424B3
The
information in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not
complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus
supplement is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to
buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale
is not permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(B)(3)
Registration Statement No. 333-145055
Subject
To Completion: Dated September 12, 2007
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus Dated August 2,
2007
$
Schering-Plough
Corporation
% Senior Notes due 2017
% Senior Notes due 2037
Schering-Plough Corporation is offering
$ principal amount
of % Senior Notes due 2017
(the 2017 Notes) and
$ principal amount
of % Senior Notes due 2037 (the
2037 Notes and together with the 2017 Notes, the
Notes). The 2017 Notes will bear interest
at % per year and will mature
on , 2017. The 2037 Notes will bear
interest at % per year and will
mature
on ,
2037. Interest on each series of Notes is payable
on and of each
year, beginning on , 2008. The Notes will
be unsecured obligations and will rank equally with all of
Schering-Ploughs other unsecured and unsubordinated debt
from time to time outstanding. Schering-Plough may redeem the
Notes at any time at 100% of the principal amount plus a
make-whole premium. The Notes are not subject to any sinking
fund.
The Notes will be represented by one or more global securities
registered in the name of the nominee of The Depository
Trust Company (DTC). Beneficial interests in
the global securities will be shown on, and transfers will be
effected only through, records maintained by DTC and its
participants. Except as described below, Notes in definitive
form will not be issued. See Description of Notes.
See Risk Factors on page S-7 of this
prospectus supplement to read about factors you should consider
before buying the Notes.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities
or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
Note
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2037
Note
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial price to the public
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to
Schering-Plough
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The initial public offering price set forth above does not
include accrued interest, if any. Interest on the Notes will
accrue from , 2007 and
must be paid by purchasers if the Notes are delivered
after , 2007.
The underwriters expect to deliver the Notes through the
facilities of DTC against payment in New York, New York on or
about , 2007.
Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
Global Coordinator
|
|
|
BNP
PARIBAS |
Credit
Suisse |
JPMorgan |
Prospectus Supplement
dated ,
2007.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Prospectus Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
About this Prospectus Supplement
|
|
|
S-ii
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
S-ii
|
|
Exchange Rates
|
|
|
S-iii
|
|
Summary
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
S-17
|
|
Description of Notes
|
|
|
S-18
|
|
Certain United States Federal
Income Tax Consequences
|
|
|
S-27
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
Validity of Securities
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Experts
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
Incorporation of Information
Schering-Plough Files with the SEC
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
Planned Acquisition of Organon
BioSciences N.V.
|
|
|
S-37
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Statements
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
Prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
About This Prospectus
|
|
|
2
|
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
3
|
|
Incorporation of Information
Schering-Plough Files with the SEC
|
|
|
3
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
5
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
5
|
|
The Company
|
|
|
6
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and Preferred Stock Dividends
|
|
|
6
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
6
|
|
Description of Capital Stock
|
|
|
7
|
|
Description of Debt Securities
|
|
|
10
|
|
Validity of Securities
|
|
|
21
|
|
Experts
|
|
|
21
|
|
Index to OBS Group Combined
Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any
information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. You must
not rely on any unauthorized information or representations.
This prospectus supplement is an offer to sell only the Notes,
and only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is
lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus is current only as of
its date.
S-i
ABOUT
THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus
supplement, which describes the terms of this offering and also
adds to and updates information contained in the accompanying
prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this
prospectus supplement. The second part, the accompanying
prospectus, provides more general information, some of which may
not apply to this offering. You should read both this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, together with
additional information described below under the heading
Where You Can Find More Information.
If the information contained in this prospectus supplement
varies from that contained in the accompanying prospectus, you
should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement.
You should rely only on the information provided in or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus.
Schering-Plough
has not authorized anyone else to provide you with different
information.
Schering-Plough
is not making an offer of any securities in any state where the
offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the
information in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying
prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the
front cover of those documents and that any information
Schering-Plough
has incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date other
than the date of the document incorporated by reference or such
other date referred to in such document, regardless of the time
of delivery of this prospectus supplement or any sale or
issuance of a security.
Unless indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise requires,
references in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus to
Schering-Plough
Corporation,
Schering-Plough
and the company or similar terms are to
Schering-Plough
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless, in each
case, the context clearly indicates otherwise.
The trademarks indicated by CAPITAL LETTERS in this prospectus
supplement are the property of, licensed to, promoted or
distributed by
Schering-Plough
Corporation, its subsidiaries or related companies. The
trademarks indicated
by ®
in this prospectus supplement are the property of, licensed to,
promoted or distributed by Organon BioSciences N.V., its
subsidiaries or related companies.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus, the
documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus and other written
reports and oral statements
Schering-Plough
makes from time to time may contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate
to expectations or forecasts of future events.
Schering-Plough
uses words such as anticipate, believe,
could, estimate, expect,
forecast, project, intend,
plan, potential, will, and
other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a
discussion of potential future events, circumstances or future
operating or financial performance. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts.
In particular, forward-looking statements include statements
relating to future actions; ability to access the capital
markets; prospective products or product approvals; timing and
conditions of regulatory approvals; patent and other
intellectual property protection; future performance or results
of current and anticipated products; sales efforts; research and
development programs and anticipated spending; estimates of
rebates, discounts and returns; expenses and programs to reduce
expenses; the anticipated cost of and savings from reductions in
work force; the outcome of contingencies such as litigation and
investigations; growth strategy; expected synergies, cost
savings and acquisition
S-ii
costs related to the planned Organon BioSciences acquisition;
financial risks with respect to funding acquisitions; and
financial results.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and
uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on
circumstances that will occur in the future. Actual results may
vary materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements as a result of several factors, some of which are
more fully described in the Risk Factors section
beginning on
page S-7
of this prospectus supplement and in the reports to the
Securities and Exchange Commission incorporated by reference
into this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus,
and there are no guarantees about the financial and operational
performance or the performance of your investment.
Schering-Plough
does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking
statement for any reason.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
information concerning the noon buying rate for euro, expressed
in U.S. dollars per 1.00. The rates set forth below
are provided solely for your convenience and were not used in
the preparation of the Organon BioSciences combined financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the accompanying
prospectus or the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere
in this prospectus supplement. The noon buying rate
is the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in
foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Noon Buying
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
End
|
|
|
Average(1)
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1.3538
|
|
|
|
1.2478
|
|
|
|
1.3625
|
|
|
|
1.1801
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.1842
|
|
|
|
1.2400
|
|
|
|
1.3476
|
|
|
|
1.1667
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.3197
|
|
|
|
1.2665
|
|
|
|
1.3327
|
|
|
|
1.1860
|
|
2007 (through September 11,
2007)
|
|
|
1.3837
|
|
|
|
1.3448
|
|
|
|
1.3837
|
|
|
|
1.2904
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average of the noon buying rate
for euro on the last day of each full month during the relevant
year or period.
|
The noon buying rate for euro on September 11, 2007 was
$1.3837.
S-iii
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement, the
accompanying prospectus and in the documents incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information
that you should consider before buying these Notes. You should
read the entire prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus carefully, including the section titled Risk
Factors beginning on page S-7 of this prospectus
supplement and in the documents incorporated by reference in
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus,
before making an investment decision.
Schering-Plough
Corporation
Overview
Schering-Plough
is a global science-based company that discovers, develops and
manufactures pharmaceuticals for three customer
markets human prescription, consumer and animal
health. While most of the research and development activity is
directed toward prescription products, there are important
applications of this central research and development platform
into the consumer healthcare and animal health products.
Schering-Plough
also accesses external innovation via partnering, in-licensing
and acquisition for all three customer markets.
Strategy
Focused on Science
Earlier this decade,
Schering-Plough
experienced a number of business, regulatory, and legal
challenges. In April 2003, the Board of Directors named Fred
Hassan as the new Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of
Schering-Plough
Corporation. With support from the Board, he initiated a
strategic plan, with the goal of stabilizing, repairing and
turning around
Schering-Plough
in order to build long-term shareholder value. He also recruited
a new senior executive team. That strategic plan, the Action
Agenda, is a six- to eight-year, five-phase plan. In October
2006,
Schering-Plough
announced that it entered the fourth phase of the Action
Agenda Build the Base. During the Build the Base
phase,
Schering-Plough
continues to focus on its strategy of value creation across a
broad front, including:
|
|
|
|
|
growing the business;
|
|
|
|
penetrating new markets;
|
|
|
|
expanding the product portfolio for
Schering-Ploughs
three customer markets human pharmaceutical,
consumer healthcare and animal health; and
|
|
|
|
discovering and developing or acquiring new products.
|
As part of the Build the Base phase, in March 2007
Schering-Plough
announced its planned acquisition of Organon BioSciences N.V.,
referred to as Organon BioSciences or the OBS Group, for
approximately 11 billion in cash. This planned
acquisition further supports
Schering-Ploughs
value creation strategy.
A key component of the Action Agenda is applying science to meet
unmet medical needs. Research and development activities focus
on mechanisms to treat serious diseases. As a result, a core
strategy of
Schering-Plough
is to invest substantial funds in scientific research with the
goal of creating therapies and treatments that address important
unmet medical needs and also have commercial value. Consistent
with this core strategy,
Schering-Plough
has been increasing its investment in research and development.
Schering-Ploughs
progressing pipeline includes drug candidates across a wide
range of therapeutic areas with more than 20 compounds now
approaching or in Phase I development. As
Schering-Plough
continues to develop the later phase growth-drivers of
S-1
the pipeline (e.g., thrombin receptor antagonist, golimumab,
vicriviroc and HCV protease inhibitor), it anticipates higher
spending on clinical trial activities.
As part of the Action Agenda,
Schering-Plough
is enhancing infrastructure, upgrading processes and systems and
strengthening talent both the recruitment of
talented individuals and the development of key employees. While
these efforts are being implemented on a companywide basis,
Schering-Plough
is focusing especially on research and development to support
Schering-Ploughs
science-based business.
Schering-Ploughs
principal executive offices are located at 2000 Galloping Hill
Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, and
Schering-Ploughs
telephone number is
(908) 298-4000.
Schering-Plough
was incorporated in New Jersey in 1970.
Planned
Organon BioSciences Acquisition
On March 12, 2007,
Schering-Plough
announced that its board of directors approved the acquisition
of Organon BioSciences, the human and animal health care
businesses of Akzo Nobel N.V., referred to as Akzo Nobel, for
approximately 11 billion in cash.
Schering-Plough
believes the acquisition of Organon BioSciences will be a strong
fit strategically, scientifically and financially.
Organon BioSciences will provide
Schering-Plough
with a strong base of products and businesses. Organon
BioSciences pharmaceutical business, Organon, includes
leading products such as
Puregon®/Follistim®,
a follicle-stimulating hormone for infertility;
Esmeron®/Zemuron®,
a neuromuscular blocker used in surgical procedures; and
NuvaRing®
and
Implanon®
for contraception. In addition, Organon BioSciences animal
health business, Intervet, is one of the top three animal health
care companies globally, based on 2006 revenues, with products
treating a broad array of animals and disease states.
The acquisition is subject to certain closing conditions,
including regulatory approvals from the United States Federal
Trade Commission and the European Commission and completion of
customary consultation procedures with the Works Council of
Organon BioSciences in the Netherlands.
The Organon BioSciences acquisition which is expected to close
by the end of 2007, is anticipated to be accretive to
Schering-Ploughs
earnings per share in the first full year, excluding
purchase-accounting adjustments and acquisition-related costs.
Schering-Plough
expects to achieve annual synergies of approximately
$500 million, however, it is expected that it will take
three years from the closing of the acquisition to reach this
level of synergies.
Schering-Plough
will finance the Organon BioSciences acquisition through a mix
of cash, debt, and equity, including the net proceeds from this
offering. This offering is not conditioned upon the completion
of the Organon BioSciences acquisition. For more information on
the Organon BioSciences acquisition, see Planned
Acquisition of Organon BioSciences N.V. on
page S-37.
S-2
The
Offering
|
|
|
Notes |
|
$ aggregate principal amount
of % Senior Notes due 2017. |
|
|
|
$ aggregate principal amount
of % Senior Notes due 2037. |
|
Final Maturity Date |
|
, 2017, for the 2017
Notes. |
|
|
|
, 2037, for the 2037
Notes. |
|
Interest Payment Dates |
|
and of each
year, commencing , 2008. |
|
Ranking |
|
The Notes will be unsecured obligations of Schering-Plough and
will rank equally with all of its other senior unsecured and
unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The
Notes will be effectively subordinated to all of
Schering-Ploughs existing and future secured indebtedness
to the extent of the assets securing that indebtedness. The
Notes will also be effectively subordinated to all existing and
future liabilities of
Schering-Ploughs
subsidiaries. |
|
Further Issuances |
|
Schering-Plough may from time to time, without your consent,
increase the size of the issue of a series of Notes, or issue
additional debt securities that may be consolidated and form a
single series with the outstanding Notes of that series. See
Description of NotesPrincipal, Maturity and
Interest. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
Each series of Notes will be redeemable as a whole or in part,
at Schering-Ploughs option at any time, at a redemption
price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal
amount of the Notes and (2) the sum of the present values
of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest
thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of
redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semiannual
basis (assuming a
360-day year
consisting of twelve
30-day
months) at the Treasury Rate
plus basis points for the
2017 Notes or at the Treasury Rate
plus basis points for the 2037
Notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon
to the date of redemption. See Description of
NotesOptional Redemption. |
|
Mandatory Offer to Repurchase |
|
If a Change of Control Triggering Event occurs, Schering-Plough
must offer to repurchase the Notes at the redemption price set
forth under Description of NotesChange of Control
Triggering Event. |
|
Form and Denomination |
|
The Notes will be issued in fully registered form without
interest coupons in minimum denominations of $2,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof. See Description of
NotesPrincipal, Maturity and Interest. |
|
Clearance and Settlement |
|
The Notes will be issued in book-entry form through the
facilities of DTC for the accounts of its participants and will
trade in DTCs
same-day
funds settlement system. |
|
|
|
Beneficial interests in Notes held in book-entry form will not
be entitled to receive physical delivery of certificated notes, |
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
except in certain limited circumstances. For a description of
certain factors relating to clearance and settlement, see
Description of NotesBook-Entry System. |
|
Trustee, Registrar, Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent |
|
The Bank of New York. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
Schering-Plough
intends to use the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes to
fund a portion of the purchase price for the planned Organon
BioSciences acquisition. If the Organon BioSciences acquisition
is not completed,
Schering-Plough
will use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, and
Schering-Plough
will have broad discretion in allocating the net proceeds from
this offering. See Use of Proceeds. |
S-4
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary historical financial data have been
derived from
Schering-Ploughs
consolidated financial statements and should be read in
conjunction with
Schering-Ploughs
2006 10-K
and the second quarter 2007
10-Q, which
are incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.
Schering-Ploughs
unaudited financial information presented below for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 reflects all normal and
recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations and financial position. Results for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for
the
|
|
|
As of and for
the
|
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
per share data)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
|
$
|
5,369
|
|
|
$
|
10,594
|
|
|
$
|
9,508
|
|
|
$
|
8,272
|
|
Equity (income) from cholesterol
joint venture
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
(1,459
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
Income/(loss) before income
taxes(1)
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Net
income/(loss)(1)(2)
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
Net income/(loss)available to
common shareholders
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common
share(1)
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
Basic earnings/(loss) per common
share(1)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expenses
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
Financial Position and Cash
Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, net
|
|
$
|
4,395
|
|
|
$
|
4,396
|
|
|
$
|
4,365
|
|
|
$
|
4,487
|
|
|
$
|
4,593
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
17,061
|
|
|
|
15,367
|
|
|
|
16,071
|
|
|
|
15,469
|
|
|
|
15,911
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
8,870
|
|
|
|
7,968
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating results for the years
ended 2006, 2005 and 2004 include special charges and
manufacturing streamlining costs of $248 million,
$294 million and $153 million, respectively. Operating
results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
include special charges and manufacturing streamlining costs of
$12 million and $138 million, respectively. See
Note 2 to the
Schering-Plough
financial statements in the 2006
10-K
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement for
additional information on these charges that have been incurred
in 2006, 2005, and 2004. See also Note 2 to the
Schering-Plough
financial statements in the second quarter 2007
10-Q
incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement for
additional information on these charges that have been incurred
in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
(2) |
|
In 2004,
Schering-Plough
recorded the tax impact of the intended repatriation of funds
under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
|
S-5
RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
Schering-Ploughs
consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 through 2006 is set forth below. For the
purpose of computing these ratios, earnings consist
of income/(loss) before income taxes and equity income, plus
fixed charges (other than capitalized interest and preference
dividends), amortization of capitalized interest and distributed
income of equity investee; and fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends consist of interest expense, capitalized
interest, preference dividends and one-third of rentals, which
Schering-Plough
believes to be a reasonable estimate of an interest factor on
leases.
Schering-Plough
includes interest expense or interest income on unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of income tax expense. The ratio was
calculated by dividing the sum of the fixed charges into the sum
of the earnings before taxes and fixed charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)*
|
|
|
0.4
|
**
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2004, earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges and preferred stock dividends by $332 million.
|
|
**
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2003, earnings were insufficient to cover
fixed charges by $70 million.
|
S-6
Schering-Ploughs
business faces significant risks. Before you invest in the
Notes, you should carefully consider all of the information
included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus
supplement and in the accompanying prospectus. In addition, you
should carefully consider the following risks in addition to the
risks and uncertainties described in
Schering-Ploughs
reports to the SEC incorporated by reference into this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus as the
same may be updated from time to time.
Schering-Ploughs
future operating results and cash flows may differ materially
from the results described in the accompanying prospectus and
the documents incorporated by reference due to risks and
uncertainties related to
Schering-Ploughs
business, including those discussed below. In addition, these
factors represent risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those implied by
forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus and the documents
incorporated by reference.
Risks Related to
the Planned Organon BioSciences Acquisition
The acquisition of Organon BioSciences is subject to
certain closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, that
could delay or prevent the completion of the acquisition or
change the anticipated structure of the acquisition, which could
impact anticipated cost savings from synergies, projected
accretion to earnings from the transaction and results of future
operations.
The completion and structure of the Organon BioSciences
acquisition is subject to certain outside factors, including
regulatory approvals from the European Commission and the
Federal Trade Commission.
Schering-Plough
expects that the outcome of these proceedings will not impact
the anticipated synergies and earnings accretion that
Schering-Plough
currently expects to achieve upon the acquisition of Organon
BioSciences, the integration of the businesses of
Schering-Plough
and Organon BioSciences, or its plans to complete the
acquisition no later than the end of 2007. For example, one of
the possible outcomes is that
Schering-Plough
could be required to divest certain businesses or products;
however,
Schering-Plough
expects that all such divestitures in the aggregate will not be
material. Until all regulatory proceedings are concluded, there
are no assurances that the outcome of these proceedings will
occur in accordance with these expectations.
In addition, the failure to complete the acquisition as
currently contemplated could negatively affect
Schering-Ploughs
stock price, future business and results of operations.
In the event
that the Organon BioSciences acquisition does not close by
December 30, 2007,
Schering-Plough
could incur material damages.
Schering-Plough
currently anticipates that it will receive any necessary
regulatory approvals and satisfy other closing conditions in
sufficient time to close the acquisition of Organon BioSciences
on or before December 30, 2007, as required by the binding
offer from
Schering-Plough
to Akzo Nobel. However, were certain regulatory approvals not
obtained by that date as a result of a failure by
Schering-Plough
to use its reasonable best efforts and
Schering-Plough
does not close by that date, then
Schering-Plough
might be liable for damages relating to its breach of its
obligations to complete the transaction by December 30,
2007, and such damages could be material.
S-7
Schering-Plough
will face financial risks in funding the acquisition, which may
have a material impact on results of operations and cash
flows.
Schering-Plough
intends to fund the acquisition purchase price with a mix of
cash, the net proceeds from its offerings of common shares and
6.00% mandatory convertible preferred stock that closed on
August 15, 2007 and debt, including the net proceeds from
this offering.
Schering-Plough
has obtained a fully committed 11 billion bridge
facility to fund any portion of the acquisition cost that has
not been provided from the above sources by the acquisition
closing date. The bridge facility must be repaid within a year
of the acquisition closing date.
The ability to complete the anticipated issuances of debt
securities to fund the acquisition
and/or repay
the bridge facility, and the terms of the issuances, will depend
upon market conditions, and unfavorable conditions could
increase costs beyond what is anticipated. Such costs could have
a material adverse impact on cash flows or the results of
operations or both.
Further, the purchase price is significant and this use of funds
will impact the availability of cash flows from operations and
the capacity for future issuances of debt or equity or both, all
of which could reduce
Schering-Ploughs
flexibility to pursue future acquisitions and other
opportunities. In addition, higher debt levels may make
Schering-Plough
more vulnerable to general adverse economic conditions.
Because
Schering-Plough
is increasing its debt levels relating to the acquisition, its
credit ratings could decline below their current levels. The
impact of such decline could reduce the availability of
commercial paper borrowing and could increase the interest rate
on
Schering-Ploughs
short and long-term debt. Any such increase in cost would
negatively impact future cash flows and results of operations.
The
integration of the businesses of
Schering-Plough
and Organon BioSciences to create a combined company will be a
complex process, subject to unforeseen developments, which could
impact anticipated cost savings from synergies, expected
accretion to earnings and results of future
operations.
As the two companies are combined, the workforces of
Schering-Plough
and Organon BioSciences will face uncertainties in the interim
period from the closing date until the completion of the
integration phase. Although substantial efforts will be made to
complete the integration phase as quickly as possible, it is
difficult to predict how long the integration phase will last.
During the interim period from closing through completion of the
integration phase, the workforces of both companies may need to
learn to use new processes as work is integrated and
streamlined. Further, for those employees of the new combined
company who have not in the past worked for a
U.S.-based
global company, the applicable regulatory requirements are
different in a number of respects. While substantial efforts
will be made to facilitate smooth integration planning and
execution including thorough training and
transparent and motivational employee communications
there may be an increased risk of slower execution of various
work processes, repeated execution to achieve quality standards
and reputational harm in the event of a compliance failure with
new and complex regulatory requirements, even if such a failure
were inadvertent. Any such events could have an adverse impact
on anticipated cost savings from synergies, anticipated
accretion to earnings from the transaction and the results of
future operations.
Organon BioSciences currently is a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel, and
Akzo Nobel performs certain functions for Organon BioSciences
(including information technology, compensation, benefits and
other human resources functions). Akzo Nobel and Organon
BioSciences had made certain arrangements to separate those
functions prior to the time
Schering-Plough
and Akzo Nobel agreed that
Schering-Plough
would purchase Organon BioSciences. To date, however, the
separation has not been fully completed, and some separation
activities are continuing. As a result, Organon BioSciences and
Schering-Plough
will need to depend on certain services and cooperation from
Akzo
S-8
Nobel for some period after the acquisition closing date to
facilitate a smooth transition and complete separation.
Unforeseen delays or complications in the transition and
separation process or the lack of cooperation from Akzo Nobel
could increase integration costs.
Schering-Plough
has not completed an analysis of change of control or other
contractual provisions that may result from the Organon
BioSciences acquisition.
Certain of Organon BioSciences licenses and collaboration,
co-development,
co-marketing
and other agreements may have change of control provisions that
may be triggered by the acquisition. Should the final
negotiation of these matters result in a loss of rights under
these agreements, profits may be materially and adversely
affected.
The
acquisition of Organon BioSciences would increase the
concentration of
Schering-Ploughs
global operations, particularly in Europe, which would increase
the risk that negative events in Europe could have a negative
impact on future results of operations.
The acquisition of Organon BioSciences would further expand
Schering-Ploughs
global human pharmaceutical and animal health businesses,
particularly in Europe.
Schering-Plough
operates in more than 120 countries, and the majority of
Schering-Ploughs
profit and cash flow is generated from its
non-U.S. operations.
There are inherent risks in increasing the concentration in a
particular geographic area. These risks include currency
exchange rate volatility; increasing regulation of research and
development, product marketing, and product pricing; economic
destabilization; political instability or other disruption; or
war, terrorism, or a natural disaster that resulted in
disruption/destruction
in a geographic region where there are substantial business
operations. After the acquisition of Organon BioSciences
businesses,
Schering-Plough
would become more vulnerable to these adverse risks were such
events to occur in Europe.
The
acquisition of Organon BioSciences would expand
Schering-Ploughs
animal health business worldwide, which would increase the risk
that negative events in the animal health industry could have a
negative impact on future results of operations.
Through the acquisition of Organon BioSciences animal
health businesses,
Schering-Ploughs
global animal health business will become a more significant
business segment. The combined companys future sales of
key animal health products could be adversely impacted by a
number of factors including interruptions in manufacturing or
supply, new competitive developments to treat the same
conditions, technological advances, factors affecting production
or marketing costs, or pricing actions by one or more of
Schering-Ploughs
competitors. Further, the outbreak of disease carried by
animals, such as Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
(BSE) or mad cow disease, could lead to their
widespread death and precautionary destruction, which could
adversely impact
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations. As the animal health segment of
Schering-Ploughs
business becomes more significant, the impact of any such events
on future results of operations would also become more
significant.
Upon the
acquisition of Organon BioSciences,
Schering-Plough
would increase its biologics human and animal health product
offerings, including animal health vaccines. Biologics carry
unique risks and uncertainties, which could have a negative
impact on future results of operations.
The successful development, testing, manufacturing and
commercialization of biologics, particularly human and animal
health vaccines, is a long, expensive and uncertain process.
There are unique risks and uncertainties with biologics,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
There may be limited access to and supply of normal and diseased
tissue samples, cell lines, pathogens, bacteria, viral strains
and other biological materials. In addition, government
regulations in multiple jurisdictions such as the U.S. and
European states within the E.U., could result in restricted
access to, or transport or use of, such materials. If
Schering-Plough
loses access to sufficient sources of such materials, or if
tighter restrictions are imposed on the use
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
of such materials,
Schering-Plough
may not be able to conduct research activities as planned and
may incur additional development costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The development, manufacturing and marketing of biologics are
subject to regulation by the FDA, the European Medicines Agency
and other regulatory bodies. These regulations are often more
complex and extensive than the regulations applicable to other
pharmaceutical products. For example, in the U.S., a Biologics
License Application, including both preclinical and clinical
trial data and extensive data regarding the manufacturing
procedures, is required for vaccine candidates and FDA approval
for the release of each manufactured lot.
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing biologics, especially in large quantities, is
sometimes complex and may require the use of innovative
technologies to handle living micro-organisms. Manufacturing
biologics requires facilities specifically designed for and
validated for this purpose, and sophisticated quality assurance
and quality control procedures are necessary. Slight deviations
anywhere in the manufacturing process, including filling,
labeling, packaging, storage and shipping and quality control
and testing, may result in lot failures, product recalls or
spoilage.
|
|
|
|
Biologics are frequently costly to manufacture because the
ingredients are derived from living animal or plant material,
and most biologics cannot be made synthetically. In particular,
keeping up with the demand for vaccines may be difficult due to
the complexity of producing vaccines.
|
|
|
|
The use of biologically derived ingredients can lead to
allegations of harm, including infections or allergic reactions,
or closure of product facilities due to possible contamination.
Any of these events could result in substantial costs.
|
Upon the
acquisition of Organon BioSciences,
Schering-Plough
would acquire marketed products and pipeline projects in
therapeutic areas not currently covered by
Schering-Ploughs
existing marketed products portfolio and pipeline projects,
including womens health and fertility, anesthesia, and
neuroscience, each of which carry unique risks and uncertainties
which could have a negative impact on future combined results of
operations.
Organon BioSciences markets products in therapeutic areas that
are new to
Schering-Plough.
Each therapeutic area presents a different risk profile,
including different benefits and safety issues that must be
balanced by
Schering-Plough
and the regulators as various R&D and marketing decisions
are made; unique product liability risks; different patient and
prescriber priorities; and different societal pressures. While
adding new therapeutic areas may strengthen the business by
increasing sales and profits; making the combined company more
relevant to patients and prescribers; and diversifying
enterprise risk across more areas, such positives may not
outweigh the additional risk in a particular therapeutic area or
could result in unanticipated costs that could be material.
If the Organon
BioSciences acquisition does not close,
Schering-Plough
will have broad discretion to use the proceeds from this
offering.
Because the closing of the Organon BioSciences acquisition is
subject to a number of closing conditions as described above,
Schering-Plough
cannot assure you that the acquisition will close. If the
acquisition does not close, the Board of Directors will have
significant discretion to allocate the proceeds from this
offering to other uses.
Risks Related to
Schering-Plough
The risks and uncertainties described below related to
Schering-Ploughs
existing business will continue to apply to the combined company
after the closing of
Schering-Ploughs
planned acquisition of Organon BioSciences. References to
Schering-Plough
in this section refer to
Schering-Plough
before the closing of the acquisition and the combined company
from and after the closing of the acquisition.
S-10
Key
Schering-Plough
products generate a significant amount of
Schering-Ploughs
profits and cash flows, and any events that adversely affect the
market for its leading products could have a material and
negative impact on results of operations and cash
flows.
Schering-Ploughs
ability to generate profits and operating cash flow is largely
dependent upon the continued profitability of
Schering-Ploughs
cholesterol franchise, consisting of VYTORIN and ZETIA. In
addition, other key products such as REMICADE, NASONEX,
PEGINTRON, TEMODAR, CLARINEX, and AVELOX account for a material
portion of revenues. As a result of
Schering-Ploughs
dependence on key products, any events that adversely affect the
markets for these products could have a significant impact on
results of operations. These events include loss of patent
protection, increased costs associated with manufacturing, OTC
availability of
Schering-Ploughs
product or a competitive product, the discovery of previously
unknown side effects, increased competition from the
introduction of new, more effective treatments and
discontinuation or removal from the market of the product for
any reason.
For example, the profitability of
Schering-Ploughs
cholesterol franchise may be adversely affected by the
introduction of multiple generic forms in December 2006 of two
competing cholesterol products that lost patent protection
earlier in 2006.
There is a
high risk that funds invested in research will not generate
financial returns because the development of novel drugs
requires significant expenditures with a low probability of
success.
There is a high rate of failure inherent in the research to
develop new drugs to treat diseases. As a result, there is a
high risk that funds invested in research programs will not
generate financial returns. This risk profile is compounded by
the fact that this research has a long investment cycle. To
bring a pharmaceutical compound from the discovery phase to
market may take a decade or more and failure can occur at any
point in the process, including later in the process after
significant funds have been invested.
Schering-Ploughs
success is dependent on the development and marketing of new
products, and uncertainties in the regulatory and approval
process may result in the failure of products to reach the
market.
Products that appear promising in development may fail to reach
market for numerous reasons, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
findings of ineffectiveness, superior safety or efficacy of
competing products, or harmful side effects in clinical or
pre-clinical testing;
|
|
|
|
failure to receive the necessary regulatory approvals, including
delays in the approval of new products and new indications;
|
|
|
|
lack of economic feasibility due to manufacturing costs or other
factors; and
|
|
|
|
preclusion from commercialization by the proprietary rights of
others.
|
Intellectual
property protection for innovation is an important contributor
to
Schering-Ploughs
profitability. Generic forms of
Schering-Ploughs
products may be introduced to the market as a result of the
expiration of patents covering
Schering-Ploughs
products, a successful challenge to
Schering-Ploughs
patents, or the at-risk launch of a generic version of a
Schering-Plough
product, which may have a material and negative effect on
results of operations.
Intellectual property protection is critical to
Schering-Ploughs
ability to successfully commercialize its products. Upon the
expiration or the successful challenge of
Schering-Ploughs
patents covering a product, competitors may introduce
lower-priced generic versions of that product, which may include
Schering-Ploughs
well-established products. In recent years, some generic
manufacturers have launched generic versions of products before
the ultimate resolution of patent
S-11
litigation (commonly known as at-risk product
launches). Such generic competition could result in the loss of
a significant portion of sales or downward pressures on the
prices at which
Schering-Plough
offers formerly patented products, particularly in the U.S.
Patents and patent applications relating to
Schering-Ploughs
significant products are of material importance to
Schering-Plough.
Additionally, certain foreign governments have indicated that
compulsory licenses to patents may be granted in the case of
national emergencies, which could diminish or eliminate sales
and profits from those regions and negatively affect
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations. Further, recent court decisions relating
to other companies patents in the U.S., as well as the
discussion of regulatory initiatives, may result in further
erosion of intellectual property protection.
Patent
disputes can be costly to prosecute and defend and adverse
judgments could result in damage awards, increased royalties and
other similar payments and decreased sales.
Patent positions can be highly uncertain and patent disputes in
the pharmaceutical industry are not unusual. An adverse result
in a patent dispute involving
Schering-Ploughs
patents, or the patents of its collaborators, may lead to a loss
of market exclusivity and render such patents invalid. An
adverse result in a patent dispute involving patents held by a
third party may preclude the commercialization of
Schering-Ploughs
products, force
Schering-Plough
to obtain licenses in order to continue manufacturing or
marketing the affected products, which licenses may not be
available on commercially reasonable terms, negatively affect
sales of existing products or result in injunctive relief and
payment of financial remedies.
The potential for litigation regarding
Schering-Ploughs
intellectual property rights always exists and may be initiated
by third parties attempting to abridge
Schering-Ploughs
rights, as well as by
Schering-Plough
in protecting its rights. A generic manufacturer may file an
Abbreviated New Drug Application seeking approval after the
expiration of the applicable data exclusivity and alleging that
one or more of the patents listed in the innovators New
Drug Application are invalid or not infringed. This allegation
is commonly known as a Paragraph IV certification. The
innovator then has the ability to file suit against the generic
manufacturer to enforce its patents. In recent years, generic
manufacturers have used Paragraph IV certifications
extensively to challenge patents on a wide array of innovative
pharmaceuticals, and it is anticipated that this trend will
continue. Even if
Schering-Plough
is ultimately successful in a particular dispute,
Schering-Plough
may incur substantial costs in defending its patents and other
intellectual property rights. See Patent Challenges Under
the Hatch-Waxman Act in Part II, Item 1,
Legal Proceedings in the second quarter 2007
10-Q, for a
list of current Paragraph IV certifications for
Schering-Plough
products.
Multi-jurisdictional
regulations, including those establishing
Schering-Ploughs
ability to price products, may negatively affect
Schering-Ploughs
sales and profit margins.
Schering-Plough
faces increased pricing pressure globally from managed care
organizations, institutions and government agencies and programs
that could negatively affect
Schering-Ploughs
sales and profit margins. For example, in the U.S., the Medicare
Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
contains a prescription drug benefit for individuals who are
eligible for Medicare. The prescription drug benefit became
effective on January 1, 2006 and is resulting in increased
use of generics and increased purchasing power of those
negotiating on behalf of Medicare recipients.
In addition to legislation concerning price controls, other
trends that could affect
Schering-Ploughs
business include legislative or regulatory action relating to
pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement, health care reform
initiatives and drug importation legislation, involuntary
approval of medicines for OTC use, consolidation among customers
and trends toward managed care and health care costs
containment. Increasingly, market approval or reimbursement of
products may be impacted by health technology assessments, which
seek to condition approval or reimbursement on an assessment of
the impact of health technologies on the healthcare system.
S-12
In the U.S., as a result of the governments efforts to
reduce Medicaid expenses, managed care organizations continue to
grow in influence, and
Schering-Plough
faces increased pricing pressure as managed care organizations
continue to seek price discounts with respect to
Schering-Ploughs
products.
In other countries, many governmental agencies strictly control,
directly or indirectly, the prices at which pharmaceutical
products are sold. In these markets, cost control methods
including restrictions on physician prescription levels and
patient reimbursements; emphasis on greater use of generic
drugs; and across-the-board price cuts may decrease revenues
internationally.
Government
investigations against
Schering-Plough
could lead to the commencement of civil and/or criminal
proceedings involving the imposition of substantial fines,
penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies, including
exclusion from government reimbursement programs, which could
give rise to other investigations or litigation by government
entities or private parties.
Schering-Plough
cannot predict whether future or pending investigations to which
it may become subject would lead to a judgment or settlement
involving a significant monetary award or restrictions on its
operations.
The pricing, sales and marketing programs and arrangements, and
related business practices of
Schering-Plough
and other participants in the health care industry are under
increasing scrutiny from federal and state regulatory,
investigative, prosecutorial and administrative entities. These
entities include the Department of Justice and its
U.S. Attorneys Offices, the Office of Inspector
General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA,
the Federal Trade Commission and various state Attorneys General
offices. Many of the health care laws under which certain of
these governmental entities operate, including the federal and
state anti-kickback statutes and statutory and common law false
claims laws, have been construed broadly by the courts and
permit the government entities to exercise significant
discretion. In the event that any of those governmental entities
believes that wrongdoing has occurred, one or more of them could
institute civil or criminal proceedings which, if resolved
unfavorably, could subject
Schering-Plough
to substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative
remedies, including exclusion from government reimbursement
programs. In addition, an adverse outcome to a government
investigation could prompt other government entities to commence
investigations of
Schering-Plough
or cause those entities or private parties to bring civil claims
against it.
Schering-Plough
also cannot predict whether any investigations will affect its
marketing practices or sales. Any such result could have a
material adverse impact on
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, or its
business.
Regardless of the merits or outcomes of any investigations,
government investigations are costly, divert managements
attention from
Schering-Ploughs
business and may result in substantial damage to
Schering-Ploughs
reputation.
There are
other legal matters in which adverse outcomes could negatively
affect
Schering-Ploughs
business.
Unfavorable outcomes in other pending litigation matters, or in
future litigation, including litigation concerning product
pricing, securities law violations, product liability claims,
ERISA matters, patent and intellectual property disputes, and
antitrust matters could preclude the commercialization of
products, negatively affect the profitability of existing
products and could subject
Schering-Plough
to substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative
remedies, including exclusion from government reimbursement
programs. Any such result could materially and adversely affect
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, or its
business.
Please refer to Legal Proceedings in Item 3 in
Schering-Ploughs
2006 10-K
and Part II, Item 1 in
Schering-Ploughs
second quarter 2007 10-Q for descriptions of significant pending
litigation. For the combined company after the acquisition
closing date, see also Note 27 of Organon BioSciences
combined financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 and Note 17
S-13
to Organon BioSciences unaudited condensed combined
interim financial statements for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 included in the accompanying
prospectus.
Schering-Plough
is subject to governmental regulations, and the failure to
comply with, as well as the costs of compliance of, these
regulations may adversely affect
Schering-Ploughs
financial position and results of operations.
Schering-Ploughs
manufacturing facilities and clinical/research practices must
meet stringent regulatory standards and are subject to regular
inspections. The cost of regulatory compliance, including that
associated with compliance failures, can materially affect
Schering-Ploughs
financial position, cash flows and results of operations.
Failure to comply with regulations, which include
pharmacovigilance reporting requirements and standards relating
to clinical, laboratory and manufacturing practices, can result
in delays in the approval of drugs, seizure or recalls of drugs,
suspension or revocation of the authority necessary for the
production and sale of drugs, fines and other civil or criminal
sanctions.
For example, in May 2002,
Schering-Plough
agreed with the FDA to the entry of a Consent Decree to resolve
issues related to compliance with current Good Manufacturing
Practices at certain of
Schering-Ploughs
facilities in New Jersey and Puerto Rico. The Consent Decree
work placed significant additional controls on production and
release of products from these sites, which increased costs and
slowed production and led to a reduction in the number of
products produced at the sites. Further,
Schering-Ploughs
research and development operations were negatively impacted by
the Consent Decree because these operations share common
facilities with the manufacturing operations.
Schering-Plough
also is subject to other regulations, including environmental,
health and safety, and labor regulations.
Developments
following regulatory approval may decrease demand for
Schering-Ploughs
products.
Even after a product reaches market, certain developments
following regulatory approval, including results in
post-marketing Phase IV trials, may decrease demand for
Schering-Ploughs
products, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the re-review of products that are already marketed;
|
|
|
|
new scientific information and evolution of scientific theories;
|
|
|
|
the recall or loss of marketing approval of products that are
already marketed;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties concerning safety labeling changes; and
|
|
|
|
greater scrutiny in advertising and promotion.
|
In the past several years, clinical trials and post-marketing
surveillance of certain marketed drugs of competitors within the
industry have raised safety concerns that have led to recalls,
withdrawals or adverse labeling of marketed products. These
situations also have raised concerns among some prescribers and
patients relating to the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical
products in general, which have negatively affected the sales of
such products.
In addition, following the wake of recent product withdrawals of
other companies and other significant safety issues, health
authorities such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the
European Medicines Agency and the Pharmaceuticals and Medicines
Device Agency have increased their focus on safety when
assessing the benefit/risk balance of drugs. Some health
authorities appear to have become more cautious when making
decisions about approvability of new products or indications and
are re-reviewing select products that are already marketed,
adding further to the uncertainties in the regulatory processes.
There is also greater regulatory scrutiny, especially in the
U.S., on advertising and promotion and in particular,
direct-to-consumer advertising.
If previously unknown side effects are discovered or if there is
an increase in the prevalence of negative publicity regarding
known side effects of any of
Schering-Ploughs
products, it could
S-14
significantly reduce demand for the product or may require
Schering-Plough
to remove the product from the market. Further, in the current
environment in which all pharmaceutical companies operate,
Schering-Plough
is at risk for product liability claims for its products.
New products
and technological advances developed by
Schering-Ploughs
competitors may negatively affect sales.
Schering-Plough
operates in a highly competitive industry.
Schering-Plough
competes with a large number of multinational pharmaceutical
companies, biotechnology companies and generic pharmaceutical
companies. Many of
Schering-Ploughs
competitors have been conducting research and development in
areas served both by
Schering-Ploughs
current products and by those products
Schering-Plough
is in the process of developing. Competitive developments that
may impact
Schering-Plough
include technological advances by, patents granted to, and new
products developed by competitors or new and existing generic,
prescription
and/or OTC
products that compete with products of
Schering-Plough
or the
Merck/Schering-Plough
Cholesterol Partnership. In addition, it is possible that
doctors, patients and providers may favor those products offered
by competitors due to safety, efficacy, pricing or reimbursement
characteristics, and as a result
Schering-Plough
will be unable to maintain its sales for such products.
Competition
from third parties may make it difficult for
Schering-Plough
to acquire or license new products or product candidates
(regardless of stage of development) or to enter into such
transactions on terms that permit
Schering-Plough
to generate a positive financial impact.
Schering-Plough
depends on acquisition and in-licensing arrangements as a source
for new products. Opportunities for obtaining or licensing new
products are limited, however, and securing rights to them
typically requires substantial amounts of funding or substantial
resource commitments.
Schering-Plough
competes for these opportunities against many other companies
and third parties that have greater financial resources and
greater ability to make other resource commitments.
Schering-Plough
may not be able to acquire or license new products, which could
adversely impact
Schering-Plough
and its prospects.
Schering-Plough
may also have difficulty acquiring or licensing new products on
acceptable terms. To secure rights to new products,
Schering-Plough
may have to make substantial financial or other resource
commitments that could limit its ability to produce a positive
financial impact from such transactions.
Schering-Plough
relies on third-party relationships for its key products, and
the conduct and changing circumstances of such third parties may
adversely impact the business.
Schering-Plough
has several relationships with third parties on which
Schering-Plough
depends for many of its key products. Very often these third
parties compete with
Schering-Plough
or have interests that are not aligned with the interests of
Schering-Plough.
Notwithstanding any contracts
Schering-Plough
has with these third parties,
Schering-Plough
may not be able to control or influence the conduct of these
parties, or the circumstances that affect them, either of which
could adversely impact
Schering-Plough.
Schering-Ploughs
global operations expose
Schering-Plough
to additional risks, and any adverse event could have a material
negative impact on results of operations.
Schering-Plough
operates in more than 120 countries, and the majority of
Schering-Ploughs
profit and cash flow is generated from international operations.
Acquisitions, such as the recently announced purchase of Organon
BioSciences, would further expand the size, scale and scope of
its global operations. Risks, inherent in conducting a global
business include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in medical reimbursement policies and programs and
pricing restrictions in key markets;
|
|
|
|
multiple regulatory requirements that could restrict
Schering-Ploughs
ability to manufacture and sell its products in key markets;
|
S-15
|
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
|
diminished protection of intellectual property in some
countries; and
|
|
|
|
possible nationalization and expropriation.
|
In addition, there may be changes to
Schering-Ploughs
business and political position if there is instability,
disruption or destruction in a significant geographic region,
regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil
insurrection or social unrest; and natural or man-made
disasters, including famine, flood, fire, earthquake, storm or
disease.
Schering-Plough
is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in currency exchange
rates and interest rates.
Schering-Plough
operates in multiple jurisdictions and as such, virtually all
sales are denominated in currencies of the local jurisdiction.
Additionally,
Schering-Plough
has entered and will enter into acquisition, licensing,
borrowings or other financial transactions that may give rise to
currency and interest rate exposure. Since
Schering-Plough
cannot, with certainty, foresee and mitigate against such
adverse fluctuations, fluctuations in currency exchange rates
and interest rates could negatively affect
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations
and/or cash
flows.
In order to mitigate against the adverse impact of these market
fluctuations,
Schering-Plough
will from time to time enter into hedging agreements.
Schering-Plough
has entered into a foreign currency option to partially mitigate
the currency exchange rate risk on the euro purchase price of
the Organon BioSciences acquisition. In addition,
Schering-Plough
has entered into a series of interest rate swaps to partially
mitigate interest rate risk associated with financing the
purchase of Organon BioSciences. While hedging agreements, such
as currency options and interest rate swaps, limit some of the
exposure to exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations, such
attempts to mitigate these risks are costly and not always
successful.
Insurance
coverage for product liability may be limited, cost prohibitive
or unavailable.
Schering-Plough
maintains insurance coverage with such deductibles and
self-insurance to reflect market conditions (including cost and
availability) existing at the time it is written, and the
relationship of insurance coverage to self-insurance varies
accordingly. For certain products, third-party insurance may be
cost prohibitive, available on limited terms or unavailable.
Schering-Plough
is subject to evolving and complex tax laws, which may result in
additional liabilities that may affect results of
operations.
Schering-Plough
is subject to evolving and complex tax laws in its
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required for determining
Schering-Ploughs
tax liabilities, and
Schering-Ploughs
tax returns are periodically examined by various tax
authorities.
Schering-Ploughs
19972006
tax returns remain open for examination by the Internal Revenue
Service.
Schering-Plough
may be challenged by the IRS and other tax authorities on
positions it has taken in its income tax returns. Although
Schering-Plough
believes that its accrual for tax contingencies is adequate for
all open years, based on past experience, interpretations of tax
law, and judgments about potential actions by tax authorities,
due to the complexity of tax contingencies, the ultimate
resolution of any tax matters may result in payments greater or
less than amounts accrued.
In addition,
Schering-Plough
may be impacted by changes in tax laws including tax rate
changes, changes to the laws related to the remittance of
foreign earnings, new tax laws and revised tax law
interpretations in domestic and foreign jurisdictions.
S-16
Schering-Plough
estimates that the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes will
be approximately $ , after
deducting the underwriting discounts and estimated offering
expenses payable by
Schering-Plough.
Schering-Plough
intends to use the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes to
fund a portion of the approximately 11 billion
purchase price (or $15.2 billion based on the noon buying
rate for euro on September 11, 2007) for the planned
Organon BioSciences acquisition, which is expected to close by
the end of 2007.
Schering-Plough
intends to fund the remainder of the acquisition price through a
combination of cash on hand, the net proceeds from its recent
public offerings of common shares and 6.00% mandatory
convertible preferred stock and debt, which may include
borrowings under a committed 11 billion bridge
facility.
If the planned Organon BioSciences acquisition is not completed,
Schering-Plough
will use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, including:
|
|
|
|
|
to acquire additional marketed products and pipeline projects
(through acquisitions of companies or through product licenses
which may include royalties, license fees and milestone
payments),
|
|
|
|
research and development costs,
|
|
|
|
the repayment of debt,
|
|
|
|
litigation costs, and
|
|
|
|
other capital expenses and other operating expenses.
|
Schering-Plough
will invest the net proceeds from this offering in
U.S. dollar or foreign currency denominated short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade obligations and bank deposits
until they are applied as described above. If the planned
Organon BioSciences acquisition is not completed,
Schering-Plough
will have broad discretion in allocating the net proceeds from
this offering.
S-17
The Notes will be issued under an indenture between
Schering-Plough and The Bank of New York, as trustee, and as
supplemented by a supplemental indenture (which is collectively
referred to as the indenture). The following summary of the
material provisions of the indenture is qualified in its
entirety by the provisions of the indenture, including
definitions of certain terms used in the indenture. Wherever
Schering-Plough refers to particular sections or defined terms
of the indenture, those sections or defined terms are
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus. For additional information, you should
review the indenture that was filed as an exhibit to a
Form 8-K
with the SEC on November 28, 2003, and the supplemental
indenture that will be filed as an exhibit to a
Form 8-K.
The following description of the terms of the Notes supplements
and modifies the description of the general terms of the debt
securities set forth in the accompanying prospectus, which you
should read carefully.
Principal,
Maturity and Interest
The 2017 Notes will be initially limited to
$ in aggregate principal amount and the
2037 Notes will be initially limited to
$ in aggregate principal amount. The
2017 Notes will mature
on , 2017.
The 2037 Notes will mature on , 2037.
Schering-Plough will issue the Notes in denominations of $2,000
and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof.
Schering-Plough may, at any time, without the consent of the
holders of Notes of a series, issue additional Notes having the
same ranking and the same interest rate, maturity and other
terms as the Notes of the series (except for the payment of
interest accruing prior to the issue date of the additional
Notes or, in some cases, the first interest payment date
following the issue date of the additional Notes), and any such
additional Notes, together with the Notes of the relevant series
offered by this prospectus supplement, will form a single series
of the senior debt securities under the indenture.
The 2017 Notes will bear interest at the annual rate
of %. The 2037 Notes will bear interest
at the annual rate of %. Interest will accrue from
and including , 2007, and is payable
on and of each
year, commencing , 2008. Schering-Plough
will make each interest payment to the holders of record of
Notes at the close of business on
the and . If any
payment date for the Notes is not a business day,
Schering-Plough will make the payment on the next business day,
but Schering-Plough will not be liable for any additional
interest as a result of the delay in payment. Business
day means any Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or
Friday that is not a day when banking institutions in the place
of payment are authorized or obligated to be closed.
Interest will be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
comprised of twelve
30-day
months. The trustee, through its corporate trust office in the
Borough of Manhattan, City of New York (in such capacity, the
paying agent) will act as Schering-Ploughs
paying agent with respect to the Notes. Payments of principal,
interest and premium, if any, will be made by Schering-Plough
through the paying agent to DTC.
There is no public trading market for the Notes, and
Schering-Plough does not intend to apply for listing of the
Notes on any national securities exchange or for quotation of
the Notes on any automated dealer quotation system.
Ranking
The Notes constitute senior debt securities as described in the
accompanying prospectus. The Notes will be unsecured obligations
of Schering-Plough and will rank equally with all of its other
senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to
time outstanding. The Notes will be effectively subordinated to
all of Schering-Ploughs existing and future secured
indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing that
indebtedness.
S-18
Schering-Ploughs subsidiaries are separate and distinct
legal entities and have no obligation to pay the amounts that
will be due on the Notes or to make any funds available for
payment of amounts that will be due on the Notes.
Schering-Ploughs obligations under the Notes will be
effectively subordinated to all existing and future liabilities
of its subsidiaries. Therefore, Schering-Ploughs rights,
and the rights of its creditors, including the rights of the
holders of the Notes to participate in any distribution of
assets of any of Schering-Ploughs subsidiaries, if such
subsidiary were to be liquidated or reorganized, is subject to
the prior claims of the subsidiarys creditors.
Optional
Redemption
Each series of Notes will be redeemable as a whole or in part,
at Schering-Ploughs option at any time, at a redemption
price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal
amount of the Notes and (2) the sum of the present values
of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest
thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of
redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semiannual
basis (assuming a
360-day year
consisting of twelve
30-day
months) at the Treasury Rate plus basis points
for the 2017 Notes or at the Treasury Rate
plus basis points for the 2037
Notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon
to the date of redemption.
Treasury Rate means, with respect to any redemption
date, the rate per year equal to the semiannual equivalent yield
to maturity or interpolated (on a day count basis) of the
Comparable Treasury Issue, assuming a price for the Comparable
Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal
amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price for such
redemption date.
Comparable Treasury Issue means the United States
Treasury security or securities selected by an Independent
Investment Banker as having an actual or interpolated maturity
comparable to the remaining term of the Notes to be redeemed
that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in
accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new
issues of corporate debt securities of a comparable maturity to
the remaining term of the Notes.
Independent Investment Banker means one of the
Reference Treasury Dealers appointed by the trustee after
consultation with Schering-Plough.
Comparable Treasury Price means, with respect to any
redemption date, (A) the average of five Reference Treasury
Dealer Quotations for such redemption date, after excluding the
highest and lowest of such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations,
or (B) if the trustee obtains fewer than four such
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such
quotations.
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations means, with
respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any redemption
date, the average, as determined by the trustee, of the bid and
asked prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in
each case as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in
writing to the trustee by such Reference Treasury Dealer at
3:30 p.m. New York City time on the third business day
preceding such redemption date.
Reference Treasury Dealer means each of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. or their
affiliates plus one other dealer selected by Schering-Plough
that is a primary U.S. Government securities dealer, and
their respective successors; provided, however, that if any of
the foregoing or their affiliates shall cease to be a primary
U.S. Government securities dealer in The City of New York
(a Primary Treasury Dealer), Schering-Plough shall
substitute therefor another Primary Treasury Dealer.
Notice of any redemption will be mailed at least 30 days
but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to
each holder of Notes to be redeemed.
Unless Schering-Plough defaults in payment of the redemption
price, on and after the redemption date interest will cease to
accrue on the Notes or portions thereof called for redemption.
S-19
Sinking
Fund
The Notes will not be entitled to the benefit of a sinking fund.
Defeasance
The Notes are subject to the companys defeasance option.
See Description of SecuritiesDefeasance in the
accompanying prospectus.
Change of Control
Triggering Event
If a Change of Control Triggering Event occurs with respect to
any series of Notes, unless Schering-Plough has exercised its
right to redeem the Notes of that series as described above
under Optional Redemption, you will have the
right to require Schering-Plough to repurchase all or any part
(equal to $2,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000 in excess
thereof) of your Notes of that series pursuant to the offer
described below (the Change of Control Offer) on the
terms set forth in the indenture. In the Change of Control
Offer, Schering-Plough will offer payment in cash equal to 101%
of the aggregate principal amount of Notes repurchased plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes repurchased,
to the date of purchase (the Change of Control
Payment). Within 30 days following any Change of
Control Triggering Event, Schering-Plough will mail a notice to
you describing the transaction or transactions that constitute
the Change of Control Triggering Event and offering to
repurchase the Notes of the applicable series on the date
specified in the notice, which date will be no earlier than
30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such
notice is mailed (the Change of Control Payment
Date), pursuant to the procedures required by the
indenture and described in such notice. Schering-Plough will
comply with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and any other securities laws and
regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations
are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the Notes as
a result of a Change of Control Triggering Event. To the extent
that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations
conflict with the Change of Control Triggering Event provisions
of the indenture, Schering-Plough will comply with the
applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be
deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of
Control Triggering Event provisions of the indenture by virtue
of such conflicts.
On the Change of Control Payment Date, Schering-Plough will, to
the extent lawful:
|
|
|
|
|
accept for payment all Notes or portions of Notes properly
tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;
|
|
|
|
deposit with the paying agent an amount equal to the Change of
Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions of Notes
properly tendered; and
|
|
|
|
deliver or cause to be delivered to the trustee for cancellation
the Notes properly accepted together with an officers
certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of Notes or
portions of Notes being purchased by Schering-Plough.
|
For purposes of the foregoing discussion of a repurchase at the
option of holders upon the occurrence of a Change of Control
Triggering Event, the following definitions are applicable:
Below Investment Grade Rating Event
means the ratings on the applicable series of Notes are lowered
by each of the Rating Agencies and the Notes are rated below an
Investment Grade Rating by each of the Rating Agencies on any
date from the date of the public notice of an arrangement that
could result in a Change of Control until the end of the
60-day
period following public notice of the occurrence of the Change
of Control (which
60-day
period shall be extended so long as the rating of the applicable
series of Notes is under publicly announced consideration for
possible downgrade by any of the Rating Agencies); provided that
a Below Investment Grade Rating Event otherwise arising by
virtue of a particular reduction in rating shall not be deemed
to have occurred in respect of a particular Change of Control
(and thus shall not be deemed a Below Investment Grade Rating
Event
S-20
for purposes of the definition of Change of Control Triggering
Event hereunder) if the Rating Agencies making the reduction in
rating to which this definition would otherwise apply do not
announce or publicly confirm or inform the Trustee or
Schering-Plough in writing at its or Schering-Ploughs
request that the reduction was the result, in whole or in part,
of any event or circumstance comprised of or arising as a result
of, or in respect of, the applicable Change of Control (whether
or not the applicable Change of Control shall have occurred at
the time of the Below Investment Grade Rating Event).
Capital Stock of any Person means any
and all shares, interests, rights to purchase, warrants,
options, participation or other equivalents of or interests in
(however designated) equity of such Person, including any
preferred stock and limited liability or partnership interests
(whether general or limited), but excluding any debt securities
convertible into such equity.
Change of Control means the occurrence
of any of the following: (1) the direct or indirect sale,
transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of
merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related
transactions, of all or substantially all of
Schering-Ploughs properties or assets and of
Schering-Ploughs subsidiaries properties or assets
taken as a whole to any Person or group of related
persons (as that term is used in
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) (a Group)
other than Schering-Plough or one of its subsidiaries;
(2) the adoption of a plan relating to
Schering-Ploughs liquidation or dissolution; (3) the
consummation of any transaction (including, without limitation,
any merger or consolidation) the result of which is that any
Person or Group becomes the beneficial owner, directly or
indirectly, of more than 50% of the then outstanding number of
shares of
Schering-Ploughs
Voting Stock; or (4) the first day on which a majority of
the members of Schering-Ploughs board of directors are not
Continuing Directors.
Change of Control Triggering Event
means the occurrence of both a Change of Control and a Below
Investment Grade Rating Event.
Continuing Director means, as of any
date of determination, any member of Schering-Ploughs
board of directors who (1) was a member of
Schering-Ploughs board of directors on the date of the
issuance of the Notes; or (2) was nominated for election or
elected to Schering-Ploughs board of directors with the
approval of a majority of the Continuing Directors who were
members of Schering-Ploughs board of directors at the time
of such nomination or election (either by a specific vote or by
approval of Schering-Ploughs proxy statement in which such
member was named as a nominee for election as a director).
Fitch means Fitch Ratings.
Investment Grade Rating means a rating
equal to or higher than BBB- (or the equivalent) by Fitch, Baa3
(or the equivalent) by Moodys and BBB- (or the equivalent)
by S&P.
Moodys means Moodys
Investors Service, Inc.
Person means any individual,
corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint
stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, limited
liability company, government or any agency or political
subdivision thereof or any other entity, and includes a
person as used in Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act.
Rating Agencies means (1) each of
Fitch, Moodys and S&P; and (2) if any of Fitch,
Moodys or S&P ceases to rate the Notes or fails to
make a rating of the Notes publicly available for reasons
outside of Schering-Ploughs control, a nationally
recognized statistical rating organization within the
meaning of
Rule 15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F)
under the Exchange Act, selected by Schering-Plough (as
certified by a resolution of Schering-Ploughs board of
directors) as a replacement agency for Fitch, Moodys or
S&P, or all of them, as the case may be.
S&P means Standard &
Poors Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.
Voting Stock of a Person means all
classes of Capital Stock of such Person then outstanding and
normally entitled to vote in the election of directors, managers
or trustees, as applicable.
S-21
Schering-Ploughs ability to repurchase its Notes pursuant
to a Change of Control Offer may be limited by its then-existing
financial resources. Even if sufficient funds were otherwise
available, the terms of future senior credit facilities and
other indebtedness may prohibit Schering-Ploughs
prepayment of the Notes before the scheduled maturity of the
Notes.
Certain
Covenants
Consolidation,
Merger or Sale
Under the indenture, Schering-Plough has agreed not to
consolidate with or merge into any other corporation or convey
or transfer or lease substantially all of its properties and
assets to any person, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the person is a corporation or limited liability company
organized and validly existing under the laws of the United
States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
the successor corporation expressly assumes by a supplemental
indenture the due and punctual payment of the principal of and
any premium or any interest on all the debt securities and the
performance of every covenant in the indenture that
Schering-Plough would otherwise have to perform as if it were an
original party to the indenture;
|
|
|
|
immediately after giving effect to the consolidation, merger,
conveyance, transfer or lease, no default or event of default
shall have occurred and be continuing; and
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough delivers to the trustee an officers
certificate and an opinion of counsel, each stating that the
consolidation, merger, conveyance, transfer or lease and the
supplemental indenture comply with these provisions.
|
The successor corporation will assume all of
Schering-Ploughs obligations under the indenture as if it
were an original party to the indenture. After assuming the
obligations, the successor corporation will have all of
Schering-Ploughs rights and powers under the indenture.
Limitations on
Liens
Subject to the exceptions described below and those described
under the section of this prospectus supplement captioned
Exempted Indebtedness below, Schering-Plough
may not, and may not permit any restricted subsidiary to, create
any lien on any principal property or shares of capital stock of
any restricted subsidiary without equally and ratably securing
the debt securities. This restriction will not apply to
permitted liens, including:
|
|
|
|
|
liens on principal property existing at the time of its
acquisition or to secure the payment of all or part of the
purchase price;
|
|
|
|
with respect to any series of debt securities, any lien existing
on the date of issuance of the debt securities;
|
|
|
|
liens on property or shares of capital stock, or securing
indebtedness, of any corporation existing at the time the
corporation becomes a restricted subsidiary or is merged into
Schering-Plough or into a restricted subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
liens which secure debt of a restricted security that is owed to
Schering-Plough or to another subsidiary or
Schering-Ploughs debt that is owed to a restricted
subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
liens in connection with the issuance of certain tax-exempt
industrial development or pollution control bonds or other
similar bonds;
|
|
|
|
liens in favor of any customer arising in respect of payments
made by or on behalf of a customer for goods produced for, or
services rendered to, customers in the ordinary course of
business not exceeding the amount of those payments;
|
S-22
|
|
|
|
|
any extension, renewal or replacement of any lien referred to in
any of the previous paragraphs; and
|
|
|
|
statutory liens, liens for taxes or assessments or governmental
charges or levies not yet due or delinquent or which can be paid
without penalty or are being contested in good faith,
landlords liens on leased property, easements and other
liens of a similar nature as those described above.
|
Limitation on
Sale and Leaseback Transactions
Subject to the exceptions described below and those described
under the section of this prospectus supplement captioned
Exempted Indebtedness, sale and leaseback
transactions by Schering-Plough or any restricted subsidiary of
any principal property are prohibited under capital leases
(except for leases for a term, including any renewal thereof, of
not more than three years and except for leases between
Schering-Plough and a subsidiary or between subsidiaries) unless:
|
|
|
|
|
after giving effect to the application of proceeds from the sale
and leaseback transaction, Schering-Plough or the restricted
subsidiary could incur a mortgage on the property under the
restrictions described above under the section of this
prospectus supplement captioned Limitations on
Liens in an amount equal to the attributable debt with
respect to the sale and leaseback transaction without equally
and ratably securing the debt securities; or
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough, within 120 days after the sale or transfer
by Schering-Plough or any restricted subsidiary, apply to the
retirement of Schering-Ploughs funded debt (which is
defined as indebtedness for borrowed money having a maturity of,
or by its terms extendible or renewable for, a period of more
than 12 months after the date of determination of the
amount) an amount equal to the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
the net proceeds of the sale of the principal domestic property
sold and leased under such arrangement; or
|
|
|
(2)
|
the fair market value of the principal domestic property sold
and leased, subject to credits for certain voluntary retirements
of funded debt.
|
Exempted
Indebtedness
Schering-Plough or any restricted subsidiary may create or
assume liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions not
otherwise permitted under the provisions regarding limitations
on liens and sale and leaseback transactions described above, so
long as at that time and immediately after giving effect to the
lien or sale and leaseback transaction, the sum of
Schering-Ploughs and its consolidated subsidiaries
aggregate outstanding indebtedness incurred after the date of
the indenture and secured by the liens relating to principal
properties, that are not otherwise permitted, plus that related
to sale and leaseback transactions, that are not otherwise
permitted, does not exceed 10% of consolidated net tangible
assets.
Certain
Definitions
The following are the meanings of terms that are important in
understanding the covenants previously described:
|
|
|
|
|
attributable debt means the present
value (discounted at a specified rate each year to be determined
by Schering-Plough to be appropriate and consistent with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles) of the
obligations for rental payments required to be paid during the
remaining term of any lease of more than 12 months.
|
|
|
|
consolidated net tangible assets means
the total assets of Schering-Plough and its consolidated
subsidiaries as shown on or reflected in our most recent
quarterly or annual, as applicable, balance sheet, less
(1) all current liabilities, excluding current liabilities
which could
|
S-23
|
|
|
|
|
be classified as long-term debt under U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and current liabilities which are
by their terms extendible or renewable at the obligors
option to a time more than 12 months after the time as of
which the amount of current liabilities is being computed;
(2) advances to entities accounted for on the equity method
of accounting; and (3) intangible assets. In this context,
intangible assets means the aggregate value, net of
any applicable reserves, as shown on or reflected in
Schering-Ploughs balance sheet, of (a) all trade
names, trademarks, licenses, patents, copyrights and goodwill;
(b) organizational and development costs; (c) deferred
charges, other than prepaid items such as insurance, taxes,
interest, commissions, rents and similar items and tangible
assets being amortized; and (d) unamortized debt discount
and expense, less unamortized premium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
principal property means any
manufacturing facility having a gross book value in excess of 1%
of consolidated net tangible assets that Schering-Plough or any
restricted subsidiary owns and located within the United States,
excluding its territories and possessions and Puerto Rico, other
than any facility or portion of a facility which
Schering-Ploughs board of directors reasonably determines
is not material to the business conducted by Schering-Plough and
its subsidiaries as a whole.
|
|
|
|
restricted subsidiary means any
subsidiary (1) of which substantially all of the property
of is located, and substantially all of the business is carried
on, within the United States, excluding its territories and
possessions and Puerto Rico; and (2) which owns or operates
one or more principal properties (however, restricted
subsidiary does not include subsidiaries primarily engaged
in the business of a finance or insurance company and their
branches).
|
|
|
|
subsidiary means each corporation of
which more than 50% of the outstanding voting stock is owned,
directly or indirectly, by Schering-Plough or one or more of its
subsidiaries.
|
Book-Entry
System
DTC will act as securities depository for the Notes. One or more
fully-registered note certificates will be issued for the Notes,
in the aggregate principal amount of such issue, and will be
deposited with DTC.
DTC has informed Schering-Plough that DTC is:
|
|
|
|
|
a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York
Banking Law;
|
|
|
|
a banking organization within the meaning of the New
York Banking Law;
|
|
|
|
a member of the Federal Reserve System;
|
|
|
|
a clearing corporation within the meaning of the New
York Uniform Commercial Code; and
|
|
|
|
a clearing agency registered pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
|
DTC holds securities that its participants (Direct Participants)
deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the settlement among
Direct Participants of securities transactions, such as
transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through
electronic computerized book-entry changes in Direct
Participants accounts, which eliminates the need for
physical movement of securities certificates. Direct
Participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks,
trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other
organizations. DTC is owned by a number of its Direct
Participants and by The New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the
American Stock Exchange LLC, and the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. Access to the DTC system is also
available to others such as securities brokers and dealers,
banks, and trust companies that clear through or maintain a
custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either
directly or indirectly (Indirect Participants). The rules
applicable to DTC and its Direct and Indirect Participants are
on file with the SEC.
S-24
Purchases of Notes under the DTC system must be made by or
through Direct Participants, which receive a credit for the
Notes on DTCs records. The ownership interest of each
actual purchaser of each note (Beneficial Owner) is in turn to
be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants
records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written
confirmations from DTC of their purchase, but Beneficial Owners
are expected to receive written confirmations providing details
of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their
holdings, from the Direct Participant or Indirect Participant
through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction.
Transfers of ownership interests in the Notes are to be
accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct Participants
and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners.
Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing
their ownership interests in Notes except in the event that use
of the book-entry system for the Notes is discontinued. As a
result, the ability of a person having a beneficial interest in
the Notes to pledge such interest to persons or entities that do
not participate in the DTC system, or to otherwise take actions
with respect to such interest, may be affected by the lack of a
physical certificate evidencing such interest. In addition, the
laws of some states require that certain persons take physical
delivery in definitive form of securities that they own and that
security interests in negotiable instruments can only be
perfected by delivery of certificates representing the
instruments. Consequently, the ability to transfer Notes
evidenced by the global Notes will be limited to such extent.
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Notes deposited by
Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of
DTCs partnership nominee, Cede & Co. or such
other name as may be requested by an authorized representative
of DTC. The deposit of Notes with DTC and their registration in
the name of Cede & Co. or such other nominee do not
effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge
of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Notes; DTCs records
reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose
accounts such Notes are credited, which may or may not be the
Beneficial Owners. The Direct Participants and Indirect
Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of
their holdings on behalf of their customers.
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct
Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants,
and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to
Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them,
subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in
effect from time to time.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor such other DTC
nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the Notes. Under
its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the issuer
as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy
assigns Cede & Co.s consenting or voting rights
to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Notes are
credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to
the Omnibus Proxy).
Payments of principal, interest and premium, if any, on the
Notes will be made by Schering-Plough to the trustee and from
the trustee to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as
may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC.
DTCs practice is to credit Direct Participants
accounts, upon DTCs receipt of funds and corresponding
detail information from Schering-Plough or the trustee on the
payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown
on DTCs records. Payments by Direct Participants and
Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by
standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case
with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer
form or registered in street name and will be the
responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, the trustee
or Schering-Plough, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of
principal, premium (if any) or interest to Cede & Co.
(or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized
representative of DTC) is Schering-Ploughs responsibility
or the trustees, and disbursement of such payments to
Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and
disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be
the responsibility of Direct Participants and Indirect
Participants.
Although DTC has agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to
facilitate transfers of securities among Participants of DTC, it
is under no obligation to perform or continue to perform such
S-25
procedures, and DTC may discontinue providing its services as
securities depository with respect to the Notes at any time by
giving reasonable notice to Schering-Plough. Under such
circumstances, in the event that a successor securities
depository is not obtained, note certificates are required to be
printed and delivered. In addition, note certificates will be
printed and delivered if Schering-Plough decides to discontinue
use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (a
successor securities depository) or if an event of default
occurs with respect to the Notes and has not been cured or
waived. In that event, note certificates will be printed and
delivered. See Description of Debt SecuritiesGlobal
Securities in the accompanying prospectus.
Neither Schering-Plough nor the trustee will have any
responsibility or obligation to participants in the DTC system
or the persons for whom they act as nominees with respect to the
accuracy of the records of DTC, its nominee or any Direct
Participant or Indirect Participant with respect to any
ownership interest in the Notes, or with respect to payments to
or providing of notice for the Direct Participants, the Indirect
Participants or the beneficial owners of the Notes.
The information in this section concerning DTC and DTCs
book-entry system has been obtained from sources that
Schering-Plough believes to be reliable. None of
Schering-Plough, the trustee, the underwriters, dealers or
agents are responsible for the accuracy or completeness of this
information.
S-26
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income
tax consequences relevant to the purchase, ownership, and
disposition of the Notes. The following summary is based upon
current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, referred to as the Code, Treasury Regulations and
judicial and administrative authority, all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect. State, local and
foreign tax consequences are not summarized, nor are tax
consequences to special classes of investors including, but not
limited to, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, banks
or other financial institutions, partnerships or other entities
classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, dealers in securities, persons liable for the
alternative minimum tax, traders in securities that elect to use
a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities
holdings, and persons that will hold the Notes as a position in
a hedging transaction, straddle, conversion
transaction or other risk reduction transaction. Tax
consequences may vary depending upon the particular status of an
investor. The summary is limited to taxpayers who will hold the
Notes as capital assets (generally, held for
investment) and who purchase the Notes in the initial offering
at the initial offering price. Each potential investor should
consult with its own tax adviser as to the federal, state,
local, foreign and any other tax consequences of the purchase,
ownership, and disposition of the Notes.
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes holds the Notes, the U.S. federal
income tax treatment of the partnership and its partners will
generally depend on the status of the partners and the
activities of the partnership and its partners. A partner in a
partnership holding the Notes should consult its own tax advisor
with regard to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an
investment therein.
U.S.
Holders
The discussion in this section is addressed to a holder of the
Notes that is a U.S. holder for federal income
tax purposes. You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial
owner of the Notes that is for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (i) a citizen or individual resident of the United
States; (ii) a corporation created or organized in the
United States or under the laws of the United States or of any
State (or the District of Columbia); (iii) an estate whose
income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless
of its source; or (iv) a trust if (x) a United States
court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts
administration and one or more United States persons are
authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or
(y) the trust has validly elected to be treated as a
U.S. domestic trust.
Payments of
Interest
Interest on the Notes is taxable to a U.S. holder as
ordinary interest income at the time it is received or accrued,
depending on the U.S. holders method of accounting
for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Dispositions
A U.S. holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss
on a sale or exchange of the Notes equal to the difference
between the amount realized (less any accrued interest not
previously included in the U.S. holders income, which
will be taxable as ordinary income) upon the sale or exchange
and the U.S. holders adjusted tax basis in the Notes
sold or exchanged. Such capital gain or loss will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the U.S. holders holding
period for the Notes sold or exchanged is more than one year.
Long-term capital gains of noncorporate taxpayers are generally
taxed at a lower maximum marginal tax rate than the maximum
marginal tax rate applicable to ordinary income. The
deductibility of net capital losses by individuals and
corporations is subject to limitations.
S-27
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding on U.S. Holders
Certain U.S. holders may be subject to backup withholding
with respect to the payment of interest on the Notes and to
certain payments of proceeds on the sale or redemption of the
Notes unless such U.S. holders provide proof of an
applicable exemption or a correct taxpayer identification
number, and otherwise comply with applicable requirements of the
backup withholding rules.
Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules from a
payment to a U.S. holder is allowable as a credit against
such U.S. holders U.S. federal income tax, which
may entitle the U.S. holder to a refund, provided that the
U.S. holder timely provides the required information to the
IRS. Moreover, certain penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a
U.S. holder who is required to furnish information but does
not do so in the proper manner. U.S. holders are urged to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of
backup withholding in their particular circumstances and the
availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from
backup withholding under current Treasury Regulations.
Non-U.S.
Holders
The discussion in this section is addressed to holders of the
Notes that are
non-U.S. holders.
You are a
non-U.S. holder
if you are not a U.S. holder or an entity treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Payments of
Interest
No withholding of U.S. federal income tax will apply to a
payment of interest on a Note to a
non-U.S. holder
under the Portfolio Interest Exemption, provided
that:
|
|
|
|
|
such payment is not effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States (or, if
certain income tax treaties apply, such payment is not
attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States);
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
does not actually or constructively own 10 percent or more
of the total combined voting power of all classes of
Schering-Plough stock entitled to vote;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is not a controlled foreign corporation that is related directly
or constructively to Schering-Plough through stock ownership;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is not a bank that acquired the Notes in consideration for an
extension of credit made pursuant to a loan agreement entered
into in the ordinary course of its trade or business; and
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
provides the withholding agent, in accordance with specified
procedures, with a statement to the effect that such holder is
not a U.S. person (generally through the provision of a
properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
or other applicable form).
|
If a
non-U.S. holder
cannot satisfy the requirements of the Portfolio Interest
Exemption described above, interest paid to a
non-U.S. holder
with respect to the Notes will be subject to a 30%
U.S. withholding tax, or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable income tax treaty, unless the
interest is (i) effectively connected with a trade or
business carried on by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and the
non-U.S. holder
provides the payor with a
Form W-8ECI
(or other applicable form)) and (ii) if an income tax
treaty applies, attributable to a U.S. permanent
establishment or, in the case of an individual, a fixed base
maintained by the
non-U.S. holder.
Interest effectively connected with such trade or business, and,
if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to such permanent
establishment, will generally be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on a net basis at applicable individual or corporate
rates. A
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may be subject to a branch profits
tax at a 30% rate (or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty) on the deemed repatriation
from the United States of its
S-28
effectively connected earnings and profits, subject
to certain adjustments. Under applicable Treasury Regulations, a
non-U.S. holder
(including, in certain cases of
non-U.S. holders
that are entities, the owner or owners of such entities) will be
required to satisfy certain certification requirements in order
to claim a reduced rate of withholding pursuant to an applicable
income tax treaty.
Dispositions
A
non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or
withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or exchange of the
Notes so long as:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business of the
non-U.S. holder
(or, if a tax treaty applies, the gain is not attributable to a
U.S. permanent establishment or, in the case of an
individual, a fixed base maintained by such
non-U.S. holder); and
|
|
|
|
in the case of a non-resident alien individual, such
non-U.S. holder
is not present in the United States for 183 or more days in the
taxable year of the sale or disposition and certain other
conditions are met.
|
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding on
Non-U.S.
Holders
Payment of interest, and the tax withheld with respect thereto,
is subject to information reporting requirements. These
information reporting requirements apply regardless of whether
withholding was reduced or eliminated by an applicable income
tax treaty or withholding was not required because the interest
was effectively connected with a trade or business in the United
States conducted by the
non-U.S. holder.
Copies of the information returns reporting such interest and
withholding may also be made available under the provisions of
an applicable income tax treaty or agreement to the tax
authorities in the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides. U.S. backup withholding will generally apply on
payments of interest to a
non-U.S. holder
unless such
non-U.S. holder
furnishes to the payor a
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form), or otherwise establishes an
exemption.
Payment by a U.S. office of a broker of the proceeds of a
sale of the Notes is subject to both backup withholding and
information reporting unless the
non-U.S. holder,
or beneficial owner thereof, as applicable, certifies that it is
a
non-U.S. holder
on
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form), or otherwise establishes an
exemption. Subject to exceptions, backup withholding and
information reporting generally will not apply to a payment of
proceeds from the sale of the Notes if such sale is effected
through a foreign office of a broker.
Non-U.S. holders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the
application of backup withholding in their particular
circumstances and the availability of and procedure for
obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under current
Treasury Regulations.
S-29
Schering-Plough and the underwriters for the offering named
below have entered into an underwriting agreement with respect
to the Notes being offered. Subject to certain conditions, each
underwriter has severally agreed to purchase the principal
amount of each series of Notes indicated in the following table.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. is acting as global coordinator,
and BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. are acting as joint
bookrunners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Principal Amount
|
Underwriters
|
|
of
2017 Notes
|
|
of
2037 Notes
|
|
Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the
Notes being offered, if any are taken.
Notes sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the initial public offering prices set forth on the
cover of this prospectus supplement. Any Notes sold by the
underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount
from the initial public offering prices of up
to % of the principal
amount of the 2017 Notes and up
to % of the principal
amount of the 2037 Notes. Any such securities dealers may resell
any Notes purchased from the underwriters to certain other
brokers or dealers at a discount from the initial public
offering prices of up
to % of the principal
amount of the 2017 Notes and up
to % of the principal
amount of the 2037 Notes. If all the Notes are not sold at the
initial offering price, the underwriters may change the offering
price and the other selling terms. The offering of the Notes by
the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance and
subject to the underwriters right to reject any order in
whole or in part.
The Notes are a new issue of securities with no established
trading market. Schering-Plough has been advised by the
underwriters that the underwriters intend to make a market in
the Notes but are not obligated to do so and may discontinue
market making at any time without notice. No assurance can be
given as to the liquidity of the trading market for the Notes.
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell Notes in the open market. These transactions may
include short sales, stabilizing transactions and purchases to
cover positions created by short sales. Short sales involve the
sale by the underwriters of a greater number of Notes than they
are required to purchase in the offering. Stabilizing
transactions consist of certain bids or purchases made for the
purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price
of the Notes while the offering is in progress.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased Notes sold by or for the
account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
These activities by the underwriters, as well as other purchases
by the underwriters for their own accounts, may stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the Notes. As a
result, the price of the Notes may be higher than the price that
otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities
are commenced, they may be discontinued by the underwriters at
any time. These transactions may be effected in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Schering-Plough estimates that its share of the total expenses
of the offering, excluding underwriting discounts and
commissions, will be approximately $1,000,000.
S-30
Schering-Plough has agreed to indemnify the several underwriters
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act of 1933.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. is currently acting as financial
advisor to Schering-Plough, for which they are paid usual and
customary fees. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. is the syndication
agent under Schering-Ploughs $2 billion credit
agreement entered into on August 9, 2007. Certain of the
other underwriters or their affiliates are also lenders under
the credit agreement. Additionally, Goldman, Sachs &
Co., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., or their
respective affiliates, have committed to act as lenders under
Schering-Ploughs 11 billion bridge facility.
In addition, the underwriters and their affiliates have, from
time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various
financial advisory, commercial banking, investment banking or
underwriting services for Schering-Plough, its subsidiaries or
its affiliates for which they received or will receive customary
fees and expenses.
The Notes will be offered in the United States through the
underwriters either directly or through their respective
U.S. broker-dealer affiliates or agents.
European Economic
Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that
with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the
Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make
an offer of Notes which are the subject of the offering
contemplated by this Prospectus to the public in that Relevant
Member State other than:
(a) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive)
subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives
for any such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of notes to the public in relation to any
notes in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form by any means of sufficient information on the terms of
the offer and the Notes to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the Notes, as the
same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
Belgium
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that it will not
sell the Notes to any person qualifying as a consumer within the
meaning of Article 1.7° of the Belgian law of
14 July 1991 on consumer protection and trade practices
unless such sale is made in compliance with this law and its
implementing regulation.
S-31
United
Kingdom
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 2000 (the FSMA)) received by it in
connection with the issue or sale of the Notes in circumstances
in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the
Issuer; and
(b) it has complied and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the Notes in, from or otherwise involving the United
Kingdom.
Ireland
Each underwriter has agreed that:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
it will not underwrite the issue of, or place the Notes,
otherwise than in conformity with the provisions of the Irish
Investment Intermediaries Act 1995 as amended, including,
without limitation, Sections 9 and 23 thereof and any codes
of conduct rules made under Section 37 thereof and the
provisions of the Investor Compensation Act 1998; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
it will not underwrite the issue of, or place, the Notes,
otherwise than in conformity with the provisions of the Irish
Central Bank Acts
1942-1999,
as amended, and any codes of conduct rules made under
Section 117(1) thereof; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
it will not underwrite the issue of, place or otherwise act in
Ireland in respect of the Notes, otherwise than in conformity
with the provisions of the Irish Market Abuse (Directive
2003/6/EC) Regulations 2005 and any rules issued by the
Financial Regulator pursuant thereto.
|
Italy
The offering of the Notes has not been registered with CONSOB
(the Italian Securities Exchange Commission) pursuant to Italian
securities legislation and, accordingly, no Notes may be
offered, sold or delivered, nor may copies of this document or
of any other document relating to the Notes be distributed in
the Republic of Italy except: (i) to qualified investors
(investitori qualificati), as defined in Article 100 of
Legislative Decree No. 58 of 24 February 1998, as
amended and Article 31, second paragraph of CONSOB
Regulation No. 11522 of 1 July 1998, as amended;
and (ii) in circumstances which are exempt from public
offer rules pursuant to Article 100 of Legislative Decree
no. 58 of 24 February 1998, as amended (the
Financial Services Act) and Article 33, first
paragraph, of CONSOB Regulation No. 11971 of
14 May 1999, as amended. Any offer, sale or delivery of the
Notes or distribution of copies of this document or any other
document relating to the Notes in the Republic of Italy under
(i) or (ii) above must be: (a) made by an
investment firm, bank or financial intermediary permitted to
conduct such activities in the Republic of Italy in accordance
with the Financial Services Act and Legislative Decree
No. 385 of 1 September 1993, as amended (the
Banking Act); (b) in compliance with
Article 129 of the Banking Act and the implementing
guidelines of the Bank of Italy, as amended from time to time,
pursuant to which the Bank of Italy may request information on
the issue or the offer of securities in the Republic of Italy;
and (c) in compliance with any other applicable laws and
regulations.
Please note that in accordance with
Article 100-bis
of the Financial Services Act, where no exemption from the rules
on solicitation of investments applies under (i) and
(ii) above, the subsequent distribution of the Notes on the
secondary market in Italy must be made in compliance with the
public offer and the prospectus requirement rules provided under
the Financial Services Act and Regulation No. 11971.
Failure to comply with such rules may result in the sale of such
Notes being declared null and void and in the liability of the
intermediary transferring the financial instruments for any
damages suffered by the investors.
S-32
France
This document is not being distributed in the context of a
public offering in France within the meaning of
Article L.411-1
of the Code monétaire et financier, and has
therefore not been submitted to the Autorité des
Marchés Financiers for prior approval and clearance
procedure.
Each of the underwriters represents and agrees that it has not
offered or sold and will not offer or sell, directly or
indirectly, the Notes to the public in France, and has not
distributed or caused to be distributed and will not distribute,
or cause to be distributed to the public in France, this
prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and any other
document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or
invitation or subscription or purchase, of the Notes, and that
such offers, sales and distributions have been and will be made
in France only to (a) providers of investment services
relating to portfolio management for the account of third
parties,
and/or
(b) qualified investors (investisseurs
qualifiés) acting for their own account (other than
individuals), all as defined in, and in accordance with,
Articles L.
411-1, L.
411-2 and D.
411-1 of the
French Code monétaire et financier.
The Notes may be resold directly or indirectly only in
compliance with Articles L.
411-1, L.
411-2, L.
412-1 and L.
621-8 to L.
621-8-3 of
the French Code monétaire et financier.
Sweden
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that when an offer
of notes to the public is made in Sweden, the guidelines
enumerated for the European Economic Area apply, except that,
with respect to paragraph (b), offers may only be made to legal
entities who, for each of the last two financial years,
fulfilled at least two of the following conditions: (1) an
average of at least 250 employees, (2) a total balance
sheet of more than 43,000,000 and (3) a net turnover
of more than 50,000,000, as shown in its profit and loss
account.
Switzerland
No public solicitation of investors or other offering or
advertising activities in respect of the Notes can be carried
out in Switzerland. The Notes may only be offered by way of
private placement to banks, securities dealers or other
regulated entities, to institutional investors with a
professional treasury management, or to a limited number of
other investors not exceeding 20.
Hong
Kong
The Notes may not be offered or sold by means of any document
other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute an
offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement,
invitation or document relating to the Notes may be issued or
may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue
(in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is
directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed
or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do
so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to Notes
which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons
outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors
within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.
571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Japan
The securities have not been and will not be registered under
the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the Securities and
Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed that it will not
offer or sell any securities, directly or indirectly, in Japan
or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan
S-33
(which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan,
including any corporation or other entity organized under the
laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly
or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan, except
pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of,
and otherwise in compliance with, the Securities and Exchange
Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial
guidelines of Japan.
Singapore
Each underwriter has acknowledged that this prospectus has not
been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of
Singapore. Accordingly, the underwriters have represented and
agreed that they have not offered or sold any Notes or caused
the Notes to be made the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase and will not offer or sell the Notes or
cause the Notes to be made the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase, and have not circulated or
distributed, nor will they circulate or distribute, this
prospectus or any other document or material in connection with
the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase,
of the Notes, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in
Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under
Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act,
Chapter 289 of Singapore (the SFA),
(ii) to a relevant person pursuant to Section 275(1),
or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in
accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275, of
the SFA or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance
with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the
SFA.
Allen & Overy LLP, New York, New York and McCarter &
English LLP are passing upon the validity of the Notes for
Schering-Plough.
In addition, Susan Ellen Wolf, Esq., the Corporate Secretary, is
passing upon certain matters related to this offering.
Ms. Wolf is an officer of
Schering-Plough
and beneficially owns common shares and holds options to
purchase additional common shares. Ms. Wolf is eligible to
participate in the
Schering-Plough
Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Schering-Plough
Employees Saving Plan and may receive benefits under those
plans. Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York,
New York, is passing upon certain legal matters for the
underwriters.
The consolidated financial statements, the related financial
statement schedule, and managements report on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
incorporated in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus by reference from
Schering-Ploughs
2006 10-K
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference (which
reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule and include an explanatory paragraph regarding
Schering-Ploughs
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, and SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans; (2) express an
unqualified opinion on managements assessment regarding
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting;
and (3) express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting), and have been so
incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given
upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
With respect to the unaudited interim financial information for
the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and
June 30, 2007 and 2006, which is incorporated herein by
reference, Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, have applied
limited procedures in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for a
review of such information. However, as stated in their reports
included in
Schering-Ploughs
first and second quarter
2007 10-Q,
and incorporated by reference herein, they did not audit and
they do not express an opinion on that interim financial
information. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on their
reports on such information should be restricted in light of the
limited
S-34
nature of the review procedures applied. Deloitte &
Touche LLP are not subject to the liability provisions of
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for their reports
on the unaudited interim financial information because those
reports are not reports or a part of the
registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities
Act.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Schering-Plough
files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. You may read and copy any document
Schering-Plough
files at the SECs public reference room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. In
addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports,
proxy statements and other information that
Schering-Plough
electronically files. The address of the SECs website is
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also inspect
Schering-Ploughs
SEC reports and other information at the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10005.
INCORPORATION
OF INFORMATION SCHERING-PLOUGH FILES WITH THE SEC
The SEC allows
Schering-Plough
to incorporate by reference the information it files with them,
which means:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporated documents are considered part of this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents; and
|
|
|
|
information that
Schering-Plough
files with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this
incorporated information.
|
Schering-Plough
incorporates by reference the documents listed below, which were
filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, referred to as the Exchange Act, (excluding any
portions of such documents that have been furnished
but not filed for purposes of the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
its
2006 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its first quarter
2007 10-Q
filed with the SEC on April 27, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its second quarter
2007 10-Q
filed with the SEC on July 27, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 29, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 16, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 19, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 28, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 11, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 23, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K filed with the SEC on August 13, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2007;
|
|
|
|
the following sections of its Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Schedule 14A filed with
the SEC on April 20, 2007: Proposal One: Elect
Eleven Directors for a One-Year Term,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance, Information About the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors and its Practices, Committees
of the Board of Directors, Executive
Compensation, Director Compensation,
Stock Ownership, Certain Transactions,
Procedures for Related Party Transactions and Director
Independence
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
Assessments, Director Independence, and
Proposal Two: Ratify the Designation of
Deloitte & Touche LLP to Audit
Schering-Ploughs
Books and Accounts for 2007; and
|
Schering-Plough
also incorporates by reference each of the following documents
that
Schering-Plough
will file with the SEC after the date of this prospectus
(excluding any portions of such documents that have been
furnished but not filed for purposes of
the Exchange Act) until the offering of the Notes pursuant to
this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is
complete:
|
|
|
|
|
reports filed under Section 13(a) and (c) of the
Exchange Act;
|
|
|
|
definitive proxy or information statements filed under
Section 14 of the Exchange Act in connection with any
subsequent stockholders meeting; and
|
|
|
|
any reports filed under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|
Schering-Plough
does not incorporate by reference any information furnished
under items 2.02 or 7.01 (or corresponding information
furnished under item 9.01 or included as an exhibit) in any
past or current
Form 8-K
filing (unless otherwise indicated).
You may request a copy of any filings referred to above
(excluding exhibits not specifically incorporated by reference
into the filing), at no cost, by contacting
Schering-Plough
in writing or by telephone
(908-298-7436)
at the following address: Investor Relations,
Schering-Plough
Corporation, 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033.
Documents may also be available on
Schering-Ploughs
website at http://www.schering-plough.com. Please note
that all references to
http://www.schering-plough.com in this
prospectus supplement are inactive textual references only and
that the information contained on
Schering-Ploughs
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement or the accompanying prospectus, or intended to be
used in connection with the offering of the Notes.
S-36
PLANNED
ACQUISITION OF ORGANON BIOSCIENCES N.V.
On March 12, 2007,
Schering-Plough
announced that its board of directors approved the acquisition
of Organon BioSciences, the human and animal health care
businesses of Akzo Nobel, for approximately
11 billion in cash ($15.2 billion based on the
noon buying rate for euro on September 11, 2007).
Schering-Plough
believes the acquisition of Organon BioSciences will be a strong
fit strategically, scientifically and financially.
Organon BioSciences will provide
Schering-Plough
with a strong base of products and businesses. Organon
BioSciences pharmaceutical business, Organon, includes
leading products such as
Puregon®/Follistim®,
a follicle-stimulating hormone for infertility;
Esmeron®/Zemuron®,
a neuromuscular blocker used in surgical procedures;
NuvaRing®,
Implanon®,
Marvelon/Desogen®
and
Mercilon®/Mirecette®
for contraception;
Livial®
for menopause/osteoporosis;
Ovestin®
for menopause-related symptoms; and
Remeron®
and
Tolvon®
for depression.
In addition to the currently marketed products, Organon
currently has five compounds in Phase III development, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Asenapine, a psychopharmacologic agent for the treatment of
patients with schizophrenia and acute mania bipolar disorder;
|
|
|
|
Sugammadex, for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced
during surgical procedures;
|
|
|
|
NOMAC/E2, an oral contraceptive product containing nomegestrol
acetate, a novel progesterone, and estriadiol, a natural
estrogen;
|
|
|
|
ORG36286, a long-acting recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone
for infertility; and
|
|
|
|
Esmirtazapine (ORG50081), for the treatment of insomnia and
potentially for hot flashes in menopausal women.
|
Organon BioSciences animal health business, Intervet, is
one of the top three animal health care companies globally,
based on 2006 revenues. The Intervet business has a strong
science base. Intervets products treat a broad array of
animals and disease states. Intervets products include
Nobivac®,
a range of canine vaccines;
Panacur®,
a de-wormer;
Bovilis®,
a bovine biological for disease control and eradication; and
Nobilis®,
a poultry vaccine to keep flocks free from infectious disease.
The transaction, which is expected to close by the end of 2007,
is anticipated to be accretive to
Schering-Ploughs
earnings per share in the first full year, excluding
purchase-accounting adjustments and acquisition-related costs.
Schering-Plough expects to achieve annual synergies of
approximately $500 million, however, it is expected that it
will take three years from the closing of the acquisition to
reach this level of synergies.
Schering-Plough
will finance the Organon BioSciences acquisition through a mix
of cash, debt, and equity, including the net proceeds from this
offering.
Schering-Plough
also has a committed 11 billion bridge facility. Any
borrowings under the bridge facility may remain outstanding for
up to one year following closing.
Schering-Plough
and Akzo Nobel have entered into a binding offer letter and have
agreed to execute a fully negotiated share purchase agreement
upon completion of customary consultation procedures involving
the Works Council of Organon BioSciences in the Netherlands. The
acquisition is also subject to certain closing conditions,
including regulatory approvals from the United States Federal
Trade Commission and the European Commission.
Under Dutch law, Organon BioSciences is required to seek the
advice of its Works Council regarding the planned acquisition by
Schering-Plough. The Works Council issued its initial advice on
July 27, 2007 and such advice was positive, subject to
various conditions. With the satisfactory conclusion of
subsequent discussions among Organon BioSciences, the Works
Council and Schering-Plough, and the expiration of a mandatory
waiting period, the Works Council has declined to take any
formal action relating to the transaction. As a result, the
requirements of Dutch law relating to the
S-37
completion of the consultation procedures with the Organon
BioSciences Works Council have been met and the corresponding
condition to the transaction proceeding has been satisfied.
Schering-Plough
has completed customary due diligence, however,
Schering-Ploughs
access to some information during that process was limited
because of antitrust regulations. Until
Schering-Plough
consummates the acquisition,
Schering-Plough
will not have complete access to information about Organon
BioSciences. Further, because Organon BioSciences is not itself
a public company, but part of the Akzo Nobel family of
companies, public information about Organon BioSciences is
limited. For historical financial information about Organon
BioSciences, see Organon BioSciences combined
financial statements in the accompanying prospectus.
S-38
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet and unaudited pro forma condensed statements of combined
operations as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and for the year ended December 31, 2006 have been prepared
on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, referred to as
U.S. GAAP, and applicable requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements are derived by applying pro forma
adjustments to the combined historical financial statements of
Schering-Plough
and Organon BioSciences N.V., referred to as Organon BioSciences
or the OBS Group, as the case may be, and which comprise the
human and animal health businesses of Akzo Nobel N.V. Organon
BioSciences historical audited combined financial
statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,
and the historical unaudited condensed combined interim
financial statements as of and for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, each of which have been prepared
under International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by
the European Union, referred to as IFRS, appear on pages F-1 to
F-104 in the accompanying prospectus. The unaudited pro forma
condensed statements of combined operations give effect to the
following transactions as if such transactions had occurred on
January 1, 2006. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
balance sheet gives effect to the following transactions as if
such transactions had occurred on June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
The planned acquisition by
Schering-Plough
of Organon BioSciences, referred to as the Organon BioSciences
acquisition, for aggregate cash consideration of approximately
$14.79 billion (approximately 11.00 billion).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financing of the Organon BioSciences acquisition with
aggregate proceeds of $9.79 billion from the following
financing transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 10,000,000 shares of 6.00% mandatory
convertible preferred stock, referred to as the 2007 Preferred
Stock, for net proceeds of $2.44 billion in August 2007;
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 57,500,000 common shares for net proceeds of
$1.54 billion in August 2007; and
|
|
|
|
Issuance of the Notes and draw down of debt under a committed
bridge facility for aggregate net proceeds of $5.81 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of existing
Schering-Plough
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of
$5.00 billion to fund the purchase price.
|
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information,
preliminary estimates and certain assumptions that
Schering-Plough
believes are reasonable based on information currently
available, and are described in the accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. The
unaudited pro forma condensed statements of combined operations
should not be considered indicative of actual results that would
have been achieved had the Organon BioSciences acquisition been
consummated on the dates indicated and does not purport to
indicate results of operations as of any future date or for any
future period.
The acquisition of Organon BioSciences is currently under
regulatory review, and a share purchase agreement has not been
executed between Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough.
Further,
Schering-Plough
has not completed an analysis of change of control or other
contractual provisions that may result from the acquisition. As
a result, pro forma adjustments related to the following matters
have not been included in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of business or product divestitures required to
obtain regulatory clearance. Currently such divestitures are not
expected to be material in the aggregate.
|
|
|
|
The effects of change of control or other contractual
provisions. Should the final negotiation of these matters result
in a loss of rights under these contracts, profits may be
materially and adversely affected.
|
P-1
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
In addition, final agreements have not been reached on the
transfer of Organon BioSciences pension and other
post-employment and post-retirement assets and liabilities from
Akzo-Nobel to
Schering-Plough.
As a result, these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements reflect a reasonable allocation of such
assets and liabilities and related expense amounts made by
Organon BioSciences management as described in
Note 21 to the Organon BioSciences combined financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 included in the accompanying prospectus. Such allocations
may not be indicative of the actual separation of the pension
and other post-employment and post-retirement assets and
liabilities.
The Organon BioSciences acquisition will be accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting in conformity with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141, Business Combinations as issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the
U.S. Under this method, the purchase price and transaction
related costs will be allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of
the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired (including
identifiable intangible assets) will be allocated to goodwill.
In connection with the preliminary purchase price allocation,
Schering-Plough
has made estimates of the fair values of assets and liabilities
based upon assumptions that
Schering-Plough
believes are reasonable. The allocation of purchase price for
acquisitions requires use of accounting estimates and judgments
to allocate the purchase price to the identifiable tangible
and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their respective fair values.
Schering-Ploughs
process for estimating the fair values of in-process research
and development, identifiable intangible assets and certain
tangible assets requires significant estimates and assumptions
including, but not limited to, determining the timing and
estimated costs to complete the in-process projects, projecting
regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows and
developing appropriate discount rates.
The allocation of purchase price is subject to finalization of
Schering-Ploughs
analysis of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. The final
allocation of the purchase price may result in additional
adjustments to the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities
and may also result in adjustments to depreciation, amortization
and in-process research and development. These adjustments could
result in material increases or decreases to net income
available to common shareholders. Further revisions to the
purchase price allocation will be made as additional information
becomes available.
Accordingly, the purchase price allocation in the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements is preliminary and
will be adjusted upon completion of the final valuation. Such
adjustments could be material. The final valuation is expected
to be completed as soon as practicable but no later than
12 months after the consummation of the Organon BioSciences
acquisition.
The U.S. GAAP historical Organon BioSciences amounts
included in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet as of June 30, 2007 and the unaudited pro forma
condensed statement of combined operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 are derived from the Organon
BioSciences unaudited IFRS condensed combined interim
balance sheet and statement of income presented in Euro as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 converted to
U.S. GAAP and translated to U.S. Dollars. The
U.S. GAAP historical Organon BioSciences amounts included
in the unaudited pro forma condensed statement of combined
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 are derived
from the Organon BioSciences audited IFRS statement of
income presented in Euro for the year ended December 31,
2006 converted to U.S. GAAP and translated to
U.S. Dollars.
A reconciliation of Organon BioSciences combined net
income and combined invested equity between U.S. GAAP and
IFRS as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 have
been included
P-2
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
as Note 32 to the Organon BioSciences historical audited
combined financial statements included in the accompanying
prospectus.
A reconciliation of Organon BioSciences unaudited combined
net income and combined invested equity between U.S. GAAP and
IFRS as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 has
been included as Note 21 to the Organon BioSciences
historical unaudited condensed combined interim financial
statements included in the accompanying prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are presented for informational purposes only. They do not
purport to present what
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations or financial condition would have been had
these transactions actually occurred on the dates indicated, nor
do they purport to represent
Schering-Ploughs
results of operations for any future period or financial
condition for any future date. Furthermore, no effect has been
given in the unaudited pro forma condensed statements of
combined operations for synergistic benefits that may be
realized through the combination of
Schering-Plough
and Organon BioSciences or the costs that have been or may be
incurred in integrating their operations.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
should be read in conjunction with
Schering-Ploughs
historical consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in
Schering-Ploughs
2006 10-K
and second quarter 2007
10-Q, which
are incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement,
and Organon BioSciences historical audited combined
financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006 and historical unaudited condensed
combined interim financial statements as of June 30, 2007
and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
included in the accompanying prospectus.
P-3
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2007
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organon
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Schering-
|
|
BioSciences
|
|
(See Note
3)
|
|
Condensed
|
|
|
Plough
|
|
(See Note
2)
|
|
Financing
|
|
Purchase
Accounting
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments
|
|
$
|
6,234
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
9,792
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
(14,792
|
)(b)
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
Receivables from related parties,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745
|
(d)
|
|
|
3,648
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
11,303
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
9,792
|
|
|
|
(14,556
|
)
|
|
|
9,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
(e)
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,633
|
(f)
|
|
|
4,383
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,337
|
(g)
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)(h)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
17,061
|
|
|
$
|
5,678
|
|
|
$
|
9,792
|
|
|
$
|
(4,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,334
|
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,151
|
|
Payables to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,570
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
U.S., foreign and state income taxes
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,178
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
(i)
|
|
|
2,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
5,813
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,303
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
(j)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
4,264
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
12,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory convertible preferred
shares
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243
|
|
Invested equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)(k)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)(h)
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
Treasury shares
|
|
|
(5,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
8,870
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
3,979
|
|
|
|
(5,388
|
)
|
|
|
9,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
17,061
|
|
|
$
|
5,678
|
|
|
$
|
9,792
|
|
|
$
|
(4,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P-4
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMBINED
OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
Historical
|
|
(See Note
3)
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Schering
|
|
Organon
BioSciences
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Condensed
|
|
|
Plough
|
|
(See
Note 2)
|
|
Financing
|
|
Accounting
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,913
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
(l)
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
Other (income)/expense, net
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
292
|
(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Special and acquisition related
charges
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Equity income
|
|
|
(978
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
(o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
(307
|
)
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
(p)
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
(p)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
P-5
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMBINED OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organon
|
|
(See Note
3)
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Schering
|
|
BioSciences
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Condensed
|
|
|
Plough
|
|
(See
Note 2)
|
|
Financing
|
|
Accounting
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
10,594
|
|
|
$
|
4,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,237
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
3,697
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
(l)
|
|
|
5,685
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,412
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
Other (income)/expense, net
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
583
|
(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
Special and acquisition related
charges
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Equity income
|
|
|
(1,459
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit)
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
(o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
(613
|
)
|
|
$
|
(490
|
)
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to common
shareholders before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
(p)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings available to common
shareholders before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
(p)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
P-6
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
THE PLANNED ORGANON BIOSCIENCES ACQUISITION AND BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
On March 12, 2007,
Schering-Plough
announced its plan to acquire Organon BioSciences for
approximately 11.00 billion in cash. The transaction
is subject to certain closing conditions, including regulatory
approvals, and is expected to close by the end of 2007.
The Organon BioSciences acquisition will be accounted for in
accordance with U.S. GAAP using the purchase method of
accounting. Under this method, the purchase price and
transaction related costs are allocated to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as
of the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over
the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired (including
identifiable intangible assets) is allocated to goodwill.
This allocation of the purchase price is subject to finalization
of
Schering-Ploughs
analysis of the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the Organon BioSciences acquisition
date. The final allocation of the purchase price may result in
additional adjustments to the recorded amounts of assets and
liabilities and may also result in adjustments to depreciation,
amortization and in-process research and development. The
adjustments arising out of the finalization of the purchase
price allocation will not impact cash flows. However, such
adjustments could result in material increases or decreases to
net income available to common shareholders. Further revisions
to the purchase price allocation will be made as additional
information becomes available.
Accordingly, the purchase price allocation in the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements is preliminary and
will be adjusted upon completion of the final valuation. Such
adjustments could be material. The final valuation is expected
to be completed as soon as practicable but no later than
12 months after the consummation of the Organon BioSciences
acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet gives
effect to the Organon BioSciences acquisition and related
financing as if it had occurred on June 30, 2007. The
historical unaudited condensed combined balance sheet for
Organon BioSciences at June 30, 2007, prepared in
accordance with IFRS and presented in Euro, has been converted
to U.S. GAAP and has been translated to U.S. Dollars
using a rate of $1.35, which approximates the Euro conversion
rate to U.S. Dollars at June 30, 2007. The unaudited
pro forma condensed statement of combined operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006, gives effect to the Organon BioSciences
acquisition and related financing as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2006. The historical combined statement of
income for Organon BioSciences for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and the twelve months ended December 31,
2006, prepared in accordance with IFRS and presented in Euro,
have been converted to U.S. GAAP and have been translated
to U.S. Dollars using exchange rates of $1.33 and $1.25,
respectively, which approximates the average Euro conversion
rate to U.S. Dollars for the applicable period.
The estimated purchase price was calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions,
except exchange rate)
|
|
|
Consideration in Euro
|
|
|
11,000
|
(1)
|
Exchange rate in U.S. Dollars per
1.00 Euro
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration in U.S. Dollars
|
|
$
|
14,850
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated purchase price including
net debt assumed
|
|
$
|
14,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 80 million (approximately $108 million
using the June 30, 2007 exchange rate of
1.00 = $1.35) of net debt assumed by
Schering-Plough.
|
P-7
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The preliminary allocation of the purchase price as of
June 30, 2007 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
Preliminary
Purchase Price
|
|
to
Net Assets
|
Allocation as of
June 30, 2007
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
$
|
5,450
|
(1)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
196
|
|
Net working capital, excluding
Inventories
|
|
|
28
|
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
|
(1,238
|
)
|
Acquisition related liabilities
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,173
|
|
In-process research and
development (IPR&D)
|
|
|
3,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated purchase price to be
allocated
|
|
$
|
14,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt assumed by
Schering-Plough
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated purchase price including
net debt assumed
|
|
$
|
14,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets
includes trade names, products and product rights, and other
identifiable intangibles, with a composite estimated useful live
of approximately 12 years.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts allocated to in-process research and development
will be charged to the statement of operations in the period the
Organon BioSciences acquisition is consummated. This IPR&D
amount is excluded from the unaudited pro forma condensed
statements of combined operations as this charge is not expected
to have a continuing impact on operations.
|
|
|
2.
|
HISTORICAL
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ORGANON BIOSCIENCES
|
The historical combined financial statements of Organon
BioSciences as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2006, prepared in accordance with IFRS, are included in the
accompanying prospectus. A reconciliation of Organon
BioSciences combined net income and combined invested
equity between U.S. GAAP and IFRS as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006 has been included in Note 32
to those financial statements included in the accompanying
prospectus.
The unaudited condensed combined interim financial statements of
Organon BioSciences as of and for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. A
reconciliation of Organon BioSciences combined net income
and combined invested equity between U.S. GAAP and IFRS as
of June 30, 2007 and for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 has been included as Note 21 to those
financial statements, included in the accompanying prospectus.
The amounts in the U.S. GAAP historical Organon
BioSciences columns in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements were derived from the Organon
BioSciences
P-8
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
historical annual audited and unaudited condensed combined
interim financial statements included in the accompanying
prospectus and have been adjusted for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP adjustments applied to the Organon BioSciences
IFRS financial statements, including but not limited to,
adjustments related to business combinations, pensions and other
postretirement benefits, the impairment of goodwill, research
and development costs, differing treatment of subsequent events
between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, tax on elimination of
intercompany profits and deferred income taxes.
|
|
|
|
Currency amounts have been translated from Euro to
U.S. Dollars (at the rates specified in Note 1 to
these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements in accordance with SFAS No. 52
Foreign Currency Translation.)
|
Schering-Plough
is in the process of reviewing Organon BioSciences
accounting policies and financial statement classifications. As
a result of that review, it may become necessary to make
reclassifications or adjustments to the consolidated financial
statements of
Schering-Plough
on a prospective basis.
Pro forma
condensed combined balance sheet adjustments
(a) Reflects the following financing transactions:
Issuance of the 2007 Preferred Stock for net proceeds of
$2.44 billion in August 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 57,500,000 common shares for net proceeds of
$1.54 billion in August 2007; and
|
|
|
|
Issuance of the Notes and draw down of debt under a committed
bridge facility for aggregate net proceeds of
$5.81 billion. The bridge facility has been classified as
long-term debt, reflecting
Schering-Ploughs
intention to replace the bridge facility with long-term debt of
varying maturities.
|
(b) Reflects use of cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments of $14.79 billion, including the financing
discussed in (a) above, to fund the purchase price.
(c) Reflects related party receivables, net and payables
that will be settled as part of the transaction.
(d) Reflects the adjustment of the historical Organon
BioSciences inventories to estimated fair value. Because this
adjustment is directly attributed to the transaction and will
not have a continuing impact, it is not reflected in the
unaudited pro forma condensed statements of combined operations.
However, this inventory adjustment will result in an increase in
cost of sales in the periods subsequent to the consummation of
the transaction during which the related inventories are sold.
(e) Reflects the adjustment to
step-up the
carrying values of the Organon BioSciences property, plant and
equipment to estimated fair value.
(f) Reflects the addition of goodwill from the purchase
price allocation of $4.17 billion and the elimination of
historical Organon BioSciences goodwill of $540 million.
(g) Reflects the portion of the purchase price allocated to
Organon BioSciences acquired identifiable intangible
assets.
(h) Reflects the portion of the purchase price allocated to
acquired in-process research and development projects that, as
of the closing date of the Organon BioSciences acquisition, will
not have reached technological feasibility and will have no
alternative future use. Because this expense is directly
attributable to the Organon BioSciences acquisition and will not
have a continuing impact, it is
P-9
SCHERING-PLOUGH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
not reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed statements of
combined operations. However, this item will be recorded as an
expense in the financial statements of
Schering-Plough
in the period that the Organon BioSciences acquisition is
completed.
(i) Reflects an estimate of acquisition-related liabilities.
(j) Reflects net deferred tax liabilities arising from the
acquisition.
(k) Reflects the elimination of all components of the
historical equity of Organon BioSciences.
Pro forma
condensed statement of combined operations
adjustments
(l) Reflects additional annual depreciation of
$45 million ($23 million on a six-month basis) related
to the fair value adjustment to depreciable property, plant and
equipment depreciated over a weighted average useful life of
approximately 15 years.
Also reflects annual amortization expense of $445 million
($222 million on a six-month basis) for identifiable
intangible assets in connection with the Organon BioSciences
acquisition at their estimated fair values.
(m) Adjustment reflects $262 million
($131 million on a six-month basis) of lower annual
interest income due to the use of cash to fund the Organon
BioSciences acquisition. An interest rate of 5.25%, which
represents
Schering-Ploughs
current weighted average interest rate, was used to estimate the
reduction in interest income.
Also reflects the increase in annual interest expense of
$321 million ($161 million on a six-month basis). The
weighted average interest rate used to calculate this adjustment
was 5.52% and is based on the terms of the variable rate bridge
facility and an estimate of the expected interest rate on the
Notes. A
1/8%
increase in the weighted average interest rate would increase
annual interest expense by approximately $7 million.
The bridge facility is expected to be refinanced into long-term
debt of varying maturities. The adjustments included in the
unaudited pro forma condensed statements of combined operations
do not reflect the interest rates to be incurred upon the
refinancing.
(n) Reflects the recognition of the income tax benefit of
the above pro forma adjustments at an estimated tax rate of 25%.
(o) Reflects the additional Preferred Stock dividends
resulting from the issuance of the 2007 Preferred Stock.
(p) Earnings per share amounts are calculated using net
income available to common shareholders as the numerator and
reflect the following weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
2004
Preferred
|
|
|
Condensed
|
|
(all share
amounts in millions)
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
Basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)(1)
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
Basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
(1) |
65 million common shares obtainable upon conversion of the
2004 Preferred Stock were dilutive to
Schering-Ploughs
historical earnings per share for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, but would not be dilutive to the pro forma
condensed combined earnings per share and are therefore excluded
from the computation. The 2007 Preferred Stock is assumed to be
anti-dilutive to the pro forma condensed combined earnings per
share and is therefore excluded from the computation for all
periods presented.
|
P-10
PROSPECTUS
Schering-Plough
Corporation
Debt Securities
Preferred Shares
Common Shares
Schering-Plough
may offer from time to time in one or more classes or series,
together or separately:
|
|
|
|
|
debt securities;
|
|
|
|
preferred shares;
|
|
|
|
common shares; or
|
|
|
|
any combination of these securities.
|
Schering-Plough
will provide specific terms of any securities that it offers for
sale in supplements to this prospectus. You should read this
prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully before you
invest. This prospectus may not be used to sell securities
unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement or a term sheet.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Schering-Plough
may sell these securities on a continuous or delayed basis
directly, through agents or underwriters as designated from time
to time, or through a combination of these methods.
Schering-Plough
reserves the sole right to accept, and together with any agents,
dealers and underwriters, reserves the right to reject, in whole
or in part, any proposed purchase of securities. If any agents,
dealers or underwriters are involved in the sale of any
securities, the applicable prospectus supplement will set forth
any applicable commissions or discounts.
Schering-Ploughs
net proceeds from the sale of securities will also be set forth
in the applicable prospectus supplement.
The date of this prospectus is August 2, 2007.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
The information contained in this prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. You should rely only on the information provided
in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and the
applicable prospectus supplement.
Schering-Plough
has not authorized anyone else to provide you with different
information.
Schering-Plough
is not making an offer of any securities in any state where the
offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the
information in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement is
accurate as of any date other than the date on the front cover
of those documents and that any information
Schering-Plough
has incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date other
than the date of the document incorporated by reference or such
other date referred to in such document, regardless of the time
of delivery of this prospectus or any sale or issuance of a
security.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that
Schering-Plough
has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission using a
shelf registration process. Under this shelf
registration process,
Schering-Plough
may from time to time sell or issue, in one or more offerings,
Schering-Ploughs:
|
|
|
|
|
debt securities, in one or more series, which may be senior debt
securities or subordinated debt securities;
|
|
|
|
preferred shares;
|
|
|
|
common shares; or
|
|
|
|
any combination of these securities.
|
This prospectus provides you with a general description of the
securities
Schering-Plough
may offer. Each time
Schering-Plough
sells or issues securities,
Schering-Plough
will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain
information about the terms of that specific offering of
securities and the specific manner in which they may be offered.
The prospectus supplement may also add to, update or change any
of the information contained in this prospectus and,
accordingly, to the extent inconsistent, the information in this
prospectus is superseded by the information in the prospectus
supplement. The prospectus supplement may also contain
information about any material federal income tax considerations
relating to the securities described in the prospectus
supplement. You should read both this prospectus and the
applicable prospectus supplement together with the additional
information described under Where You Can Find More
Information before making an investment in
Schering-Ploughs
securities.
2
This prospectus contains summaries of certain provisions
contained in some of the documents described herein, but
reference is made to the actual documents for complete
information. All of the summaries are qualified in their
entirety by the actual documents. Copies of some of the
documents referred to herein have been filed, or will be filed
or incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part, and you may obtain
copies of those documents as described below under Where
You Can Find More Information.
Because
Schering-Plough
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
referred to as the Securities Act,
Schering-Plough
may add to and offer additional securities, including secondary
securities, by filing a prospectus supplement with the SEC at
the time of the offer.
The registration statement that contains this prospectus
(including the exhibits to the registration statement) contains
additional information about
Schering-Plough
and the securities offered under this prospectus. The
registration statement can be read at the SEC website
(http://www.sec.gov) or at the SEC offices listed under
the heading Where You Can Find More Information.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference or deemed to be incorporated by
reference in this prospectus or in a prospectus supplement
related to an offering prepared by or on behalf of
Schering-Plough
or used or referred to by
Schering-Plough.
Schering-Plough
has not authorized anyone else to provide you with different or
additional information. You should not rely on any other
information or representations.
Schering-Ploughs
affairs may change after this prospectus and any related
prospectus supplement are conveyed. You should not assume that
the information in this prospectus and any related prospectus
supplement is accurate as of any date other than the dates
indicated in such documents. You should read all information
supplementing this prospectus.
All references to
Schering-Plough
Corporation,
Schering-Plough
and the company in this prospectus refer to
Schering-Plough
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless, in each
case, the context clearly indicates otherwise.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Schering-Plough
files reports, proxy statements and other information with the
SEC. You may read and copy any document
Schering-Plough
files at the SECs public reference room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. In
addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports,
proxy statements and other information that
Schering-Plough
electronically files. The address of the SECs website is
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also inspect
Schering-Ploughs
SEC reports and other information at the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
INCORPORATION
OF INFORMATION
SCHERING-PLOUGH
FILES WITH THE SEC
The SEC allows
Schering-Plough
to incorporate by reference the information it files with them,
which means:
|
|
|
|
|
incorporated documents are considered part of this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents; and
|
|
|
|
information that
Schering-Plough
files with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this
incorporated information.
|
Schering-Plough
incorporates by reference the documents listed below, which were
filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, referred to as the Exchange Act, (excluding any
portions of such documents that have been furnished
but not filed for purposes of the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
its 2006
10-K filed
with the SEC on February 28, 2007;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
its first quarter 2007
10-Q filed
with the SEC on April 27, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its second quarter 2007
10-Q filed
with the SEC on July 27, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 29, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 16, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 19, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 28, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 11, 2007;
|
|
|
|
its 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 23, 2007;
|
|
|
|
the following sections of its Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Schedule 14A filed with
the SEC on April 20, 2007: Proposal One: Elect
Eleven Directors for a One-Year Term,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance, Information About the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors and its Practices, Committees
of the Board of Directors, Executive
Compensation, Director Compensation,
Stock Ownership, Certain Transactions,
Procedures for Related Party Transactions and Director
Independence Assessments, Director
Independence, and Proposal Two: Ratify the
Designation of Deloitte & Touche LLP to Audit
Schering-Ploughs
Books and Accounts for 2007; and
|
|
|
|
the description of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares contained in its Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed with the SEC on March 16, 1979, and any amendment or
report filed for the purpose of updating such description.
|
Schering-Plough
also incorporates by reference each of the following documents
that
Schering-Plough
will file with the SEC after the date of this prospectus
(excluding any portions of such documents that have been
furnished but not filed for purposes of
the Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
reports filed under Section 13(a) and (c) of the
Exchange Act;
|
|
|
|
definitive proxy or information statements filed under Section
14 of the Exchange Act in connection with any subsequent
stockholders meeting; and
|
|
|
|
any reports filed under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
|
Schering-Plough
does not incorporate by reference any information furnished
under items 2.02 or 7.01 (or corresponding information
furnished under item 9.01 or included as an exhibit) in any
past or current
Form 8-K
filing (unless otherwise indicated).
You may request a copy of any filings referred to above
(excluding exhibits not specifically incorporated by reference
into the filing), at no cost, by contacting
Schering-Plough
in writing or by telephone
(908-298-7436)
at the following address: Investor Relations,
Schering-Plough
Corporation, 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033.
Documents may also be available on
Schering-Ploughs
website at http://www.schering-plough.com. Please note
that all references to
http://www.schering-plough.com in this
prospectus and any prospectus supplement that accompanies this
prospectus and the related registration statement are inactive
textual references only and that the information contained on
Schering-Ploughs
website is neither incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus or any accompanying
prospectus supplement nor intended to be used in connection with
any offering hereunder.
4
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus, the prospectus supplement, the documents
incorporated by reference in this prospectus and other written
reports and oral statements made from time to time by
Schering-Plough
may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements relate to expectations or forecasts
of future events.
Schering-Plough
uses words such as anticipate, believe,
could, estimate, expect,
forecast, project, intend,
plan, potential, will, and
other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a
discussion of potential future events, circumstances or future
operating or financial performance. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts.
In particular, forward-looking statements include statements
relating to future actions; ability to access the capital
markets; prospective products or product approvals; timing and
conditions of regulatory approvals; patent and other
intellectual property protection; future performance or results
of current and anticipated products; sales efforts; research and
development programs and anticipated spending; estimates of
rebates, discounts and returns; expenses and programs to reduce
expenses; the anticipated cost of and savings from reductions in
work force; the outcome of contingencies such as litigation and
investigations; growth strategy; expected synergies and
financial results.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and
uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on
circumstances that will occur in the future.
Schering-Ploughs
actual results may vary materially from those anticipated in
such forward-looking statements as a result of many factors,
some of which are more fully described in the following
Risk Factors section, in the accompanying prospectus
supplement and
Schering-Ploughs
reports to the SEC incorporated by reference into this
prospectus, and there are no guarantees with respect to
Schering-Ploughs
performance.
Schering-Plough
does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking
statement for any reason.
Schering-Ploughs
business faces significant risks. Before you invest in any of
Schering-Ploughs
securities, in addition to the other information in this
prospectus and in the accompanying prospectus supplement, you
should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties identified
in
Schering-Ploughs
reports to the SEC incorporated by reference into this
prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement. These
risks may not be the only risks
Schering-Plough
faces. Additional risks that
Schering-Plough
does not yet know of or that
Schering-Plough
currently believes are immaterial or are based on assumptions
that are later determined to be inaccurate also may impair
Schering-Ploughs
business. If any of the risks described herein or in the
accompanying prospectus supplement or
Schering-Ploughs
reports to the SEC actually occur,
Schering-Ploughs
business and operating results could be materially harmed. This
could cause the value of the purchased securities to decline,
and you may lose all or part of your investment.
5
Schering-Plough
is a global science-based company that discovers, develops and
manufactures pharmaceuticals for three customer
marketshuman prescription, consumer and animal health.
While most of the research and development activity is directed
toward prescription products, there are important applications
of this central research and development platform into the
consumer healthcare and animal health products.
Schering-Plough
also accesses external innovation via partnering, in-licensing
and acquisition for all three customer markets.
Schering-Ploughs
principal executive offices are located at 2000 Galloping Hill
Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, and
Schering-Ploughs
telephone number is
(908) 298-4000.
Schering-Plough
was incorporated in New Jersey in 1970.
RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
DIVIDENDS
Schering-Ploughs
consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 through 2006 is set forth below. For the
purpose of computing these ratios, earnings consist
of income/(loss) before income taxes and equity income, plus
fixed charges (other than capitalized interest and preference
dividends), amortization of capitalized interest and distributed
income of equity investee; and fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends consist of interest expense, capitalized
interest, preference dividends and one-third of rentals, which
Schering-Plough
believes to be a reasonable estimate of an interest factor on
leases.
Schering-Plough
includes interest expense or interest income on unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of income tax expense. The ratio was
calculated by dividing the sum of the fixed charges into the sum
of the earnings before taxes and fixed charges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)*
|
|
|
0.4
|
**
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004, earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends by $332 million. |
|
** |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2003, earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges by $70 million. |
Unless the applicable prospectus supplement indicates otherwise,
Schering-Plough
currently intends to use the net proceeds from any sale of the
offered securities for general corporate purposes, which may
include, among other things, expenses to acquire additional
marketed products and pipeline projects (through acquisitions of
companies or through product licenses which may include
royalties, license fees and milestone payments), research and
development costs, litigation costs, the repayment of debt,
other capital expenses and other operating expenses.
Schering-Plough
may temporarily invest funds that are not immediately needed for
these general corporate purposes. If
Schering-Plough
intends to use the proceeds to repay outstanding debt,
Schering-Plough
will provide details about the debt that is being repaid in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
6
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
This section contains a description of
Schering-Ploughs
capital stock. The following summary of the terms of
Schering-Ploughs
capital stock is not meant to be complete and is qualified by
reference to
Schering-Ploughs
amended and restated certificate of incorporation, referred to
as the certificate of incorporation, and
Schering-Ploughs
amended and restated by-laws, referred to as the by-laws, which
are incorporated by reference as exhibits into the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
As of June 30, 2007,
Schering-Ploughs
authorized capital stock consisted of:
(i) 2,400,000,000 common shares, par value $0.50 per share,
of which:
|
|
|
|
|
1,496,297,204 were issued and outstanding,
|
|
|
|
547,238,751 were issued and held in treasury,
|
|
|
|
80,040,000 were reserved for issuance upon conversion of the
6.00% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock issued in 2004,
referred to as the 2004 Preferred Stock, and
|
|
|
|
166,632,803 were reserved for issuance under stock incentive
plans; and
|
(ii) 50,000,000 preferred shares, par value $1.00 per
share, of which:
|
|
|
|
|
28,750,000 were designated as the 2004 Preferred Stock
(28,750,000 shares of 2004 Preferred Stock will
automatically convert into common shares on September 14,
2007, unless earlier converted, and such preferred shares will
become undesignated and available for issuance in the future),
|
|
|
|
12,000,000 were designated as Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock (which, in connection with the expiration of
Schering-Ploughs
shareholder rights plan on July 10, 2007, were redesignated
as authorized but unissued preferred shares), and
|
|
|
|
9,250,000 which are undesignated.
|
Common
Shares
Holders of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares, subject to any preferential rights of the holders
of any preferred shares, are entitled to participate equally and
ratably in dividends when and as declared by
Schering-Ploughs
board of directors. In the event of the liquidation or
dissolution of
Schering-Plough,
holders of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares are entitled to share ratably in the remaining
assets of
Schering-Plough
available for distribution, subject to prior or equal
distribution rights of any holders of preferred shares. Record
holders of common shares are entitled to one vote per share for
the election of directors and upon all matters on which holders
of common shares are entitled to vote. Holders of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares do not have cumulative voting rights. There are no
preemptive or conversion rights applicable to
Schering-Ploughs
common shares. All outstanding shares of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares are fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred
Shares
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation provides that its board of
directors is authorized to issue preferred shares from time to
time in one or more series without stockholder approval. Subject
to limitations prescribed by law and
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation, the board of directors may fix for
any series of preferred shares the number of shares of such
series and the voting powers, designations, preferences, rights,
qualifications, limitations and restrictions of such series.
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation provides that whenever
Schering-Plough
is in default as to accrued dividends on preferred shares in an
amount equivalent to six quarterly dividends, the holders of
preferred shares, voting separately as a class, will be entitled
to elect two directors at the next annual or special meeting of
Schering-Ploughs
shareholders. The right of holders
7
of preferred shares to elect two directors will continue until
dividends in default on the preferred shares have been paid in
full or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof
has been set aside. During any time that the holders of
preferred shares, voting as a class, are entitled to elect two
directors, as described in this paragraph, the holders of any
series of preferred shares normally entitled to participate with
the holders of the common shares in the election of directors
shall not be entitled to participate with the holders of the
common shares in the election of such directors.
For any series of preferred shares that
Schering-Plough
may issue pursuant to this prospectus,
Schering-Ploughs
board of directors will determine and the prospectus supplement
relating to such series will describe:
|
|
|
|
|
the designation and number of shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rate and time at which, and the preferences and conditions
under which, any dividends will be paid on shares of such
series, as well as whether such dividends are cumulative or
non-cumulative and participating or non-participating;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to convertibility or exchangeability of
the shares of such series;
|
|
|
|
the rights and preferences, if any, of holders of shares of such
series upon
Schering-Ploughs
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of its affairs;
|
|
|
|
the voting powers, if any, of the holders of shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
any provisions relating to the redemption of the shares of such
series;
|
|
|
|
whether and upon what terms a sinking fund will be used to
purchase or redeem the shares;
|
|
|
|
any limitations on
Schering-Ploughs
ability to pay dividends or make distributions on, or acquire or
redeem, other securities while shares of such series are
outstanding;
|
|
|
|
any conditions or restrictions on
Schering-Ploughs
ability to issue additional shares of such series or other
securities; and
|
|
|
|
any other relative powers, preferences and participating,
optional or special rights of shares of such series, and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof.
|
When
Schering-Plough
issues preferred shares under this prospectus and any applicable
prospectus supplement, the shares will be fully paid and
non-assessable and will not have, or be subject to, any
preemptive or similar rights.
Anti-takeover
Protections
The following discussion summarizes certain provisions of the
New Jersey Business Corporation Act, as amended, referred to as
the NJBCA, and of
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation and by-laws, which may have the
effect of prohibiting, raising the costs of, or otherwise
impeding, a change of control of
Schering-Plough,
whether by merger, consolidation or sale of assets or stock (by
tender offer or otherwise), or by other methods.
Limits on
Shareholder Action by Written Consent; Special
Meetings
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that, subject
to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred shares
then outstanding, any action required or permitted to be taken
by
Schering-Ploughs
shareholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special
meeting of shareholders and may not be effected by any consent
in writing by such shareholders unless all of the shareholders
entitled to vote on the matter consent in writing.
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation and by-laws also provide that the
affirmative vote of the holders of more than 50% of the voting
power of all of the shares entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class, will
be required to amend
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation or by-laws with respect to
shareholder action by written consent.
8
Except as otherwise provided by the NJBCA, under
Schering-Ploughs
by-laws, a special meeting of shareholders may only be called by
the Chairman of
Schering-Ploughs
board of directors,
Schering-Ploughs
Chief Executive Officer or board of directors and shall be held
at such time and such place and for such purpose(s) as stated in
the notice of the meeting. No business other than that stated in
the notice of meeting may be transacted at any special meeting.
The above provisions may have the effect of delaying
consideration of a stockholder proposal until the next annual
meeting unless a special meeting is called by the Chairman of
Schering-Ploughs
board of directors, Chief Executive Officer or board of
directors.
Corporations
Best Interest
Under the NJBCA, the director of a New Jersey corporation may
consider, in discharging his or her duties to the corporation
and in determining what he or she reasonably believes to be in
the best interest of the corporation, any of the following (in
addition to the effects of any action on shareholders):
(i) the effects of the action on the corporations
employees, suppliers, creditors and customers, (ii) the
effects of the action on the community in which the corporation
operates, and (iii) the long-term as well as the short-term
interest of the corporation and its shareholders, including the
possibility that these interests may be best served by the
continued independence of the corporation. If, on the basis of
the foregoing factors, the board of directors determines that
any proposal or offer to acquire the corporation is not in the
best interest of the corporation, it may reject such proposal or
offer, in which event the board of directors will have no duty
to remove any obstacles to, or refrain from impeding, such
proposal or offer.
Required Vote
for Authorization of Certain Actions; Anti-Greenmail
Provisions
Under the NJBCA, the consummation of a merger or consolidation
of a New Jersey corporation organized subsequent to
January 1, 1969, such as
Schering-Plough,
requires the approval of such corporations board of
directors and the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by each of the holders of shares of the corporation
entitled to vote thereon and any class or series entitled to
vote thereon as a class, unless such corporation is the
surviving corporation, and: (i) such corporations
certificate of incorporation is not amended, (ii) the
stockholders of the surviving corporation whose shares were
outstanding immediately before the effective date of the merger
will hold the same number of shares, with identical
designations, preferences, limitations and rights, immediately
after the merger or consolidation, as the case may be, and
(iii) the number of voting shares and participating shares
outstanding after the merger will not exceed by more than 40%
the total number of voting or participating shares of the
surviving corporation immediately before the merger. Similarly,
in the case of a New Jersey corporation organized subsequent to
1969, such as
Schering-Plough,
a sale of all or substantially all of a corporations
assets other than in the ordinary course of business, or a
voluntary dissolution of a corporation, requires the approval of
such corporations board of directors and the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast by each of the holders of
shares of the corporation entitled to vote thereon and any class
or series entitled to vote thereon as a class.
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation contains an
anti-greenmail provision pursuant to which
Schering-Plough
or its subsidiaries may not purchase shares of voting stock from
a 5% or greater shareholder at a per share price in excess of
the market price unless (a) approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of the amount of voting power of the voting
stock equal to the sum of the voting power of such 5% or greater
shareholder and a majority of the voting power of the remaining
outstanding shares of voting stock, voting together as a single
class, or (b) the purchase is made pursuant to an offer
made available to all holders of the same class of stock or an
open market purchase.
No Rights Plan
in Effect
The preferred share purchase right (commonly known as a
poison pill) that
Schering-Plough
declared as a dividend on each share of its common stock on
June 24, 1997 expired on July 10, 2007. The
Schering-Plough
board of directors committed to
Schering-Ploughs
shareholders that no
9
new shareholder rights plan will be adopted in the future,
unless the plan is submitted to shareholders for approval within
12 months of adoption. This commitment is reflected in the
Schering-Plough
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Restrictions
on Business Combinations with Certain Stockholders
The NJBCA provides that no corporation organized under the laws
of New Jersey with its principal executive offices or
significant operations located in New Jersey (a resident
domestic corporation) may engage in any business
combination (as defined in the NJBCA) with any interested
stockholder (generally a 10% or greater stockholder) of such
corporation for a period of five years following such interested
stockholders stock acquisition, unless such business
combination is approved by the board of directors of such
corporation prior to the stock acquisition. A resident domestic
corporation, such as
Schering-Plough,
cannot opt out of the foregoing provisions of the NJBCA.
In addition, no resident domestic corporation may engage, at any
time, in any business combination with any interested
stockholder of such corporation other than: (i) a business
combination approved by the board of directors prior to the
stock acquisition, (ii) a business combination approved by
the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting
stock not beneficially owned by such interested stockholder at a
meeting called for such purpose, or (iii) a business
combination in which the interested stockholder pays a formula
price designed to ensure that all other stockholders receive at
least the highest price per share paid by such interested
stockholder.
In connection with business combinations with any 10%
stockholder,
Schering-Ploughs
certificate of incorporation contains provisions requiring the
approval of more than 50% of the voting power of all of the
then-outstanding shares of capital stock of the corporation
entitled to vote in the election of directors, voting together
as a single class. Any amendments or repeal of the business
combination provisions require the affirmative vote of the
holders of more than 50% of the voting power of all of the
shares entitled to vote, voting together as a single class.
DESCRIPTION
OF DEBT SECURITIES
Schering-Plough
may issue debt securities from time to time in one or more
series. The following description summarizes the general terms
and provisions of the debt securities that
Schering-Plough
may offer pursuant to this prospectus. The specific terms
relating to any series of debt securities that
Schering-Plough
may offer will be described in a prospectus supplement. Please
read and rely on the prospectus supplement, which includes
important information for investors evaluating an investment in
a series of
Schering-Plough
debt securities. Because the terms of specific series of debt
securities offered may differ from the general information that
Schering-Plough
has provided below, you should rely on information in the
applicable prospectus supplement that contradicts any
information below.
As required by federal law for all bonds and notes of companies
that are publicly offered, the debt securities will be governed
by a document called an indenture. An indenture is a
contract between a financial institution, acting on your behalf
as trustee of the debt securities offered, and
Schering-Plough.
The debt securities will be issued pursuant to an indenture that
Schering-Plough
will enter into with a trustee. References to the
indenture in this prospectus are to the indenture,
dated November 26, 2003, as amended and restated, between
Schering-Plough
and The Bank of New York, as trustee, as may be supplemented by
any supplemental indenture applicable to your debt securities.
The trustee has two main roles. First, subject to some
limitations on the extent to which the trustee can act on your
behalf, the trustee can enforce your rights against
Schering-Plough
if
Schering-Plough
defaults on its obligations under the indenture. Second, the
trustee performs certain administrative duties for
Schering-Plough
with respect to the debt securities. Unless otherwise provided
in any applicable prospectus supplement, the following section
is a summary of the principal terms and provisions that will be
included in the indenture. The indenture has been filed as an
exhibit incorporated by reference in the registration statement
of which this prospectus is a part. If this
10
summary refers to particular provisions of the indenture, such
provisions, including the definitions of terms, are incorporated
by reference in this prospectus as part of the summary.
Schering-Plough
urges you to read the indenture and any supplement thereto
because these documents, and not this section or any description
of the debt securities in any prospectus supplement, define your
rights as a holder of debt securities.
In this Description of Debt Securities section,
Schering-Plough
refers to
Schering-Plough
Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries, unless otherwise
expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.
General
The indenture does not limit the amount of debt that
Schering-Plough
may issue under the indenture or otherwise.
Under the indenture,
Schering-Plough
may issue the securities in one or more series. The securities
may have the same or various maturities. The securities may be
issued at par, at a premium or with original issue discount.
Schering-Plough
may also reopen a previous issue of securities and issue
additional securities of the series.
The debt securities described in this prospectus and any
prospectus supplement will be
Schering-Ploughs
direct unsecured obligations. Senior debt securities will rank
equally with
Schering-Ploughs
other unsecured and senior indebtedness. Subordinated debt
securities will be unsecured and subordinated in right of
payment to the prior payment in full of all of
Schering-Ploughs
unsecured and senior indebtedness. See
Subordination below. Any of
Schering-Ploughs
secured indebtedness will rank ahead of the debt securities to
the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness. Also,
Schering-Plough
conducts operations primarily through its subsidiaries and
substantially all of
Schering-Ploughs
consolidated assets are held by its subsidiaries. Accordingly,
Schering-Ploughs
cash flow and
Schering-Ploughs
ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities will
be largely dependent on the earnings of its subsidiaries and the
distribution or other payment of these earnings to
Schering-Plough
in the form of dividends, loans or advances, and repayment of
loans and advances from
Schering-Plough.
Schering-Ploughs
subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have
no obligation to pay the amounts which will be due on
Schering-Ploughs
debt securities or to make any funds available for payment of
amounts which will be due on
Schering-Ploughs
debt securities. Therefore,
Schering-Ploughs
rights, and the rights of
Schering-Ploughs
creditors, including the rights of the holders of the debt
securities to participate in any distribution of assets of any
of
Schering-Ploughs
subsidiaries, if such subsidiary were to be liquidated or
reorganized, is subject to the prior claims of the
subsidiarys creditors. To the extent that
Schering-Plough
may be a creditor with recognized claims against its
subsidiaries,
Schering-Ploughs
claims will still be effectively subordinated to any security
interest in, or mortgages or other liens on, the assets of the
subsidiary that are senior to
Schering-Plough.
Terms
The prospectus supplement relating to any series of debt
securities being offered will include specific terms relating to
the offering. These terms will include, among other terms, some
or all of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the title and type of the series;
|
|
|
|
the total principal amount;
|
|
|
|
the percentage of the principal amount at which the securities
will be issued;
|
|
|
|
the dates on which the principal of the securities will be
payable;
|
|
|
|
any payments due if the maturity of the securities is
accelerated;
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
any interest rates or the method of determining the interest
rates;
|
|
|
|
the dates from which any interest will accrue or the method of
determining those dates;
|
|
|
|
the interest payment record and payment dates;
|
|
|
|
whether the securities are redeemable at
Schering-Ploughs
option;
|
|
|
|
any sinking fund or other provisions that would obligate
Schering-Plough
to repurchase or otherwise redeem the securities;
|
|
|
|
the option of either
Schering-Plough
or the holder to elect the currency (for example, U.S. dollars,
euros, or other
non-U.S.
currency, currency unit or composite currency) of payment on the
securities;
|
|
|
|
the currency of the payment of principal, any premium, and any
interest;
|
|
|
|
any index or other method
Schering-Plough
will use to determine the amount of principal or any premium or
interest;
|
|
|
|
the form in which
Schering-Plough
will issue the securities (for example, registered or bearer
book-entry form, or registered or bearer certificated form) and
any restrictions related to the form;
|
|
|
|
any covenants, defaults, events of default or provisions
applicable to the securities;
|
|
|
|
any special tax implications, including provisions for original
issue discount securities, if offered;
|
|
|
|
any provisions for convertibility or exchangeability of the debt
securities into or for any other securities;
|
|
|
|
any provisions granting special rights to the holders of the
securities upon the occurrence of specified events;
|
|
|
|
the denominations of the securities;
|
|
|
|
whether the securities are subject to subordination and, if so,
the subordination terms; and
|
|
|
|
any other specific terms of the securities.
|
Schering-Plough
may in the future issue debt securities other than the debt
securities described in this prospectus. There is no requirement
that any other debt securities be issued under the indenture.
Thus,
Schering-Plough
may issue any other debt securities under other indentures or
documentation containing provisions different from those
included in the indenture or any series of securities issued
pursuant to this prospectus.
Events of
Default
When
Schering-Plough
uses the term event of default in the indenture,
here are some examples of what is meant. An event of default
occurs if:
|
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
fails to make the principal or any premium payment on any debt
security when due;
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
fails to pay interest on any debt security for 45 days
after payment was due;
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
fails to make any sinking fund payment when due;
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
fails to perform any other covenant in the indenture and this
failure continues for 90 days after
Schering-Plough
receives written notice of it from the trustee or the holders of
at least 25% in principal amount of outstanding debt securities
of that series; or
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
or a court takes certain actions relating to the bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization of the company.
|
12
The supplemental indenture or the form of security for a
particular series of debt securities may include additional
events of default or changes to the events of default described
above. The events of default applicable to a particular series
of debt securities will be described in the prospectus
supplement relating to that series. A default under
Schering-Ploughs
other indebtedness will not be a default under the indenture for
the debt securities covered by this prospectus, and a default
under one series of debt securities will not necessarily be a
default under another series. The trustee may withhold notice to
the holders of debt securities of any default (except for
defaults that involve
Schering-Ploughs
failure to pay principal or interest) if it considers such
withholding of notice to be in the best interests of the holders.
If an event of default with respect to outstanding debt
securities of any series occurs and is continuing, then the
trustee or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of
outstanding debt securities of that series may declare, in a
written notice, the principal amount (or specified amount) plus
accrued and unpaid interest on all debt securities of that
series to be immediately due and payable. If
Schering-Plough
or a court takes certain actions relating to the bankruptcy,
insolvency or reorganization of the company, the principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on all debt securities
will become immediately due and payable without any declaration
or other act on the part of the trustee or holders of
securities. At any time after a declaration of acceleration with
respect to debt securities of any series has been made, the
holders of a majority in principal amount (or specified amount)
of the outstanding debt securities of that series, by written
notice to
Schering-Plough
and the trustee, may rescind and annul such declaration and its
consequences if:
|
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
has paid or deposited with the trustee a sum sufficient to pay
overdue interest and overdue principal other than the
accelerated interest and principal; and
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
has cured or the holders have waived all events of default,
other than the non-payment of accelerated principal and interest
with respect to debt securities of that series, as provided in
the indenture.
|
Schering-Plough
refers you to the prospectus supplement relating to any series
of debt securities that are discount securities for the
particular provisions relating to acceleration of a portion of
the principal amount of the discount securities upon the
occurrence of an event of default.
If a default in the performance or breach of the indenture shall
have occurred and be continuing, the holders of not less than a
majority in principal amount of the outstanding securities of
all series, by notice to the trustee, may waive any past event
of default or its consequences under the indenture.
However, an event of default cannot be waived with respect to
any series of securities in the following two circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to pay the principal of, and premium, if any, or
interest on any security; or
|
|
|
|
a covenant or provision that cannot be modified or amended
without the consent of each holder of outstanding securities of
that series.
|
Other than its duties in case of a default, the trustee is not
obligated to exercise any of its rights or powers under the
indenture at the request, order or direction of any holders,
unless the holders offer the trustee reasonable indemnity. If
they provide this reasonable indemnity, the holders of a
majority in principal amount outstanding of any series of debt
securities may, subject to certain limitations, direct the time,
method and place for conducting any proceeding or any remedy
available to the trustee, or exercising any power conferred upon
the trustee, for any series of debt securities.
Schering-Plough
is required to deliver to the trustee an annual statement as to
Schering-Ploughs
fulfillment of all of its obligations under the indenture.
13
Defeasance
The term defeasance, as used in the indenture means
discharge from some or all of its obligations under the
indenture. If
Schering-Plough
deposits with the trustee sufficient cash or government
securities to pay the principal, any premium, interest and any
other sums due on the stated maturity date or a redemption date
of the securities of a particular series, then at
Schering-Ploughs
option:
|
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
will be discharged from its obligations with respect to the
securities of such series; or
|
|
|
|
Schering-Plough
will no longer be under any obligation to comply with certain
restrictive covenants under the indenture, and certain events of
default will no longer apply to
Schering-Plough.
|
If this happens, the holders of the securities of the affected
series will not be entitled to the benefits of the indenture
except for registration of transfer and exchange of debt
securities and replacement of lost, stolen or mutilated
securities. Such holders may look only to such deposited funds
or obligations for payment.
To exercise the defeasance option,
Schering-Plough
must deliver to the trustee an opinion of counsel that the
deposit and related defeasance would not cause the holders of
the securities to recognize income, gain or loss for federal
income tax purposes.
Schering-Plough
must also deliver any ruling received from or published by the
United States Internal Revenue Service if
Schering-Plough
is discharged from its obligations with respect to the
securities.
Modification of
the Indenture
Under the indenture,
Schering-Ploughs
rights and obligations, as well as the rights of the holders,
may be modified if the holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of each
series affected by the modification consent to the modification.
However, none of the following modifications will be effective
against any holder without its consent:
|
|
|
|
|
modification of the maturity date;
|
|
|
|
modification of the principal and interest payment terms;
|
|
|
|
modification of the currency for payment;
|
|
|
|
impairment of the right to sue for the enforcement of payment at
the maturity of the debt security;
|
|
|
|
modification of any conversion rights; or
|
|
|
|
modification reducing the percentage required for modifications
or modifying the foregoing requirements or reducing the
percentage required to waive certain specified covenants.
|
In addition, no supplemental indenture shall adversely affect
the rights of any holder of senior indebtedness with respect to
subordination without the consent of such holder.
Subordination
The extent to which a particular series of subordinated debt
securities may be subordinated to
Schering-Ploughs
unsecured and senior indebtedness will be set forth in the
prospectus supplement for any such series. The indenture may be
modified by a supplemental indenture to reflect such
subordination provisions.
14
Form and
Denomination of Debt Securities
Denomination
of Debt Securities
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, the debt securities will be denominated in
U.S. dollars, in minimum denominations of $1,000 and
multiples thereof.
Registered
Form
Schering-Plough
may issue the debt securities in registered form. In that case,
Schering-Plough
may issue the securities either in book-entry form only or in
certificated form.
Schering-Plough
will issue registered debt securities in book-entry form only,
unless it specifies otherwise in the applicable prospectus
supplement. Debt securities issued in book-entry form will be
represented by global securities.
Bearer
Form
Schering-Plough
also will have the option of issuing debt securities in
non-registered form, as bearer securities, if
Schering-Plough
issues the securities outside the United States to
non-U.S. persons.
In that case, the applicable prospectus supplement will set
forth the mechanics for holding the bearer securities, including
the procedures for receiving payments, for exchanging the bearer
securities for registered securities of the same series and for
receiving notices. The applicable prospectus supplement will
also describe the requirements with respect to
Schering-Ploughs
maintenance of offices or agencies outside the United States and
the applicable U.S. federal tax law requirements.
Holders of
Registered Debt Securities
Book-Entry
Holders
Schering-Plough
will issue registered debt securities in book-entry form only,
unless
Schering-Plough
specifies otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Debt securities held in book-entry form will be represented by
one or more global securities registered in the name of a
depositary or its nominee. The depositary or its nominee will
hold such global securities on behalf of financial institutions
that participate in such depositarys book-entry system.
These participating financial institutions, in turn, hold
beneficial interests in the global securities either on their
own behalf or on behalf of their customers.
Under the indenture, only the person in whose name a debt
security is registered is recognized as the holder of that debt
security. Consequently, for debt securities issued in global
form,
Schering-Plough
will recognize only the depositary or its nominee as the holder
of the debt securities, and
Schering-Plough
will make all payments on the debt securities to the depositary
or its nominee. The depositary will then pass along the payments
that it receives to its participants, which in turn will pass
the payments along to their customers who are the beneficial
owners of the debt securities. The depositary and its
participants do so under agreements they have made with one
another or with their customers or by law; they are not
obligated to do so under the terms of the debt securities or the
terms of the indenture.
As a result, investors will not own debt securities directly.
Instead, they will own beneficial interests in a global
security, through a bank, broker or other financial institution
that participates in the depositarys book-entry system, or
that holds an interest through a participant in the
depositarys book-entry system. As long as the debt
securities are issued in global form, investors will be indirect
holders, and not holders, of the debt securities.
15
Street Name
Holders
In the event that
Schering-Plough
issues debt securities in certificated form, or in the event
that a global security is terminated, investors may choose to
hold their debt securities either in their own names or in
street name. Debt securities held in street name are
registered in the name of a bank, broker or other financial
institution chosen by the investor, and the investor would hold
a beneficial interest in those debt securities through the
account that he or she maintains at such bank, broker or other
financial institution.
For debt securities held in street name,
Schering-Plough
will recognize only the intermediary banks, brokers and other
financial institutions in whose names the debt securities are
registered as the holders of those debt securities, and
Schering-Plough
will make all payments on those debt securities to them. These
institutions will pass along the payments that they receive from
Schering-Plough
to their customers who are the beneficial owners pursuant to
agreements that they have entered into with such customers or by
law; they are not obligated to do so under the terms of the debt
securities or the terms of the indenture. Investors who hold
debt securities in street name will be indirect holders, and not
holders, of the debt securities.
Registered
Holders
Schering-Ploughs
obligations, as well as the obligations of the trustee and those
of any third parties employed by the trustee or
Schering-Plough,
run only to the registered holders of the debt securities.
Schering-Plough
does not have obligations to investors who hold beneficial
interests in global securities, in street name or by any other
indirect means and who are, therefore, not the registered
holders of the debt securities. This will be the case whether an
investor chooses to be an indirect holder of a debt security, or
has no choice in the matter because
Schering-Plough
is issuing the debt securities only in global form.
For example, once
Schering-Plough
makes a payment or gives a notice to the registered holder of
the debt securities,
Schering-Plough
has no further responsibility with respect to such payment or
notice even if that registered holder is required, under
agreements with depositary participants or customers or by law,
to pass it along to the indirect holders but does not do so.
Similarly, if
Schering-Plough
wants to obtain the approval of the holders for any purpose (for
example, to amend an indenture or to relieve
Schering-Plough
of the consequences of a default or of
Schering-Ploughs
obligation to comply with a particular provision of an
indenture),
Schering-Plough
would seek the approval only from the registered holders, and
not the indirect holders, of the debt securities. Whether and
how the registered holders contact the indirect holders is up to
the registered holders.
Notwithstanding the above, references to you or
your in this description of debt securities are to
investors who invest in the debt securities being offered by
this prospectus, whether they are the registered holders or only
indirect holders of the debt securities offered. References to
your debt securities in this prospectus means the
series of debt securities in which you hold a direct or indirect
interest.
Special
Considerations for Indirect Holders
If you hold debt securities through a bank, broker or other
financial institution, either in book-entry form or in street
name,
Schering-Plough
urges you to check with that institution to find out:
|
|
|
|
|
how it handles securities payments and notices;
|
|
|
|
whether it imposes fees or charges;
|
|
|
|
how it would handle a request for its consent, as a registered
holder of the debt securities, if ever required;
|
|
|
|
if permitted for a particular series of debt securities, whether
and how you can instruct it to send you debt securities
registered in your own name so you can be a registered holder of
such debt securities;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
how it would exercise rights under the debt securities if there
were a default or other event triggering the need for holders to
act to protect their interests; and
|
|
|
|
if the debt securities are in book-entry form, how the
depositarys rules and procedures will affect these matters.
|
Global
Securities
A global security represents one or any other number of
individual debt securities. Generally, all debt securities
represented by the same global securities will have the same
terms. Each debt security issued in book-entry form will be
represented by a global security that
Schering-Plough
deposits with and registers in the name of a financial
institution or its nominee that
Schering-Plough
selects. The financial institution that
Schering-Plough
selects for this purpose is called the depositary. Unless
Schering-Plough
specifies otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, The
Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, known as DTC,
will be the depositary for debt securities that
Schering-Plough
issues in book-entry form.
A global security may not be transferred to or registered in the
name of anyone other than the depositary or its nominee, unless
special termination situations arise.
Schering-Plough
describes those situations below under Special
Situations When a Global Security Will Be Terminated. As a
result of these arrangements, the depositary, or its nominee,
will be the sole registered holder of all debt securities
represented by a global security, and investors will be
permitted to own only beneficial interests in a global security.
Beneficial interests must be held by means of an account with a
broker, bank or other financial institution that in turn has an
account either with the depositary or with another institution
that has an account with the depositary. Thus, an investor whose
security is represented by a global security will not be a
registered holder of the debt security, but an indirect holder
of a beneficial interest in the global security.
Special
Considerations for Global Securities
As an indirect holder, an investors rights relating to a
global security will be governed by the account rules of the
investors financial institution and of the depositary, as
well as general laws relating to securities transfers. The
depositary that holds the global security will be considered the
registered holder of the debt securities represented by such
global security.
If debt securities are issued only in the form of a global
security, an investor should be aware of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
An investor cannot cause the debt securities to be registered in
his or her name, and cannot obtain non-global certificates for
his or her interest in the debt securities, except in the
special situations described below under Special
Situations When a Global Security Will Be Terminated.
|
|
|
|
An investor will be an indirect holder and must look to his or
her own bank or broker for payments on the debt securities and
protection of his or her legal rights relating to the debt
securities, as described under Holders of Registered
Debt Securities above.
|
|
|
|
An investor may not be able to sell his or her interest in the
debt securities to some insurance companies and other
institutions that are required by law to own their securities in
non-book-entry form.
|
|
|
|
An investor may not be able to pledge his or her interest in the
debt securities in circumstances where certificates representing
the debt securities must be delivered to the lender or other
beneficiary of the pledge in order for the pledge to be
effective.
|
|
|
|
The depositarys policies, which may change from time to
time, will govern payments, transfers, exchanges and other
matters relating to an investors interest in the debt
securities. Neither the trustee nor
Schering-Plough
have any responsibility for any aspect of the depositarys
actions or
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
for the depositarys records of ownership interests in a
global security. Additionally, neither the trustee nor
Schering-Plough
supervise the depositary in any way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DTC requires that those who purchase and sell interests in a
global security that is deposited in its book-entry system use
immediately available funds. Your broker or bank may also
require you to use immediately available funds when purchasing
or selling interests in a global security.
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions that participate in the depositarys
book-entry system, and through which an investor holds its
interest in a global security, may also have their own policies
affecting payments, notices and other matters relating to the
debt security. There may be more than one financial intermediary
in the chain of ownership for an investor.
Schering-Plough
does not monitor and is not responsible for the actions of any
of such intermediaries.
|
Special
Situations When a Global Security Will Be
Terminated
In a few special situations described below, a global security
will be terminated and interests in the global security will be
exchanged for certificates in non-global form, referred to as
certificated debt securities. After such an
exchange, it will be up to the investor as to whether to hold
the certificated debt securities directly or in street name.
Schering-Plough
has described the rights of direct holders and street name
holders under Holders of Registered Debt
Securities above. Investors must consult their own banks
or brokers to find out how to have their interests in a global
security exchanged on termination of a global security for
certificated debt securities to be held directly in their own
names.
The special situations for termination of a global security are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
if the depositary notifies
Schering-Plough
that it is unwilling, unable or no longer qualified to continue
as depositary for that global security, and
Schering-Plough
does not appoint another institution to act as depositary within
90 days of such notification; or
|
|
|
|
if
Schering-Plough
notifies the trustee that it wishes to terminate that global
security.
|
The applicable prospectus supplement may list situations for
terminating a global security that would apply only to the
particular series of debt securities covered by such prospectus
supplement. If a global security were terminated, only the
depositary, and not
Schering-Plough
or the trustee, would be responsible for deciding the names of
the institutions in whose names the debt securities represented
by the global security would be registered and, therefore, who
would be the registered holders of those debt securities.
Form, Exchange
and Transfer of Registered Securities
If
Schering-Plough
ceases to issue registered debt securities in global form, it
will issue them:
|
|
|
|
|
only in fully registered certificated form; and
|
|
|
|
in the denominations specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
|
Holders may exchange their certificated securities for debt
securities of smaller denominations or combined into fewer debt
securities of larger denominations, as long as the total
principal amount is not changed.
Holders may exchange or transfer their certificated securities
at the trustees office.
Schering-Plough
has appointed the trustee to act as its agent for registering
debt securities in the names of holders transferring debt
securities.
Schering-Plough
may appoint another entity to perform these functions or perform
them itself.
Holders will not be required to pay a service charge to transfer
or exchange their certificated securities, but they may be
required to pay any tax or other governmental charge associated
with the transfer or exchange. The transfer or exchange will be
made only if
Schering-Ploughs
transfer agent is satisfied with the holders proof of
legal ownership.
18
If
Schering-Plough
has designated additional transfer agents for your debt
security, they will be named in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
Schering-Plough
may appoint additional transfer agents or cancel the appointment
of any particular transfer agent.
Schering-Plough
may also approve a change in the location of the office through
which any transfer agent acts.
If any certificated securities of a particular series are
redeemable and
Schering-Plough
redeems less than all the debt securities of that series,
Schering-Plough
may block the transfer or exchange of those debt securities
during the period beginning 15 days before the day
Schering-Plough
mails the notice of redemption and ending on the day of that
mailing, in order to freeze the list of holders to prepare the
mailing.
Schering-Plough
may also refuse to register transfers or exchanges of any
certificated securities selected for redemption, except that
Schering-Plough
will continue to permit transfers and exchanges of the
unredeemed portion of any debt security that will be partially
redeemed.
If a registered debt security is issued in global form, only the
depositary will be entitled to transfer and exchange the debt
security as described in this subsection because it will be the
sole holder of the debt security.
Payment and
Paying Agents
On each due date for interest payments on the debt securities,
Schering-Plough
will pay interest to each person shown on the trustees
records as owner of the debt securities at the close of business
on a designated day that is in advance of the due date for
interest.
Schering-Plough
will pay interest to each such person even if such person no
longer owns the debt security on the interest due date. The
designated day on which
Schering-Plough
will determine the owner of the debt security, as shown on the
trustees records, is also known as the record
date. The record date will usually be about two weeks in
advance of the interest due date.
Because
Schering-Plough
will pay interest on the debt securities to the holders of the
debt securities based on ownership as of the applicable record
date with respect to any given interest period, and not to the
holders of the debt securities on the interest due date (that
is, the day that the interest is to be paid), it is up to the
holders who are buying and selling the debt securities to work
out between themselves the appropriate purchase price for the
debt securities. It is common for purchase prices of debt
securities to be adjusted so as to prorate the interest on the
debt securities fairly between the buyer and the seller based on
their respective ownership periods within the applicable
interest period.
Schering-Plough
will make payments on a global security by wire transfer of
immediately available funds directly to the depositary, or its
nominee, and not to any indirect holders who own beneficial
interests in the global security. An indirect holders
right to those payments will be governed by the rules and
practices of the depositary and its participants, as described
under Global Securities above. Any other
payments will be made as set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
If payment on a debt security is due on a day that is not a
business day,
Schering-Plough
will make such payment on the next succeeding business day. The
indenture will provide that such payments will be treated as if
they were made on the original due date for payment. A
postponement of this kind will not result in a default under any
debt security or indenture, and no interest will accrue on the
amount of any payment that is postponed in this manner.
Book-entry and other indirect holders should consult their
banks or brokers for information on how they will receive
payments on their debt securities.
Information
Concerning the Trustee
The trustee, The Bank of New York (BONY), and certain of its
affiliates have in the past and currently do provide banking,
investment and other services to
Schering-Plough.
Those services
19
include acting as a lender under
Schering-Ploughs
revolving credit agreement; trustee under the indenture, dated
as of November 26, 2003, under which
Schering-Plough
issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of
5.3% senior unsecured notes due 2013 and $1.15 billion
aggregate principal amount of 6.5% senior unsecured notes
due 2033; a transfer agent for
Schering-Ploughs
2004 Preferred Stock and its common shares; and providing cash
management services.
Schering-Plough
currently anticipates that BONY may continue to provide similar
services in the future.
Governing
Law
The indenture and the debt securities will be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the law of the State of New York.
Schering-Plough
may sell the securities covered by this prospectus in any of the
following methods:
|
|
|
|
|
through underwriters, dealers or remarketing firms;
|
|
|
|
directly to one or more purchasers, including to a limited
number of institutional purchasers;
|
|
|
|
through agents; or
|
|
|
|
through a combination of any of the methods of sale.
|
Any such dealer or agent, in addition to any underwriter, may be
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act. Any discounts or commissions received by an underwriter,
dealer, remarketing firm or agent on the sale or resale of
securities may be considered by the SEC to be underwriting
discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.
Sale Through
Underwriters
If underwriters are used in the sale of securities, such
securities will be acquired by the underwriters for their own
account and may be resold from time to time in one or more
transactions, including negotiated transactions, at a fixed
public offering price or at varying prices determined at the
time of sale. The securities may be offered to the public either
through underwriting syndicates represented by managing
underwriters or directly by one or more underwriters acting
alone. Unless otherwise set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement, the obligations of the underwriters to purchase the
securities described in the applicable prospectus supplement
will be subject to certain conditions precedent, and the
underwriters will be obligated to purchase all such securities
if any are purchased by them. Any public offering price and any
discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to dealers
may be changed from time to time.
Direct
Sales
The securities may be sold directly by
Schering-Plough.
In the case of securities sold directly by
Schering-Plough,
no underwriters or agents would be involved.
Sale Through
Agents
The securities may be sold through agents designated by
Schering-Plough
from time to time. Any agents involved in the offer or sale of
the securities in respect of which this prospectus is being
delivered, and any commissions payable by
Schering-Plough
to such agents, will be set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement. Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable
prospectus supplement, any such agent will be acting on a best
efforts basis for the period of its appointment.
20
General
Information
The terms of the offering of the securities with respect to
which this prospectus is being delivered will be set forth in
the applicable prospectus supplement and will include among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the type of and terms of the securities offered;
|
|
|
|
the price of the securities;
|
|
|
|
the proceeds to
Schering-Plough
from the sale of the securities;
|
|
|
|
the names of the securities exchanges, if any, on which the
securities are listed;
|
|
|
|
the name of any underwriters, dealers, remarketing firms or
agents and the amount of securities underwritten or purchased by
each of them;
|
|
|
|
any over-allotment options under which underwriters may purchase
additional securities from
Schering-Plough;
|
|
|
|
any underwriting discounts, agency fees or other compensation to
underwriters or agents; and
|
|
|
|
any discounts or concessions which may be allowed or reallowed
or paid to dealers.
|
Agents, dealers, underwriters and remarketing firms may be
entitled, under agreements entered into with
Schering-Plough
to indemnification by
Schering-Plough
against certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under
the Securities Act, or to contribution to payments they may be
required to make in respect thereof.
Agents, dealers, underwriters and remarketing firms may be
customers of, engage in transactions with, or perform services
for
Schering-Plough
or
Schering-Ploughs
subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business.
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, all securities offered by this prospectus, other
than
Schering-Ploughs
common shares, which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange,
will be new issues with no established trading market.
Schering-Plough
may elect to list any series of securities on an exchange, and
in the case of
Schering-Ploughs
common shares, on any additional exchange, but, unless otherwise
specified in the applicable prospectus supplement,
Schering-Plough
shall not be obligated to do so. In addition, underwriters will
not be obligated to make a market in any securities. No
assurance can be given regarding the activity of trading in, or
liquidity of, any securities.
Unless otherwise indicated in a supplement to this prospectus,
McCarter & English, LLP will pass upon the validity of
the securities for
Schering-Plough.
In addition, Susan Ellen Wolf, Esq.,
Schering-Ploughs
Corporate Secretary, will pass upon certain matters related to
this offering. Ms. Wolf is an officer of
Schering-Plough
and beneficially owns common shares and holds options to
purchase additional common shares. Ms. Wolf is eligible to
participate in the
Schering-Plough
Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Schering-Plough
Employees Saving Plan and may receive benefits under those
plans.
The consolidated financial statements, the related financial
statement schedule, and managements report on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
incorporated in this prospectus by reference from
Schering-Ploughs
2006 10-K
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference (which
reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule and include an explanatory paragraph regarding
Schering-Ploughs
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, and SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined
21
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,
(2) express an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment regarding the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and (3) express an unqualified opinion
on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting), and have been so incorporated in reliance upon the
reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
With respect to the unaudited interim financial information for
the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and
June 30, 2007 and 2006, which is incorporated herein by
reference, Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, have applied limited
procedures in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) for a review
of such information. However, as stated in their reports
included in
Schering-Ploughs
first and second
quarter 10-Q,
and incorporated by reference herein, they did not audit and
they do not express an opinion on that interim financial
information. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on their
reports on such information should be restricted in light of the
limited nature of the review procedures applied.
Deloitte & Touche LLP are not subject to the liability
provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for
their reports on the unaudited interim financial information
because those reports are not reports or a
part of the registration statement prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Securities Act.
The combined financial statements of the OBS Group as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, have been
included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG Accountants
N.V., an independent public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus, and upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
22
INDEX
TO OBS GROUP COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
|
|
F-1
OBS
GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
4,5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income/(expense)
|
|
6
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
7
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
7
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income less net
financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
Share of profit of associates
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the OBS Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-2
OBS
GROUP
(Amounts in millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Financial non-current assets:
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments in
associates
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
other investments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from related parties,
net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners net investment
(including cumulative translation reserves)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total invested equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total invested equity and
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-3
OBS
GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
earnings to cash generated from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on divestments
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profit of associates
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in deferred taxes (non-cash
recognized in income)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions expense (non-cash
recognized in income)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense funded by Akzo
Nobel
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate overhead costs funded by
Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense funded by Akzo
Nobel
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment costs funded by
Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow before
changes in working capital and provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805
|
|
(Increase) in trade and other
receivables
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in other
non-current assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in trade and
other payables and provisions
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in income tax
payables and receivables, net
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of interests
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
Dividends paid to Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash transfers (to)/from Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing with affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease)/increase in borrowings
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-4
OBS
GROUP
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN INVESTED
EQUITY
(Amounts in millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners
Net
|
|
Translation
|
|
Minority
|
|
Total Invested
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Reserves
|
|
Interest
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2004
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
Changes in exchange rates in
respect of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(expense) recognized
directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income/(expenses)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Dividend paid to Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
Contributions attributed
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest expense funded
by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Corporate overhead
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Insurance expense
funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Tax transfers from Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Employee benefits and
other non-cash transfers, net
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Cash transfers from
Akzo Nobel, net
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Changes in exchange rates in
respect of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(expense) recognized
directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income/(expenses)
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Dividend paid to Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Contributions attributed
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest expense funded
by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Corporate overhead
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Insurance expense
funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Tax transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
Employee benefits and
other non-cash transfers, net
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Cash transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
Changes in exchange rates in
respect of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(expense) recognized
directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income/(expenses)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Change minority interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Contributions attributed
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest expense funded
by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Corporate overhead
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Insurance expense
funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Tax transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Employee benefits and
other non-cash transfers, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Cash transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined
financial statements.
F-5
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 1 Business
and Basis of Presentation
Business
In these combined financial statements, the human healthcare and
animal healthcare activities of Akzo Nobel N.V. (Akzo
Nobel) are together referred to as the healthcare
activities and references to the OBS Group or
Company mean those operating companies and other
subsidiaries of Akzo Nobel that undertook the human and animal
healthcare activities during the relevant periods covered by the
combined financial statements.
The OBS Group is headquartered in Oss, The Netherlands.
The human healthcare business, Organon, specializes in the
discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of
prescription medicines and products. Its core therapeutic areas
of expertise are contraception, fertility, hormone therapy,
mental health and anesthesia. Additionally, the Organon business
includes Nobilon, a biotechnology company dedicated to exploring
opportunities in the field of human vaccines.
The animal healthcare business, Intervet, offers a full range of
veterinary vaccines and pharmaceuticals for a variety of animal
species including poultry, pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, horses,
cats, dogs and fish.
Following the announcement by Akzo Nobel that it intends to
separate its healthcare activities from Akzo Nobel, Akzo Nobel
incorporated Organon BioSciences N.V. (OBS N.V.) on
September 1, 2006 as a public company with limited
liability (naamloze vennootschap) incorporated under
the laws of The Netherlands with an authorized share capital of
EUR 225 thousand and an issued share capital of EUR 45
thousand.
On September 30, 2006 Akzo Nobel contributed to
OBS N.V., through a contribution in kind, the shares of the
two subholding companies, Organon BioSciences International B.V.
and Organon BioSciences Nederland B.V., in exchange for
24,955,000 ordinary shares of OBS N.V. with a nominal value
of EUR 1.00 (one euro) per share. As per the date of this
contribution, OBS N.V. had an authorized share capital of
EUR 125 million and an issued share capital of
EUR 25 million.
These combined financial statements were authorized on
July 30, 2007 by the Board of Management of the OBS N.V.
F-6
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Basis of
Presentation
These combined financial statements reflect all of the assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows of the OBS
Group. The significant legal entities forming part of the OBS
Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
|
Legal
Entity
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Organon BioSciences N.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon BioSciences Nederland
B.V.(*)
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon BioSciences International
B.V. (**)
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet International B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet International GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet UK Ltd.
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Laboratorios Intervet S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Hydrochemie GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Deutschland GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Innovation GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Akzo Nobel Ltda (***)
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Mexico S.A. de CV
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Productions S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Pharma R&D S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet (Italia) S.r.l.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet UK Production Ltd.
|
|
UK
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Holding B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Nederland B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet KK
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Nobilon International B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
N.V. Organon
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon (Ireland) Ltd. (****)
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon International Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon USA Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Nippon Organon KK
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Laboratories Ltd.
|
|
UK
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Española S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Italia S.p.A.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon do Brasil Indústria e
Comércio Ltda
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Ilaclari A.S.
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Holding B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Nederland B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Multilan AG
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Diosynth RTP Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
F-7
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Formerly Akzo Nobel Pharma B.V. |
|
(**) |
|
Formerly Akzo Nobel Pharma International B.V. |
|
(***) |
|
Represents the Intervet division of Akzo Nobel Ltda, the
combined financial statements only include those assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of this legal
entity that pertain directly to healthcare activities. In June
2006 the Intervet division of this legal entity was incorporated
in a separate entity (Intervet do Brasil Veterinaria Ltda),
which is indirectly 100% owned by OBS N.V. The remaining
business of Akzo Nobel Ltda is not related to healthcare
activities and is not part of the spin-off healthcare activities. |
|
(****) |
|
Including Organon Ireland Swiss Branch. |
These combined financial statements exclude the assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Akzo Nobel
legal entities (and divisions thereof) not relating to the
healthcare activities.
During 2006, the OBS Group divested Crina S.A., one of the
remaining feed additives businesses held in the portfolio.
During 2005, the OBS Group divested significant parts of its
feed additives business to Biovet. In 2004, the OBS Group
divested Dr. Bommeli AG, a business offering diagnostic
reagents and testing kits for the control of livestock diseases.
These combined financial statements reflect the revenues,
expenses, and cash flows of these businesses up to the date of
divestment.
The OBS Group has historically operated as an integrated part of
Akzo Nobel and within the Akzo Nobel infrastructure. However,
these combined financial statements have been prepared on a
carve-out basis from the consolidated financial
statements of Akzo Nobel to represent the financial position and
performance of the OBS Group as if the OBS Group had existed as
of and during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, and as if International Accounting Standard
(IAS) 27, Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements, has been applied throughout. The
combined financial statements included herein may not
necessarily be indicative of the OBS Groups financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows had the OBS Group
operated as a separate entity during the periods presented or
for future periods.
As described above, these combined financial statements reflect
the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows of
the OBS Group. Under the carve-out basis of
presentation, these combined financial statements include
allocations for various expenses, including corporate
administrative expenses, as well as an allocation of certain
assets and liabilities historically maintained by Akzo Nobel,
but not recorded in the accounts of the OBS Group. These
include, among other things, corporate overhead, interest
expense, certain deferred and current income tax assets and
liabilities, liabilities for certain compensation plans and
contingent liabilities. The various allocation methodologies for
corporate expenses, insurance, interest expense, share based
payments, and pension and postretirement expenses are discussed
in Notes 3, 3, 7, 20, and 21, respectively. Management of
the OBS Group considers that such allocations have been made on
a reasonable basis, but may not necessarily be indicative of the
costs that would have been incurred if the OBS Group had
operated on a stand-alone basis.
Akzo Nobel uses a centralized approach to manage cash and to
finance many of its global operations. As a result, certain debt
and cash and cash equivalents maintained at Akzo Nobel are not
included in the accompanying combined financial statements. The
combined statements of income include an allocation of Akzo
Nobels interest expense as discussed in Note 7. The
OBS Groups financing requirements are represented by cash
transactions with Akzo Nobel and are reflected in invested
equity in the combined balance sheets.
F-8
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The invested equity balance in these combined financial
statements of the OBS Group constitutes Akzo Nobels
investment in the OBS Group and represents the excess of total
assets over total liabilities. Invested equity includes the
effects of carve-out allocations from Akzo Nobel and the funding
of the OBS Group through the in-house banking cash pooling
arrangements and loans to and from related parties with Akzo
Nobel, and the OBS Groups cumulative net income, including
income directly recognized in equity. As a consequence, invested
equity does not constitute any contract that evidences a
residual interest in the assets after deducting liabilities to
which reference is made in IAS 32, Financial Statements:
Disclosure and Presentation.
For those OBS Group companies located in countries where they
were included in the tax grouping of other Akzo Nobel entities
within the respective entitys tax jurisdiction, the
current tax payable or receivable of these OBS Group companies
represents the income tax amount to be paid to or to be received
from the country tax leading holding company of Akzo Nobel. For
the purpose of these combined financial statements it is assumed
that only the current year is outstanding.
The combined statements of cash flows have been prepared under
the indirect method in accordance with the requirements of IAS
7, Cash Flow Statements. The combined statements of cash
flows exclude currency translation differences, which arise as a
result of translating the assets and liabilities of non-euro
companies to euros at year-end exchange rates (except for those
arising on cash and cash equivalents) and have been adjusted for
non-cash transactions.
Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group have identified certain issues and
areas that, in preparation of and following the separation,
require mutually agreeable arrangements between them. These
issues and areas have been included in a separation agreement,
which was signed on February 28, 2007. Note 31
provides further explanation on the separation agreement.
As a result of the foregoing, among other things, the combined
financial statements may not necessarily be indicative of the
OBS Groups financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows had the OBS Group operated on a separate stand-alone
basis during the periods presented, or for future periods.
Furthermore, the combined financial statements do not reflect
the financial impact of the actual separation of the OBS Group
from Akzo Nobel.
These combined financial statements of the OBS Group have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRS).
IFRS as adopted by the OBS Group does not differ from IFRS as
provided by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB). The accounting policies as set out below
have been applied consistently in preparing the combined
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, with the exception of IAS 32, Financial
Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and IAS 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement for
financial instruments, which have been applied as from
January 1, 2005. Management has determined that the effect
of not applying IAS 32 and IAS 39 prior to
January 1, 2005 is immaterial.
These combined financial statements are presented in euro, which
is the functional currency of OBS N.V. and the OBS Group. All
amounts are in millions of euros except headcount figures or
unless otherwise stated. IFRS as applied by the OBS Group
differs in certain significant respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(US GAAP). The effects of the application of
US GAAP are discussed in Note 32.
|
|
Note 2
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
A summary of the significant accounting policies used in the
preparation of the accompanying combined financial statements is
presented below.
F-9
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Principles of
combination
These combined financial statements include the accounts of the
OBS Groups operations controlled by Akzo Nobel and have
been combined as if together for all periods presented.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions with
combined entities have been eliminated. However, intercompany
balances and transactions with Akzo Nobel, excluding the OBS
Group, have not been eliminated, but are presented as balances
and transactions with related parties.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS
requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions
that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and
associated assumptions are based on experience and various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the
judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an
ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized
in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision
affects only that period or in the period of the revision and
future periods if the revision affects both current and future
periods.
Judgments made by management in the application of IFRS that
have a significant effect on the combined financial statements
and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in
the next year are discussed in Note 29.
Management has also estimated the allocation of various expenses
and certain assets and liabilities that have historically been
maintained by Akzo Nobel as disclosed in Note 1 and
throughout these combined financial statements.
Foreign
currency translation
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the foreign
exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the
balance sheet date are translated to euro at the foreign
exchange rate ruling at that date. Foreign exchange differences
arising on translation are recognized in the combined statements
of income. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured
in terms of historical costs in a foreign currency are
translated using the exchange rate at the date of the
transaction.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated
into euros at exchange rates on the balance sheet date. Revenues
and expenses are translated into euros at rates approximating
the foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates of the
transactions. Exchange differences resulting from translation
into euros of shareholders equities and of intercompany
loans of a permanent nature with respect to subsidiaries outside
the euro region are recorded within invested equity. Upon
disposal or liquidation of a foreign entity, these cumulative
translation adjustments are recognized as income or expense.
Exchange gains and losses arising from transactions denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity
involved, as well as the fair value adjustment of forward
exchange contracts, are included in the combined statements of
income.
F-10
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Before being combined, the financial statements of subsidiaries
established in hyperinflationary countries are adjusted for the
effects of changing prices.
The main exchange rates against euros used in the preparation of
the combined balance sheets and the combined statements of
income are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Balance
Sheets
|
|
|
Combined
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
1.317
|
|
|
|
1.186
|
|
|
|
1.256
|
|
|
|
1.245
|
|
|
|
1.243
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
0.671
|
|
|
|
0.687
|
|
|
|
0.682
|
|
|
|
0.684
|
|
|
|
0.680
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
1.607
|
|
|
|
1.557
|
|
|
|
1.577
|
|
|
|
1.549
|
|
|
|
1.544
|
|
Valuation
The principles of valuation and determination of income used in
these combined financial statements are based on historical
costs, unless stated otherwise in the principles of valuation of
assets and liabilities.
Property,
plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less
accumulated depreciation and any impairment recognized. The cost
of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials,
direct labor, the initial estimate, where relevant, of the costs
of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on
which they are located, and an appropriate proportion of
production overheads. Interest incurred for the construction of
any qualifying asset is capitalized during the period of time
that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its
intended use. Government grants relating to the purchase of
property, plant and equipment are deducted from the cost of the
related asset.
Subsequent costs are included in an assets carrying amount
or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it
is probable that future economic benefits associated with the
item will flow to the OBS Group and the cost of the item can be
measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged
to the income statement during the financial period in which
they are incurred.
Land is not depreciated. The cost of other property, plant and
equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the respective assets. In the majority
of cases the useful life of equipment and machinery is
10 years and the useful lives of buildings ranges between
20 and 30 years. Residual value is in the majority of cases
determined to be insignificant. Depreciation methods, useful
lives and residual values are reassessed annually.
Components of property, plant and equipment that have different
useful lives are accounted for as separate items of property,
plant and equipment.
Gains and losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment
are included in the combined statements of income.
F-11
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Leases
Leases of property, plant and equipment are classified as
finance leases if the OBS Group has substantially all the risks
and rewards of ownership. All other leases are accounted for as
operating leases.
Finance leases are capitalized at the commencement of the lease
at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the
present value of the minimum lease payments. Each lease payment
is apportioned to interest expense and a reduction of the lease
liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the
remaining balance of the liability. Property, plant and
equipment acquired under finance leases are depreciated over the
shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition
over the fair value of the OBS Groups share of the net
identifiable assets at the date of acquisition. Goodwill related
to an associate is included in the carrying amount of the
investment. Separately recognized goodwill is carried at cost
less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the
disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill
relating to the entity sold.
Other
intangible assets
Intangible assets with a finite life, such as licenses, know-how
and intellectual property rights, are capitalized at historic
cost, less accumulated amortization and any impairment
recognized. Amortization is recognized in the combined
statements of income on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives, which in the majority of cases are between 4 and
15 years.
Research and
development costs
Expenditures on research and development activities, undertaken
with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical
knowledge and understanding are recognized in the combined
income statements as an expense as incurred. An intangible
asset, however, is recognized if the OBS Group can demonstrate
all of the following: (a) the technical feasibility of
completing the product or process so that it will be available
for use or sale; (b) its intention to complete the product
or process and use or sell it;(c) its ability to use or sell
product or process; (d) how the product or process will
generate probable future economic benefits and demonstrate the
existence of a market for the product or process; (e) the
availability of adequate technical, financial and other
resources to complete the development and to use or sell the
product or process; and (f) its ability to reliably measure
the expenditure attributable to the product or process during
its development. Where the recognition criteria are met,
capitalized development expenditure is stated at cost less
accumulated amortization and impairment losses. The capitalized
development expenditure is amortized on a straight-line basis
over its useful economic life. The expenditure capitalized
includes the cost of materials, direct labor and an appropriate
proportion of overheads.
A development project involves a product candidate undergoing a
high number of tests to illustrate its safety profile and the
effect on human beings and animals prior to obtaining the
necessary approval of the final product from the appropriate
authorities. The future economic benefits associated with the
individual development projects are dependent on obtaining such
approval. Considering the general risk related to the
development of pharmaceutical products, management has concluded
that the future economic benefits associated with the individual
projects cannot be
F-12
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
estimated with sufficient certainty until the project has been
finalized nor is the OBS Group technically feasible to bring the
product to the market if it lacks the required regulatory
approval. Development costs that meet the conditions mentioned
above are capitalized; when these conditions are not met, all
development costs are expensed as incurred. For the years prior
to and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, the OBS Group has expensed all development costs.
Payments to in-license products and compounds from third
parties, generally taking the form of up-front payments and
milestones, are capitalized at historic cost and are recognized
on a straight-line basis, over their useful lives.
Financial
non-current assets
Interests in companies where the OBS Group can exercise
significant influence but no control are treated as investments
in associates and are stated at the amount of the OBS
Groups share in equity from the date that significant
influence commences until the date that significant influence
ceases. The calculation of equity is based on IFRS as disclosed
in these notes to the combined financial statements. When the
share of losses exceeds the interest in the associate, the
carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of future
losses is discontinued, unless the OBS Group has incurred legal
or constructive obligations on behalf of the associate.
Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates are
eliminated to the extent of the OBS Groups interest in the
associate and are eliminated against the investment in the
company. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as
unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no
evidence of impairment.
Other financial non-current assets classified as available for
sale are stated at fair value, with gains and losses resulting
from changes in the fair value recognized directly in invested
equity and impairment losses recognized in the combined
statement of income. Upon derecognition of financial non-current
assets classified as available for sale, the cumulative gain or
loss previously recognized directly in equity is recognized in
the combined statements of income. Other financial non-current
assets classified as held to maturity are stated at amortized
cost less impairment losses. Long-term receivables and loans to
associates included within other financial non-current assets
are carried at amortized cost (using the effective interest
method), less impairment losses.
The fair value of financial instruments classified as available
for sale is their quoted price at the balance sheet date.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable
value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in
the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of
completion and selling expenses.
The cost of inventories is determined using the weighted average
cost formula, and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the
inventories and bringing them to their existing location and
condition. In the case of manufactured inventories and work in
progress, cost includes direct material and direct labor costs
and certain overhead and production expenses.
Trade and
other receivables
Trade and other receivables are stated at their amortized cost
less impairment losses. Collectibility of accounts receivable is
regularly reviewed and is based upon managements knowledge
of customers and compliance with credit terms.
F-13
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments
that are readily convertible into cash and have original
maturities of three months or less. The OBS Groups
reported cash and cash equivalents relate to local cash on hand
or local cash in bank accounts of legal entities of the OBS
Group. As discussed in Note 1 and Note 3 during the
periods covered by these combined financial statements, treasury
activities at Akzo Nobel were generally centralized such that
cash collections by the OBS Group were automatically remitted to
Akzo Nobel. Amounts remitted to Akzo Nobel are not included in
cash and cash equivalents.
Impairment
The carrying amount of the OBS Groups assets, other than
inventories and deferred tax assets are reviewed at each balance
sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of
impairment. If any such indication exists, the assets
recoverable amount is estimated. An impairment charge is
recognized if the book value so computed exceeds the recoverable
amount of the assets.
For goodwill, assets that have an indefinite life and intangible
assets that are not yet available for use, the recoverable
amount is estimated at each balance sheet date.
An impairment loss is recognized whenever the carrying amount of
an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable
amount. Impairment losses are recognized in the combined
statements of income.
Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units
are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to cash-generating units (group of units) and
then, to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the
unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
When a decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale
financial asset has been recognized directly in invested equity
and there is subsequent objective evidence that the asset is
impaired, the cumulative loss that had been recognized directly
in invested equity is recognized in profit or loss even though
the financial asset has not been derecognized. The amount of the
cumulative loss that is recognized in profit and loss is the
difference between the acquisition cost and current fair value,
less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously
recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss in respect of a held-to-maturity security or
receivable carried at amortised cost is reversed if the
subsequent increase in recoverable amount can be related
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was
recognized.
An impairment loss in respect of an investment in an equity
instrument classified as available for sale is not reversed
through profit or loss. If the fair value of a debt instrument
classified as available-for-sale increases and the increase can
be objectively related to an event occurring after the
impairment loss was recognized in profit or loss, the impairment
loss shall be reversed, with the amount of the reversal
recognized in profit or loss.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed.
In respect of other assets, an impairment loss is reversed if
there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the
recoverable amount.
An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the
assets carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount
that would have been determined, net of depreciation or
amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
F-14
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Invested
equity
The invested equity balance in the combined financial statements
of the OBS Group constitutes Akzo Nobels investment in the
OBS Group and represents the excess of total assets over total
liabilities. Invested equity includes the effects of carve-out
allocations from Akzo Nobel and the funding of the OBS Group
activities through the in-house banking and cash pooling loans
to and from related parties with Akzo Nobel, and the OBS
Groups cumulative net income, including income directly
recognized in equity. As a consequence, invested equity does not
constitute any contract that evidences a residual interest in
the assets after deducting liabilities.
Provisions
Provisions are recorded when the OBS Group has a present legal
or constructive obligation as a result of past events that can
be measured reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of
economic benefits is required to settle that obligation.
Provisions are stated at net present value, taking the timing of
cash outflows into account. The expected future cash outflows
are discounted using appropriate pre-tax interest rates
reflecting current market assessments of the time value of money
and, if applicable, the risks specific to the liability. The
accretion of the discount element of provisions as a result of
the passage of time is recognized in the combined statements of
income under financing expenses.
A provision for restructuring is recognized when a detailed and
formal restructuring plan has been approved, and the
restructuring has either commenced or has been announced
publicly committing the OBS Group to that course of action.
Future operating costs are not provided for.
Pensions and
other postretirement benefits
The majority of the OBS Groups employees participate in
Akzo Nobel defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans which
provide benefits to employees and former employees of both the
OBS Group and other Akzo Nobel businesses. In these plans, the
assets and liabilities that relate to employees (and former
employees) of the OBS Group are combined with those related to
employees (and former employees) of other Akzo Nobel businesses.
In preparing the combined financial statements the OBS Group
management used a reasonable allocation methodology to determine
the OBS Groups portion of the plans assets,
liabilities, and benefit costs under IAS 19. See Note 21
for further details of the allocation methodology used.
Furthermore, some OBS Group employees participate in stand-alone
OBS Group pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The
related expenses, assets and liabilities for these plans are
accounted for in the combined financial statements in accordance
with IAS 19.
The OBS Groups net obligation in respect of defined
benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by
estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have
earned in return for their service in the current and prior
periods; that benefit is discounted to determine its present
value, and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The
discount rate is the yield at the balance sheet date on high
quality corporate bonds that have currencies and terms
consistent with the currencies and estimated terms of the
obligation. Most of the defined benefit pension plans are funded
with plan assets that have been segregated in trusts or
foundations. Valuations of both funded and unfunded plans are
carried out by independent actuaries using the projected unit
credit method. Pension costs primarily represent the increase in
the actuarial present value of the obligation for
F-15
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
projected pension benefits based on employee service during the
year and the interest on this obligation in respect of employee
service in previous years, net of the expected return on plan
assets.
In certain countries the OBS Group also provides postretirement
benefits other than pensions to its employees. These plans are
generally not funded. Valuations of the obligations under these
plans are carried out by independent actuaries using the
projected unit credit method. The costs relating to such plans
primarily consist of the present value of the benefits
attributed on an equal basis to each year of service and the
interest on this obligation in respect of employee service in
previous years.
