FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2006.
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
Commission file
no. 1-2958
Hubbell Incorporated
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
06-0397030
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
584 Derby Milford Road
Orange, Connecticut
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
06477-4024
(Zip Code)
|
(203) 799-4100
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on which Registered
|
|
Class A Common
$.01 par value (20 votes per share)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Class B Common
$.01 par value (1 vote per share)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Series B Junior Participating
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Yes
o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated
Filer þ Accelerated
Filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The approximate aggregate market value of the voting stock held
by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2006 was
$2,644,628,636*. The number of shares outstanding of the
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of
February 20, 2007 was 8,098,932 and 51,866,583,
respectively.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the annual
meeting of shareholders scheduled to be held on May 7,
2007, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC), are incorporated by reference in answer
to Part III of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
* |
|
Calculated by excluding all shares held by Executive Officers
and Directors of registrant and the Louie E. Roche Trust, the
Harvey Hubbell Trust, the Harvey Hubbell Foundation and the
registrants pension plans, without conceding that all such
persons or entities are affiliates of registrant for
purpose of the Federal Securities Laws. |
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
Hubbell Incorporated (herein referred to as Hubbell,
the Company, the registrant,
we, our or us, which
references shall include its divisions and subsidiaries as the
context may require) was founded as a proprietorship in 1888,
and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905. Hubbell is
primarily engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of high
quality electrical and electronic products for a broad range of
commercial, industrial, telecommunications, utility, and
residential applications. Products are either sourced complete
or manufactured or assembled by subsidiaries in the United
States, Canada, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy, the
United Kingdom, Brazil and Australia. Hubbell also participates
in joint ventures in Taiwan and Hong Kong, and maintains sales
offices in Singapore, the Peoples Republic of China,
Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea, and the Middle East.
For management reporting and control, the businesses are divided
into three segments: Electrical, Power and Industrial
Technology, as described below. Reference is made to
Note 20 Industry Segments and Geographic Area
Information under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Companys annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports are made available free of
charge through the Investor Relations section of the
Companys website at http://www.hubbell.com as soon
as practicable after such material is electronically filed with,
or furnished to, the SEC.
In June 2006, the Company acquired Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc.
for $117.4 million in cash. Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc.,
renamed Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc., manufactures precast polymer
concrete products to house underground equipment and also has a
line of surface drain products. These products are sold to the
electrical utility and telecommunications industries. Hubbell
Lenoir City, Inc. has been included in the Power segment.
In November 2006, the Company purchased all of the outstanding
common stock of Austdac Pty Limited (Austdac) for
$28.1 million, net of $2.3 million of cash acquired.
Austdac is based in New South Wales, Australia and manufactures
a wide range of products used in harsh and hazardous
applications in a variety of industries. Austdac has been added
to the Industrial Technology segment.
ELECTRICAL
SEGMENT
The Electrical segment is comprised of businesses that primarily
sell through distributors, lighting showrooms, home centers and
telephone and telecommunications companies, and represents stock
and custom products including standard and special application
wiring device products, lighting fixtures and controls,
fittings, switches and outlet boxes, enclosures, wire management
products and voice and data signal processing components. The
products are typically used in and around industrial,
commercial, and institutional facilities by electrical
contractors, maintenance personnel, electricians, and
telecommunications companies. Certain lighting fixtures, wiring
devices and electrical products also have residential
application.
Electrical
Wiring Devices
Hubbell designs, manufactures and sells highly durable and
reliable wiring devices which are supplied principally to
industrial, commercial, institutional and residential customers.
These products, comprising several thousand catalog items,
include plugs, dimmers, receptacles (including surge suppressor
units), wall outlets, connectors, adapters, floor boxes,
switches, occupancy sensors (including passive infrared and
ultrasonic motion sensing devices), lampholders, control
switches, outlet strips, pendants, weatherproof enclosures, and
wallplates.
Pin-and-sleeve
devices built to International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) standards have incorporated improved water and
dust-tight construction and impact resistance. Switch and
receptacle wall plates feature proprietary thermoplastic
materials offering high impact resistance and durability, and
are available in a variety of colors and styles. Delivery
systems, including metallic and nonmetallic surface raceway
systems for power, data and communications distribution, provide
efficiency and flexibility in both initial installations and
remodeling applications. Hubbell also sells wiring devices for
use in certain environments requiring specialized products, such
as signal and control connectors and cable assemblies for the
connection of sensors in materials processing, modular
2
cable protection systems, cable and devices for marine
applications and portable power distribution units with ground
fault protection for commercial and industrial applications.
Circuit
Guard®
ground fault units protect the user from electrical shock by
interrupting the circuit to which they are connected when a
fault to ground is detected. Hubbell manufactures TVSS
(transient voltage surge suppression) devices, under the
Spikeshield®
trademark, which are used to protect electronic equipment such
as personal computers and other supersensitive electronic
equipment. Hubbell also manufactures
and/or sells
components designed for use in local area networks
(LANs) and other telecommunications applications
supporting high-speed data and voice signals. Primary products
include work station modular jacks, faceplates, surface
housings, modular furniture plates, cross connect patch panels,
connectorized cable assemblies, punch down blocks, free standing
racks, enclosures and other products used for installation,
testing and distribution of LANs. These products support
unshielded, shielded and fiber optic media types and typically
service commercial, institutional and industrial applications.
Lighting
Fixtures and Controls
Hubbell manufactures and sells lighting fixtures for indoor and
outdoor applications with four classifications of products:
Outdoor, Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential.
Outdoor products include Hubbell outdoor lighting and
Sterner®
floodlights and poles,
Devine®
series fixtures, Kim
Lighting®
architectural fixtures which feature pedestrian zone, path,
landscape, building and area lighting products and poles,
Securitytm
outdoor and signage fixtures,
Spauldingtm
area lighting fixtures and poles, Architectural Area Lighting
flood and step and wall mounted lighting fixtures, sconces,
bollards in period and contemporary designs, area lighting
fixtures and poles and
Whitewaytm
canopy light fixtures, which are used to illuminate service
stations, truck stops, outdoor display signs, parking lots,
roadways, pedestrian areas, security areas, automobile
dealerships, shopping centers, convenience stores, quick service
restaurants, and similar areas, and
Sportsliter®
fixtures which are used to illuminate athletic and recreational
fields. In addition, a line of
Lightscaper®
decorative outdoor fixtures is sold for use in landscaping
applications such as pools, gardens and walkways. Industrial
products include high and low bay fixtures used to illuminate
factories, work spaces, and areas with specialty requirements
such as paint rooms, clean rooms and warehouses.
Commercial/Institutional products include high intensity
discharge (HID) fixtures,
Aleratm
architectural and Columbia
Lighting®
specification grade fluorescent fixtures,
Dual-Lite®
emergency and exit fixtures, and
Prescolite®
recessed, surface mounted and track fixtures which are used for
offices, schools, hospitals, airports, retail stores, and
similar applications. The fixtures use high pressure sodium and
metal-halide HID lamps, as well as quartz, fluorescent and
incandescent lamps, all of which are purchased from other
sources. Hubbell also manufactures a broad range of life safety
products, emergency lighting, exit signs and inverter power
systems which are used in specialized safety applications under
the
Dual-Lite®
and Corner
Stone®
life safety trademarks, and a line of IEC lighting fixtures
designed for hazardous, hostile and corrosive applications sold
under the
Chalmittm,
Victortm
and
Killark®
trademarks. The residential products, which are sold under the
Progress
Lighting®
and Thomasville
Lighting®
trademarks, include chandeliers, hall and foyer sconces, track,
recessed, bath and vanity, pendants, close to ceiling,
under-cabinet, portable lights, fans, door chimes, dimmers, and
outdoor and landscape lighting fixtures.
Outlet
Boxes, Enclosures and Fittings
Hubbell manufactures
and/or
sells: (a) under the
Raco®
trademark, steel and plastic boxes used at outlets, switch
locations and junction points; (b) a broad line of metallic
fittings, rigid plastic conduit fittings, EMT (thinwall)
fittings and liquid tight conduit fittings; (c) Bell
Outdoor®
outlet boxes; (d) a variety of electrical boxes, covers,
combination devices, lampholders and lever switches manufactured
under the
Bell®
trademark, with an emphasis on weather-resistant products
suitable for outdoor applications; and (e) under the
Wiegmann®
trademark, a full-line of fabricated steel electrical equipment
enclosures such as rainproof and dust-tight panels, consoles and
cabinets, wireway and electronic enclosures and a line of
non-metallic electrical equipment enclosures.
Wiegmann®
products are designed to enclose and protect electrical
conductors, terminations, instruments, power distribution and
control equipment.
3
Holding
Devices
Hubbell manufactures and sells a line of
Kellems®
and
Bryant®
mesh grips used to pull, support and create strain relief in
elongated items such as cables, electrical cords, hoses and
conduits, a line of
Gotcha®
cord connectors designed to prevent electrical conductors from
pulling away from electrical terminals to which the conductors
are attached, and wire management products including a
non-metallic liquid-tight flexible conduit for OEM applications.
The grips are sold under the
Kellems®
and
Dua-Pull®
trademarks and range in size and strength to accommodate
differing application needs. These products, which are designed
to tighten around the gripped items, are sold to industrial,
commercial, utility and microwave and cell phone tower markets.
Hazardous
and Hostile Location Application Products
Hubbells special application products, which are sold
under the
Killark®
trademark, include weatherproof and hazardous location products
suitable for standard, explosion-proof and other hostile area
applications, conduit raceway fittings,
Disconex®
switches, enclosures,
HostileLite®lighting
fixtures, electrical distribution equipment, standard and custom
electrical motor controls, junction boxes, plugs and
receptacles. Hubbell also manufactures and sells, under the
Hawketm
trademark, a line of cable glands and cable connectors,
enclosures and breathers for the hazardous area and industrial
markets. Hazardous locations are those areas where a potential
for explosion and fire exists due to the presence of flammable
gasses, fibers, vapors, dust or other easily ignitable materials
and include such applications as refineries, petro-chemical
plants, grain elevators and material processing areas.
Telecommunications
Products
Hubbell designs, manufactures and sells, under the
Pulsecom®
trademark, voice and data signal processing components primarily
used by telephone and telecommunications companies, consisting
of channel cards and banks for loop and trunk carriers, racks
and cabinets. These products provide a broad range of
communications access solutions for use by the telephone and
telecommunications industry including: (a) digital loop
carrier solutions to multiplex traffic from many users over a
single link using existing copper or fiber facilities and
providing easier and more cost-effective service to new users,
since fewer and smaller cables are required for providing
expanded service; and (b) D4 solutions to provide delivery
of integrated voice and data services. Customers of these
product lines include various telecommunications companies, the
Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs),
independent telephone companies, competitive local exchange
carriers, companies with private networks, and internet service
providers.
Sales and
Distribution of Electrical Segment Products
A majority of Hubbells Electrical segment products are
stock items and are sold through electrical and industrial
distributors, home centers, some retail and hardware outlets,
and lighting showrooms. Special application products are sold
primarily through wholesale distributors to contractors,
industrial customers and original equipment manufacturers. Voice
and data signal processing equipment products are represented
worldwide through a direct sales organization and by selected
independent telecommunications representatives, primarily sold
through datacom, electrical and catalogue distribution channels.
Telecommunications products are sold primarily by direct sales
to customers in the United States and internationally through
sales personnel and sales representatives. Hubbell maintains a
sales and marketing organization to assist potential users with
the application of certain products to their specific
requirements, and with architects, engineers, industrial
designers, original equipment manufacturers and electrical
contractors for the design of electrical systems to meet the
specific requirements of industrial, institutional, commercial
and residential users. Hubbell is also represented by sales
agents for its lighting fixtures, electrical wiring devices,
boxes, enclosures, and fittings product lines. The sales of
Electrical Segment products accounted for approximately 67% of
Hubbells revenue in 2006 and 71% in 2005 and 74% in 2004.
POWER
SEGMENT
Power segment operations design and manufacture a wide variety
of construction, switching and protection products, hot line
tools, grounding equipment, cover ups, fittings and fasteners,
cable accessories, insulators, arresters, cutouts,
sectionalizers, connectors and compression tools for the
building and maintenance of overhead
4
and underground power and telephone lines, as well as
applications in the industrial, construction and pipeline
industries.
Electrical
Transmission and Distribution Products
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the Ohio
Brass®
registered trademark, a complete line of polymer insulators and
high-voltage surge arresters used in the construction of
electrical transmission and distribution lines and substations.
The primary focus in this product area are the
Hi*Lite®,
Hi*Lite®XL
and
Veri*Litetm
polymer insulator lines and the polymer housed metal-oxide
varistor surge arrester lines. Electrical transmission products
and post insulators are used in the expansion and upgrading of
electrical transmission capability.
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Chance®
trademark, products used in the electrical transmission and
distribution and telecommunications industries, including
overhead and underground electrical apparatus such as
(a) distribution switches (to control and route the flow of
power through electrical lines); (b) cutouts,
sectionalizers, and fuses (to protect against faults and
over-current conditions on power distribution systems); and
(c) fiberglass insulation systems (pole framing and
conductor insulation).
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Anderson®
trademark, electrical connectors and associated hardware
including pole line, line and tower hardware, compression
crimping tools and accessories, mechanical and compression
connectors, suspension clamps, terminals, supports, couplers,
and tees for utility distribution and transmission systems,
substations, and utility industry.
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Fargo®
trademark, electrical power distribution and transmission
products, principally for the utility industry. Distribution
products include electrical connectors, automatic line splices,
dead ends, hot line taps, wildlife protectors, and various
associated products. Transmission products include splices,
sleeves, connectors, dead ends, spacers and dampers. Products
also consist of original equipment and resale products including
substation fittings for cable, tube and bus as well as
underground enclosures, wrenches, hydraulic pumps and presses,
and coatings.
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Hubbell®
trademark, cable accessories including loadbreak switching
technology, deadbreak products, surge protection, cable splicing
and cable termination products, as well as automation-ready
overhead switches and aluminum transformer equipment mounts for
transformers and equipment.
Hubbell manufactures and sells under the
Quazite®
brand name a complete line of polymer concrete in-ground
enclosures, equipment pads, and special drain products that are
sold to the electric utility, telecommunications industry, and a
variety of other industries.
Construction
Materials/Tools
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Chance®
trademark, (a) line construction materials including
power-installed foundation systems and earth anchors to secure
overhead power and communications line poles, guyed and
self-supporting towers, streetlight poles and pipelines (helical
pier foundation systems are used to support homes and buildings,
and earth anchors are used in a variety of farm, home and
construction projects including tie-back applications)
(b) pole line hardware, including galvanized steel fixtures
and extruded plastic materials used in overhead and underground
line construction, connectors, fasteners, pole and crossarm
accessories, insulator pins, mounting brackets and related
components, and other accessories for making high voltage
connections and linkages; (c) construction tools and
accessories for building overhead and underground power and
telephone lines; and (d) hot-line tools (all types of tools
mounted on insulated poles used to construct and maintain
energized high voltage lines) and other safety equipment.
Hubbell also manufactures and sells, under the Atlas Systems,
Inc.®
trademark, helical and resistance piering products used in a
variety of civil engineering applications.
Sales and
Distribution of Power Segment Products
Sales of Power segment products are made through a Hubbell sales
and marketing organization to distributors and directly to users
such as electric utilities, mining operations, industrial firms,
and engineering and construction
5
firms. While Hubbell believes its sales in this area are not
materially dependent upon any customer or group of customers, a
decrease in purchases by public utilities does affect this
category. The sale of Power Segment products accounted for
approximately 24% of Hubbells total revenue in 2006 and
22% in 2005 and 19% in 2004.
INDUSTRIAL
TECHNOLOGY SEGMENT
The Industrial Technology segment consists of operations that
design and manufacture test and measurement equipment, high
voltage power supplies and variable transformers, industrial
controls including motor speed controls, pendant-type
push-button stations, overhead crane controls, control and
pressure switches, DC devices, Gleason
Reel®
electric cable and hose reels, and specialized communications
systems such as intra-facility communications systems, telephone
systems, and land mobile radio peripherals. Products are sold
primarily to steel mills, industrial complexes, oil, gas and
petrochemical industries, seaports, transportation authorities,
the security industry (malls and colleges), cable and electronic
equipment manufacturers, and mining industry.
High
Voltage Test and Measurement Equipment
Hubbell manufactures and sells, under the
Hipotronics®,
Haefely
Testtm
and
Tettex®
trademarks, a broad line of high voltage test and measurement
systems to test materials and equipment used in the generation,
transmission and distribution of electricity, and high voltage
power supplies and electromagnetic compliance equipment for use
in the electrical and electronic industries. Principal products
include AC/DC hipot testers and megohmmeters, cable fault
location systems, oil testers and DC hipots, impulse generators,
digital measurement systems and tan-delta bridges, AC series
resonant and corona detection systems, DC test sets and power
supplies, variable transformers, voltage regulators, and motor
and transformer test sets.
Industrial
Controls and Communication Systems
Hubbell manufactures and sells a variety of heavy-duty
electrical and radio control products which have broad
application in the control of industrial equipment and
processes. These products range from standard and specialized
industrial control components to combinations of components that
control industrial manufacturing processes. Standard products
include motor speed controls, pendant-type push-button stations,
pressure switches (used in air compressor and water pump
systems), DC devices (used in locomotive and heavy industrial
control systems), power and grounding resistors and overhead
crane controls. Also manufactured and sold are a line of
transfer switches used to direct electrical supply from
alternate sources, and a line of fire pump control products used
in fire control systems.
Hubbell manufactures, under the Gleason
Reel®
trademark, industrial-quality cable management products
including electric cable and hose reels, protective steel and
nylon cable tracks (cable and hose carriers), cable festooning
hardware, highly engineered container crane reels and festoons
for the international market, slip rings, and a line of
ergonomic tool support systems (workstation accessories and
components such as balancers, retractors, torque reels, tool
supports, boom and jib kits).
Hubbell manufactures and sells under the
GAI-Tronics®
trademark, specialized communications systems designed to
withstand indoor and outdoor hazardous environments. Products
include intra-facility communication systems, telephone systems,
and land mobile radio peripherals. These products are sold to
oil, gas and petrochemical industries, transportation
authorities (for use on public highways and in trains and on
train platforms), and the security industry (for use in malls
and on college campuses).
Hubbell manufactures and sells under the Austdac name a line of
harsh and hazardous application products including communication
systems, gas monitoring equipment, intrinsically safe lighting
and conveyer control equipment. Austdac distributes to various
industries, but primarily to the coal mining industries.
Sales and
Distribution of Industrial Technology Segment Products
Hubbells Industrial Technology segment products are sold
primarily through direct sales and sales representatives to
contractors, industrial customers and original equipment
manufacturers, with the exception of high
6
voltage test and measurement equipment which is sold primarily
by direct sales to customers in the United States and in foreign
countries through its sales engineers and independent sales
representatives.
The sale of products in the Industrial Technology Segment
accounted for approximately 9% of Hubbells total revenue
in 2006, and 7% in 2005 and 2004.
INFORMATION
APPLICABLE TO ALL GENERAL CATEGORIES
International
Operations
The Company has several operations located in the United
Kingdom. Hubbell Limited manufactures
and/or
markets fuse switches, contactors, selected wiring device
products and premise wiring products, industrial control
products used in motor control applications such as fuse
switches and contactors. Chalmit Lighting manufactures
and/or
markets lighting fixtures designed for hazardous, hostile and
corrosive applications. Hawke Cable Glands (Hawke)
manufactures
and/or
markets a range of products used in hazardous locations
including brass cable glands and cable connectors used in
watertight terminations, cable transition devices, utility
transformer breathers and enclosures. GAI-Tronics manufactures
and/or
markets specialized communication systems designed to withstand
indoor and outdoor hazardous environments.
Hubbell Canada LP and Hubbell de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. market and
sell wiring devices, premise wiring products, lighting fixtures
and controls, grips, fittings, switches and outlet boxes,
hazardous location products, electrical transmission and
distribution products and earth anchoring systems. Industrial
control products are sold in Canada through an independent sales
agent. Hubbell Canada LP also designs and manufactures
electrical outlet boxes, metallic wall plates, and related
accessories.
Hawke Asia Pacific Ltd. in Singapore markets wiring devices,
lighting fixtures, hazardous location products and electrical
transmission and distribution products.
Haefely Test, AG in Switzerland designs and manufactures high
voltage test and instrumentation systems, and GAI-Tronics S.r.l.
in Italy designs and manufactures specialized communications
systems.
Hubbell manufactures, markets and sells, under the
Delmar®
trademark, products used in the electric utility transmission
and distribution industries, including cutouts, fuselinks,
arresters and overhead and substation switches. These products
are manufactured at the Companys facility in Tatui,
Brazil, for sale primarily in Latin America.
Austdac manufactures a variety of products used in harsh and
hazardous applications including material handling, conveyer
control and monitoring equipment, gas detection equipment, voice
communications systems and emergency warning lights and
sounders. Austdac Pty Limited is based in New South Wales,
Australia.
Hubbell also manufactures lighting products, weatherproof outlet
boxes, fittings, and power products in Juarez and Tijuana,
Mexico.
As a percentage of total sales, international shipments from
foreign subsidiaries directly to third parties were 13% in 2006,
11% in 2005 and 10% in 2004 with the Canadian and United Kingdom
markets representing approximately 38% and 32%, respectively, of
the 2006 total.
Raw
Materials
Raw materials used in the manufacture of Hubbell products
primarily include steel, brass, copper, aluminum, bronze,
plastics, phenolics, zinc, nickel, elastomers and
petrochemicals. Hubbell also purchases certain electrical and
electronic components, including solenoids, lighting ballasts,
printed circuit boards, integrated circuit chips and cord sets,
from a number of suppliers. Hubbell is not materially dependent
upon any one supplier for raw materials used in the manufacture
of its products and equipment, and at the present time, raw
materials and components essential to its operation are in
adequate supply. However, certain of these principal raw
materials are sourced from a limited number of suppliers. Also
see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk.
7
Patents
Hubbell has approximately 1,200 active United States and foreign
patents covering many of its products, which expire at various
times. While Hubbell deems these patents to be of value, it does
not consider its business to be dependent upon patent
protection. Hubbell licenses under patents owned by others, as
may be needed, and grants licenses under certain of its patents.
Working
Capital
Inventory, accounts receivable and accounts payable levels,
payment terms and, where applicable, return policies are in
accordance with the general practices of the electrical products
industry and standard business procedures. See also Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
Backlog
Backlog of orders believed to be firm at December 31, 2006
were approximately $211.3 million compared to
$174.0 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in
the backlog in 2006 is attributable to increased order levels in
the Power and Industrial Technology segments. A majority of the
backlog is expected to be shipped in the current year. Although
this backlog is important, the majority of Hubbells
revenues result from sales of inventoried products or products
that have short periods of manufacture.
Competition
Hubbell experiences substantial competition in all categories of
its business, but does not compete with the same companies in
all of its product categories. The number and size of
competitors vary considerably depending on the product line.
Hubbell cannot specify with precision the number of competitors
in each product category or their relative market position.
However, some of its competitors are larger companies with
substantial financial and other resources. Hubbell considers
product performance, reliability, quality and technological
innovation as important factors relevant to all areas of its
business, and considers its reputation as a manufacturer of
quality products to be an important factor in its business. In
addition, product price, service levels and other factors can
affect Hubbells ability to compete.
Research,
Development & Engineering
Research, development and engineering expenditures represent
costs incurred in the experimental or laboratory sense aimed at
discovery
and/or
application of new knowledge in developing a new product,
process, or in bringing about a significant improvement in an
existing product or process. Research, development and
engineering expenses are recorded as a component of Cost of
goods sold. Expenses for research, development and engineering
were less than 1% of Cost of goods sold for each of the years
2004, 2005 and 2006.
Environment
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local
government requirements relating to the protection of employee
health and safety and the environment. The Company believes
that, as a general matter, its policies, practices and
procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of
environmental damage and personal injury to employees and
employees of our customers and that the handling, manufacture,
use and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances are in accord
with environmental laws and regulations.
Like other companies engaged in similar businesses, the Company
has incurred remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs for
site contamination and is a party to product liability and other
lawsuits and claims associated with environmental matters,
including past production of product containing toxic
substances. Additional lawsuits, claims and costs involving
environmental matters are likely to continue to arise in the
future. However, considering past experience, insurance coverage
and reserves, the Company does not anticipate that these matters
will have a material impact on earnings, capital expenditures,
or competitive position. See also Note 15
Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
8
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, Hubbell had approximately 12,000
salaried and hourly employees of which approximately 8,000 of
these employees or 67% are located in the United States.
Approximately 3,500 of these U.S. employees are represented
by nineteen labor unions. Hubbell considers its labor relations
to be satisfactory.
Our business, operating results, financial condition, and cash
flows may be impacted by a number of factors including, but not
limited to those set forth below. Any one of these factors could
cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results
or future anticipated results.
We
operate in markets that are subject to competitive pressures
that could affect selling prices or demand for our
products.
We compete on the basis of product performance, quality, service
and/or
price. Our competitive strategy is to design and manufacture
high quality products at the lowest possible cost. Our
competitors include companies that have greater sales and
financial resources than our Company. Competition could affect
future selling prices or demand for our products.
Lower
levels of economic activity in our end markets could adversely
affect our operating results.
Our businesses operate in several market segments including
commercial, industrial, residential, utility and
telecommunications. Operating results can be negatively impacted
by volatility in these markets. Future downturns in any of the
markets we serve could adversely affect our overall sales and
profitability.
We source
products and product materials from various suppliers located in
countries throughout the world. A disruption in the availability
or price of these products could impact our operating
results.
We use a variety of raw materials in the production of our
products including steel, brass, copper, aluminum, bronze, zinc,
nickel and plastics. We have multiple sources of supply for
these products and are not dependent on any single supplier.
However, significant shortages of these materials or price
increases could increase our operating costs and adversely
impact the competitive positions of our products which would
directly impact our results of operations.
We continue to increase the amount of product materials,
components and finished goods which are sourced from low cost
countries including Mexico, China, and other countries in Asia.
A political disruption or significant changes related to
transportation from one of these countries could affect the
availability of these materials and components which would
directly impact our results of operations.
We engage
in acquisitions and strategic investments and may encounter
difficulty in integrating these businesses.
We have pursued and will continue to seek potential acquisitions
and other strategic investments to complement and expand our
existing businesses within our core markets. In 2006 we
completed two acquisitions. The success of these transactions
will depend on our ability to integrate these businesses into
our operations. We may encounter difficulties in integrating
acquisitions into our operations and in managing strategic
investments. Therefore, we may not realize the degree or timing
of the benefits anticipated when we first enter into a
transaction.
Our
operating results may be impacted by actions related to our
lighting integration and rationalization program.
We continue to execute a multi-year program to integrate and
rationalize our lighting businesses through facility
consolidations, workforce reductions and product
rationalizations. These activities consist of complex
relocations of critical personnel and machinery and equipment,
as well as hiring and training of new personnel and, in some
cases, expansion or other modification to facilities. All of
these activities are thoroughly planned and under the direction
of experienced management personnel. However, the actions are
occurring simultaneous with normal
9
business operations and other initiatives. Therefore, there is a
risk that (1) we may not complete the activities on a
timely basis and incur duplicate or higher costs, (2) we
may lose essential personnel and knowledge in transition and
have to reestablish processes and procedures, and (3) our
normal operations could be disrupted and interfere with our
ability to manufacture and ship our products to satisfy the
demands of our customers.
Our
operating results may be impacted by actions related to our
enterprise-wide business system initiative.
We have substantially completed the implementation of SAP
software throughout most of our domestic businesses. This
activity involved the migration of multiple legacy systems and
users to a common SAP information platform. Throughout this
process, we changed the way we conduct business and
employees roles in processing and utilizing information.
In addition, certain interfaces with our customers and suppliers
have been impacted which resulted in changes to the tools we use
to take orders, procure material, schedule production, remit
billings, make payments and perform other business functions.
Based upon the complexity of this initiative, there is risk that
(1) we will incur additional costs to continue to enhance
the system and perform process reengineering, and (2) the
use of the new system or future implementations could result in
operating inefficiencies which could impact operating results or
our ability to perform necessary business transactions. All of
these risks could adversely impact our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
We are
subject to litigation and environmental regulations that may
adversely impact our operating results.
We are, and may in the future be, a party to a number of legal
proceedings and claims, including those involving product
liability and environmental matters, which could be significant.
Given the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we can offer no
assurance that a future adverse development related to existing
litigation or any future litigation will not have a material
adverse impact. We are also subject to various laws and
regulations relating to environmental protection and the
discharge of materials into the environment, and we could incur
substantial costs as a result of the noncompliance with or
liability for clean up or other costs or damages under
environmental laws.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None
10
Hubbells manufacturing and warehousing facilities,
classified by segment are located in the following areas. The
Company believes its manufacturing and warehousing facilities
are adequate to carry on its business activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Approximate Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Facilities
|
|
|
Area in Square Feet
|
|
Segment
|
|
Location
|
|
Warehouses
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Electrical segment
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
80,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
570,000
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
178,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
144,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
57,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
366,600
|
|
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
314,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
547,300
|
(1)
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
154,500
|
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
278,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
162,400
|
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,200
|
|
|
|
314,500
|
|
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
81,200
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
133,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
328,000
|
|
|
|
78,200
|
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,100
|
|
Power segment
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
288,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
170,700
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,071,600
|
|
|
|
46,400
|
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
89,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
152,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Technology segment
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
92,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,800
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,800
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
74,200
|
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shared between Electrical and Power segments. |
11
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
As described in Note 15 Commitments and
Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
the Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including
workers compensation, product liability and environmental
matters, including, for each, past production of product
containing toxic substances, which have arisen in the normal
course of its operations and with respect to which the Company
is self-insured for certain incidents at various amounts.
Management believes, considering its past experience, insurance
coverage and reserves, that the final outcome of such matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2006.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name.
|
|
Age(1)
|
|
Present Position
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
Timothy H. Powers
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Chairman of the
Board, President
and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Chairman of the Board since
September 15, 2004; President and Chief Executive Officer
since July 1, 2001; Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer September 21, 1998 to June 30, 2001;
previously Executive Vice President, Finance & Business
Development, Americas Region, Asea Brown Boveri.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David G. Nord
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Senior Vice
President and
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
Present position since
September 19, 2005; previously Chief Financial Officer of
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, a United Technologies company,
from April 2003 to September 2005, and Vice President,
Controller of United Technologies Corporation from October 2000
to March 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard W. Davies
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Vice President,
General Counsel
and Secretary
|
|
Present position since
January 1, 1996; General Counsel since 1987; Secretary
since 1982; Assistant Secretary 1980-1982; Assistant General
Counsel 1974-1987.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Biggart, Jr
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Vice President and
Treasurer
|
|
Present position since
January 1, 1996; Treasurer since 1987; Assistant Treasurer
1986-1987; Director of Taxes 1984-1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory F. Covino
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President,
Controller
|
|
Vice President since
December 6, 2005; Interim Chief Financial Officer from
November 5, 2004 to September 19, 2005; Corporate
Controller since June 6, 2002; Director, Corporate
Accounting 1999-2002; previously Assistant Controller, Otis
Elevator Company, a subsidiary of United Technologies Corp.
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name.
|
|
Age(1)
|
|
Present Position
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott H. Muse
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Group Vice
President
|
|
Present position since
April 27, 2002 (elected as an officer of the Company on
December 3, 2002); previously President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lighting Corporation of America, Inc.
(LCA) 1998-2002, and President of Progress Lighting,
Inc.
1993-1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Robert Murphy
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Senior Group Vice
President
|
|
Present position since May 7,
2001; Group Vice President 2000-2001; Senior Vice President
Marketing and Sales (Wiring Systems) 1985-1999; and various
sales positions (Wiring Systems) 1975-1985.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Smith
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Group Vice
President
|
|
Present position since May 7,
2001; Vice President, Marketing and Sales (Power Systems)
1998-2001; Vice President Sales, 1991-1998 of various Company
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary N. Amato
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Group Vice
President
|
|
Present position since October
2006; Vice President October 1997-September 2006; Vice President
and General Manager of the Companys Industrial Controls
Divisions (ICD) 1989-1997; Marketing Manager, ICD, April
1988-March 1989.
|
There are no family relationships between any of the above-named
executive officers.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of February 20, 2007. |
13
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The Companys Class A and Class B common stocks
are principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbols HUBA and HUBB. The following
tables provide information on market prices, dividends declared,
number of common shareholders, and repurchases by the Company of
shares of its Class A and Class B common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices (Dollars Per Share)
|
|
Common A
|
|
|
Common B
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2006 First quarter
|
|
|
47.30
|
|
|
|
40.10
|
|
|
|
51.52
|
|
|
|
43.78
|
|
2006 Second quarter
|
|
|
49.08
|
|
|
|
41.80
|
|
|
|
53.24
|
|
|
|
45.50
|
|
2006 Third quarter
|
|
|
45.68
|
|
|
|
42.17
|
|
|
|
49.50
|
|
|
|
45.62
|
|
2006 Fourth quarter
|
|
|
50.82
|
|
|
|
43.24
|
|
|
|
53.28
|
|
|
|
43.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 First quarter
|
|
|
49.65
|
|
|
|
45.15
|
|
|
|
54.00
|
|
|
|
47.89
|
|
2005 Second quarter
|
|
|
46.54
|
|
|
|
39.25
|
|
|
|
50.79
|
|
|
|
42.67
|
|
2005 Third quarter
|
|
|
44.06
|
|
|
|
40.45
|
|
|
|
47.90
|
|
|
|
43.59
|
|
2005 Fourth quarter
|
|
|
45.95
|
|
|
|
41.32
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared (Cents Per Share)
|
|
Common A
|
|
|
Common B
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Common Shareholders of Record
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
3,243
|
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
3,687
|
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
14
Purchases
of Equity Securities
In February 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock
repurchase program and authorized the repurchase of up to
$100 million of the Companys Class A and
Class B Common Stock to be completed over a three year
period. The repurchase program commenced in August 2006 upon
completion of the previous 2005 program. Stock repurchases are
being implemented through open market and privately negotiated
transactions.
On August 3, 2006, in connection with the previously
announced stock repurchase program, the Company established a
prearranged repurchase plan (the 10b5-1 Plan)
intended to comply with the requirements of
Rule 10b5-1
and
Rule 10b-18
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Act).
The 10b5-1 Plan facilitates the ongoing repurchase of the
Companys Class A and Class B Common Stock under
its repurchase program during times when it otherwise might be
prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of
self-imposed trading blackout periods. Pursuant to the 10b5-1
Plan, a broker appointed by the Company has the authority to
repurchase, without further direction from the Company, up to
750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and up to
750,000 shares of Class B Common Stock during the
period commencing on August 4, 2006 and expiring on
August 3, 2007, subject to conditions specified in the
10b5-1 Plan and unless earlier terminated. All the
750,000 shares of the Class B Common Stock have been
repurchased under the 10b5-1 Plan. There is no guarantee as to
the number of Class A Common Stock that will be repurchased
under this plan, and the Company may terminate this plan at any
time. Depending upon market conditions, the Company also expects
to continue to conduct discretionary repurchases in privately
negotiated transactions during its normal trading windows.
The following table summarizes the Companys repurchase
activity during the quarter ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares That
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Class A Shares
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Under the 2006
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
Program
|
|
Period
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
(000s)
|
|
|
Balance as of
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,400
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
46.82
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
49.12
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
64,400
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
47.31
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
49.91
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
December 2006
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
45.16
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
46.14
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
50,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
46.48
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
$
|
48.07
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
50,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Corporate
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the total return to shareholders on
the Companys Class B Common Stock during the five
years ended December 31, 2006, with a cumulative total
return on the (i) Standard & Poors MidCap
400 (S&P MidCap 400), (ii) Hubbell
Self-Constructed Peer Group Index (Peer Group), and
(iii) Standard & Poors Super Composite 1500.
The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31,
2001 in the Companys Class B Common Stock and in each
of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
In prior years, the Companys Corporate Performance graph
compared the Companys Class B Common Stock performance
with the performance of (i) the S&P MidCap 400 and
(ii) the Peer Group. Beginning next year, the Company will
substitute the S&P Super Composite 1500 for the Peer
Group. The S&P MidCap 400 has and will continue to be used
because the Company is a member of this group. The S&P Super
Composite 1500 has been chosen to replace the Peer Group as the
MidCap 400 forms a part of the Super Composite 1500 and the
Company is also in this group. We believe the S&P Super
Composite 1500 is a more representative comparison than the
Peer Group, which has become relatively narrow in recent years.
The Peer Group consists of corporations whose businesses are
representative of the Companys business segments and,
therefore, served as a base for comparing total return to
shareholders. The corporations that comprise the original Peer
Group are (a) Cooper Industries, Inc. (b) Emerson
Electric Co., (c) Thomas & Betts Corporation,
(d) Acuity Brands, Inc. and (e) Woodhead Industries,
Inc. (Woodhead). The Peer Group has been weighted in
accordance with each corporations market capitalization
(closing stock price multiplied by the number of shares
outstanding) as of the beginning of each of the years covered by
the performance graph. As a result of Woodhead being acquired
during 2006, Woodhead has been dropped from the 2006 period. For
the December 2006 data points, the Woodhead portion has been
distributed among the remaining four members of the Peer Group,
weighted according to their market capitalization. The weighted
return for each year was calculated by assuming the products
obtained by multiplying (a) the percentage that each
corporations market capitalization represents of the total
market capitalization of all corporations in the index for each
such year by (b) the total shareholder return for that
corporation for such year.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among
Hubbell Incorporated, The S&P Midcap 400 Index,
The S&P 1500 Super Composite Index And A Peer Group
|
|
* |
$100 invested on 12/31/01 in stock or index-including
reinvestment of dividends. Year ending December 31.
|
Copyright
©
2007, Standard and Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm
16
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following summary should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes contained herein
(dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
OPERATIONS, years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,414.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,770.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,587.8
|
|
Gross
profit(1)
|
|
$
|
656.8
|
|
|
$
|
595.0
|
|
|
$
|
561.9
|
|
|
$
|
481.5
|
|
|
$
|
409.1
|
|
Special charges,
net(1)
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
233.9
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
226.8
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
212.6
|
|
|
$
|
171.9
|
|
|
$
|
138.5
|
|
Operating income as % of sales
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
(6)
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
115.1
|
|
|
$
|
83.2
|
(5)(6)
|
Net income as a % of sales
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Net income to common
shareholders average equity
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
Earnings per share
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
After cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.38
|
(6)
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
Average number of common shares
outstanding diluted
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
Cost of acquisitions, net of cash
acquired
|
|
$
|
145.7
|
|
|
$
|
54.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
270.2
|
|
FINANCIAL POSITION, at
year-end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
432.1
|
|
|
$
|
459.6
|
|
|
$
|
483.1
|
|
|
$
|
420.9
|
|
|
$
|
341.6
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,751.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,656.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,514.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,418.6
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
|
$
|
228.8
|
|
|
$
|
299.0
|
|
|
$
|
298.8
|
|
|
$
|
298.7
|
|
Debt to total
capitalization(7)
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Common shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,015.5
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
998.1
|
|
|
$
|
944.3
|
|
|
$
|
829.7
|
|
|
$
|
744.2
|
|
Per share
|
|
$
|
16.62
|
|
|
$
|
16.15
|
|
|
$
|
15.33
|
|
|
$
|
13.80
|
|
|
$
|
12.47
|
|
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, at
year-end
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
|
|
11,476
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company recorded pretax special charges in each of the years
presented. Below is a breakdown of special charges representing
the total of amounts recorded in Special charges, net, and Cost
of goods sold, the latter of which impacts Gross profit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Charges by Program
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Lighting business integration and
rationalization program
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
Wiring Device factory closure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 streamlining program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Further details with respect to special charges are included
within Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Note 2 Special Charges of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). The
adoption of this standard resulted in a charge to equity of
$36.8 million, net of tax. |
|
(3) |
|
In 2006 and 2005, operating income includes stock-based
compensation expense of $11.8 million and
$0.7 million, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
In 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded tax benefits of
$10.8 million and $10.2 million, respectively, in
Provision for income taxes related to the completion of
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
examinations for years through 2003. |
|
(5) |
|
In 2002, the Company recorded a tax benefit of
$10.8 million in connection with the settlement of a fully
reserved tax issue with the IRS and a reduction of tax expense
as a result of filing amended Federal income tax returns for
years
1995-2000
related to increased credits for research and development
activities. |
|
(6) |
|
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 142,
the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$25.4 million, net of tax, to write-off goodwill associated
with one of the reporting units in the Industrial Technology
segment. The impairment charge was reported as the cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle in 2002. |
|
(7) |
|
Debt to total capitalization is defined as total debt as a
percentage of the sum of total debt and shareholders
equity. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW OF THE BUSINESS
2006 was a particularly challenging year for our Company. Coming
into the year, we had identified and communicated that we
expected 2006 to be a peak year of key initiatives and change as
we focused on multiple projects, all of which required
significant investments of resources and the time and attention
of our management team. The combination of working towards
completion of our initiatives and adjusting to higher levels of
orders and sales
year-over-year
resulted in operational inefficiencies and higher costs. As a
result, our operating performance was not to our level of
satisfaction as operating margins and cash flow declined
year-over-year.
An update of key initiatives is as follows:
Common, enterprise-wide information system. We
have substantially completed a multi-year program to implement
SAP software across all domestic businesses in a series of
staged implementations. The implementations began in the fourth
quarter of 2004 and continued through the fourth quarter of
2006. As of December 31, 2006, SAP has been installed at
almost all of the Companys domestic businesses. Total
program spending on this business initiative approximated
$75 million, pretax, from inception in late 2003 through
the end of 2006 of which approximately 61% was
capitalized, and is being amortized over 5 years, and 39%
was expensed as incurred. In connection with the implementation
of this program, we expensed approximately $6.7 million in
2006, $8.3 million in 2005 and $10.1 million in 2004,
primarily related to external consulting costs. In 2006, we
capitalized approximately $10.9 million of costs (primarily
recorded in Intangible assets and other in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets) associated with the program
compared with $18.6 million and $12.8 million,
capitalized in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Amortization expense
on the amounts capitalized totaled $8.1 million in 2006,
$4.1 million in 2005 and $0.6 million in 2004. Program
expenses are allocated to our three segments on the basis of
each segments actual net sales as a percentage of
consolidated net sales.
Lighting Business Integration and Rationalization
Program. We have substantially completed a
multi-year program to integrate and rationalize our lighting
businesses following the acquisition of Lighting Corporation of
America, (LCA) in 2002. Actions include facility
consolidations, workforce reductions and product
rationalizations. Integral to this initiative is increased
product and component sourcing from low cost countries.
Annualized savings from these actions are estimated to range
from $20-$25 million, pretax, a majority of which has been
18
realized through December 31, 2006. Savings have been
realized primarily in the form of increased manufacturing
productivity and lower administrative costs in the affected
lighting businesses. To date, these savings have been used to
offset cost increases and other competitive pressures as opposed
to adding directly to the profitability of the Electrical
segment.
As an integral part of the program, we are nearing completion of
a new lighting headquarters building located in Greenville,
South Carolina. Construction of the building began
in early 2005 and will be completed in the first quarter of
2007. The project is expected to cost approximately
$41 million of which approximately $32 million has
been capitalized through December 31, 2006.
Acquisitions. The Company spent a total of
$145.5 million, net of cash acquired, on two acquisitions
this year, one of which was added to the Power segment and one
to the Industrial Technology segment. Both acquisitions were
immediately accretive to net income of the Company. These
businesses are expected to add approximately $81 million in
annual sales to the Power segment and approximately
$25 million to the Industrial Technology segment with
operating margin in line with their respective segments. We
expect to continue to pursue potential acquisitions that would
enhance our core electrical component businesses. Our ability to
finance substantial growth continues to be strong.
We are currently focused on three key objectives in order to
improve the operational and financial performance of our
Company. We expect to make substantial progress on these
objectives over the next year. We believe the action items
described below will provide the means for our Company to grow
and deliver strong returns to our shareholders.
During the latter part of 2005 and into 2006, we experienced
significant increases in the cost of commodity raw materials
used in the production of our products including steel, copper,
aluminum and zinc, as well as in certain purchased electronic
components such as ballasts. As a result, multiple increases in
the selling price of our products were announced and implemented
during this time period. While a significant portion of the cost
increases were recovered during 2006, further pricing actions
have been taken or are expected to be completed in 2007
primarily in the Electrical and Power segments.
Global sourcing. We remain focused on
expanding our global product and component sourcing and supplier
cost reduction program. We continue to consolidate suppliers,
utilize reverse auctions, and partner with vendors to shorten
lead times, improve quality and delivery and reduce costs.
Product and component purchases representing approximately 26%
of total purchases are currently sourced from low cost countries
and we expect to continue to increase this amount toward a 40%
goal over the next several years.
Freight and Logistics. Transporting our
products from suppliers, to warehouses, and ultimately to our
customers, is a major cost to our Company. While such costs are
not unique to our Company, we have identified areas of
improvement to increase the effectiveness of our freight and
logistics processes to both lower costs and improve our service
to customers.
During 2006, initiatives including the system implementation,
restructuring and new product launches limited our ability to
achieve productivity improvements. Normally, strong increases in
underlying economic demand would have provided us with an
opportunity to leverage additional sales volume to increase our
operating margins. However, the significant incremental volume
put pressure on the organization. As a result, we experienced
negative productivity related to manufacturing, logistics, and
to a lesser extent, Selling & administrative expenses
(S&A). In addition, cash flow from operations
was lower than 2005 primarily resulting from an increase in
working capital.
In 2007, we expect to focus our productivity improvement in the
following areas:
Improve Factory Efficiency. Leveraging the
features and added visibility to data facilitated by our new
business system, efforts are already underway to standardize
best practices in inventory management and production
19
|
|
|
planning and scheduling to improve manufacturing throughput and
reduce costs. Lead times have been reduced to historic averages
following disruption caused by higher volumes and our
initiatives in 2006. We are focused on systemic improvements in
methods to further reduce lead times and improve service levels
to our customers.
|
Working Capital Efficiency. Working capital
efficiency is principally measured as the percentage of trade
working capital (inventory plus accounts receivable, less
accounts payable) divided by annual net sales. In 2006, working
capital as a percentage of sales was 21.9% compared to 17.7% in
2005. We will continue to focus on improving our working capital
efficiency with a particular emphasis on improved inventory
management.
Transformation of business processes. We will
continue our long-term initiative of applying lean process
improvement techniques throughout the enterprise to eliminate
waste and improve efficiency and reliability.
OUTLOOK
Our outlook for 2007 in key areas is as follows:
Markets
and Sales
We anticipate overall economic conditions to remain positive
throughout 2007 in most of our major end use markets, with the
notable exception of the residential market. Industrial and
commercial construction markets are expected to remain favorable
as evidenced by higher levels of architecture billings, a
leading indicator of future construction spending. Domestic
utility markets are expected to grow in line with the overall
economy. We do not anticipate any significant increase in demand
for our power products in 2007 resulting from infrastructure
changes in the utility industry. Residential markets are
expected to decline significantly in 2007 due to rising interest
rates and an oversupply of inventory. This outlook for our
markets assumes no shocks to the economy, in particular higher
energy prices, which could dampen consumer spending and business
investments. In addition, global demand for commodities will
continue to drive volatility and upward pricing pressure on
these costs. We expect to recover higher commodity and energy
costs with increases in selling prices enacted in 2006 and those
planned for 2007. We expect overall growth in 2007 net
sales versus 2006 to be in a range of 6%-8%, excluding effects
of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Sales
increases compared to 2006 are expected to be led by our Power
and Industrial Technology segments while the Electrical segment
should experience more modest growth due to lower residential
product sales. The full year impact of our 2006 acquisitions is
expected to contribute two percentage points of these amounts.
The carryover impact of previously implemented price increases
should comprise approximately one to two percentage points of
the
year-over-year
sales growth.
Operating
Results
Full year 2007 operating profit margin is expected to increase
approximately one percentage point compared to 2006. Several key
initiatives are expected to benefit operating margins including
expansion of global product sourcing initiatives, improved
factory productivity, and the substantial completion of key
initiatives and reduction of associated costs including the SAP
implementation at our domestic businesses and the Lighting
Business Integration and Rationalization Program. In addition,
we expect selling price increases in 2006 as well as additional
planned increases in 2007 will offset higher levels of raw
material commodity costs and higher energy related costs.
However, commodity and energy costs are expected to remain
volatile and further increases in these costs in 2007 may not be
fully offset with price increases.
Taxation
We estimate the effective tax rate in 2007 will be approximately
29.5% compared with 28.6% reported in 2006. The increase is
primarily due to an anticipated higher level of
U.S. taxable income.
Earnings
Per Share
Overall, earnings per diluted share is expected to be in the
range of $2.90-$3.15.
20
Cash
Flow
We expect to increase working capital efficiency in 2007
primarily as a result of improvements in the procurement and
management of inventory levels. Capital spending in 2007 is
expected to be approximately $10-$20 million lower than in
2006 primarily as a result of the completion of our new lighting
headquarters facility and the completion of the SAP
implementation at our domestic businesses. We expect spending
from a combination of share repurchases
and/or
acquisitions in 2007 to approximate $150-$200 million. In
February 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new stock
repurchase program and authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of Class A and Class B Common Stock
to be completed within the next two years. This program will be
implemented upon completion of the February 2006 program. Total
repurchases may vary depending upon the level of other investing
activities. Free cash flow (defined as cash flow from operations
less capital spending) in 2007 is expected to be in the range of
$175$190 million.
Growth
Our growth strategy contemplates acquisitions in our core
businesses. The rate and extent to which appropriate acquisition
opportunities become available, acquired companies are
integrated and anticipated cost savings are achieved can affect
our future results. During 2007, we anticipate investing in
acquisitions below the level in 2006; however, actual spending
may vary depending upon the timing and availability of
appropriate acquisition opportunities.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Our operations are classified into three segments: Electrical,
Power, and Industrial Technology. For a complete description of
the Companys segments, see Part I, Item 1. of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Within these segments, Hubbell primarily serves customers in the
commercial and residential construction, industrial, utility,
and telecommunications industries.
The table below approximates percentages of our total
2006 net sales generated by the market segments indicated.
Served
Market Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication/
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Power
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Hubbell Consolidated
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Our served market segments have remained relatively consistent
with 2005. Market conditions in the Power and Industrial
Technology segments were generally favorable in 2006 due to the
higher levels of utility demand and a strong worldwide oil and
gas market. Principal markets affecting the Electrical segment
were mixed as improvements in commercial construction and
industrial markets were offset by lower levels of activity in
the residential / do-it-yourself markets.
21
Summary
of Consolidated Results (in millions, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,414.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,757.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,431.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
656.8
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
595.0
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
|
|
561.9
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
Selling & administrative
expenses
|
|
|
415.6
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
357.9
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
333.9
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
233.9
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
226.8
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
212.6
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
diluted
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
Compared to 2005
Net
Sales
Consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006
were $2.4 billion, an increase of 15% over the year ended
December 31, 2005 with all segments contributing to the
increase.
The majority of the
year-over-year
increase is due to strong end user demand as a result of
improved economic conditions in most of our served markets,
contributions from current and prior year acquisitions and
higher selling prices. The impact of acquisitions accounted for
approximately four percentage points of the sales increase in
2006 compared to 2005. We estimate that selling price increases
accounted for approximately two percentage points of the
year-over-year
increase in sales. Refer to the table above under Served
Market Segments for further details on how underlying
market demand impacts each segments revenues. Also refer
to Segment Results within this Managements
Discussion and Analysis for more detailed information on
performance by segment.
Gross
Profit
The consolidated gross profit margin for 2006 decreased to 27.2%
compared to 28.3% in 2005. Production and delivery
inefficiencies were experienced in certain of our Electrical and
Power segment businesses compared to the prior year. Further,
higher
year-over-year
costs throughout each segment in the areas of commodity raw
materials negatively impacted gross profit margins by
approximately two and one half percentage points. These items
were partially offset by increased sales volume in 2006 compared
to 2005, selling price increases, lower product costs from
strategic sourcing initiatives and completed actions within our
lighting Program.
In total, we estimate that price increases of approximately 2%
of net sales were realized to offset higher raw material and
transportation cost increases of approximately 2.5% of sales,
resulting in net unrecovered cost increases of approximately
$15 million. By segment, net benefits were realized in the
Industrial Technology segment, while the Electrical and Power
segments experienced cost increases in excess of selling price
increases. Higher costs of certain raw materials, primarily
copper, aluminum, zinc and nickel, were major challenges in 2006
as they occurred across each of our businesses. These increases
required us to increase selling prices which, particularly in
our Electrical and Power segments, were often not fully realized
or required up to
90-120 days
to become effective and begin to offset the higher costs, which
in many cases were immediate.
Selling &
Administrative Expenses
S&A expenses increased 16% compared to 2005 primarily due to
higher selling and commission expenses associated with increased
sales, stock-based compensation and expenses associated with new
product launches. As a percentage of sales, S&A expenses
increased to 17.2% in 2006 compared to 17.0% in 2005. The
increase was primarily due to higher expenses associated with
stock-based compensation which increased S&A as a percentage
of sales by approximately one-half of one percentage point.
22
Special
Charges
Full year operating results in 2006, 2005 and 2004 include
pretax special charges related to (1) programs approved
following our acquisition of LCA in April 2002, which were
undertaken to integrate and rationalize the combined lighting
operations, and (2) other capacity reduction actions, all
within the Electrical segment.
The following table summarizes activity by year with respect to
special charges for the three years ending December 31,
2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY OF COSTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
Year/Program
|
|
Other Benefit Costs
|
|
|
Integration
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Write-Downs*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
Other capacity reduction
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
Other capacity reduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Included in Cost of goods sold
|
Lighting
Business Integration and Rationalization Program (the
Program or Lighting
Program)
The integration and rationalization of our lighting operations
is a multi-year initiative that began in 2002 and was
substantially completed in 2006. Individual projects within the
Program consisted of factory, office and warehouse closures,
personnel realignments, and costs to streamline and combine
product offerings. From the start of the Program in 2002,
amounts expensed totaled approximately $54 million and
amounts capitalized have been approximately $44 million.
Capital expenditures are primarily related to the construction
of a new lighting headquarters expected to be completed in the
first quarter of 2007. In addition to the amounts incurred
through December 31, 2006, we anticipate an additional
$10-$13 million will be incurred in 2007 for the completion
of projects, including approximately $3-$5 million of
expense and approximately $7-$8 million in capital. Program
costs related to severance, asset impairments, and facility
closures in conjunction with exit activities are generally
reflected as Special charges, net within the Consolidated
Statement of Income. Inventory write-downs related to exit
activities are recorded as a component of Cost of goods sold.
Other costs associated with the Program are recorded as Cost of
goods sold or S&A expenses depending on the nature of the
cost. State and local incentives consisting primarily of
property tax credits, job credits and site development funds are
available in various forms, and are expected to offset portions
of both the cost of construction and future operating costs of
the lighting headquarters facility.
The Program is comprised of three phases. Program expenses by
phase, including special charges and other expense costs, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase I
|
|
|
Phase II
|
|
|
Phase III
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2002
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
2003
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
2004
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
2006
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.3
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
54.1
|
|
23
Phase I of the Program began in 2002 soon after the LCA
acquisition was completed and consisted of many individually
identified actions. Phase I activities were focused on
integrating the acquired operations with Hubbells legacy
lighting operations. In accordance with applicable accounting
rules, amounts were expensed either as actions were approved and
announced or as costs were incurred. Reorganization actions
primarily consisted of factory closures, warehouse
consolidations and workforce realignment. These actions were
completed as of December 31, 2006.
Phase II of the Program began in 2004. Many of the actions
contemplated were similar to actions completed or underway from
Phase I. However, these actions were increasingly focused
on rationalizing the combined businesses. In the second quarter
of 2004, a commercial products plant closure was announced and
charges were recorded, primarily for asset impairments. In the
third quarter of 2004, we announced two actions:
(1) consolidation of selling, administrative and
engineering support functions within the commercial lighting
businesses, and (2) the selection of Greenville, South
Carolina as the site for a new lighting headquarters facility to
be constructed. In addition, in the 2004 fourth quarter, a
further move of commercial lighting manufacturing to Mexico was
approved.
In 2005, we announced the final Phase II action consisting
of the consolidation and closure of a commercial lighting leased
office complex. No new Phase II actions were taken in 2006.
In total, Phase II costs expensed in 2006 totaled
$4.0 million consisting primarily of severance and facility
integration in connection with the commercial products move to
Mexico. Through December 31, 2006, $21.5 million of
total expenses have been recorded for plant consolidations and
the consolidation of support functions related to Phase II
actions. Approximately 80% of the total amount expensed has been
associated with cash outlays. The new headquarters facility
represents the largest remaining capital cost forecast. Cash
outlays in 2007 are expected to range from $2-$3 million,
excluding capital costs of approximately $13 million, which
includes $5.6 million of costs accrued and capitalized in
2006.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, the first Phase III action
was approved related to the consolidation and relocation of
administrative and engineering functions of a commercial
lighting facility to South Carolina. In connection with this
approval, we recorded a non-cash pension curtailment charge of
approximately $1.3 million. Approximately 85 employees
were affected by this action. In 2006, $5.0 million of
Phase III costs were expensed. During the fourth quarter,
the closure of a commercial products factory in Cincinnati, Ohio
was announced and charges of $3.0 million were recorded
related to asset impairments and a portion of the severance and
benefits costs expected to be incurred. In addition,
$2.0 million was recorded primarily related to severance
costs associated with the office closure. All but
$2.4 million of asset impairments are expected to result in
cash outlays. In 2007, an additional $1-$2 million of
Phase III program costs are expected to be expensed to
complete Phase III programs. Cash expenditures should
comprise a majority of this amount.
Other
Capacity Reduction Actions
In addition to the Program within the lighting business, in
2004, we announced the closure of a 92,000 square foot
wiring device factory in Puerto Rico. Increased productivity
facilitated by lean initiatives and cost savings opportunities
resulting from low cost country sourcing contributed to the
decision to close this leased facility. As a result,
$7.2 million in special charges were recorded in 2004 in
the Electrical segment of which $4.9 million related to
impairments of fixed assets, $2.0 million provided for
severance costs and $0.3 million related to facility exit
costs. During 2005, the factory closed and substantially all
employees left the Company. In the second quarter of 2005, we
recorded an additional $0.9 million of special charges
associated with this closure, of which $0.3 million related
to inventory write-downs and $0.6 million related to
additional facility exit costs. Annual pretax savings from these
actions were approximately $4 million in 2006, with the
entire amount benefiting Cost of goods sold in the Electrical
segment. Net benefits actually realized in the segment have been
minimized as a result of cost increases and other competitive
pressures.
Additional information with respect to special charges is
included in Note 2 Special Charges included in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating
Income
Operating income increased $7.1 million, or 3% in 2006
compared to 2005 as a result of higher sales levels and
$3.4 million of lower pretax special charges (including
amounts charged to Cost of goods sold). Operating margins
24
of 9.7% in 2006 declined compared to 10.8% in 2005 as a result
of lower gross profit margins and higher S&A expenses as a
percentage of sales.
Other
Income/Expense
In 2006, investment income decreased $4.4 million versus
2005 due to lower average investment balances as a result of
funding acquisitions in 2005 and 2006, as well as funding higher
working capital. Interest expense decreased $3.9 million in
2006 compared to 2005 due to a lower level of fixed rate
indebtedness in 2006 compared to 2005. In October 2005, we
repaid $100 million of senior notes upon maturity. Other
expense, net in 2006 was $2.1 million of expense compared
to $1.3 million of expense in 2005 primarily due to higher
net foreign currency transaction losses.
Income
Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 28.6% in 2006 compared to 23.5% in
2005. The 2005 consolidated effective tax rate reflected the
impact of tax benefits of $10.8 million recorded in
connection with the closing of an IRS examination of the
Companys 2002 and 2003 tax returns. This benefit reduced
the statutory tax rate by 5.1 percentage points in 2005.
Adjusting for the IRS audit settlement in 2005, the effective
tax rate in 2006 is consistent with the prior year.
Net
Income and Earnings Per Share
Net income and earnings per diluted share in 2006 declined
versus 2005 as a result of lower operating profit, higher income
taxes and unfavorable other income/expense, partially offset by
lower special charges.
Segment
Results
Electrical
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
1,631.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,496.8
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
132.7
|
|
|
$
|
142.7
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Electrical segment net sales increased 9% in 2006 versus 2005
primarily as a result of improved underlying demand in the
commercial and industrial construction markets and higher
selling prices. Each of the businesses within the
segment wiring systems, electrical products and
lighting fixtures experienced
year-over-year
increases. Higher selling prices were implemented and have been
realized in most of the businesses within the segment in an
effort to recover cost increases, primarily related to higher
commodity raw material and freight costs.
Sales of lighting fixtures increased in line with the overall
segment percentage with the majority of the growth from our
commercial and industrial (C&I) application
products and more modest growth in residential products. The
C&I lighting businesses increased due to higher levels of
commercial construction throughout the U.S. generating
increases in lighting fixture project sales. An industry-wide
price increase within C&I lighting in June 2006 resulted in
a spike in order input in the second quarter of the year and,
consequently, strong
year-over-year
shipments in the second and third quarters. Sales of residential
lighting fixture products were up modestly in 2006 versus 2005,
consistent with underlying residential markets, as a majority of
first half sales increases
year-over-year
were offset by second half declines.
Wiring system sales increased
year-over-year
by more than 10% due to higher demand in both industrial and
commercial markets. Rough-in electrical sales increased slightly
as a result of higher selling prices, partially offset by lower
retail volume. Sales of harsh and hazardous products increased
year-over-year
by more than 20% primarily due to higher oil and gas project
shipments related to strong market conditions worldwide and the
favorable impact of an acquisition completed in the third
quarter of 2005.
25
Operating margin in the segment was lower in 2006 versus 2005,
despite a better than one percentage point improvement from
higher sales, due to production and delivery inefficiencies in
certain lighting facilities affected by restructuring actions
and the SAP system implementation, which almost entirely offset
the margin improvement from higher sales. In addition, higher
commodity raw material and freight costs in excess of selling
price increases negatively affected the segments operating
margin by approximately 1.5 percentage points. Savings from
completed actions associated with the lighting Program together
with lower special charges in 2006 compared with 2005 were also
more than offset by higher S&A costs, including SAP related
costs, and a non-recurring $4.9 million prior year gain on
sale of a building.
Power
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
573.7
|
|
|
$
|
455.6
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
78.6
|
|
|
$
|
69.0
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
Power segment net sales increased 26% in 2006 versus the prior
year due to the impact of acquisitions and higher levels of
utility spending facilitated by higher levels of economic
activity in the U.S. and selling price increases. The
acquisition of Delmar in the third quarter of last year as well
as the Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. acquisition completed in the
second quarter of 2006 accounted for approximately one half of
the sales increase in 2006 compared to 2005. Price increases
were implemented across most product lines throughout 2005 and
into 2006 where costs have risen due to increased metal and
energy costs. We estimate that price increases accounted for
approximately 4 percentage points of the
year-over-year
sales increase. Operating margins decreased in 2006 versus 2005,
despite an approximate two percentage point improvement from
higher sales, as a result of commodity cost increases in excess
of selling price increases, factory inefficiencies, higher SAP
related costs and increased transportation costs. The commodity
cost increases, primarily steel, aluminum, copper and zinc,
outpaced our actions to increase selling prices. We estimate
that the negative impact in 2006 of cost increases in excess of
pricing actions resulted in a reduction of operating margin of
approximately two percentage points for this segment. In
addition, the segment experienced factory inefficiencies due in
part to the disruption caused by the system implementation.
Industrial
Technology Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
209.4
|
|
|
$
|
152.5
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
34.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Industrial Technology segment net sales increased 37% in 2006
versus 2005 primarily due to the improvement in industrial
market activity as evidenced by higher manufacturing output and
rising capacity utilization rates. All businesses within the
segment reported
year-over-year
sales increases. In addition, we acquired two businesses in 2005
and one in October 2006 which accounted for approximately one
third of the segment sales increase. We estimate that price
increases accounted for approximately three percentage points of
the
year-over-year
sales increase. Operating income and margins for the full year
2006 improved significantly versus 2005 primarily as a result of
increased volume, selling price increases in excess of commodity
cost increases and cost savings associated with outsourcing and
other productivity improvements.
26
2005
Compared to 2004
Net
Sales
Consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005
were $2.1 billion, an increase of 5.6% over the year ended
December 31, 2004. The increase was led by our Power and
Industrial Technology segments where sales increased by 18% and
17%, respectively, over amounts reported in 2004.
The majority of the increase in net sales in 2005 versus 2004
resulted from the carryover effect of price increases
implemented throughout 2004 and 2005, higher storm related
shipments in the Power segment and several small acquisitions.
Although underlying demand in many of our core markets improved
year-over-year,
softness in commercial construction markets, which represented
our largest served market, negatively affected orders and sales
particularly in the Electrical segment. We estimate that selling
price increases accounted for approximately 2-3 percentage
points of the
year-over-year
increase in sales. Refer to the table above under Served
Market Segments for further details on how the underlying
market demand can impact each segments revenues. Also
refer to Segment Results within this
Managements Discussion and Analysis for more detailed
information on performance by segment.
Gross
Profit
The consolidated gross profit margin for 2005 improved slightly
to 28.3% compared to 28.2% in 2004. The improvement in gross
profit margin was attributable to the favorable effects of
higher selling prices in excess of commodity cost increases,
lower product costs from strategic sourcing initiatives,
productivity gains, and cost savings from our lighting
integration and rationalization program. Substantially
offsetting these increases versus 2004 were the negative impact
of unabsorbed factory costs in certain of our manufacturing
plants as a result of lower unit volumes and higher
year-over-year
energy prices, which negatively impacted costs including
transportation and utilities.
In total, we estimate that price increases of approximately
2%-3% of net sales were realized to offset raw material, energy
and transportation cost increases of approximately 2.5%-3.5% of
sales, resulting in net unrecovered cost increases of
approximately $10-$15 million. By segment, net benefits
were realized in the Power and Industrial Technology segments,
while the Electrical segment experienced cost increases in
excess of price increases. Higher costs of certain raw materials
along with higher energy and transportation costs were a major
challenge in 2005 as they occurred across each of our
businesses. These increases required us to increase selling
prices which, particularly in our Electrical segment, were often
not fully realized or required up to
90-120 days
to become effective and begin to offset the higher costs, which
in many cases were immediate.
In our lighting business, gross profit margins declined as a
result of lower volume, unabsorbed factory costs and higher
transportation costs partially offset by cost savings associated
with our lighting integration and rationalization program. Our
wiring systems business reported lower gross profit percentages
in 2005 versus the prior year due to factory inefficiencies, due
in part to the implementation of SAP, higher transportation and
utility costs and increased costs associated with the launch of
new products. Power segment gross margin improved for the year
primarily due to higher volume, increased selling prices and
improved factory performance. Gross profit margins in our
Industrial Technology segment improved as a result of higher
volume and price increases in excess of commodity cost increases.
Selling &
Administrative Expenses
S&A expenses increased 7.2% compared to 2004. The increase
is due to higher expenses associated with the SAP
enterprise-wide information system, new product launches and an
unusual item recorded in the first quarter of 2005. These
increases were partially offset by a $4.9 million gain on
sale of a building that was recorded in the fourth quarter of
2005. The SAP information systems initiative generated higher
year-over-year
costs primarily due to higher resource needs in support of both
legacy and SAP information platforms and amortization of
capitalized implementation costs. The unusual item consisted of
$4.6 million, pretax, of transactional expenses in support
of our strategic growth initiatives.
27
Special
Charges
See separate discussion under 2006 Compared to 2005
within this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Operating
Income
Operating income increased 7% primarily due to higher sales
levels and $5.8 million of lower pretax special charges
(including amounts charged to Cost of goods sold). Operating
margins of 10.8% in 2005 were relatively flat compared to 10.7%
in 2004 as a result of higher sales, improved gross profit
margins and lower special charges, partially offset by higher
S&A expenses.
Other
Income/Expense
In 2005, investment income increased $3.0 million versus
2004 due to higher average cash and investment balances and
higher average interest rates earned on cash and investments.
Interest income in 2004 also included $1.0 million related
to a tax settlement in the prior year. Interest expense was
$19.3 million in 2005 compared to $20.6 million in
2004. The decrease was due to a lower level of fixed rate
indebtedness in 2005 compared to 2004. In October 2005, we
repaid $100 million of senior notes upon maturity. Other
income (expense), net, in 2005 was $1.3 million of expense
compared to $1.2 million of expense in 2004.
Income
Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 23.5% in 2005 compared to 21.6% in
2004. The 2005 consolidated effective tax rate reflected the
impact of tax benefits of $10.8 million recorded in
connection with the closing of an IRS examination of the
Companys 2002 and 2003 tax returns. The 2004 rate
reflected the impact of tax benefits of $10.2 million
recorded in connection with the closing of an IRS examination of
our tax returns through 2001, which included refund claims for
the years 1995 through 2000 related to research and development
activities during these years. These benefits reduced the
statutory tax rate by 5.1 percentage points and
5.3 percentage points in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We have certain operations in Puerto Rico that were eligible for
U.S. tax benefits under Section 936/30A of the
Internal Revenue Code. The U.S. federal tax benefits
derived from our Puerto Rico operations expired on
December 31, 2005. We converted our Puerto Rico operations
to two wholly-owned, controlled foreign corporations and shifted
more production to low cost sources. We intend to permanently
reinvest the earnings from these operations outside the
U.S. As permitted in APB Opinion No. 23,
Accounting for Income Taxes, we do not provide
U.S. income taxes on a controlled foreign
corporations undistributed earnings that are intended to
be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Therefore, our
effective tax rate following expiration of these tax benefits
should reflect the permanent reinvestment of these foreign
earnings outside the U.S. See further information in
Note 13 Income Taxes in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net
Income and Earnings Per Share
Net income and diluted earnings per share in 2005 improved
versus 2004 as a result of higher net sales, lower special
charges and favorable other income/expense, partially offset by
higher S&A expenses and an increase in the effective tax
rate.
Segment
Results
Electrical
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
1,496.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,476.8
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
142.7
|
|
|
$
|
156.7
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
28
Electrical segment net sales increased 1% in 2005 versus 2004
primarily as a result of higher selling prices which were
partially offset by lower unit volumes. Higher selling prices
were implemented and had been realized in most of the businesses
within the segment in an effort to recover cost increases,
primarily related to higher raw material, energy and freight
costs.
Lighting fixture sales represented in excess of 50% of total net
sales reported in the Electrical segment in both 2005 and 2004.
Sales of lighting fixtures declined modestly as lower shipments
of commercial and industrial lighting fixtures were
substantially offset by higher residential fixture sales.
Residential products benefited from the continued favorable
market conditions due in part to historically low mortgage
interest rates and market share gains. The C&I lighting
businesses were negatively impacted by lower levels of
construction projects in the U.S. which had intensified
competitiveness and made price realization difficult.
Wiring system sales were level with sales reported in the
comparable prior year period as stronger industrial market
demand was offset by weak commercial markets. Wiring systems
sales are believed to be below the levels of improvement in the
underlying markets served by this business due in part to lower
order input levels and inefficiencies associated with the
closure of a factory, outsourcing and the SAP business system
implementation.
Rough-in electrical sales increased mainly as a result of higher
selling prices, partially offset by lower volume due to weak
commercial markets. Sales of harsh and hazardous products
increased
year-over-year
by double digits primarily due to higher oil and gas project
shipments related to strong market conditions worldwide.
Operating margin in the segment was lower in 2005 versus 2004
primarily due to unabsorbed costs in our manufacturing
facilities resulting from lower unit volumes, as well as higher
commodity raw material, freight and utility costs which were not
fully offset by selling price increases. As part of our lighting
integration and rationalization program, we were engaged in
plant relocations that had temporarily added costs and lowered
factory efficiencies. In addition, operating margins in our
wiring systems business were negatively affected
year-over-year
versus 2004 by higher costs and training and processing
inefficiencies associated with the implementation of the SAP
business system as well as a factory closure. Wiring systems
also incurred higher than normal costs associated with new
product programs. Harsh and hazardous margins were higher
year-over-year,
consistent with increases in sales, due to higher order input
levels and a better mix of sales. Overall, the segment incurred
higher S&A expenses
year-over-year
due to new product initiatives, office consolidations and higher
SAP amortization charges, partially offset by a
$4.9 million pretax gain on sale of a building. Special
charges in 2005 were lower by $5.8 million compared with
2004. See discussions above under Special Charges.
Power
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
455.6
|
|
|
$
|
386.2
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
69.0
|
|
|
$
|
41.2
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
Power segment net sales increased 18% in 2005 versus the prior
year due to the carryover effect of price increases, the
addition of two acquisitions and higher storm-related shipments.
Price increases were implemented across most product lines
throughout 2004 and into 2005 where costs had risen due to
increased metal and energy costs. We estimate that price
increases accounted for approximately one-third of the
year-over-year
sales increase. Two acquisitions accounted for approximately
5 percentage points of the
year-over-year
increase and incremental storm-related shipments comprised
another 3 percentage points of the improvement.
Operating margins improved in 2005 versus 2004 as a result of
the increase in volume, an improved mix of higher margin
products, productivity improvements including strategic sourcing
and lean programs and selling price increases realized above the
comparable level of cost increases.
29
Industrial
Technology Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
152.5
|
|
|
$
|
130.0
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
Industrial Technology segment net sales increased 17% in 2005
versus 2004 as many of the businesses within this segment
benefited from strong oil and gas markets and improvement in
industrial market activity as evidenced by rising capacity
utilization rates. This segments technology-oriented high
voltage test equipment increased
year-over-year
sales by double-digits. In addition, we acquired two businesses
which accounted for approximately 5 percentage points of
the segment sales increase. Operating income and margins for the
full year 2005 improved versus 2004 primarily as a result of
increased volume, productivity improvements and a more favorable
product mix. Acquisitions had only a modest impact on the
year-over-year
profitability improvement in the segment as a result of costs
incurred to integrate the acquired operations into existing
segment facilities.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
139.9
|
|
|
$
|
184.1
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(139.6
|
)
|
|
|
(182.1
|
)
|
Foreign exchange effect on cash
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
(65.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities in 2006 of
$139.9 million was $44.2 million or 24% lower than
cash provided by operating activities in 2005 primarily as a
result of higher levels of inventory and accounts receivable.
Cash used to fund an increase in inventory was
$86.3 million in 2006 compared with $13.2 million in
2005. Accounts receivable balances increased by
$30.7 million in 2006 compared to an increase of
$16.9 million in 2005. Partially offsetting these increases
were the lack of a contribution to our domestic, qualified,
defined benefit pension plans in 2006 compared to a
$28 million payment in 2005, and higher current liability
balances resulting in a source of cash of approximately
$13.3 million in 2006 compared to $2 million in 2005.
Inventory balances increased in 2006 primarily due to a
combination of business inefficiencies associated with the
system implementation and new product launches. Higher accounts
receivable are due to a higher level of sales in the fourth
quarter of 2006 compared with the same period of 2005. Current
liability balances in 2006 were higher than in 2005 primarily as
a result of higher customer incentives and employee related
compensation. Included within cash provided by operating
activities are income tax benefits from employee exercises of
stock options of $7.8 million in 2005.
Cash flows from investing activities include capital
expenditures of $86.8 million in 2006 compared to
$73.4 million in 2005. The $13.4 million increase is
attributed to higher expenditures primarily in connection with
construction of the new lighting headquarters for which
expenditures increased $14.2 million
year-over-year.
In addition, incremental investments in equipment were partially
offset by $7.6 million of lower capital expenditures for
software, principally related to the system implementation. Cash
outlays to acquire new businesses totaled $145.7 million in
2006 compared to $54.3 million in 2005. Purchases and
maturities/sales of investments provided net cash proceeds of
$163.8 million in 2006 compared to net cash proceeds of
$81.1 million in 2005. Proceeds from disposition of assets
decreased to $0.6 million in 2006 compared to
$14.6 million in 2005 with the prior year amount reflecting
proceeds from a building sale in the Electrical segment.
30
Financing cash flows used $139.6 million of cash in 2006
compared to $182.1 million in 2005. Cash used in 2005
reflects the repayment of $100.0 million of senior notes at
maturity. Net repayments of short-term debt were
$8.9 million in 2006 compared to net borrowings of
$28.4 million in 2005. The prior year included borrowing
related to international acquisitions and dividend
repatriations. Purchases of common shares increased in 2006 to
$95.1 million compared to $62.7 million in 2005.
Proceeds from stock options were $38.5 million in 2006
compared to $32.8 million in 2005.
Investments
in the Business
We define investments in our business to include both normal
expenditures required to maintain the operations of our
equipment and facilities as well as expenditures in support of
our strategic initiatives.
Capital expenditures were $93.7 million, including
non-expended cash of $6.9 million at December 31,
2006. Additions to property, plant, and equipment were
$79.6 million in 2006 compared to $51.7 million in
2005 as a result of increased investments made in buildings and
equipment. We capitalized $26 million and $6 million
in 2006 and 2005, respectively, in connection with the new
lighting headquarters. In 2006 and 2005, we capitalized $14.1
and $20.5 million of software, respectively, primarily in
connection with our business information system initiative
(recorded in Intangible assets and other in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet).
In 2006, we spent a total of $145.7 million on new
acquisitions, net of cash acquired, including $0.2 million
from a prior year acquisition. These 2006 acquisitions are
expected to provide approximately $106 million of annual
net sales of which approximately 24% will be added to our
Industrial Technology and 76% will be added to our Power
segment. These acquisitions are part of our core markets growth
strategy. In 2005, we completed five small but strategic
business acquisitions, two in our Power segment, two in our
Industrial Technology segment and one in our Electrical segment.
In 2006, we spent a total of $95.1 million on the
repurchase of common shares compared to $62.7 million spent
in 2005. These repurchases were executed under Board of Director
approved stock repurchase programs which authorized the
repurchase of our Class A and Class B Common Stock up
to certain dollar amounts. In February 2006, the Board of
Directors approved stock repurchase program and authorized the
repurchase of up to $100 million of the Companys
Class A and Class B Common Stock which expires after
three years. As of December 31, 2006, this program had
approximately $50.7 million remaining to be purchased. In
February 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new stock
repurchase program and authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of Class A and Class B Common Stock
to be completed over the next two years. This program will be
implemented upon completion of the February 2006 program. Stock
repurchases are being implemented through open market and
privately negotiated transactions. The timing of such
transactions depends on a variety of factors, including market
conditions. Additional information with respect to share
repurchases is included in Part II, Item 5 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Additional information with respect to future investments in the
business can be found under Outlook within
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Capital
Structure
Debt
to Capital
Net debt as disclosed below is a non-GAAP measure that may not
be comparable to definitions used by other companies. We
consider Net debt to be more appropriate than Total Debt for
measuring our financial leverage as it better measures our
ability to meet our funding needs.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
|
$
|
228.8
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
1,015.5
|
|
|
|
998.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,235.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,226.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to Total Capital
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Investments
|
|
$
|
81.5
|
|
|
$
|
310.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt (Total debt less cash and
investments)
|
|
$
|
138.7
|
|
|
$
|
(81.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt defined as total debt less cash and investments
increased as a result of lower cash and investments in 2006
compared to 2005 due principally to financing required for
acquisitions and share repurchases.
Debt
Structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
199.3
|
|
|
|
199.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
|
$
|
228.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, Short-term debt in our Consolidated
Balance Sheet consisted of $15.8 million of commercial
paper and $5.1 million of a money market loan. Commercial
paper is used to help fund working capital needs, in particular
inventory purchases. The money market loan represents a line of
credit to borrow up to 5.0 million pounds sterling
(U.S. $ equivalent of $9.8 million at December 31,
2006). This loan which expires on July 8, 2007 provides for
an interest rate of one-half of one percentage point above the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). At
December 31, 2005, Short-term debt consisted of a
$7.5 million money market loan, $22.0 million of
borrowings against our credit facility and $0.1 million of
other borrowings. The money market loan represented a line of
credit to borrow up to 5.0 million pounds sterling
(U.S. $ equivalent at December 31, 2005 was
$8.8 million). Borrowings of $22.0 million were drawn
against our $200 million credit facility and used along
with available cash to repatriate foreign earnings from one of
our foreign subsidiaries under the provisions of the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Long-term debt in our
Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of $200 million,
excluding unamortized discount, of senior notes with a maturity
date of 2012. These notes are fixed rate indebtedness, are not
callable and are only subject to accelerated payment prior to
maturity if we fail to meet certain non-financial covenants, all
of which were met at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The most
restrictive of these covenants limits our ability to enter into
mortgages and sale-leasebacks of property having a net book
value in excess of $5 million without the approval of the
Note holders. In 2002, prior to the issuance of the
$200 million notes, we entered into a forward interest rate
lock to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in treasury interest
rates, which resulted in a loss of $1.3 million in 2002.
This amount was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) and is being amortized over the life of the notes.
At December 31, 2006, we had $200 million of available
borrowings under our $200 million committed bank credit
facility. This credit facility serves as a back up to our
commercial paper program and will expire in October 2009.
Borrowings under this credit agreement generally are available
with an interest rate equal to the prime rate or at a spread
over LIBOR. Annual commitment fee requirements to support
availability of the credit facility total approximately
$0.2 million.
Although not the principal source of our liquidity, we believe
these facilities are capable of providing adequate financing at
reasonable rates of interest. However, a significant
deterioration in results of operations or cash flows,
32
leading to deterioration in financial condition, could either
increase our future borrowing costs or restrict our ability to
sell commercial paper in the open market. We have not entered
into any other guarantees, commitments or obligations that could
give rise to unexpected cash requirements.
Liquidity
We measure our liquidity on the basis of our ability to meet
short-term and long-term operational funding needs, fund
additional investments, including acquisitions, and make
dividend payments to shareholders. Significant factors affecting
the management of liquidity are the level of cash flows from
operating activities, capital expenditures, access to bank lines
of credit and our ability to attract long-term capital with
satisfactory terms.
Normal internal cash generation from operations together with
currently available cash and investments, available borrowing
facilities, and an ability to access credit lines, if needed,
are expected to be more than sufficient to fund operations, the
current rate of dividends, capital expenditures, stock
repurchases and any increase in working capital that would be
required to accommodate a higher level of business activity. We
actively seek to expand by acquisition as well as through the
growth of our present businesses. While a significant
acquisition may require additional borrowings, we believe we
would be able to obtain financing based on our favorable
historical earnings performance and strong financial position.
Pension
Funding Status
We have a number of funded and unfunded non-contributory U.S.
and foreign defined benefit pension plans. Benefits under these
plans are generally provided based on either years of service
and final average pay or a specified dollar amount per year of
service. The funded status of our qualified, defined benefit
pension plans is dependant upon many factors including future
returns on invested pension assets, the level of market interest
rates, employee earnings and employee demographics.
Effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 158 which required the Company
to recognize the funded status of its defined benefit pension
and postretirement plans as an asset or liability in its
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Gains or losses, prior service costs
or credits, and transition assets or obligations that have not
yet been included in net periodic benefit cost as of the end of
the year of adoption are recognized as components of the ending
balance of Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax,
within Shareholders equity. As a result of the adoption of
SFAS 158, the Company recorded a charge to equity through
Accumulated other comprehensive income related to pensions of
$36.1 million of a total charge to equity of
$36.8 million including amounts for other postretirement
benefits. Further details on the pretax impact of this charge
can be found in Note 11 Retirement Benefits.
Changes in the value of the defined benefit plan assets and
liabilities will affect the amount of pension expense ultimately
recognized. Although differences between actuarial assumptions
and actual results are no longer deferred for balance sheet
purposes, deferral is still required for pension expense
purposes. Unrecognized gains and losses in excess of an annual
calculated minimum amount (the greater of 10% of the projected
benefit obligation or 10% of the market value of assets) are
amortized and recognized in net periodic pension cost over our
average remaining service period of active employees, which
approximates
13-15 years.
During 2006, we recorded $3.8 million of pension expense
related to the amortization of these unrecognized losses. We
expect to record $2.1 million of expense related to
unrecognized losses in 2007.
The actual return on our pension assets in the current year as
well as the cumulative return over the past five and ten year
periods has exceeded our expected return for the same periods.
Offsetting these favorable returns has been a decline in
long-term interest rates and a resulting increase in our pension
liabilities. These declines in long-term interest rates have had
a negative impact on the funded status of the plans.
Consequently, we contributed $25 million in 2004 and
$28 million in 2005 to our domestic, defined benefit
pension plans. No contribution was made to our domestic, defined
benefit pension plans during 2006. In addition to these
contributions to our U.S. plans, additional contributions
have also been made to our foreign defined benefit plans of
approximately $6.0 million, $3.5 million and
$7.7 million for the years 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. These contributions along with favorable
investment performance of the plan assets have improved the
funded status of all of our plans. In the first quarter of 2007,
we made a $15 million contribution to our domestic,
qualified, defined benefit plans and we do not expect to
33
contribute any additional amounts to our domestic qualified
plans for the balance of 2007. We expect to make additional
contributions of between $5-$7 million to our foreign plans
later this year. This level of funding is not expected to have
any significant impact on our overall liquidity.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were used to determine projected
pension and other benefit obligations at the measurement date
and the net periodic benefit costs for the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions
used to determine benefit obligations at
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions
used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
At the end of each year, we estimate the expected long-term rate
of return on pension plan assets based on the strategic asset
allocation for our plans. In making this determination, we
utilize expected rates of return for each asset class based upon
current market conditions and expected risk premiums for each
asset class. A one percentage point change in the expected
long-term rate of return on pension fund assets would have an
impact of approximately $5.3 million on 2007 pretax pension
expense. The expected long-term rate of return is applied to the
fair market value of pension fund assets to produce the expected
return on fund assets that is included in pension expense. The
difference between this expected return and the actual return on
plan assets was recognized at December 31, 2006 for balance
sheet purposes, but continues to be deferred for expense
purposes. The net deferral of past asset gains (losses)
ultimately affects future pension expense through the
amortization of gains (losses) with an offsetting adjustment to
Shareholders equity through Accumulated other
comprehensive income.
At the end of each year, we determine the discount rate to be
used to calculate the present value of pension plan liabilities.
The discount rate is an estimate of the current interest rate at
which the pension plans liabilities could effectively be
settled. In estimating this rate, we look to rates of return on
high-quality, fixed-income investments with maturities that
closely match the expected funding period of our pension
liability. The discount rate of 5.75% which we used to determine
the projected benefit obligation for our U.S. pension plans
at December 31, 2006 was determined using the Citigroup
Pension Discount Curve applied to our expected annual future
pension benefit payments. An increase of one percentage point in
the discount rate would lower 2007 pretax pension expense by
approximately $2.0 million. A discount rate decline of one
percentage point would increase pretax pension expense by
approximately $5.8 million.
Our Shareholders equity is impacted by a variety of
factors, including those items that are not reported in earnings
but are reported directly in equity. In 2003 and 2004, we
recorded increases to Shareholders equity of
$8.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively,
reflecting a reduction of the pension plan additional minimum
liability. In 2005, we increased the additional minimum
liability by $2.2 million. In 2006, prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 158, we recorded a reduction of
$2.1 million, net of tax, of the additional minimum
liability. Effective with the adoption of SFAS No. 158 at
December 31, 2006, the balance in the additional minimum
liability account was reversed and an incremental charge related
to pensions of $36.1 million, net of tax, was recorded.
Other
Post Employment Benefits (OPEB)
We had health care and life insurance benefit plans covering
eligible employees who reached retirement age while working for
the Company. These benefits were discontinued in 1991 for
substantially all future retirees with the exception of certain
operations in our Power segment which still maintain a limited
retiree medical plan for their
34
union employees. These plans are not funded and, therefore, no
assumed rate of return on assets is required. The discount rate
of 5.75% used to determine the projected benefit obligation at
December 31, 2006 was based upon the Citigroup Pension
Discount Curve as applied to our projected annual benefit
payments for these plans. The impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 158 on OPEB was a net charge to Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax, of $0.7 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Off-balance sheet arrangements are defined as any transaction,
agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity
that is not included in our consolidated results is a party,
under which we, whether or not a party to the arrangement, have,
or in the future may have: (1) an obligation under a direct
or indirect guarantee or similar arrangement, (2) a
retained or contingent interest in assets or (3) an
obligation or liability, including a contingent obligation or
liability, to the extent that it is not fully reflected in the
financial statements.
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined
above which have or are likely to have a material effect on
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Contractual
Obligations
A summary of our contractual obligations and commitments at
December 31, 2006 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
$
|
220.9
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected interest payments
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
208.7
|
|
|
|
197.2
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payments
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under customer
incentive programs
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
571.8
|
|
|
$
|
269.9
|
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
|
$
|
35.5
|
|
|
$
|
220.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our purchase obligations include amounts committed under legally
enforceable contracts or purchase orders for goods and services
with defined terms as to price, quantity, delivery and
termination liability. These obligations primarily consist of
inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to
meet operational requirements, contracts for the construction of
the lighting headquarters, consulting arrangements and
commitments for equipment purchases. Other long-term liabilities
reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,
2006 have been excluded from the table above and primarily
consist of costs associated with retirement benefits. See
Note 11 Retirement Benefits in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for estimates of future
benefit payments under our benefit plans.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
describes the significant accounting policies used in the
preparation of our financial statements.
Use of
Estimates
We are required to make assumptions and estimates and apply
judgments in the preparation of our financial statements that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses and related disclosures. We base our assumptions,
estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends
and other factors deemed relevant by management. We continually
review these estimates and their underlying assumptions to
ensure they are appropriate for the circumstances. Changes in
estimates and assumptions used by us could have a
35
significant impact on our financial results. We believe that the
following estimates are among our most critical in fully
understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.
These items utilize assumptions and estimates about the effect
of future events that are inherently uncertain and are therefore
based on our judgment.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements and the SEC revisions in SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104. Revenue is recognized
when title to goods and risk of loss have passed to the
customer, there is persuasive evidence of a purchase
arrangement, delivery has occurred or services are rendered, the
price is determinable and collectibility reasonably assured.
Revenue is typically recognized at the time of shipment.
Further, certain of our businesses account for sales discounts
and allowances based on sales volumes, specific programs and
customer deductions, as is customary in electrical products
markets. These items primarily relate to sales volume
incentives, special pricing allowances, and returned goods. This
requires us to estimate at the time of sale the amounts that
should not be recorded as revenue as these amounts are not
expected to be collected in cash from customers. We principally
rely on historical experience, specific customer agreements, and
anticipated future trends to estimate these amounts at the time
of shipment. Also see Note 1 Significant
Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Inventory
Valuation
We routinely evaluate the carrying value of our inventories to
ensure they are carried at the lower of cost or market value.
Such evaluation is based on our judgment and use of estimates,
including sales forecasts, gross margins for particular product
groupings, planned dispositions of product lines, technological
events and trends and overall industry trends. In addition, the
evaluation is based on changes in inventory management practices
which may influence the timing of exiting products and method of
disposing of excess inventory.
Excess inventory is generally identified by comparing future
expected inventory usage to actual on-hand quantities. Reserves
are provided for on-hand inventory in excess of pre-defined
usage forecasts. Forecast usage is primarily determined by
projecting historical (actual) sales and inventory usage levels
forward to future periods. Application of this reserve
methodology can have the effect of increasing reserves during
periods of declining demand and, conversely, reducing reserve
requirements during periods of accelerating demand. This reserve
methodology is applied based upon a current stratification of
inventory, whether by commodity type, product family, part
number, stock keeping unit, etc. As a result of our lean process
improvement initiatives, we continue to develop improved
information concerning demand patterns for inventory
consumption. This improved information is introduced into the
excess inventory reserve calculation as it becomes available and
may impact required levels of reserves.
Customer
Credit and Collections
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts receivable in order
to reflect the potential uncollectibility of receivables related
to purchases of products on open credit. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
their inability to make required payments, we may be required to
record additional allowances for doubtful accounts.
Capitalized
Computer Software Costs
We capitalize certain costs of internally developed software in
accordance with Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalized costs include
purchased materials and services and payroll and payroll related
costs. General and administrative, overhead, maintenance and
training costs, as well as the cost of software that does not
add functionality to the existing system, are expensed as
incurred. The cost of internally developed software is amortized
on a straight-line basis over appropriate periods, generally
five years. The unamortized balance of internally developed
software is included in Intangible assets and other in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
36
Employee
Benefits Costs and Funding
We sponsor domestic and foreign defined benefit pension, defined
contribution and other postretirement plans. Major assumptions
used in the accounting for these employee benefit plans include
the discount rate, expected return on the pension fund assets,
rate of increase in employee compensation levels and health care
cost increase projections. These assumptions are determined
based on Company data and appropriate market indicators, and are
evaluated each year as of the plans measurement date.
Further discussion on the assumptions used in 2005 and 2006 are
included above under Pension Funding Status and in
Note 11 Retirement Benefits in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be
recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary
differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets
and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that
deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax asset will not be realized. The factors used to assess the
likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets are the
forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning
strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred
tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income can
affect the ultimate realization of net deferred tax assets.
In addition, we operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and
are subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The IRS and other
tax authorities routinely review our tax returns. These audits
can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period
of time to resolve. The impact of these examinations on our
liability for income taxes cannot be presently determined. In
managements opinion, adequate provision has been made for
potential adjustments arising from these examinations.
Contingent
Liabilities
We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits, and other claims or
uncertainties related to environmental, legal, product and other
matters. We routinely assess the likelihood of an adverse
judgment or outcome to these matters, as well as the range of
potential losses. A determination of the reserves required, if
any, is made after careful analysis, including consultations
with outside advisors, where applicable. The required reserves
may change in the future due to new developments.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets
Our long-lived assets include land, buildings, equipment, molds
and dies, software, goodwill and other intangible assets.
Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangibles, are depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
We review depreciable long-lived assets for impairment to assess
recoverability from future operations using undiscounted cash
flows. For these assets, no impairment charges were recorded in
2006 or 2005, except for certain assets affected by the lighting
integration program as discussed under Special
Charges within this Managements Discussion and
Analysis and in Note 2 Special Charges of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed
annually for impairment unless circumstances dictate the need
for more frequent assessment under the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The identification and measurement of impairment
of goodwill involves the estimation of the fair value of
reporting units. The estimates of fair value of reporting units
are based on the best information available as of the date of
the assessment, which primarily incorporate our assumptions
about discounted expected future cash flows. Future cash flows
can be affected by changes in industry or market conditions or
the rate and extent to which anticipated synergies or cost
savings are realized from newly acquired entities. The
identification and measurement of impairment of indefinite-lived
intangible assets involves testing which compares carrying
values of assets to the estimated fair values of assets. When
appropriate, the carrying value of assets will be reduced to
estimated fair values.
37
Forward-Looking
Statements
Some of the information included in this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K
and in the Annual Report attached hereto, which does not
constitute part of this
Form 10-K,
contain forward-looking statements as defined by the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include
statements about capital resources, performance and results of
operations and are based on our reasonable current expectations.
In addition, all statements regarding anticipated growth or
improvement in operating results, anticipated market conditions,
and economic recovery are forward looking. Forward-looking
statements may be identified by the use of words, such as
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, depend, should,
plan, estimated, could,
may, subject to, continues,
growing, prospective,
forecast, projected,
purport, might, if,
contemplate, potential,
pending, target, goals,
scheduled, will likely be, and similar
words and phrases. Discussions of strategies, plans or
intentions often contain forward-looking statements. Factors,
among others, that could cause our actual results and future
actions to differ materially from those described in
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in demand for our products, market conditions, or
product availability adversely affecting sales levels.
|
|
|
|
Changes in markets or competition adversely affecting
realization of price increases.
|
|
|
|
The amounts of net cash expenditures, benefits, including
available state and local tax incentives, the timing of actions
and impact of personnel reductions in connection with the
ongoing lighting business integration and rationalization
program and other special charges.
|
|
|
|
Failure to achieve projected levels of efficiencies, cost
savings and cost reduction measures, including those expected as
a result of our lean initiative and strategic sourcing plans.
|
|
|
|
The amounts of cash expenditures, benefits and the timing of
actions in connection with our enterprise-wide business system
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability and costs of raw materials, purchased components,
energy and freight.
|
|
|
|
Changes in expected levels of operating cash flow and uses of
cash.
|
|
|
|
General economic and business conditions in particular
industries or markets.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory issues, changes in tax laws or changes in geographic
profit mix affecting tax rates and availability of tax
incentives.
|
|
|
|
Failure to achieve expected benefits of process improvements and
other lean initiatives as a result of changes in strategy or
level of investments made.
|
|
|
|
A major disruption in one of our manufacturing or distribution
facilities or headquarters, including the impact of plant
consolidations, relocations and the construction of a new
lighting headquarters.
|
|
|
|
Impact of productivity improvements on lead times, quality and
delivery of product.
|
|
|
|
Future levels of indebtedness and capital spending.
|
|
|
|
Anticipated future contributions and assumptions including
changes in interest rates and plan assets with respect to
pensions.
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to product warranty accruals in response to claims
incurred, historical experiences and known costs.
|
|
|
|
Unexpected costs or charges, certain of which might be outside
of our control.
|
|
|
|
Changes in strategy, economic conditions or other conditions
outside of our control affecting anticipated future global
product sourcing levels.
|
|
|
|
Intense or new competition in the markets in which we compete.
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to carry out future acquisitions and strategic
investments in our core businesses and costs relating to
acquisitions and acquisition integration costs.
|
|
|
|
Future repurchases of common stock under our common stock
repurchase programs.
|
|
|
|
Changes in customers credit worthiness adversely affecting
the ability to continue business relationships with major
customers.
|
|
|
|
The outcome of environmental, legal and tax contingencies or
costs compared to amounts provided for such contingencies.
|
|
|
|
Changes in accounting principles, interpretations, or estimates,
including the impact of adopting FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109.
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the
potential use of hedging instruments to hedge the exposure to
fluctuating rates of foreign currency exchange on inventory
purchases.
|
|
|
|
Other factors described in our SEC filings, including the
Business and Risk Factors Section in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|
Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and actual results, developments and business
decisions may differ from those contemplated by such
forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any duty to
update any forward-looking statement, all of which are expressly
qualified by the foregoing, other than as required by law.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
In the operation of our business, we have various exposures to
areas of risk related to factors within and outside the control
of management. Significant areas of risk and our strategies to
manage the exposure are discussed below.
We manufacture our products in the United States, Canada,
Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy, United Kingdom, Brazil
and Australia and sell products in those markets as well as
through sales offices in Singapore, the Peoples Republic
of China, Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea and the Middle East.
International shipments from
non-U.S. subsidiaries
as a percentage of the Companys total net sales were 13%
in 2006, 11% in 2005 and 10% in 2004. The Canadian market
represents 38%, United Kingdom 32%, Switzerland 11%, Mexico 8%,
and all other areas 11% of total 2006 international sales. As
such, our operating results could be affected by changes in
foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in
the foreign markets in which we sell our products. To manage
this exposure, we closely monitor the working capital
requirements of our international units. In 2006, we entered
into a series of forward exchange contracts on behalf of our
Canadian operation to purchase U.S. dollars in order to
hedge part of their exposure to fluctuating rates of exchange on
anticipated inventory purchases. As of December 31, 2006 we
had three outstanding contracts for $1.0 million each,
which expire ratably through March 2007.
Product purchases representing approximately 14% of our net
sales are sourced from unaffiliated suppliers located outside
the United States, primarily in China and other Asian countries,
Europe and Mexico. We are actively seeking to expand this
activity, particularly related to purchases from low cost areas
of the world. Foreign sourcing of products may result in
unexpected fluctuations in product cost or increased risk of
business interruption due to lack of product or component
availability due to any one of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Political or economic uncertainty in the source country.
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the
U.S. dollar and the currencies of the source countries.
|
|
|
|
Increased logistical complexity including supply chain
interruption or delay, port of departure or entry disruption and
overall time to market.
|
|
|
|
Loss of proprietary information.
|
39
We have developed plans that address many of these risks. Such
actions include careful selection of products to be outsourced
and the suppliers selected; ensuring multiple sources of supply;
limiting concentrations of activity by port, broker, freight
forwarder, etc, and; maintaining control over operations,
technologies and manufacturing deemed to provide competitive
advantage.
Many of our businesses have a dependency on certain basic raw
materials needed to produce their products including steel,
brass, copper, aluminum, bronze, plastics, phenols, zinc,
nickel, elastomers and petrochemicals as well as purchased
electrical and electronic components. Our financial results
could be affected by the availability and changes in prices of
these materials and components. Certain of these materials are
sourced from a limited number of suppliers. These materials are
also key source materials for many other companies in our
industry and within the universe of industrial manufacturers in
general. As such, in periods of rising demand for these
materials, we may experience both (1) increased costs and
(2) limited supply. These conditions can potentially result
in our inability to acquire these key materials on a timely
basis to produce our products and satisfy our incoming sales
orders. Similarly, the cost of these materials can rise suddenly
and result in materially higher costs of producing our products.
We believe we have adequate primary and secondary sources of
supply for each of our key materials and that, in periods of
rising prices, we expect to recover a majority of the increased
cost in the form of higher selling prices. However, recoveries
typically lag the effect of cost increases due to the nature of
our markets.
Our financial results are subject to interest rate fluctuations
to the extent there is a difference between the amount of our
interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing
liabilities. The principal objective of our investment
management activities is to maximize net investment income while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity
risk and facilitating our funding needs. As part of our
investment management strategy, we may use derivative financial
products such as interest rate hedges and interest rate swaps.
Refer to further discussion under Capital Structure
within this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
From time to time or when required, we issue commercial paper,
which exposes us to changes in interest rates. Our cash position
includes amounts denominated in foreign currencies. We manage
our worldwide cash requirements by considering available funds
held by our subsidiaries and the cost effectiveness with which
these funds can be accessed.
We continually evaluate risk retention and insurance levels for
product liability, property damage and other potential exposures
to risk. We devote significant effort to maintaining and
improving safety and internal control programs, which are
intended to reduce our exposure to certain risks. We determine
the level of insurance coverage and the likelihood of a loss and
believe that the current levels of risk retention are consistent
with those of comparable companies in the industries in which we
operate. There can be no assurance that we will not incur losses
beyond the limits of our insurance. However, our liquidity,
financial position and profitability are not expected to be
materially affected by the levels of risk retention that we
accept.
The following table presents cost information related to
interest risk sensitive instruments by maturity at
December 31, 2006 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
investments
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Avg. interest rate
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
|
$
|
209.7
|
|
Avg. interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the assets and liabilities above are fixed rate
instruments. Other
available-for-sale
securities with a carrying value of $35.9 million are
adjustable rate instruments which are not interest risk
sensitive and are not included in the table above. All
short-term debt is considered variable rate debt and therefore
is not interest risk sensitive. We use derivative financial
instruments only if they are matched with a specific asset,
liability, or proposed future transaction. We do not speculate
or use leverage when trading a financial derivative product.
40
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form 10-K
for
|
|
|
2006, Page:
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Financial Statement
Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is shown in the consolidated
financial statements or notes thereto.
41
REPORT OF
MANAGEMENT
HUBBELL INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Report on
Managements Responsibility for Financial
Statements
Our management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and
fair presentation of its published financial statements. The
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and include amounts based on informed judgments made by
management.
We believe it is critical to provide investors and other users
of our financial statements with information that is relevant,
objective, understandable and timely, so that they can make
informed decisions. As a result, we have established and we
maintain systems and practices and internal control processes
designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance that
transactions are properly executed and recorded and that our
policies and procedures are carried out appropriately.
Management strives to recruit, train and retain high quality
people to ensure that controls are designed, implemented and
maintained in a high-quality, reliable manner.
Our independent registered public accounting firm audited our
financial statements and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
in accordance with Standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Their report appears
on the next two pages within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our Board of Directors normally meets five times per year to
provide oversight, to review corporate strategies and
operations, and to assess managements conduct of the
business. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (which
meets approximately eleven times per year) is comprised of at
least three individuals all of whom must be
independent under current New York Stock Exchange
listing standards and regulations adopted by the SEC under the
federal securities laws. The Audit Committee meets regularly
with our internal auditors and independent registered public
accounting firm, as well as management to review, among other
matters, accounting, auditing, internal controls and financial
reporting issues and practices. Both the internal auditors and
independent registered public accounting firm have full,
unlimited access to the Audit Committee.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate systems of internal control over financial reporting as
defined by
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Management has assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm as stated in their report which is included on
the next two pages within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy H. Powers
|
|
David G. Nord
|
Chairman of the Board,
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
President & Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
42
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Hubbell
Incorporated:
We have completed integrated audits of Hubbell
Incorporateds consolidated financial statements and of its
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our
opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Hubbell Incorporated and its
subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with
the related consolidated financial statements. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for share-based compensation in 2006, and the manner in which it
accounts for defined benefit pension and other postretirement
plans effective December 31, 2006.
Internal
control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 8, that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects,
based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Companys
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express opinions on managements
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We
conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable
43
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Stamford, Connecticut
February 23, 2007
44
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,414.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.0
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,757.5
|
|
|
|
1,509.9
|
|
|
|
1,431.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
656.8
|
|
|
|
595.0
|
|
|
|
561.9
|
|
Selling & administrative
expenses
|
|
|
415.6
|
|
|
|
357.9
|
|
|
|
333.9
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
233.9
|
|
|
|
226.8
|
|
|
|
212.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income
taxes
|
|
|
221.5
|
|
|
|
215.7
|
|
|
|
197.3
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.62
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45.3
|
|
|
$
|
110.6
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
121.3
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
354.3
|
|
|
|
310.4
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
338.2
|
|
|
|
237.1
|
|
Deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
814.4
|
|
|
|
820.1
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment,
net
|
|
|
318.5
|
|
|
|
267.8
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
436.7
|
|
|
|
351.5
|
|
Intangible assets and other
|
|
|
181.6
|
|
|
|
148.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,751.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and
employee benefits
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
109.9
|
|
|
|
89.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
382.3
|
|
|
|
360.5
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
199.3
|
|
|
|
199.2
|
|
Other Non-Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
154.4
|
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
736.0
|
|
|
|
668.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
authorized 50,000,000 shares, outstanding 8,177,234 and
9,127,960 shares
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Class B
authorized 150,000,000 shares, outstanding 52,001,000 and
51,962,990 shares
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
219.9
|
|
|
|
267.2
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
827.4
|
|
|
|
749.1
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(32.4
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
1,015.5
|
|
|
|
998.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,751.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (Gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
Non-cash special charges
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(30.7
|
)
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
(61.5
|
)
|
Increase in inventories
|
|
|
(86.3
|
)
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
Increase in current liabilities
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Changes in other assets and
liabilities, net
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to domestic,
qualified, defined benefit pension plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
184.1
|
|
|
|
184.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(145.7
|
)
|
|
|
(54.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of assets
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(86.8
|
)
|
|
|
(73.4
|
)
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
(153.2
|
)
|
|
|
(293.0
|
)
|
|
|
(415.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
296.0
|
|
|
|
356.9
|
|
|
|
329.0
|
|
Purchases of
held-to-maturity
investments
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities/sales of
held-to-maturity
investments
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
(108.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper borrowings, net
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of other debt
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of other debt
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(80.1
|
)
|
|
|
(80.6
|
)
|
|
|
(79.9
|
)
|
Acquisition of common shares
|
|
|
(95.1
|
)
|
|
|
(62.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(139.6
|
)
|
|
|
(182.1
|
)
|
|
|
(55.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(65.3
|
)
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
110.6
|
|
|
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
45.3
|
|
|
$
|
110.6
|
|
|
$
|
139.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 (in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2003
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
|
$
|
590.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
829.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.7
|
|
Minimum pension liability
adjustment, net of related tax effect of $1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge,
net of $0.1 of amortization, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.9
|
|
Exercise of stock options,
including tax benefit of $6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
Acquisition of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
($1.32 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
280.7
|
|
|
$
|
664.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
944.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165.1
|
|
Minimum pension liability
adjustment, net of related tax effect of $1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge
including $0.1 of amortization, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Issuance of common shares under
compensation arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Exercise of stock options,
including tax benefit of $7.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
Acquisition of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.7
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
($1.32 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
267.2
|
|
|
$
|
749.1
|
|
|
$
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
998.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158.1
|
|
Minimum pension liability
adjustment, net of related tax effect of $1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on
investments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge
including $0.1 of amortization, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173.3
|
|
Benefit plan adjustment to
initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of tax of $19.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
|
|
(36.8
|
)
|
Reversal of unearned compensation
upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
Tax benefits from stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Acquisition/surrender of common
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95.7
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared
($1.32 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
219.9
|
|
|
$
|
827.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,015.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
48
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1
Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include all subsidiaries;
all significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated. The Company has one active joint venture which is
accounted for using the equity method. Certain reclassifications
have been made in prior year financial statements and notes to
conform to the current year presentation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. Actual results could differ from the estimates that
are used.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized when title to the goods sold and the risk
of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive
evidence of a purchase arrangement, delivery has occurred or
services are rendered, the price is determinable and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is typically
recognized at the time of shipment as the Companys
shipping terms are generally FOB shipping point. The Company
recognizes less than one-percent of total annual consolidated
net revenue from post shipment obligations and service
contracts, primarily within the Industrial Technology segment.
Revenue is recognized under these contracts when the service is
completed and all conditions of sale have been met.
Further, certain of our businesses account for sales discounts
and allowances based on sales volumes, specific programs and
customer deductions, as is customary in electrical products
markets. These items primarily relate to sales volume
incentives, special pricing allowances, and returned goods.
Quantity rebates consist of volume incentive discount plans
which include specific sales volume targets for specific
customers. Certain distributors qualify for price rebates by
subsequently reselling the Companys products into select
channels of end users. Following a distributors sale of an
eligible product, the distributor submits a claim for a price
rebate. A number of distributors, primarily in the Electrical
segment, have a right to return goods under certain
circumstances which are reasonably estimable by affected
businesses and have historically ranged from 1%-3% of gross
sales. This requires us to estimate at the time of sale the
amounts that should not be recorded as revenue as these amounts
are not expected to be collected in cash from customers. The
Company principally relies on historical experience, specific
customer agreements and anticipated future trends to estimate
these amounts at the time of shipment.
Shipping
and Handling Fees and Costs
The Company records shipping and handling costs as part of Cost
of goods sold in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Any
amounts billed to customers for reimbursement of shipping and
handling are included in Net sales in the Consolidated Statement
of Income.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The assets and liabilities of international subsidiaries are
translated to U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at
the end of the year, and income and expense items are translated
at average exchange rates in effect during the year. The effects
of exchange rate fluctuations on the translated amounts of
foreign currency assets and liabilities are included as
translation adjustments in Accumulated other comprehensive
income within Shareholders equity. Gains and losses from
foreign currency transactions are included in income of the
period.
49
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities
of three months or less. The carrying value of cash equivalents
approximates fair value because of their short maturities. Book
overdraft cash balances have been reflected in Accounts payable
beginning in 2005 and prior periods presented have been
reclassified to conform to this presentation.
Investments
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, short-term investments
consist of variable rate demand notes and auction rate
securities. The Company defines short-term investments as
securities with original maturities of greater than three months
but less than one year. Investments in debt and equity
securities are classified by individual security as either
available-for-sale
or
held-to-maturity.
Variable rate demand notes and auction rate securities are
classified as
available-for-sale
investments and are classified as short-term.
Available-for-sale
investments are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with
current period adjustments to carrying value recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income within Shareholders
equity, net of tax. Debt securities which the Company has the
positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, are classified
as
held-to-maturity
and are carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost. The
effects of amortizing these securities are recorded in current
earnings. Realized gains and losses are recorded in income in
the period of sale.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowances
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount
and generally do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is based on an estimated amount of probable credit
losses in existing accounts receivable. The allowance is
calculated based upon a combination of historical write-off
experience, fixed percentages applied to aging categories and
specific identification based upon a review of past due balances
and problem accounts. The allowance is reviewed on at least a
quarterly basis. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance when it is determined that internal collection efforts
should no longer be pursued. The Company also maintains a
reserve for credit memos, cash discounts and product returns
which are principally calculated based upon historical
experience, specific customer agreements, as well as anticipated
future trends.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The
cost of substantially all domestic inventories (approximately
85% of total net inventory value) is determined utilizing the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method of inventory accounting. The cost of
foreign inventories and certain domestic inventories is
determined utilizing average cost or
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) methods of inventory accounting.
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment values are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repair expenditures
are charged to expense when incurred. Property, plant and
equipment placed in service prior to January 1, 1999 are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives, principally using
accelerated methods. Assets placed in service subsequent to
January 1, 1999 are depreciated over their estimated useful
lives, using straight-line methods. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease
term. Gains and losses arising on the disposal of property,
plant and equipment are included in Operating Income in the
Consolidated Statement of Income.
Capitalized
Computer Software Costs
Qualifying costs of internal use software are capitalized in
accordance with Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Capitalized costs include
purchased materials and services and payroll and payroll related
costs. General and administrative, overhead, maintenance and
training costs, as well as the cost of software that does not
add functionality to existing
50
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
systems, are expensed as incurred. The cost of internal use
software is amortized on a straight-line basis over appropriate
periods, generally five years. The unamortized balance of
internal use software is included in Intangible assets and other
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Capitalized computer software costs, net of amortization, were
$38.2 million and $33.3 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company recorded amortization
expense of $9.1 million, $5.6 million and
$1.2 million in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively,
relating to capitalized computer software.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to
the underlying net assets of acquired companies.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are subject to
annual impairment testing using the specific guidance and
criteria described in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. This testing compares carrying
values to estimated fair values and when appropriate, the
carrying value of these assets will be reduced to estimated fair
value. Fair values were calculated using a range of estimated
future operating results and primarily utilized a discounted
cash flow model. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company
performed its annual impairment testing of goodwill. This
testing resulted in fair values for each reporting unit
exceeding the reporting units carrying value, including
goodwill. The Company performed its annual impairment testing of
indefinite-lived intangible assets which resulted in no
impairment. The Companys policy is to perform its annual
goodwill impairment assessment in the second quarter of each
year unless circumstances dictate the need for more frequent
assessments. Intangible assets with definite lives are being
amortized over periods ranging from 7-30 years.
Other
Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates the potential impairment of other
long-lived assets when appropriate in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. If the
carrying value of assets exceeds the sum of the estimated future
undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the asset is
written down to estimated fair value. The Company continually
evaluates events and circumstances to determine if revisions to
values or estimates of useful lives are warranted.
Income
Taxes
The Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is
subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The IRS and other tax
authorities routinely review the Companys tax returns.
These audits can involve complex issues which may require an
extended period of time to resolve. The Company makes adequate
provisions for best estimates of exposures on previously filed
tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax
consequence of differences between financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities by applying
the currently enacted statutory tax rates in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
The effect of a change in statutory tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be
reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be
realized. The Company uses factors to assess the likelihood of
realization of deferred tax assets such as the forecast of
future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that
could be implemented to realize the deferred tax assets.
Research,
Development & Engineering
Research, development and engineering expenditures represent
costs to discover
and/or apply
new knowledge in developing a new product, process, or in
bringing about a significant improvement to an existing product
or process. Research, development and engineering expenses are
recorded as a component of Cost of goods sold. Expenses for
research, development and engineering were less than 1% of Cost
of goods sold for each of the years 2004, 2005, and 2006.
51
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Retirement
Benefits
The Company maintains various defined benefit pension plans for
its U.S. and foreign employees. Effective December 31,
2006, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132 (R). SFAS No. 158 required the Company
to recognize the funded status of its defined benefit pension
and postretirement plans as an asset or liability in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Gains or losses, prior service costs
or credits, and transition assets or obligations that have not
yet been included in net periodic benefit cost as of the end of
the year of adoption are recognized as components of Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax, within
Shareholders equity. The Companys policy is to fund
pension costs within the ranges prescribed by applicable
regulations. In addition to providing defined benefit pension
benefits, the Company provides health care and life insurance
benefits for some of its active and retired employees. The
Companys policy is to fund these benefits through
insurance premiums or as actual expenditures are made. The
Company accounts for these benefits in accordance with
SFAS No. 106 Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. See also Note
11 Retirement Benefits.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net income divided by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding and earnings per diluted share is calculated as net
income divided by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding of common stock and common stock equivalents.
Stock-Based
Employee Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. The
standard requires expensing the value of all share-based
payments, including stock options and similar awards, based upon
the awards fair value measurement on the grant date.
SFAS No. 123(R) revises SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25).
SFAS No. 123(R) is supplemented by SEC
SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payment.
SAB No. 107 expresses the SEC staffs views
regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and
certain rules and regulations including the valuation of
share-based payment arrangements. The Company adopted the
modified prospective transition method as outlined in
SFAS No. 123(R) and, therefore, prior year amounts
have not been restated. See also Note 17
Stock-Based Compensation.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income is a measure of net income and all other
changes in Shareholders equity of the Company that result
from recognized transactions and other events of the period
other than transactions with shareholders. See also
Note 19 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss).
Derivatives
To limit financial risk in the management of its assets,
liabilities and debt, the Company may use derivative financial
instruments such as: foreign currency hedges, commodity hedges,
interest rate hedges and interest rate swaps. All derivative
financial instruments are matched with an existing Company
asset, liability or proposed transaction. Market value gains or
losses on the derivative financial instrument are recognized in
income when the effects of the related price changes of the
underlying asset or liability are recognized in income. Prior to
the issuance in 2002 of $200 million, ten year non-callable
notes, the Company entered into a forward interest rate lock to
hedge its exposure to fluctuations in treasury rates, which
resulted in a loss of approximately $1.3 million. This
amount was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income
within Shareholders equity and is being amortized over the
life of the notes.
During 2006, the Company entered into a series of forward
exchange contracts to purchase U.S. dollars in order to
hedge its exposure to fluctuating rates of exchange on
anticipated inventory purchases. These contracts, each for
52
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
$1 million expire ratably over the three months through
March 2007 and have been designated as cash flow hedges in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had
$0.2 million of unrealized cash flow hedge gains and
$0.1 million of unrealized cash flow hedge losses,
respectively, on foreign currency hedges and $0.7 million
and $0.9 million, respectively, of unamortized losses on a
forward interest rate lock arrangement recorded in Accumulated
other comprehensive income. Amounts charged to income in 2006
and 2005 were immaterial.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of the tax position taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return and provides guidance related to classification and
disclosure matters. FIN 48 is effective for the Company
beginning on January 1, 2007. Based upon a preliminary
evaluation as of December 31, 2006, the Company does not
expect the interpretation to have a material impact on results
of operations or financial position.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced
guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities
and expands disclosure with respect to fair value measurements.
This statement is applicable to the Company on January 1,
2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this
standard may have on its financial statements.
Note 2
Special Charges
Full year operating results in 2006, 2005 and 2004 include
pretax special charges related to (1) actions approved
following the acquisition of LCA in April 2002, which were
undertaken to integrate and rationalize the combined lighting
operations, and (2) other capacity reduction actions which
relate to a factory closure. Both programs and all special
charges for the three years ended December 31, 2006
occurred within the Electrical segment.
The following table summarizes activity by year with respect to
special charges for the three years ending December 31,
2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY OF COSTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
Year/Program
|
|
Other Benefit Costs
|
|
|
Integration
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Write-Downs*
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
Other capacity reduction
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
Other capacity reduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting integration
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Recorded in Cost of goods sold
|
53
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Lighting
Business Integration and Rationalization Program
All charges over the past three years in connection with the
Program are the result of a series of actions related to the
consolidation of manufacturing, sales, and administrative
functions occurring throughout the commercial and industrial
lighting businesses and the relocation of the manufacturing and
assembly of commercial lighting fixture products to low cost
countries.
Charges associated with the ongoing Program primarily resulted
from the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of four indoor, commercial products facilities
within the U.S. to one facility.
|
|
|
|
Transition of manufacturing of two indoor, commercial product
lines to a low cost country.
|
|
|
|
Outsourcing of commercial product lines to low cost countries.
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of four separate locations of administrative
functions into a centralized administrative center in South
Carolina.
|
In 2006, Special charges totaled $7.5 million including
$0.2 million of inventory write-downs reflected in Cost of
goods sold. In total, $2.9 million of costs were expensed
in connection with actions initiated during the year and
$4.6 million incurred in 2006 related to actions initiated
and announced in prior years. In the fourth quarter of 2006, an
outdoor, commercial products plant closure was announced and
charges were recorded related to asset impairments of
$2.4 million and severance and benefits of
$0.5 million, including a pension curtailment charge. In
total, approximately 100 people were affected by this
announcement of which 10 have left the Company as of
December 31, 2006, with the remainder scheduled to exit in
the first quarter of 2007. The severance costs are being
recorded over the remaining service period of the affected
employees. The fixed asset write-downs represent (1) a
reduction in the carrying value of a building to fair market
value and (2), machinery and equipment write-downs to salvage
value based upon the age and location of the equipment.
Costs related to actions carried over from prior years primarily
included severance costs of $2.3 million and facility exit
and integration costs of $1.6 million related to production
and administrative transfers of commercial products businesses.
Charges of $10 million recorded in 2005 related to the
Program consisted of $5.7 million of severance and other
employee benefit costs including a pension curtailment,
$1.6 million for the write-down of equipment to fair market
value, the write-off of leasehold improvements and inventory
write-downs, and $2.7 million of other facility exit costs.
A reduction of approximately 490 employees is expected as a
result of projects initiated in 2005, of which approximately 250
employees have left the Company as of December 31, 2006
with the remainder expected in 2007. A portion of the severance
costs were recorded based upon the affected employees
remaining service period following announcement of the programs.
Asset write-downs primarily consisted of the write-down of the
assets of the outdoor, commercial facility to fair market value
and other equipment write-downs to record the equipment at
estimated salvage value. In addition to the above, the Company
recorded expenses related to facility exit costs including plant
shutdown and facility remediation.
In 2004, a $9.5 million pretax charge was recorded in
connection with the Program. Of this amount, $1.3 million
was recorded in Cost of goods sold as it related to product line
inventory write-downs. The remaining $8.2 million of
special charges related to severance ($3.3 million), asset
write-downs ($2.1 million) and facility exit costs
($2.8 million). Severance costs were a direct result of the
relocation of two manufacturing facilities, outsourcing of a
manufacturing facility to a low cost country, as well as the
relocation of one office providing administrative functions to
South Carolina. Approximately 500 employees were affected by the
actions approved
54
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
between 2002 and 2004, of which approximately 360 had left the
Company as of December 31, 2004, with the remainder
separating in 2005.
Closure
of a Wiring Device Factory
Also in 2004, the Company recorded pretax charges in connection
with the closure of a wiring device factory in Puerto Rico. The
$7.2 million special charge included $4.9 million of
asset impairments including write-offs of leasehold
improvements, and write-downs of equipment to fair market value,
which approximated salvage value due to the overall age and
location of the equipment. Severance costs of $2.0 million
were recorded. In addition, $0.3 million was recorded
related to facility exit costs.
The factory closed in the second quarter of 2005. Production
activities were either outsourced or transferred to other
existing facilities. In June 2005, the Company recorded an
additional $0.9 million of pretax special charges
consisting of $0.3 million of inventory write-downs and
$0.6 million of facility related exit costs. Approximately
200 employees were impacted by this action, all of whom have
left the Company as of December 31, 2006.
The following table sets forth the components of special charges
recorded and accrued in 2004 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
Accrued End
|
|
|
|
of Year Balance
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
Write-downs
|
|
|
of Year Balance
|
|
|
Lighting Business Integration
Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
3.8
|
*
|
2006
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
6.0
|
*
|
Wiring Device Factory
Closure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2006
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Included in the accrued balance at December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 is $3.2 million and
$3.0 million, respectively, of accrued pension curtailment
costs classified in Other Non-Current Liabilities within the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006 and 2005. |
Note 3
Business Acquisitions
On June 1, 2006, the Company purchased all of the
outstanding common stock of Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc. for
$117.4 million in cash. Strongwell Lenoir City, Inc.
(renamed Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc.) has been added to the Power
segment and the results of operations after June 1, 2006
are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
acquired business has manufacturing facilities in Lenoir City,
TN and San Jose, CA. Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. designs and
manufactures precast polymer concrete products used to house
underground equipment and also has a line of surface drain
products. These products are sold to the electrical utility and
telecommunications industries. Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc.
complements the existing product lines and shares a similar
customer base to the existing businesses within the Power
segment.
On November 1, 2006, the Company purchased all of the
outstanding common stock of Austdac for $28.1 million, net
of $2.3 million of cash acquired. Austdac is based in New
South Wales, Australia and manufactures a wide range of products
used in harsh and hazardous applications in a variety of
industries. Austdac has been added to the Industrial Technology
segment.
55
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company is in the process of finalizing the determination of
fair values of the underlying assets and liabilities and, as a
result, the allocations of purchase price related to the
acquisitions discussed above could change. The following table
summarizes the preliminary allocations of the purchase price to
estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the purchase dates for the above noted acquired
companies, in millions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lenoir City
|
|
|
Austdac
|
|
|
Total purchase price including
transaction expenses, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value assigned to assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Amounts assigned to intangible
assets
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Amount allocated to goodwill
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocation
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value assigned to net assets acquired primarily relates
to inventory and fixed assets. Intangible assets identified
primarily consist of tradenames and customer lists. The
tradenames are being amortized over a period of 30 years
and customer lists are being amortized over a period of
7-10 years. The excess of purchase price over the fair
values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and identifiable
intangible assets has been allocated to goodwill. All of the
goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
In 2005, the Company acquired five businesses through separate
transactions. Total cash expended in 2005 on these acquisitions,
including fees and expenses and net of cash acquired, was
$54.3 million. In 2006 the Company paid out an additional
$0.2 million related to an acquisition in the Power segment.
A total of $23.9 million of purchase price including fees
and expenses was attributable to the purchase of two businesses
in the third quarter of 2005 in the Industrial Technology
segment; one which manufactures pressure switches for industrial
markets and the other which manufactures contactors and switches
used in the locomotive and industrial markets.
A total of $11.8 million of purchase price including fees
and expenses was attributable to the purchase in the third
quarter of 2005 of a harsh and hazardous lighting company
located in the United Kingdom, which was added to the Electrical
segment.
A total of $18.6 million of purchase price including fees
and expenses and net of cash acquired and debt assumed in 2005
and an additional $0.2 million in 2006 was attributable to
the purchase of two businesses in the Power segment; a civil
anchor business and a Brazilian manufacturer of surge arresters,
cutouts and other products serving the utility industry.
The accounting for the purchase of these businesses acquired in
2005, including adjustments made in 2006, is complete as of
December 31, 2006. The following table summarizes the final
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of
December 31, 2006, in millions.
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price including
transaction expenses, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
54.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value assigned to net assets
acquired
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
Amounts assigned to intangible
assets
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Amount allocated to goodwill
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocation
|
|
$
|
54.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets identified consist primarily of tradenames and
customer lists. The tradenames are being amortized over a period
of 30 years. The customer lists and other intangibles are
generally amortized over periods ranging from 7-15 years.
The excess of purchase price over the fair values of assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and
56
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
identifiable intangible assets has been allocated to goodwill. A
majority of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes.
Note 4
Receivables and Allowances
Receivables consist of the following components at
December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
368.2
|
|
|
$
|
322.6
|
|
Non-trade receivables
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
378.3
|
|
|
|
331.9
|
|
Allowance for credit memos,
returns, and cash discounts
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowances
|
|
|
(24.0
|
)
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
354.3
|
|
|
$
|
310.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5
Inventories
Inventories are classified as follows at December 31, (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Raw Material
|
|
$
|
106.6
|
|
|
$
|
83.0
|
|
Work-in-Process
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
|
Finished Goods
|
|
|
239.6
|
|
|
|
151.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409.7
|
|
|
|
288.2
|
|
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost basis
|
|
|
(71.5
|
)
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
338.2
|
|
|
$
|
237.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, by segment, were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
172.3
|
|
|
$
|
112.7
|
|
|
$
|
41.6
|
|
|
$
|
326.6
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
175.9
|
|
|
|
122.1
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
351.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
78.2
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
181.4
|
|
|
$
|
184.9
|
|
|
$
|
70.4
|
|
|
$
|
436.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006 and 2005 the Company recorded additions to goodwill in
connection with the purchase accounting for acquisitions. See
also Note 3 Business Acquisitions. Included in
2006 acquisitions in the Power segment is $61.6 million of
goodwill from the acquisition of Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc. and
$0.2 million related to a final adjustment of acquisition
costs related to the 2005 acquisition of a Brazilian
manufacturer serving the utility
57
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
industry. Included in 2006 acquisitions in the Industrial
Technology segment is $14.3 million of goodwill from the
acquisition of Austdac and a $2.1 million adjustment to
goodwill for the 2005 acquisition of a pressure switch business.
In 2005, acquisitions consisted of the purchase of five separate
businesses of which one is in the Electrical segment and two are
in each of the Power and Industrial Technology segments.
Identifiable intangible assets are recorded in Intangible assets
and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Identifiable
intangible assets are comprised of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Definite-lived:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents and trademarks
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks and other
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
82.1
|
|
|
$
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
45.0
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other definite-lived intangibles consist primarily of customer
relationships and technology.
Amortization expense in 2006 and 2005 was $3.5 million and
$1.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense is
expected to be $4.5 million in 2007, $4.3 million in
2008 and 2009, and $4.1 million in 2010 and 2011.
Note 7
Investments
At December 31, 2006,
available-for-sale
investments consisted of variable rate demand notes. At
December 31, 2005, available-for-sale investments consisted
of auction rate securities, U.S. Treasury Notes, and
municipal, corporate, and asset-backed bonds. These investments
are stated at fair market value based on current quotes. At
December 31, 2006,
held-to-maturity
investments consisted of Missouri state bonds. At
December 31, 2005, held-to-maturity investments consisted
of a Commonwealth of Puerto Rico bond. These held-to-maturity
investments have been stated at amortized cost. There were no
securities during 2006 and 2005 that were classified as trading
investments.
The following table sets forth selected data with respect to the
Companys investments at December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale
Investments
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
179.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity
Investments
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
21.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
$
|
36.2
|
|
|
$
|
200.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
200.2
|
|
|
$
|
200.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contractual maturities of
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
investments at December 31, 2006 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 10 years
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
After 1 year but within
5 years
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the
available-for-sale
amounts above are variable rate demand notes of
$35.9 million and auction rate securities of
$100 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These securities are reset to current interest
rates periodically, typically every 28, 35 or 49 days.
The 2006 amounts have been classified as having maturities
beyond ten years in the table above.
In 2006, the Company recorded a $0.3 million credit to net
unrealized gain/(loss) on
available-for-sale
securities that has been included in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. In both 2005 and 2004,
the Company recorded $0.3 million of charges to net
unrealized gains/(loss). The cost basis used in computing the
gain or loss on these securities was through specific
identification. Realized gains and losses were immaterial in
2006, 2005 and 2004.
Note 8
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment, carried at cost, is summarized
as follows at December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
30.9
|
|
|
$
|
23.5
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
Machinery, tools and equipment
|
|
|
526.2
|
|
|
|
514.0
|
|
Construction-in-progress
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant, and
equipment
|
|
|
789.7
|
|
|
|
721.0
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(471.2
|
)
|
|
|
(453.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$
|
318.5
|
|
|
$
|
267.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable lives on buildings range between
20-40 years.
Depreciable lives on machinery, tools, and equipment range
between 3-20 years. The Company recorded depreciation
expense of $42.3 million, $42.7 million and
$45.1 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company sold a factory/office
building within the Electrical segment and entered into a
sale-leaseback transaction for a term of five years for a
portion of the facility. In connection with the sale of the
building in 2005, the Company recorded cash proceeds of
$11.6 million and recorded a $1.3 million receivable
for additional cash proceeds which were received in 2006. The
sales transaction resulted in a prior year gain of
$7.9 million of which $4.9 million was recognized as a
reduction of S&A expenses in 2005 and $3.0 million was
deferred and is being recognized as a reduction of rent expense
over the five year lease term.
59
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 9
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other Accrued Liabilities consists of the following at
December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Insurance accruals
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
$
|
38.2
|
|
Customer program incentives
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
109.9
|
|
|
$
|
89.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10
Other Non-Current Liabilities
Other Non-Current Liabilities consists of the following at
December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
$
|
79.2
|
|
|
$
|
38.6
|
|
Other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
154.4
|
|
|
$
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
Retirement Benefits
The Company has funded and unfunded non-contributory U.S. and
foreign defined benefit pension plans. Benefits under these
plans are generally provided based on either years of service
and final average pay or a specified dollar amount per year of
service. The Company also maintains four defined contribution
plans.
Effective January 1, 2004, the defined benefit pension plan
for U.S. salaried and non-collectively bargained hourly
employees was closed to employees hired on or after
January 1, 2004. Effective January 1, 2006, the
defined benefit pension plan for the Hubbell Canada salaried
employees was closed to existing employees who did not meet
certain age and service requirements as well as all new
employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. Effective
January 1, 2007 the defined benefit plan for Hubbells
U.K. operations was closed to all new employees hired on or
after January 1, 2007. These U.S., Canadian and U.K.
employees are eligible instead for defined contribution plans.
The Company also has health care and life insurance benefit
plans covering eligible employees who reached retirement age
while working for the Company. These benefits were discontinued
in 1991 for substantially all future retirees, with the
exception of Anderson Electrical Products which discontinued its
plan for future retirees in 2004 and A.B. Chance Company which
still maintains a limited retiree medical plan for its union
employees. The plans anticipate future cost-sharing changes that
are consistent with the Companys past practices.
None of the acquisitions in 2006 or 2005 impacted defined
benefit pension or other benefit assets or liabilities.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all of
its plans. No amendments made in 2006 to the defined benefit
pension plans had a significant impact on the total pension
benefit obligation. Amendments made during 2005 to the
Companys defined benefit plans decreased the total pension
benefit obligation by $1.4 million.
60
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of beginning
and ending balances of the benefit obligations and the plan
assets for the Companys defined benefit pension and other
benefit plans at December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change in benefit
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
580.4
|
|
|
$
|
512.4
|
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
|
$
|
40.3
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Plan participants
contributions
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement loss
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(27.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
591.4
|
|
|
$
|
580.4
|
|
|
$
|
33.6
|
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
481.9
|
|
|
$
|
426.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan participants
contributions
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(27.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of year
|
|
$
|
531.6
|
|
|
$
|
481.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(59.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41.3
|
)
|
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost
|
|
$
|
(59.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pensions
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
34.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
(short-term and long-term)
|
|
|
(82.3
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
)
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
|
(32.0
|
)
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), pretax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(59.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
(33.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax amounts recognized in
Accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
57.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
58.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $523.3 million and $515.4 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Information with
respect to plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess
of plan assets is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
64.4
|
|
|
$
|
65.0
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
54.2
|
|
|
$
|
56.1
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, additional liabilities to
recognize the required minimum liability were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Minimum liability included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in minimum
liability included in other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
No amortization of unrecognized loss (gain) or prior service
cost (credit) was recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive
income during either 2005 or 2006. The estimated unrecognized
net loss and prior service (credit) for the defined benefit
pension plans that will amortize from Accumulated other
comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2007 are
$2.1 million and ($0.3) million, respectively. The
estimated prior service (credit) for other postretirement
benefit plans that will amortize from Accumulated other
comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost in 2007 is
($0.2) million.
The following table summarizes the effect of the additional
minimum liability (AML) and the initial adoption of
SFAS No. 158 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Before Application
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Application
|
|
|
|
of AML and
|
|
|
AML
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
of AML and
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
Pension and OPEB deferred taxes,
net
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.7
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
Pension intangible
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
(48.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(36.3
|
)
|
|
|
(82.3
|
)
|
Postretirement liabilities
|
|
|
(32.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income-pension
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
62
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the components of pension and
other benefits cost for the years ended December 31, (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Components of net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
17.9
|
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(37.5
|
)
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial losses
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement losses
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above, certain of the Companys union
employees participate in multi-employer defined benefit plans.
The total Company cost of these plans was $0.7 million in
2006, $0.5 million in 2005 and $0.6 million in 2004.
The Company also maintains four defined contribution pension
plans (excluding an employer match for the 401(k) plan). The
total cost of these plans was $5.6 million in 2006,
$3.6 million in 2005 and $2.9 million in 2004. This
cost is not included in the above net periodic benefit cost for
the defined benefit pension plans.
Assumptions
The following assumptions were used to determine the projected
benefit obligations at the measurement date and the net periodic
benefit cost for the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions
used to determine
benefit obligations at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions
used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
At the beginning of each calendar year, the Company determines
the appropriate expected return on assets for each plan based
upon its strategic asset allocation (see discussion below). In
making this determination, the Company utilizes expected returns
for each asset class based upon current market conditions and
expected risk premiums for each asset class.
63
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the
projected postretirement benefit obligation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend
rates at
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend assumed for
next year
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Rate to which the cost trend is
assumed to decline
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the
ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the postretirement benefit plans. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
Effect on total of service and
interest cost
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
In December 2003, President Bush signed into law the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(the Act). The Act expanded Medicare to include
coverage for prescription drugs. This legislation resulted in a
reduction of $2.6 million in the Companys benefit
obligation as of December 31, 2005 and resulted in a pretax
benefit of approximately $0.2 million in 2006.
Plan
Assets
The Companys combined domestic and foreign pension plans
weighted average asset allocation at December 31, 2006 and
2005, and 2007 target allocation by asset category are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Debt Securities & Cash
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a written investment policy and asset allocation
guidelines for its domestic and foreign pension plans. In
establishing these policies, the Company has considered that its
various pension plans are a major retirement vehicle for most
plan participants and has acted to discharge its fiduciary
responsibilities with regard to the plans solely in the interest
of such participants and their beneficiaries. The goal
underlying the establishment of the investment policies is to
provide that pension assets shall be invested in a prudent
manner and so that, together with the expected contributions to
the plans, the funds will be sufficient to meet the obligations
of the plans as they become due. To achieve this result, the
Company conducts a periodic strategic asset allocation study to
form a basis for the allocation of pension assets between
various asset categories. Specific policy benchmark percentages
are assigned to each asset category with minimum and maximum
ranges established for each. The assets are then tactically
managed within these ranges. At no time may derivatives be
utilized to leverage the asset portfolio.
Equity securities include Company common stock in the amounts of
$15.5 million (3% of total plan assets) and
$14.8 million (3% of total plan assets) at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
64
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys other postretirement benefits are unfunded.
Therefore, no asset information is reported.
Cash
Flows
Contributions
The Company contributed $15 million in the first quarter of
2007 to its domestic, qualified, defined benefit pension plans.
The Company expects to contribute $5-$7 million to its
foreign plans in 2007.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments
The following domestic and foreign benefit payments, which
reflect future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Subsidy
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
25.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
28.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
29.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
31.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
$
|
178.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
Note 12
Debt
The following table sets forth the components of the
Companys debt structure at December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
(Current and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
(Long-Term)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Long-Term)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at year end
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
|
$
|
220.2
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
|
$
|
199.2
|
|
|
$
|
228.8
|
|
Highest aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
month-end balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
259.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
307.3
|
|
Average borrowings
|
|
$
|
24.5
|
|
|
$
|
199.3
|
|
|
$
|
223.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
$
|
274.1
|
|
|
$
|
287.8
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
6.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
6.18
|
%
|
Paid during the year
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
|
6.31
|
%
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
6.46
|
%
|
|
|
6.36
|
%
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had
$20.9 million and $29.6 million, respectively, of debt
reflected as Short-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The 2006 short-term debt consisted of a $5.1 million money
market loan and $15.8 million of commercial paper. The 2005
short-term debt consisted of a $7.5 million money market
loan, $22.0 million of borrowings against the
Companys Credit Facility, and $0.1 million of other
borrowings. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had
$199.3 million and $199.2 million, respectively, of
senior notes reflected as Long-Term Debt in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
At December 31, 2006, the unused portion of the money
market loan was 2.4 million pounds sterling
($4.7 million U.S.). The interest rate applicable to
borrowings under the loan is a surcharge over LIBOR. There are
no annual commitment fees associated with this loan.
65
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest and fees paid related to total indebtedness totaled
$14.8 million for 2006, $18.6 million in 2005 and
$19.8 million in 2004. During 2005, the Company amended and
restated its domestic bank credit agreement to admit a
wholly-owned foreign subsidiary as a borrower. This amendment
and restatement was required in order for the Company to
repatriate foreign earnings at a reduced tax rate under the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. This repatriation was
accomplished by borrowing $22.0 million, via the Credit
Facility and through cash held outside the U.S. At
December 31, 2006 and through the filing date of this
Form 10-K,
the Company had domestic unused bank credit commitments of
$200 million. The expiration date of the amended Credit
Facility is October 20, 2009. The interest rate applicable
to borrowings under the credit agreement is either the prime
rate or a surcharge over LIBOR. Annual commitment fee
requirements to support availability of the Companys
Credit Facility at December 31, 2006, totaled approximately
$0.2 million. The Credit Facility includes covenants that
shareholders equity will be greater than $675 million
and total debt will not exceed 55% of total capitalization
(defined as total debt plus total shareholders equity).
The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants at
December 31, 2006 and 2005. In addition, the Company has an
unsecured line of credit for $40 million to support
issuance of its letters of credit. At December 31, 2006 the
Company had approximately $38 million of letters of credit
outstanding under this facility.
In October 1995, the Company issued ten year, non-callable notes
due in 2005 at face value of $100 million and a fixed
interest rate of 6.625%. These notes were fully repaid in
October 2005 using a combination of cash and commercial paper
borrowings. In May 2002, the Company issued ten year, non-
callable notes due in 2012 at face value of $200 million
and a fixed interest rate of 6.375%. These notes are fixed rate
indebtedness, are not callable and are only subject to
accelerated payment prior to maturity if we fail to meet certain
non-financial covenants, all of which were met at
December 31, 2006 and 2005. The most restrictive of these
covenants limits our ability to enter into mortgages and
sale-leasebacks of property having a net book value in excess of
$5 million without the approval of the Note holders.
Note 13
Income Taxes
The following table sets forth selected data with respect to the
Companys income tax provisions for the years ended
December 31, (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Income before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
151.1
|
|
|
$
|
178.8
|
|
|
$
|
169.6
|
|
International
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
221.5
|
|
|
$
|
215.7
|
|
|
$
|
197.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income
taxes current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
|
$
|
29.5
|
|
|
$
|
19.7
|
|
State
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
International
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision-current
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income
taxes deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
State
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
International
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision
deferred
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
63.4
|
|
|
$
|
50.6
|
|
|
$
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Beginning in 2006, the Companys Puerto Rico operations are
classified as International for tax purposes as these operations
now conduct business as foreign corporations.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from differences in
the basis of assets and liabilities for tax and financial
statement purposes. The components of the deferred tax
assets/(liabilities) at December 31, were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current tax
assets/(liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
LIFO inventory of acquired
businesses
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
Income tax credits
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous other
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax asset (included
in Deferred taxes and other)
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current tax
assets/(liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous other
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current tax
assets (included in Intangible assets and other)
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(41.2
|
)
|
|
|
(44.8
|
)
|
Pension
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Foreign operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Postretirement and post-employment
benefits
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Miscellaneous other
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current tax liabilities
(included in Other Non-Current Liabilities)
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities, net
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (included in
Other Non-Current Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management determined that no valuation allowances are required
at December 31, 2006. A valuation allowance in the amount
of $0.6 million was required at December 31, 2005 for
the tax operating loss carryforward benefits associated with (or
related to) certain international locations because it was more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset would
not be utilized in the future. At December 31, 2006, income
and withholding taxes have not been provided on approximately
$128 million of undistributed international earnings that
are permanently reinvested in international operations. If such
earnings were not indefinitely reinvested, a tax liability of
approximately $16.8 million would be recognized.
Cash payments of income taxes were $51.4 million in 2006,
$41.7 million in 2005 and $31.1 million in 2004.
67
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The consolidated effective income tax rate varied from the
United States federal statutory income tax rate for the years
ended December 31, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal
benefit
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Foreign income taxes
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Non-taxable income from Puerto
Rico operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
IRS audit settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
R & D credit refund claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated effective income tax
rate
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2005 consolidated effective income tax rate reflected the
impact of tax benefits of $10.8 million recorded in
connection with the completion of an IRS examination of the
Companys 2002 and 2003 tax returns. The 2004 consolidated
effective income tax rate reflected the impact of tax benefits
of $10.2 million recorded in connection with the closing of
an IRS examination of the Companys tax returns through
2001, which included refund claims for the years 1995 through
2000 related to research and development activities during these
years.
FIN 48 is effective for the Company beginning on
January 1, 2007. Based upon a preliminary evaluation as of
December 31, 2006, the Company does not expect the
interpretation to have a material impact on results of
operations or financial condition.
Note 14
Financial Instruments
Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk
consist of trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments. The Company grants credit terms in the
normal course of business to its customers. Due to the diversity
of its product lines, the Company has an extensive customer base
including electrical distributors and wholesalers, electric
utilities, equipment manufacturers, electrical contractors,
telephone operating companies and retail and hardware outlets.
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of total sales in
any year during the three years ended December 31, 2006.
However, the Companys top 10 customers accounted for
approximately 27% of the accounts receivable balance at
December 31, 2006. As part of its ongoing procedures, the
Company monitors the credit worthiness of its customers. Bad
debt write-offs have historically been minimal. The Company
places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions
and limits the amount of exposure to any one institution.
Fair Value: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated
balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, receivables, bank borrowings, accounts payable and
accruals approximate their fair values given the immediate or
short-term nature of these items. See also
Note 7 Investments.
The fair value of the senior notes classified as long-term debt
was determined by reference to quoted market prices of
securities with similar characteristics and approximated
$209.7 million and $215.1 million at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Note 15
Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
and Legal
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations
which may require that it investigate and remediate the effects
of potential contamination associated with past and present
operations. The Company is also subject to various legal
proceedings and claims, including those relating to
workers compensation, product liability and environmental
matters, including, for each, past production of product
containing toxic substances, which have
68
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
arisen in the normal course of its operations. Estimates of
future liability with respect to such matters are based on an
evaluation of currently available facts. Liabilities are
recorded when it is probable that costs will be incurred and can
be reasonably estimated. Given the nature of matters involved,
it is possible that liabilities will be incurred in excess of
amounts currently recorded. However, based upon available
information, including the Companys past experience, and
reserves, management believes that the ultimate liability with
respect to these matters will not have a material affect on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company adopted the provision
of FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
(FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies the term
conditional asset retirement obligation as used in
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations to refer to a legal obligation to perform an
asset retirement activity in which the timing
and/or
method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may
or may not be within the control of the Company. Accordingly, an
entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value
of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value
of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Companys
adoption of FIN 47 resulted in recording a liability of
$0.7 million for certain legal obligations pertaining to
environmental matters which were estimatable. The liability
recorded was charged directly to income and was not reflected as
a cumulative effect adjustment due to the amount not being
material. In addition to the amount recorded, the Company
identified other legal obligations related to environmental
clean up for which a settlement date could not be determined.
Management does not believe these items were material to the
Companys results of operations, financial position or cash
flows as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. This interpretation
would not have a material impact on results of operations,
financial position or cash flows had it been applied to all
periods presented. The Company will continue to monitor and
revalue its liability as necessary.
Leases
Total rental expense under operating leases was
$19.1 million in 2006, $16.6 million in 2005 and
$15.8 million in 2004. The minimum annual rentals on
non-cancelable, long-term, operating leases in effect at
December 31, 2006 are expected to approximate
$8.6 million in 2007, $6.9 million in 2008,
$5.0 million in 2009, $4.1 million in 2010,
$2.6 million in 2011 and $15.8 million thereafter. The
Company accounts for its leases in accordance with
SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The
Companys leases consist of operating leases primarily for
buildings or equipment. The terms for building leases typically
range from 5-25 years with 5-10 year renewal periods.
69
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 16
Capital Stock
Activity in the Companys common shares outstanding is set
forth below for the three years ended December 31, 2006 (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
9,490
|
|
|
|
50,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
Acquisition/surrender of shares
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
9,351
|
|
|
|
51,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
Shares issued under compensation
arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Non-vested shares issued under
compensation arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Acquisition/surrender of shares
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
9,128
|
|
|
|
51,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Shares issued under compensation
arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Non-vested shares issued under
compensation arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Acquisition/surrender of shares
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
52,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased shares are retired when acquired and the purchase
price is charged against par value and additional paid-in
capital. Shares may be repurchased through the Companys
stock repurchase program or acquired by the Company from
employees under the Hubbell Incorporated Stock Option Plan for
Key Employees (Option Plan). Voting rights per
share: Class A Common twenty; Class B
Common one. In addition, the Company has
5.9 million authorized shares of preferred stock; no
preferred shares are outstanding.
The Company has a Stockholder Rights Agreement under which
holders of Class A Common Stock have Class A Rights
and holders of Class B Common Stock have Class B
Rights. These Rights become exercisable after a specified period
of time only if a person or group of affiliated persons acquires
beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of the
outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company or
announces or commences a tender or exchange offer that would
result in the offeror acquiring beneficial ownership of
20 percent or more of the outstanding Class A Common
Stock of the Company. Each Class A Right entitles the
holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a
share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
(Series A Preferred Stock), without par value,
at a price of $175.00 per one one-thousandth of a share.
Similarly, each Class B Right entitles the holder to
purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series B Junior
Participating Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred
Stock), without par value, at a price of $175.00 per
one one-thousandth of a share. The Rights may be redeemed by the
Company for one cent per Right prior to the day a person or
group of affiliated persons acquires 20 percent or more of
the outstanding Class A Common Stock of the Company. The
Rights expire on December 31, 2008, unless earlier redeemed
by the Company.
Shares of Series A Preferred Stock or Series B
Preferred Stock purchasable upon exercise of the Rights will not
be redeemable. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock or
Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled, when, as and if
declared, to a minimum preferential quarterly dividend payment
of $10.00 per share but will be entitled to an aggregate
dividend of 1,000 times the dividend declared per share of
Common Stock. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the
Series A Preferred Stock or Series B Preferred Stock
will be entitled to a minimum preferential
70
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
liquidation payment of $100 per share (plus any accrued but
unpaid dividends) but will be entitled to an aggregate payment
of 1,000 times the payment made per share of Class A Common
Stock or Class B Common Stock, respectively. Each share of
Series A Preferred Stock will have 20,000 votes and each
share of Series B Preferred Stock will have 1,000 votes,
voting together with the Common Stock. Finally, in the event of
any merger, consolidation, transfer of assets or earning power
or other transaction in which shares of Common Stock are
converted or exchanged, each share of Series A Preferred
Stock or Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to
receive 1,000 times the amount received per share of Common
Stock. These rights are protected by customary antidilution
provisions.
Upon the occurrence of certain events or transactions specified
in the Rights Agreement, each holder of a Right will have the
right to receive, upon exercise, that number of shares of the
Companys common stock or the acquiring companys
shares having a market value equal to twice the exercise price.
Shares of the Companys common stock were reserved at
December 31, 2006 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Exercise of outstanding stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future grant of stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock purchase rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Shares reserved under other equity
compensation plans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10,411
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17
Stock-Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had various
stock-based awards outstanding which were issued to executives
and other key employees. These awards have been accounted for
using SFAS No. 123 (R) which was adopted on
January 1, 2006. The Company recognizes the cost of these
awards on a straight line attribution basis over their
respective vesting periods, net of estimated forfeitures. The
Company adopted the modified prospective transition method as
outlined in SFAS 123 (R) and, therefore, prior year
amounts have not been restated.
In 2005, the Company adopted a new long-term incentive program
for awarding stock-based compensation using a combination of
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights (SARs),
and performance shares on the Companys Class B Common
Stock. In 2006, the Company issued stock-based awards using a
combination of restricted stock and stock appreciation rights
(SARs). These awards were made pursuant to the
Hubbell Incorporated 2005 Incentive Award Plan (the Award
Plan). In 2004 and 2003 the Company granted stock option
awards on the Companys Class B Common Stock under the
Option Plan.
In 2006, the Company recorded $11.9 million of stock-based
compensation, of which $11.8 million was recorded as
expense and $0.1 million was capitalized to inventory. Of
the total expense of $11.8 million, $11.3 million was
recorded to S&A expense and $0.5 million was recorded
to Cost of goods sold. Of the total 2006 expense, approximately
$6.4 million relates to the expensing of stock options
which would not have been expensed but for the adoption of
SFAS 123 (R). In 2005, the Company recorded total
S&A expense of $0.7 million related to stock-based
compensation. The Company recorded income tax benefits of
approximately $4.5 million and $0.3 million in 2006
and 2005, respectively, related to stock-based compensation. At
December 31, 2006, these benefits are recorded as either a
deferred tax asset in Deferred taxes and other or in Accrued
income taxes in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of
December 31, 2006, there was $21.5 million, pretax, of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to
be recognized through November 2009.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that share-based compensation
expense be recognized over the period from the grant date to the
date on which the award is no longer contingent on the employee
providing additional service (the
71
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
substantive vesting period). In periods prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), share-based compensation
expense was recorded for
retirement-eligible
employees over the awards stated vesting period. With the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company continues to
follow the stated vesting period for the unvested portions of
awards granted prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
and follows the substantive vesting period for awards granted
after the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
Each of the compensation arrangements is discussed below.
Restricted
Stock
The restricted stock granted to date is not transferable and is
subject to forfeiture in the event of the recipients
termination of employment prior to vesting. The restricted stock
will generally vest in one-third increments annually for three
years on each anniversary of the date of grant or completely
upon a change in control, termination of employment by reason of
death or disability. Recipients are entitled to receive
dividends and voting rights on their restricted stock regardless
of vesting. The fair values are measured using the average
between the high and low trading prices of the Companys
Class B Common Stock on the measurement date.
Stock
Issued to Non-employee Directors
In 2005, the compensation program for non-employee directors was
changed to include an annual grant of 350 shares of
Class B Common Stock of the Company. Each non-employee
director received a grant of 350 shares in December 2005 at
a grant price of $49.29 for services during 2005. The shares
received were not subject to any restrictions on transfer and
were fully vested at grant date. Commencing in 2006, each
non-employee director who is re-elected, or first elected to the
Board will receive a grant of 350 shares of Class B
Common Stock each year on the date of the annual meeting of
shareholders. These shares will be subject to forfeiture if the
directors service terminates prior to the date of the next
regularly scheduled annual meeting of shareholders to be held in
the following calendar year. In the second quarter of 2006, the
Company issued 350 shares to each of the eight
non-management members of its Board of Directors for a total of
2,800 shares.
Activity related to restricted stock for the year ended
December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
49.08
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
52.82
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
49.04
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
49.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
51.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Appreciation Rights
The SARs granted to date entitle the recipient to the difference
between the fair market value of the Companys Class B
Common Stock on the date of exercise and the grant price as
determined using the average between the high and the low
trading prices of the Companys Class B Common Stock
on the measurement date. This amount is payable in shares of the
Companys Class B Common Stock. One-third of the SARs
vest and become exercisable each year for three years on the
anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years after the
grant date.
72
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activity related to SARs for the year ended December 31,
2006 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Average Value
|
|
Non-vested SARs at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
49.76
|
|
SARs granted
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
52.85
|
|
SARs vested
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
49.76
|
|
SARs forfeited
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
49.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested SARs at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
51.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the SARs was measured using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The following table summarizes the related
assumptions used to determine the fair value of the SARs granted
during the periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of
the Companys stock and other factors. The Company uses
historical data as well as other factors to estimate exercise
behavior and employee termination. The expected term of SARs
granted is based upon historical trends of stock option behavior
as well as future projections. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant for the expected term of award.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
Expected
|
|
Risk Free
|
|
Expected
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Volatility
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Term
|
|
of 1 SAR
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
6 Years
|
|
|
$
|
11.47
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
6 Years
|
|
|
$
|
11.10
|
|
Performance
Shares
In 2005, the Company granted 35,178 performance shares. These
performance shares vest and become deliverable based upon
satisfaction of performance criteria established by the
Companys Compensation Committee. The criteria are based
upon the Companys average growth in earnings per share
compared to a peer group of electrical and electronic equipment
companies over a three-year period. Performance at target will
result in vesting and issuance of the performance shares.
Performance below or above target can result in payment in the
range of 0%-250% of the number of shares granted. Performance
shares are issued on the third anniversary of the date of grant
assuming the performance measures have been met. The fair value
of the performance shares is $46.23, which was measured using
the average between the high and low trading prices of the
Companys Class B Common Stock on the measurement
date, discounted for the non-payment of dividends during the
requisite period. No shares have vested or been forfeited during
2005 or 2006. There were no performance shares granted in 2006.
In 2006, no stock-based compensation was recorded due to the
fact that the performance criteria was deemed not probable of
being met at the end of the vesting period. As of
December 31, 2006, 35,178 performance shares were
outstanding.
Stock
Option Awards
The Company granted options to officers and other key employees
to purchase the Companys Class B Common Stock in
previous years. Options issued in 2004 and 2003 were partially
vested on January 1, 2006, the effective date of
SFAS 123(R). All options granted had an exercise price
equal to the average between the high and low trading prices of
the Companys Class B Common Stock on the measurement
date. These option awards generally vest annually over a
three-year period and expire after ten years.
73
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2006
is set forth below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Option Price Per
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Share Range
|
|
Average
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
5,942
|
|
|
$
|
24.59-$47.95
|
|
|
$
|
39.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
24.59-$47.95
|
|
|
$
|
36.75
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
$
|
24.59-$47.95
|
|
|
$
|
40.38
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
44.31-$47.95
|
|
|
$
|
46.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
$
|
24.59-$47.95
|
|
|
$
|
39.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock option exercises during
2006, 2005 and 2004 was $16.9 million, $22.4 million
and $18.6 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic
value of both outstanding stock option awards and fully vested
awards at December 31, 2006 was $28 million as all
non-vested awards had an exercise price above the market price
on December 31, 2006. Shares fully vested at
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 were 4,245, 4,937 and
4,983, respectively. Exercises of existing stock option grants
are expected to be settled in the Companys Class B
Common Stock as authorized in the Option Plan.
The following table sets forth information related to options
outstanding and fully vested at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
Shares Fully Vested
|
|
Average Remaining
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
$
|
42.84
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
$
|
27.47
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
$
|
27.47
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
$
|
42.52
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
$
|
41.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
$
|
39.61
|
|
|
|
4,245
|
|
|
$
|
36.38
|
|
Under the Companys Award Plan, the Company may authorize
up to 5.9 million shares of Class B Common Stock in
settlement of grants of stock options, restricted stock,
performance shares, or SARs. The Companys policy is to
issue new shares for settlement of any stock-based awards.
74
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for stock
options in 2005 and 2004 (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based method,
net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
158.9
|
|
|
$
|
149.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma amounts and fair value of each option grant were
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Option Term
|
|
|
of 1 Option
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
7 Years
|
|
|
$
|
11.31
|
|
Cash received from option exercises was $38.5 million,
$32.8 million and $30.5 million for 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. The Company recorded a realized tax benefit
from the exercise of stock options of $6.0 million for the
period ended December 31, 2006, which has been included in
Cash Flows From Financing Activities in the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows as prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R).
The Company recorded a realized tax benefit from the exercise of
stock options of $7.8 million and $6.7 million for the
periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
which has been included in Other, net within Cash Flows From
Operating Activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
The Company has elected to adopt the shortcut method for
determining the initial pool of excess tax benefits available to
absorb tax deficiencies related to stock-based compensation
subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R in accordance with
the provisions of FASB Staff
Position No. 123(R)-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effect
of
Share-Based
Payment Awards. The shortcut method includes simplified
procedures to establish the beginning balance of the pool of
excess tax benefits (the APIC Tax Pool) and to
determine the subsequent effect on the APIC Tax Pool and
Consolidated Cash Flow Statements of the effects of employee
stock-based
compensation awards.
75
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 18
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of Earnings per
share for the three years ended December 31, (in millions,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
165.1
|
|
|
$
|
154.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
Potential dilutive shares
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares
outstanding (diluted)
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.62
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
|
$
|
2.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain common stock equivalents were not included in the full
year computation of diluted earnings per share because the
effect would be anti-dilutive. Anti-dilutive common stock and
common stock equivalents excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share were 0.7 million and
1.0 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Stock appreciation rights and performance-based
shares of 1.0 million and 0.6 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were also
excluded as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 19
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table reflects the accumulated balances of other
comprehensive income (loss) (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
(Loss) on
|
|
|
Hedging
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.7
|
)
|
2004 activity
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
2005 activity
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
2006 activity
|
|
|
(34.7
|
)
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
(38.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pension liability adjustment for 2006 includes the reversal
of a minimum pension liability of $2.1 million and a charge
of $36.8 million related to the adoption of
SFAS No. 158.
Note 20
Industry Segments and Geographic Area Information
Nature
of Operations
Hubbell Incorporated was founded as a proprietorship in 1888,
and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905. Hubbell designs,
manufactures and sells high quality electrical and electronic
products for a broad range of commercial, industrial,
telecommunications, utility, and residential applications.
Products are either sourced complete or manufactured or
assembled by subsidiaries in the United States, Canada,
Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Italy, the United Kingdom,
Brazil and Australia. Hubbell also participates in joint
ventures in Taiwan and
76
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Hong Kong, and maintains sales offices in Singapore, the
Peoples Republic of China, Mexico, Hong Kong, South Korea
and the Middle East.
The Companys businesses are divided into three operating
segments: Electrical, Power, and Industrial Technology.
Information regarding operating segments has been presented as
required by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. At
December 31, 2006, the operating segments were comprised as
follows:
The Electrical segment is comprised of businesses that primarily
sell through distributors, lighting showrooms, home centers, and
telephone and telecommunication companies, and represents stock
and custom products including standard and special application
wiring device products, lighting fixtures and controls,
fittings, switches and outlet boxes, enclosures, wire management
products and voice and data signal processing components. The
products are typically used in and around industrial, commercial
and institutional facilities by electrical contractors,
maintenance personnel, electricians, and telecommunication
companies. Certain lighting fixtures, wiring devices and
electrical products also have residential application.
The Power segment consists of businesses that design and
manufacture a wide variety of construction, switching and
protection products, hot line tools, grounding equipment, cover
ups, fittings and fasteners, cable accessories, insulators,
arresters, cutouts, sectionalizers, connectors and compression
tools for the building and maintenance of overhead and
underground power and telephone lines, as well as applications
in the industrial, construction and pipeline industries.
The Industrial Technology segment consists of businesses that
design and manufacture test and measurement equipment, high
voltage power supplies and variable transformers, industrial
controls including motor speed controls, pendant-type
push-button stations, overhead crane controls, control and
pressure switches, DC devices, Gleason
Reel®
electric cable and hose reels, and specialized communications
systems such as intra-facility communications systems, telephone
systems, and land mobile radio peripherals. Products are sold
primarily to steel mills, industrial complexes, oil, gas and
petro-chemical industries, seaports, transportation authorities,
the security industry (malls and colleges), and cable and
electronic equipment manufacturers.
Financial
Information
Financial information by industry segment and geographic area
for the three years ended December 31, 2006, is summarized
below (in millions). When reading the data the following items
should be noted:
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales comprise sales to unaffiliated customers
inter-segment and inter-area sales are not significant.
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income consists of net sales less operating
expenses, including total corporate expenses, which are
generally allocated to each segment on the basis of the
segments percentage of consolidated net sales. Stock-based
compensation, interest expense and investment income and other
expense, net have not been allocated to segments.
|
|
|
|
General corporate assets not allocated to segments are
principally cash, prepaid pensions, investments and deferred
taxes.
|
77
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Industry
Segment Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$
|
1,631.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,496.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,476.8
|
|
Power
|
|
|
573.7
|
|
|
|
455.6
|
|
|
|
386.2
|
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
209.4
|
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
|
|
130.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,414.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$
|
140.2
|
|
|
$
|
153.6
|
|
|
$
|
173.4
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Electrical
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
|
|
142.7
|
|
|
|
156.7
|
|
Power
|
|
|
78.6
|
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unusual item
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
233.9
|
|
|
|
226.8
|
|
|
|
212.6
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
Investment and other income, net
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
221.5
|
|
|
$
|
215.7
|
|
|
$
|
197.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$
|
924.4
|
|
|
$
|
815.8
|
|
|
$
|
810.2
|
|
Power
|
|
|
478.5
|
|
|
|
322.2
|
|
|
|
279.4
|
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
178.8
|
|
|
|
124.2
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
169.8
|
|
|
|
404.8
|
|
|
|
471.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,751.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,656.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$
|
56.3
|
|
|
$
|
47.7
|
|
|
$
|
28.9
|
|
Power
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
General Corporate
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
86.8
|
|
|
$
|
73.4
|
|
|
$
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
|
$
|
36.0
|
|
|
$
|
35.5
|
|
Power
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Industrial Technology
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
55.4
|
|
|
$
|
50.4
|
|
|
$
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic
Area Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,109.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,866.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,787.1
|
|
International
|
|
|
305.1
|
|
|
|
238.4
|
|
|
|
205.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,414.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,104.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,993.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
207.4
|
|
|
$
|
203.3
|
|
|
$
|
193.6
|
|
Special charges, net
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
233.9
|
|
|
$
|
226.8
|
|
|
$
|
212.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment,
net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
269.9
|
|
|
$
|
222.5
|
|
|
$
|
219.8
|
|
International
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
318.5
|
|
|
$
|
267.8
|
|
|
$
|
261.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a geographic basis, the Company defines
international as operations based outside of the
United States and its possessions. Sales of international units
were 13%, 11% and 10% of total sales in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, with Canadian and United Kingdom markets
representing approximately 70% collectively of the 2006 total.
Long-lived assets of international subsidiaries were 15% of the
consolidated total in 2006, 17% in 2005, and 16% in 2004, with
the Canadian and United Kingdom markets representing
approximately 11% and 19%, respectively, of the 2006 total.
Export sales directly to customers or through electric
wholesalers from United States operations were
$131.2 million in 2006, $120.6 million in 2005 and
$99.6 million in 2004.
Note 21
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The table below sets forth summarized quarterly financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in
millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
573.0
|
|
|
$
|
603.2
|
|
|
$
|
649.0
|
|
|
$
|
589.0
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
158.5
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
165.7
|
|
|
$
|
180.9
|
|
|
$
|
151.6
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
39.7
|
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
41.6
|
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
29.2
|
(1)(2)(3)
|
Earnings Per Share
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
Earnings Per Share
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
487.6
|
|
|
$
|
520.5
|
|
|
$
|
561.1
|
|
|
$
|
535.7
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
136.7
|
|
|
$
|
143.1
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
164.2
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
151.0
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
28.8
|
(4)(5)
|
|
$
|
35.7
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
52.1
|
(4)(6)
|
Earnings Per Share
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
Earnings Per Share
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
79
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2006, Net
Income included $1.7 million, $1.4 million,
$0.7 million and $3.7 million of pretax special
charges, respectively. These charges relate to the integration
of the Companys lighting operations in the Electrical
segment. Included in the amounts above are inventory write-down
costs which are recorded in Cost of goods sold for the first
quarter of 2006 of $0.2 million, thereby reducing Gross
Profit on a pretax basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Net Income in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of
2006 included pretax costs of $2.7 million,
$2.7 million, $2.8 million and $3.6 million,
respectively, related to the Companys adoption of SFAS
No. 123R. |
|
(3) |
|
Net Income in the fourth quarter of 2006 includes a tax benefit
of $1.9 million which reflects the full year benefit
associated with the reinstatement of the Federal research and
development tax credit. |
|
(4) |
|
In the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2005, Net
Income included $1.9 million, $2.7 million,
$1.2 million and $5.1 million of pretax special
charges, respectively. These charges relate to both the
integration of the Companys lighting operations and other
consolidation actions within the Electrical segment. Included in
the amounts above are inventory write-down costs which are
recorded in Cost of goods sold and for the second and third
quarters of 2005 were $0.5 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, thereby reducing Gross Profit on a pretax basis. |
|
(5) |
|
Net Income in the first quarter of 2005 included a pretax charge
of $4.6 million related to transactional expenses in
support of the Companys strategic growth initiatives. |
|
(6) |
|
Net Income in the fourth quarter of 2005 included an income tax
benefit of $10.8 million related to the completion of IRS
examinations for years through 2003 and a $4.9 million
pretax gain on sale of a building in the Electrical segment. |
Note 22
Guarantees
The Company accrues for costs associated with guarantees when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
can be reasonably estimated. The most likely cost to be incurred
is accrued based on an evaluation of currently available facts,
and where no amount within a range of estimates is more likely,
the minimum is accrued.
The Company records a liability equal to the fair value of
guarantees in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,
(FIN 45). As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair
value and maximum potential payment related to the
Companys guarantees were not material. The Company may
enter into various hedging instruments which are subject to
disclosure in accordance with FIN 45. As of
December 31, 2006 the Company had three individual forward
exchange contracts outstanding each for the purchase of
$1.0 million U.S. dollars which expire ratably each
month through March 2007. These contracts were entered into in
order to hedge the exposure to fluctuating rates of exchange on
anticipated inventory purchases. These contracts have been
designated as cash flow hedges in accordance with
SFAS No. 133, as amended.
The Company offers a product warranty which covers defects on
most of its products. These warranties primarily apply to
products that are properly used for their intended purpose,
installed correctly, and properly maintained. The Company
generally accrues estimated warranty costs at the time of sale.
Estimated warranty expenses are based upon historical
information such as past experience, product failure rates, or
the number of units repaired or replaced. Adjustments are made
to the product warranty accrual as claims are incurred or as
historical experience indicates. The product warranty accrual is
reviewed for reasonableness on a quarterly basis and is adjusted
as additional information regarding expected warranty costs
become known. Changes in the accrual for product warranties in
2006 are set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
Current year provision
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management
necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and
benefits of such controls and procedures which, by their nature,
can provide only reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements.
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e),
as of the end of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K.
Based upon that evaluation, each of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely
alerting them to material information (including from
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in Exchange
Act reports.
Changes in Internal Controls In October of 2006, the
Company implemented another phase of a multi-year program to
implement a fully integrated suite of SAP application software.
The implementation has involved changes to certain internal
controls over financial reporting. The Company has reviewed each
system as it is being implemented and the controls affected by
the new systems and made appropriate changes to affected
internal controls as necessary. These controls were included in
the Companys assessment of the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which is included under
Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting in the Report of
Management within this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant(1)
|
The Companys Chief Executive Officer made the annual
certification required by Section 303A.12 of the NYSE
Company Manual on May 5, 2006. The Company has filed with
the SEC as exhibits to this
Form 10-K
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certifications of its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer relating to
the quality of its public disclosure.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain of the information required by this item regarding
executive officers is included in Part I, Item 4 of
this
Form 10-K
and the remaining required information is incorporated by
reference to the definitive proxy statement for the
Companys annual meeting of shareholders scheduled to be
held on May 7, 2007. |
81
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters(3)
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2006 with respect to the Companys common stock that may be
issued under the Companys equity compensation plans (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Available for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Under Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column A)
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved
by Shareholders(a)
|
|
|
4,640
|
(c)(e)
|
|
$
|
39.74
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
(c)(e)
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not
Requiring Shareholder Approval(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,640
|
|
|
$
|
39.74
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Companys (a) Stock Option Plan for Key Employees,
and (b) 2005 Incentive Award Plan. |
|
(b) |
|
The Companys Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors. |
|
(c) |
|
Class B Common Stock |
|
(d) |
|
Class A Common Stock |
|
(e) |
|
Excluded from the amounts are a total of 974,443 SARs which have
exercise prices above the market price of the Companys
Class B Common Stock at December 31, 2006 and,
therefore, could not be converted into shares. |
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions(2)
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services(2)
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the definitive proxy statement for the
Companys annual meeting of shareholders scheduled to be
held on May 7, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
The remaining information required by this item is incorporated
by reference to the definitive proxy statement for the
Companys annual meeting of shareholders scheduled to be
held on May 7, 2007. |
82
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
|
1.
|
Financial
Statements and Schedule
|
Financial statements and schedule listed in the Index to
Financial Statements and Schedule are filed as part of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
3a
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as amended and restated as of September 23,
2003. (1) Exhibit 3a of the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter (ended September 30), 2003, and filed
on November 10, 2003, is incorporated by reference; and (2)
Exhibit 1 of the registrants reports on
Form 8-A
and 8-K,
both dated and filed on December 17, 1998, are incorporated
by reference.
|
3b
|
|
By-Laws, Hubbell Incorporated, as
amended on June 4, 2003. Exhibit 3b of the
registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30, 2003), 2003, and
filed August 12, 2003, is incorporated by reference.
|
3c
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of
December 9, 1998, between Hubbell Incorporated and
ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C. as Rights Agent is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the
registrants Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
and
Form 8-K,
both dated and filed on December 17, 1998.
Exhibit 3(c), being an Amendment to Rights Agreement, of
the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter (ended September 30), 1999, and filed
on November 12, 1999, is incorporated by reference.
|
4a
|
|
Instruments with respect to the
1996 issue of long-term debt have not been filed as exhibits to
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as the authorized principal amount on such issue does not exceed
10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis; registrant agrees to furnish a copy of
each such instruments to the Commission upon request.
|
4b
|
|
Senior Indenture, dated as of
September 15, 1995, between Hubbell Incorporated and
JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank
and Chemical Bank), as trustee. Exhibit 4a of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-4
filed June 18, 2002, is incorporated by reference.
|
4c
|
|
Specimen Certificate of
6.375% Notes due 2012. Exhibit 4b of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-4
filed June 18, 2002, is incorporated by reference.
|
4d
|
|
Specimen Certificate of registered
6.37% Notes due 2010. Exhibit 4c of the registrants
registration statement on
Form S-4
filed June 18, 2002, is incorporated by reference.
|
4e
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of May 15, 2002, among Hubbell Incorporated and
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., BNY Capital Markets, Inc.,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., First Union Securities, Inc.,
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Salomon Smith
Barney Inc. as the Initial Purchasers. Exhibit 4d of the
registrants registration statement on
Form S-4
filed June 18, 2002, is incorporated by reference.
|
10a
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective
June 7, 2001. Exhibit 10a of the registrants
report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30), 2001, filed
August 9, 2001, is incorporated by reference.
|
10b(1)
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Stock Option
Plan for Key Employees, as amended and restated effective
May 5, 2003. (i) Exhibit 10b(1) of the
registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30), 2003, filed
August 12, 2003, is incorporated by reference;
(ii) Amendment, dated June 9, 2004, filed as Exhibit
10ee of the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30), 2004, filed
August 5, 2004, is incorporated by reference.
|
10b(2)
|
|
Amendment, dated
September 21, 2006, to the Hubbell Incorporated Stock
Option Plan for Key Employees. Exhibit 10.1 of the
registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter (ended September 30) 2006, filed
on November 7, 2006 is incorporated by reference.
|
83
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10bb
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 20, 2004, by and among Hubbell Incorporated,
JPMorgan Chase bank as administrative agent and lender, other
Lenders party thereto from time to time, Citibank, N.A., Fleet
National Bank and Wachovia Bank, National Association as
Syndication Agents, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
Arranger and Bookrunner. Exhibit 99.1 of the
registrants report on
Form 8-K,
filed October 21, 2004, is incorporated by reference.
|
10c
|
|
Description of the Hubbell
Incorporated, Post Retirement Death Benefit Plan for
Participants in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as
amended effective May 1, 1993. Exhibit 10c of the
registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30), 1993, filed on
August 12, 1993, is incorporated by reference.
|
10f
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors, as amended and restated
effective December 3, 2002. Exhibit 4(b) of the
registrants
Form S-8
Registration Statement, filed December 19, 2002, is
incorporated by reference.
|
10h
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Key Man
Supplemental Medical Insurance, as amended and restated
effective December 9, 1986. Exhibit 10h of the
registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 1987, filed on March 25, 1988, is incorporated
by reference.
|
10i
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Retirement
Plan for Directors, as amended and restated effective
December 3, 2002. Exhibit 10i of the registrants
report on
Form 10-K
for the year 2002, filed March 24, 2003, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10o
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Policy for
Providing Severance Payments to Key Managers, as amended and
restated effective September 9, 1993. Exhibit 10o of
the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter (ended September 30), 1993, filed on
November 10, 1993, is incorporated by reference.
|
10p
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Senior
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1,
1996. Exhibit C of the registrants proxy statement,
dated March 22, 1996 and filed on March 27, 1996, is
incorporated by reference.
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Continuity
Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2005, between Hubbell
Incorporated and Timothy H. Powers. Exhibit 10.1 of the
registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.2
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
March 14, 2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and Gregory F.
Covino. Exhibit 10.2 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.3
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
March 14, 2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and Scott H.
Muse. Exhibit 10.3 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.4
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
March 14, 2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and Thomas P.
Smith. Exhibit 10.4 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10u
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and Richard
W. Davies. Exhibit 10u of the registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 1999, filed March 27, 2000, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.5
|
|
Amendment, dated as of
March 14, 2005, to Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and Richard
W. Davies. Exhibit 10.5 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10v
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and James
H. Biggart. Exhibit 10v of the registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 1999, filed March 27, 2000, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.7
|
|
Amendment, dated as of
March 14, 2005, to Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and James
H. Biggart. Exhibit 10.7 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K,
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10w
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Top Hat
Restoration Plan, as amended effective June 6, 2002.
Exhibit 10w of the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
for the second quarter (ended June 30), filed
August 12, 2002, is incorporated by reference.
|
84
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
10x
|
|
Termination Agreement and General
Release, dated as of October 21, 2001, between Hubbell
Incorporated and Harry B. Rowell, Jr., Exhibit 10x of
the registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 2001, filed March 19, 2002, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10y
|
|
The retirement arrangement with G.
Jackson Ratcliffe is incorporated by reference to the
registrants proxy Statements:(i), dated March 27,
2002 as set forth under the heading Employment
Agreements/Retirement Arrangements, (ii) dated
March 15, 2004 as set forth under the heading Matters
Relating to Directors and Shareholders, and (iii) and
dated as of March 16, 2005 as set forth under the heading
Matters Relating to Directors and Shareholders.
|
10z
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated Incentive
Compensation Plan, adopted effective January 1, 2002.
Exhibit 10z of the registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 2001, filed on March 19, 2002, is incorporated
by reference.
|
10aa
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and W.
Robert Murphy. Exhibit 10aa of the registrants report
on
Form 10-K
for the year 2002, filed March 24, 2003, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment, dated as of
March 14, 2005, to Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and W.
Robert Murphy. Exhibit 10.6 of the registrants report
on
Form 8-K
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10cc
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and Gary N.
Amato. Exhibit 10cc of the registrants report on
Form 10-K
for the year 2002, filed March 24, 2003, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.8
|
|
Amendment, dated as of
March 14, 2005, to Continuity Agreement, dated as of
December 27, 1999, between Hubbell Incorporated and Gary N.
Amato. Exhibit 10.8 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.9
|
|
Grantor Trust for Senior
Management Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 14,
2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee. Exhibit 10.9 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.10
|
|
Grantor Trust for Non-Employee
Director Plans Trust Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2005,
between Hubbell Incorporated and The Bank of New York.
Exhibit 10.10 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K
dated and filed March 15, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.ee
|
|
Hubbell Incorporated 2005
Incentive Award Plan. Exhibit B of the registrants
proxy statement, dated as of March 16, 2005, is
incorporated by reference.
|
10.ee(1)
|
|
Amendment, dated
September 21, 2006, to the Hubbell Incorporated 2005
Incentive Award Plan. Exhibit 10.2 of the registrants
report on
Form 10-Q
for the third quarter (ended September 30) 2006, filed
on November 7, 2006 is incorporated by reference.
|
10.ff
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated September
2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and David G. Nord.
Exhibit 99.1 of the registrants report on
Form 8-K
dated and filed September 6, 2005, is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.gg
|
|
Continuity Agreement, dated as of
September 19, 2005, between Hubbell Incorporated and David
G. Nord. Exhibit 10.12 of the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
dated and filed November 4, 2005 is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.hh
|
|
Restricted Award Agreement, dated
September 19, 2005 between Hubbell Incorporated and David
G. Nord. Exhibit 10.13 of the registrants report on
Form 10-Q
dated and filed November 4, 2005 is incorporated by
reference.
|
10.ii
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 20, 2004 as Amended and Restated as of
December 12, 2005 Among Hubbell Incorporated, Hubbell
Cayman Limited, The Lenders Party hereto, Citibank, N.A., Bank
of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent filed as
Exhibit 10.ii of the registrants report on
Form 10-K dated and filed March 8, 2006 is
incorporated by reference.
|
21*
|
|
Listing of significant
subsidiaries.
|
23*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP.
|
85
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b) (31) of
Regulation S-K,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b) (31) of
Regulation S-K,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
This exhibit constitutes a management contract, compensatory
plan, or arrangement
|
|
*
|
Filed hereunder
|
Hubbell Incorporated
David G. Nord
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Gregory F. Covino
Vice President, Controller
(and Chief Accounting Officer)
Date: February 27, 2007
86
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ T.
H. Powers
T.
H. Powers
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ D.
G. Nord
D.
G. Nord
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ E.
R. Brooks
E.
R. Brooks
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ G.
W. Edwards,
Jr
G.
W. Edwards, Jr
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ A.
J. Guzzi
A.
J. Guzzi
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ J.
S. Hoffman
J.
S. Hoffman
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ A.
Mcnally IV
A.
McNally IV
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ D.
J. Meyer
D.
J. Meyer
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ G.
J.
Ratcliffe
G.
J. Ratcliffe
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ R.
J. Swift
R.
J. Swift
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ D.
S. Van
Riper
D.
S. Van Riper
|
|
Director
|
|
2/27/07
|
87
Schedule II
HUBBELL
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2005 AND 2006
Reserves deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which
they apply (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Reversals)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Acquisitions/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Disposition
|
|
|
|
|
|
at End
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
of Businesses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Allowances for doubtful accounts
receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
Year 2005
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
Year 2006
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
Allowance for credit memos and
returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
Year 2005
|
|
$
|
16.3
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
Year 2006
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.8
|
|
Allowances for excess/obsolete
inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
*
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
Year 2005
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
*
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
Year 2006
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
*
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
Valuation allowance on deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year 2004
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
Year 2005
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Year 2006
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes the cost of product line discontinuances of
$0.2 million, $0.7 million and $1.3 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
88