e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
July 2,
2011
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-32891
Hanesbrands Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
20-3552316
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
1000 East Hanes Mill Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
27105
(Zip
code)
|
(336) 519-8080
(Registrants
telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 22, 2011, there were 97,138,361 shares of
the registrants common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Trademarks,
Trade Names and Service Marks
We own or have rights to use the trademarks, service marks and
trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our
business. Some of the more important trademarks that we own or
have rights to use that may appear in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include the Hanes, Champion, C9 by Champion, Playtex, Bali,
Leggs, Just My Size, barely there, Wonderbra,
Stedman, Outer Banks, Zorba, Rinbros, Duofold and Gear
for Sports marks, which may be registered in the United
States and other jurisdictions. We do not own any trademark,
trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in
this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not
relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally
be identified by the use of words such as may,
believe, will, expect,
project, estimate, intend,
anticipate, plan, continue
or similar expressions. In particular, statements under the
headings Outlook for 2011 and Business and
Industry Trends and other information appearing under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations include
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected in
these statements.
Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an
expectation or belief as to future results or events, such
expectation or belief is based on the current plans and
expectations of our management and expressed in good faith and
believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no
assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be
achieved or accomplished. More information on factors that could
cause actual results or events to differ materially from those
anticipated is included from time to time in our reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC), including our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011, particularly under the
caption Risk Factors.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
or our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011, particularly under the
caption Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation to
update or revise forward-looking statements that may be made to
reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than
as required by law.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You can inspect, read and
copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at
the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information
regarding the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that
makes available reports, proxy statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically.
We make available free of charge at www.hanesbrands.com
(in the Investors section) copies of materials
we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. By referring to our
corporate website, www.hanesbrands.com, or any of our
other websites, we do not incorporate any such website or its
contents into this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
1
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
797,993
|
|
|
|
701,046
|
|
|
|
1,479,878
|
|
|
|
1,301,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
427,240
|
|
|
|
374,806
|
|
|
|
781,765
|
|
|
|
702,236
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
278,772
|
|
|
|
252,001
|
|
|
|
531,454
|
|
|
|
493,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
148,468
|
|
|
|
122,805
|
|
|
|
250,311
|
|
|
|
208,517
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
39,178
|
|
|
|
36,573
|
|
|
|
80,283
|
|
|
|
74,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
108,476
|
|
|
|
83,604
|
|
|
|
168,613
|
|
|
|
130,415
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
33,722
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
97,537
|
|
|
|
96,420
|
|
|
|
97,366
|
|
|
|
96,376
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
99,224
|
|
|
|
98,027
|
|
|
|
98,927
|
|
|
|
97,781
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
44,655
|
|
|
$
|
43,671
|
|
Trade accounts receivable less allowances of $17,243 at
July 2, 2011 and $19,192 at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
612,178
|
|
|
|
503,243
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,640,231
|
|
|
|
1,322,719
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
147,360
|
|
|
|
149,431
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
57,305
|
|
|
|
128,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,501,729
|
|
|
|
2,147,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net
|
|
|
635,612
|
|
|
|
631,254
|
|
Trademarks and other identifiable intangibles, net
|
|
|
176,531
|
|
|
|
178,622
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
432,903
|
|
|
|
430,144
|
|
Deferred tax assets and other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
408,001
|
|
|
|
402,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,154,776
|
|
|
$
|
3,790,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
563,641
|
|
|
$
|
412,369
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
267,341
|
|
|
|
276,303
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
29,011
|
|
|
|
50,678
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,073,048
|
|
|
|
829,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,998,235
|
|
|
|
1,990,735
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
425,693
|
|
|
|
407,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,496,976
|
|
|
|
3,227,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (50,000,000 authorized shares; $.01 par
value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (500,000,000 authorized shares; $.01 par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding 96,740,315 at July 2,
2011 and 96,207,025 at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
245,712
|
|
|
|
294,829
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
614,988
|
|
|
|
480,098
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(203,867
|
)
|
|
|
(213,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
657,800
|
|
|
|
562,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,154,776
|
|
|
$
|
3,790,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
36,899
|
|
|
|
36,601
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
7,236
|
|
|
|
6,128
|
|
Write-off on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
Amortization of loss on interest rate hedge
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
9,542
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
5,818
|
|
Deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
(7,649
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(105,117
|
)
|
|
|
(63,694
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(307,433
|
)
|
|
|
(249,419
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
|
|
14,161
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
149,673
|
|
|
|
108,013
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
(5,649
|
)
|
|
|
(54,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(68,253
|
)
|
|
|
(64,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(47,740
|
)
|
|
|
(58,099
|
)
|
Acquisition of business
|
|
|
(9,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
45,196
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(44,694
|
)
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on notes payable
|
|
|
265,012
|
|
|
|
631,745
|
|
Repayments on notes payable
|
|
|
(287,103
|
)
|
|
|
(665,991
|
)
|
Borrowings on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
189,727
|
|
|
|
149,406
|
|
Repayments on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
(66,672
|
)
|
|
|
(116,891
|
)
|
Borrowings on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
1,840,000
|
|
|
|
1,075,000
|
|
Repayments on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
(1,832,500
|
)
|
|
|
(939,500
|
)
|
Payments to amend credit facilities
|
|
|
(3,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
Repayment of debt under 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,063
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
113,201
|
|
|
|
76,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
43,671
|
|
|
|
38,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
44,655
|
|
|
$
|
36,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
|
|
(1)
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and, in accordance with those rules and
regulations, do not include all information and footnote
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate for a
fair statement of the results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows of Hanesbrands Inc., a Maryland corporation, and
its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company or
Hanesbrands). In the opinion of management, the
condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows for the interim periods presented
herein. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts and disclosures. Actual results may vary from these
estimates.
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys most
recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The results of operations for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be
expected for the full year.
|
|
(2)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
Fair
Value Disclosures
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued new accounting rules related to the
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The new
accounting rules require new disclosures regarding significant
transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value
hierarchy and the activity within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy. The new accounting rules also clarify existing
disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation of assets or
liabilities and the valuation techniques and inputs used to
measure fair value. The new accounting rules were effective for
the Company in the first quarter of 2010, except for the
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures were effective for the Company
in the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of these new rules
did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows but resulted in
certain additional disclosures reflected in Note 8.
Fair
Value Measurements
In May 2011, the FASB issued new accounting rules related to
fair value measurements. The new accounting rules clarify some
existing concepts, eliminate wording differences between GAAP
and International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS), and in some limited cases, change some
principles to achieve convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The new
accounting rules result in a consistent definition of fair value
and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about
fair value between GAAP and IFRS. The new accounting rules also
expand the disclosures for fair value measurements that are
estimated using significant unobservable
(Level 3) inputs. The new accounting rules will be
effective for the Company beginning after December 15,
2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new
accounting rules to have a material effect on the Companys
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
5
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Presentation
of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting rules which require
an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the
components of net income, and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive
statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to
present components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of equity. The new accounting rules will be effective
for the Company beginning after December 15, 2011. The
Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules
to have a material effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Basic earnings per share (EPS) was computed by
dividing net income by the number of weighted average shares of
common stock outstanding during the quarters and six months
ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010. Diluted EPS was
calculated to give effect to all potentially dilutive shares of
common stock using the treasury stock method. The reconciliation
of basic to diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the
quarters and six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3,
2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
97,537
|
|
|
|
96,420
|
|
|
|
97,366
|
|
|
|
96,376
|
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan and other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
99,224
|
|
|
|
98,027
|
|
|
|
98,927
|
|
|
|
97,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010,
options to purchase 6 and 606 shares of common stock,
respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share
calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the
six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010,
options to purchase 193 and 606 shares of common stock,
respectively, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share
calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
6
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
(4)
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
Allowances
for Trade Accounts Receivable
The changes in the Companys allowance for doubtful
accounts and allowance for chargebacks and other deductions for
the quarter and six months ended July 2, 2011 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
Chargebacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
11,116
|
|
|
$
|
8,076
|
|
|
$
|
19,192
|
|
Charged to expenses
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Deductions and write-offs
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(1,609
|
)
|
|
|
(1,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 2, 2011
|
|
|
9,477
|
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
17,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to expenses
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Deductions and write-offs
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(1,509
|
)
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 2, 2011
|
|
$
|
9,280
|
|
|
$
|
7,963
|
|
|
$
|
17,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges to the allowance for doubtful accounts are reflected in
the Selling, general and administrative expenses
line and charges to the allowance for customer chargebacks and
other customer deductions are primarily reflected as a reduction
in the Net sales line of the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income. Deductions and write-offs, which do not
increase or decrease income, represent write-offs of previously
reserved accounts receivable and allowed customer chargebacks
and deductions against gross accounts receivable.
Sales
of Accounts Receivable
The Company has entered into agreements to sell selected trade
accounts receivable to financial institutions. After the sale,
the Company does not retain any interests in the receivables and
the applicable financial institution services and collects these
accounts receivable directly from the customer. Net proceeds of
these accounts receivable sale programs are recognized in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as part of
operating cash flows. The Company recognized funding fees of
$814 and $1,415 during the quarter and six months ended
July 2, 2011 and $974 and $1,463 during the quarter and six
months ended July 3, 2010, respectively, for sales of
accounts receivable to financial institutions in the Other
expenses line in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
196,804
|
|
|
$
|
155,744
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
138,205
|
|
|
|
109,304
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,305,222
|
|
|
|
1,057,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,640,231
|
|
|
$
|
1,322,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
The Company had the following debt at July 2, 2011 and
January 1, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate as of
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
December 2015
|
6.375% Senior Notes
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
December 2020
|
8% Senior Notes
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
December 2016
|
Floating Rate Senior Notes
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
490,735
|
|
|
|
490,735
|
|
|
December 2014
|
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
March 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211,290
|
|
|
|
2,080,735
|
|
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,998,235
|
|
|
$
|
1,990,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 2, 2011, the Company had $7,500 outstanding
under the $600,000 revolving credit facility (the
Revolving Loan Facility) under the senior secured
credit facility that it entered into in 2006 and amended and
restated in December 2009 (as amended and restated, the
2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility), $15,605 of
standby and trade letters of credit issued and outstanding under
this facility and $576,895 of borrowing availability.
In February 2011, the Company amended the 2009 Senior Secured
Credit Facility, which includes the Revolving Loan Facility, to
reflect improved debt ratings. This amendment reduced the
interest rate, extended the maturity date by two years to
December 10, 2015, and increased the flexibility of debt
covenants and the use of excess cash flow. In addition, the
commitment fee for the unused portion of revolving loan
commitments was reduced from 75 basis points to
50 basis points. Further, the applicable margin pricing
grid for the loans, which varies based on the Companys
Leverage Ratio (as defined below), was reduced by 125 basis
points at each applicable Leverage Ratio level.
Pursuant to this amendment, the ratio of total debt to EBITDA
(the Leverage Ratio) that the Company may not exceed
was increased from 4.00 to 1 for each fiscal quarter ending
between October 16, 2010 and April 15, 2011 to 4.50 to
1, and will decline over time to 3.75 to 1. Also, the minimum
ratio of EBITDA to consolidated total interest expense (the
Interest Coverage Ratio) that the Company is
required to maintain was decreased from 3.25 to 1 for each
fiscal quarter ending between July 16, 2011 and
October 15, 2012 to 3.00 to 1 and will increase over time
to 3.25 to 1. In addition, the Company will be required to
maintain a maximum ratio of senior secured indebtedness to
EBITDA (the Senior Secured Leverage Ratio), which
for each fiscal quarter ending between October 16, 2010 and
October 15, 2012 cannot exceed 2.50 to 1, and will decline
over time to 2.00 to 1. The methods of calculating all of the
components used in these ratios are included in the 2009 Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This amendment also significantly
increased the flexibility of the indebtedness, investment and
restricted payments baskets and use of excess cash flow under
the 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company incurred
$3,089 in debt amendment fees in connection with the amendment,
which will be amortized over the term of the 2009 Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
In January 2011, the Company amended the accounts receivable
securitization facility that it entered into in November 2007
(the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility) to
provide for two of the subsidiaries acquired by the Company in
the Gear for Sports acquisition, in addition to the Company, to
sell, on a revolving basis, certain domestic trade receivables
pursuant to this facility. Prior to this amendment, the Accounts
Receivable Securitization Facility contained the same financial
ratio provisions as those contained in the 2009 Senior Secured
Credit Facility. Pursuant to this amendment, the Company is
required to maintain the financial ratios and other financial
covenants contained from time to time in the 2009 Senior Secured
Credit
8
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Facility, provided that any changes to such covenants after the
date of this amendment will only be applicable for purposes of
the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility if approved by
the managing agents under the Accounts Receivable Securitization
Facility or their affiliates. This amendment also provided for
certain other amendments to the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Facility, including extending the termination
date to March 31, 2011. In connection with this amendment,
certain fees were due to the managing agents and certain fees
payable to the committed purchasers and the conduit purchasers
were decreased.
The Company also amended the Accounts Receivable Securitization
Facility in March 2011. In order to take greater advantage of
favorable interest rates, the amount of funding available under
the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, which was
initially $250,000 and which the Company reduced to $150,000
effective February 2010, was increased to $225,000. This
amendment also provided for certain other amendments to the
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, including extending
the termination date to March 16, 2012. In addition,
certain of the factors that contribute to the overall
availability of funding were modified in a manner that, taken
together, could result in an increase in the amount of funding
that will be available under the facility. The Company incurred
$668 in debt amendment fees in connection with the amendment,
which will be amortized over the term of the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Facility.
As of July 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all
financial covenants under its credit facilities.
|
|
(7)
|
Financial
Instruments and Risk Management
|
The Company uses financial instruments to manage its exposures
to movements in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and
commodity prices. The use of these financial instruments
modifies the Companys exposure to these risks with the
goal of reducing the risk or cost to the Company. The Company
does not use derivatives for trading purposes and is not a party
to leveraged derivative contracts.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either
assets or liabilities at fair value in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value is based upon either
market quotes for actively traded instruments or independent
bids for nonexchange traded instruments. The Company formally
documents its hedge relationships, including identifying the
hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk
management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge
transaction. This process includes linking derivatives that are
designated as hedges of specific assets, liabilities, firm
commitments or forecasted transactions to the hedged risk. On
the date the derivative is entered into, the Company designates
the derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, net
investment hedge or a mark to market hedge, and accounts for the
derivative in accordance with its designation. The Company also
formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly
thereafter, whether the derivatives are highly effective in
offsetting changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the
hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be
a highly effective hedge, or if the anticipated transaction is
no longer likely to occur, the Company discontinues hedge
accounting, and any deferred gains or losses are recorded in the
respective measurement period. The Company currently does not
have any fair value or net investment hedge instruments.
The Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of
nonperformance by individual counterparties or the entire group
of counterparties to the Companys derivative contracts.
Risk of nonperformance by counterparties is mitigated by dealing
with highly rated counterparties and by diversifying across
counterparties.
9
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Mark
to Market Hedges
A derivative used as a hedging instrument whose change in fair
value is recognized to act as an economic hedge against changes
in the values of the hedged item is designated a mark to market
hedge.
Mark to
Market Hedges Intercompany Foreign Exchange
Transactions
The Company uses foreign exchange derivative contracts to reduce
the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on anticipated
intercompany purchase and lending transactions denominated in
foreign currencies. Foreign exchange derivative contracts are
recorded as mark to market hedges when the hedged item is a
recorded asset or liability that is revalued in each accounting
period. Mark to market hedge derivatives relating to
intercompany foreign exchange contracts are reported in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as cash flow
from operating activities. As of July 2, 2011, the
U.S. dollar equivalent of commitments to purchase and sell
foreign currencies in the Companys foreign currency mark
to market hedge derivative portfolio was $10,287 and $54,468,
respectively, using the exchange rate at the reporting date.
Cash
Flow Hedges
A hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of
cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset
or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge. The effective
portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative that is
designated as a cash flow hedge is recorded in the
Accumulated other comprehensive loss line of the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. When the impact of the
hedged item is recognized in the income statement, the gain or
loss included in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss is reported on the same line in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income as the hedged item.
Cash Flow
Hedges Interest Rate Derivatives
From time to time, the Company uses interest rate cash flow
hedges in the form of swaps and caps in order to mitigate the
Companys exposure to variability in cash flows for the
future interest payments on a designated portion of floating
rate debt. The effective portion of interest rate hedge gains
and losses deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss is reclassified into earnings as the underlying debt
interest payments are recognized. Interest rate cash flow hedge
derivatives are reported as a component of interest expense and
therefore are reported as cash flow from operating activities
similar to the manner in which cash interest payments are
reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The Company is required under the 2009 Senior Secured Credit
Facility to hedge a portion of its floating rate debt to reduce
interest rate risk caused by floating rate debt issuance. To
comply with this requirement, in 2010, the Company entered into
hedging arrangements whereby it capped the LIBOR interest rate
component on an aggregate of $490,735 of the floating rate debt
under the Floating Rate Senior Notes at 4.262%. The interest
rate cap arrangements, with notional amounts of $240,735 and
$250,000, expire in December 2011.
Cash Flow
Hedges Foreign Currency Derivatives
The Company uses forward exchange and option contracts to reduce
the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term
foreign currency-denominated transactions, foreign
currency-denominated investments, and other known foreign
currency exposures. Gains and losses on these contracts are
intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transaction in
an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from
fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. The effective
portion of foreign exchange hedge gains and losses deferred in
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is reclassified
into earnings as the underlying inventory is sold, using
historical inventory turnover rates. The settlement of foreign
exchange hedge derivative contracts
10
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
related to the purchase of inventory or other hedged items are
reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
as cash flow from operating activities.
Historically, the principal currencies hedged by the Company
include the Euro, Mexican peso, Canadian dollar and Japanese
yen. Forward exchange contracts mature on the anticipated cash
requirement date of the hedged transaction, generally within one
year. As of July 2, 2011, the U.S. dollar equivalent
of commitments to sell foreign currencies in the Companys
foreign currency cash flow hedge derivative portfolio was
$60,334, using the exchange rate at the reporting date.
Cash Flow
Hedges Commodity Derivatives
Cotton is the primary raw material used to manufacture many of
the Companys products and is purchased at market prices.
The Company is able to lock in the cost of cotton reflected in
the price it pays for yarn from its primary yarn suppliers in an
attempt to protect its business from the volatility of the
market price of cotton. In addition, from time to time, the
Company uses commodity financial instruments to hedge the price
of cotton, for which there is a high correlation between the
hedged item and the hedge instrument. Gains and losses on these
contracts are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged
transactions in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility
resulting from fluctuating commodity prices. There were no
amounts outstanding under cotton futures or cotton option
contracts at July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011.
Fair
Values of Derivative Instruments
The fair values of derivative financial instruments recognized
in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Derivative assets hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets hedges
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets non-hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities hedges
|
|
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities non-hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative liability
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,213
|
)
|
|
$
|
(934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Net
Derivative Gain or Loss
The effect of cash flow hedge derivative instruments is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Other Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Loss into Income
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Loss into Income
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
(3,248
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,765
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(1,867
|
)
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,867
|
)
|
|
$
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,265
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Other Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Loss into Income
|
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Loss into Income
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(417
|
)
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
(6,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,622
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(3,263
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(3,266
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7,554
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to reclassify into earnings during the next
12 months a net loss from Accumulated other
comprehensive loss of approximately $4,687. The amounts
deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive loss
associated with a Floating Rate Senior Notes interest rate hedge
that was terminated at the time the Company entered into the
2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility were frozen at the
termination date and will be amortized over the original
remaining term of the interest rate hedge instrument. The
unamortized balance in Accumulated other comprehensive
loss was $10,578 as of July 2, 2011.
The changes in fair value of derivatives excluded from the
Companys effectiveness assessments and the ineffective
portion of the changes in the fair value of derivatives used as
cash flow hedges are reported in Selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income. The Company recognized losses for the
quarter and six months ended July 2, 2011 related to
ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for foreign exchange
contracts of $61 and $63, respectively. The Company recognized
gains (losses) for the quarter and six months ended July 3,
2010 related to ineffectiveness of hedging relationships for
foreign exchange contracts of $(2) and $7, respectively.
12
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
The effect of mark to market hedge derivative instruments on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,573
|
|
|
$
|
(3,086
|
)
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,573
|
|
|
$
|
(3,086
|
)
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
Fair
Value of Assets and Liabilities
|
Fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value, is utilized
for disclosing the fair value of the Companys assets and
liabilities. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs
about which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring
an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of July 2, 2011, the Company held certain financial
assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. These consisted of the
Companys derivative instruments related to interest rates
and foreign exchange rates. The Companys defined benefit
pension plan investments are not required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. The fair values of interest rate
derivatives are determined with pricing models using LIBOR
interest rate curves, spreads, volatilities and other relevant
information developed using market data and are categorized as
Level 2. The fair values of foreign currency derivatives
are determined using the cash flows of the foreign exchange
contract, discount rates to account for the passage of time and
current foreign exchange market data and are categorized as
Level 2.
There were no changes during the quarter ended July 2, 2011
to the Companys valuation techniques used to measure asset
and liability fair values on a recurring basis. There were no
transfers between the three level categories and there were no
Level 3 assets or liabilities measured on a quarterly basis
during the quarter ended July 2, 2011. As of and during the
quarter and six months ended July 2, 2011, the Company did
not have any non-financial assets or liabilities that were
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring or
non-recurring basis.
13
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
The following tables set forth by level within the fair value
hierarchy the Companys financial assets and liabilities
accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities) at Fair Value as of
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,213
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities) at Fair Value as of
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(934
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade
accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts payable
approximated fair value as of July 2, 2011 and
January 1, 2011. The fair value of debt was $2,256,482 and
$2,060,828 as of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011 and
had a carrying value of $2,211,290 and $2,080,735, respectively.
The fair values were estimated using quoted market prices as
provided in secondary markets which consider the Companys
credit risk and market related conditions. The carrying amounts
of the Companys notes payable approximated fair value as
of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, primarily due to
the short-term nature of these instruments.
14
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
The Companys comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
2,908
|
|
|
|
(6,831
|
)
|
|
|
6,771
|
|
|
|
(6,320
|
)
|
Amortization of loss on interest rate hedge, net of tax of
$1,261, $1,880, $2,578 and $3,804, respectively
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
|
3,887
|
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on qualifying cash flow hedges, net
of tax of $(306), $347, $(868) and $231, respectively
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
348
|
|
Amounts amortized into net periodic cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost, net of tax of $3, $3, $6 and $6, respectively
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Actuarial loss, net of tax of $908, $860, $1,816 and $1,720,
respectively
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
92,507
|
|
|
$
|
83,242
|
|
|
$
|
146,988
|
|
|
$
|
124,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective income tax rate was 20% for the
quarter and six months ended July 2, 2011, and (2)% and 7%
for the quarter and six months ended July 3, 2010,
respectively. The higher effective income tax rate for the
quarter and six months ended July 2, 2011 compared to the
quarter and six months ended July 3, 2010 was primarily
attributable to a one-time income tax benefit of approximately
$17,000 and $20,000 for the quarter and six months ended
July 3, 2010, respectively, resulting from the finalization
of tax reviews and audits for amounts that were less than
originally anticipated.
As previously disclosed, the Company and Sara Lee Corporation
(Sara Lee) have disagreed as to the amount of
deferred taxes that should have been attributable to the
Companys United States and Canadian operations on the
Companys opening balance sheet as of September 6,
2006 following its spin-off from Sara Lee. The computation of
this amount is governed by a tax sharing agreement entered into
in connection with the spin off. The Company and Sara Lee have
had differing interpretations of the tax sharing agreement, and,
in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of the
agreement, the Company and Sara Lee submitted that dispute to
arbitration before a three-member tribunal in August 2009. A
hearing was held in August 2010. Based on the Companys
computation of the final amount of deferred taxes for the
Companys opening balance sheet as of September 6,
2006, the amount that the Company expected to collect from Sara
Lee based on the Companys computation of $72,223, which
reflects a preliminary cash installment received from Sara Lee
of $18,000, was included as a receivable in Other current
assets.
On July 1, 2011, the tribunal issued a 2-1 decision in
which the majority disagreed with the Companys
interpretation of the tax sharing agreement and awarded the
Company $3,291, plus interest based on the majoritys
interpretation of the tax sharing agreement. This amount
reflects other payments made or acknowledged to be owed by the
parties under the tax sharing agreement. As a result of the
tribunals decision, the Company recorded a non-cash
transaction that reduced Other current assets and
Additional paid-in capital by $68,523.
15
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Under section 2.12 of the tax sharing agreement with Sara
Lee discussed above, in 2010, the Company recorded a liability
of approximately $15,000 to Sara Lee for amounts related to
income generated prior to the spin off from Sara Lee which were
repatriated in periods since the spin off. The liability is
included in Accounts payable in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 2, 2011 and
January 1, 2011 with the resulting offset recorded as a
reduction to Additional paid-in capital. Except for
the amounts reflected in this Note 10, to the best of the
Companys knowledge, there are no other amounts owed to or
from Sara Lee under the tax sharing agreement.
|
|
(11)
|
Business
Segment Information
|
The Companys operations are managed and reported in five
operating segments, each of which is a reportable segment for
financial reporting purposes: Innerwear, Outerwear, Hosiery,
Direct to Consumer and International. These segments are
organized principally by product category, geographic location
and distribution channel. Each segment has its own management
that is responsible for the operations of the segments
businesses but the segments share a common supply chain and
media and marketing platforms.
The types of products and services from which each reportable
segment derives its revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear sells basic branded products that are replenishment in
nature under the product categories of womens intimate
apparel, mens underwear, kids underwear and socks.
|
|
|
|
Outerwear sells basic branded products that are primarily
seasonal in nature under the product categories of casualwear
and activewear, as well as licensed logo apparel in collegiate
bookstores and other channels.
|
|
|
|
Hosiery sells products in categories such as pantyhose, knee
highs and tights.
|
|
|
|
Direct to Consumer includes the Companys value-based
(outlet) stores and Internet operations which sell
products from the Companys portfolio of leading brands.
The Companys Internet operations are supported by its
catalogs.
|
|
|
|
International primarily relates to the Latin America, Asia,
Canada, Europe and Australia geographic locations which sell
products that span across the Innerwear, Outerwear and Hosiery
reportable segments.
|
The Company evaluates the operating performance of its segments
based upon segment operating profit, which is defined as
operating profit before general corporate expenses and
amortization of trademarks and other identifiable intangibles.
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with
those described in Note 2 to the Companys
consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011. Certain prior year
segment operating profit disclosures have been revised to
conform to the current year presentation. These changes were
primarily the result of the Companys decision to cease
allocating certain compensation related expenses to the segments.
16
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
604,678
|
|
|
$
|
559,250
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,067
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
331,413
|
|
|
|
263,331
|
|
|
|
662,084
|
|
|
|
505,179
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
31,923
|
|
|
|
78,570
|
|
|
|
79,831
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
97,456
|
|
|
|
93,861
|
|
|
|
180,254
|
|
|
|
178,353
|
|
International
|
|
|
157,718
|
|
|
|
127,487
|
|
|
|
284,721
|
|
|
|
230,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
92,552
|
|
|
$
|
93,150
|
|
|
$
|
151,968
|
|
|
$
|
170,647
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
35,918
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
61,423
|
|
|
|
22,685
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
25,673
|
|
|
|
28,001
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
9,396
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
International
|
|
|
17,612
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
37,775
|
|
|
|
25,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit
|
|
|
164,881
|
|
|
|
141,080
|
|
|
|
286,601
|
|
|
|
255,376
|
|
Items not included in segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
(12,796
|
)
|
|
|
(15,273
|
)
|
|
|
(29,054
|
)
|
|
|
(40,731
|
)
|
Amortization of trademarks and other identifiable intangibles
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
(3,002
|
)
|
|
|
(7,236
|
)
|
|
|
(6,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
|
148,468
|
|
|
|
122,805
|
|
|
|
250,311
|
|
|
|
208,517
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
(2,628
|
)
|
|
|
(1,415
|
)
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(39,178
|
)
|
|
|
(36,573
|
)
|
|
|
(80,283
|
)
|
|
|
(74,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
108,476
|
|
|
$
|
83,604
|
|
|
$
|
168,613
|
|
|
$
|
130,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
9,559
|
|
|
$
|
8,367
|
|
|
$
|
18,993
|
|
|
$
|
17,216
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
4,669
|
|
|
|
10,993
|
|
|
|
9,689
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
International
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,108
|
|
|
|
15,807
|
|
|
|
35,399
|
|
|
|
32,358
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
8,736
|
|
|
|
10,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$
|
22,448
|
|
|
$
|
19,893
|
|
|
$
|
44,135
|
|
|
$
|
42,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
8,721
|
|
|
$
|
14,269
|
|
|
$
|
19,695
|
|
|
$
|
27,140
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
9,368
|
|
|
|
18,669
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
|
|
7,353
|
|
International
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,751
|
|
|
|
28,033
|
|
|
|
45,271
|
|
|
|
55,704
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total additions to long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
22,329
|
|
|
$
|
29,875
|
|
|
$
|
47,740
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Consolidating
Financial Information
|
In accordance with the indenture governing the Companys
$500,000 Floating Rate Senior Notes issued on December 14,
2006, the indenture governing the Companys $500,000
8% Senior Notes issued on December 10, 2009 and the
indenture governing the Companys $1,000,000
6.375% Senior Notes issued on November 9, 2010
(together, the Indentures), certain of the
Companys subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys
obligations under the Floating Rate Senior Notes, the
8% Senior Notes and the 6.375% Senior Notes,
respectively. The following presents the condensed consolidating
financial information separately for:
(i) Parent Company, the issuer of the guaranteed
obligations. Parent Company includes Hanesbrands Inc. and its
100% owned operating divisions which are not legal entities, and
excludes its subsidiaries which are legal entities;
(ii) Guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis, as
specified in the Indentures;
(iii) Non-guarantor subsidiaries, on a combined basis;
(iv) Consolidating entries and eliminations representing
adjustments to (a) eliminate intercompany transactions
between or among Parent Company, the guarantor subsidiaries and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries, (b) eliminate intercompany
profit in inventory, (c) eliminate the investments in our
subsidiaries and (d) record consolidating entries; and
(v) Parent Company, on a consolidated basis.
18
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
The Floating Rate Senior Notes, the 8% Senior Notes and the
6.375% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on a joint and several basis by each guarantor
subsidiary, each of which is wholly owned, directly or
indirectly, by Hanesbrands Inc. Each entity in the consolidating
financial information follows the same accounting policies as
described in the consolidated financial statements, except for
the use by the Parent Company and guarantor subsidiaries of the
equity method of accounting to reflect ownership interests in
subsidiaries which are eliminated upon consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,069,718
|
|
|
$
|
170,086
|
|
|
$
|
953,244
|
|
|
$
|
(967,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
796,141
|
|
|
|
78,406
|
|
|
|
852,517
|
|
|
|
(929,071
|
)
|
|
|
797,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273,577
|
|
|
|
91,680
|
|
|
|
100,727
|
|
|
|
(38,744
|
)
|
|
|
427,240
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
211,883
|
|
|
|
32,527
|
|
|
|
35,214
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
278,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
61,694
|
|
|
|
59,153
|
|
|
|
65,513
|
|
|
|
(37,892
|
)
|
|
|
148,468
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
71,642
|
|
|
|
26,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
36,326
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
39,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
96,196
|
|
|
|
85,675
|
|
|
|
62,661
|
|
|
|
(136,056
|
)
|
|
|
108,476
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,414
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
$
|
77,665
|
|
|
$
|
58,391
|
|
|
$
|
(136,056
|
)
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended July 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,031,427
|
|
|
$
|
109,142
|
|
|
$
|
803,854
|
|
|
$
|
(868,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
823,410
|
|
|
|
39,051
|
|
|
|
708,818
|
|
|
|
(870,233
|
)
|
|
|
701,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
208,017
|
|
|
|
70,091
|
|
|
|
95,036
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
374,806
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
201,078
|
|
|
|
22,514
|
|
|
|
28,014
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
252,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
47,577
|
|
|
|
67,022
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
122,805
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
102,586
|
|
|
|
47,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
33,642
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
36,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
73,255
|
|
|
|
94,819
|
|
|
|
64,071
|
|
|
|
(148,541
|
)
|
|
|
83,604
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(12,157
|
)
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
|
|
3,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
$
|
87,794
|
|
|
$
|
60,747
|
|
|
$
|
(148,541
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,025,410
|
|
|
$
|
310,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,858,978
|
|
|
$
|
(1,933,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,557,737
|
|
|
|
144,044
|
|
|
|
1,616,193
|
|
|
|
(1,838,096
|
)
|
|
|
1,479,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
467,673
|
|
|
|
166,455
|
|
|
|
242,785
|
|
|
|
(95,148
|
)
|
|
|
781,765
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
397,476
|
|
|
|
65,878
|
|
|
|
68,949
|
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
531,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
70,197
|
|
|
|
100,577
|
|
|
|
173,836
|
|
|
|
(94,299
|
)
|
|
|
250,311
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
150,866
|
|
|
|
113,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
74,971
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
144,677
|
|
|
|
214,222
|
|
|
|
168,490
|
|
|
|
(358,776
|
)
|
|
|
168,613
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9,786
|
|
|
|
13,874
|
|
|
|
10,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
200,348
|
|
|
$
|
158,428
|
|
|
$
|
(358,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,930,150
|
|
|
$
|
205,316
|
|
|
$
|
1,487,257
|
|
|
$
|
(1,619,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,547,725
|
|
|
|
75,424
|
|
|
|
1,305,974
|
|
|
|
(1,627,667
|
)
|
|
|
1,301,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
382,425
|
|
|
|
129,892
|
|
|
|
181,283
|
|
|
|
8,636
|
|
|
|
702,236
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
388,315
|
|
|
|
48,736
|
|
|
|
55,950
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
493,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(5,890
|
)
|
|
|
81,156
|
|
|
|
125,333
|
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
|
|
208,517
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
188,276
|
|
|
|
84,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(272,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
67,812
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
6,298
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
74,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
110,540
|
|
|
|
165,289
|
|
|
|
119,035
|
|
|
|
(264,449
|
)
|
|
|
130,415
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(11,385
|
)
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
|
$
|
152,653
|
|
|
$
|
111,796
|
|
|
$
|
(264,449
|
)
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,729
|
|
|
$
|
2,790
|
|
|
$
|
33,136
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,655
|
|
Trade accounts receivable less allowances
|
|
|
66,320
|
|
|
|
43,770
|
|
|
|
502,219
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
612,178
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,229,173
|
|
|
|
120,422
|
|
|
|
463,332
|
|
|
|
(172,696
|
)
|
|
|
1,640,231
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
158,469
|
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,360
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
27,682
|
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
|
|
21,561
|
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
57,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,490,373
|
|
|
|
177,754
|
|
|
|
1,007,143
|
|
|
|
(173,541
|
)
|
|
|
2,501,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net
|
|
|
111,847
|
|
|
|
49,283
|
|
|
|
474,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,612
|
|
Trademarks and other identifiable intangibles, net
|
|
|
15,137
|
|
|
|
138,388
|
|
|
|
23,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,531
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
232,882
|
|
|
|
124,214
|
|
|
|
75,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,903
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,669,096
|
|
|
|
1,005,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,674,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(51,807
|
)
|
|
|
422,437
|
|
|
|
256,946
|
|
|
|
(219,575
|
)
|
|
|
408,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,467,528
|
|
|
$
|
1,917,707
|
|
|
$
|
1,837,384
|
|
|
$
|
(3,067,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,154,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
295,134
|
|
|
$
|
16,948
|
|
|
$
|
251,559
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
563,641
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
149,741
|
|
|
|
40,188
|
|
|
|
77,417
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
267,341
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,011
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
444,875
|
|
|
|
57,136
|
|
|
|
571,042
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1,073,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,998,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998,235
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
366,618
|
|
|
|
35,582
|
|
|
|
23,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,809,728
|
|
|
|
92,718
|
|
|
|
594,535
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
3,496,976
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
657,800
|
|
|
|
1,824,989
|
|
|
|
1,242,849
|
|
|
|
(3,067,838
|
)
|
|
|
657,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,467,528
|
|
|
$
|
1,917,707
|
|
|
$
|
1,837,384
|
|
|
$
|
(3,067,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,154,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,535
|
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
24,097
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,671
|
|
Trade accounts receivable less allowances
|
|
|
50,375
|
|
|
|
35,256
|
|
|
|
417,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,243
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
954,073
|
|
|
|
100,435
|
|
|
|
355,908
|
|
|
|
(87,697
|
)
|
|
|
1,322,719
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
160,178
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
(12,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,431
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
95,702
|
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
|
21,646
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
128,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,277,863
|
|
|
|
151,210
|
|
|
|
806,511
|
|
|
|
(87,913
|
)
|
|
|
2,147,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net
|
|
|
118,596
|
|
|
|
47,842
|
|
|
|
464,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,254
|
|
Trademarks and other identifiable intangibles, net
|
|
|
16,006
|
|
|
|
141,635
|
|
|
|
20,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,622
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
232,882
|
|
|
|
124,214
|
|
|
|
73,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,144
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,542,231
|
|
|
|
886,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,428,580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
115,500
|
|
|
|
350,862
|
|
|
|
146,859
|
|
|
|
(210,910
|
)
|
|
|
402,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,303,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,702,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,512,215
|
|
|
$
|
(2,727,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,790,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
243,169
|
|
|
$
|
17,198
|
|
|
$
|
152,002
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,369
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
150,831
|
|
|
|
55,502
|
|
|
|
69,979
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
276,303
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,678
|
|
Current portion of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
394,000
|
|
|
|
72,700
|
|
|
|
362,659
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
829,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,990,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,990,735
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
355,669
|
|
|
|
35,072
|
|
|
|
16,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,740,404
|
|
|
|
107,772
|
|
|
|
379,161
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
3,227,328
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
562,674
|
|
|
|
1,594,340
|
|
|
|
1,133,054
|
|
|
|
(2,727,394
|
)
|
|
|
562,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,303,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,702,112
|
|
|
$
|
1,512,215
|
|
|
$
|
(2,727,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,790,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
123,357
|
|
|
$
|
93,544
|
|
|
$
|
(20,677
|
)
|
|
$
|
(264,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(7,385
|
)
|
|
|
(6,841
|
)
|
|
|
(33,514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,740
|
)
|
Acquisition of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,154
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
12,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,346
|
)
|
|
|
(6,774
|
)
|
|
|
(30,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,012
|
|
Repayments on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287,103
|
)
|
Borrowings on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,727
|
|
Repayments on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,672
|
)
|
Borrowings on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
1,840,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840,000
|
|
Repayments on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
(1,832,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,832,500
|
)
|
Payments to amend credit facilities
|
|
|
(3,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(668
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,757
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
Other
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Net transactions with related entities
|
|
|
(137,748
|
)
|
|
|
(86,019
|
)
|
|
|
(40,710
|
)
|
|
|
264,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(124,817
|
)
|
|
|
(86,019
|
)
|
|
|
59,560
|
|
|
|
264,477
|
|
|
|
113,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,806
|
)
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
9,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
24,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
8,729
|
|
|
$
|
2,790
|
|
|
$
|
33,136
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
HANESBRANDS
INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Guarantor
|
|
|
Non-Guarantor
|
|
|
Entries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
97,968
|
|
|
$
|
89,164
|
|
|
$
|
19,441
|
|
|
$
|
(270,845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,272
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(15,253
|
)
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
(36,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,099
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
44,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,196
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
28,523
|
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
(35,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,745
|
|
Repayments on notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,991
|
)
|
Borrowings on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,406
|
|
Repayments on Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,891
|
)
|
Borrowings on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
1,075,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075,000
|
|
Repayments on Revolving Loan Facility
|
|
|
(939,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(939,500
|
)
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
Repayment of debt under 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
|
(59,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,063
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Net transactions with related entities
|
|
|
(207,363
|
)
|
|
|
(82,329
|
)
|
|
|
18,847
|
|
|
|
270,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(129,363
|
)
|
|
|
(82,329
|
)
|
|
|
17,094
|
|
|
|
270,845
|
|
|
|
76,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,872
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
12,805
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
24,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,933
|
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
|
$
|
25,063
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Please see Forward-Looking Statements in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions
associated with these statements. This discussion should be read
in conjunction with our historical financial statements and
related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes included herein should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year
ended January 1, 2011, which were included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results
of operations for the periods reflected herein are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for
future periods, and our actual results may differ materially
from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors, including but not limited to those
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and those included in the Risk Factors section and
elsewhere in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a consumer goods company with a portfolio of leading
apparel brands, including Hanes, Champion, Playtex, Bali,
Leggs, Just My Size, barely there, Wonderbra,
Stedman, Outer Banks, Zorba, Rinbros, Duofold and Gear
for Sports. We design, manufacture, source and sell a broad
range of basic apparel such as T-shirts, bras, panties,
mens underwear, kids underwear, casualwear,
activewear, socks and hosiery.
Our operations are managed and reported in five operating
segments, each of which is a reportable segment for financial
reporting purposes: Innerwear, Outerwear, Hosiery, Direct to
Consumer and International. These segments are organized
principally by product category, geographic location and
distribution channel. Each segment has its own management that
is responsible for the operations of the segments
businesses but the segments share a common supply chain and
media and marketing platforms. Certain prior year segment
operating profit disclosures have been revised to conform to the
current year presentation. These changes were primarily the
result of our decision to cease allocating certain compensation
related expenses to the segments.
Seasonality
and Other Factors
Our operating results are subject to some variability due to
seasonality and other factors. Generally, our diverse range of
product offerings helps mitigate the impact of seasonal changes
in demand for certain items. Sales are typically higher in the
last two quarters (July to December) of each fiscal year. Socks,
hosiery and fleece products generally have higher sales during
this period as a result of cooler weather,
back-to-school
shopping and holidays. Sales levels in any period are also
impacted by customers decisions to increase or decrease
their inventory levels in response to anticipated consumer
demand. Our customers may cancel orders, change delivery
schedules or change the mix of products ordered with minimal
notice to us. Media, advertising and promotion expenses may vary
from period to period during a fiscal year depending on the
timing of our advertising campaigns for retail selling seasons
and product introductions.
Although the majority of our products are replenishment in
nature and tend to be purchased by consumers on a planned,
rather than on an impulse, basis, our sales are impacted by
discretionary spending by consumers. Discretionary spending is
affected by many factors, including, among others, general
business conditions, interest rates, inflation, consumer debt
levels, the availability of consumer credit, currency exchange
rates, taxation, electricity power rates, gasoline prices,
unemployment trends and other matters that influence consumer
confidence and spending. Many of these factors are outside our
control. Consumers purchases of discretionary items,
including our products, could decline during periods when
disposable income is lower, when prices increase in response to
rising costs, or in periods of actual or perceived unfavorable
economic conditions. These consumers may choose to purchase
fewer of our products or to purchase lower-priced products of
our competitors in response to higher prices for our products,
or may choose not to purchase our products at prices that
reflect our price increases that become effective from time to
time.
25
Outlook
for 2011
After a strong performance in 2010, which continued in the first
half of 2011, in an uncertain and volatile economic environment,
we expect continued double-digit growth in 2011 with projected
net sales of approximately $4.9 billion to
$5.0 billion compared to $4.33 billion in 2010. The
primary drivers of this growth are expected to be price
increases, partially offset by demand elasticity, a full year of
the Gear for Sports acquisition, net shelf-space gains and
increases in consumer spending. The high end and low end of the
guidance ranges represent consumer spending and demand
elasticity that are better than or worse than, respectively, our
baseline assumptions.
Because of systemic cost inflation in 2011 as described below,
particularly for cotton, energy and labor, we have taken, and
expect to continue throughout 2011 to take, price increases as
warranted by cost inflation. The timing and frequency of price
increases will vary by product category, channel of trade, and
country, with some increases as frequently as quarterly. The
magnitude of price increases also will vary by product category.
Demand elasticity effects, which could be significant for price
increases implemented later in 2011, should be manageable and
are expected to have a muted impact in 2011.
For 2011, we believe we know the majority of our costs, with
cotton prices locked in for the full year. Our current 2011
earnings expectations assume we will realize efficiency savings
from our supply chain optimization of approximately
$40 million in 2011. Our expectations also assume that we
will eliminate the majority of excess 2010 freight and other
distribution costs related to servicing sales growth of
$30 million to $35 million, of which approximately
$5 million to $10 million and $25 million to
$30 million will be eliminated in the third quarter of 2011
and fourth quarter of 2011, respectively. Approximately
two-thirds of the eliminated excess costs will come from gross
profit and one-third will come from selling, general and
administrative expenses. Our earnings expectations also assume
continued investment in trade and media spending consistent with
our historical rate of $90 million to $100 million,
slightly higher interest expense, and a higher full-year tax
rate that could range from a percentage in the teens to the low
20s.
As a result of the cost inflation and higher product pricing, we
expect a negative impact on our cash flow from higher working
capital, in particular higher accounts receivable and
inventories, partially offset by improved inventory turns and
higher accounts payable. We typically use cash for the first
half of the year and generate most of our cash flow in the
second half of the year.
Between July 2, 2011 and the end of 2011, we expect inventory
units on hand to decrease, however, as a result of high
inflationary costs, our inventory dollars may not peak until the
third quarter of 2011.
Business
and Industry Trends
Inflation
and Changing Prices
The economic environment in which we are operating continues to
be uncertain and volatile, which could have unanticipated
adverse effects on our business during 2011 and beyond. We are
seeing a sustained increase in various input costs, such as
cotton and oil-related materials, utilities, freight and wages,
which impacted our results in 2010 and will continue to do so
throughout 2011. The estimated impact of cost inflation could be
approximately $300 million higher in 2011 over 2010.
Although we have sold our yarn operations and nearly 40% of our
business, such as bras, sheer hosiery and portions of our
activewear categories, is not cotton-based, we are still exposed
to fluctuations in the cost of cotton. Rising demand for cotton
resulting from the economic recovery, weather-related supply
disruptions, significant declines in U.S. inventory and a
sharp rise in the futures market for cotton caused cotton prices
to surge upward during 2010 and early 2011. During 2010, cotton
prices hit their highest levels in 140 years. Increases in
the cost of cotton can result in higher costs in the price we
pay for yarn from our large-scale yarn suppliers. Our costs for
cotton yarn and cotton-based textiles vary based upon the
fluctuating cost of cotton, which is affected by, among other
factors, weather, consumer demand, speculation on the
commodities market, the relative valuations and fluctuations of
the currencies of producer versus consumer countries and other
factors that are generally unpredictable and beyond our control.
We are able to lock in the cost of cotton reflected in the price
we pay for yarn from our primary yarn suppliers in an attempt to
protect our business
26
from the volatility of the market price of cotton. However, our
business can be affected by dramatic movements in cotton prices.
The first and second quarters of 2011 reflect an average cost of
83 cents per pound. After taking into consideration the cotton
costs currently in our finished goods inventory and cotton
prices we have locked in, we expect the average cost of cotton
will continue to increase in the second half of 2011 and exceed
$1.00 per pound for the full year, which would have a negative
impact of approximately $150 million when compared to 2010.
These amounts do not include the impact of cotton costs on the
cost of sourced goods.
Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing
costs of materials and labor may impact our ability to maintain
satisfactory margins. For example, the cost of the materials
that are used in our manufacturing process, such as oil-related
commodities and other raw materials, such as dyes and chemicals,
and other costs, such as fuel, energy and utility costs, can
fluctuate as a result of inflation and other factors. Costs
incurred for materials and labor are capitalized into inventory
and impact our results as the inventory is sold. In addition, a
significant portion of our products are manufactured in other
countries and declines in the value of the U.S. dollar may
result in higher manufacturing costs. Increases in inflation may
not be matched by rises in income, which also could have a
negative impact on spending.
Given the systemic cost inflation that the apparel industry is
currently experiencing, many apparel retailers and manufacturers
have announced they are implementing price increases in 2011 in
order to maintain satisfactory margins. Higher raw material
costs, including cotton, and higher labor costs overseas are the
primary reasons that price increases are needed to manage the
inflated costs. If we incur increased costs for materials,
including cotton, and labor that we are unable to recoup through
price increases or improved efficiencies, or if consumer
spending declines, our business, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Other
Business and Industry Trends
The basic apparel market is highly competitive and evolving
rapidly. Competition is generally based upon brand name
recognition, price, product quality, selection, service and
purchasing convenience. The majority of our core styles continue
from year to year, with variations only in color, fabric or
design details. Some products, however, such as intimate
apparel, activewear and sheer hosiery, do have more of an
emphasis on style and innovation. Our businesses face
competition from other large corporations and foreign
manufacturers, as well as smaller companies, department stores,
specialty stores and other retailers that market and sell basic
apparel products under private labels that compete directly with
our brands.
Anticipating changes in and managing our operations in response
to consumer preferences remains an important element of our
business. In recent years, we have experienced changes in our
net sales and cash flows in accordance with changes in consumer
preferences and trends. For example, we expect the trend of
declining hosiery sales to continue consistent with the overall
decline in the industry and with shifts in consumer preferences.
The Hosiery segment only comprised 4% of our net sales in 2010
however, and as a result, the decline in the Hosiery segment has
not had a significant impact on our net sales, revenues or cash
flows. Generally, we manage the Hosiery segment for cash,
placing an emphasis on reducing our cost structure and managing
cash efficiently.
Economic
Trends and other Developments that Impact our Business
We are operating in an uncertain and volatile economic
environment, which could have unanticipated adverse effects on
our business. While there has been a modest rebound in consumer
spending, we also have experienced substantial pressure on
profitability due to the economic climate, such as higher
cotton, energy and labor costs. Rising demand for cotton
resulting from the economic recovery, weather-related supply
disruptions, significant declines in U.S. inventory and a
sharp rise in the futures market for cotton have caused cotton
prices to surge upward. Because of systemic cost inflation in
2011, particularly for cotton, energy and labor, we have taken,
and expect to continue throughout 2011 to take, price increases
as warranted by cost inflation. The timing and frequency of
price increases will vary by product category, channel of trade,
and country, with some increases as frequently as quarterly. The
magnitude of price increases also will vary by
27
product category. Demand elasticity effects, which could be
significant for price increases implemented later in the year,
should be manageable and are expected to have a muted impact in
2011.
In March 2011, a severe earthquake occurred off the northeast
coast of Japan, which was followed by a tsunami, other
earthquakes and other related events. All of our employees in
Japan were reported safe and our office in Tokyo was not
damaged. However, there can be no assurances that future
operations and revenue from our business in Japan may not be
seriously affected by these events and their aftermath. The
disaster in Japan may also result in a downturn in the Japanese
economy as a whole. These occurring or potential events may
seriously damage our ability to conduct business in Japan or, in
the worst case, cause operations in Japan to completely cease
with our business suffering a material downturn. However, given
that our business in Japan is a relatively small part of our
business, representing approximately 2% of our consolidated net
sales, we do not anticipate a material adverse impact on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Highlights
from the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended July 2,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales in the second quarter of 2011 were
$1.23 billion, compared with $1.08 billion in the same
quarter of 2010, representing a 13.9% increase. Total net sales
in the first six months of 2011 were $2.26 billion,
compared with $2.00 billion in the same period of 2010,
representing a 12.9% increase.
|
|
|
|
Operating profit was $148 million in the second quarter of
2011, compared with $123 million in the same quarter of
2010. As a percent of sales, operating profit was 12.1% in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to 11.4% in the same quarter of
2010. The operating margin of 12.1% in the second quarter of
2011 is the highest since our spin off in September 2006.
Operating profit was $250 million in the first six months
of 2011, compared with $209 million in the same period of
2010. As a percent of sales, operating profit was 11.1% in the
first six months of 2011 compared to 10.4% in the same period of
2010.
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share were $0.87 in the second quarter of
2011, compared with $0.87 in the same quarter of 2010. Diluted
earnings per share were $1.36 in the first six months of 2011,
compared with $1.25 in the same period of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Gross capital expenditures were $48 million during the
first six months of 2011, compared with $58 million in the
same period of 2010. Proceeds from sales of assets were
$12 million in the first six months of 2011 and
$45 million in the same period of 2010.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Results of Operations Second Quarter
Ended July 2, 2011 Compared with Second Quarter Ended
July 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Higher
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
|
$
|
149,381
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
797,993
|
|
|
|
701,046
|
|
|
|
96,947
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
427,240
|
|
|
|
374,806
|
|
|
|
52,434
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
278,772
|
|
|
|
252,001
|
|
|
|
26,771
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
148,468
|
|
|
|
122,805
|
|
|
|
25,663
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
(69.0
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
39,178
|
|
|
|
36,573
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
108,476
|
|
|
|
83,604
|
|
|
|
24,872
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Net
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
|
$
|
149,381
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
Consolidated net sales were higher by $149 million or 14%
in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of
2010. The second quarter of 2011 is our sixth consecutive
quarter of growth, reflecting net price increases, net sales
from Gear for Sports, which was acquired in the fourth quarter
of 2010, continued space gains at retailers, positive retail
sell-through and inventory restocking at retail. Gear for Sports
contributed approximately 6% sales growth, while 6% was driven
by net price increases and 2% related to space gains, retailer
inventory restocking, positive retail sell-through and foreign
currency exchange rates.
All of our segments demonstrated growth in net sales, and
Outerwear and International delivered high double digit sales
growth. Outerwear, Innerwear, International, Direct to Consumer
and Hosiery segment net sales were higher by $68 million
(26%), $45 million (8%), $30 million (24%),
$4 million (4%) and $2 million (6%), respectively, in
the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of
2010. Outerwears segment net sales include Gear for
Sports, which contributed 23 percentage points of the
segments growth for the second quarter of 2011.
International segment net sales were higher by 24% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010,
primarily as a result of sales growth in Asia, Latin America,
Australia and Europe, reflecting net price increases, space
gains and a favorable impact of $12 million related to
foreign currency exchange rates due to the strengthening of the
Euro, Japanese yen, Brazilian real, Mexican peso and Canadian
dollar, compared to the U.S. dollar. International segment
net sales were higher by 14% in the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010 after excluding the
impact of foreign exchange rates on currency.
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
427,240
|
|
|
$
|
374,806
|
|
|
$
|
52,434
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
As a percent of net sales, our gross profit was 34.9% in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to 34.8% in the second quarter
of 2010. Our gross profit was higher by $52 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
The higher gross profit was primarily attributable to higher
gross profit of $31 million from the Outerwear segment, of
which $22 million was attributable to Gear for Sports which
was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2010, $10 million
from the Innerwear segment and $10 million from the
International segment.
Our results in the second quarter of 2011 benefited primarily
from gross profit from Gear for Sports, net price increases,
higher sales volumes and efficiency savings from our supply
chain optimization and were negatively impacted by cost
inflation, particularly cotton and energy and oil-related
materials.
The higher gross profit was primarily due to higher net product
pricing of $66 million, higher sales volume of
$30 million, efficiency savings related to our supply chain
optimization of $12 million, a favorable impact related to
foreign currency exchange rates of $4 million and favorable
product sales mix of $2 million. The favorable impact of
foreign currency exchange rates in our International segment was
primarily due to the strengthening of the Euro, Japanese yen,
Brazilian real, Mexican peso and Canadian dollar compared to the
U.S. dollar.
The higher net product pricing, which includes the impact of
$20 million of higher sales incentives, relates to price
increases we have taken in order to maintain historical
profitability levels given the input-cost environment,
especially related to our more cotton-intensive products.
Because of systemic cost inflation in 2011, particularly for
cotton, energy and labor, we have taken, and expect to continue
throughout 2011 to take, price increases as
29
warranted by cost inflation. Our sales incentives were higher in
dollars due to higher sales volume, and as a percentage of
sales, sales incentives were only slightly higher compared to
the second quarter of 2010.
Our gross profit was negatively impacted by $51 million of
higher input costs and higher other manufacturing costs of
$12 million primarily related to higher volume and freight
costs. The higher input costs were primarily attributable to
higher cotton costs of $20 million related to finished
goods manufactured internally in our facilities, vendor price
increases, higher wages and higher costs related to energy and
oil-related materials. The higher other manufacturing costs of
$12 million is net of the elimination of $3 million of
excess 2010 costs related to servicing sales growth.
The average cotton price reflected in our results was 83 cents
per pound in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 61 cents per
pound in the second quarter of 2010. After taking into
consideration the cotton costs currently included in our
finished goods inventory and cotton prices we have locked in, we
expect the average cost of cotton to continue to increase
throughout the full year of 2011. These amounts do not include
the impact of cotton costs on the cost of sourced goods. We
continue to see higher prices for cotton and oil-related
materials, which will impact our results for the remainder of
2011.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
278,772
|
|
|
$
|
252,001
|
|
|
$
|
26,771
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were
$27 million higher in the second quarter of 2011 compared
to the second quarter of 2010. The higher selling, general and
administrative expenses were impacted by incremental costs of
$13 million, which are included in the amounts discussed
below, resulting from the acquisition of Gear for Sports in the
fourth quarter of 2010. As a percent of net sales our selling,
general and administrative expenses were 22.8% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to 23.4% in the second quarter of 2010.
We incurred higher selling and other marketing expenses of
$12 million and higher distribution expenses of
$6 million, partially offset by lower stock compensation
expense of $2 million in the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010. The higher selling and
other marketing expenses were primarily due to higher sales
volumes and the incremental costs attributable to Gear for
Sports. The higher distribution expenses of $6 million were
attributable to $8 million of higher costs related to
higher sales volumes and incremental costs to implement our
price increases, partially offset by the elimination of
$2 million of excess 2010 costs related to servicing sales
growth.
Our media related media, advertising and promotion
(MAP) expenses and non-media related MAP expenses
were higher by $5 million and $2 million,
respectively, during the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010. MAP expenses may vary from period to
period during a fiscal year depending on the timing of our
advertising campaigns for retail selling seasons and product
introductions.
We also incurred higher expenses of $2 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 as
a result of opening new retail stores or expanding existing
stores. We opened one retail store and expanded two existing
retail stores during the second quarter of 2011.
Changes due to foreign currency exchange rates, which are
included in the impact of the changes discussed above, resulted
in higher selling, general and administrative expenses of
$2 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010.
Operating
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
148,468
|
|
|
$
|
122,805
|
|
|
$
|
25,663
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
30
Operating profit was higher in the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010 as a result of higher
gross profit of $52 million, partially offset by higher
selling, general and administrative expenses of
$27 million. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates had
a favorable impact on operating profit of $2 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
Other
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
$
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
(69.0
|
)%
|
During the second quarter of 2011, we incurred charges of
$1 million for funding fees associated with the sales of
certain trade accounts receivable to financial institutions.
During the second quarter of 2010, we wrote off unamortized debt
issuance costs and incurred charges for funding fees associated
with the sales of certain trade accounts receivable to financial
institutions, which combined totaled $3 million. The
write-off related to unamortized debt issuance costs resulted
from the repayment of $57 million of principal under the
senior secured credit facility that we entered into in 2006 and
amended and restated in 2009 (as amended and restated, the
2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility).
Interest
Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
39,178
|
|
|
$
|
36,573
|
|
|
$
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Interest expense, net was higher by $3 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
The higher interest expense was primarily attributable to higher
outstanding debt balances that increased interest expense by
$4 million. In addition, the refinancing of our debt
structure in November 2010, which included the sale of our
$1 billion 6.375% Senior Notes due 2020 (the
6.375% Senior Notes), and the amendment of the
2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility in February 2011, together
with a lower London Interbank Offered Rate, or
LIBOR, combined caused a net decrease in interest
expense in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second
quarter of 2010 of $1 million.
Our weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was
5.55% during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 5.44% in the
second quarter of 2010.
Income
Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
21,694
|
|
|
$
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Our effective income tax rate was 20% in the second quarter of
2011 compared to (2)% in the second quarter of 2010. The higher
effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010 was primarily
attributable to a one-time benefit of $17 million in the
second quarter of 2010 resulting from the finalization of tax
reviews and audits for amounts that were less than originally
anticipated.
31
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
86,782
|
|
|
$
|
85,412
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Net income for the second quarter of 2011 was higher than the
second quarter of 2010 primarily due to higher operating profit
of $26 million and lower other expenses of $2 million,
partially offset by higher income tax expense of
$24 million and higher interest expense of $3 million.
Operating
Results by Business Segment Second Quarter Ended
July 2, 2011 Compared with Second Quarter Ended
July 3, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Higher
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
604,678
|
|
|
$
|
559,250
|
|
|
$
|
45,428
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
331,413
|
|
|
|
263,331
|
|
|
|
68,082
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
31,923
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
97,456
|
|
|
|
93,861
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
International
|
|
|
157,718
|
|
|
|
127,487
|
|
|
|
30,231
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,225,233
|
|
|
$
|
1,075,852
|
|
|
$
|
149,381
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
92,552
|
|
|
$
|
93,150
|
|
|
$
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
35,918
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
18,733
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
9,396
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
International
|
|
|
17,612
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit
|
|
|
164,881
|
|
|
|
141,080
|
|
|
|
23,801
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
Items not included in segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
(12,796
|
)
|
|
|
(15,273
|
)
|
|
|
(2,477
|
)
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
Amortization of trademarks and other intangibles
|
|
|
(3,617
|
)
|
|
|
(3,002
|
)
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
|
148,468
|
|
|
|
122,805
|
|
|
|
25,663
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
(2,628
|
)
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
(69.0
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(39,178
|
)
|
|
|
(36,573
|
)
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
108,476
|
|
|
$
|
83,604
|
|
|
$
|
24,872
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of the selling, general and administrative
expenses in each segment is an allocation of our consolidated
selling, general and administrative expenses, however certain
expenses that are specifically identifiable to a segment are
charged directly to such segment. Certain prior year segment
selling, general and administrative expenses have been revised
to conform to the current year presentation. These changes were
primarily the result of our decision to cease allocating certain
compensation related expenses to the segments. Other than this
change, the allocation methodology for the consolidated selling,
general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of
2011 was consistent with the second quarter of 2010. Our
consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses before
segment allocations were $27 million higher in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
32
Innerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
604,678
|
|
|
$
|
559,250
|
|
|
$
|
45,428
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
92,552
|
|
|
|
93,150
|
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Overall net sales in the Innerwear segment were higher by
$45 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010, primarily due to stronger net sales in
our male underwear and socks product categories.
Net sales in the male underwear product category were 15% or
$39 million higher in the second quarter of 2011 compared
to the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to net price
increases, retailer inventory restocking and space gains in the
discount retail and department store channels.
Higher net sales of $6 million in our socks product
category reflect higher Hanes brand net sales of
$8 million, partially offset by lower Champion brand
net sales of $2 million in the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010. The higher Hanes
brand net sales were primarily due to stronger sales at
retail and net price increases and the lower Champion
brand net sales were primarily attributable to the loss of a
seasonal program.
Intimate apparel net sales were slightly higher in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. Our
panties category net sales were higher by $10 million
primarily due to net price increases and retailer inventory
restocking. Our bra category net sales were $10 million
lower primarily due to retailer inventory replenishment timing
and lower sales at retail, partially offset by net price
increases. From a brand perspective, our net sales were higher
in our Hanes brand by $3 million and in our smaller
brands (barely there, Just My Size and
Wonderbra) by $3 million, offset by lower net sales
in our Bali brand of $4 million and in our
Playtex brand of $1 million.
Innerwear segment gross profit was higher by $10 million in
the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of
2010. The higher gross profit was primarily due to higher net
product pricing of $30 million, which includes the impact
of higher sales incentives of $19 million, higher sales
volume of $8 million, efficiency savings related to our
supply chain optimization of $6 million and lower excess
and obsolete inventory costs of $2 million. These factors
were offset by $25 million of higher input costs such as
cotton costs related to finished goods manufactured internally
in our facilities, vendor prices, wages and energy and
oil-related materials and higher other manufacturing costs of
$11 million primarily related to higher volume and freight
costs.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Innerwear
segment was 33.2% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to
34.2% in the second quarter of 2010.
Innerwear segment operating profit was slightly lower in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010
primarily as a result of higher media related MAP expenses of
$5 million, higher distribution expenses of $4 million
related to higher sales volumes and incremental costs to
implement our price increases partially offset by the
elimination of excess 2010 costs related to servicing sales
growth and higher selling and other marketing expenses of
$1 million, partially offset by higher gross profit.
Outerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
331,413
|
|
|
$
|
263,331
|
|
|
$
|
68,082
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
35,918
|
|
|
|
17,185
|
|
|
|
18,733
|
|
|
|
109.0
|
|
Outerwear segment net sales were higher by $68 million or
26% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter
of 2010. Outerwears segment net sales include the impact
of Gear for Sports, which was
33
acquired in the fourth quarter of 2010 and contributed
$61 million or 23 percentage points of the
segments 26% net sales growth and $22 million of
gross profit for the second quarter of 2011. The Gear for Sports
business includes sales of licensed logo apparel in collegiate
bookstores and other channels.
Our Champion brand activewear net sales were higher by
$21 million or 19% due to stronger sales at retail in the
mass merchant and wholesale club channels and space gains in the
department store and wholesale club channels. Our Champion
brand has achieved continued growth by focusing on the fast
growing active demographic with a unique moderate price
positioning.
Our casualwear category net sales were higher in the wholesale
channel by $9 million and lower in the retail channel by
$22 million. The higher net sales in the wholesale
casualwear channel of 9% were primarily due to net price
increases, partially offset by lower sales at retail by
embellishers and wholesalers. The lower net sales in the retail
casualwear channel were impacted by a shift in shipments from
April to March in 2011 as compared to 2010 and lower sales at
retail.
Outerwear segment gross profit was higher by $31 million in
the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of
2010. The higher gross profit was primarily due to higher net
product pricing of $20 million, which includes the impact
of higher sales incentives of $3 million, favorable product
sales mix of $15 million, higher sales volume of
$12 million and efficiency savings related to our supply
chain optimization of $5 million. These lower costs were
partially offset by $19 million of higher input costs such
as cotton costs related to finished goods manufactured
internally in our facilities, vendor prices, wages and energy
and oil-related materials.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Outerwear
segment was 28.0% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to
23.4% in the second quarter of 2010.
Outerwear segment operating profit was higher in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 primarily
as a result of higher gross profit, partially offset by higher
selling and other marketing expenses of $8 million, higher
distribution expenses of $1 million and higher non-media
related MAP expenses of $1 million. The higher selling and
other marketing expenses were primarily due to higher sales
volumes and the incremental costs resulting from the acquisition
of Gear for Sports.
Hosiery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
33,968
|
|
|
$
|
31,923
|
|
|
$
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Net sales in the Hosiery segment were higher by $2 million
or 6%, which was primarily due to higher net sales of our
Hanes brand in the national chain and mass merchant
channels and higher net sales of the DKNY brand in the
wholesale club channel. While net sales were higher in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010,
the hosiery category has been in a state of consistent decline
for the past decade, as the trend toward casual dress reduced
demand for sheer hosiery. Generally, we manage the Hosiery
segment for cash, placing an emphasis on reducing our cost
structure and managing cash efficiently.
Hosiery segment gross profit was lower by $1 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
The lower gross profit for the second quarter of 2011 compared
to the second quarter of 2010 was primarily the result of higher
other manufacturing costs of $2 million and unfavorable
product sales mix of $1 million, partially offset by lower
sales incentives of $2 million and lower excess and
obsolete inventory costs of $1 million.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Hosiery
segment was 46.2% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to
51.1% in the second quarter of 2010.
Hosiery segment operating profit was higher in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 primarily
as a result of lower distribution expenses of $1 million,
partially offset by lower gross profit.
34
Direct
to Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
97,456
|
|
|
$
|
93,861
|
|
|
$
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
9,396
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Direct to Consumer segment net sales were higher by
$4 million or 4% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to
the second quarter of 2010 due to higher net sales related to
our Internet operations of $2 million and higher net sales
in our outlet stores of $2 million. Comparable store sales
were 3% higher in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010.
Direct to Consumer segment gross profit was higher by
$2 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010 primarily due to higher net product
pricing of $2 million. As a percent of segment net sales,
gross profit in the Direct to Consumer segment was 62.1% in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to 62.5% in the second quarter
of 2010.
Direct to Consumer segment operating profit was higher in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010
primarily as a result of higher gross profit and lower
distribution expenses of $1 million, partially offset by
higher expenses of $2 million as a result of opening new
retail stores or expanding existing stores.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
157,718
|
|
|
$
|
127,487
|
|
|
$
|
30,231
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
17,612
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
Overall net sales in the International segment were higher by
$30 million or 24% in the second quarter of 2011 compared
to the second quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of sales
growth in Asia, Latin America, Australia and Europe, reflecting
net price increases, space gains and a favorable impact of
$12 million related to foreign currency exchange rates.
Excluding the impact of foreign exchange rates on currency,
International segment net sales were higher by 14% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. The
favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates in our
International segment was primarily due to the strengthening of
the Euro, Japanese yen, Brazilian real, Mexican peso and
Canadian dollar, compared to the U.S. dollar.
During the second quarter of 2011, we experienced higher net
sales, in each case excluding the impact of foreign currency
exchange rates, in our activewear and male underwear businesses
in Asia of $6 million, in our activewear business in
Australia of $5 million, which benefited from the
acquisition of the assets of the TNF Group Unit Trust from TNF
Group Pty Ltd as trustee and of Player Sportswear Unit Trust
from Player Sportswear Pty Ltd as trustee (collectively,
TNF) in April 2011, in our male underwear and
intimate apparel businesses in Latin America of $5 million
and in our casualwear business in Europe of $4 million,
partially offset by lower net sales in our intimate apparel
business in Canada of $3 million. Net sales in our
businesses in China and India each grew over 50% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010. In
certain international markets we are focusing on adopting global
designs for some product categories to quickly launch new styles
to expand our market position. The higher net sales reflect our
successful efforts to improve our strong positions.
International segment gross profit was higher by
$10 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
second quarter of 2010. The higher gross profit was primarily a
result of higher net product pricing of $11 million, which
includes the impact of higher sales incentives of
$1 million, a favorable impact related to foreign currency
exchange rates of $4 million and higher sales volume of
$2 million, partially offset by vendor price increases of
$5 million, unfavorable product sales mix of
$2 million and higher excess and obsolete inventory costs
of $2 million.
35
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the
International segment was 37.1% in the second quarter of 2011
compared to 38.0% in the second quarter of 2010.
International segment operating profit was higher in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010, which
was primarily attributable to the higher gross profit, partially
offset by higher selling and other marketing expenses of
$3 million and higher distribution expenses of
$3 million. The changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
which are included in the impact on gross profit above, had a
favorable impact on operating profit of $2 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.
General
Corporate Expenses
General corporate expenses were lower in the second quarter of
2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 primarily due to
lower stock compensation expense of $2 million.
Condensed
Consolidated Results of Operations Six Months Ended
July 2, 2011 Compared with Six Months Ended July 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Higher
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
|
$
|
257,951
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,479,878
|
|
|
|
1,301,456
|
|
|
|
178,422
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
781,765
|
|
|
|
702,236
|
|
|
|
79,529
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
531,454
|
|
|
|
493,719
|
|
|
|
37,735
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
250,311
|
|
|
|
208,517
|
|
|
|
41,794
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
|
(64.9
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
80,283
|
|
|
|
74,068
|
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
168,613
|
|
|
|
130,415
|
|
|
|
38,198
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,722
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
25,232
|
|
|
|
297.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
|
$
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
|
$
|
257,951
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Consolidated net sales were higher by $258 million or 13%
in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010, reflecting net sales
from Gear for Sports, which was acquired in the fourth quarter
of 2010, net price increases, continued space gains at
retailers, positive retail sell-through and inventory restocking
at retail. Gear for Sports contributed approximately 5% sales
growth, while 5% was driven by net price increases and 3% was
related to space gains, retailer inventory restocking, positive
retailer sell-through and foreign currency exchange rates.
Our three largest segments demonstrated growth in net sales, and
Outerwear and International delivered high double digit sales
growth. Outerwear, International, Innerwear and Direct to
Consumer segment net sales were higher by $157 million
(31%), $54 million (24%), $46 million (5%) and
$2 million (1%), respectively, in the six months of 2011
compared to 2010. Outerwears segment net sales include
Gear for Sports, which contributed 21 percentage points of
the segments growth for the six months of 2011. Hosiery
segment net sales were lower by $1 million (2%) in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010.
International segment net sales were higher by 24% in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010, primarily as a result of sales
growth in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Australia, reflecting
net price
36
increases, space gains and a favorable impact of
$18 million related to foreign currency exchange rates due
to the strengthening of the Japanese yen, Euro, Canadian dollar,
Brazilian real and Mexican peso compared to the
U.S. dollar. International segment net sales were higher by
16% in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010 after excluding
the impact of foreign exchange rates on currency.
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
781,765
|
|
|
$
|
702,236
|
|
|
$
|
79,529
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
As a percent of net sales, our gross profit was 34.6% in the six
months of 2011 compared to 35.0% in the six months of 2010. Our
gross profit was higher by $80 million in the six months of
2011 compared to the six months of 2010. The higher gross profit
was primarily attributable to higher gross profit of
$61 million from the Outerwear segment, of which
$37 million was attributable to Gear for Sports which was
acquired in the fourth quarter of 2010, and $22 million
from the International segment, partially offset by lower gross
profit in the Innerwear segment of $7 million.
Our results in the six months of 2011 benefited primarily from
gross profit from Gear for Sports, net price increases, higher
sales volumes and efficiency savings from our supply chain
optimization and were negatively impacted by cost inflation,
particularly cotton and energy and oil-related materials.
The higher gross profit was primarily due to higher net product
pricing of $91 million, higher sales volume of
$57 million, efficiency savings related to our supply chain
optimization of $24 million, a favorable impact related to
foreign currency exchange rates of $7 million, a one-time
termination fee of $5 million related to a royalty license
agreement, favorable product sales mix of $3 million and
lower
start-up and
shut-down costs of $3 million associated with the
consolidation and globalization of our supply chain. The
favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates in our
International segment was primarily due to the strengthening of
the Japanese yen, Euro, Canadian dollar, Brazilian real and
Mexican peso, compared to the U.S. dollar.
The higher net product pricing, which includes the impact of
$37 million of higher sales incentives, relates to price
increases we have taken in order to maintain historical
profitability levels given the input-cost environment,
especially related to our more cotton-intensive products.
Because of systemic cost inflation in 2011, particularly for
cotton, energy and labor, we have taken, and expect to continue
throughout 2011 to take, price increases as warranted by cost
inflation. Our sales incentives were higher in dollars due to
higher sales volume, and as a percentage of sales, sales
incentives were only slightly higher compared to 2010.
Our gross profit was negatively impacted by $86 million of
higher input costs, higher other manufacturing costs of
$13 million primarily related to higher volume and freight
costs, higher excess and obsolete inventory costs of
$7 million and higher costs of $6 million primarily
related to incremental costs to service higher demand. The
higher input costs were primarily attributable to higher cotton
costs of $44 million related to finished goods manufactured
internally in our facilities, vendor price increases and higher
costs related to energy and oil-related materials. Our excess
and obsolete inventory costs were higher primarily in our
intimate apparel categories as a result of specific retailer
program discontinuations.
The average cotton price reflected in our results was 83 cents
per pound in the six months of 2011 compared to 54 cents per
pound in the six months of 2010. After taking into consideration
the cotton costs currently included in our finished goods
inventory and cotton prices we have locked in, we expect the
average cost of cotton to continue to increase throughout the
full year of 2011. These amounts do not include the impact of
cotton costs on the cost of sourced goods. We continue to see
higher prices for cotton and oil-related materials, which will
impact our results for the remainder of 2011.
37
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
531,454
|
|
|
$
|
493,719
|
|
|
$
|
37,735
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were
$38 million higher in the six months of 2011 compared to
2010. The higher selling, general and administrative expenses
were impacted by incremental costs of $25 million, which
are included in the amounts discussed below, resulting from the
acquisition of Gear for Sports in the fourth quarter of 2010. As
a percent of net sales our selling, general and administrative
expenses were 23.5% in the six months of 2011 compared to 24.6%
in 2010.
We incurred higher selling and other marketing expenses of
$22 million and higher distribution expenses of
$13 million, partially offset by lower pension expense of
$2 million and lower stock compensation expense of
$2 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010. The
higher selling and other marketing expenses were primarily due
to the incremental costs attributable to Gear for Sports and
higher sales volumes. The higher distribution expenses were
primarily due to higher costs related to higher sales volumes
and incremental costs to implement our price increases.
Our media related MAP expenses and non-media related MAP
expenses were higher by $2 million and $1 million,
respectively, during the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
MAP expenses may vary from period to period during a fiscal year
depending on the timing of our advertising campaigns for retail
selling seasons and product introductions.
We also incurred higher expenses of $3 million in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of opening new
retail stores or expanding existing stores. We opened two retail
stores and expanded three existing retail stores during the six
months of 2011.
Changes due to foreign currency exchange rates, which are
included in the impact of the changes discussed above, resulted
in higher selling, general and administrative expenses of
$4 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
Operating
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
250,311
|
|
|
$
|
208,517
|
|
|
$
|
41,794
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
Operating profit was higher in the six months of 2011 compared
to 2010 as a result of higher gross profit of $80 million,
partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative
expenses of $38 million. Changes in foreign currency
exchange rates had a favorable impact on operating profit of
$3 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
Other
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
4,034
|
|
|
$
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
|
(64.9
|
)%
|
During the six months of 2011, we incurred charges of
$1 million for funding fees associated with the sales of
certain trade accounts receivable to financial institutions.
During the six months of 2010, we wrote off unamortized debt
issuance costs and incurred charges for funding fees associated
with the sales of certain trade accounts receivable to financial
institutions, which
38
combined totaled $4 million. The write-off related to
unamortized debt issuance costs resulted from the repayment of
$57 million of principal under the 2009 Senior Secured
Credit Facility and from the reduction in borrowing capacity
available under the accounts receivable securitization facility
that we entered into in November 2007 (the Accounts
Receivable Securitization Facility) from $250 million
to $150 million that we effected in recognition of our
lower trade accounts receivable balance resulting from the sales
of certain trade accounts receivable to a financial institution
outside the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility.
Interest
Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
80,283
|
|
|
$
|
74,068
|
|
|
$
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Interest expense, net was higher by $6 million in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010. The higher interest expense was
primarily attributable to higher outstanding debt balances that
increased interest expense by $7 million. In addition, the
refinancing of our debt structure in November 2010, which
included the sale of our $1 billion 6.375% Senior
Notes, and the amendment of the 2009 Senior Secured Credit
Facility in February 2011, together with a higher LIBOR,
combined caused a net decrease in interest expense in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010 of $1 million.
Our weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt was
5.67% during the six months of 2011 compared to 5.46% in the six
months of 2010.
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
33,722
|
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
|
$
|
25,232
|
|
|
|
297.2
|
%
|
Our effective income tax rate was 20% in the six months of 2011
compared to 7% in the six months of 2010. The higher effective
income tax rate for the six months of 2011 compared to the six
months of 2010 was primarily attributable to a one-time benefit
of $20 million in the six months of 2010 resulting from the
finalization of tax reviews and audits for amounts that were
less than originally anticipated. This non-recurring income tax
benefit was partially offset by a higher proportion of our
earnings attributed to foreign subsidiaries than in the six
months of 2010 which are taxed at rates lower than the
U.S. statutory rate.
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
134,891
|
|
|
$
|
121,925
|
|
|
$
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Net income for the six months of 2011 was higher than the six
months of 2010 primarily due to higher operating profit of
$42 million and lower other expenses of $3 million,
partially offset by higher income tax expense of
$25 million and higher interest expense of $6 million.
39
Operating
Results by Business Segment Six Months Ended
July 2, 2011 Compared with Six Months Ended July 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
Higher
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
1,056,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,067
|
|
|
$
|
45,947
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
662,084
|
|
|
|
505,179
|
|
|
|
156,905
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
78,570
|
|
|
|
79,831
|
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
180,254
|
|
|
|
178,353
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
International
|
|
|
284,721
|
|
|
|
230,262
|
|
|
|
54,459
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
2,261,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,692
|
|
|
$
|
257,951
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
151,968
|
|
|
$
|
170,647
|
|
|
$
|
(18,679
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
61,423
|
|
|
|
22,685
|
|
|
|
38,738
|
|
|
|
170.8
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
25,673
|
|
|
|
28,001
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Direct to Consumer
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
International
|
|
|
37,775
|
|
|
|
25,714
|
|
|
|
12,061
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit
|
|
|
286,601
|
|
|
|
255,376
|
|
|
|
31,225
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Items not included in segment operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
(29,054
|
)
|
|
|
(40,731
|
)
|
|
|
(11,677
|
)
|
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
Amortization of trademarks and other intangibles
|
|
|
(7,236
|
)
|
|
|
(6,128
|
)
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
|
250,311
|
|
|
|
208,517
|
|
|
|
41,794
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(1,415
|
)
|
|
|
(4,034
|
)
|
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
|
(64.9
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(80,283
|
)
|
|
|
(74,068
|
)
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
$
|
168,613
|
|
|
$
|
130,415
|
|
|
$
|
38,198
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant portion of the selling, general and administrative
expenses in each segment is an allocation of our consolidated
selling, general and administrative expenses, however certain
expenses that are specifically identifiable to a segment are
charged directly to such segment. Certain prior year segment
selling, general and administrative expenses have been revised
to conform to the current year presentation. These changes were
primarily the result of our decision to cease allocating certain
compensation related expenses to the segments. Other than this
change, the allocation methodology for the consolidated selling,
general and administrative expenses for the six months of 2011
was consistent with the six months of 2010. Our consolidated
selling, general and administrative expenses before segment
allocations were $38 million higher in the six months of
2011 compared to 2010.
Innerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,056,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,067
|
|
|
$
|
45,947
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
151,968
|
|
|
|
170,647
|
|
|
|
(18,679
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
Overall net sales in the Innerwear segment were higher by
$46 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010,
primarily due to stronger net sales in our male underwear and
socks product categories, partially offset by lower net sales in
our intimate apparel product category.
40
Net sales in the male underwear product category were 10% or
$45 million higher in the six months of 2011 compared to
2010, primarily due to net price increases, retailer inventory
restocking and space gains in the discount retail and department
store channels.
Higher net sales of $10 million in our socks product
category reflect higher Hanes brand net sales of
$14 million, partially offset by lower Champion
brand net sales of $4 million in the six months of 2011
compared to 2010. The higher Hanes brand net sales were
primarily due to net price increases and stronger sales at
retail and the lower Champion brand net sales were
primarily attributable to the loss of a seasonal program.
Intimate apparel net sales were $9 million lower in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010. Our bra category net sales were
$15 million lower primarily due to retailer inventory
replenishment timing, lower sales at retail, and higher sales of
products with discounted promotional pricing, partially offset
by net price increases. Our panties category net sales were
higher by $6 million primarily due to net price increases
and retailer inventory restocking. From a brand perspective, our
net sales were lower in our Hanes brand by
$11 million and our Playtex brand by
$7 million, partially offset by higher net sales in our
Bali brand of $5 million and our smaller brands
(barely there, Just My Size and Wonderbra)
of $5 million.
Innerwear segment gross profit was lower by $7 million in
the six months of 2011 compared to 2010. The lower gross profit
was primarily due to $39 million of higher input costs such
as cotton costs related to finished goods manufactured
internally in our facilities, vendor prices, wages and energy
and oil-related materials, higher other manufacturing costs of
$13 primarily related to higher volume and freight costs, higher
costs of $6 million primarily related to incremental costs
to service higher demand and higher excess and obsolete
inventory costs of $4 million. Our excess and obsolete
inventory costs were higher primarily in our intimate apparel
categories as a result of specific retailer program
discontinuations. These higher costs were offset by higher net
product pricing of $31 million, which includes the impact
of higher sales incentives of $34 million, efficiency
savings related to our supply chain optimization of
$14 million, higher sales volume of $7 million and
favorable product sales mix of $2 million.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Innerwear
segment was 32.7% in the six months of 2011 compared to 34.9% in
the six months of 2010.
Innerwear segment operating profit was lower in the six months
of 2011 compared to 2010 primarily as a result of lower gross
profit, higher distribution expenses of $8 million related
to higher sales volumes and incremental costs to implement our
price increases partially offset by the elimination of excess
2010 costs related to servicing sales growth and higher media
related MAP expenses of $3 million.
Outerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
662,084
|
|
|
$
|
505,179
|
|
|
$
|
156,905
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
61,423
|
|
|
|
22,685
|
|
|
|
38,738
|
|
|
|
170.8
|
|
Outerwear segment net sales were higher by $157 million or
31% in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010. Outerwears
segment net sales include the impact of Gear for Sports, which
was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2010 and contributed
$107 million or 21 percentage points of the
segments 31% net sales growth and $37 million of
gross profit for the six months of 2011. The Gear for Sports
business includes sales of licensed logo apparel in collegiate
bookstores and other channels.
Our Champion brand activewear net sales were higher by
$24 million or 11% due to stronger sales at retail in the
mass merchant and wholesale club channels and space gains in the
department store and wholesale club channels. Our Champion
brand has achieved continued growth by focusing on the fast
growing active demographic with a unique moderate price
positioning.
Our casualwear category net sales were higher in the wholesale
channel by $37 million and lower in the retail channel by
$11 million. The higher net sales in the wholesale
casualwear channel of 21% were primarily
41
due to net price increases and replenishment timing of inventory
levels by embellishers and wholesalers, partially offset by
lower sales at retail. The lower net sales in the retail
casualwear channel were primarily due to lower sales at retail.
Outerwear segment gross profit was higher by $61 million in
the six months of 2011 compared to 2010. The higher gross profit
was primarily due to higher net product pricing of
$36 million, which includes the impact of higher sales
incentives of $3 million, higher sales volume of
$29 million, favorable product sales mix of
$23 million, efficiency savings related to our supply chain
optimization of $8 million and lower other manufacturing
costs of $2 million. These lower costs were partially
offset by $32 million of higher input costs such as cotton
costs related to finished goods manufactured internally in our
facilities, vendor prices, wages and energy and oil-related
materials and higher excess and obsolete inventory costs of
$3 million.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Outerwear
segment was 26.2% in the six months of 2011 compared to 22.3% in
the six months of 2010.
Outerwear segment operating profit was higher in the six months
of 2011 compared to 2010 primarily as a result of higher gross
profit, partially offset by higher selling and other marketing
expenses of $15 million, higher distribution expenses of
$4 million related to higher sales volumes and incremental
costs to implement our price increases and higher non-media
related MAP expenses of $1 million. The higher selling and
other marketing expenses were primarily due to higher sales
volumes and the incremental costs resulting from the acquisition
of Gear for Sports.
Hosiery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
78,570
|
|
|
$
|
79,831
|
|
|
$
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
25,673
|
|
|
|
28,001
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Net sales in the Hosiery segment declined by $1 million or
2%, which was primarily due to lower net sales of our
Leggs brand to mass retailers and food and drug
stores of $3 million, partially offset by higher net sales
of the DKNY brand in the wholesale club channel. The
hosiery category has been in a state of consistent decline for
the past decade, as the trend toward casual dress reduced demand
for sheer hosiery. Generally, we manage the Hosiery segment for
cash, placing an emphasis on reducing our cost structure and
managing cash efficiently.
Hosiery segment gross profit was lower by $5 million in the
six months of 2011 compared to 2010. The lower gross profit for
the six months of 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily the result
of higher other manufacturing costs of $4 million,
unfavorable product sales mix of $3 million and lower sales
volume of $2 million. These higher costs were partially
offset by lower excess and obsolete inventory costs of
$3 million and lower sales incentives of $2 million.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the Hosiery
segment was 48.9% in the six months of 2011 compared to 54.9% in
the six months of 2010.
Hosiery segment operating profit was lower in the six months of
2011 compared to 2010 primarily as a result of lower gross
profit, partially offset by lower distribution expenses of
$2 million.
Direct
to Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
180,254
|
|
|
$
|
178,353
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
42
Direct to Consumer segment net sales were higher by
$2 million or 1% in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010
due to higher net sales in our outlet stores of $3 million,
partially offset by lower net sales related to our Internet
operations of $1 million. Comparable store sales were 2%
higher in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
Direct to Consumer segment gross profit was $2 million
higher in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due
to higher net product pricing of $3 million, partially
offset by higher input costs of $2 million. As a percent of
segment net sales, gross profit in the Direct to Consumer
segment was 62.6% in the six months of 2011 compared to 62.2% in
the six months of 2010.
Direct to Consumer segment operating profit was higher in the
six months of 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher
gross profit and lower distribution expenses of $1 million,
partially offset by higher expenses of $3 million as a
result of opening new retail stores or expanding existing stores.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
Higher
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
(Lower)
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
284,721
|
|
|
$
|
230,262
|
|
|
$
|
54,459
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
37,775
|
|
|
|
25,714
|
|
|
|
12,061
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
Overall net sales in the International segment were higher by
$54 million or 24% in the six months of 2011 compared to
2010, primarily as a result of sales growth in Asia, Europe,
Latin America and Australia, which reflect net price increases,
space gains, and a favorable impact of $18 million related
to foreign currency exchange rates. Excluding the impact of
foreign exchange rates on currency, International segment net
sales were higher by 16% in the six months of 2011 compared to
2010. The favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates in
our International segment was primarily due to the strengthening
of the Japanese yen, Euro, Canadian dollar, Brazilian real and
Mexican peso compared to the U.S. dollar.
During the six months of 2011, we experienced higher net sales,
in each case excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange
rates, in our activewear and male underwear businesses in Asia
of $17 million, in our casualwear business in Europe of
$10 million, in our hosiery, male underwear and intimate
apparel businesses in Latin America of $7 million and in
our activewear business in Australia of $6 million, which
benefited from the acquisition of the assets of TNF in April
2011. These higher net sales were partially offset by lower net
sales in our intimate apparel business in Canada of
$4 million. Net sales in our businesses in China and India
each grew over 50% in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
The higher net sales in Asia are primarily attributable to space
gains and a one-time termination fee of $5 million related
to a royalty license agreement. We subsequently entered into a
new agreement with the licensee. In certain international
markets we are focusing on adopting global designs for some
product categories to quickly launch new styles to expand our
market position. The higher net sales reflect our successful
efforts to improve our strong positions.
International segment gross profit was higher by
$22 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010. The
higher gross profit was primarily a result of higher net product
pricing of $19 million, a favorable impact related to
foreign currency exchange rates of $7 million, higher sales
volume of $5 million and a one-time termination fee of
$5 million related to a royalty license agreement,
partially offset by vendor price increases of $12 million
and higher excess and obsolete inventory costs of
$2 million.
As a percent of segment net sales, gross profit in the
International segment was 39.7% in the six months of 2011
compared to 39.4% in the six months of 2010.
International segment operating profit was higher in the six
months of 2011 compared to 2010, which was primarily
attributable to the higher gross profit, partially offset by
higher distribution expenses of $4 million and higher
selling and other marketing expenses of $4 million. The
changes in foreign currency
43
exchange rates, which are included in the impact on gross profit
above, had a favorable impact on operating profit of
$3 million in the six months of 2011 compared to 2010.
General
Corporate Expenses
General corporate expenses were lower in the six months of 2011
compared to 2010 primarily due to lower
start-up and
shut-down costs of $3 million associated with the
consolidation and globalization of our supply chain, lower
pension expense of $2 million, lower stock compensation
expense of $2 million and lower accelerated depreciation of
$2 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Trends
and Uncertainties Affecting Liquidity
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated by
operations and availability under the $600 million
revolving credit facility (the Revolving Loan
Facility) under the 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility,
the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility and our
international loan facilities. At July 2, 2011, we had
$577 million of borrowing availability under our Revolving
Loan Facility (after taking into account outstanding letters of
credit), $45 million in cash and cash equivalents,
$69 million of borrowing availability under our
international loan facilities and no borrowing availability
under our Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility. We
currently believe that our existing cash balances and cash
generated by operations, together with our available credit
capacity, will enable us to comply with the terms of our
indebtedness and meet foreseeable liquidity requirements.
The following have impacted or are expected to impact liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
we have principal and interest obligations under our debt;
|
|
|
|
we expect to continue to invest in efforts to improve operating
efficiencies and lower costs;
|
|
|
|
we expect to continue to ramp up and optimize our lower-cost
manufacturing capacity in Asia, Central America and the
Caribbean Basin and enhance efficiency;
|
|
|
|
we may selectively pursue strategic acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
we could increase or decrease the portion of the income of our
foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the
United States, which could significantly impact our effective
income tax rate; and
|
|
|
|
our board of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to
10 million shares of our stock in the open market over the
next few years (2.8 million of which we have repurchased as
of July 2, 2011 at a cost of $75 million), although we
may choose not to repurchase any stock and instead focus on
other uses of cash such as the repayment of our debt.
|
We expect to be able to manage our working capital levels and
capital expenditure amounts to maintain sufficient levels of
liquidity. Factors that could help us in these efforts include
higher sales volume and the realization of additional cost
benefits from previous restructuring and related actions. We
have restructured our supply chain over the past four years to
create more efficient production clusters that utilize fewer,
larger facilities and to balance production capability between
the Western Hemisphere and Asia. In response to sales growth in
2010 and the continued sales growth in 2011, we have secured
additional capacity with outside contractors to support sales
growth.
Cash
Requirements for Our Business
We rely on our cash flows generated from operations and the
borrowing capacity under our Revolving Loan Facility, Accounts
Receivable Securitization Facility and international loan
facilities to meet the cash requirements of our business. The
primary cash requirements of our business are payments to
vendors in the normal course of business, capital expenditures,
maturities of debt and related interest payments, contributions
to our pension plans and repurchases of our stock. We believe we
have sufficient cash and available borrowings for our liquidity
needs.
44
Our working capital was higher in the six months of 2011
compared to the six months of 2010, primarily in the form of
inventory. In 2011 we expect working capital to be higher than
2010 to support the continued double-digit sales growth we
expect to experience, price increases and cost inflation.
Inventory as of the end of the second quarter of 2011 was
$318 million higher than year-end 2010 inventory due to
planned seasonal inventory build and higher input costs such as
cotton and oil-related materials.
As a result of the cost inflation and higher product pricing, we
expect a negative impact on our cash flow from higher working
capital, in particular higher accounts receivable and
inventories, partially offset by improved inventory turns and
higher accounts payable. We typically use cash for the first
half of the year and generate most of our cash flow in the
second half of the year.
Capital spending has varied significantly from year to year as
we executed our supply chain consolidation and globalization
strategy and the integration and consolidation of our technology
systems. We spent $48 million on gross capital expenditures
during the six months of 2011, which were offset by cash
proceeds of $12 million primarily from a sale-leaseback
transaction. We expect to continue to invest in our
infrastructure during 2011 with net capital expenditures
approximating $100 million.
We expect, based on a calculation by our actuary, to make
required cash contributions of $10 million to
$12 million to the U.S. qualified pension plan in
2011. We may elect to make voluntary contributions, which are
not expected to be significant, in 2011.
There have been no other significant changes in the cash
requirements for our business from those described in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011.
Sources
and Uses of Our Cash
The information presented below regarding the sources and uses
of our cash flows for the six months ended July 2, 2011 and
July 3, 2010 was derived from our consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2,
|
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(68,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,272
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(44,694
|
)
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
113,201
|
|
|
|
76,247
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
43,671
|
|
|
|
38,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
44,655
|
|
|
$
|
36,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $68 million in
the six months of 2011 compared to $64 million in the six
months of 2010. The net increase in cash used in operating
activities of $4 million for the six months of 2011
compared to the six months of 2010 is primarily attributable to
higher uses of our working capital of $17 million,
partially offset by higher net income of $13 million.
Net inventory increased $345 million from July 3, 2010
primarily due to $205 million of higher inflationary costs,
$90 million of incremental units to support sales growth
and $50 million related to Gear for Sports. Between
July 2, 2011 and the end of 2011, we expect inventory units
on hand to decrease, however, as a result of high inflationary
costs, our inventory dollars may not peak until the third
quarter of 2011. Net inventory increased $318 million from
January 1, 2011 primarily due to $163 million of
incremental units in order to build for the seasonally stronger
second half of the year and the
back-to-school
period and $155 million of higher inflationary costs.
Inventory units at 2011 year-end are expected to be
slightly lower than 2010 year-end.
45
Accounts receivable was $109 million higher compared to
January 1, 2011 primarily due to higher sales volumes and
higher net product pricing we have implemented in response to
systemic cost inflation, partially offset by the timing of
collections.
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $45 million in
the six months of 2011 compared to $13 million in the six
months of 2010. The net increase in cash used in investing
activities of $32 million for in the six months of 2011
compared to the six months of 2010 was primarily the result of
lower proceeds from sales of assets of $33 million and cash
used for the acquisition of the assets of TNF in April 2011 of
$9 million, partially offset by lower gross capital
expenditures of $10 million. During the six months of 2011,
proceeds from sales of assets were $12 million, primarily
resulting from a sale-leaseback transaction involving one
distribution center.
Financing
Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $113 million
in the six months of 2011 compared to $76 million in the
six months of 2010. The higher net cash from financing
activities of $37 million in the six months of 2011
compared to the six months of 2010 was primarily the result of
higher net borrowings of $91 million on the Accounts
Receivable Securitization Facility and higher net borrowings on
notes payable of $12 million, partially offset by higher
net repayments on the Revolving Loan Facility of
$128 million. In addition, we made $59 million in
repayments of debt under the 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility
in the six months of 2010 that did not recur in the six months
of 2011. We also received higher proceeds from stock options
exercised of $7 million, partially offset by payments of
$4 million in the six months of 2011 to amend our credit
facilities that did not occur in the six months of 2010.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
As of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, cash and cash
equivalents were $45 million and $44 million,
respectively. The higher cash and cash equivalents as of
July 2, 2011 was primarily the result of net cash provided
by financing activities of $113 million, partially offset
by net cash used in operating activities of $68 million and
net cash used in investing activities of $45 million.
Financing
Arrangements
In February 2011, we amended the 2009 Senior Secured Credit
Facility, which includes the Revolving Loan Facility, to reflect
improved debt ratings. This amendment reduced the interest rate,
extended the maturity date by two years to December 10,
2015, and increased the flexibility of debt covenants and the
use of excess cash flow. In addition, the commitment fee for the
unused portion of revolving loan commitments was reduced from
75 basis points to 50 basis points. Further, the
applicable margin pricing grid for the loans, which varies based
on the Companys Leverage Ratio (as defined below), was
reduced by 125 basis points at each applicable Leverage
Ratio level.
Pursuant to this amendment, the ratio of total debt to EBITDA
(the Leverage Ratio) that we may not exceed was
increased from 4.00 to 1 for each fiscal quarter ending between
October 16, 2010 and April 15, 2011 to 4.50 to 1, and
will decline over time to 3.75 to 1. Also, the minimum ratio of
EBITDA to consolidated total interest expense that we are
required to maintain was decreased from 3.25 to 1 for each
fiscal quarter ending between July 16, 2011 and
October 15, 2012 to 3.00 to 1 and will increase over time
to 3.25 to 1. In addition, we will be required to maintain a
maximum ratio of senior secured indebtedness to EBITDA, which
for each fiscal quarter ending between October 16, 2010 and
October 15, 2012 cannot exceed 2.50 to 1, and will decline
over time to 2.00 to 1. The methods of calculating all of the
components used in these ratios are included in the 2009 Senior
Secured Credit Facility. This amendment also significantly
increased the flexibility of the indebtedness, investment and
restricted payments baskets and use of excess cash flow under
the 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility.
46
In January 2011, we amended the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Facility to provide for two of the subsidiaries
acquired by us in the Gear for Sports acquisition, in addition
to Hanesbrands, to sell, on a revolving basis, certain domestic
trade receivables pursuant to this facility. Prior to this
amendment, the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
contained the same financial ratio provisions as those contained
in the 2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility. Pursuant to this
amendment, we are required to maintain the financial ratios and
other financial covenants contained from time to time in the
2009 Senior Secured Credit Facility, provided that any changes
to such covenants after the date of this amendment will only be
applicable for purposes of the Accounts Receivable
Securitization Facility if approved by the managing agents under
the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility or their
affiliates. This amendment also provided for certain other
amendments to the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility,
including extending the termination date to March 31, 2011.
In connection with this amendment, certain fees were due to the
managing agents and certain fees payable to the committed
purchasers and the conduit purchasers were decreased.
We also amended the Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility
in March 2011. In order to take greater advantage of favorable
interest rates, the amount of funding available under the
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, which was initially
$250 million and which we reduced to $150 million
effective February 2010, was increased to $225 million.
This amendment also provided for certain other amendments to the
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility, including extending
the termination date to March 16, 2012. In addition,
certain of the factors that contribute to the overall
availability of funding were modified in a manner that, taken
together, could result in an increase in the amount of funding
that will be available under the facility.
As of July 2, 2011, we were in compliance with all
financial covenants under our credit facilities. We expect to
maintain compliance with our covenants for the foreseeable
future, however economic conditions or the occurrence of events
discussed under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or other SEC filings could cause noncompliance.
There have been no other significant changes in the financing
arrangements from those described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have chosen accounting policies that we believe are
appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating
results and financial condition in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. We apply
these accounting policies in a consistent manner. Our
significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2,
titled Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011.
The application of critical accounting policies requires that we
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are based on
historical and other factors believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an
ongoing basis and may retain outside consultants to assist in
our evaluation. If actual results ultimately differ from
previous estimates, the revisions are included in results of
operations in the period in which the actual amounts become
known. The critical accounting policies that involve the most
significant management judgments and estimates used in
preparation of our financial statements, or are the most
sensitive to change from outside factors, are discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011. There have been no
material changes in these policies during the quarter ended
July 2, 2011.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Fair
Value Measurements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued new accounting rules related to fair
value measurements. The new accounting rules clarify some
existing concepts, eliminate
47
wording differences between accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),
and in some limited cases, change some principles to achieve
convergence between GAAP and IFRS. The new accounting rules
result in a consistent definition of fair value and common
requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value
between GAAP and IFRS. The new accounting rules also expand the
disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using
significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The new
accounting rules will be effective for us beginning after
December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of the new
accounting rules to have a material effect on our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Presentation
of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting rules which require
an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the
components of net income, and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive
statements. The new accounting rules eliminate the option to
present components of other comprehensive income as part of the
statement of equity. The new accounting rules will be effective
for us beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect
the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
There have been no significant changes in our market risk
exposures from those described in Item 7A of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 1, 2011.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b),
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Interim Chief Financial Officer (Chief Financial
Officer), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-15(e),
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(d),
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting occurred during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
48
PART II
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Although we are subject to various claims and legal actions that
occur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business,
we are not party to any pending legal proceedings that we
believe could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
No updates to report.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in April 2011, our
stockholders recommended, by a non-binding advisory vote, that
we have an annual advisory vote regarding executive
compensation. After considering this, as well as the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors that we should have an annual stockholder advisory
vote on executive compensation, our Board of Directors accepted
the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are
filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HANESBRANDS INC.
Dale W. Boyles
Interim Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 28, 2011
50
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Hanesbrands Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 5, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Articles Supplementary (Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, Series A) (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 5, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hanesbrands Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 15, 2008).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Formation of BA International, L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of BA International, L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Caribesock, Inc., together with
Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and
Registered Agent (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.6 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Bylaws of Caribesock, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.7 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Caribetex, Inc., together with
Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and
Registered Agent (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.8 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.9
|
|
Bylaws of Caribetex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.9 to the Registrants Registration Statement
on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.10
|
|
Certificate of Formation of CASA International, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.10 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.11
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of CASA International, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.11 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CC
Products, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.50
to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of CC Products, Inc. (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.51 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.14
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Ceibena Del, Inc., together with
Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and
Registered Agent (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.12 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.15
|
|
Bylaws of Ceibena Del, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.13 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.16
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Event 1, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.52 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.17
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Event 1, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.53 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.18
|
|
Amended Certificate of Incorporation of GearCo, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.44 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.19
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of GearCo, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.45 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.20
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GFSI
Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.46
to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.21
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of GFSI Holdings, Inc. (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.47 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.22
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GFSI, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.48 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.23
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of GFSI, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.49 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-171114)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 10, 2010).
|
|
3
|
.24
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Hanes Menswear, LLC, together with
Certificate of Conversion from a Corporation to a Limited
Liability Company Pursuant to
Section 18-214
of the Limited Liability Company Act and Certificate of Change
of Location of Registered Office and Registered Agent
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.14 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.25
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Hanes Menswear, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.15 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.26
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of HPR, Inc., together with
Certificate of Merger of Hanes Puerto Rico, Inc. into HPR, Inc.
(now known as Hanes Puerto Rico, Inc.) (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.16 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.27
|
|
Bylaws of Hanes Puerto Rico, Inc. (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.17 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
E-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.28
|
|
Articles of Organization of Sara Lee Direct, LLC, together with
Articles of Amendment reflecting the change of the entitys
name to Hanesbrands Direct, LLC (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.18 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.29
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sara Lee Direct, LLC (now
known as Hanesbrands Direct, LLC) (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.19 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.30
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Sara Lee Distribution, Inc.,
together with Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation of Sara Lee Distribution, Inc. reflecting the
change of the entitys name to Hanesbrands Distribution,
Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.20 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.31
|
|
Bylaws of Sara Lee Distribution, Inc. (now known as Hanesbrands
Distribution, Inc.) (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.21 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.32
|
|
Certificate of Formation of HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.22 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.33
|
|
Operating Agreement of HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.23 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.34
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of HBI Branded Apparel Limited,
Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.24 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.35
|
|
Bylaws of HBI Branded Apparel Limited, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.25 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.36
|
|
Certificate of Formation of HbI International, LLC (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.26 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.37
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of HbI International, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.27 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.38
|
|
Certificate of Formation of SL Sourcing, LLC, together with
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Formation of SL
Sourcing, LLC reflecting the change of the entitys name to
HBI Sourcing, LLC (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.28 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.39
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of SL Sourcing, LLC (now
known as HBI Sourcing, LLC) (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.29 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.40
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Inner Self LLC (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.30 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.41
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Inner Self LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.31 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
E-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.42
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Jasper-Costa Rica, L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.32 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.43
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Jasper-Costa Rica, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.33 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.44
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Playtex Dorado, LLC, together with
Certificate of Conversion from a Corporation to a Limited
Liability Company Pursuant to
Section 18-214
of the Limited Liability Company Act (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.36 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.45
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Playtex Dorado, LLC (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.37 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.46
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Playtex Industries, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.38 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.47
|
|
Bylaws of Playtex Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.39 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.48
|
|
Certificate of Formation of Seamless Textiles, LLC, together
with Certificate of Conversion from a Corporation to a Limited
Liability Company Pursuant to
Section 18-214
of the Limited Liability Company Act (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.40 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.49
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement of Seamless Textiles, LLC
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.41 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.50
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of UPCR, Inc., together with
Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and
Registered Agent (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.42 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.51
|
|
Bylaws of UPCR, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.43 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.52
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of UPEL, Inc., together with
Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and
Registered Agent (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.44 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.53
|
|
Bylaws of UPEL, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.45 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
(Commission file number
333-142371)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 26, 2007).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Richard A. Noll, Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Dale W. Boyles, Interim Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Richard A. Noll, Chief
Executive Officer.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Dale W. Boyles, Interim Chief
Financial Officer.
|
E-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
101
|
.INS XBRL
|
|
Instance Document*
|
|
101
|
.SCH XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
|
|
101
|
.CAL XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
|
|
101
|
.LAB XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
|
|
101
|
.PRE XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
|
|
101
|
.DEF XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed
not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for
purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those
sections. |
E-5