e10vk
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
Commission File No. 0-21625
FAMOUS DAVES of AMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
41-1782300
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 200
Minnetonka, MN 55343
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (952) 294-1300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2006
(the last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second quarter), based upon the
last sale price of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market SM on June
30, 2006, was $ 132,998,697. As of March 9, 2007, 10,138,789 shares of the Registrants Common
Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of our definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May
8, 2007 (the 2007 Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K,
to the extent described in Part III. The 2007 Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Development of Business
Famous Daves of America, Inc. (Famous Daves or the Company) was incorporated as a
Minnesota corporation in March 1994 and opened its first restaurant in Minneapolis, Minnesota in
June 1995. As of December 31, 2006, there were 145 Famous Daves restaurants operating in 35 states,
including 41 company-owned restaurants and 104 franchise-operated restaurants. An additional 162
franchise restaurants were committed to be developed through signed area development agreements at
December 31, 2006.
Financial Information about Segments
Since our inception, our revenue, operating income (losses) and assets have been attributable
to the single industry segment of the foodservice industry. Our revenue and operating income for
each of the last three fiscal years, and our assets for each of the last two fiscal years, are set
forth elsewhere in this Form 10-K under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Narrative Description of Business
Famous Daves restaurants, a majority of which offer full table service, feature
hickory-smoked off-the-grill meat entrée favorites. We seek to differentiate ourselves by
providing high-quality food in distinctive and comfortable environments with signature signage. As
of December 31, 2006, 35 of our company-owned restaurants were full-service and 6 were
counter-service. In 2007, we plan to open up to five company-owned restaurants featuring our
Smokehouse design elements which include the following: a designated bar, a signature exterior
smokestack, a separate entrance for our category-leading TO GO business and a patio (where
available). This design enables us to capitalize on a consistent and readily identifiable look and
feel for our future locations. Our newest restaurants opened in fiscal 2006 have approximately
6,000 square feet, and approximately 175 seats with 50 seats in the bar and 32 additional seats on
the patio.
We pride ourselves on the following:
High Quality Food Each restaurant features a distinctive selection of authentic
hickory-smoked off-the-grill barbecue favorites, such as flame-grilled St. Louis-style and baby
back ribs, Texas beef brisket, Georgia chopped pork, country-roasted chicken, and generous
signature sandwiches and salads. Enticing side items, such as honey-buttered corn bread, potato
salad, coleslaw, Shack Fries and Wilbur Beans, accompany the broad entrée selection. Homemade
desserts, including Famous Daves Bread Pudding, Hot Fudge Kahlua Brownies, and recently added Key
Lime Pie, are a specialty. To complement our smoked meat entrée and appetizer items and to suit
different customer tastes, we offer five regional tableside barbeque sauces: Rich & Sassy®, Texas
Pit, Georgia Mustard, Devils Spit® and Sweet and Zesty. These sauces, in addition to a variety
of seasonings, rubs, marinades, and other items are also distributed in retail grocery stores
throughout the country under licensing agreements.
We believe that high quality food, scratch cooking and smoking our meats daily at each of
our restaurants are principal points of differentiation between us and other casual dining
competitors and are a significant contributing factor to repeat business. We also feel that our
focus on barbecue and being True to the Que allows for product innovation without diluting our
brand. As such, we see no
3
geographic impediments to scaling our concept and brand. Our off-premise
sales are the highest in the industry with a separate TO GO entrance at many of our restaurants
with prominent and distinct signage, and for added convenience, we separately staff the TO GO
counter.
Distinctive Environment Décor and Music Our original décor theme was a nostalgic roadhouse
shack (Shack), as defined by the abundant use of rustic antiques and items of Americana. In late
1997, we introduced the Lodge format which featured décor reminiscent of a comfortable
Northwoods hunting lodge with a full-service dining room and bar. In addition, we developed a
larger Blues Club format that featured authentic Chicago Blues Club décor and live music seven
nights a week. We have now evolved our format to that of a full-service Smokehouse concept.
This design incorporates the best attributes of the past restaurants while providing a consistent
brand image. Of our 41 restaurants as of December 31, 2006, 35 were full-service restaurants with
24 having the Lodge format, 6 having the Shack format, and one, located in the Minneapolis
market, was a Blues Club format. Three new company-owned restaurants were opened in fiscal 2006.
With the fiscal 2005 conversion of our Maple Grove, Minnesota restaurant from a counter-service, to
a full-service restaurant, we incorporated many of the smokehouse concept elements. We now have a
total of four Smokehouse restaurants with the smokehouse concept. We also have five
counter-service restaurants with the Shack format. We will continue to evaluate converting other
counter-service restaurants to full-service restaurants where there is determined to be a
sufficient return on our investment.
Broad-Based Appeal We believe that our concept has broad appeal because it attracts
customers of all ages, the menu offers a variety of items, and our distinctive sauces allow our
guests to customize their experience, appealing to many tastes. We believe that our distinctive
barbecue concept, combined with our high-quality food, make Famous Daves appealing to families,
children, teenagers and adults of all ages and socio-economic backgrounds.
Operating Strategy
Our journey to achieving sustainable profitable growth requires us to deliver high-quality
experiences in terms of both food and hospitality to every guest, every day, and to enhance brand
awareness in our markets. Key elements of our strategy include the following:
Operational Excellence During fiscal 2006, we continued our intense focus on operational
excellence and integrity, and on creating a consistently great guest experience, both in terms of
food and hospitality, across our system. We define operational excellence as an uncompromising
attention to the details of our recipes, preparation and cooking procedures, handling procedures,
rotation, sanitation, cleanliness and safety. It also means an unyielding commitment to our guests
to provide a Famous experience with every visit through the execution of precision service. In
our restaurants, we strive to emphasize value and speed of service by employing a streamlined
operating system based on a focused menu and simplified food preparation techniques.
Our menu focuses on a number of popular smoked, barbeque, meat, entrée items and delicious
side dishes which are prepared using easy-to-operate kitchen equipment and processes that use
prepared proprietary seasonings, sauces and mixes. This streamlined food preparation system helps
lower the cost of operation by requiring fewer staff, lower training costs, and eliminates the need
for highly compensated chefs. In 2004, in order to enhance our appeal, expand our audience, and
promote our
cravable products without discounting, we began to introduce Limited-Time Offerings (LTOs)
which often provide higher margins than our regular menu items. We believe that constant and
exciting new product introductions, offered for a limited period of time, encourage trial visits,
build repeat traffic and increase exposure to our regular menu. In order to increase customer
frequency, we have assembled a research and development product pipeline designed to generate four
to six product introductions annually.
4
The first quarter of fiscal 2006 included a successful Spring promotion with our LTO of a
Blackened Catfish Dinner, a Corn Dusted Catfish Sandwich, a Crawfish and Cajun Fries Appetizer, and
Daves Sassy Crawfish BBQ Salad. Our summer promotion in June, July and August featured
combinations of our St. Louis-style ribs and baby back ribs, in addition to a phenomenal key lime
pie. Our Fall Porktoberfest Promotion consisted of a pork loin entrée, pork sandwich, and a combo.
The Rum Yummy Pork Loin featured two thick slices of hickory-smoked pork loin, topped with a
spicy-sweet glaze made from Captain Morgan ® Original Spiced Rum and Granny Smith apples. The
sandwich offering, the Pig Dipper, consisted of a thinly sliced hickory-smoked pork loin, topped
with jalapeno bacon, and cheddar cheese, piled on a toasted ciabatta bread, served with Daves own
tangy Georgia Mustard ® au jus. The pork combo offering consisted of a thick slice of tender
char-grilled pork loin slathered in Rich and Sassy ® BBQ sauce, complimented with 4 award-winning
St. Louis-style spareribs.
The 2007 Seafood promotion is a 9-week program that started in early February and ends in
early April. This promotion features St. Louis-style sparerib and fish combinations, featuring
either beer-battered cod or sweet and sassy grilled salmon, a beer-battered cod sandwich and
platter, as well as existing menu items: a catfish fingers appetizer and sweet and sassy salmon
platter.
Human Resources and Training Our Human Resource and Training Departments are committed to
improving performance in our restaurants while making Famous Daves the absolute best place to
work. Our metrics and overall effectiveness show that we are quickly becoming one of the best
employers.
In fiscal 2006 we implemented a recruiting and staffing software solution. This system has
helped increase efficiencies in our restaurants and Support Center. The solution includes an
on-line application and assessment designed to hire top talent and the best candidates for each
position. It also is integrated into our payroll system and saves Managers time filling out
paperwork and increases the accuracy of new hire payroll documents.
We are a performance-based organization committed to recognizing and rewarding performance at
all levels of the organization. Our compensation is very much viewed as part of a total rewards
program, and is benchmarked closely against the industry. Our total rewards program includes
health and welfare coverage, 401(k) and non-qualified deferred compensation plans offering a
company match, and base pay and incentive programs developed to maintain our competitive position.
We are pleased with our progress in retention as Management and hourly Associate turnover has been
maintained at or below industry averages. Our Management turnover for fiscal 2006 was 26% and
Associate turnover was 86%.
In the Training and Development arena, a number of successful training courses were conducted
for both restaurant Manager and Multi-Unit Manager levels to create defined career paths. Training
courses are offered to both corporate Management and Franchise Partners. During fiscal 2006, our
classes focused on core competencies and opportunities for success. The curriculum included food
safety and alcohol awareness; food execution and quality; human resource skills and restaurant
supervision.
Our leadership development program, entitled Good to Great, was instrumental in assessing
and training our high potential leaders at all levels of the organization. This process includes
strength coaching, people, sales and profit presentations, financial education, and networking
opportunities with the Executive Team. Our General Manager Workshop in 2006 was focused on
execution of the basics of restaurant Management and how to effectively manage Generation Y.
Participants included all company-owned restaurant General Managers and Area Directors along with
most of our franchise-operated restaurant General Managers and Multi-Unit Operators. In addition to
developing leaders in our restaurants, we provide individualized training and strength coaching
opportunities to all our Support Center Associates.
5
Our Presidents Club program rewards General Managers for accomplishments in many areas
directly related to great restaurant operations, such as sales growth, operating results, safety
programs, internal promotions, retention and increased Guest satisfaction scores. During fiscal
2006, over half of our General Managers successfully attained the Presidents Club designation.
During fiscal 2006 we implemented our Smokin Superstar program to recognize contributions towards
the operational success of the organization. Two Support Center Associates were recognized by both
the Company and franchise operations team for their outstanding service and support.
During fiscal 2007, Human Resources and Training will focus on the selection and retention of
superior talent through our programs in succession planning, talent management, safety and risk
reduction, organizational development and training.
Restaurant Operations
Our ability to manage multiple restaurants in geographically diverse locations is central to
our overall success. In each market, we place specific emphasis on the positions of Area Director
and General Manager, and seek talented individuals that bring a diverse set of skills, knowledge,
and experience to the Company. We strive to maintain quality and consistency in each of our
restaurants through the careful training and supervision of Associates and the establishment of,
and adherence to, high standards relating to performance, food and beverage preparation, and
maintenance of facilities.
All General Managers must complete a seven-week training program, during which they are
instructed in areas such as food quality and preparation, customer service, hospitality, and
Associate relations. We have prepared operations manuals relating to food and beverage quality and
service standards. New Associates participate in training under the close supervision of our
management. Each General Manager reports up through an Area Director, who manages from four to nine
restaurants, depending on the region. Our Area Directors have all been successful General
Managers, either for Famous Daves or for other restaurants, and are responsible for ensuring that
operational standards are consistently applied in our restaurants, communication of company focus
and priorities, and supporting the development of restaurant management teams. In addition to the
training that the General Managers are required to complete, as noted above, our Area Directors
receive additional training through Area Director workshops that focus specifically on managing
multiple locations, planning, time management, staff and management development skills.
During fiscal 2006, we introduced the Director of Operations position, which allows us to have
our operations leadership closer to the day-in and day-out business of our restaurants, thus
creating a smaller span of control for each Director of Operations, and allowing them to apply a
much sharper focus to their restaurants operations. We currently have two Directors of Operations.
The Directors of Operations assist in the professional development of our Area Directors and
General Mangers as we prepare for future company-owned growth. They are also instrumental in
driving our vision of operational integrity and contributing to the improvement of results achieved
at our restaurants, including building sales, developing people and growing profits.
We strive to instill enthusiasm and dedication in our Associates and regularly solicit
suggestions concerning our operations and endeavors in order to be responsive to their concerns.
In addition, we have numerous programs designed to recognize and reward them for outstanding
performance. Staffing levels at each restaurant vary according to the time of day and size of the
restaurant. However, in general, each restaurant has approximately 40 to 60 Associates.
6
Off-Premise Occasions Focus on Convenience In addition to our lively and entertaining
sit-down experience, we provide our guests with maximum convenience by offering expedient take-out
service and catering. We believe that Famous Daves entrées and side dishes are viewed by guests as
traditional American picnic foods that maintain their quality and travel particularly well,
making them an attractive choice to replace a home-cooked meal. Also, the high quality, reasonable
cost and avoidance of preparation time make take-out of our product particularly attractive.
During fiscal 2006, we saw continued success in our industry-leading off-premise sales.
Approximately 33% of our restaurant sales in fiscal 2006, were derived from catering and TO GO,
providing us with revenue opportunities beyond our in-house seating capacity and we continue to
seek ways to leverage these segments of our business. Our restaurants have been designed
specifically to accommodate a significant level of TO GO sales, including a separate TO GO
entrance with prominent and distinct signage and for added convenience; we separately staff the TO
GO counter.
Catering continues to grow as more consumers and local businesses become aware of the
portability of our product. In addition, each restaurant has a dedicated vehicle to fully support
our catering initiatives. The demand for Famous Daves catering, which accounted for approximately
10% of our sales for fiscal 2006, continues to increase, as consumers learn just how distinctive,
flavorful and easy an event can be when they let Famous Daves bring the food. We see catering as
an opportunity for new consumers to sample our product who would not otherwise have had the
opportunity to visit our restaurants.
TO GO, which accounted for approximately 23% of our restaurant sales for fiscal 2006, also
continues to grow as an integral part of our overall business plan, and our new Smokehouse
restaurants have a separate entrance for TO GO customers convenience. This option enables Famous
Daves to capture a greater portion of the growing convenience and flexibility of the take-out
market and allows consumers to trade within our brand, when dining in isnt always an option.
Our efforts are featured in all company-owned and franchise-operated restaurants and feature
signage and merchandising both inside and outside the restaurants. From the time a guest drives
into the parking lot to the time they leave the restaurant, they will be reminded of Famous Daves
excellence in delivering the best barbeque TO GO.
Customer Satisfaction We believe that we achieve a significant level of repeat business by
providing high-quality food, efficient friendly service, and warm caring hospitality in an
entertaining environment at moderate prices. We strive to maintain quality and consistency in each
of our restaurants through the purposeful hiring, training and supervision of personnel and the
establishment of, and adherence to, high standards of personnel performance, food preparation and
facility maintenance. We have also built family-friendly strategies into each restaurants food,
service and design by providing childrens menus, smaller-sized entrees at reduced prices and
changing tables in restrooms. We diligently monitor the guest experience through the use of
mystery shopper programs and an interactive voice response (IVR) guest feedback system to ensure
that our system is producing desired results. During 2006, we saw continued improvement in guest
satisfaction scores through these monitoring programs.
Value Proposition and Guest Frequency We offer high quality food and a distinctive
atmosphere at competitive prices to encourage frequent patronage. Lunch and dinner entrees range
from $6.00 to $21.00 resulting in a per person average of $13.28 during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006. Lunch checks averaged $11.62 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 and dinner
checks averaged $14.48 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. We believe that constant and
exciting new product introductions, offered for a limited period of time, will help drive new, as
well as infrequent guests into our restaurants for additional meal occasions. We have a
fully-equipped test kitchen at our corporate headquarters. This facility allows us to create new
menu selections, prepare and test LTOs and further refine our recipe books and preparation
techniques.
7
Marketing and Promotion
Famous Daves is the category-defining brand in barbecue. Specializing in a unique and
distinctive brand of grilled, smoked, and southern style food, our menu specialty helps set the
brand apart from the rest of the crowded field in casual dining. During fiscal 2007, we will
continue to leverage our brand position. We have a system-wide public relations and marketing
fund. All company-owned, and those franchise-operated restaurants with agreements signed after
December 17, 2003, are required to contribute 1.0% of sales to this fund. We also use payments
received from certain vendors in the form of rebates as additional funding. During fiscal 2007, we
expect to spend approximately 3.5% of net restaurant sales on marketing and advertising, with 1.0%
of net restaurant sales dedicated to the development of advertising
and promotional materials and programs designed to create brand awareness in the markets
within which we operate. BBDO of Minneapolis is our advertising agency of record, and they help
drive the concept forward and create a distinctive positioning and consistent creative voice for
the brand. In coordination with our marketing department, BBDO is responsible for the advertising,
promotion, creative development, branding and media-buying for Famous Daves. In addition to the
traditional marketing and publicity methods embraced in the past, Famous Daves used local outreach
marketing efforts as appropriate in 2006, including television, cable, radio, and outdoor
billboards.
We are also creating awareness for the Famous Daves brand through product and brand licensing
arrangements that extend our barbeque sauces, seasonings, rubs, marinades and other items in retail
outlets across the United States. This retail distribution allows consumers to enrich their
at-home barbeque experiences with Famous Daves bold and zesty flavors.
Advertising isnt the only vehicle we use to build awareness of the Famous Daves brand. In
2006, our Rib Team competed in scores of events and festivals nationwide. This team travels the
country, participating in contests and festivals to introduce people to our brand of barbeque and
build brand awareness in a segment largely defined by independents. Our Rib Teams most notable
award in 2006 was the Critics Choice Award at the Best of the West barbeque festival in Reno,
Nevada, an invitation-only competition that we attended for the second time. Other best ribs awards
included, the Great American Rib Cook-Off in Cleveland, Ohio, and the Pig Gig in Jupiter, Florida.
We have also received various concept awards of which we are very proud, including Restaurants &
Institutions Consumers Choice in Chains Gold Award. Since inception, we have received over 200
awards. We have received a ranking of 162 out of 200 of the Top Franchises in Franchise Times.
The strategic focus in 2007 for marketing and promotion remains the same to be the
segment-defining brand in BBQ, create more competitive distinction, and continue to strengthen the
perception of value in the consumers mind.
Growth Strategy
We believe that the barbeque segment of the casual dining niche of the restaurant industry
offers strong growth opportunities, and we see no impediments to our growth on a geographical
basis. Our geographical concentration as of December 31, 2006 was 52% Midwest, 21% South, 15% West
and 12% Northeast. We are in 35 states with our concept. During fiscal 2007, we plan to open up to
5 company-owned restaurants and up to 20 to 25 franchise-operated restaurants. The key elements of
our long-term growth strategy include the following:
8
Company-Owned Restaurant Expansion We intend to build in our existing markets in high
profile, heavy traffic retail locations in order to continue to build brand awareness. Our plan is
focused on sustainable, controlled growth, primarily in markets where multiple restaurants can be
opened, thereby expanding consumer awareness, and creating opportunities for operating,
distribution, and marketing efficiencies.
We have implemented a real estate site selection model to assess the quality and sales
potential of new locations. This process involved extensive consumer research in our existing
restaurants which resulted in a guest profile, which is updated on an annual basis. Each location
is evaluated based on three primary sales drivers, which include the sales potential from the
residential base (home quality), employment base (work quality), and retail activity (retail
quality). Locations are also evaluated on their site characteristics which include seven
categories of key site attributes, including but not limited to, access, visibility, and parking.
Development of company-owned markets is a very strategic process. An overall market
development strategy is prepared for each market. The creation of this market strategy starts with
identifying trade areas that align demographically with the guest profile. The trade areas are
then assessed for viability and vitality and prioritized as initial, second tier, or future
development. Since markets are dynamic, the market strategy includes a continual and ongoing
assessment of all existing restaurant locations. If financially feasible, a restaurant may be
relocated as the retail or residential focus of a trade area shifts.
As previously mentioned, we have created a prototype design, called our Smokehouse concept,
and we will be using this design for all future restaurants to streamline the development and
expansion process. We intend to finance development through the use of cash on hand, cash flow
generated from operations, and through availability on our $20.0 million revolving line of credit.
Franchise-Operated Restaurant Expansion As of December 31, 2006, we had 162 signed franchise
area development commitments that are expected to open over the next seven years. We continue to
expand our franchisee network throughout the United States. Generally, we find franchise
candidates with prior franchise casual-dining restaurant experience in the markets for which they
will be granted. The area development agreements generally range from 5 to 15 restaurants.
Purchasing
We strive to obtain consistent quality items at competitive prices from reliable sources. In
order to maximize operational efficiencies and to provide the freshest ingredients for our food
products, each restaurants management team determines the daily quantities of food items needed
and orders such quantities to be delivered to their restaurant. The products, produced by major
manufacturers designated by us, are shipped directly to the restaurants through foodservice
distributors.
Contract pricing accounts for approximately 86% of all of our total purchases. Contracts for
various items are negotiated throughout the year and typically fix prices for twelve months. On
occasion, we will enter into a short-term contract in times when it is anticipated that near-term
prices could substantially decrease. For fiscal 2007, our poultry and pork contracts are annual
contracts, while our brisket contract is from January-May. Of our total purchases, pork is
approximately 32%, poultry is approximately 10%, and beef, including hamburger and brisket, is
approximately 10%. Our pork contract renewal in October 2006 resulted in a 2.65% price decrease
for 2007. Poultry prices negotiated in January 2007, resulted in a
price increase of approximately 4%. Our brisket contract resulted in a 6% price increase for
the January-May 2007 timeframe as compared to fiscal 2006. We have transitioned to a non-trans-fat
oil product which resulted in a 1.7% price decrease over fiscal 2006 contract oil prices. As a
result of these newly renewed contracts, we anticipate that food costs, as a percent of net
restaurant sales, will remain flat for fiscal 2007 over the prior year.
9
We believe we have opportunities to offset increases, if any, in commodity pricing through
menu engineering such as the use of our LTOs, which typically carry more margin than many of our
core product offerings. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate taking price increases at least
annually.
In fiscal 2006, our adult beverage sales as a percentage of dine-in sales were approximately
10%, essentially flat to fiscal 2005. We have determined that we have limited ability to grow the
bar in the majority of our existing restaurants due to the fact that these restaurants have little
to no designated bar, and some only serve beer and wine. Recent openings in fiscal 2006 of
company-owned restaurants with a designated bar are averaging slightly higher adult beverage sales
than our overall Company average.
Our food manufacturers produce our products and our distributors warehouse and ship our
products. Our primary broad line distributor accounts for approximately 85% of our total
purchases. We believe that our relationships with our food manufacturers and distributors are
excellent, and anticipate no interruption in the supply of product delivered by any of these
companies. In the case of a potential supply disruption, however, we have focused on identifying
alternative supplies and methods to ensure that there is no disruption of product flow. We believe
we could obtain competitive products and prices on short notice from a number of alternative
suppliers.
Management Information Systems
We believe that strong information systems are essential to our current operations and are
critical towards enhancing our competitive position in our industry. We have invested
significantly in building these capabilities.
We have systems in place at the unit level for point-of-sale (POS), Associate screening and
hiring, labor scheduling, and inventory management providing management with revenue and other key
operating and financial information. These restaurant-level systems facilitate the movement of
customer orders between the customer areas and kitchen operations, process credit and gift card
transactions providing reporting that allows us to track the average guest check daily, by
restaurant, by server, and by day part. They also track the time worked by each Associate,
allowing management to more effectively manage labor costs through better determination of staffing
needs and scheduling of Associate work hours.
Our unit-level POS, time management and inventory management systems provide data for posting
to our general ledger and to other accounting subsystems. Such reporting includes: (i) daily
reports of revenue and labor, (ii) weekly reports of selected controllable restaurant expenses, and
(iii) detailed monthly reports of revenue and expenses.
In addition, many of our systems at the unit-level have an enterprise component that allows
for integrated management and reporting at both the unit and enterprise levels. The
enterprise-level systems include menu management providing us with centralized control and ease of
deployment for restaurant menu management such as menu changes, tax structure and price changes.
We continue to develop and implement new enhancements to our systems. In fiscal 2006, we
implemented the first phase of a new labor-scheduling system and are in the midst of implementing a
back-of-the-house management system to prepare for our next stage of growth. This entire
project will take 18-24 months to fully implement, and is expected to cost approximately $2.0
million. This is a key restaurant management solution that will provide additional functionality
to our restaurants, streamline our operations, improve management information, enhance our
enterprise-level reporting, and reduce labor and operating expenses.
10
Projects slated in fiscal 2007 include upgrades to our network and telecommunications
infrastructure, providing additional redundancy at the restaurant and enterprise level,
implementation of the back-of-the-house management system mentioned above, providing streamlined
inventory and enhanced food cost management capabilities; implementation of a time and attendance
system integrating our hiring, labor scheduling, POS, and payroll tools providing a more
streamlined Associate on-boarding and management process. In addition, we will upgrade our POS
system to the next generation of software and hardware giving us additional capabilities along with
enhanced fail-over and redundancy.
Trademarks
Our Company has registered various trademarks and makes use of various unregistered marks, and
intends to vigorously defend these marks. Famous Daves and the Famous Daves logo are
registered trademarks of Famous Daves of America, Inc. There can be no assurance, however, that
we will be granted trademark registration for any new applications or for any or all of the
proposed uses in our applications. In the event we are granted registration for additional marks,
there can be no assurance that we can protect such marks and designs against prior users in areas
where we conduct operations. There is also no assurance that we will be able to prevent competitors
from using the same or similar marks, concepts or appearance. Nevertheless, the Company highly
values its trademarks, trade names and service marks and will defend against any improper use of
its marks to the fullest extent allowable by law.
Franchise Program
We have offered franchises of our concept since July 1998 and currently file our franchise
circular in all 50 states. Our growth and success depends in part upon our ability to attract,
contract with and retain qualified franchisees. It also depends upon the ability of those
franchisees to successfully operate their restaurants with our standards of quality and promote and
develop Famous Daves brand awareness.
Although we have established criteria to evaluate prospective franchisees, and our franchise
agreements include certain operating standards, each franchisee operates his/her restaurants
independently. Various laws limit our ability to influence the day-to-day operation of our
franchise restaurants. We cannot assure you that franchisees will be able to successfully operate
Famous Daves restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards for operational excellence,
service and food quality.
11
At December 31, 2006, we had 36 franchise partners operating 104 Famous Daves franchise
restaurants. Signed area development agreements, representing commitments to open an additional
162 franchise restaurants, were in place as of December 31, 2006. There can be no assurance that
these franchisees will fulfill their commitments or fulfill them within the anticipated timeframe.
We continue to grow the franchise program for our restaurants and anticipate up to 20 to 25
additional franchise restaurants will open during fiscal 2007.
As of December 31, 2006, we had franchise-operated restaurants in the following locations:
|
|
|
State |
|
Number of Franchise-Operated Restaurants |
Arizona |
|
4 |
California |
|
5 |
Colorado |
|
2 |
Connecticut |
|
1 |
Florida |
|
2 |
Georgia |
|
4 |
Illinois |
|
3 |
Indiana |
|
2 |
Iowa |
|
3 |
Kansas |
|
4 |
Kentucky |
|
1 |
Massachusetts |
|
2 |
Michigan |
|
10 |
Minnesota |
|
8 |
Missouri |
|
1 |
Montana |
|
3 |
Nebraska |
|
4 |
Nevada |
|
1 |
New Hampshire |
|
1 |
New Jersey |
|
6 |
New York |
|
4 |
North Dakota |
|
2 |
Ohio |
|
3 |
Pennsylvania |
|
3 |
South Dakota |
|
1 |
Tennessee |
|
5 |
Texas |
|
1 |
Utah |
|
4 |
Washington |
|
2 |
West Virginia |
|
2 |
Wisconsin |
|
10 |
Total |
|
104 |
During 2007, we plan to open restaurants in existing states and plan to add the state of
Maine.
Our Franchise Business Consultants (FBCs) are a critical position for us as well as to our
franchise community. FBCs manage the relationship between the franchisee and the franchisor and
provide an understanding of the roles, responsibilities, differences, and accountabilities of that
relationship. They are active participants towards enhancing performance, as they partner in
strategic and operational planning sessions with our franchise partners and review the individual
strategies and tactics for obtaining superior performance for the
12
franchisee. The FBCs share best practices
throughout the system and work to create a one-system mentality that benefits everyone. In
addition, they ensure compliance with obligations under our area development and franchise
agreements. Franchisees are able to utilize all available assistance from the FBCs and the
Support Center but are not required to do so.
We make periodic inspections of our franchise-operated restaurants to ensure that the
franchisee is complying with the same quality of service, operational excellence and food
specifications that is found at our company-owned restaurants. We generally provide support as it
relates to all aspects of the franchise operations including, store openings, operating
performance, and human resource strategic planning.
Our franchise-related revenue consists of area development fees, initial franchise fees and
continuing royalty payments. Our area development fee consists of a one-time, non-refundable
payment equal to $10,000 per restaurant in consideration for the services we perform in preparation
of executing each area development agreement. Substantially all of these services which include,
but are not limited to, conducting market and trade area analysis, a meeting with Famous Daves
Executive Team, and performing potential franchise background investigation, all of which are
completed prior to our execution of the area development agreement and receipt of the corresponding
area development fee. As a result, we recognize this fee in full upon receipt. Our initial
franchise fee is typically $40,000 per restaurant, of which $5,000 is recognized immediately when a
franchise agreement is signed, reflecting the commission earned and expenses incurred related to
the sale. The remaining $35,000 is included in deferred franchise fees and is recognized as
revenue, at which time we have performed substantially all of our obligations. The franchise
agreement represents a separate and distinct earnings process from the area development agreements.
Franchisees are also required to pay us a monthly royalty equal to a percentage of their net
sales, which has historically varied from 4% to 5%. Currently, new franchises pay us a monthly
royalty of 5% of their net sales.
The franchisees investment depends primarily upon restaurant size. This investment includes
the area development fee, initial franchise fee, real estate and leasehold improvements, fixtures
and equipment, POS systems, business licenses, deposits, initial food inventory, smallwares, décor
and training fees as well as working capital. All new franchisees are required to contribute 1% of
net sales to a national public relations and marketing fund dedicated to building system-wide brand
awareness.
Seasonality
Our restaurants typically generate higher revenue in the second and third quarters of our
fiscal year as a result of seasonal traffic increases experienced during the summer months, and
lower revenue in the first and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, due to possible adverse weather
which can disrupt customer and Associate transportation to our restaurants.
Government Regulation
Our Company is subject to extensive state and local government regulation by various
governmental agencies, including state and local licensing, zoning, land use, construction and
environmental regulations and various regulations relating to the sale of food and alcoholic
beverages, sanitation, disposal of refuse and waste products, public health, safety and fire
standards. Our restaurants are subject to periodic inspections by governmental agencies to ensure
conformity with such regulations. Any difficulty or failure to obtain required licensing or other
regulatory approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant, and the suspension of,
or inability to renew a license could interrupt operations at an existing restaurant, any of which
would adversely affect our operations. Restaurant operating costs are also affected by other
government actions that are beyond our control, including increases in the minimum hourly wage
requirements, workers compensation
13
insurance
rates, health care insurance costs, property and
casualty insurance, and unemployment and other taxes. We are also subject
to dram-shop statutes, which generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the
right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the
intoxicated person.
As a franchisor, we are subject to federal regulation and certain state laws that govern the
offer and sale of franchises. Many state franchise laws impose substantive requirements on
franchise agreements, including limitations on non-competition provisions and the termination or
non-renewal of a franchise. Bills have been introduced in Congress from time to time that would
provide for federal regulation of substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. As
proposed, such legislation would limit, among other things, the duration and scope of
non-competition provisions, the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a
franchise, and the ability of a franchisor to designate sources of supply.
The 1990 Federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of
disability in public accommodations and employment. We could be required to incur costs to modify
our restaurants in order to provide service to, or make reasonable accommodations for, disabled
persons. Our restaurants are currently designed to be accessible to the disabled, and we believe
we are in substantial compliance with all current applicable regulations relating to this Act.
Associates
As of December 31, 2006, we employed approximately 2,600 Associates, of which approximately
270 were full-time. None of our Associates are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We
consider our relationships with our Associates to be good.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Famous Daves makes written and oral statements from time to time, including statements
contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding its business and prospects, such as
projections of future performance, statements of managements plans and objectives, forecasts of
market trends and other matters that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Sections
27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Statements containing
the words or phrases will likely result, anticipates, are expected to, will continue,
is anticipated, estimates, projects, believes, expects, intends, target, goal,
plans, objective, should or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements which may
appear in documents, reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, news releases,
written or oral presentations made by our officers or other representatives to analysts,
shareholders, investors, news organizations, and others, and discussions with our management and
other Company representatives. For such statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Our future results, including results related to forward-looking statements, involve a number
of risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be given that the results reflected in any
forward-looking statements will be achieved. Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our
behalf speak only as of the date on which such statement is made. Our forward-looking statements
are based upon assumptions that are sometimes based upon estimates, data, communications and other
information from suppliers, government agencies and other sources that may be subject to revision.
We do not undertake any obligation to update or keep current either (i) any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of such statement, or (ii) the
important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results
or trends, results anticipated or planned by us, or which are reflected from time to time in any
forward-looking statement which may be made by us or on our behalf.
14
In addition to other matters identified or described by us from time to time in filings with
the SEC, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
there are several important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from
historical results or trends, results anticipated or planned by us, or results that are reflected
from time to time in any forward-looking statement that may be made by us or on our behalf.
Our Future Revenue and Operating Income Are Dependent on Consumer Preference and Our Ability
to Successfully Execute Our Plan.
Our Companys future revenue and operating income will depend upon various factors, including
continued and additional market acceptance of the Famous Daves concept, the quality of our
restaurant operations, our ability to grow our brand, our ability to successfully expand into new
and existing markets, our ability to successfully execute our franchise program, our ability to
raise additional financing as needed, discretionary consumer spending, the overall success of the
venues where Famous Daves restaurants are or will be located, economic conditions affecting
disposable consumer income, general economic conditions and the continued popularity of the Famous
Daves concept. An adverse change in any or all of these conditions would have a negative effect
on our operations and the market value of our common stock.
It
is our plan to open up to five company-owned restaurants and up to
20-25 franchise-operated
restaurants in fiscal 2007. There is no guarantee that any of our company-owned or
franchise-operated restaurants will open when planned, or at all, due to the risks associated with
the development of new restaurants, such as governmental approvals, the availability of sites, and
the availability of capital, many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that
we will successfully implement our growth plan for our company-owned and franchise-operated
restaurants. In addition, we also face all of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently
encountered in the development of an expanding business.
Competition May Reduce Our Revenue and Operating Income.
Competition in the restaurant industry is intense. The restaurant industry is affected by
changes in consumer preferences, as well as by national, regional and local economic conditions,
and demographic trends. Discretionary spending priorities, traffic patterns, tourist travel,
weather conditions, Associate availability and the type, number and location of competing
restaurants, among other factors, will also directly affect the performance of our restaurants.
Changes in any of these factors in the markets where we currently operate our restaurants could
adversely affect the results of our operations.
Increased competition by existing or future competitors may reduce our sales. Our restaurants
compete with moderately-priced restaurants primarily on the basis of quality of food and service,
atmosphere, location and value. In addition to existing barbeque restaurants, we expect to face
competition from steakhouses and other restaurants featuring protein-rich foods. We also compete
with other restaurants and retail establishments for quality sites. Competition in the restaurant
industry is affected by changes in consumer taste, economic and real estate conditions, demographic
trends, traffic patterns, the cost and availability of qualified labor, product availability and
local competitive factors.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources
than we do. Regional and national restaurant companies continue to expand their operations into our
current and anticipated market areas. We believe our ability to compete effectively depends on our
ongoing ability to promote our brand and offer high quality food and hospitality in a distinctive
and comfortable environment. If we are unable to respond to the various competitive factors
affecting the restaurant industry, our revenue and operating income could be adversely affected.
15
Our Failure to Execute Our Franchise Program May Negatively Impact Our Revenue and Operating
Income.
Our growth and success depends in part upon increasing the number of our franchised
restaurants, through execution of area development agreements with new and existing franchisees in
new and existing markets. Our ability to successfully franchise additional restaurants will depend
on various factors, including our ability to attract, contract with and retain quality franchisees,
the availability of suitable sites, the negotiation of acceptable leases or purchase terms for new
locations, permitting and regulatory compliance, the ability to meet construction schedules, the
financial and other capabilities of our franchisees, our ability to manage this anticipated
expansion, and general economic and business conditions. Many of the foregoing factors are beyond
the control of the Company or our franchisees.
Our growth and success also depends upon the ability of our franchisees to successfully
operate their restaurants to our standards and promote the Famous Daves brand. Although we have
established criteria to evaluate prospective franchisees, and our franchise agreements include
certain operating standards, each franchisee operates his/her restaurant independently. Various
laws limit our ability to influence the day-to-day operation of our franchise restaurants. We
cannot assure you that our franchisees will be able to successfully operate Famous Daves
restaurants in a manner consistent with our concepts and standards, which could reduce their sales
and correspondingly, our franchise royalties, and could adversely affect our operating income and
our ability to leverage the Famous Daves brand. In addition, there can be no assurance that our
franchisees will have access to financial resources necessary to open the restaurants required by
their respective area development agreements.
