Edgar Filing: AeroVironment Inc

avav_Current_Folio_10Q

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended October 28, 2017

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-33261

AEROVIRONMENT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		95-2705790
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

800 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 210
Monrovia, California		91016
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(626) 357-9983

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐		Accelerated filer ☒

Non-accelerated filer ☐		Smaller reporting company ☐
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
		Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of November 28, 2017, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, was 23,870,182.

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Table of Contents


Item 1.	Financial Statements :
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 28, 2017 (Unaudited) and April 30, 2017	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 (Unaudited) and October 29, 2016 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 (Unaudited) and October 29, 2016 (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended October 28, 2017 (Unaudited) and October 29, 2016 (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	28
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	28
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	28
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	28
Item 5.	Other Information	28
Item 6.	Exhibits	29
Signatures		30
Exhibit Index

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands except share and per share data)


	October 28,		April 30,
	2017		2017
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	117,109	$	79,904
Short-term investments		110,751		119,971
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,201 at October 28, 2017 and $291 at April 30, 2017		35,106		74,361
Unbilled receivables and retentions		13,494		14,120
Inventories, net		76,039		60,076
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		5,175		5,653
Total current assets		357,674		354,085
Long-term investments		33,024		42,096
Property and equipment, net		21,614		19,220
Deferred income taxes		16,113		15,089
Other assets		838		2,010
Total assets	$	429,263	$	432,500
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	15,724	$	20,283
Wages and related accruals		10,415		12,966
Income taxes payable		350		1,418
Customer advances		3,921		3,317
Other current liabilities		7,441		10,079
Total current liabilities		37,851		48,063
Deferred rent		1,637		1,719
Capital lease obligations - net of current portion		50		161
Other non-current liabilities		184		184
Deferred tax liability		67		116
Liability for uncertain tax positions		64		64
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value:
Authorized shares—10,000,000; none issued or outstanding at October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017		—		—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value:
Authorized shares—100,000,000
Issued and outstanding shares—23,865,335 shares at October 28, 2017 and 23,630,419 at April 30, 2017		2		2
Additional paid-in capital		166,993		162,150
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(98)		(127)
Retained earnings		222,504		219,929
Total AeroVironment stockholders' equity		389,401		381,954
Noncontrolling interest		9		239
Total equity		389,410		382,193
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	429,263	$	432,500

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In thousands except share and per share data)


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,		October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Revenue:
Product sales	$	52,933	$	29,350	$	84,024	$	45,087
Contract services		20,894		20,766		33,567		41,247
		73,827		50,116		117,591		86,334
Cost of sales:
Product sales		30,014		19,197		54,231		34,419
Contract services		12,813		13,502		20,730		27,815
		42,827		32,699		74,961		62,234
Gross margin:
Product sales		22,919		10,153		29,793		10,668
Contract services		8,081		7,264		12,837		13,432
		31,000		17,417		42,630		24,100
Selling, general and administrative		14,464		13,387		27,795		27,050
Research and development		7,272		8,517		13,733		17,117
Income (loss) from operations		9,264		(4,487)		1,102		(20,067)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net		432		397		944		772
Other expense, net		(55)		(130)		(51)		(430)
Income (loss) before income taxes		9,641		(4,220)		1,995		(19,725)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		2,829		(48)		(351)		(3,911)
Net income (loss)		6,812	$	(4,172)		2,346		(15,814)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		206		—		229		—
Net income (loss) attributable to AeroVironment	$	7,018	$	(4,172)	$	2,575	$	(15,814)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to AeroVironment:
Basic	$	0.30	$	(0.18)	$	0.11	$	(0.69)
Diluted	$	0.29	$	(0.18)	$	0.11	$	(0.69)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		23,477,914		23,049,056		23,407,500		23,002,832
Diluted		23,832,959		23,049,056		23,715,997		23,002,832

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,		October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income (loss)	$	6,812	$	(4,172)	$	2,346	$	(15,814)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on investments, net of deferred tax expense of $17 and $17 for the three months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively; and net of deferred tax expense of $19 and $29 for the six months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively		26		25		29		43
Total comprehensive income (loss)		6,838	$	(4,147)		2,375		(15,771)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		206		—		229		—
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AeroVironment	$	7,044	$	(4,147)	$	2,604	$	(15,771)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	2,346	$	(15,814)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		3,692		3,401
Loss from equity method investments		—		111
Impairment of long-lived assets		255		—
Provision for doubtful accounts		943		119
Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill		1,021		—
(Gains) losses on foreign currency transactions		(108)		269
Deferred income taxes		(1,093)		(329)
Stock-based compensation		2,608		1,813
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		—		22
Loss (Gain) on disposition of property and equipment		15		(7)
Amortization of held-to-maturity investments		897		1,259
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		38,440		29,562
Unbilled receivables and retentions		626		2,029
Inventories		(15,963)		(17,682)
Income tax receivable		—		(3,957)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		468		(555)
Accounts payable		(4,739)		1,413
Other liabilities		(5,289)		(7,933)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		24,119		(6,279)
Investing activities
Acquisition of property and equipment		(6,037)		(4,514)
Redemptions of held-to-maturity investments		105,758		53,961
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments		(88,763)		(79,052)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		—		7
Sales and redemptions of available-for-sale investments		450		400
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		11,408		(29,198)
Financing activities
Principal payments of capital lease obligations		(173)		(192)
Tax withholding payment related to net settlement of equity awards		(313)		—
Exercise of stock options		2,164		258
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,678		66
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		37,205		(35,411)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		79,904		124,287
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	117,109	$	88,876
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	1,803	$	1,786
Non-cash activities
Unrealized gain on investments, net of deferred tax expense of $19 and $29, respectively	$	29	$	43
Reclassification from share-based liability compensation to equity	$	384	$	307
Acquisitions of property and equipment included in accounts payable	$	888	$	704

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

AeroVironment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is engaged in the design, development, production, support and operation of unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) and efficient energy systems (“EES”) for various industries and governmental agencies.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation with respect to the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year ending April 30, 2018. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2017, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, including estimates of anticipated contract costs and revenue utilized in the revenue recognition process, that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and operating results of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the balance sheet and results of operations of Altoy Savunma Sanayi ve Havacilik Anonim Sirketi (“Altoy”), in which the Company increased its ownership to a controlling interest of 85% during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017. Prior to the increase in ownership, the Company's investment in Altoy was accounted for under the equity method.

