FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period
from
to
Commission file number: 001-33280
HFF, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
51-0610340
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street, Suite 600
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
15219
(Zip code) |
(412) 281-8714
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant
outstanding as of July 31, 2009 was 16,537,532 shares.
HFF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 |
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 |
|
|
|
|
EX-10.1 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which reflect our
current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. You
can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as outlook, believes,
expects, potential, continues, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates, anticipates or the negative version of these words or other
comparable words. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to
differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe these factors include, but
are not limited to, those described under Risk Factors. These factors should not be construed as
exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or
otherwise.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING THE REGISTRANT
In connection with our initial public offering of our Class A common stock in February 2007,
we effected a reorganization of our business, which had previously been conducted through HFF
Holdings LLC (HFF Holdings) and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. (together, the Operating Partnerships) and Holliday
GP Corp. (Holliday GP). In the reorganization, HFF, Inc., a newly-formed Delaware corporation,
purchased from HFF Holdings all of the shares of Holliday GP, which is the sole general partner of
each of the Operating Partnerships, and approximately 45% of the partnership units in each of the
Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating Partnerships held by Holliday
GP) in exchange for the net proceeds from the initial public offering and one share of Class B
common stock of HFF, Inc. Following this reorganization and as of the closing of the initial public
offering on February 5, 2007, HFF, Inc. is a holding company holding partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships and all of the outstanding shares of Holliday GP. HFF Holdings and HFF,
Inc., through their wholly-owned subsidiaries, are the only limited partners of the Operating
Partnerships. We refer to these transactions collectively in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as
the Reorganization Transactions. Unless we state otherwise, the information in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to these Reorganization Transactions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to (1) HFF Holdings refer solely to HFF
Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was previously the holding company for our
consolidated subsidiaries, and not to any of its subsidiaries, (2) HFF LP refer to Holliday
Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, (3) HFF Securities refer to HFF Securities
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered broker-dealer, (4) Holliday GP refer to
Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation and the general partner of HFF LP and HFF Securities, (5)
HoldCo LLC refer to HFF Partnership Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF, Inc., and (6) Holdings Sub refer to HFF LP Acquisition LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of HFF Holdings. Our business
operations are conducted by HFF LP and HFF Securities which are sometimes referred to in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as the Operating Partnerships. Also, except where specifically
noted, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Company, we or us mean HFF,
Inc., the newly-formed Delaware corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect
to the Reorganization Transactions.
3
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
32,200 |
|
|
$ |
37,028 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 7) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Mortgage notes receivable (Note 8) |
|
|
62,625 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets, net |
|
|
100,979 |
|
|
|
62,430 |
|
Property and equipment, net (Note 4) |
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
125,227 |
|
|
|
123,848 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
Intangible assets, net (Note 5) |
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
7,649 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
242,462 |
|
|
$ |
203,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7) |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Warehouse line of credit (Note 8) |
|
|
62,625 |
|
|
|
16,300 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Payable to affiliate (Note 16) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Current portion of payable to HFF Holdings TRA (Note 12) |
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
71,280 |
|
|
|
25,506 |
|
Deferred rent credit |
|
|
3,514 |
|
|
|
3,793 |
|
Payable to HFF Holdings TRA, less current portion (Note 12) |
|
|
106,131 |
|
|
|
108,287 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion (Note 7) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
181,280 |
|
|
|
137,766 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 175,000,000 authorized, and 16,536,050 and
16,446,480 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 1 share authorized, and 1 share outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
26,786 |
|
|
|
26,206 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
12,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent stockholders equity |
|
|
37,291 |
|
|
|
39,126 |
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 13) |
|
|
23,891 |
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
61,182 |
|
|
|
65,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
242,462 |
|
|
$ |
203,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
15,028 |
|
|
$ |
42,194 |
|
|
$ |
26,898 |
|
|
$ |
73,562 |
|
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
Other |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
43,589 |
|
|
|
29,661 |
|
|
|
75,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
10,195 |
|
|
|
27,041 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
49,351 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
4,858 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
Supplies, research, and printing |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
4,318 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Interest on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,246 |
|
|
|
40,163 |
|
|
|
37,597 |
|
|
|
73,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
(7,936 |
) |
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Decrease in payable under the tax receivable agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / income before income taxes |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
4,341 |
|
|
|
(5,856 |
) |
|
|
7,383 |
|
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income / (loss) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
|
|
2,919 |
|
Net income / (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of Class A common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Dollars in Thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, December
31, 2008 |
|
|
16,446,480 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,206 |
|
|
$ |
12,756 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
$ |
65,626 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
168,833 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock |
|
|
(79,263 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
79,263 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Net (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
16,536,050 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
26,786 |
|
|
$ |
10,513 |
|
|
$ |
23,891 |
|
|
$ |
61,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlling Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, December
31, 2007 |
|
|
16,445,000 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,353 |
|
|
$ |
12,527 |
|
|
$ |
21,784 |
|
|
$ |
59,828 |
|
Stock compensation and other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
Issuance of Class A common stock |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
16,446,480 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,666 |
|
|
$ |
12,627 |
|
|
$ |
24,542 |
|
|
$ |
62,999 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
HFF, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(4,815 |
) |
|
$ |
2,919 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) / income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Amortization of investment security discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
7,834 |
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
Gain on sale or disposition of assets, net |
|
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
Mortgage service rights assumed |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to
Holdings TRA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,580 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
(722 |
) |
Receivable from /payable to affiliates |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Payable to Holdings TRA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
(46,325 |
) |
|
|
(60,015 |
) |
Net borrowings on warehouse line of credit |
|
|
46,325 |
|
|
|
60,015 |
|
Prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
(4,839 |
) |
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(2,590 |
) |
|
|
(3,495 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
|
|
(2,786 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(10,066 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(4,828 |
) |
|
|
(12,944 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
43,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
32,200 |
|
|
$ |
30,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
7
HFF, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
HFF, Inc., through its Operating Partnerships, Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., a Texas limited
partnership (HFF LP) and HFF Securities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and registered
broker-dealer (HFF Securities and together with HFF LP, the Operating Partnerships), is a
commercial real estate financial intermediary that provides commercial real estate and capital
markets services including debt placement, investment sales, structured finance and private equity
placements, investment banking and advisory services, loan sales and loan sale advisory services,
commercial loan servicing and commercial real estate and capital markets advice through its 17
offices in the United States.
HFF LP was acquired on June 16, 2003 and accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No, 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141). The total purchase price
of $8.8 million was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition.
During 2004, HFF LP and Holliday GP Corp., a Delaware corporation (Holliday GP), formed HFF
Securities. HFF Securities is a broker-dealer that performs private placements of securities by
raising equity capital from institutional investors for discretionary, commingled real estate funds
to execute real estate acquisitions, recapitalizations, developments, debt investments, and other
real estate-related strategies. HFF Securities may also provide other investment banking and
advisory services on various project or entity-level strategic assignments such as mergers and
acquisitions, sales and divestitures, recapitalizations and restructurings, privatizations,
management buyouts and arranging joint ventures for specific real estate strategies.
Offering and Reorganization
HFF, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), was formed in November 2006 in connection with a
proposed initial public offering of its Class A common stock. On November 9, 2006, HFF, Inc. filed
a registration statement on Form S-1 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) relating to a proposed underwritten initial public offering of 14,300,000 shares of Class A
common stock of HFF, Inc. (the Offering). On January 30, 2007, the SEC declared the registration
statement on Form S-1 effective and the Company priced 14,300,000 shares for the initial public
offering at a price of $18.00 per share. On January 31, 2007, the Companys common stock began
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HF.
The proceeds of the initial public offering were used to purchase from HFF Holdings all of the
shares of Holliday GP and purchase from HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately
39% of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the Operating
Partnerships held by Holliday GP).
On February 21, 2007, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase an additional 2,145,000
shares of Class A common stock (15% of original issuance) at $18.00 per share. These proceeds were
used to purchase HFF Holdings partnership units representing approximately 6.0% of each of the
Operating Partnerships. The Company did not retain any of the proceeds from the Offering.
In addition to cash received for its sale of all of the shares of Holliday GP and approximately 45%
of partnership units of each of the Operating Partnerships (including partnership units in the
Operating Partnerships held by Holliday GP), HFF Holdings also received an exchange right that will
permit HFF Holdings to exchange interests in the Operating Partnerships for shares of (i) HFF,
Inc.s Class A common stock (the Exchange Right) and (ii) rights under a tax receivable agreement
between the Company and HFF Holdings (the tax receivable agreement). See Notes 12 and 17 for
further discussion of the tax receivable agreement.
As a result of the reorganization, the Company became a holding company through a series of
transactions pursuant to a sale and purchase agreement. Pursuant to the Offering and
reorganization, HFF, Inc.s sole assets are through its wholly-owned subsidiary HFF Partnership
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (HoldCo LLC), partnership interests HFF LP
and HFF Securities and all of the shares of Holliday GP. The transactions that occurred in
connection with the initial public offering and reorganization are referred to as the
Reorganization Transactions.
8
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, include the
accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Holliday GP and
HoldCo LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The purchase of shares of Holliday GP and partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships
are treated as reorganization under common control for financial reporting purposes. HFF Holdings
owned 100% of Holliday GP, HFF LP Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
Sub), and the Operating Partnerships prior to the Reorganization Transactions and continues to
control these entities through HFF, Inc. The initial purchase of shares of Holliday GP and the
initial purchase of units in the Operating Partnerships were accounted for at historical cost, with
no change in basis for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the net assets of HFF Holdings
purchased by HFF, Inc. are reported in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. at HFF
Holdings historical cost.
As the sole stockholder of Holliday GP (the sole general partner of the Operating Partnerships),
HFF, Inc. now operates and controls all of the business and affairs of the Operating Partnerships.
HFF, Inc. consolidates the financial results of the Operating Partnerships, and the ownership
interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships is treated as a noncontrolling interest in
HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial statements. HFF Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiary
(Holdings Sub), and HFF, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (HoldCo LLC and Holliday GP),
are the only partners of the Operating Partnerships following the offering.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim financial information, the
instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X and should be read
in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Accordingly, significant accounting policies and disclosures normally provided have been omitted as
such items are disclosed therein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of
normal and recurring entries considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the
interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as
of the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Therefore, actual results could
differ from those estimates. Furthermore, operating results for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31,
2009.
Consolidation
HFF Inc. controls the activities of the operating partnerships through its 100% ownership interest
of Holliday GP. As such, in accordance with FASB Interpretation 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (revised December 2003) an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (Issued 12/03) and
Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners
Have Certain Rights, Holliday GP consolidates the Operating Partnerships as Holliday GP is the sole
general partner of the Operating Partnerships and the limited partners do not have substantive
participating rights or kick out rights. The ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating
Partnerships is reflected as noncontrolling interest in HFF, Inc.s consolidated financial
statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, include
the accounts of HFF LP, HFF Securities, and HFF, Inc.s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Holliday GP and
HoldCo LLC. The ownership interest of HFF Holdings in HFF LP and HFF Securities is treated as a
noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements of HFF, Inc. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
9
Income Taxes
HFF, Inc. and Holliday GP are corporations, and the Operating Partnerships are limited
partnerships. The Operating Partnerships are subject to state and local income taxes. Income and
expenses of the Operating Partnerships have been passed through and are reported on the individual
tax returns of the members of HFF Holdings and on the corporate income tax returns of HFF, Inc. and
Holliday GP. Income taxes shown on the Companys consolidated statements of income reflect federal
income taxes of the corporation and business and corporate income taxes in various jurisdictions.
These taxes are assessed on the net income of the corporation, including its share of the Operating
Partnerships net income.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates will be recognized in income in the period of the tax rate
change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings Per Share
Subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions, the Company computes net income per share in
accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net income per share is computed by
dividing income available to Class A common stockholders by the weighted average of Class A common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the assumed conversion of
all dilutive securities (see Note 15).
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include mortgage servicing rights under agreements with third-party lenders,
costs associated with obtaining a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) license, a
non-compete agreement, and deferred financing costs.
Servicing rights are capitalized for servicing assumed on loans originated and sold to the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) with servicing retained. Prior to January 1, 2007,
servicing rights were recorded based on an allocation of the carrying amount of the loan and the
servicing right in proportion to the relative fair values at the date of sale. Servicing rights are
subsequently recorded at the lower of cost or market. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an
active, open market with readily available observable prices. Since there is no ready market value
for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted market prices or prices based on sales or
purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights
by estimating the present value of future cash flows associated with servicing the loans.
Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the fair value of servicing
rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions, including the benefits of servicing
(contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float balances), the cost of servicing,
prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate, the expected life of the cash
flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rate are the most sensitive factors
affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights. Management estimates a market
participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market activity and considering the
Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the discount rate by considering the
various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying loans which include the
cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and the
incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment levels of the
underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the commercial loans being
serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the stated maturity date.
As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan runoff. The estimated
value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the SFAS No. 156, Accounting for
Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 156). Under SFAS 156,
the standard requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability at fair value
each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing
contract, regardless of whether explicit consideration is exchanged. The statement also permits a
company to choose to either subsequently measure servicing rights at fair value and to report
changes in fair value in earnings, or to retain the amortization method whereby servicing rights
are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value and are amortized over their expected life. The
Company retained the amortization method upon adoption of SFAS 156, but began recognizing the fair
value of servicing contracts involving no
10
consideration assumed after January 1, 2007, which resulted in the Company recording $0.2 million
and $0.3 million of intangible assets and a corresponding amount to income upon initial recognition
of the servicing rights for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The
Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.7 million of intangible assets and a corresponding amount to
income upon initial recognition of the servicing rights for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company recorded $0.0 million and $0.1 million servicing right
liability and a corresponding amount to expense upon initial recognition of the servicing right
during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Both the income and
expense recognized from servicing rights are recorded in Interest and other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Deferred financing costs are deferred and are being amortized by the straight-line method (which
approximates the effective interest method) over four years.
The Company entered into a non-compete agreement for $0.1 million during February 2008. This
non-compete agreement is being amortized by the straight-line method over three years.
HFF Securities has recognized an intangible asset in the amount of $0.1 million for the costs of
obtaining a FINRA license as a broker-dealer. The license is determined to have an indefinite
useful economic life and is, therefore, not being amortized.
The Company evaluates amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if
circumstances so indicate, for potential impairment. Indicators of impairment monitored by
management include a decline in the level of serviced loans.
Stock Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)),
using the modified prospective method. Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation costs
based on grant-date fair value for all share-based awards granted, modified or settled after
January 1, 2006, as well as for any awards that were granted prior to the adoption for which
requisite service has not been provided as of January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any
share-based awards prior to January 31, 2007. SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement and recognition
of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors
including employee stock options and other forms of equity compensation based on estimated fair
values. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. For restricted stock awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as
the difference between the market value of the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant
and the purchase price paid by the employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded
vesting schedules. Compensation expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are
evaluated on a quarterly basis and updated as necessary.
Investments
From time to time, the Company may invest in available-for-sale securities such as United States
Treasury Bills. These investments are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical instruments. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based
upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. These investments may be classified
as current or long-term assets and are included in Investments or Other noncurrent assets,
respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on managements ability or intention to sell
the investment. The amortization of the discount is recognized as income based on the effective
interest method and is recorded in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Income. The unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale are included net of tax in
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized
gains or losses on these securities are computed on a specific-identification basis and recognized
in Interest and other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company did not
have any investments as of June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
On a periodic basis, management evaluates the carrying value of investments for impairment. With
respect to the investments in United States Treasury Bills, management considers various criteria,
including the duration and extent of a decline in fair value and the ability and intent of
management to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow the value to recover
to determine whether a decline in fair value is other than temporary. If, after considering these
criteria, management believes that a decline is other than temporary, the carrying value of the
security is written down to fair value and recognized in Interest and other income, net in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
11
Comprehensive Income
The Company reports all changes in comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Equity, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income. Comprehensive income includes net income and unrealized gains and losses on securities
available for sale, net of tax.
Comprehensive loss was $0.2 million and $2.2 million for the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2009, respectively, and income of $1.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the same
periods of 2008.
Treasury Stock
The Company records common stock purchased for treasury at cost. At the date of subsequent
reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on the first-in, first-out
basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP FAS No. 167, Amendments to
FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FSP FAS 167) which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to
determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. FSP FAS 167 is effective for fiscal periods ending after
November 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 167 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company. Prior to adoption, the Company will evaluate the impact on its consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (FSP FAS 166) which removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity from FAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 and removes the
exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying special-purpose entities. FSP FAS 166 is effective for
fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 166 is not expected to have
a material impact on the Company.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability has Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions that are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4) which supersedes FSP SFAS 157-3, Determining the
Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the Market for that Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3) and
amends SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) to provide additional guidance on estimating
fair value when the volume and level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have
significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. FSP FAS
157-4 also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is
not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures About Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1) which extends the disclosure requirements of FAS 107
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to interim financial statements. FSP FAS
No. 107-1 was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
FSP FAS 107-1 had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures about Transfers of
Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FSP FAS No. 140-4) which amends FAS
140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities
and FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FSP FAS 140-4 requires extensive
additional disclosures by public entities with continuing involvement in transfers of financial
assets to special-purpose entities and with variable interest entities. FSP FAS 140-4 was
effective for fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 did not
have a material impact on the Company.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP FAS 142-3) which amended the factors to be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB
Statement No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 was effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 14, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The
Company adopted the provision of this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not have a material
impact on the Company.
12
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 changes the accounting and reporting
for minority interests, which will be characterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as
a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changes the accounting for
transactions with minority interest holders. The Company adopted the provisions of this standard on
January 1, 2009, which resulted in a significant change to total equity, as the noncontrolling
interest had been previously classified outside of equity.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP
FAS 157-2) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities including, but not limited to, nonfinancial
assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination that are not
subsequently remeasured at fair value and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment test.
3. Stock Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method.
Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation costs based on grant-date fair value for all
share-based awards granted, modified or settled after January 1, 2006, as well as for any awards
that were granted prior to the adoption for which requisite service has not been provided as of
January 1, 2006. The Company did not grant any share-based awards prior to January 31, 2007. SFAS
123(R) requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment
awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and other forms of equity
compensation based on estimated fair values. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of
stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For restricted stock awards, the fair
value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value of the Companys Class
A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the employee. The Companys
awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation expense is adjusted for
estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period
of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis and updated as necessary.
During the three month period ending June 30, 2009, 9,842 of vested restricted stock units were
converted to Class A common stock and no new restricted stock units were granted. During the three
month period ending June 30, 2009, 13,393 stock options were granted and 1,389 stock options were
forfeited.
The stock compensation cost that has been charged against income for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $0.2 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, which is recorded in Personnel
expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The stock compensation cost that has been
charged against income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $0.2 million and
$0.3 million, respectively. At June 30, 2009, there was approximately $1.1 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to share based awards.
No options vested or were exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
The fair value of vested restricted stock units was $0.2 million at June 30, 2009.
The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock units is 2 years
as of June 30, 2009.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$ |
3,594 |
|
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
Capitalized software costs
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,987 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
11,120 |
|
|
|
10,987 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(6,362 |
) |
|
|
(5,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
|
$ |
5,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
As of June 30, 2009 the Company has recorded, within furniture and equipment, office equipment
under capital leases of $0.5 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.2 million, which is
included within depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Income. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded office equipment under capital leases
of $0.3 million, including accumulated amortization of $0.2 million. See Note 7 for discussion of
the related capital lease obligations.
5. Intangible Assets
The Companys intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
10,388 |
|
|
$ |
(3,296 |
) |
|
$ |
7,092 |
|
|
$ |
9,716 |
|
|
$ |
(2,405 |
) |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
Unamortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINRA license |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
11,111 |
|
|
$ |
(3,777 |
) |
|
$ |
7,334 |
|
|
$ |
10,439 |
|
|
$ |
(2,790 |
) |
|
$ |
7,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company serviced $24.6 billion and $24.5 billion,
respectively, of commercial loans. The Company earned $2.7 million and $5.3 million in servicing
fees and interest on float and escrow balances for the three and six month periods ending June 30,
2009, respectively. The Company earned $2.9 million and $6.0 million in servicing fees and interest
on float and escrow balances for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2008,
respectively. These revenues are recorded as capital markets services revenues in the Consolidated
Statements of Income.
The total commercial loan servicing portfolio includes loans for which there are no corresponding
mortgage servicing rights recorded on the balance sheet, as these servicing rights were assumed
prior to January 1, 2007 and involved no initial consideration paid by the Company. The Company has
recorded mortgage servicing rights of $7.1 million and $7.3 million on $11.5 billion and $11.1
billion, respectively, of the total loans serviced as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The Company stratifies its servicing portfolio based on the type of loan, including life company
loans, commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), Freddie Mac and limited-service life company
loans.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing of the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The significant assumptions utilized to
value servicing rights as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:
Expected life of cash flows: 3 years to 10 years
Discount
rate(1): 15% 20%
Prepayment
rate: 0% 8%
Inflation rate: 2%
Cost to
service: $1,600 $4,220
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the time value of money and the risk of future cash flows related to the possible
cancellation of servicing contracts, transferability restrictions on certain servicing
contracts, concentration in the life company portfolio and large loan risk. |
The above assumptions are subject to change based on managements judgments and estimates of future
changes in the risks related to future cash flows and interest rates. Changes in these factors
would cause a corresponding increase or decrease in the prepayment rates and discount rates used in
our valuation model.
14
Changes in the carrying value of mortgage servicing rights for the six month period ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Sold |
|
|
6/30/09 |
|
|
6/30/09 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
(374 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,719 |
|
|
$ |
4,154 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
Life company |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
Life company
limited |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
(915 |
) |
|
$ |
(442 |
) |
|
$ |
7,092 |
|
|
$ |
8,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV at |
|
Category |
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Sold |
|
|
6/30/08 |
|
|
6/30/08 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
(178 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,981 |
|
CMBS |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
2,842 |
|
Life company |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Life company
limited |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,343 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
$ |
(564 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,994 |
|
|
$ |
6,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts capitalized represent mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated loans
to Freddie Mac and mortgage servicing rights acquired without the exchange of initial
consideration. The Company recorded mortgage servicing rights retained upon the sale of originated
loans to Freddie Mac of $0.6 million and $0.8 million on $168.2 million and $266.9 million of
loans, respectively, during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009 and $0.4 million
and $0.5 million on $153.4 million and $226.7 million of loans, respectively, during the three and
six month periods ending June 30, 2008. The Company recorded mortgage servicing rights acquired
without the exchange of initial consideration of $0.2 million and $0.3 million on $175.0 million
and $386.1 million of loans, respectively, during the three and six month periods ending June 30,
2009 and $0.2 million and $0.7 million on $601.4 million and $1.3 billion of loans, respectively,
during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2008. In June 2009, the Company sold
mortgage servicing rights with a net book value of $0.4 million and recognized a gain on sale of
$1.1 million which is recorded in Interest and other income, net in the consolidated financial
statements. The Company recorded a mortgage servicing liability of $0.1 million, included in other
long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, on $146.4 million of loans,
during the three month period ending March 31, 2009. These amounts are recorded in Interest and
Other Income, net in the consolidated statements of income.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.5 million and $1.0 million during the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.7 million
during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, which is recorded in
Depreciation and Amortization in the consolidated statements of income.
See Note 2 for further discussion regarding treatment of servicing rights prior to January 1, 2007.
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
969 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,557 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,123 |
|
2012 |
|
|
902 |
|
2013 |
|
|
845 |
|
2014 |
|
|
762 |
|
The weighted-average life of the mortgage servicing rights intangible asset was six years at June
30, 2009. The remaining lives of the deferred financing costs and non-compete agreement intangible
assets were one and two years, respectively, at June 30, 2009.
6. Fair Value Measurement
The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 establishes a
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This
hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into the following three levels: Level 1 inputs which are quoted
market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs which are
observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs corroborated by market data for the asset or
liability; and Level 3 inputs which are
15
unobservable inputs based on managements assumptions that are
not corroborated by market data. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities recognized at fair value on
a recurring basis.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, from time to time, the Company
measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets may include mortgage
servicing rights and mortgage notes receivable. The mortgage servicing rights were not measured at
fair value during the second quarter of 2009 as the Company continues to utilize the amortization
method under SFAS 156 and the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the carrying
value at June 30, 2009. See Note 5 for further discussion on the assumptions used in valuing the
mortgage servicing rights and impact on earnings during the period. The fair value of the mortgage
notes receivable was based on prices observable in the market for similar loans and equaled
carrying value at June 30, 2009. Therefore, no lower of cost or fair value adjustment was required.
7. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Bank term note payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The Credit Agreement
On February 5, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of
America (Amended Credit Agreement). The Amended Credit Agreement is comprised of a $40.0 million
revolving credit facility, which replaced the old Credit Agreement that was paid off in connection
with the initial public offering. The Amended Credit Agreement matures on February 5, 2010 and may
be extended for one year based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on
outstanding balances is payable at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two,
three, six or twelve months) plus 200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate
is determined from time to time in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then
applicable consolidated leverage ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds
Rate (0.22% at June 30, 2009) plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (3.25% at June 30, 2009) plus 1.5%.
The Amended Credit Agreement also requires payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3% on the
unused amount of credit based on the total amount outstanding. During the three months ended June
30, 2009, the Company corrected an error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on its
unused line of credit and recorded approximately $260,000 of interest expense that represented the cumulative
amount of commitment fees for the period from February 5, 2007 to March 31, 2009. This correction
was not considered material to restate prior period financial statements. The Company did not
borrow on this revolving credit facility during the period February 5, 2007 through June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, based on Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement as three
times the difference of Consolidated EBITDA, as defined therein, and Consolidated Fixed Charges, as
defined therein, the Company did not have any Availability, as
defined therein, of the $40.0 million in undrawn line of
credit available under this facility. In addition, the financial covenants under the Amended Credit
Agreement currently require us to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of Consolidated Funded
Indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA, each as defined therein, and a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to Consolidated Fixed Charges, each as defined therein. On August 5,
2009, the Company entered into a waiver agreement with Bank of America that waives the financial
requirements of the maximum leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio for the three
month periods ending June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The Company will
not have any Availability under the Amended Credit Agreement during the waiver period unless the
Company is able to regain compliance with the financial covenants. On June 27, 2008, the Company
entered into an amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the
Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax
Distributions, as defined therein, and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations
of HFF LP under the Amended Credit Agreement. On October 30, 2007, the Company entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under
the Amended Credit Agreement, to the extent otherwise available to the Company, is available to the
Company for purposes of originating such Freddie Mac loans (see discussion under Note 8 below).
16
(b) Letters of Credit and Capital Lease Obligations
At each June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has outstanding letters of credit of approximately $0.2 million, respectively, with the same bank as the revolving credit arrangements as security for two leases. The Company segregated cash in a separate bank account to collateralize the letters of credit. The letters of credit expire through 2010 but can be extended for one year.
Capital lease obligations consist primarily of office equipment leases that expire at various dates through May 2012 and bear interest at rates ranging from 3.0% to 9.50%. A summary of future minimum lease payments under capital leases at June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
2010 |
|
|
128 |
|
2011 |
|
|
67 |
|
2012 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Warehouse Line of Credit
In 2005, HFF LP obtained an uncommitted, unlimited warehouse line of credit for the purpose of funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates through Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. (Red Capital). In October 2007, this warehouse line was limited to $150.0 million. In November 2007, the Company entered into an uncommitted $50.0 million line of credit note with The Huntington Bank to serve
as a supplement to the existing warehouse line of credit with Red Capital. The Company also is permitted to use borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement, to the extent the Company otherwise has Availability, as defined under the Amended Credit Agreement, to originate and subsequently sell mortgages in connection with the Companys participation in Freddie Macs Multifamily Program Plus ® Seller/Servicer program. Each funding is separately approved on a
transaction-by-transaction basis and is collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately purchased by Freddie Mac. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, HFF LP had $62.6 million and $16.3 million, respectively, outstanding on the warehouse lines of credit and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes receivable. The Company did not borrow under the Amended Credit Agreement in connection with funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates
or otherwise during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 or during the year ending December 31, 2008. Interest on the warehouse lines of credit is at the 30-day LIBOR rate (0.32% and 1.08% at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) plus a spread. HFF LP is also paid interest on its loan secured by a multifamily loan at the rate in the Freddie Mac note.
9. Lease Commitments
The Company leases various corporate offices, parking spaces, and office equipment under noncancelable operating leases. These leases have initial terms of one to ten years. The majority of the leases have termination clauses whereby the term may be reduced by two to seven years upon prior notice and payment of a termination fee by the Company. Total rental expense charged to operations was $1.5 million and $3.0 million,
respectively, during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008.
Future minimum rental payments for the next five years under operating leases with noncancelable terms in excess of one year and without regard to early termination provisions are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009 |
|
$ |
2,524 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4,672 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,116 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,023 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,926 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,428 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time the Company subleases certain office space to subtenants which may be canceled at any time. The rental income received from these subleases is included as a reduction of occupancy expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
17
The Company also leases certain office equipment under capital leases that expire at various
dates through 2012. See Note 4 and Note 7 above for further description of the assets and related
obligations recorded under these capital leases at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
HFF Holdings is not an obligor, nor does it guarantee any, of the Companys leases.
10. Servicing
The Company services commercial real estate loans for investors. The unpaid principal balance of
the servicing portfolio totaled $24.6 billion and $24.5 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
In connection with its servicing activities, the Company holds funds in escrow for the benefit of
mortgagors for hazard insurance, real estate taxes and other financing arrangements. At June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the funds held in escrow totaled $81.4 million and $96.9 million,
respectively. These funds, and the offsetting liabilities, are not presented in the Companys
consolidated financial statements as they do not represent the assets and liabilities of the
Company. Pursuant to the requirements of the various investors for which the Company services
loans, the Company maintains bank accounts, holding escrow funds, which have balances in excess of
the FDIC insurance limit. The fees earned on these escrow funds are reported in capital markets
services revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
11. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to its business. The Company cannot estimate with certainty its ultimate
legal and financial liability with respect to any pending matters. In accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, a reserve for estimated losses is recorded when the amount is
probable and can be reasonably estimated. However, the Company believes, based on examination of
such pending matters, that its ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on its
business or financial condition.
12. Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes current and deferred taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(1,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(985 |
) |
State |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
(1,197 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2,586 |
) |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
State |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,370 |
) |
|
$ |
7,834 |
|
|
$ |
4.464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The reconciliation between the income tax computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate on net income is as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Pre-tax book (loss) / income |
|
$ |
(5,856 |
) |
|
$ |
7,383 |
|
Less: pre-tax income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder |
|
|
(2,553 |
) |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax book income after noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(3,303 |
) |
|
$ |
4,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Taxes computed at federal rate |
|
$ |
(1,123 |
) |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Change in income tax benefit payable to stockholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1,385 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
)% |
Effect of deferred tax rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
% |
Stock compensation |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
$ |
4,464 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (benefit) / expense recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
included income tax expense of $19,000 and a benefit of $0.1 million of state and local taxes on
income allocated to the noncontrolling interest holder, which represents 0.6% and 2.3% of the total
effective rate, respectively.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 754 election tax basis step-up |
|
$ |
133,076 |
|
|
$ |
136,478 |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
8,678 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Compensation |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Other |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,902 |
|
|
|
141,614 |
|
Less: valuation allowance |
|
|
(15,730 |
) |
|
|
(15,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset |
|
|
127,172 |
|
|
|
125,884 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
Servicing rights |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
Deferred rent |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(1,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
125,366 |
|
|
$ |
124,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management makes estimates and
judgments regarding the level and timing of future taxable income, including reviewing
forward-looking analyses. Based on this analysis and other quantitative and qualitative factors,
management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient taxable income to realize a portion of the deferred tax assets resulting from the
initial basis step up recognized from the Reorganization Transaction. Deferred tax assets
representing the tax benefits to be realized when future payments are made to HFF Holdings under a
tax receivable agreement are currently not more likely than not to be realized and, therefore, have
a valuation allowance of $15.7 million recorded against them. See discussion under the caption Tax
Receivable Agreement below for further information regarding the Companys tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings. The effects of changes in this initial valuation allowance will be
recorded in equity if managements future analysis determines that it is more likely than not that
these benefits will be realized. All other effects of changes in the Companys estimates regarding
the realization of the deferred tax assets will be included in net income. Similarly, the effect of
subsequent changes in the enacted tax rates will be included in net income.
19
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes recognition and
measurement standards for a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two-step process. The first step is the
determination of whether a tax position should be recognized. Under FIN 48, a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return is to be recognized only if the Company determines that it is
more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax
authorities based upon the technical merits of the position. In step two, for those tax positions
which should be recognized, the measurement of a tax position is determined as being the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The
Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the effect of which was immaterial to the consolidated
financial statements. The Company has determined that no unrecognized tax benefits need to be
recorded as of June 30, 2009.
The
Company will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Interest
and other income, net. There were no interest or penalties recorded in the three and six month
periods ending June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the Reorganization Transactions, HFF LP and HFF Securities made an election
under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code for 2007, and intend to keep that election in effect
for each taxable year in which an exchange of partnership units for shares occurs. The initial sale
as a result of the offering increased the tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP and HFF
Securities to their fair market value. This increase in tax basis allows the Company to reduce the
amount of future tax payments to the extent that the Company has future taxable income. As a result
of the increase in tax basis, the Company is entitled to future tax benefits of $133.1 million and
has recorded this amount as a deferred tax asset on its Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has
updated its estimate of these future tax benefits based on the changes to the estimated annual
effective tax rate for 2007. The Company is obligated, however, pursuant to its tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in
U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the Company actually realizes as a result of these
increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company
entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. For purposes
of the tax receivable agreement, actual cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing
the Companys actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been
required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF
Securities as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges had the Company not entered into the
tax receivable agreement.
The Company accounts for the income tax effects and corresponding tax receivable agreement effects
as a result of the initial purchase and the sale of units of the Operating Partnerships in
connection with the Reorganization Transactions and future exchanges of Operating Partnership units
for the Companys Class A shares by recognizing a deferred tax asset for the estimated income tax
effects of the increase in the tax basis of the assets owned by the Operating Partnerships, based
on enacted tax rates at the date of the transaction, less any tax valuation allowance the Company
believes is required. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-10 Accounting by a
Company for the Income Tax Effects of Transactions Among or with its Shareholders under FASB
Statement 109 (EITF 94-10), the tax effects of transactions with shareholders that result in
changes in the tax basis of a companys assets and liabilities will be recognized in equity. If
transactions with shareholders result in the recognition of deferred tax assets from changes in the
Companys tax basis of assets and liabilities, the valuation allowance initially required upon
recognition of these deferred assets will be recorded in equity. Subsequent changes in enacted tax
rates or any valuation allowance are recorded as a component of income tax expense.
The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize a portion of the benefit
represented by the deferred tax asset, and, therefore, the Company recorded 85% of this estimated
amount of the increase in deferred tax assets as a liability to HFF Holdings under the tax
receivable agreement and the remaining 15% of the increase in deferred tax assets directly in
additional paid-in capital in stockholders equity. However, deferred tax assets representing the
tax benefits to be realized when future payments are made to HFF Holdings under the tax receivable
agreement are currently not likely to be realized and, therefore, have a valuation allowance of
$15.7 million recorded against them.
While the actual amount and timing of payments under the tax receivable agreement will depend upon
a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income generated in the future,
changes in future tax rates, the value of individual assets, the portion of the Companys payments
under the tax receivable agreement constituting imputed interest and increases in the tax basis of
the Companys assets resulting in payments to HFF Holdings, the Company has estimated that the
payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $108.3 million and has recorded this obligation
to HFF Holdings as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In conjunction with the filing
of the Companys 2007 federal and state tax returns, the benefit for 2007 relating to the Section
754 basis step-up was finalized resulting in $6.2 million in tax benefits in 2007. As discussed
above, the Company is obligated to remit to HFF
20
Holdings 85% of any such cash savings in federal and state tax. As such, during August 2008, the
Company paid $5.3 million to HFF Holdings under this tax receivable agreement. In addition, during
the year ended December 31, 2008, the tax rates used to measure the deferred tax assets were
updated which resulted in a reduction of deferred tax assets of $4.6 million, which resulted in a
reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement of $3.9 million. To the extent the
Company does not realize all of the tax benefits in future years, this liability to HFF Holdings
may be reduced.
13. Noncontrolling Interest
The noncontrolling interest recorded in the consolidated financial statements relates to the
ownership interest of HFF Holdings in the Operating Partnerships. As a result of the Reorganization
Transactions discussed in Note 1, partners capital was eliminated from equity and noncontrolling
interest of $6.4 million was recorded representing HFF Holdings remaining interest in the
Operating Partnerships. The table below sets forth the noncontrolling interest amount recorded
during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income / (loss) from operating partnerships |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
5,265 |
|
|
$ |
(4,650 |
) |
|
$ |
5,088 |
|
Noncontrolling interest ownership percentage |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
55.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
2,912 |
|
|
$ |
(2,572 |
) |
|
$ |
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, HFF Holdings beneficially owns 20,355,000
partnership units in each of the Operating Partnerships. Pursuant to the terms of the HFF, Inc.s
amended and restated certificate of incorporation, HFF Holdings can from time to time exchange its
partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A common stock on
the basis of two partnership units, one for each Operating Partnership, for one share of Class A
common stock, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends
and reclassifications. The following table reflects the exchangeability of HFF Holdings rights to
exchange its partnership units in the Operating Partnerships for shares of the Companys Class A
common stock, pursuant to contractual provisions in the HFF Holdings operating agreement. However,
these contractual provisions may be waived, amended or terminated by a vote of the members holding
65% of the interests of HFF Holdings following consultation with the Companys Board of Directors.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, HFF, Inc.s amended and restated certificate of incorporation
provides that no holder of Operating Partnership units is entitled to exchange its Operating
Partnership units for shares of Class A common stock if such exchange would be prohibited under
applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of HFF |
|
|
|
Number of Additional |
|
|
Holdings' |
|
|
|
Shares of Class A |
|
|
Partnership Units in |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
the Operating |
|
|
|
Expected to Become |
|
|
Partnerships |
|
|
|
Available for |
|
|
Becoming Eligible |
|
Exchangeability Date: |
|
Exchange |
|
|
for Exchange |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
January 31, 2012 |
|
|
5,088,750 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,355,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all of the partnership units held by HFF Holdings were exchanged for shares of Class A common
stock of HFF, Inc. on June 30, 2009, 20,355,000 shares of Class A common stock with a fair value of
$79.4 million would be issued.
HFF Holdings was issued one share of the Companys Class B common stock. The Class B common stock
has no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes that is equal to the total
number of shares of Class A common stock for which the partnership units that such holder holds at
such time in the Operating Partnerships are exchangeable.
14. Stockholders Equity
The Company is authorized to issue 175,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and one share of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Each share of Class A
common stock entitles its holder to one vote on all matters to be voted on by stockholders
generally. HFF Holdings has been issued one share of Class B common stock. Class B common stock has
no economic rights but entitles the holder to a number of votes equal to the total number of shares
of Class A common stock for which
21
the partnership units that HFF Holdings holds in the Operating Partnerships, as of the relevant
record date for the HFF, Inc. stockholder action, are exchangeable. Holders of Class A and Class B
common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters
presented to the Companys stockholders for
their vote or approval. The Company has issued 16,536,050 and 16,446,480 shares of Class A common
stock and 1 share of Class B common stock as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
15. Earnings Per Share
The Companys net income and weighted average shares outstanding for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income / (loss) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
3,980 |
|
|
$ |
(4,815 |
) |
|
$ |
2,919 |
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,576,022 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,582,292 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,576,022 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,582,292 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
The calculations of basic and diluted net income per share amounts for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are described and presented below.
Basic Net Income per Share
Numerator net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, including 39,972 and 9,630 restricted stock units that have
vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively.
22
Diluted Net Income per Share
Numerator net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 as in the basic net income per share calculation described
above plus (loss) / income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon assumed exercise of
exchange rights.
Denominator the weighted average shares of Class A common stock for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, including 39,972 and 9,630 restricted stock units that have
vested and whose issuance is no longer contingent as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively, plus the dilutive effect of the unrestricted stock units, stock options, and the
issuance of Class A common stock upon exercise of the exchange right by HFF Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Basic Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding |
|
|
16,576,022 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,582,292 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
Basic net income per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
$ |
105 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to noncontrolling interest holder upon
assumed exercise of exchange right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock |
|
|
16,576,022 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,582,292 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
Adddilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest holder exchange right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
16,576,022 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
|
|
16,582,292 |
|
|
|
16,456,110 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
16. Related Party Transactions
The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates of $454 and $34,957, respectively, during the
six month period ended June 30, 2009. The Company made payments on behalf of two affiliates of
$14,363 and $28,917, respectively, during the six month period ended June 30, 2008. The Company
had a net payable to affiliates of approximately $56,000 and $92,000 at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively.
As a result of the Companys initial public offering, the Company entered into a tax receivable
agreement with HFF Holdings that provides for the payment by the Company to HFF Holdings of 85% of
the amount of the cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that the
Company actually realizes as a result of the increase in tax basis of the assets owned by HFF LP
and HFF Securities and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from entering into the tax
receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company will retain the
remaining 15% of cash savings, if any, in income tax that it realizes. For purposes of the tax
receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing the Companys actual
income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there
been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of HFF LP and HFF Securities allocable to the
Company as a result of the initial sale and later exchanges and had the Company not entered into
the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement commenced upon consummation
of the offering and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or have expired.
See Note 12 for further information regarding the tax receivable agreement and Note 17 for the
amount recorded in relation to this agreement.
23
17. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is obligated, pursuant to its tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings, to pay to HFF
Holdings 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax
that the Company actually realizes as a result of the increases in tax basis under Section 754 and
as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from the Company entering into the tax receivable
agreement and making payments under that agreement. The Company has recorded $108.3 million for
this obligation to HFF Holdings as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30,
2009.
From time to time the Company enters into employment agreements with transaction professionals.
Some of these agreements include payments to be made to the transaction professional at a specific
time, if certain conditions have been met. The Company accrues for these payments over the life of
the agreement. The Company has recorded $0.2 million for these employment agreements as a
liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009.
18. Subsequent Events
On July 30, 2009, the Company granted 35,168 restricted stock units with a contractual term of 3
years and a fair value of $0.2 million on the grant date.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009, the date which these financial
statements were issued.
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the financial position of HFF, Inc. and its subsidiaries
as of June 30, 2009, and the results of our operations for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2009, and should be read in conjunction with (i) the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and (ii) the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Our Business
We are one of the leading providers of commercial real estate and capital markets services to
the U.S. commercial real estate industry based on transaction volume and are one of the largest
full-service commercial real estate financial intermediaries in the country.
Substantially all of our revenues are in the form of capital markets services fees collected
from our clients, usually negotiated on a transaction-by-transaction basis. We also earn fees from
commercial loan servicing activities. We believe that our multiple product offerings, diverse
client mix, expertise in a wide range of property types and national platform create a stable and
diversified revenue stream.
We operate in one reportable segment, the commercial real estate financial intermediary
segment, and offer debt placement, investment sales, distressed debt and real estate owned advisory
service, structured finance, equity placement, investment banking services, loan sales and
commercial loan servicing.
Our business may be significantly affected by factors outside of our control, particularly
including:
|
|
Economic and commercial real estate market downturns. Our business is dependent on favorable
international and domestic economic conditions and the demand for commercial real estate and
related services in the markets in which we operate. A slow down, a significant downturn
and/or recession in either the global economy and/or the domestic economy, which is currently
the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future (including but not limited to
even a regional economic downturn) could adversely affect the performance of commercial real
estate as well as our business, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. A general decline in acquisition and disposition activity can lead to a
reduction in fees and commissions for arranging such transactions, as well as in fees and
commissions for arranging financing for acquirers and property owners that are seeking to
recapitalize their existing properties, as is currently the case and is expected to continue
for the foreseeable future. Likewise, a general decline in commercial real estate investment
activity can lead to a reduction in fees and commissions for arranging acquisitions,
dispositions and financings for acquisitions as well as for recapitalizations for existing
property owners and a significant reduction in our loan servicing activities (due to increased
delinquencies and defaults and lack of additional loans that we would have otherwise added to
our loan servicing portfolio) all of which would have an adverse effect on our business as is
currently the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Global and domestic credit and liquidity issues. Global and domestic credit and liquidity
issues have led to and are expected to continue to lead to an economic downturn, including but
not limited to a commercial real estate market downturn, which in turn has led to a decrease
in transaction activity and lower values, all of which are expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. The current situation in the global credit markets whereby many world
governments (including but not limited to the U.S. where the Company transacts virtually all
of its business) have had to take unprecedented and uncharted steps to either support the
financial institutions in their respective countries from collapse or take direct ownership of
same is unprecedented in the Companys history. Restrictions on the availability of capital to
the broad market as a whole, both debt and/or equity, have created significant reductions and
could further reduce the liquidity in and flow of capital to the commercial real estate
markets, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
These restrictions could also cause commercial real estate prices to decrease due to the
reduced amount of equity capital and debt financing available, as is currently the case and is
expected to continue for the foreseeable future. In particular, global and domestic credit and
liquidity issues may reduce the number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan originations, as
well as the respective number of transactions and transaction volumes, which could also
adversely affect our capital markets services revenues including our servicing revenue, as is
currently the case and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. |
25
|
|
Decreased investment allocation to commercial real estate class. Allocations to commercial
real estate as an asset class for investment portfolio diversification may decrease for a
number of reasons beyond our control, including but not limited to poor performance of the
asset class relative to other asset classes or superior performance of other asset classes
when compared with continued good performance of the commercial real estate asset class, or
the poor performance of all assets classes. In addition, while commercial real estate is now
viewed as an accepted and valid class for portfolio diversification, if this perception
changes, there could be a significant reduction in the amount of debt and equity capital
available in the commercial real estate sector. In particular, reductions in debt and/or
equity allocations to commercial real estate may reduce the number of acquisitions,
dispositions and loan originations, as well as the respective number of transactions and
transaction volumes, which could also adversely affect our capital markets services revenues
including our servicing revenue, as is currently the case and is expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Fluctuations in interest rates. Significant fluctuations in interest rates as well as steady
and protracted movements of interest rates in one direction (increases or decreases) could
adversely affect the operation and income of commercial real estate properties as well as the
demand from investors for commercial real estate investments. Both of these events could
adversely affect investor demand and the supply of capital for debt and equity investments in
commercial real estate. In particular, increased interest rates may cause prices to decrease
due to the increased costs of obtaining financing and could lead to decreases in purchase and
sale activities, thereby reducing the amounts of investment sales and loan originations and
related servicing fees. If our investment sales origination and servicing businesses are
negatively impacted, it is likely that our other lines of business would also suffer due to
the relationship among our various capital markets services. |
The factors discussed above have affected and continue to be a risk to our business as
evidenced by the significant disruptions in the global capital and credit markets, especially in
the domestic capital markets. In particular, global and domestic credit and liquidity issues
reduced in 2008, and the first half of 2009, and are likely to continue to reduce for the
foreseeable future, the number of acquisitions, dispositions and loan originations, as well as the
respective number of transactions and transaction volumes. This has had and may continue to have a
significant adverse effect on our capital markets services revenues for the foreseeable future. The
significant balance sheet issues of many of the CMBS lenders, banks, life insurance companies,
captive finance companies and other financial institutions have adversely affected and will likely
continue to adversely affect the flow of commercial mortgage debt to the U.S. capital markets and
can potentially adversely affect all of our capital markets services platforms and resulting
revenues, all of which are expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
The ongoing economic slow down and/or domestic and global economic recession also continue to
be a risk, which is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, not only due to the potential
negative adverse impacts on the performance of U.S. commercial real estate markets, but also to the
ability of lenders and equity investors to generate significant profits and capital to continue to
make loans and equity investments available to the commercial real estate market, especially in the
U.S. where we operate.
Other factors that may adversely affect our business are discussed under the heading
Forward-Looking Statements and under the caption Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
26
Results of Operations
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and June 30, 2008. The table included in the period comparisons below provides summaries of
our results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not
necessarily indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and
indicators included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Key
Financial Measures and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
15,028 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
$ |
42,194 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
$ |
(27,166 |
) |
|
|
(64.4 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(59.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
16,433 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
43,589 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(27,156 |
) |
|
|
(62.3 |
)% |
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
10,195 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
% |
|
|
27,041 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
% |
|
|
(16,846 |
) |
|
|
(62.3 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,462 |
) |
|
|
(75.6 |
)% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
(1,909 |
) |
|
|
(79.3 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
4,157 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
18,246 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
% |
|
|
40,163 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
|
(21,917 |
) |
|
|
(54.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(1,813 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
)% |
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
(5,239 |
) |
|
|
(152.9 |
)% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / income before income taxes |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
4,341 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
(4,481 |
) |
|
|
(103.2 |
)% |
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(164.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
(3,889 |
) |
|
|
(97.7 |
)% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2,912 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
(2,621 |
) |
|
|
(90.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,268 |
) |
|
|
(118.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to $43.6 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $27.2 million, or 62.3%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms brought about, in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a slowing economy
and/or recession, both globally and domestically.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the three months ended June 30,
2009 decreased $27.2 million, or 64.4%, to $15.0 million from $42.2 million for the same
period in 2008. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the second quarter of 2009 compared to
the second quarter of 2008, brought about in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a slowing
economy and/or recession, both globally and domestically. |
|
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $1.0 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2008, an
increase of $0.5 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of
Freddie Mac loans in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consists of expense reimbursements from clients related
to out-of-pocket costs incurred, were approximately $0.4 million for the three month period
ended June 30, 2009 and $0.9 million for the three month period |
27
|
|
ending June 30, 2008, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 59.3%. Other revenues decreased primarily
as a result of the decrease in production volumes. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $18.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $40.2 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $21.9
million, or 54.6%. Expenses decreased primarily due to decreased cost of services due to a decrease
in capital markets services revenue, decreased personnel costs primarily due to a decrease in
revenue and decreased travel and entertainment and supplies, research and printing.
|
|
The costs of services for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $16.8 million, or
62.3%, to $10.2 million from $27.0 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Also contributing to the
decrease in cost of services is the impact of our cost saving initiatives to reduce headcount
and suspend the Companys 401(k) matching contribution. Cost of services as a percentage of
capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 66.3% and 62.8% for the three
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. This percentage increase is
primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost of services, such as salaries for our
analysts and fringe benefit costs, being spread over a lower revenue base. |
|
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $1.3 million, or 49.2%, to $1.4 million
from $2.7 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease
in profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating income during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and a decrease in salaries due to a lower headcount. |
|
|
|
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income was $0.2 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. At June 30,
2009, there was approximately $1.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to share
based awards. The weighted average remaining contractual term of the nonvested restricted stock
units is two years as of June 30, 2009. The weighted average remaining contractual term of the
nonvested options is twelve years as of June 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $3.4 million, or 53.7%, to $2.9 million compared to
the same period in 2008. These decreases are primarily due to decreased supplies, research and
printing and travel and entertainment costs stemming from the decrease in capital markets
services revenues and the impact of our cost saving initiatives. |
|
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were $3.8
million in the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 9.2%, versus
$4.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily related to
decreased marketing and advertising expense of $0.2 million, decreased outsourcing of $0.2
million and a decrease in professional fees of $0.3 million. These decreases were slightly
offset by increased interest on warehouse lines of credit of $0.3 million due to the increased
volume of Freddie Mac loans. |
Net Income. Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.1 million, a
decrease of $3.9 million versus income of $4.0 million for the same fiscal period in 2008. We
attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being a decrease of
revenues of $27.2 million. Contributing to our lower net income was increased interest expense
which was offset by increased interest and other income, net and an income tax benefit.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.0 million,
an increase of $1.1 million as compared to $0.9 million for the same fiscal period in 2008.
This increase is primarily due to recognizing a $1.1 million gain on the sale of servicing
rights on certain loans that we serviced. |
|
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the three months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $0.3
million, an increase of $0.3 million from $5,000 of similar expenses incurred in the three
months ended June 30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to the recording of the commitment
fee on the unused amount of credit on our Amended Credit Agreement. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company corrected an error related to previously unrecorded
commitment fees on its unused line of credit and recorded approximately $260,000 of interest expense that
represented the cumulative amount of commitment fees for the period from February 5, 2007 to
March 31, 2009 and recorded an additional $30,000 of expense related to the three months ended
June 30, 2009. The prior period correction was not considered material to restate prior
period financial statements. |
28
|
|
Income tax benefit was approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009, as compared to income tax expense of $0.4 million in the three months ended June 30,
2008. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in net operating income experienced
during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period of the prior year.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a current income tax expense
of approximately $0.1 million which was offset by deferred
income tax benefit of approximately $0.4 million. |
Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and June 30, 2008. The table included in the period comparisons below provides summaries of our
results of operations. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily
indicative of future results. For a description of the key financial measures and indicators
included in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the discussion under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Key Financial Measures
and Indicators in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, unless percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets services revenue |
|
$ |
26,898 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
% |
|
$ |
73,562 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(46,664 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
)% |
Interest on mortgage notes receivable |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
29,661 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
75,769 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(46,108 |
) |
|
|
(60.9 |
)% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
49,351 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
% |
|
|
(28,467 |
) |
|
|
(57.7 |
)% |
Personnel |
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
(29.8 |
)% |
Occupancy |
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Travel and entertainment |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
(2,398 |
) |
|
|
(61.7 |
)% |
Supplies, research and printing |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
(71.2 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
37,597 |
|
|
|
126.8 |
% |
|
|
73,881 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
(36,284 |
) |
|
|
(49.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) / income |
|
|
(7,936 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
)% |
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
(9,824 |
) |
|
|
(520.3 |
)% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
Decrease in payable under the tax
receivable agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
(3,580 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / income before income taxes |
|
|
(5,856 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
)% |
|
|
7,383 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
(13,239 |
) |
|
|
(179.3 |
)% |
Income tax (benefit) / expense |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
4,464 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
(5,505 |
) |
|
|
(123.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income |
|
|
(4,815 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
)% |
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(7,734 |
) |
|
|
(265.0 |
)% |
Net (loss) / income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
(5,386 |
) |
|
|
(191.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) / income attributable to
controlling interest |
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(2,348 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM - Not Meaningful
Revenues. Our total revenues were $29.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to $75.8 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $46.1 million, or 60.9%.
Revenues decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in production volumes in several of our
capital markets services platforms brought about, in significant part, by the unprecedented
disruptions in the global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a slowing economy
and/or recession, both globally and domestically.
|
|
The revenues we generated from capital markets services for the six months ended June 30,
2009 decreased $46.7 million, or 63.4%, to $26.9 million from $73.6 million for the same
period in 2008. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in both the number and
the average dollar value of transactions closed during the first half of 2009 compared to the
first half of 2008, brought about in significant part, by the unprecedented disruptions in the
global and domestic capital and credit markets coupled with a slowing economy and/or
recession, both globally and domestically. |
|
|
The revenues derived from interest on mortgage notes receivable were $1.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2008, an increase
of $0.9 million. Revenues increased primarily as a result of increased volume of Freddie Mac
loans in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008. |
29
|
|
The other revenues we earned, which consists of expense reimbursements from clients related
to out-of-pocket costs incurred, were approximately $1.2 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 and $1.5 million for the six month period ending June 30, 2008. |
Total Operating Expenses. Our total operating expenses were $37.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $73.9 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $36.3
million, or 49.1%. Expenses decreased primarily due to decreased cost of services and personnel
costs as a result of the decrease in capital markets services revenue and cost savings initiatives,
and decreased supplies, research and printing, travel and entertainment, professional fees and
marketing and advertising.
|
|
The costs of services for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $28.5 million, or
57.7%, to $20.9 million from $49.4 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is
primarily the result of the decrease in commissions and other incentive compensation directly
related to the decrease in capital markets services revenues. Also contributing to the
decrease in cost of services is the impact of our cost saving initiatives in reduced headcount
and the suspension of the Companys 401(k) matching contribution. Cost of services as a
percentage of capital markets services and other revenues were approximately 74.4% and 65.8%
for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. This percentage
increase is primarily attributable to the fixed portion of cost of services, such as salaries for our analysts and
fringe benefit costs, being spread over a lower revenue base. |
|
|
Personnel expenses that are not directly attributable to providing services to our clients
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased approximately $1.4 million, or 29.8%, to $3.4 million from
$4.9 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in
profit participation expense resulting from the lower operating income during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and a decrease in salaries due to a lower headcount. |
|
|
The stock compensation cost, included in personnel expenses, which has been charged against
income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.6 million as compared to $0.3 million for
the same period in 2008. At June 30, 2009, there was approximately $1.1 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to share based awards. The weighted average remaining contractual term
of the nonvested restricted stock units is two years as of June 30, 2009. The weighted average
remaining contractual term of the nonvested options is twelve years as of June 30, 2009. |
|
|
Occupancy, travel and entertainment, and supplies, research and printing expenses for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $5.5 million, or 45.7%, to $6.5 million compared to the
same period in 2008. These decreases are primarily due to decreased supplies, research and
printing and travel and entertainment costs stemming from the decrease in capital markets
services revenues and the impact of our cost saving initiatives. |
|
|
Other expenses, including costs for insurance, professional fees, depreciation and
amortization, interest on our warehouse line of credit and other operating expenses, were $6.8
million in the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 11.7%, versus
$7.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily related to
decreases in a number of cost categories such as marketing and advertising, outsourcing and
licensing, postage and delivery charges, professional fees and other general and
administrative costs. These decreases were partially offset by increased interest on our
warehouse lines of credit supporting our Freddie Mac loan business and increased amortization
on our mortgage servicing rights intangible assets. |
Net (Loss) / Income. Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $4.8 million, a
decrease of $7.7 million versus income of $2.9 million for the same fiscal period in 2008. We
attribute this decrease to several factors, with the most significant cause being a decrease of
revenues of $46.1 million.
|
|
Interest and other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.4 million, an
increase of $0.5 million as compared to $1.9 million for the same fiscal period in 2008. This
increase is primarily due to recognizing a $1.1 million gain on the sale of servicing rights
on certain loans that we service partially offset by lower interest income earned on our cash
balances. |
|
|
The interest expense we incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $0.3 million,
an increase of $0.3 million from $11,000 of similar expenses incurred in the six months ended
June 30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to the recording of the commitment fee on the
unused amount of credit on our Amended Credit Agreement. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, the Company corrected an error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on its
unused line of credit and recorded approximately $230,000 of interest expense that represented the
cumulative amount of commitment fees for the period from February 5, 2007 to
|
30
|
|
December 31, 2008 and recorded an additional $60,000 of expense related to the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The prior period correction was not considered material to restate prior period
financial statements. |
|
|
Income tax benefit was approximately $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a
difference of $5.5 million from income tax expense of $4.5 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in net operating income
experienced during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in the prior
year. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a current income tax
expense of $0.2 million and a deferred income tax benefit of $1.2 million. During the six
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded a current
income tax benefit of approximately $3.4 million
and a deferred income tax expense of approximately $7.8 million. |
Financial Condition
Total assets increased to $242.5 million at June 30, 2009, from $203.4 million at December 31,
2008, primarily due to:
|
|
An increase in mortgage notes receivable of $46.3 million due to a higher balance of loans
pending sale to Freddie Mac at June 30, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
An increase in deferred tax assets of $1.2 million, due to an increase in the net operation
loss carryforward. |
|
|
|
These increases were partially offset by the following decreases: |
|
|
|
A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $4.8 million. |
|
|
|
A decrease in prepaid taxes of $1.3 million primarily due to a refund of federal taxes paid
in prior periods. |
Total liabilities increased to $181.3 million at June 30, 2009, from $137.8 million at
December 31, 2008, primarily due to:
|
|
An increase of $46.3 million in the warehouse lines of credit due to a higher balance of
loans pending sale to Freddie Mac at June 30, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008. |
This increase was partially offset by a decrease in accrued compensation and related taxes due
to payment of year end bonus accruals and a decrease in commission accrual primarily due to lower
production volumes.
Cash Flows
Our historical cash flows are primarily related to the timing of receipt of transaction fees,
the timing of distributions to members of HFF Holdings and payment of commissions and bonuses to
employees.
2009
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $4.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net
cash of $4.5 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $4.8 million net
loss and a $2.6 million decrease in accrued compensation and related taxes. These uses of cash were
partially offset by the decrease in deferred taxes of $1.2 million and prepaid taxes, prepaid expenses and other current assets of
$2.0 million. Cash of $20,000 was used for investing in property and equipment. Financing
activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on certain capital leases and $0.2 million of
cash was used to purchase treasury stock.
2008
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $12.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net
cash of $2.8 million was used in operating activities, primarily resulting from a $4.8 million
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and a $3.5 million decrease in accrued
compensation and related taxes. These uses of cash were partially offset by the decrease in
deferred taxes of $7.8 million. Cash of $9.9 million was used to purchase a six month United States
Treasury Note and $0.2 million was used for investing in property and equipment and entering into a
non-compete agreement. Financing activities used $0.1 million of cash for the payments on certain
capital leases and distributions to the noncontrolling interest holder.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our current assets typically have consisted primarily of cash and accounts receivable in
relation to earned transaction fees. At June 30, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $32.2 million were invested or held in a mix of money market funds, bank demand
deposit accounts and a three month United States Treasury Note at two financial institutions. Our
liabilities have typically consisted of accounts payable and accrued compensation. We regularly
monitor our liquidity position, including cash level, credit lines, interest and payments on debt,
capital expenditures and other matters relating to liquidity and to compliance with regulatory net
capital requirements. We have historically maintained a line of credit under our revolving credit
facility in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements.
In accordance with the Operating Partnerships partnership agreements, and approval from the
board of directors of HFF, Inc. and GP Corp (as general partner of the Operating Partnerships), the
Operating Partnerships make quarterly distributions to its partners, including HFF, Inc., based on
taxable income, if any, in an amount sufficient to cover all applicable taxes payable by the
members of HFF Holdings and by us and to cover dividends, if any, declared by the board of
directors. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Operating Partnerships did not make any
such distributions to HFF Holdings. However, we anticipate the Operating Partnerships will make a
distribution of approximately $1.5 million to HFF Holdings during 2009. These distributions
decrease the noncontrolling interest balance on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Over the six month period ended June 30, 2009, we used approximately $4.5 million of cash from
operations. Our short-term liquidity needs are typically related to compensation expenses and other
operating expenses such as occupancy, supplies, marketing, professional fees and travel and
entertainment. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred approximately $37.6 million in
total operating expenses. A large portion of our operating expenses are variable, highly correlated
to our revenue streams and dependent on the collection of transaction fees. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, approximately 28.4% of our operating expenses were variable expenses. Our cash
flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to enable us to meet our
objectives. However, if the current state of the economy continues to deteriorate at the rate it
did during 2008 and the first half of 2009, and if this continues for the foreseeable future and
continues to adversely impact our capital markets services revenues, we may be unable to generate
enough cash flow from operations to meet our operating needs and therefore we could use all or
substantially all of our existing cash reserves on hand. Since September 30, 2008, we have
eliminated approximately 100 positions and have initiated other cost saving actions that we
anticipate will result in approximately $9.8 million of annual cost savings. We will continue to
evaluate other opportunities for cost savings. We currently believe that cash flows from operating
activities and our existing cash balance will provide adequate liquidity and are sufficient to meet
our working capital needs for the foreseeable future.
Our tax receivable agreement with HFF Holdings entered into in connection with our initial
public offering provides for the payment by us to HFF Holdings of 85% of the amount of cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income taxes that we actually realize as a result
of the increases in tax basis and as a result of certain other tax benefits arising from our
entering into the tax receivable agreement and making payments under that agreement. We have
estimated that the payments that will be made to HFF Holdings will be $108.3 million, of which
approximately $2.2 million is estimated to be paid during 2009. Our liquidity needs related to our
long term obligations are primarily related to our facility leases. Additionally, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred approximately $3.8 million in occupancy expenses and approximately $0.3
million in interest expense.
We entered into an Amended Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. for a new $40.0 million
line of credit that was put in place contemporaneously with the consummation of the initial public
offering. This new credit facility matures on February 5, 2010 and may be extended for one year
based on certain conditions as defined in the agreement. Interest on outstanding balance is payable
at the applicable LIBOR rate (for interest periods of one, two, three, six or twelve months) plus
200 basis points, 175 basis points or 150 basis points (such rate is determined from time to time
in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, based on our then applicable consolidated leverage
ratio) or at interest equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate (0.22% at June 30, 2009)
plus 0.5% and (b) the Prime Rate (3.25% at June 30, 2009) plus 1.5%. The Amended Credit Agreement
also requires payment of a commitment fee of 0.2% or 0.3% on the unused amount of credit based on
the total amount outstanding. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company corrected an
error related to previously unrecorded commitment fees on its unused line of credit and recorded
$0.3 million of interest expense that represented the cumulative amount of commitment fees for the
period from February 5, 2007 to March 31, 2009. This correction was not considered material to
restate prior period financial statements. As of June 30, 2009, based on Availability, as defined
under the Amended Credit Agreement as three times the difference of Consolidated EBITDA, as defined
therein, and Consolidated Fixed Charges, as defined therein, the Company did not have any
Availability of the $40.0 million in undrawn line of credit available under this facility. In
addition, the financial covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement currently require us to
maintain a maximum leverage ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated
32
EBITDA, each as defined therein, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to
Consolidated Fixed Charges, each as defined therein. On August 5, 2009, the Company entered into a
waiver agreement with Bank of America that waives the financial requirements of the maximum
leverage ratio and minimum fixed charge coverage ratio for the three months periods ending June 30,
2009, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. The Company will not have any Availability under
the Amended Credit Agreement during the waiver period unless the Company is able to regain
compliance with the financial covenants. On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to
the Amended Credit Agreement to modify the calculation of the Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage
Ratio, as defined therein, as it relates to the Quarterly Tax Distributions, as defined therein,
and to modify certain annual and quarterly reporting obligations of HFF LP under the Amended Credit
Agreement. The Company did not borrow on this revolving credit facility from its inception through
June 30, 2009.
On October 29, 2008, Bank of America announced plans that they would participate in the U.S.
governments Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and has subsequently applied for and received
additional assistance from the U.S government. As of this time, we are unable to determine what
impact, if any, this may have on our ability to utilize our line of credit under the Amended Credit
Agreement.
In 2005, we entered into an uncommitted financing arrangement with Red Mortgage Capital, Inc.
(Red Capital) to fund our Freddie Mac loan closings. Pursuant to this arrangement, Red Capital
funds multifamily Freddie Mac loan closings on a transaction-by-transaction basis, with each loan
being separately collateralized by a loan and mortgage on a multifamily property that is ultimately
purchased by Freddie Mac. On December 31, 2008, National City Corporation, which was the parent
company of Red Capital, was merged with and into The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., which has
also participated and received assistance from the TARP program Although we have not experienced
any material changes with our uncommitted financing arrangement with Red Capital, as of this time
we are unable to determine what impact, if any, this transaction may have on
our ability to continue to obtain financing from Red Capital to support our participation in
Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer Program.
In October 2007, as a result of increases in the volume of the Freddie Mac loans that HFF LP
originates as part of its participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program and
recently imposed borrowing limits under the financing arrangement with Red Capital of $150.0
million, we began pursuing alternative financing arrangements to potentially supplement or replace
our existing financing arrangement with Red Capital. On October 30, 2007, we entered into an
amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement to clarify that the $40.0 million line of credit under
the Amended Credit Agreement, to the extent the Company otherwise has Availability, as defined
under the Amended Credit Agreement, is available to us for purposes of originating such Freddie Mac
loans. In addition, in November 2007, we obtained a $50.0 million financing arrangement from The
Huntington National Bank to supplement our Red Capital financing arrangement. The Red Capital and
Huntington National Bank financing arrangements are only for the purpose of supporting our
participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller Servicer program, and cannot be used for any
other purpose. As of June 30, 2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $62.6 million under the Red
Capital/Huntington National Bank arrangements and a corresponding amount of mortgage notes
receivable. The Company did not borrow under the Amended Credit Agreement in connection with
funding the Freddie Mac mortgage loans that it originates or otherwise during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 or during the year ended December 31, 2008. Although we believe that
our current financing arrangements with Red Capital and The Huntington Bank are sufficient to meet
our current needs in connection with our participation in Freddie Macs Program Plus Seller
Servicer program, in the event we are not able to secure financing for our Freddie Mac loan
closings, we will cease originating such Freddie Mac loans until we have available financing.
Critical Accounting Policies; Use of Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates
and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in
our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience
and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions,
estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective and they and our actual results may
change negatively based on changing circumstances or changes in our analyses. If actual amounts are
ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations
for the period in which the actual amounts become known. We believe the following critical
accounting policies could potentially produce materially different results if we were to change
underlying assumptions, estimates and/or judgments. See the notes to our consolidated financial
statements for a summary of our significant accounting policies.
Goodwill. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we evaluate goodwill for potential impairment annually or
more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. In this process, we make
estimates and assumptions in order to determine the fair value of the Company. In determining the
33
fair value of the Company for purposes of evaluating goodwill for impairment, we utilize an
enterprise market capitalization approach. In applying this approach, we use the closing stock
price of our Class A common stock as of the measurement date multiplied by the sum of current
outstanding shares and an estimate of a control premium. As of July 31, 2009, managements analysis
indicates that a greater than 50.0% decline in the estimated enterprise value of the Company may
result in the recorded goodwill being impaired and would require management to measure the amount
of the impairment charge. Goodwill is considered impaired if the recorded book value of goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill as determined under this valuation technique. We
use our best judgment and information available to us at the time to perform this review.
Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets primarily include mortgage servicing rights under
agreements with third party lenders. Servicing rights are recorded at the lower of cost or market.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily available observable
prices. Since there is no ready market value for the mortgage servicing rights, such as quoted
market prices or prices based on sales or purchases of similar assets, the Company determines the
fair value of the mortgage servicing rights by estimating the present value of future cash flows
associated with the servicing the loans. Management makes certain assumptions and judgments in
estimating the fair value of servicing rights. The estimate is based on a number of assumptions,
including the benefits of servicing (contractual servicing fees and interest on escrow and float
balances), the cost of servicing, prepayment rates (including risk of default), an inflation rate,
the expected life of the cash flows and the discount rate. The cost of servicing and discount rates
are the most sensitive factors affecting the estimated fair value of the servicing rights.
Management estimates a market participants cost of servicing by analyzing the limited market
activity and considering the Companys own internal servicing costs. Management estimates the
discount rate by considering the various risks involved in the future cash flows of the underlying
loans which include the cancellation of servicing contracts, concentration in the life company
portfolio and the incremental risk related to large loans. Management estimates the prepayment
levels of the underlying mortgages by analyzing recent historical experience. Many of the
commercial loans being serviced have financial penalties for prepayment or early payoff before the
stated maturity date. As a result, the Company has consistently experienced a low level of loan
runoff. The estimated value of the servicing rights is impacted by changes in these assumptions. As
of June 30, 2009, the fair value and net book value of the servicing rights were $8.1 million and
$7.1 million, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the level of assumed prepayments would
decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 1.8%, 3.5%
and 5.1%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in cost of servicing of the servicing business
would decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to
19.3%, 38.6% and 57.9%, respectively. A 10%, 20% and 30% increase in the discount rate would
decrease the estimated fair value of the servicing rights at the stratum level by up to 3.3%, 6.3%
and 9.2%, respectively. The effect of a variation in each of these assumptions on the estimated
fair value of the servicing rights is calculated independently without changing any other
assumption. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated
servicing income which results in an accelerated level of amortization over eight years. We
evaluate amortizable intangible assets on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances so
indicate, for potential impairment.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards, if any. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates are recognized in income in the period
of the tax rate change. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
Our effective tax rate is sensitive to several factors including changes in the mix of our
geographic profitability. We evaluate our estimated tax rate on a quarterly basis to reflect
changes in: (i) our geographic mix of income, (ii) legislative actions on statutory tax rates, and
(iii) tax planning for jurisdictions affected by double taxation. We continually seek to develop and implement potential strategies and/or
actions that would reduce our overall effective tax rate.
The net deferred tax asset of $125.4 million at June 30, 2009 is comprised mainly of a $133.1
million deferred tax asset related to the Section 754 election tax basis step up, net of a $15.7
million valuation allowance. The net deferred tax asset related to the Section 754 election tax
basis step up of $117.3 million represents annual tax deductions of approximately $17.0 million
through 2022. In order to realize the annual benefit of approximately $17.0 million, the Company
needs to generate approximately $155 million in revenue each year, assuming a constant cost
structure. In the event that the Company cannot realize the annual benefit of $17.0 million each
year, the shortfall becomes a net operating loss that can be carried back 2 years to offset prior
years taxable income or carried forward 20 years to offset future taxable income. The Companys
inability to generate a sufficient level of taxable income through the carryforward period would
result in the recording of a valuation allowance as a charge to income tax expense and a
corresponding reduction in the payable under the tax receivable agreement which would be recorded
as income in the Consolidated
34
Statements of Income. In evaluating the realizability of these
deferred tax assets, management makes estimates and judgments regarding the level and timing of
future taxable income, including reviewing forward-looking analyses. Based on this analysis and
other quantitative and qualitative factors, management believes that it is currently more likely
than not that the Company will be able to generate sufficient taxable income to realize a portion
of the deferred tax assets resulting from the initial basis step up recognized from the
Reorganization Transaction.
Leases. The Company leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements. These lease
agreements typically contain tenant improvement allowances. The Company records tenant improvement
allowances as a leasehold improvement asset, included in property and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheet, and a related deferred rent liability and amortizes them on a
straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease or useful life of the asset as
additional depreciation expense and a reduction to rent expense, respectively. Lease agreements
sometimes contain rent escalation clauses or rent holidays, which are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the life of the lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. Lease terms
generally range from one to ten years. An analysis is performed on all equipment leases to
determine whether they should be classified as a capital or operating lease according to SFAS No.
13, as amended.
Share Based Compensation. The Company estimates the grant-date fair value of stock options
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used in the option
pricing model as of June 30, 2009 are: i) zero dividend yield, ii) expected volatility of 59.6%,
iii) risk free interest rate of 3.7% and iv) expected life of 6.3 years. For restricted stock
awards, the fair value of the awards is calculated as the difference between the market value of
the Companys Class A common stock on the date of grant and the purchase price paid by the
employee. The Companys awards are generally subject to graded vesting schedules. Compensation
expense is adjusted for estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award. Forfeiture assumptions are evaluated on a quarterly basis
and updated as necessary.
Certain Information Concerning Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently invest in any off-balance sheet vehicles that provide liquidity, capital
resources, market or credit risk support, or engage in any leasing activities that expose us to any
liability that is not reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our capital markets services revenue has historically been seasonal, which can affect an
investors ability to compare our financial condition and results of operation on a
quarter-by-quarter basis. This seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and
cash flows from operating activities to be lower in the first six months of the year and higher in
the second half of the year. The typical concentration of earnings and cash flows in the last six
months of the year is due to an industry-wide focus of clients to complete transactions towards the
end of the calendar year. The current disruptions in the global and domestic capital markets, the
liquidity issues facing all capital markets, especially the U.S. commercial real estate markets, as
well as the U.S. and global recession will cause historical comparisons to be even more difficult
to gauge, and this pattern of revenue may not continue and has not occurred over the past two
years.
Effect of Inflation and/or Deflation
Inflation and/or deflation, especially inflation, could significantly affect our compensation
costs, particularly those not directly tied to our transaction professionals compensation, due to
factors such as increased costs of capital. The rise of inflation could also significantly and
adversely affect certain expenses, such as debt service costs, information technology and occupancy
costs. To the extent that inflation results in rising interest rates and has other effects upon the
commercial real estate markets in which we operate and, to a lesser extent, the securities markets,
it may affect our financial position and results of operations by reducing the demand for
commercial real estate and related services which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition. See Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(FSP FAS 167) which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the
enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. FSP FAS 167 is effective for fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The
adoption of FSP FAS 166 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company. Prior to
adoption, the Company will evaluate the impact on its consolidated financial position and results
of operations.
35
In
June 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (FSP FAS 166) which removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity from FSP FAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 and removes the
exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, to qualifying special-purpose entities. FSP FAS 166 is effective for
fiscal periods ending after November 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 166 is not expected to have
a material impact on the Company.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume
and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability has Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions that are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4) which supersedes FSP SFAS 157-3, Determining the
Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the Market for that Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS 157-3) and
amends SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) to provide additional guidance on estimating
fair value when the volume and level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to
normal market activity for the asset or liability. FSP FAS 157-4 also provides additional guidance
on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 was effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4
had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures About
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1) which extends the disclosure requirements of
FAS 107 Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to interim financial statements.
FSP FAS No. 107-1 was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures about
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FSP FAS No. 140-4) which
amends FAS 140 Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities and FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FSP FAS 140-4 requires
extensive additional disclosures by public entities with continuing involvement in transfers of
financial assets to special-purpose entities and with variable interest entities. FSP FAS 140-4
was effective for fiscal periods ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 did
not have a material impact on the Company.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP FAS 142-3) which amended the factors to be considered in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
FASB Statement No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 was effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 14, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The
Company adopted the provision of this standard on January 1, 2009, which did not have a material
impact on the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 changes the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be characterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation method significantly changes the
accounting for transactions with minority interest holders. The Company adopted the provisions of
this standard on January 1, 2009, which resulted in a significant change to total equity, as the
noncontrolling interest had been previously classified outside of equity.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP FAS 157-2) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities including, but not limited to,
nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination that
are not subsequently remeasured at fair value and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value in the SFAS 142 goodwill impairment test.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Due to the nature of our business and the manner in which we conduct our operations, in
particular that our financial instruments which are exposed to concentrations of credit risk
consist primarily of short-term cash deposits and investments and in light of the recent support provided by the U.S. government
related to the current credit and liquidity issues, we believe we do not face any material interest
rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, equity price risk or other market risk. The recent
disruptions in the credit markets, however, have, in some cases, resulted in an inability to access
assets such as money market funds that traditionally
36
have been viewed as highly liquid. Although we believe that our cash and cash equivalents are
deposited, invested or placed with secure financial institutions, there is no assurance that these
financial institutions will not default on their obligations to us, especially given current credit
market conditions, which would adversely impact our cash and cash equivalent positions and, in
turn, our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Quarterly Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, respectively) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of June 30, 2009, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules and
forms.
The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure
controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective
disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three month period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are party to various litigation matters, in most cases involving normal ordinary course and
routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and
financial liability with respect to such pending matters. However, we believe, based on our
examination of such pending matters, that our ultimate liability for such matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
37
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 28, 2009. The holders of
35,695,729 shares of the Companys common stock (approximately 97% of the outstanding shares) were
present at the meeting in person or by proxy. The only matters voted upon at the meeting were: (i)
the election of two persons to serve as Class III directors for a three-year term expiring at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012; and (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm to audit and report upon the financial
statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The results of voting were
as follows:
Lenore M. Sullivan and John P. Fowler, the nominees of the Companys Board of Directors, were
elected to serve as Class III directors until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2012. There
were no other nominees.
Shares were voted as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withhold Vote |
|
Name |
|
For |
|
|
For |
|
Lenore M. Sullivan |
|
|
35,511,575 |
|
|
|
184,154 |
|
John P. Fowler |
|
|
35,402,799 |
|
|
|
292,930 |
|
The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the
2009 fiscal year was ratified: affirmative votes, 35,548,179; negative votes, 142,372; withheld
votes, 5,178.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
A. Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Waiver Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2009, among Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., the
lenders party to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent. |
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HFF, INC.
|
|
Dated: August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ John H. Pelusi, Jr.
|
|
|
|
John H. Pelusi, Jr |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
Director and Executive Managing Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Gregory R. Conley
|
|
|
|
Gregory R. Conley |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Waiver Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2009, among Holliday Fenoglio Fowler, L.P., the
lenders party to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent. |
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith). |
40