o | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Delaware | 38-1794485 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction | (IRS Employer | |
of Incorporation) | Identification No.) |
21001 Van Born Road, Taylor, Michigan | 48180 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | Non-accelerated filer o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Class |
Shares Outstanding at July 25, 2011 | |
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share |
357,900,000 |
Page No. | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
1 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income for the Three Months and Six
Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 |
2 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
June 30, 2011 and 2010 |
4 | |||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements |
5-19 | |||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
20-26 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
27 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
28 | |||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
28 | |||
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
28 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits |
29 | |||
Signature |
30 |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash investments |
$ | 1,611 | $ | 1,715 | ||||
Receivables |
1,188 | 888 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
131 | 129 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Finished goods |
493 | 393 | ||||||
Raw material |
307 | 246 | ||||||
Work in process |
101 | 93 | ||||||
901 | 732 | |||||||
Total current assets |
3,831 | 3,464 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,698 | 1,737 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,399 | 2,383 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
266 | 269 | ||||||
Other assets |
224 | 287 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,418 | $ | 8,140 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 65 | $ | 66 | ||||
Accounts payable |
921 | 602 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
814 | 819 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,800 | 1,487 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
4,027 | 4,032 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
1,054 | 1,039 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
6,881 | 6,558 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
EQUITY |
||||||||
Masco Corporations shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common shares, par value $1 per share
Authorized shares: 1,400,000,000; issued
and outstanding: 2011 347,500,000; 2010 348,600,000 |
348 | 349 | ||||||
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued
and outstanding: 2011 None; 2010 None |
| | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
37 | 42 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
628 | 720 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
302 | 273 | ||||||
Total Masco Corporations shareholders
equity |
1,315 | 1,384 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
222 | 198 | ||||||
Total equity |
1,537 | 1,582 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 8,418 | $ | 8,140 | ||||
1
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
1,490 | 1,502 | 2,837 | 2,862 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
532 | 546 | 957 | 1,038 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
441 | 427 | 845 | 841 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
91 | 119 | 112 | 197 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(64 | ) | (67 | ) | (127 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment charge for financial investments |
| (33 | ) | | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Other, net |
31 | (3 | ) | 52 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
(33 | ) | (103 | ) | (75 | ) | (159 | ) | |||||||||
Income before income taxes |
58 | 16 | 37 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
38 | 4 | 51 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
20 | 12 | (14 | ) | 16 | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
(12 | ) | (9 | ) | (24 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Masco
Corporation |
$ | 8 | $ | 3 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable
to Masco Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .02 | $ | .01 | $ | (.11 | ) | $ | (.02 | ) | ||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .02 | $ | .01 | $ | (.11 | ) | $ | (.02 | ) | ||||||
Amounts attributable to Masco Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 8 | $ | 3 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||
2
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Cash provided by operations |
$ | 123 | $ | 212 | ||||
(Increase) in receivables |
(293 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||
(Increase) in inventories |
(151 | ) | (122 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, net |
290 | 181 | ||||||
Net cash (for) from operating activities |
(31 | ) | 67 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Increase in debt |
| 2 | ||||||
Payment of debt |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Credit Agreement costs |
(1 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Issuance of Notes, net of issuance costs |
| 494 | ||||||
Retirement of Notes |
| (359 | ) | |||||
Purchase of Company common stock |
(30 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest |
(18 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid |
(54 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Net cash (for) from financing activities |
(105 | ) | 12 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(67 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposition of: |
||||||||
Marketable securities |
49 | | ||||||
Other financial investments |
15 | 2 | ||||||
Property and equipment |
10 | 6 | ||||||
Purchases of other financial investments |
(6 | ) | | |||||
Other, net |
3 | (13 | ) | |||||
Net cash from (for) investing activities |
4 | (67 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
investments |
28 | (41 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||
Decrease for the period |
(104 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
At January 1 |
1,715 | 1,413 | ||||||
At June 30 |
$ | 1,611 | $ | 1,384 | ||||
3
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data) |
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Paid-In | Retained | Comprehensive | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ($1 par value) | Capital | Earnings | Income | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
$ | 2,817 | $ | 350 | $ | 42 | $ | 1,871 | $ | 366 | $ | 188 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
16 | (4 | ) | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
(131 | ) | (100 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax benefit of $4 |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost and net
loss, net of income tax of $1 |
4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(119 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued |
(1 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares retired: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchased |
(45 | ) | (3 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Surrendered (non-cash) |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
(54 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest |
(15 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,608 | $ | 348 | $ | 23 | $ | 1,813 | $ | 262 | $ | 162 | ||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2011 |
1,582 | 349 | 42 | 720 | 273 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(14 | ) | (38 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
80 | 62 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) on marketable securities,
net of income tax of $ |
(38 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost and net
loss, net of income tax of $ |
5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued |
| 2 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares retired: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchased |
(30 | ) | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Surrendered (non-cash) |
(7 | ) | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
(54 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest |
(18 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
31 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 348 | $ | 37 | $ | 628 | $ | 302 | $ | 222 | ||||||||||||
4
A. | In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as at June 30, 2011 and the results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and cash flows and shareholders equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 was derived from audited financial statements. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements | ||
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance which addresses how to determine whether a sales arrangement involves multiple deliverables or contains more than one unit of accounting, and how the sales arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company evaluated this new guidance and the adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or its results of operations. |
5
B. | The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011, by segment, were as follows, in millions: |
Gross Goodwill | Accumulated | Net Goodwill | ||||||||||
At | Impairment | At | ||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | Losses | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
Cabinets and Related
Products |
$ | 590 | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 226 | |||||
Plumbing Products |
549 | (340 | ) | 209 | ||||||||
Installation and Other
Services |
1,819 | (762 | ) | 1,057 | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural
Products |
294 | | 294 | |||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
980 | (367 | ) | 613 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,232 | $ | (1,833 | ) | $ | 2,399 | |||||
Gross Goodwill | Accumulated | Net Goodwill | ||||||||||||||||||
At | Impairment | At | At | |||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2010 | Losses | Dec. 31, 2010 | Other (A) | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related
Products |
$ | 587 | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 223 | $ | 3 | $ | 226 | |||||||||
Plumbing Products |
536 | (340 | ) | 196 | 13 | 209 | ||||||||||||||
Installation and Other
Services |
1,819 | (762 | ) | 1,057 | | 1,057 | ||||||||||||||
Decorative Architectural
Products |
294 | | 294 | | 294 | |||||||||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
980 | (367 | ) | 613 | | 613 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,216 | $ | (1,833 | ) | $ | 2,383 | $ | 16 | $ | 2,399 | |||||||||
(A) | Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation. |
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $186 million and $185 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. The carrying value of the Companys definite-lived intangible assets was $80 million (net of accumulated amortization of $78 million) at June 30, 2011 and $84 million (net of accumulated amortization of $75 million) at December 31, 2010, and principally included customer relationships and non-compete agreements. |
6
C. | Depreciation and amortization expense was $137 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. |
D. | The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital losses. Financial investments included in other assets were as follows, in millions: |
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Auction rate securities |
$ | 22 | $ | 22 | ||||
TriMas Corporation common stock |
| 40 | ||||||
Total recurring investments |
22 | 62 | ||||||
Private equity funds |
101 | 106 | ||||||
Other investments |
9 | 13 | ||||||
Total non-recurring investments |
110 | 119 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 132 | $ | 181 | ||||
The Companys investments in available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows, in millions: |
Pre-tax | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Recorded | ||||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Gains | Losses | Basis | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 19 | $ | 3 | $ | | $ | 22 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
$ | 22 | $ | 40 | $ | | $ | 62 |
Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions: |
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Market | Other | Observable | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Unobservable | 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
$ | 22 | $ | | $ | | $ | 22 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 22 | $ | | $ | | $ | 22 | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Market | Other | Observable | ||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Unobservable | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
$ | 22 | $ | | $ | | $ | 22 | ||||||||
TriMas Corporation |
40 | 40 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 62 | $ | 40 | $ | | $ | 22 | ||||||||
7
The fair value of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model used to value the auction rate securities include: expected maturity of auction rate securities, discount rate used to determine the present value of expected cash flows and the assumptions for credit defaults, since the auction rate securities are backed by credit default swap agreements. | ||
The following tables summarize the changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, in millions: |
Auction Rate | ||||
Securities | ||||
Fair value January 1, 2011 |
$ | 22 | ||
Total losses included in earnings |
| |||
Unrealized (losses) |
| |||
Purchases |
| |||
Settlements |
| |||
Transfer from Level 3 to Level 2 |
| |||
Fair value at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 22 | ||
During 2010, the Company converted all of its holdings in Asahi Tec preferred stock into common stock, which was sold in its entirety in 2010 in open market transactions. |
Asahi Tec | Auction Rate | |||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | ||||||||||
Fair value January 1, 2010 |
$ | 71 | $ | 22 | $ | 93 | ||||||
Total losses included in earnings |
(28 | ) | | (28 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized losses |
(23 | ) | | (23 | ) | |||||||
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 |
(20 | ) | | (20 | ) | |||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | ||||||
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not measure any financial investments on a non-recurring basis, as there was no other-than-temporary decline in the estimated value of private equity funds. Financial investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2010 and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions: |
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Market | Observable | Unobservable | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Gains | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | (Losses) | ||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Other
private investments |
| | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
8
The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in the first six months of 2011 or in the full-year 2010. | ||
Income and impairment charges for financial investments were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Realized gains from: |
||||||||||||||||
TriMas Corporation
common stock |
$ | 27 | $ | | $ | 41 | $ | | ||||||||
Private equity funds |
6 | 1 | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total realized gains |
$ | 33 | $ | 1 | $ | 50 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Impairment charges: |
||||||||||||||||
Asahi Tec Preferred Stock |
$ | | $ | (28 | ) | $ | | $ | (28 | ) | ||||||
Private equity funds |
| (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Other private investments |
| (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total impairment charges |
$ | | $ | (33 | ) | $ | | $ | (33 | ) | ||||||
The fair value of the Companys short-term and long-term fixed-rate debt instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at June 30, 2011 was approximately $4.1 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2010 was approximately $4.2 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion. |
E. | During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge currency fluctuations related to intercompany loans denominated in non-functional currencies. At June 30, 2011, the Company had recorded (losses) of $(4) million on the foreign currency exchange contracts, which is partially offset by gains related to the translation of loans and accounts denominated in non-functional currencies. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $ million and $5 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains net of $4 million and $1 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. |
During 2011 and 2010, the Company, including certain European operations, also entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage a portion of its exposure to currency fluctuations in the European euro and the U.S. dollar. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded liabilities of $2 million and $3 million to reflect contract prices at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded gains (losses) net of $1 million and $(2) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) net of $(1) million and $(1) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. |
9
In the event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the foreign currency forward contracts, the Companys exposure is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential with such institutions. | ||
During 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into several contracts to manage its exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded assets of $6 million and $7 million to reflect contract prices at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in cost of goods sold. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) net of $(1) million and $(1) million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had recorded (losses) net of $(1) million and $(2) million, respectively, related to these commodity contracts. | ||
The fair value of these derivative contracts is estimated on a recurring basis, quarterly, using Level 2 inputs (significant other observable inputs). |
F. | Changes in the Companys warranty liability were as follows, in millions: |
Six Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 107 | $ | 109 | ||||
Accruals for warranties
issued during the period |
14 | 42 | ||||||
Accruals related to
pre-existing warranties |
4 | (4 | ) | |||||
Settlements made (in cash or
kind) during the period |
(19 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
| (3 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 106 | $ | 107 | ||||
G. | Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant, at June 30, 2011, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $987 million. Additionally, at June 30, 2011, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders equity of approximately $531 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant. |
In order to borrow under the Credit Agreement, there must not be any default in the Companys covenants in the credit agreement (i.e., in addition to the two financial covenants, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and the Companys representations and warranties in the credit agreement must be true in all material respects on the date of borrowing (i.e., principally no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, since December 31, 2009, in each case, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency). The Company was in compliance with all covenants and no borrowings have been made at June 30, 2011. |
10
At June 30, 2011, there were outstanding $108 million principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (Notes), with an accreted value of $58 million, which has been classified as short-term debt. Holders of the Notes have the option to require the Notes be repurchased by the Company on July 20, 2011 and every five years thereafter. As of July 25, 2011, holders of $107.7 million principal amount at maturity with an accreted value of $57.9 million of Notes have required the Company to repurchase the Notes for cash. |
H. | The Companys 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors of the Company. At June 30, 2011, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights. Pre-tax compensation expense and the related income tax benefit, for these stock-based incentives, were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Long-term stock awards |
$ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 19 | $ | 19 | ||||||||
Stock options |
6 | 6 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Phantom stock awards and stock
appreciation rights |
(1 | ) | (4 | ) | 2 | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 14 | $ | 11 | $ | 32 | $ | 29 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
$ | 5 | $ | 4 | $ | 12 | $ | 11 | ||||||||
Long-Term Stock Awards |
Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market. | ||
The Companys long-term stock award activity was as follows, shares in millions: |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Unvested stock award shares at January 1 |
10 | 9 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 19 | $ | 21 | ||||
Stock award shares granted |
2 | 3 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 13 | $ | 14 | ||||
Stock award shares vested |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 19 | $ | 23 | ||||
Stock award shares forfeited |
| | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 18 | $ | 20 | ||||
Unvested stock award shares at June 30 |
11 | 11 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 17 | $ | 19 |
11
At June 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $134 million and $145 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of five years and six years, respectively. | ||
The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares which vested during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $23 million and $17 million, respectively. | ||
Stock Options | ||
Stock options are granted to key employees of the Company. The exercise price equals the market price of the Companys common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant date. | ||
The Company granted 2,372,500 of stock option shares in the six months ended June 30, 2011 with a grant date exercise price approximating $13 per share. In the first six months of 2011, 2,591,700 stock option shares were forfeited (including options that expired unexercised). |
12
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Option shares outstanding, January 1 |
37 | 36 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 21 | $ | 23 | ||||
Option shares granted, including restoration
options |
2 | 5 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 13 | $ | 14 | ||||
Option shares exercised |
| | ||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of
exercise (A) |
$ | 1 | million | $ | 1 | million | ||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 8 | $ | 8 | ||||
Option shares forfeited |
2 | 3 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 22 | $ | 23 | ||||
Option shares outstanding, June 30 |
37 | 38 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 21 | $ | 21 | ||||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Option shares vested and expected to vest,
June 30 |
37 | 37 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 21 | $ | 21 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value (A) |
$ | 20 | million | $ | 14 | million | ||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Option shares exercisable (vested),
June 30 |
24 | 22 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
$ | 24 | $ | 25 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value (A) |
$ | 8 | million | $ | 3 | million | ||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
5 | 5 |
(A) | Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Companys stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price (grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares. |
At June 30, 2011 and 2010, there was $45 million and $56 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) related to unvested stock options; such options had a weighted average vesting period of three years in both 2011 and 2010. |
13
The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, were as follows: |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 5.10 | $ | 5.30 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.72 | % | 2.77 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
2.34 | % | 2.17 | % | ||||
Volatility factor |
49.00 | % | 46.01 | % | ||||
Expected option life |
6 years | 6 years |
I. | The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit or defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees. In addition to the Companys qualified defined-benefit pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement plans, to which payments are determined annually by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company adjusted certain employee expense related accruals which resulted in a $5 million reduction to expenses related to the fourth quarter of 2010. The effect was not material to the previously issued financial statements. | ||
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company froze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Companys domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. Future benefit accruals related to the Companys foreign non-qualified plans were frozen several years ago. | ||
Net periodic pension cost for the Companys defined-benefit pension plans was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Qualified | Non-Qualified | Qualified | Non-Qualified | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | | ||||||||
Interest cost |
11 | 2 | 12 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(8 | ) | | (10 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
3 | | 3 | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 6 | $ | 2 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Qualified | Non-Qualified | Qualified | Non-Qualified | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | | ||||||||
Interest cost |
22 | 4 | 23 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(16 | ) | | (18 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
5 | | 5 | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 12 | $ | 4 | $ | 12 | $ | 4 | ||||||||
14
At December 31, 2010, the Company reported a net liability of $522 million, of which $163 million was related to our non-qualified, supplemental retirement plans, which are not subject to the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act. In accordance with the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (AFTAP) for the various defined-benefit pension plans ranges from 62 percent to 86 percent. At December 31, 2010, the Company had one plan that offered accelerated benefits (i.e., lump sum distributions) and the AFTAP for that plan is less than 80 percent; therefore, the plan is prohibited from allowing participants to receive any lump sum distribution in excess of 50 percent of the benefit value. In addition, plan amendments increasing benefits or liabilities for that plan are also prohibited. |
15
J. | Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales (A) | Operating Profit (Loss) | Net Sales (A) | Operating Profit (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Companys operations by
segment were: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 330 | $ | 400 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 637 | $ | 803 | $ | (77 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||
Plumbing Products |
761 | 682 | 95 | 86 | 1,471 | 1,345 | 179 | 170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
294 | 309 | (26 | ) | (23 | ) | 548 | 582 | (66 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
492 | 505 | 90 | 109 | 867 | 894 | 159 | 196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
145 | 152 | | 11 | 271 | 276 | (10 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 132 | $ | 146 | $ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | $ | 185 | $ | 254 | ||||||||||||||||
The Companys operations by
geographic area were: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 1,563 | $ | 1,659 | $ | 87 | $ | 114 | $ | 2,896 | $ | 3,089 | $ | 98 | $ | 178 | ||||||||||||||||
International, principally Europe |
459 | 389 | 45 | 32 | 898 | 811 | 87 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | 132 | 146 | $ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | 185 | 254 | ||||||||||||||||||||
General corporate expense, net |
(36 | ) | (27 | ) | (68 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge for litigation settlement (B) |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
91 | 119 | 112 | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(33 | ) | (103 | ) | (75 | ) | (159 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 58 | $ | 16 | $ | 37 | $ | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(A) | Inter-segment sales were not material. | |
(B) | Charge for litigation settlement relates to a business unit in the Other Specialty Products segment. |
16
K. | Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net, was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Income from cash and
cash investments |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | ||||||||
Income from financial
investments (Note D) |
33 | 1 | 50 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Other items, net |
(3 | ) | (5 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Total other net |
$ | 31 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 52 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||
Other items, net, included $3 million and $1 million of currency losses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Other items, net, included $5 million and $6 million of currency losses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. |
L. | Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator (basic and diluted): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 8 | $ | 3 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||
Allocation to unvested
restricted stock awards |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable
to common shareholders |
7 | 2 | (40 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to
common shareholders |
$ | 7 | $ | 2 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic common shares (based
upon weighted average) |
348 | 348 | 348 | 349 | ||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Contingent common shares |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Stock option dilution |
1 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||
Diluted common shares |
349 | 349 | 348 | 349 | ||||||||||||
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company allocated dividends to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities). | ||
At June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not include any common shares related to the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (Notes) in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share, as the price of the Companys common stock at June 30, 2011 and 2010 did not exceed the equivalent accreted value of the Notes. | ||
Additionally, 36 million common shares and 37 million common shares, respectively, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 37 million common shares and 38 million common shares, respectively, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 related to stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect. |
17
In the first six months of 2011, the Company granted 2 million shares of long-term stock awards; to offset the dilutive impact of these awards, the Company also repurchased and retired approximately 2 million shares of Company common stock, for cash aggregating $30 million. At June 30, 2011, the Company had 25 million shares of its common stock remaining under the July 2007 Board of Directors repurchase authorization. | ||
On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.075 ($.075) and $.15 ($.15), respectively, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010. |
M. | The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business. |
As previously disclosed, a lawsuit was brought against the Company and a number of its insulation installation companies alleging that certain of their practices violated provisions of the federal antitrust laws. The case was filed in October 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Columbus Drywall & Insulation, Inc., Leo Jones Insulation, Inc., Southland Insulators, Inc., Southland Insulators of Maryland, Inc. d/b/a Devere Insulation, Southland Insulators of Delaware LLC d/b/a Delmarva Insulation, and Whitson Insulation Company of Grand Rapids, Inc. against the Company, its subsidiaries Masco Contractors Services Group Corp., Masco Contractor Services Central, Inc. (MCS Central) and Masco Contractor Services East, Inc., and several insulation manufacturers (the Columbus Drywall case). In February 2009, the court certified a class of 377 insulation contractors. Another suit was filed in March 2003 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia by Wilson Insulation Company, Wilson Insulation of Augusta, Inc. and The Wilson Insulation Group, Inc. against the Company, Masco Contractor Services, Inc., and MCS Central that alleged anticompetitive conduct. This case has been removed from the courts active docket. In March 2007, Albert Von Der Werth and Valerie Good filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, its subsidiary Masco Contractor Services, and several insulation manufacturers seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive conduct. This case was subsequently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and has been administratively stayed by the court. An additional suit, which was filed in September 2005 and alleged anticompetitive conduct, was dismissed with prejudice in December 2006. | ||
The Company is vigorously defending the Columbus Drywall case. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company and its insulation installation companies, which is the subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any antitrust laws. The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment. There cannot be any assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in these lawsuits, or, if unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material and would not have a material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by its insulation installation companies in doing business. |
18
N. | The effective tax rate was 138 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating losses and losses in certain jurisdictions providing no tax benefit. | |
As a result of tax audit closings, settlements and expiration of applicable statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions within the next 12 months, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for uncertain tax positions could be reduced by approximately $6 million. |
19
Three Months Ended | Percent | |||||||||||
June 30, | (Decrease) Increase | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 vs. 2010 | ||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 330 | $ | 400 | (18 | %) | ||||||
Plumbing Products |
761 | 682 | 12 | % | ||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
294 | 309 | (5 | %) | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
492 | 505 | (3 | %) | ||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
145 | 152 | (5 | %) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | (1 | %) | ||||||
North America |
$ | 1,563 | $ | 1,659 | (6 | %) | ||||||
International, principally Europe |
459 | 389 | 18 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | (1 | %) | ||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 637 | $ | 803 | (21 | %) | ||||||
Plumbing Products |
1,471 | 1,345 | 9 | % | ||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
548 | 582 | (6 | %) | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
867 | 894 | (3 | %) | ||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
271 | 276 | (2 | %) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | (3 | %) | ||||||
North America |
$ | 2,896 | $ | 3,089 | (6 | %) | ||||||
International, principally Europe |
898 | 811 | 11 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | (3 | %) | ||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Operating Profit (Loss) Margins: (A) |
||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
(8.2 | %) | (9.3 | %) | (12.1 | %) | (6.5 | %) | ||||||||
Plumbing Products |
12.5 | % | 12.6 | % | 12.2 | % | 12.6 | % | ||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
(8.8 | %) | (7.4 | %) | (12.0 | %) | (11.2 | %) | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
18.3 | % | 21.6 | % | 18.3 | % | 21.9 | % | ||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
| % | 7.2 | % | (3.7 | %) | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
North America |
5.6 | % | 6.9 | % | 3.4 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
International, principally Europe |
9.8 | % | 8.2 | % | 9.7 | % | 9.4 | % | ||||||||
Total |
6.5 | % | 7.1 | % | 4.9 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||||||
Total operating profit margin,
as reported |
4.5 | % | 5.8 | % | 3.0 | % | 5.1 | % |
(A) | Before general corporate expense, net and the charge for litigation settlement; see Note J to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
20
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales, as reported |
$ | 2,022 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,794 | $ | 3,900 | ||||||||
Acquisitions (none) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Net sales, excluding
acquisitions |
2,022 | 2,048 | 3,794 | 3,900 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation |
(54 | ) | | (54 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net sales, excluding
acquisitions and the
effect of currency
translation |
$ | 1,968 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 3,740 | $ | 3,900 | ||||||||
21
22
23
24
25
26
a. | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. | ||
The Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) as of June 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | |||
b. | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. | ||
During the second quarter of 2011, we completed a phased deployment of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system at several branches of Masco Contractor Services, one of the Companys larger business units. As a result, financial and operating transactions in those branches now utilize the automated functionality relative to revenue recognition and inventory management. This new system represents a process improvement initiative and is not in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. The system implementation is designed, in part, to enhance the overall system of internal control over financial reporting through further automation of various business processes. | |||
There were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
27
28
12 | - | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends | ||||||
31a | - | Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||||||
31b | - | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||||||
32 | - | Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code | ||||||
101 | - | Interactive Data File |
29
MASCO CORPORATION | ||||||
By: | /s/ John G. Sznewajs | |||||
Name: | John G. Sznewajs | |||||
Title: | Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer | |||||
July 28, 2011 |
30
Exhibit | ||
Exhibit 12 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends |
|
Exhibit 31a | Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
Exhibit 31b | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule
13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
Exhibit 32 | Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code |
|
Exhibit 101 | Interactive Data File |
31