FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended:
March 28, 2009
|
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange of which registered
|
Common Stock, $0.50 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Capital Market
|
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on
September 26, 2008 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $45 million. The market value calculation
was determined using the closing sale price of the
registrants Common Stock on September 26, 2008, as
reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
The number of shares of Common Stock of the registrant
outstanding as of June 19, 2009 was 7,386,970.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III, Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14 of this report, to the extent not set forth
herein, is incorporated by reference from the registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on September 15, 2009, which
definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking
statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning
expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat, we, us, or
our). Words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to forecast, including, among other things, the risks
and uncertainties identified by us below under Risk
Factors in Item IA of Part I of this report.
Therefore, our actual results and outcomes may materially differ
from those expressed or forecast in any such forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Transcat is a leading global distributor of professional grade
test and measurement instruments and accredited provider of
calibration, parts inspection, production model engineering and
repair services. We are primarily focused on providing our
products and services to the following markets:
|
|
|
|
|
The Pharmaceutical industry and FDA-regulated (such as food and
beverage) businesses;
|
|
|
|
Industrial manufacturing companies;
|
|
|
|
The energy industry and power, natural gas and water utility
companies;
|
|
|
|
The chemical process industry; and
|
|
|
|
Other industries which require accuracy in their processes and
confirmation of the capabilities of their equipment.
|
We conduct our business through two segments: distribution
products (distribution products or
Product) and calibration services (calibration
services or Service).
Through our distribution products segment, we market and
distribute national and proprietary brand instruments to
approximately 13,600 global customers. Our product catalog
(Master Catalog) offers access to more than 25,000
test and measurement instruments, including calibrators,
insulation testers, multimeters, pressure and temperature
devices, oscilloscopes, recorders and related accessories. These
products are available from over 300 of the industrys
leading manufacturers including Fluke, GE, Emerson, and Hart
Scientific. In addition, we are the exclusive worldwide
distributor for Transmation and Altek products. The majority of
the instrumentation we sell requires expert calibration service
to ensure that it maintains the most precise measurements.
Through our accredited calibration services segment, we offer
precise, reliable, fast calibration, parts inspection, product
model engineering and repair services. As of our fiscal year
ended March 28, 2009, (fiscal year 2009), we
operated twelve calibration laboratories (Calibration
Centers of Excellence) strategically located across the
United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada servicing approximately
9,300 customers. Each of our Calibration Centers of Excellence
is ISO-9001:2000 registered and our scope of accreditation to
ISO/IEC 17025 is believed to be one of the broadest in the
industry. Our accreditation meets many international levels of
quality, consistency and reliability. See Calibration
Services Segment Quality below in this
Item 1 for more information.
CalTrak®
is our proprietary documentation and asset management system
which is used to manage both the workflow at our Calibration
Centers of Excellence and our clients assets. With
CalTrak®,
we are able to
3
provide our customers with timely calibration service while
optimizing our own efficiencies. Additionally, CalTrak-Online
provides our customers direct access to calibration
certificates, calibration data, and access to other key
documents required in the calibration process.
CalTrak®
has been validated to U.S federal regulation 21CFR 820.75,
which is important to the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated
industries, where federal regulations can be particularly
stringent. See the section entitled Calibration Services
Segment
CalTrak®
below in this Item 1 for more information.
Our attention to quality goes beyond the products and services
we deliver. Our sales, customer service and support teams stand
ready to provide expert advice, application assistance and
technical support wherever and whenever our customers need it.
Since calibration is an intangible service, our customers rely
on us to uphold high standards and trust in the integrity of our
people and processes.
Among our customers, and representing 31% of our consolidated
revenue, are Fortune 500/Global 500 companies, including
Wyeth, Johnson & Johnson, DuPont, Exxon Mobil, Dow
Chemical, Nestle and Duke Energy. Transcat has focused on the
pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated industries, industrial
manufacturing, energy and utility, chemical process and other
industries since its founding in 1964. We are the leading
supplier of calibrators in the markets we serve. We believe our
customers do business with us because of our integrity,
commitment to quality service, our
CalTrak®
asset management system, and our broad range of product
offerings.
Transcat was incorporated in Ohio in 1964. We are headquartered
in Rochester, New York and employ more than 250 people. Our
executive offices are located at 35 Vantage Point Drive,
Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is
585-352-7777.
OUR
STRATEGY
Our strategy for growth is to expand both our distribution
products and calibration services segments by leveraging these
offerings to markets that value product breadth and
availability. Our target customers are those that rely on
accredited calibration services to maintain the integrity of
their processes
and/or
operate in regulated environments. Our strategic focus is to
serve a customer base that requires precise measurement
capability for their manufacturing and testing processes in
order to minimize risk, waste and defects. We do this by
targeting customers who value superior quality, service and
convenience associated with our multiple locations, broad
capabilities and breadth of choice. We believe our combined
offerings, experience, and integrity create a unique and
compelling value proposition for our customers and prospects
that is built upon trust and technical competence.
We strive to differentiate ourselves and build barriers to
competitive entry by offering the best products, delivering high
quality through the trusted integrity of our calibration and
repair services, and integrating those products and services to
benefit our customers operations and lower their costs.
ACQUISITIONS
On August 14, 2008, we acquired Westcon, Inc.
(Westcon), a test and measurement instruments
distributor and calibration services provider based in Portland,
Oregon.
Prior to the acquisition, Westcon distributed over 60 product
lines of high quality test and measurement instruments and
offered a full range of calibration services to approximately
1,800 customers, primarily located in the western United States.
Westcon has been providing accredited calibration and repair
services in a variety of disciplines including electrical,
temperature, pressure and torque to its customers for over
25 years and meets ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation standards.
Our acquisition of Westcon established a west coast distribution
center that enables us to provide faster service to a broader
base of potential customers while adding a full-service
calibration operation that geographically complements and
expands our nationwide network of laboratories. Westcon has and
will continue to serve the wind energy industry, which we see as
a high-growth target market that fits well within our energy
market focus.
4
With 30 employees, Westcon had approximately
$9.6 million in revenue from both product sales and
calibration services for its fiscal year ended June 30,
2008. The aggregate purchase price was approximately
$6.9 million, which we paid in a combination of cash and
the issuance of Transcat common stock.
SEGMENTS
We service our customers through two business segments:
distribution products and calibration services. Note 8 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report presents
financial information for these segments. We serve approximately
18,000 customers, with no customer or controlled group of
customers accounting for 5% or more of our consolidated net
revenue for fiscal years 2007 through 2009. We are not dependent
on any single customer, the loss of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or
results of operations.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales
channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, our website, a
field sales organization, proactive outbound sales, and an
inbound call center. Our field, outbound and inbound sales teams
are each staffed with technically trained personnel. Our
domestic and international outbound sales organization covers
territories in North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa,
Asia, and the Middle East. Our calibration and repair services
are offered only in North America and Puerto Rico. We
concentrate on attracting new customers and also on
cross-selling to existing customers to increase our product
sales and service revenue. Our revenue from customers in the
following geographic areas during the periods indicated,
expressed as a percentage of total revenue, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other International
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Summary. Our customers use test and
measurement instruments to ensure that their processes, and
ultimately their end products, are within specification.
Utilization of such diagnostic instrumentation also allows for
continuous improvement processes to be in place, increasing the
accuracies of their measurements. The industrial distribution
products industry for test and measurement instrumentation, in
those geographic markets where we predominately operate, is
serviced by broad-based national distributors and niche or
specialty-focused organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house
inventory of
back-up test
and measurement instruments is cost prohibitive. As a result,
the distribution of test and measurement instrumentation has
traditionally been characterized by frequent, small quantity
orders combined with a need for rapid, reliable, and complete
order fulfillment. The decision to buy is generally made by
plant engineers, quality managers, or their purchasing
personnel. Products are generally obtained from more than one
distributor.
The majority of our products are not consumables, but are
purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Our
catalog and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant
presence in front of the customer to ensure we receive the order
when they are ready to purchase. As a result, we evaluate
revenue trends over a twelve-month rolling period as any
individual months or quarters revenue can be
impacted by numerous factors, many of which are unpredictable
and potentially non-recurring.
We believe that a distribution products customer chooses a
distributor based on a number of different criteria including
the timely delivery and accuracy of orders, consistent product
quality, the technical competence of the representative serving
them, value added services, as well as price. Value added
services include providing technical support to insure our
customer receives the right product for their specific need
through application knowledge and product compatibility. We also
provide calibration of product purchases, on-line procurement,
5
same day shipment of in-stock items, a variety of custom product
offerings and training programs. Because of the breadth of
products we offer and the services we provide, we are often a
one-stop shop for our customers who gain the
operational efficiency of dealing with just one distributor for
most or all of their test and measurement equipment needs.
Our distribution products segment accounted for 68% of our
consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2009. Within the
distribution products segment, our routine business is comprised
of customers who place orders to acquire or to replace specific
instruments, which average approximately $1,500 per order. Items
are regularly added to and deleted from our product lines on the
basis of customer demand, market research, recommendations of
suppliers, sales volumes and other factors.
Marketing and Sales. Through our
comprehensive Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, website,
e-newsletters,
and other direct sales and marketing programs, we offer our
customers a broad selection of highly recognized branded
products at competitive prices. The instruments typically range
in price from $250 to over $25,000.
During fiscal year 2009, we distributed approximately
1.1 million pieces of direct marketing materials including
catalogs, brochures, supplements and other promotional
materials, of which approximately 665,000 were distributed to
customer contacts and approximately 450,000 were distributed to
potential customer contacts. We also distributed approximately
250,000
e-newsletters
to our list of customers and prospects. Some of the key factors
that determine the number of catalogs and other direct marketing
materials received by each customer include new product
introductions, their market segments and the timing, frequency
and monetary value of past purchases.
The majority of our product sales are derived from direct mail
and on-line marketing. Our Master Catalog offers access to more
than 25,000 test and measurement products and is used by
customers, sales representatives and branch personnel to assist
customer product selection. During fiscal year 2009,
approximately 85,000 copies of our Master Catalog were produced
and distributed to existing and prospective customers in North
America and Puerto Rico. The Master Catalog provides standard
make/model and related information and is also available in an
electronic format upon request and on our website, transcat.com.
We use smaller catalog supplements that feature new products,
promotions, or specific product categories to target prospects
and acquire new customers. The catalog supplements are launched
at varying periods throughout the year. These publications were
mailed to approximately 1.1 million customers and targeted
prospects during fiscal year 2009.
Customers can also purchase products through our website,
transcat.com. Our website serves as a growing market channel for
our products and services and provides product availability,
detailed product information, advanced features such as product
search and compare capabilities, as well as downloadable product
specification sheets. We have optimized the websites
search engine, streamlined order entry and have the unique
ability to supplement an order with an accredited calibration.
Traffic to our website has grown more than 50% over the prior
fiscal year and represented 7% of our Product segment sales in
fiscal year 2009.
Competition. The distribution products
markets we serve are highly competitive. Competition for sales
in distribution products is quite fragmented and ranges from
large national distributors and manufacturers that sell directly
to customers to small local distributors. Key competitive
factors typically include customer service and support, quality,
turn around time, inventory availability, product brand and
price. To address our customers needs for technical
support and product application assistance, and to differentiate
ourselves from competitors, we employ a staff of highly-trained
technical application specialists. In order to maintain this
competitive advantage, technical training is an integral part of
developing our sales and application specialist staff.
Suppliers and Purchasing. We believe
that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and
enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and
measurement instruments. We frequently evaluate our purchase
requirements and suppliers offerings to obtain products at
the best possible cost. We obtain our products from more than
300 suppliers of brand name and private-labeled equipment. In
fiscal year 2009, our top 10 vendors accounted for approximately
70% of our aggregate business. Approximately 30% of our
6
product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke Electronics
Corporation (Fluke), which we believe to be
consistent with Flukes share of the markets we service.
We plan our product mix and inventory stock to best serve the
anticipated needs of our customers whose individual purchases
vary in size. We can usually ship to our customers our top
selling products the same day they are ordered. During fiscal
year 2009, approximately 90% of orders for our top selling
products were filled with inventory items already in stock.
Operations. Our distribution operations
take place within an approximate 37,000 square-foot
facility located in Rochester, New York and a
4,500 square-foot facility in Portland, Oregon. The
Rochester location also serves as our corporate headquarters;
houses our customer service, sales and administrative functions;
and has a calibration laboratory. We ship approximately 33,000
product orders annually. We expect to provide our customers in
the western region of the United States with enhanced levels of
service, greater availability and selection of products, quicker
delivery times, as well as potential cost savings, as we
integrate our Portland, Oregon facility into our distribution
system.
