e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
July 27, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-27130
Network Appliance,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
77-0307520
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
495 East Java Drive,
Sunnyvale, California 94089
(Address of principal executive
offices, including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(408) 822-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock, $0.001 par value, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 24, 2007
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
355,820,070
|
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
TRADEMARKS
2008 Network Appliance, Inc. All rights reserved.
Specifications subject to change without notice. NetApp, the
Network Appliance logo, NearStore, and NetCache are registered
trademarks and Network Appliance, and FlexClone, is a trademark
of Network Appliance, Inc. in the United States and other
countries. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft
Corporation. Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle
Corporation. Symantec is a trademark of Symantec Corporation.
UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group. All other
brands or products are trademarks or registered trademarks of
their respective holders and should be treated as such.
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands - Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
April 27, 2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
623,990
|
|
|
$
|
489,079
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
706,270
|
|
|
|
819,702
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowances of $2,442 at July 27, 2007, and $2,572 at
April 27, 2007
|
|
|
403,159
|
|
|
|
548,249
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
58,019
|
|
|
|
54,880
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
86,696
|
|
|
|
99,840
|
|
Short-term restricted cash and
investments
|
|
|
103,906
|
|
|
|
118,312
|
|
Short-term deferred income taxes
|
|
|
106,810
|
|
|
|
110,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,088,850
|
|
|
|
2,240,803
|
|
Property and Equipment,
Net
|
|
|
629,124
|
|
|
|
603,523
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
601,056
|
|
|
|
601,056
|
|
Intangible Assets,
Net
|
|
|
76,115
|
|
|
|
83,009
|
|
Long-Term Restricted Cash and
Investments
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
|
3,639
|
|
Long-Term Deferred Income Taxes
and Other Assets
|
|
|
155,037
|
|
|
|
126,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,555,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,658,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
69,150
|
|
|
$
|
85,110
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
136,077
|
|
|
|
144,112
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
53,371
|
|
Accrued compensation and related
benefits
|
|
|
107,377
|
|
|
|
177,327
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
89,887
|
|
|
|
97,017
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
663,865
|
|
|
|
630,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,072,031
|
|
|
|
1,187,547
|
|
Long-Term Deferred
Revenue
|
|
|
485,970
|
|
|
|
472,423
|
|
Other Long-Term
Obligations
|
|
|
70,288
|
|
|
|
9,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,628,289
|
|
|
|
1,669,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (424,353 shares
at July 27, 2007, and 421,623 shares at April 27,
2007)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,479,063
|
|
|
|
2,380,623
|
|
Treasury stock at cost
(61,115 shares at July 27, 2007, and
54,593 shares at April 27, 2007)
|
|
|
(1,823,691
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623,691
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,260,502
|
|
|
|
1,226,165
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
5,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,927,135
|
|
|
|
1,989,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,555,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,658,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts - Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
463,333
|
|
|
$
|
465,611
|
|
Software entitlements and
maintenance
|
|
|
107,927
|
|
|
|
74,830
|
|
Service
|
|
|
117,975
|
|
|
|
80,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
689,235
|
|
|
|
621,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
|
186,751
|
|
|
|
187,965
|
|
Cost of software entitlements and
maintenance
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
Cost of service
|
|
|
83,203
|
|
|
|
57,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
272,038
|
|
|
|
248,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
417,197
|
|
|
|
373,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
244,643
|
|
|
|
195,518
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
106,556
|
|
|
|
88,678
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
41,450
|
|
|
|
32,396
|
|
Restructuring recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
392,649
|
|
|
|
316,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
Operations
|
|
|
24,548
|
|
|
|
56,552
|
|
Other Income (Expenses),
Net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
17,035
|
|
|
|
16,656
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
|
(3,871
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net
|
|
|
16,786
|
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income
Taxes
|
|
|
41,334
|
|
|
|
70,116
|
|
Provision for Income
Taxes
|
|
|
6,997
|
|
|
|
15,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
34,337
|
|
|
$
|
54,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Used in Net Income per
Share Calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
364,457
|
|
|
|
373,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
377,631
|
|
|
|
391,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
34,337
|
|
|
$
|
54,670
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
26,734
|
|
|
|
18,714
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
4,686
|
|
Amortization of patents
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
40,411
|
|
|
|
43,022
|
|
Loss on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(17,803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
(8,339
|
)
|
|
|
(4,489
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
188,072
|
|
|
|
69,914
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(3,145
|
)
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(27,392
|
)
|
|
|
(26,337
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(14,082
|
)
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
18,434
|
|
|
|
(6,914
|
)
|
Accrued compensation and related
benefits
|
|
|
(69,889
|
)
|
|
|
(38,964
|
)
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(20,480
|
)
|
|
|
(10,980
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
46,548
|
|
|
|
61,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
200,899
|
|
|
|
164,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(328,893
|
)
|
|
|
(874,416
|
)
|
Redemptions of investments
|
|
|
447,022
|
|
|
|
906,423
|
|
Redemptions of restricted
investments
|
|
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
16,322
|
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
Proceeds from sales of
nonmarketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(33,586
|
)
|
|
|
(23,056
|
)
|
Purchases of nonmarketable
securities
|
|
|
(4,035
|
)
|
|
|
(1,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
93,671
|
|
|
|
24,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
related to employee stock transactions
|
|
|
49,991
|
|
|
|
36,831
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
8,339
|
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(15,960
|
)
|
|
|
(27,866
|
)
|
Tax withholding payments reimbursed
by restricted stock
|
|
|
(2,742
|
)
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
|
(220,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(160,372
|
)
|
|
|
(207,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes
on Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
|
|
134,911
|
|
|
|
(18,927
|
)
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
489,079
|
|
|
|
461,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
623,990
|
|
|
$
|
442,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and
equipment on account
|
|
$
|
18,864
|
|
|
$
|
6,524
|
|
Income tax benefit from employee
stock transactions
|
|
|
20,702
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
6,376
|
|
|
$
|
22,453
|
|
Interest paid on debt
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except per-share data)
(Unaudited)
Based in Sunnyvale, California, Network Appliance was
incorporated in California in April 1992 and reincorporated in
Delaware in November 2001. Network Appliance, Inc. is a supplier
of enterprise storage and data management software and hardware
products and services. Our solutions help global enterprises
meet major information technology challenges such as managing
storage growth, assuring secure and timely information access,
protecting data, and controlling costs by providing innovative
solutions that simplify the complexity associated with managing
corporate data. Network
Appliancetm
solutions are the data management and storage foundation for
many of the worlds leading corporations and government
agencies.
|
|
2.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared by Network Appliance,
Inc. without audit and reflect all adjustments, consisting only
of normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim
periods presented. The statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (generally accepted accounting
principles) for interim financial information and in
accordance with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and
Article 10-01
of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual
consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we began to classify
sales-related tax receivable balances from our customers within
prepaid expenses and other current assets. These balances were
included in accounts receivable, net, in previous periods
($43,075 at April 27, 2007) and such amounts have been
reclassified in the accompanying financial statements to conform
to the current period classification. This reclassification had
no effect on the reported amounts of net income or cash flow
from operations for any period presented. In addition, we have
chosen to use the term software entitlements and
maintenance in our statements of income to describe the
arrangements under which we provide our customers the right to
receive unspecified software product upgrades and enhancements
on a
when-and-if-available
basis, bug fixes and patch releases; these were previously
described as software upgrade and maintenance
arrangements.
We operate on a 52-week or 53-week year ending on the last
Friday in April. The first quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006 were
both 13-week fiscal periods.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended April 27, 2007. The results of
operations for the quarter ended July 27, 2007, are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected
for the full fiscal year or future operating periods.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial
statements is in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles and requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Such estimates include, but are not limited
to, revenue recognition and allowances; allowance for doubtful
accounts; valuation of goodwill and intangibles; fair value of
derivative instruments and related hedged items; accounting for
income taxes; inventory reserves and write-down; restructuring
accruals; impairment losses on investments; fair value of
options granted under our stock-based compensation plans; and
loss contingencies. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
6
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Stock-Based
Compensation, Equity Incentive Programs and Stockholders
Equity
Effective April 29, 2006, we adopted the fair value
recognition provision of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payments (SFAS No. 123R)
under the modified prospective method.
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
The stock-based compensation expenses included in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income for the quarter ended
July 27, 2007, and July 28, 2006, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27,
|
|
|
July 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
670
|
|
Cost of service revenue
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
18,717
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
13,175
|
|
|
|
13,868
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,129
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense before income taxes
|
|
|
40,411
|
|
|
|
43,022
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
(7,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense after income taxes
|
|
$
|
33,129
|
|
|
$
|
35,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation
associated with each type of award:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27,
|
|
|
July 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Employee stock options and awards
|
|
$
|
36,529
|
|
|
$
|
40,123
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
(ESPP)
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
Amounts capitalized in inventory
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense before income taxes
|
|
|
40,411
|
|
|
|
43,022
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
(7,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
expense after income taxes
|
|
$
|
33,129
|
|
|
$
|
35,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Benefits Recorded in Stockholders Equity
For the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, the total income
tax benefit associated with employee stock transactions was
$20,702 and $29,987, respectively.
Income
Tax Effects on Statements of Cash Flows
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, we have presented
tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the
compensation cost recognized for those options as financing cash
flows. As such, the tax benefits related to tax deductions in
excess of the compensation cost recognized, of $8,339 and $4,489
has been presented as financing cash flows for the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively.
7
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Valuation
Assumptions
In compliance with SFAS No. 123R, we estimated the
fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes model on the
date of the grant. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes
valuation model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
ESPP
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
Expected life in years(1)
|
|
4.0
|
|
4.0
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.5
|
Risk-free interest rate(2)
|
|
4.33% - 5.02%
|
|
4.79% - 5.05%
|
|
4.95%
|
|
5.02%
|
Volatility(3)
|
|
33% - 38%
|
|
35% - 36%
|
|
35%
|
|
37%
|
Expected dividend(4)
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The expected life of 4.0 years represented the period that
our stock-option awards are expected to be outstanding and was
determined based on historical experience on similar awards. The
expected life of 0.5 years for the purchase plan was based
on the term of the purchase period of the purchase plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The risk-free interest rate for the options was based upon U.S.
Treasury bills with equivalent expected terms of our employee
stock-option award. The risk-free interest rate for the purchase
plan was based upon U.S. Treasury bills yield curve in effect at
the time of grant for the expected term of the purchase period. |
|
(3) |
|
We used the implied volatility of traded options to estimate our
stock price volatility. |
|
(4) |
|
The expected dividend was determined based on our history and
expected dividend payouts. |
As required by SFAS No. 123R, we estimate our
forfeiture rates based on historical voluntary termination
behavior and recognized compensation expense only for those
equity awards expected to vest.
Stock
Options
A summary of the combined activity under our stock option plans
and agreements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Numbers
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 27, 2007
|
|
|
22,862
|
|
|
|
65,043
|
|
|
$
|
29.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(3,702
|
)
|
|
|
3,702
|
|
|
|
31.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units granted
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
14.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeitures and
cancellation
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
(966
|
)
|
|
|
37.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units forfeitures
and cancellation
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 27, 2007
|
|
|
20,037
|
|
|
|
65,871
|
|
|
$
|
29.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to
vest as of July 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,943
|
|
|
$
|
30.22
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
$
|
338,731
|
|
Exercisable at July 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,523
|
|
|
$
|
29.01
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
|
$
|
306,707
|
|
RSUs vested and expected to vest
as of July 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
33,573
|
|
Exercisable at July 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The intrinsic value represents the difference between the
exercise price of stock options and the market price of our
stock on that day for all in-the-money options. The
weighted-average fair value for the first quarter fiscal 2008
8
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
grants as of the grant date was $10.76. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised was $32,619 and $26,382 for the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. We received
$26,395 and $19,320 from the exercise of stock options for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following table summarizes our nonvested shares (restricted
stock awards) as of July 27, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested at April 27, 2007
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
$
|
34.45
|
|
Awards granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards vested
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
27.86
|
|
Awards canceled/expired/forfeited
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
34.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 27, 2007
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
35.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although nonvested shares are legally issued, they are
considered contingently returnable shares subject to repurchase
by the Company when employees terminate their employment. The
total fair value of shares vested during the first quarters of
fiscal 2008 and 2007 was $585 and $1,516, respectively. There
was $45,755 of total unrecognized compensation as of
July 27, 2007 related to restricted stock awards. The
unrecognized compensation will be amortized on a straight-line
basis over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 27, 2007
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
$
|
26.13
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
26.13
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
3,226
|
|
The total intrinsic value of employee stock purchases was $5,044
and $10,942 for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The compensation cost for options purchased under
the ESPP plan was $3,876 and $3,383 for the first quarters of
fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. This compensation cost will
be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average
period of approximately 0.35 years.
The following table shows the shares issued and their purchase
price per share for the employee stock purchase plan for the
six-month period ended May 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Date
|
|
May 31, 2007
|
|
|
Shares issued
|
|
|
891
|
|
Average purchase price per share
|
|
$
|
26.50
|
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
Common stock repurchase activities for the quarter ended
July 27, 2007, and July 28, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
6,561
|
|
Cost of common stock repurchased
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
Average price per share
|
|
$
|
30.67
|
|
|
$
|
33.53
|
|
9
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Since the inception of the stock repurchase program through
July 27, 2007, we have purchased a total of
61,115 shares of our common stock at an average price of
$29.84 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,823,691.
At July 27, 2007, $199,948 remained available for
repurchases under the plan. The stock repurchase program may be
suspended or discontinued at any time.
On March 31, 2006, Network Appliance Global LTD.
(Global), a subsidiary of the Company, entered into
a loan agreement (the Loan Agreement), with the
lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent. The Loan Agreement provides for a term
loan available in two tranches, a tranche of $220,000
(Tranche A) and a tranche of $80,000
(Tranche B), for an aggregate borrowing of
$300,000. The proceeds of the term loan have been used to
finance a dividend from Global to the Company under the American
Jobs Creation Act. The Tranche A term loan, together with
accrued and unpaid interest, is due in full on the maturity date
of March 31, 2008. During the three-month period ended
July 27, 2007, we made repayments of $15,960 on the term
loan. The Tranche A term loan is secured by certain
investments totaling $101,467 as of July 27, 2007, held by
Global. The Tranche B term loan was fully repaid as of
January 26, 2007. Loan repayments of $69,150 are due in the
remainder of fiscal 2008.
Interest for the Tranche A term loan accrues at a floating
rate based on the base rate in effect from time to time, plus a
margin, which totaled 5.45% at July 27, 2007.
As of July 27, 2007, Global was in compliance with all debt
covenants as required by the Loan Agreement.
|
|
6.
|
Short-Term
Investments
|
The following is a summary of investments at July 27, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
$
|
548,182
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
1,682
|
|
|
$
|
546,718
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
114,669
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
114,698
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
39,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,682
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
181,109
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
180,733
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
10,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,831
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
33,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity securities
|
|
|
934,591
|
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
945,911
|
|
Less cash equivalents
|
|
|
138,139
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,174
|
|
Less short-term restricted
investments
|
|
|
102,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
101,467
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
694,432
|
|
|
$
|
13,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
706,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of investments at April 27, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
$
|
544,334
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
1,484
|
|
|
$
|
543,248
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
114,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,415
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
113,084
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
113,101
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
218,492
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
217,751
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
10,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
9,985
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,758
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
8,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,913
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
84,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity securities
|
|
|
1,093,789
|
|
|
|
8,710
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
1,100,132
|
|
Less cash equivalents
|
|
|
164,347
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,370
|
|
Less short-term restricted
investments
|
|
|
116,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
116,060
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
812,492
|
|
|
$
|
8,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
$
|
819,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of July 27, 2007, we have pledged $101,467 of short-term
restricted investments for the Tranche A term loan as
defined in the Loan Agreement (see Note 5). In addition, we
have short-term and long-term restricted cash of $2,439 and
$5,242, respectively, relating to our foreign rent, custom, and
service performance guarantees. These combined amounts are
presented as short-term and long-term restricted cash and
investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of July 27, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
As of April 27, 2007, we have pledged $116,060 of
short-term restricted investments for the Tranche A term
loan as defined in the Loan Agreement (see Note 5). In
addition, we have short-term and long-term restricted cash of
$2,252 and $3,639, respectively, relating to our foreign rent,
custom, and service performance guarantees. These combined
amounts are presented as short-term and long-term restricted
cash and investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of April 27, 2007. |
Marketable equity securities consisted of 360 shares of
common stock in Blue Coat Systems, Inc. (Blue Coat)
received in connection with the sale of assets of
NetCache®.
