e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 01-12846
PROLOGIS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-2604728
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado
(Address or principal executive offices)
|
|
80239
(Zip Code) |
(303) 567-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
14100 East 35th Place, Aurora, Colorado 80011
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants common shares as of May 4, 2006 was
244,975,819.
PROLOGIS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
233,033 |
|
|
$ |
131,203 |
|
CDFS dispositions proceeds |
|
|
305,010 |
|
|
|
282,591 |
|
Property management and other fees and incentives |
|
|
38,568 |
|
|
|
16,527 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
580,779 |
|
|
|
430,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
64,171 |
|
|
|
37,521 |
|
Cost of CDFS dispositions |
|
|
238,286 |
|
|
|
227,250 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
33,788 |
|
|
|
23,934 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
72,554 |
|
|
|
41,470 |
|
Merger integration and relocation expenses |
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
413,697 |
|
|
|
334,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
167,082 |
|
|
|
95,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from unconsolidated property funds |
|
|
56,445 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
Earnings from CDFS joint ventures and other unconsolidated investees |
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(70,853 |
) |
|
|
(36,493 |
) |
Interest income on long-term notes receivable |
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(1,281 |
) |
|
|
(23,077 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before minority interest |
|
|
165,801 |
|
|
|
72,536 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
(1,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before certain net gains (expenses/losses) |
|
|
164,676 |
|
|
|
71,195 |
|
Gains recognized on dispositions of certain non-CDFS business assets, net |
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange expenses/losses, net |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
177,063 |
|
|
|
71,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense |
|
|
13,197 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
13,366 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
163,697 |
|
|
|
69,069 |
|
(Continued)
3
PROLOGIS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale |
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
Losses related to temperature-controlled distribution assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,370 |
) |
Gains (losses) recognized on dispositions, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-CDFS business assets |
|
|
16,428 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
CDFS business assets |
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
25,816 |
|
|
|
(7,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
189,513 |
|
|
|
61,428 |
|
Less preferred share dividends |
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to common shares |
|
|
183,159 |
|
|
|
55,074 |
|
Other comprehensive income items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(4,473 |
) |
|
|
(15,196 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative contracts, net |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
178,266 |
|
|
$ |
40,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
244,282 |
|
|
|
186,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
255,146 |
|
|
|
196,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares Basic |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares Diluted |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per common share |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
PROLOGIS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
12,002,993 |
|
|
$ |
11,875,130 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
1,149,705 |
|
|
|
1,118,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,853,288 |
|
|
|
10,756,583 |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees |
|
|
1,189,097 |
|
|
|
1,049,743 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
254,095 |
|
|
|
191,716 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
301,861 |
|
|
|
327,214 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
808,042 |
|
|
|
788,840 |
|
Discontinued operations assets held for sale |
|
|
258,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,664,619 |
|
|
$ |
13,114,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
7,054,628 |
|
|
$ |
6,677,880 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
328,208 |
|
|
|
332,339 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
600,343 |
|
|
|
557,210 |
|
Discontinued operations assets held for sale |
|
|
46,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
8,029,831 |
|
|
|
7,567,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
53,546 |
|
|
|
58,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Shares at stated liquidation
preference of $50.00 per share; $0.01 par value;
2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Series F Preferred Shares at stated liquidation
preference of $25.00 per share; $0.01 par value;
5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Series G Preferred Shares at stated liquidation
preference of $25.00 per share; $0.01 par value;
5,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Common Shares; $0.01 par value; 244,817,298 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006 and
243,781,142 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
5,618,632 |
|
|
|
5,606,017 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
144,693 |
|
|
|
149,586 |
|
Distributions in excess of net earnings |
|
|
(534,531 |
) |
|
|
(620,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
5,581,242 |
|
|
|
5,488,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
13,664,619 |
|
|
$ |
13,114,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
PROLOGIS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
189,513 |
|
|
$ |
61,428 |
|
Minority interest share in earnings |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-lined rents |
|
|
(8,821 |
) |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
Cost of share-based compensation awards |
|
|
5,199 |
|
|
|
4,773 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
74,829 |
|
|
|
43,782 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs and net premium on debt |
|
|
(1,815 |
) |
|
|
1,179 |
|
Gains recognized on dispositions of non-CDFS business assets, net |
|
|
(30,137 |
) |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
Impairment charge on assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,084 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated investees |
|
|
(59,962 |
) |
|
|
(12,269 |
) |
Distributions from and changes in operating receivables of unconsolidated investees |
|
|
29,084 |
|
|
|
14,488 |
|
Purchases of derivative contracts |
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
Adjustments to foreign currency exchange amounts recognized |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Increase in accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
(61,784 |
) |
|
|
(20,565 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
37,008 |
|
|
|
(4,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
175,212 |
|
|
|
98,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments |
|
|
(870,651 |
) |
|
|
(538,841 |
) |
Purchase of ownership interests in property funds |
|
|
(259,248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements and lease commissions on previously leased space |
|
|
(18,407 |
) |
|
|
(12,495 |
) |
Recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
|
|
(2,706 |
) |
Proceeds from dispositions of real estate assets |
|
|
540,936 |
|
|
|
255,871 |
|
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable related to dispositions of assets |
|
|
36,855 |
|
|
|
59,991 |
|
Net investments in unconsolidated investees |
|
|
(102,188 |
) |
|
|
(16,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(677,163 |
) |
|
|
(254,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales and issuances of common shares under various common share plans |
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
|
12,403 |
|
Distributions paid on common shares |
|
|
(97,672 |
) |
|
|
(68,894 |
) |
Minority interest redemptions and distributions |
|
|
(6,231 |
) |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred shares |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
Debt and equity issuance costs paid |
|
|
(5,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (payments on) proceeds from lines of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
|
(148,589 |
) |
|
|
351,893 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes ` |
|
|
844,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on senior notes, secured debt and assessment bonds |
|
|
(29,108 |
) |
|
|
(20,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
564,330 |
|
|
|
266,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
62,379 |
|
|
|
110,911 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
191,716 |
|
|
|
236,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
254,095 |
|
|
$ |
347,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 12 for information on non-cash investing and financing activities and other
information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General:
Business. ProLogis, collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries (we, our, us, the Company
or Prologis), is a publicly held real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates and
develops (directly and through our unconsolidated investees) primarily industrial distribution
properties in North America, Europe and Asia. Our business consists of three reportable business
segments: (i) property operations, (ii) fund management and (iii) corporate distribution facilities
services and other real estate development business (CDFS business). Our property operations
segment represents the direct long-term ownership, and the management and leasing of industrial
distribution and retail properties, both directly and indirectly owned. Our fund management segment
represents the long-term investment management of unconsolidated property funds and the properties
they own. Our CDFS business segment primarily encompasses our development or acquisition of real
estate properties that are generally contributed to an unconsolidated property fund, in which we
have an ownership interest and act as manager, or sold to third parties. See Note 11 for further
discussion of our business segments.
Basis of Presentation. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements, presented in the U.S. dollar, are prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. Our actual results could differ from those
estimates and assumptions. All material intercompany transactions with consolidated
entities have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited interim financial information has been prepared according to the
rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations.
Our management believes that the disclosures presented in these financial statements are adequate
to make the information presented not misleading. In our opinion, all adjustments and eliminations,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position
as of March 31, 2006 and our results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005 have been included. The results of operations for such interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The accompanying unaudited interim
financial information should be read in conjunction with our December 31, 2005 audited Consolidated
Financial Statements, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K.
Certain amounts included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for 2005 have
been reclassified to conform to the 2006 financial statement presentation. These amounts include
reclassifications in the consolidated statement of cash flows resulting in an increase to operating
cash flows of $13.2 million, a decrease to investing cash flows of $14.2 million and an increase to
financing activities of $1.0 million, which we believe are immaterial to 2005.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a
consensus in June 2005 regarding EITF Issue 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the
General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity when the Limited
Partners Have Certain Rights. The EITF agreed on a framework for evaluating when a general partner
controls a limited partnership and whether the partnership should be consolidated. The Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) ratified the consensus that was effective June 29, 2005 for
all new or modified partnerships and effective January 1, 2006 for all existing partnerships. We
adopted EITF 04-5 on January 1, 2006. As such, we performed an evaluation of each of our
unconsolidated investees. We first determined whether or not the entity needed to be evaluated
under EITF 04-5 based on the ownership and legal structure. Next, we evaluated whether the limited
partners had substantive kick-out rights or participating rights, both as defined under EITF 04-5.
We concluded that the unconsolidated investees that were subject to EITF 04-5 and needed to be
evaluated should be accounted for under the equity method of accounting based on the rights
provided to the limited partners under the governing documents of the respective entity.
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R
Share Based Payment (SFAS 123R) that required companies to measure the cost of employee
services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the awards fair value
on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period during which an employee is required to
provide service in exchange for the award, generally the vesting period. We
7
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
adopted SFAS 123R on
January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application. Prior to that date, we recognized the
costs of our share-based compensation plans under SFAS No. 123 Accounting and Disclosure of Stock
Based Compensation that allowed us to continue to account for these plans under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). The impact of adoption of SFAS 123R
is the inclusion of compensation expense within our statements of earnings, which were previously
disclosed as pro forma amounts within the notes to our financial statements. See Note 4.
2. Mergers and Acquisitions:
On September 15, 2005, Catellus Development Corporation, a publicly traded REIT, (Catellus)
merged with and into Palmtree Acquisition Corporation, one of our subsidiaries, pursuant to an
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 6, 2005 (the Merger Agreement), as amended (the
Catellus Merger). At the time of the Catellus Merger, Catellus owned or held an ownership
interest in 41.8 million square feet of industrial, office and retail properties of which
approximately 92% was industrial space.
In connection with the Catellus Merger, we incurred merger integration costs, such as employee
transition costs and severance costs for certain of our employees whose responsibilities became
redundant after the Catellus Merger. We expect to incur integration costs through the first half of
2006, although the majority of these costs have already been incurred.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Catellus stockholders had the opportunity to elect to
receive cash or our common shares for their Catellus stock. As a result of the Catellus Merger, we
issued approximately 55.9 million of our common shares to former Catellus stockholders. We financed
the cash portion of the Catellus Merger primarily through borrowings of $1.5 billion on a
short-term bridge facility (the Bridge Facility). As of March 31, 2006, the Bridge Facility had
been repaid with proceeds from the issuance of senior notes, $900 million issued in November 2005
and $850 million issued in March 2006, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and the
disposition of certain real estate properties. See Note 9 for details of our March 2006 debt
issuance.
The allocation of the purchase price of $5.3 billion was based upon estimates and assumptions.
We engaged a third party business valuation expert to assist primarily with the fair value
assessment of real estate. The current allocations are substantially complete; however, there are
certain items that may be subject to revision if additional information becomes available. We do
not expect future revisions to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the three months ended March 31,
2005, gives effect to the Catellus Merger as if it had occurred on January 1, 2005. The pro forma
results (in millions, except per share amounts) are based on historical data and are not intended
to be indicative of the results of future operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
543.1 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
Net earnings attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
241.8 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
251.8 |
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
8
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
3. Unconsolidated Investees:
Summary of Investments and Income
Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees, which are accounted for under the
equity method, are summarized by type of investee as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Property funds |
|
$ |
826,206 |
|
|
$ |
755,320 |
|
CDFS joint ventures and other investees |
|
|
362,891 |
|
|
|
294,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,189,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,049,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recognize earnings or losses from our investments in unconsolidated investees consisting of
our proportionate share of the net earnings or losses of these investees and interest income on
advances made to these investees, if any. In addition, we earn fees for providing services to the
property funds, CDFS joint ventures and certain other investees. The amounts we have recognized
from our investments in unconsolidated investees are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated investees (including interest income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
42,482 |
|
|
$ |
5,408 |
|
Europe |
|
|
11,199 |
|
|
|
4,721 |
|
Asia |
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property funds |
|
|
56,445 |
|
|
|
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDFS joint ventures and other investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Europe |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
Asia |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS joint ventures and other investees |
|
|
3,517 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity in earnings |
|
$ |
59,962 |
|
|
$ |
12,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management and other fees and incentives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
28,629 |
|
|
$ |
8,094 |
|
Europe |
|
|
7,399 |
|
|
|
7,393 |
|
Asia |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property management and other fees and incentives |
|
$ |
38,568 |
|
|
$ |
16,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Funds
Contributions of developed properties to a property fund allow us to realize, for financial
reporting purposes, a portion of the profits from our development activities while at the same time
allowing us to maintain a long-term ownership interest in our developed properties. This business
strategy also provides liquidity to fund our future development activities and generates fee
income. The property funds generally own operating properties that we have contributed to them,
although certain of the property funds have also acquired properties from third parties. We may
receive additional ownership interests in the property funds as part of the proceeds generated by
the contributions of properties to the property funds. We recognize our proportionate share of the
earnings or losses of each property fund. We earn fees for acting as the manager of each of the
property funds and the fund properties, and we may earn additional fees by providing other services
including, but not limited to, acquisition, development and leasing activities. We may also earn
incentive performance participation based on the investors returns.
On January 4, 2006, we purchased the 80% ownership interests in each of ProLogis North
American Properties Funds II, III and IV (collectively Funds II-IV) from our fund partner. On
March 1, 2006, we contributed substantially all of these assets and associated liabilities to the
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund (the North American Industrial Fund), which was formed in
February 2006 (see below). In connection with these transactions, we recognized the
9
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
following
amounts in the respective financial statement line items for the three months ended March 31, 2006,
after deferral of $17.9 million due to our 20% ownership interest in the North American Industrial
Fund (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
CDFS disposition proceeds (1) |
|
$ |
12,492 |
Property management and other fees and incentives (2) |
|
$ |
21,958 |
Earnings from unconsolidated property funds (3) |
|
$ |
37,113 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the recognition of proceeds that we had previously deferred as part of CDFS income
upon the initial contributions of the properties to Funds II-IV. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents an incentive return we earned due to certain return levels achieved by our fund
partner upon the termination of Funds II-IV. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents our proportionate share of the gain on termination recognized by Funds II-IV. |
Information about our property funds is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
Ownership percentage |
|
and advances to |
|
|
March
31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March
31, |
| |
December 31, |
Property Fund |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
| |
2005 |
ProLogis California (1) |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
114,549 |
|
|
$ |
115,743 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I (1) |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
33,159 |
|
|
|
33,241 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund II-IV (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,410 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V (3) |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
56,190 |
|
|
|
53,104 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
41,070 |
|
|
|
42,227 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
32,275 |
|
|
|
32,543 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
15,463 |
|
|
|
15,602 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
14,191 |
|
|
|
14,274 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
15,950 |
|
|
|
15,968 |
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
32,188 |
|
|
|
33,094 |
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund (4) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,139 |
|
|
|
|
ProLogis European Properties Fund (5) |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
287,456 |
|
|
|
283,435 |
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund I (1) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
94,447 |
|
|
|
103,679 |
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund II (1)(6) |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
826,206 |
|
|
$ |
755,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We have one fund partner in each of these property funds. |
|
(2) |
|
As discussed earlier, on January 4, 2006, we purchased the 80% ownership interests of our
fund partner in each of these property funds and subsequently contributed substantially all of
the assets and associated liabilities into the ProLogis North American Industrial Fund. |
|
(3) |
|
We refer to the combined entities in which we have ownership interests as one property fund
named ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. Our ownership percentage is based on our
levels of ownership interest in these different entities. We are committed to offer to
contribute certain existing industrial distribution properties in the United States and Mexico
to ProLogis North American Properties Fund V, prior to offering for contribution or sale to
any third party, subject to certain conditions, through December 31, 2006. During the three
months ended March 31, 2006, we contributed certain assets for approximately $95 million to
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. We estimate our remaining commitment under this
arrangement to be $255.0 million at March 31, 2006. On January 9, 2006, a preferred unit
holder in a subsidiary of ProLogis North American Properties Fund V exercised its option to
put its interest to us for $55.0 million, which we acquired and include in other investees
below. We have an agreement with ProLogis North American Properties Fund V that would enable
us to put this interest to ProLogis North American Properties Fund V at the same price after
June 30, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
In February 2006, we formed the North American Industrial Fund, with several institutional
investors, which will primarily own recently developed industrial distribution properties in
major distribution markets throughout the United States and Canada. We refer to the combined
entities in which we have ownership interests as one property fund named ProLogis North
American Industrial Fund. We are committed to offer to contribute substantially all of our
stabilized industrial development properties in Canada and the United States to the North
American Industrial Fund. The North American Industrial Fund has equity commitments, which
expire in February 2009, aggregating approximately $1.5 billion from third party investors, of
which $1.2 billion was unfunded at March 31, 2006. We |
10
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
have a 20% ownership interest in the
North American Industrial Fund. We receive property and asset management fees and will also
have the potential for incentive performance participation based on the investors returns. |
|
(5) |
|
We and 21 third parties, primarily institutional investors, own units in the ProLogis
European Properties Fund. ProLogis European Properties Fund has equity commitments from nine
investors through subscription agreements
aggregating 636.6 million (the currency equivalent of approximately $767.4 million at March 31,
2006) of which 140.8 million (the currency equivalent of approximately $169.7 million at March
31, 2006) was unfunded at March 31, 2006. The subscription agreements expire on August 29, 2006.
We are committed to offer to contribute all of the properties that we develop and stabilize in
specified markets in Europe to ProLogis European Properties Fund as long as the fund has capital
to invest, subject to the property meeting certain leasing and other criteria. |
|
(6) |
|
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund II was formed on September 1, 2005. We are committed to offer
to contribute all of the properties that we develop and stabilize in Japan through August 2008
to this property fund, subject to the property meeting certain leasing and other criteria.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we made our first contribution of a property to
this property fund and the property fund acquired four properties from third parties. ProLogis
Japan Properties Fund II has equity commitments aggregating $600.0 million from our fund
partner, which expire in August 2008, of which $523.4 million was unfunded at March 31, 2006. |
Summarized financial information of the property funds (for the entire entity, not our
proportionate share) and our investment in such funds is presented below (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
$ |
97.7 |
|
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
$ |
233.6 |
|
Net earnings (1) |
|
$ |
204.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.7 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
266.5 |
|
As of March 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,129.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,233.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,553.4 |
|
|
$ |
10,916.2 |
|
Amounts due to ProLogis |
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
$ |
83.5 |
|
Third party debt (2) |
|
$ |
2,774.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,082.9 |
|
|
$ |
634.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,491.6 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,051.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,490.6 |
|
|
$ |
832.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,374.6 |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
2,077.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,737.8 |
|
|
$ |
720.6 |
|
|
$ |
4,535.7 |
|
Our weighted average ownership (3) |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
Our investment balance (4) |
|
$ |
424.1 |
|
|
$ |
287.5 |
|
|
$ |
114.6 |
|
|
$ |
826.2 |
|
Deferred proceeds, net of amortization |
|
$ |
81.8 |
|
|
$ |
119.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
247.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Asia |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
126.1 |
|
|
$ |
91.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
232.0 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
26.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
53.4 |
|
As of December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,786.6 |
|
|
$ |
4,052.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,230.1 |
|
|
$ |
10,068.7 |
|
Amounts due to ProLogis |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
96.0 |
|
Third party debt (2) |
|
$ |
2,690.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,991.2 |
|
|
$ |
535.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,217.0 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,921.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,409.6 |
|
|
$ |
639.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,970.4 |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
1,864.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,637.9 |
|
|
$ |
590.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,092.3 |
|
Our weighted average ownership (3) |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Our investment balance (4) |
|
$ |
368.2 |
|
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
103.7 |
|
|
$ |
755.3 |
|
Deferred proceeds, net of amortization |
|
$ |
77.7 |
|
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.1 |
|
|
$ |
227.3 |
|
11
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in net earnings for North America is $185.7 million representing the net gain
recognized by the Funds II-IV termination. |
|
(2) |
|
Of the total third party debt of the property funds, we had guaranteed $42.0 million and
$12.5 million of debt at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, all of which
relate to borrowings ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has outstanding, which mature
in September 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the weighted average of our ownership interests in all property funds based on
each entitys contribution to total assets, before depreciation, net of other liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
The difference between our percentage ownership interest of the property funds equity and
our investment balance results from three types of transactions: (i) deferring a portion of
the proceeds we receive from a contribution of one of our properties to a property fund as a
result of our continued ownership in the property; (ii) recording additional costs associated
with our investment in the property fund; and (iii) advances to the property funds. |
CDFS joint ventures and other investees
At March 31, 2006, we had investments in entities that perform some of our CDFS business
activities (the CDFS joint ventures) and certain other investments. These joint ventures include entities that develop
and own industrial operating properties and also include entities that perform land, multi-use and
residential development activity. The other operating joint ventures include entities that own a
hotel property and office properties. Our investments in and advances to these entities were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
CDFS joint ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
119,850 |
|
|
$ |
113,008 |
|
Europe |
|
|
13,042 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
China |
|
|
62,322 |
|
|
|
57,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS joint ventures |
|
$ |
195,214 |
|
|
$ |
182,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating joint ventures |
|
$ |
85,331 |
|
|
$ |
84,731 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
82,346 |
|
|
|
27,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investees |
|
|
167,677 |
|
|
$ |
112,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
362,891 |
|
|
$ |
294,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On January 9, 2006, a preferred unit holder in a subsidiary of ProLogis North American
Properties Fund V exercised its option to put its interest to us for $55.0 million, which we
acquired. We have an agreement with ProLogis North American Properties Fund V that would
enable us to put this interest to ProLogis North American Properties Fund V at the same price
after June 30, 2006. |
4. Long-Term Compensation:
Share Options
We have granted various share options to our employees and trustees with graded vesting at
various rates over periods from one to 10 years, subject to certain conditions. Each share option
is exercisable into one common share. The holders of share options granted before 2001 earn
dividend equivalent units (DEUs) each year until the earlier of the date the underlying share
option is exercised or the expiration date of the underlying share option. Share options granted
generally vest over a four-year period.
12
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
Share options outstanding at March 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Expiration |
|
Life |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price(1) |
|
Date |
|
(in years) |
Outside Trustees Plan |
|
|
121,250 |
|
|
$19.75 - $43.80 |
|
2009-2015 |
|
|
6.4 |
|
Share options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 grants |
|
|
157,464 |
|
|
$21.22 |
|
2007 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
1998 grants |
|
|
678,895 |
|
|
$20.94 - $21.09 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
1999 grants |
|
|
666,038 |
|
|
$17.19 - $18.62 |
|
2009 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
2000 grants |
|
|
660,242 |
|
|
$21.75 - $24.25 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
2001 grants |
|
|
603,575 |
|
|
$20.67 - $22.02 |
|
2011 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
2002 grants |
|
|
1,091,164 |
|
|
$22.98 - $24.75 |
|
2007, 2012 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
2003 grants |
|
|
1,351,345 |
|
|
$24.90 - $31.26 |
|
2013 |
|
|
7.5 |
|
2004 grants |
|
|
1,792,863 |
|
|
$29.41 - $41.50 |
|
2014 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
2005 grants |
|
|
1,110,093 |
|
|
$40.86 - $45.46 |
|
2015 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
2006 grants |
|
|
7,518 |
|
|
$54.51 |
|
2016 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,240,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The exercise price is equal to the average of the high and low market prices on the date of
grant for each issuance. |
The weighted average fair value of the share options granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2006 was $9.61 per option. There were no options granted during the corresponding period
in 2005. We calculated the fair value of the options granted in 2006 using a Black-Scholes model
with the following assumptions: i) risk free interest rate of 4.69%; ii) dividend yield of 3.59%;
iii) volatility of 20.25%; and iv) weighted-average option life of 5.8 years.
Restricted Share Units
Restricted share units (RSUs), in the form of common shares, are granted at a rate of one
common share per RSU from time to time to our employees and our trustees. The RSUs are valued on
the grant date based upon the market price of a common share on that date. We recognize the value
of the RSUs granted as compensation expense over the applicable vesting period which generally is
four or five years. The RSUs do not carry voting rights during the vesting period, but do generally
earn DEUs that vest according to the underlying RSU.
Performance Shares
Certain employees are granted performance share awards (PSAs). The grants are based on
performance criteria, established in advance, for each employee eligible for the grant. If, based
on the performance criteria, a PSA is earned, the recipient must continue to be employed by us
until the end of the vesting period before any portion of the grant is vested. The PSAs carry no
voting rights during this vesting period, but do earn DEUs that are vested at the end of the
vesting period, which is generally two or three years. The PSAs are valued on the grant date, based
upon the market price of a common share on that date. We recognize the value of the PSAs granted as
compensation expense over the vesting period.
Included in the PSAs outstanding at March 31, 2006 were certain PSAs that will be earned based
on our ranking in a defined subset of companies in the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts (NAREITs) published index. These PSAs will vest over a three-year period. The
amount of PSAs to be issued will be based on our ranking at the end of the three-year period, and
may range from zero to 255,000 shares. For purposes of calculating
compensation expense, we consider the PSAs to have a market condition
and therefore we estimate the amount of PSAs to be earned.
Dividend Equivalent Units
DEUs in the form of common shares are earned at a rate of one common share per DEU for certain
share options granted through 2001, RSUs and PSAs. The DEUs are valued on the grant date, generally
December 31st, based on the market price of a common share on that date. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, we recognized the value of the DEUs issued as compensation expense over the vesting
period of the underlying share award. With the adoption of SFAS
13
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
123R, we
now treat the DEUs as dividends, which are charged to retained
earnings and factored into the
computation of the fair value of the underlying share award at grant date.
Summary of Activity
The activity for the three months ended March 31, 2006, with respect to our share options is
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
8,873,820 |
|
|
$ |
29.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
7,518 |
|
|
$ |
54.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(579,203 |
) |
|
$ |
25.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(61,688 |
) |
|
$ |
35.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
8,240,447 |
|
|
$ |
29.42 |
|
|
|
4,427,383 |
|
|
$ |
24.09 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity with respect to our RSUs and PSAs is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Original |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Vested |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,792,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(277,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,511,344 |
|
|
$ |
37.36 |
|
|
|
367,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recognized $5.2 million of compensation
expense, net of $0.7 million that was capitalized due to our development activities, under the
provisions of SFAS 123R. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, under the provisions of APB
25, we recognized $4.8 million of compensation expense, net of $0.9 million that was capitalized
due to our development activities. With the adoption of SFAS 123R, we now recognize the
compensation cost associated with stock options that was previously disclosed in our footnotes and
we no longer recognize compensation cost associated with dividend equivalent units, which are now
treated as dividends, which are charged to retained earnings and factored into the computation of the fair
value of the underlying share award at grant date. Had we not adopted SFAS 123R, our net earnings
attributable to common shares would have been approximately $182.5 million and our net earnings per share
attributable to common shares would not have changed.
Had we adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2005, our net earnings attributable to common shares
would have changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
Net earnings attributable to common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,074 |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,765 |
|
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported Basic |
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
As reported Diluted |
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
Pro forma Basic |
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
Pro forma Diluted |
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
Total compensation cost related to unvested share options, RSUs and PSAs was $52.4 million as
of March 31, 2006 and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years, prior to
adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development activities and forfeited awards.
14
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
5. Discontinued Operations:
Discontinued operations represent a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or
is classified as held for sale if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or
will be eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction
and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
component after the disposal transaction. The results of operations of the component of the
property or a business are also reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. A
property is classified as held for sale when certain criteria are met. At such time, the respective
assets and liabilities are presented separately on our balance sheet and depreciation is no longer
recognized. Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their
estimated fair value less the costs to sell.
Properties disposed of to third parties are considered discontinued operations unless such
properties were developed under a pre-sale agreement. Properties contributed to property funds in
which we maintain an ownership interest and act as manager are not considered discontinued
operations due to our continuing involvement with the properties. Discontinued operations
recognized directly by our unconsolidated investees, if any, are not reflected separately from our
investment balance or separately from the net earnings or losses of those equity investees.
Income attributable to discontinued operations is summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Disposed Of
The following information relates to properties disposed of to third parties that are recorded
as discontinued operations (in millions, except number of
properties):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Non-CDFS business assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of properties |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net proceeds from dispositions |
|
$ |
137.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
Net gains from dispositions |
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
CDFS business assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of properties |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net proceeds from dispositions |
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
Net gains (losses) from dispositions |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
Our temperature-controlled distribution assets in France were sold in July 2005. In connection
with the sale, we received total proceeds of 30.8 million including a note receivable of
23.9 million that was paid in full in January 2006. We recognized impairment charges of $13.1
million in the first quarter of 2005, to reflect our investment in this business at its estimated
fair value less costs to sell. These charges are included in Losses related to
temperature-controlled distribution assets in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Assets Held For Sale
As of March 31, 2006, we had 19 office properties and one hotel property that were classified
as held for sale and accordingly, the operations of these properties were included in discontinued
operations and the respective assets and liabilities are presented separately in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
15
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
6. Distributions and Dividends:
Common Share Distributions
Cash distributions of $0.40 per common share for the first quarter of 2006 were paid on
February 28, 2006 to holders of common shares on February 15, 2006. Quarterly common share
distributions paid in 2006 are based on the annual distribution level for 2006 of $1.60 per common
share (as compared to $1.48 per common share in 2005) set by the Board of Trustees (Board) in
December 2005. The payment of common share distributions is subject to the discretion of the Board
and is dependent upon our financial condition and operating results, and may be adjusted at the
discretion of the Board during the year.
Preferred Share Dividends
The annual dividends on our cumulative redeemable preferred shares are $4.27 per share (Series
C) and $1.6875 per share (Series F and Series G). On March 31, 2006, we paid quarterly dividends of
$1.0675 per share (Series C) and $0.4219 per share (Series F and Series G). Such dividends are
payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December. Dividends on
preferred shares are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds
legally available for the payment of dividends.
7. Earnings Per Common Share:
We determine basic earnings per share based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. We determine diluted earnings per share based on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average common
shares that would have been outstanding assuming all potentially dilutive instruments were
converted into common shares at the earliest date possible. The following table sets forth the
computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net earnings attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
183,159 |
|
|
$ |
55,074 |
|
Minority interest share in earnings |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
184,284 |
|
|
$ |
56,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
244,282 |
|
|
|
186,154 |
|
Incremental weighted average effect of conversion of limited partnership units |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
Incremental weighted average effect of potentially dilutive instruments (1) |
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
4,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted |
|
|
255,146 |
|
|
|
196,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares Basic |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share attributable to common shares Diluted |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total weighted average potentially dilutive instruments outstanding were 11,116 and 11,180
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Substantially all were
dilutive for both the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. |
16
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
8. Real Estate:
Real estate assets owned directly by us primarily consist of income producing properties,
properties under development and land held for future development. Our real estate assets,
presented at cost, include the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Industrial operating properties (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved land |
|
$ |
1,878,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,774,923 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
7,140,425 |
|
|
|
6,955,983 |
|
Retail operating properties (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improved land |
|
|
67,357 |
|
|
|
66,848 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
215,540 |
|
|
|
221,405 |
|
Land subject to ground leases and other (3) |
|
|
452,399 |
|
|
|
792,668 |
|
Properties under development, including cost of land (4) |
|
|
1,041,465 |
|
|
|
884,345 |
|
Land held for development (5) |
|
|
1,022,971 |
|
|
|
1,045,042 |
|
Other investments (6) |
|
|
183,969 |
|
|
|
133,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate assets |
|
|
12,002,993 |
|
|
|
11,875,130 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
1,149,705 |
|
|
|
1,118,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate assets |
|
$ |
10,853,288 |
|
|
$ |
10,756,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had 1,409 and 1,432 industrial operating
properties consisting of 187.4 million square feet and 185.6 million square feet,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had 27 and 29 retail operating properties, both
consisting of 1.1 million square feet. |
|
(3) |
|
At March 31, 2006, our office properties and one hotel property were classified as assets
held for sale. See Note 5. |
|
(4) |
|
Properties under development consisted of 96 properties aggregating 27.7 million square feet
at March 31, 2006 and 72 properties aggregating 23.2 million square feet at December 31, 2005.
Our total expected investment upon completion of these properties is approximately $2.2
billion at March 31, 2006. |
|
(5) |
|
Land held for future development consisted of 5,870 and 6,568 acres at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
Other investments primarily include: (i) restricted funds that are held in escrow pending the
completion of tax-deferred exchange transactions involving operating properties; (ii) earnest
money deposits associated with potential acquisitions; (iii) costs incurred during the
pre-acquisition due diligence process; (iv) costs incurred during the pre-construction phase
related to future development projects; and (v) costs related to our corporate office
buildings. |
We directly own real estate assets in North America (Canada, Mexico and the United States),
Europe (Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland,
Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) and Asia (China, Japan, Korea and Singapore).
For our direct-owned properties, the largest customer and the 25 largest customers accounted
for 2.3% and 18.5%, respectively, of our annualized collected base rents at March 31, 2006.
17
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
9. Debt:
Our debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Unsecured lines of credit and short-term borrowings |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
$ |
1,835,643 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
$ |
2,240,054 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
3,589,137 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
2,759,675 |
|
Secured debt |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
1,595,431 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
1,643,586 |
|
Assessment bonds |
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
34,417 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
34,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
$ |
7,054,628 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
$ |
6,677,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, we issued $450.0 million of 5.5% senior notes due April 1, 2012 and $400.0
million of 5.75% senior notes due April 1, 2016. We received net proceeds of $838.7 million, after
all offering costs, of which $390.0 million was used to repay the balance under the Bridge Facility
with the remainder to repay borrowings under our global senior credit facility (Global Line).
Our Global Line is a $2.6 billion global senior credit facility from which funds may be drawn
in U.S. dollar, euro, Japanese yen, British pound sterling, Chinese renminbi, South Korean won and
Canadian dollar. The commitments for $40 million of borrowings in Chinese renminbi have been
received but the facilities are not yet available pending the completion of certain conditions that
are expected to be resolved this year. The weighted average interest rate represents the weighted
average base interest rates using local currency rates on borrowings outstanding at the end of the
period.
10. Shareholders Equity:
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we sold and/or issued common shares under
various common share plans, including share-based compensation plans, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
1999 Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan |
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
967 |
|
Continuous Equity Offering Plan (1) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
$ |
7,018 |
|
Long-term Incentive Plan and Share Option Plan for Outside Trustees |
|
|
845 |
|
|
$ |
14,579 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Proceeds were received in April 2006. |
11. Business Segments:
We have three reportable business segments:
|
|
|
Property operations representing the direct long-term ownership, management
and leasing of industrial distribution and retail properties, both directly and indirectly
owned. Each operating property is considered to be an individual operating segment having
similar economic characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon
geographic location. Included in this segment are properties we developed and properties we
acquired and rehabilitated or repositioned within the CDFS business segment with the
intention of contributing the property to a property fund or selling to a third party. Our
operations in the property operations business segment are in North America (Mexico and the
United States), Europe (properties are located in the Czech Republic, France, Germany,
Hungary, Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom and are generally pending contribution to a
property fund or sale to a third party) and Asia (properties are located in China, Japan and
Singapore and are generally pending contribution to a property fund or sale to a third
party). |
|
|
|
|
Fund management representing the long-term investment management of
unconsolidated property funds and the properties they own, generate a high level of returns
to us and our fund partners. Along with the income recognized under the equity method from
our investments in the property funds, we include fees and incentives earned for services
performed on behalf of the property funds and interest earned on advances to the property |
18
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
funds, if any. We utilize our leasing and property management expertise in our property
operations segment for managing the properties owned by property funds in this segment, and we report the costs as
part of rental expenses in the property operations segment. Each investment in a property
fund is considered to be an individual operating segment having similar economic
characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic
location. Our operations in the fund management segment are in North America (Mexico and the
United States), Europe (Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the
Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom), and Asia (Japan). |
|
|
|
|
CDFS business primarily encompasses our development of properties that
generally are either contributed to an unconsolidated property fund, in which we have an
ownership interest and act as manager, or sold to third parties. Additionally, we acquire
properties with the intent to rehabilitate and/or reposition the property in the CDFS
business segment prior to being contributed to a property fund. We engage in commercial
mixed-use development activities generally with the intention of selling the land or
completed projects to third parties. We also have investments in several unconsolidated
entities that perform development activities and we include our proportionate share of their
earnings or losses in this segment. Additionally, we include fees earned for development
activities on behalf of customers or third parties, interest income earned on notes
receivable related to asset sales and gains or losses on the disposition of land parcels
when our development plans no longer include the parcels. The separate activities in this
segment are considered to be individual operating segments having similar economic
characteristics that are combined within the reportable segment based upon geographic
location. Our CDFS business segment operations are in North America (Canada, Mexico and the
United States), in Europe (Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the
Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and in Asia (China, Japan and
Korea). |
We have other operating segments that do not meet the threshold criteria to disclose as a
reportable segment, primarily the management of land subject to ground leases. Each operating
property and activity is located in the United States and is considered to be an individual
operating segment.
The assets of the CDFS business segment generally include properties under development and
land held for development. During the period between the completion of development, rehabilitation
or repositioning of a property and the date the property is contributed to a property fund or sold
to a third party, the property and its associated rental income and rental expenses are included in
the property operations segment because the primary activity associated with the property during
that period is leasing. Upon contribution or sale, the resulting gain or loss is included in the
income of the CDFS business segment.
We present the operations and net gains and losses associated with properties sold to third
parties generally as discontinued operations. In addition, as of March 31, 2006, we had 19 office
properties and one hotel property classified as assets held for sale, with the operations included
in discontinued operations. Accordingly, these amounts are excluded from the segment presentation.
See Note 5.
Reconciliations are presented below for: (i) each reportable business segments revenue from
external customers to our total revenues; (ii) each reportable business segments net operating
income from external customers to our earnings before minority interest; and (iii) each reportable
business segments assets to our total assets. Our chief operating decision makers rely primarily
on net operating income and similar measures to make decisions about allocating resources and
assessing segment performance. The applicable components of our revenues, earnings before minority
interest and assets, excluding discontinued operations, are allocated to each reportable business
segments income, net operating income and assets. Items that are not directly assignable to a
segment, such as certain corporate income and expenses, are reflected as reconciling items. The
following reconciliations are presented in thousands:
19
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operations (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
207,373 |
|
|
$ |
127,876 |
|
Europe |
|
|
11,662 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
Asia |
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operations segment |
|
|
221,625 |
|
|
|
131,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund management (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
71,111 |
|
|
|
13,502 |
|
Europe |
|
|
18,598 |
|
|
|
12,114 |
|
Asia |
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fund management segment |
|
|
95,013 |
|
|
|
28,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDFS business (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
100,913 |
|
|
|
131,605 |
|
Europe |
|
|
152,060 |
|
|
|
86,170 |
|
Asia |
|
|
61,241 |
|
|
|
64,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS business segment |
|
|
314,214 |
|
|
|
282,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
|
630,852 |
|
|
|
442,223 |
|
Other North America |
|
|
11,408 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Reconciling item (4) |
|
|
(61,481 |
) |
|
|
(11,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
580,779 |
|
|
$ |
430,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operations (5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
153,860 |
|
|
$ |
92,188 |
|
Europe |
|
|
6,882 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
Asia |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operations segment |
|
|
162,909 |
|
|
|
93,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund management (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
71,111 |
|
|
|
13,502 |
|
Europe |
|
|
18,598 |
|
|
|
12,114 |
|
Asia |
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fund management segment |
|
|
95,013 |
|
|
|
28,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDFS business (6)(7): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
34,810 |
|
|
|
28,169 |
|
Europe |
|
|
32,113 |
|
|
|
13,729 |
|
Asia |
|
|
9,650 |
|
|
|
12,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS business segment |
|
|
76,573 |
|
|
|
54,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net operating income |
|
|
334,495 |
|
|
|
176,302 |
|
Other North America |
|
|
5,953 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from other unconsolidated investees |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(33,788 |
) |
|
|
(23,934 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
(72,554 |
) |
|
|
(41,470 |
) |
Merger integration and relocation expenses |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(70,853 |
) |
|
|
(36,493 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reconciling items |
|
|
(174,647 |
) |
|
|
(103,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings before minority interest |
|
$ |
165,801 |
|
|
$ |
72,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operations (8): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
7,667,237 |
|
|
$ |
7,530,062 |
|
Europe |
|
|
667,402 |
|
|
|
673,342 |
|
Asia |
|
|
260,147 |
|
|
|
106,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operations segment |
|
|
8,594,786 |
|
|
|
8,309,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund management (9): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
424,174 |
|
|
|
368,206 |
|
Europe |
|
|
287,456 |
|
|
|
283,435 |
|
Asia |
|
|
114,576 |
|
|
|
103,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fund management segment |
|
|
826,206 |
|
|
|
755,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDFS business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
1,161,145 |
|
|
|
1,142,319 |
|
Europe |
|
|
1,089,390 |
|
|
|
1,062,338 |
|
Asia |
|
|
655,140 |
|
|
|
535,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS business segment |
|
|
2,905,675 |
|
|
|
2,739,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
12,326,667 |
|
|
|
11,804,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other North America |
|
|
481,080 |
|
|
|
901,281 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to other unconsolidated investees |
|
|
167,677 |
|
|
|
27,281 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
254,095 |
|
|
|
191,716 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
24,574 |
|
|
|
38,864 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
152,290 |
|
|
|
150,314 |
|
Discontinued operations assets held for sale |
|
|
258,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reconciling items |
|
|
856,872 |
|
|
|
408,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,664,619 |
|
|
$ |
13,114,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes industrial and retail property rental income. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes fund management revenues and our share of the income or loss recognized under the
equity method from our investment in the property funds along with interest earned on advances
to the property funds, if any. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes proceeds received on CDFS property dispositions, fees earned from customers and
third parties for development activities and interest income on long-term notes receivable
related to asset dispositions. |
|
(4) |
|
Amount represents income from unconsolidated property funds and interest income on long-term
notes receivable that are not presented as a component of revenues in our Consolidated
Statements of Earnings. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes rental income less rental expenses of our industrial and retail properties. Included
in rental expenses are the costs of managing the properties owned by the property funds. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes net gains or losses associated with CDFS property dispositions, fees earned from
customers and third parties for development activities, interest income on notes receivable
related to asset dispositions and our share of the earnings or losses recognized under the
equity method on our investments in CDFS joint ventures. |
|
(7) |
|
Excludes proceeds of $47.8 million and $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively and net gains of $5.0 million and a loss of $0.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, associated with CDFS properties sold to
third parties and presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of
Earnings. See Note 5. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes properties that were developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment that have
not yet been contributed or sold of $1.7 billion and $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively. |
|
(9) |
|
Represents our investment in and advances to the property funds. |
12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Non-cash investing and financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
are as follows:
|
|
|
In connection with the purchase of the 80% ownership interests from our fund
partner in Funds II-IV, we assumed $418.0 million of secured debt. See Note 3. |
|
|
|
|
As partial consideration for properties we contributed to the North American
Industrial Fund, we received ownership interests of $62.1 million, representing a 20%
ownership interest, and the property fund assumed $677.2 million of secured debt and
short-term borrowings. See Note 3. |
21
PROLOGIS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
We received $35.4 million and $15.1 million of equity interests in property
funds from the contribution of properties to these property funds during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
As partial consideration for certain property contributions, we received $1.9
million and $32.6 million in the form of notes receivable from ProLogis North American
Properties Fund V in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The outstanding balance of the notes at
March 31, 2006 was $1.9 million. |
The amount of interest paid in cash, net of amounts capitalized, for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $57.6 million and $46.5 million, respectively.
