Retail Ventures 10-Q/A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q/A
(Amendment
No. 2)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 29, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-10767
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
20-0090238 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
|
|
|
3241 Westerville Road, Columbus, Ohio
|
|
43224 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(614) 471-4722
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of outstanding common shares, without par value, as of November 30, 2005 was 39,539,776.
RETAIL
VENTURES, INC. FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 2
INTRODUCTORY
NOTE
On
July 31, 2006, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
approved managements recommendation that the Companys
financial statements and related disclosures for the three and nine
months ended October 29, 2005 be restated in response to
comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
primarily related to the fair value of the warrants.
This filing is made to restate the Companys October 29, 2005 and the thirteen week period
then ended condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. This filing
corrects errors, by eliminating the application of a block sale discount, identified in the calculation of the warrant liability and the related change in
fair value of warrants recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements. This filing also amends various disclosures including disclosures in
managements discussion and analysis and selected financial data.
As of
October 29, 2005 the correction of the above-noted error increased the Warrant liability by $48.3 million, reduced
Retained earnings by $39.5 million, and reduced Common shares by
$8.8 million. The correction of the error for the three months
ended October 29, 2005 increased by $2.2 million all
of the following (i) Change in fair value of warrants
(ii) Operating profit (iii) Income before
income taxes (iv) Income before minority interest and
(v) Net income. The correction of the error for the nine months
ended October 29, 2005 increased by $39.5 million all of the
following (i) Change in fair value of warrants
(ii) Operating loss (iii) Loss before income taxes
(iv) Loss before minority interest and (v) Net loss. The basic
and diluted earnings per share increased to $1.43 and $0.92, respectively for the three months
ended October 29, 2005 and basic and diluted loss per share
increased to $2.94 for the nine
months ended October 29, 2005.
This adjustment had no effect on the previously reported balance sheet as of January 29, 2005 or
the condensed consolidated financial statements for any period prior to the quarter ended July 30,
2005 which has also been amended separately. This adjustment had no effect on net cash or the
income tax returns filed by the Company. This correction is further detailed in Note 15 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
This amendment does not reflect events after the filing of the original report on Form 10-Q filed
December 8, 2005 with the SEC, and is not intended to update other information presented except as
required to reflect the effects of this restatement. Except for Items 1, 2 and 4 of Part I and Item
6 of Part II, no other information included in the Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) filed on April 11,
2006 is amended by this Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 2).
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
Part I.Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
-2-
Part I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
January 29, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restated* |
|
|
|
Restated* |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
78,778 |
|
|
$ |
29,258 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
47,826 |
|
|
|
7,455 |
|
Receivables from related parties |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
617,903 |
|
|
|
473,051 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
28,830 |
|
|
|
21,112 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
56,284 |
|
|
|
62,355 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
830,148 |
|
|
|
593,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
276,841 |
|
|
|
280,454 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
Tradenames and other intangibles, net |
|
|
40,278 |
|
|
|
43,460 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets |
|
|
8,887 |
|
|
|
32,881 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,182,053 |
|
|
$ |
976,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
268,152 |
|
|
$ |
202,578 |
|
Accounts payable to related parties |
|
|
4,529 |
|
|
|
5,428 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
187,461 |
|
|
|
151,547 |
|
Warrant
liability ($95,769 related party) |
|
|
96,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
557,556 |
|
|
|
360,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties |
|
|
148,652 |
|
|
|
169,134 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
174,241 |
|
Deferred
income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
131,416 |
|
|
|
87,710 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
108,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, without par value;
160,000,000 authorized; issued,
39,536,927 and 34,110,707, respectively |
|
|
158,008 |
|
|
|
143,477 |
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,074 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
34,924 |
|
|
|
42,756 |
|
Deferred compensation expense, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Treasury shares, at cost, 7,551 shares |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,068 |
) |
|
|
(7,068 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
185,803 |
|
|
|
185,177 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,182,053 |
|
|
$ |
976,426 |
|
|
* See note
15
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-3-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Restated* |
|
|
Restated* |
|
|
Restated* |
|
|
Restated* |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
746,101 |
|
|
$ |
699,738 |
|
|
$ |
2,092,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,977,692 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(462,397 |
) |
|
|
(419,776 |
) |
|
|
(1,281,412 |
) |
|
|
(1,178,731 |
) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
283,704 |
|
|
|
279,962 |
|
|
|
811,468 |
|
|
|
798,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
(290,439 |
) |
|
|
(273,962 |
) |
|
|
(835,328 |
) |
|
|
(778,232 |
) |
Change in fair value of warrants
($66,407 and $(71,147) related
party, respectively) |
|
|
66,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
License fees and other income |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
61,855 |
|
|
|
7,950 |
|
|
|
(87,342 |
) |
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties |
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
(3,123 |
) |
|
|
(10,430 |
) |
|
|
(8,981 |
) |
Related parties |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(6,815 |
) |
|
|
(12,884 |
) |
|
|
(20,266 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
58,610 |
|
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
|
|
(110,656 |
) |
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest |
|
|
60,422 |
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
(109,011 |
) |
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(4,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
56,400 |
|
|
$ |
(1,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(112,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
39,479 |
|
|
|
33,978 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
|
|
33,914 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
61,514 |
|
|
|
33,978 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
|
|
33,914 |
|
* See Note
15
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Shares |
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
Compensation |
|
Treasury |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
in Treasury |
|
Shares |
|
Warrants |
|
Earnings |
|
Expense |
|
Shares |
|
Loss |
|
Total |
|
Balance,
January 31, 2004 (as restated)* |
|
|
33,991 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
143,077 |
|
|
$ |
6,074 |
|
|
$ |
62,204 |
|
|
$ |
(635 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,011 |
) |
|
$ |
204,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss(as restated)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
Forfeiture of restricted shares |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
Balance, October 30, 2004
(as restated)* |
|
|
34,084 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
143,395 |
|
|
$ |
6,074 |
|
|
$ |
59,670 |
|
|
$ |
(300 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,011 |
) |
|
$ |
202,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
January 29, 2005 (as restated)* |
|
|
34,111 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
143,477 |
|
|
$ |
6,074 |
|
|
$ |
42,756 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,068 |
) |
|
$ |
185,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (as restated)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,310 |
) |
Initial public offering of
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,474 |
|
Capital transactions of
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
5,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,493 |
|
Tax benefit related to stock
options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,158 |
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Warrant reclass to liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,074 |
) |
Warrant adjustment to fair value (as restated)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,120 |
) |
|
Balance,
October 29, 2005 (as restated)* |
|
|
39,537 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
158,008 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
34,924 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,068 |
) |
|
$ |
185,803 |
|
|
*See Note 15
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-5-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Restated* |
|
|
Restated* |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(112,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,534 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount on debt |
|
|
4,116 |
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
42,998 |
|
|
|
40,011 |
|
Change in
fair value of warrants ($71,147 related party) |
|
|
70,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(3,579 |
) |
|
|
(10,567 |
) |
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised |
|
|
10,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary |
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
Other |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Change in working capital, assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(40,397 |
) |
|
|
(4,222 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(144,852 |
) |
|
|
(164,494 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(7,903 |
) |
|
|
(14,305 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
61,145 |
|
|
|
128,283 |
|
Proceeds from lease incentives |
|
|
8,972 |
|
|
|
10,396 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
35,983 |
|
|
|
16,956 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(70,621 |
) |
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(33,400 |
) |
|
|
(56,754 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Tradename acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,056 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(33,302 |
) |
|
|
(60,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in revolving credit facility |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
60,000 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,527 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
24,493 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Proceeds from sale of stock of subsidiary |
|
|
277,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
153,443 |
|
|
|
59,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
49,520 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
29,258 |
|
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
78,778 |
|
|
$ |
17,666 |
|
|
* See Note
15
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-6-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. |
|
BUSINESS OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
Retail Ventures, Inc. (Retail Ventures) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and DSW Inc.
(DSW), a controlled subsidiary, and DSWs wholly-owned subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
(DSWSW), are herein referred to collectively as the Company. Retail Ventures operates three
segments in the United States of America (United States); Value City Department Stores LLC
(Value City), DSW, and Filenes Basement, Inc. (Filenes Basement). |
|
|
|
On October 8, 2003, the Company reorganized its corporate structure into a holding company form
whereby Retail Ventures, an Ohio corporation, became the successor issuer to Value City
Department Stores, Inc. As a result of the reorganization, Value City Department Stores, Inc.
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. In connection with the reorganization,
holders of common shares of Value City Department Stores, Inc. became holders of an identical
number of common shares of Retail Ventures. The reorganization was affected by a merger which
was previously approved by Value City Department Stores Inc.s shareholders. Since October 2003,
Retail Ventures common shares have been listed for trading under the ticker symbol RVI on the
New York Stock Exchange. |
|
|
|
In December 2004, the Company completed another corporate reorganization whereby Value City
Department Stores, Inc. merged with and into Value City, a newly created, wholly-owned
subsidiary of Retail Ventures. In connection with this reorganization, Value City transferred
all the issued and outstanding shares of DSW and Filenes Basement to Retail Ventures in
exchange for a promissory note. |
|
|
|
Value City. Located in the Midwestern, Eastern and Southern United States and operating for
over 80 years principally under the name Value City, this segments strategy has been to provide
exceptional value by offering a broad selection of brand name merchandise at prices
substantially below conventional retail prices. At October 29, 2005, there were 114 Value City
stores in operation. |
|
|
|
DSW. Located throughout the United States, the DSW stores offer a wide selection of
brand name and designer dress, casual and athletic footwear for men and women. As of October 29,
2005, there were 197 DSW stores in operation. Additionally, pursuant to a license agreement with
Filenes Basement, DSW supplies leased shoe departments in most Filenes Basement stores.
Results of operations of the leased shoe departments are included with the DSW segment. In July
2002 and June 2004, respectively, DSW entered into supply agreements with Stein Mart, Inc.
(Stein Mart) and Gordmans, Inc. (Gordmans) to supply merchandise to some of the Stein Marts
and all of the Gordmans shoe departments. As of October 29, 2005, DSW supplied 157 leased
departments for Stein Mart, 53 for Gordmans, 25 for Filenes Basement and one for Frugal
Fannies Fashion Warehouse. Results of operations under the supply agreements are included with
the DSW segment. During the three months and nine months ended October 29, 2005, DSW opened 13
and 27 new DSW stores, respectively, and, during the nine months ended October 29, |
-7-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
2005, re-categorized two DSW/Filenes Basement combination store locations as leased shoe
departments which are included in the DSW segment. |
|
|
|
Filenes Basement. Filenes Basement stores are located primarily in major metropolitan areas
of the United States such as Boston, New York, Atlanta, Chicago and Washington, D.C. Filenes
Basement focuses on providing top-tier brand name merchandise at everyday low prices for mens
and womens apparel, jewelry, shoes, accessories and home goods. As of October 29, 2005, there
were 27 Filenes Basement stores in operation. |
|
2. |
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with Retail Ventures 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 29, 2005, as amended and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
on April 11, 2006 (the 2004 Annual Report). This
Form 10-Q reflects all changes incorporated into the Retail
Ventures Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
July 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to
present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations for the
periods presented. |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements are reported on the full consolidation method and include
100% of the assets and liabilities of all controlled subsidiaries. The ownership interests of
minority participants are recorded as Minority Interest. All material intercompany
transactions and balances are eliminated. |
|
3. |
|
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING OF SUBSIDIARY |
|
|
|
On July 5, 2005, DSW completed an initial public offering (IPO) of 16,171,875 Class A common
shares sold at a price to the public of $19.00 per share and raising net
proceeds of $285.8 million, net of the underwriters commission and before estimated expenses of
approximately $7.9 million. Following the IPO, Retail Ventures owns approximately 63.0% of DSWs
outstanding common shares and approximately 93.2% of the combined voting power of such shares.
