e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-33662
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
26-1336998
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building Two, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78746
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(512) 433-5200
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting
company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Number of Shares Outstanding as of
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share
|
|
35,857,909 |
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 |
|
|
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 |
|
|
|
|
EX-10.1 |
EX-10.3 |
EX-10.4 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,053 |
|
|
$ |
8,127 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
561,738 |
|
|
|
610,586 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
41,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
112,089 |
|
|
|
117,554 |
|
Timber |
|
|
21,810 |
|
|
|
50,989 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
Prepaid expense |
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
6,048 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
28,849 |
|
|
|
17,184 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,469 |
|
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
809,529 |
|
|
$ |
834,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
4,847 |
|
|
$ |
7,438 |
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
Accrued property taxes |
|
|
6,181 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
11,448 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,852 |
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
Debt |
|
|
237,766 |
|
|
|
337,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
306,973 |
|
|
|
380,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forestar Group Inc. shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 25,000,000 authorized shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, 200,000,000 authorized shares, 35,952,832
issued at June 30, 2009 and 35,839,390 issued at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
35,953 |
|
|
|
35,839 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
379,561 |
|
|
|
377,810 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
83,794 |
|
|
|
36,769 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 94,923 shares at June 30, 2009 and 90,819 at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Forestar Group Inc. shareholders equity |
|
|
496,518 |
|
|
|
447,292 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
6,038 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
502,556 |
|
|
|
453,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
$ |
809,529 |
|
|
$ |
834,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate sales |
|
$ |
23,069 |
|
|
$ |
17,061 |
|
|
$ |
37,128 |
|
|
$ |
39,851 |
|
Commercial operating properties and other |
|
|
5,378 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
10,106 |
|
|
|
12,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
28,447 |
|
|
|
24,118 |
|
|
|
47,234 |
|
|
|
52,561 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
24,386 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
Fiber resources and other |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,466 |
|
|
|
51,597 |
|
|
|
69,543 |
|
|
|
88,820 |
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sales |
|
|
(7,836 |
) |
|
|
(8,479 |
) |
|
|
(12,578 |
) |
|
|
(21,986 |
) |
Cost of commercial operating properties and other |
|
|
(3,991 |
) |
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
(7,807 |
) |
|
|
(8,429 |
) |
Cost of mineral resources |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of fiber resources |
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
Other operating |
|
|
(9,522 |
) |
|
|
(13,833 |
) |
|
|
(19,994 |
) |
|
|
(22,134 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(5,943 |
) |
|
|
(5,947 |
) |
|
|
(14,758 |
) |
|
|
(12,784 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,817 |
|
|
|
(33,748 |
) |
|
|
22,063 |
|
|
|
(66,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
91,283 |
|
|
|
17,849 |
|
|
|
91,606 |
|
|
|
22,016 |
|
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
(4,048 |
) |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
(4,620 |
) |
|
|
3,552 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
(10,213 |
) |
|
|
(10,668 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE TAXES |
|
|
82,232 |
|
|
|
14,937 |
|
|
|
76,868 |
|
|
|
15,054 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,120 |
) |
|
|
(4,811 |
) |
|
|
(28,805 |
) |
|
|
(4,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME |
|
|
51,112 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
48,063 |
|
|
|
10,388 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO FORESTAR GROUP INC. |
|
$ |
50,917 |
|
|
$ |
9,596 |
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
|
$ |
9,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
35,808 |
|
|
|
35,422 |
|
|
|
35,745 |
|
|
|
35,390 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
36,037 |
|
|
|
36,117 |
|
|
|
35,903 |
|
|
|
36,063 |
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
48,063 |
|
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(11,864 |
) |
|
|
(3,443 |
) |
Tax benefits not recognized for book purposes |
|
|
5,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss (earnings) of unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
|
(3,552 |
) |
Distributions of earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Distributions of earnings to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,673 |
) |
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
Non-cash real estate cost of sales |
|
|
12,262 |
|
|
|
20,863 |
|
Non-cash cost of assets sold |
|
|
36,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate development and acquisition expenditures |
|
|
(14,619 |
) |
|
|
(50,834 |
) |
Reimbursements from utility or improvement districts |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Other changes in real estate |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
Gain on termination of timber lease |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,376 |
) |
Cost of timber cut |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
2,331 |
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(821 |
) |
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Prepaid and other |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
(794 |
) |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(10,405 |
) |
|
|
1,079 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
112,437 |
|
|
|
(20,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment, software and reforestation |
|
|
(4,506 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(11,339 |
) |
Return of investment in unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
(8,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt |
|
|
(142,302 |
) |
|
|
(39,547 |
) |
Additions to debt |
|
|
42,666 |
|
|
|
70,556 |
|
Deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
Return of investment to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Payroll taxes on restricted stock and stock options |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(1,832 |
) |
Tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Other |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(99,774 |
) |
|
|
29,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,926 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,053 |
|
|
$ |
7,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Background
Prior to December 28, 2007, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Temple-Inland Inc. On
December 28, 2007, Temple-Inland distributed all of the issued and outstanding shares of our common
stock to its shareholders in a transaction commonly referred to as a spin-off.
Note 2 Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forestar Group Inc., all
subsidiaries, ventures and other entities in which we have a controlling interest, and variable
interest entities of which we are the primary beneficiary. We eliminate all material intercompany
accounts and transactions. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated pass-through entities are
recognized before income taxes. We account for our investment in other entities in which we have
significant influence over operations and financial policies using the equity method (we recognize
our share of the entities income or loss and any preferential returns and treat distributions as a
reduction of our investment). We account for our investment in other entities in which we do not
have significant influence over operations and financial policies using the cost method (we
recognize as income distribution of accumulated earnings).
We prepare our unaudited interim financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim
financial statements. As a result, they do not include all the information and disclosures required
for complete financial statements. However, in our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items
unless otherwise noted. We make estimates and assumptions about future events. Actual results can,
and probably will, differ from those we currently estimate including those related to allocating
costs to real estate and measuring assets for impairment. These interim operating results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. For further
information, please read the financial statements included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain prior year items have been reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
Note 3 New Accounting Pronouncements
In first quarter 2009, we adopted the following new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement
157 This FSP delayed the effective date of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for
certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Adoption of
this FSP did not significantly affect how we determine fair value but
has resulted in certain additional disclosures. Please read Note 10
Fair Value for disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities This
staff position specifies that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are
participating securities and should be included in the computation of
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Adoption of this
FSP did not have a significant effect on our earnings per share. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations This standard requires most
identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and
goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full
fair value. The standard also changes the approach to determining the
purchase price, the accounting for acquisition cost and several
acquisition related accounting practices. Adoption of this
pronouncement did not have a significant effect on our earnings or
financial position. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements This standard specifies that noncontrolling interests be
reported as a part of equity, not as a liability or other item outside
of equity. Upon adoption, we reclassified $6,660,000 of noncontrolling
interests to shareholders equity at year-end 2008 and we reclassified
$1,030,000 of minority interest expense to net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests for first six months 2008. The following
table presents a reconciliation of the changes in shareholders equity
in first six months 2009: |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forestar |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group Inc. |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
447,292 |
|
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
|
$ |
453,952 |
|
Net income |
|
|
47,025 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
48,063 |
|
Unrealized gain |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Other (primarily share-based compensation) |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
496,518 |
|
|
$ |
6,038 |
|
|
$ |
502,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 This standard
requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments including
how and why they are used; how they are accounted for; and how they
affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. Adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant
effect on our earnings or financial position. |
In second quarter 2009, we adopted the following new accounting pronouncements:
|
|
|
FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly This FSP provides
guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of
activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased.
Adoption of this FSP affects how we consider Level 2 and Level 3
inputs in determining fair values but did not have a significant
effect on our earnings or financial position. |
|
|
|
|
FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments This
FSP requires an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments at interim reporting periods. Adoption of this
FSP did not significantly affect how we determine fair value but has
resulted in certain additional disclosures. Please read Note 10
Fair Value for disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events Issued May 2009, this Statement
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued, introduces the concept of financial
statements being available to be issued and requires disclosures
regarding the date through which subsequent events were evaluated.
Adoption of this standard did not have a significant effect on our
earnings or financial position but does affect our disclosures
regarding subsequent events. |
|
|
|
|
SEC SAB 112 Effective June 10, 2009, amends or rescinds guidance
included in the SAB Series to make it consistent with recent FASB
pronouncements, namely, SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations, and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. Adoption did not have a significant
effect on our earnings or financial position. |
In addition, the following pending pronouncements have not yet been adopted:
|
|
|
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 This standard, issued in
conjunction with SFAS No. 167, amends SFAS No. 140, removes the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from
FIN
46(R) and
requires additional disclosures. Based upon our current understanding,
we do not believe adoption will have a significant effect on our
earnings or financial position. This new standard is effective first
quarter 2010. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) This
standard, issued in conjunction with SFAS No. 166, amends certain
requirements of FIN 46(R) to improve financial reporting related to
consolidation of and disclosures about variable interest entities. We
are currently evaluating the effect, if any, on our earnings or
financial position. This new standard is effective first quarter 2010. |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles This
Statement replaces SFAS No. 162 and establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of
authoritative accounting principles to be applied by nongovernmental
entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with
GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. Based upon our current understanding, adoption will not
have an impact on our earnings or financial position but will change
accounting guidance references in our disclosures. The Codification is
effective third quarter 2009. |
7
Note 4 Strategic Initiatives and Assets Held for Sale
In first quarter 2009, we announced our near-term strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder
value by generating significant cash flow, principally from the sale of about 175,000 acres of
higher and better use (HBU) timberland. As a result, we classified to assets held for sale about
171,000 acres of undeveloped land principally located in Alabama and Georgia with a carrying value
of $51,390,000 and related timber with a carrying value of $24,749,000.
In accordance with our strategic initiatives, in second quarter 2009, we sold about 75,000
acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama for $119,702,000 to Hancock Timber Resource
Group, which acquired the assets on behalf of its investor clients. The transaction generated net
proceeds of $116,116,000, which were principally used to reduce our outstanding debt, and resulted
in a gain on sale of $79,214,000. In addition, in second quarter 2009 we entered into a
definitive agreement with Holland M. Ware to sell about 20,000 acres of HBU timberland
in Georgia. The sale closed August 4, 2009. Please read Note 18 -
Subsequent Events for additional information about this sale.
We intend to use the after-tax cash
proceeds from this sale to reduce our outstanding debt.
At
second quarter-end 2009, we have classified to assets held for sale about 95,000 acres of
undeveloped land located in Alabama, Georgia and Texas with a carrying value of $26,486,000,
related timber with a carrying value of $13,939,000 and other assets with a carrying value of
$586,000. These assets are being actively marketed.
Note 5 Real Estate
Real estate consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Entitled, developed and under development projects |
|
$ |
447,785 |
|
|
$ |
445,394 |
|
Undeveloped land |
|
|
90,456 |
|
|
|
143,749 |
|
Commercial operating properties |
|
|
46,924 |
|
|
|
43,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,165 |
|
|
|
633,130 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(23,427 |
) |
|
|
(22,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
561,738 |
|
|
$ |
610,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in entitled, developed and under development projects are the estimated costs of
assets we expect to convey to utility or improvement districts of $75,396,000 at second quarter-end
2009 and $76,173,000 at year-end 2008, including $49,529,000 at second quarter-end 2009 and
year-end 2008 related to our Cibolo Canyons project near San Antonio, Texas. These costs relate to
water, sewer and other infrastructure assets for which the utility or improvement districts have
agreed to reimburse us. We billed these districts $3,109,000 in first six months 2009 and
$14,814,000 in first six months 2008. We collected $2,029,000 in first six months 2009 and $374,000
in first six months 2008 from these districts. We expect to collect the remaining amounts billed
when these districts achieve adequate tax bases to support payment.
We recognized asset impairment charges of $600,000 in first six months 2009 related to a
condominium project in Texas. We did not recognize any asset impairment charges in first six months
2008. Asset impairment charges are included in cost of real estate sales.
Depreciation expense primarily related to commercial operating properties was $883,000 in
first six months 2009 and $852,000 in first six months 2008 and is included in other operating
expense.
Note 6 Timber
We have about 256,000 acres of timber, primarily in Georgia. The cost of timber cut was
$1,813,000 in first six months 2009 and $1,258,000 in first six months 2008.
8
Note 7 Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures
At second quarter-end 2009, we had ownership interests ranging from 25 to 50 percent in 10
ventures that we account for using the equity method. We have no real estate ventures that are
accounted for using the cost method. Our three largest ventures at second quarter-end 2009 are CL
Realty, Temco and Palisades West. We own a 50 percent interest in both CL Realty and Temco, and
Cousins Real Estate Corporation owns the other 50 percent interest. We own a 25 percent interest in
Palisades West, Cousins Properties Incorporated owns a 50 percent interest and Dimensional Fund
Advisors LP owns the remaining 25 percent interest. Information regarding these ventures follows:
|
|
|
CL Realty, L.L.C. was formed in 2002 for the purpose of developing
residential and mixed-use communities in Texas and across the
southeastern United States. At second quarter-end 2009, the venture
had 15 residential and mixed-use communities, of which 10 are in
Texas, 3 are in Florida and 2 are in Georgia, representing about 7,500
residential lots and 560 commercial acres. |
|
|
|
|
Temco Associates, LLC was formed in 1991 for the purpose of acquiring
and developing residential real estate sites in Georgia. At second
quarter-end 2009, the venture had 5 residential and mixed-use
communities, representing about 1,560 residential lots, all of which
are located in Paulding County, Georgia. The venture also owns
approximately 5,600 acres of undeveloped land in Paulding County,
Georgia. |
|
|
|
|
Palisades West LLC was formed in 2006 for the purpose of constructing
a commercial office park in Austin, Texas. The project includes two
office buildings totaling approximately 375,000 square feet and an
accompanying parking garage. Construction of the project was completed
in fourth quarter 2008 and is approximately 68% leased at second
quarter-end 2009. Our remaining commitment for investment in this
venture as of second quarter-end 2009 is $2,579,000. Effective fourth
quarter 2008, we entered into a 10-year operating lease for
approximately 32,000 square feet that we occupy as our corporate
headquarters. |
Combined summarized balance sheet information for our ventures accounted for using the equity
method follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
CL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palisades |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palisades |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realty |
|
|
Temco |
|
|
West |
|
|
Ventures |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Realty |
|
|
Temco |
|
|
West |
|
|
Ventures |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
117,822 |
|
|
$ |
60,841 |
|
|
$ |
124,197 |
|
|
$ |
92,205 |
|
|
$ |
395,065 |
|
|
$ |
124,417 |
|
|
$ |
60,791 |
|
|
$ |
120,953 |
|
|
$ |
94,094 |
|
|
$ |
400,255 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
119,143 |
|
|
|
61,886 |
|
|
|
124,707 |
|
|
|
99,726 |
|
|
|
405,462 |
|
|
|
126,726 |
|
|
|
61,832 |
|
|
|
123,290 |
|
|
|
102,930 |
|
|
|
414,778 |
|
Borrowings, principally
non-recourse(a) |
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,838 |
|
|
|
83,836 |
|
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,638 |
|
|
|
83,737 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
51,378 |
|
|
|
86,935 |
|
|
|
148,739 |
|
|
|
8,683 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
50,548 |
|
|
|
89,580 |
|
|
|
152,381 |
|
Equity |
|
|
112,883 |
|
|
|
57,720 |
|
|
|
73,329 |
|
|
|
12,791 |
|
|
|
256,723 |
|
|
|
118,043 |
|
|
|
58,262 |
|
|
|
72,742 |
|
|
|
13,350 |
|
|
|
262,397 |
|
Our investment in real estate ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of their equity(b) |
|
|
56,441 |
|
|
|
28,860 |
|
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
16,425 |
|
|
|
120,058 |
|
|
|
59,022 |
|
|
|
29,131 |
|
|
|
18,779 |
|
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
125,227 |
|
Unrecognized deferred gain(c) |
|
|
(7,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(7,969 |
) |
|
|
(7,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(7,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate ventures |
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
|
$ |
28,860 |
|
|
$ |
18,332 |
|
|
$ |
15,515 |
|
|
$ |
112,089 |
|
|
$ |
51,963 |
|
|
$ |
29,131 |
|
|
$ |
18,779 |
|
|
$ |
17,681 |
|
|
$ |
117,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined summarized income statement information for our ventures accounted for using the
equity method follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realty |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
|
$ |
4,675 |
|
Temco |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Palisades West |
|
|
4,328 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Other ventures |
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
3,406 |
|
|
|
4,071 |
|
|
|
6,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,734 |
|
|
$ |
6,664 |
|
|
$ |
13,083 |
|
|
$ |
13,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realty(d) |
|
$ |
(5,478 |
) |
|
$ |
3,094 |
|
|
$ |
(4,974 |
) |
|
$ |
5,407 |
|
Temco |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
209 |
|
Palisades West |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Other ventures |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5,631 |
) |
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
(4,204 |
) |
|
$ |
5,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Our equity in their (loss) earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realty(c) |
|
$ |
(2,739 |
) |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
(2,487 |
) |
|
$ |
2,690 |
|
Temco |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
Palisades West |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Other ventures(b) |
|
|
(1,520 |
) |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
(2,171 |
) |
|
|
730 |
|
Recognition of deferred gain(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,048 |
) |
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
|
$ |
(4,620 |
) |
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total includes current maturities of $47,585,000 at second quarter-end 2009 and $21,150,000 at year-end 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Our share of the equity in other ventures reflects our ownership interests ranging from 25 to 50 percent,
excluding venture losses that exceed our investment where we are not obligated to fund those losses. |
|
(c) |
|
In 2003, we contributed real estate with a $13,800,000 carrying value to CL Realty in exchange for
$13,800,000 cash and a 50 percent interest in the partnership. We deferred the $14,587,000 gain on the sale
and are recognizing it as the partnership sells the real estate to third parties. The deferred gain is
reflected as an offset to our investment in unconsolidated ventures. |
|
(d) |
|
In second quarter 2009 and first six months 2009, CL Realtys loss includes an impairment charge of
$5,238,000 related to an equity investment in an unconsolidated venture. |
In first six months 2009, we invested $1,494,000 in these ventures and received $2,522,000 in
distributions; in first six months 2008, we invested $11,339,000 in these ventures and received
$5,258,000 in distributions. Distributions include both return of investments and distributions of
earnings.
Note 8 Debt
Debt consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Term loan facility average interest rate of 4.32% at second quarter-end 2009 and 4.77% at year-end 2008 |
|
$ |
136,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Revolving loan facility average interest rate of 5.12% at year-end 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,900 |
|
Secured promissory note interest rate of 2.81% at second quarter-end 2009 and 3.01% at year-end 2008 |
|
|
19,716 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Other indebtedness due through 2011 at variable interest rates based on prime (3.25% at second
quarter-end 2009 and year-end 2008) and fixed interest rates ranging from 8.00% to 9.50% |
|
|
82,050 |
|
|
|
86,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237,766 |
|
|
$ |
337,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our senior credit facility and other debt agreements contain terms, conditions and financial
covenants customary for such agreements including minimum levels of interest coverage and
limitations on leverage. At second quarter-end 2009, we were in compliance with the terms,
conditions and financial covenants of these agreements.
In second quarter 2009, we reduced our term loan by $39,000,000 and repaid our revolving line
of credit in the amount of $72,000,000 from proceeds received as a result of selling about 75,000
acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama, in accordance with our near-term strategic
initiatives.
At second quarter-end 2009, our senior credit facility provides for a $136,000,000 term loan
and a $290,000,000 revolving line of credit. The term loan and revolving line of credit may be
prepaid at any time without penalty. The senior credit facility matures December 1, 2010. The
revolving line of credit includes a $100,000,000 sublimit for letters of credit, of which
$13,071,000 was outstanding at second quarter-end 2009. Total borrowings under our senior credit
facility (including the face amount of letters of credit) may not exceed a borrowing base formula,
and include a
$35,000,000 minimum liquidity requirement at each quarter-end. At second quarter-end 2009, we
had $215,286,000 in net unused borrowing capacity under our senior credit facility.
10
At our option, we can borrow at LIBOR plus 4 percent or Prime plus 2 percent. All borrowings
under the senior credit facility are secured by (a) an initial pledge of approximately 250,000
acres of undeveloped land, (b) assignments of current and future leases, rents and contracts,
including our mineral leases, (c) a security interest in our primary operating account, (d) pledge
of the equity interests in current and future material operating subsidiaries or joint venture
interests, or if such pledge is not permitted, a pledge of the right to distributions from such
entities, and (e) negative pledge (without a mortgage) on all other wholly-owned assets. The senior
credit facility provides for releases of real estate provided that borrowing base compliance is
maintained.
We incurred origination and other fees related to our credit facility of $10,573,000, of which
$5,162,000 is unamortized at second quarter-end 2009 and is included in other assets. Amortization
of deferred financing fees in connection with our senior credit facility was $1,766,000 in first
six months 2009 and $1,739,000 in first six months 2008.
At second quarter-end 2009, commercial operating properties having a book value of $23,166,000
were subject to liens in connection with $19,716,000 of debt.
At second quarter-end 2009, entitled, developed and under development projects having a book
value of $161,343,000 were subject to liens in connection with $82,050,000 of principally
non-recourse debt.
On
July 16, 2009, we amended our senior credit facility, portions
of which were amended effective June 30, 2009. Please read Note 18 Subsequent
Events for a summary of the principal amendments.
Note 9 Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic
conditions. We principally manage exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks
through management of our core business activities. We manage economic risks including interest
rate and liquidity by managing the amount, sources and duration of our debt funding and through the
use of derivative instruments. Specifically, we may enter into derivative instruments to mitigate
the risk inherent in interest rate fluctuations.
Cash Flow Hedges
Our objective for using interest rate derivatives is to manage exposure to significant
movements in interest rates. To accomplish this objective, we use interest rate swaps as part of
our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges
involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our fixed-rate
payment over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
At second quarter-end 2009, our $100,000,000 notional amount interest rate swap agreement,
which matures in 2010, requires that we pay a fixed interest rate of 6.57 percent and receive a
floating interest rate of one month LIBOR plus 4 percent (4.32 percent at second quarter-end 2009).
We defer and include in other comprehensive income the effective portion of changes in the
fair value of our cash flow hedge. We recognize the ineffective portion of the hedge as income or
loss. The effectiveness of the hedge relationship is periodically assessed by comparing the present
value of the cumulative change in the expected future cash flows on the variable leg of the swap
with the present value of the cumulative change in the expected future hedged cash flows. In first
six months 2009 and 2008, there was no hedge ineffectiveness.
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative instrument as well as its
classification on the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments
under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
11
The change in fair value of our interest rate swap recognized in other comprehensive income
was a gain of $369,000 in first six months 2009 and a gain of $664,000 in first six months 2008. No
amounts were reclassified from other comprehensive income into income in first six months 2009 or
first six months 2008.
Please read Note 10 Fair Value for a description of how the above derivative instrument is
valued in accordance with SFAS No. 157.
Note 10 Fair Value
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, provides a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures required about fair value measurements. This pronouncement establishes a fair
value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The
fair value hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in inactive markets, and model-based valuation techniques for
which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant
inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Such inputs typically reflect managements
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
June 30, |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Financial Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
$ |
(1,371 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,164 |
|
|
$ |
15,164 |
|
Assets held
for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts represent the aggregate fair values of real estate
assets where we recognized impairment charges during the
period, as of the date that the fair value measurements
were made. The carrying value for these assets may have
subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value
reflected due to activity that has occurred since the
measurement date. |
Financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include our interest rate
swap agreement. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement was determined using quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets. In first six months 2009, the fair value of our
interest rate swap increased, and as a result, we recognized an after-tax gain of $369,000 in
accumulated other comprehensive income.
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include real estate
assets and other assets measured for impairment. In first six months 2009, certain assets were
remeasured and reported at fair value due to events or circumstances that indicated the carrying
value may not be recoverable. We determined estimated fair value of real estate assets based on the
present value of future probability weighted cash flows expected from the sale of the long-lived
assets. As a result, we recognized asset impairment of $600,000 in first six months 2009. We
determined estimated fair value of assets held for sale based on a non-binding agreement to purchase. As a
result, we recognized asset impairment of $241,000 in first six months 2009.
12
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17,053 |
|
|
$ |
17,053 |
|
|
$ |
8,127 |
|
|
$ |
8,127 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(4,847 |
) |
|
|
(4,847 |
) |
|
|
(7,438 |
) |
|
|
(7,438 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
(1,371 |
) |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
Debt |
|
|
(237,766 |
) |
|
|
(237,939 |
) |
|
|
(337,402 |
) |
|
|
(337,684 |
) |
At second quarter-end 2009 and year-end 2008, carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of
these assets and liabilities. The interest rate swap agreement is carried at its fair value. The
carrying amount of debt approximates fair value since it is primarily made up of variable-rate
borrowings. We estimated the fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings using quoted market prices for
similar securities (Level 2).
Note 11 Capital Stock
Pursuant to our shareholder rights plan, each share of common stock outstanding is coupled
with one-quarter of a preferred stock purchase right (Right). Each Right entitles our shareholders
to purchase, under certain conditions, one one-hundredth of a share of newly issued Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $100. Rights will be exercisable only if
someone acquires beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of our common shares or commences a
tender or exchange offer, upon consummation of which they would beneficially own 20 percent or more
of our common shares. We will generally be entitled to redeem the Rights at $0.001 per Right at any
time until the 10th business day following public announcement that a 20 percent position has been
acquired. The Rights will expire on December 11, 2017.
Please read Note 16 Share-Based Compensation for information about additional shares of
common stock that could be issued under terms of our share-based compensation plans.
As a result of our spin-off from Temple-Inland, all of Temple-Inlands outstanding share-based
compensation awards were equitably adjusted into separate awards: one related to our common stock,
one related to Temple-Inland common stock and one related to Guaranty Financial Group, Inc. common
stock. Guaranty was another wholly-owned subsidiary of Temple-Inland that was spun off on December
28, 2007. All awards issued as part of this adjustment are subject to their original vesting
schedules.
At second quarter-end 2009, Temple-Inland and Guaranty directors and employees held 26,000
equity-settled restricted stock awards on our stock. The following table summarizes outstanding
stock option awards on our stock held by Temple-Inland and Guaranty directors and employees at
second quarter-end 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
(Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Value Less |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term |
|
Exercise Price) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(Per share) |
|
(In years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Outstanding |
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
$ |
18.10 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
Note 12 Other Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Consolidated net income |
|
$ |
51,112 |
|
|
$ |
10,126 |
|
|
$ |
48,063 |
|
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Income tax effect of change in fair value |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
51,320 |
|
|
|
11,120 |
|
|
|
48,432 |
|
|
|
11,052 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
|
$ |
51,125 |
|
|
$ |
10,590 |
|
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
10,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Note 13 Net Income per Share
Our basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding used to compute net income
per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
35,808 |
|
|
|
35,422 |
|
|
|
35,745 |
|
|
|
35,390 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
36,037 |
|
|
|
36,117 |
|
|
|
35,903 |
|
|
|
36,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At second quarter-end 2009, the effect of 2,329,000 stock options and unvested shares of
restricted stock were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares
outstanding because their impact would have been anti-dilutive.
At second quarter-end 2008, the effect of 1,434,000 stock options and unvested shares of
restricted stock were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares
outstanding because their impact would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary
course of doing business and believe that adequate reserves have been established for any probable
losses. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these proceedings should have a significant
adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations or cash flows. It is
possible, however, that charges related to these matters could be significant to our results or
cash flows in any one accounting period.
Environmental
Environmental remediation liabilities arise from time to time in the ordinary course of doing
business, and we believe we have established adequate reserves for any probable losses. We own 288
acres near Antioch, California, portions of which were sites of a Temple-Inland paper manufacturing
operation that are in remediation. In 2008, we increased our reserves for environmental remediation
by about $2,900,000. We estimate the cost to complete remediation activities will be about
$2,500,000, which is included in other accrued expenses. Our estimate requires us to make
assumptions regarding the scope of required remediation, effectiveness of planned remediation
activities and approvals by regulatory authorities. Our estimate is subject to revision as new
information becomes available.
Note 15 Segment Information
We manage our operations through three segments: real estate, mineral resources and fiber
resources. Real estate secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our lands for
single-family residential and mixed-use communities and manages our undeveloped land and commercial
operating properties. Mineral resources manages our oil and gas mineral interests. Fiber resources
manages our timber and recreational leases.
Assets allocated by segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
677,753 |
|
|
$ |
732,401 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
Fiber resources |
|
|
22,117 |
|
|
|
51,321 |
|
Assets not allocated to segments |
|
|
108,470 |
|
|
|
50,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
809,529 |
|
|
$ |
834,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
We evaluate performance based on segment earnings before unallocated items and income taxes.
Segment earnings consist of operating income, equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures and net
income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Unallocated items consist of general and
administrative expense, share-based compensation, gain on sale of assets, interest expense and
other non-operating income and expense. All our revenues are derived from U.S. operations and all
our assets are located in the U.S. For first six months 2009, revenues from one customer of our
real estate segment exceeded 10% of our total revenues.
Segment revenues and earnings are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
28,447 |
|
|
$ |
24,118 |
|
|
$ |
47,234 |
|
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
24,386 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
Fiber resources |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
40,466 |
|
|
$ |
51,597 |
|
|
$ |
69,543 |
|
|
$ |
88,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
23,247 |
|
|
|
11,183 |
|
|
|
29,752 |
|
Fiber resources |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings |
|
|
14,698 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
|
|
22,931 |
|
|
|
38,420 |
|
Items not allocated to segments(a) |
|
|
67,339 |
|
|
|
(11,125 |
) |
|
|
52,899 |
|
|
|
(24,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
$ |
82,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,407 |
|
|
$ |
75,830 |
|
|
$ |
14,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Items not allocated to segments consists of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
$ |
(4,257 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,354 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(2,615 |
) |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
(3,528 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
(10,213 |
) |
|
|
(10,668 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,339 |
|
|
$ |
(11,125 |
) |
|
$ |
52,899 |
|
|
$ |
(24,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In second quarter 2009, gain on sale of assets of $79,214,000 represents our gain from selling
about 75,000 acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama for $119,702,000 to Hancock
Timber Resource Group, which acquired the assets on behalf of its investor clients.
Share-based compensation increased principally due to our higher stock price in second quarter
2009 associated with our cash settled equity awards.
In first six months 2009, general and administrative expense includes $3,180,000 paid to
outside advisors regarding an evaluation by our Board of Directors of an unsolicited shareholder
proposal.
Note 16 Share-Based Compensation
Post-Spin Awards
A summary of the awards granted under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan follows.
15
Cash-settled awards
Cash-settled awards granted to our employees in the form of restricted stock units or stock
appreciation rights vest over two to four years from the date of grant and generally provide for
accelerated vesting upon death, disability or if there is a change in control. Vesting for some
awards is also conditioned upon achievement of a minimum one percent annualized return on assets
over a three-year period.
Cash-settled awards granted to our directors in the form of restricted stock units are fully
vested at the time of grant and payable upon retirement.
The following table summarizes the activity of awards granted under our plan for first six
months 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(Per unit) |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
28.85 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
8.65 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
28.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
5.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In first six months 2009, we paid $22,000 to settle vested cash awards. The aggregate current
value of non-vested awards at second quarter-end 2009 is $5,097,000.
Equity-settled awards
There were no equity-settled awards in the form of restricted stock units granted in first six
months 2009, and there were no unvested equity-settled restricted stock unit awards at second
quarter-end 2009.
Restricted stock
Restricted stock awards vest after three years if we achieve a minimum one percent annualized
return on assets over such three-year period. The following table summarizes the activity of awards
granted under our plan for first six months 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(Per share) |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
207 |
|
|
$ |
21.89 |
|
Granted |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
9.29 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
28.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
316 |
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate current value of non-vested awards at second quarter-end 2009 is $3,752,000, or
$11.88 per share.
Stock options
Stock options have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over three to four
years and provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if
there is a change in control. Options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value
of our stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes the activity of awards granted
under our plan for first six months 2009:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(Per share) |
|
|
(In years) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
$ |
28.85 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Granted |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
9.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
28.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
780 |
|
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
183 |
|
|
$ |
28.85 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $419,000 at second quarter-end
2009. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercisable at second quarter-end
2009.
Stock options are valued based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Awards granted in
first six months 2009 were valued based upon the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Expected life of options (years) |
|
|
6 |
|
Weighted average estimated fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
We have limited historical experience as a stand alone company so we utilized alternative
methods in determining our valuation assumptions. The expected life was based on the simplified
method utilizing the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual life of the awards.
The expected stock price volatility was based on historical prices of our peers common stock for a
period corresponding to the expected life of the options. Pre-vesting forfeitures are estimated
based upon the pool of participants and their expected activity.
Pre-Spin Awards
Prior to the spin-off, we participated in Temple-Inlands share-based compensation plans, and
as a result, certain of our employees received share-based compensation in the form of restricted
or performance stock units, restricted stock or options to purchase shares of Temple-Inlands
common stock. Concurrent with Temple-Inlands distribution of our common stock, all outstanding
Temple-Inland awards were adjusted into three separate awards: one related to Forestar common
stock, one related to Guaranty common stock and one related to Temple-Inland common stock.
Cash-settled awards
Cash-settled awards generally vest and are paid after three years from the date of grant or
the attainment of defined performance goals, generally measured over a three-year period. A summary
of cash-settled awards outstanding to our employees at second quarter-end 2009, following the
adjustments described previously, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Equivalent |
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Awards on Forestar stock |
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
Awards on Guaranty stock |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Awards on Temple-Inland stock |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In first six months 2009, we paid $394,000 to settle vested cash awards.
17
Stock options
Stock options have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over four years and
provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if there is a
change in control. Options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of
Temple-Inland common stock on the date of grant. A summary of stock option awards outstanding to
our employees at second quarter-end 2009, following the adjustments described previously, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
(Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value Less |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Exercise Price) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(Per share) |
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Outstanding on Forestar stock |
|
|
86 |
|
|
$ |
21.12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Outstanding on Guaranty stock |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
13.55 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding on Temple-Inland stock |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
16.89 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable on Forestar stock |
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
19.34 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Exercisable on Guaranty stock |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
12.41 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable on Temple-Inland stock |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
15.47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No options were exercised in first six months 2009.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense for post-spin and pre-spin awards consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash-settled awards |
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
Equity-settled awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
525 |
|
|
$ |
2,722 |
|
|
$ |
2,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation increased in second quarter and first six months 2009 principally due to a greater number of cash-settled awards issued in 2009.
The fair value of awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and expensed at the date of
grant was $135,000 in first six months 2009 and $1,321,000 in first six months 2008.
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense is included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
$ |
1,686 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
$ |
2,882 |
|
|
$ |
2,429 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,615 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
4,321 |
|
|
$ |
3,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not capitalize any share-based compensation in first six months 2009 or 2008.
18
Unrecognized share-based compensation for post-spin awards not vested was $6,969,000 at second
quarter-end 2009. The weighted average period over which this amount will be recognized is
estimated to be 2.2 years. Unrecognized share-based compensation for pre-spin awards not vested was
$348,000 at second quarter-end 2009. The weighted average period over which this amount will be
recognized is estimated to be 1.0 years.
In connection with restricted stock vested and stock options exercised, we withheld shares
having a value of $31,000 for payment of payroll taxes in first six months 2009. These shares are
accounted for as treasury stock. Payroll taxes on restricted stock and stock options are reflected
in financing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
Note 17 Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 38% in second quarter 2009 and 37% in first six months 2009 both of
which include less than a 1% benefit attributable to noncontrolling interests. Our effective tax
rate was 32% in second quarter 2008 and 31% in first six months 2008 both of which include about a
2% benefit attributable to noncontrolling interests as well as benefits from percentage depletion
and a federal income tax rate change for qualified timber gains due to the Food, Conservation and
Energy Act of 2008. As a result of our adoption of SFAS No. 160, income before income taxes
includes income from pass-through entities allocable to noncontrolling interests for which there is
no income tax provided.
We anticipate that our effective tax rate in 2009 will be about 37% of which less than 1% will
be attributable to noncontrolling interests.
We have not provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset because we believe it is
likely it will be recoverable in future periods.
In second quarter 2009, we recorded a liability of $5,291,000 related to tax benefits not
recognized for book purposes, which is included in other liabilities.
Note 18 Subsequent Events
We
have evaluated subsequent events through August 6, 2009, the date of
issuance of these financial
statements.
On
July 16, 2009, we amended the terms of our senior credit
facility, portions of which were amended effective June 30, 2009. The principal amendments
were to maintain the interest coverage ratio at 1.50x through December 31, 2009 and, thereafter,
adjust to 1.75x; to provide us with the option to extend the maturity date for up to $350,000,000
through June 30, 2012; to reduce the aggregate commitments by $850 per acre of HBU timberland sold
pursuant to our near-term strategic initiatives, with such reduction being split 60% to reduce the
term loan commitment and 40% to reduce the revolver commitment; to provide that if the interest
coverage ratio is less than 2.0x, we will not be permitted to make any company or asset
acquisitions without prior approval of the administrative agent; to include all our timberland and
high value timberland as collateral and to add a new financial covenant requiring a minimum defined
collateral-to-total commitment ratio of 1.75x; to revise the calculation of the consolidated
tangible net worth covenant to increase the percentage of our cumulative positive net income
included in the calculation from 50% to 75%; to add an additional requirement in the event we
desire to pay a dividend on or repurchase our outstanding shares that we have a minimum pro-forma
liquidity of $125,000,000 immediately after such payment; to revise the minimum liquidity financial
covenant to require a minimum available liquidity at least equal to the lesser of the existing
$35,000,000 requirement or 7.5% of the aggregate commitment under the senior credit facility; to
establish a minimum interest rate floor of 2% per annum on non-hedged loans; and to increase the
interest margin added to the LIBOR and base rate loans by 0.5% per annum. We incurred fees of
$2,955,000 related to these amendments. Assuming the sale of about 175,000 acres of HBU timberland
in accordance with our near-term strategic initiatives, the total aggregate commitment under
our senior credit facility will be $316,250,000, consisting of $85,750,000
under the term loan and $230,500,000 under the revolving line of credit.
On
August 4, 2009, we completed our previously announced sale of about 20,000 acres
of timber and timberland in Georgia to St. Regis Paper Company, LLC, assignee of Holland M. Ware,
for approximately $39,500,000 in a cash transaction. We intend to use the proceeds from this sale to reduce
outstanding debt in accordance with our near-term strategic initiatives.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless
otherwise indicated, information is presented as of June 30, 2009, and references to acreage owned
include all acres owned by ventures regardless of our ownership interest in a venture.
19
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other materials we have filed or may file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and
phrases such as believe, anticipate, could, estimate, likely, intend, may, plan,
expect, and similar expressions, including references to assumptions. These statements reflect
our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risk and uncertainties. We note
that a variety of factors and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ significantly
from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors and uncertainties that might
cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
general economic, market or business conditions; |
|
|
|
|
economic, market or business conditions in Texas or Georgia, where our real estate activities are concentrated; |
|
|
|
|
the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to us and that we may pursue; |
|
|
|
|
future residential or commercial entitlements; |
|
|
|
|
expected development timetables and projected timing for sales of lots or other parcels of land; |
|
|
|
|
development approvals and the ability to obtain such approvals; |
|
|
|
|
the anticipated price ranges of lots in our developments; |
|
|
|
|
the number, price and timing of land sales or acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
absorption rates and expected gains on land and lot sales; |
|
|
|
|
the levels of resale inventory in our development projects and the regions in which they are located; |
|
|
|
|
the development of relationships with strategic partners; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in costs and expenses; |
|
|
|
|
demand for new housing, which can be affected by the availability of mortgage credit; |
|
|
|
|
government energy policies; |
|
|
|
|
demand for oil and gas; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
competitive actions by other companies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or regulations and actions or restrictions of regulatory agencies; |
|
|
|
|
the results of financing efforts, including our ability to obtain financing with favorable terms; |
|
|
|
|
our partners ability to fund their capital commitments; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans; regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of a
merger, acquisition or divestiture; and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition or divestiture; |
|
|
|
|
the final resolutions or outcomes with respect to our contingent and other corporate liabilities related to our business; and |
|
|
|
|
our customers may be unwilling or unable to meet lot takedown commitments due to liquidity limitations or slowing market
conditions. |
20
Other factors, including the risk factors described in Item 1A of our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by our
forward-looking statements. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to
predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from
those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and,
except as required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any
updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the
date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Background
Prior to December 28, 2007, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Temple-Inland Inc. On
December 28, 2007, Temple-Inland distributed all our issued and outstanding shares of common stock
to its shareholders in a transaction commonly referred to as a spin-off. In 2008, we operated our
first full year as a stand-alone public company and the following discussion and analysis reflect
the post-spin results of operations and the effect on our financial condition.
Strategy
Our strategy is to maximize and grow long-term shareholder value through:
|
|
|
Entitlement and development of real estate; |
|
|
|
|
Realization of value from minerals, water and fiber resources; and |
|
|
|
|
Strategic and disciplined investment in our business. |
In first quarter 2009, we announced our near-term strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder
value by generating significant cash flow, principally from the sale of about 175,000 acres of
higher and better use (HBU) timberland. As a result, we classified to assets held for sale about
171,000 acres of undeveloped land principally located in Alabama and Georgia with a carrying value
of $51,390,000 and related timber with a carrying value of $24,749,000.
In accordance with our strategic initiatives, in second quarter 2009, we sold about 75,000
acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama for $119,702,000 to Hancock Timber Resource
Group, which acquired the assets on behalf of its investor clients. The transaction generated net
proceeds of $116,116,000, which were principally used to reduce our outstanding debt, and resulted
in a gain on sale of $79,214,000. In addition, in second quarter 2009, we entered into a
definitive agreement with Holland M. Ware to sell about 20,000 acres of HBU timberland in
Georgia for approximately $39,500,000 in a cash transaction. The sale
closed August 4, 2009. We intend to use the after-tax cash
proceeds from this sale to reduce our outstanding debt.
At
second quarter-end 2009, we have classified to assets held for sale about 95,000 acres of
undeveloped land located in Alabama, Georgia and Texas with a carrying value of $26,486,000,
related timber with a carrying value of $13,939,000 and other assets with a carrying value of
$586,000. These assets are being actively marketed.
Results of Operations
Net income was $50,917,000, or $1.42 per basic share and $1.41 per diluted share, in second
quarter 2009, compared with $9,596,000, or $0.27 per basic and diluted share, in second quarter
2008. Net income for first six months 2009 was $47,025,000, or $1.32 per basic share and $1.31 per
diluted share, compared with $9,358,000, or $0.26 per basic and diluted share, in first six months
2008.
A summary of our consolidated results follows:
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
28,447 |
|
|
$ |
24,118 |
|
|
$ |
47,234 |
|
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
24,386 |
|
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
Fiber resources |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
40,466 |
|
|
$ |
51,597 |
|
|
$ |
69,543 |
|
|
$ |
88,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
Mineral resources |
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
23,247 |
|
|
|
11,183 |
|
|
|
29,752 |
|
Fiber resources |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings |
|
|
14,698 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
|
|
22,931 |
|
|
|
38,420 |
|
Items not allocated to segments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
(4,257 |
) |
|
|
(5,348 |
) |
|
|
(11,876 |
) |
|
|
(10,354 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(2,615 |
) |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
(3,528 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
(10,213 |
) |
|
|
(10,668 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
82,037 |
|
|
|
14,407 |
|
|
|
75,830 |
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,120 |
) |
|
|
(4,811 |
) |
|
|
(28,805 |
) |
|
|
(4,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
|
$ |
50,917 |
|
|
$ |
9,596 |
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
|
$ |
9,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant aspects of our results of operations follow:
Second Quarter and First Six Months 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
Real Estate segment earnings increased principally from selling more
undeveloped land. As market conditions for residential and commercial
real estate continued to deteriorate, we allocated additional
resources and focused our marketing efforts on our retail land sales
program. |
|
|
|
|
Mineral Resources segment earnings declined principally due to lower
lease bonus revenues and decreased royalty revenues as a result of
lower oil and natural gas prices. In first six months 2008, segment
earnings included $20,567,000 in lease bonus revenues from leasing
about 52,700 net mineral acres. |
|
|
|
|
Fiber Resources segment earnings increased principally from increased
volume and prices related to a higher mix of larger pine sawtimber
sold from our Texas forest. In first six months 2008, segment earnings
included a gain from partial termination of a timber lease. |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets represents our gain from selling about 75,000
acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama for $119,702,000
to Hancock Timber Resource Group, which acquired the assets on behalf
of its investor clients. The transaction generated net proceeds of
$116,116,000, which were principally used to reduce our outstanding
debt, and resulted in a gain on sale of $79,214,000. |
|
|
|
|
In first six months 2009, general and administrative expense includes
$3,180,000 paid to outside advisors regarding an evaluation by our
Board of Directors of an unsolicited shareholder proposal. Excluding
the costs associated with the unsolicited shareholder proposal, our
general and administrative expenses have declined as result of
execution of our near-term strategic initiatives to lower costs. |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation increased in second quarter and first six months 2009
principally due to a greater number of cash-settled awards issued in 2009. |
Current Market Conditions
Current market conditions in the residential development industry are extremely difficult due
to the oversupply of housing, diminished sales volume and sales prices for existing and new homes
and a significant tightening of mortgage credit. Consumer confidence is near or at an all time low.
Many home builders are experiencing liquidity shortfalls and are unwilling or unable to close lot
purchases. All geographic markets
22
and products have not been affected to the same extent or with equal severity but most have
experienced declines. It is likely these conditions will continue throughout 2009.
Oil prices have increased principally due to reduced supply and lower levels of production.
Natural gas prices have continued to decline as higher production and lower demand have negatively
impacted prices. Exploration and production companies have reduced capital expenditures for lease
acquisition and production due to lower demand and higher inventories. These conditions may impact
the demand for new mineral leases, new exploration activity and the amount of royalty revenues we
receive.
Pulpwood demand is relatively stable in our markets. However, sawtimber prices have declined
due to the decrease in demand for solid wood products consistent with the decline in the housing
industry.
Business Segments
We manage our operations through three business segments:
|
|
|
Real estate, |
|
|
|
|
Mineral resources, and |
|
|
|
|
Fiber resources. |
We evaluate performance based on earnings before unallocated items and income taxes. Segment
earnings consist of operating income, equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures and net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests. Unallocated items consist of general and administrative
expense, share-based compensation, gain on sale of assets, interest expense and other non-operating
income and expense. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
accounting policy note to the consolidated financial statements.
We operate in cyclical industries. Our operations are affected to varying degrees by supply
and demand factors and economic conditions including changes in interest rates, availability of
mortgage credit, consumer sentiment, new housing starts, real estate values, employment levels,
changes in the market prices for oil, gas and timber and the overall strength or weakness of the
U.S. economy.
Real Estate
We own directly or through ventures over 280,000 acres of real estate located in nine states
and 12 markets. Our real estate segment secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our
lands, primarily for single-family residential and mixed-use communities. We own about 215,000
acres in a broad area around Atlanta, Georgia, with the balance located primarily in Texas. We
target investments principally in our strategic growth corridors, regions across the southern half
of the United States that possess key demographic and growth characteristics that we believe make
them attractive for long-term real estate investment. We own and manage our projects either
directly or through ventures. Our real estate segment revenues are principally derived from the
sales of residential single-family lots, undeveloped land sales and commercial real estate and to a
lesser degree from the operation of commercial properties, primarily a hotel.
A summary of our real estate results follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
28,447 |
|
|
$ |
24,118 |
|
|
$ |
47,234 |
|
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(11,827 |
) |
|
|
(13,043 |
) |
|
|
(20,385 |
) |
|
|
(30,415 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
(7,354 |
) |
|
|
(11,438 |
) |
|
|
(15,519 |
) |
|
|
(19,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,266 |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
(4,064 |
) |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
(4,743 |
) |
|
|
2,517 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
5,007 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In second quarter 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $2,682,000 in property
taxes, $1,281,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $577,000 in professional services,
$510,000 in depreciation, $509,000 in community maintenance and $378,000 in marketing and
23
advertising. In second quarter 2008, operating expenses principally consist of a $3,500,000
charge principally related to environmental remediation activities, $2,287,000 in property taxes,
$2,174,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $523,000 in depreciation, $476,000 in marketing
and advertising, $405,000 in professional services and $135,000 in community maintenance.
In first six months 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $5,508,000 in property
taxes, $3,083,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $1,076,000 in professional services,
$1,038,000 in depreciation, $628,000 in community maintenance and $569,000 in marketing and
advertising. In first six months 2008, operating expenses principally consist of a $3,500,000
charge principally related to environmental remediation activities, $5,020,000 in property taxes,
$4,140,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $1,275,000 in professional services, $982,000 in
depreciation, $893,000 in marketing and advertising and $219,000 in community maintenance.
CL Realty, a venture in which we own a 50 percent interest, recognized an impairment charge of
$5,238,000 related to an equity investment in an unconsolidated venture. Our share of the loss is
$2,619,000 and is included in equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated ventures in second
quarter 2009 and first six months 2009.
Revenues in our owned and consolidated ventures consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential real estate |
|
$ |
6,229 |
|
|
$ |
10,261 |
|
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
|
$ |
24,931 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
Undeveloped land |
|
|
16,840 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
25,144 |
|
|
|
9,228 |
|
Commercial operating properties |
|
|
4,698 |
|
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
9,290 |
|
|
|
11,373 |
|
Other |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
28,447 |
|
|
$ |
24,118 |
|
|
$ |
47,234 |
|
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units sold in our owned and consolidated ventures consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots sold |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Revenue per lot sold |
|
$ |
59,328 |
|
|
$ |
58,631 |
|
|
$ |
64,699 |
|
|
$ |
48,867 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Revenue per acre sold |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251,313 |
|
|
$ |
424,696 |
|
|
$ |
153,215 |
|
Undeveloped land: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres sold |
|
|
7,460 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
9,652 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
Revenue per acre sold |
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
5,893 |
|
|
$ |
2,605 |
|
|
$ |
4,978 |
|
Residential real estate revenues principally consist of the sale of single-family lots to
national, regional and local homebuilders. In second quarter 2009 and first six months 2009,
residential real estate revenues continued to decline as a result of decreased demand for
single-family lots due to the overall decline in the housing industry. In first six months 2008,
residential lots sold include the sale of 192 high density lots for approximately $24,300 per lot.
We expect difficult housing markets and credit conditions throughout 2009.
In second quarter 2009, we sold 7,460 acres of undeveloped land from our owned and
consolidated ventures at an average price of $2,257 per acre, generating $16,840,000 in revenues.
In second quarter 2008, we sold 504 acres of undeveloped land from our owned and consolidated
ventures at an average price of $5,893 per acre, generating $2,971,000 in revenues.
In first six months 2009, we sold 9,652 acres of undeveloped land from our owned and
consolidated ventures at an average price of $2,605 per acre, generating $25,144,000 in revenues.
In first six months 2008, we sold 1,853 acres of undeveloped land from our owned and consolidated
ventures at an average price of $4,978 per acre, generating $9,228,000 in revenues.
Information about our real estate projects and our real estate ventures follows:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter-End |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Owned and consolidated ventures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entitled, developed and under development projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Residential lots remaining |
|
|
20,582 |
|
|
|
20,737 |
|
Commercial acres remaining |
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
Undeveloped land and land in the entitlement process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Acres in entitlement process |
|
|
32,520 |
|
|
|
32,680 |
|
Acres undeveloped(a) |
|
|
224,616 |
|
|
|
312,880 |
|
Ventures accounted for using the equity method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventures lot sales (for first six months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots sold |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Revenue per lot sold |
|
$ |
63,835 |
|
|
$ |
52,549 |
|
Ventures entitled, developed and under development projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Residential lots remaining |
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
Commercial acres sold (for first six months) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Revenue per acre sold |
|
$ |
196,996 |
|
|
$ |
281,600 |
|
Commercial acres remaining |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Ventures undeveloped land and land in the entitlement process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Acres in entitlement process |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Acres sold (for first six months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per acre sold |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Acres undeveloped |
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 95,000 acres classified as assets held for sale. |
Mineral Resources
We own directly or through ventures about 622,000 net acres of oil and gas mineral interests.
Our mineral resources segment is focused on maximizing the value from royalties and other lease
revenues from our oil and gas mineral interests located in Texas, Louisiana, Alabama and Georgia.
At second quarter-end 2009, we have about 124,000 net acres under lease and about 26,000 net acres
held by production.
A summary of our mineral resources results follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
7,018 |
|
|
$ |
24,386 |
|
|
$ |
12,939 |
|
|
$ |
30,654 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
(1,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
22,996 |
|
|
|
11,060 |
|
|
|
28,717 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
6,401 |
|
|
$ |
23,247 |
|
|
$ |
11,183 |
|
|
$ |
29,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In second quarter 2009 and first six months 2009, cost of sales represents our share of costs
related to our non-operating working interests.
In second quarter 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $254,000 in employee
compensation and benefits, $180,000 in production severance taxes, $191,000 in contract labor and
contract services and $66,000 in property taxes. These expenses were partially offset by a refund
of production severance taxes of $255,000 related to well status changes approved by the Texas
Railroad Commission. In second quarter
2008, operating expenses principally consist of $678,000 in
production severance taxes which were previously reflected as a reduction of revenue and $467,000
in contract labor and contract services.
25
In first six months 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $697,000 in employee
compensation and benefits, $450,000 in production severance taxes, $311,000 in contract labor and
contract services, $132,000 in property taxes, and $95,000 in data processing. These expenses were
partially offset by a refund of production severance taxes of $255,000 related to well status
changes approved by the Texas Railroad Commission. In first six months 2008, operating expenses
principally consist of $737,000 in contract labor and contract services as we resourced our
operations with a contract workforce while recruiting our minerals team, $678,000 in production
severance taxes and $93,000 in property taxes.
In first six months 2009, equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures includes our share of
royalty revenues related to production activity from a venture with mineral interest located within
the Barnett Shale natural gas formation. In first six months 2008, equity in earnings of
unconsolidated ventures includes our share of a lease bonus payment as result of leasing 241 net
mineral acres for $1,568,000.
Revenues consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties |
|
$ |
2,401 |
|
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
$ |
5,879 |
|
|
$ |
8,440 |
|
Other lease revenues |
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
19,284 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
7,018 |
|
|
$ |
24,386 |
|
|
$ |
12,939 |
|
|
$ |
30,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information about our royalties(a) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Oil production (barrels) |
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
42,700 |
|
Average price per barrel |
|
$ |
48.12 |
|
|
$ |
98.94 |
|
|
$ |
47.67 |
|
|
$ |
91.97 |
|
Natural gas production (millions of cubic feet) |
|
|
309.8 |
|
|
|
276.5 |
|
|
|
704.5 |
|
|
|
532.5 |
|
Average price per thousand cubic feet |
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
|
$ |
6.89 |
|
In second quarter 2009, other lease revenues include $2,916,000 in lease bonus payments as a
result of leasing about 8,200 net mineral acres and $1,595,000 related to delay rental payments. In
second quarter 2008, other lease revenues include $18,546,000 in lease bonus payments as a result
of leasing over 47,000 net mineral acres.
In first six months 2009, other lease revenues include $5,037,000 in lease bonus payments as a
result of leasing nearly 14,300 net mineral acres and $1,917,000 related to delay rental payments.
In first six months 2008, other lease revenues include $20,567,000 in lease bonus payments as a
result of leasing about 52,700 net mineral acres. This leasing activity was located principally in
East Texas and was driven by our proximity to the Cotton Valley, James Lime, Haynesville and
Bossier natural gas formations.
A summary of our oil and gas mineral interests(a) at second quarter-end 2009
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held By |
|
|
State |
|
Unleased(b) |
|
Leased(c) |
|
Production(d) |
|
Total(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Net acres) |
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
244,000 |
|
Louisiana |
|
|
104,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
121,000 |
|
Alabama |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
124,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
622,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes ventures. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes approximately 6,500 net acres subject to lease option. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes leases in primary lease term only. |
|
(d) |
|
Acres being held by production are producing oil or gas in paying quantities. |
|
(e) |
|
Texas and Louisiana net acres are calculated as the gross number of surface
acres multiplied by our percentage ownership of the mineral interest.
Alabama and Georgia net acres are calculated as the gross number of surface
acres multiplied by our estimated percentage ownership of the mineral
interest based on county sampling. |
We also have a 45 percent nonparticipating royalty interest in groundwater produced or
withdrawn for commercial purposes or sold from approximately 1.38 million acres in Texas,
Louisiana, Georgia and Alabama. We have not received any income from this interest.
Fiber Resources
Our fiber resources segment focuses principally on the management of our timber holdings. We
have about 256,000 acres of timber, primarily in Georgia, and about 18,000 acres of timber under
lease. We sell wood fiber from our land and lease land for hunting and other recreational uses.
A summary of our fiber resources results follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
5,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,093 |
|
|
$ |
9,370 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
6 014 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,411 |
|
|
$ |
6,199 |
|
|
$ |
4,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In second quarter 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $272,000 in employee
compensation and benefits, $131,000 in occupancy, $64,000 in contract services and $49,000 in
timber severance taxes. In second quarter 2008, operating expenses principally consist of $316,000
in employee compensation and benefits, $107,000 in occupancy,
$107,000 in timber severance taxes and $100,000 in contract services.
In first six months 2009, operating expenses principally consist of $659,000 in employee
compensation and benefits, $287,000 in occupancy, $211,000 in contract services and $115,000 in
timber severance taxes. In first six months 2008, operating expenses principally consist of
$633,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $202,000 in occupancy, $128,000 in contract
services and $107,000 in timber severance taxes.
In first six months 2008, other operating income principally reflects a gain from partial
termination of a timber lease.
Revenues consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
First Six Months |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber |
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
8,161 |
|
|
$ |
4,666 |
|
Recreational leases and other |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,001 |
|
|
$ |
3,093 |
|
|
$ |
9,370 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Fiber sold consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Pulpwood tons sold |
|
|
244,100 |
|
|
|
218,100 |
|
|
|
450,600 |
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
Average pulpwood price per ton |
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
8.13 |
|
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Sawtimber tons sold |
|
|
136,100 |
|
|
|
44,100 |
|
|
|
226,900 |
|
|
|
79,500 |
|
Average sawtimber price per ton |
|
$ |
18.28 |
|
|
$ |
18.17 |
|
|
$ |
20.10 |
|
|
$ |
18.59 |
|
Total tons sold |
|
|
380,200 |
|
|
|
262,200 |
|
|
|
677,500 |
|
|
|
471,500 |
|
Average price per ton |
|
$ |
11.59 |
|
|
$ |
9.81 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
In second quarter 2009 and first six months 2009, total price per ton increased because we
harvested and sold a higher mix of larger pine sawtimber. The majority of our sales were to
Temple-Inland at market prices.
Items Not Allocated to Segments
Unallocated items represent income and expenses managed on a company-wide basis and include
general and administrative expenses, share-based compensation, gain on sale of assets, interest
expense and other non-operating income and expense.
General and administrative expense principally consists of accounting and finance, tax, legal,
human resources, internal audit, information technology and our Board of Directors. These functions
support all of our business segments and are not allocated.
In second quarter 2009, general and administrative expense principally consists of $1,222,000
in employee compensation and benefits, $449,000 in depreciation expense, $335,000 related to
insurance costs, $286,000 in occupancy, $278,000 in director fees and $268,000 in professional
services. In second quarter 2008, general and administrative expense principally consists of
$1,932,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $572,000 in professional services, $407,000
related to insurance costs, $347,000 in depreciation expense, $273,000 in director fees and
$128,000 in occupancy.
In first six months 2009, general and administrative expense principally consists of
$2,947,000 in employee compensation and benefits, $881,000 in depreciation expense, $651,000
related to insurance costs, $569,000 in occupancy, $542,000 in director fees and $3,630,000 in
professional services of which $3,180,000 was paid to outside advisors regarding an evaluation by
our Board of Directors of an unsolicited shareholder proposal. In first six months 2008, general
and administrative expense principally consists of $3,848,000 in employee compensation and
benefits, $1,253,000 in professional services, $790,000 in insurance related costs, $704,000 in
depreciation expense, $538,000 in director fees and $263,000 in occupancy.
In accordance with our near-term strategic initiatives, in second quarter 2009, we sold about
75,000 acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama for $119,702,000 to Hancock Timber
Resource Group, which acquired the assets on behalf of its investor clients. The transaction
generated net proceeds of $116,116,000, which were principally used to reduce our outstanding debt,
and resulted in a gain on sale of $79,214,000, which was not allocated to segments.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 38% in second quarter 2009 and 37% in first six months 2009 both of
which include less than a 1% benefit attributable to noncontrolling interests. Our effective tax
rate was 32% in second quarter 2008 and 31% in first six months 2008 both of which include about a
2% benefit attributable to noncontrolling interests as well as benefits from percentage depletion
and a federal income tax rate change for qualified timber gains due to the Food, Conservation and
Energy Act of 2008. As a result of our adoption of SFAS No. 160, income before income taxes
includes income from pass-through entities allocable to noncontrolling interests for which there is
no income tax provided.
We anticipate that our effective tax rate in 2009 will be about 37% of which less than 1% will
be attributable to noncontrolling interests.
We have not provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset because we believe it is
likely it will be recoverable in future periods.
In second quarter 2009, we recorded a liability of $5,291,000 related to tax benefits not
recognized for book purposes, which is included in other liabilities.
28
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Sources and Uses of Cash
We operate in cyclical industries and our cash flows fluctuate accordingly. Our principal
operating cash requirements are for the acquisition and development of real estate, either directly
or indirectly through ventures, taxes, interest and compensation. Our principal sources of cash are
proceeds from the sale of real estate and timber, the cash flow from minerals and commercial
operating properties and borrowings. Operating cash flows are affected by the timing of the payment
of real estate development expenditures and the collection of proceeds from the eventual sale of
the real estate, the timing of which can vary substantially depending on many factors including the
size of the project, state and local permitting requirements and availability of utilities. Working
capital is subject to operating needs, the timing of sales of real estate and timber, the timing of
collection of mineral royalties or mineral lease payments, collection of receivables, reimbursement
from utility or improvement districts and the payment of payables and expenses.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from our real estate development activities, undeveloped land sales, timber sales
and mineral and recreational leases are classified as operating cash flows.
In first six months 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $112,437,000 as
proceeds from the sale of about 75,000 acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama to
Hancock Timber Resource Group, on behalf of its investor clients, generated net cash proceeds of
$116,116,000 offset by gain on sale of $79,214,000. Expenditures for real estate development
slightly exceeded non-cash cost of sales due to our development of existing real estate projects,
principally in the major markets of Texas. We invested $6,145,000 in our Cibolo Canyons mixed-use
project near San Antonio, Texas in first six months 2009. In first six months 2008, net cash used
in operating activities was $20,716,000 as expenditures for real estate development and
acquisitions exceeded non-cash cost of sales principally due to our continued development of
existing real estate projects, principally in the major markets of Texas. We invested $14,052,000
in Cibolo Canyons in first six months 2008.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital contributions to and capital distributions from unconsolidated ventures are classified
as investing activities. In addition, proceeds from the sale property, equipment,
software costs and expenditures related to reforestation activities are also classified as
investing activities.
In first six months 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $3,737,000 and is
principally related to investment in property, equipment, software and reforestation. Net cash
returned from our unconsolidated ventures provided $769,000. In first six months 2008, net cash
used in investing activities was $8,332,000 as capital contributions to our unconsolidated ventures
exceeded our capital distributions.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
In first six months 2009, net cash used in financing activities was $99,774,000 as we reduced
our outstanding debt by $99,636,000 principally from the net proceeds generated from the sale of
about 75,000 acres of timber and timberland in Georgia and Alabama in accordance with our near-term
strategic initiatives. In first six months 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was
$29,290,000 as the increase in our debt funded our expenditures for real estate development,
principally in the major markets of Texas.
Liquidity, Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no significant changes in our liquidity, contractual obligations and
off-balance sheet arrangements since year-end 2008 except:
At
second quarter-end 2009, following the amendments described below we
had $220,248,000 in net unused borrowing capacity under our
senior credit facility as compared with $187,933,000 at year-end 2008. The increase in net unused
borrowing capacity is a result of reduction of debt following the sale of assets in accordance with
our near-term strategic initiatives. The net proceeds from the sale were principally used to reduce
our term loan by $39,000,000 and repay our revolving line of credit in the amount of $72,000,000.
29
On
July 16, 2009, we amended our senior credit facility, portions
of which were amended effective June 30, 2009. The principal amendments were to
maintain the interest coverage ratio at 1.50x through December 31, 2009 and, thereafter, adjust to
1.75x; to provide us with the option to extend the maturity date for up to $350,000,000 through
June 30, 2012; to reduce the aggregate commitments by $850 per acre of HBU timberland sold pursuant
to our near-term strategic initiatives, with such reduction being split 60% to reduce the term loan
commitment and 40% to reduce the revolver commitment; to provide that if the interest coverage
ratio is less than 2.0x, we will not be permitted to make any company or asset acquisitions without
prior approval of the administrative agent; to include all our timberland and high value timberland
as collateral and to add a new financial covenant requiring a minimum defined collateral-to-total
commitment ratio of 1.75x; to revise the calculation of the consolidated tangible net worth
covenant to increase the percentage of our cumulative positive net income included in the
calculation from 50% to 75%; to add an additional requirement in the event we desire to pay a
dividend on or repurchase our outstanding shares that we have a minimum pro-forma liquidity of
$125,000,000 immediately after such payment; to revise the minimum liquidity financial covenant to
require a minimum available liquidity at least equal to the lesser of the existing $35,000,000
requirement or 7.5% of the aggregate commitment under the senior credit facility; to establish a
minimum interest rate floor of 2% per annum on non-hedged loans; and to increase the interest
margin added to the LIBOR and base rate loans by 0.5% per annum. We incurred fees of $2,955,000
related to these amendments. Assuming the sale of about 175,000 acres of HBU timberland in accordance with our near-term
strategic initiatives, the total aggregate commitment under our senior credit facility will be
$316,250,000, consisting of $85,750,000 under the term loan and $230,500,000 under the revolving line of credit.
Our senior credit facility and other debt agreements contain terms, conditions and financial
covenants customary for such agreements including minimum levels of interest coverage and
limitations on leverage. At second quarter-end 2009, we were in compliance with the terms,
conditions and financial covenants of these agreements. Based on our current operating projections,
we believe that we will remain in compliance with our senior credit facility covenants in the
future. The following table details our compliance with the financial covenants of these
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Financial Covenant |
|
Requirement |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Interest Coverage Ratio(a) |
|
|
≥ 1.50:1.0 |
|
|
|
5.70:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.68:1.0 |
|
Revenues/Capital Expenditures Ratio(b) |
|
|
≥ 0.80:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.12:1.0 |
|
|
|
1.47:1.0 |
|
Total Leverage Ratio(c) |
|
|
< 40 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
Minimum Liquidity(d) |
|
> $30million |
|
$266 million |
|
$223 million |
Net Worth(e) |
|
> $388 million |
|
$503 million |
|
$447 million |
Collateral Value to Loan Commitment Ratio(f) |
|
|
≥ 1.75:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.19:1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization), plus non-cash compensation
expense, plus other non-cash expenses, divided by interest
expense. This covenant is applied at the end of each
quarter on a rolling four quarter basis. |
|
(b) |
|
Calculated as total gross revenues, plus our pro rata share
of the operating revenues from unconsolidated ventures,
divided by capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are
defined as consolidated development and acquisition
expenditures plus our pro rata share of unconsolidated
ventures development and acquisition expenditures. This
covenant is applied at the end of each quarter on a rolling
four quarter basis. This requirement increases to ≥ 1.0:1.0
after third quarter 2009. |
|
(c) |
|
Calculated as total funded debt divided by adjusted asset
value. Total funded debt includes indebtedness for borrowed
funds, secured liabilities and reimbursement obligations
with respect to letters of credit or similar instruments.
Adjusted asset value is defined as the sum of unrestricted
cash and cash equivalents, timberlands, high value
timberlands, raw entitled lands, entitled land under
development, minerals business, other real estate owned at
book value without regard to any indebtedness and our pro
rata share of joint ventures book value without regard to
any indebtedness. This covenant is applied at the end of
each quarter. |
|
(d) |
|
Calculated as the amount available for drawing under the
revolving commitment, plus unrestricted cash, plus cash
equivalents which are not pledged or encumbered and the use
of which is not restricted by the terms of any agreement.
At second quarter-end 2009, the minimum liquidity is
required to be at least equal to the lesser of $35 million
or 7.5% of the aggregate commitment under the senior credit
facility. At year-end 2008, the requirement was $35
million. This covenant is applied at the end of each
quarter. |
|
(e) |
|
Calculated as the amount by which consolidated total assets
exceeds consolidated total liabilities. At second
quarter-end 2009, the requirement is $388 million, computed
as: $350 million, plus eighty five percent of the aggregate
net proceeds received by us from any equity offering, plus
seventy five percent of all positive net income, on a
cumulative basis. At year-end 2008, the requirement was
$355 million, computed as: $350 million, plus eighty five
percent of the aggregate net proceeds received by us from
any equity offering, plus fifty percent of all positive net
income, on a cumulative basis. This covenant is applied at
the end of each quarter. |
30
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Calculated as the total collateral value of timberland,
high value timberland and our minerals business, divided by
total aggregate loan commitment. This covenant is applied
at the end of each quarter. |
Cibolo Canyons San Antonio, Texas
Mixed-Use Development / Resort Hotel, Spa and Golf
The Cibolo Canyons mixed-use development consists of 2,100 acres planned to include 1,747
residential lots and 145 commercial acres designated for multifamily and retail uses, of which 570
lots and 64 commercial acres have been sold at second quarter-end 2009. We have $65,838,000
invested in the development at second quarter-end 2009.
In 2007, we entered into agreements to facilitate third-party construction and ownership of
the JW Marriott® San Antonio Hill Country Resort & Spa, planned to include a 1,002 room
destination resort and two PGA Tour® Tournament Players Club® golf courses.
Under these agreements, we transferred to the third-party owners about 700 acres of undeveloped
land, and we agreed to provide about $40,500,000. In exchange, the third-party owners assigned to
us certain rights under an Economic Development Agreement, including the right to receive 9% of
hotel occupancy revenues and 1.5% of sales generated within the resort through 2034. At second
quarter-end 2009, we have provided $29,285,000 and expect to fund our remaining commitment of
$11,215,000 by year-end 2009. If the resort hotel is not open and operating on July 1, 2011, the
City of San Antonio could terminate the Special Purpose Improvement District (SPID) and there would
be no source of revenue to fund payments under the Economic Development Agreement. The resort hotel
is under construction and is currently scheduled to open well before July 1, 2011.
Until the SPID achieves an adequate tax base to support issuance of bonds, the proceeds of
which will be used by the SPID to reimburse us for qualified infrastructure costs, we will not
include the estimated reimbursements as a reduction of our real estate cost of sales. At second
quarter-end 2009, we have billed the SPID $49,529,000 for qualified infrastructure costs. These
costs have been audited by the SPID and approved for payment and are included in our investment in
the mixed-use development. The construction and opening of the resort hotel will satisfy a
condition to our right to obtain reimbursement of infrastructure costs related to the mixed-use
development under an Ad Valorem Tax and Non Resort Sales and Use Tax Public Improvement Financing
Agreement between us and the SPID. If the resort hotel is not open and operating on July 1, 2011,
the City of San Antonio could terminate the SPID, and we would have no payor for reimbursement of
qualified infrastructure costs.
In July 2009, we committed to loan up to $10,000,000 in the aggregate to two funds that
are equity investors in the resort hotel project. Any borrowings under these commitments will
bear interest at 9%, increasing to 12% after July 31, 2012, and will be repayable at the earliest of
refinancing or sale of the resort hotel or July 31, 2013. Borrowings, if advanced, will be secured
by pledges of funding commitments from the borrowers, including our right to make capital calls
and to enforce rights under the fund operating agreements in the event of nonpayment.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies or estimates in
first six months 2009 from those disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Standards
Please read Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
Statistical and Other Data
A summary of our real estate projects in the entitlement process(a) at June 30,
2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
Project |
|
County |
|
Market |
|
Acres(b) |
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidden Creek Estates |
|
Los Angeles |
|
Los Angeles |
|
|
700 |
|
Terrace at Hidden Hills |
|
Los Angeles |
|
Los Angeles |
|
|
30 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ball Ground |
|
Cherokee |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
500 |
|
Burt Creek |
|
Dawson |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
970 |
|
Creekview |
|
Troup |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
470 |
|
Crossing |
|
Coweta |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
230 |
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
Project |
|
County |
|
Market |
|
Acres(b) |
Dallas Highway |
|
Haralson |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
1,060 |
|
Fincher Road |
|
Cherokee |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
3,950 |
|
Fox Hall |
|
Coweta |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
960 |
|
Garland Mountain |
|
Cherokee/Bartow |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
350 |
|
Home Place |
|
Coweta |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
1,510 |
|
Hutchinson Mill |
|
Troup |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
880 |
|
Jackson Park |
|
Jackson |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
700 |
|
Martins Bridge |
|
Banks |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
970 |
|
Mill Creek |
|
Coweta |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
770 |
|
Serenity |
|
Carroll |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
440 |
|
Three Creeks |
|
Troup |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
740 |
|
Waleska |
|
Cherokee |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
150 |
|
Wolf Creek |
|
Carroll/Douglas |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
12,230 |
|
Yellow Creek |
|
Cherokee |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
1,060 |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Houston |
|
Harris/Liberty |
|
Houston |
|
|
3,700 |
|
San Jacinto |
|
Montgomery |
|
Houston |
|
|
150 |
|
Entrada(c) |
|
Travis |
|
Austin |
|
|
240 |
|
Woodlake Village(c) |
|
Montgomery |
|
Houston |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A project is deemed to be in the entitlement process when
customary steps necessary for the preparation and submittal
of an application, like conducting pre-application meetings
or similar discussions with governmental officials, have
commenced or an application has been filed. Projects listed
may have significant steps remaining, and there is no
assurance that entitlements ultimately will be received. |
|
(b) |
|
Project acres, which are the total for the project
regardless of our ownership interest, are approximate. The
actual number of acres entitled may vary. |
|
(c) |
|
We own a 50 percent interest in these projects. |
A summary of activity within our projects in the development process, which includes
entitled(a), developed and under development real estate projects, at June 30, 2009
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Lots(c) |
|
Commercial Acres(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
Acres Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Since |
|
Lots |
|
Since |
|
Acres |
Project |
|
County |
|
Market |
|
Owned(b) |
|
Inception |
|
Remaining |
|
Inception |
|
Remaining |
Projects we own |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Joaquin River |
|
Contra Costa/ Sacramento |
|
Oakland |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo Highlands |
|
Weld |
|
Denver |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnstown Farms |
|
Weld |
|
Denver |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Pinery West |
|
Douglas |
|
Denver |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
Stonebraker |
|
Weld |
|
Denver |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Westlake Highlands |
|
Jefferson |
|
Denver |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrowhead Ranch |
|
Hays |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Caruth Lakes |
|
Rockwall |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cibolo Canyons |
|
Bexar |
|
San Antonio |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Harbor Lakes |
|
Hood |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Harbor Mist |
|
Calhoun |
|
Corpus Christi |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hunters Crossing |
|
Bastrop |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
La Conterra |
|
Williamson |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Maxwell Creek |
|
Collin |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Oak Creek Estates |
|
Comal |
|
San Antonio |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Colony |
|
Bastrop |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
The Gables at North Hill |
|
Collin |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Preserve at Pecan Creek |
|
Denton |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
The Ridge at Ribelin Ranch |
|
Travis |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Lots(c) |
|
Commercial Acres(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
Acres Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Since |
|
Lots |
|
Since |
|
Acres |
Project |
|
County |
|
Market |
|
Owned(b) |
|
Inception |
|
Remaining |
|
Inception |
|
Remaining |
Westside at Buttercup Creek |
|
Williamson |
|
Austin |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other projects (7) |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towne West |
|
Bartow |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Other projects (14) |
|
Various |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705 |
|
Missouri and Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other projects (2) |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
14,442 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects in entities we consolidate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City Park |
|
Harris |
|
Houston |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Lantana |
|
Denton |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
55 |
%(e) |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light Farms |
|
Collin |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stoney Creek |
|
Dallas |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timber Creek |
|
Collin |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other projects (5) |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total owned and consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
20,582 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects in ventures that we
account for using the equity
method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Hills |
|
Paulding |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Georgian |
|
Paulding |
|
Atlanta |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other projects (5) |
|
Various |
|
Atlanta |
|
Various |
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bar C Ranch |
|
Tarrant |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannin Farms West |
|
Tarrant |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Lantana |
|
Denton |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
Various(e) |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Long Meadow Farms |
|
Fort Bend |
|
Houston |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Southern Trails |
|
Brazoria |
|
Houston |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stonewall Estates |
|
Bexar |
|
San Antonio |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer Creek Ranch |
|
Tarrant |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
Summer Lakes |
|
Fort Bend |
|
Houston |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Village Park |
|
Collin |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Waterford Park |
|
Fort Bend |
|
Houston |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other projects (2) |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
Various |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other projects (3) |
|
Various |
|
Tampa |
|
Various |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total in ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
9,203 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,796 |
|
|
|
29,785 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A project is deemed entitled when all major discretionary land-use
approvals have been received. Some projects may require additional
permits for development. |
|
(b) |
|
Interest owned reflects our net equity interest in the project,
whether owned directly or indirectly. There are some projects that
have multiple ownership structures within them. Accordingly,
portions of these projects may appear as owned, consolidated and/or
accounted for using the equity method. |
|
(c) |
|
Lots are for the total project, regardless of our ownership interest. |
|
(d) |
|
Commercial acres are for the total project, regardless of our
ownership interest, and are net developable acres, which may be
fewer than the gross acres available in the project. |
|
(e) |
|
The Lantana project consists of a series of 15 partnerships in which
our voting interests range from 25 percent to 55 percent. We account
for three of these partnerships using the equity method and we
consolidate the remaining partnerships. |
33
A summary of our commercial operating properties, commercial projects and condominium projects
at June 30, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
Project |
|
County |
|
Market |
|
Owned(a) |
|
Type |
|
Description |
Radisson Hotel
|
|
Travis
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Hotel
|
|
413 guest rooms and suites |
Palisades West
|
|
Travis
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
Office
|
|
375,000 square feet |
Presidio at Judges Hill
|
|
Travis
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
Condominium
|
|
45 units |
Las Brisas
|
|
Williamson
|
|
Austin
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
Multi-Family
|
|
414 unit luxury apartment |
Harbor Lakes Golf Club
|
|
Hood
|
|
Dallas/Fort Worth
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Golf Club
|
|
18 hole golf course and club |
Gulf Coast Apartments
|
|
Various
|
|
Various
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Multi-Family
|
|
9 apartment communities |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Interest owned reflects our net equity interest in the project, whether owned directly or indirectly. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk is principally related to our variable-rate debt. Interest rate changes
impact earnings due to the resulting increase or decrease in the cost of our variable-rate debt,
which was $119,911,000 at second quarter-end 2009 and $229,030,000 at year-end 2008.
The following table illustrates the estimated effect on our pre-tax income of immediate,
parallel and sustained shifts in interest rates for the next 12 months at second quarter-end 2009,
with comparative year-end 2008 information. This estimate assumes that debt reductions from
contractual payments will be replaced with short-term, variable-rate debt; however, that may not be
the financing alternative we would choose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
Change in Interest Rates |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
+2% |
|
$ |
(2,398 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,581 |
) |
+1% |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
(2,290 |
) |
-1% |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
-2% |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
4,581 |
|
Changes in interest rates affect the value of our interest rate swap agreement ($100,000,000
notional amount at second quarter-end 2009). We believe any change in the value of this agreement
would not be significant.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have no exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.
Commodity Price Risk
We have no significant exposure to commodity price fluctuations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or
the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such
period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing
and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
34
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term
is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by
this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved directly or through ventures in various legal proceedings that arise from time
to time in the ordinary course of doing business. We believe we have established adequate reserves
for any probable losses and that the outcome of any of the proceedings should not have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations or cash flows. It is
possible, however, that circumstances beyond our control or significant subsequent developments
could result in additional charges related to these matters that could be significant to results of
operations or cash flow in any single accounting period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In second quarter 2009, a total of 1,215 restricted shares of our common stock were withheld
(all in May 2009) to pay taxes due in connection with vesting of restricted stock awards. The terms
of the awards provide that the value of the restricted shares withheld will be based on the closing
price per share of our common stock on the vesting date, as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange. The price was $12.06.
On February 11, 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, to be funded principally from the sale of approximately
175,000 acres of HBU timberland. We have not purchased any shares under this authorization, which
has no expiration date, and no repurchases will be made under this repurchase authorization until
after completion of the asset sales. We have no repurchase plans or programs that expired during
second quarter 2009 and no repurchase plans or programs that we intend to terminate prior to
expiration or under which we no longer intend to make further purchases.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders on May 12, 2009, at which a quorum was
present. The table below sets forth the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as
the number of abstentions and broker non-votes for each matter voted upon at that meeting, as
certified by the independent inspector of elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Against or |
|
and Broker |
Matter |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Non-Votes |
1. Election of three directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis R. Brill |
|
|
29,584,644 |
|
|
|
3,065,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Currie |
|
|
26,860,785 |
|
|
|
5,789,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Rubright |
|
|
26,914,421 |
|
|
|
5,735,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP |
|
|
32,442,585 |
|
|
|
165,082 |
|
|
|
42,480 |
|
3. Amendment of 2007 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
16,165,292 |
|
|
|
13,027,965 |
|
|
|
3,456,890 |
|
35
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2009, by and
between Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc. and Hancock
Natural Resource Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
First Amendment to the Forestar Real Estate Group Inc. 2007
Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2009, by and
between Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc. and Holland M.
Ware. |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
First Amendment to the Revolving and Term Credit Agreement and
Other Loan Documents, dated as of March 12, 2008, by and among
the Company, Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries signatory thereto, Key Bank National
Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party
thereto. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Second Amendment to Revolving and Term Credit Agreement, dated
as of July 16, 2009, by and among the Company, Forestar (USA)
Real Estate Group Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
signatory thereto, Key Bank National Association, as
administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 17, 2009). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
|
|
Date: August 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Christopher L. Nines
|
|
|
|
Christopher L. Nines |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Charles D. Jehl
|
|
|
|
Charles D. Jehl |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
37