Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are developed by combining currently available information with our beliefs and assumptions and are generally identified by the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future performance, which may be materially different from that expressed in, or implied by, any such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.

These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or within our control, and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. Factors that may cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

· factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, including those set forth under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Business”;

· defaults by borrowers in paying debt service on outstanding items;

· impairment in the value of real estate property securing our loans;

· availability of mortgage origination and acquisition opportunities acceptable to us;

· national and local economic and business conditions;

· general and local commercial real estate property conditions;

· changes in federal government policies;

· changes in federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations;

· increased competition from entities engaged in mortgage lending;

· changes in interest rates; and

· the availability of and costs associated with sources of liquidity.

In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurances that the results referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will in fact occur. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any such obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, changes to future results over time or otherwise.

2

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

7

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2011

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands unless specifically identified

and except for share and per share data)

1. Business and Organization

Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (“the Trust” together with its subsidiaries, “we” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that commenced operations (“Inception”) on August 17, 2009 upon the completion of its initial public offering (“IPO”). We are focused primarily on originating, investing in, financing and managing commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate debt investments, commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities. The Trust is externally managed and advised by SPT Management, LLC (the “Manager”).

We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As such, the Trust will generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on the portion of net income that is distributed to stockholders, if we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to stockholders by prescribed dates and comply with various other requirements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

A non-controlling interest in a consolidated subsidiary is defined as “the portion of the equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent”. Non-controlling interests are presented as a separate component of equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the presentation of net income attributes earnings to controlling and non-controlling interests.

The Company uses plain English when describing or referencing accounting standards in the notes to the financial statements. As a result, there may be no reference to particular accounting standards by name, standard number, or Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) reference number.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

Segment Reporting

We are a REIT focused on originating and acquiring real estate related debt investments and currently operate in one reportable segment.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and short-term investments. Short-term investments are comprised of highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in multiple financial institutions and at times these balances exceed federally insurable limits.

8

Debt Securities

GAAP requires that at the time of purchase, we designate debt securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading depending on our investment strategy and ability to hold such securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at cost plus any premiums or discounts, which are amortized or accreted through the consolidated statements of operations using the effective interest method.  Securities we (i) do not hold for the purpose of selling in the near-term or (ii) may dispose of prior to maturity, are designated as available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value with the unrealized gains or losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. As of June 30, 2011, our commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) and residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) were designated as available-for-sale.  The designation of each security involves management judgment which is subject to change. Such a change in judgment would have an impact on the accounting for the security.

When the estimated fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost, we consider whether there is an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) in the value of the security. An impairment is deemed an OTTI if (i) we intend to sell the security, (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering our cost basis, or (iii) we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security even if we do not intend to sell the security or believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering our cost basis. If the impairment is deemed to be an OTTI, the resulting accounting treatment depends on the factors causing the OTTI. If the OTTI has resulted from (i) our intention to sell the security, or (ii) our judgment that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering our cost basis, an impairment loss is recognized in current earnings equal to the entire difference between our amortized cost basis and fair value. Whereas, if the OTTI has resulted from our conclusion that we will not recover our cost basis even if we do not intend to sell the security or believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering our cost basis, only the credit loss portion of the impairment is recorded in current earnings, and the portion of the loss related to other factors, such as changes in interest rates, continues to be recognized in accumulated comprehensive income. Determining whether there is an OTTI may require us to exercise significant judgment and make significant assumptions, including, but not limited to, estimated cash flows, estimated prepayments, loss assumptions, and assumptions regarding changes in interest rates. As a result, actual OTTI losses could differ from reported amounts. Such judgments and assumptions are based upon a number of factors, including (i) credit of the issuer or the underlying borrowers, (ii) credit rating of the security, (iii) key terms of the security, (iv) performance of the underlying loans, including debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios, (v) the value of the collateral for the underlying loans, (vi) the effect of local, industry, and broader economic factors, and (vii) the historical and anticipated trends in defaults and loss severities for similar securities.

Loans Held for Investment

We purchase and originate commercial real estate debt and related instruments generally to be held for investment and to maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost unless the loans are deemed to be impaired.  Cost includes any unamortized acquisition premiums or discounts for purchased loans, and any unamortized loan fees or direct loan origination costs for originated loans.  We evaluate each loan classified as held for investment for impairment at least quarterly.  Impairment occurs when it is deemed probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. If a loan is considered to be impaired, we record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate, or the fair value of the collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans that we intend to sell or liquidate in the near-term are classified as held-for-sale and are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value, unless we have elected to record any such loans at fair value at the time they were acquired under FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments.  Upfront costs and fees related to loans for which the fair value option is elected are recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred.  See further disclosure regarding loans held for sale in Note 12.

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount of the investment security or loan and the contractual terms. Discounts or premiums associated with the purchase of an investment security are amortized into interest income as a yield adjustment on the effective interest method, based on expected cash flows through the expected maturity date of the security. For originated loans that we have not elected to record at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, origination fees and direct loan origination costs are also recognized in interest income over the loan term as a yield adjustment using the effective interest method.

Upon the repayment or sale of loans or securities, the excess (or deficiency) of net proceeds over the net carrying value of such securities or loans is recognized as a gain (or loss).

9

Securitization/Sale and Financing Arrangements

We may periodically enter into transactions in which we sell financial assets, such as commercial mortgage loans, CMBS and other assets. Upon a transfer of financial assets, we will sometimes retain or acquire senior or subordinated interests in the related assets. Gains and losses on such transactions will be recognized using the guidance in ASC 860-Transfers and Servicing, which is based on a financial components approach that focuses on control. Under this approach, after a transfer of financial assets that meets the criteria for treatment as a sale—legal isolation, ability of transferee to pledge or exchange the transferred assets without constraint, and transferred control—an entity recognizes the financial assets it retained and any liabilities it has incurred, derecognizes the financial assets it has sold, and derecognizes liabilities when extinguished. We will determine the gain or loss on sale of mortgage loans by allocating the carrying value of the underlying mortgage between securities or loans sold and the interests retained based on their fair values, as applicable. The gain or loss on sale is the difference between the cash proceeds from the sale and the amount allocated to the securities or loans sold.

Acquisition and Investment Pursuit Costs

Costs incurred in connection with both acquiring loans as well in pursuing unsuccessful loan acquisitions and originations are charged to current earnings and not deferred.

Foreign Currency Transactions

Our assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the reporting period. Income and expenses are translated at the approximate weighted average exchange rates for each reporting period. At June 30, 2011, the functional currency of all investments denominated in foreign currencies was the U.S. dollar. The effects of translating the assets, liabilities and income of our foreign investments are included in unrealized foreign currency remeasurement gain in the statements of operations.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments, CMBS, RMBS, loan investments and interest receivable. We may place cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. We perform an ongoing analysis of credit risk concentrations in its investment portfolio by evaluating exposure to various counter parties’ markets, underlying property types, contract terms, tenant mix and other credit metrics.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

GAAP provides the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how the entity accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Further, we must provide qualitative disclosures that explain our objectives and strategies for using derivatives, as well as quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments.

As required by GAAP, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We regularly enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of our risks, even though the transactions may not qualify for, or we may not elect, hedge accounting. In such cases, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in earnings.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with secured financing are capitalized and amortized over the respective term of the loan as a component of interest expense. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had approximately $3.8 million and $4.1 million, respectively, of capitalized financing costs, net of amortization. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of amortization was included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.  For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately $0.1 million of amortization was included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

Earnings per share

We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to us for the period by the weighted average of shares of common stock outstanding for that period. Diluted earnings per share takes into effect any dilutive instruments, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units, except when doing so would be anti-dilutive.

10

Share-based payments

We recognize the cost of share-based compensation and payment transactions in the consolidated financial statements using the same expense category as would be charged for payments in cash. The fair value of the restricted stock or restricted stock units granted is recorded to expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective yield method, over the vesting period for the entire award, with an offsetting increase in stockholders’ equity. For grants to employees and directors, the fair value is determined based upon the stock price on the grant date. For non-employee grants, the fair value is based on the stock price when the shares vest, which requires the amount to be adjusted in each subsequent reporting period based on the fair value of the award at the end of the reporting period until the award has vested.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT and intend to comply with the Code with respect thereto. Accordingly, we will not be subject to federal income tax as long as certain asset, income, dividend distribution and stock ownership tests are met. Many of these requirements are technical and complex and if we fail to meet these requirements we may be subject to federal, state, and local income tax and penalties. A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to 100% penalty tax. We formed two taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) in 2010 to reduce the impact of the prohibited transaction tax and to avoid penalty for the holding of assets not qualifying as real estate assets for purposes of the REIT asset tests. The income, if any, associated with such activities is subject to federal and state income taxes as a domestic C corporation based upon the TRS’ net income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.8 million and $1.2 million related to the activities in our TRS, based on a Federal income tax rate of 34% and state income tax rate of 7.5%.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $40 and $40 related to the activities in our TRS, based on a Federal income tax rate of 33% and state income tax rate of 7.5%.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.  This update revises the criteria for assessing effective control for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity.  The update will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, early adoption is prohibited, and the amendments will be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date.  We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement:  Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  This update amends the existing fair value guidance to improve consistency in the application and disclosure of fair value measurements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.  ASU 2011-04 provides certain clarifications to the existing guidance, changes certain fair value principles, and enhances disclosure requirements.  The update will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2012, early adoption is prohibited, and the amendments will be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date.  We have not completed our evaluation as to whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income.  Prior to the issuance of ASU 2011-05, existing GAAP allowed three alternatives for presentation of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and its components in financial statements.  ASU 2011-05 removes the option to present the components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in equity.  In addition, ASU 2011-05 requires consecutive presentation of the statement of operations and OCI and presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from OCI to net income.  These changes apply to both annual and interim financial statements commencing, with retrospective application, for the fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted.  We do not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

11

3. Debt Securities

We classified all CMBS and RMBS investments as available-for-sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The CMBS and RMBS classified as available-for-sale are accounted for at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The tables below summarize the weighted average coupon, rating and life of our investments in mortgage backed securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(1)          Generally calculated using the June 30, 2011 one-month LIBOR rate of 0.1856%.

(2)          Excludes securities that are not rated, whose aggregate fair value was $185.7 million.

(1)          Calculated using the December 31, 2010 one-month LIBOR rate of 0.2606%.

During the six-months ended June 30, 2011, the purchases and sales trades executed, as well as the principal payments received, were as follows:

During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we exercised a pre-existing right to convert one of our loans into a CMBS in order to maximize the liquidity of our investment.  We therefore reclassified the loan, which had a carrying amount of $176.6 million, from loans held for investment to mortgage-backed securities, available-for-sale, at fair value and recognized an unrealized gain of $7.9 million.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we sold various CMBS positions with aggregate gross proceeds of $176.5 million ($38.9 million after repaying the related financing) and $211.6 million ($74.0 million after repaying related financing), respectively, which generated gains of approximately $4.0 million and $9.9 million, respectively. Additionally, $5.6 million and $11.8 million of our CMBS portfolio matured as of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

From inception in 2009 through the first two quarters of 2010, a portion of our CMBS portfolio was designated as held-to-maturity. However, during the third quarter of 2010 our investment strategy with respect to these securities changed, and we no longer intended to hold them to maturity. As a result, we reclassified these securities to available-for-sale and recorded an unrealized gain in connection with this reclassification of approximately $10.3 million.

As of June 30, 2011, 100%, of the CMBS are variable rate and pay interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 1.72%.  As of December 31, 2010, 5.0% of the CMBS were variable rate and paid interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 1.30%.

12

Subject to certain limitations on durations, we have allocated an amount to invest in RMBS that cannot exceed 10% of our total assets. We have engaged a third party manager who specializes in RMBS to execute the trading of RMBS, the cost of which was $0.4 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2011, which has been recorded as an offset to interest income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As of June 30, 2011, approximately $79.8 million, or 99.3%, of the RMBS are variable rate and pay interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 0.27%. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $120.7 million, or 98.5%, of the RMBS were variable rate and pay interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 0.31%.  We purchased all of the RMBS at a discount that will be accreted into income over the expected remaining life of the security. The majority of the income from this strategy is earned from the accretion of these discounts.

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of our securities that are in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

As of June 30, 2011, there were 14 securities with unrealized losses.  We considered whether any of these unrealized losses were an OTTI.  As a result of this evaluation, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded OTTI related to five securities (with a fair value of $15.5 million) of $1.3 million, bringing the OTTI for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $1.7 million, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.  As of June 30, 2011, these five securities had credit ratings ranging from B+ to CCC.  We determined that substantially all of this OTTI resulted from a reduction in the expected future cash flows due to credit losses.  We further determined that none of the nine remaining securities were other-than-temporarily impaired, considering a number of factors in our conclusion, including that we did not intend to sell any individual security, it was not considered more likely than not that we would be forced to sell any individual security prior to recovering our amortized cost, and the existence of no material credit events that would have caused us to otherwise conclude that we would not recover our cost. In addition, unrealized losses for each of these securities had existed for less than 12 months and the fair values were less than 5% below their respective amortized cost balances.

4. Loans

Our investments in mortgages and loans held-for-investment are accounted for at amortized cost and the loans held-for-sale are accounted for the lower of cost or fair value, unless we elect to record such loans at fair value. The following table summarizes our investments in mortgages and loans by subordination class as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

13

(1)         Subordinated mortgages includes (i) subordinated mortgages that we retain after having sold first mortgage positions related to the same collateral, (ii) B-Notes, and (iii) subordinated loan participants.

As of June 30, 2011, approximately $765.2 million, or 35.0% of the loans are variable rate and pay interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 4.77%.  Of the approximately $765.2 million of floating rate loans, $635.3 million pay interest using 1-Month LIBOR and $129.9 million pay interest using 3-Month LIBOR.  As of December 31, 2010, approximately $332.7 million, or 23.3% of the loans are variable rate and pay interest at LIBOR plus a weighted average spread of 2.3%.  Of the approximately $332.7 million of floating rate loans, $211.5 million pay interest using 1-Month LIBOR and $121.2 million pay interest using 3-Month LIBOR.

As described in Note 2, we evaluate our loans for impairment at least quarterly.  Our loans are typically collateralized by real estate. As a result, we regularly evaluate the extent and impact of any credit deterioration associated with the performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property as well as the financial and operating capability of the borrower. Specifically, a property’s operating results and any cash reserves are analyzed and used to assess (i) whether cash from operations are sufficient to cover the debt service requirements currently and into the future, (ii) the ability of the borrower to refinance the loan, and/or (iii) the property’s liquidation value. We also evaluate the financial wherewithal of any loan guarantors as well as the borrower’s competency in managing and operating the properties. In addition, we consider the overall economic environment, real estate sector, and geographic sub-market in which the borrower operates. Such impairment analyses are completed and reviewed by asset management and finance personnel, who utilize various data sources, including (i) periodic financial data such as property occupancy, tenant profile, rental rates, operating

14

expenses, the borrower’s exit plan, and capitalization and discount rates, (ii) site inspections, and (iii) current credit spreads and discussions with market participants.

Our evaluation process as described above produces an internal risk rating of between 1 and 5, which is a weighted average of the numerical ratings in the following categories: (i) sponsor capability and financial condition, (ii) loan and collateral performance relative to underwriting, (iii) quality and stability of collateral cash flows, and (iv) loan structure. We utilize the overall risk ratings as a concise means to monitor any credit migration on a loan as well as on the whole portfolio.  While the overall risk rating is not the sole factor we use in determining whether a loan is impaired, a loan with a higher overall risk rating would tend to have more adverse indicators of impairment, and therefore would be more likely to experience a credit loss.

The rating categories generally include the characteristics described below, but these are utilized as guidelines and therefore not every loan will have all of the characteristics described in each category:

As of June 30, 2011, the risk ratings by class of loan were as follows: