e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 000-26966
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
84-0846841 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1625 Sharp Point Drive, Fort Collins, CO |
|
80525 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (970) 221-4670
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value |
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yeso Noþ.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $813,409,490 as of June 29, 2007, based upon the price at which such common stock
was last sold on such date.
43,732,707
(Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 12, 2008)
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the
registrants definitive proxy statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled to
be held on May 7, 2008. Except as expressly incorporated by reference, the registrants definitive
proxy statement shall not be deemed to be a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this Form 10-K, references to Advanced
Energy, the Company, we, us or our refer to Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We develop innovative power and control technologies that enable high-growth, plasma-based
thin-film manufacturing processes worldwide, including semiconductors, flat panel displays, data
storage products, solar cells, architectural glass, and other advanced product applications. We
also develop grid-connect inverters for the solar energy market.
Our installed base enables recurring revenue opportunities as we sell spare parts, repair
services and field upgrades worldwide through our customer service and technical support
organization.
We provide solutions to a diverse range of markets and geographic regions, with the
semiconductor capital equipment industry being our largest market. Sales to customers in the
semiconductor capital equipment industry comprised 69% of our sales in each of 2006 and 2007 and
63% of our sales in 2005. Other markets we serve include flat panel display, data storage,
architectural glass, solar and other industrial thin-film manufacturing.
We incorporated in Colorado in 1981 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1995. Our executive
offices are located at 1625 Sharp Point Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, and our telephone
number is 970-221-4670.
Products
Our products fall into five categories: Power Conversion, Flow Control Technologies,
Solar Inverter, Thermal Instrumentation, and Source Technology. Our products are designed to enable
new process technologies, improve productivity and lower the cost of ownership for our customers.
POWER CONVERSION
Our power conversion systems include direct current (DC), high power, low and mid
frequency, and radio frequency (RF) power supplies, matching networks and RF instrumentation. Our
power conversion systems refine, modify and control the raw electrical power from a utility and
convert it into power that is customized, predictable and repeatable. Our power conversion systems
are primarily used by semiconductor and similar thin-film manufacture including flat panel display,
data storage and architectural glass manufacturers in the following applications: physical vapor
deposition; chemical vapor deposition; reactive sputtering; electroplating; plasma vacuum
processes; oxide, poly and conductor etch; and carbon dioxide laser excitation.
FLOW CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
Our flow control technology products include thermal mass flow controllers (MFCs),
pressure-based MFCs, liquid MFCs, liquid vapor delivery systems, pressure control systems and
ultrasonic control systems. Our flow control technology products control or monitor the flow of
high-purity liquids, liquid vapor, and gases encompassing a wide range of input pressures. Our flow
control technology products are primarily used in semiconductor, flat panel display manufacturing
and similar thin-film applications, fiber optics, safe delivery systems and silica industries.
1
SOLAR INVERTER
Our solar inverter products include a line of photovoltaic (PV) energy inverters that
offer an advanced, transformerless, grid-tie PV solution for commercial system installations. Our
PV inverter is designed to convert raw, solar DC power from standard solar arrays to high-quality
AC grid electricity enabling commercial installations to produce targeted output power levels with
fewer solar modules.
THERMAL INSTRUMENTATION
Our thermal instrumentation products, used primarily in the semiconductor industry,
provide thermal management and control solutions for applications in which time-temperature cycles
affect productivity and yield. They are used in physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor
deposition, rapid thermal processing and other semiconductor applications requiring non-contact
temperature measurement.
SOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Our source technology products include plasma and ion beam sources which are used in the
direct deposition of thin films of diamond-like carbon, ion-assisted deposition, ion beam etching,
optical coating, industrial coating, pre-cleaning and chamber cleaning. Our plasma-source platforms
are complete systems, including a remote plasma source, a power supply and an active matching
network.
Markets, Applications and Customers
MARKETS
The following is a discussion of the major markets for our products.
SEMICONDUCTOR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKET. The majority of our sales have been
to customers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry for incorporation into equipment used
in the major semiconductor processing steps that make integrated circuits, as well as to other
equipment manufacturers discussed below. Sales to customers in the semiconductor
capital equipment industry comprised 69% of our sales in each of 2007 and 2006 and 63%
of our sales in 2005. Our power conversion systems provide the energy to enable chemical reaction
for thin-film processes such as deposition and etch. Our flow control technology products control
the fluid or gas being delivered to ensure accuracy, repeatability and stability. Our thermal
instrumentation products measure the temperature of the process chamber. Our source technology
products optimize chemical vapor deposition (CVD) clean, deposition and etch processes. Precise
control over the energy delivered to plasma-based processes enables the production of integrated
circuits with reduced feature sizes and increased speed and performance. We anticipate that the
semiconductor capital equipment industry will continue to be a substantial part of our business for
the foreseeable future.
FLAT PANEL DISPLAY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKET. We sell our products to manufacturers of
flat panel displays and flat panel projection devices, which have thin film deposition processes
similar to those employed in manufacturing integrated circuits. Flat panel technology produces
bright, sharp, large, color-rich images on flat screens for products ranging from hand-held devices
to laptop and desktop computer monitors to plasma and liquid crystal display (LCD) screen
televisions. The transition to larger panel sizes and higher display resolution is driving the need
for tighter process controls to reduce manufacturing costs and defects. There are three major types
of flat panel displays: LCDs, field emitter displays, and gas plasma displays. We sell our
products to all of the flat panel markets.
SOLAR CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKET. We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) and manufacturers of solar cells who use our products to produce thin-films using both bulk
silicon substrates as
2
well as glass or metal substrates. The majority of solar cell manufacturing currently uses a bulk
silicon wafer as the substrate, which requires both CVD and physical vapor deposition (PVD) thin
film processes. The solar cell industry also has developed processes for manufacturing solar cells
on non-silicon substrates such as glass, plastic or metal using thin film processes that will also
employ CVD and PVD tools. Our RF and DC power supply and flow products are designed for use in
these CVD and PVD tools. The CIGS, CIS and CADtel solar cell manufacturing process also requires
thin film processing which requires our power supply and flow products.
DATA STORAGE CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKETS. We sell products to manufacturers of data storage
equipment and data storage devices for use in producing a variety of products, including CDs and
DVDs (read-only, one-time recordable and rewriteable); computer hard discs, including both media
and thin-film heads; and magneto-optical storage media. These
products use a PVD process to produce optical and magnetic thin-film layers as well as a protective-wear
layer. In this market, the trend towards higher recording densities requires thinner and more
precise films. The use of equipment incorporating magnetic media to store analog and digital data
expands with the growth of the laptop, desktop and workstation computer markets and the consumer
electronics audio, video, gaming and entertainment markets.
ARCHITECTURAL GLASS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKET. We sell our products to OEMs and to producers
of Low Emissivity or Low-E architectural glass. This glass is used in commercial and residential
buildings to reflect heat and cold through the use of thin films coated directly on the glass which
reduces the energy used in the building. The thin film deposition process employs PVD tools which
use our DC power products. This market is driven by end market demand for glass related to the
residential and commercial construction industry.
INDUSTRIAL
PRODUCTS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT MARKETS. We sell our products to OEMs and producers of end
products who use thin films in a variety of industrial markets. Thin films of diamond-like coatings
and other materials are applied to products in plasma-based processes to strengthen and harden
surfaces on such diverse products as tools, automotive parts and
various other end products. The advanced thin-film production processes allow precise control of various optical
and physical properties, including color, transparency and electrical and thermal conductivity. The
improved adhesion and high-film quality resulting from plasma-based processing make it the
preferred method of applying the thin films. Many of these thin-film industrial applications
require power levels substantially greater than those used in our other markets.
COMMERCIAL SOLAR INVERTER MARKET. We sell a commercial solar inverter to integrators who
integrate our Solaron inverter into their solar array solutions. The Solaron converts DC power,
which is produced by the solar panels in the array, into AC power for consumption on-site or to be
sold back through the public utility grid. The commercial solar inverter market is characterized
by installations generating power above 100kw. We introduced the 333kw Solaron product in
September 2007.
3
CUSTOMERS
Our products are sold worldwide to more than 100 OEMs and directly to more than 500 end users.
Our ten largest customers accounted for 61%, of our sales in 2007, 63% of our sales in 2006 and 57%
of our sales in 2005. We expect that sales of our products to these customers will continue to
account for a large percentage of our sales for the foreseeable future.
Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted for 29% of our sales in 2007,
30% of our sales in 2006 and 23% of our sales in 2005. Ulvac, Inc., our largest customer in the
flat panel display industry, accounted for 11% of our sales in 2005. With the exceptions of
Applied Materials and Ulvac, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales during
2007, 2006 or 2005.
Backlog
Our backlog decreased 18% from $56 million at December 31, 2006 to $46 million at
December 31, 2007. We schedule production of our systems based on order backlog and customer
commitments. Backlog includes orders scheduled to ship in the following twelve months for which
written authorizations have been accepted and revenue has not been recognized. Due to possible
customer changes in delivery schedules and cancellations of orders, our backlog at any particular
date is not indicative of actual sales for any succeeding period. Delays in delivery schedules
and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations.
Marketing, Sales and Service
We sell our products primarily through direct sales personnel to customers in the United
States, Europe and Asia. Our sales personnel are located at our headquarters in Fort Collins,
Colorado, and in sales offices in San Jose, California; Austin Texas; and Vancouver, Washington. To
serve customers in Asia and Europe, we have offices in Shanghai, China; Bicester, England;
Filderstadt, Germany; Hachioji, Japan; Sungnam City, South Korea; and Hsinchu and Taipei, Taiwan.
These offices have primary responsibility for sales in their respective markets. We also
4
have sales
representatives and distributors inside and outside the United States. We maintain customer service
offices at many of the locations listed above, as well as other sites chosen considering our
customer locations as we believe that customer service and technical support are important
competitive factors and are essential to building and maintaining close, long-term relationships
with our customers.
The following table represents our net sales by geographic region and percentage of net sales
for the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
207,265 |
|
|
$ |
238,468 |
|
|
$ |
163,657 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
42,051 |
|
|
|
41,760 |
|
|
|
34,228 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
135,383 |
|
|
|
130,514 |
|
|
|
127,597 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Item 1A. Risk Factors beginning on page 8 for a discussion of certain risks attendant to
our foreign operations.
Manufacturing
Our manufacturing locations are in Shenzhen, China; Fort Collins, Colorado; Hachioji,
Japan; and Vancouver, Washington. In 2005, we completed the realignment of our worldwide
manufacturing infrastructure, with Shenzhen, China being the central high-volume manufacturing
site. The rest of our manufacturing locations produce low volume, high end products, service and
support.
We manufacture different products at each facility. Our manufacturing activities consist
of the assembly and testing of components and subassemblies, which are then integrated into our
final products. Once final testing of all electrical and electro-mechanical subassemblies is
completed, the final product is subjected to a series of reliability-enhancing operations prior to
shipment to our customers. We purchase a wide range of electronic, mechanical and electrical
components, some of which are designed to our specifications.
Intellectual Property
We
have a practice of seeking patent protection for inventions governing new products or
technologies as part of our ongoing research, development and manufacturing activities. We
currently hold 89 United States patents, 54 foreign-issued patents, and have over 100 patent
applications pending in the United States, Europe and Asia. Generally, our efforts to obtain
international patents have been concentrated in the industrialized
countries of Europe and Asia, because there are other manufacturers and developers of power conversion and control
systems in those countries as well as customers for those systems.
Litigation may from time to time be necessary to enforce patents issued to us, to protect
trade secrets or know-how owned by us, to defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of
others or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. See Item 1A.
Risk Factors We are highly dependent on our intellectual property.
Competition
The markets we serve are highly competitive and characterized by ongoing technological
development and changing customer requirements. Significant competitive factors in our markets
include product performance, compatibility with adjacent products, price, quality and reliability
and level of customer service and support. We believe that we currently compete effectively with
respect to these factors, although we cannot assure that we will be able to compete effectively in
the future.
5
The markets in which we compete have seen an increase in global competition, especially
from Asian and European-based equipment vendors. We have several foreign and domestic competitors
for each of our product lines. Some of these competitors are larger and have greater resources than
us. Our ability to continue to compete successfully in these markets depends on our ability to make
timely introductions of system enhancements and new
products. We expect our competitors will continue to improve the design and performance of their
products and to introduce new products with competitive performance characteristics.
Operating Segment
We operate and manage our business of manufacturing, marketing and servicing components
and products for thin-film manufacturing processes as one segment. All segment financial
information required by SFAS No. 131 is found in Note 15 Foreign Operations and Major Customers in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Research and Development
The market for our products is characterized by ongoing technological changes. We believe
that continued and timely development of new highly differentiated products and enhancements to
existing products to support OEM requirements is necessary for us to maintain a competitive
position in the markets we serve Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our personnel and
financial resources to research and development projects and seek to maintain close relationships
with our customers and other industry leaders in order to remain responsive to their product
requirements. Research and development expenses were $50.4 million in 2007, $44.8 million in 2006
and $39.7 million in 2005, representing 13.1% of our sales in 2007, 12.2% of our sales in 2006 and
12.9% of our sales in 2005.
Number of Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we had a total of 1,611 employees. There is no union
representation of our employees, notwithstanding statutory organization rights applicable to our
employees in China, and we have never experienced an involuntary work stoppage. We consider our
employee relations to be good.
Effect of Environmental Laws
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, as well as
the environmental laws and regulations of the foreign federal and local jurisdictions in which we
have manufacturing facilities. We believe we are in material compliance with all such laws and
regulations.
Website Access
Our website address is www.advanced-energy.com. We make available, free of charge on our
website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K and all amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such reports
with, or furnishing them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Such reports are also
available at www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference
in, or otherwise part of, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any of our other filings with the SEC.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes or incorporates by reference forward-looking
statements within the meanings of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained or
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements. For example, statements relating to our
6
beliefs,
expectations, plans and projections are forward-looking statements as are statements that specified
actions, conditions or circumstances will continue or change. Forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the
inclusion of words such as believe, expect, plan, anticipate, estimate and similar words.
Some of the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are or reflect our
expectations or projections relating to:
|
|
|
Our future revenues; |
|
|
|
|
Our future gross profit; |
|
|
|
|
Reducing our operating breakeven point; |
|
|
|
|
Incremental profit above our breakeven point; |
|
|
|
|
Market acceptance of our products; |
|
|
|
|
Customer inventory levels, requirements and order levels; |
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses; |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
|
Sufficiency and availability of capital resources; |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring activities and expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
General global economic conditions. |
Our actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in our
forward-looking statements, because forward-looking statements by their nature are subject to risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could contribute to these differences or prove our forward-looking
statements, by hindsight, to be overly optimistic or unachievable include the factors described in
Item 1A. Risk Factors beginning on page 8. Other factors might also contribute to the differences
between our forward-looking statements and our actual results. We assume no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement or the reasons why our actual results might differ.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our
executive officers, their positions and their ages as of March 12, 2008 are as follows:
Dr. Hans Georg Betz, 61, has been our Chief Executive Officer and President since August 2005 and
has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2004. From August 2001 until he became our
Chief Executive Officer and President, Dr. Betz served as chief executive officer of West Steag
Partners GmbH, a German-based venture capital company focused on the high-technology industry. In
his over 30-year career in the electronics industry, Dr. Betz also has served as chief executive
officer of STEAG Electronic Systems AG and a managing director at Leybold AG. Dr. Betz currently
serves as a director of Mattson Technology, Inc., a publicly held supplier of advanced process
equipment used to manufacture semiconductors, and serves as a member of its compensation committee.
7
Lawrence D. Firestone, 49, joined us in August 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Mr. Firestone had served as the chief financial
officer, secretary and treasurer of Applied Films Corporation, a supplier of thin film deposition
equipment, since 1999. From 1996 to
1999, Mr. Firestone served as vice president and chief operating officer of Avalanche Industries, a
contract manufacturer of custom cables and harnesses.
Yuval Wasserman, 53, joined us in August 2007 as Executive Vice President of Sales, Marketing and
Service. Immediately prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wasserman had served as the president and
chief executive officer of Tevet Process Control Technologies, Inc., an integrated metrology
equipment provider, since 2002. In his 25 years in the semiconductor industry, Mr. Wasserman also
has held the positions of senior vice president for sales and marketing at Boxer Cross, a metrology
company; vice president and general manager of Fusion Systems, a plasma strip equipment
manufacturer and a division of Axcelis Technologies, Inc; and executive and senior management
positions in technology and marketing at AG Associates, a manufacturer of RTP processing equipment.
Mr. Wasserman started his career at National Semiconductor, where he held various process
engineering and management positions from 1983 to 1989.
Charles S. Rhoades, 47, joined us in September 2002 as Senior Vice President and General Manager of
Control Systems and Instrumentation. In November 2004 he was named Executive Vice President of
Products and Operations. On December 19, 2005, Mr. Rhoades was appointed as Chief Operating
Officer. From March 2000 to September 2002, Mr. Rhoades was Vice President, Corporate Development at Portera Systems. Prior to
Portera Systems, he was Managing Director of Product Development at Lam Research. Mr. Rhoades
tendered his resignation on December 31, 2007 with an agreement to continue his employment until
June 30, 2008.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The semiconductor, semiconductor capital equipment and flat panel display industries are highly
cyclical, which impacts our operating results.
Our business and operating results depend in significant part upon capital expenditures
by manufacturers of semiconductors and flat panel displays, which in turn depend upon current and
anticipated demand for their products. Historically, these industries have been highly cyclical,
with recurring periods of over-supply that have had a negative impact on the demand for capital
equipment used to manufacture their products.
During periods of declining demand, such as they are currently experiencing, our
customers typically reduce purchases of, and cancel orders for, our products and delay delivery of
their own products. We may incur significant charges as we seek to align our cost structure with
any such reduction in sales to these customers. In addition, we may not be able to respond
adequately or quickly to the declining demand by reducing our costs. We may also be required to
record significant reserves for excess and obsolete inventory as demand for our products changes.
Our inability to reduce costs and the charges resulting from other actions taken in response to
changes in demand for our products would adversely affect our business, financial condition and
operating results.
Our quarterly and annual operating results fluctuate significantly and are difficult to predict.
Our operating results may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which
are beyond our control and difficult to predict. These factors include:
|
|
|
Fluctuations in demand in the semiconductor, semiconductor capital
equipment and flat panel display industries and other industries in
which our customers operate; |
|
|
|
|
The timing and nature of orders placed by our customers; |
8
|
|
|
Seasonal variations in capital spending by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in our customers inventory management practices; |
|
|
|
|
Customer cancellation or postponement of previously placed orders; |
|
|
|
|
Pricing competition from our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
Customer requests for us to reduce prices, enhance features, improve
reliability, shorten delivery times and extend payment terms; |
|
|
|
|
Component shortages or allocations or other factors that result in
delays in manufacturing and sales or result in changes to our
inventory levels or cause us to substantially increase our spending on
inventory; |
|
|
|
|
The introduction of new products by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in macroeconomic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
Litigation, especially regarding intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations; at December 31, 2007, a 10%
change in exchange rates would have had an approximately 2% to 4%
impact on reported revenues and expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
Our estimates of the fair value of our auction rate securities and
expectations regarding our ability to liquidate such securities. |
We have transferred the production of substantially all of our product lines to our manufacturing
facility in Shenzhen, China, and may experience unforeseen difficulties and challenges with these
operations.
We have invested significant human and financial resources to establish our manufacturing
facility in Shenzhen, China. These investments were made with the goal of reducing our labor costs
by increasing our workforce in China and correspondingly decreasing our workforce in the United
States. We cannot predict with certainty the impact that this relatively new facility will have on
our operating results. We may incur unforeseen costs with respect to this facility and the related
workforce, including escalations of costs that could have an adverse impact on our operating
results.
We might not realize all of the intended benefits of transitioning our supply base to Asian
suppliers.
We are continuing our transition to purchasing a substantial portion of components for our
products from Asian suppliers to lower our materials costs and shipping expenses. These components
might require us to incur higher than anticipated testing or repairing costs, which would have an
adverse effect on our operating results. Customers, including major customers who have strict and
extensive requirements, might not accept our products if they contain these lower-priced
components. A delay or refusal by our customers to accept such products, as well as an inability
of our suppliers to meet our purchasing requirements, might require us to continue to purchase
higher-priced components from our existing suppliers or might cause us to lose sales to these
customers, which would have an adverse effect on our operating results.
A significant portion of our sales is concentrated among a few customers.
Our ten largest customers accounted for 61% of our sales in 2007, 63% of our sales in
2006 and 57% of our sales in 2005. Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted for 29%
of our sales in 2007, 30% of our sales in 2006 and 23% of our sales in 2005. Ulvac, Inc., our
largest customer in the flat panel display industry, accounted for 11% of our sales in 2005. With
the exceptions of Applied Materials and Ulvac, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of
our sales during 2007, 2006 or 2005. The loss of any of our significant customers or a material
reduction in any of their purchase orders could significantly harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
9
Our customers continually exert pressure on us to reduce our prices and extend
payment terms. Given the nature of our customer base and the highly competitive markets in which we
compete, we may be required to reduce
our prices or extend payment terms to remain competitive. We may not be able to reduce our expenses
in an amount sufficient to offset potential margin declines.
Raw material, part, component and subassembly shortages, exacerbated by our dependence on sole and
limited source suppliers, could affect our ability to manufacture products and systems and could
delay our shipments.
Our business depends on our ability to manufacture products that meet the rapidly
changing demands of our customers. Our ability to manufacture our products timely depends in part
on the timely delivery of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies from suppliers. We
rely on sole and limited source suppliers for some of our raw materials, parts, components and
subassemblies that are critical to the manufacturing of our products. This reliance involves
several potential risks, including the following:
|
|
|
Inability to obtain an adequate supply of required parts, components or subassemblies; |
|
|
|
|
Supply shortages if a sole or limited source provider ceases operations; |
|
|
|
|
Having to fund the operating losses of a sole or limited source provider; |
|
|
|
|
Reduced control over pricing and timing of delivery of raw materials and parts; components or subassemblies; |
|
|
|
|
Need to qualify alternative suppliers which could be time consuming and lead to delays in delivery of
products to our customers, as well as increased costs; and |
|
|
|
|
Inability of our suppliers to develop technologically advanced products to support our growth and
development of new products. |
If we are unable to qualify additional suppliers and manage relationships with our existing
and future suppliers successfully, if our suppliers experience financial difficulties including
bankruptcy or if our suppliers cannot meet our performance or quality specifications or timing
requirements, we may experience shortages, delays, or increased costs of raw materials, parts,
components or subassemblies. This in turn could limit our ability to manufacture and ship our
products, which could adversely and materially affect our business, financial condition and
operating results and relationships with our current and prospective customers.
We generally have no written long-term contracts with our customers requiring them to purchase any
specified quantities from us.
As is typical in the industries we serve, our sales are primarily made on a purchase
order basis, and we generally have no written long-term purchase commitments from our customers.
As a result, we are limited in our ability to predict the level of future sales or commitments from
our current customers, which may diminish our ability to allocate labor, materials and equipment in
the manufacturing process effectively. In addition, we may accumulate inventory in anticipation of
sales that do not materialize, resulting in excess and obsolete inventory write-offs.
If we are unable to adjust our business strategy successfully for some of our product lines to
reflect the increasing price sensitivity on the part of our customers, our business and financial
condition could be harmed.
Our business strategy for many of our product lines has been focused on product
performance and technology innovation to provide enhanced efficiencies and productivity. As a
result of recent economic conditions and changes in various markets that we serve, our customers
have experienced significant cost pressures and, as a result, we have observed increased price
sensitivity on the part of our customers. If competition for any of our product lines should come
to focus solely on price rather than on product performance and technology innovation, we will need
to adjust our business strategy and product offerings accordingly and, if we are unable to do so,
our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
10
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive.
We face substantial competition, primarily from established companies, some of which have
greater financial, marketing and technical resources than we do. We expect our competitors will
continue to develop new products in direct competition with ours, improve the design and
performance of their products and introduce new products with enhanced performance characteristics.
To remain competitive, we must improve and expand our products and product offerings. In
addition, we may need to maintain a high level of investment in research and development and expand
our sales and marketing efforts, particularly outside of the United States. We might not be able to
make the technological advances and investments necessary to remain competitive. Our inability to
improve and expand our products and product offerings would have an adverse affect on our sales and
results of operations.
Our competitive position could be weakened if we are unable to convince end users to specify that
our products be used in the equipment sold by our customers.
Semiconductor device and flat panel display manufacturers are end users of our products, but
not necessarily our customers. In some cases, these end users may direct equipment manufacturers
to use a specified suppliers product in their equipment at a particular facility. This occurs with
frequency in respect of mass flow controller products. Our success therefore, particularly in
respect of our MFCs, depends in part on our ability to have end users specify that our products be
used at their facilities. In addition, we may encounter difficulties in changing established
relationships of competitors that already have a large installed base of products within such
facilities.
Our products may suffer from defects or errors leading to damage or warranty claims
Our products use complex system designs and components that may contain errors or defects,
particularly when we incorporate new technology into our products or release new versions. While we
have never recalled a product, if any of our products are defective, we might be required to
redesign or recall those products or pay damages or warranty claims. Product defects could result
in substantial product liability. We maintain product liability insurance, but cannot be certain
that it is adequate or will remain available on acceptable terms. We accrue a warranty reserve for
estimated costs to provide warranty services, including the cost of technical support, product
repairs, and product replacement for units that cannot be repaired. Our estimate of costs to
fulfill our warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectation of future
conditions. To the extent we experience increased warranty claim activity or increased costs
associated with servicing those claims, our warranty accrual will increase, resulting in decreased
gross profit.
We must achieve design wins to retain our existing customers and to obtain new customers, although
design wins achieved do not necessarily result in substantial sales.
The constantly changing nature of semiconductor fabrication and flat panel display
technology causes equipment manufacturers to continually design new systems. We must work with
these manufacturers early in their design cycles to modify our equipment or design new equipment to
meet the requirements of their new systems. Manufacturers typically choose one or two vendors to
provide the components for use with the early system shipments. Selection as one of these vendors
is called a design win. It is critical that we achieve these design wins in order to retain
existing customers and to obtain new customers.
We believe that equipment manufacturers often select their suppliers based on factors
such as long-term relationships. Accordingly, we may have difficulty achieving design wins from
equipment manufacturers who are not currently our customers. In addition, we must compete for
design wins for new systems and products of our existing customers, including those with whom we
have had long-term relationships. Our efforts to achieve design
11
wins are time consuming and
expensive, and may not be successful. If we are not successful in achieving design
wins, our
business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely impacted.
Once a manufacturer chooses a component for use in a particular product, it is likely to
retain that component for
the life of that product. Our sales and growth could experience material and prolonged adverse
effects if we fail to achieve design wins. However, design wins do not always result in substantial
sales, as sales of our products are dependent upon our customers sales of their products.
We are subject to risks inherent in international operations.
Sales
to our customers outside the United States were approximately 46% in 2007, 42% in
2006 and 50% in 2005. Our success competing in international markets is subject to our ability to
manage various risks and difficulties, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
Our ability to effectively manage our employees at remote locations who are operating in different business
environments from the United States; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to develop relationships with suppliers and other local businesses; |
|
|
|
|
Compliance with product safety requirements and standards that are different from those of the United States; |
|
|
|
|
Variations and changes in laws applicable to our operations
in different jurisdictions, including enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights; |
|
|
|
|
Trade restrictions, political instability, disruptions in financial markets and deterioration of economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
Customs regulations and the import and export of goods; |
|
|
|
|
The ability to provide sufficient levels of technical support in different locations; |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain business licenses as may be needed in international locations to support expanded operations; |
|
|
|
|
Collecting past due accounts receivable from foreign customers; and |
|
|
|
|
Changes in tariffs, taxes and foreign currency exchange rates. |
Our ability to implement our business strategies, maintain market share and compete
successfully in international markets will be compromised if we are unable to manage these and
other international risks successfully.
Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations may lead to lower operating margins, or may cause
us to raise prices which could result in reduced sales.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our sales and results
of operations and we could experience losses with respect to our forward exchange contracts.
Unfavorable currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers which
could result in lower net sales by us to such customers. Alternatively, if we do not adjust the
prices for our products in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, our operating results
could be adversely affected. In addition, most sales made by our foreign subsidiaries are
denominated in the currency of the country in which these products are sold and the currency they
receive in payment for such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a result of
exchange rate fluctuations. We enter into forward exchange contracts and local currency purchased
options to reduce currency exposure arising from intercompany sales of inventory. However, we
cannot be certain that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against significant currency
fluctuations or that such efforts will not expose us to additional exchange rate risks which could
adversely affect our operating results.
12
Changes in the value of the Chinese yuan could impact the cost of our operation in Shenzhen, China.
The Chinese government is continually pressured by its trading partners to allow its
currency to float in a manner similar to other major currencies. The 2005 revaluation of the yuan
has not had a material impact on our operations. Any further change may impact our ability to
control the cost of our products in the world market. Specifically, the decision by the Chinese
government to allow the yuan to begin to float against the United States dollar could
significantly increase the labor and other costs incurred in the operation of our Shenzhen facility
and the cost of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies that we source in China, thereby
negatively affecting our financial condition and operating results.
We are highly dependent on our intellectual property.
Our success depends significantly on our proprietary technology. We attempt to protect
our intellectual property rights through patents and non-disclosure agreements; however, we might
not be able to protect our technology, and competitors might be able to develop similar technology
independently. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries might not afford our intellectual
property the same protections as do the laws of the United States. Our intellectual property is not
protected by patents in several countries in which we do business, and we have limited patent
protection in other countries, including China. The cost of applying for patents in foreign
countries and translating the applications into foreign languages requires us to select carefully
the inventions for which we apply for patent protection and the countries in which we seek such
protection. Generally, our efforts to obtain international patents have been concentrated in the
European Union and certain industrialized countries in Asia, including, Korea, Japan and Taiwan. If
we are unable to protect our intellectual property successfully, our business, financial condition
and operating results could be adversely affected.
China commercial law is relatively undeveloped compared to the commercial law in the
United States. Limited protection of intellectual property is available under Chinese law.
Consequently, manufacturing our products in China may subject us to an increased risk that
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy our products or otherwise obtain or use our intellectual
property. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to protect our intellectual property rights
effectively or have adequate legal recourse in the event that we encounter infringements of our
intellectual property in China.
We have been, and in the future may again be, involved in patent litigation. Patent litigation is
costly and could result in further restrictions on our ability to sell certain products or an
inability to prevent others from using technology we have developed.
Litigation may be necessary to enforce patents issued to us, to protect our trade secrets or
know-how, to defend ourselves against claimed infringement of the rights of others or to determine
the scope and validity of our proprietary rights or the proprietary rights of others. This type of
litigation often requires substantial management time and attention, as well as financial and other
resources.
We are and have been subject to patent litigation, which has required us to expend significant
resources for legal fees and other costs, as well as management time and attention. Patent
litigation can result in:
|
|
|
substantial costs in the form of legal fees, fines and royalty payments; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on our ability to sell certain products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to prevent others from using technology we have developed; and |
|
|
|
|
us needing to redesign products or seek alternative technologies. |
Any of these events could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
13
Our invested cash and marketable securities are subject to risks which may cause losses and affect
the liquidity of these investments.
As of December 31, 2007, we held approximately $51 million in auction rate securities,
classified as current assets on our balance sheet as management intends to continue to attempt to
sell these securities. Our auction rate
securities consist of investment grade municipal notes. In February 2008, liquidity issues in the
global credit markets caused auctions with respect to $23.7 million of our auction rate securities
to fail, because the amount of securities offered for sale exceeded the amount of bids. As a
result, the liquidity of our auction-rate securities has diminished. As of March 12, 2008, we held
approximately $40 million in auction rate securities. If the credit markets do not improve
sufficiently, or auctions on such securities otherwise continue to fail, we may be required to
record an impairment charge with respect to these investments.
Management intends to attempt to sell these securities at amounts
invested; however, it could take until
the final maturity of the underlying municipal notes, 28 years in some cases, to realize the
recorded value of these investments. If management determines that
such sales cannot occur in 2008, without significant loss, we may
classify these investments as long-term on our balance sheet.
We are subject to numerous governmental regulations.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations, including environmental
regulations and regulations relating to the design and operation of our products and control
systems. We might incur significant costs as we seek to ensure that our products meet safety and
emissions standards, many of which vary across the states and countries in which our products are
used. In the past, we have invested significant resources to redesign our products to comply with
these directives. Compliance with future regulations, directives and standards could require us to
modify or redesign some products, make capital expenditures or incur substantial costs. If we do
not comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards:
|
|
|
we could be subject to fines; |
|
|
|
|
our production or shipments could be suspended; or |
|
|
|
|
we could be prohibited from offering particular products in specified markets. |
Any inability to comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards
could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate for reasons over
which we have no control.
The stock market has from time to time experienced, and is likely to continue to
experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations. Prices of securities of technology companies
have been especially volatile and have often fluctuated for reasons that are unrelated to their
operating performance. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price
of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we were the subject
of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and resources.
Our Chairman of the Board owns a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock, which
could enable him to control our business and affairs and future sales of our common stock by our
Chairman of the Board may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
Douglas S. Schatz, our Chairman of the Board, beneficially owns approximately 21% of our
outstanding common stock as of March 12, 2008. This stockholding gives Mr. Schatz significant
voting power and influence. Depending on the number of shares that abstain or otherwise are not
voted on a particular matter, Mr. Schatz may be able to elect all of the members of our board of
directors and to control our business affairs for the foreseeable future in a manner with which our
other stockholders may not agree. In addition, the sale of a substantial amount of the shares
beneficially owned by him could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. The trust
through which Mr. Schatz beneficially owns a significant number of shares has entered into a
written trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which
provides for the sale of up to 900,000 shares of common stock if certain price targets and other
conditions are met.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Information concerning our principal properties at December 31, 2007 is set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Type |
|
Principal Use |
|
Sq. Footage |
|
Ownership |
San Jose, CA
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales, Service
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Fort Collins, CO
|
|
Office, plant
|
|
Headquarters,
Research and development,
Manufacturing, Distribution
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Austin, TX
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Service
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Dallas, TX
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Service
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Vancouver, WA
|
|
Office, plant
|
|
Research and development,
Manufacturing, Distribution
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Shanghai, China
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
Leased |
Shenzhen, China
|
|
Office, plant
|
|
Manufacturing, Distribution
|
|
|
131,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Bicester, England
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Filderstadt, Germany
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales, Service
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Hachioji, Japan
|
|
Office, plant
|
|
Research and development,
Manufacturing, Distribution
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
Owned |
Sungnam City, South Korea
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales, Service
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
Owned |
Hsinchu, Taiwan
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales, Service
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Taipei, Taiwan
|
|
Office
|
|
Distribution, Sales, Service
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Sendai-shi Miyagi-ken, Japan
|
|
Office
|
|
Sales and Service
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Leased |
Osaka, Japan
|
|
Office
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
Leased |
Hiroshima, Japan
|
|
Office
|
|
Service
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Leased |
Kumamoto-ken, Japan
|
|
Office
|
|
Service
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
Leased |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in disputes and legal actions from time to time in the ordinary course of our
business. On November 5, 2007, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Colorado by Xantrex Technology, Inc., alleging various breaches of confidence and interference
with contractual duties in connection with the Companys hiring of a former employee of Xantrex.
The Company believes the allegations to be unfounded and will defend itself vigorously against the
claims.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol AEIS. At
March 12, 2008, the number of common stockholders of record was 593, and the closing sale price of
our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that day was $13.38 per share.
15
The table below shows the range of high and low closing sale prices for the common stock
as quoted (without retail markup or markdown and without commissions) on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
21.46 |
|
|
$ |
16.69 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
$ |
12.06 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
25.68 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.08 |
|
|
$ |
12.39 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
24.12 |
|
|
$ |
13.93 |
|
|
$ |
17.12 |
|
|
$ |
11.63 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
17.31 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
$ |
18.87 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since we terminated
our election to be treated as an S-corporation for tax purposes, effective January 1, 1994. We
currently intend to retain all future earnings to finance our business and do not anticipate paying
cash or other dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, our revolving
credit facility prohibits the declaration or payment of any cash dividends on our common stock.
On December 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75
million of the Companys common stock. We may repurchase shares in the open market, through
privately negotiated transactions, block trades, Rule 10b5-1 plans or other available means. In
February 2008, we began repurchasing shares pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. There is no minimum
number of shares to be repurchased, and we may discontinue repurchasing shares at any time. Our
repurchases of shares may depend upon the availability of cash, general economic and stock market
conditions and other considerations.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated statement of operations data and the related consolidated
balance sheet data were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements. The
information below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read
in conjunction with Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of Part II of this Form 10-K in order to understand more fully the factors
that may affect the comparability of the information presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
$ |
380,537 |
|
|
$ |
253,536 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
162,809 |
|
|
|
175,218 |
|
|
|
117,081 |
|
|
|
114,626 |
|
|
|
84,319 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
116,869 |
|
|
|
107,829 |
|
|
|
101,107 |
|
|
|
118,093 |
|
|
|
108,746 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
45,940 |
|
|
|
67,389 |
|
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
(24,427 |
) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
87,184 |
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
(14,670 |
) |
|
|
(45,536 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
88,322 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
(12,747 |
) |
|
|
(44,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per
share diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.41 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
Diluted weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
45,704 |
|
|
|
45,265 |
|
|
|
37,434 |
|
|
|
32,649 |
|
|
|
32,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
|
$ |
205,264 |
|
|
$ |
144,218 |
|
|
$ |
59,685 |
|
|
$ |
107,982 |
|
|
$ |
134,892 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
305,955 |
|
|
|
247,798 |
|
|
|
143,633 |
|
|
|
206,915 |
|
|
|
205,835 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
459,028 |
|
|
|
411,903 |
|
|
|
310,117 |
|
|
|
394,407 |
|
|
|
414,731 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
196,123 |
|
|
|
202,468 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
407,061 |
|
|
|
355,790 |
|
|
|
257,430 |
|
|
|
144,978 |
|
|
|
151,834 |
|
16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute forward-looking statements.
See BusinessSpecial Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in Item 1 of this report for
additional factors relating to such statements, and see Risk
Factors beginning on page 8 for a
discussion of certain risks applicable to our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Business Overview and Presentation
We develop, manufacture and sell innovative power and control technologies that enable
high-growth, plasma-based thin-film manufacturing processes worldwide, including semiconductors,
flat panel displays, data storage products, solar cells, architectural glass, and other advanced
product applications. We also develop, manufacture and sell grid-connect inverters for the solar
energy market.
Our installed base generates recurring revenue opportunities as we sell spare parts, repair
services and field upgrades worldwide through our customer service and technical support
organization.
We provide solutions to a diverse range of markets and geographic regions with the
semiconductor capital market being our largest market. Sales to customers in the semiconductor
capital equipment industry comprised 69% of our sales in both 2006 and 2007, and 63% of our sales
in 2005. Other markets we sell to include flat panel display, data storage, architectural glass,
solar inverter and other industrial thin-film manufacturing.
Our analysis presented below is organized to provide the information we believe will be
instructive for understanding the relevant trends going forward. However, this discussion should be
read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report, including
the notes thereto.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended 2007, 2006 and
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
|
Percentage change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
$ |
(26,043 |
) |
|
$ |
85,260 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
162,809 |
|
|
|
175,218 |
|
|
|
117,081 |
|
|
|
(12,409 |
) |
|
|
58,137 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
50,393 |
|
|
|
44,848 |
|
|
|
39,720 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
63,189 |
|
|
|
62,870 |
|
|
|
55,681 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
7,189 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
nm |
|
nm |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
(2,595 |
) |
|
nm |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
116,869 |
|
|
|
107,829 |
|
|
|
101,107 |
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
6,722 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
45,940 |
|
|
|
67,389 |
|
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
|
(21,449 |
) |
|
|
51,415 |
|
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
(7,479 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
12,156 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
50,750 |
|
|
|
72,066 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
|
(21,316 |
) |
|
|
63,571 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
nm |
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
|
Percentage change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (Provision) for income taxes |
|
|
(16,389 |
) |
|
|
15,118 |
|
|
|
(4,873 |
) |
|
|
(31,507) |
|
|
|
19,991 |
|
|
|
nm |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
87,184 |
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
(52,823 |
) |
|
|
83,562 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
9,195 |
|
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
($8,057 |
) |
|
nm |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,361 |
|
|
$ |
88,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
|
$ |
(53,961 |
) |
|
$ |
75,505 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nmpercentages greater than 200% and comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero
values are considered not meaningful. |
SALES
The following tables summarize annual net sales, and percentages of net sales, by customer
type for each of the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
|
Percentage change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor capital equipment |
|
$ |
262,740 |
|
|
$ |
283,470 |
|
|
$ |
205,322 |
|
|
$ |
(20,730 |
) |
|
$ |
78,148 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
38 |
% |
Non-semiconductor equipment |
|
|
121,959 |
|
|
|
127,272 |
|
|
|
120,160 |
|
|
|
(5,313 |
) |
|
|
7,112 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
$ |
(26,043 |
) |
|
$ |
85,260 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Semiconductor capital equipment |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
Non-semiconductor equipment |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize annual net sales, and percentages of net sales, by geographic
region for each of the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005. The following amounts do not contemplate
where our customers may subsequently transfer our products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
2007 v |
|
|
2006 v |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
207,265 |
|
|
$ |
238,468 |
|
|
$ |
163,657 |
|
|
$ |
(31,203 |
) |
|
$ |
74,811 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
46 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
42,051 |
|
|
|
41,760 |
|
|
|
34,228 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Asia |
|
|
135,383 |
|
|
|
130,514 |
|
|
|
127,597 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Total sales |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
$ |
(26,043 |
) |
|
$ |
85,260 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
United States |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Asia |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in total sales from 2006 to 2007 and the increase in total sales from 2005 to
2006 principally reflect fluctuations in demand in the semiconductor capital equipment industry.
The semiconductor capital equipment industry is highly cyclical and is impacted by changes in the
macroeconomic environment, changes in semiconductor supply and demand and rapid technological
advances in both semiconductor devices and wafer fabrication processes. Our sales to our largest
semiconductor capital equipment customers represented the majority of the fluctuating sales volume.
18
Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted for 29% of our sales in 2007, 30% of
our sales in 2006 and 23% of our sales in 2005. Ulvac, Inc., our largest customer in the flat
panel display industry, accounted for 11% of our sales in 2005. With the exceptions of Applied
Materials and Ulvac, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales during 2007, 2006
or 2005.
GROSS PROFIT
Our
gross margin was 42.3% in 2007, 42.7% in 2006 and 36.0% in 2005. The decrease in our gross
margin from 2006 to 2007 was primarily attributable to lower revenues and costs incurred in
transitioning manufacturing from Stolberg, Germany to Shenzhen, China and an additional charge of
$2.2 million to cost of goods sold related to a change in estimates of warranty expenses for two
products. The improvement in our gross margin from 2005 to 2006 was attributable to increased
volume of production and advanced manufacturing processes in our China manufacturing facility,
lower freight costs, increased utilization of local Asian suppliers, design-led cost reductions and
the increase in sales.
OPERATING EXPENSES
The following table summarizes our operating expenses as a percentage of sales for the years ended
2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
% of Sales |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
50,393 |
|
|
$ |
44,848 |
|
|
$ |
39,720 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
63,189 |
|
|
|
62,870 |
|
|
|
55,681 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
116,869 |
|
|
$ |
107,829 |
|
|
$ |
101,107 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The market for our products is characterized by ongoing technological changes. We believe that
continued and timely development of new, highly differentiated products and enhancements to our
existing products in support of customer requirements is necessary for us to maintain a competitive
position in the markets we serve. Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our personnel and
financial resources to research and development projects and seek to maintain close relationships
with our customers and other industry leaders in order to remain responsive to their product
requirements. We believe that the continued investment in research and development and ongoing
development of new products are essential to the expansion of our markets, and expect to continue
to make significant investments in research and development activities. All of our research and
development costs have been expensed as incurred.
The increase in our research and development expenses from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to
increased compensation expense related to development of new and existing platforms to support
business growth, such as the solar inverter, Solaron. The increase in our research and
development expenses from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to increased compensation and non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense of $1 million as a result of our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R),
additional research projects in response to customer requests and costs incurred to support the
development of new products and enhancement of existing products.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Our selling expenses support domestic and international sales and marketing activities that
include personnel, trade shows, advertising, third-party sales representative commissions, and
other selling and marketing activities.
19
Our general and administrative expenses support our worldwide corporate, legal, tax, financial,
governance, administrative, information systems and human resource functions in addition to our
general management.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense from 2006 to 2007 remained flat as
increases in audit, legal and compensation costs were offset by decreases in insurance expense,
property tax expense and depreciation. The increase from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to
increased compensation expense, increased commissions, and non-cash stock-based compensation
expense of $1.5 million as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.
LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
On October 3, 2005, we executed a settlement agreement with MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS),
resolving all pending claims worldwide relating to our Xstream With Active Matching Network
reactive gas generator products. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we paid MKS $3.0 million in
cash. We also stipulated to a final judgment of infringement and an injunction prohibiting us from
making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the United States, or any country in
which a counterpart patent exists, our Xstream products and all other toroidal plasma generator
products, except as permitted under the settlement agreement. Sales of these products have
accounted for less than 5% of our total sales each year since introduction of the products.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
On March 2, 2007, we announced the closure of our manufacturing, distribution and research and
development facility located in Stolberg, Germany. Related to this manufacturing transition, we
recorded restructuring charges of $3.5 million in 2007, associated with employee
separation costs and the write-down
of certain real and personal property located at this facility to
estimated fair value. On October 2, 2007, we completed the sale of assets related
to our LPPA product line for $2.2 million and recorded the net gain on the sale of $200,000 as a
credit to the restructuring charge.
At the end of 2002, we announced major changes in our operations, which we began implementing
in 2003. These included establishing the manufacturing location in China; consolidating worldwide
sales forces; a move to lower-cost Asian suppliers; and the closure or sale of certain facilities.
We recorded restructuring charges associated with these changes of $111,000 in 2006 and $2.7
million in 2005.
In the first quarter of 2008, we restructured a portion of our general and administrative
operations. In conjunction with this, we will record approximately $1.1 million in restructuring
charges in the first quarter of 2008.
IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill as of the end of each fiscal year.
Additionally, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our goodwill or
other intangible assets may not be recoverable, we perform tests for impairment of these assets and
record impairment charges, as necessary. Such events or circumstances include downturns or
anticipated downturns in the industries in which we serve, changes in customer technology
requirements, and other changes in circumstances affecting the underlying value of the recorded
asset.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income and expense, foreign
exchange gains and losses and other miscellaneous gains, losses, income and expense items.
20
Income from investments and cash was approximately $6.3 million in 2007, $3.7 million in 2006
and $2.9 million in 2005. The increase in income from investments was primarily due to our higher
level of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities generated from operations and net
proceeds from our public offering of 11.5 million shares in 2005. This was offset in 2005 by our
use of those proceeds to redeem our convertible subordinated notes in September 2005.
Interest expense was approximately $77,000 in 2007, $413,000 in 2006 and $8.2 million in 2005.
In 2007 and 2006, interest expense consisted principally of borrowings under capital lease
facilities and senior debt, and amortization of our deferred debt issuance costs. Interest expense
for 2005 also includes our convertible subordinated notes, which were redeemed in September 2005.
Our foreign subsidiaries sales are primarily denominated in currencies other than the United
States dollar. We recorded net foreign currency loss of
$1.8 million in 2007 and $206,000 in 2006, and a
net foreign currency gain of $243,000 in 2005. The loss in 2007 is primarily due to a net charge
of $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2007 related to a foreign exchange loss during the quarter,
as the Japanese yen and euro strengthened relative to the U.S. dollar.
Debt extinguishment expense of $3.2 million in 2005 resulted from the redemption of our
convertible subordinated notes with a total principal balance of $187.7 million. The expense of
$3.2 million is comprised of $2.1 million for redemption premium and $1.1 million for the write-off
of deferred debt issuance costs.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized for temporary
differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities, computed
at the expected tax rates for the periods in which the assets or liabilities will be realized, as
well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In 2003,
we began recording valuation allowances against certain of our United States and foreign net
deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where we had incurred significant losses. Given such
experience, prior to December 31, 2006, management could not conclude that it was more likely than
not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized. Based on our 2005 and 2006 operating
results, our management, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, evaluated the recoverability of its net
deferred tax assets and concluded that it was more likely than not that the majority of net
deferred tax assets would be realized. The reduction in the valuation allowance was $39.3 million
for the entire 2006 year. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income during the period in which those difference become deductible,
the timing and amount of which is uncertain. We assess the recoverability of our net deferred tax
assets on a quarterly basis. If we determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize
a portion or all of our remaining net deferred tax assets, some portion or all of the valuation
allowance will be reversed with a corresponding reduction in income tax expense in such period.
The income tax expense of $16.4 million in 2007 represents an effective tax rate on income
from continuing operations of 32%. The income tax benefit of $15.1 million in 2006 represents an
effective tax rate on income from continuing operations of (21)%. This negative rate includes the
impact of the reversal of the valuation allowance discussed above. The income tax provision of
$4.9 million in 2005 represents an effective tax rate on income from continuing operations of 57%,
due to taxable income earned in certain foreign jurisdictions. The Companys income from
discontinued operations earned in prior periods was earned in the United States. No provision for
income taxes is attributed to these discontinued operations, due to the reversal of valuation
allowances against certain deferred tax assets in the United States that existed in those periods,
including those generated by net operating losses, that offset the income from discontinued
operations.
21
Approximately $5.3 million of net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 related to certain
U.S. net operating losses that are subject to limitations under the US tax code. These assets
continue to have a full valuation allowance as management could not conclude that it was more
likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized.
When recording acquisitions, we have recorded valuation allowances due to the uncertainty
related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at the acquisition dates. The
amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if
estimates of future taxable income are changed. At December 31, 2006, approximately $2.9 million of
the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets obtained through acquisition. Any reversals
of valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting will be reflected as a reduction of
goodwill in the period of reversal. For the year ended December 31, 2006, $3.7 million of valuation
allowances, representing 100% of the valuation allowances established in purchase accounting, were
reversed with a corresponding reduction in goodwill. There are no further adjustments related to
these items to be booked in the current or future periods. Please refer to Note 12 Income Taxes
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding income taxes.
We adopted the provisions of FIN48 as of January 1, 2007. Upon adoption, the Company increased
the long-term liability associated with uncertain tax positions by approximately $6 million and
also increased the long-term receivable by approximately $5 million consisting of offsetting tax
benefits. The balance of $1 million is an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on
January 1, 2007. If the tax position reverses, the net $1 million will affect our effective tax
rate. There have been no significant changes to these amounts during the year ended December 31,
2007.
The tax years 2003 through 2007 remain open to examination by the United States taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject. The foreign taxing jurisdictions have open tax years from
2001 through 2007. In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. This policy did not
change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. We did not have any accrued interest or penalties at
December 31, 2007. We do not anticipate a material change to the amount of unrecognized tax
positions within the next 12 months.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing
authorities could materially differ from our accrued positions as a result of uncertain and complex
application of tax regulations. Additionally, the recognition and measurement of certain tax
benefits includes estimates and judgment by management and inherently includes subjectivity.
Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in
the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise
resolved.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income from discontinued operations was $1.1 million in 2006 and $9.2 million in 2005. In
2005, we sold the assets of our EMCO product line and our IKOR product line, as they were not
critical to our core operations. We recognized a gain on the sale of the EMCO product line of $2.9
million and a gain on the sale of the IKOR product line of $5.0 million. In the second quarter of
2006, $138,000 held in escrow relating to the EMCO product line was released and in the fourth
quarter of 2006, $1.0 million held in escrow relating to the IKOR product line was released as
various contingencies were resolved. These amounts were recorded as gains on the sale of
discontinued assets.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following tables present unaudited quarterly results in dollars and as a percentage of
sales for each of the
22
eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2007. We believe that all necessary adjustments
have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. Due to
the volatility of the industries in which our customers operate the operating results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
93,950 |
|
|
$ |
104,571 |
|
|
$ |
107,688 |
|
|
$ |
104,533 |
|
|
$ |
107,323 |
|
|
$ |
103,049 |
|
|
$ |
90,491 |
|
|
$ |
83,836 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
38,550 |
|
|
|
44,760 |
|
|
|
47,014 |
|
|
|
44,894 |
|
|
|
48,309 |
|
|
|
44,955 |
|
|
|
36,726 |
|
|
|
32,819 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,180 |
|
|
|
19,231 |
|
|
|
18,329 |
|
|
|
16,649 |
|
|
|
17,940 |
|
|
|
16,270 |
|
|
|
7,495 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
|
12,761 |
|
|
|
18,025 |
|
|
|
16,992 |
|
|
|
39,406 |
|
|
|
12,671 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,761 |
|
|
$ |
18,163 |
|
|
$ |
16,992 |
|
|
$ |
40,406 |
|
|
$ |
12,671 |
|
|
$ |
11,667 |
|
|
$ |
5,856 |
|
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
Percentage of Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
39.1 |
% |
Income from operations |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Income from continuing
operations |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Income from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
38.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2007, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of cash, cash equivalents
of $94.6 million and marketable securities of $110.7 million. Included in our marketable
securities as of December 31, 2007 was approximately $51 million in auction rate securities.
Subsequent to December 31, 2007, we sold approximately $11 million in municipal auction rate
securities. However, beginning in February 2008, we experienced difficulty in selling additional
securities due to the failure of the auction mechanism which provides liquidity to these
securities. The securities for which auctions have failed will continue to accrue interest and be
auctioned every 35 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities, or they
mature. Accordingly, there may be no effective mechanism for selling these securities and we may
own long-term investments. As of March 12, 2008, the Company had approximately $40 million of
auction rate securities and continued deterioration in the credit and equity markets, continued
failed auctions or the lack of a developing secondary market may potentially cause impairment in
the value of these securities or negatively impact our ability to liquidate these securities.
During 2007, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $61.1 million, or
42.3%, from $144.2 million at December 31, 2006, primarily due to cash generated from our
operations.
23
Operating activities provided cash of $61.8 million in 2007, $88.3 million in 2006, and $36.1
million in 2005. The increase in cash was primarily due to cash generated from operations partially
offset by increased inventory.
Investing activities used cash of $30.6 million in 2007 and $83.1 million in 2006, and
provided cash of $67.0 million in 2005. In 2007, we purchased $112.4 million and sold $88.5
million in marketable securities, as compared to the purchase of $79.4 million of marketable
securities in 2006, and the purchases of $87.2 million and sales of $151.7 million of marketable
securities used to redeem a portion of the convertible subordinated notes in 2005. Capital
expenditures were $8.9 million in 2007, $6.1 million in 2006, and $10.8 million in 2005. Cash
provided by investing activities in 2005 also reflects $8.9 million received on the sale of our
IKOR product line and $3.9 million on the sale of our EMCO product line.
With the significant capital expenditures related to our investment in our manufacturing
operations as well as our information technology infrastructure, we expect to increase our capital
expenditures in 2008 to approximately $11.9 million. Our planned level of capital expenditures is
subject to frequent revisions as our business experiences sudden changes. In addition, changes in
foreign currency exchange rates may significantly impact our capital expenditures in a particular
period.
Investing cash flows experience significant fluctuations from year to year as we buy and sell
marketable securities, which we convert to cash to fund strategic investments and our current
operations, and as we transfer cash into marketable securities when we attain levels of cash that
are greater than needed for current operations.
Financing activities provided cash of $4.8 million in 2007, primarily due to proceeds from the
exercise of stock options. Financing activities used cash of $741,000 in 2006, due primarily to
$4.0 million in payments on our senior borrowings and capital lease obligations offset by the
proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $2.9 million, as compared to $86.0 million in 2005,
primarily due to the redemption of our convertible subordinated notes offset in part by our public
offering of common stock. During the third quarter of 2005, we raised $105.5 million in net
proceeds from a public offering of 11.5 million shares of common stock. With these proceeds we
fully redeemed the 5.25% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2006. This redemption
consisted of a $66.2 million principal payment, $883,000 for redemption premium, and $1.1 million
for interest through the redemption dates. After the redemption of the 5.25% convertible
subordinate notes, proceeds of approximately $37.3 million remained. These proceeds together with
approximately $88.9 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were used to redeem
the 5.0% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006. This redemption consisted of a
$121.5 million principal payment, $1.2 million for redemption premium, and $3.5 million for
interest through the redemption dates.
We expect our financing activities to continue to fluctuate in the future. Our financing
payments may also increase in the future if we enter into additional capital lease obligations or
utilize our line of credit. A significant portion of these obligations are held in countries other
than the United States; therefore, future foreign currency fluctuations, especially between the
U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen, could cause significant fluctuations in our estimated payment
obligations.
We
currently have a $25 million secured revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July 5,
2008. Any advances under our amended credit facility will bear interest at the prime rate (6% at
March 12, 2008) minus 1%. No amounts are currently outstanding under this credit facility.
On December 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of
the Companys common stock. Purchases under the program may be made from time-to-time in the open
market, through privately negotiated transactions, through block trades, Rule 10b5-1 trading plans
or other available means. There is no minimum number of shares to be repurchased under the program
and the program may be discontinued at any time. Purchases under the program will depend upon the
availability of cash, as well as prevailing general economic and stock market conditions.
24
We believe that our working capital, together with cash anticipated to be generated by
operations and our line of credit will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated liquidity
requirements for the next twelve months.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The
following table sets forth our future payments due under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (In thousands) |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
Operating lease
obligations |
|
$ |
5,446 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
|
$ |
20,590 |
|
Non-cancelable purchase
obligations |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Severance obligation |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
As
of December 31, 2007, we have $5.8 million in uncertain tax positions, net of federal
benefit. Because of the uncertainty of the amounts to be ultimately paid as well as the timing of
such payments, these liabilities are not reflected in the contractual obligations table.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The above discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In preparing our consolidated
financial statements, we must make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. We have evaluated the accounting policies used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related notes under Part II, Item 8 of
this Form 10-K and believe that our accounting policies are reasonable and appropriate. We believe
that the following critical accounting policies, among others, are most critical as they relate to
our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
REVENUE RECOGNITION Most of the Companys product revenue is recognized upon shipment of
the Companys products, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed and
collectibility is reasonably assured. The remainder of the Companys product revenue is recognized
upon receipt of the products by the customer, at which time title passes to the customer, the price
is fixed and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues from contracts that contain specific
customer acceptance provisions are deferred until customer acceptance occurs. Generally, the
Company does not have obligations to its customers after its products are shipped under standard
shipping terms, after its products are received by customers under destination terms, and after the
products are accepted by customers under contractual acceptance provisions, other than pursuant to
warranty obligations. In limited instances, the Company provides installation of its products. In
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 00-21 Accounting for Revenue Arrangements With
Multiple Deliverables, the Company allocates revenue based on the fair value of the delivered
item, generally the product, and the undelivered item, installation, based on their respective fair
values. Revenue related to the undelivered item is deferred until the services have been completed.
In certain instances, the Company requires its customers to pay for a portion or all of their
purchases prior to the Company building or shipping these products. Cash payments received prior to
shipment are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets, and then recognized as revenue as
25
appropriate based upon the transfer of title of the products. The Company does not offer price
protection to customers or allow returns, unless covered by our normal policy for repair of
defective products.
WARRANTY POLICY We offer warranty coverage for our products for periods typically ranging
from 12 to 24 months after shipment. We estimate the anticipated costs of repairing products under
warranty based on the historical or expected cost of the repairs and expected failure rates. The
assumptions used to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated quarterly, at a minimum, in light of
actual experience and, when appropriate, the accruals or the accrual percentage is adjusted based
on specific estimates of project repair costs and quantity of product returns. Our determination of
the appropriate level of warranty accrual is based on estimates of the percentage of units affected
and the repair costs. Estimated warranty costs are recorded at the time of sale of the related
product, and are recorded within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations.
EXCESS AND OBSOLETE INVENTORY Inventory is written down or written off when it becomes
obsolete, generally due to engineering changes to a product or discontinuance of a product line, or
when it is deemed excess. Judgment by management is necessary in estimating the net realizable
value of inventory based primarily upon forecasts of product demand. Charges for excess and
obsolete inventory are recorded, as necessary, within cost of sales in the consolidated statement
of operations.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R) to account for its stock plans and employee stock purchase plan, which requires the
recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation in the statement of income. The fair
value of stock options and purchase rights pursuant to the employee stock purchase plan is
estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This model requires the input of highly
subjective assumptions, including expected life of the award, forfeiture rate and expected stock
price volatility. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based upon the Companys
closing stock price on the grant date. The fair value of stock-based awards expected to vest is
amortized over the requisite service period, typically the vesting period, of the award on a
straight-line basis.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES From time to time we are involved in disputes and legal
actions arising in the normal course of our business (see Item 3 within Part I and Note 14 within
Part II, Item 8). While we currently believe that the amount of any ultimate loss would not be
material to our financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to
predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate loss could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position or reported results of operations in a particular quarter. An unfavorable
decision, particularly in patent litigation, could require material changes in production processes
and products or result in our inability to ship products or components found to have violated
third-party patent rights. We accrue loss contingencies in connection with our commitments and
contingencies, including litigation, when it is probable that a loss has occurred or will occur and
the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
INCOME TAXES We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized for
temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and
liabilities, computed at the tax rates expected in the period that the assets or liabilities are
realized, as well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. We assess the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
Our assessment includes a number of factors, including historical results and income projections
for each jurisdiction. If we determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize a
portion or all of our remaining net deferred tax assets, some portion or all of the valuation
allowance will be reversed with a corresponding reduction in income tax expense in such period. We
adopted the provision of FIN 48 (FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48)) as of January 1, 2007.
26
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the fair
market value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is
not amortized. We
use a two-step approach to assess our goodwill annually, or more frequently, if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. In step 1 of the assessment the Company
compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying value of the reporting unit to
determine if an impairment of goodwill is indicated. The estimated fair value is based on market
capitalization, as complemented by a discounted cash flow analysis. If no impairment is indicated
in Step 1 no additional analysis is performed. Should an impairment be indicated the Company would
determine any loss in Step 2 by comparing the enterprises implied fair value of goodwill to the
carrying amount of goodwill.
Finite-lived intangible assets continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate
that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
See
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for details of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected
impact on our financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment
portfolio and long-term debt obligations. We generally place our investments with high-credit
quality issuers and by policy are averse to principal loss and seek to protect and preserve our
invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. As of December 31,
2007, our investments in marketable securities consisted primarily of commercial paper, municipal
bonds, auction rate securities and notes and institutional money markets. With the exception due to
market conditions of the auction rate securities, these securities are highly liquid. Earnings on
our marketable securities are typically invested into similar securities. We believe that a 10%
decrease in average interest rates on these instruments would not have a material effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We transact business in various foreign countries. Our primary foreign currency cash flows are
generated in countries in Asia and Europe. It is highly uncertain how currency exchange rates will
fluctuate in the future. We enter into various foreign currency forward exchange contracts to
mitigate risk of currency fluctuations in the British pound, European euro, Japanese yen, Taiwanese
dollar, South Korean won and Chinese yuan. The notional amount of our foreign currency contracts at
December 31, 2007 was $10.1 million. The potential fair value loss for a hypothetical 10% adverse
change in foreign currency exchange rates at December 31, 2007, would be approximately $2.0
million, which would be essentially offset by corresponding gains related to the underlying assets.
At December 31, 2007 we held foreign currency forward exchange contracts, maturing through January
2008, primarily
27
to purchase U.S. dollars and sell various foreign currencies. The following table summarizes our
outstanding contracts as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Amounts |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Purchase contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound contract |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
South Korean won contract |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Taiwanese dollar contract |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate Securities Risk
We face market risk exposure associated with our investments in auction rate securities. As
of December 31, 2007, we held approximately $51 million in auction rate securities. Subsequent to
December 31, 2007, we sold approximately $11 million in municipal auction rate securities.
However, starting in February 2008, we experienced difficulty in selling additional securities due
to the failure of the auction mechanism which provides liquidity to these securities. The
securities for which auctions have failed will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned every
35 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities, or they mature. Accordingly,
there may be no effective mechanism for selling these securities at face value, however, we intend
to continue to attempt to sell our auction rate securities without a loss in principal and thus
these securities are classified as short-term investments. As of March 12, 2008, the Company had
approximately $40 million of auction rate securities and continued deterioration in the credit and
equity markets, continued failed auctions or the lack of a developing secondary market may
potentially cause impairment in the value of these securities or negatively impact our ability to
liquidate these securities.
28
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
29
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (a
Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (together the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits of
the basic financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index
appearing under Item 8. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. As
discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 17, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 17, 2008
30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of
Directors and Stockholders
of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
We have audited Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries
(together the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based
on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in
the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under
Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
31
In our opinion, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated March 17, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 17, 2008
32
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
94,588 |
|
|
$ |
58,240 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
110,676 |
|
|
|
85,978 |
|
Accounts receivable trade, net |
|
|
61,545 |
|
|
|
71,956 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
50,532 |
|
|
|
52,778 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
23,696 |
|
|
|
24,434 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
7,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
347,969 |
|
|
|
300,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
30,912 |
|
|
|
33,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other |
|
|
7,045 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
61,406 |
|
|
|
58,679 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
6,905 |
|
Customer service equipment, net |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
459,028 |
|
|
$ |
411,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
33
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
16,310 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
11,945 |
|
|
|
16,899 |
|
Accrued warranty expense |
|
|
8,812 |
|
|
|
7,845 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
42,014 |
|
|
|
52,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases, net of current portion |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
Uncertain tax positions |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
51,967 |
|
|
|
56,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; 45,288 and 44,855 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
267,205 |
|
|
|
258,688 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
121,745 |
|
|
|
88,344 |
|
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments, net |
|
|
18,066 |
|
|
|
8,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
407,061 |
|
|
|
355,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
459,028 |
|
|
$ |
411,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
34
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
SALES |
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
COST OF SALES |
|
|
221,890 |
|
|
|
235,524 |
|
|
|
208,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
162,809 |
|
|
|
175,218 |
|
|
|
117,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
50,393 |
|
|
|
44,848 |
|
|
|
39,720 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
63,189 |
|
|
|
62,870 |
|
|
|
55,681 |
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
116,869 |
|
|
|
107,829 |
|
|
|
101,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
45,940 |
|
|
|
67,389 |
|
|
|
15,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
(8,171 |
) |
Foreign currency (loss) gain |
|
|
(1,773 |
) |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
243 |
|
Debt extinguishment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,180 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net |
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
(7,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
50,750 |
|
|
|
72,066 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(16,389 |
) |
|
|
15,118 |
|
|
|
(4,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
87,184 |
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
7,855 |
|
Results of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
9,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
34,361 |
|
|
$ |
88,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
45,156 |
|
|
|
44,721 |
|
|
|
37,084 |
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
45,704 |
|
|
|
45,265 |
|
|
|
37,434 |
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
35
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
(Loss) Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
32,760 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
144,500 |
|
|
$ |
(12,795 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,240 |
|
|
$ |
144,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options for cash |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
Sale of common stock through public
offering |
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
105,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,545 |
|
Sale of common stock through employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
Stock-based compensation and
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign
currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,539 |
) |
|
|
(8,539 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for amounts
included in net loss related to sales of
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
(882 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
44,500 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
253,675 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(1,290 |
) |
|
$ |
4,978 |
|
|
$ |
257,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options for cash |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Sale of
common stock through employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock and stock-
based compensation and
amortization |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
Removal of opening deferred stock
compensation balance upon adoption of
SFAS 123(R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign
currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
Unrealized holding gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for amounts
included in net loss related to sales
of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(964 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
44,855 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
258,688 |
|
|
$ |
88,344 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,713 |
|
|
$ |
355,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960 |
) |
Exercise of stock options for cash |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
Sale of common stock through employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock and stock-
based compensation and
amortization,
net |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,596 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign
currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,676 |
|
|
|
9,676 |
|
Unrealized holding gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(323 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
45,288 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
267,205 |
|
|
$ |
121,745 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,066 |
|
|
$ |
407,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
36
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,361 |
|
|
$ |
88,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities - |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,218 |
|
|
|
16,451 |
|
|
|
18,377 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
(22,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
126 |
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
|
|
(7,944 |
) |
Debt extinguishment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities - |
Accounts receivable-trade |
|
|
14,163 |
|
|
|
(5,330 |
) |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
11,737 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
(1,311 |
) |
Accounts payable trade |
|
|
(4,063 |
) |
|
|
(5,925 |
) |
|
|
6,000 |
|
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
(7,260 |
) |
Income taxes payable/receivable, net |
|
|
(3,967 |
) |
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
61,810 |
|
|
|
88,307 |
|
|
|
36,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(112,370 |
) |
|
|
(79,441 |
) |
|
|
(87,175 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
88,523 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
151,697 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
13,335 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(8,870 |
) |
|
|
(6,142 |
) |
|
|
(10,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(30,568 |
) |
|
|
(83,052 |
) |
|
|
67,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of senior borrowings and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(4,033 |
) |
|
|
(3,708 |
) |
Payments on convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189,816 |
) |
Sale of common stock through public offering, net of expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,545 |
|
Sale of common stock through employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) financing activities |
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
(85,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
(2,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
36,348 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
14,470 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year |
|
|
58,240 |
|
|
|
52,874 |
|
|
|
38,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year |
|
$ |
94,588 |
|
|
$ |
58,240 |
|
|
$ |
52,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
9,292 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
13,432 |
|
|
$ |
5,665 |
|
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
Cash held in banks outside the United States |
|
$ |
70,220 |
|
|
$ |
29,280 |
|
|
$ |
24,615 |
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements.
37
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) COMPANY OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is primarily engaged in the
development and production of components and products critical to plasma-based manufacturing
processes, which are used by manufacturers of semiconductors and in industrial thin-film
manufacturing processes.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company).
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The
consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
SEGMENT REPORTING The Company operates in one segment for the manufacture, marketing
and servicing of key products, primarily to the semiconductor capital equipment industry, in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Since the Company operates in one segment, all
financial information required by SFAS No. 131 can be found in the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto.
ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires the Companys management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant estimates are used when establishing allowances for doubtful accounts,
determining useful lives for depreciation and amortization, assessing the need for impairment
charges, establishing warranty reserves, establishing the fair value and forfeiture rate of
stock-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, and assessing excess and obsolete inventory
and various others items. The Company evaluates these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis
and bases its estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as
identifying and assessing the accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
REVENUE RECOGNITION Most of the Companys product revenue is recognized upon
shipment of the Companys products, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed
and collectibility is reasonably assured. The remainder of the Companys product revenue is
recognized upon receipt of the products by the customer, at which time title passes to the
customer, the price is fixed and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues from contracts that
contain specific customer acceptance provisions are deferred until customer acceptance occurs.
Generally, the Company does not have obligations to its customers after its products are shipped
under standard shipping terms, after its products are received by customers under destination
terms, and after the products are accepted by customers under contractual acceptance provisions,
other than pursuant to warranty obligations. In limited instances, the Company provides
installation of its products. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 00-21 Accounting
for Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables, the Company allocates revenue based on the
fair value of the delivered item, generally the product, and the undelivered item, installation,
based on their respective fair values. Revenue related to the undelivered item is deferred until
the services have been completed.
In certain instances, the Company requires its customers to pay for a portion or all of
their purchases prior to the Company building or shipping these products. Cash payments received
prior to shipment are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets, and then recognized as revenue as appropriate based upon the transfer
of title of the products. The Company does not offer price protection to customers or allow
returns, unless covered by our normal policy for repair of defective products.
SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are
recorded in sales in the consolidated statements of income. Shipping and handling costs incurred by
the Company for the delivery of products to customers are included in cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of income.
EXCESS AND OBSOLETE INVENTORY Inventory is written down or written off when it becomes
obsolete, generally due to engineering changes to a product or discontinuance of a product line, or
when it is deemed excess. Judgment by management is necessary in estimating the net realizable
value of inventory based primarily upon forecasts of product demand. Charges for excess and
obsolete inventory are recorded, as necessary, within cost of sales in the consolidated statements
of income.
WARRANTY POLICY The Company offers warranty coverage for its products for periods
typically ranging from 12 to 24 months after shipment. The Company estimates the anticipated costs
of repairing products under warranty based on the historical cost of the repairs and expected
failure rates. The assumptions used to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated periodically in
light of actual experience and, when appropriate, the accruals are adjusted. The Companys
determination of the appropriate level of
38
warranty accrual is subjective and based on estimates. Estimated warranty costs are recorded at the
time of sale of the related product, and are recorded within cost of sales in the consolidated
statements of income.
The Company recorded warranty charges of $11.2 million in 2007, $12.9 million in 2006 and
$11.2 million in 2005.
Included within the warranty charges is amortization of customer service equipment, which is
manufactured product that is utilized as replacement and loaner equipment to existing customers, of
$411,000 in 2007, $1.8 million in 2006 and $2.1 million in 2005.
The following summarizes the activity in the Companys warranty reserves during 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
$ |
6,313 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
10,859 |
|
|
|
11,087 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(9,892 |
) |
|
|
(9,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
8,812 |
|
|
$ |
7,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE Selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income are expensed as incurred, including legal and
advertising costs.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS The Companys allowance for doubtful accounts reflects
managements best estimate of probable losses inherent in the account receivable balance.
Management determines the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and
other currently available evidence.
INCOME TAXES The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be
recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets
and liabilities, computed at the expected tax rates for the periods in which the assets or
liabilities will be realized, as well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax
credit carryforwards. The Company assesses the recoverability of its net deferred tax assets on a
quarterly basis. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that it will realize a
portion or all of its remaining net deferred tax assets, some portion or all of the valuation
allowance will be reversed with a corresponding reduction in income tax expense in such period. We
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes -
an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48) as of January 1, 2007.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS
No. 123(R), Share Based Payment, to account for its stock plans and employee stock purchase plan,
which requires the recognition of the fair value of stock-based compensation in the statement of
operations. The fair value of stock options and purchase rights pursuant to the employee stock
purchase plan is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This model requires the input
of highly subjective assumptions, including expected life of the award and expected stock price
volatility. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based upon the Companys closing
stock price on the grant date. The fair value of stock-based awards expected to vest is amortized
over the requisite service period, typically the vesting period, of the award on a straight-line
basis.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is involved in disputes and legal actions
arising in the normal course of our business. While we currently believe that the amount of any
ultimate loss would not be material to our financial position, the outcome of these actions is
inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate loss could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or reported results of operations in a particular
quarter. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent litigation, could require material changes
in production processes and products or result in our inability to ship products or components
found to have violated third-party patent rights. The Company accrues loss contingencies in
connection with its commitments and contingencies, including litigation, when it is probable that a
loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all amounts on deposit with financial
institutions and highly liquid investments (valued at cost, which approximates fair value) with an
original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK Financial instruments, which potentially subject the
Company to credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and trade accounts
receivable. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and certain
other financial instruments with various major financial institutions. The Company performs
periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions and limits the
amount of credit exposure with any one institution. The Companys customers generally are
concentrated in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. As a result the Company is generally
exposed to credit risk associated with this industry. Sales by the Companys foreign subsidiaries
are primarily denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. The Company
establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of
specific customers, historical trends and other information.
INVENTORIES Inventories include costs of materials, direct labor, manufacturing
overhead, in-bound freight, duty and purchase price variance. Inventories are valued at the lower
of market or cost, computed on a first-in, first-out basis and are presented net of reserves for
excess and obsolete inventory.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is stated at cost or estimated fair value
if acquired in a business combination. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over
twenty to forty years for buildings; three to ten years for machinery, equipment, furniture and
fixtures and vehicles; and three years for computer and communication equipment. Amortization
39
of leasehold improvements and leased equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over
the lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets, whichever period is shorter. Additions,
improvements, and major renewals are capitalized, while maintenance, repairs, and minor renewals
are expensed as incurred. When depreciable assets are retired, or otherwise disposed of, the cost
and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gains or losses
are included in the consolidated statement of income. Property and other long-lived assets are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over
the fair market value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of acquired
businesses. Goodwill is not amortized. Instead, goodwill is subject to periodic (at least annual)
tests for impairment. Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) the Company assesses
goodwill for potential impairment by comparing the fair value of its reporting unit with its
carrying value, and (ii) if potential impairment is indicated because the reporting units fair
value is less than its carrying amount, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss by
comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
Finite-lived intangible assets continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate
that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
TAXES COLLECTED FROM CUSTOMERS In the course of doing business we collect various taxes
from customers including, but not limited to, sales and use taxes and value added taxes. It is our
policy to record these on a net basis in the consolidated statement
of income and, therefore,
we do not include taxes collected from customers as a component of revenue.
CUSTOMER SERVICE EQUIPMENT Customer service equipment is manufactured product that is
utilized as replacement and loaner equipment to existing customers, which is amortized to cost of
sales over its estimated useful life of two years.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION The functional currency of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries is their local currency, with the exception of the Companys manufacturing facility in
Shenzhen, China where the United States dollar is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities
of international subsidiaries are translated to United States dollars at period-end exchange rates,
and statement of income activity and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates during the
period. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of stockholders
equity.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the local currency are recorded based
on exchange rates at the time such transactions arise. Subsequent changes in exchange rates result
in foreign currency transaction gains and losses which are reflected in income as unrealized (based
on period end translation) or realized (upon settlement of the transactions). Unrealized
transaction gains and losses applicable to permanent investments by the Company in its foreign
subsidiaries are included as cumulative translation adjustments, and unrealized translation gains
or losses applicable to non-permanent intercompany receivables from or payables to the Company and
its foreign subsidiaries are included in income.
HEDGING AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge foreign
currency-denominated intercompany payables and receivables. To date, we have not hedged forecasted
transactions or firm commitments denominated in foreign currencies and therefore, financial
reporting of our foreign operations is subject to foreign currency risk. We do not invest in
contracts for speculative purposes.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), which permits entities to
choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS
No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt
this pronouncement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and does not expect a material impact from
the pronouncement on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition as the Company
does not expect to exercise the fair value option for any financial asset or liability
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair
value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting
pronouncements. SFAS No. 157, as originally issued, was effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157
for one year as it relates to non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Company will adopt SFAS
No. 157 as it relates to financial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and
does not expect any material impact on its consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R
amends the requirements for accounting for business combinations. SFAS 141R will be effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The effect of this pronouncement will depend
on the terms and timing of future acquisitions, if any.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards
setting bodies that are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise
discussed, our management believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet
effective will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
40
(2) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its stock plans under the provisions
of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
and related interpretations. APB Opinion No. 25 required the use of the intrinsic value method,
which measured compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at
the measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. As the stock
options granted under these plans typically had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant, no compensation cost related to stock options was
reflected in the Companys results of operations. The Company began to grant restricted stock
units (RSUs) in the first quarter of 2005, for which the related compensation expense is recorded
over the requisite service period.
In December 2004, the FASB reissued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation as SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based Payment. This
statement replaces SFAS No. 123, amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, and supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to
apply a fair-value based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with
employees and to record compensation expense for all share-based awards granted, and to awards
modified, repurchased or cancelled after the required effective date. Compensation expense for
outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered as of the effective date
will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro
forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Additionally, SFAS
No. 123(R) requires entities to record compensation expense for employee stock purchase plans that
may not have been considered compensatory under the previous rules. It also requires the benefits
associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a
financing cash flow rather than as an operating cash flow as previously required.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) as of January 1, 2006 (the adoption date) using the
modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective transition method,
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys statement of income in the year ended
December 31, 2006 includes: (a) stock options and RSUs granted prior to, but not fully vested as of
the adoption date, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS No. 123, (b) stock options and RSUs granted subsequent to the adoption date,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
(c) purchase rights granted under the employee stock purchase plan (the ESPP) with the offering
period beginning prior to, but not yet vested as of the adoption date, based on the fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123, and (d) purchase rights granted
under the ESPP subsequent to the adoption date, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The estimated fair value of the Companys
stock-based awards, less expected forfeitures, is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
awards requisite service period, typically the vesting period. Under the modified prospective
transition method, results for prior periods are not restated.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $4.1 million in 2007, $3.0 million
in 2006 and $345,000 in 2005. Included in these amounts are expenses related to RSUs of $638,000
in 2007, $825,000 in 2006 and $345,000 in 2005. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the
Companys income before income taxes and net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
reduced by $2.2 million. The implementation of SFAS No. 123(R) reduced basic and diluted earnings
per share by $0.05 for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The modified prospective transition method of SFAS No. 123(R) requires the presentation
of pro forma information, for periods presented prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), regarding
net income and earnings per share as if the Company had accounted for its stock plans under the
fair value method. Had compensation expense for the Companys stock plans been determined
consistent with the fair value-based method prescribed by the original provisions of SFAS No. 123,
the Companys net income would have decreased to the following adjusted amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
Adjustment for stock-based compensation
determined under fair value-based
method for all awards (a), (b) (d) |
|
|
(13,551 |
) |
Adjustment for compensation expense
recognized in net income (a) (c) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
As adjusted |
|
$ |
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
As adjusted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
As adjusted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Compensation expense in 2005 is presented prior to income tax effects due to the Company
fully reserving against the related deferred tax assets in those periods. |
41
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Cumulative compensation cost recognized with respect to options that are forfeited prior to
vesting is reflected as a reduction of compensation expense in the period of forfeiture.
Compensation expense related to awards granted under the Companys employee stock purchase plan
is estimated until the period in which settlement occurs, as the number of shares of common
stock awarded and the purchase price are not known until settlement. |
|
(c) |
|
Compensation expense in 2005 represents the expense associated with the Companys grants to
employees of restricted stock units. |
|
(d) |
|
Pro forma expense includes approximately $6.9 million, resulting from the acceleration of
vesting of options outstanding as of October 18, 2005 that have an exercise price of $15.00 per
share or higher. Options to purchase approximately 624,000 shares of common stock that would
otherwise have vested over the subsequent 30 months became fully vested. |
In 2005, the fair value of each option grant and purchase right granted under the ESPP were
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
OPTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield rates |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected lives |
|
3.8 |
years |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
74.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
ESPP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield rates |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected lives |
|
0.5 |
years |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
59.6 |
% |
Stock Plans and ESPP
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had three active stock plans; the 2003 Stock Option Plan,
the 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and the ESPP, which are described below.
Stock Options and RSUs
2003 STOCK OPTION PLAN The 2003 Stock Option Plan is a broad-based plan for employees,
executive officers, and consultants in which directors of the Company are not allowed to
participate. The Board of Directors currently administers this plan, and makes all decisions
concerning which employees, executive officers and consultants are granted options, how many to
grant to each optionee, when options are granted, how the plan should be properly interpreted,
whether to amend or terminate the plan, and whether to delegate administration of the plan to a
committee. The 2003 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 6,750,000 shares of common stock.
Shares may be issued under the 2003 Plan on exercise of incentive stock options or non-qualified
stock options granted under the 2003 Plan or as restricted stock awards. Stock appreciation rights
may also be granted under the 2003 Plan, and the shares represented by the stock appreciation
rights will be deducted from shares issuable under the 2003 Plan. The exercise price of incentive
stock options and non-qualified stock options may not be less than the market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. The administrator of the plan has the discretion to
determine the vesting period of options granted under the 2003 Plan, however option grants will
generally vest over four years, contingent upon the optionee continuing to be an employee,
executive officer or consultant of the Company. On January 31, 2005, the Company amended the 2003
Plan to provide additional terms for the restricted stock units. The contractual life of the
options is ten years from the date of grant. In 2005, restricted stock units issued vest 10% on the
first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date,
an additional 30% on the third anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 40% on the fourth
anniversary of the grant date. In 2007 and 2006, restricted stock units issued vest 25% each year
for four years. The 2003 Plan will expire in February 2013, unless the administrator of the plan
terminates it earlier. As of December 31, 2007, approximately 3.9 million shares of common stock
were available for grant under this plan.
42
2003 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN The 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan (the 2003 Directors Plan), a shareholder-approved plan, provides for the issuance of
up to 750,000 shares of common stock. The exercise price of options granted under the 2003
Directors Plan may not be less than the market value of the Companys common stock on the date of
grant. On May 24, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment of the 2003
Directors Plan, which enables different forms of equity awards to be granted under the 2003
Directors Plan. Pursuant to the Companys current non-employee director compensation structure,
non-employee directors are granted 15,000 RSUs on the date first elected or appointed as a member
of the Companys board, and 6,000 RSUs on any date re-elected as a member of the board. Such RSU
grants vest over four years, contingent upon the recipient continuing to be a director of the
Company. As of December 31, 2007, 509,000 shares of common stock were available for grant under
the 2003 Directors Plan.
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options for the year ended December 31,
2007 is presented below:
(In thousands, except share prices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
$ |
19.09 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
19.82 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
13.62 |
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
24.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at end of period |
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
19.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
20.94 |
|
Price range of outstanding options |
|
$ |
7.15-$60.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Price range of options terminated |
|
$ |
7.15-$43.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee directors |
Options outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
128 |
|
|
$ |
13.21 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
9.13 |
|
Terminated |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
29.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at end of period |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
13.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
13.39 |
|
Price range of outstanding options |
|
$ |
8.25-$46.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Price range of options terminated |
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options issued to employees was $19.82, $9.90 and $4.42 for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average fair value of
options issued to directors was $8.13 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $4.2
million, $1.8 million and $700,000, respectively, determined as
of the exercise date. The aggregate intrinsic value of employee options outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2007 was $3.1 million and $2.2 million,
respectively, and the aggregate intrinsic value of non-employee
director options outstanding and exercisable at December 31,
2007 was $170,000. As of
December 31, 2007, there was $10.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock
options granted and outstanding, which is expected to be recognized through fiscal year 2011, with
a weighted average remaining vesting period of 3.5 years. Cash received from stock option exercises
was $4.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.
The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2007:
(In thousands, except share prices and lives)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Range of |
|
Number |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
Exercisable |
|
Price |
$7.15 to $7.70 |
|
|
358 |
|
|
6.0 years |
|
$ |
7.40 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
$9.12 to $11.95 |
|
|
318 |
|
|
6.9 years |
|
|
9.76 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
9.67 |
|
$12.75 to $14.93 |
|
|
353 |
|
|
8.6 years |
|
|
14.50 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
13.47 |
|
$16.13 to $17.12 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
8.3 years |
|
|
16.48 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
16.48 |
|
$17.85 to $20.19 |
|
|
433 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
|
19.11 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
18.54 |
|
$20.81 to $22.47 |
|
|
452 |
|
|
7.1 years |
|
|
22.12 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
21.95 |
|
$22.52 to $24.21 |
|
|
335 |
|
|
7.3 years |
|
|
23.32 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
22.55 |
|
$24.90 to $36.56 |
|
|
326 |
|
|
3.2 years |
|
|
28.45 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
28.44 |
|
$38.55 to $44.97 |
|
|
173 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
|
40.17 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
40.17 |
|
$60.75 to $60.75 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
2.6 years |
|
|
60.75 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
60.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
6.5 years |
|
$ |
19.48 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
$ |
20.94 |
|
43
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Expected dividend yield rates |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
5.5 |
years |
|
5.5 |
years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
60.5 |
% |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
Expected forfeiture rate |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
The computation of the expected volatility assumption for new grants is based on a combination
of historical and implied volatilities. When establishing the expected life assumption, the Company
reviews historical exercise behavior of option grants with similar vesting periods and post-vesting
termination behavior.
A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested RSUs as of December 31, 2007, and changes
during the year then ended are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-date |
(In thousands, except fair values) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Non-vested RSUs outstanding |
|
|
376 |
|
|
$ |
11.42 |
|
RSUs granted |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
22.49 |
|
RSUs vested |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
18.83 |
|
RSUs forfeited |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested RSUs outstanding |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
16.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys RSUs is determined based upon the closing fair market value of
the Companys common stock on the grant date. As of December 31, 2007, there was $4.8 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs granted, which cost is expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years. During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, the total fair value of RSUs which vested was $1.7 million and $363,000, based upon
the closing fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date the underlying common stock
was released to the recipient.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP)
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN The ESPP, a shareholder-approved plan, provides for
the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock. Employees are eligible to participate in the
ESPP if employed by the Company for at least 20 hours per week during at least five months per
calendar year. Participating employees may have the lesser of 5% their earnings or $1,250 per
six-month period withheld. The purchase price of common stock purchased under the ESPP is equal to
85% of the lower of the fair market value on the commencement date of each offering period or the
relevant purchase date. Each plan period is six months. At December 31, 2007, approximately 87,000
shares remained available for future issuance under the ESPP.
Purchase rights granted under the ESPP are valued using the Black-Scholes model. Prior to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company used historical volatility in deriving its expected
volatility assumption; however, the Company has determined that implied volatility provides a more
accurate reflection of market conditions and is a better indicator of expected volatility than
historical volatility for the six month plan period. As of December 31, 2007, there was $55,000 of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to the ESPP that is expected to be recognized over a
remaining period of four months.
44
The fair value of each purchase right granted under the ESPP was estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
ESPP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield rates |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected lives |
|
0.5 |
years |
|
0.5 |
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
60.5 |
% |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
(3) DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On June 24, 2005, the Company sold the assets of its EMCO product line to an unrelated
third party for net cash proceeds of $3.7 million, as this product line was not critical to the
Companys core operations. The sale included assets with a book value of approximately $663,000,
comprised of $515,000 of accounts receivable, $71,000 of inventory, $42,000 of fixed assets, and
$35,000 of prepaid expenses, and liabilities of approximately $94,000. In accordance with SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill of $471,000 was allocated to the sale
based upon its estimated fair value relative to the portion of the reporting unit that will be
retained. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $2.6 million, which is recorded in
discontinued operations in the statement of income. In the fourth quarter of 2005, a purchase price
adjustment of $237,000 was made in favor of the Company, and recorded as additional gain on the
sale. In the second quarter of 2006, $138,000 held in escrow was released and a gain recorded in
discontinued operations. The EMCO product line did not represent a significant portion of the
Companys operations, with revenues representing 1.8% of annual consolidated sales through its sale
on June 24, 2005.
On November 23, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the assets of its
IKOR product line to an unrelated third party, as this product line was not considered to be
critical to the Companys core operations. Net cash proceeds of $8.9 million were received, with
an additional $1.0 million held in escrow to satisfy any potential indemnity claims. The sale
included assets with a book value of approximately $4.1 million, comprised of $1.3 million of
accounts receivable, $1.3 million of inventory, $492,000 of fixed assets, and $44,000 of prepaid
expenses, and liabilities of approximately $207,000. Goodwill of $1.0 million was allocated to the
sale based upon its estimated fair value relative to the portion of the reporting unit that will be
retained. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $5.0 million, which is recorded in
discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the
$1.0 million held in escrow was released and a gain recorded for this amount in discontinued
operations. The results of operations directly attributed to the IKOR product line that have been
reclassified from continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Sales |
|
$ |
11,581 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6,505 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,736 |
|
(4) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Restructuring charges include the costs associated with actions taken by the Company
primarily in response to downturns in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. These charges
consist of costs that are incurred to exit an activity or cancel an existing contractual
obligation, including the closure of facilities and employee termination related charges.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Exit or
Disposal Activities, which nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity. SFAS No. 146 requires costs
associated with exit or disposal activities to be recognized when they are incurred, whereas under
EITF Issue No. 94-3, a liability was recognized at the date of an entitys commitment to an exit
plan. As related to employee termination benefits, the provisions of SFAS No. 146 offer guidance on
one-time termination benefits, and exclude from the scope on-going benefit arrangements,
therefore, the Company follows the guidance within SFAS No. 146 for voluntary severances and other
one-time termination benefits.
The accounting for the standard severance benefits that the Company pays for
involuntarily severed employees, considered an on-going benefit arrangement, is excluded from the
scope of SFAS No. 146. For these benefits, the Company follows the guidance under SFAS No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits. Severance costs accounted for under SFAS No. 88 are accrued and recorded as
restructuring expense when such amount is probable that employees will be entitled to benefits and
the amount can be reasonably estimated.
45
The following table summarizes the components of the restructuring charges, the payments
and non-cash charges, and the remaining accrual as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Severance and |
|
|
Closure & |
|
|
of Facility- |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Other |
|
|
related Assets |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accrual balance December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
3,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
Total net
restructuring charges in 2005 |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
Payments and other settlements in 2005 |
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(6,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual balance December 31, 2005 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
Total net
restructuring charges in 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
Payments and other settlements in 2006 |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
restructuring charges in 2007 |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
3,476 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
Payments and other settlements in 2007 |
|
|
(1,879 |
) |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(3,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual balance December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 2, 2007, the Company announced that it would close its manufacturing, distribution,
and research and development facility located in Stolberg, Germany. Related to this manufacturing
transition, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $3.5 million in 2007, consisting
primarily of severance benefit costs associated with the planned reduction of employees at this
facility, and an asset impairment charge of approximately $854,000
relating to the write-down of certain real and personal property located at this facility to
estimated fair value. The Stolberg facility closed in October 2007 and
related to the restructuring, on October 2, 2007, the Company completed the sale of assets related
to its LPPA product line for $2.2 million resulting in a gain of
$189,000.
In 2004, the Company transitioned certain product lines from certain of the Companys
locations in Europe and Japan, the Company recorded restructuring charges for employee severance
and termination costs of $2.1 million in 2005. These charges are associated with
216 employees in the United States, 11 employees in Europe and three employees in Japan. Through
the transition of the Companys manufacturing operations from the Fort Collins facility to
Shenzhen, China, the Company recognized the need to retain 11 employees considered in the original
reserve, and therefore in the third quarter of 2005 restructuring reserves of $180,000 were
reversed.
Impairments of facility-related assets were recorded in 2005 for
$589,000 in the United States and $157,000 in Japan, as a result
of consolidation of certain of the Companys facilities.
(5) MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Investment securities with original maturities of more than three months but less than
one year at time of purchase are considered marketable securities. Marketable securities as of
December 31, 2007 included commercial paper, municipal bonds and notes, institutional money markets
and auction rate securities. Auction rate securities are debt instruments with long-term scheduled maturities, but have
interest rates that are typically reset at pre-determined intervals, usually every 7, 28, 35 or 90
days, at which time the securities can typically be purchased or sold. When there is an active
secondary market for such investments, the rate reset for each instrument is an opportunity to
accept the reset rate or sell the instrument at its face value. The Companys investments are classified as available for sale securities, and are
recorded at fair value with changes in fair market value recorded as unrealized holding gains or
losses in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
The Companys short-term investments are carried at their fair value based on the quoted market
prices of the securities. For purposes of
determining realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on specific
identification. The composition of securities, classified as current assets is as follows at December 31, 2007, and
December 31, 2006:
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
1,475 |
|
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
26,824 |
|
|
$ |
29,910 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
Corporate bonds/notes |
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
Municipal bonds/notes |
|
|
24,662 |
|
|
|
24,595 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
50,563 |
|
|
|
51,003 |
|
|
|
40,800 |
|
|
|
40,899 |
|
Institutional money markets |
|
|
24,885 |
|
|
|
24,885 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
110,259 |
|
|
$ |
110,676 |
|
|
$ |
82,771 |
|
|
$ |
85,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The value and liquidity of these securities are affected by market conditions as well as
the ability of the issuer to make principal and interest payments when due, and the functioning of
the markets in which these securities are traded. Subsequent to December 31, 2007, we sold
approximately $11 million in auction rate securities. However, starting on February 14, 2008, we
experienced difficulty in selling additional securities due to the failure of the auction mechanism
which provides liquidity to these securities. The securities for which auctions have failed will
continue to accrue interest and be auctioned every 35 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer
calls the securities, or they mature. Accordingly, there may be no effective mechanism for selling
these securities. As of March 12, 2008, the Company had approximately $40 million of auction rate
securities and as of December 31, 2007, the Company does not believe such securities are impaired
or that the failure of the auction mechanism will have a material impact on our liquidity.
In 2007, the Company sold its investments in marketable equity securities which were included
in deposits and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consisted of $1.2 million
and $2.9 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These investments were classified as
available-for-sale securities and were reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and
losses included in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Investment income for the years ended December 31, 2007, and December 31, 20006 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gross realized gains from sale of securities |
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
1,669 |
|
Gross realized losses from sale of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend and interest income |
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
|
$ |
3,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TRADE
Trade accounts receivable consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
18,909 |
|
|
$ |
32,043 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
42,996 |
|
|
|
40,458 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable trade |
|
$ |
61,545 |
|
|
$ |
71,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Parts and raw materials |
|
$ |
37,742 |
|
|
$ |
39,515 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
10,578 |
|
|
|
10,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
50,532 |
|
|
$ |
52,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories include costs of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.
Inventories are valued at the lower of market or cost, computed on a first-in, first-out basis.
Inventory obsolescence reserves were $7.9 million and $8.6 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
47
(8) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND CUSTOMER SERVICE EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Land |
|
$ |
4,841 |
|
|
$ |
4,489 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
44,740 |
|
|
|
42,667 |
|
Computer and communication equipment |
|
|
27,927 |
|
|
|
32,039 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
23,688 |
|
|
|
21,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,088 |
|
|
|
111,778 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(82,176 |
) |
|
|
(78,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment |
|
$ |
30,912 |
|
|
$ |
33,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $10.4 million in 2007,
$12.1 million in 2006 and $12.8 million in 2005.
Customer service equipment is manufactured product that is utilized as replacement and loaner
equipment to existing customers, which is amortized to cost of sales over its estimated useful life
of two years. Customer service equipment was $10.3 million and $9.9 million at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively and accumulated amortization for this equipment was $9.1 million and $9.1
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(9) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
in Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except weighted-average useful life) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology-based |
|
$ |
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,990 |
) |
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trademarks and other |
|
|
8,604 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,725 |
) |
|
|
5,784 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangibles |
|
|
15,619 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,715 |
) |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
49,581 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
$ |
65,200 |
|
|
$ |
15,468 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,715 |
) |
|
$ |
67,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill of $185,000 was allocated to the 2007 sale of
one of our product lines based upon its estimated fair value relative to the portion of the
reporting unit that will be retained.
Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rates |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
in Years |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except weighted-average useful life) |
|
Amortizable intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology-based |
|
$ |
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
(7,499 |
) |
|
$ |
993 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trademarks and other |
|
|
8,604 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
(4,270 |
) |
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangibles |
|
|
15,619 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
(11,769 |
) |
|
|
6,905 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
49,766 |
|
|
|
8,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
$ |
65,385 |
|
|
$ |
11,969 |
|
|
$ |
(11,769 |
) |
|
$ |
65,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys goodwill and other intangible assets have primarily resulted from purchases
of Japanese and German companies, and accordingly, carrying amounts for these assets are impacted
by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
48
Aggregate amortization expense related to amortizable intangibles was $946,000 in 2007,
$1.8 million in 2006, and $2.1 million in 2005. Estimated amortization expense related to the
Companys acquired intangibles fluctuates with changes in foreign currency exchange rates between
the United States dollar and the Japanese yen and the euro. Estimated amortization expense related
to amortizable intangibles for each of the five years 2008 through 2012 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
(in thousands) |
2008 |
|
$ |
833 |
|
2009 |
|
|
521 |
|
2010 |
|
|
418 |
|
2011 |
|
|
418 |
|
2012 |
|
|
418 |
|
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test,
and concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed at the measurement date, as the estimated fair
value of the Companys reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount.
(10) DEBT
On August 17, 2005, the Company issued 10 million shares of common stock at a price of
$9.75 per share pursuant to an underwritten public offering. On August 22, 2005, the Company issued
an additional 1.5 million shares of common stock at the same price, pursuant to the underwriters
exercise of their over-allotment option. Proceeds from this offering of 11.5 million shares of
common stock were approximately $105.5 million, net of the underwriters discount and offering
expenses of approximately $6.6 million. The net proceeds were used to fully redeem the Companys
5.25% convertible subordinated notes due 2006, and toward the full redemption of the Companys 5.0%
convertible subordinated notes due 2006. Debt extinguishment expense recorded in the consolidated
statements of income of $3.2 million is comprised of $2.1 million for redemption premium and
$1.1 million for the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs.
We currently have a $25 million secured revolving line of credit with a maturity date of July
5, 2008. Any advances under our amended credit facility will bear interest at the prime rate (6%
at March 12, 2008) minus 1%. No amounts are currently outstanding under this credit facility.
(11) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing income available to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The
computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the numerator is
increased to exclude certain charges which would not have been incurred, and the denominator is
increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding (using
the if-converted and treasury stock methods), if securities containing potentially dilutive common
shares (convertible notes payable, stock options and restricted stock units) had been converted to
such common shares, and if such assumed conversion is dilutive. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
stock options and restricted stock units totaling approximately 3.7 million and 3.5 million shares,
respectively, were outstanding, of which 3.2 million and 2.9 million shares, respectively are not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect of including such
options in the computation would be anti-dilutive.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the
calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Earnings per common sharebasic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,361 |
|
|
$ |
88,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
45,156 |
|
|
|
44,721 |
|
|
|
37,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common shareassuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,361 |
|
|
$ |
88,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,817 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
45,156 |
|
|
|
44,721 |
|
|
|
37,084 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive common shares |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
45,704 |
|
|
|
45,265 |
|
|
|
37,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common shareassuming dilution |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
On December 24, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75
million of the Companys common stock. The Company may repurchase shares in the open market,
through privately negotiated transactions, block trades, Rule 10b5-1 plans or other available
means. In February 2008, The Company began repurchasing shares pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan.
There is no minimum number of shares to be repurchased, and the Company may discontinue
repurchasing shares at any time. The repurchases of shares may depend upon the availability of
cash, general economic and stock market conditions and other considerations.
(12) INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized for temporary
differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities, computed
at the expected tax rates for the periods in which the assets or liabilities will be realized, as
well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In 2003,
the Company began recording valuation allowances against certain of its United States and foreign
net deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where the Company has incurred significant losses. Given
such experience, prior to December 31, 2006, management could not conclude that it was more likely
than not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized. Based on the Companys 2006
operating results, the Companys management, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, evaluated the
recoverability of its net deferred tax assets and concluded that it was more likely than not that
the majority of net deferred tax assets would be realized and recorded a reduction in the valuation
allowance of approximately $39 million for the entire 2006 year. The Company assesses the
recoverability of its net deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. If the Company determines that
it is more likely than not that it will realize a portion or all of its remaining net deferred tax
assets, some portion or all of the valuation allowance will be reversed with a corresponding
reduction in income tax expense in such period.
The income tax expense of $16.4 million in 2007 represents an effective tax rate on
income from continuing operations of 32%. The income tax benefit of $15.1 million in 2006
represents an effective tax rate on income from continuing operations of (21)%. This negative rate
includes the impact of the reversal of the valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2006. The
income tax provision of $4.9 million in 2005 represents an effective tax rate on income from
continuing operations of 57%, due to taxable income earned in certain foreign jurisdictions. The
Companys income from discontinued operations was earned in the United States. No provision for
income taxes is attributed to these discontinued operations, due to the valuation allowances
against certain deferred tax assets in the United States that existed in those periods, including
those generated by net operating losses, that offset the income from discontinued operations.
Approximately $5.3 million of net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 related to certain
US net operating losses that are subject to limitations under the US tax code, these assets
continue to have a full valuation allowance as management could not conclude that it was more
likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized.
When recording acquisitions, the Company has recorded valuation allowances due to the
uncertainty related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at the acquisition
dates. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future
periods if estimates of future taxable income are changed. At December 31, 2006, approximately $2.9
million of the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets obtained through acquisitions.
Any reversals of valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting will be reflected as a
reduction of goodwill in the period of reversal. For the year ended December 31, 2006, $3.7
million of valuation allowance, representing 100% of the valuation allowances established in
purchase accounting, was reversed with a corresponding reduction in goodwill. There are no further
adjustments related to deferred tax assets established in purchase accounting to be booked in the
current or future periods.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 was, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Federal |
|
$ |
5,363 |
|
|
$ |
(18,719 |
) |
|
$ |
700 |
|
State and local |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
|
|
300 |
|
Foreign taxes |
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
|
5,721 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,389 |
|
|
$ |
(15,118 |
) |
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
11,264 |
|
|
$ |
7,162 |
|
|
$ |
6,003 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
(22,280 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,389 |
|
|
$ |
(15,118 |
) |
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
The following reconciles the Companys effective tax rate on income from continuing
operations to the federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income taxes per federal
statutory rate |
|
$ |
17,767 |
|
|
$ |
25,223 |
|
|
$ |
2,973 |
|
State income taxes, net of
federal deduction |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Effect of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
Extraterritorial income exclusion |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
Nondeductible intangible and
goodwill amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other permanent items, net |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
Effect of foreign taxes |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
(581 |
) |
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(39,283 |
) |
|
|
283 |
|
Tax credits and other items |
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,389 |
|
|
$ |
(15,118 |
) |
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sources of the Companys net deferred income tax assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee bonuses and commissions |
|
$ |
803 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
2,877 |
|
Bad debt reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
Vacation accrual |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Restructuring accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforward |
|
|
10,175 |
|
|
|
13,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
23,696 |
|
|
|
24,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforward |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
11,785 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(5,365 |
) |
|
|
(5,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term, net |
|
$ |
2,207 |
|
|
$ |
6,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net |
|
$ |
25,903 |
|
|
$ |
31,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Company had a gross federal net operating loss, alternative
minimum tax credit and research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $34.7
million, $3.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, which may be available
51
to offset future
federal income tax liabilities. In addition, there is an additional $1.0 million research and
development credit that will become an unrecognized tax benefit as the Companys net operating
losses are utilized. Approximately $14 million of the gross
federal net operating losses are limited by certain provisions of the US tax code which restricts
their utilization in the future. The federal net operating loss and research and development
credit carryforwards expire at various dates through December 31, 2027, the alternative minimum tax
credit carryforward has no expiration date. In addition, as of December 31, 2007, the Company had a
gross foreign net operating loss carryforward of $2.0 million, which may be available to offset
future foreign income tax liabilities and expire at various dates through December 31, 2012.
Undistributed earnings of the Company are considered to be permanently reinvested and
accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes has
been made. These earnings could become subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to a reduction for
foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries if they are
remitted as dividends, are loaned to the Company, or if we sell our stock in the subsidiaries.
The domestic versus foreign component of the Companys income from continuing operations
before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
19,570 |
|
|
$ |
44,064 |
|
|
$ |
(4,772 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
31,180 |
|
|
|
28,002 |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,750 |
|
|
$ |
72,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Contingencies
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Upon adoption, the Company increased the long-term
liability associated with uncertain tax positions by approximately $6 million and also increased
the long-term receivable by approximately $5 million consisting of offsetting tax benefits. The
balance of $1 million is an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1,
2007.
The reconciliation of our tax contingencies is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,960 |
|
Additions based on tax positions taken during a prior period |
|
|
50 |
|
Reductions based on tax positions taken during a prior period |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Additions based on tax positions taken during the current period |
|
|
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions taken during the current period |
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to settlement of tax matters |
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
If the $5.8 million of tax contingencies reverse, $1.1 million will affect our effective tax
rate. The tax years 2003 through 2007 remain open to examination by the United States taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject. The foreign jurisdictions have open tax years from 2001 to
2007. In accordance with the Companys accounting policy, the Company recognizes accrued interest
and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of tax expense. This policy did
not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. The Company did not have any accrued interest or
penalties at December 31, 2007. The Company does not anticipate a material change to the amount of
unrecognized tax positions within the next 12 months.
While management believes the Company has adequately provided for all tax positions,
amounts asserted by taxing authorities could materially differ from our accrued positions as a
result of uncertain and complex application of tax regulations. Additionally, the recognition and
measurement of certain tax benefits includes estimates and judgment by management and inherently
includes subjectivity. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related
matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are
settled or otherwise resolved.
52
(13) RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers most full-time employees age
eighteen or older. Participants may defer up to the maximum amount allowed as determined by law.
Participants are immediately vested in their contributions.
The Company may make discretionary contributions based on corporate financial results.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Companys contribution for participants in its 401(k)
plan was 50% matching on contributions by employees up 6% of the employees compensation. For the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Companys contribution for participants in its 401(k)
plan was 25% matching on contributions by employees up to 6% of the employees compensation. The
Companys total contributions to the plan were approximately $1.3 million, $633,000, and $698,000
in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Vesting in the profit sharing contribution account is based
on years of service, with most participants fully vested after four years of credited service.
(14) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
DISPUTES AND LEGAL ACTIONS
The Company is involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the normal course of its
business. The Companys most significant legal actions have involved the application of patent law
to complex technologies and intellectual property. The determination of whether such technologies
infringe upon the Companys or others patents can be highly subjective. This subjectivity
introduces substantial additional risk with regard to the outcome of the Companys disputes and
legal actions related to intellectual property. In the event of any adverse outcome, the ultimate
loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position or reported results
of operations in a particular period. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent litigation,
could require material changes in production processes and products or result in the Companys
inability to ship products or components found to have violated third-party patent rights. The
Company accrues loss contingencies in connection with its litigation when it is probable that a
loss has occurred or may occur and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
In April 2003, the Company filed a claim in the United States District Court for the District
of Colorado seeking a declaratory ruling that its plasma source products Xstream With Active
Matching Network (Xstream products) were not in violation of patents held in the United States
by MKS Instruments, Inc. (MKS). On June 2, 2004, MKS filed a petition in the District Court in
Munich, Germany, alleging infringement by the Companys Xstream products of a counterpart German
patent owned by MKS. On July 12, 2004, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Delaware against MKS alleging that MKSs Astron reactive gas source
products infringe Advanced Energys United States Patent No. 6,046,546. The case was voluntarily
dismissed on March 11, 2005 under an agreement that left the Company free to refile its claims upon
conclusion of MKSs lawsuit against the Companys Xstream products. On October 3, 2005, the Company
executed a settlement agreement with MKS resolving all pending claims. Pursuant to the settlement
agreement, the Company paid $3.0 million to MKS.
On December 11, 2006, the Audit Division of U.S. Customs and Border Protection issued a report
to the Company stating that as a result of a recently concluded audit, the Division recommended
that a loss of revenue claim be made by CBP with respect to certain duty-free entries of returned
goods made by Advanced Energy.
On November 5, 2007, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Colorado by Xantrex Technology, Inc., alleging various breaches of confidence and interference with
contractual duties in connection with the Companys hiring of a former employee of Xantrex. The
Company believes the allegations to be unfounded and will defend itself vigorously against the
claims.
OPERATING LEASES
The Company has various operating leases for automobiles, equipment, and office and
production facilities. Lease expense under operating leases was approximately $5.8 million, $5.8
million and $5.9 million in 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively.
The future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable operating leases as of
December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
5,448 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,146 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2,965 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,830 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,448 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
53
The Company finances a portion of its property and equipment under capital lease obligations
at interest rates averaging approximately 3%. Pursuant to the capital lease agreements, future
minimum lease payments totaling $243,000 are due in varying monthly increments through 2012.
(15) FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company has operations in the United States, Europe and Asia. The following is a
summary of the Companys operations by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
207,265 |
|
|
$ |
238,468 |
|
|
$ |
163,657 |
|
Europe |
|
|
42,051 |
|
|
|
41,760 |
|
|
|
34,228 |
|
Asia |
|
|
135,383 |
|
|
|
130,514 |
|
|
|
127,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
384,699 |
|
|
$ |
410,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
15,158 |
|
|
$ |
38,678 |
|
|
$ |
709 |
|
Europe |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
1,868 |
|
Asia |
|
|
24,037 |
|
|
|
21,318 |
|
|
|
12,285 |
|
Intercompany eliminations |
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,940 |
|
|
$ |
67,389 |
|
|
$ |
15,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
19,203 |
|
|
$ |
14,954 |
|
|
$ |
19,813 |
|
Europe |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
Asia |
|
|
17,526 |
|
|
|
18,616 |
|
|
|
21,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,709 |
|
|
$ |
35,846 |
|
|
$ |
42,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These sales amounts do not contemplate where our customers may subsequently transfer our products. |
Intercompany sales among the Companys geographic areas are recorded on the basis of
intercompany prices established by the Company.
The Company has two major customers (sales in excess of 10% of total sales), one which is
a manufacturer of semiconductor capital equipment, and the other which is a manufacturer of flat
panel display capital equipment. Sales to these customers accounted for the following percentages
of sales for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Applied Materials, Inc |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Ulvac, Inc. |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sales to Ulvac, Inc. represented less than 10% during this period. |
There were no other customers that represented greater than 10% of the Companys total
sales for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Trade accounts receivable from Applied Materials, Inc. were approximately $9.5 and $12.7
million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which represented approximately 15% and 18%
of the Companys total trade accounts receivable, respectively. No other customers had a trade
accounts receivable balance in excess of 10% of the total trade accounts receivable at December 31,
2007.
(16) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leases its executive offices and manufacturing facilities in Fort Collins,
Colorado from two limited liability
partnerships in which the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors holds an interest. The
leases relating to these spaces expire in 2009, 2011 and 2016 and contain monthly payments of
approximately $96,000, $74,000 and $89,000, respectively.
54
For the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately $3.1 million was paid attributable to
these leases, and approximately $3.2 and $2.9 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Rent and related amounts are expensed as incurred.
The Company also had an agreement, which was terminated in 2006, whereby monthly payments of
approximately $12,000 were made to one of the above mentioned limited liability partnerships, which
secured future leasing rights on a parcel of land in Colorado. Such amounts were expensed as
incurred. Approximately $100,000 and $144,000 was paid attributable to this agreement in the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(17) CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
FORWARD CONTRACTS The Company, including its subsidiaries, enters into foreign currency
forward contracts with counterparties to mitigate foreign currency exposure from foreign currency
denominated trade purchases and intercompany receivables and payables. These derivative instruments
are not held for trading or speculative purposes.
To the extent that changes occur in currency exchange rates, the Company is exposed to market
risk on its open derivative instruments. This market risk exposure is generally offset by the gain
or loss recognized upon the translation of its trade purchases and intercompany receivables and
payables. Foreign currency forward contracts are entered into with major commercial United States,
Japanese and German banks that have high credit ratings, and the Company does not expect the
counterparties to fail to meet their obligations under outstanding contracts. Foreign currency
gains and losses under these arrangements are not deferred. The Company generally enters into
foreign currency forward contracts with maturities of one month, with contracts outstanding at
December 31, 2007 maturing through January 2008. The Company did not seek specific hedge accounting
treatment for its foreign currency forward contracts.
At December 31, 2007, the Company held the following foreign currency forward contracts to buy
United States dollars and sell various foreign currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound contract |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
South Korean won contract |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Taiwanese dollar contract |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK The Company uses financial instruments that potentially
subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, and foreign currency forward contracts. The Company invests its
cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, auction rate securities and municipal
bonds and notes. The Company places its investments with high-credit quality financial institutions
and limits the credit exposure from any one financial institution or instrument. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally requires no
collateral. Because the Companys receivables are primarily related to companies in the
semiconductor capital equipment industry, the Company is exposed to credit risk generally related
to this cyclical industry.
(18) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Companys financial instruments include cash, trade receivables, trade payables,
marketable securities, including auction rate securities, short-term and
foreign currency forward exchange contracts (see Note 17). The fair values of cash, trade
receivables, trade payables and short-term debt approximate the carrying values due to the
short-term nature of these instruments. Marketable securities are stated at fair value (see Note
5).
(19) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA UNAUDITED
The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial data for each of the eight quarters
in the period ended December 31, 2007. The Company believes that all necessary adjustments have
been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. The
operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent
period. The amounts below have been restated to reclassify the results of discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
Sept. 30, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
93,950 |
|
|
$ |
104,571 |
|
|
$ |
107,688 |
|
|
$ |
104,533 |
|
|
$ |
107,323 |
|
|
$ |
103,049 |
|
|
$ |
90,941 |
|
|
$ |
83,836 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
38,550 |
|
|
|
44,760 |
|
|
|
47,014 |
|
|
|
44,894 |
|
|
|
48,309 |
|
|
|
44,955 |
|
|
|
36,726 |
|
|
|
32,819 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,180 |
|
|
|
19,231 |
|
|
|
18,329 |
|
|
|
16,649 |
|
|
|
17,940 |
|
|
|
16,270 |
|
|
|
7,495 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
12,761 |
|
|
|
18,025 |
|
|
|
16,992 |
|
|
|
39,406 |
|
|
|
12,671 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
Income from discontinued operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,761 |
|
|
$ |
18,163 |
|
|
$ |
16,992 |
|
|
$ |
40,406 |
|
|
$ |
12,671 |
|
|
$ |
11,667 |
|
|
$ |
5,856 |
|
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
45,004 |
|
|
|
45,108 |
|
|
|
45,166 |
|
|
|
45,345 |
|
|
|
45,636 |
|
|
|
45,992 |
|
|
|
45,761 |
|
|
|
45,758 |
|
The net income of $40.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 includes a reduction in the
valuation allowance at December 31, 2006 of $23.5 million.
55
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Recoveries) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory obsolescence reserve |
|
$ |
14,651 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
5,752 |
|
|
$ |
10,588 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
9,594 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory obsolescence reserve |
|
$ |
10,588 |
|
|
$ |
2,644 |
|
|
$ |
4,638 |
|
|
$ |
8,594 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
11,087 |
|
|
|
9,555 |
|
|
|
7,845 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory obsolescence reserve |
|
$ |
8,594 |
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
7,891 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
7,845 |
|
|
|
10,859 |
|
|
|
9,892 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31,
2007. Based upon this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of December 31, 2007.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We maintain internal control over our financial reporting, which is a process designed under
the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and implemented by our
Board of Directors, management and other personnel. Our internal control over financial reporting
is designed to provide reasonable assurance concerning the reliability of our financial reporting
and the preparation of our financial statements.
Management,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, using the criteria described in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this evaluation,
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2007.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
fourth quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Controls and Procedures
Management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting provide
56
reasonable assurance that the objectives of our control system are met. We do not expect, however,
that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all misstatements, errors and fraud, if any. All control systems, no matter how
well designed and implemented, have inherent limitations; and no evaluation therefore can provide
absolute assurance that every misstatement, error or instance of fraud, if any, or risk thereof,
has been or will be prevented or detected. The occurrence of a misstatement, error or fraud, if
any, would not necessarily require a conclusion that our controls and procedures are not effective.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, certain information required by this
Part III is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement relating to our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (the 2008 Proxy Statement), as set forth below. The 2008 Proxy Statement
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our
fiscal year.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information set forth in the 2008 Proxy Statement under the headings Proposal No. 1/
Election of DirectorsNominees and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance is
incorporated herein by reference. The information under the heading Executive Officers of the
Registrant in Part I of this Form 10-K is also incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information set forth in the 2008 Proxy Statement under the headings Executive
Compensation and Stock Performance Graph is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information set forth in the 2008 Proxy Statement under the headings Common Stock
Ownership by Management and Other Stockholders and Equity Compensation Plan Information is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information set forth in the 2008 Proxy Statement under the caption Certain Transactions
with Management is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth in the 2008 Proxy Statement under the caption Fees Billed by
Independent Public Accountants is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(A) |
|
Documents filed as part of this report are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
1.
|
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
Reports of Grant Thornton LLP |
|
31 |
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 |
|
33 |
|
|
Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 |
|
35 |
|
|
Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive loss for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
36 |
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 |
|
37 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
38 |
2.
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
56 |
57
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.(1) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-laws.(2) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment to By-laws.(3) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Specimen Certificate for Common Stock.(2) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated July 6, 2005, by and among Silicon Valley
Bank, as a bank, and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., as borrower.(4) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Loan Modification Agreement dated July 25, 2006, by and between Silicon
Valley Bank and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (5) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Loan Modification Agreement dated August 2, 2007, by and between Silicon
Valley Bank and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (6) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Lease, dated June 12, 1984, amended June 11, 1992, by and between Prospect
Park East Partnership and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for property
located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Lease, dated March 14, 1994, as amended, by and between Sharp Point
Properties, L.L.C., and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for property
located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Lease, dated May 19, 1995, by and between Sharp Point Properties, L.L.C. and
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a building located in Fort Collins,
Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Lease dated March 20, 2000, by and between Sharp Point Properties, L.L.C.
and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a building located in Fort
Collins, Colorado.(7) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Lease dated January 16, 2003, by and between China Great Wall Computer
Shenzhen Co., Ltd., Great Wall Limited and Advanced Energy Industries
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., for a building located in Shenzhen, China.(8) |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.(2) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated through February 7, 2001.(9)* |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
through February 7, 2001.(9)* |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2001 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
2002 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
2003 Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2003 Stock Option Plan, dated January 31, 2005.(10)* |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock Option Plan.(10)* |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Employees Stock Option Plan. (6)* |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated.(6)* |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the 2003
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated as of
February 15, 2006. (11) * |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan. (12) * |
58
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock Option Plan.(13)* |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Non-employee Director Compensation summary.(14)* |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement.(15) |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Retirement Term Sheet relating to Douglas S. Schatz.(16) |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Offer Letter to Hans-Georg Betz dated June 30, 2005.(17) |
10.27
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement dated June 30, 2005 by and
between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Hans-Georg Betz.(17) |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Global Supply Agreement by and between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and
Applied Materials Inc. dated August 29, 2005.(18) + |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Shipping Amendment to the Global Supply Agreement by and between Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and Applied Materials Inc. dated August 29,
2005.(18) + |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated October 3, 2005, by and between Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. and MKS Instruments, Inc. and its subsidiary, Applied
Science and Technology, Inc.(19) |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Structure. (20) * |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
2006 Leadership Performance Incentive Plan. (12) * |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Advisory Services Agreement dated
as of October 26, 2007 by and between Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and Joseph R. Bronson. |
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethical Conduct, as revised. (21) |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney.(15) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(File No. 000-26966), filed November 4, 2003. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-97188), filed September
2, 1995, as amended. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed December 5, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 12, 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 26, 2006. |
59
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File
No. 000-26966), filed August 3, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File
No. 000-26966), filed March 27, 2001. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
No. 000-26966), filed February 24, 2004. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001
(File No. 000-26966), filed May 9, 2001. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed February 3, 2005. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed May 31, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (File
No. 000-26966), filed August 9, 2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-26966), filed March 28, 2006. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed February 1, 2006. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26966), filed March 31, 2005. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed August 9, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 6, 2005. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(File No. 000-26966), filed November 7, 2005. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed October 7, 2005. |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 28, 2006. |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed May 1, 2007. |
|
* |
|
Compensation Plan |
|
+ |
|
Confidential treatment has been granted for portions of this agreement. |
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hans Georg Betz |
|
|
|
|
Hans Georg Betz
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hans Georg Betz
Hans Georg Betz |
|
Chief Executive Officer and President and Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawrence D. Firestone
Lawrence D. Firestone |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas S. Schatz
Douglas S. Schatz |
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard P. Beck
Richard P. Beck |
|
Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Trung Doan
Trung Doan |
|
Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Barry Z. Posner
Barry Z. Posner |
|
Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Tom Rohrs
Tom Rohrs |
|
Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Elwood Spedden
Elwood Spedden |
|
Director
|
|
March 18, 2008 |
61
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.(1) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-laws.(2) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amendment to By-laws.(3) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Specimen Certificate for Common Stock.(2) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated July 6, 2005, by and among Silicon Valley
Bank, as a bank, and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., as borrower.(4) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Loan Modification Agreement dated July 25, 2006, by and between Silicon
Valley Bank and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (5) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Loan Modification Agreement dated August 2, 2007, by and between Silicon
Valley Bank and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (6) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Lease, dated June 12, 1984, amended June 11, 1992, by and between Prospect
Park East Partnership and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for property
located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Lease, dated March 14, 1994, as amended, by and between Sharp Point
Properties, L.L.C., and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for property
located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Lease, dated May 19, 1995, by and between Sharp Point Properties, L.L.C. and
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a building located in Fort Collins,
Colorado.(2) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Lease dated March 20, 2000, by and between Sharp Point Properties, L.L.C.
and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a building located in Fort
Collins, Colorado.(7) |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Lease dated January 16, 2003, by and between China Great Wall Computer
Shenzhen Co., Ltd., Great Wall Limited and Advanced Energy Industries
(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., for a building located in Shenzhen, China.(8) |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.(2) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated through February 7, 2001.(9)* |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
through February 7, 2001.(9)* |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
2001 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
2002 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
2003 Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2003 Stock Option Plan, dated January 31, 2005.(10)* |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock Option Plan.(10)* |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Employees Stock Option Plan. (6)* |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.(1)* |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated.(6)* |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the 2003
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated as of
February 15, 2006. (11) * |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan. (12) * |
62
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock Option Plan.(13)* |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Non-employee Director Compensation summary.(14)* |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement.(15) |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Retirement Term Sheet relating to Douglas S. Schatz.(16) |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Offer Letter to Hans-Georg Betz dated June 30, 2005.(17) |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement dated June 30, 2005 by and between
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Hans-Georg Betz.(17) |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Global Supply Agreement by and between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Applied
Materials Inc. dated August 29, 2005.(18) + |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Shipping Amendment to the Global Supply Agreement by and between Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. and Applied Materials Inc. dated August 29, 2005.(18) + |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated October 3, 2005, by and between Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc. and MKS Instruments, Inc. and its subsidiary, Applied Science and Technology,
Inc.(19) |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Structure. (20) * |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
2006 Leadership Performance Incentive Plan. (12) * |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Advisory Services Agreement dated
as of October 26, 2007 by and between Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and Joseph R. Bronson. |
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of Ethical Conduct, as revised. (21) |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney.(15) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(File No. 000-26966), filed November 4, 2003. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-97188), filed September
2, 1995, as amended. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed December 5, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 12, 2005. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 26, 2006. |
63
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File
No. 000-26966), filed August 3, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File
No. 000-26966), filed March 27, 2001. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
No. 000-26966), filed February 24, 2004. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001
(File No. 000-26966), filed May 9, 2001. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed February 3, 2005. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed May 31, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (File
No. 000-26966), filed August 9, 2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-26966), filed March 28, 2006. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed February 1, 2006. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-26966), filed March 31, 2005. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed August 9, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 6, 2005. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
(File No. 000-26966), filed November 7, 2005. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed October 7, 2005. |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed July 28, 2006. |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-26966), filed May 1, 2007. |
|
* |
|
Compensation Plan |
|
+ |
|
Confidential treatment has been granted for portions of this agreement. |
64