UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32989
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CALIFORNIA | 94-0787340 | |
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2008 – 21st. Street. P.O. Box 832, Bakersfield, California | 93302 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number: | (661) 325-1000 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated Filer ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
(Class) | (Outstanding at November 14, 2012) |
Common Stock Without Par Value | 4,688,085 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2012
Table of Contents
Page | ||
PART I | ||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
Balance Sheets - September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) | ||
and December 31, 2011 | 3 | |
Statements of Operations - | ||
Three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) | 5 | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) | 6 | |
Statements of Cash Flows - | ||
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) | 7 | |
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 9 | |
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 19 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 19 |
PART II | ||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 20 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 20 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 20 |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 20 |
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 20 |
Item 5. | Other Information | 20 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 20 |
2 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,582,642 | $ | 2,762,676 | ||||
Short-term investments | 2,134,391 | 2,128,380 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable (net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $4,000 in 2012 and 2011) | 431,151 | 555,495 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 55,569 | 21,169 | ||||||
Crude oil inventory | 106,025 | 118,156 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 116,140 | 255,846 | ||||||
Deferred Income taxes | 262,500 | 262,500 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 6,688,418 | 6,104,222 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost: | ||||||||
Oil and gas properties and equipment (successful efforts method) | 19,919,006 | 19,124,558 | ||||||
Capitalized asset retirement costs | 409,338 | 401,242 | ||||||
Drilling and operating equipment | 1,966,750 | 1,956,371 | ||||||
Land, buildings and improvements | 1,073,918 | 1,073,918 | ||||||
Automotive, office and other property and equipment | 1,228,147 | 1,192,118 | ||||||
24,597,159 | 23,748,207 | |||||||
Less - accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and valuation allowances | (20,611,051 | ) | (20,091,655 | ) | ||||
TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | 3,986,108 | 3,656,552 | ||||||
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS | ||||||||
Long-term investments | 1,093,919 | 1,071,984 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 608,700 | 781,600 | ||||||
Deposits | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||||||
Other assets | 17,380 | 17,380 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS | 1,969,999 | 2,120,964 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 12,644,525 | $ | 11,881,738 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
3 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 147,763 | $ | 88,494 | ||||
Accrued professional fees | 126,876 | 142,990 | ||||||
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes | 40,203 | 77,471 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and related costs | 62,987 | 51,252 | ||||||
Accrued royalties payable | 206,513 | 224,810 | ||||||
Accrued insurance | 0 | 82,428 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 5,981 | 32,285 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 590,323 | 699,730 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 0 | 22,330 | ||||||
LIABILITY FOR ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS | 1,304,850 | 1,278,889 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITES | 1,895,173 | 2,000,949 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 4) | ||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value Authorized - 10,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding - none | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, no par value (Note 5, 7 and 9) Authorized - 50,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding - 4,688,085 shares and 4,683,853 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 1,682,971 | 1,682,971 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 9,066,381 | 8,197,818 | ||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | 10,749,352 | 9,880,789 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 12,644,525 | $ | 11,881,738 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
4 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Oil and gas sales | $ | 1,198,420 | $ | 1,412,842 | ||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 476,122 | 421,405 | ||||||
General and administrative | 192,910 | 222,583 | ||||||
Stock based compensation | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Taxes, other than income and payroll taxes | 44,885 | 37,399 | ||||||
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization | 151,502 | 184,208 | ||||||
Valuation allowances | 0 | 673,000 | ||||||
Accretion expense | 13,153 | 5,229 | ||||||
Other costs and expenses | 33,975 | 31,280 | ||||||
912,547 | 1,575,104 | |||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | 285,873 | (162,262 | ) | |||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||
Interest income | 10,975 | 12,193 | ||||||
Other income | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Interest expense | (152 | ) | (568 | ) | ||||
10,823 | 11,625 | |||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE | ||||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT) | 296,696 | (150,637 | ) | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | ||||||||
Current | 16,800 | 52,700 | ||||||
Deferred | 72,000 | (207,600 | ) | |||||
88,800 | (154,900 | ) | ||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 207,896 | $ | 4,263 | ||||
BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 4,687,644 | 4,683,853 | ||||||
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding | 4,687,644 | 4,685,177 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Oil and gas sales | $ | 3,907,792 | $ | 4,289,181 | ||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,365,861 | 1,282,950 | ||||||
General and administrative | 632,804 | 666,375 | ||||||
Stock based compensation | 0 | 43,743 | ||||||
Taxes, other than income and payroll taxes | 129,266 | 101,358 | ||||||
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization | 519,396 | 595,631 | ||||||
Valuation allowances | 0 | 727,384 | ||||||
Accretion expense | 31,970 | 26,793 | ||||||
Other costs and expenses | 118,449 | 118,964 | ||||||
2,797,746 | 3,563,198 | |||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 1,110,046 | 725,983 | ||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | ||||||||
Interest income | 31,835 | 38,704 | ||||||
Other income | 250 | 500 | ||||||
Interest expense | (868 | ) | (2,459 | ) | ||||
31,217 | 36,745 | |||||||
INCOME BEFORE | ||||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT) | 1,141,263 | 762,728 | ||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | ||||||||
Current | 99,800 | 163,300 | ||||||
Deferred | 172,900 | (151,500 | ) | |||||
272,700 | 11,800 | |||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 868,563 | $ | 750,928 | ||||
BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.16 | ||||
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.16 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 4,685,117 | 4,682,492 | ||||||
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding | 4,685,117 | 4,688,465 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 868,563 | $ | 750,928 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization | 519,396 | 595,631 | ||||||
Valuation allowances | 0 | 727,384 | ||||||
Gain on sale of fixed assets | 0 | (1,512 | ) | |||||
Stock based compensation | 0 | 43,743 | ||||||
Accretion expense | 31,970 | 26,793 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 172,900 | (151,900 | ) | |||||
Asset retirement obligations | (6,009 | ) | 11,779 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in trade accounts and income tax receivable | 89,944 | (44,150 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in crude oil inventories | 12,131 | (10,336 | ) | |||||
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets | 139,706 | 139,016 | ||||||
(Increase) in other assets | 0 | (10,000 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (83,103 | ) | (127,108 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,745,498 | 1,950,268 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | (848,952 | ) | $ | (1,137,941 | ) | ||
Payments to acquire short-term investments | 0 | (100,000 | ) | |||||
(Increase) in short-term investments | (6,011 | ) | (22,574 | ) | ||||
(Increase) in long-term investments | (21,935 | ) | (9,516 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 0 | 21,500 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (876,898 | ) | (1,248,531 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Loans to employees | 0 | (1,300 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 0 | 55,979 | ||||||
Principal payments from loans to employees | 0 | 900 | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt | (48,634 | ) | (25,842 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (48,634 | ) | 29,737 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 819,966 | 731,474 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 2,762,676 | 1,535,532 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 3,582,642 | $ | 2,267,006 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the nine months for interest | $ | 868 | $ | 2,459 | ||||
Cash paid during the nine months for income taxes | $ | 134,200 | $ | 185,598 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
8 |
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2012
(UNAUDITED)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements include the accounts of Pyramid Oil Company (the “Company”). Such financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is contained in its December 31, 2011 Form 10-K which is incorporated herein by reference. The financial data presented herein should be read in conjunction with the Company's December 31, 2011 financial statements and notes thereto, contained in the Company's Form 10-K.
In the opinion of the Company, the unaudited financial statements, contained herein, include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of September 30, 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.
Income Taxes - When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, California, Texas and New York states. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examination for the years before 2009. State jurisdictions that remain subject to examination range from 2008 to 2011. The Company does not believe there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.
The Company policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of the date of adoption of FASB ASC 740, the Company did not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any interest expense recognized during the quarter.
Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.
Income (Loss) per Share - Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
9 |
Valuation Allowances - The Company has recorded valuation allowances for certain of its oil and gas properties when the undiscounted future net cash flows are less than the net capitalized costs for the property. On March 21, 2011, the Company participated in the drilling of a joint venture well in Menard County, Texas. Log analysis of this well indicated that the well would not be commercially viable, and was plugged and abandoned. The Company owns a 30% interest in the joint venture. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $54,384 against the costs incurred during the first nine months of 2011 for the drilling of this well. There was no valuation allowance recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
In addition, the Company determined that the assets related to its joint venture in the Pike 1-H well may have been impaired because the results of drilling operations there had not fulfilled expectations and has not responded favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from this well. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company determined that well assets of $897,000 were impaired and wrote them down by $673,000 to their estimated fair value. The estimated fair value was based upon estimated future cash flows to be generated by the wells estimated production discounted at a market rate of interest.
Joint Interest Billing Receivable - The Company entered into a joint venture agreement on February 23, 2011 with Victory Oil Company for the drilling of a well on the Company’s Pike lease. The Pike 1-H well was drilled during the first quarter of 2011. The well was completed and placed into production during April 2011. The Company’s share of the total costs for drilling and completing this well are 68% and Victory Oil’s share of costs are 32%. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s share of costs for drilling this well were approximately $897,000 and Victory Oil’s share of the costs were approximately $422,000. At September 30, 2011, the Company has a joint interest billing receivable of $10,776 from Victory Oil for its share of the costs of operating this well. At September 30, 2012, the Company has a joint interest billing receivable of $3,647 from Victory Oil for its share of the costs of operating this well.
2. Dividends
No cash dividends were paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
3. Commitments and Contingencies
In February 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John H. Alexander pursuant to which Mr. Alexander agreed to serve as the Company's Vice President. On June 3, 2004, Mr. Alexander was appointed as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement is for an initial term of six years, which term automatically renews annually if written notice is not tendered. The agreement was automatically renewed on June 3, 2012.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company may terminate Mr. Alexander's employment with or without cause at any time before its term expires upon providing written notice. In the event the Company terminates Mr. Alexander's employment without cause, Mr. Alexander would be entitled to receive a severance amount equal to his annual base salary and benefits for the balance of the term of his employment agreement. In the event of termination by reason of Mr. Alexander's death or permanent disability, his legal representative will be entitled to receive his annual salary and benefits for the remaining term of his employment agreement. In the event of, or termination following, a change in control of the Company, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Alexander would be entitled to receive his annual salary and benefits for the remainder of the term of his agreement. In the event that Mr. Alexander is terminated the Company would incur approximately $870,000 in costs.
The Company has been notified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of a final settlement offer to settle its potential liability as a generator of waste containing hazardous substances that was disposed of at a waste disposal site in Santa Barbara County. The Company has responded to the EPA by indicating that the waste contained petroleum products that fall within the exception to the definition of hazardous substances for petroleum-related substances of the pertinent EPA regulations. Management has concluded that under both Federal and State regulations no reasonable basis exists for any valid claim against the Company. As such, the likelihood of any settlement is deemed remote. There has been not further communication form the EPA on this matter since September 25, 2009.
10 |
4. Income Tax Provision
The Company recognized an income tax provision of $272,700 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and a net income tax provision of $11,800 for the same period in 2011.
Income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was calculated as follows:
Federal | State | Total | ||||||||||
Current tax provision | $ | 85,300 | $ | 14,500 | $ | 99,800 | ||||||
Deferred tax provision | 134,550 | 38,350 | 172,900 | |||||||||
$ | 219,850 | $ | 52,850 | $ | 272,700 |
Income tax provision (benefit) for the nine months September 30, 2011 was calculated as follows:
Federal | State | Total | ||||||||||
Current tax provision | $ | 140,000 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 163,300 | ||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) | (117,800 | ) | (33,700 | ) | (151,500 | ) | ||||||
$ | 22,200 | $ | (10,400 | ) | $ | 11,800 |
Income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was calculated as follows:
Federal | State | Total | ||||||||||
Current tax provision | $ | 14,300 | $ | 2,500 | $ | 16,800 | ||||||
Deferred tax provision | 56,050 | 15,950 | 72,000 | |||||||||
$ | 70,350 | $ | 18,450 | $ | 88,800 |
Income tax provision (benefit) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was calculated as follows:
Federal | State | Total | ||||||||||
Current tax provision | $ | 45,200 | $ | 7,500 | $ | 52,700 | ||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) | (161,600 | ) | (46,000 | ) | (207,600 | ) | ||||||
$ | (116,400 | ) | $ | (38,500 | ) | $ | (154,900 | ) |
Deferred income taxes are recognized using the asset and liability method by applying income tax rates to cumulative temporary differences based on when and how they are expected to affect the tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for income tax rate changes. Deferred income tax assets have been offset by a valuation allowance of $1,719,000 as of September 30, 2012. Management reviews deferred income taxes regularly throughout the year, and accordingly makes any necessary adjustments to properly reflect the valuation allowance based upon current financial trends and projected results.
11 |
5. Incentive and Retention Plan
On January 9, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors adopted an Incentive and Retention Plan pursuant to which the Company's officers and other employees selected by the Company's Compensation Committee are entitled to receive payments if they are employed by the Company as of the date of a 'Corporate Transaction,' as defined in the Incentive and Retention Plan. A 'Corporate Transaction' includes certain mergers involving the Company, sales of Company assets, and other changes in the control of the Company, as specified in the Incentive and Retention Plan. In general, the amount that is payable to each plan participant will equal the number of plan units that have been granted to him or her, multiplied by the increase in the value of the Company between January 9, 2007 and the date of a Corporate Transaction. There has been no Corporate Transaction since the adoption of the Incentive and Retention Plan.
6. Related-party Transaction
Effective January 1, 1990, John H. Alexander, an officer and director of the Company participated with a group of investors that acquired the mineral and fee interest on one of the Company's oil and gas leases (Santa Fe Energy lease) in the Carneros Creek field after the Company declined to participate. The thirty-three percent interest owned by Mr. Alexander represents a minority interest in the investor group. Royalties on oil and gas production from this property paid to the investor group approximated $180,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $176,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
7. Stock Based Compensation
The Company issued warrants and options to purchase common shares of the Company as compensation for consulting and Board of Directors services. The value of warrants and options issued for compensation are accounted for as a non-cash expense to the Company at the fair value of the warrants and options issued. The Company values the warrants and options at fair value as calculated by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As of September 30, 2012 the Company has $0 in unamortized stock based compensation related to outstanding options and warrants.
The following table summarizes the warrant and option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Number of | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | Warrants and Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 | 25,000 | $ | 4.08 | |||||
Granted | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Exercised | (15,000 | ) | 4.46 | |||||
Cancelled | — | — | ||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2012 | 10,000 | $ | 5.40 |
On July 2, 2012 and September 20, 2012 consultants exercised the remaining 15,000 warrants under “cash-less” exercise provisions of the warrant agreement. As a result, 4,232 shares of common stock were delivered to the warrant holders.
12 |
The following summarizes the options issued, outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2012:
Grant Date | June 2, 2011 | |||
Strike Price | $ | 5.40 | ||
Expiration Date | June 1, 2016 | |||
Options Remaining | 10,000 | |||
Proceeds if Exercised | $ | 54,000 |
8. Fair Value
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820 (formerly SFAS No. 157) for our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820 for measuring the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities during 2008. As defined in FASB ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Included in this category is the Company's determination of the value of its asset retirement obligation liability. The obligation has increased $25,961 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of normal accretion expense and the drilling of a new well.
The carrying amount of our cash and equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The amounts below represent only balances measured at fair value during the period presented and still held as of the reporting date. These balances appear as a component of the “Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment” and “Accumulated Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Valuation Allowances” captions on the balance sheet.
At and for the period ended September 30, 2011: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas properties and equipment | $ | 897,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 224,000 | $ | (673,000 | ) |
Oil and gas properties and equipment held and used with a carrying amount of $897,000 were written down to their fair value of $224,000, resulting in a valuation charge of $673,000, which was included in earnings for the period. The fair value of these long-lived assets held and used was calculated based upon discounted cash flow projections. These projections incorporate management's assumptions about future cash flows based upon past experience and future expectations. The expected cash flows are then discounted using a discount rate that the Company believes is commensurate with the risks involved. There has been no valuation charge incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
13 |
9. Registration Statement on Form S-3
The Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 22, 2009, that became effective on January 14, 2010. The registration statement is designed to provide the Company the flexibility to offer and sell from time to time up to $20 million of the Company's common stock. The Company may offer and sell such securities through one or more methods of distribution, subject to market conditions and the Company's capital needs. The terms of any offering under the shelf registration statement will be established at the time of such offering and will be described in a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC prior to the completion of the offering. The Company has not filed any supplemental prospectus with the SEC or sold any common stock under this registration statement.
10. Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company recognizes a liability at discounted fair value for the future retirement of tangible long-lived assets and associated assets retirement cost associated with the petroleum and natural gas properties. The fair value of the liability is capitalized as part of the cost of the related asset and amortized to expense over its useful life. The liability accretes until the date of expected settlement of the retirement obligations. The related accretion expense is recognized in the statement of operations. The provision will be revised for the effect of any changes to timing related to cash flow or undiscounted abandonment costs. Actual expenditures incurred for the purpose of site reclamation are charged to the asset retirement obligations to the extent that the liability exists on the balance sheet. Differences between the actual costs incurred and the fair value of the liability recorded are recognized in income in the period the actual costs are incurred.
There are no legally restricted assets for the settlement of asset retirement obligations. A reconciliation of the Company's asset retirement obligations from the periods presented, are as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 1,278,889 | ||
Incurred during the period | (14,105 | ) | ||
Additions for new wells | 8,096 | |||
Accretion expense | 31,970 | |||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | 1,304,850 |
11. Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2012 through the date these unaudited financial statements were issued.
14 |
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Looking forward into the balance of fiscal 2012, crude oil prices have decreased by $6.50 per barrel.
The Company is in the process of acquiring Victory Oil Company's 32% working interest in the Pike 1-H well and 50 acres of surface and mineral interests associated with Victory's Murphy Fee property. The transaction will give Pyramid 100% working interest in the Pike 1-H. Both Companies expect to conclude the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012.
The Company has further strengthened its financial position as it continues to evaluate opportunities to increase reserves and production volumes. At September 30, 2012, Pyramid's balance sheet remained free of long-term debt and included cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $5.7 million, up from $4.9 million at December 31, 2011. Pyramid also held long-term assets in the form of certificates of deposit of $1.1 million.
Pyramid has maintained a strong balance sheet and working capital position, and management continues to seek and evaluate opportunities within the energy sector to enhance the value of the Company. Pyramid's growth during the balance of 2012 will be highly dependent on the level of success the Company has in its operations and capital investments, including the outcome of wells that have not yet been drilled. The Company's future capital investment program may be modified due to exploration and development successes or failures, market conditions and other variables. The production and sales of oil and gas involves many complex processes that are subject to numerous uncertainties, including reservoir risk, mechanical failures, human error and market conditions.
The Company has positioned itself, over the past several years, to withstand various types of economic uncertainties, with a program of consolidating operations on certain producing properties and concentrating on properties that provide the major revenue sources. The drilling of a new well and several limited work-overs of certain wells have allowed the Company to maintain its crude oil reserves for the last three years. The Company expects to maintain its reserve base in 2012 by drilling new wells and routine maintenance of its existing wells.
The Company may be subject to future costs necessary for compliance with the new implementation of air and water environmental quality requirements of the various state and federal governmental agencies. The requirements and costs are unknown at this time, but management believes that costs could be significant in some cases. As the scope of the requirements become more clearly defined, management may be better equipped to determine the true costs to the Company.
The Company continues to absorb the costs for various state and local fees and permits under new environmental programs, the sum of which were not material during 2011. The Company retains outside consultants to assist the Company in maintaining compliance with these regulations. The Company is actively pursuing an ongoing policy of upgrading and restoring older properties to comply with current and proposed environmental regulations. The costs of upgrading and restoring older properties to comply with environmental regulations have not been determined. Management believes that these costs will not have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations.
15 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Portions of the Quarterly Report, including Management's Discussion and Analysis, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results and performance in future periods to be materially different from any future results or performance suggested in forward-looking statements in this release. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report and the Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements found herein to reflect any changes in Company expectations or results or any change in events. Factors that could cause results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices of oil, gas and electricity, environmental risk, drilling and operational costs, uncertainties about estimates of reserves and government regulations.
ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
REVENUES
The decrease in oil and gas sales of $213,922 is due primarily to lower crude oil production combined with lower average sales prices for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The Company's net revenue share of crude oil production/sales decreased by approximately 1,400 barrels for the third quarter of 2012. The average sales price of the Company's oil and gas for the third quarter of 2012 decreased by approximately $5.25 per equivalent barrel when compared to the same period of 2011. The decline in production for the third quarter of 2012 is not attributable to any one property. Many of the Company’s oil and gas leases had lower production due primarily to natural decline.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses increased by $54,717 for the third quarter of 2012. The cost to produce an equivalent barrel of crude oil during the second quarter of 2012 was approximately $39.69 per barrel, an increase of approximately $8.31 per barrel when compared with production costs for the third quarter of 2011. The net increase in lease operating expenses is caused by many offsetting factors. These include higher costs for equipment fuel, gas engine repairs, licenses and permits and well abandonment costs. These were offset by lower costs for pump repairs.
Equipment fuel costs increased by $13,220 due primarily to an increase in average fuel costs for gasoline and diesel and higher volumes purchased during the third quarter of 2012. In 2011, the Company recorded the purchase of approximately $4,100 of fuel costs as rig maintenance costs for the Pike 1-H well. Gas engine repairs increased by $13,205 due primarily to maintenance activities on the Santa Fe and Anderson wells. Licenses and permits increased by $11,015 due primarily to fees related to the Santa Fe lease. The costs to abandon two wells increased by $7,384 during the third quarter of 2012. No wells were abandoned in the third quarter of 2011. Downhole pump repairs decreased by $10,488 due to lower activity in this cost category.
Inventory change increased operating expenses by $10,143 for the third quarter of 2012 and decreased operating expenses by $10,492 for the third quarter of 2011. As a result, operating expenses increased by $20,635 for the third quarter of 2012, when compared with the same period of 2011. The decrease in inventory at September 30, 2012 of $10,143 is due primarily to lower inventory volumes at September 30, 2012 offset by higher average per unit inventory values. The increase in inventory at September 30, 2011 of $10,492 is due primarily to higher inventory volumes combined with higher average per barrel inventory valuations.
16 |
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expenses decreased by $29,673 for the third quarter of 2012 when compared with the same period for 2011. Accounting services decreased by $19,533 due primarily to lower fees for audit services. Legal services decreased by $17,200 due primarily to the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 that was filed in the third quarter of 2011. This was offset by higher fees for outside services. Outside services increased by $8,396 due primarily to the hiring of temporary help for the corporate office staff.
PROVISION FOR DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
The provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization decreased by $32,706 for the third quarter of 2012, when compared with the same period for 2011. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease in depletion of the Company’s oil and gas properties due to a decline in the volume of oil and gas sales.
VALUATION ALLOWANCES
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $673,000 against the costs of drilling the Pike 1-H well. The Pike 1-H was drilled in the first quarter of 2011 and did not respond favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from the well. There have been no valuation allowances recorded in 2012.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
REVENUES
The decrease in oil and gas sales of $379,877 is due primarily to lower crude oil sales volumes offset by higher average sales prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company's net revenue share of crude oil production/sales decreased by approximately 4,600 barrels for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decline in production for the first nine months of 2012 is not attributable to any one property. Many of the oil and gas leases had lower production due primarily to natural decline. The average sales price of the Company's oil and gas for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $2.76 per equivalent barrel when compared to the same period of 2011.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses increased by $82,911 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The cost to produce an equivalent barrel of crude oil during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $37.22 per barrel, an increase of approximately $6.18 per barrel when compared with production costs for the same period of 2011. The increase in lease operating expenses is caused by many factors. These include higher costs for equipment fuel, gas engine repairs, parts and supplies, licenses and fees, professional services and contract operations. These were offset by lower costs for pump repairs, outside services, insurance expense and equipment rental.
Equipment fuel costs increased by $40,608 due primarily to an increase in fuel consumed combined with higher average fuel costs for gasoline and diesel used by the Company’s vehicles and production equipment. Gas engine repairs increased by $28,006 due primarily to maintenance activities on the Santa Fe and Anderson wells. Parts and supplies increased by $14,767 due to higher maintenance activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Licenses and permits increased by $13,433 due primarily to fees related to the Santa Fe lease. Professional services increased by $8,388 due to a review of the Company’s Pike #1-H well that was conducted by a third-party petroleum engineering firm. Contract operations increased by $8,282 due to higher costs on the New York and Wyoming joint ventures.
17 |
Downhole pump repairs decreased by $15,048 due to lower activity in this cost category. Outside services decreased by $12,848 due to lower demand for third-party repair and maintenance services. Insurance expense decreased by $12,223 due to lower premiums for auto, health and workers’ compensation insurance. Equipment rental costs decreased by $9,937 due primarily to lower costs on the Pike lease during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company leased the surface pumping unit and a crude oil storage tank for the new 1-H well that was drilled in the first quarter of 2011.
Inventory change increased operating expenses by $12,131 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and decreased operating expenses by $10,336 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As a result, operating expenses increased by $22,467 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared with the same period of 2011. The decrease in inventory at September 30, 2012 of $12,131 is due primarily to lower inventory volumes at September 30, 2012 offset by higher average per unit values. The increase in inventory at September 30, 2011 of $10,336 is due primarily to higher average per barrel inventory valuations offset by lower inventory volumes.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expenses decreased by $33,571 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 when compared with the same period for 2011. Accounting services decreased by $47,404 due to lower audit fees and lower fees paid to a third-party individual who has assisted with the training and implementation of a new oil and gas accounting software that was effective January 1, 2011. Legal fees declined by $19,337 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due primarily to the filing of a Form S-8 during 2011. The legal fees expended for the filing of the Form S-8 during 2011 were $17,500. Outside services increased by $10,417 due primarily to the hiring of temporary help for the corporate office staff. General expenses increased by $8,000 due to a donation the Company made during the second quarter of 2012 to a local medical facility. General liability insurance increased by $6,973 due to an increase in the allocation of insurance costs to general and administrative expense from operating expenses during 2012. The remaining net increase in general and administrative costs of $7,780 is attributable to many different cost categories, none of them significant in amount.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Effective June 2, 2011, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company’s two outside directors. These options vest immediately and must be exercised within ninety days after the director leaves office. The Company recorded $43,743 in stock based compensation during the third quarter of 2011, based on a valuation performed using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
PROVISION FOR DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
The provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization decreased by $76,235 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared with the same period for 2011. The amortization of Texas leaseholds decreased by approximately $48,000 during 2012. The Texas leaseholds were fully amortized as of June 30, 2011. Depletion of oil and gas properties decreased by $25,613 due primarily to a decline in the volume of oil and gas sales.
18 |
VALUATION ALLOWANCES
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $673,000 against the costs of drilling the Pike 1-H well. The Pike 1-H was drilled in the first quarter of 2011 and did not respond favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from the well.
On March 21, 2011, the Company participated in the drilling of a joint venture well in Menard County, Texas. Log analysis of this well indicated that the well would not be commercially viable, and was plugged and abandoned. The Company owned a 30% interest in the joint venture. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $54,384 against the costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011 for the drilling of this well.
There have been no valuation allowances recorded in 2012.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $819,966 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, operating activities provided cash of $1,745,498. Cash was used for capital spending of $848,952 and principal payments on long-term debt of $48,634. See the Statements of Cash Flows for additional detailed information. The Company had available a line of credit of $500,000 and short-term and long-term investments of $3,228,310 at September 30, 2012 that provided additional liquidity during the first nine months of 2012.
IMPACT OF CHANGING PRICES
The Company’s revenue is affected by crude oil prices paid by the major oil companies. Average crude oil prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $2.76 per equivalent barrel when compared with the same period of 2011. The Company cannot predict the future course of crude oil prices.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not Applicable
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
19 |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. - Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A. - Risk Factors
See the risk factors that are included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 2. - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. - Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. - Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 5. - Other Information
None
Item 6. - Exhibits
31.1 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Executive Officer under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15-d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Financial Officer under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15-d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
20 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PYRAMID OIL COMPANY | |
(registrant) | |
Dated: November 14, 2012 | JOHN H. ALEXANDER |
John H. Alexander | |
President | |
Dated: November 14, 2012 | LEE G. CHRISTIANSON |
Lee G. Christianson | |
Chief Financial Officer |
21 |