In July 2016, the Company dissolved Charger Bicycles, LLC, the results of which were not material to the consolidated financial statements. During the three months ended October 29, 2016, the Company dissolved Skytower, LLC and Regenerative Fuel Cell Systems, LLC, the results of which were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. This ASU does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the requirement to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market under the previous requirement could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less a normal profit margin. Entities within the scope of this update will now be required to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory using LIFO or the retail inventory method. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 effective May 1, 2017 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. If goodwill impairment is realized, the amount recognized will be the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 must be applied on a prospective basis and will become effective for public entities in the first quarter of the year ending September 30, 2021, with early adoption available. The Company elected to early adopt the standard during the three months ended October 28, 2017. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Segments

The Company’s products are sold and divided among two reportable segments to reflect the Company’s strategic goals. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise from which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews the revenue and gross margin results for each of these segments in order to make resource allocation decisions, including the focus of research and development (“R&D”) activities and performance assessment. The Company’s reportable segments are business units that offer different products and services and are managed separately.

Investments

The Company’s investments are accounted for as held-to-maturity and available-for-sale and reported at amortized cost and fair value, respectively.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, retentions and accounts payable approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.

Government Contracts

Payments to the Company on government cost reimbursable contracts are based on provisional, or estimated indirect rates, which are subject to an annual audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). The cost audits result in the negotiation and determination of the final indirect cost rates that the Company may use for the period(s) audited. The final rates, if different from the provisional rates, may create an additional receivable or liability for the Company.

For example, during the course of its audits, the DCAA may question the Company’s incurred costs, and if the DCAA believes the Company has accounted for such costs in a manner inconsistent with the requirements under Federal Acquisition Regulations, the DCAA auditor may recommend to the Company’s administrative contracting officer to disallow such costs. Historically, the Company has not experienced material disallowed costs as a result of government audits. However, the Company can provide no assurance that the DCAA or other government audits will not result in material disallowances for incurred costs in the future.

The Company’s revenue recognition policy calls for revenue recognized on all cost reimbursable government contracts to be recorded at actual rates unless collectability is not reasonably assured. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017, the Company settled rates for its incurred cost claims with the DCAA for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 without payment of any consideration. At October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, the Company did not have any remaining reserves for incurred cost claim audits.

Table of Contents

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, excluding shares of unvested restricted stock.

The reconciliation of basic to diluted shares is as follows:


	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	October 28, 2017	October 29, 2016	October 28, 2017	October 29, 2016

Denominator for basic earnings per share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, excluding unvested restricted stock	23,477,914	23,049,056	23,407,500	23,002,832
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and unvested restricted stock	355,045	—	308,497	—
Denominator for diluted earnings per share	23,832,959	23,049,056	23,715,997	23,002,832

Potentially dilutive shares not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares because their effect would have been antidilutive were 0 and 14,820 for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, respectively. Due to the net loss for the three and six months ended October 29, 2016, no shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options or shares of unvested restricted stock were included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive shares not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares because their effect would have been anti-dilutive were 199,428 and 256,366 for the three and six months ended October 29, 2016, respectively.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations – Clarifying the definition of a business (Topic 805). This ASU clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of providing a more robust framework to evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. The amendments are to be applied prospectively to business combinations that occur after the effective date.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (Topic 230). This ASU adds and clarifies guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires the lessee to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of 12 months or more. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements. The Company currently does not hold a large number of leases that are classified as operating leases under the existing lease standard, with the only significant leases being the Company’s various property leases.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The new standard was originally effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption was not permitted. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)-Deferral of the Effective Date. This update approved a one-year delay of the effective date to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, while permitting companies to voluntarily adopt the new standard as of the original effective date. Since the issuance of ASU 2014-09, the FASB has issued several amendments to provide additional supplemental guidance on certain aspects of the original pronouncement. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenue

Table of Contents

upon the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received. In adopting the guidance, companies are permitted to select between two transition methods: (1) a full retrospective transition method with the application of the new guidance to each prior reporting period presented, or (2) a retrospective transition method that recognizes the cumulative effect on prior periods at the date of adoption together with additional footnote disclosures.

The Company currently expects to adopt ASU 2014-09 on May 1, 2018 using the full retrospective transition method. The Company is continuing to assess the potential impact of this guidance, including the impact on those areas currently subject to industry-specific guidance such as government contract accounting. As part of its assessment, the Company is reviewing representative samples of customer contracts to determine the impact on revenue recognition under the new guidance. The Company’s contracts with the U.S. government contain provisions that, among other things, allow the government to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience (in whole or in part), pay the Company for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. The Company is continuing to evaluate its contracts with the U.S. government to determine whether: (i) the Company’s performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced, or (ii) the Company’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Company and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. Revenues for contracts meeting either of these criteria will be recognized over the performance period using an acceptable measure of progress under the new standard, which the Company anticipates to be as costs are incurred.

