Edgar Filing: Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc.

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-51974

BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

850 Stephenson Highway, Suite 310, Troy, Michigan 90265

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(310) 887-6391

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Non-accelerated filer	¨
Accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at February 17, 2015
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share		260,983

BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014

INDEX

		Page
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12
Item 3.	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk		17
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		17

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION			19

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		19
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		19
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		19
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure		19
Item 5.	Other information		19
Item 6.	Exhibits		20

SIGNATURES			21

Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Information included in this Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Baying Ecological Holding Group, Inc. (the “Company”), to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that these projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Actual results of the Company could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Except as required by applicable laws, the Company has no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.

Baying Ecological Holding Group, Inc.

Balance Sheets

	December 31,			June 30,
	2014			2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	-
Total Current Assets		-			-
Other Assets
Interest in Oil and Gas Properties		-			-
	$	-		$	-

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued Expenses	$	-		$	9,485

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	$	-		$	9,485

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.001, Authorized - 75,000,000 $0.001 par value common shares Issued 260,983 as of December 31, 2014 and as of June 30, 2014		261			261
Additional paid-in capital		782,630			774,630
Retained Earnings (Deficit)		(782,891	)		(784,376	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		-			(9,485	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY	$	-		$	-

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

Baying Ecological Holding Group, Inc.

Statements of Operations

	Three Months ended						Six Months ended
	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
OPERATING EXPENSES
Regulatory and transfer agent fees		-			-
Management Fees		3,000			3,000			6,000			6,000
Professional Fees		-			10,000						10,000
Rent		1,000			1,000			2,000			2,000
Amortization		-			-			-
Impairment Charge		-			-			-
Bank Charges and Interest		-			-			-
Total Operating Expenses		4,000			14,000			8,000			18,000

Loss before other		(4,000	)		(14,000	)		(8,000	)		(18,000	)

OTHER: Forgiveness Income		9,485			-			9.485

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	5,485		$	(14,000	)	$	1,485			(18,000	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE	$	0.02		$	(0.09	)	$	0.01		$	(0.11	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES		260.983			160.950			260,983			160,950

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

Baying Ecological Holding Group, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

	Six Months Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	1,485		$	(18,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Amortization Expense		-			-
Expense charged to Contributed Surplus		8,000			8,000
Debts charged to Contributed Surplus		-			-
Shares for services					10,000
Forgiveness of Debt		(9,485	)		-
Shares issued for Properties		-			-
Increase (decrease) in
Accrued Expenses		-			-
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities		-			-

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in Franchise		-			-
Investment in Oil and Gas Properties		-			-
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Investing Activities		-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of Capital Stock for cash		-			-
Note payable		-			-
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities		-			--
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		-			-
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Beginning		-			-
Ending	$	-		$	-
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Stock issued for properties	$	-		$	-
Stock issued for services	$	-		$	10,000
Debt forgiveness to Contributed Surplus	$	-		$	-

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING Group, Inc.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Baying Ecological Holdings, Inc was formerly Toro Ventures Inc which. was incorporated on 11 April 2005, under the laws of the State of Nevada. The company changed its name on January 9, 2014 to better reflect its new business direction, of a holding company eventually with various entities being managed.

The Company’s accounting year end is June 30.

The Company originally in the exploration of oil and gas properties is largely inactive.

Reverse Stock Split

On January 9, 2014 the Company effectuated a 1 to 100 reverse stock split. The financial statements have been presented for all periods to reflect this split.

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2014 have been prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred significant losses and has no assets.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include estimated useful lives and potential impairment of property and equipment, estimate of fair value of share based payments and derivative instruments and recorded debt discount, valuation of deferred tax assets and valuation of in-kind contribution of services and interest.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Net Loss per Share

Net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period as defined by Financial Accounting Standards, ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding.

Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Revenue Recognition

The Company will recognize revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC No. 605, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company applies the accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements”, as well as certain related FASB staff positions. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from m selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact business and considers assumptions that marketplace participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for measurements of fair value as follows:

	·	Level 1 - quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

	·	Level 2 - inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

	·	Level 3 - unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company's financial instruments consist of accounts payable.. The carrying amount of the Company's financial instruments approximates their fair value as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Stock-Based Compensation - Non Employees

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

	·	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

	·	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

	·	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

	·	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”. The update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and Uncertainties (Topic 275) to illustrate one way that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information about the risks and uncertainties related to the company’s current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity-which may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has an interest in a company in the development stage. The update is effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, including interim periods therein. Early application with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (Public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). The Company adopted this pronouncement for the six months ended December 31, 2014.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation ( Topic 718 ); Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

The Company has charged to expense with a corresponding credit to paid in capital cost of donated services of its officer which were $3,000 per quarter for management fees and $1,000 per quarter for rent.

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Authorized

75,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001.

Shares Issued

On June 10, 2013 the Company issued 100,000 post split shares valued at market which was determined to be par value as the company’s shares are extremely thinly traded and the company has not raised capital for over six years.

On April 24, 2014 100,033 shares were issued to the new founder valued at par.

NOTE 6 – FORGIVENESS OF DEBT

During the quarter a vendor forgave their professional fees of $9,485.

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing date of these financial statements and has disclosed that there is no such event that are material to the financial statements to be disclosed.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

In this report, unless the context requires otherwise, references to the "Company", "Baying Ecological", "we", "us" and "our" are to Baying Ecological Holding Group, Inc.

CORPORATE HISTORY

We were incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on April 11, 2005 under the name Toro Ventures Inc. We were initially in the fast food services industry. In accordance with the terms and provisions of that certain stock purchase agreement dated December 31, 2013 (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") between Joe Arcaro, seller of control block of restricted shares of common stock of the Company and our sole officer and director ("Arcaro") and The World Financial Holdings Group Co., Ltd., purchaser of the control block of shares of ("World Financial"), there was a change in our control. Arcarco tendered his resignation as the sole member of the Board of Directors and our President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer effective February 7, 2014. Effective February 7, 2014, the Board of Directors simultaneously appointed (i) Zhouping Jiao as the sole member of the Board of Directors and as the President/Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and (ii) Yuehong Yan as our Secretary. In light of the upcoming new business operations, effective May 1, 2014, Zhouping Jiao resigned as the sole member of the Board of Directors and as our President/Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and Yuehong Yan resigned as our Secretary. Simultaneously, the Board of Directors effective May 1, 2014 appointed Parsh Patel as the sole member of the Board of Directors and as our President/Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer.

Effective January 9, 2014, our Board of Directors and the majority shareholders approved an amendment to the articles of incorporation to change our name from "Toro Ventures Inc." to "Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc." (the “Name Change Amendment”). The Amendment was filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on January 23, 2014 changing our name to "Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc." (the "Name Change"). The Name Change was effected to better reflect our future business operations. We filed appropriate documents with FINRA to effect the Name Change. FINRA declared an effective date of February 7, 2014 for the Name Change. Our trading symbol changed to "BYIN". The new cusip number for the Company is 07278X107. The Name Change was effected to better reflect our future business operations.

On January 9, 2014, our Board of Directors and majority shareholders approved a reverse stock split of one for one for one hundred (1:100) of our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the “Stock Split”) and the Name Change. Pursuant to our Bylaws and the Nevada Revised Statutes, a vote by the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding votes is required to effect the Stock Split and the Name Change. Our articles of incorporation do not authorize cumulative voting. As of the record date of January 9, 2014, we had 26,095,000 voting shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The consenting stockholders of the shares of common stock are entitled to 20,000,000 votes, which represents approximately 76.64% of the voting rights associated with our shares of common stock. The consenting stockholders voted in favor of the Stock Split and the Name Change described herein in a unanimous written consent dated January 9, 2014. The Stock Split was effected based upon the filing of appropriate documentation with FINRA. The Stock Split decreased our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock from approximately 26,095,000 shares to 260,950 shares of common stock. The common stock will continue to be $0.001 par value.

OUR BUSINESS

New management believes that agriculture is one of the fastest growing investment areas of the 21^st century and is posturing the Company to embark on building an industry leading presence as one of China’s walnut conglomerates. Based on management's research, management further believes that in order to capitalize on the growth potential of the walnut market, we will need to revolutionize the industry by building a large scale, all-inclusive, standardized industrial chain. Management intends to achieve this goal by fully utilizing a strong technical force and cultural awareness and heritage to build a strong marketing plan and achieve peak brand operational capability.

Management has been identifying and seeking potential corporate partnerships with the Yangling Modern Agricultural Standardization Institute, which provides an array of technical support for us, as well as Shaanxi Yuanwangda Venture Capital Co., Ltd. in an effort to continue our operational plans. We have been researching an industry-wide chain of production standards for China’s entire walnut industry to full realize the development potential that will lead the industry. We intend to incorporate national policy regulations into every step of our business as well as eco-friendly, yet markedly efficient, methods to ensure the very best product is available to our consumers, while also securing the appropriate profit margins for our investors.

As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have met the following milestones to prepare ourselves for complete self-sufficiency and dominance throughout the walnut industry:

	·	Successful cultivation of large-scale, eco-efficient walnut reserves (including seed bases and harvesting techniques)

	·	Independent development of a specialized compound, biological fertilizer that fights the most common forms of walnut disease and create a barrier to prevent future infection

	·	Acquisition and retention of a top-tier production management team to ensure continued success and growth

We offer a high quality, new to market brand that encompasses expertly grafted walnut breeds including the American red spike-shaped walnut and premier fragrant walnuts. We have a focus on providing all of our customers with the absolute pinnacle of walnut perfection while also offering our VIPs the ecologically sound, organic products that are in such high demand with our upper-level clientele.

We provide the following products and services:

No.	Items	Individual Membership	Corporate Membership
	Pre-paid consumer credit（RMB）	100--10,000	1,000--20,000
1	Sales	Pre-paid to enjoy double discount
2	Discount for special products	15% off if paid by cash	Double discount for corporate credit card
3	Discount for consuming in the Club	15% off if paid by cash	Double discount for corporate credit card
4	Discount for normal products	10% off if paid by cash	Double discount for corporate credit card
5	Service fee for group buying	1%--3%
6	A variety of free workshop	20 hours in total
7	Annual fruit-picking	Not limited
8	Group trips	Yes

As special incentives to our long-term clients we are prepared to offer the following programs through our retail location, the Baying Precious and Delicious Food Club:

	·	Rechargeable Membership Cards: We will offer a discount to our members that choose to pre-pay for their products using a membership card system.

	·	Special Products: Working in tandem with our cooperative business partners, we will be ready to offer our customers unique products only available through our collaboration.

	·	Glamorous VIP Reception Center: At our physical location we will feature a VIP tasting experience within our established reception center. Our members will have an opportunity to host guests as they enjoy sampling our offerings at a discount.

	·	Superior Offerings: With a focus on providing our clients with the very best walnuts and related products, we are committed to producing only the finest ecologically sound, organic products for our VIPs.

	·	Group Discount Purchasing: Our VIPs will have the opportunity to purchase products as a group, thereby taking advantage of a bulk discount.

	·	Personal and Professional Development Opportunities: The Fine and Delicious Food Club will be offering free lectures to our clients so as to expand their knowledge base about nutritional and dietary options, health related topics, finance and investment opportunities, as well as classic Chinese cultural studies.

	·	Group Enrichment Trips and Annual Fruit Picking Opportunities: The agricultural hubs of the Baying Company are made available to our VIPs in an effort to offer true transparency to our top clients. We will also be offering group trips, organized with both leisure and education in mind, as well as a family-friendly annual fruit picking trip that will cultivate not only an appreciation of the richness of our products, but also a holistic approach to a family’s health and nutrition.

