Edgar Filing: BANK OF HAWAII CORP

Document

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period

ended March 31, 2019

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition

period from to

Commission File Number: 1-6887

BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		99-0148992
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

130 Merchant Street, Honolulu, Hawaii		96813
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

1-888-643-3888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
	Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of April 16, 2019, there were 40,988,012 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation

Form 10-Q

Index



		Page

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Income – Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	3

	Consolidated Statements of Condition – March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018	4

	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	48

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	77

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	77

Part II - Other Information

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	78

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	78

Item 6.	Exhibits	78

Signatures		79

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2019			2018
Interest Income
Interest and Fees on Loans and Leases	$	108,511		$	97,634
Income on Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale	13,432			12,141
Held-to-Maturity	21,921			21,296
Deposits	15			18
Funds Sold	1,444			757
Other	319			300
Total Interest Income	145,642			132,146
Interest Expense
Deposits	15,284			7,581
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	4,571			4,564
Funds Purchased	157			53
Short-Term Borrowings	36			16
Other Debt	757			976
Total Interest Expense	20,805			13,190
Net Interest Income	124,837			118,956
Provision for Credit Losses	3,000			4,125
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	121,837			114,831
Noninterest Income
Trust and Asset Management	10,761			11,181
Mortgage Banking	2,287			2,145
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	7,364			7,129
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges	14,208			14,333
Investment Securities Gains (Losses), Net	(835		)	(666		)
Annuity and Insurance	2,578			1,206
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	1,710			1,842
Other	5,606			6,865
Total Noninterest Income	43,679			44,035
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and Benefits	56,586			54,422
Net Occupancy	7,594			8,534
Net Equipment	6,833			5,527
Data Processing	4,526			3,891
Professional Fees	2,453			2,773
FDIC Insurance	1,269			2,157
Other	13,796			17,080
Total Noninterest Expense	93,057			94,384
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	72,459			64,482
Provision for Income Taxes	13,660			10,442
Net Income	$	58,799		$	54,040
Basic Earnings Per Share	$	1.44		$	1.29
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	1.43		$	1.28
Dividends Declared Per Share	$	0.62		$	0.52
Basic Weighted Average Shares	40,938,318			42,038,573
Diluted Weighted Average Shares	41,213,453			42,358,425

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019		2018
Net Income	$	58,799	$	54,040
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities	6,919		(9,121		)
Defined Benefit Plans	246		216
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	7,165		(8,905		)
Comprehensive Income	$	65,964	$	45,135

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Condition (Unaudited)



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks	$	3,550		$	3,028
Funds Sold	243,867			198,860
Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale	1,859,256			2,007,942
Held-to-Maturity (Fair Value of $3,637,496 and $3,413,994)	3,668,811			3,482,092
Loans Held for Sale	17,909			10,987
Loans and Leases	10,548,609			10,448,774
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	(106,023		)	(106,693		)
Net Loans and Leases	10,442,586			10,342,081
Total Earning Assets	16,235,979			16,044,990
Cash and Due From Banks	293,871			324,081
Premises and Equipment, Net	159,344			151,837
Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets	104,166			—
Accrued Interest Receivable	52,820			51,230
Foreclosed Real Estate	3,225			1,356
Mortgage Servicing Rights	24,149			24,310
Goodwill	31,517			31,517
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	285,155			283,771
Other Assets	256,187			230,882
Total Assets	$	17,446,413		$	17,143,974

Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-Bearing Demand	$	4,595,915		$	4,739,596
Interest-Bearing Demand	2,961,444			3,002,925
Savings	5,946,881			5,539,199
Time	1,763,070			1,745,522
Total Deposits	15,267,310			15,027,242
Short-Term Borrowings	—			199
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	504,299			504,296
Other Debt	110,624			135,643
Operating Lease Liabilities	111,230			—
Retirement Benefits Payable	40,343			40,494
Accrued Interest Payable	8,474			8,253
Taxes Payable and Deferred Taxes	29,935			19,736
Other Liabilities	104,508			139,911
Total Liabilities	16,176,723			15,875,774
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock ($.01 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued / outstanding: March 31, 2019 - 58,166,535 / 41,078,688 and December 31, 2018 - 58,063,689 / 41,499,898)	578			577
Capital Surplus	574,594			571,704
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	(43,878		)	(51,043		)
Retained Earnings	1,674,264			1,641,314
Treasury Stock, at Cost (Shares: March 31, 2019 - 17,087,847 and December 31, 2018 - 16,563,791)	(935,868		)	(894,352		)
Total Shareholders’ Equity	1,269,690			1,268,200
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	17,446,413		$	17,143,974

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)



(dollars in thousands)	Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Capital Surplus		Accum. Other Compre- hensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2018	41,499,898		$	577	$	571,704	$	(51,043	)	$	1,641,314		$	(894,352	)	$	1,268,200
Net Income	—		—		—		—			58,799			—			58,799
Other Comprehensive Income	—		—		—		7,165			—			—			7,165
Share-Based Compensation	—		—		2,274		—			—			—			2,274
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans	131,529		1		616		—			(203		)	1,673			2,087
Common Stock Repurchased	(552,739	)	—		—		—			—			(43,189		)	(43,189		)
Cash Dividends Declared ($0.62 per share)	—		—		—		—			(25,646		)	—			(25,646		)
Balance as of March 31, 2019	41,078,688		$	578	$	574,594	$	(43,878	)	$	1,674,264		$	(935,868	)	$	1,269,690

Balance as of December 31, 2017	42,401,443		$	576	$	561,161	$	(34,715	)	$	1,512,218		$	(807,372	)	$	1,231,868
Net Income	—		—		—		—			54,040			—			54,040
Other Comprehensive Loss	—		—		—		(8,905		)	—			—			(8,905		)
Reclassification of the Income Tax Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from AOCI	—		—		—		(7,477		)	7,477			—			—
Share-Based Compensation	—		—		1,867		—			—			—			1,867
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans	121,299		1		570		—			252			1,128			1,951
Common Stock Repurchased	(208,328	)	—		—		—			—			(17,541		)	(17,541		)
Cash Dividends Declared ($0.52 per share)	—		—		—		—			(22,087		)	—			(22,087		)
Balance as of March 31, 2018	42,314,414		$	577	$	563,598	$	(51,097	)	$	1,551,900		$	(823,785	)	$	1,241,193

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Operating Activities
Net Income	$	58,799		$	54,040
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Provision for Credit Losses	3,000			4,125
Depreciation and Amortization	3,996			3,339
Amortization of Deferred Loan and Lease Fees	(381		)	(151		)
Amortization and Accretion of Premiums/Discounts on Investment Securities, Net	5,290			8,966
Amortization of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets	3,185			—
Share-Based Compensation	2,274			1,867
Benefit Plan Contributions	(372		)	(375		)
Deferred Income Taxes	(2,363		)	(138		)
Gains on Sale of Premises and Equipment	(558		)	—
Net Gains on Sales of Loans and Leases	(1,065		)	(573		)
Net Losses (Gains) on Sales of Investment Securities	835			666
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale	56,453			66,003
Originations of Loans Held for Sale	(63,014		)	(70,290		)
Net Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation	530			767
Net Change in Other Assets and Other Liabilities	(49,491		)	6,632
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	17,118			74,878

Investing Activities
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:
Proceeds from Sales, Prepayments and Maturities	495,824			89,399
Purchases	(341,234		)	(59,160		)
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities	177,841			195,199
Purchases	(367,178		)	(59,598		)
Net Change in Loans and Leases	(104,120		)	(124,225		)
Purchases of Premises and Equipment	(11,583		)	(9,614		)
Proceeds from Sale of Premises and Equipment	639			—
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities	(149,811		)	32,001

Financing Activities
Net Change in Deposits	240,068			73,165
Net Change in Short-Term Borrowings	(196		)	—
Repayments of Long-Term Debt	(25,019		)	(25,000		)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock	1,994			1,959
Repurchase of Common Stock	(43,189		)	(17,541		)
Cash Dividends Paid	(25,646		)	(22,087		)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	148,012			10,496

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents	15,319			117,375
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	525,969			447,851
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	541,288		$	565,226
Supplemental Information
Cash Paid for Interest	$	20,583		$	11,908
Cash Paid for Income Taxes	2,764			961
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Initial Recognition of Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets	106,514			—
Initial Recognition of Operating Lease Liabilities	113,394			—
Transfer from Loans to Foreclosed Real Estate	1,869			1,728

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a Delaware corporation and a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. Bank of Hawaii Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) provide a broad range of financial products and services to customers in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific Islands. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries. The Parent’s principal operating subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).

The consolidated financial statements in this report have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year or for any future period.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and accompanying notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements.

Variable Interest Entities

Variable interests are defined as contractual ownership or other interests in an entity that change with fluctuations in an entity’s net asset value. The primary beneficiary consolidates the variable interest entity (“VIE”). The primary beneficiary is defined as the enterprise that has both (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE.

The Company has limited partnership interests in several low-income housing partnerships. These partnerships provide funds for the construction and operation of apartment complexes that provide affordable housing to lower-income households. If these developments successfully attract a specified percentage of residents falling in that lower-income range, state and/or federal income tax credits are made available to the partners. The tax credits are generally recognized over 10 years. In order to continue receiving the tax credits each year over the life of the partnership, the low-income residency targets must be maintained.

Prior to January 1, 2015, the Company utilized the effective yield method whereby the Company recognized tax credits generally over 10 years and amortized the initial cost of the investment to provide a constant effective yield over the period that tax credits are allocated to the Company. On January 1, 2015, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-01, “Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects” prospectively for new investments. ASU No. 2014-01 permits reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. As permitted by ASU No. 2014-01, the Company elected to continue to utilize the effective yield method for investments made prior to January 1, 2015.

Table of Contents

Unfunded commitments to fund these low-income housing partnerships were $13.2 million and $15.2 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. These unfunded commitments are unconditional and legally binding and are recorded in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. See Note 6 Affordable Housing Projects Tax Credit Partnerships for more information.

The Company also has limited partnership interests in solar energy tax credit partnership investments. These partnerships develop, build, own and operate solar renewable energy projects. Over the course of these investments, the Company expects to receive federal and state tax credits, tax-related benefits, and excess cash available for distribution, if any. The Company may be called to sell its interest in the limited partnerships through a call option once all investment tax credits have been recognized. Tax benefits associated with these investments are generally recognized over six years.

These entities meet the definition of a VIE; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the entities as the general partner has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entities and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entities. While the partnership agreements allow the limited partners, through a majority vote, to remove the general partner, this right is not deemed to be substantive as the general partner can only be removed for cause.

The investments in these entities are initially recorded at cost, which approximates the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company’s involvement with these unconsolidated entities. The balance of the Company’s investments in these entities was $82.4 million and $85.9 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2019

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases.” Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases): 1) a lease liability, which is the present value of a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessor accounting under the new guidance remains largely unchanged as it is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. Leveraged leases have been eliminated, although lessors can continue to account for existing leveraged leases using the current accounting guidance. Other limited changes were made to align lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the new revenue recognition standard. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures will be required by lessees and lessors to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The intention is to require enough information to supplement the amounts recorded in the financial statements so that users can understand more about the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. All entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. As the Company elected the transition option provided in ASU No. 2018-11 (see below), the modified retrospective approach was applied on January 1, 2019 (as opposed to January 1, 2017). The Company also elected certain relief options offered in ASU 2016-02 including the package of practical expedients, the option not to separate lease and non-lease components and instead to account for them as a single lease component, and the option not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (i.e., leases with terms of twelve months or less). The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which allows entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of right-of-use assets. The Company has several lease agreements, such as branch locations, which are considered operating leases, and therefore, were not previously recognized on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition. The new guidance requires these lease agreements to be recognized on the consolidated statements of condition as a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income or the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 16 Leases for more information.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” This ASU’s objectives are to (1) improve the transparency and understandability of information conveyed to financial statement users about an entity’s risk management activities by better aligning the entity’s financial reporting for hedging relationships with those risk management activities; and (2) reduce the complexity of and simplify the application of hedge accounting by preparers. ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company currently does not designate any derivative financial instruments as formal hedging relationships, and therefore, does not currently utilize hedge accounting. As such, ASU No. 2017-12 did not impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, “Leases - Targeted Improvements” to provide entities with relief from the costs of implementing certain aspects of the new leasing standard, ASU No. 2016-02. Specifically, under the amendments in ASU 2018-11: (1) entities may elect not to recast the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new leasing standard, and (2) lessors may elect not to separate lease and non-lease components when certain conditions are met. The amendments have the same effective date as ASU 2016-02 (January 1, 2019 for the Company). The Company adopted ASU 2018-11 on its required effective date of January 1, 2019 and elected both transition options mentioned above. ASU 2018-11 did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20, “Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors.” This ASU (1) allows lessors to make an accounting policy election of presenting sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees on a net basis, (2) requires a lessor to exclude lessor costs paid directly by a lessee to third parties on the lessor’s behalf and include lessor costs that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee in the measurement of variable lease revenue and the associated expense, and (3) clarifies that when lessors allocate variable payments to lease and non-lease components they are required to follow the recognition guidance in the new leases standard for the lease component and other applicable guidance, such as the new revenue standard, for the non-lease component. The Company adopted ASU 2018-20 on its required effective date of January 1, 2019 and elected to present sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees on a net basis as described in (1) above. ASU 2018-20 did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, “Leases: Codification Improvements.” This ASU (1) states that for lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers, the fair value of the underlying asset is its cost, less any volume or trade discounts, as long as there isn’t a significant amount of time between acquisition of the asset and lease commencement; (2) clarifies that lessors in the scope of ASC 942 (such as the Company) must classify principal payments received from sales-type and direct financing leases in investing activities in the statement of cash flows; and (3) clarifies the transition guidance related to certain interim disclosures provided in the year of adoption. To coincide with the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2019-01 on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting Standards Pending Adoption

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” approach known as current expected credit loss (“CECL”), which will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL approach will not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the credit losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and the Company is planning to adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2020. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company is continuing its implementation efforts through its Company-wide implementation team. This team has assigned roles and responsibilities, key tasks to complete, and a general timeline to be followed. The team meets periodically to discuss the latest developments and ensure progress is being made. The team has been working with an advisory consultant and is finalizing the methodologies that will be utilized, which will be followed by developing and documenting processes, controls, policies and disclosure requirements in preparation for performing a full parallel run. The Company’s preliminary evaluation indicates the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 are expected to impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, in particular the level of the reserve for credit losses. The Company is continuing to evaluate the extent of the potential impact and expects that portfolio composition and economic conditions at the time of adoption will be a factor.

Table of Contents

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” This ASU eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Among the changes, entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. As ASU No. 2018-13 only revises disclosure requirements, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents reported within the consolidated statements of condition that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks	$	3,550	$	3,028
Funds Sold	243,867		198,860
Cash and Due From Banks	293,871		324,081
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	541,288	$	525,969

Table of Contents

Note 3. Investment Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of the Company’s investment securities as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
March 31, 2019
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	365,787	$	450	$	(2,515	)	$	363,722
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	173,002		3,738		(11		)	176,729
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	189		1		—			190
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	224,998		59		(1,074		)	223,983
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	396,578		3,582		(1,196		)	398,964
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	560,506		3,328		(8,591		)	555,243
Commercial - Government Agencies	143,396		982		(3,953		)	140,425
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	1,100,480		7,892		(13,740		)	1,094,632
Total	$	1,864,456	$	12,140	$	(17,340	)	$	1,859,256
Held-to-Maturity:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	353,298	$	645	$	(603	)	$	353,340
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	233,609		7,287		—			240,896
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	93,393		17		(1,306		)	92,104
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	1,803,146		6,771		(32,071		)	1,777,846
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	1,010,892		4,599		(11,013		)	1,004,478
Commercial - Government Agencies	174,473		336		(5,977		)	168,832
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	2,988,511		11,706		(49,061		)	2,951,156
Total	$	3,668,811	$	19,655	$	(50,970	)	$	3,637,496

December 31, 2018
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	394,485	$	493	$	(2,577	)	$	392,401
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	559,800		5,227		(1,031		)	563,996
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	56		—		—			56
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	224,997		—		(1,857		)	223,140
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	189,645		1,726		(929		)	190,442
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	589,311		1,779		(12,563		)	578,527
Commercial - Government Agencies	63,864		—		(4,484		)	59,380
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	842,820		3,505		(17,976		)	828,349
Total	$	2,022,158	$	9,225	$	(23,441	)	$	2,007,942
Held-to-Maturity:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	353,122	$	186	$	(1,093	)	$	352,215
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	234,602		6,150		—			240,752
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	97,266		—		(1,755		)	95,511
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	1,861,874		3,886		(51,773		)	1,813,987
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	758,835		1,590		(20,259		)	740,166
Commercial - Government Agencies	176,393		147		(5,177		)	171,363
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	2,797,102		5,623		(77,209		)	2,725,516
Total	$	3,482,092	$	11,959	$	(80,057	)	$	3,413,994

Table of Contents

The table below presents an analysis of the contractual maturities of the Company’s investment securities as of March 31, 2019. Debt securities issued by government agencies (Small Business Administration securities) and mortgage-backed securities are disclosed separately in the table below as these investment securities may prepay prior to their scheduled contractual maturity dates.



(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Available-for-Sale:
Due in One Year or Less	$	127,598	$	127,372
Due After One Year Through Five Years	182,056		182,631
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years	66,783		68,353
Due After Ten Years	22,747		23,538
	399,184		401,894

Debt Securities Issued by Government Agencies	364,792		362,730
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	396,578		398,964
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	560,506		555,243
Commercial - Government Agencies	143,396		140,425
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	1,100,480		1,094,632
Total	$	1,864,456	$	1,859,256

Held-to-Maturity:
Due in One Year or Less	$	179,808	$	179,302
Due After One Year Through Five Years	311,027		314,416
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years	181,768		184,499
Due After Ten Years	7,697		8,123
	680,300		686,340
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	1,803,146		1,777,846
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	1,010,892		1,004,478
Commercial - Government Agencies	174,473		168,832
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	2,988,511		2,951,156
Total	$	3,668,811	$	3,637,496

Investment securities with carrying values of $2.2 billion and $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, were pledged to secure deposits of governmental entities and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

The table below presents the gains and losses from the sales of investment securities for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Gross Gains on Sales of Investment Securities	$	2,030		$	—
Gross Losses on Sales of Investment Securities	(2,865		)	(666		)
Net Gains (Losses) on Sales of Investment Securities	$	(835	)	$	(666	)

The gross losses on sales of investment securities during the three months ended March 31, 2019 included losses on sales of municipal debt securities and mortgage-backed securities as part of a portfolio repositioning. In addition, fees paid to the counterparties of our prior Visa Class B share sale transactions which are expensed as incurred also contributed to the losses during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

The Company’s gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:



	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
March 31, 2019
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	19,783	$	(80	)	$	290,176	$	(2,435	)	$	309,959	$	(2,515	)
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		—			7,314		(11		)	7,314		(11		)
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	75		—			—		—			75		—
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	—		—			163,923		(1,074		)	163,923		(1,074		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	119,098		(354		)	17,720		(842		)	136,818		(1,196		)
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	13,444		(29		)	403,072		(8,562		)	416,516		(8,591		)
Commercial - Government Agencies	—		—			58,643		(3,953		)	58,643		(3,953		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	132,542		(383		)	479,435		(13,357		)	611,977		(13,740		)
Total	$	152,400	$	(463	)	$	940,848	$	(16,877	)	$	1,093,248	$	(17,340	)
Held-to-Maturity:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	—	$	—		$	129,299	$	(603	)	$	129,299	$	(603	)
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	—		—			72,951		(1,306		)	72,951		(1,306		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	921		(1		)	1,368,236		(32,070		)	1,369,157		(32,071		)
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		—			550,564		(11,013		)	550,564		(11,013		)
Commercial - Government Agencies	—		—			143,052		(5,977		)	143,052		(5,977		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	921		(1		)	2,061,852		(49,060		)	2,062,773		(49,061		)
Total	$	921	$	(1	)	$	2,264,102	$	(50,969	)	$	2,265,023	$	(50,970	)

December 31, 2018
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	157,058	$	(964	)	$	173,763	$	(1,613	)	$	330,821	$	(2,577	)
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	38,138		(59		)	156,772		(972		)	194,910		(1,031		)
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	59,770		(231		)	163,371		(1,626		)	223,141		(1,857		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	6,299		(10		)	19,011		(919		)	25,310		(929		)
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		—			473,380		(12,563		)	473,380		(12,563		)
Commercial - Government Agencies	—		—			59,380		(4,484		)	59,380		(4,484		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	6,299		(10		)	551,771		(17,966		)	558,070		(17,976		)
Total	$	261,265	$	(1,264	)	$	1,045,677	$	(22,177	)	$	1,306,942	$	(23,441	)
Held-to-Maturity:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	99,440	$	(237	)	$	134,239	$	(856	)	$	233,679	$	(1,093	)
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	—		—			95,511		(1,755		)	95,511		(1,755		)
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	12,974		(45		)	1,491,747		(51,728		)	1,504,721		(51,773		)
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		—			617,000		(20,259		)	617,000		(20,259		)
Commercial - Government Agencies	19,217		(61		)	145,715		(5,116		)	164,932		(5,177		)
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	32,191		(106		)	2,254,462		(77,103		)	2,286,653		(77,209		)
Total	$	131,631	$	(343	)	$	2,484,212	$	(79,714	)	$	2,615,843	$	(80,057	)

Table of Contents

The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2019, which were comprised of 392 individual securities, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. Total gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the gross unrealized losses reported for mortgage-backed securities were mostly related to investment securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association. The Company does not intend to sell the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity.

Interest income from taxable and non-taxable investment securities for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019		2018
Taxable	$	31,992	$	28,671
Non-Taxable	3,361		4,766
Total Interest Income from Investment Securities	$	35,353	$	33,437

As of March 31, 2019, included in the Company’s investment securities portfolio were debt securities issued by political subdivisions within the State of Hawaii of $408.8 million, representing 98% of the total fair value of the Company’s municipal debt securities. Of the entire Hawaii municipal bond portfolio, 94% were credit-rated Aa2 or better by Moody’s. Most of the remaining Hawaii municipal bonds were credit-rated A1 or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Of the Company’s total Hawaii municipal bond holdings, 80% were general obligation issuances.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the carrying value of the Company’s Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock was as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	$	14,000	$	15,000
Federal Reserve Bank Stock	20,970		20,858
Total	$	34,970	$	35,858

These securities can only be redeemed or sold at their par value and only to the respective issuing institution or to another member institution. The Company records these non-marketable equity securities as a component of other assets and periodically evaluates these securities for impairment. Management considers these non-marketable equity securities to be long-term investments. Accordingly, when evaluating these securities for impairment, management considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value.

Visa Class B Restricted Shares

In 2008, the Company received Visa Class B restricted shares as part of Visa’s initial public offering. These shares are transferable only under limited circumstances until they can be converted into the publicly traded Class A common shares. This conversion will not occur until the settlement of certain litigation which will be indemnified by Visa members, including the Company. Visa funded an escrow account from its initial public offering to settle these litigation claims. Should this escrow account be insufficient to cover these litigation claims, Visa is entitled to fund additional amounts to the escrow account by reducing each member bank’s Class B conversion ratio to unrestricted Class A shares. As of March 31, 2019, the conversion ratio was 1.6298. See Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments for more information.

The Company occasionally sells these Visa Class B shares to other financial institutions. Concurrent with every sale the Company enters into an agreement with the buyer that requires payment to the buyer in the event Visa further reduces the conversion ratio. Based on the existing transfer restriction and the uncertainty of the outcome of the Visa litigation mentioned above, the remaining 83,014 Class B shares (135,296 Class A equivalents) that the Company owns as of March 31, 2019 are carried at a zero cost basis.

Table of Contents

Note 4. Loans and Leases and the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

Loans and Leases

The Company’s loan and lease portfolio was comprised of the following as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,331,345	$	1,331,149
Commercial Mortgage	2,381,213		2,302,356
Construction	132,775		170,061
Lease Financing	154,919		176,226
Total Commercial	4,000,252		3,979,792
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	3,702,553		3,673,796
Home Equity	1,698,666		1,681,442
Automobile	676,730		658,133
Other ¹	470,408		455,611
Total Consumer	6,548,357		6,468,982
Total Loans and Leases	$	10,548,609	$	10,448,774


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

The majority of the Company’s lending activity is with customers located in the State of Hawaii. A substantial portion of the Company’s real estate loans are secured by real estate in Hawaii.

Net gains related to sales of residential mortgage loans, recorded as a component of mortgage banking income were $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the “Allowance”)

The following presents by portfolio segment, the activity in the Allowance for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. The following also presents by portfolio segment, the balance in the Allowance disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment measurement method and the related recorded investment in loans and leases as of March 31, 2019 and 2018.



(dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Consumer			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	66,874		$	39,819		$	106,693
Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(1,986		)	(4,842		)	(6,828		)
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	501			2,657			3,158
Net Loans and Leases Recovered (Charged-Off)	(1,485		)	(2,185		)	(3,670		)
Provision for Credit Losses	2,138			862			3,000
Balance at End of Period	$	67,527		$	38,496		$	106,023
As of March 31, 2019
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	181		$	3,448		$	3,629
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	67,346			35,048			102,394
Total	67,527			38,496			106,023
Recorded Investment in Loans and Leases:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	15,627		$	42,369		$	57,996
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	3,984,625			6,505,988			10,490,613
Total	$	4,000,252		$	6,548,357		$	10,548,609

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	65,822		$	41,524		$	107,346
Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(206		)	(5,782		)	(5,988		)
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	328			2,127			2,455
Net Loans and Leases Recovered (Charged-Off)	122			(3,655		)	(3,533		)
Provision for Credit Losses	(1,834		)	5,959			4,125
Balance at End of Period	$	64,110		$	43,828		$	107,938
As of March 31, 2018
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	59		$	3,783		$	3,842
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	64,051			40,045			104,096
Total	$	64,110		$	43,828		$	107,938
Recorded Investment in Loans and Leases:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	21,095		$	40,727		$	61,822
Collectively Evaluated for Impairment	3,771,641			6,083,165			9,854,806
Total	$	3,792,736		$	6,123,892		$	9,916,628

Table of Contents

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company uses several credit quality indicators to manage credit risk in an ongoing manner. The Company uses an internal credit risk rating system that categorizes loans and leases into pass, special mention, or classified categories. Credit risk ratings are applied individually to those classes of loans and leases that have significant or unique credit characteristics that benefit from a case-by-case evaluation. These are typically loans and leases to businesses or individuals in the classes which comprise the commercial portfolio segment. Groups of loans and leases that are underwritten and structured using standardized criteria and characteristics, such as statistical models (e.g., credit scoring or payment performance), are typically risk-rated and monitored collectively. These are typically loans and leases to individuals in the classes which comprise the consumer portfolio segment.

The following are the definitions of the Company’s credit quality indicators:


Pass:	Loans and leases in all classes within the commercial and consumer portfolio segments that are not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreement. Management believes that there is a low likelihood of loss related to those loans and leases that are considered Pass.


Special Mention:	Loans and leases that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If not addressed, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or lease. Management believes that there is a moderate likelihood of some loss related to those loans and leases that are considered Special Mention.

Classified:

Loans and leases in the classes within the commercial portfolio segment that are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Classified loans and leases are also those in the classes within the consumer portfolio segment that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest. Residential mortgage loans that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest may be considered Pass if the Company is in the process of collection and the current loan-to-value ratio is 60% or less. Home equity loans that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest may be considered Pass if the Company is in the process of collection, the first mortgage is with the Company, and the current combined loan-to-value ratio is 60% or less. Residential mortgage and home equity loans may be current as to principal and interest, but may be considered Classified for a period of generally up to six months following a loan modification. Following a period of demonstrated performance in accordance with the modified contractual terms, the loan may be removed from Classified status. Management believes that there is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies related to Classified loans and leases are not corrected in a timely manner.

Table of Contents

The Company’s credit quality indicators are periodically updated on a case-by-case basis. The following presents by class and by credit quality indicator, the recorded investment in the Company’s loans and leases as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



	March 31, 2019
(dollars in thousands)	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Mortgage		Construction		Lease Financing		Total Commercial
Pass	$	1,296,226	$	2,309,833	$	131,481	$	153,911	$	3,891,451
Special Mention	18,080		56,233		—		4		74,317
Classified	17,039		15,147		1,294		1,004		34,484
Total	$	1,331,345	$	2,381,213	$	132,775	$	154,919	$	4,000,252

(dollars in thousands)	Residential Mortgage		Home Equity		Automobile		Other ¹		Total Consumer
Pass	$	3,696,769	$	1,695,120	$	675,996	$	469,375	$	6,537,260
Classified	5,784		3,546		734		1,033		11,097
Total	$	3,702,553	$	1,698,666	$	676,730	$	470,408	$	6,548,357
Total Recorded Investment in Loans and Leases									$	10,548,609



	December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Mortgage		Construction		Lease Financing		Total Commercial
Pass	$	1,302,278	$	2,256,128	$	168,740	$	175,223	$	3,902,369
Special Mention	17,688		30,468		—		5		48,161
Classified	11,183		15,760		1,321		998		29,262
Total	$	1,331,149	$	2,302,356	$	170,061	$	176,226	$	3,979,792

(dollars in thousands)	Residential Mortgage		Home Equity		Automobile		Other¹		Total Consumer
Pass	$	3,668,475	$	1,677,193	$	657,620	$	454,697	$	6,457,985
Classified	5,321		4,249		513		914		10,997
Total	$	3,673,796	$	1,681,442	$	658,133	$	455,611	$	6,468,982
Total Recorded Investment in Loans and Leases									$	10,448,774


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Table of Contents

Aging Analysis

The following presents by class, an aging analysis of the Company’s loan and lease portfolio as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



(dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		Past Due 90 Days or More		Non-Accrual		Total Past Due and Non-Accrual		Current		Total Loans and Leases		Non-Accrual Loans and Leases that are Current ²
As of March 31, 2019
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	7,123	$	10	$	66	$	393	$	7,592	$	1,323,753	$	1,331,345	$	265
Commercial Mortgage	2,674		—		—		5,911		8,585		2,372,628		2,381,213		5,911
Construction	200		—		—		—		200		132,575		132,775		—
Lease Financing	—		—		—		—		—		154,919		154,919		—
Total Commercial	9,997		10		66		6,304		16,377		3,983,875		4,000,252		6,176
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	5,270		183		903		5,599		11,955		3,690,598		3,702,553		986
Home Equity	3,791		917		3,381		2,797		10,886		1,687,780		1,698,666		787
Automobile	9,585		1,640		734		—		11,959		664,771		676,730		—
Other ¹	2,161		1,160		1,033		—		4,354		466,054		470,408		—
Total Consumer	20,807		3,900		6,051		8,396		39,154		6,509,203		6,548,357		1,773
Total	$	30,804	$	3,910	$	6,117	$	14,700	$	55,531	$	10,493,078	$	10,548,609	$	7,949

As of December 31, 2018
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	3,653	$	118	$	10	$	542	$	4,323	$	1,326,826	$	1,331,149	$	515
Commercial Mortgage	561		—		—		2,040		2,601		2,299,755		2,302,356		2,040
Construction	—		—		—		—		—		170,061		170,061		—
Lease Financing	—		—		—		—		—		176,226		176,226		—
Total Commercial	4,214		118		10		2,582		6,924		3,972,868		3,979,792		2,555
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	5,319		638		2,446		5,321		13,724		3,660,072		3,673,796		1,203
Home Equity	3,323		1,581		2,684		3,671		11,259		1,670,183		1,681,442		765
Automobile	12,372		2,240		513		—		15,125		643,008		658,133		—
Other ¹	2,913		1,245		914		—		5,072		450,539		455,611		—
Total Consumer	23,927		5,704		6,557		8,992		45,180		6,423,802		6,468,982		1,968
Total	$	28,141	$	5,822	$	6,567	$	11,574	$	52,104	$	10,396,670	$	10,448,774	$	4,523


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.


²	Represents non-accrual loans that are not past due 30 days or more; however, full payment of principal and interest is still not expected.

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans

The following presents by class, information related to impaired loans as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



(dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance for Loan Losses
March 31, 2019
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	5,171	$	5,171	$	—
Commercial Mortgage	5,856		10,972		—
Construction	1,294		1,294		—
Total Commercial	12,321		17,437		—
Total Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded	$	12,321	$	17,437	$	—

Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,514	$	1,745	$	102
Commercial Mortgage	1,792		1,792		79
Total Commercial	3,306		3,537		181
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	19,313		23,195		2,777
Home Equity	3,281		3,281		350
Automobile	17,784		17,784		273
Other ¹	1,991		1,991		48
Total Consumer	42,369		46,251		3,448
Total Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded	$	45,675	$	49,788	$	3,629

Impaired Loans:
Commercial	$	15,627	$	20,974	$	181
Consumer	42,369		46,251		3,448
Total Impaired Loans	$	57,996	$	67,225	$	3,629

December 31, 2018
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	4,587	$	4,587	$	—
Commercial Mortgage	2,712		6,212		—
Construction	1,321		1,321		—
Total Commercial	8,620		12,120		—
Total Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded	$	8,620	$	12,120	$	—

Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,856	$	2,099	$	130
Commercial Mortgage	1,822		1,822		92
Total Commercial	3,678		3,921		222
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	19,753		23,635		3,051
Home Equity	3,359		3,359		350
Automobile	17,117		17,117		296
Other ¹	2,098		2,098		57
Total Consumer	42,327		46,209		3,754
Total Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded	$	46,005	$	50,130	$	3,976

Impaired Loans:
Commercial	$	12,298	$	16,041	$	222
Consumer	42,327		46,209		3,754
Total Impaired Loans	$	54,625	$	62,250	$	3,976

¹ Comprised of other revolving credit and installment financing.

Table of Contents

The following presents by class, information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019				Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	4,879	$	85	$	8,538	$	113
Commercial Mortgage	4,284		16		9,097		87
Construction	1,308		21		1,407		23
Total Commercial	10,471		122		19,042		223
Total Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded	$	10,471	$	122	$	19,042	$	223

Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded:
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,685	$	21	$	890	$	10
Commercial Mortgage	1,807		2		724		3
Total Commercial	3,492		23		1,614		13
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	19,533		196		20,990		212
Home Equity	3,320		38		1,959		25
Automobile	17,451		295		15,219		261
Other ¹	2,045		42		2,697		52
Total Consumer	42,349		571		40,865		550
Total Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded	$	45,841	$	594	$	42,479	$	563

Impaired Loans:
Commercial	$	13,963	$	145	$	20,656	$	236
Consumer	42,349		571		40,865		550
Total Impaired Loans	$	56,312	$	716	$	61,521	$	786


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit and installment financing.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the amounts of interest income recognized by the Company within the periods that the loans were impaired were primarily related to loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring that remained on accrual status. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the amount of interest income recognized using a cash-basis method of accounting during the periods that the loans were impaired was not material.

Modifications

A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Loans modified in a TDR were $57.6 million and $54.0 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. There were $0.1 million and $0.2 million commitments to lend additional funds on loans modified in a TDR as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

The Company offers various types of concessions when modifying a loan or lease. Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting revolving credit lines to term loans. Additional collateral, a co-borrower, or a guarantor is often requested. Commercial mortgage and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or substituting or adding a co-borrower or guarantor. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period. Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR generally include a lower interest rate and the loan being fully amortized for up to 40 years from the modification effective date. In some cases, the Company may forbear a portion of the unpaid principal balance with a balloon payment due upon maturity or pay-off of the loan. Land loans are also included in the class of residential mortgage loans. Land loans are typically structured as interest-only monthly payments with a balloon payment due at maturity. Land loan modifications usually involve extending the interest-only monthly payments up to an additional five years with a balloon payment due at maturity, or re-amortizing the remaining balance over a period up to 360 months. Interest rates are not changed for land loan modifications. Home equity modifications are made infrequently and uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of each borrower. Automobile loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where the Company has lowered monthly payments by extending the term.

Loans modified in a TDR are typically already on non-accrual status and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance. As a result, loans modified in a TDR may have the financial effect of increasing the specific Allowance associated with the loan. An Allowance for impaired commercial and consumer loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Management exercises significant judgment in developing these estimates.

The following presents by class, information related to loans modified in a TDR during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Loans Modified as a TDR for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019							Loans Modified as a TDR for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
			Recorded			Increase in				Recorded			Increase in
Troubled Debt Restructurings	Number of		Investment			Allowance		Number of		Investment			Allowance
(dollars in thousands)	Contracts	(as of period end)¹			(as of period end)			Contracts	(as of period end)¹			(as of period end)
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	3		$	111		$	5	1		$	503		$	—
Commercial Mortgage	1		3,907			—		—		—			—
Total Commercial	4		4,018			5		1		503			—
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	—		—			—		1		112			—
Automobile	117		2,240			34		98		2,179			47
Other ²	39		229			6		80		547			14
Total Consumer	156		2,469			40		179		2,838			61
Total	160		$	6,487		$	45	180		$	3,341		$	61


¹	The period end balances reflect all paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. TDRs fully paid-off, charged-off, or foreclosed upon by period end are not included.


²	Comprised of other revolving credit and installment financing.

Table of Contents

The following presents by class, all loans modified in a TDR that defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, and within twelve months of their modification date. A TDR is considered to be in default once it becomes 60 days or more past due following a modification.



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019			Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
TDRs that Defaulted During the Period,		Recorded		Recorded
Within Twelve Months of their Modification Date	Number of	Investment		Number of	Investment
(dollars in thousands)	Contracts	(as of period end)¹		Contracts	(as of period end)¹
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	—	$	—	1	$	29
Commercial Mortgage	—	—		1	341
Total Commercial	—	—		2	370

Consumer
Home Equity	—	$	—	1	$	236
Automobile	14	266		25	435
Other ²	19	125		32	215
Total Consumer	33	391		58	886
Total	33	$	391	60	$	1,256


¹	The period end balances reflect all paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. TDRs fully paid-off, charged-off, or foreclosed upon by period end are not included.


²	Comprised of other revolving credit and installment financing.

Commercial and consumer loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Company evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The specific Allowance associated with the loan may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the Allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.

Foreclosure Proceedings

Consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure totaled $1.2 million as of March 31, 2019.

Note 5. Mortgage Servicing Rights

The Company’s portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $2.9 billion as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Substantially all of these loans were originated by the Company and sold to third parties on a non-recourse basis with servicing rights retained. These retained servicing rights are recorded as a servicing asset and are initially recorded at fair value (see Note 14 Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities for more information). Changes to the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded in mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

The Company’s mortgage servicing activities include collecting principal, interest, and escrow payments from borrowers; making tax and insurance payments on behalf of borrowers; monitoring delinquencies and executing foreclosure proceedings; and accounting for and remitting principal and interest payments to investors. Servicing income, including late and ancillary fees, was $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Servicing income is recorded in mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. The Company’s residential mortgage investor loan servicing portfolio is primarily comprised of fixed rate loans concentrated in Hawaii.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the change in the carrying value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the fair value measurement method was as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	1,290		$	1,454
Change in Fair Value:
Due to Payoffs	(22		)	(50		)
Total Changes in Fair Value of Mortgage Servicing Rights	(22		)	(50		)
Balance at End of Period	$	1,268		$	1,404

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the change in the carrying value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the amortization method was as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	23,020		$	23,168
Servicing Rights that Resulted From Asset Transfers	551			621
Amortization	(690		)	(700		)
Balance at End of Period	$	22,881		$	23,089

Fair Value of Mortgage Servicing Rights Accounted for Under the Amortization Method
Beginning of Period	$	29,218		$	26,716
End of Period	$	26,814		$	28,600

The key data and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:



	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Weighted-Average Constant Prepayment Rate ¹	8.62	%	7.01	%
Weighted-Average Life (in years)	7.08		7.89
Weighted-Average Note Rate	4.06	%	4.06	%
Weighted-Average Discount Rate ²	8.57	%	9.59	%


¹	Represents annualized loan prepayment rate assumption.


²	Derived from multiple interest rate scenarios that incorporate a spread to a market yield curve and market volatilities.

A sensitivity analysis of the Company’s fair value of mortgage servicing rights to changes in certain key assumptions as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is presented in the following table.



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Constant Prepayment Rate
Decrease in fair value from 25 basis points (“bps”) adverse change	$	(322	)	$	(361	)
Decrease in fair value from 50 bps adverse change	(640		)	(716		)
Discount Rate
Decrease in fair value from 25 bps adverse change	(288		)	(325		)
Decrease in fair value from 50 bps adverse change	(569		)	(643		)

This analysis generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of a change in one key assumption to the change in the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights usually is not linear. Also, the effect of changing one key assumption without changing other assumptions is not realistic.

Note 6. Affordable Housing Projects Tax Credit Partnerships

The Company makes equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, to facilitate the sale of affordable housing product offerings, and to assist in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally, these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity.

The Company is a limited partner in each LIHTC limited partnership. Each limited partnership is managed by an unrelated third party general partner who exercises significant control over the affairs of the limited partnership. The general partner has all the rights, powers and authority granted or permitted to be granted to a general partner of a limited partnership. Duties entrusted to the general partner of each limited partnership include, but are not limited to: investment in operating companies, company expenditures, investment of excess funds, borrowing funds, employment of agents, disposition of fund property, prepayment and refinancing of liabilities, votes and consents, contract authority, disbursement of funds, accounting methods,

Table of Contents

tax elections, bank accounts, insurance, litigation, cash reserve, and use of working capital reserve funds. Except for limited rights granted to the limited partner(s) relating to the approval of certain transactions, the limited partner(s) may not participate in the operation, management, or control of the limited partnership’s business, transact any business in the limited partnership’s name or have any power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the limited partnership. In addition, the general partner may only be removed by the limited partner(s) in the event the general partner fails to comply with the terms of the agreement or is negligent in performing its duties.

The general partner of each limited partnership has both the power to direct the activities which most significantly affect the performance of each partnership and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entities. Therefore, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any LIHTC partnership. The Company uses the effective yield method to account for its pre-2015 investments in these entities. Beginning January 1, 2015, any new investments that meet the requirements of the proportional amortization method are recognized using the proportional amortization method. The Company’s net affordable housing tax credit investments and related unfunded commitments were $71.2 million and $73.7 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and are included in other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

Unfunded Commitments

As of March 31, 2019, the expected payments for unfunded affordable housing commitments were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	Amount
2019	$	3,505
2020	8,317
2021	42
2022	49
2023	42
Thereafter	1,281
Total Unfunded Commitments	$	13,236

The following table presents tax credits and other tax benefits recognized and amortization expense related to affordable housing for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019		2018
Effective Yield Method
Tax credits and other tax benefits recognized	$	2,930	$	3,432
Amortization Expense in Provision for Income Taxes	1,891		2,078

Proportional Amortization Method
Tax credits and other tax benefits recognized	$	753	$	410
Amortization Expense in Provision for Income Taxes	645		333

There were no impairment losses related to LIHTC investments during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. During the first quarter 2018 the Company recorded a $2.0 million adjustment to increase its LIHTC investments. This

adjustment resulted in a decrease to the provision for income tax.

Table of Contents

Note 7. Balance Sheet Offsetting

Interest Rate Swap Agreements (“Swap Agreements”)

The Company enters into swap agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers. The Company mitigates the risk of entering into these agreements by entering into equal and offsetting swap agreements with highly-rated third party financial institutions. The swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition (asset positions are included in other assets and liability positions are included in other liabilities). The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all swap agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Collateral, usually in the form of cash or marketable securities, is posted by the party (i.e., the Company or the financial institution counterparty) with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds. The Company had net liability positions with its financial institution counterparties totaling $1.9 million and $0.3 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. See Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments for more information.

Parties to a centrally cleared over-the-counter derivative exchange daily payments that reflect the daily change in value of the derivative. Effective 2017, these payments, commonly referred to as variation margin, are recorded as settlements of the derivatives’ mark-to-market exposure rather than collateral against the exposures. This rule change effectively results in any centrally cleared derivative having a fair value that approximates zero on a daily basis, and therefore, these swap agreements were not included in the offsetting table at the end of this section. See Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments for more information.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase (“Repurchase Agreements”)

The Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets. As a result, these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as sales and subsequent repurchases of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition, while the securities underlying the repurchase agreements remain in the respective investment securities asset accounts. As a result, there is no offsetting or netting of the investment securities assets with the repurchase agreement liabilities. In addition, as the Company does not enter into reverse repurchase agreements, there is no such offsetting to be done with the repurchase agreements.

The right of setoff for a repurchase agreement resembles a secured borrowing, whereby the collateral pledged by the Company would be used to settle the fair value of the repurchase agreement should the Company be in default (e.g., fail to make an interest payment to the counterparty). For private institution repurchase agreements, if the private institution counterparty were to default (e.g., declare bankruptcy), the Company could cancel the repurchase agreement (i.e., cease payment of principal and interest) and attempt collection on the amount of collateral value in excess of the repurchase agreement fair value. The collateral is held by a third party financial institution in the counterparty’s custodial account. The counterparty has the right to sell or repledge the investment securities. For government entity repurchase agreements, the collateral is held by the Company in a segregated custodial account under a tri-party agreement. The Company is required by the counterparty to maintain adequate collateral levels. In the event the collateral fair value falls below stipulated levels, the Company will pledge additional securities. The Company closely monitors collateral levels to ensure adequate levels are maintained, while mitigating the potential risk of over-collateralization in the event of counterparty default.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the remaining contractual maturities of the Company’s repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, disaggregated by the class of collateral pledged.



	Remaining Contractual Maturity of Repurchase Agreements
(dollars in thousands)	Up to 90 days		91-365 days		1-3 Years		After 3 Years		Total
March 31, 2019
Class of Collateral Pledged:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	—	$	—	$	116,258	$	195,638	$	311,896
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		2,790		—		—		2,790
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	—		1,509		67,139		29,362		98,010
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		—		91,603		—		91,603
Total	$	—	$	4,299	$	275,000	$	225,000	$	504,299

December 31, 2018
Class of Collateral Pledged:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	—	$	—	$	198,442	$	117,021	$	315,463
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	1,906		1,590		—		—		3,496
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	800		—		26,558		70,341		97,699
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		—		—		87,638		87,638
Total	$	2,706	$	1,590	$	225,000	$	275,000	$	504,296

Table of Contents

The following table presents the assets and liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement, or repurchase agreements, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The swap agreements the Company has with our commercial banking customers are not subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement, and therefore, are excluded from this table. As previously mentioned, centrally cleared swap agreements between the Company and institutional counterparties are also excluded from this table.



	(i)		(ii)		(iii) = (i)-(ii)		(iv)				(v) = (iii)-(iv)
	Gross Amounts Recognized in the Statements of Condition		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statements of Condition		Net Amounts Presented in the Statements of Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Condition
(dollars in thousands)							Netting Adjustments per Master Netting Arrangements		Fair Value of Collateral Pledged/Received ¹		Net Amount
March 31, 2019
Assets:
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
Institutional Counterparties	$	4,339	$	—	$	4,339	$	2,672	$	—	$	1,667

Liabilities:
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
Institutional Counterparties	2,672		—		2,672		2,672		—		—

Repurchase Agreements:
Private Institutions	500,000		—		500,000		—		500,000		—
Government Entities	4,299		—		4,299		—		4,299		—
	$	504,299	$	—	$	504,299	$	—	$	504,299	$	—

December 31, 2018
Assets:
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
Institutional Counterparties	$	7,572	$	—	$	7,572	$	1,490	$	—	$	6,082

Liabilities:
Interest Rate Swap Agreements:
Institutional Counterparties	1,490		—		1,490		1,490		—		—

Repurchase Agreements:
Private Institutions	500,000		—		500,000		—		500,000		—
Government Entities	4,296		—		4,296		—		4,296		—
	$	504,296	$	—	$	504,296	$	—	$	504,296	$	—

¹The application of collateral cannot reduce the net amount below zero. Therefore, excess collateral is not reflected in this table. For swap agreements with institutional counterparties, the fair value of investment securities pledged to the institutional counterparties was $2.5 million and less than $0.1 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. For repurchase agreements with private institutions, the fair value of investment securities pledged was $533.8 million and $526.7 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. For repurchase agreements with government entities, the fair value of investment securities pledged was $5.3 million and $6.8 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

Note 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:



(dollars in thousands)	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities:
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period	$	9,016		$	2,388		$	6,628
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) that (Increase) Decrease Net Income:
Amortization of Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses on Held-to-Maturity Securities ¹	396			105			291
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities	9,412			2,493			6,919
Defined Benefit Plans:
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	406			107			299
Amortization of Prior Service Credit	(72		)	(19		)	(53		)
Defined Benefit Plans, Net	334			88			246
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	9,746		$	2,581		$	7,165

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities:
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Arising During the Period	$	(13,057	)	$	(3,452	)	$	(9,605	)
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) that (Increase) Decrease Net Income:
Amortization of Unrealized Holding (Gains) Losses on Held-to-Maturity Securities ¹	659			175			484
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities	(12,398		)	(3,277		)	(9,121		)
Defined Benefit Plans:
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	436			116			320
Amortization of Prior Service Credit	(142		)	(38		)	(104		)
Defined Benefit Plans, Net	294			78			216
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$	(12,104	)	$	(3,199	)	$	(8,905	)


¹	The amount relates to the amortization/accretion of unrealized net gains and losses related to the Company’s reclassification of available-for-sale investment securities to the held-to-maturity category. The unrealized net gains/losses will be amortized/accreted over the remaining life of the investment securities as an adjustment of yield.

The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:



(dollars in thousands)	Investment Securities-Available-for-Sale			Investment Securities-Held-to-Maturity			Defined Benefit Plans			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	(10,447	)	$	(4,586	)	$	(36,010	)	$	(51,043	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Reclassifications	6,628			—			—			6,628
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	—			291			246			537
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	6,628			291			246			7,165
Balance at End of Period	$	(3,819	)	$	(4,295	)	$	(35,764	)	$	(43,878	)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	(1,915	)	$	(5,085	)	$	(27,715	)	$	(34,715	)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Reclassifications	(9,605		)	—			—			(9,605		)
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	—			484			216			700
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	(9,605		)	484			216			(8,905		)
Reclassification of the Income Tax Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from AOCI	(412		)	(1,096		)	(5,969		)	(7,477		)
Balance at End of Period	$	(11,932	)	$	(5,697	)	$	(33,468	)	$	(51,097	)

Table of Contents

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:



Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)¹						Affected Line Item in the Statement Where Net Income Is Presented
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Amortization of Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity	$	(396	)	$	(659	)	Interest Income
	105			175			Provision for Income Tax
	(291		)	(484		)	Net of Tax

Amortization of Defined Benefit Plan Items
Prior Service Credit ²	72			142
Net Actuarial Losses ²	(406		)	(436		)
	(334		)	(294		)	Total Before Tax
	88			78			Provision for Income Tax
	(246		)	(216		)	Net of Tax

Total Reclassifications for the Period	$	(537	)	$	(700	)	Net of Tax


¹	Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to net income.


²	These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and are included in Other Noninterest Expense on the consolidated statements of income (see Note 11 Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan for additional details).

Note 9. Earnings Per Share

There were no adjustments to net income, the numerator, for purposes of computing earnings per share. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for computing diluted earnings per share and antidilutive stock options and restricted stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019	2018
Denominator for Basic Earnings Per Share	40,938,318	42,038,573
Dilutive Effect of Equity Based Awards	275,135	319,852
Denominator for Diluted Earnings Per Share	41,213,453	42,358,425

Antidilutive Stock Options and Restricted Stock Outstanding	102,394	137

Note 10. Business Segments

The Company’s business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services and Private Banking, and Treasury and Other. The Company’s internal management accounting process measures the performance of these business segments. This process, which is not necessarily comparable with the process used by any other financial institution, uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the provision for credit losses, and capital. This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to GAAP. Previously reported results have been reclassified to conform to the current reporting structure.

Table of Contents

The net interest income of the business segments reflects the results of a funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics and reflects the allocation of net interest income related to the Company’s overall asset and liability management activities on a proportionate basis. The basis for the allocation of net interest income is a function of the Company’s assumptions that are subject to change based on changes in current interest rates and market conditions. Funds transfer pricing also serves to transfer interest rate risk to Treasury. However, the other business segments have some latitude to retain certain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing decisions within guidelines.

The provision for credit losses reflects the actual net charge-offs of the business segments. The amount of the consolidated provision for loan and lease losses is based on the methodology that we use to estimate the Company’s consolidated Allowance. The residual provision for credit losses to arrive at the consolidated provision for credit losses is included in Treasury and Other.

Noninterest income and expense includes allocations from support units to business units. These allocations are based on actual usage where practicably calculated or by management’s estimate of such usage.

The provision for income taxes is allocated to business segments using a 26% effective income tax rate. However, the provision for income taxes for the Company’s Leasing business unit (included in the Commercial Banking segment) and Auto Leasing portfolio and Pacific Century Life Insurance business unit (both included in the Retail Banking segment) are assigned their actual effective income tax rates due to the unique relationship that income taxes have with their products. The residual income tax expense or benefit to arrive at the consolidated effective income tax rate is included in Treasury and Other.

Retail Banking

Retail Banking offers a broad range of financial products and services to consumers and small businesses. Loan and lease products include residential mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, automobile loans and leases, personal lines of credit, installment loans, and small business loans and leases. Deposit products include checking, savings, and time deposit accounts. Retail Banking also offers co-branded credit cards and some types of consumer insurance products. Products and services from Retail Banking are delivered to customers through 69 branch locations and 385 ATMs throughout Hawaii and the Pacific Islands, e-Bankoh (on-line banking service), a 24-hour customer service center, and a mobile banking service.

Commercial Banking

Commercial Banking offers products including corporate banking, commercial real estate loans, commercial lease financing, auto dealer financing, and deposit products. Commercial lending and deposit products are offered to middle-market and large companies in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. In addition, Commercial Banking offers deposit products to government entities in Hawaii. Commercial real estate mortgages focus on customers that include investors, developers, and builders predominantly domiciled in Hawaii. Commercial Banking also includes international banking and provides merchant services to its customers.

Investment Services and Private Banking

Investment Services and Private Banking includes private banking and international client banking services, trust services, investment management, and institutional investment advisory services. A significant portion of this segment’s income is derived from fees, which are generally based on the market values of assets under management. The private banking and personal trust groups assist individuals and families in building and preserving their wealth by providing investment, credit, and trust services to high-net-worth individuals. The investment management group manages portfolios utilizing a variety of investment products. Institutional client services offer investment advice to corporations, government entities, and foundations. This segment also provides a full service brokerage offering equities, mutual funds, life insurance, and annuity products.

Table of Contents

Treasury and Other

Treasury consists of corporate asset and liability management activities, including interest rate risk management and a foreign currency exchange business. This segment’s assets and liabilities (and related interest income and expense) consist of interest-bearing deposits, investment securities, federal funds sold and purchased, and short and long-term borrowings. The primary sources of noninterest income are from bank-owned life insurance, net gains from the sale of investment securities, and foreign exchange income related to customer-driven currency requests from merchants and island visitors. The net residual effect of the transfer pricing of assets and liabilities is included in Treasury, along with the elimination of intercompany transactions.

Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) provide a wide-range of support to the Company’s other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.

Selected business segment financial information as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	Retail Banking			Commercial Banking			Investment Services and Private Banking			Treasury and Other			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Net Interest Income	$	66,154		$	47,290		$	10,198		$	1,195		$	124,837
Provision for Credit Losses	2,241			1,446			(17		)	(670		)	3,000
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	63,913			45,844			10,215			1,865			121,837
Noninterest Income	21,233			7,061			13,245			2,140			43,679
Noninterest Expense	(52,524		)	(20,955		)	(16,903		)	(2,675		)	(93,057		)
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	32,622			31,950			6,557			1,330			72,459
Provision for Income Taxes	(8,105		)	(6,002		)	(1,729		)	2,176			(13,660		)
Net Income	$	24,517		$	25,948		$	4,828		$	3,506		$	58,799
Total Assets as of March 31, 2019	$	6,454,127		$	4,004,176		$	341,979		$	6,646,131		$	17,446,413

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Interest Income	$	64,397		$	42,898		$	9,887		$	1,774		$	118,956
Provision for Credit Losses	3,743			(151		)	(60		)	593			4,125
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	60,654			43,049			9,947			1,181			114,831
Noninterest Income	19,253			5,642			13,670			5,470			44,035
Noninterest Expense	(54,599		)	(20,332		)	(16,207		)	(3,246		)	(94,384		)
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	25,308			28,359			7,410			3,405			64,482
Provision for Income Taxes	(6,291		)	(6,824		)	(1,954		)	4,627			(10,442		)
Net Income	$	19,017		$	21,535		$	5,456		$	8,032		$	54,040
Total Assets as of March 31, 2018	$	6,041,271		$	3,771,678		$	332,454		$	6,990,627		$	17,136,030

Table of Contents

Note 11. Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan

Components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and the postretirement benefit plan are presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Three Months Ended March 31,
Service Cost	$	—		$	—		$	118		$	115
Interest Cost	1,094			1,041			258			235
Expected Return on Plan Assets	(1,249		)	(1,282		)	—			—
Amortization of:
Prior Service Credit	—			—			(72		)	(142		)
Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	484			498			(78		)	(62		)
Net Periodic Benefit Cost	$	329		$	257		$	226		$	146

The service cost component of net periodic benefit cost are included in salaries and benefits and all other components of net periodic benefit cost are included in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement benefit plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company contributed $0.1 million to the pension plans and $0.3 million to the postretirement benefit plan. The Company expects to contribute a total of $0.5 million to the pension plans and $0.9 million to the postretirement benefit plan for the year ending December 31, 2019.

Note 12. Derivative Financial Instruments

The notional amount and fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:



	March 31, 2019						December 31, 2018
(dollars in thousands)	Notional Amount			Fair Value			Notional Amount			Fair Value
Interest Rate Lock Commitments		$	45,876	$	1,099			$	33,133	$	871
Forward Commitments		51,318		(379		)		34,102		(352		)
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Receive Fixed/Pay Variable Swaps		550,255		6,409				505,034		(2,537		)
Pay Fixed/Receive Variable Swaps		550,255		1,667				505,034		6,082
Foreign Exchange Contracts		59,893		(173		)		55,663		793
Conversion Rate Swap Agreement		95,587		—				80,746		—

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments, their fair values, and their location in the consolidated statements of condition as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



Derivative Financial Instruments	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments ¹	Asset		Liability		Asset		Liability
(dollars in thousands)	Derivatives		Derivatives		Derivatives		Derivatives
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	$	1,099	$	—	$	877	$	6
Forward Commitments	16		395		4		356
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	15,086		7,010		12,915		9,370
Foreign Exchange Contracts	39		212		808		15
Total	$	16,240	$	7,617	$	14,604	$	9,747


¹	Asset derivatives are included in other assets and liability derivatives are included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:



	Location of
Derivative Financial Instruments	Net Gains (Losses)	Three Months Ended
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Recognized in the	March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	Statements of Income	2019			2018
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	Mortgage Banking	$	1,725		$	530
Forward Commitments	Mortgage Banking	(592		)	684
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	Other Noninterest Income	1,136			118
Foreign Exchange Contracts	Other Noninterest Income	914			964
Total		$	3,183		$	2,296

Management has received authorization from the Bank’s Board of Directors to use derivative financial instruments as an end-user in connection with the Bank’s risk management activities and to accommodate the needs of the Bank’s customers. As with any financial instrument, derivative financial instruments have inherent risks. Market risk is defined as the risk of adverse financial impact due to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices. Market risks associated with derivative financial instruments are balanced with the expected returns to enhance earnings performance and shareholder value, while limiting the volatility of each. The Company uses various processes to monitor its overall market risk exposure, including sensitivity analysis, value-at-risk calculations, and other methodologies.

Derivative financial instruments are also subject to credit and counterparty risk, which is defined as the risk of financial loss if a borrower or counterparty is either unable or unwilling to repay borrowings or settle transactions in accordance with the underlying contractual terms. Credit and counterparty risks associated with derivative financial instruments are similar to those relating to traditional financial instruments. The Company manages derivative credit and counterparty risk by evaluating the creditworthiness of each borrower or counterparty, adhering to the same credit approval process used for commercial lending activities.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not designate any derivative financial instruments as formal hedging relationships. The Company’s free-standing derivative financial instruments are required to be carried at their fair value on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition. These financial instruments have been limited to interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”), forward commitments, Swap Agreements, foreign exchange contracts, and conversion rate swap agreements.

The Company enters into IRLCs for residential mortgage loans which commit us to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specific interest rate and within a specified period of time. IRLCs that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale are considered derivative financial instruments under applicable accounting guidance. Outstanding IRLCs expose the Company to the risk that the price of the mortgage loans underlying the commitments may decline due to increases in mortgage interest rates from inception of the rate lock to the funding of the loan. To mitigate this risk, the Company utilizes forward commitments as economic hedges against the potential decreases in the values of the loans held for sale. IRLCs and forward commitments are free-standing derivatives which are carried at fair value with changes recorded in the mortgage banking component of noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

The Company enters into Swap Agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers. The Company mitigates the interest rate risk of entering into these agreements by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements with highly rated third party financial institutions. The interest rate swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition. Fair value changes are recorded in other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. Collateral, usually in the form of cash or marketable securities, is posted by the counterparty with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds. See Note 7 Balance Sheet Offsetting for more information.

Table of Contents

The Company’s interest rate swap agreements with financial institution counterparties may contain credit-risk-related contingent features tied to a specified credit rating of the Company. Under these provisions, should the Company’s specified rating fall below a particular level (e.g., investment grade), or if the Company no longer obtains the specified rating, the counterparty may require the Company to pledge collateral on an immediate and ongoing basis (subject to the requirement that such swaps are in a net liability position beyond the level specified in the contract), or require immediate settlement of the swap agreement. Other credit-risk-related contingent features may also allow the counterparty to require immediate settlement of the swap agreement if the Company fails to maintain a specified minimum level of capitalization.

With regard to derivative contracts not centrally cleared through a clearinghouse, regulations require collateral to be posted by the party with a net liability position (i.e., the threshold for posting collateral was reduced to zero, subject to certain minimum transfer amounts). The requirements generally applied to new derivative contracts entered into by the Company after March 1, 2017, although certain counterparties may elect to apply lower thresholds to existing contracts.

Parties to a centrally cleared over-the-counter derivative exchange daily payments that reflect the daily change in value of the derivative. These payments are commonly referred to as variation margin. Historically, variation margin payments have typically been treated as collateral against the derivative position. Effective 2017, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and LCH.Clearnet Limited (collectively, the “clearinghouses”) amended their rulebooks to legally characterize variation margin payments for over-the-counter derivatives they clear as settlements of the derivatives’ mark-to-market exposure rather than collateral against the exposures. This rule change effectively causes any derivative cleared through one of the clearinghouses to have a fair value that approximates zero on a daily basis. The majority of the Company’s swap agreements executed with third party financial institutions are now required to be cleared through one of the clearinghouses. The uncleared swap agreements executed with third party financial institutions will remain subject to the collateral requirements and credit-risk-related contingent features described in the previous paragraphs, and therefore, are not subject to the variation margin rule change. Likewise, the swap agreements executed with the Company’s commercial banking customers will remain uncleared and will also not be subject to the variation margin rule change.

The Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts to offset risks related to transactions executed on behalf of customers. The foreign exchange contracts are free-standing derivatives which are carried at fair value with changes included in other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

As each sale of Visa Class B restricted shares was completed, the Company entered into a conversion rate swap agreement with the buyer that requires payment to the buyer in the event Visa further reduces the conversion ratio of Class B into Class A unrestricted common shares. In the event of Visa increasing the conversion ratio, the buyer would be required to make payment to the Company. As of March 31, 2019, the conversion rate swap agreement was valued at zero (i.e., no contingent liability recorded) as further reductions to the conversion ratio were deemed neither probable nor reasonably estimable by management. See Note 3 Investment Securities for more information.

Note 13. Commitments, Contingencies, and Guarantees

The Company’s credit commitments as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Unfunded Commitments to Extend Credit	$	2,702,062	$	2,646,085
Standby Letters of Credit	60,165		62,344
Commercial Letters of Credit	10,031		9,411
Total Credit Commitments	$	2,772,258	$	2,717,840

Unfunded Commitments to Extend Credit

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of the terms or conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since commitments may expire without being drawn, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Table of Contents

Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally become payable upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and a third party. The contractual amount of these letters of credit represents the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company. The Company has recourse against the customer for any amount it is required to pay to a third party under a standby letter of credit, and generally holds cash or deposits as collateral on those standby letters of credit for which collateral is deemed necessary.

Contingencies

On September 9, 2016, a purported class action lawsuit was filed by a Bank customer primarily alleging Bank of Hawaii’s practice of determining whether consumer deposit accounts were overdrawn based on “available balance” (which deducts debit card transactions that have taken place but which have not yet been posted) was not properly applied or disclosed to customers.

This lawsuit is similar to lawsuits filed against other financial institutions pertaining to available balance overdraft fee disclosures. Management disputes any wrongdoing and the case is being vigorously defended. Because of the many questions of fact and law that may arise in the future, the outcome of this legal proceeding is uncertain.

A previously disclosed lawsuit from 2017 alleged that Bank of Hawaii’s practice of assessing a continuous negative balance overdraft fee on accounts remaining in a negative balance for extended periods of time beyond the date of the initial overdraft constituted a usurious interest charge and a breach of contract. That litigation was settled before the filing of a motion to certify the purported class of claimants.

In addition to the litigation noted above, the Company is subject to various other pending and threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business or operations. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings using the most recent information available. On a case-by-case basis, reserves are established for those legal claims for which it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on information currently available, management believes that the eventual outcome of these claims against the Company will not be materially in excess of such amounts reserved by the Company. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters may result in a loss that materially exceeds the reserves established by the Company.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Representation and Warranty Provisions

The Company sells residential mortgage loans in the secondary market primarily to the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”). The Company also pools Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) insured and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) guaranteed residential mortgage loans for sale to the Government National Mortgage Corporation (“Ginnie Mae”). These pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed residential mortgage loans are securitized by Ginnie Mae. The agreements under which the Company sells residential mortgage loans to Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae and the insurance or guaranty agreements with FHA and VA contain provisions that include various representations and warranties regarding the origination and characteristics of the residential mortgage loans. Although the specific representations and warranties vary among investors, insurance or guarantee agreements, they typically cover ownership of the loan, validity of the lien securing the loan, the absence of delinquent taxes or liens against the property securing the loan, compliance with loan criteria set forth in the applicable agreement, compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, and other matters. As of March 31, 2019, the unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans sold by the Company was $2.6 billion. The agreements under which the Company sells residential mortgage loans require delivery of various documents to the investor or its document custodian. Although these loans are primarily sold on a non-recourse basis, the Company may be obligated to repurchase residential mortgage loans or reimburse investors for losses incurred if a loan review reveals that underwriting and documentation standards were potentially not met. Some agreements may require the Company to repurchase delinquent loans. Upon receipt of a repurchase request, the Company works with investors or insurers to arrive at a mutually agreeable resolution. Repurchase demands are typically reviewed on an individual loan-by-loan basis to validate the claims made by the investor or insurer and to determine if a contractually required repurchase event has occurred. The Company manages the risk associated with potential repurchases or other forms of settlement through its underwriting and quality assurance practices and by servicing mortgage loans to meet investor and secondary market standards. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, there were no residential mortgage loans repurchased as a result of the representation and warranty provisions contained in these contracts. As of March 31, 2019, there were no pending repurchase requests related to representation and warranty provisions.

Risks Relating to Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing Activities

In addition to servicing loans in the Company’s portfolio, substantially all of the loans the Company sells to investors are sold with servicing rights retained. The Company also services loans originated by other mortgage loan originators. As servicer, the Company’s primary duties are to: (1) collect payments due from borrowers; (2) advance certain delinquent payments of principal and interest; (3) maintain and administer any hazard, title, or primary mortgage insurance policies relating to the mortgage loans; (4) maintain any required escrow accounts for payment of taxes and insurance and administer escrow payments; and (5) foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the documents governing a securitization, consider alternatives to foreclosure, such as loan modifications or short sales. Each agreement under which the Company acts as servicer generally specifies a standard of responsibility for actions taken by the Company in such capacity and provides protection against expenses and liabilities incurred by the Company when acting in compliance with the respective servicing agreements. However, if the Company commits a material breach of obligations as servicer, the Company may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period following notice. The standards governing servicing and the possible remedies for violations of such standards vary by investor. These standards and remedies are determined by servicing guides issued by the investors as well as the contract provisions established between the investors and the Company. Remedies could include repurchase of an affected loan. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, there were no loans repurchased related to loan servicing activities. As of March 31, 2019, there were no pending repurchase requests related to loan servicing activities.

Although to date repurchase requests related to representation and warranty provisions and servicing activities have been limited, it is possible that requests to repurchase mortgage loans may increase in frequency as investors more aggressively pursue all means of recovering losses on their purchased loans. However, as of March 31, 2019, management believes that this exposure is not material due to the historical level of repurchase requests and loss trends and thus has not established a liability for losses related to mortgage loan repurchases. As of March 31, 2019, 99% of the Company’s residential mortgage loans serviced for investors were current. The Company maintains ongoing communications with investors and continues to evaluate this exposure by monitoring the level and number of repurchase requests as well as the delinquency rates in the loans sold to investors.

Table of Contents

Note 14. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Hierarchy

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:



Level 1:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and is used to measure fair value whenever available. A contractually binding sales price also provides reliable evidence of fair value.

Level 2:	Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that utilize model-based techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement; inputs to the valuation methodology that utilize model-based techniques for which significant assumptions are not observable in the market; or inputs to the valuation methodology that require significant management judgment or estimation, some of which may be internally developed.

In some instances, an instrument may fall into multiple levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such instances, the instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest of the three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of an input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the instrument.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Fair values of investment securities available-for-sale were primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service. This service provides pricing information by utilizing evaluated pricing models supported with market data information. Standard inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data from market research publications. Level 1 investment securities are comprised of debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, as quoted prices were available, unadjusted, for identical securities in active markets. Level 2 investment securities were primarily comprised of debt securities issued by the Small Business Administration, states and municipalities, corporations, as well as mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises. Fair values were estimated primarily by obtaining quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or through the use of pricing models. In cases where there may be limited or less transparent information provided by the Company’s third-party pricing service, fair value may be estimated by the use of secondary pricing services or through the use of non-binding third-party broker quotes.

On a quarterly basis, management reviews the pricing information received from the Company’s third-party pricing service. This review process includes a comparison to a second source. The Company’s third-party pricing service has also established

processes for us to submit inquiries regarding quoted prices. Periodically, based on these reviews, the Company will challenge

the quoted prices provided by the Company’s third-party pricing service. The Company’s third-party pricing service will review the inputs to the evaluation in light of the new market data presented by us. The Company’s third-party pricing service may then affirm the original quoted price or may update the evaluation on a going-forward basis. Generally, we do not adjust the price from the third-party service provider. On a quarterly basis, management also reviews a sample of securities priced by the Company’s third-party pricing service to review the significant assumptions and valuation methodologies used by the service. The information provided is comprised of market reference data, which may include reported trades; bids, offers, or broker-dealer dealer quotes; benchmark yields and spreads; as well as other reference data as appropriate. Based on this review, management determines whether the current placement of the security in the fair value hierarchy is appropriate or whether transfers may be warranted.

Table of Contents

Loans Held for Sale

The fair value of the Company’s residential mortgage loans held for sale was determined based on quoted prices for similar loans in active markets, and therefore, is classified as a Level 2 measurement.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable market data. As a result, the Company estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The Company stratifies its mortgage servicing portfolio on the basis of loan type. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are those that the Company believes market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. Significant assumptions in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights include estimated loan repayment rates, the discount rate, servicing costs, and the timing of cash flows, among other factors. Mortgage servicing rights are classified as Level 3 measurements due to the use of significant unobservable inputs, as well as significant management judgment and estimation.

Other Assets

Other assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are primarily comprised of investments related to deferred compensation arrangements. Quoted prices for these investments, primarily in mutual funds, are available in active markets. Thus, the Company’s investments related to deferred compensation arrangements are classified as Level 1 measurements in the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are comprised of IRLCs, forward commitments, interest rate swap agreements, foreign exchange contracts, and Visa Class B to Class A shares conversion rate swap agreements. The fair values of IRLCs are calculated based on the value of the underlying loan held for sale, which in turn is based on quoted prices for similar loans in the secondary market. However, this value is adjusted by a factor which considers the likelihood that the loan in a locked position will ultimately close. This factor, the closing ratio, is derived from the Bank’s internal data and is adjusted using significant management judgment. As such, IRLCs are classified as Level 3 measurements. Forward commitments are classified as Level 2 measurements as they are primarily based on quoted prices from the secondary market based on the settlement date of the contracts, interpolated or extrapolated, if necessary, to estimate a fair value as of the end of the reporting period. The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are calculated using a discounted cash flow approach and utilize Level 2 observable inputs such as a market yield curve, effective date, maturity date, notional amount, and stated interest rate. In addition, the Company includes in its fair value calculation a credit factor adjustment which is based primarily on management judgment. Thus, interest rate swap agreements are classified as a Level 3 measurement. The fair values of foreign exchange contracts are calculated using the Bank’s multi-currency accounting system which utilizes contract specific information such as currency, maturity date, contractual amount, and strike price, along with market data information such as the spot rates of specific currency and yield curves. Foreign exchange contracts are classified as Level 2 measurements because while they are valued using the Bank’s multi-currency accounting system, significant management judgment or estimation is not required. The fair value of the Visa Class B restricted shares to Class A unrestricted common shares conversion rate swap agreements represent the amount owed by the Company to the buyer of the Visa Class B shares as a result of a reduction of the conversion ratio subsequent to the sales date. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the conversion rate swap agreements were valued at zero as reductions to the conversion ratio were neither probable nor reasonably estimable by management. See Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments for more information.

The Company is exposed to credit risk if borrowers or counterparties fail to perform. The Company seeks to minimize credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures, and collateral requirements. The Company generally enters into transactions with borrowers and counterparties that carry high quality credit ratings. Credit risk associated with borrowers or counterparties as well as the Company’s non-performance risk is factored into the determination of the fair value of derivative financial instruments.

Table of Contents

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:



	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Total
March 31, 2019
Assets:
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	993	$	362,729	$	—	$	363,722
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		176,729		—		176,729
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		190		—		190
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	—		223,983		—		223,983
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	—		398,964		—		398,964
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		555,243		—		555,243
Commercial - Government Agencies	—		140,425		—		140,425
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		1,094,632		—		1,094,632
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	993		1,858,263		—		1,859,256
Loans Held for Sale	—		17,909		—		17,909
Mortgage Servicing Rights	—		—		1,268		1,268
Other Assets	35,387		—		—		35,387
Derivatives ¹	—		55		16,185		16,240
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of March 31, 2019	$	36,380	$	1,876,227	$	17,453	$	1,930,060

Liabilities:
Derivatives ¹	$	—	$	607	$	7,010	$	7,617
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of March 31, 2019	$	—	$	607	$	7,010	$	7,617

December 31, 2018
Assets:
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	$	972	$	391,429	$	—	$	392,401
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	—		563,996		—		563,996
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		56		—		56
Debt Securities Issued by Corporations	—		223,140		—		223,140
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
Residential - Government Agencies	—		190,442		—		190,442
Residential - U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	—		578,527		—		578,527
Commercial - Government Agencies	—		59,380		—		59,380
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	—		828,349		—		828,349
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	972		2,006,970		—		2,007,942
Loans Held for Sale	—		10,987		—		10,987
Mortgage Servicing Rights	—		—		1,290		1,290
Other Assets	31,871		—		—		31,871
Derivatives ¹	—		812		13,792		14,604
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2018	$	32,843	$	2,018,769	$	15,082	$	2,066,694

Liabilities:
Derivatives ¹	$	—	$	371	$	9,376	$	9,747
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2018	$	—	$	371	$	9,376	$	9,747


¹	The fair value of each class of derivatives is shown in Note 12 Derivative Financial Instruments.

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	Mortgage Servicing Rights ¹			Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities ²
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Balance as of January 1, 2019	$	1,290		$	4,416
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):
Included in Net Income	(22		)	1,715
Transfers to Loans Held for Sale	—			(1,498		)
Variation Margin Payments	—			4,542
Balance as of March 31, 2019	$	1,268		$	9,175
Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets Still Held as of March 31, 2019	$	—		$	9,175

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Balance as of January 1, 2018	$	1,454		$	894
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):
Included in Net Income	(50		)	537
Transfers to Loans Held for Sale	—			(382		)
Variation Margin Payments	—			(502		)
Balance as of March 31, 2018	$	1,404		$	547
Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets Still Held as of March 31, 2018	$	—		$	547


¹	Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to mortgage servicing rights are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.


²	Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate lock commitments are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate swap agreements are reported as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:



		Significant Unobservable Inputs (weighted-average)					Fair Value
(dollars in thousands)	Valuation Technique	Description	Mar. 31, 2019		Dec. 31, 2018		Mar. 31, 2019		Dec. 31, 2018
Mortgage Servicing Rights	Discounted Cash Flow	Constant Prepayment Rate ¹	8.62	%	7.01	%	$	28,082	$	30,508
		Discount Rate ²	8.57	%	9.59	%

Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities:
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	Pricing Model	Closing Ratio	87.60	%	89.00	%	$	1,099	$	871
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	Discounted Cash Flow	Credit Factor	0.13	%	0.06	%	$	8,076	$	3,545


¹	Represents annualized loan repayment rate assumption.


²	Derived from multiple interest rate scenarios that incorporate a spread to a market yield curve and market volatilities.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights are the weighted-average constant prepayment rate and weighted-average discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Although the constant prepayment rate and the discount rate are not directly interrelated, they generally move in opposite directions of each other.

Table of Contents

The Company estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The Company’s Treasury Division enters observable and unobservable inputs into the model to arrive at an estimated fair value. To assess the reasonableness of the fair value measurement, the Treasury Division performs a back-test by comparing the model’s results to historical prepayment data. The Treasury Division also compares the fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights to a value calculated by an independent third party. Discussions are held with members from the Treasury, Mortgage Banking, and Controllers Divisions, along with the independent third party to discuss and reconcile the fair value estimates and key assumptions used by the respective parties in arriving at those estimates. A subcommittee of the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee is responsible for providing oversight over the valuation methodology and key assumptions.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s IRLCs is the closing ratio, which represents the percentage of loans currently in a lock position which management estimates will ultimately close. Generally, the fair value of an IRLC is positive (negative) if the prevailing interest rate is lower (higher) than the IRLC rate. Therefore, an increase in the closing ratio (i.e., higher percentage of loans are estimated to close) will increase the gain or loss. The closing ratio is largely dependent on the loan processing stage that a loan is currently in and the change in prevailing interest rates from the time of the rate lock. The closing ratio is computed by the Company’s secondary marketing system using historical data and the ratio is periodically reviewed by the Company for reasonableness.

The unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements is the credit factor. This factor represents the risk that a counterparty is either unable or unwilling to settle a transaction in accordance with the underlying contractual terms. A significant increase (decrease) in the credit factor could result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The credit factor is determined by the Treasury Division based on the risk rating assigned to each counterparty in which the Company holds a net asset position. The Company’s Credit Policy Committee periodically reviews and approves the Expected Default Frequency of the Economic Capital Model for Credit Risk. The Expected Default Frequency is used as the credit factor for interest rate swap agreements.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required periodically to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or impairment write-downs of individual assets. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no material adjustments to fair value for the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.

Fair Value Option

The Company elects the fair value option for all residential mortgage loans held for sale. This election allows for a more effective offset of the changes in fair values of the loans held for sale and the derivative financial instruments used to financially hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting requirements. As noted above, the fair value of the Company’s residential mortgage loans held for sale was determined based on quoted prices for similar loans in active markets.

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the Company’s residential mortgage loans held for sale as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



(dollars in thousands)	Aggregate Fair Value		Aggregate Unpaid Principal			Aggregate Fair Value Less Aggregate Unpaid Principal
March 31, 2019
Loans Held for Sale	$	17,909		$	17,441		$	468

December 31, 2018
Loans Held for Sale	$	10,987		$	10,656		$	331

Changes in the estimated fair value of residential mortgage loans held for sale are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the net gains or losses from the change in fair value of the Company’s residential mortgage loans held for sale were not material.

Table of Contents

Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following presents the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. This table excludes financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value. For short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the relatively short time between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization. For non-marketable equity securities such as Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value as these securities can only be redeemed or sold at their par value and only to the respective issuing government supported institution or to another member institution. For financial liabilities such as noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, and savings deposits, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to these products having no stated maturity.



					Fair Value Measurements
	Carrying				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
March 31, 2019
Financial Instruments - Assets
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity	$	3,668,811	$	3,637,496	$	353,340	$	3,284,156	$	—
Loans ¹	10,203,730		10,280,694		—		—		10,280,694

Financial Instruments - Liabilities
Time Deposits	1,763,070		1,754,931		—		1,754,931		—
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	504,299		504,293		—		504,293		—
Other Debt ²	100,000		99,905		—		99,905		—

December 31, 2018
Financial Instruments - Assets
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity	$	3,482,092	$	3,413,994	$	352,216	$	3,061,778	$	—
Loans ¹	10,084,527		10,008,417		—		—		10,008,417

Financial Instruments - Liabilities
Time Deposits	1,745,522		1,734,447		—		1,734,447		—
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	504,296		504,288		—		504,288		—
Other Debt ²	125,000		124,559		—		124,559		—


¹	Carrying amount is net of unearned income and the Allowance.


²	Excludes capitalized lease obligations.

Table of Contents

Note 15. Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenue. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, financial guarantees, derivatives, and certain credit card fees are also not within the scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as trust and asset management income, deposit related fees, interchange fees, merchant income, and annuity and insurance commissions. However, the recognition of these covered revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest revenue streams in-scope of Topic 606 are discussed below.

Trust and Asset Management

Trust and asset management income is primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon the month-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company does not earn performance-based incentives. Optional services such as real estate sales and tax return preparation services are also available to existing trust and asset management customers. The Company’s performance obligation for these transactional-based services is generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time (i.e., as incurred). Payment is received shortly after services are rendered.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

Service charges on deposit accounts consist of account analysis fees (i.e., net fees earned on analyzed business and public checking accounts), monthly service fees, check orders, and other deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other deposit account related fees are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.

Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges

Fees, exchange, and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit card income, ATM fees, merchant services income, and other service charges. Debit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s debit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Visa. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses a non-Company ATM or a non-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. Merchant services income mainly represents fees charged to merchants to process their debit and credit card transactions, in addition to account management fees. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks, and other services. The Company’s performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month.

Annuity and Insurance

Annuity and insurance income primarily consists of commissions received on annuity product sales. The Company acts as an intermediary between the Company’s customer and the insurance carrier. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied upon the issuance of the annuity policy. Shortly after the policy is issued, the carrier remits the commission payment to the Company, and the Company recognizes the revenue. The Company does not earn a significant amount of trailer fees on annuity sales. The majority of the trailer fees relates to variable annuity products and are calculated based on a percentage of market value at period end. Revenue is not recognized until the annuity’s market value can be determined.

Table of Contents

Other

Other noninterest income consists of other recurring revenue streams such as commissions from sales of mutual funds and other investments, investment advisor fees from the Company’s Managed Account Platform Services (MAPS) wealth management product, safety deposit box rental fees, and other miscellaneous revenue streams. Commissions from the sale of mutual funds and other investments are recognized on trade date, which is when the Company has satisfied its performance obligation. The Company also receives periodic service fees (i.e., trailers) from mutual fund companies typically based on a percentage of net asset value. Trailer revenue is recorded over time, usually monthly or quarterly, as net asset value is determined. Investment advisor fees from the MAPS wealth management product is earned over time and based on an annual percentage rate of the net asset value. The investment advisor fees are charged to the customer’s account in advance on the first month of the quarter, and the revenue is recognized over the following three-month period. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Company determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation.

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



		Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)		2019		2018
Noninterest Income
	In-scope of Topic 606:
	Trust and Asset Management	$	10,761	$	11,181
	Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	3,349		3,574
	Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges	11,552		11,593
	Annuity and Insurance	2,544		1,144
	Other	2,471		2,277
	Noninterest Income (in-scope of Topic 606)	30,677		29,769
	Noninterest Income (out-of-scope of Topic 606)	13,002		14,266
Total Noninterest Income		$	43,679	$	44,035

Contract Balances

A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity, or standard month-end revenue accruals such as asset management fees based on month-end market values. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any significant contract balances.

Contract Acquisition Costs

In connection with the adoption of Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained (for example, sales commission). The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition cost.

Table of Contents

Note 16. Leases

A lease is defined as a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases” (Topic 842) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842. For the Company, Topic 842 primarily affected the accounting treatment for operating lease agreements in which the Company is the lessee.

Lessee Accounting

Substantially all of the leases in which the Company is the lessee are comprised of real estate property for branches, ATM locations, and office space with terms extending through 2052. Portions of certain properties are subleased for terms extending through 2033. Substantially all of our leases are classified as operating leases, and therefore, were previously not recognized on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition. With the adoption of Topic 842, operating lease agreements are required to be recognized on the consolidated statements of condition as a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a corresponding lease liability. The Company has one existing finance lease (previously referred to as a capital lease) for a portion of the Company’s headquarters’ building with a lease term through 2052. As this lease was previously required to be recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition, Topic 842 did not materially impact the accounting for this lease.

The following table represents the consolidated statements of condition classification of the Company’s ROU assets and lease liabilities. The Company elected not to include short-term leases (i.e., leases with initial terms of twelve months or less), or equipment leases (deemed immaterial) on the consolidated statements of condition.



(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019
Lease Right-of-Use Assets	Classification
Operating lease right-of-use assets	Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets	$	104,166
Finance lease right-of-use assets	Premises and Equipment, Net	2,430
Total Lease Right-of-Use Assets		$	106,596

Lease Liabilities
Operating lease liabilities	Operating Lease Liabilities	$	111,230
Finance lease liabilities	Other Debt	10,624
Total Lease Liabilities		$	121,854

The calculated amount of the ROU assets and lease liabilities in the table above are impacted by the length of the lease term and the discount rate used to present value the minimum lease payments. The Company’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company’s discretion. If at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain, the Company will include the extended term in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability. Regarding the discount rate, Topic 842 requires the use of the rate implicit in the lease whenever this rate is readily determinable. As this rate is rarely determinable, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception, on a collateralized basis, over a similar term. For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used. For the Company’s only finance lease, the Company utilized its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.



	March 31, 2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term
Operating leases	17.5 years
Finance leases	33.8 years
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases	3.68	%
Finance leases	7.04	%

Table of Contents

The following table represents lease costs and other lease information. As the Company elected, for all classes of underlying assets, not to separate lease and non-lease components and instead to account for them as a single lease component, the variable lease cost primarily represents variable payments such as common area maintenance and utilities. Variable lease cost also includes payments for ATM location leases in which payments are based on a percentage of ATM transactions (i.e., ATM surcharge fees), rather than a fixed amount.



(dollars in thousands)		Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Lease Costs
	Operating lease cost		$	3,185
	Variable lease cost		860
	Short-term lease cost		83
	Finance lease cost
	Interest on lease liabilities ¹		187
	Amortization of right-of-use assets		18
	Sublease income		(2,226		)
Net lease cost			$	2,107

Other Information
	Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
	Operating cash flows from operating leases		$	3,153
	Operating cash flows from finance leases		187
	Financing cash flows from finance leases		19

	Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities		—
	Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities		—


¹	Included in other debt interest expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. All other lease costs in this table are included in net occupancy expense.

Future minimum payments for finance leases and operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more as of March 31, 2019 were as follows:



(dollars in thousands)	Finance Leases			Operating Leases
Twelve Months Ended:
March 31, 2020	$	825		$	11,702
March 31, 2021	825			10,642
March 31, 2022	825			10,572
March 31, 2023	825			9,916
March 31, 2024	825			9,028
Thereafter	23,724			103,259
Total Future Minimum Lease Payments	27,849			155,119
Amounts Representing Interest	(17,225		)	(43,889		)
Present Value of Net Future Minimum Lease Payments	$	10,624		$	111,230

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may include statements concerning, among other things, the anticipated economic and business environment in our service area and elsewhere, credit quality and other financial and business matters in future periods, our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans and our objectives and future operations. We also may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, our senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. Our forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, any of which could prove to be inaccurate, and actual results may differ materially from those projected because of a variety of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: 1) general economic conditions either nationally, internationally, or locally may be different than expected, and particularly, any event that negatively impacts the tourism industry in Hawaii; 2) unanticipated changes in the securities markets, public debt markets, and other capital markets in the U.S. and internationally; 3) competitive pressures in the markets for financial services and products; 4) the impact of legislative and regulatory initiatives, particularly the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018; 5) changes in fiscal and monetary policies of the markets in which we operate; 6) the increased cost of maintaining or the Company’s ability to maintain adequate liquidity and capital, based on the requirements adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators; 7) actual or alleged conduct which could harm our reputation; 8) changes in accounting standards; 9) changes in tax laws or regulations, including Public Law 115-97, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the interpretation of such laws and regulations; 10) changes in our credit quality or risk profile that may increase or decrease the required level of our reserve for credit losses; 11) changes in market interest rates that may affect credit markets and our ability to maintain our net interest margin; 12) the impact of litigation and regulatory investigations of the Company, including costs, expenses, settlements, and judgments; 13) any failure in or breach of our operational systems, information systems or infrastructure, or those of our merchants, third party vendors and other service providers; 14) any interruption or breach of security of our information systems resulting in failures or disruptions in customer account management, general ledger processing, and loan or deposit systems; 15) changes to the amount and timing of proposed common stock repurchases; and 16) natural disasters, public unrest or adverse weather, public health, and other conditions impacting us and our customers’ operations or negatively impacting the tourism industry in Hawaii. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of our actual results. A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II of this report and Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, and subsequent periodic and current reports filed with the SEC. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect later events or circumstances, except as may be required by law.

Table of Contents

Overview

Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a Delaware corporation and a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Parent’s principal operating subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).

The Bank, directly and through its subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services and products to businesses, consumers, and governments in Hawaii, Guam, and other Pacific Islands. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to the Parent and its subsidiaries that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

The Company’s business strategy is to use our unique market knowledge, prudent management discipline and brand strength to deliver exceptional value to our stakeholders.

Hawaii Economy

General economic conditions in Hawaii remained healthy during the first quarter of 2019. The statewide seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate continues to remain low at 2.8% in March 2019, well below the 3.8% unemployment rate nationally.

The real estate market on Oahu remained strong during the first quarter of 2019 despite a moderate decrease in sales volume. Single-family home sales declined 5.7% and condominium sales declined 10.5% compared with sales during the first quarter of 2018. The median sales price of a single-family home increased 2.0%, while the median sales price of a condominium decreased 3.2% compared with the same quarter last year. As of March 31, 2019, months of inventory of single-family homes and condominiums on Oahu were 3.4 months and 3.6 months, respectively.

For the first two months of 2019, total visitor arrivals increased 1.8% although visitor spending declined 2.4% compared to the same period in 2018. Tourism during 2019 is expected to continue to perform well. Scheduled air seats to Hawaii are projected to expand as Southwest Airlines began flying to Hawaii in March and Hawaiian Airlines began offering the first non-stop flights between Hawaii and Boston in April.

Earnings Summary

Net income for the first quarter of 2019 was $58.8 million, an increase of $4.8 million or 9% compared to the same period in 2018. Diluted earnings per share was $1.43 for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of $0.15 or 12% compared to the same period in 2018.

The Company’s higher earnings for the first quarter of 2019 were primarily due to the following:

•

Net interest income for the first quarter of 2019 was $124.8 million for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of $5.9 million or 5% compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to a higher level of earning assets, including growth in both our commercial and consumer lending portfolios, and higher net interest margin. The higher level of earning assets was primarily funded by higher deposit balances. Net interest margin was 3.12% for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of 12 basis points compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to our loans, which generally have higher yields than our investment securities, comprising a larger percentage of our earning assets compared to 2018. In addition, yields increased for our commercial loans due to higher variable rates and for our investment portfolio due to higher variable rates, lower net amortization, as well as repositioning of lower yielding securities into higher yielding securities.


•	Other noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2019 was $13.8 million a decrease of $3.3 million or 19% compared to the same period in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.0 million legal reserve recorded in first quarter 2018 and a $0.9 million decrease in credit card expense due to the completed sale of our MyBankoh Rewards Credit Card portfolio on November 1, 2018.


•	Annuity and insurance income for the first quarter of 2019 was $2.6 million an increase of $1.4 million or 114% compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to a one-time commission received related to insurance products offered through a third-party administrator.

This increase was partially offset by the following:


•	The provision for income taxes for the first quarter of 2019 was $13.7 million, an increase of $3.2 million or 31% compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to higher pre-tax income. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2019 was 18.85%, compared to 16.19% for the same period in 2018.

Table of Contents

•

Total salaries and benefits expense for the first quarter of 2019 was $56.6 million, an increase of $2.2 million or 4% compared to the same period in 2018. Share-based compensation increased by $1.0 million due to the value of restricted stock units increasing as a result of the Company’s higher share price and additional restricted stock grants being amortized. Medical, dental, and life insurance increased by $1.0 million primarily due to an increase in group health plan costs. In addition, incentive compensation increased by $0.7 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in separation expense.

•

Other noninterest income for the first quarter of 2019 was $5.6 million, a decrease of $1.3 million or 18% compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to a distribution received in the first quarter of 2018 from a low-income housing investment sale totaling $2.8 million. This decrease was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in fees for our customer interest rate swap derivatives and a $0.5 million gain on the sale of leased assets.

We maintained a strong balance sheet during the first quarter of 2019, with what we believe are adequate reserves for credit losses and high levels of liquidity and capital.


•	Total loans and leases were $10.5 billion as of March 31, 2019, an increase of $99.8 million or 1% from December 31, 2018 primarily due to growth in our consumer lending portfolio.

•

The allowance for loan and lease losses (the “Allowance”) was $106.0 million as of March 31, 2019, a decrease of $0.7 million or 1% from December 31, 2018. The Allowance represents 1.01% of total loans and leases outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and 1.02% of total loans and leases outstanding as of December 31, 2018. The level of our Allowance was commensurate with the Company’s credit risk profile, loan portfolio growth and composition, and a healthy Hawaii economy.

•

As of March 31, 2019, the total carrying value of our investment securities portfolio was $5.5 billion, an increase of $38.0 million or 1% compared to December 31, 2018. During the first three months of 2019 we reduced our positions in municipal debt securities and certain mortgage-backed securities as part of a portfolio repositioning. Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities continue to be the largest concentration in our portfolio.


•	Total deposits were $15.3 billion as of March 31, 2019, an increase of $240.1 million or 2% from December 31, 2018 primarily due an increase in consumer deposits due to an increase in core deposits and time deposits.

•

Total shareholders’ equity was $1.3 billion as of March 31, 2019, relatively unchanged from December 31, 2018. We continued to return capital to our shareholders in the form of share repurchases and dividends. During the first three months of 2019, we acquired 552,739 shares of our common stock at a total cost of $43.2 million under our share repurchase program and from shares obtained from employees and/or directors in connection with income tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock and shares purchased for a deferred compensation plan, less shares distributed from the deferred compensation plan. We also paid cash dividends of $25.6 million during the first three months of 2019.

Table of Contents

Our financial highlights are presented in Table 1.



Financial Highlights				Table 1
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2019			2018
For the Period:
Operating Results
Net Interest Income	$	124,837		$	118,956
Provision for Credit Losses	3,000			4,125
Total Noninterest Income	43,679			44,035
Total Noninterest Expense	93,057			94,384
Net Income	58,799			54,040
Basic Earnings Per Share	1.44			1.29
Diluted Earnings Per Share	1.43			1.28
Dividends Declared Per Share	0.62			0.52

Performance Ratios
Return on Average Assets	1.38		%	1.29		%
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity	18.81			17.74
Efficiency Ratio ¹	55.22			57.91
Net Interest Margin ²	3.12			3.00
Dividend Payout Ratio ³	43.06			40.31
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Assets	7.35			7.29

Average Balances
Average Loans and Leases	$	10,467,321		$	9,803,753
Average Assets	17,236,059			16,957,430
Average Deposits	14,971,404			14,720,266
Average Shareholders’ Equity	1,267,438			1,235,550

Market Price Per Share of Common Stock
Closing	$	78.87		$	83.10
High	83.94			89.09
Low	66.54			78.40

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
As of Period End:
Balance Sheet Totals
Loans and Leases	$	10,548,609		$	10,448,774
Total Assets	17,446,413			17,143,974
Total Deposits	15,267,310			15,027,242
Other Debt	110,624			135,643
Total Shareholders’ Equity	1,269,690			1,268,200

Asset Quality
Non-Performing Assets	$	17,925		$	12,930
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	106,023			106,693
Allowance to Loans and Leases Outstanding	1.01		%	1.02		%

Capital Ratios
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio	12.75		%	13.07		%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio	12.75			13.07
Total Capital Ratio	13.87			14.21
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio	7.46			7.60
Total Shareholders’ Equity to Total Assets	7.28			7.40
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets ⁴	7.11			7.23
Tangible Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets⁴	12.28			12.52

Non-Financial Data
Full-Time Equivalent Employees	2,112			2,122
Branches	69			69
ATMs	385			382


¹	Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and total noninterest income).


²	Net interest margin is defined as net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, as a percentage of average earning assets.


³	Dividend payout ratio is defined as dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.


⁴	Tangible common equity to tangible assets and tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets are Non-GAAP financial measures. See the “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below.

Table of Contents

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The ratios “tangible common equity to tangible assets” and “tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets” are Non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes these measurements are useful for investors, regulators, management and others to evaluate capital adequacy relative to other financial institutions. Although these Non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a financial institution, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP. Table 2 provides a reconciliation of these Non-GAAP financial measures with their most closely related GAAP measures.



GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation				Table 2
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Total Shareholders’ Equity	$	1,269,690		$	1,268,200
Less: Goodwill	31,517			31,517
Tangible Common Equity	$	1,238,173		$	1,236,683

Total Assets	$	17,446,413		$	17,143,974
Less: Goodwill	31,517			31,517
Tangible Assets	$	17,414,896		$	17,112,457
Risk-Weighted Assets, determined in accordance with prescribed regulatory requirements	$	10,079,858		$	9,878,904

Total Shareholders’ Equity to Total Assets	7.28		%	7.40		%
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets (Non-GAAP)	7.11		%	7.23		%

Tier 1 Capital Ratio	12.75		%	13.07		%
Tangible Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets (Non-GAAP)	12.28		%	12.52		%

Table of Contents

Analysis of Statements of Income

Average balances, related income and expenses, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 3. An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, is presented in Table 4.



Average Balances and Interest Rates - Taxable-Equivalent Basis									Table 3
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2019						March 31, 2018
	Average		Income/		Yield/		Average		Income/		Yield/
(dollars in millions)	Balance		Expense		Rate		Balance		Expense		Rate
Earning Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks	$	3.0	$	—	2.05	%	$	3.0	$	—	2.34	%
Funds Sold	241.6		1.5		2.39		204.7		0.8		1.48
Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale
Taxable	1,595.8		11.5		2.90		1,595.1		8.9		2.23
Non-Taxable	279.1		2.4		3.45		604.7		4.1		2.74
Held-to-Maturity
Taxable	3,373.5		20.5		2.43		3,631.2		19.8		2.18
Non-Taxable	234.1		1.8		3.15		238.0		1.9		3.18
Total Investment Securities	5,482.5		36.2		2.65		6,069.0		34.7		2.29
Loans Held for Sale	12.4		0.1		4.35		14.1		0.1		3.76
Loans and Leases ¹
Commercial and Industrial	1,357.8		15.3		4.57		1,280.9		11.8		3.73
Commercial Mortgage	2,310.4		24.9		4.36		2,096.4		20.6		3.99
Construction	150.4		1.9		5.08		189.4		2.1		4.45
Commercial Lease Financing	160.9		0.9		2.28		179.6		1.0		2.21
Residential Mortgage	3,680.2		35.5		3.86		3,478.2		33.3		3.83
Home Equity	1,690.0		16.1		3.87		1,595.4		14.6		3.70
Automobile	668.2		6.0		3.66		541.5		5.6		4.19
Other ²	449.4		7.9		7.13		442.4		8.6		7.91
Total Loans and Leases	10,467.3		108.5		4.18		9,803.8		97.6		4.02
Other	35.5		0.3		3.60		40.7		0.3		2.95
Total Earning Assets ³	16,242.3		146.6		3.64		16,135.3		133.5		3.33
Cash and Due From Banks	240.8						228.6
Other Assets	753.0						593.5
Total Assets	$	17,236.1					$	16,957.4

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Demand	$	2,939.9	$	1.5	0.20	%	$	2,978.1	$	0.8	0.10	%
Savings	5,760.8		6.7		0.47		5,366.3		2.1		0.16
Time	1,703.4		7.1		1.69		1,713.5		4.7		1.11
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	10,404.1		15.3		0.60		10,057.9		7.6		0.31
Short-Term Borrowings	31.1		0.2		2.49		19.1		0.1		1.45
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	504.3		4.6		3.63		505.3		4.5		3.61
Other Debt	120.0		0.7		2.55		257.1		1.0		1.54
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	11,059.5		20.8		0.76		10,839.4		13.2		0.49
Net Interest Income			$	125.8					$	120.3
Interest Rate Spread					2.88	%					2.84	%
Net Interest Margin					3.12	%					3.00	%
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits	4,567.3						4,662.4
Other Liabilities	341.9						220.0
Shareholders’ Equity	1,267.4						1,235.6
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	17,236.1					$	16,957.4


¹	Non-performing loans and leases are included in the respective average loan and lease balances. Income, if any, on such loans and leases is recognized on a cash basis.


²	Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.


³	Interest income includes taxable-equivalent basis adjustments, based upon a federal statutory tax rate of 21%, of $1.0 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents



Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income - Taxable-Equivalent Basis							Table 4
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Compared to March 31, 2018
(dollars in millions)	Volume ¹			Rate ¹			Total
Change in Interest Income:
Funds Sold	$	0.2		$	0.5		$	0.7
Investment Securities
Available-for-Sale
Taxable	—			2.6			2.6
Non-Taxable	(2.6		)	0.9			(1.7		)
Held-to-Maturity
Taxable	(1.4		)	2.1			0.7
Non-Taxable	(0.1		)	—			(0.1		)
Total Investment Securities	(4.1		)	5.6			1.5
Loans and Leases
Commercial and Industrial	0.8			2.7			3.5
Commercial Mortgage	2.2			2.1			4.3
Construction	(0.5		)	0.3			(0.2		)
Commercial Lease Financing	(0.1		)	—			(0.1		)
Residential Mortgage	2.0			0.2			2.2
Home Equity	0.8			0.7			1.5
Automobile	1.2			(0.8		)	0.4
Other²	0.2			(0.9		)	(0.7		)
Total Loans and Leases	6.6			4.3			10.9
Other	(0.2		)	0.2			—
Total Change in Interest Income	2.5			10.6			13.1

Change in Interest Expense:
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Demand	—			0.7			0.7
Savings	0.2			4.4			4.6
Time	—			2.4			2.4
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	0.2			7.5			7.7
Short-Term Borrowings	0.1			—			0.1
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	—			0.1			0.1
Other Debt	(0.7		)	0.4			(0.3		)
Total Change in Interest Expense	(0.4		)	8.0			7.6

Change in Net Interest Income	$	2.9		$	2.6		$	5.5


¹	The change in interest income and expense not solely due to changes in volume or rate has been allocated on a pro-rata basis to the volume and rate columns.


²	Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is affected by the size and mix of our balance sheet components as well as the spread between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. Net interest margin is defined as net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, as a percentage of average earning assets.

Table of Contents

Net interest income was $124.8 million for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of $5.9 million or 5% compared to the same period in 2018. On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income was $125.8 million for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of $5.5 million or 5% compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to a higher level of earning assets, including growth in both our commercial and consumer lending portfolios, and higher net interest margin. The higher level of earning assets was primarily funded by higher deposit balances. Net interest margin was 3.12% for the first quarter of 2019, an increase of 12 basis points compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to our loans, which generally have higher yields than our investment securities, comprising a larger percentage of our earning assets compared to 2018. In addition, yields increased for our commercial loans due to higher variable rates and for our investment portfolio due to higher variable rates, lower net amortization, as well as repositioning of lower yielding securities into higher yielding securities.

Yields on our earning assets increased by 31 basis points in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to the shift in the mix of our earning assets from investment securities to loans, which generally have higher yields. Yields on our commercial and industrial loans and construction loans increased by 84 basis points and 63 basis points, respectively, in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018 primarily due to higher yields on floating rate loans. In addition, yields on our investment securities portfolio increased by 36 basis points in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018. These yield increases were partially offset by a 78 basis point decrease in our other loans portfolio primarily due to the completed sale of our MyBankoh Rewards Credit Card portfolio on November 1, 2018 and 53 basis point decrease in our automobile loans portfolio in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same periods in 2018.

Interest rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities increased by 27 basis points in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Increases to our funding costs were primarily due to higher rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits, a reflection of the higher rate environment. The increase in our funding costs was partially offset by a lower average balance of our public time deposits, which decreased by $190.6 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Yields on our funds sold increased by 91 basis points in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to federal fund rate increases.

Average balances of our earning assets increased by $107.0 million or 1% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to loan growth as the average balances of our loan and lease portfolio increased by $663.5 million. Offsetting this increase in the average balance of our loan and lease portfolio was a $586.5 million decrease in the average balance of investment securities. The average balance of our commercial mortgage portfolio increased by $214.0 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 as a result of continued demand from new and existing customers as the Hawaii economy continues to be strong. The average balance in our residential mortgage portfolio increased by $202.0 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to a relatively constant level of loan originations combined with a slowdown in payoff activity. The average balance in our automobile portfolio increased by $126.7 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to steady automobile loan demand. The average balance of our home equity portfolio increased by $94.6 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due largely to continued loan demand in light of a healthy Hawaii economy and stable real estate market conditions. In addition, utilization rates on new and existing home equity lines remained consistent during the first quarter of 2019.

Average balances of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by $220.1 million or 2% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to growth in our relationship savings products, offset by the aforementioned lower average balance in our public time deposit products. Average balance in our core deposit products increased by $356.3 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Average balance in other debt decreased by $137.1 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to the maturing of FHLB advances.

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses (the “Provision”) reflects our judgment of the expense or benefit necessary to achieve the appropriate amount of the Allowance. We maintain the Allowance at levels we believe adequate to cover our estimate of probable credit losses as of the end of the reporting period. The Allowance is determined through detailed quarterly analyses of the loan and lease portfolio. The Allowance is based on our loss experience and changes in the economic environment, as well as an ongoing assessment of credit quality. Additional factors that are considered in determining the amount of the Allowance are the level of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, risk-rating migration, as well as changes in our portfolio size and composition. We recorded a provision of $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to a $4.1 million provision in the same period in 2018. Our decision to record a provision is reflective of our evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance. For further discussion on the Allowance, see “Corporate Risk Profile - Reserve for Credit Losses” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased by $0.4 million or 1% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.

Table 5 presents the components of noninterest income.



Noninterest Income							Table 5
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018			Change
Trust and Asset Management	$	10,761		$	11,181		$	(420	)
Mortgage Banking	2,287			2,145			142
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	7,364			7,129			235
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges	14,208			14,333			(125		)
Investment Securities Gains (Losses), Net	(835		)	(666		)	(169		)
Annuity and Insurance	2,578			1,206			1,372
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	1,710			1,842			(132		)
Other Income	5,606			6,865			(1,259		)
Total Noninterest Income	$	43,679		$	44,035		$	(356	)

Trust and asset management income is comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. These fees are largely based upon the market value of the assets we manage and the fee rate charged to customers. Total trust assets under administration were $10.1 billion and $9.3 billion as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Trust and asset management income decreased by $0.4 million or 4% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to a decrease in termination, transfer, and service fees.

Mortgage banking income is highly influenced by mortgage interest rates, the housing market, the amount of our loan sales, and our valuation of mortgage servicing rights. Mortgage banking income increased by $0.1 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to increased sales of conforming saleable loans from current production.

Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $0.2 million or 3% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in overdraft fees. This increase was partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in account analysis and other fees.

Fees, exchange, and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit and credit card income, fees from ATMs, merchant service activity, and other loan fees and service charges. Fees, exchange, and other service charges remained relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.

Investment securities gains (losses), net totaled $(0.8) million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to $(0.7) million during the same period in 2018. The net losses in the first quarters of 2019 and 2018 were due to quarterly fees paid to the counterparties of our prior Visa Class B share sale transactions. We received these Class B shares in 2008 as part of Visa's initial public offering. These shares are transferable only under limited circumstances until they can be converted into the publicly traded Class A shares. This conversion will not occur until the settlement of certain litigation which is indemnified by Visa members such as the Company. Visa funded an escrow account from its initial public offering to settle these litigation claims. Should this escrow account be insufficient to cover these litigation claims, Visa is entitled to fund additional amounts to the escrow account by reducing each member bank's Class B conversion ratio to unrestricted Class A shares. Concurrent with each sale of Visa Class B shares, we entered into an agreement with the buyer that requires payment to the buyer in the event Visa further reduces the conversion ratio. Based on the existing transfer restriction and the uncertainty of the covered litigation, the remaining 83,014 Visa Class B shares (135,296 Class A equivalents) that we own are carried at a zero cost basis.

Annuity and insurance income increased by $1.4 million or 114% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. This increase was primarily due to a one-time commission received related to insurance products offered through a third-party administrator.

Bank-owned life insurance decreased by $0.1 million or 7% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to death benefits received in the first quarter of 2018.

Table of Contents

Other noninterest income decreased by $1.3 million or 18% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to a distribution received in the first quarter of 2018 from a low-income housing investment sale totaling $2.8 million. This decrease was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in fees for our customer interest rate swap derivatives and a $0.5 million gain on the sale of leased assets.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense decreased by $1.3 million or 1% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.

Table 6 presents the components of noninterest expense.



Noninterest Expense					Table 6
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		Change
Salaries	$	32,480	$	32,704	$	(224	)
Incentive Compensation	5,904		5,178		726
Share-Based Compensation	3,079		2,081		998
Commission Expense	930		954		(24		)
Retirement and Other Benefits	5,107		4,841		266
Payroll Taxes	4,247		4,172		75
Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance	4,465		3,461		1,004
Separation Expense	374		1,031		(657		)
Total Salaries and Benefits	56,586		54,422		2,164
Net Occupancy	7,594		8,534		(940		)
Net Equipment	6,833		5,527		1,306
Data Processing	4,526		3,891		635
Professional Fees	2,453		2,773		(320		)
FDIC Insurance	1,269		2,157		(888		)
Other Expense:
Delivery and Postage Services	2,078		2,289		(211		)
Mileage Program Travel	1,180		1,135		45
Merchant Transaction and Card Processing Fees	1,275		1,328		(53		)
Advertising	1,527		1,255		272
Amortization of Solar Energy Partnership Investments	940		916		24
Other	6,796		10,157		(3,361		)
Total Other Expense	13,796		17,080		(3,284		)
Total Noninterest Expense	$	93,057	$	94,384	$	(1,327	)

Total salaries and benefits expense increased by $2.2 million or 4% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Share-based compensation increased by $1.0 million due to the value of restricted stock units increasing as a result of the Company’s higher share price and additional restricted stock grants being amortized. Medical, dental, and life insurance increased by $1.0 million primarily due to an increase in group health plan costs. In addition, incentive compensation increased by $0.7 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in separation expense.

Net occupancy decreased by $0.9 million or 11% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.6 million gain on sale of real estate property on the island of Oahu during the first quarter of 2019 coupled with a $0.5 million decrease in net rental expense.

Net equipment increased by $1.3 million or 24% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. These increases were due to higher depreciation expense.

Data processing increased by $0.6 million or 16% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to ongoing information technology projects.

Professional fees decreased by $0.3 million or 12% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to a $0.2 million decrease in professional services primarily in our mortgage division and a $0.1 million decrease in legal fees.

Table of Contents

FDIC insurance decreased by $0.9 million of 41% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to the end of an FDIC surcharge in September 2018 and a decrease in FDIC assessment rates.

Total other expense decreased by $3.3 million or 19% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 due to a $2.0 million legal reserve recorded in first quarter 2018 and a $0.9 million decrease in credit card expense due to the completed sale of our MyBankoh Rewards Credit Card portfolio on November 1, 2018. We also experienced a decrease in delivery and postage ($0.2 million) and operating losses ($0.2 million).

Provision for Income Taxes

Table 7 presents our provision for income taxes and effective tax rates.



Provision for Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rates				Table 7
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018
Provision for Income Taxes	$	13,660		$	10,442
Effective Tax Rates	18.85		%	16.19		%

The provision for income taxes was $13.7 million in the first quarter of 2019, an increase of $3.2 million or 31% compared to the same period in 2018. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2019 was 18.85%, up from 16.19% for the same period in 2018. The higher effective rate in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 was primarily due to a benefit recorded in first quarter of 2018 for a basis adjustment to the company’s low income housing investment. The tax rate was also unfavorably impacted by higher pretax book income compared to a fixed amount of tax credits and a reduced tax benefit from municipal bonds, which were sold as part of a portfolio repositioning. This was partially offset by a $1.9 million tax benefit from an early buyout of a leveraged lease.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Statements of Condition

Investment Securities

The carrying value of our investment securities portfolio was $5.5 billion as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2019, our investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities with an average base duration of approximately 3.3 years.

We continually evaluate our investment securities portfolio in response to established asset/liability management objectives, changing market conditions that could affect profitability, and the level of interest rate risk to which we are exposed. These evaluations may cause us to change the level of funds we deploy into investment securities, change the composition of our investment securities portfolio, and change the proportion of investments made into the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment categories.

During the first three months of 2019 we reduced our positions in municipal debt securities and certain mortgage-backed securities as part of a portfolio repositioning. Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities continue to be the largest concentration in our portfolio. As of March 31, 2019, our portfolio of Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities was primarily comprised of securities issued in 2008 or later. As of March 31, 2019, these mortgage-backed securities were all AAA-rated, with a low probability of a change in their credit ratings in the near future. As of March 31, 2019, our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities with an average base duration of approximately 2.4 years.

Gross unrealized gains in our investment securities portfolio were $31.8 million as of March 31, 2019 and $21.2 million as of December 31, 2018. Gross unrealized losses on our temporarily impaired investment securities were $68.3 million as of March 31, 2019 and $103.5 million as of December 31, 2018. The lower unrealized losses were primarily caused by the decrease in interest rates during the first quarter of 2019. The gross unrealized loss positions were primarily related to mortgage-backed securities issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and corporate debt securities. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

As of March 31, 2019, included in our investment securities portfolio were debt securities issued by political subdivisions within the State of Hawaii of $408.8 million, representing 98% of the total fair value of the Company’s municipal debt securities. Of the entire Hawaii municipal bond portfolio, 94% were credit-rated Aa2 or better by Moody’s. Most of the remaining Hawaii municipal bonds were credit-rated A1 or better by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Approximately 80% of our Hawaii municipal bond holdings were general obligation issuances.

Loans and Leases

Table 8 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by major categories.



Loan and Lease Portfolio Balances			Table 8
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,331,345	$	1,331,149
Commercial Mortgage	2,381,213		2,302,356
Construction	132,775		170,061
Lease Financing	154,919		176,226
Total Commercial	4,000,252		3,979,792
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	3,702,553		3,673,796
Home Equity	1,698,666		1,681,442
Automobile	676,730		658,133
Other ¹	470,408		455,611
Total Consumer	6,548,357		6,468,982
Total Loans and Leases	$	10,548,609	$	10,448,774


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Total loans and leases as of March 31, 2019 increased by $99.8 million or 1% from December 31, 2018 primarily due to growth in our consumer lending portfolio.

Table of Contents

Commercial loans and leases as of March 31, 2019 increased by $20.5 million or 1% from December 31, 2018. Commercial mortgage loans increased by $78.9 million or 3% from December 31, 2018 primarily due to continued demand from new and existing customers as the Hawaii economy continues to be strong. Construction loans decreased by $37.3 million or 22% from December 31, 2018 primarily due to paydowns and successful completion of construction projects such as condominiums and low-income housing, partially offset by increased activity in our portfolio. Lease financing decreased by $21.3 million or 12% from December 31, 2018 primarily due to a lessee exercising its early buy-out option on a leveraged lease in the first quarter of 2019.

Consumer loans and leases as of March 31, 2019 increased by $79.4 million or 1% from December 31, 2018. Residential mortgage loans increased by $28.8 million or 1% from December 31, 2018, primarily due to steady loan originations which was offset by an increase in payoff activity. Automobile loans increased by $18.6 million or 3% from December 31, 2018 primarily driven by competitive loan programs. Home equity lines and loans increased by $17.2 million or 1% from December 31, 2018 as a result of consistent loan demand in light of a healthy Hawaii economy and stable real estate market conditions. Additionally, utilization rates remained steady on existing home equity lines during 2019. Other consumer loans increased by $14.8 million or 3% from December 31, 2018, primarily due to growth in our installment loans.

Table of Contents

Table 9 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by geographic area and by major categories.



Geographic Distribution of Loan and Lease Portfolio											Table 9
(dollars in thousands)	Hawaii		U.S. Mainland ¹		Guam		Other Pacific Islands		Foreign ²		Total
March 31, 2019
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,139,897	$	113,148	$	72,857	$	5,079	$	364	$	1,331,345
Commercial Mortgage	2,030,068		114,586		236,086		473		—		2,381,213
Construction	132,775		—		—		—		—		132,775
Lease Financing	59,320		91,502		732		—		3,365		154,919
Total Commercial	3,362,060		319,236		309,675		5,552		3,729		4,000,252
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	3,626,523		—		74,706		1,324		—		3,702,553
Home Equity	1,660,640		137		36,843		1,046		—		1,698,666
Automobile	526,837		—		135,642		14,251		—		676,730
Other ³	385,904		—		56,172		28,332		—		470,408
Total Consumer	6,199,904		137		303,363		44,953		—		6,548,357
Total Loans and Leases	$	9,561,964	$	319,373	$	613,038	$	50,505	$	3,729	$	10,548,609

December 31, 2018
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,142,172	$	100,786	$	86,763	$	1,277	$	151	$	1,331,149
Commercial Mortgage	1,926,172		115,209		260,501		474		—		2,302,356
Construction	170,061		—		—		—		—		170,061
Lease Financing	61,813		109,933		786		—		3,694		176,226
Total Commercial	3,300,218		325,928		348,050		1,751		3,845		3,979,792
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	3,596,908		—		75,373		1,515		—		3,673,796
Home Equity	1,643,529		161		36,571		1,181		—		1,681,442
Automobile	513,836		—		131,967		12,330		—		658,133
Other ³	372,767		—		53,992		28,852		—		455,611
Total Consumer	6,127,040		161		297,903		43,878		—		6,468,982
Total Loans and Leases	$	9,427,258	$	326,089	$	645,953	$	45,629	$	3,845	$	10,448,774


¹	For secured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on where the collateral is located. For unsecured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on the location where the majority of the borrower’s business operations are conducted.


²	Loans and leases classified as Foreign represent those which are recorded in the Company’s international business units.


³	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Our commercial and consumer lending activities are concentrated primarily in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. Our commercial loan and lease portfolio to borrowers based on the U.S. Mainland includes leveraged lease financing and participation in Shared National Credits.

Our Hawaii loan and lease portfolio increased by $134.7 million or 1% from December 31, 2018, reflective of a healthy Hawaii economy.

Table of Contents

Other Assets

Table 10 presents the major components of other assets.



Other Assets			Table 10
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock	$	34,970	$	35,858
Derivative Financial Instruments	16,240		14,604
Low-Income Housing and Other Equity Investments	82,352		85,860
Deferred Compensation Plan Assets	35,387		31,871
Prepaid Expenses	13,118		8,533
Accounts Receivable	39,314		18,996
Other	34,806		35,160
Total Other Assets	$	256,187	$	230,882

Total other assets increased by $25.3 million or 11% from December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $20.3 million increase in accounts receivable, which was primarily due to a $20.0 million matured security in the first quarter of 2019. In addition, prepaid expenses increased $4.6 million primarily due an increase in prepaid insurance and other expenses.

Deposits

Table 11 presents the composition of our deposits by major customer categories.



Deposits			Table 11
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Consumer	$	7,944,793	$	7,726,731
Commercial	6,162,042		6,098,186
Public and Other	1,160,475		1,202,325
Total Deposits	$	15,267,310	$	15,027,242

Total deposits were $15.3 billion as of March 31, 2019, an increase of $240.1 million or 2% from December 31, 2018. This

increase was primarily due to a $218.1 million increase in consumer deposits due to an increase in core deposits and time deposits of $198.6 million and $19.5 million respectively. In addition, commercial deposits increased by $63.9 million primarily due to a $64.4 million increase in core deposits. These increases were partially offset by a $41.9 million decrease in public and other deposits.

Table 12 presents the composition of our savings deposits.



Savings Deposits			Table 12
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Money Market	$	2,250,901	$	1,973,979
Regular Savings	3,695,980		3,565,220
Total Savings Deposits	$	5,946,881	$	5,539,199

Table of Contents

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Table 13 presents the composition of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase.



Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase			Table 13
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Private Institutions	$	500,000	$	500,000
Government Entities	4,299		4,296
Total Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	$	504,299	$	504,296

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase was $504.3 million as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2019, the weighted-average maturity was 234 days for our repurchase agreements with government entities and 2.4 years for our repurchase agreements with private institutions. Some of our repurchase agreements with private institutions may be terminated at earlier specified dates by the private institution or in some cases by either the private institution or the Company. If all such agreements were to terminate at the earliest possible date, the weighted-average maturity for our repurchase agreements with private institutions would decrease to 1.8 years. As of March 31, 2019, the weighted-average interest rate for outstanding agreements with government entities and private institutions was 1.61% and 3.64%, respectively, with all rates being fixed. Each of our repurchase agreements is accounted for as a collateralized financing arrangement (i.e., a secured borrowing) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities.

Other Debt

Table 14 presents the composition of our other debt.



Other Debt			Table 14
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances	$	100,000	$	125,000
Capital Lease Obligations	10,624		10,643
Total	$	110,624	$	135,643

Other debt was $110.6 million as of March 31, 2019, a decrease of $25.0 million or 18% from December 31, 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a $25.0 million FHLB advance which matured during the first quarter of 2019. As of March 31, 2019, our FHLB advances had a weighted-average interest rate of 2.12% with maturity dates ranging from 2019 to 2020. These advances were primarily for asset/liability management purposes. As of March 31, 2019, our remaining unused line of credit with the FHLB was $2.3 billion.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Business Segments

Our business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services and Private Banking, and Treasury and Other.

Table 15 summarizes net income from our business segments. Additional information about segment performance is presented in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



Business Segment Net Income			Table 15
	Three Months Ended March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019		2018
Retail Banking	$	24,517	$	19,017
Commercial Banking	25,948		21,535
Investment Services and Private Banking	4,828		5,456
Total	55,293		46,008
Treasury and Other	3,506		8,032
Consolidated Total	$	58,799	$	54,040

Retail Banking

Net income increased by $5.5 million or 29% in the first quarter of 2019 primarily due to increases in noninterest income and net interest income, and a decrease in noninterest expense and the Provision. This was partially offset by an increase in the provision for income taxes. The increase in noninterest income was primarily due to a one-time commission received related to insurance products offered through a third-party administrator, as well as an increase in overdraft fees. The increase in net interest income was due to higher average rates and higher average balances in the segment’s deposit portfolio and higher average balances in the segment’s loan portfolio. This was partially offset by lower average rates in the segment’s loan portfolio. The decrease in noninterest expense was primarily related to a $2.0 million increase in legal reserves recorded in the first quarter of 2018, and lower credit card expenses related to the aforementioned sale of our MyBankoh Rewards Credit Card portfolio. This was partially offset by higher allocated administrative, technology and operations expense. The decrease in the Provision was primarily due to lower net charge-offs due to the sale of our MyBankoh Rewards Credit Card portfolio, as well as lower net charge-offs in our auto loan and residential mortgage portfolios. This was partially offset by higher net charge-offs in our installment loan portfolio. The provision for income taxes increased due to higher pretax book income.

Commercial Banking

Net income increased by $4.4 million or 20% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to increases in net interest income and noninterest income. This was partially offset by increases in provision for losses and noninterest expense. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher earnings credits on the segment’s deposit and growth in the segment’s loan portfolio. The increase in noninterest income was due to higher fees related to our customer interest rate swap derivative program and to higher net gains on the sale of equipment leases. The increase in the provision for losses was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans in the segment. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher allocated expenses.

Investment Services and Private Banking

Net income decreased by $0.6 million or 12% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to an increase in noninterest expense and decrease in noninterest revenue which was partially offset higher net interest income. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily driven by higher allocated expenses. The decrease in noninterest revenue was driven by lower trust service fees and lower service charges on deposit accounts. The increase in net interest income was primarily driven by the transfer of deposits from the Retail Banking segment and higher earnings credit on segment’s deposit portfolio.

Table of Contents

Treasury and Other

Net income decreased by $4.5 million or 56% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 primarily due to a reduction in noninterest income and a lower provision for income taxes. This was partially offset by a decrease in the Provision. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to a distribution received from a low-income housing investment sale in the first quarter of 2018. The provision for income taxes in this business segment represents the residual amount to arrive at the total tax expense for the Company. The overall effective tax rate increased to 18.85% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to 16.19% in the first quarter of 2018.

Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) included in Treasury and Other provide a wide range of support to the Company's other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.

Corporate Risk Profile

Credit Risk

As of March 31, 2019, our overall credit risk profile reflects a healthy Hawaii economy as our levels of non-performing assets and credit losses remain well controlled. The underlying risk profile of our lending portfolio continued to remain strong during the first three months of 2019.

We actively manage exposures with deteriorating asset quality to reduce levels of potential loss exposure and closely monitor our reserves and capital to address both anticipated and unforeseen issues. Risk management activities include detailed analysis of portfolio segments and stress tests of certain segments to ensure that reserve and capital levels are appropriate. We perform frequent loan and lease-level risk monitoring and risk rating reviews, which provide opportunities for early interventions to allow for credit exits or restructuring, loan and lease sales, and voluntary workouts and liquidations.

Table of Contents

Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More

Table 16 presents information on non-performing assets (“NPAs”) and accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more.



Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More				Table 16
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Non-Performing Assets
Non-Accrual Loans and Leases
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	393		$	542
Commercial Mortgage	5,911			2,040
Total Commercial	6,304			2,582
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	5,599			5,321
Home Equity	2,797			3,671
Total Consumer	8,396			8,992
Total Non-Accrual Loans and Leases	14,700			11,574
Foreclosed Real Estate	3,225			1,356
Total Non-Performing Assets	$	17,925		$	12,930

Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	66		$	10
Total Commercial	66			10
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	$	903		$	2,446
Home Equity	3,381			2,684
Automobile	734			513
Other ¹	1,033			914
Total Consumer	6,051			6,557
Total Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More	$	6,117		$	6,567
Restructured Loans on Accrual Status and Not Past Due 90 Days or More	$	48,571		$	48,731
Total Loans and Leases	$	10,548,609		$	10,448,774
Ratio of Non-Accrual Loans and Leases to Total Loans and Leases	0.14		%	0.11		%
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets to Total Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate	0.17		%	0.12		%
Ratio of Commercial Non-Performing Assets to Total Commercial Loans and Leases and Commercial Foreclosed Real Estate	0.16		%	0.06		%
Ratio of Consumer Non-Performing Assets to Total Consumer Loans and Leases and Consumer Foreclosed Real Estate	0.18		%	0.16		%
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate	0.23		%	0.19		%
Changes in Non-Performing Assets
Balance as of December 31, 2018	$	12,930
Additions	8,217
Reductions
Payments	(989		)
Return to Accrual Status	(316		)
Sales of Foreclosed Real Estate	—
Charge-offs/Write-downs	(1,917		)
Total Reductions	(3,222		)
Balance as of March 31, 2019	$	17,925


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Table of Contents

NPAs consist of non-accrual loans and leases, and foreclosed real estate. Changes in the level of non-accrual loans and leases typically represent increases for loans and leases that reach a specified past due status, offset by reductions for loans and leases that are charged-off, paid down, sold, transferred to foreclosed real estate, or are no longer classified as non-accrual because they have returned to accrual status.

Total NPAs were $17.9 million as of March 31, 2019, an increase of $5.0 million or 39% from December 31, 2018. The ratio of our NPAs to total loans and leases and foreclosed real estate was 0.17% as of March 31, 2019 and 0.12% as of December 31, 2018.

Commercial mortgage non-accrual loans were $5.9 million as of March 31, 2019, an increase of $3.9 million or 190% from December 31, 2018 due to one additional loan. We have evaluated the three remaining commercial mortgage non-accrual loans for impairment and recorded a charge-off of $1.6 million on one of the loans.

Residential mortgage non-accrual loans were $5.6 million as of March 31, 2019, relatively unchanged from December 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2019, our residential mortgage non-accrual loans were comprised of 19 loans with a weighted average current loan-to-value ratio of 64%.

Foreclosed real estate represents property acquired as the result of borrower defaults on loans. Foreclosed real estate is recorded at fair value, less estimated selling costs, at the time of foreclosure. On an ongoing basis, properties are appraised as required by market conditions and applicable regulations. Foreclosed real estate increased by $1.9 million or 138% from December 31, 2018 due to the addition of four residential properties.

Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing Interest

Loans and leases in this category are 90 days or more past due, as to principal or interest, and are still accruing interest because they are well secured and in the process of collection. Loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest were $6.1 million as of March 31, 2019, a $0.5 million or 7% decrease from December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily in residential mortgage loans, which was offset by an increase in the home equity portfolio.

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are defined as loans for which we believe it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Included in impaired loans are all classes of commercial non-accruing loans (except lease financing and small business loans), all loans modified in a TDR (including accruing TDRs), and other loans where we believe that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans exclude lease financing and smaller balance homogeneous loans (consumer and small business non-accruing loans) that are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans were $58.0 million as of March 31, 2019 and $54.6 million as of December 31, 2018, and had a related Allowance of $3.9 million as of March 31, 2019 and $4.0 million as of December 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2019, we have recorded cumulative charge-offs of $9.2 million related to our total impaired loans. Our impaired loans are considered in management’s assessment of the overall adequacy of the Allowance.

Table of Contents

Table 17 presents information on loans with terms that have been modified in a TDR.



Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring			Table 17
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	$	6,621	$	6,198
Commercial Mortgage	7,277		4,144
Construction	1,294		1,321
Total Commercial	15,192		11,663
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	19,313		19,753
Home Equity	3,281		3,359
Automobile	17,784		17,117
Other ¹	1,991		2,098
Total Consumer	42,369		42,327
Total	$	57,561	$	53,990


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Loans modified in a TDR increased by $3.6 million or 7% from December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to one commercial mortgage loan modified in a TDR during the first quarter of 2019. Residential mortgage loans remain our largest TDR loan class.

Table of Contents

Reserve for Credit Losses

Table 18 presents the activity in our reserve for credit losses.



Reserve for Credit Losses							Table 18
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2019			2018			2018
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	113,515		$	115,512		$	114,168
Loans and Leases Charged-Off
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	(370		)	(365		)	(206		)
Commercial Mortgage	(1,616		)	—			—
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	(4		)	(1		)	(97		)
Home Equity	(295		)	(406		)	(91		)
Automobile	(1,753		)	(2,335		)	(2,254		)
Other ¹	(2,790		)	(3,781		)	(3,340		)
Total Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(6,828		)	(6,888		)	(5,988		)
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial	501			803			328
Consumer
Residential Mortgage	484			112			220
Home Equity	588			367			625
Automobile	881			949			599
Other ¹	704			660			683
Total Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	3,158			2,891			2,455
Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off	(3,670		)	(3,997		)	(3,533		)
Provision for Credit Losses	3,000			2,000			4,125
Balance at End of Period ²	$	112,845		$	113,515		$	114,760

Components
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	$	106,023		$	106,693		$	107,938
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments	6,822			6,822			6,822
Total Reserve for Credit Losses	$	112,845		$	113,515		$	114,760

Average Loans and Leases Outstanding	$	10,467,321		$	10,320,051		$	9,803,753

Ratio of Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off to Average Loans and Leases Outstanding (annualized)	0.14		%	0.15		%	0.15		%
Ratio of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to Loans and Leases Outstanding	1.01		%	1.02		%	1.09		%


¹	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.


²	Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s reserve for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition.

We maintain a reserve for credit losses that consists of two components, the Allowance and a reserve for unfunded commitments (the “Unfunded Reserve”). The reserve for credit losses provides for the risk of credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and is based on loss estimates derived from a comprehensive quarterly evaluation. The evaluation reflects analyses of individual borrowers and historical loss experience, supplemented as necessary by credit judgment that considers observable trends, conditions, and other relevant environmental and economic factors. The level of the Allowance is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery through the Provision. The level of the Unfunded Reserve is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery in other noninterest expense.

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

As of March 31, 2019, the Allowance was $106.0 million or 1.01% of total loans and leases outstanding, compared with an Allowance of $106.7 million or 1.02% of total loans and leases outstanding as of December 31, 2018. The decrease in the ratio of Allowance to loans and leases outstanding was commensurate with the Company’s credit risk profile, loan growth, and a healthy Hawaii economy.

Net charge-offs on loans and leases were $3.7 million or 0.14% of total average loans and leases, on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2019 compared to net charge-offs of $3.5 million or 0.15% of total average loans and leases, on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2018. Net charge-offs in our consumer portfolios were $2.2 million compared to $3.7 million for the same period in 2018. Net charge-offs in our commercial portfolios were $1.5 million for the first three months of 2019 compared to $0.1 million net recoveries for the same period in 2018.

Although we determine the amount of each component of the Allowance separately, the Allowance as a whole was considered appropriate by management as of March 31, 2019, based on our ongoing analysis of estimated probable credit losses, credit risk profiles, economic conditions, coverage ratios, and other relevant factors.

The Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The Unfunded Reserve was $6.8 million as of March 31, 2019, unchanged from December 31, 2018. The process used to determine the Unfunded Reserve is consistent with the process for determining the Allowance, as adjusted for estimated funding probabilities.

Table of Contents

Market Risk

Market risk is the potential of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and prices. We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of the normal course of conducting our business activities. Our market risk management process involves measuring, monitoring, controlling, and mitigating risks that can significantly impact our statements of income and condition. In this management process, market risks are balanced with expected returns in an effort to enhance earnings performance, while limiting volatility.

Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk.

Interest Rate Risk

The objective of our interest rate risk management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity. The potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. This interest rate risk arises primarily from our core business activities of extending loans and accepting deposits. Our investment securities portfolio is also subject to significant interest rate risk.

Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, and repricing characteristics of financial instruments. Our earnings are affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Bank (the “FRB”). The monetary policies of the FRB can influence the overall growth of loans, investment securities, and deposits and the level of interest rates earned on assets and paid for liabilities.

In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), measure short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates. The ALCO, which is comprised of members of executive management, utilizes several techniques to manage interest rate risk, which include:


•	adjusting the balance sheet mix or altering the interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities;


•	changing product pricing strategies;


•	modifying characteristics of the investment securities portfolio; and


•	using derivative financial instruments.

Our use of derivative financial instruments, as detailed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, has generally been limited. This is due to natural on-balance sheet hedges arising out of offsetting interest rate exposures from loans and investment securities with deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. In particular, the investment securities portfolio is utilized to manage the interest rate exposure and sensitivity to within the guidelines and limits established by the ALCO. We utilize natural and offsetting economic hedges in an effort to reduce the need to employ off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk exposures. Expected movements in interest rates are also considered in managing interest rate risk. Thus, as interest rates change, we may use different techniques to manage interest rate risk.

A key element in our ongoing process to measure and monitor interest rate risk is the utilization of an asset/liability simulation model that attempts to capture the dynamic nature of the statement of condition. The model is used to estimate and measure the statement of condition sensitivity to changes in interest rates. These estimates are based on assumptions about the behavior of loan and deposit pricing, repayment rates on mortgage-based assets, and principal amortization and maturities on other financial instruments. The model’s analytics include the effects of standard prepayment options on mortgages and customer withdrawal options for deposits. While such assumptions are inherently uncertain, we believe that our assumptions are reasonable.

Table of Contents

We utilize net interest income simulations to analyze short-term income sensitivities to changes in interest rates. Table 19 presents, for the twelve months subsequent to March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, an estimate of the change in net interest income that would result from a gradual and immediate change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve, relative to the measured base case scenario. The base case scenario assumes the statement of condition and interest rates are generally unchanged. Based on our net interest income simulation as of March 31, 2019, net interest income is expected to increase as interest rates rise. This is due in part to our strategy to maintain a relatively short investment portfolio duration. In addition, rising interest rates would drive higher rates on loans and investment securities, as well as induce a slower pace of premium amortization on certain securities within our investment portfolio. However, lower interest rates would likely cause a decline in net interest income as lower rates would lead to lower yields on loans and investment securities, as well as drive higher premium amortization on existing investment securities. Based on our net interest income simulation as of March 31, 2019, net interest income sensitivity to changes in interest rates for the twelve months subsequent to March 31, 2019 was slightly more sensitive in comparison to the sensitivity profile for the twelve months subsequent to December 31, 2018.



Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile									Table 19
	Impact on Future Annual Net Interest Income
(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2019					December 31, 2018
Gradual Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
+200	$	12,489		2.5	%	$	11,014		2.2	%
+100	6,541			1.3		5,673			1.1
-100	(7,303		)	(1.4	)	(6,289		)	(1.2	)

Immediate Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
+200	$	27,069		5.3	%	$	23,309		4.6	%
+100	15,099			3.0		12,517			2.5
-100	(21,945		)	(4.3	)	(17,665		)	(3.5	)

To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest rate scenarios are also simulated. These non-parallel interest rate scenarios indicate that net interest income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten or become inverted for a period of time. Conversely, if the yield curve were to steepen, net interest income may increase.

Other Market Risks

In addition to interest rate risk, we are exposed to other forms of market risk in our normal business transactions. Foreign currency and foreign exchange contracts expose us to a small degree of foreign currency risk. These transactions are primarily executed on behalf of customers. Our trust and asset management income are at risk to fluctuations in the market values of underlying assets, particularly debt and equity securities. Also, our share-based compensation expense is dependent on the fair value of our stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock is impacted by the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date of grant and is at risk to changes in equity markets, general economic conditions, and other factors.

Table of Contents

Liquidity Risk Management

The objective of our liquidity risk management process is to manage cash flow and liquidity in an effort to provide continuous access to sufficient, reasonably priced funds. Funding requirements are impacted by loan originations and refinancings, deposit balance changes, liability issuances and settlements, and off-balance sheet funding commitments. We consider and comply with various regulatory guidelines regarding required liquidity levels and periodically monitor our liquidity position in light of the changing economic environment and customer activity. Based on periodic liquidity assessments, we may alter our asset, liability, and off-balance sheet positions. The ALCO monitors sources and uses of funds and modifies asset and liability positions as liquidity requirements change. This process, combined with our ability to raise funds in money and capital markets and through private placements, provides flexibility in managing the exposure to liquidity risk.

In an effort to satisfy our liquidity needs, we actively manage our assets and liabilities. We have access to immediate liquid

resources in the form of cash which is primarily on deposit with the FRB. Potential sources of liquidity also include investment

securities in our available-for-sale securities portfolio, our ability to sell loans in the secondary market, and to secure borrowings from the FRB and FHLB. Our held-to-maturity securities, while not intended for sale, may also be utilized in repurchase agreements to obtain funding. Our core deposits have historically provided us with a long-term source of stable and relatively lower cost source of funding. Additional funding is available through the issuance of long-term debt or equity.

Maturities and payments on outstanding loans and investment securities also provide a steady flow of funds. Liquidity is further enhanced by our ability to pledge loans to access secured borrowings from the FHLB and FRB. As of March 31, 2019, we had additional borrowing capacity of $2.3 billion from the FHLB and $551.2 million from the FRB based on the amount of collateral pledged.

We continued our focus on maintaining a strong liquidity position throughout the first three months of 2019. As of March 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents were $541.3 million, the carrying value of our available-for-sale investment securities was $1.9 billion, and total deposits were $15.3 billion. As of March 31, 2019, our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities with an average base duration of approximately 2.4 years.

Capital Management

We actively manage capital, commensurate with our risk profile, to enhance shareholder value. We also seek to maintain capital levels for the Company and the Bank at amounts in excess of the regulatory “well-capitalized” thresholds. Periodically, we may respond to market conditions by implementing changes to our overall balance sheet positioning to manage our capital position.

The Company and the Bank are each subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could cause certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, would likely have a material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative and qualitative measures. These measures were established by regulation intended to ensure capital adequacy. As of March 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank were considered “well capitalized” under this regulatory framework. The Company’s regulatory capital ratios are presented in Table 20 below. There have been no conditions or events since March 31, 2019 that management believes have changed either the Company’s or the Bank’s capital classifications.

As of March 31, 2019, shareholders’ equity was $1.3 billion, relatively unchanged from December 31, 2018. For the first three months of 2019, net income of $58.8 million, common stock issuances of $2.1 million, share-based compensation of $2.3 million, and other comprehensive income of $7.2 million were partially offset by cash dividends paid of $25.6 million and common stock repurchased of $43.2 million. In the first three months of 2019, we repurchased 513,394 shares under our share repurchase program. These shares were repurchased at an average cost per share of $77.79 and a total cost of $39.9 million. From the beginning of our share repurchase program in July 2001 through March 31, 2019, we repurchased a total of 55.8 million shares of common stock and returned a total of $2.2 billion to our shareholders at an average cost of $39.50 per share.

From April 1, 2019 through April 16, 2019, the Parent repurchased an additional 98,000 shares of common stock at an average cost of $80.65 per share for a total of $7.9 million. Remaining buyback authority under our share repurchase program was $113.9 million as of April 16, 2019. The actual amount and timing of future share repurchases, if any, will depend on market and economic conditions, regulatory rules, applicable SEC rules, and various other factors.

Table of Contents

In April 2019, the Parent’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.65 per share on the Parent’s outstanding shares. The dividend will be payable on June 14, 2019 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 31, 2019.

The final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (“BCBS”) capital guidelines for U.S. banks became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule, which was fully phased in on January 1, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s capital levels remained characterized as “well-capitalized” under the new rules. See the “Regulatory Initiatives Affecting the Banking Industry” section below for further discussion on Basel III.

Table 20 presents our regulatory capital and ratios as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.



Regulatory Capital and Ratios						Table 20
(dollars in thousands)		March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
Regulatory Capital
Shareholders’ Equity		$	1,269,690			$	1,268,200
Less:	Goodwill¹	28,718				28,718
	Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments	(35,765		)		(36,010		)
	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investment Securities²	(8,113		)		(15,033		)
	Other	(198		)		(198		)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital		1,285,048				1,290,723

Tier 1 Capital		1,285,048				1,290,723
Allowable Reserve for Credit Losses		112,845				113,515
Total Regulatory Capital		$	1,397,893			$	1,404,238

Risk-Weighted Assets		$	10,079,858			$	9,878,904

Key Regulatory Capital Ratios
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio		12.75			%	13.07			%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		12.75				13.07
Total Capital Ratio		13.87				14.21
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		7.46				7.60

¹Calculated net of deferred tax liabilities.

²Includes unrealized gains and losses related to the Company’s reclassification of available-for-sale investment securities to the held-to-maturity category.

Table of Contents

Regulatory Initiatives Affecting the Banking Industry

Basel III

Under final FRB and FDIC approved rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Company. The Basel III capital standards substantially revised the risk based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including the definitions and the components of Tier 1 capital and Total Capital, the method of evaluating risk-weighted assets, institutions of a capital conservation buffer, and other matters affecting regulatory capital ratios. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the rules.

The phase-in period for the final rules became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rules’ requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule, which was fully phased in on January 1, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s capital levels remained characterized as “well-capitalized” under the new rules.

Management continues to monitor regulatory developments and their potential impact to the Company’s liquidity requirements.

Stress Testing

Enactment of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act in May 2018 significantly altered several provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, including how stress tests are run. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $100 billion, such as the Company, are no longer subject to company-run stress testing requirements in section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act, including publishing a summary of results. At this time, the Company continues to run internal stress tests as a component of our comprehensive risk management and capital planning process.

Deposit Insurance Fund Assessment

On September 30, 2018, the FDIC terminated a temporary surcharge of 4.5 cents per $100 of assessment base (after certain adjustments) on bank with at least $10 billion in assets, such as the Company. A further reduction in assessment rates will occur if and when the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund Reserve Ratio reaches 2.0 percent.

Operational Risk

Operational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, failure to adhere to compliance requirements, and the risk of cyber attacks. We are also exposed to operational risk through our outsourcing arrangements, and the effect that changes in circumstances or capabilities of our outsourcing vendors can have on our ability to continue to perform operational functions necessary to our business. The risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. Operational risk is inherent in all business activities, and management of this risk is important to the achievement of Company goals and objectives.

Our Operating Risk Committee (the “ORC”) provides oversight and assesses the most significant operational risks facing the Company. We have developed a framework that provides for a centralized operating risk management function through the ORC, supplemented by business unit responsibility for managing operational risks specific to their business units. Our internal audit department also validates the system of internal controls through ongoing risk-based audit procedures and reports on the effectiveness of internal controls to executive management and the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.

We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to improve the oversight of operational risk. While our internal controls have been designed to minimize operational risks, there is no assurance that business disruption or operational losses will not occur. On an ongoing basis, management reassesses operational risks, implements appropriate process changes, and invests in enhancements to our systems of internal controls.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Credit Commitments, and Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We hold interests in several unconsolidated VIEs. These unconsolidated VIEs are primarily low-income housing partnerships and solar energy partnerships. Variable interests are defined as contractual ownership or other interests in an entity that change with fluctuations in an entity’s net asset value. The primary beneficiary consolidates the VIE. We have determined that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of these entities. As a result, we do not consolidate these VIEs.

Credit Commitments and Contractual Obligations

Our credit commitments and contractual obligations have not changed materially since previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See “Market Risk” of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2019. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2019.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2019 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II - Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, except as described below.

Uncertainty About the Continuing Availability of LIBOR May Adversely Affect Our Business

On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) announced that after December 31, 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR. With this announcement there is uncertainty about the continued availability of LIBOR after 2021. If LIBOR ceases to be available or the methods of calculating LIBOR change from the current methods, financial products with interest rates tied to LIBOR may be adversely affected. Even if LIBOR remains available it is uncertain whether it will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR or what the effect of any such changes in views or alternatives may be on the markets for LIBOR-indexed financial instruments. We have loans, derivative contracts, and other financial instruments with rates that are either directly or indirectly tied to LIBOR. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the interest rates on these instruments, as well as the revenue and expenses associated with the same, may be adversely affected. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with our customers could adversely impact our reputation.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Parent’s repurchases of its common stock during the first quarter of 2019 were as follows:



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased ¹	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ²
January 1 - 31, 2019	215,289	$	73.53	213,500		$	146,016,271
February 1 - 28, 2019	145,000	81.14		145,000		134,251,060
March 1 - 31, 2019	193,015	80.93		154,894		121,786,617
Total	553,304	$	78.11	513,394

During the first quarter of 2019, 39,910 shares were acquired from employees in connection with income tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock and acquired by the trustee of a trust established pursuant to the Bank of Hawaii Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DDCP”) directly from the Parent in satisfaction of the Company’s obligations to participants under the DDCP. The issuance of these shares was made in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) by Section 4(a)(2) thereof. The trustee under the trust and the participants under the DDCP are “Accredited Investors”, as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act. These transactions did not involve a public offering and occurred without general solicitation or advertising. The shares were purchased at the closing price of the Parent’s common stock on the dates of purchase.


²	The share repurchase program was first announced in July 2001. The program has no set expiration or termination date. The actual amount and timing of future share repurchases, if any, will depend on market and economic conditions, regulatory rules, applicable SEC rules, and various other factors.

Item 6. Exhibits

A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index and is incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Date:	April 22, 2019		Bank of Hawaii Corporation

		By:	/s/ Peter S. Ho
			Peter S. Ho
			Chairman of the Board,
			Chief Executive Officer, and
			President

		By:	/s/ Dean Y. Shigemura
			Dean Y. Shigemura
			Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index



Exhibit Number

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended, Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended, Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101	Interactive Data File