The Company’s contracts with international governments for the purchase of small UAS and related services generally contain provisions that, among other things, allow the government to unilaterally terminate the contract for convenience (in whole or in part), pay the Company for costs incurred plus a reasonable profit and take control of any work in process. The Company is continuing to evaluate its contracts with its international UAS customers to determine whether the Company’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Company and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. Revenues for contracts meeting this criteria will be recognized over the performance period using an acceptable measure of progress under the new standard, which the Company anticipates to be as costs are incurred.

2. Investments

Investments consist of the following (in thousands):


	October 28,		April 30,
	2017		2017
Short-term investments:
Held-to-maturity securities:
Municipal securities	$	43,901	$	47,437
U.S. government securities		22,609		14,515
Corporate bonds		44,241		55,519
Certificates of deposit		—		2,500
Total held-to-maturity and short-term investments	$	110,751	$	119,971
Long-term investments:
Held-to-maturity securities:
Municipal securities	$	3,898	$	8,942
U.S. government securities		25,021		22,540
Corporate bonds		2,009		8,117
Total held-to-maturity investments		30,928		39,599
Available-for-sale securities:
Auction rate securities		2,096		2,497
Total available-for-sale investments		2,096		2,497
Total long-term investments	$	33,024	$	42,096

Table of Contents

Held-To-Maturity Securities

As of October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, the balance of held-to-maturity securities consisted of state and local government municipal securities, U.S. treasury securities, U.S. government-guaranteed agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities, certificates of deposit and highly rated corporate bonds. Interest earned from these investments is recorded in interest income.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investments as of October 28, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):


	October 28, 2017
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Municipal securities	$	47,799	$	13	$	(16)	$	47,796
U.S. government securities		47,630		—		(115)		47,515
Corporate bonds		46,250		1		(43)		46,208
Certificates of deposit		—		—		—		—
Total held-to-maturity investments	$	141,679	$	14	$	(174)	$	141,519

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investments as of April 30, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Municipal securities	$	56,379	$	30	$	(21)	$	56,388
U.S. government securities		37,055		2		(41)		37,016
Corporate bonds		63,636		9		(85)		63,560
Certificates of deposit		2,500		1		—		2,501
Total held-to-maturity investments	$	159,570	$	42	$	(147)	$	159,465

The amortized cost and fair value of the held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity at October 28, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):


	Cost		Fair Value
Due within one year	$	110,751	$	110,660
Due after one year through five years		30,928		30,859
Total	$	141,679	$	141,519

Available-For-Sale Securities

Auction Rate Securities

As of October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, the entire balance of available-for-sale auction rate securities, consisted of two investment grade auction rate municipal bonds, with maturities of approximately 2 and 17 years, respectively. These investments have characteristics similar to short-term investments, because at pre-determined intervals, generally ranging from 30 to 35 days, there is a new auction process at which the interest rates for these securities are reset to current interest rates. At the end of such period, the Company chooses to roll-over its holdings or redeem the investments for cash. A market maker facilitates the redemption of the securities and the underlying issuers are not required to redeem the investment within 365 days. Interest earned from these investments is recorded in interest income.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the Company began experiencing failed auctions on some of its auction rate securities. A failed auction occurs when a buyer for the securities cannot be obtained and the market maker does not buy the security for its own account. The Company continues to earn interest on the investments

Table of Contents

that failed to settle at auction, at the maximum contractual rate until the next auction occurs. In the event the Company needs to access funds invested in these auction rate securities, the Company may not be able to liquidate these securities at the fair value recorded on October 28, 2017, until a future auction of these securities is successful or a buyer is found outside of the auction process.

As a result of the failed auctions, the fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis as of October 28, 2017. The analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization underlying the security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the estimated date upon which the security is expected to have a successful auction. Based on the Company’s ability to access its cash and cash equivalents, expected operating cash flows, and other sources of cash, the Company does not anticipate that the current lack of liquidity of these investments will affect its ability to operate its business in the ordinary course. The Company believes the current lack of liquidity of these investments is temporary and expects that the securities will be redeemed or refinanced at some point in the future. The Company will continue to monitor the value of its auction rate securities at each reporting period for a possible impairment if a further decline in fair value occurs. The auction rate securities have been in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months. The Company has the ability and the intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity. As of October 28, 2017, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the auction rate securities as of October 28, 2017, were as follows (in thousands):


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Auction rate securities	$	2,250	$	—	$	(154)	$	2,096
Total available-for-sale investments	$	2,250	$	—	$	(154)	$	2,096

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the auction rate securities as of April 30, 2017, were as follows (in thousands):


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Auction rate securities	$	2,700	$	—	$	(203)	$	2,497
Total available-for-sale investments	$	2,700	$	—	$	(203)	$	2,497

The amortized cost and fair value of the auction rate securities by contractual maturity at October 28, 2017, were as follows (in thousands):


	Cost		Fair Value
Due after one through five years	$	250	$	250
Due after 10 years		2,000		1,846
Total	$	2,250	$	2,096

3. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy contains three levels as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.

Table of Contents

Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation include quoted prices in either markets that are not active, or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at October 28, 2017, were as follows (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurement Using
			Significant
	Quoted prices in		other		Significant
	active markets for		observable		unobservable
	identical assets		inputs		inputs
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
Auction rate securities	$	—	$	—	$	2,096	$	2,096
Total	$	—	$	—	$	2,096	$	2,096

The following table provides a reconciliation between the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the table above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):


	Fair Value
	Measurements Using
	Significant
	Unobservable Inputs
Description	(Level 3)
Balance at May 1, 2017	$	2,497
Transfers to Level 3		—
Total gains (realized or unrealized)
Included in earnings		—
Included in other comprehensive income		49
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		(450)
Balance at October 28, 2017	$	2,096
The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at October 28, 2017	$	—

The auction rate securities are valued using a discounted cash flow model. The analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization underlying the security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows and the estimated date upon which the security is expected to have a successful auction. As of October 28, 2017, the inputs used in the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis included current coupon rates of 1.58% and 1.59%, estimated redemption periods of 2 and 17 years and discount rates of 2.55% and 10.13%. The discount rates were based on market rates for municipal bond securities, as adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the lack of liquidity of these investments.

Table of Contents

4. Inventories, net

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):


	October 28,		April 30,
	2017		2017

Raw materials	$	21,423	$	18,365
Work in process		22,921		16,168
Finished goods		37,164		30,793
Inventories, gross		81,508		65,326
Reserve for inventory excess and obsolescence		(5,469)		(5,250)
Inventories, net	$	76,039	$	60,076

5. Warranty Reserves

The Company accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty claims based upon both current and historical product sales data and warranty costs incurred. The warranty reserve is included in other current liabilities. The related expense is included in cost of sales. Warranty reserve activity is summarized as follows for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		October 28,		October 29,		October 28,		October 29,
		2017		2016		2017		2016
Beginning balance	$	2,885	$	5,223	$	3,231	$	4,134
Warranty expense		719		144		1,166		336
Changes in estimates related to pre-existing warranties		—		(179)		—		1,228
Warranty costs settled		(520)		(1,500)		(1,313)		(2,010)
Ending balance	$	3,084	$	3,688	$	3,084	$	3,688

During the six months ended October 29, 2016, the Company revised its estimates based on the results of additional engineering studies and recorded incremental warranty reserve charges totaling $1,407,000 related to the estimated costs to repair a component of certain small UAS that were delivered in prior periods. At October 28, 2017, there were no remaining estimated warranty costs related to the repair of the impacted UAS. As of October 28, 2017, a total of $2,198,000 of costs related to this warranty have been incurred.

6. Intangibles

Intangibles are included in other assets on the balance sheet. The components of intangibles are as follows:


	April 30,		Impairment		October 28,
	2017		Charges		2017
	(In thousands)
Licenses	$	818	$	-	$	818
Customer relationships		1,600		(867)		733
Trademarks and tradenames		60		(32)		28
Other		3		-		3
Intangibles, gross		2,481	$	(899)		1,582
Less accumulated amortization		(658)				(816)
Intangibles, net	$	1,823			$	766

Table of Contents

The customer relationships, trademarks and tradenames, and other intangible assets were recognized in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of a controlling interest in Altoy on February 1, 2017.

The Company tests identifiable intangible assets and goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless there are interim indicators that suggest that it is more likely than not that either the identifiable intangible assets or goodwill may be impaired. Due to the current political situation within Turkey and the increased uncertainty in the relations between the U.S. and Turkey, the Company significantly lowered its cash flow expectations for its Altoy operations. As a result of the decline in the Company’s cash flow forecast, the Company performed an interim assessment of impairment of Altoy’s long-lived assets, excluding goodwill during the three months ended October 28, 2017. Based on the analysis, the Company determined that the fair value of Altoy had declined below its carrying value, excluding goodwill. As a result, the Company performed additional analysis to determine the amount of the impairment loss and recorded an impairment loss totaling $899,000 during the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, which is included in selling, general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Altoy asset group was determined based on a discounted cash flow model reflective of the revised cash flow estimates.

7. Goodwill

The following table presents the changes in the Company’s goodwill balance (in thousands):


Balance at April 30, 2017	$	122
Additions to goodwill		-
Impairment of goodwill		(122)
Balance at October 28, 2017	$	-

Goodwill is attributable to the acquisition of a controlling interest in Altoy on February 1, 2017.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year unless there are interim indicators that suggest that it is more likely than not that goodwill may be impaired. Due to the factors described in Note 6 above, the Company significantly lowered its cash flow expectations for its Altoy operations. As a result of the decline in the Company’s cash flow forecast, the Company performed an interim assessment of impairment of Altoy’s goodwill during the three months ended October 28, 2017. Based on the analysis, it was determined that Altoy’s fair value had declined significantly below its carrying value, including goodwill. As a result, the Company performed additional analysis to determine the amount of the impairment and recorded an impairment loss totaling $122,000 during the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, which is included in selling, general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and Reclassifications Adjustments

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss and adjustments are as follows (in thousands):


	Available-for-Sale		Accumulated Other
	Securities		Comprehensive Loss
Balance, net of $76 of taxes, as of April 30, 2017	$	(127)	$	(127)
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		—		—
Unrealized gains, net of $19 of taxes		29		29
Balance, net of $57 of taxes, as of October 28, 2017	$	(98)	$	(98)

9. Customer-Funded Research & Development

Customer-funded R&D costs are incurred pursuant to contracts (revenue arrangements) to perform R&D activities according to customer specifications. These costs are direct contract costs and are expensed to cost of sales when the corresponding revenue is recognized, which is generally as the R&D services are performed. Revenue from customer-

Table of Contents

funded R&D was approximately $13,873,000 and $20,108,000 for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, respectively. Revenue from customer-funded R&D was approximately $14,541,000 and $29,278,000 for the three and six months ended October 29, 2016, respectively.

10. Long-Term Incentive Awards

During the three months ended July 29, 2017, the Company granted awards under its amended and restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Restated 2006 Plan”) to key employees (“Fiscal 2018 LTIP”). Awards under the Fiscal 2018 LTIP consist of: (i) time-based restricted stock awards which vest in equal tranches in July 2018, July 2019 and July 2020, and (ii) performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) which vest based on the Company’s achievement of revenue and operating income targets for the three-year period ending April 30, 2020. At the award date, target achievement levels for each of the financial performance metrics were established for the PRSUs, at which levels the PRSUs would vest at 100% for each such metric. Threshold achievement levels for which the PRSUs would vest at 50% for each such metric and maximum achievement levels for which such awards would vest at 200% for each such metric were also established. The actual payout for the PRSUs at the end of the performance period will be calculated based upon the Company’s achievement of the established revenue and operating income targets for the performance period. Settlement of the PRSUs will be made in fully-vested shares of common stock. As of October 28, 2017, no compensation cost has been recognized for the performance-based portion of the Fiscal 2018 LTIP, as the Company concluded that it was not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. At October 28, 2017, the maximum compensation expense that may be recorded for the performance-based portion of the Fiscal 2018 LTIP is $2,850,000.

During the three months ended July 29, 2017, the Company also granted awards under the Restated 2006 Plan to key employees (“Fiscal 2017 LTIP”). Awards under the Fiscal 2017 LTIP consist of: (i) time-based restricted stock awards which vest in equal tranches in July 2017, July 2018 and July 2019, and (ii) PRSUs which vest based on the Company’s achievement of revenue and operating income targets for the three-year period ending April 30, 2019. At the award date, target achievement levels for each of the financial performance metrics were established for the PRSUs, at which levels the PRSUs would vest at 100% for each such metric. Threshold achievement levels for which the PRSUs would vest at 50% for each such metric and maximum achievement levels for which such awards would vest at 200% for each such metric were also established. The actual payout for the PRSUs at the end of the performance period will be calculated based upon the Company’s achievement of the established revenue and operating income targets for the performance period. Settlement of the PRSUs will be made in fully-vested shares of common stock. As of October 28, 2017, no compensation cost has been recognized for the performance-based portion of the Fiscal 2017 LTIP, as the Company concluded that it was not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. At October 28, 2017, the maximum compensation expense that may be recorded for the performance-based portion of the Fiscal 2017 LTIP is $2,630,000.

During the year ended April 30, 2016, the Company granted a three-year performance award under the Restated 2006 Plan to key employees (“Fiscal 2016 LTIP”). The performance period for each three-year award is the three-year period ending April 30, 2018. A target payout was established at the award date. The actual payout at the end of the performance period will be calculated based upon the Company’s achievement of revenue and gross margin for the performance period. Payouts will be made in cash and restricted stock units. Upon vesting of the restricted stock units, the Company has the discretion to settle the restricted stock units in cash or stock. As of October 28, 2017, no compensation cost has been recognized for this award as the Company has concluded that it was not probable that the performance conditions will be achieved. At October 28, 2017, the maximum compensation expense that may be recorded for the Fiscal 2016 LTIP is $2,690,000.

At each reporting period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved requires judgment, and, to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, the cumulative effect on current and prior periods of those changes will be recorded in the period estimates are revised.

11. Income Taxes

For the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, the Company recorded a provision (benefit) for income taxes of

Table of Contents

$2,829,000 and $(351,000), respectively, yielding an effective tax rate of 29.3% and (17.6)%, respectively. For the three and six months ended October 29, 2016, the Company recorded a (benefit) for income taxes of $(48,000) and $(3,911,000), yielding an effective tax rate of 1.1% and 19.8%, respectively. The variance from statutory rates for the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 was primarily due to federal R&D credits and the recording of discrete excess tax benefits of $376,000 and $1,401,000, respectively, resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options. The variance from statutory rates for the three and six months ended October 29, 2016, was primarily due to federal legislation reinstating the federal research and development tax credit during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and the reversal of a $968,000 reserve, including the related interest, for uncertain tax positions due to the settlement of prior fiscal year audits recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

12. Share Repurchase

In September 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $25,000,000 of the Company’s common stock with no specified termination date for the program. No shares were repurchased under the program during the three and six months ended October 28, 2017. As of October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, approximately $21.2 million remained authorized for future repurchases under this program.

13. Segment Data

The Company’s product segments are as follows:

Unmanned Aircraft Systems — The UAS segment focuses primarily on the design, development, production, support and operation of innovative UAS and tactical missile systems that provide situational awareness, multi-band communications, force protection and other mission effects to increase the security and effectiveness of the operations of the Company’s customers.

Efficient Energy Systems — The EES segment focuses primarily on the design, development, production, marketing, support and operation of innovative efficient electric energy systems that address the growing demand for electric transportation solutions.

Table of Contents

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.” The operating segments do not make sales to each other. Depreciation and amortization related to the manufacturing of goods is included in gross margin for the segments. The Company does not discretely allocate assets to its operating segments, nor does the CODM evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information. Consequently, the Company operates its financial systems as a single segment for accounting and control purposes, maintains a single indirect rate structure across all segments, has no inter-segment sales or corporate elimination transactions, and maintains limited financial statement information by segment. The segment results are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		October 28,		October 29,		October 28,		October 29,
		2017	2016			2017	2016
Revenue:
UAS	$	63,988	$	40,829	$	100,238	$	71,326
EES		9,839		9,287		17,353		15,008
Total		73,827		50,116		117,591		86,334
Cost of sales:
UAS		35,817		25,936		62,225		51,019
EES		7,010		6,763		12,736		11,215
Total		42,827		32,699		74,961		62,234
Gross margin:
UAS		28,171		14,893		38,013		20,307
EES		2,829		2,524		4,617		3,793
Total		31,000		17,417		42,630		24,100
Selling, general and administrative		14,464		13,387		27,795		27,050
Research and development		7,272		8,517		13,733		17,117
Income (loss) from operations		9,264		(4,487)		1,102		(20,067)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net		432		397		944		772
Other expense, net		(55)		(130)		(51)		(430)
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	9,641	$	(4,220)	$	1,995	$	(19,725)

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of operations as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Consolidated Financial Statements” and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This section and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our management’s beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017, as updated by our subsequent filings under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”).

Unless required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When we prepare these consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of our accounting policies require that we make subjective judgments, including estimates that involve matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, inventories and reserves for excess and obsolescence, warranty liabilities, self-insured liabilities, accounting for stock-based awards, and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no material changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017.

We review cost performance and estimates-to-complete at least quarterly and in many cases more frequently. Adjustments to original estimates for a contract’s revenue, estimated costs at completion and estimated profit or loss are often required as work progresses under a contract, as experience is gained and as more information is obtained, even though the scope of work required under the contract may not change, or if contract modifications occur. The impact of revisions in profit estimates for all types of contracts are recognized on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the revisions are made. During the three and six months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, changes in accounting estimates on fixed-price contracts recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting are presented below.

Table of Contents

For the three months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, favorable and unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments included in cost of sales were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016

Gross favorable adjustments	$	592	$	2,211
Gross unfavorable adjustments		(215)		(32)
Net favorable adjustments	$	377	$	2,179

For the three months ended October 28, 2017, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.6 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 15 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.2 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 8 contracts, which individually were not material.

For the three months ended October 29, 2016, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $2.2 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 53 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments were not material.

For the six months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, favorable and unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments included in cost of sales were as follows (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016

Gross favorable adjustments	$	1,011	$	2,257
Gross unfavorable adjustments		(458)		(209)
Net favorable adjustments	$	553	$	2,048

For the six months ended October 28, 2017, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $1.0 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 12 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.5 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 7 contracts, which individually were not material.

For the six months ended October 29, 2016, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $2.3 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 49 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.2 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 9 contracts, which individually were not material.

Fiscal Periods

Due to our fixed year end date of April 30, our first and fourth quarters each consist of approximately 13 weeks. The second and third quarters each consist of exactly 13 weeks. Our first three quarters end on a Saturday. Our 2018 fiscal year ends on April 30, 2018 and our fiscal quarters end on July 29, 2017, October 28, 2017 and January 27, 2018, respectively.

Results of Operations

Our operating segments are Unmanned Aircraft Systems, or UAS, and Efficient Energy Systems, or EES. Our accounting policies for each of these segments are the same. In addition, a significant portion of our research and development, or R&D, selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, and general overhead resources are shared across our segments.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our revenue and gross margin generated by each operating segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended October 28, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended October 29, 2016


	Three Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016
Revenue:
UAS	$	63,988	$	40,829
EES		9,839		9,287
Total		73,827		50,116
Cost of sales:
UAS		35,817		25,936
EES		7,010		6,763
Total		42,827		32,699
Gross margin:
UAS		28,171		14,893
EES		2,829		2,524
Total		31,000		17,417
Selling, general and administrative		14,464		13,387
Research and development		7,272		8,517
Income (loss) from operations		9,264		(4,487)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net		432		397
Other expense, net		(55)		(130)
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	9,641	$	(4,220)

Revenue. Revenue for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $73.8 million, as compared to $50.1 million for the three months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $23.7 million, or 47%. The increase in revenue was due to an increase in product deliveries of $23.6 million and an increase in service revenue of $0.1 million. UAS revenue increased $23.2 million, or 57%, to $64.0 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, due to an increase in product deliveries of $23.1 million and an increase in service revenue of $0.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in customer-funded R&D work of $0.7 million. The increase in product deliveries was primarily due to an increase in product deliveries of small UAS. During the three months ended October 28, 2017, we continued to experience expansion in small UAS product deliveries and related services to international customers. The increase in service revenue was primarily due to an increase in sustainment activities in support of small UAS for our international customers. The decrease in customer-funded R&D was primarily associated with tactical missile systems and tactical missile system variant programs. EES revenue increased $0.6 million, or 6%, to $9.8 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to an increase in product deliveries of our PosiCharge industrial electric vehicle charging systems.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $42.8 million, as compared to $32.7 million for the three months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $10.1 million, or 31%. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales decreased from 65% to 58%. The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to an increase in product costs of $10.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in cost of services of $0.7 million. The increase in product costs was primarily due to the increase in product deliveries. The decrease in cost of services was primarily due to mix. UAS cost of sales increased $9.9 million, or 38%, to $35.8 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to an increase in product deliveries. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for UAS decreased from 64% to 56%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. EES cost of sales increased $0.2 million, or 4%, to $7.0 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increased sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for EES decreased from 73% to 71%.

Table of Contents

Gross Margin. Gross margin for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $31.0 million, as compared to $17.4 million for the three months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $13.6 million, or 78%. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in product margins of $12.8 million and an increase in service margins of $0.8 million. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin increased from 35% to 42%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. UAS gross margin increased $13.3 million, or 89%, to $28.2 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increase in product sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin for UAS increased from 36% to 44%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. EES gross margin increased $0.3 million, or 12%, to $2.8 million for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increased sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, EES gross margin increased from 27% to 29%.

Selling, General and Administrative. SG&A expense for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $14.5 million, or 20% of revenue, compared to SG&A expense of $13.4 million, or 27% of revenue, for the three months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to the recording of impairment charges totaling $1.0 million related to the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of Altoy, our Turkish majority-owned subsidiary, during the three months ended October 28, 2017.

Research and Development. R&D expense for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $7.3 million, or 10% of revenue, compared to R&D expense of $8.5 million, or 17% of revenue, for the three months ended October 29, 2016. R&D expense decreased by $1.2 million, or 15%, for the three months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to a planned decrease in development activities for certain strategic initiatives.

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $0.4 million compared to interest income, net of $0.4 million for the three months ended October 29, 2016.

Other Expense, net. Other expense, net for the three months ended October 28, 2017 was $0.1 million compared to other expense, net of $0.1 million for the three months ended October 29, 2016.

Benefit for Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 29.3% for the three months ended October 28, 2017, as compared to 1.1% for the three months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to an increase in income before income taxes and an increase in the estimated full year effective income tax rate driven by an increase in full year projected income before income taxes. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended October 28, 2017 included a discrete excess tax benefit of $0.4 million resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options.

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended October 28, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended October 29, 2016


	Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016
Revenue:
UAS	$	100,238	$	71,326
EES		17,353		15,008
Total		117,591		86,334
Cost of sales:
UAS		62,225		51,019
EES		12,736		11,215
Total		74,961		62,234
Gross margin:
UAS		38,013		20,307
EES		4,617		3,793
Total		42,630		24,100
Selling, general and administrative		27,795		27,050
Research and development		13,733		17,117
Income (loss) from operations		1,102		(20,067)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net		944		772
Other expense, net		(51)		(430)
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	1,995	$	(19,725)

Revenue. Revenue for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $117.6 million, as compared to $86.3 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $31.3 million, or 36%. The increase in revenue was due to an increase in product deliveries of $38.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in service revenue of $7.7 million. UAS revenue increased $28.9 million, or 41%, to $100.2 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, due to an increase in product deliveries of $36.6 million and an increase in service revenue of $1.5 million, partially offset by a decrease in customer-funded R&D work of $9.2 million. The increase in product deliveries was primarily due to an increase in product deliveries of small UAS and an increase in product deliveries of tactical missile systems. During the six months ended October 28, 2017, we continued to experience expansion in small UAS product deliveries and related services to international customers and in tactical missile system product deliveries and related services to customers within the U.S. government. The increase in service revenue was primarily due to an increase in sustainment activities in support of small UAS for our international customers. The decrease in customer-funded R&D was primarily associated with tactical missile systems and tactical missile system variant programs. EES revenue increased $2.3 million, or 16%, to $17.4 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to an increase in product deliveries of passenger electric vehicle charging systems and our PosiCharge industrial electric vehicle charging systems.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $75.0 million, as compared to $62.2 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $12.7 million, or 20%. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales decreased from 72% to 64%. The increase in cost of sales was primarily due to an increase in product costs of $19.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in cost of services of $7.1 million. The increase in product costs was primarily due to the increase in product deliveries. The decrease in cost of services was primarily due to the decrease in service revenue. UAS cost of sales increased $11.2 million, or 22%, to $62.2 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to an increase in product deliveries. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for UAS decreased from 72% to 62%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. EES cost of sales increased $1.5 million, or 14%, to $12.7 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increased sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for EES decreased from 75% to 73%, primarily due to the increased sales volume.

Gross Margin. Gross margin for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $42.6 million, as compared to $24.1 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016, representing an increase of $18.5 million, or 77%. The

Table of Contents

increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in product margins of $19.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in service margins of $0.6 million. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin increased from 28% to 36%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. UAS gross margin increased $17.7 million, or 87%, to $38.0 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increase in product deliveries. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin for UAS increased from 28% to 38%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume and an increase in the proportion of product sales to total revenue. EES gross margin increased $0.8 million, or 22%, to $4.6 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to the increased sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, EES gross margin increased from 25% to 27%, primarily due to the increased sales volume.

Selling, General and Administrative. SG&A expense for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $27.8 million, or 24% of revenue, compared to SG&A expense of $27.0 million, or 31% of revenue, for the six months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to the recording of impairment charges totaling $1.0 million related to the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of Altoy during the three months ended October 28, 2017.

Research and Development. R&D expense for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $13.7 million, or 12% of revenue, compared to R&D expense of $17.1 million, or 20% of revenue, for the six months ended October 29, 2016. R&D expense decreased by $3.4 million, or 20%, for the six months ended October 28, 2017, primarily due to a planned decrease in development activities for certain strategic initiatives.

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $0.9 million compared to interest income, net of $0.8 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016.

Other Expense, net. Other expense, net for the six months ended October 28, 2017 was $0.1 million compared to other expense, net of $0.4 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016.

Benefit for Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate was (17.6)% for the six months ended October 28, 2017, as compared to 19.8% for the six months ended October 29, 2016. The year over year change in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to R&D tax credits and discrete excess tax benefits resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options, partially offset by an increase in income before income taxes and an increase in the estimated full year effective income tax rate driven by an increase in full year projected income before income taxes. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended October 28, 2017 included a discrete excess tax benefit of $1.4 million resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended October 29, 2016 included a reversal of a reserve for uncertain tax positions of $1.0 million due to the settlement of prior fiscal year audits.

Backlog

We define funded backlog as unfilled firm orders for products and services for which funding currently is appropriated to us under the contract by the customer. As of October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, our funded backlog was approximately $127.1 million and $78.0 million, respectively.

In addition to our funded backlog, we also had unfunded backlog of $21.2 million and $24.6 million as of October 28, 2017 and April 30, 2017, respectively. We define unfunded backlog as the total remaining potential order amounts under cost reimbursable and fixed price contracts with multiple one-year options, and indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity, or IDIQ contracts. Unfunded backlog does not obligate the U.S. government to purchase goods or services. There can be no assurance that unfunded backlog will result in any orders in any particular period, if at all. Management believes that unfunded backlog does not provide a reliable measure of future estimated revenue under our contracts. Unfunded backlog does not include the remaining potential value associated with a U.S. Army IDIQ-type contract for small UAS because the contract was awarded to five companies in 2012, including AeroVironment, and we cannot be certain that we will receive task orders issued against the contract.

Because of possible future changes in delivery schedules and/or cancellations of orders, backlog at any particular date is not necessarily representative of actual sales to be expected for any succeeding period, and actual sales for the year may

Table of Contents

not meet or exceed the backlog represented. Our backlog is typically subject to large variations from quarter to quarter as existing contracts expire, or are renewed, or new contracts are awarded. A majority of our contracts, specifically our IDIQ contracts, do not currently obligate the U.S. government to purchase any goods or services. Additionally, all U.S. government contracts included in backlog, whether or not they are funded, may be terminated at the convenience of the U.S. government.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We currently have no material cash commitments, except for normal recurring trade payables, accrued expenses and ongoing R&D costs, all of which we anticipate funding through our existing working capital and funds provided by operating activities. The majority of our purchase obligations are pursuant to funded contractual arrangements with our customers. In addition, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and other financing sources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements during the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will continue to generate cash flow at current levels. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, then we may be required to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures or obtain financing. We anticipate that existing sources of liquidity and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the foreseeable future.

Our primary liquidity needs are for financing working capital, investing in capital expenditures, supporting product development efforts, introducing new products, enhancing existing products and marketing to stimulate acceptance and adoption of our products and services. Our future capital requirements, to a certain extent, are also subject to general conditions in or affecting the defense, commercial and electric vehicle industries and are subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors that are beyond our control. To the extent that existing cash, cash equivalents, and cash from operations are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing. We may also need to seek additional equity funding or debt financing if we become a party to any agreement or letter of intent for potential investments in, or acquisitions of, businesses, services or technologies.

Our working capital requirements vary by contract type. On cost-plus-fee programs, we typically bill our incurred costs and fees monthly as work progresses, and therefore working capital investment is minimal. On fixed-price contracts, we typically are paid as we deliver products, and working capital is needed to fund labor and other expenses incurred during the lead time from contract award until contract deliveries begin.

Cash Flows

The following table provides our cash flow data for the six months ended October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016 (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended
	October 28,		October 29,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	24,119	$	(6,279)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	11,408	$	(29,198)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	1,678	$	66

Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended October 28, 2017 increased by $30.4 million to $24.1 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $6.3 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to an increase in net income of $18.2 million, an increase in cash as a result of changes in operating assets and liabilities of $10.7 million, largely resulting from decreases in accounts receivable due to the year over year timing of revenue and related cash collections, and non-cash expenses of $1.6 million, primarily associated with the impairment of the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill of Altoy.

Table of Contents

Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. Net cash provided by investing activities increased by $40.6 million to $11.4 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $29.2 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to an increase in net redemptions and purchases of investments of $42.1 million, partially offset by an increase in cash paid for purchases of property and equipment of $1.5 million.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $1.6 million to $1.7 million for the six months ended October 28, 2017, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $0.1 million for the six months ended October 29, 2016. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due an increase in cash provided from the exercise of employee stock options of $1.9 million.

Contractual Obligations

During the three and six months ended October 28, 2017, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations and commercial commitments from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of October 28, 2017, we had no off‑balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S‑K.

Inflation

Our operations have not been, and we do not expect them to be, materially affected by inflation. Historically, we have been successful in adjusting prices to our customers to reflect changes in our material and labor costs.

New Accounting Standards

Please refer to Note 1 “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements and accounting pronouncements adopted during the three and six months ended October 28, 2017.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to various market risk factors, including fluctuations in interest rates, changes in general economic conditions, domestic and foreign competition, and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

It is our policy not to enter into interest rate derivative financial instruments. We do not currently have any significant interest rate exposure.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Since a significant part of our sales and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, we have not experienced significant foreign exchange gains or losses to date, and do not expect to incur significant foreign exchange gains or losses in the future.

Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of October 28, 2017, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of October 28, 2017, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at a reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended October 28, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. We are, however, subject to lawsuits, government investigations, audits and other legal proceedings from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. It is not possible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding with certainty. The outcome or costs we incur in connection with a legal proceeding could adversely impact our operating results and financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On September 24, 2015, we announced that on September 23, 2015 our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the “Share Repurchase Program”), pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $25 million of our common stock from time to time, in amounts and at prices we deem appropriate, subject to market conditions and other considerations. Share repurchases may be executed through open market transactions or negotiated purchases and may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. There is no expiration date for the program. The Share Repurchase Program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be suspended at any time by our Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased in the three and six months ended October 28, 2017. As of October 28, 2017, approximately $21.2 million remained authorized for future repurchases under this program.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description
3.1(1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AeroVironment, Inc.
3.2(2)		Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of AeroVironment, Inc.
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32#		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

(1)

Incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q filed March 9, 2007 (File No. 001‑33261).

(2)

Incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed July 1, 2015 (File No. 001-33261).

# The information in Exhibit 32 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this report), unless the Company specifically incorporates the foregoing information into those documents by reference.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: December 5, 2017		AEROVIRONMENT, INC.

	By:	/s/ Wahid Nawabi
		Wahid Nawabi
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

		/s/ Teresa P. Covington
		Teresa P. Covington
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)