The Baying Precious & Delicious Food Club was an idea that has allowed us to directly reach our customers as we market our products to them. Specializing in selling high-quality and organic fruits, vegetables, cereals, and precious oils, we believe that this aspect of our corporate strategy will be a strong solidifiers of profit and top-of-mind presence. In the end, the Club has nearly infinite profit making applications and as of now we are capitalizing on these: (i) membership card sales; (ii) direct profits from product sales; (iii) cooperation base supply; (iv) public media advertising revenue; and (v) website and periodical advertisement income.

We also intend on applying for and accepting subsidies from the following national organizations/branches of government to enrich our products and our production standards: (i) Department of Commerce: ‘Rural Construction Development’ project which is designed to assist companies with operations in rural areas who help serve local populations; (ii) Ministry of Agriculture: where the government provides subsidies for the construction of pollution-free base and food deep-processing factories countrywide; (iii) Development and Reform Commission: subsidies from government for agricultural machinery equipment; (iv) The Provincial Labor Union; and(v) funds from SME Promotion Bureau.

As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we have offices located in Troy Michigan and in China on the 6th Floor of Huihao Building, off of 3rd Keji Road, in the heart of Xi’an city.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussions are based on our consolidated financial statements, including our subsidiaries. These charts and discussions summarize our financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, and notes thereto, included with our most recent Form 10-K for fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

SUMMARY COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS*

	Six Month Period ended December 31,
	2014			2013
Operating Expenses	$	8,000		$	18,000
Other		9,485			-0-
Net Income (Loss)		1,485			(18,000	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share		(0.01	)		(0.11	)

Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2013.

Our net profit for the six month period ended December 31, 2014 was $1,485 compared to a net loss of ($18,000) during the six month period ended December 31, 2013. We did not generate any revenues during the six month periods ended December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013, respectively.

During the six month period ended December 31, 2014, we incurred operating expenses of $8,000 (2013: $18,000). These operating expenses incurred during the six month period ended December 31, 2014 consisted of: (i) management fees of $6,000 (2013: $6,000); (ii) professional fees of $-0- (2013: $10,000); and (iii) rent of $2,000 (2013: $2,000).

Thus, our operating loss during the six month period ended December 31, 2014 was $8,000 compared to $18,000 during the six month period ended December 31, 2013.

During the six month period ended December 31, 2014, we recorded forgiveness in income of $9,485 (2013: $-0-).

Therefore, our net profit was $1,485 or $0.01 for the six month period ended December 31, 2014 compared to a net loss of ($18,000) or ($0.11) during the six month period ended December 31, 2013. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 260,983 for the six month period ended December 31, 2014 compared to 160,950 for the six month period ended December 31, 2013.

Three Month Period Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Three Month Period Ended December 31, 2013.

Our net profit for the three month period ended December 31, 2014 was $5,845 compared to a net loss of ($14,000) during the three month period ended December 31, 2013. We did not generate any revenues during the three month periods ended December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013, respectively.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2014, we incurred operating expenses of $4,000 (2013: $14,000). These operating expenses incurred during the three month period ended December 31, 2014 consisted of: (i) management fees of $3,000 (2013: $3,000); (ii) professional fees of $-0- (2013: $10,000); and (iii) rent of $1,000 (2013: $2,000).

Thus, our operating loss during the three month period ended December 31, 2014 was $4,000 compared to $14,000 during the three month period ended December 31, 2013.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2014, we recorded forgiveness income of $9,485 (2013: $-0-).

Therefore, our net profit was $5,485 or $0.02 for the three month period ended December 31, 2014 compared to a net loss of ($14,000) or ($0.09) during the three month period ended December 31, 2013. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 260,983 for the three month period ended December 31, 2014 compared to 160,950 for the three month period ended December 31, 2013.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2014

As at the six month period ended December 31, 2014, our current assets were $-0- and our current liabilities were $-0-, which resulted in a working capital deficit of $-0-. As at fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, our current assets were $-0- and our current liabilities were $9,485. The decrease in current liabilities of $9,485 was due to the forgiveness in income of $9,485.

Stockholders’ deficit decreased from ($9,485) for fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 to $-0- for six month period ended December 31, 2014.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

We have not generated positive cash flows from operating activities. For the six month periods ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, net cash flows used in operating activities was $-0- During the six month period ended December 31, 2014, net cash flows used in operating activities consisted primarily of a net profit of $1,485 (2013: ($18,000)), which was partially adjusted by (i) $8,000 (2013: $8,000) in expense charged to contributed surplus; (ii) ($,9485) (2013: $-0-) in forgiveness of debt; and (iii) $-0- (2013: $10,000) in shares issued for services.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

For the six month periods ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, net cash flows used in investing activities was $-0-, respectively.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

We intend to finance our operations primarily from debt or the issuance of equity instruments. For the six month periods ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, net cash flows provided from financing activities was $-0-, respectively.

PLAN OF OPERATION AND FUNDING

We have incurred losses for the past two fiscal years and had a net loss of $26,000 at fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Management intends to finance our 2014/2015 operations primarily with the potential revenue from walnut product sales and any cash short falls will be addressed through equity or debt financing, if available. We will need to raise additional capital, both internally and externally, to cover cash shortfalls and to compete in our markets. Management believes we will require an additional $1,200,000 in equity financing during the next 12 months to satisfy our cash requirements for operations and to facilitate our business plan.

These operating costs include cost of sales, general and administrative expenses, salaries and benefits and professional fees related to contracting personnel. If we cannot obtain financing to fund our operations in 2015, then we may be required to reduce our expenses and scale back our operations.

Going Concern

If we cannot obtain financing or generate sufficient revenue to fund our operations in 2015, then we may be required to reduce our expenses and scale back our operations. These factors raise substantial doubt of our ability to continue as a going concern. Footnote 2 to our financial statements provides additional explanation of Management’s views on our status as a going concern. The audited financial statements contained in this Annual Report do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability of assets or the amounts of liabilities that may result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Our independent registered accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph June 30, 2014, in their reports on the accompanying financial statements for June 30, 2014 regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide this information.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-11 Income Taxes (Topic 740) Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carry-forward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carry-forward Exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carry-forward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carry-forward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. This Update applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry-forward exists at the reporting date. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities , which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

We have implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and we do not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 30, 2014. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting for our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over our financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)	pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairy reflect our transactions.

(2)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

(3)	provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error or circumvention through collusion of improper overriding of controls. Therefore, even those internal control systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSD) in Internal-Control-Integrated Framework and implemented a process to monitor and assess both the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls. Based on this assessment, management believes that as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

We have instituted a remediation plan which involves reeducating our management, the accounting staff, and the administrative staff as to the elements of a completed sale. We increased the oversight of the process by increasing the frequency of involvement of outside accounting consultants. Internal systems are being put into place to track and document significant dates, such as delivery, installation and customer acceptance. In addition, the bookkeeping system has been modified so that all sales of extended warranties are automatically recorded as deferred revenue and that the amount of revenue that is ultimately recognized as warranty revenue is as the result of an analysis of the significant aspects of the warranty such as coverage and period.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the second quarter of 2014. In connection with such evaluation, there have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred since the beginning of our second quarter of 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. While there have been no changes, we have assessed our internal controls as being deficient and will be taking steps during 2015 to remedy such deficiencies.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-Q:

Exhibit
Number		Description

(3)		(i) Articles of Incorporation; and (ii) Bylaws

3.1		Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed on August 15, 2005).

3.2		Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed on August 15, 2005).

(10)		Material Contracts

10.1		Master Franchise Agreement (incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed on August 15, 2005).

10.2		Turnkey Agreement between our Company and Nitro Petroleum, Inc. (incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008).

10.3		Employment Agreement between Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc. (incorporated by reference from Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2014).

(14)		Code of Ethics

14.1		Code of Ethics (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on September 26, 2008).

(31)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1*		Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(32)		Section 1350 Certifications

32.1*		Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

________________

* Filed herewith.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP INC.

Date: February 17, 2015	By:	/s/ Parsh Patel
		Parsh Patel
		President/Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer)