UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

xQuarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

 

¨Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from              to           

 

Commission File Number 001-32989

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

CALIFORNIA   94-0787340

(State of other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

2008 – 21st. Street. P.O. Box 832, Bakersfield, California   93302
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

Registrant's telephone number: (661) 325-1000  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.

 

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨ Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

(Class) (Outstanding at November 14, 2012)
Common Stock Without Par Value 4,688,085

 

 
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2012

 

Table of Contents

 

    Page
     
PART I  
     
Item 1. Financial Statements  
     
  Balance Sheets - September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)  
  and December 31, 2011 3
     
  Statements of Operations -  
  Three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) 5
  Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) 6
     
  Statements of Cash Flows -  
  Nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited) 7
     
  Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) 9
     
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of  Financial Condition and Results of Operations 15
     
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 19
     
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 19
     
PART II  
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 20
     
Item 1A. Risk Factors 20
     
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 20
     
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 20
     
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 20
     
Item 5. Other Information 20
     
Item 6. Exhibits 20

 

2
 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

BALANCE SHEETS

 

ASSETS

 

   September 30,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   (Unaudited)   (Audited) 
           
CURRENT ASSETS:          
Cash and cash equivalents  $3,582,642   $2,762,676 
Short-term investments   2,134,391    2,128,380 
Trade accounts receivable  (net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $4,000 in 2012 and 2011)   431,151    555,495 
Income taxes receivable   55,569    21,169 
Crude oil inventory   106,025    118,156 
Prepaid expenses and other assets   116,140    255,846 
Deferred Income taxes   262,500    262,500 
           
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS   6,688,418    6,104,222 
           
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:          
           
Oil and gas properties and equipment (successful efforts method)   19,919,006    19,124,558 
Capitalized asset retirement costs   409,338    401,242 
Drilling and operating equipment   1,966,750    1,956,371 
Land, buildings and improvements   1,073,918    1,073,918 
Automotive, office and other property and equipment   1,228,147    1,192,118 
    24,597,159    23,748,207 
Less - accumulated depletion,  depreciation, amortization and valuation allowances   (20,611,051)   (20,091,655)
           
TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT   3,986,108    3,656,552 
           
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS          
Long-term investments   1,093,919    1,071,984 
Deferred income taxes   608,700    781,600 
Deposits   250,000    250,000 
Other assets   17,380    17,380 
           
TOTAL INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS   1,969,999    2,120,964 
           
TOTAL ASSETS  $12,644,525   $11,881,738 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.

 

3
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

BALANCE SHEETS

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

  

   September 30,   December 31, 
   2012   2011 
   (Unaudited)   (Audited) 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:          
Accounts payable  $147,763   $88,494 
Accrued professional fees   126,876    142,990 
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes   40,203    77,471 
Accrued payroll and related costs   62,987    51,252 
Accrued royalties payable   206,513    224,810 
Accrued insurance   0    82,428 
Current maturities of long-term debt   5,981    32,285 
           
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES   590,323    699,730 
           
Long-term debt, net of current maturities   0    22,330 
           
LIABILITY FOR ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS   1,304,850    1,278,889 
           
TOTAL LIABILITES   1,895,173    2,000,949 
           
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 4)          
           
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:          
Preferred stock, no par value Authorized - 10,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding - none   0    0 
Common stock, no par value (Note 5, 7 and 9) Authorized - 50,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding - 4,688,085 shares and 4,683,853 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively   1,682,971    1,682,971 
Retained earnings   9,066,381    8,197,818 
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   10,749,352    9,880,789 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  $12,644,525   $11,881,738 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.

 

4
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Three months ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2011 
REVENUES:          
Oil and gas sales  $1,198,420   $1,412,842 
           
COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
Operating expenses   476,122    421,405 
General and administrative   192,910    222,583 
Stock based compensation   0    0 
Taxes, other than income and payroll taxes   44,885    37,399 
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization   151,502    184,208 
Valuation allowances   0    673,000 
Accretion expense   13,153    5,229 
Other costs and expenses   33,975    31,280 
    912,547    1,575,104 
           
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)   285,873    (162,262)
           
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):          
Interest income   10,975    12,193 
Other income   0    0 
Interest expense   (152)   (568)
    10,823    11,625 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE          
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)   296,696    (150,637)
Income tax provision (benefit)          
Current   16,800    52,700 
Deferred   72,000    (207,600)
    88,800    (154,900)
           
NET INCOME  $207,896   $4,263 
           
BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE  $0.04   $0.00 
           
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE  $0.04   $0.00 
           
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding   4,687,644    4,683,853 
           
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding   4,687,644    4,685,177 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

5
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2011 
REVENUES:          
Oil and gas sales  $3,907,792   $4,289,181 
           
COSTS AND EXPENSES:          
Operating expenses   1,365,861    1,282,950 
General and administrative   632,804    666,375 
Stock based compensation   0    43,743 
Taxes, other than income and payroll taxes   129,266    101,358 
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization   519,396    595,631 
Valuation allowances   0    727,384 
Accretion expense   31,970    26,793 
Other costs and expenses   118,449    118,964 
    2,797,746    3,563,198 
           
OPERATING INCOME   1,110,046    725,983 
           
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):          
Interest income   31,835    38,704 
Other income   250    500 
Interest expense   (868)   (2,459)
    31,217    36,745 
INCOME BEFORE          
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)   1,141,263    762,728 
Income tax provision (benefit)          
Current   99,800    163,300 
Deferred   172,900    (151,500)
    272,700    11,800 
           
NET INCOME  $868,563   $750,928 
           
BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE  $0.19   $0.16 
           
DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE  $0.19   $0.16 
           
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding   4,685,117    4,682,492 
           
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding   4,685,117    4,688,465 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

6
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2011 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
Net income  $868,563   $750,928 
           
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:          
           
Provision for depletion, depreciation, and amortization   519,396    595,631 
Valuation allowances   0    727,384 
Gain on sale of fixed assets   0    (1,512)
Stock based compensation   0    43,743 
Accretion expense   31,970    26,793 
Deferred income taxes   172,900    (151,900)
Asset retirement obligations   (6,009)   11,779 
           
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Decrease (increase) in trade accounts and income tax receivable   89,944    (44,150)
Decrease (increase) in crude oil inventories   12,131    (10,336)
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets   139,706    139,016 
(Increase) in other assets   0    (10,000)
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (83,103)   (127,108)
           
Net cash provided by operating activities   1,745,498    1,950,268 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

7
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

 

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

  

   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2012   2011 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
           
Capital expenditures  $(848,952)  $(1,137,941)
Payments to acquire short-term investments   0    (100,000)
(Increase) in short-term investments   (6,011)   (22,574)
(Increase) in long-term investments   (21,935)   (9,516)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment   0    21,500 
           
Net cash used in investing activities   (876,898)   (1,248,531)
           
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
           
Loans to employees   0    (1,300)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt   0    55,979 
Principal payments from loans to employees   0    900 
Principal payments on long-term debt   (48,634)   (25,842)
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (48,634)   29,737 
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   819,966    731,474 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year   2,762,676    1,535,532 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period  $3,582,642   $2,267,006 
           
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:          
           
Cash paid during the nine months for interest  $868   $2,459 
           
Cash paid during the nine months for income taxes  $134,200   $185,598 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

8
 

 

PYRAMID OIL COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2012

(UNAUDITED)

 

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The financial statements include the accounts of Pyramid Oil Company (the “Company”). Such financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

 

A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is contained in its December 31, 2011 Form 10-K which is incorporated herein by reference. The financial data presented herein should be read in conjunction with the Company's December 31, 2011 financial statements and notes thereto, contained in the Company's Form 10-K.

 

In the opinion of the Company, the unaudited financial statements, contained herein, include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position as of September 30, 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.

 

Income Taxes - When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

 

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, California, Texas and New York states. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examination for the years before 2009. State jurisdictions that remain subject to examination range from 2008 to 2011. The Company does not believe there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

 

The Company policy is to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of the date of adoption of FASB ASC 740, the Company did not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any interest expense recognized during the quarter.

 

Interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as interest expense and penalties are classified in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of income.

 

Income (Loss) per Share - Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

 

9
 

 

Valuation Allowances - The Company has recorded valuation allowances for certain of its oil and gas properties when the undiscounted future net cash flows are less than the net capitalized costs for the property. On March 21, 2011, the Company participated in the drilling of a joint venture well in Menard County, Texas. Log analysis of this well indicated that the well would not be commercially viable, and was plugged and abandoned. The Company owns a 30% interest in the joint venture. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $54,384 against the costs incurred during the first nine months of 2011 for the drilling of this well. There was no valuation allowance recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

In addition, the Company determined that the assets related to its joint venture in the Pike 1-H well may have been impaired because the results of drilling operations there had not fulfilled expectations and has not responded favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from this well.  During the third quarter of 2011, the Company determined that well assets of $897,000 were impaired and wrote them down by $673,000 to their estimated fair value.  The estimated fair value was based upon estimated future cash flows to be generated by the wells estimated production discounted at a market rate of interest.

 

Joint Interest Billing Receivable - The Company entered into a joint venture agreement on February 23, 2011 with Victory Oil Company for the drilling of a well on the Company’s Pike lease. The Pike 1-H well was drilled during the first quarter of 2011. The well was completed and placed into production during April 2011. The Company’s share of the total costs for drilling and completing this well are 68% and Victory Oil’s share of costs are 32%. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s share of costs for drilling this well were approximately $897,000 and Victory Oil’s share of the costs were approximately $422,000. At September 30, 2011, the Company has a joint interest billing receivable of $10,776 from Victory Oil for its share of the costs of operating this well. At September 30, 2012, the Company has a joint interest billing receivable of $3,647 from Victory Oil for its share of the costs of operating this well.

 

2. Dividends

 

No cash dividends were paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

3. Commitments and Contingencies

 

In February 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John H. Alexander pursuant to which Mr. Alexander agreed to serve as the Company's Vice President. On June 3, 2004, Mr. Alexander was appointed as the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement is for an initial term of six years, which term automatically renews annually if written notice is not tendered. The agreement was automatically renewed on June 3, 2012.

 

Pursuant to the employment agreement, the Company may terminate Mr. Alexander's employment with or without cause at any time before its term expires upon providing written notice. In the event the Company terminates Mr. Alexander's employment without cause, Mr. Alexander would be entitled to receive a severance amount equal to his annual base salary and benefits for the balance of the term of his employment agreement. In the event of termination by reason of Mr. Alexander's death or permanent disability, his legal representative will be entitled to receive his annual salary and benefits for the remaining term of his employment agreement. In the event of, or termination following, a change in control of the Company, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Alexander would be entitled to receive his annual salary and benefits for the remainder of the term of his agreement. In the event that Mr. Alexander is terminated the Company would incur approximately $870,000 in costs.

 

The Company has been notified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of a final settlement offer to settle its potential liability as a generator of waste containing hazardous substances that was disposed of at a waste disposal site in Santa Barbara County. The Company has responded to the EPA by indicating that the waste contained petroleum products that fall within the exception to the definition of hazardous substances for petroleum-related substances of the pertinent EPA regulations. Management has concluded that under both Federal and State regulations no reasonable basis exists for any valid claim against the Company. As such, the likelihood of any settlement is deemed remote. There has been not further communication form the EPA on this matter since September 25, 2009.

 

10
 

 

4. Income Tax Provision

 

The Company recognized an income tax provision of $272,700 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and a net income tax provision of $11,800 for the same period in 2011.

 

Income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was calculated as follows:

 

   Federal   State   Total 
             
Current tax provision  $85,300   $14,500   $99,800 
Deferred tax provision   134,550    38,350    172,900 
                
   $219,850   $52,850   $272,700 

 

Income tax provision (benefit) for the nine months September 30, 2011 was calculated as follows:

 

   Federal   State   Total 
             
Current tax provision  $140,000   $23,300   $163,300 
Deferred tax (benefit)   (117,800)   (33,700)   (151,500)
                
   $22,200   $(10,400)  $11,800 

 

Income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was calculated as follows:

 

   Federal   State   Total 
             
Current tax provision  $14,300   $2,500   $16,800 
Deferred tax provision   56,050    15,950    72,000 
                
   $70,350   $18,450   $88,800 

 

Income tax provision (benefit) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was calculated as follows:

 

   Federal   State   Total 
             
Current tax provision  $45,200   $7,500   $52,700 
Deferred tax (benefit)   (161,600)   (46,000)   (207,600)
                
   $(116,400)  $(38,500)  $(154,900)

 

Deferred income taxes are recognized using the asset and liability method by applying income tax rates to cumulative temporary differences based on when and how they are expected to affect the tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for income tax rate changes. Deferred income tax assets have been offset by a valuation allowance of $1,719,000 as of September 30, 2012. Management reviews deferred income taxes regularly throughout the year, and accordingly makes any necessary adjustments to properly reflect the valuation allowance based upon current financial trends and projected results.

 

11
 

 

5. Incentive and Retention Plan

 

On January 9, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors adopted an Incentive and Retention Plan pursuant to which the Company's officers and other employees selected by the Company's Compensation Committee are entitled to receive payments if they are employed by the Company as of the date of a 'Corporate Transaction,' as defined in the Incentive and Retention Plan. A 'Corporate Transaction' includes certain mergers involving the Company, sales of Company assets, and other changes in the control of the Company, as specified in the Incentive and Retention Plan. In general, the amount that is payable to each plan participant will equal the number of plan units that have been granted to him or her, multiplied by the increase in the value of the Company between January 9, 2007 and the date of a Corporate Transaction. There has been no Corporate Transaction since the adoption of the Incentive and Retention Plan.

 

6. Related-party Transaction

 

Effective January 1, 1990, John H. Alexander, an officer and director of the Company participated with a group of investors that acquired the mineral and fee interest on one of the Company's oil and gas leases (Santa Fe Energy lease) in the Carneros Creek field after the Company declined to participate. The thirty-three percent interest owned by Mr. Alexander represents a minority interest in the investor group. Royalties on oil and gas production from this property paid to the investor group approximated $180,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $176,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

7. Stock Based Compensation

 

The Company issued warrants and options to purchase common shares of the Company as compensation for consulting and Board of Directors services. The value of warrants and options issued for compensation are accounted for as a non-cash expense to the Company at the fair value of the warrants and options issued. The Company values the warrants and options at fair value as calculated by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As of September 30, 2012 the Company has $0 in unamortized stock based compensation related to outstanding options and warrants.

 

The following table summarizes the warrant and option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

   Number of     
(Unaudited)  Warrants and
Options
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 
           
Outstanding, December 31, 2011   25,000   $4.08 
Granted   0    0 
Exercised   (15,000)   4.46 
Cancelled        
Outstanding, September 30, 2012   10,000   $5.40 

 

On July 2, 2012 and September 20, 2012 consultants exercised the remaining 15,000 warrants under “cash-less” exercise provisions of the warrant agreement. As a result, 4,232 shares of common stock were delivered to the warrant holders.

 

12
 

 

The following summarizes the options issued, outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2012:

 

Grant Date   June 2, 2011 
Strike Price  $5.40 
Expiration Date    June 1, 2016 
Options Remaining   10,000 
Proceeds if Exercised  $54,000 

 

8. Fair Value

 

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820 (formerly SFAS No. 157) for our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820 for measuring the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities during 2008. As defined in FASB ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

 

Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Included in this category is the Company's determination of the value of its asset retirement obligation liability. The obligation has increased $25,961 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of normal accretion expense and the drilling of a new well.

 

The carrying amount of our cash and equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

 

Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The amounts below represent only balances measured at fair value during the period presented and still held as of the reporting date.  These balances appear as a component of the “Oil and Gas Properties and Equipment” and “Accumulated Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Valuation Allowances” captions on the balance sheet.

 

   At and for the period ended September 30, 2011: 
   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total
Valuation
 
Oil and gas properties and equipment  $897,000   $   $   $224,000   $(673,000)

 

Oil and gas properties and equipment held and used with a carrying amount of $897,000 were written down to their fair value of $224,000, resulting in a valuation charge of $673,000, which was included in earnings for the period.  The fair value of these long-lived assets held and used was calculated based upon discounted cash flow projections.  These projections incorporate management's assumptions about future cash flows based upon past experience and future expectations.  The expected cash flows are then discounted using a discount rate that the Company believes is commensurate with the risks involved.  There has been no valuation charge incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

13
 

 

9. Registration Statement on Form S-3

 

The Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 22, 2009, that became effective on January 14, 2010. The registration statement is designed to provide the Company the flexibility to offer and sell from time to time up to $20 million of the Company's common stock. The Company may offer and sell such securities through one or more methods of distribution, subject to market conditions and the Company's capital needs. The terms of any offering under the shelf registration statement will be established at the time of such offering and will be described in a prospectus supplement filed with the SEC prior to the completion of the offering. The Company has not filed any supplemental prospectus with the SEC or sold any common stock under this registration statement.

 

10. Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company recognizes a liability at discounted fair value for the future retirement of tangible long-lived assets and associated assets retirement cost associated with the petroleum and natural gas properties. The fair value of the liability is capitalized as part of the cost of the related asset and amortized to expense over its useful life. The liability accretes until the date of expected settlement of the retirement obligations. The related accretion expense is recognized in the statement of operations. The provision will be revised for the effect of any changes to timing related to cash flow or undiscounted abandonment costs. Actual expenditures incurred for the purpose of site reclamation are charged to the asset retirement obligations to the extent that the liability exists on the balance sheet. Differences between the actual costs incurred and the fair value of the liability recorded are recognized in income in the period the actual costs are incurred.

 

There are no legally restricted assets for the settlement of asset retirement obligations. A reconciliation of the Company's asset retirement obligations from the periods presented, are as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2011  $1,278,889 
Incurred during the period   (14,105)
Additions for new wells   8,096 
Accretion expense   31,970 
Balance at September 30, 2012  $1,304,850 

 

11. Subsequent Events

 

The Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2012 through the date these unaudited financial statements were issued.

 

14
 

 

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

 

Looking forward into the balance of fiscal 2012, crude oil prices have decreased by $6.50 per barrel.

 

The Company is in the process of acquiring Victory Oil Company's 32% working interest in the Pike 1-H well and 50 acres of surface and mineral interests associated with Victory's Murphy Fee property. The transaction will give Pyramid 100% working interest in the Pike 1-H. Both Companies expect to conclude the transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012.

 

The Company has further strengthened its financial position as it continues to evaluate opportunities to increase reserves and production volumes. At September 30, 2012, Pyramid's balance sheet remained free of long-term debt and included cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $5.7 million, up from $4.9 million at December 31, 2011. Pyramid also held long-term assets in the form of certificates of deposit of $1.1 million.

 

Pyramid has maintained a strong balance sheet and working capital position, and management continues to seek and evaluate opportunities within the energy sector to enhance the value of the Company. Pyramid's growth during the balance of 2012 will be highly dependent on the level of success the Company has in its operations and capital investments, including the outcome of wells that have not yet been drilled. The Company's future capital investment program may be modified due to exploration and development successes or failures, market conditions and other variables. The production and sales of oil and gas involves many complex processes that are subject to numerous uncertainties, including reservoir risk, mechanical failures, human error and market conditions.

 

The Company has positioned itself, over the past several years, to withstand various types of economic uncertainties, with a program of consolidating operations on certain producing properties and concentrating on properties that provide the major revenue sources. The drilling of a new well and several limited work-overs of certain wells have allowed the Company to maintain its crude oil reserves for the last three years. The Company expects to maintain its reserve base in 2012 by drilling new wells and routine maintenance of its existing wells.

 

The Company may be subject to future costs necessary for compliance with the new implementation of air and water environmental quality requirements of the various state and federal governmental agencies. The requirements and costs are unknown at this time, but management believes that costs could be significant in some cases. As the scope of the requirements become more clearly defined, management may be better equipped to determine the true costs to the Company.

 

The Company continues to absorb the costs for various state and local fees and permits under new environmental programs, the sum of which were not material during 2011. The Company retains outside consultants to assist the Company in maintaining compliance with these regulations. The Company is actively pursuing an ongoing policy of upgrading and restoring older properties to comply with current and proposed environmental regulations. The costs of upgrading and restoring older properties to comply with environmental regulations have not been determined. Management believes that these costs will not have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations.

 

15
 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Portions of the Quarterly Report, including Management's Discussion and Analysis, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results and performance in future periods to be materially different from any future results or performance suggested in forward-looking statements in this release. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report and the Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements found herein to reflect any changes in Company expectations or results or any change in events. Factors that could cause results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices of oil, gas and electricity, environmental risk, drilling and operational costs, uncertainties about estimates of reserves and government regulations.

 

ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

 

REVENUES

 

The decrease in oil and gas sales of $213,922 is due primarily to lower crude oil production combined with lower average sales prices for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The Company's net revenue share of crude oil production/sales decreased by approximately 1,400 barrels for the third quarter of 2012. The average sales price of the Company's oil and gas for the third quarter of 2012 decreased by approximately $5.25 per equivalent barrel when compared to the same period of 2011. The decline in production for the third quarter of 2012 is not attributable to any one property. Many of the Company’s oil and gas leases had lower production due primarily to natural decline.

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

Operating expenses increased by $54,717 for the third quarter of 2012. The cost to produce an equivalent barrel of crude oil during the second quarter of 2012 was approximately $39.69 per barrel, an increase of approximately $8.31 per barrel when compared with production costs for the third quarter of 2011. The net increase in lease operating expenses is caused by many offsetting factors. These include higher costs for equipment fuel, gas engine repairs, licenses and permits and well abandonment costs. These were offset by lower costs for pump repairs.

 

Equipment fuel costs increased by $13,220 due primarily to an increase in average fuel costs for gasoline and diesel and higher volumes purchased during the third quarter of 2012. In 2011, the Company recorded the purchase of approximately $4,100 of fuel costs as rig maintenance costs for the Pike 1-H well. Gas engine repairs increased by $13,205 due primarily to maintenance activities on the Santa Fe and Anderson wells. Licenses and permits increased by $11,015 due primarily to fees related to the Santa Fe lease. The costs to abandon two wells increased by $7,384 during the third quarter of 2012. No wells were abandoned in the third quarter of 2011. Downhole pump repairs decreased by $10,488 due to lower activity in this cost category.

 

Inventory change increased operating expenses by $10,143 for the third quarter of 2012 and decreased operating expenses by $10,492 for the third quarter of 2011. As a result, operating expenses increased by $20,635 for the third quarter of 2012, when compared with the same period of 2011. The decrease in inventory at September 30, 2012 of $10,143 is due primarily to lower inventory volumes at September 30, 2012 offset by higher average per unit inventory values. The increase in inventory at September 30, 2011 of $10,492 is due primarily to higher inventory volumes combined with higher average per barrel inventory valuations.

 

16
 

 

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

 

General and administrative expenses decreased by $29,673 for the third quarter of 2012 when compared with the same period for 2011. Accounting services decreased by $19,533 due primarily to lower fees for audit services. Legal services decreased by $17,200 due primarily to the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 that was filed in the third quarter of 2011. This was offset by higher fees for outside services. Outside services increased by $8,396 due primarily to the hiring of temporary help for the corporate office staff.

 

PROVISION FOR DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

 

The provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization decreased by $32,706 for the third quarter of 2012, when compared with the same period for 2011. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease in depletion of the Company’s oil and gas properties due to a decline in the volume of oil and gas sales.

 

VALUATION ALLOWANCES

 

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $673,000 against the costs of drilling the Pike 1-H well. The Pike 1-H was drilled in the first quarter of 2011 and did not respond favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from the well. There have been no valuation allowances recorded in 2012.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

 

REVENUES

 

The decrease in oil and gas sales of $379,877 is due primarily to lower crude oil sales volumes offset by higher average sales prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company's net revenue share of crude oil production/sales decreased by approximately 4,600 barrels for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decline in production for the first nine months of 2012 is not attributable to any one property. Many of the oil and gas leases had lower production due primarily to natural decline. The average sales price of the Company's oil and gas for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $2.76 per equivalent barrel when compared to the same period of 2011.

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

Operating expenses increased by $82,911 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The cost to produce an equivalent barrel of crude oil during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $37.22 per barrel, an increase of approximately $6.18 per barrel when compared with production costs for the same period of 2011. The increase in lease operating expenses is caused by many factors. These include higher costs for equipment fuel, gas engine repairs, parts and supplies, licenses and fees, professional services and contract operations. These were offset by lower costs for pump repairs, outside services, insurance expense and equipment rental.

 

Equipment fuel costs increased by $40,608 due primarily to an increase in fuel consumed combined with higher average fuel costs for gasoline and diesel used by the Company’s vehicles and production equipment. Gas engine repairs increased by $28,006 due primarily to maintenance activities on the Santa Fe and Anderson wells. Parts and supplies increased by $14,767 due to higher maintenance activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Licenses and permits increased by $13,433 due primarily to fees related to the Santa Fe lease. Professional services increased by $8,388 due to a review of the Company’s Pike #1-H well that was conducted by a third-party petroleum engineering firm. Contract operations increased by $8,282 due to higher costs on the New York and Wyoming joint ventures.

 

17
 

 

Downhole pump repairs decreased by $15,048 due to lower activity in this cost category. Outside services decreased by $12,848 due to lower demand for third-party repair and maintenance services. Insurance expense decreased by $12,223 due to lower premiums for auto, health and workers’ compensation insurance. Equipment rental costs decreased by $9,937 due primarily to lower costs on the Pike lease during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company leased the surface pumping unit and a crude oil storage tank for the new 1-H well that was drilled in the first quarter of 2011.

 

Inventory change increased operating expenses by $12,131 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and decreased operating expenses by $10,336 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As a result, operating expenses increased by $22,467 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared with the same period of 2011. The decrease in inventory at September 30, 2012 of $12,131 is due primarily to lower inventory volumes at September 30, 2012 offset by higher average per unit values. The increase in inventory at September 30, 2011 of $10,336 is due primarily to higher average per barrel inventory valuations offset by lower inventory volumes.

 

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

 

General and administrative expenses decreased by $33,571 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 when compared with the same period for 2011. Accounting services decreased by $47,404 due to lower audit fees and lower fees paid to a third-party individual who has assisted with the training and implementation of a new oil and gas accounting software that was effective January 1, 2011. Legal fees declined by $19,337 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due primarily to the filing of a Form S-8 during 2011. The legal fees expended for the filing of the Form S-8 during 2011 were $17,500. Outside services increased by $10,417 due primarily to the hiring of temporary help for the corporate office staff. General expenses increased by $8,000 due to a donation the Company made during the second quarter of 2012 to a local medical facility. General liability insurance increased by $6,973 due to an increase in the allocation of insurance costs to general and administrative expense from operating expenses during 2012. The remaining net increase in general and administrative costs of $7,780 is attributable to many different cost categories, none of them significant in amount.

 

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

 

Effective June 2, 2011, the Company’s board of directors approved the issuance of options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company’s two outside directors. These options vest immediately and must be exercised within ninety days after the director leaves office. The Company recorded $43,743 in stock based compensation during the third quarter of 2011, based on a valuation performed using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

 

PROVISION FOR DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

 

The provision for depletion, depreciation and amortization decreased by $76,235 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared with the same period for 2011. The amortization of Texas leaseholds decreased by approximately $48,000 during 2012. The Texas leaseholds were fully amortized as of June 30, 2011. Depletion of oil and gas properties decreased by $25,613 due primarily to a decline in the volume of oil and gas sales.

 

18
 

 

VALUATION ALLOWANCES

 

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $673,000 against the costs of drilling the Pike 1-H well. The Pike 1-H was drilled in the first quarter of 2011 and did not respond favorably to efforts by the Company to stimulate production from the well.

 

On March 21, 2011, the Company participated in the drilling of a joint venture well in Menard County, Texas. Log analysis of this well indicated that the well would not be commercially viable, and was plugged and abandoned. The Company owned a 30% interest in the joint venture. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $54,384 against the costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011 for the drilling of this well.

 

There have been no valuation allowances recorded in 2012.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $819,966 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, operating activities provided cash of $1,745,498. Cash was used for capital spending of $848,952 and principal payments on long-term debt of $48,634. See the Statements of Cash Flows for additional detailed information. The Company had available a line of credit of $500,000 and short-term and long-term investments of $3,228,310 at September 30, 2012 that provided additional liquidity during the first nine months of 2012.

 

IMPACT OF CHANGING PRICES

 

The Company’s revenue is affected by crude oil prices paid by the major oil companies. Average crude oil prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $2.76 per equivalent barrel when compared with the same period of 2011. The Company cannot predict the future course of crude oil prices.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Not Applicable

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

19
 

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. - Legal Proceedings

 

None

 

Item 1A. - Risk Factors

 

See the risk factors that are included in the Company's Annual Report on

Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

 

Item 2. - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None

 

Item 3. - Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None

 

Item 4. - Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None

 

Item 5. - Other Information

 

None

 

Item 6. - Exhibits

 

31.1 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Executive Officer under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15-d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.2 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Financial Officer under Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15-d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.1 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Executive Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.2 - Certification of the Registrant's Principal Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

101.INS   XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

 

20
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  PYRAMID OIL COMPANY
  (registrant)
   
Dated:  November 14, 2012 JOHN H. ALEXANDER
  John H. Alexander
  President
   
Dated:  November 14, 2012 LEE G. CHRISTIANSON
  Lee G. Christianson
  Chief Financial Officer

 

21