In conjunction with the separation of their businesses following the IPO, Retail Ventures and
DSW entered into several agreements, including, among others, a master separation agreement, a
shared services agreement and a tax separation agreement. Retail Ventures current intent is to
continue to hold its DSW common shares, except to the extent necessary to satisfy obligations
under warrants it has granted to certain of its lenders. Retail Ventures is subject to (a)
contractual obligations with its lenders to retain ownership of at least 55% by value of the
common shares of DSW for so long as Retail Ventures senior loan facility remains outstanding
and (b) contractual obligations with its warrantholders to retain enough DSW common shares to be
able to satisfy its obligations to deliver such shares to its warrantholders if the
warrantholders elect to exercise their warrants in full for DSW Class A common shares. In
addition, Retail Ventures has agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of any of the DSW common
shares for a period of 180 days following the IPO without the prior written consent of Lehman
Brothers Inc. on behalf of the |
-8-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
underwriters of the IPO. Retail Ventures accounted for the sale of DSW as a capital transaction.
Associated with this transaction, a deferred tax liability of $68.7 million was recorded. |
|
4. |
|
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
Retail Ventures has various stock-based employee compensation plans. The Company accounts for
those plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Accordingly, no stock-based
employee compensation cost has been recognized for the fixed stock option plans or the
discontinued stock purchase plan, which was discontinued at the end of May 2005. The following
table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 Restated * |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 Restated
*
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
$ |
56,400 |
|
|
$ |
(1,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(112,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,534 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation (benefit) expense
included in reported net income,
net of tax |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for all awards, net of tax |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(3,775 |
) |
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
|
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
$ |
56,093 |
|
|
$ |
(1,810 |
) |
|
$ |
(112,888 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.95 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.95 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
* See Note 15
5. |
|
TRADENAMES AND OTHER INTANGIBLES |
|
|
|
During the nine months ended October 30, 2004, Retail Ventures acquired the Leslie Fay
tradename for approximately $4.1 million. This amortizing asset has been assigned an anticipated
life of 15 years. |
-9-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
6. |
|
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
On July 5, 2005, Retail Ventures amended or terminated the then-existing credit facilities and
other debt obligations of Value City and its other affiliates, including certain facilities
under which DSW had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and co-guarantor, as follows: |
|
|
|
Amended and Restatement of Value City Revolving Credit Facility. |
|
|
|
The Company and its affiliates amended and restated the Loan and Security Agreement originally
entered into in June 2002 (the Revolving Credit Facility). Pursuant to the $275 million
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, entered into on July 5, 2005, (i) DSW was
released from its obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) the lenders released
their liens on the shares of DSWs capital stock held by Retail Ventures and the capital stock
of DSWSW held by DSW, and (iii) leasehold mortgages which had been granted by DSW and DSWSW in
2002 to secure obligations under the June 2002 Revolving Credit Facility were released. Under
the July 2005 Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit Facility), Retail Ventures and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are named as
co-borrowers. The Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility has borrowing base restrictions
and provides for borrowings at variable interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the
Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin. Retail Ventures obligations under the Amended and
Restated Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of the personal
property of Retail Ventures and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including a pledge of all of
Retail Ventures shares of DSW. In addition, the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility
contains usual and customary covenants that, among other things, restrict Retail Ventures
ability to grant liens on its assets, incur additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay
cash dividends and redeem its stock, enter into transactions with affiliates and merge or
consolidate with another entity. |
|
|
|
Amendment of Value City Term Loan Facility. |
|
|
|
The Company and its affiliates amended the Financing Agreement, as amended, among Cerberus
Partners, L.P. (Cerberus), as agent, and other parties named therein, originally entered into
in June 2002 (as so amended, the Term Loan Facility). Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to
Financing Agreement entered into July 5, 2005, (i) DSW was released from its obligations as a
co-borrower, (ii) Value City repaid all the term loan indebtedness, and (iii) the Company agreed
to amend the issued and outstanding 2,954,792 warrants (Term Loan Warrants) to provide
Cerberus, Schottenstein Stores Corporation (SSC) and Back Bay Capital Funding LLC (Back Bay)
the right, from time to time, in whole or in part, to (A) acquire Retail Ventures common shares
at the then current conversion price (subject to the existing anti-dilution provisions), (B)
acquire from Retail Ventures Class A common shares of DSW at an exercise price per share equal
to the price of shares sold to the public in DSWs IPO, or (C) acquire a combination thereof.
Effective November 23, 2005, Back Bay transferred and assigned its Term Loan Warrants to
Millennium Partners, L.P. Although Retail Ventures has no present intention or plan to
undertake a spin-off of its DSW common shares to Retail Ventures shareholders, in the event
that Retail Ventures would effect such |
-10-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
a spin-off in the future, the holders of outstanding unexercised Term Loan Warrants would
receive the same number of DSW Class A common shares that they would have received had they
exercised their Term Loan Warrants in full for Retail Ventures common shares immediately prior
to the record date of such spin-off, without regard to any limitations on exercise contained in
the Term Loan Warrants. Following the completion of any such spin-off, the Term Loan Warrants
would be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares. The Company has granted the Term
Loan Facility lenders registration rights with respect to the shares issuable upon exercise of
the Term Loan Warrants. In June 2002, a value of $6.1 million was ascribed to the Term Loan
Warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free
interest rate of 5.6%; expected life of 10 years; expected
volatility of 47%; illiquidity discount of 10%; and an expected dividend yield of 0%. The related debt discount was amortized
into interest expense over the life of the debt. |
|
|
|
Amendment and Restatement of Value City Convertible Loan Facility. |
|
|
|
The Company and its affiliates amended and restated the Amended and Restated Senior Convertible
Loan Agreement, as amended, with Cerberus, as agent and lender, SSC, as lender, and the other
parties named therein, originally entered into in June 2002 (the Convertible Loan Facility).
Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement (the Second Amended and
Restated Senior Loan Agreement), entered into July 5, 2005, (i) DSW was released from its
obligations as a co-guarantor, (ii) Value City repaid $25 million of this facility, (iii) the
remaining $50 million convertible loan was converted into a non-convertible loan, (iv) the
capital stock of DSW held by Retail Ventures continues to secure the amended loan facility, and
(v) Retail Ventures issued to SSC and Cerberus convertible warrants (the Conversion Warrants)
which will be exercisable from time to time until the later of June 11, 2007 and the repayment
in full of Value Citys obligations under the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement.
The July 2005 Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement is not eligible for prepayment
until June 11, 2007. Under the Conversion Warrants, SSC and Cerberus will have the right, from
time to time, in whole or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures common shares at the
conversion price referred to in the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement (subject
to existing anti-dilution provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A common shares
of DSW at an exercise price of $19.00 per share which equals the price of the shares sold to the
public in DSWs IPO (subject to anti-dilution provisions similar to those in the existing
warrants held by SSC and Cerberus), or (iii) acquire a combination thereof. Although Retail
Ventures has no present intention or plan to undertake a spin-off of its DSW common shares to
Retail Ventures shareholders, in the event that Retail Ventures would effect such a spin-off in
the future, the holders of outstanding unexercised Conversion Warrants would receive the same
number of DSW Class A common shares that they would have received had they exercised their
Conversion Warrants in full for Retail Ventures common shares immediately prior to the record
date of such spin-off, without regard to any limitations on exercise contained in the Conversion
Warrants. Following the completion of any such spin-off, the Conversion Warrants would be
exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares. |
|
|
|
Warrants |
-11-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
As a result of the previously discussed credit facilities modifications made on July 5, 2005,
the detached Term Loan Warrants and detached Conversion Warrants with dual optionality qualified
as derivatives under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). As a result of the
modifications, the fair values of the Term Loan Warrants and Conversion Warrants (together, the
Warrants) have been recorded on the balance sheet within current liabilities. As the Term
Loan Warrants had previously been recorded on the balance sheet within equity, the difference of
$20.1 million, between the book value of the Warrants and the fair value at the time the
Warrants were reclassified to a liability, was recorded to paid in capital. The liability has
been recorded for the Conversion Warrants for the full amount of their fair value as a result of
the modifications and a non-cash charge has been recorded within the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. Regarding the change in the fair value of the Warrants, the Company recorded a gain
of $67.0 million in the three-month period ended October 29, 2005 and a charge of $70.6 million
for the nine months then ended. The initial recording of the Conversion Warrants was $134.2
million. No tax benefit has been recognized in connection with this charge. |
|
|
|
|
These derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, as changes
in the fair values are recognized in earnings in the period of change. |
|
|
|
|
Retail Ventures estimates the fair values of derivatives based on pricing models using current
market rates and records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair market
value of derivative instruments was $96.8 million at October 29, 2005. There were no derivative
instruments outstanding at January 29, 2005. As the Warrants may be exercised for either common
shares of RVI or common shares of DSW owned by RVI, the settlement of the Warrants will not
result in a cash outlay by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
The above amendments to the Term Loan Facility and the Convertible Loan Facility were viewed in
the aggregate and deemed to be modifications. |
|
7. |
|
PENSION BENEFIT PLANS |
|
|
|
The Company has three qualified defined pension benefit plans which it assumed at the time of
previous acquisitions of three separate companies. The Companys funding policy is to contribute
an amount annually that satisfies the minimum funding requirements of ERISA and that is tax
deductible under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Contributions are provided not
only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those anticipated to be earned in
the future. The Company uses a January 31 measurement date for its pension benefit plans. |
|
|
|
The following table shows the components of net periodic benefit cost of the Companys pension
benefit plans for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004: |
-12-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
|
|
As of October 29, 2005, the Company has contributed the $2.5 million required for fiscal 2005 to
meet the minimum funding requirements of ERISA. During the nine months ended October 30, 2004,
the Company contributed approximately $1.7 million to its pension benefit plans. |
|
8. |
|
OTHER BENEFIT PLANS |
|
|
|
The Company maintains a Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the 401(k) Plan) for its employees.
Employees who attain age twenty-one are eligible to defer compensation as of the first day of
the month following 60 days of employment and may contribute up to 30% of their compensation to
the 401(k) Plan on a pre-tax basis, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations. As of the
first day of the month following an employees completion of one year of service as defined
under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, the Company matches employee deferrals into the 401(k) Plan
as follows: 100% on the first 3% of eligible compensation deferred and 50% on the next 2% of
eligible compensation deferred. Additionally, the Company may contribute a discretionary profit
sharing amount to the 401(k) Plan each year. In fiscal 2004 the Company contributed $1.3 million
to the 401(k) Plan for discretionary profit sharing. As of October 29, 2005 the Company has made
no discretionary profit sharing contributions for fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
The Company identified the following issue involving its 401(k) Plan: |
|
|
|
It is the position of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) SEC that, if
participants 401(k) plan contributions can be invested in employer securities, all of the
securities offered pursuant to the plan must be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
Securities Act). This is true regardless whether the plan acquires the shares from the
employer or on the open market and whether the shares are purchased with employee contributions
or the companys match. Based on this interpretation of the Securities Act, Retail Ventures
registered 600,000 common shares for inclusion in the Retail Ventures, Inc. Common Stock Fund
under the 401(k) Plan. |
|
|
|
Although all purchases by the custodian of the 401(k) Plan were made in the open market and in a
manner consistent with the 401(k) Plan and the investment elections of the 401(k) Plan
participants, Retail Ventures has determined that (i) more common shares have been purchased by
the custodian of the 401(k) Plan and allocated to the Retail Ventures, Inc. |
-13-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock Fund than were registered in accordance with the Securities Act and (ii) certain
participants in the 401(k) Plan may not have received the prospectus required to be delivered
under the Securities Act. |
|
|
|
Effective November 29, 2005, Retail Ventures commenced an offer for a 30-day right of rescission
with regard to all of its common shares purchased by the custodian of the 401(k) Plan and
included in units purchased by 401(k) Plan participants between July 12, 2003 and December 22,
2004. Under the rescission offer, which will apply to approximately 700,000 Retail Ventures
common shares, if 401(k) Plan participants have sold units at a loss, Retail Ventures will
credit to their 401(k) Plan account an amount equal to the price per unit they paid less the
proceeds from the sale of the units plus applicable interest. Additionally, if 401(k) Plan
participants continue to hold the units and the market price of the Retail Ventures common
shares as of the expiration date of the rescission offer is less than the price they paid for
the units plus applicable interest, Retail Ventures will repurchase units that are subject to
the rescission offer and will credit their 401(k) Plan account with an amount equal to the price
per unit they paid plus interest from the date of purchase of the units through the date the
credit is made. The rescission offer expires after December 29, 2005. |
|
|
|
SSC, as the primary sponsor of the 401(k) Plan, and Retail Ventures, as an additional sponsor of
the 401(k) Plan, elected to close the Retail Ventures, Inc. Common Stock Fund to additional
investments effective July 1, 2005. Subsequent to December 22, 2004, all 401(k) Plan
participants received registered securities and the prospectus required to be delivered under
the Securities Act. |
|
|
|
The Company provided an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) for its employees until the end of
May 2005, when the ESPP was discontinued. Eligibility requirements were similar to those of the
401(k) Plan. Eligible employees could purchase common shares of the Company through payroll
deductions. The Company matched 15% of employee investments up to a maximum investment level.
ESPP costs to the Company for all fiscal periods presented were not material to the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
While investigating the unregistered sale of shares in connection with the 401(k) Plan, it was
also discovered that approximately 640,000 Retail Ventures common shares acquired by our
employees through the ESPP may not have been registered under applicable federal or state law.
While all of the Retail Ventures common shares were acquired on the open market and in
compliance with the provisions of the ESPP, because the shares were not registered, ESPP
participants may have a right to rescind their purchases. The Company believes that, at this
time, damages resulting from successful claims against the Company for its failure to register
the common shares that were purchased through the ESPP would have a negligible effect on the
Company. At this time, the Company does not intend to make a rescission offer to participants
in the ESPP. |
|
9. |
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
-14-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
Basic earnings per share are based on the net income (loss) and a simple weighted average of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects, in addition to the simple
weighted average common shares outstanding, the potential dilution of common shares related to
outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARS) and warrants, calculated using the
treasury stock method and convertible debt calculated using the if-converted method. The
numerator for the diluted earnings per share calculation is the net income (loss) adjusted to
remove the effect of interest, adjusted for tax, on the pre-amended Convertible Loan Facility
assuming such effect is not anti-dilutive (in which case the interest would be included in the
numerator and the potential shares excluded from the denominator). The denominator is the
weighted average shares outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
39,479 |
|
|
|
33,978 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
|
|
33,914 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive SARS |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive term loan warrants |
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive conversion warrants |
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for computation of
dilutive earnings per share |
|
|
61,514 |
|
|
|
33,978 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
|
|
33,914 |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and the three and nine months ended October 30, 2004,
all potentially dilutive instruments (stock options, SARS, warrants and convertible debt) were
anti-dilutive. |
|
|
|
There were securities outstanding at October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004 that were
anti-dilutive and, therefore, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per
share. The total amount of securities outstanding that were not included in the computation of
dilutive earnings per share for the periods presented are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Stock options |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
7,789 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
7,789 |
|
SARS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
Term loan warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
4,413 |
|
|
|
2,955 |
|
Conversion warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
Total potentially dilutive instruments |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
28,604 |
|
|
|
24,688 |
|
|
|
28,604 |
|
|
|
|
Reductions to compensation costs of $0.9 million and $0.1 million, net of tax, were recorded
during the three months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, relating to SARS. |
-15-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
Compensation charges of $3.1 million and $0.5 million, net of tax, were recorded during the nine
months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively, relating to SARS. |
-16-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
10. |
|
ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
|
|
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) periodically issues Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS), some of which require implementation by a date falling within or
after the close of the fiscal year. |
|
|
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No.
123R). This statement revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS
No. 123) and requires a fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options and recognition of those expenses in the statements
of operations. SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which
an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services and focuses on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.
In addition, SFAS No. 123R will require the recognition of compensation expense over the period
during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. The effective
date of this statement was originally established to be interim and annual periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. In April 2005, however, the SEC delayed the compliance date for SFAS No.
123R until the beginning of the Companys 2006 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of this statement and has not yet determined the method of adoption under SFAS No.
123R and whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the pro forma
disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. |
|
11. |
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
|
|
|
The balance sheet caption Accumulated other comprehensive loss of $7.1 million at each of
October 29, 2005 and January 29, 2005, relates to the Companys minimum pension liability, net
of income tax. |
|
12. |
|
TAX VALUATION |
|
|
|
The Company establishes valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when the amount of expected
future taxable income is not likely to support the use of the deduction or credit. The Company
has determined that there is a probability that future taxable income may not be sufficient to
fully utilize deferred tax assets (state net operating losses and charitable contribution carry
forwards) which expire in future years at various dates depending on the state jurisdiction. The
allowance at October 29, 2005 and at January 29, 2005 was $9.7 and $4.2 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
The tax rate of 1.5% for the nine months ended October 29, 2005, reflects: (a) the negative
impact of the non-deductible warrant amortization included for book income but not for tax
income, (b) the increase of $5.5 million in the valuation allowance and (c) the write-off of
$5.2 million of deferred tax assets no longer deductible as a result of tax regulation changes
enacted by the State of Ohio legislature related to the new Commercial Activity Tax in Ohio. The
negative impacts discussed above were offset by the $10.2 million tax effect of stock |
|
-17-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
option exercises that occurred during the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and that are
deductible for tax income but not for book income. |
|
13. |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, |
|
October 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties |
|
$ |
7,583 |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
15,104 |
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
15,282 |
|
|
$ |
11,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash
investing and operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in accounts payable due to asset purchases |
|
$ |
3,530 |
|
|
$ |
(1,827 |
) |
14. |
|
SEGMENT REPORTING |
|
|
|
The Company is managed in three operating segments: Value City, DSW and Filenes Basement. All
of the operations are located in the United States. The Company has identified such segments
based on chief operating decision maker responsibilities and measures segment profit (loss) as
operating profit (loss), which is defined as income (loss) before interest expense (income) and
benefit (provision) for income taxes and minority interest. |
|
|
|
The Companys business segments were realigned at the beginning of fiscal 2005 to reflect how
the Company establishes strategic goals and manages the business. The realignment resulted in
the Filenes Basement shoe business being included within the DSW segment. The fiscal 2004
presentation has been retroactively adjusted to conform to this realignment. |
|
|
|
The tables below present segment statement of operations information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filenes |
|
|
|
|
Value City |
|
DSW |
|
Basement |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Three months ended October 29, 2005 (Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
341,687 |
|
|
$ |
302,240 |
|
|
$ |
102,174 |
|
|
$ |
746,101 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
43,070 |
|
|
|
17,728 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
61,855 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,176 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
14,070 |
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
(6,965 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
6,006 |
|
|
|
5,740 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
12,943 |
|
-18-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filenes |
|
|
|
|
Value City |
|
DSW |
|
Basement |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Three months ended October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
347,154 |
|
|
$ |
262,444 |
|
|
$ |
90,140 |
|
|
$ |
699,738 |
|
Operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(6,853 |
) |
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
(1,986 |
) |
|
|
7,950 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,445 |
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
14,056 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
7,931 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
9,938 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
(6,371 |
) |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
8,819 |
|
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
8,723 |
|
|
|
24,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filenes |
|
|
|
|
Value City |
|
DSW |
|
Basement |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Nine months ended October 29, 2005 (Restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
954,312 |
|
|
$ |
860,257 |
|
|
$ |
278,311 |
|
|
$ |
2,092,880 |
|
Operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(128,819 |
) |
|
|
53,469 |
|
|
|
(11,992 |
) |
|
|
(87,342 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,848 |
|
|
|
14,229 |
|
|
|
6,921 |
|
|
|
42,998 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
12,211 |
|
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
23,314 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
13,616 |
|
|
|
(17,942 |
) |
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
13,139 |
|
|
|
21,248 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
36,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
552,392 |
|
|
|
481,788 |
|
|
|
147,873 |
|
|
|
1,182,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filenes |
|
|
|
|
Value City |
|
DSW |
|
Basement |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Nine months ended October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,005,763 |
|
|
$ |
729,406 |
|
|
$ |
242,523 |
|
|
$ |
1,977,692 |
|
Operating (loss) profit |
|
|
(12,640 |
) |
|
|
46,123 |
|
|
|
(7,681 |
) |
|
|
25,802 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,341 |
|
|
|
13,663 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
40,011 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
23,851 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
29,247 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
14,459 |
|
|
|
(17,584 |
) |
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
17,887 |
|
|
|
19,802 |
|
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
54,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
462,838 |
|
|
|
395,437 |
|
|
|
118,151 |
|
|
|
976,426 |
|
-19-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
15. |
|
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The Company has restated its October 29, 2005 and January 29, 2005 condensed consolidated balance
sheets contained herein to correct errors in retained earnings and deferred income taxes related to
matters described in the January 29, 2005
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 3. These adjustments caused a
reduction in opening retained earnings by $7.5 million, reduced deferred income tax assets by $6.9
million and increased accrued taxes by $0.6 million. This adjustment had no effect on the
previously reported results of operations and had no effect on net cash or the income tax returns
filed by the Company.
Subsequent to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements in Form 10-Q/A (Amendment
No. 1), the Companys management determined that the block sale
discount included in the determination of the fair value of the
warrant liability should be eliminated. As a result, the warrant
liability recorded at the initial issuance of the warrants and the
subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrant liability at each
reporting date has been restated from the amount previously recorded
to exclude the block sale discount. As of October 29, 2005 the correction of
the error increased the Warrant liability by $48.3 million,
reduced Retained earnings by $39.5 million and
reduced Common shares by $8.8 million. The correction of the error for the three months ended October 29, 2005
increased by $2.2 million all of the following (i) Change in fair value of warrants (ii) Operating
profit (iii) Income before income taxes (iv) Income before minority interest
and (v) Net income. The correction of the error for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 increased by $39.5 million all of the following (i) Change
in fair value of warrants (ii) Operating loss (iii) Loss
before income taxes (iv) Loss before minority interest and (v) Net loss. The basic and diluted earnings per
share increased to $1.43 and $0.92, respectively for the three months ended October 29, 2005 and
basic and diluted loss per share increased to $2.94 for the nine months ended October 29, 2005.
The
following is a summary of the effects of these changes on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October
29, 2005 |
|
|
|
As
Reported |
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 |
|
|
Amendment
No. 2 |
|
As
Restated |
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
$ |
58,288 |
|
|
$ |
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,284 |
Total current assets |
|
|
|
832,152 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
830,148 |
Total assets |
|
|
|
1,184,057 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,182,053 |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
186,853 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,461 |
Warrant
liability ($47,948, $47,821, $95,769-related party) |
|
|
|
48,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,308 |
|
|
96,780 |
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
508,640 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
48,308 |
|
|
557,556 |
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
126,491 |
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,416 |
Common shares |
|
|
|
166,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,792 |
) |
|
158,008 |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
81,977 |
|
|
|
(7,537 |
) |
|
|
(39,516 |
) |
|
34,924 |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
241,648 |
|
|
|
(7,537 |
) |
|
|
(48,308 |
) |
|
185,803 |
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
1,184,057 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,182,053 |
-20-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 |
|
|
Amendment
No. 2 |
|
As
restated |
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
64,359 |
|
|
$ |
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,355 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
595,736 |
|
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
593,732 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets |
|
|
37,806 |
|
|
|
(4,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
32,881 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
983,355 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
976,426 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
150,939 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,547 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
359,556 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,164 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
50,293 |
|
|
|
(7,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
42,756 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
192,714 |
|
|
|
(7,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
185,177 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
983,355 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
976,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended October 29, 2005 |
|
|
As
Reported |
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 |
|
|
Amendment
No. 2 |
|
|
As
Restated |
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
fair value of warrants ($64,193, $2,214, $66,407 - related party) |
|
$ |
64,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
|
$ |
66,997 |
Operating profit |
|
|
59,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
61,855 |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
56,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
58,610 |
Income before minority interest |
|
|
58,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
60,422 |
Net income |
|
|
54,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
56,400 |
Basic and
diluted income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
Diluted |
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months ended October 29, 2005 |
|
|
As
reported |
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 |
|
|
Amendment
No. 2 |
|
|
As
Restated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
fair value of warrants ($(31,590), $(39,557), $(71,147) - related party) |
|
$ |
(31,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(70,586 |
) |
Operating loss |
|
|
(47,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,516 |
) |
|
|
(87,342 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(71,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,516 |
) |
|
|
(110,656 |
) |
Loss before minority interest |
|
|
(69,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,516 |
) |
|
|
(109,011 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(72,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,516 |
) |
|
|
(112,310 |
) |
Basic and
diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(1.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.04 |
) |
|
|
(2.94 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
(1.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.04 |
) |
|
|
(2.94 |
) |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(72,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39,516 |
) |
|
$ |
(112,310 |
) |
Change in
fair value of warrants ($31,590, $39,557, $71,147 - related party) |
|
|
31,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,516 |
|
|
|
70,586 |
As Filed with the SEC on December 8, 2005
In February 2005, the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC issued a letter to the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants expressing its views regarding certain
lease related accounting issues and their application under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Following the release of the SEC letter, many retail companies
reviewed their previous interpretations of these lease accounting issues and announced that
they would restate their results for previous periods.
After reviewing its accounting for leasing transactions, the Company concluded that it would
correct certain errors in its accounting for two types of leasing transactions. First, the
Companys statements of cash flows reflected construction allowances as a reduction of capital
expenditures (within investing cash flows) rather than as an operating lease activity
(within operating cash flows). Second, the Company had excluded the build-out period of its
stores from its straight line rent expense calculations.
The Company restated its condensed consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity
and cash flows for the interim periods ended October 30, 2004, and the effected notes therein.
The Company also restated the segment financial information for the interim periods ended
October 30, 2004 (see Note 14). The impact of the restatement was an increase in net loss of
$1.2 million for the nine months ended October 30, 2004 and an increase in net loss of $0.4
million for the three months ended October 30, 2004.
In the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended October 30,
2004, the Company excluded from cash used for capital expenditures and the change in accounts
payable, the amount of asset purchases included in accounts payable, to be consistent with the
October 29, 2005 presentation.
The significant effects of the corrections of the errors to the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
$ |
(273,560 |
) |
|
$ |
(402 |
) |
|
$ |
(273,962 |
) |
Operating profit |
|
|
8,352 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
7,950 |
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Nine
months ended October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(777,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,207 |
) |
|
$ |
(778,232 |
) |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
27,009 |
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
25,802 |
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(2,238 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,207 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,534 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,507 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
40,011 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other
noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(9,008 |
) |
|
|
(1,559 |
) |
|
|
(10,567 |
) |
Proceeds from lease incentives |
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
10,396 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
16,485 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
16,956 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities |
|
|
(5,671 |
) |
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(50,267 |
) |
|
|
(8,605 |
) |
|
|
(58,872 |
) |
|
16. |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
On March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures announced that it had learned of the theft of credit card and
other purchase information from a portion of DSW customers. On April 18, 2005, Retail Ventures
issued the findings from its investigation into the theft. The theft took place primarily over
two weeks and covered all customers who made purchases at 108 DSW stores, primarily during a
three-month-period from mid-November 2004 to mid-February 2005. Transaction information
involving approximately 1.4 million credit cards was obtained. For each card, the stolen
information included credit card or debit card numbers, name and transaction amount. In
addition, data from transactions involving approximately 96,000 checks were stolen. In these
cases, checking account numbers and drivers license numbers were obtained. |
|
|
|
The Company has contacted and is cooperating with law enforcement and other authorities with
regard to this matter. To mitigate potential negative effects on its business and financial
performance, the Company is working with credit card companies and issuers and has contacted as
many of its affected customers as possible. In addition, the Company worked with a leading
computer security firm to minimize the risk of any further data theft. The Company is involved
in several legal proceedings arising out of this incident that, after consultation with counsel,
it believes will not exceed the reserves the Company has currently recorded. |
|
|
|
As of October 29, 2005, the Company estimates that the potential exposure for losses related to
this theft, including exposure under currently pending proceedings, ranges from |
-21-
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
approximately $6.5 million to approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors, including the
early development of information regarding the theft and recoverability under insurance
policies, if any, there is no amount in the estimated range that represents a better estimate
than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, the Company has accrued a charge to operations in the first
quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low end of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million. As
the situation develops and more information becomes available, the amount of the reserve may
increase or decrease accordingly. The amount of any such change may be material. |
|
|
|
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional proceedings or claims brought
against the Company in the future. We have contested and will continue to vigorously contest the
claims made against us and will continue to explore our defenses and possible claims against
others. |
|
|
|
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of
its business. The Company estimates the range of liability related to pending litigation where
the amount and range of loss can be estimated. The Company records its best estimate of a loss
when the loss is considered probable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of
estimated loss, the Company records the minimum estimated liability related to the claim. In the
opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these legal proceedings will
not be material. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential
liability related to its pending litigation and revises the estimates. Revisions in the
Companys estimates and potential liability could materially impact its results of operations. |
-22-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
As used
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (this Report or
Form 10-Q) and except as the context otherwise
may require, Company, we, us, and our refers to Retail Ventures, Inc. (Retail Ventures),
and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including but not limited to, Value City Department Stores LLC
(Value City) and Filenes Basement, Inc. (Filenes Basement), its controlled subsidiary, DSW
Inc. (DSW), and DSWs wholly-owned subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW).
As discussed in Note 15 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements, the Companys
October 29, 2005 and October
30, 2004 condensed consolidated financial statements have been restated. This discussion and
analysis gives effect to the restatement.
RISK FACTORS AND SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
We caution that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995) contained in this Report and/or other risk factors that may be
described in the Safe Harbor Statement and Business Risks section of the Companys 2004 Annual
Report, or contained in other filings with the SEC or made by our management involve risks and
uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various important factors. The following factors,
among others, in some cases have affected the matters discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These same factors could cause our
future financial performance in fiscal 2005 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in any such forward-looking statements. These factors include: decline in demand for our
merchandise, our ability to achieve our business plans, expected cash flow from operations, vendors
and their factor relations, flow of merchandise, compliance with our credit agreements, our ability
to strengthen our liquidity and increase our credit availability, the availability of desirable
store locations on suitable terms, changes in consumer spending patterns, marketing strategies,
consumer preferences and overall economic conditions, the impact of competition and pricing,
changes in weather patterns, seasonality of operations, changes in fuel and energy costs, changes
in existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas, paper and printing costs, the ability to hire
and train associates, development of management information systems and other factors set forth
in Exhibit 99 attached hereto.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Managements Discussion and Analysis discusses the results of operations and financial condition as
reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. As discussed in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements that are included in our 2004 Annual Report, the preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and
contingencies at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis,
-23-
management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including, but not limited to, those related to
inventory valuation, depreciation, amortization, recoverability of long-lived assets including
intangible assets, the calculation of retirement benefits, estimates for self insurance reserves
for health and welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance, income taxes, contingencies,
litigation and revenue recognition. Management bases its estimates and judgments on its historical
experience and other relevant factors, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. The process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account
factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, product mix, and
in some cases, actuarial and appraisal techniques. We constantly re-evaluate these significant
factors and make adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate.
While we believe that our historical experience and other factors considered provide a
meaningful basis for the accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated
statements, we cannot guarantee that our estimates and assumptions will be accurate. As the
determination of these estimates requires the exercise of judgment, actual results inevitably will
differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
We believe the following represent the most critical estimates and assumptions, among others, used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We have discussed the selection,
application and disclosure of the critical accounting policies with our audit committee.
|
|
|
Revenue recognition. Revenues from merchandise sales are recognized at the
point of sale and are net of returns and exclude sales tax. Revenue from gift
cards is deferred and is recognized upon redemption of the gift cards. Layaway
sales are recognized when the merchandise has been paid for in full. The
layaway program was discontinued in the current year. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales and merchandise inventories. We use the retail method of
accounting for substantially all of our merchandise inventories. Merchandise
inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in,
first-out basis, or market, using the retail inventory method. The retail
inventory method is widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality.
Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the
resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail
ratio to the retail value of inventories. The cost of the inventory reflected
on our consolidated balance sheet is decreased by charges to cost of sales at
the time the retail value of the inventory is lowered through the use of
markdowns. Accordingly earnings are negatively impacted as merchandise is
marked down prior to sale. Reserves to value inventory at the lower of cost or
market were $43.7 million at October 29, 2005 and $42.8 million at January 29,
2005. |
|
|
|
|
Inherent in the calculation of inventories are certain significant management
judgments and estimates, including setting the original merchandise retail value
or markon, markups of initial prices established, reduction of pricing due |
-24-
|
|
|
to customers value perception or perceived value known as markdowns, and
estimates of losses between physical inventory counts or shrinkage, which,
combined with the averaging process within the retail method, can significantly
impact the ending inventory valuation at cost, and the resulting gross margins. |
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment and long-lived assets. We must periodically evaluate the
carrying amount of our long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, and
finite life intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant such a
review to ascertain if any assets have been impaired. The carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is considered impaired when the carrying value of the asset
exceeds the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) from
the asset. Our reviews are conducted down at the lowest identifiable level,
which include a store. The impairment loss recognized is the excess of the
carrying value, based on discounted future cash flows, of the asset over its
fair value. Should an impairment loss be realized, it will be included in
operating expenses. Assets acquired for stores that have been previously
impaired are not capitalized when acquired if the stores expected future cash
flow (undiscounted and without interest) remains negative. During the nine
months ended October 29, 2005, there were no impairments recorded. For the
nine months ended October 30, 2004, we recorded an impairment of $0.7 million
related to the Value City segment for store assets. |
|
|
|
|
We believe at this time that the remaining long-lived assets carrying values
and useful lives continue to be appropriate. To the extent these future
projections or our strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may
differ from our current estimates. |
|
|
|
|
Self-insurance reserves. We record estimates for certain health and
welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance costs that are
self-insured programs. These estimates are based on actuarial assumptions and
are subject to change based on actual results. Should the total cost of claims
for health and welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance exceed or
fall short of those anticipated, reserves recorded may not be appropriate, and,
to the extent actual results vary from assumptions, earnings would be impacted. |
|
|
|
|
Pension. The obligations and related assets of defined benefit retirement
plans are included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Companys 2004 Annual Report. Plan assets, which consist primarily of
marketable equity and debt instruments, are valued using market quotations.
Plan obligations and the annual pension expense are determined by independent
actuaries and through the use of a number of assumptions. Key assumptions in
measuring the plan obligations include the discount rate, the rate of salary
increases and the estimated future return on plan assets. In determining the
discount rate, we utilize the yield on fixed-income investments currently
available with maturities corresponding to the anticipated timing of |
-25-
|
|
|
the benefit payments. Salary increase assumptions are based upon historical
experience and anticipated future management actions. Asset returns are based
upon the anticipated average rate of earnings expected on the invested funds of
the plans. At October 29, 2005, the actuarial assumptions of our plans have
remained unchanged from our 2004 Annual Report. To the extent actual results
vary from assumptions, earnings would be impacted. |
|
|
|
|
Customer loyalty program. DSW maintains a customer loyalty program for our
DSW stores in which customers receive a future discount on qualifying
purchases. The Reward Your Style program is designed to promote customer
awareness and loyalty plus provide DSW with the ability to communicate with our
customers and enhance our understanding of their spending trends. While the
program develops customer loyalty, it also provides DSW with valuable market
intelligence and purchasing information regarding its most frequent customers.
Upon reaching the target level, customers may redeem these discounts on a
future purchase. Generally, these future discounts must be redeemed within six
months. We accrue the estimated costs of the anticipated redemptions of the
discount earned at the time of the initial purchase and charge such costs to
selling, general and administrative expense based on historical experience.
The estimates of the costs associated with the loyalty program require us to
make assumptions related to customer purchase levels and redemption rates.
DSWs accrued liability for the customer loyalty program as of October 29, 2005
and January 29, 2005 was $7.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2004, Filenes Basement implemented a limited-time
customer rewards program that ended in December 2004. The rewards program
provided qualifying customers with Filenes Basement gift cards in various
denominations based on their cumulative spending during the program period.
Filenes Basement had an accrued liability related to the rewards program of
$0.8 million at January 29, 2005. These rewards were redeemed in the first
quarter of fiscal 2005, and no liability remains at October 29, 2005. Filenes
Basement utilizes this customer database for direct mail and e-mail marketing
efforts during fiscal 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of Warrants. In accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, the
Company recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. For
derivatives that are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, changes in
the fair values are recognized in earnings in the period of change. For the
three and nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, the Company
did not have any derivatives designated as hedges. During the three months
ended October 29, 2005, the Company recorded income related to a change in the
fair value of the Warrants of $67.0 million. During the nine months ended
October 29, 2005, the Company recorded a charge related to the change in the
fair value of the Warrants of $70.6 million, including a $134.2 |
|
-26-
|
|
|
million charge relating to the initial recording of the Conversion Warrants.
There were no changes in fair value recorded during the three or nine months
ended October 30, 2004 as the Company did not have any derivatives outstanding
during that time period. |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes. We are required to determine the aggregate amount of income
tax expense to accrue and the amount which will be currently payable based upon
tax statutes of each jurisdiction we do business in. In making these
estimates, we adjust income based on a determination of generally accepted
accounting principles for items that are treated differently by the applicable
taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities, as a result of these
differences, are reflected on our balance sheet for temporary differences that
will reverse in subsequent years. A valuation allowance is established against
deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. If our management had made these
determinations on a different basis, our tax expense, assets and liabilities
could be different. During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, we
established an additional valuation reserve of $5.5 million for state net
operating loss carry forwards and wrote-off $5.2 million of deferred tax assets
no longer deductible as a result of changes in state tax regulations in Ohio.
During fiscal 2004, we established an additional valuation reserve for deferred
income tax assets of $3.2 million for carry forwards related to state net
operating losses. |
|
|
|
|
Following the completion of the DSW initial public offering (IPO) in June
2005, DSW is no longer included in the Retail Ventures consolidated federal tax
return. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationships to net
sales of the listed items included in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October, 29 |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 Restated |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 Restated |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
(62.0 |
) |
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
|
|
(61.2 |
) |
|
|
(59.6 |
) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(39.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
Change in fair value of warrants |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
License fees and other income |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
-27-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October, 29 |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 29, 2005 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004
Net Sales. Net sales increased $46.4 million, or 6.6%, from $699.7 million to $746.1 million.
Comparable store sales increased by 1.0% and, by segment, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase |
Value City |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(7.8 |
)% |
DSW |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
Value City net sales decreased $5.5 million to $341.7 million. The sales for comparable stores
decreased 1.0% due to declines in customer traffic. All stores in the segment are in the
comparative stores base. In addition, during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, Value City operated
two fewer stores than in the previous year. These stores had net sales of $2.6 million in the
comparable three month-period ended October 30, 2004. The decrease in comparable sales is comprised
of decreases in mens, childrens and hardlines of 0.6%, 8.5% and 9.3%, respectively. Jewelry, shoes
and ladies sales increased over the comparable period by 7.8%, 6.0% and 6.6%, respectively. During
the comparable quarters, the transaction volume in the Value City segment decreased by 7.3% while
the average unit retail increased 4.3% and the number of units in the basket increased 1.5%.
Additionally, Value City began the elimination of the health and beauty aids and non-gourmet food
categories in July 2005. These categories represent 1.1% and 2.9% of total segment sales in the
three month-periods ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. Throughout the first
quarter of fiscal 2005, Value City began the initial phase to transition a new merchandise strategy
which includes more name brand merchandise and better assortments across all categories. The
transition to this new merchandising strategy was substantially in place relative to this years
goals by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
DSW net sales were $302.2 million, a $39.8 million, or 15.2%, increase over the comparable period
in fiscal 2004. Comparable store sales in the quarter improved 3.5%. The increase in DSW sales
includes a net increase of 30 DSW stores, 7 non-affiliated leased shoe departments and two Filenes
Basement leased shoe departments not including the re-categorization of two DSW/Filenes Basement
combination stores as leased shoe departments which are included in the DSW segment, from October
30, 2004. The DSW store locations and the leased shoe departments that opened subsequent to October
30, 2004 added $23.3 million and $1.5 million,
-28-
respectively. DSW comparable sales in the merchandise categories of womens, athletics and mens had
increases of 5.7%, 1.1% and 0.4%, respectively, and decreased in the accessories category by 9.4%.
Sales increases in the womens category were driven by increases in the seasonal classes, while the
increase in the athletic category was the result of an increase in the womens fashion class. The
decrease in accessories resulted from declines in all classes of accessories. The accessories
category represents 4.6% of total comparable DSW store sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
Filenes Basement net sales increased $12.0 million, or 13.4%, in the quarter to $102.2 million.
Filenes Basement had a net increase of two stores over the prior years period and a comparable
store sales increase of 2.1%. Net sales for the new store that opened in fiscal 2005 added $2.4
million to current year sales while the impact for all stores which opened last year on the fiscal
2005 sales increase was $8.0 million. The merchandise categories of mens, ladies and childrens had
comparable sale increases of 3.5%, 1.2% and 25.5%, respectively. The jewelry category had an
increase of 15.7% driven by watches and costume jewelry classes. Home goods comparable sales
increased 2.8%. The childrens and jewelry categories represent 2.0% and 5.6%, respectively, of
total comparative stores sales.
Gross Profit. Total gross profit increased $3.7 million from $280.0 million to $283.7 million.
Gross profit, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 38.0% compared to 40.0% for the prior years
period. The decrease in the overall margin rate is attributable to the decrease in gross profit
from the Value City and DSW segments, offset in part by increases at the Filenes Basement segment.
Gross profit, as a percent of sales by segment, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
38.9 |
% |
DSW |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
43.5 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
Value Citys gross profit decreased $14.3 million from the comparable period of fiscal 2004. The
decrease is attributable to several factors, including lower initial markups as a result of a
planned shift in strategy toward more name brand merchandise and better assortments at compelling
prices. These new merchandise items have higher initial costs and we have reduced our initial
markups which we believe will improve our sell through. The segment also incurred additional
markdowns within the quarter related to increased point of sales discounts on clearance merchandise
compared to the prior years comparable quarter and deeper initial price reductions on permanent
markdowns.
The DSW gross profit increased $12.4 million to $126.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2005
from $114.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004, and decreased as a percentage of net sales
from 43.5% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to 41.8% in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. This
decrease as a percentage of sales is primarily attributable to increased markdowns caused
-29-
by higher average unit retail price on items in clearance and additional markdowns in our
accessories category. These negative factors were partially offset by an increase in our initial
markups.
Filenes Basement gross profit increased by $5.6 million from the comparable period of fiscal 2004
which is attributable to new stores offset by increased markdowns related to the ready to wear
categories and slow moving spring, domestic and certain imported stock categories. During the
quarter, the initial markup remained comparable to the prior years markup.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses increased $16.4 million from $274.0 million to $290.4 million. Total SG&A expense
associated with new DSW and Filenes Basement stores and new leased shoe departments, excluding
pre-opening costs, not opened as of October 30, 2004, was $9.5 million for the three months ended
October 29, 2005. Pre-opening costs decreased approximately $1.6 million during the three months
ended October 29, 2005, compared with the three months ended October 30, 2004. As a percentage of
sales, SG&A expense was 38.9% compared to 39.2% in the comparable quarter last year.
SG&A expense, as a percent of sales by segment, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
DSW |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
38.9 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
The Value City segments SG&A expense increase as a percentage of sales is primarily the result of
fixed costs primarily in occupancy and salaries not being leveraged against the current period
sales. Value City closed a related party leased warehouse facility and recorded $2.8 million in
expenses associated with the closing. Pre-opening costs decreased in Filenes Basement by
approximately $1.0 million during the three months ended October 29, 2005 compared with the three
months ended October 30, 2004. Total SG&A expense associated with new Filenes Basement stores not
opened as of October 30, 2004, excluding pre-opening costs, was $1.4 million for the three months
ended October 29, 2005.
The DSW segment SG&A expense percentage decreased as a percentage of sales. Included in the DSW
SG&A expenses, excluding pre-opening costs, are costs associated with new DSW stores and new leased
shoe departments not opened as of October 30, 2004 of $7.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively,
for the three months ended October 29, 2005. Pre-opening costs, which are expensed as incurred,
decreased approximately $0.6 million to $3.6 million during the three months ended October 29, 2005
compared with the three months ended October 30, 2004.
Change in Fair Value of Warrants. During the three months ended October 29, 2005, the Company
recorded non-cash income of $67.0 million representing the changes in fair value of
-30-
the Conversion Warrants and Term Loan Warrants. There were no derivative instruments outstanding
for the three months ended October 30, 2004.
License Fees and Other Income. License fees and other income were $1.6 million and $2.0 million
for the three months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. License fees and
other income are comprised of fees from licensees, layaway fees and vending income. These sources
of income can vary based on customer traffic and contractual arrangements.
Operating Profit (Loss). Operating profit for the quarter ended October 29, 2005 was $61.9 million
compared to an operating profit of $8.0 million for the quarter ended October 30, 2004, an increase
of $53.9 million. Operating profit as a percentage of sales was 8.3% and 1.1% for October 29, 2005
and October 30, 2004, respectively.
Operating profit (loss) as a percent of sales by segment in the third quarter was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
DSW |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
Total |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the quarter ended October 29, 2005 decreased $6.7
million to $3.2 million. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease of $253.1 million in average
borrowings during the three months ended October 29, 2005, compared to the three months ended
October 30, 2004, and a decrease of 0.6% in our weighted average borrowing rate.
Income
Taxes. The three months ended October 29, 2005 reflects a tax benefit of $1.8 million or a
negative 3.1% effective tax rate as compared to 32.5% for the three months ended October 30, 2004.
The tax rate of 3.1% reflects the negative impact of the change in fair value on the mark to market
accounting for the Warrants included for book income but not for tax income.
Minority Interest. For the third quarter of fiscal 2005, net income was decreased by $4.0 million
to reflect that portion of the income DSW minority shareholders had recognized on the equity method
of accounting.
Net Income (Loss). For the third quarter of fiscal 2005, net income increased $57.7 million
compared to the third quarter net loss of fiscal 2004 and represents 7.6% versus (0.2)% of net
sales, respectively. The net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 was primarily attributable
to the $67.0 million non-cash change in fair value of the Warrants recorded during the third
quarter of 2005.
-31-
NINE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 29, 2005 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004
Net Sales. Net sales increased $115.2 million, or 5.8%, from $1,977.7 million to $2,092.9 million.
Comparable store sales decreased by 0.9% and, by segment, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase |
Value City |
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
DSW |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
Value City net sales decreased $51.5 million to $954.3 million. The sales for comparable stores
decreased 4.6% due to declines in customer traffic. All stores in the segment are in the
comparative stores base. In addition, during the fiscal 2005 period, Value City operated two fewer
stores than in the previous year. These stores had additional net sales of $6.4 million in the nine
month-period ended October 30, 2004 compared to the nine month-period ended October 29, 2005. The
decrease in comparable sales is comprised of decreases in mens, childrens, hardlines and shoes of
6.7%, 10.3%, 6.9% and 4.8%, respectively. In addition, there were increases in the comparable sales
of ladies and jewelry of 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively. Additionally, Value City began the
elimination of the health and beauty aids and non-gourmet food categories in July 2005. These
categories represent 2.7% and 2.8% of total segment sales in the nine month-periods ended October
29, 2005 and October 30, 2004. During the comparable nine months, the transaction volume in the
Value City segment decreased by 9.5% while the average unit retail increased 1.0% and the number of
units in the basket increased 3.8%. Sales by category have been impacted by the result of the
decreased transaction volume and the reduction of inventory levels on historical clearance sales.
Throughout the first nine months of 2005, Value City began the initial phase to transition a new
merchandise strategy which includes more name brand merchandise and better assortments across all
categories. The transition to this new merchandising strategy was substantially in place relative
to this years goals by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005.
DSW net sales were $860.3 million, a $130.9 million, or 17.9%, increase over the comparable period.
Comparable store sales in the nine months ended October 29, 2005 improved by 3.7%. The increase in
DSW sales includes a net increase of 30 DSW stores, 7 non-affiliated leased shoe departments and
two Filenes Basement leased shoe departments not including the re-categorization of two
DSW/Filenes Basement combination stores as leased shoe departments which are included in the DSW
segment, from October 30, 2004. The DSW store locations and the leased shoe departments that opened
subsequent to October 30, 2004, added $53.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively. DSW comparable
sales increased in the merchandise categories of womens, athletics and mens by 4.2%, 6.8% and 1.8%,
respectively, and decreased in the accessories category by 6.9%. Sales increases in the womens
category was driven primarily by increases in the dress and seasonal classes while the increase in
the mens category was
-32-
primarily driven by increases in the fashion and casual classes. The increase in the athletic
category was primarily the result of the improvement in the fashion class. The decrease in
accessories was the result of declines in all classes of accessories. The accessories category
represented 4.7% of total comparable DSW store sales in the nine-month period.
Filenes Basement net sales increased $35.8 million, or 14.8%, in the nine month-period to $278.3
million. Filenes Basement had a net increase of two stores over the prior years period and a
comparable store sales increase of 1.9%. Net sales for the new store that opened in fiscal 2005
added $6.4 million to current year sales while the impact for all stores which opened last year on
the fiscal 2005 sales increase was an increase of $25.1 million. Merchandise categories of mens,
ladies and childrens had comparable sale increases of 1.5%, 3.2% and 18.8%, respectively. The
jewelry category had an increase of 14.3%. Home goods comparable sales in the segment decreased
0.5%. The childrens and jewelry categories represent 1.9% and 6.0%, respectively, of total
comparative stores sales. The increase in jewelry was the result of increases in all jewelry
classes.
Gross Profit. Total gross profit increased $12.5 million from $799.0 million. Gross profit, as a
percentage of sales, decreased to 38.8% compared to 40.4% for the prior year period. The decrease
in the overall margin rate is attributable to negative comparable margin results for all segments.
Gross profit, as a percent of sales by segment, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
DSW |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
Value Citys gross profit decreased $49.0 million from the comparable period of fiscal 2004. The
decrease is attributable to several factors, including two store closings in the current fiscal
year as compared to fiscal 2004 and lower initial markups as a result of a planned shift in
strategy toward more name brand merchandise and better assortments at compelling prices. These new
merchandise items have higher initial costs and we have reduced our initial markups which we
believe will improve our sell through. The segment also incurred additional markdowns related to
increased point of sales discounts on clearance merchandise compared to the prior years comparable
nine months and deeper initial price reductions on permanent markdowns.
DSWs gross profit increased $50.4 million to $366.5 million in the nine-month period ended October
29, 2005 from $316.1 million in the same nine-month-period of fiscal 2004, and decreased as a
percentage of net sales from 43.3% in the fiscal 2004 nine-month period to 42.6% in the fiscal 2005
nine-month period. This decrease as a percentage of sales is primarily attributable to increased
markdowns in the accessory category and higher average unit retail
-33-
price across all categories. These negative factors were partially offset by an increase in our
initial markups.
Filenes Basements gross profit increased $11.1 million from the comparable period of fiscal 2004.
The increase is attributable to new stores offset by increased markdowns over the prior year
related to Fall clearance merchandise, ready to wear categories and slow moving spring, domestic
and certain imported stock categories. During the nine-month period ended October 29, 2005, the
initial markup remained comparable to the prior years markup.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses increased $57.1 million from $778.2
million to $835.3 million. Total SG&A expense, excluding pre-opening costs, associated with DSW
stores, Filenes Basement stores and leased shoe departments not opened as of October 30, 2004, was
$21.1 million for the nine months ended October 29, 2005. Pre-opening costs decreased approximately
$3.9 million during the nine months ended October 29, 2005 compared to the nine months ended
October 30, 2004. As a percentage of sales, SG&A expense was 39.9% compared to 39.4% in the
comparable nine months last year.
SG&A expense, as a percent of sales by segment, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
DSW |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
The Value City and Filenes Basement SG&A expense increase as a percentage of sales is primarily
the result of occupancy and salaries not being leveraged against the current period sales. Value
City closed two underperforming stores and a warehouse location during the nine months ended
October 29, 2005. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $1.7 million relating to the
operating lease for one of these store locations and an additional $0.2 million for other store
closing costs. The related party leased warehouse facility closing resulted in $2.8 million in
expenses associated with assets written off and the remaining lease buyout. Pre-opening costs,
which are expensed as incurred, decreased in Filenes Basement by approximately $2.3 million during
the nine months ended October 29, 2005, compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2004. Total
SG&A expense associated with new Filenes Basement stores, excluding pre-opening costs of Filenes
Basement stores not opened as of October 30, 2004, was $3.7 million for the nine months ended
October 29, 2005.
The DSW segment SG&A expense increased $43.8 million from $270.0 million in the fiscal 2004
nine-month period to $313.8 million in the fiscal 2005 nine-month period. The decrease in SG&A
expense as a percentage of sales is primarily the result of improved operational efficiencies
achieved through the use of electronic shipping information and increased unit volumes in the
warehouse operations, increased leverage on advertising expenses offset by increases in store
occupancy costs for new stores and leased departments. Included in the
-34-
DSW SG&A expenses, excluding pre-opening costs, are costs associated with new DSW stores and new
leased shoe departments not opened as of October 30, 2004 of $16.6 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, for the nine months ended October 29, 2005. Pre-opening costs, which are expensed as
incurred, decreased approximately $1.5 million during the nine months ended October 29, 2005
compared with the nine months ended October 30, 2004.
During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, the DSW segment accrued an estimated liability
related to the theft of credit card and other purchase information. As of October 29, 2005,
potential exposures for losses related to stolen information were estimated to fall within a range
of approximately $6.5 million to approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors, including
the early development of information regarding the theft and recoverability under insurance
policies, if any, there is no amount in the estimated range that represents a better estimate than
any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, the Company has accrued a charge to operations equal to the low end
of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million.
Change in Fair Value of Warrants. During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, the Company
recorded a charge of $70.6 million for the initial recording and subsequent change in the fair
value of the warrant liability. There were no derivative instruments outstanding during the nine
months ended October 30, 2004.
License Fees and Other Income. License fees and other income were $7.1 million and $5.1 million
for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. License fees and
other income are comprised of fees from licensees, layaway fees and vending income. These sources
of income can vary based on customer traffic and contractual arrangements. As a result of changes
in state tax regulations in the State of Ohio, we have complied with Ohios new Commercial Activity
Tax. We have reflected in the nine months ended October 29, 2005 a $2.2 million benefit.
Operating (Loss) Profit. The operating loss for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 was $87.3
million compared to an operating profit of $25.8 million for the nine months ended October 30,
2004, a decrease of $113.1 million.
Operating (loss) profit as a percent of sales by segment, for the nine months ended October 29,
2005 and October 30, 2004, was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
October 29, 2005 |
|
|
October 30, 2004 |
|
|
Value City |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
DSW |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Filenes Basement |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
|
Total |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 decreased
$5.9 million compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2004 to $23.3 million. The decrease is
due primarily to a decrease of $106.4 million in average borrowings offset in
-35-
part by an increase of 0.7% in the weighted average borrowing rate during the nine months ended
October 29, 2005 compared to the nine months ended October 30, 2004 and the write-off of $2.0
million of unamortized debt issuance costs for the Companys Term Loans and original Revolving
Credit Facility.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 was 1.5% compared
to 26.4% for the nine months ended October 30, 2004. The 2005 tax rate reflects the negative impact
of the non-deductible Warrant amortization, the change in fair value on the mark to market
accounting for the Term Loan Warrants and the Conversion Warrants included for book income but not
for tax income, the write-off of $5.2 million of deferred tax assets no longer deductible as a
result of changes in state tax regulations in Ohio and the increase in the valuation allowance of
$5.5 million during the nine months ended October 29, 2005.
The
negative impacts discussed above were offset by the $10.2 million of tax benefit of stock
option exercises that occurred during the nine months ended October 29, 2005 that are deductible
for tax income but not for book income. The valuation allowance of $5.5 million has been provided
for state net operating loss carry forwards.
Minority Interest. For the nine-month period ended October 29, 2005, net loss was increased by
$3.3 million to reflect the DSW minority shareholders portion of the DSW net income for the period
subsequent to the IPO.
Net Income. For the nine-month period ended October 29, 2005, net loss increased $109.8 million
over the nine-month period ended October 30, 2004 and represents 5.4% versus 0.1% of net sales,
respectively. The net loss for the nine-month period ended October 29, 2005, was primarily
attributable to the $70.6 million non-cash charge related to the initial recording and subsequent
change in fair value of the Warrants.
SEASONALITY
Our business is affected by the pattern of seasonality common to most retail businesses.
Historically, the majority of our sales and operating profit have been generated during the
back-to-school and Christmas selling seasons for our Value City segment and, more recently, our
Filenes Basement segment. DSW net sales have typically been higher in spring and early fall, when
DSWs customers interest in new seasonal styles increases.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys primary ongoing cash requirements are for seasonal and new store inventory purchases
and capital expenditures in connection with expansion, remodeling and information technology
development. The primary sources of funds for these liquidity needs are cash flow from operations
and credit facilities. Working capital and inventory levels typically build throughout the year and
reach the highest level in the fall, peaking during the holiday selling season.
Net
working capital was $272.6 million and $233.6 million at October 29, 2005 and January 29, 2005,
respectively. The increase in net working capital is primarily due to the increased
-36-
inventory levels and cash at October 29,
2005 resulting from the seasonality of the Companys
business and the DSW IPO. The current ratio at October 29, 2005 and January 29, 2005 was 1.5 and
1.6, respectively.
Net cash used in operations was $70.6 million
for the nine months ended October 29, 2005 as
compared to $4.8 million provided by operations for the nine months ended October 30, 2004. The
increase in cash used for operations is primarily due to the net loss in the nine months ended
October 29, 2005 of $112.3 million compared to $2.5 million for the comparable period of the prior
year. The increase in the net loss was partially offset by the
noncash charge of $70.6 million for
the initial recording of and subsequent change in fair value of the Warrants in the nine months
ended October 29, 2005.
Net cash used for capital expenditures was $33.4 million and $56.8 million for the nine months
ended October 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, respectively. The primary decrease in capital
expenditures is due to the decrease in new store openings during the nine-month period ending
October 29, 2005 compared with the nine-month period ending October 30, 2004. In addition to the
capital expenditures during the nine-month period ended October 30, 2004, Retail Ventures acquired
the Leslie Fay tradename for approximately $4.1 million.
During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, capital expenditures, including non-cash additions,
included $9.5 million for new stores, $16.0 million for improvements in existing stores and $11.4
million for information technology equipment upgrades and new systems.
On June 11, 2002, Value City Department Stores, Inc., together with certain other principal
subsidiaries of Retail Ventures, entered into refinancing that consisted of three separate credit
facilities (collectively, the Credit Facilities): (i) a three-year $350 million revolving credit
facility, (ii) two $50 million term loan facilities provided equally by Cerberus Partners, L.P.
(Cerberus) and Schottenstein Stores Corporation (SSC), and (iii) an amended and restated $75
million senior subordinated convertible loan, initially entered into by us on March 15, 2000, which
was held equally by Cerberus and SSC. Prior to their amendment in July 2005 discussed below, these
Credit Facilities were guaranteed by Retail Ventures and substantially all of its subsidiaries.
These Credit Facilities were also subject to an Intercreditor Agreement, which provides for an
established order of payment of obligations from the proceeds of collateral upon default (the
Intercreditor Agreement).
$275 Million Secured Revolving Credit Facility
On July 5, 2005, Retail Ventures and its affiliates amended and restated the $425 million Revolving
Credit Facility which had originally been entered into in June 2002. Pursuant to the July 2005
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit
Facility), (i) DSW was released from its obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) the
lenders released their liens on the shares of DSWs capital stock held by Retail Ventures and the
capital stock of DSWSW held by DSW, and (iii) leasehold mortgages which had been granted by DSW and
DSWSW in 2002 to secure obligations under the June 2002 Revolving Credit Facility were released.
Under the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility, Retail Ventures and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries are named as co-borrowers. This Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility has
borrowing base restrictions and provides
-37-
for borrowings at variable interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the Federal Funds
effective rate, plus a margin. Obligations under the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit
Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of the personal property of Retail Ventures and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries and a pledge of all of Retail Ventures shares of DSW. In addition,
the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility contains usual and customary covenants that,
among other things, restrict Retail Ventures ability to grant liens on its assets, incur
additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash dividends and redeem our stock, enter into
transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. At October 29, 2005,
$109.6 million was available under the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility. Direct
borrowings aggregated $120.0 million at October 29, 2005, while $17.5 million letters of credit
were issued and outstanding. At January 29, 2005, $145.0 million was available under the old $425
million Revolving Credit Facility. Direct borrowings aggregated $140.0 million at January 29, 2005,
while $29.6 million in letters of credit were issued and outstanding for all borrowers including
DSW.
$100 Million Term Loans Related Parties
Until their amendment in July 2005, the Term Loans were comprised of a $50 million Term Loan B and
a $50 million Term Loan C. All obligations under the Term Loans were senior debt and, subject to
the Intercreditor Agreement, had the same rights and privileges as the June 2002 Revolving Credit
Facility and the Convertible Loan. The Company and its principal subsidiaries were obligated on
the Term Loans. During fiscal 2004, the Company extended the maturity dates of the Term Loans by
one year. As a result, the maturity date of the Term Loans was extended to June 11, 2006, under
substantially the same terms and conditions as the then-existing Term Loans.
The Term Loans stated rate of interest per annum depended on whether we elected to pay interest in
cash or a PIK option. During the first two years of the Term Loans, we had the option to pay all
interest in PIK. During the final year of the Term Loans, the stated rate of interest was 15.0% if
paid in cash or 15.5% if PIK and the PIK option was limited to 50% of the interest due. For the
nine months ended October 29, 2005 and for the year ended January 29, 2005, we elected to pay
interest in cash.
The Company issued 2,954,792 Term Loan Warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, at an
initial exercise price of $4.50 per share, to Cerberus and SSC in connection with the Term Loan C.
Prior to their amendment in July 2005, the Term Loan Warrants were exercisable at any time prior to
June 11, 2012. In September 2002, Back Bay Capital Funding LLC (Back Bay) bought from each of
Cerberus and SSC a $3.0 million interest in each of their Term Loans, and received a corresponding
portion of the Term Loan Warrants from each of Cerberus and SSC. We have granted the Term Loan C
lenders registration rights with respect to the shares issuable upon exercise of the Term Loan
Warrants. The $6.1 million value ascribed to the Term Loan Warrants was estimated as of the date of
issuance using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest
rate of 5.6%; expected life of 10 years; expected volatility of
47%; illiquidity discount of 10%; and an expected dividend yield of 0%. The related debt discount was amortized into interest expense
over the life of the debt.
-38-
Amendment to Term Loans
On July 5, 2005, the Company and its affiliates amended the Term Loans which had originally been
entered into in June 2002. Pursuant to the July 2005 Fourth Amendment to Financing Agreement, (i)
DSW was released from its obligations as a co-borrower, (ii) Value City repaid all the Term Loan
indebtedness, and (iii) Retail Ventures agreed to amend the outstanding Term Loan Warrants to
provide SSC, Cerberus and Back Bay the right, from time to time, in whole or in part, to (A)
acquire Retail Ventures common shares at the then current conversion price (subject to the existing
anti-dilution provisions), (B) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A common shares of DSW at an
exercise price per share equal to the price of shares sold to the public in DSWs IPO, or (C)
acquire a combination thereof. Effective November 23, 2005, Back Bay transferred and assigned its
Term Loan Warrants to Millennium Partners, L.P. Although Retail Ventures does not intend or plan
to undertake a spin-off of its DSW common shares to Retail Ventures shareholders, in the event
that Retail Ventures does effect such a spin-off in the future, the holders of outstanding
unexercised Term Loan Warrants will receive the same number of DSW Class A common shares that they
would have received had they exercised their Term Loan Warrants in full for Retail Ventures common
shares immediately prior to the record date of such spin-off, without regard to any limitations on
exercise contained in the Term Loan Warrants. Following the completion of any such spin-off, the
Term Loan Warrants will be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares.
$75 Million Senior Subordinated Convertible Loan Related Parties
In June 2002, we amended and restated our $75 million Convertible Loan dated March 15, 2000. As
amended in 2002, borrowings under the Convertible Loan bore interest at 10% per annum. At our
option, interest could be PIK during the first two years, and thereafter, at our option, up to 50%
of the interest due may be payment-in-kind (PIK) until maturity. PIK interest accrued with respect to the
Convertible Loan was added to the outstanding principal balance, on a quarterly basis, and is
payable in cash upon the maturity of the debt. Prior to its amendment and restatement in July 2005,
the Convertible Loan was guaranteed by all our principal subsidiaries and was secured by a lien on
assets junior to liens granted in favor of the lenders on the Revolving Credit Facility and Term
Loans.
$50 Million Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement
On July 5, 2005, the Company and its affiliates amended and restated the Convertible Loan. Pursuant
to the July 2005 Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement (the Second Amended and
Restated Senior Loan Agreement), (i) DSW was released from its obligations as a co-guarantor, (ii)
Value City repaid $25 million of the Convertible Loan, (iii) the remaining $50 million Convertible
Loan was converted into a non-convertible loan, (iv) the capital stock of DSW held by Retail
Ventures continues to secure the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement, and (v) Retail
Ventures agreed to issue to SSC and Cerberus the Conversion Warrants which will be exercisable from
time to time until the later of June 11, 2007 and the repayment in full of Value Citys obligations
under the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement. Under the Conversion Warrants, SSC
and Cerberus will have the right, from time to time, in whole or in part, to (i) acquire Retail
Ventures common
-39-
shares at the conversion price referred to in the Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan Agreement
(subject to existing anti-dilution provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A common
shares of DSW at an exercise price per share equal to the price of the shares sold to the public in
DSWs IPO (subject to anti-dilution provisions similar to those in the existing Warrants held by
SSC and Cerberus), or (iii) acquire a combination thereof. Although Retail Ventures does not
intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of its DSW common shares to Retail Ventures shareholders,
in the event that Retail Ventures does effect such a spin-off in the future, the holders of
outstanding unexercised Conversion Warrants will receive the same number of DSW common shares that
they would have received had they exercised their Conversion Warrants in full for Retail Ventures
common shares immediately prior to the record date of such spin-off, without regard to any
limitations on exercise contained in the Conversion Warrants. Following the completion of any such
spin-off, the Conversion Warrants will be exercisable solely for Company common shares.
Other Debt Items -DSW IPO, DSW Revolving Credit Facility, and Intercompany Debt.
On July 5, 2005, DSW completed its initial public offering (IPO) and sold to the public 16,171,875 Class A common shares.
Following the IPO, Retail Ventures owns approximately 63.0% of DSWs outstanding common shares and
approximately 93.2% of the combined voting power of such shares.
DSW used a portion of the proceeds from the IPO to repay $190 million of intercompany indebtedness,
and accrued interest of approximately $6.6 million, owed to Retail Ventures. Retail Ventures used
these funds to repay, in part, intercompany indebtedness owed to Value City, and Value City used
such funds to (i) repay the $100 million Term Loans, which bore interest at approximately 15% per
year, (ii) pay down $25 million of the Convertible Loan, which, prior to its amendment and
restatement in July 2005, bore interest at approximately 10% per year, and (iii) pay down a portion
of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company believes the proceeds of the IPO strengthened its
balance sheet and improved debt coverage and will reduce debt service costs.
Simultaneously with the amendment and restatement of Retail Ventures Revolving Credit Facility,
DSW entered into its own new $150 million secured revolving credit facility with a term of five
years. Under this new facility, DSW and its subsidiary, DSWSW, are named as co-borrowers. This
new facility is subject to a borrowing base restriction and provides for borrowings at variable
interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin.
DSWs and DSWSWs obligations under the new secured revolving credit facility are secured by a lien
on substantially all of their personal property and a pledge of all of DSWs shares of DSWSW. At
October 29, 2005, $140.8 million was available under DSWs new secured revolving credit facility.
DSW had no direct borrowings at October 29 2005, while $9.2 million in letters of credit were
issued and outstanding.
In March 2005, DSW declared an intercompany dividend to Retail Ventures of a note in the amount of
$165 million. The indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in March 2020 and
bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 850 basis points per year. DSW pre-paid the note,
together with accrued interest thereon, from net proceeds of the IPO in July 2005.
-40-
In May 2005, DSW declared an additional intercompany dividend to Retail Ventures of a note in the
amount of $25 million. The indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in May 2020
and bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 950 basis points per year. DSW pre-paid the note,
together with accrued interest thereon, from net proceeds of the IPO in July 2005.
Achievement of expected cash flows from operations and compliance with the restrictive covenants of
our Credit Facilities (as discussed in the Note 6 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
our 2004 Annual Report) are dependent upon a number of factors, including the attainment of sales,
gross profit, expense levels, vendor relations, and flow of merchandise that are consistent with
our financial projections. Future limitations of credit availability by factor organizations and/or
vendors will restrict our ability to obtain merchandise and services and may impair operating
results. We believe that cash generated by operations, along with the available proceeds from our
credit agreements and other sources of financing will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to
meet our obligations for working capital, capital expenditures, and debt service. However, there is
no assurance that we will be able to meet our projections. Further, there is no assurance that
extended financing would be available at all, or on terms acceptable to us, if we would fail to
meet our projections.
Contractual Obligations
During the current year, the Company repaid the amount owed on the $100 million Term Loans plus
accrued interest, $25 million of the $75 million Convertible Loan and a portion of the Revolving
Credit Facility with the proceeds of DSWs IPO used to repay intercompany dividends. At October
29, 2005, the Company had outstanding a $50 million Second Amended and Restated Senior Loan and
$120 million direct borrowings against revolving credit facilities.
The Company had outstanding letters of credit that totaled approximately $17.5 million and $9.2
million, respectively, at October 29, 2005 on the Retail Ventures and new DSW secured revolving
credit facilities and $29.6 million at January 29, 2005 on the then-existing Retail Ventures
Revolving Credit Facility. If certain conditions are met under these arrangements, the Company
would be required to satisfy the obligations in cash. Due to the nature of these arrangements and
based on historical experience, the Company does not expect to make any significant payment outside
of the terms set forth in these arrangements.
During the current year, we have continued to enter into various construction commitments,
including capital items to be purchased for projects that were under construction or for which a
lease has been signed. Our obligations under these commitments aggregated approximately $0.7
million at October 29, 2005. In addition, we signed lease agreements for 13 new store locations,
and additional warehouse space for Filenes Basement with annual aggregate rent of $5.3 million and
average terms of approximately 10 years. Associated with the new lease agreements, we will receive
approximately $3.8 million of tenant improvement allowances which will offset future capital
expenditures.
-41-
We operate substantially all our stores, warehouses and corporate office space from leased
facilities. Lease obligations are accounted for either as operating leases or as capital leases.
We disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2004 Annual Report
the minimum payments due under operating or capital leases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
It is not our intention to participate in transactions that generate relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as special purpose entities or variable
interest entities, which would facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other limited purposes.
Retail Ventures had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of October 29, 2005 as that term is
described by the SEC.
Adoption of Accounting Standards
The FASB periodically issues SFAS, some of which require implementation by a date falling within or
after the close of the Companys fiscal year.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No.
123R). This statement revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS No.
123) and requires a fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including
grants of employee stock options and recognition of those expenses in the statements of operations.
SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services and focuses on accounting for transactions
in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. In addition,
SFAS No. 123R will require the recognition of compensation expense over the period during which an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. The effective date of this
statement was originally established to be interim and annual periods beginning after June 15,
2005. In April 2005, however, the SEC delayed the compliance date for SFAS No. 123R until the
beginning of the Companys 2006 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this statement and has not yet determined the method of adoption under SFAS No. 123R and whether
the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the pro forma disclosures required under
SFAS No. 123.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which may adversely affect our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from
interest rate fluctuations, we manage exposures through our regular operating and financing
activities and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do
not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and are not party to any
leveraged financial instruments.
-42-
$425 Million Aggregate Secured Revolving Credit Facilities
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our borrowings under Retail Ventures $275
million Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility and the new DSW $150 million secured
revolving credit facility. At October 29, 2005, direct borrowings aggregated $120.0 million and an
additional $26.7 million of letters of credit were outstanding against these revolving credit
facilities.
A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates on our variable rate debt outstanding for
the nine months ended October 29, 2005, net of income taxes, would have had an approximate $0.5
million impact on our financial position, liquidity and results of operation.
Warrants
For derivatives that are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair values
are recognized in earnings in the period of change. Retail Ventures estimates the fair value of
derivatives based on pricing models using current market rates. During the three and nine months
ended October 29, 2005, the Company recorded mark to market adjustments to the Term Loan Warrants
and the Conversion Warrants of income of $67.0 million and a charge of $70.6 million, including
$134.2 million for the initial recording of the fair value of the Conversion Warrants, respectively.
There were no mark to market adjustments recorded during the three or nine months ended October
30, 2004, as the Company did not have any derivatives outstanding during that time period.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures.
As reported in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 30, 2005,
the Companys management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting related to inadequacies in the controls over the recording of minority interest, retained
earnings and deferred income taxes. Specifically, the Company erroneously calculated and reported
minority interest, retained earnings and deferred income taxes in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet. Based on these facts, and because of the significance of the financial closing and
reporting process to the preparation of reliable financial statements, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these inadequacies in our controls as described in this
paragraph constituted a material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of July 30, 2005.
The Company has put into place controls and implemented policies to ensure the accuracy of
calculations with respect to the accounting for minority interest, retained earnings and deferred
income taxes that support the amounts reflected in our financial statements and to ensure all
significant accounts are properly reconciled on a frequent and timely basis. As a result of these
controls, during the financial closing and reporting process for the third quarter end October 29,
2005, accounting errors were identified that resulted in adjustments to the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheet furnished under Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition of our
September 7, 2005 Form 8-K filed that announced the Companys second quarter fiscal 2005 results
and in the Companys Form 10-Q as originally filed with the SEC on September 13, 2005. The Company
restated the July 30, 2005 Condensed Consolidated financial statements on Form 10-Q/A, as filed
with the SEC on December 8, 2005.
In 2005, in connection with managements assessment of internal
controls pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company
identified a material weakness related to the controls over the accounting for deferred tax balances.
This material weakness had been previously disclosed by the Company in its Form
10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarter ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the SEC on December 8, 2005.
As part of the additional controls and procedures put into place to remediate the material weakness,
management undertook a project to reconcile the deferred tax account balances. At a meeting held on April 5, 2006, management advised the Audit Committee that,
based upon the results of such project, it had made a determination that its deferred tax account
balances required adjustment and that a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting existed as of January 29, 2005.
At the April 5, 2006 meeting, management and the Audit Committee discussed these
issues, and the Audit Committee concurred with managements determination that the
Companys accounting for these items was incorrect and that the
Companys previously
issued audited consolidated financial statements as of January 29, 2005 and January 31,
2004 and for the three years ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003,
and its interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter
and year to date periods ended October 29, 2005, should be restated and should no longer be relied
upon.
On July 31, 2006, our management and audit committee determined to restate our financial statements
for the quarter ended October 29, 2005. The restatement is further discussed in the Introductory
Note in the forepart of this Form 10-Q/A and in Note 15 entitled, Restatement of Financial
Statements to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Management concluded
that the decision to restate its financial statements was due to a change in judgment regarding
certain assumptions used in determining the value assigned to the warrant liability and that the
Companys internal control system originally operated such that managements original estimate of
the warrant liability had a reasonable basis.
In
connection with the restatement referred to above, our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, re-evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report (October 29, 2005). Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of October 29, 2005.
-43-
No other change was made in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over
financial reporting for the quarter ended October 29, 2005.
The errors in deferred tax accounts were identified
as a result of additional controls and procedures put into place during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 to remediate the
material weakness related to deferred tax balances and as a result of this remediation
effort, in the Companys best judgment, it has eliminated the
aforementioned material weakness as of April 11, 2006, which was the
date of the filing of the Companys Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended October 29, 2005 with the SEC.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures announced that it had learned of the theft of credit card and
other purchase information from a portion of DSW customers. On April 18, 2005, Retail Ventures
issued the findings from its investigation into the theft. The theft took place primarily over two
weeks and covered all customers who made purchases at 108 DSW stores, primarily during a
three-month period from mid-November 2004 to mid-February 2005. Transaction information involving
approximately 1.4 million credit cards was obtained. For each card, the stolen information included
credit card or debit card numbers, name and transaction amount. In addition, data from transactions
involving approximately 96,000 checks were stolen. In these cases, checking account numbers and
drivers license numbers were obtained.
-44-
The Company has contacted and is cooperating with law enforcement and other authorities with regard
to this matter. To mitigate potential negative effects on its business and financial performance,
the Company is working with credit card companies and issuers and has contacted as many of its
affected customers as possible. In addition, the Company worked with a leading computer security
firm to minimize the risk of any further data theft. The Company is involved in several legal
proceedings arising out of this incident that, after consultation with counsel, it believes will
not exceed the reserves the Company has currently recorded.
In connection with this matter, the Company entered into a proposed consent order with the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC), which has jurisdiction over consumer protection matters. The FTC
published the proposed order for public comment on December 1, 2005, and copies of the complaint
and consent order are available from the FTCs Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the
FTCs Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
The public comment period expires on January 2, 2006.
The Company has not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts alleged in the FTCs proposed
unfairness complaint are true. Under the consent order as proposed, DSW will pay no fine or
damages. DSW has agreed, however, to maintain a comprehensive information security program, much of
which was put in place shortly after DSW first learned of the theft, and to undergo a biannual
assessment of such program by an independent third party.
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional proceedings or claims brought against
the Company in the future. We have contested and will continue to vigorously contest the claims
made against us and will continue to explore our defenses and possible claims against others.
As of October 29, 2005, the Company estimates that the potential exposure for losses related to
this theft including exposure under currently pending proceedings, ranges from approximately $6.5
million to approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors, including the early development of
information regarding the theft and recoverability under insurance policies, there is no amount in
the estimated range that represents a better estimate than any other amount in the range.
Therefore, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies,
the Company has accrued a charge to operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low
end of the range set forth above. As the situation develops and more information becomes available,
the amount of the reserve may increase or decrease accordingly. The amount of any such change may
be material.
Although difficult to quantify, since the announcement of the theft, the Company has not discerned
any material negative effect on sales trends it believes is attributable to the theft. However,
this may not be indicative of the long-term developments regarding this matter.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(a) |
|
Recent sales of unregistered securities. Not Applicable. |
|
(b) |
|
Use of Proceeds. Not Applicable. |
-45-
(c) |
|
Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchases. |
The following table provides information with respect to purchases Retail Ventures made of its
common shares during the second quarter of the 2005 fiscal year, if any:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as |
|
shares that may |
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
part of publicly |
|
yet be |
|
|
number of |
|
price |
|
announced |
|
purchased |
|
|
shares |
|
paid per |
|
plans or |
|
under plans or |
Period |
|
purchased |
|
share |
|
programs |
|
programs |
July 31, 2005 August 27, 2005 |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
August 28, 2005 October 1, 2005 |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
October 2, 2005 October 29, 2005 |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
Total |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None
Item 5. Other Information.
(a) |
|
As previously disclosed in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 30, 2005, pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of July 5, 2005, by and among the Company and the holders of the Warrants (the
Registration Rights Agreement), each of Cerberus and Back Bay requested that the Company
register for resale pursuant to a Shelf Registration all of the common shares that they may
acquire upon exercise of Warrants. |
|
|
|
On October 14, 2005, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 providing for
the registration for resale by Cerberus and Back Bay of up to 10,407,502 and 264,788,
respectively, of the Companys common shares. |
|
|
|
On November 23, 2005, Back Bay transferred and assigned its Warrants to Millennium Partners,
L.P. |
|
(b) |
|
None. |
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index
to Exhibits on page 48.
-46-
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAIL VENTURES, INC.
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
August 1, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James A. McGrady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. McGrady |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary of Retail Ventures, Inc. |
|
-47-
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
4.1*
|
|
Form of Term Loan Warrant for
Millennium Partners, L.P. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8,
2005.) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Cancellation of Lease Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, by and between
4300 Venture 34910 LLC and Value City Department Stores LLC
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 8, 2005.) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
99*
|
|
Safe Harbor Under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (previously filed as Exhibit
99 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed December
8, 2005.) |
*
Previously filed
-48-