e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number 0-27038
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-3156479
|
(State or Other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1 Wayside Road
|
|
01803
|
Burlington, Massachusetts
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(781) 565-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the Registrants Common Stock,
outstanding as of April 30, 2010, was 291,222,317.
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
$
|
113,161
|
|
|
$
|
87,025
|
|
|
$
|
226,388
|
|
|
$
|
172,600
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
116,228
|
|
|
|
103,004
|
|
|
|
219,923
|
|
|
|
193,196
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
43,616
|
|
|
|
39,116
|
|
|
|
89,671
|
|
|
|
80,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
273,005
|
|
|
|
229,145
|
|
|
|
535,982
|
|
|
|
445,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
9,051
|
|
|
|
23,293
|
|
|
|
17,808
|
|
Professional services and hosting
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
62,781
|
|
|
|
134,996
|
|
|
|
121,263
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
7,714
|
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
15,704
|
|
|
|
14,180
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
12,184
|
|
|
|
9,409
|
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
17,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
103,600
|
|
|
|
88,378
|
|
|
|
197,195
|
|
|
|
170,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
169,405
|
|
|
|
140,767
|
|
|
|
338,787
|
|
|
|
275,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
37,931
|
|
|
|
27,330
|
|
|
|
74,881
|
|
|
|
57,880
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
50,143
|
|
|
|
129,461
|
|
|
|
110,617
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
31,305
|
|
|
|
25,237
|
|
|
|
58,756
|
|
|
|
50,826
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
22,201
|
|
|
|
19,034
|
|
|
|
44,327
|
|
|
|
36,382
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
20,767
|
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
12,372
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
12,987
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
175,670
|
|
|
|
125,321
|
|
|
|
341,179
|
|
|
|
267,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(6,265
|
)
|
|
|
15,446
|
|
|
|
(2,392
|
)
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,172
|
)
|
|
|
(11,764
|
)
|
|
|
(20,409
|
)
|
|
|
(26,690
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
5,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(13,108
|
)
|
|
|
4,282
|
|
|
|
(17,046
|
)
|
|
|
(10,425
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
10,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
(19,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,038
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
250,656
|
|
|
|
281,998
|
|
|
|
243,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
269,187
|
|
|
|
281,998
|
|
|
|
243,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of September 30,
2009 and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009
have been adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Notes 2 and 12).
2
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
461,804
|
|
|
$
|
527,038
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances for doubtful accounts of
$6,996 and $6,833
|
|
|
215,665
|
|
|
|
199,548
|
|
Acquired unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
|
9,171
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
56,896
|
|
|
|
51,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
749,937
|
|
|
|
795,827
|
|
Land, building and equipment, net
|
|
|
53,286
|
|
|
|
53,468
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,039,705
|
|
|
|
1,891,003
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
706,161
|
|
|
|
706,805
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
77,503
|
|
|
|
52,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,626,592
|
|
|
$
|
3,499,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
$
|
8,318
|
|
|
$
|
6,862
|
|
Contingent and deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
12,663
|
|
|
|
91,431
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
71,262
|
|
|
|
59,574
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
148,976
|
|
|
|
104,819
|
|
Accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
Deferred maintenance revenue
|
|
|
88,268
|
|
|
|
84,607
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
55,334
|
|
|
|
59,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
394,760
|
|
|
|
419,225
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
850,218
|
|
|
|
848,898
|
|
Long-term portion of accrued business combination costs
|
|
|
19,349
|
|
|
|
24,904
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
63,546
|
|
|
|
33,904
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
|
|
56,346
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
80,654
|
|
|
|
73,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,464,154
|
|
|
|
1,456,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2, 5 and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
15,000 shares authorized; 3,562 shares issued and
outstanding (liquidation preference $4,631)
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 560,000 shares
authorized; 291,734 and 280,647 shares issued and 287,985
and 276,935 shares outstanding
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,459,113
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (3,749 and 3,712 shares)
|
|
|
(16,752
|
)
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,917
|
)
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(281,929
|
)
|
|
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,162,438
|
|
|
|
2,043,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,626,592
|
|
|
$
|
3,499,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of September 30,
2009 and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009
have been adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Notes 2 and 12).
3
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,038
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
|
|
10,448
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
67,529
|
|
|
|
53,809
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
44,774
|
|
|
|
35,002
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
6,524
|
|
|
|
6,315
|
|
Non-cash restructuring expense
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
Gain on foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,049
|
)
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(8,541
|
)
|
|
|
33,782
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(4,428
|
)
|
|
|
(8,299
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,249
|
)
|
|
|
25,499
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(10,357
|
)
|
|
|
(2,832
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
29,457
|
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
120,580
|
|
|
|
130,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(7,850
|
)
|
|
|
(12,657
|
)
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(159,352
|
)
|
|
|
(61,712
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Payments for equity investment
|
|
|
(14,970
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Payments for acquired technology
|
|
|
(7,350
|
)
|
|
|
(62,886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(189,522
|
)
|
|
|
(137,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(4,064
|
)
|
|
|
(3,521
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Payments of other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(4,818
|
)
|
|
|
(4,775
|
)
|
Proceeds from settlement of share-based derivatives
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,111
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock
options and purchase plan
|
|
|
18,823
|
|
|
|
7,069
|
|
Cash used to net share settle employee equity awards
|
|
|
(9,246
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
168,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(2,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(65,234
|
)
|
|
|
159,442
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
527,038
|
|
|
|
261,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
461,804
|
|
|
$
|
420,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes. Financial statements as of September 30,
2009 and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009
have been adjusted for the retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20
(see Notes 2 and 12).
4
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Nuance Communications, Inc. (Nuance, we,
or the Company) and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We prepared these unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) for interim periods. In our
opinion, these financial statements reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position for the periods
disclosed. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
We acquired SpinVox Limited (SpinVox), a UK-based
privately-held company engaged in the business of providing
voice to text services, on December 30, 2009 and other
businesses during the second quarter of 2010. Refer to
Note 4 for additional information.
Although we believe the disclosures in these financial
statements are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, certain information normally included in the
footnotes prepared in accordance with GAAP has been omitted.
Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes
thereto included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for a full year.
We reclassified certain acquisition-related costs included
within operating expenses for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2009 to conform to our revised statement of
operations presentation for such costs as disclosed in
Note 2 below. Such reclassifications did not affect total
revenues, gross profit, income (loss) from operations, net
income (loss), or cash flow from operations.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
We have made no material changes to the significant accounting
policies disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, other than as
outlined below.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Previous to our adoption of
ASC 805 in fiscal 2010, certain acquisition-related costs
and adjustments now recorded as operating expenses in our
consolidated statements of operations were included as a part of
the consideration transferred and capitalized as a part of the
accounting for our business acquisitions pursuant to previous
accounting rules, primarily direct transaction costs. In
addition, there were no items under the legacy business
combination accounting guidance that were required to be
re-measured to fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
5,199
|
|
|
$
|
579
|
|
|
$
|
8,652
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
|
|
11,854
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,962
|
|
|
$
|
3,327
|
|
|
$
|
20,767
|
|
|
$
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting
for Collaboration Agreements
On October 9, 2009, we entered into a five-year
collaboration agreement with a third party to accelerate the
development of new speech technologies. All intellectual
property derived from the collaboration will be jointly-owned by
the two parties and Nuance will have the sole rights to
commercialize the intellectual property during the term of the
agreement. All sales related thereto will be recorded as revenue
by the selling party. In consideration for the services from the
third party in the collaboration efforts, as well as the joint
ownership rights over intellectual property developed under the
arrangement and the exclusive right to commercialize such
developed intellectual property for the term of the arrangement,
we will pay $80.0 million in five equal payments of
$16.0 million on August 15th of each year,
payable in cash or our common stock, at our option. These
upfront payments will be recorded as a prepaid asset and
expensed ratably over each annual period, commensurate with the
pattern in which we expect the third party to perform its
services and convey our rights under the arrangement. On
October 14, 2009, we made our first payment under the
arrangement consisting of 1,047,120 shares of our common
stock valued at $16.0 million. For the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010, $4.0 million and
$8.0 million, respectively has been recorded as research
and development expense in our consolidated statements of
operations.
On January 13, 2010, we amended the collaboration agreement
to extend certain provisions for eighteen months following the
termination of the agreement. In consideration for the
extension, we agreed to pay an additional $12.0 million to
the third-party in five equal payments of $2.4 million on
August 15th of each year over the five-year agreement
term, payable in cash or our common stock, at our option, with
the exception of the first payment, which was made during the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 through the issuance of
145,897 shares of our common stock. These upfront payments
are recorded as a prepaid asset when made and will be expensed
ratably to sales and marketing expense over the eighteen-month
extension period.
Accounting
for Convertible Debt
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we adopted the
provisions in FASB
ASC 470-20
as they relate to our convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash upon conversion (formerly referred to as FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)) effective October 1, 2009. The guidance
requires us to separately account for the liability (debt) and
equity (conversion option) components of our convertible debt
instruments that require or permit settlement in cash upon
conversion in a manner that reflects our nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity components of
our convertible debt instruments are recorded to
stockholders equity with an offsetting debt discount. The
debt discount created is amortized to interest expense in our
consolidated statement of operations using the effective
interest method over the expected term of the convertible debt.
The provisions herein discussed have been applied
retrospectively to all financial information presented. Refer to
information below and in Note 12 for further information.
The following tables illustrate the retrospective effect of
adopting
ASC 470-20
to the consolidated statements of operations for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
As Originally
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
As Originally
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
Application
|
|
Reported
|
|
Application
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
9,977
|
|
|
$
|
11,764
|
|
|
$
|
23,135
|
|
|
$
|
26,690
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
6,069
|
|
|
|
4,282
|
|
|
|
(6,870
|
)
|
|
|
(10,425
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
7,067
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
(17,483
|
)
|
|
|
(21,038
|
)
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
6
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the retrospective effect of
adopting
ASC 470-20
to the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted for
|
|
|
As Originally
|
|
Retrospective
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
Application
|
|
Other assets(a)
|
|
$
|
52,511
|
|
|
$
|
52,361
|
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases(b)
|
|
|
888,611
|
|
|
|
848,898
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital(c)
|
|
|
2,254,511
|
|
|
|
2,308,992
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(247,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(262,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other assets have been adjusted for the portion of the debt
issuance costs attributable to the 2.75% Convertible Senior
Notes that must be retrospectively allocated to the equity
component of the debt instrument through additional
paid-in-capital
as of the date of the notes issuance. |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term portion of debt and capital leases has been adjusted
to reflect retrospective recognition of the debt discount
created by bifurcating the equity component of the convertible
notes from the liability component. |
|
(c) |
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
has been adjusted to reflect recording, retrospectively, the
equity component of the convertible notes, as well as the equity
component allocation of the debt issuance costs attributable to
the 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes. |
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic
820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASU
2010-06)
to add additional disclosures about the different classes of
assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation
techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements, and transfers between Levels 1, 2, and
3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value measurements are defined
in Note 8 below. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for us for the interim reporting period beginning
January 1, 2010, except for the provisions related to
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
provisions are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those
fiscal years. ASU
2010-06
impacts disclosure only and therefore, did not, and is not
expected to, have a material impact on our financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2010-17,
Revenue Recognition Milestone Method (Topic 605):
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The ASU codifies
the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 08-9,
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. The amendments
to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification or ASC) provide guidance on
defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate
to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for
research or development transactions. Consideration that is
contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be
recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is
achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain
criteria to be considered substantive. The amendments in the ASU
are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in
fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning
on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If
an entity elects early adoption and the period of adoption is
not the beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity
must apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of
the year of adoption. Entities may also elect to adopt the
amendments in the ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-1,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which
has since been codified in the ASC as ASU
No. 2009-13
(ASU
2009-13),
supersedes EITF Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, now
referred to as
ASC 605-25-50-1.
ASU 2009-13
eliminates the residual method of accounting for non-software
arrangements, as well as the associated requirements for
establishing objective and reliable evidence of fair value. The
residual method is replaced in ASU
2009-13 by
the
7
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
estimated selling price method whereby revenue in a
multiple-element arrangement is allocated to each element based
on its estimated selling price. Estimating selling price is
established through a hierarchy starting with vendor-specific
objective evidence of fair value, followed by third-party
evidence, and lastly by any reasonable, objective estimate of
the selling price were the element to be sold on a standalone
basis. Estimates of selling price must consider both
entity-specific factors and market conditions. ASU
2009-13 is
applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered into,
or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early adoption
is permitted if adopted as of the beginning of an entitys
fiscal year and no prior interim period financial statements
from that fiscal year have already been issued or the entity
retrospectively applies the provisions of this ASU to its
previously-issued current fiscal year interim financial
statements. We currently do not expect that the adoption of ASU
2009-13 will
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the EITF ratified EITF Issue
No. 09-3,
Applicability of AICPA Statement of Position
97-2 to
Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements, which
has since been codified in the Codification as ASU
No. 2009-14
(ASU
2009-14).
ASU 2009-14
applies to multiple-element arrangements that contain both
software and hardware elements, and amends the scope of AICPA
Statement of Position (SOP)
No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition, now referred to as
ASC 985-605,
to exclude tangible products containing software and
non-software components that together function to deliver the
products essential functionality from the scope of
ASC 985-605.
ASU 2009-14
is applied prospectively to all revenue transactions entered
into, or materially modified, after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted only when ASU
2009-13 is
also early adopted as of the same period. We are continuing to
evaluate the potential impact of this ASU on our consolidated
financial statements.
The components of comprehensive loss are as follows (table in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
$
|
(19,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,038
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(11,158
|
)
|
|
|
(14,229
|
)
|
|
|
(12,022
|
)
|
|
|
(26,018
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge derivatives
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
(4,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(10,431
|
)
|
|
|
(14,239
|
)
|
|
|
(10,484
|
)
|
|
|
(30,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(25,827
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,158
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Quarter Acquisitions
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we acquired all of the
outstanding capital stock of two speech-related technology
companies primarily to expand our product offerings and enhance
our technology base. The acquisitions were non-taxable events
and the goodwill resulting from these acquisitions is not
expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The results of
operations of these companies have been included in our
consolidated results from their respective acquisition dates.
The total consideration for these acquisitions was
$26.8 million, including the issuance of 1.1 million
shares of our common stock valued at $18.0 million. In
allocating the total purchase consideration for these
acquisitions based on estimated fair values, we preliminarily
recorded $18.0 million of goodwill, $9.6 million of
identifiable intangible assets, and $0.7 million in net
liabilities (resulting primarily from acquired accounts
receivable, net of liabilities assumed). The preliminary
allocations of the purchase consideration were based upon
preliminary valuations and our estimates and assumptions are
subject to change. Intangible assets acquired included
8
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
primarily core and completed technology and customer
relationships with weighted average useful lives of
7.9 years.
Acquisition
of SpinVox
On December 30, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of SpinVox Limited (SpinVox), a
UK-based privately-held company engaged in the business of
providing
voicemail-to-text
services. The acquisition was a non-taxable event and the
goodwill resulting from this acquisition is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. The results of operations of
SpinVox have been included in our results of operations from
January 1, 2010. The results of operations of SpinVox for
the one day, December 31, 2009, of the fiscal first quarter
during which SpinVox was a part of Nuance were excluded from our
consolidated results for the six months ended March 31,
2010 as such amounts for that one day were immaterial.
A summary of the preliminary allocation of the purchase
consideration is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
67,500
|
|
Common stock(a)
|
|
|
36,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase consideration
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
Accounts receivable(b)
|
|
|
12,891
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
45,300
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
108,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
175,665
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(70,761
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(71,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
103,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock valued
at $15.81 per share based on the closing price of our common
stock on the acquisition date were issued at closing. |
|
(b) |
|
Accounts receivable have been recorded at their estimated fair
value, which consists of the gross accounts receivable assumed
of $16.6 million, reduced by fair value reserve of
$3.7 million, which represents the portion of
SpinVoxs contractually owed accounts receivable we do not
expect to be able to collect. |
The following are the identifiable intangible assets acquired
and their respective weighted average useful lives, as
determined based on a preliminary valuation (table in thousands,
except for years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Core and completed technology
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pro
Forma Results
The following unaudited pro forma financial information
summarizes the combined results of operations for the Company
and SpinVox as though they were combined from October 1,
2008 (table in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
273,005
|
|
|
$
|
233,010
|
|
|
$
|
547,958
|
|
|
$
|
450,956
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
|
(17,548
|
)
|
|
|
(51,236
|
)
|
|
|
(72,620
|
)
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
We have not furnished pro forma financial information relating
to our second quarter acquisitions because such information is
not material, individually or in the aggregate, to our financial
results.
|
|
5.
|
Contingent
Acquisition Payments
|
Earn-out
Payments
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin) we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. Additionally, we would be required to
issue earn-out consideration to SNAPin option holders. Option
earn-out consideration, if earned, is payable at our sole
discretion, in cash, stock or additional options to purchase
common stock. The total value of this option earn-out
consideration may aggregate up to $2.5 million, and will be
recorded as compensation expense over the service period, if
earned. In April 2010, the Company and the former shareholders
of SNAPin agreed on a $21.2 million final value of the
earn-out and recorded the difference of $8.3 million
between the previously recorded earn-out liability as of
September 30, 2009 and the final agreed amount as
additional purchase price during the first half of fiscal 2010.
On April 30, 2010, we issued 565,069 shares of our
common stock, valued at $10.6 million, as our first payment
under the earn-out agreement. The remaining $10.6 million
is payable in cash or stock, solely at our option, on or before
October 1, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, we had recorded
$21.2 million in liabilities, split evenly between current
and long-term.
In connection with our acquisition of Multi-Vision
Communications, Inc. (Multi-Vision), we agreed to
make contingent earn-out payments of up to $15.0 million,
payable in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, relating to
earn-out provisions described in the share purchase agreement.
Two-thirds of the earn-out is conditioned on performance targets
and continued employment; accordingly, up to $10.0 million
of any earn-out payments that become payable will be recorded as
compensation expense, and up to $5.0 million, the portion
of the prospective earn-out attributable solely to performance
targets, will be recorded as additional purchase price and
allocated to goodwill. We have notified the former shareholders
of Multi-Vision that the performance targets were not achieved.
Therefore, through March 31, 2010, we have not recorded any
obligation or related compensation expense relative to these
measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $21.0 million upon the achievement of
certain financial targets measured over defined periods through
December 31, 2010. Payments, if any, may be made in the
form of cash or shares of our common stock, at our sole
discretion. We have notified the former shareholders of Vocada
that the financial targets for certain periods were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Vocada have requested
additional information regarding this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of Vocada
regarding this matter. Through March 31, 2010, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these matters.
10
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $8.0 million upon the achievement of
certain financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and
2010. Payments, if any, may be made in the form of cash or
shares of our common stock, solely at our discretion. We have
notified the former shareholders of Commissure that the
financial targets for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008 were not achieved and the related contingent earn-out
payment was not earned. We are continuing to evaluate the
financial targets related to the fiscal year 2009. Through
March 31, 2010, we have not recorded any earn-out
obligation relative to the Commissure acquisition.
In November 2008, we amended the earn-out provisions set forth
in the merger agreement related to the acquisition of Mobile
Voice Control, Inc. (MVC) such that the former
shareholders of MVC were eligible to earn 377,964 and
755,929 shares based on the achievement of calendar 2008
and 2009 financial targets, respectively. The stock payments, if
any, that are made based on the provisions of this amendment
will be recorded to goodwill, as incremental purchase price. We
have notified the former shareholders of MVC that the financial
targets for calendar 2008 and 2009 were not achieved and
therefore we have not recorded any obligation relative to these
measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Phonetic Systems Ltd.
(Phonetic) in February 2005, we agreed to make
contingent earn-out payments of $35.0 million upon
achievement of certain established financial and performance
targets, in accordance with the merger agreement. In December
2009, we paid $11.3 million to the former shareholders of
Phonetic in final settlement of the contingent earn-out
provisions; recording the amount paid as additional purchase
price related to the Phonetic acquisition.
Escrow
and Holdback Arrangements
In connection with certain of our acquisitions, we have placed
either cash or shares of our common stock in escrow to satisfy
any claims we may have. If no claims are made, the escrowed
amounts will be released to the former shareholders of the
acquired companies. Historically, under the previous accounting
guidance of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141), we could not make a
determination, beyond a reasonable doubt, whether the escrow
would become payable to the former shareholders of these
companies until the escrow period had expired. Accordingly,
these amounts were treated as contingent purchase price until it
was determined that the escrow was payable, at which time the
escrowed amounts would be recorded as additional purchase price
and allocated to goodwill. Under the revised accounting guidance
of ASC 805, escrow payments are generally considered part
of the initial purchase consideration and accounted for as
goodwill.
The following table summarizes the terms of the escrow
arrangements that were entered into under the guidance of
SFAS 141 that were not released as of March 31, 2010
(table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Escrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Payment
|
|
|
|
Release Date
|
|
|
Cash Payment
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
X-Solutions
|
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
eCopy
|
|
|
December 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six
months ended March 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,891,003
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
126,847
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
30,664
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(8,809
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,039,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded during the six months
ended March 31, 2010 consisted primarily of a
$13.1 million increase in the fair value estimate of
intangible assets from our fourth quarter fiscal 2009
acquisition and the $11.3 million Phonetic earn-out payment
and an $8.3 million increase to the SNAPin earn-out
liability discussed in Note 5 above. These increases were
partially offset by a $1.9 million reduction to the Philips
Speech Recognition Systems GMBH (PSRS) purchase
price based on a final working capital adjustment agreed between
us and the former shareholder of PSRS in November 2009.
Intangible assets consist of the following as of March 31,
2010 (table in thousands, except for years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Remaining Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
579,139
|
|
|
$
|
(194,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
384,550
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
368,995
|
|
|
|
(106,973
|
)
|
|
|
262,022
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks, and other
|
|
|
39,147
|
|
|
|
(9,339
|
)
|
|
|
29,808
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
(2,593
|
)
|
|
|
1,981
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
991,855
|
|
|
|
(313,494
|
)
|
|
|
678,361
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Tradename, indefinite life
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,800
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,019,655
|
|
|
$
|
(313,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
706,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2009, we entered into a joint marketing and selling
agreement with a third party and paid $7.0 million,
consisting of $2.0 million in cash and $5.0 million in
common stock, in consideration of that arrangement. We have
capitalized the $7.0 million payment as an intangible
asset, included in the tradenames, trademarks, and other
grouping above, and assigned a useful life of 3 years,
commensurate with the legal term of the rights in the
arrangement. In addition to the $7.0 million paid in June,
we also issued 879,567 shares of our common stock, valued
at $13.0 million, in December 2009 as an additional
payment, upon the third party meeting certain performance
criteria under the agreement by October 31, 2009. The
additional $13.0 million was capitalized and classified in
the same manner as the initial $7.0 million payment.
In March 2010, we acquired a portfolio of technology patents as
well as a royalty-free,
paid-up
perpetual source and object code license from third-parties for
$12.5 million, including $2.5 million in cash and
607,903 shares of our common stock valued at
$10.0 million. The estimated useful lives of the patent
portfolio and the software license are 13 years and
7 years, respectively. Both the patent portfolio and the
license have been included within the technology and patents
grouping above.
12
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
years, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010 (April 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
25,486
|
|
|
$
|
43,493
|
|
|
$
|
68,979
|
|
2011
|
|
|
49,902
|
|
|
|
80,021
|
|
|
|
129,923
|
|
2012
|
|
|
44,864
|
|
|
|
69,473
|
|
|
|
114,337
|
|
2013
|
|
|
38,906
|
|
|
|
55,070
|
|
|
|
93,976
|
|
2014
|
|
|
29,934
|
|
|
|
48,264
|
|
|
|
78,198
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
72,930
|
|
|
|
120,018
|
|
|
|
192,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
262,022
|
|
|
$
|
416,339
|
|
|
$
|
678,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of March 31,
2010, we have two outstanding interest rate swaps designated as
cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amount of
$200 million. The interest rates on these swaps are 2.7%
and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit Facility,
and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010, respectively.
As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized losses related to these swaps,
were $2.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively and
were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
in the accompanying balance sheets.
Forward
Currency Contracts Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
On October 1, 2009, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars with a total notional amount of
CAD$8.7 million. These contracts are designated as cash
flow hedges. At March 31, 2010, these contracts had an
aggregate remaining, unsettled notional amount of
CAD$2.1 million ($2.1 million at March 31, 2010
exchange rate). The contracts settle each month from
April 13, 2010 through July 13, 2010. As of
March 31, 2010, the aggregate cumulative unrealized gains
related to these contracts were $0.1 million and were
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
accompanying balance sheets.
On February 4, 2010, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Hungarian Forints (HUF) with a total notional amount
of HUF 688.0 million. These contracts are designated as
cash flow hedges. At March 31, 2010, these contracts had an
aggregate remaining, unsettled notional amount of HUF
479.0 million ($2.4 million at March 31, 2010
exchange rate). The contracts settle each month from
April 19, 2010 through October 18, 2010. As of
March 31, 2010, the aggregate cumulative unrealized gains
related to these contracts were less than $0.1 million.
Other
Derivative Activities
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we entered
into foreign currency forward contracts to offset foreign
currency exposure on the deferred acquisition payment of
44.3 million related to our acquisition of PSRS,
resulting in a net gain during that period of $8.0 million
included in other income (expense). The foreign currency
contracts matured and were settled on October 22, 2009. The
gain for the period from September 30, 2009 to settlement
on October 22, 2009 was $1.6 million, but was offset
in other income (expense), net by the loss resulting from the
corresponding change in the associated deferred acquisition
payment liability.
13
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In June 2009, we acquired certain intangible assets and issued
1,809,353 shares of our common stock, valued at
$25.0 million, as part of the total consideration. We also
issued an additional 315,790 shares of our common stock,
valued at $4.5 million, in June 2009 as a prepayment for
professional services. These shares issued are subject to
security price guarantees which are accounted for as
derivatives, and are being accounted for separately from their
host agreements due to the determination that such instruments
would not be considered equity instruments if freestanding. The
security price guarantees require a payment from either us to
the third party, or from the third party to us based upon the
difference between the price of our common stock on the issue
date and an average price of our common stock approximately six
months following the issue date. Changes in fair value of these
security price guarantees are reported in earnings each period
as non-operating income (expense) within other income (expense),
net. These security price guarantees expired and were settled in
December 2009 and January 2010. The third-party paid
$3.8 million to the Company during January 2010 in final
settlement thereof.
In October and December 2009, we issued 1,047,120 and
879,567 shares of our common stock in payment to a third
party, valued at $16.0 million and $13.0 million,
respectively. The $16.0 million payment was our first
payment in consideration for the research and development
services of the third party in connection with the
five-year
collaboration arrangement discussed in Note 2 above, while
the $13.0 million payment was final payment in respect of
the joint marketing and selling agreement with the same third
party discussed in Note 6 above. These shares are subject
to security price guarantees of the same nature as those
described above.
In March 2010, we issued 607,903 and 145,897 shares of our
common stock in payment to a third party, valued at
$10.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The
$10.0 million payment was for the purchase of the source
and object code software license discussed in Note 6 above,
while the $2.4 million payment was in respect of the
amendment of the
five-year
collaboration agreement discussed in Note 2 above. These
shares are subject to security price guarantees of the same
nature as those described above.
As of March 31, 2010, we have outstanding security price
guarantees relative to a total of 2,680,487 shares of our
common stock issued to a third party. For the three and six
months ended March 31, 2010, increases in fair value of
$2.6 and $4.7 million, respectively, related to the settled
and unsettled security price guarantees are reported in earnings
as non-operating income within other income (expense), net.
The following table provides a quantitative summary of the fair
value of our hedged and non-hedged derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 (table in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,682
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of non-hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,223
|
|
|
$
|
10,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Description
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities(a)
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset (liability) value of hedged derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,449
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair value of the interest rate swaps was classified in
other long-term liabilities as of September 30, 2009 as the
settlement date for the swaps was greater than twelve months
from the balance sheet date. |
The following tables summarize the activity of derivative
instruments for fiscal 2010 and 2009 (tables in thousands):
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
(386
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives
Designated as Hedges for the Six Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Location and Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
(386
|
)
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
$
|
(3,843
|
)
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Foreign currency contracts
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
Security price guarantees
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
2,636
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,708
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, and derivative instruments, are carried in the
consolidated financial statements at amounts that approximate
their fair value. Refer to Note 12 for discussion of fair
value of our long-term debt.
15
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an
asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Valuation techniques must maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When determining
the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required
to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most
advantageous market in which we would transact and consider
assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer
restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
ASC 820 (formerly referred to as SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements) establishes a value hierarchy based on
three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered
observable and the third is considered unobservable:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets which we can access.
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Observable inputs other than
those described as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs.
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at March 31, 2010 consisted of (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds(a)
|
|
$
|
375,770
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
375,770
|
|
US government agency securities(a)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Security price guarantees(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
385,770
|
|
|
$
|
3,348
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
389,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration(e)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
Interest rate swaps(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
3,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Money market funds and US government agency securities, included
in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheet,
are valued at quoted market prices in active markets. |
|
(b) |
|
The fair values of the interest rate swaps are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses that factor in observable market
inputs such as LIBOR based yield curves, forward
rates, and credit spreads. |
|
(c) |
|
The fair value of our foreign currency exchange contracts is the
intrinsic value of the contracts based on observable inputs for
similar derivative instruments in active markets or quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are
not active or are directly or indirectly observable. |
|
(d) |
|
The fair values of the security price guarantees are determined
using a modified Black-Scholes model, derived from observable
inputs such as US treasury interest rates, our common stock
price, and the volatility of our common stock. The valuation
model values both the put and call components of the guarantees
simultaneously, with the net value of those components
representing the fair value of each instrument. |
|
(e) |
|
The fair value of our contingent consideration arrangement is
determined based on the Companys evaluation as to the
probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved
based on expected future performance by the acquired entity, as
well as our common stock price since the contingent
consideration arrangement is payable in shares of our common
stock. |
16
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Level 3
Instruments
As of March 31, 2010, only our contingent consideration
arrangement, entered into during the second quarter of fiscal
2010, qualifies as a Level 3 instrument. Prior to the
second quarter fiscal 2010, we have not had any Level 3
instruments. $1.0 million of the fair value of the
instrument at March 31, 2010 was recorded as part of the
consideration transferred for one of our second quarter fiscal
2010 acquisitions. The remaining $0.2 million change in
fair value between the acquisition date and March 31, 2010
is being recorded as a gain to earnings through the
acquisition-related costs, net line-item in the
consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
9.
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
$
|
61,712
|
|
|
$
|
52,600
|
|
Sales and marketing incentives
|
|
|
38,677
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
Cost of revenue related liabilities
|
|
|
11,375
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
8,945
|
|
Sales and other taxes payable
|
|
|
7,476
|
|
|
|
5,913
|
|
Acquisition costs and liabilities
|
|
|
5,692
|
|
|
|
8,522
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
7,185
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,518
|
|
|
|
8,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
148,976
|
|
|
$
|
104,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Accrued
Business Combination Costs
|
The activity for the six months ended March 31, 2010,
relating to all facilities and personnel recorded in accrued
business combination costs, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
34,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
37,048
|
|
Charged to goodwill
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(759
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Charged to restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
Charged to interest expense
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
Cash payments, net of sublease receipts
|
|
|
(5,516
|
)
|
|
|
(1,578
|
)
|
|
|
(7,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
29,128
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
29,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
9,939
|
|
|
$
|
12,144
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
19,349
|
|
|
|
24,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,288
|
|
|
$
|
37,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges, net
|
The following table sets forth the six months ended
March 31, 2010 accrual activity relating to restructuring
and other charges (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
5,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
13,546
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(6,862
|
)
|
|
|
(6,856
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,820
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
|
(4,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net
restructuring and other charges of $13.0 million, which
consisted primarily of $5.4 million related to the
elimination of approximately 95 personnel across multiple
functions within our company, including acquired entities, and a
$6.9 million write-off of previously capitalized patent
defense costs as a result of unsuccessful litigation, partially
offset by $0.6 million in reversals of previously recorded
facilities abandonment charges, included in the table above in
Note 10, as a result of entering into a definitive
sub-lease
agreement.
|
|
12.
|
Credit
Facilities and Debt
|
At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, we had the
following borrowing obligations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Debentures, net of unamortized discount
of $40.7 million and $44.9 million, respectively
|
|
$
|
209,320
|
|
|
$
|
205,064
|
|
Credit Facility
|
|
|
646,913
|
|
|
|
650,263
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
Other
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
858,536
|
|
|
|
855,760
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
8,318
|
|
|
|
6,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
850,218
|
|
|
$
|
848,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt approximated
$912.9 million at March 31, 2010 and
$893.2 million at September 30, 2009. These fair value
amounts represent the value at which our lenders could trade our
debt within the financial markets, and do not represent the
settlement value of these long-term debt liabilities to us at
each reporting date. The fair value of these long-term debt
issues will continue to fluctuate each period based on
fluctuations in market interest rates, and these fluctuations
may have little to no correlation to our outstanding debt
balances. The increase in fair value from September 30,
2009 to March 31, 2010 is generally attributable to the
overall improvement in the debt markets, as well as some impact
from the recent upgrade to our corporate credit rating. The term
loan portion of our Credit Facility is traded and the fair
values are based upon traded prices as of the reporting dates.
The fair values of the 2.75% Convertible Debentures were
estimated using the averages of the bid and ask trading quotes
as of each respective reporting date. We had no outstanding
balance on the revolving credit line portion of our Credit
Facility. Our capital lease obligations and other debt are not
traded and the fair values of these instruments are assumed to
approximate their carrying values as of March 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2009.
18
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in August 2027. As of
March 31, 2010, no conversion triggers were met. If the
conversion triggers were met, we could be required to repay all
or some of the principal amount in cash prior to maturity.
Adoption
of
ASC 470-20
As discussed in Note 2 above, on October 1, 2009, we
adopted
ASC 470-20,
which has been applied retrospectively to all periods presented
in our consolidated financial statements.
ASC 470-20
is applicable to our 2.75% Convertible Debentures as we
have the right to deliver cash in lieu of shares of our common
stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, upon
conversion for each of these issuances.
We recognized total interest expense of approximately $10.2 and
$20.4 million during the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010, respectively, and $11.8 and
$26.7 million during the three and six months ended
March 31, 2009 related to the contractual interest coupon
on all our outstanding long-term debt, amortization of debt
issuance costs, and amortization of the discount on the
liability component of our 2.75% Convertible Debentures.
The effective interest rate on the liability component of our
2.75% Convertible Debentures, including both the cash and
non-cash interest components, was approximately 7% during the
three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. We are
amortizing the discount on the liability component of our
2.75% Convertible Debentures through August 2014, which is
the first put date available to the holders of the notes.
The carrying amount of the equity component, principal amount of
the liability component, unamortized debt discount related to
the liability component and net carrying amount of the liability
component of our debt subject to
ASC 470-20
as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Carrying amount of equity component (conversion options)
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
$
|
54,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of liability component
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
Unamortized discount related to liability component
|
|
|
(40,680
|
)
|
|
|
(44,936
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount of liability component
|
|
$
|
209,320
|
|
|
$
|
205,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility which consists of a $75 million
revolving credit line, reduced by outstanding letters of credit,
a $355 million term loan entered into on March 31,
2006, a $90 million term loan entered into on April 5,
2007 and a $225 million term loan entered into on
August 24, 2007 (collectively the Credit
Facility). The term loans are due March 2013 and the
revolving credit line is due March 2012. As of March 31,
2010, there were $16.1 million of letters of credit issued
under the revolving credit line and there were no other
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line. As of
March 31, 2010, we are in compliance with the covenants
under the Credit Facility.
As of March 31, 2010, based on our leverage ratio, the
applicable margin for our term loan was 1.00% for base rate
borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. This results in
an effective interest rate of 2.23%. No payments under the
excess cash flow sweep provision were due in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 as no excess cash flow, as defined, was generated
in fiscal 2009. At the current time, we are unable to predict
the amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow
19
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
sweep provisions. If only the minimum required repayments are
made, the annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans
repaid would be as follows (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010 (April 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013 (maturity)
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
646,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and
diluted net income per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009. The table excludes reconciliation
for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 due to the
Companys net loss position for those periods (table in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
Less: Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
basic
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
diluted
|
|
$
|
(15,396
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
250,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
250,656
|
|
Weighed average effect of dilutive common equivalent shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562
|
|
Employee stock compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,291
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
Other contingently issuable shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
284,994
|
|
|
|
269,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per share if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares
aggregating to 21.8 million and 23.6 million shares
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010,
respectively, and 14.8 million and 34.4 million shares
for
20
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the three and six months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
net loss per share because their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
In March 2010, we issued 607,903 and 145,897 shares of our
common stock in payment to a third party, valued at
$10.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The
$10.0 million payment was for the purchase of the source
and object code software license discussed in Note 6 above,
while the $2.4 million payment was in respect of the
amendment of the
five-year
collaboration agreement discussed in Note 2 above.
In February 2010, we issued 1.1 million shares of our
common stock, valued at $18.0 million, as partial
consideration for our second quarter fiscal 2010 acquisitions
discussed in Note 4 above.
In October and December 2009, we issued 1,047,120 and
879,567 shares of our common stock in payment to a third
party, valued at $16.0 million and $13.0 million,
respectively, based on the price of our common stock at closing
on the respective issuance dates. The $16.0 million payment
was our first payment in connection with the five-year
collaboration arrangement discussed in Note 2 above, while
the $13.0 million payment was final payment in respect of
the joint marketing and selling agreement with the same third
party discussed in Note 6 above.
In December 2009, we issued 2.3 million shares of our
common stock, valued at $36.4 million, as partial
consideration for the acquisition of SpinVox Limited discussed
in Note 4 above.
On November 15, 2004, in connection with our acquisition of
Phonetic, we issued unvested warrants to purchase
750,000 shares of our common stock that were to vest, if at
all, upon the achievement of certain performance targets. In
December 2009, as disclosed in Note 5, we paid
$11.3 million in cash to the former shareholders of
Phonetic in final settlement of the contingent earn-out
provisions related to that acquisition. The 750,000 warrants did
not vest and were cancelled as a result of the final settlement.
None of the 750,000 warrants remain outstanding at
March 31, 2010.
On March 19, 2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus had
agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of and warrants for
our common stock held by Xerox Corporation for approximately
$80.0 million. In connection with this transaction, Warburg
Pincus acquired new warrants to purchase 2.5 million
additional shares of our common stock for total consideration of
$0.6 million. The warrants had a six-year life and an
exercise price of $4.94 per share. In April 2010, all
2.5 million of these common stock warrants were exercised,
with total cash proceeds to the Company of $12.4 million.
|
|
15.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
We recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
service period. Our share-based awards are accounted for as
equity instruments. The amounts included in the consolidated
statements of operations relating to stock-based compensation
are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,937
|
|
|
|
4,449
|
|
|
|
5,627
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
6,228
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
13,559
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10,386
|
|
|
|
5,424
|
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,708
|
|
|
$
|
18,015
|
|
|
$
|
44,774
|
|
|
$
|
35,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Options
The table below summarizes activity relating to stock options
for the six months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
Intrinsic Value(1)
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
13,553,866
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,577,795
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(259,553
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(81,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
11,835,107
|
|
|
$
|
8.43
|
|
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
|
$
|
98.0 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
8,461,430
|
|
|
$
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
3.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
84.2 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
11,002,302
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
3.7 years
|
|
|
$
|
60.1 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference, if any, between the closing market
value of our common stock on March 31, 2010 ($16.64) and
the exercise price of the underlying options. |
As of March 31, 2010, the total unamortized fair value of
stock options was $19.4 million with a weighted average
remaining recognition period of 1.1 years. A summary of
weighted-average grant-date fair value and intrinsic value of
stock options exercised is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
5.90
|
|
|
$
|
13.78
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised (in millions)
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the
grant-date fair value of an award. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, we did not grant any new options. The fair
value of the stock options granted and unvested options assumed
from acquisitions during the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010 and the six months ended March 31, 2009
were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
22
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted
Units
Restricted Units are not included in issued and outstanding
common stock until the shares are vested and released. The table
below summarizes activity relating to Restricted Units for the
six months ending March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
Restricted Units
|
|
|
|
Contingent Awards
|
|
|
Time-Based Awards
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
2,840,673
|
|
|
|
8,755,330
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,288,743
|
|
|
|
2,060,366
|
|
Earned/released
|
|
|
(740,224
|
)
|
|
|
(1,658,245
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(530,367
|
)
|
|
|
(505,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,858,825
|
|
|
|
8,651,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding
Restricted Units
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding Restricted Units(1)
|
|
$
|
47.6 million
|
|
|
$
|
144.0 million
|
|
Restricted Units vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
2,534,618
|
|
|
|
7,471,287
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term of Restricted Units
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of Restricted Units vested and
expected to vest(1)
|
|
$
|
42.2 million
|
|
|
$
|
124.3 million
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in this table was calculated based
on the positive difference between the closing market value of
our common stock on March 31, 2010 ($16.64) and the
exercise price of the underlying Restricted Units. |
The purchase price for vested Restricted Units is $0.001 per
share. As of March 31, 2010, unearned stock-based
compensation expense related to all unvested Restricted Units is
$118.9 million, which will, based on expectations of future
performance vesting criteria, where applicable, be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
A summary of weighted-average grant-date fair value, including
those assumed in respective periods, and intrinsic value of all
Restricted Units vested is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
Six Months Ended,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
15.50
|
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
15.05
|
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
Total intrinsic value of shares vested (in millions)
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
23
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized gain
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate was (17.5)% and (23.3)% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
(15.4)% and (101.8)% for the six months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Included in the tax provision for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $4.0 million
in foreign income tax provision, reduced by a $1.4 million
discrete tax benefit resulting from certain international
research and development tax credits.
Included in the tax provision for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 was $5.6 million in foreign income tax
provision, reduced by the $1.4 million tax benefit
discussed above and a $1.0 million tax benefit resulting
from the favorable settlement of a state tax penalty related to
our acquisition of eScription. No tax benefit has been
recognized for the U.S. losses in either the three or six
month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as the
realization of such tax benefit is not more likely than not.
At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the
liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax
positions was $12.3 million and $12.1 million,
respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to accrued
interest. We do not expect a significant change in the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The following table outlines our gross future minimum payments
under all non-cancelable operating leases as of March 31,
2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Leases Under
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010 (April 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
10,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
$
|
6,783
|
|
|
$
|
19,098
|
|
2011
|
|
|
19,568
|
|
|
|
2,591
|
|
|
|
13,929
|
|
|
|
36,088
|
|
2012
|
|
|
17,577
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
12,284
|
|
|
|
31,202
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15,784
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
2014
|
|
|
12,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
15,309
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
39,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
|
|
42,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
115,531
|
|
|
$
|
6,261
|
|
|
$
|
40,939
|
|
|
$
|
162,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
At March 31, 2010, we have subleased certain office space
that is included in the above table to third parties. Total
sublease income under contractual terms is $15.6 million
and ranges from approximately $1.5 million to
$4.1 million on an annual basis through February 2016.
Litigation
and Other Claims
Like many companies in the software industry, we have, from time
to time, been notified of claims that we may be infringing, or
contributing to the infringement of, the intellectual property
rights of others. These claims have been referred to counsel,
and they are in various stages of evaluation and negotiation. If
it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses for
these intellectual property rights. There is no assurance that
licenses will be offered by all claimants, that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to us or that in all cases
the dispute will be resolved without litigation, which may be
time consuming and expensive, and may result in injunctive
relief or the payment of damages by us.
Vianix LLC has filed three legal actions against us, consisting
of two breach of contract actions and a copyright infringement
claim. It is too early for us to reach a conclusion as to the
ultimate outcome or proposed settlement of these actions or to
estimate the potential loss that could result from a settlement
or adverse judgment against us in two of the three matters. In
the third matter, we believe our maximum potential exposure to
be immaterial. We have not accrued any liability for these
actions as we continue to believe that we have substantial
defenses against these claims, and intend to defend them
vigorously.
We do not believe that the final outcome of the above litigation
matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations. However, even if our defense
is successful, the litigation could require significant
management time and will be costly. Should we not prevail, our
operating results, financial position and cash flows could be
adversely impacted.
Guarantees
and Other
We include indemnification provisions in the contracts we enter
into with customers and business partners. Generally, these
provisions require us to defend claims arising out of our
products infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights, breach of contractual obligations
and/or
unlawful or otherwise culpable conduct. The indemnity
obligations generally cover damages, costs and attorneys
fees arising out of such claims. In most, but not all, cases,
our total liability under such provisions is limited to either
the value of the contract or a specified, agreed upon amount. In
some cases our total liability under such provisions is
unlimited. In many, but not all, cases, the term of the
indemnity provision is perpetual. While the maximum potential
amount of future payments we could be required to make under all
the indemnification provisions is unlimited, we believe the
estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal due to the
low frequency with which these provisions have been triggered.
We indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by law. These agreements, among other things,
indemnify directors and officers for expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlement amounts incurred by such persons in
their capacity as a director or officer of the company,
regardless of whether the individual is serving in any such
capacity at the time the liability or expense is incurred.
Additionally, in connection with certain acquisitions we have
agreed to indemnify the former officers and members of the
boards of directors of those companies, on similar terms as
described above, for a period of six years from the acquisition
date. In certain cases we purchase director and officer
insurance policies related to these obligations, which fully
cover the six year periods. To the extent that we do not
purchase a director and officer insurance policy for the full
period of any contractual indemnification, we would be required
to pay for costs incurred, if any, as described above.
At March 31, 2010, we have $2.8 million of
non-cancelable purchase commitments for inventory to fulfill
customers orders currently scheduled in our backlog.
25
NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Segment
and Geographic Information and Significant Customers
|
We follow the provisions of ASC 280 (formerly referred to
as SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information), which establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments.
ASC 280 also established standards for disclosures about
products, services and geographic areas. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and evaluated regularly by
the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker (CODM) is the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
We have several customer-facing market groups that oversee the
core markets where we conduct business. These groups were
referred to as Mobile-Enterprise, Healthcare-Dictation, and
Imaging. Each of these market groups has a president or general
manager who has direct responsibility and oversight related to
go-to-market
strategies and plans, product management and product marketing
activities. These groups do not directly manage centralized or
shared resources or the allocation decisions regarding the
activities related to these functions, which include sales and
sales operations, certain research and development initiatives,
business development and all general and administrative
activities. Our CODM directly oversees each of the presidents or
general managers, as well as each of the functions that provide
the shared and centralized activities noted above. To manage the
business, allocate resources and assess performance, the CODM
primarily reviews revenue data by market group, while reviewing
gross margins, operating margins, and other measures of income
or loss on a consolidated basis. Thus, we have determined that
we operate in one segment.
The following table presents revenue information for our three
core markets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise
|
|
$
|
136,044
|
|
|
$
|
114,494
|
|
|
$
|
261,081
|
|
|
$
|
214,328
|
|
Healthcare-Dictation
|
|
|
118,492
|
|
|
|
100,578
|
|
|
|
238,437
|
|
|
|
200,546
|
|
Imaging
|
|
|
18,469
|
|
|
|
14,073
|
|
|
|
36,464
|
|
|
|
31,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
273,005
|
|
|
$
|
229,145
|
|
|
$
|
535,982
|
|
|
$
|
445,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States provided greater than
10% of our total revenue. Revenue, classified by the major
geographic areas in which our customers are located, was as
follows (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
187,544
|
|
|
$
|
167,033
|
|
|
$
|
374,042
|
|
|
$
|
334,465
|
|
International
|
|
|
85,461
|
|
|
|
62,112
|
|
|
|
161,940
|
|
|
|
111,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
273,005
|
|
|
$
|
229,145
|
|
|
$
|
535,982
|
|
|
$
|
445,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No country outside of the United States held greater than 10% of
our long-lived or total assets. Our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets and goodwill, were located as follows (table
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,432,989
|
|
|
$
|
2,395,773
|
|
International
|
|
|
443,666
|
|
|
|
307,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,876,655
|
|
|
$
|
2,703,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
A member of our Board of Directors is also a partner at Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, a
law firm that provides professional services to us. These
services may from
time-to-time
include contingent fee arrangements. We paid Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich & Rosati for professional services
$1.1 million and $2.0 million for the three and six
months ended March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, we had $1.4 million and
$1.7 million, respectively, included in accounts payable
and accrued expenses to Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati.
.
27
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to help the reader understand the results of operations
and financial condition of our business. Managements
Discussion and Analysis is provided as a supplement to, and
should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements,
including predictions regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenue, cost of revenue, research and development
expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses,
amortization of intangible assets and gross margin;
|
|
|
|
our strategy relating to our core markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential of future product releases;
|
|
|
|
our product development plans and investments in research and
development;
|
|
|
|
future acquisitions, and anticipated benefits from pending and
prior acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
international operations and localized versions of our
products; and
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and litigation matters.
|
You can identify these and other forward-looking statements by
the use of words such as may, will,
should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts,
intends, potential, continue
or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions
underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements. Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the
risks described in Item 1A Risk
Factors of Part II and elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any
revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this document.
OVERVIEW
Nuance Communications, Inc. is a leading provider of speech,
imaging and keypad solutions for businesses, organizations and
consumers around the world. Our technologies, applications and
services make the user experience more compelling by
transforming the way people interact with devices and systems,
and how they create, share and use documents. Our solutions are
used every day by millions of people and thousands of businesses
for tasks and services such as requesting information from a
phone-based self-service solution, dictating medical records,
searching the mobile Web by voice, entering a destination into a
navigation system, or working with PDF documents. Our solutions
help make these interactions, tasks and experiences more
productive, compelling and efficient.
Our technologies address our three core markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise. We deliver a portfolio of
solutions that improve the experience of customer
communications, mobile interactions and personal productivity.
Combining our expertise in enterprise and mobile solutions
allows us to help consumers, businesses and manufacturers more
effectively utilize mobile devices for accessing an array of
content, services and capabilities. Our enterprise solutions
help automate a wide range of customer services and business
processes in a variety of information and process-intensive
vertical markets such as telecommunications, financial services,
utilities, travel and entertainment, and government. Our mobile
solutions add voice control and texting capabilities to mobile
devices and services, allowing people to more easily dial a
mobile phone, enter destination information into an automotive
navigation system, dictate a text message or have emails and
screen information read aloud.
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare-Dictation. Our healthcare solutions
comprise a portfolio of speech-driven clinical documentation and
communication solutions that help healthcare provider
organizations reduce operating costs, increase reimbursement,
and enhance patient care and safety. Our solutions automate the
input and management of medical information and are used by many
of the largest hospitals in the United States. We offer a
variety of different solutions and deployment options to address
the specific requirements of different healthcare provider
organizations. Our Dragon NaturallySpeaking family of products
help people and businesses increase productivity by using speech
to create documents, streamline repetitive and complex tasks,
input data, complete forms and automate manual transcription
processes. Our Dragon Medical solution is a desktop application
that provides front-end speech recognition that allows smaller
groups of physicians and clinicians to create and navigate
medical records.
|
|
|
|
Imaging. Our PDF and document imaging
solutions reduce the time and cost associated with creating,
using and sharing documents. Our solutions benefit from the
widespread adoption of the PDF format and the increasing demand
for networked solutions for managing electronic documents. Our
solutions are used by millions of professionals and within large
enterprises.
|
We leverage our global professional services organization and
our network of partners to design and deploy innovative
solutions for businesses and organizations around the globe. We
market and distribute our products through a global network of
resellers, including system integrators, independent software
vendors, value-added resellers, hardware vendors,
telecommunications carriers and distributors, and also sell
directly through a dedicated sales force and through our
e-commerce
website.
Confronted by dramatic increases in electronic information,
consumers, business personnel and healthcare professionals must
use a variety of resources to retrieve information, transcribe
patient records, conduct transactions and perform other
job-related functions. We believe that the power of our
solutions can transform the way people use the Internet,
telecommunications systems, electronic medical records, wireless
and mobile networks and related corporate infrastructure to
conduct business.
We have built a world-class portfolio of intellectual property,
technologies, applications and solutions through both internal
development and acquisitions. We expect to continue to pursue
opportunities to broaden these assets and expand our customer
base through acquisitions. In evaluating the financial condition
and operating performance of our business, management focuses on
revenue, earnings, gross margins, operating margins and cash
flow from operations. A summary of these key financial metrics
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, as
compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased by $43.9 million to
$273.0 million;
|
|
|
|
Net income/loss decreased by $20.7 million to a
$15.4 million net loss from $5.3 million in net income;
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased by 0.7 percentage points to 62.1%;
|
|
|
|
Operating margins decreased to (2.3)% from 6.7%; and
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 was $120.6 million, a decrease of
$10.0 million from the same period in the prior fiscal year.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(GAAP) require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments, including
those related to: revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns; the costs to complete the development of
custom software applications; the valuation of goodwill,
intangible assets and tangible long-lived assets; accounting for
business combinations; share-based payments; valuation of
derivative instruments; accounting for income taxes and related
valuation allowances and loss contingencies. Our management
bases its estimates on
29
historical experience, market participant fair value
considerations and various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Information about those accounting policies we deem to be
critical to our financial reporting may be found in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. There have
been no significant changes or additions to our critical
accounting policies from those disclosed in our annual report
other than those changes in our policies for accounting for
business combinations resulting from our adoption of
ASC 805 [formerly referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(Revised),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R)], as
described in Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Refer to Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, as a percentage of total revenue,
certain selected financial data for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (as adjusted for the
retrospective application of FASB
ASC 470-20).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended March 30,
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
Professional services, subscription and hosting
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product and licensing
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Professional services, subscription and hosting
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
Maintenance and support
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Restructuring and other charges, net
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Total
Revenue
The following tables show total revenue from our three core
market groups and revenue by geographic location, based on the
location of our customers, in dollars and percentage change
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Mobile-Enterprise
|
|
$
|
136.0
|
|
|
$
|
114.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
261.1
|
|
|
$
|
214.3
|
|
|
$
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Healthcare-Dictation
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
100.6
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
238.4
|
|
|
|
200.6
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
Imaging
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
273.0
|
|
|
$
|
229.1
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
536.0
|
|
|
$
|
446.0
|
|
|
$
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
187.5
|
|
|
$
|
167.0
|
|
|
$
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
374.1
|
|
|
$
|
334.5
|
|
|
$
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
85.5
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
161.9
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
273.0
|
|
|
$
|
229.1
|
|
|
$
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
536.0
|
|
|
$
|
446.0
|
|
|
$
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total revenue for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010, as compared to the same periods ended
March 31, 2009, was driven by a combination of organic
growth and contributions from our acquisitions.
Mobile-Enterprise revenue increased primarily due to growth in
sales of our predictive text products, as well as sales of our
embedded speech products for the automotive market.
Healthcare-Dictation revenue increased primarily due to organic
growth from our SpeechMagic solutions, Dragon Naturally Speaking
products and iChart and eScription transcription services.
Imaging revenue increased primarily as a result of contributions
from our acquisitions of X-Solutions Group B.V.
(X-Solutions) and eCopy, Inc. (eCopy).
Based on the location of our customers, the geographic split for
the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 was 69% and
70%, respectively, of total revenue in the United States and 31%
and 30%, respectively, internationally. This represents a shift
in revenues toward international as compared to 73% and 75% of
total revenue in the United States and 27% and 25%
internationally for the same periods in fiscal 2009. The
increase in the proportion of revenue generated internationally
during the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared to the same periods in the prior year was primarily due
to contributions from our fiscal 2009 acquisitions and our
acquisition of SpinVox, as well as the increase in revenue
contributions from our predictive text products and SpeechMagic
solutions, which are sold predominantly outside the United
States.
Product
and Licensing Revenue
Product and licensing revenue primarily consists of sales and
licenses of our technology. The following table shows product
and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
113.2
|
|
|
$
|
87.0
|
|
|
$
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
226.4
|
|
|
$
|
172.6
|
|
|
$
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, consisted of a
$12.3 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise revenue
primarily due to growth in sales of our predictive text
products, as well as sales of our embedded speech products for
the automotive market, and partially offset by decreases in
sales of our licenses of customer care solutions.
Healthcare-Dictation revenue increased $10.0 million,
primarily driven by increased sales of our SpeechMagic solutions
and Dragon Naturally Speaking products. Imaging revenue
increased $4.0 million primarily due to contributions from
our acquisitions of X-Solutions and eCopy and growth in sales of
our core imaging products. The growth in our product and
licensing revenue streams outpaced the relative growth of our
other revenue types, resulting in the 3.5 percentage point
increase as a percent of total revenue.
31
The increase in product and licensing revenue for the six months
ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months ended
March 31, 2009, consisted of a $30.7 million increase
in Mobile-Enterprise revenue primarily due to growth in sales of
our predictive text products, as well as sales of our embedded
speech products for the automotive market. Healthcare-Dictation
revenue increased $18.8 million primarily as a result of
increased sales of our SpeechMagic solutions and Dragon
Naturally Speaking products. Imaging revenue increased
$4.3 million primarily due to contributions from our
acquisitions of eCopy and X-Solutions. The growth in our product
and licensing revenue streams outpaced the relative growth of
our other revenue types, resulting in the 3.6 percentage
point increase as a percent of total revenue.
Professional
Services and Hosting Revenue
Professional services revenue primarily consists of consulting,
implementation and training services for speech customers.
Hosting revenue primarily relates to delivering hosted
transcription and dictation services over a specified term, as
well as self-service, on-demand offerings to carriers and
enterprises. The following table shows professional services and
hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of total revenue
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
116.2
|
|
|
$
|
103.0
|
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
219.9
|
|
|
$
|
193.2
|
|
|
$
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2009, was driven by a
$6.6 million increase in Healthcare-Dictation revenues
resulting largely from growth of our iChart and eScription
transcription services. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010, the annualized line run-rate in our
healthcare on-demand business was approximately
3.099 billion lines per year, up 15% from
2.686 billion lines per year for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The annualized line run-rate is determined
by the number of lines actually billed in a given quarter,
multiplied by four. Mobile-Enterprise revenue increased
$6.6 million primarily due to contributions from our
acquisition of SpinVox and growth in our enterprise on-demand
solutions, partially offset by a decrease in enterprise
professional services revenues due primarily to the timing of
revenue recognition related to
set-up and
implementation professional services. Our enterprise
professional services hours backlog was 266,777 hours as of
March 31, 2010, compared with 179,176 hours as of
March 31, 2009. Enterprise professional services backlog
hours reflect the accumulated estimated professional services
hours necessary to fulfill all of our existing, executed
professional services contracts within the enterprise business,
including those that are cancelable by customers, based on the
original estimate of hours sold. As a percentage of total
revenue, professional services and hosting revenue decreased
2.5 percentage points as compared to the corresponding
period in the prior year, primarily due to the accelerated
growth in the fiscal second quarter of product and licensing
revenue relative to professional services and hosting revenue.
The increase in professional services and hosting revenue for
the six months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six
months ended March 31, 2009, was driven by a
$15.9 million increase in Healthcare-Dictation revenues
resulting largely from growth of our iChart and eScription
transcription services. During the six months ended
March 31, 2010, the number of healthcare transcription
lines processed increased as compared to the corresponding
period in the prior year. Mobile-Enterprise revenue increased
$10.6 million, primarily due to contributions from our
acquisition of SpinVox and growth in our enterprise on-demand
and mobile professional services solutions. As a percentage of
total revenue, professional services and hosting revenue
decreased 2.3 percentage points as compared to the
corresponding period in the prior year, primarily due to the
strong growth in the fiscal first half of product and licensing
revenue relative to professional services and hosting revenue.
32
Maintenance
and Support Revenue
Maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of technical
support and maintenance services. The following table shows
maintenance and support revenue, in dollars and as a percentage
of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
43.6
|
|
|
$
|
39.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
89.7
|
|
|
$
|
80.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, consisted primarily of a
$2.7 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise revenue, driven
by continued organic growth, and a $1.4 million increase
related to the expansion of our current installed base of
Healthcare-Dictation solutions.
The increase in maintenance and support revenue for the six
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months
ended March 31, 2009, consisted primarily of a
$5.5 million increase in Mobile-Enterprise revenue, driven
by continued organic growth, and a $3.2 million increase
related to the expansion of our current installed base of
Healthcare-Dictation solutions.
COSTS AND
EXPENSES
Cost of
Product and Licensing Revenue
Cost of product and licensing revenue primarily consists of
material and fulfillment costs, manufacturing and operations
costs and third-party royalty expenses. The following table
shows cost of product and licensing revenue, in dollars and as a
percentage of product and licensing revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of product and licensing revenue
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.3
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of product and licensing revenue
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to increased
costs as a result of growth in our Healthcare-Dictation and
Imaging product and licensing revenues.
The increase in cost of product and licensing revenue for the
six months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six
months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to increased
costs as a result of growth in our Healthcare-Dictation and
Mobile-Enterprise product and licensing revenues.
Cost of
Professional Services and Hosting Revenue
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue primarily
consists of compensation for consulting personnel, outside
consultants and overhead, as well as the hardware and
communications fees that support our hosted, on-
33
demand solutions. The following table shows cost of professional
services and hosting revenue, in dollars and as a percentage of
professional services and hosting revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
$
|
73.0
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
|
$
|
121.3
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of professional services and hosting revenue
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
61.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.4
|
%
|
|
|
62.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009, was
primarily due to increases in Mobile-Enterprise costs resulting
from our acquisition of SpinVox.
The increase in cost of professional services and hosting
revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2010, as
compared to the six months ended March 31, 2009, was
primarily due to increases in Mobile-Enterprise costs resulting
primarily from our acquisition of SpinVox.
Cost of
Maintenance and Support Revenue
Cost of maintenance and support revenue primarily consists of
compensation for product support personnel and overhead. The
following table shows cost of maintenance and support revenue,
in dollars and as a percentage of maintenance and support
revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of maintenance and support revenue
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margins relative to our maintenance and support services
remained relatively constant across all periods presented.
Aggregate cost increases for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010, as compared to the comparable periods in
the prior year, were attributable to increases in our installed
base of solutions.
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense primarily consists of salaries,
benefits and overhead relating to engineering staff. The
following table shows research and development expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total research and development expense
|
|
$
|
37.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
74.9
|
|
|
$
|
57.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in research and development expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was largely attributable to a
$5.0 million increase in compensation expense from
additional headcount and fees from professional services
resulting from our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal
2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010. In addition, there was a
$4.0 million increase in research and
34
development expense recorded for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 for services from a third party related to
the collaboration agreement discussed in Note 2 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The increase in research and development expense for the six
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months
ended March 31, 2009, was largely attributable to the
$8.0 million in research and development expense recorded
for the six months ended March 31, 2010 for services from a
third party related to the collaboration agreement discussed in
Note 2 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements,
as well as a $7.5 million increase in compensation expense
from additional headcount and fees from professional services
resulting from our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal
2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010.
Sales and
Marketing Expense
Sales and marketing expense includes salaries and benefits,
commissions, advertising, direct mail, public relations,
tradeshow costs and other costs of marketing programs, travel
expenses associated with our sales organization and overhead.
The following table shows sales and marketing expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
$
|
50.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
129.5
|
|
|
$
|
110.6
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to a
$12.9 million increase in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions and travel expenses as they relate to
overall revenue growth. The increase in compensation and other
variable costs was also attributable to the additional headcount
from our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal 2009 and
the first half of fiscal 2010.
The increase in sales and marketing expense for the six months
ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months ended
March 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to a
$19.0 million increase in compensation and other variable
costs, such as commissions and travel expenses as they relate to
overall revenue growth. The increase in compensation and other
variable costs was also attributable to the additional headcount
from our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal 2009 and
the first half of fiscal 2010.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense primarily consists of
personnel costs for administration, finance, human resources,
information systems, facilities and general management, fees for
external professional advisors including accountants and
attorneys, insurance, and provisions for doubtful accounts. The
following table shows general and administrative expense, in
dollars and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
$
|
25.2
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
58.8
|
|
|
$
|
50.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to
increased compensation costs of $6.8 million associated
with our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal 2009 and
the first half of fiscal 2010.
35
The increase in general and administrative expense for the six
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months
ended March 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to
increased compensation costs of $9.2 million associated
with our acquisitions during the second half of fiscal 2009 and
the first half of fiscal 2010.
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization of acquired patents and core and completed
technology are included in cost of revenue and the amortization
of acquired customer and contractual relationships, non-compete
agreements, acquired tradenames and trademarks, and other
intangibles are included in operating expenses. Customer
relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis based upon
the pattern in which the economic benefits of the customer
relationships are being realized. Other identifiable intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was recorded as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
$
|
28.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
67.5
|
|
|
$
|
53.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in amortization of intangible assets for the three
and six months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
three and six months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily
attributable to the amortization of acquired intangible assets
from our business acquisitions during the third and fourth
quarters of fiscal 2009 and our acquisition of SpinVox during
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Amortization expense for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2010 also increased
over the corresponding periods in fiscal 2009 due to our
acquisition of technology and other intangible assets from other
third-parties during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and the
first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Acquisition-Related
Costs, Net
Acquisition-related costs include those costs related to
business and other acquisitions, including potential
acquisitions. These costs consist of transition and integration
costs, including retention payments, transitional employee costs
and earn-out payments treated as compensation expense, as well
as the costs of integration-related services provided by
third-parties; professional service fees, including direct
third-party costs of the transaction and post-acquisition legal
and other professional service fees associated with disputes and
regulatory matters related to acquired entities; and adjustments
to acquisition-related items that are required to be marked to
fair value each reporting period, such as contingent
consideration, and other items related to acquisitions for which
the measurement period has ended. Acquisition-related costs were
recorded as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Transition and integration costs
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
766.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
352.6
|
%
|
Professional service fees
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(25.7
|
)%
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
Acquisition-related adjustments
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
125.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
142.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acquisition-related costs, net
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
142.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
126.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily attributable to
increased transitional employee costs from our acquisitions of
eCopy and SpinVox.
36
The increase in acquisition-related costs, net for the six
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the six months
ended March 31, 2009, was largely a result of our adoption
on October 1, 2009 of the new accounting guidance relative
to business combinations in FASB ASC 805. We recognized
approximately $7.8 million in transaction costs, included
within professional service fees above, during the six months
ended March 31, 2010 that would have been capitalized in
periods prior to our adoption of ASC 805, including
approximately $2.2 million that had been capitalized as of
September 30, 2009 related to costs incurred in prior
periods that was required to be expensed upon our adoption of
ASC 805. The remainder of the increase was primarily
attributable to increased transition costs for acquired
employees from our acquisitions during the third and fourth
quarters of fiscal 2009 and our acquisition of SpinVox during
the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Restructuring
and Other Charges, Net
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded net
restructuring and other charges of $12.4 million, which
consisted primarily of $5.4 million related to the
elimination of approximately 55 personnel, primarily from
acquired entities, and a $6.9 million write-off of
previously capitalized patent defense costs as a result of
unsuccessful litigation. For the three months ended
December 31, 2009, we recorded net restructuring and other
charges of $0.6 million, which consisted of
$1.2 million related to the elimination of approximately
40 personnel across multiple functions within our company,
partially offset by $0.6 million in reversals of previously
recorded facilities abandonment charges as a result of entering
into a definitive
sub-lease
agreement for one of our leased properties. Excluding the
$6.9 million current quarter write-off, restructuring
charges have generally increased for the three and six month
periods ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same
periods in the prior year, as a result of our current year
adoption of the business combinations guidance in ASC 805.
