e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
of
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
A Delaware Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 58-2588724
SEC File Number 000-31254
3871 Lakefield Drive
Suwanee, GA 30024
(678) 473-2000
ARRIS Group, Inc. (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
ARRIS Group, Inc. is a large accelerated filer and is not a shell company. ARRIS Group, Inc. is
not required to file Interactive Data Files.
As of October 31, 2009, 125,366,526 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
INDEX
ii
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
461,795 |
|
|
$ |
409,894 |
|
Short-term investments, at fair value |
|
|
99,917 |
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments |
|
|
561,712 |
|
|
|
427,265 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
4,473 |
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $3,809 in 2009 and $3,988 in 2008) |
|
|
119,125 |
|
|
|
159,443 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
4,749 |
|
Inventories (net of reserves of $20,281 in 2009 and $18,811 in
2008) |
|
|
100,024 |
|
|
|
129,752 |
|
Prepaids |
|
|
10,764 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
Current deferred income tax assets |
|
|
32,883 |
|
|
|
44,004 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
17,193 |
|
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
848,409 |
|
|
|
798,672 |
|
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated
depreciation of $102,302 in 2009 and $100,313 in 2008) |
|
|
58,339 |
|
|
|
59,204 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
234,416 |
|
|
|
231,684 |
|
Intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $181,169 in
2009 and $153,362 in 2008) |
|
|
201,351 |
|
|
|
227,348 |
|
Investments |
|
|
30,574 |
|
|
|
14,681 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,648 |
|
|
|
6,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,384,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,350,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
42,659 |
|
|
$ |
75,863 |
|
Accrued compensation, benefits and related taxes |
|
|
27,054 |
|
|
|
27,024 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
5,292 |
|
|
|
5,652 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
35,423 |
|
|
|
44,461 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
35,229 |
|
|
|
26,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
145,805 |
|
|
|
179,615 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
208,433 |
|
|
|
211,870 |
|
Accrued pension |
|
|
18,914 |
|
|
|
18,820 |
|
Noncurrent income taxes payable |
|
|
10,632 |
|
|
|
9,607 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
35,188 |
|
|
|
41,598 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
15,301 |
|
|
|
15,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
434,273 |
|
|
|
476,853 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 5.0 million
shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 320.0 million shares
authorized; 125.4 million and 123.1 million shares issued
and outstanding in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,177,958 |
|
|
|
1,159,097 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 13 million shares in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
(75,960 |
) |
|
|
(75,960 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(145,012 |
) |
|
|
(202,502 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
Unfunded pension losses |
|
|
(8,070 |
) |
|
|
(8,070 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
950,057 |
|
|
|
873,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,384,330 |
|
|
$ |
1,350,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
1
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data and percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
275,772 |
|
|
$ |
297,551 |
|
|
$ |
807,811 |
|
|
$ |
852,167 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
160,299 |
|
|
|
191,417 |
|
|
|
479,548 |
|
|
|
567,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
115,473 |
|
|
|
106,134 |
|
|
|
328,263 |
|
|
|
284,266 |
|
Gross margin % |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
36,311 |
|
|
|
33,012 |
|
|
|
110,782 |
|
|
|
107,040 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
30,909 |
|
|
|
27,473 |
|
|
|
89,447 |
|
|
|
83,257 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
34,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
76,574 |
|
|
|
69,833 |
|
|
|
228,821 |
|
|
|
225,933 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
38,899 |
|
|
|
36,301 |
|
|
|
99,442 |
|
|
|
58,333 |
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
13,121 |
|
|
|
12,672 |
|
Loss (gain) on investments |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
210 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
(5,891 |
) |
Loss (gain) on foreign currency |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
Gain on debt retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
34,354 |
|
|
|
33,098 |
|
|
|
89,343 |
|
|
|
51,643 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,655 |
|
|
|
10,664 |
|
|
|
31,853 |
|
|
|
17,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,699 |
|
|
$ |
22,434 |
|
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
125,326 |
|
|
|
122,922 |
|
|
|
124,381 |
|
|
|
125,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
129,695 |
|
|
|
125,420 |
|
|
|
127,916 |
|
|
|
127,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
15,370 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
34,854 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
8,286 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
13,678 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
Amortization of deferred finance fees |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Loss (gain) on investments |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
210 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
7,972 |
|
Gain on debt retirement |
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions and
dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
40,801 |
|
|
|
(12,103 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
(4,001 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
30,449 |
|
|
|
(6,028 |
) |
Income taxes payable/recoverable |
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
|
|
(657 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(32,620 |
) |
|
|
9,743 |
|
Prepaids and other, net |
|
|
6,665 |
|
|
|
(5,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
171,204 |
|
|
|
86,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(14,327 |
) |
|
|
(16,444 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(8,130 |
) |
|
|
(10,066 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(151,845 |
) |
|
|
(86,998 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
54,416 |
|
|
|
122,486 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(119,678 |
) |
|
|
9,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(10,677 |
) |
|
|
(35,518 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,960 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Employer repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax withholdings |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
11,205 |
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(113,570 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
51,901 |
|
|
|
(17,810 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
409,894 |
|
|
|
323,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
461,795 |
|
|
$ |
305,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
ARRIS Group, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, except as the context otherwise
indicates, ARRIS or the Company), is an international communications technology company,
headquartered in Suwanee, Georgia. ARRIS operates in three business segments, Broadband
Communications Systems, Access, Transport & Supplies, and Media & Communications Systems,
specializing in integrated broadband network solutions that include products, systems and software
for content and operations management (including video on demand, or VOD), and professional
services. ARRIS is a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of telephony, data, video,
construction, rebuild and maintenance equipment for the broadband communications industry. In
addition, ARRIS is a leading supplier of infrastructure products used by cable system operators to
build-out and maintain hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) networks. The Company provides its customers
with products and services that enable reliable, high-speed, two-way broadband transmission of
video, telephony, and data.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the
consolidated financial statements for the periods shown. Interim results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected from a twelve-month period. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys most recently audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
Note 2. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) amended the guidance for
revenue recognition in multiple-element arrangements. It has been amended to remove from the scope
of industry specific revenue accounting guidance for software and software related transactions,
tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together
to deliver the products essential functionality. The guidance now requires an entity to provide
updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement
should be separated, and the consideration allocated; and allocate revenue in an arrangement using
estimated selling prices of deliverables for these products if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective
evidence (VSOE) or third-party evidence of selling price. The guidance also eliminates the use
of the residual method and requires an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price
method for these products. The accounting changes summarized are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. Adoption may either be on a prospective basis or by
retrospective application. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these amendments on
its accounting and reporting systems and processes; however, at this time the Company is unable to
quantify the impact on its financial statements of its adoption or determine the timing and method
of its adoption.
In May 2008, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may
be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance requires that the liability and equity components
of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash
settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible
debt borrowing rate. The resulting debt discount is accreted over the period the convertible debt
is expected to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. Retrospective application
to all periods presented is required except for instruments that were not outstanding during any of
the periods that will be presented in the annual financial statements for the period of adoption
but were outstanding during an earlier period. The adoption of the guidance on January 1, 2009
affected the accounting treatment of the Companys 2% convertible senior subordinated notes due
2026, which were issued on November 6, 2006. Upon adoption, the Company recorded an adjustment to
increase additional paid-in capital as of the November 6, 2006 issuance date by approximately $87.3
million. The Company is accreting the resulting debt discount to interest expense over the
estimated seven year life of the convertible notes, which represents the first redemption date of
November 15, 2013 when the Company may redeem the notes at its election or the note holders may
require their redemption. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment of approximately $23.0 million
to retained earnings that represents the debt discount accretion during the years ending December
31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and will recognize additional non-cash interest expense of $11.1 million,
$11.9 million, $12.9 million, $13.9 million and $11.2 million during the years ending December 31,
2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, for accretion of the debt discount, to the extent
that the convertible notes remain outstanding. The Company reduced income from continuing
operations and net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 by $2.8 million
and $8.3 million and reduced basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 per share and $0.06 per
share, respectively.
4
The following tables present the effect on the Companys affected financial statement line items
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands,
except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally |
|
As |
|
Increase |
|
Originally |
|
As |
|
Increase |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjusted |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Reported |
|
Adjusted |
|
(Decrease) |
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,738 |
|
|
$ |
4,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
$ |
4,964 |
|
|
$ |
12,672 |
|
|
$ |
7,708 |
|
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
|
|
35,720 |
|
|
|
33,098 |
|
|
|
(2,622 |
) |
|
|
59,351 |
|
|
|
51,643 |
|
|
|
(7,708 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
11,645 |
|
|
|
10,664 |
|
|
|
(981 |
) |
|
|
20,434 |
|
|
|
17,551 |
|
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
24,075 |
|
|
|
22,434 |
|
|
|
(1,641 |
) |
|
|
38,917 |
|
|
|
34,092 |
|
|
|
(4,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
As Originally |
|
As |
|
Increase |
|
|
Reported |
|
Adjusted |
|
(Decrease) |
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
11,514 |
|
|
$ |
12,157 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
6,576 |
|
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
276,137 |
|
|
|
211,870 |
|
|
|
(64,267 |
) |
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities |
|
|
17,565 |
|
|
|
41,598 |
|
|
|
24,033 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,105,998 |
|
|
|
1,159,097 |
|
|
|
53,099 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(188,562 |
) |
|
|
(202,502 |
) |
|
|
(13,940 |
) |
Note 3. Investments
ARRIS investments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
94,963 |
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified as current assets |
|
|
99,917 |
|
|
|
17,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,908 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
26,574 |
|
|
|
5,773 |
|
Cost method investments |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified as noncurrent assets |
|
|
30,574 |
|
|
|
14,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
126,491 |
|
|
$ |
32,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRIS investments in debt and marketable equity securities are categorized as trading or
available-for-sale. The Company currently does not hold any held-to-maturity securities. Realized
and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities and realized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are included in our consolidated balance sheet as a component of
accumulate other comprehensive income (loss). The unrealized losses in total and by individual
5
investment as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were not material. The amortized cost
basis of the Companys investments approximates fair value.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, ARRIS cost method investment is an investment in a
private company, which is recorded at cost of $4.0 million. Each quarter ARRIS evaluates its
investment for any other-than-temporary impairment, by reviewing the current revenues, bookings and
long-term plan of the private company. In the third quarter of 2009, the private company raised
additional financing at the same price and terms that ARRIS had invested. As of September 30,
2009, ARRIS believes there has been no other-than-temporary impairment but will continue to
evaluate the investment for impairment. Due to the fact the investment is in a private company,
ARRIS is exempt from estimating the fair value on an interim basis. However, ARRIS is required to
estimate the fair value if there has been an identifiable event or change in circumstance that may
have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
Classification of available-for-sales securities as current or non-current is dependent upon
managements intended holding period, the securitys maturity date and liquidity consideration
based on market conditions. If management intends to hold the securities for longer than one year
as of the balance sheet date, they are classified as non-current.
Note 4. Fair Value Measurements
The fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order
to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy was
established that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into
three broad levels, which are described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level
1 inputs.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair
value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
The following table presents the Companys investment assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Current investments |
|
$ |
90,243 |
|
|
$ |
4,720 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
94,963 |
|
Noncurrent investments |
|
|
20,366 |
|
|
|
6,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,574 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,954 |
|
|
|
4,954 |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
110,773 |
|
|
$ |
10,928 |
|
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
$ |
126,655 |
|
|
|
|
The majority of the Companys short-term investments and long-term investments instruments are
classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using quoted
market prices, market prices for similar securities, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable
levels of price transparency. The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in
active markets include the Companys investment in money market funds, U.S. government notes and
bills and mutual funds. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy. The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include the Companys
variable rate demand notes, cash surrender value of company owned life insurance, corporate
obligations and certificates of deposit. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy. See Note 3 for further information on the Companys investments.
6
The table below includes a roll-forward of the Companys auction rate securities that have been
classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Estimated fair value January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,909 |
|
First quarter 2009 change in fair value |
|
|
15 |
|
Second quarter 2009 change in fair value |
|
|
15 |
|
Third quarter 2009 change in fair value |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
ARRIS had $5.0 million invested in a single issue of an auction rate security at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, there was no active market for this auction rate
security or comparable securities due to current market conditions. Therefore, until such a market
becomes active, the auction rate security is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Due to the current market conditions and the failure of the security to reprice, beginning in the
second quarter of 2008, the Company has recorded changes in the fair value of the instrument as an
impairment charge in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the loss (gain) on investments
line. The security was held as of September 30, 2009 as a short-term investment, classified as a
trading security, with a fair market value of $5.0 million, which includes the fair value of the
put option described below. The Company may not be able to liquidate this security until a
successful auction occurs, or, alternatively, beginning June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012, when
the Company has the option to sell the security to a major financial institution. This security is
a single student loan issue rated AAA and is substantially guaranteed by the federal government.
ARRIS will continue to evaluate the fair value of its investment in this auction rate security for
any further impairment.
All of the Companys foreign currency contracts are over-the-counter instruments. There is an
active market for these instruments, and therefore, they are classified as Level 1 in the fair
value hierarchy. ARRIS does not enter into currency contracts for trading purposes. The Company
has a master netting agreement with the primary counterparty to the derivative instruments. This
agreement allows for the net settlement of assets and liabilities arising from different
transactions with the same counterparty.
Note 5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
ARRIS has certain international customers who are billed in their local currency. Changes in the
monetary exchange rates may adversely affect the Companys results of operations and financial
condition. When appropriate, ARRIS enters into various derivative transactions to enhance its
ability to manage the volatility relating to these typical business exposures. The Company does not
hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. The Companys
derivative instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The
Companys derivative instruments are not designated as hedges, and accordingly, all changes in the
fair value of the instruments are recognized as a loss (gain) on foreign currency in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The maximum time frame for ARRIS derivatives is 12 months.
As of January 1, 2009, derivative instruments which are subject to master netting arrangements are
not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The fair values of ARRIS derivative instruments recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Fair Value |
Derivatives Not
Designated as Hedging
Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
Prior to January 1, 2009, the Company recorded its derivative instruments on a net basis on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the fair value of the instruments was
recorded as a net asset of $391 thousand, comprised of an asset of $1,094 thousand offset with a
liability of $703 thousand.
7
The change in the fair values of ARRIS derivative instruments recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
Statement of Operations Location |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Derivatives Not
Designated as Hedging
Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Loss (gain) on foreign currency |
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
|
$(2,057) |
|
$ |
3,099 |
|
|
$ |
(1,096 |
) |
Note 6. Pension Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Pension Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
Expected gain on plan assets |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer Contributions
No minimum funding contributions are required in 2009 under the Companys defined benefit plan.
However, the Company made voluntary contributions to the plan of approximately $1.5 million and
$2.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company made voluntary contributions to the
plan of approximately $1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Note 7. Guarantees
Warranty
ARRIS provides warranties of various lengths to customers based on the specific product and the
terms of individual agreements. The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties
based on historical trends, the embedded base of product in the field, failure rates, and repair
costs at the time revenue is recognized. Expenses related to product defects and unusual product
warranty problems are recorded in the period that the problem is identified. While the Company
engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and
evaluating the quality of its suppliers, the estimated warranty obligation could be affected by
changes in ongoing product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in
correcting a product failure, as well as specific product failures outside of ARRIS baseline
experience. If actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from
estimates, revisions (which could be material) would be recorded to the warranty liability. ARRIS
evaluates its warranty obligations on an individual product basis.
The Company offers extended warranties and support service agreements on certain products. Revenue
from these agreements is deferred at the time of the sale and recognized on a straight-line basis
over the contract period. Costs of services performed under these types of contracts are charged
to expense as incurred, which approximates the timing of the revenue stream.
8
Information regarding the changes in ARRIS aggregate product warranty liabilities (including
short-term and long-term) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10,184 |
|
Accruals related to warranties (including changes in
estimates) |
|
|
4,588 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) |
|
|
(5,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
9,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Business Acquisitions
Acquisition of EG Technology, Inc.
On September 1, 2009, ARRIS acquired certain assets and liabilities of EG Technology, Inc. (EGT)
for $6.5 million. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination. ARRIS acquired
EGT patents and video processing technology for digital networks which complements ARRIS video
offerings by adding multi-functional, flexible, and scalable video processors to its portfolio of
market leading voice, video and data solutions. The goodwill and intangible assets recorded as a
result of this acquisition are in the Broadband Communications System (BCS) segment.
Acquisition of Auspice Corporation
On August 12, 2008, ARRIS acquired certain assets of Auspice Corporation (Auspice) for $5.0
million. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The Company completed this
transaction to enhance its offerings for Service Assurance software and to gain market share in the
industry.
Cash Paid For Acquisitions
Below is information regarding the cash paid for acquisitions in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows:
2009 Cash Paid for Acquisitions:
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company acquired certain assets of EG Technology, Inc. for $6.5 million. In exchange, ARRIS acquired tangible assets of $1.6 million, intangible assets (including goodwill) of $5.6 million, and assumed liabilities of $0.7 million.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company paid a deposit of $1.5 million for Digeo, Inc. The remaining cash was paid upon closing of the transaction on October 1, 2009, and the final purchase price allocation will be included in the three months ending December 31, 2009.
During the first quarter of 2009, ARRIS paid $0.2 million for transaction costs related to the 2007 C-COR acquisition that had been accrued as of December 31, 2008.
2008 Cash Paid for Acquisitions:
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company paid transaction fees of $5.0 million in 2008 which resulted in an adjustment to the purchase price allocation and increased goodwill by the same amount.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company acquired certain assets of Auspice Corporation for $5.0 million and paid related transaction fees of $48 thousand. In exchange, ARRIS acquired tangible assets of $0.5 million, intangible assets (including goodwill) of $4.7 million, and assumed liabilities of $0.1 million.
9
Note 9. Restructuring
During the first quarter of 2004, ARRIS consolidated two facilities in Georgia, giving the Company
the ability to house many of its core technology, marketing, and corporate headquarters functions
in a single building. This consolidation resulted in a restructuring charge of approximately $6.2
million in 2004 related to lease commitments and the write-off of leasehold improvements and other
fixed assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
545 |
|
Q1 2009 payments |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
Q1 2009 adjustments to accrual |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
Q2 2009 payments |
|
|
( 192 |
) |
|
|
Q2 2009 adjustments to accrual |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
Q3 2009 payments |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company initiated a restructuring plan related to its
acquisition of C-COR, Incorporated (C-COR). ARRIS acquired remaining restructuring accruals of
approximately $658 thousand representing C-COR contractual obligations that related to excess
leased facilities. These payments will be paid over their remaining lease terms through 2014,
unless terminated earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
|
Q1 2009 payments |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
Q1 2009 adjustments to accrual |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
Q2 2009 payments |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
Q2 2009 adjustments to accrual |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
Q3 2009 payments |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
Q3 2009 adjustments to accrual |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2009, ARRIS consolidated two facilities in Colorado. The
consolidation allows the Company to combine its sales force and create a unified presence in the
Denver area business community. This consolidation resulted in a restructuring charge of
approximately $212 thousand in 2009 related to lease commitments and the write-off of leasehold
improvements and other fixed assets. ARRIS expects the remaining payments to be made by the second
quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance as of May 2009 |
|
$ |
212 |
|
Q2 2009 payments |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Q3 2009 payments |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost, approximating first-in, first-out, or market.
The components of inventory were as follows, net of reserves (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw material |
|
$ |
17,939 |
|
|
$ |
19,247 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
78,224 |
|
|
|
105,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net inventories |
|
$ |
100,024 |
|
|
$ |
129,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Note 11. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
|
$ |
2,612 |
|
Building and leasehold improvements |
|
|
22,271 |
|
|
|
20,048 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
135,758 |
|
|
|
136,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,641 |
|
|
|
159,517 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(102,302 |
) |
|
|
(100,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
58,339 |
|
|
$ |
59,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Long-Term Obligations
Debt, capital lease obligations and other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2.00% convertible senior notes due 2026 (net of discount of $52,630 in 2009 and
$64,267 in 2008) |
|
$ |
208,420 |
|
|
$ |
211,733 |
|
2.00% Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority debt, net of current portion |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
208,433 |
|
|
|
211,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
$ |
5,580 |
|
|
$ |
4,896 |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
Landlord funded leasehold improvements |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
15,301 |
|
|
$ |
15,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 6, 2006, the Company issued $276.0 million of 2% convertible senior notes due
2026. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, based on an initial conversion rate,
subject to adjustment, of 62.1504 shares per $1,000 base amount (which represents an initial
conversion price of approximately $16.09 per share of our common stock), into cash up to the
principal amount and, if applicable, shares of the Companys common stock, cash or a combination
thereof. The notes may be converted during any calendar quarter in which the closing price of
ARRIS common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending
on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds 120% of the
conversion price in effect at that time (which, based on the current conversion price would be
$19.31) and upon the occurrence of certain other events. Upon conversion, the holder will receive
the principal amount in cash and an additional payment, in either cash or stock at the option of
the Company. The additional payment will be based on a formula which calculates the difference
between the initial conversion rate ($16.09) and the market price at the date of the conversion.
As of November 6, 2009, the notes could not be converted by the holders thereof. Interest is
payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The Company may redeem the notes at any time on or
after November 15, 2013, subject to certain conditions. In addition, the holders may require the
Company to purchase all or a portion of their convertible notes on or after November 13, 2013.
The Company paid approximately $7.8 million of finance fees related to the issuance of the notes.
Of the $7.8 million, $2.5 million were attributed to the equity component of the convertible debt
instrument. The portion related to the debt issuance costs are being amortized over seven years.
The remaining balance of unamortized financing costs from these notes as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 was $3.0 million, and $3.7 million, respectively. See Note 2 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the notes.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the face value of the outstanding notes was $261.0
million and $276.0 million, respectively. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company acquired
$15.0 million face value of the notes for approximately $10.6 million. The Company also wrote off
approximately $0.2 million of deferred finance fees associated with the portion of the notes
acquired. As a result, the Company realized a gain of approximately $4.2 million on the retirement
of the notes.
The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock since its inception.
11
Note 13. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income represents the net change in stockholders equity during a period from
sources other than transactions with stockholders. For ARRIS, the components of comprehensive
income include the unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities. The components of
comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follow
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income |
|
$ |
21,699 |
|
|
$ |
22,434 |
|
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
Changes in the following equity accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss)/gain on marketable
securities |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
21,800 |
|
|
$ |
22,239 |
|
|
$ |
57,704 |
|
|
$ |
33,943 |
|
|
|
|
Note 14. Segment Information
The management approach has been followed in order to present our segment information. This
approach is based upon the way the management of the Company organizes segments within an
enterprise for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Financial information is
reported on the basis that it is used internally by the chief operating decision maker for
evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments.
The Company manages its business under three segments: Broadband Communications Systems (BCS),
Access, Transport & Supplies (ATS), and Media & Communications Systems (MCS). A detailed
description of each segment is contained in our December 31, 2008 Form 10-K under Item 1 in Our
Principal Products.
The Broadband Communications Systems segments product solutions include Headend and Subscriber
Premises equipment that enable cable operators to provide Voice over IP, Video over IP and
high-speed data services to residential and business subscribers.
The Access, Transport & Supplies segments product lines cover all components of a hybrid
fiber coax network, radio frequency over glass (RFoG) networks and ethernet passive optical
networks (EPON) including managed and scalable headend and hub equipment, optical nodes, radio
frequency products, transport products and supplies.
The Media & Communications Systems segment provides content and operations management systems,
including products for Video on Demand, Ad Insertion, Digital Advertising, Service Assurance,
Service Fulfillment, Mobile Workforce Management and Fixed/Mobile converged communications.
12
The table below presents the information about the Companys reporting segments for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
ATS |
|
MCS |
|
Total |
Three Months Ended September 30,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
211,288 |
|
|
$ |
45,488 |
|
|
$ |
18,996 |
|
|
$ |
275,772 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
94,317 |
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
10,506 |
|
|
|
115,473 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
217,729 |
|
|
$ |
62,100 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
297,551 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
79,278 |
|
|
|
16,624 |
|
|
|
10,232 |
|
|
|
106,134 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,654 |
|
|
|
3,492 |
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
617,188 |
|
|
$ |
131,946 |
|
|
$ |
58,677 |
|
|
$ |
807,811 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
265,952 |
|
|
|
29,733 |
|
|
|
32,578 |
|
|
|
328,263 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16,962 |
|
|
|
10,827 |
|
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
597,777 |
|
|
$ |
211,961 |
|
|
$ |
42,429 |
|
|
$ |
852,167 |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
198,756 |
|
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
23,140 |
|
|
|
284,266 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
15,736 |
|
|
|
34,854 |
|
The following table summarizes the Companys net intangible assets and goodwill by reportable
segment as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
ATS |
|
MCS |
|
Total |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
154,314 |
|
|
$ |
37,738 |
|
|
$ |
42,364 |
|
|
$ |
234,416 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
121,422 |
|
|
|
78,137 |
|
|
|
201,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
150,569 |
|
|
$ |
38,366 |
|
|
$ |
42,749 |
|
|
$ |
231,684 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,384 |
|
|
|
88,964 |
|
|
|
227,348 |
|
Note 15. Sales Information
The Company had two customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) with sales of more than
10% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Over the past year, certain
customers beneficial ownership may have changed as a result of mergers and acquisitions.
Therefore, the revenue for ARRIS customers for prior periods has been adjusted to include the
affiliates under current common control. A summary of sales to these customers for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Comcast |
|
$ |
101,975 |
|
|
$ |
100,920 |
|
|
$ |
263,843 |
|
|
$ |
181,872 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Warner Cable |
|
$ |
45,992 |
|
|
$ |
43,862 |
|
|
$ |
147,959 |
|
|
$ |
190,081 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
13
No other customer provided more than 10% of total sales for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 or 2008.
ARRIS sells its products primarily in United States. The Companys international revenue is
generated from Asia Pacific, Europe, Latin America and Canada. The Asia Pacific market primarily
includes China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. The European market primarily
includes Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain and
Switzerland. The Latin American market primarily includes Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Columbia,
Mexico, and Puerto Rico. Sales to international customers were approximately $79.0 million, or
28.7% of total sales, for the three months ended September 30, 2009. International sales during
the same period in 2008 were $77.5 million, or 26.0% of total sales. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 sales to international customers were $220.2 million and $249.2
million, or 27.3% and 29.2%, respectively.
Note 16. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS) computations for the periods indicated (in thousands except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,699 |
|
|
$ |
22,434 |
|
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
125,326 |
|
|
|
122,922 |
|
|
|
124,381 |
|
|
|
125,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21,699 |
|
|
$ |
22,434 |
|
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
125,326 |
|
|
|
122,922 |
|
|
|
124,381 |
|
|
|
125,466 |
|
Net effect of dilutive equity
awards |
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
129,695 |
|
|
|
125,420 |
|
|
|
127,916 |
|
|
|
127,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2006, the Company issued $276.0 million of convertible senior notes. Upon conversion,
ARRIS will satisfy at least the principal amount in cash, rather than common stock. This reduced
the potential earnings dilution to only include the conversion premium, which is the difference
between the conversion price per share of common stock and the average share price. The average
share price for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was less than the
conversion price of $16.09 and, consequently, did not result in dilution.
Excluded from the dilutive securities described above are employee stock options to acquire
approximately 2.1 million shares and 3.3 million shares, for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. During the same periods in 2008, approximately 6.1 million
shares and 7.1 million shares, respectively, were excluded from the dilutive securities above.
These exclusions were made because, as a result of the exercise price of such securities, they were
antidilutive.
14
Note 17. Income Taxes
In the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded income tax expense of $31.9 million
and $17.6 million, respectively. Below is a summary of the components of the tax expense in each
period (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Before |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Tax Rate |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Tax Rate |
|
Non-Discrete Items |
|
$ |
85,191 |
|
|
$ |
29,016 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
$ |
51,643 |
|
|
$ |
19,081 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
% |
Discrete Accounting Events |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discrete Tax Events -
Valuation Allowances /
Uncertain tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
89,343 |
|
|
$ |
31,853 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
$ |
51,643 |
|
|
$ |
17,551 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company reported a discrete income tax benefit of $0.1
million arising predominately from U.S. Federal return-to-provision adjustments for the
2008 corporate income tax return. In the second quarter of 2009, there was no tax or
accounting discrete event. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company reported a discrete
accounting gain of $4.2 million on the repurchase of convertible debt. Income tax expense
of $1.4 million was recorded on the gain, reflecting a tax rate of 33.3%. Additionally,
during the first quarter, the Company identified $1.5 million of discrete income tax
expense relating primarily to adjustments of valuation allowances. |
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2008, the Company reported $1.5 million of discrete income tax
benefit, mostly attributable to U.S. Federal return-to-provision adjustments for the 2007
corporate income tax return. There was no discrete accounting event during the first nine
months of 2008. |
The Company anticipates that the effective tax rate for full year 2009 for non-discrete items will
be in the range of 33% 35%.
Note 18. Contingencies
From time to time, ARRIS is involved in claims, disputes, litigation or legal proceedings
incidental to the ordinary course of its business, such as intellectual property disputes,
contractual disputes, employment matters and environmental proceedings. Except as described below,
ARRIS is not party to any proceedings that are, or reasonably could be expected to be, material to
its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Commencing in 2005, Rembrandt Technologies, LP filed a series of lawsuits against several MSOs
alleging infringement of eight patents related to the cable systems operators use of data
transmission, video, cable modem, voice-over-internet, and other technologies and applications. On
July 14, 2009 ARRIS reached a settlement with Rembrandt.
In 2007, Adelphia Recovery Trust (Trust) contacted ARRIS asserting that ARRIS may have received
transfers from Adelphia Cablevision, LLC (Cablevision) during the year prior to its filing of a
Chapter 11 petition on September 25, 2002 (the Petition Date), and that said transfers may be
voidable. Cablevision sent similar letters to other parties. In the event a suit is commenced,
ARRIS intends to contest the case vigorously. To date, ARRIS has received no further communication
from Cablevision. No estimate can be made of the possible range of loss, if any, associated with a
resolution of these assertions.
In January and February 2008, Verizon Services Corp. filed separate lawsuits against Cox and
Charter alleging infringement of eight patents. In the Verizon v. Cox suit, the jury issued a
verdict in favor of Cox, finding non-infringement in all patents and invalidating two of Verizons
patents. Verizon has filed a notice of appeal. The Charter suit is still pending, with trial
anticipated for 2010. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome of the
Charter case or Cox appeal; though the Cox outcome at trial increases the likelihood of a favorable
Charter outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify Charter
and Cox, pay royalties and/or cease utilizing certain technology.
15
Acacia Media Technologies Corp. sued Charter and Time Warner Cable, Inc. for allegedly infringing
several U.S. Patents. The case has been bifurcated, where the case for invalidity of the patents
will be tried first, and only if one or more patents are found to be valid, then the case for
infringement will be tried. Both customers requested C-CORs, as well as other vendors, support
under the indemnity provisions of the purchase agreements (related to video-on-demand products). It
is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable
outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the defendants, pay royalties and/or cease using
certain technology.
V-Tran Media Technologies has filed a number of patent infringement lawsuits against 21 different
parties, including suits against Comcast, Charter, Verizon, Time Warner and numerous smaller MSOs,
for the alleged infringement of two patents related to a television broadcast system for selective
transmission of viewer chosen programs at viewer requested times. Both patents expired in June
2008. The defendants recently received a favorable Markman Ruling and are seeking dismissal of the
suit. C-COR manufactured products that allegedly infringed on the patents. It is premature to
assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be
required to indemnify the defendants or pay royalties. Since the patents have expired, it is
unlikely ARRIS will be prohibited from using the technology.
In February 2008, several former employees of a former subsidiary of C-COR, filed a class action
Fair Labor Standards Act suit against the former subsidiary and C-COR alleging that the plaintiffs
were not properly paid for overtime. The proposed class could have included 1,000 cable installers
and field technicians. ARRIS is actively contesting the suit. The opt-in period for substantially
all of the plaintiffs ended July 31, 2009. To date, approximately 280 people have opted-in relative
to C-COR. The parties engaged in an attempted mediation of the dispute and such communications
continue. If the mediation is not successful ARRIS intends to vigorously defend this case.
On March 11, 2009, ARRIS filed a declaratory judgment action against British Telecom (BT) seeking
to invalidate the BT patents and seeking a declaration that neither the ARRIS products, nor their
use by ARRIS customers infringe any of the BT patents. This action arose from the assertion by BT
(via their agent, IPValue), that the ARRIS products or their use by ARRIS customers infringed four
BT patents.
On July 31, 2009, ARRIS filed a contempt motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Delaware against SeaChange International related to a patent owned by ARRIS. In its motion, ARRIS
is seeking further damages and the enforcement of the permanent injunction entered by the Court
against certain of SeaChange products sold since 2002. The original finding of infringement was
affirmed by the Federal Circuit in 2006, and the patent claims (with one exception) recently were
upheld by the U.S. Patent Office in a re-examination process initiated by SeaChange. In response
to ARRIS Motion for Contempt, on August 3, 2009, SeaChange filed a complaint seeking a declaratory
judgment from the Court to declare that its products are non-infringing with respect to the
patent.
From time to time third parties approach ARRIS or an ARRIS customer, seeking that ARRIS or its
customer consider entering into a license agreement for such patents. Such invitations cause ARRIS
to dedicate time to study such patents and enter into discussions with such third parties regarding
the merits and value, if any, of the patents. These discussions, may materialize into license
agreements or patents asserted against ARRIS or its customers. If asserted against our customers,
our customers may seek indemnification from ARRIS. It is not possible to determine the impact of
any such ongoing discussions on ARRIS business financial conditions.
Note 19. Subsequent Events
On October 1, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the
liabilities of Digeo, Inc. (Digeo). The aggregate purchase price for the transaction is
approximately $20 million, of which an initial payment of approximately $1.5 million was paid in
September of 2009 and approximately $14.5 million in cash at closing. The remaining $4 million is
being deferred until the first anniversary of the closing of the transactions and may be reduced as
a result of any claims for breaches of representations and warranties by Digeo. The Digeo
acquisition, along with the recently completed acquisition of EG Technology, provides the Company
with substantial technical expertise in video networking and an innovative multimedia services
delivery platform.
The Company has disclosed all subsequent events through the time of filing these financial
statements with the SEC.
16
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a global communications technology company specializing in the design and engineering of
broadband network solutions. We are a leading developer, manufacturer and supplier of cable
telephony, video and high-speed data products, as well as outside plant construction and
maintenance equipment for cable system operators. We provide products and equipment principally to
cable system operators and, more specifically, to Multiple System Operators (MSOs). Our products
allow MSOs and other broadband service providers to deliver a full range of integrated voice, video
and high-speed data services to their subscribers. Our core strategy is to lead network operators
through the transition to Internet Protocol-based networks by leveraging our extensive global
installed base of products and experienced workforce to deliver network solutions that meet the
business needs of our customers.
We operate our business in three segments:
|
|
|
Broadband Communications Systems (BCS) |
|
|
|
Access, Transport & Supplies (ATS) |
|
|
|
Media & Communications Systems (MCS) |
A detailed description of each segment is contained in Our Principal Products in our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Our Strategy and Key Highlights
Our long-term business strategy, Convergence Enabled, includes the following key elements:
|
|
|
Maintain a strong capital structure, mindful of our 2013 debt maturity, share
repurchase opportunities and other capital needs including mergers and acquisitions. |
|
|
|
Grow our current business into a more complete portfolio including a strong video
product suite. |
|
|
|
Continue to invest in the evolution toward enabling true network convergence onto an
all IP platform. |
|
|
|
Continue to expand our product/service portfolio through internal developments,
partnerships and acquisitions. |
|
|
|
Expand our international business and begin to consider opportunities in markets other
than cable. |
|
|
|
Continue to invest in and evolve the ARRIS talent pool to implement the above
strategies. |
Our mission is to simplify technology, facilitate its implementation, and enable operators to put
their subscribers in control of their entertainment, information, and communication needs. Through
a set of business solutions that respond to specific market needs, we are integrating our products,
software, and services solutions to work with our customers as they address Internet Protocol
telephony deployment, high speed data deployment, Internet Protocol video deployment, network
capacity issues, on demand video rollout, operations management, network integration, and business
services opportunities.
Below are some key highlights and trends relative to our third quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009:
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted share decreased only slightly (from
$0.18 in the third quarter 2008 to $0.17 in the third quarter 2009),
despite a 7% decline in sales. |
|
|
|
Gross margin percentage increased 6.2 percentage points to 41.9% in the third quarter
2009 as compared to the period in 2008, reflecting a stronger product mix including notably
higher sales of our higher margin CMTS product line. |
|
|
|
We ended the third quarter 2009 with $576.7 million of cash resources which includes
$561.7 of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments and $15.0 million of long-term
U.S. treasury notes that mature in Q4 2010. We generated approximately $63.1 million of
cash from operating activities in the third quarter and $171.2 million during the first
nine months of 2009. |
17
|
|
|
We used $10.6 million of cash in the first quarter of 2009 to retire $15.0 million of
the principal amount of our convertible debt, which represented a 29% discount. The
Company also wrote off approximately $0.2 million of deferred finance fees associated with
the portion of the notes retired. We recorded a pre-tax net gain of $4.2 million in the
first quarter as a result of the retirement. |
|
|
|
We ended the third quarter of 2009 with an order backlog of approximately $169 million
and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.01. Both order backlog and book-to-bill are up moderately
compared to the third quarter of 2008. |
Product Line Highlights
|
|
|
Broadband Communications Systems |
|
|
|
|
Expanded Video Capability |
|
|
|
Through two recent acquisitions ARRIS has expanded its expertise in video processing and
multimedia video delivery systems for delivery of programming from multiple sources to a
variety of consumer devices. The acquired expertise and talent will accelerate the
introduction of next generation IP based consumer video products and services. The two
acquisitions are: |
|
o |
|
The purchase of the assets, including the video processing intellectual
property, of EG Technologies which includes a portfolio of encoding, transcoding
and multiplexing products. |
|
o |
|
On October 1, 2009, the purchase of the assets, including the
intellectual property, of Digeo, Inc. The assets include an extensive patent
portfolio in digital video recording, home networking, e-commerce and multimedia
technologies, as well as the Moxi® line of home video delivery products. |
|
o |
|
Downstream port shipments reached a record level of 33,955 in the third
quarter of 2009, and were 90,476 through the first nine months of 2009. |
|
o |
|
Operators continue to focus on deploying DOCSIS 3.0 technology in order
to increase overall capacity as well as compete aggressively with higher speed
service tiers. The ARRIS solution has been adopted broadly across the industry,
with strong domestic US shipments and increased business internationally in CALA,
Asia, and Europe. |
|
o |
|
Continued improvement in gross margins resulting from both customer and
product mix (increased CMTS shipments). |
|
o |
|
The first in-service deployment of a DOCSIS 3.0 Upstream Channel
Bonding service with JCN in Japan |
|
o |
|
Achieved #1 CMTS world-wide market share for the first time in the
second quarter of 2009. |
|
o |
|
Approximately 1.2 million and 3.6 million EMTAs were shipped in the
third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, which was down 21% and
18% from the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, respectively, a result of
overall VoIP net subscriber additions leveling off. We have retained number one
market share for EMTAs for 17 consecutive quarters. |
|
o |
|
We increased shipments of Multi-line and Wireless Gateways in the third
quarter of 2009. |
|
o |
|
DOCSIS 3.0 CPE shipments increased substantially in third quarter 2009.
We expect a continuing transition from deployment of DOCSIS 2.0 to DOCSIS 3.0 CPE
throughout the remainder of 2009. |
|
|
|
Access, Transport & Supplies |
|
o |
|
Business continues to be impacted by macro economic factors, which
resulted in lower sales year over year with a small sequential gain over the first
quarter of 2009. |
|
o |
|
DOCSIS 3.0 bandwidth efficiency improvements allow for network
investments to be delayed. |
|
o |
|
CORWave multi-wavelength optical transport platforms are continuing to
gain traction with both domestic and international customers. These platforms will
allow operators to multiply network capacity in support of narrowcast services at a
fraction of traditional infrastructure upgrade costs. We expect these platforms to
become more widely adopted as bandwidth demands continue to increase. |
|
|
o |
|
Product mix and lower volumes negatively impacted margins. |
18
|
|
|
Media & Communications Systems |
|
o |
|
Completed WorkAssureTM deployments for several Time Warner Cable regions. |
|
|
o |
|
Demand for Assurance products continue to be strong based on: |
|
§ |
|
DOCSIS 3.0 rollouts |
|
|
§ |
|
A continued focus on Opex management and control |
|
o |
|
Began ConvergeMedia backoffice and server deployments in several US
MSOs including Charter. |
Significant Customers
The vast majority of our sales are to cable system operators worldwide. As the U.S. cable industry
continued a trend toward consolidation, the six largest MSOs control approximately 89.9% of the
triple play Revenue Generating Units (RGU) within the U.S. cable market (according to Dataxis in
the first quarter 2009), thereby making our sales to those MSOs critical to our success. Our sales
are substantially dependent upon a system operators selection of ARRIS network equipment, demand
for increased broadband services by subscribers, and general capital expenditure levels by system
operators. Our two 10% customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast and Time
Warner Cable. Over the past year, certain customers beneficial ownership may have changed as a
result of mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, the revenue for ARRIS customers for prior periods
has been adjusted to include the affiliates currently understood to be under common control. A
summary of sales to these customers for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 are set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Comcast |
|
$ |
101,975 |
|
|
$ |
100,920 |
|
|
$ |
263,843 |
|
|
$ |
181,872 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time Warner Cable |
|
$ |
45,992 |
|
|
$ |
43,862 |
|
|
$ |
147,959 |
|
|
$ |
190,081 |
|
% of sales |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Comparison of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Net Sales
The table below sets forth our net sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, for each of our reporting segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Business Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
$ |
211,288 |
|
|
$ |
217,729 |
|
|
$ |
617,188 |
|
|
$ |
597,777 |
|
|
$ |
(6,441 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
19,411 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
ATS |
|
|
45,488 |
|
|
|
62,100 |
|
|
|
131,946 |
|
|
|
211,961 |
|
|
|
(16,612 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
(80,015 |
) |
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
MCS |
|
|
18,996 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
58,677 |
|
|
|
42,429 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
16,248 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
275,772 |
|
|
$ |
297,551 |
|
|
$ |
807,811 |
|
|
$ |
852,167 |
|
|
$ |
(21,779 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,356 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth our domestic and international sales for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
196,729 |
|
|
$ |
220,105 |
|
|
$ |
587,604 |
|
|
$ |
602,967 |
|
|
$ |
(23,376 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,363 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
International |
|
|
79,043 |
|
|
|
77,446 |
|
|
|
220,207 |
|
|
|
249,200 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(28,993 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
275,772 |
|
|
$ |
297,551 |
|
|
$ |
807,811 |
|
|
$ |
852,167 |
|
|
$ |
(21,779 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(44,356 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Broadband Communications Systems (BCS) Net Sales 2009 vs. 2008
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, sales of our Broadband Communications Systems
segment products decreased by approximately 3.0% as compared to the same period in 2008. The
following factors contributed to the decrease in sales:
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, we had lower sales of EMTAs as compared to the third
quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
The decline in EMTAs was partially offset by higher sales of CMTSs to several customers
including Time Warner Cable and Cablevision Mexico. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, sales of our Broadband Communications Systems
segment products increased by approximately 3.2% as compared to the same period in 2008. The
following factors contributed to the increase in sales:
|
|
|
Higher sales to multiple customers of our CMTS products. |
|
|
|
The increase in our CMTS product sales was partially offset by a decrease in EMTA sales
to several customers. |
Access, Transport and Supplies (ATS) Net Sales 2009 vs. 2008
Access, Transport and Supplies segment revenue decreased by approximately 26.8% and 37.7% for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods in
2008. The following factors contributed to the decrease in sales:
|
|
|
The decrease was primarily the result of the reduced spending by cable operators as a
result of the slowdown of the US economy, and in particular new housing construction that
drives capital equipment spending for plant upgrades and rebuilds by cable operators. |
|
|
|
Operators were also able to delay node segmentations by taking advantage of bandwidth
efficiency improvements brought about by the implementation of DOCSIS 3.0. |
Media & Communications Systems (MCS) Net Sales 2009 vs. 2008
Media & Communications Systems revenue increased by approximately 7.2% in the third quarter of 2009
and 38.3% in the first nine months of the year, as compared to the same periods in 2008. The
increase in sales primarily reflects the build-up of deferred revenue throughout 2008. The
deferred revenue acquired from C-COR acquisition was marked to fair value at the date of the
acquisition and rebuilt through 2008.
Gross Margin
The table below sets forth our gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, for each of our reporting segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin $ |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Business Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
$ |
94,317 |
|
|
$ |
79,278 |
|
|
$ |
265,952 |
|
|
$ |
198,756 |
|
|
$ |
15,039 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
67,196 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
ATS |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
16,624 |
|
|
|
29,733 |
|
|
|
62,370 |
|
|
|
(5,974 |
) |
|
|
(35.9 |
) |
|
|
(32,637 |
) |
|
|
(52.3 |
) |
MCS |
|
|
10,506 |
|
|
|
10,232 |
|
|
|
32,578 |
|
|
|
23,140 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
115,473 |
|
|
$ |
106,134 |
|
|
$ |
328,263 |
|
|
$ |
284,266 |
|
|
$ |
9,339 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
43,997 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The table below sets forth our gross margin percentages for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, for each of our reporting segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin % |
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30 |
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Percentage Points |
Business Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCS |
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
43.1 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
ATS |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
MCS |
|
|
55.3 |
% |
|
|
57.7 |
% |
|
|
55.5 |
% |
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
40.6 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Broadband Communications Systems Gross Margin 2009 vs. 2008
Broadband Communications Systems segment gross margin dollars and gross margin percentage increased
year over year:
|
|
|
The increase in gross margin dollars was primarily the result of higher sales due to the
successful introduction of our DOCSIS 3.0 CMTS in the second half of last year and product
mix. |
|
|
|
The increase in gross margin percentage primarily reflects product mix, as we sold more
CMTS products and fewer EMTA products in the three and nine month periods in 2009 as
compared to the same periods in 2008. CMTS products carry higher gross margin percentage
than the EMTA products. |
Access, Transport and Supplies Gross Margin 2009 vs. 2008
The Access, Transport and Supplies segment gross margin dollars and percentage decreased year over
year:
|
|
|
The decrease in gross margin dollars was primarily the result of a decrease in sales in
both the three and nine month periods in 2009. |
|
|
|
The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily the result of both a change in
product mix and a decrease in sales. In the three and nine month periods in 2009, Access
and Transport sales decreased proportionally more than the Supplies sales decreased. In
addition, our gross margin was negatively impacted by the decline in the overall volume
resulting in a higher manufacturing cost per unit due to the allocation of fixed factory
overhead costs as well as lower gross margin on certain headend optics gear. |
Media & Communications Systems Gross Margin 2009 vs. 2008
Media & Communications Systems gross margin percentage decreased during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 while increasing during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to
the same periods in 2008.
|
|
|
Both the decrease during the three months ended and the increase during the nine months
ended are primarily a result of product mix. |
|
|
|
Performance in this segment is variable as revenue recognition is significantly tied to
customer acceptances associated with multiple month and quarter projects, and non linear
orders for licenses and hardware. |
21
Operating Expenses
The table below provides detail regarding our operating expenses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Between 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
Ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
SG&A |
|
$ |
36,311 |
|
|
$ |
33,012 |
|
|
$ |
110,782 |
|
|
$ |
107,040 |
|
|
$ |
3,299 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,742 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Research &
development |
|
|
30,909 |
|
|
|
27,473 |
|
|
|
89,447 |
|
|
|
83,257 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Restructuring Charges |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Amortization of
intangibles |
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
34,854 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(7,047 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,574 |
|
|
$ |
69,833 |
|
|
$ |
228,821 |
|
|
$ |
225,933 |
|
|
$ |
6,741 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,888 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative, or SG&A, Expenses
The increase in SG&A expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the same
period in 2008 reflects:
|
|
|
Higher variable compensation costs, in particular sales commissions and incentive
accruals. |
|
|
|
An increase in stock compensation expense of $0.9 million as a result of the annual
grant in March of 2009. |
|
|
|
An increase in legal expenses of $0.8 million as a result of increased costs associated
with various patent and other litigation matters (see Legal Proceedings). |
The year over year increase in SG&A expense reflects:
|
|
|
Higher variable compensation costs, in particular incentive accruals. |
|
|
|
An increase in stock compensation expense of $2.1 million as a result of the annual stock
grant in March of 2009. |
|
|
|
An increase in legal expenses of $3.7 as a result of increased costs including
settlement costs associated with various patent and other litigation matters (see Legal
Proceedings). |
|
|
|
The increases were partially offset by decreases in travel and entertainment and
professional fees. |
Research & Development Expenses
We continue to aggressively invest in research and development. Our primary focus is on products
that allow MSOs to capture new revenues and reduce operating costs. The increase in research and
development expense reflects:
|
|
|
Higher compensation costs, fringe benefits and incentive accruals. |
|
|
|
We have incrementally invested year over year in research and development, a trend which
we anticipate will continue. |
|
|
|
We anticipate an increase in research and development expense of approximately $3
million per quarter associated with the acquisitions of EGT and Digeo. |
Restructuring Charges
On a quarterly basis, we review our existing restructuring accruals and make adjustments if
necessary. For the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2009, we recorded adjustments
of $0.1 million and $0.8 million. For the three and nine month period ending September 30, 2008,
we recorded adjustments of $0.2 million and $0.8 million respectively.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Intangibles amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $9.3
million and $9.1 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
intangible amortization expense was $27.8 million and $34.9 million, respectively.
22
The decline for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, reflects the completion of the amortization of the C-COR order backlog in 2008.
Goodwill Impairment
No goodwill impairment was recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008. We recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $128.9 million and $80.4 million
related to the ATS and MCS reporting units, respectively, during the fourth quarter of 2008. We
continue to monitor our assessments of goodwill, particularly in light of the current economic
climate, most notably with respect to the ATS segment. For the first nine months of 2009, we
concluded that there was no impairment. As the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts
of our remaining goodwill are assessed, changes in the economic conditions, changes to our
business strategy, changes in operating performance or other indicators of impairment could cause
us to realize additional impairment charges in the future.
Other Expense (Income)
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $4.4 million. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, interest expense was $13.1 million and $12.7 million
respectively. Interest expense reflects interest (including cash and non-cash components) and the
amortization of deferred finance fees associated with our $261.0 million 2% convertible
subordinated notes. See Note 2 and Note 12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loss (Gain) in Foreign Currency
During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a foreign currency loss of
approximately $1.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September
30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a foreign currency loss (gain) of approximately $3.6 million and
$(0.3) million respectively. The gains and losses are primarily driven by the fluctuation of the
value of the euro and peso, as compared to the U.S. dollar, as we had several European and Mexican
customers whose receivables and collections are denominated in Euros and Pesos. We have
implemented a hedging strategy to mitigate the monetary exchange fluctuations from the time of
invoice to the time of payment, and have occasionally entered into forward contracts based on a
percentage of expected foreign currency receipts.
Interest Income
Interest income during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.4 million and $1.5
million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, interest income
was $1.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively. The income reflects interest earned on cash, cash
equivalents and short term investments. Interest income decreased year over year as result of
lower interest rates in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Other (Income)/Expense
Other (income)/expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $(0.3) million
and $(72) thousand, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, other
expense was $(0.9) million and $(43) thousand, respectively.
Income Taxes
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded income tax expense of $12.7
million and $31.9 million, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2008, when we recorded
$10.7 million and $17.6 million, respectively. See Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about income taxes.
Financial Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
One of our key strategies is to maintain and improve our capital structure. The key metrics we
focus on are summarized in the table below:
23
Liquidity & Capital Resources Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands, except DSO and turns) |
Key Working Capital Items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
171,204 |
|
|
$ |
86,532 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments |
|
$ |
561,712 |
|
|
$ |
329,558 |
|
Long-term U.S. treasury notes |
|
$ |
15,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents,
short-term investments and
long-term U.S. treasury notes |
|
$ |
576,753 |
|
|
$ |
329,558 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
119,125 |
|
|
$ |
180,367 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding (DSOs) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
$ |
100,024 |
|
|
$ |
139,598 |
|
Inventory turns |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes at face value |
|
$ |
261,050 |
|
|
$ |
276,000 |
|
Convertible notes at book value |
|
$ |
208,420 |
|
|
$ |
208,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
14,327 |
|
|
$ |
16,444 |
|
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
We use the number of times per year that inventory turns over (based upon sales for the most recent
period, or turns) to evaluate inventory management, and days sales outstanding, or DSOs, to
evaluate accounts receivable management.
Accounts receivable and DSOs decreased during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to 2008 as
a result of lower sales and payment patterns of our customers. Looking forward, it is possible that
our DSOs may increase dependent upon our customer mix and payment patterns.
Inventory decreased in the first nine months of 2009, as compared to 2008. The dollar value of the
inventory currently on hand is lower due to the year over year decrease in sales and cost of goods
sold. Inventory turns have remained the same in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to 2008.
Summary of Current Liquidity Position and Potential for Future Capital Raising
We believe our current liquidity position, where we have approximately $561.7 million of cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments and $15.0 million of long-term U.S treasury notes on hand
as of September 30, 2009, together with the prospects for continued generation of cash from
operating activities are adequate for our short- and medium-term business needs. We may in the
future elect to repurchase additional shares of our common stock or additional principal amounts of
our outstanding convertible notes. However, a key part of our overall long-term strategy may be
implemented through additional acquisitions, and a portion of these funds may be used for that
purpose. Should our available funds be insufficient for those purposes, it is possible that we
will raise capital through private or public, share or debt offerings. Absent a major acquisition,
we do not anticipate a need to access the capital markets in 2009.
Commitments
Our contractual obligations are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. In October 2009, we made a partial payment of approximately $14.5 million for
the purchase of Digeo, Inc. We made an initial payment of approximately $1.5 million prior to
October 1, 2009. We are currently committed to making a holdback payment of approximately $4.0
million in December 2010 subject to permitted claims against the holdback. Except for these
commitments with respect to Digeo there were no other material changes to our contractual
obligation, during the first nine months of 2009.
24
Cash Flow
Below is a table setting forth the key line items of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
171,204 |
|
|
$ |
86,532 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(119,678 |
) |
|
|
9,228 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
(113,570 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
51,901 |
|
|
$ |
(17,810 |
) |
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting cash from operating activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Net income |
|
$ |
57,490 |
|
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
70,748 |
|
|
|
70,603 |
|
|
|
|
Net income including adjustments |
|
|
128,238 |
|
|
|
104,695 |
|
Decrease/(Increase) in accounts receivable |
|
|
40,801 |
|
|
|
(12,103 |
) |
Decrease/ (Increase) in inventory |
|
|
30,449 |
|
|
|
(6,028 |
) |
(Decrease) /Increase in accounts payable
and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(32,620 |
) |
|
|
9,743 |
|
All other net |
|
|
4,336 |
|
|
|
(9,775 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
171,204 |
|
|
$ |
86,532 |
|
|
|
|
Net income including adjustments increased $23.5 million during the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to the same period in 2008. Net income increased approximately $23.4 million year over
year, primarily reflecting our gross margin improvement discussed above. The adjustments to
reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities in total remained the same year over
year but had three individual differences. The three differences were (1) a gain of $4.2 million
associated with the 2009 redemption of a portion of our convertible debt, (2) a decrease in
intangible amortization of $7.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to 2008 which
was the result of the order backlog from C-COR being fully amortized during the first half of 2008,
and (3) the net deferred tax asset increased by $13.7 million during the first nine months of 2009
as compared to an increase of only $2.9 million in the same period of 2008.
Accounts receivable decreased in the first nine months of 2009 and increased in the first nine
months of 2008. The decrease in 2009 was related to a decrease in sales and payment patterns of
our customers. The increase in 2008 was related to higher sales in the third quarter of 2008.
Inventory decreased in the first nine months of 2009 primarily as a result of lower sales.
Inventory decreased in 2008 as a result of higher sales. Turns were the same in both periods.
The decline in the first nine months of 2009 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities reflects a
decrease in inventory purchases and the timing variations associated with payment of accounts
payable. The increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the first nine months of 2008
is due to the build-up of deferred revenue from the MCS segment. The deferred revenue acquired
from C-COR during the acquisition was marked to fair value at the date of acquisition. The
increase in deferred revenue was partially offset by the payment of the annual bonus in the first
quarter of 2008.
All other net includes the changes in (1) other receivables, (2) income taxes payable
(recoverable), and (3) prepaids and other, net. The other receivables represent amounts due from
our contract manufacturers for material used in the assembly of our finished goods. Whether the
balance results in an income tax payable or income tax recoverable position is a result of the
timing of the actual estimated tax payments during the year as compared to the actual tax liability
for the year.
25
Investing Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting investing activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(14,327 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,444 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(8,130 |
) |
|
|
(10,066 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(151,845 |
) |
|
|
(86,998 |
) |
Disposals of investments |
|
|
54,416 |
|
|
|
122,486 |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
(119,678 |
) |
|
$ |
9,228 |
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are mainly for test equipment, manufacturing equipment, leasehold
improvements, computer equipment, and business application software. We anticipate investing
approximately $20 million in fiscal year 2009.
Cash Paid for Acquisitions
This represents the cash payments made during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 in connection
with the C-COR, Auspice, EG Technology and Digeo acquisitions, net of cash acquired.
Purchases and Sales of Investments
This represents purchases and sales of securities.
Financing Activities:
Below are the key line items affecting our financing activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Payment of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
(10,677 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,518 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,960 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Employer repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax
withholdings |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
Fees and proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
11,205 |
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
(113,570 |
) |
|
|
|
Payment of Debt and Capital Lease Obligation
During the first quarter of 2009, we purchased $15.0 million of the face value of our convertible
debt for approximately $10.6 million. The Company also wrote off approximately $0.2 million of
deferred finance fees associated with the portion of the notes retired. The Company realized a
gain of approximately $4.2 million on the retirement of the convertible notes. As part
of the C-COR acquisition in December 2007, we assumed $35.0 million of 3.5% senior unsecured
convertible notes due on December 31, 2009. We redeemed the notes on January 14, 2008.
Repurchase of Common Stock
During the first quarter of 2008, ARRIS publicly announced that its Board of Directors had
authorized a plan (the 2008 Plan) for the Company to purchase up to $100 million of the Companys
common stock. ARRIS repurchased 13 million shares at an average price of $5.84 per share for an
aggregate consideration of approximately $76 million during the first quarter of 2008. The
remaining authorized amount of $24 million was not purchased.
26
During the first quarter of 2009, ARRIS Board of Directors authorized a new plan (the 2009
Plan), which replaced the 2008 Plan, for the Company to purchase up to $100 million of the
Companys common stock. The Company did not purchase any shares under the 2009 Plan during the
first nine months of 2009.
Employer Repurchase of Shares to Satisfy Minimum Tax Withholdings
This represents the minimum shares withheld to satisfy the minimum tax withholding when restricted
stock vests.
Excess Tax Benefits from Stock-Based Compensation Plans
This represents the cash that otherwise would have been paid for income taxes if increases in the
value of equity instruments also had not been deductible in determining taxable income.
Fees and Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock, Net
This represents expenses paid related to the issuance of stock for the C-COR acquisition, offset
with cash proceeds related to the exercise of stock options by employees.
Interest Rates
As of September 30, 2009, we did not have any floating rate indebtedness or outstanding interest
rate swap agreements.
Foreign Currency
A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in Mexico, Taiwan, China,
Ireland, and other foreign countries. Further, as part of the C-COR acquisition we acquired a
manufacturing facility in Mexico. Our sales into international markets have been and are expected
in the future to be an important part of our business. These foreign operations are subject to the
usual risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including risks with respect to currency
exchange rates, economic and political destabilization, restrictive actions and taxation by foreign
governments, nationalization, the laws and policies of the United States affecting trade, foreign
investment and loans, and foreign tax laws.
We have certain international customers who are billed in their local currency. We use a hedging
strategy and enter into forward or currency option contracts based on a percentage of expected
foreign currency revenues. The percentage can vary, based on the predictability of the revenues
denominated in foreign currencies.
Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, we, from time to time, will enter into financing arrangements
with customers. These financial arrangements include letters of credit, commitments to extend
credit and guarantees of debt. These agreements could include the granting of extended payment
terms that result in longer collection periods for accounts receivable and slower cash inflows from
operations and/or could result in the deferral of revenue.
ARRIS executes letters of credit in favor of certain landlords and vendors to guarantee performance
on lease and insurance contracts. Additionally, we have cash collateral account agreements with
our financial institutions as security against potential losses with respect to our foreign
currency hedging activities. The letters of credit and cash collateral accounts are reported as
restricted cash. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $4.5 million
and $5.7 million outstanding, respectively, of cash collateral.
Cash, Short-Term Investments and Available-For-Sale Investments
Our cash and cash equivalents (which are highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less) are primarily held in money market funds that pay either taxable or
non-taxable interest. We hold short-term investments consisting of debt securities classified as
available-for-sale, which are stated at estimated fair value. These debt securities consist
primarily of commercial paper, certificates of deposits, and U.S. government agency financial
instruments. Additionally, as of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $5.0 million of a single
auction rate security outstanding at fair value, classified as a trading security within our
long-term investments. Because it has failed at auction, we are uncertain of when we will be able
to liquidate the security. However, the Company has been provided the option to sell the security
to a major financial institution at par on June 30, 2010. Therefore, ARRIS has classified the
investment as short-term. The security is a single student loan issue
27
rated AAA and is substantially guaranteed by the federal government. We analyzed the fair value of
the security as of September 30, 2009. We have concluded that the fair value is approximately $5.0
million (including the fair value of the put options), which compares to a face value of $5.0
million. We will continue to evaluate the fair value of this security and mark it to market
accordingly.
From time to time, we held certain investments in the common stock of publicly-traded companies,
which were classified as available-for-sale. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our
holdings in these investments were immaterial. Changes in the market value of these securities
typically are recorded in other comprehensive income and gain or losses on related sales of these
securities are recognized in income.
See Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosures related to the fair
value of our investments.
The Company has a deferred compensation plan that was available to certain current and former
officers and key executives of C-COR. During 2008, this plan was merged into a new non-qualified
deferred compensation plan which is also available to key executives of the Company. Employee
compensation deferrals and matching contributions are held in a rabbi trust, which is a funding
vehicle used to protect the deferred compensation from various events (but not from bankruptcy or
insolvency).
Additionally, ARRIS previously offered a deferred compensation arrangement, which was
available to certain employees. As of December 31, 2004, the plan was frozen and no further
contributions are allowed. The deferred earnings are invested in a rabbi trust.
The Company also has a deferred retirement salary plan, which was limited to certain current or
former officers of C-COR. ARRIS holds an investment to cover its liability.
The Company, beginning in the third quarter of 2009, has begun funding in a rabbi trust, its
nonqualified defined benefit plan for certain executives.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are made at a level designed to support the strategic and operating needs of
the business. ARRIS capital expenditures were $14.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to $16.4 million in the first nine months of 2008. Management expects to invest
approximately $20 million in capital expenditures for the fiscal year 2009.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the ARRIS are in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Management has discussed the development and selection of
the Companys critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of the Companys Board of
Directors and the audit committee has reviewed the Companys related disclosures. Our critical
accounting policies and estimates are disclosed extensively in our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC. Our critical accounting estimates have not changed in
any material respect during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information and statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this report, including
statements using terms such as may, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, believe,
plan, continue, could be, or similar variations or the negative thereof, constitute
forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, and
business of ARRIS, including statements that are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the markets in which we operate and managements beliefs and
assumptions regarding these markets. These and any other statements in this document that are not
statements about historical facts are forward-looking statements. We caution investors that
forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety
of factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or
other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause
results or events to differ from current expectations are described in the risk factors set forth
in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
28
These factors are not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties that may
affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business. In providing
forward-looking statements, ARRIS expressly disclaims any obligation to update publicly or
otherwise these statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise
except to the extent required by law.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rates and foreign currency rates. The
following discussion of our risk-management activities includes forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements.
We have had investments in auction rate securities that are classified as available-for-sale
securities. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we held one auction rate security of
$5.0 million. Although these securities have maturity dates of 15 to 30 years, they have
characteristics of short-term investments as the interest rates reset every 7, 28, or 35 days and
we have the potential to liquidate them in an auction process. Due to the short duration of these
investments, a movement in market interest rates would not have a material impact on our operating
results. However, it is possible that a security will fail to reprice at the scheduled auction
date. In these instances, we are entitled to receive a penalty interest rate above market and the
auction rate security will be held until the next scheduled auction date. ARRIS auction rate
security of $5.0 million has continued to fail at auction, resulting in ARRIS continuing to hold
this security. Due to the current market conditions and the failure of the auction rate security
to reprice, beginning in the second quarter of 2008, we recorded changes in the fair value of the
instrument as an impairment charge in the Statement of Operations in the gain (loss) on investments
line. This particular security was held as of September 30, 2009 as a trading security within
short-term investments with a fair market value of $5.0 million (including the fair value of the
put option). ARRIS may not be able to liquidate this security until a successful auction occurs,
or alternatively, we have been provided the option to sell the security to a major financial
institution at par on September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
recorded an increase in fair value of $46 thousand.
