PX-Q2 2013 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
PRAXAIR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
| | |
1-11037 | | 06-1249050 |
(Commission File Number) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| |
39 OLD RIDGEBURY ROAD, DANBURY, CT | | 06810-5113 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(203) 837-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ý | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý
At June 30, 2013, 294,843,878 shares of common stock ($0.01 par value) of the Registrant were outstanding.
|
| | |
INDEX |
| |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Item 5. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
| | |
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Millions of dollars, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
SALES | $ | 3,014 |
| | $ | 2,811 |
|
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 1,710 |
| | 1,602 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 344 |
| | 310 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 275 |
| | 247 |
|
Research and development | 24 |
| | 25 |
|
Other income (expense) - net | 4 |
| | 9 |
|
OPERATING PROFIT | 665 |
| | 636 |
|
Interest expense - net | 41 |
| | 33 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS | 624 |
| | 603 |
|
Income taxes | 174 |
| | 169 |
|
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY INVESTMENTS | 450 |
| | 434 |
|
Income from equity investments | 11 |
| | 10 |
|
NET INCOME (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | 461 |
| | 444 |
|
Less: noncontrolling interests | (16 | ) | | (15 | ) |
NET INCOME - PRAXAIR, INC. | $ | 445 |
| | $ | 429 |
|
PER SHARE DATA - PRAXAIR, INC. SHAREHOLDERS | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 1.43 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
|
Cash dividends per share | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (000’s): | | | |
Basic shares outstanding | 295,668 |
| | 298,885 |
|
Diluted shares outstanding | 298,654 |
| | 302,492 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Millions of dollars, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
SALES | $ | 5,902 |
| | $ | 5,651 |
|
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 3,348 |
| | 3,218 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 681 |
| | 645 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 541 |
| | 499 |
|
Research and development | 48 |
| | 49 |
|
Venezuela currency devaluation | 23 |
| | — |
|
Other income (expense) - net | 4 |
| | 23 |
|
OPERATING PROFIT | 1,265 |
| | 1,263 |
|
Interest expense - net | 81 |
| | 70 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY INVESTMENTS | 1,184 |
| | 1,193 |
|
Income taxes | 338 |
| | 334 |
|
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY INVESTMENTS | 846 |
| | 859 |
|
Income from equity investments | 21 |
| | 17 |
|
NET INCOME (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | 867 |
| | 876 |
|
Less: noncontrolling interests | (31 | ) | | (28 | ) |
NET INCOME - PRAXAIR, INC. | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 848 |
|
PER SHARE DATA - PRAXAIR, INC. SHAREHOLDERS | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 2.82 |
| | $ | 2.84 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.79 |
| | $ | 2.80 |
|
Cash dividends per share | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (000’s): | | | |
Basic shares outstanding | 296,136 |
| | 298,981 |
|
Diluted shares outstanding | 299,290 |
| | 302,657 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Millions of dollars)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
NET INCOME (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | $ | 461 |
| | $ | 444 |
|
| | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | | |
Translation adjustments: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (413 | ) | | (570 | ) |
Income taxes | 20 |
| | 22 |
|
Translation adjustments | (393 | ) | | (548 | ) |
Funded status - retirement obligations (Note 11): | | | |
Retirement program remeasurements | (14 | ) | | (9 | ) |
Reclassifications to net income | 23 |
| | 15 |
|
Income taxes | (1 | ) | | 3 |
|
Funded status - retirement obligations | 8 |
| | 9 |
|
Derivative instruments (Note 6): | | | |
Current quarter unrealized gain (loss) | — |
| | 5 |
|
Reclassifications to net income | (1 | ) | | — |
|
Income taxes | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Derivative instruments | (1 | ) | | 4 |
|
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | (386 | ) | | (535 | ) |
| | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | 75 |
| | (91 | ) |
Less: noncontrolling interests | (10 | ) | | 5 |
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - PRAXAIR, INC. | $ | 65 |
| | $ | (86 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Millions of dollars)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
NET INCOME (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | $ | 867 |
| | $ | 876 |
|
| | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | | |
Translation adjustments: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (431 | ) | | (290 | ) |
Income taxes | 19 |
| | 14 |
|
Translation adjustments | (412 | ) | | (276 | ) |
Funded status - retirement obligations (Note 11): | | | |
Retirement program remeasurements | (10 | ) | | (22 | ) |
Reclassifications to net income | 45 |
| | 31 |
|
Income taxes | (9 | ) | | 7 |
|
Funded status - retirement obligations | 26 |
| | 16 |
|
Derivative instruments (Note 6): | | | |
Current quarter unrealized gain (loss) | — |
| | 7 |
|
Reclassifications to net income | — |
| | — |
|
Income taxes | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Derivative instruments | — |
| | 5 |
|
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | (386 | ) | | (255 | ) |
| | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS) | 481 |
| | 621 |
|
Less: noncontrolling interests | (17 | ) | | (19 | ) |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - PRAXAIR, INC. | $ | 464 |
| | $ | 602 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of dollars)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
ASSETS | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 157 |
|
Accounts receivable - net | 1,961 |
| | 1,834 |
|
Inventories | 480 |
| | 476 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets | 470 |
| | 325 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 3,013 |
| | 2,792 |
|
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation of $11,383 in 2013 and $11,226 in 2012) | 11,867 |
| | 11,453 |
|
Goodwill | 3,159 |
| | 2,507 |
|
Other intangible assets - net | 576 |
| | 173 |
|
Other long-term assets | 1,156 |
| | 1,165 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 19,771 |
| | $ | 18,090 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 915 |
| | $ | 928 |
|
Short-term debt | 1,234 |
| | 638 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt | 9 |
| | 39 |
|
Other current liabilities | 832 |
| | 874 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 2,990 |
| | 2,479 |
|
Long-term debt | 7,863 |
| | 6,685 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 2,374 |
| | 2,253 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 13,227 |
| | 11,417 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
| |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 14) | 259 |
| | 252 |
|
Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity: | | | |
Common stock $0.01 par value, authorized - 800,000,000 shares, issued 2013 - 383,178,226 shares and 2012 - 383,073,446 shares | 4 |
| | 4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 3,931 |
| | 3,889 |
|
Retained earnings | 10,002 |
| | 9,534 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (2,235 | ) | | (1,852 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost (2013 - 88,334,348 shares and 2012 - 86,843,966 shares) | (5,774 | ) | | (5,511 | ) |
Total Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | 5,928 |
| | 6,064 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 357 |
| | 357 |
|
TOTAL EQUITY | 6,285 |
| | 6,421 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 19,771 |
| | $ | 18,090 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of dollars)
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
OPERATIONS | | | |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 848 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 31 |
| | 28 |
|
Net income (including noncontrolling interests) | 867 |
| | 876 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Venezuela currency devaluation | 23 |
| | — |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 541 |
| | 499 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 99 |
| | 83 |
|
Share-based compensation | 34 |
| | 35 |
|
Accounts receivable | (164 | ) | | (47 | ) |
Inventory | (27 | ) | | (14 | ) |
Prepaid and other current assets | (164 | ) | | 3 |
|
Payables and accruals | (6 | ) | | (118 | ) |
Pension contributions | (43 | ) | | (109 | ) |
Long-term assets, liabilities and other | (111 | ) | | (81 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,049 |
| | 1,127 |
|
INVESTING | | | |
Capital expenditures | (988 | ) | | (1,047 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (1,269 | ) | | (51 | ) |
Divestitures and asset sales | 38 |
| | 71 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities | (2,219 | ) | | (1,027 | ) |
FINANCING | | | |
Short-term debt borrowings (repayments) - net | 602 |
| | (218 | ) |
Long-term debt borrowings | 2,088 |
| | 1,400 |
|
Long-term debt repayments | (935 | ) | | (730 | ) |
Issuances of common stock | 76 |
| | 107 |
|
Purchases of common stock | (345 | ) | | (313 | ) |
Cash dividends - Praxair, Inc. shareholders | (355 | ) | | (328 | ) |
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation | 24 |
| | 44 |
|
Noncontrolling interest transactions and other | (17 | ) | | (41 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | 1,138 |
| | (79 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (23 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Change in cash and cash equivalents | (55 | ) | | 14 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning-of-period | 157 |
| | 90 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end-of-period | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 104 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
INDEX TO NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Praxair, Inc. and Subsidiaries (Unaudited)
PRAXAIR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Presentation of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - In the opinion of Praxair, Inc. (Praxair) management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented and such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair, Inc. and subsidiaries in Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to the company’s significant accounting policies during 2013.
Accounting Standards Implemented in 2013
The following standards were effective for Praxair in 2013 and their adoption did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements:
| |
• | Statement of Comprehensive Income - In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued updated disclosure requirements regarding the presentation of other comprehensive income. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. Refer to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) following the Consolidated Statements of Income. |
| |
• | Offsetting Assets and Liabilities – In December 2011, the FASB issued updated disclosure requirements related to a company’s right or requirement to offset balance sheet items and the related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. The new guidance requires the disclosure of the gross amounts subject to rights of setoff, amounts offset, and the related net exposure. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
Accounting Standards to be Implemented
| |
• | Accounting for Cumulative Translation Adjustment – In March 2013, the FASB issued updated guidance on the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity, or as a result of acquisitions achieved in stages. This guidance will be effective for Praxair beginning with the first quarter 2014. Praxair does not expect this requirement to have any impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
Reclassifications – Certain prior years’ amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
2. Venezuela Currency Devaluation and Other Charges
2013 Venezuela Currency Devaluation
On February 8, 2013, Venezuela announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar from 4.30 to 6.30 (a 32% devaluation), effective on February 13, 2013. Praxair recorded a $23 million charge ($23 million after-tax or $0.08 per diluted share) due primarily to the remeasurement of the local Venezuelan balance sheet to reflect the new official 6.30 exchange rate. The company does not expect the impact of the devaluation on future results of operations to be significant.
2012 Cost Reduction Program
In the third quarter 2012, Praxair recorded pre-tax charges totaling $56 million ($38 million after-tax and noncontrolling interest), relating to severance and business restructuring actions primarily in Europe within the industrial gases and surface technologies businesses. The severance costs of $43 million are for the termination of approximately 410 employees, primarily in Europe (industrial gases and surface technologies) of which approximately 330 have been terminated as of June 30, 2013. The costs associated with exit or disposal activities of $13 million include asset write-downs and other costs associated with a decision to eliminate and/or restructure operations and product lines. The remaining actions are expected to be completed during 2013. These actions reflected the business slow-down in Europe and resulted from a decision to eliminate and/or restructure operations and product lines.
The following table summarizes the activities related to the six months ended June 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | Severance Costs | | Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities | | Total Cost Reduction Program |
Balance, January 1, 2013 | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 34 |
|
Less: Cash payments | (8 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (11 | ) |
Less: Non-cash asset write-offs | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Foreign currency translation | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Balance, June 30, 2013 | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 22 |
|
For further details regarding the cost reduction program and other charges, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
3. 2013 Acquisitions
NuCO2
On March 1, 2013 Praxair acquired 100% of NuCO2 Inc. ("NuCO2") for $1,095 million. NuCO2 is the leading national provider of beverage carbonation solutions in the United States to the restaurant and hospitality industries with 162,000 customer locations and 900 employees, and with 2012 sales of approximately $230 million. The NuCO2 micro-bulk beverage carbonation solution is the service model of choice for quick service restaurants and convenience stores offering fountain beverages and represents an extension of Praxair's core industrial gas business.
The acquisition of NuCO2 was accounted for as a business combination. Following the acquisition date, 100% of NuCO2's results were consolidated in the North America business segment. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, Praxair's consolidated income statement includes sales of $61 million and $81 million, respectively, related to NuCO2. Pro forma results for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have not been included as the impact of the acquisition is not material to the consolidated statements of income.
The following table summarizes the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of NuCO2 as of the acquisition date. The allocation of the purchase price is based on preliminary estimates and assumptions, and are subject to revision based on final information received, including appraisals and other analysis that support underlying estimates:
|
| | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | | March 1, 2013 |
Trade receivables, net | | $ | 17 |
|
Property, plant and equipment | | 199 |
|
Intangible assets | | 374 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | (85 | ) |
Other assets and (liabilities) | | (28 | ) |
Goodwill | | 618 |
|
Purchase price | | $ | 1,095 |
|
The identifiable intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships that will be amortized over their estimated useful life of 25 years. The deferred income taxes relate primarily to property, plant and equipment, intangibles and operating loss carryforwards. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition is attributable to expected growth and cost synergies and is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Other Acquisitions
On May 29, 2013 Praxair acquired Dominion Technology Gases (“Dominion”), a leading global supplier of diving, welding, industrial, laboratory and calibration gases and associated equipment to the offshore oil and gas industry based in Aberdeen, Scotland. Dominion provides products and services to the expanding global offshore oil and gas market.
On June 3, 2013 Praxair acquired Volgograd Oxygen Factory (“VOF”), the largest independent industrial gas business in southern Russia, expanding Praxair's production and distribution capabilities in the Volgograd region. Additionally, Praxair acquired several smaller independent package gas distributors in the United States.
These acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations; accordingly the results of operations of these acquisitions were consolidated from the respective acquisition dates, primarily in the Europe business segment and the impact was not significant. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was $174 million and resulted in the recognition of $144 million of intangible assets, including $99 million of goodwill and $35 million relating to customer relationships, which will be amortized over their estimated useful life.
4. Supplemental Information
Inventories
The following is a summary of Praxair’s consolidated inventories:
|
| | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Inventories | | | |
Raw materials and supplies | $ | 156 |
| | $ | 164 |
|
Work in process | 54 |
| | 56 |
|
Finished goods | 270 |
| | 256 |
|
Total inventories | $ | 480 |
| | $ | 476 |
|
Long-term receivables
Long-term receivables are not material and are largely reserved. Such long-term receivables are included within other long-term assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and totaled $43 million and $46 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. These amounts are net of reserves of $44 million and $43 million, respectively. The amounts in both periods relate primarily to government receivables in Brazil and other long-term notes receivable from customers. Collectability is reviewed regularly and uncollectible amounts are written-off as appropriate. The decrease in the balances during 2013 was due primarily to foreign currency movements.
5. Debt
The following is a summary of Praxair’s outstanding debt at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
SHORT-TERM | | | |
Commercial paper and U.S. bank borrowings | $ | 1,085 |
| | $ | 563 |
|
Other bank borrowings (primarily international) | 149 |
| | 75 |
|
Total short-term debt | 1,234 |
| | 638 |
|
LONG-TERM | | | |
U.S. borrowings | | | |
3.95% Notes due 2013 (d, e) | — |
| | 350 |
|
2.125% Notes due 2013 (a, b, d, e) | — |
| | 504 |
|
4.375% Notes due 2014 (a, d) | 300 |
| | 299 |
|
5.25% Notes due 2014 | 400 |
| | 400 |
|
4.625% Notes due 2015 | 500 |
| | 500 |
|
3.25% Notes due 2015 (a, b) | 425 |
| | 431 |
|
0.75% Notes due 2016 (c) | 400 |
| | — |
|
5.375% Notes due 2016 | 400 |
| | 400 |
|
5.20% Notes due 2017 | 325 |
| | 325 |
|
1.05% Notes due 2017 | 400 |
| | 400 |
|
1.20% Notes due 2018 (a, c) | 499 |
| | — |
|
1.25% Notes due 2018 (c) | 475 |
| | — |
|
4.50% Notes due 2019 (a) | 598 |
| | 598 |
|
4.05% Notes due 2021 (a) | 498 |
| | 498 |
|
3.00% Notes due 2021 (a) | 497 |
| | 496 |
|
2.45% Notes due 2022 (a) | 598 |
| | 598 |
|
2.20% Notes due 2022 (a) | 499 |
| | 499 |
|
2.70% Notes due 2023 (a, c) | 498 |
| | — |
|
3.55% Notes due 2042 (a, c) | 466 |
| | 298 |
|
Other | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
| | | |
International bank borrowings | 79 |
| | 113 |
|
Obligations under capital leases | 10 |
| | 10 |
|
| 7,872 |
| | 6,724 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt | (9 | ) | | (39 | ) |
Total long-term debt | 7,863 |
| | 6,685 |
|
Total debt | $ | 9,106 |
| | $ | 7,362 |
|
| |
(a) | Amounts are net of unamortized discounts. |
| |
(b) | June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include a $26 million and $36 million fair value increase, respectively, related to hedge accounting. See Note 6 for additional information. |
| |
(c) | For the six months ended June 30, 2013, Praxair issued the following notes totaling $2.1 billion: $400 million of 0.75% notes due 2016, $500 million of 2.70% notes due 2023, $500 million of 1.20% notes due 2018, $475 million of 1.25% notes due 2018 and $175 million of 3.55% notes due 2042. The proceeds of all issuances were used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions, repayment of debt and share repurchases under our share repurchase program. |
| |
(d) | Classified as long-term because of the Company’s intent to refinance this debt on a long-term basis and the availability of such financing under the terms of an existing $1.75 billion long-term credit facility, which also includes an option to increase the amount of the long-term agreement to $2.0 billion upon mutual agreement. |
| |
(e) | In June 2013, Praxair repaid $350 million of 3.95% notes and $500 million of 2.125% notes that became due. |
6. Financial Instruments
In its normal operations, Praxair is exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, energy costs and to a lesser extent precious metal prices. The objective of financial risk management at Praxair is to minimize the negative impact of such fluctuations on the company’s earnings and cash flows. To manage these risks, among other strategies, Praxair routinely enters into various derivative financial instruments (“derivatives”) including interest-rate swap and treasury rate lock agreements, currency-swap agreements, forward contracts, currency options, and commodity-swap agreements. These instruments are not entered into for trading purposes and Praxair only uses commonly traded and non-leveraged instruments.
There are two types of derivatives that the company enters into: (i) those relating to fair-value exposures, and (ii) those relating to cash-flow exposures. Fair-value exposures relate to recognized assets or liabilities, and firm commitments; while cash-flow exposures relate to the variability of future cash flows associated with recognized assets or liabilities, or forecasted transactions.
When a derivative is executed and hedge accounting is appropriate, it is designated as either a fair-value hedge or a cash-flow hedge. Currently, Praxair designates all interest-rate and treasury-rate locks as hedges for accounting purposes; however, currency contracts are generally not designated as hedges for accounting purposes unless they are related to forecasted transactions. Whether designated as hedges for accounting purposes or not, all derivatives are linked to an appropriate underlying exposure. On an ongoing basis, the company assesses the hedge effectiveness of all derivatives designated as hedges for accounting purposes to determine if they continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the underlying hedged items. If it is determined that the hedge is not highly effective, then hedge accounting will be discontinued prospectively.
Counterparties to Praxair’s derivatives are major banking institutions with credit ratings of investment grade or better and no collateral is required, and there are no significant risk concentrations. Management believes the risk of incurring losses on derivative contracts related to credit risk is remote and any losses would be immaterial.
The following table is a summary of the notional amount and fair value of derivatives outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value |
| Notional Amounts | | Assets | | Liabilities |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance sheet items (a) | $ | 2,239 |
| | $ | 2,515 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forecasted purchases (a) | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swaps (b) | 400 |
| | 400 |
| | 26 |
| | 32 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 405 |
| | $ | 410 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Total Derivatives | $ | 2,644 |
| | $ | 2,925 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| |
(a) | Assets are recorded in prepaid and other current assets, and liabilities are recorded in other current liabilities. |
| |
(b) | Assets are recorded in long term assets. |
Currency Contracts
Balance Sheet Items
Foreign currency contracts related to balance sheet items consist of forward contracts entered into to manage the exposure to fluctuations in foreign-currency exchange rates on recorded balance sheet assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the related operating unit. The fair value adjustments on these contracts are offset by the fair value adjustments recorded on the hedged assets and liabilities.
Anticipated Net Income
Historically Praxair has entered into anticipated net income hedge contracts consisting of foreign currency options and forwards related primarily to anticipated net income in Brazil, Europe and Canada. Although there were no anticipated net income hedges outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, such derivatives were outstanding during the six month period ended June 30, 2012. Over the term of the contracts, the fair value adjustments from net-income hedging contracts are largely offset by the impacts on reported net income resulting from currency translation. The accounting rules pertaining to derivatives and hedging do not allow hedges of anticipated net income to be designated as hedging instruments.
Forecasted Purchases
Foreign currency contracts related to forecasted purchases consist of forward contracts entered into to manage the exposure to fluctuations in foreign-currency exchange rates on forecasted purchases of capital-related equipment and services denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the related operating units. These forward contracts were designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges.
Interest Rate Contracts
Outstanding Interest Rate Swaps
At June 30, 2013, Praxair had an interest-rate swap agreement outstanding related to the $400 million 3.25% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2015 which effectively converts fixed-rate interest to variable-rate interest. This swap agreement was designated as a fair value hedge with the resulting fair value adjustments recognized in earnings along with an equally offsetting charge / benefit to earnings for the changes in the fair value of the underlying debt instrument. At June 30, 2013, $26 million was recognized as an increase in the fair value of this note ($32 million at December 31, 2012). On July 5, 2013, Praxair entered into interest-rate swap agreements that convert fixed-rate interest to variable-rate interest on the $475 million 1.25% notes that mature 2018. These interest-rate swaps were designated as fair value hedges.
Terminated Interest Rate Swaps
The following table summarizes information related to terminated interest rate swap contracts:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Terminated | | Original Gain | | Amount of Gain Recognized in Earnings (a) | | Amount of Gain Recognized in Earnings (a) | | Unrecognized Gain (a) |
| Quarter Ended | | Six Months Ended | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying debt instrument (b): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$500 million 2.125% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2013 | 2011 | | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
|
$400 million 1.75% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2012 | 2010 | | 13 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
$500 million 6.375% fixed-rate notes that matured in 2012 | 2002 | | 47 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | | | $ | 78 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
|
| |
(a) | The unrecognized gain for terminated interest rate swaps is shown as an increase to long-term debt and will be recognized on a straight line basis to interest expense - net over the term of the underlying debt agreements. Upon settlement of the underlying interest rate contract, the cash received is reflected within the Noncontrolling interest transactions and other in the financing section of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. |
| |
(b) | The notional amounts of the interest rate contracts are equal to the underlying debt instruments. |
Terminated Treasury Rate Locks
The following table summarizes the unrecognized gains (losses) related to terminated treasury rate lock contracts:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Terminated | | Original Gain / (Loss) | | Unrecognized Gain / (Loss) (a) |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Treasury Rate Locks | | | | | | | |
Underlying debt instrument: | | | | | | | |
$500 million 2.20% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2022 (b) | 2012 | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) |
$500 million 3.00% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2021 (b) | 2011 | | (11 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (10 | ) |
$600 million 4.50% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2019 (b) | 2009 | | 16 |
| | 10 |
| | 11 |
|
$500 million 4.625% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2015 (b) | 2008 | | (7 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Total - pre-tax | | | | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) |
Less: income taxes | | | | | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
After- tax amounts | | | | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) |
| |
(a) | The unrecognized gains / (losses) for the treasury rate locks are shown in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and are being recognized on a straight line basis to interest expense – net over the term of the underlying debt agreements. The cash received or paid was reflected within the noncontrolling interest transactions and other in the financing section of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. Refer to the table below summarizing the impact on the company’s consolidated statements of income and AOCI for current period gain (loss) recognition. |
| |
(b) | The notional amount of the treasury rate lock contracts are equal to the underlying debt instrument with the exception of the treasury rate lock contract entered into to hedge the $600 million 4.50% fixed-rate notes that mature in 2019. The notional amount of this contract was $500 million. |
The following tables summarize the impacts of the company’s derivatives on the consolidated statements of income and AOCI:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amount of Pre-Tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (a) |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | | | | | | |
Currency contracts: | | | | | | | |
Balance sheet items | | | | | | | |
Debt-related | $ | (40 | ) | | $ | (19 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 18 |
|
Other balance sheet items | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (5 | ) |
Anticipated net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) |
Total | $ | (43 | ) | | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | 9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended |
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (b) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income (c) |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 |
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments | | | | | | | |
Currency contracts: | | | | | | | |
Forecasted purchases (b) | $ | — |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | |
Treasury rate locks (b) | — |
| | 7 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
|
Total - pre tax | $ | — |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Less: income taxes | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Total - Net of Taxes | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended |
| Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (b) | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income (c) |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | June 30, 2012 |
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts: | | | | | | | |
Treasury rate locks (b) | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less: income taxes | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Total - Net of Taxes | $ | — |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| |
(a) | The gains (losses) on balance sheet items are offset by gains (losses) recorded on the underlying hedged assets and liabilities. The gains (losses) for the derivatives and the underlying hedged assets and liabilities related to debt items are recorded in the consolidated statements of income as interest expense-net. Other balance sheet items and anticipated net income gains (losses) are recorded in the consolidated statements of income as other income (expenses)-net. |
| |
(b) | The gains (losses) on forecasted purchases and treasury rate locks are recorded as a component of AOCI within derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. There was no ineffectiveness for these instruments during 2013 or 2012. |
| |
(c) | The gains (losses) on forecasted purchases are reclassified to the depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis consistent with the useful life of the underlying asset. The gains (losses) for interest rate contracts are reclassified to earnings as interest expense –net on a straight-line basis over the remaining maturity of the underlying debt. Net losses of $1 million are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months. |
7. Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the input to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value Measurements Using |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
(Millions of dollars) | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
The fair values of the derivative assets and liabilities are based on market prices obtained from independent brokers or determined using quantitative models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters that are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including third-party pricing services, brokers and market transactions.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term debt, accounts receivable-net, and accounts payable approximate carrying amounts because of the short maturities of these instruments. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for similar issues, which is deemed a level 2 measurement. At June 30, 2013, the estimated fair value of Praxair’s long-term debt portfolio was $7,919 million versus a carrying value of $7,872 million. At December 31, 2012, the estimated fair value of Praxair’s long-term debt portfolio was $7,131 million versus a carrying value of $6,724 million. Differences from carrying amounts are attributable to interest-rate changes subsequent to when the debt was issued.
8. Earnings Per Share – Praxair, Inc. Shareholders
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income – Praxair, Inc. for the period by the weighted average number of Praxair common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income – Praxair, Inc. for the period by the weighted average number of Praxair common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents, as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Numerator (Millions of dollars) | | | | | | | |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 445 |
| | $ | 429 |
| | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 848 |
|
Denominator (Thousands of shares) | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | 295,143 |
| | 298,316 |
| | 295,609 |
| | 298,414 |
|
Shares earned and issuable under compensation plans | 525 |
| | 569 |
| | 527 |
| | 567 |
|
Weighted average shares used in basic earnings per share | 295,668 |
| | 298,885 |
| | 296,136 |
| | 298,981 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities | | | | | | | |
Stock options and awards | 2,986 |
| | 3,607 |
| | 3,154 |
| | 3,676 |
|
Weighted average shares used in diluted earnings per share | 298,654 |
| | 302,492 |
| | 299,290 |
| | 302,657 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 1.50 |
| | $ | 1.43 |
| | $ | 2.82 |
| | $ | 2.84 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | $ | 2.79 |
| | $ | 2.80 |
|
Stock options of 780 were antidilutive and therefore excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013. There were no antidilutive shares for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. Stock options of 1,611,500 were antidilutive and therefore excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | North America | | South America | | Europe | | Asia | | Surface Technologies | | Total |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | $ | 1,499 |
| | $ | 195 |
| | $ | 645 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 143 |
| | $ | 2,507 |
|
Acquisitions (Note 3) | 624 |
| | — |
| | 93 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 717 |
|
Purchase adjustments & other | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) |
Foreign currency translation | (8 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (27 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) | | (57 | ) |
Balance, June 30, 2013 | $ | 2,107 |
| | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 711 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 139 |
| | $ | 3,159 |
|
Praxair has performed its goodwill impairment tests annually during the second quarter of each year, and historically we have determined that the fair value of each of our reporting units was substantially in excess of its carrying value. For the 2013 test completed this quarter, Praxair applied the FASB's updated accounting guidance (refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K) which allows the Company to first assess qualitative factors to determine the extent of additional quantitative analysis, if any, that may be required to test goodwill for impairment. Based on the qualitative assessments performed, Praxair concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit substantially exceeded its carrying value and therefore, further quantitative analysis was not required. As a result, no impairment was recorded.
Changes in the carrying amounts of other intangibles for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | Customer & License/Use Agreements | | Non-compete Agreements | | Patents & Other | | Total |
Cost: | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 289 |
|
Additions (Note 3) | 386 |
| | 3 |
| | 30 |
| | 419 |
|
Foreign currency translation | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Other * | 5 |
| | (10 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (12 | ) |
Balance, June 30, 2013 | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 694 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | $ | (89 | ) | | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (116 | ) |
Amortization expense | (15 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (18 | ) |
Foreign currency translation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other * | 2 |
| | 9 |
| | 5 |
| | 16 |
|
Balance, June 30, 2013 | $ | (102 | ) | | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | (118 | ) |
Net Balance at June 30, 2013 | $ | 519 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 576 |
|
* Other primarily relates to the write-off of fully amortized assets and purchase accounting adjustments.
There are no expected residual values related to these intangible assets. The remaining weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets is approximately 20 years.
Total estimated annual amortization expense is as follows:
|
| | | |
(Millions of dollars) | |
Remaining 2013 | $ | 23 |
|
2014 | 44 |
|
2015 | 42 |
|
2016 | 40 |
|
2017 | 35 |
|
Thereafter | 392 |
|
| $ | 576 |
|
10. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation of $17 million ($12 million after-tax) and $18 million ($13 million after-tax) was recognized during the quarters ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Share-based compensation of $34 million ($23 million after-tax) and $35 million ($24 million after-tax) was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The expense was recorded primarily in selling, general and administrative expenses. There was no share-based compensation cost that was capitalized. For further details regarding Praxair’s share-based compensation arrangements and prior year grants, refer to Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Stock Options
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $16.31 ($17.43 in 2012) based on the Black-Scholes Options-Pricing model. The decrease in grant date fair value year-over-year is primarily attributable to the impacts of volatility and dividend yield.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used for grants in 2013 and 2012 :
|
| | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Dividend yield | 2.2 | % | | 2.0 | % |
Volatility | 21.7 | % | | 22.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | 0.76 | % | | 0.86 | % |
Expected term years | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
The following table summarizes option activity under the plans as of June 30, 2013 and changes during the six months period then ended (averages are calculated on a weighted basis; life in years; intrinsic value expressed in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Options (000’s) | | Average Exercise Price | | Average Remaining Life | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding at January 1, 2013 | 12,281 |
| | $ | 74.05 |
| | | | |
Granted | 1,308 |
| | 110.58 |
| | | | |
Exercised | (1,178 | ) | | 56.91 |
| | | | |
Cancelled or Expired | (27 | ) | | 100.43 |
| | | | |
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 | 12,384 |
| | 79.48 |
| | 5.7 | | $ | 442 |
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2013 | 9,450 |
| | $ | 70.86 |
| | 4.8 | | $ | 419 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the company’s closing stock price of $115.16 as of June 30, 2013 and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding as of that date. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $39 million and $68 million, respectively ($40 million and $114 million during the same time periods in 2012, respectively).
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $38 million and $67 million ($29 million and $98 million for the same time periods in 2012, respectively). The cash tax benefit realized from share-based compensation totaled $9 million and $35 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, of which $24 million in excess tax benefits was classified as financing cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 ($15 million and $61 million tax benefit for the same periods in 2012 of which $44 million represented excess tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2012).
As of June 30, 2013, $34 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.0 year.
Performance-Based and Restricted Stock Awards
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the company granted performance-based stock units to employees which vest on the third anniversary of their grant date. The actual number of shares issued in settlement of a vested award can range from zero to 200 percent of the target number of shares granted based upon the company’s attainment of specified performance targets at the end of a three year period. Compensation expense related to these awards is recognized over the three-year performance period based on the fair value of the closing market price of the company’s common stock on the date of the grant and the estimated performance that will be achieved. Compensation expense will be adjusted during the three-year performance period based upon the estimated performance levels that will be achieved.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the company also granted restricted stock units to employees. The majority of the restricted stock units vest at the end of a three year service period. Compensation expense related to the restricted stock units is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The weighted-average fair value of performance-based stock and restricted stock units granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $103.46 and $105.51, respectively, ($103.13 and $108.60 for the same periods in 2012). This is based on the closing market price of Praxair’s common stock on the grant date adjusted for dividends that will not be paid during the vesting period.
The following table summarizes non-vested performance-based and restricted stock award activity as of June 30, 2013 and changes during the six months then ended (shares based on target amounts, averages are calculated on a weighted basis):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Performance-Based | | Restricted Stock |
| Number of Shares (000’s) | | Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Number of Shares (000’s) | | Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Non-vested at January 1, 2013 | 840 |
| | $ | 88.83 |
| | 368 |
| | $ | 89.89 |
|
Granted (a) | 416 |
| | 103.46 |
| | 115 |
| | 105.51 |
|
Vested | (371 | ) | | 70.91 |
| | (125 | ) | | 75.93 |
|
Cancelled | (7 | ) | | 100.65 |
| | (3 | ) | | 96.28 |
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2013 | 878 |
| | $ | 99.58 |
| | 355 |
| | $ | 99.96 |
|
| |
(a) | Performance-based stock unit grants during 2013 include 98 thousand shares relating to the actual payout of the 2010 PSU grants in 2013. |
As of June 30, 2013, based on current estimates of future performance, $46 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to performance-based awards is expected to be recognized through the first quarter of 2016 and $20 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized primarily through the fourth quarter of 2017.
11. Retirement Programs
The components of net pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions (“OPEB”) costs for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Pensions | | OPEB | | Pensions | | OPEB |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Service cost | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
Interest cost | 29 |
| | 30 |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 58 |
| | 61 |
| | 6 |
| | 6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (38 | ) | | (39 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (76 | ) | | (78 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Net amortization and deferral | 24 |
| | 17 |
| | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 47 |
| | 34 |
| | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 5 |
|
Praxair estimates that 2013 contributions to its pension plans will be in the area of $50 million, of which $43 million have been made through June 30, 2013.
In 2012 a number of senior managers retired. These retirees are covered by the U.S. supplemental pension plan which provides for a lump sum benefit payment option. Under certain circumstances, such lump sum payments must be accounted for as a settlement of the related pension obligation, but only when paid. As a result, Praxair anticipates that it will record a pension settlement expense of approximately $9 million in the third quarter 2013 when the payments are made to the retirees.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingent Liabilities
Praxair is subject to various lawsuits and government investigations that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. These actions are based upon alleged environmental, tax, antitrust and personal injury claims, among others. Praxair has strong defenses in these cases and intends to defend itself vigorously. It is possible that the company may incur losses in connection with some of these actions in excess of accrued liabilities. Management does not anticipate that in the aggregate such losses would have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position or liquidity; however, it is possible that the final outcomes could have a significant impact on the company’s reported results of operations in any given period (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Among such matters are:
| |
• | Claims by the Brazilian taxing authorities against several of the company’s Brazilian subsidiaries relating to non-income and income tax matters. |
During May 2009, the Brazilian government published Law 11941/2009 instituting a new voluntary amnesty program (“Refis Program”) which allowed Brazilian companies to settle certain federal tax disputes at reduced amounts. During the 2009 third quarter, Praxair decided that it was economically beneficial to settle many of its outstanding federal tax disputes and these disputes were enrolled in the Refis Program and settled. The final settlement related to the Refis Program is subject to final calculation and review by the Brazilian federal government and, although the timing is very difficult to estimate, it is possible that this review could be concluded during the next year. Any differences from amounts recorded will be adjusted to income at that time.
After enrollment in the amnesty programs, at June 30, 2013 the most significant remaining claims relate to state VAT tax matters associated with procedural issues and a federal income tax matter where the taxing authorities are challenging the tax rate that should be applied to income generated by a subsidiary company. The total estimated exposure relating to such claims, including interest and penalties, as appropriate, is approximately $190 million. Praxair has not recorded any liabilities related to such claims based on management judgments, after considering judgments and opinions of outside counsel. Because litigation in Brazil historically takes many years to resolve, it is very difficult to estimate the timing of resolution of these matters; however, it is possible that certain of these matters may be resolved within the near term. The company is vigorously defending against the proceedings.
| |
• | On September 1, 2010, CADE (Brazilian Administrative Council for Economic Defense) announced alleged anticompetitive activity on the part of five industrial gas companies in Brazil and imposed fines on all five companies. Originally, CADE imposed a civil fine of R$2.2 billion Brazilian reais (US$1.0 billion) against White Martins, the Brazil-based subsidiary of Praxair, Inc. In response to a motion for clarification, the fine was reduced to R$1.7 billion Brazilian reais (US$765 million) due to a calculation error made by CADE. On September 2, 2010, Praxair issued a press release and filed a report on Form 8-K rejecting all claims and stating that the fine represents a gross and arbitrary disregard of Brazilian law. |
On October 19, 2010, White Martins filed an annulment petition (“appeal”) with the Federal Court in Brasilia seeking to have the fine against White Martins entirely overturned. In order to suspend payment of the fine pending the completion of the appeal process, Brazilian law required that the company tender a form of guarantee in the amount of the fine as security. Currently, 50% of the guarantee is satisfied by letters of credit with a financial institution and 50% of the guarantee is satisfied by equity of a Brazilian subsidiary.
Praxair strongly believes that the allegations are without merit and that the fine will be entirely overturned during the appeal process. The company further believes that it has strong defenses and will vigorously defend against the allegations and related fine up to such levels of the Federal Courts in Brazil as may be necessary. Because appeals in Brazil historically take many years to resolve, it is very difficult to estimate when the appeal will be finally decided. Based on management judgments, after considering judgments and opinions of outside counsel, no reserve has been recorded for this proceeding as management does not believe that a loss is probable.
Contractual Obligations Update
The following table sets forth an update to Praxair’s material unconditional purchase obligations as of June 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Expiring through December 31, |
(Millions of dollars) | | 2013 Remaining | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | Thereafter | | Total |
Unconditional Purchase Obligations | | $ | 351 |
| | $ | 516 |
| | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 403 |
| | $ | 387 |
| | $ | 3,763 |
| | $ | 5,857 |
|
Unconditional purchase obligations represent contractual commitments under various long- and short-term take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers and are not included on Praxair's balance sheet. These obligations are primarily minimum-purchase commitments for helium, electricity, natural gas, and feedstock used to produce atmospheric and process gases. A significant portion of these obligations is passed on to customers through similar take-or-pay or other contractual arrangements. Purchase obligations that are not passed along to customers through such contractual arrangements are subject to market conditions, but do not represent a material risk to Praxair.
$3,974 million of these purchase obligations relate to power and are intended to secure the uninterrupted supply of electricity and feedstock to our plants in order for Praxair to reliably satisfy customer product supply obligations, and extend through 2030. Certain of the power contracts contain various cancellation provisions requiring supplier agreement which the company believes could reduce the reported obligation significantly, if desired, and many are subject to annual escalations based on local inflation factors. The purchase obligations also include a multi-year contract for silane, with a total purchase obligation of $175 million at June 30, 2013. Since this contract was signed, the market for silane has not developed as expected and prices have decreased due to lower demand from photovoltaics and consumer electronics markets, primarily in Asia. At June 30,
2013, Praxair's current selling prices and estimated future demand for silane are in excess of its contractual purchase obligations under the contract, as amended. The company is continuously monitoring market developments.
13. Segments
Sales and operating profit by segment for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are shown below. For a description of Praxair’s operating segments, refer to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
SALES(a) | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 1,552 |
| | $ | 1,393 |
| | $ | 3,009 |
| | $ | 2,791 |
|
Europe | 382 |
| | 382 |
| | 752 |
| | 759 |
|
South America | 536 |
| | 520 |
| | 1,067 |
| | 1,082 |
|
Asia | 379 |
| | 348 |
| | 746 |
| | 682 |
|
Surface Technologies | 165 |
| | 168 |
| | 328 |
| | 337 |
|
Total sales | $ | 3,014 |
| | $ | 2,811 |
| | $ | 5,902 |
| | $ | 5,651 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
OPERATING PROFIT | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 381 |
| | $ | 363 |
| | $ | 739 |
| | $ | 724 |
|
Europe | 69 |
| | 68 |
| | 131 |
| | 136 |
|
South America | 123 |
| | 110 |
| | 237 |
| | 225 |
|
Asia | 61 |
| | 68 |
| | 124 |
| | 125 |
|
Surface Technologies | 31 |
| | 27 |
| | 57 |
| | 53 |
|
Segment operating profit | 665 |
| | 636 |
| | 1,288 |
| | 1,263 |
|
Venezuela currency devaluation (Note 2) | — |
| | — |
| | (23 | ) | | — |
|
Total operating profit | $ | 665 |
| | $ | 636 |
| | $ | 1,265 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
|
| |
(a) | Intersegment sales, primarily from North America to other segments, were not significant for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. |
14. Equity and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Equity
A summary of the changes in total equity for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is provided below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | Quarter Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Activity | Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity | | Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity |
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 6,169 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 6,526 |
| | $ | 5,940 |
| | $ | 327 |
| | $ | 6,267 |
|
Net income (a) | 445 |
| | 9 |
| | 454 |
| | 429 |
| | 10 |
| | 439 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (386 | ) | | — |
| | (386 | ) | | (520 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (535 | ) |
Noncontrolling interests: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and other capital changes | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (43 | ) | | (43 | ) |
Redemption value adjustments | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Dividends to Praxair, Inc. common stock holders ($0.60 per share in 2013 and $0.55 per share in 2012) | (177 | ) | | — |
| | (177 | ) | | (164 | ) | | — |
| | (164 | ) |
Issuances of common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
For employee savings and incentive plans | 43 |
| | — |
| | 43 |
| | 30 |
| | — |
| | 30 |
|
Purchases of common stock | (187 | ) | | — |
| | (187 | ) | | (131 | ) | | — |
| | (131 | ) |
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | 11 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 15 |
| | — |
| | 15 |
|
Share-based compensation | 17 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
| | 18 |
| | — |
| | 18 |
|
Balance, end of period | $ | 5,928 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 6,285 |
| | $ | 5,615 |
| | $ | 279 |
| | $ | 5,894 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Activity | Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity | | Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity |
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 6,064 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 6,421 |
| | $ | 5,488 |
| | $ | 309 |
| | $ | 5,797 |
|
Net income (a) | 836 |
| | 19 |
| | 855 |
| | 848 |
| | 18 |
| | 866 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (383 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (386 | ) | | (246 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (255 | ) |
Noncontrolling interests: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends and other capital changes | — |
| | (16 | ) | | (16 | ) | | — |
| | (39 | ) | | (39 | ) |
Redemption value adjustments | (13 | ) | | — |
| | (13 | ) | | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) |
Dividends to Praxair, Inc. common stock holders ($1.20 per share in 2013 and $1.10 per share in 2012) | (355 | ) | | — |
| | (355 | ) | | (328 | ) | | — |
| | (328 | ) |
Issuances of common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan | 3 |
| | | | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
For employee savings and incentive plans | 60 |
| | — |
| | 60 |
| | 88 |
| | — |
| | 88 |
|
Purchases of common stock | (343 | ) | | — |
| | (343 | ) | | (313 | ) | | — |
| | (313 | ) |
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | 25 |
| | — |
| | 25 |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| | 46 |
|
Share-based compensation | 34 |
| | — |
| | 34 |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | 35 |
|
Balance, end of period | $ | 5,928 |
| | $ | 357 |
| | $ | 6,285 |
| | $ | 5,615 |
| | $ | 279 |
| | $ | 5,894 |
|
| |
(a) | Net income for noncontrolling interests excludes Net income related to redeemable noncontrolling interests of $7 million and $12 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 ($5 million and $10 million for the same time periods in 2012, respectively), which is not part of total equity (see redeemable noncontrolling interests section below). |
The components of AOCI are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, | | December 31, |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 |
Cumulative translation adjustments (CTA) | $ | (1,456 | ) | | $ | (1,044 | ) |
Derivative instruments | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) |
Funded status - retirement obligations | (766 | ) | | (792 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (2,227 | ) | | (1,841 | ) |
Noncontrolling interests (CTA) | 8 |
| | 11 |
|
AOCI - Praxair, Inc. | $ | (2,235 | ) | | $ | (1,852 | ) |
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests with redemption features, such as put/sell options, that are not solely within the Company’s control (“redeemable noncontrolling interests”) are reported separately in the consolidated balance sheets at the greater of carrying value or redemption value. For redeemable noncontrolling interests that are not yet exercisable, Praxair calculates the redemption value by accreting the carrying value to the redemption value over the period until exercisable. If the redemption value is greater than the carrying value, any increase is adjusted directly to retained earnings and does not impact net income.
The following is a summary of the changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | 2013 | | 2012 |
Balance, January 1, | $ | 252 |
| | $ | 220 |
|
Net income | 12 |
| | 10 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest | (7 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Redemption value adjustment/accretion | 13 |
| | 6 |
|
Foreign currency translation and other | (11 | ) | | — |
|
Balance, June 30, | $ | 259 |
| | $ | 232 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Adjusted Amounts and Comparisons
The discussion of consolidated results and outlook in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) as it relates to the six month period ended June 30, is based on adjusted amounts for the first quarter of 2013 which exclude the impact of a 32% currency devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar versus the U.S. Dollar (see Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). The adjusted amounts for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 are non-GAAP measures that supplement an understanding of the company’s financial information by presenting information that investors, financial analysts and management use to help evaluate the company’s performance and ongoing business trends on a comparable basis. See the “Consolidated Results” section of this MD&A for a summary of these adjusted amounts. A reconciliation of reported amounts to adjusted amounts can be found in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this MD&A.
Consolidated Results
Sales grew 7% in the second quarter from the prior-year period. Underlying sales growth was 4%, from higher volumes and higher pricing. Strong volume growth in Asia and South America was mitigated by slightly lower volumes in Europe and the surface technologies segment. Overall volumes in North America were comparable to the prior year. Acquisitions, primarily NuCO2, contributed 3% sales growth. Gross margin increased 8% from the prior-year period. Operating profit and earnings per share grew 5% year-over-year from higher volumes, pricing, and productivity gains, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense and SG&A expense due to new plant start-ups and acquisitions. The following table provides summary data for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
Reported Amounts | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | $ | 3,014 |
| | $ | 2,811 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 5,902 |
| | $ | 5,651 |
| | 4 | % |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | $ | 1,710 |
| | $ | 1,602 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 3,348 |
| | $ | 3,218 |
| | 4 | % |
Gross margin | $ | 1,304 |
| | $ | 1,209 |
| | 8 | % | | $ | 2,554 |
| | $ | 2,433 |
| | 5 | % |
As a percent of sales | 43.3 | % | | 43.0 | % | | | | 43.3 | % | | 43.1 | % | | |
Selling, general and administrative | $ | 344 |
| | $ | 310 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 681 |
| | $ | 645 |
| | 6 | % |
As a percent of sales | 11.4 | % | | 11.0 | % | | | | 11.5 | % | | 11.4 | % | | |
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 275 |
| | $ | 247 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 541 |
| | $ | 499 |
| | 8 | % |
Venezuela currency devaluation (a) | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % | | $ | 23 |
| | $ | — |
| | 100 | % |
Other income (expense) - net | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | |
Operating profit | $ | 665 |
| | $ | 636 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 1,265 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | — | % |
As a percent of sales | 22.1 | % | | 22.6 | % | | | | 21.4 | % | | 22.4 | % | | |
Interest expense - net | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | 24 | % | | $ | 81 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | 16 | % |
Effective tax rate | 27.9 | % | | 28.0 | % | | | | 28.5 | % | | 28.0 | % | | |
Income from equity investments | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | 24 | % |
Noncontrolling interests | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | (15 | ) | | 7 | % | | $ | (31 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | 11 | % |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 445 |
| | $ | 429 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | (1 | )% |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 2.79 |
| | $ | 2.80 |
| | — | % |
Diluted shares outstanding | 298,654 |
| | 302,492 |
| | (1 | )% | | 299,290 |
| | 302,657 |
| | (1 | )% |
Adjusted Amounts for 2013 (a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating profit | $ | 665 |
| | $ | 636 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 1,288 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | 2 | % |
As a percent of sales | 22.1 | % | | 22.6 | % | | | | 21.8 | % | | 22.4 | % | | |
Effective tax rate | 27.9 | % | | 28.0 | % | | | | 28.0 | % | | 28.0 | % | | |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 445 |
| | $ | 429 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | 1 | % |
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 1.42 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 2.80 |
| | 3 | % |
| |
(a) | Adjusted amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2013 are non-GAAP measures and are presented to facilitate comparisons with 2012, which are not adjusted. The non-GAAP adjustment for 2013 relates to the impact of the first quarter Venezuela currency devaluation (See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). A reconciliation of reported amounts to adjusted amounts can be found in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this MD&A. |
Results of Operations
As previously described, references to “adjusted” amounts refer to reported amounts adjusted to exclude the impact of special items and are non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation of reported amounts to adjusted amounts can be found in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this MD&A.
The change in consolidated sales and adjusted operating profit compared to the prior year is attributable to the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Adjusted Operating Profit | | Sales | | Adjusted Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume | 2 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | (3 | )% |
Price | 2 | % | | 8 | % | | 1 | % | | 9 | % |
Cost pass-through | 1 | % | | — | % | | 1 | % | | — | % |
Currency | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | — | % |
Acquisitions/divestitures | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 2 | % | | 2 | % |
Other | — | % | | (6 | )% | | — | % | | (6 | )% |
| 7 | % | | 5 | % | | 4 | % | | 2 | % |
The following tables provide sales by end-market and distribution method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change | | % of Sales | | % Change |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales* | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales* |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 24 | % | | 26 | % | | 2 | % | | 25 | % | | 25 | % | | 2 | % |
Metals | 17 | % | | 18 | % | | 5 | % | | 18 | % | | 18 | % | | 5 | % |
Energy | 12 | % | | 11 | % | | 8 | % | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 6 | % |
Chemicals | 11 | % | | 10 | % | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 10 | % | | 8 | % |
Electronics | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | (1 | )% | | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | (2 | )% |
Healthcare | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | 6 | % | | 8 | % | | 8 | % | | 5 | % |
Food & Beverage | 8 | % | | 6 | % | | 1 | % | | 7 | % | | 6 | % | | (1 | )% |
Aerospace | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 2 | % | | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 1 | % |
Other | 9 | % | | 10 | % | | — | % | | 9 | % | | 11 | % | | (3 | )% |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
| |
* | Excludes impact of currency, natural gas/precious metals cost pass-through and acquisitions/divestitures. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % of Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Sales by Distribution Method | | | | | | | |
On- Site | 26 | % | | 25 | % | | 26 | % | | 25 | % |
Merchant | 32 | % | | 31 | % | | 32 | % | | 31 | % |
Packaged Gas | 28 | % | | 29 | % | | 28 | % | | 29 | % |
Other | 14 | % | | 15 | % | | 14 | % | | 15 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Sales grew $203 million, or 7%, in the second quarter ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. Underlying sales in the quarter grew 4% from higher pricing and volume growth. By end-market, sales growth was strongest to energy, metals and chemicals customers, as compared to the prior-year quarter. For the six-month period sales grew $251 million, or 4%. Underlying sales growth of 2% from higher pricing, and volume growth in Asia and South America from new project start-ups was offset by lower volumes in other geographic segments, primarily Europe, and weaker volumes to the electronics end-market. Acquisitions, including NuCO2 and Dominion Technology Gases, contributed 3% and 2% to sales growth in the quarter and six-month periods, respectively. The impacts of foreign currency translation and cost pass-through in both periods was not material.
Gross margin in 2013 increased $95 million, or 8%, for the second quarter and increased $121 million, or 5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 periods primarily due to higher pricing. Gross margin as a percentage of sales for the second quarter and six-month periods increased modestly versus the respective prior-year periods.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $34 million, or 11%, in the second quarter and $36 million, or 6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 periods. The increase was due primarily to increased pension and other benefit costs, and acquisitions, partially offset by benefits from cost reduction and currency impacts.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $28 million, or 11%, for the second quarter and increased $42 million, or 8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 periods. Depreciation and amortization increased in both periods due to new project start-ups and acquisitions.
Other income (expense) – net was $4 million benefit for the quarter as compared to $9 million in the prior-year. For the year-to date period, other income was $4 million as compared to $23 million. The 2012 year-to-date period included among other items, gains from litigation settlements in South America and a land sale in Korea, partially offset by business restructuring costs in South America.
Operating profit increased $29 million, or 5%, for the second quarter 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. The increase in operating profit for the second quarter was driven by higher pricing, volumes, acquisitions, and productivity gains, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization and SGA expense, as discussed above. Adjusted operating profit increased $25 million, or 2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. In the six-month period, growth from higher pricing, acquisitions and productivity gains was partially offset by the impact on volumes of fewer working days, product mix and higher cost. A discussion of operating profit by segment is included in the segment discussion that follows.
Interest expense-net increased $8 million, or 24%, for the second quarter and $11 million, or 16%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective periods in 2012. The increase was due to higher debt levels incurred primarily to fund acquisitions and capital expenditures.
The adjusted effective tax rate for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately 28.0%.
Praxair’s significant sources of equity income are in China, Italy, and the Middle East. Income from equity investments increased $1 million in the second quarter and increased $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 periods. The increase in both periods was due primarily to higher earnings in China resulting from stronger volumes.
At June 30, 2013, non-controlling interests consisted primarily of non-controlling shareholders' investments in Asia (primarily China and India), Europe (primarily Italy and Scandinavia), and North America (primarily within the US packaged gas business). Non-controlling interests increased $1 million for the second quarter and increased $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective periods in 2012 due to higher earnings of these entities.
Net income-Praxair, Inc. increased $16 million, or 4%, for the second quarter 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. Adjusted net income-Praxair, Inc. increased $11 million, or 1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. The increase in both periods are due to higher operating profit partially offset by increased interest expense.
Adjusted diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) increased $0.07 in both the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, versus the respective periods in 2012. The increase in adjusted EPS in both periods is attributable to higher net income - Praxair, Inc. during the quarter and the reduction in the number of diluted shares outstanding as a result of the company's net repurchases of common stock.
Comprehensive income for the 2013 second quarter of $65 million includes a negative currency adjustment of $393 million, reflecting the impact of translating foreign subsidiary balance sheets to U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of June 30, 2013. In the 2012 quarter, this currency impact was a negative $548 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the currency translation adjustment impact was a negative $412 million versus $276 million in the comparable 2012 period.
Segment Discussion
The following summary of sales and operating profit by segment provides a basis for the discussion that follows.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Dollar amounts in millions) | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
SALES | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 1,552 |
| | $ | 1,393 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 3,009 |
| | $ | 2,791 |
| | 8 | % |
Europe | 382 |
| | 382 |
| | — | % | | 752 |
| | 759 |
| | (1 | )% |
South America | 536 |
| | 520 |
| | 3 | % | | 1,067 |
| | 1,082 |
| | (1 | )% |
Asia | 379 |
| | 348 |
| | 9 | % | | 746 |
| | 682 |
| | 9 | % |
Surface Technologies | 165 |
| | 168 |
| | (2 | )% | | 328 |
| | 337 |
| | (3 | )% |
| $ | 3,014 |
| | $ | 2,811 |
| | | | $ | 5,902 |
| | $ | 5,651 |
| | |
OPERATING PROFIT | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 381 |
| | $ | 363 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 739 |
| | $ | 724 |
| | 2 | % |
Europe | 69 |
| | 68 |
| | 1 | % | | 131 |
| | 136 |
| | (4 | )% |
South America | 123 |
| | 110 |
| | 12 | % | | 237 |
| | 225 |
| | 5 | % |
Asia | 61 |
| | 68 |
| | (10 | )% | | 124 |
| | 125 |
| | (1 | )% |
Surface Technologies | 31 |
| | 27 |
| | 15 | % | | 57 |
| | 53 |
| | 8 | % |
Segment operating profit | 665 |
| | 636 |
| |
|
| | 1,288 |
| | 1,263 |
| | |
Venezuela currency devaluation (Note 2) | — |
| | — |
| | | | (23 | ) | | — |
| | |
Total operating profit | $ | 665 |
| | $ | 636 |
| | | | $ | 1,265 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | |
North America
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
Sales | $ | 1,552 |
| | $ | 1,393 |
| | 11 | % | | $ | 3,009 |
| | $ | 2,791 |
| | 8 | % |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 843 |
| | 742 |
| | | | 1,615 |
| | 1,483 |
| | |
Gross margin | 709 |
| | 651 |
| | | | 1,394 |
| | 1,308 |
| | |
Operating expenses | 189 |
| | 167 |
| | | | 383 |
| | 338 |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | 139 |
| | 121 |
| | | | 272 |
| | 246 |
| | |
Operating profit | $ | 381 |
| | $ | 363 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 739 |
| | $ | 724 |
| | 2 | % |
Margin % | 24.5 | % | | 26.1 | % | | | | 24.6 | % | | 25.9 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Operating Profit | | Sales | | Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume | — | % | | — | % | | (1 | )% | | (4 | )% |
Price | 2 | % | | 10 | % | | 2 | % | | 11 | % |
Cost pass-through | 3 | % | | — | % | | 3 | % | | — | % |
Currency | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Acquisitions/divestitures | 6 | % | | 5 | % | | 4 | % | | 3 | % |
Other | — | % | | (10 | )% | | — | % | | (8 | )% |
| 11 | % | | 5 | % | | 8 | % | | 2 | % |
The following tables provide sales by end-market and distribution method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change | | % of Sales | | % Change |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 30 | % | | 33 | % | | 3 | % | | 31 | % | | 32 | % | | 3 | % |
Metals | 12 | % | | 14 | % | | 1 | % | | 13 | % | | 14 | % | | 1 | % |
Energy | 17 | % | | 16 | % | | 6 | % | | 17 | % | | 16 | % | | 4 | % |
Chemicals | 11 | % | | 10 | % | | 9 | % | | 10 | % | | 11 | % | | 5 | % |
Electronics | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | 3 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | (4 | )% |
Healthcare | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 1 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | — | % |
Food & Beverage | 9 | % | | 5 | % | | 3 | % | | 7 | % | | 5 | % | | (1 | )% |
Aerospace | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 5 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 8 | % |
Other | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | (5 | )% | | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | (7 | )% |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % of Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Sales by Distribution Method | | | | | | | |
On- Site | 27 | % | | 27 | % | | 26 | % | | 27 | % |
Merchant | 34 | % | | 32 | % | | 34 | % | | 32 | % |
Packaged Gas | 32 | % | | 34 | % | | 33 | % | | 34 | % |
Other | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
North America segment sales increased 11% in the quarter as compared to the prior year. Higher cost pass-through, primarily higher natural gas prices passed through to hydrogen customers, increased sales by 3%. Underlying sales growth was 2%, from higher pricing with overall volumes flat versus the prior year. Sales grew to energy, chemicals and general manufacturing markets. Acquisitions added 6% sales growth. For the year-to-date period, sales grew 8%. Underlying sales growth of 1% came from higher pricing. Sales growth to the energy, chemical and general manufacturing markets was partially offset by lower sales to the electronics market. Acquisitions added 4% growth, and cost-pass-through 3%.
North America segment operating profit increased $18 million, or 5%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. This increase was primarily driven by higher pricing and acquisitions which were partially offset by higher costs. Operating profit increased $15 million, or 2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. This increase in operating profit from higher pricing and acquisitions was largely offset by lower volumes and higher costs.
Europe
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance % | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance % |
Sales | $ | 382 |
| | $ | 382 |
| | — | % | | $ | 752 |
| | $ | 759 |
| | (1 | )% |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 216 |
| | 217 |
| | | | 429 |
| | 430 |
| | |
Gross margin | 166 |
| | 165 |
| | | | 323 |
| | 329 |
| | |
Operating expenses | 56 |
| | 60 |
| | | | 110 |
| | 118 |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | 41 |
| | 37 |
| | | | 82 |
| | 75 |
| | |
Operating profit | $ | 69 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | 1 | % | | $ | 131 |
| | $ | 136 |
| | (4 | )% |
Margin % | 18.1 | % | | 17.8 | % | | | | 17.4 | % | | 17.9 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change | | % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Operating Profit | | Sales | | Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume | (1 | )% | | (15 | )% | | (2 | )% | | (20 | )% |
Price | 1 | % | | 6 | % | | — | % | | 7 | % |
Cost pass-through | (2 | )% | | — | % | | (1 | )% | | — | % |
Currency | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 2 | % |
Acquisitions/divestitures | 1 | % | | — | % | | 1 | % | | — | % |
Other | — | % | | 9 | % | | — | % | | 7 | % |
| — | % | | 1 | % | | (1 | )% | | (4 | )% |
The following tables provide sales by end-market and distribution method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change | | % of Sales | | % Change |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 21 | % | | 23 | % | | (9 | )% | | 22 | % | | 23 | % | | (7 | )% |
Metals | 16 | % | | 17 | % | | (4 | )% | | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | — | % |
Energy | 5 | % | | 3 | % | | 15 | % | | 4 | % | | 3 | % | | 15 | % |
Chemicals | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | (1 | )% | | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | (2 | )% |
Electronics | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | (1 | )% | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 3 | % |
Healthcare | 11 | % | | 10 | % | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 2 | % |
Food & Beverage | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | (6 | )% | | 9 | % | | 9 | % | | (4 | )% |
Aerospace | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | — | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | — | % |
Other | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | — | % | | 12 | % | | 12 | % | | (7 | )% |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % of Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Sales by Distribution Method | | | | | | | |
On- Site | 19 | % | | 19 | % | | 20 | % | | 20 | % |
Merchant | 34 | % | | 33 | % | | 34 | % | | 33 | % |
Packaged Gas | 42 | % | | 43 | % | | 41 | % | | 42 | % |
Other | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % | | 5 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Europe segment sales of $382 million were comparable to the prior-year quarter. Cost pass-through reduced sales in the quarter by 2%. Moderately higher pricing was offset by lower volumes, primarily in Spain and Italy. Acquisitions added 1% to sales. For the six month period sales decreased 1% from the prior year due to lower overall volumes resulting from slower economic activity, primarily in Southern Europe.
Europe segment operating profit increased by $1 million, or 1%, for the second quarter. The impact of lower volumes was offset by higher pricing and lower costs. For the six-month period, operating profit decreased 4% from prior year due to the impact of lower volumes, partially offset by the favorable impact of higher pricing and lower costs.
South America
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
Sales | 536 |
| | $ | 520 |
| | 3 | % | | 1,067 |
| | $ | 1,082 |
| | (1 | )% |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 296 |
| | 300 |
| | | | 596 |
| | 627 |
| | |
Gross margin | 240 |
| | 220 |
| | | | 471 |
| | 455 |
| | |
Operating expenses | 71 |
| | 64 |
| | | | 140 |
| | 136 |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | 46 |
| | 46 |
| | | | 94 |
| | 94 |
| | |
Operating profit | 123 |
| | $ | 110 |
| | 12 | % | | 237 |
| | $ | 225 |
| | 5 | % |
Margin % | 22.9 | % | | 21.2 | % | | | | 22.2 | % | | 20.8 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change | | % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Operating Profit | | Sales | | Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume | 6 | % | | 12 | % | | 4 | % | | 5 | % |
Price | 3 | % | | 12 | % | | 2 | % | | 9 | % |
Cost pass-through | — | % | | — | % | | 1 | % | | — | % |
Currency | (6 | )% | | (6 | )% | | (8 | )% | | (8 | )% |
Acquisitions/divestitures | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Other | — | % | | (6 | )% | | — | % | | (1 | )% |
| 3 | % | | 12 | % | | (1 | )% | | 5 | % |
The following tables provide sales by end-market and distribution method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change Organic Sales | | % of Sales | | % Change Organic Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 21 | % | | 22 | % | | 4 | % | | 22 | % | | 23 | % | | 3 | % |
Metals | 29 | % | | 29 | % | | 9 | % | | 29 | % | | 28 | % | | 8 | % |
Energy | 3 | % | | 5 | % | | 15 | % | | 3 | % | | 4 | % | | 11 | % |
Chemicals | 8 | % | | 5 | % | | 21 | % | | 8 | % | | 5 | % | | 16 | % |
Electronics | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Healthcare | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | 9 | % | | 16 | % | | 16 | % | | 11 | % |
Food & Beverage | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 9 | % | | 11 | % | | 12 | % | | 4 | % |
Aerospace | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — |
|
Other | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 8 | % | | 11 | % | | 12 | % | | 1 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % of Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Sales by Distribution Method | | | | | | | |
On- Site | 24 | % | | 24 | % | | 24 | % | | 23 | % |
Merchant | 37 | % | | 37 | % | | 37 | % | | 38 | % |
Packaged Gas | 26 | % | | 26 | % | | 26 | % | | 26 | % |
Other | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | 13 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
South America segment sales in the second quarter increased $16 million or 3% versus the prior year. Excluding unfavorable currency translation impacts, sales grew 9% from higher volumes primarily to merchant and packaged gas customers and higher overall pricing. Sales growth came from most major end-markets including metals, manufacturing, chemicals, healthcare and food and beverage. For the six-month period sales decreased $15 million, or 1% from 2012. Underlying sales growth excluding negative currency impact and cost pass-through was 6% due to higher volumes and higher pricing.
South America segment operating profit increased $13 million, or 12%, in the second quarter and 18% excluding currency effects from higher volumes and higher pricing. For the six months operating profit grew 13% excluding unfavorable currency impacts. The favorable operating leverage was due to volume growth and higher pricing across the region. Depreciation and amortization was comparable to the prior year as the start up of new on-site production facilities was offset by currency impacts.
Asia
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
Sales | $ | 379 |
| | $ | 348 |
| | 9 | % | | $ | 746 |
| | $ | 682 |
| | 9 | % |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 250 |
| | 233 |
| | | | 496 |
| | 458 |
| | |
Gross margin | 129 |
| | 115 |
| | | | 250 |
| | 224 |
| | |
Operating expenses | 30 |
| | 15 |
| | | | 54 |
| | 36 |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | 38 |
| | 32 |
| | | | 72 |
| | 63 |
| | |
Operating profit | $ | 61 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | (10 | )% | | $ | 124 |
| | $ | 125 |
| | (1 | )% |
Margin % | 16.1 | % | | 19.5 | % | | | | 16.6 | % | | 18.3 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change | | % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Operating Profit | | Sales | | Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume | 10 | % | | 15 | % | | 10 | % | | 14 | % |
Price | (1 | )% | | (5 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (4 | )% |
Cost pass-through | (1 | )% | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Currency | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Acquisitions/divestitures | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Other | — | % | | (21 | )% | | — | % | | (11 | )% |
| 9 | % | | (10 | )% | | 9 | % | | (1 | )% |
The following tables provide sales by end-market and distribution method:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change Organic Sales | | % of Sales | | % Change Organic Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 13 | % | | 12 | % | | 16 | % | | 12 | % | | 12 | % | | 10 | % |
Metals | 26 | % | | 24 | % | | 13 | % | | 26 | % | | 25 | % | | 16 | % |
Energy | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Chemicals | 13 | % | | 10 | % | | 33 | % | | 13 | % | | 11 | % | | 31 | % |
Electronics | 33 | % | | 38 | % | | (3 | )% | | 34 | % | | 38 | % | | (1 | )% |
Healthcare | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 19 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | 23 | % |
Food & Beverage | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | (22 | )% | | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | (17 | )% |
Aerospace | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Other | 11 | % | | 12 | % | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | 10 | % | | 14 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % of Sales |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Sales by Distribution Method | | | | | | | |
On- Site | 46 | % | | 40 | % | | 46 | % | | 40 | % |
Merchant | 29 | % | | 30 | % | | 29 | % | | 30 | % |
Packaged Gas | 12 | % | | 13 | % | | 11 | % | | 13 | % |
Other | 13 | % | | 17 | % | | 14 | % | | 17 | % |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Asia segment sales increased $31 million, or 9%, in the second quarter as compared to the prior year. Strong volume growth increased sales by 10% due primarily to higher volumes in China, India, and Korea. New plant start-ups in China, India and Korea, primarily for metals, manufacturing and chemicals customers, contributed significantly to this volume growth. The strong volume growth was partially offset by a 1% reduction in pricing, primarily liquid argon in China. For the year-to-date period, sales increased $64 million, or 9%, for the same reasons discussed above.
Asia segment operating profit decreased $7 million, or 10% for the second quarter 2013 as compared to the prior year. Strong volumes resulted in a 15% increase which was partially offset by a 5% decrease due to lower pricing. Operating expenses are $15 million higher than the prior year quarter primarily attributable to a gain on a land sale in Korea included in the prior year. Operating profit decreased $1 million, or 1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the prior year. Higher volumes resulted in a 14% increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and was more the offset by a 4% decrease in pricing coupled with the impact of the prior year gain on land sale in Korea.
Surface Technologies
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Variance |
Sales | $ | 165 |
| | $ | 168 |
| | (2 | )% | | $ | 328 |
| | $ | 337 |
| | (3 | )% |
Cost of sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | 105 |
| | 110 |
| | | | 212 |
| | 220 |
| | |
Gross margin | 60 |
| | 58 |
| | | | 116 |
| | 117 |
| | |
Operating expenses | 18 |
| | 20 |
| | | | 38 |
| | 42 |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | 11 |
| | 11 |
| | | | 21 |
| | 22 |
| | |
Operating profit | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | 15 | % | | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 53 |
| | 8 | % |
Margin % | 18.8 | % | | 16.1 | % | | | | 17.4 | % | | 15.7 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 vs. 2012 |
| % Change | | % Change | | % Change | | % Change |
| Sales | | Operating Profit | | Sales | | Operating Profit |
Factors Contributing to Changes | | | | | | | |
Volume/Price | — | % | | 6 | % | | (1 | )% | | (2 | )% |
Cost pass-through | (1 | )% | | — | % | | (1 | )% | | — | % |
Currency | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% |
Acquisitions/divestitures | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Other | — | % | | 10 | % | | — | % | | 11 | % |
| (2 | )% | | 15 | % | | (3 | )% | | 8 | % |
The following table provides sales by end-market:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| % of Sales | | % Change | | % of Sales | | % Change |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales | | 2013 | | 2012 | | Organic Sales |
Sales by End Markets | | | | | | | | | | | |
Manufacturing | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | — | % | | 13 | % | | 14 | % | | (5 | )% |
Metals | 8 | % | | 7 | % | | 7 | % | | 8 | % | | 7 | % | | 2 | % |
Energy | 29 | % | | 28 | % | | 3 | % | | 29 | % | | 28 | % | | 1 | % |
Chemicals | 2 | % | | 3 | % | | (20 | )% | | 2 | % | | 3 | % | | (12 | )% |
Electronics | 1 | % | | 1 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Healthcare | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Food & Beverage | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | (16 | )% | | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | (11 | )% |
Aerospace | 34 | % | | 34 | % | | 1 | % | | 34 | % | | 34 | % | | (1 | )% |
Other | 10 | % | | 11 | % | | (9 | )% | | 11 | % | | 11 | % | | (6 | )% |
| 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | |
Surface Technologies segment sales decreased $3 million, or 2%, in the second quarter of 2013 versus the respective 2012 period. Higher pricing in the quarter offset the impact of lower volumes of industrial coatings. Cost pass-through reduced sales by 1% for the quarter and relates to precious metal costs, used to make powders used in thermal spray coatings, with no impact on operating profit. Currency translation negatively impacted sales by 1% for the quarter, due primarily to the weakening of the Japanese Yen versus the U.S. Dollar. For the six-month period, sales decreased 3% due to lower volumes of industrial coatings partially offset by coatings for the oil and gas industry. Higher pricing in the six month period offset the impact of lower volumes.
Surface Technologies segment operating profit increased $4 million, or 15%, in the second quarter and $4 million, or 8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 versus the respective 2012 periods. The impact of higher pricing and lower costs offset the impact of lower overall volumes for both the quarter and year-to-date periods.
Currency
The results of Praxair’s non-U.S. operations are translated to the company’s reporting currency, the U.S. dollar, from the functional currencies used in the countries in which the company operates. For most foreign operations, Praxair uses the local currency as its functional currency. There is inherent variability and unpredictability in the relationship of these functional currencies to the U.S. dollar and such currency movements may materially impact Praxair’s results of operations in any given period.
To help understand the reported results, the following is a summary of the significant currencies underlying Praxair’s consolidated results and the exchange rates used to translate the financial statements (rates of exchange expressed in units of local currency per U.S. dollar):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Percentage of YTD 2013 Consolidated Sales (a) | | Exchange Rate for Income Statement | | Exchange Rate for Balance Sheet |
| Year-To-Date Average | | June 30, | | December 31, |
Currency | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Brazil real | 15 | % | | 2.03 |
| | 1.86 |
| | 2.22 |
| | 2.04 |
|
Euro | 13 | % | | 0.76 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 0.77 |
| | 0.76 |
|
Canada dollar | 8 | % | | 1.02 |
| | 1.00 |
| | 1.05 |
| | 0.99 |
|
Mexico peso | 7 | % | | 12.56 |
| | 13.26 |
| | 12.93 |
| | 13.05 |
|
China yuan | 5 | % | | 6.21 |
| | 6.30 |
| | 6.14 |
| | 6.29 |
|
Korea won | 3 | % | | 1,104 |
| | 1,144 |
| | 1,142 |
| | 1,073 |
|
India rupee | 3 | % | | 55.01 |
| | 51.83 |
| | 59.39 |
| | 54.85 |
|
Singapore dollar | 1 | % | | 1.24 |
| | 1.27 |
| | 1.27 |
| | 1.22 |
|
Argentina peso | 1 | % | | 5.13 |
| | 4.40 |
| | 5.39 |
| | 4.91 |
|
Colombia peso | <1% |
| | 1,827 |
| | 1,792 |
| | 1,929 |
| | 1,768 |
|
Taiwan dollar | <1% |
| | 29.66 |
| | 29.70 |
| | 29.98 |
| | 29.04 |
|
Thailand bhat | <1% |
| | 29.84 |
| | 31.04 |
| | 31.06 |
| | 30.64 |
|
Venezuela bolivar (b) | <1% |
| | 5.68 |
| | 4.30 |
| | 6.30 |
| | 4.30 |
|
| |
(a) | Certain Surface Technologies segment sales are included in European, Indian and Brazilian sales. |
| |
(b) | On February 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar from an exchange rate of 4.30 to 6.30 effective February 13, 2013. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a more detailed description of this item. |
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Financial Data
The following selected cash flow information provides a basis for the discussion that follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
(Millions of dollars) | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR): | | | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. plus depreciation and amortization | $ | 1,377 |
| | $ | 1,347 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 31 |
| | 28 |
|
Net income plus depreciation and amortization (including noncontrolling interests) | 1,408 |
| | 1,375 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Venezuela currency devaluation (a) | 23 |
| | — |
|
Deferred income taxes | 99 |
| | 83 |
|
Working capital: | | | |
Accounts receivable | (164 | ) | | (47 | ) |
Inventory | (27 | ) | | (14 | ) |
Prepaid and other current assets | (164 | ) | | 3 |
|
Payables and accruals | (6 | ) | | (118 | ) |
Pension contributions | (43 | ) | | (109 | ) |
Long-term assets, liabilities and other | (77 | ) | | (46 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 1,049 |
| | $ | 1,127 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Capital expenditures | (988 | ) | | (1,047 | ) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (1,269 | ) | | (51 | ) |
Divestitures and asset sales | 38 |
| | 71 |
|
Net cash used for investing activities | $ | (2,219 | ) | | $ | (1,027 | ) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Debt increases (reductions) - net | 1,755 |
| | 452 |
|
Issuances (purchases) of common stock - net | (269 | ) | | (206 | ) |
Cash dividends - Praxair, Inc. shareholders | (355 | ) | | (328 | ) |
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation | 24 |
| | 44 |
|
Noncontrolling interest transactions and other | (17 | ) | | (41 | ) |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | $ | 1,138 |
| | $ | (79 | ) |
| |
(a) | See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Cash Flow from Operations
Cash provided by operations of $1,049 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $78 million versus 2012. The decrease was primarily due to higher accounts receivable needed to support the increased level of sales and the timing of estimated income tax payments, partially offset by higher earnings and lower pension contributions compared to the prior-year period.
Praxair estimates that total 2013 contributions to its pension plans will be in the area of $50 million, of which $43 million have been made through June 30, 2013. In addition, Praxair expects to make $22 million of cash payments in the next twelve months related to the 2012 cost reduction program (see Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements).
Investing
Net cash used for investing of $2,219 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $1,192 million versus 2012 primarily due to acquisitions of NuCO2 , Dominion Technology Gases, an industrial gas company in Russia and several industrial gas distributors in North America (see Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements).
Financing
Cash provided by financing activities was $1,138 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013. Net debt increased $1,755 million primarily to fund acquisitions and capital expenditures. Cash dividends increased $27 million from the year ago period to $1.20 per share ($1.10 per share for 2012).
At June 30, 2013, Praxair’s total debt outstanding was $9,106 million, an increase of $1,744 million from December 31, 2012. In February 2013, Praxair issued $400 million of 0.75% notes due 2016 and $500 million of 2.70% notes due 2023. In March 2013, Praxair issued $500 million of 1.20% notes due 2018. In April 2013, Praxair issued $475 million of 1.25% notes due 2018 and $175 million of 3.55% notes due 2042. In June 2013, Praxair repaid $350 million of 3.95% notes and $500 million of 2.125% notes that became due.
Legal Proceedings
See Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of current legal proceedings.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The following non-GAAP measures are intended to supplement investors’ understanding of the company’s financial information by providing measures which investors, financial analysts and management use to help evaluate the company’s financial leverage, return on net assets employed and operating performance. Special items which the company does not believe to be indicative of on-going business trends are excluded from these calculations so that investors can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business trends on a consistent basis. Definitions of these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similar definitions used by other companies and are not a substitute for similar GAAP measures.
The following are the non-GAAP measures presented in the MD&A:
|
| | | | | | |
| June 30, | |
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | | 2012 | |
Debt-to-capital | 57.9 | % | | 51.9 | % | 1 |
After-tax return on capital | 13.0 | % | | 14.5 | % | |
Return on equity | 28.4 | % | | 29.0 | % | |
Debt-to-EBITDA | 2.1 |
| | 1.8 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2013 | | 2012 |
Adjusted amounts: 2 | | | | |
Operating profit | | $ | 1,288 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
|
As a percent of sales | | 21.8 | % | | 22.4 | % |
Effective tax rate | | 28.0 | % | | 28 | % |
Net income - Praxair, Inc. | | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 848 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 2.87 |
| | $ | 2.80 |
|
| |
1 | As of December 31, 2012. |
| |
2 | The six-month period ended June 30, 2013 excludes the $23 million impact of the Venezuela currency devaluation in the the first quarter of 2013. |
Debt-to-Capital Ratio
The debt-to-capital ratio is a measure used by investors, financial analysts and management to provide a measure of financial leverage and insights into how the company is financing its operations.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
(Dollar amounts in millions) | | | |
Debt | $ | 9,106 |
| | $ | 7,362 |
|
Less: cash and cash equivalents | (102 | ) | | (157 | ) |
Net debt | 9,004 |
| | 7,205 |
|
Equity and redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests | 259 |
| | 252 |
|
Praxair, Inc. shareholders’ equity | 5,928 |
| | 6,064 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 357 |
| | 357 |
|
Total equity and redeemable noncontrolling interests | 6,544 |
| — |
| 6,673 |
|
Capital | $ | 15,548 |
| | $ | 13,878 |
|
DEBT-TO-CAPITAL RATIO | 57.9 | % | | 51.9 | % |
After-tax Return on Capital (ROC)
After-tax return on capital is a measure used by investors, financial analysts and management to evaluate the return on net assets employed in the business. ROC measures the after-tax operating profit that the company was able to generate with the investments made by all parties in the business (debt, noncontrolling interests and Praxair, Inc. shareholders’ equity).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | | Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
(Dollar amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted operating profit (see below) | $ | 2,527 |
| | $ | 1,288 |
| | $ | 1,239 |
| | $ | 2,514 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | $ | 1,251 |
|
Less: adjusted income taxes (see below) | (664 | ) | | (338 | ) | | (326 | ) | | (662 | ) | | (334 | ) | | (328 | ) |
Less: tax benefit on interest expense* | (42 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (20 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (19 | ) | | (21 | ) |
Add: equity income | 38 |
| | 21 |
| | 17 |
| | 37 |
| | 17 |
| | 20 |
|
Net operating profit after-tax (NOPAT) | $ | 1,859 |
|
| $ | 949 |
|
| $ | 910 |
|
| $ | 1,849 |
|
| $ | 927 |
|
| $ | 922 |
|
Capital: | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30th, 2013 & 2012 respectively | $ | 15,548 |
| | | | | | $ | 13,017 |
| | | | |
March 31st, 2013 & 2012 respectively | $ | 15,344 |
| | | | | | $ | 13,248 |
| | | | |
December 31st, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 13,878 |
| | | | | | $ | 12,489 |
| | | | |
September 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 13,617 |
| | | | | | $ | 12,306 |
| | | | |
June 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 13,017 |
| | | | | | $ | 12,809 |
| | | | |
Five-quarter average | $ | 14,281 |
| | | | | | $ | 12,774 |
| | | | |
After-tax ROC | 13.0 | % | | | | | | 14.5 | % | | | | |
| |
* | Tax benefit on interest expense is computed using the effective rate. The effective tax rate used was 28% for 2013 and 2012. |
Return on Praxair, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity (ROE)
Return on Praxair, Inc. shareholders’ equity is a measure used by investors, financial analysts and management to evaluate operating performance from a Praxair shareholder perspective. ROE measures the net income attributable to Praxair, Inc. that the company was able to generate with the money shareholders have invested.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | | Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
(Dollar amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Net income - Praxair, Inc. (see below) | $ | 1,692 |
| | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 833 |
| | $ | 1,691 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | $ | 843 |
|
Praxair, Inc. shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30th, 2013 & 2012 respectively | $ | 5,928 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,615 |
| | | | |
March 31st, 2013 & 2012 respectively | $ | 6,169 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,940 |
| | | | |
December 31st, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 6,064 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,488 |
| | | | |
September 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 6,015 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,753 |
| | | | |
June 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 5,615 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,400 |
| | | | |
Five-quarter average | $ | 5,958 |
| | | | | | $ | 5,839 |
| | | | |
ROE | 28.4 | % | | | | | | 29.0 | % | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA and Debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA Ratio
These measures are used by investors, financial analysts and management to assess a company’s ability to meet its financial obligations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
| Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended | | Four Quarter Trailing | | Six Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | | | June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
(Dollar amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted net income - Praxair, Inc. (see below) | $ | 1,692 |
| | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 833 |
| | $ | 1,691 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | $ | 843 |
|
Add: adjusted noncontrolling interest (see below) | 57 |
| | 31 |
| | 26 |
| | 54 |
| | 28 |
| | 26 |
|
Add: interest expense - net | 152 |
| | 81 |
| | 71 |
| | 144 |
| | 70 |
| | 74 |
|
Add: adjusted income taxes (see below) | 664 |
| | 338 |
| | 326 |
| | 662 |
| | 334 |
| | 328 |
|
Add: depreciation and amortization | 1,043 |
| | 541 |
| | 502 |
| | 1,004 |
| | 499 |
| | 505 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 3,608 |
| | $ | 1,850 |
| | $ | 1,758 |
| | $ | 3,555 |
| | $ | 1,779 |
| | $ | 1,776 |
|
Net Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | |
June 30th | $ | 9,004 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,891 |
| | | | |
March 31st | $ | 8,563 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,749 |
| | | | |
December 31st, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 7,205 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,472 |
| | | | |
September 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 7,028 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,185 |
| | | | |
June 30th, 2012 & 2011 respectively | $ | 6,891 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,039 |
| | | | |
Five-quarter average | $ | 7,738 |
| | | | | | $ | 6,467 |
| | | | |
DEBT-TO-ADJUSTED EBITDA RATIO | 2.1 |
| | | | | | 1.8 |
| | | | |
Adjusted Amounts
Adjusted amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2013 exclude the impact of the loss on Venezuela currency devaluation. The company does not believe these items are indicative of on-going business trends and, accordingly, the impact is excluded from the reported amounts so that investors can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business trends on a consistent basis. Certain 2012 amounts are included for reference purposes. Adjusted amounts for the third quarter 2012 and fourth quarter 2011 have been included for reference purposes and to facilitate the calculations contained herein.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Adjusted Operating Profit and Margin | | | | | | | |
Reported operating profit | $ | 1,265 |
| | $ | 1,174 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | $ | 1,250 |
|
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Pension settlement charge | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Cost reduction program | — |
| | 56 |
| | — |
| | 40 |
|
Less: Gain on acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) |
Total adjustments | 23 |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Adjusted operating profit | $ | 1,288 |
| | $ | 1,239 |
| | $ | 1,263 |
| | $ | 1,251 |
|
Reported percent change | — | % | | | | | | |
Adjusted percent change | 2 | % | | | | | | |
Adjusted Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rate | | | | | | | |
Reported income taxes | $ | 338 |
| | $ | 252 |
| | $ | 334 |
| | $ | 322 |
|
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Pension settlement charge | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Income tax benefit | — |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Cost reduction program | — |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
Less: Gain on acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Total adjustments | — |
| | 74 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Adjusted income taxes | $ | 338 |
| | $ | 326 |
| | $ | 334 |
| | $ | 328 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Adjusted Effective Tax Rate | | | | | | | |
Reported income before income taxes and equity investments | $ | 1,184 |
| | $ | 1,103 |
| | $ | 1,193 |
| | $ | 1,176 |
|
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Pension settlement charge | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Cost reduction program | — |
| | 56 |
| | — |
| | 40 |
|
Less: Gain on acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) |
Total adjustments | 23 |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Adjusted income before income taxes and equity investments | $ | 1,207 |
| | $ | 1,168 |
| | $ | 1,193 |
| | $ | 1,177 |
|
Adjusted effective tax rate | 28.0 | % | | 27.9 | % | | 28.0 | % | | 27.9 | % |
Adjusted Noncontrolling Interests | | | | | | | |
Reported noncontrolling interests | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 25 |
|
Add: Cost reduction program | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Gain on acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Total adjustments | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Adjusted Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 26 |
|
Adjusted Net Income - Praxair, Inc. | | | | | | | |
Reported net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 836 |
| | $ | 844 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | $ | 849 |
|
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Pension settlement charge | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Less: Income tax benefit | — |
| | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Add: Cost reduction program | — |
| | 38 |
| | — |
| | 31 |
|
Less: Gain on acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (37 | ) |
Total adjustments | 23 |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) |
Adjusted net income - Praxair, Inc. | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 833 |
| | $ | 848 |
| | $ | 843 |
|
Reported percent change | (1 | )% | | | | | | |
Adjusted percent change | 1 | % | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data) | 2013 | | | | 2012 | | |
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share | | | | | | | |
Reported diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.79 |
| | | | $ | 2.80 |
| | |
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | 0.08 |
| | | | — |
| | |
Adjusted diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.87 |
| | | | $ | 2.80 |
| | |
Reported percent change | — | % | | | | | | |
Adjusted percent change | 3 | % | | | | | | |
Adjusted Full Year 2013 Diluted EPS Guidance
|
| | | | | | | |
| Full Year 2013 |
| Low End | | High End |
Diluted EPS guidance | $ | 5.82 |
| | $ | 5.92 |
|
Non-GAAP adjustments: | | | |
Add: Venezuela currency devaluation | 0.08 |
| | 0.08 |
|
Adjusted diluted EPS | $ | 5.90 |
| | $ | 6.00 |
|
Contractual Obligations Update
Refer to Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 1 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Outlook
Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2013 are expected to be in the range of $1.48 to $1.53 and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the full year 2013 are expected to be in the range of $5.90 to $6.00. This guidance excludes the impact of pension settlement charges expected to be recorded in the third quarter (see Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) and assumes an effective tax rate of about 28%. Also, the full year adjusted diluted earnings per share guidance excludes the impact of the Venezuela currency devaluation charge in the first quarter.
For the full year of 2013, Praxair expects sales in the area of $12.0 billion. As of June 30, 2013, full-year capital expenditures are expected to be in the range of $1.8 to $2.0 billion.
At June 30, 2013, Praxair’s backlog of large plants under construction was $2.3 billion. This represents the total estimated capital cost of large plants under construction. The company’s core business is to build, own, and operate industrial gas plants in order to supply atmospheric and process gases to customers. As such, Praxair believes that its backlog is an indicator of future sales growth.
Praxair provides quarterly updates on operating results, material trends that may affect financial performance, and financial earnings guidance via quarterly earnings releases and investor teleconferences. These updates are available on the company’s website, www.praxair.com, but are not incorporated herein.
Forward-looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s reasonable expectations and assumptions as of the date the statements are made but involve risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: the performance of stock markets generally; developments in worldwide and national economies and other international events and circumstances; changes in foreign currencies and in interest rates; the cost and availability of electric power, natural gas and other raw materials; the ability to achieve price increases to offset cost increases; catastrophic events including natural disasters, epidemics and acts of war and terrorism; the ability to attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel; the impact of changes in financial accounting standards; the impact of changes in pension plan liabilities; the impact of tax, environmental, healthcare and other legislation and government regulation in jurisdictions in which the company operates; the cost and outcomes of investigations, litigation and regulatory proceedings; continued timely development and market acceptance of new products and applications; the impact of competitive products and pricing; future financial and operating performance of major customers and industries served; the impact of information technology system failures, network disruptions and breaches in data security; and the effectiveness and speed of integrating new acquisitions into the business. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual future results or circumstances to differ materially from the projections or estimates contained in the forward-looking statements. The company assumes no obligation to update or provide revisions to any forward-looking statement in response to changing circumstances. The above listed risks and uncertainties are further described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) in this report which should be reviewed carefully. Please consider the company’s forward-looking statements in light of those risks.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to Item 7A. to Part II of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K for discussion.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
| |
(a) | Based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of Praxair’s disclosure controls and procedures, which was made under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Praxair’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have each concluded that, as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report, such disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by Praxair in reports that it files under the Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to management including Praxair’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
| |
(b) | There were no changes in Praxair’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Praxair’s internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Praxair, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of current legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Due to the size and geographic reach of the company’s operations, a wide range of factors, many of which are outside of the company’s control, could materially affect the company’s future operations and financial performance. Management believes the following risks may significantly impact the company:
General Economic Conditions - Weakening economic conditions in markets in which the company does business may adversely impact the company’s financial results and/or cash flows.
Praxair serves approximately 25 diverse industries across more than 50 countries, which generally leads to financial stability through various business cycles. However, a broad decline in general economic or business conditions in the industries served by its customers could adversely affect the demand for Praxair’s products and impair the ability of our customers to satisfy their obligations to the company, resulting in uncollected receivables and/or unanticipated contract terminations or project delays. In addition, many of the company’s customers are in businesses that are cyclical in nature, such as the chemicals, electronics, metals and refining industries. Downturns in these industries may adversely impact the company during these cycles. Additionally, such conditions could impact the utilization of the company’s manufacturing capacity which may require the company to recognize impairment losses on tangible assets such as property, plant and equipment as well as intangible assets such as intellectual property or goodwill.
Cost and Availability of Raw Materials and Energy - Increases in the cost of energy and raw materials and/or disruption in the supply of these materials could result in lost sales or reduced profitability.
Energy is the single largest cost item in the production and distribution of industrial gases. Most of Praxair’s energy requirements are in the form of electricity, natural gas and diesel fuel for distribution. Praxair attempts to minimize the financial impact of variability in these costs through the management of customer contracts. Large customer contracts typically have escalation and pass-through clauses to recover energy and feedstock costs. Such attempts may not successfully mitigate cost variability which could negatively impact its financial condition or results of operations. The supply of energy has not been a significant issue in the geographic areas where it conducts business. However, regional energy conditions are unpredictable and may pose future risk.
For carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, helium, hydrogen, specialty gases and surface technologies, raw materials are largely purchased from outside sources. Praxair has contracts or commitments for, or readily available sources of, most of these raw materials; however, their long-term availability and prices are subject to market conditions. A disruption in supply of such raw materials could impact the company’s ability to meet contractual supply commitments.
International Events and Circumstances - The company’s international operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad and international events and circumstances may adversely impact its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Praxair has substantial international operations which are subject to risks including devaluations in currency exchange rates, transportation delays and interruptions, political and economic instability and disruptions, restrictions on the transfer of funds, the imposition of duties and tariffs, import and export controls, changes in governmental policies, labor unrest, possible nationalization and/or expropriation of assets, domestic and international tax laws and compliance with governmental regulations. These events could have an adverse effect on the international operations in the future by reducing the demand for its products, decreasing the prices at which it can sell its products, reducing the U.S. dollar value of revenue from international operations or otherwise having an adverse effect on its business. In particular, due to government actions related to business and currency regulations, there is considerable risk associated with operations in Venezuela. At June 30, 2013, Praxair’s sales and net assets in Venezuela were less than 1% of Praxair’s consolidated amounts. Also, the Company is monitoring developments regarding the collectability of government receivables from healthcare sales to public hospitals in Spain and Italy where economic conditions remain challenging and uncertain. Historically, collection of such government receivables has extended well beyond the contractual terms of sale; however, payment has always been received. At June 30, 2013, government receivables in Spain and Italy totaled about $103 million.
Global Financial Markets Conditions - Macroeconomic factors may impact the company’s ability to obtain financing or increase the cost of obtaining financing which may adversely impact the company’s financial results and/or cash flows.
Volatility and disruption in the U.S. and global credit and equity markets, from time to time, could make it more difficult for Praxair to obtain financing for its operations and/or could increase the cost of obtaining financing. In addition, the company’s borrowing costs can be affected by short and long-term debt ratings assigned by independent rating agencies which are based, in significant part, on the company’s performance as measured by certain criteria such as interest coverage and leverage ratios. A decrease in these debt ratings could increase the cost of borrowing or make it more difficult to obtain financing. While the impact of volatility in the global credit markets cannot be predicted with certainty, the company believes that it has sufficient operating flexibility, cash reserves, and funding sources to maintain adequate amounts of liquidity to meet its business needs around the world.
Competitor Actions - The inability to effectively compete could adversely impact results of operations.
Praxair operates within a highly competitive environment worldwide. Competition is based on price, product quality, delivery, reliability, technology and service to customers. Competitors’ behavior related to these areas could potentially have significant impacts on the company’s financial results.
Governmental Regulations - The company is subject to a variety of United States and foreign government regulations. Changes in these regulations could have an adverse impact on the business, financial position and results of operations.
The company is subject to regulations in the following areas, among others:
| |
• | Environmental protection; |
| |
• | Domestic and international tax laws and currency controls; |
| |
• | Securities laws (e.g., SEC and generally accepted accounting principles in the United States); |
| |
• | Trade and import/ export restrictions; |
| |
• | Global anti-bribery laws; |
| |
• | Healthcare reimbursement regulations; and |
Changes in these or other regulatory areas may impact the company’s profitability, may require the company to spend additional resources to comply with the regulations, or may restrict the company’s ability to compete effectively in the marketplace. Noncompliance with such laws and regulations could result in penalties or sanctions that could have an adverse impact on the company’s financial results. Environmental protection and healthcare reimbursement legislation are discussed further below.
Praxair is subject to various environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air or water, the storage, handling and disposal of chemicals, hazardous substances and wastes, the remediation of contamination, the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, and other potential climate change initiatives. Violations of these laws could result in substantial penalties, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, or sanctions. The company may also be subject to liability for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at properties that it owns or operates and at other properties where Praxair or its predecessors have operated or arranged for the disposal of hazardous wastes.
Although management does not believe that any such liabilities will have a material adverse impact on its financial position and results of operations, management cannot provide assurance that such costs will not increase in the future or will not become material. See the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Environmental Matters” in Item 7 of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Catastrophic Events - Catastrophic events could disrupt the operations of the company and/or its customers and suppliers and may have a significant adverse impact on the results of operations.
The occurrence of catastrophic events or natural disasters such as hurricanes, health epidemics, acts of war or terrorism, could disrupt or delay the company’s ability to produce and distribute its products to customers and could potentially expose the company to third-party liability claims. In addition, such events could impact the company’s customers and suppliers resulting
in temporary or long-term outages and/or the limitation of supply of energy and other raw materials used in normal business operations. These situations are outside the company’s control and may have a significant adverse impact on the company’s financial results.
Retaining Qualified Personnel - The inability to attract and retain qualified personnel may adversely impact the company’s business.
If Praxair fails to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel, the company may not be able to develop, market or sell its products or successfully manage its business. Praxair is dependent upon its highly skilled, experienced and efficient workforce to be successful. Much of Praxair’s competitive advantage is based on the expertise and experience of its key personnel regarding its marketing, technology, manufacturing and distribution infrastructure, systems and products. The inability to attract and hire qualified individuals or the loss of key employees in very skilled areas could have a negative effect on the company’s financial results.
Technological Advances - If the company fails to keep pace with technological advances in the industry or if new technology initiatives do not become commercially accepted, customers may not continue to buy the company’s products and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Praxair’s research and development is directed toward developing new and improved methods for the production and distribution of industrial gases and the development of new markets and applications for the use of these gases. This results in the frequent introduction of new industrial gas applications and the development of new advanced air separation process technologies. The company also conducts research and development for its surface technologies to improve the quality and durability of coatings and the use of specialty powders for new applications and industries. As a result of these efforts, the company develops new and proprietary technologies and employs necessary measures to protect such technologies within the global geographies in which the company operates. These technologies help Praxair to create a competitive advantage and to provide a platform for the company to grow its business at greater percentages than the rate of industrial production growth in such geographies. If Praxair’s research and development activities do not keep pace with competitors or if it does not create new technologies that benefit customers, future results of operations could be adversely affected.
Litigation and Governmental Investigations - The outcomes of litigation and governmental investigations may affect the company’s financial results.
Praxair is subject to various lawsuits and governmental investigations arising out of the normal course of business that may result in adverse outcomes. These actions are based upon alleged environmental, tax, antitrust and personal injury claims, among others. Adverse outcomes in some or all of the claims pending may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief that could adversely affect its ability to conduct business. While management currently believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on the company’s financial position or liquidity, the litigation and other claims Praxair faces are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. There exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the company’s results of operations for the period in which the effect of an unfavorable final outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
Tax Liabilities - Potential tax liabilities could adversely impact the company’s financial position and results of operations.
Praxair is subject to income and other taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The determination of the company’s worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires judgment and is based on diverse legislative and regulatory structures that exist in the various jurisdictions where the company operates. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in its financial statements and may materially affect the company’s financial results for the period when such determination is made. See Notes 5 and 17 to the consolidated financial statements of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Pension Liabilities - Risks related to our pension benefit plans may adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows.
Pension benefits represent significant financial obligations that will be ultimately settled in the future with employees who meet eligibility requirements. Because of the uncertainties involved in estimating the timing and amount of future payments and asset returns, significant estimates are required to calculate pension expense and liabilities related to the company’s plans. The company utilizes the services of independent actuaries, whose models are used to facilitate these calculations. Several key assumptions are used in the actuarial models to calculate pension expense and liability amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. In particular, significant changes in actual investment returns on pension assets, discount rates, or legislative or regulatory changes could impact future results of operations and required pension contributions. For information regarding the potential impacts regarding significant assumptions used to estimate pension expense, including discount rates and the expected long-term rates of return on plan assets. See “Critical Accounting Policies - Pension Benefits” included in
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of Praxair’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Operational Risks - Operational risks may adversely impact the company’s business or results of operations.
Praxair’s operating results are dependent on the continued operation of its production facilities and its ability to meet customer contract requirements and other needs. Insufficient or excess capacity threatens the company’s ability to generate competitive profit margins and may expose the company to liabilities related to contract commitments. Operating results are also dependent on the company’s ability to complete new construction projects on time, on budget and in accordance with performance requirements. Failure to do so may expose the business to loss of revenue, potential litigation and loss of business reputation.
Also inherent in the management of the company’s production facilities and delivery systems, including storage, vehicle transportation and pipelines, are operational risks that require continuous training, oversight and control. Material operating failures at production, storage facilities or pipelines, including fire, toxic release and explosions, or the occurrence of vehicle transportation accidents could result in loss of life, damage to the environment, loss of production and/or extensive property damage, all of which may negatively impact the company’s financial results.
Information Technology Systems – The Company may be subject to information technology system failures, network disruptions and breaches in data security.
Praxair relies on IT systems and networks for business and operational activities, and also stores and processes sensitive business and proprietary information in these systems and networks. These systems are susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, viruses, break-ins and similar events, or breaches of security. Management has taken steps to address these risks and concerns by implementing advanced security technologies, internal controls, network and data center resiliency and recovery processes. Despite these steps, however, operational failures and breaches of security from increasingly sophisticated cyber threats could lead to the loss or disclosure of confidential information, result in regulatory actions and have a material adverse impact on Praxair's operations, reputation and financial results.
Acquisitions and Joint Ventures - The inability to effectively integrate acquisitions or collaborate joint venture partners could adversely impact the company’s financial position and results of operations.
Praxair has evaluated, and expects to continue to evaluate, a wide array of potential strategic acquisitions and joint ventures. Many of these acquisitions, if consummated, could be material to its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired company, business or group of assets may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Although historically the company has been successful with its acquisition strategy and execution, the areas where the company may face risks include:
| |
• | The need to implement or remediate controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a larger public company at companies that prior to the acquisition lacked these controls, procedures and policies; |
| |
• | Diversion of management time and focus from operating existing business to acquisition integration challenges; |
| |
• | Cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into the existing organization; |
| |
• | The need to integrate each company’s accounting, management information, human resource and other administrative systems to permit effective management; |
| |
• | Difficulty with the assimilation of acquired operations and products; |
| |
• | Failure to achieve targeted synergies; and |
| |
• | Inability to retain key employees and business relationships of acquired companies. |
Foreign acquisitions and joint ventures involve unique risks in addition to those mentioned above, including those related to integration of operations across different cultures and languages, currency risks and the particular economic, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries. Also, the anticipated benefit of the company’s acquisitions may not materialize. Future acquisitions or dispositions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or impairments of goodwill, any of which could adversely impact the company’s financial results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Equity Securities- Certain information regarding purchases made by or on behalf of the company or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of its common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 is provided below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (Thousands) | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Numbers of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program (1) (Thousands) | | Maximum Number (or approximate dollar value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (2) (Millions) |
April 2013 | 822 |
| | $ | 110.63 |
| | 822 |
| | $ | 742 |
|
May 2013 | 411 |
| | $ | 114.75 |
| | 411 |
| | $ | 695 |
|
June 2013 | 415 |
| | $ | 115.40 |
| | 415 |
| | $ | 647 |
|
Second Quarter 2013 | 1,648 |
| | $ | 112.89 |
| | 1,648 |
| | $ | 647 |
|
| |
(1) | On January 24, 2012, the company’s board of directors approved the repurchase of an additional $1.5 billion of its common stock (2012 program) which could take place from time to time on the open market (which could include the use of 10b5-1 trading plans) or through negotiated transactions, subject to market and business conditions. The 2012 program does not have any stated expiration date. |
| |
(2) | As of June 30, 2013, the Company purchased $853 million of its common stock pursuant to the 2012 program, leaving an additional $647 million remaining authorized under the 2012 program. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | | |
(a) | Exhibits | | |
| | | |
| 12.01 | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| | |
| 31.01 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification |
| | |
| 31.02 | | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification |
| | |
| 32.01 | | Section 1350 Certification (such certifications are furnished for the information of the Commission and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act). |
| | |
| 32.02 | | Section 1350 Certification (such certifications are furnished for the information of the Commission and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act). |
| | |
| 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
| 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| | |
| 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| | |
| 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
SIGNATURE
Praxair, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | PRAXAIR, INC. | |
| | |
| | (Registrant) | |
| | |
Date: July 24, 2013 | | By: /s/ Elizabeth T. Hirsch | |
| | |
| | Elizabeth T. Hirsch | |
| | Vice President and Controller | |
| | (On behalf of the Registrant | |
| | and as Chief Accounting Officer) | |