UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-06605
EQUIFAX INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
58-0401110 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1550 Peachtree Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices) |
30309 (Zip Code) |
404-885-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
On October 12, 2012, there were 119,598,117 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
EQUIFAX INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
INDEX
Page | ||
PART I. | Financial Information | 4 |
Item 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 4 |
Consolidated Statements of Income—Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 4 | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 6 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets—September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | 7 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 8 | |
Consolidated Statements of Equity and Other Comprehensive Income—Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 | 9 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 10 | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 21 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 37 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 37 |
PART II. | Other Information | 38 |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 38 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 38 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 40 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 41 |
Signatures | 42 | |
Index to Exhibits | 43 |
2 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains information that may constitute “forward-looking statements.” Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “will,” “may” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, including statements relating to future operating results, are forward-looking statements. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our Company’s historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part II, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of such risks and uncertainties, we urge you not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
3 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Operating revenue | $ | 543.9 | $ | 490.4 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization below ) | 208.5 | 186.6 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 162.8 | 141.7 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 40.5 | 40.5 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 411.8 | 368.8 | ||||||
Operating income | 132.1 | 121.6 | ||||||
Interest expense | (13.6 | ) | (13.7 | ) | ||||
Other income, net | 1.9 | 0.6 | ||||||
Consolidated income before income taxes | 120.4 | 108.5 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | (40.3 | ) | (39.2 | ) | ||||
Consolidated net income | 80.1 | 69.3 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (2.2 | ) | (2.6 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Equifax | $ | 77.9 | $ | 66.7 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share: | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.55 | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic earnings per share | 119.7 | 121.8 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.54 | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share | 122.2 | 123.3 | ||||||
Dividends per common share | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.16 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4 |
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Operating revenue | $ | 1,602.4 | $ | 1,450.1 | ||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||
Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization below ) | 613.3 | 567.3 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 472.2 | 413.2 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 123.1 | 124.3 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,208.6 | 1,104.8 | ||||||
Operating income | 393.8 | 345.3 | ||||||
Interest expense | (41.1 | ) | (41.2 | ) | ||||
Other income, net | 5.5 | (8.7 | ) | |||||
Consolidated income before income taxes | 358.2 | 295.4 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | (125.6 | ) | (129.7 | ) | ||||
Consolidated net income | 232.6 | 165.7 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (6.8 | ) | (7.2 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Equifax | $ | 225.8 | $ | 158.5 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share: | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.29 | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic earnings per share | 120.0 | 122.5 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.28 | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share | 122.4 | 124.2 | ||||||
Dividends per common share | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.48 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5 |
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equifax | Noncontrolling | Equifax | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders | Interests | Total | Shareholders | Interests | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 77.9 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 80.1 | $ | 66.7 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 69.3 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net | 14.7 | 0.1 | 14.8 | (27.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (28.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Change in unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial losses related to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net | 3.1 | - | 3.1 | 2.2 | - | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative loss from cash flow hedging transactions, net | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 95.8 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 98.1 | $ | 41.3 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 43.5 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equifax | Noncontrolling | Equifax | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders | Interests | Total | Shareholders | Interests | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 225.8 | $ | 6.8 | $ | 232.6 | $ | 158.5 | $ | 7.2 | $ | 165.7 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 9.3 | (0.2 | ) | 9.1 | 16.5 | (0.1 | ) | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in unrecognized prior service cost and actuarial losses related to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans | 9.3 | - | 9.3 | 6.6 | - | 6.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in cumulative loss from cash flow hedging transactions | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 244.6 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 251.2 | $ | 181.7 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 188.8 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6 |
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions, except par values) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 267.2 | $ | 127.7 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6.6 and $5.9 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 296.9 | 284.4 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 30.2 | 24.6 | ||||||
Other current assets | 11.4 | 15.6 | ||||||
Total current assets | 605.7 | 452.3 | ||||||
Property and equipment: | ||||||||
Capitalized internal-use software and system costs | 361.6 | 332.2 | ||||||
Data processing equipment and furniture | 203.0 | 183.1 | ||||||
Land, buildings and improvements | 176.4 | 178.4 | ||||||
Total property and equipment | 741.0 | 693.7 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (454.8 | ) | (400.8 | ) | ||||
Total property and equipment, net | 286.2 | 292.9 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,974.5 | 1,961.2 | ||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | 95.7 | 95.6 | ||||||
Purchased intangible assets, net | 487.6 | 550.2 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 156.2 | 156.4 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,605.9 | $ | 3,508.6 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 16.9 | $ | 47.2 | ||||
Accounts payable | 28.6 | 27.5 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 72.5 | 56.3 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and bonuses | 79.5 | 79.2 | ||||||
Deferred revenue | 54.1 | 55.8 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 73.9 | 96.8 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 325.5 | 362.8 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 951.4 | 966.0 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities, net | 228.6 | 227.8 | ||||||
Long-term pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities | 163.3 | 176.4 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 53.9 | 53.5 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,722.7 | 1,786.5 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 5) | ||||||||
Equifax shareholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: Authorized shares - 10.0; Issued shares - none | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, $1.25 par value: Authorized shares - 300.0; Issued shares - 189.3 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011; Outstanding shares - 119.3 and 119.6 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 236.6 | 236.6 | ||||||
Paid-in capital | 1,131.6 | 1,118.0 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 3,039.9 | 2,879.2 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (373.0 | ) | (391.8 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 69.4 shares and 69.1 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | (2,170.4 | ) | (2,133.7 | ) | ||||
Stock held by employee benefits trusts, at cost, 0.6 shares at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | (5.9 | ) | (5.9 | ) | ||||
Total Equifax shareholders' equity | 1,858.8 | 1,702.4 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 24.4 | 19.7 | ||||||
Total equity | 1,883.2 | 1,722.1 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 3,605.9 | $ | 3,508.6 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7 |
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Consolidated net income | $ | 232.6 | $ | 165.7 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Loss on divestiture | - | 27.8 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 122.8 | 123.8 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 20.0 | 17.3 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans | (0.2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes | (3.8 | ) | 7.0 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | (9.5 | ) | (18.7 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (2.4 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||
Other assets | (2.4 | ) | 10.4 | |||||
Current liabilities, excluding debt | (7.2 | ) | (55.2 | ) | ||||
Other long-term liabilities, excluding debt | 2.2 | (11.7 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by operating activities | 352.1 | 259.0 | ||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (49.3 | ) | (59.2 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (7.3 | ) | (112.2 | ) | ||||
Cash received from divestitures | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates, net | (3.7 | ) | (4.2 | ) | ||||
Cash used in investing activities | (57.8 | ) | (173.1 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Net short-term (repayments) borrowings | (28.1 | ) | 46.5 | |||||
Payments on long-term debt | (15.1 | ) | (16.7 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock purchases | (85.1 | ) | (75.2 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to Equifax shareholders | (64.5 | ) | (58.7 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | (1.9 | ) | (5.6 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 40.9 | 12.9 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans | 0.2 | 0.6 | ||||||
Other | - | (2.7 | ) | |||||
Cash used in financing activities | (153.6 | ) | (98.9 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (1.2 | ) | (4.4 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 139.5 | (17.4 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 127.7 | 119.4 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 267.2 | $ | 102.0 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8 |
EQUIFAX INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
Equifax Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Held By | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Other | Employee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Paid-In | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Benefits | Noncontrolling | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Stock | Trusts | Interests | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 | 119.6 | $ | 236.6 | $ | 1,118.0 | $ | 2,879.2 | $ | (391.8 | ) | $ | (2,133.7 | ) | $ | (5.9 | ) | $ | 19.7 | $ | 1,722.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | - | - | - | 225.8 | - | - | - | 6.8 | 232.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | - | - | - | - | 18.8 | - | - | (0.2 | ) | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued under stock and benefit plans, net of minimum tax withholdings | 1.6 | - | (11.2 | ) | - | - | 48.4 | - | - | 37.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased under share repurchase program ($45.73 per share)* | (1.9 | ) | - | - | - | - | (85.1 | ) | - | - | (85.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends ($0.54 per share) | - | - | - | (65.1 | ) | - | - | - | (65.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to employee benefits trusts | - | - | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | - | - | 20.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 20.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax effects of stock-based compensation plans | - | - | 4.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 4.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1.9 | ) | (1.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2012 | 119.3 | $ | 236.6 | $ | 1,131.6 | $ | 3,039.9 | $ | (373.0 | ) | $ | (2,170.4 | ) | $ | (5.9 | ) | $ | 24.4 | $ | 1,883.2 |
* | At September 30, 2012, $227.1 million was authorized for future purchases of common stock under our share repurchase authorization. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss consists of the following components:
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation | $ | (80.0 | ) | $ | (89.3 | ) | ||
Unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service cost related to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net of accumulated tax of $167.5 and $172.1 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | (291.0 | ) | (300.3 | ) | ||||
Cash flow hedging transactions, net of accumulated tax of $1.4 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | (2.0 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (373.0 | ) | $ | (391.8 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
9 |
EQUIFAX INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
September 30, 2012
As used herein, the terms Equifax, the Company, we, our and us refer to Equifax Inc., a Georgia corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a combined entity, except where it is clear that the terms mean only Equifax Inc.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations. We collect, organize and manage various types of financial, demographic, employment and marketing information. Our products and services enable businesses to make credit and service decisions, manage their portfolio risk, automate or outsource certain human resources, employment tax and payroll-related business processes, and develop marketing strategies concerning consumers and commercial enterprises. We serve customers across a wide range of industries, including the financial services, mortgage, retail, telecommunications, utilities, automotive, brokerage, healthcare and insurance industries, as well as government agencies. We also enable consumers to manage and protect their financial health through a portfolio of products offered directly to consumers. As of September 30, 2012, we operated in the following countries: Argentina, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, or U.K., Uruguay, and the United States of America, or U.S. We also maintain support operations in the Republic of Ireland. We have an investment in a consumer and commercial credit information company in Brazil and offer credit services in Russia and India through joint ventures.
We develop, maintain and enhance secured proprietary information databases through the compilation of actual consumer data, including credit, employment, asset, liquidity, net worth and spending activity, and business data, including credit and business demographics, that we obtain from a variety of sources, such as credit granting institutions, public record information (including bankruptcies, liens and judgments), income and tax information primarily from large to mid-sized companies in the U.S., and marketing information. We process this information utilizing our proprietary information management systems.
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable sections of Regulation S-X. To understand our complete financial position and results, as defined by GAAP, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (“2011 Form 10-K”).
Our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the periods presented and are of a normal recurring nature. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Earnings Per Share. Our basic earnings per share, or EPS, is calculated as net income attributable to Equifax divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated to reflect the potential dilution that would occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and resulted in additional common shares outstanding. The net income amounts used in both our basic and diluted EPS calculations are the same. A reconciliation of the weighted-average outstanding shares used in the two calculations is as follows:
10 |
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding (basic) | 119.7 | 121.8 | 120.0 | 122.5 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock units | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding (diluted) | 122.2 | 123.3 | 122.4 | 124.2 |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the stock options that were anti-dilutive were not material. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, 3.2 million and 2.1 million stock options, respectively, were anti-dilutive and therefore excluded from this calculation.
Financial Instruments. Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and short- and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of these items, other than long-term debt, approximate their fair market values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of our fixed-rate debt is determined using Level 2 inputs such as quoted market prices for publicly traded instruments, and for non-publicly traded instruments through valuation techniques depending on the specific characteristics of the debt instrument. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of our long-term debt, based on observable inputs, was $1.11 billion and $1.09 billion, respectively, compared to its carrying value of $0.95 billion and $0.97 billion, respectively.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities. We use derivative financial instruments as a risk management tool to hedge the Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates, not for speculative purposes. We have used interest rate swaps and interest rate lock agreements to manage interest rate risk associated with our fixed and floating-rate borrowings. Forward contracts on various foreign currencies have been used to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk of certain firm commitments denominated in foreign currencies. We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivative valuations reflect the value of the instrument including material amounts associated with counterparty risk.
Fair Value Hedges. In conjunction with our November 2009 sale of five-year Senior Notes, we entered into five-year interest rate swaps, designated as fair value hedges, which convert the debt’s fixed interest rate to a variable rate. These swaps involve the receipt of fixed rate amounts for floating interest rate payments over the life of the swaps without exchange of the underlying principal amount. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps offset changes in the fair value of the fixed-rate Senior Notes they hedge due to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate and are recorded in interest expense. The fair value of these interest rate swaps was an asset of $13.7 million and $14.8 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and was recorded in other long-term assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is determined based on the assumptions marketplace participants use in pricing the asset or liability. We use a three level fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in valuation techniques between observable inputs that reflect quoted prices in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices with observable market data and unobservable data (e.g., a company’s own data).
11 |
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
The following table presents items measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value of Assets | Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
(Liabilities) at | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | September 30, 2012 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Interest Rate Swaps(1) | $ | 13.7 | $ | - | $ | 13.7 | $ | - | ||||||||
Notes, due 2014(1) | (288.7 | ) | - | (288.7 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Deferred Compensation Plan(2) | (16.2 | ) | - | (16.2 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (291.2 | ) | $ | - | $ | (291.2 | ) | $ | - |
(1) The fair value of our interest rate swaps, which are designated as fair value hedges, and our notes, due in 2014, are based on the present value of expected future cash flows using zero coupon rates and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(2) We maintain deferred compensation plans that allow for certain management employees to defer the receipt of compensation (such as salary, incentive compensation and commissions) until a later date based on the terms of the plan. The liability representing benefits accrued for plan participants is valued at the quoted market prices of the participants’ investment elections.
Variable Interest Entities. We hold interests in certain entities, including credit data and information solutions ventures, that are considered variable interest entities, or VIEs. These variable interests relate to ownership interests that require financial support for these entities. Our investments related to these VIEs totaled $12.6 million at September 30, 2012, representing our maximum exposure to loss. We are not the primary beneficiary and are not required to consolidate any of these VIEs.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. Testing Goodwill for Impairment. In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment (the revised standard). The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a “qualitative” assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We implemented the new standard in our 2012 annual goodwill impairment testing, and it did not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Comprehensive Income. In the first quarter of 2012, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which changed our financial statement presentation but did not have an effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” which allows a company the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. Under that option, a company would no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the company determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. This guidance is effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. We will implement the new standard in our 2013 annual impairment testing. This guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
For additional information about recent accounting pronouncements adopted or pending adoption, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
12 |
2. MERGER OF BRAZILIAN BUSINESS
On May 31, 2011, we completed the merger of our Brazilian business with Boa Vista Serviços S.A. (“BVS”) in exchange for a 15% equity interest in BVS, which was accounted for as a sale and deconsolidated (the “Brazilian Transaction”). BVS, an unrelated third party whose results we do not consolidate, is the second largest consumer and commercial credit information company in Brazil. Our investment in BVS was valued at 130 million Brazilian Reais ($63.9 million and $82.3 million at September 30, 2012 and May 31, 2011, respectively) and is recorded in Other assets, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is accounted for using the cost method. The initial fair value was determined by a third-party using income and market approaches and has not changed materially as of September 30, 2012. In accounting for the transaction, we wrote off $33.2 million of goodwill and $27.0 million of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments. In addition, as part of the agreement with BVS, we have retained certain contingent liabilities. A pre-tax loss of $10.3 million was recognized during the second quarter of 2011 related to the Brazilian Transaction and is included in other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Tax expense of $17.5 million was also recorded in conjunction with the Brazilian Transaction.
Equifax has committed to make certain additional funding available to BVS. Until May 31, 2013, BVS will have the right to borrow up to $55 million from Equifax for general corporate purposes; any borrowings would be due and payable on May 31, 2015. Payments for principal and interest on any borrowings will be convertible, at Equifax’s option, into additional shares of BVS nonvoting preferred stock. Preferred shares issued as a result of any borrowings will be convertible to common shares under specific conditions. There were no borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2012.
3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the cost in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We perform our annual goodwill impairment tests as of September 30.
Our annual goodwill impairment testing was completed during the third quarter of 2012. The fair value estimates for our reporting units were determined using a combination of the income and market approaches in accordance with our methodology as discussed in the “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” section in the Form 10-Q. The estimated fair value for all reporting units exceeded the carrying value of those units as of September 30, 2012. As a result, no goodwill impairment was recorded. Changes in the amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, are as follows:
U.S. Consumer | North America | North America | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Information | Workforce | Personal | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||
Solutions | International | Solutions | Solutions | Solutions | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 | $ | 638.4 | $ | 348.5 | $ | 935.0 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 37.5 | $ | 1,961.2 | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions | - | 4.1 | - | - | - | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to initial purchase price allocation | - | - | 0.2 | - | - | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | - | 10.0 | - | - | 0.2 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefits of stock options exercised | - | - | (1.2 | ) | - | - | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2012 | $ | 638.4 | $ | 362.6 | $ | 934.0 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 37.7 | $ | 1,974.5 |
13 |
3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of contractual/territorial rights representing the estimated acquisition date fair value of rights to operate in certain territories acquired through the purchase of independent credit reporting agencies in the U.S. and Canada. Our contractual/territorial rights are perpetual in nature and, therefore, the useful lives are considered indefinite. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized. We are required to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that there may be an impairment of the asset value. We perform our annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test as of September 30. Our 2012 annual impairment test completed during the third quarter of 2012 resulted in no impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets. Our contractual/territorial rights carrying amounts did not change materially during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Purchased Intangible Assets. Purchased intangible assets represent the estimated acquisition date fair value of acquired intangible assets used in our business. Purchased data files represent the estimated acquisition date fair value of consumer credit files acquired primarily through the purchase of independent credit reporting agencies in the U.S. and Canada. We expense the cost of modifying and updating credit files in the period such costs are incurred. We amortize purchased data files, which primarily consist of acquired consumer credit files, on a straight-line basis. Primarily all of our other purchased intangible assets are also amortized on a straight-line basis. For additional information about the useful lives related to our purchased intangible assets, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
Purchased intangible assets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Amortization | Net | Gross | Amortization | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Definite-lived intangible assets: | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased data files | $ | 299.5 | $ | (237.1 | ) | $ | 62.4 | $ | 316.2 | $ | (240.5 | ) | $ | 75.7 | ||||||||||
Acquired software and technology | 34.9 | (12.7 | ) | 22.2 | 68.3 | (41.1 | ) | 27.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | 519.7 | (155.6 | ) | 364.1 | 518.2 | (130.3 | ) | 387.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Proprietary database | 125.0 | (110.9 | ) | 14.1 | 125.0 | (95.5 | ) | 29.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements | 9.2 | (4.9 | ) | 4.3 | 9.0 | (3.1 | ) | 5.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Trade names and other intangible assets | 41.0 | (20.5 | ) | 20.5 | 40.7 | (16.7 | ) | 24.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total definite-lived intangible assets | $ | 1,029.3 | $ | (541.7 | ) | $ | 487.6 | $ | 1,077.4 | $ | (527.2 | ) | $ | 550.2 |
Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets was $22.1 million and $21.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets was $66.8 million and $67.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
14 |
4. DEBT
Debt outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Commercial paper | $ | - | $ | 30.0 | ||||
Notes, 7.34%, due in installments through May 2014 | 30.0 | 45.0 | ||||||
Notes, 4.45%, due December 2014 | 275.0 | 275.0 | ||||||
Notes, 6.30%, due July 2017 | 272.5 | 272.5 | ||||||
Debentures, 6.90%, due July 2028 | 125.0 | 125.0 | ||||||
Notes, 7.00%, due July 2037 | 250.0 | 250.0 | ||||||
Capitalized lease obligation | 2.6 | 1.1 | ||||||
Other | 0.7 | 0.6 | ||||||
Total debt | 955.8 | 999.2 | ||||||
Less short-term debt and current maturities | (16.9 | ) | (47.2 | ) | ||||
Less unamortized discounts | (1.7 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||
Plus fair value adjustments | 14.2 | 15.8 | ||||||
Total long-term debt, net | $ | 951.4 | $ | 966.0 |
Senior Credit Facility. We are party to a $500.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which we refer to as the Senior Credit Facility, with a group of financial institutions. The Senior Credit Facility also has an accordion feature that allows us to request an increase in the total commitment to $750.0 million should we so choose. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and share repurchase programs. The Senior Credit Facility is scheduled to expire in February 2015. Availability of the Senior Credit Facility for borrowings is reduced by the outstanding face amount of any letters of credit issued under the facility and, pursuant to our existing Board of Directors authorization, by the outstanding principal amount of our commercial paper notes. As of September 30, 2012, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility and $498.6 million was available for borrowing.
Commercial Paper Program. Our $500.0 million commercial paper program has been established through the private placement of commercial paper notes from time-to-time. Maturities of commercial paper can range from overnight to 397 days. The commercial paper program is supported by our Senior Credit Facility and, pursuant to our existing Board of Directors authorization, the total amount of commercial paper which may be issued is reduced by the amount of any outstanding borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility. At September 30, 2012, there were no commercial paper notes outstanding.
For additional information about our debt agreements, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
15 |
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Data Processing, Outsourcing Services and Other Agreements. We have separate agreements with IBM, TCS and others to outsource portions of our computer data processing operations, applications development, maintenance and related functions and to provide certain other administrative and operational services. The agreements expire between 2012 and 2018. The estimated aggregate minimum contractual obligation remaining under these agreements is approximately $70 million as of December 31, 2011, with no future year’s minimum contractual obligation expected to exceed approximately $30 million. During the third quarter of 2012, we provided notification that we would be terminating certain portions of our IBM agreement. This termination reduced our aggregate minimum contractual obligation by approximately $15 million. Annual payment obligations in regard to these agreements vary due to factors such as the volume of data processed; changes in our servicing needs as a result of new product offerings, acquisitions or divestitures; the introduction of significant new technologies; foreign currency; or the general rate of inflation. In certain circumstances (e.g., a change in control or for our convenience), we may terminate these data processing and outsourcing agreements, and, in doing so, certain of these agreements require us to pay a significant penalty.
Agreement with Computer Sciences Corporation. We have an agreement with Computer Sciences Corporation, or CSC, and certain of its affiliates, collectively CSC, under which CSC-owned credit reporting agencies utilize our computerized credit database services. CSC retains ownership of its credit files and the revenues generated by its credit reporting activities. We receive a processing fee for maintaining the database and for each report supplied. The current term of the agreement will expire on July 31, 2018 and renews, unless terminated by CSC, for successive ten-year periods. The agreement provides us with an option to purchase CSC’s credit reporting business if, on or prior to August 1, 2013, (a) CSC gives us written notice of their intention to terminate the agreement at the end of the current term, or (b) there is a change in control of CSC while the agreement is in effect. Under the agreement CSC also has an option, exercisable at any time prior to August 1, 2013, to sell its credit reporting business to us. The option exercise price will be determined by a third-party appraisal process and would be due in cash within 180 days after the exercise of the option. We estimate that if the option were exercised at September 30, 2012, the price range would have been approximately $750 million to $1 billion, including the impact of market growth and pricing trends in recent periods. This estimate is based on our internal analysis of the value of the business, current market conditions and other factors, all of which are subject to constant change. Therefore, the actual option exercise price could be materially higher or lower than the estimated amount.
Guarantees and General Indemnifications. We may issue standby letters of credit, performance bonds or other guarantees in the normal course of business. The aggregate notional amount of all performance bonds and standby letters of credit was not material at September 30, 2012, and all have a remaining maturity of one year or less. The maximum potential future payments we could be required to make under the guarantees is not material at September 30, 2012.
We have agreed to standard indemnification clauses in many of our lease agreements for office space, covering such things as tort, environmental and other liabilities that arise out of or relate to our use or occupancy of the leased premises. Certain of our credit agreements include provisions which require us to make payments to preserve an expected economic return to the lenders if that economic return is diminished due to certain changes in law or regulations. In conjunction with certain transactions, such as sales or purchases of operating assets or services in the ordinary course of business, or the disposition of certain assets or businesses, we sometimes provide routine indemnifications, the terms of which range in duration and sometimes are not limited. Additionally, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law against liabilities that arise by reason of their status as directors or officers. The Company maintains directors and officers liability insurance coverage to reduce its exposure to such obligations.
16 |
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
We cannot reasonably estimate our potential future payments under the indemnities and related provisions described above because we cannot predict when and under what circumstances these provisions may be triggered. We had no accruals related to indemnifications on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
Contingencies. We are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We periodically assess our exposure related to these matters based on the information which is available. We have recorded accruals in our Consolidated Financial Statements for those matters in which it is probable that we have incurred a loss and the amount of the loss, or range of loss, can be reasonably estimated.
For other legal proceedings, claims and litigation, we have recorded loss contingencies that are immaterial, or we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because of uncertainties about the outcome of the matter and the amount of the loss or range of loss. Although the final outcome of these other matters cannot be predicted with certainty, any possible adverse outcome arising from these matters is not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements, either individually or in the aggregate. However, our evaluation of the likely impact of these matters may change in the future.
For additional information about these and other commitments and contingencies, see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K. For additional information about commitments related to the Brazilian Transaction, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this 10-Q.
6. INCOME TAXES
We are subject to U.S. federal, state and international income taxes. We are generally no longer subject to federal, state, or international income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ending prior to December 31, 2005, with few exceptions. Due to the potential for resolution of state and foreign examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitations, it is reasonably possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefit balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of $0 to $9.1 million.
Effective Tax Rate. Our effective income tax rate was 33.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, down from 36.2% for the same period in 2011 due to lower foreign income taxes and the favorable impact of discrete tax items. The effective income tax rate was 35.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, down from 43.9% for the same period in 2011 with the decrease primarily due to the Brazilian Transaction. The impact of the Brazilian Transaction increased our effective rate 7.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The effective income tax rate on the Brazilian Transaction was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of tax impacts related to foreign currency changes for which we had not previously recorded tax expense because we have historically been permanently invested in Brazil with respect to foreign currency fluctuations. The nine month effective income tax rate also decreased due to the impact of lower foreign income taxes and the impact of discrete items.
17 |
7. BENEFIT PLANS
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans. For additional information about our benefit plans, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1.6 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 8.3 | 8.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (11.6 | ) | (11.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 0.2 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Recognized actuarial loss | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Total net periodic benefit cost | $ | 2.5 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.4 |
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 4.8 | $ | 4.8 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.4 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 24.9 | 25.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (34.8 | ) | (34.9 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | 0.6 | 0.6 | (0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Recognized actuarial loss | 12.0 | 9.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Total net periodic benefit cost | $ | 7.5 | $ | 5.3 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 1.2 |
18 |
8. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Reportable Segments. We manage our business and report our financial results through the following five reportable segments, which are the same as our operating segments:
- | U.S. Consumer Information Solutions |
- | International |
- | Workforce Solutions |
- | North America Personal Solutions |
- | North America Commercial Solutions |
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in our summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K. We evaluate the performance of these reportable segments based on their operating revenues, operating income and operating margins, excluding unusual or infrequent items, if any. Inter-segment sales and transfers are not material for all periods presented. The measurement criteria for segment profit or loss and segment assets are substantially the same for each reportable segment. All transactions between segments are accounted for at cost, and no timing differences occur between segments.
A summary of segment products and services is as follows:
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions. This segment includes consumer information services (such as credit information and credit scoring, credit modeling services, locate services, fraud detection and prevention services, identity verification services and other consulting services); mortgage loan origination information, appraisal, title and closing services; consumer financial marketing services; and identity management.
International. This segment includes information services products, which includes consumer and commercial services (such as credit and financial information, credit scoring and credit modeling services), credit and other marketing products and services, and products and services sold directly to consumers similar to those sold by North America Personal Solutions.
Workforce Solutions. This segment includes employment, income and social security number verification services as well as complementary payroll-based transaction services and employment tax and talent management services.
North America Personal Solutions. This segment includes credit information, credit monitoring and identity theft protection products sold directly to consumers via the internet.
North America Commercial Solutions. This segment includes commercial products and services such as business credit and demographic information, credit scores and portfolio analytics (decisioning tools), which are derived from our databases of business credit and financial information.
19 |
8. SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
Operating revenue and operating income by operating segment during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
Operating revenue: | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions | $ | 233.3 | $ | 202.0 | $ | 681.1 | $ | 577.0 | ||||||||
International | 121.0 | 118.6 | 361.5 | 376.6 | ||||||||||||
Workforce Solutions | 117.0 | 102.8 | 345.9 | 298.5 | ||||||||||||
North America Personal Solutions | 51.4 | 45.5 | 151.6 | 135.1 | ||||||||||||
North America Commercial Solutions | 21.2 | 21.5 | 62.3 | 62.9 | ||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 543.9 | $ | 490.4 | $ | 1,602.4 | $ | 1,450.1 |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
Operating income: | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions | $ | 86.1 | $ | 74.0 | $ | 253.6 | $ | 206.5 | ||||||||
International | 33.1 | 34.7 | 106.6 | 98.7 | ||||||||||||
Workforce Solutions | 28.6 | 23.6 | 81.7 | 66.1 | ||||||||||||
North America Personal Solutions | 16.5 | 15.0 | 45.6 | 40.2 | ||||||||||||
North America Commercial Solutions | 4.0 | 5.0 | 10.3 | 14.5 | ||||||||||||
General Corporate Expense | (36.2 | ) | (30.7 | ) | (104.0 | ) | (80.7 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 132.1 | $ | 121.6 | $ | 393.8 | $ | 345.3 |
20 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As used herein, the terms Equifax, the Company, we, our and us refer to Equifax Inc., a Georgia corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a combined entity, except where it is clear that the terms mean only Equifax Inc.
All references to earnings per share data in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, or MD&A, are to diluted earnings per share, or EPS, unless otherwise noted. Diluted EPS is calculated to reflect the potential dilution that would occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and resulted in additional common shares outstanding.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We are a leading global provider of information solutions, employment and income verifications and human resources business process outsourcing services. We leverage some of the largest sources of consumer and commercial data, along with advanced analytics and proprietary technology, to create customized insights which enable our business customers to grow faster, more efficiently and more profitably, and to inform and empower consumers.
Businesses rely on us for consumer and business credit intelligence, credit portfolio management, fraud detection, decisioning technology, marketing tools, and human resources-related services. We also offer a portfolio of products that enable individual consumers to manage their financial affairs and protect their identity. Our revenue stream is diversified among individual consumers and among businesses across a wide range of industries and international geographies.
Segment and Geographic Information
Segments. The U.S. Consumer Information Solutions, or USCIS, segment, the largest of our five segments, consists of three product and service lines: Online Consumer Information Solutions, or OCIS; Mortgage Solutions; and Consumer Financial Marketing Services. OCIS and Mortgage Solutions revenue is principally transaction-based and is derived from our sales of products such as consumer credit reporting and scoring, mortgage settlement services, identity management, fraud detection and modeling services. USCIS also markets certain decisioning software services which facilitate and automate a variety of consumer credit-oriented decisions. Consumer Financial Marketing Services revenue is principally project- and subscription-based and is derived from our sales of batch credit and consumer wealth information such as those that assist clients in acquiring new customers, cross-selling to existing customers and managing portfolio risk.
The International segment consists of Canada Consumer, Europe and Latin America. Canada Consumer’s products and services are similar to our USCIS offerings, while Europe and Latin America are made up of varying mixes of product lines that are in our USCIS, North America Commercial Solutions and North America Personal Solutions reportable segments.
The Workforce Solutions segment consists of the Verification Services and Employer Services business lines. Verification Services revenue is transaction-based and is derived primarily from employment and income verification. Employer Services revenues are derived from our provision of certain human resources business process outsourcing services that include both transaction- and subscription-based product offerings. These services include unemployment claims management, employment-based tax credit services, complementary payroll-based transaction services, and the management of assessments of new hires.
North America Personal Solutions revenue is primarily subscription-based supplemented by some transaction-based services, and is derived from the sale of credit monitoring, debt management and identity theft protection products, which we deliver to consumers electronically via the internet.
North America Commercial Solutions revenue is principally transaction-based, with the remainder project-based, and is derived from the sale of business information, credit scores and portfolio analytics that enable customers to utilize our reports to make financing, marketing and purchasing decisions related to businesses. A portion of the information included in our services comes from an exclusive arrangement with the Small Business Financial Exchange (“SBFE”) for data for bank lending to small businesses. We are in the process of negotiating an extension of our agreement with the SBFE which will provide for non-exclusive use of the SBFE data through December 31, 2013. At this time, we do not expect our 2013 results to be impacted as a result of these events. We expect that over time the SBFE will also make this data available to additional information services companies.
21 |
Geographic Information. We currently operate in the following countries: Argentina, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, the Republic of Ireland, Spain, the U.K., Uruguay, and the U.S. Our operations in the Republic of Ireland focus on data handling and customer support activities. We have an investment in a consumer and commercial credit information company in Brazil and offer consumer credit services in India and Russia through joint ventures.
Key Performance Indicators. Management focuses on a variety of key indicators to monitor operating and financial performance. These performance indicators include operating revenue, change in operating revenue, operating income, operating margin, net income attributable to Equifax, diluted earnings per share, cash provided by operating activities and capital expenditures. The key performance indicators for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
Key Performance Indicators | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue | $ | 543.9 | $ | 490.4 | $ | 1,602.4 | $ | 1,450.1 | ||||||||
Operating revenue change | 11 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||
Operating income | $ | 132.1 | $ | 121.6 | $ | 393.8 | $ | 345.3 | ||||||||
Operating margin | 24.3 | % | 24.8 | % | 24.6 | % | 23.8 | % | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Equifax | $ | 77.9 | $ | 66.7 | $ | 225.8 | $ | 158.5 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Equifax | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.28 | ||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 151.7 | $ | 112.0 | $ | 352.1 | $ | 259.0 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 14.8 | $ | 15.3 | $ | 49.3 | $ | 59.2 |
Business Environment and Company Strategy
Consumer and small business lending activity is one of the key drivers of demand for our services. Lending activity has moderated in most loan categories and markets we serve around the world, as lenders continue to demonstrate caution in loan decisions due to continuing concerns about consumer and small business credit quality. Mortgage lending activity, which is an important lending category for our company, is cyclical, based on fluctuations in both home sales and refinancing activity. Mortgage activity associated with home sales remains below historical levels, in part due to depressed home values, while mortgage refinancing activity continues to be strong due to historically low interest rates. We expect mortgage refinancing activity to remain strong for the remainder of 2012. These market and economic trends affect both our USCIS and Workforce Solutions segments. Furthermore, new financial regulations have increased the compliance requirements and activities for many of our customers and will likely introduce new challenges as well as opportunities in the marketing of our products and services to our customers. Real time decision-making for many of our customers has become more complex and reliant on quality data assets with broader market coverage. Our proprietary technology is efficient and sufficiently flexible to adapt to a diverse range of decisioning applications. By linking data assets, we are able to develop high value solutions that improve the effectiveness of our customers’ decision-making activities. In an effort to respond to these market conditions, we have focused on the following activities:
- | Further diversification of our revenues by pursuing and investing in key strategic initiatives including new product innovation, differentiated decisioning solutions and analytics, leveraging and broadening our diverse data assets and enhancing our technology platforms. | |
- | Intensifying our sales force focus on key customer accounts and further developing our product offerings to address the needs of our medium-to-smaller customers. | |
- | Investing in expanding and enriching our analytical resources to enhance the quality and value of our decisioning solutions. | |
- | Acquiring new data assets and technologies both domestically and internationally. | |
- | Investing in attractive international markets, including Russia and India. | |
- | Continuing our focus on managing expenses through the use of LEAN and other process improvement initiatives. |
22 |
For the remainder of 2012, we expect a continuation of modest economic growth in most of our served markets. The environment will continue to be challenging as various countries deal with their particular political, fiscal, and economic issues. However, we continue to expect that our ongoing investments in new product innovation, enterprise growth initiatives, technology infrastructure, strategic acquisitions, and continuous process improvement will enable us, in a modestly growing economy, to deliver long term average organic revenue growth ranging between 6% and 8% with additional growth of 1% to 2% derived from strategic acquisitions. We also expect to grow earnings per share at a somewhat faster rate than revenue as a result of both operating and financial leverage. The diversity of our data assets, the strength of our analytical capabilities, and our proprietary decisioning technology has enabled us to consistently deliver high value solutions that our clients integrate into their business operations. As our clients' business environment becomes more difficult and competitive, these high value solutions will increasingly enable them to operate their businesses more efficiently and effectively.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—THREE AND NINE MONTHS SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND 2011
Consolidated Financial Results
Operating Revenue
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Operating Revenue | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions | $ | 233.3 | $ | 202.0 | $ | 31.3 | 15 | % | $ | 681.1 | $ | 577.0 | $ | 104.1 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
International | 121.0 | 118.6 | 2.4 | 2 | % | 361.5 | 376.6 | (15.1 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Workforce Solutions | 117.0 | 102.8 | 14.2 | 14 | % | 345.9 | 298.5 | 47.4 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
North America Personal Solutions | 51.4 | 45.5 | 5.9 | 13 | % | 151.6 | 135.1 | 16.5 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
North America Commercial Solutions | 21.2 | 21.5 | (0.3 | ) | -2 | % | 62.3 | 62.9 | (0.6 | ) | -1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating revenue | $ | 543.9 | $ | 490.4 | $ | 53.5 | 11 | % | $ | 1,602.4 | $ | 1,450.1 | $ | 152.3 | 11 | % |
Revenue increased by 11% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011. The deconsolidation of our Brazilian business, which resulted from the merger of our business into a larger entity during the second quarter of 2011, negatively impacted revenue growth by $35.4 million for the first nine months of 2012, compared to the prior year, while all other revenue increased by 13% in the first nine months compared to the same period in 2011. The growth in the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 was driven by strong execution of key strategic initiatives and the impact of increased mortgage refinancing activity in the U.S. The effect of foreign exchange rates, in locations other than Brazil, reduced revenue by $4.5 million in the third quarter and $13.4 million in the first nine months of 2012 compared to the year ago periods.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Operating Expenses | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated cost of services | $ | 208.5 | $ | 186.6 | $ | 21.9 | 12 | % | $ | 613.3 | $ | 567.3 | $ | 46.0 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses | 162.8 | 141.7 | 21.1 | 15 | % | 472.2 | 413.2 | 59.0 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense | 40.5 | 40.5 | - | 0 | % | 123.1 | 124.3 | (1.2 | ) | -1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating expenses | $ | 411.8 | $ | 368.8 | $ | 43.0 | 12 | % | $ | 1,208.6 | $ | 1,104.8 | $ | 103.8 | 9 | % |
The increase in cost of services, when compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, was due primarily to the impact of increased salary expense, direct production expenses and contract service expenses of $18.0 million for the third quarter and $60.1 million for the first nine months as well as smaller increases in other expenses to support revenue growth. The increase in expense for the first nine months of 2012 was partially offset by decreases related to the deconsolidation of our Brazilian business. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased our cost of services by $1.3 million for the third quarter and $3.9 million for the first nine months of 2012.
23 |
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $21.1 million in the third quarter compared to the year ago quarter. This increase included a $3.7 million severance charge related to restructuring in our International business unit. The remaining increase was primarily due to increased salary, contract service and incentive expenses of $13.2 million as well as higher marketing and other expenses. The $59.0 million increase for the first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to increased salary and incentive expense of $45.1 million, and higher marketing and professional services expenses, partially offset by decreases in expenses related to the deconsolidation of our Brazilian business. The impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased our selling, general and administrative expense by $1.1 million for the third quarter and $3.4 million for the first nine months of 2012.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the third quarter of 2012 was flat when compared to the same period in 2011. The slight decrease in depreciation and amortization expense in the first nine months of 2012 over the same nine month period in 2011, is primarily due to the decline in amortization of certain purchased intangibles acquired as part of the TALX acquisition in 2007 which fully amortized during the second quarter of 2011 and the amortization and depreciation decrease resulting from the deconsolidation of our Brazilian business. This decrease was partially offset in the first nine months of 2012 by our two 2011 acquisitions within Workforce Solutions that contributed $3.2 million of incremental depreciation and amortization expense.
Operating Income and Operating Margin
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Operating Income | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating revenue | $ | 543.9 | $ | 490.4 | $ | 53.5 | 11 | % | $ | 1,602.4 | $ | 1,450.1 | $ | 152.3 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating expenses | (411.8 | ) | (368.8 | ) | (43.0 | ) | 12 | % | (1,208.6 | ) | (1,104.8 | ) | (103.8 | ) | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 132.1 | $ | 121.6 | $ | 10.5 | 9 | % | $ | 393.8 | $ | 345.3 | $ | 48.5 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating margin | 24.3 | % | 24.8 | % | -0.5 | % pts | 24.6 | % | 23.8 | % | 0.8 | % pts |
In the third quarter of 2012, operating expenses increased at a slightly faster rate than revenue, and operating income increased at a slightly lower rate than revenue, due to $3.7 million of restructuring expenses in our International segment recorded during the third quarter of 2012 and the impact of higher corporate expenses, partially offset by improvements in margins in our USCIS and Workforce Solutions businesses. Operating income for the first nine months of 2012 increased faster than revenue and operating margins increased by 80 basis points in the first nine months of 2012 compared to the prior year periods due primarily to the deconsolidation of Brazil, which had negatively impacted company margins a year ago, and improvements in margins in our USCIS, Workforce Solutions and Personal Solutions businesses driven by revenue growth, partially offset by the impact of higher corporate expenses.
Other Expense, Net
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Other Expense, Net | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated interest expense | $ | 13.6 | $ | 13.7 | $ | (0.1 | ) | -1 | % | $ | 41.1 | $ | 41.2 | $ | (0.1 | ) | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated other (income) expense, net | (1.9 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (1.3 | ) | nm | (5.5 | ) | 8.7 | (14.2 | ) | nm | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated other expense, net | $ | 11.7 | $ | 13.1 | $ | (1.4 | ) | -12 | % | $ | 35.6 | $ | 49.9 | $ | (14.3 | ) | -29 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average cost of debt | 5.6 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated debt, net, at quarter end | $ | 968.3 | $ | 1,035.5 | $ | (67.2 | ) | -6 | % | $ | 968.3 | $ | 1,035.5 | $ | (67.2 | ) | -6 | % |
nm - not meaningful
Interest expense decreased slightly for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Our consolidated debt balance has decreased at September 30, 2012, as a result of less borrowings in the form of commercial paper, on which interest rates and accordingly interest expense are currently very low. As a result the average cost of debt for the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 increased slightly when compared to the same periods in 2011.
Other expense, net, for the three month period ending September 30, 2012, decreased $1.3 million as compared to the prior year period due to higher income from our minority investment in Russia.
24 |
Other expense, net, for the nine month period ending September 30, 2012, decreased $14.3 million, as compared to the prior year periods. The decrease is primarily due to the merger of our Brazilian business during the second quarter of 2011. On May 31, 2011, we completed the merger of our Brazilian business with Boa Vista Servicos S.A. (“BVS”), which was accounted for as a sale and deconsolidated, in exchange for a 15% equity interest in BVS (“the Brazilian Transaction”). We recorded a $10.3 million pre-tax loss on the Brazilian Transaction in other expense (income), net. Other expense, net, was also reduced in the nine month period by higher income from our minority investment in Russia.
Income Taxes
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Provision for Income Taxes | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated provision for income taxes | $ | 40.3 | $ | 39.2 | $ | 1.1 | 3 | % | $ | 125.6 | $ | 129.7 | $ | (4.1 | ) | -3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Effective income tax rate | 33.5 | % | 36.2 | % | 35.1 | % | 43.9 | % |
Our effective income tax rate was 33.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, down from 36.2% for the same period in 2011 due to lower foreign income taxes and the favorable impact of discrete tax items. The effective income tax rate was 35.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, down from 43.9% for the same period in 2011 with the decrease primarily due to the Brazilian Transaction. The impact of the Brazilian Transaction increased our effective rate 7.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The effective income tax rate on the Brazilian Transaction was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of tax impacts related to foreign currency changes for which we had not previously recorded tax expense because we have historically been permanently invested in Brazil with respect to foreign currency fluctuations. The nine month effective income tax rate also decreased due to the impact of lower foreign income taxes and the impact of discrete items.
Net Income
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Net Income | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) | (In millions, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 132.1 | $ | 121.6 | $ | 10.5 | 9 | % | $ | 393.8 | $ | 345.3 | $ | 48.5 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated other expense, net | (11.7 | ) | (13.1 | ) | 1.4 | -12 | % | (35.6 | ) | (49.9 | ) | 14.3 | -29 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated provision for income taxes | (40.3 | ) | (39.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 3 | % | (125.6 | ) | (129.7 | ) | 4.1 | -3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income | 80.1 | 69.3 | 10.8 | 16 | % | 232.6 | 165.7 | 66.9 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (2.2 | ) | (2.6 | ) | 0.4 | -17 | % | (6.8 | ) | (7.2 | ) | 0.4 | -6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Equifax | $ | 77.9 | $ | 66.7 | $ | 11.2 | 17 | % | $ | 225.8 | $ | 158.5 | $ | 67.3 | 43 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Equifax | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.10 | 18 | % | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 0.56 | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share | 122.2 | 123.3 | 122.4 | 124.2 |
Consolidated net income increased $10.8 million, or 16%, in the third quarter of 2012 due to higher operating income in three of our five business segments as compared to the third quarter of 2011. Consolidated net income increased $66.9 million, or 40%, in the first nine months of 2012 due to the $27.8 million loss recorded on the Brazilian Transaction (reflected in other expense and income tax expense) in 2011, along with higher operating income in four of our five business segments as compared to the same period in 2011.
25 |
Segment Financial Results
USCIS
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Consumer Information Solutions (OCIS) | $ | 156.6 | $ | 135.5 | $ | 21.1 | 16 | % | $ | 459.3 | $ | 383.3 | $ | 76.0 | 20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Solutions | 43.4 | 32.0 | 11.4 | 35 | % | 118.3 | 86.2 | 32.1 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Financial Marketing Services | 33.3 | 34.5 | (1.2 | ) | -4 | % | 103.5 | 107.5 | (4.0 | ) | -4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 233.3 | $ | 202.0 | $ | 31.3 | 15 | % | $ | 681.1 | $ | 577.0 | $ | 104.1 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
% of consolidated revenue | 43 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 86.1 | $ | 74.0 | $ | 12.1 | 16 | % | $ | 253.6 | $ | 206.5 | $ | 47.1 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 36.9 | % | 36.6 | % | 0.3 | % pts | 37.2 | % | 35.8 | % | 1.4 | % pts |
U.S. Consumer Information Solutions revenue increased 15% in the third quarter and 18% in the first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year periods. This strong growth includes the impact of a high level of mortgage activity as well as certain business initiatives implemented during 2011 and into 2012. As we anniversary certain of those initiatives and begin comparing to the fourth quarter of 2011 when mortgage activity was also strong, we expect to report lower growth rates than experienced in the first nine months of 2012.
OCIS
Revenue for the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 increased 16% and 20%, respectively, when compared to the prior year periods. These increases were primarily driven by a 5% and 10% increase in core credit decision transaction volume for the three and nine month periods, respectively. The rise in transaction volume is primarily due to increases in the mortgage industry as well as the automotive industry and our key client program which represents transactions with the larger banks. Revenue also benefitted from a shift in product mix to higher priced products and new products billed on a subscription basis.
Mortgage Solutions
Revenue increased 35% and 37% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the prior year periods due primarily to increased sales in core mortgage reporting services as a result of higher mortgage refinancings stimulated by historically low mortgage interest rates; the sale of newer mortgage information products which help lenders better manage risk; and growth in settlement services revenue as a result of the favorable market conditions and increased market share from existing customers.
Consumer Financial Marketing Services
Revenue decreased for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2012, as compared to 2011, due to a decline in project-based revenue and a decline in demand for wealth-based consumer information services due to reductions in their use for credit marketing by some large financial institutions. This decrease was partially offset in both periods by growth in traditional credit-based pre-screen revenue and in the nine month period by increased portfolio management revenue.
USCIS Operating Margin
USCIS operating margins increased 30 basis points to 36.9% in the third quarter of 2012 and 140 basis points to 37.2% in the first nine months of 2012 due to the benefits of strong revenue growth in a business with significant fixed costs.
26 |
International
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Latin America | $ | 46.7 | $ | 45.1 | $ | 1.6 | 4 | % | $ | 139.5 | $ | 164.3 | $ | (24.8 | ) | -15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Europe | 41.7 | 40.7 | 1.0 | 3 | % | 126.1 | 117.0 | 9.1 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada Consumer | 32.6 | 32.8 | (0.2 | ) | 0 | % | 95.9 | 95.3 | 0.6 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 121.0 | $ | 118.6 | $ | 2.4 | 2 | % | $ | 361.5 | $ | 376.6 | $ | (15.1 | ) | -4 | % | |||||||||||||||
% of consolidated revenue | 22 | % | 25 | % | 23 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 33.1 | $ | 34.7 | $ | (1.6 | ) | -5 | % | $ | 106.6 | $ | 98.7 | $ | 7.9 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 27.4 | % | 29.3 | % | -1.9 | % pts | 29.5 | % | 26.2 | % | 3.3 | % pts |
International revenue increased by 2% in the third quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. Local currency revenue increased 6% in the third quarter due to growth in certain Latin American countries and Europe. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted revenue by $4.4 million, or 4%.
International revenue decreased 4% in the nine month period, compared to the same period in 2011. While the deconsolidation of Brazil negatively impacted revenue by $35.4 million in the nine month period ending September 30, 2012, revenue in our other geographies increased by 6% in the nine month period as compared to 2011. Local currency revenue, excluding Brazil, increased 10% for the first nine months of 2012 due to solid growth in Europe and other Latin American countries. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar, excluding Brazil, negatively impacted our International revenue by $13.0 million, or 4%, in the first nine months of the year.
Latin America
Revenue increased by 4% in the third quarter as compared to the prior year period. In local currency, revenue growth was 9% driven by strong growth in Argentina, Uruguay and Ecuador slightly offset by a decline in Chile due to a regulatory changes in the allowable uses of credit information. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted revenue by $2.2 million, or 5%.
Revenue decreased by 15% in the first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year period. While the deconsolidation of Brazil negatively impacted revenue by $35.4 million in the first nine months of 2012, revenue in our other Latin American countries increased 8% in the first nine months of 2012 as compared to 2011. Local currency revenue, excluding Brazil, increased by 13% in the first nine months of 2012 due most particularly to strong growth in Argentina, Uruguay and Ecuador slightly offset by a small decline in Chile due to a regulatory change in allowable uses of credit reports. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar, excluding Brazil, negatively impacted revenue by $5.8 million, or 5%, in the first nine months of 2012 compared to a year ago.
Europe
Revenue increased 3% and 8% in the three and nine month periods, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011. In local currency, revenue growth was 7% in the third quarter and 12% in the first nine months of 2012 driven in both periods primarily by increased sales in most product segments offset partially by more challenging economic conditions. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted revenue by $1.6 million, or 4%, in the third quarter, and $4.8 million, or 4%, in the first nine months of 2012.
Canada Consumer
Local currency revenue increased 1% and 3% in the three and nine month periods, respectively, compared to the prior year periods in 2011 primarily due to increased volumes for our analytical services products. Local currency fluctuations against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted revenue by $0.5 million, or 1%, in the third quarter, and $2.4 million, or 2%, in the first nine months of 2012, resulting in flat reported nominal revenue in the third quarter and 1% growth year to date.
International Operating Margin
Operating margin decreased in the third quarter of 2012 as compared to 2011 due to $3.7 million of restructuring expenses incurred during 2012 to better align staff with our future needs. Operating margin increased for first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year periods primarily due to the deconsolidation of our Brazilian business, whose margins had declined in recent periods, slightly offset by the restructuring expenses in the third quarter of 2012.
27 |
Workforce Solutions
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Workforce Solutions | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verfication Services | $ | 68.8 | $ | 51.8 | $ | 17.0 | 33 | % | $ | 188.9 | $ | 137.6 | $ | 51.3 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Employer Services | 48.2 | 51.0 | (2.8 | ) | -5 | % | 157.0 | 160.9 | (3.9 | ) | -2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 117.0 | $ | 102.8 | $ | 14.2 | 14 | % | $ | 345.9 | $ | 298.5 | $ | 47.4 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
% of consolidated revenue | 22 | % | 21 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 28.6 | $ | 23.6 | $ | 5.0 | 21 | % | $ | 81.7 | $ | 66.1 | $ | 15.6 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 24.4 | % | 23.0 | % | 1.4 | % pts | 23.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 1.5 | % pts |
Verification Services
Revenue from Verification Services increased 33% and 37% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2012, respectively, compared to the prior year periods, due to 35% growth in both periods in mortgage-related verification revenue due to the strong level of mortgage refinancing activity during the third quarter and first nine months of 2012, 20% and 18% growth, respectively, in non-mortgage verification revenue, and the benefit of our third quarter 2011 acquisition of DataVision Resources. As we anniversary the DataVision Resources acquisition and begin comparing to the fourth quarter of 2011 when mortgage refinancing activity was also strong, growth in the last quarter of 2012 will likely trend down.
Employer Services
Revenue decreased in the third quarter and first nine months of 2012, as compared to the same periods in 2011. Revenue declined in our Tax Management Services business due to lower overall claims activity in our unemployment cost management business and, beginning in the third quarter, the delay in the renewal of the federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit program. Revenue also declined in our Talent Management Services business due to decreased government hiring activity. These declines were partially offset by growth achieved in our transaction-based complementary services.
Workforce Solutions Operating Margin
Operating margin for the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 increased as compared to the prior year period. The increase in margin was driven by the revenue growth during the quarter and year to date.
North America Personal Solutions
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America Personal Solutions | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 51.4 | $ | 45.5 | $ | 5.9 | 13 | % | $ | 151.6 | $ | 135.1 | $ | 16.5 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
% of consolidated revenue | 9 | % | 9 | % | 9 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 16.5 | $ | 15.0 | $ | 1.5 | 10 | % | $ | 45.6 | $ | 40.2 | $ | 5.4 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 32.1 | % | 32.8 | % | -0.7 | % pts | 30.1 | % | 29.7 | % | 0.4 | % pts |
Revenue increased 13% for the three month period and 12% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increased direct to consumer, Equifax-branded subscription service revenue which was up 13% in the third quarter and 16% in the first nine months of 2012. The increase was driven by higher average revenue per subscriber due to new product offerings and better market segmentation and to a lesser extent by higher subscription sales resulting in higher average subscriber counts. Operating margin decreased in the third quarter as compared to the prior year period due to an increase in marketing. Operating margin increased in first nine months of 2012, as compared to the prior year period, primarily due to higher revenue partially offset by an increase in marketing.
28 |
North America Commercial Solutions
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America Commercial Solutions | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating revenue | $ | 21.2 | $ | 21.5 | $ | (0.3 | ) | -2 | % | $ | 62.3 | $ | 62.9 | $ | (0.6 | ) | -1 | % | ||||||||||||||
% of consolidated revenue | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 4.0 | $ | 5.0 | $ | (1.0 | ) | -21 | % | $ | 10.3 | $ | 14.5 | $ | (4.2 | ) | -29 | % | ||||||||||||||
Operating margin | 18.8 | % | 23.6 | % | -4.8 | % pts | 16.6 | % | 23.1 | % | -6.5 | % pts |
Revenue decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, by 2% and 1%, respectively. In local currency, revenue decreased 1% for the third quarter of 2012 and was flat for the first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year periods. Transaction-based revenue serving credit risk needs of our customers, which represents approximately 60% of our revenue, grew 4% in the third quarter of 2012 and 5% in the first nine months of 2012 as compared to the prior year. This growth was more than offset by an 8% decline in the third quarter and a 7% decline in the first nine months of 2012 in project-oriented revenue as customers delayed or canceled certain small business marketing programs given the uncertain environment for small businesses. Operating margin decreased in the third quarter and first nine months of 2012 due to a slight revenue decline combined with a 4% and 7% increase, respectively, in operating expenses as the business continues to invest in its longer term strategy despite the current slowdown in demand for marketing services.
General Corporate Expense
Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Corporate Expense | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | 2012 | 2011 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | (Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General corporate expense | $ | 36.2 | $ | 30.7 | $ | 5.5 | 18 | % | $ | 104.0 | $ | 80.7 | $ | 23.3 | 29 | % |
Our general corporate expenses are unallocated costs that are incurred at the corporate level and include those expenses impacted by corporate direction, such as shared services, administrative, legal, restructuring, equity compensation costs, and the portion of management incentive compensation determined by total company earnings per share performance. General corporate expenses increased by $5.5 million and $23.3 million for the third quarter of 2012 and first nine months of 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2011, primarily due to increased incentive compensation due to stronger first nine months results than is our normal pattern, and increased investment in corporate infrastructure initiatives.
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Management assesses liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund operating, investing and financing activities. We continue to generate substantial cash from operating activities and remain in a strong financial position, with resources available for reinvestment in existing businesses, strategic acquisitions and managing our capital structure to meet short- and long-term objectives.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Funds generated by operating activities and our credit facilities continue to be our most significant sources of liquidity. We expect that funds generated from results of operations will be sufficient to finance our anticipated working capital and other cash requirements (such as capital expenditures, interest payments, potential pension funding contributions and dividend payments) for the foreseeable future. If borrowings were needed, we would expect to borrow in the commercial paper or corporate bond markets; or in the event that credit market conditions were to deteriorate, we would rely more heavily on borrowings from the Senior Credit Facility as described below. At September 30, 2012, $498.6 million was available to borrow under our Senior Credit Facility. Our Senior Credit Facility does not include a provision under which lenders could refuse to allow us to borrow under this facility in the event of a material adverse change in our financial condition, as long as we are in compliance with the covenants contained in the lending agreement.
29 |
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 352.1 | $ | 259.0 | $ | 93.1 | ||||||
Investing activities | $ | (57.8 | ) | $ | (173.1 | ) | $ | 115.3 | ||||
Financing activities | $ | (153.6 | ) | $ | (98.9 | ) | $ | (54.7 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $93.1 million over the prior year. Cash provided from net income, excluding the impact of the 2011 divestiture, increased $39.1 million. The remaining increase in cash from operations was driven primarily by changes in net working capital and other balance sheet changes, most notably a $48 million reduction in cash used in current liabilities, reflecting in part an increase in accrued salaries and incentives partially offset by a change in accrued taxes, including certain items related to the merger of our business in Brazil into BVS. The increase was also driven by $10 million pension contribution in the first quarter of 2011 that did not recur in 2012.
Fund Transfer Limitations. The ability of certain of our subsidiaries and associated companies to transfer funds to us is limited, in some cases, by certain restrictions imposed by foreign governments. These restrictions do not, individually or in the aggregate, materially limit our ability to service our indebtedness, meet our current obligations or pay dividends. We currently hold $142.1 million of cash in our foreign subsidiaries.
Investing Activities
Capital Expenditures
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | (49.3 | ) | $ | (59.2 | ) | $ | 9.9 |
Our capital expenditures are used for developing, enhancing and deploying new and existing software in support of our expanding product set, replacing or adding facilities and equipment, updating systems for regulatory compliance, the licensing of software applications and investing in system reliability, security and disaster recovery enhancements. Capital expenditures in 2011 were higher than 2012 primarily due to the purchase of a building in our Workforce Solutions segment during the first quarter of 2011.
30 |
Acquisitions, Divestitures and Investments
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | $ | (7.3 | ) | $ | (112.2 | ) | $ | 104.9 | ||||
Cash received from divestiture | $ | 2.5 | $ | 2.5 | $ | - | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates, net | $ | (3.7 | ) | $ | (4.2 | ) | $ | 0.5 |
During the third quarter of 2012, we completed a small acquisition in the Latin America region of our International segment. During the first nine months of 2011, we invested $112.2 million in acquisitions, net of cash acquired. Our largest acquisition was DataVision Resources, which provides data and business solutions to the mortgage, insurance and financial services industries and is now part of our Workforce Solutions segment. We acquired DataVision Resources for $50.0 million during the third quarter of 2011. We also completed smaller acquisitions of information services businesses in the European and Latin American regions of our International segment as well as our USCIS segment in 2011.
During the second quarter of 2010, we sold our APPRO product line, generating cash proceeds of approximately $67 million. Approximately $5 million of the purchase price was paid by the acquirer into an escrow account that released to us, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, over the two year period following the sale. We received $2.5 million from the escrow account in the second quarter of both 2012 and 2011.
During the first nine months of 2012, we invested $3.7 million in our joint venture in Russia compared to the first nine months of 2011 in which we invested $4.2 million in our joint ventures in India and Russia.
Financing Activities
Borrowings and Credit Facility Availability
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Net short-term repayments | $ | (28.1 | ) | $ | 46.5 | $ | (74.6 | ) | ||||
Payments on long-term debt | $ | (15.1 | ) | $ | (16.7 | ) | $ | 1.6 |
Credit Facility Availability
Our principal unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of banks, which we refer to as the Senior Credit Facility, permits us to borrow up to $500.0 million through February 2015. The Senior Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes. Availability of the Senior Credit Facility for borrowings is reduced by the outstanding face amount of any letters of credit issued under the facility and, pursuant to our existing Board of Directors authorization, by the outstanding principal amount of our commercial paper notes, or CP.
31 |
Our $500.0 million CP program has been established to allow for borrowing through the private placement of CP with maturities ranging from overnight to 397 days. We may use the proceeds of CP for general corporate purposes. The CP program is supported by our Senior Credit Facility and, pursuant to our existing Board of Directors authorization, the total amount of CP which may be issued is reduced by the amount of any outstanding borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under our Senior Credit Facility and CP program. At September 30, 2012, a total of $498.6 million was available under our Senior Credit Facility.
At September 30, 2012, 70% of our debt was fixed-rate debt and 30% was effectively variable-rate debt. Our variable-rate debt, consisting of our five-year senior notes due 2014 (against which we have executed interest rate swaps to convert interest expense from fixed rates to floating rates), generally bears interest based on a specified margin plus a base rate (LIBOR). The interest rates reset periodically, depending on the terms of the respective financing arrangements. At September 30, 2012, the interest rate on our variable-rate debt ranged from 2.2% to 2.3%.
Borrowing and Repayment Activity
Net short-term repayments primarily represent activity under our CP program. We primarily borrow under our CP program, when available.
The increase in net short-term repayments primarily reflects the net repayment of CP notes outstanding as of the end of 2011 during the first nine months of 2012.
The payments on long-term debt primarily reflect $15 million payments made in the second quarter of both 2012 and 2011 on our 7.34% Notes.
Debt Covenants. A downgrade in our credit ratings would increase the cost of borrowings under our CP program and credit facilities, and could limit or, in the case of a significant downgrade, preclude our ability to issue CP. Our outstanding indentures and comparable instruments also contain customary covenants including, for example, limits on the incurrence of secured debt and sale/leaseback transactions. In addition, our Senior Credit Facility requires us to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of not more than 3.5. Our leverage ratio was 1.42 at September 30, 2012. None of these covenants are considered restrictive to our operations and, as of September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
We do not have any credit rating triggers that would accelerate the maturity of a material amount of our outstanding debt; however, our 6.3% Senior Notes due 2017 and 7.0% Senior Notes due 2037 (together, the “Senior Notes”) contain change of control provisions. If we experience a change of control or publicly announce our intention to effect a change of control and the rating on the Senior Notes is lowered by each of Standard & Poor’s, or S&P, and Moody’s Investors Service, or Moody’s, below an investment grade rating within 60 days of such change of control or notice thereof, we will be required to offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.
For additional information about our debt, including the terms of our financing arrangements, basis for variable interest rates and debt covenants, see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
32 |
Equity Transactions
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock repurchases | $ | (85.1 | ) | $ | (75.2 | ) | $ | (9.9 | ) | |||
Dividends paid to Equifax shareholders | $ | (64.5 | ) | $ | (58.7 | ) | $ | (5.8 | ) | |||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | (5.6 | ) | $ | 3.7 | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | $ | 40.9 | $ | 12.9 | $ | 28.0 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.6 | $ | (0.4 | ) |
Sources and uses of cash related to equity during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
- | During the first nine months of 2012, we repurchased 1.9 million of our common shares on the open market for $85.1 million at an average price of $45.73 per share. During the first nine months of 2011, we repurchased 2.2 million of our common shares for $75.2 million at an average price of $33.07. At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $227.1 million remaining for stock repurchases under the existing Board authorization. | |
- | We increased our quarterly dividend from $0.16 per share previously to $0.18 per share as announced in the first quarter of 2012. Accordingly, our dividends per share were $0.54 and $0.48 per share for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We paid cash dividends to Equifax shareholders of $64.5 million and $58.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. | |
- | We received cash of $40.9 million and $12.9 million during the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, respectively, from the exercise of stock options. |
Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments and Other Contingencies
Our contractual obligations have not changed materially from those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K. For additional information about certain obligations and contingencies, including those related to Computer Sciences Corporation and the Brazilian Transaction, see Note 2 and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no material changes with respect to our off-balance sheet arrangements from those presented in our 2011 Form 10-K.
Related Party Transactions
We engage in various transactions and arrangements with related parties. We believe the terms of the transactions and arrangements do not differ from those that would have been negotiated with an independent party.
Benefit Plans
At December 31, 2011, our U.S. Retirement Income Plan, or USRIP, met or exceeded ERISA’s minimum funding requirements. In the future, we expect to make minimum funding contributions as required and may make discretionary contributions, depending on certain circumstances, including market conditions and our liquidity needs. We believe additional funding contributions, if any, would not prevent us from continuing to meet our liquidity needs, which are primarily funded from cash flows generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and our committed credit facilities.
33 |
For our non-U.S., tax-qualified retirement plans, we fund an amount sufficient to meet minimum funding requirements but no more than allowed as a tax deduction pursuant to applicable tax regulations. For our non-qualified supplementary retirement plans, we fund the benefits as they are paid to retired participants, but accrue the associated expense and liabilities in accordance with GAAP.
For additional information about our benefit plans, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
Seasonality
We experience seasonality in certain of our revenue streams. Revenue generated by the online consumer information services component of our USCIS operating segment are typically the lowest during the first quarter, when consumer lending activity is at a seasonal low. Revenue generated from the Employer Services business unit within the Workforce Solutions operating segment is generally higher in the first quarter due primarily to the provision of Form W-2 preparation services which occur in the first quarter each year. Revenue generated from our financial wealth asset products in Consumer Financial Marketing Services (CFMS) and from data management services in our North America Commercial business are generally higher in the fourth quarter each year due to the significant portion of our annual renewals which occur in the fourth quarter of each year.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For information about new accounting pronouncements and the potential impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 Form 10-K.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the Consolidated Financial Statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates and assumptions about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The “Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section in the MD&A, and Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in our 2011 Form 10-K describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. Although we believe that our estimates, assumptions and judgments are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.
Goodwill
We review goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment annually (as of September 30) and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance or trends, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit. We have ten reporting units comprised of Consumer Information Solutions (which includes part of Online Consumer Information Solutions, Mortgage Solutions and Consumer Financial Marketing Services), Identity Management (part of Online Consumer Information Solutions), Europe, Latin America, Canada Consumer, North America Personal Solutions, North America Commercial Solutions, Verification Services, Tax Management Services (part of Employer Services) and Talent Management Services (part of Employer Services).
34 |
The goodwill balance at September 30, 2012, for our ten reporting units was as follows:
September 30, | ||||
2012 | ||||
(In millions) | ||||
Consumer Information Solutions | $ | 583.9 | ||
ID Management | 54.5 | |||
Europe | 119.0 | |||
Latin America | 212.2 | |||
Canada Consumer | 31.4 | |||
North America Personal Solutions | 1.8 | |||
North America Commercial Solutions | 37.7 | |||
Verification Services | 738.9 | |||
Tax Management Services | 169.0 | |||
Talent Management Services | 26.1 | |||
Total goodwill | $ | 1,974.5 |
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment (the revised standard). The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a “qualitative” assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We performed the qualitative assessment for our Consumer Information Solutions, Latin America, Europe, Canada Consumer, North America Personal Solutions, and North America Commercial Solutions reporting units. In this qualitative assessment, we considered the following items for each of the reporting units: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, overall financial performance and other entity specific events. In addition, for each of these reporting units, the most recent fair value determination resulted in an amount that significantly exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting units. Based on these assessments, we determined the likelihood that a current fair value determination would be less than the current carrying amount of the reporting unit is not more likely than not. As a result of our conclusions, no further testing was required for these reporting units.
Valuation Techniques
In determining the fair value of our reporting units for which we performed a quantitative test, we used a combination of the income and market approaches to estimate the reporting unit’s business enterprise value.
Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on estimated future discounted cash flows which require assumptions about short and long-term revenue growth rates, operating margins for each reporting unit, discount rates, foreign currency exchange rates and estimates of capital charges. The assumptions we use are based on what we believe a hypothetical marketplace participant would use in estimating fair value. Under the market approach, we estimate the fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, for benchmark companies. We believe the benchmark companies used for each of the reporting units serve as an appropriate input for calculating a fair value for the reporting unit as those benchmark companies have similar risks, participate in similar markets, provide similar services for their customers and compete with us directly. The companies we use as benchmarks are principally outlined in our discussion of Competition in our 2011 Form 10-K. Data for the benchmark companies was obtained from publicly available information. ID Management has benchmark companies that conduct operations of businesses of a similar type, such as Experian Group Limited and Fair Isaac Corporation. Verification Services, Tax Management Services and Talent Management Services share a different set of benchmark companies, notably ADP and Paychex Inc., as the markets they serve are different than those served by our other reporting units. Valuation multiples were selected based on a financial benchmarking analysis that compared the reporting unit’s operating result with the comparable companies’ information. In addition to these financial considerations, qualitative factors such as variations in growth opportunities and overall risk among the benchmark companies were considered in the ultimate selection of the multiple.
35 |
The values separately derived from each of the income and market approach valuation techniques were used to develop an overall estimate of a reporting unit’s fair value. We use a consistent approach across all reporting units when considering the weight of the income and market approaches for calculating the fair value of each of our reporting units. This approach relies more heavily on the calculated fair value derived from the income approach, with 70% of the value coming from the income approach. We believe this approach is consistent with that of a market participant in valuing prospective purchase business combinations. The selection and weighting of the various fair value techniques may result in a higher or lower fair value. Judgment is applied in determining the weightings that are most representative of fair value.
We have not made any material changes to the valuation methodology we use to assess goodwill impairment since the date of the last annual impairment test.
Growth Assumptions
The assumptions for our future cash flows begin with our historical operating performance, the details of which are described in our Management’s Discussion & Analysis of operating performance. Additionally, we consider the impact that known economic, industry and market trends will have on our future forecasts, as well as the impact that we expect from planned business initiatives including new product initiatives, client service and retention standards, and cost management programs. At the end of the forecast period, the long-term growth rate we used to determine the terminal value of each reporting unit was generally 3% to 5% based on management’s assessment of the minimum expected terminal growth rate of each reporting unit, as well as broader economic considerations such as GDP, inflation and the maturity of the markets we serve.
We projected revenue growth in 2013 for our reporting units in completing our 2012 impairment testing based on planned business initiatives and prevailing trends exhibited by these units, such as demand for employment verification services and government hiring activity at the U.S. Transportation and Security Administration in Verification Services and Talent Management Services reporting units and not based on the assumption of meaningful economic recovery. Growth in the Talent Management Services reporting unit is also based on growth in the commercial sector of that business. The anticipated revenue growth in all of the reporting units, however, is partially offset by assumed increases in expenses for a majority of our reporting units which reflect the additional level of investment needed in order to achieve the planned revenue growth. Our 2012 long-term forecast is not dependent upon meaningful recovery of the global economy in the near term and we continue to take cost containment actions to help maintain operating margins for our reporting units.
Discount Rate Assumptions
We utilize a weighted average cost of capital, or WACC, in our impairment analysis that makes assumptions about the capital structure that we believe a market participant would make and include a risk premium based on an assessment of risks related to the projected cash flows of each reporting unit. We believe this approach yields a discount rate that is consistent with an implied rate of return that a market participant would require for an investment in a company having similar risks and business characteristics to the reporting unit being assessed. To calculate the WACC, the cost of equity and cost of debt are multiplied by the assumed capital structure of the reporting unit as compared to industry trends and relevant benchmark company structures. The cost of equity was computed using the Capital Asset Pricing Model which considers the risk-free interest rate, beta, equity risk premium and specific company risk premium related to a particular reporting unit. The cost of debt was computed using a benchmark rate and the Company’s tax rate. For the 2012 annual goodwill impairment evaluation, the discount rates used to develop the estimated fair value of the reporting units evaluated ranged from 9% to 12%. Because of assigned market premiums, discount rates are lowest for reporting units, whose cash flows are expected to be less volatile due to such factors as the maturity of the market they serve, their position in that market or other macroeconomic factors. Where there is the greatest volatility of cash flows due to competition, the discount rate selected is in the higher portion of the range as there is more inherent risk in the expected cash flows of that reporting unit.
Estimated Fair Value and Sensitivities
The estimated fair value of the reporting units whose fair value was calculated for purposes of the 2012 impairment testing is derived from the valuation techniques described above, incorporating the related projections and assumptions. An indication of possible impairment occurs when the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below the carrying value of its equity. The estimated fair value for all reporting units exceeded the carrying value of these units as of September 30, 2012. As a result, no goodwill impairment was recorded.
36 |
The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in these projections and assumptions; therefore, in some instances changes in these assumptions could impact whether the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying value. For example, an increase in the discount rate and decline in the projected cumulative cash flow of a reporting unit could cause the fair value of certain reporting units to be below its carrying value. We perform sensitivity analyses around these assumptions in order to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions and the resulting estimated fair values. Ultimately, future potential changes in these assumptions may impact the estimated fair value of a reporting unit and cause the fair value of the reporting unit to be below its carrying value. The excess of fair value over carrying value for the Company’s reporting units that were valued as of September 30, 2012, ranged from approximately 17% to 125%.
The reporting unit having the lowest absolute dollar excess of fair value over carrying value is our Talent Management Services business which has a goodwill balance of $26.1 million as of September 30, 2012. This reporting unit has been impacted by uncertainty in government hiring activity. While no impairment was noted in our impairment test as of September 30, 2012, if customer hiring activity does not increase in the near to medium term as forecasted, projected revenue growth for commercial customers does not materialize or if other events adversely impact the business drivers and corresponding assumptions used to value this reporting unit, there could be a change in the valuation of our goodwill in future periods and would likely result in the recognition of an impairment loss. Additionally, an increase in the discount rate due to outside factors or a decrease in the market multiples would likely result in an impairment.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in Part II, Item 7A of our 2011 Form 10-K. There were no material changes to our market risk exposure during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
37 |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Equifax, certain of its subsidiaries, and other persons have been named as parties in various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in connection with the operation of Equifax’s businesses. In most cases, plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief. These actions include the following:
California Bankruptcy Litigation. In consolidated actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, captioned Terri N. White, et al. v. Equifax Information Services LLC, Jose Hernandez v. Equifax Information Services LLC, Kathryn L. Pike v. Equifax Information Services LLC, and Jose L. Acosta, Jr., et al. v. Trans Union LLC, et al. , plaintiffs asserted that Equifax violated federal and state law (the FCRA, the California Credit Reporting Act and the California Unfair Competition Law) by failing to follow reasonable procedures to determine whether credit accounts are discharged in bankruptcy, including the method for updating the status of an account following a bankruptcy discharge. On August 20, 2008, the District Court approved a Settlement Agreement and Release providing for certain changes in the procedures used by defendants to record discharges in bankruptcy on consumer credit files. That settlement resolved claims for injunctive relief, but not plaintiffs’ claims for damages. On May 7, 2009, the District Court issued an order preliminarily approving an agreement to settle remaining class claims. The District Court subsequently deferred final approval of the settlement and required the settling parties to send a supplemental notice to those class members who filed a claim and objected to the settlement or opted out, with the cost for the re-notice to be deducted from the plaintiffs’ counsel fee award. Mailing of the supplemental notice was completed on February 15, 2011. The deadline for this group of settling plaintiffs to provide additional documentation to support their damage claims or to opt-out of the settlement was March 31, 2011. On July 15, 2011, following another approval hearing, the District Court approved the settlement. Several objecting plaintiffs subsequently filed notices of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which are currently pending.
Other. Equifax has been named as a defendant in various other legal actions, including administrative claims, class actions and other litigation arising in connection with our business. Some of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We believe we have strong defenses to, and where appropriate, will vigorously contest, many of these matters. Given the number of these matters, some are likely to result in adverse judgments, penalties, injunctions, fines or other relief. However, we do not believe that these litigation matters will be individually material to our financial condition or results of operations. We may explore potential settlements before a case is taken through trial because of the uncertainty and risks inherent in the litigation process.
For information regarding our accounting for legal contingencies, see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as supplemented below, which factors could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.
Security breaches and other disruptions to our information technology infrastructure could interfere with our operations, and could compromise Company, customer and consumer information, exposing us to liability which could cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of business, we rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including business-to-business and business-to-consumer electronic commerce and internal accounting and financial reporting systems. Additionally, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of our customers, employees, consumers and suppliers, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these networks and systems, and of the processing and maintenance of this information, is critical to our business operations and strategy.
38 |
Despite our substantial investment in security measures and business continuity plans, our information technology networks and infrastructure or those of our third party vendors and other service providers could be vulnerable to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to attacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events.
We are regularly the target of attempted cyber and other security threats and must continuously monitor and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact. Although we have not experienced any material breach of cybersecurity, if one or more of such events occur, this potentially could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could subject us to litigation, significant losses, regulatory fines, penalties or reputational damage, any of which could have a material effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations. Our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur. Also, our third party insurance coverage will vary from time to time in both type and amount depending on availability, cost and our decisions with respect to risk retention.
Our customers and we are subject to various current governmental regulations, and could be affected by new laws or regulations, compliance with which may cause us to incur significant expenses, and if we fail to maintain satisfactory compliance with certain regulations, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
Our businesses are subject to various significant international, federal, state and local regulations, including but not limited to privacy and consumer data protection, health and safety, tax, labor and environmental regulations. These regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. We may be required to incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations or to remedy violations of these regulations. Any failure by us to comply with applicable government regulations could also result in cessation of our operations or portions of our operations or impositions of fines and restrictions on our ability to carry on or expand our operations. In addition, because many of our products are regulated or sold into regulated industries, we must comply with additional regulations in marketing our products.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted in 2010 to broadly reform practices in the financial services industry. Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act established a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, or CFPB, to protect consumers from abusive financial services practices. The CFPB will have authority to write rules impacting the business of credit reporting companies, including the Company, and also to supervise, conduct examinations of, and enforce compliance as to federal consumer financial protections laws and regulations, with respect to certain “non-depository covered persons” determined by the CFPB to be “larger participants” that offer consumer financial products and services. On July 16, 2012, the CFPB issued a final rule that includes our credit reporting agency under the CFPB nonbank supervision program. The first examinations of credit reporting firms will begin in the fourth quarter of this year. These laws and regulations (as well as actions that may be taken by legislatures and regulatory bodies in other countries) could limit our ability to pursue business opportunities we might otherwise consider engaging in, impose additional costs on us, result in significant loss of revenue, impact the value of assets we hold, or otherwise significantly adversely affect our business.
As in the United States, legislation regarding the availability or use of consumer and commercial data has been, and continues to be, proposed from time to time in various foreign countries in which we have operations, most notably in certain Latin American and European Union countries. These proposals have in some cases had the potential to expand the availability or uses of information and in other cases had the potential to restrict the availability or use of information we currently maintain. Accordingly, such possible regulatory action could either increase or decrease our potential revenue and profits.
We derive a portion of our revenue from direct and indirect sales to U.S., state, local and foreign governments and their respective agencies. Such contracts are subject to various procurement laws and regulations, and contract provisions relating to their formation, administration and performance. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations or provisions in our government contracts could result in the imposition of various civil and criminal penalties, termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, or suspension of future government contracting. If our government contracts are terminated, if we are suspended from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our business could suffer.
39 |
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table contains information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Equifax or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during our third quarter ended September 30, 2012:
Maximum Number | ||||||||||||||||
(or Approximate | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number | Dollar Value) | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average | of Shares Purchased | of Shares that May | |||||||||||||
Number | Price | as Part of | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid | Publicly-Announced | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased (1) | Per Share (2) | Plans or Programs | Programs (3) | ||||||||||||
June 1 - June 30, 2012 | $ | 260,986,179 | ||||||||||||||
July 1 - July 31, 2012 | 899 | $ | - | - | $ | 260,986,179 | ||||||||||
August 1 - August 31, 2012 | 582,378 | $ | 46.38 | 580,000 | $ | 234,085,779 | ||||||||||
September 1 - September 30, 2012 | 151,800 | $ | 46.26 | 151,800 | $ | 227,063,511 | ||||||||||
Total | 735,077 | $ | 46.35 | 731,800 | $ | 227,063,511 |
(1) | The total number of shares purchased for the quarter includes shares surrendered, or deemed surrendered, in satisfaction of the exercise price and/or to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of employee stock options, totaling 899 shares for the month of July 2012, 2,378 shares for the month of August 2012, and no shares for the month of September 2012. |
(2) | Average price paid per share for shares purchased as part of our share repurchase program (includes brokerage commissions). |
(3) | On May 3, 2012, our Board of Directors increased the amounts authorized under the program by $200 million, and we publicly announced the increase on May 3, 2012. At September 30, 2012, the amount authorized for future share repurchases under the share repurchase program was $227.1 million. The program does not have a stated expiration date. |
40 |
Dividend and Share Repurchase Restrictions
Our Senior Credit Facility restricts our ability to pay cash dividends on our capital stock or repurchase capital stock if a default or event of default exists or would result, according to the terms of the credit agreement.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
41 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Equifax Inc. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
Date: October 25, 2012 | By: | /s/ Richard F. Smith |
Richard F. Smith | ||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
Date: October 25, 2012 | /s/ Lee Adrean | |
Lee Adrean | ||
Corporate Vice President and | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) | ||
Date: October 25, 2012 | /s/ Nuala M. King | |
Nuala M. King | ||
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller | ||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
42 |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
43 |