13. Derivative Financial Instruments:
We use derivative financial instruments as hedges to manage our risk associated with interest
and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on existing or anticipated obligations and
transactions. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
At March 31, 2006, the only outstanding derivative contracts were foreign currency put option
contracts. The activity relating to these contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
New contracts |
|
$ |
92.9 |
|
Settled contracts |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Notional amounts at March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency put option contracts are paid in full at execution and are related to our
operations in Europe and Japan. The put option contracts provide us with the option to exchange
euro, pound sterling and yen for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate such that, if the euro,
pound sterling or yen were to depreciate against the U.S. dollar to predetermined levels as set by
the contracts, we could exercise our options and mitigate our foreign currency exchange losses. The
notional amounts of the put option contracts represent the U.S. dollar equivalent of 18.9
million, £12.2 million and ¥4.9 billion at March 31, 2006.
These contracts generally do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are
marked-to-market through results of operations at the end of each period. Upon expiration of the
contract, the mark-to-market adjustment is reversed, the total cost of the contract is expensed and
any proceeds are recognized as a gain. We recognized net losses/expenses of $113,000 and net gains
of $277,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, on various put option
contracts. These amounts include mark-to-market losses of $22,000 and mark-to-market gains of
$304,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
22
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
ProLogis:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ProLogis and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income and
consolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of ProLogis management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective
of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of ProLogis and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated March 14, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
May 8, 2006
23
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of this report and our 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Certain statements contained in this discussion or elsewhere in this report may be deemed
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates,
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating
performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future
including statements relating to rent and occupancy growth, development activity and changes in
sales or contribution volume of developed properties, general conditions in the geographic areas
where we operate and the availability of capital in existing or new property funds are
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe the
expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we
can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained and therefore, actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking
statements. Some of the factors that may affect outcomes and results include, but are not limited
to: (i) national, international, regional and local economic climates, (ii) changes in financial
markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchanges rates, (iii) increased or unanticipated
competition for our properties, (iv) risks associated with acquisitions, (v) maintenance of real
estate investment trust (REIT) status, (vi) availability of financing and capital, (vii) changes
in demand for developed properties, and (viii) those additional factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms
we, us and our refer to ProLogis and our consolidated subsidiaries.
Managements Overview
We are a self-administered and self-managed REIT that operates a global network of real estate
properties, primarily industrial distribution properties. The primary business drivers across the
globe continue to be the need for greater distribution network efficiency and the growing shift to
third-party logistics providers. Our focus on our customers expanding needs has enabled us to
become a leading global provider of distribution space in three continents.
Our business is organized into three reportable business segments: (i) property operations,
(ii) fund management and (iii) corporate distribution facilities services and other real estate
development business (CDFS business). The property operations segment represents the direct
long-term ownership and the management and leasing of industrial distribution and retail
properties, both directly and indirectly owned. The fund management segment represents the
long-term investment management of unconsolidated property funds and the properties they own, to
generate a high level of returns to us and our fund partners. The CDFS business segment primarily
encompasses our development or acquisition of properties that are rehabilitated or repositioned,
which are generally contributed to an unconsolidated property fund in which we have an ownership
interest and act as manager or sold to third parties.
We generate and seek to increase revenues, earnings, funds from operations (FFO), as defined
below, and cash flows through our segments primarily as follows:
Property Operations Segment
|
|
|
We earn rent from our customers under long-term operating leases, including
reimbursements of certain operating costs, in our industrial distribution and retail
properties that we own directly in North America, Europe and Asia. We expect to grow
our revenue through increases in occupancy rates and rental rates in both our
industrial distribution and retail properties. Our strategy is to achieve these
increases primarily through continued focus on our customers global needs for
distribution space in the three continents in which we operate and use of the ProLogis
Operating System®, an |
24
|
|
|
organizational structure and service delivery system that we built around our customers
and the selective acquisition of industrial distribution properties. |
Fund Management Segment
|
|
|
We recognize our proportionate share of the earnings or losses from our
investments in unconsolidated property funds operating in North America, Europe and
Asia. Along with the income recognized under the equity method, we include fees and
incentives earned for services performed on behalf of the property funds and interest
earned on advances to the property funds, if any. We also earn certain other fees for
services provided to the property funds, such as acquisition, financing and development
fees. We expect growth in income recognized to come from newly created property funds,
as discussed below, growth in existing property funds, as well as increased fees and
incentives. The growth in the existing property funds is expected to come primarily
from additional properties the funds will acquire, generally from us, and increased
rental revenues in the property funds due, in part, to our leasing and property
management efforts by our property operations segment. |
CDFS Business Segment
|
|
|
We recognize income primarily from the contributions of developed,
rehabilitated and repositioned properties to the property funds and from dispositions
to third parties. In addition, we earn fees from our customers or other third parties
for development activities that we provide on their behalf, recognize interest income
on notes receivable related to asset dispositions, recognize net gains from the
disposition of land parcels that no longer fit into our development plans and recognize
our proportionate share of the income generated by development joint ventures in which
we have an investment. We expect increases in this segment to come primarily from the
continued development of high-quality industrial distribution properties in our key
markets in North America, Europe and Asia, resulting in the contribution to property
funds or sale to third parties. In addition, we expect to increase our land and other
commercial development activities for development fees and sales to third parties. |
In September 2005, we completed a merger whereby Catellus Development Corporation was merged
into one of our subsidiaries (the Catellus Merger). The total purchase price of $5.3 billion was
financed through the issuance of 55.9 million ProLogis common shares, the assumption of $1.7
billion of liabilities and cash of $1.3 billion. We financed the cash portion through borrowings on
a short-term bridge facility that has been fully repaid as of March 31, 2006.
Summary of the three months ended March 31, 2006
The fundamentals of our business were strong in the first three months of 2006. We increased
our total operating portfolio of industrial distribution and retail properties owned or managed,
including direct-owned properties, and properties owned by the property funds and CDFS joint
ventures, to 359.7 million square feet at March 31, 2006 from 349.7 million square feet at December
31, 2005. We increased our same store net operating income (as defined below) by 3.7% in the first
quarter of 2006 over the same period in 2005. Our same store average occupancy increased by 4.0%
for the first quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. Same store rent growth was
a negative 1.1% in the first quarter of 2006, compared with a negative 2.1% in the first quarter of
2005. The stabilized leased percentage (as defined below) was 95.2% at March 31, 2006, compared
with 94.5% at December 31, 2005.
Net operating income of the CDFS business segment increased 41.0% in the three months ended
March 31, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, primarily due to increased development fees
and interest income due in part to activities acquired in the Catellus Merger, as well as the
recognition of previously deferred proceeds from contributions. During the quarter, we started the
development of projects with a total expected cost at completion of $887.4 million and completed
development projects at a total cost of $461.6 million. This compares with the first quarter of
2005 when we started development projects with a total expected cost at completion of $732.2
million and completed development projects at a total cost of $178.6 million. The increased
development activity was spurred by increased demand for industrial distribution properties in
North America, Europe and Asia. We believe
25
the strong development activity, along with the access to capital through the property funds
and positive leasing activity, will continue to support increased contribution activity.
Key Transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
We formed the ProLogis North American Industrial Fund (the North American
Industrial Fund), which will primarily own recently developed industrial properties in
the United States and Canada. |
|
|
|
|
During the quarter, we generated net proceeds of $305.0 million from
contributions and sales of CDFS assets, excluding discontinued operations. This
includes our first contribution of assets to the ProLogis Japan Properties Fund II,
which was formed in late 2005 and in which we have a 20% ownership interest. |
|
|
|
|
On January 4, 2006, we purchased the 80% ownership interests in each of
ProLogis North American Properties Funds II, III and IV (Funds II-IV) from our fund
partner. In March 2006, we contributed substantially all of the assets and associated
liabilities we obtained in this acquisition to the North American Industrial Fund. In
connection with this transaction, we recognized: (i) our proportionate share of the
gain on termination of Funds II-IV of $37.1 million; (ii) an incentive return fee of
$22.0 million due to certain return levels achieved by our fund partner, and (iii)
$12.5 million of disposition proceeds that had previously been deferred. These amounts
are net of an aggregate $17.9 million, which was deferred due to our 20% ownership in
the North American Industrial Fund. |
|
|
|
|
During the quarter, we disposed of 31 CDFS and non-CDFS properties to third
parties, which are included in discontinued operations and generated net proceeds of $185.5 million and resulted in the recognition
of $21.4 million of gains. |
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006 we issued $850.0 million of senior notes and used the
proceeds to repay borrowings under the short-term bridge facility that was used to fund
the Catellus Merger and borrowings under our global credit facility (Global Line). |
Results of Operations
Net earnings attributable to common shares was $183.2 million and $55.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Basic and diluted net earnings attributable to
common shares was $0.75 and $0.72 per share, respectively, for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and $0.30 and $0.29 per share, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The
increase in net earnings in 2006 over 2005 is primarily due to the Catellus Merger, the termination
of Funds II-IV, improved property operating performance, and gains on dispositions of assets to
third parties.
Portfolio Information
In the discussion that follows, we present the results of operations by reportable business
segment. The following table summarizes our total operating portfolio of industrial and retail
properties, excluding properties under development, and including properties owned by us, the
properties funds and CDFS joint ventures (square feet in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
March 31,2005 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Business Segment |
|
Properties |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
|
Properties |
|
|
Square Feet |
|
Property operations |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
188,520 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
186,663 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
131,679 |
|
Fund management |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
166,869 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
159,769 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
153,308 |
|
CDFS business |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
359,703 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
349,715 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
287,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stabilized operating properties owned by us, the property funds and CDFS joint
ventures were 95.2% leased at March 31, 2006, 94.5% leased at December 31, 2005 and 92.2% leased at
March 31, 2005. The stabilized properties are those properties where the capital improvements,
repositioning efforts, new management and new marketing programs for acquisitions or the marketing
programs in the case of newly developed properties, have
26
been completed and in effect for a sufficient period of time to achieve stabilization. A
property generally enters the stabilized pool at the earlier of 12 months from acquisition or
completion or when it becomes substantially occupied, which we define generally as 93.0%.
Same Store Analysis
We evaluate the operating performance of the properties included in each of our three
reportable business segments using a same store analysis because the population of properties in
this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in
the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. We include properties owned directly and
indirectly, by the property funds and by the CDFS joint ventures, in the same store analysis.
Accordingly, we define the same store portfolio of operating properties for each period as those
properties that have been in operation throughout the full period in both the current and prior
year. When a property is disposed of to a third party, it is removed from the population for the
full quarter in which it is disposed and the corresponding period of the prior year. The same store
portfolio aggregated 274.4 million square feet at March 31, 2006 and included only industrial
distribution properties.
Same store results were as follows:
|
|
Net operating income generated by the same store
portfolio (defined for the same store analysis as rental
income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less
rental expenses) increased 3.7% for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 over the same period in 2005, due to a 4.1%
increase in rental income and a 5.4% increase in rental
expenses. |
|
|
|
Average occupancy in the same store portfolio
increased 4.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2006
over the same period in 2005. |
|
|
|
The same store portfolios rental rates, associated
with leasing activity for space that has been previously
leased by us, decreased for the three months ended March
31, 2006 by 1.1% over the same period in 2005. |
We believe the factors that impact net operating income, rental rates and average occupancy in
the same store portfolio are the same as for the total portfolio. The percentage change presented
is the weighted average of the measure computed separately for us and each entity individually with
the weighting based on each entitys proportionate share of the combined component on which the
change is computed. In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating
performance, the percentage change computation removes the effects of foreign currency exchange
rate movements by computing each propertys components in that propertys functional currency.
Rental income computed under GAAP applicable to the properties included in the same store
portfolio is adjusted to remove the net termination and renegotiation fees recognized in each
period. Net termination and renegotiation fees excluded from rental income for the same store
portfolio (including properties directly owned and properties owned by the property funds and CDFS
joint ventures) were $0.8 million and $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to
allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by the write-off of the asset
recognized due to the adjustment to straight-line rents over the lease term, if any. Removing the
net termination fees from the same store calculation of rental income allows us to evaluate the
growth or decline in each propertys rental income without regard to items that are not indicative
of the propertys recurring operating performance.
In computing the percentage change in rental expenses, the rental expenses applicable to the
properties in the same store portfolio include property management expenses for our direct-owned
properties. These expenses are based on the property management fee that is provided for in the
individual agreements under which our wholly owned management company provides property management
services to each property (generally, the fee is based on a percentage of revenues). On
consolidation, the management fee income earned by the management company and the management fee
expense recognized by the properties are eliminated and the direct costs of providing property
management services are recognized as part of our rental expenses reported under GAAP.
27
Operational Outlook
Changes in economic conditions will generally impact customer leasing decisions and absorption
of new distribution properties. Since late 2004, we have experienced strong customer demand and
continued strengthening in occupancies across our global markets. Leasing activity continues to
improve with our stabilized portfolio reaching 95.2% leased at March 31, 2006. Market rental rates are
beginning to increase and the negative gap between our current rental rates on expiring leases and
market rents has started to decrease. As a result, we have experienced positive rental rate growth
or only modestly negative rental rate growth over the past several quarters. Growth in global trade
continues to support strong market fundamentals, which in turn, supports the acceleration of our
global development pipeline. We executed 31 million square feet of leases during the three months
ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 45% over the same period in 2005. We expect absorption of
available space to continue to be strong throughout 2006. One of the most important fundamentals to
our long term growth is repeat business with our global customers. Nearly half of the leases in our
newly developed space is being leased to repeat customers.
Property Operations Segment
The net operating income of the property operations segment consists of rental income and
rental expenses from the industrial distribution and retail operating properties that we directly
own. The costs of our property management function for both our direct-owned portfolio and the
properties owned by the property funds are all reported in rental expenses in the property
operations segment. The net earnings or losses generated by operating properties that were
developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment are included in the property operations segment
during the interim period from the date of completion or acquisition through the date the
properties are contributed or sold. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1
for a reconciliation of net operating income to earnings before minority interest. The net
operating income from the property operations segment, which does not include rental income and
rental expenses associated with the industrial distribution and retail properties that are
presented as discontinued operations in our financial statements, was as follows (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
221,625 |
|
|
$ |
131,203 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
58,716 |
|
|
|
37,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operations segment |
|
$ |
162,909 |
|
|
$ |
93,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number and composition of operating properties that we own throughout the periods and the
timing of contributions impact rental income and rental expenses for each period. Rental income
includes net termination and renegotiation fees and rental expense recoveries of $44.9 million and
$25.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
When a property is contributed to a property fund, we begin reporting our share of the
earnings of the property under the equity method in the fund management segment. However, the
overhead costs incurred by us to provide the management services to the property fund continue to
be reported as part of rental expenses. The increases in rental income and rental expenses, in 2006
over 2005, are due primarily to the increase in properties owned through the Catellus Merger and
other acquisitions and increases in the same store properties we directly own. The increase in the
number of properties under management has also contributed to the increase in rental expenses.
Fund Management Segment
The net operating income of the fund management segment consists of: (i) earnings or losses
recognized under the equity method from our investments in the property funds; (ii) fees and
incentives earned for services performed on behalf of the property funds; and (iii) interest earned
on advances to the property funds, if any. The net earnings or losses of the property funds include
the following income and expense items of the property funds, in addition to rental income and
rental expenses: (i) interest income and interest expense; (ii) depreciation and amortization
expenses; (iii) general and administrative expenses; (iv) income tax expense; (v) foreign currency
exchange gains and losses; and (vi) gains on dispositions of properties. See Notes 3 and 11 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for additional information on the property funds and
for a reconciliation of net operating income to earnings before minority interest.
28
The net operating income from the fund management segment was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Earnings from property funds (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American property funds (2) |
|
$ |
71,111 |
|
|
$ |
13,502 |
|
ProLogis European Properties Fund (3) |
|
|
18,598 |
|
|
|
12,114 |
|
Japan property funds (4) |
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fund management segment |
|
$ |
95,013 |
|
|
$ |
28,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The earnings from the property funds includes fees and incentives earned by us for
providing services to the property funds. Fees earned for providing services to the property
funds for other than property management and asset management services can fluctuate from
year to year. The costs of the property management function for the properties owned by the
property funds are reported in the property operations segment and the costs of the fund
management function are included in general and administrative expenses. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the income earned by us from our investments in property funds in North America,
including our proportionate share of the earnings or losses of the property funds and
property management and other fees and incentives. We had interests in 13 and 15 funds at
March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our ownership interests ranged from 11.2% to 50.0% as
of March 31, 2006. With respect to the income from these funds, fluctuations between years in
the amount that we recognize under the equity method are generally due to the number of
property funds, the number of properties owned by the property funds, occupancy levels and
the amount of termination and renegotiation fees earned by the property funds. These property
funds on a combined basis owned 780 and 722 properties at March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. |
In January 2006, we purchased the 80% ownership interests from our fund partner in Funds II-IV
and subsequently contributed substantially all of the assets and associated liabilities to the
North American Industrial Fund. In connection with this transaction, we earned an incentive
return of $22.0 million and recognized $37.1 million in income, representing our proportionate
share of the net gain recognized by Funds II-IV upon termination.
(3) |
|
ProLogis European Properties Fund has continued to acquire properties, primarily from us,
and increase its portfolio size since it began operations. This property fund owned 271 and
234 properties at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Our ownership interest in ProLogis
European Properties Fund was 21.2% at both March 31, 2006 and 2005. The fluctuations in
income recognized from our ownership interest in this property fund are primarily the result
of the following factors: (i) the size of the portfolio and occupancy levels in each period;
(ii) increases in the fees earned for services provided to the property fund due to the
increase in the number of properties managed; (iii) higher interest costs associated with the
higher debt levels that primarily result from the use of debt to acquire the additional
properties; (iv) changes in our ownership interest in each year; and (v) variances in the
average foreign currency exchange rate at which we translate our share of the net earnings of
the property fund to U.S. dollars. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts represent our investments in two property funds in Japan. ProLogis Japan
Properties Fund I has increased its portfolio to 18 properties at March 31, 2006 from 14
properties at March 31, 2005. Our ownership interest in ProLogis Japan Properties Fund I has
been 20.0% since inception. The increases in the amounts recognized under the equity method
from our ownership in this property fund correspond with the growth in the portfolio over the
three years. In September 2005, we formed a second fund in Japan, ProLogis Japan Properties
Fund II. Our ownership interest in ProLogis Japan Properties Fund II was 20% at March 31,
2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we made our first contribution of a
property to this fund, which did not own any properties in 2005, and the fund acquired four
properties from third parties. |
CDFS Business
Net operating income from the CDFS business segment consists primarily of: (i) gains and
losses resulting from the contributions and dispositions of properties, generally developed by us
or acquired with the intent to rehabilitate or reposition; (ii) gains and losses from the
dispositions of land parcels; (iii) fees earned for development services
29
provided to customers and third parties; (iv) interest income earned on notes receivable
related to property dispositions; (v) our proportionate share of the earnings or losses of CDFS
joint ventures; and (vi) certain costs associated with potential acquisition of CDFS business
assets and land holding costs. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for a
reconciliation of net operating income to earnings before minority interest.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our net operating income in this segment was $76.6
million, as compared to $54.3 million for the same period in 2005, an increase of $22.3 million, or
41.0% (an increase of $27.7 million or 51.4% when the gains from CDFS business transactions
recognized as discontinued operations are included). In 2006, 45.5% of the net operating income of
this operating segment was generated in North America, 41.9% was generated in Europe and 12.6% was
generated in Asia.
The CDFS business segments net operating income includes the following components (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
CDFS transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition proceeds, prior to deferral (1) |
|
$ |
315,786 |
|
|
$ |
293,849 |
|
Proceeds deferred and not recognized (2) |
|
|
(23,608 |
) |
|
|
(11,258 |
) |
Recognition of previously deferred amounts (2) |
|
|
12,832 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cost of CDFS dispositions (1) |
|
|
(238,286 |
) |
|
|
(227,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains |
|
|
66,724 |
|
|
|
55,341 |
|
Development management and other income (3) |
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Interest income on long-term notes receivable (4) |
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net earnings from CDFS joint ventures (5) |
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Other expenses and charges (6) |
|
|
(2,411 |
) |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDFS business segment |
|
$ |
76,573 |
|
|
$ |
54,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDFS transactions recognized as discontinued operations (7): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition proceeds |
|
$ |
47,765 |
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
Cost of dispositions |
|
|
(42,746 |
) |
|
|
(3,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net CDFS gains (losses) in discontinued operations |
|
$ |
5,019 |
|
|
$ |
(439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we contributed 15 buildings to the property funds (five in North
America, nine in Europe and one in Japan) generating a net gain of $44.0 million, compared
with 16 buildings contributed during the same period in 2005 (10 in North America, five in
Europe and one in Japan) generating a net gain of $51.8 million. In addition, we recognized
net gains of $10.5 million and $2.2 million from the disposition of land parcels during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
When we contribute a property to a property fund in which we have an ownership interest, we
do not recognize a portion of the proceeds in the computation of the gain resulting from the
contribution, based on our continuing ownership interest in the contributed property that
arises due to our ownership interest in the property fund that acquires the property. We
defer this portion of the proceeds by recognizing a reduction to our investment in the
respective property fund. We adjust our proportionate share of earnings or losses that we
recognize under the equity method from the property fund in later periods to reflect the
property funds depreciation expense as if the depreciation expense was computed on our lower
basis in the contributed property rather than on the property funds basis in the contributed
property. If a loss results when a property is contributed to a property fund, the entire
loss is recognized. |
When a property that we originally contributed to a property fund is disposed of to a third
party by the property fund, we recognize in earnings the net amount of proceeds we had
previously deferred in the period that the disposition to the third party occurs, in
addition to our proportionate share of the net gain or loss recognized by the property fund.
Further, during periods when our ownership interest in a property fund decreases, we
recognize gains to the extent that previously deferred proceeds are recognized to coincide
with our new ownership interest in the property fund. This amount includes $12.5 million in
2006 related to the termination of Funds II-IV.
30
|
(3) |
|
Amounts include fees we earned for the performance of development activities. The increase
in 2006 is due primarily to development undertaken since the Catellus Merger and increased
development management activity in Europe. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Amount in 2006 represents interest income earned on notes receivable related to previous property
sales that were acquired in the Catellus Merger. |
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents the net earnings we recognized under the equity method from our investments in
CDFS joint ventures. The increase in 2006 is due primarily to earnings recognized in our
investments in joint ventures acquired in connection with the Catellus Merger. |
|
|
(6) |
|
Includes land holding costs and charges for previously capitalized pursuit costs related to
potential CDFS business segment projects when the acquisition is no longer probable. |
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes two CDFS business properties aggregating 0.2 million square feet and one CDFS
business property aggregating 0.1 million square feet that were sold to third parties during
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, that met the criteria to be
presented as discontinued operations. |
Income from the CDFS business segment is dependent on several factors, including but not
limited to: (i) our ability to develop and timely lease properties, (ii) our ability to acquire
properties that eventually can be contributed to property funds after rehabilitating or
repositioning, (iii) our ability to generate a profit from these activities and (iv) our success in
raising capital to be used by the property funds to acquire the properties we developed or
repositioned. There can be no assurance we will be able to maintain or increase the current level
of net operating income in this segment and we continue to monitor leasing activity and general
economic conditions as it pertains to the CDFS business segment.
Other Components of Income
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $33.8 million and $23.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Fluctuations in general and administrative expenses
are influenced by the various business initiatives we are undertaking in a given period. The
increase in general and administrative expenses in 2006 over 2005 is primarily due to the overall
growth of the company resulting from the continuing international expansion of our operating
platform, the Catellus Merger and the formation of additional property funds.
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R Share Based Payment (SFAS 123R) that required
companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity
instrument based on the awards fair value on the grant date and recognize the cost over the period
during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, generally the
vesting period. We adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006. The adoption did not have a significant
impact on our results of operations. See Notes 1 and 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 1.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $72.6 million and $41.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in 2006 over 2005 is due primarily
to the increased level of real estate assets and intangible lease assets acquired in the Catellus
Merger and other acquisitions and improvements of properties in our property operations segment
during this period.
Merger Integration and Relocation Expenses
Merger integration costs are indirect costs associated with the Catellus Merger, such as
employee transition costs as well as severance costs for certain of our employees whose
responsibilities became redundant after the merger. We expect to incur integration costs associated
with the Catellus Merger through the first half of 2006, although the majority of these costs have
already been incurred.
31
The relocation expenses relate to the move of our corporate headquarters in the first quarter
of 2006 and the relocation of our information technology and corporate accounting functions from El
Paso, Texas to Denver, Colorado in the first quarter of 2005.
Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of interest expense (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross interest expense |
|
$ |
96,485 |
|
|
$ |
47,563 |
|
Amortization of (premium) discount, net |
|
|
(3,224 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense before capitalization |
|
|
94,259 |
|
|
|
48,933 |
|
Less: capitalized amounts |
|
|
(23,406 |
) |
|
|
(12,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
$ |
70,853 |
|
|
$ |
36,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as compared with
the same period in 2005, is due to increases in our borrowings, primarily as a result of the
Catellus Merger, our increased investments in property funds and CDFS joint ventures, individual
and portfolio acquisitions and increased development activity, offset somewhat by a decline in
weighted average interest rates and additional capitalized interest. The increase in capitalized
interest for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as compared with the same period in 2005, is
due to the significant increase in our development activities.
Foreign Currency Exchange Gains (Expenses/Losses), Net
We and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany or third party debt
that is not denominated in that entitys functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against
the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss can result. To mitigate our foreign currency
exchange exposure, we borrow in the functional currency of the borrowing entity when possible.
Certain of our intercompany debt is remeasured with the resulting adjustment recognized as a
cumulative translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders
equity. This treatment is applicable to intercompany debt that is deemed a permanent source of
capital to the subsidiary or investee. If the intercompany debt is deemed not permanent in nature,
when the debt is remeasured, we recognize a gain or loss in earnings. Additionally, we utilize
derivative financial instruments to manage certain foreign currency exchange risks, primarily put
option contracts with notional amounts corresponding to a portion of our projected net operating
income from our operations in Europe and Japan. See Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1.
32
Income Taxes
We and one of our consolidated subsidiaries have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the Code), and are not generally required to pay
federal income taxes if we make distributions in excess of taxable income and meet the REIT
requirements of the Code. Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries in the United States are subject
to federal income taxes and we are taxed in certain states in which we operate. In addition, the
foreign countries where we have operations do not recognize REITs under their respective tax laws.
Accordingly, we recognize income taxes for these jurisdictions, as necessary.
Current income tax expense is generally a function of the level of income recognized by our
taxable subsidiaries operating primarily in the CDFS business segment, state income taxes, taxes
incurred in foreign jurisdictions and interest associated with our income tax liabilities. Current
income taxes were $13.2 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The increase in 2006 over 2005 is due primarily to disposition activity in the
United Kingdom, interest expense on tax liabilities and additional income in our taxable
subsidiaries due to the Catellus Merger.
The deferred income tax component of total income taxes is generally a function of the
periods temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for book
purposes), the utilization of tax net operating losses generated in prior years that had been
previously recognized as deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities related to
indemnification agreements related to certain contributions to property funds.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations represent a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or
is classified as held for sale if both the operations and cash flows of the component have been or
will be eliminated from ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction
and the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the
component after the disposal transaction. The results of operations of the component of the entity
that has been classified as discontinued operations are reported separately as discontinued
operations in the statements of earnings. From time to time, we dispose of properties to third
parties that are included in our property operations segment. The results of operations for these
properties, as well as the gain or loss recognized upon disposition, are included in discontinued
operations. In addition, as of March 31, 2006, we had 19 office properties and one hotel property
classified as held for sale and therefore, the results of operations of those properties are also
included in discontinued operations. See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1
for further discussion of discontinued operations.
Environmental Matters
A majority of the properties acquired by us were subjected to environmental reviews either by
us or the previous owners. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and
sampling, none of the environmental assessments have revealed an environmental liability that we
believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
In connection with the Catellus Merger, we acquired certain properties in urban and industrial
areas that may have been leased to or previously owned by commercial and industrial companies that
discharged hazardous materials. In accordance with purchase accounting, we recorded a liability for
the estimated costs of environmental remediation to be incurred in connection with certain
operating properties acquired and properties previously sold by Catellus. This liability was
established to cover the environmental remediation costs, including cleanup costs, consulting fees
for studies and investigations, monitoring costs and legal costs relating to cleanup, litigation
defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. In addition, we will incur environmental
remediation costs associated with certain land parcels in connection with the future development of
the land and have recorded a liability for the estimated costs of remediation. We purchase various
environmental insurance policies to mitigate our potential exposure to environmental liabilities.
We are not aware of any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
33
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We consider our ability to generate cash from operating activities, contributions and
disposition of properties and from available financing sources to be adequate to meet our
anticipated future development, acquisition, operating, debt service and shareholder distribution
requirements.
Our credit facilities, primarily the Global Line, provide liquidity and financial flexibility,
which allows us to efficiently respond to market opportunities and execute our business strategy.
Regular repayments of our credit facilities are necessary to allow us to maintain adequate
liquidity. We anticipate future repayments of the borrowings under our credit facilities will be
funded primarily through the proceeds from future property contributions and dispositions, and from
proceeds generated by future issuances of debt or equity securities, depending on market
conditions.
In addition to common share distributions and preferred share dividend requirements, we expect
our primary short and long-term cash needs will consist of the following for 2006 and future years:
|
|
|
Development of properties directly and additional investment in joint ventures
in the CDFS business segment; |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of properties in the CDFS business segment; |
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of land for future development in the CDFS business segment; |
|
|
|
|
Direct acquisitions of operating properties and/or portfolios of operating
properties in key distribution markets for direct, long-term investment in the property
operations segment; and |
|
|
|
|
Scheduled principal and interest payments and repayment of debt that is
scheduled to mature. |
We expect to fund cash needs for 2006 and future years primarily with cash from the following
sources, all subject to market conditions:
|
|
|
property operations; |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the contributions of properties to property funds; |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the sale of certain office and hotel properties acquired in the
Catellus Merger and classified as held for sale; |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the disposition of land parcels and properties to third parties; |
|
|
|
|
utilization of the Global Line or other lines of credit; |
|
|
|
|
assumption of debt in connection with acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the issuance of equity or debt securities, including sales under various common share plans. |
On March 27, 2006, we issued $450.0 million of 5.5% senior notes due April 1, 2012 and $400.0
million of 5.75% senior notes due April 1, 2016. We used the net proceeds to repay short-term
borrowings under the bridge facility used in the Catellus Merger and the Global Line.
We are committed to offer to contribute substantially all of our stabilized industrial
development properties in Canada and the United States to the North American Industrial Fund. The
North American Industrial Fund has equity commitments, which expire in February 2009 aggregating
approximately $1.5 billion from third party investors, of which $1.2 billion was unfunded at March
31, 2006. We are committed to offer to contribute certain existing industrial distribution
properties in the United States and Mexico to ProLogis North American Properties
34
Fund V prior to offering for contribution or sale to any third party, subject to certain
conditions, through December 31, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we contributed
certain assets to ProLogis North American Properties Fund V for approximately $95 million. We
estimate our remaining commitment under this arrangement is $255 million at March 31, 2006.
We are committed to offer to contribute all of our stabilized development properties available
in specific markets in Europe to ProLogis European Properties Fund as long as the fund has capital
to invest. ProLogis European Properties Fund has equity commitments from nine investors through
subscription agreements, which expire in August 2006, aggregating
636.6 million (the currency equivalent of approximately
$767.4 million at March 31, 2006) of which
140.8 million (the currency equivalent of
approximately $169.7 million at March 31, 2006) was unfunded at March 31, 2006.
We are committed to offer to contribute all of our stabilized development properties available
in Japan to Prologis Japan Properties Fund II through August 2008. ProLogis Japan Properties Fund
II has equity commitments aggregating $600 million from our fund partner, which expire in August
2008 and of which $523.4 million was unfunded at March 31, 2006.
These property funds are committed to acquire such properties, subject to certain exceptions,
including that the properties meet certain specified leasing and other criteria, and that the
property funds have available capital. We believe that, while the current capital commitments and
borrowing capacities of these property funds may be expended prior to the expiration dates of these
commitments, each property fund will have sufficient capital to acquire the properties that we
expect to have available during 2006. Should the property funds choose not to acquire, or not have
sufficient capital available to acquire, a property that meets the specified criteria, the rights
under the agreement with regard to that specific property will terminate.
There can be no assurance that if these property funds do not continue to acquire the
properties that we have available, that we will be able to secure other sources of capital such
that we can contribute or sell these properties in a timely manner and continue to generate profits
from our development activities in a particular reporting period.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net
cash provided by operating activities was $175.2 million and $99.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities in 2006 over 2005 is due to the increase in earnings related primarily to the Catellus
Merger and improved property performance. Cash provided by operating activities exceeded the cash
distributions paid on common shares and dividends paid on preferred shares in both periods.
Cash Investing and Cash Financing Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, investing activities used net cash of
$677.2 million and $254.9 million, respectively. The net cash used is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Investments in real estate (both acquisition and development expenditures), as
well as recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and lease commissions on
previously leased space required cash of $893.5 million during the three months ended March
31, 2006 and $554.0 million for the same period in 2005, respectively. At March 31, 2006,
we had 96 properties aggregating 27.7 million square feet under development, with a total
expected investment of $2.2 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Invested net cash in unconsolidated investees of
$102.2 million (primarily a preferred investment in a subsidiary
of ProLogis North American Properties Fund V) and $16.8 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Generated net cash from contributions and dispositions of properties and land
parcels of $540.9 million and $255.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Invested cash of $259.2 million in connection with the purchase of our fund
partners ownership interests in Funds II-IV. |
35
|
|
|
Generated net cash proceeds from payments on notes receivable related to
dispositions of assets of $36.9 and $60.0 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, financing activities provided net cash of
$564.3 million and $266.9 million, respectively, as summarized below.
|
|
|
Received net proceeds of $839.1 million from the issuance of the $850.0 million
senior notes issued in March 2006. Made net payments on all other debt of $177.7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and received net proceeds from all borrowings of
$331.8 million for the corresponding period in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to holders of common shares were $97.7 million and $68.9
million during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Minority
interest redemptions and distributions were $6.2 million and $2.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Dividends paid on preferred shares were
$6.4 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Generated net proceeds from sales and issuances of common shares of $13.2
million and $12.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
Borrowing Capacities
At March 31, 2006, we had outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities, including the
Global Line, of approximately $1.8 billion and
$67.1 million letters of credit outstanding with participating
lenders resulting in
remaining availability of $713.7 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Liquidity and Capital Resources of Our Unconsolidated Investees
We had investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees of $1.2 billion at March 31,
2006, of which $0.8 billion relates to our investments in the property funds. Summarized financial
information for the unconsolidated property funds (for the entire entity, not our proportionate
share) at March 31, 2006 is presented below (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Party |
|
|
Our |
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
Debt (1) |
|
|
Ownership % |
|
ProLogis California |
|
$ |
615.7 |
|
|
$ |
328.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I |
|
|
337.5 |
|
|
|
242.3 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(1) |
|
|
1,634.3 |
|
|
|
755.7 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI |
|
|
514.5 |
|
|
|
307.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII |
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
229.1 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII |
|
|
193.9 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX |
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X |
|
|
218.1 |
|
|
|
135.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI |
|
|
232.5 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis North American Industrial Fund |
|
|
801.8 |
|
|
|
475.4 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis European Properties Fund |
|
|
4,233.5 |
|
|
|
2,082.9 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund I |
|
|
1,243.8 |
|
|
|
535.4 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund II |
|
|
309.6 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property funds |
|
$ |
10,916.2 |
|
|
$ |
5,491.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of March 31, 2006, we had guaranteed $42.0 million of borrowings that ProLogis North
American Properties Fund V had outstanding on a term loan that matures in September 2006. We
do not have any outstanding guarantees on any other debt of the unconsolidated property funds. |
36
Contractual Obligations
Distribution and Dividend Requirements
Our common share distribution policy is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow that
ensures we will meet the distribution requirements of the Code relating to a REIT while still
allowing us to maximize the cash retained to meet other cash needs such as capital improvements and
other investment activities. Because depreciation is a non-cash expense, cash flow typically will
be greater than operating income and net earnings.
Cash distributions per common share paid during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
were $0.40 and $0.37, respectively. In December 2005, our Board of Trustees (the Board) approved
an increase in the annual distribution for 2006 from $1.48 to $1.60 per common share. The payment
of common share distributions is dependent upon our financial condition and operating results and
may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year. A distribution of $0.40 per common
share for the first quarter of 2006 was declared on February 1, 2006. This distribution was paid on
February 28, 2006 to holders of common shares on February 15, 2006. A distribution of $0.40 per
common share for the second quarter of 2006 was declared on May 1, 2006 to be paid on May 31, 2006
to holders of common shares on May 16, 2006.
At March 31, 2006, we had three series of preferred shares outstanding. The annual dividend
rates on preferred shares are $4.27 per Series C preferred share, $1.69 per Series F preferred
share and $1.69 per Series G preferred share. The dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the
last day of each quarter.
Pursuant to the terms of our preferred shares, we are restricted from declaring or paying any
distribution with respect to our common shares unless and until all cumulative dividends with
respect to the preferred shares have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for
dividends that have been declared for the then current dividend period with respect to the
preferred shares.
Other Commitments
At March 31, 2006, we had letters of intent or contingent contracts, subject to final due
diligence, for the acquisition of properties aggregating approximately eight million square feet at
an estimated total acquisition cost of approximately $500 million. These transactions are subject
to a number of conditions and we cannot predict with certainty that they will be consummated.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Funds from Operations
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. The
most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO is net earnings. Although NAREIT has published a
definition of FFO, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of FFO are common among REITs, as
companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their business. FFO, as we
define it, is presented as a supplemental financial measure. We do not use FFO as, nor should it be
considered to be, an alternative to net earnings computed under GAAP as an indicator of our
operating performance or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP as
an indicator of our ability to fund our cash needs.
FFO is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not
present, nor do we intend it to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and
operating performance. We believe net earnings computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of
performance and that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings
computed under GAAP. Further, we believe our consolidated financial statements, prepared in
accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition and our
operating performance.
37
NAREITs FFO measure adjusts net earnings computed under GAAP to exclude historical cost
depreciation and gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated properties. These two
NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons:
(a) historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP assumes,
through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on FFO since real estate asset values have historically
risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be
insufficient by themselves. Consequently, NAREITs definition of FFO reflects the fact that
real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges
required by GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities.
(b) REITs were created as a legal form of organization in order to encourage public
ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business
of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREITs definition of
FFO, of gains and losses from the sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets
allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets
that form the core of a REITs activity and assists in comparing those operating results between
periods. We include the gains and losses from dispositions of properties acquired or developed
in our CDFS business segment and our proportionate share of the gains
and losses from dispositions recognized by the property funds in our definition of FFO.
At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its FFO concept for the REIT industry, it
also recognized that management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and
authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.
We believe financial analysts, potential investors and shareholders who review our operating
results are best served by a defined FFO measure that includes other adjustments to net earnings
computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure of FFO.
Our defined FFO measure excludes the following items from net earnings computed under GAAP
that are not excluded in the NAREIT defined FFO measure:
|
(i) |
|
deferred income tax benefits and deferred income tax expenses recognized by our
subsidiaries; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
certain foreign currency exchange gains and losses resulting from certain debt
transactions between us and our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign
unconsolidated investees; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement (based on
current foreign currency exchange rates) of certain third party debt of our foreign
consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated investees; and |
|
|
(iv) |
|
mark-to-market adjustments associated with derivative financial instruments
utilized to manage foreign currency risks. |
FFO of our unconsolidated investees is calculated on the same basis.
The items that we exclude from net earnings computed under GAAP, while not infrequent or
unusual, are subject to significant fluctuations from period to period that cause both positive and
negative effects on our results of operations, in inconsistent and unpredictable directions. Most
importantly, the economics underlying the items that we exclude from net earnings computed under
GAAP are not the primary drivers in managements decision-making process and capital investment
decisions. Period to period fluctuations in these items can be driven by accounting for short-term
factors that are not relevant to long-term investment decisions, long-term capital structures or
long-term tax planning and tax structuring decisions. Accordingly, we believe investors are best
served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and
evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and
executing our business strategy.
Real estate is a capital-intensive business. Investors analyses of the performance of real
estate companies tend to be centered on understanding the asset value created by real estate
investment decisions and understanding current operating returns that are being generated by those
same investment decisions. The adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP that are included in
arriving at our FFO measure are helpful to management in making real estate investment decisions
and evaluating our current operating performance. We believe these adjustments are also helpful to
industry analysts, potential investors and shareholders in their understanding and
38
evaluation of our performance on the key measures of net asset value and current operating
returns generated on real estate investments.
While we believe our defined FFO measure is an important supplemental measure, neither
NAREITs nor our measure of FFO should be used alone because they exclude significant economic
components of net earnings computed under GAAP and are, therefore, limited as an analytical tool.
Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are
excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be
necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Further, the amortization of
capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of
distribution properties are not reflected in FFO. |
|
|
|
|
Gains or losses from property dispositions represent changes in the value of
the disposed properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized
changes in the value of disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our
defined FFO measure result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability
that may have to be settled at some future point. Our defined FFO measure does not
currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement. |
|
|
|
|
The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our
defined FFO measure are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency
exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign
currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measure is
limited in that it does not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that
result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements. |
We compensate for these limitations by using the FFO measure only in conjunction with net
earnings computed under GAAP. To further compensate, we always reconcile our FFO measure to net
earnings computed under GAAP in our financial reports. Additionally, we provide investors with
complete financial statements prepared under GAAP; our definition of FFO, which includes a
discussion of the limitations of using our non-GAAP measure; and a reconciliation of our GAAP
measure (net earnings) to our non-GAAP measure (FFO, as we define it), so that investors can
appropriately incorporate this measure and its limitations into their analyses.
FFO attributable to common shares as defined by us was $225.3 million and $106.0 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The reconciliations of FFO
attributable to common shares as defined by us to net earnings attributable to common shares
computed under GAAP are as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net earnings to FFO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to common shares |
|
$ |
183,159 |
|
|
$ |
55,074 |
|
Add (deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69,671 |
|
|
|
39,725 |
|
Additional CDFS proceeds recognized |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains recognized on dispositions of certain non-CDFS business assets, net |
|
|
(13,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items attributable to discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains recognized on dispositions of non-CDFS business assets, net |
|
|
(16,428 |
) |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals discontinued operations |
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,220 |
|
|
|
13,131 |
|
Gains on dispositions of non-CDFS business assets, net |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
Other amortization items |
|
|
(10,595 |
) |
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals unconsolidated investees |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Totals NAREIT defined adjustments |
|
|
44,791 |
|
|
|
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotals NAREIT defined FFO |
|
|
227,950 |
|
|
|
105,933 |
|
Add (deduct) our defined adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange expenses / losses (gains), net |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Reconciling items attributable to discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets disposed of deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gains, net |
|
|
(2,223 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals unconsolidated investees |
|
|
(3,810 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals our defined adjustments |
|
|
(2,652 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to common shares as defined by us |
|
$ |
225,298 |
|
|
$ |
106,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of March 31, 2006, no material changes had occurred in our interest rate risk or foreign
currency risk as discussed in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Also, see Note 13 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for information related to instruments that we utilize
to manage certain of these risks.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c)) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2006. Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we and our unconsolidated investees are party to a variety of legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such
matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matters will not
result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
As of March 31, 2006, no material changes had occurred in our risk factors as discussed in our
2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We issued 180,000 common shares, upon exchange of limited partnership units in our
consolidated real estate partnerships. These common shares were issued in transactions exempt from
registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
40
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
KPMG LLP Awareness Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROLOGIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Dessa M. Bokides
Dessa M. Bokides
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey S. Finnin
Jeffrey S. Finnin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: May 9, 2006
42
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
KPMG LLP Awareness Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |