Hanesbrands Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to
|
Commission file number:
001-32891
Hanesbrands Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
20-3552316
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
1000 East Hanes Mill Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
|
|
27105
|
(Address of principal executive
office)
|
|
(Zip
code)
|
(336) 519-4400
(Registrants telephone
number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 1, 2006, there were 96,306,232 shares
of the registrants common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Trademarks,
Trade Names and Service Marks
We own or have rights to use the trademarks, service marks and
trade names that we use in conjunction with the operation of our
business. Some of the more important trademarks that we own or
have rights to use that appear in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
include the Hanes, Champion, C9 by Champion, Playtex, Bali,
Leggs, Just My Size, barely there and Wonderbra
marks, which may be registered in the United States and
other jurisdictions. Each trademark, trade name or service mark
of any other company appearing in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
is, to our knowledge, owned by such other company.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and other materials we have filed or will file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC,
contain, or will contain, certain forward-looking statements
regarding business strategies, market potential, future
financial performance and other matters. Forward-looking
statements include all statements that do not relate solely to
historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by
the use of words such as may, believe,
will, expect, project,
estimate, intend,
anticipate, plan, continue
or similar expressions. In particular, information included
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected in
these statements.
Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an
expectation or belief as to future results or events, such
expectation or belief is based on the current plans and
expectations of our management and expressed in good faith and
believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no
assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be
achieved or accomplished. More information on factors that could
affect the Companys financial results is included from
time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006.
These forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties
and other factors speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to
disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking
statement contained herein to reflect any change in our
expectations with regard thereto or any other change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is
based, other than as required by law.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You can inspect, read and
copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at
the public reference facilities the SEC maintains at 100 F
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
We make available free of charge at www.hanesbrands.com (in the
Investors section) copies of materials we file with,
or furnish to, the SEC. You can also obtain copies of these
materials at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference
Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the public
reference facilities by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a Web site at www.sec.gov that makes
available reports, proxy statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with it. By referring
to our website, www.hanesbrands.com, we do not incorporate our
website or its contents into this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
HANESBRANDS
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Statements of Income
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,118,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,961
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
753,337
|
|
|
|
768,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
365,631
|
|
|
|
369,519
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
262,426
|
|
|
|
265,927
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
93,892
|
|
|
|
103,820
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
17,569
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
76,323
|
|
|
|
99,737
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
25,978
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,345
|
|
|
$
|
82,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
96,306
|
|
|
|
96,306
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
96,319
|
|
|
|
96,306
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
HANESBRANDS
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
July 1, 2006*
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
209,080
|
|
|
$
|
298,252
|
|
Accounts receivable, less
allowances of $44,380 at September 30, 2006 and $41,628 at
July 1, 2006
|
|
|
516,778
|
|
|
|
523,430
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,262,961
|
|
|
|
1,236,586
|
|
Deferred tax assets and other
current assets
|
|
|
168,810
|
|
|
|
151,263
|
|
Due from related entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273,428
|
|
Notes receivable from parent
companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111,167
|
|
Funding receivable with parent
companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,157,629
|
|
|
|
3,755,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net
|
|
|
609,048
|
|
|
|
617,021
|
|
Trademarks and other identifiable
intangibles, net
|
|
|
138,395
|
|
|
|
136,364
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
278,725
|
|
|
|
278,655
|
|
Deferred tax assets and other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
417,406
|
|
|
|
103,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,601,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,891,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders or Parent Companies Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and bank
overdrafts
|
|
$
|
203,972
|
|
|
$
|
483,033
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
403,905
|
|
|
|
368,561
|
|
Notes payable to banks
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Sara Lee Corporation
|
|
|
26,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,115
|
|
Notes payable to parent companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,830
|
|
Notes payable to related entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
665,434
|
|
|
|
1,611,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,573,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
346,034
|
|
|
|
49,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,584,968
|
|
|
|
1,661,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders or parent
companies equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (50,000,000
authorized shares; $.01 par value)
Issued and outstanding None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (500,000,000
authorized shares; $.01 par value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding
96,306,232 quarter ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
73,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (for the period
subsequent to September 5, 2006)
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(67,032
|
)
|
|
|
(8,384
|
)
|
Parent companies equity
investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,237,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders or parent
companies equity
|
|
|
16,235
|
|
|
|
3,229,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders or parent companies equity
|
|
$
|
3,601,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,891,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Derived from audited financial statements |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
HANESBRANDS
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders or Parent Companies Equity
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances at July 1,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,384
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,237,518
|
|
|
$
|
3,229,134
|
|
Net income from July 2, 2006
through September 4, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,115
|
|
|
|
41,115
|
|
Net transactions with parent
companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(804,910
|
)
|
|
|
(804,910
|
)
|
Payments to Sara Lee Corporation
in connection with the spin off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,400,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,400,000
|
)
|
Consummation of spin off
transaction on September 5, 2006, including distribution of
Hanesbrands Inc. common stock by Sara Lee Corporation
|
|
|
96,306
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
72,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Net income from September 5,
2006 through September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,338
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,813
|
)
|
Net unrealized loss on qualifying
cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at September 30,
2006
|
|
|
96,306
|
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
$
|
73,074
|
|
|
$
|
9,230
|
|
|
$
|
(67,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
HANESBRANDS
Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,345
|
|
|
$
|
82,604
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
27,906
|
|
|
|
23,258
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
(3,955
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities,
net of business acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
6,791
|
|
|
|
53,645
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(25,782
|
)
|
|
|
27,658
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(10,749
|
)
|
|
|
9,692
|
|
Due to and from related entities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(8,657
|
)
|
|
|
(31,439
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
|
|
13,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
54,813
|
|
|
|
175,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(20,181
|
)
|
|
|
(19,419
|
)
|
Acquisitions of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,436
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(18,565
|
)
|
|
|
(15,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
Borrowings on notes payable to
banks
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
Repayments on notes payable to
banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,584
|
)
|
Issuance of debt under credit
facilities
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of debt issuance
|
|
|
(45,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to Sara Lee Corporation
|
|
|
(2,400,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in bank overdraft
|
|
|
(270,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net transactions with parent
companies
|
|
|
186,010
|
|
|
|
(887,960
|
)
|
Net transactions with related
entities
|
|
|
(195,381
|
)
|
|
|
106,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(125,193
|
)
|
|
|
(798,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in foreign
exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(89,172
|
)
|
|
|
(634,503
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
298,252
|
|
|
|
1,080,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
209,080
|
|
|
$
|
446,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
HANESBRANDS
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(1) Background
and Basis of Presentation
These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and, in accordance with those rules and
regulations, do not include all information and footnote
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate for a
fair statement of the Companys results of operations,
financial position and cash flows. In the opinion of management,
the condensed combined and consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of
operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim
periods presented herein. The preparation of condensed combined
and consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results
may vary from these estimates.
These condensed combined and consolidated interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the combined and
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Companys most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The results of operations for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be
expected for the full year.
On February 10, 2005, Sara Lee Corporation (Sara
Lee), announced an overall transformation plan to drive
long-term growth and performance, which included spinning off
Sara Lees apparel business in the Americas and Asia (the
Branded Apparel Americas and Asia Business). In
connection with the spin off, Sara Lee incorporated Hanesbrands
Inc., a Maryland corporation (Hanesbrands and,
together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the
Company), to which it would transfer the assets and
liabilities related to the Branded Apparel Americas and Asia
Business. On August 31, 2006, Sara Lee transferred to the
Company substantially all the assets and liabilities, at
historical cost, comprising the Branded Apparel Americas and
Asia Business.
On September 5, 2006, as a condition to the distribution to
Sara Lees stockholders of all of the outstanding shares of
the common stock of Hanesbrands, the Company distributed to Sara
Lee a cash dividend payment of $1,950,000 and repaid a loan from
Sara Lee in the amount of $450,000, and Sara Lee distributed to
its stockholders all of the outstanding shares of
Hanesbrands common stock, with each stockholder receiving
one share of Hanesbrands common stock for each eight
shares of Sara Lees common stock that they held as of the
August 18, 2006 record date. As a result of such
distribution, Sara Lee ceased to own any equity interest in the
Company and the Company became an independent, separately
traded, publicly held company.
The condensed combined and consolidated financial statements
reflect the consolidated operations of Hanesbrands Inc. and its
subsidiaries as a separate, stand-alone entity subsequent to
September 5, 2006, in addition to the historical operations
of the Branded Apparel Americas and Asia Business which were
operated as part of Sara Lee prior to the spin off. These
condensed combined and consolidated financial statements do not
include Sara Lees European branded apparel operations or
its private label business in the U.K. which have historically
been operated and managed separately from the Branded Apparel
Americas and Asia Business and have been or will be disposed of
separately by Sara Lee. Under Sara Lees ownership, certain
of the Branded Apparel Americas and Asia Businesss
operations were divisions of Sara Lee and not separate legal
entities, while the Branded Apparel Americas and Asia
Businesss foreign operations were subsidiaries of Sara
Lee. Because a direct ownership relationship did not exist among
the various units comprising the Branded Apparel Americas and
Asia Business prior to the spin off on September 5, 2006,
Sara Lees parent companies equity investment is
shown in lieu of stockholders equity in the condensed
combined and consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to
the spin off on September 5, 2006, the Company began
accumulating its retained earnings and recognized the par value
and
paid-in-capital
in connection with the issuance of approximately
96,306 shares of common stock.
6
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Management believes the assumptions underlying the condensed
combined and consolidated financial statements for these periods
are reasonable. However, the condensed combined and consolidated
financial statements included herein for the period through
September 5, 2006 do not necessarily reflect the Branded
Apparel Americas and Asia Businesss results of operations,
financial position and cash flows in the future or what its
results of operations, financial position and cash flows would
have been had the Branded Apparel Americas and Asia Business
been a stand-alone company during the periods presented.
(2) Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) was computed by
dividing net income by the number of weighted average shares of
common stock outstanding during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. Diluted EPS was calculated to give
effect to all potentially dilutive shares of common stock.
Outstanding stock options and restricted stock units represent
the only potentially dilutive effects on the Companys
weighted average shares. There were no shares excluded from the
calculation as a result of being anti-dilutive.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, there were 13
dilutive shares for purposes of computing diluted EPS. For the
quarter ended October 1, 2005, basic and diluted EPS were
computed using the number of shares of Hanesbrands stock
outstanding on September 5, 2006, the date on which
Hanesbrands common stock was distributed to stockholders of Sara
Lee.
(3) Stock-Based
Compensation
The employees of the Company participated in the stock-based
compensation plans of Sara Lee prior to the Companys spin
off on September 5, 2006. As a result of the spin off and
consistent with the terms of the awards under Sara Lees
plans, the outstanding Sara Lee stock options granted will
generally expire six months after the spin off date. In
connection with the spin off, vesting for all nonvested
service-based Sara Lee RSUs was accelerated to the spin off date
resulting in the recognition of $5,447 of additional
compensation expense for the quarter ended September 30,
2006. Certain performance-based Sara Lee RSUs remain unvested
through the spin off date.
The Company established the Hanesbrands Inc. Omnibus Incentive
Plan of 2006, the (Hanesbrands OIP) to award stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
stock units, deferred stock units, performance shares and cash
to its employees, non-employee directors and employees of its
subsidiaries to promote the interests of the Company and incent
performance and retention of employees.
On September 26, 2006, a number of awards were made to
employees and non-employee directors under the Hanesbrands OIP.
Two categories of these awards are intended to replace award
values that employees would have received under Sara Lee
incentive plans before the spin off. Three other categories of
these awards were for awards to attract and retain certain
employees, including the Companys 2006 annual awards.
Stock
Options
The exercise price of each stock option equals the market price
of Hanesbrands stock on the date of grant. Options can
generally be exercised over a term of between five and seven
years. Options vest ratably over two to three years with the
exception of one category of award which vested immediately upon
grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using
the following weighted average assumptions: weighted average
expected volatility of 30%; weighted average expected term of
3.7 years; expected dividend yield of 0%; and risk-free
interest rate ranging from 4.52% to 4.59%, with a weighted
average of 4.55%.
7
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
The Company uses the volatility of peer companies for a period
of time that is comparable to the expected life of the option to
determine volatility assumptions. The Company utilized the
simplified method outlined in SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 to estimate expected lives for
options granted during the period.
A summary of the changes in stock options outstanding to the
Companys employees under the Hanesbrands OIP during the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
July 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
22.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
$
|
22.37
|
|
|
$
|
19,350
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
$
|
22.37
|
|
|
$
|
5,941
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 1,123 options that vested during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, the
Company had unrecognized compensation expense related to stock
option awards of $13,320. The weighted average fair value of
individual options granted during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 was $6.55.
Stock
Unit Awards
Restricted stock units (RSUs) of Hanesbrands stock are
granted to certain Company employees and non-employee directors
to incent performance and retention over periods ranging from
one to three years. Upon the achievement of defined goals, the
RSUs are converted into shares of the Companys common
stock on a
one-for-one
basis and issued to the grantees. All RSUs vest solely upon
continued future service to the Company. The cost of these
awards is determined using the fair value of the shares on the
date of grant, and compensation expense is recognized over the
period during which the grantees provide the requisite service
to the Company. A summary of the changes in the restricted stock
unit awards outstanding under the Hanesbrands OIP during the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Nonvested share units at
July 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
22.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested share units at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
22.37
|
|
|
$
|
34,508
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable share units at
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2006, the Company had unrecognized
compensation expense related to stock unit awards of $34,284.
8
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
For all share-based payments under the Hanesbrands OIP, during
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 the Company recognized
total compensation expense of $314 and recognized a tax benefit
of $122. The Company satisfies the requirement for common shares
for share-based payments to employees by issuing newly
authorized shares.
(4) Restructuring
The reported results for the quarters ended September 30,
2006 and October 1, 2005 reflect amounts that have been
recognized for restructuring actions. Reported amounts also
include the impact of certain activities that were completed for
amounts more favorable than previously estimated. The following
is a summary of the expense (income) associated with these
actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Restructuring programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Restructuring actions
|
|
$
|
13,706
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2005 Restructuring actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
2004 Restructuring actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in income
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
13,706
|
|
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates where the costs (income)
associated with these actions are recognized in the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
4,393
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in income
before income taxes
|
|
$
|
13,706
|
|
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following provides a detailed description of the 2007
restructuring actions impacting the reported results for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006.
2007
Restructuring Actions
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company in
connection with its plan to migrate portions of its
manufacturing operations to lower-cost locations approved an
action to close three of its facilities, consisting of two
domestic plants and one international plant. This action is
expected to be completed within a
12-month
period after being approved. The net impact of these actions was
to reduce profit before taxes by $13,706.
|
|
|
|
|
$9,313 of the net charge represents costs associated with the
planned termination of 2,275 employees for employee termination
and other benefits in accordance with benefit plans previously
communicated to the affected employee group. This charge is
reflected in the Restructuring line of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Statement of Income. As of
September 30, 2006, 24 employees had been terminated and
the severance obligation remaining in accrued liabilities on the
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet was $9,118.
|
9
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
$4,393 of the net charge represents accelerated depreciation of
buildings and equipment. This charge is reflected in the
Cost of Sales line of the Condensed Combined and
Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
The following table summarizes the charges taken for the
restructuring activities approved during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 and the related status as of
September 30, 2006. Any accrued amounts remaining as of the
end of September 30, 2006 represent those cash expenditures
necessary to satisfy remaining obligations, which will be
primarily paid in the next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Costs
|
|
|
Non-Cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Employee termination and other
benefits
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,118
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,706
|
|
|
$
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes activity in accrued restructuring
for each of the prior periods restructuring actions from
July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006. Any accrued
amounts remaining at the end of September 30, 2006
represent those cash expenditures necessary to satisfy remaining
obligations, which will be primarily paid in the next two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006 Restructuring actions
|
|
$
|
3,394
|
|
|
$
|
(626
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,768
|
|
2005 Restructuring actions
|
|
|
16,514
|
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
12,114
|
|
2004 Restructuring actions
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
Business Reshaping
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
$
|
21,938
|
|
|
$
|
(5,173
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Income
Taxes
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, income taxes have
been computed consistent with the Companys interim period
tax expense according to Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting
(APB 28) and Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 18, Accounting for Income Taxes in
Interim Periods an Interpretation of APB Opinion
No. 28 (FIN 18). For the period July 2,
2006 through the spin off on September 5, 2006, the
Companys operations were included in the consolidated
income tax returns of Sara Lee. However, income taxes were
calculated and provided for by the Company on a separate return
basis for the entire quarter. Since Sara Lee will retain
liabilities related to income taxes prior to the spin off on
September 5, 2006, such amounts have been reflected in the
Parent companies equity investment line of the
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As of the spin off on September 5, 2006, the Company
recorded certain deferred income taxes on temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and their tax basis. These deferred
income taxes were transferred to the Company from Sara Lee
through the Parent companies equity investment
line of the Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets
and were primarily related to pension and other employee benefit
liabilities assumed as of September 5, 2006 and the
contribution by Sara Lee of an intellectual property subsidiary
that holds certain of the Companys trademarks.
10
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
The difference in the effective tax rate of 34.0% for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 and the
U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to
foreign earnings taxed at less than the U.S. statutory rate
offset by state taxes and nondeductible items.
The difference in the effective tax rate of 17.2% for the
quarter ended October 1, 2005 and the U.S. statutory
rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to unremitted earnings
from foreign subsidiaries taxed at less than U.S. statutory
rate and tax incentives for manufacturing in Puerto Rico.
(6) Comprehensive
Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, requires
that all components of comprehensive income, including net
income, be reported in the financial statements in the period in
which they are recognized. Comprehensive income is defined as
the change in equity during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Net income and
other comprehensive income, including foreign currency
translation adjustments, minimum pension liabilities and
unrealized gains and losses on qualifying cash flow hedges,
shall be reported, net of their related tax effect, to arrive at
comprehensive income. The Companys comprehensive income is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,345
|
|
|
$
|
82,604
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(4,338
|
)
|
|
|
6,016
|
|
Net unrealized loss on qualifying
cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
45,510
|
|
|
$
|
87,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the spin off on September 5, 2006, the
Company assumed obligations relating to the Companys
current and former employees included within Sara Lee sponsored
pension and retirement plans, including $53,813 of additional
minimum pension liability that has not been reflected in
comprehensive income for the quarter ended September 30,
2006.
(7) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
106,931
|
|
|
$
|
104,728
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
195,309
|
|
|
|
196,170
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
960,721
|
|
|
|
935,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,262,961
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
Prior to the spin off from Sara Lee on September 5, 2006,
employees who met certain eligibility requirements participated
in defined benefit pension plans sponsored by Sara Lee. These
defined benefit pension plans included employees from a number
of domestic Sara Lee business units. All obligations pursuant to
these plans have historically been obligations of Sara Lee and
as such, were not included on the Companys historical
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets, prior to
September 5, 2006. The
11
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
annual cost of the Sara Lee defined benefit plans was allocated
to all of the participating businesses based upon a specific
actuarial computation which was followed consistently. In
addition to participation in the Sara Lee sponsored plans, the
Company sponsors two noncontributory defined benefit plans, the
Playtex Apparel, Inc. Pension Plan (the Playtex
Plan) and the National Textiles LLC Pension Plan (the
National Textiles Plan), for certain qualifying
individuals.
In connection with the spin off on September 5, 2006, the
Company assumed Sara Lees obligations under the Sara Lee
Corporation Consolidated Pension and Retirement Plan, the Sara
Lee Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the Sara Lee Canada
Pension Plans and certain other plans that related to the
Companys current and former employees. The obligations and
costs related to all of these plans, in addition to those
obligations and costs related to the Playtex Plan and the
National Textiles Plan, are included in the Companys
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements as of
September 30, 2006.
The pension expense incurred by the Company for these defined
benefit plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation in Sara Lee
sponsored defined benefit plans
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
$
|
13,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanesbrands sponsored defined
benefit plans(1)
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playtex Apparel, Inc. Pension Plan
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
National Textiles LLC Pension Plan
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension plan expense
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
13,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the pension plan expense for the period from
September 5, 2006 through September 30, 2006. |
At September 30, 2006, the Company reported a liability of
$223,453 in the Other noncurrent liabilities line of
the Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet which included the
additional minimum liability of $53,813, net of taxes of
$34,261. The amount of assets and liabilities assumed from Sara
Lee are based on allocations that are subject to final
adjustment.
Measurement
Date and Assumptions
Historically, a March 31 measurement date was used to value
plan assets and obligations for the Companys defined
benefit pension plans. In connection with the spin off on
September 5, 2006, a measurement date of September 5,
2006 was used to value plan assets and obligations reported for
the Hanesbrands Inc. Pension and Retirement Plan, the
Hanesbrands Inc. Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan and two
Canadian defined benefit pension plans. The weighted average
actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net periodic benefit
cost and plan obligations for these plans at the measurement
date were as follows: discount rate for net periodic benefit
cost of 5.89%; a long-term rate of return on plan assets of
7.59%; a rate of compensation increase of 3.90%; and a discount
rate for plan obligations of 5.89%.
(9) Postretirement
Healthcare and Life Insurance Plans
Prior to the spin off from Sara Lee on September 5, 2006,
employees who met certain eligibility requirements participated
in post-retirement healthcare and life insurance sponsored by
Sara Lee. These plans included employees from a number of
domestic Sara Lee business units. All obligations pursuant to
these plans have historically been obligations of Sara Lee and
as such, were not included on the Companys historical
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheets, prior to
September 5, 2006. The annual cost
12
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
of the Sara Lee defined benefit plans was allocated to all of
the participating businesses based upon a specific actuarial
computation which was followed consistently.
In connection with the spin off on September 5, 2006, the
Company assumed Sara Lees obligations under the Sara Lee
postretirement plans. The obligations and costs related to all
of these plans are included in the Companys Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements as of
September 30, 2006.
The postretirement plan expense incurred by the Company for
these postretirement plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Participation in Sara Lee
sponsored postretirement health care and life insurance plans
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
Participation in Hanesbrands
sponsored postretirement health care and life insurance plans(1)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the postretirement benefit expense for the period
from September 5, 2006 through September 30, 2006. |
At September 30, 2006 the Company reported a liability of
$74,111 in the Other noncurrent liabilities line of
the Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Measurement
Date and Assumptions
Historically, a March 31 measurement date was used to value
plan assets and obligations for the Companys defined
benefit pension plans. In connection with the spin off on
September 5, 2006, a measurement date of September 5,
2006 was used to value plan assets and obligations reported for
the postretirement healthcare and life insurance plans. The
weighted average actuarial assumptions used in measuring the net
periodic benefit cost and plan obligations for these plans at
the measurement date were as follows: discount rate of 5.82% for
plan obligations and net periodic benefit cost; and long term
rate of return on plan assets of 3.70%.
(10) Long-Term
Debt
In connection with the spin off on September 5, 2006, the
Company entered into a $2,150,000 senior secured credit facility
(the Senior Secured Credit Facility), a $450,000
senior secured second lien credit facility (the Second
Lien Credit Facility) and a $500,000 bridge loan facility
(the Bridge Loan Facility). The outstanding
balances at September 30, 2006 are reported in the
Current portion of long-term debt and
Long-term debt lines of the Condensed Combined and
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The following paragraphs describe
these facilities.
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
The Senior Secured Credit Facility provides for aggregate
borrowings of $2,150,000, consisting of: (i) a $250,000
Term A loan facility (the Term A
Loan Facility); (ii) a $1,400,000 Term B loan
facility (the Term B Loan Facility); and
(iii) a $500,000 revolving loan facility (the
Revolving Loan Facility). The Senior Secured
Credit Facility is guaranteed by substantially all of
Hanesbrands U.S. subsidiaries and is secured by
equity interests in substantially all of Hanesbrands
direct and indirect U.S subsidiaries and 65% of the voting
securities of certain foreign subsidiaries and substantially all
present and future assets of
13
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Hanesbrands and the guarantors. At the Companys option,
borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility may be
maintained from time to time as (a) Base Rate loans, which
shall bear interest at the higher of (i) 1/2 of 1% in
excess of the federal funds rate and (ii) the rate
published in the Wall Street Journal as the prime
rate (or equivalent), in each case in effect from time to
time, plus the applicable margin in effect from time to time
(which is currently 0.75% for the Term A Loan Facility and
the Revolving Loan Facility and 1.25% for the Term B
Loan Facility), or (b) LIBOR based loans, which shall
bear interest at the LIBO Rate (as defined in the Senior Secured
Credit Facility and adjusted for maximum reserves), as
determined by the administrative agent for the respective
interest period plus the applicable margin in effect from time
to time (which is currently 1.75% for the Term A
Loan Facility and the Revolving Loan Facility and 2.25% for
the Term B Loan Facility). The final maturity of the Term A
Loan Facility is September 5, 2012. The Term A
Loan Facility amortizes in an amount per annum equal to the
following: year 1 5.00%; year 2 10.00%;
year 3 15.00%; year 4 20.00%; year
5 25.00%; year 6 25.00%. The final
maturity of the Term B Loan Facility is September 5,
2013. The Term B Loan Facility is payable in equal
quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1% per annum,
with the balance due on the maturity date. The final maturity of
the Revolving Loan Facility is September 5, 2011. As
of September 30, 2006, the Company had $0 outstanding under
the Revolving Loan Facility and approximately $460,000 of
borrowing availability. At September 30, 2006, the interest
rates on the Term A Loan Facility and the Term B
Loan Facility were 7.13% and 7.63% respectively.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility requires the Company to
comply with customary affirmative and negative covenants and,
commencing with the first fiscal quarter ending after
December 15, 2006, financial covenants, and includes
customary events of default.
Second
Lien Credit Facility
The Second Lien Credit Facility provides for aggregate
borrowings of $450,000 by Hanesbrands wholly-owned
subsidiary, HBI Branded Apparel Limited, Inc. The Second Lien
Credit Facility is unconditionally guaranteed by Hanesbrands and
each entity guaranteeing the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The
Second Lien Credit Facility and the guarantees in respect
thereof are secured on a second-priority basis (subordinate only
to the Senior Secured Credit Facility and any permitted
additions thereto or refinancings thereof) by substantially all
of the assets that secure the Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Loans under the Second Lien Credit Facility bear interest in the
same manner as those under the Senior Secured Credit Facility,
subject to a margin of 2.75% for Base Rate loans and 3.75% for
LIBOR based loans. The Second Lien Credit Facility matures on
March 5, 2014 and includes a penalty for prepayment of the
loan prior to September 5, 2009. The Second Lien Credit
Facility will not amortize and will be repaid in full on its
maturity date. At September 30, 2006 the interest rate on
the Second Lien Credit Facility was 9.13%. The Second Lien
Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with customary
affirmative and negative covenants and, commencing with the
first fiscal quarter ending after December 15, 2006,
financial covenants, and includes customary events of default.
Bridge
Loan Facility
The Bridge Loan Facility provides for a borrowing of
$500,000 and is unconditionally guaranteed by each entity
guaranteeing the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Bridge
Loan Facility is unsecured and matures on September 5,
2007. Interest under the Bridge Loan Facility shall be paid
at a rate of 9.6475%, increasing by .50% per annum on the
third, sixth and ninth month anniversaries of September 5,
2006, not to exceed 11.50% per annum. At September 30,
2006, the interest rate on the Bridge Loan Facility was 9.65%.
The Bridge Loan Facility requires the Company to comply
with customary affirmative and negative covenants, and
commencing with the first fiscal quarter ending after
December 15, 2006, financial covenants, and includes
customary events of default.
14
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Other
Financing Agreements
On January 27, 2006, the Company entered into a RMB
30 million short-term revolving facility arrangement with a
Chinese branch of a U.S. bank that was increased in July
2006 to RMB 50 million ($6,350) Borrowings under the
facility accrue interest at the prevailing base lending rates
published by the Peoples Bank of China less 10%. As of
September 30, 2006, the Company had $4,751 outstanding
under the short-term revolving facility and $1,600 of borrowing
availability. At September 30, 2006, the interest rate on
this facility was 4.69%. The Company was in compliance with the
covenants contained in this facility at September 30, 2006.
Future principal payments for all of the facilities described
above are as follows: $24,626 due in the next nine months,
$35,875 due in 10 to 22 months, $48,375 due in 23 to
35 months, $60,875 due in 36 to 48 months, $73,375 due
in 49 to 61 months and $2,361,625 thereafter.
(11) Business
Segment Information
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company
changed its internal organizational structure such that
operations are managed and reported in five operating segments,
each of which is a reportable segment: Innerwear, Outerwear,
Hosiery, International and Other. These segments are organized
principally by product category and geographic location.
Management of each segment is responsible for the assets and
operations of these businesses.
The types of products and services from which each reportable
segment derives its revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear sells basic branded products that are replenishment in
nature under the product categories of womens intimate
apparel, mens underwear, kids underwear, sleepwear
and socks.
|
|
|
|
Outerwear sells basic branded products that are seasonal in
nature under the product categories of casualwear and activewear.
|
|
|
|
Hosiery sells products in categories such as panty hose and knee
highs.
|
|
|
|
International relates to the Asia, Canada and Latin America
geographic locations which sell products that span across the
innerwear, outerwear and hosiery reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
Other is comprised of sales of non-finished products such as
fabric and certain other materials in order to maintain asset
utilization at certain manufacturing facilities.
|
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with
those described in note 3 to the Companys combined
and consolidated financial statements included in the its Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006. Beginning in the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company began
evaluating the operating performance of its segments based upon
segment operating profit, which is defined as operating profit
before general corporate expenses, amortization of trademarks
and other identifiable intangibles and restructuring and related
accelerated depreciation charges. Previously, the Company
evaluated segment operating performance based upon segment
operating profit which included restructuring and related
charges. Additionally, as of September 30, 2006, the
Company no longer allocates goodwill and trademarks and other
identifiable intangible assets to its operating segments for the
purposes of evaluating operating performance.
15
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Prior year segment results have been restated to conform to the
new measurements of segment financial performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net
sales (1) (2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
651,183
|
|
|
$
|
662,387
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
318,320
|
|
|
|
305,117
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
56,707
|
|
|
|
67,361
|
|
International
|
|
|
93,126
|
|
|
|
92,153
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,796
|
|
|
|
22,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net segment sales
|
|
|
1,130,132
|
|
|
|
1,149,603
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
(11,164
|
)
|
|
|
(11,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,118,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Segment operating
profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
93,204
|
|
|
$
|
76,844
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
25,287
|
|
|
|
25,528
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
9,590
|
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
International
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
Other
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit
|
|
|
134,094
|
|
|
|
116,932
|
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
(24,829
|
)
|
|
|
(11,251
|
)
|
Amortization of trademarks and
other identifiable intangibles
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,089
|
)
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(9,313
|
)
|
|
|
228
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
|
93,892
|
|
|
|
103,820
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(17,569
|
)
|
|
|
(4,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
76,323
|
|
|
$
|
99,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
1,376,142
|
|
|
$
|
2,654,294
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
832,384
|
|
|
|
798,289
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
118,978
|
|
|
|
153,261
|
|
International
|
|
|
311,519
|
|
|
|
298,698
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,600
|
|
|
|
43,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,660,623
|
|
|
|
3,947,909
|
|
Corporate(3)
|
|
|
940,580
|
|
|
|
943,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,601,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,891,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for fixed
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
11,215
|
|
|
$
|
11,519
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
3,633
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
3,438
|
|
International
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
|
|
19,913
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
6,742
|
|
|
|
3,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation expense for
fixed assets
|
|
$
|
27,906
|
|
|
$
|
23,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Additions to long-lived
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
8,939
|
|
|
$
|
3,621
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
|
|
6,163
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
International
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Other
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total additions to long-lived
assets
|
|
$
|
20,181
|
|
|
$
|
19,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes sales between segments. Such sales are at transfer
prices that are at cost plus markup or at prices equivalent to
market value. |
|
(2) |
|
Intersegment sales included in the segments net sales are
as follows: |
17
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
October 1,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,496
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
4,845
|
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
International
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,164
|
|
|
$
|
11,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Principally cash and equivalents, certain fixed assets, deferred
tax assets, goodwill, trademarks and other intangibles, and
certain other noncurrent assets. |
(12) Relationship
with Sara Lee and Related Entities
Effective upon the completion of the spin off, Sara Lee ceased
to be a related party to the Company. The Company paid a
dividend to Sara Lee of $1,950,000 and repaid a loan in the
amount of $450,000 which is reflected in the Condensed Combined
and Consolidated Statement of Stockholders or Parent
Companies Equity. An additional payment of approximately
$26,306 will be paid to Sara Lee in order to satisfy all
outstanding payables from the Company to Sara Lee and Sara Lee
subsidiaries. The $26,306 is outstanding as of
September 30, 2006 and is reported in the Due to Sara
Lee Corporation line of the Condensed Combined and
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Historically, the Company participated in a number of Sara Lee
administered programs such as cash funding systems, insurance
programs, employee benefit programs and workers
compensation programs. In connection with the spin off from Sara
Lee, the Company assumed $299,000 in unfunded employee benefit
liabilities for pension, postretirement and other retirement
benefit qualified and nonqualified plans, and $37,554 of
liabilities in connection with property insurance, workers
compensation, and other programs. These amounts are reflected in
the Accrued liabilities and other and Other
noncurrent liabilities lines of the Condensed Combined and
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Included in the historical information are costs of certain
services such as business insurance, medical insurance, and
employee benefit plans and allocations for certain centralized
administration costs for treasury, real estate, accounting,
auditing, tax, risk management, human resources and benefits
administration. Centralized administration costs were allocated
to the Company based upon a proportional cost allocation method.
These allocated costs are included in the Selling, general
and administrative expenses line of the Combined and
Consolidated Statement of Income and the Parent
companies equity investment line of the Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet. For the quarters ended
September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, the total
amount allocated for centralized administration costs by Sara
Lee was $0 and $8,100. For the quarter ended September 30,
2006, there were no costs allocated as the Companys
infrastructure was in place and did not significantly benefit
from these services from Sara Lee.
In connection with the spin off, the Company entered into the
following agreements with Sara Lee:
|
|
|
|
|
Master Separation Agreement. This agreement
governs the contribution of Sara Lees branded apparel
Americas/Asia business to the Company, the subsequent
distribution of shares of Hanesbrands common stock to Sara
Lee stockholders and other matters related to Sara Lees
relationship with the Company. To effect the contribution, Sara
Lee agreed to transfer all of the assets of the branded apparel
Americas/Asia business to the Company and the Company agreed to
assume, perform and fulfill all of the
|
18
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities of the branded apparel Americas/Asia division in
accordance with their respective terms, except for certain
liabilities to be retained by Sara Lee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Sharing Agreement. This agreement governs
the allocation of U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign
tax liability between the Company and Sara Lee, provides for
restrictions and indemnities in connection with the tax
treatment of the distribution, and addresses other tax-related
matters. This agreement also provides that the Company is liable
for taxes incurred by Sara Lee that arise as a result of the
Company taking or failing to take certain actions that result in
the distribution failing to meet the requirements of a tax-free
distribution under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The Company therefore has generally
agreed that, among other things, it will not take any actions
that would result in any tax being imposed on the spin off.
|
|
|
|
Employee Matters Agreement. This agreement
allocates responsibility for employee benefit matters on the
date of and after the spin off, including the treatment of
existing welfare benefit plans, savings plans, equity-based
plans and deferred compensation plans as well as the
Companys establishment of new plans.
|
|
|
|
Master Transition Services Agreement. Under
this agreement, the Company and Sara Lee agreed to provide each
other, for varying periods of time, with specified support
services related to among others, human resources and financial
shared services, tax-shared services and information technology
services. Each of these services is provided for a fee, which
differs depending upon the service.
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Matters Agreement. This agreement
governs the manner in which Sara Lee will transfer to or share
with the Company various leased and owned properties associated
with the branded apparel business.
|
|
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters
Agreement. This agreement provides general
indemnification provisions pursuant to which the Company and
Sara Lee have agreed to indemnify each other and their
respective affiliates, agents, successors and assigns from
certain liabilities. This agreement also contains provisions
governing the recovery by and payment to the Company of
insurance proceeds related to its business and arising on or
prior to the date of the distribution and its insurance coverage.
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property Matters Agreement. This
agreement provides for the license by Sara Lee to the Company of
certain software, and governs the wind-down of the
Companys use of certain of Sara Lees trademarks
(other than those being transferred to the Company in connection
with the spin off).
|
(13) Issued
But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN No. 48).
This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an entitys financial statements
in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN No. 48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement principles
for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. This
interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing the
impact the adoption of FIN No. 48 will have on its
results of operations and financial position.
Fair
Value Measurements
The FASB has issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which provides guidance for using
fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also
responds to investors requests for more
19
HANESBRANDS
Notes to
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
information about (1) the extent to which companies measure
assets and liabilities at fair value, (2) the information
used to measure fair value, and (3) the effect that
fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 will
apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not
expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances.
SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, of SFAS 157 on its results
of operations and financial position.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R) (SFAS 158).
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement
of financial position an asset for a plans over funded
status or a liability for a plans under funded status,
measure a plans assets and its obligations that determine
its funded status as of the end of the employers fiscal
year (with limited exceptions), and recognize changes in the
funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the
year in which the changes occur. Those changes will be reported
in comprehensive income and as a separate component of
stockholders equity. The requirement to recognize the
funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements
are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after
December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets
and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact of
SFAS 158 on its results of operations and financial
condition.
(14) Subsequent
Events
On October 26, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
voted unanimously to change the fiscal year end of the Company
from the Saturday closest to June 30 to the Saturday
closest to December 31. The transition period that will
result from this change will be from July 2, 2006 until
December 30, 2006.
20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Please see Forward-Looking Statements for a
discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions
associated with these statements. This discussion should be read
in conjunction with our historical financial statements and
related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
The unaudited condensed combined and consolidated financial
statements and notes included herein should be read in
conjunction with our audited combined and consolidated financial
statements and notes for the fiscal year ended July 1,
2006, which were included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results
of operations for the periods reflected herein are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for
future periods, and our actual results may differ materially
from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors, including but not limited to those
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and those included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a consumer goods company with a portfolio of leading
apparel brands, including Hanes, Champion,
Playtex, Bali, Just My Size, barely
there and Wonderbra. We design, manufacture, source
and sell a broad range of apparel essentials such as t-shirts,
bras, panties, mens underwear, kids underwear,
socks, hosiery, casualwear and activewear. Our brands hold
either the number one or number two U.S. market position by
sales in most product categories in which we compete.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we changed our
internal organizational structure such that operations are
managed and reported in five operating segments, each of which
is a reportable segment: innerwear, outerwear, hosiery,
international and other. These segments are organized
principally by product category and geographic location.
Management of each segment is responsible for the assets and
operations of these businesses. Beginning in the quarter ended
September 30, 2006, we began evaluating the operating
performance of our segments based upon segment operating profit,
which is defined as operating profit before general corporate
expenses, amortization of trademarks and other identifiable
intangibles and restructuring and related accelerated
depreciation charges. Previously, we evaluated segment operating
performance based upon segment operating profit which included
restructuring and related charges.
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear. The innerwear segment focuses on
core apparel essentials, and consists of products such as
womens intimate apparel, mens underwear, kids
underwear, socks, thermals and sleepwear, marketed under
well-known brands that are trusted by consumers. We are an
intimate apparel category leader in the United States with our
Hanes, Playtex, Bali, barely there,
Just My Size, and Wonderbra brands. We are also a
leading manufacturer and marketer of mens underwear, and
kids underwear under the Hanes and Champion
brand names. Our net sales for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 from our innerwear segment were
$651 million, representing approximately 58% of net segment
sales.
|
|
|
|
Outerwear. We are a leader in the casualwear
and activewear markets through our Hanes, Champion
and Just My Size brands, where we offer products such
as t-shirts and fleece. Our casualwear lines offer a range of
quality, comfortable clothing for men, women and children
marketed under the Hanes and Just My Size brands.
The Just My Size brand offers casual apparel designed
exclusively to meet the needs of plus-size women. In addition to
activewear for men and women, Champion provides uniforms
for athletic programs and in 2004 launched a new apparel program
at Target, C9 by Champion. We also license our
Champion name for collegiate apparel and footwear. We
also supply our t-shirts, sportshirts and fleece products to
screenprinters and embellishers, who imprint or embroider the
product and then resell to specialty retailers and organizations
such as resorts and professional sports clubs. Our net sales for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from our outerwear
segment were $318 million, representing approximately 28%
of net segment sales.
|
|
|
|
Hosiery. We are the leading marketer of
womens sheer hosiery in the United States. We compete in
the hosiery market by striving to offer superior values and
executing integrated marketing activities, as well as focusing
on the style of our hosiery products. We market hosiery products
under our Hanes,
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Leggs and Just My Size brands. Our net sales
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from our hosiery
segment were $57 million, representing approximately 5% of
net segment sales. Consistent with a sustained decline in the
hosiery industry due to changes in consumer preferences, our net
sales from hosiery sales have declined each year since 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
International. Our net segment sales for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 in our international
segment were $93 million, representing approximately 8% of
net segment sales and include sales in Asia, Canada and Latin
America. Japan, Canada and Mexico are our largest international
markets and we also have opened sales offices in India and China.
|
|
|
|
Other. Our net sales for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 in our other segment were
$11 million, representing approximately 1% of net segment
sales and include sales of non-finished products such as fabric
and certain other materials in the United States, Asia and Latin
America.
|
Spin off
from Sara Lee Corporation
On September 5, 2006, we were spun off from Sara Lee in a
pro rata dividend of all of our outstanding common stock to Sara
Lee stockholders. Prior to completing the spin off, Sara Lee
received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service to the effect that the spin off will qualify as a
tax-free distribution under Section 355 and a tax-free
reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal
Revenue Code. As a condition to the spin off, on
September 5, 2006 we distributed to Sara Lee a cash
dividend payment of $1.95 billion and repaid a loan from
Sara Lee in the amount of $450 million. As a result of the
spin off, Sara Lee ceased to own any equity interest in our
company and we became an independent, separately traded,
publicly held company. In this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
we describe the businesses contributed to us by Sara Lee in the
spin off as if the contributed businesses were our business for
all historical periods described. References in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
to our historical assets, liabilities, products, businesses or
activities of our business are generally intended to refer to
the historical assets, liabilities, products, businesses or
activities of the contributed businesses as the businesses were
conducted as part of Sara Lee and its subsidiaries prior to the
spin off.
Highlights
from the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales of $1.12 billion were down by 1.7% from
$1.14 billion in the quarter ended October 1, 2005.
Discontinuance of low-margin product lines and lower sales of
sheer hosiery primarily accounted for the decrease.
|
|
|
|
Operating profit decreased by 9.6% to $93.9 million from
$103.8 million in the quarter ended October 1, 2005.
The operating profit decline in the current quarter primarily
reflected expenses associated with operating as an independent
company, nonrecurring spin off and related costs, and
restructuring and related charges for plant closures.
|
|
|
|
Net income was $50.3 million, down 39.1% from
$82.6 million in the quarter ended October 1, 2005.
The decrease in net income primarily reflects increased interest
expense, reduced operating profit and a higher income tax rate.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net increased in the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 to $17.6 million from
$4.1 million in the quarter ended October 1, 2005. The
increase is a result of higher debt incurred
31/2 weeks
before the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as a
result of the spin off from Sara Lee. Long-term debt at the end
of the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was
$2.6 billion.
|
|
|
|
The income tax rate for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 was 34.0%, up from 17.2% in the quarter ended
October 1, 2005 as a result of our independent tax
structure.
|
|
|
|
The spin off from Sara Lee was completed on September 5,
2006. In connection with the spin off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We incurred indebtedness of $2.6 billion pursuant to a new
$2.15 billion senior secured credit facility (which
includes a $500 million revolving facility that was undrawn
at the time of the spin off), a $450 million senior secured
second lien credit facility and a $500 million bridge loan
facility.
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
We paid a dividend of $1.95 billion to Sara Lee and repaid
a loan to Sara Lee in the amount of $450 million.
|
|
|
|
Sara Lee extinguished all amounts payable to or receivable from
Sara Lee and its related entities.
|
|
|
|
We assumed $299 million in unfunded employee benefit
liabilities for pension, postretirement and other retirement
benefit qualified and nonqualified plans from Sara Lee.
|
|
|
|
We assumed $38 million of liabilities in connection with
property, workers compensation, and other programs from
Sara Lee.
|
|
|
|
Our common stock began regular way trading on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HBI on
September 6, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We granted stock-based compensation awards to employees and
non-employee directors.
|
|
|
|
We announced an action to close two domestic facilities and one
international facility which reduced income before taxes by
$13.7 million.
|
Condensed
Combined and Consolidated Results of Operations
Quarter Ended September 30, 2006 Compared with Quarter
ended October 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,118,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,961
|
|
|
$
|
(18,993
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
753,337
|
|
|
|
768,442
|
|
|
|
(15,105
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
365,631
|
|
|
|
369,519
|
|
|
|
(3,888
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
262,426
|
|
|
|
265,927
|
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
9,313
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
9,541
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
93,892
|
|
|
|
103,820
|
|
|
|
(9,928
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
17,569
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
13,486
|
|
|
|
330.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
76,323
|
|
|
|
99,737
|
|
|
|
(23,414
|
)
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
25,978
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,345
|
|
|
$
|
82,604
|
|
|
$
|
(32,259
|
)
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,118,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,961
|
|
|
$
|
(18,993
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Net sales declined primarily due to the $13 million impact
from the discontinuation of low-margin product lines in the
outerwear segment and an $11 million decline in sheer
hosiery sales. Additionally, the acquisition of National
Textiles LLC in September 2005 caused a $16 million decline
as sales to this business were included in net sales in periods
prior to the acquisition. Partially offsetting this decline were
increased sales of $23 million in activewear. Consistent
with the sustained decline in the hosiery industry, we expect
the trend of declining hosiery sales to continue as a result of
shifts in consumer preferences.
Cost
of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
753,337
|
|
|
$
|
768,442
|
|
|
$
|
(15,105
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
23
Cost of sales declined year over year as a result of the decline
in net sales, manufacturing cost saving initiatives and a
favorable impact from shifting certain production to lower cost
locations. These changes are partially offset by higher cotton
costs, an unfavorable shift in product mix and accelerated
depreciation as a result of our announced plans to close two
facilities in the United States and one in Mexico.
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
365,631
|
|
|
$
|
369,519
|
|
|
$
|
(3,888
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
As a percent of net sales, gross profit percentage increased
from 32.5% for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 to 32.7%
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase in
gross profit percentage was due to manufacturing cost saving
initiatives of $20 million and a $6 million favorable
impact from shifting certain production to lower cost locations.
These changes were partially offset by a $10 million impact
from an unfavorable shift in product mix, higher cotton costs of
$8 million, a $6 million impact from lower
manufacturing volume and $4 million in accelerated
depreciation as a result of our announced plans to close two
facilities in the United States and one in Mexico.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
262,426
|
|
|
$
|
265,927
|
|
|
$
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
SG&A expenses declined due to a $5 million benefit from
prior year restructuring actions, a $4 million reduction in
pension and post-retirement expense, a $3 million decrease
in ongoing share-based compensation expense, a $4 million
decrease in media, advertising and promotion costs and an
$8 million decrease in corporate allocations associated
with Sara Lee ownership. These decreases were partially offset
by $20 million in higher costs primarily associated with
charges incurred related to the spin off and related costs and
costs associated with being an independent company.
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
$
|
9,313
|
|
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,541
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we approved an
action to close two domestic facilities and one international
facility. This action resulted in a charge of $9 million,
representing costs associated with the planned termination of
2,275 employees for employee termination and other benefits in
accordance with benefit plans previously communicated to the
affected employee group. In connection with the restructuring
action, a charge of $4 million for accelerated depreciation
of buildings and equipment is reflected in the Cost of
sales line of the Condensed Combined and Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Operating
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
$
|
93,892
|
|
|
$
|
103,820
|
|
|
$
|
(9,928
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)%
|
Operating profit for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
decreased as compared to the quarter ended October 1, 2005
primarily as a result of expenses associated with operating as
an independent company, nonrecurring spin off and related costs
and restructuring and related charges for facility closures.
These
24
changes were partially offset by manufacturing cost savings
initiatives and benefits from prior year restructuring actions.
Interest
Expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
17,569
|
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
|
$
|
13,486
|
|
|
|
330.3
|
%
|
In connection with the spin off, we incurred $2.6 billion
of debt pursuant to a new senior secured credit facility, a new
senior secured second lien credit facility and a bridge loan
facility, $2.4 billion of the proceeds of which was paid to
Sara Lee. As a result, our net interest expense in the quarter
ended September 30, 2006 was substantially higher than in
the comparable period in fiscal 2005.
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
25,978
|
|
|
$
|
17,133
|
|
|
$
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
%
|
Our effective income tax rate increased from 17.2% for the
quarter ended October 1, 2005 to 34.0% for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006. The increase in our effective tax
rate as an independent company is attributable primarily to the
expiration of tax incentives for manufacturing in Puerto Rico,
which were repealed effective in fiscal 2007, lower unremitted
earnings from foreign subsidiaries in the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 taxed at rates less than the
U.S. statutory rate, state taxes and non-deductible items
related to the spin off.
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
50,345
|
|
|
$
|
82,604
|
|
|
$
|
(32,259
|
)
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)%
|
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was
lower than for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 as a
result of the items discussed above.
25
Operating
Results by Business Segment Quarter Ended
September 30, 2006 Compared with Quarter ended
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
651,183
|
|
|
$
|
662,387
|
|
|
$
|
(11,204
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
318,320
|
|
|
|
305,117
|
|
|
|
13,203
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
56,707
|
|
|
|
67,361
|
|
|
|
(10,654
|
)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
93,126
|
|
|
|
92,153
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,796
|
|
|
|
22,585
|
|
|
|
(11,789
|
)
|
|
|
(52.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net segment sales
|
|
|
1,130,132
|
|
|
|
1,149,603
|
|
|
|
(19,471
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
(11,164
|
)
|
|
|
(11,642
|
)
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,118,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,137,961
|
|
|
$
|
(18,993
|
)
|
|
|
(1. 7
|
)
|
Segment operating
profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
$
|
93,204
|
|
|
$
|
76,844
|
|
|
$
|
16,360
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
Outerwear
|
|
|
25,287
|
|
|
|
25,528
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Hosiery
|
|
|
9,590
|
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
International
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(70.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating profit
|
|
|
134,094
|
|
|
|
116,932
|
|
|
|
17,162
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
Items not included in segment
operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate expenses
|
|
|
(24,829
|
)
|
|
|
(11,251
|
)
|
|
|
(13,578
|
)
|
|
|
(120.7
|
)
|
Amortization of trademarks and
other intangibles
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
(2,089
|
)
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(9,313
|
)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(9,541
|
)
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
|
93,892
|
|
|
|
103,820
|
|
|
|
(9,928
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(17,569
|
)
|
|
|
(4,083
|
)
|
|
|
(13,486
|
)
|
|
|
(330.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
76,323
|
|
|
$
|
99,737
|
|
|
$
|
(23,414
|
)
|
|
|
(23.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
651,183
|
|
|
$
|
662,387
|
|
|
$
|
(11,204
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
93,204
|
|
|
|
76,844
|
|
|
|
16,360
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
Net sales in the innerwear segment decreased primarily due to
$21 million in lower sales of sleepwear and thermals,
kids underwear and mens underwear partially offset
by increased sales of socks of $10 million.
Gross profit percentage in the innerwear segment increased from
36.2% for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 to 37.0% for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, reflecting a positive
impact of $12 million from manufacturing cost savings
initiatives and $7 million from favorable manufacturing
efficiencies. These changes were partially offset by a
$10 million impact from increased product sales incentives
and unfavorable product sales mix and $3 million in higher
cotton costs.
26
The increase in innerwear segment operating profit is primarily
attributable to the increase in gross profit percentage factors
discussed above and a $7 million impact related to lower
allocated media, advertising and promotion and $6 million
lower allocated marketing costs. These changes are partially
offset by a decline in net sales.
Outerwear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
318,320
|
|
|
$
|
305,117
|
|
|
$
|
13,203
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
25,287
|
|
|
|
25,528
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Net sales in the outerwear segment increased primarily due to
$23 million of increased sales of activewear and
$26 million of increased sales of boys fleece. These
changes are partially offset by the $13 million impact of
our exit of certain lower-margin fleece product lines and lower
womens fleece sales of $20 million.
Gross profit percentage in the outerwear segment remained
relatively flat at 21.8% for the quarter ended October 1,
2005 compared to 21.9% for the quarter ended September 30,
2006. This reflects manufacturing cost savings initiatives of
$7 million and a $6 million positive impact from
shifting certain production to lower cost locations. These
changes were partially offset by $6 million of unfavorable
manufacturing variances, a $5 million impact of higher
cotton costs and a $2 million impact from lower pricing and
unfavorable product sales mix.
The slight decrease in outerwear segment operating profit is
primarily attributable to higher allocated media, advertising
and promotion costs of $3 million partially offset by an
increase in net sales.
Hosiery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
56,707
|
|
|
$
|
67,361
|
|
|
$
|
(10,654
|
)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
9,590
|
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Net sales in the hosiery segment decreased primarily due to the
continued decline in the U.S. sheer hosiery consumption. As
compared to the quarter ended October 1, 2005, overall
sales for the hosiery segment declined 16% which is due to a
continued reduction in sales of Leggs to mass
retailers and food and drug stores and declining sales of
Hanes to department stores. Overall the hosiery market
declined 11%. We expect this trend to continue as a result of
shifts in consumer preferences.
Gross profit declined due to the decline in net sales. Segment
operating profit increased slightly due to $5 million in
lower allocated selling, general and administrative costs offset
by the decline in net sales.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
93,126
|
|
|
$
|
92,153
|
|
|
$
|
973
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Net sales in the international segment increased slightly due to
higher sales of t-shirts in Europe and higher sales in our new
markets in China and India, partially offset by lower sales in
Canada and Japan due to a shift in timing of promotional
activity and the launch of fall seasonal products. Changes in
foreign currency exchange rates increased net sales by
$1.3 million.
Gross profit percentage increased from 39.9% for the quarter
ended October 1, 2005 to 41.0% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. The increase resulted primarily from
margin improvements due to a
27
$3 million decrease in charges for slow-moving and obsolete
inventories primarily in Latin America and $1 million from
positive changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These
changes are partially offset by a $3 million impact from
unfavorable manufacturing efficiencies.
The slight increase in international segment operating profit is
primarily attributable to the improvement in gross margin
partially offset by higher allocation of selling, general and
administrative costs of $1 million.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
10,796
|
|
|
$
|
22,585
|
|
|
$
|
(11,789
|
)
|
|
|
(52.2
|
)%
|
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(70.3
|
)
|
Net sales in the other segment decreased primarily due to the
acquisition of National Textiles LLC in September 2005 which
caused a $16 million decline as sales to this business were
previously included in net sales prior to the acquisition. This
decrease was partially offset by additional fabric sales to
third parties by National Textiles subsequent to the acquisition.
Gross margin decreased from 2.5% for the quarter ended
October 1, 2005 to (2.7)% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as a result of unfavorable manufacturing
variances.
The decrease of other segment operating profit is primarily
attributable to the lower sales and gross margin partially
offset by lower allocated selling and administrative costs.
General
Corporate Expenses
General corporate expenses increased primarily due to costs of
operating as an independent company and an increase in spin off
and related costs of $13 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Trends
and Uncertainties Affecting Liquidity
Following the spin off, our capital structure, long-term capital
commitments and sources of liquidity changed significantly from
our historical capital structure, long-term capital commitments
and sources of liquidity. In periods after the spin off, our
primary sources of liquidity will be cash provided from
operating activities and availability under our revolving loan
facility described below. The following has or is expected to
negatively impact liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
we incurred long-term debt in connection with the spin off of
$2.6 billion;
|
|
|
|
we expect to continue to invest in efforts to improve operating
efficiencies and lower costs;
|
|
|
|
we expect to continue to add new manufacturing capacity in
Central America, the Caribbean Basin and Asia;
|
|
|
|
we assumed pension and other benefit obligations from Sara Lee
of $299 million and;
|
|
|
|
we may need to increase the portion of the income of our foreign
subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the United
States, which could significantly increase our income tax
expense.
|
We incurred indebtedness of $2.6 billion in connection with
the spin off as described below. On September 5, 2006, we
paid $2.4 billion of the proceeds from these borrowings to
Sara Lee and, as a result, those proceeds are not available for
our business needs, such as funding working capital or the
expansion of our operations. In addition, in order to service
our substantial debt obligations, we may need to increase the
portion of the income of our foreign subsidiaries that is
expected to be remitted to the United States, which could
significantly increase our income tax expense. We believe that
our cash provided from operating
28
activities, together with our available credit capacity, will
enable us to comply with the terms of our new indebtedness and
meet presently foreseeable financial requirements.
We expect to continue the restructuring efforts that we have
undertaken over the last several years. For example, we recently
announced the closure of two facilities in the United States and
one in Mexico and announced the closure of three distribution
centers in the United States. The implementation of these
efforts, which are designed to improve operating efficiencies
and lower costs, has resulted and is likely to continue to
result in significant costs. As further plans are developed and
approved by management and our board of directors, we expect to
recognize additional restructuring costs to eliminate
duplicative functions within the organization and transition a
significant portion of our manufacturing capacity to lower-cost
locations. We also expect to incur costs associated with the
integration of our information technology systems across our
company.
As we continue to add new manufacturing capacity in Central
America, the Caribbean Basin and Asia, our exposure to events
that could disrupt our foreign supply chain, including political
instability, acts of war or terrorism or other international
events resulting in the disruption of trade, disruptions in
shipping and freight forwarding services, increases in oil
prices, which would increase the cost of shipping, interruptions
in the availability of basic services and infrastructure and
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, is increased.
Disruptions in our foreign supply chain could negatively impact
our liquidity by interrupting production in offshore facilities,
increasing our cost of sales, disrupting merchandise deliveries,
delaying receipt of the products into the United States or
preventing us from sourcing our products at all. Depending on
timing, these events could also result in lost sales,
cancellation charges or excessive markdowns.
We assumed $299 million in unfunded employee benefit
liabilities for pension, postretirement and other retirement
benefit qualified and nonqualified plans from Sara Lee in
connection with the spin off that occurred on September 5,
2006. Because these obligations have historically been
obligations of Sara Lee, no amounts were reflected in our
October 1, 2005 Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The pension obligations we assumed are $225 million
more than the corresponding pension assets we acquired. These
obligations have been reflected in our September 30, 2006
Condensed Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition,
we could be required to make contributions to the pension plans
in excess of our current expectations if financial conditions
change or if the assumptions we have used to calculate our
pension costs and obligations turn out to be inaccurate. A
significant increase in our funding obligations could have a
negative impact on our liquidity.
The exact amount of contributions made to pension plans by us in
any year is dependent upon a number of factors, and historically
included minimum funding requirements in the jurisdictions in
which Sara Lee operates and Sara Lees policy of charging
its operating units for pension costs. In connection with the
spin off which occurred on September 5, 2006, we
established the Hanesbrands Inc. Pension and Retirement Plan,
which assumed the portion of the underfunded liabilities and the
portion of the assets of pension plans sponsored by Sara Lee
that relate to our employees. In addition, we assumed
sponsorship of certain other Sara Lee plans and will continue
sponsorship of the Playtex Apparel Inc. Pension Plan and the
National Textiles, L.L.C. Pension Plan. We are required to make
periodic pension contributions to the assumed plans, the Playtex
Apparel Inc. Pension Plan, the National Textiles, L.L.C. Pension
Plan and the Hanesbrands Inc. Pension and Retirement Plan. The
levels of contribution will differ from historical levels of
contributions to Sara Lee due to a number of factors, including
the funded status of the plans as of the completion of the spin
off, as well as our operation as a stand-alone company,
financing costs, tax positions and jurisdictional funding
requirements. As a result of provisions of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, we may be required, commencing with plan
years beginning after 2007, to make larger contributions to our
pension plans than Sara Lee made with respect to these plans in
past years.
Net
Cash from Operating Activities
Net cash from operating activities decreased to $55 million
in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 from
$176 million in the quarter ended October 1, 2005. The
$121 million decrease was primarily the result of lower
earnings in the business due to higher interest expense and
income taxes and changes in the use of
29
working capital. The net cash from operating activities of
$176 million for the prior year comparable period was
unusually high due to the timing of other working capital
reductions.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased to
$19 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006
from $15 million in the quarter ended October 1, 2005.
The $4 million increase was primarily the result of less
cash received from sales of property and equipment and higher
purchases of property and equipment.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased to
$125 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006
from $798 million in the quarter ended October 1,
2005. The decrease was primarily the result of net transactions
with parent companies and related entities. In connection with
the spin off on September 5, 2006, we incurred indebtedness
of $2.6 billion pursuant to a new $2.15 billion senior
secured credit facility, a $450 million senior secured
second lien credit facility and a $500 million bridge loan
facility. We used proceeds from borrowings under these
facilities to distribute a cash dividend payment to Sara Lee of
$1.95 billion and repay a loan from Sara Lee in the amount
of $450 million. In connection with the incurrence of debt
under the credit facilities, we paid $46 million in debt
issuance costs.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
As of September 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006, cash and
cash equivalents were $209 million and $298 million,
respectively. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2006 was primarily the result of transactions
associated with the spin off. The September 30, 2006
balance will be reduced as we remit approximately
$26 million to Sara Lee to settle accounts as of the spin
off date. The July 1, 2006 balance was also impacted by a
$275 million bank overdraft which was classified as a
current liability. As part of Sara Lee, we participated in Sara
Lees cash pooling arrangements under which positive and
negative cash balances are netted within geographic regions. The
recapitalization undertaken in conjunction with the spin off
resulted in a reduction in cash and cash equivalents. In periods
after the spin off, our primary sources of liquidity will be
cash provided from operating activities and availability under
our revolving loan facility described below.
Credit
Facilities and Notes Payable
In connection with the spin off on September 5, 2006, we
entered into a $2.15 billion senior secured credit facility
(the Senior Secured Credit Facility) which includes
a $500 million revolving loan facility that was undrawn at
the time of the spin off, a $450 million senior secured
second lien credit facility (the Second Lien Credit
Facility) and a $500 million bridge loan facility
(the Bridge Loan Facility) with various
financial institution lenders, including Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Morgan Stanley Senior
Funding, Inc., as the co-syndication agents and the joint lead
arrangers and joint bookrunners. Citicorp USA, Inc. is acting as
administrative agent and Citibank, N.A. is acting as collateral
agent for the Senior Secured Credit Facility and the Second Lien
Credit Facility. Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. is acting
as the administrative agent for the Bridge Loan Facility.
As a result of this debt incurrence, the amount of interest
expense will increase significantly in periods after the spin
off. We paid $2.4 billion of the proceeds of these
borrowings to Sara Lee in connection with the spin off.
30
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
The Senior Secured Credit Facility provides for aggregate
borrowings of $2.15 billion, consisting of: (i) a
$250.0 million Term A loan facility (the Term A
Loan Facility); (ii) a $1.4 billion Term B
loan facility (the Term B Loan Facility); and
(iii) a $500.0 million revolving loan facility (the
Revolving Loan Facility) that was undrawn at
the time of the spin off.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility is guaranteed by
substantially all of our existing and future direct and indirect
U.S. subsidiaries, with certain customary or agreed-upon
exceptions for certain subsidiaries. We and each of the
guarantors under the Senior Secured Credit Facility have granted
the lenders under the Senior Secured Credit Facility a valid and
perfected first priority (subject to certain customary
exceptions) lien and security interest in the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the equity interests of substantially all of our direct and
indirect U.S. subsidiaries and 65% of the voting securities
of certain foreign subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
substantially all present and future property and assets, real
and personal, tangible and intangible, of Hanesbrands Inc. and
each guarantor, except for certain enumerated interests, and all
proceeds and products of such property and assets.
|
The final maturity of the Term A Loan Facility is
September 5, 2012. The Term A Loan Facility will
amortize in an amount per annum equal to the following: year
1 5.00%; year 2 10.00%; year
3 15.00%; year 4 20.00%; year
5 25.00%; year 6 25.00%. The final
maturity of the Term B Loan Facility is September 5,
2013. The Term B Loan Facility will be repaid in equal
quarterly installments in an amount equal to 1% per annum,
with the balance due on the maturity date. The final maturity of
the Revolving Loan Facility is September 5, 2011. All
borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facility must be repaid
in full upon maturity.
At our option, borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility may be maintained from time to time as (a) Base
Rate loans, which shall bear interest at the higher of
(i) 1/2 of 1% in excess of the federal funds rate and
(ii) the rate published in the Wall Street Journal as the
prime rate (or equivalent), in each case in effect
from time to time, plus the applicable margin in effect from
time to time (which is currently 0.75% for the Term A
Loan Facility and the Revolving Loan Facility and
1.25% for the Term B Loan Facility), or (b) LIBOR
based loans, which shall bear interest at the LIBO Rate (as
defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facility and adjusted for
maximum reserves), as determined by the administrative agent for
the respective interest period plus the applicable margin in
effect from time to time (which is currently 1.75% for the Term
A Loan Facility and the Revolving Loan Facility and
2.25% for the Term B Loan Facility).
The Senior Secured Credit Facility requires us to comply with
customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. The
Senior Secured Credit Facility requires that we maintain a
minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum total debt to
earnings before income taxes, depreciation expense and
amortization expense (EBITDA) ratio. The interest
coverage covenant requires that the ratio of our EBITDA for the
preceding four fiscal quarters to our consolidated total
interest expense for such period shall not be less than 2 to 1
for each fiscal quarter ending after December 15, 2006. The
interest coverage ratio will increase over time until it reaches
3.25 to 1 for fiscal quarters ending after October 15,
2009. The total debt to EBITDA covenant requires that the ratio
of our total debt to our EBITDA for the preceding four fiscal
quarters will not be more than 5.5 to 1 for each fiscal quarter
ending after December 15, 2006. This ratio limit will
decline over time until it reaches 3 to 1 for fiscal quarters
after October 15, 2009. The method of calculating all of
the components used in the covenants is included in the Senior
Secured Credit Facility.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of
default, including nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment
of interest, fees or other amounts after stated grace period;
inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of
covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; any
cross-default of more than $50 million; certain judgments
of more than $50 million; certain events related to the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or
ERISA; and a change in control (as defined in the
Senior Secured Credit Facility).
31
Second
Lien Credit Facility
The Second Lien Credit Facility provides for aggregate
borrowings of $450 million by Hanesbrands
wholly-owned subsidiary, HBI Branded Apparel Limited, Inc. The
Second Lien Credit Facility is unconditionally guaranteed by
Hanesbrands and each entity guaranteeing the Senior Secured
Credit Facility, subject to the same exceptions and exclusions
provided in the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Second Lien
Credit Facility and the guarantees in respect thereof are
secured on a second-priority basis (subordinate only to the
Senior Secured Credit Facility and any permitted additions
thereto or refinancings thereof) by substantially all of the
assets that secure the Senior Secured Credit Facility (subject
to the same exceptions).
Loans under the Second Lien Credit Facility will bear interest
in the same manner as those under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility, subject to a margin of 2.75% for Base Rate loans and
3.75% for LIBOR based loans.
The Second Lien Credit Facility requires us to comply with
customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants. The
Second Lien Credit Facility requires that we maintain a minimum
interest coverage ratio and a maximum total debt to EBITDA
ratio. The interest coverage covenant requires that the ratio of
our EBITDA for the preceding four fiscal quarters to our
consolidated total interest expense for such period shall not be
less than 1.5 to 1 for each fiscal quarter ending after
December 15, 2006. The interest coverage ratio will
increase over time until it reaches 2.5 to 1 for fiscal quarters
ending after April 15, 2009. The total debt to EBITDA
covenant requires that the ratio of our total debt to our EBITDA
for the preceding four fiscal quarters will not be more than 6
to 1 for each fiscal quarter ending after December 15,
2006. This ratio will decline over time until it reaches 3.75 to
1 for fiscal quarters ending after October 15, 2009. The
method of calculating all of the components used in the
covenants is included in the Second Lien Credit Facility.
The Second Lien Credit Facility contains customary events of
default, including nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment
of interest, fees or other amounts after stated grace period;
inaccuracy of representations and warranties; violations of
covenants; certain bankruptcies and liquidations; any
cross-default of more than $60 million; certain judgments
of more than $60 million; certain ERISA-related events; and
a change in control (as defined in the Second Lien Credit
Facility).
The Second Lien Credit Facility matures on March 5, 2014
and includes a penalty for prepayment of the loan prior to
September 5, 2009. The Second Lien Credit Facility will not
amortize and will be repaid in full on its maturity date.
Bridge
Loan Facility
The Bridge Loan Facility provides for a borrowing of
$500 million and is unconditionally guaranteed by each
entity guaranteeing the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The
Bridge Loan Facility is unsecured and will mature on
September 5, 2007. If the Bridge Loan Facility has not
been repaid at maturity, the outstanding principal amount of the
facility will roll over into a rollover loan in the same amount
that will mature on September 5, 2014. Lenders that have
extended rollover loans to us may request that we issue
Exchange Notes to them in exchange for the rollover
loans, and also may request that we register such notes under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, upon request.
Interest under the Bridge Loan Facility shall be paid at
the Contract Rate. Contract Rate is defined as of
any date of determination, (i) from the Closing Date to,
but excluding, the three month anniversary of the Closing Date,
a rate of 9.6475%, (ii) on and after the three month
anniversary of the Closing Date to, but excluding, the six month
anniversary of the Closing Date, a rate per annum (the
Second Contract Rate) equal to the sum of the First
Contract Rate plus 0.50%, (iii) on and after the six month
anniversary of the Closing Date to, but excluding, the nine
month anniversary of the Closing Date, a rate per annum (the
Third Contract Rate) equal to the sum of the Second
Contract Rate plus 0.50%, (iv) on and after the nine month
anniversary of the Closing Date to, but excluding, the Bridge
Loan Repayment Date, a rate per annum (the Fourth Contract
Rate) equal to the sum of the Third Contract Rate plus
0.50% and (v) on and after the Bridge Loan Repayment Date,
a rate per annum equal to the sum of the Fourth Contract Rate
plus an increase of 0.50% every three months. However, the
interest rate borne by the Bridge Loan Facility will not exceed
11.50%.
32
The Bridge Loan Facility requires us to comply with
customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants and
includes customary events of default.
Notes
Payable
We have a RMB 50 million ($6.35 million) short-term
revolving facility arrangement with a Chinese branch of a
U.S. bank. The facility is dated January 27, 2006 and
is renewable annually. Borrowings under the facility accrue
interest at the prevailing base lending rates published by the
Peoples Bank of China from time to time less 10%. As of
September 30, 2006, $4.8 million was outstanding under
this facility. We were in compliance with the covenants
contained in this facility at September 30, 2006.
Future
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table contains information on our contractual
obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 3 Years
|
|
|
3 5 Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
19,875
|
|
|
$
|
84,250
|
|
|
$
|
134,250
|
|
|
$
|
2,361,625
|
|
Notes payable to banks
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on debt obligations(2)
|
|
|
1,489,649
|
|
|
|
162,864
|
|
|
|
438,257
|
|
|
|
424,680
|
|
|
|
463,848
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
129,454
|
|
|
|
35,577
|
|
|
|
51,161
|
|
|
|
27,591
|
|
|
|
15,125
|
|
Capital lease obligations
including related interest payments
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(3)
|
|
|
638,746
|
|
|
|
450,285
|
|
|
|
179,386
|
|
|
|
9,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations(4)
|
|
|
36,302
|
|
|
|
20,984
|
|
|
|
8,181
|
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,904,251
|
|
|
$
|
697,093
|
|
|
$
|
763,623
|
|
|
$
|
602,937
|
|
|
$
|
2,840,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with the spin off, we incurred approximately
(i) $1.65 billion of indebtedness under a senior
secured credit facility, which included an additional
$500 million revolving credit facility which was undrawn at
the closing of the spin off, (ii) $450 million of
indebtedness under a senior secured second lien credit facility
and (iii) $500 million of indebtedness under a bridge
loan facility. Each of these credit facilities bear interest as
described in New Credit Facilities above. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest obligations on floating rate debt instruments are
calculated for future periods using interest rates in affect at
September 30, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Purchase obligations, as disclosed in the table, are
obligations to purchase goods and services in the ordinary
course of business for production and inventory needs (such as
raw materials, supplies, packaging, and manufacturing
arrangements), capital expenditures, marketing services,
royalty-bearing license agreement payments and other
professional services. This table only includes purchase
obligations for which we have agreed upon a fixed or minimum
quantity to purchase, a fixed, minimum or variable pricing
arrangement, and an approximate delivery date. Actual cash
expenditures relating to these obligations may vary from the
amounts shown in the table above. We enter into purchase
obligations when terms or conditions are favorable or when a
long-term commitment is necessary. Many of these arrangements
are cancelable after a notice period without a significant
penalty. This table omits obligations that did not exist as of
September 30, 2006, as well as obligations for accounts
payable and accrued liabilities recorded on the balance sheet. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the projected payment for long-term liabilities
recorded on the balance sheet for deferred compensation,
deferred income, and the remaining fiscal 2007 projected pension
contribution of $0.4 million. We have employee benefit
obligations consisting of pensions and other postretirement
benefits including medical. Other than the remaining fiscal 2007
projected pension contribution of $0.4 million, pension and
postretirement obligations have been excluded from the table. A
discussion of our pension and postretirement plans is included
in |
33
|
|
|
|
|
Notes 8 and 9 to our Condensed Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements. Our obligations for employee health and
property and casualty losses are also excluded from the table. |
Significant
Accounting Policies and Critical Estimates
We have chosen accounting policies that we believe are
appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating
results and financial position in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. We apply
these accounting policies in a consistent manner. Our
significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 3,
titled Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
to our Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements included
in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The application of these accounting policies requires that we
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are based on
historical and other factors believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an
ongoing basis and may retain outside consultants to assist in
our evaluation. If actual results ultimately differ from
previous estimates, the revisions are included in results of
operations in the period in which the actual amounts become
known. The accounting policies that involve the most significant
management judgments and estimates used in preparation of our
consolidated financial statements, or are the most sensitive to
change from outside factors, are discussed in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006. There have been no
material changes during the quarter ended September 30,
2006 in these policies except for the following:
Insurance
Reserves
Prior to the spin off on September 5, 2006, we were insured
through Sara Lee for property, workers compensation, and
other casualty programs, subject to minimum claims thresholds.
Sara Lee charged an amount to cover premium costs to each
operating unit. Subsequent to the spin off on September 5,
2006, we maintain our own insurance coverage for these programs.
We are responsible for losses up to certain limits and are
required to estimate a liability that represents the ultimate
exposure for aggregate losses below those limits. This liability
is based on managements estimates of the ultimate costs to
be incurred to settle known claims and claims not reported as of
the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is not
discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and factors,
including historical trends, actuarial assumptions, and economic
conditions. If actual trends differ from the estimates, the
financial results could be impacted.
Income
Taxes
Prior to the spin off on September 5, 2006, all income
taxes were computed and reported on a separate return basis as
if we were not part of Sara Lee. Deferred taxes were recognized
for the future tax effects of temporary differences between
financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for
the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Net
operating loss carry forwards had been determined in our
financial statements as if we were separate from Sara Lee,
resulting in a different net operating loss carry forward amount
than reflected by Sara Lee. Given our continuing losses in
certain geographic locations on a separate return basis, a
valuation reserve had been established for the value of the
deferred tax assets relating to these specific locations.
Federal income taxes are provided on that portion of our income
of foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the
United States and be taxable, reflecting the historical
decisions made by Sara Lee with regards to earnings permanently
reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. In periods after the spin
off, we may make different decisions as to the amount of
earnings permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions, due to
anticipated cash flow or other business requirements, which may
result in a different federal income tax provision.
In conjunction with the spin off, we and Sara Lee entered into a
Tax Sharing Agreement. This agreement allocates responsibilities
between us and Sara Lee for taxes and certain other tax matters.
Under the Tax Sharing Agreement, Sara Lee generally is liable
for all U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income taxes
attributable to us with respect to taxable periods ending on or
before September 5, 2006. Sara Lee also is liable for
income taxes attributable to us with respect to taxable periods
beginning before September 5, 2006 and ending after
September 5, 2006, but only to the extent those taxes are
allocable to the portion of the
34
taxable period ending on September 5, 2006. We are
generally liable for all other taxes attributable to us. Changes
in the amounts payable or receivable by us under the
stipulations of this agreement may impact our tax provision in
any period.
Defined
Benefit Pension and Post Retirement Plans
Prior to the spin off on September 5, 2006, certain
eligible employees of the Company participated in the defined
benefit pension plans and the postretirement health-care and
life insurance plans of Sara Lee. In connection with the spin
off, we assumed approximately $299 million in obligations
under the Sara Lee sponsored pension and post-retirement plans
and the Sara Lee Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan that related to our current and former employees. The
amount of the net liability actually assumed was evaluated in a
manner specified by ERISA and will be finalized and certified by
plan actuaries several months after the completion of the spin
off. Benefits under the pension and postretirement benefit plans
are generally based on age at retirement and years of service
and for some pension plans, benefits are also based on the
employees annual earnings. The net periodic cost of the
pension and post-retirement plans is determined using the
projections and actuarial assumptions, the most significant of
which are the discount rate, the long-term rate of asset return,
and medical trend (rate of growth for medical costs). The net
periodic pension and postretirement income or expense is
recognized in the year incurred. Gains and losses, which occur
when actual experience differs from actuarial assumptions, are
amortized over the average future service period of employees.
Issued
But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: An Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, or
FIN No. 48. This interpretation clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
entitys financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109. FIN No. 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement principles for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions
taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. This
interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. We are currently assessing the impact
the adoption of FIN No. 48 will have on our results of
operations and financial position.
Fair
Value Measurements
The FASB has issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, or
SFAS 157, which provides guidance for using
fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also
responds to investors requests for more information about
(1) the extent to which companies measure assets and
liabilities at fair value, (2) the information used to
measure fair value, and (3) the effect that fair-value
measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 will apply whenever
another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to
be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use
of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the
impact, if any, of SFAS 157 on our results of operations
and financial position.
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R), or SFAS 158.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement
of financial position an asset for a plans over funded
status, or a liability for a plans under funded status,
measure a plans assets and its obligations that determine
its funded status as of the end of the employers fiscal
year (with limited exceptions), and recognize changes in the
funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the
year in which the changes occur. Those changes will be reported
in our comprehensive income and as a separate component of
stockholders equity. The requirement to recognize the
funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements
are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after
December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets
and benefit obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end is
35
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008.
We are evaluating the impact of SFAS 158 on our results of
operations and financial condition.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
There have been no significant changes in our market risk
exposures from those described in Item 7A of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2006.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b),
our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e),
as of as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(d),
our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting occurred during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Although we are subject to various claims and legal actions that
occur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business,
we are not party to any pending legal proceedings that we
believe could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations or financial condition.
No updates to report.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Prior to the spin off, Sara Lee, as our sole shareholder,
approved the following actions. On July 20, 2006, Sara Lee
approved the Hanesbrands Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
the Hanesbrands Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation
Plan. On September 1, 2006, Sara Lee approved Articles of
Amendment and Restatement of our charter, our stockholder rights
plan and Articles Supplementary to our charter creating our
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A. The
Articles of Amendment and Restatement and the Articles
Supplementary were filed and became effective upon filing with
the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on
September 1, 2006.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index on
page E-1
are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HANESBRANDS INC.
E. Lee Wyatt Jr.
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 13, 2006
37
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Amendment and
Restatement of Hanesbrands Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 5, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Articles Supplementary (Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, Series A) (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 5, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Hanesbrands Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 5, 2006).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Richard A. Noll,
Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of E. Lee Wyatt Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of
Richard A. Noll, Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of
E. Lee Wyatt Jr., Chief Financial Officer.
|
E-1