues from
contracts signed in fiscal 2008.
Below is a summary of the backlog at January 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010
|
|
|
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
Streamline Health Software Licenses
|
|
$
|
201,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,027,000
|
|
Custom Software
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
278,000
|
|
Hardware and Third Party Software
|
|
|
171,000
|
|
|
|
562,000
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
3,977,000
|
|
|
|
4,691,000
|
|
Application Hosting Services
|
|
|
9,414,000
|
|
|
|
13,043,000
|
|
Recurring Maintenance
|
|
|
5,987,000
|
|
|
|
6,578,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
19,855,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,179,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streamline Health believes a greater percentage of its future
revenues will come from remarketing agreements with, GE
Healthcare, and other HIS related vendors such as the Telus
Health agreement that was entered into in December 2007.
Streamline Health continues to actively pursue remarketing
agreements with other companies.
The commencement of revenue recognition varies depending on the
size and complexity of the system; the implementation schedule
requested by the customer and usage by customers of the
application-hosting services. Therefore, it is difficult for the
Company to accurately predict the revenue it expects to achieve
in any particular period. Streamline Healths master
agreements generally provide that the customer may terminate its
agreement upon a material breach by Streamline Health, or may
delay certain aspects of the installation. There can be no
assurance that a customer will not cancel all or any portion of
a master agreement or delay installations. A termination or
installation delay of one or more phases of an agreement, or the
failure of Streamline Health to procure additional agreements,
could have a material adverse effect on Streamline Healths
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Outlook
for 2010
As current customers and new prospects review their needs for
enhancement of their current enterprise wide systems, the
Company expects to see an increased demand for departmental
workflow solutions, and custom
32
workflow consulting offerings. The Company expects to also see
growth in our remarketing relationships. Declines in purchased
software can have an adverse affect on our short term earnings.
However, increases in hosted agreements create a baseline of
recurring revenues that lessen large changes in earnings from
year to year. The Company also intends to continue with targeted
spending and cost efficiency measures implemented in fiscal 2008
and 2009, into fiscal 2010. The Company expects the
capitalization of software development costs to decrease in
2010, due to the completion of the first major release of
accessANYware 5.0 in January 2010. Likewise, the Company is
expected to incur amortization expenses in excess of
$3.4 million in fiscal 2010 relating to the capitalized
software development costs for accessANYware 5.0 beginning to
amortize due to its general availability in January 2010.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies
Streamline Healths discussion and analysis of its
financial condition and results of operations are based upon its
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires Streamline Health to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities.
On an on-going basis, Streamline Health evaluates its estimates,
including those related to product revenues, bad debts,
capitalized software development costs, income taxes, warranty
obligations, support contracts, contingencies and litigation.
Streamline Health bases its estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that Streamline Health believes
are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities and revenue recognition. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Streamline Health believes the following critical accounting
policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company derives revenue from the licensing and sale of
systems, either directly to end-users or through third-party
resellers, comprising of internally developed software,
third-party software and hardware components; product support,
maintenance and professional services. The Company also sells
the software application through hosting services which also
provide high quality, transaction or subscription based document
imaging/management services from a central data center.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with
ASC 985-605,
Software-Revenue Recognition and
ASC 605-25
Revenue Recognition Multiple-element
arrangements. The Company commences revenue recognition when
the following criteria all have been met:
|
|
|
|
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
|
|
|
|
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
|
|
|
|
The arrangement fees are fixed or determinable, and
|
|
|
|
Collection is considered probable
|
If the Company determines that any of the above criteria has not
been met, the Company will defer recognition of the revenue
until all the criteria have been met.
Multiple Element Arrangements In arrangements
that include multiple elements (e.g., proprietary software,
other third party hardware and software components,
post-contract customer support (PCS) installation services,
and/or
training), the Company allocates the total revenue to be earned
under the arrangement to the elements based on their relative
fair value of vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), which
is based on the price charged when that element is sold
separately. The amounts representing the fair value of VSOE of
the undelivered items such as PCS are deferred until delivered,
or recognized pro rata over the service contract, which is
typically one year.
Software License Arrangements The Company
utilizes the residual method to recognize software license fees
provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Under the residual method, the difference
33
between the fair value of VSOE of the undelivered elements and
the total arrangement fee is recognized as the license fee upon
delivery. The revenue related to the undelivered elements are
deferred until delivered
and/or
recognized pro rata over the term that the related service
contract.
Billings to customers recorded prior to the recognition of
revenues are classified as deferred revenues. Revenues
recognized prior to progress billings to customers are recorded
as contract receivables.
Each contract is reviewed quarterly by management to determine
the appropriateness of the revenue recognition criteria applied
to the individual contracts based upon the most currently
available information as to the status of the contract, the
customer comments, if any, and the status of any open or
unresolved issues with the customer.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts and contract receivables are comprised of amounts owed
Streamline Health for licensed software, professional services,
including maintenance services and application-hosting services.
Contracts with individual customers and resellers determine when
receivables are due and payable. In determining the allowance
for doubtful accounts, each unpaid receivable greater than
ninety days old is reviewed monthly to determine the payment
status based upon the most currently available information as to
the status of the receivables, the customer comments, if any,
and the status of any open or unresolved issues with the
customer preventing the payment thereof. In addition, the
financial status of current customers is reviewed monthly to
determine the customers ability to pay their outstanding
balance. Corrective action, if necessary, is taken by the
Company to resolve open issues related to unpaid receivables.
During these monthly reviews, Streamline Health determines the
required allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the unwillingness or inability of its customers
or resellers to make required payments. If the financial
condition of the Companys customers or resellers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances may be required. The
Companys customers typically have been well-established
hospitals, medical facilities, or major Healthcare Information
Systems companies that resell Streamline Health products, which
have good credit histories, and payments have been received
within normal time frames for the industry. However, some
healthcare facilities have experienced significant operating
losses and limited cash resources as a result of limits on
third-party reimbursements from insurance companies and
governmental entities. Extended payment of receivables is not
uncommon from such healthcare facilities.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with
ASC 985-20
Software Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or
Marketed. Costs associated with the planning and designing
phase of software development, including coding and testing
activities necessary to establish technological feasibility are
classified as product
34
research and development and are expensed as incurred. Once
technological feasibility has been determined, a portion of the
costs incurred in development, including coding, testing, and
product quality assurance, are capitalized until available for
general release to customers, and subsequently reported at the
lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value.
Amortization is calculated on a
product-by-product
basis and is over the estimated economic life of the software,
typically three years, using the straight-line method.
Amortization commences immediately following when a product is
available for general release to customers. Unamortized
capitalized costs determined to be in excess of the net
realizable value of a product are expensed at the date of such
determination.
Streamline Health reviews, on an on-going basis, the carrying
value of its capitalized software development expenditures, net
of accumulated amortization. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company expensed approximately $408,000 for partial impairment
on a specific workflow product that had been under development
for the past few years. The capitalized costs relating to this
product were written down to its expected net realizable value
based upon the current future sales estimates at
January 31, 2009. There was no impairment recognized in
fiscal 2009.
Streamline Health believes that to replicate its existing
software would cost significantly more than the stated net book
value of $8,049,000 at January 31, 2010. Over the last
three years, Streamline Health has spent approximately
$17,080,000 in research and development, of which $10,000,000,
or 59%, has been capitalized. Amortization of capitalized
software expenditures during the last three years has amounted
to approximately $5,704,000 or a net increase in capitalized
software of approximately $4,296,000 during the last three
years. Many of the programs related to capitalized software
development continue to have significant value to Streamline
Healths current solutions and those under development, as
the concepts, ideas, and software code are readily transferable
and are incorporated into new products.
Equity
Awards Stock-Based Compensation
The Company records equity award expenses in accordance with
ASC 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation, which requires the expensing of the fair value
of the equity award on a straight line basis, over the vesting
period. Future grants of equity awards could have a material
impact on reported expenses depending upon the number, value and
vesting period of future awards.
The fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of
grants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the
following weighted average assumptions of the risk-free interest
rate, dividend yield, volatility factor of the expected market
price of Streamline Healths common stock, the expected
life of stock options and a forfeiture rate. We currently
estimate volatility by using the historical volatility of our
common stock. The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield
currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues
with a remaining term equal to the expected term input to the
Black-Scholes model. We estimate forfeitures using a historical
forfeiture rate.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the provisions of
ASC 740, Income Taxes. Assumptions and estimates are
used in determining the appropriate amount of expense to record
for income taxes. These assumptions and estimates consider the
taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates as well as
current tax regulations. Accruals are established for estimates
of tax effects for certain transactions, credits, and future
projected profitability of our businesses based on our
interpretation of existing facts and circumstances. If these
assumptions and estimates were to change as a result of new
evidence or changes in circumstances, the change in estimate
could result in a material adjustment to the consolidated
financial statements. In fiscal 2007, the changes to the
Companys reserve for uncertain tax positions yielded a
$28,000 adjustment to increase the beginning balance of retained
earnings on the Companys fiscal 2008 balance sheet. The
Company believes that its income tax positions and deductions
will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate adjustments
that will result in a material change to its financial position
during the next twelve months. Therefore, no reserves for
uncertain tax positions have been recorded as of
January 31, 2010.
A key assumption in the determination of the recognized tax
benefit or (provision) is the amount of the valuation allowance
required to reduce the related deferred tax assets. A valuation
allowance reduces the deferred
35
tax assets to a level which will, more likely than not, be
realized. Whether the deferred tax assets will be realized
depends on the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which the deferred tax asset become deductible. The
net deferred tax assets reflect managements estimate of
the amount which will, more likely than not, reduce future
taxable income.
Fair
Value Measurements
The Company determines fair value measurements using the fair
value hierarchy which distinguishes between (1) market
participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained
from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an
entitys own assumptions about market participant
assumptions developed based on the best information available
(unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of
three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities (level 1) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3).
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Traditionally, Streamline Health has funded its operations,
working capital needs, and capital expenditures primarily from a
combination of cash generated by operations, bank loans, and
revolving lines of credit. Streamline Healths liquidity is
dependent upon numerous factors including: (i) the timing
and amount of revenues and collection of contractual amounts
from customers, (ii) amounts invested in research and
development, capital expenditures, and (iii) the level of
operating expenses, all of which can vary significantly from
quarter-to-quarter.
Streamline Healths customers typically have been
well-established hospitals or medical facilities or major HIS
companies that resell Streamline Health products, which
have good credit histories and payments have been received
within normal time frames for the industry. However, some
healthcare organizations have experienced significant operating
losses as a result of limits on third-party reimbursements from
insurance companies and governmental entities. Agreements with
customers often involve significant amounts and contract terms
typically require customers to make progress payments. Current
economic events, as well as the uncertainty in the credit
markets, have adversely affected the availability of financing
for some of our customers. These recent events, to date, have
not materially impacted the quality of our accounts receivable
balances or our ability to access our Working Capital Facility.
Streamline Health has no significant obligations for capital
resources, other than the $900,000 borrowed under its bank line
of credit at January 31, 2010, and the non-cancelable
operating leases of approximately $329,000 payable over the next
four years, and $461,000 for capital leases. Capital
expenditures for property and equipment in 2010 are not expected
to exceed $1,000,000. Streamline Health capitalized
approximately $3,668,000 and 3,680,000 in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Research and development expense, net of
capitalized software development expenditures, was $1,683,000
and $2,264,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net cash provided by operations in fiscal 2009 was approximately
$2,100,000, a decrease of approximately $2,500,000 from
approximately $4,600,000 in the prior fiscal year. The relative
decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in cash provided
from accounts, contracts and installment receivables of
$3,613,000, decreased cash from deferred revenues of $3,770,000,
decrease in cash used from accounts payable and accrued expenses
of $1,484,000 and offset by decrease in cash used in other
prepaid assets of $553,000. See the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the individual components comprising the net cash
provided by operating activities.
During the last two years, Streamline Health has provided
significant net cash outlays for capital expenditures, sales and
marketing investments, product research and development
investments, support and consulting investments, and made net
debt repayments of approximately $3,000,000. Accordingly, to
position the Company to achieve consistent and increasing
revenues and profitability, the Company has begun to shift away
from traditional software license sales towards a focus on
application hosting sales. This shift creates a cash flow
deficiency in the early years of the hosted contract life as
cash payments for the service are received over the life of the
hosted contract. To combat this, the Company has selectively and
prudently reallocated expenses away from development efforts and
invested in sales and marketing resources and talent that is
expected to produce improved results in fiscal 2010. The Company
has also made a significant reinvestment in customer support
efforts for the transition to accessANYware 5.0, and
enhancements in the support of the existing accessANYware
customers. The Company
36
views these reallocations of resources as essential to the
future short term and long term success of the company, however
there can be no assurance that these investments will achieve
their stated goals.
At January 31, 2010, Streamline Health had cash on hand of
$1,025,000. Streamline Health believes that its present cash
position, combined with cash generation currently anticipated
from operations, the availability of the revolving credit
facility, and possible access to new funding sources will be
sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements for the next
twelve months. However, continued expansion of the Company will
require additional resources. The Company may need to incur
debt, obtain an additional infusion of capital, or a combination
of both, depending on the extent of the expansion of the Company
and future revenues and expenses. However, there can be no
assurance Streamline Health will be able to do so. The Company
is evaluating financing options available to the Company.
Notwithstanding the current levels of revenues and expenses, for
the foreseeable future, Streamline Health will need to
continually assess its revenue prospects compared to its then
current expenditure levels. If it does not appear likely that
revenues will increase, it may be necessary to reduce operating
expenses or raise cash through additional borrowings, the sale
of assets, or other equity financing. Certain of these actions
will require current lender approval. However, there can be no
assurance Streamline Health will be successful in any of these
efforts. If it is necessary to significantly reduce operating
expenses, this could have an adverse effect on future operating
performance.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table details the remaining future minimum
obligations, by fiscal year, as of the end of fiscal 2009 for
all contractual obligations. There are no other contractual
obligations beyond fiscal year 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Revolving note
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
328,759
|
|
|
|
261,844
|
|
|
|
43,125
|
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
4,758
|
|
Capital lease
|
|
|
460,944
|
|
|
|
230,472
|
|
|
|
230,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,689,703
|
|
|
$
|
492,316
|
|
|
$
|
1,173,597
|
|
|
$
|
19,032
|
|
|
$
|
4,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
Capital Facility
On October 21, 2009, Streamline Health entered into an
amended and restated revolving note with Fifth Third Bank,
Cincinnati, OH. The terms of the loan remain the same as set
forth in the revolving note entered into on July 31, 2008,
as amended on January 6, 2009, and October 21, 2009
except as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum principal amount that can be borrowed has increased
to $2,750,000 from the prior maximum amount of $2,000,000;
|
|
|
|
The maturity date of the loan has been extended to
October 1, 2011 from August 1, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
The interest rate on the outstanding principal balance will
accrue at an annual floating rate of interest equal to the
Adjusted Libor Rate (as defined in the revolving note) plus
3.25%;
|
|
|
|
The requirement to maintain certain levels of tangible net worth
has been eliminated.
|
In connection with the entering into of the revised revolving
note, the Company also entered into an amended and restated
continuing guaranty agreement. The terms of the continuing
guaranty agreement remain the same as set forth in the guaranty
agreement entered into on July 31, 2008, as amended on
January 6, 2009, and October 21, 2009 except that the
covenant that formerly required the Company to maintain certain
levels of minimum tangible net worth has been eliminated. The
loan also continues to be secured by a first lien on all of the
assets of the Company pursuant to security agreements entered
into by the Company.
37
Streamline Health was in compliance with all of the loan
covenants at January 31, 2010. The Company pays a
commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility of 0.06%.
The Company had outstanding borrowings of $900,000 as of
January 31, 2010.
For details of the amended notes from previous years, see the
audited financial statements.
Operating
Leases
Streamline Health rents office, data center space and equipment
under non-cancelable operating leases that expire, at various
times, during the next three fiscal years. Streamline Health is
in the process of reviewing its options with respect to its main
corporate office lease which expires in July, 2010.
Capital
Lease
Streamline Health acquired additional computer equipment for the
application hosting services data center in January 2009, which
are accounted for as a capitalized lease. The lease is payable
in monthly installments through the lease term expiring January,
2012.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
Streamline Health does not have any off balance sheet
arrangements as of January 31, 2010.
Contingencies
Streamline Health is, from time to time, a party to various
legal proceedings and claims, which arise, in the ordinary
course of business. Streamline Health is not aware of any legal
matters that will have a material adverse effect on Streamline
Healths consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through
its working capital credit facility with Fifth Third Bank. As of
January 31, 2010, our effective interest rate was 3.50%.
Based on borrowings of $900,000 as of January 31, 2010, for
each percentage point increase in the interest rate, annual
interest expense would increase by less than $10,000. This
analysis uses simplified assumptions such as
across-the-board
increases or decreases in the level of interest rates with no
other subsequent changes for the remainder of the period, and it
does not consider the impact of increases or decreases in the
outstanding debt, which generally occurs throughout the fiscal
year. Therefore, although it gives an indication of the
Companys exposure to changes in interest rates, it is not
intended to predict future results, which may vary significantly.
Currently, the Company does not have any financial instruments
for trading or other speculative purposes or to manage interest
rate exposure.
Streamline Health currently invests its cash balances, in excess
of its current needs in an interest bearing, or bank fee
reduction based, checking account. As such, Streamline Health
does not have any significant market risk exposure at
January 31, 2010.
38
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE COVERED BY
REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they
are not applicable or the required information is included in
the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
39
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. as of January 31, 2010
and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended January 31, 2010 and 2009. In
connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index. These financial statements and schedule are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the financial statements and
schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. at
January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended January 31, 2010 and 2009, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Chicago, Illinois
April 16, 2010
/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
40
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,025,173
|
|
|
$
|
3,128,801
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$100,000
|
|
|
1,922,279
|
|
|
|
1,328,508
|
|
Contract receivables
|
|
|
1,182,308
|
|
|
|
502,373
|
|
Prepaid hardware and third party software for future delivery
|
|
|
149,281
|
|
|
|
681,540
|
|
Prepaid other, including prepaid customer maintenance contracts
|
|
|
1,363,332
|
|
|
|
802,951
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
224,000
|
|
|
|
247,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
5,866,373
|
|
|
|
6,691,173
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
2,987,039
|
|
|
|
2,475,928
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
1,816,397
|
|
|
|
1,405,407
|
|
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
747,867
|
|
|
|
737,344
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
574,257
|
|
|
|
574,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,125,560
|
|
|
|
5,192,936
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,344,432
|
)
|
|
|
(3,625,408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781,128
|
|
|
|
1,567,528
|
|
Contract receivables, less current portion
|
|
|
146,093
|
|
|
|
321,500
|
|
Capitalized software development costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $10,411,828 and $8,311,760, respectively
|
|
|
8,049,292
|
|
|
|
6,481,360
|
|
Other, including deferred taxes of $1,651,000 and $1,628,000,
respectively
|
|
|
1,681,661
|
|
|
|
1,670,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,524,547
|
|
|
$
|
16,732,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
887,928
|
|
|
$
|
759,577
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
559,235
|
|
|
|
299,000
|
|
Accrued other expenses
|
|
|
476,504
|
|
|
|
472,113
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
249,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenues
|
|
|
4,956,303
|
|
|
|
5,941,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,129,279
|
|
|
|
7,472,527
|
|
Deferred revenues, less current portion
|
|
|
602,239
|
|
|
|
1,313,977
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
Capital lease obligation, less current portion
|
|
|
161,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
8,793,184
|
|
|
|
9,635,346
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value per
share, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share,
25,000,000 shares authorized, 9,436,824 and
9,354,782 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
94,368
|
|
|
|
93,548
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
36,160,126
|
|
|
|
35,820,417
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated (deficit)
|
|
|
(27,528,751
|
)
|
|
|
(28,816,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
8,731,363
|
|
|
|
7,097,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,524,547
|
|
|
$
|
16,732,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
41
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems sales
|
|
$
|
3,673,522
|
|
|
$
|
3,249,270
|
|
Services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
11,233,183
|
|
|
|
10,124,829
|
|
Application-hosting services
|
|
|
3,301,493
|
|
|
|
2,911,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
18,208,198
|
|
|
|
16,285,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of systems sales
|
|
|
2,993,442
|
|
|
|
3,327,944
|
|
Cost of services, maintenance and support
|
|
|
5,033,145
|
|
|
|
4,329,026
|
|
Cost of application-hosting services
|
|
|
1,641,576
|
|
|
|
1,207,590
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
5,503,580
|
|
|
|
6,503,465
|
|
Product research and development
|
|
|
1,682,773
|
|
|
|
2,264,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
16,854,516
|
|
|
|
17,632,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
1,353,682
|
|
|
|
(1,346,699
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,865
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(43,823
|
)
|
|
|
(24,436
|
)
|
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
18,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,328,608
|
|
|
|
(1,363,270
|
)
|
Income tax (expense)
|
|
|
(40,500
|
)
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic per common share computation
|
|
|
9,381,285
|
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in diluted per common share computation
|
|
|
9,530,891
|
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
42
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
redeemable
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
paid in
|
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
stockholders
|
|
|
|
preferred stock
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
(deficit)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,603
|
|
|
|
35,542,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,441,889
|
)
|
|
|
8,192,936
|
|
Stock issued to Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
119,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,548
|
|
|
|
35,820,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,816,859
|
)
|
|
|
7,097,106
|
|
Stock issued to Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
65,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,900
|
|
Restricted stock issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,629
|
|
Unrecognized benefit of foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,368
|
|
|
$
|
36,160,126
|
|
|
$
|
5,620
|
|
|
$
|
(27,528,751
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,731,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
43
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings(loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,868,997
|
|
|
|
2,369,670
|
|
Impairment loss on capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,809
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
274,629
|
|
|
|
158,747
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts, contract and installment receivables
|
|
|
(1,098,299
|
)
|
|
|
2,514,313
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
54,664
|
|
|
|
(498,441
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
174,020
|
|
|
|
(759,105
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
264,627
|
|
|
|
(286,697
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
(1,697,272
|
)
|
|
|
2,072,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,133,782
|
|
|
|
4,604,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(698,698
|
)
|
|
|
(794,950
|
)
|
Capitalization of software development costs
|
|
|
(3,668,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,680,000
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(36,612
|
)
|
|
|
(110,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,403,310
|
)
|
|
|
(4,585,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and stock purchase plan
|
|
|
65,900
|
|
|
|
120,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
165,900
|
|
|
|
920,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,103,628
|
)
|
|
|
939,791
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,128,801
|
|
|
|
2,189,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,025,173
|
|
|
$
|
3,128,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
34,507
|
|
|
$
|
23,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
$
|
7,265
|
|
|
$
|
(3,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment additions financed by capital leases
|
|
$
|
410,975
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
44
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATMENTS
|
|
NOTE A
|
ORGANIZATION
AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (Streamline Health
or the Company) operates in one segment as a
provider of Healthcare Information Technology through the
licensing of its Electronic Health Information Management,
Patient Financial Services and other Workflow software
applications and the use of such applications through its
application-hosting services as an Application Service Provider.
Streamline Healths software and services enable hospitals
and integrated healthcare delivery systems in the United States
and Canada to capture, store, manage, route, retrieve, and
process vast amounts of patient clinical, financial and other
healthcare provider information.
Fiscal
Year
All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year
commencing February 1 in that calendar year and ending on
January 31 of the following year.
|
|
NOTE B
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Basis of
Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiary, Streamline
Health, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash demand
deposits. We place our cash deposits in Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured financial
institutions. Cash deposits may exceed FDIC insured levels from
time to time. For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
Receivables
Accounts and contract receivables are comprised of amounts owed
Streamline Health for licensed software, professional services,
including maintenance services and application-hosting services
and are presented net of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The timing of revenue recognition may not coincide with the
billing terms of the customer contract, resulting in unbilled
receivables or deferred revenues; therefore contract receivables
represent revenues recognized prior to customer billings.
Individual contract terms with customers or resellers determine
when receivables are due.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
In determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, aged
receivables are analyzed monthly by management. Each identified
receivable is reviewed based upon the most recent information
available, the customer comments, if any, and the status of any
open or unresolved issues with the customer preventing the
payment thereof. Corrective action, if necessary, is taken by
the Company to resolve open issues related to unpaid
receivables. During these monthly reviews, Streamline Health
determines the required allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the unwillingness or inability
of its customers or resellers to make required payments. The
allowance for doubtful accounts was $100,000 at January 31,
2010 and 2009.
45
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
Other
Current Assets
Other current assets are primarily prepaid insurance,
commissions, maintenance, deposits, deferred Federal income tax
assets and prepaid expenses related to future revenues.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method, over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. Estimated useful lives are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
3-4 years
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Office furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
Term of lease
|
|
In 2005, Streamline Health entered into a sixty-six month
operating lease for office space. In connection with the lease,
the property owner provided certain lease inducements to the
Company, including a $326,000 build out allowance and use of the
premises for six months rent free. The Company has accounted for
the value of these inducements by recording the build out
allowance as a leasehold improvement with a corresponding lease
incentive liability. The total amount of the lease payments are
amortized as rent expense on a straight line basis over the term
of the lease. The leasehold improvement asset and the lease
incentive liability are each amortized on a straight line basis
over the term of the lease to depreciation and as an offset to
rent expense, respectively. Any timing differences between the
actual monthly lease payments and the straight line rent expense
is recorded as an adjustment to the lease incentive liability.
Depreciation expense for property and equipment in fiscal 2009
and 2008 was $769,000 and $701,000, respectively.
Leased computer equipment and software meeting certain criteria
are capitalized and the present value of the related lease
payments is recorded as a liability. Depreciation of the
capitalized lease assets is computed on the straight-line method
over the term of the lease.
Normal repair and maintenance is expensed as incurred.
Replacements are capitalized and the property and equipment
accounts are relieved of the items being replaced or disposed
of, or if no longer of value. The related cost and accumulated
depreciation of the disposed assets are eliminated and any gain
or loss on disposition is included in the results of operations
in the year of disposal.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Streamline Health reviews the carrying value of the long-lived
assets periodically to determine if facts and circumstances
exist that would suggest that assets might be impaired or that
the useful lives should be modified. Among the factors the
Company considers in making the evaluation are changes in market
position and profitability. If facts and circumstances are
present which may indicate impairment is probable, the Company
will prepare a projection of the undiscounted cash flows of the
specific asset and determine if the long-lived assets are
recoverable based on these undiscounted cash flows. If
impairment is indicated, an adjustment will be made to reduce
the carrying amount of these assets to their fair value.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
Software development costs associated with the planning and
designing phase of software development, including coding and
testing activities necessary to establish technological
feasibility, are classified as product research and development
and are expensed as incurred. Once technological feasibility has
been determined, a portion of the costs incurred in development,
including coding, testing, and product quality assurance, are
capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of
unamortized cost or net realizable value. Streamline Health
capitalized approximately $3,668,000 and $3,680,000 in fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively.
46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
Streamline Health reviews, on an on-going basis, the carrying
value of its capitalized software development expenditures, net
of accumulated amortization. Unamortized capitalized costs
determined to be in excess of the net realizable value of a
product are expensed at the date of such determination. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company expensed
approximately $409,000 for partial impairment on a specific
workflow product that had been under development for several
years. The capitalized costs relating to this product were
written down to its expected net realizable value based upon the
current future sales estimates. This impairment charge is
reflected in the financial statements as capitalized software
amortization in the cost of system sales. There were no
impairment charges in fiscal 2009.
Amortization is provided on a
product-by-product
basis over the estimated economic life of the software,
typically three years, using the straight-line method.
Amortization commences when a product is available for general
release to customers. Amortization expense was approximately
$2,100,000 and $1,668,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Research and development expense, net of capitalized amounts,
was $1,683,000 and $2,264,000 in fiscal 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate
fair value based on the short-term maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amount of the Companys long-term
debt approximates fair value due to the variable interest rate
associated with the debt.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company derives revenue from the licensing and sale of
systems, either directly to end-users or through third-party
resellers, comprising of internally developed software,
third-party software and hardware components; product support,
maintenance and professional services. The Company also sells
the software application through hosting services which also
provide high quality, transaction or subscription based document
imaging/management services from a central data center.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with
ASC 985-605,
Software-Revenue Recognition and
ASC 605-25
Revenue Recognition Multiple-element
arrangements. The Company commences revenue recognition when
the following criteria all have been met:
|
|
|
|
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
|
|
|
|
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
|
|
|
|
The arrangement fees are fixed or determinable, and
|
|
|
|
Collection is considered probable
|
If the Company determines that any of the above criteria has not
been met, the Company will defer recognition of the revenue
until all the criteria have been met.
Multiple Element Arrangements In arrangements
that include multiple elements (e.g., proprietary software,
other third party hardware and software components,
post-contract customer support (PCS) installation services,
and/or
training), the Company allocates the total revenue to be earned
under the arrangement to the elements based on their relative
fair value of vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), which
is based on the price charged when that element is sold
separately. The amounts representing the fair value of VSOE of
the undelivered items such as PCS are deferred until delivered,
or recognized pro rata over the service contract, which is
typically one year.
Software License Arrangements The Company
utilizes the residual method to recognize software license fees
provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Under the residual method, the difference between the fair value
of VSOE of the undelivered elements and the total arrangement
fee is recognized as the
47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
license fee upon delivery. The revenue related to the
undelivered elements are deferred until delivered
and/or
recognized pro rata over the term that the related service
contract.
Billings to customers recorded prior to the recognition of
revenues are classified as deferred revenues. Revenues
recognized prior to progress billings to customers are recorded
as contract receivables.
Concentrations
Financial instruments, which potentially expose Streamline
Health to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of
accounts receivable. Streamline Healths accounts
receivable are concentrated in the healthcare industry. However,
Streamline Healths customers typically are
well-established hospitals, medical facilities, or major Health
Information Systems companies that resell Streamline
Healths solutions that have good credit histories and
payments have been received within normal time frames for the
industry. However, some hospitals and medical facilities have
experienced significant operating losses as a result of limits
on third-party reimbursements from insurance companies and
governmental entities and extended payment of receivables from
these entities is not uncommon.
To date, Streamline Health has relied on a limited number of
customers and remarketing partners for a substantial portion of
its total revenues. Streamline Health expects that a significant
portion of its future revenues will continue to be generated by
a limited number of customers and its remarketing partners.
Streamline Health currently buys all of its hardware and some
major software components of its Healthcare Information Systems
from third-party vendors. Although there are a limited number of
vendors capable of supplying these components, management
believes that other suppliers could provide similar components
on comparable terms.
Equity
Awards
The Company is required to recognize compensation cost for
share-based payments based on their grant-date fair value from
the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition
provisions are first applied. The Company incurred total annual
compensation expense related to stock-based awards of $275,000
and $159,000 in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The fair value of the stock options granted in 2009 and 2008 was
estimated at the date of grants using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model. Option pricing model input assumptions such as
expected term, expected volatility, and risk-free interest rate
impact the fair value estimate. Further, the forfeiture rate
impacts the amount of aggregate compensation. These assumptions
are subjective and are generally derived from external (such as,
risk free rate of interest) and historical data (such as,
volatility factor, expected term, and forfeiture rates). Future
grants of equity awards accounted for as stock-based
compensation could have a material impact on reported expenses
depending upon the number, value and vesting period of future
awards.
During fiscal 2009, the Company issued restricted stock awards
in the form of Company common stock. The fair value of these
awards is based on the market close price per share on the day
of grant. The Company expenses the compensation cost of these
awards as the restriction period lapses, which is usually a one
year service period to the Company.
Foreign
Currency
The Companys functional currency is the U.S. Dollar.
During fiscal 2009, the Company began engaging in
foreign-currency transactions which are denominated in a
currency other than the Companys functional currency. At
the balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated
in a foreign currency are adjusted to reflect the current
exchange rate. Transaction gains and losses are included in net
income for the period. Foreign currency rates, with respect to
unsettled transactions, have not materially changed subsequent
to the balance sheet date. Foreign currency transaction gains
were $23,000 in fiscal 2009.
48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
Foreign currency hedge instruments are used to partially offset
its business exposure to foreign exchange risk of the Canadian
dollar for the Companys transactions with a current
Canadian customer. The Company may enter into foreign currency
forward and option contracts to offset some of the foreign
exchange risk of expected future cash flows on certain
forecasted revenue and cost of sales, and on certain existing
accounts receivable and payable. However, the Company may choose
not to hedge certain foreign exchange exposures for a variety of
reasons, including but not limited to immateriality. Outstanding
forward currency hedge contracts that are considered effective
are recorded as current assets, and unrecognized gains or losses
are in accumulated other comprehensive income until contract
maturity. The Company expects the unrecognized gains or losses
within accumulated other comprehensive income to be reclassified
into earnings in the next twelve months or less. Currently, the
Company does not have any foreign currency hedge instruments for
trading or other speculative purposes.
The Companys foreign currency hedges were valued using the
observable changes in fair values of hedged assets or
liabilities due to the change in foreign exchange rates during
the year ended January 31, 2010 (Level 2). The fair
value of foreign currency forward contracts is $6,000 at
January 31, 2010.
Income
Taxes
The provisions for income taxes are accounted for under the
asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. In assessing net deferred tax assets, the Company
considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company
establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than
not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
The Company believes that its income tax positions and
deductions will be sustained on audit. A tax position is
recognized as a benefit only if it is more likely than
not that the tax position would be sustained in a tax
examination. No reserves for uncertain tax positions have been
recorded as of January 31, 2010. The Company would
recognize any corresponding interest and penalties associated
with its income tax positions in income tax expense.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income consists of two components, net income and
other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income refers to
revenue, expenses, gains, and losses that under generally
accepted accounting principles are recorded as an element of
shareholders equity but are excluded from net income. The
Companys other comprehensive income consists of the
effective portion of foreign currency hedge instruments.
The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive
income, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
Net unrecognized gain (loss) on foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,293,728
|
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings (loss) Per Common Share
The basic net earnings (loss) per common share are computed
based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each period. The diluted net earnings (loss)
per common share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if stock options, stock purchase plan commitments, and
restricted stock were exercised into Common Stock, under certain
circumstances, that then would share in the earnings of
Streamline Health. The dilutive effect is calculated using the
treasury stock method.
49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
The following is the calculation of the basic and diluted net
earnings per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,288,108
|
|
|
$
|
(1,374,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding used in basic per common share
computations
|
|
|
9,381,285
|
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
149,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of average shares used in diluted per common share
computation
|
|
|
9,530,891
|
|
|
|
9,286,261
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
.14
|
|
|
$
|
(.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted earnings per share exclude the effect of 166,382 and
634,882 outstanding stock options and restricted stock in fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively. The inclusion of these options
would be anti-dilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2009-01,
Amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168 The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB ASC Topic 105,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP.
FASB ASC Topic 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but
is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative
U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related
to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting
standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting
literature not included in the FASB Codification will be
considered non-authoritative. These provisions of FASB ASC Topic
105 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009 and, accordingly, are effective for the
Company for the current fiscal reporting period. The adoption of
this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations, but will impact
our financial reporting process by eliminating all references to
pre-codification standards. On the effective date of this
Statement, the Codification superseded all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards, and all other
non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in
the Codification became non-authoritative.
In January 2008, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures Overall, with respect to its
financial assets and liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB
updated its guidance to provide a one year deferral of the
effective date for non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in
the financial statements at fair value at least annually.
Therefore, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic
820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities
effective February 1, 2009, and such adoption did not have
a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC
Topic 825, Financial Instruments, which amends previous
Topic 825 guidance to require disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial
statements. This pronouncement was effective for periods ended
after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 825 on July 31, 2009. The
adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC
Topic 855, Subsequent Events, which establishes general
standards of accounting for, and disclosures of, events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. This
pronouncement was effective for interim or fiscal periods ended
after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 855 for the fiscal quarter ended
July 31, 2009. This ASC was subsequently amended in
February 2010 by ASU
50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
2010-09.
This pronouncement and subsequent amendment did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-13
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), which applies to the
revenue recognition of multiple element arrangements. The new
guidance states that if vendor specific objective evidence or
third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot
be determined, companies will be required to develop a best
estimate of the selling price to separate deliverables and
allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling
price method. The accounting guidance will be applied
prospectively and will become effective during the first quarter
of fiscal year 2011. Early adoption is allowed. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance on
our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-14
Software (Topic 985), which applies to certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. Previously,
companies that sold tangible products with more than
incidental software were required to apply software
revenue recognition guidance. This guidance often delayed
revenue recognition for the delivery of the tangible product.
Under the new guidance, tangible products that have software
components that are essential to the functionality
of the tangible product will be excluded from the software
revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance will include
factors to help companies determine what is essential to
the functionality. Software-enabled products will now be
subject to other revenue guidance and will likely follow the
guidance for multiple deliverable arrangements issued by the
FASB in September 2009. The new guidance is to be applied on a
prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. If a
company elects earlier application and the first reporting
period of adoption is not the first reporting period in the
companys fiscal year, the guidance must be applied through
retrospective application from the beginning of the
companys fiscal year and the company must disclose the
effect of the change to those previously reported periods. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting
guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
Streamline Health rents office and data center space and
equipment under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at
various times through fiscal year 2013. Future minimum lease
payments under non-cancelable operating leases for the next four
fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
$
|
266,906
|
|
|
$
|
242,813
|
|
|
$
|
24,093
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equipment & services
|
|
|
61,854
|
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
4,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
328,760
|
|
|
$
|
261,845
|
|
|
$
|
43,125
|
|
|
$
|
19,032
|
|
|
$
|
4,758
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $384,000 and $401,000 for fiscal years 2009 and
2008, respectively.
In January 2010, the Company acquired additional computer
equipment for the application hosting services data center,
which are accounted for as capitalized leases. The lease is
payable in quarterly installments of $58,000,
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
through January 2012. The terms of the lease call for a bargain
purchase option of $1 at the end of the lease term. The
following is an analysis of the leased property under capital
leases by major classes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
215,427
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
118,381
|
|
Other
|
|
|
77,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
410,975
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value of leased property
|
|
$
|
410,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The present value of the future lease payments upon inception is
$411,000 using interest rates implicit in the lease agreement at
the inception of the lease. The total obligations under the
capital lease for the remainder of the term are as follows:
$230,000 in 2010 and $231,000 in 2011. The total obligations of
the minimum lease payments, less the amount representing
interest of $50,000 is reflected in the balance sheet as a
current obligation of $249,000 and a non-current obligation of
$162,000.
On July 31, 2008, the Company entered into a new revolving
loan agreement with Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH, in the
principal amount of $2,000,000. The interest rate on amounts
borrowed accrued at a variable rate based on the trailing twelve
months earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA). The agreement contained financial
covenants including: Minimum tangible net worth, maximum fixed
charge coverage ratio and maximum funded indebtedness to EBITDA
ratio.
On January 6, 2009, the Company entered into a revised
revolving note with Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH. The terms
of the loan remained the same as set forth in the revolving note
entered into on July 30, 2008 except that the borrowing
base limitation was modified and set at the lesser of 80% of the
net amount of borrowers eligible accounts (less than
90 days) or two times trailing twelve month EBITDA of the
Company. This was compared to the previous limitation of the
lesser of 80% of the net amount of borrowers eligible
accounts (less than 90 days) or the tangible net worth of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
On October 21, 2009, the Company entered into an amended
and restated revolving note with Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati,
OH. The terms of the loan remain the same as set forth in the
revolving note entered into on July 31, 2008, as amended on
January 6, 2009, except as follows: (i) the maximum
principal amount that can be borrowed was increased to
$2,750,000 from the prior maximum amount of $2,000,000;
(ii) the maturity date of the loan has been extended to
October 1, 2011 from August 1, 2010; and
(iii) the interest rate on the outstanding principal
balance will accrue at an annual floating rate of interest equal
to the Adjusted Libor Rate (as defined in the revolving note)
plus 3.25%. The interest rate on the note was 3.50% at
January 31, 2010.
In connection with the entering into of the revised revolving
note, the Company also entered into an amended and restated
continuing guaranty agreement. The terms of the continuing
guarantee agreement remain the same as set forth in the guaranty
agreement entered into on July 31, 2008, as amended on
January 6, 2009, except that the covenant that formerly
required the Company to maintain certain levels of minimum
tangible net worth has been eliminated.
The note also continues to be secured by a first lien on all of
the assets of the Company pursuant to security agreements
entered into by the Company.
The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants at
January 31, 2010. The Company pays a commitment fee on the
unused portion of the facility of .06%. The Company had
outstanding borrowings of $900,000 and $800,000 under this
revolving loan as of January 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
Income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(14,500
|
)
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,500
|
)
|
|
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state income tax (expense)
|
|
$
|
(40,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax benefit (provision) for income taxes differs from
the Federal statutory rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal tax (expense) benefit at Statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(448,461
|
)
|
|
$
|
463,512
|
|
State and local taxes, net of federal (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(11,428
|
)
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
585,217
|
|
|
|
(351,282
|
)
|
Permanent items
|
|
|
(128,473
|
)
|
|
|
(125,142
|
)
|
Alternative minimum tax expense
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(11,355
|
)
|
|
|
(6,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
(40,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Streamline Health provides deferred income taxes for temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for
financial reporting and income tax purposes. The income tax
effects of these temporary differences are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
9,881,084
|
|
|
$
|
10,456,072
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
172,833
|
|
|
|
170,026
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
99,829
|
|
|
|
92,386
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53,070
|
|
|
|
73,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,206,816
|
|
|
|
10,792,033
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(8,331,816
|
)
|
|
|
(8,917,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 31, 2010, Streamline Health had a net operating
loss carry forward of $30,000,000 which expires at various dates
through 2030. Streamline Health also has an Alternative Minimum
Tax credit carry forward of
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
approximately $74,000, which has an unlimited carry forward
period. Certain changes in stock ownership can result in a
limitation on the amount of net operating loss carry forward
that can be utilized each year.
As of January 31, 2010, a valuation allowance of $8,332,000
is required to reduce the deferred tax assets, primarily
relating to loss carry forwards, to a level currently believed
will be utilized to offset future earnings before income taxes
based upon the current backlog and forecasts over the next three
years. The valuation allowance is required due to the inability
to predict on a longer term basis that Streamline Health will
more likely than not attain levels of profitability
required to utilize additional loss carry forwards. The
Companys practice will be to recognize interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense
and other expense, respectively.
The Company and its subsidiary are subject to U.S. Federal
income tax as well as income taxes in multiple state and local
jurisdictions. The Company has concluded all U.S. Federal
tax matters for years through January 31, 2006. All
material state and local income tax matters have been concluded
for years through January 31, 2004.
The Company believes that its income tax positions and
deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate
adjustments that will result in a material change to its
financial position during the next twelve months. Therefore, no
reserves for uncertain tax positions have been recorded as of
January 31, 2010.
During fiscal year 2009, three customers, exclusive of our
remarketing partners, accounted for 8%, 7%, and 5% of total
revenues, and represent 9%, 6%, 6%, respectively of total
accounts receivable. During fiscal year 2008, three customers,
exclusive of our remarketing partners, accounted for 13%, 7%,
and 6% of total revenues, and represented 46% of total accounts
receivable.
During fiscal years 2009 and 2008 our major remarketing partners
accounted for 42% and 38%, respectively of our total revenues.
At January 31, 2010 and 2009 approximately, 61% and 27%,
respectively, of Streamline Healths accounts receivables
were due from remarketing partners. There were no material
amounts of revenue recognized or accounts receivable for our
remarketing partner Telus Health in fiscal 2008.
|
|
NOTE G
|
EMPLOYEE
RETIREMENT PLAN
|
Streamline Health has established a 401(k) retirement plan that
covers all employees. Company contributions to the plan may be
made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company
matches 100% up to the first 4% of compensation deferred by each
employee in the 401(k) plan. The total compensation expense for
this matching contribution was $284,000 and $327,000 in fiscal
2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
NOTE H
|
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
|
Streamline Health has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under
which employees may purchase up to 500,000 shares of Common
Stock. Under the plan, eligible employees may elect to
contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 10% of their base
pay to a trust during any plan year, July 1 through
June 30, of the following year. At June 30 of each year,
the plan issues for the benefit of the employees shares of
Common Stock at the lesser of (a) 85% of the Fair Market
Value of the Common Stock on July 1, of the prior year, or
(b) 85% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on
June 30, of the current year. At January 31, 2010,
248,907 shares remain that can be purchased under the plan.
The Company recognized compensation expense of $28,000 and
$39,000 for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During fiscal 2009 35,540 shares were purchased at the
price of $1.39; during fiscal 2008, 37,462 shares were
purchased at the price of $1.52 per share.
The purchase price at June 30, 2010, will be 85% of the
lower of (a) the closing price on July 1, 2009 ($2.80)
or (b) 85% of the closing price on June 30, 2010.
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE I
|
STOCK
BASED COMPENSATION
|
Stock
Option Plans
Streamline Healths 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan
authorized the grant of options to employees for Streamline
Healths Common Stock. The options granted have terms of
ten years or less and generally vest and become fully
exercisable ratably over three years of continuous employment
from the date of grant. At January 31, 2010, options to
purchase 118,500 shares of Streamline Healths Common
Stock have been granted and are outstanding under the Plan. No
more options can be granted under this plan.
Streamline Healths 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan authorized the grant of options for shares of
Streamline Healths Common Stock. The options granted have
terms of ten years or less, and vest and become fully
exercisable ratably over three years of continuous service as a
director from the date of grant. At January 31, 2010,
options to purchase 15,000 shares of Streamline Health
Common Stock have been granted and are outstanding under the
Plan. No more options can be granted under this plan.
Streamline Healths 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan which
authorizes the Company to issue up to 1,000,000 equity awards
(Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs), and Restricted Stock) to directors and
employees of the Company. At January 31, 2010, options to
purchase 509,382 shares of Streamline Health Common Stock
have been granted and are outstanding under the Plan. There are
no SARs outstanding under the plan.
A summary of stock option activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of year
|
|
|
634,882
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
409,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
355,382
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
(57,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
(72,500
|
)
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of year
|
|
|
637,882
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
634,882
|
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of year
|
|
|
361,954
|
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
237,830
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options at year end
|
|
$
|
1,409,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,117,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at year end
|
|
$
|
799,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during
year
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of Options exercised during the year
|
|
$
|
24,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the 2009 and 2008 stock-based compensation was
estimated at the date of grants using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions
for each fiscal year: risk-free interest rate of 2.50%, a
dividend yield of zero percent; a weighted average volatility
factor of the expected market price of Streamline Healths
Common Stock of .563 (in 2009), and .771 (in 2008) and a
weighted average expected
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
life of stock options of five years and a forfeiture rate of
zero. The following table summarizes the options as of
January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
exercise
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
options
|
|
price
|
|
life in years
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
637,882
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
(1)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
361,954
|
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
(2)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercise prices range from $0.53 to $6.03, of which
405,882 shares are between $0.53 and $1.95 per share,
187,000 shares are between $2.08 and $4.35 per share, and
45,000 shares are between $5.17 and $6.03 per share. |
|
(2) |
|
The exercise prices range from $0.53 to $6.03, of which
211,959 shares are between $0.53 and $1.95 per share,
104,995 shares are between $2.08 and $4.35 per share, and
45,000 shares are between $5.17 and $6.03 per share. |
The following table is a summary of non-vested shares under the
stock option plans at January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
grant-date
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2008
|
|
|
86,672
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
344,382
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(45,002
|
)
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2009
|
|
|
397,052
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(145,124
|
)
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010
|
|
|
275,928
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 31, 2010, there was approximately $318,000 of
compensation cost that has not yet been recognized related to
non-vested stock-based awards. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted average period of three
years.
The expense associated with stock option awards was $203,000 and
$120,000, for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Cash received from exercise of options and the employee stock
purchase plan was $66,000 and $120,000, respectively, in fiscal
2009 and 2008.
The 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Incentive
Compensation Plan contains change of control provisions whereby
any outstanding equity awards under the plans subject to
vesting, which have not fully vested as of the date of the
change in control, shall automatically vest and become
immediately exercisable. One of the change in control provisions
is deemed to occur if there is a change in beneficial ownership,
or authority to vote, directly or indirectly, securities
representing 20% or more of the total of all of Streamline
Healths then outstanding voting securities, unless through
a transaction arranged by, or consummated with the prior
approval of the Board of Directors. Other change in control
provisions relate to mergers and acquisitions or a determination
of change in control by Streamline Healths Board of
Directors.
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Stock
In fiscal 2009, the Company authorized the grant of restricted
stock awards under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan to
employees and members of the Board of Directors. The
restrictions on the shares granted generally lapse over a one
year term of continuous employment from the date of grant. The
grant date fair value per share of restricted stock, which is
the stock price on the grant date, is expensed on a
straight-line basis as the restriction period lapses. The shares
represented by restricted stock awards are considered
outstanding at the grant date, as the recipients are entitled to
voting rights. A summary of restricted stock award activity for
the period is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
grant date
|
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
35,502
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at January 31, 2010
|
|
|
35,502
|
|
|
$
|
2.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 31, 2010, there was approximately $56,000 of
compensation cost that has not yet been recognized related to
restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a remaining period of one year.
The expense associated with restricted stock awards was $44,000
for fiscal 2009.
|
|
NOTE J
|
COMMITTMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Application
Hosting Services
Streamline Health enters into long-term agreements to provide
document imaging/management and workflow services to its
healthcare customers on an outsourced basis from a central data
center. Streamline Health guarantees specific
up-time and response time performance
standards, which, if not met may result in reduced revenues, as
a penalty, for the month in which the standards are not met.
There were no contingencies of this nature as of
January 31, 2010.
Employment
Agreements
Streamline Health has entered into employment agreements with
its officers and employees that generally provide annual salary,
a minimum bonus, discretionary bonus, stock incentive
provisions, and severance arrangements.
Reserved
Common Stock
Streamline Health has reserved 1,346,943 shares of the
Common Stock authorized for issuance in connection with various
Equity Award Plans and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Litigation
There are, from time to time, claims pending against Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiary. There were no
outstanding legal claims as of January 31, 2010.
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE K
|
QUARTERLY
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
The following sets forth selected quarterly financial
information for fiscal years 2009 and 2008. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information have been included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,751
|
|
|
$
|
4,069
|
|
|
$
|
4,106
|
|
|
$
|
6,282
|
|
|
$
|
18,208
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
8,540
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Basic net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.00
|
)
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.17
|
|
|
|
.14
|
|
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.00
|
)
|
|
|
(.03
|
)
|
|
|
.17
|
|
|
|
.14
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,355
|
|
|
|
9,371
|
|
|
|
9,398
|
|
|
|
9,401
|
|
|
|
9,381
|
|
Stock Price(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
3.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
3.58
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Quarter and year-end close
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
Cash dividends declared(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,604
|
|
|
$
|
4,837
|
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
$
|
3,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
Operating profit (loss)(d)
|
|
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
Net earnings (loss)(d)
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
Basic net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share(a)
|
|
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
(.15
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
9,275
|
|
|
|
9,303
|
|
|
|
9,306
|
|
|
|
9,286
|
|
Stock Price(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Quarter and year-end close
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
Cash dividends declared(c)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Quarterly amounts may not be additive. |
|
(b) |
|
Based on data available through The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. |
|
(c) |
|
Streamline Health has not paid a dividend on its Common Stock
since its inception and does not intend to pay any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, a $409,000
impairment charge of capitalized software development costs. |
58
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc.
For the two years ended January 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosures
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A(T)
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Streamline Health maintains disclosure controls and procedures
that are designed to ensure that there is reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in Streamline
Healths Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to Streamline Healths
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure based on the definition of
disclosure controls and procedures in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e).
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired
control objectives, and management necessarily was required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship
of possible controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of Streamline Healths senior management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of Streamline Healths disclosure controls and
procedures to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures.
Based on that evaluation, Streamline Healths management,
including the Chief Executive and Interim Chief Financial
Officer, concluded that there is reasonable assurance that
Streamline Healths disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report and
there have been no changes in Streamline Healths internal
control or in the other controls during the quarter ended
January 31, 2010 that could materially affect, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controls over
financial reporting.
59
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting of Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America.
Strong internal controls is an objective that is reinforced
through our Code of Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth
our commitment to conduct business with integrity, and within
both the letter and the spirit of the law. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting includes a Control
Self-Assessment Program that is conducted annually. Management
takes appropriate action to correct any identified control
deficiencies. Because of its inherent limitations, any system of
internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well
designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements due to the
possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden or
that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur that are not
detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal
control effectiveness may vary over time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2010, using criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) and concluded that the Company maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2010, based on these criteria.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm
regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Managements report was not subject to attestation by the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to temporary rules (Item 308T of
Regulation S-K)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permits the
Company to provide only managements report in this annual
report.
This report shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, unless the registrant specifically
states that the report is to be considered filed
under the Exchange Act or incorporates it by reference into a
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
60
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Goverance
|
The information required by Items 401, 405 and
407(c)(3),(d)(4) and (d)(5) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 26, 2010 from the
information appearing under the captions Election of
Directors, Board of Directors Meetings and
Committees Stock Ownership by Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management, and Compliance with
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Certain
information regarding Streamline Healths Executive
Officers is set forth in Part I, of this
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant.
The information relating to the Code of Ethics required by
Items 406 of
Regulation S-K
is included herein by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to this
Form 10-K.