Actuarial gains and losses arising in calculating the OBS
Groups obligation in respect of a plan are recognized to
the extent that any cumulative unrecognized actuarial gain or
loss exceeds ten percent of the greater of the present value of
the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan
assets. That portion is recognized in the combined statements of
income over the expected average remaining working lives of the
employees participating in the plan, otherwise actuarial gains
and losses are not recognized.
When the benefits of a plan are improved, the portion of the
increased benefit relating to past service by employees is
recognized as an expense in the combined statements of income on
a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits
become vested. To the extent that the benefits vest immediately,
the expense is recognized immediately in the combined statements
of income.
Other
long-term employee benefits
Other long-term employee benefits include long-service or
sabbatical leave, jubilee or other long-service benefits, and
other employee benefits payable more than 12 months after
the related service rendered. These provisions are stated at
present value.
Defined
contribution plans
For defined contribution plans, the OBS Group has no further
payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.
Accordingly, the contributions made are expensed as incurred.
Income
taxes
During the periods presented, some entities of the OBS Group
businesses did not file separate income tax returns as these
entities were included in the tax grouping of other Akzo Nobel
entities within the respective entitys tax jurisdiction.
The income tax provision included in the combined financial
statements was calculated on a separate return basis, as if the
OBS Group was a separate taxpayer.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on temporary
differences between the valuation of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the valuation for tax purposes.
Measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities is based upon
the enacted or substantially enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred
taxes are not discounted. The tax effect on the elimination of
intercompany profit in inventories is based on the tax rate of
the country of the company receiving the goods.
Deferred tax assets, including assets arising from losses
carried forward, are recognized if it is probable that future
taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be
used. Non-refundable dividend taxes are taken into account in
the determination of provisions for deferred taxes
F-16
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
to the extent of earnings expected to be distributed by
associates. If separate tax rates exist for distributed and
undistributed profits, the current and deferred taxes are
measured at the tax rate applicable to undistributed profits.
The income tax consequences of dividends are recognized when a
liability to pay the dividend is recognized.
Deferred taxes are not recognized for the following temporary
differences: the initial recognition of goodwill, the initial
recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither
accounting nor taxable profit and differences relating to
investments in subsidiaries to the extent it is probable that
the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable
future.
The OBS Group does not recognize deferred tax on differences
between tax base and book value of investment in subsidiaries
where reversal is controlled and not anticipated in the
foreseeable future.
Taxes on income comprise both current and deferred taxes,
including effects of changes in tax rates. Income tax is
recognized in the combined statements of income, unless it
relates to equity and deferred tax recognized in purchase
accounting.
Share-based
payments
Certain OBS Group employees participate in various Akzo Nobel
share-based payment plans. These stock option plans allow
certain employees of the OBS Group to acquire Akzo Nobel N.V.
common shares. These options generally vest if the employee
stays with the OBS Group during an uninterrupted three-year
period. Also, for the options granted since 2005, certain
economic value added performance criteria are included in the
vesting conditions. Akzo Nobel also has a Performance Share
Plan, under which shares are conditionally granted to certain
employees. The actual number of shares which the employees will
receive depends on the employee having stayed with the OBS Group
during an uninterrupted three-year period and Akzo Nobels
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance over a three-year
period, compared with TSR performance of a specified peer group.
The fair value of the options and performance shares granted is
recognized as an employee expense with a corresponding increase
in invested equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and
spread over the period during which the employees become
unconditionally entitled to the options or performance shares.
The fair value of the options and performance shares granted to
OBS Group employees and to board members is measured using a
binomial lattice model, taking into account the terms and
conditions upon which the options and performance shares were
granted. For the performance shares this also includes the
market conditions expected to impact Akzo Nobels TSR
performance in relation to the selected peers. The amount
recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual
number of options or performance shares that vest, except where
forfeiture or extra vesting of performance shares is only due to
the actual TSR performance differing from the performance
anticipated at the grant date of the performance shares.
Borrowings
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair value. Subsequent to
initial recognition, borrowings are stated at amortized cost
with any difference between cost and redemption value being
recognized in the combined statements of income over the period
of the borrowings on an effective interest basis.
Short-term
debt and trade and other payables
Short-term debt, trade payables and other payables are
recognized at cost. Their carrying values approximate their cost
because of the short term maturity of these instruments.
F-17
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Derivative
financial instruments
The OBS Group uses forward foreign currency contracts in order
to manage its exposures to movements in foreign exchange rates.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years then
ended, forward exchange contracts are measured at fair value in
the combined balance sheets, with changes in the fair value
recognized in income. The fair values are recognized in the
combined balance sheets under trade and other receivables or
under trade and other payables.
Principles of
determination of income
The determination of income is closely associated with the
valuation of assets and liabilities. In addition, the following
principles are observed in the preparation of the combined
statements of income:
Revenues
Revenues are defined as the consideration received from the sale
and delivery of goods and services and royalty income. Revenues
are shown net of value-added-tax, rebates, discounts and similar
allowances.
Revenues from sales of goods are recognized when the significant
risks and rewards have been transferred to a third party. No
revenue is recognized if there are significant uncertainties
regarding the recovery of the consideration due, associated
cost, or the possible return of goods, or if management keeps
continuing involvement with the goods. Service revenues are
recognized as services are rendered. Royalty income is
recognized on an accrual basis.
The OBS Group receives in-licensing, milestone, and other
up-front non-refundable payments from third-parties relating to
the sale or licensing of products or technology. Revenue
associated with performance milestones is recognized based on
achievement of the milestones, as defined in the respective
agreements. Revenue from non-refundable up-front payments and
license fees is initially reported as deferred income and is
recognized in income as earned over the period of the
development collaboration or the manufacturing obligation.
The OBS Group also generates revenues from collaborative
research and development as well as co-promotion arrangements.
Such agreements may consist of multiple elements and provide for
varying consideration terms, such as up-front, milestone and
similar payments, which require significant analysis by
management in order to determine the appropriate method of
revenue recognition. Where an arrangement can be divided into
separate units of accounting (each unit constituting a separate
earnings process), the arrangement consideration is allocated to
the different units based on their relative fair values and
recognized over the respective performance period. Where the
arrangement cannot be divided into separate units, the
individual deliverables are combined as a single unit of
accounting and the total arrangement consideration is recognized
over the estimated collaboration period.
The OBS Group has accruals and provisions for expected sales
returns, charge-backs, discounts and other rebates that are
recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the related
revenues are recorded. Such estimates are based on analyses of
existing contractual or legislatively mandated obligations,
historical trends and the OBS Groups experience.
Management believes that the total accruals and provisions for
these items are adequate, based upon currently available
information. As these reductions are based on management
estimates, they may be subject to change as better information
becomes available. Such changes that arise could impact the
accruals and provisions
F-18
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
recognized in the balance sheet in future periods and
consequently the level of sales recognized in the combined
statements of income in future periods.
Cost of
sales
Cost of sales comprise the manufacturing costs of the goods sold
and delivered, and any inventory write-downs to lower net
realizable value.
Manufacturing costs include such items as:
|
|
|
|
|
the costs of raw materials and supplies, energy, and other
materials;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and the costs of maintenance of the assets used in
production;
|
|
|
|
salaries, wages, and social charges for the personnel involved
in manufacturing.
|
The costs of services and royalties, generally, are included in
the functional cost lines in the combined statements of income,
as applicable: selling and distribution expenses, research and
development expenses, or general and administrative expenses.
Government
grants
Government grants related to cost are recognized in the combined
statements of income in the same periods as the related cost to
be compensated and are deducted from the relevant cost. For
government grants related to assets, see the accounting policy
for property, plant and equipment.
Financial
expenses and income
Financial expenses comprise the interest expense on advances
from Akzo Nobel based on the daily outstanding advances funded
to the OBS Group through Akzo Nobels cash pooling accounts
using interest rates applicable to the currency and region of
the cash pooling accounts and interest expense on borrowings
from the Akzo Nobel Group, and borrowings from financial
institutions, calculated using the effective interest method.
Also the interest expense component of finance lease payments
and the accretion of the discount element of provisions as a
result of the passage of time are recognized under financial
expenses.
Interest income is recognized under financial income, using the
effective interest method.
Share of
profit of associates
Share in profit of associates consists of the OBS Groups
share in earnings of these companies and interest on loans
granted to them, with an allowance being made for taxes relating
to these items.
Earnings per
share
The OBS Group is not a separate legal entity with common shares
outstanding. Therefore, historical earnings per share have not
been presented in the combined financial statements.
Segment
reporting
The primary segment reporting is based on the business segments
of the OBS Group, whereby the business segments are engaged in
providing products or services which are subject to risks and
rewards which differ from the risks and rewards of the other
segments. In determining whether products and services are
related, aspects such as the nature of the products or services,
the nature of the production processes, and the type or class of
customers and end users for the products or
F-19
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
services are taken into consideration. Segments reported are
Organon and Intervet, which also reflect the management
structure of the OBS Group. The secondary segment reporting is
based on the geographical areas in which the OBS Group operates,
whereby economic environments with comparable risks and returns
are grouped together. Inter-segment pricing is determined on an
arms length basis.
Standards
issued, but not yet effective
The following new IFRS standards and interpretations have been
adopted by the IASB and have been endorsed by the European
Commission. The effective date of these standards and
interpretations is annual periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2007: IFRS 7, Financial Instruments:
Disclosures and Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements: Capital Disclosures, IFRS 8, Operating
Segments, IFRIC Interpretation 8, Scope of IFRS
2 Share Based Payment; IFRIC Interpretation 9,
Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives; IFRIC
Interpretation 10, Interim Financial Reporting and
Impairment; IFRIC 11, IFRS 2, Group and Treasury Share
Transactions; IFRIC 12, Service Concession
Arrangements; IFRIC 13, Customer Loyalty Programmes,
and IFRIC 14, IAS 19 The Limit on a Defined
Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their
Interaction. The OBS Group has analyzed the impact of the
new accounting standards on the combined financial statements,
and they are not expected to have a significant impact on the
OBS Group.
Note 3 Related
Parties
These combined financial statements include transactions with
related parties. The OBS Group entered into transactions with
Akzo Nobel and its subsidiaries. Furthermore, Akzo Nobel
provided corporate services for the combined financial statement
periods presented. Management believes that product transfers
between the OBS Group and the Akzo Nobel Group were made at
arms length prices.
Sales and purchases of goods and services to and from Akzo Nobel
and its subsidiaries were not significant for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, the OBS Group had receivables from Akzo Nobel and its
subsidiaries of EUR 11 million and
EUR 6 million, respectively. These amounts are
reflected in receivables from related parties in the combined
balance sheets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the OBS
Group had payables to Akzo Nobel and its subsidiaries of
EUR 5 million and EUR 7 million,
respectively. These amounts are reflected in payables to related
parties in the combined balance sheets.
In addition, the OBS Group purchases and sells goods and
services to two related parties in which the OBS Group holds
less than a 50% equity interest (associates). Such transactions
were not significant on an individual or aggregate basis. The
OBS Group believes these transactions were conducted at
arms length with terms comparable to transactions with
third parties.
General and administrative expenses include allocated corporate
and regional costs from Akzo Nobel approximating
EUR 30 million, EUR 27 million and
EUR 24 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These costs are primarily
related to Akzo Nobels corporate administrative services
to the OBS Group, and are generally allocated based on a
combination of the ratio of the OBS Groups annual
revenues, gross profit, and property, plant, and equipment, to
Akzo Nobels comparable consolidated revenues, gross
profit, and property, plant, and equipment. Management considers
that such allocations have been made on a reasonable basis, but
may not necessarily be indicative of the costs had the OBS Group
operated as a separate entity during the periods presented. In
addition, Akzo Nobel has incurred specific costs that are
directly related to the OBS Group. These have been allocated to
the OBS Group based upon actual costs
F-20
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
incurred by Akzo Nobel. For the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, these direct related expenses amounted to
EUR 3 million, EUR 2 million and
EUR 2 million, respectively.
Akzo Nobel incurs certain insurance costs on behalf of the OBS
Group. These costs primarily include insurance premiums, costs
related to insurance claims and certain administrative
(insurance) services. Akzo Nobels in-house insurance
department acts as an in-house insurer that incurs the risk
partially by themselves as well as insuring risk partially with
third party insurance companies. For the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, Akzo Nobel has allocated
EUR 28 million, EUR 29 million and
EUR 27 million to the OBS Group for total insurance
expenses, respectively. These costs have been allocated based on
the risk profiles of the OBS Group compared to the risk profiles
of other Akzo Nobel businesses. The risk profiles used are based
on the nature and operations of the various subsidiaries that
are included in the OBS Group. Management considers that such
allocations have been made on a reasonable basis, but may not
necessarily be indicative of the costs had the OBS Group
operated as a separate entity during the periods presented.
In some countries, OBS Group entities form part of a fiscal
unity headed by an Akzo Nobel company. In these instances, the
tax leading company files the tax return and settles the taxes
with the respective OBS Group company in that country. Income
tax provisions related to the above mentioned OBS Group
companies were calculated using a method as if these OBS Group
companies had filed a separate tax return.
Akzo Nobel uses a centralized approach for cash management and
to finance its operations. During the periods covered by these
combined financial statements, cash deposits were remitted to
Akzo Nobel on a regular basis and are reflected within invested
equity in the combined balance sheets. Similarly, the OBS
Groups cash disbursements were funded through Akzo
Nobels cash accounts. As a result, none of Akzo
Nobels cash, cash equivalents or liabilities pertaining to
book overdrafts have been allocated to the OBS Group in the
combined financial statements. All cash and cash equivalents
reflected in these combined financial statements belong to legal
entities of the OBS Group.
The OBS Groups combined statements of income also include
an allocation of Akzo Nobels interest expense totaling
EUR 38 million, EUR 28 million and
EUR 19 million, for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These costs are primarily
related to Akzo Nobels consolidated interest expense and
are allocated principally based on the daily average outstanding
cash balance funded to the OBS Group through Akzo Nobels
cash accounts using a rate applicable to the underlying
currency. While interest expense has been allocated, there is no
debt specific to the OBS Group; therefore, no allocation of Akzo
Nobels general corporate debt has been made in the
accompanying combined balance sheets as all transactions with
Akzo Nobel are settled via invested equity.
In addition, the OBS Group enters into derivative contracts with
Akzo Nobel to manage its foreign currency risk. At
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, outstanding contracts to
buy currencies had notional values of EUR 21 million,
EUR 43 million and EUR 64 million, respectively,
while contracts to sell currencies had notional values of
EUR 57 million, EUR 43 million and
EUR 30 million, respectively.
Additionally, the OBS Group has various loan receivables
with the Akzo Nobel Group, which are included in invested equity
in the combined balance sheets. These loans bear interest at
rates ranging from 3.9% to 4.0% in 2006 and 4.0% to 4.5% in
2005. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, invested equity
includes EUR 289 million and EUR 28 million,
respectively, of net loans due from and due to related parties.
In addition, the OBS Group recognized interest income on these
loans in the amount
F-21
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
of EUR 7 million, EUR 5 million and
EUR 8 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In the ordinary course of business the OBS Group has
transactions with various organizations with which certain of
its members of the Board of Management are associated, but no
transactions in respect of this item were conducted in 2006,
2005 or 2004. Likewise, there have been no transactions with
members of the Board of Management, any other senior management
personnel or any family member of such persons. Also no loans
have been extended to members of the Board of Management, any
other senior management personnel or any family member of such
persons. Certain members of the OBS Groups Board of
Management are also members of Akzo Nobels Board of
Management.
Key management
salary, bonus and other emoluments
The key management compensation included in the table below,
relates only to 12, 10 and 9 OBS Group Executive Committee
members that were in place during 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The management compensation of the CFO, who joined
the OBS Group on November 1, 2006, is included for
2 months in 2006. In addition, Akzo Nobel has allocated a
portion of other key management personnel compensation as a part
of the allocation of corporate and regional costs as described
above, which has been excluded from the amounts below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(EUR
000s)
|
|
|
Salaries and other short-term
employee benefits
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
4,842
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
Other emoluments
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
6,329
|
|
|
|
4,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR 1 million, EUR 1 million and nil of
share-based payment costs related to the performance share plan
are included in salaries and other short-term employee benefits
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Guarantees
received
Akzo Nobel has declared in writing that it accepts joint and
several liability for contractual debts of certain Dutch OBS
Group companies included in these combined financial statements.
These debts, provisions and payables, at December 31, 2006
and 2005, aggregating to EUR 221 million and
EUR 223 million respectively, are included in the
combined balance sheets. Additionally, guarantees were issued by
Akzo Nobel on behalf of the OBS Group companies in the amount of
EUR 252 million and EUR 225 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively, including
guarantees issued by Akzo Nobel in relation to the exemption of
certain Irish companies, under section 5(c) of the
Companies (Amendment) Act 1986 Ireland.
Note 4 Segment
Information
Segment information is presented in respect of the OBS
Groups business and geographical segments. The primary
segment reporting is based on the business segments of the OBS
Group, whereby the business segments are engaged in providing
products or services which are subject to risks and rewards
which differ from the risks and rewards of the other segments.
In determining whether products and services are related,
aspects such as the nature of the products or services,
F-22
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
the nature of the production processes, and the type or class of
customers and end users for the products or services, are taken
into consideration. Segments reported are Organon and Intervet,
which reflects the management structure of the OBS Group. The
secondary segment reporting is based on the geographical areas
in which the OBS Group operates, whereby segment revenue is
based on the geographical location of customers and segment
assets are based on the geographical location of the assets.
The identification of segments is based on the way the business
units are currently managed (composition of management teams and
responsibilities) as well as the content of management
information used to allocate resources within the business
units. The risks and rates of return are affected predominantly
by differences in its businesses, Organon and Intervet, and not
by the fact that the OBS Group operates in different countries.
Segment revenues and results, assets and liabilities include
items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that
can be allocated on a reasonable basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of
Profit
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
|
|
|
|
Third
Parties
|
|
|
Group
Revenues
|
|
|
Operating
Income
|
|
|
of
Associates
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Organon
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Intervet
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Invest-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
|
ments in
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Associates
|
|
|
Expenditures
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Organon
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Intervet
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by
Destination
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other regions
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 5 Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Product sales
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Service revenue
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Royalty and license income
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Other
Operating Income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Results on sale of redundant assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Currency exchange differences
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Results on divestments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, the asset impairments mainly relate to Organons
active pharmaceutical ingredients activities, which were under
pressure from difficult market circumstances, leading to a
pre-tax impairment charge related to property, plant and
equipment and goodwill of EUR 68 million. In addition,
certain other licenses were considered to be impaired by
EUR 5 million.
In 2006, the results on divestments of EUR 6 million
relate to the gain on Intervets divestment of one of its
feed additives businesses, Crina S.A. In 2005, Crina, located in
Gland, Switzerland had annual sales of EUR 6 million
and employed 19 people. Crina specialized in digestibility
modulators based on blends of essential oils. In 2005, the OBS
Group sold significant parts of its Intervet feed additives
business, including the product rights, to Biovet for
EUR 23 million cash and a pre-tax gain of
EUR 21 million was recorded. In 2004, the OBS Group
sold Dr. Bommeli AG for EUR 13 million cash and a
pre-tax gain of EUR 11 million was recorded.
In 2006, the other items primarily relate to a termination
payment from Ligand regarding Avinza (EUR 8 million). In
2005, the other items primarily relate to the early termination
of the
Risperdal®
co-promotion
agreement with Janssen (a subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson) (EUR 149 million), the settlement with
Duramed/Barr on
Mircette®
on their alleged patent infringement (EUR 66 million), the
early entrance fee for a marketing license for
Remeron®
in Germany (EUR 10 million). In 2004, the other items
primarily relate to the full transfer of
Arixtra®
to Sanofi-Synthélabo (EUR 54 million), the early
entrance fee for a marketing license for
Remeron®
in Germany (EUR 18 million), an insurance receipt (EUR
10 million), and a legal settlement (EUR 16 million).
Note 7 Financial
Expense and Income
Akzo Nobel uses a centralized approach for cash management and
to finance its operations. During the periods covered by these
combined financial statements, cash deposits were remitted to
Akzo Nobel on a regular basis and are reflected within invested
equity in the combined balance sheets. Similarly, the OBS
Groups cash disbursements were funded through Akzo
Nobels cash accounts.
Interest allocations from Akzo Nobel are allocated principally
based on the daily average outstanding cash balance funded to
the OBS Group through Akzo Nobels cash accounts using a
rate
F-24
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
applicable to the underlying currency, which ranges from 1.0% to
7.7% for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, interest expense of EUR 38 million,
EUR 28 million and EUR 19 million has been
allocated to the OBS Group. Further, interest income on advances
to other Akzo Nobel entities totaled EUR 7 million,
EUR 5 million, and EUR 8 million for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Management has determined that no debt maintained at the Akzo
Nobel group level is related specifically or entirely to the OBS
Group business, nor does the OBS Group guarantee or pledge its
assets as collateral for Akzo Nobels debt. As such,
management believes that there is no need to pushdown debt to
the combined financial statements of the OBS Group.
Nevertheless, as described above, interest expense has been
allocated and reflected in the combined financial statements of
the OBS Group because the OBS Group did receive advances from
Akzo Nobel.
The Organon BioSciences Group also has borrowings in which it
directly enters into arrangements with third parties or Akzo
Nobel. Any third party obligations are reflected in the OBS
Groups combined financial statements as a liability. Loans
from and to Akzo Nobel are included in invested equity. The
actual interest expense incurred in conjunction with these
borrowings has been reflected in the combined statements of
income.
Financial expense and income consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses
related parties
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expenses other
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
related parties
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Interest expense is reduced by EUR 1 million,
EUR 1 million and EUR 3 million for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
due to interest capitalized on capital investment projects under
construction.
Following the separation of the OBS Group from Akzo Nobel, the
financial expenses and income as stated above may not be
indicative of those expected in the future. See Note 31 for
further discussion of the separation of the OBS Group from Akzo
Nobel.
Profit before tax amounted to EUR 550 million,
EUR 697 million and EUR 516 million for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.
Tax (charges)/benefits are included in the combined statements
of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Tax on operating income less
financing costs
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
F-25
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The classification of current tax (charges)/benefits in the
combined statements of income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Current tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the year
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for prior
years
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Deferred tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
origination and
reversal of temporary differences
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
tax losses not
recognized
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
The reconciliation of the statutory tax rate in The Netherlands
to the effective combined tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Statutory tax rate in The
Netherlands
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Effect of different tax rates in
foreign countries
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Tax-exempt income/non-deductible
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Adjustments for prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Note 9 Salaries,
Wages, and Social Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Pension and other postretirement
costs
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Other social charges
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
Pension and other postretirement costs for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 excludes the effect of
EUR 29 million and EUR 92 million,
respectively, relating to changes in the pension and
postretirement plans in the US and Canada in 2006, and The
Netherlands in 2005. Charges of EUR 5 million,
EUR 3 million and EUR 4 million for
share-based compensation are included in salaries and wages for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of employees
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Organon
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
|
14,700
|
|
Intervet
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,400
|
|
|
|
19,500
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Number of employees at December 31
|
|
|
19,200
|
|
|
|
19,400
|
|
|
|
19,390
|
|
The average number of employees working outside The Netherlands
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
13,700, 14,000 and 14,500 respectively.
F-26
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 10 Property,
Plant and Equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
in
|
|
Assets Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
|
|
Progress and
|
|
Used in the
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
Other
|
|
Prepayments
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Total
|
|
and
Land
|
|
Machinery
|
|
Equipment
|
|
on
Projects
|
|
Process
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of acquisition
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Depreciation/impairment
|
|
|
(1,224
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Changes in book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Transfer between categories
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of acquisition
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Depreciation/impairment
|
|
|
(1,363
|
)
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Changes in book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions through business
combinations
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestures
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Transfer between categories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of acquisition
|
|
|
2,502
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Depreciation/impairment
|
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
In cases where the book value of an asset exceeds the
recoverable amount, an impairment charge is recognized. In 2005,
such a charge was recognized in other operating income/(expense)
in the combined statements of income.
In 2005, an impairment charge totaling EUR 53 million
was recognized. The impairments mainly relate to Organons
active pharmaceutical ingredients activities, which was the
result of difficult market circumstances. The recoverable amount
of the business was calculated by determining the value in use,
using discount rates in the range of 8% to 16% reflecting the
risk specific to the assets.
The book value of property, plant and equipment financed by
installment buying and leasing, and not legally owned by the OBS
Group was EUR 40 million and EUR 48 million
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment totaled
EUR 69 million at December 31, 2006. At
December 31, 2005, these commitments totaled
EUR 35 million.
Both at December 31, 2006 and 2005, no item of property,
plant and equipment was registered as security for bank loans.
F-27
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 11
Intangible Assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses,
Software,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Know-how, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Property
Rights
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Amortization/impairment
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Changes in book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Impairments
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Amortization/impairment
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Changes in book value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Amortization/impairment
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
The amortization and impairment charges on intangible assets
have been recognized on the following line items in the combined
statements of income for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Impairment tests are performed for all cash generating units
containing goodwill at each balance sheet date or whenever there
is an indication of impairment. Intangibles with an indefinite
useful life are tested annually for impairment. For all other
intangible assets, an impairment test is performed whenever an
indicator of impairment exists. Impairments of intangible assets
of EUR 20 million in
F-28
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
2005 mainly relate to Organons active pharmaceutical
ingredients activities. The estimates of the recoverable amounts
were calculated by determining the value in use, using discount
rates in the range of 8% to 16% reflecting the risk specific to
the assets.
Note 12
Financial non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
in
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
Associates
|
|
Investments
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2005
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Acquisitions/loans
granted/investments
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Divestures/repayments
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Amounts recognized as
income/(expense)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Transfers from Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Acquisitions/loans
granted/investments
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Divestures/repayments
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Amounts recognized as
income/(expense)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Transfers from Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
Further details on deferred tax assets are provided in
Note 13.
Investments in
associates
The investments in associates at December 31, 2006 include
a loan to an associate of EUR 3 million. Further
details on investments in associates are provided in
Note 14.
Other
investments
Other investments at December 31, 2006 and 2005 include
long-term receivables totaling EUR 61 million and
EUR 69 million, respectively, and other financial
fixed assets totaling EUR 35 million and
EUR 42 million, respectively.
The long-term receivables at December 31, 2006 and 2005
include a subordinated loan of EUR 33 million granted
by Akzo Nobel to the Akzo Nobel Pension Fund in The Netherlands.
This amount represents a reasonable allocation to the OBS Group
of the fair value of the loan. Also included is an allocated
balance of EUR 8 million and EUR 15 million
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for the
loan which will be redeemed by retaining future employee pension
premiums. These allocations have been made based upon the ratio
of the OBS Groups defined benefit obligations to the total
Akzo Nobel Pension Fund defined benefit obligation.
Note 13
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is probable that some or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in
F-29
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. The amount of the deferred tax assets
considered realizable, however, could change in the near term if
future estimates of projected taxable income during the
carry-forward period are revised.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to a
significant portion of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Net
|
|
Net
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
other provisions
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets/liabilities
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Offsetting of tax
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there
is a legally enforceable right to set off tax assets against tax
liabilities and when the deferred tax assets and liabilities
relate to the same tax authority.
The movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the
year is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Rates
|
|
in
Income
|
|
Other
|
|
2005
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other provisions
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
331
|
|
F-30
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Rates
|
|
in
Income
|
|
Other
|
|
2006
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
other provisions
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
Classification of the deferred tax assets and liabilities in the
combined balance sheets, which is determined at fiscal entity
level, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
At December 31, 2006, tax losses carried forward amounted
to EUR 60 million, of which EUR 14 million
(EUR 5 million of deferred tax assets) is not recognized in
the combined balance sheets. Of the total tax losses carried
forward, no tax losses carried forward will expire within one
year and EUR 46 million can be carried forward
indefinitely.
At December 31, 2005, tax losses carried forward amounted
to EUR 180 million, of which EUR 20 million
(EUR 6 million of deferred tax assets) is not recognized in
the combined balance sheets. Of the total tax losses carried
forward, EUR 1 million will expire within one year and
EUR 83 million can be carried forward indefinitely.
Note 14
Investments in Associates
These combined financial statements include the OBS Groups
ownership in the following investments in associates as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
Legal
Entity
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Ownership
|
|
South Egypt Drug Industries Co.
(Sedico)
|
|
Egypt
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
BioConnection B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
F-31
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
A summary of financial information for the investments in
associates on a 100% basis is provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Share of net income recognized in
the combined statements of income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates included
in the combined balance sheets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15
Inventories, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Semi-finished goods
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Finished products and goods for
resale
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
Of the total carrying amount of inventories at December 31,
2006 and 2005, EUR 1 million and
EUR 1 million, respectively, were stated at net
realizable value (fair value less cost to sell). In 2006, 2005
and 2004, EUR 22 million, EUR 24 million and
EUR 25 million, respectively, were recognized in the
combined statements of income for the write-down of inventories
to their net realizable values, while EUR 3 million,
EUR 6 million and EUR 1 million,
respectively, of write-downs were reversed in the period of sale.
Additionally, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, the OBS Group recorded an expense in the combined
statements of income of EUR 46 million,
EUR 46 million and EUR 53 million,
respectively, in regard of impairments in relation to obsolete
inventories. There are no inventories subject to retention of
title clauses.
Note 16
Income Tax Receivable and Payable
Income tax receivable of EUR 74 million and
EUR 62 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, represents the amount of income taxes recoverable
in respect of current and prior periods. Income tax payable of
EUR 133 million and EUR 194 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, relates to the
amount of taxes payable for current and prior periods to both
the tax authorities and Akzo Nobel.
For those OBS Group entities located in countries where they
were included in the tax grouping of other Akzo Nobel entities
within the respective entitys tax jurisdiction, the
current tax payable or receivable of these OBS Group entities
represents the income tax amount to be paid to or to be
F-32
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
received from the country tax leading holding of Akzo Nobel. For
the purpose of these combined financial statements, it is
assumed that only the current year is outstanding. As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, income tax receivable from Akzo
Nobel entities of EUR 15 million and income tax payable to
Akzo Nobel entities of EUR 15 million, respectively, are
included in the income tax receivable and income tax payable in
the combined balance sheets.
Income tax receivable and payable have been offset in cases
where there is a legally enforceable right to set off current
tax asset against current tax liability and when the intention
exists to settle on a net basis or to realize the receivable and
payable simultaneously.
Note 17
Trade and Other Receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Trade receivables are shown net of impairment losses of
EUR 15 million and EUR 15 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In the year ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the OBS Group recorded
net additions and reversals of impairment losses of
EUR 2 million, EUR 2 million and
EUR 3 million in the combined statements of income,
respectively.
Note 18
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Cash on hand and in banks
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Short-term investments almost entirely consist of cash loans,
time deposits, marketable private borrowings, and marketable
securities immediately convertible into cash.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the entire amount of cash
and cash equivalents was freely available.
Note 19
Invested Equity
The invested equity balance in the combined financial statements
of the OBS Group constitutes Akzo Nobels investment in the
OBS Group and represents the excess of total assets over total
liabilities. Invested equity includes the effects of carve-out
allocations from Akzo Nobel and the funding of the OBS Group
activities through the in-house banking, cash pooling loans from
and to related parties with Akzo Nobel, and the OBS Groups
cumulative net income, including income directly recognized in
equity. As a consequence, invested equity does not constitute
any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets
after deducting liabilities.
Cumulative
translation reserves
The cumulative translation reserves comprise all foreign
currency differences arising from the translation of the OBS
Groups financial statements of net investments in foreign
subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated
into euros at exchange rates on the balance sheet date. Revenues
and expenses are translated into euros at rates approximating
the
F-33
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates of the transactions.
Exchange differences resulting from translation into euros of
shareholders equities and of intercompany loans of a
permanent nature with respect to subsidiaries outside the euro
region are recorded within invested equity. Upon disposal or
liquidation of a foreign entity, these cumulative translation
adjustments are recognized as income or expense.
A description of the amounts recorded in invested equity is as
follows:
Share-based
payment costs funded by Akzo Nobel
The share-based payment costs funded by Akzo Nobel represents
share-based payment expenses, allocated to the OBS Group, based
on the actual OBS employees participating in the Akzo Nobel
share plans. See Note 20.
Interest
expense funded by Akzo Nobel
The interest expense funded by Akzo Nobel represents interest
charges allocated to the OBS Group based on average levels of
funding provided to the OBS Group by Akzo Nobel. See Note 3
and 7.
Corporate
overhead costs funded by Akzo Nobel
The corporate overhead costs funded by Akzo Nobel represent an
allocation of charges to the OBS Group incurred by Akzo Nobel
for various corporate administrative costs, on behalf of the
business units of the OBS Group. See Note 3.
Insurance
expense funded by Akzo Nobel
The insurance expense funded by Akzo Nobel represents insurance
expenses incurred by Akzo Nobel on behalf of the OBS Group that
have been allocated to the OBS Group. See Note 3.
Tax transfers
from/(to) Akzo Nobel
The tax transfers from/(to) Akzo Nobel represent intercompany
tax payments, receipts and settlements, from and to the OBS
Group and the Akzo Nobel tax leading holding companies.
Employee
benefits and other non-cash transfers
These amounts primarily represent allocations of employee
benefit related assets and liabilities in regard to pension
plans accounted for by Akzo Nobel on behalf of the OBS Group.
Cash transfers
from/(to) Akzo Nobel
The cash transfers from/(to) Akzo Nobel consist of group
contributions from or to Akzo Nobel, capital contributions
funded by Akzo Nobel, the net movement of funding by Akzo Nobel
and intra group movements. As of December 31, 2006 and
2005, invested equity includes EUR 1,049 million and
EUR 899 million, respectively, of funding by Akzo
Nobel, which does not have the characteristics of debt. Also, as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, invested equity includes
EUR 289 million and EUR 28 million,
respectively, of net loans due from and due to related parties,
respectively.
Note 20
Share-Based Payments
Akzo Nobel sponsors the following stock options plans and share
plans in which certain employees of the OBS Group participate.
As the share-based payment plans are Akzo Nobel plans, amounts
have been recognized through invested equity.
F-34
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Stock Option
Plans
Akzo Nobel grants options to all members of the Board of
Management, Senior Vice Presidents and Executives. Stock options
granted cliff-vest and are exercisable after three years. The
options granted to Senior Vice Presidents and Executives expire
after five years and options granted from 2002 onwards expire
after seven years. Options granted to members of the Board of
Management from 2000 expire after ten years and options granted
from 2003 onwards expire after seven years. All outstanding
options issued from 1999 cannot be exercised during the first
three years. One option entitles the holder thereof to buy one
Akzo Nobel N.V. common share or one American Depository Share
(ADS). The exercise price is the Euronext Amsterdam
opening price on the first day that the Akzo Nobel share is
quoted ex dividend or the opening price for an ADS on NASDAQ/NMS
on the first day that the Akzo Nobel ADS is quoted ex dividend.
Also, for the options granted since 2005, certain economic value
added performance criteria are included in the vesting
conditions. Through June 30, 2005, the option holder could
also request that the option be cash settled.
Since 2005, Akzo Nobel grants performance related stock options
to Executives. Under this plan, Executives are granted a
conditional number of options, under shareholder approval, whose
vesting is conditional on the achievement of financial
performance targets, expressed as Economic Value Added on
Invested Capital (EOI). The percentage of granted,
contingent options that vest depends on Akzo Nobels
average EOI over a three-year period. One option entitles the
holder thereof to buy one Akzo Nobel N.V. common share or one
ADS. The option holder can also request that the option be cash
settled.
These option plans could be cash settled through July 1,
2005, and were modified as of this date to be share settled. The
fair value of employee service received in return for share
options granted are measured by reference to the fair value of
share options granted. Until July 1, 2005, the OBS Group
recognized at each balance sheet the fair value of the options
outstanding per that date, taking into account the passage of
time of the three-year vesting period. The change in this fair
value was recognized in income. Compensation expense of
EUR 2 million has been recognized under these plans
for each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004.
Employee Share
Plan
In 2001, Akzo Nobel introduced the Akzo Nobel Employee Share
Plan, whereby Akzo Nobel N.V. common shares are granted to the
employees each year. Generally, these shares vest if the
employee has remained in Akzo Nobels service for a period
of three years. In November 2003, the Board of Management of
Akzo Nobel decided to accelerate the settlement of this plan
whereby the granted shares vested at May 1, 2004. Instead
of issuing shares to employees, Akzo Nobel settled its liability
with the OBS Group employees by making an approximate
EUR 4 million cash payment during the year ended
December 31, 2004. Additionally, the Board of Management of
Akzo Nobel concurrently terminated this plan during May 2004.
The OBS Group has recognized compensation expense of
EUR 2 million under this plan for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Performance
Share Plan (Executives and Board of Management)
In 2004, Akzo Nobel introduced a conditional performance stock
option plan for the Board of Management and on January 1,
2005 for Executives. Under this plan, members of the Board of
Management and Executives were granted a conditional number of
shares. The vesting of the shares is conditional on the
achievement of performance targets, expressed as Total
Shareholder Return
F-35
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
(TSR) of Akzo Nobel, relative to the TSR of a group
of competitors during the relative performance period. The
percentage of granted, contingent shares that vest depends on
Akzo Nobels TSR, relative to those of competitors,
achieved during the three-year vesting period. The awards will
be satisfied by the delivery of Akzo Nobel N.V. shares, or in
exceptional cases, by means of a cash payment.
Due to the performance criteria of the share plan, the OBS Group
bases compensation expense on the best available estimate of the
number of shares that are expected to vest and revises that
estimate, if necessary, if subsequent information indicates that
actual forfeitures are likely to differ from initial estimates.
Management expects the conditional shares granted to vest based
on available information. Expense of EUR 3 million,
EUR 1 million and EUR 0.1 million has been
recognized during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
The following is a summary of activity pertaining to the OBS
Group employees that participated in the various Akzo Nobel
stock option and share plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
American
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Depositary
|
|
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
|
|
Shares
|
|
in
EUR
|
|
Shares
|
|
in
USD
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2004
|
|
|
1,207,600
|
|
|
|
39.80
|
|
|
|
112,090
|
|
|
|
31.27
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
220,080
|
|
|
|
31.45
|
|
|
|
66,400
|
|
|
|
37.28
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(225,339
|
)
|
|
|
40.15
|
|
|
|
(12,870
|
)
|
|
|
26.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
1,202,341
|
|
|
|
38.21
|
|
|
|
165,620
|
|
|
|
34.02
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
257,523
|
|
|
|
31.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(242,785
|
)
|
|
|
43.27
|
|
|
|
(7,600
|
)
|
|
|
31.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
1,217,079
|
|
|
|
35.88
|
|
|
|
158,020
|
|
|
|
34.14
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
231,270
|
|
|
|
46.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(236,640
|
)
|
|
|
35.31
|
|
|
|
(59,880
|
)
|
|
|
33.17
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(112,050
|
)
|
|
|
44.91
|
|
|
|
(9,060
|
)
|
|
|
37.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
1,099,659
|
|
|
|
37.31
|
|
|
|
89,080
|
|
|
|
34.49
|
|
The following is a summary of activity pertaining to the OBS
Group Executives and Board of Management that participated in
the Akzo Nobel performance share plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Share Plan
|
|
|
(Executives and
Board
|
Outstanding
|
|
of
Management)
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
382,202
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,963
|
)
|
Accreted dividend
|
|
|
15,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
413,641
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
266,635
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(14,363
|
)
|
Accreted dividend
|
|
|
30,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
696,902
|
|
F-36
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Fair value and
assumptions used
The expected value of performance stock options for the Board of
Management and Executives is based on a binomial lattice option
pricing model, using certain assumptions. These assumptions were
used for these calculations only, and do not necessarily
represent an indication of managements expectations of
future developments. In addition, option valuation models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including
expected share price volatility. The OBS Groups employee
stock options have characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options and changes in the subjective
assumptions used for the calculation can materially affect the
fair value estimate.
The fair value and the assumptions used for the options granted
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares,
|
|
American
Depository
|
|
|
in EUR
|
|
Shares, in USD
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2004
|
|
Fair value at measurement date
|
|
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
7.45
|
|
|
|
7.94
|
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
Share price at measurement date
|
|
|
46.46
|
|
|
|
31.98
|
|
|
|
31.45
|
|
|
|
37.25
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
46.46
|
|
|
|
31.98
|
|
|
|
31.45
|
|
|
|
37.25
|
|
Expected share price volatility (%)
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
Expected option life (years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expected dividend yield (%)
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Risk free interest rate (%)
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
The expected volatility is based on the historic volatility
(calculated based on the weighted average remaining life of the
share options), adjusted for any expected changes to future
volatility due to publicly available information. Share options
are granted under a service condition and a non-market
performance condition. Such conditions are not taken into
account in the grant date fair value measurement. There are no
market conditions associated with the share option grants.
The grant date fair value of the performance shares is amortized
as an expense over the three-year vesting period. The fair value
at grant date is based on the Monte Carlo simulation model
taking market conditions into account. The value was calculated
by external actuaries and amounted to EUR 16.80 for the
performance shares conditionally granted in 2006, EUR 12.67
for the 2005 performance shares, and EUR 10.84 for the 2004
performance shares.
F-37
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 21
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Restructuring
of
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Activities
|
|
Other
|
|
Balance at January 1,
2005
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Additions made during the year
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Utilization
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
Amounts reversed during the year
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Transfers from Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unwind of discount
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Additions made during the year
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Utilization
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Amounts reversed during the year
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Transfers from Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above movement schedule includes the current portion of the
provisions, which at December 31, 2006 and 2005 amounted to
EUR 45 million and EUR 29 million,
respectively.
Provisions for
pensions and other postretirement benefits
The majority of the OBS Groups employees participate in
Akzo Nobel defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, which
provide benefits to employees and former employees of both the
OBS Group and other Akzo Nobel businesses. In these plans, the
assets and liabilities that relate to employees (and former
employees) of the OBS Group are combined with those related to
employees (and former employees) of other Akzo Nobel businesses.
The OBS Group has obtained information about each of these Akzo
Nobel plans measured in accordance with IAS 19 on the basis of
assumptions that apply to each of the plans as a whole, and used
a reasonable allocation method to determine the OBS Groups
portion of each plans assets, liabilities and benefit
costs under IAS 19. For each of these plans, the defined
benefit obligation (at each balance sheet date), and the service
cost, contributions, benefit payments, and impact of special
events (in each accounting period), relating to the OBS Group,
have been determined using approximate actuarial techniques
which take into account the membership profile of OBS Group
participants compared to the membership profile for participants
in the plan as a whole. Plan assets at each balance sheet date
have generally been split in the same proportion as the defined
benefit obligation.
Management believes that such allocations have been made on a
reasonable basis, but may not necessarily be indicative of the
actual separation of these pension plans in the future.
Furthermore, some OBS Group employees participate in stand-alone
OBS Group pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The
related expenses, assets and liabilities for these plans are
accounted for in the OBS Group businesses in accordance with IAS
19.
F-38
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The defined benefit pension plans in which the OBS Groups
employees participate generally provide benefits based on years
of service and employees compensation. The funding
policies for the plans are consistent with local requirements in
the countries of establishment. Obligations under the plans are
systematically provided for by depositing funds with trustees or
separate foundations, under insurance policies, or by balance
sheet provisions. Plan assets principally consist of long-term
interest-earning investments, quoted equity securities, and real
estate.
A number of OBS Groups current and former employees
participate in Akzo Nobel postretirement healthcare and life
assurance plans. The OBS Group has accrued for the expected
costs of providing such postretirement benefits during the years
that the employee rendered the necessary services.
Valuations of the obligations under the pension and other
postretirement benefit plans are carried out by independent
actuaries. The discount rates applied are based on yields
available on high quality corporate bonds that have currencies
and terms consistent with the currencies and estimated terms of
the OBS Groups obligations.
During 2006, Akzo Nobel closed their US and Canadian defined
benefit pension plans in which OBS Group employees and former
employees participate to further accrual and implemented defined
contribution plans for future benefit provision. During 2006,
Akzo Nobel also altered the qualification requirements and
changed the existing level of benefits in its US postretirement
welfare plan in which OBS Group employees and former employees
participate. Due to these changes, the OBS Groups
provision for pensions and other postretirement benefits
decreased by EUR 29 million, which was recorded in the
combined statements of income during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
During 2005, Akzo Nobel reached agreement with the unions to a
change to its pension arrangements in The Netherlands in which
OBS Group employees and former employees participate. With
effect from December 31, 2005, the pension plan changed
from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan and
certain changes were made to the pre-retirement plan. In
connection with these changes during 2005 Akzo Nobel paid a
one-time nonrefundable contribution of
EUR 151 million, prepaid EUR 50 million in
July 2005 of loans which are to be repaid by retaining employee
pension premiums, and granted a EUR 100 million
subordinated loan in September 2005 that had a fair value of
EUR 87 million. A proportion of these amounts has been
allocated to the OBS Group using the same method used to
allocate the rest of the plans assets. Management believes
that this allocation method is reasonable. These changes
resulted in a combined curtailment and settlement of defined
benefit obligations for the OBS Group of
EUR 1,086 million and a settlement of plan assets of
EUR 1,059 million, and of the recognition of
previously unrecognized gains and prior service costs totalling
EUR 32 million. In total, the net effect of the change
to The Netherlands pension arrangements was a pre-tax gain of
EUR 59 million, which has been recorded in the
combined statements of income in 2005.
Effective December 31, 2005, due to changes in the national
healthcare system in The Netherlands, the OBS Group also
terminated its postretirement healthcare plan in that country,
except for a gradually declining transition arrangement until
June 30, 2009. This change resulted in a curtailment of
defined benefit obligations of the OBS Group of
EUR 29 million, and the recognition of previously
unrecognized gains and prior service costs totalling
EUR 4 million. In total, the net effect of the
termination was a pre-tax gain on the termination of
EUR 33 million, which has been recorded in the
combined statements of income.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the principal defined
benefit pension plans covered approximately 24% and 51% of the
OBS Groups employees, respectively.
F-39
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Below, a table is provided with a summary of the changes in the
pension and the other postretirement benefit obligations and
plan assets for 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Asset/(liability)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation
(DBO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
(1,513
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Acquisitions/divestments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements/curtailments
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Service costs
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Contribution by employees
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest costs
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Actuarial gains and losses
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of
year
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of
year
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions/divestments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution by employer
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Contribution by employees
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in exchange rates
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of
year
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Unrecognized net loss/(gain)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance provisions
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
The pension defined benefit obligation breaks down as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Wholly or partly funded plans
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Unfunded plans
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
The difference between the actual and the expected return on
plan assets was a gain of EUR 11 million in 2006 and
EUR 80 million in 2005.
F-40
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 introduced prescription drug
benefits for retirees as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors
of postretirement healthcare plans, which both began at
January 1, 2006. This reimbursement right has been
recognized as an asset under other financial non-current assets,
in the combined balance sheets measured at fair value. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, this value was
EUR 9 million and EUR 12 million,
respectively.
The net periodic pension costs for the defined benefit pension
plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits
|
Charge/(income)
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Service costs for benefits earned
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest costs on DBO
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized losses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements/curtailments
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
The weighted average assumptions underlying the computations
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
Other
Postretirement Benefits
|
Percentage
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Pension benefit obligation
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discount rate
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
rate of compensation
increase
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Net periodic pension costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discount rate
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
rate on compensation
increase
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
expected return on plan
assets
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of the weighted average discount rate as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 excludes the pension plan of the
Netherlands. The assumptions for the expected return on plan
assets were based on a review of the historical returns of the
asset classes in which the assets of the pension plans are
invested. The historical returns on these asset classes were
weighted based on the expected long-term allocation of the
assets of the pension plans.
Akzo Nobels primary objective with regard to the
investment of pension plan assets is to ensure that in each
individual scheme sufficient funds are available to satisfy
future benefit obligations. For this purpose, asset and
liability management (ALM) studies are made periodically for
each pension fund. An appropriate asset mix is determined on the
basis of the outcome of these ALM studies, taking into account
the local rules and regulations.
Pension plan assets principally consist of long-term
interest-earning investments, quoted equity securities, and real
estate. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, plan assets did not
include financial instruments issued by the OBS Group, nor any
property occupied or other assets used by it. The
F-41
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
weighted average pension plan asset allocation at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the target allocation for
2007 for the pension plans by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Allocation at
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
December 31,
|
Percentage
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55-61
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Long-term interest earning
investments
|
|
|
32-38
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
1-4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0-6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Weighted average assumptions for other postretirement benefits
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Assumed healthcare cost trend
rates at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
healthcare cost trend
assumed for next year
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
rate to which the cost
trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
year that the rate reached
the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
In line with agreements in place until December 31, 2005,
allowances under the healthcare plan in the Netherlands are
assumed not to increase in the future.
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on
the amounts reported for the healthcare plans. A one percentage
point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have
the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
1 Percentage
|
|
|
Point
Increase
|
|
Point
Decrease
|
|
Effect on total of service and
interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on postretirement benefit
obligation
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Cash
flows
The OBS Group expects to contribute EUR 29 million to
its defined benefit pension plans in 2007.
The following benefit payments, which take into account the
effect of future service, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Pensions
|
|
Benefits
|
|
2007
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2008
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2009
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2010
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2011
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
F-42
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The remaining plans primarily represent defined contribution
pension plans. Expenses for these plans totaled
EUR 102 million in 2006 and EUR 3 million in
2005.
Provisions for
restructuring of activities
Provisions for restructuring of activities comprise accruals for
certain employee benefits and for costs that are directly
associated with plans to exit specific activities and closing
down of facilities. For all restructurings a detailed formal
plan exists, and the implementation of the plan has started or
the plan has been announced. Most restructuring activities
relate to relatively smaller restructurings, and are expected to
be completed within two years from the balance sheet date.
However, for certain plans payments of termination benefits to
former employees may take several years longer.
Other
provisions
Other provisions relate to a great variety of risks and
commitments, including provisions for other long-term employee
benefits like long-service leave and jubilee payments,
provisions for environmental costs, provision for returns,
allowances and legal claims. At December 31, 2006 and 2005,
the OBS Group has recorded a provision of
EUR 11 million, for returns and allowances. For
details on environmental exposures, see Note 27.
The majority of the cash outflows related to other provisions
are expected to be within 1 to 5 years. In calculating the
other provisions a discount rate of 5%, on average, has been
used.
Note 22
Deferred Income
In December 2003, the OBS Group received an initial payment of
EUR 88 million from Pfizer for the co-development and
co-marketing agreement for asenapine. Such payments are to be
reported as deferred income and to be recognized as revenue in
subsequent years. For this payment, recognition is based on the
estimated co-development costs expected to be incurred over the
estimated co-development period, which will be from 2004 to May
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Current deferred income
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Note 23
Borrowings (Non-current)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Debt to credit institutions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
During 2006 and 2005, the weighted average effective interest
rate was 5.9% and 4.4%, respectively.
Aggregate maturities of non-current borrowings at
December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2011
|
|
|
After
2011
|
|
|
Debt to credit institutions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
F-43
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, none of the borrowings were
secured by means of mortgages, etc.
Finance lease liabilities are included under other borrowings.
The amounts payable in respect of these finance lease
liabilities at December 31, 2006 are due as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
Interest
|
|
Principal
|
|
Next year
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Between 1 and 5 years
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Note 24
Borrowings (Current)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Debt to credit institutions
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Current portion of borrowings
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Note 25
Trade and Other Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Prepayments by customers
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Taxes and social security
contributions
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Amounts payable to employees
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Bonuses and discounts to customers
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Fair value derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trade and other payables
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
Note 26
Financial Instruments
Foreign
exchange risk management
The OBS Group enters into forward exchange contracts with Akzo
Nobel to hedge the transaction risk on sales, purchases, and
financing transactions denominated in currencies other than the
functional currency of the subsidiary concerned. The purpose of
these foreign currency hedging activities is to protect the OBS
Group from the risk that the eventual functional currency net
cash flows resulting from committed trade or financing
transactions are adversely affected by changes in exchange
rates. Most forward exchange contracts outstanding at year-end
have a maturity of less than one year. Where necessary, the
forward exchange contracts are rolled over at maturity. The OBS
Group does not use financial instruments to hedge the
translation risk related to equity, intercompany loans of a
permanent nature, and earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Currency
derivatives are not used for speculative purposes.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the notional value of
outstanding contracts to buy currencies totaled
EUR 21 million and EUR 43 million,
respectively, while contracts to sell currencies totaled
EUR 57 million and EUR 43 million,
respectively. These contracts mainly relate to the US dollar,
F-44
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Australian dollar, Swiss franc, Swedish kronor, Norwegian
kronor, Polish zloty, pounds sterling, and Japanese yen, all
having maturities within one year.
Interest risk
management
The subordinated loan to the Akzo Nobel Pension Fund is
sensitive to changes in interest rates. The OBS Groups
share of the face value of the loan is EUR 36 million
and the expected maturity is subsequent to 2010 with an average
interest rate of 3.5%. The OBS Groups share of the
carrying value of the loan and estimated fair value is
EUR 33 million with an effective interest rate of 5.1%.
Credit
risk
The OBS Group has a credit risk management policy in place. The
exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit
evaluations are performed on all customers requiring credit.
Generally the OBS Group does not require collateral in respect
of financial assets.
Investments in cash and cash equivalents are entered into with
counterparties which have a high credit rating and limits per
counterparty have been set. Transactions involving derivative
financial instruments are with counterparties with sound credit
ratings and with whom the OBS Group has contractual netting
agreements. The OBS Group has no reason to expect nonperformance
by the counterparties to these agreements.
Due to the geographical spread of the OBS Group and the
diversity of its customers, at balance sheet date the OBS Group
was not subject to any significant concentration of credit
risks. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the
carrying amount of each financial asset, including derivative
financial instruments, in the combined balance sheets.
Sensitivity
analysis
By managing currency risks, the OBS Group aims to reduce the
impact of short-term fluctuations on the OBS Groups
earnings. Over the longer-term, however, permanent changes in
foreign exchange and interest rates would have an impact on
combined earnings.
At December 31, 2006, the decrease in the OBS Groups
profit before tax as a result of a general increase of one
percentage point in interest rates would be negligible. Cash and
cash equivalent and current borrowings have been included in
this assessment.
Fair value of
financial instruments
The estimated fair values at December 31, 2006 of
non-current borrowings and the subordinated loan to the Akzo
Nobel Pension Fund approximate their carrying values. The fair
value of the OBS Groups non-current borrowings was
estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or
similar issues or on the current rates offered to the OBS Group
for debt with similar maturities.
The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using
quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005 the OBS Groups forward
exchange contracts were recognized at fair value. The OBS Group
implemented IAS 32 and IAS 39 from January 1, 2005. The
effect for the year ended December 31, 2004 of not applying
IAS 32 and IAS 39 was not material. After implementing IAS 32
and IAS 39 from January 1, 2005, forward exchange contracts
are carried at fair value.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
current borrowings, and other current liabilities approximate
fair value due to the short maturity period of those instruments.
F-45
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 27
Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Environmental
matters
The OBS Group is confronted with costs arising out of
environmental laws and regulations, which include obligations to
eliminate or limit the effects on the environment of the
disposal or release of certain wastes or substances at various
sites. Proceedings involving environmental matters, such as the
alleged discharge of chemicals or waste materials into the air,
water, or soil, are pending against the OBS Group in various
countries.
It is the OBS Groups policy to accrue and charge against
earnings environmental cleanup costs when it is probable that a
liability has been incurred and an amount is reasonably
estimable. These accruals are reviewed periodically and
adjusted, if necessary, as assessments and cleanups proceed and
additional information becomes available. Environmental
liabilities can change substantially due to the emergence of
additional information on the nature or extent of the
contamination, the necessity of employing particular methods of
remediation, actions by governmental agencies or private
parties, or other factors of a similar nature. Cash expenditures
often lag behind the period in which an accrual is recorded by a
number of years.
The provisions for environmental costs accounted for in
accordance with the aforesaid policies aggregated nil and
EUR 2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The provision has been discounted using an average
discount rate of 5.25% and 5.0% for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The OBS Group has certain asset retirement obligations for which
the timing of settlement is conditional upon the closure of the
related operating facility. At this time, there are no specific
plans for the closure of these related facilities, and the OBS
Group currently intends to make improvements to the assets as
necessary that would extend their lives indefinitely.
Furthermore, the settlement dates have not been specified by
law, regulation or contract. As a result, the OBS Group is
unable to estimate the fair value of the liability. If a closure
plan for any of these facilities is initiated in the future, the
settlement dates will become determinable, an estimate of the
fair value will be made, and an asset retirement obligation will
be recorded.
While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of all pending
environmental exposures, it is reasonably possible that there
will be a need for future provisions for environmental costs
which, in Managements opinion, based on information
currently available, would not have a material effect on the OBS
Groups financial position and liquidity but could be
material to the OBS Groups results of operations in any
one accounting period.
Antitrust
In 1999, the Brazilian Consumer Authority commenced action
against Hoechst Roussel Vet, a veterinary company acquired by
Intervet in 1999. The Brazilian Consumer Authority demanded the
OBS Group to justify the prices charged for FMD vaccines,
asserting that such prices were abusive. On February 1,
2001, the Secretariat for Economic Monitoring issued a technical
opinion recommending the dismissal of the proceeding, because
there was no proof of the alleged conduct. An economic survey
justifying the pricing and documentation was provided by
Intervet to the Ministry of Justice in May 2005. However, no
final report and opinion has been published at this time. The
maximum fine the Brazilian Consumer Authority could impose on
Intervet is 30% of the total gross revenue of the Brazilian
subsidiary in the year before the alleged infraction, which
would amount to less than EUR 10 million.
Also in 1999, the Brazilian Antitrust Authority commenced an
investigation into Organons Brazilian subsidiary and 20
other pharmaceutical companies to investigate alleged collusion
on their
F-46
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
part against generic manufacturers of pharmaceutical products in
Brazil. A final administrative decision was issued in October
2005, and each pharmaceutical company, including our subsidiary,
was convicted and fined an amount equal to 1% of total gross
revenue (free from tax) in the year before the infraction. This
amount has not yet been established, however, the OBS Group has
made a provision in the amount of approximately
EUR 0.8 million.
Litigation
During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the OBS
Group paid EUR 64 million and
EUR 87 million, respectively, to settle claims with
respect to antitrust cases relating to the Companys
Remeron®
product. These amounts were accrued prior to 2004.
In December 2005, the OBS Group reached a settlement agreement
with Duramed/Barr on its infringement of the OBS Groups
rights to the
Mircette®
patent. Duramed/Barr paid the OBS Group
EUR 109 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005, for the transfer of the marketing rights
to
Mircette®
and for damages connected to the OBS Groups claim. The OBS
Group recognized EUR 70 million of these proceeds
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
During 2005, the State of Alabama, the State of Mississippi, and
41 counties (now 42 counties) and New York City within the State
of New York, separately brought claims against up to
approximately 80 pharmaceutical manufacturers, including Organon
Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., the predecessor of our United States
subsidiary Organon Pharmaceuticals U.S.A Inc. LLC and Organon
USA, Inc., alleging pricing fraud and, in the case of the State
of Mississippi, conspiracy to commit such fraud, in violation of
state, federal,
and/or
common law. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants committed
fraud and were unjustly enriched by intentionally setting false
and inflated average wholesale prices for their pharmaceutical
products, which is the basis for Medicaid reimbursement. The
plaintiffs further allege that such products were then marketed
to pharmacists, physicians
and/or
pharmacy chain stores in such a way as to capitalize on the
difference between the amount reimbursed by Medicaid for
dispensing the products and the actual acquisition cost for the
products. The allegations against our subsidiary have been pled
with limited specificity and, although
Remeron®
sales are specifically mentioned in most complaints, in all
cases except in Alabama, the allegations may extend to other
products also. The complaints seek injunctive relief as well as
actual, statutory, treble and punitive damages and, in some
cases, disgorgements.
All but four of the New York county cases have been consolidated
in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Three of the remaining New York cases have been removed to
federal district courts in New York and transfer to the US
District Court for the District of Massachusetts pending a
decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. A
motion to dismiss the cases in the US District Court for the
District of Massachusetts was partially granted in April 2007.
Thereafter, plaintiffs have filed a First Amended Consolidated
Complaint, in response to which defendants, including our
subsidiaries, have filed a joint motion to dismiss. A decision
on this motion is expected in the second half of 2007. A motion
to dismiss the Erie County case (one of the cases pending
transfer to the US District Court for the District of
Massachusetts) was partially granted in September 2006. The
Mississippi case has been dismissed. The proceedings in the
State of Alabama are at an early stage, with discovery having
commenced on April 13, 2005. The OBS Group does not believe
to have been engaged in any improper conduct and are vigorously
defending these matters.
Certain wholly owned operating subsidiaries of Organon and
Intervet were named in the final report of the Independent
Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil for Food
Program for humanitarian support to Iraq. The report states that
these entities made some improper payments in connection with
four contracts (with a total value of USD 3.4 million)
with the Iraqi Government to
F-47
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
provide pharmaceuticals and vaccines. Akzo Nobel has been
conducting an internal review of this matter and has voluntarily
reported on that review to the US Securities and Exchange
Commission and to the US Department of Justice. The Dutch
FIOD/ECD also conducted an investigation into Organons
involvement in this matter; these investigations have been
concluded in May 2007. The OBS Group is currently discussing a
possible settlement with these authorities. While neither of the
said authorities have taken any action against Akzo Nobel or its
subsidiaries, this matter could expose Akzo Nobel
and/or its
subsidiaries to regulatory
and/or
criminal charges and sanctions.
In January 2006, Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. and the Akzo Nobel
Pension Fund in The Netherlands received a summons from the
Association of Retired Akzo Nobel Employees (Vereniging van
Gepensioneerden Akzo Nobel) with regard to the changed financing
of Akzo Nobels Dutch pension plan (relating to the change
from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan), as
a consequence of which an alleged unconditional right to
indexation became conditional. If the claim were to succeed,
then, pursuant to the separation agreement, the OBS Group would
be responsible to reimburse Akzo Nobel or any other member of
its group for all losses actually incurred in connection
therewith to the extent relating to any former employees that,
at the time of ceasing their employment with the Akzo Nobel
Group, worked primarily in any current or former human
healthcare or animal healthcare activities of the Akzo Nobel
Group. The claim was recently dismissed by the Court of First
Instance. An appeal can be filed within three months after the
courts judgment, which period expires in April 2007.
In July 2006, drug wholesaler RxUSA brought claims against 16
pharmaceutical manufacturers, including the OBS Group, as well
as against five drug wholesalers, the Healthcare Management
Distribution Association and certain individuals, alleging joint
and several liability for, amongst other things, monopolization
of the wholesale pharmaceutical market in violation of state and
federal antitrust laws. The plaintiff claims that defendants
willfully acquired and sought to maintain a monopoly and exclude
competition by secondary wholesalers. The plaintiff
further alleges that the 16 pharmaceutical manufacturers and
other wholesale dealers wrongfully and illegally refused to deal
directly with RxUSA, making it impossible for it to acquire
products for sale. RxUSA is seeking injunctive relief,
attorneys fees and treble damages. The proceedings are at
an early stage. The OBS Group has filed motions to dismiss these
claims and intend to contest them vigorously.
During 2006, the OBS Group lost key elements of patent
protection for
Livial®
in the United Kingdom. Key protective claims under our chemical
purity, crystalline purity and particle size patents have
recently been revoked by U.K. courts. The OBS Group has decided
to appeal the revocation of the crystalline purity patent, but
not to appeal the decision regarding the chemical purity patent.
Permission to appeal the decision regarding the particle size
patent has been denied by the court in London. The OBS
Groups chemical purity patent has been revoked by the
European Patent Office. The OBS Group has appealed the decision
to revoke this patent, and this appeal has had a suspensive
effect on revocation. The OBS Groups particle size patent
has also been challenged before the European Patent Office.
A number of the OBS Group subsidiaries are the subject of
litigation or product liability claims arising out of the normal
conduct of their business, as a result of which claims could be
made against them which, in whole or in part, might not be
covered by insurance. Provisions are established for the gross
amount of any probable claim that can be reasonably estimated.
Insurance receivables are recorded only in respect of amounts
that are virtually certain to be recovered.
There are various remaining product liability claims pending
against the OBS Group in various European countries, Brazil,
Mexico and Australia by, in most cases, women claiming to have
conceived while allegedly using the OBS Groups
contraceptive
Implanon®.
Other claims relate to
F-48
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
problems in connection with the insertion or removal of
Implanon®
or to changes in bleeding patterns. Often, the physician who
inserted the product is named as a co-defendant. Although these
cases have all been brought by individual women, only in The
Netherlands the competent court has decided to consolidate the
cases. On June 15, 2005, a court in s-Hertogenbosch
in The Netherlands issued a preliminary judgment to the effect
that, pending allocation of responsibility between physicians
and Organon, damages should be paid to women who unintentionally
became pregnant while using
Implanon®.
The OBS Group appealed this decision in September 2005. Oral
pleadings were presented for the court of appeal on May 14,
2007. A judgment is expected on August 28, 2007. No final
judgments have been rendered. Any damages for which the OBS
Group may be held liable in connection with these cases are
expected to be covered by product liability insurance.
In 1999, an ex-freelance collaborator of Diosynth B.V./Moeders
voor Moeders, commenced legal action with respect to alleged
entitlements to retirement benefits against Diosynth B.V. (as
per January 1, 2007, part of N.V. Organon). Entitlement to
a retirement benefit requires an employment relationship;
Diosynth believes that freelancers working for Moeders voor
Moeders do not qualify as employees and are not entitled to
receive a pension. The legal position in this case may create a
precedent for a couple of hundred of ex-freelancers of Moeders
voor Moeders. The deposition of witnesses in this case will be
finalized on October 4, 2007.
Salmon producers in Chile have made claims for damages allegedly
incurred because of the use of Intervets fish vaccines in
that country. The claims were filed in 2005, 2006 and 2007. The
claims maintain that administration of Intervets vaccine
against vibriosis and infectious pancreatic necrosis caused
death or injury to part of their salmon populations. No
judgments have been rendered. At this time the OBS Group has no
reason to believe that any damages for which the OBS Group may
be held liable in connection with these claims would not be
covered by the product liability insurance the OBS Group
maintains.
A case from Intervet, Inc. against Merial Ltd. et al. is pending
since December 23, 2005 in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia. This lawsuit is a declaratory
judgment action seeking a declaration from the court that United
States Patent No. 6,368,601 (titled Porcine
Circovirus Vaccine and Diagnostics Reagents and referred
to herein as the 601 patent) is invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed by Intervets PCV-2
vaccine.
Merial Ltd, and Merial SAS have answered the Complaint by
alleging that the 601 patent is valid, enforceable, and
infringed by Intervets PCV-2 vaccine. They also have
brought a counterclaim for patent infringement against Intervet,
Inc. Intervet has responded by asserting that the 601
patent is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed by Intervet,
Inc. Discovery is presently ongoing between Merial SAS, Merial
Ltd, and Intervet Inc. Under the present schedule for the case,
there will be a hearing to determine the meaning of the claims
of the 601 patent early August, 2007. Trial of this matter
likely will not occur until the second or third quarter of 2008.
A second case, Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd. et al., is pending
since March 20, 2007, in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia. This lawsuit is a declaratory
judgment action seeking a declaration from the court that United
States Patent No. 7,192,594 (titled Postweaning
Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome and Porcine Circovirus from
Pigs and referred to herein as the 594
patent) is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed by
Intervets PCV-2 vaccine. Merial Ltd, and Merial SAS have
filed and served a Complaint for patent infringement and demand
for jury trial, alleging that the 594 patent is valid,
enforceable, and infringed by Intervets PCV-2 vaccine.
In November 2006, four trade unions together initiated
proceedings in The Netherlands against Akzo Nobel Nederland
B.V., a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel. The trade unions claim that
Akzo Nobel
F-49
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Nederland B.V., allegedly as representative of all other
parts of the Akzo Nobel Group, wrongfully terminated the
future payment of an allowance to cover medical insurance costs
of retirees in The Netherlands. These retirees also include
persons who were employed in current or former human healthcare
and animal healthcare activities of the Akzo Nobel Group.
The trade unions allege that the retirees, on the basis of a
promise made by Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V., were entitled to
receive the allowance indefinitely and that there was
insufficient cause for termination of the obligation. Akzo Nobel
Nederland B.V. has indicated that it had the right to terminate
the arrangements subject to a transitional regime through
June 30, 2009. Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. has expressed the
intention to defend the claim by the trade unions. The
proceedings against Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. are at an early
stage. It is currently not clear what would be the financial
consequences for the OBS Group if the claim would succeed.
Pursuant to the separation agreement, the OBS Group will be
responsible for all costs incurred by Akzo Nobel or any other
member of its group in connection with the allowances mentioned
above with respect to retirees that, at the time of ceasing
their employment with the Akzo Nobel Group, worked primarily in
any current or former human healthcare or animal healthcare
activities of the Akzo Nobel Group. The maximum amount that the
OBS Group could be required to reimburse would depend on a
number of factors, which also include the arrangements with
individual employees, any future changes in the arrangements,
and the age to which the retirees will live.
On March 23, 2007 the University of Illinois filed a
lawsuit against Organon Teknika Corporation for breach of
contract of the revised Tice license agreement which
dates back to 1986. The UOI claims USD 14.9 million of
underpaid royalties (which is UOIs calculation of the
present value of the alleged royalty underpayment), based on an
audit on the period January 1, 2002, through
December 31, 2004. The difference relates to a different
interpretation of what the correct arms length price
should be. Organon Teknika is of the opinion that it paid the
correct amount of royalties.
There have been various lawsuits filed against several US
entities relating to the use of NuvaRing. With the exception of
three cases, the lawsuits contain little information about the
claimed injuries. It should be noted that Organon does not yet
have medical or other records to corroborate the allegations.
The remaining cases do not contain any information other than
the allegation that the women used NuvaRing and sustained
injuries thereby. Other general allegations of the
thrombogenicity of the product suggest that the claimants intend
to allege that they sustained a thromboembolic event.
A number of other claims are pending against the OBS Group, all
of which are contested. The OBS Group is also involved in
disputes with tax authorities in several jurisdictions.
Furthermore, in the context of the divestitures of certain
businesses by Akzo Nobel, our sole shareholder, prior to the
creation of our company, the relevant Akzo Nobel Group companies
have agreed to indemnify
and/or
provide guarantees to the buyers (and/or their successors and
assignees) regarding certain representations and warranties or
developments. To the extent that these relate to the current or
former human pharmaceutical or animal health business activities
of Akzo Nobel, the OBS Group agreed under the Separation
Agreement to indemnify Akzo Nobel in respect of claims arising
therefrom.
While the outcome of these claims and disputes cannot be
predicted with certainty, the OBS Group believes, based upon
legal advice and information received, that the final outcome
will not materially affect the combined financial position of
the OBS Group but could be material to the OBS Groups
result of operations or cash flows in any one accounting period.
Other
contingent liabilities
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, guarantees related to
contracts with third parties totaled EUR 3 million and
EUR 7 million, respectively.
F-50
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
A majority of the OBS Group businesses do not file separate tax
returns since these entities were included in the tax groupings
of other Akzo Nobel entities within their respective
entitys tax jurisdiction. Certain tax authorities have the
right to hold an individual entity within the tax grouping
liable for any and all liabilities outstanding of the group.
Management of the OBS Group believes that the chances are remote
that the OBS Group will be held responsible for tax liabilities
incurred by other Akzo Nobel entities.
The OBS Group is a party in several research and development
collaborations and licensing agreements. These agreements have
various compensation elements that can contain periodic
payments, payments related to sales of certain products and
milestone payments. The periodic payments are expensed in the
period they relate to and the payments related to sales of
certain products are expensed in the period the corresponding
sales were recognized. Milestone payments are expensed in the
period in which the recognition criteria related to the
milestone are met.
Some of the licenses and collaboration, co-development,
co-marketing and other agreements and instruments to which the
OBS Group is a party, contain change of control provisions that
may be triggered by a change in the controlling interest in our
business. See Note 31 for further discussion of potential
impacts related to the separation of the OBS Group.
Pfizer terminated the asenapine license and collaboration
agreement on November 27, 2006. The termination took effect
on May 27, 2007. If and when we are successful in bringing
asenapine to the market, we will be obliged to reimburse Pfizer
for its out-of-pocket expenses (plus 10% interest) for
development, marketing and manufacturing, by paying it a royalty
at the rate of 5% on net asenapine sales.
Commitments
Purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment
aggregated EUR 69 million and EUR 35 million
at December 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively. The OBS Group
also has purchase commitments for materials and other supplies
incident to the ordinary conduct of business for a total of
EUR 358 million and EUR 320 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Long-term liabilities contracted in respect of leasehold,
rental, operating leases, research, etc., aggregated
EUR 287 million and EUR 261 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Payments due
within one year amounted to EUR 93 million and
EUR 78 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively; payments between one and five years
EUR 158 million and EUR 159 million,
respectively, and payments due after more than five years amount
to EUR 36 million and EUR 24 million,
respectively.
Note 28
Cash Flow Information
The OBS Group paid cash for income taxes of
EUR 41 million, EUR 57 million and
EUR 70 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the periods presented,
some entities of the OBS Group businesses did not file separate
tax returns as these entities were included in the tax grouping
of other Akzo Nobel entities within the respective entitys
tax jurisdiction, and the OBS Groups tax obligations for
these entities are paid by other Akzo Nobel entities.
The OBS Group paid cash for interest of
EUR 11 million, EUR 7 million and
EUR 6 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The OBS Groups financing requirements are primarily met by
cash transfers with Akzo Nobel and are reflected in the
financing section of the combined statements of cash flows. This
represents
F-51
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
net cash transfers to and from Akzo Nobel for the settlement of
various intercompany transactions and financing requirements
with Akzo Nobel.
Note 29
Accounting Estimates and Judgments
In preparing the financial statements, management makes
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the OBS
Groups combined financial statements. The most critical
accounting policies involving a higher degree of judgment and
complexity are described below.
Impairment of
intangible assets and property, plant and
equipment
The OBS Group reviews long-lived assets for impairment when
events or circumstances indicate carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. Assets subject to this review include intangible
and tangible fixed assets. In determining impairments of
intangible and tangible fixed assets, management must make
significant judgments and estimates to determine if the future
cash flows expected to be generated by those assets are less
than their carrying value. Determining cash flows requires the
use of judgments and estimates that have been included in the
OBS Groups strategic plans and long-range planning
forecasts. The data necessary for the execution of the
impairment tests are based on managements estimates of
future cash flows, which require estimating revenue growth rates
and profit margins. Assets are written down to their recoverable
amount. This recoverable amount of impaired assets is determined
by taking into account these estimated cash flows and using a
net present value technique based on discounting these cash
flows with business-specific discount rates.
Changes in assumptions and estimates included in the impairment
reviews could result in significantly different earnings than
those recorded in the combined financial statements.
Internally
generated research and development
Under IAS 38, Intangible Assets, an intangible asset is
recognized when it is probable that the expected future economic
benefits that are attributable to the asset will flow to the OBS
Group and when the cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
Internally generated research expenditure does not satisfy these
criteria, and therefore is expensed as incurred under research
and development expenses.
Internally generated development expenses are recognized as an
intangible asset if, and only if, all the following can be
demonstrated: (a) the technical feasibility of completing
the development project; (b) the OBS Groups intention
to complete the project; (c) the OBS Groups ability
to use the project; (d) the probability that the project
will generate future economic benefits; (e) the
availability of adequate technical, financial and other
resources to complete the project; and (f) the ability to
measure the development expenditure reliably. Due to the risks
and uncertainties relating to regulatory approval and to the
research and development process, the criteria for
capitalization are considered not to have been met until
marketing approval has been obtained from the regulatory
authorities.
Accounting for
income taxes
As part of the process of preparing the combined financial
statements, the OBS Group is required to estimate income taxes
in each of the jurisdictions in which the OBS Group operates.
This process involves estimating actual current tax expenses and
temporary differences between tax and financial reporting.
Temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and
liabilities, which are included in the combined balance sheet.
The OBS Group must then assess whether it is probable that
deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income.
F-52
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Provisions
By their nature, provisions for contingent liabilities are
dependent upon estimates and assessments whether the criteria
for recognition have been met, including estimates as to the
outcome and the amount of the potential cost of resolution.
Contingent liabilities are recognized by a charge against income
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.
Contingent liabilities and provisioning for environmental
matters, litigation, and tax disputes are discussed in
Note 27. Provisions for environmental matters are based on
the nature and seriousness of the contamination as well as on
the technology required for cleanup. Provisions for litigation
and tax disputes are also based on an estimate of the costs,
taking into account legal advice and information currently
available.
Should the actual outcome differ from the assumptions and
estimates, revisions to the estimated provisions would be
required, which could impact the OBS Groups financial
position and results from operations.
Also provisions for termination benefits and exit costs involve
managements judgment in estimating the expected cash
outflows for severance payments and site closure or other exit
costs. Should the actual cash outflows differ from the
assumptions and estimates, additional charges would be required,
which could impact the OBS Groups financial position and
results from operations.
Accounting for
pensions and other postretirement benefits
Retirement benefits represent obligations that will be settled
in the future and require assumptions to project benefit
obligations and fair values of plan assets. Retirement benefit
accounting is intended to reflect the recognition of future
benefit costs over the employees approximate service
period, based on the terms of the plans and the investment and
funding decisions made by the OBS Group. The accounting requires
management to make assumptions regarding variables such as
discount rate, rate of compensation increase, return on assets,
mortality rates, and future healthcare costs. Periodically,
management consults with external actuaries regarding these
assumptions. Changes in these key assumptions can have a
significant impact on the projected benefit obligations, funding
requirements and periodic costs incurred. For details on key
assumptions and policies, see Note 21.
It should be noted that when discount rates decline or rates of
compensation increase due to e.g. increased
inflation pension and postretirement benefit
obligations will increase. Net periodic pension and
postretirement costs might also increase, but that depends on
the actual relation between the unrecognized loss and the
so-called corridor (10% of the greater of benefit obligations
and plan assets) as well as on the relative change of the
discount rate versus the change of the benefit obligation.
Note 30
Subsequent Events
Loan from Akzo
Nobel
On February 28, 2007, Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group entered
into a EUR 1.15 billion loan. Under the loan
agreement, the maturity date of the loan is December 31,
2007, and the interest rate is the
6-month
EURIBOR + 0.15% that accrues on the amount owed from
March 1, 2007 to the date of payment (both days inclusive).
The entire principal amount of the loan not yet repaid to Akzo
Nobel shall be due for immediate payment without any further
notification or formality being required should, amongst others,
any other indebtedness of the OBS Group becomes due and payable
prior to its
F-53
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
specified maturity by reason of any default by the OBS Group in
the due performance or observance of any obligation relating
thereto, unless such indebtedness shall not be material in the
context of the loan agreement.
Schering-Plough
proposal to purchase the OBS Group
On March 12, 2007,
Schering-Plough
announced its intention to acquire the OBS Group from Akzo Nobel
for EUR 11 billion in cash.
Note 31
Incorporation and Separation
Incorporation
Following the announcement of Akzo Nobel that it intends to
separate its healthcare activities from the Akzo Nobel Group,
Akzo Nobel incorporated OBS N.V. on September 1, 2006 as a
public company with limited liability (naamloze
vennootschap) incorporated under the laws of The
Netherlands with an authorized share capital of EUR 225
thousand and an issued share capital of EUR 45 thousand.
The OBS N.V.s corporate seat is in Oss, The Netherlands.
On September 30, 2006 Akzo Nobel contributed to OBS N.V.,
through a contribution in kind, the shares of the two subholding
companies, Organon BioSciences International B.V. and Organon
BioSciences Nederland B.V., in exchange for 24,955,000 ordinary
shares of OBS N.V. with a nominal value of EUR 1.00 (one
euro) per share. As per the date of this contribution, the
Company had an authorized share capital of
EUR 125 million and an issued share capital of
EUR 25 million.
The combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2006, include invested equity amounting to
EUR 2,311 million. The invested equity included
certain allocated balances, which legally were not part of the
aforesaid contribution in kind to OBS N.V. on September 30,
2006. Consequently, the shareholders equity in the legal
company balance sheet of OBS N.V. as of December 31,
2006 differs from the invested equity in the combined financial
statements as of December 31, 2006. The main differences
relate to a different classification of the Akzo Nobel related
funding (presented as invested equity in the combined financial
statements and as intercompany debt in the legal company balance
sheet), provisions for tax liabilities related to allocated
balances which will be settled by Akzo Nobel as these tax
liabilities were incurred by the OBS entities when those were
part of an Akzo Nobel fiscal unity, and to certain other items
which are allocated to the OBS Group which will not be
transferred to the OBS Group.
Separation
In February 2006, Akzo Nobel announced its intention to separate
the OBS Group. In March 2007, Akzo Nobel announced that it had
subsequently received an offer from
Schering-Plough
to acquire the OBS Group. The works council advice procedure in
the Netherlands is still to be completed. Subject thereto, the
intended closing is further subject to certain conditions
precedent, including the obtaining of merger clearances in
certain jurisdictions. The proceeds from the sale of the OBS
Group will not be received by the OBS Group but will be received
by Akzo Nobel.
Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group have identified certain issues and
areas that, in preparation of and following the separation,
required mutually agreeable arrangements between them. These
issues and areas have been included in a separation agreement,
entered into between Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group. The
separation agreement was signed on February 28, 2007, and
was subsequently amended on March 11, 2007.
F-54
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The amended separation agreement addresses, amongst others, the
separation of liabilities and obligations, health, safety, and
environmental indemnities, release of guarantees, pending
litigation, provisions and accruals, claimants insurance
and employee benefit related matters.
The terms of the intended transaction between Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough
include that, subject to certain limitations and procedural
provisions, Akzo Nobel indemnifies
Schering-Plough
for (i) all taxes for which a member of the OBS Group
becomes liable, relating to the period prior to January 1,
2007 and that are not provided for in the combined financial
statements of the OBS Group for the period ended as of
December 31, 2006, and (ii) taxes for which a member
of the OBS Group becomes liable relating to the period starting
on January 1, 2007 and ending on the closing date of the
intended transaction, unless and to the extent the member of the
OBS Group concerned retains the benefit of the underlying
income, profit or gain at closing, or such income, profit, gain
or event has arisen in the ordinary course of business of the
member of the OBS Group concerned.
The terms of the intended transaction further include
Schering-Plough
will indemnify Akzo Nobel against any increase of taxes incurred
by Akzo Nobel or a member of Akzo Nobel as a consequence of any
pre-closing transactions, requested by
Schering-Plough
and consented by Akzo Nobel, which would allow for a direct sale
by Akzo Nobel of the shares in one or more members of the OBS
Group to
Schering-Plough.
The separation agreement also contains provisions dealing with
the retirement benefits of relevant participants in various
applicable pension arrangements based on an agreed upon division
of the rights, obligations, assets and liabilities relating to,
on the one hand, the retirement benefits of the relevant
(current and former) employees in the (current and former) human
healthcare or animal healthcare activities of the OBS Group and,
on the other hand, retirement benefits of other participants in
Akzo Nobel plans. It should be noted that a number of these
provisions are dependent on the approval of relevant third
parties, for example pension fund trustees, employee
representative bodies and relevant authorities. The separation
agreement thus also provides that in the event that the OBS
Group and Akzo Nobel have not been able to give effect to the
agreed (basis for) division, they will use their reasonable best
efforts to procure that the parties are placed in the same
position as they would have had the division been affected on
the agreed basis.
OBS N.V. has undertaken in the separation agreement to procure
that, for services rendered on or after January 1, 2007,
relevant participants under the OBS Groups retirement
benefit plans are offered retirement benefits which are
substantially equivalent (or such other measure as may be
required under applicable law) to their current retirement
benefits.
The financial implications of a future split as defined above,
for example on assets, liabilities and future pension premiums,
if any, cannot be determined yet. However, it is the intention
of Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group to limit the financial
implications for the companies, arising out of the split of
rights, obligations and assets. Furthermore, the subordinated
loan to the Akzo Nobel Pension Fund of which the OBS
Groups portion (EUR 33 million) was allocated in the
combined financial statements for the year ending
December 31, 2006, will remain with Akzo Nobel since Akzo
Nobel holds the legal title.
The terms of the intended transaction between Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough
further include that (i) Akzo Nobel will transfer to the
purchaser, at closing of the intended transaction, its claim
against OBS N.V. under the related party loan of
EUR 1.15 billion plus accrued interest and
ii) all other intra-group indebtedness between OBS N.V. on
the one hand and the other members of the Akzo Nobel Group on
the other hand (including several loans made by OBS N.V. to Akzo
Nobel in 2007 on terms substantially equivalent to the aforesaid
related party loan), and subsequently will be
F-55
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
paid immediately after closing. Under the loan agreement between
Akzo Nobel (as lender) and OBS N.V. (as borrower) the maturity
date of the loan is December 31, 2007 and the interest rate
is the
6-month
EURIBOR + 0.15%, that accrues on the amount owed, from
March 1, 2007 to the date of payment (both days inclusive).
The entire principal amount of the loan not yet repaid to Akzo
Nobel shall be due for immediate payment without any further
notification or formality being required should, amongst others,
any other indebtedness of OBS N.V. becomes due and payable prior
to its specified maturity by reason of any default by OBS N.V.
in the due performance or observance of any obligation relating
thereto, unless such indebtedness shall not be material in the
context of the loan agreement.
OBS N.V. has undertaken to replace the statement of joint and
several liability (verklaring van hoofdelijke
aansprakelijkheid) as provided by Akzo Nobel in respect of
the members of the OBS Group in The Netherlands under
article 2:403 section 1(f) Netherlands Civil Code as
soon as reasonably practicable, but in any event within
6 months after closing of the intended transaction between
Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough.
Note 32
Application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the
United States of America
The OBS Groups combined financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with IFRS which, as applied by the OBS
Group, differs in certain significant respects from US GAAP. The
effects of the application of US GAAP to combined net
income, as determined under IFRS, are set out in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
IFRS profit for the period
attributable to equity holders of OBS Group
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Business combinations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
(b) Pensions and other
postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
(c) Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
(d) Research and development
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
(e) Subsequent events
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
(f) Tax on elimination of
intercompany profits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
(g) Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported under US
GAAP
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The effects of the application of US GAAP to total invested
equity, as determined under IFRS, are set out in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Invested equity, as reported under
IFRS
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
Less: minority interests, as
reported under IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested equity excluding minority
interests, as reported under IFRS
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Business combinations
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
(b) Pensions and other
postretirement benefits
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
(c) Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
(d) Research and development
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
(e) Subsequent events
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
(f) Tax on elimination of
intercompany profits
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
(g) Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested equity, as determined
under US GAAP
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Business
combinations
|
The aggregate adjustment for business combinations presented in
the tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Acquired in-process research
and development
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(2) Application of IFRS 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Acquired
in-process research and development
Under IFRS, in-process research and development acquired in
connection with a business combination is eligible for
capitalization under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, and
IAS 38. Under US GAAP, the attributable fair value of
in-process research and development acquired in a business
combination, and which has no alternative future use, is
expensed as of the acquisition date in accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations,
FIN No. 4, Applicability of FASB Statement
No. 2 to Business Combinations to be Accounted for by the
Purchase Method,
and/or
SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development
Costs.
The adjustment to invested equity included in the tables above
reflects the invested equity impact of immediate write-off of
acquired in-process research and development-related assets
(EUR 5 million and EUR 6 million,
respectively, as of the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005) for US GAAP purposes. The tables also reflect the
reversal of amortization expense
and/or
impairments
F-57
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
(EUR 1 million and EUR 1 million,
respectively, for each of the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005) recorded for IFRS purposes in subsequent periods.
(2) Application
of IFRS 1
IFRS 1, First-Time Adoption of International Financial
Reporting Standards, has been applied by the OBS Group in
preparing its combined financial statements. IFRS 1 generally
requires retrospective application of all IFRS standards that
are effective at the reporting date. However, IFRS 1 permits
certain exemptions and exceptions to this requirement. In
particular, IFRS 1 permits companies who consummated business
combinations prior to the date of their transition to IFRS (for
the OBS Group as of January 1, 2004) to retain the
accounting applied under the accounting principles applied prior
to the adoption of IFRS.
Specifically, for certain business combinations consummated
prior to January 1, 2000, the OBS Group recorded goodwill
resulting from the business combinations directly in invested
equity. From January 1, 2000 through the adoption of
changes in accounting rules prior to the adoption of IFRS, the
OBS Group amortized goodwill. Under US GAAP, for all periods
presented, goodwill is required to be recorded as an asset,
initially subject to periodic amortization (through
December 31, 2001) and subsequently periodic (at least
annual) impairment tests.
Accordingly, this adjustment reflects the reinstatement of
goodwill, net of applicable accumulated amortization and
impairments, for US GAAP purposes as of each of the balance
sheet dates presented.
|
|
(b)
|
Pensions and
other postretirement benefits
|
The aggregate adjustment for pensions and postretirement
benefits presented in the tables above consists of the following
adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Definition of defined
contribution plan
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
(2) Additional minimum pension
liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
(3) Application of IFRS 1 and
other differences
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Definition
of defined contribution plan
Under IAS 19 (Revised), Employee Benefits, an arrangement
qualifies as a defined contribution plan if a companys
legal or constructive obligation is limited to the amount
contributed by it into a separate entity (generally, a fund).
This is the case regardless of whether the fund holds sufficient
assets to pay all employee benefits laid out in the plan
agreement relating to employee service in the current and prior
periods. This definition focuses on the contributions to be made
by the company to the plan as a whole and does not require
individual participant accounts to which contributions would be
made.
Under US GAAP, SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, states that a defined contribution
plan is any arrangement that provides benefits in return for
services rendered, establishes an individual account for each
participant, and specifies how recurring periodic contributions
to the
F-58
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
individuals account are to be determined. Moreover, the
benefits a participant in a defined contribution plan will
receive depend solely on the amount contributed to the
participants account, the return earned on those
contributions, and forfeitures of other participants
benefits that may be allocated to the remaining participant
accounts.
During 2005, Akzo Nobel reached an agreement with the unions on
a change of its pension plan in the Netherlands, in which OBS
Group employees and former employees participate, so that
effective December 31, 2005, it changed from a defined
benefit plan to a defined contribution plan under IFRS, as the
actuarial risks related to the Dutch plan no longer rested with
the OBS Group. However, under US GAAP, SFAS No. 87
specifically prescribes for a defined contribution plan that the
plan provides an individual account for each participant. The
Dutch plan does not provide such individual accounts per
participant as it is a collective defined contribution plan.
Accordingly for US GAAP, under SFAS No. 87 the Dutch
pension plan is still accounted for as a defined benefit plan.
The adjustment to invested equity included in the table above as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005 reflects the re-instatement
of the US GAAP liability for the pension plan in accordance with
SFAS No. 87. The adjustment to net income included in
the tables above for the year ended December 31, 2006
reflects the excess of US GAAP expense calculated in accordance
with SFAS No. 87 over contributions made to plan during the
year. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the adjustment
to net income in the table above reflects the excess of
SFAS No. 87 expense over contributions, offset in 2005
by the gain on termination of EUR 59 million (before
income taxes) recognized upon modification of the plan in 2005
that caused it to be accounted for as a defined contribution
plan for IFRS purposes.
(2) Additional
minimum pension liability
Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), SFAS No. 87 required employers to
report a minimum pension liability in certain circumstances.
Under SFAS No. 87, if the accumulated benefit obligation
(ABO) exceeded the fair value of the plans assets, the
employer was required, at a minimum, to recognize a liability
for that difference. Where required, an additional minimum
pension liability was recognized by recording an intangible
pension asset to the extent of any unrecognized prior service
cost, with a charge through other comprehensive income, net of
any deferred tax benefits, for any excess. The concept of a
minimum pension liability does not exist in IFRS. Following
adoption of SFAS No. 158 (as of December 31,
2006), which requires employers to recognize in full an asset or
a liability for the funded status of its defined benefit plans,
additional minimum pension liabilities are no longer required.
(3) Application
of IFRS 1 and other difference
Under IFRS, the OBS Group accounts for its pension and other
postretirement benefit plans in accordance with IAS 19
(Revised), Employee Benefits. In addition, upon
transition to IFRS as of January 1, 2004 (and in accordance
with IFRS 1), all unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as of
that date were recognized immediately in invested equity, with
an offset to the pension liability. Accordingly, under IFRS, as
of January 1, 2004, the OBS Group had no deferred actuarial
gains or losses. Subsequently, in accordance with IAS 19
(Revised), the OBS Group applied a corridor policy
whereby actuarial gains and losses are deferred when they
initially arise (for those arising after January 1, 2004).
Thereafter, to the extent that unrealized actuarial gains or
losses exceed 10% of the greater of (i) the present value
of the defined benefit obligation and (ii) the fair value
of plan assets, they are recognized in the combined statements
of income through periodic amortization over the expected
remaining working lives of the employees participating in the
plan. Otherwise, they continue to be deferred until they exceed
the corridor described above.
F-59
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Under US GAAP, the OBS Group accounts for its pension and
postretirement benefit plans in accordance with
SFAS No. 87, SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
than Pensions and, as from December 31, 2006,
SFAS No. 158. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 158, the OBS Group applied a
corridor policy also under US GAAP. Following
adoption of SFAS No. 158 from December 31, 2006,
the OBS Group continues to apply a corridor policy with respect
to determination of the income statement charge for any
particular period, but the full funded status of the plan
(defined benefit obligation less plan assets) is now recognized
as a liability in the balance sheet with actuarial gains and
losses recognized directly in invested equity.
In addition to the differences described above (principally
related to the recognition of deferred actuarial gains and
losses directly in invested equity as of January 1, 2004
pursuant to IFRS 1), the OBS Group has also identified
differences related to the measurement date for certain of its
plans. Under IFRS, IAS 19, requires that the calculation of the
pension obligation, as well as the fair value of plan assets, be
determined as of the companys balance sheet date. Under US
GAAP, SFAS No. 87, requires that the plans assets and
obligations be measured either as of the date of the financial
statements or, if used consistently from year to year, as of a
date not more than three months prior to that date. Certain of
the OBS Groups defined benefit plans utilize a September
30 measurement date for US GAAP purposes and a December 31
measurement date for IFRS purposes.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 introduced prescription drug
benefits for retirees as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors
of postretirement healthcare plans, which both began on
January 1, 2006. This reimbursement right under IFRS has
been recognized as an asset under other financial noncurrent
assets in the combined balance sheets and is measured at fair
value. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, these amounts were
EUR 9 million and EUR 12 million,
respectively. Under US GAAP, this reimbursement right is netted
with the postretirement healthcare benefit liability.
In connection with the change in the pension plan in the
Netherlands in 2005, the OBS Group was allocated a portion of
the subordinated loan and loans that are to be redeemed by
retaining employee pension premiums, which have been recorded at
their fair value in other assets under IFRS. For US GAAP
purposes, these items are included in the pension assets at
their nominal value, and accordingly the assets in the IFRS
balance sheet have been reversed. Any difference between the
fair value and the nominal value of the loans has been reversed
for US GAAP.
|
|
(c)
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
Under IFRS, goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at
least annually (and, more frequently, upon the occurrence of a
triggering event) at the cash generating unit (or group of cash
generating units, if that is how goodwill is monitored
internally) level. A cash generating unit is the smallest
identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows from
continuing use and that are largely independent of the cash
inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The goodwill
impairment test is a one-step test that compares the recoverable
amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell or value in
use) of the cash generating unit to its carrying amount, with
any excess of carrying amount over recoverable amount recognized
as an impairment loss. Impairment losses are allocated first to
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the
cash-generating unit (or group of units) and then to the other
assets of the unit (or group of units) pro rata on the basis of
the carrying amount of each asset in the unit (or group of
units). Impairment losses related to goodwill can not be
reversed.
Under US GAAP, goodwill is required to be tested for impairment
at least annually (and, more frequently, upon the occurrence of
a triggering event) at the reporting unit level. A reporting
unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating
segment (referred to as a component). The
F-60
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
goodwill impairment test is a two-step test that compares the
fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the
fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount,
goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If
the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is
performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The
second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied
fair value of reporting unit goodwill, which is determined by
performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation as of the
impairment testing date, to the carrying amount of that
goodwill, with any excess of carrying amount over the implied
fair value recognized as an impairment loss. Impairment losses
related to goodwill can not be reversed.
The cash generating unit is at a lower level in the operation
than the reporting unit and, accordingly, under IFRS an
impairment was recorded that is not reflected under US GAAP. The
adjustment included in the tables above reflects the reversal
for US GAAP of the impairment loss recognized for IFRS purposes
that was not recognized for US GAAP purposes due to this
differing level at which goodwill is tested for impairment (cash
generating unit under IFRS vs. reporting unit under US GAAP).
|
|
(d)
|
Research and
development
|
Under IFRS, payments made to acquire research and
development-related assets outside of a business combination,
and patents or licenses for products that are still in the
research or development stage, are eligible for capitalization
under IAS 38 when all of the following conditions are met:
(i) the project meets the definition of an asset,
(ii) the project is identifiable and (iii) the fair
value of the project can be measured reliably. Accordingly,
under IFRS, certain up-front payments made in connection with
collaboration agreements were capitalized and are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Under US GAAP, payments to acquire research and
development-related assets that have no alternative future use
are expensed as of the acquisition date in accordance with
SFAS No. 2.
The adjustment included in the tables above reflects the
immediate write-off of acquired research and development-related
assets in the period of acquisition (EUR 4 million and
EUR 28 million, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005) and for US GAAP purposes
offset by the reversal of amortization expense
and/or
impairments (EUR 9 million and
EUR 2 million, respectively, for each of the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005) recorded for IFRS
purposes in subsequent periods.
The aggregate adjustment for subsequent events presented in the
tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Subsequent events other than
taxes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
(2) Subsequent events
tax-related
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Under IFRS, the OBS Group has applied IAS 10, Events after
the Balance Sheet Date, and has adjusted its combined
financial statements for adjusting events identified
between the time the parent company financial statements were
issued and the date on which the OBS Groups combined
financial statements were issued.
Under US GAAP, practice with respect to the preparation of
carve-out financial statements is to reflect subsequent events
on a consistent basis with the parent company, as the carve-out
financial statements are an extraction of the parent company
accounts, unless the adjustment represents a correction of an
error. The subsequent events other than
tax-related
adjustments noted above primarily relate to reversals of legal
settlements. More significantly, under IAS 10, through
January 1, 2004, the OBS Group recorded an aggregate
provision of EUR 153 million with respect to various
court cases related to its
Remeron®
product that had been ongoing since 2002. During 2004, the OBS
Group settled certain of these court cases
(EUR 89 million). During 2005, the OBS Group settled
all remaining
Remeron®
court cases (EUR 64 million) which were approved in
November 2005 by the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey. Under US GAAP, the
Remeron®
settlements were recorded in periods consistent with Akzo Nobel.
The subsequent events for the
tax-related
adjustments primarily relate to tax settlements received by the
OBS Group for transfer pricing.
Under US GAAP, the amounts have been recognized in periods
consistent with Akzo Nobel. Accordingly, the subsequent event
adjustments reflected in the IFRS combined financial statements
have been reversed under US GAAP.
|
|
(f)
|
Tax on the
elimination of intercompany profits
|
In accordance with IFRS (IAS 12, Income Taxes), the
deferred tax effect of the elimination of intercompany profit in
inventory is calculated using the purchasers tax rate.
Under US GAAP (SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes), no deferred tax asset is recorded for the difference
between the tax base in the buyers jurisdiction and the
amount reported in the combined financial statements;
additionally, taxes payable on intercompany transfers recognized
by the seller are deferred in consolidation, hence eliminating
the income tax effects of intercompany transfers in the combined
statements of income.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, this resulted in an
increase in net income of EUR 3 million and a decrease
in invested equity at December 31, 2006 of
EUR 37 million. For the year ended December 31,
2005, this resulted in a decrease in net income of
EUR 7 million and a decrease in invested equity at
December 31, 2005 of EUR 40 million.
|
|
(g)
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
The aggregate adjustment for income taxes presented in the
tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Deferred tax on in-process
research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
(2) Other deferred income tax
impacts
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
OBS
GROUP
NOTES TO THE COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
(1) Deferred
income tax on in-process research and development
Under IFRS, a deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for
differences in the financial reporting basis and tax basis of
acquired in-process research and development, similar to other
identifiable intangible assets, irrespective of whether the
acquired in-process research and development has basis for tax
purposes. Under US GAAP
(EITF 96-7,
Accounting for Deferred Taxes on In-Process Research and
Development activities acquired in a Business Combination),
in circumstances where there is no tax basis in the acquired
in-process
research and development deferred taxes are not provided on the
initial difference between the amount assigned for financial
reporting and tax purposes and the
in-process
research and development is charged to expense on a gross basis
(without tax benefit) at acquisition. In circumstances where a
tax basis exists for the acquired
in-process
research and development, upon consummation of the business
combination, the
in-process
research and development is immediately charged to expense, a
deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that
realizability is more likely than not.
The deferred tax liability recorded under IFRS results in a
corresponding increase to goodwill. Although this difference
does not affect invested equity (between IFRS and US GAAP) at
the acquisition date, a reclassification adjustment is necessary
under US GAAP to reduce goodwill by the amount of the deferred
tax liability recorded under IFRS in relation to acquired
in-process research and development and to reduce deferred tax
liabilities by a corresponding amount (EUR 8 million).
The impact on income tax expense of this difference when the
acquired in-process research and development is amortized or
impaired for IFRS purposes is reversed under US GAAP.
(2) Other
deferred income tax impacts
This adjustment reflects the deferred tax effects attributable
to the aforementioned pre-tax adjustments.
|
|
(h)
|
Other
presentation differences
|
Deferred
income taxes
Under IFRS, deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified
as non-current on the balance sheet based on the timing of their
expected reversal.
Under US GAAP, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
classified as current or non-current on the balance sheet based
on the nature of the balance sheet item to which they relate
(e.g. deferred taxes related to fixed assets are classified as
non-current irrespective of when the underlying temporary
difference is expected to reverse). Where no related asset or
liability exists (e.g. for net operating losses), deferred tax
assets or liabilities are classified as current or non-current
on the balance sheet based on the timing of their expected
reversal.
Oss, July 30, 2007
The Board of Management
Toon Wilderbeek
F-63
Independent
Auditors Report
The Board of
Management
Organon BioSciences N. V.
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the
OBS Group, as defined in Note 1 to the combined financial
statements, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related combined statements of income, invested equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the
three-year
period ended December 31, 2006. These combined financial
statements are the responsibility of the Organon BioSciences
N.V.s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these combined financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S.). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the OBS
Groups internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting policies used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the OBS Group as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the
three-year
period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union (E.U.).
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
E.U. vary in certain significant respects from U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Information relating to the
nature and effect of such differences is presented in
Note 32 to the combined financial statements.
/s/ KPMG Accountants
N.V.
KPMG Accountants N. V.
Eindhoven, the Netherlands
July 30, 2007
F-64
OBS Group
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in
millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Note
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Selling and distribution expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
Other operating (expense)/income
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Operating income less net
financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Share of profit of associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the OBS Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed combined
interim financial statements.
F-65
OBS Group
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in
millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Financial non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
investments in
associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from related parties,
net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners net investment
(including cumulative translation reserves)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total invested equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total invested equity and
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed combined
interim financial statements.
F-66
OBS Group
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in
millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
earnings to cash generated from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on divestments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Share of profits of associates
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in deferred taxes
(non-cash recognized in income)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions expense (non-cash
recognized in income)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense funded by Akzo
Nobel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate overhead costs funded by
Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance expense funded by Akzo
Nobel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment costs funded
by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows before
changes in working capital and provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in trade and other
receivables
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in other
non-current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in trade and
other payables and provisions
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) income tax
payable and receivable, net
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash generated from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associates and
repayments of loans by associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Dividends paid to Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share premium repayment
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash transfers (to)/from Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in borrowings
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
June 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited
condensed combined interim financial statements.
F-67
OBS Group
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN INVESTED EQUITY
(Amounts in millions of euros)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners
Net
|
|
Translation
|
|
Minority
|
|
Total Invested
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Reserves
|
|
Interest
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
2006
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
Changes in exchange rates in
respect of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(expense) recognized
directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income/(expenses)
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
Contributions attributed
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest expense
funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Corporate overhead
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Insurance expense
funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Tax transfers from
Akzo Nobel, net
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Employee benefits and
other non-cash transfers, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Cash transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Balance as of June 30,
2006
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1,
2007
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
Changes in exchange rates in
respect of foreign operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(expense) recognized
directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Profit for the period
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income/(expenses)
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
Share premium repayment
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Contributions attributed
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment
costs funded by Akzo Nobel
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Employee benefits and
other non-cash transfers, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Cash transfers to Akzo
Nobel, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Non-cash transfers to
Akzo Nobel, net
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30,
2007
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
unaudited
condensed combined interim financial statements.
F-68
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(All amounts in
millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 1
Business and Basis of Presentation
Business
In these combined interim financial statements, the human
healthcare business and animal healthcare business activities of
Akzo Nobel N.V. (Akzo Nobel) are together referred
to as the healthcare activities and references to
the OBS Group or Company mean those
operating companies and other subsidiaries of Akzo Nobel that
undertook the human and animal healthcare activities during the
relevant period covered by the combined financial statements.
The OBS Group is headquartered in Oss, The Netherlands.
The human healthcare business, Organon, specializes in the
discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of
prescription medicines and products. Its core therapeutic areas
of expertise are contraception, fertility, hormone therapy,
mental health and anesthesia. Additionally, the Organon business
includes Nobilon, a biotechnology company dedicated to exploring
opportunities in the field of human vaccines.
The animal healthcare business, Intervet, offers a full range of
veterinary vaccines and pharmaceuticals for a variety of animal
species including poultry, pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, horses,
cats, dogs and fish.
Following the announcement by Akzo Nobel that it intends to
separate its healthcare activities from the Akzo Nobel Group,
Akzo Nobel incorporated Organon BioSciences N.V. (OBS
N.V.) on September 1, 2006 as a public company with
limited liability (naamloze vennootschap)
incorporated under the laws of The Netherlands with an
authorized share capital of EUR 225 thousand and an issued
share capital of EUR 45 thousand.
On September 30, 2006 Akzo Nobel contributed to OBS N.V.,
through a contribution in kind, the shares of the two subholding
companies, Organon BioSciences International B.V. and Organon
BioSciences Nederland B.V., in exchange for 24,955,000 ordinary
shares of OBS N.V. with a nominal value of EUR 1.00 (one
euro) per share. As per the date of this contribution, OBS N.V.
had an authorized share capital of EUR 125 million and
an issued share capital of EUR 25 million.
On March 12, 2007,
Schering-Plough
Corporation
(Schering-Plough)
announced that its board of directors approved a transaction
under which it will acquire OBS N.V. from Akzo Nobel.
These combined financial statements were authorized on
July 30, 2007 by the Board of Directors of OBS N.V.
Basis of
Presentation
These combined financial statements reflect all of the assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash flows of the OBS
Group. The significant legal entities forming part of the OBS
Group are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
|
Legal
Entity
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Organon BioSciences N.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon BioSciences Nederland
B.V.(*)
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon BioSciences International
B.V. (**)
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet International B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet International GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet UK Ltd
|
|
U.K.
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
F-69
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of
|
|
|
|
Legal
Entity
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Laboratories Intervet S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Hydrochemie GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Australia Pty Ltd
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Deutschland GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Innovation GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet do Brasil Veterinaria
Ltda(***)
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Mexico S.A. de CV
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Productions S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Pharma R&D S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%.
|
Intervet (Italia) S.r.l
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet UK Production Ltd
|
|
UK
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Holding B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet Nederland B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Intervet KK
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Nobilon International B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
N.V. Organon
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon (Ireland) Ltd. (****)
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon International Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon USA Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon S.A.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Nippon Organon KK
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Laboratories Ltd.
|
|
UK
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Espanola S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Italia S.p.A.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon do Brasil Indústria e
Comercio Ltda
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Ilaclari A.S
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Holding B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Nederland B.V
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Organon Canada Ltd.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Multilan AG
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Diosynth RTP Inc.
|
|
USA
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Formerly Akzo Nobel Pharma B.V. |
|
(**) |
|
Formerly Akzo Nobel Pharma International B.V. |
|
(***) |
|
Represent the Intervet division of Akzo Nobel Ltda, the combined
financial statements only include those assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenses and cash flows of this legal entity that
pertain directly to healthcare activities. In June 2006 the
Intervet division of this legal entity was incorporated in a
separate entity (Intervet do Brasil Veterinaria Ltda), which is
indirectly 100% owned by OBS N.V. The remaining business of Akzo
Nobel Ltda is not related to healthcare activities and are not
part of the spin-off healthcare activities. |
|
(****) |
|
Including Organon Ireland Swiss Branch |
These combined financial statements exclude the assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Akzo Nobel
legal entities (and divisions thereof) not relating to the
healthcare activities.
F-70
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the OBS Group
divested Crina S.A., one of the remaining feed additives
businesses held in the portfolio. These combined interim
financial statements reflect the revenues, expenses, and cash
flows of this business up to the date of divestment.
The OBS Group has historically operated as an integrated part of
Akzo Nobel and within the Akzo Nobel infrastructure. However,
these combined interim financial statements have been prepared
on a carve-out basis from the consolidated financial
statements of Akzo Nobel to represent the financial position and
performance of the OBS Group as if the OBS Group has
existed, as of and during the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, and as if International Accounting Standard
(IAS) 27, Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements have been applied through out. The
combined financial statements included herein may not
necessarily be indicative of the OBS Groups financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows had the
OBS Group operated as a separate entity during the periods
presented or for future periods.
As described above, these combined interim financial statements
reflect the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and cash
flows of the OBS Group. Under the carve-out
basis of preparation, these combined interim financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006
include allocations for various expenses, including corporate
administrative expenses, as well as an allocation of certain
assets and liabilities historically maintained by Akzo Nobel,
but not recorded in the accounts of the OBS Group. These
include, among other things, corporate overhead, interest
expense, certain deferred and current income tax assets and
liabilities, liabilities for certain compensation plans and
contingent liabilities. The various allocation methodologies for
corporate expenses, insurance, interest expense, share based
payments, and pension and postretirement expenses are discussed
in Notes 3, 3, 6, 11, and 12, respectively. Management of
the OBS Group considers that such allocations have been
made on a reasonable basis, but may not necessarily be
indicative of the costs that could have been incurred if the
OBS Group had operated on a stand-alone basis. After
January 1, 2007, some of the finance and supporting
corporate activities are no longer being provided by Akzo Nobel.
As a result, only those expenses relating to issues maintained
at Akzo Nobel are included in the combined financial statements
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Through December 2006, Akzo Nobel used a centralized approach to
manage cash and to finance the OBS Groups operations.
As a result, certain debt and cash and cash equivalents
maintained at Akzo Nobel are not included in the combined
interim balance sheet at December 31, 2006. The combined
statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2006
includes an allocation of Akzo Nobels interest expense as
discussed in Note 6. The OBS Groups financing
requirements are represented by cash transactions with Akzo
Nobel and are reflected in invested equity in the combined
balance sheet at December 31, 2006.
The invested equity balance in these combined interim financial
statements of the OBS Group constitutes Akzo Nobels
investment in the OBS Group and represents the excess of
total assets over total liabilities until December 31,
2006. Invested equity includes the effects of carve-out
allocations from Akzo Nobel and the funding of the
OBS Groups operations through the in-house banking
and cash pooling arrangements and loans to and from related
parties with Akzo Nobel, and the OBS Groups
cumulative net income, including income directly recognized in
equity. After February 28, 2007, Akzo Nobel no longer
provided financing support for the OBS Groups operations,
other than via the related party loan and as a result, there are
no cash transactions with Akzo Nobel reflected in invested
equity in the combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.
Invested equity does not constitute any contract that evidences
a residual interest in the assets after deducting liabilities to
which reference is made in IAS 32, Financial Statements:
Disclosure and Presentation.
F-71
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Prior to January 1, 2007 certain OBS Group companies were
located in countries where they were included in the tax
grouping of other Akzo Nobel entities within the respective
entitys tax jurisdiction. The current tax payable or
receivable of these OBS Group companies represents the
income tax amount to be paid to or to be received from the
country tax leading holding company of Akzo Nobel. For the
purpose of these combined interim financial statements it is
assumed that only the current period is outstanding.
The combined statements of cash flows have been prepared under
the indirect method in accordance with the requirements of
IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements. The combined statement
of cash flows exclude currency translation differences, which
arise as a result of translating the assets and liabilities of
non-Euro companies to euros at period-end exchange rates (except
for those arising on cash and cash equivalents) and have been
adjusted for non-cash transactions.
Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group have identified certain issues and
areas that in preparation of and following the separation
require mutually agreeable arrangements between them. These
issues and areas have been included in a separation agreement,
which was signed on February 28, 2007. Note 20
provides further explanation on the separation agreement.
As a result of the foregoing, among other things, the combined
financial statements included herein may not necessarily be
indicative of the OBS Groups financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows had the OBS Group
operated on a stand-alone basis during the periods presented, or
for future periods. Further, the combined financial statements
do not reflect the financial impact of the actual separation of
the OBS Group from Akzo Nobel on a stand alone basis.
The combined interim financial statements of the OBS Group have
been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim
Financial Reporting. The combined financial statements as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are
unaudited; however, in the opinion of the OBS Groups
management, the unaudited combined interim financial statements
reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the combined financial position, the combined
results of operations and the combined cash flows of the
OBS Group as of the dates and for the periods presented.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union (IFRS) have been condensed or
omitted. IFRS as applied by the OBS Group does not differ from
IFRS as provided by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB). Although the OBS Group believes that
the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented
not misleading, these unaudited combined financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited combined interim
financial statements and the notes thereto for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
The OBS Groups business is not significantly impacted
by seasonality. However, the results of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 should not be taken as
indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for
the full year.
These combined interim financial statements are presented in
euro, which is the functional currency of OBS N.V. and the
OBS Group. All amounts are in millions of euros except headcount
or unless otherwise stated. IFRS as applied by the OBS Group
differs in certain significant respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(US GAAP). The effects of the application of
US GAAP are disclosed in Note 21.
Note 2
Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting policies applied by the OBS Group in the
preparation of the accompanying combined interim financial
statements are the same as those applied by the OBS Group
in its
F-72
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
combined financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The OBS Group has not implemented
any new IFRS accounting standards for the six months ended
June 30, 2007.
Foreign
currency translation
The main exchange rates against euros used in the preparation of
the combined balance sheets and the combined statements of
income are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
Statements
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
of
Income
|
|
|
Balance
Sheets
|
|
For the
Six-Months
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
USD
|
|
|
1.345
|
|
|
|
1.317
|
|
|
|
1.328
|
|
|
|
1.229
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
0.672
|
|
|
|
0.671
|
|
|
|
0.675
|
|
|
|
0.689
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
1.657
|
|
|
|
1.607
|
|
|
|
1.635
|
|
|
|
1.567
|
|
Note 3
Related Parties
The combined interim financial statements include transactions
with related parties. The OBS Group entered into transactions
with Akzo Nobel and its subsidiaries. Furthermore, Akzo Nobel
provided corporate services for the combined financial
statements periods presented. Management believes that product
transfers between OBS Group and Akzo Nobel Group were made at
arms length prices. On February 28, 2007, Akzo Nobel
and the OBS Group entered into a
EUR 1.150 billion loan. Under the loan agreement, the
maturity date of the loan is December 31,2007 and the loan
bears an interest rate of
6-months
EURIBOR + 0.15% that accrues on the amount owed, from
March 1, 2007 to the date of payment (both days inclusive).
The entire principal amount of the loan not yet repaid to Akzo
Nobel shall be due for immediate payment without any further
notification or formality being required should, amongst other
matters any other indebtedness of the OBS Group become due
and payable prior to its specified maturity by reason of any
default by the OBS Group in the due performance or
observance of any obligation relating thereto, unless such
indebtedness is not material in the context of the loan
agreement. The loan is included in payables to related parties
in the combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.
In the six month period ended June 30 2007, the
OBS Group made several cash loans to Akzo Nobel totalling
EUR 376 million on terms substantially equivalent to
the terms of the aforesaid related party loan. These cash loans
are included in receivables from related parties in the combined
balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.
Sales and purchases of goods and services to and from Akzo Nobel
and its subsidiaries were not significant for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. At June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the OBS Group had receivables from
Akzo Nobel and its subsidiaries of EUR 377 million and
EUR 11 million, respectively. These amounts are
reflected in receivables from related parties in the combined
balance sheets. At June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, the OBS Group had payables to Akzo Nobel and its
subsidiaries of EUR 1,163 million and
EUR 5 million, respectively. These amounts are
reflected in payables to related parties in the combined balance
sheets.
F-73
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
In addition, the OBS Group purchases and sells goods and
services to and from two other related parties in which the OBS
Group holds less than a 50% equity interest (associates). Such
transactions were not significant on an individual or aggregate
basis for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
These transactions were conducted at arms length with
terms comparable to transactions with third parties.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 include allocated corporate and regional
costs from Akzo Nobel approximating EUR 14 million.
These costs are primarily related to Akzo Nobels corporate
administrative services to the OBS Group, and are generally
allocated based on a combination of the ratio of the OBS
Groups annual revenues, gross profit, and property, plant,
and equipment, to Akzo Nobels comparable consolidated
revenues, gross profit, and property, plant, and equipment.
Management considers that such allocations have been made on a
reasonable basis, but may not necessarily be indicative of the
costs had the OBS Group operated as a separate entity during the
periods presented. In addition, Akzo Nobel has incurred specific
costs that are directly related to the OBS Group. These costs
have been allocated to the OBS Group based upon actual costs
incurred by Akzo Nobel. For the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006, these direct related expenses amounted to nil and
EUR 1 million respectively.
Through December 31, 2006, Akzo Nobel incurred certain
insurance costs on behalf of the OBS Group. These costs
primarily included insurance premiums, costs related to
insurance claims and certain administrative (insurance)
services. Akzo Nobels in-house insurance department acts
as an in-house insurer that incurs the risk partially by
themselves as well as insuring the risk partially with third
party insurance companies. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006, Akzo Nobel had allocated
EUR 14 million to the OBS Group for total insurance
expenses. These costs have been allocated based on the risk
profiles of the OBS Group compared to the risk profiles of other
Akzo Nobel businesses. The risk profiles used were based on the
nature and operations of the various subsidiaries that are
included in the OBS Group. Management considers that such
allocations have been made on a reasonable basis, but may not
necessarily be indicative of the costs had the OBS Group
operated as a separate entity. As of January 1, 2007, the
OBS Group has its own insurance department which acts as an
in-house insurer as well as insures risks partially with third
party insurance companies and Akzo Nobels in-house
insurance department acts as an insurance broker on behalf of
the OBS Group for an annual fixed fee.
Through December 31, 2006, some of the OBS Group entities
formed part of a fiscal unity headed by another Akzo Nobel
company. In these instances, the Akzo Nobel tax leading company
filed the tax return and settled the taxes with the respective
OBS Group in that country. The income tax provisions related to
the these OBS Group companies were calculated using a method as
if these OBS Group companies had filed a separate tax return. As
of January 1, 2007, the OBS is solely responsible for the
filing and settlement of its companies tax returns. See
Note 20, Incorporation and Separation, for tax settlements
of the OBS Group for prior years which have been indemnified by
Akzo Nobel.
Through December 31, 2006, Akzo Nobel used a centralized
approach to manage cash and to finance the OBS Groups
operations. As a result, certain debt and cash and cash
equivalents maintained at Akzo Nobel were not included in the
combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. The
OBS Groups funding from Akzo Nobel through in-house
banking and cash pooling and loans to and from related parties
with Akzo Nobel were reflected in invested equity in the
combined balance sheet at December 31, 2006. As of
January 1, 2007, Akzo Nobel no longer provides financing
support for the OBS Groups operations other than via
the related party loan, and therefore there are no such cash
transactions reflected in invested equity in the combined
balance sheet as of
F-74
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
June 30, 2007. All cash and cash equivalents reflected in
these combined financial statements at June 30, 2007 belong
to legal entities of the OBS Group.
The combined statement of income for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 includes an allocation of Akzo Nobels
interest expense of EUR 15 million. The allocation was
principally based on the daily average outstanding cash balance
funded to the OBS Group through Akzo Nobels cash
accounts using a rate applicable to the underlying currency.
While interest expense has been allocated, there was no debt
specific to the OBS Group; therefore, no allocation of Akzo
Nobels general corporate debt has been made in the
combined balance sheet at December 31, 2006 as all
transactions with Akzo Nobel were settled via invested equity.
There were no such interest allocations for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 as Akzo Nobel no longer finances the
OBS Groups operations other than via the related
party loan. The combined statement of income for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 includes EUR 18 million of
interest expense related to the aforementioned related party
loan provided by Akzo Nobel on February 28, 2007.
Prior to January 1, 2007, the OBS Group entered into
derivative contracts with Akzo Nobel to manage the
OBS Groups foreign currency risk. At
December 31, 2006 the outstanding contracts with Akzo Nobel
to buy currencies had notional values of
EUR 21 million while contracts with Akzo Nobel to sell
currencies had notional values of EUR 57 million. As
of January 1, 2007, the OBS Groups treasury
department enters into its own derivative contracts with third
parties.
The OBS Group had various net loan receivables with Akzo
Nobel which amounted to EUR 289 million and were
included in invested equity in the combined balance sheet at
December 31, 2006. These loans had interest at rates
ranging from 3.9% to 4.0% in 2006. There were no such loans
included in invested equity as of June 30, 2007.
In the ordinary course of business, the OBS Group has
transactions with various organizations with which certain of
the members of its Board of Management are associated, but no
transactions were conducted in 2006 or for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. Likewise, there have been no transactions
with members of the Board of Management, any other senior
management personnel or any family member of such persons. Also,
no loans have been extended to members of the Board of
Management, any other senior management personnel or any family
member of such persons. Certain members of the
OBS Groups Board of Management are also members of
Akzo Nobels Board of Management.
Guarantees
Through December 31, 2006, Akzo Nobel was jointly and
severally liable for contractual debts of certain Dutch
OBS Group companies included in these combined financial
statements. These debts, provisions, and payables, at
December 31, 2006, aggregated to EUR 221 million
and are included in the combined balance sheet as of
December 31, 2006. In addition, Akzo Nobel issued
guarantees on behalf of the OBS Group companies in the
amount of EUR 221 million and
EUR 252 million as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively including guarantees issued
by Akzo Nobel in relation to the filing exemption for certain
Irish companies under section 5(c) of the Companies
(Amendment) Act 1986 Ireland.
As of January 1, 2007, Akzo Nobel established an umbrella
facility of EUR 80 million on behalf of the
OBS Group for guarantees issued by the OBS Group. The
OBS Group issued guarantees of EUR 71 million to
third parties during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Note 4
Segment Information
Segment information is presented in respect of the
OBS Groups business segments. The primary segment
reporting is based on the business segments of the
OBS Group, whereby the business
F-75
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
segments are engaged in providing products or services which are
subject to risks and rewards which differ from the risks and
rewards of the other segments. In determining whether products
and services are related, aspects such as the nature of the
products or services, the nature of the production processes,
and the type or class of customers and end users, for the
products or services are taken into consideration. Segments
reported are Organon and Intervet which also reflects the
management structure of the OBS Group. The secondary
segment reporting is based on the geographical areas in which
the OBS Group operates, whereby segment revenue is based on the
geographical location of customers and segment assets are based
on the geographical location of the assets.
The identification of segments is based on the way the business
units are currently managed (composition of management teams and
responsibilities) as well as the content of management
information used to allocate resources within the business
units. The risks and rates of return are affected predominately
by differences in its businesses, Organon and Intervet, and not
by the fact that the OBS Group operates in different
countries.
Segment revenues and results include items directly attributable
to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a
reasonable basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from
|
|
Group
|
|
Operating
|
|
Profit of
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Third
Parties
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Income
|
|
Associates
|
|
and
Amortization
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Organon
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Intervet
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5
Other Operating (Expense) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Results on sale of redundant assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency exchange differences
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results on divestments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other income/(expense)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
In 2006, the results on divestments of EUR 6 million
relate to the gain on Intervets divestment of one of its
feed additives businesses, Crina.
|
|
Note 6
|
Financial Expense
and Income
|
Through December 31, 2006, Akzo Nobel used a centralized
approach for cash management and to finance its operations.
Through December 31, 2006, cash deposits were remitted to
Akzo Nobel on
F-76
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
a regular basis and reflected within invested equity in the
combined balance sheet. Similarly, the OBS Groups
cash disbursements were funded through Akzo Nobels cash
accounts.
As a result, certain debt and cash and cash equivalents
maintained by Akzo Nobel were not included in the combined
balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. The OBS Groups
financing requirements were represented by cash transactions
with Akzo Nobel and were reflected in invested equity in the
combined balance sheet at December 31, 2006.
Through December 31, 2006, interest expense allocations
from Akzo Nobel were allocated principally based on the daily
average outstanding cash balance funded to the OBS Group through
Akzo Nobels cash accounts using a rate applicable to the
underlying currency, which ranged from 1.0% to 7.7% for the six
months ended June 30, 2006. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006 interest expense of EUR 15 million
had been allocated to the OBS Group and is included in the
combined interim statement of income.
In addition through December 31, 2006, management had
determined that no debt maintained at the Akzo Nobel group level
related specifically or entirely to the OBS Group businesses,
nor did the OBS Group guarantee or pledge its assets as
collateral for Akzo Nobels debt. As such, management felt
that there was no need to push down debt to the combined
financial statements of the OBS Group at December 31, 2006.
Nevertheless, as described above, interest expense had been
allocated and reflected in the combined financial statements of
the OBS Group because the OBS Group did receive cash advances
from Akzo Nobel.
As of February 28, 2007, Akzo Nobel no longer provides
financing to the OBS Group other than via the related party loan
and as such, there are no longer any loans from/to Akzo Nobel
included in invested equity in the combined balance sheet as of
June 30, 2007. The OBS Group enters into financing
arrangements with third parties on its own behalf and reflects
those as liabilities in the combined balance sheet. The actual
interest expense incurred in conjunction with these borrowings
has been reflected in the combined interim statement of income.
Interest expense of EUR 22 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 is related to the aforementioned
EUR 1.150 billion loan with Akzo Nobel.
Financial expense and income consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
related parties
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Interest expenses other
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
related parties
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Interest expense is reduced by EUR 1 million and nil
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, due to interest capitalized on capital investment
projects under construction.
F-77
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 7
Taxes
Profit before tax amounted to EUR 303 million and
EUR 265 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 respectively. Tax (charges)/benefits are included
in the combined interim statement of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax on operating income less
financing costs
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Tax associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
The classification of current and deferred tax
(charges)/benefits in the combined statement of income is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the six month
period
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for prior
periods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Deferred tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
origination and
reversal of temporary differences
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
tax losses not
recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the statutory tax rate in the Netherlands
to the effective combined tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate in The
Netherlands
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Effect of different rates in
foreign countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Adjustments for prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is probable that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods
in which those temporary differences become deductible.
Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning
strategies in making this assessment. The amount of the deferred
tax assets considered realizable, however, could change in the
near term if future estimates of projected taxable income during
the carry-forward period are revised.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there
is a legally enforceable right to set off tax assets against tax
liabilities and when the deferred tax assets and liabilities
relate to the same tax authority.
F-78
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The movement in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the
periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Rates
|
|
in
Income
|
|
Other
|
|
2007
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other provisions
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset/liabilities
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Rates
|
|
in
Income
|
|
Other
|
|
2006
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other provisions
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset/liabilities
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
Classification of the deferred tax assets and liabilities in the
combined balance sheets, which is determined at the fiscal
entity level, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Income tax receivable and payable have been offset in cases
where there is a legally enforceable right to set off current
tax asset against current tax liability and when the intention
exists to settle on a net basis or to realize the receivable and
payable simultaneously.
Income tax receivable of EUR 26 million and
EUR 74 million at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively, represents the amount of
income taxes recoverable in respect of current and prior
F-79
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
periods. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
income tax receivable from Akzo Nobel entities of nil and
EUR 15 million respectively are included in the income
tax receivable in the combined balance sheets.
Income tax payable of EUR 131 million and
EUR 133 million at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively, relates to the amount of
taxes payable for current and prior periods to the tax
authorities.
Note 8
Inventories, net
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
EUR 2 million and EUR 11 million,
respectively, were recognized in the combined interim statements
of income for the write-down of inventories to its net
realizable value, while EUR 1 million and
EUR 4 million, respectively, of write-downs were
reversed in the period of sale. There are no inventories subject
to retention or title clauses.
Additionally, for the six-months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, the OBS Group recorded an expense in the combined interim
statements of income of EUR 30 million and
EUR 26 million, respectively, related to the
impairment of obsolete inventories.
Note 9
Trade and Other Receivables, net
Trade receivables are shown net of impairment losses of
EUR 12 million and EUR 15 million at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the OBS Group
recorded net additions and reversals of impairment losses of nil
and EUR 2 million in the combined interim statements
of income, respectively.
Note 10
Invested Equity
Prior to January 1, 2007, the invested equity balance in
the combined financial statements of the OBS Group constitutes
Akzo Nobels investment in the OBS Group and represent the
excess of total assets over total liabilities. Invested equity
includes the effects of carve-out allocations from Akzo Nobel
and the funding of the OBS Group activities through the in-house
banking and cash pooling and loans from and to related parties
with Akzo Nobel, and the OBS Groups cumulative net income,
including income directly recognized in invested equity. As of
February 28, 2007, Akzo Nobel no longer provides financing
support for the OBS Groups operations other than via the
related party loan and as a result, there are no such cash
transactions with Akzo Nobel nor allocations from Akzo Nobel
reflected in the invested equity in the combined balance sheet
as of June 30, 2007. Invested equity does not constitute
any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets
after deducting liabilities.
Cumulative
translation reserves
The cumulative translation reserves comprise all foreign
currency differences arising from the translation of the OBS
Groups financial statements of net investments in foreign
subsidiaries.
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated
into euros at exchange rates on the balance sheet date. Revenues
and expenses are translated into euros at rates approximating
the foreign exchange rates ruling at the dates of the
transactions. Exchange differences resulting from translation
into euros of invested equities and of intercompany loans of a
permanent nature with respect to subsidiaries outside the Euro
region are recorded within invested equity. Upon disposal or
liquidation of a foreign entity, these cumulative translation
adjustments are recognized as income or expense.
F-80
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
A description of the amounts recorded in invested equity is as
follows:
Share-based
payment costs funded by Akzo Nobel
The share-based payment costs funded by Akzo Nobel represent
share-based payment expenses, allocated to the OBS Group, based
on the actual OBS Group employees who participate in the Akzo
Nobel share plans. See Note 11.
Interest
expense funded by Akzo Nobel
The interest expense funded by Akzo Nobel represents interest
charges allocated to the OBS Group based on average levels of
funding provided to the OBS Group by Akzo Nobel. See Note 3
and Note 6.
Corporate
overhead costs funded by Akzo Nobel
The corporate overhead costs funded by Akzo Nobel represents an
allocation of charges to the OBS Group incurred by Akzo Nobel
for various corporate administrative costs, on behalf of the
business units of the OBS Group. See Note 3.
Insurance
expense funded by Akzo Nobel
The insurance expense funded by Akzo Nobel represents insurance
expenses incurred by Akzo Nobel on behalf of the OBS Group that
have been allocated to the OBS Group. See Note 3.
Tax transfers
from/(to) Akzo Nobel
The tax transfers from/(to) Akzo Nobel represent intercompany
tax payments and settlements, from and to the OBS Group and the
Akzo Nobel tax leading holding companies.
Employee
benefits and other non-cash transfers
These amounts primarily represent allocations of employee
benefit related assets and liabilities in regard of pension
plans accounted for by Akzo Nobel on behalf of the OBS Group.
Cash transfers
from/(to) Akzo Nobel
The cash transfers from/(to) Akzo Nobel consist of group
contributions from or to Akzo Nobel, capital contributions
funded by Akzo Nobel, the net movement of funding by Akzo Nobel
and intra group movements. As of December 31, 2006,
invested equity includes EUR 1,049 million of funding
by Akzo Nobel which does not have the characteristics of debt.
Also, as of December 31, 2006, invested equity includes
EUR 289 million of net loans due from and due to
related parties.
Note 11
Share-Based Payments
Akzo Nobel sponsors the following stock options plans and share
plans in which certain employees of the OBS Group participate.
As the share-based payment plans are Akzo Nobel plans, amounts
have been recognized through invested equity.
Stock Option
Plans
Akzo Nobel grants options to all members of the Board of
Management, senior vice presidents and executives. Stock options
granted cliff-vest and are exercisable after three years. The
options granted to senior vice presidents and executives expire
after five years and options granted from 2002 onwards expire
after seven years. Options granted to members of the Board of
Management from 2000 expire after ten years and options granted
from 2003 onwards expire after seven years. All
F-81
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
outstanding options issued from 1999 cannot be exercised during
the first three years. One option entitles the holder thereof to
buy one Akzo Nobel N.V. common share or one American Depository
Share (ADS). The exercise price is the Euronext
Amsterdam opening price on the first day that the Akzo Nobel
share is quoted ex dividend or the opening price for an ADS on
NASDAQ/NMS on the first day that the Akzo Nobel ADS is quoted ex
dividend. Also, for the options granted since 2005, certain
economic value added performance criteria are included in the
vesting conditions. Through June 30, 2005, the option
holder could also request that the option be cash settled.
Since 2005, Akzo Nobel grants performance related stock options
to executives. Under this plan, executives are granted a
conditional number of options, under shareholder approval, whose
vesting is conditional on the achievement of financial
performance targets, expressed as Economic Value Added on
Invested Capital (EOI). The percentage of granted,
contingent options that vest depends on Akzo Nobels
average EOI over a three-year period. One option entitles the
holder thereof to buy one Akzo Nobel N.V. common share or one
ADS. The option holder can also request that the option be cash
settled.
These option plans could be cash settled through July 1,
2005, and were modified as of this date to be share settled. The
fair value of employee service received in return for share
options granted are measured by reference to the fair value of
share options granted. Until July 1, 2005, the OBS Group
recognized at each balance sheet the fair value of the options
outstanding per that date, taking into account the passage of
time of the three-year vesting period. The change in this fair
value was recognized in income. Compensation expense of
EUR 1 million and EUR 1 million has been
recognized under these plans for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Performance
Share Plan (Executives and Board of Management)
In 2004, Akzo Nobel introduced a conditional performance stock
option plan for the Board of Management and on January 1,
2005 for executives. Under this plan, members of the Board of
Management and executives were granted a conditional number of
shares. The vesting of the shares is conditional on the
achievement of performance targets, expressed as Total
Shareholder Return (TSR) of Akzo Nobel, relative to
the TSR of a group of competitors during the relative
performance period. The percentage of granted, contingent shares
that vest depends on Akzo Nobels TSR, relative to those of
competitors, achieved during the three-year vesting period. The
awards will be satisfied by the delivery of Akzo Nobel N.V.
shares, or in exceptional cases, by means of a cash payment.
Due to the performance criteria of the share plan, the OBS Group
bases compensation expense on the best available estimate of the
number of shares that are expected to vest and revises that
estimate, if necessary, if subsequent information indicates that
actual forfeitures are likely to differ from initial estimates.
Management expects the conditional shares granted to vest based
on available information. Expense of EUR 1 million and
EUR 1 million has been recognized during the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, Akzo Nobel has
conditionally decided to settle the outstanding 2006 and earlier
awards based on the stock price of Akzo Nobel at the day of the
closing of the transaction with
Schering-Plough.
The settlement of these awards is conditional on the closing of
the transaction with
Schering-Plough
and will take place in the month after the closing date. Akzo
Nobel remains as the administrator and sponsor of the plans, and
any expenses related to the OBS Group will be accounted for by
the OBS Group. Further, Akzo Nobel did not issue any new awards
during 2007 to OBS Group employees, however, awards conditional
on the closing of the transaction,
F-82
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
were granted to OBS Group executives. These awards will be
settled in cash, subsequent to the closing, in June 2008.
Akzo Nobel has estimated that the total conditional settlement
would approximate EUR 9 million, of which 50% will be
paid by
Schering-Plough,
based on current factors. No cash payments will be made by Akzo
Nobel until the close of the transaction with
Schering-Plough.
An additional expense of EUR 2 million has been recognized
in the combined statement of income for this change for the six
months ended June 30, 2007.
The following is a summary of activity pertaining to the OBS
Group employees that participated in the various Akzo Nobel
stock option and share plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Depository
|
Outstanding
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
1,217,079
|
|
|
|
158,020
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
230,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(223,340
|
)
|
|
|
(56,760
|
)
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(93,632
|
)
|
|
|
(3,640
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30,
2006
|
|
|
1,130,752
|
|
|
|
97,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
1,099,659
|
|
|
|
89,080
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(446,451
|
)
|
|
|
(64,140
|
)
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(19,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30,
2007
|
|
|
634,038
|
|
|
|
24,940
|
|
The following is a summary of activity pertaining to the OBS
Group executives and Board of Management that participated in
the Akzo Nobel performance share plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Share Plan
|
|
|
(Executives and
Board
|
Outstanding
|
|
of
Management)
|
|
Balance at June 30,
2006
|
|
|
686,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30,
2007
|
|
|
696,902
|
|
Fair value and
assumptions used
The expected value of performance stock options for the Board of
Management and executives is based on a binomial lattice option
pricing model, using certain assumptions. These assumptions were
used for these calculations only, and do not necessarily
represent an indication of managements expectations of
future developments. In addition, option valuation models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including
expected share price volatility. The OBS Groups employee
stock options have characteristics significantly different from
those of traded options and changes in the subjective
assumptions used for the calculation can materially affect the
fair value estimate.
F-83
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The fair value and the assumptions used for the options granted
were as follows, for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Fair value at measurement date
|
|
|
9.86
|
|
Share price at measurement date
|
|
|
46.46
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
46.46
|
|
Expected share price volatility (%)
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
Expected option life (years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Expected dividend yield (%)
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
Risk free interest rate (%)
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
The expected volatility is based on the historic volatility
(calculated based on the weighted average remaining life of the
share options), adjusted for any expected changes to future
volatility due to publicly available information. Share options
are granted under a service condition and a non-market
performance condition. Such conditions are not taken into
account in the grant date fair value measurement. There are no
market conditions associated with the share option grants.
The grant date fair value of the performance shares is amortized
as an expense over the three-year vesting period. The fair value
at grant date is based on the Monte Carlo simulation model
taking market conditions into account. The value was calculated
by external actuaries and amounted to EUR 16.80 for the
performance shares conditionally granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
Note 12
Provisions
Provisions consist of the following at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, including current portions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement
benefits
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Restructuring of activities
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Provisions for
pensions and other postretirement benefits
The majority of the OBS Group employees participate in Akzo
Nobel defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans which
provide benefits to employees and former employees of both the
OBS Group and other Akzo Nobel businesses. In these plans, the
assets and liabilities that relate to employees (and former
employees) of the OBS Group are combined with those related to
employees (and former employees) of other Akzo Nobel businesses.
The OBS Group has obtained information about each of these Akzo
Nobel plans measured in accordance with IAS 19 on the basis of
assumptions that apply to each of the plans as a whole, and used
a reasonable allocation method to determine the OBS Groups
portion of each plans assets, liabilities and benefit
costs under IAS 19. For each of these plans, the defined
benefit obligation (at each balance sheet date), and the service
cost, contributions, benefit payments, and impact of special
events (in each accounting period), relating to the OBS Group,
have been determined using approximate
F-84
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
actuarial techniques which take into account the membership
profile of OBS Group participants compared to the membership
profile for participants in the plan as a whole. Plan assets at
each balance sheet date have generally been split in the same
proportion as the defined benefit obligation.
Management believes that such allocations have been made on a
reasonable basis, but may not necessarily be indicative of the
actual separation of these pension plans in the future.
Furthermore, some OBS Group employees participate in stand-alone
OBS Group pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The
related expenses, assets and liabilities for these plans are
accounted for in the OBS Group businesses in accordance with IAS
19.
The defined benefit pension plans in which the OBS Groups
employees participate generally provide benefits based on years
of service and employees compensation. The funding
policies for the plans are consistent with local requirements in
the countries of establishment. Obligations under the plans are
systematically provided for by depositing funds with trustees or
separate foundations, under insurance policies, or by balance
sheet provisions. Plan assets principally consist of long-term
interest-earning investments, quoted equity securities, and real
estate.
A number of OBS Groups current and former employees
participate in Akzo Nobel postretirement healthcare and life
assurance plans. The OBS Group has accrued for the expected
costs of providing such postretirement benefits during the years
that the employee rendered the necessary services.
Valuations of the obligations under the pension and other
postretirement benefit plans are carried out by independent
actuaries. The discount rates applied are based on yields
available on high quality corporate bonds that have currencies
and terms consistent with the currencies and estimated terms of
the OBS Groups obligations.
During 2006, Akzo Nobel closed their US and Canadian defined
benefit pension plans in which OBS Group employees and former
employees participate to further accrual and implemented defined
contribution plans for future benefit provision. During 2006,
Akzo Nobel also altered the qualification requirements and
changed the existing level of benefits in its US postretirement
welfare plan in which OBS Group employees and former employees
participate. Due to these changes, the OBS Groups
provision for pensions and other postretirement benefits
decreased by EUR 29 million, which was recorded in the
combined statements of income during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
During 2005, Akzo Nobel reached agreement with the unions on a
change of its pension plan in The Netherlands, so that,
effective December 31, 2005, it changed from a defined
benefit plan to a defined contribution plan. In connection with
this change during 2005, Akzo Nobel paid a one-time
nonrefundable contribution of EUR 151 million, prepaid
EUR 50 million in July 2005 of loans which are to be
repaid by retaining employee pension premiums, and granted a
EUR 100 million subordinated loan in September 2005,
that had a fair value of EUR 87 million. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, Akzo Nobel
allocated EUR 4 million and EUR 8 million of
the loans, respectively, which are to be redeemed by retaining
employee pension premiums, and EUR 33 million and
EUR 33 million, respectively, of the fair value of the
subordinated loan to the OBS Group based on the ratio of
the OBS Groups plan liabilities to the total Akzo
Nobel Pension Fund liabilities. Management feels that the
allocation method is reasonable.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the pension
and postretirement provisions are EUR 266 million and
EUR 263 million, respectively, which have been
recorded as provisions in the combined balance sheets.
F-85
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 introduced prescription drug
benefits for retirees as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors
of postretirement healthcare plans, which both began at
January 1, 2006. This reimbursement right has been
recognized as an asset under other financial non-current assets
in the combined balance sheets and is measured at fair value. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, this value was
EUR 9 million and EUR 9 million,
respectively.
The net periodic pension costs for the defined benefit pension
plans for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
EUR 15 million and EUR 21 million,
respectively.
Provisions for
restructuring of activities
Provisions for restructuring of activities comprise accruals for
certain employee benefits and for costs that are directly
associated with plans to exit specific activities and closing
down of facilities. For all restructurings a detailed formal
plan exists, and the implementation of the plan has started or
the plan has been announced. Most restructuring activities
relate to relatively smaller restructurings, and are expected to
be completed within two years from the balance sheet date.
However, for certain plans payments of termination benefits to
former employees may take several years longer.
Other
provisions
Other provisions relate to a great variety of risks and
commitments, including provisions for other long-term employee
benefits like long-service leave and jubilee payments,
provisions for environmental costs, provision for returns,
allowances and legal claims. At June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the OBS Group has recorded a provision
of EUR 11 million for returns and allowances. For
details on environmental expenses, see Note 17.
The majority of the cash outflows related to other provisions
are expected to be within 1 to 5 years. In calculating the
other provisions a discount rate average of 5% has been used.
Note 13
Deferred Income
In December 2003, the OBS Group received an initial payment of
EUR 88 million from Pfizer for the co-development and
co-marketing agreement for asenapine. Such payments are to be
reported as deferred income and to be recognized as revenue in
subsequent years. For this payment, recognition is based on the
estimated co-development costs expected to be incurred over the
co-development period. Because the agreement terminated in May
2007, all amounts have been recognized in income as of
June 30, 2007.
Note 14
Borrowings (Non-current)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Debt to credit institutions
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
The weighted average effective interest rate approximated 5.9%
for the six months ended June 30, 2007, and 5.9% in 2006.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, none of the
borrowings were secured by means of mortgages, etc.
F-86
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Note 15
Borrowings (Current)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December, 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Debt to credit institutions
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Current portion of borrowings
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Note 16
Financial Instruments
Foreign
exchange risk management
The OBS Group enters into forward exchange contracts with
Akzo Nobel and with third parties to hedge the transaction risk
on sales, purchases, and financing transactions denominated in
currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiary
concerned. The purpose of these foreign currency hedging
activities is to protect the OBS Group from the risk that
the eventual functional currency net cash flows resulting from
committed trade or financing transactions are adversely affected
by changes in exchange rates. Most forward exchange contracts
outstanding at year-end have a maturity of less than one year.
Where necessary, the forward exchange contracts are rolled over
at maturity. The OBS Group does not use financial
instruments to hedge the translation risk related to equity,
intercompany loans of a permanent nature, and earnings of
foreign subsidiaries. Currency derivatives are not used for
speculative purposes.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the notional
value of outstanding contracts to buy currencies totalled
EUR 41 million and EUR 21 million,
respectively, while contracts to sell currencies totalled
EUR 361 million and EUR 57 million,
respectively. These contracts mainly relate to the
U.S. dollar, Australian dollar, Swiss franc, Swedish
kronor, Norwegian kronor, Polish zloty, pounds sterling, and
Japanese yen, all having maturities within one year.
Interest risk
management
The subordinated loan to the Akzo Nobel Pension Fund is
sensitive to changes in interest rates. The
OBS Groups share of the face value of the loan is
EUR 36 million and the expected maturity is subsequent
to 2010 with an average interest rate of 3.5%. The
OBS Groups share of the carrying value of the loan
and estimated fair value is EUR 33 million with an
effective interest rate of 5.1%.
Credit
risk
The OBS Group has a credit risk management policy in place.
The exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis.
Credit evaluations are performed on all customers requiring
credit. Generally the OBS Group does not require collateral
in respect of financial assets.
Investments in cash and cash equivalents are entered into with
counterparties which have a high credit rating and limits per
counterparty have been set. Transactions involving derivative
financial instruments are with counterparties with sound credit
ratings and with whom the OBS Group has contractual netting
agreements. The OBS Group has no reason to expect
non-performance by the counterparties to these agreements.
Due to the geographical spread of the OBS Group and the
diversity of its customers, at the balance sheet date the
OBS Group was not subject to any significant concentration
of credit risks. The maximum exposure to credit risk is
represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset,
including derivative financial instruments, in the combined
balance sheet.
F-87
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Sensitivity
analysis
By managing currency risks, the OBS Group aims to reduce
the impact of short-term fluctuations on the
OBS Groups earnings. Over the longer-term, however,
permanent changes in foreign exchange and interest rates would
have an impact on combined earnings.
At June 30, 2007 the decrease in the OBS Groups
profit before tax as a result of a general increase of one
percentage point in interest rates would not be significant.
Cash and cash equivalent and short-term borrowings have been
included in this assessment.
Fair value of
financial instruments
The estimated fair values at June 30, 2007 of non-current
borrowings and the subordinated loan to the Akzo Nobel Pension
fund approximate their carrying values. The fair value of the
OBS Groups non-current borrowings was estimated based
on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on
the current rates offered to the OBS Group for debt with
similar maturities.
The fair value of forward exchange contracts is determined using
quoted forward exchange rates at the balance sheet date.
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 the OBS
Groups forward exchange contracts were recognized at fair
value.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
current borrowings, and other current liabilities approximate
fair value due to the short maturity period of those instruments.
Note 17
Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
Environmental
matters
The OBS Group is confronted with costs arising out of
environmental laws and regulations, which include obligations to
eliminate or limit the effects on the environment of the
disposal or release of certain wastes or substances at various
sites. Proceedings involving environmental matters, such as the
alleged discharge of chemicals or waste materials into the air,
water, or soil, are pending against the OBS Group in
various countries.
It is the OBS Groups policy to accrue and charge
against earnings environmental cleanup costs when it is probable
that a liability has incurred and an amount is reasonably
estimable. These accruals are reviewed periodically and
adjusted, if necessary, as assessments and cleanups proceed and
additional information becomes available. Environmental
liabilities can change substantially due to the emergence of
additional information on the nature or extent of the
contamination, the necessity of employing particular methods of
remediation, actions by governmental agencies or private
parties, or other factors of a similar nature. Cash expenditures
often lag behind the period in which an accrual is recorded by a
number of years.
The provisions for environmental costs accounted for in
accordance with the aforesaid policies aggregated
EUR 1.0 million and nil as of June 30, 2007 and
as of December 31, 2006, respectively. The provision has
been discounted using an average discount rate of 5.25%.
The OBS Group has certain asset retirement obligations for which
the timing of settlement is conditional upon the closure of the
related operating facility. At this time, there are no specific
plans for the closure of these related facilities, and the OBS
Group currently intends to make improvements to the assets as
necessary that would extend their lives indefinitely.
Furthermore, the settlement dates
F-88
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
have not been specified by law, regulation or contract. As a
result, the OBS Group is unable to estimate the fair value of
the liability. If a closure plan for any of these facilities is
initiated in the future, the settlement dates will become
determinable, an estimate of the fair value will be made, and an
asset retirement obligation will be recorded.
While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of all pending
environmental exposures, it is reasonably possible that there
will be a need for future provisions for environmental costs
which, in managements opinion, based on information
currently available, would not have a material effect on the
OBS Groups financial position and liquidity but could
be material to the OBS Groups results of operations
in any one accounting period.
Antitrust
In 1999, the Brazilian Consumer Authority commenced action
against Hoechst Roussel Vet, a veterinary company acquired by
Intervet in 1999. The Brazilian Consumer Authority demanded the
OBS Group to justify the prices charged for FMD vaccines,
asserting that such prices were abusive. On February 1,
2001, the Secretariat for Economic Monitoring issued a technical
opinion recommending the dismissal of the proceeding, because
there was no proof of the alleged conduct. An economic survey
justifying the pricing and documentation was provided by
Intervet to the Ministry of Justice in May 2005. However, no
final report and opinion has been published at this time. The
maximum fine the Brazilian Consumer Authority could impose on
Intervet is 30% of the total gross revenue of the Brazilian
subsidiary in the year before the alleged infraction, which
would amount to less than EUR 10 million.
Also in 1999, the Brazilian Antitrust Authority commenced an
investigation into Organons Brazilian subsidiary and 20
other pharmaceutical companies to investigate alleged collusion
on their part against generic manufacturers of pharmaceutical
products in Brazil. A final administrative decision was issued
in October 2005, and each pharmaceutical company, including our
subsidiary, was convicted and fined an amount equal to 1% of
total gross revenue (free from tax) in the year before the
infraction. This amount has not yet been established, the
OBS Group have made a provision in the amount of
approximately EUR 0.8 million.
Litigation
During 2005, the State of Alabama, the State of Mississippi, and
41 counties (now 42 counties) and New York City within the State
of New York, separately brought claims against up to
approximately 80 pharmaceutical manufacturers, including Organon
Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., the predecessor of our United States
subsidiary Organon Pharmaceuticals U.S.A Inc. LLC and Organon
USA, Inc., alleging pricing fraud and, in the case of the State
of Mississippi, conspiracy to commit such fraud, in violation of
state, federal,
and/or
common law. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants committed
fraud and were unjustly enriched by intentionally setting false
and inflated average wholesale prices for their pharmaceutical
products, which is the basis for Medicaid reimbursement. The
plaintiffs further allege that such products were then marketed
to pharmacists, physicians
and/or
pharmacy chain stores in such a way as to capitalize on the
difference between the amount reimbursed by Medicaid for
dispensing the products and the actual acquisition cost for the
products. The allegations against our subsidiary have been pled
with limited specificity and, although
Remeron®
sales are specifically mentioned in most complaints, in all
cases except in Alabama, the allegations may extend to other
products also. The complaints seek injunctive relief as well as
actual, statutory, treble and punitive damages and, in some
cases, disgorgements.
F-89
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
All but four of the New York county cases have been consolidated
in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts. Three of the remaining New York cases have been
removed to federal district courts in New York and transfer to
the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation. A motion to dismiss the cases in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts was
partially granted in April 2007. Thereafter, plaintiffs have
filed a First Amended Consolidated Complaint, in response to
which defendants, including our subsidiaries, have filed a joint
motion to dismiss. A decision on this motion is expected in the
second half of 2007. A motion to dismiss the Erie County case
(one of the cases pending transfer to the U.S. District
Court for the District of Massachusetts) was partially granted
in September 2006. The Mississippi case has been dismissed. The
proceedings in the State of Alabama are at an early stage, with
discovery having commenced on April 13, 2005. The
OBS Group does not believe to have been engaged in any
improper conduct and are vigorously defending these matters.
Certain wholly owned operating subsidiaries of Organon and
Intervet were named in the final report of the Independent
Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil for Food
Program for humanitarian support to Iraq. The report states that
these entities made some improper payments in connection with
four contracts (with a total value of USD 3.4 million)
with the Iraqi Government to provide pharmaceuticals and
vaccines. Akzo Nobel has been conducting an internal review of
this matter and has voluntarily reported on that review to the
US Securities and Exchange Commission and to the US Department
of Justice. The Dutch FIOD/ECD also conducted an investigation
into Organons involvement in this matter; these
investigations have been concluded in May 2007. The
OBS Group is currently discussing a possible settlement
with these authorities. While neither of the said authorities
have taken any action against Akzo Nobel or its subsidiaries,
this matter could expose Akzo Nobel
and/or its
subsidiaries to regulatory
and/or
criminal charges and sanctions.
In January 2006, Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. and the Akzo Nobel
Pension Fund in The Netherlands received a summons from the
Association of Retired Akzo Nobel Employees (Vereniging van
Gepensioneerden Akzo Nobel) with regard to the changed financing
of Akzo Nobels Dutch pension plan (relating to the change
from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan), as
a consequence of which an alleged unconditional right to
indexation became conditional. If the claim were to succeed,
then, pursuant to the separation agreement, the OBS Group
would be responsible to reimburse Akzo Nobel or any other member
of its group for all losses actually incurred in connection
therewith to the extent relating to any former employees that,
at the time of ceasing their employment with the Akzo Nobel
Group, worked primarily in any current or former human
healthcare or animal healthcare activities of the Akzo Nobel
Group. The claim was recently dismissed by the Court of First
Instance. An appeal can be filed within three months after the
courts judgment, which period expires in April 2007.
In July 2006, drug wholesaler RxUSA brought claims against 16
pharmaceutical manufacturers, including the OBS Group, as
well as against five drug wholesalers, the Healthcare Management
Distribution Association and certain individuals, alleging joint
and several liability for, amongst other things, monopolization
of the wholesale pharmaceutical market in violation of state and
federal antitrust laws. The plaintiff claims that defendants
willfully acquired and sought to maintain a monopoly and exclude
competition by secondary wholesalers. The plaintiff
further alleges that the 16 pharmaceutical manufacturers and
other wholesale dealers wrongfully and illegally refused to deal
directly with RxUSA, making it impossible for it to acquire
products for sale. RxUSA is seeking injunctive relief,
attorneys fees and treble damages. The proceedings are at
an early stage. The OBS Group has filed motions to dismiss
these claims and intend to contest them vigorously.
F-90
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
During 2006 the OBS Group lost key elements of patent
protection for
Livial®
in the United Kingdom. Key protective claims under our chemical
purity, crystalline purity and particle size patents have
recently been revoked by U.K. courts. The OBS Group has
decided to appeal the revocation of the crystalline purity
patent, but not to appeal the decision regarding the chemical
purity patent. Permission to appeal the decision regarding the
particle size patent has been denied by the Court in London. The
OBS Groups chemical purity patent has been revoked by
the European Patent Office; The OBS Group has appealed the
decision to revoke this patent, and this appeal has had a
suspensive effect on revocation. The OBS Groups
particle size patent has also been challenged before the
European Patent Office.
A number of the OBS Group subsidiaries are the subject of
litigation or product liability claims arising out of the normal
conduct of their business, as a result of which claims could be
made against them which, in whole or in part, might not be
covered by insurance. Provisions are established for the gross
amount of any probable claim that can be reasonably estimated.
Insurance receivables are recorded only in respect of amounts
that are virtually certain to be recovered.
There are various remaining product liability claims pending
against the OBS Group in various European countries,
Brazil, Mexico and Australia by, in most cases, women claiming
to have conceived while allegedly using the
OBS Groups contraceptive
Implanon®.
Other claims relate to problems in connection with the insertion
or removal of
Implanon®
or to changes in bleeding patterns. Often, the physician who
inserted the product is named as a co-defendant. Although these
cases have all been brought by individual women, only in The
Netherlands the competent court has decided to consolidate the
cases. On June 15, 2005, a court in
s-Hertogenbosch
in The Netherlands issued a preliminary judgment to the effect
that, pending allocation of responsibility between physicians
and Organon, damages should be paid to women who unintentionally
became pregnant while using
Implanon®.
The OBS Group appealed this decision in September 2005.
Oral pleadings were presented for the court of appeal on
May 14, 2007. A judgment is expected on August 28,
2007. No final judgments have been rendered. Any damages for
which the OBS Group may be held liable in connection with
these cases are expected to be covered by product liability
insurance.
In 1999 an ex-freelance collaborator of Diosynth B.V./Moeders
voor Moeders, commenced legal action with respect to alleged
entitlements to retirement benefits against Diosynth B.V. (as
per January 1, 2007, part of N.V. Organon). Entitlement to
a retirement benefit requires all employment relationship;
Diosynth believes that freelancers working for Moeders voor
Moeders do not qualify as employees and are not entitled to
receive a pension. The legal position in this case may create a
precedent for a couple of hundred of ex-freelancers of Moeders
voor Moeders. The deposition of witnesses in this case will be
finalized on October 4, 2007.
Salmon producers in Chile have made claims for damages allegedly
incurred because of the use of Intervets fish vaccines in
that country. The claims were filed in 2005, 2006 and 2007. The
claims maintain that administration of Intervets vaccine
against vibriosis and infectious pancreatic necrosis caused
death or injury to part of their salmon populations. No
judgments have been rendered. At this time the OBS Group
has no reason to believe that any damages for which the
OBS Group may be held liable in connection with these
claims would not be covered by the product liability insurance
the OBS Group maintains.
A case from Intervet, Inc. against Merial Ltd. et al., is
pending since December 23, 2005 in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia. This lawsuit is a
declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration from the court
that United States Patent No. 6,368,601 (titled
Porcine
F-91
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Circovirus Vaccine and Diagnostics Reagents and referred
to herein as the 601 patent) is invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed by Intervets
PCV-2
vaccine.
Merial Ltd, and Merial SAS have answered the Complaint by
alleging that the 601 patent is valid, enforceable, and
infringed by Intervets
PCV-2
vaccine. They also have brought a counterclaim for patent
infringement against Intervet, Inc. Intervet has responded by
asserting that the 601 patent is invalid,unenforceable,
and not infringed by Intervet, Inc. Discovery is presently
ongoing between Merial SAS, Merial Ltd, and Intervet Inc. Under
the present schedule for the case, there will be a hearing to
determine the meaning of the claims of the 601 patent
early August, 2007. Trial of this matter likely will not occur
until the second or third quarter of 2008.
A second case, Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd. et al., is pending
since March 20, 2007, in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia. This lawsuit is a declaratory
judgment action seeking a declaration from the court that United
States Patent No. 7,192,594 (titled Postweaning
Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome and Porcine Circovirus from
Pigs and referred to herein as the 594
patent) is invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed by
Intervets
PCV-2
vaccine. Merial Ltd, and Merial SAS have filed and served a
Complaint for patent infringement and demand for jury trial,
alleging that the 594 patent is valid, enforceable, and
infringed by Intervets
PCV-2
vaccine.
In November 2006, four trade unions together initiated
proceedings in The Netherlands against Akzo Nobel Nederland
B.V., a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel. The trade unions claim that
Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V., allegedly as representative of
all other parts of the Akzo Nobel Group, wrongfully
terminated the future payment of an allowance to cover medical
insurance costs of retirees in The Netherlands. These retirees
also include persons who were employed in current or former
human healthcare and animal healthcare activities of Akzo Nobel.
The trade unions allege that the retirees, on the basis of a
promise made by Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V., were entitled to
receive the allowance indefinitely and that there was
insufficient cause for termination of the obligation. Akzo Nobel
Nederland B.V. has indicated that it had the right to terminate
the arrangements subject to a transitional regime through
June 30, 2009. Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. has expressed the
intention to defend the claim by the trade unions. The
proceedings against Akzo Nobel Nederland B.V. are at an early
stage. It is currently not clear what would be the financial
consequences for the OBS Group if the claim would succeed.
Pursuant to the separation agreement, the OBS Group will be
responsible for all costs incurred by Akzo Nobel or any other
member of its group in connection with the allowances mentioned
above with respect to retirees that, at the time of ceasing
their employment with Akzo Nobel, worked primarily in any
current or former human healthcare or animal healthcare
activities of Akzo Nobel. The maximum amount that the
OBS Group could be required to reimburse would depend on a
number of factors, which also include the arrangements with
individual employees, any future changes in the arrangements,
and the age to which the retirees will live.
On March 23, 2007 the University of Illinois filed a
lawsuit against Organon Teknika Corporation for breach of
contract the revised Tice license agreement which
dates back to 1986. The UOI claims USD 14.9 million of
underpaid royalties (which is UOIs calculation of the
present value of the alleged royalty underpayment), based on an
audit on the period January 1, 2002, through
December 31, 2004. The difference relates to a different
interpretation of what the correct arms length price
should be. Organon Teknika is of the opinion that it paid the
correct amount of royalties.
There have been various lawsuits filed against several US
entities relating to the use of NuvaRing. With the exception of
three cases, the lawsuits contain little information about the
claimed
F-92
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
injuries. It should be noted that the OBS Group does not yet
have medical or other records to corroborate the allegations.
The remaining cases do not contain any information other than
the allegation that the women used NuvaRing and sustained
injuries thereby. Other general allegations of the
thrombogenicity of the product suggest that the claimants intend
to allege that they sustained a thromboembolic event.
A number of other claims are pending against the OBS Group,
all of which are contested. The OBS Group is also involved
in disputes with tax authorities in several jurisdictions.
Furthermore, in the context of the divestitures of certain
businesses by Akzo Nobel, our sole shareholder, prior to the
creation of OBS NV, the relevant Akzo Nobel companies have
agreed to indemnify
and/or
provide guarantees to the buyers (and /or their successors and
assigns) regarding certain representations and warranties or
developments. To the extent that these relate to the current or
former human pharmaceutical or animal health business activities
of Akzo Nobel, the OBS Group agreed under the Separation
Agreement to indemnify Akzo Nobel in respect of claims arising
therefrom.
While the outcome of these claims and disputes cannot be
predicted with certainty, the OBS Group believes, based
upon legal advice and information received, that the final
outcome will not materially affect the combined financial
position of the OBS Group but could be material to the
OBS Groups result of operations or cash flows in any
one accounting period.
Other
contingent liabilities
At June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, guarantees
related to contracts with third parties totalled
EUR 5 million and EUR 3 million,
respectively.
A majority of the OBS Group businesses do not file separate
tax returns since these entities were included in the tax
groupings of other Akzo Nobel entities within their respective
entitys tax jurisdiction. Certain tax authorities have the
right to hold an individual entity within the tax grouping
liable for any and all liabilities outstanding of the group.
Management of the OBS Group believes that the chances are
remote that the OBS Group will be held responsible for tax
liabilities incurred by other Akzo Nobel entities.
The OBS Group is a party in several research and
development collaborations and licensing agreements. These
agreements have various compensation elements that can contain
periodic payments, payments related to sales of certain products
and milestone payments. The periodic payments are expensed in
the period they relate to and the payments related to sales of
certain products are expensed in the period the corresponding
sales were recognized. Milestone payments are expensed in the
period in which the recognition criteria related to the
milestone are met.
Some of the licenses and collaboration, co-development,
co-marketing and other agreements and instruments to which the
OBS Group is a party, contain change of control provisions
that may be triggered by a change in the controlling interest in
our business. See Note 20 for further discussion of potential
impacts related to the Separation of the OBS group.
Pfizer terminated the asenapine license and collaboration
agreement on November 27, 2006. The termination took effect
on May 27, 2007. If and when the OBS Group is successful in
bringing asenapine to the market, the OBS Group will be obliged
to reimburse Pfizer for its out-of-pocket expenses (plus 10%
interest) for development, marketing and manufacturing, by
paying it a royalty at the rate of 5% on net asenapine sales.
F-93
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Commitments
Purchase commitments for property, plant and equipment
aggregated EUR 63 million and EUR 69 million
at June 30, 2007 and December 31 2006, respectively. The
OBS Group also has purchase commitments for materials and
other supplies incident to the ordinary conduct of business for
a total of EUR 355 million and
EUR 358 million at June 30, 2007 and December 31
2006, respectively.
Long-term liabilities contracted in respect of leasehold,
rental, operating leases, research, etc., aggregated
EUR 241 million and EUR 287 million at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Payments due within one year amounted to
EUR 66 million and EUR 93 million at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively;
payments between one and five years EUR 152 million
and EUR 158 million, respectively, and payments due
after more than five years amount to EUR 23 million
and EUR 36 million, respectively.
Note 18
Cash Flow Information
The OBS Group has paid cash for income taxes of
EUR 57 million and EUR 67 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For
periods prior to 2007, some entities of the OBS Group businesses
did not file separate tax returns as these entities were
included in the tax grouping of other Akzo Nobel entities within
the respective entitys tax jurisdiction, and
OBS Groups tax obligations for these entities are
paid by other Akzo Nobel entities.
The OBS Group paid cash for interest of
EUR 10 million and EUR 4 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The OBS Groups financing requirements are primarily
met by cash transfers with Akzo Nobel and are reflected in the
financing section of the combined statement of cash flows. This
represents net cash transfers to and from Akzo Nobel for the
settlement of various intercompany transactions and financing
requirements with Akzo Nobel.
Note 19
Accounting Estimates and Judgments
In preparing the financial statements management makes judgments
and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent liabilities as of the date of the OBS Groups
combined financial statements.
The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an
ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized
in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision
affects only that period or in the period of the revision and
future periods if the revision affects both current and future
periods.
In preparing these combined interim financial statements, the
significant judgements made by management in applying the
accounting policies and the key sources of estimation
uncertainty were the same as those applied to the combined
financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. It should be noted that as of
June 30, 2007, the OBS Group did not update its
actuarial valuation for its pension and postretirement benefits;
however, during the six months ended June 30, 2007, the
discount rate assumption used in determining benefit costs
increased in the various countries by between .25% and .50%.
When discount rates increase, pension and postretirement benefit
obligations will decrease. Based on the increase during the six
months ended June 30, 2006, the pension and postretirement
benefit obligations would have decreased by approximately
EUR 50 million. Future net periodic pension and
postretirement costs might also
F-94
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
change, but that depends on the actual relation between the
unrecognized loss and the corridor (10% of the greater of
benefit obligations and plan assets) as well as on the relative
change of the discount rate versus the change of the benefit
obligation. In addition, the change in discount rate will not
immediately impact the pension expense as the gains or losses
from the change in the discount rate would be reflected as an
actuarial gain or loss and recognized over the expected average
remaining working lives of the employees in the plan.
Current tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 has been calculated using the estimated average annual
effective income tax applied to the pre-tax income for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Due to the risks and uncertainties relating to regulatory
approval and to internally generated research and development,
the criteria for capitalization are considered not to have been
met until marketing approval has been obtained from the
regulatory authorities.
Prior to January 1, 2007, management had also estimated the
allocation of various expenses and certain assets and
liabilities that have historically been maintained by Akzo Nobel
as disclosed in Note 1 and throughout these combined
interim financial statements.
Note 20
Incorporation and Separation
Incorporation
Following the announcement of Akzo Nobel that it intends to
separate its healthcare activities from Akzo Nobel, Akzo Nobel
incorporated Organon BioSciences N.V., on September 1, 2006
as a public company with limited liability (naamloze
vennootschap) incorporated under the laws of The
Netherlands with an authorized share capital of EUR 225
thousand and an issued share capital of EUR 45 thousand.
OBS N.V.s corporate seat is in Oss, The Netherlands.
On September 30, 2006 Akzo Nobel contributed to
OBS N.V., through a contribution in kind, the shares of the
two subholding companies, Organon BioSciences International B.V.
and Organon BioSciences Nederland B.V., in exchange for
24,955,000 ordinary shares of OBS N.V. with a nominal value
of EUR 1.00 (one euro) per share. As per the date of this
contribution, OBS N.V. had an authorized share capital of
EUR 125 million and an issued share capital of
EUR 25 million.
The combined interim financial statements for the six month
period ended June 30, 2007, include invested equity
amounting to EUR 1,423 million. The invested equity as
of June 30, 2007 includes certain allocated balances, which
legally were not part of the aforesaid contribution in kind to
OBS. N.V. on September 30, 2006. Consequently, the
shareholders equity in the legal company balance sheet of
OBS N.V. as of June 30, 2007 differs from the invested
equity in the combined interim financial statements as of
June 30, 2007. The main differences relate to various items
which are allocated to the OBS Group which will not be
transferred to the OBS Group.
Separation
In February 2006, Akzo Nobel announced its intention to separate
the OBS Group. In March 2007, Akzo Nobel announced that it
had subsequently received an offer from
Schering-Plough
to acquire the OBS Group. The works council advice
procedure in the Netherlands is still to be completed. Subject
thereto, the intended closing is further subject to certain
conditions precedent, including the obtaining of merger
clearances in certain jurisdictions. The proceeds from the sale
of the OBS Group will not be received by the OBS Group
but will be received by Akzo Nobel.
F-95
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group have identified certain issues
and areas that, in preparation of and following the separation,
required mutually agreeable arrangements between them. These
issues and areas have been included in a separation agreement,
entered into between Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group. The
separation agreement was signed on February 28, 2007 and
was subsequently amended on March 11, 2007.
The amended separation agreement (which becomes effective on the
intended closing of the transaction with
Schering-Plough)
addresses, amongst others, the separation of liabilities and
obligations, health, safety, and environmental indemnities,
release of guarantees, pending litigation, provisions and
accruals, claimants insurance and employee benefit related
matters.
The terms of the intended transaction between Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough,
include that, subject to certain limitations and procedural
provisions, Akzo Nobel indemnifies
Schering-Plough
for i) all taxes for which a member of the OBS Group
becomes liable, relating to the period prior to January 1,
2007 and that are not provided for in the combined financial
statements of the OBS Group for the period ended as of
December 31, 2006 and (ii) taxes for which a member of
the OBS Group becomes liable relating to the period
starting on January 1, 2007 and ending on the closing date
of the intended transaction, unless and to the extent the member
of the OBS Group concerned retains the benefit of the
underlying income, profit or gain at closing, or such income,
profit, gain or event has arisen in the ordinary course of
business of the member of the OBS Group concerned.
The terms of the intended transaction further include that
Schering-Plough
will indemnify Akzo Nobel against any increase of taxes incurred
by Akzo Nobel or a member of Akzo Nobel as a consequence of any
pre-closing transactions, requested by
Schering-Plough
and consented by Akzo Nobel, which would allow for a direct sale
by Akzo Nobel of the shares in one or more members of the
OBS Group to
Schering-Plough.
The separation agreement also contains provisions dealing with
the retirement benefits of relevant participants in various
applicable pension arrangements based on an agreed upon division
of the rights, obligations, assets and liabilities relating to,
on the one hand, the retirement benefits of the relevant
(current and former) employees in the (current and former) human
healthcare or animal healthcare activities of the OBS Group and,
on the other hand, retirement benefits of other participants in
Akzo Nobel plans. It should be noted that a number of these
provisions are dependent on the approval of relevant third
parties, for example pension fund trustees, employee
representative bodies and relevant authorities. The separation
agreement thus also provides that in the event that the
OBS Group and Akzo Nobel have not been able to give effect
to the agreed (basis for) division, they will use their
reasonable best efforts to otherwise achieve such division.
OBS N.V. has undertaken in the separation agreement to
procure that, for services rendered on or after January 1,
2007, relevant participants under the OBS Group retirement
benefit plans are offered retirement benefits which are
substantially equivalent (or such other measure as may be
required under applicable law) to their current retirement
benefits.
The financial implications of a future split as defined above,
for example on assets, liabilities and future pension premiums,
if any, cannot be determined yet. However, it is the intention
of Akzo Nobel and the OBS Group to limit the financial
implications for the companies, arising out of the split of
rights, obligations and assets. Furthermore, the subordinated
loan to the Akzo Nobel Pension Fund of which the
OBS Groups portion (EUR 33 million) was
allocated in the combined financial statements for the year
ending December 31, 2006, will remain with Akzo Nobel since
Akzo Nobel holds the legal title.
F-96
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The terms of the intended transaction between, Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough
further include that (i) Akzo Nobel will transfer to the
purchaser, at closing of the intended transaction, its claim
against the OBS Group under the related party loan of
EUR 1.15 billion plus accrued interest and
(ii) all other intra-group indebtedness between the
OBS Group on the one hand and the other members of the Akzo
Nobel Group on the other hand (including several loans made by
the OBS Group to Akzo Nobel in 2007 on terms substantially
equivalent to the aforesaid related party loan), will be paid
immediately after closing. Under the loan agreement between Akzo
Nobel (as lender) and the OBS Group (as borrower) the
maturity date of the loan is December 31, 2007 and an
interest rate of
6-months
EURIBOR + 0.15%, that accrues on the amount owed, from
March 1, 2007 to the date of payment (both days inclusive).
The entire principal amount of the loan not yet repaid to Akzo
Nobel shall be due for immediate payment without any further
notification or formality being required should, amongst others,
any other indebtedness of the OBS Group becomes due and
payable prior to its specified maturity by reason of any default
by the OBS Group in the due performance or observance of
any obligation relating thereto, unless such indebtedness shall
not be material in the context of the loan agreement.
The OBS Group has undertaken to replace the statement of
joint and several liability (verklaring van hoofdelijke
aansprakelijkheid) as provided by Akzo Nobel in respect of
the members of the OBS Group in The Netherlands under
article 2:403 section 1(f) Netherlands Civil Code as
soon as reasonably practicable, but in any event within
6 months after closing of the intended transaction between
Akzo Nobel and
Schering-Plough.
Note 21
Application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the
United States of America
The OBS Groups combined interim financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with IFRS which, as applied by
the OBS Group, differs in certain significant respects from
US GAAP. The effects of the application of US GAAP to combined
net income, as determined under IFRS, are set out in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
IFRS profit for the period
attributable to equity holders of the OBS Group
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Pensions and other
postretirement benefits
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(c) Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Research and development
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
(e) Subsequent events
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
(f) Tax on elimination of
intercompany profits
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
(g) Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported under US
GAAP
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The effects of the application of US GAAP on total invested
equity, as determined under IFRS, are set out in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Invested equity, as reported under
IFRS
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
Less: minority interests, as
reported under IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested equity excluding minority
interests, as reported under IFRS
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Business combinations
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
(b) Pensions and other
postretirement benefits
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
(c) Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
(d) Research and development
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
(e) Subsequent events
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
(f) Tax on elimination of
intercompany profits
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
(g) Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested equity, as determined
under US GAAP
|
|
|
1,769
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Business
combinations
|
The aggregate adjustment for business combinations presented in
the tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Acquired in-process research
and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(2) Application of IFRS 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Acquired
in-process research and development
Under IFRS, in-process research and development acquired in
connection with a business combination is eligible for
capitalization under IFRS 3, Business Combinations, and
IAS 38, Intangible Assets. Under US GAAP, the
attributable fair value of in-process research and development
acquired in a business combination, and which has no alternative
future use, is expensed as of the acquisition date in accordance
with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations,
FIN No. 4, Applicability of FASB Statement
No. 2 to Business Combinations to be Accounted for by the
Purchase Method,
and/or
SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development
Costs.
F-98
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
The adjustment to invested equity included in the tables above
reflects impact of immediate write-off of acquired in-process
research and development-related assets (EUR 5 million
and EUR 5 million as of the six months ended June 30,
2007 and as of the year ended December 31, 2006,
respectively) for US GAAP purposes. There was no impact for the
reversal of amortization expense
and/or
impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 recorded under IFRS in subsequent periods.
(2) Application
of IFRS 1
IFRS 1, First-Time Adoption of International Financial
Reporting Standards, has been applied by the OBS Group in
preparing its combined financial statements. IFRS 1 generally
requires retrospective application of all IFRS that are
effective at the reporting date. However, IFRS 1 permits certain
exemptions and exceptions to this requirement. In particular,
IFRS 1 permits companies that consummated business combinations
prior to the date of their transition to IFRS (for the OBS
Group, as of January 1, 2004) to retain the accounting
applied under the accounting principles applied prior to the
adoption of IFRS.
Specifically, for certain business combinations consummated
prior to January 1, 2000, the OBS Group recorded goodwill
resulting from the business combinations directly in invested
equity. From January 1, 2000 through the adoption of
changes in accounting rules applied prior to the adoption of
IFRS, the OBS Group amortized goodwill. Under US GAAP, for
all periods presented, goodwill is required to be recorded as an
asset, initially subject to periodic amortization (through
December 31, 2001) and subsequently periodic (at least
annual) impairment tests.
Accordingly, this adjustment reflects the reinstatement of
goodwill, net of applicable accumulated amortization and
impairments, for US GAAP purposes as of each of the balance
sheet dates presented.
|
|
(b)
|
Pensions and
other postretirement benefits
|
The aggregate adjustment for pensions and postretirement
benefits presented in the tables above consists of the following
adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Definition of defined
contribution plan
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
(2) Application of IFRS 1 and
other differences
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Definition of
defined contribution plan
|
Under IAS 19 (Revised), Employee Benefits, an arrangement
qualifies as a defined contribution plan if a companys
legal or constructive obligation is limited to the amount
contributed by it into a separate entity (generally, a fund).
This is the case regardless of whether the fund holds sufficient
F-99
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
assets to pay all employee benefits laid out in the plan
agreement relating to employee service in the current and prior
periods. This definition focuses on the contributions to be made
by the OBS Group to the plan as a whole and does not require
individual participant accounts to which contributions would be
made.
Under US GAAP, SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, states that a defined contribution
plan is any arrangement that provides benefits in return for
services rendered, establishes an individual account for each
participant, and specifies how recurring periodic contributions
to the individuals account are to be determined. Moreover,
the benefits a participant in a defined contribution plan will
receive depend solely on the amount contributed to the
participants account, the return earned on those
contributions, and forfeitures of other participants
benefits that may be allocated to the remaining participant
accounts.
During 2005, Akzo Nobel reached an agreement with the unions on
a change of its pension plan in the Netherlands, part of which
relates to the OBS Group, so that effective
December 31, 2005, it changed from a defined benefit plan
to a defined contribution plan under IFRS, as the actuarial
risks related to the Dutch plan no longer rested with the
OBS Group. However, under US GAAP, SFAS No. 87
specifically prescribes for a defined contribution plan that the
plan provides an individual account for each participant.
The Dutch plan does not provide such individual accounts per
participant as it is a collective defined contribution plan.
Accordingly for US GAAP, under SFAS No. 87 the Dutch
pension plan is still accounted for as a defined benefit plan.
The adjustment to invested equity included in the table above as
of the six months ended June 30, 2007 and as of the year
ended December 31, 2006 reflects the re-instatement of the
US GAAP liability for the pension and other postretirement
plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87. The adjustment to net
income included in the tables above for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 reflects the excess of US GAAP
expense calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 87 over
contributions made to the plan during the year.
|
|
(2)
|
Application of
IFRS 1 and other difference
|
Under IFRS, the OBS Group accounts for its pension and
postretirement benefit plans in accordance with IAS 19
(Revised), Employee Benefits. In addition, upon
transition to IFRS as of January 1, 2004 (and in accordance
with IFRS 1, all unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as
of that date were recognized immediately in invested equity,
with an offset to the pension liability. Accordingly, under
IFRS, as of January 1, 2004, the OBS Group had no
deferred actuarial gains or losses. Subsequently, in accordance
with IAS 19 (Revised), the OBS Group applied a
corridor policy whereby actuarial gains and losses
are deferred when they initially arise (for those arising after
January 1, 2004). Thereafter, to the extent that unrealized
actuarial gains or losses exceed 10% of the greater of
(i) the present value of the defined benefit obligation and
(ii) the fair value of plan assets, they are recognized in
the income statement through periodic amortization over the
expected remaining working lives of the employees participating
in the plan. Otherwise, they continue to be deferred until they
exceed the corridor described above.
Under US GAAP, the OBS Group accounts for its pension and
postretirement benefit plans in accordance with
SFAS No. 87, SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
than Pensions and, from December 31, 2006,
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R). Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 158, the OBS Group applied a
corridor policy also under US GAAP. Following
adoption of SFAS No. 158 from December 31, 2006,
F-100
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
the OBS Group continues to apply a corridor policy with
respect to determination of the income statement charge for any
particular period, but the full funded status of the plan
(defined benefit obligation less plan assets) is now recognized
as a liability in the balance sheet with actuarial gains and
losses recognized directly in invested equity.
In addition to the differences described above (principally
related to the recognition of deferred actuarial gains and
losses directly in invested equity as of January 1, 2004
pursuant to IFRS 1), the OBS Group has also identified
differences related to the measurement date for certain of its
plans. Under IFRS, IAS 19 requires that the calculation of the
pension obligation, as well as the fair value of plan assets, be
determined as of the companys balance sheet date. Under US
GAAP, SFAS No. 87, requires that the plans
assets and obligations be measured either as of the date of the
financial statements or, if used consistently from year to year,
as of a date not more than three months prior to that date.
Certain of the OBS Groups defined benefit plans
utilize a September 30 measurement date for US GAAP purposes and
a December 31 measurement date for IFRS purposes.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement
and Modernization Act of 2003 introduced prescription drug
benefits for retirees as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors
of postretirement healthcare plans, which both began on
January 1, 2006. This reimbursement right under IFRS has
been recognized as an asset under other financial non-current
assets in the combined balance sheets and is measured at fair
value. Under US GAAP, this reimbursement right is netted with
the postretirement healthcare benefit liability.
In connection with the change in the pension plan in the
Netherlands in 2005, the OBS Group was allocated a portion
of the subordinated loan and loans that are to be redeemed by
retaining employee pension premiums, which have been recorded at
their fair value in other assets under IFRS. For US GAAP
purposes, these items are included in the pension assets at
their nominal value, and accordingly the assets in the IFRS
balance sheet have been reversed. Any difference between the
fair value and the nominal value of the loans has been reversed
for US GAAP.
|
|
(c)
|
Impairment of
goodwill
|
Under IFRS, goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at
least annually (and, more frequently, upon the occurrence of a
triggering event) at the cash generating unit (or group of cash
generating units, if that is how goodwill is monitored
internally) level. A cash generating unit is the smallest
identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows from
continuing use and that are largely independent of the cash
inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The goodwill
impairment test is a one-step test that compares the recoverable
amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell or value in
use) of the cash generating unit to its carrying amount, with
any excess of carrying amount over recoverable amount recognized
as an impairment loss. Impairment losses are allocated first to
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the
cash-generating unit (or group of units) and then to the other
assets of the unit (or group of units) pro rata on the basis of
the carrying amount of each asset in the unit (or group of
units). Impairment losses related to goodwill cannot be reversed.
Under US GAAP, goodwill is required to be tested for impairment
at least annually (and, more frequently, upon the occurrence of
a triggering event) at the reporting unit level. A reporting
unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating
segment (referred to as a component). The goodwill impairment
test is a two-step test that compares the fair value of the
reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the
reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
F-101
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is
performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The
second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied
fair value of reporting unit goodwill, which is determined by
performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation as of the
impairment testing date, to the carrying amount of that
goodwill, with any excess of carrying amount over the implied
fair value recognized as an impairment loss. Impairment losses
related to goodwill cannot be reversed.
The cash generating unit is at a lower level in the operation,
than the reporting unit and accordingly under IFRS an impairment
was recorded that is not reflected under US GAAP. The adjustment
included in the tables above reflects the reversal for US GAAP
of the impairment loss recognized for IFRS purposes that was not
recognized for US GAAP purposes due to this differing level at
which goodwill is tested for impairment (cash generating unit
under IFRS vs. reporting unit under US GAAP).
|
|
(d)
|
Research and
development
|
Under IFRS, payments made to acquire research and
development-related assets outside of a business combination,
and patents or licenses for products that are still in the
research or development stage, are eligible for capitalization
under IAS 38, when all of the following conditions are met:
(i) the project meets the definition of an asset,
(ii) the project is identifiable and (iii) the fair
value of the project can be measured reliably. Accordingly,
under IFRS, certain up-front payments made in connection with
collaboration agreements were capitalized and are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Under US GAAP, payments to acquire research and
development-related assets that have no alternative future use
are expensed as of the acquisition date in accordance with
SFAS No. 2.
The adjustment included in the tables above reflects the
immediate write-off of acquired research and development-related
assets in the period of acquisition (EUR 25 million
and EUR 1 million, respectively, for the six-months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively) and for US
GAAP purposes offset by the reversal of amortization expense
and/or
impairments (EUR 5 million and
EUR 4 million, respectively, for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006) recorded for IFRS purposes in
subsequent periods.
The aggregate adjustment for subsequent events presented in the
tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Subsequent events other than
taxes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
(2) Subsequent events
tax-related
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
Under IFRS, the OBS Group has applied IAS 10, Events after
the Balance Sheet Date, and has adjusted its financial
statements for adjusting events identified between
the time the parent company financial statements were issued and
the date on which these OBS Groups financial statements
were issued.
Under US GAAP, practice with respect to the preparation of
carve-out financial statements is to reflect subsequent events
on a consistent basis with the parent company, as the carve-out
financial statements are an extraction of the parent company
accounts, unless the adjustment represents a correction of an
error. The subsequent events for the tax related adjustments
primarily relate to tax settlements received by the OBS group
for transfer pricing.
Under US GAAP, the amounts have been recognized in periods
consistent with Akzo Nobel. Accordingly, the subsequent event
adjustments reflected in the IFRS financial statements have been
reversed under US GAAP.
|
|
(f)
|
Tax on the
elimination of intercompany profits
|
In accordance with IFRS (IAS 12, Income Taxes), the
deferred tax effect of the elimination of intercompany profit in
inventory is calculated using the purchasers tax rate.
Under US GAAP (SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes), no deferred tax assets are recorded for the
difference between the tax base in the buyers jurisdiction
and the amount reported in the combined financial statements;
additionally taxes payable on intercompany transfers recognized
by the seller are deferred in consolidation, hence eliminating
the effects of intercompany transfers in the combined statements
of income.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, this resulted
in an increase in net income of EUR 2 million and a
decrease in invested equity at June 30, 2007 of
EUR 35 million. For the six months ended June 30,
2006, this resulted in a decrease in net income of
EUR 2 million and a decrease in invested equity at
December 31, 2006 of EUR 37 million.
|
|
(g)
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
The aggregate adjustment for income taxes presented in the
tables above consists of the following adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Ended
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
US GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Deferred tax on in-process
research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
(2) Other deferred income tax
impacts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total US GAAP
adjustments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
OBS GROUP
NOTES TO THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(All amounts in millions of euros unless otherwise stated)
|
|
(1)
|
Deferred income
tax on in-process research and development
|
Under IFRS, a deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for
differences in the financial reporting basis and tax basis of
acquired in-process research and development, similar to other
identifiable intangible assets, irrespective of whether the
acquired in-process research and development has basis for tax
purposes. Under US GAAP
(EITF 96-7,
Accounting for Deferred Taxes on In-Process Research and
Development activities acquired in a Business Combination)
in circumstances where there is no tax basis in the acquired
in-process
research and development deferred taxes are not provided on the
initial difference between the amount assigned for financial
reporting and tax purposes and the
in-process
research and development is charged to expense on a gross basis
(without tax benefit) at acquisition. In circumstances where a
tax basis exists for the acquired
in-process
research and development, upon consummation of the business
combination, the
in-process
research and development is immediately charged to expense, a
deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that
realisability is more likely than not.
The deferred tax liability recorded under IFRS results in a
corresponding increase to goodwill. Although this difference
does not affect invested equity (between IFRS and US GAAP) at
the acquisition date, a reclassification adjustment is necessary
under US GAAP to reduce goodwill by the amount of the deferred
tax liability recorded under IFRS in relation to acquired
in-process research and development and to reduce deferred tax
liabilities by a corresponding amount (EUR 8 million).
The impact on income tax expense of this difference when the
acquired in-process research and development is amortized or
impaired for IFRS purposes is reversed under US GAAP.
|
|
(2)
|
Other deferred
income tax impacts
|
This adjustment reflects the deferred tax effects attributable
to the aforementioned pre-tax adjustments. The adoption of
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
during the six-months ended June 30, 2007, did not have an
impact on the OBS Group.
|
|
(h)
|
Other
presentation differences
|
Deferred
income taxes
Under IFRS, deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified
as non-current on the balance sheet based on the timing of their
expected reversal.
Under US GAAP, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
classified as current or non-current on the balance sheet based
on the nature of the balance sheet item to which they relate.
Where no related asset or liability exists (e.g. for net
operating losses), deferred tax assets or liabilities are
classified as current or non-current on the balance sheet based
on the timing of their expected reversal.
Oss, July 30, 2007
The Board of Management
Toon Wilderbeek
F-104
$
Schering-Plough
Corporation
% Senior Notes due 2017
% Senior Notes due 2037
Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
BNP PARIBAS
Credit Suisse
JPMorgan