On August 13, 2007, we sold all of these shares of common
stock of Blue Coat and received net proceeds of approximately
$18,256. (See Note 16.)
We record net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities in stockholders equity. Realized gains or
losses are reflected in income which have not been material for
all years presented. The following table shows the gross
unrealized losses and fair values of our investments, aggregated
by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position,
at July 27, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
$
|
198,030
|
|
|
$
|
(768
|
)
|
|
$
|
195,543
|
|
|
$
|
(914
|
)
|
|
$
|
393,573
|
|
|
$
|
(1,682
|
)
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
4,973
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,973
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
66,983
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
76,803
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
143,786
|
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
U.S. treasury
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
280,026
|
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
$
|
272,346
|
|
|
$
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
$
|
552,372
|
|
|
$
|
(2,141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The unrealized losses on our investments in Corporate Bonds and
U.S. government agencies were caused by interest rate
increases. We believe that we will be able to collect all
principal and interest amounts due to us at maturity given the
high credit quality of these investments. Because the decline in
market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and
not credit quality, and because we have the ability and intent
to hold those investments until a recovery of fair value, which
may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be
other-than temporarily impaired at July 27, 2007.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out basis) or market. Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
April 27, 2007
|
|
|
Purchased components
|
|
$
|
18,096
|
|
|
$
|
19,429
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
38,643
|
|
|
|
35,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,019
|
|
|
$
|
54,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, goodwill attributable to each of
our reporting units is required to be tested for impairment by
comparing the fair value of each reporting unit with its
carrying value. Our reporting units are the same as our
operating units. Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment
(or more frequently if indicators of impairment arise). As of
July 27, 2007, and April 27, 2007, respectively, there
had been no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets.
Intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
April 27, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Period (Years)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
10,040
|
|
|
$
|
(7,925
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
10,040
|
|
|
$
|
(7,429
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,611
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
|
4 - 5
|
|
|
|
113,625
|
|
|
|
(55,156
|
)
|
|
|
58,469
|
|
|
|
113,625
|
|
|
|
(49,878
|
)
|
|
|
63,747
|
|
Trademarks/tradenames
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
(1,876
|
)
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
(1,651
|
)
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
Customer Contracts/relationships
|
|
|
1.5 - 6
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
(5,143
|
)
|
|
|
12,077
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
(4,398
|
)
|
|
|
12,822
|
|
Covenants Not to Compete
|
|
|
1.5 - 2
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
(9,460
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
(9,310
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
155,675
|
|
|
$
|
(79,560
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,115
|
|
|
$
|
155,675
|
|
|
$
|
(72,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
83,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for identified intangible assets is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
Existing technology
|
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Other identified intangibles
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,894
|
|
|
$
|
5,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Based on the identified intangible assets recorded at
July 27, 2007, the future amortization expense of
identified intangibles for the remainder of fiscal 2008 and the
next four fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending April,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
20,282
|
|
2009
|
|
|
24,665
|
|
2010
|
|
|
19,694
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,987
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
76,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, and restricted
cash and investments reported in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets approximate their fair value. Our short-term
investments and foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair
value based on quoted market prices. Other investments in
nonmarketable securities are included in other assets at
July 27, 2007, and April 27, 2007, with total carrying
value of $12,948 and $8,932, which approximate their fair
values. The fair value of our debt also approximates its
carrying value as of July 27, 2007, and April 27, 2007.
We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative
or trading purposes. We enter into forward foreign exchange and
currency option contracts to hedge trade and intercompany
receivables and payables as well as future sales and operating
expenses against future movement in foreign exchange rates.
Foreign currency forward contracts obligate us to buy or sell
foreign currencies at a specified future date. Option contracts
give us the right to buy or sell foreign currencies and are
exercised only when economically beneficial. As of July 27,
2007, we had $336,126 of outstanding foreign exchange contracts
(including $22,444 of option contracts) as indicated below that
all had remaining maturities of five months or less. As of
April 27, 2007, we had $367,479 of outstanding foreign
exchange contracts (including $21,703 of option contracts). For
the balance sheet hedges, these contracts are adjusted to fair
value at the end of each month and are included in earnings. The
premiums paid on the foreign currency option contracts are
recognized as a reduction to other income when the contract is
entered into. For cash flow hedges, the related gains or losses
are included in other comprehensive income. Gains and losses on
these foreign exchange contracts are offset by losses and gains
on the underlying assets and liabilities. At July 27, 2007,
and April 27, 2007 the estimated notional fair values of
forward foreign exchange contracts were $335,700 and $368,807,
respectively. The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is
based on prevailing financial market information. For the
quarter ended July 27, 2007, net gains generated by hedged
assets and liabilities totaled $681 and were offset by losses on
the related derivative instruments of $70.
During all periods presented, we had certain options
outstanding, which could potentially dilute basic earnings per
share in the future, but were excluded in the computation of
diluted earnings per share in such periods, as their effect
would have been antidilutive. These certain options were
antidilutive in the quarters ended July 27, 2007, and
July 28, 2006, as these options exercise prices were
above the average market prices in such periods. For quarters
ended July 27, 2007, and July 28, 2006, 30,402 and
25,857 shares of common stock options with a weighted
average exercise price of $42.57 and $42.72, respectively, were
excluded from the diluted net income per share computation.
13
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share
computations for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Net Income
(Numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
34,337
|
|
|
$
|
54,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (Denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
364,713
|
|
|
|
374,315
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic computation
|
|
|
364,457
|
|
|
|
373,869
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding subject to repurchase
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Common shares issuable upon
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
12,918
|
|
|
|
17,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted computation
|
|
|
377,631
|
|
|
|
391,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding excluding unvested restricted stock
for that period. Diluted net income per share is computed giving
effect to all dilutive potential shares that were outstanding
during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of
incremental common shares subject to repurchase, common shares
issuable upon exercise of stock options, and restricted stock
awards.
The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
34,337
|
|
|
$
|
54,670
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale investments, net of related tax effect
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
3,841
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
39,672
|
|
|
$
|
58,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
April 27, 2007
|
|
|
Accumulated translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
3,769
|
|
|
$
|
3,321
|
|
Accumulated unrealized gain on
available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss)
on derivatives
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
10,837
|
|
|
$
|
5,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Restructuring
Charges
|
In fiscal 2002, as a result of continuing unfavorable economic
conditions and a reduction in information technology (IT)
spending rates, we implemented two restructuring plans, which
included reductions in our workforce and consolidations of our
facilities. As of July 27, 2007, we have no outstanding
balance in our restructuring liability for the first
restructuring. The second restructuring related to the closure
of an engineering facility and consolidation of resources to the
Sunnyvale headquarters. In fiscal 2006, we implemented a third
restructuring plan related to the move of our global services
center operations from Sunnyvale to our new flagship support
center at our Research Triangle Park facility in North Carolina.
Of the reserve balance at July 27, 2007, $542 was included
in other accrued liabilities, and the remaining $1,389 was
classified as long-term obligations.
Our restructuring estimates are reviewed and revised
periodically and may result in a substantial charge or reduction
to restructuring expense should different conditions prevail
than were anticipated in previous management estimates. Such
estimates included various assumptions such as the time period
over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease
terms, and expected sublease rates. During the quarter ended
July 27, 2007, we did not record any reduction or charges
in the restructuring reserve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reserve balance at April 28,
2006
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Cash payments and other
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at April 27,
2007
|
|
$
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,084
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments and other
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at July 27,
2007
|
|
$
|
1,931
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The following summarizes our commitments and contingencies at
July 27, 2007, and the effect such obligations may have on
our future periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office operating lease payments(1)
|
|
$
|
18,226
|
|
|
$
|
23,948
|
|
|
$
|
24,391
|
|
|
$
|
17,970
|
|
|
$
|
12,568
|
|
|
$
|
29,680
|
|
|
$
|
126,783
|
|
Real estate lease payments(2)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
7,579
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
162,110
|
|
|
|
200,557
|
|
Equipment operating lease
payments(3)
|
|
|
8,746
|
|
|
|
10,065
|
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
Venture capital funding
commitments(4)
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Capital expenditures(5)
|
|
|
13,023
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
Communications and maintenance(6)
|
|
|
14,318
|
|
|
|
15,881
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash
Obligations
|
|
$
|
55,450
|
|
|
$
|
62,039
|
|
|
$
|
47,859
|
|
|
$
|
29,904
|
|
|
$
|
22,707
|
|
|
$
|
191,790
|
|
|
$
|
409,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Commercial
Commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit(7)
|
|
$
|
2,709
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We lease sales offices and research and development facilities
throughout the United States and internationally. These sales
offices are leased under operating leases which expire through
fiscal 2016. We are responsible for certain maintenance costs,
taxes, and insurance under these leases. Substantially all lease
agreements have fixed |
15
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
payment terms based on the passage of time. Some lease
agreements provide us with the option to renew or terminate the
lease. Our future operating lease obligations would change if we
were to exercise these options and if we were to enter into
additional operating lease agreements. Rent operating lease
payments in the table exclude lease payments which are accrued
as part of our fiscal 2002 restructurings and include only rent
lease commitments that are over one year. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the above contractual cash obligations pursuant to
three financing arrangements with BNP Paribas LLC
(BNP) are (a) lease commitments of $925 in
fiscal 2008; $7,579 in fiscal 2009, $9,981 in each of the fiscal
years 2010, 2011, and 2012, $9,057 in fiscal 2013; and $4,729 in
fiscal 2014 which are based on the LIBOR rate at July 27,
2007, for a term of five years, and (b) at the expiration
or termination of the lease, a supplemental payment obligation
equal to our minimum guarantee of $148,324 in the event that we
elect not to purchase or arrange for sale of the buildings. |
|
(3) |
|
Equipment operating leases include servers and IT equipment used
in our engineering labs and data centers. |
|
(4) |
|
Venture capital funding commitments include a quarterly
committed management fee based on a percentage of our committed
funding to be payable through June 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Capital expenditures include worldwide contractual commitments
to purchase equipment and to construct building and leasehold
improvements, which will be recorded as Property and Equipment. |
|
(6) |
|
We are required to pay based on a minimum volume under certain
communication contracts with major telecommunication companies
as well as maintenance contracts with multiple vendors. Such
obligations will expire in November 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
The amounts outstanding under these letters of credit relate to
workers compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate
credit card program, and a foreign rent guarantee. |
As of July 27, 2007, we had entered into two financing,
construction, and leasing arrangements with BNP for office space
to be located on land currently owned by us in Sunnyvale,
California. These arrangements require us to lease our land to
BNP for a period of 50 years to construct approximately
380,000 square feet of office space costing up to $113,500.
After completion of construction, we will pay minimum lease
payments, which vary based on the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus a spread (5.72% at July 27,
2007) on the cost of the facilities. We expect to begin
making lease payments on the completed buildings in January and
September 2008 for terms of five years. We have the option to
renew the leases for two consecutive five-year periods upon
approval by BNP. Upon expiration (or upon any earlier
termination) of the lease terms, we must elect one of the
following options: We may (i) purchase the buildings from
BNP for $48,500 and $65,000, respectively; (ii) if certain
conditions are met, arrange for the sale of the buildings by BNP
to a third party for an amount equal to at least $41,225 and
$55,250, respectively, and be liable for any deficiency between
the net proceeds received from the third party and such amounts;
or (iii) pay BNP supplemental payments of $41,225 and
$55,250, respectively, in which event we may recoup some or all
of such payment by arranging for a sale of either or both
buildings by BNP during the ensuing two-year period.
On July 17, 2007, we entered into additional financing,
construction, and leasing arrangements with BNP for facility
space to be located on land currently owned by us in Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina. These arrangements require us to
lease our land to BNP for a period of 99 years to construct
approximately 120,000 square feet of data center costing up
to $61,000. After completion of construction, we will pay
minimum lease payments, which vary based on LIBOR plus a spread
(5.72% at July 27, 2007) on the cost of the facility.
We expect to begin making lease payments on the completed
buildings in September 2008 for a term of five and half years.
We have the option to renew the lease for two consecutive
five-year periods upon approval by BNP. Upon expiration (or upon
any earlier termination) of the lease term, we must elect one of
the following options: We may (i) purchase the building
from BNP for $61,000; (ii) if certain conditions are met,
arrange for the sale of the building by BNP to a third party for
an amount equal to at least $51,850, and be liable for any
deficiency between the net proceeds received from the third
party and $51,850; or (iii) pay BNP a supplemental payment
of $51,850, in which event we
16
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
may recoup some or all of such payment by arranging for a sale
of the building by BNP during the ensuing two-year period.
All leases require us to maintain specified financial covenants
with which we were in compliance as of July 27, 2007. Such
specified financial covenants include a maximum ratio of Total
Debt to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA) and a Minimum Unencumbered
Cash and Short Term Investments.
As of July 27, 2007, the notional fair value of our foreign
exchange forward and foreign currency option contracts totaled
$335,700. We do not believe that these derivatives present
significant credit risks, because the counterparties to the
derivatives consist of major financial institutions, and we
manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any
one counterparty. We do not enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Other than the
risk associated with the financial condition of the
counterparties, our maximum exposure related to foreign currency
forward and option contracts is limited to the premiums paid on
purchased options only.
We have both recourse and nonrecourse lease financing
arrangements with third-party leasing companies through
preexisting relationships with the customers. We sell our
products directly to the leasing company, and the lease
arrangement is made between our customer and the leasing
company. Under the terms of recourse leases, which are generally
three years or less, we remain liable for the aggregate unpaid
remaining lease payments to the third-party leasing company in
the event that any customers default. For these recourse
arrangements, revenues on the sale of our product to the leasing
company are deferred and recognized into income as payments to
the leasing company come due. As of July 27, 2007, and
April 27, 2007, the maximum recourse exposure under such
leases totaled approximately $11,831 and $10,262, respectively.
Under the terms of the nonrecourse leases, we do not have any
continuing obligations or liabilities. To date, we have not
experienced significant losses under this lease financing
program.
From time to time, we have committed to purchase various key
components used in the manufacture of our products. We establish
accruals for estimated losses on purchased components for which
we believe it is probable that they will not be utilized in
future operations. To the extent that such forecasts are not
achieved, our commitments and associated accruals may change.
In addition, we are subject to various legal proceedings and
claims which may arise in the normal course of business. While
the outcome of these legal matters is currently not
determinable, we do not believe that any current litigation or
claims will have a material adverse effect on our business, cash
flow, operating results, or financial condition.
We are currently undergoing federal income tax audits in the
United States and several foreign tax jurisdictions. The rights
to some of our intellectual property (IP) are owned
by certain of our foreign subsidiaries, and payments are made
between foreign and U.S. tax jurisdictions relating to the
use of this IP. Recently, some other companies have had their
foreign IP arrangements challenged as part of an examination.
Our management does not believe, based upon information
currently known to us, that the final resolution of any of our
audits will have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated
financial position and the results of operations and cash flows.
However, if upon the conclusion of these audits the ultimate
determination of our taxes owed in any of these tax
jurisdictions is for an amount in excess of the tax provision we
have recorded or reserved for, our overall effective tax rate
may be adversely impacted in the period of adjustment.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is currently auditing
our records under the schedule contracts it had with us to
verify our compliance with various contract provisions. If the
audit determines that we did not comply with such provisions, we
may be required to pay the GSA a potential settlement. The exact
date for completion of the audit and the subsequent negotiation
process is unknown and may not be concluded for some time. Our
management does not believe, based upon information currently
known to us, that the final resolution of our audit will have a
material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial position
and the results of operations and cash flows.