Distribution. We distribute our
products throughout North America and internationally from our
two distribution centers. We maintain appropriate inventory
levels in order to satisfy anticipated customer demand for
prompt delivery and complete order fulfillment of their product
needs. These inventory levels are managed on a daily basis with
the aid of our sophisticated purchasing and stock management
information system. Our automated laser bar code scanning
facilitates prompt and accurate order fulfillment and freight
manifesting.
In addition to our direct end-user customers, we also sell
products to resellers who then sell to end-users. Our sales to
resellers are typically at a lower gross margin than sales to
direct customers and therefore the percentage of reseller sales
to total revenue in any given period can have an impact on our
overall gross profit margin. During fiscal year 2009, 18% of our
product sales were to resellers compared with 14% in fiscal year
2008 and 16% in fiscal year 2007. We believe that these
resellers have access, through their existing relationships, to
end-user customers to whom we do not market directly.
Exclusivity Agreement with Fluke. We
have been the exclusive worldwide distributor of Altek and
Transmation branded products since fiscal year 2002. Annually,
in exchange for exclusive distribution rights, we committed to
purchase a minimum amount of Altek and Transmation products from
Fluke. Each year, we have exceeded this commitment. In calendar
year 2008, this commitment was $4.0 million. By its terms,
the most recent exclusivity agreement with Fluke expired on
December 31, 2008. Although the agreement has expired and
while we negotiate a new agreement with Fluke, we continue to be
the exclusive worldwide distributor of these products. We expect
the new agreement to be on terms similar to those of the
agreement that expired on December 31, 2008.
Backlog. Customer product orders
include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our
inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less
frequently, which we do not stock.
Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped
complete, orders awaiting credit approval and orders required to
be shipped at a future date.
At March 28, 2009, the value of our pending product
shipments was approximately $1.2 million, compared with
approximately $1.4 million and $1.8 million at
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. Our
pending product shipments and total product backorders increased
during the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 as a direct result
of our integration of Westcon onto our order entry system.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, pending product
shipments decreased 30%, when compared to the balance at the end
of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009. We attribute this to
decreased orders as a result of a decline in the general economy
as demand from existing customers weakened despite aggressive
pricing initiatives. The decline in pending product shipments
during the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008 (fiscal
year 2008) was primarily the result of $0.4 million
in previously pending shipments relating to a single order
placed in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
(fiscal year 2007). At the request of the customer,
this specific order was shipped over several months. During
fiscal year 2009, the month-end level of pending product
shipments varied between a low of $1.2 million and a high
of $1.9 million.
7
The following graph shows the quarter-end trend of pending
product shipments and backorders for fiscal years 2008 and 2009.
CALIBRATION
SERVICES SEGMENT
Summary. Calibration is the act of
comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of
known value and reporting the result in some rigorously defined
form. After the calibration has been completed, a decision is
made, again based on rigorously defined parameters, on what, if
anything, is to be done to the unit to conform to the required
standards or specifications. The decision may be to adjust,
optimize or repair a unit; limit the use, range or rating of a
unit; scrap the unit; or leave the unit as is. The purpose of
calibration is to significantly reduce the risk of product or
process failures caused by inaccurate measurements.
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of
measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any
one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities,
equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to address
all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration
capabilities. Our strategy, within our calibration services
segment, has been to focus our investments in the core
electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines.
We can address approximately 80% to 85% of the calibration
requests we receive with our in-house capabilities. For
customers calibration needs in less common and highly
technical disciplines, we have historically subcontracted to
third party vendors that can have unique or proprietary
capabilities. These vendor relationships have enabled us to
continue our pursuit of having the broadest calibration
offerings to these targeted markets.
Strategy. Our calibration services
segment provides periodic calibration and repair services for
our customers test and measurement instruments, parts
inspection services and production model engineering services.
We specifically target industries where quality calibrations are
a critical operational component and believe calibration
sourcing decisions are based on accreditation, reliability,
trust, customer service, turn-around time, location,
documentation, price and a one-source solution. Our success with
customers is based on the trust they have in the integrity of
our people and processes.
Transcats calibration strategy encompasses two methods to
manage a customers calibration and repair needs:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, we offer
an Integrated Calibration Services Solution that
provides a complete wrap-around service which includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program management;
|
|
|
Calibration;
|
|
|
Logistics; and
|
|
|
Consultation services.
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can
provide:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of primary standards;
|
|
|
Overflow capability either
on-site or
at one of our Calibration Centers of Excellence during periods
of high demand; and
|
|
|
Consultation and training services.
|
8
In either case, we strive to have the broadest accredited
calibration offering to our targeted markets which includes
certification of our technicians pursuant to the American
Society for Quality (ASQ) standards, complete
calibration management encompassing the entire metrology
function, and access to our service offerings. We believe our
calibration services are of the highest technical and quality
levels, with broad ranges of accreditation and registration. Our
quality systems are further detailed in the section entitled
Quality below.
CalTrak®. CalTrak®
and CalTrak-Online are our proprietary metrology management
systems that provide a comprehensive calibration quality
program. Many of our customers have unique calibration service
requirements to which we have tailored specific services.
CalTrak-Online allows our customers to track calibration cycles
via the Internet and provides the customer with a safe and
secure off-site archive of calibration records that can be
accessed 24 hours a day. Access to records data is managed
through our secure password protected website. Calibration
assets are tracked with records that are automatically
cross-referenced to the equipment that was used to calibrate.
CalTrak®
has also been validated to meet the most stringent requirements
within the industry.
We perform over 140,000 in-house calibrations annually. These
are performed at our twelve Calibration Centers of Excellence or
at the customers location. During fiscal year 2009,
services completed by our Calibration Centers of Excellence
represented 80% of our calibration services segment revenue
while approximately 17% of the revenue was derived from
calibration services that were subcontracted to third party
vendors. Our calibration services segment accounted for 32% of
our total consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2009.
Marketing and Sales. Calibration
improves an operations maximum productivity and efficiency
by assuring accurate, reliable instruments and processes.
Through our calibration services segment, we perform periodic
calibrations on new and used instruments as well as repair
services for our customers. All of our Calibration Centers of
Excellence provide accredited calibration of common measurement
parameters.
We have sales teams that seek to acquire new customers in our
targeted markets and account management teams to ensure
continued relationships with existing customers. In addition, we
employ our Master Catalog, supplements, mailings, journal
advertising, trade shows, and the Internet to market our
calibration services to customers and prospective customers with
a strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including
pharmaceutical, FDA-regulated, energy and utilities, and
chemical processing. We also target industrial manufacturing and
other industries that appreciate the value of quality
calibrations. Our quality process and standards are designed to
meet the needs of companies that must address regulatory
requirements
and/or have
a strong commitment to quality and a comprehensive calibration
program.
The approximate percentage of our calibration services business
by industry segment for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical/FDA-Regulated
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Industrial Manufacturing
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Chemical Manufacturing
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Energy/Utilities
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The calibration outsource
industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies
ranging from internationally recognized and accredited
corporations, such as Transcat, to non-accredited, sole
proprietors as well as companies that perform their own
calibrations in-house, resulting in a tremendous range of
service levels and capabilities. A large percentage of
calibration companies are small businesses that provide only
basic measurements and service markets in which quality
requirements may not be as demanding as the markets that we
strategically target. Very few of these companies are structured
to compete on the same scale and level of quality as us. There
are also several companies with whom we compete who have
national
9
or regional operations. Certain of these competitors may have
greater resources than us and some of them have accreditations
that are similar to ours. We differentiate ourselves from our
competitors by demonstrating our commitment to quality and by
having a wide range of capabilities that are tailored to the
markets we serve. Customers see the value in using our unique
CalTrak-Online program to monitor their instruments
status. We are fundamentally different from most of our
competitors because we have the ability to bundle product,
calibration and repair as a single source for our customers.
Quality. The accreditation process is
the only system currently in existence that assures measurement
competence. Each of our laboratories is audited and reviewed by
external accreditation bodies proficient in the technical
aspects of the chemistry and physics that underlie metrology,
ensuring that measurements are properly made. Accreditation also
requires that all standards used for accredited measurements
have a fully documented path, known as the traceability chain,
either directly or through other accredited laboratories, back
to the national or international standard for that measurement
parameter. This ensures that our measurement process is
consistent with the global metrology network that is designed to
standardize measurements worldwide.
To ensure the quality and consistency of our calibrations for
our customers, we have sought and achieved several international
levels of quality and accreditation. Our calibration
laboratories are ISO 9001:2000 registered through
Underwriters Laboratories, which itself has international
oversight from the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board. We
believe our scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 to be the
broadest for the industries we serve. The accreditation process
also ensures that our calibrations are traceable to the National
Institute of Standards and Technology or the National Research
Council (these are the National Measurement Institutes for the
United States and Canada, respectively), or to other national or
international standards bodies, or to measurable conditions
created in our laboratory, or accepted fundamental
and/or
natural physical constants, ratio type of calibration, or by
comparison to consensus standards. Our laboratories are
accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 using two
of the four accrediting bodies (ABs) in the
United States that are signatories to the International
Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). These
two ABs are: American Association for Laboratory
Accreditation and National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program. These ABs provide an objective, third party,
internationally accepted evaluation of the quality, consistency,
and competency of our calibration processes.
The importance of this international oversight to our customers
is the assurance that our documents will be accepted worldwide,
removing one of the barriers to trade that they may experience
if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration service provider.
10
To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our
target markets, our ISO-17025 accreditations extend across many
technical disciplines. The following table represents our
capabilities for each of our Calibration Centers of Excellence
as of March 28, 2009 (A=Accredited; N=Non-accredited):
WORKING-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
Dimensional Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts
|
|
|
Current/
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inspection
|
|
|
Alternating
|
|
Frequency/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Geometric
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Ultra
|
|
Radio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensioning
|
|
|
- Low
|
|
- High
|
|
Frequency/
|
|
Luminance/
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Tolerance/
|
|
|
Frequency
|
|
Frequency
|
|
Microwave
|
|
Illuminance
|
|
Length
|
|
Optics
|
|
3-D Metrology)
|
|
Anaheim
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Portland
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
San Juan
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
Particle
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
Relative
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure,
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Counters
|
|
Force
|
|
Analysis
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Weight
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Anaheim
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Dayton
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Portland
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines (continued)
|
|
Life Sciences Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Minute,
|
|
Vibration,
|
|
|
|
Chemical/
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
|
|
Temperature
|
|
Speed
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
Biomedical
|
|
Biological
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
Anaheim
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
11
REFERENCE-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure/
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional
|
|
Electrical
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Mass
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Temperature
|
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cherry Hill
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Portland
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CUSTOMER
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Our breadth of distribution products and calibration services
along with our strong commitment to customer sales, service and
support enable us to satisfy our customer needs through
convenient selection and ordering; rapid, accurate, and complete
order fulfillment; and on-time delivery.
Key elements of our customer service approach are our
technically-trained field sales team, outbound sales team,
account management team, inbound sales and customer service
organization. Most customer orders are placed through our
customer service organization which often provides technical
assistance to our customers to facilitate the purchasing
decision. To ensure the quality of service provided, we
frequently monitor our customer service through customer
surveys, interpersonal communication, and daily statistical
reports.
Customers may place orders via:
|
|
|
Mail to Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY
14624;
|
|
Fax at
1-800-395-0543;
|
|
Telephone at
1-800-828-1470;
|
|
Email at sales@transcat.com; or
|
|
Our website at transcat.com.
|
INFORMATION
REGARDING EXPORT SALES
Approximately 15% of our net revenue in fiscal year 2009
resulted from sales to customers outside the United States,
compared with 16% and 17% in fiscal years 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Of those sales in fiscal year 2009, 57% were
denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining 43% were in
Canadian dollars. Our revenue is subject to the customary risks
of operating in an international environment, including the
potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions,
tariff and other tax increases, fluctuations in exchange rates
and unstable political situations, any one or more of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash
flows, balance sheet or results of operations. See the section
entitled Foreign Currency in Item 7A of
Part II of this report for further details.
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
We utilize a basic software platform, Application Plus, to
manage our business and operations segments. We also utilize a
turnkey enterprise software solution. This software includes a
suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business
functions, including customer service, warehouse management,
inventory management, financial management, customer management,
and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature
business package and has been subject to more than 20 years
of refinement.
SEASONALITY
We believe that our business has certain historical seasonal
factors. Our fiscal second quarter is generally weaker and our
fiscal fourth quarter has historically been stronger due to
typical industrial operating cycles.
12
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment will
not have any material effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2009, we had 281 employees,
compared with 247 and 228 employees at the end of fiscal
years 2008 and 2007, respectively.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers and certain key employees as of
March 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
John J. Zimmer
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
John A. De Voldre
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
Jay F. Woychick
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
John P. Hennessy
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Vice President of Sales
|
Rainer Stellrecht
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President of Laboratory Operations
|
Lori L. Drescher
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President of Business Process Improvement and Training
|
David D. Goodhead
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Vice President of Wind Energy
|
Derek C. Hurlburt
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Corporate Controller
|
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, therefore, we
file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information
with the SEC. Such reports may be read and copied at the Public
Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains a website
(sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy statements and other
information for registrants that file electronically.
We maintain an internet website at transcat.com. On our website,
we make available, free of charge, documents we file with the
SEC, including our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to
the SEC. We make this information available as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
materials with, or furnish such information to, the SEC. Our SEC
reports can be accessed in the investor relations section of our
website. The other information found on our website is not part
of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
We also post on our website our board of directors
committee charters (audit committee, compensation committee and
corporate governance and nominating committee), and Code of
Ethics. Copies of such charters are available in print at no
charge to any shareholder who makes a request. Such requests
should be made to our corporate secretary at our corporate
headquarters.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other
information included in this report. The risks and uncertainties
described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only
ones facing our business. If any of the following risks were to
actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations
13
would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our
common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
General Economic Conditions May Have A Material Adverse
Effect On Our Operating Results, Financial Condition, Or Our
Ability To Meet Our Commitments. The Recent Global Financial
Crisis Has Had And May Continue To Have An Impact On Our
Business And Financial Condition In Ways That We Currently
Cannot Predict Including The Impact On Our Customers
Activity Levels And Spending For Our Products And
Services. The test and measurement instrument
distribution industry is affected by changes in economic
conditions, which are outside our control. Economic slowdowns,
adverse economic conditions or cyclical trends in certain
customer markets may have a material adverse effect on our
operating results, financial condition, or our ability to meet
our commitments.
Based on a number of economic indicators, growth in global
economic activity has slowed substantially. At the present time,
the likelihood, extent and timing of a recovery in the global
economy is uncertain. The continued credit crisis and related
turmoil in the global financial markets has had and may continue
to have an impact on our business and our financial condition.
The global financial crisis has impacted and could continue to
impact our liquidity. Customer collections are our primary
source of cash. While we believe we have a well diversified
customer base and no concentration of credit risk with any
single customer, we have a number of large customers that have
been and could continue to be affected by the slowed economy.
While we believe we have a strong customer base and have
experienced strong collections in the past, if the current
market conditions continue to deteriorate we may experience
increased unpredictability in our customer base, including
reductions in their commitments to us, which could also have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity. Deteriorating market
and liquidity conditions may also give rise to issues which may
impact our lenders ability to hold its debt commitments to
us to their full term. Accordingly, while this would be highly
unusual, these lenders of committed and drawn facilities could
attempt to call this debt which would have a material adverse
effect on our liquidity, even though no call provisions exist
without being in default.
We Depend On Manufacturers To Supply Our Inventory And
Rely On One Vendor Group To Supply A Significant Amount Of Our
Inventory Purchases. If They Fail To Provide Desired Products To
Us, Increase Prices, Or Fail To Timely Deliver Products, Our
Revenue and Gross Profit Could Suffer. A
significant amount of our inventory purchases are made from one
vendor, Fluke. Our reliance on this vendor leaves us vulnerable
to having an inadequate supply of required products, price
increases, late deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other
distributors in our industry, we occasionally experience
supplier shortages and are unable to purchase our desired volume
of products. If we are unable to enter into and maintain
satisfactory distribution arrangements with leading
manufacturers, if we are unable to maintain an adequate supply
of products, or if manufacturers do not regularly invest in,
introduce to us,
and/or make
new products available to us for distribution, our sales could
suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance
that particular products, or product lines, will be available to
us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer
demand. This is of particular significance to our business
because the products we sell are often only available from one
source. Any limits to product access could materially and
adversely affect our business.
Our Future Success May Be Affected By Future
Indebtedness. Under our revolving credit
facility, as of March 28, 2009, we owed $3.5 million
to our secured creditor. We may borrow additional funds in the
future to support our growth and working capital needs. We are
required to meet financial tests on a quarterly basis and comply
with other covenants customary in secured financings. Although
we believe that we will continue to be in compliance with such
covenants, if we do not remain in compliance with such
covenants, our lender may demand immediate repayment of amounts
outstanding. Changes in interest rates may have a significant
effect on our payment obligations and operating results.
Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from manufacturers of
our products to fund our inventory purchases. If our debt burden
increases to high levels, such manufacturers may restrict our
credit. Our cash requirements will depend on numerous factors,
including the rate of growth of our revenues, the timing and
levels of products purchased, payment terms, and credit limits
from manufacturers, the timing and level of our accounts
receivable collections and our ability to manage our business
profitably. Our ability to satisfy our existing obligations,
whether or not under our
14
secured credit facility, will depend upon our future operating
performance, which may be impacted by prevailing economic
conditions and financial, business, and other factors described
in this report, many of which are beyond our control.
If Existing Shareholders Sell Large Numbers Of Shares Of
Our Common Stock, Our Stock Price Could
Decline. The market price of our common
stock could decline if a large number of our shares are sold in
the public market by our existing shareholders or holders of
stock options or as a result of the perception that these sales
could occur.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May Continue To Be,
Volatile. The stock market, from time to
time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance
of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility,
and by our own performance, the following factors, among others,
may have a significant effect on the market price of our common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future
manufacturers of products we distribute;
|
|
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements
involving us or our industry;
|
|
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other
crises;
|
|
|
Sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market;
|
|
|
Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and
|
|
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
|
We Expect That Our Quarterly Results Of Operations Will
Fluctuate. Such Fluctuation Could Cause Our Stock Price To
Decline. A large portion of our expenses for
calibration services, including expenses for facilities,
equipment and personnel, are relatively fixed. Accordingly, if
revenues decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be
able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any
particular quarter. Our quarterly revenues and operating results
have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the
future. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet
the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our
stock price would likely decline. Some of the factors that could
cause our revenues and operating results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell
and/or
services we provide; and
|
|
|
Fluctuations in geographic conditions, including currency and
other economic conditions.
|
Changes In Accounting Standards, Legal Requirements And
The NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Standards, Or Our Ability To
Comply With Any Existing Requirements Or Standards, Could
Adversely Affect Our Operating
Results. Extensive reforms relating to public
company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics,
the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and oversight of the
accounting profession have been implemented over the past
several years and continue to evolve. Compliance with these
rules, regulations and standards that have resulted from such
reforms has increased our accounting and legal costs and has
required significant management time and attention. In the event
that additional rules, regulations or standards are implemented
or any of the existing rules, regulations or standards to which
we are subject undergoes additional material modification, we
could be forced to spend significant financial and management
resources to ensure our continued compliance, which could have
an adverse affect on our results of operations. In addition,
although we believe we are in full compliance with all such
existing rules, regulations and standards, should we be or
become unable to comply with any of such rules, regulations and
standards, as they presently exist or as they may exist in the
future, our results of operations could be adversely effected
and the market price of our common stock could decline.
The Distribution Products Industry Is Highly Competitive,
And We May Not Be Able To Compete
Successfully. We compete with numerous
companies, including several major manufacturers and
distributors. Some of our competitors have greater financial and
other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete
more successfully. Most of our products are available from
several sources and our customers tend to have relationships
with several distributors. Competitors could obtain exclusive
rights to market particular products, which we would then be
unable to market. Manufacturers could also increase their
efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass distributors
like us. Industry consolidation among product distributors, the
15
unavailability of products, whether due to our inability to gain
access to products or interruptions in supply from
manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could also
increase competition and adversely affect our business or
results of operations. In the future, we may be unable to
compete successfully and competitive pressures may reduce our
sales.
If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, We
May Not Be Able To Achieve Our Stated Corporate
Objectives. Our ability to manage our
anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our
ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive
officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and
retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our
stated corporate objectives.
Our Revenue Depends On Retaining Capable Sales Personnel
As Well As Our Relationships With Key Customers, Vendors And
Manufacturers Of The Products That We
Distribute. Our future operating results
depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory relationships
with qualified sales personnel who appreciate the value of our
services as well as key customers, vendors and manufacturers. If
we fail to maintain our existing relationships with such persons
or fail to acquire relationships with such key persons in the
future, our business and results of operations may be adversely
affected.
Our Future Success Is Substantially Dependent Upon Our
Senior Management. Our future success is
substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of
members of our existing senior management. Competition for
senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in
attracting and retaining key personnel, the inability of which
could have an adverse affect on our business and results of
operations.
Our Acquisitions Or Future Acquisition Efforts, Which Are
Important To Our Growth, May Not Be Successful, Which May Limit
Our Growth Or Adversely Affect Our Results Of Operations And
Financial Condition. Acquisitions have been
an important part of our development to date. During the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009, we acquired Westcon. As part of our
business strategy, we may make additional acquisitions of
companies that could complement or expand our business, augment
our market coverage, provide us with important relationships or
otherwise offer us growth opportunities. If we identify an
appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be able to
negotiate successfully the terms of or finance the acquisition.
In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
integrate the operations of our acquisitions without
encountering difficulties, including unanticipated costs,
possible difficulty in retaining customers and supplier or
manufacturing relationships, failure to retain key employees,
the diversion of our managements attention or failure to
integrate our information and accounting systems. As a result of
our acquisition of Westcon and future acquisitions, we may not
realize the revenues and cost savings that we expect to achieve
or that would justify the investments, and we may incur costs in
excess of what we anticipate. To effectively manage our expected
future growth, we must continue to successfully manage our
integration of the companies that we acquire and continue to
improve our operational systems, internal procedures, accounts
receivable and management, financial and operational controls.
If we fail in any of these areas, our business growth and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our Recently Completed Acquisition Of Westcon Makes
Evaluating Our Operating Results Difficult Given The
Significance To Our Operations, And Our Historical Results Do
Not Present An Accurate Indication Of How We Will Perform In The
Future. Our historical results of operations
do not give effect for a full fiscal year to our acquisition of
Westcon. Accordingly, our historical financial information does
not necessarily reflect what our financial position, operating
results and cash flows will be in the future as a result of this
acquisition, or give you an accurate indication of how we will
perform in the future.
The Financing Of Any Future Acquisitions We Make May
Result In Dilution To Your Stock Ownership And/Or Could Increase
Our Leverage And Our Risk Of Defaulting On Our Bank
Debt. Our business strategy includes
expansion into new markets and enhancement of our position in
existing markets, including through acquisitions. In order to
successfully complete targeted acquisitions we may issue
additional equity securities that could dilute your stock
ownership. We may also incur additional debt if we acquire
another company, which could significantly increase our leverage
and our risk of default under our existing credit facility. For
example, in financing our Westcon acquisition, we issued
150,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement
to Westcons sole shareholder and incurred approximately
$4.6 million of additional debt under our amended credit
facility to fund a portion of the purchase price.
16
Tax Legislation Initiatives Could Adversely Affect The
Companys Net Earnings And Tax
Liabilities. We are subject to the tax laws
and regulations of the United States federal, state and local
governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to
time, various legislative initiatives may be proposed that could
adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance
that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by
these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are
extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations.
Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound
and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing
precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will
not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would
be successful in any such challenge.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
We lease the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
|
Corporate Headquarters, Product Distribution Center and
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Rochester, NY
|
|
|
37,250
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Anaheim, CA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Boston, MA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Dayton, OH
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Fort Wayne, IN
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
Calibration Laboratory and Product Distribution Center
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
St. Louis, MO
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
We believe that our properties are generally in good condition,
are well maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to
carry on our business in its current form.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during
the quarter ended March 28, 2009.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol TRNS. As of June 19, 2009, we had
approximately 675 shareholders of record.
17
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market for each
quarterly period in fiscal years 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
8.96
|
|
|
$
|
9.24
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
$
|
5.58
|
|
|
$
|
3.81
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
6.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
|
$
|
7.69
|
|
|
$
|
7.49
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
4.81
|
|
|
$
|
5.46
|
|
|
$
|
3.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.13
|
|
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and
do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table provides selected financial data for fiscal
year 2009 and the previous four fiscal years (in thousands,
except per share data). Certain reclassifications of financial
information for prior fiscal years have been made to conform to
the presentation for the current fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
$
|
75,419
|
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
Cost of Products and Services Sold
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
49,860
|
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
18,748
|
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
16,062
|
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Basic Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,304
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
7,272
|
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended March
|
|
|
|
28, 2009
|
|
|
29, 2008
|
|
|
31, 2007
|
|
|
25, 2006
|
|
|
26, 2005
|
|
|
Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
4,887
|
|
|
$
|
5,442
|
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
29,391
|
|
|
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
20,207
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
4,272
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
18,619
|
|
|
|
15,117
|
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a previously deferred pre-tax
gain of $1.5 million from the sale of TPG to Fluke. See
Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
RECLASSIFICATION
OF AMOUNTS
Certain reclassifications of financial information for prior
fiscal years have been made to conform to the presentation for
the current fiscal year. In addition, certain reclassifications
of financial information for prior fiscal quarters have been
made to conform to the presentation for the current fiscal
quarters.
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview. We are a leading
global distributor of professional grade test and measurement
instruments and accredited provider of calibration, parts
inspection, production model engineering and repair services
across a wide array of measurement disciplines.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments
that offer different products and services to the same customer
base. Those two segments are distribution products and
calibration services.
In our Product segment, our Master Catalog is widely recognized
by both original equipment manufacturers and customers as the
ultimate source for test and measurement instruments.
Additionally, because we specialize in test and measurement
instruments, as opposed to a wide array of industrial products,
our sales and customer service personnel can provide value-added
technical assistance to our customers to aid them in determining
what product best meets their particular application
requirements.
Sales in our Product segment can be heavily impacted by changes
in the economic environment. As industrial customers increase or
curtail capital and discretionary spending, our product sales
will typically be directly impacted. The majority of our
products are not consumables, but are purchased as replacements,
upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and
development facilities.
Year-over-year
sales growth in any one quarter can be impacted by a number of
factors including the addition of new product lines or channels
of distribution.
Our strength in our Service segment is based upon our wide range
of disciplines and our investment in the quality systems that
are required in our targeted market segments. Our services range
from the calibration and repair of a single unit to managing a
customers entire calibration program. We believe our
Service segment offers an opportunity for long-term growth and
the potential for continuing revenue from established customers
with regular calibration cycles.
We evaluate revenue growth in both of our business segments
against a four quarter trend analysis, and not by analyzing any
single quarter.
19
Financial Overview. In evaluating our
results for fiscal year 2009, the following factors should be
taken into account:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008 operating results include
52 weeks compared with 53 weeks for fiscal year 2007.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2009 operating results include those of Westcon, a
test and measurement instrument distributor and calibration
laboratory, from the date of acquisition on August 14,
2008. We have fully integrated Westcon with our distribution and
calibrations operations in order to operate as one entity. This
included merging Westcon operations into Transcats
laboratory network and financial systems. As a result, we do not
segregate the results of Westcon from our organic business.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2008 net income includes a $0.8 million
reversal of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance. We
reversed the allowance after an evaluation of the status of our
foreign tax credits and the likelihood that these credits would
be utilized prior to their expiration.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2007 operating results included a $1.5 million
pre-tax gain from the sale of Transmation Products Group
(TPG), which had been deferred since fiscal 2002.
Net of income taxes, the impact of this previously deferred gain
on fiscal year 2007 net income was approximately
$0.9 million.
|
Net revenue for fiscal year 2009 was $75.4 million, a 7.0%
increase compared with net revenue of $70.5 million for
fiscal year 2008. Product segment sales increased 8.3% to
$51.5 million, or 68.3% of total net revenue, in fiscal
year 2009. Of our Product segment sales in fiscal year 2009, 80%
were sold directly to end-user customers while 18% were to
resellers compared with 85% and 14%, respectively, in fiscal
year 2008. Fiscal year 2009 Product segment growth includes
incremental sales associated with our acquisition of Westcon and
increased reseller sales to expand our market reach. Domestic
sales comprised 80% of the total Product segment sales in fiscal
year 2009, while 7% were to Canada and 12% were to other
international markets.
Service segment revenue increased 4.5% to $23.9 million, or
31.7% of total net revenue, in fiscal year 2009. Of our Service
segment revenue in fiscal year 2009, 80% was generated by our
Calibration Centers of Excellence while 17% was generated
through subcontracted third party vendors, compared with 80% and
18%, respectively, in fiscal year 2008.
Gross margin for fiscal year 2009 was 24.9%, a 140 basis
point decline compared with gross margin of 26.3% in fiscal year
2008. Product segment gross margin was 25.4% in fiscal year 2009
compared with 27.8% in fiscal year 2008, while Service segment
gross margin improved to 23.7% in fiscal year 2009 compared with
23.3% in fiscal year 2008.
Operating expenses were $16.1 million, or 21.3% of total
net revenue, in fiscal year 2009 compared with
$15.3 million, or 21.7% of total net revenue, in fiscal
year 2008. Operating income was $2.7 million in fiscal year
2009 compared with $3.3 million in fiscal year 2008.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The following is a summary of our most critical accounting
policies. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for a complete discussion of the significant
accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and
assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives of fixed
assets, estimated lives of our major catalogs and intangible
assets, and deferred tax asset valuation allowances. Future
events and their effects cannot be predicted with certainty;
accordingly, our accounting estimates require the exercise of
judgment. The accounting estimates used in the preparation of
our Consolidated Financial Statements will change as new events
occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information
is obtained, and as our operating environment changes. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Such changes and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
20
reported results of operations in the period in which the
changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed
in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts
receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based
upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. We
apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which
may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula
may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The
returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes
in the level of revenues
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory. Inventory consists of
products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost
or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the reserve on a
quarterly basis.
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and
Amortization. Property and equipment are
stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed
primarily under the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
2 - 10
|
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. We capitalize
certain costs incurred in the procurement and development of
computer software used for internal purposes. Leasehold
improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over
the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is
shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See
Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We
estimate the fair value of our reporting units using the fair
market value measurement requirement, rather than the
undiscounted cash flows approach. We test goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, or
immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could
exist. The evaluation of our reporting units on a fair value
basis indicated that no impairment existed as of March 28,
2009 and March 29, 2008.
Catalog Costs. We capitalize the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortize the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. We review
response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis;
and if warranted, modify the period over which costs are
recognized. We amortize the cost of each Master Catalog over an
eighteen month period and amortize the cost of each catalog
supplement over a three month period. Total unamortized catalog
costs in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.4 million as of
March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008.
Deferred Taxes. We account for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items
for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such
items will not be realized based on an assessment of both
positive and negative evidence. See Taxes below in
this section and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further details.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure
the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards
granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock,
based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant
date. We record compensation cost related to unvested stock
awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the unamortized
grant date fair value over the remaining service period of each
award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock awards are
presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a
financing
21
activity. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from tax
deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred tax
asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for such
awards. We did not capitalize any stock-based compensation costs
as part of an asset. We estimate forfeiture rates based on our
historical experience.
Options generally vest over a period of up to four years and
expire ten years from the date of grant. Beginning in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2008, options granted to executive
officers vest using a graded schedule of 0% in the first year,
20% in each of the second and third years, and 60% in the fourth
year. Prior options granted to executive officers vested equally
over three years. The expense relating to these executive
officer options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for the entire award.
During fiscal year 2009, we granted performance-based restricted
stock awards in place of options as a primary component of
executive compensation. The performance-based restricted stock
awards vest after three years subject to certain cumulative
diluted earnings per share growth targets over the eligible
three-year period. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
and in conjunction with the acquisition of Westcon, we modified
these awards by increasing the cumulative diluted earnings per
share growth performance condition. The modification did not
have an impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these
performance-based restricted awards will equal the grant-date
fair market value of the award that coincides with the actual
outcome of the performance condition. On an interim basis, we
record compensation cost based on an assessment of the
probability of achieving the performance condition. At
March 28, 2009, due to the economic conditions affecting
our fiscal year 2009 financial performance, we estimated the
probability of achievement for these performance-based awards
granted in fiscal year 2009 to be 50% of the target level.
See Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure regarding our stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition. Product sales are
recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer. We recognize the majority of our service
revenue based upon when the calibration or other activity is
performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of our service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals.
We generally invoice our customers for freight, shipping, and
handling charges. Provisions for customer returns are provided
for in the period the related revenues are recorded based upon
historical data.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do
not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
22
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the prior three fiscal
years, the components of our Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Gross Profit Percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
68.3
|
%
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
|
|
68.3
|
%
|
Service Revenue
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Other Expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 28, 2009 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
29, 2008
(dollars
in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
51,480
|
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
Service
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,419
|
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $5.0 million, or 7.0%, from fiscal
year 2008 to fiscal year 2009.
Our distribution products net sales accounted for 68.3% of our
total net revenue in fiscal year 2009 and 67.5% of our total net
revenue in fiscal year 2008.
Year-over-year
product net sales increased 8.3%, primarily due to incremental
sales associated with our acquisition of Westcon and increased
reseller sales to expand our market reach. We believe that the
overall economic environment, specifically the conditions
experienced in the second half of our fiscal year, negatively
impacted our overall sales performance for the year. This belief
stems, in part, from the number of notices we have received from
our suppliers and customers regarding plant shut downs, closures
and workforce reductions. In the first half of fiscal year 2009,
we experienced 14.1% growth in product net sales compared with
the first half of fiscal year 2008; while in the second half of
fiscal year 2009, we grew only 3.2% compared with the second
half of fiscal year 2008, including incremental sales from
23
Westcon. Our fiscal years 2009 and 2008 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales (Decline) Growth
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 was a 13-week period
compared to a 14-week period in the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2007. |
Product net sales per day increased in each quarter of fiscal
year 2009 as compared with the same period of fiscal year 2008,
except for our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. We believe
this was primarily due to a decline in the general economy. Our
product sales per business day for each fiscal quarter during
fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Per Business Day
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
Overall product sales from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009
reflect 2.8% growth in our direct distribution channel. The
direct distribution channel experienced a 7.7% growth in the
first half of fiscal year 2009, due primarily to a combination
of increased prices, new product introductions by strategic
suppliers, increased customer response to our sales and
marketing efforts, and growing sales through our website. Direct
distribution channels sales in the third quarter of fiscal
year 2009 were consistent with those in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008, but experienced a 3.1% decline from the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2008 to the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2009. We attribute this decline to the general weakness in the
economy as demand from customers decreased despite aggressive
pricing. For fiscal year 2009, our direct distribution channel
gross profit percentage decreased 160 basis points,
primarily as a result of more competitive pricing in both our
U.S. and Canadian markets. While our direct distribution
channel grew modestly in fiscal year 2009, our reseller
distribution channel increased 42.8%, when compared to fiscal
year 2008. We believe resellers continue to utilize us for our
extensive availability to a broad range of new and existing
products from within our inventory. While sales increased
significantly, our continued use of a volume-based pricing
structure allowed us to improve our reseller gross profit
percentage by 110 basis points in fiscal year 2009 when
compared to the fiscal year 2008. The following table provides
the percent of net sales and approximate gross profit percentage
for significant product distribution channels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
Reseller
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for instruments that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include
products that are requested to be calibrated in our laboratories
prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete,
orders awaiting credit approval and orders required to be
shipped at a future date. Our total pending product shipments at
the end of fiscal year 2009 decreased by approximately
$0.2 million, or 16.2% from the balance at the end of
fiscal year 2008. We believe this decrease was a result of a
decline in the general economy. The following table reflects the
percentage of total pending
24
product shipments that were backorders at the end of each fiscal
quarter in 2009 and 2008 and our historical trend of total
pending product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Pending Product Shipments
|
|
$
|
1,189
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
1,398
|
|
|
$
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
1,689
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
% of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
|
84.1
|
%
|
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
Calibration services revenue, which accounted for 31.7% of our
total net revenue in fiscal year 2009 and 32.5% of our total net
revenue in fiscal year 2008, increased 4.5% from fiscal year
2008 to fiscal year 2009. Incremental revenue achieved through
new customer acquisition, resulting from our sales and marketing
efforts and our acquisition of Westcon, was partially offset by
declines in our existing customer base. Within any year, while
we add new customers, we also have customers from the prior year
whose calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors.
Among those factors are the variations in the timing of customer
periodic calibrations on instruments and other services,
customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing
decisions. Because of the timing of calibration orders and
segment expenses can vary on a
quarter-to-quarter
basis, we believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a
better indication of the progress of this segment. Our fiscal
years 2009 and 2008 calibration service revenue in relation to
prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Revenue (Decline) Growth
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 was a 13-week period
compared to a 14-week period in the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2007. |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of
measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any
one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities,
equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to address
all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration
capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in
the core electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional
disciplines. Accordingly, 15% to 20% of Service segment revenue
is generated from outsourcing customer equipment to third party
vendors for calibration beyond our chosen scope of capabilities.
The following table provides Service segment revenue and the
percent of Service segment revenue for fiscal years 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Depot/On-site
|
|
$
|
19,106
|
|
|
|
79.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
18,236
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
%
|
Outsourced
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
13,070
|
|
|
$
|
13,205
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,678
|
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,748
|
|
|
$
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Gross profit, as a percent of total net revenue, decreased from
26.3% in fiscal year 2008 to 24.9% in fiscal year 2009.
Distribution products gross profit decreased $0.1 million,
or 1.0%, from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009. Contributing
to this decline was a greater mix of sales into our lower margin
reseller channel, a decrease of $0.3 million in income from
our rebate programs, and increased pricing discounts. These same
factors led to a decline in product profit margin from 27.8% in
fiscal year 2008 to 25.4% in fiscal year 2009.
Our product gross profit may be influenced by a number of
factors that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those
factors are sales to our reseller channel which have lower
margins than our direct customer base, periodic rebates on
purchases, and cooperative advertising received from suppliers.
The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of
our product gross profit as a percent of product net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
Other Income%(2)
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.3 million,
or 6.4%, from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009. As a percent
of service revenue, calibration services gross profit increased
40 basis points from fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009.
The improvement in calibration services gross profit and margin
is a direct result of reduced performance-based bonus and profit
sharing expense. The following table reflects our calibration
services gross profit growth in relation to prior fiscal year
quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit Dollar Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 was a 13-week period
compared to a 14-week period in the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2007. |
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
9,935
|
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,062
|
|
|
$
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses were $16.1 million, or 21.3% of total
net revenue, in fiscal year 2009 compared with
$15.3 million, or 21.7% of total net revenue, in fiscal
year 2008. Included in fiscal year 2009 operating expenses were
$1.1 million in Westcon expenses, of which
$0.3 million related to non-recurring administrative
expenses associated with integration. Exclusive of incremental
Westcon expenses, our organic operating expenses decreased 1.8%
in fiscal year 2009 compared with fiscal year 2008, primarily
due to reductions in employee stock-based compensation,
performance-based management bonus and employee profit sharing
expense, partially offset by investments in our sales and
marketing for the Service segment.
26
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense of $0.1 million in fiscal year 2009 was
consistent with interest expense in fiscal year 2008. Other
expense decreased $0.4 million from fiscal year 2008 to
fiscal year 2009 due to reduced foreign exchange losses. We have
a program in place to hedge the majority of our risk to
fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to
the Canadian dollar.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
In fiscal year 2009, we recognized a $1.0 million provision
for income taxes, compared with a $0.4 million provision in
fiscal year 2008. Fiscal year 2008 included a $0.8 million
benefit from a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation
allowance relating to our U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards.
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 29, 2008 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
31, 2007
(dollars
in thousands):
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
Service
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue increased $4.0 million, or 6.0%, from fiscal
year 2007 to fiscal year 2008.
Our distribution products net sales accounted for 67.5% of our
total net revenue in fiscal year 2008 and 68.3% of our total net
revenue in fiscal year 2007. On an annual basis, product net
sales increased 4.7% despite having 52 weeks in fiscal year
2008 compared to 53 weeks in fiscal year 2007. This
reduction of one fiscal week, which occurred in our fiscal
fourth quarter, was the key driver of the 2.4% decrease in sales
from our fiscal 2007 fourth quarter to our fiscal 2008 fourth
quarter. Our fiscal years 2008 and 2007 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales (Decline) Growth
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
Despite the decrease in distribution product net sales from our
fiscal 2007 fourth quarter to our fiscal 2008 fourth quarter,
our distribution product net sales volume per business day
increased 5.3% for the same time
27
period and 7.2% on an annual basis. Our product sales per
business day for each fiscal quarter during fiscal years 2008
and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Per Business Day
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
Overall product sales from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008
reflect an 8.0% growth in our direct distribution channel. This
growth was a result of a combination of increased prices, new
product introductions by strategic suppliers, increased customer
response to our sales and marketing efforts and growing sales
through our website. Our direct distribution channel gross
profit percentage increased 0.5 points as a result of reduced
discounting. For the same time period, our reseller channel
experienced a 10.4% increase in gross profit despite a sales
decrease of 11.9%. Sales within this channel are driven by
volume-based pricing for each reseller. During fiscal year 2008,
we adjusted our channel pricing structure, which generated a 3.5
point increase in gross profit percentage for our resellers and
a 2.6 point decline in reseller sales as a percent of total
product sales. The following table provides the percent of net
sales and approximate gross profit percentage for significant
product distribution channels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
82.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
Reseller
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for instruments that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending
product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include
products that are requested to be calibrated in our laboratories
prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete,
orders awaiting credit approval and orders required to be
shipped at a future date. Our total pending product shipments
for fiscal year 2008 decreased by approximately
$0.4 million, or 21.8% from fiscal year 2007. Fiscal year
2007 year-end backorders included a $0.4 million
remaining balance on a single large product order that was
placed by a customer during our second quarter of fiscal year
2007, but was shipped across multiple months based on an agreed
upon delivery schedule with that customer. The following table
reflects the percentage of total pending product shipments that
were backorders at the end of each fiscal quarter and our
historical trend of total pending product shipments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Pending Product Shipments
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
1,689
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
% of Pending Product Shipments that are Backorders
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
Calibration services revenue, which accounted for 32.5% of our
total net revenue in fiscal year 2008 and 31.7% of our total net
revenue in fiscal year 2007, increased 8.8% from fiscal year
2007 to fiscal year 2008. We believe changes made in our sales
structure implemented in late fiscal year 2007 and progressing
throughout fiscal year 2008, for both existing account
management and new customer acquisition, helped drive this
growth. In addition, within any year, while we may add new
customers, we may also have customers from the prior year whose
calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors. Among
those factors are the variations in the timing of customer
periodic calibrations on instruments and repair services,
customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing
decisions. Because of the timing of calibration orders and
segment expenses can vary on a
quarter-to-quarter
basis, we believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a
better
28
indication of the progress of this segment. Our fiscal years
2008 and 2007 calibration service revenue in relation to prior
fiscal year quarter comparisons, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Revenue Growth
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of
measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any
one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities,
equipment and uniquely trained personnel necessary to address
all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration
capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in
the core electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional
disciplines. Accordingly, in servicing our customers
calibration needs, we have historically subcontracted to third
party vendors, including those with unique or proprietary
capabilities, 15% to 20% of the instruments we receive from
customers for calibration. The following table provides Service
segment revenue and the percent of Service segment revenue for
fiscal years 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
% of Service
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Depot/On-site
|
|
$
|
18,236
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
16,991
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
Outsourced
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
Freight Billed to Customers
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
13,205
|
|
|
$
|
11,992
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,541
|
|
|
$
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of total net revenue, increased from
25.0% in fiscal year 2007 to 26.3% in fiscal year 2008.
Distribution products gross profit increased $1.2 million,
or 10.1%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008, primarily
because of a 4.7% increase in net sales. As a percent of net
revenue, product gross profit increased 140 basis points
from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. This was primarily
attributable to an increased mix of sales through more
profitable sales channels, improved pricing programs, and over
$0.2 million more in cooperative advertising income
received in fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007.
Our product gross profit may be influenced by a number of
factors that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those
factors are sales to our reseller channel which have lower
margins than our direct customer base, periodic rebates on
purchases, and cooperative advertising received from suppliers.
The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of
our product gross profit as a percent of product net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
Other Income%(2)
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.7 million,
or 15.5%, from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. During
fiscal year 2008, our service revenue grew at a faster rate than
our service expenses, thus leveraging investments made in our
calibration capabilities in previous years. As a percent of
service revenue, calibration services gross profit increased
140 basis points from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008
due to the aforementioned leverage gained from prior investments
in calibration services capacity. The following table reflects
our calibration services gross profit growth in relation to
prior fiscal year quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4(1)
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit Dollar Growth
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 was a 14-week period. All
other quarters are 13-week periods. |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
9,056
|
|
|
$
|
8,790
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,258
|
|
|
$
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $1.0 million, or 7.0%, from
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. Selling, marketing and
warehouse expenses increased $0.3 million, but decreased as
a percentage of total net revenue from 13.2% in fiscal year 2007
to 12.9% in fiscal year 2008. This was primarily driven by
increased expenses associated with print marketing initiatives
and our website, partially offset by reductions due to changes
made within our sales organization. Administrative expenses
increased $0.7 million from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year
2008 and increased as a percent of total net revenue from 8.2%
in fiscal year 2007 to 8.8% in fiscal year 2008. This was due
primarily to increases in stock-based compensation expense
resulting from an increase in the per share value of awards
granted, professional fees and employee-related expenses.
Gain
on TPG Divestiture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
The one-time gain in fiscal year 2007 represents the recognition
of a previously deferred gain on the sale of TPG. Although the
sale of TPG occurred in fiscal year 2002, we were precluded from
recognizing the gain at that time because we had entered into a
distribution agreement in connection with the transaction that
required us to purchase a pre-determined amount of inventory
during each calendar year from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006,
our purchases exceeded the required amount for 2006, as they had
in each of the prior four years, which fulfilled our contractual
purchase obligations under the distribution agreement and
triggered the recognition of the gain in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2007.
30
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $0.2 million from fiscal year
2007 to fiscal year 2008 due to declining debt balances. Other
expense increased $0.2 million from fiscal year 2007 to
fiscal year 2008, primarily due to an increase in foreign
currency losses resulting from a decline in the U.S. dollar
compared with the Canadian dollar in fiscal year 2008.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
In fiscal year 2008, we recognized a $0.4 million provision
for income taxes, compared with a $1.2 million provision in
fiscal year 2007. Fiscal year 2008 included a $0.8 million
benefit from a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation
allowance relating to our U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards, and fiscal year 2007 included a $0.6 million
provision for income tax relating to the recognition of a
previously deferred gain on the sale of TPG.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that amounts available under our current credit
facility and our cash on hand are sufficient to satisfy our
expected working capital and capital expenditure needs as well
as our lease commitments over the next twelve months.
Cash Flows. The following table is a
summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
3,816
|
|
|
$
|
3,593
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(7,416
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Operating Activities: Cash provided by
operating activities for fiscal year 2009 was $3.8 million
compared to $3.6 million in fiscal year 2008. Significant
working capital fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories/Accounts Payable: Due to economic
conditions in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, which we
anticipate will carry forward into the first quarter of the
fiscal year ending March 27, 2010 (fiscal year
2010), we have implemented tight monitoring controls to
drive down inventory levels. These efforts provided
approximately $0.8 million of cash from operations in
fiscal year 2009 compared to cash used of approximately
$1.0 million in fiscal year 2008. In general, our accounts
payable balance increases or decreases as a result of timing of
vendor payments for inventory receipts. In fiscal year 2009,
operating cash flow was negatively impacted by payments to
reduce accounts payable by $1.6 million, compared to an
increase in accounts payable of $0.6 million in fiscal year
2008.
|
|
|
|
Receivables: We continue to generate positive
operating cash flows and maintain strong collections on our
accounts receivable.
|
31
|
|
|
The following table illustrates our days sales outstanding from
fiscal year 2008 to fiscal year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months
|
|
$
|
14,226
|
|
|
$
|
14,557
|
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
8,981
|
|
|
$
|
9,346
|
|
Days Sales Outstanding
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Investing Activities: In fiscal year 2009, we
used $7.4 million of cash from investing activities, of
which approximately $5.6 million was associated with the
purchase of Westcon, compared to $1.5 million used in
fiscal year 2008. In addition, during fiscal year 2009, we used
$1.8 million of cash for the purchase of property and
equipment primarily for the expansion of capabilities in our
calibration laboratories which included improvements to our
facilities and infrastructure. The $1.5 million of cash
used in investing activities in fiscal year 2008 was primarily
used for the expansion of our calibration capabilities,
including the expansion of our laboratory in Rochester, New York
and equipment for our new laboratory in Anaheim, California, and
for the replacement of laboratory equipment.
Financing Activities: Financing activities
provided $3.5 million in cash during fiscal year 2009. Net
borrowings from our revolving line of credit provided
$3.2 million during fiscal year 2009, primarily due to
borrowings to acquire Westcon. In addition, $0.3 million of
cash was generated in fiscal year 2009 primarily from the
issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options
and warrants. During fiscal year 2008, we used $2.6 million
of cash from operations to decrease our overall debt. This use
of cash was offset by $0.4 million of cash generated
primarily from the issuance of common stock through the exercise
of stock options and warrants.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments. The table below contains
aggregated information about future payments related to
contractual obligations and commercial commitments such as debt
and lease agreements (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the uncertainty of forecasting expected variable rate
interest payments, this amount excludes interest portion of the
debt obligation. |
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
SFAS 141R: In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R). This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business
combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest; recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS 141R also requires acquisition-related transaction
expenses and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather
than capitalized as a component of the business combination.
SFAS 141R is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations beginning in fiscal year 2010.
SFAS 157: In September 2006, FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 was effective for
fiscal years
32
beginning after November 15, 2007. Our adoption of the
provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities
did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement of
Position (FSP)
No. 157-2,
Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS 157, for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008, our fiscal year
2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, but do not
expect the adoption to have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market
for That Asset Is Not Active
(FSP 157-3).
FSP 157-3
applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in
accordance with SFAS 157.
FSP 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in determining the
fair values of assets or liabilities in a market that is not
active.
FSP 157-3
is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of
FSP 157-3
did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP 157-4).
