NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
Arrayit Corporation (the “Company” or “Arrayit”) is a Nevada “C” Corporation that entered into the life sciences industry in 1996. Arrayit is a leading edge developer, manufacturer and marketer of next-generation life science tools and integrated systems for the large-scale analysis of genetic variation, biological function and diagnostics. Using Arrayit’s proprietary and patented technologies, the Company provides a comprehensive line of products and services that currently serve the sequencing, genotyping, gene expression and protein analysis markets, and the Company expects to enter the market for manufacturing molecular diagnostics.
Arrayit has earned respect as a leader in the health care and life sciences industries with its proven expertise in three key areas: the development and support of microarray tools and components, custom printing and analysis of microarrays for research, and the identification and development of diagnostic microarrays and tools for early detection of treatable disease states. As a result, Arrayit has provided tools and services to thousands of the leading genomic research centers, pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, clinical research organizations, government agencies and biotechnology companies worldwide.
Arrayit has a December 31 year end.
Arrayit’s principal office is in Sunnyvale, California. Arrayit presently has nine employees.
Interim financial statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in Arrayit’s Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K/A. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the consolidated financial statements, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2013 as reported in Form 10-K/A, have been omitted.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The following includes a description of subsidiaries and percentage ownership at June 30, 2014:
Subsidiary
|
|
Date of Incorporation
|
|
Business of Entity
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TeleChem International, Inc.
|
|
November 1, 1993
|
|
Import, export, manufacturing and distribution of wholesale industrial chemicals
|
|
100% owned by Arrayit Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrayit Marketing Inc.
|
|
September 3, 2008
|
|
Inactive
|
|
100% owned by Arrayit Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrayit Scientific Solutions, Inc.
|
|
October 15, 2009
|
|
Markets a test for Parkinson’s Disease incorporating the technology and equipment developed by Arrayit Corporation
|
|
98% owned by Arrayit Corporation and 2% owned by the former President of Arrayit Scientific Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
|
|
June 2, 2009
|
|
Markets a test for Ovarian Cancer incorporating the technology and equipment developed by Arrayit Corporation
|
|
37.28% owned by Arrayit Corporation at June 30, 2014
|
The Company had previously consolidated the financial statements of Avant Diagnostics, Inc. as a majority owned subsidiary and this is reflected in the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. On December 31, 2012, Avant Diagnostics, Inc. issued additional shares of its common stock which reduced the Company’s ownership interest in Avant Diagnostics, Inc. so that the Company no longer had a controlling financial interest. In accordance with FASB ASC 810-10-40, “Deconsolidation of a Subsidiary or Derecognition of a Group of Assets”, as of December 31, 2012, the Company deconsolidated its majority ownership interest and recognized a non-cash, net gain on the transaction. Thus, the Company’s June 30, 2014 unaudited financial statements do not include the effect of the financial statements of Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
In July 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock with a market price of $0.12 per share or $60,000 to settle debt of Avant Diagnostics, Inc. Arrayit Corporation was the guarantor of the debt. The Company recorded a charge of $38,962 on the transaction and received equipment from Avant Diagnostics, Inc. valued at $21,038.
In March 2014, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common shares of its common stock with a market price of $0.14 per share or $74,142 to settle additional debt of Avant Diagnostics, Inc. Arrayit Corporation was the guarantor of the debt. The Company recorded a charge of $74,142 on the transaction.
On December 12, 2011, Arrayit Corporation signed an Agreement and Plan of Distribution with its subsidiary, Avant Diagnostics, Inc., whereby 19,350,000 shares of common stock of Avant Diagnostics (37.28% of the total outstanding) owned by Arrayit Corporation will be distributed rateably to the shareholders of Arrayit Corporation on the record date which will occur upon approval by the SEC of the Form S-1 registration statement to be submitted by Avant Diagnostics, Inc.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Financial Reporting:
The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues and expenses are reported on the accrual basis, which means that income is recognized as it is earned and expenses are recognized as they are incurred. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost determined on the basis of FIFO. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Management acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company's system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.
Non-Controlling Interest:
The Company accounts for the non-controlling interest in its subsidiaries under ASC 810-10-45-16, Non-controlling Interest in a Subsidiary. This standard defines a non-controlling interest, previously called a minority interest, as the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The standard requires, among other items, that a non-controlling interest be included in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity separate from the parent's equity; consolidated net income to be reported at amounts inclusive of both the parent's and non-controlling interest’s shares and, separately, the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and non-controlling interest all on the consolidated statement of operations; and if a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary be measured at fair value and a gain or loss be recognized in net income based on such fair value. Additionally, the standard defines a non-controlling interest as a financial instrument issued by a subsidiary that is classified as equity in the subsidiary's financial statements. A financial instrument issued by a subsidiary that is classified as a liability in the subsidiary's financial statements based on the guidance in other standards is not a controlling interest because it is not an ownership interest.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of 2018. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on its financial statements.
The Company has reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and does not believe the future adoption of any such pronouncements may be expected to cause a material impact on its financial condition or the results of its operations.
Income/Loss per Common and Common Equivalent Share
The computation of basic income/loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year plus common stock equivalents, which would arise from their exercise using the if-converted or treasury stock methods, and the average market price per share during the year. The Company determined that the effect of common stock equivalents (Stock Options, Stock Warrants and convertible Series “A” and “C” Preferred Shares) outstanding at June 30, 2014 should be excluded from diluted earnings per common share for the three months and for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s diluted earnings per share calculation excludes approximately 30 million potential shares for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has large working capital deficits and accumulated deficits. At June 30, 2014, Arrayit had a working capital deficit of $6,013,183, and an accumulated deficit of $25,105,863. The Company currently devotes a significant amount of its resources on developing clinical protein biomarker diagnostic products and services, and it does not expect to generate substantial revenue until certain diagnostic tests are cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration and commercialized. Management believes that current available resources will not be sufficient to fund the Company’s planned expenditures, including past due payroll tax payments, as well as estimated penalties and interest, over the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to continue to meet its obligations and to achieve its business objectives is dependent upon, among other things, raising additional capital or generating sufficient revenue in excess of costs. At such time as the Company requires additional funding, the Company will seek to raise such additional funding from various possible sources, including its parent company, the public equity market, private financings, sales of assets, collaborative arrangements and debt. If the Company raises additional capital through the issuance of equity securities or securities convertible into equity, stockholders will experience dilution, and such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of common stock or convertible senior notes. If the Company raises additional funds by issuing debt, the Company may be subject to limitations on its operations, through debt covenants or other restrictions. If the Company obtains additional funds through arrangements with collaborators or strategic partners, the Company may be required to relinquish its rights to certain technologies or products that it might otherwise seek to retain. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional funds, or raise them on acceptable terms. If the Company is unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms, it may be unable to execute its business plan, the Company could be required to delay or reduce the scope of its operations, and the Company may not be able to pay off its obligations, if and when they come due.
These factors create substantial doubt about Arrayit’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded assets and liabilities or other adjustments that may be necessary should the Company not be able to continue as a going concern.
The ability of Arrayit to continue as a going concern is dependent on Arrayit generating cash from the sale of its common stock or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations. Management's plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and ongoing operations; however, there can be no assurance Arrayit will be successful in these efforts.
NOTE 4 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are shown net of an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. As more fully explained in Note 5 below, accounts receivable has been reduced by Accounts Receivable loans sold with recourse.
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
Gross accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
2,118,559 |
|
|
$ |
627,269 |
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,677,000 |
) |
|
|
(115,000 |
) |
Loan value of receivables sold with recourse (see Note 5)
|
|
|
(151,218 |
) |
|
|
(110,802 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
290,341 |
|
|
$ |
401,467 |
|
Accounts receivable include $1,550,000 from Avant Diagnostics, which is 37.28% owned by Arrayit. An allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,550,000 was established at June 30, 2014 against the Avant Diagnostics receivable.
NOTE 5 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SOLD WITH RECOURSE
Pursuant to an agreement dated July 5, 2007 and renewed on September 10, 2013, the Company has sold some of its Accounts Receivable to a financial institution with full recourse. The financial institution retains a 15% portion of the proceeds from the receivable sales as reserves, which are released to the Company as the Receivables are collected. The maximum commitment under this facility is $450,000, and is limited to receivables that are less than 31 days outstanding. The facility bears interest at 16% at June 30, 2014, and is secured by an unconditional guarantee of the Company and a first charge against the Accounts Receivable. At June 30, 2014, the balance outstanding under the recourse contracts was $151,218 net of a hold back reserve of $206,113 (December 31, 2013, $110,802 net of a hold back reserve of $113,788). Because of the Company’s credit policies, repossession losses and refunds in the event of default have not been significant and losses under the present recourse obligations are not expected to be significant, it is at least reasonably possible that the Company’s estimate will change within the near term.
NOTE 6 – FIXED ASSETS
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
Fixed Assets – Cost
|
|
$ |
465,041 |
|
|
$ |
327,648 |
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
(269,383 |
) |
|
|
(249,163 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
195,658 |
|
|
$ |
78,485 |
|
Depreciation expense totalled $20,220 and $Nil, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
NOTE 7 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, consisted of the following:
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Vendors
|
|
$ |
1,456,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,028,943 |
|
Professional Advisors
|
|
|
2,524,234 |
|
|
|
2,738,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accounts Payable
|
|
|
3,981,162 |
|
|
|
3,767,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and applicable taxes, plus estimated penalties and interest
|
|
|
1,804,936 |
|
|
|
1,704,468 |
|
Judgment interest
|
|
|
129,981 |
|
|
|
181,481 |
|
Other
|
|
|
176,828 |
|
|
|
174,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accrued Liabilities
|
|
|
2,111,745 |
|
|
|
2,060,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$ |
6,092,907 |
|
|
$ |
5,828,229 |
|
NOTE 8 – DEBT
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 10%, which was due August 10, 2010 and is now past due, secured by 1,000,000 shares out of the Company's common stock, pledged to the private lender without compensation by the Company's Chairman.
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Notes payable, interest at 8%, unsecured due on demand from Arrayit creditors
|
|
|
27,423 |
|
|
|
26,117 |
|
Notes payable, interest at rates varying from 8% to 10%, unsecured due on demand from Officers and Directors, their families and other shareholders
|
|
|
496,086 |
|
|
|
491,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, including related parties
|
|
$ |
773,509 |
|
|
$ |
768,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Short term debt
|
|
$ |
773,509 |
|
|
$ |
768,001 |
|
NOTE 9 – WARRANTS AND OPTIONS
The following table summarizes options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2014:
|
|
Number of Options and Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 |
|
|
5,116,154 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Expired
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
|
5,116,154 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
NOTE 10 – ROYALTY OBLIGATIONS
The Parkinson’s Institute – ARRAYIT SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.
Pursuant to an agreement dated February 9, 2009 between the Company, and The Parkinson's Institute, a California Corporation, Arrayit Scientific Solutions, Inc. is obligated to make payments, of 5% of gross earnings generated from Research derived from the biological specimens from Parkinson's disease patients and control patients provided by the Parkinson's Institute.
There were no revenues generated during the fiscal period ended June 30, 2014 and hence no obligation to pay any royalties to the Parkinson’s Institute.
NOTE 11 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company adopted ASC 718 and ASC 505, "Share-Based Payment", to account for its stock options and similar equity instruments issued. Accordingly, compensation costs attributable to stock options or similar equity instruments granted are measured at the fair value at the grant date, and expensed over the expected vesting period. ASC 718 and ASC 505 requires excess tax benefits be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid.
Operations for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 include $Nil of stock-based compensation, arising from the granting of no unregistered common shares, respectively.
NOTE 12 – CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
Convertible Preferred Stock
The Series A Preferred Stock has no stated dividend rate and has a liquidation preference of $.001 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock also has voting rights that entitle the preferred shareholders to vote with the common shareholders as if the preferred stock had converted to common. Both the conversion ratio of the preferred into common (9.6:1) and the number of shares outstanding is subject to revision upon reverse stock dividends or splits that reduce the total shares outstanding.
The Series C Preferred Stock has no stated dividend rate. The Series C Preferred Stock also has voting rights that entitle the preferred shareholders to vote with the common shareholders as if the preferred stock had converted to common. The conversion ratio of the preferred into common is not subject to revision upon reverse stock dividends or splits that reduce the total shares outstanding. The 103,143 Series C Preferred Stock was issued on February 21, 2008. These Series C Preferred shares are convertible into 36,100,000 common shares at the rate of 350:1. On August 15, 2008 the articles of designation for the Series C Preferred Stock were amended to limit the conversion to common shares to 10% of the holders’ original holdings in any quarter. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 there were no conversions.
NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
TOTAL ARRAYIT CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
Preferred Series A
|
|
|
Preferred Series C
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2013
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
87,145 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
38,139,616 |
|
|
$ |
37,948 |
|
|
$ |
19,054,387 |
|
|
$ |
(24,697,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,605,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for cash
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
136,365 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
59,864 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for services
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
192,834 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
29,592 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for settlement of legal suit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
63,750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
63,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of share for guarantee of Avant debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
73,642 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
74,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for debt conversion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
459,433 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
67,667 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
68,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net(loss) for the period ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(408,380 |
) |
|
|
(408,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2014
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
87,145 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
39,518,248 |
|
|
$ |
39,327 |
|
|
$ |
19,348,902 |
|
|
$ |
(25,105,863 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,717,525 |
) |
NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES
At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards available to offset future taxable income of approximately $24 million. The utilization of the NOL carry-forwards is dependent upon the tax laws in effect at the time the NOL carry-forwards can be utilized. It is likely that utilization of the NOL carry-forwards are limited based on changes in control. A valuation allowance of approximately $9.0 million and $9.0 million has been recorded against the deferred tax asset as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The NOL carry-forwards will fully expire in 2033.
NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Long Term Lease Commitments
The Company leases its office facility in Sunnyvale, California under operating leases that expire December 31, 2020.
Future minimum lease payments are as follows:
The Company leases its office facility in Sunnyvale, California under operating leases that expire December 31, 2020.
2014
|
|
$ |
117,000 |
|
2015
|
|
|
241,020 |
|
2016
|
|
|
227,568 |
|
2017
|
|
|
234,388 |
|
2018
|
|
|
263,364 |
|
2019
|
|
|
271,272 |
|
2020
|
|
|
279,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,634,020 |
|
Rent expense was $149,623 and $73,554 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 16, 2014 the Company issued 83,333 shares for services of $12,500.
On August 6, 2014 Arrayit Corp. and Avant Diagnostics reached an agreement to settle their lawsuit which provides inter alia:
●
|
Mutual releases between the two companies and a full release of Crucible Capital.
|
●
|
Rene Schena and Dr. Mark Schena will join Avant Diagnostics Board of Directors.
|
●
|
Arrayit Corporation retains the exclusive right to manufacture OvaDx® and Avant Diagnostics retains the exclusive right to sell OvaDx® on FDA approval.
|
●
|
Avant Diagnostics will provide funding to facilitate FDA approval for the OvaDx® diagnostic test.
|
●
|
Avant Diagnostics will issue ten million (10,000,000) shares of Avant Diagnostics to Arrayit Corporation as full settlement for the $1,550,000 invoice issued by Arrayit Corporation to Avant Diagnostics on June 20, 2014.
|
●
|
Arrayit Corporation will dividend ten million (10,000,000) shares of Avant Diagnostics to the Arrayit Corporation shareholders.
|
●
|
Avant Diagnostics and Arrayit Corporation each agree to issue ten million (10,000,000) shares of their common stock to the other company.
|
●
|
Arrayit Corporation will recover the exclusive right to sell the OvaDx® diagnostic test on FDA approval upon issuance of ten million (10,000,000) shares of Arrayit Corporation to Avant Diagnostics should Avant Diagnostics not become a publicly traded company within one year.
|
On January 13, 2014, Plaintiff Tamarin Lindenberg sued Arrayit Corporation, Arrayit Diagnostics, Inc., Avant Diagnostics, Inc, John Howell, Steven Scott and Gregg Linn in Civil Action No. L7698-13. Plaintiff alleged violations of the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act NJSA 34:19-1 to NJSA 34:19-8 (“CEPA”), breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, economic duress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. On February 10, 2014, Arrayit Corporation requested the removal of the State Action from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Arrayit Corporation’s counsel requested that Plaintiff’s counsel dismiss Arrayit Corporation as a defendant in this matter stating there is no basis against Arrayit Corporation for the purported claim under CEPA just as there is no viable CEPA claim against any of the other non-controlling, minority shareholders (e.g. Plaintiff); Plaintiff and Arrayit Corporation are not parties to any contractual agreements; there is no viable legal theory for ‘indirect breach’; Arrayit Corporation did not engage in any conduct, actions, communications or dealings with Plaintiff giving rise the purported claims against AC for alleged “economic duress,” “intentional infliction of emotional distress” or “tortious interference”; there is no good faith basis in law or fact for any of the claims attempted against Arrayit Corporation. Arrayit Corporation reserves all rights and specifically reserves all of its rights under FRCP Rule 11. On August 6, 2014 the United States District Court, District of New Jersey granted Arrayit Corp’s motion to dismiss and further ruled that leave to amend would not be granted.
On August 11, 2014, Plaintiff Reuben Taub sued Defendants Rene Schena, Mark Schena, Todd Martinsky and John Does 1-10 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 652454/2014. The nature of the action is loss of plaintiff’s investment in Arrayit Corporation which was induced by, inter alia, defendants’ fraud and failure to properly disclose withholding and other tax liabilities of the Company and misrepresentations concerning the development costs for, and the Company’s ownership interest in OvaDx®. Relief sought is monetary damages of $500,000 plus interest costs and disbursements and attorney’s fees as permitted by law. Rene Schena, Mark Schena and Todd Martinsky deny all of the allegations. The parties are working toward settlement.
For a description of our significant accounting policies and an understanding of the significant factors that influenced our performance during the six months ended June 30, 2014, this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements, including the related notes, appearing in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, as well as the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013. The preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results reported in the future will not differ from those estimates or that revisions of these estimates may not become necessary in the future.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, includes statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements are often characterized by the terms "may," "believes," "projects," "expects," or "anticipates," and do not reflect historical facts. Specific forward-looking statements contained in this portion of the Annual Report include, but are not limited to the Company's (i) expectation that certain of its liabilities listed on the balance sheet under the headings "Accounts Payable," "Accrued Liabilities" and "Note Payable" will be retired by issuing stock versus cash during the next 24 months; (ii) expectation that it will continue to devote capital resources to fund continued development of the Arrayit technology; (iii) anticipation that it will incur significant capital expenditures to further its deployment of the Arrayit offerings; and (iv) anticipation of a significant increase in operational and SG&A costs as it accelerates the development and marketing of the Arrayit operations.
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those to be identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 in the section titled “Risk Factors,” as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but may exist in the future.
In addition, the foregoing factors may generally affect our business, results of operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Operating Results –Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Gross revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1,949,195 and $602,672, respectively, representing a 223% increase in gross revenues for the period. The increase in sales was a result of Arrayit Corporation invoicing Avant Diagnostics, Inc. $1,550,000 in June 2014 for work it performed toward FDA approval of OvaDx®. The backlog of orders for the period ending June 30, 2014 is approximately $634,000 and the backlog of orders was approximately $285,000 for the period ending June 30, 2013.
The cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $271,921 and $376,896, respectively resulting in gross profit for the period of $127,274 and $225,776, respectively. The Company’s cost of sales is dependent upon product mix. During the second quarter of 2014, the gross margin was 32% versus 37% for the first quarter of 2013. The Company sold more commodity chemicals in the second quarter of 2013, which have a lower gross margin percentage than the microarray manufacturing instruments and consumables that were sold in the second quarter ended June 30, 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $2,014,985 and $239,382, respectively. The increase of $1,775,603 was due to increase in occupancy costs as the new premises have double the square footage of the prior location, increase in the cost of health insurance provided to employees, increase in payroll and consulting fees resulting from the addition of new employees and consultants, offset by reduction in insurance costs. Also, the Company established a $1,550,000 allowance for doubtful accounts against the June 2014 invoice to Avant Diagnostics and the related bad debt expense of $1,550,000 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Legal expenses of $30,379 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 were attributable to the costs of defending litigation with Avant, ReCap and Tamarin Lindenberg, as well as patent maintenance and general corporate matters. Legal expenses of $7,692 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were mostly attributable to litigation with Baker Hughes against our subsidiary TeleChem International, Inc. and Arrayit Corporation and to patent maintenance expenses.
Net loss from operations was $414,440 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared with a net loss from operations of $22,513 for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in net operating loss is due primarily to the decrease in gross revenues and the increase in selling, general and administrative costs.
Interest expense was $32,248 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $73,739 for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The reduction in interest costs is attributable to the absence of any judgement settlements during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and the reduction of funds borrowed to finance our working capital.
Comparison of Operating Results –Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Gross revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $3,039,899 and $1,545,588, respectively, representing a 97% increase in gross revenues for the period. The increase in sales was a result of Arrayit Corporation invoicing Avant Diagnostics, Inc. $1,550,000 in June 2014 for work it performed toward FDA approval of OvaDx®.
The cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2014 were $980,753 and $832,408, respectively resulting in gross profit for the period of $509,146 and $713,180, respectively. The Company’s cost of sales is dependent upon product mix. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the gross margin was 34% versus 46% for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $2,668,861 and $489,902, respectively. The increase of $2,178,959 was due to increase in occupancy costs as the new premises have double the square footage of the prior location, increase in the cost of health insurance provided to employees, increase in payroll and consulting fees resulting from the addition of new employees and consultants, increased marketing costs, offset by reduction in insurance costs. Also, the Company established a $1,550,000 allowance for doubtful accounts against the June 2014 invoice to Avant Diagnostics, Inc and the related bad debt expense of $1,550,000 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Legal expenses of $77,567 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 were attributable to the costs of defending litigation with Avant, ReCap and Tamarin Lindenberg, as well as patent maintenance and general corporate matters. Legal expenses of $37,907 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were mostly attributable to litigation with Baker Hughes against our subsidiary TeleChem International, Inc. and Arrayit Corporation, litigation with Recap Marketing and Consulting LLP, and to patent maintenance expenses.
Net loss from operations was $740,580 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared with net income from operations was $184,156 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in net operating loss is due primarily to the decrease in gross margins from revenues due to a change in product mix and the increase in selling, general and administrative costs.
Interest expense was $59,794 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $191,953 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The reduction in interest costs is attributable to the absence of any judgement settlements during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the reduction of funds borrowed to finance our working capital. Other income for the six months ended June 30 includes a gain on extinguishment of liabilities of $391,994 whereas other income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 includes gain on extinguishment of liabilities of $165,534 and bad debt recovery of $5,312.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows used in operations were $174,660 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and cash flows used in operations were $92,627 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2014, we had a working capital deficiency of $6,013,183 and an accumulated deficit of $25,105,863. The working capital deficiency, in addition to amounts payable in the normal course of business, is primarily attributable to accrued legal expenses, deferred compensation, and judgment interest.
At June 30, 2014, the Company had no commitments, understandings or arrangements for additional working capital. We estimate that we may require approximately $2 million over the next twelve (12) months to meet our expenses and to expand current operations to meet customer demands for our products and services. We may require additional funds over the next eighteen (18) months to assist in realizing our business objectives and for continuing research and development. The amount and timing of additional funds required will be dependent on a variety of factors and cannot be determined at this time. The Company has been successful in paying its operating costs and funding its development from operations supplemented by short-term borrowings from officers and third parties. We cannot be certain that we will be able to raise any additional capital to fund our ongoing operations.
Even if we cannot raise additional capital, we believe that we will be able to continue operations for the next 12 months, based on the funding currently provided and revenues that we anticipate generating in the near future. Our investors should assume that any additional funding may cause substantial dilution to current stockholders. In addition, we may not be able to raise additional funds on favorable terms, if at all.
Source of Liquidity
During the third quarter of 2013, Arrayit Corporation raised $1 million of working capital from a group of accredited investors. The sale and issuance of the securities discussed above were determined to be exempt from registration in reliance on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, Arrayit Corporation raised $1,146,000 of working capital from a group of accredited investors. The sale and issuance of the securities discussed above were determined to be exempt from registration in reliance on Rule 506(b) of Regulation D.
We are not aware of any other events or uncertainties that have a material impact upon our short-term or long-term liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We use words such as anticipate, believe, plan, expect, future, intend and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements. You should not place too much reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with an objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls also are designed with an objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, in order to allow timely consideration regarding required disclosures.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls by our chief executive officer, who is also our acting chief financial officer, included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, the operation of the controls, and the effect of the controls on the information presented in this Quarterly Report. Our management, including our chief executive officer, does not expect that disclosure controls can or will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud, if any. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Also, projections of any evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures to future periods are subject to the risk that the disclosure controls and procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on this review and evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, and subject to the inherent limitations all as described above, our chief executive officer, who is also our acting chief financial officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) contain material weaknesses and are not effective.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
The material weaknesses we have identified are the direct result of a lack of adequate staffing in our accounting department. Currently, our chief executive officer and a controller have sole responsibility for receipts and disbursements. We do not employ any other parties to prepare the periodic financial statements and public filings. Reliance on these limited resources impairs our ability to provide for a proper segregation of duties and the ability to ensure consistently complete and accurate financial reporting, as well as disclosure controls and procedures. As we grow, and as resources permit, we project that we will hire such additional competent financial personnel to assist in the segregation of duties with respect to financial reporting, and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 compliance. Notwithstanding these material weaknesses, management believes that the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, result of operations and cash flows for the periods presented
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter.
On March 13, 2013, Plaintiffs Recap Marketing and Consulting LLP sued Defendants Arrayit Corporation in Fort Bend County Texas Case No. 13-DCV-204747 for breach of contract with regard to warrants to purchase common stock. Recap seeks damages or specific performance, exemplary damages, costs of court and reasonable attorney’s fees. On April 16, 2013, the Company’s counsel submitted an unopposed motion to transfer venue to Harris County Texas and, subject to the motion to transfer venue, original answer denying the allegations and offered the affirmative defences of failure of condition precedent and expiration of contract, estoppel, failure of consideration and waiver, and in the alternative that the number of shares is incorrect. The parties attended a voluntary mediation conference on September 18, 2013, but were unable to reach a settlement agreement. The case is currently scheduled for trial on January 5, 2015.
Sanders Ortoli Vaughn-Flam Rosenstadt LLP vs Arrayit Corporation, Case # 653313/13. A law firm sued Arrayit for breach of contract regarding payment for services rendered. The parties reached a settlement on February 26, 2014.
On January 13, 2014, Plaintiff Tamarin Lindenberg sued Arrayit Corporation, Arrayit Diagnostics, Inc., Avant Diagnostics, Inc, John Howell, Steven Scott and Gregg Linn in Civil Action No. L7698-13. Plaintiff alleged violations of the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act NJSA 34:19-1 to NJSA 34:19-8 (“CEPA”), breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, economic duress and intentional infliction of emotional distress. On August 6, 2014 the United States District Court, District of New Jersey granted Arrayit Corporation’s motion to dismiss and further ruled that leave to amend would not be granted.
On March 31, 2014, Avant Diagnostics, Inc. sued Arrayit Corporation and Crucible Capital Group, Inc. in The Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, Case No. CV2014-092882. Avant alleged breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, tortious interference with business expectancy, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, declaratory judgment, conversion, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel. Arrayit Corporation denied all allegations. The parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation on August 8, 2014.
On August 11, 2014, Plaintiff Reuben Taub sued Defendants Rene Schena, Mark Schena, Todd Martinsky and John Does 1-10 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 652454/2014. The nature of the action is loss of plaintiffs investment in Arrayit Corporation which was induced by, inter alia, defendants fraud and failure to properly disclose withholding and other tax liabilities of the Company and misrepresentations concerning the development costs for, and the Companys ownership interest in OvaDx. Relief sought is monetary damages of $500,000 plus interest costs and disbursements and attorneys fees as permitted by law. Rene Schena, Mark Schena and Todd Martinsky deny all of the allegations. The parties are working toward settlement.
There are no other legal proceedings, although we may, from time to time, be party to certain legal proceedings and other various claims and lawsuits in the normal course of our business, which, in the opinion of management, are not material to our business or financial condition.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
On July 17, 2014 we issued 83,333 shares of common stock to consultants the total value of the services were $12,500. The value of the shares was based on the most recent share price of common stock issued for cash to non-related parties ($0.15 per share).
Management believes the above shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended.