NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.
The Company operates in a single operating segment by selling products to a global network of independent distributors that operates in a seamless manner from market to market, except for its operations in Mainland China. In Mainland China, the Company utilizes an employed sales force, contractual sales promoters and direct sellers to sell its products through fixed retail locations. Selling expenses are the Company's largest expense comprised of the commissions paid to its worldwide independent distributors as well as remuneration to its sales force in Mainland China. The Company manages its business primarily by managing its global sales force. The Company does not use profitability reports on a regional or divisional basis for making business decisions. However, the Company does report revenue in five geographic regions: North Asia, Greater China, South Asia/Pacific, Americas and Europe.
Revenue generated in each of these regions is set forth below (U.S. dollars in thousands):
Revenue generated by each of the Company's three product lines is set forth below (U.S. dollars in thousands):
Additional information as to the Company's operations in its most significant geographic areas is set forth below (U.S. dollars in thousands):
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the Income Taxes topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Codification. These standards establish financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise's activities during the current and preceding years. The Company takes an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. The Company pays income taxes in many foreign jurisdictions based on the profits realized in those jurisdictions, which can be significantly impacted by terms of intercompany transactions between the Company and its foreign affiliates. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are created in this process. As of September 30, 2012 the Company had net deferred tax assets of $49.5 million. The Company nets these deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities by jurisdiction. The Company establishes valuation allowances when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be ultimately realized.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. In 2009, the Company entered into a voluntary program with the United States Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") called Compliance Assurance Process ("CAP"). The objective of CAP is to contemporaneously work with the IRS to achieve federal tax compliance and resolve all or most of the issues prior to filing of the tax return. The Company has elected to participate in the CAP program for 2013 and may elect to continue participating in CAP for future tax years; the Company may withdraw from the program at any time. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a closing agreement with the IRS for all adjustments for the 2005 through 2008 tax years. Due to the Company's participation in the IRS CAP program, the Company is no longer subject to US federal income tax examinations for the years before 2009. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examination by tax authorities for the years before 2005. In major foreign jurisdictions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations for years before 2006. In addition to its participation in CAP, the Company is currently under examination in certain foreign jurisdictions; however, the outcomes of those reviews are not yet determinable.
The Company's unrecognized tax benefits relate to multiple foreign and domestic jurisdictions. Due to potential increases in unrecognized tax benefits from the multiple jurisdictions in which the Company operates, as well as the expiration of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible that the Company's gross unrecognized tax benefits, net of foreign currency adjustments, may change within the next 12 months by a range of approximately $1 to $2 million. The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, due mainly to the expiration of various foreign and U.S. statutes of limitation. This decrease was offset by a decrease in corresponding deferred tax assets of $1.5 million for a net increase in liability of $0.3 million.
The Company is subject to governmental regulations pertaining to product formulation, labeling and packaging, product claims and advertising and to the Company's direct selling system. The Company is also subject to the jurisdiction of numerous foreign tax and customs authorities. Any assertions or determination that either the Company or the Company's distributors is not in compliance with existing statutes, laws, rules or regulations could potentially have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations. In addition, in any country or jurisdiction, the adoption of new statutes, laws, rules or regulations or changes in the interpretation of existing statutes, laws, rules or regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its operations. Although management believes that the Company is in compliance in all material respects with the statutes, laws, rules and regulations of every jurisdiction in which it operates, no assurance can be given that the Company's compliance with applicable statutes, laws, rules and regulations will not be challenged by foreign authorities or that such challenges will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations or cash flows. The Company and its Subsidiaries are defendants in litigation and proceedings involving various matters. Except as noted below, in the opinion of the Company's management, based upon advice of its counsel handling such litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes, if any, will not likely result in a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is subject to regular audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. These audits may result in additional tax liabilities. The Company believes it has appropriately provided for income taxes for all years. Several factors drive the calculation of its tax reserves. Some of these factors include: (i) the expiration of various statutes of limitations; (ii) changes in tax law and regulations; (iii) issuance of tax rulings; and (iv) settlements with tax authorities. Changes in any of these factors may result in adjustments to the Company's reserves, which would impact its reported financial results.
The Company is currently involved in a dispute with customs authorities in Japan with respect to duty assessments on several of the Company's Pharmanex nutritional products, which is separate and distinct from the dispute discussed in Note 12. The dispute relates to additional customs assessments made by Yokohama Customs for the period of October 2006 through September 2009 in connection with post-importation audits, as well as the disputed portion of the Company's import duties from October 2009 to the present, which the Company has or will hold in bond or pay under protest. The aggregate amount of these assessments and disputed duties was approximately 4.3 billion Japanese yen as of September 30, 2012 (approximately $55.4 million), net of any recovery of consumption taxes. Additional assessments related to any prior period would be barred by applicable statutes of limitations. The issue in this case is whether a United States entity utilizing a commissionaire agent in Japan to import its products can use the manufacturer's invoice or must use another valuation method, and, if an alternative method must be used, what the allowable deductions would be in determining the proper valuation. Following the Company's review of the assessments and after consulting with the Company's legal and customs advisors, the Company believes that the additional assessments are improper and are not supported by applicable customs laws. The Company filed letters of protest with Yokohama Customs, which were rejected. The Company then appealed the matter to the Ministry of Finance in Japan. In May 2011, the Company received notice that the Ministry of Finance in Japan denied the Company's administrative appeal. The Company disagrees with the Ministry of Finance's administrative decision. The Company is now pursuing the matter in Tokyo District Court, which the Company believes will provide a more independent determination of the matter. In addition, the Company is currently being required to post a bond or make a deposit equal to the difference between the Company's declared duties and the amount the customs authorities have determined the Company should be paying on all current imports. Because the Company believes that the assessment of higher duties by the customs authorities is an improper application of the regulations, the Company is currently expensing the portion of the duties the Company believes is supported under applicable customs law, and recording the additional deposit or payment as a receivable within long-term assets on its consolidated financial statements. If the Company is unsuccessful in recovering the amounts assessed and paid or held in bond, the Company will likely be required to record a non-cash expense for the full amount of the disputed assessments. The Company anticipates that additional disputed duties will be reduced going forward as the Company now purchases a majority of the affected products in Japan from a Japanese company that purchases and imports the products from the manufacturer.
The Company currently has debt pursuant to various credit facilities and other borrowings. The Company's book value for both the individual and consolidated debt included in the table below approximates fair value. The estimated fair value of the Company's debt is based on interest rates available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The Company has classified these instruments as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The following table summarizes the Company's long-term debt arrangements:
In September 2011, the FASB ratified ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 allows an entity the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of its reporting units. If, based on the qualitative assessment, an entity concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, quantitative testing for impairment is not necessary. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-08, effective January 1, 2012, had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The standard gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired rather than calculating the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. It is effective prospectively for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2012-02 will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 28, 2012, and our other filings, including Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC through the date of this report.
Overview
Our revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 increased 23% and 27% to $526.2 million and $1.6 billion, when compared to the same periods in 2011, with foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacting revenue 3% and 2% for the three- and nine-month periods. This significant growth reflects local-currency growth in each of our regions, with significant growth in our emerging markets, including in Greater China and South Asia/Pacific. Interest in our innovative anti-aging product portfolio and business opportunity continued to drive robust growth in our customer base and sales force, with the number of executive distributors and actives up globally 21% and 10%, year-over-year. Fourth quarter year-over-year comparisons will be negatively impacted by $88.4 million in revenue from limited-time offers in connection with our global convention in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Earnings per share for the third quarter of 2012 were $0.87, compared to $0.72 in the prior year. Earnings per share for the first nine months of 2012 were $2.55 compared to $1.61 in the prior year period, or $1.93 excluding first quarter 2011 non-cash charges of $32.8 million related to a Japan customs ruling. Earnings per share improved due largely to revenue growth coupled with improved operating margins. Earnings per share excluding Japan customs expense is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below.
Revenue
North Asia. The following table sets forth revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for the North Asia region and its principal markets (U.S. dollars in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
$
|
120.7
|
|
|
$
|
121.1
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
346.4
|
|
|
$
|
348.0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
198.2
|
|
|
|
198.8
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
North Asia total
|
|
$
|
184.7
|
|
|
$
|
184.3
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
544.6
|
|
|
$
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
* Less than 1%
Revenue in the region for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 were negatively impacted approximately 2% and 1%, respectively, by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
Local-currency revenue in Japan increased 1% and decreased 2% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same periods in 2011. This growth reflects increased distributor activity in anticipation of the October 2012 introduction of our ageLOC Body Spa and related products through a limited-time offer in Japan. Our executive and active counts in Japan were up 1% and down 4%, respectively, compared to the prior year. The direct selling industry and most direct selling companies have been in decline for a number of years in this challenging market. Substantial regulatory and media scrutiny of the industry continues to negatively impact the industry and our business. As a result of this increased scrutiny, we continue to focus on distributor compliance and education.
South Korea experienced a local-currency revenue increase of 6% and 4% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same periods in 2011. This growth was driven by increased sponsoring and excitement ahead of the introduction of our ageLOC Body Spa and related products through a limited-time offer in October 2012 in South Korea. Our executive distributors in South Korea increased 4% and the number of actives increased 7%, compared to the prior year.
Greater China. The following table sets forth revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for the Greater China region and its principal markets (U.S. dollars in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainland China
|
|
$
|
68.2
|
|
|
$
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
|
$
|
176.4
|
|
|
$
|
111.3
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
101.9
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
142%
|
|
|
|
150.7
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
299%
|
|
Greater China total
|
|
$
|
136.6
|
|
|
$
|
83.4
|
|
|
|
64%
|
|
|
$
|
429.0
|
|
|
$
|
231.4
|
|
|
|
85%
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations did not impact revenue in this region during the three-month period ended September 30, 2012 and positively impacted revenue by approximately 1% in this region during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012. Third-quarter revenue in the region included $20.8 million from limited-time offers in the second quarter.
Significant growth in our revenue and our customer base and sales force in the Greater China region continued to be driven by strong interest in our innovative anti-aging product portfolio and business opportunity. Local-currency revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 in Mainland China was up 60% and 55%, respectively; Taiwan was up 33% and 27%, respectively; and Hong Kong was up 141% and 298%, respectively; compared to the same prior-year periods. Third-quarter revenue in Taiwan and Hong Kong included $7.2 million and $13.6 million, respectively, from limited-time offers in connection with our Greater China regional convention in the second quarter. Mainland China reported a 66% and 64% increase in the number of sales representatives and preferred customers, respectively, compared to the prior-year period. Executive distributors in Taiwan were up 22% and actives increased 13%, compared to the prior year. Executives and actives in Hong Kong were up 39% and 19%, respectively, compared to the prior year.
South Asia/Pacific. The following table sets forth revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for the South Asia/Pacific region (U.S. dollars in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Asia/Pacific
|
|
$
|
91.1
|
|
|
$
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
$
|
266.8
|
|
|
$
|
171.0
|
|
|
|
56%
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in South Asia/Pacific negatively impacted revenue 5% and 4% in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same prior-year period.
Significant revenue growth was driven by successful limited-time offers of our ageLOC R2 and ageLOC Body Spa and related products in connection with a series of regional events. These limited-time offers generated $22.0 million in revenue during the third quarter. Third-quarter revenue in the region also included $7.3 million from limited-time offers in the second quarter of 2012. Executive distributors in the region increased 22% over the prior year, while actives increased 14%. In the third quarter we began operations in Vietnam. Following significant growth in this region over the past several years, and given the dynamics of limited-time offers that generally spike revenue growth, we expect the growth in this region to contract in the fourth quarter.
Americas. The following table sets forth revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for the Americas region (U.S. dollars in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
|
$
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
$
|
208.6
|
|
|
$
|
175.1
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
Revenue in the Americas region for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 increased by 19%, compared to the prior-year period. This growth reflects continued executive distributor growth and strong interest in our product portfolio, including our ageLOC and LifePak products. Our executive count in this region increased 14% and actives remained level when compared to the prior-year periods. In October 2012, we successfully introduced our new ageLOC Tru Face Essence Ultra in the Americas through a limited-time offering.
As previously disclosed, the United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") has refused admission of shipments of our Galvanic Spa facial units because the FDA believes it may require clearance as a medical device. While we disagree with the FDA's position, we have elected to suspend further imports of Galvanic Spa facial units. In September 2012, we filed an application for clearance of an alternative facial spa unit as a low-level medical device. We currently anticipate that this process could take six to nine months or longer. Sales of our Galvanic Spa facial units in the United States have accounted for approximately 4% of our revenue in the Americas region and less than 1% of our revenue globally in 2012. For more information regarding this matter, see "Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" below.
Europe. The following table sets forth revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 for the Europe region (U.S. dollars in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
43.2
|
|
|
$
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
$
|
132.4
|
|
|
$
|
124.4
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the Europe region negatively impacted revenue approximately 14% and 11% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012. Growth in this region was driven by strong sales force growth, with executives and actives in the region up 23% and 12%, respectively, compared to the prior year. In October 2012, we successfully introduced our ageLOC R2 in the majority of our markets in the region through a limited-time offering.
Gross profit
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 83.5% for the third quarter of 2012, level with the third quarter of 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 83.7% and 80.6% for the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Excluding a $32.8 million first quarter 2011 non-cash charge related to a Japan customs ruling, gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the first nine months of 2011 was 83.2%. Gross profit excluding Japan customs expense is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below. The improvement in gross profit reflects continued supply chain improvements.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 44.8% and 44.6% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 from 43.0% for the same periods in 2011. The increase is due to three primary factors: a higher commission percentage associated with sales leaders achieving larger monthly volumes during our product launches, growth in our sales force which leads to a higher number of sales leaders achieving sales incentive trips, and expenses associated with achievement of special incentive targets in Greater China and South Asia.
General and administrative expenses
As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expenses decreased to 23.1% for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 from 24.8% and 24.9% for the same periods in 2011. This decrease is due primarily to our significant revenue growth increasing at a faster rate than our general and administrative expenses.
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 was $1.2 million and $1.5 million of income compared to $6.9 million and $7.4 million of expense for the same periods in 2011. This was largely due to reduced foreign currency losses from the translation of our intercompany balances into U.S. dollars at the end of the quarter.
Provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 was $29.4 million and $91.0 million compared to $13.5 million and $46.9 million for the same periods in 2011. The effective tax rate was 35.2% and 35.9% of pre-tax income during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, compared to 22.4% and 31.1% in the same prior-year periods. The income tax benefit in the third quarter of 2011 was primarily attributable to a one-time discrete tax benefit of $7.7 million associated with the effective settlement of an IRS audit for tax years 2005 – 2008. During the third quarter of 2011 we entered into a closing agreement with the IRS on the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion for the exportation of products outside the United States.
Net income
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income for the third quarter of 2012 was $54.2 million compared to $46.8 million for the same period in 2011. Net income for the first nine months of 2012 was $162.4 million compared to $103.8 million, or $124.3 million excluding $32.8 million ($20.5 million, net of tax) in Japan customs expense, for the same period in 2011. Net income excluding Japan customs expense is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our principal uses of cash have included operating expenses, particularly selling expenses, and working capital (principally inventory purchases), as well as capital expenditures, stock repurchases, dividends, debt repayment and the development of operations in new markets. We have generally relied on cash flow from operations to fund operating activities, and we have at times incurred long-term debt in order to fund strategic transactions and stock repurchases.
We typically generate positive cash flow from operations due to favorable gross margins and the variable nature of selling expenses, which constitute a significant percentage of operating expenses. We generated $239.3 million in cash from operations during the first nine months of 2012, compared to $127.4 million during the same period in 2011. This increase is attributed to significant revenue growth and a related increase in accrued expenses.
As of September 30, 2012, working capital was $304.5 million, compared to $288.9 million as of December 31, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents, including current investments at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $337.7 million and $290.7 million, respectively. The increase in working capital was primarily due to strong cash flows from operations offset by payments for property, plant and equipment, dividends and net transactions related to our stock.
Capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2012 totaled $64.5 million, and we anticipate additional capital expenditures of approximately $35 million for the remainder of 2012. We currently anticipate capital expenditures of $150 million in 2013. These capital expenditures are primarily related to:
• |
planning and construction of a new innovation center on our Provo campus and a new Greater China regional headquarters in Shanghai, China, and related real
estate acquisitions;
|
• |
the build-out and upgrade of leasehold improvements in our various markets, including retail stores in Mainland China; and |
• |
purchases of computer systems and software, including equipment and development costs. |
We currently have debt pursuant to various credit facilities and other borrowings. Our book value for both the individual and consolidated debt included in the table below approximates fair value. The estimated fair value of our debt is based on interest rates available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. We have classified these instruments as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The following table summarizes our long-term debt arrangements:
Facility or Arrangement
|
|
Original Principal Amount
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2012(1)
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Repayment terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-currency uncommitted shelf facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar denominated:
|
|
$40.0 million
|
|
$22.9 million
|
|
6.2%
|
|
Notes due July 2016 with annual principal payments that began in July 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million
|
|
$14.3 million
|
|
6.2%
|
|
Notes due January 2017 with annual principal payments that began in January 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen
denominated:
|
|
3.1 billion yen
|
|
0.9 billion yen ($11.4 million as of September 30, 2012)
|
|
1.7%
|
|
Notes due April 2014 with annual principal payments that began in April 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 billion yen
|
|
1.6 billion yen ($20.8 million as of September 30, 2012)
|
|
2.6%
|
|
Notes due September 2017 with annual principal payments that began in September 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 billion yen
|
|
1.5 billion yen ($19.9 million as of September 30, 2012)
|
|
3.3%
|
|
Notes due January 2017 with annual principal payments that began in January 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 billion yen
|
|
8.0 billion yen ($102.4 million as of September 30, 2012)
|
|
1.7%
|
|
Notes due May 2022 with annual principal payments that begin in May 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed loan:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar denominated:
|
|
$30.0 million
|
|
$20.0 million
|
|
Variable 30 day: 1.24%
|
|
Amortizes at $0.5 million every 30 days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
N/A
|
|
None
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
(1) The current portion of our long-term debt (i.e. becoming due in the next 12 months) includes $13.8 million of the balance of our Japanese yen-denominated debt under the multi-currency uncommitted shelf facility, $8.6 million of the balance on our U.S. dollar denominated debt under the multi-currency uncommitted shelf facility and $6.5 million of our 2010 committed loan.
(2) The committed loan is secured by deeds of trust with respect to our corporate headquarters and distribution center in Provo, Utah.
Our board of directors has approved a stock repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase our outstanding shares of Class A common stock on the open market or in private transactions. The repurchases are used primarily to offset dilution from our equity incentive plans and for strategic initiatives. During the first nine months of 2012, we repurchased 4.1 million shares of Class A common stock under this program for $179.6 million. At September 30, 2012, $157.2 million was available for repurchases under the stock repurchase program.
In January, May and July 2012, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share. This quarterly cash dividend totaling $12.5 million, $12.3 million and $11.9 million was paid on March 14, 2012, June 13, 2012 and September 12, 2012, to stockholders of record on February 24, 2012, May 25, 2012 and August 24, 2012, respectively. In October 2012, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per share to be paid December 5, 2012 to stockholders of record on November 14, 2012. Currently, we anticipate that our board of directors will continue to declare quarterly cash dividends and that the cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our future dividend payments. However, the continued declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including our net earnings, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
We believe we have sufficient liquidity to be able to meet our obligations on both a short- and long-term basis. We currently believe that existing cash balances of $321.9 million (approximately $101.5 million maintained in bank accounts based in the United States), future cash flows from operations and existing lines of credit will be adequate to fund our cash needs on both a short- and long-term basis. The majority of our historical expenses have been variable in nature and as such, a potential reduction in the level of revenue would reduce our cash flow needs. In the event that our current cash balances, future cash flow from operations and current lines of credit are not sufficient to meet our obligations or strategic needs, we would consider raising additional funds in the debt or equity markets or restructuring our current debt obligations. Additionally, we would consider realigning our strategic plans, including a reduction in capital spending, stock repurchases or dividend payments.
Contingent Liabilities
We are currently involved in a dispute with customs authorities in Japan with respect to duty assessments on several of our Pharmanex nutritional products, which is separate and distinct from the dispute referred to above under Gross Profit. The dispute relates to additional customs assessments made by Yokohama Customs for the period of October 2006 through September 2009 in connection with post-importation audits, as well as the disputed portion of our import duties from October 2009 to the present, which we have or will hold in bond or pay under protest. The aggregate amount of these assessments and disputed duties was approximately 4.3 billion Japanese yen as of September 30, 2012 (approximately $55.4 million), net of any recovery of consumption taxes. Additional assessments related to any prior period would be barred by applicable statutes of limitations. The issue in this case is whether a United States entity utilizing a commissionaire agent in Japan to import its products can use the manufacturer's invoice or must use another valuation method, and, if an alternative method must be used, what the allowable deductions would be in determining the proper valuation. Following our review of the assessments and after consulting with our legal and customs advisors, we believe that the additional assessments are improper and are not supported by applicable customs laws. We filed letters of protest with Yokohama Customs, which were rejected. We then appealed the matter to the Ministry of Finance in Japan. In May 2011, we received notice that the Ministry of Finance in Japan denied our administrative appeal. We disagree with the Ministry of Finance's administrative decision. We are now pursuing the matter in Tokyo District Court, which we believe will provide a more independent determination of the matter. In addition, we are currently being required to post a bond or make a deposit equal to the difference between our declared duties and the amount the customs authorities have determined we should be paying on all current imports. Because we believe that the assessment of higher duties by the customs authorities is an improper application of the regulations, we are currently expensing the portion of the duties we believe is supported under applicable customs law, and recording the additional deposit or payment as a receivable within long-term assets on our consolidated financial statements. To the extent that we are unsuccessful in recovering the amounts assessed and paid or held in bond, we will likely record a non-cash expense for the full amount of the disputed assessments. We anticipate that additional disputed duties will be reduced going forward as we now purchase a majority of the affected products in Japan from a Japanese company that purchases and imports the products from the manufacturer.
Critical Accounting Policies
The following critical accounting policies and estimates should be read in conjunction with our critical accounting policies section of our Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2012. Management considers our critical accounting policies to be the recognition of revenue, accounting for income taxes, accounting for intangible assets and accounting for stock-based compensation. In each of these areas, management makes estimates based on historical results, current trends and future projections.
Revenue. We recognize revenue when products are shipped, which is when title and risk of loss pass to our independent distributors and preferred customers who are our customers. With some exceptions in various countries, we offer a return policy whereby distributors can return unopened and unused product generally for up to 12 months subject to a 10% restocking fee. Reported revenue is net of returns, which have historically been less than 5% of annual revenue. A reserve for product returns is accrued based on historical experience. We classify selling discounts as a reduction of revenue. Our selling expenses are computed pursuant to our global compensation plan for our distributors, which is focused on remunerating distributors based primarily upon their selling efforts and the productivity of their sales networks, and not their personal purchases.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with the Income Taxes topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Codification. These standards establish financial accounting and reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise's activities during the current and preceding years. We take an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. We pay income taxes in many foreign jurisdictions based on the profits realized in those jurisdictions, which can be significantly impacted by terms of intercompany transactions among our affiliates around the world. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are created in this process. As of September 30, 2012, we had net deferred tax assets of $49.5 million. These net deferred tax assets assume sufficient future earnings will exist for their realization, as well as the continued application of current tax rates. In certain foreign jurisdictions valuation allowances have been recorded against the deferred tax assets specifically related to use of net operating losses. When we determine that there is sufficient taxable income to utilize the net operating losses, the valuation allowances will be released. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period such determination was made.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. In 2009, we entered into a voluntary program with the United States Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") called Compliance Assurance Process ("CAP"). The objective of CAP is to contemporaneously work with the IRS to achieve federal tax compliance and resolve all or most of the issues prior to filing of the tax return. We have elected to participate in the CAP program for 2013 and may elect to continue participating in CAP for future tax years; we may withdraw from the program at any time. During the third quarter of 2011, we entered into a closing agreement with the IRS for all adjustments for the 2005 through 2008 tax years. Due to our participation in the IRS CAP program, we are no longer subject to US federal income tax examinations for the years before 2009. With a few exceptions, we are no longer subject to state and local income tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2005. In major foreign jurisdictions, we are no longer subject to income tax examinations for years before 2006. Along with the IRS examination, we are currently under examination in certain foreign jurisdictions; however, the outcomes of those reviews are not yet determinable.
We are subject to regular audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. These audits may result in additional tax liabilities. We account for such contingent liabilities in accordance with relevant accounting standards and believe we have appropriately provided for income taxes for all years. Several factors drive the calculation of our tax reserves. Some of these factors include: (i) the expiration of various statutes of limitations; (ii) changes in tax law and regulations; (iii) issuance of tax rulings; and (iv) settlements with tax authorities. Changes in any of these factors may result in adjustments to our reserves, which would impact our reported financial results.
Intangible Assets. Acquired intangible assets may represent indefinite-lived assets, determinable-lived intangibles, or goodwill. Of these, only the costs of determinable-lived intangibles are amortized to expense over their estimated life. The value of indefinite-lived intangible assets and residual goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least annually for impairment. Our impairment testing for goodwill is performed separately from our impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles. We test goodwill for impairment, at least annually, by reviewing the book value compared to the fair value at the reportable unit level. We test individual indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually by reviewing the individual book values compared to the fair value. Considerable management judgment is necessary to measure fair value. We did not recognize any impairment charges for goodwill or intangible assets during the periods presented.
Stock-Based Compensation. All share-based payments to employees are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values using an option-pricing model at the date of grant. We use a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of options. Stock based compensation expense is recognized net of any estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.
Seasonality and Cyclicality
In addition to general economic factors, we are impacted by seasonal factors and trends such as major cultural events and vacation patterns. For example, most Asian markets celebrate their respective local New Year in the first quarter, which generally has a negative impact on that quarter. We believe that direct selling in Japan, the United States and Europe is also generally negatively impacted during the third quarter, when many individuals, including our distributors, traditionally take vacations.
We have experienced rapid revenue growth in certain new markets following commencement of operations. This initial rapid growth has often been followed by a short period of stable or declining revenue, followed by renewed growth fueled by product introductions and an increase in the size and productivity of our customer base and sales force. The contraction following initial rapid growth has been more pronounced in certain new markets, due to other factors such as business or economic conditions or distributor distractions outside the market.
Distributor Information
The following table provides information concerning the number of actives and executive distributors in each of our regions as of the dates indicated. "Actives" include our independent distributors and preferred and retail customers who have purchased products directly from us for resale or personal consumption during the previous three months ended as of the date indicated. "Executives" include our independent distributors, who have completed and maintain certain qualification requirements, and our qualified sales employees and contractual sales promoters in Mainland China.
|
|
As of September 30, 2012
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011
|
|
Region:
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Asia
|
|
|
336,000
|
|
|
|
15,603
|
|
|
|
333,000
|
|
|
|
15,303
|
|
Greater China
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
10,801
|
|
South Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
4,809
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
5,831
|
|
|
|
166,000
|
|
|
|
5,106
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
118,000
|
|
|
|
4,581
|
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
Total
|
|
|
913,000
|
|
|
|
48,164
|
|
|
|
833,000
|
|
|
|
39,751
|
|
Currency Risk and Exchange Rate Information
A majority of our revenue and many of our expenses are recognized outside of the United States, except for inventory purchases, which are primarily transacted in U.S. dollars from vendors in the United States. The local currency of each of our subsidiaries' primary markets is considered the functional currency. All revenue and expenses are translated at weighted-average exchange rates for the periods reported. Therefore, our reported revenue and earnings will be positively impacted by a weakening of the U.S. dollar and will be negatively impacted by a strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Given the large portion of our business derived from Japan, South Korea and Mainland China, any weakening of these currencies negatively impacts reported revenue and profits, whereas a strengthening of these currencies positively impacts our reported revenue and profits. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate fluctuations, it is difficult to predict the effect of these fluctuations on our future business, product pricing and results of operation or financial condition. However, based on current exchange rate levels, we currently anticipate that foreign currency fluctuations will have a modest negative impact on reported revenue in 2012.
We may seek to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of foreign currency exchange contracts, through intercompany loans of foreign currency and through our Japanese yen-denominated debt. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We regularly monitor our foreign currency risks and periodically take measures to reduce the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on our operating results. At September 30, 2012 and 2011, we held forward contracts designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges with notional amounts totaling approximately 3.2 billion Japanese yen ($41.1 million as of September 30, 2012) and approximately 8.2 billion Japanese yen ($106.4 million as of September 30, 2011), respectively. In addition, we held forward foreign exchange contracts in the amounts of 4.8 million Canadian dollars ($4.4 million as of September 30, 2012), 27.0 million Thailand baht ($0.9 million as of September 30, 2012) and 46.6 million South African rand ($5.6 million as of September 30, 2012) as fair value hedges and not designated for hedge accounting to hedge risks associated with foreign-currency-denominated intercompany transactions. Because of our foreign exchange contracts at September 30, 2012, the impact of a 10% appreciation or 10% depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese yen would not represent a material potential gain or loss in fair value, earnings or cash flows against these contracts.
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any plans regarding dividend payments, product introductions or capital expenditures, any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Forward-looking statements may include the words "may," "will," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "continue," "believe," "expect" or "anticipate" and any other similar words.
We wish to caution readers that although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in our forward-looking statements. We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, except as required by law. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and to inherent risks and uncertainties, such as those disclosed or incorporated by reference in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in our forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
(a) Global economic conditions continue to be challenging. It is not possible for us to predict the extent and timing of any improvement in global economic conditions. Even with continued growth in many of our markets during this period, the economic downturn could adversely impact our business in the future by causing a decline in demand for our products, particularly if the economic conditions are prolonged or worsen. In addition, such economic conditions may adversely impact access to capital for us and our suppliers, may decrease our distributors' ability to obtain or maintain credit cards, and may otherwise adversely impact our operations and overall financial condition.
(b) Due to the international nature of our business, we are exposed to the fluctuations of numerous currencies. We purchase inventory primarily in U.S. dollars. In preparing our financial statements, we translate revenue and expenses in our markets outside the United States from their local currencies into U.S. dollars using weighted average exchange rates. Our results could be negatively impacted if the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to these currencies. In addition, our business may be negatively impacted by inflation, currency exchange restrictions, pricing controls and currency devaluation, especially in countries such as Venezuela.
(c) Our ability to retain key and executive level distributors or to sponsor new executive distributors is critical to our success. Because our products are distributed exclusively through our distributors and we compete with other direct selling companies in attracting distributors, our operating results could be adversely affected if our existing and new business opportunities and incentives, products, business tools and other initiatives do not generate sufficient enthusiasm and economic incentive to retain our existing distributors or to sponsor new distributors on a sustained basis. In addition, in our more mature markets, one of the challenges we face is keeping distributor leaders with established businesses and high income levels motivated and actively engaged in business building activities and in developing new distributor leaders. There can be no assurance that our initiatives will continue to generate excitement among our distributors in the long-term or that planned initiatives will be successful in maintaining distributor activity and productivity or in motivating distributor leaders to remain engaged in business building and developing new distributor leaders. If our initiatives do not drive growth in our distributor numbers our operating results could be harmed.
(d) We have experienced revenue declines in Japan over the last several years and continue to face challenges in this market. If we are unable to stabilize revenue or renew growth in this market, our results could be harmed. Factors that could impact our results in the market include:
·
|
continued or increased levels of regulatory and media scrutiny and any regulatory actions taken by regulators, or any adoption of more restrictive regulations, in response to such scrutiny;
|
·
|
significant weakening of the Japanese yen;
|
·
|
increased regulatory constraints with respect to the claims we can make regarding the efficacy of products and tools, which could limit our ability to effectively market them;
|
·
|
inappropriate activities by our distributors and any resulting regulatory actions;
|
·
|
improper practices of other direct selling companies or their distributors that increase regulatory and media scrutiny of our industry;
|
·
|
increased weakness in the economy or consumer confidence; and
|
·
|
increased competitive pressures from other direct selling companies and their distributors who actively seek to solicit our distributors to join their businesses.
|
(e) Distributor activities that violate applicable laws or regulations could result in government or third party actions against us. We continue to experience general inquiries and complaints regarding distributor activities to consumer centers in Japan. Over the last few years, we have received warnings from consumer centers in certain prefectures raising concerns about the number of general inquiries and complaints regarding our Company. Although we are implementing additional steps to reinforce our distributor compliance, education and training efforts in Japan, we cannot be sure that such efforts will be successful. If the current level of inquiries or complaints does not continue to improve, there is an increased likelihood that the government could take action against us, including sanctions and or suspensions, or we could receive negative media attention, all of which could harm our business.
(f) If direct selling regulations in Mainland China are modified, interpreted or enforced in a manner that results in negative changes to our business model or the imposition of a range of potential penalties, our business could be harmed. The nature of the political, regulatory and legal systems in Mainland China gives regulatory agencies at both the local and central levels of government broad discretion to interpret and enforce regulations in a fashion that promotes social order. If our business practices are found to be in violation of applicable regulations as they may be interpreted or enforced in the future, in particular our use of the sales productivity of a sales leader and the contractual sales promoters and sales employees he/she leads and supervises in setting his/her quarterly compensation level, then we could be forced to change our business model and/or sanctioned, either of which could significantly harm our business.
(g) Our operations in Mainland China are subject to significant government scrutiny, and we could be subject to fines or other penalties if our sales employees, contractual sales promoters or direct sellers engage in activities that violate applicable laws and regulations. The legal system in Mainland China provides governmental authorities with broad latitude to conduct investigations. We anticipate that our business will continue to attract significant governmental scrutiny, particularly as our business grows and the number of sales employees and contractual sales promoters continues to increase. While we have been able to resolve past investigations and have only been required to pay fines in a limited number of instances, all between 2002 and 2007, we face a risk that future investigations may result in fines or other more significant sanctions. In addition, if we are unable to obtain additional necessary national and local government approvals in Mainland China our ability to expand our business could be negatively impacted.
(h) There have been a series of third party actions and governmental actions involving some of our competitors in the direct selling industry. These actions have generated negative publicity for the industry and likely have resulted in increased regulatory scrutiny of other companies in the industry. Adverse rulings in any of these cases could harm our business if they create adverse publicity or interpret laws in a manner inconsistent with our current business practices.
(i) The network marketing, nutritional supplement and personal care industries are subject to various laws and regulations throughout our markets, many of which involve a high level of subjectivity and are inherently fact-based and subject to interpretation. In addition, negative publicity concerning supplements with controversial ingredients has spurred efforts to change existing regulations or adopt new regulations in order to impose further restrictions and regulatory control over the nutritional supplement industry. If our existing business practices or products, or any new initiatives or products, are challenged or found to contravene any of these laws by any governmental agency or other third party, or if there are any new regulations applicable to our business that limit our ability to market such products or impose additional requirements on us, our revenue and profitability may be harmed. For example, the FDA recently issued warning letters to several cosmetic companies alleging improper structure/function claims regarding their cosmetic products, including, for example, product claims regarding gene activity, cellular rejuvenation, and rebuilding collagen. In addition, plaintiffs' lawyers have filed class action lawsuits against some of our competitors following the warning letters. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to similar governmental actions or class action lawsuits, which could harm our business.
(j) While we have not been required to register our Galvanic Spa System and Pharmanex BioPhotonic Scanner as medical devices in most of our markets, we were required to register our Galvanic Spa System as a medical device in Indonesia, Thailand and Colombia. We are also currently in the process of registering our Galvanic Spa System as a medical device in Taiwan. As previously disclosed, the FDA has refused admission of shipments of our Galvanic Spa facial units because the FDA believes it may require clearance as a medical device. While we disagree with the FDA's position, we have elected to suspend further imports of Galvanic Spa facial units. In September 2012, we filed an application for clearance of an alternative facial spa unit as a low-level medical device. We currently anticipate that this process could take six to nine months or longer. There can be no assurance we will not face challenges or delays, or that we will be able to make any required modifications or provide documentation necessary to obtain clearance. If we cease selling existing inventory or do not have sufficient inventory to sell while we work through these issues with the FDA, our results in the United States could be negatively impacted.
(k) Production difficulties and quality control problems could harm our business, in particular our reliance on third party suppliers to deliver quality products in a timely manner. Occasionally, we have experienced production difficulties with respect to our products, including the delivery of products that do not meet our quality control standards. These quality problems have resulted in the past, and could result in the future, in stock outages or shortages in our markets with respect to such products, harming our sales and creating inventory write-offs for unusable products. In addition, if we are not able to accurately forecast sales levels on a market by market basis, or are unable to produce a sufficient supply to meet such demand globally, we could have stockouts which could negatively impact enthusiasm of our distributors.
(l) Historically, most of our products have been imported from the United States into the countries in which they are ultimately sold. These countries impose various legal restrictions on imports and typically impose duties on our products. We may be subject to prospective or retrospective increases in duties on our products imported into our markets outside of the United States, which could adversely impact our results. As discussed above under the heading "Contingent Liabilities," we are currently appealing certain assessments of duties in Japan. In addition, we are currently required to post a bond or make a deposit for duties in excess of what we believe are supported by applicable customs law, and we record the additional deposit or payment as a receivable within long-term assets on our consolidated financial statements. If we are unsuccessful in recovering the amounts assessed and paid or held in bond, we will likely record a non-cash expense for the full amount of the disputed assessments.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Regulation G, Conditions for Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures, and other SEC regulations define and prescribe the conditions for use of certain non-GAAP financial information. Our measures of earnings per share, gross profit and net income, each excluding the Japan customs expense, meet the definition of non-GAAP financial measures. Earnings per share, gross profit and net income, each excluding the Japan customs expense, are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP and should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures.
Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures assist management and investors in evaluating, and comparing from period to period, results from ongoing operations in a more meaningful and consistent manner while also highlighting more meaningful trends in the results of operations.
The following is a reconciliation of gross profit, as reported, to gross profit excluding Japan customs expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,581,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,248,687
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
1,323,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,006,234
|
|
Japan customs expense
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
32,754
|
|
Gross profit, excluding Japan customs expense
|
|
$
|
1,323,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,038,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, excluding Japan customs expense, as a % of revenue
|
|
|
83.7%
|
|
|
|
83.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a % of revenue
|
|
|
83.7%
|
|
|
|
80.6%
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of net income and diluted earnings per share, as reported, to net income and diluted earnings per share excluding Japan customs expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
162,412
|
|
|
$
|
103,807
|
|
Japan customs expense
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
32,754
|
|
Tax effect of Japan customs expense
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(12,275
|
)
|
Net income, excluding Japan customs expense
|
|
$
|
162,412
|
|
|
$
|
124,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share, excluding Japan customs expense
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by Item 3 of Part I of Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Currency Risk and Exchange Rate Information" in "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" of Part I and also in Note 4 to the Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
No updates to report. Please refer to our recent SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2011 fiscal year, for information regarding the status of certain legal proceedings that have been previously disclosed.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The information presented below supplements and should be read in conjunction with the detailed discussion of risks associated with our business in our recent SEC filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2011 fiscal year.
If our Pharmanex BioPhotonic Scanner or Galvanic Spa Systems, including our recently launched Body Spa are determined to be a medical device in a particular geographic market or if our distributors use these tools for medical purposes or make improper medical claims, our ability to continue to market and distribute such tools could be harmed.
One of our strategies is to market unique and innovative products and tools that allow our distributors to distinguish our products, including the Galvanic Spa System and the Pharmanex BioPhotonic Scanner. Any determination by regulatory authorities in our markets that these products must be registered as medical devices could restrict our ability to import or sell the product in such market until registration is obtained. While we have not been required to register these products as medical devices in most of our markets, we were required to register our Galvanic Spa System as a medical device in Indonesia, Thailand and Colombia. We are also currently in the process of registering our Galvanic Spa System as a medical device in Taiwan. There have been legislative proposals in Singapore and Malaysia relating to the regulation of medical devices that could affect the way we market the Galvanic Spa System and the Pharmanex BioPhotonic Scanner in these countries.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") recently refused admission of shipments of our Galvanic Spa facial units because the FDA believes it may require clearance as a medical device. While we disagree with the FDA's position, we have elected to suspend further imports of Galvanic Spa facial units. In September 2012, we filed an application for clearance of an alternative facial spa unit as a low-level medical device. We currently anticipate that this process could take six to nine months or longer. If we face delays or challenges in getting clearance or resolving the matter with the FDA, or if we cease selling existing inventory or do not have sufficient inventory to sell while we work through these issues with the FDA, our results in the United States could be negatively impacted. In addition, if our distributors are making medical claims regarding our products or are using our products to perform medical diagnoses or other activities limited to licensed professionals or approved medical devices, it could negatively impact our ability to market or sell such products.
Where necessary, obtaining medical device registrations and clearances could require us to provide documentation concerning product manufacturing and clinical utility, to make design, specification and manufacturing process modifications to meet standards imposed on medical device companies, and to modify our marketing claims regarding the registered product. While we have successfully registered the Galvanic Spa facial unit as a medical device in Indonesia, Thailand and Colombia, because medical device regulations vary widely from country to country, there can be no assurance we will not face challenges or delays in obtaining clearance in other markets, including the United States, or that we will be able to make any required modifications or provide documentation necessary to obtain clearance. If we obtain such medical device clearance in order to sell a product in one market, such clearance may be used as precedent for requiring similar approval in another market. Such additional requirements could negatively impact the cost associated with manufacturing the Galvanic Spa System and sale of the Galvanic Spa System as a non-medical device in those markets.
Government regulations relating to the marketing and advertising of our products and services may restrict, inhibit or delay our ability to sell our products and harm our business.
Our products and our related marketing and advertising efforts are subject to numerous domestic and foreign government agencies' and authorities' laws and extensive regulations, which govern the ingredients and products that may be marketed without pre-market approval and/or registration as a drug and the claims that may be made regarding such products. Many of these laws and regulations involve a high level of subjectivity, are inherently fact-based and subject to interpretation, and vary significantly from market to market. These laws and regulations can limit the claims we can make regarding our products and often restrict our ability to introduce products or ingredients into one or more markets. In Europe for example, we are unable to market supplements that contain ingredients that were not marketed in Europe prior to May 1997 ("novel foods") without going through an extensive registration and pre-market approval process. In addition, there has been increased regulatory scrutiny of nutritional supplements and marketing claims under existing and new regulations. At times these laws and regulations may prevent us from launching a product in a market, require us to reformulate a product or limit the claims made regarding a product. For example, in 2010 and 2011, the introduction and launch of our ageLOC Vitality were delayed in certain markets in Europe due to regulatory issues. If these laws and regulations further restrict, inhibit or delay our ability to introduce or market our products or limit the claims we are able to make regarding our products, our business may be harmed.
The FDA recently issued warning letters to several cosmetic companies alleging improper structure/function claims regarding their cosmetic products, including, for example, product claims regarding gene activity, cellular rejuvenation, and rebuilding collagen. There is a degree of subjectivity in determining whether a claim is an improper structure/function claim. Given this subjectivity and our research and development focus on the sources of aging and gene expression, there is a risk that we could receive a warning letter, be required to modify our product claims or take other actions to satisfy the FDA if the FDA determines any of our marketing materials include improper structure/function claims for our cosmetic products. In addition, plaintiffs' lawyers have filed class action lawsuits against some of our competitors after receiving these FDA warning letters. There can be no assurance that we will not be subject to governmental actions or class action lawsuits, which could harm our business.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Period
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average Price Paid per Share
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
(in millions)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1 – 31, 2012
|
|
|
333,700
|
|
|
$
|
46.39
|
|
|
|
333,700
|
|
|
$
|
208.0
|
|
August 1 – 31, 2012
|
|
|
691,600
|
|
|
$
|
42.65
|
|
|
|
691,600
|
|
|
$
|
178.5
|
|
September 1 – 30, 2012
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
$
|
41.77
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
|
|
$
|
157.2
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,535,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,535,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In August 1998, our board of directors approved a plan to repurchase $10.0 million of our Class A common stock on the open market or in private transactions. Our board has from time to time increased the amount authorized under the plan and a total amount of approximately $735.0 million was authorized as of September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, we had repurchased approximately $577.8 million of shares under the plan. On May 1, 2012, our board of directors authorized a $250.0 million extension of our ongoing share repurchase authorization which is included in the total authorized. There has been no termination or expiration of the plan since the initial date of approval. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Exhibits
Regulation S-K
Number Description
10.1 |
Employment Agreement, effective as of August 1, 2012, between the Company and M. Truman Hunt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2012). |
10.2 |
Form of Employment Agreement, with schedule of material differences, effective as of August 1, 2012, between the Company and Ritch N. Wood, Daniel R. Chard, D. Matthew Dorny and Scott E. Schwerdt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2012). |
31.1 |
Certification by M. Truman Hunt, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
Certification by Ritch N. Wood, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 |
Certification by M. Truman Hunt, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 |
Certification by Ritch N. Wood, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
November 1, 2012
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Ritch N. Wood
Its: |
Chief Financial Officer |
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)