17
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. This interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition of
tax benefits, classification on the balance sheet, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits upon the adoption
of FIN No. 48, on April 28, 2007, was $58,326.
There was no cumulative effect from the adoption of
FIN No. 48, however, certain amounts were reclassified
among our consolidated balance sheet accounts as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings cumulative effect
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additional deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,889
|
|
Reclass from current liability to
long term liability
|
|
|
53,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in liability
|
|
$
|
58,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire portion of the $58,326 balance of unrecognized tax
benefits at April 28, 2007, if recognized, would affect our
effective tax rate.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax provision. During
the fiscal years ended
2005-2007,
we recognized total accrued interest and penalties of
approximately $170 and have included this accrual in our
FIN No. 48 disclosure balances.
We are subject to taxation in the United States, various states
and several foreign jurisdictions. Our federal income tax
returns are currently being examined for the fiscal years
2003-2004.
We are effectively subject to federal tax examination
adjustments for tax years ending on or after fiscal year 2000,
in that we have net operating loss carryforwards from these
years that could be subject to adjustment, if and when utilized.
As we are in the early stages of the federal tax return and
foreign jurisdiction audit process, at this time we can not make
a determination as to whether or not recognition of any
unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next
12 months.
The tax years that remain subject to examination for our major
tax jurisdictions are shown below:
Tax
Years Subject to Examination for Major Tax Jurisdictions at
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
2003 2007
|
|
United States federal
income tax
|
2002 2007
|
|
United States state
and local income tax
|
2003 2007
|
|
Australia
|
2005 2007
|
|
France
|
2004 2007
|
|
Germany
|
2005 2007
|
|
India
|
2006 2007
|
|
Japan
|
2000 2007
|
|
The Netherlands
|
2004 2007
|
|
United Kingdom
|
The above table excludes the net operating loss carryover risk
identified above with respect to federal and state tax returns.
18
NETWORK
APPLIANCE, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
Effective April 28, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN No. 48).
FIN No. 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a
company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its
financial statements uncertain tax positions that we have taken
or expect to take on a tax return (including a decision whether
to file or not to file a return in a particular jurisdiction).
FIN No. 48 is applicable to all uncertain tax
positions for taxes accounted for under FASB Statement
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109), and substantially changes the
applicable accounting model. There was no cumulative effective
from the adoption of FIN No. 48. As a result of the
implementation of FIN No. 48, we recognize the tax
liability for uncertain income tax positions on the income tax
return based on the two-step process prescribed in the
interpretation. The first step is to determine whether it is
more likely than not that each income tax position would be
sustained upon audit. The second step is to estimate and measure
the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater than 50%
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the
tax authority. Estimating these amounts requires us to determine
the probability of various possible outcomes. We evaluate these
uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. See
Note 14, Income Taxes, for further discussion.
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. SFAS No. 159 allows measurement at
fair value of eligible financial assets and liabilities that are
not otherwise measured at fair value. If the fair value option
for an eligible item is elected, unrealized gains and losses for
that item shall be reported in current earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to
draw comparison between the different measurement attributes the
company elects for similar types of assets and liabilities. This
statement is effective the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We are
currently evaluating the effect, if any, that the adoption of
SFAS No. 159 will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 provides a framework
for measuring fair value, clarifies the definition of fair
value, and expands disclosures regarding fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. We
are required to adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009. We are currently evaluating the effect
that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our
consolidated results of operations and financial condition, but
do not expect it to have a material impact.
On August 13, 2007, we sold 360 shares of common stock
of Blue Coat in a private transaction pursuant to Rule 144
under the Securities Act of 1933. We received net proceeds of
approximately $18,256, after deducting the purchasers
discount. These shares were acquired on September 11, 2006,
in connection with the sale of our NetCache assets to Blue Coat.
On August 14, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new
stock repurchase program in which up to $1,000,000 worth of
additional common stock may be purchased in addition to $199,948
remaining from all prior authorizations. On August 20,
2007, we repurchased $225,000 in common stock pursuant to our
existing and new stock repurchase programs.
19
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and is subject to the
safe harbor provisions set forth in the Exchange Act.
Forward-looking statements usually contain the words
estimate, intend, plan,
predict, seek, may,
will, should, would,
anticipate, expect, believe,
or similar expressions and variations or negatives of these
words. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations,
projections, or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are
forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements,
including, but not limited to, (1) the continued softness
in enterprise storage spending; (2) our programs to develop
more new accounts; (3) our intention to continue to
penetrate the largest storage buyers; (4) our plan to
restrict discretionary expense; (5) our business
fundamentals, our confidence in the competitiveness of our
products, and our ability to grow our business over the long
term; (6) our plan to invest in the people, processes and
systems necessary to best optimize our revenue growth; our
belief that we are well positioned in the fastest growth
segments of the storage market; (7) higher disk content
associated with high-end and mid-range storage systems and its
impact on our gross margin in the future; (8) our service
margin may experience some variability; (9) our estimate of
the impact that adopting SFAS No. 123R will have on
our earnings per share; (10) our estimates of future
amortization of patents, trademarks, tradenames, customer
contracts, and relationships; (11) our expectation to
continue to selectively add sales capacity in an effort to
expand domestic and international markets; (12) our
expectation that our sales and marketing expenses will increase
commensurate with future revenue growth; (13) our future
performance will depend in large part on our ability to maintain
and enhance our current product line, develop new products that
achieve market acceptance, maintain technological
competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of customer
requirements; (14) our expectation to continuously support
current and future product development and enhancement efforts
and to incur corresponding charges; (15) our intention to
continuously broaden our existing product offerings and
introduce new products; (16) our belief regarding our
research and development and general and administrative expenses
will increase in absolute dollars for the remainder of fiscal
2008; (17) our estimates regarding future amortization of
covenants not to compete; (18) our expectation that
interest income may vary; (19) period-to-period changes in
foreign exchange gains or losses will continue to be impacted by
hedging costs associated with our forward and option activities
and forecast variance; (20) our expectation that cash
provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future
periods; (21) the possibility we may receive less cash from
stock option exercises if stock option exercise patterns change;
(22) our expectations regarding our contractual cash
obligations and other commercial commitments at July 27,
2007, for future periods; (23) our expectation regarding
the complete construction of our building under the BNP lease
and the estimates regarding future minimum lease payments under
the lease term; (24) our expectation that capital
expenditures will increase consistent with our business growth;
(25) our expectation that our existing facilities and those
currently being developed will be sufficient for our needs for
at least the next two years and that our contractual
commitments, and any required capital expenditures over the next
few years, will be funded through cash from operations and
existing cash and investments; (26) our expectation that we
will incur higher capital expenditures in the near future;
(27) our belief that our cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and cash generated from operations will
satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, stock
repurchases, contractual obligations, and other liquidity
requirements associated with our operations through at least the
next 12 months; (28) our belief that, based upon
information available to us, that any current litigation and
claims including our audits will not have a material adverse
impact on our operating results; and (29) our belief that
the results of our GSA and income tax audits will not have a
materially adverse effect on us are inherently uncertain as they
are based on managements current expectations and
assumptions concerning future events, and they are subject to
numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date hereof and are based
upon information available to us at this time. These statements
are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any
obligation to update information in any forward-looking
statement.
First
Quarter Fiscal 2008 Overview
Revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were
$689.2 million, reflecting an increase of 10.9% year over
year but a decreased of 14.0% sequentially over the previous
quarter. We believe the principal factor impacting our
20
revenue was the continued softness in enterprise storage
spending, most notably in our existing commercial enterprise
customer accounts in the United States and parts of Europe. The
slowdown was not across all geographies and verticals. We
reported increased revenue from the Federal business and regions
such as Northeast Europe and Asia Pacific.
While we are not immune to the macroeconomic environment that is
beyond our control, we believe that we are well positioned in
the fastest growth segments of the storage market to capitalize
on an IT spending recovery. We will continue to expand our
programs to develop more new accounts, deepen our penetration in
our current enterprise accounts, and broaden our vertical
coverage. We intend to accelerate our revenue growth by
penetrating the largest buyers of storage in the world, and will
continue to invest in go-to-market partnerships, specifically
through our channel programs and partnerships. At the same time,
we will continue to restrict discretionary expense and slow down
the rate of hiring in order to return to our targeted business
model. However, if any storage market trends and emerging
standards on which we are basing our assumptions do not
materialize as anticipated, and if there is reduced or no demand
for our products, our expected revenue growth rate could be
materially affected.
Despite the revenue decrease from the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007, we believe our business fundamentals remain intact, and we
are confident in the competitiveness of our products and in our
ability to grow our business over the long term. We do not
believe that this shortfall is the result of changes in the
competitive environment. However, continued revenue growth
depends on the introduction and market acceptance of our new
products and solutions and continued market demand for our
products. We will continue to invest in the people, processes,
and systems necessary to best optimize our revenue growth and
long-term profitability. However, we cannot assure you that such
investments will achieve our financial objectives.
First
Quarter Fiscal 2008 Financial Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were
$689.2 million, a 10.9% increase over the same period a
year ago, however, a decrease of 14.0% from the immediate
preceding quarter. Our year-over-year revenue growth was driven
by an increase in software entitlements and maintenance revenue,
and an increase in service revenue.
|
|
|
|
Our overall gross margin increased to 60.5% in the first quarter
of fiscal 2008 from 60.0% in the same period a year ago. The
increase in our gross margin was primarily attributable to
higher margin associated with the increased revenue from
software entitlements and maintenance and a higher add-on
software mix and improved service margin.
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we generated
$200.9 million of cash from operating activities as
compared to $164.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2007. As of July 27, 2007, our cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments increased to $1,330.3 million,
compared to $1,308.8 million as of April 27, 2007.
This increase was due primarily to cash generated from
operations, partially offset by $200.0 million used to
repurchase our common stock. Our deferred revenue increased
sequentially by 4.3% to $1,149.8 million as of
July 27, 2007, from $1,103.0 million reported as of
April 27, 2007, reflecting the timing of software
entitlements and maintenance and service revenue recognition.
Capital purchases of plant, property, and equipment for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007 were $33.6 million
and $23.1 million, respectively, reflecting continued
worldwide capital investment to meet our business growth.
|
Critical
Accounting Estimates and Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results
of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of such statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period and the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements. Our estimates are based on historical
experience and other assumptions that we consider to be
appropriate in the circumstances. However, actual future results
may vary from our estimates.
21
With the exception of the changes required by
FIN No. 48 on Accounting for Income Taxes, there have
been no significant changes during the first quarter of fiscal
2008 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting
policies and estimates in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
section of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended April 27, 2007.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
The determination of our tax provision is subject to judgments
and estimates due to the complexity of the tax law that we are
subject to in several tax jurisdictions. Earnings derived from
our international business are generally taxed at rates that are
lower than U.S. rates, resulting in a lower effective tax
rate than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35.0%. The ability
to maintain our current effective tax rate is contingent on
existing tax laws in both the United States and the
respective countries in which our international subsidiaries are
located. Future changes in domestic or international tax laws
could affect the continued realization of the tax benefits we
are currently receiving. In addition, a decrease in the
percentage of our total earnings from our international business
or a change in the mix of international business among
particular tax jurisdictions could increase our overall
effective tax rate.
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires that deferred
tax assets and liabilities be recognized for the effect of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. SFAS No. 109 also
requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have provided a
valuation allowance of $21.0 million as of July 27,
2007, compared to $21.0 million as of April 27, 2007,
on certain of our deferred tax assets.
We are currently undergoing federal income tax audits in the
United States and several foreign tax jurisdictions. The rights
to some of our intellectual property (IP) are owned
by certain of our foreign subsidiaries, and payments are made
between foreign and U.S. tax jurisdictions relating to the
use of this IP. Recently, some other companies have had their
foreign IP arrangements challenged as part of an examination.
Our management does not believe, based upon information
currently known to us that the final resolution of any of our
audits will have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated
financial position and the results of operations and cash flows.
However, if upon the conclusion of these audits the ultimate
determination of our taxes owed in any of these tax
jurisdictions is for an amount in excess of the tax provision we
have recorded or reserved for, our overall effective tax rate
may be adversely impacted in the period of adjustment.
On April 28, 2007, we adopted FIN No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN No. 48). FIN No. 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). This interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As a
result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, we
recognize the tax liability for uncertain income tax positions
on the income tax return based on the two-step process
prescribed in the interpretation. The first step is to determine
whether it is more likely than not that each income tax position
would be sustained upon audit. The second step is to estimate
and measure the tax benefit as the amount that has a greater
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement
with the tax authority. Estimating these amounts requires us to
determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We
evaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis.
This evaluation is based on the consideration of several
factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in
applicable tax law, settlement of issues under audit, and new
exposures. If we later determine that our exposure is lower or
that the liability is not sufficient to cover our revised
expectations, we adjust the liability and effect a related
change in our tax provision during the period in which we make
such determination.
22
New
Accounting Standards
See Note 15 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for a full description of new accounting
pronouncements, including the respective expected dates of
adoption and effects on results of operations and financial
condition.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements
of income data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2007
|
|
|
July 28, 2006
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
67.2
|
%
|
|
|
74.9
|
%
|
Software entitlements and
maintenance
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
Service
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
Cost of software entitlements and
maintenance
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Cost of service
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Restructuring charges (recoveries)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Operations
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Other Income (Expenses), Net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Income, Net
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
and Analysis of Results of Operations
Total Revenues Total revenues increased by
10.9% to $689.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2008, from $621.3 million for the same period in the prior
year.
Product Revenues Product revenues decreased
by 0.5% to $463.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2008, from $465.6 million for the same period in the prior
year.
23
Product revenues were impacted by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased revenues from our current product portfolio. Product
revenue decreased $2.3 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 as compared to the same period a year ago, with a
$35.0 million decrease due to price and configuration on
existing products, offset by $32.7 million increase due to
higher unit volume. Of the $32.7 million volume increase,
$111.0 million revenue increase was due to new products,
while offset by a $78.3 million decrease in overall revenue
associated with lower shipment volumes on existing products.
Price changes, volumes, and product model mix can have an effect
on changes in product revenues; the impact on these forces is
significantly affected by the configuration of systems shipped.
|
|
|
|
Lower-cost-per-petabyte storage is a significant component of
our storage systems cost. As performance has improved on our
devices, the related price we can charge per petabyte of storage
has decreased as well.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from our older products declined by $177.5 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to same quarter a
year ago, primarily due to sales declines from older generation
products. Revenue generated by FAS900 series systems and
NearStore®
R200 systems decreased by 94.6% and 99.2%, respectively. In
addition, revenue also declined by $24.1 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the same period in the
prior year due to products that we no longer ship, including our
NetCache products.
|
|
|
|
Revenues of the FAS3000 and FAS6000 enterprise storage systems
increased 15.3% and 198.1%, respectively, for the first quarter
of fiscal 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Increased sales through indirect channels in absolute dollars,
including sales through our resellers, distributors, and OEM
partners, represented 61.4% and 55.7% of total revenues for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Our petabytes shipped increased 52.4% year over year to 110.9
petabytes due to increased penetration in primary and secondary
storage, i.e., enterprise data centers, data protection,
disaster recovery, archival, and compliance requirements. This
increase in petabytes shipped was attributable to an increase in
petabytes from 500-gigabyte ATA drives. ATA drives accounted for
56.8% of our total petabytes shipped in the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 compared to 54.2% in the same quarter a year ago.
Fibre Channel petabytes were up 42.4% year over year, to 42.7%
of our total shipped.
|
Our systems are highly configurable to respond to customer
requirements in the open systems storage markets that we serve.
As a result, the wide variation in customized configuration can
significantly impact revenue, cost of revenues, and gross margin
performance. Price changes, volumes, and product model mix can
have an effect on changes in product revenues; the impact on
these forces is significantly affected by the configuration of
systems shipped.
Software Entitlements and Maintenance
Revenues Software entitlements and maintenance
revenues increased by 44.2% to $107.9 million for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, from $74.8 million for the same
period a year ago, due primarily to a larger installed base of
customers who have purchased or renewed software entitlements
and maintenance and the timing of software entitlements and
maintenance revenue recognition. Software entitlements and
maintenance revenues represented 15.7% and 12.0% of total
revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007,
respectively.
Service Revenues Service revenues, which
include hardware support, professional services, and educational
services, increased by 45.9% to $118.0 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2008, from $80.8 million in the
same period a year ago.
The increase in absolute dollars was due to the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Professional service revenue increased by 49.1% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the same period a year ago,
due to an increasing number of customers which typically have
extremely complex IT environments and require professional
services to integrate our solution into their environments.
|
|
|
|
Service maintenance revenue increased by 45.2% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to the same period a year ago
due to a growing installed base, resulting in new customer
support contracts and renewals in addition to the timing of
service revenue recognition.
|
24
While it is an element of our strategy to expand and offer more
comprehensive global enterprise support and service solutions,
we cannot assure you that service revenue will grow at the
current rate in the remainder of fiscal 2008 or beyond.
A large portion of our service revenues is deferred and, in most
cases, recognized ratably over the service obligation periods,
which are typically one to three years. Service revenues
represented 17.1% and 13.1% of total revenues for the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.
International total revenues International
total revenues (including U.S. exports) increased by 14.1%
for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, as compared to the same
periods in fiscal 2007. Total revenues from Europe were
$218.5 million, or 31.7% of total revenues, for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to $194.9 million, or
31.4% of total revenues, for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Total revenues from Asia were $87.5 million, or 12.7% of
total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to
$73.3 million, or 11.8% of total revenues for the same
period a year ago. The increase in international sales was
primarily driven by the same factors outlined under the Total
Revenue discussion, as compared to the same periods in the prior
fiscal year. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
maintain or increase international revenues in the remainder of
fiscal 2008 or beyond.
Product Gross Margin Product gross margin
increased slightly to 59.7% for the first quarter of fiscal
2008, from 59.6% for the same period a year ago.
Product gross margin was impacted by:
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 123R stock compensation expenses recorded in fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales price reductions due to competitive pricing pressure and
selective pricing discounts
|
|
|
|
Increased sales through certain indirect channels, which
generate lower gross margins than our direct sales in certain
geographic regions
|
|
|
|
Higher disk content with an expanded storage capacity for the
higher-end storage systems, as resale of disk drives generates
lower gross margins
|
We expect that higher disk content associated with high-end and
mid-range storage systems will negatively affect our gross
margin in the future if not offset by increases in software
revenue and new higher-margin products.
Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of product
revenues was $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Amortization of existing technology included in cost of product
revenues was $5.3 million and $3.9 million for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Estimated
future amortization of existing technology to cost of product
revenues will be $15.8 million for the remainder of fiscal
2008, $20.4 million for fiscal year 2009,
$15.9 million for fiscal year 2010, $6.3 million for
fiscal year 2011, and none thereafter.
Software Entitlements and Maintenance Gross
Margin Software entitlements and maintenance
gross margins increased to 98.1% for the first quarter of fiscal
2008, from 96.9% for the same period a year ago.
Service Gross Margin Service gross margin
increased to 29.5% for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as
compared to 28.3% for the same period in fiscal 2007. Cost of
service revenue increased by 43.5% to $83.2 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 from $58.0 million for the
same period a year ago. Stock-based compensation expense of
$2.7 million and $2.6 million was included in the cost
of service revenue for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively.
The change in service gross margins year over year was primarily
impacted by an increase in services revenue, improved
productivity, and continued spending in our service
infrastructure to support our customers. This spending included
additional professional support engineers, increased support
center activities, and global service partnership programs.
Service gross margins will typically be impacted by factors such
as timing of technical support service initiations and renewals
and additional investments in our customer support
infrastructure. In the remainder of fiscal 2008, we expect
service margins to experience some variability over time as we
continue to build out our service capability and capacity to
support our growing customer base and new products.
25
Sales and Marketing Sales and marketing
expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, advertising
and promotional expenses, stock-based compensation expense, and
certain customer service and support costs. Sales and marketing
expenses increased 25.1% to $244.6 million for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, from $195.5 million for the same
period a year ago. These expenses as a percentage of revenue
increased to 35.4% for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 from
31.4% for the same period in the prior year due to our lower
revenue growth in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase
in absolute dollars was attributed to increased commission
expenses resulting from increased revenues, higher
performance-based payroll expenses due to higher headcount,
higher partner program expenses, and the continued worldwide
investment in our sales and global service organizations
associated with selling complete enterprise solutions.
Stock-based compensation expense included in sales and marketing
expenses for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007 was
$17.5 million and $18.7 million, respectively.
Amortization of trademarks/tradenames and customer
contracts/relationships included in sales and marketing expenses
was $1.0 million and $0.6 million for the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on
identified intangibles related to our acquisitions recorded at
July 27, 2007, estimated future amortization such as
trademarks, and customer relationships included in sales and
marketing expenses will be $2.9 million for the remainder
of fiscal 2008, $3.8 million for fiscal 2009,
$3.6 million for fiscal 2010, $2.7 million for fiscal
2011, $1.6 million for fiscal 2012, and $0.9 million
thereafter.
We expect to continue to selectively add sales capacity in an
effort to expand domestic and international markets, introduce
new products, and establish and expand new distribution
channels. We expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses
commensurate with future revenue growth. We believe that our
sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars
for the remainder of fiscal 2008 due to increased headcount,
sales- and marketing-related programs to support future revenue
growth, and real estate lease payments, partially offset by cost
control and reduction in discretionary spending efforts.
Research and Development Research and
development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits,
stock-based compensation, prototype expenses, nonrecurring
engineering charges, fees paid to outside consultants, and
amortization of capitalized patents.
Research and development expenses increased 20.2% to
$106.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, from
$88.7 million for the same period in fiscal 2007. These
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 15.5% for the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 from 14.3% for the same period in
the prior year due to our lower revenue growth in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase in absolute dollars was
primarily a result of increased headcount-related salaries and
incentive compensation, ongoing support of current and future
product development and enhancement efforts. For the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, no software development costs
were capitalized.
Stock-based compensation expense included in research and
development expenses for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007 was $13.2 million and $13.9 million. Included in
research and development expenses is capitalized patents
amortization of $0.5 million and $0.5 million for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on
capitalized patents recorded at July 27, 2007, estimated
future capitalized patent amortization expenses for the
remainder of fiscal 2008 will be $1.5 million,
$0.5 million for fiscal year 2009, $0.2 million in
fiscal 2010, and none thereafter.
We believe that our future performance will depend in large part
on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line,
develop new products that achieve market acceptance, maintain
technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of
customer requirements. We expect to continuously support current
and future product development and enhancement efforts and to
incur prototyping expenses and nonrecurring engineering charges
associated with the development of new products and
technologies. We intend to continuously broaden our existing
product offerings and to introduce new products that expand our
solutions portfolio.
We believe that our research and development expenses will
increase in absolute dollars for the remainder of fiscal 2008,
primarily due to ongoing costs associated with the development
of new products and technologies, headcount growth, real estate
lease payments, and the operating impact of potential future
acquisitions.
General and Administrative General and
administrative expenses increased 27.9% to $41.5 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, from $32.4 million
for the same period a year ago. These expenses as a percentage
of
26
revenue increased to 6.0% for the first quarter of fiscal 2008
from 5.2% for the same period in the prior year due to our lower
revenue growth in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This
increase in absolute dollars was primarily due to higher payroll
expenses, increased headcount, higher legal expenses on prior
acquisition-related costs, and increased professional fees for
general corporate matters.
We believe that our general and administrative expenses will
increase in absolute dollars for the remainder of fiscal 2008 in
order to support our existing infrastructure and real estate
lease payments, partially offset by cost control and reduction
in discretionary spending efforts. Stock-based compensation
expense included in general and administrative expenses for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007 was $6.1 million and
$7.1 million, respectively. Amortization of covenants not
to compete included in general and administrative expenses was
$0.2 million and $0.2 million for the first quarters
of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on identified
intangibles related to our acquisitions recorded at
July 27, 2007, estimated future amortization of covenants
not to compete relating to our acquisitions will be
$0.1 million for fiscal year 2008, and none thereafter.
Operating Income Operating income as a
percentage of revenue decreased to 3.6% for the first quarter of
fiscal 2008 from 9.1% for the same period a year ago. Our
operating expense levels are based in part on our expectations
as to future revenue growth, and a significant percentage of our
operating expenses are fixed and difficult to reduce within a
short period of time. As a result, if revenue levels are below
expectations or previously higher levels, our fixed expenses
could adversely affect our operating income and cash flow until
revenues increase or until such fixed expenses are reduced to a
level commensurate with revenues . We cannot assure you that we
will be able to maintain or increase revenues in the remainder
of fiscal 2008 or beyond.
Restructuring Charges In fiscal 2002, as a
result of continuing unfavorable economic conditions and a
reduction in information technology (IT) spending rates, we
implemented two restructuring plans, which included reductions
in our workforce and consolidations of our facilities. As of
July 27, 2007, we have no outstanding balance in our
restructuring liability for the first restructuring. The second
restructuring related to the closure of an engineering facility
and consolidation of resources to the Sunnyvale headquarters. In
fiscal 2006, we implemented a third restructuring plan related
to the move of our global services center operations from
Sunnyvale to our new flagship support center at our Research
Triangle Park facility in North Carolina.
Our restructuring estimates are reviewed and revised
periodically and may result in a substantial charge or reduction
to restructuring expense should different conditions prevail
than were anticipated in previous management estimates. Such
estimates included various assumptions such as the time period
over which the facilities will be vacant, expected sublease
terms, and expected sublease rates. During the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, we did not record any reduction in restructuring
reserve resulting from change in estimate of our third
restructuring plan.
Of the reserve balance at July 27, 2007, $0.5 million
was included in other accrued liabilities, and the remaining
$1.4 million was classified as long-term obligations. The
balance of the reserve is expected to be paid by fiscal 2011.
The following analysis sets forth the significant components of
the restructuring reserve at July 27, 2007
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Related Amounts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reserve balance at April 28,
2006
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
3,004
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Cash payments and other
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at April 27,
2007
|
|
$
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,084
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments and other
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance at July 27,
2007
|
|
$
|
1,931
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income Interest income was
$17.0 million and $16.7 million for the first quarters
of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in interest
income was primarily driven by higher average interest rates on
our
27
investment portfolio. We expect interest income to vary year
over year as a result of our cash and invested balances being
reinvested in a higher interest rate portfolio environment,
partially offset by lower cash balances while we continue to
fund working capital, future contractual obligations and capital
expenditures.
Interest Expense Interest expense was
$1.1 million and $3.9 million for the first quarters
of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in fiscal
2008 was primarily due to lower debt balance at July 27,
2007, as compared to July 28, 2006.
Other Income Other income was
$0.8 million for both the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007. Other income included net exchange gains from foreign
currency of $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the
first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. We believe
that period-to-period changes in foreign exchange gains or
losses will continue to be impacted by hedging costs associated
with our forward and option activities and forecast variance.
Provision for Income Taxes For the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, we applied to pretax income an
annual effective tax rate before discrete reporting items of
18.0% and 22.0%, respectively. The decrease to the annual
effective tax rate year over year is primarily attributable to a
relative decrease in the tax impact of nondeductible stock
compensation under SFAS No. 123R, brought about in
part by our decision to cease granting incentive stock options.
Since we have replaced the granting of incentive stock options
with the granting of additional nonqualified stock options, this
gives rise to the recognition of more deferred tax assets as
SFAS No. 123R expense occurs. After taking into
account the tax effect of discrete items reported, the effective
tax rates applied to the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2007 pretax income were 16.9% and 22.0%, respectively.
Our estimate of the effective tax rate is based on the
application of existing tax laws to current projections of our
annual consolidated income, including projections of the mix of
income (loss) earned among our entities and tax jurisdictions in
which they operate.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our
balance sheet and cash flow, contractual obligations and other
commercial commitments, stock repurchase program, capital
commitments, and other sources and uses of cash flow on our
liquidity and capital resources.
Balance
Sheet and Operating Cash Flows
As of July 27, 2007, as compared to April 27, 2007,
our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments increased
by $21.5 million to $1,330.3 million. We derive our
liquidity and capital resources primarily from our cash flow
from operations and from working capital. Working capital
decreased by $36.4 million to $1,016.9 million as of
July 27, 2007, compared to $1,053.3 million as of
April 27, 2007.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we generated cash flows
from operating activities of $200.9 million, as compared
with $164.6 million in the same period in fiscal 2007. We
recorded net income of $34.3 million for the first quarter
of fiscal 2008, as compared to $54.7 million for the same
period a year ago. A summary of the significant changes in
noncash adjustments affecting net income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense was $40.4 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to $43.0 million in
the same period a year ago.
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $26.7 million and
$18.7 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase was due to continued capital
expansion to meet our business growth.
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles was $6.4 million and
$4.7 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The increase was attributed to the Topio
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
An increase in net deferred tax assets of $17.8 million in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared to none in fiscal
2007, primarily due to an increase in book versus tax difference
associated primarily with increases in deferred revenue and
stock compensation tax benefits.
|
28
In addition to net income and noncash adjustments for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, the primary factors that impacted the
period-to-period change in cash flows relating to operating
activities included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable of $188.1 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 was due to lower revenue volume. A
decrease of $69.9 million in accounts receivable in the
first quarter of fiscal 2007 was due to more linear shipments.
|
|
|
|
An increase in deferred revenues of $46.5 million and
$61.9 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively, was due to the timing of recognition of
software entitlements and maintenance and service revenue as
well as renewals of existing maintenance agreements in the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
Increase in income taxes payable of $18.4 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 was attributed to the tax provision
of $7.0 million, $17.8 million book tax differences
and stock compensation tax benefits, offset by $6.4 million
income tax payments. Income tax payable decreased
$6.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 due to tax
payments of $22.5 million, which included an
$18.7 million federal income tax payment made for the
fiscal year 2006 foreign dividend repatriation, partially offset
by the first quarter tax provision of $15.4 million.
|
The above factors were partially offset by the effects of:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits decreased by
$69.9 million and $39.0 million in the first quarters
of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The changes for both
periods were due to payout of commission and performance-based
payroll expenses accrued in the last quarter of each fiscal year
and paid in the first quarter of each subsequent fiscal year.
|
We expect that cash provided by operating activities may
fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors,
including fluctuations in our operating results, shipment
linearity, accounts receivable collections, inventory
management, and the timing of tax and other payments.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were
$33.6 million as compared to $23.1 million for the
same period a year ago. We received net proceeds of
$118.1 million and $32.0 million in the first quarters
of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, for net
purchases/redemptions of short-term investments. We redeemed
$14.9 million and $16.3 million of restricted
investment and its interest income pledged with JP Morgan Chase
to repay the term loan with JP Morgan Chase in the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively (See
Note 5.) Investing activities in the first quarters of
fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 also included new investments in
privately held companies of $4.0 million and
$1.2 million, respectively.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
We used $160.4 million and $207.5 million in the first
quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, for net
financing activities, which included repayment of debt, sales of
common stock related to employee stock transactions, and common
stock repurchases. We made a repayment of $16.0 million and
$27.9 million for our debt during the first quarters of
fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. We repurchased
6.5 million and 6.6 million shares of common stock at
a total of $200.0 million and $220.0 million during
the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Other
financing activities provided $50.0 million and
$36.8 million in the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively, from sales of common stock related to
employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchases.
Tax benefits, related to tax deductions in excess of the
stock-based compensation expense recognized, of
$8.3 million and $4.5 million were presented as
financing cash flows for the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and
2007, respectively, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.
During the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, we withheld
shares with an aggregate value of $2.7 million and
$1.0 million, respectively, in connection with the
exercising of certain employees restricted stock for
purposes of satisfying those employees federal, state, and
local withholding tax obligations. The increase in the amounts
withheld year over year was due to the release of restricted
stock units assumed in connection with the Decru acquisition.
29
The change in cash flow from financing was primarily due to the
effects of higher common stock repurchases partially offset by
proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee equity
programs compared to the same period in the prior year. Net
proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to employee
participation in employee stock programs have historically been
a significant component of our liquidity. The extent to which
our employees participate in these programs generally increases
or decreases based upon changes in the market price of our
common stock. As a result, our cash flow resulting from the
issuance of common stock related to employee participation in
employee stock programs will vary.
Other
Factors Affecting Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2007, the income tax
benefit associated with dispositions of employee stock
transactions was $20.7 million and $30.0 million,
respectively. If stock option exercise patterns change, we may
receive less cash from stock option exercises and may not
receive the same level of tax benefits in the future, which
could cause our cash payments for income taxes to increase.
Stock
Repurchase Program
At July 27, 2007, $199.9 million remained available
for future repurchases under plans approved as of that date. The
stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any
time.
On August 14, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new
stock repurchase program in which up to $1.0 billion worth
of additional common stock may be purchased in addition to
$199.9 million remaining from all prior authorizations. On
August 20, 2007, we repurchased $225.0 million in
common stock pursuant to our existing and new stock repurchases
programs.
Debt
In March 2006, we received proceeds from a term loan totaling
$300.0 million to finance a dividend under the Jobs Act.
(See Note 5 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.) Loan repayments of $69.2 million are due in
the remainder of fiscal 2008. This debt was collateralized by
restricted investments totaling $101.5 million as of
July 27, 2007. In accordance with the payment terms of the
loan agreement, interest payments will be approximately
$1.6 million in the remainder of fiscal 2008. As of
July 27, 2007, we were in compliance with the liquidity and
leverage ratio as required by the Loan Agreement with the
lenders.
Contractual
Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The following summarizes our contractual cash obligations and
commercial commitments at July 27, 2007, and the effect
such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash
flow in future periods, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Office operating lease payments(1)
|
|
$
|
18,226
|
|
|
$
|
23,948
|
|
|
$
|
24,391
|
|
|
$
|
17,970
|
|
|
$
|
12,568
|
|
|
$
|
29,680
|
|
|
$
|
126,783
|
|
Real estate lease payments(2)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
7,579
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
162,110
|
|
|
|
200,557
|
|
Equipment operating lease
payments(3)
|
|
|
8,746
|
|
|
|
10,065
|
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
Venture capital funding
commitments(4)
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Capital expenditures(5)
|
|
|
13,023
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
Communications and maintenance(6)
|
|
|
14,318
|
|
|
|
15,881
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,351
|
|
Restructuring charges(7)
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
Debt(8)
|
|
|
70,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash
Obligations
|
|
$
|
126,668
|
|
|
$
|
62,615
|
|
|
$
|
48,457
|
|
|
$
|
30,234
|
|
|
$
|
22,707
|
|
|
$
|
191,790
|
|
|
$
|
482,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
For purposes of the above table, contractual obligations for the
purchase of goods and services are defined as agreements that
are enforceable, legally binding on us, and subject us to
penalties if we cancel the agreement. Some of the figures we
include in this table are based on managements estimates
and assumptions about these obligations, including their
duration, the possibility of renewal or termination, anticipated
actions by management and third parties, and other factors.
Because these estimates and assumptions are necessarily
subjective, the enforceable and legally binding obligations we
will actually pay in future periods may vary from those
reflected in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Commercial Commitments:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Letters of credit(9)
|
|
$
|
2,709
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business.
We lease sales offices, research and development facilities, and
other property and equipment under operating leases throughout
the United States and internationally, which expire through
fiscal year 2016. Substantially all lease agreements have fixed
payment terms based on the passage of time and contain
escalation clauses. Some lease agreements provide us with the
option to renew the lease or to terminate the lease. Our future
operating lease obligations would change if we were to exercise
these options and if we were to enter into additional operating
lease agreements. Facilities operating lease payments exclude
the leases impacted by the restructurings. The amounts for the
leases impacted by the restructurings are included in
subparagraph (7) below. The net increase in the office
operating lease payments was primarily due to several domestic
lease extensions during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in the above contractual cash obligations pursuant to
three financing arrangements with BNP Paribas LLC
(BNP) are (a) lease commitments of
$0.9 million in fiscal 2008; $7.6 million in fiscal
2009; $10.0 million in each of the fiscal years 2010, 2011,
and 2012; $9.1 million in fiscal 2013; and
$4.7 million in fiscal 2014; which are based on the LIBOR
rate at July 27, 2007, for a term of five years, and
(b) at the expiration or termination of the lease, a
supplemental payment obligation equal to our minimum guarantee
of $148.3 million in the event that we elect not to
purchase or arrange for sale of the buildings. See Note 13. |
|
(3) |
|
Equipment operating leases include servers and IT equipment used
in our engineering labs and data centers. |
|
(4) |
|
Venture capital funding commitments include a quarterly
committed management fee based on a percentage of our committed
funding to be payable through June 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Capital expenditures include worldwide contractual commitments
to purchase equipment and to construct building and leasehold
improvements, which will be recorded as Property and Equipment. |
|
(6) |
|
We are required to pay based on a minimum volume under certain
communication contracts with major telecommunication companies
as well as maintenance contracts with multiple vendors. Such
obligations will expire in November 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
These amounts are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
under Long-Term Obligations and Other Accrued Liabilities, which
is comprised of committed lease payments and operating expenses
net of committed and estimated sublease income. |
|
(8) |
|
Included in these amounts are the JP Morgan Chase loan (see
Note 5) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets under
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt. This amount also includes
estimated interest payments of $1.6 million for the
remainder of fiscal 2008. The decrease from April 27, 2007,
represented a loan repayment of $16.0 million, plus
interest of $1.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2008. |
|
(9) |
|
The amounts outstanding under these letters of credit relate to
workers compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate
credit card program, and a foreign rent guarantee. |
As discussed in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, we adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN No. 48). At
July 27, 2007, we have a liability of $60,241, for which we
are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate when cash
settlement with a taxing authority will occur. Accordingly, this
amount has been excluded from the table above.
31
As of July 27, 2007, we had entered into two financing,
construction, and leasing arrangements with BNP for office space
to be located on land currently owned by us in Sunnyvale,
California. These arrangements require us to lease our land to
BNP for a period of 50 years to construct approximately
380,000 square feet of office space costing up to
$113.5 million. After completion of construction, we will
pay minimum lease payments, which vary based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread (5.72%
at July 27, 2007) on the cost of the facilities. We
expect to begin making lease payments on the completed buildings
in January and September 2008 for terms of five years. We have
the option to renew the leases for two consecutive five-year
periods upon approval by BNP. Upon expiration (or upon any
earlier termination) of the lease terms, we must elect one of
the following options: We may (i) purchase the buildings
from BNP for $48.5 million and $65.0 million,
respectively; (ii) if certain conditions are met, arrange
for the sale of the buildings by BNP to a third party for an
amount equal to at least $41.2 million and
$55.3 million, respectively, and be liable for any
deficiency between the net proceeds received from the third
party and such amounts; or (iii) pay BNP supplemental
payments of $41.2 million and $55.3 million,
respectively, in which event we may recoup some or all of such
payment by arranging for a sale of either or both buildings by
BNP during the ensuing two-year period.
On July 17, 2007, we entered into additional financing,
construction, and leasing arrangements with BNP for facility
space to be located on land currently owned by us in Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina. These arrangements require us to
lease our land to BNP for a period of 99 years to construct
approximately 120,000 square feet of data center costing up
to $61.0 million. After completion of construction, we will
pay minimum lease payments, which vary based on LIBOR plus a
spread (5.72% at July 27, 2007) on the cost of the
facility. We expect to begin making lease payments on the
completed buildings in September 2008 for a term of five and
half years. We have the option to renew the lease for two
consecutive five-year periods upon approval by BNP. Upon
expiration (or upon any earlier termination) of the lease term,
we must elect one of the following options: We may
(i) purchase the building from BNP for $61.0 million;
(ii) if certain conditions are met, arrange for the sale of
the building by BNP to a third party for an amount equal to at
least $51.9 million, and be liable for any deficiency
between the net proceeds received from the third party and
$51.9 million; or (iii) pay BNP a supplemental payment
of $51.9 million, in which event we may recoup some or all
of such payment by arranging for a sale of the building by BNP
during the ensuing two-year period.
All leases also require us to maintain specified financial
covenants with which we were in compliance as of July 27,
2007. Such specified financial covenants include a maximum ratio
of Total Debt to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation
and Amortization (EBITDA), and a Minimum
Unencumbered Cash and Short Term Investments.
As of July 27, 2007, the notional fair value of our foreign
exchange forward and foreign currency option contracts totaled
$335.7 million. We do not believe that these derivatives
present significant credit risks, because the counterparties to
the derivatives consist of major financial institutions, and we
manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any
one counterparty. We do not enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Other than the
risk associated with the financial condition of the
counterparties, our maximum exposure related to foreign currency
forward and option contracts is limited to the premiums paid on
purchased options only.
In addition, we are subject to various legal proceedings and
claims which may arise in the normal course of business. While
the outcome of these legal matters is currently not
determinable, we do not believe that any current litigation or
claims will have a material adverse effect on our business, cash
flow, operating results, or financial condition.
Capital
Expenditure Requirements
We expect capital expenditures to increase in the future
consistent with the growth in our business, as we continue to
invest in people, land, buildings, capital equipment, and
enhancements to our worldwide infrastructure. We expect that our
existing facilities and those being developed in Sunnyvale,
California; RTP, North Carolina; and worldwide are adequate for
our requirements over at least the next two years and that
additional space will be available as needed. We expect to
finance these construction projects, including our commitments
under facilities
32
and equipment operating leases, and any required capital
expenditures over the next few years through cash from
operations and existing cash, cash equivalents and investments.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of July 27, 2007, our financial guarantees of
$3.5 million that were not recorded on our balance sheet
consisted of standby letters of credit related to workers
compensation, a customs guarantee, a corporate credit card
program, and a guarantee for a foreign rental obligation.
As of July 27, 2007, the notional fair value of our foreign
exchange forward and foreign currency option contracts totaled
$335.7 million. We do not believe that these derivatives
present significant credit risks, because the counterparties to
the derivatives consist of major financial institutions, and we
manage the notional amount of contracts entered into with any
one counterparty. We do not enter into derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Other than the
risk associated with the financial condition of the
counterparties, our maximum exposure related to foreign currency
forward and option contracts is limited to the premiums paid.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with third
parties in the ordinary course of business. Generally, these
indemnification agreements require us to reimburse losses
suffered by the third party due to various events, such as
lawsuits arising from patent or copyright infringement. These
indemnification obligations are considered off-balance sheet
arrangements in accordance with FASB Interpretation 45, of
FIN No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.
We have commitments related to two lease arrangements with BNP
for approximately 380,000 square feet of office space to be
located on land currently owned by us in Sunnyvale, California.
We also have a third commitment related to a lease arrangement
with BNP for approximately 120,000 square feet of data
center to be located on land currently owned by us in Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina (as further described above under
Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial
Commitments). We have evaluated our accounting for these
leases under the provisions of FIN No. 46R and have
determined the following:
|
|
|
|
|
BNP is a leasing company for BNP Paribas in the United States.
BNP is not a special purpose entity organized for
the sole purpose of facilitating the lease to us. The obligation
to absorb expected losses and receive expected residual returns
rests with the parent BNP Paribas. Therefore, we are not the
primary beneficiary of BNP as we do not absorb the majority of
BNPs expected losses or expected residual returns; and
|
|
|
|
BNP has represented in the Closing Agreement (filed as
Exhibit 10.40) that the fair value of the property leased
to us by BNP is less than half of the total of the fair values
of all assets of BNP, excluding any assets of BNP held within a
silo. Further, the property leased to Network Appliance is not
held within a silo. The definition of held within a
silo means that BNP has obtained funds equal to or in
excess of 95% of the fair value of the leased asset to acquire
or maintain its investment in such asset through nonrecourse
financing or other contractual arrangements, the effect of which
is to leave such asset (or proceeds thereof) as the only
significant asset of BNP at risk for the repayment of such funds.
|
Accordingly, under the current FIN No. 46R standard,
we are not required to consolidate either the leasing entity or
the specific assets that we lease under the BNP lease. Assuming
that this transaction will continue to meet the provisions of
FIN No. 46R as new standards evolve over time, our
future minimum lease payments under these real estates leases
will amount to a total of $200.6 million reported under our
Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies.
Liquidity
and Capital Resource Requirements
Key factors affecting our cash flows include our ability to
effectively manage our working capital, in particular, accounts
receivable and inventories and future demand for our products
and related pricing. We expect to incur higher capital
expenditures in the near future to expand our operations. We
will from time to time acquire products and businesses
complementary to our business. In the future, we may continue to
repurchase our common stock, which would reduce cash, cash
equivalents,
and/or
short-term investments available to fund future operations and
33
meet other liquidity requirements. Based on past performance and
current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, cash generated from
operations, and credit facility will satisfy our working capital
needs, capital expenditures, stock repurchases, contractual
obligations, and other liquidity requirements associated with
our operations for at least the next twelve months. However,
should we need to investigate other financing alternatives, we
cannot be certain that additional financing will be available on
satisfactory terms.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in
interest rates, market prices, and foreign currency exchange
rates. We use certain derivative financial instruments to manage
these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes. All financial instruments are
used in accordance with management-approved policies.
Market
Interest and Interest Income Risk
Interest and Investment Income As of
July 27, 2007, we had available-for-sale investments of
$807.7 million. Our investment portfolio primarily consists
of highly liquid investments with original maturities at the
date of purchase of greater than three months, which are
classified as available-for-sale. These investments, consisting
primarily of corporate bonds, corporate securities, government,
municipal debt securities, and auction-rate securities, are
subject to interest rate and interest income risk and will
decrease in value if market interest rates increase. A
hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates
from levels at July 27, 2007, would cause the fair value of
these available-for-sale investments to decline by approximately
$4.2 million. Because we have the ability to hold these
investments until maturity, we would not expect any significant
decline in value of our investments caused by market interest
rate changes. Declines in interest rates over time will,
however, reduce our interest income. We do not use derivative
financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
Our investment policy is to limit the amount of credit exposure
through diversification and investment in highly rated
securities. We further mitigate concentrations of credit risk in
our investments by limiting our investments in the debt
securities of a single issuer and by diversifying risk across
geographies and type of issuer. We have not experienced any
material losses on our available-for-sale investments.
Our investment portfolio also includes common stock holdings in
Blue Coat. We are exposed to fluctuations in the market price of
our investment in this company. As a result of these factors,
the amount of income and cash flow that we ultimately realize
from this investment may vary materially from the current
unrealized amount. A hypothetical 10 percent decrease in
the fair market value from fair market value at July 27,
2007 would cause the fair value of this investment to decrease
by approximately $1.8 million. On August 13, 2007, we
sold these shares and received net proceeds of approximately
$18.3 million, after deducting the purchasers
discounts. (See Note 16.)
Lease Commitments As of July 27, 2007,
we have two arrangements with BNP to lease our land for a period
of 50 years to construct approximately 380,000 square
feet of office space and a parking structure costing up to
$113.5 million. We also have a third arrangement with BNP
to lease our land for a period of 99 years to construct
approximately 120,000 square feet of data center costing up
to $61.0 million. After completion of construction, we will
pay minimum lease payments which vary based on London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread. We expect to pay
lease payments on the first lease on January 2008 for a term of
five years, the second lease on September 2008 for a term of
five years, and the third lease on September 2008 for a term of
five years. We have the option to renew all three leases for two
consecutive five-year periods upon approval by BNP. A
hypothetical 10 percent increase in market interest rates
from levels at July 27, 2007, would increase our total
lease payments under the initial five-year term by approximately
$4.6 million. We do not currently hedge against market
interest rate increases. As cash from operating cash flows is
invested in a higher interest rate environment, it will offer a
natural hedge against interest rate risk from our lease
commitments in the event of a significant increase in market
interest rate.
Debt Obligation We have an outstanding
variable rate term loan totaling $69.2 million as of
July 27, 2007. Under terms of these arrangements, we expect
to make interest payments at LIBOR plus a spread. A hypothetical
34
10 percent increase in market interest rates from levels at
July 27, 2007, would increase our total interest payments
by approximately $0.4 million. We do not currently use
derivatives to manage interest rate risk.
Nonmarketable Securities We have from time to
time made cash investments in companies with distinctive
technologies that are potentially strategically important to us.
Our investments in nonmarketable securities would be negatively
affected by an adverse change in equity market prices, although
the impact cannot be directly quantified. Such a change, or any
negative change in the financial performance or prospects of the
companies whose nonmarketable securities we own, would harm the
ability of these companies to raise additional capital and the
likelihood of our being able to realize any gains or return of
our investments through liquidity events such as initial public
offerings, acquisitions, and private sales. These types of
investments involve a high degree of risk, and there can be no
assurance that any company we invest in will grow or be
successful. We do not currently engage in any hedging activities
to reduce or eliminate equity price risk with respect to such
nonmarketable investment. Accordingly, we could lose all or part
of this investment if there is an adverse change in the market
price of the company we invest in. Our investments in
nonmarketable securities had a carrying amount of
$12.9 million as of July 27, 2007, and
$8.9 million as of April 27, 2007. If we determine
that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value exists for a
nonmarketable equity security, we write down the investment to
its fair value and record the related write-down as an
investment loss in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We hedge risks associated with foreign currency transactions to
minimize the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates on earnings. We utilize forward and option contracts to
hedge against the short-term impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on certain assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies. All balance sheet hedges are marked to
market through earnings every period. We also use foreign
exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted
transactions related to certain sales and operating expenses.
These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under
SFAS No. 133. For cash flow hedges outstanding at
July 27, 2007, the gains or losses were included in other
comprehensive income.
We do not enter into foreign exchange contracts for speculative
or trading purposes. In entering into forward and option foreign
exchange contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise
from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms
of their contracts. We attempt to limit our exposure to credit
risk by executing foreign exchange contracts with creditworthy
multinational commercial banks. All contracts have a maturity of
less than one year.
The following table provides information about our foreign
exchange forward and currency option contracts outstanding on
July 27, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
Notional Contract
|
|
|
Notional Fair
|
|
Currency
|
|
Buy/Sell
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value in U.S. $
|
|
|
Value in U.S. $
|
|
|
Forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
140,519
|
|
|
$
|
192,145
|
|
|
$
|
191,760
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
25,503
|
|
|
$
|
51,920
|
|
|
$
|
51,658
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
18,243
|
|
|
$
|
17,203
|
|
|
$
|
17,204
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
16,957
|
|
|
$
|
17,026
|
|
AUD
|
|
|
Buy
|
|
|
|
32,033
|
|
|
$
|
27,293
|
|
|
$
|
27,292
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Buy
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
8,164
|
|
|
$
|
8,164
|
|
Option contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
16,368
|
|
|
$
|
16,477
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
Sell
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,076
|
|
|
$
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure controls are controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report, is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
35
Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of
July 27, 2007, the end of the fiscal period covered by this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date). Based on
this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the
information relating to Network Appliance, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports
(i) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and
(ii) is accumulated and communicated to Network Appliance
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
None
The following risk factors and other information included in
this
Form 10-Q
should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently
deem less significant may also impair our business operations.
If any of the following risks actually occur, our business,
operating results, and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
Factors
beyond our control could cause our quarterly results to
fluctuate, which could adversely impact our common stock
price.
We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of
operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be
relied upon as indicators of future performance. Many of the
factors that could cause our quarterly operating results to
fluctuate significantly in the future are beyond our control and
include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions and specific economic
conditions in the computer, storage, and networking industries
|
|
|
|
General decrease in global corporate spending on information
technology leading to a decline in demand for our products
|
|
|
|
A shift in federal government spending patterns
|
|
|
|
The possible effects of terrorist activity and international
conflicts, which could lead to business interruptions and
difficulty in forecasting
|
|
|
|
The level of competition in our target product markets
|
|
|
|
Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers due to industry
consolidation, which could subject us to periodic
supply-and-demand,
price rigidity, and quality issues with our components
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
The size, timing, and cancellation of significant orders
|
|
|
|
Product configuration and mix
|
|
|
|
The extent to which our customers renew their service and
maintenance contracts with us
|
|
|
|
Market acceptance of new products and product enhancements
|
|
|
|
Announcements, introductions, and transitions of new products by
us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
Deferrals of customer orders in anticipation of new products or
product enhancements introduced by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
Changes in pricing by us in response to competitive pricing
actions
|
|
|
|
Our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products and
enhancements in a timely manner
|
|
|
|
Supply constraints
|
|
|
|
Technological changes in our target product markets
|
|
|
|
The levels of expenditure on research and development and sales
and marketing programs
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve targeted cost reductions
|
|
|
|
Excess or inadequate facilities
|
|
|
|
Disruptions resulting from new systems and processes as we
continue to enhance and adapt our system infrastructure to
accommodate future growth
|
|
|
|
Future accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting
policies
|
|
|
|
Seasonality
|
In addition, sales for any future quarter may vary and
accordingly be different from what we forecast. We manufacture
products based on a combination of specific order requirements
and forecasts of our customer demands. Products are typically
shipped within one to four weeks following receipt of an order.
In certain circumstances, customers may cancel or reschedule
orders without penalty. Product sales are also difficult to
forecast because the storage and data management market is
rapidly evolving and our sales cycle varies substantially from
customer to customer.
We derive a majority of our revenue in any given quarter from
orders booked in the same quarter. Bookings typically follow
intraquarter seasonality patterns weighted toward the back end
of the quarter. If we do not achieve bookings in the latter part
of a quarter consistent with our quarterly financial targets,
our financial results will be adversely impacted. If revenues do
not meet our expectations, our operating profit may be
negatively impacted because portions of our expenses are fixed
and difficult to reduce in a short period of time. If our
revenues are lower than expected, our fixed expenses could
adversely affect our net income and cash flow until revenues
increase or until such fixed expenses are reduced to a level
commensurate with revenues.
Due to all of the foregoing factors, it is possible that in one
or more future quarters our results may fall below our forecasts
and the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In
such event, the trading price of our common stock would likely
decrease.
We
cannot assure you that our OEM relationship with IBM will
generate significant revenue.
In April 2005, we announced a strategic partner relationship
with IBM. As part of the relationship, we entered into an
original equipment manufacturing (OEM) agreement
that enables IBM to sell IBM branded solutions based on Network
Appliance unified solutions, including NearStore and the
NetApp®
V-Series systems, as well as associated software offerings.
While this agreement is an element of our strategy to expand our
reach into more customers and countries, we do not have an
exclusive relationship with IBM, and there is no minimum
commitment for any given period of time; therefore we cannot
assure you that this relationship will contribute any revenue in
future years. In addition, we have no control over the products
that IBM selects to sell, or their release schedule and
37
timing of those products; nor do we control their pricing. In
the event that sales through IBM will increase, we may
experience distribution channel conflicts between our direct
sales force and IBM, or among our channel partners. If we fail
to minimize channel conflicts, our operating results and
financial condition could be harmed. In addition, since this
agreement is relatively new, we do not have a history upon which
to base our analysis of its future success.
Currently we do not and cannot assure you that this OEM
relationship will generate significant revenue or that this
strategic partnership will continue to be in effect for any
specific period of time.
If we
are unable to maintain our existing relationships and develop
new relationships with major strategic partners, our revenue may
be impacted negatively.
An element of our strategy to increase revenue is to
strategically partner with major third-party software and
hardware vendors that integrate our products into their products
and also comarket our products with these vendors. We have
significant partner relationships with database, business
application, and backup management companies, including
Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, and Symantec. A number of these
strategic partners are industry leaders that offer us expanded
access to segments of the storage market. There is intense
competition for attractive strategic partners, and even if we
can establish strategic relationships with these partners, we
cannot assure you that these partnerships will generate
significant revenue or that the partnerships will continue to be
in effect for any specific period of time.
We intend to continue to establish and maintain business
relationships with technology companies to accelerate the
development and marketing of our storage solutions. To the
extent that we are unsuccessful in developing new relationships
and maintaining our existing relationships, our future revenue
and operating results could be impacted negatively. In addition,
the loss of a strategic partner could have a material adverse
effect on our revenue and earnings.
We
cannot assure you that we are able to maintain existing
resellers and attract new resellers, and that channel conflicts
will not materially adversely affect our channel relationships.
In addition, we do not have exclusive relationships with our
resellers and accordingly there is a risk that those resellers
may give higher priority to products of other suppliers, which
could materially adversely affect our operating
results.
We market and sell our storage solutions directly through our
worldwide sales force and indirectly through channels such as
value-added resellers (VAR), systems integrators,
distributors, OEMs, and strategic business partners, and we
derive a significant portion of our revenue from these indirect
channel partners. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, our
indirect channels accounted for 61.4% of our consolidated
revenues.
However, in order for us to maintain our current revenue sources
and grow our revenue as we have forecasted, we must effectively
manage our relationships with these indirect channel partners.
To do so, we must attract and retain a sufficient number of
qualified channel partners to successfully market our products.
However, because we also sell our products directly to customers
through our sales force, on occasion we compete with our
indirect channels for sales of our products to our end
customers, competition that could result in conflicts with these
indirect channel partners and make it harder for us to attract
and retain these indirect channel partners. At the same time,
our indirect channel partners may offer products that are
competitive to ours. In addition, because our reseller partners
generally offer products from several different companies,
including products of our competitors, these resellers may give
higher priority to the marketing, sales, and support of our
competitors products than ours. If we fail to effectively
manage our relationships with these indirect channel partners to
minimize channel conflict and continue to evaluate and meet our
indirect sales partners needs with respect to our
products, we will not be able to maintain or increase our
revenue as we have forecasted, which would have a materially
adverse affect on our business, financial condition, and results
of operations. Additionally, if we do not manage distribution of
our products and services and support effectively, or if our
resellers financial conditions or operations weaken, our
revenues and gross margins could be adversely affected.
38
The
U.S. government has contributed to our revenue growth and has
become an important customer for us.
The U.S. government has become an important customer for
the storage market and for us; however, government demand is
unpredictable, and there is no guarantee of future revenue
growth from the U.S. government. Government agencies are
subject to budgetary processes and expenditure constraints that
could lead to delays or decreased capital expenditures in IT
spending on infrastructures. If the government or individual
agencies within the government reduce or shift their capital
spending pattern, our financial results may be harmed. We cannot
assure you that revenue from the U.S. government will
continue to grow in the future.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is
currently auditing our records under the schedule contracts it
had with us to verify our compliance with various contract
provisions. If the audit determines that we did not comply with
such provisions, we may be required to pay the GSA a potential
settlement. The exact date for completion of the audit and the
subsequent negotiation process is unknown and may not be
concluded for some time. Our management does not believe, based
upon information currently known to us that the final resolution
of our audit will have a material adverse effect upon our
consolidated financial position and the results of operations
and cash flows.
The
marketplace for our common stock has fluctuated significantly in
the past and will likely continue to do so in the
future.
The market price for our common stock has experienced
substantial volatility in the past, and several factors could
cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These
factors include but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in our operating results
|
|
|
|
Variations between our operating results and either the guidance
we have furnished to the public or the published expectations of
securities analysts
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by
investors to be comparable to us
|
|
|
|
Changes in analysts recommendations or projections
|
|
|
|
Inquiries by the SEC, NASDAQ, law enforcement, or other
regulatory bodies
|
|
|
|
Economic developments in the storage and data management market
as a whole
|
|
|
|
International conflicts and acts of terrorism
|
|
|
|
Announcements of new products, applications, or product
enhancements by us or our competitors
|
|
|
|
Changes in our relationships with our suppliers, customers, and
channel and strategic partners
|
|
|
|
General market conditions
|
In addition, the stock market has experienced volatility that
has particularly affected the market prices of equity securities
of many technology companies. Additionally, certain
macroeconomic factors such as changes in interest rates, the
market climate for the technology sector, and levels of
corporate spending on information technology could also have an
impact on the trading price of our stock. As a result, the
market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in
the future, and any broad market decline, as well as our own
operating results, may materially and adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
Macroeconomic conditions and IT spending slowdown in the United
States as well as variations in our expected operating
performance may continue to cause volatility in our stock price.
We are unable to predict changes in general economic conditions
and when global IT spending rates will be affected. Furthermore,
if there are future reductions in either domestic or
international IT spending rates, or if IT spending rates do not
increase, our revenues, operating results and stock price may
continue to be adversely affected.
39
Our
forecasts of our revenues and earnings outlook may be inaccurate
and could materially and adversely impact our business or our
planned results of operations.
Our revenues are difficult to forecast. We use a
pipeline system, a common industry practice, to
forecast revenues and trends in our business. Sales personnel
monitor the status of potential business and estimate when a
customer will make a purchase decision, the dollar amount of the
sale and the products or services to be sold. These estimates
are aggregated periodically to generate a sales pipeline. Our
pipeline estimates may prove to be unreliable either in a
particular quarter or over a longer period of time, in part
because the conversion rate of the pipeline into
contracts varies from customer to customer, can be difficult to
estimate and requires management judgment. Small deviations from
our forecasted conversion rate may result in inaccurate plans
and budgets and materially adversely impact our business or our
planned results of operations. In particular, a slowdown in IT
spending or weak economic conditions or evolving technology
generally can reduce the conversion rate in a particular quarter
as our customers purchasing decisions are delayed, reduced
in amount or cancelled. Moreover, even after contracts have been
executed, extensive analysis is required before the timing of
revenue recognition can be reliably determined; this delay
reflects both the complexity of the revenue recognition rules
applicable to software and the effect that the multiple element
arrangements and other terms and conditions can have when these
rules are applied.
If we
are unable to develop and introduce new products and respond to
technological change, if our new products do not achieve market
acceptance, or if we fail to manage the transition between our
new and old products, or if we cannot provide the level of
service and support for our new products, our operating results
could be materially and adversely affected.
Our future growth depends upon the successful development and
introduction of new hardware and software products. Due to the
complexity of storage subsystems and storage security
appliances, and the difficulty in gauging the engineering effort
required to produce new products, such products are subject to
significant technical risks. However, our new products may not
achieve market acceptance. Additional product introductions in
future periods may also impact our sales of existing products.
In addition, our new products must respond to technological
changes and evolving industry standards. If we are unable, for
technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new
products in a timely manner in response to changing market
conditions or customer requirements, or if such products do not
achieve market acceptance, our operating results could be
materially and adversely affected.
As new or enhanced products are introduced, we must successfully
manage the transition from older products in order to minimize
disruption in customers ordering patterns, avoid excessive
levels of older product inventories, and ensure that enough
supplies of new products can be delivered to meet
customers demands.
As we enter into new or emerging markets, we will likely
increase demands on our service and support operations and may
be exposed to additional competition. We may not be able to
provide products, service, and support to effectively compete
for these market opportunities. Further, provision of greater
levels of services from us may result in a delay in the timing
of revenue recognition.
Our
gross margins may vary based on the configuration of our product
and service solutions, and such variation may make it more
difficult to forecast our earnings.
We derive a significant portion of our sales from the resale of
disk drives as components of our storage systems, and the resale
market for hard disk drives is highly competitive and subject to
intense pricing pressures. Our sales of disk drives generate
lower gross margin percentages than those of our storage
systems. As a result, as we sell more highly configured systems
with greater disk drive content, overall gross margin
percentages may be negatively affected.
Our gross margins have been and may continue to be affected by a
variety of other factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Demand for storage and data management products
|
|
|
|
Discount levels and price competition
|
|
|
|
Direct versus indirect and OEM sales
|
|
|
|
Product and add-on software mix
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
The mix of services as a percentage of revenue
|
|
|
|
The mix and average selling prices of products
|
|
|
|
The mix of disk content
|
|
|
|
New product introductions and enhancements
|
|
|
|
Excess inventory purchase commitments as a result of changes in
demand forecasts and possible product and software defects as we
transition our products
|
|
|
|
The cost of components, manufacturing labor, and quality
|
Changes in service gross margins may result from various factors
such as continued investments in our customer support
infrastructure and changes in the mix between technical support
services and professional services, as well as the timing of
technical support service contract initiations and renewals.
An
increase in competition could materially and adversely affect
our operating results.
The storage markets are intensely competitive and are
characterized by rapidly changing technology. In the storage
market, our primary and nearline storage system products and our
associated storage software portfolio compete primarily with
storage system products and data management software from EMC,
HDS, HP, IBM, and Sun/StorageTek. We also see Dell, Inc. as a
competitor in the storage marketplace, primarily through its
business partnership with EMC, allowing Dell to resell EMC
storage hardware and software products. We have also
historically encountered less-frequent competition from
companies including LSI Logic. In the secondary storage market,
which includes the disk-to-disk backup, compliance, and business
continuity segments, our solutions compete primarily against
products from EMC and Sun/StorageTek. Our NearStore VTL
appliances also compete with traditional tape backup solutions
in the broader data backup/recovery space. Additionally, a
number of small, new companies are currently attempting to enter
the storage systems and data management software markets and the
near-line and NearStore VTL storage markets, some of which may
become significant competitors in the future.
There has been a trend toward industry consolidation in our
markets for several years. We expect this trend to continue as
companies attempt to strengthen or hold their market positions
in an evolving industry and as companies are acquired or are
unable to continue operations. We believe that industry
consolidation may result in stronger competitors that are better
able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. In
addition, current and potential competitors have established or
may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with
third parties. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors
or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire
significant market share. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to compete successfully against current or future
competitors. Competitive pressures we face could materially and
adversely affect our operating results.
We
rely on a limited number of suppliers, and any disruption or
termination of these supply arrangements could delay shipment of
our products and could materially and adversely affect our
operating results.
We rely on a limited number of suppliers for components such as
disk drives, computer boards, and microprocessors utilized in
the assembly of our products. In recent years, rapid industry
consolidation has led to fewer component suppliers, which could
subject us to periodic supply constraints and price rigidity.
Our reliance on a limited number of suppliers involves several
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required
components because we do not have long-term supply commitments
|
|
|
|
Supplier capacity constraints
|
|
|
|
Price increases
|
|
|
|
Timely delivery
|
|
|
|
Component quality
|
41
Component quality risk is particularly significant with respect
to our suppliers of disk drives. In order to meet product
performance requirements, we must obtain disk drives of
extremely high quality and capacity. In addition, there are
periodic
supply-and-demand
issues for disk drives, microprocessors, and semiconductor
memory components, which could result in component shortages,
selective supply allocations, and increased prices of such
components. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain
our full requirements of such components in the future or that
prices of such components will not increase. In addition,
problems with respect to yield and quality of such components
and timeliness of deliveries could occur. Disruption or
termination of the supply of these components could delay
shipments of our products and could materially and adversely
affect our operating results. Such delays could also damage
relationships with current and prospective customers and
suppliers.
In addition, we license certain technology and software from
third parties that are incorporated into our products. If we are
unable to obtain or license the technology and software on a
timely basis, we will not be able to deliver products to our
customers in a timely manner.
The
loss of any contract manufacturers or the failure to accurately
forecast demand for our products or successfully manage our
relationships with our contract manufacturers could negatively
impact our ability to manufacture and sell our
products.
We currently rely on several contract manufacturers to
manufacture our products. Our reliance on our third-party
contract manufacturers reduces our control over the
manufacturing process, exposing us to risks, including reduced
control over quality assurance, production costs, and product
supply. If we should fail to effectively manage our
relationships with our contract manufacturers, or if our
contract manufacturers experience delays, disruptions, capacity
constraints, or quality control problems in their manufacturing
operations, our ability to ship products to our customers could
be impaired and our competitive position and reputation could be
harmed. Qualifying a new contract manufacturer and commencing
volume production are expensive and time-consuming. If we are
required to change contract manufacturers or assume internal
manufacturing operations, we may lose revenue and damage our
customer relationships. If we inaccurately forecast demand for
our products, we may have excess or inadequate inventory or
incur cancellation charges or penalties, which could adversely
impact our operating results. As of July 27, 2007, we have
no purchase commitment under these agreements.
We intend to regularly introduce new products and product
enhancements, which will require us to rapidly achieve volume
production by coordinating with our contract manufacturers and
suppliers. We may need to increase our material purchases,
contract manufacturing capacity, and quality functions to meet
anticipated demand. The inability of our contract manufacturers
to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products,
or the inability to obtain raw materials, could cause a delay in
our ability to fulfill orders.
Our
future financial performance depends on growth in the storage
and data management markets. If these markets do not continue to
grow at the rates at which we forecast growth, our operating
results will be materially and adversely impacted.
All of our products address the storage and data management
markets. Accordingly, our future financial performance will
depend in large part on continued growth in the storage and data
management markets and on our ability to adapt to emerging
standards in these markets. We cannot assure you that the
markets for storage and data management will continue to grow or
that emerging standards in these markets will not adversely
affect the growth of
UNIX®,
Windows®,
and the World Wide Web server markets upon which we depend.
For example, we provide our open access data retention solutions
to customers within the financial services, healthcare,
pharmaceuticals, and government market segments, industries that
are subject to various evolving governmental regulations with
respect to data access, reliability, and permanence (such as
Rule 17(a)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) in the United States and in the other countries in
which we operate. If our products do not meet, and continue to
comply with, these evolving governmental regulations in this
regard, customers in these market and geographical segments will
not purchase our products, and therefore we will not be able to
expand our product offerings in these market and geographical
segments at the rates for which we have forecast.
42
We are
also exposed to unfavorable economic and market conditions and
the uncertain geopolitical environment.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable
economic and market conditions and the uncertain geopolitical
environment. A reduction in demand for storage and data
management caused by weakening economic conditions and decreases
in corporate spending will result in decreased revenues and
lower revenue growth rates. The network storage market growth
declined significantly beginning in the third quarter of fiscal
2001 through fiscal 2003, causing both our revenues and
operating results to decline. If the storage and data management
markets grow more slowly than anticipated, or if emerging
standards other than those adopted by us become increasingly
accepted by these markets, our operating results could be
materially and adversely affected.
Recent turmoil in the geopolitical environment in many parts of
the world, including terrorist activities and military actions,
particularly the continuing tension in and surrounding Iraq, and
changes in energy costs may continue to put pressure on global
economic conditions. If the economic and market conditions in
the United States and globally do not improve, or if they
deteriorate, we may experience material impacts on our business,
operating results, and financial condition.
Our
effective tax rate may increase or fluctuate, which could
increase our income tax expense and reduce our net
income.
Our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by several
factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we are
taxed at lower rates as compared to the U.S. statutory tax
rate
|
|
|
|
Material differences between forecasted and actual tax rates as
a result of a shift in the mix of pretax profits and losses by
tax jurisdiction, our ability to use tax credits, or effective
tax rates by tax jurisdiction different than our estimates
|
|
|
|
Changing tax laws, accounting standards, including
SFAS No. 123R and FIN No. 48, regulations,
and interpretations in multiple tax jurisdictions in which we
operate, as well as the requirements of certain tax rulings
|
|
|
|
An increase in expenses not deductible for tax purposes,
including certain stock-based compensation expense, write-offs
of acquired in-process research and development, and impairment
of goodwill
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of purchase accounting for acquisitions and
restructuring charges that may cause fluctuations between
reporting periods
|
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws
|
|
|
|
Tax assessments, or any related tax interest or penalties, could
significantly affect our income tax expense for the period in
which the settlements take place
|
|
|
|
A change in our decision to indefinitely reinvest foreign
earnings
|
The price of our common stock could decline to the extent that
our financial results are materially affected by an adverse
change in our effective tax rate. We are currently undergoing
federal income tax audits in the United States and several
foreign tax jurisdictions. The rights to some of our
intellectual property (IP) are owned by certain of
our foreign subsidiaries, and payments are made between
U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions relating to the use of
this IP. Recently, some other companies have had their foreign
IP arrangements challenged as part of an examination. Our
management does not believe, based upon information currently
known to us that the final resolution of any of our audits will
have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial
position and the results of operations and cash flows. If the
ultimate determination of our taxes owed in any of these tax
jurisdictions is for an amount in excess of the tax provision we
have recorded or reserved for, our operating results, cash
flows, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
43
We may
face increased risks and uncertainties related to our current or
future acquisitions and nonmarketable securities, and these
investments may not achieve our objectives.
As part of our strategy, we are continuously evaluating
opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that would
complement our current products, expand the breadth of our
markets, or enhance our technical capabilities. We may engage in
future acquisitions that dilute our stockholders
investments and cause us to use cash, to incur debt, or to
assume contingent liabilities.
Acquisitions of companies entail numerous risks, and we may not
be able to successfully integrate acquired operations and
products or to realize anticipated synergies, economies of
scale, or other value. Integration risks and issues may include,
but are not limited to, key personnel retention and
assimilation, management distraction, technical development, and
unexpected costs and liabilities, including goodwill impairment
charges. In addition, we may be unable to recover strategic
investments in development stage entities. Any such problems
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operation.
On occasion, we invest in nonmarketable securities of private
companies. As of July 27, 2007, the carrying value of our
investments in nonmarketable securities totaled
$12.9 million. Investments in nonmarketable securities are
inherently risky, and some of these companies are likely to
fail. Their success (or lack thereof) is dependent on these
companies product development, market acceptance,
operational efficiency and other key business success factors.
In addition, depending on these companies future
prospects, they may not be able to raise additional funds when
needed, or they may receive lower valuations, with less
favorable investment terms than in previous financings, and our
investments in them would likely become impaired.
Risks
inherent in our international operations could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results.
We conduct business internationally. For the year ended
July 27, 2007, 44.4% of our total revenues was from
international customers (including U.S. exports).
Accordingly, our future operating results could be materially
and adversely affected by a variety of factors, some of which
are beyond our control, including regulatory, political, or
economic conditions in a specific country or region, trade
protection measures and other regulatory requirements,
government spending patterns, and acts of terrorism and
international conflicts.
Our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and
in foreign currencies. An increase in the value of the
U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our
products more expensive and therefore potentially less
competitive in foreign markets. Conversely, lowering our price
in local currency may result in lower
U.S.-based
revenue. For international sales and expenditures denominated in
foreign currencies, we are subject to risks associated with
currency fluctuations. We utilize forward and option contracts
to hedge our foreign currency exposure associated with certain
assets and liabilities as well as anticipated foreign currency
cash flows. All balance sheet hedges are marked to market
through earnings every quarter, while gains and losses on cash
flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income until
forecasted transactions occur, at which time such realized gains
and losses are recognized in earnings. These hedges attempt to
reduce, but do not always entirely eliminate, the impact of
currency exchange movements. Factors that could have an impact
on the effectiveness of our hedging program include the accuracy
of forecasts and the volatility of foreign currency markets.
There can be no assurance that such hedging strategies will be
successful and that currency exchange rate fluctuations will not
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Additional risks inherent in our international business
activities generally include, among others, longer accounts
receivable payment cycles and difficulties in managing
international operations. Such factors could materially and
adversely affect our future international sales and consequently
our operating results.
We receive significant tax benefits from sales to our
non-U.S. customers.
These benefits are contingent upon existing tax regulations in
the United States and in the countries in which our
international operations are located. Future changes in domestic
or international tax regulations could adversely affect our
ability to continue to realize these tax benefits. Our effective
tax rate could also be adversely affected by different and
evolving interpretations of existing law or regulations.
Potentially adverse tax consequences could negatively impact the
operating and
44
financial results from international operations. International
operations currently benefit from a tax ruling concluded in the
Netherlands.
Our operating results have not been significantly affected by
seasonality in the past. In the future, as we expand our
presence internationally, we may experience more seasonality in
the sale of our products. For example, sales to European
customers tend to be weaker in the summer months, which is our
first fiscal quarter.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or
increase international market demand for our products.
If we
fail to manage our expanding business effectively, our operating
results could be materially and adversely
affected.
Our future operating results depend to a large extent on
managements ability to successfully manage expansion and
growth, including but not limited to expanding international
operations, forecasting revenues, addressing new markets,
controlling expenses, implementing and enhancing infrastructure,
investing in people, facilities and capital equipment, and
managing our assets. An unexpected decline in the growth rate of
revenues without a corresponding and timely reduction in expense
growth or a failure to manage other aspects of growth could
materially and adversely affect our operating results.
In addition, continued expansion could strain our current
management, financial, manufacturing, and other systems, and may
require us to implement and improve those systems. If we
experience any problems with any improvement or expansion of
these systems, procedures, or controls, or if these systems,
procedures or controls are not designed, implemented, or
improved in a cost-effective and timely manner, our operations
may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any
failure to implement, improve, and expand such systems,
procedures, and controls in a timely and efficient manner could
harm our growth strategy and materially and adversely affect our
financial condition and ability to achieve our business
objectives.
As we
continue to grow our business, we are likely to incur costs
earlier than some of the anticipated benefits, which could harm
our operating results. A significant percentage of our expenses
is fixed, which could materially and adversely affect our net
income.
We are increasing our investment in engineering, sales, service
support, and other functions to grow our business. We are likely
to recognize the costs associated with these increased
investments earlier than some of the anticipated benefits and
the return on these investments may be lower, or may develop
more slowly, than we expect, which could harm our business.
Our expense levels are based in part on our expectations as to
future sales, and a significant percentage of our expenses are
fixed. As a result, if sales levels are below expectations or
previously higher levels, net income will be disproportionately
affected in a material and adverse manner.
We
depend on the ability of our personnel, raw materials,
equipment, and products to move reasonably unimpeded around the
world. Our business could be materially and adversely affected
as a result of a natural disaster, terrorist acts, or other
catastrophic events.
Any political, military, world health, or other issue that
hinders this movement or restricts the import or export of
materials could lead to significant business disruptions.
Furthermore, any strike, economic failure, or other material
disruption caused by fire, floods, hurricanes, power loss, power
shortages, telecommunications failures, break-ins, and similar
events could also adversely affect our ability to conduct
business. If such disruptions result in cancellations of
customer orders or contribute to a general decrease in economic
activity or corporate spending on information technology, or
directly impact our marketing, manufacturing, financial, and
logistics functions, our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition,
our headquarters are located in Northern California, an area
susceptible to earthquakes. If any significant disaster were to
occur, our ability to operate our business could be impaired.
45
We
depend on attracting and retaining qualified technical and sales
personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain such
personnel, our operating results could be materially and
adversely impacted.
Our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to
identify, attract, motivate, and retain qualified technical and
sales personnel. Because our future success is dependent on our
ability to continue to enhance and introduce new products, we
are particularly dependent on our ability to identify, attract,
motivate, and retain qualified engineers with the requisite
education, background, and industry experience. Competition for
qualified engineers, particularly in Silicon Valley, can be
intense. The loss of the services of a significant number of our
engineers or salespeople could be disruptive to our development
efforts or business relationships and could materially and
adversely affect our operating results.
Undetected
software errors, hardware errors, or failures found in new
products may result in loss of or delay in market acceptance of
our products, which could increase our costs and reduce our
revenues. Product quality problems could lead to reduced
revenue, gross margins, and net income.
Our products may contain undetected software errors, hardware
errors, or failures when first introduced or as new versions are
released. Despite testing by us and by current and potential
customers, errors may not be found in new products until after
commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or
delay in market acceptance, which could materially and adversely
affect our operating results.
If we fail to remedy a product defect, we may experience a
failure of a product line, temporary or permanent withdrawal
from a product or market, damage to our reputation, inventory
costs, or product reengineering expenses, any of which could
have a material impact on our revenue, margins, and net income.
In addition, we may be subject to losses that may result or are
alleged to result from defects in our products, which could
subject us to claims for damages, including consequential
damages. Based on our historical experience, we believe that the
risk of exposure to product liability claims is currently low.
However, should we experience increased exposure to product
liability claims, our business could be adversely impacted.
We are
exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or claims
and protection of intellectual property rights, which could
adversely affect our operating results.
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business.
Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal
business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal
proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution
of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on
our business, operating results, or financial condition.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may be
subject to increased competition that could materially and
adversely affect our operating results. Our success depends
significantly upon our proprietary technology. We rely on a
combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets,
confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions, and patents
to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our
software, documentation, and other written materials under trade
secret, copyright, and patent laws, which afford only limited
protection. Some U.S. trademarks and some
U.S.-registered
trademarks are registered internationally as well. We will
continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks
as appropriate. We generally enter into confidentiality
agreements with our employees and with our resellers, strategic
partners, and customers. We currently have multiple
U.S. and international patent applications pending and
multiple U.S. patents issued. The pending applications may
not be approved, and if patents are issued, such patents may be
challenged. If such challenges are brought, the patents may be
invalidated. We cannot assure you that we will develop
proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that
any issued patent will provide us with any competitive
advantages or will not be challenged by third parties, or that
the patents of others will not materially and adversely affect
our ability to do business.
Litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary
technology. Any such litigation may be time consuming and
costly. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products
or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.
In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect
proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the
United States. We cannot assure
46
you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be
adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop
similar technology, duplicate our products, or design around
patents issued to us or other intellectual property rights of
ours.
We are subject to intellectual property infringement claims. We
may, from time to time, receive claims that we are infringing
third parties intellectual property rights. Third parties
may in the future claim infringement by us with respect to
current or future products, patents, trademarks, or other
proprietary rights. We expect that companies in the appliance
market will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as
the number of products and competitors in our industry segment
grows and the functionality of products in different industry
segments overlaps. Any such claims could be time consuming,
result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays,
require us to redesign our products, or require us to enter into
royalty or licensing agreements, any of which could materially
and adversely affect our operating results. Such royalty or
licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms
acceptable to us or at all.
Our
business is subject to increasingly complex corporate
governance, public disclosure, accounting, and tax requirements
that have increased both our costs and the risk of
noncompliance.
Because our common stock is publicly traded, we are subject to
certain rules and regulations of federal, state, and financial
market exchange entities charged with the protection of
investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are
publicly traded. These entities, including the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC, and NASDAQ, have
implemented new requirements and regulations and continue
developing additional regulations and requirements in response
to recent corporate scandals and laws enacted by Congress, most
notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our efforts to comply
with these new regulations have resulted in, and are likely to
continue resulting in, increased general and administrative
expenses and diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.
We have recently completed our evaluation of our internal
controls over financial reporting as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Although our
assessment, testing, and evaluation resulted in our conclusion
that as of April 27, 2007, our internal controls over
financial reporting were effective, we cannot predict the
outcome of our testing in future periods. If our internal
controls are ineffective in future periods, our business and
reputation could be harmed. We may incur additional expenses and
commitment of managements time in connection with further
evaluations, either of which could materially increase our
operating expenses and accordingly reduce our net income.
Because new and modified laws, regulations, and standards are
subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their
lack of specificity, their application in practice may evolve
over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and
governing bodies. This evolution may result in continuing
uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and
governance practices.
Our
ability to forecast earnings is limited by the impact of new
accounting requirements such as
SFAS No. 123R.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board requires companies to
recognize the fair value of stock options and other share-based
payment compensation to employees as compensation expense in the
statement of income. Option pricing models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock
price volatility, expected life, and forfeiture rate. We have
chosen to base our estimate of future volatility using the
implied volatility of traded options to purchase the
Companys common stock as permitted by
SAB No. 107. As of April 29, 2006, the
contractual life of our stock options was shortened to seven
years from ten years for options issued on or after this date,
and to the extent that the shorter life changes employees
exercise behavior, it may change the expected term of an option
going forward. SFAS No. 123R requires us to use
estimated forfeitures, and therefore the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R could have a material impact on the
timing of and, based on the accuracy of estimates of future
actual forfeitures, the amount of stock-based compensation
expense. Given the unpredictable nature of the Black
Scholes variables and other management assumptions such as
number of options to be granted, underlying strike price, and
associated income tax impacts, it is very difficult to estimate
stock-based compensation expense for any given quarter or year.
Any changes in these highly subjective assumptions may
47
significantly impact our ability to make accurate forecasts of
future earnings and volatility of our stock price. If another
party asserts that the fair value of our employee stock options
is misstated, securities class action litigation could be
brought against us, or the market price of our common stock
could decline, or both could occur. As a result, we could incur
significant losses, and our operating results may be below our
expectations and those of investors and stock market analysts.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
The table below sets forth information with respect to common
repurchases by Network Appliance, Inc. for the first quarter of
fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of the
|
|
|
of Shares That May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Program(1)
|
|
|
Repurchase Program(2)
|
|
|
April 28,
2007 May 25, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
54,592,913
|
|
|
$
|
399,948,323
|
|
May 26,
2007 June 22, 2007
|
|
|
5,736,313
|
|
|
$
|
30.67
|
|
|
|
60,329,226
|
|
|
$
|
224,043,703
|
|
June 23,
2007 July 27, 2007
|
|
|
785,759
|
|
|
$
|
30.67
|
|
|
|
61,114,985
|
|
|
$
|
199,948,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,522,072
|
|
|
$
|
30.67
|
|
|
|
61,114,985
|
|
|
$
|
199,948,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount represented total number of shares purchased under
our publicly announced repurchase programs since inception. |
|
(2) |
|
At July 27, 2007, $199,948,323 remained available for
future repurchases under plans approved as of that date. The
stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any
time. |
On August 14, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new
stock repurchase program in which up to $1,000,000,000 of
additional shares may be purchased.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from our Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders.
48
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1(7)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger of
Network Appliance, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Network
Appliance, Inc. (a California corporation).
|
|
2
|
.2(10)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
as of November 3, 2003, by and among Network Appliance,
Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and Spinnaker Networks, Inc.
|
|
2
|
.3(10)
|
|
Amendment to Merger Agreement,
dated as of February 9, 2004, by and among Network
Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and Spinnaker Networks, Inc.
|
|
2
|
.4(16)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization, dated as of June 15, 2005, by and among
Network Appliance Inc., Dolphin Acquisition Corp, and Decru, Inc.
|
|
3
|
.1(7)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company.
|
|
3
|
.2(7)
|
|
Bylaws of the Company.
|
|
3
|
.3(18)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the
Bylaws of the Company.
|
|
4
|
.1(7)
|
|
Reference is made to
Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
|
|
10
|
.1(29)*
|
|
The Companys amended and
Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
10
|
.2(29)*
|
|
The Companys Amended and
Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3(2)
|
|
The Companys Special
Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.4(8)*
|
|
The Companys Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.5(3)
|
|
OEM Distribution and License
Agreement, dated October 27, 1998, by and between Dell
Products L.P. and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.6(4)
|
|
OEM Distribution and License
Agreement, dated November 6, 1998, by and between Fujitsu
Limited and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.15(6)
|
|
Patent Cross License Agreement
dated December 11, 2000, by and between Intel Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.16(1)*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
entered into between the Company and its directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.17(9)
|
|
Short Form Termination of
Operative Documents, dated April 24, 2002, by and between
BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.18(11)*
|
|
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. 2000
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.19(14)*
|
|
Alacritus, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.20(13)*
|
|
The Companys Fiscal Year
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.21(15)*
|
|
The Companys Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.22(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan (Chairman of the Board or any Board
Committee Chairperson).
|
|
10
|
.24(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan (Restricted Stock Agreement).
|
|
10
|
.25(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Restricted Stock Unit Agreement).
|
|
10
|
.26(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.27(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Change of Control).
|
|
10
|
.28(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (China).
|
|
10
|
.29(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Non-Employee Director Automatic Stock
Option Annual).
|
|
10
|
.30(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Non-Employee Director Automatic Stock
Option Initial).
|
|
10
|
.31(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (France).
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.32(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (India).
|
|
10
|
.33(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (United Kingdom).
|
|
10
|
.34(19)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice
and Option Agreement under the Decru, Inc. Amended and Restated
2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
filed under Attachment II.
|
|
10
|
.35(19)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice
and Option Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan and the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan filed under Attachment
II.
|
|
10
|
.36(19)
|
|
Form of Early Exercise Stock
Purchase Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
10
|
.37(19)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Bonus
Grant Notice and Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.38(20)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated
June 20, 2003, by and between Auspex Systems, Inc. and the
Company.
|
|
10
|
.39(21)
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
July 27, 2004 by and between Cisco Systems, Inc. and the
Company.
|
|
10
|
.40(22)
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.41(22)
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.42(22)
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.43(22)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.44(22)
|
|
Ground Lease, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.45(24)
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated
March 31, 2006, by and between the Lenders party hereto and
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Network Appliance Global Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.46(27)
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.47(27)
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.48(27)
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.49(27)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.50(27)
|
|
Ground Lease, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.51(26)*
|
|
SANPro Systems, Inc. 2001 U.S.
Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.52(26)*
|
|
Topio, Inc. 2004 Israeli Share
Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.53(27)
|
|
Master Confirmation, dated
December 6, 2006, by and between JP Morgan Securities Inc.
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.54(28)
|
|
Master Confirmation, dated
March 19, 2007, by and between JP Morgan Securities Inc.
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.57
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and
the Company.
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and
the Company.
|
|
10
|
.59
|
|
Ground Lease, dated July 17,
2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(No. 33-97864). |
|
(2) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 23, 1997. |
|
(3) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated December 11, 1998. |
|
(4) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 11, 1999. |
|
(5) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated December 11, 2000. |
|
(6) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 12, 2001. |
|
(7) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 4, 2001. |
|
(8) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 15, 2004. |
|
(9) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated June 28, 2002. |
|
(10) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 27, 2004. |
|
(11) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated March 1, 2004. |
|
(12) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 4, 2005. |
|
(13) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 18, 2005. |
|
(14) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated June 2, 2005. |
|
(15) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 7, 2005. |
|
(16) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 8, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated September 2, 2005. |
|
(18) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 19, 2006. |
|
(19) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated September 2, 2005. |
|
(20) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated September 3, 2003. |
|
(21) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 31, 2004. |
|
(22) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 7, 2006. |
|
(23) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 8, 2005. |
|
(24) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 11, 2006. |
|
(25) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated October 31, 2006. |
|
(26) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated January 5, 2007. |
|
(27) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 23, 2007. |
|
(28) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated June 26, 2007. |
|
(29) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 25, 2007. |
|
|
|
Specified portions of this agreement have been omitted and have
been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request
for confidential treatment. |
|
* |
|
Identifies management plan or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
51
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
NETWORK APPLIANCE, INC.
(Registrant)
Steven J. Gomo
Executive Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: September 4, 2007
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1(7)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger of
Network Appliance, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Network
Appliance, Inc. (a California corporation).
|
|
2
|
.2(10)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
as of November 3, 2003, by and among Network Appliance,
Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and Spinnaker Networks, Inc.
|
|
2
|
.3(10)
|
|
Amendment to Merger Agreement,
dated as of February 9, 2004, by and among Network
Appliance, Inc., Nagano Sub, Inc., and Spinnaker Networks, Inc.
|
|
2
|
.4(16)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Reorganization, dated as of June 15, 2005, by and among
Network Appliance Inc., Dolphin Acquisition Corp, and Decru, Inc.
|
|
3
|
.1(7)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of
the Company.
|
|
3
|
.2(7)
|
|
Bylaws of the Company.
|
|
3
|
.3(18)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the
Bylaws of the Company.
|
|
4
|
.1(7)
|
|
Reference is made to
Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
|
|
10
|
.1(29)*
|
|
The Companys amended and
Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
10
|
.2(29)*
|
|
The Companys Amended and
Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.3(2)
|
|
The Companys Special
Non-Officer Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.4(8)*
|
|
The Companys Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.5(3)
|
|
OEM Distribution and License
Agreement, dated October 27, 1998, by and between Dell
Products L.P. and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.6(4)
|
|
OEM Distribution and License
Agreement, dated November 6, 1998, by and between Fujitsu
Limited and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.15(6)
|
|
Patent Cross License Agreement
dated December 11, 2000, by and between Intel Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.16(1)*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
entered into between the Company and its directors and officers.
|
|
10
|
.17(9)
|
|
Short Form Termination of
Operative Documents, dated April 24, 2002, by and between
BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.18(11)*
|
|
Spinnaker Networks, Inc. 2000
Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.19(14)*
|
|
Alacritus, Inc. 2005 Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.20(13)*
|
|
The Companys Fiscal Year
2005 Incentive Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.21(15)*
|
|
The Companys Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.22(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan (Chairman of the Board or any Board
Committee Chairperson).
|
|
10
|
.24(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1995 Stock Option Plan (Restricted Stock Agreement).
|
|
10
|
.25(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Restricted Stock Unit Agreement).
|
|
10
|
.26(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.27(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Change of Control).
|
|
10
|
.28(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (China).
|
|
10
|
.29(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Non-Employee Director Automatic Stock
Option Annual).
|
|
10
|
.30(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (Non-Employee Director Automatic Stock
Option Initial).
|
|
10
|
.31(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (France).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.32(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (India).
|
|
10
|
.33(23)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement
approved for use under the Companys amended and restated
1999 Stock Option Plan (United Kingdom).
|
|
10
|
.34(19)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice
and Option Agreement under the Decru, Inc. Amended and Restated
2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
filed under Attachment II.
|
|
10
|
.35(19)
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant Notice
and Option Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan and the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan filed under Attachment
II.
|
|
10
|
.36(19)
|
|
Form of Early Exercise Stock
Purchase Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
|
10
|
.37(19)
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Bonus
Grant Notice and Agreement under the Decru, Inc. 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.38(20)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated
June 20, 2003, by and between Auspex Systems, Inc. and the
Company.
|
|
10
|
.39(21)
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
July 27, 2004 by and between Cisco Systems, Inc. and the
Company.
|
|
10
|
.40(22)
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.41(22)
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.42(22)
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.43(22)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.44(22)
|
|
Ground Lease, dated
December 15, 2005, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.45(24)
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated
March 31, 2006, by and between the Lenders party hereto and
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Network Appliance Global Ltd.
|
|
10
|
.46(27)
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.47(27)
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing
Corporation and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.48(27)
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.49(27)
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.50(27)
|
|
Ground Lease, dated
December 14, 2006, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.51(26)*
|
|
SANPro Systems, Inc. 2001 U.S.
Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.52(26)*
|
|
Topio, Inc. 2004 Israeli Share
Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.53(27)
|
|
Master Confirmation, dated
December 6, 2006, by and between JP Morgan Securities Inc.
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.54(28)
|
|
Master Confirmation, dated
March 19, 2007, by and between JP Morgan Securities Inc.
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
Closing Certificate and Agreement,
dated July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
Construction Management Agreement,
dated July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation
and the Company.
|
|
10
|
.57
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated
July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and
the Company.
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
Purchase Agreement, dated
July 17, 2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and
the Company.
|
|
10
|
.59
|
|
Ground Lease, dated July 17,
2007, by and between BNP Leasing Corporation and the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(No. 33-97864). |
|
(2) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 23, 1997. |
|
(3) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated December 11, 1998. |
|
(4) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 11, 1999. |
|
(5) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated December 11, 2000. |
|
(6) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 12, 2001. |
|
(7) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 4, 2001. |
|
(8) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 15, 2004. |
|
(9) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated June 28, 2002. |
|
(10) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 27, 2004. |
|
(11) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated March 1, 2004. |
|
(12) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 4, 2005. |
|
(13) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 18, 2005. |
|
(14) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated June 2, 2005. |
|
(15) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 7, 2005. |
|
(16) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 8, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated September 2, 2005. |
|
(18) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit with the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 19, 2006. |
|
(19) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated September 2, 2005. |
|
(20) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated September 3, 2003. |
|
(21) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 31, 2004. |
|
(22) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated March 7, 2006. |
|
(23) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 8, 2005. |
|
(24) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated July 11, 2006. |
|
(25) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated October 31, 2006. |
|
(26) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Form S-8
registration statement dated January 5, 2007. |
|
(27) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 23, 2007. |
|
(28) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
dated June 26, 2007. |
|
(29) |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Proxy
Statement dated July 25, 2007. |
|
|
|
Specified portions of this agreement have been omitted and have
been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a request
for confidential treatment. |
|
* |
|
Identifies management plan or compensatory plan or arrangement. |