Under the previous accounting guidance, restructuring costs
related to acquired companies were generally recorded through
purchase accounting, while the guidance in ASC 805
generally requires that these costs be recorded to the acquiring
companys statement of operations post-acquisition.
The following table sets forth the activity relating to the
restructuring accruals for the six months ended March 31,
2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expense), Net
The following table shows other income (expense), net in dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(80.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(76.0
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
(26.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
900.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
The change in other income (expense), net for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in
fiscal 2009, was primarily driven by gains on non-hedge
derivative instruments of $2.6 million. Interest income and
expense were lower during the three months ended March 31,
2010 due to lower prevailing market interest rates related to
our marketable investments and our variable-interest rate
borrowings.
The change in other income (expense), net for the six months
ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in
fiscal 2009, was primarily driven by gains on non-hedged
derivative instruments of $4.8 million during the six
months ended March 31, 2010, offset by the change in gain
recognized on foreign currency forward contracts to manage our
exposure on our Euro-denominated deferred acquisition payment
obligation of 44.3 million related to our acquisition
of PSRS which was paid on October 22, 2009. These foreign
currency contracts were not designated as hedges and changes in
fair value of these contracts were reported in net earnings as
other income. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, we
recorded a net $8.0 million gain as other income related to
these contracts and the related Euro-denominated obligation.
Interest income and expense were lower during the six months
ended March 31, 2010 due to lower prevailing market
interest rates related to our marketable investments and our
variable-interest rate borrowings.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table shows the provision for income taxes and the
effective income tax rate (in thousands of dollars, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
330.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
(75.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(101.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our effective income tax rate was (17.5)% and (23.3)% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The change in the effective tax rate primarily relates to the
effect of current period foreign withholding taxes offset by
discrete tax benefits resulting from certain international
research and development tax credits during the three months
ended March 31, 2010. No tax benefit has been recognized for the
U.S. losses, as the realization of such tax benefit is not
more likely than not.
Our effective income tax rate was (15.4)% and (101.8)% for the
six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
change in the effective tax rate primarily relates to an
$8.0 million tax provision charge resulting from an asset
purchase election made in 2009 in connection with the eScription
acquisition. No tax benefit has been recognized for the
U.S. losses, as the realization of such tax benefit is not
more likely than not.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $461.8 million as of
March 31, 2010, a decrease of $65.2 million as
compared to $527.0 million as of September 30, 2009.
Our working capital was $355.2 million as of March 31,
2010 as compared to $376.6 million as of September 30,
2009. As of March 31, 2010, our total accumulated deficit
was $281.9 million. We do not expect our accumulated
deficit to impact our future ability to operate the business
given our strong cash and operating cash flow positions, and
believe our current cash and cash equivalents on-hand are
sufficient to meet our operating needs for at least the next
twelve months.
Cash
Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 was $120.6 million, a decrease of
$10.0 million, or 8%, as compared to cash provided by
operating activities of $130.6 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $42.3 million from accounts
receivable primarily attributable to a growing accounts
receivable balance in the first six months of fiscal 2010 as
compared to a declining receivables balance in the same period
last year;
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash resulting from a decrease in net loss,
exclusive of non-cash adjustment items, of approximately
$37.3 million;
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash from accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$35.3 million primarily attributable to the timing of cash
payments under our normal operating cycles; and
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $24.3 million from deferred revenue
primarily attributable to billings of our eCopy imaging
solutions.
|
Cash Used
in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 was $189.5 million, an increase of
$52.1 million, or 38%, as compared to cash used in
investing activities of $137.4 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2009. The net increase was primarily driven
by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash payments related to acquisitions of
$97.6 million, primarily driven by the cash paid in the
acquisition of SpinVox, the PSRS deferred acquisition payment,
and the Phonetic earn-out payment;
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $55.5 million in cash payments for the
acquisition of speech-related patents and technology;
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash payments for equity investments of
$14.8 million primarily related to a cost method investment
in a non-public company made during the first quarter of
2010; and
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.8 million in capital expenditures.
|
Cash Used
in Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended
March 31, 2010 was $3.9 million, a decrease of
$164.8 million, or 98%, as compared to cash provided by
financing activities of $168.7 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2009. The net decrease was primarily driven
by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A $175.1 million decrease in cash proceeds from the sale of
our common stock. During the six months ended March 31,
2009, we sold 17.4 million shares of our common stock and
warrants to purchase 3.9 million shares of our common stock
for net proceeds of $175.1 million; and
|
|
|
|
An $11.8 million increase in cash proceeds from the
exercise of company stock options and participation in our
employee stock ownership plan.
|
2.75% Convertible
Debentures
On August 13, 2007, we issued $250 million of 2.75%
convertible senior debentures due in August 2027. As of
March 31, 2010, no conversion triggers were met. If the
conversion triggers were met, we could be required to repay all
or some of the principal amount in cash prior to maturity.
Credit
Facility
As of March 31, 2010, $646.9 million remained
outstanding under our term loan. There were $16.1 million
of letters of credit issued under the revolving credit line and
there were no other outstanding borrowings under the revolving
credit line. As of March 31, 2010, we are in compliance
with the covenants under the Credit Facility.
As of March 31, 2010, based on our leverage ratio, the
applicable margin for our term loan was 1.00% for base rate
borrowings and 2.00% for LIBOR-based borrowings. This results in
an effective interest rate of 2.23%. No payments under the
excess cash flow sweep provision were due in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 as no excess cash flow, as defined, was generated
in fiscal 2009. At the current time, we are unable to predict
the amount of the outstanding principal, if any, that we may be
required to repay in future fiscal years pursuant to the excess
cash flow
39
sweep provisions. If only the minimum required repayments are
made, the annual aggregate principal amount of the term loans
repaid would be as follows (table in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010 (April 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
2013 (maturity)
|
|
|
630,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
646,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
In March 2010, we issued 607,903 and 145,897 shares of our
common stock in payment to a third party, valued at
$10.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The
$10.0 million payment was for the purchase of the source
and object code software license, while the $2.4 million
payment was in respect of the amendment of the third-party
collaboration agreement discussed in Note 6 and Note 2
to the unaudited consolidated financial statements, respectively.
In February 2010, we issued 1.1 million shares of our
common stock, valued at $18.0 million, as partial
consideration for our second quarter fiscal 2010 acquisitions
discussed in Note 4 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
In October and December 2009, we issued 1,047,120 and
879,567 shares of our common stock in payment to a third
party, valued at $16.0 million and $13.0 million,
respectively. The $16.0 million payment was our first
payment in consideration for the research and development
services of the third party in connection with the third-party
collaboration arrangement discussed in Note 2 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements, while the
$13.0 million payment was final payment in respect of the
joint marketing and selling agreement with the same third party
discussed in Note 6 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2009, we issued 2.3 million shares of our
common stock, valued at $36.4 million, as partial
consideration for the acquisition of SpinVox Limited discussed
in Note 4 to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
On March 19, 2004, we announced that Warburg Pincus had
agreed to purchase all outstanding shares of and warrants for
our common stock held by Xerox Corporation for approximately
$80.0 million. In connection with this transaction, Warburg
Pincus acquired new warrants to purchase 2.5 million
additional shares of our common stock for total consideration of
$0.6 million. The warrants had a six-year life and an
exercise price of $4.94 per share. In April 2010, all
2.5 million of these common stock warrants were exercised,
with total cash proceeds to the Company of $12.4 million.
We believe cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash flows from
future operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital
and contractual obligations as they become due for the
foreseeable future. We also believe that in the event future
operating results are not as planned, that we could take
actions, including restructuring actions and other cost
reduction initiatives, to reduce operating expenses to levels
which, in combination with expected future revenue, will
continue to generate sufficient operating cash flow. In the
event that these actions are not effective in generating
operating cash flows, we may be required to issue equity or debt
securities on terms that may be less than favorable.
40
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual
obligations as of March 31, 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
and 2013
|
|
|
and 2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(1)
|
|
$
|
250.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
250.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
646.9
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
636.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Credit Facility(2)
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures(3)
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
115.6
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
Other lease obligations associated with the closing of duplicate
facilities related to restructurings and acquisitions
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, minimum funding requirement
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration agreement(4)
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities assumed(5)
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
1,215.6
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
83.7
|
|
|
$
|
761.0
|
|
|
$
|
288.3
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holders of 2.75% Convertible Senior Debentures can require
us to repurchase the debentures on August 15, 2014, 2017
and 2022. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest is due and payable monthly, and principal is paid on a
quarterly basis. The amounts included as interest payable in
this table are based on the effective interest rate as of
March 31, 2010 excluding the effect of our interest rate
swaps. |
|
(3) |
|
These figures represent coupon interest only, payable by us in
cash, semi-annually. |
|
(4) |
|
Payments under the collaboration agreement are payable in cash
or our common stock at our option. Refer to Note 2 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements for further
information. |
|
(5) |
|
Obligations include assumed long-term liabilities related to
restructuring programs initiated by the predecessor entities
prior to our acquisition of SpeechWorks International, Inc. in
August 2003, and our acquisition of the former Nuance
Communications, Inc. in September 2005. These restructuring
programs relate to the closing of two facilities with lease
terms set to expire in 2016 and 2012. Total contractual
obligations under these two leases are $41.0 million. As of
March 31, 2010, we have
sub-leased a
portion of the office space related to these two facilities to
unrelated third parties. Total sublease income under the
remaining contractual terms is expected to be
$15.6 million, which ranges from $1.5 million to
$4.1 million on an annualized basis through 2016. |
Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments
In connection with our acquisition of SNAPin Software, Inc.
(SNAPin) we agreed to make a contingent earn-out
payment of up to $45.0 million in cash to be paid, if at
all, based on the business achieving certain performance targets
that are measurable from the acquisition date to
December 31, 2009. Additionally, we would be required to
issue earn-out consideration to SNAPin option holders. Option
earn-out consideration, if earned, is payable at our sole
discretion, in cash, stock or additional options to purchase
common stock. The total value of this option earn-out
consideration may aggregate up to $2.5 million, and will be
recorded as compensation expense over the service
41
period, if earned. In April 2010, the Company and the former
shareholders of SNAPin agreed on a $21.2 million final
value of the earn-out value of $21.2 million. On
April 30, 2010, we issued 565,069 shares of our common
stock, valued at $10.6 million, as our first payment under
the earn-out agreement. The remaining $10.6 million is
payable in cash, or stock, solely at our option, on or before
October 1, 2011.
In connection with our acquisition of Multi-Vision
Communications, Inc. (Multi-Vision), we agreed to
make contingent earn-out payments of up to $15.0 million,
payable in stock, or cash, solely at our discretion, relating to
earn-out provisions described in the share purchase agreement.
Two-thirds of the earn-out is conditioned on performance targets
and continued employment; accordingly, up to $10.0 million
of any earn-out payments that become payable will be recorded as
compensation expense, and up to $5.0 million, the portion
of the prospective earn-out attributable solely to performance
targets, will be recorded as additional purchase price and
allocated to goodwill. We have notified the former shareholders
of Multi-Vision that the performance targets were not achieved.
Therefore, through March 31, 2010, we have not recorded any
obligation or related compensation expense relative to these
measures.
In connection with our acquisition of Vocada, Inc.
(Vocada), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $21.0 million upon the achievement of
certain financial targets measured over defined periods through
December 31, 2010. Payments, if any, may be made in the
form of cash or shares of our common stock, at our sole
discretion. We have notified the former shareholders of Vocada
that the financial targets for certain periods were not
achieved. The former shareholders of Vocada have requested
additional information regarding this determination. We are
currently in discussions with the former shareholders of Vocada
regarding this matter. Through March 31, 2010, we have not
recorded any obligation relative to these matters.
In connection with the acquisition of Commissure, Inc.
(Commissure), we agreed to make contingent earn-out
payments of up to $8.0 million upon the achievement of
certain financial targets for the fiscal years 2008, 2009 and
2010. Payments, if any, may be made in the form of cash or
shares of our common stock, solely at our discretion. We have
notified the former shareholders of Commissure that the
financial targets for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008 were not achieved and the related contingent earn-out
payment was not earned. We are continuing to evaluate the
financial targets related to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. Through March 31, 2010, we have
not recorded any obligation relative to the Commissure
transaction earn-out provisions.
Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We use financial instruments to manage our interest rate and
foreign exchange risk. Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 815 (ASC 815), for certain
designated forward contracts and interest rate swaps.
To manage the interest rate exposure on our variable-rate
borrowings, we use interest rate swaps to convert specific
variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt. As of March 31,
2010, we have two outstanding interest rate swaps designated as
cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amount of
$200 million. The interest rates on these swaps are 2.7%
and 2.1%, plus the applicable margin for the Credit Facility,
and they expire in October 2010 and November 2010, respectively.
As of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the
aggregate cumulative unrealized losses related to these swaps
were $2.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively and
were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
in the accompanying balance sheets.
On October 1, 2009, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Canadian dollars with a total notional amount of
CAD$8.7 million. These contracts are designated as cash
flow hedges. At March 31, 2010, these contracts had an
aggregate remaining, unsettled notional amount of
CAD$2.1 million. The contracts settle each month from
April 13, 2010 through July 13, 2010. As of
March 31, 2010, the aggregate cumulative unrealized gains
related to these contracts were $0.1 million and were
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the
accompanying balance sheets.
On February 4, 2010, we entered into foreign currency
contracts to hedge exposure on the variability of cash flows in
Hungarian Forints (HUF) with a total notional amount
of HUF 688.0 million. These contracts are designated as
cash flow hedges. At March 31, 2010, these contracts had an
aggregate remaining, unsettled notional
42
amount of HUF 479.0 million. The contracts settle each
month from April 19, 2010 through October 18, 2010. As
of March 31, 2010, the aggregate cumulative unrealized
gains related to these contracts were immaterial.
As of March 31, 2010, we have outstanding security price
guarantees relative to a total of 2,680,487 shares of our
common stock issued to a third party as discussed in Note 7
to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Changes in
fair value of these security price guarantees are reported in
earnings each period as non-operating income (expense) within
other income (expense), net. For the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010, increases in fair value of $2.6 and
$4.7 million, respectively, related to the settled and
unsettled security price guarantees are reported in earnings as
non-operating income within other income (expense), net.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Through March 31, 2010, we have not entered into any
off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with
unconsolidated entities or other persons.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially from that
disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a
system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) designed to ensure that information we are required
to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
issuers management, including its principal executive
officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision
of, and with the participation of, management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to meet the requirements of
Rule 13a-15
under the Exchange Act.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes to our internal controls over financial
reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required
by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15
that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II.
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
This information is included in Note 18, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference
from Item 1 of Part I.
43
You should carefully consider the risks described below when
evaluating our company and when deciding whether to invest in
our company. The risks and uncertainties described below are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are
important to an investor may also harm our business operations.
If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions
described in the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or our results of operations could be
seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the
value of any of our shares held by you.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly from period to
period, and this may cause our stock price to
decline.
Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past
and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given
this fluctuation, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of revenue and operating results are not necessarily meaningful
or an accurate indicator of our future performance. As a result,
our results of operations may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors in the future. If this occurs,
the price of our stock would likely decline. Factors that
contribute to fluctuations in operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
slowing sales by our distribution and fulfillment partners to
their customers, which may place pressure on these partners to
reduce purchases of our products;
|
|
|
|
volume, timing and fulfillment of customer orders;
|
|
|
|
our efforts to generate additional revenue from our intellectual
property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
concentration of operations with one manufacturing partner and
our inability to control expenses related to the manufacturing,
packaging and shipping of our boxed software products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying their purchasing decisions in anticipation of
new versions of our products;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying, canceling or limiting their purchases as a
result of the threat or results of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
seasonality in purchasing patterns of our customers;
|
|
|
|
reduction in the prices of our products in response to
competition, market conditions or contractual obligations;
|
|
|
|
returns and allowance charges in excess of accrued amounts;
|
|
|
|
timing of significant marketing and sales promotions;
|
|
|
|
impairment charges against goodwill and intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
delayed realization of synergies resulting from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
write-offs of excess or obsolete inventory and accounts
receivable that are not collectible;
|
|
|
|
increased expenditures incurred pursuing new product or market
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
general economic trends as they affect retail and corporate
sales; and
|
|
|
|
higher than anticipated costs related to fixed-price contracts
with our customers.
|
Due to the foregoing factors, among others, our revenue and
operating results are difficult to forecast. Our expense levels
are based in significant part on our expectations of future
revenue and we may not be able to reduce our expenses quickly to
respond to a shortfall in projected revenue. Therefore, our
failure to meet revenue expectations would seriously harm our
operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
44
We
have grown, and may continue to grow, through acquisitions,
which could dilute our existing stockholders.
As part of our business strategy, we have in the past acquired,
and expect to continue to acquire, other businesses and
technologies. In connection with past acquisitions, we issued a
substantial number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration and also incurred significant debt to finance the
cash consideration used for our acquisitions. We may continue to
issue equity securities for future acquisitions, which would
dilute existing stockholders, perhaps significantly depending on
the terms of such acquisitions. We may also incur additional
debt in connection with future acquisitions, which, if available
at all, may place additional restrictions on our ability to
operate our business.
Our
ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions
will depend on successfully integrating the acquired
businesses.
Our prior acquisitions required, and our recently completed
acquisitions continue to require, substantial integration and
management efforts and we expect future acquisitions to require
similar efforts. Acquisitions of this nature involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in transitioning and integrating the operations and
personnel of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulty in successfully implementing, upgrading and
deploying in a timely and effective manner new operational
information systems and upgrades of our finance, accounting and
product distribution systems;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in incorporating acquired technology and rights into
our products and technology;
|
|
|
|
potential difficulties in completing projects associated with
in-process research and development;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated expenses and delays in completing acquired
development projects and technology integration;
|
|
|
|
management of geographically remote business units both in the
United States and internationally;
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with partners and customers;
|
|
|
|
assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies;
|
|
|
|
accurate projection of revenue plans of the acquired entity in
the due diligence process;
|
|
|
|
customers delaying purchases of our products pending resolution
of product integration between our existing and our newly
acquired products;
|
|
|
|
entering markets or types of businesses in which we have limited
experience; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of the acquired business.
|
As a result of these and other risks, if we are unable to
successfully integrate acquired businesses, we may not realize
the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. Any failure to
achieve these benefits or failure to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies could seriously harm our
business.
Accounting
treatment of our acquisitions could decrease our net income or
expected revenue in the foreseeable future, which could have a
material and adverse effect on the market value of our common
stock.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, we record the market value of our common
stock or other form of consideration issued in connection with
the acquisition and, for transactions which closed prior to
October 1, 2009, the amount of direct transaction costs as
the cost of acquiring the company or business. We have allocated
that cost to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including various identifiable intangible assets such
as acquired technology, acquired tradenames and acquired
customer relationships based on their respective fair values.
Intangible assets generally will be amortized over a five to ten
year period. Goodwill and certain intangible assets with
indefinite lives, are not subject to amortization but are
subject to
45
an impairment analysis, at least annually, which may result in
an impairment charge if the carrying value exceeds its implied
fair value. As of March 31, 2010, we had identified
intangible assets of approximately $706.2 million, net of
accumulated amortization, and goodwill of approximately
$2.0 billion. In addition, purchase accounting limits our
ability to recognize certain revenue that otherwise would have
been recognized by the acquired company as an independent
business. The combined company may delay revenue recognition or
recognize less revenue than we and the acquired company would
have recognized as independent companies.
Changes
in the accounting method for business combinations may have an
adverse impact on our reported or future financial
results.
For the years ended September 30, 2009 and prior, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) 141 Business Combinations,
(SFAS 141), all acquisition-related costs, such
as attorneys fees and accountants fees, as well as
contingent consideration to the seller, which was recorded when
it is beyond a reasonable doubt that the amount is payable, were
capitalized as part of the purchase price.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations,
(SFAS 141R), now referred to as FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 805 (ASC 805), which requires
an acquirer to do the following: expense acquisition-related
costs as incurred; reflect such payments as a reduction of cash
flow from operations; record contingent consideration at fair
value at the acquisition date with subsequent changes in fair
value to be recognized in the income statement and cash flow
from operations. ASC 805 applies to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1,
2009. ASC 805 could have a material impact on our results of
operations and our financial position due to our acquisition
strategy.
Our
significant debt could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our credit
facility and our convertible debentures.
We have a significant amount of debt. As of March 31, 2010,
we had a total of $899.2 million of gross debt outstanding,
including $646.9 million in term loans due in March 2013
and $250.0 million in convertible debentures which
investors may require us to redeem in August 2014. We also have
a $75.0 million revolving credit line available to us
through March 2012. As of March 31, 2010, there were
$16.1 million of letters of credit issued under the
revolving credit line but there were no other outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit line. Our debt level could
have important consequences, for example it could:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to use a large portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on debt, including the convertible
debentures and the credit facility, which will reduce the
availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, research and development
expenditures and other business activities;
|
|
|
|
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting
business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in our debt, our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of
assets or pay cash dividends.
|
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our
debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to
general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and
regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our
control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate
cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be
available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet
our payment obligations under the convertible debentures and our
other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able
to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt,
including the convertible debentures, sell assets, reduce or
delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives,
we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the
convertible debentures and our other debt.
46
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, our debt
service requirements will increase, which would adversely affect
our cash flows. While we have entered into interest rate swap
agreements limiting our exposure for a portion of our debt, the
agreements do not offer complete protection from this risk.
Our
debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our
ability to operate our business.
The agreement governing our senior credit facility contains, and
any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant
restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business,
including restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt or issue guarantees;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
sell certain assets;
|
|
|
|
redeem capital stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
|
declare or pay dividends or make other distributions to
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any entity.
|
Our ability to comply with these covenants is dependent on our
future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control, including prevailing economic
conditions. As a result of these covenants, our ability to
respond to changes in business and economic conditions and to
obtain additional financing, if needed, may be significantly
restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in
transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. In
addition, our failure to comply with these covenants could
result in a default under our debt agreements, which could
permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the
debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have
sufficient funds available to repay the accelerated debt.
We
have a history of operating losses, and may incur losses in the
future, which may require us to raise additional capital on
unfavorable terms.
We reported net losses of $19.7 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2010 and $21.0 million for the six
months ended March 31, 2009. If we are unable to achieve
and maintain profitability, the market price for our stock may
decline, perhaps substantially. We cannot assure you that our
revenue will grow or that we will achieve or maintain
profitability in the future. If we do not achieve and maintain
profitability, we may be required to raise additional capital to
maintain or grow our operations. The terms of any transaction to
raise additional capital, if available at all, may be highly
dilutive to existing investors or contain other unfavorable
terms, such as a high interest rate and restrictive covenants.
Speech
technologies may not achieve widespread acceptance, which could
limit our ability to grow our speech business.
We have invested and expect to continue to invest heavily in the
acquisition, development and marketing of speech technologies.
The market for speech technologies is relatively new and rapidly
evolving. Our ability to increase revenue in the future depends
in large measure on the acceptance of speech technologies in
general and our products in particular. The continued
development of the market for our current and future speech
solutions will also depend on:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer and business demand for speech-enabled applications;
|
|
|
|
development by third-party vendors of applications using speech
technologies; and
|
|
|
|
continuous improvement in speech technology.
|
47
Sales of our speech products would be harmed if the market for
speech technologies does not continue to develop or develops
slower than we expect, and, consequently, our business could be
harmed and we may not recover the costs associated with our
investment in our speech technologies.
The
markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly
changing and we may be unable to compete
successfully.
There are a number of companies that develop or may develop
products that compete in our targeted markets. The individual
markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and are
rapidly changing. Within speech, we compete with AT&T,
Microsoft, Google, and other smaller providers. Within
healthcare dictation and transcription, we compete with Spheris,
Medquist and other smaller providers. Within imaging, we compete
directly with ABBYY, Adobe, I.R.I.S. and NewSoft. In speech,
some of our partners such as Avaya, Cisco, Edify, Genesys and
Nortel develop and market products that can be considered
substitutes for our solutions. In addition, a number of smaller
companies in both speech and imaging produce technologies or
products that are in some markets competitive with our
solutions. Current and potential competitors have established,
or may establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or
with third parties to increase the ability of their technologies
to address the needs of our prospective customers.
The competition in these markets could adversely affect our
operating results by reducing the volume of the products we
license or the prices we can charge. Some of our current or
potential competitors, such as Adobe, Microsoft and Google, have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. These competitors may be able to respond
more rapidly than we can to new or emerging technologies or
changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we do.
Some of our customers, such as IBM, Microsoft and Google, have
developed or acquired products or technologies that compete with
our products and technologies. These customers may give higher
priority to the sale of these competitive products or
technologies. To the extent they do so, market acceptance and
penetration of our products, and therefore our revenue, may be
adversely affected. Our success will depend substantially upon
our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new
products and features that meet changing customer requirements
and incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to
develop new products and enhance functionalities or technologies
to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize
synergies among our acquired products and technologies, our
business will suffer.
The
failure to successfully maintain the adequacy of our system of
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse impact on our ability to report our financial results in
an accurate and timely manner.
The SEC, as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring public companies to include
a report of management on internal control over financial
reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K
that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to
and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. Any failure in the effectiveness of our
system of internal control over financial reporting could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to report our financial
statements in an accurate and timely manner, could subject us to
regulatory actions, civil or criminal penalties, shareholder
litigation, or loss of customer confidence, which could result
in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a
loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements, which ultimately could negatively impact our stock
price.
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived, and a significant
portion of our research and development activities are based,
outside the United States. Our results could be harmed by
economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with
these international regions.
Because we operate worldwide, our business is subject to risks
associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate
that revenue from international operations could increase in the
future. Most of our international
48
revenue is generated by sales in Europe and Asia. In addition,
some of our products are developed and manufactured outside the
United States and we have a large number of employees in India
that provide transcription services. A significant portion of
the development and manufacturing of our speech products are
conducted in Belgium and Canada, and a significant portion of
our imaging research and development is conducted in Hungary. We
also have significant research and development resources in
Aachen, Germany, and Vienna, Austria. Accordingly, our future
results could be harmed by a variety of factors associated with
international sales and operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions economic
conditions;
|
|
|
|
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements imposed by the United States or by other countries;
|
|
|
|
compliance with foreign and domestic laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
negative consequences from changes in applicable tax laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing operations in multiple
locations in many countries;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting trade accounts receivable in other
countries; and
|
|
|
|
less effective protection of intellectual property than in the
United States.
|
We are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Because we have international subsidiaries and distributors that
operate and sell our products outside the United States, we are
exposed to the risk of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates or declining economic conditions in these countries. In
certain circumstances, we have entered into forward exchange
contracts to hedge against foreign currency fluctuations. We use
these contracts to reduce our risk associated with exchange rate
movements, as the gains or losses on these contracts are
intended to offset any exchange rate losses or gains on the
hedged transaction. We do not engage in foreign currency
speculation. Forward exchange contracts hedging firm commitments
qualify for hedge accounting when they are designated as a hedge
of the foreign currency exposure and they are effective in
minimizing such exposure. With our increased international
presence in a number of geographic locations and with
international revenue and costs projected to increase, we are
exposed to changes in foreign currencies including the Euro,
British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen, Indian Rupee and
the Hungarian Forint. Changes in the value of the Euro or other
foreign currencies relative to the value of the U.S. dollar
could adversely affect future revenue and operating results.
Impairment
of our intangible assets could result in significant charges
that would adversely impact our future operating
results.
We have significant intangible assets, including goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives, which are susceptible to
valuation adjustments as a result of changes in various factors
or conditions. The most significant intangible assets are
patents and core technology, completed technology, customer
relationships and trademarks. Customer relationships are
amortized on an accelerated basis based upon the pattern in
which the economic benefits of customer relationships are being
utilized. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We
assess the potential impairment of identifiable intangible
assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment of such
assets, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business;
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends;
|
|
|
|
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period;
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization or management reporting structure
could result in additional reporting units, which may require
alternative methods of estimating fair values or greater
disaggregation or aggregation in our analysis by reporting
unit; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in our market capitalization below net book value.
|
Future adverse changes in these or other unforeseeable factors
could result in an impairment charge that would impact our
results of operations and financial position in the reporting
period identified.
Our
sales to government clients subject us to risks, including early
termination, audits, investigations, sanctions and
penalties.
We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with the
United States government, as well as various state and local
governments, and their respective agencies. Government contracts
are generally subject to audits and investigations which could
identify violations of these agreements. Government contract
violations could result in a range of consequences including,
but not limited to, contract price adjustments, civil and
criminal penalties, contract termination, forfeiture of profit
and/or
suspension of payment, and suspension or debarment from future
government contracts. We could also suffer serious harm to our
reputation if we were found to have violated the terms of our
government contracts.
We recently conducted an analysis of our compliance with the
terms and conditions of certain contracts with the
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA).
Based upon our analysis, we voluntarily notified GSA of
non-compliance with the terms of two contracts. The final
resolution of this matter may adversely impact our financial
position.
If we
are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business
could be harmed.
If any of our key employees were to leave, we could face
substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could
experience a loss in productivity while any successor obtains
the necessary training and experience. Our employment
relationships are generally at-will and we have had key
employees leave in the past. We cannot assure you that one or
more key employees will not leave in the future. We intend to
continue to hire additional highly qualified personnel,
including software engineers and operational personnel, but may
not be able to attract, assimilate or retain qualified personnel
in the future. Any failure to attract, integrate, motivate and
retain these employees could harm our business.
Our
medical transcription services may be subject to legal claims
for failure to comply with laws governing the confidentiality of
medical records.
Healthcare professionals who use our medical transcription
services deliver to us health information about their patients
including information that constitutes a record under applicable
law that we may store on our computer systems. Numerous federal
and state laws and regulations, the common law and contractual
obligations govern collection, dissemination, use and
confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
state and federal privacy and confidentiality laws;
|
|
|
|
our contracts with customers and partners;
|
|
|
|
state laws regulating healthcare professionals;
|
|
|
|
Medicaid laws; and
|
|
|
|
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
and related rules proposed by the Health Care Financing
Administration.
|
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
establishes elements including, but not limited to, federal
privacy and security standards for the use and protection of
protected health information. Any failure by us or by our
personnel or partners to comply with applicable requirements may
result in a material liability. Although we have systems and
policies in place for safeguarding protected health information
from unauthorized disclosure, these systems and policies may not
preclude claims against us for alleged violations of
50
applicable requirements. There can be no assurance that we will
not be subject to liability claims that could have a material
adverse affect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Adverse
changes in general economic or political conditions in any of
the major countries in which we do business could adversely
affect our operating results.
As our business has grown, we have become increasingly subject
to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global
economic and political conditions. For example, the direction
and relative strength of the U.S. and global economies have
recently been increasingly uncertain due to softness in housing
markets, extreme volatility in security prices, severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades
of certain investments and declining valuations of others and
continuing geopolitical uncertainties. If economic growth in the
United States and other countries in which we do business is
slowed, customers may delay or reduce technology purchases and
may be unable to obtain credit to finance the purchase of our
products. This could result in reduced sales of our products,
longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. Any of these events would likely
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Political instability in any of the major countries
in which we do business would also likely harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Current
uncertainty in the global financial markets and the global
economy may negatively affect our financial
results.
Current uncertainty in the global financial markets and economy
may negatively affect our financial results. These macroeconomic
developments could negatively affect our business, operating
results or financial condition in a number of ways which, in
turn, could adversely affect our stock price. A prolonged period
of economic decline could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition and exacerbate
some of the other risk factors described herein. Our customers
may defer purchases of our products, licenses, and services in
response to tighter credit and negative financial news or reduce
their demand for them. Our customers may also not be able to
obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their
ability to make timely payments to us or ultimately cause the
customer to file for protection from creditors under applicable
insolvency or bankruptcy laws. If our customers are not able to
make timely payments to us, our accounts receivable could
increase.
Our investment portfolio, which includes short-term debt
securities, is generally subject to credit, liquidity,
counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be
exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis. If the
banking system or the fixed income, credit or equity markets
deteriorate or remain volatile, our investment portfolio may be
impacted and the values and liquidity of our investments could
be adversely affected.
In addition, our operating results and financial condition could
be negatively affected if, as a result of economic conditions,
either:
|
|
|
|
|
the demand for, and prices of, our products, licenses, or
services are reduced as a result of actions by our competitors
or otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
our financial counterparties or other contractual counterparties
are unable to, or do not, meet their contractual commitments to
us.
|
Security
and privacy breaches in our systems may damage client relations
and inhibit our growth.
The uninterrupted operation of our hosted solutions and the
confidentiality and security of third-party information is
critical to our business. Any failures in our security and
privacy measures could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. If we are unable
to protect, or our clients perceive that we are unable to
protect, the security and privacy of our electronic information,
our growth could be materially adversely affected. A security or
privacy breach may:
|
|
|
|
|
cause our clients to lose confidence in our solutions;
|
|
|
|
harm our reputation;
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
expose us to liability; and
|
|
|
|
increase our expenses from potential remediation costs.
|
While we believe we use proven applications designed for data
security and integrity to process electronic transactions, there
can be no assurance that our use of these applications will be
sufficient to address changing market conditions or the security
and privacy concerns of existing and potential clients.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property and Technology
Unauthorized
use of our proprietary technology and intellectual property
could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Our success and competitive position depend in large part on our
ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights
protecting our products and services. We rely on a combination
of patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade
secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements
to establish and protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our products or to obtain, license, sell or otherwise
use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing
unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we may not be
able to protect our technology from unauthorized use.
Additionally, our competitors may independently develop
technologies that are substantially the same or superior to our
technologies and that do not infringe our rights. In these
cases, we would be unable to prevent our competitors from
selling or licensing these similar or superior technologies. In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Although the source code for our proprietary software is
protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property
rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity
and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend
against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation,
regardless of the outcome, can be very expensive and can divert
management efforts.
Third
parties have claimed and may claim in the future that we are
infringing their intellectual property, and we could be exposed
to significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented
from selling our products if such claims are
successful.
From time to time, we are subject to claims that we or our
customers may be infringing or contributing to the infringement
of the intellectual property rights of others. We may be unaware
of intellectual property rights of others that may cover some of
our technologies and products. If it appears necessary or
desirable, we may seek licenses for these intellectual property
rights. However, we may not be able to obtain licenses from some
or all claimants, the terms of any offered licenses may not be
acceptable to us, and we may not be able to resolve disputes
without litigation. Any litigation regarding intellectual
property could be costly and time-consuming and could divert the
attention of our management and key personnel from our business
operations. In the event of a claim of intellectual property
infringement, we may be required to enter into costly royalty or
license agreements. Third parties claiming intellectual property
infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable
relief that could effectively block our ability to develop and
sell our products.
We may
incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual
property rights and defending against third-party claims as a
result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual
property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights, or disputes relating to the validity or alleged
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights,
including patent rights, we have been, are currently, and may in
the future be, subject to claims, negotiations or complex,
protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and
litigation are typically very costly and can be disruptive to
our business operations by diverting the attention and energy of
management and key technical personnel. Although we have
successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes,
we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and
disputes. In addition, we may incur significant costs in
acquiring the necessary third party intellectual property rights
for use in our products. Third party intellectual property
disputes could subject us to significant liabilities, require us
to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable
terms, prevent us from manufacturing or licensing certain of our
products, cause severe disruptions to our operations
52
or the markets in which we compete, or require us to satisfy
indemnification commitments with our customers including
contractual provisions under various license arrangements. Any
of these could seriously harm our business.
Our
software products may have bugs, which could result in delayed
or lost revenue, expensive correction, liability to our
customers and claims against us.
Complex software products such as ours may contain errors,
defects or bugs. Defects in the solutions or products that we
develop and sell to our customers could require expensive
corrections and result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse
customer reaction and negative publicity about us or our
products and services. Customers who are not satisfied with any
of our products may also bring claims against us for damages,
which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming to
defend, and could result in costly litigation and payment of
damages. Such claims could harm our reputation, financial
results and competitive position.
Risks
Related to our Corporate Structure, Organization and Common
Stock
The
holdings of our largest stockholder may enable it to influence
matters requiring stockholder approval.
As of March 31, 2010, Warburg Pincus beneficially owned
approximately 24% of our outstanding common stock, including
warrants exercisable for up to 10,062,422 shares of our
common stock, and 3,562,238 shares of our outstanding
Series B Preferred Stock, each of which is convertible into
one share of our common stock. Because of its large holdings of
our capital stock relative to other stockholders, this
stockholder has a strong influence over matters requiring
approval by our stockholders.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be
subject to wide fluctuations, and this may make it difficult for
you to resell the common stock when you want or at prices you
find attractive.
Our stock price historically has been, and may continue to be,
volatile. Various factors contribute to the volatility of the
stock price, including, for example, quarterly variations in our
financial results, new product introductions by us or our
competitors and general economic and market conditions. Sales of
a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our
largest stockholder, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could also contribute to the volatility or our stock
price. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these
factors may have on the market price of our common stock, these
factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant volatility in our stock price during any given
period of time. Moreover, companies that have experienced
volatility in the market price of their stock often are subject
to securities class action litigation. If we were the subject of
such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and divert
managements attention and resources.
Compliance
with changing regulation of corporate governance and public
disclosure may result in additional expenses.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, new regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select
Market, are resulting in increased general and administrative
expenses for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations
in many cases, and as a result, their application in practice
may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory
and governing bodies, which could result in higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of
corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we
intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws,
regulations and standards, and this investment may result in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the
activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies, our
business may be harmed.
53
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market could adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to
raise funds in new stock offerings.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. In
connection with past acquisitions, we issued a substantial
number of shares of our common stock as transaction
consideration. We may continue to issue equity securities for
future acquisitions, which would dilute existing stockholders,
perhaps significantly depending on the terms of such
acquisitions. For example, we issued, and registered for resale,
approximately 2.3 million shares of our common stock in
connection with our December 2009 acquisition of SpinVox. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future
sales of shares of common stock, or the availability of shares
of common stock for future sale, will have on the trading price
of our common stock.
We
have implemented anti-takeover provisions, which could
discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would
be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and
Delaware law, as well as other organizational documents could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if
doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
authorized blank check preferred stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
limiting the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at meetings of our
stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
directors and for stockholder proposals.
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
On February 12, 2010, we issued 406,780 shares of our
common stock to the shareholders of MacSpeech, Inc. as partial
consideration for our acquisition of MacSpeech, Inc. The shares
were issued in reliance upon an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided
by Section 4(2) thereof because the issuance did not
involve a public offering.
On February 17, 2010 and February 25, 2010, we issued
a total of 812,911 shares of our common stock to the
shareholders of Language and Computing, Inc. as partial
consideration for our acquisition of Language and Computing,
Inc. The shares were issued in reliance upon an exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, provided by Section 4(2) thereof because the
issuance did not involve a public offering.
On March 31, 2010, we issued 145,897 shares of our
common stock to International Business Machines Corporation
(IBM) as consideration for an amendment to our
collaboration agreement to extend certain provisions for an
additional eighteen months. The shares were issued in reliance
upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by
Section 4(2) thereof because the issuance did not involve a
public offering.
On March 31, 2010, we issued 607,903 shares of our
common stock to IBM as consideration for a royalty-free,
paid-up
perpetual source and object code license. The shares were issued
in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by
Section 4(2) thereof because the issuance did not involve a
public offering.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
54
|
|
Item 4.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are filed or
incorporated by reference (as stated therein) as part of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the Town of Burlington, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, on May 10, 2010.
Nuance Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
L. Beaudoin
|
Thomas L. Beaudoin
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
56
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
5/11/2001
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
8/9/2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
10/19/2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Registrant.
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-142182
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
4/18/2007
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-27038
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
3/15/2004
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
57