A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in China, Mexico, Ireland,
Taiwan, and other countries outside the United States. Our sales into international markets have
been and are expected in the future to be an important part of our business. These foreign
operations are subject to the usual risks inherent in conducting business abroad, including risks
with respect to currency exchange rates, economic and political destabilization, restrictive
actions and taxation by foreign governments, nationalization, the laws and policies of the United
States affecting trade, foreign investment and loans, and foreign tax laws.
We have certain international customers who are billed in their local currency. Changes in the
monetary exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. To
manage the volatility relating to these typical business exposures, we may enter into various
derivative transactions, when appropriate. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for
trading or other speculative purposes. The euro and the peso are the predominant currencies of
those customers who are billed in their local currency. Taking into account the effects of foreign
currency fluctuations of the euro and the peso versus the dollar, a hypothetical 10% weakening of
the U.S. dollar (as of September 30, 2009) would provide a gain on foreign currency of
approximately $1.8 million. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar would
provide a loss on foreign currency of approximately $1.8 million. The actual impact of foreign
exchange rate changes will depend on, among other factors, the timing of rate changes and changes
in the volume and mix of the our business. As of September 30, 2009, we had no material contracts,
other than accounts receivable, denominated in foreign currencies.
We regularly review our forecasted sales in euros and enter into option contracts when appropriate.
In the event that we determine a hedge to be ineffective prior to expirations earnings may be
effected by the change in the hedge value. As of September 30, 2009, we had option collars
outstanding with notional amounts totaling $6.0 million euros, which mature through 2010. As of
September 30, 2009, we had forward contracts outstanding with notional amounts totaling $12.0
million euros, which mature in 2009 and $9.0 million euros maturing in 2010. The fair value of
these option collars and forward contracts was a net liability of approximately $2.7 million as of
September 30, 2009.
29
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act))
as of the end of the period covered by this report (the Evaluation Date). Based on that
evaluation, such officers concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as contemplated by the Act.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer evaluated the changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter. Based on that evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that there had been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, ARRIS is involved in claims, disputes, litigation or legal proceedings
incidental to the ordinary course of its business, such as intellectual property disputes,
contractual disputes, employment matters and environmental proceedings. Except as described below,
ARRIS is not party to any proceedings that are, or reasonably could be expected to be, material to
its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Commencing in 2005, Rembrandt Technologies, LP filed a series of lawsuits against several MSOs
alleging infringement of eight patents related to the cable systems operators use of data
transmission, video, cable modem, voice-over-internet, and other technologies and applications. On
July 14, 2009 ARRIS reached a settlement with Rembrandt.
In 2007, Adelphia Recovery Trust (Trust) contacted ARRIS asserting that ARRIS may have received
transfers from Adelphia Cablevision, LLC (Cablevision) during the year prior to its filing of a
Chapter 11 petition on September 25, 2002 (the Petition Date), and that said transfers may be
voidable. Cablevision sent similar letters to other parties. In the event a suit is commenced,
ARRIS intends to contest the case vigorously. To date, ARRIS has received no further communication
from Cablevision. No estimate can be made of the possible range of loss, if any, associated with a
resolution of these assertions.
In January and February 2008, Verizon Services Corp. filed separate lawsuits against Cox and
Charter alleging infringement of eight patents. In the Verizon v. Cox suit, the jury issued a
verdict in favor of Cox, finding non-infringement in all patents and invalidating two of Verizons
patents. Verizon has filed a notice of appeal. The Charter suit is still pending, with trial
anticipated for 2010. It is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome of the
Charter case or Cox appeal; though the Cox outcome at trial increases the likelihood of a favorable
Charter outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify Charter
and Cox, pay royalties and/or cease utilizing certain technology.
Acacia Media Technologies Corp. sued Charter and Time Warner Cable, Inc. for allegedly infringing
several U.S. Patents. The case has been bifurcated, where the case for invalidity of the patents
will be tried first, and only if one or more patents are found to be valid, then the case for
infringement will be tried. Both customers requested C-CORs, as well as other vendors, support
under the indemnity provisions of the purchase agreements (related to video-on-demand products). It
is premature to assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable
outcome, ARRIS may be required to indemnify the defendants, pay royalties and/or cease using
certain technology.
V-Tran Media Technologies has filed a number of patent infringement lawsuits against 21 different
parties, including suits against Comcast, Charter, Verizon, Time Warner and numerous smaller MSOs,
for the alleged infringement of two patents related to a television broadcast system for selective
transmission of viewer chosen programs at viewer requested times. Both patents expired in June
2008. The defendants recently received a favorable Markman Ruling and are seeking dismissal of the
suit. C-COR manufactured products that allegedly infringed on the patents. It is premature to
assess the likelihood of a favorable outcome. In the event of an unfavorable outcome, ARRIS may be
required to indemnify the defendants or pay royalties. Since the patents have expired, it is
unlikely ARRIS will be prohibited from using the technology.
In February 2008, several former employees of a former subsidiary of C-COR, filed a class action
Fair Labor Standards Act suit against the former subsidiary and C-COR alleging that the plaintiffs
were not properly paid for overtime. The proposed class could have included 1,000 cable installers
and field technicians. ARRIS is actively contesting the suit. The opt-in period for substantially
all of the plaintiffs ended July 31, 2009. To date, approximately 280 people have opted-in relative
to C-COR. The parties engaged in an attempted mediation of the dispute and such communications
continue. If the mediation is not successful ARRIS intends to vigorously defend this case.
On March 11, 2009, ARRIS filed a declaratory judgment action against British Telecom (BT) seeking
to invalidate the BT patents and seeking a declaration that neither the ARRIS products, nor their
use by ARRIS customers infringe any of the BT patents. This action arose from the assertion by BT
(via their agent, IPValue), that the ARRIS products or their use by ARRIS customers infringed four
BT patents.
On July 31, 2009, ARRIS filed a contempt motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Delaware against SeaChange International related to a patent owned by ARRIS. In its motion, ARRIS
is seeking further damages and the enforcement of the permanent injunction entered by the Court
against certain of SeaChange products sold since
31
2002. The original finding of infringement was affirmed by the Federal Circuit in 2006, and the
patent claims (with one exception) recently were upheld by the U.S. Patent Office in a
re-examination process initiated by SeaChange. In response to ARRIS Motion for Contempt, on
August 3, 2009, SeaChange filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment from the Court to
declare that its products are non-infringing with respect to the patent.
From time to time third parties approach ARRIS or an ARRIS customer, seeking that ARRIS or its
customer consider entering into a license agreement for such patents. Such invitations cause ARRIS
to dedicate time to study such patents and enter into discussions with such third parties regarding
the merits and value, if any, of the patents. These discussions, may materialize into license
agreements or patents asserted against ARRIS or its customers. If asserted against our customers,
our customers may seek indemnification from ARRIS. It is not possible to determine the impact of
any such ongoing discussions on ARRIS business financial conditions.
32
Our
business is dependent on customers capital spending on broadband communication systems, and reductions by customers in capital spending adversely affect our business.
Our performance is dependent on customers capital spending for constructing, rebuilding,
maintaining or upgrading broadband communications systems. Capital spending in the
telecommunications industry is cyclical and can be curtailed or deferred on short notice. A
variety of factors affect the amount of capital spending and, therefore, our sales and profits,
including:
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
customer specific financial or stock market conditions; |
|
|
|
availability and cost of capital; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation; |
|
|
|
demand for network services; |
|
|
|
competition from other providers of broadband and high speed services; |
|
|
|
acceptance of new services offered by our customers; and |
|
|
|
real or perceived trends or uncertainties in these factors. |
Several of our customers have accumulated significant levels of debt. These high debt levels,
coupled with the current turbulence and uncertainty in the capital markets, have affected the
market values of domestic cable operators and may impact their access to capital in the future.
Even if the financial health of our customers remains intact, we cannot assure you that these
customers may not purchase new equipment at levels we have seen in the past or expect in the
future. During the later part of 2008 and continuing into 2009, the economy and financial markets
have been heavily impacted by housing market disruptions and foreclosures as well as the recent
material credit market disruptions. One major MSO, Charter Communications, recently filed for
bankruptcy protection, and others may do so in due course. We cannot predict the impact if any of
the recent financial market turmoil, or of specific customer financial challenges on our customers
upgrade and maintenance expenditures.
The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive, and competitive pressures may adversely
affect our results of operations.
The markets for broadband communication products and services are extremely competitive and
dynamic, requiring the companies that compete in these markets to react quickly and capitalize on
change. This requires us to retain skilled and experienced personnel as well as to deploy
substantial resources toward meeting the ever-changing demands of the industry. We compete with
national and international manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers including many companies
that are larger than we are. Our major competitors include:
|
|
|
Concurrent Computer Corporation; |
|
|
|
TVC Communications, Inc. |
In some instances, notably our software products, our customers themselves may be our competition
as they may develop their own software. The rapid technological changes occurring in the broadband
markets may lead to the entry of new competitors, including those with substantially greater
resources than our own. Because the markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid growth
and, in some cases, low barriers to entry, smaller niche market companies and start-up ventures
also may become principal competitors in the future. Actions by existing competitors and the entry
of new competitors may have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability. The broadband
communications industry is further characterized by rapid technological change. In the future,
33
technological advances could lead to the obsolescence of some of our current products, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Further, many of our larger competitors are in a better position to withstand any significant
reduction in capital spending by customers in these markets. They often have broader product lines
and market focus and therefore are not as susceptible to downturns in a particular market. In
addition, several of our competitors have been in operation longer than we have been, and therefore
they have more established relationships with domestic and foreign broadband service users. We may
not be able to compete successfully in the future, and competition may negatively impact our
business.
Consolidations in the telecommunications industry could result in delays or reductions in purchases
of products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The telecommunications industry has experienced the consolidation of many industry participants,
and this trend may continue. When consolidations occur, it is possible that the acquirer will not
continue using the same suppliers, thereby possibly resulting in an immediate or future elimination
of sales opportunities for us or our competitors, depending upon who had the business initially.
Consolidations also could result in delays in purchasing decisions by the merged businesses. The
purchasing decisions of the merged companies could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Mergers among the supplier base also have increased, and this trend may continue. Larger combined
companies with pooled capital resources may be able to provide solution alternatives with which we
would be put at a disadvantage to compete. The larger breadth of product offerings by these
consolidated suppliers could result in customers electing to trim their supplier base for the
advantages of one-stop shopping solutions for all of their product needs. Consolidation of the
supplier base could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may pursue acquisitions and investments that could adversely affect our business.
In the past, we have made acquisitions of and investments in businesses, products, and technologies
to complement or expand our business. While we have no announced plans for additional acquisitions,
future acquisitions are part of our strategic objectives and may occur. If we identify an
acquisition candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate or finance the acquisition or
integrate the acquired businesses, products, or technologies with our existing business and
products. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, and substantial goodwill.
We will test the goodwill that is created by acquisitions, at least annually and will record an
impairment charge if its value has declined. For instance, in the fourth quarter of 2008, we
recorded a substantial impairment charge with respect to the goodwill that was created as part of
our acquisition of C-COR.
We have substantial goodwill.
Our financial statements reflect substantial goodwill, approximately $234.4 million as of September
30, 2009, that was recognized in connection with the acquisitions that we have made. We annually
(and more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired) review
the carrying amount of our goodwill in order to determine whether it has been impaired for
accounting purposes. In general, if the fair value of the corresponding reporting unit is less
than the carrying value of the goodwill, we assess for impairment. The determination of fair value
is dependent upon a number of factors, including assumptions about future cash flows and growth
rates that are based on our current and long-term business plans. In 2008, we recorded an
impairment charge to our goodwill of approximately $209.3 million. As the ongoing expected cash
flows and carrying amounts of our remaining goodwill are assessed, changes in the economic
conditions, changes to our business strategy, changes in operating performance or other indicators
of impairment could cause us to realize an additional impairment charge in the future. Further, as
of October 1, 2009, the Company will perform its annual impairment testing which could result in an
impairment of goodwill.
Our business comes primarily from a few key customers. The loss of one of these customers or a
significant reduction in sales to one of these customers would have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Our two largest customers (including their affiliates, as applicable) are Comcast, and Time Warner
Cable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, sales to Comcast accounted for approximately
32.7% , of our total revenues and sales to Time Warner Cable accounted for approximately 18.3%. The
loss of either of these customers, or one of our other large customers, or a significant reduction
in the products or services provided to any of them would have a material adverse impact on our
business. For each of these customers, we also are one of their largest suppliers. A consequence of
that, if from time-to-time customers elect to purchase products from our competitors in order to
34
diversify their supplier base and to dual-source key products or to curtail purchasing due to
budgetary or market conditions, such decisions could have material consequences to our business. In
addition, because of the magnitude of our sales to these customers the terms and timing of our
sales are heavily negotiated, and even minor changes can have a significant impact upon or
business.
We may have difficulty in forecasting our sales.
Because a significant portion of the purchases by our customers are discretionary, accurately
forecasting sales is difficult. In addition, more so than historically, in recent years our
customers have submitted their purchase orders less evenly over the course of each quarter and year
and with shorter lead times. This has made it even more difficult for us to forecast sales and
other financial measures and plan accordingly.
The
broadband products that we develop and sell are subject to technological change and a trend toward open standards, which may impact our future sales and margins.
The broadband products we sell are subject to continuous technological evolution. Further, the
cable industry has and will continue to demand a move toward open standards. The move toward open
standards is expected to increase the number of MSOs that will offer new services, in particular,
telephony. This trend also is expected to increase the number of competitors and drive capital
costs per subscriber deployed down. These factors may adversely impact both our future revenues
and margins.
Fluctuations
in our Media & Communications Systems sales result in greater volatility in our operating results.
The level of our Media & Communications Systems sales fluctuate significantly quarter to
quarter and results in greater volatility of our operating results than has been typical in the
past, when the main source of volatility was the high proportion of quick-turn product sales. The
timing of revenue recognition on software and system sales is based on specific contract terms and,
in certain cases, is dependent upon completion of certain activities and customer acceptance which
are difficult to forecast accurately. Because the gross margins associated with software and
systems sales are substantially higher than our average gross margins, fluctuations in quarterly
software sales have a disproportionate effect on operating results and earnings per share and could
result in our operating results falling short of the expectations of the investment community.
Products currently under development may fail to realize anticipated benefits.
Rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and
relatively short product life cycles characterize the markets for our products. The technology
applications that we currently are developing may not be ultimately successful. Even if the
products in development are successfully brought to market, they may not be widely used or we may
not be able to successfully capitalize on their technology. To compete successfully, we must
quickly design, develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly
higher levels of performance and reliability. However, we may not be able to successfully develop
or introduce these products if our products:
|
|
|
are not cost-effective; |
|
|
|
are not brought to market in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
fail to achieve market acceptance; or |
|
|
|
fail to meet industry certification standards. |
Furthermore, our competitors may develop similar or alternative technologies that, if successful,
could have a material adverse effect on us. Our strategic alliances are based on business
relationships that have not been the subject of written agreements expressly providing for the
alliance to continue for a significant period of time. The loss of a strategic relationship could
have a material adverse effect on the progress of new products under development with that third
party.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in all
facets of our operations.
Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and
retaining key personnel, which could impact our ability to maintain and grow our operations. Our
future success will depend, to a significant extent, on the ability of our management to operate
effectively. In the past, competitors and others have attempted to recruit our employees and in
the future, their attempts may continue. The loss of services of any key personnel, the inability
to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring required personnel,
particularly engineers and other technical professionals, could negatively affect our business.
35
We are substantially dependent on contract manufacturers, and an inability to obtain adequate and
timely delivery of supplies could adversely affect our business.
Many components, subassemblies and modules necessary for the manufacture or integration of our
products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on sole
or limited suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our reliance on subcontractors involves
several risks including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components,
subassemblies or modules and reduced control over pricing, quality and timely delivery of
components, subassemblies or modules. Historically, we have not maintained long-term agreements
with any of our suppliers or subcontractors. An inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any
other circumstance that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply could affect our
ability to ship products on a timely basis. Any inability to reliably ship our products on time
could damage relationships with current and prospective customers and harm our business.
Our international operations may be adversely affected by any decline in the demand for broadband
systems designs and equipment in international markets.
Sales of broadband communications equipment into international markets are an important part of our
business. Our products are marketed and made available to existing and new potential international
customers. In addition, United States broadband system designs and equipment are increasingly being
employed in international markets, where market penetration is relatively lower than in the United
States. While international operations are expected to comprise an integral part of our future
business, international markets may no longer continue to develop at the current rate, or at all.
We may fail to receive additional contracts to supply equipment in these markets.
Our international operations may be adversely affected by changes in the foreign laws in the
countries in which we and our manufacturers and assemblers have plants.
A significant portion of our products are manufactured or assembled in China, Ireland, Mexico, and
other countries outside of the United States. The governments of the foreign countries in which our
products are manufactured may pass laws that impair our operations, such as laws that impose
exorbitant tax obligations or nationalize these manufacturing facilities.
In addition, we own a manufacturing facility located in Tijuana, Mexico. This operation is exposed
to certain risks as a result of its location, including:
|
|
|
changes in international trade laws, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and
Prosec, affecting our import and export activities; |
|
|
|
changes in, or expiration of, the Mexican governments IMMEX (Manufacturing Industry
Maquiladora and Export Services) program, which provides economic benefits to us; |
|
|
|
changes in labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire and retain
employees; |
|
|
|
fluctuations of foreign currency and exchange controls; |
|
|
|
potential political instability and changes in the Mexican government; |
|
|
|
potential regulatory changes; and |
|
|
|
general economic conditions in Mexico. |
Any of these risks could interfere with the operation of this facility and result in reduced
production, increased costs, or both. In the event that production capacity of this facility is
reduced, we could fail to ship products on schedule and could face a reduction in future orders
from dissatisfied customers. If our costs to operate this facility increase, our margins would
decrease. Reduced shipments and margins would have an adverse effect on our financial results.
We face risks relating to currency fluctuations and currency exchange.
On an ongoing basis we are exposed to various changes in foreign currency rates because significant
sales are denominated in foreign currencies. These risk factors can impact our results of
operations, cash flows and financial position. We manage these risks through regular operating and
financing activities and periodically use derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange
forward and option contracts. There can be no assurance that our risk management strategies will be
effective.
We also may encounter difficulties in converting our earnings from international operations to U.S.
dollars for use in the United States. These obstacles may include problems moving funds out of the
countries in which the funds were earned and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable in
foreign countries where the usual accounts receivable payment cycle is longer.
36
We depend on channel partners to sell our products in certain regions and are subject to risks
associated with these arrangements.
We utilize distributors, value-added resellers, system integrators, and manufacturers
representatives to sell our products to certain customers and in certain geographic regions to
improve our access to these customers and regions and to lower our overall cost of sales and
post-sales support. Our sales through channel partners are subject to a number of risks,
including:
|
|
|
ability of our selected channel partners to effectively sell our products to end
customers; |
|
|
|
our ability to continue channel partner arrangements into the future since most are for
a limited term and subject to mutual agreement to extend; |
|
|
|
a reduction in gross margins realized on sale of our products; and |
|
|
|
a diminution of contact with end customers which, over time, could adversely impact our
ability to develop new products that meet customers evolving requirements. |
Our
profitability has been, and may continue to be, volatile, which could adversely affect the price of our stock.
Although we have been profitable in the last three fiscal years, prior to that we experienced
significant losses and we may not be profitable, or meet the level of expectations of the
investment community, in the future. This could have a material adverse impact on our stock price.
We
may face higher costs associated with protecting our intellectual property or obtaining access necessary to intellectual property of others.
Our future success depends in part upon our proprietary technology, product development,
technological expertise and distribution channels. We cannot predict whether we can protect our
technology or whether competitors can develop similar technology independently. We have received,
directly or indirectly, and may continue to receive from third parties, including some of our
competitors, notices claiming that we, or our customers using our products, have infringed upon
third-party patents or other proprietary rights. We are a defendant in proceedings (and other
proceedings have been threatened) in which our customers were sued for patent infringement and
sued, or made claims against, us and other suppliers for indemnification, and we may become
involved in similar litigation involving these and other customers in the future. These claims,
regardless of their merit, result in costly litigation, divert the time, attention and resources of
our management, delay our product shipments, and, in some cases, require us to enter into royalty
or licensing agreements. If a claim of product infringement against us is successful and we fail to
obtain a license or develop non-infringing technology, our business and operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. In addition, the payment of any damages or any necessary
licensing fees or indemnification costs associated with a patent infringement claim could be
material and could also materially adversely affect our operating results. See Legal Proceedings.
Changes in accounting pronouncements can impact our business.
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. These principles periodically are modified by the FASB and other governing authorities,
and those changes can impact how we report our results of operations, cash flows and financial
positions. For instance, the FASB recently announced that it has modified, the accounting
principles that govern the reporting of interest expense with respect to certain convertible
indebtedness, such as the convertible notes that we have outstanding. The consequence of this
resulted in an increase in our interest expense and a restatement of interest expense for prior
periods. These changes could be significant.
We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Although from time to time we may consider repurchasing shares of our common stock, we do not
anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the
payment of dividends in certain circumstances may be prohibited by the terms of our current and
future indebtedness.
We have anti-takeover defenses that could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company.
We have a shareholder rights plan (commonly known as a poison pill). This plan is not intended
to prevent a takeover, but is intended to protect and maximize the value of stockholders
interests. This plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or may delay
that process.
37
We have the ability to issue preferred shares without stockholder approval.
Our common shares may be subordinate to classes of preferred shares issued in the future in the
payment of dividends and other distributions made with respect to common shares, including
distributions upon liquidation or dissolution. Our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation permits our board of directors to issue preferred shares without first obtaining
stockholder approval. If we issued preferred shares, these additional securities may have dividend
or liquidation preferences senior to the common shares. If we issue convertible preferred shares, a
subsequent conversion may dilute the current common stockholders interest.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARRIS GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ David B. Potts
|
|
|
David B. Potts |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
Officer, and Chief Information Officer |
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009
39