The Inability to Develop and Construct Our Restaurants Within Projected Budgets and Time
Periods Could Adversely Affect Our Business and Financial Condition.
Many factors may affect the costs associated with the development and construction of our
restaurants, including landlord delays, weather interference, unforeseen engineering problems,
environmental problems, construction or zoning problems, local government regulations,
modifications in design to the size and scope of the project, and other unanticipated increases in
costs, any of which could give rise to delays or cost overruns. If we are not able to develop
additional restaurants within anticipated budgets or time periods, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
The Restaurant Industry is Subject to Extensive Government Regulation That Could Negatively
Impact Our Business.
The restaurant industry is subject to extensive state and local government regulation by
various government agencies, including state and local licensing, zoning, land use, construction
and environmental regulations and various regulations relating to the preparation and sale of food
and alcoholic beverages, sanitation, disposal of refuse and waste products, public health, safety
and fire standards, minimum wage requirements, workers compensation and citizenship requirement. To
the extent that we offer and sell franchises, we are also subject to federal regulation and certain
state laws which govern the offer and sale of franchises. Many state franchise laws impose
substantive requirements on franchise agreements, including limitations on non-competition
provisions and termination or non-renewal of a franchise. We may also be subject in certain states
to dram-shop statutes, which provide a person injured by an intoxicated person the right to
recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated
person.
16
Any change in the current status of such regulations, including an increase in Associate
benefits costs, workers compensation insurance rates, or other costs associated with
Associates, could substantially increase our compliance and labor costs. Because we pay many
of our restaurant-level personnel rates based on either the federal or the state minimum wage,
increases in the minimum wage would lead to increased labor costs. In addition, our operating
results would be adversely affected in the event we fail to maintain our food and liquor licenses.
Furthermore, restaurant operating costs are affected by increases in unemployment tax rates, sales
taxes and similar costs over which we have no control.
We Are Subject to the Risks Associated With the Food Services Industry, Including the Risk
That Incidents of Food-borne Illnesses or Food Tampering Could Damage Our Reputation and
Reduce Our Restaurant Sales.
Our industry is susceptible to the risk of food-borne illnesses. As with any restaurant
operator, we cannot guarantee that our internal controls and training will be fully effective in
preventing all food-borne illnesses. Furthermore, our reliance on third-party food suppliers and
distributors increases the risk that food-borne illness incidents could be caused by third-party
food suppliers and distributors outside of our control and/or multiple locations being affected
rather than a single restaurant. New illnesses resistant to any precautions may develop in the
future, or diseases with long incubation periods could arise that could give rise to claims or
allegations on a retroactive basis. Reports in the media of one or more instances of food-borne
illness in one of our corporate-owned restaurants, one of our franchise-operated restaurants or in
one of our competitors restaurants could negatively affect our restaurant sales, force the closure
of some of our restaurants and conceivably have a national or international impact if highly
publicized. This risk exists even if it were later determined that the illness had been wrongly
attributed to the restaurant. Furthermore, other illnesses could adversely affect the supply of
some of our food products and significantly increase our costs. A decrease in customer traffic as a
result of these health concerns or negative publicity could materially harm our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Pursuant to its Authority to Designate and Issue Shares of Our Stock as it Deems Appropriate,
Our Board of Directors May Assign Rights and Privileges to Currently Undesignated Shares Which
Could Adversely Affect the Rights of Existing Shareholders.
Our authorized capital consists of 100,000,000 shares of capital stock. Our Board of
Directors, without any action by the shareholders, may designate and issue shares in such classes
or series (including classes or series of preferred stock) as it deems appropriate and establish
the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting
rights. As of March 9, 2007, we had 10,138,789 shares of common stock outstanding.
The rights of holders of preferred stock and other classes of common stock that may be issued
could be superior to the rights granted to the current holders of our common stock. Our Boards
ability to designate and issue such undesignated shares could impede or deter an unsolicited tender
offer or takeover proposal. Further, the issuance of additional shares having preferential rights
could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of holders of common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
17
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The development cost of our restaurants varies depending primarily on the size and style of
the restaurant, whether the property is purchased or leased, and whether it is a conversion of an
existing building or a newly constructed restaurant. We have developed a prototype, which is the
first-ever standard format for us. The prototype is approximately 6,000 square feet in size and
will represent a consistent brand image across all markets while still allowing for new
construction and the renovation of pre-existing restaurants. We opened three company-owned
restaurants in fiscal 2006, our first since fiscal 2003. Chantilly, Virginia opened in January
2006, Waldorf, Maryland opened in June 2006, and Coon Rapids, Minnesota opened in December 2006
using this prototype. We expect to open up to five additional company-owned restaurants with
ground-up construction during fiscal 2007.
Our leased restaurant facilities are occupied under agreements with remaining terms ranging
from 1 to 36 years, including renewal options. Such leases generally provide for fixed rental
payments plus operating expenses associated with the properties. Several leases also require the
payment of percentage rent based on net sales. We have three sublease arrangements with a
franchisee. These leases are our responsibility, but we have offered them to our franchisee on
substantially equal terms to the original leases.
Our executive offices are currently located in approximately 26,000 square feet in Minnetonka,
Minnesota, under a lease which commenced in August 2005, and which continues for a term of 97
months, plus two five-year renewal options. The minimum annual rent commitment remaining over the
lease term is approximately $4.3 million. We believe that our current restaurant properties will
be suitable for our needs and adequate for operations for the foreseeable future. We also believe
that our corporate office leased space is adequate for our operations for the foreseeable future.
18
The following table sets forth certain information about our existing company-owned
restaurant locations, as of December 31, 2006, sorted by opening date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square |
|
Interior |
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Footage |
|
Seats |
|
or Leased |
|
|
Date Opened |
1 |
|
Roseville, MN |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
June 1996 |
2 |
|
Calhoun Square (Minneapolis, MN) |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
September 1996 |
3 |
|
Maple Grove, MN(3) |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
Owned |
(1) |
|
April 1997 |
4 |
|
Highland Park (St. Paul, MN) |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Leased |
(5) |
|
June 1997 |
5 |
|
Stillwater, MN |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Owned |
(1) |
|
July 1997 |
6 |
|
Apple Valley, MN |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Owned |
(1) |
|
July 1997 |
7 |
|
Forest Lake, MN |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Leased |
(5) |
|
October 1997 |
8 |
|
Minnetonka, MN |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
December 1997 |
9 |
|
Plymouth, MN |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Owned |
(4) |
|
December 1997 |
10 |
|
West St. Paul, MN |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Leased |
(5) |
|
January 1998 |
11 |
|
West Des Moines, IA |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
April 1998 |
12 |
|
Des Moines, IA |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
April 1998 |
13 |
|
Naperville, IL |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
April 1998 |
14 |
|
Cedar Falls, IA |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
September 1998 |
15 |
|
Bloomington, MN |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
October 1998 |
16 |
|
Woodbury, MN |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
October 1998 |
17 |
|
Lincoln, NE |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
Owned |
(4) |
|
December 1999 |
18 |
|
Columbia, MD |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
January 2000 |
19 |
|
Annapolis, MD |
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
January 2000 |
20 |
|
Frederick, MD |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
January 2000 |
21 |
|
Woodbridge, VA |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
January 2000 |
22 |
|
Vernon Hills, IL |
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
February 2000 |
23 |
|
Addison, IL |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
Owned |
(4) |
|
March 2000 |
24 |
|
Lombard, IL |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
July 2000 |
25 |
|
North Riverside, IL |
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
August 2000 |
26 |
|
Sterling, VA |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
December 2000 |
27 |
|
Carpentersville, IL |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
February 2001 |
28 |
|
Oakton, VA |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
May 2001 |
29 |
|
Laurel, MD |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
August 2001 |
30 |
|
Palatine, IL |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
August 2001 |
31 |
|
Richmond I (Richmond, VA) |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
December 2001 |
32 |
|
Gaithersburg, MD |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
May 2002 |
33 |
|
Richmond II (Richmond, VA) |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
June 2002 |
34 |
|
Orland Park, IL |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
June 2002 |
35 |
|
Tulsa, OK |
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
September 2002 |
36 |
|
Virginia Commons, VA |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
Owned |
(2) |
|
June 2003 |
37 |
|
Rogers, AR |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
June 2003 |
38 |
|
Chantilly, VA |
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
Leased |
(5) |
|
January 2006 |
39 |
|
Florence, KY |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
January 2006 |
40 |
|
Waldorf, MD |
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Leased |
(5) |
|
June 2006 |
41 |
|
Coon Rapids, MN |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Owned |
(4) |
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
All seat count and square footage amounts are approximate. |
|
(1) |
|
Restaurant is collateral in a sale-leaseback financing. |
|
(2) |
|
Restaurant is subject to a mortgage. |
|
(3) |
|
Restaurant was converted in October 2005 from counter-service to full-service
and its square footage and interior seat
counts were increased. |
|
(4) |
|
Restaurant land and building
is owned by the Company. |
|
(5) |
|
Restaurant land is subject to a ground lease. |
19
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time-to-time, we are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of our management, the ultimate dispositions of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Currently, there are no significant legal matters pending.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
20
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Global Market (formerly the NASDAQ National Market
SM ) under the symbol DAVE since July 24, 1997. Our common stock traded on the NASDAQ
Small Cap Market SM prior to July 24, 1997 and since November 1996 under the same
symbol.
The following table summarizes the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common
stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the NASDAQ National Market SM:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Period |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
13.99 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.62 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
|
$ |
13.96 |
|
|
$ |
9.43 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
$ |
15.34 |
|
|
$ |
12.17 |
|
|
$ |
13.08 |
|
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
$ |
17.24 |
|
|
$ |
14.34 |
|
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
|
$ |
10.26 |
|
Holders
As of March 9, 2007, we had approximately 383 shareholders of record and an estimated 5,900
beneficial shareholders.
Dividends
Our Board of Directors has not declared any dividends on our common stock since our inception,
and does not intend to pay out any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We
presently intend to retain all earnings, if any, to provide for our growth. The payment of cash
dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will
depend upon such factors as earnings levels, capital requirements, loan agreement restrictions, our
financial condition and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The
Company maintains the 1995 Stock Option and Compensation Plan (the Management Plan), the
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan (the Employee Plan), the 1998 Director Stock Option Plan (the
Director Plan) and the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan). We have also granted stock
incentives outside of these equity compensation plans in limited situations. The Management Plan
is designed to furnish a variety of economic incentives designed to attract, retain and motivate
associates (including officers) of, and consultants to, the Company. However, no further grants of
incentive may be made under the Management Plan after December 29, 2005 because the terms of the
Management Plan prohibit such grants after the tenth anniversary of the date the Management Plan
was approved by the Companys Board of Directors. Nonetheless, the Management Plan will remain in
effect until all outstanding incentives granted hereunder have either been satisfied or terminated.
The purpose of the Employee Plan is to attract, retain and motivate associates of the Company (not
including officers and directors of the Company) by furnishing opportunities to purchase or receive
shares of the Companys Common Stock. The purpose of the Director Plan is to encourage share
ownership by Company directors who are not Associates of the Company in order to promote long-term
21
shareholder
value through continuing ownership of the Companys Common Stock. The purpose of the 2005 Plan, which was
approved by the Companys shareholders at the May 2005 annual shareholders meeting, is to increase
shareholder value and to advance the interests of the Company by furnishing a variety of economic
incentives designed to attract, retain and motivate associates (including officers), certain key
consultants and directors of the Company.
The Management Plan,
the Director Plan and the 2005 Plan have each been approved by the
Companys shareholders. The Employee Plan has not been submitted for approval to the Companys
shareholders. The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2006 with
respect to the Management Plan, the Employee Plan, the Director Plan and the 2005 Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Future Issuance Under |
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Equity Compensation |
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon |
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
|
Plans (Excluding |
|
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Securities Reflected in |
|
|
|
Outstanding Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Column (A)) |
|
Plan Category |
|
(A) |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
(C) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 Stock Option and Compensation Plan |
|
|
377,500 |
|
|
|
$ 4.98 |
|
|
|
187,986 |
(1) |
1998 Director Stock Option Plan |
|
|
180,500 |
|
|
|
$ 5.77 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
$ 10.98 |
|
|
|
420,700 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
568,000 |
|
|
|
$ 5.34 |
|
|
|
628,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 Employee Stock Option Plan |
|
|
159,681 |
|
|
|
$ 4.90 |
|
|
|
151,567 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
727,681 |
|
|
|
$ 5.24 |
|
|
|
779,753 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares reserved for issuance under the Companys existing Performance Share
Programs: 187,986 shares under the Management Plan, 94,019 shares under the Employee Plan and
6,400 shares under the 2005 Plan. |
Stock Performance Graph
The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that the Company include in this 10-K, a
line-graph presentation comparing the cumulative, five-year return to the Companys shareholders
(based on appreciation of the market price of the Companys common stock) on an indexed basis with
(i) a broad equity market index and (ii) an appropriate published industry or line-of-business
index, or peer group index constructed by the Company. The following presentation compares the
Companys common stock price for the period from December 30, 2001 through December 31, 2006, to
the S&P 500 Stock Index and to the S&P Small Cap Restaurant Index.
The Company has elected to use the S&P Small Cap Restaurant Index in compiling its stock
performance graph because it believes the S&P Small Cap Restaurant Index represents a comparison to
competitors with similar market capitalization to the Company.
The presentation assumes that the value of an investment in each of the Companys common
stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Small Cap Restaurant Index was $100 on December 30, 2001, and
that any dividends paid were reinvested in the same security.
22
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
Among Famous Daves Of America, Inc., The S&P 500 Index,
And The S&P Small Cap Restaurant Index
TOTAL
RETURN TO STOCKHOLDERS
(Assumes $100 investment on
12/30/01)
(fiscal year end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return Analysis |
|
|
12/30/2001 |
|
|
12/29/2002 |
|
|
12/28/2003 |
|
|
1/2/2005 |
|
|
1/1/2006 |
|
|
12/31/2006 |
|
|
Famous Daves of America |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
41.32 |
|
|
|
$ |
68.71 |
|
|
|
$ |
177.33 |
|
|
|
$ |
156.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
229.35 |
|
|
|
S&P Small Cap Restaurants |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
102.28 |
|
|
|
$ |
146.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
178.49 |
|
|
|
$ |
182.07 |
|
|
|
$ |
201.65 |
|
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
76.59 |
|
|
|
$ |
97.57 |
|
|
|
$ |
110.23 |
|
|
|
$ |
115.64 |
|
|
|
$ |
133.76 |
|
|
|
Source:
CTA Public Relations www.ctapr.com (303) 665-4200. Data from Bridge Information Systems.
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER
On May 9, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a third stock repurchase plan that
authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 1.0 million shares of our common stock. The plan
authorized us to purchase shares from time-to-time in both the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions. The repurchase is expected to be funded from the Companys available
working capital and through sources such as the Companys Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2006, we completed the purchase of 611,430 outstanding shares under this
program at an average market price of $15.20, excluding commissions. All share repurchases were
made pursuant to open-market transactions under the publicly announced repurchase program approved
by our Board of Directors, and funded from our working capital.
23
The following table includes information about our share repurchases for the fourth quarter
ended December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
(or Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Total |
|
Average |
|
(or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
Number of |
|
Price Paid |
|
Purchased as Part |
|
(or Units) |
|
|
Shares |
|
per |
|
of Publicly |
|
that May Yet be |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
Share(1) |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
Month #10
(October 2, 2006 October 29, 2006) |
|
|
68,600 |
|
|
$ |
15.35 |
|
|
|
430,930 |
|
|
|
569,070 |
|
Month #11
(October 30, 2006 November 26, 2006) |
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
$ |
16.53 |
|
|
|
544,930 |
|
|
|
455,070 |
|
Month #12
(November 27, 2006 December 31, 2006) |
|
|
66,500 |
|
|
$ |
16.54 |
|
|
|
611,430 |
|
|
|
388,570 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excluding Commissions |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, and in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
The selected financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 (fiscal
year 2006), January 1, 2006 (fiscal year 2005), January 2, 2005 (fiscal year 2004), December 28,
2003 (fiscal year 2003) and December 29, 2002 (fiscal year 2002) have been derived from our
consolidated financial statements as audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm.
24
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL YEAR |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 (1) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
($s in 000s, except per share data and
average weekly sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
116,621 |
|
|
$ |
102,354 |
|
|
$ |
99,325 |
|
|
$ |
97,740 |
|
|
$ |
90,820 |
|
Asset impairment and estimated lease
termination and other closing costs
(2) |
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,238 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
9,243 |
|
|
$ |
8,735 |
|
|
$ |
7,437 |
|
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
$ |
4,470 |
|
Equity in loss of unconsolidated
affiliate (3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,155 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,994 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,700 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,900 |
) |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
|
$ |
(2,898 |
) |
|
$ |
(928 |
) |
Basic net income (loss) per common
share |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per common
share |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (at year end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
|
$ |
11,170 |
|
|
$ |
9,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,473 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
65,642 |
|
|
$ |
67,598 |
|
|
$ |
71,913 |
|
|
$ |
73,767 |
|
|
$ |
74,817 |
|
Long-term debt less current
maturities(4) |
|
$ |
12,619 |
|
|
$ |
15,930 |
|
|
$ |
16,453 |
|
|
$ |
16,954 |
|
|
$ |
17,354 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
35,835 |
|
|
$ |
37,888 |
|
|
$ |
43,485 |
|
|
$ |
46,872 |
|
|
$ |
47,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of restaurants open at year end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-owned restaurants |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Franchise-operated restaurants |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restaurants |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Company-owned comparable store
sales increase (decrease) (5) |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
%(6) |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
Average weekly sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-owned restaurants |
|
$ |
47,894 |
|
|
$ |
45,072 |
|
|
$ |
44,164 |
|
|
$ |
42,491 |
|
|
$ |
45,783 |
|
Franchise-operated restaurants |
|
$ |
58,334 |
|
|
$ |
55,011 |
|
|
$ |
51,538 |
|
|
$ |
47,400 |
|
|
$ |
46,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fiscal 2004 consisted of 53 weeks. Fiscal 2006, 2005, 2003, and 2002 all consisted of 52 weeks. |
|
(2) |
|
Fiscal 2006 reflects impairment charges associated with one restaurant and land held for sale: one which was subsequently sold, the other which
was subsequently closed. Fiscal 2003 charges reflect impairment and restructuring costs associated with five restaurants: two of which were subsequently sold, two of which were
subsequently closed, and one that was fully impaired, but still operating. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents our 40% unconsolidated interest in FUMUME, LLC. Fiscal 2003 expenses represent operating losses and transaction costs related to our divestiture. We have no
further obligation regarding this joint venture. |
|
(4) |
|
Long-term debt consists of total debt, including capital lease obligations and financing leases, less current maturities. |
|
(5) |
|
Our comparable store sales base includes company-owned restaurants that are open year round and have been open more than 18 months. |
|
(6) |
|
For purposes of computing comparable store sales, this computation assumes fiscal 2004 was a 52-week year. |
25
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on information currently
available to us as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we assume no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Such factors may include, among others, those factors listed in Item 1A of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our other filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. The following discussion should be read in conjunction
with Selected Financial Data above (Item 6 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and our financial
statements and related footnotes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Famous Daves of America, Inc. was incorporated as a Minnesota corporation in March 1994 and
opened its first restaurant in Minneapolis in June 1995. As of December 31, 2006, there were 145
Famous Daves restaurants operating in 35 states, including 41 company-owned restaurants and 104
franchise-operated restaurants. An additional 162 franchise restaurants were committed to be
developed through signed area development agreements at December 31, 2006.
Fiscal Year Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31st. Our
fiscal year is generally 52 weeks; however it periodically consists of 53 weeks. Fiscal 2006 and
Fiscal 2005, which ended on December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, respectively, consisted of 52
weeks. Fiscal 2004, which ended on January 2, 2005, consisted of 53 weeks.
Basis of Presentation The financial results presented and discussed herein reflect our
results and the results of our wholly-owned and majority-owned consolidated subsidiaries. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The following discussion and
analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations is based upon its financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities and expenses, and
related disclosures. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments. By
their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience, observance of trends in the
industry, information provided by customers and other outside sources and on various other factors
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements. Our Companys significant accounting policies are described in Note One to the
consolidated financial statements included herein for the year ended December 31, 2006.
26
We have discussed the development and selection of the following critical accounting estimates
with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our
disclosures relating to such estimates in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Recognition of Franchise-Related Revenue Initial franchise revenue is recognized when we
have performed substantially all of our obligations as franchisor. Franchise royalties are
recognized when earned as promulgated by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 45,
Accounting for Franchise Fee Revenue.
Our franchise-related revenue consists of area development fees, initial franchise fees and
continuing royalty payments. Our area development fee consists of a one-time, non-refundable
payment equal to $10,000 per restaurant in consideration for the services we perform in preparation
of executing each area development agreement. Substantially all of these services which include,
but are not limited to, conducting market and trade area analysis, a meeting with Famous Daves
Executive Team, and performing potential franchise background investigation, all of which are
completed prior to our execution of the area development agreement and receipt of the corresponding
area development fee. As a result, we recognize this fee in full upon receipt. Our initial
franchise fee is typically $40,000 per restaurant, of which $5,000 is recognized immediately when a
franchise agreement is signed, reflecting the commission earned and expenses incurred related to
the sale. The remaining $35,000 is included in deferred franchise fees and is recognized as
revenue, at which time we have performed substantially all of our obligations. The franchise
agreement represents a separate and distinct earnings process from the area development agreements.
Franchisees are also required to pay us a monthly royalty equal to a percentage of their net
sales, which has historically varied from 4% to 5%. Currently, new franchises pay us a monthly
royalty of 5% of their net sales.
Franchise-related revenue for fiscal 2006 was approximately $15.6 million, a 30.2% increase
compared to franchise-related revenue of approximately $12.0 million for the same period in fiscal
2005, primarily reflecting increased royalties. Royalties, which are based on a percent of
franchise-operated restaurant net sales, increased 32.6%, reflecting the annualization of franchise
restaurants that opened in fiscal 2005 in addition to the franchise-operated restaurants that
opened during fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2006, 21 franchised-operated restaurants opened, 4 closed
and one became a company-owned restaurant. There were 104 franchise-operated restaurants open at
December 31, 2006, compared to 88 at January 1, 2006. Up to 20-25 franchise restaurants are
anticipated to open throughout fiscal 2007.
27
Asset Impairment and Restructuring Charges In accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate restaurant sites and long-lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of restaurant sites to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of the restaurant site to the undiscounted future net cash
flows expected to be generated on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. If a restaurant is determined
to be impaired, the loss is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the restaurant
site exceeds its fair value. Fair value is estimated based on the best information available
including estimated future cash flows, expected growth rates in comparable restaurant sales,
remaining lease terms and other factors. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be
required to take additional impairment charges for the related assets. Considerable management
judgment is necessary to estimate future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary
significantly from such estimates. Restaurant sites that are operating but have been previously
impaired are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to
sell. In December 2006, we consummated the sale of a restaurant that had been previously closed.
This location had been previously impaired to $1.3 million and then subsequently written down to
$1.0 million in June 2006.
We also recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $502,000 during the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 for an underperforming company-owned restaurant in the Chicago, Illinois
market that closed on July 28, 2006. This impairment charge reflected the non-cash, write-down of
the net book value of the assets at that restaurant. We sublease the real property on which the
closed restaurant is located under a lease that expires in November 2010. Aggregate future lease
commitments, including lease obligations, common area maintenance and real estate taxes during the
remaining term were approximately $689,000 at the time of the closing. In the third quarter, we
recorded an additional charge of approximately $332,000, which included estimated lease termination
costs, net of deferred rent, and other closure costs. We are currently marketing this restaurant
for sub-lease.
Deferred Tax Asset Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for financial statement purposes and such amounts
measured in accordance with tax laws. Realization of net operating loss carry forwards and other
deferred tax temporary differences are contingent on future taxable earnings. During fiscal 2006,
our deferred tax asset was reviewed for expected utilization using a more likely than not
approach as required by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by assessing the available
positive and negative evidence surrounding its recoverability. We believe that the realization of
the deferred tax asset is more likely than not based on the fact that the Company generated taxable
income in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004 and based on the expectation that we will
generate the necessary taxable income in future years.
Lease Accounting In accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, we recognize lease
expense for our operating leases over the entire lease term including lease renewal options where
the renewal is certain and the build-out period takes place prior to the restaurant opening or
lease commencement date. We account for construction allowances by recording a receivable when its
collectibility is considered certain, depreciating the leasehold improvements over the lesser of
their useful lives or the full term of the lease, including renewal options and build-out periods,
amortizing the construction allowance as a credit to rent expense over the full term of the lease,
including renewal options and build-out periods, and relieving the receivable once the cash is
obtained from the landlord for the construction allowance. We record rent expense during the
build-out period and classify this expense as pre-opening expenses in our Statement of Operations.
28
Results of Operations
Revenue Our franchise-related revenue consists of area development fees, initial franchise
fees and continuing royalty payments. Our area development fee consists of a one-time,
non-refundable payment equal to $10,000 per restaurant in consideration for the services we perform
in preparation of executing each area development agreement. Substantially all of these services
which include, but are not limited to, conducting market and trade area analysis, a meeting with
Famous Daves Executive Team, and performing potential franchise background investigation, all of
which are completed prior to our execution of the area development agreement and receipt of the
corresponding area development fee. As a result, we recognize this fee in full upon receipt. Our
initial franchise fee is typically $40,000 per restaurant, of which $5,000 is recognized
immediately when a franchise agreement is signed, reflecting the commission earned and expenses
incurred related to the sale. The remaining $35,000 is included in deferred franchise fees and is
recognized as revenue, at which time we have performed substantially all of our obligations. The
franchise agreement represents a separate and distinct earnings process from the area development
agreements. Franchisees are also required to pay us a monthly royalty equal to a percentage of
their net sales, which has historically varied from 4% to 5%. Currently, new franchises pay us a
monthly royalty of 5% of their net sales.
Costs and Expenses Restaurant costs and expenses include food and beverage costs, operating
payroll and Associate benefits, occupancy costs, repair and maintenance costs, supplies,
advertising and promotion, and restaurant depreciation and amortization. Certain of these costs and
expenses are variable and will increase or decrease with sales volume. The primary fixed costs are
corporate and restaurant management salaries and occupancy costs. Our experience is that when a new
restaurant opens, it incurs higher than normal levels of labor and food costs until operations
stabilize, usually during the first three to four months of operation. As restaurant management and
staff gain experience following a restaurants opening, labor scheduling, food cost management and
operating expense control are improved to levels similar to those at our more established
restaurants.
General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses include all
corporate and administrative functions that provide an infrastructure to support existing
operations and support future growth. Salaries, bonuses, Associate benefits, legal fees, accounting
fees, consulting fees, travel, rent, and general insurance are major items in this category. We
record expenses for Managers in Training (MITs) in this category for approximately six weeks
prior to a restaurant opening. We also provide franchise services, the revenue of which are
included in other revenue and the expenses of which are included in general and administrative
expenses.
29
The following table presents items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as a
percentage of total revenue or net restaurant sales, as indicated, for the following fiscal years
(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Food and beverage costs (1) |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
Labor and benefits (1) |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
Operating expenses (1) |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
24.7 |
% |
Depreciation & amortization (restaurant level) (1) |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Depreciation & amortization (corporate level) (2) |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Asset impairment and estimated lease termination
and other closing costs (1) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-opening expenses & loss on disposal of property (1) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses (2) |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
90.5 |
% |
Income from operations (2) |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of restaurant sales, net |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of total revenue |
|
(3) |
|
Data regarding our restaurant operations as presented in the table, includes sales,
costs and expenses associated with our Rib Team, which netted to a loss of $7,000, a loss of
$48,000 and a loss of $147,000 respectively in fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004. Our Rib Team
travels around the country introducing people to our brand of barbeque and builds brand awareness. |
30
Fiscal Year 2006 Compared to Fiscal Year 2005
Total Revenue Total revenue of approximately $116.6 million for fiscal 2006 increased
approximately $14.3 million or 13.9% over total revenue of approximately $102.4 million for fiscal
2005. Fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 both consisted of 52 weeks.
Restaurant Sales Restaurant sales were approximately $100.0 million for fiscal 2006 and
$89.2 million for fiscal 2005. Fiscal 2006 sales results included the impact of three new
company-owned restaurants opening during the period and a comparable sales increase of 2.9%. In
addition, there was a positive impact from a weighted average price increase during fiscal 2006
equal to approximately 1.7%. Fiscal 2005 sales reflected a 2.1% comparable sales growth, primarily
from an increase in our catering and TO GO business, and the impact of weighted-average price
increases equal to less than 2.0%. Fiscal 2005 sales results reflect the two-week closure of our
Maple Grove, Minnesota location during the third quarter of fiscal 2005 for conversion from
counter-service to full-service, which negatively impacted fiscal 2005 sales by approximately
$100,000. Our category leadership in off-premise sales continues to strengthen, as catering and TO
GO accounted for approximately 32.6% of sales in fiscal 2006, compared with approximately 32.0% of
sales in fiscal 2005.
Franchise-Related Revenue Franchise-related revenue consists of royalty revenue and
franchise fees, which include initial franchise fees and area development fees. Franchise-related
revenue for fiscal 2006 was approximately $15.6 million, a 30.2% increase when compared to
franchise-related revenue of approximately $12.0 million for the same period in fiscal 2005,
primarily reflecting increased royalties. Royalties, which are based on a percent of
franchise-operated restaurants net sales, increased 32.6% reflecting the annualization of
franchise restaurants that opened in fiscal 2005 in addition to the net 16 new franchise
restaurants opened during fiscal 2006. Fiscal 2006 included 4,837 franchise operating weeks,
compared to 3,885 franchise operating weeks in fiscal 2005, representing an increase of
approximately 24.5%. There were 104 franchise-operated restaurants open at December 31, 2006,
compared to 88 at January 1, 2006.
Licensing and Other Revenue Licensing revenue includes royalties from a retail line of
business, including sauces, rubs, marinades, seasonings, and other items. Other revenue includes
opening assistance and training we provide to our franchise partners. For fiscal 2006, the
licensing royalty income was approximately $279,000 compared to approximately $285,000 for fiscal
2005. During fiscal 2007, we expect to see licensing revenue remain essentially flat compared to
fiscal 2006 levels. Other revenue for fiscal 2006 was approximately $695,000, compared to
approximately $820,000 in fiscal 2005. The amount of other revenue has declined due to a greater
use in fiscal 2006 of other franchise associate trainers with the increased number of openings.
The amount of other revenue is expected to remain essentially flat based on the level of opening
assistance we expect to provide during the 20-25 franchise openings planned for fiscal 2007.
Same Store Net Sales It is our policy to include in our same store net sales base,
restaurants that are open year round and have been open for at least 18 months. At the end of
fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, there were 37 and 38 restaurants, respectively, included in this base.
Same store net sales for fiscal 2006 increased approximately 2.9%, compared to fiscal 2005s
increase of approximately 2.1%. We believe that the increase in same store net sales reflects the
combination of our advertising initiatives, the success of our LTOs, weighted average price
increases of approximately 1.7% and a focus on operational excellence and execution in our
restaurants. Same store net sales for franchise-operated restaurants for fiscal 2006 decreased
approximately 1.6%, compared to a decrease of approximately 1.2% for the prior year comparable
period. For fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, there were 49 and 36 restaurants, respectively, included
in franchise-operated comparable sales.
31
Average Weekly Net Sales The following table shows company-owned and franchise-operated
average weekly net sales for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
Company-Owned |
|
$ |
47,894 |
|
|
$ |
45,072 |
|
Full-Service |
|
$ |
49,482 |
|
|
$ |
46,114 |
|
Counter-Service |
|
$ |
38,887 |
|
|
$ |
40,431 |
|
Franchise-Operated |
|
$ |
58,334 |
|
|
$ |
55,011 |
|
Food and Beverage Costs Food and beverage costs for fiscal 2006 were approximately $30.4
million or 30.4% of net restaurant sales compared to approximately $27.3 million or 30.6% of net
restaurant sales for fiscal 2005. Results reflect the impact of contract price decreases in our
core proteins during fiscal 2006, in addition to our ability to leverage our menu and offset higher
food costs through usage of our LTOs. As a percentage of dine-in sales, our adult beverage sales
at our company-owned restaurants are approximately 10.0%. We have determined that we are limited in
our ability to grow the bar in the majority of our locations due to the fact that these locations
have little to no designated bar, and some restaurants only have beer and wine. Were encouraged
by the prospects of growing this business on a go-forward basis, as our recent new Company-owned
restaurants have achieved rates slightly higher than our Company average for their adult beverage
sales as a percentage of dine-in sales. Approximately 86% of our purchases are on contract. Our
annual pork contract renewal in October 2006 resulted in a 2.65% price decrease for fiscal 2007,
our poultry contract pricing resulted in an increase of 4% for fiscal 2007 and our brisket
contract had a 6% increase for a five month period expiring in May 2007. Pork represents 32% of our
total purchases, while chicken is 10%, and beef is 10%.
We anticipate that food costs, as a percent of net restaurant sales, will be essentially flat
for fiscal 2007 over the prior year. We believe that we have an opportunity to mitigate the
negative impact, if any, that any food contract pricing may have on our margin through menu
engineering such as with the use of our LTOs which typically carry more margin than many of our
core product offerings. We will continue to take price increases as appropriate, and leverage
adult beverage sales, which typically have higher margins.
Labor and Benefits Labor and benefits at the restaurant level were approximately $30.0
million or 30.0% of net restaurant sales in fiscal 2006 compared to approximately $26.2 million or
29.3% of net restaurant sales in fiscal 2005. The increase in labor and benefits reflects higher
labor costs, partially due to a minimum wage increase in Maryland, higher labor costs associated
with opening three new restaurants in fiscal 2006, in addition to
higher workers compensation
expense.
Operating Expenses Operating expenses for fiscal 2006 were approximately $25.3 million or
25.3% of net restaurant sales, compared to approximately $22.3 million or 25.0% of net restaurant
sales for fiscal 2005. The increase in fiscal 2006 restaurant level operating expenses is
primarily due to increased supplies expense from catering and TO GO sales, and increased
utilities costs. Additionally, advertising expenses for fiscal 2006 were 3.5% of net restaurant
sales compared to 3.2% in fiscal 2005, including 1.0% to the national advertising fund. Fiscal
2007 advertising expenses are expected to remain at 3.5% of net restaurant sales, which includes
1.0% to the national advertising fund. During fiscal 2007, operating expenses as a percentage of
net restaurant sales are expected to be relatively flat from the percentage in fiscal 2006.
32
Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2006 was
approximately $4.4 million, or 3.8% of total revenue, compared to approximately $4.4 million, or
4.3% of total revenue for fiscal 2005. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense as a
percent of total revenue in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 is primarily due to the closure of
our Streamwood, Illinois restaurant, and the reclassification to assets held for sale of two
restaurants currently being marketed. During fiscal 2007, depreciation and amortization is
expected to increase from fiscal 2006 levels due to approximately $15.0 million in expected capital
expenditures for asset additions for new and existing company-owned restaurants and other
infrastructure projects.
General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses totaled
approximately $15.4 million or 13.2% of total revenue in fiscal 2006 compared to approximately
$13.4 million or 13.1% of total revenue in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, general and administrative
expenses included $1.4 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for stock-based compensation expense as
related to our performance share programs, options expense from the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the
issuance of shares to our Board of Directors for service during fiscal 2006 and our deferred stock
unit plan. In fiscal 2005, general and administrative expenses included $566,000 for stock-based
compensation expense, or $0.03 per diluted share. Excluding stock-based compensation expense, the
percentage would have been 12.0% for fiscal 2006 and 12.6% for fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2007, we
expect general and administrative expenses to increase by approximately 50 basis points primarily
from increased cost related to our performance share program and to increased infrastructure to
support corporate growth of five additional restaurants. We expect stock-based compensation to be
approximately $2.1 million in fiscal 2007, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Director |
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Performance Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Total |
|
Q1 |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
545 |
|
Q2 |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
Q3 |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
Q4 |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
2,064 |
|
Asset Impairment and Estimated Lease Termination and Other Closing Costs During fiscal 2006
we recorded lease termination and closing costs of approximately $1.1 million for the closure of
our Streamwood, Illinois restaurant and the write-down of our Mesquite, Texas location to fair
market value prior to its sale in December 2006. During fiscal 2005, we did not record any asset
impairment or restructuring charges.
Pre-opening Expenses We had approximately $625,000 in pre-opening expenses for fiscal 2006
related primarily to the opening of three company-owned restaurants in fiscal 2006. We had
approximately $96,000 in pre-opening expenses for fiscal 2005 related primarily to our Chantilly,
Virginia restaurant, which opened in January 2006, and our Maple Grove, Minnesota restaurant
conversion. We plan to open up to five company-owned restaurants during fiscal 2007 with
pre-opening costs estimated at approximately $220,000 $230,000 per restaurant. Each restaurant
will also have pre-opening rent for approximately 16 weeks prior to opening which will vary based
on their lease terms.
Loss
on Early Extinguishment of Debt On May 31, 2006, we elected to repay two notes prior to their expiration, and paid
approximately $3.0 million to retire the notes early. This repayment resulted in a $148,000
non-cash charge to write-off deferred financing fees in the second
quarter of fiscal 2006, which was essentially offset by interest savings from the date of the transaction through the
end of fiscal 2006.
33
Interest Expense Interest expense totaled approximately $1.8 million or 1.5% of total
revenue for fiscal 2006, compared to approximately $1.9 million or 1.9% of total revenue for fiscal
2005. This includes interest expense for notes payable, financing lease obligations and a company
match for deferrals made under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. For fiscal 2007, we
expect interest expense to be slightly lower than fiscal 2006 levels due to the early payoff of
$3.0 million of notes payable in fiscal 2006, partially offset by any interest resulting from the
use of our line of credit.
Interest Income Interest income was approximately $331,000 and $270,000 for fiscal 2006 and
fiscal 2005, respectively. Interest income reflects interest received on short-term cash and cash
equivalent balances. We expect fiscal 2007 interest income to decrease compared to fiscal 2006
levels due to lower cash balances with cash being utilized for construction of five
company-owned restaurants, our share buy-back program, and other general capital needs.
Other Income (Expense), Net During fiscal 2006, we realized other expense, net of
approximately $14,000, which compares to other income, net, of approximately $18,000 in fiscal
2005.
Provision for Income Taxes We recorded a provision for income taxes during fiscal 2006 of
approximately $2.7 million which compares to a provision of approximately $2.7 million in fiscal
2005. We utilized approximately $11.0 million of federal and state net operating loss carry
forwards in fiscal 2006 as compared to approximately $8.0 million in fiscal 2005. At December 31,
2006, we had a remaining deferred tax asset of approximately $4.1 million. We believe that the
realization of the deferred tax asset is more likely than not based on the fact that we generated
taxable income in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 and based on the expectation that our Company will
generate the necessary taxable income in future years. Utilization of federal net operating losses
will be achieved through offsetting tax liabilities generated through earnings, increased by
payments of current taxes to state authorities. We had an effective tax rate of 35.6% for fiscal
2006 compared to 38.0% for fiscal 2005. The lower effective tax rate was primarily due to a change
in methodology in computing the overall state tax rate. We estimate a tax rate of 36.0% for fiscal
2007.
Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Common Share Net income for fiscal 2006 was approximately
$4.9 million or $0.47 per basic common share on approximately 10,453,000 weighted average basic
shares outstanding compared to a net income of approximately $4.4 million or $0.41 per basic common
share on approximately 10,825,000 weighted average basic shares outstanding for fiscal 2005.
Diluted net income per common share for fiscal 2006 was $0.46 per common share on
approximately 10,801,000 weighted average diluted shares outstanding compared to $0.39 per common
share on approximately 11,173,000 weighted average diluted shares outstanding for fiscal 2005.
Fiscal Year 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year 2004
Total Revenue Total revenue of approximately $102.4 million for fiscal 2005 increased
approximately $3.1 million or 3.0% over total revenue of approximately $99.3 million for fiscal
2004. Fiscal 2005 consisted of 52 weeks as compared to 53 weeks for fiscal 2004. Revenue for the
53rd week in fiscal 2004 was approximately $1.9 million, including restaurant sales and
franchise royalties.
34
Restaurant Sales Restaurant sales were approximately $89.2 million for fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2004. The 53rd week of fiscal 2004 contributed approximately $1.7 million in
sales. Fiscal 2005 sales results reflect the two-week closure of our Maple Grove, Minnesota
location during the third quarter of fiscal 2005 for its conversion from counter-service to
full-service, which negatively impacted fiscal 2005 sales by approximately $100,000. These were
offset by increased comparable sales growth, primarily from an increase in our catering and TO GO
business, and the impact of weighted-average price increases during fiscal 2005 equal to less than
2.0%. Our category leadership in off-premise sales accounted for approximately 32.0% of sales in
fiscal 2005, compared with approximately 30.0% of sales in fiscal 2004.
Franchise-Related Revenue Franchise-related revenue consists of royalty revenue and
franchise fees, which include initial franchise fees and area development fees. Franchise-related
revenue for fiscal 2005 was approximately $12.0 million, a 28.6% increase when compared to
franchise-related revenue of approximately $9.3 million for the same period in fiscal 2004,
primarily reflecting increased royalties. Royalties, which are based on a percent of
franchise-operated restaurants net sales, increased 41.5% reflecting the annualization of
franchise restaurants that opened in fiscal 2004 in addition to the net 22 new franchise
restaurants opened during fiscal 2005. Fiscal 2005 included 3,885 franchise operating weeks,
compared to 2,931 franchise operating weeks in fiscal 2004, representing an increase of
approximately 32.5%. There were 88 franchise-operated restaurants open at January 1, 2006,
compared to 66 at January 2, 2005.
Licensing and Other Revenue Licensing revenue includes royalties from a retail line of
business, including sauces, rubs, marinades and seasonings. Other revenue includes opening
assistance and training we provide to our franchise partners. For fiscal 2005, the licensing
royalty income was approximately $285,000 compared to approximately $248,000 for fiscal 2004.
Other revenue for fiscal 2005 was $820,000, compared to $571,000 in fiscal 2004. The amount of
other revenue has grown based on the level of opening assistance we provided during fiscal 2005 for
the opening of new franchise restaurants.
Same Store Net Sales It is our policy to include in our same store net sales base,
restaurants that are open year round and have been open for at least 18 months. At the end of
fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, there were 38 restaurants included in this base. Same store net sales
for fiscal 2005 increased approximately 2.1%, compared to fiscal 2004s increase of approximately
1.1% as calculated assuming fiscal 2004 was a 52-week year. We believe that the increase in same
store net sales reflects the combination of our advertising initiatives, the success of our LTOs,
weighted average price increases of less than 2.0% and a focus on operational excellence and
execution in our restaurants. Same store net sales for franchise-operated restaurants for fiscal
2005 decreased approximately 1.2%, compared to a decrease of approximately 1.9% for the prior year
comparable period. For fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, there were 52 and 34 restaurants,
respectively, included in franchise-operated comparable sales.
Average Weekly Net Sales The following table shows company-owned and franchise-operated
average weekly net sales for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Company-Owned |
|
$ |
45,072 |
|
|
$ |
44,164 |
|
Full-Service |
|
$ |
46,114 |
|
|
$ |
45,253 |
|
Counter-Service |
|
$ |
40,431 |
|
|
$ |
39,342 |
|
Franchise-Operated |
|
$ |
55,011 |
|
|
$ |
51,538 |
|
35
Food and Beverage Costs Food and beverage costs for fiscal 2005 were approximately $27.3
million or 30.6% of net restaurant sales compared to approximately $28.0 million or 31.4% of net
restaurant sales for fiscal 2004. Results reflect the impact of weighted-average price increases
of less than 2.0% implemented during fiscal 2005, in addition to our ability to leverage our menu
and offset higher food costs through usage of our LTOs. As a percentage of dine-in sales, our
adult beverage sales at our company-owned restaurants are approximately 10.0%. Approximately 86%
of our purchases are on contract.
Labor and Benefits Labor and benefits at the restaurant level were approximately $26.2
million or 29.3% of net restaurant sales in fiscal 2005 compared to approximately $26.5 million or
29.7% of net restaurant sales in fiscal 2004. The decrease in labor and benefits reflects
favorable medical claims experience and labor productivity, partially off-set by a higher level of
bonus payout at the restaurant level.
Operating Expenses Operating expenses for fiscal 2005 were approximately $22.3 million or
25.0% of net restaurant sales, compared to approximately $22.0 million or 24.7% of net restaurant
sales for fiscal 2004. The increase in fiscal 2005 restaurant level operating expenses as a
percentage of restaurant sales is primarily due to increased supplies expense from catering and TO
GO sales, increased utilities costs, as well as increased advertising costs.
Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2005 was
approximately $4.4 million, or 4.3% of total revenue, compared to approximately $4.5 million, or
4.6% of total revenue for fiscal 2004. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense as a
percent of total revenue in fiscal 2005 compared to fiscal 2004 is primarily due to better
leveraging of these costs.
General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses totaled
approximately $13.4 million or 13.1% of total revenue in fiscal 2005 compared to approximately
$10.9 million or 11.0% of total revenue in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, general and administrative
expenses included $567,000 in stock-based compensation expense. In fiscal 2004, general and
administrative expenses included $211,000 in stock-based compensation expense. Excluding
stock-based compensation expense, the percentage would have been 12.6% for fiscal 2005 and 10.8%
for the comparable period in fiscal 2004. The remaining increase in the percentages primarily
reflects planned investments in infrastructure in anticipation of our growth.
Asset Impairment and Estimated Lease Termination and other Closing Costs During fiscal 2005
and fiscal 2004, we did not record any asset impairment or restructuring charges. As of January 1,
2006 and January 2, 2005, we had approximately $1.3 million of assets held for sale on our
consolidated balance sheets representing the land and building for a restaurant in Texas for which
an impairment was previously recorded and the restaurant was subsequently closed.
Pre-opening Expenses We had approximately $96,000 in pre-opening expenses for fiscal 2005
related primarily to our Chantilly, Virginia restaurant, which opened January 11, 2006, and our
Maple Grove, Minnesota restaurant conversion. We did not incur any pre-opening expenses during
fiscal 2004.
Interest Expense Interest expense totaled approximately $1.9 million or 1.9% of total
revenue for fiscal 2005, essentially equal to fiscal 2004s interest expense in terms of dollars
and as a percentage of total revenue. This line item represents interest expense from capital
lease obligations, notes payable, financing lease obligations and a company match for deferrals
made under our non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Interest Income Interest income was approximately $270,000 and $326,000 for fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2004, respectively. Interest income reflects interest received on short-term cash and cash
equivalent balances. Fiscal 2005 interest income was lower than fiscal 2004 due to lower cash
balances.
36
Other Income (Expense), Net During fiscal 2005, we realized other income, net, of
approximately $18,000, which compares to other expense, net, of approximately $464,000 in fiscal
2004. The other expense in fiscal 2004 is primarily due to a write-off of a restaurants remaining
assets subsequent to the sale to a franchise.
Provision for Income Taxes We recorded a provision for income taxes during fiscal 2005 of
approximately $2.7 million which compares to a provision of approximately $1.9 million in fiscal
2004. We utilized approximately $8.0 million of federal and state net operating loss carry
forwards in fiscal 2005 as compared to approximately $5.0 million in fiscal 2004.
Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Common Share Net income for fiscal 2005 was approximately
$4.4 million or $0.41 per basic common share on approximately 10,825,000 weighted average basic
shares outstanding compared to a net income of approximately $3.5 million or $0.29 per basic common
share on approximately 11,858,000 weighted average basic shares outstanding for fiscal 2004.
Diluted net income per common share for fiscal 2005 was $0.39 per common share on
approximately 11,173,000 weighted average diluted shares outstanding compared to $0.29 per common
share on approximately 12,222,000 weighted average diluted shares outstanding for fiscal 2004.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This
standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. The fair value option established by Statement 159 permits all entities to choose to
measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. Statement 159 is effective for
the company as of December 31, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will
have on our consolidated statement of financial position.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
for interim periods within those years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands the related disclosure requirements. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact of this statement on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB 108 was issued to provide consistency between how registrants quantify financial
statement misstatements.
Historically, there have been two widely-used methods for quantifying the effects of financial
statement misstatements. These methods are referred to as the roll-over and iron curtain
methods. The roll-over method quantifies the amount by which the current year income statement is
misstated. The iron curtain method quantifies the error as the cumulative amount by which the
current year balance sheet is misstated. SAB 108 established an approach that requires
quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the effects of the misstatement on
each of the companys financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. This
approach is commonly referred to as the dual approach.
SAB 108 allows registrants to initially apply the dual approach either by (1) retroactively
adjusting prior financial statements as if the dual approach had always been used or by (2)
recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the dual approach as adjustments to the
carrying
37
values
of assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance
of retained earnings. Our adoption of SAB 108 using the cumulative effect transition method in
connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements had no impact for the year
ending December 31, 2006.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation clarifies the application
of FASB Statement No. 109 by defining a criterion that an individual tax position must meet for any
part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprises financial statements.
Additionally, this Interpretation provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The
Interpretation will be effective for us at the beginning of fiscal 2007. We have evaluated
the impact and have determined that the adoption of FIN No. 48 will not be material to our
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP No. 123R-3, Transition Election
Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3). The Company
has elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in FSP 123 R-3 for calculating the
tax effects of stock-based compensation under SFAS 123R. The alternative transition method
includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in-capital
pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of stock-based compensation, and for determining the
subsequent impact on the APIC pool and consolidated statement of cash flows of the tax effects of
stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS 123R.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2006, our Company held unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $1.0 million compared to approximately $4.4 million as of January 1, 2006. This
decrease reflects the use of approximately $9.3 million for the repurchase of common stock,
including commissions, purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements of $8.2 million,
and early repayment of debt of $3.0 million partially offset by cash generated from operations of
approximately $15.5 million.
Our quick ratio, which measures our immediate short-term liquidity, was 0.37 at December 31,
2006 compared to 0.78 at January 1, 2006. The quick ratio is computed by adding unrestricted cash
and cash equivalents with accounts receivable, net and dividing by total current liabilities less
restricted marketing fund liabilities. The change in our quick ratio was primarily due to cash
used during the second half of fiscal 2006 for the repurchase of common stock and capital
expenditures for new restaurants.
Net cash provided by operations for each of the last three fiscal years was approximately
$15.5 million in fiscal 2006, $10.4 million in fiscal 2005, and $11.4 million in fiscal 2004. Cash
generated in fiscal 2006 was primarily from net income of approximately $4.9 million, depreciation
and amortization of approximately $4.4 million, the utilization of our deferred tax asset of
approximately $1.6 million, an increase in stock-based compensation of approximately $1.4 million,
a $1.2 million increase in accrued compensation and benefits, an asset impairment of $1.2 million
related to two company-owned locations, an increase in accounts payable of approximately $1.0
million and an increase in deferred rent of approximately $503,000 due to our new corporate
restaurants which opened in fiscal 2006. These increases were partially offset by an increase in
accounts receivable of approximately $672,000 due to a net 16 more franchisees since last year-end.
38
Cash generated in fiscal 2005 was primarily from net income of approximately $4.4 million,
depreciation and amortization of approximately $4.4 million, the utilization of our deferred tax
asset of approximately $2.0 million, and increase in deferred rent of approximately $813,000 due to
our new corporate office and Chantilly, Virginia restaurant opening, an increase in other current
liabilities of approximately $771,000 and an increase in stock-based compensation of approximately
$567,000. These increases were partially offset by an approximate $1.2 million increase in
restricted cash, which includes amounts related to our national advertising fund, approximately
$528,000 related to our self-funded benefit plans, an increase in accounts receivable of
approximately $1.1 million due to a net 22 more franchisees since last year-end, and a net increase
in prepaids and other current assets of approximately $444,000.
Cash provided by operations in fiscal 2004 was approximately $11.4 million is primarily the
result of an increase of depreciation and amortization of approximately $4.5 million, net income
from operations of approximately $3.5 million, an increase of approximately $2.1 million in
accounts payable, utilization of our deferred tax asset of approximately $1.4 million, an increase
in accrued compensation and benefits of approximately $594,000, and an increase in deferred rent of
approximately $474,000. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $1.1
million in other current liabilities, and approximate $628,000 increase in accounts receivable due
to franchise growth, and an increase of approximately $566,000 in prepaid and other current assets.
Net cash used for investing activities for each of the last three fiscal years was
approximately $7.0 million in fiscal 2006, $5.7 million in fiscal 2005, and $2.2 million in fiscal
2004. In fiscal 2006, we used approximately $8.2 million for the construction of our Waldorf,
Maryland and Coon Rapids, Minnesota restaurants and other infrastructure projects. This was
partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment of approximately
$900,000. In fiscal 2005, we used approximately $6.8 million for capital expenditures related to
the construction of our new Chantilly, Virginia restaurant, the purchase of our Plymouth, Minnesota
restaurant, the purchase of land for a restaurant in Coon Rapids, Minnesota, a new test kitchen,
training center and office space, and POS and other computer equipment for use in the restaurants
and at our corporate office. This was partially offset by proceeds
from the sale of assets of approximately $636,000, and payments received on notes receivable of
approximately $457,000. In fiscal 2004, we used approximately $2.4 million for capital
expenditures related to new catering vehicles, kitchen equipment, development of our site-model
tool, and POS and other computer equipment for use in the restaurants and at our corporate office.
In fiscal 2007, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately $15.0 million, which will
consist of five new ground-up company-owned restaurants, a new labor-scheduling and
back-of-the-house management system, reimages of existing restaurants and normal capital
expenditures for existing restaurants.
Net cash used for financing activities was approximately $11.9 million in fiscal 2006, $11.5
million in fiscal 2005, and $8.0 million in fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2006, we repurchased
611,430 shares of our common stock under our third share repurchase program, and paid approximately
$9.3 million, including commissions. We also repaid $3.0 million of long-term debt early along
with normal payments of an additional $447,000. We also received approximately $450,000 from the
exercise of stock options and realized a tax benefit of $469,000 for stock options exercised.
During fiscal 2005, we completed our 1.0 million share authorization and bought back the remaining
954,900 shares of our common stock and paid approximately $11.5 million, including commissions.
Other uses of cash for fiscal 2005 included payments on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations of approximately $606,000. This was partially offset by approximately $730,000 in
proceeds from the exercise of stock options. During fiscal 2004, we bought back approximately 1.0
million shares of our common stock and paid approximately $7.5 million, including commissions. In
addition, the Board of Directors authorized a second share repurchase program in November 2004, and
we bought back 44,100 shares in the last two months of the fiscal year for approximately $400,000.
Other uses of cash for fiscal 2004 included payments of long-term
debt and capital leases of approximately $726,000. Other sources of cash for fiscal 2004 included proceeds
received from the exercise of stock options and warrants of approximately $770,000.
39
On July 31, 2006, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively known as the
Borrower) entered into an amendment and restatement of an existing Credit Agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and lender (the Lender). The Credit
Agreement, which amended and restated an agreement previously entered into by the Company on
January 28, 2005, increased the Companys existing revolving credit facility from $10.0 Million to
$20.0 Million (the Facility). Principal amounts outstanding under the facility bear interest
either at an adjusted Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin or at Base Rate plus an applicable
margin. The Base Rate is defined in the agreement as either the Federal Funds Rate (5.25% at
December 31, 2006) plus 0.5% or Wells Fargos prime rate (8.25% at December 31, 2006). The
applicable margin will depend on the Companys Adjusted Leverage Ratio, as defined, at the end of
the previous quarter and will range from 1.75% to 2.50% for Euro Dollar Rate Loans and from -0.25%
to +0.50% for Base Rate Loans. Unused portions of the Facility will be subject to an unused
Facility fee equal to either 0.25% or 0.375% of the unused portion, depending on the Companys
Adjusted Leverage Ratio. Our rate for the unused portion of the Facility as of December 31, 2006,
was 0.25%.
We expect to use any borrowings under the Credit Agreement for general working capital
purchases, as well as the repurchase of shares under our share repurchase authorization. Under the
Facility, the Borrower has granted the Lender a security interest in all current and future
personal property of the Borrower.
The Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of
this type, including limitations on the Borrower with respect to indebtedness, liens, investments,
distributions, mergers and acquisitions, dispositions of assets and transactions with affiliates of
the Borrower, among others. The Facility also includes various financial covenants. We were in
compliance with all covenants under both Facilities as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement currently provides for up to $3.0 million in letters
of credit to be used by the Company, with any amounts outstanding reducing our availability for
general corporate purchases, and also allows for the termination of the Facility by the Borrower
without penalty at any time after the second anniversary of the effective date. The maturity date
for this new Facility is July 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2006, we had no borrowings under this
Facility and had $500,000 in Letters of Credit required by our fiscal 2005 self-funded, insurance
program. This Letter of Credit reduced our borrowing capacity under the line as of December 31,
2006. We had no borrowings under the previous Facility as of January 1, 2006.
We anticipate that all restaurant development and expansion will be funded primarily through
currently held cash and cash equivalents, cash flow generated from operations, and from sources
such as our credit facility. We moved into new corporate office headquarters in Minnetonka,
Minnesota on July 25, 2005. Capital expenditures of approximately $739,000 were spent on the new
facility, including the construction of a new state-of-the-art test kitchen and training facility
in the lower-level of the office facility. The lease, which commenced in August 2005, is for
approximately 26,000 rentable square feet and is for a term of 97 months, plus two five-year
renewal options. The minimum rent commitment over the lease term is approximately $4.3 million. We
expect capital expenditures of approximately $15.0 million in 2007 for the construction of five new
ground-up restaurants, corporate infrastructure, and normal capital expenditures for existing
restaurants.
In addition to commitments we have related to our lease obligations, we also have required
payments on our outstanding debt. The following table provides aggregate information about our
contractual payment obligations and the periods in which payments are due:
40
Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Long Term Debt |
|
$ |
8,421 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
Financing Leases |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
92,984 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
4,336 |
|
|
|
71,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Sublease rental income |
|
|
(8,425 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(6,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
97,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
$ |
4,224 |
|
|
$ |
4,263 |
|
|
$ |
4,336 |
|
|
$ |
4,337 |
|
|
$ |
76,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes 8, 9 and 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for details of our contractual obligations.
Under the agreements governing our long-term debt obligations, we are subject to two main
financial covenants. We must maintain a 1.5 to 1.0 fixed charge coverage ratio and a 3.5 to 1.0
leverage ratio during each fiscal year. As of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, we were in
compliance with all of the covenants.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Income Taxes
At December 31, 2006, we had cumulative net operating loss carry-forwards for tax reporting
purposes of approximately $300,000 for federal purposes and $5.0 million for state purposes,
respectively, which if not used will begin to expire in fiscal 2019. These will be adjusted when
we file our fiscal 2006 income tax returns in 2007. In addition, we had cumulative tax credit
carry-forwards of approximately $3.1 million, which if not used, will begin to expire in fiscal
2009.
Inflation
The primary inflationary factors affecting our operations include food, beverage, and labor
costs. In addition, our leases require us to pay taxes, maintenance, repairs and utilities and
these costs are subject to inflationary increases. We are also subject to interest rate changes
based on market conditions.
We believe that relatively low inflation rates have contributed to relatively stable costs.
There is no assurance, however, that low inflation rates will continue.
41
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and long-term debt. Our
Company includes as unrestrictive cash and cash equivalents investments with original maturities of
three months or less when purchased and which are readily convertible into known amounts of cash.
Our Companys unrestricted cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate
risk due to the short maturities of these instruments. We have no derivative financial instruments
or derivative commodity instruments in our cash and cash equivalents. The total outstanding
long-term debt of our Company as of December 31, 2006 was approximately $12.6 million, including
financing lease obligations. Of the outstanding long-term debt, approximately $1.0 million consists
of a variable interest rate while the remainder was subject to a fixed interest rate. On July 31,
2006, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively known as the Borrower) entered
into an amendment and restatement of an existing Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent and lender (the Lender). The Credit Agreement, which
amended and restated an agreement previously entered into by the Company on January 28, 2005,
increases the Companys existing revolving credit facility from $10.0 million to $20.0 million (the
Facility). Principal amounts outstanding under the facility will bear interest either at an
adjusted Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin or at Base Rate plus an applicable margin. The
Base Rate is defined in the agreement as either the Federal Funds Rate (5.25% at December 31, 2006)
plus 0.5% or Wells Fargos prime rate (8.25% at December 31, 2006). The applicable margin will
depend on the Companys Adjusted Leverage Ratio, as defined, at the end of the previous quarter and
will range from 1.75% to 2.50% for Euro Dollar Rate Loans and from -0.25% to +0.50% for Base Rate
Loans. Unused portions of the Facility will be subject to an unused Facility fee equal to either
0.375% or 0.25% of the unused portion, depending on the Companys Adjusted Leverage Ratio. Our rate
for the unused portion of the Facility as of December 31, 2006, was 0.25%. We do not see the
variable interest rate long-term debt as a significant interest rate risk. Some of the food
products purchased by us are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to price
volatility caused by weather, production problems, delivery difficulties and other factors that are
outside our control. To control this risk in part, we have fixed-priced purchase commitments for
food from vendors. In addition, we believe that substantially all of our food is available from
several sources, which helps to control food commodity risks. We believe we have the ability to
increase menu prices, or vary the menu options offered, if needed, in response to a food product
price increase.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements of Famous Daves of America, Inc. are included herein,
beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
42
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, our
internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. Our independent
registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP, has issued an audit report on our assessment
of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most
recently-completed fiscal quarter, and year ended December 31, 2006 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors
and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Famous Daves of America have been
detected.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
43
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive
proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this form 10-K. The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics specifically applicable
to its CEO, CFO and Controller. In addition, there is a more general Code of Ethics applicable to
all Associates. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.famousdaves.com and a copy
is available free of charge to anyone requesting it.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive
proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this form 10-K.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive
proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this form 10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive
proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this form 10-K.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item appears in our definitive proxy statement for our fiscal
2006 annual meeting of shareholders under the captions Fees Billed to Company by Its Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm and Pre-approval Policy, which information is incorporated
herein by reference.
44
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
Documents filed as part of this Form 10-K: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See exhibit index on the page following the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes |
|
|
|
|
45
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Famous Daves of America, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Famous Daves of America, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Famous Daves of America, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payments (SFAS 123R) effective January
2, 2006.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedule II of the Company is presented for purposes
of complying with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not a required part of
the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Famous Daves of America, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 9, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 9, 2007
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Famous Daves of America, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that Famous Daves of America,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Famous Daves of America, Inc. maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued
by COSO. Also, in our opinion, Famous Daves of America, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Famous Daves of America, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006 and our report dated March 9, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 9, 2007
F-2
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND JANUARY 1, 2006
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
3,337 |
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
|
15,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
50,037 |
|
|
|
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable, less current portion |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
Deferred tax asset, less current portion |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,642 |
|
|
$ |
67,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
3,811 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
12,807 |
|
|
|
9,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
11,430 |
|
Financing leases |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
29,807 |
|
|
|
29,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 10,130,000 and 10,599,000 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and January 1,
2006, respectively |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
32,863 |
|
|
|
39,835 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
35,835 |
|
|
|
37,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,642 |
|
|
$ |
67,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006, JANUARY 1, 2006 AND JANUARY 2, 2005
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(52 weeks) |
|
|
(52 weeks) |
|
|
(53 weeks) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurant sales, net |
|
$ |
100,026 |
|
|
$ |
89,248 |
|
|
$ |
89,176 |
|
Franchise royalty revenue |
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
10,406 |
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
Franchise fee revenue |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Licensing and other revenue |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
116,621 |
|
|
|
102,354 |
|
|
|
99,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food and beverage costs |
|
|
30,403 |
|
|
|
27,297 |
|
|
|
27,995 |
|
Labor and benefits |
|
|
29,960 |
|
|
|
26,151 |
|
|
|
26,472 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
25,311 |
|
|
|
22,339 |
|
|
|
22,005 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
4,549 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
15,381 |
|
|
|
13,430 |
|
|
|
10,939 |
|
Asset impairment and estimated
lease termination and
other closing costs |
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-opening expenses |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
107,378 |
|
|
|
93,619 |
|
|
|
91,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9,243 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
7,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,768 |
) |
|
|
(1,932 |
) |
|
|
(1,901 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,644 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
7,091 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(2,720 |
) |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic |
|
|
10,453,000 |
|
|
|
10,825,000 |
|
|
|
11,858,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted |
|
|
10,801,000 |
|
|
|
11,173,000 |
|
|
|
12,222,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006, JANUARY 1, 2006 AND JANUARY 2, 2005
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Earnings/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance December 28, 2003 |
|
|
12,158 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
56,692 |
|
|
$ |
(9,942 |
) |
|
$ |
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
Tax benefit for stock
options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Exercise of warrants |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Purchased rights to
exercisable warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Repurchase of common
stock and common stock
warrants |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(7,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,903 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 2, 2005 |
|
|
11,340 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
49,816 |
|
|
|
(6,444 |
) |
|
|
43,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730 |
|
Tax benefit for stock
options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(11,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,529 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2006 |
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
39,835 |
|
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
37,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
Tax benefit for stock
options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(9,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,309 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
32,863 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
35,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006, JANUARY 1, 2006 AND JANUARY 2, 2005
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(52 weeks) |
|
|
(52 weeks) |
|
|
(53 weeks) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows
provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
4,549 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
383 |
|
Asset impairment and estimated lease termination
and other closing costs |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock-options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(1,182 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(566 |
) |
Deposits |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
2,103 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operations |
|
|
15,524 |
|
|
|
10,391 |
|
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and leasehold
improvements |
|
|
(8,159 |
) |
|
|
(6,754 |
) |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
Sale of property, equipment and leasehold
improvements |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments received on notes receivable |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used for investing activities |
|
|
(7,014 |
) |
|
|
(5,661 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations |
|
|
(3,447 |
) |
|
|
(606 |
) |
|
|
(726 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Tax benefit of stock-options exercised |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(9,309 |
) |
|
|
(11,529 |
) |
|
|
(7,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used for financing activities |
|
|
(11,871 |
) |
|
|
(11,490 |
) |
|
|
(7,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,361 |
) |
|
|
(6,760 |
) |
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
4,410 |
|
|
|
11,170 |
|
|
|
9,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
|
$ |
11,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Nature of business We, Famous Daves of America, Inc. (Famous Daves or the Company),
were incorporated in Minnesota on March 14, 1994. We develop, own, operate and franchise
restaurants under the name Famous Daves. As of December 31, 2006, there were 145 restaurants
operating in 35 states, including 41 company-owned restaurants and 104 franchise-operated
restaurants. An additional 162 franchise restaurants were committed to be developed through signed
area development agreements at December 31, 2006.
Principles of consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Any inter-company
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Managements use of estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform
to the current years presentation.
Financial instruments Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of our current
financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair value. The fair value of long-term debt
approximates the carrying amount based upon our expected borrowing rate for debt with similar
remaining maturities and comparable risk.
Segment reporting We have company-owned and franchise-operated restaurants in the United
States, and operate within the single industry segment of foodservice. Because we manage
company-owned and franchise-operated restaurants in a similar manner and allocate resources to each
based upon their relative size to the Company we have aggregated our operating segments into a
single reporting segment.
Fiscal year Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest December 31st of each year. Our
fiscal year is generally 52 weeks; however it periodically consists of 53 weeks. The fiscal years
ended December 31, 2006 (fiscal 2006) and January 1, 2006 (fiscal 2005) were 52 weeks, while fiscal
year ending January 2, 2005 (fiscal 2004) was 53 weeks.
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents Cash equivalents include all investments with
original maturities of three months or less or which are readily convertible into known amounts of
cash and are not legally restricted. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000, while the remaining balances are uninsured at
December 31, 2006. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is
not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable, net We provide an allowance for uncollectible accounts on accounts
receivable. The allowance for uncollectible accounts was approximately $14,000 and $37,000 at
December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, respectively. We believe all accounts receivable in excess
of the allowance are fully collectible. If accounts receivable in excess of the provided allowance
are determined uncollectible, they are charged to expense in the year that determination is made.
Accounts receivable are written off when they become uncollectible, and
F-7
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
payments subsequently
received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Account receivable balances
written off have not exceeded allowances provided.
Inventories Inventories consist principally of food, beverages, retail goods, smallwares and
supplies, and are recorded at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net Property, equipment and leasehold
improvements are capitalized at a level of $250 or greater and are recorded at cost. Repair and
maintenance costs are charged to operations when incurred. Furniture, fixtures, equipment and
decor are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 3-7
years, while buildings are depreciated over 30 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using
the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term, including renewal options, or the
estimated useful life of the assets. Décor used in the restaurants is recorded at cost and is
depreciated using the straight-line method over seven years.
Debt issuance costs Debt issuance costs are amortized to interest expense over the term of
the related financing on a straight-line basis, which approximates the interest method. In the
event of early debt re-payment, the capitalized debt issuance costs are written-off to other
expense as a loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Construction overhead and capitalized interest We capitalize construction overhead costs at
the time a building is turned over to operations, which is approximately two weeks prior to
opening. We capitalized construction overhead costs of approximately $78,000 and $48,000 in fiscal
2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. There was no capitalized interest in fiscal years 2006, 2005
or 2004, respectively.
Advertising costs Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred. Advertising costs
were approximately $5.3 million, $3.0 million and $2.7 million for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004
respectively, and are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
Software implementation costs We capitalize labor costs associated with the implementation
of significant information technology infrastructure projects. This is based on actual labor rates
per person including benefits, for all the time spent in the implementation of the software in
accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. In fiscal 2006, we recorded approximately
$193,000 in unamortized software implementation costs. There were no software implementation costs
in either fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2004.
Research and development costs Research and development costs represent salaries and
expenses of personnel engaged in the creation of new menu and Limited-Time Offering (LTO) items,
recipe enhancements and documentation activities. Research and development costs were
approximately $292,000, $265,000, and $210,000 for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Pre-opening expenses All start-up and pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred. We had
pre- opening expenses of approximately $625,000 in fiscal 2006 related to three new corporate
restaurants that opened in 2006, and $96,000 in fiscal 2005 related to the conversion of a
counter-service restaurant to a full-service restaurant and one new corporate restaurant that was
preparing to open in early 2006. Included in pre-opening expenses is pre-opening rent during the
build-out period. We had no pre-opening expenses in fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2004.
F-8
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Lease Accounting In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
13, Accounting for Leases, we recognize lease expense for our operating leases over the entire
lease term including lease renewal options and build-out periods where the renewal is certain and
the build-out period takes place prior to the restaurant opening or lease commencement date. Rent
expense recorded during the build-out period is reported as pre-opening expense. We account for
construction allowances by recording a receivable when its collectibility is considered certain,
amortizing the leasehold improvements over the lesser of their useful lives or the full term of the
lease, including renewal options and build-out periods, amortizing the construction allowance as a
credit to rent expense over the full term of the lease, including renewal options and build-out
periods, and relieving the receivable once the cash is obtained from the landlord for the
construction allowance.
Recoverability of property, equipment and leasehold improvements In accordance with SFAS No.
144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate restaurant sites
and long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of restaurant sites to be held
and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the restaurant site to the
undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. If
a restaurant is determined to be impaired the loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying
amount of the restaurant exceeds its fair value. Fair value as determined by the discounted future
net cash flows, is estimated based on the best information available including estimated future
cash flows, expected growth rates in comparable restaurant sales, remaining lease terms and other
factors. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to take additional
impairment charges for the related assets. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
estimate future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from the
estimates.
Our December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006 consolidated balance sheets reflect approximately
$4.7 million and $1.3 million of assets held for sale respectively, which at December 31, 2006
included three company restaurants being marketed to potential franchisees.
Our January 1, 2006 consolidated balance sheet reflected approximately $1.3 million of assets
held for sale, which included the land and building for one location that was closed during 2003.
In June 2006, we recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $282,000 on these assets to
reflect them at their fair market value, based on a pending sale. On December 29, 2006, the
Company sold its interest in this property for $1.0 million resulting in net proceeds of $900,000
after real estate taxes and broker commissions.
During fiscal 2006, we also recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $502,000
during the second quarter for an underperforming company-owned restaurant in the Chicago, IL market
that closed on July 28, 2006. This impairment charge reflected the non-cash write-down of the net
book value of the assets at that restaurant. In the third quarter, we recorded an additional charge
of approximately $332,000, which included estimated lease termination costs, net of deferred rent,
and other closure costs. In the fourth quarter, we recorded an additional $20,000 for miscellaneous
costs. We currently sublease the real property on which the closed restaurant is located under a
lease that expires in November 2010. We are currently marketing this location for sublease. There
were no impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2004.
F-9
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Public Relations and Marketing Development Fund Beginning in fiscal 2004, we established a
system-wide Public Relations and Marketing Development Fund. Company-owned restaurants, in
addition to franchise-operated restaurants on which franchise agreements were signed after January
1, 2004, are required to contribute a percentage of net sales, currently 1.0%, to the fund that is
used for Public Relations and Marketing Development Fund efforts throughout the system.
Additionally, certain payments received from various vendors are deposited into the public
relations and marketing fund. The assets held by this fund are considered restricted.
Accordingly, we reflected the cash related to this fund in restricted cash and the liability is
included in accounts payable on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and January
1, 2006. As of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, we had approximately $1.4 million and
$693,000 in this fund, respectively.
Restricted Cash Restricted cash balances as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006 were
approximately $1.4 and $1.2 million, respectively, consisting of the unused balance of cash
payments received from franchise-operated and company-owned restaurants for the Public Relations
and Marketing Development Fund. At January 1, 2006, restricted cash also included funding related
to a letter of credit as required by our self-funded insurance programs. The letter of credit was
established as of July 1, 2005, and was funded by a restricted interest-bearing cash account in the
amount of approximately $528,000. In fiscal 2006, the cash deposit was allocated to a letter of
credit for the Companys fiscal 2005 self-funded medical insurance plan.
Gift Cards We record a liability in the period in which a gift card is issued and proceeds
are received. As gift cards are redeemed, this liability is reduced and revenue is recognized. We
recognize gift card slippage income based on a stratified breakage rate per year when the
likelihood of the redemption of the card becomes remote.
Interest income We recognize interest income as earned.
Net income per common share Basic net income per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period.
Diluted EPS equals net income divided by the sum of the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding plus all additional common stock equivalents relating to stock options and
warrants when dilutive.
F-10
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,453 |
|
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
11,858 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,453 |
|
|
|
10,825 |
|
|
|
11,858 |
|
Dilutive impact of common stock equivalents outstanding |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
10,801 |
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006 were used in the
computation of diluted EPS for fiscal years 2006 and 2005.
Options to purchase approximately 40,000 shares of common stock with a weighted average
exercise price of $8.02 were excluded from the fiscal 2004 diluted EPS computation because the
exercise price exceeded the average market price of the common shares during the period.
Stock-based Compensation On January 2, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004) Share-Based
Payment, which requires us to recognize compensation cost for share-based awards granted to
Associates based on their fair values at the time of grant over the requisite service period. Our
pre-tax compensation cost for stock options as reflected in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations is included in general and administrative expenses. For fiscal year 2006, compensation
cost for stock options was approximately $378,000 (approximately $244,000 net of tax).
As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, our income from operations, net income and basic
and diluted net income per common share for fiscal year 2006 were lower by $378,000, $244,000 and
$0.02 and $0.02, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately $449,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized
over a period of approximately 2.5 years.
F-11
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we accounted for stock-based compensation awards using
the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Associates. Accordingly, we did not recognize compensation expense in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations for options that were granted that had an exercise price
equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. As
required by SFAS No. 123, we provided certain pro forma disclosures for stock-based awards as if
the fair-value-based approach of SFAS No. 123 had been applied.
We elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123R and
therefore did not restate our financial results for prior periods. Under this transition method,
we apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123R to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled after January 1, 2006. These awards of stock options qualify for equity-based treatment
under SFAS No. 123R. Additionally, we recognize compensation cost for the portion of awards that
were outstanding as of January 1, 2006 for which the requisite service has not been rendered
(unvested awards) over the remaining service period. The compensation cost that we record for
these awards is based on their grant-date fair value as calculated for the pro forma disclosures
required by SFAS No. 123. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value all option
grants.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, we presented all tax benefits resulting from the
exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
SFAS No. 123R requires that cash flows from the exercise of stock options resulting from tax
benefits in excess of recognized cumulative compensation cost (excess tax benefits) be classified
as financing cash flows.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per common share as if
we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based awards for
fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,498 |
|
Less: Compensation expense determined
under the fair value method, net of tax |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
3,966 |
|
|
$ |
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS as reported |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Basic EPS pro forma |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS as reported |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Diluted EPS pro forma |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
There were no stock options granted during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on
the date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) exercised during fiscal 2006 was
approximately $1.4 million.
As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was
approximately $8.2 million and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was
approximately $6.6 million.
F-12
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Revenue Recognition We record restaurant sales at the time food and beverages are served.
We record sales of merchandise items at the time items are delivered to the customer. We have
detailed below our revenue recognition policies for franchise and licensing agreements.
Franchise arrangements Our franchise-related revenue consists of area development fees,
initial franchise fees and continuing royalty payments. Our area development fee consists of a
one-time, non-refundable payment equal to $10,000 per restaurant in consideration for the services
we perform in preparation of executing each area development agreement. Substantially all of these
services which include, but are not limited to, conducting market and trade area analysis, a
meeting with Famous Daves Executive Team, and performing potential franchise background
investigation, all of which are completed prior to our execution of the area development agreement
and receipt of the corresponding area development fee. As a result, we recognize this fee in full
upon receipt. Our initial franchise fee is typically $40,000 per restaurant, of which $5,000 is
recognized immediately when a franchise agreement is signed, reflecting the commission earned and
expenses incurred related to the sale. The remaining $35,000 is included in deferred franchise
fees and is recognized as revenue, at which time we have performed substantially all of our
obligations. The franchise agreement represents a separate and distinct earnings process from the
area development agreements. Franchisees are also required to pay us a monthly royalty equal to a
percentage of their net sales, which has historically varied from 4% to 5%. Currently, new
franchises pay us a monthly royalty of 5% of their net sales.
Licensing and other revenue We have a licensing agreement for our retail products, the
initial term of which expires in April 2010 with renewal options of five years, subject to the
licensees attainment of identified minimum product sales levels. Licensing revenue for fiscal
years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $279,000, $285,000 and $248,000, respectively.
Periodically, we provide additional services, beyond the general franchise agreement, to our
franchise operations, such as new restaurant training and décor installation services. The cost of
these services is billed to the respective franchisee and is generally payable on net 30-day terms.
Other revenue related to these services for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was approximately
$695,000, $820,000 and $571,000, respectively.
Variable Interest Entities In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities which
was subsequently revised by FIN 46R in December 2003. This Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, addresses consolidation by business enterprises
of variable interest entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entitys expected
losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both, as a result of
ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the entity. The Interpretation requires that
if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the
assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity must be included
in the consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. The Company adopted
FIN 46R effective January 1, 2004.
F-13
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
The Company is a franchisor of 104 franchise-operated restaurants as of December 31, 2006, but
does not possess any ownership interests in its franchisees and does not provide financial support
to franchisees in its typical franchise relationship. Franchisees are responsible for making their
own decisions regarding day-to-day operations of the franchise. These franchise
relationships were not deemed variable interests, and the entities were not consolidated upon
adoption of FIN 46.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued FASB
Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option established by
Statement 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates. Statement 159 is effective for the company as of December 31, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact this pronouncement will have on our consolidated statement of
financial position.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements which is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years.
This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
the related disclosure requirements. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this
statement on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB 108 was issued to provide consistency between how registrants quantify financial
statement misstatements.
Historically, there have been two widely-used methods for quantifying the effects of financial
statement misstatements. These methods are referred to as the roll-over and iron curtain
methods. The roll-over method quantifies the amount by which the current year income statement is
misstated. The iron curtain method quantifies the error as the cumulative amount by which the
current year balance sheet is misstated. SAB 108 established an approach that requires
quantification of financial statement misstatements based on the effects of the misstatement on
each of the companys financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. This
approach is commonly referred to as the dual approach.
SAB 108 allows registrants to initially apply the dual approach either by (1) retroactively
adjusting prior financial statements as if the dual approach had always been used or by (2)
recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the dual approach as adjustments to the
carrying values of assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment
recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. We have adopted SAB 108 using the cumulative
effect transition method in connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements for
the year ending December 31, 2006.
F-14
AMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(1) |
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation clarifies the application
of FASB Statement No. 109 by defining a criterion that an individual tax position must meet for any
part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprises financial statements.
Additionally, this Interpretation provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The
Interpretation will be effective for us at the beginning of fiscal 2007. We have evaluated the
impact and have determined that the adoption of FIN No. 48 will not be material to our
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP No. 123R-3, Transition Election Related
to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3). The Company has
elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in FSP 123 R-3 for calculating the tax
effect of stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123R. The alternative transition method includes
simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in-capital pool (APIC
pool) related to the tax effects of stock-based compensation, and for determining the subsequent
impact on the APIC pool and consolidated statement of cash flows of the tax effects of stock-based
compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS
No. 123R.
Inventories consisted approximately of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Smallwares and supplies |
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,015 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
Retail goods |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
|
$ |
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Notes receivable consisted approximately of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Famous Ribs of Georgia, LLC, Famous
Ribs of Snellville, LLC, Famous Ribs
of Marietta, LLC, Famous Ribs of
Alpharetta, LLC, and Famous Ribs of
Lawrenceville, LLC, $1,300 amortized
over 9 years at 3.27% interest, due
November 2012, secured by property
and equipment and guaranteed by the
franchise owner. Monthly interest
only was due until December 2006,
when principal payments were
required. Under the note agreement,
Decembers note payment was
appropriately deferred. (See Note
(18) Subsequent Events for discussion
regarding amendment of note). |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old School BBQ, Inc. monthly
installments of approximately $5.7
including interest at 9.0%, due
November 2012, secured by property
and equipment and guaranteed by the
franchise owners. |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah BBQ, Inc. monthly installments
of approximately $0.9 and $8.6
including interest at 9.5%, due July
2007, secured by property and
equipment and guaranteed by the
franchise owners. |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivervalley BBQ, Inc. quarterly
interest and principal installments
of approximately $22.0 including
interest at prime (6.25% at January
1, 2006) plus 1.50%, paid when due
December 2006, unsecured. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivervalley BBQ, Inc. line of
credit for up to $50.0 with monthly
interest only though December 2007
with total outstanding balance due
December 2007 including interest at
prime (8.25% at December 31, 2006 and
6.25% at January 1, 2006) plus 1.50%,
unsecured. |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition BBQ, Inc. monthly
installments of approximately $0.4
including interest at 7.0%, due
January 2008, unsecured. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes receivable |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of notes receivable |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(3) |
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE (continued) |
Future principal payments to be received on notes receivable are approximately as follows:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
544 |
|
2008 |
|
|
76 |
|
2009 |
|
|
88 |
|
2010 |
|
|
87 |
|
2011 |
|
|
94 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted approximately of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Prepaids |
|
$ |
1,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
Acquisition of Florence, Kentucky restaurant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
785 |
|
Notes receivable short-term |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Florence, Kentucky Restaurant
On May 11, 2005, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with a franchisee and its lender
pursuant to which we would acquire from the franchisee the assets comprising a franchise-operated
location in Florence, Kentucky for a purchase price of approximately $790,000, payable in part by
forgiveness of amounts due to us from the franchisee. Our ultimate basis in the acquired assets
would include the purchase price plus the related expenses incurred by us in connection with this
acquisition, including bankruptcy-related costs. Because the franchisee had filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, consummation of the
transaction was contingent upon, among other things, approval by the United States Bankruptcy
Court. The transaction was scheduled to close subject to the satisfaction of applicable closing
conditions upon the issuance of a final and non-appealable approval order from the Court.
Subject to consummation of the transaction, we believed the amounts to be recovered from the
franchisee could be fully realized and, as a result, as of April 3, 2005 we reclassified $508,000
from accounts receivable to other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet. As of April
2005, we had realized approximately $277,000 in additional expenses related
to this transaction, and, accordingly, have reflected approximately $785,000 in other current
assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2006.
F-17
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS (continued)
On January 20, 2006 the Court approved the sale of the Florence, Kentucky restaurant to us.
On January 23, 2006, the Company acquired the assets comprising our Florence, Kentucky
franchise-operated location from Best Que, LLC, the former franchise operator. The acquisition
costs to date for the assets were approximately $972,000, which were comprised of a cash payment of
$155,000 plus the forgiveness and cancellation of certain debts owed by the Seller to the Company
and the expenditure of certain fees and expense including legal and other professional fees in
connection with the sale. The restaurant is currently being marketed to potential franchisees, and
will be operated as a company-owned property until the assets are sold to a new franchise operator.
The assets acquired in fiscal 2006 are accounted for as assets held for sale within property,
equipment and leasehold improvements, net, in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2006.
(5) PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, NET
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net, consisted approximately of the following
at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
48,619 |
|
|
$ |
46,292 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
21,679 |
|
|
|
21,488 |
|
Antiques |
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(28,673 |
) |
|
|
(27,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
$ |
50,037 |
|
|
$ |
46,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We moved into new corporate office headquarters in Minnetonka, Minnesota on July 25,
2005. Capital expenditures of approximately $739,000 were spent on the new facility, including the
construction of a new test kitchen and training facility in the lower-level of the office facility.
(6) OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other current liabilities consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Gift cards payable |
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Sales tax payable |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
Accrued property and equipment purchases |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Deferred franchise fees |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(7) CREDIT FACILITY AND DEBT COVENANTS
On July 31, 2006, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively known as the
Borrower) entered into an amendment and restatement of an existing Credit Agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and lender (the Lender). The Credit
Agreement, which amended and restated an agreement previously entered into by the Company on
January 28, 2005, increased the Companys existing revolving credit facility from $10.0 million to
$20.0 million (the Facility). Principal amounts outstanding under the Facility will bear
interest either at an adjusted Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin or at a Base Rate plus an
applicable margin. The Base Rate is defined in the agreement as either the Federal Funds Rate
(5.25% at December 31, 2006) plus 0.5% or Wells Fargos prime rate (8.25% at December 31, 2006).
The applicable margin will depend on the Companys Adjusted Leverage Ratio, as defined, at the end
of the previous quarter and will range from 1.75% to 2.50% for Euro Dollar Rate Loans and from
-0.25% to +0.50% for Base Rate loans. Unused portions of the Facility will be subject to an unused
Facility fee equal to either 0.25% or 0.375% of the unused portion, depending on the Companys
Adjusted Leverage Ratio. Our rate for the unused portion of the Facility as of December 31, 2006,
was 0.25%.
The Company expects to use borrowings under the Credit Agreement for general working capital
purposes, as well as for the repurchase of shares under the Companys share repurchase
authorization. Under the Facility, the Borrower has granted the Lender a security interest in all
current and future personal property of the Borrower.
The Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of
this type, including limitations on the Borrower with respect to indebtedness, liens, investments,
distributions, mergers and acquisitions, dispositions of assets and transactions with affiliates of
the Borrower, among others. The Facility also includes various financial covenants. We were in
compliance with all covenants under the Facilities as of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006.
In addition to changes in the aggregate loan amount and applicable interest rates, the Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement provides for up to $3.0 million in letters of credit to be used by
the Company, with any amounts outstanding, reducing our availability
for general corporate purposes and also allows
for the termination of the Facility by the Borrower without penalty at any time after the
second anniversary of the effective date. The maturity date for this new Facility is July 31,
2011. We had no
borrowings under this Facility, and had $500,000 in Letters of Credit as of December 31, 2006 as
required by our fiscal 2005 self-funded medical insurance policy. This letter of credit reduced
our borrowing capacity under the line as of December 31, 2006. We had no borrowings under the
previous Facility as of January 1, 2006.
(8) LONG-TERM DEBT
Under the agreements governing our long-term debt obligations, we are subject to two main
financial covenants. We must maintain a 1.25 to 1.0 fixed charge coverage ratio and a 3.5 to 1.0
leverage ratio during each fiscal year. As of December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2006, we were in
compliance with all of our covenants.
F-19
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(8) LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)
Long-term debt consisted approximately of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Notes payable GE Capital Franchise
Finance Corporation monthly
installments from approximately $13 to
$20 including interest between 8.10%
and 10.53%, due between January 2020
and October 2023, secured by property
and equipment. |
|
$ |
7,416 |
|
|
$ |
10,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable GE Capital Franchise
Finance Corporation monthly
installment of approximately $12
including interest of 3.80% plus the
monthly LIBOR rate (effective rate
between 4.57% and 5.33% at December 31,
2006 and between 2.59% and 4.39% at
January 1, 2006), due December 2017,
secured by property and equipment. |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
11,852 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt net of current maturities |
|
$ |
8,119 |
|
|
$ |
11,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required principal payments on long-term debt over the next five years, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
302 |
|
2008 |
|
|
331 |
|
2009 |
|
|
365 |
|
2010 |
|
|
401 |
|
2011 |
|
|
442 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
(9) FINANCING LEASE OBLIGATION
We have a $4.5 million financing obligation dated March 31, 1999, involving three existing
restaurants as a result of a sale/leaseback transaction. Under this financing, we are obligated to
make monthly interest payments of $46,454 (which increases 4.04% every two years) for a minimum of
20 years. At the end of the 20 year lease term we may extend the lease for up to two additional
five year terms. We also have the option to purchase the leased restaurants before the
10th and 12th anniversaries of the lease term and between the first and
second five year option terms. The option purchase price is the greater of $4.5 million or the fair
market value of the properties at the time the purchase option is exercised. Based upon our
continued involvement in the leased property and its purchase option, the transaction has been
accounted for as a financing arrangement. Accordingly, the three existing restaurants are included
in property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net and are being depreciated, and a portion of
the monthly payments are accounted for as interest expense in the consolidated statements of
operations. The principal financing lease obligation payment of $4.5 million is due in March 2019.
F-20
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(10) CAPITAL AND OPERATING LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Our assets under capital leases expired in February 2006. These leases consisted of agreements
for furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, and bore interest at a rate of 13.0%. The
obligations were secured by the property under lease. Total cost and accumulated amortization of
the capital-leased assets were approximately $4.3 million at both December 31, 2006 and January 1,
2006, respectively. We depreciated the capital lease amounts over their useful life as defined by
our capitalization policy.
We have various operating leases for existing and future restaurants and corporate office
space with remaining lease terms ranging from 1 to 40 years, including lease renewal options.
Eight of the leases require percentage rent of between 3% and 7% of annual gross sales, typically
above a natural breakeven point, in addition to the base rent. All of these leases contain
provisions for payments of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs. Total
occupancy lease costs for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 including rent, common area maintenance
costs, real estate taxes and percentage rent, were approximately $5.4 million, $4.9 million and
$4.8 million, respectively. Rent expenses only (excluding percentage rent) were approximately $3.7
million, $3.2 million and $3.0 million for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Percentage rent was approximately $179,000, $102,000 and $138,000 for fiscal years 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
On December 30, 2004 we signed a lease agreement with Liberty Property Limited Partnership,
and moved into new corporate office headquarters in Minnetonka, Minnesota on July 25, 2005. The
lease, which commenced in July 2005, is for approximately 26,000 rentable square feet, and is for a
term of 97 months, with two-five year renewal options. The minimum rent commitment over the lease
term is approximately $4.6 million.
We have three sublease arrangements with franchisees. These leases are our responsibility,
but we have offered them to our franchisees on substantially equal terms to the original leases.
These amounts are shown in the table below within the caption sublease income.
Future minimum lease payments (including renewal options) existing at December 31, 2006 were:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Leases |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
3,910 |
|
2008 |
|
|
4,333 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,339 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4,376 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,336 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
71,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease commitments |
|
$ |
92,984 |
|
Less: sublease income |
|
|
(8,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
84,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(11) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Stock Repurchase In fiscal 2004, we purchased 200,000 shares of stock from our founder and
former CEO, Dave Anderson, for approximately $1.6 million at a price equal to fair market value.
Famous Ribs of Georgia, Snellville, Marietta and Alpharetta, LLC In fiscal 2006, 2005, and
2004, we sublet three restaurants to our former President and CEO, Martin ODowd, for a total of
$380,000, $362,000 and $403,000, respectively, in lease and real estate tax payments for
which he reimbursed us an equal amount to offset our rent expense for these three locations. In
November 2003, we executed a signed purchase agreement with Mr. ODowd to purchase our three
Atlanta area restaurants and operate them under franchise agreements. As part of the purchase
price, we executed a signed note receivable in the amount of $1.3 million, with Mr. ODowd expected
to submit periodic principal and interest payments, to us, over 9 years. This note was interest
only until December 2006, at which time regular monthly principal and interest payments became due.
(See Note (18) Subsequent Events). The December payment was properly deferred. In addition, Mr.
ODowd entered into an area development agreement to develop additional Famous Daves franchise
restaurants in defined areas of Georgia, and transferred his rights to the North Carolina market
back to us.
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
AND WARRANTS
We have adopted
a 1995 Stock Option and Compensation Plan, a 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan,
a 1998 Director Stock Option Plan and a 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plans), pursuant to which we
may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, and other
stock and cash awards to eligible participants. We have also granted stock options outside of the
Plans prior to 1996 in limited situations. All of these grants have been previously exercised.
Under the Plans, an aggregate of 491,348 shares of our Companys common stock remained unreserved
and available for issuance at December 31, 2006. In general, the stock options we have issued
under the Plans vest over a period of 3 to 5 years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. The
1995 Stock Option and Compensation Plan expired on December 29, 2005, but will remain in effect
until all outstanding incentives granted hereunder have either been satisfied or terminated.
F-22
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
AND WARRANTS (continued)
Information regarding our Companys stock options is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(number of options in thousands) |
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Options outstanding December 28, 2003 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
Granted |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
Canceled or expired |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
3.43 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
3.26 |
|
Options previously cancelled |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding January 2, 2005 |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Granted |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
Canceled or expired |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
5.79 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
Canceled or expired |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
6.11 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
4.28 |
|
Options previously cancelled |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable January 2, 2005 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable January 1, 2006 |
|
|
539 |
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable December 31, 2006 |
|
|
580 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year ended January 2, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year ended January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.98 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-23
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE
REPURCHASES AND WARRANTS (continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31,
2006:
(number outstanding and number exercisable in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
Total outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
average |
|
prices |
|
outstanding |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
exercisable |
|
|
exercise price |
|
$2.00 - $ 2.38 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
2.66 years |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
$3.19 - $ 4.18 |
|
|
314 |
|
|
5.69 years |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
$4.82 - $ 6.72 |
|
|
358 |
|
|
6.89 years |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
$2.00 - $10.98 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
6.24 years |
|
|
|
9.97 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
9.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
6.24 years |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan
On May 12, 2005, the Companys shareholders approved the adoption of the Famous Daves of
America, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan). The purpose of the 2005 Plan is to
increase shareholder value and to advance the interests of the Company by furnishing a variety of
economic incentives designed to attract, retain and motivate Associates, certain key consultants
and directors of the Company. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may be issued
under the 2005 Plan is 450,000 shares, subject to adjustment. The Compensation Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors administers the 2005 Plan. Awards may be granted to Associates
(including officers), members of the Board of Directors and consultants or other independent
contractors. Awards that may be granted under the 2005 Plan include performance shares, incentive
and non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, and restricted stock.
The 2005 Plan shall remain in effect until all incentives granted under the 2005 Plan have either
been satisfied by the issuance of shares of common stock, the payment of cash, or have been
terminated under the terms of the 2005 Plan and all restrictions imposed on shares of common stock
in connection with their issuance under the 2005 Plan have lapsed. No incentives may be granted
under the 2005 Plan after the tenth anniversary of the date the 2005 Plan was approved by the
shareholders of the Company.
Performance Shares
During fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee determined that all stock incentive awards for
Associates of the Company, including officers, commencing in 2005, would take the form of
performance shares. These performance shares will take the place of the Companys historical
practice of issuing stock options as a form of stock incentive.
F-24
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
AND WARRANTS (continued)
We have a
program under which management and certain director-level Associates may be granted
performance shares under the 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan,
subject to certain contingencies. Issuance of the shares underlying the performance share grants
are contingent upon the Company achieving a specified minimum percentage of the cumulative earnings
per share goals (as determined by the Compensation Committee) for each of the three fiscal years
covered by the grant. Upon achieving the minimum percentage, and provided that the recipient
remains an Associate during the entire three-year performance period, the Company will issue the
recipient a percentage of the performance shares that is equal to the percentage of the cumulative
earnings per share goals achieved. No portion of the shares will be issued if the specified
percentage of earnings per share goals is achieved in any one or more fiscal years but not for the
cumulative three-year period.
No recipient will have any rights as a shareholder based on the performance share grants
unless and until the conditions have been satisfied and the shares have been issued to the
recipient. In accordance with this program, we recognize as compensation expense, the value of
these stock grants as they are earned in our consolidated statement of operations throughout the
performance period.
As of December 31, 2006, we have two performance share programs in progress. During fiscal
2006, we recorded expense related to three programs, one of which was completed as of December 31,
2006. On February 18, 2004 our Board of Directors awarded 33,500 (subsequently reduced to 27,500
due to Associate departures) performance share grants to eligible Associates for the fiscal
2004-fiscal 2006 timeframe. On February 25, 2005, our Board of Directors awarded 134,920
(subsequently reduced to 113,105 due to Associate departures) performance share grants to eligible
Associates for the fiscal 2005-fiscal 2007 timeframe. On December 29, 2005, our Board of Directors
awarded 83,200 performance (subsequently reduced to 72,300 due to Associate departures) share
grants to eligible Associates for the fiscal 2006-fiscal 2008 timeframe.
We recognized approximately $38,000, $90,000, and $142,000, respectively, of compensation
expense in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2006, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004,
respectively, related to the fiscal 2004-fiscal 2006 program. We recognized approximately $423,000
and $473,000 of compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2006
and fiscal 2005, related to the fiscal 2005-fiscal 2007 program. We recognized approximately
$271,000 and $3,000 of compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal
2006 and fiscal 2005, related to the fiscal 2006-fiscal 2008 program.
Deferred Stock Unit Plan
We have an Executive Elective Deferred Stock Unit Plan (Deferred Stock Unit Plan), in which
executives can elect to defer all or part of their compensation or commissions, if applicable, for
a specified period of time. The amount of compensation that is deferred is converted into a number
of stock units, as determined by the share price of our common stock on the date the annual bonuses
are approved by the Board of Directors. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, this plan qualifies for
liability treatment. Accordingly, we recognize compensation expense throughout the deferral period
to the extent
that the share price of our common stock increases, and reduce compensation expense
throughout the deferral period to the extent that the share price of our common stock decreases.
F-25
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
AND WARRANTS (continued)
In accordance with the plan discussed above, on February 18, 2004, David Goronkin, our
President and CEO, elected to defer his fiscal 2003 bonus of $93,750 for a one-year period related
to this plan. For fiscal 2004, we recognized approximately $68,000 in additional compensation
expense. Mr. Goronkins fiscal 2003 bonus, including the original amount deferred and the
appreciation, was paid to him during the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Several of our executives elected to defer a portion of their fiscal 2004 bonuses, the amount
of which was determined on February 25, 2005, totaling approximately $77,000, (of which
approximately $25,000 had been subsequently paid out), in accordance with the Deferred Stock Unit
Plan discussed above. Two executives deferred for a one-year period and two executives deferred
for a two-year period. As a result of our end-of-year stock price being essentially equal to the
stock price at the time of the election, we recognized no expense in our consolidated statements of
operations for fiscal 2005, related to this plan for the fiscal 2004 bonus year deferral. In fiscal
2006, we recognized compensation expense of approximately $24,000 in our consolidated statement of
operations, as related to the second year deferral of the fiscal 2004 bonus.
Several of our executives elected to defer for one year a portion of their fiscal 2005
bonuses, the amount of which was determined on February 22, 2006, totaling approximately $56,000
(of which approximately $9,000 had been subsequently paid out), in accordance with the Deferred
Stock Unit Plan discussed above. We recognized compensation expense of approximately $2,000 in our
consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2006, as related to this plan for the fiscal 2005
bonus year deferrals.
Common Share Repurchases
On May 12, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a program to repurchase up
to 1.0 million shares of our common stock. In September 2004, we completed the repurchase of these
1.0 million shares at a total price of approximately $7.5 million at an average market price of
$7.44, excluding commissions.
On November 2, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a second stock repurchase plan that
authorized the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares of our common stock to be repurchased from
time-to-time in both the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During fiscal
2004, we had purchased 45,100 outstanding shares under this program at an average price of $9.70,
excluding commissions. As of June 20, 2005 we had completed the repurchase of our 1.0 million
share repurchase program. The remaining 954,900 shares were purchased between January 2005 and June
2005 for approximately $11.5 million at an average market price of $11.93, excluding commissions.
On May 9, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a third stock repurchase program that
authorized the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares of our common stock to be repurchased from
time to time in both the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. As of December
31, 2006, we had repurchased 611,400 shares under the program for approximately $9.3 million at an
average market
price of $15.20, excluding commissions.
F-26
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(12) STOCK OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE SHARES, OTHER FORMS OF COMPENSATION, AND COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
AND WARRANTS (continued)
Board of Directors Compensation
In May 2006, in lieu of our previous program of issuing cash and stock options, we awarded our
independent board members shares of common stock for their service on our board for fiscal 2006.
These shares were fully vested upon grant and were unrestricted, but require reimbursement of the
prorated portion or equivalent value thereof in the event of a board member not fulfilling their
term of service. In total, 19,300 shares were issued on May 11, 2006, on which date the price of
our common stock at the close of market was $15.71. The compensation cost of approximately
$303,000 was reflected in general and administrative costs in our consolidated statement of
operations for fiscal 2006.
Warrants
As part of our acquisition of four restaurants during fiscal year 1999, we issued 200,000
warrants which were set to expire in December 2004. All stock warrants had been exercised or
redeemed prior to their expiration. During fiscal 2004, 10,000 of the warrants were exercised at a
price of $6.00 per share and we redeemed, but have not yet paid for, the remainder of the warrants
for approximately $197,000 which represents the difference between the original exercise price of
the warrants and the closing market price of the Companys stock on the date of the transactions.
We currently have a liability recorded for these warrants.
(13) INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2006, we had cumulative net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately
$289,000 for federal tax purposes and approximately $5.0 million for state tax purposes, which will
begin to expire in fiscal 2019 if not used. We also had cumulative tax credit carry-forwards of
approximately $3.1 million which, if not used, will begin to expire in fiscal 2009.
The following table summarizes the provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
State |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
State |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(13) INCOME TAXES (continued)
Deferred taxes, detailed below, recognize the impact of temporary differences between the
amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for financial statement purposes and such amounts
measured in accordance with tax laws. Realization of the net operating loss carry forwards and
other deferred tax temporary differences are contingent on future taxable earnings. During fiscal
years 2006 and 2005, our
deferred tax asset was reviewed for expected utilization using a more likely than not approach as
required by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by assessing the available positive and
negative evidence surrounding its recoverability. We believe that the realization of the deferred
tax asset is more likely than not based on our taxable income for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 and
based on the expectation that our Company will generate the necessary taxable income in future
years.
Our Companys deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
January 1, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit carryover |
|
$ |
3,057 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
Prepaids |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
3,234 |
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit carryovers |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,253 |
|
Property and equipment basis difference |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Other |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Tax effect of permanent differences |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Tax effect of tip credit |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(14) SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,698 |
|
|
$ |
1,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of other current
assets to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of accounts receivable
to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued property and equipment purchases |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset related to tax
benefit of stock options exercised |
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to independent
board members |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(15) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLANS
401(k) Plan
We have a pre-tax salary reduction/profit-sharing plan under the provisions of Section 401(k)
of the Internal Revenue Code, which covers Associates meeting certain eligibility requirements.
During fiscal 2006, we matched 50.0% of the Associates contribution up to 4.0% of their earnings.
Employer matching contributions were approximately $169,000, $148,000 and $118,000 for fiscal years
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. There were no discretionary contributions to the plan during
fiscal years 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We have a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 25, 2005 (the
Plan). Eligible participants are those Associates who are at the director level and above; and
who are selected by the Company to participate in the Plan. Participants must complete a deferral
election each year to indicate the level of compensation (salary, bonus and commissions) they wish
to have deferred for the coming year. This deferral election is irrevocable except to the extent
permitted by the Plan Administrator, and the Regulations promulgated by the IRS. The Company
currently matches 50.0% of the first 4.0% contributed and currently pays a declared interest rate
of 8.0% on balances outstanding. The Board of Directors administers the Plan and could change the
Company match or the rate or any other aspect of the Plan at any time.
F-29
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(15) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLANS (continued)
Deferral periods are defined as the earlier of termination of employment or not less than
three calendar years following the end of the applicable Plan Year. Extensions of the deferral
period for a minimum of five years are allowed provided the election is made at least one year
before the first payment affected by the change. Payments can be in a lump sum or in equal
payments over a two-, five- or ten-year period, plus interest from the commencement date.
The Plan
assets are kept in an unsecured account that has no trust fund. In the event of
bankruptcy, any future payments would have no greater rights than that of an unsecured general
creditor of the Company and they confer no legal rights for interest or claim on any assets of the
Company. Benefits provided by the Plan are not insured by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
(PBGC) under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), because the
pension insurance provisions of ERISA do not apply to the Plan.
For the Plan year ended December 31, 2006, eligible participants contributed approximately
$241,000 to the Plan and the Company provided matching funds and interest of approximately $66,000,
net of distributions of $21,000, due to an Associates departure. For the Plan year ended December
31, 2005, eligible participants contributed approximately $120,000 to the Plan and the Company
provided matching funds and interest of approximately $22,000.
(16) SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (Unaudited)
The following represents selected quarterly financial information for fiscal years 2006 and
2005:
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
27,088 |
|
|
$ |
23,496 |
|
|
$ |
30,740 |
|
|
$ |
28,066 |
|
|
$ |
30,812 |
|
|
$ |
26,268 |
|
|
$ |
27,981 |
|
|
$ |
24,524 |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
|
$ |
3,340 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,481 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
784 |
|
Basic net income per
common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Diluted net income
per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
(17) LITIGATION
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in a number of litigation matters
that are incidental to the operation of the business. These matters generally include, among other
things, collection matters with regard to products distributed by the Company and accounts
receivable owed to the Company. The Company currently believes that the resolution of any of these
pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or liquidity, but
an adverse decision in more than one of the matters could be material to its consolidated results
of operations.
F-30
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(18) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 12, 2007 the Company amended a promissory note receivable with Famous Ribs,
Georgia, LLC, Famous Ribs of Snellville, LLC, Famous Ribs of Marietta, LLC, Famous Ribs of
Alpharetta LLC, and Famous Ribs of Lawrenceville, LLC. The purpose of the amendment was to clarify
certain terms of the promissory note, none of which were deemed significant. The terms of the note
were amended from February 1, 2007 to November 17, 2012 to require a minimum installment payment of
$5,000 each month. In addition, a one-time principal payment of $10,000 was required on February
1, 2007. On or before July 1, 2007, an additional principal payment of $300,000 will be required.
On the maturity date, the Borrower shall be required to pay the entire remaining principal balance
together with any unpaid accrued interest.
F-31
Financial Statement Schedule
SCHEDULE II. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits to Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
Costs and |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Balance at End |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
of Period |
|
Year ended January 2, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
98.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(88.9 |
) |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 1, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
65.8 |
|
|
$ |
(38.6 |
) |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
36.8 |
|
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
|
$ |
(50.8 |
) |
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
Reserve for lease termination costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
398.0 |
|
|
$ |
(68.0 |
) |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
F-32
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-10675) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 23, 1996 |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2
to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File
No. 333-10675) filed on August 23, 1996 |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Trademark License Agreement between Famous Daves
of America, Inc. and Grand Pines Resorts, Inc.,
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.11 to
the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No.
333-10675) filed on August 23, 1996 |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2000, by
and between FFCA Acquisition Corporation and
MinWood Partners, Inc., incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-Q filed May 16, 2000 |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Master Lease, dated as of January 21, 2000, by and
between MinWood Partners, Inc. and Famous Daves
of America, Inc., incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-Q filed May 16, 2000 |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2000, by and
between FFCA Funding Corporation and FDA
Properties, Inc., incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K filed March 29, 2001 |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Master Lease, dated as of August 4, 2000, by and
between FDA Properties, Inc. and Famous Daves of
America, Inc., incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K filed March 29, 2001 |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
1995 Associate Stock Option Plan (as amended
through May 22, 2002), incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed August 14,
2002 |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan (as
amended through May 22, 2002), incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed
August 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
1998 Director Stock Option Plan (as amended
through May 22, 2002), incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q filed August 14,
2002 |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Ex 10.10 to Form 10-K filed March 17,
2006 |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Executive Elective Deferred Stock Unit Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form
10-Q filed May 11, 2004 |
EXHIBITS (continued)
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and between Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association and Famous Daves of America,
Inc., dated July 31, 2006, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 2, 2006 |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Employment Agreement dated February 25, 2005 by and between
David Goronkin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed March 2, 2005 |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated 2004-2006 Performance Share
Agreement and Schedule of Grants under such form, incorporated
by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed May
13, 2005 |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated 2005-2007 Performance Share
Agreement and Schedule of Grants under such form, incorporated
by reference to Exhibits 10.3 and 10.4 to Form 10-Q filed May
13, 2005 |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Famous Daves of America, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to Form 8-K filed March 2, 2005 |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
First Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan, dated February 25, 2005, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K filed March 17, 2006 |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Form of 2006-2008 Performance Share Agreement and Schedule of
Grants under such form, incorporated by reference to Exhibits
10.1 and 10.2 to Form 8-K filed December 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Amendment to 1995 Associate Stock Option and Compensation
Plan, effective November 7, 2006, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2006 |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Form of 2007 2009 Performance Share Agreement and Schedule
of Grants under such form, incorporated by reference to
Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to Form 8-K filed February 27, 2007 |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Form of Director Stock Grant, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed February 27, 2007 |
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Subsidiaries of Famous Daves of America, Inc. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC.
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2007
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ David Goronkin
David Goronkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed on March 16, 2007 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David Goronkin
David Goronkin
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Diana Garvis Purcel
Diana Garvis Purcel
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. Jeffrey Dahlberg
K. Jeffrey Dahlberg
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.
F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mary L. Jeffries
Mary L. Jeffries
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Monfort
Richard L. Monfort
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean A. Riesen
Dean A. Riesen
|
|
|
|
Director |