FSP 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased.
FSP 157-4
also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate that a transaction is not orderly.
FSP 157-4
is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, our
first quarter of fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating
the impact of adopting
FSP 157-4
on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 160: In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement
applies to the accounting for noncontrolling interests
(previously referred to as minority interests) in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160
requires noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component
of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
noncontrolling interest holders. SFAS 160 becomes effective
for us in fiscal year 2010. Since we do not currently have any
noncontrolling interests, the adoption of this statement is not
expected to have an impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
SFAS 161: In March 2008, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161).
This statement is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring
enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand
their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, our fiscal year 2010. We
are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 161 on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
EITF 03-6-1: In
June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities
(EITF 03-6-1).
EITF 03-6-1
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and
therefore, need to be included in the computation of earnings
per share under the two-class method as described in
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
EITF 03-6-1
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008, our fiscal year
2010, and earlier adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the
adoption of
EITF 03-6-1
to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
OUTLOOK
Overall, we expect modest growth in revenue in fiscal year 2010
with the benefit of a full year of Westcon business, growth
through market share gains in calibration services and an
expected improvement in the economy in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2010.
33
Both of our business segments have been and will continue to be
impacted by the economy, and we do not expect to start the year
strong. We expect our product sales to have a relatively flat
year with our fourth quarter being our strongest, whereas, our
service revenue should strengthen as we move through the year.
Revenues from both product sales and calibration services to the
wind industry should be a greater part of revenues in fiscal
year 2010. We have relationships with both the major wind
turbine manufacturers and the major utilities that are building
wind energy power and expect that this position will enable us
to accelerate our growth within this industry over the next
several years. We believe we may also indirectly benefit from
funds from the federal stimulus package that are dedicated to
alternative energy.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
INTEREST
RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing
activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our
yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than
$0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained
constant. As of March 28, 2009, $14.3 million was
available under our credit facility, subject to the maximum
borrowing restriction based on a 2.75 multiple of earnings
before income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the
preceding four consecutive fiscal quarters, of which
$3.5 million was outstanding.
Under our credit facility described in Note 3 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements, interest is adjusted on a
quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. We
mitigate our interest rate risk by electing the lower of the
base rate available under the credit facility and the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). As of March 28,
2009, the base rate and the LIBOR rate were 3.3% and 0.5%,
respectively. Our interest rate for fiscal year 2009 ranged from
1.2% to 5.5%. On March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008, we
had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to
upward movements in interest rates.
FOREIGN
CURRENCY
Over 90% of our net revenues for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were
denominated in United States dollars, with the remainder
denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the value of
the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would impact our
net revenues by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship
between the United States and Canadian currencies on a
continuous basis and adjust sales prices for products and
services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be
appropriate.
We periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to
reduce the risk that our earnings would be adversely affected by
changes in currency exchange rates. We do not apply hedge
accounting and therefore, the change in the fair value of the
contracts, which totaled less than $0.1 million in fiscal
year 2009 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2008, was
recognized as a component of other expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The change in
the fair value of the contracts is offset by the change in fair
value on the underlying receivables denominated in Canadian
dollars being hedged. On March 28, 2009, we had foreign
exchange contracts, set to mature in May 2009, outstanding in
the notional amount of $0.3 million. We do not use hedging
arrangements for speculative purposes.
34
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
INDEX
35
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 28, 2009
and March 29, 2008 and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended March 28, 2009. We have also audited the schedule
listed in the accompanying index for each of the three years in
the period ended March 28, 2009. These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 28, 2009, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
June 24, 2009
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
$
|
51,480
|
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
Service Revenue
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
|
75,419
|
|
|
|
70,453
|
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
|
38,410
|
|
|
|
34,334
|
|
|
|
33,419
|
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
|
|
18,261
|
|
|
|
17,578
|
|
|
|
16,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold
|
|
|
56,671
|
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
49,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
18,748
|
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
9,935
|
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
8,790
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
5,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
16,062
|
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,304
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,469
|
|
|
|
7,272
|
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $75
and $56 as of March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
9,346
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
5,442
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
|
16,387
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
Intangible Asset, net
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
29,391
|
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
4,748
|
|
|
$
|
5,947
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
6,720
|
|
|
|
8,498
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
10,772
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 7,656,358 and 7,446,223 shares issued as of
March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008, respectively;
7,380,576 and 7,170,441 shares outstanding as of
March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
6,649
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
5,297
|
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 275,782 shares as of
March 28, 2009 and
March 29, 2008
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
18,619
|
|
|
|
15,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
29,391
|
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Provision for (Recovery of) Accounts Receivable and Inventory
Reserves
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities, net of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(1,775
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
Purchase of Westcon, Inc., net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(5,641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(7,416
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
3,199
|
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
Payments on Other Debt Obligations
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits Related to Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
Cash at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
Income Taxes, net
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Issued in Connection with Business Acquisition
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligation
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expiration of Warrants from Debt Retirement
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in Cashless Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
$
|
3,524
|
|
|
$
|
4,641
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
(888
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,647
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
218
|
|
Reversal of Unearned Compensation
Upon Adoption of SFAS 123R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Unrecognized Prior Service Cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,229
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Unrecognized Prior Service
Cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
$
|
3,723
|
|
|
$
|
6,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
5,297
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,117
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Unrecognized Prior Service
Cost, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
7,656
|
|
|
$
|
3,828
|
|
|
$
|
8,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat or the Company) is a leading
global distributor of professional grade test and measurement
instruments and accredited provider of calibration, parts
inspection, production model engineering and repair services
primarily for the pharmaceutical and FDA-regulated, industrial
manufacturing, energy and utilities, chemical process, and other
industries.
Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated
Financial Statements of Transcat include the accounts of
Transcat, Inc. and the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Transmation (Canada) Inc. and Westcon, Inc.
(Westcon). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
On August 14, 2008, Transcat, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary Transcat Acquisition Corp. (Transcat
Acquisition), acquired Westcon, an Oregon corporation, by
merger with and into Transcat Acquisition, which was the
surviving entity. Concurrent with the closing of the merger,
Transcat Acquisitions name was changed to Westcon. See
Note 10 for further information on the acquisition.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
Transcats Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to,
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives
of fixed assets, estimated lives of major catalogs and
intangible assets, and deferred tax asset valuation allowances.
Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with
certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the
exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change
as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained, and as the operating
environment changes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in
the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their
effects are disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Fiscal Year: Transcat operates on a
52/53 week fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March.
In a 52-week fiscal year, each of the four quarters is a 13-week
period. In a 53-week fiscal year, the last quarter is a
14-week
period. The fiscal years ended March 28, 2009 (fiscal
year 2009) and March 29, 2008 (fiscal year
2008) consisted of 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 (fiscal year 2007) consisted of
53 weeks.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable
represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of
business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectability of accounts receivable. Transcat applies
a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may
be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts
to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to revenues over a specific timeframe. The
returns reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes
in the level of revenue
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory: Inventory consists of products
purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or
market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserve
on a quarterly basis.
41
Property and Equipment, Depreciation and
Amortization: Property and equipment are stated
at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed primarily
under the straight-line method over the following estimated
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Machinery, Equipment and Software
|
|
2 - 6
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
3 - 10
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
2 - 10
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. Transcat capitalizes
certain costs incurred in the procurement and development of
computer software used for internal purposes. Leasehold
improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over
the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is
shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See
Note 2 for further information on property and equipment.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Goodwill
represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the
underlying net assets of an acquired business. Other intangible
assets, namely customer base, represent an allocation of
purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of an acquired
business.
Transcat estimates the fair value of the Companys
reporting units using the fair market value measurement
requirement, rather than the undiscounted cash flows approach.
The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets for impairment
on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that
such impairment could exist. The evaluation of the
Companys reporting units on a fair value basis indicated
that no impairment existed as of March 28, 2009 and
March 29, 2008.
A summary of changes in the Companys goodwill and
intangible asset is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Book Value as of March 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,967
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions (see Note 10)
|
|
|
3,965
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value as of March 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,489
|
|
|
$
|
2,434
|
|
|
$
|
7,923
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intangible asset is being amortized on an accelerated basis
over the estimated useful life of 10 years. Estimated
intangible asset amortization expense is expected to be
$0.2 million in each of the fiscal years 2010, 2011 and
2012 and $0.1 million in each of the fiscal years 2013 and
2014.
Catalog Costs: Transcat capitalizes the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortizes the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. The Company
reviews response results from catalog mailings on a continuous
basis, and if warranted, modifies the period over which costs
are recognized. The Company amortizes the cost of each Master
Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortizes the cost of
each catalog supplement over a three month period. Total
unamortized catalog costs in prepaid expenses and other current
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.4 million
as of March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008.
Deferred Taxes: Transcat accounts for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for
items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of
such items will not be realized based on an assessment of both
positive and negative evidence. See Note 4 for further
discussion.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat
has determined the fair value of debt and other financial
instruments using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. The carrying amount of debt on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to
variable interest rate pricing, and the carrying amounts for
cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair
value due to their short-term nature.
42
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company measures
the cost of services received in exchange for all equity awards
granted, including stock options, warrants and restricted stock,
based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant
date. The Company records compensation cost related to unvested
stock awards by recognizing, on a straight line basis, the
unamortized grant date fair value over the remaining service
period of each award. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of
stock awards are presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits are
realized benefits from tax deductions for exercised awards in
excess of the deferred tax asset attributable to stock-based
compensation costs for such awards. The Company did not
capitalize any stock-based compensation costs as part of an
asset. The Company estimates forfeiture rates based on its
historical experience. During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007,
the Company recorded non-cash stock-based compensation cost in
the amount of $0.7 million, $0.8 million and
$0.4 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The estimated fair value of options and warrants granted was
calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model
(Black-Scholes), which produced a weighted average
fair value granted of $4.02 per share in fiscal year 2009, $4.59
per share in fiscal year 2008 and $4.04 per share in fiscal year
2007.
The following are the weighted average assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
Expected life
|
|
6 years
|
|
6 years
|
|
6 years
|
Annualized volatility rate
|
|
61.3%
|
|
68.3%
|
|
79.7%
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
3.3%
|
|
4.5%
|
|
4.7%
|
Dividend rate
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value
stock-based awards. The risk-free rate of return for periods
within the contractual life of the award is based on a
zero-coupon U.S. government instrument over the contractual
term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected
option term represents the period that stock-based awards are
expected to be outstanding based on the simplified method, which
averages an awards weighted-average vesting period and
expected term for plain vanilla share options.
Options are considered to be plain vanilla if they
have the following basic characteristics: granted
at-the-money;
exercisability is conditioned upon service through the vesting
date; termination of service prior to vesting results in
forfeiture; limited exercise period following termination of
service; and options are non-transferable and non-hedgeable. The
Company will continue to use the simplified method until it has
the historical data necessary to provide a reasonable estimate
of expected life. For the expected term, the Company has
plain vanilla stock options, and therefore used a
simple average of the vesting period and the contractual term
for options granted subsequent to January 1, 2006.
Revenue Recognition: Product sales are
recorded when a products title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer. The Company recognizes the majority of its
service revenue based upon when the calibration or repair
activity is performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of the service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed
intervals. The Company generally invoices its customers for
freight, shipping, and handling charges. Provisions for customer
returns are provided for in the period the related revenue is
recorded based upon historical data.
Vendor Rebates: Vendor rebates are based on a
specified cumulative level of purchases and incremental product
sales and are recorded as a reduction of cost of products sold
as the milestone is achieved.
Cooperative Advertising Income: Transcat
records cash consideration received from a vendor as a reduction
of cost of products sold as the related inventory is sold. The
Company recorded, as a reduction of cost of products sold,
consideration in the amount of $1.1 million in each of the
fiscal years 2009 and 2008 and $0.9 million in fiscal year
2007.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Freight expense
and direct shipping costs are included in cost of products and
services sold. These costs were approximately $1.5 million,
$1.4 million and $1.2 million for fiscal years 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Direct handling costs, the majority
of which represent direct compensation of employees who pick,
pack, and otherwise prepare, if necessary, merchandise for
shipment to customers are
43
reflected in selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses. These
costs were $0.5 million for fiscal year 2009 and
$0.4 million in each of the fiscal years 2008 and 2007.
Gain on TPG Divestiture: During the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2002, the Company sold Transmation
Products Group (TPG). As a result of certain
post-closing commitments, the Company deferred recognition of a
$1.5 million gain on the sale. During fiscal year 2007, the
Company satisfied those commitments and consequently realized
the gain as a component of operating income in the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 9 for further
discussion of the TPG divestiture.
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: The accounts of Transmation
(Canada) Inc. are maintained in the local currency and have been
translated to United States dollars. Accordingly, the amounts
representing assets and liabilities, except for equity, have
been translated at the period-end rates of exchange and related
revenue and expense accounts have been translated at average
rates of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising
from translation of Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance
sheets into United States dollars are recorded directly to the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of
shareholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian
business transactions. The net foreign currency loss was less
than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2009, $0.4 million in
fiscal year 2008 and less than $0.1 million in fiscal year
2007. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the
Company began utilizing foreign exchange forward contracts to
reduce the risk that future earnings would be adversely affected
by changes in currency exchange rates. The Company does not
apply hedge accounting and therefore, the change in the fair
value of the contracts, which totaled less than
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2009 and $0.2 million in
fiscal year 2008, was recognized as a component of other expense
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income. The change in the fair value of the contracts is offset
by the change in fair value on the underlying receivables
denominated in Canadian dollars being hedged. On March 28,
2009, the Company had foreign exchange contracts, set to mature
in May 2009, outstanding in the notional amount of
$0.3 million. There were no hedging arrangements
outstanding on March 29, 2008. The Company does not use
hedging arrangements for speculative purposes.
Comprehensive Income: Other comprehensive
income is comprised of net income, currency translation
adjustments and unrecognized prior service costs, net of tax. At
March 28, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive income
consisted of cumulative currency translation gains of
$0.5 million and unrecognized prior service costs, net of
tax, of $0.2 million. At March 29, 2008, accumulated
other comprehensive income consisted of cumulative currency
translation gains of $0.6 million and unrecognized prior
service costs, net of tax, of $0.2 million.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
of common stock are computed based on the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share of common stock reflect the assumed
conversion of stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted
stock awards using the treasury stock method in periods in which
they have a dilutive effect. In computing the per share effect
of assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from
the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock
are considered to have been used to purchase shares of common
stock at the average market prices during the period, and the
resulting net additional shares of common stock are included in
the calculation of average shares of common stock outstanding.
For fiscal year 2009, the net additional common stock
equivalents had no effect on the calculation of dilutive
earnings per share. For fiscal years 2008 and 2007, the net
additional common stock equivalents had a $0.01 per share effect
and a $0.02 per share effect, respectively, on the calculation
of dilutive earnings per share. The total
44
number of dilutive and anti-dilutive common stock equivalents
resulting from stock options, warrants, and unvested restricted
stock are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Anti-dilutive
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
2.20-$7.72
|
|
|
$
|
2.20-$7.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
Warrants
|
|
$
|
2.88-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.31-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain
reclassifications of financial information for prior fiscal
years have been made to conform to the presentation for the
current fiscal year.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). This
statement establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest; recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination
or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R also requires
acquisition-related transaction expenses and restructuring costs
be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a component
of the business combination. SFAS 141R is to be applied
prospectively to business combinations beginning in the
Companys fiscal year ending March 27, 2010
(fiscal year 2010).
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines
fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
does not require any new fair value measurements but rather
eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 was effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets
and liabilities did not have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement of
Position (FSP)
No. 157-2,
Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008, the Companys
fiscal year 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of SFAS 157 on nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, but does not expect the adoption to have a material
impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market
for That Asset Is Not Active
(FSP 157-3).
FSP 157-3
applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in
accordance with SFAS 157.
FSP 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in determining the
fair values of assets or liabilities in a market that is not
active.
FSP 157-3
is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of
FSP 157-3
did not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP 157-4).
FSP 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased.
45
FSP 157-4
also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate that a transaction is not orderly.
FSP 157-4
is to be applied prospectively and is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, the
Companys first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting
FSP 157-4
on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). This statement applies to the
accounting for noncontrolling interests (previously referred to
as minority interests) in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires
noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of
equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
noncontrolling interest holders. SFAS 160 becomes effective
for the Company in fiscal year 2010. Since the Company does not
currently have any noncontrolling interests, the adoption of
this statement is not expected to have an impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). This statement is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, the Companys fiscal year 2010. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS 161 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities
(EITF 03-6-1).
EITF 03-6-1
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and
therefore, need to be included in the computation of earnings
per share under the two-class method as described in
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
EITF 03-6-1
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008, the Companys
fiscal year 2010, and earlier adoption is prohibited. The
Company does not expect the adoption of
EITF 03-6-1
to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
$
|
15,475
|
|
|
$
|
13,875
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
$
|
17,820
|
|
|
$
|
15,952
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(13,646
|
)
|
|
|
(12,741
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
4,174
|
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$1.1 million in each of the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 and
$1.0 million in fiscal year 2007.
Description. On August 14, 2008,
Transcat amended its credit agreement (the Chase Credit
Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The amendment to
the Chase Credit Agreement provided for an increase in the
amount available under the revolving credit facility (the
Revolving Credit Facility) from $10 million to
$15 million, an extension of the maturity date from
November 2009 to August 2011 and an increase in interest and
commitment fees. All other terms were unchanged. As of
March 28, 2009, $14.3 million was available under the
Chase Credit Agreement, subject to the maximum borrowing
restriction based on a 2.75 multiple of earnings before income
taxes, depreciation and amortization for the preceding four
consecutive fiscal quarters, of which $3.5 million was
outstanding.
46
Interest and Other Costs. Interest on
the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of
prime, a three month certificate of deposit plus 1%, or the
federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1%) (the Base Rate) or the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case, plus a margin.
Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of
unused credit available on the Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest and commitment fees are adjusted on a quarterly basis
based upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as
defined in the Chase Credit Agreement. The Base Rate and the
LIBOR rates as of March 28, 2009 were 3.3% and 0.5%,
respectively. The Companys interest rate for fiscal year
2009 ranged from 1.2% to 5.5%. If the Chase Credit Agreement, as
amended, had been in effect for the entire fiscal year ended
March 28, 2009, the Companys interest rate would have
ranged from 1.2% to 5.5%. Loan costs associated with the Chase
Credit Agreement, totaling less than $0.1 million, are
being amortized over the term of the agreement.
Covenants. The Chase Credit Agreement
has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply,
including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio
covenant. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants
and requirements throughout fiscal year 2009.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged
all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property
and the common stock of Transmation (Canada) Inc. and Westcon as
collateral security for the loans made under the Revolving
Credit Facility.
Transcats net income before income taxes on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,519
|
|
|
$
|
2,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net provision for income taxes for fiscal years 2009, 2008
and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Current Tax Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
State
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1,036
|
|
State
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed by
applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and
the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Federal Income Tax at Statutory Rate
|
|
$
|
856
|
|
|
$
|
933
|
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
State Income Taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Valuation Allowance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2008, after assessing all available evidence, the
Company determined that it was more likely than not that the
benefits associated with its U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards would be realized. As a |
47
|
|
|
|
|
result, the Company reduced its deferred tax valuation allowance
by $0.8 million and recorded the reduction as a benefit
from income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
Other
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
Foreign Tax Credits (expiring in March 2018)
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
Valuation Allowance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2009, as a result of the expiration of unused
U.S. research and development credit carryforwards, the Company
wrote off the corresponding deferred tax asset and reduced its
remaining deferred tax valuation allowance. |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis
differences related to the investments in the Companys
foreign subsidiary, which consist primarily of undistributed
earnings. During fiscal year 2008, the Companys foreign
subsidiary declared and paid dividends to Transcat in the amount
of $2.6 million (in U.S. dollars), of which
$1.3 million was previously taxed. The Company incurred
additional tax of $0.4 million on the remaining dividend,
which was fully offset by the utilization of a portion of the
Companys available foreign tax credits, as a component of
the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The remaining earnings of the Companys foreign
subsidiary are considered permanently reinvested in the
subsidiary, therefore, the determination of the deferred tax
liability on unremitted earnings is not practicable because such
liability, if any, depends on circumstances existing if and when
remittance occurs.
Effective April 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 established
a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions
and clarified the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to
meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Upon
adoption of FIN 48, the Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, the Company
recognized no adjustments for uncertain tax benefits and expects
no material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the
next twelve months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related
to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. No
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were
recognized in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 or were accrued at
March 28, 2009 and March 29, 2008.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various states and Canada. The Company is no
longer subject to examination by U.S. federal income tax
authorities for the tax years 2005 and prior, by state tax
authorities for the tax years 2005 and prior, and by Canadian
tax authorities for the tax
48
years 2002 and prior. There are no tax years currently under
examination by U.S. federal, state or Canadian tax
authorities.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION PLAN
|
All of Transcats United States based employees are
eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan, the
Long-Term Savings and Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (the
Plan), provided certain qualifications are met.
In the long-term savings portion of the Plan (the 401K
Plan), plan participants are entitled to a distribution of
their vested account balance upon termination of employment or
retirement. Plan participants are fully vested in their
contributions while Company contributions vest over a three year
period. The Companys matching contributions to the 401K
Plan were $0.3 million in each of the fiscal years 2009 and
2008, and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2007. In March 2009,
the Company temporarily suspended matching contributions to the
401K Plan.
In the deferred profit sharing portion of the Plan, Company
contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
POSTRETIREMENT
HEALTH CARE PLANS
|
In December 2006, the Company adopted two defined benefit
postretirement health care plans. One plan provides limited
reimbursement to eligible non-officer participants for the cost
of individual medical insurance coverage purchased by the
participant following qualifying retirement from employment with
the Company (the Non-Officer Plan). The other plan
provides long-term care insurance benefits, medical and dental
insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to
eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses
(the Officer Plan).
The change in the postretirement benefit obligation is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at beginning of fiscal year
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal year
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, at end of fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status, at end of year
|
|
$
|
(458
|
)
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, at end of fiscal
year
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is included as
a component of other liabilities (non-current) in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The components of net periodic
postretirement benefit cost and other amounts recognized in
other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, at
end of fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prior service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of active participants
for the Non-Officer Plan and over the average remaining life
expectancy of active participants for the Officer Plan. The
estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive gain into net periodic
postretirement benefit cost during the fiscal year 2010 is less
than $0.1 million.
The postretirement benefit obligation was computed by an
independent third party actuary. Assumptions used to determine
the postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic
benefit cost were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
Medical care cost trend rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Dental care cost trend rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend rate assumed for next year and remaining at that level
thereafter
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Benefit payments are funded by the Company as needed. Payments
toward the cost of a retirees medical and dental coverage,
which are initially determined as a percentage of a base
coverage plan in the year of retirement as defined in the plan
document, are limited to increase at a rate of no more than 3%
per year. The
50
following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
2012
|
|
|
29
|
|
2013
|
|
|
43
|
|
2014
|
|
|
63
|
|
2015-2019
|
|
|
327
|
|
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one
percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation and the annual net periodic cost by less than
$0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the
healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic
cost by less than $0.1 million.
|
|
NOTE 7
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended (the
2003 Plan), provides for, among other awards, grants
of restricted stock and stock options to directors, officers and
key employees to purchase common stock at no less than the fair
market value at the date of grant. In addition, Transcat
maintains a warrant plan for directors (the
Directors Warrant Plan). At March 28,
2009, the number of shares available for future grant under the
2003 Plan totaled 0.3 million.
Stock Options: Options generally vest over a
period of up to four years and expire ten years from the date of
grant. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008,
options granted to executive officers vest using a graded
schedule of 0% in the first year, 20% in each of the second and
third years, and 60% in the fourth year. Prior options granted
to executive officers vested equally over three years. The
expense relating to these executive officer options is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for the entire award.
The following table summarizes the Companys options for
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2009 and the exercise price,
51
multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) that
would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on March 28, 2009. The
amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the
fair market value of the Companys stock.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock
options as of March 28, 2009 was $1.0 million, which
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options
exercised was less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2009,
$0.3 million in fiscal year 2008 and $0.7 million in
fiscal year 2007. Cash receipts from the exercise of options
were less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2009,
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2008 and less than
$0.1 million in fiscal year 2007.
The following table presents options outstanding and exercisable
as of March 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.20-$3.50
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
$3.51-$5.00
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
$5.01-$6.50
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
$6.51-$7.72
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7.65
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
7.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant
Plan, as amended, warrants have been granted to non-employee
directors to purchase common stock at the fair market value at
the date of grant. Warrants vest over a three year period and
expire in five years from the date of grant. All warrants
authorized for issuance pursuant to the Directors Warrant
Plan have been granted. Warrants outstanding on March 28,
2009 continue to vest and be exercisable in accordance with the
terms of the Directors Warrant Plan.
The following table summarizes warrants for fiscal years 2009,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 29, 2008
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 28, 2009
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the-money warrants) that would have been received
by the warrant holders had all warrant holders exercised their
warrants on March 28, 2009. The amount of aggregate
intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys stock. The aggregate intrinsic value of
warrants
52
exercised was $0.1 million in fiscal year 2009,
$0.2 million in fiscal year 2008 and $0.1 million in
fiscal year 2007. Cash received from the exercise of warrants
was less than $0.1 million in each of the fiscal years
2009, 2008 and 2007.
The following table presents warrants outstanding and
exercisable as of March 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
|
(in Shares)
|
|
Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.88
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
$4.26
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
$5.80
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 13, 2002, the Company granted warrants to
purchase 0.5 million shares of common stock to its prior
lenders, Key Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank, in accordance with a
termination agreement for the refinancing of debt. In each of
the fiscal years 2005 and 2006, 0.1 million of the shares
expired unexercised. In November 2007, the remaining
0.3 million shares expired unexercised and were converted
to capital in excess of par value.
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows
the Company to grant stock awards. During fiscal year 2009, the
Company granted performance-based restricted stock awards in
place of options as a primary component of executive
compensation. The performance-based restricted stock awards vest
after three years subject to certain cumulative diluted earnings
per share growth targets over the eligible three-year period.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 and in conjunction
with the acquisition of Westcon, the Company modified these
awards by increasing the cumulative diluted earnings per share
growth performance condition. The modification did not have an
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Compensation cost ultimately recognized for these
performance-based restricted awards will equal the grant-date
fair market value of the award that coincides with the actual
outcome of the performance condition. On an interim basis, the
Company records compensation cost based on an assessment of the
probability of achieving the performance condition. At
March 28, 2009, the Company estimated the probability of
achievement for these performance-based awards granted in fiscal
year 2009 to be 50% of the target level. During fiscal year
2009, total expense relating to performance-based restricted
stock awards, based on grant-date fair market value and the
estimated probability of achievement, was less than
$0.1 million. Unearned compensation totaled
$0.2 million as of March 28, 2009.
Restricted stock awards granted in fiscal year 2008 vested
immediately and awards granted in fiscal year 2007 vested 50% at
date of grant and 50% one year later. Total expense, based on
fair market value, amounted to $0.2 million and
$0.1 million in fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively.
There was no unearned compensation at March 29, 2008.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
|
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution
Products (Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no
inter-segment revenues. The following table presents segment and
geographic data for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Net Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
51,480
|
|
|
$
|
47,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
Service
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
75,419
|
|
|
|
70,453
|
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
13,070
|
|
|
|
13,205
|
|
|
|
11,992
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,678
|
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,748
|
|
|
|
18,541
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product(1)
|
|
|
9,622
|
|
|
|
9,392
|
|
|
|
8,467
|
|
Service(1)
|
|
|
6,440
|
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
5,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,062
|
|
|
|
15,258
|
|
|
|
14,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
|
$
|
2,363
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
16,807
|
|
|
$
|
13,871
|
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
Service
|
|
|
10,233
|
|
|
|
7,407
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
3,066
|
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,391
|
|
|
$
|
24,344
|
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
739
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
Service
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
Service
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
|
$
|
1,505
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues to Unaffiliated Customers(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
70,353
|
|
|
$
|
63,945
|
|
|
$
|
59,673
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
5,066
|
|
|
|
6,508
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,419
|
|
|
$
|
70,453
|
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
4,065
|
|
|
$
|
3,093
|
|
|
$
|
2,613
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,174
|
|
|
$
|
3,211
|
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on
actual amounts, a percentage of revenues, headcount, and
managements estimates. |
54
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets were allocated based on the
percentage of segment revenue acquired. For fiscal year 2009,
goodwill and intangible assets of $9.0 million were
allocated between our segments as follows: 66% to Product and
34% to Service. For fiscal years 2008 and 2007, goodwill of
$3.0 million was allocated between our segments as follows:
51% to Product and 49% to Service. |
|
(3) |
|
Including amortization of catalog costs. |
|
(4) |
|
Net revenues are attributed to the countries based on the
destination of a product shipment or the location where service
is rendered. |
|
(5) |
|
United States includes Puerto Rico. |
Leases: Transcat leases facilities, equipment,
and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental
expense was approximately $1.2 million for fiscal year 2009
and $1.1 million in each of fiscal years 2008 and 2007. The
minimum future annual rental payments under the non-cancelable
leases at March 28, 2009 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
2013
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
2014
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concurrent with the acquisition of Westcon, the Company entered
into an agreement to lease property in Portland, Oregon for a
calibration laboratory and product distribution center. The
facility, which is owned by an executive officer of the Company
(the former sole shareholder of Westcon) is being leased under a
non-cancelable operating lease over a three year period
commencing on the acquisition date. The minimum future annual
rental payments are approximately $0.1 million per year.
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In fiscal
year 2002, in connection with the sale of TPG to Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), the Company entered
into a distribution agreement with Fluke. Under the distribution
agreement, among other items, the Company agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory during each calendar year
from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006, the Companys
purchases exceeded the required amount for calendar year 2006,
as they had in each of the prior four years, which fulfilled the
Companys contractual purchase obligations to Fluke under
the distribution agreement and triggered the recognition of the
previously deferred gain totaling $1.5 million in fiscal
year 2007.
On August 14, 2008, Transcat, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary Transcat Acquisition, acquired Westcon pursuant to an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Westcon and its sole shareholder. Westcon is a distributor
of professional grade test and measurement instruments and a
provider of calibration and repair services to customers located
primarily in the western United States.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Westcon merged with and into
Transcat Acquisition. Concurrent with the closing of the merger,
Transcat Acquisitions name was changed to Westcon.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Transcat paid an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $6.9 million,
which was paid in a combination of the issuance of
150,000 shares of Transcat common stock valued at
approximately $1.1 million and approximately
$5.8 million in cash. A portion of the cash purchase price,
aggregating $0.5 million, was distributed to satisfy
certain debt obligations of Westcon, with the remainder being
paid to the sole shareholder. An additional contingent payment
of up to $1.4 million is subject to holdback restrictions
and is intended to secure the obligations of Westcon and the
sole shareholder for post-
55
closing adjustments, reimbursement and indemnification under the
terms of the Merger Agreement. This contingent payment is
expected to be recorded as additional purchase price at the time
the payment is certain.
In addition, Transcat and the sole shareholder entered into an
Earn Out Agreement dated as of the closing of the merger. This
agreement provides that the sole shareholder may be entitled to
certain contingent earn out payments subject to continued
employment and Westcon achieving certain post-closing profit and
revenue targets. These potential future payments are expected to
be recorded as compensation expense in the period earned.
The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price
allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid to Seller at Closing
|
|
$
|
4,216
|
|
Westcon Debt Paid by Transcat at Closing
|
|
|
466
|
|
Fair Value of Common Stock Issued
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
Cash Paid to Seller in November 2008
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
Direct Acquisition Costs
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price:
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset Customer Base
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
Deferred Tax Liability
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
Plus: Current Assets
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
Non-Current Assets
|
|
|
274
|
|
Less: Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
Non-Current Liabilities
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Price
|
|
$
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities of the acquired business are recorded
under the purchase method of accounting at their estimated fair
values as of the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents costs
in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets
of the acquired business. Other intangible assets, namely
customer base, represent an allocation of purchase price to
identifiable intangible assets of the acquired business.
Intangible assets are being amortized for financial reporting
purposes on an accelerated basis over the estimated useful life
of 10 years. Goodwill and the intangible assets are not
deductible for tax purposes.
The primary reasons for the Companys acquisition of
Westcon and the principal factors that contribute to the
recognition of goodwill are the strengthening of the
Companys presence in the western United States
and/or the
synergies and related cost savings gained from the integration
of the acquired operation.
The results of operations of Westcon are included in
Transcats consolidated operating results as of the date
the business was acquired. The following unaudited pro forma
results assume the acquisition occurred at the beginning of each
period presented. The pro forma results do not purport to
represent what the Companys results of operations actually
would have been if the transactions set forth had occurred on
the date indicated or what the Companys results of
operations will be in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
|
Net Revenue
|
|
$
|
78,569
|
|
|
$
|
79,781
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
56
|
|
NOTE 11
|
QUARTERLY
DATA (Unaudited)
|
The following table presents a summary of certain unaudited
quarterly financial data for fiscal years 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
FY 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
18,964
|
|
|
$
|
5,042
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
19,992
|
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
17,853
|
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
FY 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
19,198
|
|
|
$
|
5,355
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Third Quarter(1)
|
|
|
18,440
|
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
16,190
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company reversed
$0.8 million of its deferred tax valuation allowance. See
Note 4 for further disclosure. |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Realized in
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
Allowance/
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of the Year
|
|
|
of Operations
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
the Year
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
Reserve for Inventory Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
FY 2008
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
58
ITEM 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on
this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Our internal control system
was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. In designing and evaluating our internal control
system, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives
and that the effectiveness of any system has inherent
limitations including, but not limited to, the possibility of
human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and
procedures. Management, including the principal executive
officer and the principal financial officer, is required to
apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected in a timely
manner.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including the principal
executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our procedures and
internal control over financial reporting using the framework
and criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
evaluation, our management, including the principal executive
officer and the principal financial officer, concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective in
providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of our financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles as of March 28, 2009.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our
independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Managements report on
internal control over financial reporting was not subject to
attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit us to provide only managements
report in this annual report.
(c) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our
fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
59
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Executive Officers in Part I of this report and
from our definitive 2009 proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from our definitive 2009 proxy statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, with the exception of the
information in the table below, is incorporated herein by
reference from our definitive 2009 proxy statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans as of March 28, 2009:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
|
|
|
|
to be issued
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
for future issuance under
|
|
|
|
upon exercise of
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
equity compensation plans
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
reflected in column (a))
|
|
Plan category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
781
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
$
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes performance-based restricted stock awards granted to
officers and key employees pursuant to our 2003 Incentive Plan.
See Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8 of Part II. |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from our definitive 2009 proxy statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference from our definitive 2009 proxy statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of this report.
(b) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits contained in this report.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 24, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles
P.
Hadeed Charles
P. Hadeed
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Operating Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Charles
P. Hadeed
Charles
P. Hadeed
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ John
J. Zimmer
John
J. Zimmer
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Carl
E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Francis
R. Bradley
Francis
R. Bradley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harrison
Richard
J. Harrison
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Nancy
D. Hessler
Nancy
D. Hessler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Paul
D. Moore
Paul
D. Moore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Harvey
J. Palmer
Harvey
J. Palmer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ Alan
H. Resnick
Alan
H. Resnick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 24, 2009
|
|
/s/ John
T. Smith
John
T. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
|
61
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
The Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995 and from Exhibit 3(i) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Code of Regulations, as amended through May 4, 2009, are
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 5, 2009.
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
#10.1
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 99(b) to
the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
#10.2
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein from Exhibit 99(e) to the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
#10.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
#10.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit II to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
#10.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit V to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
#10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
#10.7
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(k) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
|
#10.8
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated Directors Warrant Plan are incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys definitive proxy statement
filed on July 7, 1998 in connection with the 1998 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
#10.9
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Appendix B to the Companys 1999 preliminary
proxy statement filed on June 21, 1999 in connection with
the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
#10.10
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock
Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
#10.11
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Incentive Stock Options granted under
the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
#10.12
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Restricted Stock granted under the
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.2 the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
#10.13
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate representing warrants granted under
the Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.42 to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2005.
|
|
|
#10.14
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Non-Qualified Stock Options granted
under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 24, 2005.
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Transcat, Inc., N.W.
Calibration Inspection, Inc. and the stockholders of N.W.
Calibration Inspection, Inc. dated as of February 28, 2006
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to
the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 28, 2006.
|
|
|
#10.16
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Agreement for Severance Upon Change
in Control for Charles P. Hadeed is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 19, 2006.
|
|
|
#10.17
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated
herein by reference from Appendix D to the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July 10, 2006 in
connection with the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of November 21, 2006 by and
between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 21, 2006.
|
|
|
#10.19
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Officers is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
#10.20
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for Non-Officer
Employees is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.3 the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
#10.21
|
|
Certain compensation information for certain executive officers
of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 21, 2007.
|
|
|
#10.22
|
|
Certain compensation information for Charles P. Hadeed,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
of the Company, and John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is incorporated
herein by reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 5, 2008.
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Amendment Number One to Credit Agreement dated as of
August 14, 2008 between Transcat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Transcat Acquisition
Corp., Westcon, Inc. and David Goodhead dated as of
August 14, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Lease Addendum between Gallina Development Corporation and
Transcat, Inc. dated June 2, 2008 is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 27, 2008.
|
|
|
#10.26
|
|
Amendment to Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control for
Charles P. Hadeed dated December 16, 2008 is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 27, 2008.
|
|
|
*#10.27
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Performance-Based Restricted Stock
granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
*10.28
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2009 Insider Stock Sales Plan.
|
(11)
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
|
|
|
|
Computation can be clearly determined from the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income included in
this
Form 10-K
as Item 8.
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
*21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
(23)
|
|
Consents of experts and counsel
|
|
|
*23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibit filed with this report. |
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
64