Streamline Health has adopted the Code of Ethics that applies to
all of its directors, officers (including its chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer,
controller and any person performing similar functions) and
employees. Streamline Health has also made the Code of Ethics
available on its website at www.streamlinehealth.net and will
provide a copy, free of charge, upon request.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by Items 402 and 407(e)(4) and
(e)(5) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 26, 2010 from the
information appearing under the caption Executive
Compensation.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
Securities
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by Item 403 of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths Definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 26, 2010 from
the information appearing under the caption Stock
Ownership by Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans required by Item 201(d) of
Regulation S-K
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
securities to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
issued upon
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
for future issuance
|
|
|
|
exercise of
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
under equity
|
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
outstanding
|
|
|
compensation plans
|
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
Plan category
|
|
and rights
|
|
|
and rights
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
637,882(1, 2
& 3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
460,116(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
637,882(1, 2
& 3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
460,116(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 15,000 options that can be exercised under the 1996
non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan and 118,500
options that can be exercised under the 1996 Employee Stock
Option Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 504,382 options that can be exercised under the 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes 248,945 shares that can be issued under the 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is more fully described in
footnote J of the enclosed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(4) |
|
The Company does not have any equity compensation plans that
have not been approved by the Companys Stockholders. |
61
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
Certain
Relationships, Related Transactions and Directors
Independence
|
The information required by Item 404 and 407(a) of
Regulation S-K
is incorporated herein by reference from Streamline
Healths definitive proxy statement for its Annual
Stockholders Meeting to be held on May 26, 2010 from the
information appearing under the captions Transactions with
Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons
and Board of Directors Meetings and Committees.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for the
Company for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 for audit and other
services provided to Streamline Health by BDO Seidman, LLP,
including its foreign affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
173,000
|
|
|
$
|
159,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
183,000
|
|
|
$
|
169,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has engaged BDO Siedman, LLP to the audit of the
financial statements, in addition to tax consulting and
compliance services for Canadian transactions. The
Companys Audit Committee has considered whether the
provision of the tax and consulting services is compatible with
maintaining the independence of BDO Seidman, LLP. All fees to
BDO Seidman, LLP are pre-approved by the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
Financial
Statements
(a)1. The financial statements listed in ITEM 8 in the
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 56 are
filed as part of this report.
(a)2. The Financial Statement Schedule on page 79 is filed
as part of this report.
(b). Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on page 86 of this report.
The exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference in this
report.
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc.
J. Brian Patsy
Chief Executive Officer
DATE: April 16, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Brian Patsy
J.
Brian Patsy
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
And Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
April 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jonathan
R. Phillips
Jonathan
R. Phillips
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
J. VonderBrink
Edward
J. VonderBrink
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
C. Levy,
Richard
C. Levy, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Andrew
L. Turner
Andrew
L. Turner
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jay
D. Miller
Jay
D. Miller
|
|
Director
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald
E. Vick, Jr.
Donald
E. Vick, Jr.
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 15, 2010
|
63
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
3.1(a)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision System, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
3.1(b)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc., amendment No. 1.
(Previously filed with the Commission and incorporated herein by
reference from the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Commission on September 8, 2006.)
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Commission on June 5, 2007.)
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of the Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights
of the Convertible Preferred Stock (Par Value $.01 Per Share) of
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc.
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.) Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
4.2
|
|
Specimen Preferred Stock Certificate of Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.1#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.2(a)#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.2(b)#
|
|
First Amendment to Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a/LanVision Systems, Inc. 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 4.1(b) of,
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Registration
Statement on
Form S-8,
file number
333-20765,
as filed with the Commission on January 31, 1997.)
|
10.2(c) #
|
|
Second Amendment to Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision Systems, Inc. 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan. (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.) Statement on
Form S-8,
file number
333-20765,
as filed with the Commission on March 1, 2001.)
|
10.3#
|
|
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc.
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from, the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc. ) Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-01494,
as filed with the Commission on April 15, 1996.)
|
10.4#
|
|
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan of Streamline Health Solutions,
Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on May 26, 2005.)
|
10.5#
|
|
Employment Agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Donald E. Vick effective December 3,
1996. (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.5 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, as filed with
the Commission on April 29, 2002.)
|
64
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10.5(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between
Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and Donald E. Vick
effective January 27, 2006 (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.6#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Paul W. Bridge, Jr., effective
February 1, 2004 (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on September 10, 2004.)
|
10.6(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement between
Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and Paul W.
Bridge, Jr. effective January 27, 2006 (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.7#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a/
LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and J. Brian Patsy effective February 1,
2003 (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.7 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on April 8, 2004.)
|
10.7(a)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 27, 2005 to the
Employment Agreement among J. Brian Patsy, Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and Streamline
Health Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on February 1, 2005.)
|
10.7(b)#
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated January 27, 2006 to the
Employment Agreement among J. Brian Patsy, Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and Streamline
Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 31, 2006.)
|
10.8(a)#
|
|
Employment Agreement among Streamline Health Solutions, Inc.
f/k/a/ LanVision Systems, Inc., Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. and Joseph O. Brown, II, effective
February 1, 2004. (Previously filed with the Commission,
and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of
the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Commission on December 7, 2007.)
|
10.8(b)#
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated November 27, 2007 to the
Employment Agreement among Joseph O. Brown, II, Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc. f/k/a LanVision Systems, Inc. and
Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.8(b) of the Registrants (Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
the Commission on April 7, 2008.)
|
10.9#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and Gary M.
Winzenread effective June 18, 2007. (Previously filed with
the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Commission on December 7, 2007.)
|
10.9(b)#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and Gary M.
Winzenread effective June 1, 2008. (Previously filed with
the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10 of the Registrants (Streamline Health
Solutions, Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 11, 2008.)
|
10.10#
|
|
Employment agreement between Streamline Health, Inc. and B.
Scott Boyden, Jr. effective June 16, 2008. (Previously
filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference
from, Exhibit 10 of the Registrants (Streamline
Health Solutions, Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 26, 2008.)
|
65
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
10.11
|
|
Registrants Guarantee of Lease Agreement between
Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. and The Western
and Southern Life Insurance Company (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference from,
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants (LanVision Systems,
Inc.)
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on September 10, 2004.)
|
10.12(c)
|
|
First Amendment to Lease and Acceptance of Indemnification
Agreement for office space between Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a
LanVision, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary) and The Western and
Southern Life Insurance Company, effective January 31,
2005. (Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference from, Exhibit 11.11(c) of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, as filed with
the Commission on April 8, 2005.)
|
10.13(a)**
|
|
Reseller Agreement between IDX Information Systems Corporation
and Streamline Health, Inc. f/k/a LanVision, Inc. entered into
on January 30, 2002. (Previously filed with the Commission,
and incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.11 of
the Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, as filed with
the Commission on April 29, 2002.)
|
10.13(b)
|
|
First Amendment to the Reseller Agreement between IDX
Information Systems Corporation and Streamline Health, Inc.
f/k/a LanVision, Inc. entered into on January 30, 2002
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 10 of the Registrants
(LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 30, 2002, as filed with the
Commission on June 4, 2002.).
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for all directors and
officers. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 7, 2006.
|
10.15***#
|
|
Directors Compensation
|
10.16(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated Revolving Note, dated October 21,
2009, between Streamline Health, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Registrant) and the Fifth Third Bank. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference to
exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on October 26, 2009.)
|
10.16(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated October 21,
2009, between Streamline Health, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Registrant) and the Fifth Third Bank. (Previously filed
with the Commission, and incorporated herein by reference to
exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on October 26, 2009.)
|
10.16(c)
|
|
Security Agreement, dated October 21, 2009, between
Streamline Health, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Registrant) and the Fifth Third Bank. (Previously filed with the
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference to
exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on October 26, 2009.)
|
10.17(a)
|
|
Term Lease Master Agreement, and associated documents, dated
January 19, 2010 between Streamline Health, Inc. (a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and IBM Credit LLC.
(Previously filed with the Commission, and incorporated herein
by reference from, Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 22, 2010.)
|
10.17(b)
|
|
Term Supplement, dated January 19, 2010, between Streamline
Health, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant) and
IBM Credit LLC. (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 10.2 of the
Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 22, 2010.)
|
11.1
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings***
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethics (Previously filed with the Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference from, Exhibit 14.1 of the
Registrants (LanVision Systems, Inc.)
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on April 8, 2004.)
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant***
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm BDO Seidman, LLP***
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
66
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.***
|
|
|
|
** |
|
The Company has applied for Confidential Treatment of portions
of this agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
*** |
|
Included herein |
|
# |
|
Management Contracts and Compensatory Arrangements. |
67