kaiform10q2q2009.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
____________________________________________________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended July 4,
2009
|
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ________ to
_________
|
Commission
file number 1-11406
KADANT
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
52-1762325
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
One
Technology Park Drive
|
|
|
Westford,
Massachusetts
|
|
01886
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (978) 776-2000
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at August 5, 2009
|
|
|
Common
Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
12,269,997
|
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 – Financial
Statements
KADANT
INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
Assets
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
January
3,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$ |
27,066 |
|
|
$ |
40,139 |
|
Accounts receivable, less
allowances of $2,481 and $2,985
|
|
|
35,557 |
|
|
|
54,517 |
|
Inventories (Note
4)
|
|
|
42,066 |
|
|
|
55,762 |
|
Unbilled contract costs and
fees
|
|
|
10,909 |
|
|
|
9,631 |
|
Other current
assets
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
16,434 |
|
Assets of discontinued
operation
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
125,089 |
|
|
|
177,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment, at Cost
|
|
|
103,458 |
|
|
|
103,225 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
61,963 |
|
|
|
61,587 |
|
|
|
|
41,495 |
|
|
|
41,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
43,470 |
|
|
|
43,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
96,749 |
|
|
|
95,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
306,803 |
|
|
$ |
356,917 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
KADANT
INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet (continued)
(Unaudited)
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Investment
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
January
3,
|
|
(In
thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term obligations and
current maturities of long-term obligations (Note 6)
|
|
$ |
4,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
14,543 |
|
|
|
24,212 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee
benefits
|
|
|
9,637 |
|
|
|
14,475 |
|
Customer
deposits
|
|
|
7,492 |
|
|
|
11,747 |
|
Other current
liabilities
|
|
|
23,096 |
|
|
|
22,840 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued
operation
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
61,213 |
|
|
|
78,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
27,619 |
|
|
|
31,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Obligations (Note 6)
|
|
|
25,346 |
|
|
|
52,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value,
5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Common stock, $.01 par value,
150,000,000 shares authorized;
14,624,159 shares
issued
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Capital in excess of par
value
|
|
|
93,969 |
|
|
|
92,916 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
148,464 |
|
|
|
152,548 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 2,354,162
and 2,074,362 shares
|
|
|
(49,388 |
) |
|
|
(46,707 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive
items (Note 2)
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
(6,188 |
) |
Total
Kadant Shareholders’ Investment
|
|
|
191,078 |
|
|
|
192,715 |
|
Noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Total
Shareholders’ Investment
|
|
|
192,625 |
|
|
|
194,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Investment
|
|
$ |
306,803 |
|
|
$ |
356,917 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
50,132 |
|
|
$ |
92,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues
|
|
|
29,348 |
|
|
|
53,843 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
19,248 |
|
|
|
26,924 |
|
Research and development
expenses
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
Restructuring
costs
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
51,331 |
|
|
|
82,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax (Benefit)
Provision
|
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
10,013 |
|
Income
Tax (Benefit) Provision
|
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(1,216 |
) |
|
|
7,036 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation (net of income tax benefit of $2 and
$2)
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
7,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income Attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
(1,193 |
) |
|
$ |
6,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
Attributable to Kadant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
(1,188 |
) |
|
$ |
6,893 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net
(Loss) Income Attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
(1,193 |
) |
|
$ |
6,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations Attributable to Kadant (Note
3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Earnings per Share Attributable to Kadant (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
|
13,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
|
13,822 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
115,089 |
|
|
$ |
178,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues
|
|
|
69,665 |
|
|
|
105,647 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
41,453 |
|
|
|
52,293 |
|
Research and development
expenses
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
Restructuring costs and other
income, net
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
|
116,080 |
|
|
|
160,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
17,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
|
|
17,515 |
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
|
|
12,250 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation (net of income tax benefit of $5 and
$5)
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(4,087 |
) |
|
|
12,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income Attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
(4,084 |
) |
|
$ |
12,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
Attributable to Kadant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
(4,075 |
) |
|
$ |
12,010 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net
(Loss) Income Attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
(4,084 |
) |
|
$ |
12,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations Attributable to Kadant (Note
3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Earnings per Share Attributable to Kadant (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares (Note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
13,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
14,048 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
(4,084 |
) |
|
$ |
12,001 |
|
Net
(loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
240 |
|
Loss
from discontinued operation
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(4,078 |
) |
|
|
12,250 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile (loss)
income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
Stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
Provision for losses on
accounts receivable
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Gain on the sale of property,
plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,595 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Changes in current accounts,
net of effects of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
Unbilled contract costs and
fees
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
8,314 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13,769 |
|
|
|
(8,704 |
) |
Other current
assets
|
|
|
7,176 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
(9,593 |
) |
|
|
2,270 |
|
Other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(9,282 |
) |
|
|
(4,124 |
) |
Net cash provided by continuing
operations
|
|
|
18,587 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
discontinued operation
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
18,592 |
|
|
|
10,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant,
and equipment
|
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,149 |
) |
Acquisition
consideration
|
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property,
plant, and equipment
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Net cash used in continuing
operations for investing activities
|
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
|
|
(4,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of
long-term obligations
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
Repayments of long-term
obligations
|
|
|
(45,035 |
) |
|
|
(35,099 |
) |
Purchases of Company common
stock
|
|
|
(3,722 |
) |
|
|
(18,855 |
) |
Proceeds from issuances of
Company common stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(609 |
) |
Net cash used in continuing
operations for financing activities
|
|
|
(29,752 |
) |
|
|
(16,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
Rate Effect on Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in Cash from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(13,073 |
) |
|
|
(7,665 |
) |
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
40,139 |
|
|
|
61,553 |
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$ |
27,066 |
|
|
$ |
53,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of Company common stock
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The interim condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes presented have been prepared by Kadant
Inc. (also referred to in this document as “we,” “Kadant,” “the Company,” or
“the Registrant”), are unaudited, and, in the opinion of management, reflect all
adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the
Company’s financial position at July 4, 2009, and its results of operations for
the three- and six-month periods ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008 and cash
flows for the six-month periods ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The condensed consolidated balance
sheet presented as of January 3, 2009, has been derived from
the consolidated financial statements that have been audited by the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented as permitted
by Form 10-Q and do not contain certain information included in the annual
consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company. The
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10,
2009.
Certain prior-period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation, including the adoption of a
new accounting standard. See Note 16 for further information.
The Company has evaluated all
subsequent events through August 12, 2009, the date these financial statements
were issued.
2.
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
attributable to Kadant combines net (loss) income, other comprehensive items,
and comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. Other
comprehensive items represent certain amounts that are reported as components of
shareholders’ investment in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheet, including foreign currency translation adjustments, deferred gains and
losses and unrecognized prior service loss associated with pension and other
post-retirement plans, and deferred gains and losses on hedging instruments. The
components of comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Kadant are
as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
$ |
(1,221 |
) |
|
$ |
7,031 |
|
|
$ |
(4,087 |
) |
|
$ |
12,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Comprehensive Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
7,895 |
|
Pension
and Other Post-Retirement Liability Adjustments, net (net of income tax of
$97 and $118 in the three and six months ended July 4, 2009, respectively,
and $62 and $116 in the three and six months ended June 28, 2008,
respectively)
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Deferred
Gain on Hedging Instruments (net of income tax of $49 and ($49) in
both the three and six months ended July
4, 2009, respectively, and $297 and $358 in the three and six months
ended June 28, 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
8,335 |
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
7,229 |
|
|
|
7,349 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,576 |
|
Comprehensive
Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) Attributable to Kadant
|
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
7,209 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
20,210 |
|
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3.
|
(Loss)
Earnings per Share
|
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per
share are calculated as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
Attributable to Kadant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
(1,188 |
) |
|
$ |
6,893 |
|
|
$ |
(4,075 |
) |
|
$ |
12,010 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
$ |
(1,193 |
) |
|
$ |
6,888 |
|
|
$ |
(4,084 |
) |
|
$ |
12,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
Weighted Average Shares
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
|
13,703 |
|
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
13,935 |
|
Effect
of Stock Options, Restricted Stock Units and Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Diluted
Weighted Average Shares
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
|
13,822 |
|
|
|
12,386 |
|
|
|
14,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
(Loss) Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
Operations
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
Discontinued
Operation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net (Loss)
Income
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
(Loss) Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
Operations
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
Discontinued
Operation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net (Loss)
Income
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
$ |
.50 |
|
|
$ |
(.33 |
) |
|
$ |
.85 |
|
Options to purchase approximately
41,200 and 54,800 shares of our common stock for the second quarters of 2009 and
2008, respectively, and 58,500 and 55,100 shares of our common stock for the
first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices
were greater than the average market price for the common stock and the effect
of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, the dilutive
effect of restricted stock units totaling 63,400 and 38,300 shares of common
stock was not included in the computation of diluted (loss) earnings per share
in the three- and six-month periods ended July 4, 2009, respectively, as the
effect would have been anti-dilutive.
The components of inventories are as
follows:
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
January
3,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Raw
Materials and Supplies
|
|
$ |
18,859 |
|
|
$ |
21,687 |
|
Work
in Process
|
|
|
6,877 |
|
|
|
16,230 |
|
Finished
Goods
|
|
|
16,330 |
|
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
$ |
42,066 |
|
|
$ |
55,762 |
|
KADANT INC.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The provision for income taxes was
$2,066,000 and $5,265,000 in the first six months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The provision for income taxes in the first six months of 2009
included income tax expense of $1,216,000 associated primarily with earnings
from the Company’s foreign operations and income tax expense of $850,000
associated with applying a valuation allowance to certain foreign deferred tax
assets. The effective tax rate of (103)% in the first six months of 2009 is
primarily due to the valuation allowance we established in the first six months
of 2009 for certain foreign deferred tax assets; and the tax impact of the full
valuation allowance we established for certain U.S. deferred tax assets as a
result of our accumulated loss position in the U.S. and the uncertainty of
profitability in future periods. Our effective tax rate in future periods will
be impacted by the geographic distribution of earnings.
6.
|
Short-
and Long-Term Obligations
|
Short-
and Long-term Obligations
Short- and Long-term obligations are as
follows:
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
January
3,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
38,000 |
|
Variable
Rate Term Loan, due from 2009 to 2016
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
Variable
Rate Term Loan, due from 2010 to 2011
|
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
5,872 |
|
Short-Term
Obligation under Kadant Jining Credit Facilities
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
Total
Short- and Long-Term Obligations
|
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
55,411 |
|
Less:
Short-Term Obligations and Current Maturities
|
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
(3,289 |
) |
Long-Term
Obligations, less Current Maturities
|
|
$ |
25,346 |
|
|
$ |
52,122 |
|
The weighted average interest rate for
long-term obligations was 4.95% as of July 4, 2009.
Revolving
Credit Facility
On February 13, 2008, the Company
entered into a five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (2008 Credit
Agreement) in the aggregate principal amount of up to $75,000,000, which
includes an uncommitted unsecured incremental borrowing facility of up to an
additional $75,000,000. The Company can borrow up to $75,000,000 under the 2008
Credit Agreement with a sublimit of $60,000,000 within the 2008 Credit Agreement
available for the issuances of letters of credit and bank guarantees. The
principal on any borrowings made under the 2008 Credit Agreement is due on
February 13, 2013. As of July 4, 2009, the outstanding balance on the 2008
Credit Agreement was $15,000,000 and the Company had $53,205,000 of borrowing
capacity available under the committed portion of the 2008 Credit
Agreement.
The obligations of the Company under
the 2008 Credit Agreement may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of
default under the 2008 Credit Agreement, which includes customary events of
default including without limitation payment defaults, defaults in the
performance of affirmative and negative covenants, the inaccuracy of
representations or warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency related defaults,
defaults relating to such matters as the Employment Retirement Income Security
Act (ERISA),
uninsured judgments and the failure to pay certain indebtedness, and a change of
control default.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6.
|
Short-
and Long-Term Obligations
(continued)
|
The 2008
Credit Agreement contains negative covenants applicable to the Company and its
subsidiaries, including financial covenants requiring the Company to comply with
a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.5 and a minimum consolidated fixed
charge coverage ratio of 1.2, and restrictions on liens, indebtedness,
fundamental changes, dispositions of property, making certain restricted
payments (including dividends and stock repurchases), investments, transactions
with affiliates, sale and leaseback transactions, swap agreements, changing its
fiscal year, arrangements affecting subsidiary distributions, entering into new
lines of business, and certain actions related to the discontinued operation. As
of July 4, 2009, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. Our
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as
defined in the 2008 Credit Agreement, is a factor used in the consolidated
leverage and fixed charge ratios. The Company expects to stay in compliance with
these financial covenants during the remainder of 2009; however, this is largely
dependent on its ability to meet its EBITDA targets and take other potential
actions, such as repaying a portion of its debt obligations, as needed
to stay in compliance with the covenants. In addition, the Company may seek to
renegotiate certain terms of its 2008 Credit Agreement or seek waivers from
compliance with these financial covenants, both of which could result in
increased borrowing costs and fees.
Commercial
Real Estate Loan
On
May 4, 2006, the Company borrowed $10,000,000 under a promissory note (2006
Commercial Real Estate Loan), which is repayable in quarterly installments of
$125,000 over a ten-year period with the remaining principal balance of
$5,000,000 due upon maturity. As of July 4, 2009, the remaining balance on the
2006 Commercial Real Estate Loan was $8,500,000.
The
Company’s obligations under the 2006 Commercial Real Estate Loan may be
accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default under the 2006 Commercial
Real Estate Loan and the related Mortgage and Security Agreements, which include
customary events of default including without limitation payment defaults,
defaults in the performance of covenants and obligations, the inaccuracy of
representations or warranties, bankruptcy- and insolvency-related defaults,
liens on the properties or collateral and uninsured judgments. In addition, the
occurrence of an event of default under the 2008 Credit Agreement or any
successor credit facility would be an event of default under the 2006 Commercial
Real Estate Loan.
Kadant
Jining Loan and Credit Facilities
On
January 28, 2008, the Company’s Kadant Jining subsidiary (Kadant Jining)
borrowed 40 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately $5,864,000 at the July 4,
2009 exchange rate (2008 Kadant Jining Loan). Principal on the 2008 Kadant
Jining Loan is due as follows: 24 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately
$3,518,000, on January 28, 2010 and 16 million Chinese renminbi, or
approximately $2,346,000, on January 28, 2011.
On
July 30, 2008, Kadant Jining and the Company’s Kadant Yanzhou subsidiary
(Kadant Yanzhou) each entered into a short-term credit line facility agreement
(2008 Facilities) that would allow Kadant Jining to borrow up to an aggregate
principal amount of 45 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately
$6,597,000 at the July 4, 2009 exchange rate, and Kadant Yanzhou to borrow up to
an aggregate principal amount of 15 million Chinese renminbi, or
approximately $2,199,000 Facilities at the July 4, 2009 exchange rate.
The 2008 Facilities have a term of 364 days and are renewable annually on or
before July 30 at the discretion of the lender. As of July 4, 2009, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the 2008 Facilities.
KADANT
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The Company provides for the estimated
cost of product warranties at the time of sale based on the actual historical
return rates and repair costs. In the Pulp and Papermaking Systems (Papermaking
Systems) segment, the Company typically negotiates the terms regarding warranty
coverage and length of warranty depending on the products and applications.
While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes,
the Company’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, repair
costs, service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure, and
supplier warranties on parts delivered to the Company. Should actual product
failure rates, repair costs, service delivery costs, or supplier warranties on
parts differ from the Company’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty
liability would be required.
The changes in the carrying amount of
the Company’s product warranties included in other current liabilities in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
|
|
Six
Months
Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
July
4, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at Beginning of Period
|
|
$ |
3,671 |
|
Provision (income) charged to
expense
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
Usage
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
Currency
translation
|
|
|
22 |
|
Balance
at End of Period
|
|
$ |
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 17 for warranty information
related to the discontinued operation.
8.
|
Restructuring
Costs and Other Income, Net
|
2008
Restructuring Plan
In 2008, the Company initiated a 2008
Restructuring Plan that consisted of severance and associated costs related to
the reduction of 329 full-time positions in China, North America, Latin America,
and Europe, all at its Papermaking Systems segment. These actions were taken to
adjust the Company’s cost structure and streamline its operations in response to
the weak economic environment, which accelerated in the fourth quarter of 2008,
and its negative impact on current and projected order volumes, especially in
its stock-preparation equipment product line. The Company recorded additional
restructuring costs, which consisted of severance and associated costs of
$157,000, in the first six months of 2009 associated with its 2008 Restructuring
Plan.
2009
Restructuring Plan
The Company recorded restructuring
costs of $1,613,000 in the first six months of 2009 associated with its 2009
Restructuring Plan, which consisted of severance and associated costs related to
the reduction of 78 full-time positions in China, the U.S., and Europe, all at
its Papermaking Systems segment. These actions were taken to adjust the
Company’s cost structure and streamline its operations in response to the
continued weak economic environment.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
8.
|
Restructuring
Costs and Other Income,
Net (continued)
|
A summary of the changes in accrued
restructuring costs, of which $1,809,000 is included in other current
liabilities and $551,000 is included in other long-term liabilities as of July
4, 2009 in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, is
as
follows:
(In
thousands)
|
|
Severance
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
Restructuring Plan
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3,
2009
|
|
$ |
2,872 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
34 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
Currency
translation
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Balance at April 4,
2009
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
123 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
Currency
translation
|
|
|
5 |
|
Balance at July 4,
2009
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
Restructuring Plan
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 3,
2009
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Provision
|
|
|
723 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(380 |
) |
Currency
translation
|
|
|
4 |
|
Balance at April 4,
2009
|
|
|
347 |
|
Provision
|
|
|
890 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(842 |
) |
Currency
translation
|
|
|
17 |
|
Balance at July 4,
2009
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
The
Company expects to pay the remaining accrued restructuring costs as follows:
$1,809,000 in 2009 and $551,000 from 2010 to 2015.
Other
Income
In the first
quarter of 2008, the Company sold real estate in France for $746,000, resulting
in a pre-tax gain of $594,000 on the sale.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
9.
|
Business
Segment Information
|
The Company has combined its operating
entities into one reportable operating segment, Papermaking Systems, and a
separate product line, Fiber-based Products, which is reported in Other. In
classifying operational entities into a particular segment, the Company
aggregated businesses with similar economic characteristics, products and
services, production processes, customers, and methods of
distribution.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
$ |
47,995 |
|
|
$ |
90,453 |
|
|
$ |
109,982 |
|
|
$ |
173,711 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
$ |
50,132 |
|
|
$ |
92,406 |
|
|
$ |
115,089 |
|
|
$ |
178,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations Before
Income
Tax (Benefit) Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
14,740 |
|
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
|
$ |
25,618 |
|
Corporate and Other
(a)
|
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
(4,598 |
) |
|
|
(4,573 |
) |
|
|
(7,920 |
) |
Total Operating (Loss)
Income
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
17,698 |
|
Interest Expense,
Net
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1,614 |
) |
|
$ |
10,013 |
|
|
$ |
(2,012 |
) |
|
$ |
17,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,855 |
|
|
$ |
2,707 |
|
Corporate and
Other
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
$ |
3,149 |
|
(a)
|
Corporate
primarily includes general and administrative
expenses.
|
10.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Restricted
Stock Units
On March 4, 2009, the Company
granted an aggregate of 20,000 restricted stock units (RSUs) to its outside
directors with an aggregate fair value of $157,000, which will vest at a rate of
5,000 shares per quarter on the last day of each quarter in 2009. On
March 4, 2009, the Company also granted to its outside directors an
aggregate of 40,000 RSUs with an aggregate fair value of $314,000, which will
only vest and compensation expense will only be recognized upon a change in
control as defined in the Company’s 2006 equity incentive plan. The 40,000 RSUs
will be forfeited if a change in control does not occur prior to the end of the
first quarter of 2010.
Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Units
On March 3, 2009, the Company
granted to certain officers of the Company performance-based RSUs, which
represent, in aggregate, the right to receive 92,500 shares (the target RSU
amount), subject to adjustment, with a grant date fair value of $8.47 per share.
The RSUs will cliff vest in their entirety on the last day of the Company’s 2011
fiscal year, provided that certain performance criteria are met and the officer
remains employed by the Company through the vesting date. The target RSU amount
is subject to adjustment based on the achievement of a specified EBITDA target
generated from continuing operations for the 2009 fiscal year and is forfeited
is actual EBITDA is below 50% of the target EBITDA for the 2009 fiscal year. As
of July 4, 2009, no compensation expense had been recognized related to these
RSUs as the Company does not anticipate that the performance criteria will be
met.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
10.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (continued)
|
The performance-based RSU agreements
provide for forfeiture in certain events, such as voluntary or involuntary
termination of employment, and for acceleration of vesting in certain events,
such as death, disability or a change in control of the Company. If the officer
dies or is disabled prior to the vesting date, then a ratable portion of the
RSUs will vest. If a change in control occurs prior to the end of the
performance period, the officer will receive the target RSU amount; otherwise,
the officer will receive the number of deliverable RSUs based on the achievement
of the performance goal, as stated in the RSU agreements.
Each performance-based RSU represents
the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting. The
Company recognizes compensation expense associated with performance-based RSUs
ratably over the vesting period based on the grant date fair value. Compensation
expense of $441,000 and $566,000 was recognized in the second quarters of 2009
and 2008, respectively, and $931,000 and $986,000 was recognized in the first
six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, associated with performance-based
RSUs granted prior to 2009. Unrecognized compensation expense related to the
unvested performance-based RSUs totaled approximately $1,350,000 at July 4,
2009, and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0
years.
Time-Based
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted time-based RSUs in
prior periods to certain employees of the Company. Each time-based RSU
represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon
vesting. The Company is recognizing compensation expense associated with these
time-based RSUs ratably over the vesting period based on the grant date fair
value. Compensation expense of $124,000 and $127,000 was recognized in the
second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $230,000 and $240,000 was
recognized in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, associated
with time-based RSUs. Unrecognized compensation expense related to the
time-based RSUs totaled approximately $982,000 as of July 4, 2009, and will be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.
A summary of the changes in the
Company’s unvested RSUs for the six months ended July 4, 2009 is as
follows:
|
|
Units
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested RSUs
at January 3, 2009
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
$ |
27.05 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
$ |
8.23 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
Forfeited
/ Expired
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
24.53 |
|
Unvested RSUs
at July 4, 2009
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
$ |
20.53 |
|
11.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans and Post-Retirement Welfare Benefits Plans
The Company’s Kadant Web Systems
subsidiary has a noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan. Benefits under
the plan are based on years of service and employee compensation. Funds are
contributed to a trustee as necessary to provide for current service and for any
unfunded projected benefit obligation over a reasonable period. Effective
December 31, 2005, this plan was closed to new participants. This same
subsidiary also has a post-retirement welfare benefits plan (included in the
table below in “Other Benefits”). No future retirees are eligible for this
post-retirement welfare benefits plan.
The Company’s Kadant Lamort subsidiary
sponsors a defined benefit pension plan (included in the table below in “Other
Benefits”). Benefits under this plan are based on years of service and projected
employee compensation.
The
Company’s Kadant Johnson subsidiary also offers a post-retirement welfare
benefits plan (included in the table below in “Other Benefits”) to its U.S.
employees upon attainment of eligible retirement age. This plan will be closed
to employees who will not meet its retirement eligibility requirements on
January 1, 2012.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans (continued)
|
The components of the net periodic
benefit cost (income) for the pension benefits and other benefits plans in the
three-and six-month periods ended July 4, 2009 and June 28, 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
July
4, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
|
Pension
Benefits
|
|
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Recognized net actuarial
loss
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Amortization of prior service
cost (income)
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
Net
periodic benefit cost (income)
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(income) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
Expected
long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
– |
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
July
4, 2009
|
|
|
June
28, 2008
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
|
Pension
Benefits
|
|
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components
of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Recognized net actuarial
loss
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Amortization of prior service
cost (income)
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
Net
periodic benefit cost (income)
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
(227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(income) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
Expected
long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
– |
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
The Company recognized a curtailment
gain of $278,000 in the three-month period ending July 4, 2009 associated with
the reduction of 11 full-time positions in the U.S.
The Company made cash contributions of
$2,400,000 to the Kadant Web Systems noncontributory defined benefit retirement
plan in the first six months of 2009 and expects to make cash contributions of
$1,200,000 per quarter over the remainder of 2009. For the remaining pension and
post-retirement welfare benefits plans, no cash contributions other than the
funding of current benefit payments are expected in 2009.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The Company uses derivative instruments
primarily to reduce its exposure to currency exchange and interest rate risk.
The Company accounts for such instruments in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133), as amended. When the Company
enters into a derivative contract, it makes a determination as to whether the
transaction is deemed to be a hedge for accounting purposes. For a contract
deemed to be a hedge, the Company formally documents the relationship between
the derivative instrument and the risk being hedged. In this documentation, the
Company specifically identifies the asset, liability, forecasted transaction,
cash flow, or net investment that has been designated as the hedged item, and
evaluates whether the derivative instrument is expected to reduce the risks
associated with the hedged item. To the extent these criteria are not met, the
Company does not use hedge accounting for the derivative instrument. The changes
in the fair value of a derivative not deemed to be a hedge are recorded
currently in earnings. The Company does not hold or engage in transactions
involving derivative instruments for purposes other than risk
management.
Interest
Rate Swaps
The Company entered into interest rate
swap agreements in 2008 and 2006 to hedge its exposure to variable-rate debt and
has designated these agreements as cash flow hedges. On February 13, 2008, the
Company entered into a swap agreement (2008 Swap Agreement) to hedge the
exposure to movements in the 3-month LIBOR rate on future outstanding debt. The
2008 Swap Agreement has a five-year term and a $15,000,000 notional value, which
decreases to $10,000,000 on December 31, 2010, and $5,000,000 on December 30,
2011. Under the 2008 Swap Agreement, on a quarterly basis the Company receives a
3-month LIBOR rate and pays a fixed rate of interest of 3.265% plus the
applicable margin. The Company entered into a swap agreement in 2006 (the 2006
Swap Agreement) to convert a portion of the Company’s outstanding debt from
floating to fixed rates of interest. The swap agreement has the same terms and
quarterly payment dates as the corresponding debt, and reduces proportionately
in line with the amortization of the debt. Under the 2006 Swap Agreement, the
Company will receive a three-month LIBOR rate and pay a fixed rate of interest
of 5.63%. The fair values for these instruments as of July 4, 2009 are included
in other liabilities, with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive items
(net of tax) in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The
Company has structured these interest rate swap agreements to be 100% effective
and as a result, there is no current impact to earnings resulting from hedge
ineffectiveness. Management believes that any credit risk associated with the
swap agreements is remote based on the creditworthiness of the financial
institution issuing the swap agreements.
The counterparty to the swap agreement
could demand an early termination of the swap agreement if the Company is in
default under the 2008 Credit Agreement, or any agreement that amends or
replaces the 2008 Credit Agreement in which the counterparty is a member, and
the Company is unable to cure the default. An event of default under the 2008
Credit Agreement includes customary events of default and failure to comply with
financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.5 and
a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.2. The unrealized gain
(loss) represents the estimated amount that the Company would receive (pay) to
the counterparty in the event of an early termination.
Forward
Currency-Exchange Contracts
The Company uses forward
currency-exchange contracts primarily to hedge exposures resulting from
fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Such exposures primarily result from
portions of the Company’s operations and assets and liabilities that are
denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of the businesses
conducting the operations or holding the assets and liabilities. The Company
typically manages its level of exposure to the risk of currency-exchange
fluctuations by hedging a portion of its currency exposures anticipated over the
ensuing 12-month period, using forward currency-exchange contracts that have
maturities of 12 months or less.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12. Derivatives
(continued)
Forward currency-exchange contracts
that hedge forecasted accounts receivable or accounts payable are designated as
cash flow hedges. The fair values for these instruments are included in other
current assets for unrecognized gains and in other current liabilities for
unrecognized losses, with an offset in accumulated other comprehensive items
(net of tax). For forward currency-exchange contracts that are designated as
fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting
loss or gain on the hedged item are recognized currently in earnings. The fair
values of forward currency-exchange contracts that are not designated as a hedge
are recorded currently in earnings. The Company recognized a gain of $57,000 and
a loss of $550,000 in the three- and six-month periods ending July 4, 2009,
respectively, included in selling, general, and administrative expenses
associated with forward currency-exchange contracts that were not designated as
a hedge.
The following
table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments
designated and not designated as hedging instruments, the notional values of the
associated derivative contracts, and the location of these instruments in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of July 4, 2009:
(In
thousands)
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Asset
(Liability)
|
|
|
Notional
Amount (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
Designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
in an Asset Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
currency-exchange contracts
|
Other
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
3,695 |
|
Derivatives
in a Liability Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swap agreements
|
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
$ |
(1,756 |
) |
|
$ |
23,500 |
|
|
|
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|
Derivatives
in a Liability Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
currency-exchange contracts
|
Other
Current Liabilities
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The
total notional amount is indicative of the level of the Company’s derivative
activity during the second quarter of 2009.
The following table summarizes the
activity in accumulated other comprehensive items (OCI) associated with the
Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges as of and for
the period ended July 4, 2009:
(In
thousands)
|
|
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
|
|
|
Forward
Currency-Exchange Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Unrealized
loss (gain), net of tax, at January 3, 2009
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
1,649 |
|
(Loss)
Gain Reclassified to Earnings (a)
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
Gain
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Unrealized
loss (gain), net of tax, at July 4, 2009
|
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
Included in interest expense for interest rate swap agreements and in
revenues for forward currency-exchange contracts in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
|
|
As of July 4, 2009, $538,000 of the net
unrealized loss included in OCI is expected to be reclassified to earnings over
the next twelve months .
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
13.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (SFAS 157) defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into
three broad levels as follows:
|
•
|
Level
1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level
2—Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are
observable either directly or
indirectly.
|
|
•
|
Level
3—Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own
assumptions.
|
The following table presents the fair
value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of July 4, 2009:
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
(In
thousands) |
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
currency-exchange contracts
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
currency-exchange contracts
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Interest rate
swap agreements
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
The Company uses the market approach
technique to value its financial assets and liabilities, and there were no
changes in valuation techniques during the first six months of 2009. The
Company’s financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value comprise
derivative instruments used to hedge the Company’s foreign currency and interest
rate risks. The fair values of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements are
based on LIBOR yield curves at the reporting date. The fair values of the
Company’s forward currency-exchange contracts are based on quoted forward
foreign exchange prices at the reporting date. The forward currency-exchange
contracts and interest rate swap agreements are hedges of either recorded assets
or liabilities or anticipated transactions. Changes in values of the underlying
hedged assets and liabilities or anticipated transactions are not reflected in
the table above.
Certain of the Company’s contracts,
particularly for stock-preparation and systems orders, require the Company to
provide a standby letter of credit to a customer as beneficiary, limited in
amount to a negotiated percentage of the total contract value, in order to
guarantee warranty and performance obligations of the Company under the
contract. Typically, these standby letters of credit expire without being drawn
by the beneficiary. One of the Company’s customers indicated its intention
to draw upon all outstanding standby letters of credit issued to the customer as
beneficiary to secure warranty and performance obligations under multiple
contracts. The Company believes the attempted draws by the customer in the first
six months of 2009 are for reasons unrelated to the Company’s warranty and
performance obligations and the Company has opposed and intends to continue to
vigorously oppose such actions. As of July 4, 2009, the customer had submitted
draws against standby letters of credit totaling $2,270,000 and the Company has
obtained preliminary injunctions against payment to the customer. The
outstanding standby letters of credit to this customer, including those that the
Company has obtained preliminary injunctions against payment, total $5,845,000.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The Company has been named as a
co-defendant, together with the Company’s Kadant Composites LLC subsidiary
(Composites LLC) and another defendant, in a consumer class action lawsuit filed
in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the
District Court) on December 27, 2007 on behalf of a putative class of
individuals who own GeoDeck™ decking or railing products manufactured by
Composites LLC between April 2002 and October 2003. The complaint in this matter
purports to assert, among other things, causes of action for unfair and
deceptive trade practices, fraud, negligence, breach of warranty and unjust
enrichment, and it seeks compensatory damages and punitive damages under various
state consumer protection statutes. The District Court dismissed the complaint
against all defendants in its entirety on November 19, 2008. The plaintiffs have
appealed the District Court’s dismissal to the U.S. First Circuit Court of
Appeals (Court of Appeals). The Court of Appeals has yet to schedule a hearing
on the plaintiffs’ appeal. The Company intends to defend against this action
vigorously, but there is no assurance the Company will prevail in such defense
or that additional lawsuits asserting similar claims will not be filed against
the Company. The Company could incur significant costs to defend this lawsuit or
similar lawsuits and a judgment or a settlement of such claims could have a
material adverse impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
results. The Company has not made an accrual related to this litigation as it
believes that an adverse outcome is not probable and estimable at this
time.
16.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets” (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures about an
employer’s plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.
This rule expands current disclosures of defined benefit pension and
postretirement plan assets to include information regarding the fair value
measurements of plan assets similar to the Company’s current SFAS 157
disclosures. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
of the adoption of FSP 132(R)-1 on its financial statement
disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments” (FSP 115-2 and 124-2). This FSP amends the other-than-temporary
impairment guidance for certain debt securities and will require the investor to
assess the likelihood of selling the debt security prior to recovery of its cost
basis. If an investor is able to meet the criteria to assert that it does not
intend to sell the debt security and more likely than not will not be required
to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery, impairment charges
related to credit losses would be recognized in earnings whereas impairment
charges related to non-credit losses would be reflected in other comprehensive
income. FSP 115-2 and 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP 115-2 and 124-2 on
July 4, 2009, which had no effect on its condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments” (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP requires the fair value
disclosures required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments,” regarding the fair value of financial instruments to be included
in interim financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 and requires additional disclosure
from that previously required. The Company adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1 in the second quarter of 2009, which had no effect on its condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
16.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
(continued)
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157- 4, "Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (FSP 157- 4). FSP
157- 4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with
SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased. FSP 157- 4 also includes guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP 157- 4 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
The Company adopted FSP 157- 4 in the second quarter of 2009, which had no
effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165). SFAS 165
identifies the following: the period after the balance sheet date during which
management shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under
which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements; and the disclosures that an
entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. The Company adopted SFAS 165 in the second quarter of 2009, which
had no effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (SFAS 168). Upon
its effective date, the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification,” or the
Codification, will become the single source of authoritative nongovernmental
generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP). The Codification is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
adoption of the Codification will have no impact on the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
17.
|
Discontinued
Operation
|
In 2005, Composites LLC sold
substantially all of its assets to LDI Composites Co. (Buyer). Under the terms
of the asset purchase agreement, Composites LLC retained certain liabilities
associated with the operation of the business prior to the sale, including the
warranty obligations associated with products manufactured prior to the sale
date. Composites LLC retained all of the cash proceeds received from the asset
sale and continued to administer and pay warranty claims from the sale proceeds
into the third quarter of 2007. On September 30, 2007, Composites LLC
announced that it no longer had sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was
unable to pay or process warranty claims, and ceased doing business. All
activity related to this business is classified in the results of the
discontinued operation in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Through the sale date of
October 21, 2005, Composites LLC offered a standard limited warranty to the
owner of its decking and roofing products, limited to repair or replacement of
the defective product or a refund of the original purchase price. Composites LLC
records the minimum amount of the potential range of loss for products under
warranty in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”
(SFAS 5). As of July 4, 2009, the accrued warranty costs associated with the
composites business were $2,142,000, which represents the low end of the
estimated range of warranty reserve required based on the level of claims
received. Composites LLC has calculated that the total potential warranty cost
ranges from $2,142,000 to approximately $13,100,000. The high end of the range
represents the estimated maximum level of warranty claims remaining based on the
total sales of the products under warranty. Composites LLC will continue to
record adjustments to the accrued warranty costs to reflect the minimum amount
of the potential range of loss for products under warranty based on judgments
entered against it in litigation, if any.
See Note 15 for information related to
pending litigation associated with the composites business.
Item 2 – Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
includes forward-looking statements that are not statements of historical fact,
and may include statements regarding possible or assumed future results of
operations. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management, using
information currently available to our management. When we use words such as
“believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,”
“estimates,” “should,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” or similar expressions, we are
making forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Our future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in
the forward-looking statements. Many of the important factors that will
determine these results and values are beyond our ability to control or predict.
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. For a
discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ
materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements, you should
read carefully the section captioned “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A, of this
Report.
Overview
Company
Background
We are a leading supplier of equipment
used in the global papermaking and paper recycling industries and are also a
manufacturer of granules made from papermaking byproducts. Our continuing
operations are comprised of one reportable operating segment: Pulp and
Papermaking Systems (Papermaking Systems), and a separate product line,
Fiber-based Products, reported in Other Business. Through our Papermaking
Systems segment, we develop, manufacture, and market a range of equipment and
products for the global papermaking and paper recycling industries. We have a
large customer base that includes most of the world’s major paper manufacturers.
We believe our large installed base provides us with a spare parts and
consumables business that yields higher margins than our capital equipment
business, and which have traditionally been less susceptible to the cyclical
trends in the paper industry.
Through our Fiber-based Products line,
we manufacture and sell granules derived from pulp fiber for use as carriers for
agricultural, home lawn and garden, and professional lawn, turf and ornamental
applications, as well as for oil and grease absorption.
In addition, prior to its sale in 2005,
our Kadant Composites LLC subsidiary (Composites LLC) operated a composite
building products business, which is presented as a discontinued operation in
the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
We were incorporated in Delaware in
November 1991. On July 12, 2001, we changed our name to Kadant Inc. from Thermo
Fibertek Inc. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, where
it trades under the symbol “KAI.”
Papermaking
Systems Segment
Our Papermaking Systems segment designs
and manufactures stock-preparation systems and equipment, fluid-handling systems
and equipment, paper machine accessory equipment, and water-management systems
primarily for the paper and paper recycling industries. Our principal products
include:
|
-
|
Stock-preparation systems and
equipment: custom-engineered systems and equipment, as well as
standard individual components, for pulping, de-inking, screening,
cleaning, and refining recycled and virgin fibers for preparation for
entry into the paper machine during the production of recycled
paper;
|
|
-
|
Fluid handling systems and
equipment: rotary joints, precision unions, steam and condensate
systems, components, and controls used primarily in the dryer section of
the papermaking process and during the production of corrugated boxboard,
metals, plastics, rubber, textiles and
food;
|
|
-
|
Paper machine accessory
equipment: doctoring systems and related consumables that
continuously clean papermaking rolls to keep paper machines running
efficiently; doctor blades made of a variety of materials to perform
functions
|
Overview
(continued)
|
including
cleaning, creping, web removal, and application of coatings; and profiling
systems that control moisture, web curl, and gloss during paper
production; and
|
|
-
|
Water-management systems:
systems and equipment used to continuously clean paper machine
fabrics, drain water from pulp mixtures, form the sheet or web, and
filter the process water for
reuse.
|
Other
Business
Our other business consists of our
Fiber-based Products business that produces biodegradable, absorbent granules
from papermaking byproducts for use primarily as carriers for agricultural, home
lawn and garden, and professional lawn, turf and ornamental applications, as
well as for oil and grease absorption.
Discontinued
Operation
In 2005, Composites LLC sold
substantially all of its assets to LDI Composites Co. Under the terms of the
asset purchase agreement, Composites LLC retained certain liabilities associated
with the operation of the business prior to the sale, including the warranty
obligations associated with products manufactured prior to the sale date.
Composites LLC retained all of the cash proceeds received from the asset sale
and continued to administer and pay warranty claims from the sale proceeds into
the third quarter of 2007. On September 30, 2007, Composites LLC announced
that it no longer had sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was unable to
pay or process warranty claims, and ceased doing business.
Through the sale date of
October 21, 2005, Composites LLC offered a standard limited warranty to the
owners of its decking and roofing products, limited to repair or replacement of
the defective product or a refund of the original purchase price. As of July 4,
2009, the accrued warranty costs associated with the composites business were
$2.1 million, which represents the low end of the estimated range of warranty
reserve required based on the level of claims received. Composites LLC has
calculated that the total potential warranty cost ranges from $2.1 million to
approximately $13.1 million. The high end of the range represents the estimated
maximum level of warranty claims remaining based on the total sales of the
products under warranty. Composites LLC will continue to record adjustments to
accrued warranty costs to reflect the minimum amount of the potential range of
loss for products under warranty based on judgments known to be entered against
it in litigation, if any.
All activity related to this business
is classified in the results of the discontinued operation in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Composites LLC’s inability to pay or
process warranty claims has exposed us to greater risks associated with
litigation. For more information regarding our current litigation arising from
these claims, see Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” and Part II,
Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.
International
Sales
During the first six months of
both 2009 and 2008, approximately 60% of our sales were to customers outside the
United States, principally in Asia and Europe. We generally seek to charge our
customers in the same currency in which our operating costs are incurred.
However, our financial performance and competitive position can be affected by
currency exchange rate fluctuations affecting the relationship between the U.S.
dollar and foreign currencies. We seek to reduce our exposure to currency
fluctuations through the use of forward currency exchange contracts. We may
enter into forward contracts to hedge certain firm purchase and sale commitments
denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies.
These contracts hedge transactions principally denominated in U.S.
dollars.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation
of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of our condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Overview
(continued)
Critical accounting policies are
defined as those that reflect significant judgments and uncertainties, and could
potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions
and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies, upon
which our financial condition depends and which involve the most complex or
subjective decisions or assessments, are those described in “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under
the section captioned “Application of Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates” in Part I, Item 7, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 3, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). There have been no material changes to these critical accounting policies
since fiscal year-end 2008 that warrant disclosure.
Industry
and Business Outlook
Our products are primarily sold to the
global pulp and paper industry. The worldwide economic downturn continues to
negatively impact paper producers. In response to the economic slowdown, paper
producers have taken numerous steps to control operating costs including closing
factories, increasing downtime at paper mills, deferring maintenance and
upgrades, and delaying or canceling projects. Revenues in all of our product
lines within our papermaking systems segment in the first six months of 2009
were negatively impacted, which resulted in a $63.7 million, or 37%,
decrease in revenues in this segment in the first six months of 2009
compared to the first six months of 2008. A significant factor contributing to
this decrease was the slowdown in China, where there is more linerboard capacity
than needed to meet demand. There were also significant declines in North
America, where paper companies have curtailed production, closed mills and shut
down paper machines. In addition, fluid-handling revenues declined
significantly, partly due to lower energy costs.
In response to this difficult
environment, we have taken a number of steps to optimize our business structure
and maximize internal efficiencies, which include integrating multiple
operations in a region, merging our sales teams in certain markets, and reducing
the number of employees in certain locations. In addition, we continue to
concentrate our efforts on several initiatives intended to improve our operating
results, including: increasing aftermarket sales, delivering products and
technical solutions that provide our customers with a good return on their
investments through energy-savings and fiber-yield improvements, penetrating
existing markets where we see opportunity, and increasing our use of low-cost
manufacturing bases. We also continue to focus our efforts on managing our
operating costs, capital expenditures, and working capital.
For 2009, we expect GAAP (generally
accepted accounting principles) revenues and earnings per share from continuing
operations, which exclude the results from our discontinued operation, as
follows: For the third quarter of 2009, we expect to report a diluted loss per
share of $.28 to $.30 from continuing operations, on revenues of $46 to $48
million. This includes $.14 of incremental tax provision and $.04 of estimated
restructuring costs. For 2009, we expect to report a diluted loss per share of
$.60 to $.65 from continuing operations, on revenues of $210 to $220 million,
revised from our previous guidance of diluted loss per share of $.55 to $.65, on
revenues of $220 to $230 million. The full year guidance includes $.37 of
incremental tax provision and $.15 of estimated restructuring costs. The
incremental tax provision is associated with the valuation allowance established
for certain U.S. and foreign deferred tax assets as a result of our cumulative
loss position in the U.S. and certain foreign tax jurisdictions.
Results
of Operations
Second Quarter
2009 Compared With Second
Quarter 2008
The
following table sets forth our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of
operations expressed as a percentage of total revenues from continuing
operations for the second fiscal quarters of 2009 and 2008. The results of
operations for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 4,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Research and development
expenses
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Restructuring
costs
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax (Benefit)
Provision
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Income
Tax (Benefit) Provision
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Revenues
Revenues decreased to $50.1 million in
the second quarter of 2009 from $92.4 million in the second quarter of 2008, a
decrease of $42.3 million, or 46%. Revenues in the second quarter of 2009
include a $4.2 million, or 5%, decrease from the unfavorable effects of
currency translation. Excluding the effects of currency translation, revenues
decreased $38.1 million, or 41%, in the second quarter of 2009 due to a decrease
in revenues in all of our major product lines as our customers continued to take
steps to control operating costs including increasing downtime at paper mills
and delaying or canceling projects. Excluding the effects of currency
translation, the largest revenue declines in the second quarter of 2009 were in
our stock-preparation equipment product line, which decreased $20.0 million, or
54%, and our fluid-handling product line, which decreased $11.5 million, or
41%.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Revenues for the second quarters of
2009 and 2008 from our Papermaking Systems segment and our other businesses are
as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
$ |
47,995 |
|
|
$ |
90,453 |
|
Other Business
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
$ |
50,132 |
|
|
$ |
92,406 |
|
Papermaking Systems Segment. Revenues at the
Papermaking Systems segment decreased to $48.0 million in the second quarter of
2009 from $90.4 million in the second quarter of 2008, a decrease of $42.4
million, or 47%. Revenues in the 2009 period include a $4.2 million, or
5%, decrease from the unfavorable effects of currency
translation.
Other Business. Revenues from the
Fiber-based Products business increased $0.1 million, or 9%, to $2.1 million in
the second quarter of 2009 from $2.0 million in the second quarter of
2008 primarily due to stronger sales of Biodac™, our
line of biodegradable granular products.
The following table presents revenues
at the Papermaking Systems segment by product line, the changes in revenues by
product line between the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, and the changes in
revenues by product line between the second quarters of 2009 and 2008 excluding
the effect of currency translation. The presentation of the changes in revenues
by product line excluding the effect of currency translation is a non-GAAP
measure. We believe this non-GAAP measure helps investors gain a better
understanding of our underlying operations, consistent with how our management
measures and forecasts our performance, especially when comparing such results
to prior periods. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered superior to or
a substitute for the corresponding GAAP measure.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Decrease
Excluding
Effect
of
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
July
4,
2009
|
|
|
June
28,
2008
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
Line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Preparation
Equipment
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
|
$ |
(20.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
Fluid-Handling
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Accessories
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Water-Management
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
90.4 |
|
|
$ |
(42.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(38.2 |
) |
Revenues from the segment’s
stock-preparation equipment product line decreased $20.9 million, or 56%, in the
second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, including a $0.9
million, or 2%, decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency translation.
Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues from the segment’s stock
preparation equipment product line decreased $20.0 million, or 54%, primarily
due to an $8.1 million, or 56%, decrease in stock-preparation equipment sales in
North America, a $7.1 million, or 65%, decrease in stock-preparation equipment
sales in China, and a $4.8 million, or 41%, decrease in stock-preparation
equipment sales in Europe. These significant decreases were due to a reduction
in orders as major manufacturers cancelled or postponed projects due to the
current economic environment. We expect
to continue to see declines in stock-preparation equipment sales in the third
quarter of 2009.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Revenues from the segment’s
fluid-handling product line decreased $12.9 million, or 46%, in the second
quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, including a $1.4
million, or 5%, decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency translation.
Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues from the segment’s
fluid-handling product line decreased $11.5 million, or 41%, primarily due to a
decrease in revenues in Europe, and to a lesser extent, North America and
China, as customers curtailed production and reduced their order
volumes.
Revenues from the segment’s accessories
product line decreased $5.9 million, or 35%, in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the second quarter of 2008, including a $1.3 million, or 7%,
decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency translation. Excluding the
effect of currency translation, revenues from the segment’s accessories product
line decreased $4.6 million, or 28%, primarily due to decreased demand in North
America and Europe due to significantly lower demand in the current economic
environment.
Revenues from the segment’s
water-management product line decreased $2.5 million, or 33%, in the second
quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, including a $0.5
million, or 7%, decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency translation.
Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues from the segment’s water
management product line decreased $2.0 million, or 26%, primarily due to a
decrease in capital sales in North America.
Gross
Profit Margin
Gross profit margins for the second
quarters of 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit Margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Other Business
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Gross profit margin decreased
to 41% in the second quarter of 2009 from 42% in the second quarter of
2008.
Papermaking Systems Segment. The gross profit
margin in the Papermaking Systems segment decreased to 41% in the second
quarter of 2009 from 42% in the second quarter of 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to lower margins in our water-management product line due to the
underabsorption of overhead costs given reduced order volumes. We are in the
process of consolidating our water-management manufacturing facility into our
facilities in Massachusetts and Mexico and we expect to continue to see reduced
margins in this product line until this consolidation is completed in the fourth
quarter of 2009. In addition, an increase in the gross profit margin in our
stock preparation equipment product line due to a more favorable product mix and
cost reductions was offset by decreases in the gross profit margins in our fluid
handling and accessories product lines.
Other Business. The gross profit margin
in our Fiber-based Products business increased to 45% in the second quarter
of 2009 from 29% in the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to the lower cost
of natural gas.
Operating
Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 38% in the second quarter of
2009 from 29% in the second quarter of 2008. Selling, general, and
administrative expenses decreased $7.7 million, or 29%, to $19.2 million in the
second quarter of 2009 from $26.9 million in the second quarter of 2008. This
decrease includes a $1.5 million decrease from the favorable effect of foreign
currency translation and a $6.2 million net decrease primarily due to expense
reductions throughout the Company, including our recent restructuring efforts
that reduced the number of employees and merged our sales forces in certain
markets.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Total stock-based compensation expense
was $0.6 million and $0.8 million in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses
in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of July
4, 2009, unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units was
approximately $2.4 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.4 years.
Research and development expenses
increased $0.2 million to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to
$1.5 million in the second quarter of 2008 and represented 3% and 2% of revenues
in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Restructuring
Costs
We recorded restructuring costs of $1.0
million in the second quarter of 2009, consisting of severance and associated
charges primarily related to the reduction of 35 full-time positions in the
U.S., Europe, and China in the Papermaking Systems segment. We estimate
annualized savings of $1.4 million in cost of revenues and $1.0 million in
selling, general, and administrative expenses from the 2009 restructuring
actions. We expect to incur an additional $1.0 million in restructuring costs
during the remainder of 2009.
Interest
Income
Interest income decreased $0.4 million,
or 82%, to $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 from $0.5 million in
the second quarter of 2008 due to lower average interest rates and, to a
lesser extent, lower average invested balances in the 2009 period.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense decreased $0.1
million, or 21%, to $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 from
$0.6 million in the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to lower average
borrowing rates and to a lesser extent, lower average outstanding borrowings
during the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of
2008.
Income
Tax (Benefit) Provision
Our income tax benefit of $0.4 million
in the second quarter of 2009 was primarily due to tax benefits associated with
our foreign operations.
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
Loss from continuing operations was
$1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to income from
continuing operations of $7.0 million in the second quarter of 2008. The
decrease in the 2009 period was primarily due to a decrease in operating income
of $11.3 million (see Revenues, Gross Profit Margin, and Operating Expenses discussed
above).
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
Loss from the discontinued operation
was $5 thousand in both the second quarters of 2009 and 2008.
As of July 4, 2009, the accrued
warranty costs associated with the composites business were $2.1 million, which
represents the low end of the estimated range of warranty reserve required based
on the level of claims received. Composites LLC has calculated that the total
potential warranty cost ranges from $2.1 million to approximately $13.1 million.
The high end of the range represents the estimated maximum level of warranty
claims remaining based on the total sales of the products under
warranty.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Composites LLC retained all of the cash
proceeds received from the asset sale in October 2005 and continued to
administer and pay warranty claims from the sale proceeds into the third quarter
of 2007. On September 30, 2007, Composites LLC announced that it no longer
had sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was unable to pay or process
warranty claims, and ceased doing business. Composites LLC will continue to
record adjustments to accrued warranty costs to reflect the minimum amount of
the potential range of loss for products under warranty based on judgments
entered against it in litigation. Our consolidated
results in future reporting periods will be negatively impacted if the future
level of warranty claims exceeds the warranty reserve.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets” (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures about an
employer’s plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.
This rule expands current disclosures of defined benefit pension and
postretirement plan assets to include information regarding the fair value
measurements of plan assets similar to our current SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” disclosures. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the
potential impact of the adoption of FSP 132(R)-1 on our financial statement
disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments” (FSP 115-2 and 124-2). This FSP amends the other-than-temporary
impairment guidance for certain debt securities and will require the investor to
assess the likelihood of selling the debt security prior to recovery of its cost
basis. If an investor is able to meet the criteria to assert that it does not
intend to sell the debt security and more likely than not will not be required
to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery, impairment charges
related to credit losses would be recognized in earnings whereas impairment
charges related to non-credit losses would be reflected in other comprehensive
income. FSP 115-2 and 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP 115-2 and 124-2 on July 4,
2009, which had no effect on our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments” (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP requires the fair value
disclosures required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments” regarding the fair value of financial instruments to be included in
interim financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 and requires additional disclosure
from that previously required. We adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 in the
second quarter of 2009, which had no effect on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
157- 4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly" (FSP 157- 4). FSP 157- 4 provides additional guidance for
estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. FSP 157- 4
also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction
is not orderly. FSP 157- 4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP 157- 4 in the second quarter of 2009,
which had no effect on our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165). SFAS 165
identifies the following: the period after the balance sheet date during which
management shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under
which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements; and the disclosures that an
entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. We adopted SFAS 165 in the second quarter of 2009, which had no
effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (SFAS 168). Upon
its effective date, the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification,” or the
Codification, will become the single source of authoritative nongovernmental
generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (GAAP). The Codification is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
adoption of the Codification will have no impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Results
of Operations (continued)
First Six Months
2009 Compared With First Six
Months 2008
The following table sets forth our
unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations expressed as a
percentage of total revenues from continuing operations for the first six months
of 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for the first six months of 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal
year.
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
revenues
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Research and development
expenses
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Restructuring costs and other
income, net
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Revenues
Revenues decreased to $115.1 million in
the first six months of 2009 from $178.3 million in the first six months of
2008, a decrease of $63.2 million, or 35%. Revenues in the first six months
of 2009 include an $11.2 million, or 6%, decrease from the unfavorable
effects of currency translation. Excluding the effects of currency translation,
revenues decreased $52.0 million, or 29%, in the first six months of 2009 due to
a decrease in revenues in all of our major product lines as our customers
continued to take steps to control operating costs including increasing downtime
at paper mills and delaying or canceling projects. Excluding the effects of
currency translation, the largest revenue declines in the first six months of
2009 were in our stock-preparation equipment product line, which decreased $24.2
million, or 33%, and our fluid-handling product line, which decreased $16.3
million, or 32%.
Revenues for the
first six months of 2009 and 2008 from our Papermaking Systems segment and our
other business are as follows:
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
$ |
109,982 |
|
|
$ |
173,711 |
|
Other Business
|
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
4,559 |
|
|
|
$ |
115,089 |
|
|
$ |
178,270 |
|
Results
of Operations (continued)
Papermaking Systems Segment. Revenues at the
Papermaking Systems segment decreased to $110.0 million in the first six months
of 2009 from $173.7 million in the first six months of 2008, a decrease of $63.7
million, or 37%. Revenues in the first six months of 2009 include an $11.2
million, or 6%, decrease from the unfavorable effects of currency
translation.
Other Business. Revenues from our
Fiber-based Products business increased to $5.1 million in the first six
months of 2009 from $4.6 million in the first six months of 2008, an increase of
$0.5 million, or 12%.
The following table presents revenues
at the Papermaking Systems segment by product line, the changes in revenues by
product line between the first six months of 2009 and 2008, and the changes in
revenues by product line between the first six months of 2009 and 2008 excluding
the effect of currency translation. The presentation of the changes in revenues
by product line excluding the effect of currency translation is a non-GAAP
measure. We believe this non-GAAP measure helps investors gain a better
understanding of our underlying operations, consistent with how management
measures and forecasts the Company’s performance, especially when comparing such
results to prior periods. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered
superior to or a substitute for the corresponding GAAP measure.
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
Decrease
Excluding
Effect
of
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
July
4,
2009
|
|
|
June
28,
2008
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Currency
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
Line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Preparation
Equipment
|
|
$ |
45.6 |
|
|
$ |
73.5 |
|
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(24.2 |
) |
Fluid-Handling
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
Accessories
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Water-Management
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
$ |
110.0 |
|
|
$ |
173.7 |
|
|
$ |
(63.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(52.5 |
) |
Revenues from the segment’s
stock-preparation equipment product line decreased $27.9 million, or 38%, in the
first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008, including a
$3.7 million, or 5%, decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency
translation. Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues from
the segment’s stock-preparation equipment line decreased $24.2 million, or 33%,
due primarily to an $18.3 million, or 79%, decrease in stock-preparation
equipment sales in China, and a $13.7 million, or 50%, decrease in
stock-preparation equipment sales in North America. These significant decreases
were due to a reduction in orders as major manufacturers cancelled or postponed
projects due to the current economic environment. Partially
offsetting the decreases in revenues in the first six months of 2009 was an
increase of $7.8 million, or 34%, in stock-preparation equipment sales at our
European operation primarily due to a large capital equipment project in
Vietnam. We expect to continue to see declines in stock-preparation equipment
sales in the third quarter of 2009.
Revenues from the segment’s
fluid-handling product line decreased $19.7 million, or 39%, in the first six
months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008, including a $3.4
million, or 7%, decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency
translation. Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues from the
segment’s fluid-handling product line decreased $16.3
million,
or 32%, due to a decrease in revenues in Europe and, to a lesser
extent, China and North America due to significantly lower demand in the
current economic environment.
Revenues from the segment’s accessories
product line decreased $10.2 million, or 31%, in the first six months of 2009
compared to the first six months of 2008, including a $3.0 million, or 9%,
decrease from the unfavorable effect of currency translation. Excluding the
effect of currency translation, revenues from the segment’s accessories product
line decreased $7.2 million, or 22%, primarily due to decreased demand in North
America and, to a lesser extent, Europe as customers curtailed production
and reduced their order volumes.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Revenues
from the segment’s water-management product line decreased $5.4 million, or 35%,
in the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of
2008, including a $0.8 million, or 6%, decrease from the unfavorable effect
of currency translation. Excluding the effect of currency translation, revenues
from the segment’s water-management product line decreased $4.6 million, or 29%,
primarily due to a decrease in capital sales in North America and
Europe.
Gross
Profit Margin
Gross profit margins for the first six
months of 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July
4,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit Margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papermaking
Systems
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Other Business
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Gross profit margin decreased to 39% in
the first six months of 2009 from 41% in the first six months of
2008.
Papermaking Systems Segment.
The gross profit margin in the Papermaking Systems segment decreased to 40% in
the first six months of 2009 from 41% in the first six months of 2008. This
decrease was primarily due to lower margins in our water-management product line
due to the underabsorption of overhead costs given reduced order volumes. We are
in the process of consolidating our water-management manufacturing facility into
our facilities in Massachusetts and Mexico and we expect to continue to see
reduced margins in this product line until this consolidation is completed in
the fourth quarter of 2009.
Other Business. The gross
profit margin in our Fiber-based Products business increased to 39% in the first
six months of 2009 from 35% in the first six months of 2008, primarily due to
the lower cost of natural gas.
Operating
Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 36% in the first six months of
2009 from 29% in the first six months of 2008. Selling, general, and
administrative expenses decreased $10.8 million, or 21%, to $41.5 million in the
first six months of 2009 from $52.3 million in the first six months of 2008.
This decrease includes a $3.2 million decrease from the favorable effect of
foreign currency translation and a $7.6 million net decrease primarily due to
expense reductions throughout the Company, including our recent restructuring
efforts that reduced the number of employees and merged our sales forces in
certain markets.
Total stock-based compensation expense
was $1.3 million and $1.6 million in the first six months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses
in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of July
4, 2009, unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units was
approximately $2.4 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.4 years.
Research and development expenses
increased $0.1 million to $3.2 million in the first six months of 2009 compared
to $3.1 million in the first six months of 2008 and represented 3% and 2% of
revenues in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Results
of Operations (continued)
Restructuring Costs and Other Income,
Net
We recorded restructuring costs of $1.8
million in the first six months of 2009, consisting of severance and associated
charges primarily related to the reduction of 78 full-time positions in the
U.S., China, and Europe. We expect to incur an additional $1.0 million in
restructuring costs during the remainder of 2009. We recorded net other income
and restructuring costs of $0.5 million in the first six months of 2008. Other
income in 2008 consisted of a pre-tax gain of $0.6 million resulting from the
sale of real estate in France for $0.7 million in cash offset by severance
charges of $0.1 million related to the closure of a facility in Sweden that
resulted in the reduction of 3 full-time positions. All of these items occurred
in the Papermaking Systems segment.
Interest
Income
Interest income decreased $0.8 million,
or 72%, to $0.3 million in the first six months of 2009 from $1.1 million
in the first six months of 2008 due to lower average invested balances and, to a
lesser extent, lower average interest rates in the 2009 period.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $0.1
million, or 7%, to $1.3 million in the first six months of 2009 from
$1.2 million in the first six months of 2008 primarily due to higher average
borrowing rates during the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six
months of 2008.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes in the
first six months of 2009 included a $1.2 million tax provision associated
primarily with earnings from our foreign operations and a $0.9 million tax
provision associated with applying a valuation allowance to certain foreign
deferred tax assets. The effective tax rate of (103)% in the first six months of
2009 is primarily due to the valuation allowance we established in the first six
months of 2009 for certain foreign deferred tax assets; and the tax impact of
the full valuation allowance we established for certain U.S. deferred tax assets
as a result of our accumulated loss position in the U.S. and the uncertainty of
profitability in future periods. Our effective tax rate in future periods will
be impacted by the geographic distribution of earnings.
(Loss)
Income from Continuing Operations
Loss from continuing operations was
$4.1 million in the first six months of 2009 compared to income from
continuing operations of $12.3 million in the first six months of 2008. The
decrease in the 2009 period was primarily due to a decrease in operating income
of $18.7 million (see Revenues, Gross Profit Margin, and Operating Expenses discussed
above).
Loss
from Discontinued Operation
Loss from the discontinued operation
was $9 thousand in both the first six months of 2009 and 2008.
As of July 4, 2009, the accrued
warranty costs associated with the composites business were $2.1 million, which
represents the low end of the estimated range of warranty reserve required based
on the level of claims received. Composites LLC has calculated that the total
potential warranty cost ranges from $2.1 million to approximately $13.1 million.
The high end of the range represents the estimated maximum level of warranty
claims remaining based on the total sales of the products under
warranty.
Composites LLC retained all of the cash
proceeds received from the asset sale in October 2005 and continued to
administer and pay warranty claims from the sale proceeds into the third quarter
of 2007. On September 30, 2007, Composites LLC announced that it no longer
had sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was unable to pay or process
warranty claims, and ceased doing business. Composites LLC will continue to
record adjustments to accrued warranty costs to reflect the minimum amount of
the potential range of loss for products under warranty based on judgments
entered against it in litigation. Our consolidated
results in future reporting periods will be negatively impacted if the future
level of warranty claims exceeds the warranty reserve.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Consolidated working capital, including
the discontinued operation, was $63.9 million at July 4, 2009, compared with
$98.0 million at January 3, 2009. Included in working capital are cash and cash
equivalents of $27.1 million at July 4, 2009, compared with $40.1 million at
January 3, 2009. At July 4, 2009, $25.9 million of cash and cash equivalents
were held by our foreign subsidiaries.
First
Six Months of 2009
Our operating activities provided cash
of $18.6 million in the first six months of 2009 primarily related to our
continuing operations. The cash provided by our continuing operations in the
first six months of 2009 primarily resulted from a decrease in accounts
receivable of $18.8 million and a decrease in inventories of $13.8 million.
These sources of cash in 2009 were offset in part by uses of cash from a
decrease in accounts payable of $9.6 million and a decrease in other current
liabilities of $9.3 million. The decreases in accounts
receivable and accounts payable were primarily associated with our
stock-preparation equipment product line in North America. In addition, the
shipment of a large order in our stock-preparation equipment product line to
Vietnam contributed to decreases in other current liabilities and
inventory.
Our investing activities used cash of
$3.1 million in the first six months of 2009 related entirely to our
continuing operations. We used cash of $2.0 million in the first six
months of 2009 to purchase property, plant, and equipment and $0.9 million
of cash for additional consideration associated with the Kadant Johnson Inc.
acquisition.
Our financing activities used cash of
$29.8 million in the first six months of 2009 related entirely to our
continuing operations. We repaid $45.0 million and received cash proceeds of
$19.0 million under our outstanding short- and long-term obligations. In
addition, we used cash of $3.7 million in the first six months of 2009 to
repurchase our common stock on the open market.
First
Six Months of 2008
Our operating activities provided cash
of $10.9 million in the first six months of 2008 related primarily to our
continuing operations. The cash provided by our continuing operations in the
first six months of 2008 was primarily due to income from continuing operations
of $12.0 million, a decrease in unbilled contract costs and fees of $8.3
million, and a non-cash charge of $3.8 million for depreciation and amortization
expense. The decrease in unbilled contract costs and fees primarily related to a
decrease in revenues in our stock-preparation equipment product line. These
sources of cash were offset in part by an increase in inventories of $8.7
million and a decrease in other current liabilities of $4.1 million primarily
due to a decrease in billings in excess of contract costs and fees related to
the timing of contracts recognized under the percentage-of-completion
method.
Our investing activities used cash of
$4.3 million in the first six months of 2008 related entirely to our continuing
operations. We used cash of $3.1 million to purchase property, plant, and
equipment, $1.2 million of cash for additional consideration associated with the
asset acquisition of Jining Huayi Light Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. (Kadant
Jining acquisition), and $0.9 million of cash for additional consideration
associated with the Kadant Johnson Inc. acquisition. Offsetting these uses of
cash was $0.9 million received from the sale of property, plant, and
equipment.
Our financing activities used cash of
$16.3 million in the first six months of 2008 related entirely to our continuing
operations. We received cash proceeds of $37.0 million and repaid $35.1 million
under a revolving credit facility. In addition, we used cash of $18.9
million to repurchase our common stock on the open market.
Revolving
Credit Facility
On February 13, 2008, we entered
into a five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (2008 Credit Agreement) in
the aggregate principal amount of up to $75 million, which includes an
uncommitted unsecured incremental borrowing facility of up to an additional $75
million. We can borrow up to $75 million under the 2008 Credit Agreement with a
sublimit of $60 million within the 2008 Credit Agreement available for the
issuance of letters of credit and bank guarantees. The principal on any
borrowings made under the 2008 Credit Agreement is due on February 13,
2013. As of July 4, 2009, the outstanding balance borrowed under the 2008 Credit
Agreement was $15.0 million. The amount we are able to borrow under the 2008
Credit Agreement is the total borrowing capacity less any outstanding
borrowings, letters of credit and multi-currency borrowings issued under the
2008 Credit Agreement. As of July 4, 2009, we had $53.2 million of borrowing
capacity available under the committed portion of the 2008 Credit
Agreement.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources (continued)
Our
obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement may be accelerated upon the
occurrence of an event of default under the 2008 Credit Agreement, which
includes customary events of default including, without limitation, payment
defaults, defaults in the performance of affirmative and negative covenants, the
inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency related
defaults, defaults relating to such matters as the Employment Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA), uninsured judgments and the failure to pay certain
indebtedness, and a change of control default.
The 2008 Credit Agreement contains
negative covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, including financial
covenants requiring us to comply with a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of
3.5 and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.2, and
restrictions on liens, indebtedness, fundamental changes, dispositions of
property, making certain restricted payments (including dividends and stock
repurchases), investments, transactions with affiliates, sale and leaseback
transactions, swap agreements, changing our fiscal year, arrangements affecting
subsidiary distributions, entering into new lines of business, and certain
actions related to the discontinued operation. As of July 4, 2009, we were in
compliance with these covenants. Our earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as defined in the 2008 Credit Agreement,
is a factor used in the consolidated leverage and fixed charge ratios. We expect
to stay in compliance with these financial covenants during the remainder of
2009; however, this is largely dependent on our ability to meet our EBITDA
targets and take other potential actions, such as repaying a portion of our debt
obligations, as needed to stay in compliance with the covenants. A default under
our 2008 Credit Agreement would have significant negative consequences on our
current operations, our swap agreements, and our future ability to fund our
operations and grow our business. We may seek to renegotiate certain terms of
our 2008 Credit Agreement or seek waivers from compliance with these financial
covenants, both of which could result in additional borrowing costs and fees.
Further, there can be no assurance that our lenders would amend such terms or
grant such waivers.
Commercial
Real Estate Loan
On May 4, 2006, we borrowed $10
million under a promissory note (2006 Commercial Real Estate Loan). The 2006
Commercial Real Estate Loan is repayable in quarterly installments of $125
thousand over a ten-year period with the remaining principal balance of $5
million due upon maturity. As of July 4, 2009, the remaining balance on the 2006
Commercial Real Estate Loan was $8.5 million.
Our obligations under the 2006
Commercial Real Estate Loan may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an event
of default under the 2006 Commercial Real Estate Loan and the Mortgage and
Security Agreements, which includes customary events of default including
without limitation payment defaults, defaults in the performance of covenants
and obligations, the inaccuracy of representations or warranties, bankruptcy-
and insolvency-related defaults, liens on the properties or collateral and
uninsured judgments. In addition, the occurrence of an event of default under
the 2008 Credit Agreement or any successor credit facility would be an event of
default under the 2006 Commercial Real Estate Loan.
Kadant
Jining Loan and Credit Facilities
On January 28, 2008, our Kadant
Jining subsidiary borrowed 40 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately
$5.9 million at the July 4, 2009 exchange rate (2008 Kadant Jining Loan).
Principal on the 2008 Kadant Jining Loan is due as follows: 24 million
Chinese renminbi, or approximately $3.5 million, on January 28, 2010 and
16 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately $2.4 million, on
January 28, 2011.
On July 30, 2008, Kadant Jining
and our Kadant Yanzhou subsidiary (Kadant Yanzhou) each entered into a
short-term credit line facility agreement (2008 Facilities) that would allow
Kadant Jining to borrow up to an aggregate principal amount of 45 million
Chinese renminbi, or approximately $6.6 million at the July 4, 2009 exchange
rate, and Kadant Yanzhou to borrow up to an aggregate principal amount of
15 million Chinese renminbi, or approximately $2.2 million at the July 4,
2009 exchange rate. The 2008 Facilities have a term of 364 days and are
renewable annually on or before July 30 at the discretion of the lender. As
of July 4, 2009, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2008
Facilities.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources (continued)
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
To hedge the exposure to movements in
the 3-month LIBOR rate on outstanding debt, on February 13, 2008, we
entered into a swap agreement (2008 Swap Agreement). The 2008 Swap Agreement has
a five-year term and a $15 million notional value, which decreases to $10
million on December 31, 2010, and $5 million on December 30, 2011.
Under the 2008 Swap Agreement, on a quarterly basis we receive a 3-month LIBOR
rate and pay a fixed rate of interest of 3.265%. We also entered into a swap
agreement in 2006 (2006 Swap Agreement) to convert the 2006 Commercial Real
Estate Loan from a floating to a fixed rate of interest. The 2006 Swap Agreement
has the same terms and quarterly payment dates as the corresponding debt, and
reduces proportionately in line with the amortization of the 2006 Commercial
Real Estate Loan. Under the 2006 Swap Agreement, we receive a three-month LIBOR
rate and pay a fixed rate of interest of 5.63%. As of July 4, 2009, we
hedged $23.5 million, or 80%, of our outstanding debt through interest rate swap
agreements, which had an unrealized loss of $1.8 million. Our management
believes that any credit risk associated with the 2006 and 2008 Swap Agreements
is remote based on the creditworthiness of the financial institution issuing the
swap agreements.
Additional
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On October 22, 2008, our board of
directors approved the repurchase by us of up to $30 million of our equity
securities during the period from October 22, 2008 through October 22,
2009. As of July 4, 2009, we had repurchased 494,493 shares of our common stock
for $5.9 million and have $24.1 million remaining under this authorization.
Repurchases under this authorization may be made in public or private
transactions, including under Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b-5-1 trading
plans.
In the second quarter of 2009, we
implemented a one-time cash repatriation plan to use cash from our foreign
subsidiaries to repay a portion of our outstanding debt obligations in the U.S.
and China in the second and third quarters of 2009. As a result, we repatriated
$29.2 million of cash to the U.S. by the end of the second quarter of 2009 and
expect to repatriate approximately $8.7 million of cash by the end of the third
quarter of 2009. It is our intention to reinvest indefinitely the remaining
earnings of our international subsidiaries in order to support the current and
future capital needs of their operations. Through July 4, 2009, we have not
provided for U.S. income taxes on approximately $58.6 million of unremitted
foreign earnings. The U.S. tax cost has not been determined due to the fact that
it is not practicable to estimate at this time. The related foreign tax
withholding, which would be required if we remitted the foreign earnings to the
U.S., would be approximately $1.0 million.
It is our policy to provide for
uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon
management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be
sustained upon examination by tax authorities. At July 4, 2009, we had a
liability for unrecognized tax benefits and an accrual for the payment of
interest and penalties totaling $7.4 million. To the extent we prevail in
matters for which a liability for an unrecognized tax benefit is established or
are required to pay amounts in excess of the liability, our effective tax rate
in a given financial statement period may be affected.
In 2005, Composites LLC sold its
composites business, which is presented as a discontinued operation in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Under the terms of the
asset purchase agreement, Composites LLC retained certain liabilities associated
with the operation of the business prior to the sale, including warranty
obligations related to products manufactured prior to the sale date. Composites
LLC retained all of the cash proceeds received from the asset sale and continued
to administer and pay warranty claims from the sale proceeds into the third
quarter of 2007. On September 30, 2007, Composites LLC announced that it no
longer had sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was unable to pay or
process warranty claims, and ceased doing business. At July 4, 2009, the accrued
warranty costs for Composites LLC were $2.1 million.
Although we currently have no material
commitments for capital expenditures, we plan to make expenditures of
approximately $0.8 million during the remainder of 2009 for property, plant, and
equipment.
In the future, our liquidity position
will be primarily affected by the level of cash flows from operations, cash paid
to satisfy debt repayments, capital projects, stock repurchases, or additional
acquisitions, if any. We believe that our existing resources, together with the
cash available from our credit facilities and the cash we expect to generate
from continuing operations, will be sufficient to meet the capital requirements
of our current operations for the foreseeable future.
Item 3 – Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk from
changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates has not changed
materially from our exposure at year-end 2008 as disclosed in Item 7A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2009 filed with
the SEC.
Item 4 – Controls and
Procedures
(a)
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
Our management, under the supervision
and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of July 4, 2009. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), means controls and other
procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated
to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal
financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Based upon the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July
4, 2009, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
as of July 4, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
There have not been any changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the
fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 – Legal
Proceedings
We have been named as a co-defendant,
together with Composites LLC and another defendant, in a consumer class action
lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts (the District Court) on December 27, 2007 on behalf of a
putative class of individuals who own GeoDeck™ decking or railing products
manufactured by Composites LLC between April 2002 and October 2003. The
complaint in this matter purports to assert, among other things, causes of
action for unfair and deceptive trade practices, fraud, negligence, breach of
warranty and unjust enrichment, and it seeks compensatory damages and punitive
damages under various state consumer protection statutes. The District Court
dismissed the complaint against all defendants in its entirety on November 19,
2008. The plaintiffs have appealed the District Court’s dismissal to the U.S.
First Circuit Court of Appeals (Court of Appeals). The Court of Appeals has yet
to schedule a hearing on the plaintiffs’ appeal. We intend to defend against
this action vigorously, but there is no assurance we will prevail in such
defense or that additional lawsuits asserting similar claims will not be filed
against us. We could incur significant costs to defend this lawsuit or similar
lawsuits and a judgment or a settlement of such claims could have a material
adverse impact on our condensed consolidated financial results. We have not made
an accrual related to this litigation as we believe that an adverse outcome is
not probable and estimable at this time.
Item 1A – Risk
Factors
In connection with the “safe harbor”
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we wish to
caution readers that the following important factors, among others, in some
cases have affected, and in the future could affect, our actual results and
could cause our actual results in 2009 and beyond to differ materially from
those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us, or on our
behalf.
Our
business is dependent on worldwide and local economic conditions as well as the
condition of the pulp and paper industry.
We sell products primarily to the pulp
and paper industry, which is a cyclical industry. Generally, the financial
condition of the global pulp and paper industry corresponds to the condition of
the worldwide economy, as well as to a number of other factors, including pulp
and paper production capacity relative to demand. Since the third quarter of
2008, worldwide equity and credit markets have been experiencing extreme
volatility and disruption and the markets in which we sell our products, both
globally and locally, are experiencing severe economic downturns, the lengths of
which are difficult to predict. This global uncertainty and turmoil and the
recession in many economies have adversely affected demand for our customers’
products, as well as for our products, especially our capital equipment
products. Our stock-preparation equipment product line has been particularly
affected since it contains a higher proportion of capital products than our
other product lines. The slowing of demand as consumer and economic activity
declines results in reduced demand for paper and board products. This reduced
demand has resulted in an overcapacity situation in many grades of paper,
particularly linerboard, in most regions of the world, which adversely affects
our capital business. In addition, paper producers are lowering their production
rates, which adversely impacts the sales of our products, including parts and
consumables. Also, the crisis affecting financial institutions has caused, and
is likely to continue to cause, liquidity and credit issues for many businesses,
including our customers in the pulp and paper industry as well as other
industries, and results in their inability to fund projects, capacity expansion
plans and, to some extent, routine operations. We expect these factors to
particularly affect planned or proposed projects in developing economies in
Eastern Europe and Russia, which have recently been a source of significant
capital expansion projects for both our stock-preparation and fluid-handling
systems and equipment product lines. These conditions have resulted in a number
of structural changes in the pulp and paper industry, including decreased
spending, mill closures, consolidations, and bankruptcies, all of which
adversely affect our business, revenue, and profitability.
Furthermore, the inability of our
customers to obtain credit may affect our ability to recognize revenue and
income, particularly on large capital equipment orders from new customers for
which we may require letters of credit. We may also be unable to issue letters
of credit to our customers, required in some cases to guarantee performance, if
the economic crisis continues and we exhaust our existing sources of credit. In
addition, paper producers have been and continue to be negatively affected by
higher operating costs, especially higher energy and chemical
costs.
Paper
companies have curtailed their capital and operating spending in the current
economic environment and will likely be cautious about resuming spending, if and
when market conditions improve. As paper companies consolidate in response to
market weakness, they frequently reduce capacity and postpone or even cancel
capacity addition or expansion projects. For example, in China, the worsening
economic conditions have resulted in an oversupply of linerboard as demand has
fallen with the reduction in exports to the U.S. and other countries. Major
paper producers in that country have curtailed production to address the
oversupply and announced delays or cancellations of several new paper machines
used to produce linerboard. Several large projects in Asia and Russia have been
cancelled or delayed until later in 2009 or into 2010. These cancellations and
delays have caused us to lower our expectations of revenues and earnings per
share for the 2009 fiscal year and may negatively impact us in future years as
well. Our financial performance for 2009 and potentially longer will be
negatively impacted if there are additional delays in customers securing
financing or our customers become unable to secure such financing. In addition,
it is extremely difficult to accurately forecast our revenues and earnings per
share in the current economic environment.
Certain of our contracts, particularly
for stock-preparation and systems orders, require us to provide a standby letter
of credit to a customer as beneficiary to guarantee our warranty and performance
obligations under the contract. One of our customers has indicated its intention
to draw upon all of the outstanding standby letters of credit, which total $5.8
million. These letters of credit were issued to secure our warranty and
performance obligations under multiple contracts with that customer and we
believe that the reasons for the draws are principally unrelated to our warranty
and performance obligations. We have opposed, and intend to continue to
vigorously oppose, these draws and any other potential claims and may incur
significant legal expenses in the process, and if we are unsuccessful
we could incur a significant expense that would adversely affect our financial
results. In addition, due to this dispute we currently have poor relations with
this customer, and unless they improve, the loss of business from this customer
could negatively affect our future revenues.
Our
debt may adversely affect our cash flow and may restrict our investment
opportunities.
In 2008, we entered into a five-year
unsecured revolving credit facility (2008 Credit Agreement) in the aggregate
principal amount of up to $75 million, which includes an uncommitted unsecured
incremental borrowing facility of up to an additional $75 million. We had $15
million outstanding under the 2008 Credit Agreement as of July 4, 2009 and we
have also borrowed additional amounts under other agreements to fund our
operations. We may also obtain additional long-term debt and working capital
lines of credit to meet future financing needs, which would have the effect of
increasing our total leverage.
Our
indebtedness could have negative consequences, including:
|
–
|
increasing
our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry
conditions,
|
|
–
|
limiting
our ability to obtain additional
financing,
|
|
–
|
limiting
our ability to pay dividends on or to repurchase our capital
stock,
|
|
–
|
limiting
our ability to complete a merger or an
acquisition,
|
|
–
|
limiting
our ability to acquire new products and technologies through acquisitions
or licensing agreements, and
|
|
–
|
limiting
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business
and the industries in which we
compete.
|
Our existing indebtedness bears
interest at floating rates and as a result, our interest payment obligations on
our indebtedness will increase if interest rates increase. To reduce the
exposure to floating rates, we hedged $23.5 million, or 80%, of our outstanding
floating rate debt as of July 4, 2009 through interest rate swap agreements. The
unrealized loss associated with these swap agreements was $1.8 million as of
July 4, 2009. This unrealized loss represents the estimated amount that the swap
agreements could be settled for. The counterparty to the swap agreements could
demand an early termination of the swap agreements if we are in default under
the 2008 Credit Agreement, or any agreement that amends or replaces the 2008
Credit Agreement in which the counterparty is a member, and we are unable to
cure the default. An event of default under the 2008 Credit Agreement includes
customary events of default including failure to comply with a maximum
consolidated leverage ratio of 3.5 and a minimum consolidated fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.2. If these swap agreements were terminated prior to the
scheduled maturity date and if we were required to pay cash for the value of the
swap, we would incur a loss, which would adversely affect our financial
results.
Our ability to satisfy our obligations
and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performance and on
economic, financial, competitive, and other factors beyond our control. Our
business may not generate sufficient cash flows to meet these obligations or to
successfully execute our business strategy. The 2008 Credit Agreement includes
certain financial covenants requiring us to comply with a maximum consolidated
leverage ratio of 3.5 and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of
1.2. Our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA), as defined in the 2008 Credit Agreement, is a factor used in these
ratios. As of July 4, 2009, we were in compliance with these covenants. Our
failure to comply with these covenants may result in an event of default under
the 2008 Credit Agreement, the swap agreements, and the other credit facilities,
and would have significant negative consequences on our current operations and
our future ability to fund our operations and grow our business. If we are
unable to service our debt and fund our business, we may be forced to reduce or
delay capital expenditures or research and development expenditures, seek
additional financing or equity capital, restructure or refinance our debt, or
sell assets. We may seek to renegotiate certain terms of our 2008 Credit
Agreement or seek waivers from compliance with these financial covenants, both
of which could result in additional borrowing costs. Further, there can be no
assurance that our lenders would amend such terms or grant such waivers or that
we would be able to obtain additional financing, or refinance other existing
debt on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Restrictions
in our 2008 Credit Agreement may limit our activities.
Our 2008 Credit Agreement contains, and
future debt instruments to which we may become subject may contain, restrictive
covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that could otherwise
benefit us, including restrictions on our ability and the ability of our
subsidiaries to:
|
–
|
incur
additional indebtedness,
|
|
–
|
pay
dividends on, redeem, or repurchase our capital
stock,
|
|
–
|
enter
into transactions with affiliates,
and
|
|
–
|
consolidate,
merge, or transfer all or substantially all of our assets and the assets
of our subsidiaries.
|
We are also required to meet specified
financial covenants under the terms of our 2008 Credit Agreement. Our ability to
comply with these financial restrictions and covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other
factors, including factors that are beyond our control such as currency exchange
rates, interest rates, changes in technology, and changes in the level of
competition.
Our failure to comply with any of these
restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default under our 2008
Credit Agreement and other loan obligations, which could permit acceleration of
the debt under those instruments and require us to repay the debt before its
scheduled due date.
If an event of default were to occur,
we may not have sufficient funds available to make the payments required under
our indebtedness. If we are unable to repay amounts owed under our debt
agreements, those lenders may be entitled to foreclose on and sell the
collateral that secures our borrowings under the agreements.
We
may be required to reorganize our operations in response to changing conditions
in the worldwide economy and the pulp and paper industry, and such actions may
require significant expenditures and may not be successful.
We have undertaken various
restructuring measures in response to changing market conditions in the
countries in which we operate and in the pulp and paper industry in general,
which have affected our business. We may engage in additional cost reduction
programs in the future. We may not recoup the costs of programs we have already
initiated, or other programs in which we may decide to engage in the future, the
costs of which may be significant. In connection with any future plant closures,
delays or
failures in the transition of production from existing facilities to our other
facilities in other geographic regions could also adversely affect our results
of operations. In addition, it is extremely difficult to accurately
forecast our financial performance in the current economic environment, and
the efforts we make to align our cost structure may not be sufficient or able to
keep pace with rapidly changing business conditions. Our profitability may
decline if our restructuring efforts do not sufficiently reduce our future costs
and position us to maintain or increase our sales.
A
significant portion of our international sales has, and may in the future, come
from China and we operate several manufacturing facilities in China, which
exposes us to political, economic, operational and other risks.
We have historically had significant
revenues from China, operate significant facilities in China, and expect to
manufacture and source more of our equipment and components from China in the
future. Our manufacturing facilities in China, as well as the significant level
of revenues from China, expose us to increased risk in the event of economic
slowdowns, changes in the policies of the Chinese government, political unrest,
unstable economic conditions, or other developments in China or in U.S.-China
relations that are adverse to trade, including enactment of protectionist
legislation or trade or currency restrictions. In addition, orders from
customers in China, particularly for large stock-preparation systems that have
been tailored to a customer’s specific requirements, have credit risks higher
than we generally incur elsewhere, and some orders are subject to the receipt of
financing approvals from the Chinese government. For this reason, we do not
record signed contracts from customers in China for large stock-preparation
systems as orders until we receive the down payments for such contracts. The
timing of the receipt of these orders and the down payments are uncertain and
there is no assurance that we will be able to recognize revenue on these
contracts. We may experience a loss if the contract is cancelled prior to the
receipt of a down payment in the event we commence engineering or other work
associated with the contract. In addition, we may experience a loss if the
contract is cancelled, or the customers do not fulfill their obligations under
the contract, prior to the receipt of a letter of credit covering the remaining
balance of the contract. Typically, the letter of credit represents 80% or more
of the total order.
Worsening economic conditions have led
some customers in China to defer, slow down, or cancel planned capital projects,
especially those dependent on exports to Western economies, such as linerboard
production. These actions will cause us to recognize revenue on certain
contracts in periods later than originally anticipated, or not at
all.
Our
business is subject to economic, currency, political, and other risks associated
with international sales and operations.
During both the first six months of
2009 and 2008, approximately 60% of our sales were to customers outside the
United States, principally in Europe and China. In addition, we operate several
manufacturing operations worldwide, including those in Asia, Europe, Mexico, and
Brazil. International revenues and operations are subject to a number of risks,
including the following:
|
–
|
agreements
may be difficult to enforce and receivables difficult to collect through a
foreign country’s legal system,
|
|
–
|
foreign
customers may have longer payment
cycles,
|
|
–
|
foreign
countries may impose additional withholding taxes or otherwise tax our
foreign income, impose tariffs, adopt other restrictions on foreign trade,
impose currency restrictions or enact other protectionist or anti-trade
measures,
|
|
–
|
worsening
economic conditions may result in worker unrest, labor actions, and
potential work stoppages,
|
|
–
|
it
may be difficult to repatriate funds, due to unfavorable tax consequences
or other restrictions or limitations imposed by foreign governments,
and
|
|
–
|
the
protection of intellectual property in foreign countries may be more
difficult to enforce.
|
Although
we seek to charge our customers in the same currency in which our operating
costs are incurred, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may affect product
demand and adversely affect the profitability in U.S. dollars of products we
provide in international markets where payment for our products and services is
made in their local currencies. In addition, our inability to repatriate funds
could adversely affect our ability to service our debt obligations. Any of these
factors could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of
operations. Furthermore, while some risks can be hedged using derivatives or
other financial instruments, or may be insurable, such attempts to mitigate
these risks may be costly and not always successful.
We
are subject to intense competition in all our markets.
We believe that the principal
competitive factors affecting the markets for our products include quality,
price, service, technical expertise, and product performance and innovation. Our
competitors include a number of large multinational corporations that may have
substantially greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do. As a
result, they may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies
and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the
promotion and sale of their services and products. Competitors’ technologies may
prove to be superior to ours. Our current products, those under development, and
our ability to develop new technologies may not be sufficient to enable us to
compete effectively. Competition, especially in China, has increased as new
companies enter the market and existing competitors expand their product lines
and manufacturing operations.
Adverse
changes to the soundness of our suppliers and customers could affect our
business and results of operations.
All of our businesses are exposed to
risk associated with the creditworthiness of our key suppliers and customers,
including pulp and paper manufacturers and other industrial customers, many of
which may be adversely affected by the volatile conditions in the financial
markets, worldwide economic downturns, and worsening economic
conditions. These conditions could result in financial instability,
bankruptcy, or other adverse effects at any of our suppliers or customers. The
consequences of such adverse effects could include the interruption of
production at the facilities of our suppliers, the reduction, delay or
cancellation of customer orders, delays in or the inability of customers to
obtain financing to purchase our products, and bankruptcy of customers or other
creditors. For example, two of our customers in North America, Smurfit-Stone
Container Corporation and Abitibi Bowater Inc., filed for bankruptcy protection
in the first quarter of 2009, which will adversely affect our revenues and
ability to collect on certain receivables, among other things. Any adverse
changes to the soundness of our suppliers or customers may adversely affect our
cash flow, profitability and financial condition.
Adverse
changes to the soundness of financial institutions could affect us.
We have relationships with many
financial institutions, including lenders under our credit facilities and
insurance underwriters, and from time to time, we execute transactions with
counterparties in the financial industry, such as our interest swap arrangements
and other hedging transactions. As a consequence of the recent and continuing
volatility in the financial markets, these financial institutions or
counterparties could be adversely affected and we may not be able to access
credit facilities, complete transactions as intended, or otherwise obtain the
benefit of the arrangements we have entered into with such financial parties,
which could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
The
inability of Kadant Composites LLC to pay claims against it has exposed us to
litigation, which if we are unable to successfully defend, could have a material
adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial results.
On October 21, 2005, our Kadant
Composites LLC subsidiary (Composites LLC) sold substantially all of its assets
to LDI Composites Co. (Buyer). Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement,
Composites LLC retained certain liabilities associated with the operation of the
business prior to the sale, including warranty obligations related to products
manufactured prior to the sale date (Retained Liabilities), and, jointly and
severally with its parent company Kadant Inc., agreed to indemnify the Buyer
against losses caused to the Buyer arising from claims associated with the
Retained Liabilities. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, the
indemnification obligation was contractually limited to approximately $8.9
million. On May 1, 2009, the Buyer sold the business to a third party and
pursuant to the second amendment to the asset purchase agreement, among other
matters, the new buyer was included as an indemnified party and the
indemnification obligation was lowered to $8.4 million. All activity related to
this business is classified in the results of the discontinued operation in our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Composites LLC retained all of the cash
proceeds received from the asset sale and continued to administer and pay
warranty claims from the sale proceeds into the third quarter of 2007. On
September 30, 2007, Composites LLC announced that it no longer had
sufficient funds to honor warranty claims, was unable to pay or process warranty
claims, and ceased doing business. We are now co-defendants in a purported
consumer class action, together with Composites LLC and another defendant,
arising from these warranty claims, in which the plaintiffs claim that such
damages exceed $50 million. See Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” for
further information. We could incur substantial costs to defend ourselves and
the Buyer under our indemnification obligations in this lawsuit and a judgment
or a settlement of the claims against the defendants could have a material
adverse impact on our condensed consolidated financial results. Creditors or
other claimants against Composites LLC may seek other parties, including us,
against whom to assert claims. While we believe any such asserted or possible
claims against us or the Buyer would be without merit, the cost of litigation
and the outcome, if we were unable to successfully defend such claims, could
adversely affect our condensed consolidated financial results.
An
increase in the accrual for warranty costs of the discontinued operation
adversely affects our condensed consolidated financial results.
The discontinued operation has
experienced significant liabilities associated with warranty claims related to
its composite decking products manufactured prior to the sale date. The accrued
warranty costs of the discontinued operation as of July 4, 2009 represents the
low end of the estimated range of warranty costs required to be recorded under
SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” based on the level of claims
received. Composites LLC has calculated that the total potential warranty cost
ranges from $2.1 million to approximately $13.1 million. The high end of the
range represents the estimated maximum level of warranty claims remaining based
on the total sales of the products under warranty. On September 30, 2007,
the discontinued operation ceased doing business and has no employees or other
service providers to collect or process warranty claims. Composites LLC will
continue to record adjustments to accrued warranty costs to reflect the minimum
amount of the potential range of loss for products under warranty based on
judgments entered against it in litigation, which will adversely affect our
consolidated results.
Our
inability to successfully identify and complete acquisitions or successfully
integrate any new or previous acquisitions could have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Our strategy includes the acquisition
of technologies and businesses that complement or augment our existing products
and services. Our most recent acquisition was the Kadant Jining acquisition in
June 2006. Any such acquisition involves numerous risks that may adversely
affect our future financial performance and cash flows. These risks
include:
|
–
|
competition
with other prospective buyers resulting in our inability to complete an
acquisition or in us paying substantial premiums over the fair value of
the net assets of the acquired
business,
|
|
–
|
inability
to obtain regulatory approval, including antitrust
approvals,
|
|
–
|
difficulty
in assimilating operations, technologies, products and the key employees
of the acquired business,
|
|
–
|
inability
to maintain existing customers or to sell the products and services of the
acquired business to our existing
customers,
|
|
–
|
diversion
of management’s attention away from other business
concerns,
|
|
–
|
inability
to improve the revenues and profitability or realize the cost savings and
synergies expected in the
acquisition,
|
|
–
|
assumption
of significant liabilities, some of which may be unknown at the
time,
|
|
–
|
potential
future impairment of the value of goodwill and intangible assets acquired,
and
|
|
–
|
identification
of internal control deficiencies of the acquired
business.
|
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a $40.3 million impairment charge to write
down the goodwill associated with the stock-preparation reporting unit within
our Papermaking Systems segment. We may incur additional impairment charges to
write down the value of our goodwill and acquired intangible assets in the
future if the assets are not deemed recoverable, which could have a material
adverse affect on our operating results.
Our
fiber-based products business is subject to a number of factors that may
adversely influence its profitability, including dependence on a few
suppliers of raw materials and fluctuations in the costs of natural
gas.
We are dependent on
three paper mills for the fiber used in the manufacture of our fiber-based
granular products. Due to process changes at the mills, we have experienced some
difficulty obtaining sufficient raw material to operate at optimal production
levels. We continue to work with the mills to ensure a stable supply of raw
material. To date, we have been able to meet all of our customer delivery
requirements, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to meet future
delivery requirements. Although we believe our relationships with the mills are
good, the mills could decide not to continue to supply sufficient papermaking
byproducts, or may not agree to continue to supply such products on commercially
reasonable terms. If the mills were unable or unwilling to supply us sufficient
fiber, we would be forced to find an alternative supply for this raw material.
We may be unable to find an alternative supply on commercially reasonable terms
or could incur excessive transportation costs if an alternative supplier were
found, which would increase our manufacturing costs, and might prevent prices
for our products from being competitive or require closure of the
business.
We use natural gas, the price of which
is subject to fluctuation, in the production of our fiber-based granular
products. We seek to manage our exposure to natural gas price fluctuations by
entering into short-term forward contracts to purchase specified quantities of
natural gas from a supplier. We may not be able to effectively manage our
exposure to natural gas price fluctuations. Higher costs of natural gas would
adversely affect our consolidated results if we were unable to effectively
manage our exposure or pass these costs on to customers in the form of
surcharges.
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse
effect on our business. In addition, third parties may claim that we infringe
their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expense as a result.
We seek patent and trade secret
protection for significant new technologies, products, and processes because of
the length of time and expense associated with bringing new products through the
development process and into the marketplace. We own numerous U.S. and foreign
patents, and we intend to file additional applications, as appropriate, for
patents covering our products. Patents may not be issued for any pending or
future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and the claims allowed
under any issued patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our
technology. Any issued patents owned by or licensed to us may be challenged,
invalidated, or circumvented, and the rights under these patents may not provide
us with competitive advantages. In addition, competitors may design around our
technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may
also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could make it
easier for competitors to capture increased market share. We could incur
substantial costs to defend ourselves in suits brought against us, including for
alleged infringement of third party rights, or in suits in which we may assert
our intellectual property rights against others. An unfavorable outcome of any
such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations. In addition, as our patents expire, we rely on trade secrets and
proprietary know-how to protect our products. We cannot be sure the steps we
have taken or will take in the future will be adequate to deter misappropriation
of our proprietary information and intellectual property. Of particular concern
are developing countries, such as China, where the laws, courts, and
administrative agencies may not protect our intellectual property rights as
fully as in the United States or Europe.
We seek to protect trade secrets and
proprietary know-how, in part, through confidentiality agreements with our
collaborators, employees, and consultants. These agreements may be breached, we
may not have adequate remedies for any breach, and our trade secrets may
otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors or our
competitors may otherwise gain access to our intellectual property.
Our
share price will fluctuate.
Stock markets in general and our common
stock in particular have experienced significant price and volume volatility
over the past year. The market price and trading volume of our common stock may
continue to be subject to significant fluctuations due not only to general stock
market conditions but also to a change in sentiment in the market regarding our
operations, business prospects, or future funding. Given the nature of the
markets in which we participate and the impact of accounting standards related
to revenue recognition, we may not be able to reliably predict future revenues
and profitability, and unexpected changes may cause us to adjust our operations.
A large proportion of our costs are fixed, due in part to our significant
selling, research and development, and manufacturing costs. Thus, small declines
in revenues could disproportionately affect our operating results. Other factors
that could affect our share price and quarterly operating results
include:
|
–
|
failure
of our products to pass contractually agreed upon acceptance tests, which
would delay or prohibit recognition of revenues under applicable
accounting guidelines,
|
|
–
|
changes
in the assumptions used for revenue recognized under the
percentage-of-completion method of
accounting,
|
|
–
|
failure
of a customer, particularly in Asia, to comply with an order’s contractual
obligations or inability of a customer to provide financial assurances of
performance,
|
|
–
|
adverse
changes in demand for and market acceptance of our
products,
|
|
–
|
competitive
pressures resulting in lower sales prices for our
products,
|
|
–
|
adverse
changes in the pulp and paper
industry,
|
|
–
|
delays
or problems in our introduction of new
products,
|
|
–
|
delays
or problems in the manufacture of our
products,
|
|
–
|
our
competitors’ announcements of new products, services, or technological
innovations,
|
|
–
|
contractual
liabilities incurred by us related to guarantees of our product
performance,
|
|
–
|
increased
costs of raw materials or supplies, including the cost of
energy,
|
|
–
|
changes
in the timing of product orders,
|
|
–
|
fluctuations
in our effective tax rate,
|
|
–
|
the
operating and share price performance of companies that investors consider
to be comparable to us, and
|
|
–
|
changes
in global financial markets and global economies and general market
conditions.
|
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents, under Delaware law, and in our shareholder
rights plan could prevent or delay transactions that our shareholders may
favor.
Provisions of our charter and bylaws
may discourage, delay, or prevent a merger or acquisition that our shareholders
may consider favorable, including transactions in which shareholders might
otherwise receive a premium for their shares. For example, these
provisions:
|
–
|
authorize
the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock without any need for action
by shareholders,
|
|
–
|
provide
for a classified board of directors with staggered three-year
terms,
|
|
–
|
require
supermajority shareholder voting to effect various amendments to our
charter and bylaws,
|
|
–
|
eliminate
the ability of our shareholders to call special meetings of
shareholders,
|
|
–
|
prohibit
shareholder action by written consent,
and
|
|
–
|
establish
advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of
directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at
shareholder meetings.
|
In addition, our board of directors has
adopted a shareholder rights plan intended to protect shareholders in the event
of an unfair or coercive offer to acquire our company and to provide our board
of directors with adequate time to evaluate unsolicited offers. Preferred stock
purchase rights have been distributed to our common shareholders pursuant to the
rights plan. This rights plan may have anti-takeover effects. The rights plan
will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us
on terms that our board of directors does not believe are in our best interests
and those of our shareholders and may discourage, delay, or prevent a merger or
acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable, including transactions in
which shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their
shares.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides
information about purchases by us of our common stock during the second quarter
of 2009:
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased (1)
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
(1)
|
|
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased
Under
the Plans
|
|
4/5/09
– 4/30/09
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
24,112,548 |
|
5/1/09
– 5/31/09
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
24,112,548 |
|
6/1/09
– 7/4/09
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
24,112,548 |
|
Total:
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On
October 22, 2008, our board of directors approved the repurchase by
us of up to $30 million of our equity securities during the period from
October 22, 2008 through October 22, 2009. Repurchases may be
made in public or private transactions, including under Securities
Exchange Act Rule 10b-5-1 trading plans. As of July 4, 2009, we had
repurchased 494,493 shares of our common stock for $5.9 million under this
authorization.
|
Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a
Vote of Security Holders
On May 27, 2009, at the annual meeting
of stockholders, the stockholders re-elected two incumbent directors and
ratified the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm for
the 2009 fiscal year. Dr. John K. Allen and Mr. Francis L. McKone were
elected to the class of directors whose three-year term expires at our annual
meeting of stockholders in 2012. Dr. Allen received 11,132,568 shares voted in
favor of his election and 570,647 shares withheld. Mr. McKone received
11,368,652 shares voted in favor of his election and 334,563 shares
withheld.
At the annual meeting, stockholders
also ratified the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal year. The proposal
received 11,659,035 shares voted in favor of approval, 31,113 shares voted
against, 13,063 shares abstained, and no broker non-votes.
Item 6 –
Exhibits
See Exhibit Index on the page
immediately preceding exhibits.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized as of the
12th day of August, 2009.
|
KADANT
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
M. O’Brien
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|